Chapter 1 DEFINITIONS

Sec.

§ 40-101. Definitions.

Words and phrases as used in this title are defined in sections 40-102 through 40-127, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-101, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-101, which comprised R.S., § 850; reen. R.C. & C.L. § 874; C.S., § 1302; I.C.A.,§ 39-100, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

§ 40-102. Definitions — A.

    1. “Access easement” also commonly and sometimes legally referred to as a “deeded access” means a property right running with the land and appurtenant thereto for purposes of vehicular ingress and egress at a designated location from private property to the public highway or public right-of-way created by a written document, contract or deed by exception between the state or any political subdivision of the state of Idaho and the landowner. If the easement does not specify the type of use which may be made of the easement, for example, farm access, heavy industrial, etc., the easement is not limited to any type(s) of access. (1)(a) “Access easement” also commonly and sometimes legally referred to as a “deeded access” means a property right running with the land and appurtenant thereto for purposes of vehicular ingress and egress at a designated location from private property to the public highway or public right-of-way created by a written document, contract or deed by exception between the state or any political subdivision of the state of Idaho and the landowner. If the easement does not specify the type of use which may be made of the easement, for example, farm access, heavy industrial, etc., the easement is not limited to any type(s) of access.
    2. If the governmental entity with jurisdiction over the road that the property has a “deeded access” to denies the property owner the right to use the easement, the denial shall constitute a taking of the access right for which just compensation shall be owed.
  1. “Activities, commercial or industrial.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  2. “Advertising business, outdoor.” (See “Outdoor advertising business,” section 40-116, Idaho Code)
  3. “Advertising display” means advertising structures and signs.
  4. “Advertising structure(s)” or “structure(s)” or “sign(s)” means any thing designed, intended or used to advertise or inform. “Advertising structure” or “sign” does not include:
    1. Official notices issued by any court or public body or officer.
    2. Notices posted by any public officer in performance of a public duty or by any person in giving legal notice.
    3. Directional, warning or information structures required by or authorized by law, informational or directional signs regarding telephone service, emergency telephone signs, buried or underground cable markers and above cable closures.
    4. An official or public structure erected near a city or county, and within its territorial or zoning jurisdiction, which contains the name of the city or county, provided the same is maintained wholly at public expense. Where a city has been bypassed, but remains within five (5) miles of an interstate highway or primary freeway, the Idaho transportation board, in its discretion, may grant the city the right to erect and maintain a billboard displaying the name of the city at a location not to exceed one (1) mile from an interchange primarily serving that city. Billboards erected must be at locations consistent with department regulations and safety standards.
  5. “Agency,” as applied to highway relocation assistance as provided by chapter 20, title 40, Idaho Code, means any subdivision or entity of state or local government in the state of Idaho authorized by law to engage in any highway program or perform any highway project in which the acquisition of real property may result in the displacement of any person.
  6. “Alternate technical concept (ATC)” means an alternative to the base technical concept that promotes innovation and is equal or better in quality or effect, as determined by the department in its sole discretion.
  7. “Areas, commercial or industrial, unzoned.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  8. “Areas, urban.” (See “Urban areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  9. “Automobile graveyard” means any establishment or place of business which is maintained, used, or operated, for storing, keeping, buying, or selling wrecked, scrapped, ruined, or dismantled motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts. (11) “Average annual net earnings,” for the purposes of section 40-2004, Idaho Code, means one-half (½) of any net earnings of the business or farm operations, before federal, state and local income taxes, during the two (2) taxable years immediately preceding the taxable year in which the business or farm operation moves from the real property acquired for the project, or during any other period as the agency determines to be more equitable for establishing the earnings, and includes any compensation paid by the business or farm operation to the owner, his spouse, or his dependents during the two (2) year period, or any other period as determined by the agency.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-102, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 1, p. 777; am. 2012, ch. 323, § 1, p. 882.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-102, which comprised R.C., § 2874a, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 167; reen. C.L., § 874a; C.S. § 1303; I.C.A.,§ 39-102, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsection (6) and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 323, added subsection (1) and renumbered the subsequent subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

Section 2 of S.L. 2012, ch. 323 declared an emergency. Approved April 5, 2012.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

§ 40-103. Definitions — B.

  1. “Base technical concept” means the project specific concepts and technical information provided in the request for proposals upon which design-build firms will develop their technical and price proposals.
  2. “Best value selection” means any selection process in which proposals contain both price and qualitative components and award is based upon a combination of price and qualitative considerations.
  3. “Board” means the Idaho transportation board.
  4. “Business” means any lawful activity, excepting a farm operation, conducted primarily for the purchase, resale, lease and rental of personal and real property, and for the manufacture, processing or marketing of products, commodities, or other personal property; for the sale of services to the public; or solely for the purpose of section 40-2004(1), Idaho Code, for assisting in the purchase, sale, resale, manufacture, processing, or marketing of products, commodities, personal property, or services by the erection and maintenance of an outdoor advertising display or displays, whether or not displays are located on the premises on which any of the activities are conducted.
  5. “Business entity” means a corporation, professional corporation, limited liability company, professional limited liability company, general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, professional limited liability partnership or any other form of business except a sole proprietorship.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-103, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 2, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 1 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-106. 1951, ch. 93, § 1, p. 165.

40-107. 1951, ch. 93, § 2, p. 165; 1966 (2nd E.S.), ch. 13, § 1, p. 20.

40-108. 1951, ch. 93, § 3, p. 165.

40-109. 1951, ch. 93, § 4, p. 165; am. 1963, ch. 294, § 1, p. 774.

40-110. 1951, ch. 93, § 5, p. 165. 40-111. I.C.,§ 40-111, as added by 1974, ch. 12, § 2, p. 61; am. 1982, ch. 95, § 132, p. 185.

40-112. 1951, ch. 93, § 7, p. 165; am. 1955, ch. 260, § 7, p. 623; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 3, p. 61.

40-113. 1951, ch. 93, § 8, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 4, p. 61.

40-114. 1951, ch. 93, § 9, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 5, p. 61.

40-115. 1951, ch. 93, § 10, p. 165; am. 1971, ch. 136, § 25, p. 522.

40-116. 1951, ch. 93, § 11, p. 165.

40-117. 1951, ch. 93, § 12, p. 165; am. 1971, ch. 190, § 1, p. 873; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 6, p. 61; am. 1974, ch. 161, § 1, p. 1395; 1976, ch. 358, § 1, p. 1175; am. 1980, ch. 247, § 40, p. 582.

40-118. 1951, ch. 93, § 13, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 7, p. 61.

40-119. 1951, ch. 93, § 14, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 8, p. 61.

40-120. 1951, ch. 93, § 15; am. 1955, ch. 260, § 2, p. 263; am. 1957, ch. 227, § 1, p. 520; am. 1959, ch. 251, § 1, p. 532; am. 1961, ch. 264, § 1, p. 465; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 9, p. 61; am. 1978, ch. 282, § 1, p. 684; am. 1981, ch. 119, § 1, p. 203; am. 1982, ch. 95, § 133, p. 185; am. 1982, ch. 306, § 1, p. 768.

40-121. 1951, ch. 93, § 16, p. 165; am. 1955, ch. 260, § 3, p. 623; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 10, p. 61; am. 1983, ch. 234, § 1, p. 637.

40-122. 1951, ch. 93, § 17, p. 165.

40-123. 1951, ch. 93, § 18, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 11, p. 61.

40-125. 1951, ch. 93, § 20, p. 165; am. 1971, ch. 136, § 26, p. 522; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 13, p. 61.

40-126. 1951, ch. 93, § 21, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 14, p. 61.

40-127. 1951, ch. 93, § 22, p. 165.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (1), (2), and (5), and redesignated the other subsections accordingly.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

CASE NOTES

Cited

Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1988).

§ 40-104. Definitions — C.

  1. “City system” means all public highways within the corporate limits of a city, with a functioning street department, except those highways which are under federal control, a part of the state highway system, part of a highway district system or an extension of a rural major collector route as specified in section 40-607, Idaho Code.
  2. “Commercial activities.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  3. “Commercial areas, unzoned.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  4. “Commissioners” means the board of county commissioners of a county of this state.
  5. “Construction manager/general contractor firm” means a business entity with which the department has contracted to provide services prior to the final design phase and provide for the construction of the project during the construction phase.
  6. “Construction manager/general contractor project” means a project where the department retains a consultant or has on staff an Idaho licensed professional engineer to develop the design and also hires a construction manager/general contractor firm to provide services prior to the final design. If a guaranteed maximum price is negotiated successfully, the construction manager/general contractor firm also provides for construction of the project.
  7. “Consultant” means an individual or business entity possessing the qualifications to provide licensed architectural, licensed engineering, or licensed land surveying services or possessing specialized credentials and qualifications.
  8. “Controlled-access facility” means a highway especially designed for through traffic to which owners or occupants of abutting land have no right or easement or only a controlled right or easement of access by reason of the fact that their property abuts upon the controlled-access facility. These highways may be freeways open to use by all customary forms of highway traffic, or they may be parkways from which trucks, buses and other commercial vehicles shall be excluded.
  9. “County highway system” or “county secondary highways” mean all public highways in a county except those included within the state highway system, those under another state agency, those included within city highway systems of incorporated cities, those included within a highway district highway system, and those under federal control.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-104, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 1, p. 803; am. 1994, ch. 324, § 1, p. 1039; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 3, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-104 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (5) through (7) and redesignated the other subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

CASE NOTES

County Highway System.

All public roadways not included in the federal highway system the state highway system, or a city street system, are necessarily a part of the county highway system. Lido Van & Storage, Inc. v. Kuck, 110 Idaho 939, 719 P.2d 1199 (1986).

Because five years passed with no public use or maintenance on a gravel boundary road, the road ceased to be defined as a public road; the abandonment did not require any formal action by county commissioners. John W. Brown Props. v. Blaine County, 138 Idaho 171, 59 P.3d 976 (2002).

Jurisdiction Over Streets.

If a city does not follow the procedures set forth for altering a highway district, it does not obtain jurisdiction over streets located inside of the district; therefore, a district court erred by granting a city’s motion for partial summary judgment in a case where the city sought to obtain jurisdiction over streets in a highway district by merely establishing a functioning street department. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

Cited

French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988); Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Acceptance and Use of Highway.
City Streets.

Where in an action by plaintiff residents of an unincorporated area of a county to have certain roads declared public highways and to require the county to maintain the roads, the evidence showed that the county had regularly maintained the roads for approximately nine years, that the roads had been extensively used by the general public, and that the sales of several lots within the area had been made with particular reliance upon several written representations made by various members of the board of county commissioners that the roads would be maintained by the county, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the county because a substantial fact issue existed as to whether the county had accepted the roads. Pugmire v. Johnson, 102 Idaho 882, 643 P.2d 832 (1982). City Streets.

A street within a city was a highway within the meaning of the law imposing a tax upon gasoline, and the municipality could not escape its liability for such tax on the ground that it did not use the highway of the state, since the municipality receives benefits by reason of the state highway surrounding it. State ex rel. Pfost v. Boise City, 57 Idaho 507, 66 P.2d 1016 (1937).

Judicial Notice.

The court would take judicial notice of the order of board of highway directors (now transportation board) fixing and designating 35 miles per hour as the reasonable, safe, prima facie speed limit on certain portion of U.S. Highway 30, and of the fact that the section of the highway to which it relates is a part of the “state highway system.” State v. Wendler, 83 Idaho 213, 360 P.2d 697 (1961).

§ 40-105. Definitions — D.

  1. “Department” means the Idaho transportation department.
  2. “Design-build contract” means a single contract between the department and a design-build firm to furnish the architectural or engineering and related design services, labor, material, supplies, equipment, and construction services for the highway project.
  3. “Design-build firm” means a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability partnership, joint venture, corporation, any type of limited liability company, professional corporation or legal entity qualified to design and build highway projects.
  4. “Design-build project” means a project for which both the design and construction of the project are procured by the department in a single contract with a design-build firm capable of providing the necessary design services and construction.
  5. “Designer” means a duly licensed individual or business entity who performs the engineering design and related design work for a design-build firm.
  6. “Designer qualifications” means the criteria used to evaluate the design-build firm’s designer(s).
  7. “Director” means the director of the Idaho transportation department.
  8. “Displaced person” means any individual, family, business or farm operation which moves from real property or moves personal property from real property acquired for a program or project of a state or local agency, in whole or in part, or as the result of a written order of an acquiring agency to vacate real property for a program or project of a state or local agency, and, solely for the purposes of section 40-2004, Idaho Code, as a result of a written order of an acquiring agency to vacate other real property, on which a person conducts a business or farm operation, for a program or project of any state or local agency.
  9. “Draw” means making a cash demand on the proceeds of transportation bonds or notes issued by the Idaho housing and finance association as it pertains to section 40-718, Idaho Code.
  10. “Dump” means any place or area, not operated as a business, where junk is deposited, stored or kept.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-105, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2005, ch. 378, § 1, p. 1217; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 4, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho housing and finance association,§ 67-6201 et seq.

Idaho transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-105 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (2) through (6) and redesignated the other subsections accordingly.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-106. Definitions — E.

  1. “Erect” means to construct, build, raise, assemble, place, affix, create, paint, draw or in any other way bring into being or establish, but does not include any of the foregoing activities when performed incident to the change of an advertising message or customary maintenance of a sign. With respect to certain easements held by the state restricting the erection of structures on certain lands, the state of Idaho and the department shall be deemed to have waived such restrictions with regard only to each sign erected prior to October 22, 1965.
  2. “Expenditure” means the awarding of a contract, franchise or authority to another by a district, and every manner and means whereby the highway district disburses district funds or obligates itself to disburse district funds. “Expenditure” does not include disbursement of district funds to regularly employed highway district employees, officials or agents, or for the performance of personal services to the district, or for the acquisition of personal property through a contract that has been competitively bid by the state of Idaho, one of its subdivisions, or an agency of the federal government.
  3. “Expense of the public” means the expenditure of funds for roadway maintenance by any governmental agency, including funds expended by any agency of the federal government, so long as the agency allows public access over the roadway on which the funds were expended and such roadway is not located on federal or state-owned land.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-106, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 1, p. 1505; am. 2003, ch. 67, § 1, p. 226.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-106 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-107. Definitions — F.

  1. “Facilities” mean tracks, pipes, mains, conduits, cables, wires, towers, poles, equipment and appliances.
  2. “Family” means two (2) or more persons living together in the same dwelling unit who are related to each other by blood, marriage, adoption or legal guardianship.
  3. “Farm operation” means any activity conducted primarily for the production of agricultural products or commodities, including timber, for sale and home use, and producing agricultural products or commodities in sufficient quantity to contribute materially to the operator’s support.
  4. “Feeder highway” means any highway which, in the opinion of the transportation board, is needed to create or facilitate access to a turnpike project upon which a toll is charged for transit.
  5. “Federal land rights-of-way” mean rights-of-way on federal land within the context of revised statute 2477, codified as 43 U.S.C. 932, and other federal access grants and shall be considered to be any road, trail, access or way upon which construction has been carried out to the standard in which public rights-of-way were built within historic context. These rights-of-way may include, but not be limited to, horse paths, cattle trails, irrigation canals, waterways, ditches, pipelines or other means of water transmission and their attendant access for maintenance, wagon roads, jeep trails, logging roads, homestead roads, mine to market roads and all other ways.
  6. “Final design” means any design activities following preliminary design and includes the preparation of final construction plans and detailed specifications for the performance of construction work.
  7. “Fixed price-best design” means a selection process in which the contract price is established by the department and stated in the request for proposals. Design solutions and other qualitative factors are evaluated and rated, with award going to the design-build firm offering the best qualitative proposal for the established price.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-107, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 142, § 2, p. 375; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 5, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-107 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (6) and (7).

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 1993, ch. 142 read: “The State of Idaho recognizes that existing federal land rights of way are extremely important to all of Idaho’s citizens. Two-thirds of Idaho’s land is under control of the federal government and access to such federal lands is integral to public use. The Idaho State legislature recognizes the necessity for establishing a procedure for identifying and confirming the existence of previously established federal rights of way, to protect those rights previously granted to and vested in, the citizens of Idaho.”

Federal References.

Revised statutes 2477, referred to in subsection (5) and codified as 43 U.S.C. 932, was repealed by P.L. 94-579, effective October 21, 1976.

Effective Dates.

Section 4 of S.L. 1993, ch. 142 declared an emergency. Approved March 25, 1993.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-108. Definitions — G.

  1. “GARVEE” means grant anticipation revenue vehicle, a debt financing instrument which enables states to finance state transportation infrastructure projects and to pay debt service and other bond-related expenses with future federal-aid highway apportionments.
  2. “Guaranteed maximum price (GMP)” means the total maximum price that includes all reimbursable costs and fees, except for material changes in the scope of work, for completion of a construction manager/general contractor contract that is provided by the selected contractor and accepted by the department.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-108, as added by 2005, ch. 378, § 2, p. 1217; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 6, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-108 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsection (2).

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the GARVEE transportation program, see http://www.itd.idaho.gov/Projects/garvee/default.asp .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-109. Definitions — H.

  1. “Highway district system” means all public highways within each highway district, except those included within the state highway system, those under another state agency, those included within city highway systems of incorporated cities with a functioning street department, and those under federal control.
  2. “Highway system, county.” (See “County highway system,” section 40-104, Idaho Code)
  3. “Highway system, state.” (See “State highway system,” section 40-120, Idaho Code)
  4. “Highway users’ fund bonds” mean those bonds issued for and on behalf of dissolved city highway systems or highway districts, and the funds out of which those bonds are repayable shall be the moneys received or provided by section 40-707, Idaho Code.
  5. “Highways” mean roads, streets, alleys and bridges laid out or established for the public or dedicated or abandoned to the public. Highways shall include necessary culverts, sluices, drains, ditches, waterways, embankments, retaining walls, bridges, tunnels, grade separation structures, roadside improvements, adjacent lands or interests lawfully acquired, pedestrian facilities, and any other structures, works or fixtures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the highways. Roads laid out and recorded as highways, by order of a board of commissioners, and all roads used as such for a period of five (5) years, provided they shall have been worked and kept up at the expense of the public, or located and recorded by order of a board of commissioners, are highways.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-109, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 2, p. 803; am. 1988, ch. 184, § 1, p. 322; am. 1994, ch. 324, § 2, p. 1039.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-109 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1988, ch. 184 declared an emergency. Approved March 26, 1988.

CASE NOTES

Escape ramps. Highway district system.

Acceptance and Use as Highway.

Affidavits of former property owners showing that the public frequently and continuously used the road and that county trucks and other road equipment were used to repair and maintain the road over a 13-year span were sufficient to sustain a determination that the road had become a public highway. Blaine County v. Bryson, 109 Idaho 123, 705 P.2d 1078 (Ct. App. 1985).

Declaration of Public Road.

County had not abandoned a road by formal action, pursuant to§ 40-501, even though the road was not identified as part of the county road system pursuant to this section, because an action where the city rejected a claim to maintain the road did not amount to a finding, as required by the formal abandonment statute,§ 40-604(4), that the abandonment of the road was in the public interest. Farrell v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 378, 64 P.3d 304 (2002), overruled on other grounds, City of Osburn v. Randel, 152 Idaho 906, 277 P.3d 353 (2012).

Escape Ramps.

Based upon the definition of “highways” in this section, runaway escape ramps are, as a matter of law, part of the highway district road system, being roadside improvements, adjacent lands or interests lawfully acquired, pedestrian facilities, and any other structures, works or fixtures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the highways and under§ 40-1310 and§ 31-805, the highway district had a duty to maintain those runaway escape ramps as part of the highway district road system. Freeman v. Juker, 119 Idaho 555, 808 P.2d 1300 (1991).

Highway District System.

If a city does not follow the procedures set forth for altering a highway district, it does not obtain jurisdiction over streets located inside of the district; therefore, a district court erred by granting a city’s motion for partial summary judgment in a case where the city sought to obtain jurisdiction over streets in a highway district by merely establishing a functioning street department. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

Cited

French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988); Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1988); Stafford v. Klosterman, 134 Idaho 205, 998 P.2d 1118 (2000); E. Side Highway Dist. v. Delavan, — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2019 Ida. LEXIS 222 (Dec. 11, 2019).

Decisions Under Prior Law

Railroads. Streams.

In General.

In an action to compel the removal of a sign from a highway, the project involved was not limited to the actual roadway or traveled portion of the highway, but encompassed all the area within the limits of the right of way. State ex rel. Burns v. Kelly, 89 Idaho 139, 403 P.2d 566 (1965).

Abandonment.

Mere nonuser of a portion of the total width of the highway over a period of years does not constitute an abandonment; therefore defendants were estopped from claiming right and title due to occupation and use of land upon which obstruction stood without interruption for 30 years in spite of the fact that the area in dispute had not been used for highway purposes or kept up or maintained at public expense. Rich v. Burdick, 83 Idaho 335, 362 P.2d 1088 (1961).

Acceptance and Use as Highway.

In an action to establish a public highway, the evidence sustained a judgment for the defendant on the ground that there were no positive acts on the part of the public authorities clearly manifesting an intention to accept a trail as a public highway, as required by federal law, and the use of the trail by the public was merely casual and was insufficient to establish the highway. Kirk v. Schultz, 63 Idaho 278, 119 P.2d 266 (1941).

Acceptance of Congressional Grant.

Generally, in order to constitute an acceptance of the congressional grant of a right of way for public highway across public lands, there had to be either use by the public for such a period of time and under such conditions as to establish a highway under the state law, or there had to be some positive act or acts on the part of the proper public authorities clearly manifesting an intention to accept the grant with respect to the particular highway. Kirk v. Schultz, 63 Idaho 278, 119 P.2d 266 (1941).

Bridges.

Bridges were highways. Sandpoint v. Doyle, 14 Idaho 749, 95 P. 945 (1908); Bonneville County v. Bingham County, 24 Idaho 1, 132 P. 431 (1913); Independent Hwy. Dist. No. 2 v. Ada County, 24 Idaho 416, 134 P. 542 (1913); Good Road Dist. No. 2 v. Washington County, 27 Idaho 732, 152 P. 183 (1915).

Bridges were part of state highway system, and the legislature could authorize highway department (now Idaho transportation department) to purchase or build without contravening any constitutional inhibition. A purchase of a bridge was not a lending or pledging of the credit of the state to a private person or corporation. Lyons v. Bottolfsen, 61 Idaho 281, 101 P.2d 1 (1940).

Declaration of Public Road.

Declaration that road crossing landowner’s property was no more than a statement of the county’s intent to treat the road as public and did not amount to a taking of property. Evers v. County of Custer, 745 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1984).

Dedication.

Where a highway was dedicated to the public use as early as 1879, its width and boundary lines were properly established and are as shown by the surveys; therefore, the state was entitled to improve and expand the use of the highway to its entire width to meet increasing traffic demands. Rich v. Burdick, 83 Idaho 335, 362 P.2d 1088 (1961).

Maintenance of Highways.

Once thoroughfare was dedicated to the public, it became a highway; and while under former law regarding improvement of highways, it would appear that county must assume its maintenance since in counties with highway districts former law transferred the powers and duties over highways from the county commissioners to the highway board of the highway district, highway district had the duty to accept thoroughfare into its highway system and to begin providing maintenance; however, the decision to maintain it as a gravel road or to bring it up to the district’s minimum standards of highway construction rested within the discretion of the highway district. Harshbarger v. County of Jerome, 107 Idaho 805, 693 P.2d 451 (1984).

Railroads.

Railroads were not highways and were not liable under a tax statute for tax on gasoline used in gasoline engines on its tracks and rights of way. Oregon S.L.R.R. v. Pfost, 53 Idaho 559, 27 P.2d 877 (1933).

Streams.

Navigable streams were not highways within the meaning of R.S., 1887, § 850. Grice v. Clearwater Timber Co., 20 Idaho 70, 117 P. 112 (1911).

Unauthorized Dedication.

Private land owner had no power to dedicate to public any portion of railroad’s right of way. Palmer v. Northern Pac. R.R., 11 Idaho 583, 83 P. 947 (1905).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-110. Definitions — I.

  1. “Improved highway” means a graded and drained earth traveled way or better, to include one graded and graveled or with paved surface, and a graded and drained earth highway means a traveled way of natural earth, aligned and graded to permit reasonably convenient use by motor vehicles, and drained by a longitudinal and transverse system, natural or artificial, sufficient to prevent serious impairment of the highway by surface water.
  2. “Individual” means a person who is not a member of a family.
  3. “Industrial activities.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  4. “Industrial areas, unzoned.” (See “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas,” section 40-122, Idaho Code)
  5. “Information center” means any area or site established and maintained at a safety rest area on an interstate or primary highway by or under the supervision or control of the department, where panels for the display of advertising and informational signs may be erected and maintained.
  6. “Interchange area” means the commencing or ending at the beginning of pavement widening at the exit or entrance to the main traveled way of an interstate, primary freeway, or turnpike project.
  7. “Interstate system” or “interstate highway” means any portion of the national system of interstate and defense highways located within the state, as officially designated or as may be hereafter so designated, by the Idaho transportation board, and approved by the secretary of transportation, pursuant to the provisions of title 23, U.S. Code, “Highways”.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-110, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-110 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 40-111. Definitions — J.

  1. “Junk” means old or scrap copper, brass, rope, rags, batteries, paper, trash, rubber, debris, waste; junk, dismantled, or wrecked automobiles, or their parts; iron, steel and other scrap ferrous or nonferrous material.
  2. “Junkyard” means an establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated, or used for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard, and the term shall include garbage dumps and sanitary fills.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-111, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-111 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-112. Definitions

K. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-112 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-113. Definitions — L.

  1. “Lawfully maintained” means a sign maintained on private land in accordance with state law and with the consent or acquiescence of the owner, or his agent, of the property upon which the sign is located.
  2. “Local highway technical assistance council” means the public agency created in chapter 24, title 40, Idaho Code.
  3. “Local highway jurisdiction” means a county with jurisdiction over a highway system, a city with jurisdiction over a highway system, or a highway district.
  4. “Lowest price technically acceptable selection” means a type of process for selection of a design-build firm in which the department identifies evaluation factors that establish the minimum requirements of acceptability. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability based on qualitative factors, not cost or price, but are not ranked. The contract award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for qualitative factors.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-113, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 280, § 1, p. 867; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 7, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-113 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsection (4).

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-114. Definitions — M.

  1. “Main traveled way” means the portion of a roadway for the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders.
  2. “Maintain” or “place” means to allow to exist, subject to the provisions of chapter 19, title 40, Idaho Code.
  3. “Maintenance” means to preserve from failure or decline, or repair, refurbish, repaint or otherwise keep an existing highway or public right-of-way in a suitable state for use including, without limitation, snow removal, sweeping, litter control, weed abatement and placement or repair of public safety signage.
  4. “Mortgage” means a class of liens, including deeds of trust, as are commonly given to secure advances on, or the unpaid purchase price of, real property under the laws of the state of Idaho, together with the credit instruments, if any, secured by it.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-114, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2013, ch. 239, § 2, p. 560.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-114 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 239, substituted “public right-of-way in a suitable state for use including, without limitation, snow removal, sweeping, litter control, weed abatement and placement or repair of public safety signage” for “structure in a suitable state for use” in subsection (3).

Legislative Intent.
Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 2013.

§ 40-115. Definitions

N. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-115 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-116. Definitions — O.

  1. “Organizational conflict of interest” means that, because of other activities or relationships with other persons or entities, a person or entity is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the department or the person’s or entity’s objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired, or a person or entity has an unfair competitive advantage.
  2. “Outdoor advertising business” means the business or occupation of placing, erecting, constructing or maintaining advertising structures or signs. The term does not include the placing, erecting, constructing or maintaining of advertising displays exclusively pertaining to the business of the person placing the advertising display, but does include a person whenever he personally or through employees places advertising displays containing advertising which does not pertain exclusively to his own business.
  3. “Owner” means all persons and all political subdivisions of the state having any title or interest in any property, rights, easements and interests authorized to be acquired by chapter 3, title 40, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-116, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 8, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-116 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsection (1) and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-117. Definitions — P.

  1. “Person” includes every natural person, firm, fiduciary, copartnership, association, corporation, trustee, receiver or assignee for the benefit of creditors.
  2. “Place.” (See “Maintain,” section 40-114, Idaho Code)
  3. “Preliminary design,” as used in section 40-904, Idaho Code, means the general project location and design concepts. It includes, but is not limited to, preliminary engineering and other activities and analyses, such as environmental assessments, topographic surveys, metes and bounds surveys, geotechnical investigations, hydrologic analyses, hydraulic analyses, utility engineering, traffic studies, financial plans, revenue estimates, hazardous materials assessments, general estimates of the types and quantities of materials and other work needed to establish parameters for the final design.
  4. “Price proposal” means the price submitted by a design-build firm to provide the required design and construction services described in the request for proposals or the price submitted by a construction manager/general contractor firm to provide the required construction services described in the request for proposal.
  5. “Primary system” or “primary highway” means any portion of the highways of the state, as officially designated, or as may hereafter be so designated, by the Idaho transportation board, and approved by the secretary of transportation, pursuant to the provisions of title 23, U.S. Code, “Highways.”
  6. “Public highway agency” means the state transportation department, any city, county, highway district or other political subdivision of the state with jurisdiction over public highway systems and public rights-of-way.
  7. “Public highways” means all highways open to public use in the state, whether maintained by the state or by any county, highway district, city, or other political subdivision. (Also see “Highways,” section 40-109, Idaho Code)
  8. “Public land survey corner” means any point actually established and monumented in an original survey or resurvey that determines the boundaries of remaining public lands, or public lands patented, represented on an official plat and in the field notes thereof, accepted and approved under authority delegated by congress to the United States general land office and the United States department of interior, bureau of land management.
  9. “Public right-of-way” means a right-of-way open to the public and under the jurisdiction of a public highway agency, where the public highway agency has no obligation to construct or maintain, but may expend funds for the maintenance of, said public right-of-way or post traffic signs for vehicular traffic on said public right-of-way. In addition, a public right-of-way includes a right-of-way which was originally intended for development as a highway and was accepted on behalf of the public by deed of purchase, fee simple title, authorized easement, eminent domain, by plat, prescriptive use, or abandonment of a highway pursuant to section 40-203, Idaho Code, but shall not include federal land rights-of-way, as provided in section 40-204A, Idaho Code, that resulted from the creation of a facility for the transmission of water. Public rights-of-way shall not be considered improved highways for the apportionment of funds from the highway distribution account.
  10. “Public street” means a road, thoroughfare, alley, highway or bridge under the jurisdiction of a public highway agency. (11) “Public transportation services” means, but is not limited to, fixed transit routes, scheduled or unscheduled transit services provided by motor vehicle, bus, rail, van, aerial tramway and other modes of public conveyance; paratransit service for the elderly and disabled; shuttle and commuter service between cities, counties, health care facilities, employment centers, educational institutions or park-and-ride locations; subscription van and car pooling services; transportation services unique to social service programs; and the management and administration thereof.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-117, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 2, p. 1505; am. 2000, ch. 252, § 1, p. 716; am. 2000, ch. 417, § 1, p. 1328; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 9, p. 777; am. 2011, ch. 136, § 1, p. 383.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-117 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2000 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 252, § 1, substituted “right-of-way” for “right of way” throughout the section; in subsection (5), substituted “means” for “mean”; in subsection (6), substituted “, but may expend funds for the maintenance of, said public right-of-way or post traffic signs for vehicular traffic on said public right-of-way” for “said right of way for vehicular traffic”, and added the last two sentences.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 417, § 1, substituted “right-of-way” for “right of way” throughout the section; in subsection (5), substituted “means” for “mean”; and added subsection (7).

