GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1 COMMON PROVISIONS
Section
44-1-101. Short title.
The short title of this title 44 is the "Department of Revenue Activities Regulation Act".
Source: L. 2018: Entire title added, effective October 1. (For the 9 bills that added this title 44 and their locations in the 2018 Session Laws, see the editor's note following the title 44 heading.)
44-1-102. Legislative declaration.
-
The general assembly hereby finds and declares that:
- Before the enactment of this title 44, laws administered by the department of revenue that regulate a variety of activities were codified in two titles of the Colorado Revised Statutes, most prominently in title 12, which governs professions and occupations;
- Most professions and occupations are regulated by the department of regulatory agencies pursuant to title 12, but prior to the 2017 legislative session, title 12 contained numerous laws that did not pertain to the regulation of professions and occupations and were not administered by the department of regulatory agencies;
- With the enactment of section 2-3-510 in 2016, the general assembly directed the office of legislative legal services to study an organizational recodification of title 12 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, including relocating laws that do not pertain to professions and occupations and are not administered by the department of regulatory agencies;
- Based on recommendations from the title 12 recodification study, the general assembly enacted several bills in the 2017 legislative session to relocate out of title 12 many laws that are administered by entities other than the department of regulatory agencies;
-
The study also recommended creating a new title 44 for purposes of consolidating laws administered by the department of revenue that regulate activities into a single title in order to facilitate both:
- The public's and regulated entities' understanding of the laws that apply to them; and
- The department of revenue's administration of these laws; and
- Creating a new title 44 consisting of laws administered by the department of revenue that regulate various activities is necessary to implement the recommendations of the title 12 recodification study and facilitate the reorganization of title 12 pertaining to the regulation of professions and occupations.
Source: L. 2018: Entire title added, effective October 1. (For the 9 bills that added this title 44 and their locations in the 2018 Session Laws, see the editor's note following the title 44 heading.)
44-1-103. Definitions.
As used in this title 44, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
"Department" means the department of revenue created in section 24-1-117.
- (1.5) (a) "Driver's history" means a driver's history record made and maintained in accordance with section 42-2-121 (2).
- "Driver's history" does not include a misdemeanor or felony conviction, notwithstanding that the conviction is included within the driver's history record made and maintained in accordance with section 42-2-121 (2).
- "Executive director" means the executive director of the department.
Source: L. 2018: Entire title added, effective October 1. (For the 9 bills that added this title 44 and their locations in the 2018 Session Laws, see the editor's note following the title 44 heading.) L. 2021: (1.5) added, (SB 21-040), ch. 59, p. 240, § 4, effective September 7.
44-1-104. Use of driver's history for professional licensing, permit, or registration decisions.
-
When a person applies for a license, permit, or registration under this title 44, the department shall not consider an event in the applicant's driver's history when determining whether to issue to the applicant a new, renewal, or reinstated license, permit, or registration unless:
- The event is relevant to the performance of the profession or occupation that is the subject of the application; and
-
- The operation of a motor vehicle is a duty of the profession or occupation that is the subject of the application;
- The event is a part of a pattern of behavior that is relevant to the performance of the profession or occupation that is the subject of the application; or
- The event occurred within three years before the date that the applicant submitted the application to the department.
-
-
Unless subsection (2)(b) of this section applies, the department shall not consider an event within the driver's history of a license holder, permit holder, or registrant when determining:
(I) Whether to impose discipline;
(II) The type of discipline to impose; or
(III) The severity of discipline to impose.
-
The department may consider an event within a driver's history if:
- The event is relevant to the performance of the profession or occupation for which the license holder, permit holder, or registrant is licensed, permitted, or registered; and
-
- The operation of a motor vehicle is a duty of the profession or occupation for which the license holder, permit holder, or registrant is licensed, permitted, or registered;
- The event is a part of a pattern of behavior that is relevant to the performance of the profession or occupation for which the license holder, permit holder, or registrant is licensed, permitted, or registered; or
- The event occurred within three years before the act upon which the discipline is based.
-
Unless subsection (2)(b) of this section applies, the department shall not consider an event within the driver's history of a license holder, permit holder, or registrant when determining:
Source: L. 2021: Entire section added, (SB 21-040), ch. 59, p. 241, § 5, effective September 7.
44-1-105. Feasibility report - regulation of kratom - prohibited acts - definition - rules - repeal.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, "kratom product" means any product or ingredient containing:
- Any part of the leaf of the mitragyna speciosa plant if the plant contains the alkaloid mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine; or
- A synthetic material that contains the alkaloid mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine.
-
-
On or before January 4, 2023, the executive director shall submit to the general assembly a report analyzing the feasibility of regulating kratom products, kratom processors, and kratom retailers. The report must identify, consider, and recommend legislative action addressing the following subjects:
- The appropriate state agency or agencies to regulate the manufacture, sale, offering for sale, possession, or use of kratom products;
- Appropriate definitions of terms including "processing", "selling", "advertising", "kratom", and "kratom products";
- Appropriate age restrictions for kratom purchasing and consumption;
- Feasibility and enforcement of underage compliance checks;
- A testing program for identifying kratom products;
- An evaluation of the competencies and capabilities of existing private third-party laboratories to manage kratom testing;
- The appropriate standards for laboratory accreditation and performance;
- Testing requirements for identifying kratom that is offered for sale to a Colorado consumer;
- Consideration of types of kratom products that are available as food, including tea powders, gummies, beverages, pills, capsules, and extracts;
- The types of kratom products that should not be permitted to be sold or offered for sale;
- Serving sizes and related restrictions;
- Labeling requirements including a prohibition on unproven health or medical benefit claims;
- Manufacturing processes and requirements for processors;
- Current good manufacturing process requirements under regulations promulgated by the federal drug administration for any vendor processing kratom;
- Adverse health-event reporting requirements and product recalls;
- Advertising requirements, limitations, and prohibitions;
- Tax and fee considerations;
- Recordkeeping;
- Traceability;
- Criminal and administrative penalties for violations;
- Recommendations regarding an operable timeline for implementation of a regulatory framework for kratom;
- Fiscal impacts and resource requirements for implementation and ongoing administration of a regulatory program for kratom; and
- Alternatives, including consumer protection requirements such as liability insurance requirements, prohibitions, and criminal penalties, to state regulation of kratom.
- The department shall engage relevant stakeholders, including kratom processors, kratom consumers, kratom retailers, public health officials, legislative members, relevant state agencies with expertise in similar regulatory fields, local governments, and other interested stakeholders, in order to inform the feasibility report described in subsection (2)(a) of this section.
- This subsection (2) is repealed, effective July 1, 2023.
-
On or before January 4, 2023, the executive director shall submit to the general assembly a report analyzing the feasibility of regulating kratom products, kratom processors, and kratom retailers. The report must identify, consider, and recommend legislative action addressing the following subjects:
-
Effective July 1, 2024, a person shall not:
- Knowingly prepare, distribute, advertise, sell, or offer to sell a kratom product that is adulterated with fentanyl or any other controlled substance listed in part 2 of article 18 of title 18;
-
Sell a kratom product that does not have a label that clearly sets forth:
- The identity and address of the manufacturer; and
- The full list of ingredients in the kratom product;
- Knowingly prepare, distribute, advertise, sell, or offer to sell a kratom product to a person under twenty-one years of age; or
- Display or store kratom products in a retail location in a manner that will allow the products to be accessed by individuals under twenty-one years of age.
- The executive director may promulgate rules that are necessary for the enforcement of subsection (3) of this section.
Source: L. 2022: Entire section added, (SB 22-120), ch. 251, p. 1838, § 2, effective August 10.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 22-120, see section 1 of chapter 251, Session Laws of Colorado 2022.
ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO REGULATION
ARTICLE 3 ALCOHOL BEVERAGES
Editor's note: This article 3 was added with relocations in 2018. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this article 3, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.
Law reviews. For comment, "The Substantive Fallacy of the Twenty-first Amendment", see 61 Den. L.J. 235 (1984); for article, "Administrative Sanctions Against C olorado Liquor Licenses", see 30 C olo. Law. 61 (Dec. 2001); for article, "Basics of Colorado Liquor Licensing Law", see 38 Colo. Law. 71 (Oct. 2009).
Section
PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
44-3-101. Short title.
The short title of this article 3 is the "Colorado Liquor Code".
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 950, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-101 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Intent and primary purpose of the Colorado liquor code is to authorize, subject to regulation and safeguards, the sale and consumption of intoxicating liquors, and, at the same time, to completely outlaw and eradicate the vices and ill effects which had come to be associated with the sale of such beverages. Clown's Den, Inc. v. Canjar, 33 Colo. App. 212, 518 P.2d 957 (1974).
This article has to do with malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors. Big Top, Inc. v. Schooley, 149 Colo. 116, 368 P.2d 201 (1962).
Contractual limitations on the sale of intoxicating liquors generally are not against the statute or its implied or expressed policy. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
If parties to a contract desire to place restrictions on the sale of liquors greater than this article imposes, the law will sanction the agreement, and this is true even though a contracting party gains an advantage thereby. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Legal sales activities. Sales activities which are not restricted, limited, or otherwise regulated by this article are not illegal. People v. Kagan, 195 Colo. 76, 575 P.2d 416 (1978).
Liquor code is not to be subjected to strained or narrow construction. Clown's Den, Inc. v. Canjar, 33 Colo. App. 212, 518 P.2d 957 (1974).
The right of a licensee in his relation to the state is narrow, confined, and transitory. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Applied in Waymire v. Ahern, 152 Colo. 46, 380 P.2d 239 (1963).
44-3-102. Legislative declaration.
- The general assembly hereby declares that this article 3 shall be deemed an exercise of the police powers of the state for the protection of the economic and social welfare and the health, peace, and morals of the people of this state and that no provisions of this article 3 shall ever be construed so as to authorize the establishment or maintenance of any saloon.
- The general assembly further declares that it is lawful to manufacture and sell for beverages or medicinal purposes alcohol beverages, subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions in this article 3.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 951, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-102 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Exercise of police power. The state liquor code is deemed an exercise of the police power and a vested interest on the ground of conditions once obtained cannot be asserted against the proper exercise of this power. City and County of Denver v. People, 103 Colo. 565, 88 P.2d 89, appeal dismissed, 307 U.S. 615, 59 S. Ct. 1044, 83 L. Ed. 1496 (1939).
Statutes dealing with the liquor industry are founded on public policy and constitute an exercise of the police powers of the state. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Purpose. The purpose of this article is the "protection of the economic and social welfare, the health and peace and morals", of any given locality in the state. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
The aim, intent, and primary purpose of the people in the adoption of art. XXII, Colo. Const., and of the general assembly in the passage of this article, was to completely outlaw and eradicate the old-time public saloon or barroom with its well-known obnoxious characteristics, vices, and effects, and at the same time to authorize, under proper regulations and safeguards, the sale and consumption of intoxicating liquors in bona fide restaurants and hotels. City and County of Denver v. Gushurst, 120 Colo. 465, 210 P.2d 616 (1949).
The primary purpose of the liquor laws of this state is to authorize the sale and consumption of intoxicating beverages while simultaneously protecting the public's health, safety, and welfare. New Safari Lounge, Inc. v. City of Colo. Springs, 193 Colo. 428, 567 P.2d 372 (1977).
The liquor code was enacted to control the manufacture, distribution, and sale of liquor for the protection of the economic and social welfare and health, peace, and morals of the people of Colorado. Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Section indicates legislative intent to regulate all aspects of licensing process including criminal penalties. People v. Bagby, 734 P.2d 1059 (Colo. 1987).
Applicability of liquor code. The provisions of this article do not apply to third persons who are not applicants of licensees and whose conduct does not violate specific provisions of this article but does violate specific provisions of the criminal code. People v. Eckley, 775 P.2d 566 (Colo. 1989).
State declares public policy. The public policy of the state concerning intoxicating liquor is for the law-making power to declare, and a municipality has no such power. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
Which includes issuance of hotel and restaurant licenses. The general assembly of the state of Colorado has authorized the issuance of hotel and restaurant liquor licenses throughout the state, therefore, the public policy has thus been determined. Farmer v. City Council, 153 Colo. 306, 385 P.2d 596 (1963).
There is no inherent right to carry on the business of selling alcoholic beverages. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
Mere privilege exercised under license. It is settled doctrine that the right to sell intoxicating liquors depends upon strict compliance of the vendor with the requirements of the laws in force in the community where the sale is proposed, and no absolute right to engage in the traffic has ever been admitted in this state, and it is and always has been a mere privilege exercised under a license granted by public authority. Schwartz v. People, 46 C olo. 239, 104 P. 92 (1909) (decided prior to earliest source, L. 35, p. 597, § 1).
No mandate to permit sale. Where petitioner contended that the liquor code is a mandate to permit the sale of liquor except in local option territory, the court said that it did not so construe it, because it makes the sale of liquor lawful, "subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions contained in this article". Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
However, a liquor license vests a personal right in the licensee to conduct the business. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Though not technically property, a liquor license is a valuable right and possesses some of the characteristics of property, and it may be revoked for breach of the conditions upon which it was issued. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
The license confers the right to do that which without the license would be unlawful. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Liquor-related businesses form a distinct and justifiable class for regulatory purposes, and thus for taxing purposes. Tom's Tavern, Inc. v. City of Boulder, 186 Colo. 321, 526 P.2d 1328 (1974).
Objection based on abhorrence of alcohol not considered. The general assembly decreed that the business of manufacturing, distributing, and selling of liquor is lawful when supervised and controlled as provided by law, hence, the supreme court cannot consider objections to a license rooted solely in basic abhorrence of alcoholic beverages in any form, at any place, at any time. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
Because those opposing the granting of any application for a liquor license under all circumstances anywhere are not in harmony with the law on that subject as established by the general assembly. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
Applied in Citizens for Free Enter. v. Dept. of Rev., 649 P.2d 1054 (Colo. 1982).
44-3-103. Definitions.
As used in this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44, unless the context otherwise requires:
- "Adult" means a person lawfully permitted to purchase alcohol beverages.
- "Alcohol beverage" means fermented malt beverage or malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors; except that "alcohol beverage" shall not include confectionery containing alcohol within the limits prescribed by section 25-5-410 (1)(i)(II).
- "Alternating proprietor licensed premises" means a distinct and definite area, as specified in an alternating use of premises application, that is owned by or in possession of a person licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402, 44-3-403, 44-3-417, or 44-3-422 and within which the licensee and other persons licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402, 44-3-403, 44-3-417, or 44-3-422 are authorized to manufacture and store vinous liquors or malt liquors in accordance with this article 3.
- "Bed and breakfast" means an overnight lodging establishment that provides at least one meal per day at no charge other than a charge for overnight lodging and does not sell alcohol beverages by the drink.
- "Brew pub" means a retail establishment that manufactures not more than one million eight hundred sixty thousand gallons of malt liquor on its licensed premises or licensed alternating proprietor licensed premises, combined, each calendar year.
- "Brewery" means any establishment where malt liquors are manufactured, except brew pubs licensed under this article 3.
- "Campus" means property owned or used by an institution of higher education to regularly provide students with education, housing, or college activities.
- "Campus liquor complex" means an area within a campus that is licensed to serve alcohol under section 44-3-413 (3).
-
"Club" means:
-
A corporation that:
- Has been incorporated for not less than three years; and
- Has a membership that has paid dues for a period of at least three years; and
- Has a membership that for three years has been the owner, lessee, or occupant of an establishment operated solely for objects of a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political, or athletic nature, but not for pecuniary gain, and the property as well as the advantages of which belong to the members;
- A corporation that is a regularly chartered branch, or lodge, or chapter of a national organization that is operated solely for the objects of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain.
-
A corporation that:
- "Colorado grown" means wine produced from one hundred percent Colorado-grown grapes, other fruits, or other agricultural products containing natural sugar, including honey, manufactured by a winery that is located in Colorado and licensed pursuant to part 3 of this article 3.
-
"Common consumption area" means an area designed as a common area in an entertainment district approved by the local licensing authority that uses physical barriers to close the area to motor vehicle traffic and limit pedestrian access.
(11.5) "Communal outdoor dining area" means an outdoor space that is used for food and alcohol beverage service by two or more licensees licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 as a:
- Tavern;
- Hotel and restaurant;
- Brew pub;
- Distillery pub;
- Vintner's restaurant;
- Beer and wine licensee;
- Manufacturer that operates a sales room authorized under section 44-3-402 (2) or (7);
- Beer wholesaler that operates a sales room under section 44-3-407 (1)(b)(I);
- Limited winery;
- Lodging and entertainment facility;
- Optional premises; or
- Fermented malt beverage retailer licensed for consumption on the premises.
- "Distill" or "distillation" means the process by which alcohol that is created by fermentation is separated from the portion of the liquid that has no alcohol content.
- "Distillery" means any establishment where spirituous liquors are manufactured.
-
"Distillery pub" means a retail establishment:
- Whose primary purpose is selling and serving food and alcohol beverages for on-premises consumption; and
- That ferments and distills not more than eight hundred seventy-five thousand liters of spirituous liquor on its licensed premises each calendar year.
-
"Entertainment district" means an area that:
- Is located within a municipality, a city and county, or the unincorporated area of a county and is designated in accordance with section 44-3-301 (11)(b) as an entertainment district;
- Comprises no more than one hundred acres; and
-
Contains at least twenty thousand square feet of premises that, at the time the district is created, is licensed pursuant to this article 3 as a:
- Tavern;
- Hotel and restaurant;
- Brew pub;
- Distillery pub;
- Retail gaming tavern;
- Vintner's restaurant;
- Beer and wine licensee;
- Manufacturer that operates a sales room pursuant to section 44-3-402 (2) or (7);
- Beer wholesaler that operates a sales room pursuant to section 44-3-407 (1)(b)(I);
- Limited winery;
- Lodging and entertainment facility licensee; or
- Optional premises.
- "Expert taster" means an individual, other than a qualified student or qualified employee, who is at least twenty-one years of age and who is employed in the brewing industry or has demonstrated expertise or experience in brewing.
- "Ferment" or "fermentation" means the chemical process by which sugar is converted into alcohol.
- "Fermented malt beverage" has the same meaning as provided in section 44-4-103 (1).
-
"Good cause", for the purpose of refusing or denying a license renewal or initial license issuance, means:
- The licensee or applicant has violated, does not meet, or has failed to comply with any of the terms, conditions, or provisions of this article 3 or any rules promulgated pursuant to this article 3;
- The licensee or applicant has failed to comply with any special terms or conditions that were placed on its license in prior disciplinary proceedings or arose in the context of potential disciplinary proceedings;
- In the case of a new license, the applicant has not established the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of its adult inhabitants as provided in section 44-3-301 (2); or
- Evidence that the licensed premises have been operated in a manner that adversely affects the public health, welfare, or safety of the immediate neighborhood in which the establishment is located, which evidence must include a continuing pattern of fights, violent activity, or disorderly conduct. For purposes of this subsection (19)(d), "disorderly conduct" has the meaning as provided for in section 18-9-106.
- "Hard cider" means an alcohol beverage containing at least one-half of one percent and less than seven percent alcohol by volume that is made by fermentation of the natural juice of apples or pears, including but not limited to flavored hard cider and hard cider containing not more than 0.392 grams of carbon dioxide per hundred milliliters. For the purpose of simplicity of administration of this article 3, hard cider shall in all respects be treated as a vinous liquor except where expressly provided otherwise.
- "Hotel" means any establishment with sleeping rooms for the accommodation of guests and having restaurant facilities.
- "Inhabitant", with respect to cities or towns having less than forty thousand population, means an individual who resides in a given neighborhood or community for more than six months each year.
- "License" means a grant to a licensee to manufacture or sell alcohol beverages as provided by this article 3.
- "Licensed premises" means the premises specified in an application for a license under this article 3 that are owned or in possession of the licensee within which the licensee is authorized to sell, dispense, or serve alcohol beverages in accordance with this article 3.
- "Limited winery" means any establishment manufacturing not more than one hundred thousand gallons, or the metric equivalent thereof, of vinous liquors annually within Colorado.
- "Liquor-licensed drugstore" means any drugstore licensed by the state board of pharmacy that has also applied for and has been granted a license by the state licensing authority to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in original sealed containers for consumption off the premises.
- "Local licensing authority" means the governing body of a municipality or city and county, the board of county commissioners of a county, or any authority designated by municipal or county charter, municipal ordinance, or county resolution.
- "Location" means a particular parcel of land that may be identified by an address or by other descriptive means.
-
"Lodging and entertainment facility" means an establishment that:
-
Is either:
- A lodging facility, the primary business of which is to provide the public with sleeping rooms and meeting facilities; or
- An entertainment facility, the primary business of which is to provide the public with sports or entertainment activities within its licensed premises; and
- Incidental to its primary business, sells and serves alcohol beverages at retail for consumption on the premises and has sandwiches and light snacks available for consumption on the premises.
-
Is either:
-
- "Malt liquors" includes beer and means any beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of any infusion or decoction of barley, malt, hops, or any other similar product, or any combination thereof, in water containing not less than one-half of one percent alcohol by volume.
- For purposes of licenses described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(p), (1)(s), (1)(t), (1)(v), and (1)(w), "malt liquors" includes fermented malt beverages when purchased from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- "Meal" means a quantity of food of such nature as is ordinarily consumed by an individual at regular intervals for the purpose of sustenance.
- "Medicinal spirituous liquors" means any alcohol beverage, excepting beer and wine, that has been aged in wood for four years and bonded by the United States government and is at least one hundred proof.
-
-
"Optional premises" means:
- The premises specified in an application for a hotel and restaurant license under this article 3 with related outdoor sports and recreational facilities for the convenience of its guests or the general public located on or adjacent to the hotel or restaurant within which the licensee is authorized to sell or serve alcohol beverages in accordance with this article 3 and at the discretion of the state and local licensing authorities; or
- The premises specified in an application for an optional premises license located on an applicant's outdoor sports and recreational facility.
- For purposes of this subsection (33), "outdoor sports and recreational facility" means a facility that charges a fee for the use of such facility.
-
"Optional premises" means:
- "Package", "packaged", or "packaging" means the process by which wine is bottled, canned, kegged, or otherwise packed into a sealed container.
- "Person" means a natural person, partnership, association, company, corporation, or organization or a manager, agent, servant, officer, or employee thereof.
- "Personal consumer" means an individual who is at least twenty-one years of age, does not hold an alcohol beverage license issued in this state, and intends to use wine purchased under section 44-3-104 for personal consumption only and not for resale or other commercial purposes.
- "Powdered alcohol" means alcohol that is prepared or sold in a powder or crystalline form for either direct use or reconstitution.
-
- "Premises" means a distinct and definite location, which may include a building, a part of a building, a room, or any other definite contiguous area.
- Notwithstanding subsection (38)(a) of this section, for a winery authorized to manufacture vinous liquors pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403, the licensed premises may include up to two noncontiguous locations, both of which are used for manufacturing purposes, within a radius of ten miles.
- "Promotional association" means an association that is incorporated within Colorado, organizes and promotes entertainment activities within a common consumption area, and is organized or authorized by two or more people who own or lease property within an entertainment district.
-
"Qualified employee" means an individual who:
- Is employed by a state institution of higher education;
- Is engaged in manufacturing and tasting malt liquors for teaching or research purposes; and
- Is at least twenty-one years of age.
-
"Qualified student" means a student who:
- Is enrolled in a brewing class or program offered at or by a state institution of higher education; and
- Is at least twenty-one years of age.
- "Racetrack" means any premises where race meets or simulcast races with pari-mutuel wagering are held in accordance with the provisions of article 32 of this title 44.
- "Rectify" means to blend spirituous liquor with neutral spirits or other spirituous liquors of different age.
- "Rectifying plant" means any establishment where spirituous liquors are blended with neutral spirits or other spirituous liquors of different age.
- "Resort complex" means a hotel with at least fifty sleeping rooms and that has related sports and recreational facilities for the convenience of its guests or the general public located contiguous or adjacent to the hotel. For purposes of a resort complex only, "contiguous or adjacent" means within the overall boundaries or scheme of development or regularly accessible from the hotel by its members and guests.
- "Resort hotel" means a hotel, as defined in subsection (21) of this section, with well-defined occupancy seasons.
- "Restaurant" means an establishment, which is not a hotel as defined in subsection (21) of this section, provided with special space, sanitary kitchen and dining room equipment, and persons to prepare, cook, and serve meals, where, in consideration of payment, meals, drinks, tobaccos, and candies are furnished to guests and in which nothing is sold excepting food, drinks, tobaccos, candies, and items of souvenir merchandise depicting the theme of the restaurant or the geographical or historic subjects of the nearby area. Any establishment connected with any business wherein any business is conducted, excepting hotel business, limited gaming conducted pursuant to article 30 of this title 44, or the sale of food, drinks, tobaccos, candies, or such items of souvenir merchandise, is declared not to be a restaurant. Nothing in this subsection (47) shall be construed to prohibit the use in a restaurant of orchestras, singers, floor shows, coin-operated music machines, amusement devices that pay nothing of value and cannot by adjustment be made to pay anything of value, or other forms of entertainment commonly provided in restaurants.
- "Retail liquor store" means an establishment engaged only in the sale of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers for consumption off the premises and nonalcohol products, but only if the annual gross revenues from the sale of nonalcohol products do not exceed twenty percent of the retail liquor store establishment's total annual gross sales revenues, as determined in accordance with section 44-3-409 (1)(b).
- "Sales room" means an area in which a licensed winery, pursuant to section 44-3-402 (2); limited winery, pursuant to section 44-3-403 (2)(e); distillery, pursuant to section 44-3-402 (7); or beer wholesaler, pursuant to section 44-3-407 (1)(b), sells and serves alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises, sells alcohol beverages in sealed containers for consumption off the licensed premises, or both.
- "School" means a public, parochial, or nonpublic school that provides a basic academic education in compliance with school attendance laws for students in grades one through twelve. "Basic academic education" has the same meaning as set forth in section 22-33-104 (2)(b).
- "Sealed containers" means any container or receptacle used for holding an alcohol beverage, which container or receptacle is corked or sealed with any stub, stopper, or cap.
- "Sell" or "sale" means any of the following: To exchange, barter, or traffic in; to solicit or receive an order for except through a licensee licensed under this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44; to keep or expose for sale; to serve with meals; to deliver for value or in any way other than gratuitously; to peddle or to possess with intent to sell; to possess or transport in contravention of this article 3; to traffic in for any consideration promised or obtained, directly or indirectly.
- "Sell at wholesale" means selling to any other than the intended consumer of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors. "Sell at wholesale" shall not be construed to prevent a brewer or wholesale beer dealer from selling malt liquors to the intended consumer, thereof, or to prevent a licensed manufacturer or importer from selling malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors to a licensed wholesaler.
- "Spirituous liquors" means any alcohol beverage obtained by distillation, mixed with water and other substances in solution, and includes among other things brandy, rum, whiskey, gin, powdered alcohol, and every liquid or solid, patented or not, containing at least one-half of one percent alcohol by volume and which is fit for use for beverage purposes. Any liquid or solid containing beer or wine in combination with any other liquor, except as provided in subsections (30) and (59) of this section, shall not be construed to be fermented malt or malt or vinous liquor but shall be construed to be spirituous liquor.
- "State licensing authority" means the executive director or the deputy director of the department if the executive director so designates.
- "Tastings" means the sampling of malt, vinous, or spiritous liquors that may occur on the premises of a retail liquor store licensee or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee by adult patrons of the licensee pursuant to the provisions of section 44-3-301 (10).
- "Tavern" means an establishment serving alcohol beverages in which the principal business is the sale of alcohol beverages at retail for consumption on the premises and where sandwiches and light snacks are available for consumption on the premises.
- "Tax-paid wine" means vinous liquors on which federal excise taxes have been paid.
-
-
"Vinous liquors" means wine and fortified wines that:
- Contain not less than one-half of one percent and not more than twenty-one percent alcohol by volume; and
- Are produced by the fermentation of the natural sugar contents of fruits or other agricultural products containing sugar.
- For the purpose of simplifying the administration of this article 3, sake is deemed a vinous liquor.
-
"Vinous liquors" means wine and fortified wines that:
- "Vintner's restaurant" means a retail establishment that sells food for consumption on the premises and that manufactures not more than nine hundred twenty-five thousand gallons of wine on its premises or licensed alternating proprietor licensed premises, combined, each calendar year.
- "Winery" means any establishment where vinous liquors are manufactured; except that the term does not include a vintner's restaurant licensed pursuant to section 44-3-422.
Source: L. 2018: (59) amended, (SB 18-079), ch. 120, p. 822, § 1, effective August 8; (42) amended, (HB 18-1024), ch. 26, p. 321, § 6, effective October 1; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 951, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (3), (5), (6), (30), and (40)(b) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 5, § 4, effective January 31; (15)(a), (15)(c)(X), and (15)(c)(XI) amended and (15)(x)(XII) added, (SB 19-141), ch. 207, p. 2204, § 1, effective August 2. L. 2020: (3) and (60) amended, (HB 20-1055), ch. 15, p. 67, § 1, effective September 14. L. 2021: (11.5) added, (HB 21-1027), ch. 290, p. 1714, § 2, effective June 22; (14)(b) and (60) amended, (SB 21-270), ch. 479, p. 3422, § 1, effective September 7; (38) amended, (HB 21-1044), ch. 165, p. 925, § 1, effective September 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-103 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsection (42) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-103 (25) in HB 18-1024. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (59) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-103 (39) in SB 18-079. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Definition of words "sell" or "sale", in subsection (24), must be considered in light of the purpose underlying this article. Contemporary Enters., Inc. v. Charnes, 44 Colo. App. 26, 613 P.2d 339 (1980).
Words "distinct" and "definite" in subsection (15) should be given their ordinary and generally accepted meanings. Denial of request for modification, where premises would still be distinct and definite as those terms are ordinarily defined, is arbitrary and capricious. East 40th Corp. v. City of Aurora, 746 P.2d 55 (Colo. App. 1987).
The operation of shuffleboards for gain or profit constitutes a business within the meaning of subsection (21) and is prohibited by law in restaurants where liquor is sold with meals. City and County of Denver v. Gushurst, 120 Colo. 465, 210 P.2d 616 (1949).
The playing of the game of shuffleboard does not come within the exceptions in subsection (21) and cannot be considered as an ancillary or auxiliary activity in aid of the main business of serving meals, but on the contrary is a separate and distinct business wholly incompatible with the type of restaurant defined in that subsection. City and County of Denver v. Gushurst, 120 Colo. 465, 210 P.2d 616 (1949).
The presence and operation of a "Chicago Coin Pistol" machine constitutes a separate and distinct business and is prohibited in restaurants which are licensed to sell intoxicating liquor by the drink. MacArthur v. Wyscaver, 120 Colo. 525, 211 P.2d 556 (1949); City and County of Denver v. Gushurst, 120 Colo. 465, 210 P.2d 616 (1949).
Pizza Hut outlets are restaurants and not stores or mercantile establishments. Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Dolan, 619 P.2d 508 (Colo. App. 1980).
The sale of cigarettes, mints, and salad dressings does not exclude Pizza Hut outlets from the category of restaurants. Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Dolan, 619 P.2d 508 (Colo. App. 1980).
Sale of "charge-a-drink" cards did not constitute sale of liquor under article. The activities of a company which sold "charge-a-drink" cards which entitled the holder to obtain, without charge, one drink worth up to $2 at each of 40 restaurants and lounges did not constitute the sale of liquor under the terms of this article. Contemporary Enters., Inc. v. Charnes, 44 Colo. App. 26, 613 P.2d 339 (1980).
Applied in Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
44-3-104. Wine shipments - permits.
-
- The holder of a winery direct shipper's permit may sell and deliver wine that is produced or bottled by the permittee to a personal consumer located in Colorado.
- The holder of a winery direct shipper's permit may not sell or ship wine to a minor, as defined in section 2-4-401 (6).
-
A winery direct shipper's permit may be issued to only a person who applies for such permit to the state licensing authority and who:
- Operates a winery located in the United States and holds all state and federal licenses, permits, or both, necessary to operate the winery, including the federal winemaker's and blender's basic permit;
- Expressly submits to personal jurisdiction in Colorado state and federal courts for civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings and expressly submits to venue in the city and county of Denver, Colorado, as proper venue for any proceedings that may be initiated by or against the state licensing authority; and
- Except as provided in sections 44-3-402 (1) and 44-3-407 (3), does not directly or indirectly have any financial interest in a Colorado wholesaler or retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-407, 44-3-409, or 44-3-410.
-
-
All wine sold or shipped by the holder of a winery direct shipper's permit shall be in a package that is clearly and conspicuously labeled, showing that:
- The package contains wine; and
- The package may be delivered only to a person who is twenty-one years of age or older.
-
Wine sold or shipped by a holder of a winery direct shipper's permit may not be delivered to any person other than:
- The person who purchased the wine;
- A recipient designated in advance by such purchaser; or
- A person who is twenty-one years of age or older.
-
Wine may be delivered only to a person who is twenty-one years of age or older after the person accepting the package:
- Presents valid proof of identity and age; and
- Personally signs a receipt acknowledging delivery of the package.
-
All wine sold or shipped by the holder of a winery direct shipper's permit shall be in a package that is clearly and conspicuously labeled, showing that:
- The holder of a winery direct shipper's permit shall maintain records of all sales and deliveries made under the permit in accordance with section 44-3-701.
- A personal consumer purchasing wine from the holder of a winery direct shipper's permit may not resell the wine.
- The state licensing authority may adopt rules and forms necessary to implement this section.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 958, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-104 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-105. Local option.
The operation of this article 3 shall be statewide unless any municipality or city and county, by a majority of the registered electors of any municipality or city and county, voting at any regular election or special election called for that purpose in accordance with the election laws of this state, decides against the right to sell alcohol beverages or to limit the sale of alcohol beverages to any one or more of the classes of licenses as provided by this article 3 within their respective limits. The local option question shall be submitted only upon a petition signed by not less than fifteen percent of the registered electors in the municipality or city and county; otherwise, the procedure with reference to the calling and holding of the elections shall be substantially in accordance with the election laws of the state. The expenses of the election shall be borne by the municipality or city and county in which the elections are held. The question of prohibition of sale of alcohol beverages or the limitation of sales to any one or more of the classes of licenses provided in this article 3 shall not be submitted to the registered electors more than once in any four-year period.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 959, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-105 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Exclusive method. It is not the law that a majority of the people of a locality must favor the issuance of a liquor license before it may be granted; and this section provides the only method by which the electorate may decide for or against the right to sell intoxicating liquors. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961); Farmer v. City Council, 153 Colo. 306, 385 P.2d 596 (1963).
Under the local option provisions of the liquor code cities may be "dry" in counties that are otherwise "wet". Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
There is no such thing under the law as county-wide local option. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
44-3-106. Exemptions.
- The provisions of this article 3 shall not apply to the sale or distribution of sacramental wines sold and used for religious purposes.
-
- Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, when permitted by federal law and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, an adult may produce, for personal use and not for sale, an amount of malt or vinous liquor equal to the amount that is exempt from the federal excise tax on the alcohol beverage when produced by an adult for personal use and not for sale.
- The production of malt or vinous liquors under the circumstances set forth in this subsection (2) shall be in strict conformity with federal law and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto.
- Malt or vinous liquors produced pursuant to this subsection (2) shall be exempt from any tax imposed by this article 3, and the producer shall not be required to obtain any license provided by this article 3.
- Malt liquors or vinous liquors produced in accordance with this subsection (2) may be transported and delivered by the producer to any licensed premises where consumption of malt liquors or vinous liquors by persons at least twenty-one years of age is authorized for use at organized affairs, exhibitions, or competitions, such as home brew or wine-making contests, tastings, or judgings. To claim this exemption, consumption must be limited solely to the participants in and judges of the events. Malt liquors or vinous liquors used for the purposes described in this subsection (2)(d) must also be served in portions not exceeding six ounces and must not be sold, offered for sale, or made available for consumption by the general public.
-
-
The provisions of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, with the exception of the requirements of section 44-3-503, shall not apply to the occasional sale of an alcohol beverage to any individual twenty-one years of age or older at public auction by any person where the auction sale is for the purpose of disposing of the alcohol beverage as may lawfully have come into the possession of the person in the due course of the person's regular business in the following manner:
- By reason of the failure of the owner of the alcohol beverage to claim the same or to furnish instructions as to the disposition thereof;
- By reason of the foreclosure of any lawful lien upon the alcohol beverage by the person in accordance with lawful procedure;
- By reason of salvage of the alcohol beverage, in the case of carriers, from shipments damaged in transit;
- By reason of a lawful donation of the alcohol beverage to an organization qualifying under section 44-5-102 for a special event permit; except that no more than four public auctions per year shall be conducted pursuant to this subsection (3)(a)(IV).
- The state licensing authority shall be presented records of all transactions referred to in subsection (3)(a) of this section.
-
The provisions of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, with the exception of the requirements of section 44-3-503, shall not apply to the occasional sale of an alcohol beverage to any individual twenty-one years of age or older at public auction by any person where the auction sale is for the purpose of disposing of the alcohol beverage as may lawfully have come into the possession of the person in the due course of the person's regular business in the following manner:
-
Any individual twenty-one years of age or older entering this state from another state or a foreign country may lawfully possess for personal use and not for sale alcohol beverages without liability for the Colorado excise tax on the alcohol beverages up to the following amounts:
- Two and one-fourth gallons, or two hundred eighty-eight ounces, of malt liquor;
- Two and one-fourth gallons, or two hundred eighty-eight ounces, of hard cider;
- Nine liters of vinous liquor; and
- Six liters of spiritous liquor.
- This article 3 shall not apply to state institutions of higher education when the institutions are engaged in the manufacture of vinous liquor on alternating proprietor licensed premises or premises licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403, for the purpose of enology research and education.
- This article 3 does not apply to a state institution of higher education when the institution is engaged in the manufacture and tasting, at the place of manufacture or at a licensed premises, of malt liquors for teaching or research purposes, so long as the malt liquor is not sold or offered for sale and is only tasted by a qualified student, qualified employee, or expert taster. Any unused malt liquor product that is produced by a state institution of higher education in accordance with this subsection (6) must be removed from a licensed premises at the end of an event if the event is held at a licensed premises located off campus.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 960, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2)(a), (2)(b), and (2)(c) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 6, § 5, effective January 31. L. 2022: (4) amended, (HB 22-1017), ch. 47, p. 227, § 1, effective August 10.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-106 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-107. Permitted acts - auctions at special events - definition.
- Any person who has an interest in a liquor license may also be listed as an officer or director on a license owned by a municipality or governmental entity if the person does not individually manage or receive any direct financial benefit from the operation of such license.
-
-
An organization that is holding a special event pursuant to article 5 of this title 44 may, subject to the requirements of subsection (2)(b) of this section:
- Bring onto and remove from the licensed premises or unlicensed premises where the special event is held alcohol beverages in sealed containers that were donated to or otherwise lawfully obtained by the organization for fund-raising purposes; and
- Auction the alcohol beverages in sealed containers for fund-raising purposes while on the licensed premises or unlicensed premises where the special event is held.
-
- An organization holding a special event and, if the special event is held on a licensed premises, the licensee on whose licensed premises the special event is held, or, if the special event is held on unlicensed premises, the person on whose unlicensed premises the special event is held, shall ensure that any alcohol beverages in sealed containers brought onto, auctioned at, or removed from the premises remain sealed at all times while on the premises.
- The licensee on whose licensed premises the special event is held or the person on whose unlicensed premises the special event is held, as applicable, shall not require or accept any fee for, percentage or portion of the proceeds from, or other financial benefit specifically related to the auction of alcohol beverages in sealed containers on the premises.
- The retail value of alcohol beverages donated to an organization pursuant to this section by a retailer licensed under section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c) to sell alcohol beverages at retail for consumption off the licensed premises does not count against the annual limit on purchases from those retailers specified in section 44-3-411 (2), 44-3-413 (7)(b), 44-3-414 (2), 44-3-416 (2), 44-3-417 (3), 44-3-418 (2), 44-3-419 (4), 44-3-420 (2), 44-3-422 (3), 44-3-426 (4)(b), or 44-3-428 (2).
-
- A retailer licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 that donates alcohol beverages to an organization pursuant to this section is not liable for any violation of section 44-3-901 committed by the organization or other person on the premises where the special event is held or involving the donated alcohol beverages if the licensed retailer that donated the alcohol beverages was not involved in the violation and did not engage in any act or omission that constitutes an unlawful act under section 44-3-901.
- The state and local licensing authorities shall consider mitigating factors, including a licensee's lack of knowledge of a violation, in determining whether to hold a licensee on whose licensed premises the special event was held responsible for any violation of section 44-3-901 that occurred on the licensed premises and that was committed by the organization holding the special event.
-
As used in this subsection (2), "organization" means an organization described in section 44-5-102 (1):
- That obtains a special event permit under article 5 of this title 44 to hold a special event on a premises licensed under section 44-3-403, 44-3-404, 44-3-413 (3), 44-3-418, 44-3-419, or 44-3-424;
- That is holding a special event at a retail premises licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises; or
- That is otherwise exempt from article 5 of this title 44 pursuant to section 44-5-108.
-
An organization that is holding a special event pursuant to article 5 of this title 44 may, subject to the requirements of subsection (2)(b) of this section:
Source: L. 2018: Entire section amended, (SB 18-067), ch. 4, p. 29, § 1, effective March 1; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 961, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-107 as it existed prior to 2018.
- This section was numbered as § 12-47-107 in SB 18-067. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
PART 2 STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY - DUTIES
44-3-201. State licensing authority - creation.
- For the purpose of regulating and controlling the licensing of the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcohol beverages in this state, there is hereby created the state licensing authority, which shall be the executive director or the deputy director if the executive director so designates.
- The executive director shall be the chief administrative officer of the state licensing authority and may employ, pursuant to section 13 of article XII of the state constitution, clerks and inspectors as may be determined to be necessary.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 962, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: Entire section amended, (SB 19-241), ch. 390, p. 3478, § 60, effective August 2.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-201 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Applied in Adams County Golf, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 199 Colo. 423, 610 P.2d 97 (1980) (decided under former law).
44-3-202. Duties of state licensing authority.
-
The state licensing authority shall:
- Grant or refuse licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcohol beverages as provided by law and suspend or revoke such licenses upon a violation of this article 3, article 4 or 5 of this title 44, or any rule adopted pursuant to those articles;
- Make general rules and special rulings and findings as necessary for the proper regulation and control of the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcohol beverages and for the enforcement of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 and alter, amend, repeal, and publish the same from time to time;
- Hear and determine at public hearing all complaints against any licensee and administer oaths and issue subpoenas to require the presence of persons and production of papers, books, and records necessary to the determination of any hearing so held;
- Keep complete records of all acts and transactions of the state licensing authority, which records, except confidential reports obtained from the licensee showing the sales volume or quantity of alcohol beverages sold or stamps purchased or customers served, shall be open for inspection by the public;
- Prepare and transmit annually, in the form and manner prescribed by the heads of the principal departments pursuant to section 24-1-136, a report accounting to the governor for the efficient discharge of all responsibilities assigned by law or directive to the state licensing authority;
- Notify all persons to whom wholesale licenses have been issued as to applications for licenses and renewals of the licenses provided in sections 44-3-409 to 44-3-420 and 44-4-104 (1).
-
-
-
Rules adopted pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section may cover, without limitation, the following subjects:
(2) (a) (I) Rules adopted pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section may cover, without limitation, the following subjects:
- Compliance with or enforcement or violation of any provision of this article 3, article 4 or 5 of this title 44, or any rule issued pursuant to those articles;
- Specifications of duties of officers and employees;
- Instructions for local licensing authorities and law enforcement officers;
- All forms necessary or convenient in the administration of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44;
- Inspections, investigations, searches, seizures, and activities as may become necessary from time to time, including a range of penalties for use by licensing authorities, which shall include aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered, when licensees' employees violate certain provisions of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44, including the sale or service of alcohol beverages to persons under twenty-one years of age or to visibly intoxicated persons;
- Limitation of number of licensees as to any area or vicinity;
- Misrepresentation, unfair practices, and unfair competition;
- Control of signs and other displays on licensed premises;
- Use of screens;
- Identification of licensees and their employees;
- Storage, warehouses, and transportation;
- Health and sanitary requirements;
- Standards of cleanliness, orderliness, and decency, and sampling and analysis of products;
- Standards of purity and labeling;
- Records to be kept by licensees and availability thereof;
- Practices unduly designed to increase the consumption of alcohol beverages;
- Implementation, standardization, and enforcement of alternating proprietor licensed premises. The state licensing authority shall consult with interested parties from the alcohol beverage industry in developing appropriate rules to ensure adequate oversight and regulation of alternating proprietor licensed premises.
- Such other matters as are necessary for the fair, impartial, stringent, and comprehensive administration of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44;
- Repealed.
- Sales rooms operated by licensed wineries, distilleries, limited wineries, or beer wholesalers, including the manner by which a licensee operating a sales room notifies the state licensing authority of its sales rooms, the content of the notice, and any other necessary provisions related to the notice requirement.
- Nothing in this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 shall be construed as delegating to the state licensing authority the power to fix prices. The licensing authority shall make no rule that would abridge the right of any licensee to fairly, honestly, and lawfully advertise the place of business of or the commodities sold by such licensee. All rules shall be reasonable and just.
-
Rules adopted pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section may cover, without limitation, the following subjects:
(2) (a) (I) Rules adopted pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section may cover, without limitation, the following subjects:
-
-
- The state licensing authority shall make no rule regulating or prohibiting the sale of alcohol beverages on credit offered or extended by a licensee to a retailer where the credit is offered or extended for thirty days or less. The state licensing authority shall enforce the prohibition against extending credit for more than thirty days for the sale of alcohol beverages pursuant to 27 CFR 6 and may adopt rules regulating or prohibiting the sale of alcohol beverages on credit where the credit is offered or extended for more than thirty days, consistent with the federal regulations. (b) (I) (A) The state licensing authority shall make no rule regulating or prohibiting the sale of alcohol beverages on credit offered or extended by a licensee to a retailer where the credit is offered or extended for thirty days or less. The state licensing authority shall enforce the prohibition against extending credit for more than thirty days for the sale of alcohol beverages pursuant to 27 CFR 6 and may adopt rules regulating or prohibiting the sale of alcohol beverages on credit where the credit is offered or extended for more than thirty days, consistent with the federal regulations.
- Nothing in this subsection (2)(b)(I) allows the state licensing authority to adopt a rule that restricts the ability of a licensee to, or prohibits a licensee from, making sales of alcohol beverages, on a cash-on-delivery basis, to a retailer who is or may be in arrears in payments to a licensee for prior alcohol beverage sales.
- Licensees shall comply with the prohibition against extending credit to a retailer for more than thirty days for the sale of alcohol beverages, including beer, contained in 27 CFR 6 and with rules adopted by the state licensing authority that are consistent with 27 CFR 6.
- Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410 on or after January 1, 2017, shall not purchase alcohol beverages on credit or accept an offer or extension of credit from a licensee and shall effect payment upon delivery of the alcohol beverages.
- As used in this subsection (2)(b), "licensee" shall have the same meaning as "industry member", as defined in 27 CFR 6.11, and includes a person engaged in business as a distiller, brewer, rectifier, blender, or other producer; as an importer or wholesaler of alcohol beverages; or as a bottler or warehouseman and bottler of spiritous liquors.
-
-
- In any hearing held by the state licensing authority pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44, no person may refuse, upon request of the state licensing authority, to testify or provide other information on the ground of self-incrimination; but no testimony or other information produced in the hearing or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information may be used against such person in any criminal prosecution based on a violation of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 except a prosecution for perjury in the first degree committed in so testifying. Continued refusal to testify or provide other information shall constitute grounds for suspension or revocation of any license granted pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 962, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-202 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (2)(a)(I)(S) provided for the repeal of subsection (2)(a)(I)(S), effective January 1, 2019. (See L. 2016, pp. 1530, 1539.)
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. Since § 44-2-202 is similar to §§ 12-46-105 and 12-47-105 as they existed prior to the 1997 amendment of articles 46 and 47 of title 12, which resulted in the relocation of provisions, and to former § 12-47-202, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.
State licensing authority has jurisdiction to revoke expired liquor license. Department may revoke a license upon a violation of this article or a rule promulgated under this article. This article is silent concerning when the proceedings must be completed; therefore, the state licensing authority has jurisdiction to revoke a license so long as the violation occurs before the license expires. Trappers Lake Lodge & Resort, LLC v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 179 P.3d 198 (Colo. App. 2007).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-105.
No untrammeled authority. An agency empowered with discretion to grant or deny a fermented malt beverage license does not have untrammeled power; it too is subject to standards and delimitations. Capra v. Davenport, 158 Colo. 537, 408 P.2d 448 (1965).
Nor unbridled discretion. The general assembly in giving to the licensing authority the power to grant or deny a license did not give it unbridled discretion, and did not permit it to exercise such discretion without the application of the standards upon which its conclusion was to be exercised. Capra v. Davenport, 158 Colo. 537, 408 P.2d 448 (1965).
Prima facie right to license established. Where an applicant establishes a prima facie right to a license to dispense 3.2 beer at its race track, and the only evidence before the commissioners in opposition thereto is incompetent and irrelevant, the license should be granted. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
Denial because of neighborhood arbitrary and capricious. The denial of a license to dispense 3.2 beer to a kennel club on the ground that the reasonable requirements of a neighborhood do not warrant issuance thereof is not supported by evidence where the neighborhood is not supplied at all and that there are no such outlets within a radius of five miles, and is arbitrary and capricious. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
Department acts capriciously and arbitrarily without proper statutory framework. Where there is no statutory framework within which a transfer application for a 3.2 percent license can properly be denied, the department acts capriciously and arbitrarily in denying the application. Adams County Golf, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 199 Colo. 423, 610 P.2d 97 (1980).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-47-105.
Authority granted to director to define criminal conduct is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. Although the general assembly may not delegate to an administrative agency the power to define criminal conduct, it may authorize the agency to adopt rules carrying criminal sanctions as long as the statutory scheme provides sufficient standards and safeguards to protect against the unreasonable exercise of discretionary power and offers adequate notice of the penalties applicable to a violator. People v. Lowrie, 761 P.2d 778 (Colo. 1988).
Enabling legislation which charges the director to adopt rules and regulations not only with respect to the sale of alcoholic beverages in licensed taverns but also in relation to practices unduly designed to increase the consumption of alcoholic beverages provides sufficient standards and safeguards to protect the public against the unreasonable exercise of the director's power. Prohibiting the service of alcoholic beverages to intoxicated persons and the performance of certain live entertainment are therefore constitutional and not an unauthorized delegation of legislative authority. People v. Lowrie, 761 P.2d 778 (Colo. 1988).
The licensing authority is charged with the duty and task of determining whether a license should be granted or denied. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The Colorado liquor code does not authorize a conspiracy to fix prices to the injury of competitors. United States v. Colo. Whsle. Wine & Liquor Dealers Ass'n, 47 F. Supp. 160 (D. Colo. 1942), aff'd sub nom. United States v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc., 324 U.S. 293, 65 S. Ct. 661, 89 L. Ed. 951 (1945).
Licensee presumed to know regulations. Having applied for and received a license pursuant to the state liquor code, a licensee is presumed to know the regulations governing use of that license. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
Regulation prohibiting employees of liquor licensee from soliciting drinks was not overbroad and was reasonably related to a valid exercise of police power. 4-D Bros. v. Heckers, 33 Colo. App. 421, 522 P.2d 749 (1974).
Regulation of department of revenue, prohibiting liquor establishment licensee from employing a person to "mingle with patrons" and personally solicit the purchase or sale of drinks for use of one soliciting, was a proper exercise of authority delegated by the general assembly. People v. Willson, 187 Colo. 141, 528 P.2d 1315 (1974).
Validity of credit sales recognized. No rules or regulations pertaining to sales on credit have been promulgated by the state licensing authority; however, it is clear that the validity of credit sales is recognized. Majestic Marketing Co. v. Anderson Enters. of Colo., Inc., 32 Colo. App. 369, 511 P.2d 943 (1973).
An applicant for a liquor license is entitled to a hearing on application, and if refused, to be advised of the reasons therefor. Sheeley v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 137 Colo. 350, 325 P.2d 275 (1958).
The action of the board in failing to hold a hearing and in refusing to give reasons for denial of a license is improper. Sheeley v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 137 Colo. 350, 325 P.2d 275 (1958).
Where a hearing has been held but no record made by the board, no judicial determination can be made as to whether the denial of an application itself is arbitrary and capricious, and that the courts should not in such a case order the board to issue a license but should remand the matter to the board for a hearing, the taking and recording of evidence and the making of specific findings of fact. Sheeley v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 137 Colo. 350, 325 P.2d 275 (1958).
Remand for hearing proper. In an action to compel a board of county commissioners to issue a liquor license, where it is shown that the board refused to issue the license but held no hearing and gave no reasons for such refusal, an order requiring the applicant to republish his notice and directing the board to hold a regular hearing thereon with a court reporter present is proper, since a liquor license cannot be secured by default. Sheeley v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 137 Colo. 350, 325 P.2d 275 (1958).
Director's request to see documents not violative of secrecy of grand jury. Request by director to see documents, which had been, or may at some time be, shown to a grand jury, which was examining books and records of liquor outlets but had not as yet returned an indictment, did not violate the policy of secrecy surrounding grand jury proceedings. Granbery v. District Court 187 Colo. 316, 531 P.2d 390 (1975).
Regulations under the liquor code are presumed to be valid, and the burden is upon the party challenging the constitutionality to establish by a clear and convincing showing beyond a reasonable doubt an asserted invalidity. C.V. Enters., Inc. v. State, Dept. of Rev., 42 Colo. App. 337, 593 P.2d 984 (1979).
Sale of "charge-a-drink" cards did not constitute sale of liquor. A company which sold "charge-a-drink" cards, which entitled holder to obtain, without charge, one drink worth up to $2 at each of 40 restaurants and lounges was not a liquor retailer since its activities do not constitute a sale of liquor under the terms of this article. Contemporary Enters., Inc. v. Charnes, 44 Colo. App. 26, 613 P.2d 339 (1980).
Applied in People ex rel. Heckers v. District Court, 170 Colo. 533, 463 P.2d 310 (1970); Citizens for Free Enter. v. Dept. of Rev., 649 P.2d 1054 (Colo. 1982).
44-3-203. Performance of duties.
- The performance of the functions or activities set forth in this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 shall be subject to available appropriations; but nothing in this section shall be construed to remove from the state licensing authority the responsibility for performing such functions or activities in accordance with law at the level of funding provided.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, the state shall be the final interpretive authority as it relates to this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 and the rules promulgated thereunder, concerning persons licensed pursuant to this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 as wholesalers, manufacturers, importers, and public transportation system licensees.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 965, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-203 as it existed prior to 2018.
PART 3 STATE AND LOCAL LICENSING
44-3-301. Licensing in general.
- No local licensing authority shall issue a license provided for in this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 until that share of the license fee due the state has been received by the department. All licenses granted pursuant to this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of their issuance unless revoked or suspended pursuant to section 44-3-601 or 44-3-306.
-
- Before granting any license, all licensing authorities shall consider, except where this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 specifically provide otherwise, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood, the desires of the adult inhabitants as evidenced by petitions, remonstrances, or otherwise, and all other reasonable restrictions that are or may be placed upon the neighborhood by the local licensing authority. With respect to a second or additional license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w) or 44-3-412 (1) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4) for the same licensee, all licensing authorities shall consider the effect on competition of the granting or disapproving of additional licenses to such licensee and shall not approve an application for a second or additional license that would have the effect of restraining competition.
- A local licensing authority or the state on state-owned property may deny the issuance of any new tavern or retail liquor store license whenever such authority determines that the issuance of the license would result in or add to an undue concentration of the same class of license and, as a result, require the use of additional law enforcement resources.
- The state licensing authority shall approve the proposed premises for a winery applying pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403, which premises includes up to two noncontiguous locations used for manufacturing vinous liquors, or a modification of the licensed premises of a winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403 to include up to two noncontiguous locations used for manufacturing vinous liquors if the alcohol and tobacco tax and trade bureau of the United States department of the treasury has approved the description and diagram of the proposed or modified premises. Additionally, with the initial license application that includes noncontiguous locations within the proposed premises or a subsequent application to modify the premises to include noncontiguous locations, the winery licensee must submit proof from the municipality in which the premises is located of compliance with all applicable zoning, building, fire, and other requirements for occupancy and operation. The state licensing authority may, by rule, establish a one-time application fee and an annual renewal fee, neither of which may exceed five hundred dollars per location, for applications under this subsection (2)(c).
-
-
- Each license issued under this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 is separate and distinct. It is unlawful for any person to exercise any of the privileges granted under any license other than the license the person holds or for any licensee to allow any other person to exercise the privileges granted under the licensee's license, except as provided in section 44-3-402 (3), 44-3-403 (2)(a), 44-3-404, or 44-3-417 (1)(b). A separate license must be issued for each specific business or business entity and each geographic location, and in the license the particular alcohol beverages the applicant is authorized to manufacture or sell must be named and described. (3) (a) (I) Each license issued under this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 is separate and distinct. It is unlawful for any person to exercise any of the privileges granted under any license other than the license the person holds or for any licensee to allow any other person to exercise the privileges granted under the licensee's license, except as provided in section 44-3-402 (3), 44-3-403 (2)(a), 44-3-404, or 44-3-417 (1)(b). A separate license must be issued for each specific business or business entity and each geographic location, and in the license the particular alcohol beverages the applicant is authorized to manufacture or sell must be named and described.
-
For purposes of this section, each of the following is considered a single business and location:
- A resort complex with common ownership;
- A campus liquor complex;
- A hotel and restaurant licensee with optional premises;
- An optional premises licensee for optional premises located on an outdoor sports and recreational facility;
- A winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403 that has noncontiguous locations included in the licensed premises; and
- A festival at which more than one licensee participates pursuant to a festival permit.
- At all times a licensee shall possess and maintain possession of the premises or optional premises for which the license is issued by ownership, lease, rental, or other arrangement for possession of the premises.
-
-
- The licenses provided pursuant to this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 shall specify the date of issuance, the period which is covered, the name of the licensee, the premises or optional premises licensed, the optional premises in the case of a hotel and restaurant license, and the alcohol beverages that may be sold on the premises or optional premises. The license shall be conspicuously placed at all times on the licensed premises or optional premises, and all sheriffs and police officers shall see to it that every person selling alcohol beverages within their jurisdiction has procured a license to do so.
- No local licensing authority shall issue, transfer location of, or renew any license to sell any alcohol beverages until the person applying for the license produces a license issued and granted by the state licensing authority covering the whole period for which a license or license renewal is sought.
- In computing any period of time prescribed by this article 3, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be counted as any other day.
-
- Licensees at facilities owned by a municipality, county, or special district or at publicly or privately owned sports and entertainment venues with a minimum seating capacity of one thousand five hundred seats may possess and serve for on-premises consumption any type of alcohol beverage as may be permitted pursuant to guidelines established by the local and state licensing authorities, and the licensees need not have meals available for consumption.
- Nothing in this article 3 shall prohibit a licensee at a sports and entertainment venue described in subsection (6)(a) of this section from selling or providing alcohol beverages in sealed containers, as authorized by the license in effect, to adult occupants of luxury boxes located at stadiums, arenas, and similar sports and entertainment venues that are included within the licensed premises of the licensee. However, no person shall be allowed to leave the licensed premises with a sealed container of alcohol beverage that was obtained in the luxury box. As used in this subsection (6)(b), "luxury box" means a limited public access room or booth that is used by its occupants and their guests at sports and entertainment venues that are provided within the licensed premises.
- A licensee shall report each transfer or change of financial interest in the license to the state licensing authority and, for retail licenses, to the local licensing authority within thirty days after the transfer or change. A report shall be required for transfers of capital stock of a public corporation; except that a report shall not be required for transfers of such stock totaling less than ten percent in any one year, but any transfer of a controlling interest shall be reported regardless of size. It is unlawful for the licensee to fail to report a transfer required by this subsection (7). Failure to report shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of the license.
-
Each licensee holding a fermented malt beverage on-premises license or on- and off-premises license, beer and wine license, hotel and restaurant license, tavern license, lodging and entertainment license, club license, arts license, or racetrack license shall manage the premises himself or herself or employ a separate and distinct manager on the premises and shall report the name of the manager to the state and local licensing authorities. The licensee shall report any change in managers to the state and local licensing authorities within thirty days after the change. When a hotel and restaurant, tavern, or lodging and entertainment licensee reports a change in manager to the state and local licensing authority, the licensee shall pay:
- A thirty-dollar fee to the state licensing authority; and
- A thirty-dollar fee to the local licensing authority.
-
-
- Subject to subsections (9)(a)(I)(B) and (9)(a)(I)(C) of this section, a licensee may move its permanent location to any other place in the same city, town, or city and county for which the license was originally granted, or in the same county if the license was granted for a place outside the corporate limits of any city, town, or city and county, but it is unlawful to sell any alcohol beverage at the new location until permission is granted by the state and local licensing authorities.
- The state and local licensing authorities shall not grant permission under this subsection (9)(a)(I) to a fermented malt beverage retailer licensed under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) to move its permanent location if the new location is: Within one thousand five hundred feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409; for a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409; or, for a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer that is contiguous to the city and county of Denver, within one thousand five hundred feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409.
- The state and local licensing authorities shall not grant permission under this subsection (9)(a)(I) to a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409 to move its permanent location if the new location is: Within one thousand five hundred feet of another retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409; for a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of another retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409; or, for a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer that is contiguous to the city and county of Denver, within one thousand five hundred feet of another retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409.
-
- In permitting a change of location, the licensing authorities shall consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood to which the applicant seeks to change his or her location, the desires of the adult inhabitants as evidenced by petitions, remonstrances, or otherwise, and all reasonable restrictions that are or may be placed upon the new district by the council, board of trustees, or licensing authority of the city, town, or city and county or by the board of county commissioners of any county.
- If the state and local licensing authorities approve an application for a change of location submitted under subsection (9)(a)(II) of this section by a retail liquor store licensed on or before January 1, 2016, the licensee must change the location of its premises within three years after the approval is granted.
-
-
- The provisions of this subsection (10) shall only apply within a county, city and county, or municipality if the governing body of the county, city and county, or municipality adopts an ordinance or resolution authorizing tastings pursuant to this subsection (10). The ordinance or resolution may provide for stricter limits than this subsection (10) on the number of tastings per year per licensee, the days on which tastings may occur, or the number of hours each tasting may last.
- A retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee who wishes to conduct tastings may submit an application or application renewal to the local licensing authority. The local licensing authority may reject the application if the applicant fails to establish that he or she is able to conduct tastings without violating the provisions of this section or creating a public safety risk to the neighborhood. A local licensing authority may establish its own application procedure and may charge a reasonable application fee.
-
Tastings are subject to the following limitations:
-
Tastings shall be conducted only:
- By a person who: Has completed a server training program that meets the standards established by the liquor enforcement division in the department and is a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee, an employee of a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee, or a representative, employee, or agent of the licensed wholesaler, brew pub, distillery pub, manufacturer, limited winery, importer, or vintner's restaurant promoting the alcohol beverages for the tasting; and
- On a licensee's licensed premises.
- The alcohol beverage used in tastings must be purchased through a licensed wholesaler, licensed brew pub, licensed distillery pub, or winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-403 at a cost that is not less than the laid-in cost of the alcohol beverage.
- The size of an individual alcohol sample shall not exceed one ounce of malt or vinous liquor or one-half of one ounce of spirituous liquor.
- Tastings shall not exceed a total of five hours in duration per day, which need not be consecutive.
- The licensee may conduct tastings only during the operating hours in which the licensee on whose premises the tastings occur is permitted to sell alcohol beverages, and in no case earlier than 11 a.m. or later than 9 p.m.
- The licensee shall prohibit patrons from leaving the licensed premises with an unconsumed sample.
- The licensee shall promptly remove all open and unconsumed alcohol beverage samples from the licensed premises, destroy the samples immediately following the completion of the tasting, or store any open containers of unconsumed alcohol beverages in a secure area outside the sales area of the licensed premises for use at a tasting conducted at a later time or date.
- The licensee shall not serve a person who is under twenty-one years of age or who is visibly intoxicated.
- The licensee shall not serve more than four individual samples to a patron during a tasting.
- Alcohol samples shall be in open containers and shall be provided to a patron free of charge.
- The licensee may conduct tastings on no more than one hundred fifty-six days per year.
- No manufacturer of spirituous or vinous liquors shall induce a licensee through free goods or financial or in-kind assistance to favor the manufacturer's products being sampled at a tasting. The retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee bears the financial and all other responsibility for a tasting conducted on its licensed premises.
-
Tastings shall be conducted only:
- A violation of a limitation specified in this subsection (10) by a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee, whether by the licensee's employees, agents, or otherwise or by a representative, employee, or agent of the licensed wholesaler, brew pub, distillery pub, manufacturer, limited winery, importer, or vintner's restaurant that promoted the alcohol beverages for the tasting, is the responsibility of, and section 44-3-801 applies to, the retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee that conducted the tasting.
- A retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee conducting a tasting shall be subject to the same revocation, suspension, and enforcement provisions as otherwise apply to the licensee.
- Nothing in this subsection (10) shall affect the ability of a Colorado winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403 to conduct a tasting pursuant to the authority of section 44-3-402 (2) or 44-3-403 (2)(e).
-
- This subsection (11) applies only within an entertainment district that a governing body of a local licensing authority has created by ordinance or resolution. This subsection (11) does not apply to a special event permit issued under article 5 of this title 44 or the holder thereof unless the permit holder desires to use an existing common consumption area and agrees in writing to the requirements of this article 3 and the local licensing authority concerning the common consumption area.
- A governing body of a local licensing authority may create an entertainment district by adopting an ordinance or resolution. An entertainment district shall not exceed one hundred acres. The ordinance or resolution may impose stricter limits than required by this subsection (11) on the size, security, or hours of operation of any common consumption area created within the entertainment district.
-
- A certified promotional association may operate a common consumption area within an entertainment district and authorize the attachment of a licensed premises to the common consumption area.
-
An association or licensed tavern, lodging and entertainment facility, hotel and restaurant, brew pub, distillery pub, retail gaming tavern, vintner's restaurant, beer and wine licensee, manufacturer or beer wholesaler that operates a sales room, or limited winery that wishes to create a promotional association may submit an application to the local licensing authority. To qualify for certification, the promotional association must:
- Have a board of directors;
- Have at least one director from each licensed premises attached to the common consumption area on the board of directors; and
- Agree to submit annual reports by January 31 of each year to the local licensing authority showing a detailed map of the boundaries of the common consumption area, the common consumption area's hours of operation, a list of attached licensed premises, a list of the directors and officers of the promotional association, security arrangements within the common consumption area, and any violation of this article 3 committed by an attached licensed premises.
-
The local licensing authority may refuse to certify or may decertify a promotional association of a common consumption area if the promotional association:
- Fails to submit the report required by subsection (11)(c)(II)(C) of this section by January 31 of each year;
- Fails to establish that the licensed premises and common consumption area can be operated without violating this article 3 or creating a safety risk to the neighborhood;
- Fails to have at least two licensed premises attached to the common consumption area;
- Fails to obtain or maintain a properly endorsed general liability and liquor liability insurance policy that is reasonably acceptable to the local licensing authority and names the local licensing authority as an additional insured;
- The use is not compatible with the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the adult inhabitants; or
- Violates section 44-3-910.
- A person shall not attach a premises licensed under this article 3 to a common consumption area unless authorized by the local licensing authority. Any noncontiguous location included in the licensed premises of a winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-403 that falls outside the approved boundaries of an entertainment district or a common consumption area authorized pursuant to this subsection (11) shall not be included as part of a certified promotional association or entertainment district even though the licensed premises of that winery is within the entertainment district.
-
- A licensed tavern, lodging and entertainment facility, hotel and restaurant, brew pub, distillery pub, retail gaming tavern, vintner's restaurant, beer and wine licensee, manufacturer or beer wholesaler that operates a sales room, limited winery, or optional premises that wishes to attach to a common consumption area may submit an application to the local licensing authority. To qualify, the licensee must include a request for authority to attach to the common consumption area from the certified promotional association of the common consumption area unless the promotional association does not exist when the application is submitted; if so, the applicant shall request the authority when a promotional association is certified and shall demonstrate to the local licensing authority that the authority has been obtained by the time the applicant's license issued under this article 3 is renewed.
-
The local licensing authority may deauthorize or refuse to authorize or reauthorize a licensee's attachment to a common consumption area if the licensed premises is not within or on the perimeter of the common consumption area and if the licensee:
- Fails to obtain or retain authority to attach to the common consumption area from the certified promotional association;
- Fails to establish that the licensed premises and common consumption area can be operated without violating this article 3 or creating a safety risk to the neighborhood; or
- Violates section 44-3-910.
- A local licensing authority may establish application procedures and a fee for certifying a promotional authority or authorizing attachment to a common consumption area. The authority shall establish the fee in an amount designed to reasonably offset the cost of implementing this subsection (11). Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, a local authority may set the hours during which a common consumption area and attached licensed premises may serve alcohol and the customers may consume alcohol. Before certifying a promotional association, the local licensing authority shall consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood, the desires of the adult inhabitants as evidenced by petitions, remonstrances, or otherwise, and all other reasonable restrictions that are or may be placed upon the neighborhood by the local licensing authority.
-
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, on and after July 1, 2016, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new license under this article 3 authorizing the sale at retail of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in sealed containers for consumption off the licensed premises if the premises for which the retail license is sought is located:
- Within one thousand five hundred feet of another licensed premises licensed to sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors at retail for off-premises consumption;
- For a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of another licensed premises licensed to sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors at retail for off-premises consumption; or
- For a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer that is contiguous to the city and county of Denver, within one thousand five hundred feet of another licensed premises licensed to sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors at retail for off-premises consumption.
-
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, on and after June 4, 2018, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new fermented malt beverage retailer's license under article 4 of this title 44 authorizing the sale at retail of fermented malt beverages in sealed containers for consumption off the licensed premises if the premises for which the retail license is sought is located within five hundred feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409.
-
This subsection (12)(a.5) does not apply to a person that owns or leases a proposed fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises and, as of January 1, 2019, has applied for or received from the municipality, city and county, or county in which the premises are located:
- A building permit for the structure to be used for the fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises, which permit is currently active and will not expire before the completion of the liquor licensing process; or
- A certificate of occupancy for the structure to be used for the fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises.
- For purposes of subsection (12)(a) of this section, a license under this article 3 authorizing the sale at retail of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in sealed containers for consumption off the licensed premises includes a license under this article 3 authorizing the sale of malt and vinous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where the malt and vinous liquors are sold.
- For purposes of determining whether the distance requirements specified in subsections (12)(a) and (12)(a.5) of this section are satisfied, the distance shall be determined by a radius measurement that begins at the principal doorway of the premises for which the application is made and ends at the principal doorway of the other retail licensed premises.
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, on and after July 1, 2016, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new license under this article 3 authorizing the sale at retail of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in sealed containers for consumption off the licensed premises if the premises for which the retail license is sought is located:
Source: L. 2018: (2)(a), (9)(a), (10)(c)(I), (10)(c)(V), (10)(c)(VII), (10)(c)(XI), (10)(c)(XII), (10)(d), and (12) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2195, § 5, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 965, § 2, effective October 1; (8) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2195, § 5, effective July 1, 2019. L. 2019: (3)(a) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 6, § 6, effective January 31; (8) amended, (SB 19-028), ch. 4, p. 24, § 3, effective February 20; (11)(e)(I) amended, (SB 19-141), ch. 207, p. 2204, § 2, effective August 2. L. 2021: (2)(c) added and (3)(a) and (11)(d) amended, (HB 21-1044), ch. 165, p. 925, § 2, effective September 7; (3)(a) amended, (SB 21-082), ch. 195, p. 1044, § 1, effective September 7. L. 2022: (8) amended, (HB 22-1415), ch. 426, p. 3017, § 1, effective June 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-301 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsections (2)(a), (9)(a), (10)(c)(I), (10)(c)(V), (10)(c)(VII), (10)(c)(XI), (10)(c)(XII), (10)(d), and (12) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-301 (2)(a), (9)(a), (10)(c)(I), (10)(c)(V), (10)(c)(VII), (10)(c)(XI), (10)(c)(XII), (10)(d), and (12), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (8) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-301 (8) in SB 18-243. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective July 1, 2019.
- Amendments to subsection (3)(a) by SB 21-082 and HB 21-1044 were harmonized.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. Since § 44-3-301 is similar to §§ 12-46-106, 12-46-108, and 12-47-106 as they existed prior to the 1997 amendment of articles 46 and 47 of title 12, which resulted in the relocation of provisions, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-106.
It was the legislative intent in passing this article to vest a wide discretion in licensing authorities. MacArthur v. Sierota, 122 Colo. 115, 221 P.2d 346 (1950); Geer v. Susman, 134 Colo. 6, 298 P.2d 948 (1956); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957); Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 151 Colo. 115, 376 P.2d 519 (1962); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
In acting on an application for a liquor license, the licensing authority has considerable latitude and broad discretionary power. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Nat'l Tea Co., 149 Colo. 80, 367 P.2d 909 (1962).
No authority to establish local public policy. The wide discretion vested in the licensing authority in granting or denying beverage licenses is not to be construed as authority to establish a local public policy, either by express resolution or by secret agreement contrary to the state statute legalizing the issuance of such licenses. Buddy & Lloyd's Store No. 1, Inc. v. City Council, 139 Colo. 152, 337 P.2d 389 (1959); Sierota v. Scott, 143 Colo. 248, 352 P.2d 671 (1960).
The licensing authority must not act arbitrarily or capriciously. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957).
Nor does it have untrammeled power. An agency empowered with discretion to grant or deny a fermented malt beverage license does not have untrammeled power; it too is subject to standards and delimitations. Capra v. Davenport, 158 Colo. 537, 408 P.2d 448 (1965).
The power to license the sale of alcoholic beverages includes the power to refuse a license, even when the statutory or preliminary requirements are complied with. Geer v. Susman, 134 Colo. 6, 298 P.2d 948 (1956).
The licensing authorities of the state have authority to issue a number of licenses for the sale of fermented malt beverages to a licensee. Big Top, Inc. v. Schooley, 149 Colo. 116, 368 P.2d 201 (1962).
The city and county of Denver could not, under the guise of regulation, prohibit the issuance of more than one license to sell fermented malt beverages where the general assembly, by whom the delegation to regulate was made, has clearly indicated that a licensee may be issued multiple licenses under this article. Big Top, Inc. v. Schooley, 149 Colo. 116, 368 P.2d 201 (1962).
This article authorizes municipalities to make reasonable rules and regulations governing the sale of 3.2 beer. Sierota v. Scott, 143 Colo. 248, 352 P.2d 671 (1960).
Each license application must be determined upon the facts as they exist at the time, not as they may have existed when a previous application was made. Vigil v. Burress, 157 Colo. 507, 404 P.2d 147 (1965).
A licensee under this article does not have a vested right to a renewal. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
The question of renewal becomes one for the exercise of the discretion of the licensing authority and it may refuse to renew such license upon good cause shown. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
A licensing authority may not arbitrarily or summarily deny a renewal. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
What is good cause for denial of license renewal depends upon the circumstances of the case. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
Where county commissioners disregard the evidence presented, the denial of a license is arbitrary and capricious. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Nat'l Tea Co., 149 Colo. 80, 367 P.2d 909 (1962); Hirsch v. Bd. of Trustees, 150 Colo. 50, 370 P.2d 760 (1962).
It is the duty of the local licensing authority to exercise its discretion on the basis of all of the evidence adduced at the hearing on the application, and not from a synopsis of the hearing officer. Big Top, Inc. v. Hoffman, 156 Colo. 362, 399 P.2d 249 (1965).
Doubts resolved in favor of authority. Where the evidence shows the need of an applicant for a license, but not convincingly, the requirement of the community for it, all reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority. Geer v. Susman, 134 Colo. 6, 298 P.2d 948 (1956); City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961); Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 151 Colo. 115, 376 P.2d 519 (1962).
It is the duty of an applicant to make out a prima facie case before the licensing authority, and having made out a prima facie case, then those opposing the granting of the license should have an opportunity to show cause why the license should not be issued. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957).
Lack of hearing, etc., no basis for order to issue license. A finding by the trial court that there was no hearing, no evidence taken, and no consideration on the merits of an application for a liquor license before a board of county commissioners is not sufficient to sanction an order directing the board to issue the license. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957).
Where the record fails to disclose any valid reason for the denial of an application to dispense 3.2 beer, a judgment finding that the board of county commissioners abused its discretion in denying such license and ordering the same to issue was not erroneous. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Skaff, 139 Colo. 452, 340 P.2d 866 (1959).
Refusal where store located close to school. The licensing authority, in its discretion, could refuse to issue a license to sell at retail 3.2 percent beer to an applicant whose store was located only 176 feet from a school with students both above and below the age of 18 who frequented such store. MacArthur v. Sierota, 122 Colo. 115, 221 P.2d 346 (1950).
Where an applicant sought a license to dispense 3.2 beer in a residential neighborhood where a considerable juvenile and teenage problem existed, and such license was denied by the licensing authority on the ground that existing outlets were sufficient to meet the requirements of the community, and that a substantial number of persons living in the area desired that the license be denied, a claim that the licensing authority failed to give candid and honest consideration to the facts before him in the exercise of his discretion falls short of that required to overcome the presumption of validity attending his administrative acts. Geer v. Susman, 134 Colo. 6, 298 P.2d 948 (1956).
Where neighborhood requirements were adequately served. Where record does not reflect that reasonable requirements of neighborhood are not being adequately served by existing 3.2 percent beer outlets, one of which is to be found within distance of one city block from premises of applicant and another within two or three blocks east of applicant's store, denial of application by licensing authority under such circumstances was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Capra v. U-Tote'm of Colo. Inc., 159 Colo. 130, 410 P.2d 171 (1966).
Despite inconvenience. Where the evidence showed nine outlets for the sale of beer within a radius of six blocks of applicant's store, and the testimony for applicant was limited and related only to an inconvenience in the location of other beer outlets, it could not be said that the showing made by applicant of the need for another beer outlet in the neighborhood was so plain and certain that the action of the licensing authority in denying the application was arbitrary and without good cause. MacArthur v. Sierota, 122 Colo. 115, 221 P.2d 346 (1950).
Denial of a license because of speculative reasons such as possible vandalism, noise, or disturbances, where it is obvious that these factors alone and not the required factors were the basis for the denial, is without legal justification. Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
Denial of a license because of resulting traffic and parking problems is without legal justification. Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
Issuance of other license not an admission of need. Where an application for a beer license was refused, the subsequent issuance of a license for the sale of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors to another applicant on premises only three blocks away was not an admission that there was a reasonable need and requirement for another licensed place in the neighborhood nor did it prove that the denial of the license to the applicant was plainly arbitrary. MacArthur v. Sierota, 122 Colo. 115, 221 P.2d 346 (1950).
A reference in the findings to previous proceedings was improper. Vigil v. Burress, 157 Colo. 507, 404 P.2d 147 (1965).
County may lawfully issue 3.2 percent license to nonprofit corporation which is licensee-concessionaire of a portion of golf clubhouse facilities, in order to provide such service to the patrons of the golf course and to the general public. Adams County Golf, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 199 Colo. 423, 610 P.2d 97 (1980).
Applied in Duran v. Riggs, 147 Colo. 278, 363 P.2d 656 (1961).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-108.
Law reviews. For article, "Moral C haracter of the Liquor Licensee or Applicant", see 25 C olo. Law. 79 (Feb. 1996).
The applicable legal requirements to be considered in issuing licenses are set forth in this section which deals with qualifications and conditions for license. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Skaff, 139 Colo. 452, 340 P.2d 866 (1959).
In the exercise of the police power the licensing authority may refuse to issue or renew a license for any good cause, and the courts may reverse the decision only if the refusal was arbitrary or without good cause under the circumstances of the case. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
Discretion of licensing authority. In acting on liquor applications, there is considerable latitude and discretion in the local licensing authority. However, its power to act is not a completely unbridled one and its action is subject to judicial review. Nat'l Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Englewood, 192 Colo. 109, 556 P.2d 476 (1976).
This section does not relieve applicants of the duty to prove a reasonable requirement for the proposed outlet, an essential prerequisite to the granting of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
The applicant has the burden of showing prima facie that the desires and reasonable requirements of the neighborhood dictate the issuance of the license. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Nat'l Tea Co., 149 Colo. 80, 367 P.2d 909 (1962).
Language concerning good moral character in section 12-48.5-108, which is similar to language in this section, is applied in R & F Enters., Inc. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 199 Colo. 137, 606 P.2d 64 (1980).
The liquor licensing authority has a duty to consider the character and reputation of the applicant. MacLarty v. Whiteford, 30 Colo. App. 378, 496 P.2d 1071 (1972).
Consideration of conduct and location proper. It is entirely proper for a licensing authority to take into account not only the conduct of the licensee but also conditions which render a continuance of a 3.2 beer license in a particular location against the public interest. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
The licensing authority is not limited in its consideration to the applicant's character, the need of the neighborhood, and the desires of the inhabitants. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
No arbitrariness in board's definition of neighborhood. Where the board in defining the neighborhood involved included therein not only the two subdivisions mentioned but also a few blocks south and west of said Duran's subdivision, wherein were located three existing 3.2 outlets, and also included in the neighborhood the fringe area adjacent, the board did not act arbitrarily in defining neighborhood to be affected. Duran v. Riggs, 147 Colo. 278, 363 P.2d 656 (1961).
The term "neighborhood" signifies nearness as opposed to remoteness. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
But not entire county. Moreover, no authority justifies the conclusion that the "neighborhood" involved in an application for a liquor license can be expanded to include an entire county. Kerr v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 170 Colo. 227, 460 P.2d 235 (1969).
Requirements of neighborhood and desires of inhabitants considered. This section requires the local licensing authority to consider not only the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood, but also the desires of its inhabitants. Neither is in itself controlling, but both must be considered together. Duran v. Riggs, 147 Colo. 278, 363 P.2d 656 (1961); Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 151 Colo. 115, 376 P.2d 519 (1962); Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
In regard to an application for a 3.2 percent beer license, local authorities are to consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants. U-Tote-M of Colo., Inc. v. City of Greenwood Vill., 39 Colo. App. 28, 563 P.2d 373 (1977).
Record must show prima facie desires, etc., of neighborhood. The granting or denial of a beverage license depends on the record made by an applicant before the local licensing authority and must show prima facie the desires and reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Nat'l Tea Co., 149 Colo. 80, 367 P.2d 909 (1962).
Under the statutory standard the applicant has the burden of making a prima facie showing that the desires of the inhabitants and reasonable requirements of the neighborhood establish the need for the issuance of the license. Nat'l Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Englewood, 192 Colo. 109, 556 P.2d 476 (1976).
Where the record before county commissioners discloses that the residents of a neighborhood indicated a desire that a license to dispense 3.2 beer be issued to an applicant and that there is no similar outlet in the entire community, a determination by a trial court that a denial of the application by the board was arbitrary and without good cause is proper. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Skaff, 139 Colo. 452, 340 P.2d 866 (1959).
Where evidence discloses that the overwhelming majority of persons living in a town are opposed to the granting of a liquor license, denial of the application therefor by board of county commissioners is neither arbitrary nor an abuse of discretion. Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 151 Colo. 115, 376 P.2d 519 (1962).
Prospective patrons considered. In determining whether a license to dispense 3.2 beer should be granted or denied to a dog racing kennel club, the patrons of the track were to be considered in determining the needs of the particular location. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
Inhabitants' petitions considered. This section precludes the licensing agency from granting a license until it has given good faith consideration to inhabitants' petitions and remonstrances. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
The number of persons signing for or against a license is not wholly determinative of either the reasonable requirements or the desires of the neighborhood. Vigil v. Burress, 157 Colo. 507, 404 P.2d 147 (1965).
It is not dispositive that plaintiff obtained more signatures in favor of the license than were presented by defendant in opposition. U-Tote-M of Colo., Inc. v. City of Greenwood Vill., 39 Colo. App. 28, 563 P.2d 373 (1977).
Other proof. This section in no way limits the board in giving proper consideration to other proof of the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the inhabitants thereof. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Letters from various organizations and individuals from a city at large have no probative value whatever. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
The desires of the citizens of one county cannot be controlling on the board of county commissioners of another county. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957).
Evidence before a licensing authority relating to teenage problems, noise, and rowdiness, indicating that such conditions were in substantial measure due to existence of 3.2 beer license of the applicant, authorized the licensing authority to determine that the license in the particular location was against the public interest. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
Denial of a license because of resulting traffic and parking problems is without legal justification. Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
Denial of a license because of speculative reasons such as possible vandalism, noise, or disturbances, where it is obvious that these factors alone and not the required factors were the basis for the denial, is without legal justification. Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
The mere existence of other outlets in the neighborhood, although a factor to be considered by the licensing authority, is not in itself a sufficient ground for denying a license. Nat'l Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Englewood, 192 Colo. 109, 556 P.2d 476 (1976).
The number and location of outlets licensed under the state "liquor code" are not a controlling factor in determining whether a license to dispense at retail fermented malt beverage by the package should be granted. Hirsch v. Bd. of Trustees, 150 Colo. 50, 370 P.2d 760 (1962).
The lack of proof that the neighborhood is not adequately served precludes issuance of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
The proximity of the proposed outlet to the existing outlet is an important factor properly to be considered by the licensing authority. Big Top, Inc. v. Hoskinson, 158 Colo. 400, 407 P.2d 26 (1965).
Must distinguish "package" and "by the drink" outlets. Where it appeared from the licensing agency findings that in consideration of the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood it refused to take cognizance of the distinction between outlets dispensing 3.2 beer by the package and a proposed outlet which would offer 3.2 beer by the drink, it acted arbitrarily. Kerr v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 170 Colo. 227, 460 P.2d 235 (1969).
Outlets found inadequate. A complete absence of a 3.2 outlet within a radius of five miles cannot be said to serve the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. Cloverleaf Kennel Club v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 441, 319 P.2d 487 (1957); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Skaff, 139 Colo. 452, 340 P.2d 866 (1959).
Where the record disclosed that only one outlet as that for which license was sought had been authorized in entire county, located at a distance of 25 miles from city where applicant resided, a license to sell 3.2 beer was unlawfully denied by the city council. McNeill v. City Council, 148 Colo. 277, 365 P.2d 687 (1961).
Where the record disclosed not a single outlet in a town for the dispensing of 3.2 beer, a finding by the town board of trustees that the area was served adequately with such beverage was wholly unsupported. Hirsch v. Bd. of Trustees, 150 Colo. 50, 370 P.2d 760 (1962).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-47-106.
Analysis
I. GENERAL CONSIDERATION.
Law reviews. For comment on Campbell v. City Council, appearing below, see 35 U. Colo. L. Rev. 252 (1963). For note, "The Liquor Code -- Colorado Revised Statute Antiquated", see 38 U. Colo. L. Rev. 248 (1965).
Delegation of legislative authority to the Department of Excise and Licenses to adopt rules and conduct hearings on applications to renew liquor licenses is not unconstitutional on the basis that the statute fails to provide sufficient standards for defining "good cause". Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Statutory licensing guide. The licensing authority is by statute charged with the duty and task of determining whether a license should be granted or denied, and the statutory guide provided for the board in performing this duty is found in this section. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Supreme court decisions. Another source of guidance for the board in performing its duties as a licensing authority is the numerous pronouncements of the supreme court. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Three principles pervade all of the pertinent decisions: (1) The licensing authorities are vested with a very wide discretion; (2) all reasonable doubts as to the correctness of the board's rulings are to be resolved in favor of the board; (3) the determination of the board will not be disturbed by the courts unless it appears that the board has abused its discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The issuance of licenses under the liquor code depends in the final analysis on the judgment of the licensing authority and not upon that of citizens or the court; and all reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
It was the intention of the general assembly to vest a wide discretion in local licensing authorities in the issuance of licenses for sale of alcoholic beverages. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
Governed by facts and circumstances. While a wide discretion is vested in the county commissioners with respect to the issuance of liquor licenses, the exercise of that discretion must be governed by a proper consideration of the facts and circumstances in each case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The exercise of this discretion cannot be dispensed with by the adoption of a policy to deny all applications. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The discretion of the licensing officer in granting or refusing a license is well established by the decisions of the supreme court. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
The general assembly has established the public policy for the entire state, and this cannot be overridden by local governments by mere fiat nor ignored by the courts. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
No contrary local policy authorized. The wide discretion which is vested in the licensing authority in granting or denying licenses is not to be construed as authority to establish a local public policy either by express resolution or by secret agreement contrary to the state statutes which have legalized the issuance of this particular type of license. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
Licensing procedures must not be used as a means of establishing local option and circumventing statutory requirements. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Local authority to license, not to regulate. The board of county commissioners has no authority to regulate the sale of malt and vinous liquors, other than 3.2 percent beer, but only to grant, suspend, or revoke licenses as provided by this section. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
A resolution of a city council limiting the number of liquor licenses on the basis of citywide population is invalid as tantamount to a prejudgment of any application, this article requiring a hearing, and issuance or denial of a license on the merits of each application. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
No authority to regulate hours. No attempt to delegate to the board of county commissioners any authority of regulation as to hours when malt or vinous liquors may be sold or the authority to promulgate other rules and regulations is made by this section. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
Personal right vested in licensee. A liquor license vests a personal right in the licensee and confers the right to do that which without the license would be unlawful, such right being coextensive with the duration of the license and is restricted to a certain location, unless change thereof is granted upon application to, and after a hearing by, the licensing authority. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Liquor license is a property right entitled to due process protection including notice and an opportunity to be heard and, therefore, due process was denied when claimant for liquor license renewal was not notified that evidence would be taken on the needs and desires of the neighborhood. Price Haskel v. Denver Dept. of Excise & Licenses, 694 P.2d 364 (Colo. App. 1984).
This section permits removal to another location of a hotel and restaurant license upon a proper showing. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
While the section permits removal to another location of a hotel or restaurant license upon a proper showing, a contract by which the parties agree that the licensee will not exercise this privilege, but upon termination of the tenancy will surrender the license to the licensing authority, is not in violation of the law since it is not an agreement for the transfer of the license. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Full, fair, and impartial hearing. Where an applicant was given full opportunity to present all testimony and documentary evidence it desired, and availed itself of such opportunity, the fact that the chairman of the board of county commissioners at beginning of hearing expressed the opinion that needs of the neighborhood were presently met, falls short of denial to applicant of full, fair, and impartial hearing. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
No court may substitute its judgment for that of the local licensing authority when there is any evidence in the record that supports the conclusion of the licensing authority. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977); Duren, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 709 P.2d 74 (Colo. App. 1985).
Denial upheld where not arbitrary or capricious. While not supported by a preponderance, the denial of a retail license will be upheld if supported by sufficient evidence, if the licensing authority did not act arbitrarily and capriciously. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Thompson, 167 Colo. 402, 448 P.2d 639 (1968).
"Good cause" standard fails to give sufficient notice. Standard in liquor code of "good cause" as the criterion for determining if a liquor license is renewed, without any implementing rules, fails to give sufficient definiteness of what conduct and conditions are required to avoid nonrenewal, fails to insure rational and consistent administrative action and effective subsequent judicial review of that action, and therefore violates due process. Some limit must be provided by the Department of Excise and Licenses to guide discretion in determining if "good cause" for refusing to renew a liquor license exists. Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Abuse of discretion. An example of refusal for good cause is where the board of county commissioners refused to grant a liquor license to an operator of a rural hotel and based its decision on the fact that the premises could be reached only by a dangerous, winding country road in a mountainous area and also on the ground of the proximity of young people at a nearby college, it was held not to be an abuse of discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The right of a licensing authority to refuse for good cause, of necessity vests in the board of county commissioners in any county in the first instance the right to determine what is good cause for refusal. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
Prior license action not binding. The board is not bound by any prior action of any licensing authority with relation to the facts pertaining to the issuance of any license for former years, but is called upon to exercise its own discretion as of the date of a new application. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Conceivably, the licensing authority passing upon a new application, in the exercise of its discretion, might with propriety reject an application which a former board, upon the same facts, approved, and in so doing the board would not, of necessity, be guilty of an abuse of discretion, or an arbitrary and capricious exercise thereof. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958); Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
That a licensing officer had previously denied the application to another to operate an establishment at the same premises does not preclude the issuance of a license to an applicant who in his judgment and discretion is qualified therefor. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
Evidence at second court-ordered hearing. Upon a second hearing on an application for a liquor license, held pursuant to an order of court, the licensing authority is not limited only to the exhibits offered at the first hearing and the testimony of those witnesses only who testified therein. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Applied in Awr Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 154 Colo. 511, 391 P.2d 675 (1964); Smith v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 155 Colo. 175, 394 P.2d 840 (1964).
II. NEIGHBORHOOD REQUIREMENTS.
Applications are considered and determined upon a geographical basis, a neighborhood, and not upon a citywide population basis. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
Determined by city council. The members of a city council, as the local licensing authority, knowing the area which they represent and the problems confronting it, are better able to consider what should constitute the "neighborhood" after considering all of the evidence presented to it than is the supreme court. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
The geographic extent of the neighborhood will vary from case to case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Never entire county. No authority justifies the conclusion that the "neighborhood" involved in an application for a liquor license can be expanded to include an entire county. Bolton v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 164 Colo. 112, 432 P.2d 761 (1967).
Boundary lines of a city do not exclude residents on one side or the other from the "neighborhood" to be considered in connection with applications for liquor licenses. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The existence or nonexistence of outlets on either side of a city boundary are to be considered by the licensing authority in determining whether reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The licensing of so-called "fringe stores" is not a matter that in and of itself is a bar to the issuance of licenses, but is merely a circumstance to which the board is entitled to give such reasonable weight as it shall determine. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Applicant's showing of neighborhood. It is incumbent upon an applicant for a liquor license to show with some degree of clarity the area of the neighborhood requiring the service proposed to be rendered. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The test under subsection (2) is still the "desires of the inhabitants" and "the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood". Tavella v. Eppinger, 152 Colo. 506, 383 P.2d 314 (1963).
Before a liquor license can be issued under subsection (2), two requirements must be affirmatively established: 1. that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met by existing outlets, and 2. that the inhabitants of the neighborhood desire its issuance. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
The licensing authority must determine both the reasonable requirements of a neighborhood and the desires of its inhabitants. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Unless both requirements are met no license may issue. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
Establishing these two requirements is the statutory responsibility of the board. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Showing of inadequate service required. An applicant is entitled to a license only on proof that the neighborhood sought to be served is not adequately served by the other licensed outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
This section does not relieve applicants of the duty to prove a reasonable requirement for the proposed outlet, an essential prerequisite to the granting of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area, an applicant for an additional liquor license has the burden to establish by competent evidence that the needs of the community are not being adequately met by existing outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Lack of proof of the fact that the neighborhood is not adequately served precludes the issuance of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Economic competition considered. Whether any benefit will result to the public from competition in the sale of intoxicating liquor in a particular area is a matter which the licensing authority may consider in determining the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, the weight to be accorded such matter being within the sound discretion of the authority. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
The weight to be accorded to such matters as whether any benefit will result to the public from economic competition lies within the sound discretion of the board of county supervisors. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
Number and proximity of other outlets considered. Besides considering the number of outlets in the area, the board of county commissioners may properly take into account in its consideration of the case the fact that close to the location for which a license is sought there are existing outlets to serve the public. Jennings v. Hoskinson, 152 Colo. 276, 382 P.2d 807 (1963).
The existence of a desire for a new outlet is some evidence that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were not being met. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
Regardless of their reasons, the desires of the inhabitants are to be considered. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Where protests were based on the general policy that liquor is evil, and secondly that there was a package store nearby, such protests were not relevant and should not have been considered since the application was for liquor by the drink. Since there was no competent evidence before the board to negate the affirmative showing by the applicant, and the board arbitrarily restricted the neighborhood, the license should have been granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Consideration of proof unlimited. This section in no way limits the board in giving proper consideration to other proof of the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the inhabitants thereof. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Effect of petitions and remonstrances of inhabitants. While the expression of opinions as to the requirements of the neighborhood and the needs of the inhabitants thereof, contained in petitions and remonstrances, are entitled to consideration, they are not controlling since this section requires that the issuance of licenses shall depend on the judgment of the licensing authority and not on that of citizens or the court. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950).
The statute precludes the board from granting a license until it has given good faith consideration to inhabitants' petitions and remonstrances. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Geographical distinctions within a neighborhood do not determine the efficacy of petitions or remonstrances in liquor licensing cases. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a greater number of inhabitants had signed petitions favoring issuance of the license does not of itself mandate issuance thereof. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
Where remonstrances against the granting of a beverage license are signed by others than those resident in a defined neighborhood of a licensee's outlet, and its issuance is supported by several hundred persons resident in the immediate neighborhood, the petitions supporting the application are sufficient to justify its issuance, and there being nothing to indicate that a city council acted arbitrarily or capriciously in granting a license, the courts will not interfere. Hanna v. Henderson, 140 Colo. 481, 345 P.2d 384 (1959).
Votes in local option election. The desires of the citizens "otherwise" expressed by their votes in a local option election is likewise admissible evidence to be considered in ascertaining the "desires of the inhabitants", and given such weight as the board of commissioners deemed proper under this section. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Needs of traveling public. In determining the reasonable requirements of neighborhood upon application for a restaurant liquor license, evidence of the reasonable need of the traveling public and transients is valid to show such need and demand. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
Showing of inadequate service sufficient. Where the record discloses that there are no restaurant liquor licenses in the city, and no such license in the entire county, the nearest outlet of the kind being 50 miles distant, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the area have been met. Farmer v. City Council, 153 Colo. 306, 385 P.2d 596 (1963).
Where there is a substantial showing that a liquor outlet is desired in a community, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being served when it appears that the nearest outlet of the kind sought is 12 or 13 miles distant from the location requested. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Whale, 154 Colo. 271, 389 P.2d 588 (1964).
Where the only licenses presently existing in a city are for private clubs and package liquor stores, and more favor than disfavor the license in the immediate neighborhood, there is no basis upon which the application of plaintiff may legally be denied since there are no licenses of the type sought within a five mile radius. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Where the general assembly has authorized the issuance of hotel and restaurant liquor licenses throughout the state, thus determining the public policy, and where the evidence disclosed that no such license had ever been issued in city of size and population disclosed by the record, and substantial support for the issuance of such license is shown, it cannot be said that reasonable requirements of the area have been met. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Denial arbitrary and capricious. Where there is no liquor outlet of a given classification within a radius of several miles, the refusal to grant such a license is arbitrary and capricious where substantial support for the issuance thereof is shown. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Where an application for a hotel and restaurant liquor license was denied and evidence disclosed that there was no such outlet within a radius of 35 miles of city, the determination of city council that the neighborhood was adequately supplied by existing outlets was arbitrary and capricious. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Showing of inadequate service insufficient. Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area in which a restaurant license is sought, evidence that many residents of the neighborhood desired to dine at applicants' restaurant and desired to be served liquor with their meals, does not alone establish that existing outlets were inadequate to satisfy the desires of the inhabitants and the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
The finding of the trial court that the applicant plans to provide a general recreation facility and that such facility is unlike any presently existing in the area, and this is fully borne out by the evidence and is undisputed, does not evidence the fact that the neighborhood in question requires another liquor outlet, especially where the undisputed evidence is that the proposed development will proceed whether or not a liquor license is granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Though the applicant proved the majority of those interested desired the license to issue, and it undoubtedly would be a convenience to have such a store within the shopping center where there is more adequate parking and one stop service, nevertheless it is also true that the physical facts could, and in the judgment of the authority did, show that the present reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Brentwood Liquors, Inc. v. Schooley, 147 Colo. 324, 363 P.2d 670 (1961).
Denial not capricious or arbitrary. Where even though the desire of the neighborhood was that the license should issue, nonetheless the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were adequately met by the existing outlets, in particular a liquor store next door to the applicant, the city council in so finding did not act arbitrarily or capriciously, but well within the limits of its discretionary power. McIntosh v. Council of City of Littleton, 145 Colo. 533, 360 P.2d 136 (1961).
Where the evidence in the record showed the existence of many licensed restaurants and liquor stores in the vicinity, this was potent evidence to support the finding that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood had been met and that the denial of a license was not capricious or arbitrary. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950).
Where evidence disclosed three existing hotel and restaurant liquor licenses in an area designated as a neighborhood and others in close proximity thereto, a finding by the licensing authority of lack of need for issuance of license applied for, based upon a fair appraisal of the evidence, cannot be held to be arbitrary. Schooley v. Steinberg, 148 Colo. 222, 365 P.2d 245 (1961).
Where the record disclosed two package liquor outlets and two establishments serving liquor by the drink within half to three quarters of a mile of applicant's location, denial of a package liquor license by board of county commissioners was not arbitrary or capricious. Malouff v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 150 Colo. 11, 370 P.2d 161 (1962).
Where the board of commissioners did not refuse to receive any evidence offered, and the evidence showed the location of the proposed dispensary to be in close proximity to state college, and where the board had before it protests admitted to have been made by many of the officials of the college and of the public schools, as well as petitions signed by citizens, the court could not say that the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously in refusing a license when such action was based on evidence from which reasonable men might honestly draw different conclusions. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Prima facie need for license shown. Where prior to condemnation by the state for highway purposes, there were two successful outlets in Silver Plume; that because of the condemnation proceedings there were none at the time of the application; that the nearest such outlet was two and one-half miles away; that 34 residents indicated the need for such an outlet; and where after denial of the application, but prior to the district court's review thereof, the trustees issued a similar license to a nearby establishment, the evidence constitutes a prima facie showing of need for the license. Booth v. Trustees of Town of Silver Plume, 28 Colo. App. 470, 474 P.2d 227 (1970).
44-3-302. License renewal - rules.
-
- Ninety days before the expiration date of an existing license, the state licensing authority shall notify the licensee of the expiration date by any method reasonably likely to actually notify the licensee. The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules setting the procedure to notify a licensee in accordance with this subsection (1)(a).
- For the renewal of an existing license, the licensee must apply to the local licensing authority not less than forty-five days and to the state licensing authority not less than thirty days before the date of expiration. The local licensing authority shall not accept an application for renewal of a license after the date of expiration, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section. Filing with the local licensing authority is deemed filing with the state licensing authority. The state licensing authority shall process all renewal applications that are filed with the local licensing authorities before the expiration date and subsequently approved and shall extend the expiration date until the state license application process is completed. The state or the local licensing authority, for good cause, may waive the forty-five- or thirty-day time requirements set forth in this subsection (1)(b).
- The local licensing authority may hold a hearing on the application for renewal, but not until a notice of hearing has been conspicuously posted on the licensed premises for ten days and notice of the hearing has been provided the applicant at least ten days before the hearing. The licensing authority may refuse to renew any license for good cause, subject to judicial review. The state licensing authority shall hold any renewal hearing in accordance with section 44-3-305 (2).
-
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, a licensee whose license has been expired for not more than ninety days may file a late renewal application upon the payment of a nonrefundable late application fee of five hundred dollars each to the state and local licensing authorities. A licensee who files a late renewal application and pays the requisite fees may continue to operate until both state and local licensing authorities have taken final action to approve or deny the licensee's late renewal application.
- A state or local licensing authority shall not accept a late renewal application more than ninety days after the expiration of a licensee's permanent annual license. Any licensee whose permanent annual license has been expired for more than ninety days must apply for a new license pursuant to section 44-3-311 or a reissued license pursuant to subsection (2)(d) of this section.
- Notwithstanding the amount specified for the fee in subsection (2)(a) of this section, the state licensing authority by rule or as otherwise provided by law may reduce the amount of the fee if necessary pursuant to section 24-75-402 (3) to reduce the uncommitted reserves of the fund to which all or any portion of the fee is credited. After the uncommitted reserves of the fund are sufficiently reduced, the state licensing authority by rule or as otherwise provided by law may increase the amount of the fee as provided in section 24-75-402 (4).
-
- Notwithstanding subsection (2)(b) of this section, with the permission of the licensing authority, a licensee whose permanent annual license has been expired for more than ninety days but less than one hundred eighty days may submit to the local licensing authority, or to the state licensing authority in the case of a licensee whose alcohol beverage license is not subject to issuance or approval by a local licensing authority, an application for a reissued license. The licensing authority has the sole discretion to determine whether to allow a licensee to apply for a reissued license.
- If the licensing authority does not allow the licensee's application, then the licensee must apply for a new license pursuant to section 44-3-311. A person who has applied for a new license shall not sell, or possess for sale in public view, any alcohol beverage until all required licenses have been obtained.
-
For licensees subject to issuance or approval by a local licensing authority, if the local licensing authority allows the licensee to apply for a reissuance of the expired license, the licensee must submit to the local licensing authority:
- An application for a reissued license;
- Payment of a five-hundred-dollar late application fee; and
- Payment of a fine of twenty-five dollars per day for each day the license has been expired beyond ninety days.
- After the local licensing authority accepts the application, late application fee, and fine, the licensee may continue to operate and sell alcohol beverages until the state licensing authority and local licensing authority have each taken final action on the licensee's application for license reissuance.
- If the local licensing authority approves the reissuance of the licensee's license, the local licensing authority shall forward the approved application to the state licensing authority for review. In addition to the late application fee and fine imposed by the local licensing authority, the state licensing authority shall impose a five-hundred-dollar late application fee and a fine of twenty-five dollars per day for each day the license has been expired beyond ninety days.
-
For licensees who are not subject to issuance or approval by a local licensing authority, if the state licensing authority allows the licensee to apply for a reissuance of the expired license, the licensee must submit to the state licensing authority:
- An application for a reissued license;
- Payment of a five-hundred-dollar late application fee; and
- Payment of a fine of twenty-five dollars per day for each day the license has been expired beyond ninety days.
- After the state licensing authority accepts the application, late application fee, and fine, the licensee may continue to operate and sell alcohol beverages until the state licensing authority takes final action on the licensee's application for license reissuance.
- If the state licensing authority approves the reissuance, the licensee will maintain the same license period dates as if the license had been renewed prior to the expiration date.
- If either the local or state licensing authority denies the licensee's application for reissuance of the expired license, then the licensee may apply for a new license pursuant to section 44-3-311.
- Neither the state nor local licensing authority may grant a licensee's application for license reissuance more than three times in any five-year period.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 972, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: (1) amended, (SB 20-086), ch. 67, p. 269, § 1, effective September 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-302 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Analysis
I. GENERAL CONSIDERATION.
Law reviews. For comment on Campbell v. City Council, appearing below, see 35 U. Colo. L. Rev. 252 (1963). For note, "The Liquor Code -- Colorado Revised Statute Antiquated", see 38 U. Colo. L. Rev. 248 (1965).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Statute is not unconstitutionally vague. A licensee has no property right in the renewal of a license and need not be provided procedural due process protections attendant to a property right. Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
Delegation of legislative authority to the Department of Excise and Licenses to adopt rules and conduct hearings on applications to renew liquor licenses is not unconstitutional on the basis that the statute fails to provide sufficient standards for defining "good cause". Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Statutory licensing guide. The licensing authority is by statute charged with the duty and task of determining whether a license should be granted or denied, and the statutory guide provided for the board in performing this duty is found in this section. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Supreme court decisions. Another source of guidance for the board in performing its duties as a licensing authority is the numerous pronouncements of the supreme court. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Three principles pervade all of the pertinent decisions: (1) The licensing authorities are vested with a very wide discretion; (2) all reasonable doubts as to the correctness of the board's rulings are to be resolved in favor of the board; (3) the determination of the board will not be disturbed by the courts unless it appears that the board has abused its discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The issuance of licenses under the liquor code depends in the final analysis on the judgment of the licensing authority and not upon that of citizens or the court; and all reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
It was the intention of the general assembly to vest a wide discretion in local licensing authorities in the issuance of licenses for sale of alcoholic beverages. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
Governed by facts and circumstances. While a wide discretion is vested in the county commissioners with respect to the issuance of liquor licenses, the exercise of that discretion must be governed by a proper consideration of the facts and circumstances in each case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The exercise of this discretion cannot be dispensed with by the adoption of a policy to deny all applications. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The discretion of the licensing officer in granting or refusing a license is well established by the decisions of the supreme court. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
The general assembly has established the public policy for the entire state, and this cannot be overridden by local governments by mere fiat nor ignored by the courts. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
No contrary local policy authorized. The wide discretion which is vested in the licensing authority in granting or denying licenses is not to be construed as authority to establish a local public policy either by express resolution or by secret agreement contrary to the state statutes which have legalized the issuance of this particular type of license. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
Licensing procedures must not be used as a means of establishing local option and circumventing statutory requirements. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Local authority to license, not to regulate. The board of county commissioners has no authority to regulate the sale of malt and vinous liquors, other than 3.2 percent beer, but only to grant, suspend, or revoke licenses as provided by this section. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
A resolution of a city council limiting the number of liquor licenses on the basis of citywide population is invalid as tantamount to a prejudgment of any application. This article requires a hearing and issuance or denial of a license on the merits of each application. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
No authority to regulate hours. This section makes no attempt to delegate to the board of county commissioners any authority of regulation as to hours when malt or vinous liquors may be sold or the authority to promulgate other rules and regulations. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
Personal right vested in licensee. A liquor license vests a personal right in the licensee and confers the right to do that which without the license would be unlawful, such right being coextensive with the duration of the license and is restricted to a certain location, unless change thereof is granted upon application to, and after a hearing by, the licensing authority. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Liquor license is a property right entitled to due process protection including notice and an opportunity to be heard and, therefore, due process was denied when claimant for liquor license renewal was not notified that evidence would be taken on the needs and desires of the neighborhood. Price Haskel v. Denver Dept. of Excise & Licenses, 694 P.2d 364 (Colo. App. 1984).
This section permits removal to another location of a hotel and restaurant license upon a proper showing. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
While the section permits removal to another location of a hotel or restaurant license upon a proper showing, a contract by which the parties agree that the licensee will not exercise this privilege, but upon termination of the tenancy will surrender the license to the licensing authority, is not in violation of the law since it is not an agreement for the transfer of the license. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Full, fair, and impartial hearing. Where an applicant was given full opportunity to present all testimony and documentary evidence it desired, and availed itself of such opportunity, the fact that the chairman of the board of county commissioners at beginning of hearing expressed the opinion that needs of the neighborhood were presently met falls short of denial to applicant of a full, fair, and impartial hearing. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
No court may substitute its judgment for that of the local licensing authority when there is any evidence in the record that supports the conclusion of the licensing authority. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977); Duren, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 709 P.2d 74 (Colo. App. 1985).
Denial upheld where not arbitrary or capricious. While not supported by a preponderance, the denial of a retail license will be upheld if supported by sufficient evidence, if the licensing authority did not act arbitrarily and capriciously. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Thompson, 167 Colo. 402, 448 P.2d 639 (1968).
The nonrenewal of a liquor license is not a sanction. Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
"Good cause" standard fails to give sufficient notice. Standard in liquor code of "good cause" as the criterion for determining if a liquor license is renewed, without any implementing rules, fails to give sufficient definiteness of what conduct and conditions are required to avoid nonrenewal, fails to insure rational and consistent administrative action and effective subsequent judicial review of that action, and therefore violates due process. Some limit must be provided by the Department of Excise and Licenses to guide discretion in determining if "good cause" for refusing to renew a liquor license exists. Squire Restaurant & Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994) (decided under former law).
Any violation of a provision of the Colorado Liquor Code constitutes good cause for nonrenewal. Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
Abuse of discretion. An example of refusal for good cause is where the board of county commissioners refused to grant a liquor license to an operator of a rural hotel and based its decision on the fact that the premises could be reached only by a dangerous, winding country road in a mountainous area and also on the ground of the proximity of young people at a nearby college, it was held not to be an abuse of discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The right of a licensing authority to refuse for good cause, of necessity vests in the board of county commissioners in any county in the first instance the right to determine what is good cause for refusal. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
Prior license action not binding. The board is not bound by any prior action of any licensing authority with relation to the facts pertaining to the issuance of any license for former years, but is called upon to exercise its own discretion as of the date of a new application. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Conceivably, the licensing authority passing upon a new application, in the exercise of its discretion, might with propriety reject an application which a former board, upon the same facts, approved, and in so doing the board would not, of necessity, be guilty of an abuse of discretion, or an arbitrary and capricious exercise thereof. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958); Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
That a licensing officer had previously denied the application to another to operate an establishment at the same premises does not preclude the issuance of a license to an applicant who in his judgment and discretion is qualified therefor. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
Evidence at second court-ordered hearing. Upon a second hearing on an application for a liquor license, held pursuant to an order of court, the licensing authority is not limited only to the exhibits offered at the first hearing and the testimony of those witnesses only who testified therein. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Sanctions criteria set forth in § 12-47-601 do not govern a decision not to renew under subsection (1) of this section. Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
Applied in Awr Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 154 Colo. 511, 391 P.2d 675 (1964); Smith v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 155 Colo. 175, 394 P.2d 840 (1964).
II. NEIGHBORHOOD REQUIREMENTS.
Applications are considered and determined upon a geographical basis, a neighborhood, and not upon a citywide population basis. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
Determined by city council. The members of a city council, as the local licensing authority, knowing the area which they represent and the problems confronting it, are better able to consider what should constitute the "neighborhood" after considering all of the evidence presented to it than is the supreme court. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
The geographic extent of the neighborhood will vary from case to case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Never entire county. No authority justifies the conclusion that the "neighborhood" involved in an application for a liquor license can be expanded to include an entire county. Bolton v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 164 Colo. 112, 432 P.2d 761 (1967).
Boundary lines of a city do not exclude residents on one side or the other from the "neighborhood" to be considered in connection with applications for liquor licenses. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The existence or nonexistence of outlets on either side of a city boundary are to be considered by the licensing authority in determining whether reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The licensing of so-called "fringe stores" is not a matter that in and of itself is a bar to the issuance of licenses, but is merely a circumstance to which the board is entitled to give such reasonable weight as it shall determine. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Applicant's showing of neighborhood. It is incumbent upon an applicant for a liquor license to show with some degree of clarity the area of the neighborhood requiring the service proposed to be rendered. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The test under subsection (2) is still the "desires of the inhabitants" and "the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood". Tavella v. Eppinger, 152 Colo. 506, 383 P.2d 314 (1963).
Before a liquor license can be issued under subsection (2), two requirements must be affirmatively established: 1. that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met by existing outlets, and 2. that the inhabitants of the neighborhood desire its issuance. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
The licensing authority must determine both the reasonable requirements of a neighborhood and the desires of its inhabitants. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Unless both requirements are met no license may issue. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
Establishing these two requirements is the statutory responsibility of the board. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Showing of inadequate service required. An applicant is entitled to a license only on proof that the neighborhood sought to be served is not adequately served by the other licensed outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
This section does not relieve applicants of the duty to prove a reasonable requirement for the proposed outlet, an essential prerequisite to the granting of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area, an applicant for an additional liquor license has the burden to establish by competent evidence that the needs of the community are not being adequately met by existing outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Lack of proof of the fact that the neighborhood is not adequately served precludes the issuance of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Economic competition considered. Whether any benefit will result to the public from competition in the sale of intoxicating liquor in a particular area, is a matter which the licensing authority may consider in determining the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, the weight to be accorded such matter being within the sound discretion of the authority. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
The weight to be accorded to such matters as whether any benefit will result to the public from economic competition lies within the sound discretion of the board of county supervisors. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
Number and proximity of other outlets considered. Besides considering the number of outlets in the area, the board of county commissioners may properly take into account in its consideration of the case the fact that close to the location for which a license is sought there are existing outlets to serve the public. Jennings v. Hoskinson, 152 Colo. 276, 382 P.2d 807 (1963).
The existence of a desire for a new outlet is some evidence that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were not being met. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
Regardless of their reasons, the desires of the inhabitants are to be considered. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Where protests were based on the general policy that liquor is evil, and secondly that there was a package store nearby, such protests were not relevant and should not have been considered since the application was for liquor by the drink, and since there was no competent evidence before the board to negate the affirmative showing by the applicant, and the board arbitrarily restricted the neighborhood, the license should have been granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Consideration of proof unlimited. This section in no way limits the board in giving proper consideration to other proof of the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the inhabitants thereof. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Effect of petitions and remonstrances of inhabitants. While the expression of opinions as to the requirements of the neighborhood and the needs of the inhabitants thereof, contained in petitions and remonstrances, are entitled to consideration, they are not controlling since this section requires that the issuance of licenses shall depend on the judgment of the licensing authority and not on that of citizens or the court. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950).
The statute precludes the board from granting a license until it has given good-faith consideration to inhabitants' petitions and remonstrances. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Geographical distinctions within a neighborhood do not determine the efficacy of petitions or remonstrances in liquor licensing cases. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a greater number of inhabitants had signed petitions favoring issuance of the license does not of itself mandate issuance thereof. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
Where remonstrances against the granting of a beverage license are signed by others than those resident in a defined neighborhood of a licensee's outlet, and its issuance is supported by several hundred persons resident in the immediate neighborhood, the petitions supporting the application are sufficient to justify its issuance, and there being nothing to indicate that a city council acted arbitrarily or capriciously in granting a license, the courts will not interfere. Hanna v. Henderson, 140 Colo. 481, 345 P.2d 384 (1959).
Votes in local option election. The desires of the citizens "otherwise" expressed by their votes in a local option election is likewise admissible evidence to be considered in ascertaining the "desires of the inhabitants", and given such weight as the board of commissioners deemed proper under this section. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Needs of traveling public. In determining the reasonable requirements of neighborhood upon application for a restaurant liquor license, evidence of the reasonable need of the traveling public and transients is valid to show such need and demand. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
Showing of inadequate service sufficient. Where the record discloses that there are no restaurant liquor licenses in the city, and no such license in the entire county, the nearest outlet of the kind being 50 miles distant, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the area have been met. Farmer v. City Council, 153 Colo. 306, 385 P.2d 596 (1963).
Where there is a substantial showing that a liquor outlet is desired in a community, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being served when it appears that the nearest outlet of the kind sought is 12 or 13 miles distant from the location requested. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Whale, 154 Colo. 271, 389 P.2d 588 (1964).
Where the only licenses presently existing in a city are for private clubs and package liquor stores, and more favor than disfavor the license in the immediate neighborhood, there is no basis upon which the application of plaintiff may legally be denied since there are no licenses of the type sought within a five mile radius. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Where the general assembly has authorized the issuance of hotel and restaurant liquor licenses throughout the state, thus determining the public policy, and where the evidence disclosed that no such license had ever been issued in city of size and population disclosed by the record, and substantial support for the issuance of such license is shown, it cannot be said that reasonable requirements of the area have been met. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Denial arbitrary and capricious. Where there is no liquor outlet of a given classification within a radius of several miles, the refusal to grant such a license is arbitrary and capricious where substantial support for the issuance thereof is shown. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Where an application for a hotel and restaurant liquor license was denied and evidence disclosed that there was no such outlet within a radius of 35 miles of city, the determination of city council that the neighborhood was adequately supplied by existing outlets was arbitrary and capricious. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Showing of inadequate service insufficient. Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area in which a restaurant license is sought, evidence that many residents of the neighborhood desired to dine at applicants' restaurant and desired to be served liquor with their meals, does not alone establish that existing outlets were inadequate to satisfy the desires of the inhabitants and the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
The finding of the trial court that the applicant plans to provide a general recreation facility and that such facility is unlike any presently existing in the area, and this is fully borne out by the evidence and is undisputed, does not evidence the fact that the neighborhood in question requires another liquor outlet, especially where the undisputed evidence is that the proposed development will proceed whether or not a liquor license is granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Though the applicant proved the majority of those interested desired the license to issue, and it undoubtedly would be a convenience to have such a store within the shopping center where there is more adequate parking and one stop service, nevertheless it is also true that the physical facts could, and in the judgment of the authority did, show that the present reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Brentwood Liquors, Inc. v. Schooley, 147 Colo. 324, 363 P.2d 670 (1961).
Denial not capricious or arbitrary. Where even though the desire of the neighborhood was that the license should issue, nonetheless the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were adequately met by the existing outlets, in particular a liquor store next door to the applicant, the city council in so finding did not act arbitrarily or capriciously, but well within the limits of its discretionary power. McIntosh v. Council of City of Littleton, 145 Colo. 533, 360 P.2d 136 (1961).
Where the evidence in the record showed the existence of many licensed restaurants and liquor stores in the vicinity, this was potent evidence to support the finding that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood had been met and that the denial of a license was not capricious or arbitrary. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950).
Where evidence disclosed three existing hotel and restaurant liquor licenses in an area designated as a neighborhood and others in close proximity thereto, a finding by the licensing authority of lack of need for issuance of license applied for, based upon a fair appraisal of the evidence, cannot be held to be arbitrary. Schooley v. Steinberg, 148 Colo. 222, 365 P.2d 245 (1961).
Where the record disclosed two package liquor outlets and two establishments serving liquor by the drink within half to three quarters of a mile of applicant's location, denial of a package liquor license by board of county commissioners was not arbitrary or capricious. Malouff v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 150 Colo. 11, 370 P.2d 161 (1962).
Where the board of commissioners did not refuse to receive any evidence offered, and the evidence showed the location of the proposed dispensary to be in close proximity to state college, and where the board had before it protests admitted to have been made by many of the officials of the college and of the public schools, as well as petitions signed by citizens, the court could not say that the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously in refusing a license when such action was based on evidence from which reasonable men might honestly draw different conclusions. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Prima facie need for license shown. Where prior to condemnation by the state for highway purposes, there were two successful outlets in Silver Plume; that because of the condemnation proceedings there were none at the time of the application; that the nearest such outlet was two and one-half miles away; that 34 residents indicated the need for such an outlet; and where after denial of the application, but prior to the district court's review thereof, the trustees issued a similar license to a nearby establishment, the evidence constitutes a prima facie showing of need for the license. Booth v. Trustees of Town of Silver Plume, 28 Colo. App. 470, 474 P.2d 227 (1970).
44-3-303. Transfer of ownership and temporary permits.
-
- No license granted under the provisions of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 shall be transferable except as provided in this subsection (1), but this shall not prevent a change of location as provided in section 44-3-301 (9).
- When a license has been issued to a husband and wife, or to general or limited partners, the death of a spouse or partner shall not require the surviving spouse or partner to obtain a new license. All rights and privileges granted under the original license shall continue in full force and effect as to such survivors for the balance of the license period.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (1)(c)(II) of this section, for any other transfer of ownership, application must be made to the state and local licensing authorities on forms prepared and furnished by the state licensing authority. In determining whether to permit a transfer of ownership, the licensing authorities shall consider only the requirements of section 44-3-307 and 1 CCR 203-2, rule 47-302, entitled "Changing, Altering, or Modifying Licensed Premises", or any analogous successor rule. The local licensing authority may conduct a hearing on the application for transfer of ownership after providing notice in accordance with subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section. Any transfer of ownership hearing by the state licensing authority must be held in accordance with section 44-3-305 (2).
- A license merger and conversion as provided for in section 44-3-410 (1)(b) includes a transfer of ownership of at least two retail liquor stores, a change of location of one of the retail liquor stores, and a merger and conversion of the retail liquor store licenses into a single liquor-licensed drugstore license, all as part of a single transaction, and the liquor-licensed drugstore applicant need not apply separately for a transfer of ownership under this section. The liquor-licensed drugstore applying for a license merger and conversion pursuant to section 44-3-410 (1)(b) is ineligible for a temporary permit pursuant to this section. The local licensing authority shall consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood pursuant to section 44-3-312 when making a determination on the merger and conversion of the retail liquor store licenses into a single liquor-licensed drugstore license. The local licensing authority may hold a hearing on the application for the license merger and conversion after providing notice in accordance with subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section.
- Prior to holding a hearing as provided in this subsection (1)(c), the local licensing authority shall notify the applicant of the hearing at least ten days before the hearing and shall post, or may direct the license applicant to post, a notice of the hearing in a conspicuous location on the licensed premises for at least ten consecutive days before the hearing.
- The state or a local licensing authority shall not approve a transfer of ownership under this subsection (1) until the applicant files with the local licensing authority confirmation from each wholesaler licensed under this article 3 that has sold alcohol beverages to the transferor that the wholesaler has been paid in full for all alcohol beverages delivered to the transferor.
- Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, a local licensing authority may issue a temporary permit to a transferee of any retail class of alcohol beverage license issued by the local licensing authority pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that a local licensing authority shall not issue a temporary permit to a liquor-licensed drugstore that has acquired ownership of licensed retail liquor stores in accordance with section 44-3-410 (1)(b). A temporary permit authorizes a transferee to continue selling alcohol beverages as permitted under the permanent license during the period in which an application to transfer the ownership of the license is pending.
-
A temporary permit shall authorize a transferee to conduct business and sell alcohol beverages at retail in accordance with the license of the transferor subject to compliance with all of the following conditions:
- The premises where alcohol beverages are sold shall have been previously licensed by the state and local licensing authorities, and the license shall have been valid at the time the application for transfer of ownership was filed with the local licensing authority that has jurisdiction to approve an application for a temporary permit.
-
The applicant has filed with the local licensing authority on forms provided by the department an application for the transfer of the liquor license. The application shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:
- The name and address of the applicant; if the applicant is a partnership, the names and addresses of all the partners; and, if the applicant is a corporation, association, or other organization, the names and addresses of the president, vice-president, secretary, and managing officer;
- The applicant's financial interest in the proposed transfer;
- The premises for which the temporary permit is sought;
- Such other information as the local licensing authority may require; and
- A statement that all accounts for alcohol beverages sold to the applicant are paid.
- The application for a temporary permit shall be filed no later than thirty days after the filing of the application for transfer of ownership and shall be accompanied by a temporary permit fee not to exceed one hundred dollars.
- When applying with the local licensing authority for a temporary permit, the applicant shall provide a copy, by facsimile or otherwise, of the statement made pursuant to subsection (3)(b)(V) of this section to the state licensing authority. The statement is a public record and shall be open to inspection by the public.
- A temporary permit, if granted, by a local licensing authority shall be issued within five working days after the receipt of the application. A temporary permit issued pursuant to this section shall be valid until such time as the application to transfer ownership of the license to the applicant is granted or denied or for one hundred twenty days, whichever occurs first; except that, if the application to transfer the license has not been granted or denied within the one-hundred-twenty-day period and the transferee demonstrates good cause, the local licensing authority may extend, in its discretion, the validity of the permit for an additional period not to exceed sixty days.
- A temporary permit shall also be authorized in the event of a transfer of possession of the licensed premises by operation of law, a petition in bankruptcy pursuant to federal bankruptcy law, the appointment of a receiver, a foreclosure action by a secured party, or a court order dispossessing the prior licensee of all rights of possession pursuant to article 40 of title 13.
- A temporary permit may be canceled, revoked, or summarily suspended if the local or state licensing authority determines that there is probable cause to believe that the transferee has violated any provision of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 or has violated any rule adopted by the local or state licensing authority or has failed to truthfully disclose those matters required pursuant to the application forms required by the department.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 974, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: IP(3)(b) and (6) amended, (SB 19-241), ch. 390, p. 3478, § 61, effective August 2.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-303 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Analysis
I. GENERAL CONSIDERATION.
Law reviews. For comment on Campbell v. City Council, appearing below, see 35 U. Colo. L. Rev. 252 (1963). For note, "The Liquor Code -- Colorado Revised Statute Antiquated", see 38 U. Colo. L. Rev. 248 (1965).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Delegation of legislative authority to the Department of Excise and Licenses to adopt rules and conduct hearings on applications to renew liquor licenses is not unconstitutional on the basis that the statute fails to provide sufficient standards for defining "good cause". Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Statutory licensing guide. The licensing authority is by statute charged with the duty and task of determining whether a license should be granted or denied, and the statutory guide provided for the board in performing this duty is found in this section. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Supreme court decisions. Another source of guidance for the board in performing its duties as a licensing authority is the numerous pronouncements of the supreme court. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Three principles pervade all of the pertinent decisions: (1) The licensing authorities are vested with a very wide discretion; (2) all reasonable doubts as to the correctness of the board's rulings are to be resolved in favor of the board; (3) the determination of the board will not be disturbed by the courts unless it appears that the board has abused its discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The issuance of licenses under the liquor code depends in the final analysis on the judgment of the licensing authority and not upon that of citizens or the court; and all reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
It was the intention of the general assembly to vest a wide discretion in local licensing authorities in the issuance of licenses for sale of alcoholic beverages. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
Governed by facts and circumstances. While a wide discretion is vested in the county commissioners with respect to the issuance of liquor licenses, the exercise of that discretion must be governed by a proper consideration of the facts and circumstances in each case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The exercise of this discretion cannot be dispensed with by the adoption of a policy to deny all applications. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The discretion of the licensing officer in granting or refusing a license is well established by the decisions of the supreme court. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
The general assembly has established the public policy for the entire state, and this cannot be overridden by local governments by mere fiat nor ignored by the courts. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
No contrary local policy authorized. The wide discretion which is vested in the licensing authority in granting or denying licenses is not to be construed as authority to establish a local public policy either by express resolution or by secret agreement contrary to the state statutes which have legalized the issuance of this particular type of license. Ladd v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 146 Colo. 366, 361 P.2d 627 (1961).