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (3) and (4) and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 136, added subsections (8) and (10) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 4 of S.L. 2000, ch. 252 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

CASE NOTES

Cited

French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988).

§ 40-118. Definitions

Q. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-118 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-119. Definitions — R.

  1. “Reference point” means a special monumented point that does not occupy the same geographical position as the corner itself, and where the spatial relationship to the corner is known and recorded, and that serves to locate the corner.
  2. “Request for proposals (RFP)” means a document used to solicit proposals from design-build firms to design and construct a highway project or to solicit proposals from construction manager/general contractor firms to provide services prior to final design and then construct a highway project.
  3. “Request for qualifications (RFQ)” means a document issued by the department in the first step of a two-step selection process that describes the project in enough detail to let potential design-build firms determine if they wish to compete and forms the basis for developing a short-list of the most qualified design-build firms.
  4. “Responsive proposals” means proposals submitted by responsive proposers that comply with the request for proposals and all prescribed procurement procedures and requirements.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-119, as added by 2010, ch. 293, § 10, p. 777; am. 2011, ch. 136, § 2, p. 383.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-119 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 136, added subsection (1) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The letters “RFP” and “RFQ” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-120. Definitions — S.

  1. “Safety rest area” means an area or site established and maintained within or adjacent to the right-of-way by or under public supervision or control, for convenience of the traveling public.
  2. “Short-listing” means the narrowing of the field of potential design-build firms through the selection of the most qualified design-build firms who have responded to a request for qualifications.
  3. “Sign.” (See “Advertising structure,” section 40-102, Idaho Code)
  4. “Single countywide highway district” means all public highways within the county, including those within all cities of the county, but excepting those within the state highway system and those under federal control.
  5. “State highway system” means the principal highway arteries in the state, including connecting arteries and extensions through cities, and includes roads to every county seat in the state.
  6. “State law” means a provision of the constitution or statutes of this state, or an ordinance, rule or regulation enacted or adopted by an agency or political subdivision of this state pursuant to the constitution or statutes.
  7. “Stipend” means a monetary amount that may be paid to unsuccessful design-build firms who have submitted responsive proposals in response to an RFP. The purpose of a stipend is to encourage competition by offering to compensate responsive but unsuccessful design-build firms for a portion of the proposal development costs.
  8. “Street” means a thoroughfare, alley, highway or a right-of-way that may be open for public use but is not part of a public highway system nor under the jurisdiction of a public highway agency.
  9. “Structure.” (See “Advertising structure,” section 40-102, Idaho Code)
  10. “System, city.” (See “City system,” section 40-104, Idaho Code)
History.

I.C.,§ 40-120, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 11, p. 777; am. 2011, ch. 136, § 3, p. 383.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-120 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (2) and (7) and redesignated the other subsections accordingly.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 136, added subsection (8) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

CASE NOTES

State Highway System.

In a prosecution against Indian tribe member for leaving the scene of an accident and for aggravated driving under the influence, where the defendant challenged the state’s jurisdiction over a section of U.S. Highway 95 that is within the boundaries of an Indian reservation, the trial court could have taken judicial notice of the “Official Highway Map” which the Idaho transportation department periodically issues and widely distributes for convenience of motorists; while these maps may not be conclusive on the subject of “principal” highways, they are reliable authority. State v. Smith, 124 Idaho 671, 862 P.2d 1093 (Ct. App. 1993).

§ 40-121. Definitions — T.

  1. “Technical proposal” means that portion of a design-build firm proposal that contains design solutions and other qualitative factors that are provided in response to a request for proposals.
  2. “Tourist related advertising sign” means any sign which advertises a specific public or private facility, accommodation or service, at a particular location or site, including: overnight lodging, a camp site, food service, recreational facility, tourist attraction, education or historical site or feature, automotive service, facility or garage.
  3. “Turnpike project” means any express highway or bridge at locations and between terminals as may be established by the board and constructed or to be constructed under the provisions of chapter 4, title 40, Idaho Code, and shall include all bridges, tunnels, overpasses, underpasses, interchanges, entrance plazas, approaches, toll houses, service areas, service stations, service facilities, communication facilities, and administration, storage and other buildings, which the board may deem necessary for the operation of a project, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests which may be acquired by the board for the construction or the operation of a project.
  4. “Turnpike revenue bonds” mean bonds of the transportation board authorized under the provisions of section 40-412, et seq., Idaho Code.
  5. “Two-step selection” means a procurement process in which the first step consists of short-listing based on statements of qualifications submitted in response to a request for qualifications and the second step consists of the submission of price and technical proposals in response to a request for proposals.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-121, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 12, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-121 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, added subsections (1) and (5) and redesignated the other subsections accordingly.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-122. Definitions — U.

  1. “Unzoned commercial or industrial areas” mean those areas not zoned by state or local law, regulation or ordinance which are occupied by industrial or commercial activities, other than outdoor advertising signs, and the lands along the highway for a distance of six hundred (600) feet immediately abutting to the area of the activities. All measurements shall be from the outer edge of the regularly used buildings, parking lots, storage or processing areas of the activities, and shall be along or parallel to the edge of pavement of the highway.
    1. Agricultural, forestry, grazing, farming and related activities including wayside fresh produce stands.
    2. Transient or temporary activities.
    3. Activities not visible from the main traveled way.
    4. Activities conducted in a building principally used as a residence.
    5. Railroad tracks and minor sidings.
  2. “Urban areas” mean any geographical area within the city limits of any incorporated city having a population of five thousand (5,000) or more inhabitants. Population numbers referred to shall be determined by the latest United States census.
  3. “Utility” means any publicly, privately or cooperatively owned utility.

“Commercial or industrial activities” mean those activities generally recognized as commercial or industrial by zoning authorities in the state, except that none of the following activities shall be considered commercial or industrial:

History.

I.C.,§ 40-122, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-122 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-123. Definitions — V.

  1. “Visible” means capable of being seen without visual aid by a person of normal visual acuity.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-123, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-123 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was enacted with a subsection (1), but no subsection (2).

§ 40-124. Definitions — W.

“Witness corner” means a monumented point on a lot line or boundary line of a survey, near a corner and established in situations where it is impracticable to occupy or monument the corner.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-124, as added by 2011, ch. 136, § 4, p. 383.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-124 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-125. Definitions

X. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-125 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-126. Definitions

Y. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-126 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-127. Definitions

Z. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-127 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-103.

§ 40-128 — 40-143. Highway administrative act of 1951 — Traffic safety commission — Creation, powers and duties. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 1 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-128. 1951, ch. 93, § 23, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 15, p. 61.

40-129. 1951, ch. 93, § 24, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 16, p. 61.

40-130. 1951, ch. 93, § 25, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 17, p. 61.

40-131. 1951, ch. 93, § 26, p. 165; am. 1967, ch. 238, § 1, p. 697; am. 1970, ch. 52, § 1, p. 117.

40-132. 1951, ch. 93, § 27, p. 165; am. 1953, ch. 55, § 1, p. 76.

40-133. 1951, ch. 93, § 28, p. 165; am. 1965, ch. 131, § 1, p. 259.

40-134. 1951, ch. 93, § 29, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 18, p. 61.

40-135. 1951, ch. 93, § 30, p. 165.

40-136. 1951, ch. 93, § 31, p. 165.

40-137. 1951, ch. 93, § 32, p. 165; am. 1971, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1344; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 19, p. 61; am. 1979, ch. 287, § 1, p. 732.

40-138. 1951, ch. 93, § 33, p. 165.

40-139. 1951, ch. 93, § 34, p. 165; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 20, p. 61.

40-140. 1951, ch. 93, § 37, p. 165.

40-141. 1951, ch. 93, § 38, p. 165.

§ 40-144, 40-145. Department of highways supervisory employees, designation — Approval by state board of examiners. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 41, §§ 3 and 4, were repealed by S.L. 1969, ch. 176; § 10.

§ 40-146. Joint operation of ports of entry. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-146, as added by 1983, ch. 152, § 1, p. 406, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253.

Chapter 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.

§ 40-201. State highway, county highway, highway districts and city highway systems established.

There shall be a system of state highways in the state, a system of county highways in each county, a system of highways in each highway district, and a system of highways in each city, except as otherwise provided. The improvement of highways and highway systems is hereby declared to be the established and permanent policy of the state of Idaho, and the duty is hereby imposed upon the state, and all counties, cities, and highway districts in the state, to improve and maintain the highways within their respective jurisdiction as hereinafter defined, within the limits of the funds available.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-201, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 206, § 1, p. 512; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 3, p. 803; am. 1987, ch. 130, § 1, p. 261.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 2 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-201. 1929, ch. 169, § 1, p. 302; I.C.A.,§ 39-201; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 23, p. 61.

40-202. 1929, ch. 169, § 2, p. 302; I.C.A.,§ 39-202; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 24, p. 61.

40-203. 1929, ch. 169, § 3, p. 302; I.C.A.,§ 39-203; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 25, p. 61.

CASE NOTES

Designation of Public Roadways.

Commissioners, who had designated roads that ran across private land as public, erred by placing the roadways on an official map as public, and then requiring the landowners to initiate proceedings to vacate the decision. The commissioners were required to prove the public status of the disputed roads. Homestead Farms, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 141 Idaho 855, 119 P.3d 630 (2005).

Rule-making Authority.
State Highway System.

Where the legislature enacts a statute requiring that an administrative agency carry out specific functions, i.e., furnish, erect and maintain signs on side highways, that agency cannot validly subvert the legislation by promulgating contradictory rules; thus, although the legislature delegated some rule-making authority to the DOT to adopt specifications for a uniform system of traffic-control devices, the department was not thereby permitted to institute rules or policies limiting its ability to achieve its express statutory duties to place signs on side roads. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991). State Highway System.

In a prosecution against Indian tribe member for leaving the scene of an accident and for aggravated driving under the influence, where the defendant challenged the state’s jurisdiction over a section of U.S. highway 95 that is within the boundaries of an Indian reservation, the trial court could have taken judicial notice of the “Official Highway Map” which the Idaho Transportation Department periodically issues and widely distributes for convenience of motorists; while these maps may not be conclusive on the subject of “principal” highways, they are reliable authority. State v. Smith, 124 Idaho 671, 862 P.2d 1093 (Ct. App. 1993).

Responsibility of maintaining state highways is on the Idaho Transportation Department, and county sheriffs do not have a duty to remove or warn of rocks on state highways; thus, summary judgment was properly granted in a negligence action brought against a sheriff. Udy v. Custer County, 136 Idaho 386, 34 P.3d 1069 (2001).

Statutory Duties.

An administrative agency may not alter, modify or diminish its statutorily-imposed responsibilities, either unilaterally or through agreement with another public or private entity, absent legislative authority to do so; thus, the fact that the county highway district had assumed part of the DOT’s legal obligations might affect the rights and liabilities between the department and the county highway district; however, such an agreement between these two entities did not alter the statutory duty owed by the department to the plaintiff involved in a car wreck. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

The DOT alone has an express statutory duty with respect to erecting and maintaining signs at its highways’ intersections; the legislature in no way qualified this duty by the condition that the sign-placing or maintenance activities occur exclusively within boundaries of the state highway system; thus, contrary to the department’s position that it was without “jurisdiction” to place and maintain signs outside of its right-of-way, the department had both the authority and an express statutory duty to do so. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

District court erred in upholding the validity of a joint powers agreement (JPA) between a city and a highway district, because, while the parties were authorized to enter into the JPA to share the duties and to share the cost of carrying out those duties, the JPA illegally purported to divest the district of the duties to improve and maintain the city street system, or even to supervise those endeavors, while transferring full authority to the city to exercise full control over the city streets, along with its share of ad valorem property tax revenues. City of Sandpoint v. Indep. Highway Dist., 161 Idaho 121, 384 P.3d 368 (2016).

Cited

Taggart v. Highway Bd., 115 Idaho 816, 771 P.2d 37 (1988).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-202. Designation of highways and public rights-of-way.

  1. The initial selection of the county highway system and highway district system may be accomplished in the following manner:
    1. The board of county or highway district commissioners shall cause a map to be prepared showing the general location of each highway and public right-of-way in its jurisdiction, and the commissioners shall cause notice to be given of intention to adopt the map as the official map of that system, and shall specify the time and place at which all interested persons may be heard.
    2. After the hearing, the commissioners shall adopt the map, with any changes or revisions considered by them to be advisable in the public interest, as the official map of the respective highway system.
  2. If a county or highway district acquires an interest in real property for highway or public right-of-way purposes, the respective commissioners shall:
    1. Cause any order or resolution enacted, and deed or other document establishing an interest in the property for their highway system purposes to be recorded in the county records; or
    2. Cause the official map of the county or highway district system to be amended as affected by the acceptance of the highway or public right-of-way.
  3. Highways laid out, recorded and opened as described in subsection (2) of this section, by order of a board of commissioners, and all highways used for a period of five (5) years, provided they shall have been worked and kept up at the expense of the public, or located and recorded by order of a board of commissioners, are highways. If a highway created in accordance with the provisions of this subsection is not opened as described in subsection (2) of this section, there shall be no duty to maintain that highway, nor shall there be any liability for any injury or damage for failure to maintain it or any highway signs, until the highway is designated as a part of the county or highway district system and opened to public travel as a highway.
  4. When a public right-of-way is created in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section, or section 40-203 or 40-203A, Idaho Code, there shall be no duty to maintain that public right-of-way, nor shall there be any liability for any injury or damage for failure to maintain it or any highway signs.
  5. Nothing in this section shall limit the power of any board of commissioners to subsequently include or exclude any highway or public right-of-way from the county or highway district system.
  6. By July 1, 2005, and at least every five (5) years thereafter, the board of county or highway district commissioners shall publish in map form and make readily available a map showing the general location of all highways and public rights-of-way under its jurisdiction. Any board of county or highway district commissioners may be granted an extension of time with approval of the legislature by adoption of a concurrent resolution.
  7. Prior to designating a new highway or public right-of-way on the official map, the board of county or highway district commissioners shall confirm that no legal abandonment has occurred on the new highway or right-of-way to be added to the official map. In addition, the board of county or highway district commissioners shall have some basis indicating dedication, purchase, prescriptive use or other means for the creation of a highway and public right-of-way with evidentiary support.
  8. The board of county or highway district commissioners shall give advance notice of hearing, by U.S. mail, to any landowner upon or within whose land the highway or public right-of-way is located whenever a highway or public right-of-way is proposed for inclusion on such map and the public status of such highway or public right-of-way is not already a matter of public record. The purpose of this official map is to put the public on notice of those highways and public rights-of-way that the board of county or highway district commissioners considers to be public. The inclusion or exclusion of a highway or public right-of-way from such a map does not, in itself, constitute a legal determination of the public status of such highway or public right-of-way. Any person may challenge, at any time, the inclusion or exclusion of a highway or public right-of-way from such map by initiating proceedings as described in section 40-208(7), Idaho Code.
  9. Nothing in this section or in any designation of the general location of a highway or public right-of-way shall authorize the public highway agency to assert or claim rights superior to or in conflict with any rights-of-way that resulted from the creation of a facility for the transmission of water which existed before the designation of the location of a highway or public right-of-way.

Provided, however, a county with highway jurisdiction or highway district may hold title to an interest in real property for public right-of-way purposes without incurring an obligation to construct or maintain a highway within the right-of-way until the county or highway district determines that the necessities of public travel justify opening a highway within the right-of-way. The lack of an opening shall not constitute an abandonment, and mere use by the public shall not constitute an opening of the public right-of-way.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-202, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 206, § 2, p. 512; am. 1988, ch. 184, § 2, p. 322; am. 1992, ch. 55, § 1, p. 160; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 3, p. 1505; am. 1995, ch. 121, § 1, p. 522; am. 1998, ch. 184, § 1, p. 673; am. 2000, ch. 251, § 1, p. 709; am. 2013, ch. 239, § 3, p. 560.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-202 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-201.

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 239, substituted “its jurisdiction” for “their jurisdiction” in paragraph (1)(a); in subsection (6), inserted “at least” near the beginning and “highways and” near the end of the first sentence; inserted subsections (7) and (8); and redesignated former subsection (7) as subsection (9).

Legislative Intent.
Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1988, ch. 184 declared an emergency. Approved March 22, 1988.

Section 5 of S.L. 2000, ch. 251 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

Section 7 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 2013.

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality.

This section was not unconstitutional on its face; if a landowner believed the acquisition of a roadway pursuant to this section resulted in a taking, the landowner had four years from the accrual of the cause of action to bring a claim of inverse condemnation,§ 5-224; the property owner failed to bring an inverse condemnation claim. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Total Success Invs., LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 179 P.3d 323 (2008).

Determination that a road was a public highway by prescription did not violate the owners’ rights to procedural and substantive due process or result in an unconstitutional taking. The owners were put on notice by the public use of the road and had a hearing; there was a rational basis for the application of§ 40-2312 to fix the width of the right-of-way; and an inverse condemnation claim was time-barred under§ 5-224. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011).

Determinative Issues.

The main factual issues subsumed by the question of whether a road may be declared a public roadway are the frequency, nature and quality of the public’s use and maintenance of the road and the intentions of the landowners and county relevant to the use and maintenance. Roberts v. Swim, 117 Idaho 9, 784 P.2d 339 (Ct. App. 1989).

Due Process.

Property owner was afforded due process because it had notice and opportunity to be heard by virtue of this section, the Ada County highway district’s filing of an action to quiet title, and the subsequent trial. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Total Success Invs., LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 179 P.3d 323 (2008).

Evidence.

Objective manifestations of intent to create a public highway include designating the road as a public highway by the proper public authorities; recording the road as a public highway by order of the board of county commissioners; and the regular maintenance of the road by public expenditure. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

Where the only objective manifestation of the county’s intention relevant to the road was the county’s road work, the work performed by the county road crews in improving the road 900 feet into the landowner’s property was merely to assist the landowners in moving their mobile home onto the property, and the snow plowing was done as a gratuitous aid while the mobile home was occupied, the county’s maintenance was not sufficient under this section to support the conclusion that the road had become a public highway. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

Commissioners, who had designated roads that ran across private land as public, erred by placing the roadways on an official map as public, and then requiring the landowners to initiate proceeding to vacate the decision. The commissioners were required to prove the public status of the disputed roads. Homestead Farms, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 141 Idaho 855, 119 P.3d 630 (2005).

Highways by Prescription.

A sufficient showing of public use under this section must demonstrate that the public has used the road regularly, as it would any similar public highway, and that public funds were used to maintain the road for a five-year period; the maintenance being more than occasional or sporadic, but as was necessary. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

A public road may be acquired by prescription: (1) if the public uses the road for a period of five years, and (2) the road is worked and kept up at the expense of the public. Lattin v. Adams County, 149 Idaho 497, 236 P.3d 1257 (2010).

Legal Status of Road.

Although§§ 40-203A and 40-1310 contemplate a validation proceeding and action by the highway district, in a suit asserting tort and constitutional claims the district court could determine that a road was a public highway by prescription, and evidence of long-term public use and public maintenance supported that finding. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011). Legal Status of Road.

This section may be used by counties or by private parties to obtain a declaration that a road is a public highway, either to foreclose private parties from obstructing the road or to confirm the county’s duty to maintain the road. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

Maintenance.

The maintenance of a road need only consist of work and repairs that are reasonably necessary; it need not be performed in each of five consecutive years nor through the entire length of the road. Roberts v. Swim, 117 Idaho 9, 784 P.2d 339 (Ct. App. 1989).

Maintenance of a roadway by a public agency under an express contract, which exchanges such maintenance for limited public access while recognizing the private character of the road, creates no public rights in the roadway beyond those granted by the agreement. Roberts v. Swim, 117 Idaho 9, 784 P.2d 339 (Ct. App. 1989).

Public Access.

The necessity of public access is not germane to the determination of public road status under this section. Roberts v. Swim, 117 Idaho 9, 784 P.2d 339 (Ct. App. 1989).

Public Use.

To show public use under this section, the facts must demonstrate that minor maintenance work or snow removal, done by the public road crews, was not a mere gratuitous aid to the local landowners or citizens; likewise, it must be shown that the public agency has not expressly agreed to maintain the roadway while continuing to recognize it as private, in exchange for certain, limited public use, thereby not intending to create or assert rights greater than those allowed in the agreement. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

The primary factual questions in determining whether a road can be declared a public highway are the frequency, nature and quality of the public’s use and maintenance. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

To show public use under this section, it must be demonstrated that the public’s use of the road was not merely the result of permission given by the owner, as opposed to acquiescence of the owner. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

The expenditures of forest service money on a road abandoned by the county were not at the expense of the public within this section; therefore, the forest service rights were private and did not qualify the road as a “public” or “county” road. French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988), overruled on other grounds, Cardenas v. Kurpjuweit, 116 Idaho 739, 779 P.2d 414 (1989).

Regular maintenance and extensive public use are sufficient to establish the existence of the public status of a roadway. Roberts v. Swim, 117 Idaho 9, 784 P.2d 339 (Ct. App. 1989).

Public Use and Maintenance.

Given that subsection (3) does not require that the public’s use be hostile to the landowner’s use, the trial court erred, as a matter of law, when it imposed a hostility requirement not found in the statute. Whether the use of a portion of a road and a boat ramp was permissive was irrelevant to the applicability of the statute. E. Side Highway Dist. v. Delavan, — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2019 Ida. LEXIS 222 (Dec. 11, 2019). Public Use and Maintenance.

The use and maintenance of a road by a public entity must be something more than occasional or sporadic to change the character from private to public. Rice v. Miniver, 112 Idaho 1069, 739 P.2d 368 (1987).

Under liberal pleading standards, the plaintiff’s complaint was adequate to raise a claim that the road had become a country road through public use and county maintenance. The complaint was very general and did not specifically allege any of the three manners of creation of public roads specified in this section. Although the plaintiff’s complaint lacked desirable detail and specificity, it was sufficient to encompass a claim that the road was rendered a public highway through public use and county maintenance for a period of more than five years. John W. Brown Properties v. Blaine County, 129 Idaho 740, 932 P.2d 368 (Ct. App. 1997).

District court’s finding of regular maintenance and public use of the disputed strip was supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record; the evidence revealed that the strip was used frequently by adjacent landowners and individuals accessing the businesses of the adjacent landowners and, therefore, supported a conclusion of extensive public use, and the road had been maintained by the Ada County highway district as necessary since 1978. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Total Success Invs., LLC, 145 Idaho 360, 179 P.3d 323 (2008).

Cited

Taggart v. Highway Bd., 115 Idaho 816, 771 P.2d 37 (1988); Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Abandonment.
Adverse Possession Against State.

Mere nonuse of a portion of the total width of the highway over a period of years did not constitute an abandonment; therefore defendants were estopped from claiming right and title due to occupation and use of land upon which obstruction stood without interruption for 30 years in spite of the fact that the area in dispute had not been used for highway purposes or kept up or maintained at public expense. Rich v. Burdick, 83 Idaho 335, 362 P.2d 1088 (1961). Adverse Possession Against State.

Possession or use of an unused portion of a highway by an abutting owner was not adverse to the public and could not ripen into a right or title by lapse of time no matter how long continued. Rich v. Burdick, 83 Idaho 335, 362 P.2d 1088 (1961).

Burden of Proof.

Burden was on petitioner to show existence of public road. He had to show that it had been laid out and recorded as highway by board of commissioners, or that it had been used as such for five (5) years. Ross v. Swearingen, 39 Idaho 35, 225 P. 1021 (1924).

Easements.

In suit to establish both a public and private roadway, after abandonment of claim of existence of public highway, evidence of use of old log road or “tote” was held insufficient to establish an easement of necessity. Carbon v. Moon, 68 Idaho 385, 195 P.2d 351 (1948).

The finding of the trial court that a road was a public easement was unsupported by any evidence and, therefore, was clearly erroneous, where the road had been paved and maintained by the city since 1973, but the action was commenced in May of 1977. Aztec Ltd. v. Creekside Inv. Co., 100 Idaho 566, 602 P.2d 64 (1979).

Evidence.

A map prepared by the county surveyor showing the roads and their classification in Gem County and the general geographical location of the road in question while not recorded as a county road map of Gem County was properly admitted in evidence to establish the road which was obstructed by appellant as a prescriptive public road. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

Grant by Federal Government.

Where, prior to defendant’s predecessor taking title to the land, a grant was made by the federal government of a width of 165 feet across the public domain for the establishment of a highway, the title was subject to the grant and to the highway right of way as it had been laid out and recorded prior to the homestead entry. Rich v. Burdick, 83 Idaho 335, 362 P.2d 1088 (1961).

Highways by Prescription.

Highway by prescription exists by virtue of user and not on the theory of a grant or dedication. Thus it may be acquired over open and uninclosed land although owner has no desire to use land over which same runs. Gross v. McNutt, 4 Idaho 286, 38 P. 935 (1894).

Road could not have been deemed a public highway by user where it was constructed and kept in repair by private landowner who maintained gate across the same. Palmer v. Northern Pac. R.R., 11 Idaho 583, 83 P. 947 (1905).

Public use of highway for the statutory period and the keeping of it in repair at public expense established a highway by prescription, whether road is recorded or not. Meservey v. Gulliford, 14 Idaho 133, 93 P. 780 (1908).

Where a landowner fences his land and leaves a tract 50 feet wide outside of his fence for public road, and public travels such road for five years or more, public has acquired a prescriptive right thereto and owner may not obstruct said road. State v. Berg, 28 Idaho 724, 155 P. 968 (1916). Where there had been little travel over any part of a road and little work done by way of maintaining it and a portion thereof, although maintained, was not in the condition for ordinary vehicular traffic, the court was justified in refusing to find that a road had been established by prescription. Kootenai County v. Kinman, 56 Idaho 1, 47 P.2d 887 (1935).

Where there were no positive acts on the part of public authorities manifesting an intention to accept a trail as a public highway, a casual use by the public was insufficient to establish a highway. Kirk v. Schultz, 63 Idaho 278, 119 P.2d 266 (1941).

Roads were public highways where one road was used in excess of five years prior to 1893, and other road was duly recorded in 1916 and thereafter was used by the public for 35 years, and work was performed thereon at public expense. Kosanke v. Kopp, 74 Idaho 302, 261 P.2d 815 (1953).

Where the public used a highway or road for the statutory period of five years and it was worked and kept up at public expense, a highway was established by prescription and recording of it as such by the board of county commissioners was not necessary. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

The uninterrupted and continuous use of a roadway for more than the prescriptive period while generally creating the presumption that the use is hostile did not in Idaho give rise to an irrefutable or conclusive presumption, since one claiming an easement by prescription over wild lands by mere use was not granted the presumption of adverse user. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962).

When a right-of-way has been used by the general public for a period of five years and has been maintained at public expense, the right-of-way became a public highway. State ex rel. Haman v. Fox, 100 Idaho 140, 594 P.2d 1093 (1979).

Where in an action by plaintiff residents of an unincorporated area of a county to have certain roads declared public highways and to require the county to maintain the roads, the evidence showed that the county had regularly maintained the roads for approximately nine years, that the roads had been extensively used by the general public, and that the sales of several lots within the area had been made with particular reliance upon several written representations made by various members of the board of county commissioners that the roads would be maintained by the county, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the county because a substantial fact issue existed as to whether the county had accepted the roads. Pugmire v. Johnson, 102 Idaho 882, 643 P.2d 832 (1982).

It was not necessary that roads be laid out and recorded as highways before they could become public roads; all that was necessary was that the roads have been used by the public for five years or longer and that they have been worked and kept up at public expense. Cordwell v. Smith, 105 Idaho 71, 665 P.2d 1081 (Ct. App. 1983).

Immunity from Suit.
Legal Status of Road.

Where the commissioners acted according to a reasonable interpretation of former similar law when they issued a declaration that a road was public, and such law had no provision which required notice to the affected landowner before the county attempted to enforce their decision, the commissioners were entitled to qualified good-faith immunity from suit for damages since the law was not clearly established at the time of their actions. Evers v. County of Custer, 745 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1984). Legal Status of Road.

While a road became public by public use and maintenance over a five-year period, this declaration did not determine the legal status of the road. Evers v. County of Custer, 745 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1984).

Manner of Dedication.

Under former law regarding recorded and worked highways roads might have been laid out and recorded as highways by order of the board of commissioners, and all roads used as such for a period of five years, provided the latter should have been worked and kept up at the expense of the public or located and recorded by order of the board of commissioners, are highways. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

It is not necessary that highway be worked throughout its entire length at public expense to become a highway by prescription; it need not be worked at places where there is no necessity for working it. Gross v. McNutt, 4 Idaho 286, 38 P. 935 (1894); State v. Berg, 28 Idaho 724, 155 P. 968 (1916).