Licensing procedures must not be used as a means of establishing local option and circumventing statutory requirements. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Local authority to license, not to regulate. The board of county commissioners has no authority to regulate the sale of malt and vinous liquors, other than 3.2 percent beer, but only to grant, suspend, or revoke licenses as provided by this section. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
A resolution of a city council limiting the number of liquor licenses on the basis of citywide population is invalid as tantamount to a prejudgment of any application. This article requires a hearing and issuance or denial of a license on the merits of each application. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
No authority to regulate hours. This section makes no attempt to delegate to the board of county commissioners any authority of regulation as to hours when malt or vinous liquors may be sold or the authority to promulgate other rules and regulations. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
Personal right vested in licensee. A liquor license vests a personal right in the licensee and confers the right to do that which without the license would be unlawful, such right being coextensive with the duration of the license and is restricted to a certain location, unless change thereof is granted upon application to, and after a hearing by, the licensing authority. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Liquor license is a property right entitled to due process protection including notice and an opportunity to be heard and, therefore, due process was denied when claimant for liquor license renewal was not notified that evidence would be taken on the needs and desires of the neighborhood. Price Haskel v. Denver Dept. of Excise & Licenses, 694 P.2d 364 (Colo. App. 1984).
This section permits removal to another location of a hotel and restaurant license upon a proper showing. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
While the section permits removal to another location of a hotel or restaurant license upon a proper showing, a contract by which the parties agree that the licensee will not exercise this privilege, but upon termination of the tenancy will surrender the license to the licensing authority, is not in violation of the law since it is not an agreement for the transfer of the license. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Full, fair, and impartial hearing. Where an applicant was given full opportunity to present all testimony and documentary evidence it desired, and availed itself of such opportunity, the fact that the chairman of the board of county commissioners at beginning of hearing expressed the opinion that needs of the neighborhood were presently met falls short of denial to applicant of a full, fair, and impartial hearing. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
No court may substitute its judgment for that of the local licensing authority when there is any evidence in the record that supports the conclusion of the licensing authority. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977); Duren, Inc. v. City of Lakewood, 709 P.2d 74 (Colo. App. 1985).
Denial upheld where not arbitrary or capricious. While not supported by a preponderance, the denial of a retail license will be upheld if supported by sufficient evidence, if the licensing authority did not act arbitrarily and capriciously. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Thompson, 167 Colo. 402, 448 P.2d 639 (1968).
"Good cause" standard fails to give sufficient notice. Standard in liquor code of "good cause" as the criterion for determining if a liquor license is renewed, without any implementing rules, fails to give sufficient definiteness of what conduct and conditions are required to avoid nonrenewal, fails to insure rational and consistent administrative action and effective subsequent judicial review of that action, and therefore violates due process. Some limit must be provided by the Department of Excise and Licenses to guide discretion in determining if "good cause" for refusing to renew a liquor license exists. Squire Restaurant and Lounge v. Denver, 890 P.2d 164 (Colo. App. 1994).
Abuse of discretion. An example of refusal for good cause is where the board of county commissioners refused to grant a liquor license to an operator of a rural hotel and based its decision on the fact that the premises could be reached only by a dangerous, winding country road in a mountainous area and also on the ground of the proximity of young people at a nearby college, it was held not to be an abuse of discretion. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
The right of a licensing authority to refuse for good cause, of necessity vests in the board of county commissioners in any county in the first instance the right to determine what is good cause for refusal. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Buckley, 121 Colo. 108, 213 P.2d 608 (1949).
Prior license action not binding. The board is not bound by any prior action of any licensing authority with relation to the facts pertaining to the issuance of any license for former years, but is called upon to exercise its own discretion as of the date of a new application. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Conceivably, the licensing authority passing upon a new application, in the exercise of its discretion, might with propriety reject an application which a former board, upon the same facts, approved, and in so doing the board would not, of necessity, be guilty of an abuse of discretion, or an arbitrary and capricious exercise thereof. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958); Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
That a licensing officer had previously denied the application to another to operate an establishment at the same premises does not preclude the issuance of a license to an applicant who in his judgment and discretion is qualified therefor. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
Evidence at second court-ordered hearing. Upon a second hearing on an application for a liquor license, held pursuant to an order of court, the licensing authority is not limited only to the exhibits offered at the first hearing and the testimony of those witnesses only who testified therein. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
Applied in Awr Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 154 Colo. 511, 391 P.2d 675 (1964); Smith v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 155 Colo. 175, 394 P.2d 840 (1964).
II. NEIGHBORHOOD REQUIREMENTS.
Applications are considered and determined upon a geographical basis, a neighborhood, and not upon a citywide population basis. City of Colo. Springs v. Graham, 143 Colo. 97, 352 P.2d 273 (1960).
Determined by city council. The members of a city council, as the local licensing authority, knowing the area which they represent and the problems confronting it, are better able to consider what should constitute the "neighborhood" after considering all of the evidence presented to it than is the supreme court. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
The geographic extent of the neighborhood will vary from case to case. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Never entire county. No authority justifies the conclusion that the "neighborhood" involved in an application for a liquor license can be expanded to include an entire county. Bolton v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 164 Colo. 112, 432 P.2d 761 (1967).
Boundary lines of a city do not exclude residents on one side or the other from the "neighborhood" to be considered in connection with applications for liquor licenses. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The existence or nonexistence of outlets on either side of a city boundary are to be considered by the licensing authority in determining whether reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The licensing of so-called "fringe stores" is not a matter that in and of itself is a bar to the issuance of licenses, but is merely a circumstance to which the board is entitled to give such reasonable weight as it shall determine. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Applicant's showing of neighborhood. It is incumbent upon an applicant for a liquor license to show with some degree of clarity the area of the neighborhood requiring the service proposed to be rendered. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
The test under subsection (2) is still the "desires of the inhabitants" and "the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood". Tavella v. Eppinger, 152 Colo. 506, 383 P.2d 314 (1963).
Before a liquor license can be issued under subsection (2), two requirements must be affirmatively established: 1. that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met by existing outlets, and 2. that the inhabitants of the neighborhood desire its issuance. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
The licensing authority must determine both the reasonable requirements of a neighborhood and the desires of its inhabitants. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Unless both requirements are met, no license may issue. Heinz v. Bauer, 150 Colo. 589, 375 P.2d 520 (1962).
Establishing these two requirements is the statutory responsibility of the board. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Showing of inadequate service required. An applicant is entitled to a license only on proof that the neighborhood sought to be served is not adequately served by the other licensed outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 138 Colo. 66, 329 P.2d 629 (1958).
This section does not relieve applicants of the duty to prove a reasonable requirement for the proposed outlet, an essential prerequisite to the granting of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area, an applicant for an additional liquor license has the burden to establish by competent evidence that the needs of the community are not being adequately met by existing outlets. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Lack of proof of the fact that the neighborhood is not adequately served precludes the issuance of a license. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Economic competition considered. Whether any benefit will result to the public from competition in the sale of intoxicating liquor in a particular area is a matter which the licensing authority may consider in determining the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, the weight to be accorded such matter being within the sound discretion of the authority. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
The weight to be accorded to such matters as whether any benefit will result to the public from economic competition lies within the sound discretion of the board of county supervisors. Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
Number and proximity of other outlets considered. Besides considering the number of outlets in the area, the board of county commissioners may properly take into account in its consideration of the case the fact that close to the location for which a license is sought there are existing outlets to serve the public. Jennings v. Hoskinson, 152 Colo. 276, 382 P.2d 807 (1963).
The existence of a desire for a new outlet is some evidence that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were not being met. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
Regardless of their reasons, the desires of the inhabitants are to be considered. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Where protests were based on the general policy that liquor is evil, and secondly that there was a package store nearby, such protests were not relevant and should not have been considered since the application was for liquor by the drink, and since there was no competent evidence before the board to negate the affirmative showing by the applicant, and the board arbitrarily restricted the neighborhood, the license should have been granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Consideration of proof unlimited. This section in no way limits the board in giving proper consideration to other proof of the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the inhabitants thereof. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Effect of petitions and remonstrances of inhabitants. While the expression of opinions as to the requirements of the neighborhood and the needs of the inhabitants thereof, contained in petitions and remonstrances, are entitled to consideration, they are not controlling since this section requires that the issuance of licenses shall depend on the judgment of the licensing authority and not on that of citizens or the court. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950).
The statute precludes the board from granting a license until it has given good-faith consideration to inhabitants' petitions and remonstrances. Hauf Brau v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 145 Colo. 522, 359 P.2d 659 (1961).
Geographical distinctions within a neighborhood do not determine the efficacy of petitions or remonstrances in liquor licensing cases. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The fact that a greater number of inhabitants had signed petitions favoring issuance of the license does not of itself mandate issuance thereof. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
Where remonstrances against the granting of a beverage license are signed by others than those resident in a defined neighborhood of a licensee's outlet, and its issuance is supported by several hundred persons resident in the immediate neighborhood, the petitions supporting the application are sufficient to justify its issuance, and there being nothing to indicate that a city council acted arbitrarily or capriciously in granting a license, the courts will not interfere. Hanna v. Henderson, 140 Colo. 481, 345 P.2d 384 (1959).
Votes in local option election. The desires of the citizens "otherwise" expressed by their votes in a local option election is likewise admissible evidence to be considered in ascertaining the "desires of the inhabitants", and given such weight as the board of commissioners deemed proper under this section. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Needs of traveling public. In determining the reasonable requirements of neighborhood upon application for a restaurant liquor license, evidence of the reasonable need of the traveling public and transients is valid to show such need and demand. Campbell v. City Council, 150 Colo. 471, 374 P.2d 348 (1962).
Showing of inadequate service sufficient. Where the record discloses that there are no restaurant liquor licenses in the city, and no such license in the entire county, the nearest outlet of the kind being 50 miles distant, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the area have been met. Farmer v. City Council, 153 Colo. 306, 385 P.2d 596 (1963).
Where there is a substantial showing that a liquor outlet is desired in a community, it cannot be said that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being served when it appears that the nearest outlet of the kind sought is 12 or 13 miles distant from the location requested. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Whale, 154 Colo. 271, 389 P.2d 588 (1964).
Where the only licenses presently existing in a city are for private clubs and package liquor stores, and more favor than disfavor the license in the immediate neighborhood, there is no basis upon which the application of plaintiff may legally be denied since there are no licenses of the type sought within a five mile radius. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Where the general assembly has authorized the issuance of hotel and restaurant liquor licenses throughout the state, thus determining the public policy, and where the evidence disclosed that no such license had ever been issued in city of size and population disclosed by the record, and substantial support for the issuance of such license is shown, it cannot be said that reasonable requirements of the area have been met. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Denial arbitrary and capricious. Where there is no liquor outlet of a given classification within a radius of several miles, the refusal to grant such a license is arbitrary and capricious where substantial support for the issuance thereof is shown. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bickel, 155 Colo. 465, 395 P.2d 208 (1964); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Where an application for a hotel and restaurant liquor license was denied and evidence disclosed that there was no such outlet within a radius of 35 miles of city, the determination of city council that the neighborhood was adequately supplied by existing outlets was arbitrary and capricious. KBT Corp. v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685 (1961).
Showing of inadequate service insufficient. Where there are a number of licensed outlets in an area in which a restaurant license is sought, evidence that many residents of the neighborhood desired to dine at applicants' restaurant and desired to be served liquor with their meals did not alone establish that existing outlets were inadequate to satisfy the desires of the inhabitants and the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
The finding of the trial court that the applicant plans to provide a general recreation facility and that such facility is unlike any presently existing in the area, and this is fully borne out by the evidence and is undisputed, does not evidence the fact that the neighborhood in question requires another liquor outlet, especially where the undisputed evidence is that the proposed development will proceed whether or not a liquor license is granted. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Evergreen Lanes, Inc., 154 Colo. 413, 391 P.2d 372 (1964).
Though the applicant proved the majority of those interested desired the license to issue, and it undoubtedly would be a convenience to have such a store within the shopping center where there is more adequate parking and one stop service, nevertheless it is also true that the physical facts could, and in the judgment of the authority did, show that the present reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Brentwood Liquors, Inc. v. Schooley, 147 Colo. 324, 363 P.2d 670 (1961).
Denial not capricious or arbitrary. Where even though the desire of the neighborhood was that the license should issue, nonetheless the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were adequately met by the existing outlets, in particular a liquor store next door to the applicant, the city council in so finding did not act arbitrarily or capriciously, but well within the limits of its discretionary power. McIntosh v. Council of City of Littleton, 145 Colo. 533, 360 P.2d 136 (1961).
Where the evidence in the record showed the existence of many licensed restaurants and liquor stores in the vicinity, this was potent evidence to support the finding that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood had been met and that the denial of a license was not capricious or arbitrary. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950).
Where evidence disclosed three existing hotel and restaurant liquor licenses in an area designated as a neighborhood and others in close proximity thereto, a finding by the licensing authority of lack of need for issuance of license applied for, based upon a fair appraisal of the evidence, cannot be held to be arbitrary. Schooley v. Steinberg, 148 Colo. 222, 365 P.2d 245 (1961).
Where the record disclosed two package liquor outlets and two establishments serving liquor by the drink within half to three quarters of a mile of applicant's location, denial of a package liquor license by board of county commissioners was not arbitrary or capricious. Malouff v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 150 Colo. 11, 370 P.2d 161 (1962).
Where the board of commissioners did not refuse to receive any evidence offered, and the evidence showed the location of the proposed dispensary to be in close proximity to a state college, and where the board had before it protests admitted to have been made by many of the officials of the college and of the public schools, as well as petitions signed by citizens, the court could not say that the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously in refusing a license when such action was based on evidence from which reasonable men might honestly draw different conclusions. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Prima facie need for license shown. Where prior to condemnation by the state for highway purposes, there were two successful outlets in Silver Plume; that because of the condemnation proceedings there were none at the time of the application; that the nearest such outlet was two and one-half miles away; that 34 residents indicated the need for such an outlet; and where after denial of the application, but prior to the district court's review thereof, the trustees issued a similar license to a nearby establishment, the evidence constitutes a prima facie showing of need for the license. Booth v. Trustees of Town of Silver Plume, 28 Colo. App. 470, 474 P.2d 227 (1970).
44-3-304. State licensing authority - application and issuance procedures - definitions - rules.
-
- Applications for licenses under the provisions of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 shall be made to the state licensing authority on forms prepared and furnished by the state licensing authority and shall set forth such information as the state licensing authority may require to enable the authority to determine whether a license should be granted. The information shall include the name and address of the applicant, and if a partnership, also the names and addresses of all the partners, and if a corporation, association, or other organization, also the names and addresses of the president, vice-president, secretary, and managing officer, together with all other information deemed necessary by the licensing authority. Each application shall be verified by the oath or affirmation of the person or persons as the state licensing authority may prescribe.
- Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (1)(a) of this section, an applicant seeking licenses for multiple locations may request the state licensing authority to establish a master file. All requests for a master file shall be made on forms provided by the state licensing authority and shall contain such information as the state licensing authority may require to enable the authority to determine the suitability of the license applicant and its principal owners as required pursuant to section 44-3-307. The state licensing authority shall either approve the request for a master file and issue an approval letter, or deny the request pursuant to the provisions of section 44-3-305. Any change to information contained in the master file shall be reported by the applicant or licensee to the state licensing authority within thirty days after the change. Failure to report all changes as required may be grounds for suspension or revocation of a license or licenses as determined by the state licensing authority. No local licensing authority shall require applicants with an approved master file to file additional background investigation forms or fingerprints. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a local licensing authority from conducting its own investigation, or from verifying any of the information provided by the applicant, or from denying the application of the applicant pursuant to the provisions set forth in section 44-3-307.
- As used in this part 3, "master file" means a file that is established by the state licensing authority and that contains licensing and background information for an applicant seeking licenses pursuant to this article 3 in multiple locations. The master file shall be available to the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules governing the minimum number of multiple locations required to establish and maintain a master file.
-
- Before granting any license for which application has been made, the state licensing authority or one or more of its inspectors may visit and inspect the plant or property in which the applicant proposes to conduct business and investigate the fitness to conduct such business of any person or the officers and directors of any corporation applying for a license. In investigating the fitness of the applicant or a licensee, the state licensing authority may have access to criminal history record information furnished by a criminal justice agency, subject to any restrictions imposed by such agency. In the event the state licensing authority takes into consideration information concerning the applicant's criminal history record, the state licensing authority shall also consider any information provided by the applicant regarding such criminal history record, including but not limited to evidence of rehabilitation, character references, and educational achievements, especially those items pertaining to the period of time between the applicant's last criminal conviction and the consideration of the application for a license.
- As used in subsection (2)(a) of this section, "criminal justice agency" means any federal, state, or municipal court or any governmental agency or subunit of such agency that performs the administration of criminal justice pursuant to a statute or executive order and that allocates a substantial part of its annual budget to the administration of criminal justice.
- The state licensing authority shall not issue a license pursuant to this section until the local licensing authority has approved the application provided for in section 44-3-309.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 976, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-304 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For note, "The Liquor Code -- Colorado Revised Statute Antiquated", see 38 U. Colo. L. Rev. 248 (1965).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Applicability of liquor code. The provisions of this article do not apply to third persons who are not applicants of licensees and whose conduct does not violate specific provisions of this article but does violate specific provisions of the criminal code. People v. Eckley, 775 P.2d 566 (Colo. 1989).
The issuance of licenses shall depend on the judgment of the licensing authority and not on that of other citizens. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
Whether a license should or should not be granted is a matter resting within the discretion of the licensing authority, and will not be disturbed in the absence of a showing of abuse of that discretion. Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
It is within the discretion of the licensing authority to determine the facts and to conclude that an application should be denied. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
There is no inherent right to carry on the business of selling alcoholic beverages. The licensing authority in the exercise of its administrative discretion may determine whether in the light of all the evidence and surrounding facts and circumstances, the granting of a particular license is or is not justified. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
It is nowhere provided that the state licensing authority must conduct a public hearing. Potter v. Anderson, 155 Colo. 25, 392 P.2d 650 (1964).
State may use local investigative reports. There is nothing in the law that makes it illegal for the state licensing authority to use the investigation reports and hearing record of the local licensing authority which by law must conduct a hearing. Potter v. Anderson, 155 Colo. 25, 392 P.2d 650 (1964).
Denial of second application for particular location. This section provides in substance that no application for a liquor license shall be granted for a particular location if the same applicant has been denied a license for that location within two years prior to the second application. Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
The holder of a liquor license cannot apply for a transfer of his license to a facility where, during the preceding two years, a license has been denied for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants were being satisfied by existing outlets. Sixth Ave. Liquors, Inc. v. Kalbin, 44 Colo. App. 232, 615 P.2d 56 (1980).
A sole applicant for issuance of a license is not "the same person or persons" as a partnership, whose application for a liquor license had previously been denied. Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
Burden on applicant. It is incumbent upon an applicant for a liquor license to make a prima facie showing of facts which satisfy the requisites of the liquor code. Geer v. Hall, 138 Colo. 384, 333 P.2d 1040 (1959).
All reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the findings of the licensing authority, and unless it clearly appears that under the whole record an action of that authority is arbitrary and capricious, the supreme court may not order a different result. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959); Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
Duty to consider neighborhood requirements and desires. The licensing authority has the duty and authority to consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants as evidenced by petition, remonstrances, or otherwise. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959).
The test in consideration of a license application is still the "desires of the inhabitants" and "the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood". Travella v. Eppinger, 152 Colo. 506, 383 P.2d 314 (1963).
Applied in In re Title Pertaining to Sale of Table Wine in Grocery Stores, 646 P.2d 916 (Colo. 1982).
44-3-305. Denial of application.
- The state licensing authority shall refuse a state license if the premises on which the applicant proposes to conduct its business do not meet the requirements of this article 3, or if the character of the applicant or its officers or directors is such that violations of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 would be likely to result if a license were granted, or if in its opinion licenses already granted for the particular locality are adequate for the reasonable needs of the community.
- The state licensing authority shall not refuse a state license after a local license has been granted, except upon hearing after fifteen days' notice to the applicant and to the local licensing authority. The notice shall be in writing and shall state grounds upon which the application may be refused. If the applicant does not respond to the notice within fifteen days after the date of the notice, the application for a license shall be denied. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of section 24-4-105, and judicial review of the state licensing authority's decision shall be pursuant to section 24-4-106.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 978, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-305 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "Antitrust", see 55 Den. L.J. 415 (1978).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Three grounds for refusal. By the express provisions of this section, the state licensing authority is authorized and directed to refuse to grant a license for the failure of an applicant to meet statutory requirements in three particulars only, viz: (1) that the premises for which the license is sought do not meet the requirements of the law; (2) that the character of applicant or its officers is such that violation of the liquor law would likely result; and (3) that existing outlets are adequate for the reasonable needs of the community. MacArthur v. Bishop, 123 Colo. 452, 230 P.2d 589 (1951); Stanley v. Anderson, 158 Colo. 576, 408 P.2d 984 (1965).
This section contains no requirement of formal findings. MacArthur v. Bishop, 123 Colo. 452, 230 P.2d 589 (1951).
Where there was substantial evidence to support the action of the licensing authority, and no jurisdictional or quasi-jurisdictional determination or finding was required, and no specific findings were requested and refused, the decision of the licensing authority to refuse a license could not be challenged on the ground that he failed to make any findings or state any reason for his refusal. MacArthur v. Bishop, 123 Colo. 452, 230 P.2d 589 (1951).
Witnesses not required. The power of an agency to do justice informally and promptly is not limited to cases where witnesses have been heard, and without any witnesses at all it may act of its own knowledge, for it is made up of men with special qualifications of training and experience. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
When an agency acts on its own knowledge, it must set forth in its return the facts known to its members, but not otherwise disclosed. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
Facts as to hardship required. To characterize a situation as a hardship without more does not tend in any substantial degree to enlighten a reviewing court, and therefore there must be disclosure of the facts from which a hardship is inferred. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
Notice of hearing responsibility of local authority. The question of whether there has been compliance with the requirement that notice of hearing be given upon the application for a county license is a matter which has been specifically and exclusively entrusted to the local licensing authority. Stanley v. Anderson, 158 Colo. 576, 408 P.2d 984 (1965).
Finding of adequacy of notice binding. The determination of the commissioners on the issue of whether posting of notice of hearing before the commissioners has been adequate is binding upon the state licensing authority. Stanley v. Anderson, 158 Colo. 576, 408 P.2d 984 (1965).
The state licensing authority does not have statutory authority to inquire into the adequacy of posting, once the local licensing authority has made its determination of such question. Stanley v. Anderson, 158 Colo. 576, 408 P.2d 984 (1965).
To favor one applicant over another is discriminatory and suggests the exercise of an unwarranted and uncontrolled discretion on the part of the licensing authority. Geer v. Presto, 135 Colo. 536, 313 P.2d 980 (1957).
Basis for finding denial arbitrary and capricious. Capricious or arbitrary exercise of discretion by an administrative board can arise by exercising its discretion in such manner after a consideration of evidence before it as clearly to indicate that its action is based on conclusions from the evidence such that reasonable men fairly and honestly considering the evidence must reach contrary conclusions. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
Denial not arbitrary and capricious. Where the record of a hearing on an application for a liquor license discloses a situation with reference to which reasonable minds might reach different conclusions, the action of the board of county commissioners in denying such application cannot be adjudged arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable as a matter of law. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bonicelli, 151 Colo. 308, 377 P.2d 124 (1962).
Evidence sufficient to deny license. Where a plat put in evidence disclosed the existence of 93 liquor outlets within a radius of six blocks of the premises for which the license was sought, and of these, more than half were hotel and restaurant licenses, the evidence was sufficient to support the denial of a hotel and restaurant liquor license. MacArthur v. Bishop, 123 Colo. 452, 230 P.2d 589 (1951).
Issuance of a license to another person in an area, shortly after the rejection of applicant's application on the ground that the needs of the neighborhood were satisfied, would be arbitrary and discriminatory. Geer v. Presto, 135 Colo. 536, 313 P.2d 980 (1957).
44-3-306. Inactive licenses.
The state or local licensing authority, in its discretion, may revoke or elect not to renew a retail license if it determines that the licensed premises has been inactive, without good cause, for at least one year or, in the case of a retail license approved for a facility that has not been constructed, the facility has not been constructed and placed in operation within two years after approval of the license application or construction of the facility has not commenced within one year after the approval.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 978, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-306 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-307. Persons prohibited as licensees - definition.
-
-
No license provided by this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 shall be issued to or held by:
- Any person until the annual fee therefor has been paid;
- Any person who is not of good moral character;
- Any corporation, any of whose officers, directors, or stockholders holding ten percent or more of the outstanding and issued capital stock thereof are not of good moral character;
- Any partnership, association, or company, any of whose officers, or any of whose members holding ten percent or more interest therein, are not of good moral character;
- Any person employing, assisted by, or financed in whole or in part by any other person who is not of good character and reputation satisfactory to the respective licensing authorities;
- Any person unless the person's character, record, and reputation are satisfactory to the respective licensing authority;
- Any natural person under twenty-one years of age.
-
- In making a determination as to character or when considering the conviction of a crime, a licensing authority shall be governed by the provisions of section 24-5-101.
- With respect to arts or club license applications, an investigation of the character of the president or chair of the board and the operational manager shall be deemed sufficient to determine whether to issue the arts or club license to the applicant.
-
No license provided by this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 shall be issued to or held by:
-
- No license provided by this article 3 shall be issued to or held by a peace officer described in section 16-2.5-121, 16-2.5-122, 16-2.5-123, 16-2.5-125, 16-2.5-126, 16-2.5-128, or 16-2.5-129, or the state licensing authority or any of its inspectors or employees.
- A peace officer described in section 16-2.5-103, 16-2.5-105, 16-2.5-108, 16-2.5-132, or 16-2.5-149 may not obtain or hold a license under this article 3 to operate a licensed premises that is located within the same jurisdiction that employs the peace officer.
-
- In investigating the qualifications of the applicant or a licensee, the local licensing authority may have access to criminal history record information furnished by a criminal justice agency, subject to any restrictions imposed by such agency. In the event the local licensing authority takes into consideration information concerning the applicant's criminal history record, the local licensing authority shall also consider any information provided by the applicant regarding such criminal history record, including but not limited to evidence of rehabilitation, character references, and educational achievements, especially those items pertaining to the period of time between the applicant's last criminal conviction and the consideration of the application for a license.
- As used in subsection (3)(a) of this section, "criminal justice agency" means any federal, state, or municipal court or any governmental agency or subunit of such agency that performs the administration of criminal justice pursuant to a statute or executive order and that allocates a substantial part of its annual budget to the administration of criminal justice.
-
At the time of the application for a license, the applicant shall submit fingerprints and file personal history information concerning the applicant's qualifications for a license on forms prepared by the state licensing authority. The state and local licensing authorities shall submit the fingerprints to the Colorado bureau of investigation for the purpose of conducting fingerprint-based criminal history record checks. The Colorado bureau of investigation shall forward the fingerprints to the federal bureau of investigation for the purpose of conducting fingerprint-based criminal history record checks. When the results of a fingerprint-based criminal history record check of an applicant performed pursuant to this section reveal a record of arrest without a disposition, the licensing authority shall require the applicant to submit to a name-based judicial record check, as defined in section 22-2-119.3 (6)(d). The licensing authorities shall use the information resulting from the fingerprint-based criminal history record check and, if applicable, name-based judicial record check to investigate and to determine if an applicant is qualified for a license pursuant to this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44. The licensing authority may verify any of the information required to be submitted by an applicant pursuant to this section. An applicant shall not be required to submit additional information beyond that required in this subsection (3) unless the licensing authority has determined any of the following:
- The applicant has misrepresented a material fact;
- The applicant has an established criminal history record;
- A prior criminal or administrative proceeding determined that the applicant violated alcohol beverage laws;
- The information submitted by an applicant is incomplete; or
- The character, record, or reputation of the applicant, his or her agent, or his or her principal is such that a potential violation of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 may occur if a license is issued to the applicant.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 978, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: IP(3)(c) amended, (HB 19-1166), ch. 125, p. 559, § 52, effective April 18. L. 2022: IP(3)(c) amended, (HB 22-1270), ch. 114, p. 534, § 56, effective April 21.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-307 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "Moral C haracter of the Liquor Licensee or Applicant", see 25 C olo. Law. 79 (Feb. 1996).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Only offenses involving "moral turpitude" basis for denial. This section as "governed" and modified by § 24-5-101 requires that only those offenses involving "moral turpitude" can serve as justification for denial of a liquor license. Hartman v. Wadlow, 37 Colo. App. 90, 545 P.2d 735 (1975), aff'd, 191 Colo. 196, 551 P.2d 201 (1976).
Negative response to question regarding suspension or revocation of liquor license was a misrepresentation of a material fact with respect to prior cancelled license and, therefore, could constitute grounds for license revocation. Fueston v. City of Colo. Springs, 713 P.2d 1323 (Colo. App. 1985).
Not driving while ability impaired. While "driving a motor vehicle while ability is impaired" is a serious offense, nevertheless it does not rise to the magnitude of being one involving moral turpitude. Hartman v. Wadlow, 37 Colo. App. 90, 545 P.2d 735 (1975), aff'd, 191 Colo. 196, 551 P.2d 201 (1976).
Effect of nolo contendere plea. The state licensing authority cannot utilize the plea of nolo contendere at a hearing called by him as evidence of a conviction of a violation of the liquor law. Bruce v. Leo, 129 Colo. 129, 267 P.2d 1014 (1954).
This section prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor by the drink within 500 feet of a public or parochial school. Geer v. Rabinoff, 138 Colo. 8, 328 P.2d 375 (1958); Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
The general assembly has enacted no such restriction on the sale of liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. Geer v. Rabinoff, 138 Colo. 8, 328 P.2d 375 (1958).
An area covered by a parking lot adjacent to restaurant is not to be considered in computing distance from a school. Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
No liquor can be sold on a parking lot. Harvey v. Schooley, 152 Colo. 384, 382 P.2d 189 (1963).
"Record" defined. Although the word "record", referred to in paragraph (1)(a)(VIII), may be somewhat broad, its context certainly includes violations of statutory law of the state. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. Dolan, 197 Colo. 195, 591 P.2d 1021 (1979).
Judicial review of licensing board. A liquor licensing board which revokes or suspends a license under this section is subject to judicial review for abuse of discretion. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. Dolan, 197 Colo. 195, 591 P.2d 1021 (1979).
Applied in Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
44-3-308. Unlawful financial assistance.
-
-
-
It is unlawful for any person licensed pursuant to this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer, or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with any of said licensees, to furnish, supply, or loan, in any manner, directly or indirectly, to any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44:
(1) (a) (I) It is unlawful for any person licensed pursuant to this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer, or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with any of said licensees, to furnish, supply, or loan, in any manner, directly or indirectly, to any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44:
- Any financial assistance, including the extension of credit for more than thirty days, as specified in section 44-3-202 (2)(b) or in rules of the state licensing authority; or
- Any equipment, fixtures, chattels, or furnishings used in the storing, handling, serving, or dispensing of food or alcohol beverages within the premises or for making any structural alterations or improvements in or on the building in which the premises is located.
-
This subsection (1) does not:
- Apply to signs or displays within the licensed premises; or
- Prevent a representative, employee, or agent of a person licensed under this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer from pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverage products as part of a tasting being conducted on the licensed premises of a person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail for off-premises consumption, and pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverages does not constitute labor provided by a person licensed under this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer to a person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail.
-
It is unlawful for any person licensed pursuant to this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer, or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with any of said licensees, to furnish, supply, or loan, in any manner, directly or indirectly, to any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44:
(1) (a) (I) It is unlawful for any person licensed pursuant to this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer, or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with any of said licensees, to furnish, supply, or loan, in any manner, directly or indirectly, to any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44:
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1)(a) of this section, any person or party described in subsection (1)(a) of this section may provide financial or in-kind assistance, directly or indirectly, to a nonprofit arts organization that has been issued an arts license pursuant to section 44-3-419 or to a state-supported institution of higher education in Colorado, including local district colleges, area technical colleges, and the Auraria higher education center, or the governing board of a state-supported institution of higher education, or to a nonpublic institution of higher education as defined in section 23-3.7-102 that is operating pursuant to 26 U.S.C. sec. 501 (c)(3) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, if the institution has been issued a license pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44.
-
- The state licensing authority, by rule, shall require a complete disclosure of all persons having a direct or indirect financial interest, and the extent of such interest, in each hotel and restaurant license and each retail gaming tavern license issued under this article 3. A willful failure to report and disclose the financial interests of all persons having a direct or indirect financial interest in a hotel and restaurant license or in a retail gaming tavern license shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of such license by the state licensing authority. The invalidity of any provision of this subsection (2) concerning interest in more than one hotel and restaurant license or retail gaming tavern license shall invalidate all interests in more than one hotel and restaurant license or retail gaming tavern license, and such invalidity shall make any such interest unlawful financial assistance.
-
-
- It is unlawful for any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 to receive and obtain from the persons or parties described and referred to in subsection (1)(a) of this section, directly or indirectly, any financial assistance or any equipment, fixtures, chattels, or furnishings used in the storing, handling, serving, or dispensing of food or alcohol beverages within the premises or from making any structural alterations or improvements in or on the building on which the premises is located. (3) (a) (I) It is unlawful for any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 to receive and obtain from the persons or parties described and referred to in subsection (1)(a) of this section, directly or indirectly, any financial assistance or any equipment, fixtures, chattels, or furnishings used in the storing, handling, serving, or dispensing of food or alcohol beverages within the premises or from making any structural alterations or improvements in or on the building on which the premises is located.
-
This subsection (3) does not:
- Apply to signs or displays within the premises or to advertising materials that are intended primarily to advertise the product of the wholesaler or manufacturer and that have only negligible value in themselves or to the inspection and servicing of malt or vinous liquor-dispensing equipment to the extent necessary for the maintenance of reasonable standards of purity, cleanliness, and health; or
- Prevent a representative, employee, or agent of a licensee described and referred to in subsection (1)(a) of this section from pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverage products as part of a tasting being conducted on the licensed premises of the person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail for off-premises consumption, and pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverages does not constitute labor provided by a licensee described in subsection (1)(a) of this section to a person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (3)(a) of this section, a nonprofit arts organization that has been issued an arts license pursuant to section 44-3-419 or a state-supported institution of higher education in Colorado, including local district colleges, area technical colleges, and the Auraria higher education center, or the governing board of a state-supported institution of higher education, or a nonpublic institution of higher education as defined in section 23-3.7-102 that is operating pursuant to 26 U.S.C. sec. 501 (c)(3) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, if the institution has been issued a license pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44, may receive financial or in-kind assistance, directly or indirectly, from the persons or parties described and referred to in subsection (1)(a) of this section.
-
-
- Except as otherwise authorized, it is unlawful for any person or corporation holding any license pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 or any person who is a stockholder, director, or officer of any corporation holding a license pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 to be a stockholder, director, or officer or to be interested, directly or indirectly, in any person or corporation that lends money to any person or corporation licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, but this subsection (4) does not apply to banks or savings and loan associations supervised and regulated by an agency of the state or federal government, or to FHA-approved mortgagees, or to stockholders, directors, or officers thereof; and it is unlawful for any person or corporation licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, or any stockholder, director, or officer of such corporation, to make any loan or be interested, directly or indirectly, in any loan to any other person licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that this subsection (4)(a) does not apply to any financial institution that comes into possession of a licensed premises by virtue of a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure if the financial institution does not retain such premises for longer than one year or for such time exceeding one year as provided in subsection (4)(b) of this section.
- In the case of a financial institution that comes into possession of a licensed premises by virtue of a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, the state and the local licensing authority may grant a transfer of ownership for such license for a period of one year and, upon notice and hearing, renewal of such license may be granted. This subsection (4)(b) shall apply in the case of every foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure in which disposition of the license has not otherwise been made by the state or local licensing authority.
-
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, stockholder, or person interested, directly or indirectly, in any retail business or establishment of a person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 to enter into any agreement with any person or party or to receive, possess, or accept any money, fixtures, supplies, or things of value from any person or party, whereby a person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 may be influenced or caused, directly or indirectly, to buy, sell, dispense, or handle the product of any manufacturer of alcohol beverages.
-
This subsection (5) does not:
- Apply to displays within the premises; or
- Prevent a representative, employee, or agent of a person licensed under this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer from pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverage products as part of a tasting being conducted on the licensed premises of a person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail for off-premises consumption, and pouring or serving the licensee's alcohol beverages does not constitute labor provided by a person licensed under this article 3 as a manufacturer, limited winery, wholesaler, or importer to a person licensed under this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages at retail.
- Any transaction, agreement, or arrangement prohibited by the provisions of this section, if made and entered into by and between the persons and parties described and referred to in this section, is unlawful, illegal, invalid, and void, and any obligation or liability arising out of such transaction, agreement, or arrangement shall be unenforceable in any court of this state by or against any such persons and parties entering into the transaction, agreement, or arrangement.
- This section is intended to prohibit and prevent the control of the outlets for the sale of alcohol beverages by any persons or parties other than the persons licensed pursuant to the provisions of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44.
- It is unlawful for an owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a brew pub, distillery pub, or vintner's restaurant license to conduct, own in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in a wholesaler's license issued under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
Source: L. 2018: (1)(a), (3)(a), and (5) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2198, § 6, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 980, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: IP(1)(a)(I), (1)(a)(II)(B), and (5)(b)(II) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 6, § 7, effective January 31.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-308 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsections (1)(a), (3)(a), and (5) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-308 (1)(a), (3)(a), and (5), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "The C olorado Liquor C ode: Distinct and Definite Requirements", see 17 Colo. Law. 841 (1988).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
This section interdicts any transaction, agreement, or arrangement prohibited by it and provides that any obligation or liability arising out of any such transaction, agreement, or arrangement shall be unenforceable in any court by or against any such persons and parties entering into such transaction. Fishman v. Davis, 112 F.2d 432 (10th Cir. 1940).
A plain reading of this section demonstrates that the general assembly did not speak to the precise question of below-cost sales of alcohol by manufacturers to retailer, and therefore deference to agency construction is appropriate. Wine & Spirits Wholesalers v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 919 P.2d 894 (Colo. App. 1996).
A person who held a retail liquor license could not acquire an interest in the business of a bankrupt wholesaler, and a transaction whereby he attempts to acquire such an interest is void under this section and any claim or obligation arising therefrom is unenforceable, because he could not advance money to the bankrupt for an interest in its business and obtain a claim which was enforceable in the bankruptcy court against the estate. Fishman v. Davis, 112 F.2d 432 (10th Cir. 1940).
Finding of lack of any indirect interest in another retail liquor store is supported by competent evidence on the record and is not arbitrary nor capricious. The evidence does not show that the stock transfer of ownership of another liquor store to the wife of the licensee was a sham transaction nor that the licensee retained control of or any interest in another liquor store. Brass Monkey v. Louisville City Council, 870 P.2d 636 (Colo. App. 1994).
Liquor wholesaler's extension of credit to retailer unaccompanied with control or attempt to control is not unlawful under the Colorado liquor law. Majestic Marketing Co. v. Anderson Enters. of Colo., Inc. 32 Colo. App. 369, 511 P.2d 943 (1973).
Where decedent, part owner of one bar, advanced money for the construction and equipment of another bar, plaintiff claiming by and through decedent as his heir and as executrix of decedent's estate was barred from recovering moneys advanced by decedent for construction of the other bar. Frederics v. Wilson, 31 Colo. App. 117, 500 P.2d 384 (1972).
When asserting rights of decedent, a claimant is subject to the limitations appurtenant to any claim decedent might have had, thus, the working of this section itself, and clear public policy, would bar recovery. Frederics v. Wilson, 31 Colo. App. 117, 500 P.2d 384 (1972).
Giving of a chattel mortgage was in violation of this section. Fishman v. Davis, 112 F.2d 432 (10th Cir. 1940).
Installment sale by wholesaler not prohibited. Absent proof of control or attempt to control a retail licensee by a wholesale licensee, an installment sale or lease of equipment by a wholesaler to a retailer is not prohibited by this section. Nobel, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 652 P.2d 1084 (Colo. App. 1982).
Installment sale by wholesaler does not constitute unlawful financial assistance. The leasing of equipment and the sale of equipment on credit by a wholesale liquor licensee to a retail liquor licensee, absent control or attempt to control the retail licensee, does not constitute unlawful financial assistance. Nobel, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 652 P.2d 1084 (Colo. App. 1982).
Applied in Law Offices of Bernard D. Morley, P.C. v. MacFarlane, 647 P.2d 1215 (Colo. 1982); People v. Luciano, 662 P.2d 480 (Colo. 1983).
44-3-309. Local licensing authority - applications - optional premises licenses.
-
A local licensing authority may issue only the following alcohol beverage licenses upon payment of the fee specified in section 44-3-505:
- Retail liquor store license;
- Liquor-licensed drugstore license;
- Beer and wine license;
- Hotel and restaurant license;
- Tavern license;
- Brew pub license;
- Club license;
- Arts license;
- Racetrack license;
- Optional premises license;
- Retail gaming tavern license;
- Vintner's restaurant license;
- Distillery pub license;
- Lodging and entertainment license.
- An application for any license specified in subsection (1) of this section or section 44-4-107 shall be filed with the appropriate local licensing authority on forms provided by the state licensing authority and containing such information as the state licensing authority may require. Each application shall be verified by the oath or affirmation of such persons as prescribed by the state licensing authority.
- The applicant shall file at the time of application plans and specifications for the interior of the building if the building to be occupied is in existence at the time. If the building is not in existence, the applicant shall file a plot plan and a detailed sketch for the interior and submit an architect's drawing of the building to be constructed. In its discretion, the local licensing authority may impose additional requirements necessary for the approval of the application.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 983, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-309 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Before there can be any issuance of a liquor license or a transfer thereof at the local level, the state authority must approve the action of the local authority. Moschetti v. Liquor Licensing Auth., 176 Colo. 281, 490 P.2d 299 (1971).
Oath requirement is mandatory. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
The requirement that the contents of a liquor license application be verified is mandatory. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. City of Glendale, 42 Colo. App. 322, 596 P.2d 1218 (1979).
Private parties may not waive requirements. Because the requirement of a verified application is mandatory and because statutes dealing with the liquor industry are founded on public policy, and constitute an exercise of the police powers of the state, private parties may not waive the requirements of this statute. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Failure to verify properly application prior to expiration date for filing renewal application is not fatal, because a hearing on the application may be held after the filing period has expired. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. City of Glendale, 42 Colo. App. 322, 596 P.2d 1218 (1979).
Amendment made on license application and sworn to anew. Where an applicant desires to amend his application required for a liquor license either by changing an answer previously given or by furnishing answers to questions not previously answered, the amendment must be made on the application itself and sworn to anew. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Liquor license application may be amended prior to or at hearing to review application in order to correct or add information thereto. A proper verification for the application can be supplied prior to or at the hearing on the application. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. City of Glendale, 42 Colo. App. 322, 596 P.2d 1218 (1979).
Term "plans and specifications" in subsection (4) has a special meaning and includes not only the dimensions and mode of construction, but a description of the material, its kind, length, breadth, and thickness, and the manner of joining the separate parts. It is a particular and detailed account; the accurate description of the materials to be used and work to be performed in the construction of a building; a written instrument containing a good minute description, account, or enumeration of particulars. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Failure to file specifications more than formal defect. The failure of liquor license applicant to have detailed specifications of the interior as required under subsection (4) is more than a formal defect. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Failure to file building plans at the time of the application is not fatal. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
There is no statutory prohibition against amending an application or supplying a deficiency prior to the consideration of the application, or at the hearing. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
May file specifications up to and including hearing. An applicant for a liquor license can file the plans and specifications and architect's drawings required under subsection (4) at any time up to and including the hearing. Spero v. Bd. of Trustees, 35 Colo. App. 64, 529 P.2d 327 (1974).
Applied in City of Aurora v. Morris, 160 Colo. 289, 417 P.2d 7 (1966).
44-3-310. Optional premises license - local option.
- No optional premises license, or optional premises permit for a hotel and restaurant license, as defined in section 44-3-103 (33)(a), shall be issued within any municipality or the unincorporated portion of any county unless the governing body of the municipality has adopted by ordinance, or the governing body of the county has adopted by resolution, specific standards for the issuance of optional premises licenses or for optional premises for a hotel and restaurant license. No municipality or county shall be required to adopt such standards or make such licenses available within its jurisdiction.
-
In addition to all other standards applicable to the issuance of licenses under this article 3, the governing body may adopt additional standards for the issuance of optional premises licenses or for optional premises for a hotel and restaurant license that may include:
- The specific types of outdoor sports and recreational facilities that are eligible to apply for an optional premises license or an optional premises for a hotel and restaurant license;
- Restrictions on the number of optional premises that any one licensee may have on an outdoor sports or recreational facility;
- A restriction on the minimum size of any applicant's outdoor sports or recreational facility that would be eligible for the issuance of an optional premises license or optional premises for a hotel and restaurant license;
- Any other requirements necessary to ensure the control of the premises and the ease of enforcement.
- An applicant for a hotel and restaurant license who desires to sell or serve alcohol beverages on optional premises shall file with the optional premises permit application a list of the optional premises locations. The application and list shall be filed with the state and local licensing authorities upon initial application, and each license year thereafter. Approval of the areas must be obtained from the state licensing authority and the local licensing authority. The decision of each authority shall be discretionary. In the event that the state and local licensing authorities allow the area or areas to be designated optional premises, no alcohol beverages may be served on the optional premises without the licensee having provided written notice to the state and local licensing authorities forty-eight hours prior to serving alcohol beverages on the optional premises. The notice shall contain the specific days and hours on which the optional premises are to be used. This subsection (3) shall not be construed to permit the violation of any other provision of this article 3 under circumstances not specified in this subsection (3).
- An applicant for an optional premises license who desires to sell, dispense, or serve alcohol beverages on optional premises shall file with the optional premises license application a list of the optional premises locations and the area in which the applicant desires to store alcohol beverages for future use on the optional premises. The applicant shall file the application and additional information with the state and local licensing authorities upon initial application and each license year thereafter. Approval of the license and areas must be obtained from the state licensing authority and the local licensing authority. The decision of each authority shall be discretionary. In the event that the state and local licensing authorities allow the area or areas to be designated optional premises, no alcohol beverages may be served on the optional premises without the licensee having provided written notice to the state and local licensing authorities forty-eight hours prior to serving alcohol beverages on the optional premises. The notice must contain the specific days and hours on which the optional premises are to be used. This subsection (4) does not permit the violation of any other provision of this article 3 under circumstances not specified in this subsection (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 983, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-310 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-311. Public notice - posting and publication - definition.
- Upon receipt of an application, except an application for renewal or for transfer of ownership, the local licensing authority shall schedule a public hearing upon the application not less than thirty days from the date of the application and shall post and publish the public notice thereof not less than ten days prior to the hearing. Public notice shall be given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises for which application has been made and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the premises are located.
- Notice given by posting shall include a sign of suitable material, not less than twenty-two inches wide and twenty-six inches high, composed of letters not less than one inch in height and stating the type of license applied for, the date of the application, the date of the hearing, and the name and address of the applicant, and such other information as may be required to fully apprise the public of the nature of the application. If the applicant is a partnership, the sign shall contain the names and addresses of all partners, and if the applicant is a corporation, association, or other organization, the sign shall contain the names and addresses of the president, vice president, secretary, and manager or other managing officers.
- Notice given by publication shall contain the same information as that required for signs.
- If the building in which the alcohol beverage is to be sold is in existence at the time of the application, any sign posted as required in subsections (1) and (2) of this section shall be placed so as to be conspicuous and plainly visible to the general public. If the building is not constructed at the time of the application, the applicant shall post the premises upon which the building is to be constructed in such a manner that the notice shall be conspicuous and plainly visible to the general public.
-
- At the public hearing held pursuant to this section, any party in interest shall be allowed to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses.
-
As used in this subsection (5), "party in interest" means any of the following:
- The applicant;
- An adult resident of the neighborhood under consideration;
- The owner or manager of a business located in the neighborhood under consideration;
- The principal or representative of any school located within five hundred feet of the premises for which the issuance of a license pursuant to section 44-3-309 (1) is under consideration.
- The local licensing authority, in its discretion, may limit the presentation of evidence and cross-examination so as to prevent repetitive and cumulative evidence or examination.
- Nothing in this subsection (5) shall be construed to prevent a representative of an organized neighborhood group that encompasses part or all of the neighborhood under consideration from presenting evidence subject to this section. The representative shall reside within the neighborhood group's geographic boundaries and shall be a member of the neighborhood group. The representative shall not be entitled to cross-examine witnesses or seek judicial review of the licensing authority's decision.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 985, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-311 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "A Primer on Liquor License Application Hearings in C olorado", see 31 C olo. Law. 11 (Sept. 2002).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
An owner of a business located within the neighborhood is a party in interest to the extent that he may present evidence at the hearing before the licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
A competitor has standing to challenge granting of a liquor license and to appeal any adverse judgment if the competitor is also a resident of the affected neighborhood. Brass Monkey v. Louisville City Council, 870 P.2d 636 (Colo. App. 1994).
The term "party in interest" grants only the limited right to participate in the evidentiary hearing and not the right to participate as a party in judicial proceedings to review the action of the licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193, Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
No-cross-examination order exceeded council authority. While the licensing authority may limit the presentation of evidence and cross-examination so as to prevent repetitive or cumulative evidence or cross-examination, the council exceeded its authority by arbitrarily ordering that no cross-examination of witnesses would be allowed at this public hearing. Mobell v. Meyer, 172 Colo. 12, 469 P.2d 414 (1970).
44-3-312. Results of investigation - decision of authorities.
- Not less than five days prior to the date of hearing, the local licensing authority shall make known its findings based on its investigation in writing to the applicant and other interested parties. The local licensing authority has authority to refuse to issue any licenses provided in sections 44-3-309 (1) and 44-4-107 for good cause, subject to judicial review.
-
- Before entering any decision approving or denying the application, the local licensing authority shall consider, except where this article 3 specifically provides otherwise, the facts and evidence adduced as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type, and availability of alcohol beverage outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed; except that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood shall not be considered in the issuance of a club liquor license. For the merger and conversion of retail liquor store licenses to a single liquor-licensed drugstore license in accordance with section 44-3-410 (1)(b), the local licensing authority shall consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the adult inhabitants of the neighborhood.
- Any petitioning otherwise required to establish the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood shall be waived for a bed and breakfast permit applicant unless the local licensing authority has previously taken affirmative, official action to rescind the availability of such waiver in all subsequent cases.
- Any decision of a local licensing authority approving or denying an application shall be in writing stating the reasons therefor within thirty days after the date of the public hearing, and a copy of the decision shall be sent by certified mail to the applicant at the address shown in the application.
- No license shall be issued by any local licensing authority after approval of an application until the building in which the business is to be conducted is ready for occupancy with such furniture, fixtures, and equipment in place as is necessary to comply with the applicable provisions of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44, and then only after inspection of the premises has been made by the licensing authority to determine that the applicant has complied with the architect's drawing and the plot plan and detailed sketch for the interior of the building submitted with the application.
- After approval of any application, the local licensing authority shall notify the state licensing authority of the approval, who shall investigate and either approve or disapprove such application.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 986, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-312 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "A Primer on Liquor License Application Hearings in C olorado", see 31 C olo. Law. 11 (Sept. 2002).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
In forfeiture removal action, absent the owner's permission, it is a trespass for the officers to remain on the premises longer than is necessary to remove the seized property. Walker v. City of Denver, 720 P.2d 619 (Colo. App. 1986).
While the right of public officers to seize personal property carries with it the right to remove the property from the premises, such removal is unjustified if it would result in the destruction or substantial damage to the real property. Walker v. City of Denver, 720 P.2d 619 (Colo. App. 1986).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by the existing licenses. Canjar v. Huerta, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Date of city council's written decision commenced 30-day period. Where the city council approved an application for a package liquor license and entered its written decision in the form of a statement of approval upon the license application form, which was signed by the mayor and attested by the city clerk, it is the date of the written decision, endorsed upon the application form, and not the date on which applicants received the letter of notification, which commences the 30-day period within which to appeal the decision. White v. City Council, 33 Colo. App. 97, 515 P.2d 487 (1973).
The period of limitation under subsection (3) of this section was properly measured from the conclusion of a second hearing where, at the conclusion of the first hearing on the license application, the matter was tabled for further consideration, and no final action was taken. U-Tote-M of Colo., Inc. v. City of Greenwood Vill., 39 Colo. App. 28, 563 P.2d 373 (1977).
The intent of a law which grants discretionary power to licensing officers, whether expressly or by necessary implication, is that the discretionary decision shall be the outcome of examination and consideration, in other words, that it shall constitute a discharge of official duty, and not a mere expression of personal will. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
Basis for capricious or arbitrary exercise of discretion. Capricious or arbitrary exercise of discretion by an administrative board can arise by failing to give candid and honest consideration of the evidence before it on which it is authorized to act in exercising its discretion, and by exercising its discretion in such manner after a consideration of the evidence before it as to clearly indicate that its action is based on conclusions from the evidence such that reasonable men fairly and honestly considering the evidence must reach contrary conclusions. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967); Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
"Neighborhood" doesn't include whole county. No authority justifies the conclusion that the "neighborhood" involved in an application for a liquor license can be expanded to include and entire county. Bolton v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 164 Colo. 112, 432 P.2d 761 (1967).
Boundary lines of a city do not exclude residents on one side or the other from the "neighborhood" to be considered in connection with applications for liquor licenses. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The existence or nonexistence of outlets on either side of a city boundary are to be considered by the licensing authority in determining whether reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are being met. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
"In or near" are spatial concepts; "in" means inside of, within the bounds or limits of, and "near" denotes close by, neighboring, or not far from. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
In noting the "nearness" of the other outlets the board must consider also their "availability", and "availability" contemplates suitableness for the accomplishment of a given purpose, capability of advantageous use or employment. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
The licensing authority can require compliance with a zoning law before permitting a store to open. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
Opportunity to comply with the zoning laws and restrictions would of necessity be granted to anyone desiring to open a lawful business. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
If the absence of adequate toilet facilities violated a county zoning resolution, it would not be ground in and of itself for denial of the application for a liquor license. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
The existence of "desire" for a new outlet is some evidence that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood were not being met. Anderson v. Spencer, 162 Colo. 328, 426 P.2d 970 (1967).
Consideration of size of outlet. In the absence of guidelines on the size of a proposed outlet in the statute and in the absence of a county zoning requirement for the location involved, a denial based on such grounds is not lawful. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
What findings must include. When a board considers "other pertinent matters" during the course of making its investigation, it must in its findings point out how it feels the applicant's qualifications to conduct the proposed business were affected by those matters. Wadlow v. Hartman, 191 Colo. 196, 551 P.2d 201 (1976).
Trial court had no jurisdiction. Where there was no showing in the trial court that protestants had exhausted their administrative remedies or that certiorari proceedings to review the decision of a local licensing authority to grant an application for a retail liquor store license were not moot, the trial court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the certiorari proceedings and should have dismissed the action. Larson v. City & County of Denver, 33 Colo. App. 153, 516 P.2d 448 (1973).
Specifications and inspection mandatory. Under subsection (4), the filing of plans and specifications is mandatory and may not be waived and prior to granting a liquor license the local authority must inspect the premises to determine that the applicant has complied with the architect's drawing and plans and specifications submitted upon the application. Norris v. Grimsley, 41 Colo. App. 231, 585 P.2d 925 (1978).
City council's denial of liquor license application was unsupported by competent evidence and was arbitrary where evidence presented by applicant established a prima facie case for issuance and the only rebuttal evidence was the existence of other liquor stores and a survey result that 26% percent expressed opposition. Brass Monkey v. Louisville City Council, 870 P.2d 636 (Colo. App. 1994).
Applied in Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
44-3-313. Restrictions for applications for new license.
-
An application for the issuance of any license specified in section 44-3-309 (1) or 44-4-107 (1) shall not be received or acted upon:
-
- If the application for a license described in section 44-3-309 (1) concerns a particular location that is the same as or within five hundred feet of a location for which, within the two years next preceding the date of the application, the state or a local licensing authority denied an application for the same class of license for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the adult inhabitants were satisfied by the existing outlets.
- Subsection (1)(a)(I) of this section shall not apply to cities in which limited gaming is permitted pursuant to section 9 of article XVIII of the state constitution.
- No licensing authority shall consider an application for any license to sell fermented malt beverages at retail pursuant to section 44-4-107 (1) if, within one year before the date of the application, the state or a local licensing authority has denied an application at the same location for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood or the desires of the inhabitants were satisfied by the existing outlets.
- Until it is established that the applicant is, or will be, entitled to possession of the premises for which application is made under a lease, rental agreement, or other arrangement for possession of the premises, or by virtue of ownership thereof;
- For a location in an area where the sale of alcohol beverages as contemplated is not permitted under the applicable zoning laws of the municipality, city and county, or county;
-
-
If the building in which the alcohol beverages are to be sold pursuant to a license described in section 44-3-309 (1) is located within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary; except that this subsection (1)(d)(I) does not:
- Affect the renewal or reissuance of a license once granted;
- Apply to licensed premises located or to be located on land owned by a municipality;
- Apply to an existing licensed premises on land owned by the state;
- Apply to a liquor license in effect and actively doing business before the principal campus was constructed;
- Apply to any club located within the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary that limits its membership to the faculty or staff of the institution; or
- Apply to a campus liquor complex.
- The distances referred to in subsection (1)(d)(I) of this section are to be computed by direct measurement from the nearest property line of the land used for school purposes to the nearest portion of the building in which liquor is to be sold, using a route of direct pedestrian access.
- The local licensing authority of any city and county, by rule or regulation; the governing body of any other municipality, by ordinance; and the governing body of any other county, by resolution, may eliminate or reduce the distance restrictions imposed by this subsection (1)(d) for any class of license, or may eliminate one or more types of schools or campuses from the application of any distance restriction established by or pursuant to this subsection (1)(d).
- In addition to the requirements of section 44-3-312 (2), the local licensing authority shall consider the evidence and make a specific finding of fact as to whether the building in which the liquor is to be sold is located within any distance restrictions established by or pursuant to this section. This finding shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to section 44-3-802.
-
If the building in which the alcohol beverages are to be sold pursuant to a license described in section 44-3-309 (1) is located within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary; except that this subsection (1)(d)(I) does not:
-
-
If the building in which the fermented malt beverages are to be sold pursuant to a license under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) is located within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary; except that this subsection (1)(e)(I) does not apply to:
- Licensed premises located or to be located on land owned by a municipality;
- An existing licensed premises on land owned by the state;
- A fermented malt beverage retailer that held a valid license and was actively doing business before the principal campus was constructed;
- A club located within the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary that limits its membership to the faculty or staff of the institution; or
- A campus liquor complex.
- The distances referred to in subsection (1)(e)(I) of this section are to be computed by direct measurement from the nearest property line of the land used for school purposes to the nearest portion of the building in which fermented malt beverages are to be sold, using a route of direct pedestrian access.
-
The local licensing authority of any city and county, by rule or regulation; the governing body of any other municipality, by ordinance; or the governing body of any other county, by resolution, may:
- Eliminate or modify the distance restrictions imposed by this subsection (1)(e); or
- Eliminate one or more types of schools or campuses from the application of any distance restriction established by or pursuant to this subsection (1)(e).
- In addition to the requirements of section 44-3-312 (2), the local licensing authority shall consider the evidence and make a specific finding of fact as to whether the building in which the fermented malt beverages are to be sold is located within any distance restriction established by or pursuant to this subsection (1)(e). The finding is subject to judicial review pursuant to section 44-3-802.
-
This subsection (1)(e) applies to:
- Applications for new fermented malt beverage retailer's licenses under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) submitted on or after June 4, 2018; and
- Applications submitted on or after June 4, 2018, under section 44-3-301 (9) by fermented malt beverage retailers licensed under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) to change the permanent location of the fermented malt beverage retailer's licensed premises.
-
If the building in which the fermented malt beverages are to be sold pursuant to a license under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) is located within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary; except that this subsection (1)(e)(I) does not apply to:
-
- An application for the issuance of a tavern or retail liquor store license may be denied under this article 3 if the local licensing authority or the state on state-owned property determines, pursuant to section 44-3-301 (2)(b), that the issuance of the license would result in or add to an undue concentration of the same class of license and, as a result, require the use of additional law enforcement resources.
Source: L. 2018: IP(1) amended and (1)(e) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2200, § 7, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 987, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-313 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsections IP(1) and (1)(e) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-313 IP(1) and (1)(e), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Previous denial based upon location prohibits application for transfer of license. The holder of a liquor license cannot apply for a transfer of his license to a facility where, during the preceding two years, a license has been denied for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants were being satisfied by existing outlets. Sixth Ave. Liquors, Inc. v. Kalbin, 44 Colo. App. 232, 615 P.2d 56 (1980).
Condition placed upon use review is impermissible attempt to regulate the hours in which alcohol beverages may be sold. The condition placed upon business does not amount to an exercise in zoning because it applies to a particular business only. Berger v. City of Boulder, 195 P.3d 1138 (Colo. App. 2008).
Land owned by the school board and used for the purpose of carrying out the physical education and athletic programs of the school is "land used for school purposes" for the purposes of this section. La Loma, Inc. v. City & County of Denver, 40 Colo. App. 55, 572 P.2d 1219 (1977).
The university of Colorado medical school is not a principal campus of the university of Colorado for the purposes of subsection (1)(d). Londer v. Friednash, 38 Colo. App. 350, 560 P.2d 102 (1976).
The university of Colorado at Denver was established as a principal campus in the Denver area. However, the medical school, presently located elsewhere within Denver, was not and has not been declared to be a separate state institution with a constitutionally established principal campus, and its location remains entrusted to the discretion of the regents. Londer v. Friednash, 38 Colo. App. 350, 560 P.2d 102 (1976).
The John F. Kennedy child development center is not a public school for the purposes of subsection (1)(d). Londer v. Friednash, 38 Colo. App. 350, 560 P.2d 102 (1976).
There was no evidence in the record that the John F. Kennedy child development center, which is associated with the medical school of the university of Colorado and is not subject to open enrollment by the public, is a public school other than the fact of its voluntary participation in a cooperative preschool program. Londer v. Friednash, 38 Colo. App. 350, 560 P.2d 102 (1976).
Meaning of subsection (1)(d)(III). In view of the general rule of statutory construction that relative and qualifying words and phrases, where no contrary intention appears, will be construed to refer solely to the last antecedent with which they are closely connected, the last clause of subsection (1)(d)(III) modifies only "to the nearest portion of the building in which liquor is to be sold", and consequently, measurement should proceed from the point nearest a proposed liquor store on the property line of a school by direct pedestrian route rather than the nearest gateway. Moschetti v. Liquor Licensing Auth., 176 Colo. 281, 490 P.2d 299 (1971).
The measurement between the school and the restaurant of the liquor license applicant begins at the point on the school property line that is nearest to the restaurant for a pedestrian, even though another point on the property line may be closer to the restaurant as the crow flies. Mariscos Las Islitas, Inc. v. Gonzales, 122 P.3d 1082 (Colo. App. 2005).
A measurement following a path of "pedestrian access" which is artificially circuitous is not valid. Moschetti v. Liquor Licensing Auth., 176 Colo. 281, 490 P.2d 299 (1971).
Applied in In re Title Pertaining to Sale of Table Wine in Grocery Stores, 646 P.2d 916 (Colo. 1982).
PART 4 CLASSES OF LICENSES AND PERMITS
44-3-401. Classes of licenses and permits - rules.
-
For the purpose of regulating the manufacture, sale, and distribution of alcohol beverages, the state licensing authority in its discretion, upon application in the prescribed form made to it, may issue and grant to the applicant a license or permit from any of the following classes, subject to the provisions and restrictions provided by this article 3:
- Manufacturer's license;
- Limited winery license;
- Nonresident manufacturer's license;
- Importer's license;
- Malt liquor importer's license;
- Wholesaler's liquor license;
- Wholesaler's beer license;
- Retail liquor store license;
- Liquor-licensed drugstore license;
- Beer and wine license;
- Hotel and restaurant license;
- Tavern license;
- Brew pub license;
- Club license;
- Arts license;
- Racetrack license;
- Public transportation system license;
- Optional premises license;
- Retail gaming tavern license;
- Vintner's restaurant license;
- Wine packaging permit;
- Distillery pub license;
- Lodging and entertainment license;
- Manager's permit.
- If the federal alcohol and tobacco tax and trade bureau approves the purchase, sale, possession, or manufacturing of powdered alcohol in the United States, the state licensing authority shall adopt rules establishing a mechanism for regulating the manufacture, purchase, sale, possession, and use of powdered alcohol.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 988, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-401 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Separate classification for "hotel and restaurant" and "beer and wine" licenses. A license permitting hotels and restaurants to sell spirituous liquors in addition to beer and wine to their patrons is an entirely separate class of permit from a "beer and wine" license. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The need for separate classification is obvious in that an exclusively beer and wine license in a restaurant situation will serve a different clientele than that of a license which also provides for the service of spirituous liquors. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Provision for the separate classifications of hotel and restaurant license and beer and wine license was not an arbitrary or unreasonable act on the part of the general assembly. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license, if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Huerta v. Canjar, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Ordinance taxing different classes of liquor licenses imposed under city's taxing power. City ordinance, which levied varying occupation taxes upon holders of different classes of liquor licenses, but which taxed all licensees holding the same type of license the identical amount each year, was a revenue-raising measure imposed under the city's taxing power, and not a regulatory measure imposed under the state's police power. Springston v. City of Fort Collins, 184 Colo. 126, 518 P.2d 939 (1974).
Not discriminatory. City ordinance, which levied varying occupational taxes upon holders of different classes of liquor licenses, but which taxed all licensees holding the same type of license the identical amount each year, was not discriminatory. Springston v. City of Fort Collins, 184 Colo. 126, 518 P.2d 939 (1974).
Applied in Dept. of Rev. v. Rosenthal, 197 Colo. 506, 594 P.2d 580 (1979).
44-3-402. Manufacturer's license.
-
A manufacturer's license shall be issued by the state licensing authority to persons distilling, rectifying, or brewing within this state for the following purposes only:
- To produce, manufacture, or rectify malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors;
- To sell malt or vinous liquors of their own manufacture within this state. Brewers or winers licensed under this section may solicit business directly from licensed retail persons or consumers by procuring a wholesaler's license as provided in this article 3; except that any malt liquor sold at wholesale by a brewer that has procured a wholesaler's license shall be unloaded and placed in the physical possession of a licensed wholesaler at the wholesaler's licensed premises in this state and inventoried for purposes of tax collection prior to delivery to a retailer or consumer. Wholesalers of malt liquors receiving products to be held as required by this subsection (1)(b) shall be liable for the payment of any tax due on such products under section 44-3-503 (1)(a).
- To sell vinous or spirituous liquors of their own manufacture within the state to persons licensed by this article 3 without procuring a wholesaler's license;
- To sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in other states, the laws of which permit the sale of alcohol beverages;
- To sell for export to foreign countries, if such export for beverage or medicinal purposes is permitted by the laws of the United States; but Colorado distillers, rectifiers, winers, and brewers licensed under this section may sell their products distilled, rectified, or brewed in this state directly to licensed retail licensees by procuring a wholesaler's license.
-
- A winery licensed pursuant to this section may conduct tastings and sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture, as well as other vinous liquors manufactured by other Colorado wineries licensed pursuant to this section or section 44-3-403, on the licensed premises of the winery and at one other approved sales room location at no additional cost, whether included in the license at the time of the original license issuance or by supplemental application. If the licensed premises includes multiple noncontiguous locations, the winery may operate a sales room on only one of those noncontiguous locations. Any additional sales room operated on a noncontiguous location of the licensed premises must be approved in accordance with the process outlined in subsection (2)(c) of this section.
- A winery licensed pursuant to this section may serve and sell food, general merchandise, and nonalcohol beverages for consumer consumption on or off the licensed premises.
-
-
- Prior to operating a sales room location, a winery licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (2)(c)(II) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the licensed winery submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority, or, for purposes of an application to operate a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, within the time specified by the state licensing authority by rule. (c) (I) (A) Prior to operating a sales room location, a winery licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (2)(c)(II) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the licensed winery submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority, or, for purposes of an application to operate a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, within the time specified by the state licensing authority by rule.
- If the local licensing authority does not submit a response to the state licensing authority within the time specified in subsection (2)(c)(I)(A) of this section, the state licensing authority shall deem that the local licensing authority has determined that the proposed sales room will not impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances or that the applicant will sufficiently mitigate any impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority must consider the response from the local licensing authority, if any, and may deny the proposed sales room application if the local licensing authority determines that approval of the proposed sales room will impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances, which may be determined by the local licensing authority without requiring a public hearing, or that the applicant cannot sufficiently mitigate any potential impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority shall not grant approval of an additional sales room unless the applicant affirms to the state licensing authority that the applicant has complied with local zoning restrictions.
- A licensed winery that is operating a sales room as of August 5, 2015, or that is granted approval pursuant to this subsection (2)(c) to operate a sales room on or after August 5, 2015, shall notify the state licensing authority of all sales rooms it operates. The state licensing authority shall maintain a list of all licensed winery sales rooms in the state and make the list available on its website.
-
The local licensing authority may request that the state licensing authority take action in accordance with section 44-3-601 against a licensed winery approved to operate a sales room if the local licensing authority:
- Demonstrates to the state licensing authority that the licensee has engaged in an unlawful act as set forth in part 9 of this article 3; or
- Shows good cause as specified in section 44-3-103 (19)(a), (19)(b), or (19)(d).
- This subsection (2)(c) does not apply if the licensed winery does not sell and serve vinous liquors for consumption on the licensed premises or in an approved sales room.
-
-
- Any winery that has received a license pursuant to this section shall be authorized to manufacture vinous liquors upon an alternating proprietor licensed premises, as approved by the state licensing authority, but retail sales of vinous liquors shall not be conducted from an area licensed or defined as an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
- Any brewery that has received a license pursuant to this section shall be authorized to manufacture malt liquors upon an alternating proprietor licensed premises, as approved by the state licensing authority, but retail sales of malt liquors shall not be conducted from an area licensed or defined as an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
- Any winery or brewery that holds a wholesaler's license pursuant to section 44-3-407 may engage in the wholesale sale of alcohol beverages that the licensee manufactured at an alternating proprietor licensed premises from both its licensed premises and the alternating proprietor licensed premises where the alcohol beverages were manufactured.
- A winery that has received a license pursuant to this section may ship wine directly to personal consumers if the winery also has received a winery direct shipper's permit under section 44-3-104.
-
- It is unlawful for a manufacturer licensed under this article 3 or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with a licensed manufacturer to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- It is unlawful for any licensed manufacturer of vinous or spirituous liquors or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with such a licensed manufacturer to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any vinous or spirituous wholesale licensee; except that any such financial interest that occurred on or before July 1, 1969, shall be lawful.
- Each applicant for a license as a brewer shall enter into a written contract with each wholesaler with which the applicant intends to do business that designates the territory within which the product of the applicant is sold by the respective wholesaler. The contract shall be submitted to the state licensing authority with an application, and the applicant, if licensed, shall have a continuing duty to submit any subsequent revisions, amendments, or superseding contracts to the state licensing authority.
-
- A manufacturer of spirituous liquors licensed pursuant to this section may conduct tastings and sell to customers spirituous liquors of its own manufacture on its licensed premises and at one other approved sales room location at no additional cost. A sales room location may be included in the license at the time of the original license issuance or by supplemental application.
- A manufacturer of spirituous liquors licensed pursuant to this section may serve and sell food, general merchandise, and nonalcohol beverages for consumer consumption on or off the licensed premises.
-
-
- Prior to operating a sales room location, a manufacturer of spirituous liquors licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (7)(c)(II) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the licensee submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority, or, for purposes of an application to operate a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, within the time specified by the state licensing authority by rule. (c) (I) (A) Prior to operating a sales room location, a manufacturer of spirituous liquors licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (7)(c)(II) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the licensee submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority, or, for purposes of an application to operate a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, within the time specified by the state licensing authority by rule.
- If the local licensing authority does not submit a response to the state licensing authority within the time specified in subsection (7)(c)(I)(A) of this section, the state licensing authority shall deem that the local licensing authority has determined that the proposed sales room will not impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances or that the applicant will sufficiently mitigate any impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority must consider the response from the local licensing authority, if any, and may deny the proposed sales room application if the local licensing authority determines that approval of the proposed sales room will impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances, which may be determined by the local licensing authority without requiring a public hearing, or that the applicant cannot sufficiently mitigate any potential impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority shall not grant approval of an additional sales room unless the applicant affirms to the state licensing authority that the applicant has complied with local zoning restrictions.
- A licensed spirituous liquors manufacturer that is operating a sales room as of August 5, 2015, or that is granted approval pursuant to this subsection (7)(c) to operate a sales room on or after August 5, 2015, shall notify the state licensing authority of all sales rooms it operates. The state licensing authority shall maintain a list of all licensed spirituous liquor manufacturer sales rooms in the state and make the list available on its website.
-
The local licensing authority may request that the state licensing authority take action in accordance with section 44-3-601 against a licensed spirituous liquors manufacturer approved to operate a sales room if the local licensing authority:
- Demonstrates to the state licensing authority that the licensee has engaged in an unlawful act as set forth in part 9 of this article 3; or
- Shows good cause as specified in section 44-3-103 (19)(a), (19)(b), or (19)(d).
- This subsection (7)(c) does not apply if the licensed spirituous liquors manufacturer does not sell and serve its spirituous liquors for consumption on the licensed premises or in an approved sales room.
-
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 990, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (3)(c) and (5)(a) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 7, § 8, effective January 31. L. 2021: (2)(a) amended, (HB 21-1044), ch. 165, p. 927, § 3, effective September 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-402 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include a case decided under former provisions similar to this section.
A liquor license cannot be obtained except upon payment of fixed fees. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
License fees are required to be paid annually. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
44-3-403. Limited winery license - rules.
- A Colorado limited winery license shall be granted by the state licensing authority to an applicant that certifies that it will manufacture not more than one hundred thousand gallons, or the metric equivalent thereof, of vinous liquors within Colorado. Each limited winery licensee shall annually certify to the state licensing authority its compliance with this subsection (1) and shall be subject to revocation of its license for false certification.
-
A limited winery licensee is authorized:
- To manufacture vinous liquors upon its licensed premises and, in order to enhance the growth and viability of the Colorado wine industry, upon alternating proprietor licensed premises, as approved by the state licensing authority;
- To sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture within this state at wholesale, at retail, or to personal consumers, including, if the limited winery also has received a winery direct shipper's permit under section 44-3-104, sales to be delivered by common carrier or by the limited winery licensee to personal consumers in accordance with all requirements in section 44-3-104;
- To sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture in other states, the laws of which permit the sale of such wines and liquors;
- To sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture for export to foreign countries if such export is permitted by the laws of the United States;
-
-
- Except as provided in subsection (2)(e)(I)(B) of this section and subject to subsection (2)(e)(II) of this section, to conduct tastings and sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture, as well as vinous liquors manufactured by other Colorado wineries, on the licensed premises of the limited winery and up to five other approved sales room locations, whether included in the license at the time of the original license issuance or by supplemental application. If the licensed premises includes multiple noncontiguous locations, the licensee may operate a sales room on only one of those noncontiguous locations. Any additional sales room operated on a noncontiguous location of the licensed premises must be approved as one of the licensee's additional sales rooms allowed under this subsection (2)(e)(I)(A) in accordance with the process outlined in subsection (2)(e)(II) of this section. (e) (I) (A) Except as provided in subsection (2)(e)(I)(B) of this section and subject to subsection (2)(e)(II) of this section, to conduct tastings and sell vinous liquors of its own manufacture, as well as vinous liquors manufactured by other Colorado wineries, on the licensed premises of the limited winery and up to five other approved sales room locations, whether included in the license at the time of the original license issuance or by supplemental application. If the licensed premises includes multiple noncontiguous locations, the licensee may operate a sales room on only one of those noncontiguous locations. Any additional sales room operated on a noncontiguous location of the licensed premises must be approved as one of the licensee's additional sales rooms allowed under this subsection (2)(e)(I)(A) in accordance with the process outlined in subsection (2)(e)(II) of this section.
- A limited winery licensee shall not conduct retail sales from an area licensed or defined as an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
-
- Prior to operating a sales room location, a limited winery licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (2)(e)(II)(B) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the licensed limited winery submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority, or, for purposes of an application to operate a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, within the time specified by the state licensing authority by rule. If the local licensing authority does not submit a response to the state licensing authority within the time specified in this subsection (2)(e)(II)(A), the state licensing authority shall deem that the local licensing authority has determined that the proposed sales room will not impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances or that the applicant will sufficiently mitigate any impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority must consider the response from the local licensing authority, if any, and may deny the proposed sales room application if the local licensing authority determines that approval of the proposed sales room will impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances, which may be determined by the local licensing authority without requiring a public hearing, or that the applicant cannot sufficiently mitigate any potential impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority shall not grant approval of an additional sales room unless the applicant affirms to the state licensing authority that the limited winery applicant has complied with local zoning restrictions.
- A licensed limited winery that is operating a sales room as of August 5, 2015, or that is granted approval pursuant to this subsection (2)(e)(II) to operate a sales room on or after August 5, 2015, shall notify the state licensing authority of all sales rooms it operates. The state licensing authority shall maintain a list of all limited winery licensee sales rooms in the state and make the list available on its website.
- The local licensing authority may request that the state licensing authority take action in accordance with section 44-3-601 against a licensed limited winery approved to operate a sales room if the local licensing authority demonstrates to the state licensing authority that the licensee has engaged in an unlawful act as set forth in part 9 of this article 3 or shows good cause as specified in section 44-3-103 (19)(a), (19)(b), or (19)(d).
- This subsection (2)(e)(II) does not apply if the licensed limited winery does not sell and serve vinous liquors for consumption on the licensed premises or in an approved sales room.
-
- To serve and sell food, general merchandise, and nonalcohol beverages for consumption on the premises of any licensed premises or to be taken by the consumer.
- In order to encourage and maintain the integrity and authenticity of Colorado's viticultural identity, support the wine-grape and fruit growing industries in Colorado, and inform the consumer of the source of grapes and fruit used by Colorado limited wineries to produce vinous liquors, the liquor enforcement division shall, after consultation with the Colorado wine industry and other interested parties from the alcohol beverage industry, within one year after June 1, 2005, enact rules for the implementation, standardization, and enforcement of appellation labeling requirements that are consistent with, and, with respect to the origin of the grapes and other fruit used to manufacture the vinous liquor, more informative than currently required by federal wine labeling regulations set forth in 27 CFR 4, "Labeling and Advertising of Wine", and related regulations. Colorado's labeling regulations shall apply to a manufacturer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or a Colorado limited winery licensed under this section in the manufacture of the vinous liquor contained in the labeled bottle. Honey wine, including honey wine flavored with fruit, herbs, or spices, shall be exempt from the labeling requirements included in this section.
-
- A winery may affix the phrase "Colorado Grown" to bottles of wine described in section 44-3-103 (10).
- Effective July 1, 2006, it shall be unlawful for a Colorado winery to make any misleading statement on its product label regarding the origin of grapes, fruit, or other agricultural products used to make vinous liquor. This subsection (4)(b) shall not be construed to apply to the winery's name or address or to an appellation allowed under federal regulations.
- A person who has a financial interest in a limited winery license and relinquishes such license to apply for another license under this article 3 shall be prohibited from obtaining a limited winery license for three years from the date of issuance of such other license.
-
- It is unlawful for any limited winery licensee or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with a limited winery licensee to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3.
- It is unlawful for any limited winery licensee or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with a limited winery licensee to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any vinous or spirituous wholesale licensee.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 994, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2)(e)(I)(A) amended, (SB 19-241), ch. 390, p. 3479, § 62, effective August 2. L. 2021: (2)(e)(I)(A) amended, (HB 21-1044), ch. 165, p. 927, § 4, effective September 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-403 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-404. Festival permit - rules.
-
-
A person listed in subsection (9) of this section may file a festival permit application with the state licensing authority. The applicant must:
- Specify the licensed premises for the first of the festivals to be held;
- File the application at least ten business days before the festival is to be held; and
- Include a twenty-five dollar annual processing fee with the application filed with the state licensing authority.
-
- A local licensing authority may create a local permit for festivals; except that a limited winery licensee or winery licensee need not obtain a local permit to participate in or hold a festival. If a local licensing authority does not create a local permit under this subsection (1)(b), an applicant need not obtain a local permit under this subsection (1)(b) to conduct festivals.
- If a licensee is applying for both a festival permit and a special event liquor permit issued under article 5 of this title 44, the licensee need not apply for any local permit established in accordance with subsection (1)(b)(I) of this section.
- If a festival permittee notifies the state licensing authority and the appropriate local licensing authority of the location of and dates of each festival at least ten business days before holding the festival, the permittee may hold up to, but no more than, nine festivals during the twelve months after the festival permit is issued.
-
A person listed in subsection (9) of this section may file a festival permit application with the state licensing authority. The applicant must:
- The licensee that holds the festival must file the application for the permit, but other licensees may jointly participate under the permit issued to the licensee that applied for the permit.
- Notification of all subsequent festivals shall be by supplemental application, as approved by the state licensing authority.
-
The state licensing authority may deny a festival permit or supplemental application for any of the following reasons:
- A documented history of violations of this article 3 or rules issued under this article 3 by any participating licensee;
- The filing of an incomplete or late application; or
- A finding that the application, if granted, would result in violations of this article 3 or rules issued under this article 3 or violations of the laws of a local government.
- After the issuance of an initial festival permit, all supplemental applications that are complete and filed in a timely manner are deemed approved unless the state licensing authority provides the permittee with a notice of denial at least seventy-two hours prior to the date of the event.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, the permittee and participating licensees are authorized to use the licensed premises jointly to conduct alcohol beverage tastings and to engage in the same retail sales of alcohol beverages that the permittee and participating licensees are authorized to conduct at their licensed premises. A festival permit does not authorize the permittee to use the licensed premises for more than seventy-two hours for any one festival.
- If a violation of this article 3 occurs during a festival and the licensee responsible for the violation can be identified, the state or local licensing authority may charge and impose appropriate penalties on the licensee. If the responsible party cannot be identified, the state licensing authority may send a written notice to every licensee identified on the permit application and may fine each the same dollar amount, which fine must not exceed twenty-five dollars per licensee or two hundred dollars in the aggregate. A joint fine levied pursuant to this subsection (7) does not apply to the revocation of the licensee's license under section 44-3-601.
- A joint fine levied pursuant to subsection (7) of this section shall not create or increase civil liability under section 44-3-801 (3) for a participating licensee or create joint liability for such a licensee.
- This section applies to a person licensed under section 44-3-402, 44-3-403, 44-3-407, 44-3-411, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-417, 44-3-422, or 44-3-426.
- The state licensing authority may adopt rules necessary to implement and administer this section.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 996, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2021: (1), (2), IP(4), (5), (6), and (7) amended and (9) and (10) added, (SB 21-082), ch. 195, p. 1044, § 2, effective September 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-403.5 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-405. Importer's license.
-
-
An importer's license shall be issued to persons importing vinous or spirituous liquors into this state for the following purposes only:
- To import and sell such liquors to wholesale liquor licensees;
- To solicit orders from retail licensees and fill such orders through wholesale liquor licensees.
- Such license shall not permit the licensee to maintain stocks of alcohol beverages in this state.
-
An importer's license shall be issued to persons importing vinous or spirituous liquors into this state for the following purposes only:
- It is unlawful for any licensed importer of vinous or spirituous liquors or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with such a licensed importer to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any vinous or spirituous wholesale licensee; except that any such financial interest that occurred on or before July 1, 1969, shall be lawful.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 997, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-404 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-406. Nonresident manufacturers and importers of malt liquor.
- A nonresident manufacturer's license shall be issued to persons brewing malt liquor outside the state of Colorado for the purposes listed in subsection (3) of this section.
- A malt liquor importer's license shall be issued to persons importing malt liquor into this state for the purposes listed in subsection (3) of this section.
-
The licenses referred to in subsections (1) and (2) of this section shall be issued for the following purposes only:
- To import and sell malt liquors within the state of Colorado to persons licensed as wholesalers pursuant to this article 3;
- To maintain stocks of malt liquors and to operate malt liquor warehouses by procuring a malt liquor wholesaler's license for each such operation as provided in this article 3;
- To solicit orders from retail licensees licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and fill the orders through malt liquor wholesalers.
- Any person holding a nonresident manufacturer's license or a malt liquor importer's license shall also be eligible to obtain a vinous and spirituous liquor importer's license pursuant to section 44-3-405; except that each such license obtained shall be separate and distinct.
- Each manufacturer, nonresident manufacturer, and malt liquor importer shall enter into a written contract with each wholesaler with which the manufacturer, nonresident manufacturer, and malt liquor importer intends to do business that designates the territory within which the product of the manufacturer, nonresident manufacturer, and malt liquor importer is sold by the respective wholesaler. A manufacturer, nonresident manufacturer, and malt liquor importer shall not contract with more than one wholesaler to sell their products within the same territory. The contract shall be submitted to the state licensing authority with any application and the applicant, if licensed, shall have a continuing duty to submit any subsequent revisions, amendments, or superseding contracts to the state licensing authority.
- It is unlawful for a nonresident manufacturer licensed under this article 3, or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with the licensee, to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 998, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (3)(c) and (6) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 7, § 9, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-405 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-407. Wholesaler's license - discrimination in wholesale sales prohibited.
-
-
A wholesaler's liquor license shall be issued to persons selling vinous or spirituous liquors at wholesale for the following purposes only:
- To maintain and operate one or more warehouses in this state to handle vinous or spirituous liquors;
- To take orders for vinous and spirituous liquors at any place and deliver vinous and spirituous liquors on orders previously taken to any place if the licensee has procured a wholesaler's liquor license and the place where orders are taken and delivered is a place regularly licensed pursuant to the provisions of this article 3;
- To package vinous and spirituous liquors that a licensed importer has legally transported into Colorado or that a licensed manufacturer has legally produced in Colorado.
-
-
A wholesaler's beer license shall be issued to persons that sell malt liquors at wholesale to retailers licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and that designate to the state licensing authority on their application the territory within which the licensee may sell the designated products of any brewer as agreed upon by the licensee and the brewer of the products for the following purposes only:
- To maintain and operate warehouses and one sales room in this state to handle malt liquors to be denominated a wholesale beer store;
- To take orders for malt liquors at any place within the territory designated on the license application and deliver malt liquors on orders previously taken to any place within the designated geographical territory, if the licensee has procured a wholesaler's beer license and the place where orders are taken and delivered is a place regularly licensed to sell at retail for consumption on or off the licensed premises pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
- Prior to operating a sales room as authorized by this subsection (1)(b), a wholesaler's beer licensee that is licensed pursuant to this section shall, at the time of application to the state licensing authority, send a copy of the application or supplemental application for a sales room to the local licensing authority in the jurisdiction in which the sales room is proposed. The local licensing authority may submit a response to the application, including its determination specified in subsection (1)(b)(II)(B) of this section, to the state licensing authority but must submit its response within forty-five days after the wholesaler's beer licensee submits its sales room application to the state licensing authority. If the local licensing authority does not submit a response to the state licensing authority within forty-five days after submission of the sales room application, the state licensing authority shall deem that the local licensing authority has determined that the proposed sales room will not impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances or that the applicant will sufficiently mitigate any impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- The state licensing authority must consider the response from the local licensing authority, if any, and may deny the proposed sales room application if the local licensing authority determines that approval of the proposed sales room will impact traffic, noise, or other neighborhood concerns in a manner that is inconsistent with local regulations or ordinances, which may be determined by the local licensing authority without requiring a public hearing, or that the applicant cannot sufficiently mitigate any potential impacts identified by the local licensing authority.
- A wholesaler's beer licensee that is operating a sales room as of August 5, 2015, or that is granted approval pursuant to this subsection (1)(b)(II) to operate a sales room on or after August 5, 2015, shall notify the state licensing authority of its sales room. The state licensing authority shall maintain a list of all wholesaler's beer licensee sales rooms in the state and make the list available on its website.
- The local licensing authority may request that the state licensing authority take action in accordance with section 44-3-601 against a wholesaler's beer licensee approved to operate a sales room if the local licensing authority demonstrates to the state licensing authority that the licensee has engaged in an unlawful act as set forth in part 9 of this article 3 or shows good cause as specified in section 44-3-103 (19)(a), (19)(b), or (19)(d).
- This subsection (1)(b)(II) does not apply if the wholesaler's beer licensee does not sell and serve malt liquors for consumption on the licensed premises.
-
A wholesaler's beer license shall be issued to persons that sell malt liquors at wholesale to retailers licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and that designate to the state licensing authority on their application the territory within which the licensee may sell the designated products of any brewer as agreed upon by the licensee and the brewer of the products for the following purposes only:
- Each license shall be separate and distinct, but any person may secure both licenses upon the payment in advance of both fees provided in this article 3.
- All malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors purchased by any licensee under this section, and all malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors shipped into this state by or to any such licensee, shall be placed in the physical possession of the licensee at the licensee's warehouse facilities prior to delivery to persons holding licenses pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
- A brewer or importer licensed pursuant to this article 3 shall not sell malt liquors to a wholesaler without having a written contract with the wholesaler that designates the specific products of such brewer or importer to be sold by the wholesaler and that establishes the territory within which the wholesaler may sell the designated products.
- A brewer or importer shall not contract with more than one wholesaler to sell the products of such brewer or importer within the same territory.
- Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, a wholesaler licensed pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section may establish a program for its employees to purchase directly from the wholesaler vinous or spirituous liquors sold by that wholesaler.
-
A wholesaler's liquor license shall be issued to persons selling vinous or spirituous liquors at wholesale for the following purposes only:
- It is unlawful for any licensed wholesaler or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with a licensed wholesaler to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- It is unlawful for a licensed wholesaler of vinous or spirituous liquors or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested financially in or with such a wholesaler to be interested financially in the business of any licensed manufacturer or importer of vinous or spirituous liquors; except that any such financial interest that occurred on or before July 1, 1969, shall be lawful.
-
- A wholesaler shall make available to all retailers licensed pursuant to this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 in this state without discrimination all malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors offered by the wholesaler for sale at wholesale. A wholesaler shall use its best efforts to make available to licensed retailers each brand of alcohol beverage that the wholesaler has been authorized to distribute.
- Nothing in this section prohibits a wholesaler from establishing reasonable allocation procedures when the anticipated demand for a product is greater than the supply of the product.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 999, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: IP(1)(b)(I), (1)(b)(I)(B), (1)(d), (2), and (4)(a) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 8, § 10, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-406 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
The purchase of beer at retail stores for resale outside Colorado does not require a beer wholesaler's license, since that activity is not covered by this section. People v. Kagan, 195 Colo. 76, 575 P.2d 416 (1978).
Section as basis for defense to antitrust action. See Adolph Coors Co. v. A & S Whsles., Inc., 561 F.2d 807 (10th Cir. 1977).
Applied in Nobel, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 652 P.2d 1084 (Colo. App. 1982).
44-3-408. Termination of wholesalers - remedies - definitions.
-
-
Except as provided in subsections (2) to (4) of this section, no supplier shall terminate an agreement with a wholesaler unless all of the following occur:
- The wholesaler fails to comply with a provision of a written agreement between the wholesaler and the supplier;
- The wholesaler receives written notification by certified mail, return receipt requested, from the supplier of the alleged noncompliance and is afforded no less than sixty days in which to cure such noncompliance;
- The wholesaler fails to cure such noncompliance within the allotted sixty-day cure period; and
- The supplier provides written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the wholesaler of such continued failure to comply with the agreement. The notification shall contain a statement of the intention of the supplier to terminate or not renew the agreement, the reasons for termination or nonrenewal, and the date the termination or nonrenewal shall take effect.
- If a wholesaler cures an alleged noncompliance within the cure period provided in subsection (1)(a)(II) of this section, any notice of termination from a supplier to a wholesaler shall be null and void.
-
Except as provided in subsections (2) to (4) of this section, no supplier shall terminate an agreement with a wholesaler unless all of the following occur:
-
A supplier may immediately terminate an agreement with a wholesaler, effective upon furnishing written notification to the wholesaler by certified mail, return receipt requested, for any of the following reasons:
- The wholesaler's failure to pay any account when due and upon written demand by the supplier for payment, in accordance with agreed payment terms;
- The assignment or attempted assignment by the wholesaler for the benefit of creditors, the institution of proceedings in bankruptcy by or against the wholesaler, the dissolution or liquidation of the wholesaler, or the insolvency of the wholesaler;
- The revocation or suspension of, or the failure to renew for a period of more than fourteen days, a state, local, or federal license or permit to sell products in this state;
- Failure of an owner of a wholesaler to sell his or her ownership interest in the distribution rights to the supplier's products within one hundred twenty days after the owner of a wholesaler has been convicted of a felony that, in the supplier's sole judgment, adversely affects the goodwill of the wholesaler or supplier;
- A wholesaler has been convicted of, found guilty of, or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to, a charge of violating a law or regulation of the United States or of this state if it materially and adversely affects the ability of the wholesaler or supplier to continue to sell its products in this state;
- Any attempted transfer of ownership of the wholesaler, stock of the wholesaler, or stock of any parent corporation of the wholesaler, or any change in the beneficial ownership or control of any entity, without obtaining the prior written approval of the supplier, except as may otherwise be permitted pursuant to a written agreement between the parties;
- Fraudulent conduct in the wholesaler's dealings with the supplier or its products, including the intentional sale of products outside the supplier's established quality standards;
- The wholesaler ceases to conduct business for five consecutive business days, unless such cessation is the result of an act of God, war, or a condition of national, state, or local emergency; or
- Any sale of products, directly or indirectly, to customers located outside the territory assigned to the wholesaler by the supplier. This subsection (2)(i) shall not prohibit wholesalers from making sales to licensed retailers who buy off the wholesaler's dock, so long as the retailer's licensed location is within the wholesaler's assigned territory.
- The supplier shall have the right to terminate an agreement with a wholesaler at any time by giving the wholesaler at least ninety days' written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, with copies by first-class mail to all other wholesalers in all other states who have entered into the same distribution agreement with the supplier.
-
If a particular brand of products is transferred by purchase or otherwise from a supplier to a successor supplier, the following shall occur:
- The successor supplier shall notify the existing wholesaler of the successor supplier's intent not to appoint the existing wholesaler for all or part of the existing wholesaler's territory for the product. The successor supplier shall mail the notice of termination by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the existing wholesaler. The successor supplier shall include in the notice the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the successor wholesalers.
-
- The successor wholesaler shall negotiate with the existing wholesaler to determine the fair market value of the existing wholesaler's right to distribute the product in the existing wholesaler's territory immediately before the successor supplier acquired rights to the particular brand of products. The successor wholesaler and the existing wholesaler shall negotiate the fair market value in good faith.
- The existing wholesaler shall continue to distribute the product until payment of the compensation agreed to under subsection (4)(b)(I) of this section, or awarded under subsection (4)(c) of this section, is received.
-
- If the successor wholesaler and the existing wholesaler fail to reach a written agreement on the fair market value within thirty days after the existing wholesaler receives the notice required pursuant to subsection (4)(a) of this section, the successor wholesaler or the existing wholesaler shall send a written notice to the other party requesting arbitration pursuant to the uniform arbitration act, part 2 of article 22 of title 13. Arbitration shall be held for the purpose of determining the fair market value of the existing wholesaler's right to distribute the product in the existing wholesaler's territory immediately before the successor supplier acquired rights to the particular brand of products.
- Notice of intent to arbitrate shall be sent, as provided in subsection (4)(c)(I) of this section, not later than thirty-five days after the existing wholesaler receives the notice required pursuant to subsection (4)(a) of this section. The arbitration proceeding shall conclude not later than forty-five days after the date the notice of intent to arbitrate is mailed to a party.
-
Any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4) shall be conducted in a city within this state that:
- Is closest to the existing wholesaler; and
- Has a population of more than twenty thousand.
- Any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) shall be conducted before one impartial arbitrator, to be selected by the American arbitration association or its successor. The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures of the uniform arbitration act, part 2 of article 22 of title 13.
- An arbitrator's award in any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) shall be monetary only and shall not enjoin or compel conduct. Any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) shall be in lieu of all other remedies and procedures.
- The cost of the arbitrator and any other direct costs of an arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) shall be equally divided by the parties engaged in the arbitration. All other costs shall be paid by the party incurring them.
- The arbitrator in any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) shall render a written decision not later than thirty days after the conclusion of the arbitration, unless this time is extended by mutual agreement of the parties and the arbitrator. The decision of the arbitrator is final and binding on the parties. The arbitrator's award may be enforced by commencing a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. Under no circumstances may the parties appeal the decision of the arbitrator.
- An existing wholesaler or successor wholesaler who fails to participate in the arbitration hearings in any arbitration held pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) waives all rights the existing wholesaler or successor wholesaler would have had in the arbitration and is considered to have consented to the determination of the arbitrator.
-
If the existing wholesaler does not receive payment from the successor wholesaler of the settlement or arbitration award required under subsection (4)(b) or (4)(c) of this section within thirty days after the date of the settlement or arbitration award:
- The existing wholesaler shall remain the wholesaler of the product in the existing wholesaler's territory to at least the same extent that the existing wholesaler distributed the product immediately before the successor wholesaler acquired rights to the product; and
- The existing wholesaler is not entitled to the settlement or arbitration award.
-
- Any wholesaler or supplier who is aggrieved by a violation of any provision of subsections (1) and (3) of this section shall be entitled to recovery of damages caused by the violation. Except for a dispute arising under subsection (4) of this section, damages shall be sought in a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction.
- Any dispute arising under subsections (1) and (3) of this section may also be settled by such dispute resolution procedures as may be provided by a written agreement between the parties.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or prohibit good-faith settlements voluntarily entered into by the parties.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to give an existing wholesaler or a successor wholesaler any right to compensation if an agreement with the existing wholesaler or successor wholesaler is terminated by a successor supplier pursuant to subsections (1) to (3) of this section.
- Nothing in this section shall apply to a manufacturer that produces less than three hundred thousand gallons of malt beverages per calendar year.
-
As used in this section:
- "Existing wholesaler" means a wholesaler who distributes a particular brand of products at the time a successor supplier acquires rights to manufacture or import the particular brand of products.
- "Fair market value" means the value that would be determined in a transaction entered into without duress or threat of termination of the existing wholesaler's right and shall include all elements of value, including goodwill and going-concern value.
- "Products" means malt liquors.
- "Successor supplier" means a primary source of supply, a brewer, or an importer that acquires rights to a product from a predecessor supplier.
- "Successor wholesaler" means one or more wholesalers designated by a successor supplier to replace the existing wholesaler, for all or part of the existing wholesaler's territory, in the distribution of the existing product or products.
- "Supplier" means any person, partnership, corporation, association, or other business enterprise that is engaged in the manufacturing or importing of products.
- "Wholesaler" means the holder of a Colorado wholesaler's beer license.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1001, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (9)(c) and (9)(g) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 8, § 11, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-406.3 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-409. Retail liquor store license - rules.
-
-
- A retail liquor store license shall be issued to persons selling only malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. Malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers shall not be sold at retail other than in retail liquor stores except as provided in section 44-3-410 or except as allowed under this article 3. (1) (a) (I) A retail liquor store license shall be issued to persons selling only malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. Malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers shall not be sold at retail other than in retail liquor stores except as provided in section 44-3-410 or except as allowed under this article 3.
-
On and after July 1, 2016, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new retail liquor store license if the premises for which the retail liquor store license is sought is located:
- Within one thousand five hundred feet of another retail liquor store licensed under this section or a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410;
- For a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of another retail liquor store licensed under this section or a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410; or
- For a premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer that is contiguous to the city and county of Denver, within one thousand five hundred feet of another retail liquor store licensed under this section or a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410.
-
In addition, retail liquor stores may sell any nonalcohol products, but only if the annual gross revenues from the sale of nonalcohol products do not exceed twenty percent of the retail liquor store's total annual gross sales revenues. For purposes of calculating the annual gross revenues from the sale of nonalcohol products, sales revenues from the following products are excluded:
- Lottery products;
- Cigarettes, tobacco products, and nicotine products, as defined in section 18-13-121 (5);
- Ice, soft drinks, and mixers; and
- Nonfood items related to the consumption of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors.
-
Nothing in this section or in section 44-3-103 (48) prohibits a licensed retail liquor store from:
- Selling items on behalf of or to benefit a charitable organization, as defined in section 39-26-102, or a nonprofit corporation subject to the "Colorado Revised Nonprofit Corporation Act", articles 121 to 137 of title 7, and determined to be exempt from federal income tax by the federal internal revenue service, if the retail liquor store does not receive compensation for the sale;
- At the option of the licensee, displaying promotional material furnished by a manufacturer or wholesaler, which material permits a customer to purchase other items from a third person, so long as the retail liquor store licensee does not receive payment from the third person and the customer orders the additional merchandise directly from the third person; or
- Allowing tastings to be conducted on the licensed premises if the licensee has received authorization to conduct tastings pursuant to section 44-3-301.
-
-
-
A person licensed under this section to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in a retail liquor store:
(I) Shall purchase the malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; and
(II) (A) Shall not sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors to consumers at a price that is below the retail liquor store's cost, as listed on the invoice, to purchase the malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors, unless the sale is of discontinued or close-out malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors.
(B) This subsection (2)(a)(II) does not prohibit a retail liquor store from operating a bona fide loyalty or rewards program for malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors so long as the price for the product is not below the retail liquor store's costs as listed on the invoice. The state licensing authority may adopt rules to implement this subsection (2)(a)(II).
- A person licensed under this section that obtains additional retail liquor store licenses in accordance with subsection (4)(b)(III) of this section may operate under a single or consolidated corporate entity but shall not commingle purchases of or credit extensions for purchases of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a wholesaler licensed under this article 3 for more than one licensed premises. A wholesaler licensed under this article 3 shall not base the price for the malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors it sells to a retail liquor store licensed under this section on the total volume of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors that the licensee purchases for multiple licensed premises.
-
A person licensed under this section to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in a retail liquor store:
-
-
A person licensed to sell at retail who complies with this subsection (3) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3) may deliver malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors to a person of legal age if:
- The person receiving the delivery of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors is located at a place that is not licensed pursuant to this section;
- The delivery is made by an employee of the licensed retail liquor store who is at least twenty-one years of age and who is using a vehicle owned or leased by the licensee to make the delivery;
- The person making the delivery verifies, in accordance with section 44-3-901 (11), that the person receiving the delivery of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors is at least twenty-one years of age; and
- The retail liquor store derives no more than fifty percent of its gross annual revenues from total sales of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from the sale of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors that the retail liquor store delivers.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules as necessary for the proper delivery of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors and is authorized to issue a permit to any person who is licensed under this section to sell at retail and delivers the liquors pursuant to this subsection (3). A permit issued under this subsection (3) is subject to the same suspension and revocation provisions as are set forth in section 44-3-601 for other licenses granted pursuant to this article 3.
-
A person licensed to sell at retail who complies with this subsection (3) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3) may deliver malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors to a person of legal age if:
-
- Except as provided in subsection (4)(b) of this section, it is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a retail liquor store to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3.
-
An owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a retail liquor store may have an interest in:
- An arts license granted under this article 3;
- An airline public transportation system license granted under this article 3;
-
For a retail liquor store licensed on or before January 1, 2016, and whose license holder is a Colorado resident, additional retail liquor store licenses as follows, but only if the premises for which a license is sought satisfies the distance requirements specified in subsection (1)(a)(II) of this section:
- On or after January 1, 2017, and before January 1, 2022, one additional retail liquor store license, for a maximum of up to two total retail liquor store licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2027, up to two additional retail liquor store licenses, for a maximum of three total retail liquor store licenses; and
- On or after January 1, 2027, up to three additional retail liquor store licenses, for a maximum of four total retail liquor store licenses; or
- A financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
- A liquor-licensed drugstore may apply to the state and local licensing authorities, as part of a single application, for a merger and conversion of retail liquor store licenses to a single liquor-licensed drugstore license as provided in section 44-3-410 (1)(b).
Source: L. 2018: (1)(a)(I) amended, (SB 18-067), ch. 4, p. 31, § 2, effective March 1; (1)(a)(II) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2201, § 8, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1005, § 2, effective October 1; (2) and (3) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2201, § 8, effective January 1, 2019.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-407 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsection (1)(a)(I) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-407 (1)(a)(I) in SB 18-067. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (1)(a)(II) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-407 (1)(a)(II) in SB 18-243. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsections (2) and (3) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-407 (2) and (3), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective January 1, 2019.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "The C olorado Liquor C ode: Distinct and Definite Requirements", see 17 Colo. Law. 841 (1988).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
The state has decided that the sale of liquor should be regulated rather than prohibited. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
In the regulatory scheme, limited discretion has been delegated to the board to determine the neighborhood requirements and the inhabitants' desires on the basis of competent facts relevant to each application. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Johnson, 170 Colo. 259, 460 P.2d 770 (1969).
Applied in In re Title Pertaining to Sale of Table Wine in Grocery Stores, 646 P.2d 916 (Colo. 1982).
44-3-410. Liquor-licensed drugstore license - multiple licenses permitted - requirements - rules.
-
-
-
A liquor-licensed drugstore license shall be issued to persons selling malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. On and after July 1, 2016, except as permitted under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new liquor-licensed drugstore license if the licensed premises for which a liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought is located:
(1) (a) (I) A liquor-licensed drugstore license shall be issued to persons selling malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. On and after July 1, 2016, except as permitted under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new liquor-licensed drugstore license if the licensed premises for which a liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought is located:
- Within one thousand five hundred feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409;
- For a drugstore premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409; or
- For a drugstore premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer that is contiguous to the city and county of Denver, within one thousand five hundred feet of a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409.
-
Nothing in this subsection (1) prohibits:
- The renewal or transfer of ownership of a liquor-licensed drugstore license initially issued prior to July 1, 2016.
- A liquor-licensed drugstore licensee from allowing tastings on the licensed premises if the applicable local licensing authority has authorized the liquor-licensed drugstore to conduct tastings on its licensed premises in accordance with section 44-3-301 (10).
-
A liquor-licensed drugstore license shall be issued to persons selling malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. On and after July 1, 2016, except as permitted under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new liquor-licensed drugstore license if the licensed premises for which a liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought is located:
(1) (a) (I) A liquor-licensed drugstore license shall be issued to persons selling malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors in sealed containers not to be consumed at the place where sold. On and after July 1, 2016, except as permitted under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the state and local licensing authorities shall not issue a new liquor-licensed drugstore license if the licensed premises for which a liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought is located:
-
- On or after January 1, 2017, to qualify for an additional liquor-licensed drugstore license under this section, a liquor-licensed drugstore licensee, or a retail liquor store licensee that was licensed as a liquor-licensed drugstore on February 21, 2016, must apply to the state and local licensing authorities, as part of a single application, for a transfer of ownership of at least two licensed retail liquor stores that were licensed or had applied for a license on or before May 1, 2016, a change of location of one of the retail liquor stores, and a merger and conversion of the retail liquor store licenses into a single liquor-licensed drugstore license. The applicant may apply for a transfer, change of location, and merger and conversion only if all of the following requirements are met:
- For purposes of determining whether the distance requirements specified in subsection (1)(b)(I) of this section are satisfied, the distance shall be determined by a radius measurement that begins at the principal doorway of the drugstore premises for which the application is made and ends at the principal doorway of the licensed retail liquor store.
- In making its determination on the transfer of ownership, change of location, and license merger and conversion application, the local licensing authority shall consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the adult inhabitants in accordance with section 44-3-312.
-
In addition to any other requirements for licensure under this section or this article 3, a person applying for a new liquor-licensed drugstore license in accordance with this subsection (1)(b) on or after January 1, 2017, or to renew a liquor-licensed drugstore license issued on or after January 1, 2017, under this subsection (1)(b) must:
- Provide evidence to the state and local licensing authorities that at least twenty percent of the licensee's gross annual income derived from total sales during the prior twelve months at the drugstore premises for which a new or renewal licenses is sought is from the sale of food items, as defined by the state licensing authority by rule; and
- Make and keep its premises open to the public.
- Not sell clothing or accessories imprinted with advertising, logos, slogans, trademarks, or messages related to alcohol beverages.
(A) The retail liquor stores that are the subject of the transfer of ownership are located within the same local licensing authority jurisdiction as the drugstore premises for which the applicant is seeking a liquor-licensed drugstore license, and, if any retail liquor stores are located within one thousand five hundred feet of the drugstore premises or, for a drugstore premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, within three thousand feet of the drugstore premises, the applicant applies to transfer ownership of all retail liquor stores located within that distance. If there are no licensed retail liquor stores or only one licensed retail liquor store within the same local licensing authority jurisdiction as the drugstore premises for which a liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought, the applicant shall apply to transfer ownership of one or two retail liquor stores, as necessary, that are located in the local licensing authority jurisdiction that is nearest to the jurisdiction in which the drugstore premises is located.
(B) Upon transfer and conversion of the retail liquor store licenses to a single liquor-licensed drugstore license, the drugstore premises for which the liquor-licensed drugstore license is sought will be located at least one thousand five hundred feet from all licensed retail liquor stores that are within the same local licensing authority jurisdiction as the drugstore premises or, for a drugstore premises located in a municipality with a population of ten thousand or fewer, at least three thousand feet from all licensed retail liquor stores that are within the same local licensing authority jurisdiction as the drugstore premises.
-
-
-
A person licensed under this section to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors as provided in this section shall:
(I) Purchase malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors only from a wholesaler licensed under this article 3;
(II) (A) Not sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors to consumers at a price that is below the liquor-licensed drugstore's cost, as listed on the invoice, to purchase the malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors, unless the sale is of discontinued or close-out malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors.
(B) This subsection (2)(a)(II) does not prohibit a liquor-licensed drugstore from operating a bona fide loyalty or rewards program for malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors so long as the price for the product is not below the liquor-licensed drugstore's costs as listed on the invoice. The state licensing authority may adopt rules to implement this subsection (2)(a)(II).
(III) Not allow consumers to purchase malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors at a self-checkout or other mechanism that allows the consumer to complete the alcohol beverage purchase without assistance from and completion of the entire transaction by an employee of the liquor-licensed drugstore;
(IV) Require, in accordance with section 44-3-901 (11), consumers attempting to purchase malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors to present a valid identification, as determined by the state licensing authority by rule; and
- A person licensed under this section on or after January 1, 2017, shall not purchase malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a wholesaler on credit and shall effect payment upon delivery of the alcohol beverages.
-
A person licensed under this section to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors as provided in this section shall:
-
-
A liquor-licensed drugstore licensee who complies with this subsection (3) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3) may deliver malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors to a person of legal age if:
- The person receiving the delivery of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors is located at a place that is not licensed pursuant to this section;
- The delivery is made by an employee of the liquor-licensed drugstore who is at least twenty-one years of age and who is using a vehicle owned or leased by the licensee to make the delivery;
- The person making the delivery verifies, in accordance with section 44-3-901 (11), that the person receiving the delivery of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors is at least twenty-one years of age; and
- The liquor-licensed drugstore derives no more than fifty percent of its gross annual revenues from total sales of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from the sale of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors that the liquor-licensed drugstore delivers.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules as necessary for the proper delivery of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors and is authorized to issue a permit to any liquor-licensed drugstore licensee that will allow the licensee to deliver the liquors pursuant to the rules and this subsection (3). A permit issued under this subsection (3) is subject to the same suspension and revocation provisions as are set forth in sections 44-3-306 and 44-3-601 for other licenses granted pursuant to this article 3.
-
A liquor-licensed drugstore licensee who complies with this subsection (3) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3) may deliver malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors to a person of legal age if:
-
- Except as provided in subsection (4)(b) of this section, it is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a liquor-licensed drugstore to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3.
-
An owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a liquor-licensed drugstore may have an interest in:
- An arts license granted under this article 3;
- An airline public transportation system license granted under this article 3;
- A financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4);
-
For a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed on or before January 1, 2016, or a liquor-licensed drugstore licensee that was licensed as a liquor-licensed drugstore on February 21, 2016, that converted its license to a retail liquor store license after February 21, 2016, and that applied on or before May 1, 2017, to convert its retail liquor store license back to a liquor-licensed drugstore license, additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses as follows, but only if obtained in accordance with subsection (1)(b) of this section:
- On or after January 1, 2017, and before January 1, 2022, four additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of five total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2027, up to seven additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of eight total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, up to twelve additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of thirteen total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2032, and before January 1, 2037, up to nineteen additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of twenty total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses; and
- On or after January 1, 2037, an unlimited number of additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses.
-
For a liquor-licensed drugstore that submitted an application for a new liquor-licensed drugstore license before October 1, 2016, additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses as follows, but only if obtained in accordance with subsection (1)(b) of this section:
- On or after January 1, 2019, and before January 1, 2022, four additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of five total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2027, up to seven additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of eight total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, up to twelve additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of thirteen total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses;
- On or after January 1, 2032, and before January 1, 2037, up to nineteen additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses, for a maximum of twenty total liquor-licensed drugstore licenses; and
- On or after January 1, 2037, an unlimited number of additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses.
- Subsection (4)(b)(V) of this section does not apply to a liquor-licensed drugstore licensee that was licensed as a liquor-licensed drugstore on February 21, 2016, that converted its license to a retail liquor store license after February 21, 2016, and that applied on or before May 1, 2017, to convert its retail liquor store license back to a liquor-licensed drugstore license.
-
- A liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under this section shall not store alcohol beverages off the licensed premises.
-
A licensed wholesaler shall make all deliveries of alcohol beverages to a liquor-licensed drugstore:
- Through a common carrier, a contract carrier, or on vehicles owned by the wholesaler; and
- Only to the business address of the liquor-licensed drugstore.
-
- A liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under this section on or after January 1, 2017, shall have at least one manager permitted under section 44-3-427 who works on the licensed premises. The liquor-licensed drugstore shall designate at least one permitted manager on the licensed premises to conduct the liquor-licensed drugstore's purchases of alcohol beverages from a licensed wholesaler. A licensed wholesaler shall take orders for alcohol beverages only from a permitted manager designated by the liquor-licensed drugstore.
- A liquor-licensed drugstore that is involved in selling alcohol beverages must obtain and maintain a certification as a responsible alcohol beverage vendor in accordance with part 10 of this article 3.
- An employee of a liquor-licensed drugstore who is under twenty-one years of age shall not deliver malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors offered for sale on, or sold and removed from, the licensed premises.
- A person licensed under this section that obtains additional liquor-licensed drugstore licenses in accordance with subsection (4)(b)(IV) or (4)(b)(V) of this section may operate under a single or consolidated corporate entity but shall not commingle purchases of or credit extensions for purchases of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a wholesaler licensed under this article 3 for more than one licensed premises. A wholesaler licensed under this article 3 shall not base the price for the malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors it sells to a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under this section on the total volume of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors that the licensee purchases for multiple licensed premises.
Source: L. 2018: (1)(a)(I), IP(1)(b)(IV), (1)(b)(IV)(B), and IP(4)(b)(IV) amended and (4)(b)(V) and (4)(c) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2202, § 9, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1007, § 2, effective October 1; (2)(a)(II), (2)(a)(III), and (3) amended and (7) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2202, § 9, effective January 1, 2019. L. 2020: (6)(c) amended, (SB 20-032), ch. 28, p. 98, § 1, effective September 14.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-408 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsections (1)(a)(I), IP(1)(b)(IV), (1)(b)(IV)(B), IP(4)(b)(IV), (4)(b)(V), and (4)(c) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-408 (1)(a)(I), IP(1)(b)(IV), (1)(b)(IV)(B), IP(4)(b)(IV), (4)(b)(V), and (4)(c), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsections (2)(a)(II), (2)(a)(III), (3), and (7) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-408 (2)(a)(II), (2)(a)(III), (3), and (8), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective January 1, 2019.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Applied in Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936); Geer v. Rabinoff, 138 Colo. 8, 328 P.2d 375 (1958); McIntosh v. Council of City of Littleton, 145 Colo. 533, 360 P.2d 136 (1961).
44-3-411. Beer and wine license.
- A beer and wine license shall be issued to persons selling malt and vinous liquors for consumption on the premises. Beer and wine licensees shall have sandwiches and light snacks available for consumption on the premises during business hours, but need not have meals available for consumption.
-
- Every person selling malt and vinous liquors as provided in this section shall purchase malt and vinous liquors only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, any person selling malt and vinous liquors as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt and vinous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A beer and wine licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt and vinous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the malt or vinous liquor purchased, and the price paid for the purchase. The beer and wine licensee shall retain the receipt and shall make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a beer and wine license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that the person may have an interest in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1011, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (1) and (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 9, § 12, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-409 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under the 1973 version of former § 12-47-111.
Separate classification for "hotel and restaurant" and "beer and wine" licenses. A license permitting hotels and restaurants to sell spirituous liquors in addition to beer and wine to their patrons is an entirely separate class of permit from a "beer and wine" license. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The need for separate classification is obvious in that an exclusively beer and wine license in a restaurant situation will serve a different clientele than that of a license which also provides for the service of spirituous liquors. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Provision for the separate classifications of hotel and restaurant license and beer and wine license was not an arbitrary or unreasonable act on the part of the general assembly. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license, if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Huerta v. Canjar, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
44-3-412. Bed and breakfast permit.
- In lieu of a hotel and restaurant license, a person operating a bed and breakfast with not more than twenty sleeping rooms that offers complimentary alcohol beverages for consumption only on the premises and only by overnight guests may be issued a bed and breakfast permit. A bed and breakfast permittee shall not sell alcohol beverages by the drink and shall not serve alcohol beverages for more than four hours in any one day.
- An applicant for a bed and breakfast permit is exempt from any fee otherwise assessable under section 44-3-501 (3) or 44-3-505 (4)(a), but is subject to all other fees and all other requirements of this article 3.
- A local licensing authority may, at its option, determine that bed and breakfast permits are not available within its jurisdiction.
- A bed and breakfast permit may be suspended or revoked in accordance with section 44-3-601 if the permittee violates any provision of this article 3 or any rule adopted pursuant to this article 3 or fails truthfully to furnish any required information in connection with a permit application.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a bed and breakfast permit to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that a person regulated under this section may have an interest in other bed and breakfast permits; in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w) or 44-4-104 (1)(c); or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1012, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-410 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-413. Hotel and restaurant license - definitions - rules.
-
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, a hotel and restaurant license shall be issued to persons selling alcohol beverages in the place where the alcohol beverages are to be consumed, subject to the following restrictions:
- Restaurants shall sell alcohol beverages as provided in this section only to customers of the restaurant and only if meals are actually and regularly served and provide not less than twenty-five percent of the gross income from sales of food and drink of the business of the licensed premises over any period of time of at least one year.
- Hotels shall sell alcohol beverages as provided in this section only to customers of the hotel and, except in hotel rooms, only on the licensed premises where meals are actually and regularly served and provide not less than twenty-five percent of the gross income from sales of food and drink of the business of the licensed premises over any period of time of at least one year.
- Any hotel and restaurant licensee who is open for business and selling alcohol beverages by the drink shall serve meals between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. and meals or light snacks and sandwiches after 8 p.m.; except that nothing in this subsection (1)(c) shall be construed to require a licensee to be open for business between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.
- A hotel may be designated as a resort complex if it has at least fifty sleeping rooms and has related sports and recreational facilities located contiguous or adjacent to the hotel for the convenience of its guests or the general public. For purposes of a resort complex only, "contiguous or adjacent" means within the overall boundaries or scheme of development or regularly accessible from the hotel by its members and guests.
-
- A resort complex shall designate its principal licensed premises and additional separate, related facilities that are located contiguous or adjacent to the licensed premises of the resort complex. Each related facility shall be identified by the resort complex at the time of initial licensure or upon license renewal. Each related facility shall also be clearly identified by its geographic location within the overall boundaries of the licensed premises of the resort complex. A resort complex may apply for a resort-complex-related facility permit for each related facility at the time of initial licensure, upon license renewal, or at any time upon application by the resort complex.
- Customers and guests who purchase alcohol beverages at one related facility are permitted to carry such beverages to other related facilities within the overall licensed premises boundaries of the resort complex.
- Each related facility shall remain at all times under the ownership and control of the resort complex licensee. Any subletting or transfer of ownership or change of control of a related facility without proper notification and approval by state and local licensing authorities shall be considered a violation of this article 3 and will be cause for the denial, suspension, revocation, or cancellation of the license of the entire resort complex, including all of its related facilities, pursuant to section 44-3-601.
- Except as provided in this subsection (2), for violations of section 44-3-307, and for violations of this article 3 and rules promulgated pursuant to this article 3 that are intentionally authorized by the ownership or management of a resort complex, each related facility shall be considered separately licensed or permitted for the purpose of application of the sanctions imposed under section 44-3-601.
-
For purposes of this subsection (2), "related facility" means those areas, as approved by the state and local licensing authorities, that are contiguous or adjacent to the resort hotel and that are owned by or under the exclusive possession and control of the resort complex licensee. "Related facilities" shall include:
- Those indoor areas or facilities contiguous or adjacent to the licensed premises of the resort complex that are operated under a separate trade name and are used by resort complex patrons;
- Related outdoor sports and recreation facilities located contiguous or adjacent to the resort complex that are used by patrons of the resort complex for a fee; and
- Distinct areas or facilities contiguous or adjacent to the resort complex that are directly related to the resort complex use.
-
- An institution of higher education, or a person who contracts with the institution to provide food services, that is licensed under this section may apply to be designated a campus liquor complex at the time of initial licensure or upon license renewal.
- A licensee shall designate its principal licensed premises and additional separate, related facilities that are located within the campus liquor complex. The licensee may identify each related facility that serves alcohol at the time of initial licensure or upon license renewal. To be approved for a campus liquor complex related facility permit, each related facility must be clearly identified by its geographic location within the boundaries of the campus, including the specific point of service, and each area where alcohol beverages are consumed must be clearly identified by a description and map of the area.
- A licensee may apply for a related facility permit for each related facility within the campus liquor complex at the time of initial licensure, upon license renewal, or at any time upon application by the licensee.
-
- To be permitted, each related facility must remain at all times under the ownership or control of the licensee. A licensee that sublets or transfers ownership of, or changes control of, a related facility without notifying and obtaining approval from state and local licensing authorities violates this article 3, and the violation is grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or cancellation of the campus liquor complex license and all related facility permits in accordance with section 44-3-601.
- The institution of higher education shall designate a manager for the campus liquor complex and for each related facility.
- Except as provided in this subsection (3), for violations of this article 3 and rules promulgated under this article 3 that are intentionally authorized by the ownership or management of a related facility, each related facility is deemed separately permitted for the purpose of application of the sanctions authorized under section 44-3-601.
- For purposes of this subsection (3), "related facility" means those areas approved by the state and local licensing authorities that are on the campus of the institution of higher education licensed under this section and that are owned by or under the exclusive possession and control of the institution of higher education holding the license. "Related facilities" include an area or facility operated under a separate trade name.
-
Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, a hotel, licensed pursuant to this article 3, may:
- Furnish and deliver complimentary alcohol beverages in sealed containers for the convenience of its guests;
- Sell alcohol beverages provided by the hotel in sealed containers, at any time, by means of a minibar located in hotel guest rooms, to adult registered guests of the hotel for consumption in guest rooms if the price of the alcohol beverages is clearly posted. For purposes of this section, "minibar" means a closed container, either nonrefrigerated or refrigerated in whole or in part, access to the interior of which is restricted by means of a locking device that requires the use of a key, magnetic card, or similar device or which is controlled at all times by the hotel.
- Enter into a contract with a lodging facility for the purpose of authorizing the lodging facility to sell alcohol beverages pursuant to subsection (4)(b) of this section if the lodging facility and hotel share common ownership and are located within one thousand feet of one another. The alcohol beverages that may be sold pursuant to this subsection (4)(c) must be provided by and subject to the control of the licensed hotel. For purposes of this subsection (4)(c), "common ownership" means a controlling ownership interest that is held by the same person or persons, whether through separate corporations, partnerships, or other legal entities. To determine whether the distance limitation referred to in this subsection (4)(c) is met, the distance from the property line of the land used for the lodging facility to the portion of the hotel licensed under this article 3 shall be measured using the nearest and most direct routes of pedestrian access.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules that prohibit the placement of a container of alcohol beverages in a minibar if the container has a capacity of more than five hundred milliliters.
- It is the intent of this section to require hotel and restaurant licensees to maintain a bona fide restaurant business and not a mere pretext of such for obtaining a hotel and restaurant license.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (7)(b) of this section, every person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3.
-
- During a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A hotel and restaurant licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- Each hotel and restaurant license shall be granted for specific premises, and optional premises approved by the state and local licensing authorities, and issued in the name of the owner or lessee of the business.
- Repealed.
- The manager for each hotel and restaurant license, the hotel and restaurant licensee, or an employee or agent of the hotel and restaurant licensee shall purchase alcohol beverages for one licensed premises only, and the purchases shall be separate and distinct from purchases for any other hotel and restaurant license.
- Repealed.
- Repealed.
- Repealed.
-
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a hotel and restaurant license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- Notwithstanding subsection (14)(a) of this section, an owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a hotel and restaurant license may conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1012, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (7) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 9, § 13, effective January 31. L. 2022: (9) and (11) to (13) repealed and (10) amended, (HB 22-1415), ch. 426, p. 3017, § 2, effective June 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-411 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Separate classification for "hotel and restaurant" and "beer and wine" licenses. A license permitting hotels and restaurants to sell spirituous liquors in addition to beer and wine to their patrons is an entirely separate class of permit from a "beer and wine" license. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The need for separate classification is obvious in that an exclusively beer and wine license in a restaurant situation will serve a different clientele than that of a license which also provides for the service of spirituous liquors. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Provision for the separate classifications of hotel and restaurant license and beer and wine license was not an arbitrary or unreasonable act on the part of the general assembly. Huerta v. Canjar, 37 Colo. App. 462, 550 P.2d 897 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
The requirement that a licensee maintain a bona fide restaurant business does not impose a reasonable man standard of what constitutes a conventional restaurant. The fact that the licensee has a lack of tables in the facility and has late hours of operation does not support a conclusion that the licensee was not a bona fide restaurant. Kantara, Inc. v. State of Colo., 991 P.2d 332 (Colo. App. 1999).
The fact that a particular type of license is not authorized in the neighborhood does not require the issuance of such a license, if, in fact, the needs of the neighborhood, with respect to the type of beverage authorized to be sold by the license requested, are being met by existing licenses. Huerta v. Canjar, 193 Colo. 388, 566 P.2d 1071 (1977).
Regulation prohibiting employees from mingling and soliciting drinks proper. Regulation of department of revenue, prohibiting liquor establishment licensee from employing a person to "mingle with patrons" and personally solicit the purchase or sale of drinks for use of one soliciting, was a proper exercise of authority delegated by the general assembly. People v. Willson, 187 Colo. 141, 528 P.2d 1315 (1974).
Applied in Nobel, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 652 P.2d 1084 (Colo. App. 1982); Mountain's Shadow Inn, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Labor & Emp., 672 P.2d 522 (Colo. 1983).
44-3-414. Tavern license.
- A tavern license shall be issued to persons selling alcohol beverages by the drink only to customers for consumption on the premises. A tavern licensee shall have sandwiches and light snacks available for consumption on the premises during business hours, but need not have meals available for consumption.
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A tavern licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The tavern licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in tavern licenses to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that the person may have an interest in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
- Repealed.
- The manager for each tavern license, the tavern licensee, or an employee or agent of the tavern licensee shall purchase alcohol beverages for one licensed premises only, and the purchases shall be separate and distinct from purchases for any other tavern license.
- Repealed.
- Repealed.
- Repealed.
-
- At the time a tavern license is due for renewal or by one year after August 10, 2016, whichever occurs later, a tavern licensed under this section that does not have as its principal business the sale of alcohol beverages, has a valid license on August 10, 2016, and is a lodging and entertainment facility may apply to, and the applicable local licensing authority shall, convert the tavern license to a lodging and entertainment license under section 44-3-428, and the licensee may continue to operate as a lodging and entertainment facility licensee. If a tavern licensee does not have as its principal business the sale of alcohol beverages but is not a lodging and entertainment facility, at the time the tavern license is due for renewal or by one year after August 10, 2016, whichever occurs later, the licensee may apply to, and the applicable local licensing authority shall, convert the tavern license to another license under this article 3, if any, for which the person qualifies.
- A person applying under this subsection (9) to convert an existing tavern license to another license under this article 3 may apply to convert the license, even if the location of the licensed premises is within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary, so long as the local licensing authority has previously approved the location of the licensed premises in accordance with section 44-3-313 (1)(d).
Source: L. 2018: (9)(a) amended, (HB 18-1375), ch. 274, p. 1696, § 7, effective May 29; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1017, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 10, § 14, effective January 31. L. 2022: (4) and (6) to (8) repealed and (5) amended, (HB 22-1415), ch. 426, p. 3018, § 3, effective June 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-412 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (9)(a) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-412 (9)(a) in HB 18-1375. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-3-415. Optional premises license.