Where there was evidence of use, but none that road was “laid out and recorded” or “worked and kept up at expense of public,” court was right in concluding it was not public road. Ross v. Swearingen, 39 Idaho 35, 225 P. 1021 (1924); Oregon S.L.R.R. v. Caldwell, 39 Idaho 71, 226 P. 175 (1924).

It was not required that a prescriptive road be worked on for five consecutive years nor did former law require work to be done throughout the road’s entire length, but only required that such work as may be needed be done when necessary for the statutory period, in order to acquire a road by prescription. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

Oral Dedication.

When properly established by evidence, an oral dedication was valid and binding upon the person making it when duly accepted by the public. Thiessen v. Lewiston, 26 Idaho 505, 144 P. 548 (1914).

Partial Acceptance of Oral Dedication.

User was a sufficient acceptance of an oral dedication for road purposes, but if the public sees fit to use only a portion of the land dedicated to it, and the person making such dedication acquiesces in such partial acceptance thereof, the dedication was complete and irrevocable as to the part of the land accepted and the unoccupied part was not affected by the unaccepted offer to dedicate it. Thiessen v. Lewiston, 26 Idaho 505, 144 P. 548 (1914).

Plat Dedicating Street.

A dedication was complete when a plat was filed showing streets and alleys thereon and sales were made with reference thereto, and such dedication was irrevocable, and did not require an acceptance on the part of the city. Boise City v. Hon, 14 Idaho 272, 94 P. 167 (1908).

Public County Road Adjacent.
Public Use.

The public maintenance of a county road did not cause every lane or road that touches or crosses the county road to become a public one, access alone to the county road not being sufficient to make it a public highway. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962). Public Use.

Where gates were in existence across a road barring the passage and making it necessary to open them in order to use the road, the existence of such gates was considered as strong evidence that the road was not a public road. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962).

The facts that the road had not been used for five years by the public, was maintained at the expense of the respondent and that the gates were kept closed, the road only being used by the public with the consent and permission of the respondent, supported the finding of the court that the road did not meet the requirements of former law regarding recorded and worked highways to be classified as a highway. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962).

A road which has not been laid out and recorded as a highway by order of the board of county commissioners, nor been worked and kept up at public expense, cannot be classified as a highway; therefore, property owners were entitled to injunctive relief to prevent its use by others. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962).

The evidence was sufficient to justify the court in concluding that the road was not a public road but that it was one over which people had traveled at will but on which landowners through whose lands it extended had felt at liberty for many years to maintain and had maintained gates. Cox v. Cox, 84 Idaho 513, 373 P.2d 929 (1962).

Recognition of Private Ownership.

Where the public agency expending funds on a roadway expressly recognized the private character of the road, and did not intend to create or to assert any rights greater than those allowed by the owner of the roadway, law regarding recorded and worked highways did not operate to make the road public. Cordwell v. Smith, 105 Idaho 71, 665 P.2d 1081 (Ct. App. 1983).

Where the state’s use of labor and equipment on a road running across private property was done largely to provide the state with access into the area in the event of forest fires and gave the state more convenient access to its own timber lands in the area, and where the state did not assert any public ownership or control over the road and neither the county nor any other public agency claimed the road to be public, but on the contrary, the state specifically sought and obtained written permission to use the road for its limited purposes and also entered into right-of-way agreements with the landowners, allowing loggers of state-owned timber to use the road, the state never intended to create any greater public right to the road than was granted by the owners and law regarding recorded and worked highways did not apply. Cordwell v. Smith, 105 Idaho 71, 665 P.2d 1081 (Ct. App. 1983).

Use and Maintenance.

In order to qualify under law almost identical to this section, the use and maintenance must have been something more than only casually and desultorily and not regularly used and maintained; regular maintenance and extensive public use are sufficient to establish a public easement by proscription. However, it need not be for five consecutive years nor through the entire length of the road. Tomchak v. Walker, 108 Idaho 446, 700 P.2d 68 (1985).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-203. Abandonment and vacation of county and highway district system highways or public rights-of-way.

  1. A board of county or highway district commissioners, whichever shall have jurisdiction of the highway system, shall use the following procedure to abandon and vacate any highway or public right-of-way in the county or highway district system including those which furnish public access to state and federal public lands and waters:
    1. The commissioners may by resolution declare their intention to abandon and vacate any highway or public right-of-way, or to reclassify a public highway as a public right-of-way, where doing so is in the public interest.
    2. Any resident, or property holder, within a county or highway district system including the state of Idaho, any of its subdivisions, or any agency of the federal government may petition the respective commissioners for abandonment and vacation of any highway or public right-of-way within their highway system. The petitioner shall pay a reasonable fee as determined by the commissioners to cover the cost of the proceedings.
    3. The commissioners shall establish a hearing date or dates on the proposed abandonment and vacation.
    4. The commissioners shall prepare a public notice stating their intention to hold a public hearing to consider the proposed abandonment and vacation of a highway or public right-of-way which shall be made available to the public not later than thirty (30) days prior to any hearing and mailed to any person requesting a copy not more than three (3) working days after any such request.
    5. At least thirty (30) days prior to any hearing scheduled by the commissioners to consider abandonment and vacation of any highway or public right-of-way, the commissioners shall mail notice by United States mail to known owners and operators of an underground facility, as defined in section 55-2202, Idaho Code, that lies within the highway or public right-of-way.
    6. At least thirty (30) days prior to any hearing scheduled by the commissioners to consider abandonment and vacation of any highway or public right-of-way, the commissioners shall mail notice to owners of record of land abutting the portion of the highway or public right-of-way proposed to be abandoned and vacated at their addresses as shown on the county assessor’s tax rolls and shall publish notice of the hearing at least two (2) times if in a weekly newspaper or three (3) times if in a daily newspaper, the last notice to be published at least five (5) days and not more than twenty-one (21) days before the hearing.
    7. At the hearing, the commissioners shall accept all information relating to the proceedings. Any person, including the state of Idaho or any of its subdivisions, or any agency of the federal government, may appear and give testimony for or against abandonment.
    8. After completion of the proceedings and consideration of all related information, the commissioners shall decide whether the abandonment and vacation of the highway or public right-of-way is in the public interest of the highway jurisdiction affected by the abandonment or vacation. The decision whether or not to abandon and vacate the highway or public right-of-way shall be written and shall be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law.
    9. If the commissioners determine that a highway or public right-of-way parcel to be abandoned and vacated in accordance with the provisions of this section has a fair market value of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or more, a charge may be imposed upon the acquiring entity, not in excess of the fair market value of the parcel, as a condition of the abandonment and vacation; provided, however, no such charge shall be imposed on the landowner who originally dedicated such parcel to the public for use as a highway or public right-of-way; and provided further, that if the highway or public right-of-way was originally a federal land right-of-way, said highway or public right-of-way shall revert to a federal land right-of-way.
    10. The commissioners shall cause any order or resolution to be recorded in the county records and the official map of the highway system to be amended as affected by the abandonment and vacation.
    11. From any such decision, a resident or property holder within the county or highway district system, including the state of Idaho or any of its subdivisions or any agency of the federal government, may appeal to the district court of the county in which the highway or public right-of-way is located pursuant to section 40-208, Idaho Code.
  2. No highway or public right-of-way or parts thereof shall be abandoned and vacated so as to leave any real property adjoining the highway or public right-of-way without access to an established highway or public right-of-way. The burden of proof shall be on the impacted property owner to establish this fact.
  3. In the event of abandonment and vacation, rights-of-way or easements shall be reserved for the continued use of existing sewer, gas, water, or similar pipelines and appurtenances, or other underground facilities as defined in section 55-2202, Idaho Code, for ditches or canals and appurtenances, and for electric, telephone and similar lines and appurtenances.
    1. When a county or highway district is to consider the abandonment or vacation of any highway, public street or public right-of-way that was accepted as part of a recorded platted subdivision, such abandonment shall be accomplished pursuant to the provisions of this section. (4)(a) When a county or highway district is to consider the abandonment or vacation of any highway, public street or public right-of-way that was accepted as part of a recorded platted subdivision, such abandonment shall be accomplished pursuant to the provisions of this section.
    2. When a county is to consider the abandonment or vacation of any private right-of-way that was accepted as part of a recorded platted subdivision said abandonment or vacation shall be accomplished pursuant to the provisions of chapter 13, title 50, Idaho Code.
  4. In any proceeding under this section or section 40-203A, Idaho Code, or in any judicial proceeding determining the public status or width of a highway or public right-of-way, a highway or public right-of-way shall be deemed abandoned if the evidence shows:
    1. That said highway or public right-of-way was created solely by a particular type of common law dedication, to wit, a dedication based upon a plat or other document that was not recorded in the official records of an Idaho county;
    2. That said highway or public right-of-way is not located on land owned by the United States or the state of Idaho nor on land entirely surrounded by land owned by the United States or the state of Idaho nor does it provide the only means of access to such public lands; and
      1. That said highway or public right-of-way has not been used by the public and has not been maintained at the expense of the public in at least three (3) years during the previous fifteen (15) years; or (c)(i) That said highway or public right-of-way has not been used by the public and has not been maintained at the expense of the public in at least three (3) years during the previous fifteen (15) years; or
      2. Said highway or right-of-way was never constructed and at least twenty (20) years have elapsed since the common law dedication.
History.

All other highways or public rights-of-way may be abandoned and vacated only upon a formal determination by the commissioners pursuant to this section that retaining the highway or public right-of-way for use by the public is not in the public interest, and such other highways or public rights-of-way may be validated or judicially determined at any time notwithstanding any other provision of law. Provided that any abandonment under this subsection shall be subject to and limited by the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this section. History.

I.C.,§ 40-203, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 206, § 3, p. 512; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 4, p. 803; am. 1992, ch. 323, § 1, p. 958; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 4, p. 1505; am. 1995, ch. 121, § 2, p. 522; am. 2000, ch. 251, § 2, p. 709; am. 2013, ch. 239, § 4, p. 560; am. 2014, ch. 137, § 1, p. 372.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for violation of provision of this title,§ 40-207.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-203 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-201.

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 239, in paragraph (1)(a), substituted “or to reclassify a public highway as a public right-of-way, where doing so is” for “considered no longer to be”; added the last sentence in subsection (2); substituted “shall be reserved” for “may be reserved” near the beginning of subsection (3); deleted former subsections (4) and (5), which read, “(4) A highway abandoned and vacated under the provisions of this section may be reclassified as a public right-of-way. (5) Until abandonment is authorized by the commissioners, public use of the highway or public right-of-way may not be restricted or impeded by encroachment or installation of any obstruction restricting public use, or by the installation of signs or notices that might tend to restrict or prohibit public use. Any person violating the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor”; redesignated former subsection (6) as subsection (4); and added present subsection (5).

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 137, in subsection (4), inserted paragraph (a); inserted the (b) designation; and substituted “a county is to consider” for “a county or highway district desires” and substituted “private right-of-way” for “highway, public street or public right-of-way” in paragraph (b).

Legislative Intent.
Effective Dates.

Section 5 of S.L. 2000, ch. 251 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

Section 7 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 2013.

CASE NOTES

Abandonment.

A public highway must exist before it can be abandoned. Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App.), aff’d, 115 Idaho 114, 765 P.2d 139 (1988).

Where the record did not reflect that the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) followed the statutory procedure to abandon highway where accident occurred killing plaintiff’s son, even though it had not been used by the ITD for more than 30 years, a question of material fact as to whether the ITD properly abandoned such highway existed and trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the ITD. Dachlet v. State, 130 Idaho 204, 938 P.2d 1242 (1997).

District court properly granted a motion for summary judgment under Idaho R. Civ. P. 56(c) in a case involving a dispute over the alleged abandonment of a boundary road where two neighbors and others established that the road had not received any public use or maintenance over the last five years. John W. Brown Props. v. Blaine County, 138 Idaho 171, 59 P.3d 976 (2002).

Where an owner’s affidavits concerning the use and maintenance of a gravel road were general and conclusory, they did not set forth specific facts showing the existence of a genuine issue for trial, as required by Idaho R. Civ. P. 56(e). John W. Brown Props. v. Blaine County, 138 Idaho 171, 59 P.3d 976 (2002).

Abandonment of a gravel road that had no public use or maintenance for five years did not result in landlocked property because the owner of the land was still permitted to use the road for access. John W. Brown Props. v. Blaine County, 138 Idaho 171, 59 P.3d 976 (2002).

Because five years passed with no public use or maintenance on a gravel boundary road, the road ceased to be defined as a public road; the abandonment did not require any formal action by county commissioners. John W. Brown Props. v. Blaine County, 138 Idaho 171, 59 P.3d 976 (2002).

Because the court determined that a road was a public road and not abandoned prior to 1963, the procedures outlined in this section applied to any claims of abandonment between 1963 and 1998, and the trial court erred in finding otherwise. Farrell v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 378, 64 P.3d 304 (2002), overruled on other grounds, City of Osburn v. Randel, 152 Idaho 906, 277 P.3d 353 (2012). Bona fide purchaser for value defense was not available to defendant landowner in an action for injunctive relief to enforce a public right to way, because the defense would constitute an abandonment of a county road in contravention of this section. Trunnell v. Fergel, 153 Idaho 68, 278 P.3d 938 (2012).

Access to Public Lands or Waters.

Lack of public use or maintenance for five years does not automatically terminate the public’s rights with respect to roads furnishing access to public lands or waters. Affirmative action by the county commissioners is required to abandon such roads. Blaine County v. Bryson, 109 Idaho 123, 705 P.2d 1078 (Ct. App. 1985).

Roads that furnish public access to state or federal public lands or waters cannot be obstructed without first petitioning the county commissioners or highway district; the commissioners having jurisdiction must then take some affirmative action before abandonment is complete. French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988), overruled on other grounds, Cardenas v. Kurpjuweit, 116 Idaho 739, 779 P.2d 414 (1989).

Private landowners, by obstructing public access to public lands or waters, act at their peril unless the detailed requirements of the statutes are satisfied strictly. French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988), overruled on other grounds, Cardenas v. Kurpjuweit, 116 Idaho 739, 779 P.2d 414 (1989).

Where property owner filed the action after a neighbor sought to block property owner’s use of the road by erecting a barricade and the highway district denied any relief to property owner, decision of the district court that the road was public and not abandoned as a public road by the highway district was correct; the road was not abandoned since, according to the requirements of the section prior to the 1986 amendment, the road was not established by prescription but rather by formal action of the then governing entity and the evidence indicated continued usage of the road to the present time, and since the highway district did not initiate any formal proceedings in conformance with the amended statute to withdraw the road in question from its highway district system. Taggart v. Highway Bd., 115 Idaho 816, 771 P.2d 37 (1988).

Validation of Public Right-of-Way.

Because the highway district’s board of commissioners did not make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding either the existence of the old road prior to 1968 or its subsequent alleged abandonment under former§ 40-104, the board’s order validating public right-of-way over road was vacated. Galvin v. Canyon Hwy. Dist. No. 4, 134 Idaho 576, 6 P.3d 826 (2000).

Cited

Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002); Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497 (2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Abandonment.

Where there was a valid common law dedication of a road, the fact that such road had not been worked or used for a period of five years did not constitute an abandonment thereof merely by virtue of former§ 40-104 (repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1). Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Yacht Club of Coeur d’Alene, Ltd., 116 Idaho 219, 775 P.2d 111 (1989).

A highway district, acting through its commissioners, has the power to abandon public highways following a public hearing. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Yacht Club of Coeur d’Alene, Ltd., 116 Idaho 219, 775 P.2d 111 (1989).

Easement Vested in Public.

When a highway or road was once established by prescription, such establishment vested in the public an easement in, or right to use, the land over which the road runs for highway purposes; and the public could not be divested of this right save by vacation or abandonment of the highway in the manner prescribed by law. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

Where an easement for a road was acquired prior to the time the patent was issued, the owner of the land took the title subject to such easement. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

Instructions.

A requested instruction to the effect that the maintenance of gates on some portions of a road was strong evidence it was not a public road was properly refused inasmuch as the road having been established by prescription could only cease to be a public road by abandonment as provided by law. State v. Nesbitt, 79 Idaho 1, 310 P.2d 787 (1957).

Obstructions.

Where an oral dedication of land for road purposes had been accepted, in part, by the public by user, the public took an easement over the land for the full width agreed upon by the dedication and accepted by the public and no obstructions placed in said road would work a forfeiture of the easement however long they might be suffered to remain there. Thiessen v. Lewiston, 26 Idaho 505, 144 P. 548 (1914).

Period of Nonuse.

Where the trial court found that no public funds were expended for maintenance at any time of the alleged highway over the plaintiff’s land, and where it was further found that a washout occurred between 1928 and 1943, and that such damage was never repaired, there was substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court’s finding of nonuse and nonwork prior to 1963 for the required five year period. Elder v. Northwest Timber Co., 101 Idaho 356, 613 P.2d 367 (1980).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-203A. Validation of county or highway district system highway or public right-of-way.

  1. Any resident or property holder within a county or highway district system, including the state of Idaho or any of its subdivisions, or any agency of the federal government, may petition the board of county or highway district commissioners, whichever shall have jurisdiction of the highway system, to initiate public proceedings to validate a highway or public right-of-way, including those which furnish public access to state and federal public lands and waters, provided that the petitioner shall pay a reasonable fee as determined by the commissioners to cover the cost of the proceedings, or the commissioners may initiate validation proceedings on their own resolution, if any of the following conditions exist:
    1. If, through omission or defect, doubt exists as to the legal establishment or evidence of establishment of a highway or public right-of-way;
    2. If the location of the highway or public right-of-way cannot be accurately determined due to numerous alterations of the highway or public right-of-way, a defective survey of the highway, public right-of-way or adjacent property, or loss or destruction of the original survey of the highways or public rights-of-way; or
    3. If the highway or public right-of-way as traveled and used does not generally conform to the location of a highway or public right-of-way described on the official highway system map or in the public records.
  2. If proceedings for validation of a highway or public right-of-way are initiated, the commissioners shall follow the procedure set forth in section 40-203, Idaho Code, and shall:
    1. If the commissioners determine it is necessary, cause the highway or public right-of-way to be surveyed;
    2. Cause a report to be prepared, including consideration of any survey and any other information required by the commissioners;
    3. Establish a hearing date on the proceedings for validation;
    4. Cause notice of the proceedings to be provided in the same manner as for abandonment and vacation proceedings; and
    5. At the hearing, the commissioners shall consider all information relating to the proceedings and shall accept testimony from persons having an interest in the proposed validation.
  3. Upon completion of the proceedings, the commissioners shall determine whether validation of the highway or public right-of-way is in the public interest and shall enter an order validating the highway or public right-of-way as public or declaring it not to be public.
  4. From any such decision, any resident or property holder within a county or highway district system, including the state of Idaho or any of its subdivisions, or any agency of the federal government, may appeal to the district court of the county in which the highway or public right-of-way is located pursuant to section 40-208, Idaho Code.
  5. When a board of commissioners validates a highway or public right-of-way, it shall cause the order validating the highway or public right-of-way, and if surveyed, cause the survey to be recorded in the county records and shall amend the official highway system map of the respective county or highway district.
  6. The commissioners shall proceed to determine and provide just compensation for the removal of any structure that, prior to creation of the highway or public right-of-way, encroached upon a highway or public right-of-way that is the subject of a validation proceeding, or if such is not practical, the commissioners may acquire property to alter the highway or public right-of-way being validated.
  7. This section does not apply to the validation of any highway, public street or public right-of-way which is to be accepted as part of a platted subdivision pursuant to chapter 13, title 50, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-203A, as added by 1986, ch. 206, § 4, p. 512; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 5, p. 1505; am. 1995, ch. 121, § 3, p. 522; am. 2000, ch. 251, § 3, p. 709.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 5 of S.L. 2000, ch. 251 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

CASE NOTES

Application.

This section may only be used to validate an existing highway or public right-of-way about which there is some kind of doubt; it does not allow for the creation of new public rights. Galvin v. Canyon Hwy. Dist. No. 4, 134 Idaho 576, 6 P.3d 826 (2000).

County board of commissioners correctly determined that it was in the public interest for the road to be a public highway; there was substantial evidence supporting this finding as the road became public while the underlying land was federal property and a number of people testified that they regularly used the road to access the national forest. Sopatyk v. Lemhi County, 151 Idaho 809, 264 P.3d 916 (2011).

Findings of Fact.

Because the highway district’s board of commissioners did not make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding either the existence of the old road prior to 1968 or its subsequent alleged abandonment under former§ 40-104, the board’s order validating public right-of-way was vacated. Galvin v. Canyon Hwy. Dist. No. 4, 134 Idaho 576, 6 P.3d 826 (2000).

Power of Court.
Cited

Although this section and§ 40-1310 contemplate a validation proceeding and action by the highway district, the district court had power to determine, in a suit asserting tort and constitutional claims, that a road was a public highway by prescription under§ 40-202(3). Evidence of long-term public use and public maintenance supported that finding. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011). Cited Cobbley v. City of Challis, 143 Idaho 130, 139 P.3d 732 (2006).

§ 40-203B. Abandonment or assuming control of a highway.

Whenever the Idaho transportation department is either planning to abandon any section or all of a state highway to a county, a city or a highway district or assume control of a section or all of a highway which is under the jurisdiction of a county, city or a highway district, the transportation department shall first obtain the consent of the applicable local highway jurisdiction before it may abandon or assume control of the highway. Consent shall be obtained by passage of a resolution by the local highway jurisdiction assenting to the proposed action of the transportation department. Prior to consenting to an abandonment or assumption of the applicable highway, the local highway jurisdiction may conduct a public hearing and also provide notice to any impacted property owners, businesses, industries and enterprises. If consent is not obtained as provided in this section, the action by the transportation department regarding the abandonment of a state highway or assumption of control of a local jurisdiction highway shall be null, void, and of no force and effect.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-203B, as added by 1990, ch. 60, § 1, p. 136; am. 2013, ch. 141, § 2, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 141, inserted the next-to-last sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1990, ch. 60 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 1990.

CASE NOTES

Abandonment.

Where the record did not reflect that the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) followed the statutory procedure to abandon highway where accident occurred killing plaintiff’s son, even though it had not been used by the ITD for more than 30 years, a question of material fact as to whether the ITD properly abandoned such highway existed and trial court’s erred in granting summary judgment for the ITD. Dachlet v. State, 130 Idaho 204, 938 P.2d 1242 (1997).

§ 40-204. Assent to federal acts.

  1. The state of Idaho renews its assent to the provisions of the act of congress approved July 11, 1916, entitled, “An act to provide that the United States shall aid the states in the construction of rural post roads, and for other purposes” (39th United States Statutes at Large, page 355), and its amendments or acts supplementary to it, and accepts the provisions and benefits of any act of congress enacted having for its purpose the construction, improvement and maintenance of public roads or highways in the state of Idaho.
  2. The state of Idaho renews its assent to the provisions of the act of congress approved October 22, 1965, entitled, “An act to provide for scenic development and road beautification of the federal-aid highway systems” (Public Law 89-285), and its amendments, or acts supplementary to it and accepts the provisions and benefits of any act of congress enacted having for its purpose the control of outdoor advertising, and junkyards adjacent to highways, or the landscaping and scenic enhancement of highways in the state of Idaho.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-204, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

The act of congress approved July 11, 1916, 39 Statutes At Large 355, referred to in subsection (1), was repealed by P.L. 85-767, Act Aug. 27, 1958. A similar provision is currently compiled as 23 USCS § 121(c).

The act of congress approved October 22, 1965, P.L. 89-285, referred to in subsection (2), is compiled as 23 USCS §§ 101 (also notes preceding § 101), 131, 131, notes, 135, 136, note, and 319.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 40-204A. Federal land rights-of-way.

  1. The state recognizes that the act of construction and first use constitute the acceptance of the grant given to the public for federal land rights-of-way, and that once acceptance of the grant has been established, the grant shall be for the perpetual term granted by the congress of the United States.
  2. The only method for the abandonment of these rights-of-way shall be that of eminent domain proceedings in which the taking of the public’s right to access shall be justly compensated. Neither the mere passage of time nor the frequency of use shall be considered a justification for considering these rights-of-way to have been abandoned.
  3. All of the said rights-of-way shall be shown by some form of documentation to have existed prior to the withdrawal of the federal grant in 1976 or to predate the removal of land through which they transit from the public domain for other public purposes. Documentation may take the form of a map, an affidavit, surveys, books or other historic information.
  4. These rights-of-way shall not require maintenance for the passage of vehicular traffic, nor shall any liability be incurred for injury or damage through a failure to maintain the access or to maintain any highway sign. These rights-of-way shall be traveled at the risk of the user and may be maintained by the public through usage by the public.
  5. Any member of the public, the state of Idaho and any of its political subdivisions, and any agency of the federal government may choose to seek validation of its rights under law to use granted rights-of-way either through a process set forth by the state of Idaho, through processes set forth by any federal agency or by proclamation of user rights granted under the provisions of the original act, Revised Statute 2477.
  6. Persons seeking acknowledgement of federal land rights-of-way shall file with the county recorder the request for acknowledgement and for any supporting documentation. The county recorder shall record acknowledgements, including supporting documentation, and maintain an appropriate index of same.

Persons seeking to have a federal land right-of-way, including those which furnish public access to state and federal public lands and waters, validated as a highway or public right-of-way as part of a county or highway official highway system, shall follow the procedure outlined in section 40-203A, Idaho Code.

Neither the granting of the original right-of-way nor any provision in this or any other state act shall be construed as a relinquishment of either federal ownership or management of the surface estate of the property over which the right-of-way passes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-204A, as added by 1993, ch. 142, § 3, p. 375; am. 2000, ch. 251, § 4, p. 709.

STATUTORY NOTES

Legislative Intent.
Federal References.

Revised statutes 2477, referred to at the end of the first paragraph in subsection (5) and codified as 43 U.S.C. 932, was repealed by P.L. 94-579, effective October 1, 1976.

Effective Dates.

Section 4 of S.L. 1993, ch. 142 declared an emergency. Approved March 25, 1993.

Section 5 of S.L. 2000, ch. 251 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

CASE NOTES

Jurisdiction.

District court erred in dismissing the property owners’ action seeking validation of a road as a United States Revised Statute 2477 (R.S. 2477) right-of-way on federal land, where the county provided no evidence showing that the federal government disputed title to the road and the owners’ historical records presented at least a colorable claim to an R.S. 2477 right-of-way.. Nemeth v. Shoshone Cty., — Idaho —, 453 P.3d 844 (2019).

§ 40-205. Saving clause for acts and suits in process of being carried out.

This act shall not affect any act done, ratified or confirmed, or any right accrued, or established, or any action or proceeding had or commenced in a civil or criminal cause prior to July 1, 1985, and actions or proceedings may be prosecuted and continued by the department, and when required, by the board or the director, as the case may be.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-205, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1985, ch. 253, which is compiled as§§ 21-136, 34-625, 49-448, 49-1011, 50-313, 63-2412, 63-2418, 63-2440 and generally throughout title 40, Idaho Code.

§ 40-206. Publication of notices.

Whenever publication of a notice by a county highway system or highway district is required for an override or bond election, or a hearing, it shall appear in a newspaper printed and published within the district or county, or in some newspaper of general circulation in the county or district, and the notice shall be published as follows:

  1. The publication of notice for an override or bond election shall be published as provided for in section 34-1406, Idaho Code.
  2. The publication of notice for a hearing shall be published at least one (1) time in a weekly newspaper or at least two (2) consecutive times in a daily newspaper and remain the responsibility of the political subdivision proposing such hearing. The last notice shall be published not less than five (5) days prior to the hearing, except as otherwise specifically provided in this title.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-206, as added by 1989, ch. 349, § 2, p. 876; am. 1994, ch. 123, § 1, p. 274; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 71, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-206, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-206, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 5, p. 803, was repealed by S.L. 1989, ch. 349, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in subsection (1), substituted “published as provided for in section 34-1406, Idaho Code” for “published at least three (3) times in a weekly newspaper or at least six (6) consecutive times in a daily newspaper” and deleted the last sentence, which read: “The last notice shall be published not less than five (5) days prior to an override or bond election, except as otherwise specifically provided in this title”; and, in the first sentence in subsection (2), added “and remain the responsibility of the political subdivision proposing such hearing.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-207. Violations — Penalties.

Any person who shall violate or aid in the violation of any of the provisions of this title, unless a different penalty is prescribed by law, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500), or imprisonment for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. All fines collected for violations of the provisions of this title shall be paid into the highway distribution account established in section 40-701, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-207, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-208. Judicial review.

  1. Any resident or property holder within the county or highway district system, including the state of Idaho or any of its subdivisions or any agency of the federal government, who is aggrieved by a final decision of a board of county or highway district commissioners in an abandonment and vacation or validation proceeding is entitled to judicial review under the provisions of this section.
  2. Proceedings for review are instituted by filing a petition in the district court of the county in which the commissioners have jurisdiction over the highway or public right-of-way within twenty-eight (28) days after the filing of the final decision of the commissioners or, if a rehearing is requested, within twenty-eight (28) days after the decision thereon.
  3. The filing of the petition does not itself stay enforcement of the commissioners’ decision. The reviewing court may order a stay upon appropriate terms.
  4. Within thirty (30) days after the service of the petition, or within further time allowed by the court, the commissioners shall transmit to the reviewing court the original or a certified copy of the entire record of the proceeding under review. By stipulation of all parties to the review proceedings, the record may be shortened. A party unreasonably refusing to stipulate to limit the record may be ordered by the court to pay for additional costs. The court may require subsequent corrections to the record and may also require or permit additions to the record.
  5. The parties may present additional evidence to the court, upon a showing to the court that such evidence is material to the issues presented to the court. In such case, the court may order that the additional information be presented to the commissioners upon conditions determined by the court. The commissioners may modify their findings and decisions by reason of the additional information and shall file that information and any modifications, new findings, or decisions with the reviewing court.
  6. Either party to a proceeding may request in writing that a judge who resides outside the county where the subject road or property is located be appointed to hear the case, and, upon such written request, such a judge shall be appointed for the case. The review shall be conducted by the court without a jury. The court shall consider the record before the board of county or highway district commissioners and shall defer to the board of county or highway district commissioners on matters in which such board has appropriately exercised its discretion with respect to the evaluation of the public interest. As to the determination of highway or public right-of-way creation, width and abandonment, the court may accept new evidence and testimony supplemental to the record provided by the county or highway district, and the court shall consider those issues anew. In cases of alleged irregularities in procedure before the commissioners, not shown in the record, proof thereon may be taken in the court. The court, upon request, shall hear oral argument and receive written briefs.
History.