- An optional premises license shall be granted for optional premises approved by the state and local licensing authorities to persons selling alcohol beverages by the drink only to customers for consumption on the optional premises and for storing alcohol beverages in a secure area on or off the optional premises for future use on the optional premises.
-
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in an optional premises license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- Notwithstanding subsection (2)(a) of this section, an owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in an optional premises license may own, either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1019, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-413 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-416. Retail gaming tavern license.
- A retail gaming tavern license shall be issued to persons who are licensed pursuant to section 44-30-501 (1)(c), who sell alcohol beverages by individual drink for consumption on the premises, and who sell sandwiches or light snacks or who contract with an establishment that provides the food services within the same building as the licensed premises. In no event shall any person hold more than three retail gaming tavern licenses.
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages as described in this section shall purchase the alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A retail gaming tavern licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- Nothing in this article 3 shall permit more than one retail gaming tavern license per building where the licensed premises are located.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a retail gaming tavern license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that the person may have an interest in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1019, § 2, effective October 1; (1) amended, (SB 18-034), ch. 14, p. 238, § 8, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 10, § 15, effective January 31.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-414 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (1) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-414 (1) in SB 18-034. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-3-417. Brew pub license - definitions.
-
- A brew pub license may be issued to any person operating a brew pub and also selling alcohol beverages for consumption on the premises.
- A brew pub licensed pursuant to this section to manufacture malt liquors upon its licensed premises may, upon approval of the state licensing authority, manufacture malt liquors upon alternating proprietor licensed premises within the restrictions specified in section 44-3-103 (5).
-
-
Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, during the hours established in section 44-3-901 (6)(b), malt liquors manufactured by a brew pub licensee on the licensed premises or alternating proprietor licensed premises may be:
- Furnished for consumption on the premises;
- Sold to independent wholesalers for distribution to licensed retailers;
- Sold to the public in sealed containers for off-premises consumption. Except as provided in subsection (2)(a.5) of this section, only malt liquors manufactured and packaged by the licensee on the licensed premises or on an alternating proprietor licensed premises may be sold to the public in sealed containers.
- Sold at wholesale to licensed retailers in an amount up to three hundred thousand gallons per calendar year.
-
- For purposes of sales to the public in sealed containers pursuant to subsection (2)(a)(III) of this section, a brew pub licensee may also sell on the licensed premises malt liquors that are manufactured by the licensee on another brew pub licensed premises that is under the same ownership as the brew pub licensed premises at which the sale occurs.
- As used in this subsection (2)(a.5), "same ownership" means that a person or group of persons has at least fifty percent ownership interest in the licensed brew pub at which the sale to the public of malt liquors in sealed containers occurs and in another brew pub licensed premises at which the malt liquors being sold were manufactured.
- A brew pub authorized to manufacture malt liquors upon alternating proprietor licensed premises shall not conduct retail sales of malt liquors from an area licensed or defined as an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
-
Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, during the hours established in section 44-3-901 (6)(b), malt liquors manufactured by a brew pub licensee on the licensed premises or alternating proprietor licensed premises may be:
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages pursuant to this section shall purchase alcohol beverages, other than those that are manufactured at the licensed brew pub, from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- The brew pub licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- A brew pub licensee shall sell alcohol beverages for on-premises consumption only if at least fifteen percent of the gross on-premises food and drink income of the business of the licensed premises is from the sale of food. For purposes of this subsection (4), "food" means a quantity of foodstuffs of such nature as is ordinarily consumed by an individual at regular intervals for the purpose of sustenance.
-
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a brew pub license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- Notwithstanding subsection (5)(a) of this section, a person interested directly or indirectly in a brew pub license may conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1020, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (1)(b), IP(2)(a), (2)(a)(III), (2)(b), and (3) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 11, § 16, effective January 31. L. 2020: (2)(a)(III) amended and (2)(a.5) added, (SB 20-194), ch. 263, p. 1264, § 1, effective September 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-415 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-418. Club license - legislative declaration.
- A club license shall be issued to persons selling alcohol beverages by the drink only to members of the club and guests and only for consumption on the premises of the club.
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase the alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- The club licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
-
- The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that the people of the state of Colorado desire to promote and achieve tax equity and fairness among all the state's citizens and further desire to conform to the public policy of nondiscrimination. The general assembly further declares that the provisions of this subsection (3) are enacted for these reasons and for no other purpose.
- Any club licensee that has a policy to restrict membership on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, race, creed, religion, color, ancestry, or national origin shall, when issuing a receipt for expenses that may otherwise be used by taxpayers for deduction purposes pursuant to section 162 (a) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, for purposes of determining taxes owed pursuant to article 22 of title 39, incorporate a printed statement on the receipt as follows:
-
It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a club license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that:
- Such a person may have an interest in an arts license or an airline public transportation system license granted under this article 3, or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4);
- Any person who owns, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, any other license issued pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 may be listed as an officer or director on a club license if the person does not individually manage or receive any direct financial benefit from the operation of the license.
The expenditures covered by this receipt are nondeductible for state income tax purposes.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1021, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 11, § 17, effective January 31. L. 2021: (3)(b) amended, (HB 21-1108), ch. 156, p. 899, § 49, effective September 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-416 as it existed prior to 2018.
Cross references: (1) For section 162 (a) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", see 26 U.S.C. § 162 (a).
(2) For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1108, see section 1 of chapter 156, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.
44-3-419. Arts license - definition.
-
- An arts license may be issued to any nonprofit arts organization that sponsors and presents productions or performances of an artistic or cultural nature, and the arts license permits the licensee to sell alcohol beverages only to patrons of the productions or performances for consumption on the licensed premises in connection with the productions or performances. No person licensed pursuant to this section shall permit any exterior or interior advertising concerning the sale of alcohol beverages on the licensed premises.
- An arts license may be issued to any municipality owning arts facilities at which productions or performances of an artistic or cultural nature are presented, in the same manner as provided for in subsection (1)(a) of this section and subject to the same restrictions.
- Any provision of this article 3 to the contrary notwithstanding, the proximity of premises licensed pursuant to this section to any public or parochial school or the principal campus of a college, university, or seminary shall not, in and of itself, affect the granting or denial of such license by the state and the local licensing authority, but a public or parochial school shall not contain a licensed premises. The campus of a college, university, or seminary may contain a licensed premises.
- As used in this section, "nonprofit arts organization" means only an organization subject to the provisions of articles 121 to 137 of title 7 and held to be tax-exempt by the federal internal revenue service.
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase the alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- An arts licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1022, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (4) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 12, § 18, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-417 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-420. Racetrack license.
- A racetrack licensee may sell alcohol beverages by the drink for consumption on the licensed premises only to customers of the racetrack and shall serve food as well as alcohol beverages.
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase the alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A racetrack licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- If any person holds a valid license pursuant to this article 3 to sell alcohol beverages by the drink for consumption on the licensed premises, the person is not required to obtain a racetrack class license pursuant to this section if simulcast races with pari-mutuel wagering occur on the licensed premises.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a racetrack license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that a person licensed under this section may have an interest in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1023, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 12, § 19, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-418 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-421. Public transportation system license.
- The state licensing authority shall issue a public transportation system license to every person operating a public transportation system that sells alcohol beverages by the drink to be served and consumed in or upon any dining, club, or parlor car; plane; bus; or other conveyance of the public transportation system. A public transportation system license issued to a commercial airline authorizes the licensee to sell alcohol beverages by the drink in an airport or airport concourse private club room that is in existence and operated by the licensee on or before April 1, 1995. A public transportation system license issued to a common carrier railroad authorizes the licensee to sell alcohol beverages by the drink at any event not open to the public that is held in a museum owned and operated by the licensee if the licensee notifies the appropriate local law enforcement agency of the event no later than fourteen days prior to the scheduled date of the event.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a public transportation system license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that a person licensed under this section may be interested in any other retail license issued pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1024, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-419 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-422. Vintner's restaurant license.
-
- A vintner's restaurant license may be issued to a person operating a vintner's restaurant and also selling alcohol beverages for consumption on the premises.
- A vintner's restaurant licensed pursuant to this section to manufacture vinous liquors upon its licensed premises may, upon approval of the state licensing authority, manufacture vinous liquors upon alternating proprietor licensed premises within the restrictions specified in section 44-3-103 (60).
-
-
Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, during the hours established in section 44-3-901 (6)(b), vinous liquors manufactured by a vintner's restaurant licensee on the licensed premises may be:
- Furnished for consumption on the premises;
- Sold to independent wholesalers for distribution to licensed retailers;
- Sold to the public in sealed containers for off-premises consumption. Only vinous liquors fermented, manufactured, and packaged on the licensed premises or alternating proprietor licensed premises by the licensee shall be sold in sealed containers.
- Sold at wholesale to licensed retailers in an amount up to fifty thousand gallons per calendar year.
- A vintner's restaurant authorized to manufacture vinous liquors upon alternating proprietor licensed premises shall not conduct retail sales of vinous liquors from an area licensed or defined as an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
-
Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, during the hours established in section 44-3-901 (6)(b), vinous liquors manufactured by a vintner's restaurant licensee on the licensed premises may be:
-
- Every person selling alcohol beverages pursuant to this section shall purchase the alcohol beverages, other than those that are manufactured at the licensed vintner's restaurant, from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a person may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- The vintner's restaurant licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- A vintner's restaurant licensee may sell alcohol beverages for on-premises consumption only if at least fifteen percent of the gross on-premises food and drink income of the business of the licensed premises is from the sale of food.
-
- Subject to subsection (5)(b) of this section, it is unlawful for an owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a vintner's restaurant license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in another business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
- A person interested directly or indirectly in a vintner's restaurant license may conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c) or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1025, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (3) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 13, § 20, effective January 31. L. 2020: (1) and (2) amended, (HB 20-1055), ch. 15, p. 67, § 2, effective September 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-420 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-423. Removal of vinous liquor from licensed premises.
- Notwithstanding any provision of this article 3 to the contrary, a licensee described in subsection (2) of this section may permit a customer of the licensee to reseal and remove from the licensed premises one opened container of partially consumed vinous liquor purchased on the premises so long as the originally sealed container did not contain more than seven hundred fifty milliliters of vinous liquor.
-
This section applies to a person:
-
That is duly licensed as a:
- Manufacturer under section 44-3-402;
- Limited winery under section 44-3-403;
- Beer and wine licensee under section 44-3-411;
- Hotel and restaurant under section 44-3-413;
- Tavern under section 44-3-414;
- Brew pub under section 44-3-417;
- Vintner's restaurant under section 44-3-422;
- Club under section 44-3-418;
- Distillery pub under section 44-3-426; or
- Lodging and entertainment facility under section 44-3-428; and
- That has meals, as defined in section 44-3-103 (31), or sandwiches and light snacks available for consumption on the licensed premises.
-
That is duly licensed as a:
Source: L. 2018: (2)(b) amended, (SB 18-173), ch. 102, p. 780, § 1, effective August 8; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1026, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-421 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (2)(b) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-421 (2)(b) in SB 18-173. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-3-424. Art gallery permit - definition.
- A person operating an art gallery that offers complimentary alcohol beverages for consumption only on the premises may be issued an art gallery permit, which shall be renewed annually. An art gallery permittee shall not, directly or indirectly, sell alcohol beverages by the drink, shall not serve alcohol beverages for more than four hours in any one day, and shall not serve alcohol beverages more than fifteen days per year of licensure.
-
- The state or local licensing authority may reject the application for an art gallery permit if the applicant fails to establish that the applicant is able to offer complimentary alcohol beverages without violating this section or creating a public safety risk to the neighborhood.
- Upon initial application, and for each renewal, the applicant shall list each day that alcohol beverages will be served, which days shall not be changed without a minimum of fifteen days' written notice to the state and local licensing authority.
- An art gallery shall not be denied an art gallery permit based solely on the art gallery's proximity to any public or private school or the principal campus of a college, university, or seminary.
- An art gallery shall not charge an entrance fee or a cover charge in connection with offering complimentary alcohol beverages for consumption only on the premises.
- An art gallery permit may be suspended or revoked in accordance with section 44-3-601 if the permittee violates any provision of this article 3 or any rule adopted pursuant to this article 3 or fails to truthfully furnish any required information in connection with a permit application.
- It is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in an art gallery permit to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44; except that a person regulated under this section may have an interest in other art gallery permits; in a license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c); or in a financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
- As used in this section, "art gallery" means an establishment whose primary purpose is to exhibit and offer for sale works of fine art as defined in section 6-15-101 or precious or semiprecious metals or stones as defined in section 18-16-102.
- An art gallery issued a permit shall not intentionally allow more than two hundred fifty people to be on the premises at one time when alcohol beverages are being served.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate any insurance coverage required by law; to authorize a licensed art gallery to violate section 44-3-901, including, without limitation, serving a visibly intoxicated person and taking an alcohol beverage off the licensed premises; or to violate any zoning or occupancy ordinances or laws.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1027, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-422 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-425. Wine packaging permit - limitations - rules.
-
- The state licensing authority may issue a wine packaging permit to a winery licensed under section 44-3-402, a limited winery licensed under section 44-3-403, or a wholesaler licensed under section 44-3-407 that allows the licensed winery, limited winery, or wholesaler to package tax-paid wine manufactured by another winery or manufacturer.
-
A licensed winery, limited winery, or wholesaler that obtains a wine packaging permit under this section shall:
- Take possession and custody of the tax-paid wine that it packages; and
- Return the packaged tax-paid wine either to the original manufacturer of the tax-paid wine or to the original manufacturer's licensed wholesaler; except that, if the original manufacturer's wholesaler obtains a wine packaging permit pursuant to this section, the wholesaler need not return the packaged tax-paid wine to the original manufacturer.
-
A licensed winery or limited winery that obtains a wine packaging permit pursuant to this section shall not sell or distribute tax-paid wine it packages:
- To a person licensed to sell alcohol beverages at retail, for consumption on or off the licensed premises, under section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, 44-3-411, 44-3-412, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-415, 44-3-416, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-419, 44-3-420, 44-3-421, 44-3-422, 44-3-424, 44-3-426, or 44-3-428; or
- Directly to a consumer.
- The state licensing authority may adopt rules as necessary to implement and administer this section.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1028, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-423 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-426. Distillery pub license - legislative declaration - definition.
-
The general assembly finds and determines that:
- Colorado is a state that welcomes and encourages entrepreneurs and new business opportunities;
- Currently, manufacturing of spirituous liquors by persons licensed as manufacturers pursuant to section 44-3-402 is a thriving industry, with new distilleries opening throughout the state and increasing the availability of Colorado-produced craft spirits both within and outside the state;
- The spirituous liquors manufacturing business focuses primarily on producing a spirituous liquor product that the licensed spirits manufacturer can then sell and distribute, through a wholesaler, throughout the state and in other states to retail outlets;
- While licensed spirits manufacturers are permitted to sell their products directly to consumers, the majority of the manufacturing business is selling the bulk of a manufacturer's product to retail outlets that then sell the product to consumers;
- On the other hand, the main focus of a distillery pub business authorized by this section is to operate a local pub in which food and alcohol beverages, including a small quantity of spirituous liquors fermented and distilled on site, are sold and served for on-premises consumption;
- While a distillery pub is allowed to produce, serve, and distribute its own spirituous liquors, unlike a licensed spirits manufacturer, the production level for a distillery pub is capped, and the ability to distribute to retail outlets is greatly restricted, thereby establishing a new business model that is distinct from, and serves a different clientele than, a licensed spirits manufacturer;
- Additionally, unlike a licensed spirits manufacturer, which is only required to obtain a license from the state licensing authority, a distillery pub must obtain both a state and local license after demonstrating that the distillery pub meets the reasonable requirements and the desires of the adult inhabitants of the neighborhood in which it will be situated; and
- It is important to encourage the new distillery pub business model, which will add to the thriving craft spirits industry in this state without disrupting the ever-growing spirituous liquors manufacturing industry.
- A distillery pub license may be issued to any person operating a distillery pub and also selling food and alcohol beverages for consumption on the premises. At least fifteen percent of the gross on-premises food and alcohol beverage income of the licensed distillery pub must be from the sale of food. For purposes of this subsection (2), "food" means a quantity of foodstuffs of a nature that is ordinarily consumed by an individual at regular intervals for the purpose of sustenance.
-
During the hours established in section 44-3-901 (6)(b), a licensed distillery pub may, with regard to spirituous liquors fermented and distilled by the distillery pub licensee on the licensed premises:
- Furnish its spirituous liquors for consumption on the premises;
- Sell its spirituous liquors to independent wholesalers for distribution to licensed retailers;
- Sell its spirituous liquors to the public in sealed containers for off-premises consumption, as long as the spirituous liquors are fermented, distilled, and packaged on the licensed premises by the licensee; or
- Sell its spirituous liquors at wholesale to licensed retailers in an amount up to two thousand seven hundred liters per spirituous liquor product per calendar year.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (4)(b) of this section, every person selling alcohol beverages pursuant to this section must purchase alcohol beverages, other than those that are fermented and distilled at the licensed distillery pub, from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3.
-
- During a calendar year, a person selling alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- The distillery pub licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (5)(b) of this section, it is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a distillery pub license to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
A person interested directly or indirectly in a distillery pub license may conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in:
- Other distillery pub licenses;
- A license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c); or
- A financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1028, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (4) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 13, § 21, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-424 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-427. Liquor-licensed drugstore manager's permit.
- The state licensing authority may issue a manager's permit to an individual who is employed by a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410 and who will be in actual control of the liquor-licensed drugstore's alcohol beverage operations.
-
An individual seeking a manager's permit shall apply to the state licensing authority in the form and manner required by the state licensing authority. To obtain a manager's permit, the individual must demonstrate that he or she:
- Has not been convicted of a crime involving the sale or distribution of alcohol beverages within the eight years immediately preceding the date on which the application is submitted;
- Has not been convicted of any felony within the five years immediately preceding the date on which the application is submitted; except that in considering the conviction of a felony, the state licensing authority is governed by section 24-5-101;
- Is at least twenty-one years of age; and
- Has not had a manager's permit or any similar permit issued by the state, a local jurisdiction, or another state or foreign jurisdiction revoked by the issuing authority within the three years immediately preceding the date on which the application is submitted.
-
It is unlawful for an individual who has a manager's permit issued under this section to be interested directly or indirectly in:
- A wholesaler licensed pursuant to section 44-3-407;
- A limited winery licensed pursuant to section 44-3-403;
- An importer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-405;
- A manufacturer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 or 44-3-406; or
- Any business licensed under this article 3 that has had its license revoked by the state licensing authority within the eight years immediately preceding the date on which the individual applies for a manager's permit under this section.
- In recognition of the state's flourishing local breweries, wineries, and distilleries that locally produce high-quality malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors, managers of liquor-licensed drugstores are encouraged to purchase and promote locally produced alcohol beverage products in their liquor-licensed drugstores.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1030, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-425 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-428. Lodging and entertainment license.
- A lodging and entertainment license may be issued to a lodging and entertainment facility selling alcohol beverages by the drink only to customers for consumption on the premises. A lodging and entertainment facility licensee shall have sandwiches and light snacks available for consumption on the premises during business hours but need not have meals available for consumption.
-
- A lodging and entertainment facility licensed to sell alcohol beverages as provided in this section shall purchase alcohol beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to this article 3; except that, during a calendar year, a lodging and entertainment facility licensed to sell alcohol beverages as provided in this section may purchase not more than two thousand dollars' worth of malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors from retailers licensed pursuant to sections 44-3-409, 44-3-410, and 44-4-104 (1)(c).
- A lodging and entertainment facility licensee shall retain evidence of each purchase of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors from a retailer licensed pursuant to section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, or 44-4-104 (1)(c), in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the licensed retailer, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The lodging and entertainment facility licensee shall retain the receipt and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (3)(b) of this section, it is unlawful for any owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in lodging and entertainment licenses to conduct, own either in whole or in part, or be directly or indirectly interested in any other business licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
An owner, part owner, shareholder, or person interested directly or indirectly in a lodging and entertainment license may have an interest in:
- A license described in section 44-3-401 (1)(j) to (1)(t), (1)(v), or (1)(w), 44-3-412 (1), or 44-4-104 (1)(c); or
- A financial institution referred to in section 44-3-308 (4).
-
- (Deleted by amendment, L. 2022.)
- The manager for each lodging and entertainment license, the lodging and entertainment facility licensee, or an employee or agent of the lodging and entertainment facility licensee shall purchase alcohol beverages for one licensed premises only, and the purchases shall be separate and distinct from purchases for any other lodging and entertainment license.
- (Deleted by amendment, L. 2022.)
- At the time a tavern license issued under section 44-3-414 is due for renewal or by one year after August 10, 2016, whichever occurs later, a person licensed as a tavern that does not have as its principal business the sale of alcohol beverages, has a valid license on August 10, 2016, and is a lodging and entertainment facility may apply to, and the applicable local licensing authority shall, convert the tavern license to a lodging and entertainment license under this section, and the person may continue to operate as a lodging and entertainment facility licensee. A person applying to convert an existing tavern license to a lodging and entertainment license under this subsection (5) may apply to convert the license, even if the location of the licensed premises is within five hundred feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college, university, or seminary, so long as the local licensing authority has previously approved the location of the licensed premises in accordance with section 44-3-313 (1)(d).
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1031, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 14, § 22, effective January 31. L. 2022: (4) amended, (HB 22-1415), ch. 426, p. 3019, § 4, effective June 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-426 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-429. Purchasing alcohol from a surrendered license of common ownership - definition.
-
This section applies to a person that has been issued the following license types:
- Beer and wine license under section 44-3-411;
- Hotel and restaurant license under section 44-3-413;
- Tavern license under section 44-3-414;
- Retail gaming tavern license under section 44-3-416;
- Brew pub license under section 44-3-417;
- Club license under section 44-3-418;
- Arts license under section 44-3-419;
- Racetrack license under section 44-3-420;
- Vintner's restaurant license under section 44-3-422;
- Distillery pub license under section 44-3-426; or
- Lodging and entertainment facility license under section 44-3-428.
-
Notwithstanding sections 44-3-411, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-416, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-419, 44-3-420, 44-3-422, 44-3-426, and 44-3-428, a current licensee listed in subsection (1) of this section may purchase the remaining alcohol beverage inventory from a former licensee listed in subsection (1) of this section if:
- Within the last sixty days, the seller's license for a licensed premises has been surrendered or revoked or the seller has lost legal possession of the licensed premises; and
- There is common ownership between the seller and the purchaser.
-
In order to sell the remaining alcohol beverage inventory from a licensed premises for which a license is being surrendered or revoked or of which the seller has lost legal possession to another licensee listed in subsection (1) of this section, the seller must:
- Have surrendered the license for the premises within the last sixty days, have had the license for the premises revoked within the last sixty days, or have lost legal possession of the licensed premises within the last sixty days;
- Return, within thirty days after the license was surrendered or revoked or the seller lost legal possession of the licensed premises, all alcohol beverages that the seller has not paid for to the wholesaler from whom the seller obtained the alcohol beverages on credit, and the wholesaler shall cancel the debt for the returned inventory;
- Offer and give wholesalers from whom the seller purchased remaining alcohol beverages a thirty-day option to repurchase any remaining alcohol beverages that the wholesaler sold to the seller before selling any inventory to a purchaser listed in subsection (1) of this section;
- Possess proof that all wholesalers the seller has purchased alcohol beverages from for the licensed premises have been paid in full for those purchases; and
- Sell the alcohol beverage inventory for only one licensed premises.
- The licensee purchasing alcohol beverages under this section shall retain evidence of the purchase in the form of a purchase receipt showing the name of the seller, the date of purchase, a description of the alcohol beverages purchased, and the price paid for the alcohol beverages. The licensee shall retain the receipt for three years and make it available to the state and local licensing authorities at all times during business hours.
- The state licensing authority shall not promulgate rules that regulate or establish the price at which the inventory may be sold under this section.
- A wholesaler shall not transport the alcohol beverage inventory from the seller's premises to the purchaser's premises. The seller may transport the alcohol beverage inventory to the purchaser's licensed premises.
-
Nothing in this section allows a licensee to sell alcohol beverages if:
- The seller's license is not being surrendered or revoked or the seller did not lose legal possession of the licensed premises within the last sixty days;
- Common ownership does not exist;
- The seller is selling the business and transferring the license to a new owner; or
- The seller is changing the location of the licensed premises.
- For the purposes of this section, "common ownership" means that a person owns at least a ten percent ownership interest in both the seller and the purchaser at the time the license is surrendered or revoked or the seller lost legal possession of the licensed premises.
Source: L. 2018: Entire section added, (SB 18-138), ch. 94, p. 737, § 1, effective August 8.
Editor's note: This section was numbered as § 12-47-427 in SB 18-138. That section was harmonized with HB 18-1025 and relocated to this section.
PART 5 LICENSE FEES AND EXCISE TAXES
44-3-501. State fees - rules - one-time fee waiver - repeal.
-
The applicant shall pay the following license and permit fees to the department annually in advance:
-
For each resident and nonresident manufacturer's license, the fee shall be:
- For each brewery, three hundred dollars;
- For each winery, three hundred dollars;
-
For each distillery or rectifier:
- On or after August 10, 2016, and before August 10, 2017, six hundred seventy-five dollars; and
- On or after August 10, 2017, three hundred dollars;
- For each limited winery, seventy dollars;
- For each importer's license, three hundred dollars;
-
For each wholesaler's liquor license:
- On or after August 10, 2016, and before August 10, 2017, eight hundred dollars; and
- On or after August 10, 2017, five hundred fifty dollars;
- For each wholesaler's beer license, five hundred fifty dollars;
- For each retail liquor store license, one hundred dollars;
- For each liquor-licensed drugstore license, one hundred dollars;
- For each beer and wine license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each hotel and restaurant license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each resort-complex-related facility permit, seventy-five dollars per related facility, as defined in section 44-3-413 (2)(e);
- For each related facility permit, seventy-five dollars per related facility, as defined in section 44-3-413 (3)(f);
- For each tavern license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each optional premises license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each retail gaming tavern license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each brew pub, distillery pub, or vintner's restaurant license, three hundred twenty-five dollars;
- For each club license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each arts license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each racetrack license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each public transportation system license, seventy-five dollars for each dining, club, or parlor car; plane; bus; or other vehicle in which such liquor is sold. No additional license fee shall be required by any municipality, city and county, or county for the sale of such liquor in dining, club, or parlor cars; planes; buses; or other conveyances.
- For each bed and breakfast permit, fifty dollars;
- For each art gallery permit, fifty dollars;
- For each wine packaging permit, two hundred dollars;
- For each lodging and entertainment license, seventy-five dollars;
- For each manager's permit, one hundred dollars.
-
For each resident and nonresident manufacturer's license, the fee shall be:
- Notwithstanding the amount specified for any fee in subsection (1) of this section, the executive director by rule, or as otherwise provided by law, may reduce the amount of one or more of the fees if necessary pursuant to section 24-75-402 (3) to reduce the uncommitted reserves of the fund to which all or any portion of one or more of the fees is credited. After the uncommitted reserves of the fund are sufficiently reduced, the executive director, by rule or as otherwise provided by law, may increase the amount of one or more of the fees as provided in section 24-75-402 (4).
-
-
The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
- Applications for new liquor licenses pursuant to section 44-3-304 and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications to change location pursuant to section 44-3-301 (9) and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for transfer of ownership pursuant to section 44-3-303 (1)(c) and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for modification of licensed premises pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for alternating use of premises pursuant to section 44-3-402 (3), 44-3-403 (2)(a), or 44-3-417 (1)(b) and rules adopted pursuant to those sections;
- Applications for branch warehouse permits pursuant to section 44-3-407 and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for approval of a contract to sell alcohol beverages pursuant to section 44-3-413 (4)(c);
- Applications for warehouse storage permits pursuant to section 44-3-202 and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for duplicate licenses;
- Applications for wine shipment permits pursuant to section 44-3-104;
- Sole source registrations or new product registrations pursuant to section 44-3-901 (4)(b);
- Hotel and restaurant optional premises registrations;
- Expired license renewal and reissuance applications pursuant to section 44-3-302;
- Notice of change of name or trade name pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules adopted pursuant to that section;
- Applications for wine packing permits pursuant to section 44-3-425;
- Applications for transfer of ownership, change of location, and license merger and conversion pursuant to section 44-3-410 (1)(b);
- Applications for manager's permits pursuant to section 44-3-427;
- Applications for the renewal of a license or permit issued in accordance with this article 3; and
- Applications for a permit for or attachment to a communal outdoor dining area or for modification of a licensed premises to include a communal outdoor dining area.
- The amounts of such fees, when added to the other fees transferred to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund pursuant to sections 44-4-105, 44-3-502 (1), and 44-5-104 shall reflect the direct and indirect costs of the liquor enforcement division and the state licensing authority in the administration and enforcement of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44.
- The state licensing authority may charge corporate applicants and limited liability companies licensed under this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 a fee for the cost of each fingerprint analysis and background investigation undertaken to qualify new officers, directors, stockholders, members, or managers pursuant to the requirements of section 44-3-307 (1); however, the state licensing authority shall not collect such a fee if the applicant has already undergone a background investigation by and paid a fee to a local licensing authority.
- At least annually, the amounts of the fees shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted to reflect the direct and indirect costs of the liquor enforcement division and the state licensing authority.
-
The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
- Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, the state licensing authority shall establish a basic fee which shall be paid at the time of service of any subpoena upon the state licensing authority or upon any employee of the division, plus a fee for meals and a fee for mileage at the rate prescribed for state officers and employees in section 24-9-104 for each mile actually and necessarily traveled in going to and returning from the place named in the subpoena. If the person named in the subpoena is required to attend the place named in the subpoena for more than one day, there shall be paid, in advance, a sum to be established by the state licensing authority for each day of attendance to cover the expenses of the person named in the subpoena.
- The subpoena fee established pursuant to subsection (4) of this section shall not be applicable to any state or local governmental agency.
-
-
Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, the following fees imposed pursuant to this section are waived for twelve months following December 7, 2020:
- License fees imposed pursuant to subsections (1)(a)(IV), (1)(g), (1)(h), (1)(i), (1)(j), (1)(k), (1)(l), (1)(m), (1)(n), (1)(o), (1)(p), (1)(q), and (1)(v) of this section and pursuant to section 44-4-105;
- Application fees imposed pursuant to subsections (3)(a)(I), (3)(a)(XII), and (3)(a)(XIII) of this section and pursuant to regulation 47-302 (F), 1 CCR 203-2; and
- All fees associated with the renewal of a license.
-
The waiver of fees specified in subsection (6)(a) of this section applies to the following license types:
- A limited winery license under section 44-3-403;
- A beer and wine license under section 44-3-411;
- A hotel and restaurant license under section 44-3-413;
- A tavern license under section 44-3-414;
- An optional premises license under section 44-3-415;
- A retail gaming tavern license under section 44-3-416;
- A brew pub license under section 44-3-417;
- A club license under section 44-3-418;
- An arts license under section 44-3-419;
- A racetrack license under section 44-3-420;
- A vintner's restaurant license under section 44-3-422;
- A distillery pub license under section 44-3-426;
- A lodging and entertainment license under section 44-3-428;
- A fermented malt beverage license under section 44-4-107 (1)(b); and
- A fermented malt beverage license under section 44-4-107 (1)(c).
- The general assembly shall appropriate an amount not to exceed one million eight hundred seventy-eight thousand dollars from the general fund to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund for use by the department to offset the reduction in fee revenues used by the department for the direct and indirect costs of the liquor enforcement division and the state licensing authority in the administration and enforcement of articles 3 to 5 of this title 44.
- This subsection (6) is repealed, effective December 31, 2022.
-
Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, the following fees imposed pursuant to this section are waived for twelve months following December 7, 2020:
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1033, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (3)(a)(V) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 14, § 23, effective January 31; IP(1) and (2) amended, (SB 19-241), ch. 390, p. 3479, § 63, effective August 2. L. 2020: (3)(a)(XVII) amended and (3)(a)(XVIII) added, (SB 20-086), ch. 67, p. 270, § 2, effective September 14. L. 2020 1st Ex. Sess.: (6) added, (SB 20B-001), ch. 2, p. 16, § 7, effective December 7. L. 2021: (3)(a)(XVII) and (3)(a)(XVIII) amended and (3)(a)(XIX) added, (HB 21-1027), ch. 290, p. 1716, § 4, effective June 22.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-501 as it existed prior to 2018.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 20B-001, see section 1 of chapter 2, Session Laws of Colorado 2020, First Extraordinary Session.
44-3-502. Fees and taxes - allocation.
-
- All state license fees and taxes provided for by this article 3 and all fees provided for by section 44-3-501 (3) and (4) for processing applications, reports, and notices shall be paid to the department, which shall transmit the fees and taxes to the state treasurer. The state treasurer shall credit eighty-five percent of the fees and taxes to the old age pension fund and the balance to the general fund.
- An amount equal to the revenues attributable to fifty dollars of each state license fee provided for by this article 3 and the processing fees provided for by section 44-3-501 (3) and (4) for processing applications, reports, and notices shall be transferred out of the general fund to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund. The transfer shall be made by the state treasurer as soon as possible after the twentieth day of the month following the payment of such fees.
- The expenditures of the state licensing authority and the liquor enforcement division shall be paid out of appropriations from the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund as provided in section 44-6-101.
- Eighty-five percent of the local license fees shall be paid to the department, which shall transmit the fees to the state treasurer to be credited to the old age pension fund.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1037, § 2, effective October 1; (1)(c) amended, (HB 18-1026), ch. 24, p. 281, § 5, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-502 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (1)(c) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-502 (1)(c) in HB 18-1026. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "Antitrust", see 55 Den. L.J. 415 (1978).
44-3-503. Excise tax - records - rules - definition.
-
- An excise tax at the rate of 8.0 cents per gallon, or the same per unit volume tax applied to metric measure, on all malt liquors and hard cider, 7.33 cents per liter on all vinous liquors except hard cider, and 60.26 cents per liter on all spirituous liquors is imposed, and the taxes shall be collected on all such respective beverages, not otherwise exempt from the tax, sold, offered for sale, or used in this state; except that, upon the same beverages, only one such tax shall be paid in this state. The manufacturer thereof, the holder of a winery direct shipper's permit, or the first licensee receiving alcohol beverages in this state if shipped from without the state, shall be primarily liable for the payment of any tax or tax surcharge imposed pursuant to this section; but, if the beverage is transported by a manufacturer or wholesaler to a point outside of the state and disposed of there, then the manufacturer or wholesaler, upon the filing with the state licensing authority of a duplicate bill of lading, invoice, or affidavit showing such transaction, shall not be subject to the tax provided in this section on such beverages, and, if such tax has already been paid, it shall be refunded to said manufacturer or wholesaler. For purposes of this section, "manufacturer" includes brew pub, distillery pub, and vintner's restaurant licensees.
- The department shall promulgate rules concerning the excise tax applied to powdered alcohol at 60.26 cents per liter for the amount of liters of water suggested to be added by the manufacturer's packaging.
-
- Effective July 1, 2000, a wine development fee at the rate of 1.0 cent per liter is imposed on all vinous liquors except hard cider sold, offered for sale, or used in this state. An amount equal to one hundred percent of the wine development fee collected pursuant to this subsection (1)(c)(I) shall be transferred from the general fund to the Colorado wine industry development fund created in section 35-29.5-105. Such transfers shall be made by the state treasurer as soon as possible after the twentieth day of the month following the collection of such wine development fee.
- In addition to the excise tax imposed pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section, an additional excise tax surcharge at the rate of 5.0 cents per liter for the first nine thousand liters, 3.0 cents per liter for the next thirty-six thousand liters, and 1.0 cent per liter for all additional amounts, is imposed on all vinous liquors except hard cider produced by Colorado licensed wineries and sold, offered for sale, or used in this state. An amount equal to one hundred percent of the excise tax surcharge collected pursuant to this subsection (1)(c)(II) shall be transferred from the general fund to the Colorado wine industry development fund created in section 35-29.5-105. Such transfers shall be made by the state treasurer as soon as possible after the twentieth day of the month following the collection of such excise tax surcharge.
-
- An excise tax of ten dollars per ton of grapes is imposed upon all grapes of the vinifera varieties or other produce used in the production of wine in this state by a licensed Colorado winery or vintner's restaurant, whether true or hybrid. The excise tax imposed pursuant to this subsection (1)(d) shall be paid to the department by the licensed winery or vintner's restaurant at the time of purchase of the product by the winery or vintner's restaurant or of importation of the product, whichever is later. An amount equal to one hundred percent of such excise tax shall be transferred from the general fund to the Colorado wine industry development fund created in section 35-29.5-105. Such transfers shall be made by the state treasurer as soon as possible after the twentieth day of the month following the collection of such excise tax.
- The excise tax imposed in accordance with this subsection (1)(d) does not apply to produce used in the production of hard cider.
- The policy of this state is that alcoholics and intoxicated persons may not be subjected to criminal prosecution because of their consumption of alcohol beverages, but rather should be afforded a continuum of treatment in order that they may lead normal lives as productive members of society. The general assembly finds that the cost of implementing a statewide treatment plan is greater than originally estimated. By increasing the excise tax on alcohol beverages in Colorado, it is the intent of this general assembly that the increased revenues derived from this subsection (1) be viewed as one of the sources of funding for the future development of alcoholism treatment programs under the statute enacted in 1973 and for the payment of other related direct and indirect costs caused by the consumption of alcohol beverages.
- The state licensing authority shall make and publish such rules to secure and enforce the collection and payment of the tax as it may deem proper if the rules are not inconsistent with the provisions of this article 3.
- Except as provided in subsection (1)(d) of this section, the excise taxes and excise tax surcharges provided for in this section shall be paid to the department upon the filing of the return provided for in subsection (4) of this section and shall be delivered to the department on or before the twentieth day of the month following the month in which such alcohol beverages are first sold in this state. As used in this subsection (3), "first sold" means the sale or disposal that occurs when a licensed wholesaler sells, transfers, or otherwise disposes of a product, when a manufacturer sells to a licensed wholesaler or a consumer, or when a holder of a winery direct shipper's permit ships to a personal consumer in this state.
-
Each licensed manufacturer and wholesaler of alcohol beverages within this state shall file, on or before the twentieth day of each month, an exact, verified return with the state licensing authority showing for the preceding calendar month the quantities of alcohol beverages:
- Constituting the licensee's beginning and ending inventory for the month;
- Manufactured by the licensee in this state;
- Shipped to the licensee from within this state and received by the licensee in this state;
- Shipped to the licensee from outside this state and received by the licensee in this state;
- Sold or disposed of by the licensee to persons or purchasers in this state;
- Sold or disposed of by the licensee to persons or purchasers outside this state, separately indicating those sales or transactions of alcohol beverages to which the excise tax is not applicable; and
- For persons licensed pursuant to section 44-3-402 (3), 44-3-403 (2)(a), or 44-3-417 (1)(b), a separate report of vinous or malt liquors, as applicable, that were manufactured or inventoried in, or transferred from, an alternating proprietor licensed premises.
- Each holder of a winery direct shipper's permit under section 44-3-104 shall file, on or before the twentieth day of each calendar month, an exact, verified return with the state licensing authority showing for the preceding calendar month the quantities of vinous liquor shipped to personal consumers in this state.
- The return, on forms prescribed by the state licensing authority, shall also show the amount of excise tax payable, after allowances for all proper deductions, for alcohol beverages sold by the manufacturer, wholesaler, or holder of a winery direct shipper's permit in this state and shall include any additional information as the state licensing authority may require for the proper administration of this article 3. The payment of the excise tax provided for in this section, in the amount disclosed by the return, shall accompany the return and shall be paid to the department. Each manufacturer, wholesaler, or holder of a winery direct shipper's permit required to file a return shall keep complete and accurate books and records, accounts, and other documents as may be necessary to substantiate the accuracy of his or her return and the amount of excise tax due and shall retain such records for a period of three years.
- The state licensing authority, after public hearing of which the licensee shall have due notice as provided in this article 3, shall suspend or revoke any license or winery direct shipper's permit issued pursuant to this article 3 for a failure to pay any excise tax required by this article 3 and may suspend or revoke the license or permit for a violation of or failure to comply with the rules promulgated by the authority.
- If the excise tax is not paid when due, there shall be added to the amount of the tax as a penalty a sum equivalent to ten percent thereof and, in addition thereto, interest on the tax and a penalty at the rate of one percent a month or fraction of a month from the date the tax became due until paid. Nothing in this section shall be construed to relieve any person otherwise liable from liability for payment of the excise tax.
- The department shall make a refund or allow a credit to the manufacturer, the wholesaler, or the holder of a winery direct shipper's permit, as the case may be, of the amount of the excise tax paid on alcohol beverages sold in this state when, after payment of the excise tax, the alcohol beverages are rendered unsalable by reason of destruction or damage upon submission of evidence satisfactory to the state licensing authority that the excise tax has actually been paid. Such refund or credit shall be made by the department within sixty days after the submission of evidence satisfactory to the department.
-
- In order to economize and to simplify administrative procedures, the state licensing authority may authorize a procedure whereby a manufacturer or wholesaler of alcohol beverages or holder of a winery direct shipper's permit entitled by law to a refund of the tax provided in this section may instead receive a credit against the tax due on other sales by claiming said credit on the next month's return and attaching a duplicate bill of lading, invoice, or affidavit showing such transaction.
- To the extent and so long as federal law precludes this state from collecting its excise tax on vinous and spirituous liquors sold and delivered on ceded federal property, any manufacturer or wholesaler of such liquors making any such sales and deliveries on such federal property within the boundaries of this state may receive a refund of or a credit for the excise tax paid to this state on such liquors.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1037, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (1)(a) and (4)(g) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 14, § 24, effective January 31; (1)(d) amended, (SB 19-142), ch. 421, p. 3686, § 2, effective September 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-503 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "Has the Doctrine of Stare Decisis been Abandoned in Colorado?", see 25 Dicta 91 (1948).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Extent of department of revenue's regulatory power. The general assembly did not intend department of revenue's regulatory power under the liquor code to extend to regulation and taxation of liquor sales occurring outside the state. Frontier Airlines v. Dept. of Rev., 194 Colo. 230, 571 P.2d 1088 (1977).
Amount of excise tax is matter for legislative determination. Springston v. City of Fort Collins, 184 Colo. 126, 518 P.2d 939 (1974).
Applied in Cass v. Colo. Beverage Co., 122 Colo. 101, 220 P.2d 867 (1950).
44-3-504. Lien to secure payment of taxes - exemptions - recovery.
-
- The state of Colorado and the department shall have a lien, to secure the payment of the taxes, penalties, and interest imposed pursuant to section 44-3-503 upon all the assets and property of the wholesaler or manufacturer owing the tax, including the stock in trade, business fixtures, and equipment owned or used by the wholesaler or manufacturer in the conduct of business, as long as a delinquency in the payment of the tax continues. The lien shall be prior to any lien of any kind whatsoever, including existing liens for taxes.
- Any wholesaler and manufacturer or person in possession shall provide a copy of any lease pertaining to the assets and property described in subsection (1)(a) of this section to the department within ten days after seizure by the department of the assets and property. The department shall verify that the lease is bona fide and notify the owner that the lease has been received by the department. The department shall use its best efforts to notify the owner of the real or personal property that might be subject to the lien created in subsection (1)(a) of this section. The real or personal property of an owner who has made a bona fide lease to a wholesaler or manufacturer shall be exempt from the lien created in subsection (1)(a) of this section if the property can reasonably be identified from the lease description or if the lessee is given an option to purchase in the lease and has not exercised the option to become the owner of the property leased. This exemption shall be effective from the date of the execution of the lease. The exemption shall also apply if the lease is recorded with the county clerk and recorder of the county where the property is located or based or a memorandum of the lease is filed with the department on such forms as may be prescribed by the department after the execution of the lease at a cost for the filing of two dollars and fifty cents per document. Motor vehicles that are properly registered in this state, showing the lessor as owner thereof, shall be exempt from the lien created in subsection (1)(a) of this section; except that said lien shall apply to the extent that the lessee has an earned reserve, allowance for depreciation not to exceed fair market value, or similar interest that is or may be credited to the lessee. Where the lessor and lessee are blood relatives or relatives by law or have twenty-five percent or more common ownership, a lease between the lessee and the lessor shall not be considered as bona fide for the purposes of this section.
-
- Any wholesaler or manufacturer who files a return pursuant to section 44-3-503 but who fails to accompany it with payment of the excise tax disclosed on the return shall be sent a notice by the executive director. The notice shall state that the excise tax is due and unpaid and shall state the amount of the tax, penalty, and interest owed pursuant to section 44-3-503. The notice shall be sent by first-class mail and shall be directed to the last address of the wholesaler or manufacturer on file with the department.
-
- If a wholesaler or manufacturer fails to file both the return and the payment required by section 44-3-503, the executive director shall make an estimate, based upon such information as may be available, of the amount of taxes due for the period for which the wholesaler or manufacturer is delinquent and shall add any penalty and interest authorized in section 44-3-503. The executive director shall give the delinquent taxpayer written notice of the estimated tax, penalty, and interest, which notice shall be sent by first-class mail and shall be directed to the last address of the person on file with the department.
- The remedies available to a taxpayer pursuant to article 21 of title 39 shall be available to any wholesaler or manufacturer who seeks to contest the estimated tax, penalty, or interest specified in the notice mailed pursuant to subsection (2)(b)(I) of this section.
- If any taxes, penalties, or interest imposed pursuant to section 44-3-503 are not paid within ten days after the notice is mailed pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the executive director may seek to enforce collection of the unpaid amounts in accordance with the provisions of article 21 of title 39, to the extent that those provisions are not in conflict with or inconsistent with the provisions of this article 3.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1040, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-504 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-505. Local license fees.
-
The applicant shall pay the following license fees to the treasurer of the municipality, city and county, or county where the licensed premises is located annually in advance:
-
- For each retail liquor store license for premises located within any municipality or city and county, one hundred fifty dollars;
- For each retail liquor store license for premises located outside the municipal limits of any municipality or city and county, two hundred fifty dollars;
-
- For each liquor-licensed drugstore license for premises located within any municipality or city and county, one hundred fifty dollars;
- For each liquor-licensed drugstore license for premises located outside the municipal limits of any municipality or city and county, two hundred fifty dollars;
-
- For each beer and wine license for premises located within any municipality or city and county, except as provided in subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section, three hundred twenty-five dollars;
- For each beer and wine license for premises located outside the municipal limits of any municipality or city and county, except as provided in subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section, four hundred twenty-five dollars;
- For each beer and wine license issued to a resort hotel, three hundred seventy-five dollars;
- For each hotel and restaurant license, five hundred dollars;
- For each tavern license, five hundred dollars;
- For each optional premises license, five hundred dollars;
- For each retail gaming tavern license, five hundred dollars;
- For each application for approval of a contract to sell alcohol beverages pursuant to section 44-3-413 (4)(c), three hundred twenty-five dollars;
- For each brew pub, distillery pub, or vintner's restaurant license, five hundred dollars;
- For each club license, two hundred seventy-five dollars;
- For each arts license, two hundred seventy-five dollars;
- For each racetrack license, five hundred dollars;
- For each bed and breakfast permit, twenty-five dollars;
- For each resort-complex-related facility permit, one hundred dollars per related facility, as defined in section 44-3-413 (2)(e);
- For each art gallery permit, twenty-five dollars;
- For each lodging and entertainment license, five hundred dollars;
- For each related facility permit, one hundred dollars per related facility, as defined in section 44-3-413 (3)(f).
-
- No rebate shall be paid by any municipality, city and county, or county of any alcohol beverage license fee paid for any such license issued by it except upon affirmative action by the respective local licensing authority rebating a proportionate amount of such license fee.
- Eighty-five percent of the local license fees provided for in this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 must be paid to the department, which shall transmit said fees to the state treasurer to be credited to the old age pension fund.
-
-
Each application for a license provided for in this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 filed with a local licensing authority must be accompanied by an application fee in an amount determined by the local licensing authority to cover actual and necessary expenses, subject to the following limitations:
-
For a new license, not to exceed the following:
- On or before July 1, 2008, six hundred twenty-five dollars;
- After July 1, 2008, and before July 2, 2009, seven hundred fifty dollars;
- After July 1, 2009, and before July 2, 2010, eight hundred seventy-five dollars;
- After July 2, 2010, one thousand dollars;
-
For a transfer of location or ownership, not to exceed the following for each:
- On or before July 1, 2008, six hundred twenty-five dollars;
- After July 1, 2008, seven hundred fifty dollars;
-
For a renewal of license, not to exceed the following; except that an expired license renewal fee shall not exceed five hundred dollars:
- On or before July 1, 2008, seventy-five dollars;
- After July 1, 2008, one hundred dollars;
- For a new license or renewal application for an art gallery permit, not to exceed one hundred dollars;
- For a transfer of ownership, change of location, and license merger and conversion pursuant to section 44-3-410 (1)(b), not to exceed one thousand dollars.
-
For a new license, not to exceed the following:
- No fees or charges of any kind, except as provided in this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, may be charged by the local licensing authority to the license holder or applicant for the purposes of granting or renewing a license or transferring ownership or location of a license.
-
Each application for a license provided for in this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 filed with a local licensing authority must be accompanied by an application fee in an amount determined by the local licensing authority to cover actual and necessary expenses, subject to the following limitations:
- The local licensing authority may charge corporate applicants and limited liability companies up to one hundred dollars for the cost of each fingerprint analysis and background investigation undertaken to qualify new officers, directors, stockholders, members, or managers pursuant to the requirements of section 44-3-307 (1); however, no local licensing authority shall collect such a fee if the applicant has already undergone a background investigation by and paid a fee to the state licensing authority.
- The local licensing authority may charge a fee to approve the attachment to a communal outdoor dining area or for modification of a licensed premises to include a communal outdoor dining area. The local licensing authority shall set the fee in an amount to cover the direct and indirect costs of administering the approval.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1042, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2021: (6) added, (HB 21-1027), ch. 290, p. 1716, § 5, effective June 22.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-505 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "Antitrust", see 55 Den. L.J. 415 (1978).
PART 6 DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
44-3-601. Suspension - revocation - fines - rules.
-
- Subject to subsection (8) of this section, in addition to any other penalties prescribed by this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44, the state or any local licensing authority has the power, on its own motion or on complaint, after investigation and public hearing at which the licensee shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard, to fine a licensee or to suspend or revoke, in whole or in part, any license or permit issued by such authority for any violation by the licensee or by any of the agents, servants, or employees of the licensee of this article 3; any rules authorized by this article 3; or any of the terms, conditions, or provisions of the license or permit issued by such authority. A licensing authority may impose a fine pursuant to this subsection (1) regardless of whether a licensee has petitioned the licensing authority pursuant to subsection (3)(a) of this section for permission to pay a fine in lieu of license or permit suspension, and the licensing authority need not make the findings specified in subsections (3)(a)(I) and (3)(a)(II) of this section.
- Any licensing authority has the power to administer oaths and issue subpoenas to require the presence of persons and the production of papers, books, and records necessary to the determination of any hearing that the licensing authority is authorized to conduct.
- For the purposes of imposing a fine, the state licensing authority shall adopt rules establishing categories of violations by level of severity and associated ranges of penalties for state and local licensing authorities, including aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining penalties. A fine imposed pursuant to this subsection (1) must be between five hundred and one hundred thousand dollars; except that penalties for a first violation that is in the least severe level of license violations established pursuant to this subsection (1)(c) must not exceed five thousand dollars.
- Notice of suspension or revocation, as well as any required notice of such hearing, shall be given by mailing the same in writing to the licensee at the address contained in the license or permit. No such suspension shall be for a longer period than six months. If any license or permit is suspended or revoked, no part of the fees paid therefor shall be returned to the licensee. Any license or permit may be summarily suspended by the issuing licensing authority without notice pending any prosecution, investigation, or public hearing. Nothing in this section shall prevent the summary suspension of a license or permit for a temporary period of not more than fifteen days.
-
-
Whenever a decision of the state or any local licensing authority suspending a license or permit becomes final, whether by failure of the licensee to appeal the decision or by exhaustion of all appeals and judicial review, the licensee may, before the operative date of the suspension, petition for permission to pay a fine in lieu of the license or permit suspension for all or part of the suspension period. Upon the receipt of the petition, the state or the local licensing authority may, in its sole discretion, stay the proposed suspension and cause any investigation to be made that it deems desirable and may, in its sole discretion, grant the petition if it is satisfied that:
- The public welfare and morals would not be impaired by permitting the licensee to operate during the period set for suspension and that the payment of the fine will achieve the desired disciplinary purposes; and
- The books and records of the licensee are kept in such a manner that the loss of sales of alcohol beverages that the licensee would have suffered had the suspension gone into effect can be determined with reasonable accuracy.
- Subject to subsection (8) of this section, the fine accepted by the licensee pursuant to subsection (3)(a) of this section shall be equivalent to twenty percent of the licensee's estimated gross revenues from sales of alcohol beverages during the period of the proposed suspension; except that the fine must be between five hundred and one hundred thousand dollars.
- Repealed.
(3.5) The method of payment of any fine pursuant to subsection (1) or (3) of this section:
- To a local licensing authority shall be in the form of cash or in the form of a certified check or cashier's check made payable to the local licensing authority;
- To the state licensing authority shall be in the form determined by the state licensing authority by rule.
-
Whenever a decision of the state or any local licensing authority suspending a license or permit becomes final, whether by failure of the licensee to appeal the decision or by exhaustion of all appeals and judicial review, the licensee may, before the operative date of the suspension, petition for permission to pay a fine in lieu of the license or permit suspension for all or part of the suspension period. Upon the receipt of the petition, the state or the local licensing authority may, in its sole discretion, stay the proposed suspension and cause any investigation to be made that it deems desirable and may, in its sole discretion, grant the petition if it is satisfied that:
- Upon payment of the fine pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, the state or the local licensing authority shall enter its further order permanently staying the imposition of the suspension. If the fine is paid to a local licensing authority, the governing body of the authority shall cause such money to be paid into the general fund of the local licensing authority. Fines paid to the state licensing authority pursuant to subsection (3) of this section shall be transmitted to the state treasurer who shall credit the same to the general fund.
- In connection with any petition pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, the authority of the state or local licensing authority is limited to the granting of such stays as are necessary for it to complete its investigation and make its findings and, if it makes such findings, to the granting of an order permanently staying the imposition of the entire suspension or that portion of the suspension not otherwise conditionally stayed.
- If the state or the local licensing authority does not make the findings required in subsection (3)(a) of this section and does not order the suspension permanently stayed, the suspension shall go into effect on the operative date finally set by the state or the local licensing authority.
- The provisions of subsections (3) to (6) of this section shall be effective and may be implemented by the state licensing authority upon its decision to accept and adopt the optional procedures set forth in said subsections. The provisions of subsections (3) to (6) of this section shall be effective and may be implemented by a local licensing authority only after the governing body of the municipality, the governing body of the city and county, or the board of county commissioners of the county chooses to do so and acts, by appropriate resolution or ordinance, to accept and adopt the optional procedures set forth in said subsections. Any such actions may be revoked in a similar manner.
-
-
The following applies only if the licensing authority has decided to impose a suspension for a violation of section 44-3-901 (1)(a), (1)(b), or (6)(a)(I) that occurs in a sales room for a licensee operating pursuant to section 44-3-402 (2) or (7), 44-3-403 (2)(c), or 44-3-407 (1)(b):
- If the licensing authority decides to accept a fine in lieu of a license suspension, the licensing authority shall only include in the computation of the fine the estimated gross revenues of the retail sales of the sales room where the violation occurred, and not any manufacturing or wholesale activities of the licensee; except that the fine must be between two hundred and five thousand dollars; and
- If the licensing authority declines to accept a fine, it shall limit any suspension to the designated premises for the sales room where the violation occurred, and not any manufacturing or wholesale activities of the licensee. In the case of a temporary sales room for not more than three consecutive days, the licensing authority shall apply a suspension issued in accordance with this section only to future temporary sales rooms and not any manufacturing or wholesale activities of the licensee.
-
The following applies only if the licensing authority has decided to impose a suspension for a violation of section 44-3-901 (1)(a), (1)(b), or (6)(a)(I) that occurs in a retail establishment for licensees operating pursuant to section 44-3-417, 44-3-422, or 44-3-426:
- If the licensing authority decides to accept a fine in lieu of a license suspension, the licensing authority shall only include in the computation of the fine the estimated gross revenues of the retail activities of the licensee, and not any manufacturing or wholesale activities of the licensee; except that the fine must be between two hundred and five thousand dollars; and
- If the licensing authority declines to accept a fine, it shall limit any suspension to the retail activities of the licensee, and not any manufacturing or wholesale activities of the licensee.
- When imposing a suspension or fine against a retail establishment licensed under section 44-4-107 (1) or this article 3 for a violation of section 44-3-901 (6)(a)(I), the licensing authority shall not take into consideration any violation of section 44-3-901 (6)(a)(I) by the licensee that occurred more than five years before the date on which the violation for which the suspension or fine is being imposed occurred.
-
The following applies only if the licensing authority has decided to impose a suspension for a violation of section 44-3-901 (1)(a), (1)(b), or (6)(a)(I) that occurs in a sales room for a licensee operating pursuant to section 44-3-402 (2) or (7), 44-3-403 (2)(c), or 44-3-407 (1)(b):
- When penalizing a vendor who has violated provisions of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 that prohibit the service of an alcohol beverage to a minor or a visibly intoxicated person, state and local licensing authorities shall consider it a mitigating factor if the vendor is a responsible alcohol beverage vendor as defined by part 10 of this article 3. In addition, the state licensing authority by rule may include other violations of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 that licensing authorities shall consider for mitigation if the vendor qualifies as a responsible alcohol beverage vendor.
Source: L. 2018: (8)(c) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2205, § 10, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1044, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: (1) and (3)(b) amended, (3)(c) repealed, and (3.5) added, (SB 20-110), ch. 290, p. 1434, § 1, effective July 13.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-601 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (8)(c) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-601 (7.5)(c) in SB 18-243. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Due process standard applicable. The test of whether a liquor licensee's procedural due process rights have been violated is one of "fundamental fairness". Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
The holder of a liquor license has sufficient interest therein to require procedural due process protection. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
Promulgation of rules is not necessary to ensure due process rights for a license suspension under this section because judicial review adequately protects those rights. Brownlee v. Dept. of Rev., 686 P.2d 1372 (Colo. App. 1984).
This section is constitutional on its face when a hearing is provided as soon as possible within the 15-day limitation set out in the statute. New Safari Lounge, Inc. v. City of Colo. Springs, 193 Colo. 428, 567 P.2d 372 (1977).
This section prescribes procedures to revoke a license to sell intoxicating liquors with an alcoholic content in excess of 3.2 percent. Bunzel v. City of Golden, 151 Colo. 352, 378 P.2d 208 (1963).
This section has no application to a license to sell 3.2 percent beer. Bunzel v. City of Golden, 151 Colo. 352, 378 P.2d 208 (1963).
Though not technically property, a liquor license is a valuable right and possesses some of the characteristics of property, and it may be revoked for breach of the conditions upon which it was issued. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
A liquor license can be recalled with all other similar licenses during the year only by legislative action, otherwise, it is revocable during the year only for breach of the conditions upon which it was issued, and as thus viewed, it is property within the meaning of the due process clause of the federal constitution. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Boards of county commissioners have power to revoke licenses to sell intoxicating liquors whenever the board is satisfied that the licensee has abused the privilege of the license or violated the general law, and for the purpose of determining whether or not a license should be revoked the board may hear evidence and determine for itself whether or not the law has been violated and it is not necessary that the licensee should first have been tried and proven guilty of violating the law in a court of competent jurisdiction before his license can be revoked. Bd. of C ounty C omm'rs v. Mayr, 31 Colo. 173, 74 P. 458 (1903) (decided prior to earliest source, L. 35, p. 612, § 10).
Basis for revocation. Licenses may be revoked by the licensing authority, after notice and hearing, for any violation by the licensee or by any of the agents, servants, or employees of such licensee of the provisions of this article, or any of the rules or regulations authorized hereunder, or of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the license issued by such authority. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Sanctions criteria set forth in this section do not govern a decision not to renew under § 12-47-302 (1). Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
Licensee presumed to know regulations. Having applied for and received a license pursuant to the state liquor code, a licensee is presumed to know the regulations governing use of that license. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
The test of the sufficiency of notice is whether charges are described with reasonable certainty so that licensee can prepare a defense. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
This section does not require in a county license suspension hearing that the notice of hearing identify the specific statute or regulation that the licensee is alleged to have violated. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
Governed by liquor code on local level. Since the general assembly has not adopted legislation requiring that license suspension proceedings by a county be conducted pursuant to the state administrative procedure act and since a county does not have statewide jurisdiction, the notice requirements, suspension of a liquor license, are governed by the state liquor code. Chroma Corp. v. County of Adams, 36 Colo. App. 345, 543 P.2d 83 (1975).
Director could move court to release documents in custodia legis. Where director initiated proceedings to determine possible revocation or suspension of license, but the district court had possession of the necessary documents for use by the grand jury, and the district court could not be subpoenaed, the director could properly move, in the alternative, for the court to release the documents in custodia legis. Granbery v. District Court, 187 Colo. 316, 531 P.2d 390 (1975).
License suspended for sale of wine to minor. DiManna v. Kalbin, 646 P.2d 403 (Colo. App. 1982).
Forty-five days suspension for gambling is reasonable for a violation of § 12-47-128 (5)(n). Brownlee v. Dept. of Rev., 686 P.2d 1372 (Colo. App. 1984).
Applied in Continental Liquor Co. v. Kalbin, 43 Colo. App. 438, 608 P.2d 353 (1977); Chroma Corp. v. Campbell, 44 Colo. App. 387, 619 P.2d 74 (1980).
PART 7 INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
44-3-701. Inspection procedures.
Each licensee shall keep a complete set of books of account, invoices, copies of orders, shipping instructions, bills of lading, weigh bills, correspondence, and all other records necessary to show fully the business transactions of such licensee, all of which shall be open at all times during business hours for the inspection and examination of the state licensing authority or its duly authorized representatives. The state licensing authority may require any licensee to furnish such information as it considers necessary for the proper administration of this article 3, and may require an audit to be made of the books of account and records on any occasions as it may consider necessary by an auditor to be selected by the state licensing authority, who shall likewise have access to all books and records of the licensee, and the expense thereof shall be paid by the licensee.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1047, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-701 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include a case decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Director has authority to issue subpoenas compelling production of documents. Granbery v. District Court, 187 Colo. 316, 531 P.2d 390 (1975).
Director could move court to release documents in custodia legis. Where director initiated proceedings to determine possible revocation or suspension of license, but the district court had possession of the necessary documents for use by the grand jury, and the district court could not be subpoenaed, the director could properly move, in the alternative, for the court to release the documents in custodia legis. Granbery v. District Court, 187 Colo. 316, 531 P.2d 390 (1975).
PART 8 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CIVIL LIABILITY
44-3-801. Civil liability - legislative declaration - definitions.
- The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that this section shall be interpreted so that any common law cause of action against a vendor of alcohol beverages is abolished and that in certain cases the consumption of alcohol beverages rather than the sale, service, or provision thereof is the proximate cause of injuries or damages inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person, except as otherwise provided in this section.
- As used in this section, "licensee" means a person licensed under the provisions of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 and the agents or servants of the person.
-
-
No licensee is civilly liable to any injured individual or his or her estate for any injury to the individual or damage to any property suffered because of the intoxication of any person due to the sale or service of any alcohol beverage to the person, except when:
- It is proven that the licensee willfully and knowingly sold or served any alcohol beverage to the person who was under the age of twenty-one years or who was visibly intoxicated; and
- The civil action is commenced within one year after the sale or service.
- No civil action may be brought pursuant to this subsection (3) by the person to whom the alcohol beverage was sold or served or by his or her estate, legal guardian, or dependent.
- In any civil action brought pursuant to this subsection (3), the total liability in any such action shall not exceed one hundred fifty thousand dollars.
-
No licensee is civilly liable to any injured individual or his or her estate for any injury to the individual or damage to any property suffered because of the intoxication of any person due to the sale or service of any alcohol beverage to the person, except when:
-
-
No social host who furnishes any alcohol beverage is civilly liable to any injured individual or his or her estate for any injury to the individual or damage to any property suffered, including any action for wrongful death, because of the intoxication of any person due to the consumption of such alcohol beverages, except when:
- It is proven that the social host knowingly served any alcohol beverage to the person who was under the age of twenty-one years or knowingly provided the person under the age of twenty-one a place to consume an alcoholic beverage; and
- The civil action is commenced within one year after the service.
- No civil action may be brought pursuant to this subsection (4) by the person to whom the alcohol beverage was served or by his or her estate, legal guardian, or dependent.
- The total liability in any such action shall not exceed one hundred fifty thousand dollars.
-
No social host who furnishes any alcohol beverage is civilly liable to any injured individual or his or her estate for any injury to the individual or damage to any property suffered, including any action for wrongful death, because of the intoxication of any person due to the consumption of such alcohol beverages, except when:
- An instructor or entity that complies with section 18-13-122 (5)(c) shall not be liable for civil damages resulting from the intoxication of a minor due to the minor's unauthorized consumption of alcohol beverages during instruction in culinary arts, food service, or restaurant management pursuant to section 18-13-122 (5)(c).
-
- The limitations on damages set forth in subsections (3)(c) and (4)(c) of this section must be adjusted for inflation as of January 1, 1998, January 1, 2008, January 1, 2020, and each January 1 every two years thereafter. The adjustments made on January 1, 1998, January 1, 2008, January 1, 2020, and each January 1 every two years thereafter must be based on the cumulative annual adjustment for inflation for each year since the effective date of the damages limitations in subsections (3)(c) and (4)(c) of this section. The adjustments made pursuant to this subsection (6)(a) must be rounded upward or downward to the nearest ten-dollar increment.
- As used in this subsection (6), "inflation" means the annual percentage change in the United States department of labor, bureau of labor statistics, consumer price index for Denver-Boulder, all items, all urban consumers, or its successor index.
-
The secretary of state shall certify the adjusted limitation on damages within fourteen days after the appropriate information is available, and:
- The adjusted limitation on damages as of January 1, 1998, is applicable to all claims for relief that accrue on or after January 1, 1998, and before January 1, 2008;
- The adjusted limitation on damages as of January 1, 2008, is applicable to all claims for relief that accrue on and after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2020; and
- The adjusted limitation on damages as of January 1, 2020, and each January 1 every two years thereafter is applicable to all claims for relief that accrue on and after the specified January 1 and before the January 1 two years thereafter.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1047, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (6)(a) and (6)(c) amended, (SB 19-109), ch. 83, p. 295, § 1, effective August 2.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-801 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "What's in the Package: Food, Beverage, and Dietary Supplement Law and Litigation Part I", see 43 C olo. Law. 77 (July 2014). For article, "Negligent Entrustment of Guns and Other Dangerous Instrumentalities", see 47 C olo. Law. 46 (June 2018).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
The plain language of subsection (4)(a)(I) requires that a social host must knowingly provide the person under the age of twenty-one a place to consume alcohol. This section does not impose liability on a social host who provides a venue but does not have knowledge that specific underage persons are drinking at the venue. Przekurat v. Torres, 2016 COA 177, 488 P.3d 125, aff'd, 2018 CO 69, 428 P.3d 512.
Employer that made alcohol beverages available to an employee on its premises after work hours was acting as a social host and not liable for injuries sustained by third parties as a result of the employee's operation of a motor vehicle after consuming the alcohol beverages. Rojas v. Engineered Plastic Designs, Inc., 68 P.3d 591 (Colo. App. 2003).
Employer is a "social host" within the meaning of this act and is protected from liability for injuries caused by its guest even though it did not furnish alcohol to anyone at a party on its premises. Shielding a party host who directly supplies alcohol from liability while not protecting the seemingly less-culpable host who does not, even if both do not prevent drinking, would be contrary not only to logic and common sense, but to the stated purpose of the act, which is to shift the responsibility for drinking alcohol from the vendor or provider to the consumer of alcohol beverages. McCray v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 437 F. Supp. 3d 907 (D. Colo. 2020).
A victim need not show his or her injuries were a reasonable foreseeable consequence of licensed alcohol vendor serving a visibly intoxicated person. It suffices that the vendor's improper service of alcohol caused the patron's intoxication and patron's intoxication caused the victim's injuries. Strauch v. Build It, 226 P.3d 1235 (Colo. App. 2009), aff'd, 253 P.3d 302 (Colo. 2011).
This section does not protect defendant from liability for negligence because defendant did not sell, serve, or otherwise provide alcohol to plaintiff or her companions. Westin Operator, LLC v. Groh, 2015 CO 25, 347 P.3d 606.
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-112.5.
Law reviews. For comment, " C respin v. Largo C orporation and the Legislative Response: The Turbulent State of Dram Shop Liability in Colorado", see 57 U. Colo., L. Rev. 419 (1986). For article, "1986 Colorado Tort Reform Legislation", see 15 Colo. Law. 1363 (1986). For article, "1988 Update on Colorado Tort Reform Legislation -- Part II", see 17 Colo. Law. 1949 (1988). For article, "Recovery of Interest: Part I -- Personal Injury", see 18 Colo. Law. 1063 (1989).
This section is not intended to apply retrospectively and does not apply to claims which accrued prior to its effective date. Jenkins v. Wine & Dine, Inc., 784 P.2d 854 (Colo. App. 1989).
One-year statute of limitation period within which to file a claim under this section is not unreasonably limited in duration. Estate of Stevenson v. Hollywood Bar, 832 P.2d 718 (Colo. 1992).
One-year limitation period established by this section is constitutional. Estate of Stevenson v. Hollywood Bar, 832 P.2d 718 (Colo. 1992).
"Willfully and knowingly served" as used in subsection (3)(a)(I) occurs only when a social host has control over or takes an active part in supplying a minor with alcohol. Providing a home at which alcohol is consumed by minors, without more, does not create social host liability. Forrest v. Lorrigan, 833 P.2d 873 (Colo. App. 1992).
The fact that the host collected money for the purchase of beer was not enough to permit a finding of social host liability, absent evidence that he also bought or exercised control over the beer. Forrest v. Lorrigan, 833 P.2d 873 (Colo. App. 1992).
Social host liability for injuries to third party under this section not established where parent provided home where minors could consume alcoholic beverages and helped collect money to purchase alcoholic beverages unless it could be shown that parent willfully and knowingly served alcoholic beverages to minors. Forrest v. Lorrigan, 833 P.2d 873 (Colo. App. 1992).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-47-128.5.
Law reviews. For comment, " C respin v. Largo C orporation and the Legislative Response: The Turbulent State of Dram Shop Liability in Colorado", see 57 U. Colo. L. Rev. 419 (1986). For article, "1986 Colorado Tort Reform Legislation", see 15 Colo. Law. 1363 (1986). For article, "Recovery of Interest: Part I -- Personal Injury", see 18 Colo. Law. 1063 (1989).
This statute found constitutional in that it does not violate due process by being unconstitutionally vague, does not violate equal protection rights of heirs of intoxicated person because the statute is rationally related to the legitimate state purpose of preventing negligence by consumers of alcohol, does not unconstitutionally limit access to courts, and is not constitutionally-prohibited special legislation. Sigman v. Seafood Ltd. P'ship I, 817 P.2d 527 (Colo. 1991).
Subsection (4) does not deny equal protection. The classification is based on a previously established distinction between minors and adults with respect to alcohol consumption and the state has a legitimate interest in deterring alcohol-related injuries caused by minors. Charlton v. Kimata, 815 P.2d 946 (Colo. 1991).
Under the plain language of this section, a licensee may be held civilly liable only if the licensee knows that he or she is serving alcohol to a person under twenty-one years of age and willfully does so. Dickman v. Jackalope, Inc., 870 P.2d 1261 (Colo. App. 1994).
The terms "willfully and knowingly" in this section apply both to the words "sold or served" and to the phrase "to such person who was under the age of twenty-one years", and a different interpretation would render the "willful and knowing" language meaningless since it is difficult to imagine any sales or service of alcohol by a licensee which are not deliberate. Dickman v. Jackalope, Inc., 870 P.2d 1261 (Colo. App. 1994).
Whether a licensee "willfully and knowingly" sold or served alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person is generally a question of fact which may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence. Christoph v. Colo. Comm. Corp., 946 P.2d 519 (Colo. App. 1997).
The addition of the words "willfully and knowingly" to this section relating to imposition of civil liability, together with the fact that the civil liability section does not include the good-faith defense contained in § 12-47-128 (5)(a)(I), buttresses the conclusion that the general assembly did not intend that this be a strict liability provision, but rather one requiring a plaintiff to prove knowledge and intention on the part of the vendor. Dickman v. Jackalope, Inc., 870 P.2d 1261 (Colo. App. 1994).
Heirs of fatally injured intoxicated person may not maintain wrongful death action against vendor of alcoholic beverages because this statute abolishes such actions by the consumers of alcohol and the wrongful death statute permits heirs to maintain such actions only if the deceased could have done so had the deceased's injuries not been fatal. Sigman v. Seafood Ltd. P'ship I, 817 P.2d 527 (Colo. 1991).
One-year statute of limitation period within which to file a claim under this section is not unreasonably limited in duration. Estate of Stevenson v. Hollywood Bar, 832 P.2d 718 (Colo. 1992).
Social host liability for injuries to third party under this section not established where parent provided home where minors could consume alcoholic beverages and helped collect money to purchase alcoholic beverages unless it could be shown that parent willfully and knowingly served alcoholic beverages to minors. Forrest v. Lorrigan, 833 P.2d 873 (Colo. App. 1992).
Section imposes no duty on employer who is neither an innkeeper nor a social host to prevent an employee from becoming intoxicated at work where employer did not know employee had consumed, on the day in question or at any other time, wine employer kept for business purposes nor was employer aware if employee had a history of alcohol-related problems. Biel v. Alcott, 876 P.2d 60 (Colo. App. 1993).
Trial court did not err in determining that two plaintiffs' combined recovery against two separate establishments was limited to $150,000. This section describes the civil action as one in which a single licensee is civilly liable to an injured individual. If the statute required plaintiffs to maintain separate actions against each licensee, each plaintiff would have been required to file separate actions against both licensees, a waste of judicial resources not intended by the general assembly. Brown v. Hollywood Bar and Cafe, 942 P.2d 1363 (Colo. App. 1997).
Plaintiff entitled to interest and costs insofar as those amounts exceed the statutory cap. This section makes clear that the total liability is specified for any injury to an individual, thus only damages for the injury are covered by the statutory cap. Brown v. Hollywood Bar and Cafe, 942 P.2d 1363 (Colo. App. 1997).
44-3-802. Judicial review.
Any person applying to the courts for a review of the state or any local licensing authority's decision shall apply for review within thirty days after the date of decision of refusal by a local licensing authority or, in the case of approval by a local licensing authority, within thirty days after the date of decision by the state licensing authority and shall be required to pay the cost of preparing a transcript of proceedings before the licensing authority when a transcript is demanded by the person taking the appeal or when a transcript is furnished by the licensing authority pursuant to court order.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1049, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-802 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-118.
No unbridled authority. Licensing authority's power to act is not a completely unbridled one because their action is subject to judicial review. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Nat'l Tea Co., 149 Colo. 80, 367 P.2d 909 (1962).
Three principles of review pervade all pertinent decisions of the supreme court: (1) The licensing authorities are vested with a very wide discretion; (2) all reasonable doubts as to the correctness of the board's rulings are to be resolved in favor of the board; (3) the determination of the board will not be disturbed by the courts unless it appears that the board has "abused its discretion". La Junta Easy Shops, Inc. v. Hendren, 164 Colo. 55, 432 P.2d 754 (1967); Kerr v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 170 Colo. 227, 460 P.2d 235 (1969).
A reviewing court is concerned only with the question of whether the decision of the licensing authority was supported by competent evidence, and not whether the trial court or the reviewing court would have arrived at a different conclusion were they the licensing authority. City of Manitou Springs v. Walk, 149 Colo. 43, 367 P.2d 744 (1961).
Abuse of discretion grounds for disturbing determination. The determination of the board of county commissioners will not be disturbed by the courts unless it appears that the board has abused its discretion. Bailey v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 151 Colo. 115, 376 P.2d 519 (1962).
Arbitrary and capricious refusal basis for order to issue license. Since the licensing authority's rulings are subject to review by the courts, if its action in refusing to grant a license is found to be arbitrary or capricious, then a court has the authority, and the duty, to order the license to issue. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957); Adams County Golf, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 199 Colo. 423, 610 P.2d 97 (1980).
Findings of fact sufficient for review. It is not required that the licensing authority make findings of fact equivalent to that of a trial court, but they must be sufficient to furnish a basis for judicial review if the statutory requirements are to be fulfilled. Le Pore v. Larkin, 146 Colo. 311, 361 P.2d 343 (1961).
Findings of fact should be sufficient in content to apprise the parties and a reviewing court of the factual basis of an action of the administrative agency, so that the parties and the reviewing tribunal may determine whether the decision has support in the evidence and in the law. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957).
Reversal because of imperfect and contradictory findings. Where the findings and determination of the board are so imperfect and contradictory as to preclude a trial court from basing a considered judgment thereon, the supreme court, being in no better position than a trial judge, has but one course to pursue, reversal. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Salardino, 136 Colo. 421, 318 P.2d 596 (1957).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-47-141.
Special proceedings. The proceedings provided for reviewing the action of the state licensing authority in refusing a license is a special proceeding, and is subject to, and controlled by, the special provisions, if any, contained in this section and article. Saunders v. Norton, 98 Colo. 537, 58 P.2d 482 (1936).
If the local licensing authority denies the license, appeal therefrom to the district court would lie because the state alone could not authorize the issuance. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
Such review predicated on exhaustion of administrative remedies. Before one protesting issuance of a license may seek review in the district court, he must first exhaust his administrative remedies before the state licensing authority. Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
Evidence before authority and arbitrary and capricious nature of action subject to review. The question before the supreme court is not as to whether there was any evidence to support the decision of the trial court, but rather whether there was any evidence to support the decision of the licensing authority, or whether he acted arbitrarily and capriciously. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
The findings and conclusions of the licensing authority should not be too uncertain for judicial interpretation, and administrative hearings should be decided according to the evidence and the law. Geer v. Presto, 135 Colo. 536, 313 P.2d 980 (1957).
Even where the final order rests in whole or in part upon judicial notice of facts, specific findings must appear in sufficient detail to enable the court on appeal to determine whether proper limits, in supplementing the testimony by judicial knowledge, have been observed. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
A determination on review cannot be made unless the basis for denial is disclosed, and if the court fails to require disclosure it cannot properly perform its function of review, and thereby the statute is circumvented. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
Basis must appear on record for review. When a court is called upon to review the action of an administrative agency, it should be placed in the same position as such agency, and if the administrative agency has knowledge of some fact and acts upon such knowledge, the agency should see to it that what it knows becomes part of the record in order to permit the reviewing court to evaluate the matter so known, only then can the court be in the same position as the agency in a consideration of the problem successively confronting agency and court. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
In a proceeding to review the granting of a liquor license, the reviewing court is limited to the proceedings before the licensing officer, and it is error to consider matters outside the record and for the trial court to substitute its judgment for that of the licensing officer. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
The reviewing court is only concerned as to whether or not the decision of the licensing authority was supported by competent evidence. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950); Kornfeld v. Yost, 37 Colo. App. 483, 551 P.2d 219 (1976), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Kornfeld v. Perl Mack Liquors, Inc., 193 Colo. 442, 567 P.2d 383 (1977).
The reviewing court may not substitute its opinion for the determination made by the local licensing authority in granting or denying a license, nor interfere with the exercise of its discretion where its action is based on evidence from which reasonable men might draw different conclusions. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
Neither the supreme court nor the trial court may substitute its opinion for the determination made by the local licensing authority in granting or denying a license nor interfere with the exercise of its discretion where its action is based on evidence from which reasonable men might honestly draw different conclusions. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
If there is evidence to support the board's determination, it is the duty of the trial court and it is the duty of the supreme court to affirm the action of the board. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bova, 153 Colo. 230, 385 P.2d 590 (1963).
If there is evidence to support the determination of the board of county commissioners, it is the duty of the trial court to affirm the action of the board. Jennings v. Hoskinson, 152 Colo. 276, 382 P.2d 807 (1963).
All reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the findings of the licensing authority and unless it clearly appears that under the whole record an action of that authority is arbitrary and capricious the supreme court may not order a different result. Gem Beverage Co. v. Geer, 138 Colo. 420, 334 P.2d 744 (1959); Quedens v. J. S. Dillon Co., 146 Colo. 161, 360 P.2d 984 (1961).
Where the courts review the decisions of a licensing authority regarding the issuance of licenses for the sale of spirituous liquors all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950); Lab Dev. Co. v. Hill, 152 Colo. 338, 381 P.2d 811 (1963).
Arbitrary and capricious actions subject to change on review. The various licensing authorities have discretionary power in granting or denying licenses and their actions will not be disturbed on review unless arbitrary or capricious. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bonicelli, 151 Colo. 308, 377 P.2d 124 (1962).
The refusal of a local licensing authority to grant a license may be reviewed by the court, as in the case of a refusal of license by the state licensing authority, by writ of certiorari or otherwise, and if the court having jurisdiction shall determine that such action was capricious or arbitrary it shall order the issuance of the license. MacArthur v. Presto, 122 Colo. 202, 221 P.2d 934 (1950); MacArthur v. Sanzalone, 123 Colo. 166, 225 P.2d 1044 (1950).
Capricious or arbitrary exercise of discretion by an administrative board can arise in only three ways: (a) By neglecting or refusing to use reasonable diligence and care to procure such evidence as it is by law authorized to consider in exercising the discretion vested in it; (b) by failing to give candid and honest consideration of the evidence before it on which it is authorized to act in exercising its discretion; (c) by exercising its discretion in such manner after a consideration of evidence before it as clearly to indicate that its action is based on conclusions from the evidence such that reasonable men fairly and honestly considering the evidence must reach contrary conclusions. Goehring v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 172 Colo. 1, 469 P.2d 137 (1970).
Where there is no showing in the record that a city council has abused its discretion or exceeded its authority in a refusal to grant a liquor license, and it seems to have acted in the premises according to law and its own conception of right and duty, a decree of the district court directing the city council forthwith to issue a liquor license to the plaintiff is wrong. Heuston v. Gilman, 98 Colo. 301, 56 P.2d 40 (1936).
Mandamus. In harmony with the rule that resort may be had to mandamus to compel the exercise of authority or discretion vested in an administrative body or board, courts cannot control or direct how such authority or discretion shall be exercised unless it appears clearly that its action has been capricious or arbitrary. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
Mandamus to compel issuance of license must be brought in county where application was made. See Saunders v. Norton, 98 Colo. 537, 58 P.2d 482 (1936).
The rule ordinarily applicable to writs of error before the supreme court is that the supreme court must approach the facts of a case by constantly keeping in mind the exclusive vantage point of the trial judge in that he was able in the trial to use his eyes, ears, and intelligence to discern wherein was truth, and wherein credit and weight should be given to the testimony of witnesses. Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 309 P.2d 606 (1957).
Granting of license to other applicant while review proceeding. Where a party applied for a liquor license which was denied, a proceeding to review such denial under this section does not operate to stay the hand of the licensing officer in receiving and acting upon the application of another party for a license to operate at the same location. Cronin v. Ward, 144 Colo. 192, 355 P.2d 655 (1960).
Order to republish notice and hold hearing proper. In an action to compel a board of county commissioners to issue a liquor license, where it is shown that the board refuses to issue the license but held no hearing and gave no reasons for such refusal, an order requiring the applicant to republish his notice and directing the board to hold a regular hearing thereon with a court reporter present is proper, since a liquor license cannot be secured by default. Sheeley v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 137 Colo. 350, 325 P.2d 275 (1958).
No court order available to interfere with issuance, etc. Since the statutes give the liquor licensing authority the exclusive jurisdiction in the matter of issuing, transferring, or revocation of a liquor license, the superior court does not have by injunctive proceedings or any other court order, jurisdiction to interfere with the functions of the manager of safety in his capacity as the Denver liquor licensing authority. Hilst v. Bennett, 175 Colo. 78, 485 P.2d 880 (1971).
The actions of the Denver liquor licensing authority are subject to judicial review, but until he has exercised his authority, the courts do not have jurisdiction to interfere with the administrative authority vested in the manager. Hilst v. Bennett, 175 Colo. 78, 485 P.2d 880 (1971).
Competitor may not appeal issuance of license. An operator of a competing liquor store does not have standing to appeal a decision of a local licensing authority granting issuance of a liquor license, either under this section or as a person "substantially aggrieved" by the disposition of a case in the lower court, pursuant to Rule 106, C.R.C.P., since economic injury from lawful competition does not confer standing to question the legality of a competitor's operations. Norris v. Grimsley, 41 Colo. App. 231, 585 P.2d 925 (1978).
PART 9 UNLAWFUL ACTS - ENFORCEMENT
44-3-901. Unlawful acts - exceptions - definitions.
-
Except as provided in section 18-13-122, it is unlawful for any person:
- To sell, serve, give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver, or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of, any alcohol beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or to a known habitual drunkard;
-
- To sell, serve, give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of any alcohol beverage to or for any person under the age of twenty-one years.
-
If a person is convicted of an offense pursuant to subsection (1)(b)(I) of this section for serving, giving away, disposing of, exchanging, or delivering or permitting the serving, giving, or procuring of any alcohol beverage to a person under the age of twenty-one years, the court shall consider the following in mitigation:
- After consuming the alcohol, the underage person was in need of medical assistance as a result of consuming alcohol; and
- Within six hours after the underage person consumed the alcohol, the defendant contacted the police or emergency medical personnel to report that the underage person was in need of medical assistance as a result of consuming alcohol.
- At any time on such premises other than the alcohol beverages purchased from the establishment; or
- In any public room on the licensed premises during hours during which the sale of the alcohol beverage is prohibited under this article 3.
- To obtain or attempt to obtain any alcohol beverage by misrepresentation of age or by any other method in any place where alcohol beverages are sold when a person is under twenty-one years of age;
- To possess alcohol beverages in any store, in any public place, including public streets, alleys, roads, or highways, or upon property owned by the state of Colorado or any subdivision thereof, or inside vehicles while upon the public streets, alleys, roads, or highways when a person is under twenty-one years of age;
- To knowingly, or under conditions that an average parent or guardian should have knowledge of, suffer or permit any person under twenty-one years of age, of whom such person may be a parent or guardian, to violate the provisions of subsection (1)(c) or (1)(d) of this section;
- To buy any vinous or spirituous liquor from any person not licensed to sell at retail as provided by this article 3 except as otherwise provided in this article 3;
- To sell at retail any malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in sealed containers without holding a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore license, except as permitted by section 44-3-107 (2) or 44-3-301 (6)(b) or any other provision of this article 3, or to sell at retail any fermented malt beverages in sealed containers without holding a fermented malt beverage retailer's license under sections 44-4-104 (1)(c) and 44-4-107 (1)(a);
- To manufacture, sell, or possess for sale any alcohol beverage unless licensed to do so as provided by this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 and unless all licenses required are in full force and effect;
-
- To consume any alcohol beverages:
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, a person who is at least twenty-one years of age may consume alcohol beverages while the person is a passenger aboard a luxury limousine or a charter bus, as those terms are defined in section 40-10.1-301. Nothing in this subsection (1)(i)(II) authorizes an owner or operator of a luxury limousine or charter bus to sell or distribute alcohol beverages without obtaining a public transportation system license pursuant to section 44-3-421.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, it shall not be unlawful for adult patrons of a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee to consume malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors on the licensed premises when the consumption is conducted within the limitations of the licensee's license and is part of a tasting if authorization for the tasting has been granted pursuant to section 44-3-301.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, it is not unlawful for adult patrons of an art gallery permittee to consume alcohol beverages on the premises when the consumption is conducted within the limitations of a valid permit granted pursuant to section 44-3-424.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, it is not unlawful for adult patrons of the Colorado state fair to consume malt, vinous, or spirituous liquor upon unlicensed areas within the designated fairgrounds of the Colorado state fair authority or at a licensed premises on the fairgrounds when not purchased at the licensed premises, but this subsection (1)(i)(V) does not authorize a patron to remove an alcohol beverage from the fairgrounds.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, it is not unlawful for adult patrons of a licensed premises that is attached to a common consumption area to consume alcohol beverages upon unlicensed areas within a common consumption area, but this subsection (1)(i)(VI) does not authorize a patron to remove an alcohol beverage from the common consumption area.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section, it is not unlawful for a person who is at least twenty-one years of age to consume any alcohol beverages in any public place, other than a public right of way, where consumption of alcohol beverages has been specifically authorized by ordinance, resolution, or rule adopted by a municipality, city and county, or county or, for purposes of state parks, state wildlife areas, or other properties open to recreation that are under the supervision of the parks and wildlife commission created in article 9 of title 33, by the parks and wildlife commission.
- Notwithstanding subsection (1)(i)(I) of this section and when and where consumption is specifically authorized by an ordinance adopted by the city and county of Denver, it is not unlawful for adult patrons of the national western center to consume malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in unlicensed areas of the national western center or at a licensed premises in the national western center when not purchased at the licensed premises. This subsection (1)(i)(VIII) does not authorize a patron to remove an alcohol beverage from the national western center.
(A) In any public place except on any licensed premises permitted under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 to sell any alcohol beverages by the drink for consumption on the licensed premises;
(B) Upon any premises licensed to sell alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises, the sale of which is not authorized by the state licensing authority;
- To regularly provide premises, or any portion thereof together with soft drinks or other mix, ice, glasses, or containers at a direct or indirect cost or charge to any person who brings alcohol beverages upon the premises for the purpose of consuming the beverages on the premises during the hours in which the sale of such beverages is prohibited or to consume such beverages upon premises operated in the manner described in this subsection (1)(j);
- To possess any package, parcel, or container on which the excise tax has not been paid;
- With knowledge, to permit or fail to prevent the use of his or her identification, including a driver's license, by a person who is under twenty-one years of age, for the unlawful purchase of any alcohol beverage;
- Who is a common carrier regulated under article 10.1 of title 40, or is an agent or employee of such common carrier, to deliver alcohol beverages for any person who has not been issued a license or permit pursuant to this article 3;
- To remove an alcohol beverage from a licensed premises where the liquor license for the licensed premises allows only on-premises consumption of alcohol beverages, except as permitted under subsection (1)(i)(VI) of this section or section 44-3-107 (2).
-
-
An underage person is immune from arrest and prosecution under subsection (1)(c) or (1)(d) of this section if he or she establishes the following:
- The underage person called 911 and reported that another underage person was in need of medical assistance due to alcohol consumption;
- The underage person who called 911 provided his or her name to the 911 operator;
- The underage person was the first person to make the 911 report; and
- The underage person who made the 911 call remained on the scene with the underage person in need of medical assistance until assistance arrived and cooperated with medical assistance or law enforcement personnel on the scene.
- The immunity described in subsection (2)(a) of this section also extends to the underage person who was in need of medical assistance due to alcohol consumption if the conditions of subsection (2)(a) of this section are satisfied.
-
An underage person is immune from arrest and prosecution under subsection (1)(c) or (1)(d) of this section if he or she establishes the following:
- It is unlawful for any person licensed as a manufacturer, limited winery, brew pub, or distillery pub pursuant to this article 3 to manufacture alcohol beverages in any location other than the permanent location specifically designated in the license for manufacturing, except as allowed pursuant to section 44-3-402 (3), 44-3-403 (2)(a), 44-3-417 (1)(b), or 44-3-422 (1)(b).
-
- It is unlawful for any person to import or sell any imported alcohol beverage in this state unless that person is the primary source of supply in the United States for the brand of such liquor to be imported into or sold within this state and unless that person holds a valid importer's license issued under the provisions of this article 3.
- If it is determined by the state licensing authority, in its discretion, as not constituting unfair competition or unfair practice, any importer may be authorized by the state licensing authority to import and sell under and subject to the provisions of the importer's license any brand of alcohol beverage for which he or she is not the primary source of supply in the United States if the licensee is the sole source of supply of that brand of alcohol beverage in the state of Colorado and authorization is determined by the state licensing authority as not constituting a violation of section 44-3-308.
- Any such manufacturer or importer shall file with the state licensing authority notice of intent to import one or more specified brands of the alcohol beverage, together with a statement that the manufacturer or importer is the primary source of supply in the United States for the brand, unless exempted pursuant to subsection (4)(b) of this section, in which case, the manufacturer or importer shall also file a statement that the manufacturer or importer is the sole source of supply of that brand of beverage in the state of Colorado. Upon the request of the state licensing authority, the manufacturer or importer shall file a copy of the manufacturer's federal brand label approval form as required by the federal bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives or any of its successor agencies. Thereafter, the licensee shall file with the state licensing authority a copy of each sales invoice with a monthly sales report as required by section 44-3-503 (4) and (6).
- As used in this subsection (4), the term "primary source of supply in the United States" means the manufacturer, the producer, the owner of such alcohol beverage at the time it becomes a marketable product, the bottler in the United States, or the exclusive agent within the United States, or any of the states, of any such manufacturer, producer, owner, or bottler outside the United States. To be the "primary source of supply in the United States", the said manufacturer or importer must be the first source, such as the manufacturer or the source closest to the manufacturer, in the channel of commerce from which the product can be secured by Colorado alcohol beverage wholesalers.
- It is unlawful for any person licensed as an importer of alcohol beverages pursuant to this article 3 to deliver any such alcohol beverages to any person not in possession of a valid wholesaler's license.
-
It is unlawful for any person licensed to sell at wholesale pursuant to this article 3:
- To peddle malt, vinous, or spirituous liquor at wholesale or by means of a truck or other vehicle if the sale is consummated and delivery made concurrently, but nothing in this subsection (5)(a) shall prevent delivery from a truck or other vehicle of orders previously taken;
- To deliver malt liquors to any retail licensee located outside the geographic territory designated on the license application filed with the state licensing authority if the person holds a wholesaler's beer license;
- To purchase or receive any alcohol beverage from any person not licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44, unless otherwise provided in this article 3;
- To sell or serve any alcohol beverage to consumers for consumption on or off the licensed premises during any hours retailers are prohibited from selling or serving such liquors pursuant to subsection (6) of this section.
-
It is unlawful for any person licensed to sell at retail pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44:
-
- To sell an alcohol beverage to any person under the age of twenty-one years, to a habitual drunkard, or to a visibly intoxicated person. If a person who, in fact, is not twenty-one years of age exhibits a fraudulent proof of age, any action relying on such fraudulent proof of age shall not constitute grounds for the revocation or suspension of any license issued under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
- If a licensee or a licensee's employee has reasonable cause to believe that a person is under twenty-one years of age and is exhibiting fraudulent proof of age in an attempt to obtain any alcohol beverage, the licensee or employee shall be authorized to confiscate the fraudulent proof of age, if possible, and shall, within seventy-two hours after the confiscation, turn it over to a state or local law enforcement agency. The failure to confiscate such fraudulent proof of age or to turn it over to a state or local law enforcement agency within seventy-two hours after the confiscation shall not constitute a criminal offense, notwithstanding section 44-3-904 (1)(a).
- If a licensee or a licensee's employee believes that a person is under twenty-one years of age and is exhibiting fraudulent proof of age in an attempt to obtain any alcohol beverage, the licensee or the licensee's employee or any peace or police officer, acting in good faith and upon probable cause based upon reasonable grounds therefor, may detain and question the person in a reasonable manner for the purpose of ascertaining whether the person is guilty of any unlawful act under this section. Questioning of a person by a licensee or a licensee's employee or a peace or police officer does not render the licensee, the licensee's employee, or a peace or police officer civilly or criminally liable for slander, false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, or unlawful detention.
- Each licensee shall display a printed card that contains notice of the provisions of this subsection (6)(a).
- Any licensee or licensee's employee acting in good faith in accordance with the provisions of subsection (6)(a)(II) of this section shall be immune from any liability, civil or criminal; except that a licensee or employee acting willfully or wantonly shall not be immune from liability pursuant to subsection (6)(a)(II) of this section.
-
To sell, serve, or distribute any malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors at any time other than the following:
- For consumption on the premises on any day of the week, except between the hours of 2 a.m. and 7 a.m.;
- In sealed containers, beginning at 8 a.m. until 12 midnight each day; except that no malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors shall be sold, served, or distributed in a sealed container on Christmas day;
-
To sell fermented malt beverages:
- To any person under the age of twenty-one years, except as provided in section 18-13-122;
- To any person between the hours of 12 midnight and 8 a.m.; or
- In a sealed container on Christmas day;
- To offer for sale or solicit any order for vinous or spirituous liquors in person at retail except within the licensed premises;
- Except as provided in section 44-3-107 (2), to have in possession or upon the licensed premises any alcohol beverage, the sale of which is not permitted by said license;
- To buy any alcohol beverages from any person not licensed to sell at wholesale as provided by this article 3 except as otherwise provided in this article 3;
- To sell at retail alcohol beverages except in the permanent location specifically designated in the license for such sale;
- To fail to display at all times in a prominent place a printed card with a minimum height of fourteen inches and a width of eleven inches with each letter to be a minimum of one-half inch in height, which shall read as follows:
-
- To sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors or fermented malt beverages in a place where the alcohol beverages are to be consumed, unless the place is a hotel, restaurant, tavern, lodging and entertainment facility, racetrack, club, retail gaming tavern, or arts licensed premises or unless the place is a dining, club, or parlor car; plane; bus; or other conveyance or facility of a public transportation system.
- Notwithstanding subsection (6)(i)(I) of this section, it shall not be unlawful for a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee to allow tastings to be conducted on his or her licensed premises if authorization for the tastings has been granted pursuant to section 44-3-301.
- To display or cause to be displayed, on the licensed premises, any exterior sign advertising any particular brand of malt liquors or fermented malt beverages, unless the particular brand so designated in the sign is dispensed on draft or in sealed containers within the licensed premises wherein the sign is displayed;
-
- Except as provided in subsections (6)(k)(II), (6)(k)(IV), and (6)(k)(V) of this section, to have on the licensed premises, if licensed as a retail liquor store, liquor-licensed drugstore, or fermented malt beverage retailer, any container that shows evidence of having once been opened or that contains a volume of liquor less than that specified on the label of the container;
-
- A person holding a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore license under this article 3 may have upon the licensed premises malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors in open containers when the open containers were brought on the licensed premises by and remain solely in the possession of the sales personnel of a person licensed to sell at wholesale pursuant to this article 3 for the purpose of sampling malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors by the retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee only.
- A person holding a fermented malt beverage retailer's license under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) may have upon the licensed premises fermented malt beverages in open containers when the open containers were brought onto the licensed premises by and remain solely in the possession of the sales personnel of a person licensed to sell at wholesale pursuant to article 4 of this title 44 for the purpose of sampling fermented malt beverages by the fermented malt beverage retailer licensee only.
- Nothing in this subsection (6)(k) applies to any liquor-licensed drugstore where the contents, or a portion of the contents, have been used in compounding prescriptions.
- It is not unlawful for a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee to allow tastings to be conducted on the licensed premises if authorization for the tastings has been granted pursuant to section 44-3-301.
- A person holding a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore license under this article 3 or a fermented malt beverage retailer's license under section 44-4-107 (1)(a) may have upon the licensed premises an open container of an alcohol beverage product that the licensee discovers to be damaged or defective so long as the licensee marks the product as damaged or for return and stores the open container outside the sales area of the licensed premises until the licensee is able to return the product to the wholesaler from whom the product was purchased.
- To employ or permit, if the person is licensed to sell alcohol beverages for on-premises consumption or is the agent or manager of said licensee, any employee, waiter, waitress, entertainer, host, hostess, or agent of said licensee to solicit from patrons in any manner, for himself or herself or for any other employee, the purchase of any food, beverage, or any other thing of value;
- To require a wholesaler to make delivery to any premises other than the specific hotel and restaurant premises where the alcohol beverage is to be sold and consumed if the person is a hotel and restaurant licensee or the manager of a hotel and restaurant license requires the delivery;
-
- To authorize or permit any gambling, or the use of any gambling machine or device, except as provided by the "Bingo and Raffles Law", part 6 of article 21 of title 24. This subsection (6)(n) does not apply to those activities, equipment, and devices authorized and legally operated pursuant to articles 30 and 32 of this title 44.
- A person who violates any provision of this subsection (6)(n) is guilty of a class 5 felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-401.
- To authorize or permit toughperson fighting as defined in section 12-110-104;
-
-
- To permit a person under eighteen years of age to sell, dispense, or participate in the sale or dispensing of any alcohol beverage; or (p) (I) (A) To permit a person under eighteen years of age to sell, dispense, or participate in the sale or dispensing of any alcohol beverage; or
- Except as provided in subsection (6)(p)(II) of this section, to employ a person who is at least eighteen years of age but under twenty-one years of age to sell or dispense malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors unless the employee is supervised by another person who is on the licensed premises and is at least twenty-one years of age; except that this subsection (6)(p)(I)(B) does not apply to a retail liquor store licensed under section 44-3-409 or a liquor-licensed drugstore licensed under section 44-3-410;
- If licensed as a tavern under section 44-3-414 that does not regularly serve meals or a lodging and entertainment facility under section 44-3-428 that does not regularly serve meals, to permit an employee who is under twenty-one years of age to sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors; or
- If licensed as a retail liquor store under section 44-3-409, a liquor-licensed drugstore under section 44-3-410, or a fermented malt beverage retailer under section 44-4-107 (1)(a), to permit an employee who is under twenty-one years of age to deliver malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors or fermented malt beverages offered for sale on, or sold and removed from, the licensed premises of the retail liquor store, liquor-licensed drugstore, or fermented malt beverage retailer.
-
-
- It is unlawful for any importer, manufacturer, or brewer to sell or to bring into this state for purposes of sale any malt liquor without causing the same to be unloaded and placed in the physical possession of a licensed wholesaler at the wholesaler's licensed premises in this state and to be inventoried for purposes of tax collection prior to delivery to a retailer or consumer.
-
- It is unlawful for any person licensed pursuant to this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 to give away fermented malt beverages for the purpose of influencing the sale of any particular kind, make, or brand of any malt beverage and to furnish or supply any commodity or article at less than its market price for said purpose, except advertising material and signs.
- Notwithstanding subsection (8)(a) of this section, it shall not be unlawful for a retail liquor store or liquor-licensed drugstore licensee to allow tastings to be conducted on his or her licensed premises if authorization for the tastings has been granted pursuant to section 44-3-301.
- Repealed.
-
-
- Except as provided in subsection (10)(c) of this section, it is unlawful for a person who is licensed to sell alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises to knowingly permit the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises. (10) (a) (I) Except as provided in subsection (10)(c) of this section, it is unlawful for a person who is licensed to sell alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises to knowingly permit the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (10)(a)(II)(C) of this section, the licensee shall not be charged with permitting the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises when the licensee has posted a sign at least ten inches wide and six inches high by each exit used by the public that contains the following notice in type that is at least one-half inch in height:
- A person licensed pursuant to section 44-3-416 must post a sign with the specified notice and in the minimum type size required by subsection (10)(a)(II)(A) of this section that is at least twelve inches wide and eighteen inches high.
- Regardless of whether a licensee posts a sign as specified in subsection (10)(a)(II) of this section, the licensee may be charged with knowingly permitting the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises if the licensee shows reckless disregard for the prohibition against alcohol beverage removal from the licensed premises, which may include permitting the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises three times within a twelve-month period, regardless of whether the three incidents occur on the same day or separate days. A licensee may be charged with knowingly permitting the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises upon the third occurrence of alcohol beverage removal from the licensed premises.
- In addition to posting a sign as described in subsection (10)(a)(II) of this section, a licensee may also station personnel at each exit used by the public in order to prevent the removal of an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises.
- This subsection (10) applies to persons licensed or permitted to sell or serve alcohol beverages for consumption on the licensed premises pursuant to section 44-3-403, 44-3-411, 44-3-412, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-415, 44-3-416, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-419, 44-3-420, 44-3-421, 44-3-422, 44-3-424, 44-3-426, 44-3-428, or 44-4-107 (1)(b).
- This subsection (10) does not preclude a licensee described in section 44-3-423 (2) from permitting a customer to remove from the licensed premises one opened container of partially consumed vinous liquor that was purchased on the licensed premises and has been resealed, as permitted by section 44-3-423 (1).
-
-
- Except as provided in subsection (11)(b) of this section, a retail licensee or an employee of a retail licensee shall not sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors or fermented malt beverages to a consumer for consumption off the licensed premises unless the retail licensee or employee verifies that the consumer is at least twenty-one years of age by requiring the consumer to present a valid identification, as determined by the state licensing authority by rule. The retail licensee or employee shall make a determination from the information presented whether the purchaser is at least twenty-one years of age.
- It is not unlawful for a retail licensee or employee of a retail licensee to sell malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors or fermented malt beverages to a consumer who is or reasonably appears to be over fifty years of age and who failed to present an acceptable form of identification.
- As used in this subsection (11), "retail licensee" means a person licensed under section 44-3-409, 44-3-410, 44-4-104 (1)(c), or 44-4-107 (1)(a).
WARNING
IT IS ILLEGAL TO SELL WHISKEY, WINE, OR BEER TO ANY PERSON UNDER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF AGE, AND IT IS ILLEGAL FOR ANY PERSON UNDER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF AGE TO POSSESS OR TO ATTEMPT TO PURCHASE THE SAME. IDENTIFICATION CARDS WHICH APPEAR TO BE FRAUDULENT WHEN PRESENTED BY PURCHASERS MAY BE CONFISCATED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT AND TURNED OVER TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. IT IS ILLEGAL IF YOU ARE TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER FOR YOU TO PURCHASE WHISKEY, WINE, OR BEER FOR A PERSON UNDER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF AGE. FINES AND IMPRISONMENT MAY BE IMPOSED BY THE COURTS FOR VIOLATION OF THESE PROVISIONS.
WARNING
DO NOT LEAVE THE PREMISES OF THIS ESTABLISHMENT WITH AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE. IT IS ILLEGAL TO CONSUME AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE IN A PUBLIC PLACE. A FINE OF UP TO $250 MAY BE IMPOSED BY THE COURTS FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS PROVISION.
Source: L. 2018: IP(1), (1)(g), (1)(n), and (6)(e) amended, (SB 18-067), ch. 4, p. 31, § 3, effective March 1; (1)(m) amended, (HB 18-1375), ch. 274, p. 1696, § 8, effective May 29; (4)(c) amended, (SB 18-124), ch. 23, p. 277, § 1, effective August 8; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1049, § 2, effective October 1; (6)(n)(I) amended, (HB 18-1024), ch. 26, p. 321, § 7, effective October 1; IP(1), (1)(g), (1)(i)(I), (1)(i)(II), (6)(c), (6)(k), (6)(p)(I)(B), (6)(p)(II), (6)(p)(III), (10)(b), and (11) amended and (1)(i)(VII) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2205, § 11, effective January 1, 2019. L. 2019: IP(1)(i)(I), (1)(i)(I)(A), (1)(i)(VII), (3), IP(5), (5)(b), and (7) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 15, § 25, effective January 31; (1)(i)(VIII) added, (SB 19-200), ch. 307, p. 2798, § 1, effective August 2; (6)(o) amended, (HB 19-1172), ch. 136, p. 1734, § 262, effective October 1. L. 2020: (3) amended, (HB 20-1055), ch. 15, p. 68, § 3, effective September 14. L. 2022: (6)(m) amended, (HB 22-1415), ch. 426, p. 3019, § 5, effective June 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-47-901 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsections IP(1), (1)(g), (1)(n), and (6)(e) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-901 IP(1), (1)(f), (1)(m), and (5)(e), respectively, in SB 18-067. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (1)(m) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-901 (1)(l) in HB 18-1375. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (4)(c) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-901 (3)(c) in SB 18-124. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsection (6)(n)(I) of this section was numbered as § 12-47-901 (5)(n)(I) in HB 18-1024. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsections IP(1), (1)(g), (1)(i)(I), (1)(i)(II), (1)(i)(VII), (6)(c), (6)(k), (6)(p)(I)(B), (6)(p)(II), (6)(p)(III), (10)(b), and (11) of this section were numbered as § 12-47-901 IP(1), (1)(f), (1)(h)(I), (1)(h)(II), (1)(h)(VII), (5)(c), (5)(k), (5)(p)(I)(B), (5)(p)(II), (5)(p)(III), (9)(b), and (10), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective January 1, 2019.
- Subsection (9)(b) provided for the repeal of subsection (9), effective January 1, 2019. (See L. 2016, pp. 1536, 1539.)
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Subsection (1)(a) requires a showing of constructive knowledge. It is not a strict liability offense. Constructive knowledge means "knowledge that one using reasonable care or diligence should have and, therefore, that is attributed by law to a given person". The holder of a liquor license and the licensee's agents have an affirmative responsibility to reasonably conduct the business with a view to compliance with the law. Full Moon Saloon, Inc. v. City of Loveland, 111 P.3d 568 (Colo. App. 2005) (decided under former law); Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
The word "permit" requires a showing of actual or constructive knowledge. Full Moon Saloon, Inc. v. City of Loveland, 111 P.3d 568 (Colo. App. 2005); Morris-Schindler, LLC v. City & County of Denver, 251 P.3d 1076 (Colo. App. 2010).
"Habitual drunkard" has a common meaning. Whether a person is a habitual drunkard is an issue of fact based upon the circumstances of each case. The knowledge of the vendor may be shown by direct or circumstantial evidence and does not require a formal notice or prior court adjudication. K & S Corp. v. Greeley Liquor Licensing Auth., 183 P.3d 710 (Colo. App. 2008).
Affirmative defense set forth in subsection (5) only available when minor presents a currently valid form of identification. A license shall not be revoked or suspended for the sale of alcohol to a person under the age of 21 if the person presents a fraudulent proof of age. Nevertheless, the department may revoke or suspend a license if the fraudulent proof of age is not currently valid. "Currently valid identification" includes being facially valid, not expired, and valid as to form. Minh Le v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 198 P.3d 1247 (Colo. App. 2008).
Paper tickets that contain a coupon on one side and a cash prize game on the other and the machine that dispenses them are gambling devices that are illegal under this section. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in declaring that the machine, tickets, and money were subject to confiscation and forfeiture. Sniezek v. Dept. of Rev., 113 P.3d 1280 (Colo. App. 2005).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-46-112.
Law reviews. For article, "One Year Review of Agency, Partnerships, C orporations, and Municipal C orporations", see 41 Den. L. Ctr. J. 61 (1964). For article, "1986 Colorado Tort Reform Legislation", see 15 Colo. Law. 1363 (1986).
No legislative intent to assume exclusive control of hours. A resolution adopted by the board of county commissioners prohibiting the sale of malt or vinous liquors and fermented malt beverages between the hours of 12:00 midnight on Saturday and 8:00 A.M. on Monday is valid as there is not evident a legislative intent in this section to assume exclusive control of the hours of establishment dispensing alcoholic beverages. Gettman v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 122 Colo. 185, 221 P.2d 363 (1950).
This section merely prohibits the sale of 3.2 fermented malt beverages between the specified hours and does not by implication create any right under the statute to sell such at all other times. Kelly v. City of Fort Collins, 163 Colo. 520, 431 P.2d 785 (1967).
For actions arising prior to legislation enacted in 1985 and 1986, if it is ascertained that a tavern owner violated this section and that the violation proximately caused injury, this section may be the basis for a claim of negligence per se. Lyons v. Nasby, 770 P.2d 1250 (Colo. 1989).
Tavern owner has both a statutory and common-law duty to exercise due care not to serve alcoholic beverages to a visibly intoxicated patron and a tavern owner who breaches that duty will be liable in tort to third persons who are harmed as a result of the owner's breach of duty. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
It was incumbent upon plaintiff to establish a legal duty on the part of the tavern to protect him from the bodily harm caused to him by the act of a tavern patron. The foreseeability element of legal duty required the plaintiff to establish that the employees of the tavern had some notice, either actual or constructive, that the tavern patron posed an unreasonable risk of harm to the plaintiff or other persons legitimately on the tavern premises. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
A city cannot enlarge on the state-provided hours of sale. Kelly v. City of Fort Collins, 163 Colo. 520, 431 P.2d 785 (1967).
However, where local conditions have been found to require reasonably fewer hours of dispensing fermented malt beverage, such action does not infringe upon the state's legislative prerogative or objectives. Kelly v. City of Fort Collins, 163 Colo. 520, 431 P.2d 785 (1967).
It is not necessary for the holder of a 3.2 beer license to surrender the same before making application for a broader license to dispense alcoholic beverages. Bacher v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 67, 314 P.2d 607 (1957).
Where at the time a party applies for a three-way license he holds a 3.2 beer license, he cannot hold two licenses for the same establishment at the same time, but it would only be necessary for him to surrender the limited license in order to hold the broader three-way privilege, should it be granted. Bacher v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 136 Colo. 67, 314 P.2d 607 (1957).
Insufficient evidence to sustain suspension of license. Dennis, Inc. v. Office of Dir. of Excise & Licenses, 620 P.2d 53 (Colo. App. 1980).
Applied in People v. Sherman, 197 Colo. 442, 593 P.2d 971 (1979).
Cases Decided Under Former § 12-47-128.
Analysis
I. GENERAL CONSIDERATION.
Legal sale activities. Sales activities which are not restricted, limited, or otherwise regulated by art. 47 of title 12 are not illegal. People v. Kagan, 195 Colo. 76, 575 P.2d 416 (1978).
Paragraph (d) of subsection (1) (now paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection (5)) of this section is constitutional. McClain v. People, 111 Colo. 271, 141 P.2d 685 (1943).
Subsection (5)(l), which prohibited any liquor licensee's employee from soliciting patrons to purchase "any alcoholic beverage or any other thing of value" for the soliciting employee or other employee, was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad and was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. People v. Becker, 759 P.2d 26 (Colo. 1988) (decided under law in effect prior to 1986 amendment).
Licensee's affirmative responsibility to see business not conducted in violation of law. The holder of a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages has an affirmative responsibility to see that his business is not conducted by his employees or by his employees in concert with other persons in violation of the law. Clown's Den, Inc. v. Canjar, 33 Colo. App. 212, 518 P.2d 957 (1974).
The prohibition against selling without a license being first secured is one of the conditions imposed by this article. Van DeVegt v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 98 Colo. 161, 55 P.2d 703 (1936).
A contract to buy or sell liquor in violation of this condition is illegal and unenforceable, and, upon breach of the contract by the seller, the buyer may not recover a part payment made on the purchase price. Potter v. Swinehart, 117 Colo. 23, 184 P.2d 149 (1947).
Where the statute makes the character of beverages sold the substance of the offense, such character must be proved by the state. Woods v. People, 156 Colo. 212, 397 P.2d 871 (1964).
Consumption at social club not violative. Where members of a social club would purchase liquor at a licensed establishment, and then would bring the liquor to the club premises to be consumed by all members, the consumption was permissible even though the club had no liquor license, because there is no prohibition against consuming liquor where no sale is involved. City & County of Denver v. Protocrats, Inc., 136 Colo. 384, 318 P.2d 600 (1957).
Section as basis for defense to antitrust action. See Adolph Coors Co. v. A & S Whsles., Inc., 561 F.2d 807 (10th Cir. 1977).
Applied in People v. Kagan, 195 Colo. 76, 575 P.2d 416 (1978); In re Title Pertaining to Sale of Table Wine in Grocery Stores, 646 P.2d 916 (Colo. 1982); Citizens for Free Enter. v. Dept. of Rev., 649 P.2d 1054 (Colo. 1982).
II. UNLAWFUL TO SELL TO DRUNKARD OR PERSON UNDER TWENTY-ONE.
Law reviews. For comment, " C respin v. Largo C orporation and the Legislative Response: The Turbulent State of Dram Shop Liability in Colorado", see 57 U. Colo. L. Rev. 419 (1986). For article, "1986 Colorado Tort Reform Legislation", see 15 Colo. Law. 1363 (1986).
The prohibition under this section is primarily directed against the employer or owner. Hershorn v. People, 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680 (1941).
The employer or owner cannot escape guilt by attempting to shift the crime to his employee, and he is liable for an unlawful sale made by his agent or servant within the scope of his authority. Hershorn v. People, 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680 (1941).
A licensed liquor dealer must see that his customer is not within a proscribed class, proceeding otherwise, he does so at his peril. People v. Wilson, 106 Colo. 437, 106 P.2d 352 (1940).
To make unlawful the sale of intoxicants to minors and inebriates, regardless of intent, is a reasonable legislative regulation of the liquor traffic, so long as the proscribed act amounts only to a misdemeanor. Hershorn v. People, 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680 (1941).
This section is a penal law and bears no relationship to liability under statutes commonly known as "civil damage acts" or "dramshop acts". Hull v. Rund, 150 Colo. 425, 374 P.2d 351 (1962).
Where plaintiffs claimed damages from tavern owner for assault from intoxicated person, their remedy is under the common law and not under the statutes. Hull v. Rund, 150 Colo. 425, 374 P.2d 351 (1962).
Violation of this section may constitute negligence per se and, thus, may be a breach of the duty of due care. Whether it was foreseeable that the breach by defendant would cause damage to plaintiff's legally protected interest is one of fact and must be submitted to a fact-finder. Bartley v. Floyd, 695 P.2d 781 (Colo. App. 1984), aff'd, 727 P.2d 1109 (Colo. 1986); Largo Corp. v. Crespin, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986).
While this section is not a civil damage act or dram shop act, a violation of this section may be used as evidence of negligence under the common law. Crespin v. Largo Corp., 698 P.2d 826 (Colo. App. 1984), aff'd, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986); Thomas v. Pete's Satire, Inc., 717 P.2d 509 (Colo. App. 1985) (decided prior to 1986 enactment of § 12-47-128.5).
Criminal statute may be relied upon to establish negligence per se, even though statute is silent on issue of civil liability. Largo Corp. v. Crespin, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986) (decided prior to 1986 enactment of § 12-47-128.5).
Intentionally tortious or criminal act of third party does not break causal chain of defendant's negligence, where third party's act is reasonably foreseeable by defendant. Largo Corp. v. Crespin, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986) (decided prior to 1986 enactment of § 12-47-128.5).
This section's prohibition of the sale of liquor to intoxicated persons was designed to protect widow from type of injury she suffered when husband was struck by intoxicated motorist, so that bar owner's violation of statute could be relied upon by widow to conclusively establish bar owner's negligence in wrongful death action arising out of collusion. Largo Corp. v. Crespin, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986) (decided prior to 1986 enactment of § 12-47-128.5).
Finding that commercial seller of alcohol had not exercised reasonable care to avoid selling alcoholic beverages to intoxicated patron was sufficiently supported by evidence that seller's employees continued to serve ten to thirteen beers to patron over four to five-hour period, even though patron stumbled over chairs and tables and periodically blacked out. Largo Corp. v. Crespin, 727 P.2d 1098 (Colo. 1986) (decided prior to 1986 enactment of § 12-47-128.5).
Tavern owner has both a statutory and common-law duty to exercise due care not to serve alcoholic beverages to a visibly intoxicated patron, and a tavern owner who breaches that duty will be liable in tort to third persons who are harmed as a result of the owner's breach of duty. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
It was incumbent upon plaintiff to establish a legal duty on the part of the tavern to protect him from the bodily harm caused to him by the act of a tavern patron. The foreseeability element of legal duty required the plaintiff to establish that the employees of the tavern had some notice, either actual or constructive, that the tavern patron posed an unreasonable risk of harm to the plaintiff or other persons legitimately on the tavern premises. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
Foreseeability of harm is a prominent, but not exclusive, element in determining a tavern proprietor's legal duty to patrons and other persons legitimately on the tavern premises. A court must also consider, in addition to the foreseeability of harm, the social utility of the proprietor's conduct, the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, the consequences of placing that burden upon the defendant, and any other relevant factors implicated by the facts of the case. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
While the foreseeability element of legal duty does not require a tavern proprietor to foresee the specific type of harm which a tavern patron will perpetrate against another or the manner in which that harm will likely be caused, it does require that the proprietor have actual or constructive notice that the patron poses an unreasonable risk of physical harm to other persons legitimately on the premises. Only then, when the tavern proprietor has such notice, is the proprietor under a duty to exercise reasonable measures to protect others legitimately on the premises from harm. Observatory Corp. v. Daly, 780 P.2d 462 (Colo. 1989).
For actions arising prior to legislation enacted in 1985 and 1986, if it is ascertained that a tavern owner violated this section and that the violation proximately caused injury, this section may be the basis for a claim of negligence per se. Lyons v. Nasby, 770 P.2d 1250 (Colo. 1989).
This section is not a bar to the defense of contributory negligence. Thomas v. Pete's Satire, Inc., 717 P.2d 509 (Colo. App. 1985).
License suspended for sale of wine to minor. DiManna v. Kalbin, 646 P.2d 403 (Colo. App. 1982).
Ignorance or mistake as to minor's age is no defense in a criminal prosecution for the sale of liquor to a minor. Hershorn v. People, 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680 (1941).
Minor who transfers intoxicants to other minor qualifies as "person", for purpose of statute making it unlawful for any "person" to deliver intoxicants to minor, though transfer is made without consideration and in furtherance of joint undertaking to obtain alcoholic beverages. Floyd v. Bartley, 727 P.2d 1109 (Colo. 1986).
Where accused manager of a night club was charged with selling liquor to an intoxicated minor, an instruction that a corporation can only act through its agents, officers, or employees, and that if the accused was president and general manager, having control of its employees and policies, he would be responsible for the violation of this section by a waiter acting as agent or employee of the corporation within the general scope of his employment, correctly stated the law. Hershorn v. People, 108 Colo. 43, 113 P.2d 680 (1941).
General assembly's reenactment of criminal code provisions do not supersede provisions of the liquor code, and person violating liquor code must be prosecuted for those violations and not provisions of the criminal code. People v. O'Donnell, 926 P.2d 114 (Colo. App. 1996).
III. SALE ONLY AT PERMANENT LOCATION.
Law reviews. For comment on Page v. Blunt, appearing below, see 25 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 259 (1953).
Personal license right restricted to certain place. A liquor license vests a personal right in the licensee and confers the right to do that which without the license would be unlawful, such right being coextensive with the duration of the license and is restricted to a certain location, unless change thereof is granted upon application to, and after a hearing by, the licensing authority. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
There is no vested right in a licensee to move the location of his license, and, upon application so to do, the court may, and should, consider the same as in case of application for a new license because the statute requires it be given like consideration. MacArthur v. Martelli, 127 Colo. 308, 255 P.2d 969 (1953).
The requirements for change of license location are the same as those for obtaining a license, and the duties and authority of the licensing official are the same. MacArthur v. Martelli, 127 Colo. 308, 255 P.2d 969 (1953).
A city council is required to consider two things under this section: (1) The requirement of the neighborhood; and (2) the desires of the inhabitants. Page v. Blunt, 126 Colo. 324, 248 P.2d 1074 (1952).
Before there can be any issuance of a liquor license, or a transfer thereof at the local level, the state authority must approve the action of the local authority. Moschetti v. Liquor Licensing Auth., 176 Colo. 281, 490 P.2d 299 (1971).
Since the concurrent action of the two authorities is mandatory, if the local authority denies a license, appeal therefrom to the district court under § 24-4-106 would lie because the state alone cannot authorize the issuance, but, where there is approval at the local level, it is of no force and effect without also the state approval, for absent the latter administrative procedure, the entire administrative process is not complete. Moschetti v. Liquor Licensing Auth., 176 Colo. 281, 490 P.2d 299 (1971).
This section permits removal to another location of a hotel and restaurant license upon a proper showing. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Contract to the contrary is not violative. While the section permits removal to another location of a hotel or restaurant license upon a proper showing, a contract by which the parties agree that the licensee will not exercise this privilege, but upon termination of the tenancy will surrender the license to the licensing authority, is not in violation of the law since it is not an agreement for the transfer of the license. A. D. Jones & Co. v. Parsons, 136 Colo. 434, 319 P.2d 480 (1957).
Refusal of application for permission to transfer location of liquor license from 3015 East Colfax Avenue to 3018 East Colfax Avenue, Denver, held not arbitrary. MacArthur v. Martelli, 127 Colo. 308, 255 P.2d 969 (1953).
IV. GAMBLING.
Application of "gambling" definitions in §§ 18-10-102, 18-10-103, 18-10-105, and 18-10-107 by hearing officer to determine a violation of subsection (5)(n) of this section was not in excess of his authority. Brownlee v. Dept. of Rev., 686 P.2d 1372 (Colo. App. 1984).
Nonprofit corporation's fund-raising on hotel premises which involved casino-type gambling with play money violated this section because participants were risking a thing of value for gain contingent in whole or in part upon chance and the gambling, although incidental to a social relationship, was participated in by persons other than natural persons and was conducted under circumstances in which persons participated in professional gambling as intended by the statute. Charnes v. Central City Opera House, 773 P.2d 546 (Colo. 1989).
To determine whether a game is incidental to a bona fide social relationship and thus excluded from the definition of gambling, the critical inquiry is whether the participants came together for any shared purpose other than gambling; where a basketball pool was entered into only by devoted patrons of a neighborhood bar and liquor authority inspectors, it was incidental to a bona fide social relationship. Leichliter v. State Liquor Licensing Auth., 9 P.3d 1153 (Colo. 1999).
44-3-902. Testing for intoxication by law enforcement officers - when prohibited.
- No person who is patronizing a licensed premises as defined in sections 44-3-103 (24) and 44-4-103 (3) shall be required or solicited by any law enforcement officer to submit to any mechanical test for the purpose of determining the alcohol content of the person's blood or breath while he or she is upon the licensed premises except to determine if there is a violation of section 42-4-1301 by a driver of a motor vehicle, unless the law enforcement officer is acting pursuant to a court order obtained in the manner described in subsection (2) of this section. No such test may be performed upon any licensed premises to obtain evidence of alleged intoxication, except pursuant to a court order as provided in this section or in case of a medical emergency, regardless of whether the alleged intoxication is a violation of any provision of this article 3.
- An ex parte order to permit any law enforcement officer to solicit any person who is patronizing a licensed premises, as defined in sections 44-3-103 (24) and 44-4-103 (3), to submit to any mechanical test for the purpose of determining the alcohol content of the person's blood or breath while he or she is upon such licensed premises may be issued by any judge of competent jurisdiction in the state of Colorado, including a district, county, or municipal court judge, upon application of a district attorney or a law enforcement agency showing probable cause to believe that evidence will be obtained of the commission of the crime of providing any alcohol beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or minor in violation of section 44-3-901 (1)(a) or (6)(a)(I).
-
Each application for an ex parte order as described in subsection (2) of this section shall be made in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge of competent jurisdiction, including a district, county, or municipal court judge, and shall state the applicant's authority to make the application. Each application shall include the following information:
- The identity of the investigative or law enforcement officer making the application, and the officer authorizing the application;
-
A complete statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his or her belief that an order should be issued, which shall include, but not be limited to:
- A sufficient description of the licensed premises that is proposed to be the subject of the court order;
- Evidence that shows probable cause to believe that there have been frequent and continuing violations of section 44-3-901 (1)(a) or (6)(a)(I) regarding the crime of providing any alcohol beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or minor; and
- A complete statement as to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or why other investigative procedures reasonably appear to be impractical for economic or other reasons or unlikely to succeed if tried.
-
Upon an application being made in accordance with subsection (3) of this section, the judge may enter an ex parte order, as requested or as modified, authorizing or approving testing as described in subsection (2) of this section in a particular licensed premises located within the territorial jurisdiction of the court in which the judge is sitting, and within the jurisdiction of the district attorney or law enforcement agency making the request, if the judge determines on the basis of the facts submitted by the applicant that:
- There is probable cause to believe that there have been frequent and continuing violations of section 44-3-901 (1)(a) or (6)(a)(I) regarding the crime of providing an alcohol beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or minor; and
- Normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or reasonably appear impractical for economic or other reasons or unlikely to succeed if tried.
- Any order issued pursuant to subsection (4) of this section, the application for such order, and any information or evidence submitted to the court in support of such order, shall not be disclosed to any person other than the law enforcement officer or agency that applied for the order until the order has been executed at the licensed premises to which the order applies.
- Any evidence obtained through any violation of this section shall not be admissible in any court of this state or in any administrative proceeding in this state.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1059, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-902 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-903. Alcohol-without-liquid devices - legislative declaration - definition - unlawful acts.
-
-
The general assembly hereby finds and declares that:
- Alcohol-without-liquid (AWOL) devices create alcohol vapor by pouring alcohol into a diffuser capsule connected to an oxygen pipe;
- AWOL devices enable individuals to inhale or snort the alcohol vapor created from certain alcohol beverages through a tube into the nose or mouth rather than drink the alcohol beverage in its liquid form through the mouth;
- Alcohol vapor ingested from an AWOL device bypasses the stomach and the filtering capabilities of the liver and is absorbed through blood vessels in the nose or lungs creating a faster and more intense "high" or intoxicating effect on the brain;
- The popularity of AWOL devices is increasing in the nightclub and bar businesses throughout the nation; and
- AWOL devices are being marketed as a way to become intoxicated without a hangover and as a "dieter's dream" because there are no calories associated with inhaling or snorting alcohol vapor.