(7) Any person other than a board of county or highway district commissioners seeking a determination of the legal status or the width of a highway or public right-of-way shall first petition for the initiation of validation or abandonment proceedings, or both, as provided for in sections 40-203(1)(b) and 40-203A(1), Idaho Code. If the commissioners having jurisdiction over the highway system do not initiate a proceeding in response to such a petition within thirty (30) days, the person may seek a determination by quiet title or other available judicial means. When the legal status or width of a highway or public right-of-way is disputed and where a board of county or highway district commissioners wishes to determine the legal status or width of a highway or public right-of-way, the commissioners shall initiate validation or abandonment proceedings, or both, as provided for in sections 40-203 and 40-203A, Idaho Code, rather than initiating an action for quiet title. If proceedings pursuant to the provisions of section 40-203 or 40-203A, Idaho Code, are initiated, those proceedings and any appeal or remand therefrom shall provide the exclusive basis for determining the status and width of the highway, and no court shall have jurisdiction to determine the status or width of said highway except by way of judicial review provided for in this section. Provided that nothing in this subsection shall preclude determination of the legal status or width of a public road in the course of an eminent domain proceeding, as provided for in chapter 7, title 7, Idaho Code. History.

I.C.,§ 40-208, as added by 1993, ch. 412, § 6, p. 1505; am. 2013, ch. 239, § 5, p. 560; am. 2016, ch. 358, § 1, p. 1051.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 239, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 358, added the first sentence in subsection (6).

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 provides: “Legislative Intent. It is the intent of the Legislature to address right-of-way issues brought forward during the testimony and discussion before the Senate Transportation Committee in the 2012 legislative session relating to House Bill No. 628, as amended. During the 2012 interim session, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives established an Interim Task Force encompassing members of the Idaho Senate and the House of Representatives to further study these issues. On October 1, 2012, the Right-of-Way Task Force convened and accepted extensive testimony from stakeholders that included representatives of utility companies, counties and highway districts, irrigation districts and canal companies and various members of the public. It is further the intent of the Legislature to protect private property rights and ensure adequate public rights-of-way for transportation, utility and irrigation and other public facilities. It is the intent of the Legislature that this act shall apply to any and all existing and future highways and public rights-of-way and provide for an immediate implementation date due to the year delay in passing needed legislation, as a result of the yearlong task force efforts and the immediate need to provide clarity regarding the status or abandonment of highways and public rights-of-way.”

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 2013.

CASE NOTES

Jurisdiction.

District court erred in dismissing the property owners’ action seeking validation of a road as a United States Revised Statute 2477 (R.S. 2477) right-of-way on federal land, where the county provided no evidence showing that the federal government disputed title to the road and the owners’ historical records presented at least a colorable claim to an R.S. 2477 right-of-way. Nemeth v. Shoshone Cty., — Idaho —, 453 P.3d 844 (2019).

Retroactivity.

This section defines the standard of review for an appeal from a commissioner’s decision and is procedural in nature. Therefore, the statute can be applied retroactively and the decision of the district court to review the case de novo was erroneous. Floyd v. Board of Comm’rs, 131 Idaho 234, 953 P.2d 984 (1998).

Separate Proceedings.

A petition for judicial review of a road-validation decision of a local governing board is a distinct form of proceeding and cannot be brought as a pleading or motion within an underlying civil lawsuit. Cobbley v. City of Challis, 143 Idaho 130, 139 P.3d 732 (2006).

Cited

Galvin v. Canyon Hwy. Dist. No. 4, 134 Idaho 576, 6 P.3d 826 (2000); Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002); Homestead Farms, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 141 Idaho 855, 119 P.3d 630 (2005); Galli v. Idaho County, 146 Idaho 155, 191 P.3d 233 (2008).

§ 40-209. Highway right-of-way plats.

  1. A public highway agency may file in the office of the county recorder a highway right-of-way plat. The highway right-of-way plat shall show by outline and identify by parcel number, parcels of land to be acquired and shall be prepared in conformance with sections 55-1905 through 55-1907, Idaho Code. The recording of a highway right-of-way plat as provided in this section shall not excuse a county or highway district from the requirements of abandonment or validation of a public highway or public right-of-way as provided in sections 40-203 and 40-203A, Idaho Code. The highway right-of-way plat shall contain the following:
    1. Project name and number;
    2. The location and monumentation of the points where the right-of-way changes direction by angle point or curvature and its intersection with any public highway, street or trail right-of-way and all witness corners and reference points. All points shall be marked with magnetically detectable monuments conforming to the provisions of section 54-1227, Idaho Code, unless special circumstances preclude use of such monument. Monuments shall be marked such that measurements between them may be made to the nearest one-tenth (0.1) foot;
    3. An outline showing the boundary of each parcel of land to be acquired based on ownership records and the right-of-way location survey;
    4. An identifying parcel number and the area for each parcel of land to be acquired;
    5. Acknowledgement of authorized agent of the public highway agency filing said plat;
    6. Certificate of land surveyor under whose responsible charge the plat is prepared.
  2. The highway right-of-way plat filed with the county recorder of any county shall be assigned an instrument number and shall be bound or filed with other plats of like character in a book on file designated “Highway Right-of-Way Plats.”
  3. Any amendments, alterations, rescissions or changes in a highway right-of-way plat shall comply with subsection (1) of this section and shall be filed in a like manner. The recorder may make suitable notations on the appropriate highway right-of-way plat affected by the amendment, alteration, rescission or change to direct the attention of anyone examining the record to the proper plat.
  4. Highway right-of-way plats filed under this section shall not operate to transfer title to the real property described therein but such plat shall be used for delineation purposes. Acquisition of real property for highway right-of-way by conveyance or judicial decree may refer to said highway right-of-way plat, project number and parcel identification number, together with delineation of the parcel as a valid description of the real property for all purposes.
  5. The agency making the initial filing in a county shall reimburse the county recorder the actual cost of the plat book required in subsection (2) of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-209, as added by 1994, ch. 364, § 2, p. 1139; am. 2011, ch. 136, § 5, p. 383.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 136, in the introductory paragraph in subsection (1), deleted “tracts or” following “parcel number” and substituted “sections 55-1905 through 55-1907” for “chapter 19, title 55”; rewrote paragraph (1)(b), which formerly read: “Monuments found, set, reset, replaced or removed describing their kind, size and location and giving other data relating thereto”; rewrote paragraph (1)(c), which formerly read: “Bearings, basis of bearings, length of lines, scale of map and north arrow”; rewrote paragraph (1)(d), which formerly read: “Section, or part of section, township, range and reference to adjoin plats or surveys of record; and ties to at least two (2) public land surveying corners, or in lieu of public land survey corners, to two (2) monuments recognized by the city engineer or surveyor, or county engineer or surveyor”; and deleted former paragraph (1)(e), which read: “Outline of all parcels of land to be acquired, identifying them with parcel identification numbers” and redesignated the remaining paragraphs accordingly.

§ 40-210. Legislative intent — Utility facilities — Coordinated relocation policies — Definitions.

  1. Public highways are intended principally for public travel and transportation; however, the public highways and the public right-of-way used in connection with the public highways are also lawfully used in connection with uses associated with utility purposes necessary to provide utility services to the public. Without making use of public highways and their associated rights-of-way, the utility facilities and services could not reach or economically serve the residents of the state of Idaho.
  2. In furtherance of the legislative intent expressed in subsection (1) of this section, public highway agencies engaged in a public highway project that may require the relocation of utility facilities, or any private party working with a public highway agency on a project that may require the relocation of utility facilities in connection therewith, shall permit the affected utility to participate in project development meetings. In addition, at the beginning of the preliminary design phase of the project, the public highway agency shall, upon giving written notice of not less than thirty (30) days to the affected utility, meet with the utility for the purpose of allowing the utility to review plans, understand the goals, objectives and funding sources for the proposed project, provide and discuss recommendations to the public highway agency that would reasonably eliminate or minimize utility relocation costs, limit the disruption of utility services, eliminate or reduce the need for present or future utility facility relocation, and provide reasonable schedules to enable coordination of the highway project construction and such utility facility relocation as may be necessary. While recognizing the essential goals and objectives of the public highway agency in proceeding with and completing a project, the parties shall use their best efforts to find ways to (a) eliminate the cost to the utility of relocation of the utility facilities, or (b) if elimination of such costs is not feasible, minimize the relocation costs to the maximum extent reasonably possible.
  3. If a utility has received notice of the preliminary design meeting as set forth in subsection (2) of this section and has failed to respond or participate in meetings described therein, such failure to respond or participate in such meetings shall not in any way affect the ability of the public highway agencies to proceed with the project design or construction.
  4. As used in this section:
    1. “Utility” means an entity comprised of any person, private company, public agency or cooperative owning and/or operating utility facilities.
    2. “Utility facility” means all privately, publicly or cooperatively owned lines, facilities and systems for producing, transmitting or distributing communications, cable television, electricity, light, heat, gas, oil, crude products, ore, water, steam, waste or storm water not connected with highway drainage and other similar commodities.

Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that the public highway agencies and utilities engage in proactive, cooperative coordination of highway projects through a process that will attempt to effectively minimize costs, limit the disruption of utility services, and limit or reduce the need for present or future relocation of such utility facilities.

History.

(5) No provision of this chapter shall diminish or otherwise limit the authority of this state, highway district or other political subdivision having jurisdiction over the public right-of-way. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, abrogate or supersede the provisions of the applicable local ordinance or regulations governing the use of the public right-of-way. History.

I.C.,§ 40-210, as added by 2009, ch. 142, § 1, p. 426.

CASE NOTES

Relocation Costs.

Although the legislature has the authority to order public highway agencies to use their best efforts to minimize the cost of relocating utility facilities within a right-of-way, the Idaho public utilities commission does not have that authority. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Idaho Pub. Utils., 151 Idaho 1, 253 P.3d 675 (2011).

Chapter 3 IDAHO TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Sec.

General

GENERAL

§ 40-301. Idaho transportation board — Creation — Authority.

There is established the Idaho transportation board, which is vested with authority, control, supervision and administration of the department created and established by this title.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-301, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 3 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-301. R.S., § 860; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 787; C.S., § 1307; I.C.A.,§ 39-301; am. 1953, ch. 100, § 1, p. 134.

40-302. 1911, ch. 211, p. 703; reen. C.L., § 878a; C.S., § 1308; I.C.A.,§ 39-302.

40-303. R.S., § 861; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 879; C.S., § 1309; I.C.A.,§ 39-303.

40-304. R.S., § 862; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 880; C.S., § 1310; I.C.A.,§ 39-304.

40-305. R.S., § 863; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 881; C.S., § 1311; I.C.A.,§ 39-305.

40-306. 1945, ch. 86, § 1, p. 134; am. 1947, ch. 103, § 1, p. 209.

40-307. 1945, ch. 86, § 2, p. 134.

40-308. I.C.,§ 40-308, as added by 1961, ch. 79, § 1, p. 108; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 26, p. 61; am. 1984, ch. 251, § 1, p. 603.

§ 40-302. Board — Membership — Appointment — Qualification.

The board shall be composed of seven (7) members to be appointed by the governor. Not more than four (4) members shall at any time belong to the same political party. Members shall be well informed and interested in the construction and maintenance of public highways and highway systems, and their selection and appointment shall be made solely with regard to the best interests of the various functions of the board. At least one (1) member shall have special training, experience or expertise in the field of aeronautical transportation. Each member at the time of his appointment shall have been a citizen, resident and taxpayer of the state of Idaho and of the district from which he is appointed for at least five (5) years. During his tenure of office no member shall hold or occupy any federal, state, county, or municipal elective or other appointive office, or any office in any political party.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-302, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1995, ch. 203, § 1, p. 695.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-302 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

§ 40-303. Creation of districts — Residence of board members — Term of office.

  1. For the purposes of selection of members of the board, the state of Idaho shall be divided into six (6) director districts as follows:
    1. District No. 1. The counties of Benewah, Bonner, Boundary, Kootenai and Shoshone.
    2. District No. 2. The counties of Clearwater, Idaho, Latah, Lewis and Nez Perce.
    3. District No. 3. The counties of Ada, Adams, Boise, Canyon, Elmore, Gem, Owyhee, Payette, Valley and Washington.
    4. District No. 4. The counties of Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding, Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka and Twin Falls.
    5. District No. 5. The counties of Bannock, Bear Lake, Bingham, Caribou, Franklin, Oneida and Power.
    6. District No. 6. The counties of Bonneville, Butte, Clark, Custer, Fremont, Jefferson, Lemhi, Madison and Teton.
  2. Each of the districts shall be represented by one (1) member appointed from that district. A seventh member of the board shall be appointed from the state at large and shall act as chairman of the board. The governor shall appoint all members and the members are subject to confirmation by the senate. The chairman of the board shall serve at the pleasure of the governor for an indefinite period. The terms of office of the members of the board representing the six (6) districts are as follows:
    1. One (1) member shall be appointed from district no. 1 to serve an initial term expiring January 31, 2001, and thereafter the term shall be for six (6) years;
    2. The member of the board from district no. 2 serving on the effective date of this act shall continue in office for the balance of the term to which he was appointed, January 31, 1998, and thereafter the term of office shall be six (6) years;
    3. One (1) member shall be appointed from district no. 3 to serve an initial term expiring January 31, 1997, and thereafter the term of office shall be six (6) years;
    4. The member of the board from district no. 4 serving on the effective date of this act shall continue in office for the balance of the term to which he was appointed, January 31, 2000, and thereafter the term shall be six (6) years;
    5. One (1) member shall be appointed from district no. 5 to serve an initial term expiring January 31, 1999, and thereafter the term shall be for six (6) years; and
    6. The member of the board from district no. 6 serving on the effective date of this act shall continue in office for the balance of the term to which he was appointed, January 31, 1996, and thereafter the term shall be for six (6) years.
History.

The terms of the newly appointed members shall begin immediately upon their appointment and qualification. Each member shall hold office after the expiration of his own term until his successor has been appointed and qualified. Within fifteen (15) days after the expiration of a term, the governor shall appoint a successor and submit that appointment to the senate for confirmation. Should any member of the board resign, die, move from the district from which he was appointed, or be removed from office, the governor shall, within thirty (30) days, appoint a successor with like qualifications to serve for the remainder of the retiring member’s unexpired term. If a vacancy occurs within forty-five (45) days after the convening of the legislature and the legislature is still in session, the governor shall make a nomination to fill the vacancy and submit it to the senate for their approval. History.

I.C.,§ 40-303, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1995, ch. 203, § 2, p. 695.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-303 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this act” in paragraphs (b), (d), and (f) of subsection (2) refers to the effective date of S.L. 1995, ch. 203, which was July 1, 1995.

§ 40-304. Oath of office — Bond.

Each member of the board shall receive a certificate of appointment from the governor, and before entering upon the discharge of his official duties shall file with the secretary of state a declaration of the political party to which the board member belongs, and the member shall also be bonded to the state of Idaho in the time, form and manner prescribed by chapter 8, title 59, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-304, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-304 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

§ 40-305. Removal of board members.

The governor may remove any board member for incompetency, inefficiency, intemperance, misconduct in office, neglect or dereliction of duty. Charges in writing, setting forth fully and concisely the cause and grounds of removal, together with a citation directing the member within fifteen (15) days after the service of the charges and citation to appear and be afforded a public hearing in the office of the governor, shall be effected by delivering a copy of the charges to the member or mailing it by United States registered mail in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, addressed to the member at his last address of record. The appearance may be personal or by answer, and by counsel. Service of the charges and citation shall be complete if delivered personally at the time of delivery, and if mailed at the time of deposit in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to service by mail. A complete transcript of the hearing, including the charges, answers, exhibits and testimony and proceedings, findings, decision and order, shall be made. If the member is removed from office, the completed transcript shall within ten (10) days after the decision be filed with the secretary of state.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-305, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-305 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

§ 40-306. Compensation and reimbursement for expenses.

Each member of the board shall be compensated as provided by section 59-509(i), Idaho Code. The compensation and expenses shall be allowed and paid from the state highway and the state aeronautic’s accounts.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-306, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1995, ch. 203, § 3, p. 695.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State aeronautics fund,§ 21-211.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-306 was repealed. See Prior Law,§ 40-301.

§ 40-307. Office of board — Organization meetings — Officers. — The permanent offices of the board shall be maintained in Ada county, in suitable offices and quarters, with equipment, records and supplies as may be deemed necessary to carry out the provisions of this title. The members of the board shall select a vice chairman at the February meeting of each year, and the board shall adopt a seal having upon it the words, “Idaho Transportation Board

State of Idaho.” The secretary of the board shall have care and custody of the seal. The board shall appoint a secretary and fix his compensation. The secretary shall hold office subject to the pleasure of the board, and carry out administrative duties as delegated to him. For the administration of their functions the board may employ other employees and personnel as may be deemed necessary, prescribe their duties, and fix their compensation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-307, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1995, ch. 203, § 4, p. 695; am. 2001, ch. 183, § 13, p. 613.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-307 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

§ 40-308. Meetings — Quorum.

The board shall hold not less than twelve (12) regular meetings each year, on a day of each month as the board shall determine, unless a legal holiday, then on the next ensuing business day, for the purpose of transacting business as may come before it. The chairman of the board shall preside over all meetings, except that he shall only be permitted to vote in the case of a tie vote. In the absence of the chairman, the vice chairman shall preside over meetings, except that he shall have full voting privileges. Additional regular meetings may be held as the board shall determine in its by-laws, rules and regulations. Special meetings of the board may be called at any time and from time to time by four (4) members of the board, and on the written request of the director, showing the necessity and purpose for a meeting. The board chairman may call a special meeting specifying the time, place and purpose of the meeting. The secretary shall cause due notice to be given to each member, either personally or by telephone, mail or telegraph, of the time, place and purpose of all special and regular meetings, and upon his failure so to do, notice may be given either by the chairman or the four (4) members concurring in calling any meeting. Any meeting of the board at which all of the members are present shall be as valid as if held pursuant to proper notice, and should a meeting be held without notice when all members are not present, if the absent member or members shall have signed a waiver, or shall subsequently sign the minutes of the meeting, it shall be as valid and binding as though called upon due notice. A majority of the members of the board shall constitute a quorum and a majority of all members of the board shall be necessary for the authorization of any act by the board, except as otherwise herein provided.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-308, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1995, ch. 203, § 5, p. 695.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-308 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-301.

§ 40-309. Powers and duties — Vested powers.

The board is vested with the following functions, powers and duties:

  1. To contract fully, in the name of the state of Idaho, with respect to the rights, powers and duties vested in the board by this title.
  2. Sue and be sued in its own name.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-309, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Legal Counsel.

The legislature has delegated to the Idaho board of highway directors (now transportation board) the power to hire legal counsel of its own choosing. Padgett v. Williams, 82 Idaho 28, 348 P.2d 944 (1960).

Powers of Board.

The legislature had delegated to the board of highway directors (now transportation board) in former law the authority to build and maintain highways and to enter into and perform all lawful contracts for that purpose and having appropriated moneys to the board for that purpose and there being money available for the payment of plaintiff foreign corporation’s claim for aerial photography work and the same having been properly approved and certified to the state auditor in proper form and the state auditor having submitted the same to the state board of examiners, that board had no power or authority to withhold its approval of the claim and it was the duty of the state auditor to issue warrant for the payment thereof. Aero Serv. Corp. W. v. Benson, 84 Idaho 416, 374 P.2d 277 (1962).

§ 40-310. Powers and duties — State highway system.

The board shall:

  1. Determine which highways in the state, or sections of highways, shall be designated and accepted for the purpose of this title as a part of the state highway system.
    1. In determining which highways or section of highways shall be a part of the state highway system, the board shall consider the relative importance of each highway to cities, existing business, industry and enterprises and to the development of cities, natural resources, industry and agriculture and be guided by statistics on existing and projected traffic volumes. The board shall also consider the safety and convenience of highway users, the common welfare of the people of the state, and of the cities within the state and the financial capacity of the state of Idaho to acquire rights-of-way and to construct, reconstruct and maintain state highways. In making a determination, the board must, before it can abandon, relocate, or replace by a new highway, any highway serving or traversing any city, or the area in which the city is located, specifically find and determine that the benefits to the state of Idaho are greater than the economic loss and damage to the city affected. No highway serving or traversing any city shall be abandoned, relocated or replaced by a new highway serving the area in which a city is located without the board first holding a public hearing in that city. The abandonment shall proceed as set forth in section 40-203B, Idaho Code.
  2. The board shall cause to be prepared and publicly displayed in a conspicuous place in their offices a complete map of the state highway system in which each section shall be identified by location, length and a control number. The map shall be of a suitable size and scale and contain data and information as deemed appropriate by the board. Periodically, and not less than once each year, the board shall revise and correct the map to record the changes in the designated state highway system resulting from additions, abandonments and relocations. Hand maps of the state highway system shall be issued periodically for public distribution.
  3. Abandon the maintenance of any highway and remove it from the state highway system, when that action is determined by the unanimous consent of the board to be in the public interest.
  4. Locate, design, construct, reconstruct, alter, extend, repair and maintain state highways, and plan, design and develop statewide transportation systems when determined by the board to be in the public interest.
  5. Establish standards for the location, design, construction, reconstruction, alteration, extension, repair and maintenance of state highways, provided that standards of state highways through local highway jurisdictions shall be coordinated with the standards in use for the systems of the respective local highway jurisdictions. The board shall make agreements with local highway jurisdictions having within their limits state highway sections in the category described in section 40-502, Idaho Code, and provide for an equitable division of the maintenance of those sections. The board may also, in the interest of economy and efficiency, arrange to have any or all of the state highway sections within local highway jurisdictions maintained by those local highway jurisdictions, the cost of the work as limited by section 40-502, Idaho Code, to be reimbursed by the state.
  6. Cause to be made and kept, surveys, studies, maps, plans, specifications and estimates for the alteration, extension, repair and maintenance of state highways, and so far as practicable, of all highways in the state, and for that purpose to demand and to receive reports and copies of records from county commissioners, commissioners of highway districts, county engineers and directors of highways and all other highway officials within the state.
  7. Approve and determine the final plans, specifications and estimates for state highways and cause contracts for state highway work to be let by contract in the manner provided by law.
  8. Expend funds appropriated for construction, maintenance and improvement of state highways.
  9. Designate state highways, or parts of them, as controlled-access facilities and regulate, restrict or prohibit access to those highways to serve the traffic for which the facility is intended.
  10. Close or restrict the use of any state highway whenever the closing or restricting of use is deemed by the board to be necessary for the protection of the public or for the protection of the highway or any section from damage.
  11. Designate main traveled state highways as through highways. The traffic on through highways shall have the right-of-way over the traffic on any other highway intersecting with it, provided, that at the intersection of two (2) through highways the board shall determine which traffic shall have the right-of-way.
  12. Furnish, erect and maintain standard signs on side highways directing drivers of vehicles approaching a designated through highway to come to a full stop before entering or crossing the through highway.
  13. Provide a right-of-way for and supervise the construction of side paths or sidewalks along regularly designated state highways outside the boundaries of incorporated cities and the expenditures for the construction of them may be made from the highway funds of the county or highway districts.
  14. Upon certification and requisition of an appropriate board, commission, governing body, or official head of any state institution and on the approval of the governor, showing the same to be necessary, construct, alter, repair, and maintain the roadways in, through, and about the grounds of state institutions. The construction, alteration, repair and maintenance shall be accomplished and paid for from the state highway account in accordance with the provisions of chapter 7, title 40, Idaho Code. This provision shall not be construed to divest any board, commission, governing body, or official head of an institution their constitutional or statutory powers.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-310, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 258, § 1, p. 858; am. 2013, ch. 141, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 141, rewrote subsection (1) to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable. Compiler’s Notes.

Following the amendment of this section by S.L. 2013, ch. 141, this section has a paragraph (1)(a), but no paragraph (1)(b).

CASE NOTES

Effect of Adopted Guidelines.

Unlike its designation of design, color, and word message, the DOT has determined that the size of a stop sign may be varied, and, in fact, should be where emphasis or visibility so requires; having adopted such a guideline, however, the department is bound to abide by it; therefore, the fact that the department erected a standard 30/ts30 inch stop sign at the intersection does not necessarily establish its fulfillment of its duty if, in fact, the department failed to exercise ordinary care in implementing its own policies and guidelines. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

Implied Powers.

The power to determine when and how a developer may build an encroachment is implied from the Idaho Transportation Department’s (ITD) authority to regulate the design of public highways. A conditional permit allows the ITD to reserve the right to review construction plans to guarantee that applicants comply with the approved encroachment designs. The ITD’s regional departments use conditional permits to enforce highway-safety standards while assuring the applicant that he or she can develop detailed construction plans, obtain the necessary rights-of-way from other landowners, and undertake other final expenses. Vickers v. Lowe, 150 Idaho 439, 247 P.3d 666 (2011).

Rule-making Authority.

Where the legislature enacts a statute requiring that an administrative agency carry out specific functions, i.e., furnish, erect and maintain signs on side highways, that agency cannot validly subvert the legislation by promulgating contradictory rules; thus, although the legislature delegated some rule-making authority to the DOT to adopt specifications for a uniform system of traffic-control devices, the department was not, thereby, permitted to institute rules or policies limiting its ability to achieve its express statutory duties to place signs on side roads. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

State Jurisdiction.
Statutory Duties.

In a prosecution against Indian tribe member for leaving the scene of an accident and for aggravated driving under the influence, where the defendant challenged the state’s jurisdiction over a section of U.S. Highway 95 that is within the boundaries of an Indian reservation, the trial court could have taken judicial notice of the “Official Highway Map” which the Idaho transportation department periodically issues and widely distributes for convenience of motorists; while these maps may not be conclusive on the subject of “principal” highways, they are reliable authority. State v. Smith, 124 Idaho 671, 862 P.2d 1093 (Ct. App. 1993). Statutory Duties.

An administrative agency may not alter, modify or diminish its statutorily-imposed responsibilities, either unilaterally or through agreement with another public or private entity, absent legislative authority to do so; thus, the fact that the county highway district had assumed part of the DOT’s legal obligations might affect the rights and liabilities between the department and the county highway district; however, such an agreement between these two entities does not alter the statutory duty owed by the department to the plaintiff involved in a car wreck. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

The DOT alone, has an express statutory duty with respect to erecting and maintaining signs at its highways’ intersections; the legislature in no way qualified this duty by the condition that the sign-placing or maintenance activities occur exclusively within boundaries of the state highway system; thus, contrary to the department’s position that it was without “jurisdiction” to place and maintain signs outside of its right-of-way, the department had both the authority and an express statutory duty to do so. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

Where the record did not reflect that the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) followed the statutory procedure to abandon highway where accident occurred killing plaintiff’s son, even though it had not been used by the ITD for more than 30 years, a question of material fact as to whether the ITD properly abandoned such highway existed and trial court’s erred in granting summary judgment for the ITD. Dachlet v. State, 130 Idaho 204, 938 P.2d 1242 (1997).

Cited

Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. State, 147 Idaho 232, 207 P.3d 963 (2009); Wylie v. State, 151 Idaho 26, 253 P.3d 700 (2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Denial of Right to Full Use.

Abutting property owners in a block approaching a subway under railway tracks were not entitled to compensation or damages for being deprived of the right to the full use of the street at its level before the commencement of such construction, nor for the diversion of traffic therefrom, since the construction was a proper street use and the inconvenience incident thereto did not amount to a taking of property within the meaning of the constitution and condemnation laws. Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291, 53 P.2d 626 (1935).

Discretion of Department.
Legal Counsel.

Department of public works (now division of public works of the department of transportation) did not abuse its discretion in the construction of a subway under a railroad track, as respects right of abutting property owners in the block approaching the subway, where it was made to appear that 150 trains passed over the crossing of the railroad tracks and approximately 5,000 vehicles crossed over the railroad tracks on the crossing, and 1,000 pedestrians likewise crossed the tracks on such crossing per day. The purpose of the exercise of the discretion of the highway department (now division of highways of the department of transportation) being the elimination of the grade crossing, abutting property owners in the block approaching said crossing were not entitled to compensation for, or an injunction against the diversion of traffic therefrom. Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291, 53 P.2d 626 (1935). Legal Counsel.

Former law that provided that transportation board should determine state highway system and provide procedure for public’s questions and protests concerning such determination contemplated the need of legal counsel to represent the highway board (now transportation board), and constituted a legislative recognition of the authority granted by law providing for powers and duties of board to employ counsel. Padgett v. Williams, 82 Idaho 28, 348 P.2d 944 (1960).

Mandamus Proceedings.

In proceedings for a writ of mandamus by a highway district against the commissioner of public works and director of highways to compel the state to maintain a portion of the state highway within the district, and where it was admitted that the district had cooperated in construction of the highway, under an agreement between the state and the highway district, the district was not required, in order to maintain its action, to produce the alleged agreement for joint construction. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Merritt, 59 Idaho 603, 85 P.2d 685 (1938).

Powers of Board.

The legislature delegated to the board of highway directors (now transportation board) the authority to build and maintain highways and to enter into and perform all lawful contracts for that purpose and having appropriated moneys to the board for that purpose and there being money available for the payment of plaintiff foreign corporation’s claim for aerial photography work and the same having been properly approved and certified to the state auditor in proper form and the state auditor having submitted the same to the state board of examiners, that board had no power or authority to withhold its approval of the claim and it was the duty of the state auditor to issue warrant for the payment thereof. Aero Serv. Corp. W. v. Benson, 84 Idaho 416, 374 P.2d 277 (1962).