-
The general assembly, therefore, determines that:
- AWOL devices will substantially increase the economic costs of alcohol abuse in Colorado;
- AWOL devices are not conducive to the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Colorado; and
- The possession, sale, purchase, and use of AWOL devices in this state should be prohibited.
-
The general assembly hereby finds and declares that:
- For purposes of this section, "AWOL device" means a device, machine, apparatus, or appliance that mixes an alcohol beverage with pure or diluted oxygen to produce an alcohol vapor that an individual can inhale or snort. "AWOL device" does not include an inhaler, nebulizer, atomizer, or other device that is designed and intended by the manufacturer to dispense a prescribed or over-the-counter medication.
- Except as otherwise provided in subsection (5) of this section, it is unlawful for a person to possess, purchase, sell, offer to sell, or use an AWOL device in this state. A person who violates this section shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of section 44-3-904 (2).
- In addition to the penalty imposed by this section, if a person that violates subsection (3) of this section is a licensee, the state or local licensing authority may suspend or revoke the license of the licensee in accordance with the provisions of section 44-3-601.
-
- Subsection (3) of this section shall not apply to a hospital that operates primarily for the purpose of conducting scientific research, a state institution conducting bona fide research, a private college or university, as defined in section 23-2-102 (11), conducting bona fide research, or to a pharmaceutical company or biotechnology company conducting bona fide research and that complies with the provisions of this subsection (5).
- A hospital, state institution, private college or university, pharmaceutical company, or biotechnology company that possesses an AWOL device or that intends to acquire an AWOL device, shall, by September 1, 2005, or within thirty days prior to the acquisition, whichever is later, file with the Colorado department of public health and environment or its designee a notice of possession of AWOL device or a notice of acquisition of AWOL device, as appropriate.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1060, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-902.5 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-904. Violations - penalties.
-
- Except as provided in subsections (2), (3), and (4) of this section, any person violating any of the provisions of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 or any of the rules authorized and adopted pursuant to such articles commits a civil infraction.
- The penalties provided in this section shall not be affected by the penalties provided in any other section of this article 3 or article 4 or 5 of this title 44 but shall be construed to be in addition to any other penalties.
- Any person violating any of the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(a), (1)(g), (1)(h), (1)(j), (1)(l), (1)(m), (6)(a)(I), or (6)(b) or section 44-3-903 commits a class 2 misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501.
- A person violating the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(b) commits a class 2 misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501.
- Any person violating any of the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(c) or (1)(d) commits a class 2 misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501. For the second conviction and for all subsequent convictions of violating the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(c) or (1)(d), the court shall impose at least the minimum fine and shall have no discretion to suspend any fine so imposed; except that the court may provide for the payment of such fine as provided in subsection (5) of this section.
- At the discretion of the court, the fines provided for violations of section 44-3-901 (1)(c) and (1)(d) may be ordered to be paid by public work only at a reasonable hourly rate to be established by the court, who shall designate the time within which the public work is to be completed.
- Any person who knowingly violates the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(b), (1)(e), or (1)(l) or any person who knowingly induces, aids, or encourages a person under the age of eighteen years to violate the provisions of section 44-3-901 (1)(b), (1)(c), or (1)(d) may be proceeded against pursuant to section 18-6-701 for contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1061, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2021: (1)(a) and (3) amended, (SB 21-271), ch. 462, p. 3327, § 784, effective March 1, 2022.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-903 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, "One Year Review of Agency, Partnerships, Corporations, and Municipal Corporations", see 41 Den. L. Ctr. J. 61 (1964).
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
General assembly intended subsection (5) to apply to violations of § 12-47-901 (1)(a.5). The time between the 2005 and 2007 amendment when paragraph (a.5) was not listed in subsection (5) did not manifest an intent to exclude application. People v. Davis, 218 P.3d 718 (Colo. App. 2008).
Authority granted to director to define criminal conduct is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. Although the general assembly may not delegate to an administrative agency the power to define criminal conduct, it may authorize the agency to adopt rules carrying criminal sanctions as long as the statutory scheme provides sufficient standards and safeguards to protect against the unreasonable exercise of discretionary power and offers adequate notice of the penalties applicable to a violator. People v. Lowrie, 761 P.2d 778 (Colo. 1988).
Due to general assembly's specification. The general assembly has specifically directed that revocation of the license under this section cannot be effected in the absence of a conviction of an offense described as a misdemeanor by this section. Bunzel v. City of Golden, 151 Colo. 352, 378 P.2d 208 (1963).
Procedures for the revocation by a city of a license to sell 3.2 percent beer are controlled by this section. Bunzel v. City of Golden, 151 Colo. 352, 378 P.2d 208 (1963).
In the absence of a conviction of violation of this section a city is without power to revoke license to sell 3.2 beer. Bunzel v. City of Golden, 151 Colo. 352, 378 P.2d 208 (1963).
Applicability of liquor code. The provisions of this article do not apply to third persons who are not applicants of licensees and whose conduct does not violate specific provisions of this article but does violate specific provisions of the criminal code. People v. Eckley, 775 P.2d 566 (Colo. 1989).
Prosecutorial discretion for violations of the liquor code is limited to the specific punishment provisions of the code unless otherwise indicated. People v. Bagby, 734 P.2d 1059 (Colo. 1987).
Applied in C.V. Enters., Inc. v. State, Dept. of Rev., 42 Colo. App. 337, 593 P.2d 984 (1979); People v. Luciano, 662 P.2d 480 (Colo. 1983).
44-3-905. Duties of inspectors and police officers.
- The inspectors of the liquor enforcement division and their supervisors, while actually engaged in performing their duties and while acting under proper orders or regulations, shall have and exercise all the powers vested in peace officers of this state. In the exercise of their duties, the inspectors and their supervisors shall have the power to arrest. The inspectors and their supervisors shall also have the authority to issue summonses for violations of the provisions of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44.
- It is the duty of all sheriffs and police officers to enforce the provisions of this article 3 and articles 4 and 5 of this title 44 and the rules made pursuant to said articles and to arrest and complain against any person violating any of the provisions of this article 3 or rules pertaining thereto. It is the duty of the district attorney of the respective judicial districts of this state to prosecute all violations of said articles in the manner and form as is now provided by law for the prosecution of crimes and misdemeanors, and it is a violation of said articles for any such person, knowingly, to fail to perform any duties pursuant to this section.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1062, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-904 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
The authority of a liquor enforcement officer does not exceed that of his principal. Fouquet v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 144 Colo. 240, 355 P.2d 943 (1960).
Authority only within specified territory. The assignment to a liquor enforcement officer of a specified territory in which to perform his duties carries a clear implication that he was to perform his duties within such territory and not elsewhere, and no presumption arises that he had authority beyond the boundaries of his allotted territory. Fouquet v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 144 Colo. 240, 355 P.2d 943 (1960).
No authority to participate in private business. It is no part of the legal authority of the liquor license division or of a liquor enforcement officer to promote, facilitate, or assist in the purchase and sale of any business and premises, whatever its nature. Fouquet v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 144 Colo. 240, 355 P.2d 943 (1960).
Nor travel for such purpose. Even though the answering of questions and supplying of information are generally within a liquor enforcement officer's implied authority, such authority, however, cannot be extended to embrace a trip to a distant city to assist in the promotion of a private transaction in which neither he nor his employer had an official interest. Fouquet v. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 144 Colo. 240, 355 P.2d 943 (1960).
Applied in Adams County Golf, Inc. v. Colo. Dept. of Rev., 199 Colo. 423, 610 P.2d 97 (1980).
44-3-906. Warrants - searches and seizures.
- If any person makes an affidavit before the judge of any county or district court stating that he or she has reason to and does believe that alcohol beverages are being sold, bartered, exchanged, divided, or unlawfully given away, or kept for such purposes, or carried in violation of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44 within the jurisdiction of such court, and describing in the affidavit the premises, wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device to be searched, the judge of the court shall issue a warrant to any officer, which the complainant may designate, having power to serve original process commanding the officer to search the premises (other than a home), wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device described in the affidavit.
- The warrant shall be substantially as follows:
- The officer charged with the execution of the warrant, when necessary to obtain entrance or when entrance has been refused, may break open any premises (other than a home), wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device that by said warrant the officer is directed to search and may execute said warrant any hour of the day or night.
STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of.................................................) The People of the State of Colorado to.......................................................... Greeting: Whereas, there has been filed with the undersigned an affidavit of which the following is a copy:
(Here copy of affidavit)
Therefore you are hereby commanded, in the name of the people of the State of Colorado, forthwith, together with the necessary and proper assistance to enter into .................... ....................
(Here describe place mentioned in the affidavit)
of the said ........ situated in the county of ........ aforesaid and there diligently search for the said alcohol beverages and that you bring the same or any part thereof found in such search, together with such vessels in which such beverages are found and the implements and furniture used in connection therewith, and the wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device in which carried, forthwith before me, to be disposed of and dealt with according to law. Given under my hand and seal this ........ day of ........, ...... ............................................ Judge of the ................ Court
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1063, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-905 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.
There must be strict compliance with any law which provides for its own enforcement by means of search, seizure, and disposition of or forfeiture of property. People ex rel. Protective Fin. Corp. v. Kinnison, 94 Colo. 350, 30 P.2d 249 (1934).
Proceedings for issuance of a search warrant must be in strict conformity with the statute, and every constitutional and statutory requirement must be observed. People ex rel. Protective Fin. Corp. v. Kinnison, 94 Colo. 350, 30 P.2d 249 (1934).
In proceeding under a search warrant there must be a strict compliance with formalities required by statute. People ex rel. Protective Fin. Corp. v. Kinnison, 94 Colo. 350, 30 P.2d 249 (1934).
If the search is illegal the seizure will also be illegal. People ex rel. Protective Fin. Corp. v. Kinnison, 94 Colo. 350, 30 P.2d 249 (1934).
Every officer making an unconstitutional search or advising or conniving at such conduct, is in violation of the law. Massantonio v. People, 77 Colo. 392, 236 P. 1019 (1925).
Consent vitiates illegality. A defendant in a prosecution under the prohibition act, who has consented to a search of his premises, cannot thereafter complain that he was deprived of his constitutional protection against such a search, and intoxicating liquor found in the search and what defendant said regarding it, are admissible in evidence. Smuk v. People, 72 Colo. 97, 209 P. 636 (1922).
44-3-907. Return on warrant - sale of liquor seized.
- If any alcohol beverages are there found, said officer shall seize the same and the vessels in which they are contained and all implements and furniture used or kept in connection with such beverages in the illegal selling, bartering, exchanging, giving away, or carrying of same, and any wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device used in conveying the same, and safely keep them and make immediate return on the warrant. The property shall not be taken from the custody of any officer seizing or holding the same by writ of replevin or other process while the proceedings relating thereto are pending.
- Final judgment of conviction in such proceedings shall be a bar to any suit for the recovery of any property so seized or the value of same or for damages alleged to arise by reason of the seizure and detention. The judgment entered shall find said alcohol beverages to be unlawful and shall direct their destruction or sale forthwith, in the manner provided by subsection (7) of this section. The wagon, automobile, truck, vehicle, contrivance, thing, or device, vessels, implements, and furniture shall likewise be ordered disposed of in the same manner as personal property is sold under execution, and the proceeds therefrom applied, first in the payment of the cost of the prosecution and of any fine imposed, and the balance, if any, paid into the general school fund of the county in which the conviction is had.
- The officer serving the warrant shall forthwith proceed in the manner required for the institution of a criminal action in the court issuing the warrant, charging a violation of law as the evidence in the case justifies. If the officer refuses or neglects to so proceed as specified, then the person filing the affidavit for the search warrant, or any other person, may so proceed.
- If, during the trial of a person charged with a violation of this article 3, the evidence presented discloses that fluids were poured out, or otherwise destroyed, manifestly for the purpose of preventing seizure, said fluids shall be held to be prima facie alcohol beverages and intended for unlawful use, sale, barter, exchange, or gift.
- If no person is in possession of the premises where illegal alcohol beverages are found, the officer seizing the alcohol beverages shall post in a conspicuous place on said premises a copy of the warrant, and if at the time fixed for any hearing concerning the alcohol beverages seized, or within thirty days thereafter, no person appears, the court in which the hearing was to be held shall order the alcohol beverages destroyed or sold in the manner provided in subsection (7) of this section.
- No warrant issued pursuant to this article 3 shall authorize the search of any place where a person may lawfully keep alcohol beverages as provided in this article 3. No warrant shall be issued to search a home occupied as such, as provided in this section, unless it or some part of it is used in connection with or as a store, shop, hotel, boardinghouse, rooming house, or place of public resort.
-
Any sale of alcohol beverages conducted upon order of court pursuant to this section shall be conducted in the following manner:
- The officer ordered by the court to conduct the sale shall give notice of the time and place of the sale by posting a notice in a prominent place in the county for a period of five consecutive days prior to the day of the sale. The notice shall describe as fully as possible the property to be sold and shall state the time and place of the sale.
- The sale shall be conducted as a public auction in some suitable public place on the specified day at some time between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., and the time chosen for the sale shall be indicated in the notice.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1064, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-906 as it existed prior to 2018.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note. The following annotations include a case decided under former provisions similar to this section.
Forfeitures are generally not favored in law, and may be enforced only when accomplished within the letter and spirit of law. Walker v. City of Denver, 720 P.2d 619 (Colo. App. 1986).
A criminal conviction is a condition precedent to forfeiture under this section. Walker v. City of Denver, 720 P.2d 619 (Colo. App. 1986).
44-3-908. Loss of property rights.
There shall be no property rights of any kind in any alcohol beverages, vessels, appliances, fixtures, bars, furniture, implements, wagons, automobiles, trucks, vehicles, contrivances, or any other things or devices used in or kept for the purpose of violating any of the provisions of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1065, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-907 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-909. Colorado state fair - common consumption area - national western center - consumption on premises.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, a person who purchases an alcohol beverage for consumption from a vendor licensed under this article 3 that is either attached to a common consumption area or licensed for the fairgrounds of the Colorado state fair authority may leave the licensed premises with the alcohol beverage and possess and consume the alcohol beverage at any place within the common consumption area or fairgrounds if the person does not remove the alcohol beverage from the common consumption area or fairgrounds. This subsection (1) does not authorize a person to bring into the common consumption area or fairgrounds an alcohol beverage purchased outside of the common consumption area or fairgrounds.
- When and where specifically authorized by an ordinance adopted by the city and county of Denver and notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3, a person who purchases an alcohol beverage for consumption from a vendor licensed under this article 3 for the national western center may leave the licensed premises with the alcohol beverage and possess and consume the alcohol beverage at any place within the national western center if the person does not remove the alcohol beverage from the national western center. This subsection (2) does not authorize a person to bring into the national western center an alcohol beverage purchased outside the national western center.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1065, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: Entire section amended, (SB 19-200), ch. 307, p. 2798, § 2, effective August 2.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-908 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-910. Common consumption areas.
-
A promotional association or attached licensed premises shall not:
- Employ a person to serve alcohol beverages or provide security within the common consumption area unless the server has completed the server and seller training program established by the director of the liquor enforcement division of the department;
- Sell or provide an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption within the common consumption area but not within the licensed premises in a container that is larger than sixteen ounces;
- Sell or provide an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption within the common consumption area but not within the licensed premises unless the container is disposable and contains the name of the vendor in at least twenty-four-point font;
- Permit customers to leave the licensed premises with an alcohol beverage unless the beverage container complies with subsections (1)(b) and (1)(c) of this section;
- Operate the common consumption area during hours the licensed premises cannot sell alcohol under this article 3 or the limitations imposed by the local licensing authority;
- Operate the common consumption area in an area that exceeds the maximum authorized by this article 3 or by the local licensing authority;
- Sell, serve, dispose of, exchange, or deliver, or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of, an alcohol beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or to a known habitual drunkard;
- Sell, serve, dispose of, exchange, or deliver, or permit the sale, serving, or giving of an alcohol beverage to a person under twenty-one years of age; or
- Permit a visibly intoxicated person to loiter within the common consumption area.
- The promotional association shall promptly remove all alcohol beverages from the common consumption area at the end of the hours of operation.
- A person shall not consume an alcohol beverage within the common consumption area unless it was purchased from an attached, licensed premises.
- This section does not apply to a special event permit issued under article 5 of this title 44 or the holder thereof unless the permit holder desires to use an existing common consumption area and agrees in writing to the requirements of this article 3 and the local licensing authority concerning the common consumption area.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1065, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-909 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-911. Takeout and delivery of alcohol beverages - permit - on-premises consumption licenses - requirements and limitations - rules - definition - repeal.
-
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and subject to subsections (2) and (3) of this section:
- Between the hours of 7 a.m. and 12 midnight, a licensee may sell and deliver an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption off the licensed premises; and
-
If an alcohol beverage is part of a takeout order for consumption off the licensed premises:
- A customer may remove the alcohol beverage from the licensed premises if the alcohol beverage is in a sealed container that complies with the rules of the state licensing authority; and
- The licensee may allow a customer to remove the alcohol beverage from the licensed premises.
- Subject to subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a licensee may sell or deliver alcohol beverages under this section by the drink.
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and subject to subsections (2) and (3) of this section:
-
To sell and deliver an alcohol beverage or to allow a customer to remove an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises as either is authorized under subsection (1) of this section, the licensee must:
- Have any applicable permits issued under this section to sell alcohol beverages for takeout or delivery; except that this subsection (2)(a) does not apply if the governor has declared a disaster emergency under part 7 of article 33.5 of title 24;
-
Sell or deliver:
- The alcohol beverage only to a customer who is twenty-one years of age or older;
- The alcohol beverage in a sealed container that complies with the rules of the state licensing authority; and
-
No more than the following amounts of alcohol beverages per delivery or takeout order unless the governor has declared a disaster emergency under part 7 of article 33.5 of title 24:
- One thousand five hundred milliliters, approximately 50.8 fluid ounces, of vinous liquors;
- One hundred forty-four fluid ounces, approximately four thousand two hundred fifty-nine milliliters, of malt liquors, fermented malt beverages, and hard cider; and
- One liter, approximately 33.8 fluid ounces, of spirituous liquors.
-
Derive no more than fifty percent of its gross annual revenues from total sales of food and alcohol beverages from the sale of alcohol beverages through takeout orders and that the licensee delivers; except that:
- This subsection (2)(c) does not apply if the governor has declared a disaster emergency under part 7 of article 33.5 of title 24; or
- This subsection (2)(c) does not apply to a sales room at a premises licensed under section 44-3-402 or 44-3-407; and
- If an alcohol beverage is being delivered, use a delivery person who complies with subsection (3) of this section.
-
To deliver an alcohol beverage under this section, the delivery person must:
- Deliver the alcohol beverage to a place that is not licensed under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44;
- Be an employee of the licensee who is twenty-one years of age or older;
- Deliver an alcohol beverage only to a person who is twenty-one years of age or older; and
- Have satisfactorily completed the server and seller training program established under section 44-3-1002.
-
-
The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules:
- Specifying the types of containers that may be used for takeout or delivery of an alcohol beverage under this section;
- Creating a permit for takeout and delivery of alcohol beverages;
- Setting fees for the processing and approval of a takeout or delivery permit application; and
- Concerning any other matter necessary for the safe and effective implementation of this section.
- The state licensing authority shall issue a permit to a licensee to sell alcohol beverages for takeout and delivery if the licensee demonstrates the ability to comply with this section. A permit issued under this subsection (4)(b) is subject to the suspension and revocation provisions set forth in section 44-3-601.
-
- The local licensing authority may create a permit for takeout and delivery of alcohol beverages to implement this section. If a local licensing authority does not create a permit under this subsection (4)(c), a licensee need not obtain a local permit to sell and deliver an alcohol beverage or to allow a customer to remove an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises.
- A local licensing authority may establish fees for the processing and approval of a takeout or delivery permit application, but the amount of the fee must not exceed the amount of the fee set by the state licensing authority under subsection (4)(a)(III) of this section.
-
If a local licensing authority creates a takeout or delivery permit:
- The licensee must obtain the permit to sell and deliver an alcohol beverage or to allow a customer to remove an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises as either is authorized under subsection (1) of this section; and
- The local licensing authority shall issue a permit to a licensee to sell alcohol beverages for takeout and delivery if the licensee demonstrates the ability to comply with this section.
- A permit issued under this subsection (4)(c) is subject to the suspension and revocation provisions set forth in section 44-3-601.
- A manufacturer licensed under section 44-3-402 that operates a sales room or a wholesaler licensed under section 44-3-407 that operates a sales room need not obtain a permit from the local licensing authority to sell and deliver an alcohol beverage or to allow a customer to remove an alcohol beverage from the licensed premises.
- The licensee shall submit an application for a permit issued under this section to the state licensing authority and the local licensing authority, if applicable, simultaneously. Approval by either the state licensing authority or a local licensing authority does not guarantee approval by the other licensing authority.
-
The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules:
- For the purposes of this article 3 and article 4 of this title 44, an alcohol beverage that is sold and delivered to a customer's home for consumption off the licensed premises under this section is sold at the licensed premises.
-
-
- This section authorizes a license holder that is issued a license under one of the following sections to sell an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption off of the licensed premises: Section 44-3-402 that operates a sales room or section 44-3-407 that operates a sales room or section 44-3-411, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-422, 44-3-426, 44-3-428, 44-4-104 (1)(c)(I)(A), or 44-4-104 (1)(c)(III). (6) (a) (I) This section authorizes a license holder that is issued a license under one of the following sections to sell an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption off of the licensed premises: Section 44-3-402 that operates a sales room or section 44-3-407 that operates a sales room or section 44-3-411, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-422, 44-3-426, 44-3-428, 44-4-104 (1)(c)(I)(A), or 44-4-104 (1)(c)(III).
- This section authorizes a license holder that is issued a license under one of the following sections to deliver an alcohol beverage to a customer for consumption off of the licensed premises: Section 44-3-411, 44-3-412, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-415, 44-3-416, 44-3-417, 44-3-418, 44-3-419, 44-3-420, 44-3-421, 44-3-422, 44-3-426, or 44-3-428.
- Repealed.
-
- This section does not apply to a person issued a license or permit that is not listed in subsection (6)(a) of this section or to a caterer who is licensed to sell alcohol beverages.
-
Subsection (2)(b)(III) of this section does not apply to:
- A manufacturer licensed under section 44-3-402 that operates a sales room or a wholesaler licensed under section 44-3-407 that operates a sales room; and
- The sale of an alcohol beverage manufactured by the licensee and sold by a brew pub licensed under section 44-3-417, a vintner's restaurant licensed under section 44-3-422, or a distillery pub licensed under section 44-3-426.
-
- This section is repealed, effective July 1, 2025.
Source: L. 2020: Entire section added, (SB 20-213), ch. 262, p. 1260, § 1, effective July 10. L. 2021: (1)(a)(I), (2)(b)(III), (6)(a), and (7) amended, (HB 21-1027), ch. 290, p. 1713, § 1, effective June 22; (4)(b) amended, (SB 21-266), ch. 423, p. 2809, § 46, effective July 2.
Editor's note: Subsection (6)(a)(III) provided for the repeal of subsection (6)(a)(III), effective January 2, 2022. (See L. 2021, p. 1713.)
44-3-912. Communal outdoor dining areas - permit required - rules.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 and subject to the approval of the state and local licensing authorities, a communal outdoor dining area may be shared by two or more persons licensed for on-premises consumption, including an approved sales room, under this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44.
-
A licensee shall not sell or serve alcohol beverages in a communal outdoor dining area unless:
- The licensee obtains a permit from the state licensing authority and pays the permitting fee established by rule; and
-
The state and local licensing authorities have first approved:
- Attaching the license to the communal outdoor dining area; and
- A modification of the licensed premises of each attached licensee to include the communal outdoor dining area.
- This section does not apply to a special event permit issued under article 5 of this title 44 or the holder of the permit unless the permit holder holds a special event at an existing communal outdoor dining area and agrees in writing to the requirements of this article 3 for and the local licensing authority for the communal outdoor dining area.
- To be approved, a communal outdoor dining area must be within one thousand feet of the permanent licensed premises of each of the licenses attached to the communal outdoor dining area. This distance must be computed by direct measurement, using a route of direct pedestrian access, from the nearest property line of the land used for the communal outdoor dining area to the nearest portion of the building where the permanent licensed premises is located.
- If a violation of this article 3 or article 4 of this title 44 occurs within a communal outdoor dining area and the licensee responsible for the violation can be identified, that licensee is subject to discipline as set forth in section 44-3-601. If the licensee responsible for the violation cannot be identified, each attached licensee is deemed jointly responsible and subject to discipline for the violation.
-
The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules governing communal outdoor dining areas, including rules governing:
- Applications;
- Modification of the licensed premises to include a communal outdoor dining area;
- Supervision and control of the communal outdoor dining area by the attached licensees;
- Submission to and approval of security and control plans by the state and local licensing authorities;
- Removal of alcohol beverages from the communal outdoor dining area;
- Special events held within a communal outdoor dining area; and
- Insurance requirements.
Source: L. 2021: Entire section added, (HB 21-1027), ch. 290, p. 1715, § 3, effective June 22.
PART 10 RESPONSIBLE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE VENDOR ACT
44-3-1001. Short title.
The short title of this part 10 is the "Responsible Alcohol Beverage Vendor Act".
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1066, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-1001 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-3-1002. Responsible vendors - standards.
- To be a responsible alcohol beverage vendor, a vendor shall comply with the server and seller training program established by the director of the liquor enforcement division of the department.
- The director of the liquor enforcement division shall set standards for compliance with the server and seller training program. When creating standards, the director shall consider input from local and state government, the alcohol beverage industry, and any other state or national seller and server programs.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1066, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-47-1002 as it existed prior to 2018.
ARTICLE 4 FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGES
Editor's note: This article 4 was added with relocations in 2018. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this article 4, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.
Section
44-4-101. Short title.
The short title of this article 4 is the "Colorado Beer Code".
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1067, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-46-101 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-4-102. Legislative declaration.
- The general assembly hereby declares that it is in the public interest that fermented malt beverages shall be sold at retail only by persons licensed as provided in this article 4. The general assembly further declares that it is lawful to sell fermented malt beverages at retail subject to this article 4 and applicable provisions of articles 3 and 5 of this title 44.
- The general assembly further recognizes that fermented malt beverages and malt liquors are separate and distinct from, and have a unique regulatory history in relation to, vinous and spirituous liquors; however, maintaining a separate regulatory framework and licensing structure for fermented malt beverages under this article 4 is no longer necessary except at the retail level. Furthermore, to aid administrative efficiency, article 3 of this title 44 applies to the regulation of fermented malt beverages, except when otherwise expressly provided for in this article 4.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1067, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: Entire section amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 1, § 1, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-46-102 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-4-103. Definitions.
Definitions applicable to this article 4 also appear in article 3 of this title 44. As used in this article 4, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
- "Fermented malt beverage" means malt liquors, when purchased by a fermented malt beverage retailer from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to article 3 of this title 44; or when sold by a fermented malt beverage retailer to consumers or to persons licensed under section 44-3-411, 44-3-413, 44-3-414, 44-3-416 to 44-3-420, 44-3-422, 44-3-426, or 44-3-428.
- "Fermented malt beverage" does not include confectionery containing alcohol within the limits prescribed by section 25-5-410 (1)(i)(II).
- "License" means a grant to a licensee to sell fermented malt beverages at retail as provided by this article 4.
- "Licensed premises" means the premises specified in an application for a license under this article 4 that are owned or in possession of the licensee and within which the licensee is authorized to sell, dispense, or serve fermented malt beverages in accordance with the provisions of this article 4.
- "Local licensing authority" means the governing body of a municipality or city and county, the board of county commissioners of a county, or any authority designated by municipal or county charter, municipal ordinance, or county resolution.
- Repealed.
- "State licensing authority" means the executive director or the deputy director of the department if the executive director so designates.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1067, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: (1)(a) and (2) amended and (5) repealed, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 2, § 2, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-46-103 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-4-104. Licenses - state license fees - requirements - definition.
-
The licenses to be granted and issued by the state licensing authority pursuant to this article 4 for the retail sale of fermented malt beverages are as follows:
- Repealed.
-
-
- A retailer's license shall be granted and issued to any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation qualifying under section 44-3-301 and not prohibited from licensure under section 44-3-307 to sell at retail fermented malt beverages either for consumption off the licensed premises or for consumption on the licensed premises or, subject to subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section, for consumption on and off the licensed premises, upon paying an annual license fee of seventy-five dollars to the state licensing authority. (c) (I) (A) A retailer's license shall be granted and issued to any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation qualifying under section 44-3-301 and not prohibited from licensure under section 44-3-307 to sell at retail fermented malt beverages either for consumption off the licensed premises or for consumption on the licensed premises or, subject to subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section, for consumption on and off the licensed premises, upon paying an annual license fee of seventy-five dollars to the state licensing authority.
- A person licensed pursuant to this subsection (1)(c) to sell fermented malt beverages at retail shall purchase the fermented malt beverages only from a wholesaler licensed pursuant to article 3 of this title 44.
-
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section:
- The state licensing authority shall not issue a new or renew a fermented malt beverage retailer's license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the licensed premises; and
- Any licensee holding a fermented malt beverage license authorizing the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the licensed premises that was issued by the state licensing authority under this subsection (1)(c) before June 4, 2018, that applies to renew the license on or after June 4, 2018, and whose licensed premises is located in a county with a population of thirty-five thousand or more and not in an underserved area must simultaneously apply to convert the license either to a license for the sale of fermented malt beverages at retail for consumption off the licensed premises or to a license for the sale of fermented malt beverages at retail for consumption on the licensed premises.
-
- The state licensing authority may issue a new or renew a fermented malt beverage retailer's license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the licensed premises if the licensed premises is located in a county with a population of less than thirty-five thousand or in an underserved area.
- Repealed.
- As used in this subsection (1)(c), "underserved area" means an area that is within a county with a population of thirty-five thousand or more but lies outside of municipal boundaries or is a city or town with a population of less than seven thousand five hundred.
- For purposes of this subsection (1)(c), population is determined according to the most recently available population statistics of the United States census bureau.
-
- Repealed.
-
- Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, beginning on January 31, 2019, the state licensing authority shall not issue or renew any licenses under this section except for licenses authorized under subsection (1)(c) of this section.
-
Licenses issued by the state licensing authority under subsection (1)(a), (1)(b), or (1)(d) of this section in effect on January 31, 2019, immediately convert, on January 31, 2019, without any further act by the state licensing authority or the licensee, as follows:
- A manufacturer's license that was issued under subsection (1)(a) of this section, as it existed before January 31, 2019, converts to a manufacturer's license issued pursuant to section 44-3-402 for the manufacture of malt liquors;
- A wholesaler's license that was issued under subsection (1)(b) of this section, as it existed before January 31, 2019, converts to a wholesaler's beer license issued pursuant to section 44-3-407 (1)(b);
- A nonresident manufacturer's license that was issued under subsection (1)(d)(I) of this section, as it existed before January 31, 2019, converts to a nonresident manufacturer's license issued pursuant to section 44-3-406 (1); and
- An importer's license that was issued under subsection (1)(d)(II) of this section, as it existed before January 31, 2019, converts to a malt liquor importer's license issued pursuant to section 44-3-406 (2).
-
The conversion of a license issued under subsection (1)(a), (1)(b), or (1)(d) of this section to a license issued under article 3 of this title 44 pursuant to subsection (1)(e)(II) of this section is a continuation of the prior license issued pursuant to this article 4 and does not affect:
- Any prior discipline, limitation, or condition imposed by the state licensing authority on a licensee;
- The deadline for renewal of a license; or
- Any pending or future investigation or administrative proceeding.
- Notwithstanding the amount specified for any fee in subsection (1) of this section, the state licensing authority, by rule or as otherwise provided by law, may reduce the amount of one or more of the fees if necessary pursuant to section 24-75-402 (3) to reduce the uncommitted reserves of the fund to which all or any portion of one or more of the fees is credited. After the uncommitted reserves of the fund are sufficiently reduced, the state licensing authority, by rule or as otherwise provided by law, may increase the amount of one or more of the fees as provided in section 24-75-402 (4).
- Repealed.
- It is unlawful for any retail licensee under this article 4 to be interested financially, directly or indirectly, in the business of any manufacturer or wholesaler or any person, partnership, association, organization, or corporation interested in or with any of the manufacturers or wholesalers licensed pursuant to article 3 of this title 44.
Source: L. 2018: IP(1) and (1)(c) amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2191, § 2, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1068, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: IP(1), (1)(c)(I), and (4) amended, (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), and (3) repealed, and (1)(e) added (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 2, § 3, effective January 31; (1)(c) amended, (SB 19-028), ch. 4, p. 22, § 1, effective February 20.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-46-104 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsections IP(1) and (1)(c) of this section were numbered as § 12-46-104 IP(1) and (1)(c), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Amendments to subsection (1)(c) by SB 19-011 and SB 19-028 were harmonized.
- Subsection (1)(c)(III)(B) provided for the repeal of subsection (1)(c)(III)(B), effective September 1, 2021. (See L. 2019, p. 22.)
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
44-4-105. Fees and taxes - allocation.
-
-
-
The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
(1) (a) (I) The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
- Applications for new fermented malt beverage licenses pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules thereunder;
- Applications for change of location pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules thereunder;
- Applications for changing, altering, or modifying licensed premises pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules thereunder;
- Applications for duplicate licenses;
- Notices of change of name or trade name pursuant to section 44-3-301 and rules thereunder; and
- Applications for the renewal of a license or permit issued in accordance with this article 4.
- When added to the other fees and taxes transferred to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund under subsection (2) of this section and section 44-3-502 (1), the state licensing authority shall set the amounts of the fees imposed under this subsection (1)(a) to reflect the direct and indirect costs of the liquor enforcement division and the state licensing authority in the administration and enforcement of this article 4 and articles 3 and 5 of this title 44. At least annually, the amounts of the fees shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted to reflect these direct and indirect costs.
-
The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
(1) (a) (I) The state licensing authority shall establish fees for processing the following types of applications, notices, or reports required to be submitted to the state licensing authority:
- Except as provided in subsection (1)(c) of this section, the state licensing authority shall establish a basic fee that shall be paid at the time of service of any subpoena upon the state licensing authority or upon any employee of the division, plus a fee for meals and a fee for mileage at the rate prescribed for state officers and employees in section 24-9-104 for each mile actually and necessarily traveled in going to and returning from the place named in the subpoena. If the person named in the subpoena is required to attend the place named in the subpoena for more than one day, there shall be paid, in advance, a sum to be established by the state licensing authority for each day of attendance to cover the expenses of the person named in the subpoena.
- The subpoena fee established pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section shall not be applicable to any state or local governmental agency.
-
-
- All state license fees provided for by this article 4 and all fees provided for by subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b) of this section for processing applications, reports, and notices shall be paid to the department, which shall transmit the fees and taxes to the state treasurer. The state treasurer shall credit eighty-five percent of the fees and taxes to the old age pension fund and the balance to the general fund.
- An amount equal to the revenues attributable to fifty dollars of each state license fee provided for by this article 4 and the processing fees provided for by subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b) of this section shall be transferred out of the general fund to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund. The transfer shall be made by the state treasurer as soon as possible after the twentieth day of the month following the payment of the fees.
- The expenditures of the state licensing authority and the liquor enforcement division shall be paid out of appropriations from the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund as provided in section 44-6-101.
- Eighty-five percent of the local license fees set forth in section 44-4-107 (2) shall be paid to the department, which shall transmit the fees to the state treasurer to be credited to the old age pension fund.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1070, § 2, effective October 1; (2)(c) amended, (HB 18-1026), ch. 24, p. 281, § 4, effective October 1. L. 2019: (1)(a) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 16, § 26, effective January 31. L. 2020: (1)(a) amended, (SB 20-086), ch. 67, p. 270, § 3, effective September 14.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-46-105 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (2)(c) of this section was numbered as § 12-46-105 (2)(c) in HB 18-1026. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-4-106. Lawful acts.
-
It is lawful for a person under eighteen years of age who is under the supervision of a person on the premises eighteen years of age or older to be employed in a place of business where fermented malt beverages are sold at retail in containers for off-premises consumption. During the normal course of such employment, any person under twenty-one years of age may handle and otherwise act with respect to fermented malt beverages in the same manner as that person does with other items sold at retail; except that:
- A person under eighteen years of age shall not sell or dispense fermented malt beverages, check age identification, or make deliveries beyond the customary parking area for the customers of the retail outlet; and
- A person who is under twenty-one years of age shall not deliver fermented malt beverages in sealed containers to customers under section 44-4-107 (6).
- This section does not permit the violation of any other provisions of this section under circumstances not specified in this section.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1071, § 2, effective October 1; entire section amended, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2192, § 3, effective January 1, 2019.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-46-106 as it existed prior to 2018.
- This section was numbered as § 12-46-106 in SB 18-243. That section was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective January 1, 2019.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
44-4-107. Local licensing authority - application - fees - definitions - rules.
-
The local licensing authority shall issue only the following classes of fermented malt beverage licenses:
- Sales for consumption off the premises of the licensee;
- Sales for consumption on the premises of the licensee;
-
- Subject to subsections (1)(c)(II) and (1)(c)(III) of this section, sales for consumption both on and off the premises of the licensee.
-
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (1)(c)(III) of this section:
- A local licensing authority shall not issue a new fermented malt beverage license or renew an existing fermented malt beverage license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the licensed premises; and
- Any licensee holding a fermented malt beverage license issued under this subsection (1)(c) prior to June 4, 2018, that applies to renew the license on or after June 4, 2018, and whose licensed premises is located in a county with a population of thirty-five thousand or more and not in an underserved area must simultaneously apply to convert the license either to a license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption off the licensed premises as specified in subsection (1)(a) of this section or to a license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on the licensed premises as specified in subsection (1)(b) of this section.
-
- The local licensing authority may issue a new or renew a fermented malt beverage retailer's license for the sale of fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the licensed premises if the licensed premises is located in a county with a population of less than thirty-five thousand or in an underserved area.
- Repealed.
- As used in this subsection (1)(c), "underserved area" means an area that is within a county with a population of thirty-five thousand or more but lies outside of municipal boundaries or is a city or town with a population of less than seven thousand five hundred.
- For purposes of this subsection (1)(c), population is determined according to the most recently available population statistics of the United States census bureau.
- The local licensing authority shall collect an annual license fee of twenty-five dollars if the licensed premises is located in a municipality or city and county and fifty dollars if the licensed premises is located outside the corporate limits of a municipality or city and county.
-
- In addition to any other requirements specified in this article 4 or article 3 of this title 44, to qualify for a new license under subsection (1)(a) of this section on or after June 4, 2018, or to renew a license that was issued under subsection (1)(a) of this section on or after June 4, 2018, a person must derive at least twenty percent of its gross annual revenues from total sales from the sale of food items for consumption off the premises.
-
For purposes of calculating gross annual revenues from total sales, revenues derived from the sale of the following products are excluded:
- Fuel products, as defined in section 8-20-201 (2);
- Cigarettes, tobacco products, and nicotine products, as defined in section 18-13-121 (5); and
- Lottery products.
- The state licensing authority may adopt rules specifying the form and manner in which an applicant for a new or renewal license may demonstrate compliance with this subsection (3).
-
This subsection (3) does not apply to a person that owns or leases a proposed fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises and, as of January 1, 2019, has applied for or received from the municipality, city and county, or county in which the premises are located:
- A building permit for the structure to be used for the fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises, which permit is currently active and will not expire before the completion of the liquor licensing process; or
- A certificate of occupancy for the structure to be used for the fermented malt beverage retailer licensed premises.
- As used in this subsection (3), "food items" means any raw, cooked, or processed edible substance, ice, or beverage, other than a beverage containing alcohol, that is intended for use or for sale, in whole or in part, for human consumption.
-
On or after January 1, 2019, a fermented malt beverage retailer licensed under subsection (1)(a) of this section:
-
- Shall not sell fermented malt beverages to consumers at a price that is below the retailer's cost, as listed on the invoice, to purchase the fermented malt beverages, unless the sale is of discontinued or close-out fermented malt beverages.
- This subsection (4)(a) does not prohibit a fermented malt beverage retailer from operating a bona fide loyalty or rewards program for fermented malt beverages so long as the price for the product is not below the retailer's costs as listed on the invoice. The state licensing authority may adopt rules to implement this subsection (4)(a).
- Shall not allow consumers to purchase fermented malt beverages at a self-checkout or other mechanism that allows the consumer to complete the fermented malt beverages purchase without assistance from and completion of the entire transaction by an employee of the fermented malt beverage retailer.
-
- A person licensed under subsection (1)(a) of this section that holds multiple fermented malt beverage retailer's licenses for multiple licensed premises may operate under a single or consolidated corporate entity but shall not commingle purchases of or credit extensions for purchases of alcohol beverage product from a wholesaler licensed under article 3 of this title 44 for more than one licensed premises. A wholesaler licensed under article 3 of this title 44 shall not base the price for the alcohol beverage product it sells to a fermented malt beverage retailer licensed under subsection (1)(a) of this section on the total volume of alcohol beverage product that the retailer purchases for multiple licensed premises.
-
-
A person licensed under subsection (1)(a) of this section who complies with this subsection (6) and rules promulgated under this subsection (6) may deliver fermented malt beverages in sealed containers to a person of legal age if:
- The person receiving the delivery of fermented malt beverages is located at a place that is not licensed pursuant to this section;
- The delivery is made by an employee of the fermented malt beverage retailer who is at least twenty-one years of age and who is using a vehicle owned or leased by the licensee to make the delivery;
- The person making the delivery verifies, in accordance with section 44-3-901 (11), that the person receiving the delivery of fermented malt beverages is at least twenty-one years of age; and
- The fermented malt beverage retailer derives no more than fifty percent of its gross annual revenues from total sales of fermented malt beverages from the sale of fermented malt beverages that the fermented malt beverage retailer delivers.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules as necessary for the proper delivery of fermented malt beverages pursuant to this subsection (6) and may issue a permit to any person who is licensed pursuant to and delivers fermented malt beverages under subsection (1)(a) of this section. A permit issued under this subsection (6) is subject to the same suspension and revocation provisions as are set forth in section 44-3-601 for other licenses granted pursuant to article 3 of this title 44.
-
A person licensed under subsection (1)(a) of this section who complies with this subsection (6) and rules promulgated under this subsection (6) may deliver fermented malt beverages in sealed containers to a person of legal age if:
Source: L. 2018: (1)(c) amended and (3) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2192, § 4, effective June 4; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1072, § 2, effective October 1; (4) to (6) added, (SB 18-243), ch. 366, p. 2192, § 4, effective January 1, 2019. L. 2019: (5) amended, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 16, § 27, effective January 31; (1)(c) amended, (SB 19-028), ch. 4, p. 23, § 2, effective February 20.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-46-107 as it existed prior to 2018.
-
- Subsections (1)(c) and (3) of this section were numbered as § 12-46-107 (1)(c) and (3), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
- Subsections (4), (5), and (6) of this section were numbered as § 12-46-107 (4), (5), and (6), respectively, in SB 18-243. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025, effective January 1, 2019.
- Subsection (1)(c)(III)(B) provided for the repeal of subsection (1)(c)(III)(B), effective September 1, 2021. (See L. 2019, p. 23.)
Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 18-243, see section 1 of chapter 366, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
44-4-108. Exemption. (Repealed)
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1072, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2019: Entire section repealed, (SB 19-011), ch. 1, p. 17, § 28, effective January 31.
Editor's note: This section was similar to former § 12-46-108 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-4-109. Liquor industry working group - creation - duties - report - repeal. (Repealed)
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1072, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section was similar to former § 12-46-109 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsection (4) provided for the repeal of this section, effective July 1, 2019. (See L. 2016, p. 1528.)
ARTICLE 5 SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR PERMITS
Editor's note: This article 5 was added with relocations in 2018. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this article 5, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.
Section
44-5-101. Special licenses authorized.
- The state or local licensing authority, as defined in articles 3 and 4 of this title 44, may issue a special event permit for the sale, by the drink only, of fermented malt beverages, as defined in section 44-4-103, or the sale, by the drink only, of malt, spirituous, or vinous liquors, as defined in section 44-3-103, to organizations and political candidates qualifying under this article 5, subject to the applicable provisions of articles 3 and 4 of this title 44 and to the limitations imposed by this article 5.
- For purposes of this article 5, a state institution of higher education includes each principal campus of a state system of higher education.
Source: L. 2018: Entire section amended, (HB 18-1096), ch. 33, p. 369, § 1, effective August 8; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1074, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-48-101 as it existed prior to 2018.
- This section was numbered as § 12-48-101 in HB 18-1096. That section was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-5-102. Qualifications for permit.
-
A special event permit issued under this article 5 may be issued to:
-
An organization, whether or not presently licensed under articles 3 and 4 of this title 44, that:
- Has been incorporated under the laws of this state for purposes of a social, fraternal, patriotic, political, educational, or athletic nature, and not for pecuniary gain;
- Is a regularly chartered branch, lodge, or chapter of a national organization or society organized for the purposes specified in subsection (1)(a)(I) of this section and is nonprofit in nature;
- Is a regularly established religious or philanthropic institution; or
- Is a state institution of higher education;
- A political candidate who has filed the necessary reports and statements with the secretary of state pursuant to article 45 of title 1; or
- Any municipality, county, or special district.
-
An organization, whether or not presently licensed under articles 3 and 4 of this title 44, that:
- Repealed.
-
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, and subject to this article 5, the state or local licensing authority may issue a special event permit to a state agency, the Colorado wine industry development board, created in section 35-29.5-103, or an instrumentality of a municipality or county that promotes:
- Alcohol beverages manufactured in the state; or
- Tourism in an area of the state where alcohol beverages are manufactured.
Source: L. 2018: (1) amended and (2) repealed, (HB 18-1096), ch. 33, p. 369, § 2, effective August 8; entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1074, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 12-48-102 as it existed prior to 2018.
- Subsections (1) and (2) of this section were numbered as § 12-48-102 (1) and (2), respectively, in HB 18-1096. Those provisions were harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1025.
44-5-103. Grounds for issuance of special permits.
-
- A special event permit may be issued under this section notwithstanding the fact that the special event is to be held on premises licensed under the provisions of section 44-3-403, 44-3-404, 44-3-413 (3), 44-3-418, 44-3-419, or 44-3-424. The holder of a special event permit issued pursuant to this subsection (1) is responsible for any violation of article 3 of this title 44.
- If a violation of this article 5 or article 3 of this title 44 occurs during a special event festival and the responsible licensee can be identified, the state or local licensing authority may charge and impose appropriate penalties on the licensee. If the responsible licensee cannot be identified, the state licensing authority may send written notice to every licensee identified on the permit applications and may fine each the same dollar amount. The fine shall not exceed twenty-five dollars per licensee or two hundred dollars in the aggregate. A joint fine levied pursuant to this subsection (1)(b) does not apply to the revocation of a licensee's license under section 44-3-601.
- Nothing in this article 5 shall be construed to prohibit the sale or dispensing of malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors on any closed street, highway, or public byway for which a special event permit has been issued.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1075, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2021: (1)(b) amended, (SB 21-082), ch. 195, p. 1046, § 3, effective September 7.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-103 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-104. Fees for special permits.
-
Special event permit fees are:
- Ten dollars per day for a malt beverage permit;
- Twenty-five dollars per day for a malt, vinous, and spirituous liquor permit.
- All fees are payable in advance to the department for applications for special event permits submitted to the state licensing authority for approval.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1075, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-104 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-105. Restrictions related to permits.
- Each special event permit shall be issued for a specific location and is not valid for any other location.
-
A special event permit authorizes sale of the beverage or the liquors specified only during the following hours:
- Between the hours of five a.m. of the day specified in a malt beverage permit and until twelve midnight on the same day;
- Between the hours of seven a.m. of the day specified in a malt, vinous, and spirituous liquor permit and until two a.m. of the day immediately following.
- The state or a local licensing authority shall not issue a special event permit to any organization for more than fifteen days in one calendar year.
- No issuance of a special event permit shall have the effect of requiring the state or local licensing authority to issue such a permit upon any subsequent application by an organization.
- Sandwiches or other food snacks shall be available during all hours of service of malt, spirituous, or vinous liquors, but prepared meals need not be served.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1075, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-105 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-106. Grounds for denial of special permit.
- The state or local licensing authority may deny the issuance of a special event permit upon the grounds that the issuance would be injurious to the public welfare because of the nature of the special event, its location within the community, or the failure of the applicant in a past special event to conduct the event in compliance with applicable laws.
- Public notice of the proposed permit and of the procedure for protesting issuance of the permit shall be conspicuously posted at the proposed location for at least ten days before approval of the permit by the local licensing authority.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1076, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-106 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-107. Applications for special permit.
- Applications for a special event permit shall be made with the appropriate local licensing authority on forms provided by the state licensing authority and shall be verified by oath or affirmation of an officer of the organization or of the political candidate making application.
- In addition to the fees provided in section 44-5-104, an applicant shall include payment of a fee established by the local licensing authority, not to exceed one hundred dollars, for both investigation and issuance of a permit. Upon approval of any application, the local licensing authority shall notify the state licensing authority of the approval, except as provided by subsection (5) of this section. The state licensing authority shall promptly act and either approve or disapprove the application. In reviewing an application, the local licensing authority shall apply the same standards for approval and denial applicable to the state licensing authority under this article 5.
- The local licensing authority shall cause a hearing to be held if, after investigation and upon review of the contents of any protest filed by affected persons, sufficient grounds appear to exist for denial of a permit. Any protest shall be filed by affected persons within ten days after the date of notice pursuant to section 44-5-106 (2). Any hearing required by this subsection (3) or any hearing held at the discretion of the local licensing authority shall be held at least ten days after the initial posting of the notice, and notice thereof shall be provided to the applicant and any person who has filed a protest.
- The local licensing authority may assign all or any portion of its functions under this article 5 to an administrative officer.
-
- A local licensing authority may elect not to notify the state licensing authority to obtain the state licensing authority's approval or disapproval of an application for a special event permit. The local licensing authority is required only to report to the liquor enforcement division, within ten days after it issues a permit, the name of the organization to which a permit was issued, the address of the permitted location, and the permitted dates of alcohol beverage service.
- A local licensing authority electing not to notify the state licensing authority shall promptly act upon each application and either approve or disapprove each application for a special event permit.
- The state licensing authority shall establish and maintain a website containing the statewide permitting activity of organizations that receive permits under this article 5. In order to ensure compliance with section 44-5-105 (3), which restricts the number of permits issued to an organization in a calendar year, the local licensing authority shall access information made available on the website of the state licensing authority to determine the statewide permitting activity of the organization applying for the permit. The local licensing authority shall consider compliance with section 44-5-105 (3) before approving any application.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1076, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-107 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-108. Exemptions.
An organization otherwise qualifying under section 44-5-102 shall be exempt from the provisions of this article 5 and shall be deemed to be dispensing gratuitously and not to be selling fermented malt beverages or malt, spirituous, or vinous liquors when it serves, by the drink, fermented malt beverages or malt, spirituous, or vinous liquors to its members and their guests at a private function held by the organization on unlicensed premises, so long as any admission or other charge, if any, required to be paid or given by any such member as a condition to entry or participation in the event is uniform as to all without regard to whether or not a member or such member's guest consumes or does not consume such beverages or liquors. For purposes of this section, all invited attendees at a private function held by a state institution of higher education shall be considered members or guests of the institution.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1025), ch. 152, p. 1077, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-48-108 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-5-109. Alcohol beverages obtained for a special event - authority of club licensee to commingle with inventory.
If a person licensed under section 44-3-418 purchases alcohol beverages from a wholesaler for purposes of a special event held on the licensee's premises, the licensee is not required to store the alcohol beverages purchased for the special event separately from the licensee's inventory.
Source: L. 2021: Entire section added, (SB 21-133), ch. 112, p. 440, § 1, effective September 7.
ARTICLE 6 LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION AND STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY CASH FUND
Editor's note: This article 6 was added with relocations in 2018. The former C.R.S. section number is shown in the editor's note following the section that was relocated.
Section
44-6-101. Liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund.
There is hereby created in the state treasury the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund. The fund consists of money transferred in accordance with sections 44-3-502 (1), 44-4-105 (2), and 44-7-104.5 (6). The general assembly shall make annual appropriations from the fund for a portion of the direct and indirect costs of the liquor enforcement division and the state licensing authority in the administration and enforcement of articles 3 to 5 and 7 of this title 44. Any money remaining in the fund at the end of each fiscal year remains in the fund and does not revert to the general fund or any other fund. The fund shall be maintained in accordance with section 24-75-402.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (HB 18-1026), ch. 24, p. 280, § 2, effective October 1; entire section amended, (HB 18-1025), ch 152, p. 1079, § 11, effective October 1. L. 2020: Entire section amended, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1517, § 16, effective July 14.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former § 24-35-401 as it existed prior to 2018.
- This section was numbered as § 24-35-401 in HB 18-1025. That section was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in HB 18-1026.
ARTICLE 7 REGULATION OF TOBACCO SALES
Editor's note: This article 7 was added with relocations in 2018. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this article 7, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.
Section
44-7-101. Legislative declaration.
-
The general assembly finds that:
- The use of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products creates dangerous risks to the health of the people of the state of Colorado;
- Studies have shown that most people who use cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products started using them before the age of eighteen; and
- The costs of health care for persons suffering from diseases caused by the use of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products are borne by all people of the state of Colorado.
- The general assembly also recognizes that federal regulations now require states, through designated state agencies, to develop programs to reduce the use of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products by minors as demonstrated by random inspection of businesses that sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products at retail.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 372, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-501 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-102. Definitions.
As used in this article 7, unless the context otherwise requires:
- "Cigarette, tobacco product, or nicotine product" has the same meaning as provided in section 18-13-121 (5).
-
- "Distributor" means a person who sells or distributes cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to licensed retailers in this state.
- "Distributor" includes a "distributor" or "distributing subcontractor" as those terms are defined in section 39-28.5-101.
- "Division" means the division of liquor enforcement within the department.
- "Electronic smoking device" has the meaning set forth in section 25-14-203 (4.5).
- "Hearing officer" means a person designated by the executive director to conduct hearings held pursuant to section 44-7-105.
- "Local authority" means the governing body of a local government or any authority designated by a municipal or county charter, municipal ordinance, or county resolution to regulate retailers.
- "Local government" means a statutory or home rule municipality, county, or city and county.
- "Minor" means a person under twenty-one years of age.
- "New retail location" means a retail location in the state at which cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products were not sold before July 14, 2020.
- "Retailer" means the owner or operator of a business of any kind at a specific location that sells cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to a user or consumer.
- "School" has the meaning set forth in section 44-3-103 (50).
- "State license" means a license issued by the division in accordance with section 44-7-104.5.
-
- "Wholesaler" means a person engaged in the wholesale distribution of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products in this state.
- "Wholesaler" includes a "wholesaler" and "wholesale subcontractor" as those terms are defined in section 39-28-101.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 373, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: Entire section amended, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1505, § 6, effective July 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-502 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-103. Sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to persons under twenty-one years of age or in vending machines prohibited - warning sign - small quantity sales prohibited - rules.
- A retailer shall not sell or permit the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to a minor; except that it is not a violation if the retailer establishes that the person selling the cigarette, tobacco product, or nicotine product was presented with and reasonably relied upon a valid government-issued photographic identification, as determined by the executive director by rule, that identified the person purchasing the cigarette, tobacco product, or nicotine product as being twenty-one years of age or older. A retailer shall require an individual who seeks to purchase cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products and who appears to be under fifty years of age to present to the retailer a valid government-issued photographic identification at the time of purchase.
- A retailer shall not sell or offer to sell any cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products by use of a vending machine or other coin-operated machine; except that cigarettes may be sold at retail through vending machines only in an age-restricted area of a licensed gaming establishment, as defined in section 44-30-103 (18).
- Any person who sells or offers to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products shall display a warning sign as specified in this subsection (3). The warning sign must be displayed in a prominent place in the building and on any vending or coin-operated machine at all times, must have a minimum height of three inches and a width of six inches, and must read as follows:
-
No retailer shall sell or offer to sell individual cigarettes, or any pack or container of cigarettes containing fewer than twenty cigarettes, or roll-your-own tobacco in any package containing less than 0.60 ounces of tobacco.
(4.5) A retailer shall not permit a person under eighteen years of age to sell or participate in the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products. This section does not prohibit an employee of a retailer who is eighteen years of age or older but under twenty-one years of age from handling or otherwise having any contact with cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products that are offered for sale at the retailer's business.
- Nothing in this section affects federal laws concerning cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products, as they apply to military bases and Indian reservations within the state.
WARNING
IT IS ILLEGAL TO SELL CIGARETTES, TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR NICOTINE PRODUCTS TO ANY PERSON UNDER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF AGE. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT, TO PURCHASE CIGARETTES, TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OR NICOTINE PRODUCTS AT THIS RETAIL LOCATION, A PERSON MUST PRESENT A VALID GOVERNMENT-ISSUED PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE IF THE PERSON APPEARS TO BE UNDER FIFTY YEARS OF AGE.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 373, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: (1), (2), and (3) amended and (4.5) added, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1506, § 7, effective July 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-503 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-104. Enforcement authority - designation of agency - coordination - sharing of information - rules.
- The division has the power to enforce all state statutes relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors. The division is designated as the lead state agency for the enforcement of state statutes in compliance with federal laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors.
- The division shall coordinate the enforcement of state laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors by multiple state agencies to avoid duplicative inspections of the same retailer by multiple state agencies.
-
- The division shall work with the department of human services and the department of public health and environment to ensure compliance with federal regulations for continued receipt of all federal funds contingent upon compliance with laws related to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors.
-
- To the degree that is achievable within the amount of fees collected, each year, the division shall perform, cause to be performed, or coordinate with a local authority in the performance of at least two compliance checks at each retail location at which cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products are sold or at least the minimum number of annual compliance checks required by federal regulations, whichever is greater. The division shall perform a compliance check by engaging a person under twenty-one years of age to enter a retail location to purchase cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products.
- If a compliance check of a retail location performed pursuant to subsection (3)(b)(I) of this section reveals a violation of this article 7, the division, or a local authority in coordination with the division pursuant to section 44-7-104.5 (4)(c), shall conduct an additional compliance check of the retail location within three to six months after the compliance check at which the violation was discovered.
- In order to pay for the inspections required by subsection (3)(b) of this section, the division shall apply for a grant from the tobacco education, prevention, and cessation program established in part 8 of article 3.5 of title 25.
- In order to enforce laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors, the department of revenue shall maintain and publish on the division's public website the business names and addresses of state-licensed retailers that sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products and may share the list or information included in the list with any state or local agency responsible for the enforcement of laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors.
-
-
To ensure the protection of public health, the executive director shall promulgate rules concerning the division's enforcement of this article 7, including rules:
- To set necessary and reasonable fee amounts that will cover the direct and indirect cost of enforcement and administration; except that the fee amount must not exceed four hundred dollars per year. The executive director may by rule increase the maximum fee amount to six hundred dollars if the division determines that statewide compliance with this article 7 falls below ninety percent.
- For retailers with more than ten retail locations under the same corporate or business entity, that allow the corporate or business entity to pay a single, large-operator license fee instead of paying a separate fee for each retail location. Notwithstanding subsection (5)(a)(I) of this section, the fee amount must be sufficient to cover the division's direct and indirect costs of enforcing and administering this article 7 in relation to a large operator. Nothing in this subsection (5)(a)(II) prevents the division from enforcing this article 7 on a per-retail location basis.
- In accordance with subsections (2) and (3)(b) of this section, regarding the number and manner of compliance checks of retail locations that the division shall perform, cause to be performed, or coordinate with a local authority in the performance of each year. The rules must ensure that any coordination between the division and a local authority on the performance of compliance checks satisfies federal requirements and that local authorities apprise the division in an appropriate form and manner of compliance checks conducted.
- To ensure that complaints received by the division are forwarded to the appropriate local authority and that complaints received by the local authority are forwarded to the division for the timely investigation into and action taken on the complaints. The rules must ensure that local authorities apprise the division of complaints and any action taken on those complaints.
- Regarding retailers' obligations to comply with the division's document production requests related to implementation and enforcement of this article 7.
- The executive director may promulgate rules authorizing a person to apply for a temporary state license and requiring the payment of a temporary state license fee. If the executive director promulgates such rules, the rules must specify that the temporary state license remains in effect for no more than thirty days and is not renewable.
- In promulgating rules pursuant to this subsection (5), the executive director may consult with the department of human services, the department of public health and environment, local governments, and any other state or local agencies the executive director deems appropriate.
- On or before July 1, 2021, the executive director shall, in consultation with licensed wholesalers and retailers, promulgate rules regarding the targeted enforcement against the smuggling of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products.
-
To ensure the protection of public health, the executive director shall promulgate rules concerning the division's enforcement of this article 7, including rules:
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 374, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: (3)(b) and (4) amended and (5) added, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1507, § 8, effective July 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-504 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-104.5. License required - fees - rules.
-
-
- On or after July 1, 2021, a retailer doing business in this state shall not sell or offer for sale cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products in this state without first obtaining a state license as a retailer from the division. (1) (a) (I) On or after July 1, 2021, a retailer doing business in this state shall not sell or offer for sale cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products in this state without first obtaining a state license as a retailer from the division.
- A state license is valid for one year and may be renewed by application in the form and manner prescribed by the division and by payment of a fee set by rule pursuant to section 44-7-104 (5)(a)(I).
-
An owner of multiple retail locations in the state at which cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products are sold or offered for sale must apply for a separate state license for each retail location. If the executive director wishes to authorize an owner of multiple retail locations in the state to apply simultaneously for state licenses for each retail location owned by submitting a joint application, the executive director may establish by rule:
- The process by which the owner may apply for state licenses for multiple retail locations in a joint application; and
- A joint application fee.
-
-
- Except as provided in subsection (4)(b) of this section, the division shall approve or deny a state license application within sixty days after receiving the application. The division may deny an application only for good cause. If the division denies an application, the division shall inform the applicant in writing of the reasons for the denial, and the applicant, within fourteen days after receiving the written denial, may request that a hearing be held on the matter in accordance with section 44-7-105.
- Repealed.
-
- Upon obtaining a state license from the division for a retail location, a retailer shall conspicuously display the state license at the retail location.
-
- State licenses are not transferable. If a licensee ceases to be a retailer at a retail location by reason of discontinuation, sale, or transfer of the licensee's business, the licensee shall notify the division in writing on or before the date on which the discontinuance, sale, or transfer takes effect.
- If a person to whom a retailer's retail location is sold applies for a state license for the retail location within thirty days after taking ownership of the retail location, which date of taking ownership must be demonstrated in the application in a manner determined by the division, the person may continue to sell or offer to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a state license during the pendency of the division's review of the person's state license application.
-
- If a local government imposes licensing requirements on retailers, the licensing requirements must be as stringent as, and may be more stringent than, the statewide licensing requirements set forth in this article 7.
-
If a retailer applies for a state license from the division pursuant to this section for a retail location that is within the jurisdiction of a local government that imposes licensing requirements on retailers, the division shall:
- Issue a state license to the retailer upon the retailer demonstrating to the division that the retailer has obtained a local license and paying the state license fee; and
-
- Except as provided in subsection (4)(b)(II)(B) of this section, set the state license renewal date on the same date as the local license renewal date. The division shall prorate the initial state license fee if setting the state license renewal date in line with the local license renewal date requires renewal within less than twelve months after the initial state license was issued.
- If a local government first imposes a local licensing requirement on cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products on or after July 1, 2021, the local government shall set the local license renewal date for a retailer on the same date as the state license renewal date.
- The division shall collaborate with any local authority regarding the performance of compliance checks and complaints received in accordance with rules promulgated by the executive director pursuant to section 44-7-104 (5)(a)(III).
-
- Ninety days before the expiration date of an existing state license, the division shall notify the licensee of the expiration date of the state license by electronic mail or by first-class mail, as determined by the executive director, at the mailing address that the division has on file for the licensee. The division shall establish a process for a licensee to confirm receipt of a notice sent pursuant to this subsection (5)(a). The division shall describe the confirmation process in the notice itself and on the division's website.
- If the state license concerns a retail location that is located within the jurisdiction of a local authority that imposes licensing requirements on retailers, the division shall renew the licensee's state license upon the licensee demonstrating to the division that the licensee is operating under a valid local license and paying the renewal state license fee.
-
If the retailer's state license concerns a retail location that is located within the jurisdiction of a local authority that imposes licensing requirements on retailers and the local authority:
- Suspends the retailer's local license, the division shall, pursuant to the notice and hearing process set forth in section 44-7-105 (1)(b), suspend the retailer's state license until the retailer can demonstrate to the division's satisfaction that the local license has been reinstated; or
- Revokes the retailer's local license, the division shall, pursuant to the notice and hearing process set forth in section 44-7-105 (1)(b), revoke the retailer's state license.