Landscaping involves architectural and engineering questions and, as such, were included in the power of the board of highway directors (now transportation board) to make decision involving the design and construction of state highways. City of Boise City v. Idaho Bd. of Hwy. Dirs., 94 Idaho 302, 486 P.2d 1015 (1971).

Tort Liability.

The highway department (now division of highways of the department of transportation) was subject to liability for harm caused to persons lawfully using the highways for the purposes intended when the department created or maintained a dangerous condition on the highway if it knew or by exercise of reasonable care would discover such condition, should have realized that the condition involved an unreasonable risk of harm to those using the highways, should have expected that persons using the highway would not discover or realize danger, failed to exercise reasonable care to make the condition safe or to adequately warn of the condition and the risk involved, and persons using the highway did not know or have reason to know of the condition and attendant risks. Smith v. State, 93 Idaho 795, 473 P.2d 937 (1970).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-311. Powers and duties — Property.

The board shall:

  1. Purchase, exchange, condemn or otherwise acquire, any real property, either in fee or in any lesser estate or interest, rights-of-way, easements and other rights and rights of direct access from the property abutting highways with controlled access, deemed necessary by the board for present or future state highway purposes. The order of the board that the land sought is necessary for such use shall be prima facie evidence of that fact.
  2. Cooperate with and receive donations and aid from private sources in the form of improvements to state owned property.
  3. Purchase, lease or otherwise acquire and develop lands for the purpose of securing highway making materials, and purchase, lease or otherwise acquire mill and factory sites and construct, equip and operate mills and factories for the reduction and manufacture of highway making materials.
  4. Sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of and convey, in accordance with law, any real property, other than public lands which by the constitution and laws of the state of Idaho are placed under the jurisdiction of the state land board, or parts of them, together with appurtenances. When in the opinion of the board the real property and/or appurtenances are no longer needed for state highway purposes, dispose of any surplus materials and by-products from the real property and appurtenances.
  5. Make a lump sum payment with funds available for acquisition, when irrigable lands served or to be served by an irrigation works and system of an organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated, existing for the purpose of furnishing water for irrigation, are acquired by the board. The cost and expense of the acquisition of those lands for highway purposes shall be in an amount sufficient to pay the pro rata share of the organization’s indebtedness, if any, including the organization’s indebtedness to the United States or any public or private lending agency, allocable to the lands acquired by the board, together with interest on the pro rata share of the indebtedness in the event the indebtedness shall not be callable in advance of maturity. If the lands acquired by the board and the construction of a highway on those lands shall intersect the irrigation works and system of the organization, then a further sum shall be paid the organization sufficient for the value of the property acquired by the board, and the severance damage to the irrigation works and system, including the damage resulting from the interference and impairment of the operation of the works and system.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-311, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State land board, Idaho Const., Art. IX, § 7 and§ 58-101.

CASE NOTES

Scope of Valuation.

The director of the Idaho transportation board had the power to sign an accelerated condemnation order on behalf of the board. The accelerated condemnation was properly conducted where the condemned property was valued relative to use as part of a highway widening and interchange; the valuation was not required to include potential increase in value from an unrelated proposed road extension project. State DOT v. HJ Grathol, 153 Idaho 87, 278 P.3d 957 (2012).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Condemnation Proceeding.

Where a part of the owner’s contiguous land was taken in a condemnation proceeding, all inconveniences resulting to the owner’s remaining land, including an easement or access to a road or right of way formerly enjoyed, which decreased the value of the land retained by the owner, were elements of severance damage for which compensation should be paid. State ex rel. Rich v. Fonburg, 80 Idaho 269, 328 P.2d 60 (1958).

The state was authorized by§ 7-701 and former law providing for powers and duties of the transportation board to condemn land to be used for a limited access highway and acquire the fee title to privately owned property, limiting or curtailing entry of an adjoining landowner which would ordinarily be appurtenant to the land not taken. State ex rel. Rich v. Fonburg, 80 Idaho 269, 328 P.2d 60 (1958).

— Intervention.

Highway district was a proper party and may intervene in a case where it was sought to condemn lands within its boundaries. State ex rel. McKelvey v. Barnes, 55 Idaho 578, 45 P.2d 293 (1935).

Eminent Domain.

The power of eminent domain extends to every kind of property authorized by law within the jurisdiction of the state, when taken for a public use, including the right of access to and from a public highway. State ex rel. Rich v. Fonburg, 80 Idaho 269, 328 P.2d 60 (1958).

§ 40-312. Powers and duties — Rules and regulations.

The board shall:

  1. Prescribe rules and regulations affecting state highways and turnpike projects and enforce compliance with those rules and regulations.
  2. Establish rules and regulations for the expenditure of all moneys appropriated or allotted by law to the department or the board. The board shall cooperate with the counties and highway districts in the expenditure of funds and shall establish a uniform system of accounting in the expenditure of moneys and a uniform method for allocation of funds by counties and highway districts as shall be necessary in the construction and maintenance of highways by counties and districts in cooperation with the state and the United States, or either, but the initiatory power of expenditure of any of those moneys shall rest with the county or district in which expenditure of the moneys mentioned is to be made.
  3. Make reasonable regulations for the installation, construction, maintenance, repair, renewal and relocation of facilities of any utility or communication transmitting entity, in, on, along, over, across, through or under any project on the federal-aid primary or secondary systems or on the interstate system, including extensions within urban areas. Whenever the board shall determine, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that it is necessary that any facilities which now are, or hereafter may be, located in, on, along, over, across, through or under any federal-aid primary or secondary system or on the interstate system, including extensions within urban areas, should be relocated, the utility owning or operating the facilities shall relocate them in accordance with the order of the board. In case of any relocation of facilities, the utility owning or operating the facilities, its successors or assigns, may maintain and operate the facilities, with the necessary appurtenances, in the new location or locations.
  4. Prescribe and enforce regulations for the erection and maintenance of advertising structures permitted by sections 40-1909, 40-1913 and 40-1914, Idaho Code, designed to protect the safety of the users of the highway and otherwise to achieve the objectives set forth in section 40-1903, Idaho Code, and consistent with the national policy set forth in 23 U.S.C. 131 and the national standards promulgated by the secretary of transportation. The board shall not prescribe or enforce rules or regulations that are more restrictive than those authorized under 23 U.S.C. 131. Proceedings for review of any action taken by the board pursuant to this section shall be instituted under the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  5. Prescribe rules and regulations to implement the provisions of chapter 20, title 40, Idaho Code, and other rules and regulations relating to relocation assistance as may be necessary under existing federal laws and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Rules and regulations shall include provisions relating to:
    1. Standards for decent, safe and sanitary dwellings;
    2. Eligibility of displaced persons for relocation assistance payments, procedural methods whereby persons may make application for and claim payments and the amounts of them; and
    3. Other rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of chapter 20, title 40, Idaho Code, as are considered necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of that chapter.
  6. Establish by rule a statewide comprehensive plan for public transportation.
History.

(7) Prescribe rules and regulations to encourage the use of recycled materials in highway construction and repair projects. History.

I.C.,§ 40-312, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1992, ch. 149, § 3, p. 447; am. 1992, ch. 337, § 1, p. 1008; am. 2014, ch. 97, § 24, p. 265.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1992 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

Both amendments added a different subsection (6). The amendment by S.L. 1992, ch. 149, § 3 was compiled as subsection (6). The amendment by S.L. 1992, ch. 337, § 1 was designated as subsection (7) through the use of brackets.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 97, made the temporary renumbering of the amendment by S.L. 1992, ch. 337, § 1 permanent.

CASE NOTES

Cited

Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. State, 147 Idaho 232, 207 P.3d 963 (2009).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Relocation of Utilities.

It was unconstitutional for the state to pay compensation to utilities ordered to relocate their facilities located on public highways, since utilities acquire no permanent property right to the use of public highways, but a permissive use only; therefore, such payment was prohibited by the constitutional limitations of Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 17, and Idaho Const., Art. VIII, § 2. State ex rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co., 81 Idaho 487, 346 P.2d 596 (1959).

§ 40-313. Powers and duties — Beautification and information.

The board shall:

  1. Furnish, erect and maintain, whenever necessary for public safety and convenience, suitable signs, markers, signals and other devices to control, guide and warn pedestrians and vehicular traffic entering or traveling upon the state highway system.
  2. Forbid, restrict or limit the erection of unauthorized signs, billboards or structures on the right-of-way of any state highway, and remove therefrom and destroy any unauthorized signs existing on them.
  3. Acquire, maintain and improve areas adjacent to highways on the state highway system for the restoration, preservation, and enhancement of scenic beauty, for use as informational sites, and for rest and recreation of the traveling public. The areas shall be parallel to and contiguous with the highway and shall not exceed a width of one thousand (1,000) feet from the adjacent right-of-way line. The board may acquire these areas in fee, easement, or other interest as may be determined by the board to be reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes of chapter 15, title 40, Idaho Code. Such acquisition is declared to be for a highway use, and may be by gift, purchase, exchange or eminent domain, and if the latter be necessary, it shall be carried out in the same manner as now provided by law for acquisition of right-of-way for state highways.
  4. Screen, if feasible, any junkyard lawfully in existence on March 20, 1967, which are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way and visible from the main traveled way of any highway on the interstate or primary system and not located within an industrial area, zoned or unzoned. The responsibility of the board for screening junkyards is limited to the size of the junkyards and height of storage existing as of March 20, 1967. Any screening, after March 20, 1967, required by an increase in the size of the junkyard or the height of the storage in it shall be the responsibility of the owner and will be done at his expense. The board is authorized to acquire by purchase, gift or the power of eminent domain the lands or interest in lands as may be necessary to provide adequate screening of junkyards, but eminent domain proceedings may not be undertaken to obtain adjacent lands unless they are owned by the owner of the junkyard or the lands of the junkyard are inadequate for this purpose. When the board determines that the topography of the land will not permit adequate screening of junkyards within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of the highway on the interstate or primary system or the screening of the junkyards would not be economically feasible, the board must acquire by gift, purchase or the power of eminent domain, any interests necessary to secure the removal or disposal of the junkyard.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-313, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Rule-making Authority.

Where the legislature enacts a statute requiring that an administrative agency carry out specific functions, i.e., furnish, erect and maintain signs on side highways, that agency cannot validly subvert the legislation by promulgating contradictory rules; thus, although the legislature delegated some rule-making authority to the DOT to adopt specifications for a uniform system of traffic-control devices, the department was not, thereby, permitted to institute rules or policies limiting its ability to achieve its express statutory duties to place signs on side roads. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

Statutory Duties.

An administrative agency may not alter, modify or diminish its statutorily-imposed responsibilities, either unilaterally or through agreement with another public or private entity, absent legislative authority to do so; thus, the fact that the county highway district had assumed part of the DOT’s legal obligations might affect the rights and liabilities between the department and the county highway district; however, such an agreement between these two entities does not alter the statutory duty owed by the department to the plaintiff involved in a car wreck. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

The DOT, alone, has an express statutory duty with respect to erecting and maintaining signs at its highways’ intersections; the legislature in no way qualified this duty by the condition that the sign-placing or maintenance activities occur exclusively within boundaries of the state highway system; thus, contrary to the department’s position that it was without “jurisdiction” to place and maintain signs outside of its right-of-way, the department had both the authority and an express statutory duty to do so. Roberts v. Reed, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct. App. 1991).

Cited

Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. State, 147 Idaho 232, 207 P.3d 963 (2009).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Unauthorized Signs.

The authority granted by former law that forbade erection on highways of billboards or signs carried with it the duty and power to determine what constitutes such an obstruction and such a determination made by the board was conclusive in the absence of a showing of arbitrary exercise of this authority or an abuse of discretion. State ex rel. Burns v. Kelly, 89 Idaho 139, 403 P.2d 566 (1965).

§ 40-314. Powers and duties — Departmental.

The board shall:

  1. Establish departmental internal structures deemed necessary for the full and efficient administration of this title.
  2. Exercise exclusive control over the employment, promotion, reduction, dismissal and compensation of all employees of the department.
  3. Exercise any other powers and duties, including the adoption of rules and regulations, deemed necessary to fully implement and carry out the provisions of this title and the control of the financial affairs of the board and the department.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-314, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-315. Powers and duties — Federally-funded highway project financing.

  1. In order to address the increasing need for timely improvements to Idaho’s highway transportation infrastructure, the board may:
    1. Enter into agreements with the Idaho housing and finance association in connection with the funding of highway transportation projects qualifying for reimbursement from federal funds.
    2. Approve and recommend federal highway transportation projects to the Idaho housing and finance association for financing by the association. Such federal highway transportation projects shall be eligible for federal-aid debt financing under chapter 1, title 23, United States Code, and approval by the federal highway administration as an advanced construction (AC) project thereunder. The board shall select and designate such transportation projects to be funded with bond proceeds from the following list of eligible projects:
    3. On and after July 1, 2008, all allocations of GARVEE bond proceeds shall be the sole responsibility and duty of the Idaho transportation board. The legislature shall have authority to approve a total GARVEE bond amount on an annual basis. However, the Idaho transportation board is directed to allocate bond revenue only among the projects listed in subsection (1)(b) of this section. In making its funding allocation for projects, the board shall take into consideration: the cost of the project and whether or not that project could be financed without bonding; whether the project is necessary to facilitate the traffic flow on vital transportation corridors; and whether the project is necessary to improve safety for the traveling public. On and after July 1, 2008, the board shall use due care in selecting projects for bonding and shall balance and coordinate the use of bonding with the use of highway construction moneys.
  2. Prior to issuance by the Idaho housing and finance association of any bonds or notes to finance highway transportation projects, the board shall certify to the association that sufficient federal transportation funds are available to make any payments required for such bonds or notes. (3) The board shall limit annual, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses as follows:
    1. In the 2006 legislative session for the fiscal year 2007 budget, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses on federally-funded highway project financing shall be no more than twenty percent (20%) of annual federal-aid highway apportionments.
    2. In the 2007 legislative session for the fiscal year 2008 budget, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses on federally-funded highway project financing shall be no more than twenty percent (20%) of annual federal-aid highway apportionments.
    3. In the 2008 legislative session for the fiscal year 2009 budget, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses on federally-funded highway project financing shall be no more than twenty percent (20%) of annual federal-aid highway apportionments.
    4. In the 2009 legislative session for the fiscal year 2010 budget, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses on federally-funded highway project financing shall be no more than twenty percent (20%) of annual federal-aid highway apportionments.
    5. In the 2010 legislative session for the fiscal year 2011 budget, total cumulative debt service and other bond-related expenses on federally-funded highway project financing shall be no more than thirty percent (30%) of annual federal-aid highway apportionments.
    6. Beginning with the 2011 legislative session for the fiscal year 2012 budget, or for any year thereafter, the thirty percent (30%) limit may be exceeded, but only by affirmative action of both the house of representatives and the senate, and with the approval of the governor.

ROUTE      PROJECT DESCRIPTION

US-95      SH-1 to Canadian border

US-95      Garwood to Sagle

US-95      Worley to Setters

US-95      Thorn Creek to Moscow

US-95      Smokey Boulder to Hazard Creek

SH-16 Ext      I-84 to South Emmett

I-84      Caldwell to Meridian

I-84      Orchard to Isaacs Canyon

US-93      Twin Falls alternate route and new Snake River crossing

SH-75      Timmerman to Ketchum

US-20      St. Anthony to Ashton

US-30      McCammon to Soda Springs

Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1)(b) of this section wherein eligible projects are listed for selection and designation by the board, if any of the designated projects are deemed to be ineligible by the board, the board shall have the authority to replace those projects with other projects listed in subsection (1)(b) of this section.

(4) In the event the board selects and designates to be funded with bond proceeds any of the transportation projects listed in subsection (1) of this section, and prior to entering into agreements with the Idaho housing and finance association as provided herein, the Idaho transportation department, as part of its annual budget request prepared pursuant to section 67-3502, Idaho Code, shall include a request for bonding authority as a separate item of its budget request. This request for bonding authority shall include a list of planned highway transportation projects to be financed with such bond financing during the next succeeding fiscal year.

(5) By June 30 of each year, the board shall submit a report to the legislature concerning projects currently under construction using the bond financing as authorized by the provisions of this section, and shall include a list of planned highway transportation projects to be financed with such bond financing during the next succeeding fiscal year.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-315, as added by 2005, ch. 378, § 3, p. 1217; am. 2007, ch. 363, § 13, p. 1095; am. 2017, ch. 322, § 7, p. 841.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho housing and finance association,§ 67-6201 et seq.

Prior Laws.
Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 363, added subsection (1)(c); and in the last paragraph in subsection (1), substituted “projects listed in subsection (1)(b) of this section” for “projects deemed eligible by the board.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 322, deleted “SH-16 Ext     South Emmett to Mesa with connection to SH-55” immediately following “Smokey Boulder to Hazard Creek” in the listing in subsection (1)(b).

Legislative Intent.

Section 6 of S.L. 2007, ch. 363 provided “It is legislative intent that the Idaho Transportation Board direct the use of the revenue raised from the bonding authority provided in Section 1 of this act in such a manner that revenue shall be expended in a priority fashion and that the first priority of expenditures shall be for construction, followed in order of priority by expenditures for right-of-way acquisition, followed in priority by other necessary project-related costs.”

Section 8 of S.L. 2007, ch. 363 provided “It is legislative intent that the Idaho Transportation Board has the authority to adjust GARVEE bond proceeds allocated among the projects as listed in Section 2 of this act, provided that such an adjustment is necessary due to unanticipated reasons or circumstances or to accommodate federally approved alternative and innovative approaches to the overall project development process; and provided further, that no proceeds shall be used for any projects not listed in Section 2 of this act.”

Federal References.

Chapter 1 of Title 23 of the United States Code, referred to in paragraph (1)(b), is codified as 23 USCS § 101 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the GARVEE transportation program, see http://www.itd.idaho.gov/Projects/garvee/default.asp .

The letters “AC” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Section 16 of S.L. 2017, ch. 322 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

S.L. 2017, Chapter 322 became law without the signature of the governor.

§ 40-316. Powers and duties — Reports.

The board shall:

  1. Make annually, on or before December 1 of each year and at other times as the governor may require, reports in writing to the governor concerning the condition, management and financial transactions of the department.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-316, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was enacted with a subsection (1), but no subsection (2).

§ 40-317. Powers and duties — Cooperative efforts.

The board may:

  1. Cooperate with, and receive and expend aid and donations from, the federal government for transportation purposes and receive and expend donations from other sources for the construction and improvement of any state highway or transportation project or any project on the federal-aid primary or secondary systems or on the interstate system, including extensions of them within urban areas; and, when authorized or directed by any act of congress or any rule or regulation of any agency of the federal government, expend funds donated or granted to the state of Idaho by the federal government for that purpose, upon highways and bridges not in the state highway system.
  2. Contract jointly with counties, cities, and highway districts for the improvement and construction of state highways.
  3. Cooperate with the federal government, counties, highway districts, and cities for construction, improvement, and maintenance of secondary or feeder highways not in the state highway system.
  4. Cooperate financially or otherwise with any other state or any county or city of any other state, or with any foreign country or any province or district of any foreign country, or with the government of the United States or its agencies, or private agencies or persons, for the erecting, construction, reconstructing, and maintaining of any bridge, trestle, or other structure for the continuation or connection of any state highway across any stream, body of water, gulch, navigable water, swamp or other topographical formation requiring any such structure and forming a boundary between the state of Idaho and any other state or foreign country, and for the purchase or condemnation or other acquisition of right-of-way.
  5. Serve as the state’s representative in the designation of forest highways within the state.
  6. Negotiate and enter into bilateral agreements with designated representatives of contiguous states. Agreements may provide for the manning and operation of jointly occupied ports of entry, for the collection of highway user fees, registration fees and taxes which may be required by law, rule and regulation. Agreements may further provide for the collection of these fees and taxes by either party state at jointly occupied ports of entry before authorization is given for vehicles to legally operate within that state or jurisdiction, and for the enforcement of safety, size and weight laws, rules or regulations of the respective states. As to the provisions of chapter 30, title 63, Idaho Code, the state tax commission is hereby authorized to enter into reciprocal agreements with other states concerning the exemption of, or taxation of, persons employed by the state of Idaho or of another state in jointly operated ports of entry. As used in this section, “jointly operated ports of entry” shall mean any state operated facility located within or without this state that employs persons that are direct employees of the state of Idaho and of another state which operates for the mutual benefit of both states.
  7. Pursuant to the authority and process defined in sections 67-2328 and 67-2333, Idaho Code, enter into agreements with authorized representatives of contiguous states for the purpose of establishing reciprocal procedures allowing the Idaho transportation department and contiguous state motor vehicle departments to collect fees for and to issue driver’s licenses and identification cards to nonresident individuals in the same manner as would be issued in the individual’s home state, provided that no Idaho driver’s license or Idaho identification card may be issued to a nonresident of the state of Idaho and that any reciprocal agreement under this provision shall otherwise be consistent with the driver license compact, chapter 20, title 49, Idaho Code. (8) Enter into all contracts and agreements with the United States government in the name of the state of Idaho, relating to the survey, construction and maintenance of roads, under the provisions of any act of congress including county and city highways, and submit a program of construction and maintenance as may be required by the United States government or any of its agencies, and do all other things necessary to cooperate and complete those programs.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-317, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 99, § 1, p. 277; am. 1989, ch. 273, § 1, p. 660; am. 1994, ch. 280, § 2, p. 867; am. 2013, ch. 258, § 1, p. 634; am. 2014, ch. 97, § 25, p. 265.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 258, added present subsection (7) and redesignated former subsection (7) as subsection (8).

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 97, corrected a typographical error and made minor stylistic changes in subsections (1) and (6).

Effective Dates.

Section 8 of S.L. 1994, ch. 280 provided that §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1994. Sections 2, 6 and 7 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1995.

§ 40-318. Limitation of political activity.

  1. No officer or employee of the department or board shall:
    1. Use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with an election to or a nomination for office, or affecting the result thereof;
    2. Directly or indirectly coerce, attempt to coerce, command, or direct any other such officer or employee to pay, lend, or contribute any part of his salary or compensation or anything else of value to any party, committee, organization, agency, or person for political purposes; or
    3. Be a candidate and hold elective office in any partisan election.
  2. All such officers and employees shall retain the right to:
    1. Register and vote in any election;
    2. Express an opinion as an individual privately and publicly on political subjects and candidates;
    3. Display a political picture, sticker, badge, or button;
    4. Participate in the nonpartisan activities of a civic, community, social, labor, or professional organization, or of a similar organization;
    5. Be a member of a political party or other political organization and participate in its activities;
    6. Attend a political convention, rally, fund-raising function, or other political gathering;
    7. Sign a political petition as an individual;
    8. Make a financial contribution to a political party or organization;
    9. Take an active part in support of a candidate in an election;
    10. Be politically active in connection with a question which is not specifically identified with a political party, such as a constitutional amendment, referendum, approval of a municipal ordinance or any other question or issue of a similar character;
    11. Serve as an election judge or clerk, or in a similar position to perform nonpartisan duties as prescribed by state or local law;
    12. Be a candidate and hold elective office in any nonpartisan election;
    13. Take an active part in political organization management; and
    14. Otherwise participate fully in public affairs, except as prohibited by law, in a manner which does not materially compromise the neutrality, efficiency, or integrity of the officer’s or employee’s administration of state functions.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-318, as added by 1990, ch. 356, § 2, p. 964.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-318, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-317, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1990, ch. 356, § 1, effective April 10, 1990.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1990, ch. 356 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 1990.

§ 40-319. Good faith of state pledged to appropriation.

For the construction and maintenance of highways as may be eligible for federal aid funds, excepting turnpike projects, the good faith of the state is pledged to make available funds which combined with funds made available by counties, highway districts and cities sufficient to match funds made available to the state of Idaho by the United States government for highway purposes and for the purpose of evidencing good faith, the board in the name of the state, is authorized to enter into any and all agreements with the United States government under rules and regulations approved by the United States government or any of its agencies.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-319, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-320. State highway construction and right-of-way costs borne by state — Exceptions.

All costs of constructing, reconstructing and acquiring rights-of-way for highways in the state highway system shall be borne by the state. However, when a county or incorporated city in which a state highway is located, or is to be located, desires a higher standard of construction or reconstruction than is planned, the county or city may, with the approval of the board, pay the additional cost.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-320, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Power to Contract.

Highway district could enter into joint contract with state and United States for construction of road and apportionment of cost. Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 49 Idaho 603, 290 P. 717 (1930).

§ 40-321. Commercial enterprises on prohibited access highways prohibited — Exception — Connecting service highways.

No commercial enterprise or activity for serving motor vehicle users, other than emergency services for disabled vehicles and vending machines permitted under the provisions of federal law or federal rule and section 67-5411, Idaho Code, and board right-of-way use permit shall be conducted within or on any property designated as, or acquired for, or in connection with a prohibited access highway, as designated by the Idaho transportation board. However, the board may construct on that property, at locations it deems appropriate, connecting service highways parallel to the prohibited access highways in such manner as to facilitate the establishment and operation of commercial enterprises for serving motor vehicle users on private property abutting those service highways.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-321, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-322. Directive on implementation of the federal REAL ID act of 2005.

  1. The legislature finds that the enactment into law by the U.S. congress of the REAL ID act of 2005, as part of public law 109-13, was adopted by the U.S. congress in violation of the principles of federalism contained in the 10th amendment to the constitution of the United States. The legislature reaffirms this position, while acknowledging that failure to implement certain provisions could adversely affect Idaho’s citizens and businesses. Furthermore, it is the intent of the legislature to continue to protect the privacy and security of the state’s residents.
  2. The legislature hereby declares that the state of Idaho shall:
    1. Meet the requirements for driver’s licenses and identification cards, as described in title II of the REAL ID act of 2005, as such requirements existed on January 1, 2016;
    2. Not comply with any additional requirements enacted after January 1, 2016, without the express statutory approval of the Idaho state legislature;
    3. Submit compliance extension requests and status reports for the purposes outlined in paragraph (a) of this subsection to the United States department of homeland security.
    4. At such time as the Idaho transportation board and the Idaho transportation department achieve approval by the department of homeland security for issuance of REAL ID compliant driver’s licenses and identification cards, any applicant for an Idaho driver’s license or identification card shall be offered the option of obtaining a REAL ID compliant license or identification card or an Idaho driver’s license or identification card that is not REAL ID compliant. In offering an applicant the option of a REAL ID compliant or REAL ID noncompliant driver’s license or identification card, the department shall provide the applicant with written information of the following for both REAL ID compliant and noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards:
      1. The purposes for which REAL ID compliant and noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards are valid;
      2. What types, if any, of electronic copies of source documents will be retained by the department for REAL ID compliant and noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards;
      3. Whether facial image capture will be retained by the department, even if a driver’s license or identification card is not issued, for REAL ID compliant and noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards; and
      4. Any other information the department deems necessary to inform the applicant about REAL ID compliant and noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards.
  3. This act shall be construed as to allow the Idaho transportation board and the Idaho transportation department to take reasonable and necessary steps to enhance the security of Idaho state driver’s licenses and identification cards to ensure their acceptance for commercial airline travel within the United States.
History.

(4) Beginning January 1, 2016, the department shall report to the senate transportation committee and the house of representatives transportation and defense committee on the acceptance of compliance extension requests and status reports to the United States department of homeland security, as set forth in subsection (2) of this section. Such report shall be submitted concurrently with the department’s report on progress the department is making toward upgrading and implementing the division of motor vehicles’ automated system. Such report shall be submitted no later than January 1 of each year through 2020, unless extended or revoked by the legislature. History.

I.C.,§ 40-322, as added by 2008, ch. 385, § 2, p. 1060; am. 2015, ch. 42, § 1, p. 94; am. 2016, ch. 228, § 1, p. 625; am. 2017, ch. 175, § 1, p. 405.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 42, in subsection (2), inserted “except to submit compliance extension requests and status reports to the United States department of homeland security” in the first and second sentences; in subsection (3), inserted “and necessary” following “reasonable” and added “to ensure their acceptance for commercial airline travel within the United States” at the end; and added subsection (4).

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 228, rewrote this section, lifting the moratorium REAL ID.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 175, added paragraph (2)(d).

Federal References.

The REAL ID act of 2005 is Division B of P.L. 109-13, which is codified as 8 USCS §§ 1101, 1157 to 1159, 1182, 1184, 1227, 1229a, 1231, 1252, 1356 and 18 USCS § 1028.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 1 of S.L. 2008, ch. 385 provided “The Second Regular Session of the Fifty-ninth Idaho Legislature hereby finds that:

“(1) In May of 2005, the U.S. Congress enacted the REAL ID Act of 2005 as part of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief Act (Public Law 109-13), which was signed by President George W. Bush on May 11, 2005, and which becomes fully effective May 11, 2008; and

“(2) Some of the provisions of the REAL ID Act require states to:

“(a) Issue a driver’s license or state identification card in a uniform format, containing uniform information, all as prescribed by the Department of Homeland Security;

“(b) Verify the issuance, validity and completeness of all primary documents used to issue a driver’s license, such as those showing that the bearer is a U.S. citizen or a lawful alien, a lawful refugee, or a person holding a valid visa;

“(c) Provide for secure storage of all primary documents that are used to issue a federally approved driver’s license or state identification card;

“(d) Provide fraudulent document recognition training to all persons engaged in issuing driver’s licenses or state identification cards; and

“(e) Issue a driver’s license or state identification card in a prescribed format if it is a license or card that does not meet the criteria provided for a federally approved license or identification card; and

“(3) Use of the federal minimum standards for state driver’s licenses and state-issued identification cards will be necessary for any type of federally regulated activity for which an identification card must be displayed, including flying in a commercial airplane, making transactions with a federally licensed bank, entering a federal building, or making application for federally supported public assistance benefits, including social security; and “(4) Some of the intended privacy requirements of the REAL ID Act, such as the use of common machine-readable technology and state maintenance of a database that can be shared with the United States and agencies of other states, may actually make it more likely that a federally required driver’s license or state identification card, or the information about the bearer on which the license or card is based, will be stolen, sold or otherwise used for purposes that were never intended or that are criminally related, than if the REAL ID Act had not been enacted; and

“(5) These potential breaches in privacy that could result directly from compliance with the REAL ID Act may violate the right to privacy of thousands of residents of Idaho; and

“(6) The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has estimated the cost to implement the REAL ID Act to be $3.9 billion to the states and $5.8 billion to individuals, of which the U.S. Congress has pledged only $81.3 million, or less than 1% of the total cost; and

“(7) For all these reasons, seventeen states passed legislation opposing the REAL ID Act in 2007, including Idaho, which passed House Joint Memorial No. 3 declaring refusal to participate in the REAL ID program; and

“(8) The regulations that have been adopted by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to implement the requirements of the REAL ID Act were issued in January of 2008, and pushed compliance with the REAL ID Act to 2014 for individuals born after 1964, and to 2017 for individuals born before 1964, undercutting any security rationale that might have existed for the original act; and

“(9) The final regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security fail to address the well known privacy problems with the REAL ID Act and in some cases, such as the issue of whether the machine-readable zone as encrypted may have exacerbated the problem; and

“(10) The federal government has been ineffective in stopping illegal immigration, resulting in millions of persons who are present in the United States of America without authorization; and

“(11) Securing our borders will greatly reduce the number of persons who enter our country without authorization and will do far more to provide security to our society than will increasing scrutiny on law-abiding American citizens by way of the REAL ID program; and

“(12) The mandate to the states, through federal legislation that provides no funding for its requirements, to issue what is, in effect, a national identification card, appears to be an attempt to ”commandeer“ the political machinery of the states and to require them to be agents of the federal government in violation of the principles of federalism contained in the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as construed by the United States Supreme Court in New York v. United States, 488 U.S. 1041 (1992), United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and Printz v. United States, 521 U. S. 898 (1997).”

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 385 provided that the act should take effect on and after July 1, 2008. Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 385 further provided that if the United States Department of Homeland Security revises its final administrative regulation, 6 CFR Part 37, relating to the REAL ID, and the Governor of the State of Idaho subsequently determines that such revised final regulation is acceptable to the State of Idaho, by Executive Order the Governor may initiate implementation of REAL ID during the 2008 interim, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 40-322, Idaho Code. However, continued implementation of REAL ID shall be subject to the approval by the members of the First Regular Session of the Sixtieth Idaho Legislature. Such legislative approval shall be evidenced by the repeal of Section 40-322, Idaho Code. The words “this act”, as used in subsection (3), refer to S.L. 2008, Chapter 385, which appears in this section and in the notes thereto.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2015, ch. 42 declared an emergency. Approved March 11, 2015.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Idaho Law Review.

Idaho Law Review. — Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Nullification and the Question of Gubernatorial Executive Power in Idaho, Comment. 49 Idaho L. Rev. 659 (2013).

Chapter 4 IDAHO TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

Sec.

§ 40-401. Turnpike projects.

The board is empowered to construct, maintain, repair and operate turnpike projects at locations established by it, and shall be an instrumentality exercising public and essential governmental functions in the construction, operation and maintenance of turnpike projects.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-401, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-401 to 40-403, which comprised S.L. 1939, ch. 16,§§ 1-3, p. 33; am. 1945, ch. 40, § 1, p. 51, were repealed by S.L. 1951, ch. 93, § 36, p. 165.

§ 40-402. Identification of turnpike projects.

Each specific turnpike project shall be clearly identified by an appropriate descriptive name and shall be operated as a separate enterprise. When a turnpike project is proposed by the board, it shall provide all surveys necessary to establish its economic feasibility, including the origin and destination counts, engineering surveys and other reports which may be required in order to secure adequate financing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-402, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-402 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-401.

§ 40-403. Incidental powers — Grade separations — Relocation of public highways — Right of entry.

  1. The board shall have power to construct grade separations at intersections of any turnpike project with public highways and to change and adjust the lines and grades of those highways in order to accommodate them to the design of the grade separation. The cost of the grade separations and any damage incurred in changing and adjusting lines and grades of highways shall be ascertained and paid by the board as a part of the cost of the turnpike project.
  2. If the board shall find it necessary to change the location of any portion of any public highway, it shall cause it to be reconstructed at a location as the highway board having jurisdiction over the highway to be reconstructed shall deem most favorable and of substantially the same type and in as good condition as the original highway. The cost of reconstruction and any damage incurred in changing the location of any highway shall be ascertained and paid by the board as a part of the cost of the turnpike project.
  3. Any highway affected by the construction of any turnpike project may be changed or relocated by the board in the manner provided by law for the vacation or relocation of public highways, and any damage awarded shall be paid by the board as a part of the cost of the project.
  4. The board and its authorized agents and employees may enter upon any lands, waters and premises in the state for the purposes of making surveys, soundings, drillings and examinations as it may deem necessary or convenient for the purposes of a turnpike project, and such an entry shall not be deemed a trespass, nor shall an entry for those purposes be deemed an entry under any condemnation proceedings which may be then pending. The board shall make reimbursement for any actual damages resulting to the lands, water, and premises as a result of those activities.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-403, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-403 was repealed. See Compiler’s notes,§ 40-401.

§ 40-404. Feeder highways.

  1. The board is authorized to:
    1. Construct, repair and maintain any feeder highway which in the opinion of the board will increase the use of a turnpike project to which the highway is a feeder;
    2. Assume maintenance and repair operations of an existing highway which is needed as a feeder highway. Before exercising these powers, consent of local authority exercising jurisdiction over the existing highway must be obtained; and
    3. Realign an existing highway and build additional sections of highway over new alignment in connection with the existing highway.
  2. Where a feeder highway is constructed over new alignment, the board is granted the same powers concerning construction as is granted in connection with the construction of the turnpike project. Any feeder highway, eighty per cent (80%) or more of which is built over new alignment, shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to be a new feeder highway.
  3. Where the board has constructed a new feeder highway, it shall have the obligation to maintain and repair the new feeder highway.
  4. No toll shall be charged for transit between points on any feeder or new feeder highway.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-404, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-404, which comprised 1939, ch. 16, § 4, p. 33, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-405. Tolls, fixing and collecting.

  1. The board is authorized to fix, revise, charge and collect tolls for the use of each turnpike project and the different parts or sections of the project, and to contract with any person, partnership, association or corporations desiring the use of any part of the project, including the right-of-way adjoining the paved portion, for the placement of telephone, telegraph, electric light or power lines, gas stations, garages, stores, hotels, and restaurants, or for any other purpose except for tracks for railroad or for railway use, and to fix the terms, conditions, rents and rates of charge for that use.
  2. The board shall construct any gasoline service facilities which it may determine are needed on the project, and to afford users of the project a reasonable choice of motor fuels of different brands. Each gasoline service station shall be separately offered for lease upon sealed bids. Notice of the offer shall be published once a week in three (3) successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the state. If acceptable bids are received, in the judgment of the board, each lease shall be awarded to the highest and best bidder, but no person shall be awarded or have the use of, nor shall motor fuel identified by trade marks, trade names or brands of any one (1) supplier, distributor or retailer of such fuel be sold at more than one (1) service station if they would constitute more than twenty-five per cent (25%) of the service stations on the entire project.
  3. No contract shall be required and no rent, fee or other charge of any kind shall be imposed for the use and occupation of any turnpike project for the installation, construction, use, operation, maintenance, repair, renewal, relocation or removal of tracks, pipes, mains, conduits, cables, wires, towers, poles or other equipment or appliances in, on, along, over or under any turnpike project by any public utility, person or corporation paying a tax for the privilege of using the public highways or other public places in the state.
  4. Tolls shall be so fixed and adjusted as to carry out and perform the terms and provisions of any contract with or for the benefit of bondholders. Tolls shall not be subject to supervision or regulation by any other department, division, bureau, commission, board, or agency of the state. The use and disposition of tolls and revenues shall be subject to the provisions of a resolution by the board in authorizing the issuance of bonds or of a trust agreement securing them.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-405, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-405, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405 as added by 1984, ch. 195, § 3, p. 445, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Another former§ 40-405, which comprised (1939, ch. 16, § 5, p. 33; am. 1945, ch. 133, § 1, p. 201; am. 1947, ch. 113, § 1, p. 259; am. 1950 (E.S.), ch. 83, § 1, p. 111; am. 1951, ch. 268, § 1, p. 568; am. 1955, ch. 266, § 1, p. 643; am. 1959, ch. 121, § 1, p. 263; am. 1963, ch. 355, § 1, p. 1018; am. 1972, ch. 294, § 1, p. 740; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 27, p. 61; 1980, ch. 269, § 1, p. 706; am. 1982, ch. 329, § 2, p. 834; am. 1983 (Ex. Sess.), ch. 1, § 4, p. 3 was repealed by S.L. 1984, ch. 195, § 1.

§ 40-405A. Apportionment of funds from highway distribution account to local units of government. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-405A, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405A, as added by 1980, ch. 164, § 2, p. 351, was repealed by S.L. 1984, ch. 195, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405A, as added by 1984, ch. 195, § 4, p. 445, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-709.

§ 40-405B. Creation of local bridge inspection account

Administration. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-405B, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405B, as added by 1980, ch. 164, § 3, p. 351, was repealed by S.L. 1984, ch. 195, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405B, as added by 1984, ch. 195, § 5, p. 445, was repealed by 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-703.

§ 40-405C. Apportionment of costs. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-405C, as added by 1980, ch. 164, § 4, p. 351, was repealed by S.L. 1984, ch. 195, § 1.

§ 40-406. Trust funds.

All moneys received relating to turnpike projects, whether as proceeds from the sale of bonds or as revenues, shall be deemed to be trust funds to be held and applied solely for turnpike projects. A resolution authorizing bonds of any issue or a trust agreement securing bonds shall provide that any officer with whom, or any bank or trust company with which, the moneys shall be deposited shall act as trustee of the money and shall hold and apply it for the purposes of the turnpike project, subject to the resolution or as a trust agreement may provide.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-406, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following former sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-406, 40-407. 1939, ch. 16, §§ 6, 7, p. 33.

40-408. 1939, ch. 16, § 8, p. 33; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 28, p. 61.

40-409. 1939, ch. 16, § 9, p. 33.

40-410, 40-411. 1943, ch. 136, §§ 1, 2, p. 273.

40-412. 1943, ch. 136, § 3, p. 273; 1945, ch. 122, § 1, p. 189.

§ 40-407. Remedy.

The only remedy available to any holder of bonds, or any of the coupons appertaining to them, and the trustee under any trust agreement, except to the extent the rights given may be restricted by a trust agreement, shall be to the particular turnpike project account and not against the state or any of its political subdivisions. A statement to this effect shall be printed on the face of all turnpike revenue bonds and any attached coupons.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-407, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-407 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

§ 40-408. Tax exemption — Turnpike projects.

The exercise of powers for turnpike projects shall be in all respects for the benefit of the people of the state, for the increase of their commerce and prosperity, and the improvement of turnpike projects by the board shall constitute the performance of essential governmental functions. The board shall not be required to pay any taxes or assessments upon any turnpike project or any property acquired or used by it relating to turnpike projects or upon the income from them, and any turnpike project and any property acquired or used by the board, and the income from them, and the bonds issued, their transfer and the income from them, including any profit made on the sale of them, shall be exempt from all taxation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-408, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-408 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

§ 40-409. Real property grants authorized — Annual report — Interest in contract penalized.

  1. Each turnpike project when constructed and opened to traffic shall be maintained and kept in good condition and repair by the board. Each project shall also be operated by tolltakers and other operating employees as the board may in its discretion employ. Nothing contained in this chapter shall in any way affect the regular duties prescribed for state and local police officers.
  2. All political subdivisions and all public departments, agencies and commissions of the state of Idaho, notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, are hereby authorized and empowered to lease, lend, grant or convey to the board at its request, upon terms and conditions as the proper authorities of political subdivisions and departments, agencies and commissions of the state deem reasonable and fair, and without the necessity for advertisement, order of a court or other action or formality, other than the regular and formal action of the authorities concerned, any real property which may be necessary or convenient to the effectuation of the authorized purposes of the board, including public highways and other real property already devoted to public use.
  3. On or before December 1 each year the board shall make an annual report of its activities for the preceding fiscal year relating to turnpike projects to the governor and to the legislature. Each report shall set forth a complete operating and financial statement covering its operations during the year. The board shall cause an audit of its books and accounts to be made as required in section 67-450B, Idaho Code, and the cost of audits shall be treated as a part of the cost of construction or of operation of the turnpike project.
  4. Any member, agent or employee of the board who is interested, either directly or indirectly, in any contract of another with the board, or in the sale of any property, either real or personal, to the board shall be guilty of a felony and punished by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or by both fine and imprisonment.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-409, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 387, § 9, p. 1417.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-409 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

§ 40-410. Tolls.

When all turnpike revenue bonds and the interest on them shall have been paid, or a sufficient amount for the payment of all bonds and the interest on them to the maturity of them, shall have been set aside for the benefit of bondholders, the board shall continue to use toll revenues as may be necessary to continue the turnpike project in satisfactory condition and repair.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-410, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-410 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

§ 40-411. Power to issue bonds — Credit of state not pledged.

  1. The board shall have power and is authorized to issue, from time to time its negotiable notes and bonds in conformity with the applicable provisions of the uniform commercial code and section 40-412, Idaho Code, in a principle [principal] amount as the board shall determine to be necessary for sufficient funds for achieving a turnpike project, establishing the reserves to secure the notes and bonds, and all other expenditures of the board incidental and necessary or convenient to carry out its powers for turnpike projects.
  2. Turnpike revenue bonds shall not be deemed to constitute a debt or liability of the state or of any political subdivision, or a pledge of the faith and credit of the state or of any political subdivision, but the bonds, unless refunded by bonds of the board, shall be payable solely from funds pledged or available for their payment. All turnpike revenue bonds and any coupons appertaining to those bonds shall contain on the face a statement to the effect that the board is obligated to pay the same, or the interest on them, only from the tolls, other revenue and proceeds of the bonds and that neither the state nor any political subdivision is obligated to pay the same or the interest on them, and that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the state or any political subdivision is pledged to the payment of the principal of or the interest on the bonds.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-411, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Uniform commercial code — negotiable instruments,§ 28-3-101 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-411 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (1) was added by the compiler to supply the probable intended word.

§ 40-412. Bonds of board as turnpike authority.

  1. The board is authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance of bonds of the board for any of its corporate purposes, including the refunding of its bonds. The principal of and the interest on any issue of bonds shall be payable solely from and may be secured by a pledge of tolls and other revenues of all or any part of the turnpike project financed in whole or in part with the proceeds of the issue or with the proceeds of bonds refunded or to be refunded by the issue. The proceeds of the bonds may be used or pledged for the payment or security of the principal of or interest on bonds and for the establishment of any or all reserves for payment or security, or for other corporate purposes as the board may authorize in the resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds or in a trust agreement securing them. The bonds of each issue shall be dated, shall bear interest at a rate, shall mature at a time not exceeding thirty (30) years from their date, as may be determined by the board and may be made redeemable before maturity, at the option of the board, at a price and under terms and conditions as may be fixed by the board prior to the issuance of the bonds. The board shall determine the form of the bonds including any interest coupons to be attached, and shall fix the denomination of the bonds and the place of payment of principal and interest, which may be at any bank or trust company within or without the state. The bonds shall be signed by the chairman of the board or shall bear his facsimile signature, and the official seal of the board or a facsimile shall be impressed, imprinted, engraved or otherwise reproduced on them. The official seal or facsimile shall be attested by the secretary of the board or by other officer or agent as the board shall appoint and authorize. Any coupons attached to the bonds shall bear the facsimile signature of the chairman of the board. In the event any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any bonds or coupons shall cease to be an officer before the delivery of the bonds, the signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he had remained in office until delivery. Bonds issued shall have and are declared to have all the qualifications and incidents of negotiable instruments. Bonds may be issued in coupon or in registered form, or both, as the board may determine, and provision may be made for the registration of any coupon bonds as to principal alone and also as to both principal and interest, and for the reconversion into coupon bonds of any bonds registered as to both principal and interest. The board may sell bonds in a manner and for a price, as it may determine to be for the best interest of the board. Neither the members of the board nor any person executing the bonds shall be personally liable on the bonds or be accountable by reason of the issuance of them.
  2. Proceeds of the bonds of each issue shall be disbursed in a manner and under restrictions, if any, as the board may provide in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or in a trust agreement securing them.
  3. Prior to the preparation of definitive bonds, the board may, under like restrictions, issue interim receipts or temporary bonds, with or without coupons, exchangeable for definitive bonds when those bonds shall have been executed and are available for delivery. The board may also provide for the replacement of any bonds which shall become mutilated or shall be destroyed or lost. Bonds may be issued without obtaining consent of any department, division, bureau, commission, board or agency of the state, and without any other proceedings or the happening of any other conditions or things than those proceedings, conditions or things which are specifically required.
  4. The state does agree with holders of bonds that the state will not limit or restrict rights hereby vested in the board to establish and collect charges and tolls as may be convenient or necessary to produce sufficient revenue to meet the expenses of maintenance and operation of a turnpike project and to fulfill the terms of any agreements made with holders of bonds, or in any way impair the rights or remedies or [of] holders of bonds until the bonds, together with interest are fully paid and discharged.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-412, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-412 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-406.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (4) was added by the compiler to supply the probable intended word.

§ 40-413. Trust agreement.

  1. In the discretion of the board any bonds issued may be secured by a trust agreement by and between the board and a corporate trustee, which may be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state. A trust agreement or resolution providing for the issuance of bonds, subject to the provisions of section 40-412, Idaho Code, may pledge or assign tolls or other revenues to which the board’s right then exists or may subsequently come into existence, and moneys derived from them, and the proceeds of the bonds, but shall not convey or mortgage any turnpike project or any part of it. A trust agreement or resolution providing for the issuance of bonds may contain provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and remedies of bondholders as may be reasonable and proper, and not in violation of law, including covenants setting forth the duties of the board in relation to the requisition of property and the construction, improvement, maintenance, repair, operation and insurance of a turnpike project or projects, the rates of tolls and revenues to be charged, the payment, security or redemption of bonds, and the custody, safeguarding and application of all moneys, and provisions for the employment of consulting engineers in connection with the construction or operation of a turnpike project or projects. It shall be lawful for any bank or trust company incorporated under the laws of the state which may act as depository of the proceeds of bonds or of revenues to furnish indemnifying bonds or to pledge any securities as may be required by the board. A trust agreement or resolution may set forth rights and remedies of bondholders and of the trustee, and may restrict individual rights of action by bondholders. In addition, a trust agreement or resolution may contain other provisions as the board may deem reasonable and proper for the security of bondholders. All expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of a trust agreement may be treated as a part of the cost of the operation of the turnpike project.
  2. Any pledge of tolls, other revenues, or other moneys made by the board shall be valid and binding from the time when the pledge is made. The tolls, other revenues, or other moneys pledged and subsequently received by the board shall immediately be subject to the lien of the pledge without any physical delivery or further act, and the lien of any pledge shall be valid and binding as against all parties having claims of any kind in tort, contract, or otherwise against the board, irrespective of whether the parties have notice of it.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-413, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-414. Refunding bonds.

The board is hereby authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance of refunding bonds of the board for the purpose of refunding any bonds then outstanding which shall have been issued, including the payment of any redemption premium and any interest accrued or to accrue to the date of redemption of the bonds, and, if deemed advisable by the board, for the additional purpose of constructing improvements, extensions, or enlargements of the turnpike project in connection with which the bonds to be refunded shall have been issued. The board is further authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance of its bonds for the purpose of refunding any bonds then outstanding which shall have been issued under the provisions of section 40-412, Idaho Code, including the payment of any redemption premium and any interest accrued or to accrue to the date of redemption of the bonds. The issuance of the bonds, the maturities and other details of them, the rights of the holders, and the rights, duties, and obligations of the board in respect of the bonds shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter insofar as they may be applicable.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-414, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

Chapter 5 IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

Sec.

§ 40-501. Transportation department.

An Idaho transportation department is established, and for the purposes of section 20, article IV of the constitution of the state of Idaho, is an executive department of state government. The department shall have as its head the Idaho transportation board, established by chapter 3, title 40, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-501, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-501, which comprised 1885, p. 162, § 17; R.S., § 870; am. 1890-1891, p. 190, § 1; am. 1893, p. 184, § 1; am. 1895, p. 143, § 1; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 1; am. 1901, p. 82, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 882; C.S., § 1312; am. 1921, ch. 161, § 3, p. 354; am. 1927, ch. 73, § 1, p. 91; I.C.A.,§ 39-401; am. 1943, ch. 88, § 1, p. 177, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

CASE NOTES

Cited

French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988); Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002).

Decisions Under Prior Law
In General.

The highway department (division of highways of the department of transportation) was an administrative department of the state government and, in the absence of consent or waiver of sovereign immunity by the legislature, neither the highway department (division of highways of the department of transportation) nor any of its officers or agents could subject the state to tort liability. Bare v. Department of Hwys., 88 Idaho 467, 401 P.2d 552 (1965).

§ 40-502. Maintenance of state highways.

All state highways shall be maintained by the department at state expense, including sections of state highways located within local highway jurisdictions, except that in local highway jurisdictions where state highway sections are built to local highway jurisdictions standards, such as with curbs, sidewalks and areas available for parking and bus stops, the department shall maintain at state expense only the width of traveled way required for the movement of through highway traffic. The width of traveled way to be maintained at state expense shall not exceed the width of the traveled way of the state highways approaching the incorporated areas.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-502, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 258, § 2, p. 858.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-502, which comprised S.L. 1907, p. 523, §§ 1, 2; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 822a; C.S., § 1313; I.C.A.§ 39-402, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Constitutionality.

Former law which, in effect, retroactively empowered the state to contract for construction of a subway was not unconstitutional as a special law authorizing invalid acts against the state. Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291, 53 P.2d 626 (1935).

Discretionary Authority.
Duty to Maintain Mandatory.

Former law that empowered the department of public works (division of public works of the department of administration) to improve, alter or extend any state highway theretofore constructed did not invest the commissioner of public works (administrator of the division of public works of the department of administration) and the director of highways with discretionary authority to refuse to maintain a section of the state highway, which had been constructed jointly by the state and a highway district within which it was located. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Merritt, 59 Idaho 603, 85 P.2d 685 (1938). Duty to Maintain Mandatory.

Mandamus would lie to compel the commissioners of public works (administrator of the division of public works of the department of administration) and director of highways (now administrator of the division of highways of the department of transportation) to maintain a portion of highway which had been constructed jointly with the state. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Merritt, 59 Idaho 603, 85 P.2d 685 (1938).

Limitation of Liability.

Highway district was not liable for collision between plaintiff’s truck and road grader negligently operated by state employees on highway maintained by state, wholly beyond the control of district. Smith v. Lewiston Hwy. Dist., 49 Idaho 506, 289 P. 996 (1930).

§ 40-503. Offices — Appointment — Qualifications — Compensation.

  1. An office of the director of the Idaho transportation department is established, and the board shall appoint a director having knowledge and experience in transportation matters. The director shall serve at the pleasure of the board. The director shall not hold any other public office, nor any office in any political committee or organization, and shall devote full time to the performance of his official duties. The director shall receive compensation as the board may determine and shall be reimbursed for all actual and necessary travel and expenses incurred by him in the discharge of his official duties, not to exceed a sum approved by the board. Subject to the approval of the board, the director shall appoint a chief engineer of the department who shall serve at the pleasure of the director and the board, and who shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code.
  2. An office of the chief engineer of the department is established, and the chief engineer shall be a registered professional engineer, holding a current certificate of registration in accordance with the laws of this state, or who, having those qualifications shall within nine (9) months after his appointment, qualify as a registered professional engineer in accordance with the laws of Idaho. The chief engineer shall also have had five (5) years of actual experience in highway engineering, at least three (3) of which shall have been in an administrative capacity involving the direction of a substantial technical engineering staff. The chief engineer shall not hold any other public office, nor any office in any political committee or organization, and shall devote full time to the performance of his official duties under the control and direction of the director. The chief engineer shall receive compensation and reimbursement for travel and expenses as may be established by the director.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-503, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2016, ch. 53, § 1, p. 149.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-503, which comprised R.C., § 882b, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 167; reen. C.L., § 882b; C.S., § 1314; I.C.A., 39-403; am. 1935 (2d E.S.), ch. 7, § 1, p. 15, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 53, deleted “and may be removed by the board for inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance or nonfeasance in office” at the end of the second sentence in subsection (1).

§ 40-504. Director — Bond.

Before entering upon the duties of his office, the director shall swear or affirm that he holds no other public office, nor any position under any political committee or organization. The affirmation shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state. The director shall be bonded to the state of Idaho in the time, form and manner prescribed by chapter 8, title 59, Idaho Code. The premium on the bond shall be a charge against the state, to be audited, allowed and paid as are other claims, out of the state highway and state aeronautics accounts.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-504, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State aeronautics fund,§ 21-211.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 5 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-504. C.L., § 882-B, as added by 1913, ch. 145, § 1, p. 511, reen. C.L., § 882c; C.S., § 1315; I.C.A.,§ 39-404.

40-505, 40-506. 1917, ch. 8, §§ 1, 2, p. 10; reen. 1919, ch. 158, part of § 1, p. 518; C.S., §§ 1316, 1317; I.C.A.,§§ 39-405, 39-406.

§ 40-505. Director — Duties and powers.

The director shall be the technical and administrative officer of the board and under the board’s control, supervision and direction, shall have general supervision and control of all activities, functions and employees of the department. He shall enforce all provisions of the laws of the state relating to the department, the rules and regulations of the board, and shall exercise all necessary incidental powers.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-505, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-505 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-504.

CASE NOTES

Power.

The director of the Idaho transportation board has the power to sign an order of condemnation on behalf of the board. State DOT v. HJ Grathol, 153 Idaho 87, 278 P.3d 957 (2012).

§ 40-506. Compensation for taking certain property.

  1. The department is authorized to acquire by purchase, gift or condemnation, all advertising displays and any property rights pertaining to them, when those advertising displays are required to be removed under the provisions of chapter 19, title 40, Idaho Code.
  2. In any appropriation for this purpose the department shall pay compensation under existing eminent domain law only for the following:
    1. The taking from the owner of a sign, display, or device of all right, title, leasehold, and interest in the sign, display or device; and
    2. The taking from the owner of the real property on which the sign, display, or device is located, of the right to erect and maintain signs, displays and devices on that property. Where setback easements restricting the erection of structures or advertising displays have been recorded by the state on land where those structures have been erected, the landowner of the land shall be deemed to have been fully compensated for them.
  3. In any action at law instituted by the department under this section the state shall not be required, as a prerequisite, to the taking of or appropriation to comply with section 7-704 2. or section 7-707 7., Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-506, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1997, ch. 156, § 2, p. 451; am. 2006, ch. 450, § 2, p. 1339.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-506 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-504.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 450, updated subsection references in subsection (3).

§ 40-507. Construction and maintenance of information centers.

  1. The department may design, erect, authorize, supervise and maintain information centers at safety rest areas in a number and at locations as it may determine to be necessary to meet the need of safety and effectively provide information of specific interest to the traveling public.
  2. Outdoor advertising placed within information centers shall be subject to all provisions of this title and all regulations promulgated by the board pursuant to the provisions of this title.
  3. Application for a permit to place outdoor advertising within an information center shall be made on a form prescribed by the department, and all permits shall be issued for a period of at least one (1) year. The department shall charge or authorize fees for the permit and for renewal sufficient to amortize the cost of the structure within an information center upon which the outdoor advertising is placed within the expected life of the structure, and sufficient to pay for the maintenance of the structure.
  4. The department will allow posters and signs to be placed by nonprofit anti-human trafficking organizations in or around safety rest areas. The posters and signs must be at least eight and one-half by eleven inches (8 ½′′ x 11′′) in size, must be mounted as tamper and vandalism resistant, and must contain toll-free telephone numbers and/or emergency contact numbers for victims of human trafficking, including the number for the “National Human Trafficking Resource Center” and the number for the Idaho state office of crime victims advocacy. The posters and signs may include text in a variety of languages. The posters and signs will be covered by a permit if the safety rest area or turnout is part of the highway right-of-way. Posters and signs containing the aforementioned contact numbers shall have all costs for the sign, installation, and/or maintenance provided by the aforementioned nonprofit anti-human trafficking organization(s). Temporary installation permits can include a memorandum of understanding (MOU), and encroachment permit, or a special event permit. The cost of poster and sign installment and maintenance shall be covered in the permit or MOU normally at the expense of the requestor.
  5. As used in subsection (4) of this section:
    1. “Emergency contact numbers” means a hotline that is: available twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week; toll-free; operated by a nonprofit, nongovernmental organization; anonymous and confidential; and able to provide help, referral to services, training and general information;
    2. “Human trafficking” means the illegal movement of people, typically for the purposes of forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation;
    3. “Safety rest area” means a roadside area with restrooms and other facilities for the use of motorists.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-507, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2015, ch. 207, § 1, p. 635.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 5 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1950, ch. 87, § 24, p. 117:

40-507. 1885, p. 162, § 17; R.S., § 871; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 883; C.S., § 1318; I.C.A.,§ 39-407.

40-509. 1897, p. 78,§§ 1-5; reen. 1899, p. 306,§§ 1-5; reen. R.C., § 884; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 161; am. 1912, ch. 9, § 1, p. 45; reen. C.L., § 884; am. 1919, ch. 105, p. 371; C.S., § 1320; I.C.A.,§ 39-409.

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 207, added subsections (4) and (5).

Compiler’s Notes.

The “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2015, ch. 207 declared an emergency. Approved April 1, 2015.

§ 40-508. Traffic safety commission created — Membership.

  1. An Idaho traffic safety commission is established within the department.
  2. The commission shall be composed of not more than fifteen (15) members appointed by the director, who shall include the chairman of the transportation and defense committee of the house of representatives of the state and the chairman of the transportation committee of the senate of the state, plus the director or his representative who shall act as chairman. Members shall be representative of state and local traffic oriented agencies, the legislature, the judiciary, and private organizations and citizen groups.
  3. The director shall employ necessary personnel, shall have general supervision and control of all activities, functions and employees, and shall enforce all provisions of the laws of the state relating to highway safety programs and administer any other activities as may be required by the federal highway safety act of 1966 and any amendments to it, and the rules and regulations of the board pertaining to it.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-508, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-508 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-507.