- The division shall transfer any fees collected in accordance with this article 7 to the state treasurer, who shall credit the fees to the liquor enforcement division and state licensing authority cash fund created in section 44-6-101.
Source: L. 2020: Entire section added, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1509, § 9, effective July 14.
Editor's note: Subsection (2)(b)(II) provided for the repeal of subsection (2)(b), effective July 1, 2022. (See L. 2020, p. 1509.)
44-7-104.7. Restrictions on sales - minimum distance requirement - advertising restriction - online sales prohibited - exemptions - rules.
-
- Unless a local authority has approved an application for a new retail location pursuant to an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to subsection (1)(d) of this section, the division shall not approve a state license application for the new retail location if the new retail location is located within five hundred feet of a school. The distance between the new retail location and the school is measured from the nearest property line of land used for school purposes to the nearest portion of the building where cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products will be sold, using a route of direct pedestrian access.
- This subsection (1) does not apply to retail locations at which cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products were sold before July 14, 2020.
- If a retail location that was in existence as of July 14, 2020, is transferred to a new owner after July 14, 2020, the new owner need not comply with this subsection (1).
-
A local authority may by ordinance or resolution:
- Eliminate one or more types of schools from the distance restriction set forth in subsection (1)(a) of this section; or
- Adopt shorter distance restrictions.
- A retailer shall not advertise an electronic smoking device product in a manner that is visible from outside the retail location at which the product is offered for sale.
-
- Except as provided in subsection (3)(b) or (3)(c) of this section, a person shall not ship or deliver cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products directly to a consumer in this state.
-
-
A retailer licensed to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products pursuant to this article 7 that complies with this subsection (3)(b) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3)(b) may deliver cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to a person twenty-one years of age or older if:
- The person receiving the delivery of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products is located at a place that is not licensed pursuant to this article 7;
- The delivery is made by an owner or employee of the licensed retailer who is at least twenty-one years of age; and
- The person making the delivery verifies that the person receiving the delivery is twenty-one years of age or older by requiring the person receiving the delivery to present a valid government-issued photographic identification. The licensee or employee shall make a determination from the information presented whether the person receiving the delivery is twenty-one years of age or older.
- The executive director shall promulgate rules as necessary for the proper delivery of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products, and the division is authorized to issue a permit to any retailer that is licensed under this article 7 and delivers cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products pursuant to this subsection (3)(b). A permit issued under this subsection (3)(b) is subject to the same suspension and revocation provisions as are set forth in section 44-7-105 (1)(b).
-
A retailer licensed to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products pursuant to this article 7 that complies with this subsection (3)(b) and rules promulgated pursuant to this subsection (3)(b) may deliver cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to a person twenty-one years of age or older if:
- The prohibition set forth in subsection (3)(a) of this section does not apply to the direct shipment or delivery of cigars and pipe tobacco to a consumer who is twenty-one years of age or older.
Source: L. 2020: Entire section added, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1511, § 10, effective July 14.
44-7-105. Enforcement - fines - suspension and revocation - injunctive relief - hearings - appeals.
-
-
- Subject to the fine limitations contained in section 44-7-106, the division, on its own motion or on a complaint from another governmental agency responsible for the enforcement of laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors, may penalize retailers for violations of this article 7. (1) (a) (I) Subject to the fine limitations contained in section 44-7-106, the division, on its own motion or on a complaint from another governmental agency responsible for the enforcement of laws relating to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors, may penalize retailers for violations of this article 7.
- The division, in the name of the people of the state of Colorado and through the attorney general of the state of Colorado, may apply for an injunction in any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin any person from committing an act prohibited by this article 7. If the division establishes that the defendant has been or is committing an act prohibited by this article 7, the court shall enter a decree enjoining the defendant from further committing the act. An injunctive proceeding may be brought pursuant to this article 7 in addition to, and not in lieu of, penalties and other remedies provided in this article 7 and the rules promulgated pursuant to this article 7 or otherwise provided by law.
- In addition to any other sanctions prescribed by this article 7 or rules promulgated pursuant to this article 7, the division may, after investigation and a public hearing at which a retailer must be afforded an opportunity to be heard, fine a retailer or, if the retailer holds a state license, suspend or revoke the retailer's state license for a violation of this article 7 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 7 committed by the retailer or by any agent or employee of the retailer.
-
-
- A retailer accused of violating this article 7 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 7 is entitled to written notice of the time and place of the hearing personally delivered to the retailer at the actual retail location or mailed to the retailer at the last-known address as shown by the records of the division. The retailer is also entitled to be represented by counsel, to present evidence, and to cross-examine witnesses.
- A retailer that does not claim an affirmative defense pursuant to section 44-7-106 (2) may waive its right to a hearing and pay the appropriate fine.
- A hearing pursuant to this section shall be conducted at a location designated by the division before a hearing officer. The hearing officer may administer oaths and issue subpoenas to require the presence of persons and the production of documents relating to any alleged violation of this article 7 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 7.
- If the hearing officer finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the retailer violated this article 7 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 7, the hearing officer may issue a written order to suspend or revoke the retailer's state license or to levy a fine against the retailer in accordance with section 44-7-106.
- The decision of the hearing officer is a final agency action. Any appeal of the decision of the hearing officer shall be filed with a district court of competent jurisdiction.
- Any unpaid fine levied pursuant to this section, together with reasonable attorney fees, may be collected in a civil action filed by the attorney general.
- The division shall forward any fines collected for violations of this article 7 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 7 to the state treasurer, who shall credit them to the cigarette, tobacco product, and nicotine product use by minors prevention fund created in section 44-7-107.
- Nothing in this section or section 44-7-106 prohibits a local government from imposing sanctions on a retailer for a violation of a local ordinance or resolution.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 375, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: Entire section amended, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1513, § 11, effective July 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-505 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-106. Limitation on fines.
-
-
For a violation of section 44-7-103 (1), the penalty is as follows:
- A fine in an amount of at least two hundred fifty dollars but not more than five hundred dollars for a first violation committed within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine in an amount of at least five hundred dollars but not more than seven hundred fifty dollars for a second violation within a twenty-four-month period and a prohibition against the retailer selling cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products at the retail location at which the violation occurred for at least seven days following the date that the fine is imposed;
- A fine in an amount of at least seven hundred fifty dollars but not more than one thousand dollars for a third violation within a twenty-four-month period and a prohibition against the retailer selling cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products at the retail location at which the violation occurred for at least thirty days following the date that the fine is imposed; and
- A fine in an amount of at least one thousand dollars but not more than fifteen thousand dollars for a fourth or subsequent violation within a twenty-four-month period and a prohibition against the retailer selling cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products at the retail location at which the violation occurred for up to three years following the date that the fine is imposed.
-
For a violation of section 44-7-103 (4), the penalty is as follows:
- A written warning for a first violation committed within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine of two hundred fifty dollars for a second violation within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine of five hundred dollars for a third violation within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine of one thousand dollars for a fourth violation within a twenty-four-month period; and
- A fine of at least one thousand dollars but not more than fifteen thousand dollars for a fifth or subsequent violation within a twenty-four-month period.
-
-
On or after July 1, 2021, a person who sells or offers to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a valid state license issued pursuant to this section is subject to the following civil fines for each retail location at which the person sells or offers to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a valid state license:
- One thousand dollars for the first violation;
- Two thousand dollars for the second violation within twenty-four months; and
- Three thousand dollars for the third or subsequent violation within twenty-four months.
- Each sale of or offer to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a valid state license is a distinct violation of this section subject to a fine.
- If the division finds that a retailer has violated this subsection (1)(c) three times within twenty-four months, the division shall issue the retailer an order prohibiting the retailer from selling cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products, which order renders the retailer ineligible to apply for a state license for three years following the date of the order.
- The fine amounts set forth in subsection (1)(c)(I) of this section also apply to violations of section 44-7-104.7 (2) and (3).
-
On or after July 1, 2021, a person who sells or offers to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a valid state license issued pursuant to this section is subject to the following civil fines for each retail location at which the person sells or offers to sell cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products without a valid state license:
-
For a violation of section 44-7-103 (1), the penalty is as follows:
-
Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, a fine for a violation of section 44-7-103 (1) shall not be imposed upon a retailer that can establish an affirmative defense to the satisfaction of the division or the hearing officer that, prior to the date of the violation, it:
- Had adopted and enforced a written policy against selling cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to persons under twenty-one years of age;
- Had informed its employees of the applicable laws regarding the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to persons under twenty-one years of age;
- Required employees to verify the age of cigarette, tobacco product, or nicotine product customers by way of photographic identification; and
- Had established and imposed disciplinary sanctions for noncompliance.
- The affirmative defense established in subsection (2) of this section may be used by a retailer only once at each location within any twenty-four-month period.
-
-
- The penalty for a violation of section 44-7-103 (2) or (4.5) is a fine of twenty-five dollars for a first violation committed within a twenty-four-month period. (4) (a) (I) The penalty for a violation of section 44-7-103 (2) or (4.5) is a fine of twenty-five dollars for a first violation committed within a twenty-four-month period.
- The penalty for a violation of section 44-7-103 (3) is a written warning for a first violation committed within a twenty-four-month period.
-
For a violation of section 44-7-103 (2), (3), or (4.5), the penalty is as follows:
- A fine of fifty dollars for a second violation within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine of one hundred dollars for a third violation within a twenty-four-month period;
- A fine of two hundred fifty dollars for a fourth violation within a twenty-four-month period; and
- A fine of at least two hundred fifty dollars but not more than one thousand dollars for a fifth or subsequent violation within a twenty-four-month period.
-
- Notwithstanding subsection (3) of this section, a licensed gaming establishment, as defined in section 44-30-103 (18) that has a cigar-tobacco bar, as defined in section 25-14-203 (4), on July 14, 2020, shall be afforded two affirmative defenses within a twenty-four-month period.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 375, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2020: Entire section amended, (HB 20-1001), ch. 302, p. 1514, § 12, effective July 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-506 as it existed prior to 2018.
44-7-107. Cigarette, tobacco product, and nicotine product use by minors prevention fund - grants.
- There is hereby created in the state treasury the cigarette, tobacco product, and nicotine product use by minors prevention fund, referred to in this section as the "fund". Money in the fund is subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly. Any interest derived from the deposit and investment of money in the fund remains in the fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered money remaining in the fund at the end of any fiscal year remains in the fund and does not revert or transfer to the general fund or any other fund of the state.
- Subject to annual appropriations by the general assembly, the department of human services may make grants from the fund to programs designed to develop training materials for retailers related to the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products to minors or to programs designed to prevent the use of cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products by minors.
Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-036), ch. 34, p. 377, § 2, effective October 1.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 24-35-507 as it existed prior to 2018.
MARIJUANA REGULATION
ARTICLE 10 REGULATED MARIJUANA
Editor's note: This article 10 was added with relocations in 2020. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this article 10, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.
Cross references: For the medical marijuana program and medical review board, see § 25-1.5-106.
Law reviews: For article, "The New, More Regulated Frontier for Medical Marijuana", see 39 C olo. Law. 29 (Nov. 2010); for article, " C olorado's Emerging Medical Marijuana Legal Framework and Constitutional Rights", see 40 Colo. Law. 69 (Nov. 2011); for article, "Employment Law and Medical Marijuana: An Uncertain Relationship", see 41 Colo. Law. 57 (Jan. 2012); for article, "Amendment 64: Five Years Later", see 46 Colo. Law. 34 (Oct. 2017); for article, "Colorado Marijuana Regulation Five Years Later: Have We Learned Anything at All?", see 96 Denv. L. Rev. 221 (2019); for article, "Risking a Contact High: The Tenth Circuit's Failure to Defer to Colorado's Marijuana Laws", see 98 Denv. L. Rev. 265 (2021).
Section
PART 1 COLORADO MARIJUANA CODE
44-10-101. Short title.
The short title of this article 10 is the "Colorado Marijuana Code".
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2824, § 5, effective January 1, 2020.
44-10-102. Legislative declaration.
- The general assembly hereby declares that this article 10 is deemed an exercise of the police powers of the state for the protection of the economic and social welfare and the health, peace, and morals of the people of this state.
- The general assembly further declares that it is unlawful under state law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell, or test medical marijuana and medical marijuana products, except in compliance with the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions in section 14 of article XVIII of the state constitution and this article 10 or when acting as a primary caregiver in compliance with the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions of section 25-1.5-106.
- The general assembly further declares that it is unlawful under state law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, or sell retail marijuana and retail marijuana products, except in compliance with the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions in section 16 of article XVIII of the state constitution and this article 10.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2824, § 5, effective January 1, 2020.
Editor's note: This is similar to former §§ 44-11-102 and 44-12-102 as they existed prior to 2020.
44-10-103. Definitions - rules.
As used in this article 10, unless the context otherwise requires:
- "Accelerator cultivator" means a social equity licensee qualified to participate in the accelerator program established pursuant to this article 10 and authorized pursuant to rule to exercise the privileges of a retail marijuana cultivation facility on the premises of an accelerator-endorsed retail marijuana cultivation facility licensee.
- "Accelerator-endorsed licensee" means a retail marijuana cultivation facility licensee, retail marijuana products manufacturer licensee, or retail marijuana store who has, pursuant to rule, been endorsed to host and offer technical and capital support to a social equity licensee pursuant to the requirements of the accelerator program established pursuant to this article 10.
- Repealed.
-
"Accelerator manufacturer" means a social equity licensee qualified to participate in the accelerator program established pursuant to this article 10 and authorized pursuant to rule to exercise the privileges of a retail marijuana products manufacturer on the premises of an accelerator-endorsed retail marijuana products manufacturing licensee.
(4.5) "Accelerator store" means a social equity licensee qualified to participate in the accelerator program established pursuant to this article 10 and authorized pursuant to rule to exercise the privileges of a retail marijuana store on the premises of an accelerator-endorsed retail marijuana store licensee.
- "Acquire", when used in connection with the acquisition of an owner's interest of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business, means obtaining ownership, control, power to vote, or sole power of disposition of the owner's interest, directly or indirectly or through one or more transactions or subsidiaries, through purchase, assignment, transfer, exchange, succession, or other means.
-
"Acting in concert" means knowing participation in a joint activity or interdependent conscious parallel action toward a common goal, whether or not pursuant to an express agreement.
(6.5) "Adverse weather event" means:
- Damaging weather, which involves a drought, a freeze, hail, excessive moisture, excessive wind, or a tornado;
- An adverse natural occurrence, which involves an earthquake, wildfire, or flood; or
- Any additional adverse weather event or adverse natural occurrence as the state licensing authority may define by rule.
- "Advertising" means the act of providing consideration for the publication, dissemination, solicitation, or circulation of visual, oral, or written communication to directly induce any person to patronize a particular medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business or purchase particular regulated marijuana. "Advertising" does not include packaging and labeling, consumer education materials, or branding.
- "Affiliate" of, or person "affiliated with", has the same meaning as defined in 17 CFR 230.405.
- "Beneficial owner of", "beneficial ownership of", or "beneficially owns an" owner's interest is determined in accordance with 17 CFR 240.13d-3.
- "Branding" means promotion of a business's brand through publicizing the medical marijuana business's or retail marijuana business's name, logo, or distinct design features of the brand.
- "Consumer education materials" means any informational materials that seek to educate consumers about regulated marijuana generally, including but not limited to education regarding the safe consumption of marijuana, regulated marijuana concentrate, or regulated marijuana products, provided they are not distributed or made available to individuals under twenty-one years of age.
- "Control", "controls", "controlled", "controlling", "controlled by", and "under common control with", means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting owner's interests, by contract, or otherwise.
-
"Controlling beneficial owner" is limited to a person that satisfies one or more of the following criteria:
-
A natural person, an entity as defined in section 7-90-102 (20) that is organized under the laws of and for which its principal place of business is located in one of the states or territories of the United States or District of Columbia, a publicly traded corporation, or a qualified private fund that is not a qualified institutional investor:
- Acting alone or acting in concert, that owns or acquires beneficial ownership of ten percent or more of the owner's interest of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business;
- That is an affiliate that controls a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business and includes, without limitation, any manager; or
- That is otherwise in a position to control the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business except as authorized in section 44-10-506 or 44-10-606; or
- A qualified institutional investor acting alone or acting in concert that owns or acquires beneficial ownership of more than thirty percent of the owner's interest of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business.
-
A natural person, an entity as defined in section 7-90-102 (20) that is organized under the laws of and for which its principal place of business is located in one of the states or territories of the United States or District of Columbia, a publicly traded corporation, or a qualified private fund that is not a qualified institutional investor:
- "Escorted" means appropriately checked into a limited access area and accompanied by a person licensed by the state licensing authority; except that trade craftspeople not normally engaged in the business of cultivating, processing, selling, or testing regulated marijuana need not be accompanied on a full-time basis, but only reasonably monitored.
- "Executive director" means the executive director of the department of revenue.
- "Fibrous waste" means any roots, stalks, and stems from a medical or retail marijuana plant.
-
"Good cause", for purposes of refusing or denying a license renewal, reinstatement, or initial license issuance, means:
- The licensee or applicant has violated, does not meet, or has failed to comply with any of the terms, conditions, or provisions of this article 10; any rules promulgated pursuant to this article 10; or any supplemental local law, rules, or regulations;
- The licensee or applicant has failed to comply with any special terms or conditions that were placed on its license pursuant to an order of the state or local licensing authority;
- The licensed premises have been operated in a manner that adversely affects the public health or welfare or the safety of the immediate neighborhood in which the establishment is located.
- "Immature plant" means a nonflowering marijuana plant that is no taller than eight inches and no wider than eight inches; is produced from a cutting, clipping, or seedling; and is in a cultivating container.
-
"Indirect financial interest holder" means a person that is not an affiliate, a controlling beneficial owner, or a passive beneficial owner of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business and that:
- Holds a commercially reasonable royalty interest in exchange for a medical marijuana business's or retail marijuana business's use of the person's intellectual property;
- Holds a permitted economic interest that was issued prior to January 1, 2020, and that has not been converted into an owner's interest;
- Is a contract counterparty with a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business, other than a customary employment agreement, that has a direct nexus to the cultivation, manufacture, or sale of regulated marijuana, including, but not limited to, a lease of real property on which the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business operates, a lease of equipment used in the cultivation of regulated marijuana, a secured or unsecured financing agreement with the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business, a security contract with the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business, or a management agreement with the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business, provided that no such contract compensates the contract counterparty with a percentage of revenue for profits of the medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business; or
- Is identified by rule by the state licensing authority as an indirect financial interest holder.
- "Industrial fiber products" means intermediate or finished products made from fibrous waste that are not intended for human or animal consumption and are not usable or recognizable as medical or retail marijuana. Industrial fiber products include but are not limited to cordage, paper, fuel, textiles, bedding, insulation, construction materials, compost materials, and industrial materials.
- "Industrial hemp" means a plant of the genus cannabis and any part of the plant, whether growing or not, containing a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of no more than three-tenths of one percent on a dry weight basis.
-
"Industrial hemp product" means a finished product containing industrial hemp that:
- Is a cosmetic, food, food additive, or herb;
- Is for human use or consumption;
- Contains any part of the hemp plant, including naturally occurring cannabinoids, compounds, concentrates, extracts, isolates, resins, or derivatives; and
- Contains a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of no more than three-tenths of one percent on a dry weight basis.
- "License" means to grant a license, permit, or registration pursuant to this article 10.
- "Licensed premises" means the premises specified in an application for a license under this article 10 that are owned or in possession of the licensee and within which the licensee is authorized to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell, or test regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products in accordance with this article 10.
- "Licensee" means a person licensed or registered pursuant to this article 10.
- "Limited access areas", subject to the provisions of section 44-10-1001, means a building, room, or other contiguous area upon the licensed premises where regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products are cultivated, manufactured, stored, weighed, packaged, sold, possessed for sale, or tested, under control of the licensee, with access limited to only those persons licensed by the state licensing authority and those visitors escorted by a person licensed by the state licensing authority. All areas of ingress or egress to limited access areas must be clearly identified as such by a sign as designated by the state licensing authority.
- "Local jurisdiction" means a locality as defined in section 16 (2)(e) of article XVIII of the state constitution.
- "Local licensing authority" means an authority designated by municipal, county, or city and county charter, ordinance, or resolution, or the governing body of a municipality or city and county, or the board of county commissioners of a county if no such authority is designated.
- "Location" means a particular parcel of land that may be identified by an address or other descriptive means.
- "Manager" has the same meaning as in section 7-90-102 (35.7).
- "Marijuana accessories" has the same meaning as defined in section 16 (2)(g) of article XVIII of the state constitution.
- "Marijuana-based workforce development or training program" means a program designed to train individuals to work in the regulated marijuana industry operated by an entity licensed under this article 10 or by a school that is authorized by the private occupational school division.
-
"Marijuana consumer waste" means any component left after the consumption of a regulated marijuana product, including but not limited to containers, packages, cartridges, pods, cups, batteries, all-in-one disposable devices, and any other waste component left after the regulated marijuana is consumed as defined by rules promulgated by the state licensing authority.
(33.5) "Marijuana hospitality business" means a facility, which may be mobile, licensed to permit the consumption of marijuana pursuant to this article 10; rules promulgated pursuant to this article 10; and the provisions of an enacted, initiated, or referred ordinance or resolution of the local jurisdiction in which the licensee operates.
- "Medical marijuana" means marijuana that is grown and sold pursuant to the provisions of this article 10 and for a purpose authorized by section 14 of article XVIII of the state constitution but shall not be considered a nonprescription drug for purposes of section 12-280-103 (28) or 39-26-717, or an over-the-counter medication for purposes of section 25.5-5-322. If the context requires, medical marijuana includes medical marijuana concentrate and medical marijuana products.
- "Medical marijuana business" means any of the following entities licensed pursuant to this article 10: A medical marijuana store, a medical marijuana cultivation facility, a medical marijuana products manufacturer, a medical marijuana testing facility, a marijuana research and development licensee, a medical marijuana business operator, or a medical marijuana transporter.
-
"Medical marijuana business operator" means an entity or person that is not an owner and that is licensed to provide professional operational services to a medical marijuana business for direct remuneration from the medical marijuana business. A medical marijuana business operator is not, by virtue of its status as a medical marijuana business operator, a controlling beneficial owner or a passive beneficial owner of any medical marijuana business it operates.
(36.5) "Medical marijuana concentrate" means a subset of medical marijuana that is separated from the medical marijuana plant and results in matter with a higher concentration of cannabinoids than naturally occur in the plant. Medical marijuana concentrate contains cannabinoids and may contain terpenes and other chemicals that are naturally occurring in medical marijuana plants that have been separated from medical marijuana. Medical marijuana concentrate may also include residual amounts of the types of solvents, as permitted by the marijuana rules. The state licensing authority may further define by rule subcategories of medical marijuana concentrate and authorize limited ingredients based on the method of production of medical marijuana concentrate. Unless the context otherwise requires, medical marijuana concentrate is included when this article 10 refers to medical marijuana product.
- "Medical marijuana cultivation facility" means a person licensed pursuant to this article 10 to operate a business as described in section 44-10-502.
- "Medical marijuana product" means a product infused with medical marijuana that is intended for use or consumption other than by smoking, including but not limited to edible products, ointments, and tinctures.
- "Medical marijuana products manufacturer" means a person licensed pursuant to this article 10 to operate a business as described in section 44-10-503.
- "Medical marijuana store" means a person licensed pursuant to this article 10 to operate a business as described in section 44-10-501 that sells medical marijuana to registered patients or primary caregivers as defined in section 14 of article XVIII of the state constitution, but is not a primary caregiver.
- "Medical marijuana transporter" means an entity or person licensed to transport medical marijuana and medical marijuana products from one medical marijuana business to another medical marijuana business and to temporarily store the transported medical marijuana and medical marijuana products at its licensed premises, but not authorized to sell medical marijuana or medical marijuana products under any circumstances.
- "Mobile distribution center" means any vehicle other than a common passenger light-duty vehicle with a short wheel base used to carry a quantity of marijuana greater than one ounce.
- "Opaque" means that the packaging does not allow the product to be seen without opening the packaging material.
- "Operating fees", as referred to in section 16 (5)(f) of article XVIII of the state constitution, means fees that may be charged by a local jurisdiction for costs, including but not limited to inspection, administration, and enforcement of retail marijuana businesses authorized pursuant to this article 10.
- "Owner's interest" has the same meaning as in section 7-90-102 (44) and is synonymous with the term "security" unless the context otherwise requires.
- "Passive beneficial owner" means any person acquiring any owner's interest in a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business that is not otherwise a controlling beneficial owner or in control.
- "Permitted economic interest" means any unsecured convertible debt instrument, option agreement, warrant, or any other right to obtain an ownership interest when the holder of such interest is a natural person who is a lawful United States resident and whose right to convert into an ownership interest is contingent on the holder qualifying and obtaining a license as an owner under this article 10, or such other agreements as may be permitted by rule of the state licensing authority.
- "Person" has the same meaning as defined in section 7-90-102 (49).
- "Premises" means a distinctly identified, as required by the state licensing authority, and definite location, which may include a building, a part of a building, a room, or any other definite contiguous area.
-
"Publicly traded corporation" means any person other than an individual that is organized under the laws of and for which its principal place of business is located in one of the states or territories of the United States or District of Columbia or another country that authorizes the sale of marijuana and that:
-
Has a class of securities registered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 77a et seq., that:
- Constitutes "covered securities" pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 77r (b)(1)(A); or
-
Is qualified and quoted on the OTCQX or OTCQB tier of the OTC markets if:
- The person is then required to file reports and is filing reports on a current basis with the federal securities and exchange commission pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 78a et seq., as if the securities constituted "covered securities" as described in subsection (50)(a)(I) of this section; and
- The person has established and is in compliance with corporate governance measures pursuant to corporate governance obligations imposed on securities qualified and quoted on the OTCQX tier of the OTC markets.
-
Is an entity that has a class of securities listed on the Canadian securities exchange, Toronto stock exchange, TSX venture exchange, or other equity securities exchange recognized by the state licensing authority, if:
- The entity constitutes a "foreign private issuer", as defined in 17 CFR 230.405, whose securities are exempt from registration pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 78a et seq., pursuant to 17 CFR 240.12g3-2; and
- The entity has been, for the preceding three hundred sixty-five days or since the formation of the entity, in compliance with all governance and reporting obligations imposed by the relevant exchange on such entity;
- Is reasonably identified as a publicly traded corporation by rule; or
-
A "publicly traded corporation" described in subsection (50)(a), (50)(b), or (50)(c) of this section does not include:
-
An "ineligible issuer", as defined in 17 CFR 230.405, unless such publicly traded corporation satisfies the definition of ineligible issuer solely because it is one or more of the following, and the person is filing reports on a current basis with the federal securities and exchange commission pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 78a et seq., as if the securities constituted "covered securities" as described in subsection (50)(a)(I) of this section, and prior to becoming a publicly traded corporation, the person for at least two years was licensed by the state licensing authority as a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business with a demonstrated history of operations in the state of Colorado, and during such time was not subject to suspension or revocation of the license:
- A "blank check company", as defined in 17 CFR 230.419 (a)(2);
- An issuer in an offering of "penny stock", as defined in 17 CFR 240.3a51-1; or
- A "shell company", as defined in 17 CFR 240.12b-2; and
- A person disqualified as a "bad actor" pursuant to 17 CFR 230.506 (d)(1).
-
An "ineligible issuer", as defined in 17 CFR 230.405, unless such publicly traded corporation satisfies the definition of ineligible issuer solely because it is one or more of the following, and the person is filing reports on a current basis with the federal securities and exchange commission pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 78a et seq., as if the securities constituted "covered securities" as described in subsection (50)(a)(I) of this section, and prior to becoming a publicly traded corporation, the person for at least two years was licensed by the state licensing authority as a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business with a demonstrated history of operations in the state of Colorado, and during such time was not subject to suspension or revocation of the license:
-
Has a class of securities registered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 77a et seq., that:
-
"Qualified institutional investor" means:
- A bank, as defined in 15 U.S.C. sec. 78c (a)(6), if the bank is current in all applicable reporting and record-keeping requirements under such act and rules promulgated thereunder;
- A bank holding company, as defined in 12 U.S.C. sec. 1841 (a)(1), if the bank holding company is registered and current in all applicable reporting and record-keeping requirements under such act and rules promulgated thereunder;
- An insurance company, as defined in 15 U.S.C. sec. 80a-2 (a)(17), if the insurance company is current in all applicable reporting and record-keeping requirements under such act and rules promulgated thereunder;
- An investment company registered and subject to 15 U.S.C. sec. 80a-1 et seq., if the investment company is current in all applicable reporting and record-keeping requirements under such act and rules promulgated thereunder;
- An employee benefit plan or pension fund subject to 29 U.S.C. sec. 1001 et seq., excluding an employee benefit plan or pension fund sponsored by a licensee or an intermediary holding company licensee that directly or indirectly owns ten percent or more of a licensee;
- A state or federal government pension plan;
- A group comprised entirely of persons specified in subsections (51)(a) to (51)(f) of this section; or
- Any other entity identified by rule by the state licensing authority.
-
"Qualified private fund" means an issuer that would be an investment company, as defined in, but for the exclusions provided under, 15 U.S.C. sec. 80a-3, and that:
- Is advised or managed by an investment adviser, as defined and registered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. sec. 80b-1 et seq., and for which the registered investment adviser is current in all applicable reporting and record-keeping requirements under such act and rules promulgated thereunder; and
-
Satisfies one or more of the following:
- Is organized under the law of a state or the United States;
- Is organized, operated, or sponsored by a "U.S. person", as defined under 17 CFR 230.902(k), as amended; or
- Sells securities to a "U.S. person", as defined under 17 CFR 230.902(k), as amended.
- "Reasonable cause" means just or legitimate grounds based in law and in fact to believe that the particular requested action furthers the purposes of this article 10 or protects public safety.
- "Regulated marijuana" means medical marijuana and retail marijuana. If the context requires, regulated marijuana includes medical marijuana concentrate, medical marijuana products, retail marijuana concentrate, and retail marijuana products.
- "Regulated marijuana products" means medical marijuana products and retail marijuana products.
- "Resealable" means that the package continues to function within effectiveness specifications, which shall be established by the state licensing authority similar to the federal "Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970", 15 U.S.C. sec. 1471 et seq., for the number of openings and closings customary for its size and contents, which shall be determined by the state licensing authority.
- "Retail marijuana" means "marijuana" or "marihuana", as defined in section 16 (2)(f) of article XVIII of the state constitution, that is cultivated, manufactured, distributed, or sold by a licensed retail marijuana business. If the context requires, retail marijuana includes retail marijuana concentrate and retail marijuana products.
- "Retail marijuana business" means a retail marijuana store, a retail marijuana cultivation facility, a retail marijuana products manufacturer, a marijuana hospitality business, a retail marijuana hospitality and sales business, a retail marijuana testing facility, a retail marijuana business operator, or a retail marijuana transporter licensed pursuant to this article 10.
-
"Retail marijuana business operator" means an entity or person that is not an owner and that is licensed to provide professional operational services to a retail marijuana business for direct remuneration from the retail marijuana business.
(59.5) "Retail marijuana concentrate" means a subset of retail marijuana that is separated from the retail marijuana plant and results in matter with a higher concentration of cannabinoids than naturally occur in the plant. Retail marijuana concentrate contains cannabinoids and may contain terpenes and other chemicals that are naturally occurring in retail marijuana plants that have been separated from retail marijuana. Retail marijuana concentrate may also include residual amounts of the types of solvents, as permitted by the marijuana rules. The state licensing authority may further define by rule subcategories of retail marijuana concentrate and authorize limited ingredients based on the method of production of retail marijuana concentrate. Unless the context otherwise requires, retail marijuana concentrate is included when this article 10 refers to retail marijuana product.
-
"Retail marijuana cultivation facility" has the same meaning as "marijuana cultivation facility" as defined in section 16 (2)(h) of article XVIII of the state constitution.
(60.5) "Retail marijuana hospitality and sales business" means a facility, which cannot be mobile, licensed to permit the consumption of only the retail marijuana or retail marijuana products it has sold pursuant to the provisions of an enacted, initiated, or referred ordinance or resolution of the local jurisdiction in which the licensee operates.
- "Retail marijuana products" means "marijuana products" as defined in section 16 (2)(k) of article XVIII of the state constitution that are produced at a retail marijuana products manufacturer.
- "Retail marijuana products manufacturer" has the same meaning as "marijuana product manufacturing facility" as defined in section 16 (2)(j) of article XVIII of the state constitution.
- "Retail marijuana store" has the same meaning as defined in section 16 (2)(n) of article XVIII of the state constitution.
- "Retail marijuana testing facility" means "marijuana testing facility" as defined in section 16 (2)(l) of article XVIII of the state constitution that is licensed pursuant to this article 10.
- "Retail marijuana transporter" means an entity or person licensed to transport retail marijuana and retail marijuana products from one retail marijuana business to another retail marijuana business and to temporarily store the transported retail marijuana and retail marijuana products at its licensed premises, but not authorized to sell retail marijuana or retail marijuana products under any circumstances.
- "Sale" or "sell" includes to exchange, barter, or traffic in; to solicit or receive and order except through a licensee licensed under this article 10; to deliver for value in any way other than gratuitously; to peddle or possess with intent to sell; or to traffic in for any consideration promised or obtained directly or indirectly.
- "School" means a public or private preschool or a public or private elementary, middle, junior high, or high school or institution of higher education.
-
"Security" has the same meaning as defined in 15 U.S.C. sec. 77b (a)(1) et seq.
(68.5) "Social equity licensee" means a natural person who meets the criteria established pursuant to section 44-10-308 (4). A person qualified as a social equity licensee may participate in the accelerator program established pursuant to this article 10 or may hold a regulated marijuana business license or permit issued pursuant to this article 10.
- "State licensing authority" means the authority created for the purpose of regulating and controlling the licensing of the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale, and testing of regulated marijuana in this state pursuant to section 44-10-201.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2825, § 5, effective January 1, 2020; (33.5) and (60.5) added and (58) amended, (HB 19-1230), ch. 340, p. 3117, § 12, effective January 1, 2020. L. 2020: (1), (2), and (4) amended, (3) repealed, and (4.5) and (68.5) added, (HB 20-1424), ch. 184, p. 842, § 1, effective September 14. L. 2021: (36.5) and (59.5) added, (HB 21-1317), ch. 313, p. 1915, § 6, effective June 24; (6.5) added, (HB 21-1301), ch. 304, p. 1825, § 3, effective September 7; (8), (9), (41), IP(50)(a), (50)(a)(I), (50)(a)(II)(A), (50)(b)(I), (50)(d), (51), IP(52), (52)(a), (65), and (68) amended, (HB 21-1178), ch. 130, p. 521, § 1, effective September 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former §§ 44-11-104 and 44-12-103 as they existed prior to 2020.
- Subsection (34) of this section was numbered as § 44-11-104 (11) in HB 19-1172. That provision was harmonized with and relocated to this section as this section appears in SB 19-224.
44-10-104. Applicability - medical marijuana - retail marijuana.
-
- A county, city and county, or municipality may adopt and enforce a resolution or ordinance licensing, regulating, or prohibiting the cultivation or sale of medical marijuana. In a county, city and county, or municipality where such an ordinance or resolution has been adopted, a person who is not registered as a patient or primary caregiver pursuant to section 25-1.5-106 and who is cultivating or selling medical marijuana is not entitled to an affirmative defense to a criminal prosecution as provided for in section 14 of article XVIII of the state constitution unless the person is in compliance with the applicable county or municipal law.
- The operation of this article 10 as it relates to medical marijuana shall be statewide unless a municipality, county, city, or city and county, by either a majority of the registered electors of the municipality, county, city, or city and county voting at a regular election or special election called in accordance with the "Colorado Municipal Election Code of 1965", article 10 of title 31, or the "Uniform Election Code of 1992", articles 1 to 13 of title 1, as applicable, or a majority of the members of the governing board for the municipality, county, city, or city and county, vote to prohibit the operation of medical marijuana stores, medical marijuana cultivation facilities, and medical marijuana products manufacturers' licenses.
- All businesses for the purpose of cultivation, manufacture, or sale of medical marijuana or medical marijuana products, as defined in this article 10, are subject to the terms and conditions of this article 10 and any rules promulgated pursuant to this article 10.
-
- A person applying for licensure pursuant to this article 10 must complete forms as provided by the state licensing authority and must pay the application fee and the licensing fee, which must be credited to the marijuana cash fund established pursuant to section 44-10-801. The state licensing authority shall forward, within seven days, one-half of the retail marijuana business license application fee to the local jurisdiction unless the application is for an accelerator cultivator, accelerator manufacturer, or accelerator store license or unless the local jurisdiction has prohibited the operation of retail marijuana businesses pursuant to section 16 (5)(f) of article XVIII of the state constitution. If the license is denied, the state licensing authority shall refund the licensing fee to the applicant.
- The state licensing authority shall act upon a retail marijuana business license application made pursuant to subsection (1)(a) of this section no sooner than forty-five days and no later than ninety days after the date of the retail marijuana business license application. The state licensing authority shall process retail marijuana business license applications in the order in which complete applications are received by the state licensing authority.
- As provided in section 16 (5)(f) of article XVIII of the state constitution, any local jurisdiction may enact ordinances or regulations governing the time, place, manner, and number of retail marijuana businesses, which may include a local licensing requirement, or may prohibit the operation of retail marijuana businesses through the enactment of an ordinance or through a referred or initiated measure. If a county acts through an initiated measure, the proponents shall submit a petition signed by not less than fifteen percent of the registered electors in the county.
- This article 10 sets forth the exclusive means by which cultivation, manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensing, and testing of regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products may occur in the state of Colorado.
-
- Nothing in this article 10 is intended to require an employer to permit or accommodate the use, consumption, possession, transfer, display, transportation, sale, or cultivating of regulated marijuana in the workplace or to affect the ability of employers to have policies restricting the use of marijuana by employees.
- Nothing in this article 10 prohibits a person, employer, school, hospital, detention facility, corporation, or any other entity that occupies, owns, or controls a property from prohibiting or otherwise regulating the possession, consumption, use, display, transfer, distribution, sale, transportation, or cultivating of regulated marijuana on or in that property.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection (5), holding or exercising the privileges of any license issued pursuant to this article 10 shall not constitute an unsuitable or unlawful act or practice within the meaning of the statutes and rules governing the Colorado limited gaming control commission.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2835, § 5, effective January 1, 2020. L. 2020: (2)(a) amended, (HB 20-1424), ch. 184, p. 843, § 2, effective September 14.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former §§ 44-11-103, 44-11-106, and 44-12-104 as they existed prior to 2020.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For article, " C ommercial Leases Involving C annabis Businesses--A Practical Guide for Landlords and Their Counsel", see 50 Colo. Law. 42 (Mar. 2021).
Debtors licensed to grow and dispense medical marijuana cannot obtain bankruptcy relief. While debtors have not engaged in intrinsically evil conduct, they cannot obtain bankruptcy relief because their marijuana business activities are federal crimes. In re Arenas, 535 B.R. 845 (10th Cir. 2015) (decided under former § 12-43.3-103).
44-10-105. Marijuana employee designation.
An employee of a licensee is not an agricultural worker unless the employee is a laborer at a farm, plantation, ranch, nursery, range, greenhouse, orchard, or other structure used for the raising of agricultural or horticultural commodities, as long as the structure is utilized for at least fifty percent of the total output produced.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2839, § 5, effective January 1, 2020. L. 2021: Entire section amended, (SB 21-087), ch. 337, p. 2186, § 13, effective June 25.
44-10-106. Marijuana employee labor rights.
If the national labor relations board or a court rules that marijuana or marijuana-related businesses are not covered by the federal "National Labor Relations Act", 29 U.S.C. sec. 151 et seq., then a marijuana business or marijuana-related business and its employees doing business in Colorado are covered by the "Labor Peace Act", part 1 of article 3 of title 8, to the same extent that a business would be covered by the federal "National Labor Relations Act", 29 U.S.C. sec. 151 et seq., absent such a ruling.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2839, § 5, effective January 1, 2020.
PART 2 STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY
44-10-201. State licensing authority - creation.
-
- For the purpose of regulating and controlling the licensing of the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale, and testing of regulated marijuana in this state, there is hereby created the state licensing authority, which is the executive director or the deputy director of the department if the executive director so designates.
- The state licensing authority also has regulatory authority for retail marijuana and retail marijuana products as permitted in section 16 of article XVIII of the state constitution and this article 10.
- The executive director is the chief administrative officer of the state licensing authority and may employ, pursuant to section 13 of article XII of the state constitution, such officers and employees as may be determined to be necessary, which officers and employees are part of the department.
- A state licensing authority employee with regulatory oversight responsibilities for marijuana businesses licensed by the state licensing authority shall not work for, represent, or provide consulting services to or otherwise derive pecuniary gain from a medical or retail marijuana business licensed by the state licensing authority or other business entity established for the primary purpose of providing services to the marijuana industry for a period of six months following his or her last day of employment with the state licensing authority.
- Any person who discloses confidential records or information in violation of the provisions of this article 10 commits a class 2 misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-501. Any criminal prosecution pursuant to the provisions of this section must be brought within five years from the date the violation occurred.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2840, § 5, effective January 1, 2020. L. 2021: (4) amended, (SB 21-271), ch. 462, p. 3327, § 785, effective March 1, 2022.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former §§ 44-11-201 and 44-12-201 as they existed prior to 2020.
44-10-202. Powers and duties of state licensing authority - stakeholder work group - rules - report - legislative declaration.
-
Powers and duties. The state licensing authority shall:
-
Develop and maintain a seed-to-sale tracking system that tracks regulated marijuana from either the seed or immature plant stage until the regulated marijuana or regulated marijuana product is sold to a patient at a medical marijuana store or to a customer at a retail marijuana store or a retail marijuana hospitality and sales business to ensure that no regulated marijuana grown or processed by a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business is sold or otherwise transferred except by a medical or retail marijuana store or a retail marijuana hospitality and sales business; except that the medical marijuana or medical marijuana product is no longer subject to the tracking system once the medical marijuana or medical marijuana product has been:
- Repealed.
-
Transferred to a pesticide manufacturer in quantities that are limited as specified in rules promulgated by the state licensing authority, in consultation with the departments of public health and environment and agriculture. The rules must define a pesticide manufacturer that is authorized to conduct research and must authorize a pesticide manufacturer to conduct research to establish safe and effective protocols for the use of pesticides on medical marijuana. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a pesticide manufacturer authorized pursuant to this subsection (1)(a)(II) to conduct pesticide research regarding marijuana must be located in Colorado, must conduct the research in Colorado, and is exempt from all otherwise applicable restrictions on the possession and use of medical marijuana or medical marijuana products; except that the manufacturer shall:
- Not possess at any time a quantity of medical marijuana or medical marijuana product in excess of the limit established in rules promulgated by the state licensing authority;
- Use the medical marijuana and medical marijuana product only for the pesticide research authorized pursuant to this subsection (1)(a)(II);
- Destroy, in compliance with rules promulgated by the state licensing authority, all medical marijuana and medical marijuana products remaining after the research has been completed; and
- Not apply pesticides for research purposes on the licensed premises of a medical marijuana business.
- Grant or refuse state licenses for the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale, hospitality, and testing of regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products as provided by law; suspend, fine, restrict, or revoke such licenses, whether active, expired, or surrendered, upon a violation of this article 10 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 10; and impose any penalty authorized by this article 10 or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 10. The state licensing authority may take any action with respect to a registration or permit pursuant to this article 10 as it may with respect to a license pursuant to this article 10, in accordance with the procedures established pursuant to this article 10.
- Promulgate rules for the proper regulation and control of the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale, and testing of regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products and for the enforcement of this article 10 and promulgate amended rules and such special rulings and findings as necessary;
- Hear and determine at a public hearing any contested state license denial and any complaints against a licensee and administer oaths and issue subpoenas to require the presence of persons and the production of papers, books, and records necessary to the determination of any hearing so held, all in accordance with article 4 of title 24. The state licensing authority may, at its discretion, delegate to the department hearing officers the authority to conduct licensing, disciplinary, and rule-making hearings pursuant to section 24-4-105. When conducting the hearings, the hearing officers are employees of the state licensing authority under the direction and supervision of the executive director and the state licensing authority.
- Develop such forms, licenses, identification cards, and applications as are necessary or convenient in the discretion of the state licensing authority for the administration of this article 10 or rules promulgated pursuant to this article 10;
- Prepare and transmit annually, in the form and manner prescribed by the heads of the principal departments pursuant to section 24-1-136, a report accounting to the governor for the efficient discharge of all responsibilities assigned by law or directive to the state licensing authority; and
- Collect and maintain data related to licensing disqualifications and all sanctions based on past criminal history pursuant to the requirements in section 24-34-104 (6)(b)(IX).
- Repealed.
-
Develop and maintain a seed-to-sale tracking system that tracks regulated marijuana from either the seed or immature plant stage until the regulated marijuana or regulated marijuana product is sold to a patient at a medical marijuana store or to a customer at a retail marijuana store or a retail marijuana hospitality and sales business to ensure that no regulated marijuana grown or processed by a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business is sold or otherwise transferred except by a medical or retail marijuana store or a retail marijuana hospitality and sales business; except that the medical marijuana or medical marijuana product is no longer subject to the tracking system once the medical marijuana or medical marijuana product has been:
- Nothing in this article 10 delegates to the state licensing authority the power to fix prices for regulated marijuana.
- Nothing in this article 10 limits a law enforcement agency's ability to investigate unlawful activity in relation to a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business. A law enforcement agency has the authority to run a Colorado crime information center criminal history record check of a primary caregiver, licensee, or employee of a licensee during an investigation of unlawful activity related to medical marijuana. A law enforcement agency has the authority to run a Colorado crime information center criminal history record check of a licensee or employee of a licensee during an investigation of unlawful activity related to regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products.
- The executive director of the department of public health and environment shall provide to the state licensing authority standards for licensing laboratories pursuant to the requirements as outlined in section 44-10-203 (2)(d)(II) for regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products.
-
- The state licensing authority has the authority to petition a district court for an investigative subpoena applicable to a person who is not licensed pursuant to this article 10 to obtain documents or information necessary to enforce the provisions of this article 10 and any rules promulgated pursuant to this article 10 after reasonable efforts have been made to obtain requested documents or information without a subpoena.
-
The state licensing authority may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction to temporarily restrain or preliminarily or permanently enjoin the act in question of a person who is not licensed pursuant to this article 10 and to enforce compliance with this article 10 or any rule or order issued pursuant to this article 10 whenever it appears to the state licensing authority upon sufficient evidence satisfactory to the state licensing authority that any person has been or is committing an act prohibited by this article 10, a rule promulgated pursuant to this article 10, a rule or an order issued pursuant to this article 10, and the act:
- Threatens public health or safety;
- Constitutes an unlawful act for which the person does not hold the required license under this article 10; or
- Constitutes a violation of an order of the state licensing authority.
- The general assembly finds and declares that matters related to labeling as regulated pursuant to this section and section 44-10-203 (2)(f), packaging as regulated pursuant to this section and section 44-10-203 (3)(b), and testing as regulated pursuant to this section and section 44-10-203 (2)(d) are matters of statewide concern and the sole regulatory authority for labeling, packaging, and testing is section 44-10-203.
- and (8) Repealed.
Source: L. 2019: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2840, § 5, effective January 1, 2020; IP(1)(a) and (1)(b) amended, (HB 19-1230), ch. 340, p. 3118, § 13, effective January 1, 2020. L. 2020: (1)(a)(I) repealed, (HB 20-1402), ch. 216, p. 1060, § 74, effective June 30. L. 2021: (8) added, (HB 21-1317), ch. 313, p. 1920, § 10, effective June 24; (1)(b) amended, (HB 21-1178), ch. 130, p. 524, § 2, effective September 7; (1)(f) and (1)(g) amended and (1)(h) added, (HB 21-1301), ch. 304, p. 1825, § 4, effective September 7.
Editor's note:
- This section is similar to former §§ 44-12-202 IP(2), (2)(a), (2)(b), and (3)(a)(IV)(G) and 44-11-202 (1)(c), (1)(e), and (1)(f) as they existed prior to 2020.
- Subsection (7)(b) provided for the repeal of subsection (7), effective July 1, 2021. (See L. 2019, p. 2840.)
- Subsection (8)(c) provided for the repeal of subsection (8), effective July 1, 2022. (See L. 2021, p. 1920.)
- Subsection (1)(h)(II) provided for the repeal of subsection (1)(h), effective September 1, 2022. (See L. 2021, p. 1825.)
ANNOTATION
Applied in Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States, 955 F.3d 1146 (10th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 594 U.S. __, 141 S. Ct. 2236, 210 L. Ed. 2d 974 (2021).
44-10-203. State licensing authority - rules.
-
Permissive rule-making. Rules promulgated pursuant to section 44-10-202 (1)(c) may include but need not be limited to the following subjects:
- Labeling guidelines concerning the total content of THC per unit of weight;
- Control of informational and product displays on licensed premises;
- Records to be kept by licensees and the required availability of the records;
- Permitted economic interests issued prior to January 1, 2020, including a process for a criminal history record check, a requirement that a permitted economic interest applicant submit to and pass a criminal history record check, a divestiture, and other agreements that would qualify as permitted economic interests;
- Specifications of duties of officers and employees of the state licensing authority;
- Instructions for local licensing authorities and law enforcement officers;
- Requirements for inspections, investigations, searches, seizures, forfeitures, and such additional activities as may become necessary from time to time;
- Prohibition of misrepresentation and unfair practices;
- Marijuana research and development licenses, including application requirements; renewal requirements, including whether additional research projects may be added or considered; conditions for license revocation; security measures to ensure marijuana is not diverted to purposes other than research or diverted outside of the regulated marijuana market; the amount of plants, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, or marijuana products a licensee may have on its premises; licensee reporting requirements; the conditions under which marijuana possessed by medical marijuana licensees may be donated to marijuana research and development licensees or transferred to a nonmetric-based research facility; provisions to prevent contamination; requirements for destruction or transfer of marijuana after the research is concluded; and any additional requirements;
- A definition for "disproportionate impacted area" to the extent relevant state of Colorado data exists, is available, and is used for the purpose of determining eligibility for a social equity licensee;
- The implementation of contingency plans pursuant to sections 44-10-502 (10) and 44-10-602 (14), including the definition of outdoor cultivation, adverse weather event, or adverse natural occurrence and the process, procedures, requirements, and restrictions for contingency plans; and
- Such other matters as are necessary for the fair, impartial, stringent, and comprehensive administration of this article 10.
-
Mandatory rule-making. Rules promulgated pursuant to section 44-10-202 (1)(c) must include but need not be limited to the following subjects:
- Procedures consistent with this article 10 for the issuance, renewal, suspension, and revocation of licenses to operate medical marijuana businesses and retail marijuana businesses;
- Subject to the limitations contained in section 16 (5)(a)(II) of article XVIII of the state constitution and consistent with this article 10, a schedule of application, licensing, and renewal fees for medical marijuana businesses and retail marijuana businesses;
- Qualifications for licensure pursuant to this article 10, including but not limited to the requirement for a fingerprint-based criminal history record check for all controlling beneficial owners, passive beneficial owners, managers, contractors, employees, and other support staff of entities licensed pursuant to this article 10;
-
- Establishment of a marijuana and marijuana products independent testing and certification program for marijuana business licensees, within an implementation time frame established by the department, requiring licensees to test marijuana and industrial hemp products to ensure, at a minimum, that products sold for human consumption by persons licensed pursuant to this article 10 do not contain contaminants that are injurious to health and to ensure correct labeling.
- Testing may include analysis for microbial and residual solvents and chemical and biological contaminants deemed to be public health hazards by the Colorado department of public health and environment based on medical reports and published scientific literature.
-
- If test results indicate the presence of quantities of any substance determined to be injurious to health, the medical marijuana or retail marijuana licensee shall immediately quarantine the products and notify the state licensing authority. The state licensing authority shall give the licensee an opportunity to remediate the product if the test indicated the presence of a microbial. If the licensee is unable to remediate the product, the licensee shall document and properly destroy the adulterated product.
- If retail marijuana or retail marijuana product test results indicate the presence of quantities of any substance determined to be injurious to health, the state licensing authority shall give the licensee an opportunity to retest the retail marijuana or retail marijuana product.
- If two additional tests of the retail marijuana or retail marijuana product do not indicate the presence of quantities of any substance determined to be injurious to health, the product may be used or sold by the retail marijuana licensee.
-
- Testing must also verify THC potency representations and homogeneity for correct labeling and provide a cannabinoid profile for the regulated marijuana product.
- An individual retail marijuana piece of ten milligrams or less that has gone through process validation is exempt from continued homogeneity testing.
- Homogeneity testing for one hundred milligram servings of retail marijuana may utilize validation measures.
- The state licensing authority shall determine an acceptable variance for potency representations and procedures to address potency misrepresentations. The state licensing authority shall determine an acceptable variance of at least plus or minus fifteen percent for potency representations and procedures to address potency misrepresentations.
- The state licensing authority shall determine the protocols and frequency of regulated marijuana testing by licensees.
- A state, local, or municipal agency shall not employ or use the results of any test of regulated marijuana or regulated marijuana products conducted by an analytical laboratory that is not certified pursuant to this subsection (2)(d)(VII) for the particular testing category or that is not accredited to the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission 17025:2005 standard, or any subsequent superseding standard, in that field of testing. Starting January 1, 2018, a state, local, or municipal agency may use or employ the results of any test of regulated marijuana or regulated marijuana products conducted on or after January 1, 2018, by an analytical laboratory that is certified pursuant to this subsection (2)(d)(VII) for the particular testing category or is accredited pursuant to the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission 17025:2005 standard, or any subsequent superseding standard, in that field of testing.
- On or before January 1, 2019, the state licensing authority shall require a medical marijuana testing facility or retail marijuana testing facility to be accredited by a body that is itself recognized by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation in a category of testing pursuant to the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission 17025:2005 standard, or a subsequent superseding standard, in order to receive certification or maintain certification; except that the state licensing authority may by rule establish conditions for providing extensions to a newly licensed medical marijuana testing facility or retail marijuana testing facility for a period not to exceed twelve months or a medical marijuana testing facility or retail marijuana testing facility for good cause as defined by rules promulgated by the state licensing authority, which must include but may not be limited to when an application for accreditation has been submitted and is pending with a recognized accrediting body.
- The state licensing authority shall promulgate rules that prevent redundant testing of marijuana and marijuana concentrate, including, but not limited to, potency testing of marijuana allocated to extractions, and residual solvent testing of marijuana concentrate when all inputs of the marijuana concentrate have passed residual solvent testing pursuant to this subsection (2)(d).
- Security requirements for any premises licensed pursuant to this article 10, including, at a minimum, lighting, physical security, video, and alarm requirements, and other minimum procedures for internal control as deemed necessary by the state licensing authority to properly administer and enforce the provisions of this article 10, including reporting requirements for changes, alterations, or modifications to the premises;
-
Labeling requirements for regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products sold by a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business that are at least as stringent as those imposed by section 25-4-1614 (3)(a) and include but are not limited to:
- Warning labels;
- Amount of THC per serving and the number of servings per package for regulated marijuana products;
- A universal symbol indicating that the package contains marijuana; and
- Potency of the regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products;
- Health and safety regulations and standards for the manufacture of regulated marijuana products and the cultivation of regulated marijuana;
- Regulation of the storage of, warehouses for, and transportation of regulated marijuana and regulated marijuana products;
- Sanitary requirements for medical marijuana businesses and retail marijuana businesses, including but not limited to sanitary requirements for the preparation of regulated marijuana products;
- The reporting and transmittal of monthly sales tax payments by medical marijuana stores and retail marijuana stores and any applicable excise tax payments by retail marijuana cultivation facilities;
- Authorization for the department to have access to licensing information to ensure sales, excise, and income tax payment and the effective administration of this article 10;
- Compliance with, enforcement of, or violation of any provision of this article 10, section 18-18-406.3 (7), or any rule promulgated pursuant to this article 10, including procedures and grounds for denying, suspending, fining, restricting, or revoking a state license issued pursuant to this article 10;
- Establishing a schedule of penalties and procedures for issuing and appealing citations for violation of statutes and rules and issuing administrative citations;
- Medical marijuana transporter licensed businesses and retail marijuana transporter licensed businesses, including requirements for drivers, including obtaining and maintaining a valid Colorado driver's license; insurance requirements; acceptable time frames for transport, storage, and delivery; requirements for transport vehicles; requirements for deliveries; and requirements for licensed premises;
- Medical marijuana business operator licenses and retail marijuana business operator licensees, including the form and structure of allowable agreements between operators and the medical or retail marijuana business;
- Unescorted visitors in limited access areas;
- Temporary appointee registrations issued pursuant to section 44-10-401 (3), including occupational and business registration requirements; application time frames; notification requirements; issuance, expiration, renewal, suspension, and revocation of a temporary appointee registration; and conditions of registration;
- Requirements for a centralized distribution permit for medical marijuana cultivation facilities or retail marijuana cultivation facilities issued pursuant to section 44-10-502 (6) or 44-10-602 (7), including but not limited to permit application requirements and privileges and restrictions of a centralized distribution permit;
- Requirements for issuance of colocation permits to a marijuana research and development licensee authorizing colocation with a medical marijuana products manufacturer or retail marijuana products manufacturer licensed premises, including application requirements, eligibility, restrictions to prevent cross-contamination and to ensure physical separation of inventory and research activities, and other privileges and restrictions of permits;
- Development of individual identification cards for natural persons who are controlling beneficial owners, and any person operating, working in, or having unescorted access to the limited access areas of the licensed premises of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business including a fingerprint-based criminal history record check as may be required by the state licensing authority prior to issuing a card;
- Identification of state licensees and their controlling beneficial owners, passive beneficial owners, managers, and employees;
- The specification of acceptable forms of picture identification that a medical marijuana store or retail marijuana store may accept when verifying a sale, including but not limited to government-issued identification cards;
- State licensing procedures, including procedures for renewals, reinstatements, initial licenses, and the payment of licensing fees;
- The conditions under which a licensee is authorized to transfer fibrous waste to a person for the purpose of producing only industrial fiber products. The conditions must include contract requirements that stipulate that the fibrous waste will only be used to produce industrial fiber products; record-keeping requirements; security measures related to the transport and transfer of fibrous waste; requirements for handling contaminated fibrous waste; and processes associated with handling fibrous waste. The rules must not require licensees to alter fibrous waste from its natural state prior to transfer.
- Requiring that edible regulated marijuana products be clearly identifiable, when practicable, with a standard symbol indicating that they contain marijuana and are not for consumption by children. The symbols promulgated by rule of the state licensing authority must not appropriate signs or symbols associated with another Colorado business or industry;
- Requirements to prevent the sale or diversion of retail marijuana and retail marijuana products to persons under twenty-one years of age;
- The implementation of an accelerator program including but not limited to rules to establish requirements for social equity licensees operating on the same licensed premises or on separate premises possessed by an accelerator-endorsed licensee. The state licensing authority's rules establishing an accelerator program may include requirements for severed custodianship of regulated marijuana products, protections of the intellectual property of a social equity licensee, incentives for accelerator-endorsed licensees, and additional requirements if a person applying for an accelerator endorsement has less than two years' experience operating a licensed facility pursuant to this article 10. An accelerator-endorsed licensee is not required to exercise the privileges of its license on the premises where a social equity licensee operates. The state licensing authority's implementation of an accelerator program is extended from July 1, 2020, to January 1, 2021.
-
Conditions under which a licensee is authorized to collect marijuana consumer waste and transfer it to a person for the purposes of reuse or recycling in accordance with all requirements established by the department of public health and environment pertaining to waste disposal and recycling. The conditions must include:
- That the person receiving marijuana consumer waste from a licensee is, to the extent required by law, registered with the department of public health and environment;
- Record-keeping requirements;
- Security measures related to the collection and transfer of marijuana consumer waste;
- Health and safety requirements, including requirements for the handling of marijuana consumer waste; and
- Processes associated with handling marijuana consumer waste, including destruction of any remaining regulated marijuana in the marijuana consumer waste.
- Record-keeping requirements;
- Limits on the amount of medical marijuana and medical marijuana products and retail marijuana and retail marijuana products that may be carried in a delivery vehicle and delivered to a patient or parent or guardian or individual, which cannot exceed limits placed on sales at licensed medical marijuana stores;
- Limits on the amount of retail marijuana and retail marijuana products that may be carried in a delivery vehicle and delivered to an individual, which cannot exceed limits placed on sales at retail marijuana stores;
- Inventory tracking system requirements, which include the ability to determine the amount of medical marijuana a patient has purchased that day in real time by searching a patient registration number;
- Health and safety requirements for medical marijuana and medical marijuana products delivered to a patient or parent or guardian and for retail marijuana and retail marijuana products delivered to an individual;
- Confidentiality requirements to ensure that persons delivering medical marijuana and medical marijuana products or retail marijuana and retail marijuana products pursuant to this article 10 do not disclose personal identifying information to any person other than those who need that information in order to take, process, or deliver the order or as otherwise required or authorized by this article 10, title 18, or title 25;
- An application fee and annual renewal fee for the medical marijuana delivery permit and the retail marijuana delivery permit. The amount of the fee must reflect the expected costs of administering the medical marijuana delivery permit and the retail marijuana delivery permit and may be adjusted by the state licensing authority to reflect the permit's actual direct and indirect costs.
- The permitted hours of delivery of medical marijuana and medical marijuana products and retail marijuana and retail marijuana products;
- Requirements for areas where medical marijuana and medical marijuana products or retail marijuana and retail marijuana products orders are stored, weighed, packaged, prepared, and tagged, including requirements that medical marijuana and medical marijuana products or retail marijuana and retail marijuana products cannot be placed into a delivery vehicle until after an order has been placed and that all delivery orders must be packaged on the licensed premises of a medical marijuana store or retail marijuana store or its associated state licensing authority-authorized storage facility as defined by rule after an order has been received; and
- Payment methods, including but not limited to the use of gift cards and prepayment accounts.
- Requirements for a transition permit for medical marijuana cultivation facilities or retail marijuana cultivation facilities issued pursuant to section 44-10-313 (13)(c), including but not limited to permit application requirements and restrictions of a transition permit.
-
Requirements for medical marijuana and medical marijuana products delivery as described in section 44-10-501 (11) and section 44-10-505 (5) and retail marijuana and retail marijuana products delivery as described in section 44-10-601 (13) and section 44-10-605 (5), including:
(I) Qualifications and eligibility requirements for licensed medical marijuana stores, retail marijuana stores, medical marijuana transporters, and retail marijuana transporters applying for a medical marijuana delivery permit;
(II) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (2)(dd)(II) is effective until January 1, 2023. ] Training requirements for personnel of medical marijuana stores, retail marijuana stores, medical marijuana transporters, and retail marijuana transporters that hold a medical marijuana or retail marijuana delivery permit who will deliver medical marijuana or medical marijuana products or retail marijuana or retail marijuana products pursuant to this article 10 and requirements that medical marijuana stores, retail marijuana stores, medical marijuana transporters, and retail marijuana transporters obtain a responsible vendor designation pursuant to section 44-10-1201 prior to conducting a delivery;
(II) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (2)(dd)(II) is effective January 1, 2023. ] Training requirements for personnel of medical marijuana stores, retail marijuana stores, medical marijuana transporters, and retail marijuana transporters that hold a medical marijuana or retail marijuana delivery permit who will deliver medical marijuana or medical marijuana products or retail marijuana or retail marijuana products pursuant to this article 10 and requirements that medical marijuana stores, retail marijuana stores, medical marijuana transporters, and retail marijuana transporters be considered to have a responsible vendor designation pursuant to section 44-10-1201 prior to conducting a delivery;
(III) Procedures for proof of medical marijuana registry and age identification and verification;
(IV) Security requirements;
(V) Delivery vehicle requirements, including requirements for surveillance;
-
(I) (A) Ownership and financial disclosure procedures and requirements pursuant to this article 10;
(B) Records a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business is required to maintain regarding its controlling beneficial owners, passive beneficial owners, and indirect financial interest holders that may be subject to disclosure at renewal or as part of any other investigation following initial licensure of a medical marijuana business or retail marijuana business;
(C) Procedures and requirements for findings of suitability pursuant to this article 10, including fees necessary to cover the direct and indirect costs of any suitability investigation;
(D) Procedures and requirements concerning the divestiture of the beneficial ownership of a person found unsuitable by the state licensing authority;
(E) Procedures, processes, and requirements for transfers of ownership involving a publicly traded corporation, including but not limited to mergers with a publicly traded corporation, investment by a publicly traded corporation, and public offerings;
(F) Designation of persons that by virtue of common control constitute controlling beneficial owners;
(G) Modification of the percentage of owner