Federal References.

The federal highway safety act of 1966, referred to in subsection (3), is P.L. 89-564, which is codified as 23 USCS §§ 105, 307, and 401 to 404.

§ 40-509. Duties of traffic safety commission.

The commission shall:

  1. Periodically review traffic safety problems in Idaho and develop effective plans for additional local-state cooperative activities;
  2. Recommend to the director those agency programs and political subdivision programs to receive federal aid for highway safety in accordance with uniform federal standards;
  3. Advise and recommend to the director future traffic accident prevention activities; and
  4. Carry out any other activities as may be required by the federal highway safety act of 1966 and any amendments to it.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-509, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-509 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-507.

Federal References.

The federal highway safety act of 1966, referred to in subsection (4), is P.L. 89-564, which is codified as 23 USCS §§ 105, 307, and 401 to 404.

§ 40-510. Ports of entry or checking stations established — Motor vehicle investigator activities — Authority of the board to employ individuals.

  1. To augment and help make more efficient and effective the enforcement of certain laws of the state of Idaho, the Idaho transportation department is hereby authorized and directed to establish from time to time temporary or permanent ports of entry or checking stations upon any highways in the state of Idaho, at such places as the Idaho transportation department shall deem necessary and advisable.
  2. The board is authorized to appoint and employ individuals who shall have limited peace officer authority for the enforcement of such motor vehicle-related laws as are herein specified:
    1. Sections 18-3906 and 18-8001, Idaho Code;
    2. Sections 25-1105 and 25-1182(2), Idaho Code;
    3. Sections 40-510 through 40-512, Idaho Code;
    4. Chapters 1 through 5, 9, 10, 15 through 19, 22 and 24, title 49, sections 49-619, 49-660, 49-1407, 49-1418 and 49-1427 through 49-1430, Idaho Code;
    5. Authorized use of motor fuel on the highways and international fuel tax agreement (IFTA) provisions of chapter 24, title 63, Idaho Code;
    6. Section 67-2901A, Idaho Code; and
    7. Sections 49-676 and 63-2425, Idaho Code.
  3. Motor vehicle investigators shall have the authority to access confidential vehicle identification number information.
  4. Any employee so appointed shall have the authority to issue misdemeanor traffic citations in accordance with the provisions of section 49-1409, Idaho Code, and infraction citations in accordance with the provisions of chapter 15, title 49, Idaho Code.
  5. No employee of the department shall carry or use a firearm of any type in the performance of his duties unless specifically authorized in writing by the director of the Idaho state police to do so.
  6. The board is authorized to extend the authority as provided in this section to authorized employees of contiguous states upon approval of a bilateral agreement according to the provisions of section 40-317, Idaho Code.
History.

1950 (E.S.), ch. 15, § 1, p. 26; am. 1953, ch. 218, § 1, p. 333; am. 1974, ch. 27, § 193, p. 811; am. 1982, ch. 95, § 140, p. 185; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 288, § 6, p. 739; am. 1999, ch. 383, § 2, p. 1051; am. 2000, ch. 303, § 1, p. 1034; am. 2000, ch. 469, § 103, p. 1450; am. 2006, ch. 31, § 1, p. 94; am. 2015, ch. 38, § 17, p. 79; am. 2020, ch. 327, § 5, p. 943.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of Idaho state police,§ 67-2901.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-510, which comprised 1890-1891, p. 190, § 2; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 2; reen. R.C., § 885; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 161; am. 1917, ch. 88, p. 310; reen. C.L., § 885; C.S., § 1321; I.C.A.,§ 39-410, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st. E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2000 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 303, § 1 added subdivision (2)(f).

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 469, § 103, near the end of subsection (5), substituted “Idaho state police” for “department of law enforcement”.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 31, substituted “40-512” for “40-514” in subsection (2)(c).

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 38, in paragraph (2)(d), deleted “11” preceding “15 through 19”; and rewrote paragraph (2)(e), which formerly read: “Sections 63-2438, 63-2440, 63-2441 and 63-2443, Idaho Code; and”.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 327, added paragraph (2)(g).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 67-2926.

The abbreviation enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 303 declared an emergency. Approved April 14, 2000.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Hahn, 92 Idaho 265, 441 P.2d 714 (1968).

§ 40-511. Stopping and inspection.

  1. Wherever by the laws of the state of Idaho any vehicle with a maximum gross weight or registered gross weight, or operated at a gross weight of twenty-six thousand one (26,001) pounds or more, excepting those transporting livestock or placardable quantities of hazardous materials, is used to transport any merchandise, product or commodity within the state, within the state to without the state, or from without the state to within the state, the owner or operator of either the motor vehicle or trailer, as defined in chapter 1, title 49, Idaho Code, used to transport such merchandise, product or commodity is hereby required to stop at such ports of entry or checking stations established by the Idaho transportation department and submit to inspection, grading or weighing, for compliance with the laws of the state of Idaho.
  2. Vehicles or combinations of vehicles with a maximum gross weight of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more transporting livestock or placardable quantities of hazardous materials are required to stop at all ports of entry or checking stations established by the Idaho transportation department.
  3. It shall be the duty of such owner or operator of every motor vehicle or trailer to drive the motor vehicle or trailer upon any state owned stationary or portable scale or private scale, certified by the state of Idaho when requested to do so by any peace officer, excepting fish and game officers, or authorized employees of the Idaho transportation department.
  4. Authorized employees of the transportation department may stop any vehicle with a maximum gross weight of eighteen thousand (18,000) pounds or more by displaying a flashing red light if the authorized employee has probable cause to believe the vehicle bypassed a weighing or inspection station or proceeded through the station without regard for the directional signals. Authorized employees may direct a vehicle which has bypassed a weighing or inspection station or has proceeded through the station without regard for the directional signals, to return to the bypassed inspection or weighing station and may issue a citation for failure to stop as required in this section. The operator of a vehicle shall bring the vehicle to a stop, pulling off the traveled portion of the highway when directed to do so by an authorized employee of the transportation department by use of emergency lights or siren.
History.

1950 (E.S.), ch. 15, § 2, p. 26; am. 1970, ch. 54, § 1, p. 133; am. 1974, ch. 27, § 194, p. 811; am. 1982, ch. 95, § 141, p. 185; am. 1988, ch. 265, § 583, p. 549; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 288, § 7, p. 739; am. 1992, ch. 111, § 1, p. 340; am. 1997, ch. 233, § 1, p. 682; am. 1999, ch. 393, § 1, p. 1091; am. 2006, ch. 31, § 2, p. 94.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-511, which comprised 1899, p. 392, § 1; reen. R.C., § 886; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 161; reen. C.L., § 886; C.S., § 1322; I.C.A.,§ 39-411, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st. E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 31, inserted “or registered gross weight, or operated at a gross weight” near the beginning of subsection (1).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 67-2927.

Effective Dates.

Section 586 of S.L. 1988, ch. 265 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 1989.

§ 40-512. Penalties.

Any person failing to stop at any port of entry or checking station when so required by the provisions of section 40-511, Idaho Code, or, failing to submit to the inspection, grading or weighing required by any law of the state of Idaho, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History.

1950 (E.S.), ch. 15, § 3, p. 26; am. 1970, ch. 54, § 2, p. 133; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 288, § 8, p. 739.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-512, which comprised R.S., § 874; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 887; C.S., § 1323; I.C.A.,§ 39-412, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st. E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 67-2928.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Hahn, 92 Idaho 265, 441 P.2d 714 (1968).

§ 40-513. Veterans memorial centennial bridge established.

The Bennett Bay bridge located on interstate highway I-90 in Kootenai county shall be designated as the “Veterans Memorial Centennial Bridge” to honor those persons who served in the armed forces during periods of wartime as defined by congress. The transportation department shall erect suitable signs so designating the bridge as the veterans memorial centennial bridge.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513, as added by 1992, ch. 105, § 1, p. 326.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-513, which comprised, (R.C., § 887a, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 168; reen. C.L., § 887a; C.S., § 1324; I.C.A.,§ 39-413), was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st. E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

§ 40-513A. Designation of the I.B. Perrine Bridge.

The bridge spanning the Snake River Canyon on U.S. Highway 93 south of Interstate Highway 84 near the city of Twin Falls, Idaho, shall be designated as the “I.B. Perrine Bridge” to honor I.B. Perrine for his part as founder and father of the Twin Falls area. His dream for agriculture and his efforts to bring water to the valley set in motion the development we see today. The transportation department shall erect suitable signs so designating the bridge as the “I.B. Perrine Bridge.”

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513A, as added by 2000, ch. 197, § 1, p. 488.

§ 40-513B. Portion of U.S. Highway 95 designated as Stu Dopf Memorial Highway.

That portion of United States Highway 95 through the canyon between Midvale and Cambridge shall be known and designated as the “Stu Dopf Memorial Highway” in honor of the journalist who was interested in increasing the ease and safety of travel along U.S. Highway 95. The Idaho transportation department shall identify areas suitable for posting markers along that portion of U.S. Highway 95 indicating its designation as the Stu Dopf Memorial Highway.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513B, as added by 2001, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1234.

§ 40-513C. Designation of purple heart trail.

That portion of interstate highway I-90 located in Idaho is the Idaho portion of the national purple heart trail. The Idaho transportation department shall design and construct signs indicating the highway number, the designation as the purple heart trail, and any other appropriate information. The department shall erect a sign at each end of the highway and markers at intermediate sites along the highway that the department determines are appropriate. The department is required to design, construct, and erect the signs and markers only to the extent that moneys are provided for this purpose through private donations, grants, awards or other moneys.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513C, as added by 2008, ch. 215, § 1, p. 671.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on national purple heart trail, see http://www.purpleheart.org/PHtrail/Default. aspx .

§ 40-513D. State highway 3 designated as North Idaho Medal of Honor Highway.

State highway 3, connecting U.S. highway 12 near Spalding with interstate 90 near Rose Lake, shall be designated as the “North Idaho Medal of Honor Highway” to honor Idahoans awarded the congressional medal of honor for their service in our armed forces. The Idaho transportation department shall identify areas suitable for posting markers along state highway 3 indicating its designation as the “North Idaho Medal of Honor Highway.”

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513D, as added by 2011, ch. 48, § 1, p. 114.

§ 40-513E. Designation of Vietnam veterans memorial highway.

That portion of interstate highway I-84 located in Idaho is designated as the Vietnam veterans memorial highway. The Idaho transportation department shall design and construct signs indicating the highway number, the designation as the Vietnam veterans memorial highway and any other appropriate information. The department shall erect a sign at each end of the highway and markers at intermediate sites along the highway that the department determines are appropriate. The department is required to design, construct and erect the signs and markers only to the extent that moneys are provided for this purpose through private donations, grants, awards or other moneys.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513E, as added by 2014, ch. 19, § 1, p. 26.

§ 40-513F. Designation of the Idaho medal of honor highway.

That portion of U.S. highway 20 located in Idaho shall also be known as the “Idaho Medal of Honor Highway.” The Idaho transportation department shall design and construct signs indicating the designation as the “Idaho Medal of Honor Highway” and any other appropriate information. The department shall erect a sign at each end of the highway and markers at intermediate sites along the highway that the department determines are appropriate. The department is required to design, construct, and erect the signs and markers only to the extent that less than thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) of existing dedicated funds are provided for this purpose as determined by the transportation board. Design of the signs should be similar to the signs currently erected on U.S. highway 20 at the time of enactment of this legislation. Signs shall identify the highway as the “Idaho Medal of Honor Highway” and include the three (3) different designs of the medal of honor.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-513F, as added by 2019, ch. 65, § 1, p. 157.

§ 40-514. Public transportation services — Public transportation services advisory council created — Interagency working group created — Department support.

  1. All state agencies except the department of education, and all public entities that use public funds to provide public transportation services within the state shall report not less often than semiannually to the department the amount of funding expended, audits conducted, the number of passengers carried, the agency vehicles used and the vehicle miles driven to provide transportation for Idaho citizens. Upon receipt of such information, the department shall:
    1. Develop a uniform data collection and reporting system; information from said system shall be submitted annually to the joint finance-appropriations committee of the Idaho legislature; and as public information, it shall also be available upon request;
    2. In cooperation with other state agencies and public entities, develop a comprehensive plan for public transportation; and
    3. Provide assistance to operators of local and regional transportation systems that are consistent with public program objectives of the state plan.
  2. There is hereby created the public transportation advisory council to advise the Idaho transportation department on issues and policies regarding public transportation in Idaho. The council shall participate in planning activities, identify transportation needs, and promote coordinated transportation systems. Before setting programs and priorities, the council shall seek pertinent information, facts and data from local governments, agencies and providers regarding rural public transportation issues.
  3. The director of the Idaho transportation department together with the directors of the affected state agencies shall establish an interagency working group to advise and assist the department in analyzing public transportation needs, identifying areas for coordination, and developing strategies for eliminating procedural and regulatory barriers to coordination at the state level. The group shall undertake detailed work assignments related to transportation services which promote cooperation and collaboration among systems. The working group shall be composed of a representative from the office of the governor and one (1) staff representative from each of the following agencies which expend public funds for transportation services or associations representing public transportation interests:
    1. Idaho commission on aging;
    2. Idaho head start association;
    3. Two (2) representatives from the Idaho department of health and welfare, one (1) of whom shall represent the division of medicaid;
    4. Idaho department of education;
    5. Idaho transportation department;
    6. Community transportation association;
    7. Idaho council on developmental disabilities;
    8. Division of vocational rehabilitation; and
    9. Idaho department of labor, workforce development council.
  4. The interagency working group established in subsection (3) of this section shall:
    1. Meet at least once in each calendar quarter; and
    2. Discuss all agenda items submitted to it by any member of the group; and
    3. Provide notice of each meeting at least two (2) weeks in advance of the meeting; and
    4. Annually elect a chairman from among its members; such person shall not serve consecutive terms as chairman.
  5. The department shall provide the administrative support required by the council and the interagency working group.

The advisory council shall be composed of six (6) members appointed by the Idaho transportation board. Appointed members shall be representatives of local governments and agencies, private organizations, citizen groups and private providers that have an interest in public transportation, and people with disabilities and the elderly who utilize public transportation. The board shall appoint said members from recommendations submitted by said organizations, groups, providers, users and state agencies in each district. One (1) member shall be appointed from each of the six (6) transportation department director districts as provided in section 40-303, Idaho Code. The term of each member shall be three (3) years and the initial appointments to the council shall be such that two (2) members shall be appointed each year thereafter.

The council is authorized to meet three (3) times per year with additional meetings as authorized by the board.

Members of the advisory council shall be reimbursed according to the provisions of section 59-509(g), Idaho Code.

Ex officio members may be appointed to the group as deemed necessary. Members of the working group representing state agencies shall be reimbursed by their respective agencies according to the provisions of section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-514, as added by 1992, ch. 149, § 4, p. 447; am. 1996, ch. 35, § 2, p. 88; am. 2000, ch. 417, § 2, p. 1328.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Commission on aging,§ 67-5001 et seq.

Department of education,§ 33-125.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

State council on developmental disabilities,§ 67-6701 et seq.

Workforce development council,§ 72-1336.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-514, which comprised R.C. § 887b, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 169; reen. C.L. § 887b; C.S. § 1325; I.C.A.,§ 39-414, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on Idaho head start association, see http://idahoheadstartassoc.net . For more on medicaid in Idaho, see http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov / ?Tabid= 123 .

For more on community transportation association of Idaho, see http://ctai.org .

For more on Idaho division of vocational rehabilitation, see https://vr.idaho.gov/ .

§ 40-515 — 40-520. Highway condition report — Financial condition report — Contracts for repair of highways — Contractor’s duties — Failure to perform — Allowance of contractor’s claims. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 5 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-515. R.C., § 887c, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 169; reen. C.L., § 887c; C.S., § 1326; I.C.A.,§ 39-415; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 29, p. 61.

40-516. R.C., § 887d, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 169; reen. C.L., § 887d; C.S., § 1327; I.C.A.,§ 39-416.

40-517. 1893, p. 184, § 2; am. 1895, p. 22, § 1; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 3; am. 1907, p. 163, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 888; C.S., § 1328; I.C.A.,§ 39-417.

40-518. 1893, p. 184, § 2; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 16; am. 1907, p. 163, § 2; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 889; C.S., § 1329; I.C.A.,§ 39-418.

40-519. 1893, p. 184, § 2; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 16; am. 1907, p. 163, § 2; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 890; C.S., § 1330; I.C.A.,§ 39-419.

40-520. 1893, p. 184, § 2; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 16; am. 1907, p. 163, § 2; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 891; C.S., § 1331; I.C.A.,§ 39-420.

§ 40-521. Collection of poll tax in contract districts. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised S.L. 1893, p. 184, § 2; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 16; am. 1907, p. 163, § 2; reen., R.C. & C.L., § 892; C.S., § 1332; I.C.A.,§ 39-421, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

§ 40-522 — 40-527. Every city a road district — Powers and duties of city council or board of trustees — Sign posts, erection — Penalty for defacing or destroying — County and district boards — Cooperation with state — Sidewalks or side paths — Curb construction standards — Curb ramps for the physically handicapped. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 5 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-522. 1885, p. 162, § 43; R.S., § 887; am. 1895, p. 132, § 1; reen. 1899, p. 270, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 893; C.S., § 1333; I.C.A.,§ 39-422.

40-523. 1917, ch. 95, § 1, p. 326; reen. C.L., § 893a; C.S., § 1334; I.C.A.,§ 39-423.

40-524. 1917, ch. 95, § 2, p. 327; compiled and reen. C.L., § 893b; C.S., § 1335; I.C.A.,§ 39-424; am. 1950 (E.S.), ch. 87, § 22, p. 117; am. 1951, ch. 161, § 1, p. 356; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 30, p. 61.

40-525. 1923, ch. 181, § 1, p. 281; I.C.A.,§ 39-425; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 31, p. 61.

40-526. I.C.A.,§ 39-426, as added by 1939, ch. 112, § 1, p. 190; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 32, p. 61.

40-527. I.C.,§ 40-527, as added by 1975, ch. 210, § 1, p. 582.

§ 40-528. Federal transit administration authority.

  1. The Idaho transportation department and its director are the designated recipients for the federal transit administration funding for the rural transit program and the small urban transit program within the state of Idaho.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section:
    1. The department is not the designated recipient for large urbanized areas as determined and defined by the United States department of commerce, bureau of the census; and
    2. The department is not the designated recipient for any qualifying urbanized area identified by the governor prior to July 1, 2011.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-528, as added by 2012, ch. 22, § 1, p. 77; am. 2015, ch. 244, § 24, p. 1008.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 244, corrected a punctuation error at the end of paragraph (2)(a).

Chapter 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND HIGHWAY OFFICERS

Sec.

§ 40-601. Districts established by commissioners.

Whenever the commissioners of any county shall have caused to be described by an order made and entered upon its records any defined portion of contiguous territory, located wholly within the county, for the construction, improvement or repair of highways pursuant to the provisions of law, each defined portion of contiguous territory is recognized as a legal taxing district and body politic of this state and as a highway district for highway purposes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-601, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-601, which comprised 1885, p. 162, § 20; R.S., § 880; am. 1901, p. 297, § 1; reen. R.C., § 894; am. 1911, ch. 44, §§ 1, 2, p. 101; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 894, p. 162; am. 1912, ch. 4, § 1, p. 8; am. 1915, ch. 52, p. 139; reen. C.L., § 894; am. 1919, ch. 185, p. 566; reen. C.S., § 1336; I.C.A.,§ 39-501, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-602. Boundaries.

The boundaries of each highway district shall be the same as are described by metes and bounds or other legal description upon the minutes or records of the commissioners of the respective county and upon copies of those records duly certified.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-602, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-602, which comprised R.S., § 881; reen. R.C., § 895; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 895, p. 162; am. 1912, ch. 9, § 2, p. 46; reen. C.L., § 895; C.S., § 1337; I.C.A.,§ 39-502, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-603. County highways recommended by commissioners — Approved by board.

The commissioners of each county shall recommend highways for the county highway system to the board at least once a year and in a manner and form to be prescribed by the board. All recommendations shall clearly show which highways are improved highways and which are unimproved. All recommendations must be approved by the board before they shall constitute the official highway system of the county. The board may require commissioners to submit financial and operating data as it may deem necessary to assist it in determining what highways should properly be included in the respective county highway systems.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-603, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 6, p. 803.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-603, which comprised R.S., § 882; reen. R.C., § 896; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 162; reen. C.L., § 896; C.S., § 1338; am. 1921, ch. 161, § 4, p. 354; I.C.A.,§ 39-503, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

§ 40-604. Duties and powers of commissioners.

Commissioners shall:

  1. Exercise general supervision over all highways in the county highway system, including their location, design, construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance, and develop general policies regarding highway matters.
  2. Cause to be surveyed, viewed, laid out, recorded, opened and worked, any highways or public rights-of-way as are necessary for public convenience under the provisions of sections 40-202 and 40-203A, Idaho Code.
  3. Cause to be recorded all highways and public rights-of-way within their highway system.
  4. Have authority to abandon and vacate any highway or public right-of-way within their highway system under the provisions of section 40-203, Idaho Code.
  5. Designate county highways, or parts of them, as controlled-access highways and regulate, restrict or prohibit access to those highways so as best to serve the traffic for which the facility is intended.
  6. Have authority to make agreements with any incorporated city, other county, a highway district, the state, or the United States, its agencies, departments, bureaus, boards, or any government owned corporation for the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of the county’s highway system by those entities or for the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of the highway systems of those entities by the county’s highway organization. The county shall compensate or be compensated for the fair cost of the work except as otherwise specifically provided in this title.
  7. Contract, purchase, or otherwise acquire the right-of-way over private property for the use of county highways and for this purpose may institute proceedings under the code of civil procedure.
  8. Levy an ad valorem tax to be paid into the county highway fund and cause the tax collected each year to be paid into that fund and kept by the treasurer as a separate fund. When all of the territory of a county is included in one (1) or more highway districts the commissioners shall not make any levy for general highway purposes.
  9. Audit and draw warrants on the county highway fund required for payment for rights-of-way improvement.
  10. Rename any highway within the county, excepting those situated within the territorial limits of incorporated cities, when the renaming will eradicate confusion.
  11. Cause guide posts properly inscribed to be erected and maintained on designated highways.
  12. Exercise other powers as may be prescribed by law.

[(13)](14) By July 1, 2000, and every five (5) years thereafter, the commissioners shall have published in map form and made readily available the location of all public rights-of-way under their jurisdiction. The commissioners of a district may be granted an extension of time with approval of the legislature by adoption of a concurrent resolution.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-604, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 7, p. 803; am. 1988, ch. 117, § 1, p. 215; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 7, p. 1505; am. 1998, ch. 154, § 1, p. 528; am. 1998, ch. 184, § 2, p. 673.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-604, which comprised R.S., § 883; reen. R.C., § 897; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 163; reen. C.L. § 897; C.S., § 1339; I.C.A.,§ 39-504, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1998 acts — ch. 154, § 1 and ch. 184, § 2, both effective July 1, 1998, which do not conflict and have been compiled together. However, the two acts added and redesignated subsections differently. The compiler has attempted to resolve these differences by letting stand the deletion of subsection (7) of ch. 154 and the accompanying redesignations of subsections (8) through (13) as subsections (7) through (12) and bracketing the addition of subsection (14) by ch. 184 as subsection [(13)].

The 1998 amendment, by ch. 154, § 1, deleted former subdivision (7), which read, “Let out by contract the improvement of highways, the construction and repair of bridges or other adjuncts to highways, when the amount of work to be done by contract exceeds five hundred dollars ($500). At least twenty-five percent (25%) of the fund collected in any highway division must be expended within the division in which the fund was collected,” redesignated the remaining subdivisions accordingly, inserted “(1)” in present subdivision (8), and hyphenated “right-of-way” throughout the section.

The 1998 amendment, by ch. 184, § 2, in subdivision (8), inserted “(1),” added subdivision (14) (now [(13)]), and hyphenated “right-of-way” throughout the section.

CASE NOTES

Abandonment of Highway.

Because§ 40-1614 does not contain the requirement of a finding that a road is in the “public interest,” the interpretation of§ 40-1614 is not binding on subsection (4) of this section and the requirement of formal action by means of a finding; thus, the court rejected property owners’ argument that§ 40-1614 supported a valid abandonment of a road by a county when it rejected a request for maintenance of the road. Farrell v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 378, 64 P.3d 304 (2002), overruled on other grounds, City of Osburn v. Randel, 152 Idaho 906, 277 P.3d 353 (2012).

County had not abandoned a road by formal action, pursuant to§ 40-501, even though the road was not identified as part of the county road system, because an action where the city rejected a claim to maintain the road did not amount to a finding, as required by subsection (4), that the abandonment of the road was in the public interest. Farrell v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 378, 64 P.3d 304 (2002), overruled on other grounds, City of Osburn v. Randel, 152 Idaho 906, 277 P.3d 353 (2012).

Cited French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988); Bingham v. Franklin County, 118 Idaho 318, 796 P.2d 527 (1990); Schneider v. Howe, 142 Idaho 767, 133 P.3d 1232 (2006). Decisions Under Prior Law
Abandonment of Bridges.

Abandonment of a bridge must have been by ordinance, which in this context means some formal action. Nicolaus v. Bodine, 92 Idaho 639, 448 P.2d 645 (1968).

Abandonment of Highway.

An abandonment of the original site of a highway constituted an abandonment of the site of the highway actually used which had been little used and was not kept in repair. Kootenai County v. Kinman, 56 Idaho 1, 47 P.2d 887 (1935).

Acceptance and Use as Highway.

Where in an action by plaintiff residents of any unincorporated area of a county to have certain roads declared public highways and to require the county to maintain the roads, the evidence showed that the county had regularly maintained the roads for approximately nine years, that the roads had been extensively used by the general public, and that the sales of several lots within the area had been made with particular reliance upon several written representations made by various members of the board of county commissioners that the roads would be maintained by the county, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the county because a substantial fact issue existed as to whether the county had accepted the roads. Pugmire v. Johnson, 102 Idaho 882, 643 P.2d 832 (1982).

Acquisition of Lands.

A county had plenary power to acquire lands for highway purposes by purchase as well as by condemnation. Bel v. Benewah County, 60 Idaho 791, 97 P.2d 397 (1939).

Cost of Improvements.

Ordinary and usual expense of keeping roads and bridges in repair cannot be paid out of a bond issue, but expense of a systematic improvement of roads and bridges may be paid out of a bond issue. Independent Hwy. Dist. No. 2 v. Ada County, 24 Idaho 416, 134 P. 542 (1913).

Crops, County Liable for Destruction.

Where a county agreed, as part of consideration to acquire highway lands, to construct fences, and the agreement required such construction prior to the building of the highway, which the county failed to do, such failure constituted a violation of the contract and made the county liable to the vendor for crops destroyed by animals entering in upon his premises as a result of the failure to construct the fences. Bel v. Benewah County, 60 Idaho 791, 97 P.2d 397 (1939).

Levy of Road Tax.

General levy for roads should be estimated and determined by commissioners, and their action was not subject to review in a proceeding for contempt for failure to obey writ of mandate. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 29 Idaho 516, 160 P. 260 (1916).

Liability for Torts.

The fact that former law made all highway districts agents of the state did not thereby render them immune from liability for torts. Mason v. Hillsdale Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 833, 154 P.2d 490 (1944).

Liability of Commissioners.

County commissioners were not individually liable for injuries sustained by reason of defective highways. Worden v. Witt, 4 Idaho 404, 39 P. 1114 (1895); Youmans v. Thornton, 31 Idaho 10, 168 P. 1141 (1917).

Payment of Proceeds to Municipality.

Where town or village is a separate road district, twenty-five per cent (25%) of money realized on property road tax levied by county commissioners on property in such town or village must be turned over to said town or village to be expended by town or village authorities. City of Genesee v. Latah County, 4 Idaho 141, 36 P. 701 (1894).

Municipality need not put in a claim for the percentage of road tax which should be paid to it, but such percentage should be paid without claim being made. Village of Mountainhome v. Elmore County, 9 Idaho 410, 75 P. 65 (1904).

Street Naming and Numbering.

Since the purposes of the Local Planning Act (§ 67-6501 et seq.) and the duties of those charged with its administration are closely related to the planning and zoning functions that have been the domain of cities and counties, since of necessity these functions transcend the boundaries of local special purpose districts, since former law was amended to add to the duties of the county commissioners the duty to rename streets and highways within the county by proper ordinance, since§§ 50-1301 — 50-1329 governing the filing of subdivision plats provide that all plats must be presented to the proper governing body of a city and/or county for approval and each plat must show all the streets and have them named, since nothing in the Planning Act suggests a legislative intent for the planning and standard setting of the act in respect to highways to flow to highway districts by reason of the language of former law that provided for general powers and duties of board of county commissioners and since§ 67-6501 et seq. were enacted after§§ 40-1611 and 40-1615, the Local Planning Act gives a county the authority to set standards for street naming and address numbering within the boundaries of a local highway district. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Kootenai County, 104 Idaho 833, 663 P.2d 1135 (Ct. App. 1983).

Vacancies in Office.

Board of county commissioners have appointive power to fill office of road overseer when it becomes vacant. Meservey v. Gulliford, 14 Idaho 133, 93 P. 780 (1908); Grice v. Clearwater Timber Co., 20 Idaho 70, 117 P. 112 (1911).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

40 C.J.S., Highways, § 375 et seq.

ALR.

§ 40-605. Laying out of new highways — Widening, changing, or straightening existing highways — Purchase of rights-of-way by agreement.

Commissioners may lay out new highways within the county as they determine to be necessary. The right-of-way of any highway shall not be less than fifty (50) feet wide, except in exceptional cases. Commissioners may also change the width or location or straighten lines of any highway under their jurisdiction. If, in the laying out, widening, changing or straightening of any highway it shall become necessary to take private property, the commissioners or their director of highways shall cause a survey of the proposed highway to be made, together with an accurate description of the lands required. The commissioners shall endeavor to agree with each owner for the purchase of a right-of-way over his land included within the description. If they are able to agree with the owner, the commissioners may purchase the land out of the county highway fund under their control, and the land shall then be conveyed to the county for the use and purpose of highways.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-605, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-605, which comprised R.S., § 886; am. 1890-1891, p. 190, § 3; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 4; reen. R.C., § 900; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 900, p. 163; am. 1913, ch. 155, p. 524; reen. C.L., § 900; C.S., § 1340; am. 1921, ch. 161, § 2, p. 354; am. 1929, ch. 90, § 1, p. 147; I.C.A.,§ 39-505, was repealed by S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 29.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Procedure in Establishing Highways.

In order that act of county commissioners in laying out highway be valid, whether upon public domain or private property, board must conform to law giving such authority, as power to establish highways rests in legislature and right may be exercised only in such manner as legislature provides. Gooding Hwy. Dist. v. Idaho Irrigation Co., 30 Idaho 232, 164 P. 99 (1917).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.
ALR.

§ 40-606. Condemnation of rights-of-way.

  1. Whenever the commissioners or their director of highways shall be unable to agree with any person for a parcel of land, or the person shall be unknown or a nonresident of the county, or a minor, or an insane or incompetent person, the commissioners or director of highways shall have the right, subject in case of the director of highways on the order of the commissioners, to begin action in the name of the county in the district court to condemn the land necessary for the right-of-way for the highway under the provisions of chapter 7, title 7, Idaho Code. An order of the commissioners, entered upon their minutes, that the land sought to be condemned is necessary for a public highway and public use shall be prima facie evidence of the fact.
  2. Any lands classified as omitted lands under federal legislation shall be governed by the provisions of section 7-704A, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-606, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 6 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-606. 1901, p. 78, § 1; am. 1907, p. 572, § 1; reen. R.C., § 901; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 901, p. 163; am. 1912, ch. 11, § 1, p. 47; am. 1913, ch. 153, p. 522; reen. C.L., § 901; C.S., § 1341; I.C.A.,§ 39-506.

40-607. 1901, p. 78, § 2; am. 1907, p. 572, § 2; am. R.C., § 902; reen. C.L., § 902; C.S., § 1342; I.C.A.,§ 39-507.

40-608. 1901, p. 78, § 5; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 905; C.S., § 1343; I.C.A.,§ 39-508.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

27 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, § 414 et seq.

C.J.S.
ALR.

§ 40-607. County and highway district highway system construction, maintenance and right-of-way costs borne by the responsible county or highway district — Exceptions.

The costs of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining and acquiring rights-of-way for highways in a county highway system and a highway district highway system shall be borne by the responsible highway jurisdiction. This section shall not be construed as preventing counties and highway districts from contracting with the state for engineering or other services provided just compensation is paid. If planning or engineering studies show the existence of a need, a county or highway district may purchase, condemn or otherwise acquire new or additional rights-of-way for a new alignment of or improvement of an existing alignment of an extension of a county or highway district rural major collector highway through cities with populations of less than five thousand (5,000), provided the extension does not eliminate access to adjacent property owners. A county or highway district shall have jurisdiction, with the full authority to construct, maintain and control, over an extension of a rural major collector highway eligible for federal highway funds within a city, when the city population is less than five thousand (5,000). Counties and highway districts may enter into any mutual agreement for the transfer of maintenance and control of the rural major collector highway extension to the city. A county or highway district may contract with an adjoining county or highway district for the construction and/or maintenance of any part of its highway system.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-607, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 8, p. 803; am. 1993, ch. 127, § 1, p. 322.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-607 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-606.

§ 40-608. Record of highway proceedings.

The clerk of the commissioners shall keep a book in which must be recorded separately all proceedings of the commissioners relative to each highway division, including orders laying out, altering, and opening highways; and in a separate book a description of each highway division, its deputy directors of highways, its highways, contracts, and all other matters pertaining to them.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-608, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-608 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-606.

§ 40-609. Contracts to use dams as highways.

Commissioners are empowered to make contracts in a form and under conditions deemed proper with the persons or corporations owning or proposing to construct any dam across any river in the state, providing for the use of the dam either in whole or in part, or in a general or limited way as may be agreed upon for a public highway. If the dam and proposed highway is in more than one (1) county, the agreement shall be executed by the commissioners of each county. Contracts for the use as a public highway of any dam to be constructed may be executed prior to construction, and shall, subject to the terms of the contract, be public highways.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-609, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-609, which comprised R.S., § 901; reen. R.C., § 908; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 908, p. 164; am. 1912, ch. 4, § 2, p. 9; compiled and reen. C.L., § 908; C.S., § 1344; I.C.A.,§ 39-509, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-610. Report of condition of highways — Filing.

On or before the first day of November in each year, the commissioners shall make a report of the condition of the work, construction, maintenance and repair of all the highways within the county, accompanied by a map or maps of them, together with any other facts necessary for establishing generally the situation and condition of highways within the county. The report shall be made in duplicate, one (1) copy to be filed in the office of the board and one (1) with the clerk of the commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-610, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-610, which comprised R.C., § 908a, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 169; reen. C.L., § 908a; C.S., § 1345; I.C.A.,§ 39-510, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Failure to Report.

Failure of county commissioners to make report on condition of highways was a breach of official duty. Robinson v. Huffaker, 23 Idaho 173, 129 P. 334 (1912).

§ 40-611. Report of financial condition — Publication.

On or before the first day of November of each year, the commissioners shall make and file in its office a full, true and correct statement of the financial condition of the county in respect to highways as it exists on the first day of the preceding October, and of its expenditures and appropriation for highway purposes during the preceding year. A copy of the statement shall be published in at least one (1) issue of a newspaper published in the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-611, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-611, which comprised 1890-1891, p. 190, § 4; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 5; reen. R.C., § 912; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 912, p. 165; reen. C.L., § 912; C.S., § 1346; I.C.A.,§ 39-511, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

§ 40-612. Commissioners — Highway contracts.

No commissioner shall have interest directly or indirectly in any contract awarded or to be awarded by the commissioners, or in the benefits to be derived from them. A violation of this provision shall be a misdemeanor, and a conviction shall constitute a forfeiture of office and a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment not to exceed six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-612, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-612, which comprised R.S., § 906; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 913; C.S., § 1347; I.C.A.,§ 39-512, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Indictment.

Indictment which failed to allege that county commissioner was interested directly or indirectly in contract at time said contract was awarded did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. Ex parte Howell, 27 Idaho 590, 150 P. 19 (1915).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-613. Jurisdiction in adjoining counties.

Commissioners of each county are empowered to lay out, build, repair, improve and maintain highways and bridges in any adjoining county whenever it shall appear to the commissioners that the laying out, building, repairing, improving or maintaining of highways and bridges in any adjoining county is or will be in the interest of the particular county or of benefit to the people of it. The expense shall be paid out of the county highway fund of the county whose commissioners order and contract for the work to be done. Any highway or bridge work shall not be done in any adjoining county by a particular county if the work would impair the credit of the adjoining county, injure property, or be detrimental to the interest of its citizens.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-613, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-613, which comprised R.S., § 907; am. 1890-1891, p. 190, § 5; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 6; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 914; C.S., § 1348; I.C.A.,§ 39-513, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-614. Service of notice on chairman or clerk of commissioners of adjoining county.

At least thirty (30) days before the commissioners of a particular county shall proceed to do any work in any adjoining county, it shall cause a notice to be served, in writing, on the chairman or clerk of the commissioners of the adjoining county of its intent to do the work, describing the nature, scope and kind of work to be done, giving the approximate cost of the work, the place where the work is to be performed, the approximate time the work will be commenced and the approximate time that will be required to complete the work.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-614, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-614, which comprised 1890-1891, p. 190, § 6; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 7; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 915; C.S., § 1349; I.C.A.,§ 39-514, was repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Condemnation Proceedings.

Where highways are jointly constructed by highway district, state and United States, district has power to condemn right of way. Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 49 Idaho 603, 290 P. 717 (1930).

Condemnation proceedings were not invalidated by reason of the fact that joint construction of highway was agreed on between highway district, state, and United States before entire right of way had been acquired. Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 49 Idaho 603, 290 P. 717 (1930).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-615. County and district boards — Cooperation with state.

Commissioners of any county, or the board of commissioners of any highway district, are empowered to cooperate with the state in the construction of highways or bridges, with aid from the United States or the state. The boards of commissioners are authorized to deposit with the treasurer of the state, to be placed in the state highway account, the amount of funds to be contributed by the county or highway district on any project for the improvement or construction of highways or bridges, which may be agreed upon in writing between the boards of commissioners and the board. The boards of commissioners are empowered to make deposits in advance of construction and at the time the agreement between the boards and the board is entered into. In the event the project for the improvement or construction of highways or bridges is not proceeded with, or in the event that all of the funds deposited by any board of commissioners for use on any project are not used in the completion of the project, the board shall repay any unused balances to the boards of commissioners having deposited these funds, and the state controller shall draw his warrant for the payment of those moneys out of the state highway account against claims duly approved by the board and the state board of examiners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-615, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 76, p. 420.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 76 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995.

§ 40-616. Sidewalks or side paths.

Commissioners and boards of commissioners of any highway district are empowered to set apart on and along any public highway outside the boundaries of incorporated cities a strip of land not exceeding eight (8) feet in width for a sidewalk or side path and to make an order designating the width of the path and to cause the line separating the path from the highway proper to be located and marked with stakes, posts, grade or other marker. After the sidewalks and paths have been set apart and the line separating them from the highway has been located and marked, the use shall be restricted to pedestrians, riders of bicycles, and riders of electric-assisted bicycles, if not otherwise prohibited by local ordinance or by signage posted by the public agency with jurisdiction after notice by inclusion on a governing board agenda.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-616, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2019, ch. 84, § 1, p. 201.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 84, substituted “riders of bicycles, and riders of electric-assisted bicycles, if not otherwise prohibited by local ordinance or by signage posted by the public agency with jurisdiction after notice by inclusion on a governing board agenda” for “and riders of bicycles propelled solely by the power of the rider” at the end of the last sentence.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-617. Contracts for repair of highways.

Commissioners shall, at least three (3) weeks prior to their regular meeting in October or March, or at other times as may become necessary, cause notice to be published in a newspaper, published in the county, for sealed bids to be received by the commissioners for the repair and improvement of the highways in the county highway system. Each proposal or bid submitted to the commissioners, shall be accompanied by a bond conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties of the contract, which may be entered into by and between the party making the proposal, or bid, and the commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-617, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Contracts for Repairs.

Power granted boards of county commissioners to maintain public roads included power to enter into such contracts as are not prohibited for the purpose of keeping same in repair. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. Twin Falls County, 25 Idaho 171, 136 P. 804 (1913).

Release of Contractor.

Board of county commissioners has neither express nor implied power to accept resignation of bidder to whom they have duly and regularly awarded a road contract; it was to the interest of the county that such contracts be enforced and against its interest to release contractors from their obligations. Corker v. Elmore County Comm’rs, 10 Idaho 255, 77 P. 633 (1904).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-618. Appointment of county director of highways.

The commissioners of each county may appoint and employ a county director of highways, who shall be a person qualified in highway administration, construction and maintenance, to handle the technical and administrative phases of county highway construction, maintenance and improvement. The salary and compensation of the county director of highways shall be fixed by the commissioners and shall be paid from the county highway fund. The county engineer may be appointed as the director of highways if the commissioners so determine; and in that event, his compensation as director of highways shall be distinct from, and in addition to, his compensation as county engineer.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-618, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-619. Duties and powers of county director of highways.

The county director of highways shall:

  1. Prepare and submit each year for the approval of the commissioners a tentative highway budget covering all proposed expenditures for the ensuing year.
  2. Divide the county into a suitable and convenient number of highway divisions, which shall exist only for the purpose of facilitating highway construction and maintenance activities. The geographical boundaries and arrangements of the divisions may, with the approval of the commissioners, be altered at any time at the discretion of the director of highways.
  3. Employ assistants and employees as may be necessary for county highway purposes, subject to the approval of the commissioners as to salaries or other compensation to be paid.
  4. Purchase or lease equipment necessary for county highway purposes and sell or replace obsolete equipment, subject to the approval of the commissioners as to the price, rental or cost of replacement.
  5. Cause to be erected and maintained on county highways, whenever necessary for public safety and convenience, suitable signs, markers, signals and other devices to control, guide and warn pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
  6. Cause surveys, maps, plans, specifications and estimates to be made for the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of county highways.
  7. Forbid, restrict or limit the erection of unauthorized signs, billboards or structures on the right-of-way of any county highway, and remove and destroy any unauthorized signs.
  8. Perform other acts as may be authorized by the commissioners for the improvement and maintenance of county highways.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-619, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

Chapter 7 APPROPRIATIONS

Sec.

§ 40-701. Highway distribution account — Apportionment.

  1. There is established in the state treasury an account known as the “Highway Distribution Account,” to which shall be credited:
    1. Moneys as provided by sections 63-2412(1)(f)4. and 63-2418(4), Idaho Code;
    2. All moneys collected by the department, their agents and vendors, and county assessors and sheriffs, under the provisions of title 49, Idaho Code, except as otherwise specifically provided for; and
    3. All other moneys as may be provided by law.
  2. The highway distribution account shall be apportioned as follows:
    1. Thirty-eight percent (38%) in fiscal year 2021, thirty-eight and one-half percent (38.5%) in fiscal year 2022, thirty-nine percent (39%) in fiscal year 2023, thirty-nine and one-half percent (39.5%) in fiscal year 2024, thirty-nine and three-quarters percent (39.75%) in fiscal year 2025, and forty percent (40%) thereafter to local units of government as provided in section 40-709, Idaho Code;
    2. Fifty-seven percent (57%) in fiscal year 2021, fifty-seven and one-half percent (57.5%) in fiscal year 2022, fifty-eight percent (58%) in fiscal year 2023, fifty-eight and one-half percent (58.5%) in fiscal year 2024, fifty-nine and one-quarter percent (59.25%) in fiscal year 2025, and sixty percent (60%) thereafter to the state highway account established in section 40-702, Idaho Code; and
    3. Five percent (5%) in fiscal year 2021, four percent (4%) in fiscal year 2022, three percent (3%) in fiscal year 2023, two percent (2%) in fiscal year 2024, one percent (1%) in fiscal year 2025, and zero dollars thereafter to the law enforcement account [fund], established in section 67-2914, Idaho Code. The state controller shall cause the remittance of the moneys apportioned to local units of government not later than January 25, April 25, July 25 and October 25 of each year, and to the law enforcement account [fund] and the state highway account as the moneys become available to the highway distribution account.
  3. All new revenues generated by increases in registration fees and fees on electric and hybrid vehicles pursuant to the provisions of House Bill No. 312, as amended in the Senate, as amended in the Senate, during the first regular session of the sixty-third Idaho legislature, and all revenues generated by fees on electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles pursuant to the provisions of section 49-457, Idaho Code, shall be apportioned as follows:
    1. Forty percent (40%) to local units of government as provided in section 40-709, Idaho Code; and
    2. Sixty percent (60%) to the state highway account established in section 40-702, Idaho Code.
  4. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the highway distribution account shall be paid to the highway distribution account.
  5. All idle moneys in the dedicated highway trust or asset accounts or subaccounts established from highway user revenues, reimbursements, fees or permits shall be invested by the state treasurer in the same manner as provided under section 67-1210, Idaho Code, with respect to other surplus or idle moneys in the state treasury. Interest earned on the investments shall be returned to the various highway trust or asset accounts and subaccounts.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-701, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 198, § 2, p. 376; am. 1988, ch. 265, § 570, p. 549; am. 1989, ch. 310, § 31, p. 769; am. 1989, ch. 348, § 1, p. 875; am. 1990, ch. 158, § 1, p. 343; am. 1991, ch. 120, § 3, p. 259; am. 1992, ch. 337, § 2, p. 1008; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 77, p. 420; am. 1994, ch. 409, § 1, p. 1280; am. 1996, ch. 343, § 1, p. 1149; am. 1998, ch. 199, § 1, p. 712; am. 1999, ch. 320, § 1, p. 815; am. 2009, ch. 332, § 4, p. 962; am. 2015, ch. 341, § 15, p. 1276; am. 2017, ch. 43, § 2, p. 63; am. 2019, ch. 308, § 1, p. 928.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 7 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-701. 1885, p. 162, § 10; R.S., § 932; reen. R.C., § 928; am. 1911, ch. 133, p. 419; compiled and reen. C.L., § 928; C.S., § 1350; I.C.A.,§ 39-601; am. 1933, ch. 120, § 1, p. 189.

40-702. C.S., § 1350-A, as added by 1923, ch. 94, § 1, p. 112; I.C.A.,§ 39-602.

40-703. 1923, ch. 94, § 2, p. 112; I.C.A.,§ 39-603.

40-704. R.C., § 928a, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, p. 170; reen. C.L., § 928a; C.S., § 1351; I.C.A.,§ 39-604.

40-705. R.C., § 928b, as added by 1911, ch. 60, § 3, subd. 928b, p. 170; reen. C.L., § 928b; C.S., § 1352; I.C.A.,§ 39-605; am. 1982, ch. 125, § 2, p. 361.

40-706. 1885, p. 162, § 14; R.S., § 933; reen. R.C., § 929; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, p. 165; reen. C.L., § 929; C.S., § 1353; I.C.A.,§ 39-606.

40-707. R.S., § 934; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 930; C.S., § 1354; I.C.A.,§ 39-607; am. 1982, ch. 317, § 1, p. 791.

40-708. R.S., § 935; am. 1899, p. 405, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 931; C.S., § 1355; I.C.A.,§ 39-608.

40-709. R.S., § 936; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 932; C.S., § 1356; I.C.A.,§ 39-609.

40-710. R.S., § 937; am. 1907, p. 456, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 933; C.S., § 1357; I.C.A.,§ 39-610.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 332, updated the section references in subsection (1)(a).

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 341 added subsection (3), and redesignated former subsections (3) and (4) as subsections (4) and (5).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 43, inserted “and all revenues generated by fees on electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles pursuant to the provisions of section 49-457, Idaho Code” near the end of the introductory paragraph in subsection (3).

Legislative Intent.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 308, in subsection (2), rewrote paragraphs (a) and (b), which formerly read: “(a) Thirty-eight percent (38%) to local units of government as provided in section 40-709, Idaho Code; (b) Fifty-seven percent (57%) to the state highway account established in section 40-702, Idaho Code; and”, and, in paragraph (c), inserted “in fiscal year 2021, four percent (4%) in fiscal year 2022, three percent (3%) in fiscal year 2023, two percent (2%) in fiscal year 2024, one percent (1%) in fiscal year 2025, and zero dollars thereafter” near the beginning, and substituted “law enforcement” for “state highway” and “state highway” for “law enforcement” near the end. Legislative Intent.

Section 6 of S.L. 2009, ch. 332 provided: “It is legislative intent, in light of changing consumption patterns relating to motor vehicle fuels, including gasohol, biodiesel and biodiesel blends, to review on an annual basis the distributions to the State Highway Account provided for in Sections 63-2412(1)(e) and 63-2418(3), Idaho Code.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertions in paragraph (2)(c) were added by the compiler to correct the name of the referenced fund. See§ 67-2914.

S.L. 2011, ch. 151, § 21 purported to amend the version of this section which was amended by S.L. 2009, ch. 333, effective July 1, 2011; however, that version was repealed by S.L. 2011, ch. 68, § 1, effective July 1, 2011, and the amendment by S.L. 2011, ch. 151 was not given effect.

House Bill No. 312, referred to in the introductory paragraph in subsection (3), was enacted as S.L. 2015, Chapter 341, which is codified as§§ 40-719, 49-402, 49-434, 49-457, 57-814, 63-2402, 63-2412, and this section.

Section 14 of S.L. 2015, ch. 341 provided: “Legislative Intent. This legislation is intended to be an interconnected solution to raise revenue for Idaho’s transportation infrastructure and maintenance.”

Section 16 of S.L. 2015, ch. 341 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1988, ch. 198 read: “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 1 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 1988. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1988.” Approved March 28, 1988.

Section 586 of S.L. 1988, ch. 265 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 1989.

Section 34 of S.L. 1989, ch. 310 declared an emergency and provided that the act would become effective retroactively to January 1, 1989. Approved April 5, 1989.

Section 2 of S.L. 1989, ch. 348 declared an emergency. Approved April 5, 1989.

Section 4 of S.L. 1991, ch. 120 declared an emergency and provided that § 1 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 1991 and §§ 2 and 3 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1991. Approved March 1, 1991.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 77 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995. Section 2 of S.L. 1998, ch. 199 declared an emergency and provided this act shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval, and retroactively to April 1, 1996. Approved March 20, 1998.

Section 7 of S.L. 2009, ch. 332 provided the act should take effect on and after July 1, 2009.

Section 17 of S.L. 2015, chapter 341, as amended by S.L. 2017, ch. 322, § 13, declared an emergency and provided that Sections 6 and 7 of the act were effective April 21, 2015, and Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 [amending this section] and 16 of that act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2015.

Section 3 of S.L. 2017, ch. 43 declared an emergency. Approved February 28, 2017.

CASE NOTES

Cited

French v. Sorensen, 113 Idaho 950, 751 P.2d 98 (1988).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Interest earnings upon funds dedicated to highway purposes by Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 17, should be credited to the highway distribution account established by Idaho Code,§ 40-701, and not to the state general account.OAG 89-8.

§ 40-701A. Restricted highway fund. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-701A, as added by 1996, ch. 343, § 2, p. 1149; am. 1997, ch. 236, § 1, p. 686; am. 1998, ch. 181, § 1, p. 667, was amended by S.L. 1999, ch. 194, § 1, p. 504, effective July 1, 1999, and was repealed by S.L. 1999, ch. 320, § 4, effective July 1, 1999.

§ 40-702. State highway account — Establishment.

For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this title, there is established in the dedicated fund of the state treasury an account to be known as the state highway account, which account shall include:

  1. All moneys received by the state treasurer for deposit to the state highway account.
  2. All fines, penalties and forfeitures incurred and collected for violations of the provisions of this title, except as otherwise provided.
  3. All donations to the state from any source for the construction and improvement of highways.
  4. All moneys received from local boards under joint contracts for the construction of state highways.
  5. All federal surface transportation funds received from the United States government, including, but not limited to, funds received pursuant to chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, for the national highway systems program, the surface transportation program, the highway bridge program, the minimum guarantee program, the federal lands highways program and other similar programs under successor laws.
  6. Other moneys which may be provided by law for the construction and improvement of state highways.
  7. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the state highway account shall be paid to the state highway account.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-702, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1990, ch. 158, § 2, p. 343; am. 2005, ch. 378, § 4, p. 1217.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-702 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

Federal References.

Chapter 1 of Title 23 of the United States Code, referred to in paragraph (5), is codified as 23 USCS § 101 et seq.

§ 40-703. Establishment of local bridge inspection account — Administration.

In order to promote public safety at bridges on local public highways and to provide for the payment of the local matching share of federal funds available for periodic inspection of these bridges to comply with federal laws, there is established in the dedicated fund of the state treasury an account known as the “local bridge inspection account.” The department is charged with the sole and exclusive administration of this account, and shall follow federal guidelines in making bridge inspections which are to be funded in part with federal funds. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the local bridge inspection account shall be paid to the local bridge inspection account.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-703, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1990, ch. 158, § 3, p. 343.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-703 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

§ 40-704. Turnpike project accounts — Establishment.

In order to provide for the redemption of and interest on turnpike revenue bonds, and construction, maintenance and operation of turnpike projects, there may be established in the dedicated fund of the state treasury an account to be known by the appropriate name of each turnpike project. Each account shall include all moneys received and paid over for the particular turnpike project, and the moneys in each account shall be expended solely for that turnpike project.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-704, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-704 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

§ 40-705. Transfer and control of funds.

All funds, appropriations and other moneys from whatever source, now or subsequently appropriated and provided by law for the administration of the functions, powers and duties of the department and the board, including those of the state highway account, shall be and the same hereby are transferred and made available to and placed under the control of the board and appropriated for expenditure by it and shall be paid out by the state treasurer in the manner provided by the constitution and the laws of the state of Idaho.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-705, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-705 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Payment of Funds.

The provision of former law that the funds shall be paid out by the state treasurer in the manner provided by the constitution and the laws of the state of Idaho was specific legislative recognition of the superior authority of Idaho Const., Art. IV, § 1, which prohibits the payment of claims against the state, except salaries and compensation of officers fixed by law, unless examined by the board of examiners, and of former law that related to appropriation of moneys in the highway fund and recognized the superior constitutional power and duty of the board of examiners to examine claims. Rich v. Williams, 81 Idaho 311, 341 P.2d 432 (1959).

§ 40-706. Disposition of motor vehicle registration money.

All moneys collected in any county from the registration of motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers shall be forwarded to the state treasurer not later than the fifteenth day of the month following the calendar month in which the moneys were collected, and the state treasurer shall then pay the moneys collected into the highway distribution account, unless otherwise provided by law.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-706, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-706 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Basis of Apportionment.

Where the plaintiff district and another district were organized to take over a part of the defendant highway district, the basis for the apportionment among the districts to compute the amount each would pay annually for the retirement of outstanding bonds at the time of the separation was the relative assessed valuations of the districts and not their automobile license fees. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

Constitutional Prohibition.

Idaho Const., Art. VIII, § 2, prohibiting lending of state’s credit, applies to state’s share of motor vehicle license fees on deposit in banks. White v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co., 50 Idaho 589, 298 P. 933 (1931), overruled on other grounds, Independent Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Diefendorf, 57 Idaho 191, 64 P.2d 393 (1937).

Construction.

Nowhere in the words or spirit of Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 17, is the legislature prohibited from taking the course of action exemplified in former law that provided that the moneys collected from licensing of motor vehicles, trailers and semitrailers should be sent to the state treasurer for deposit in the state highway fund. Williams v. Swensen, 93 Idaho 542, 467 P.2d 1 (1970). Construction.

Former law that directed that county treasurer pay state share of motor license money to state treasurer without any requirement that it should be paid on order of county auditor and, in action to recover same, it was not necessary to allege order directing payment of such funds to state. State ex rel. Gallet v. Cleland, 42 Idaho 803, 248 P. 831 (1926).

Expense of Collection.

Where the legislature delegated to the various counties the obligation of collecting motor vehicle license fees without specific authority to deduct therefrom a sufficient amount to compensate for their expenses, it was not within the province of the judiciary to determine such policy. Williams v. Swensen, 93 Idaho 542, 467 P.2d 1 (1970).

Revenue Obtained from Registration.

The revenue obtained by the state under the Uniform Registration Act from registrations and license fees went into the state highway fund via the motor vehicle fund and was used for highway purposes and for the state administration of the highways in various ways. Consolidated Freight Lines v. Pfost, 7 F. Supp. 629 (D. Idaho 1934).

Right to Apportionment.

Where the plaintiff district and another district were organized to take over part of defendant highway district, and defendant advanced money sufficient to make payment on bonds outstanding at the time of the separation and reimbursed itself for the advances when taxes were received from the other districts, the plaintiff was not entitled to share in the reimbursement fund on the theory that it was a trust fund; and where the defendant invested its own money for profit and none of the money used in such investment was contributed by the plaintiff, the plaintiff was not entitled to share in the profits so derived. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-707. Appropriation of moneys in state highway account.

  1. From federal funds within the state highway account, there are hereby continuously appropriated first such amounts as, from time to time, shall be certified by the Idaho housing and finance association to the state controller, state treasurer and the board as necessary for payment of principal, interest and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, which amounts shall be transferred to the GARVEE debt service fund established in section 40-718, Idaho Code.
  2. The board may, but is not obligated to, use any nonfederal funds in the state highway account to pay match as required for receipt of federal funds used to pay the bonds or notes as described in subsection (1) of this section. Such match may be transferred to the GARVEE debt service fund established in section 40-718, Idaho Code.
  3. One-half of one percent (.5%) of the moneys in the state highway account may be utilized to encourage the use of recycled materials including, but not limited to, recycled glass, reclaimed asphalt, asphalt containing recycled plastic, recycled rubber tires and paper in highway construction and maintenance projects. All other moneys at any time in the state highway account, except those as are otherwise required by law to be placed in the state highway redemption account, are hereby appropriated for the purpose of defraying the expenses, debts and costs incurred in carrying out the powers and duties of the Idaho transportation board as provided by law, and for defraying administrative expenses of the department, including salaries of the board, the salary of the director, and salaries and wages of employees of the department and board and expenses for traveling. Communication supplies, equipment, fixed charges and all other necessary expenses of the department, including the aeronautics air flight program and the board, not otherwise provided for and all claims against the state highway account shall be examined by the department and certified to the state controller, who shall, upon approval of the board of examiners, draw his warrant against the state highway account for all bills and claims allowed by the board.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-707, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 78, p. 420; am. 1994, ch. 409, § 2, p. 1280; am. 2005, ch. 378, § 5, p. 1217; am. 2011, ch. 58, § 2, p. 122.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Prior Laws.
Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1997 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 1997 amendment, by ch. 180, § 78, substituted “state controller” for “state auditor” near the middle of the last sentence.

The 1997 amendment, by ch. 409, § 2, added the first sentence and inserted “other” following “All” at the beginning of the second sentence.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 58, in subsection (3), substituted “Idaho transportation board” for “highway board” near the middle of the second sentence and substituted “department, including the aeronautics air flight program and the board” for “department and board” near the beginning of the last sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 78 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995.

Section 3 of S.L. 2011, ch. 58 declared an emergency. Approved March 11, 2011.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Appropriations, Effect of Making Specific.

Insofar as specific appropriations were made to different boards, bureaus or agencies of the department of public works (division of public works of the department of administration), specific appropriations marked the limit of expenditures intended by the law making power for each of said boards, bureaus or agencies, and consequently the general continuing appropriation made by former law that provided for appropriation of moneys in the state highway fund could have no application or effect with respect to these specific boards, bureaus and agencies. State ex rel. Taylor v. Taylor, 58 Idaho 656, 78 P.2d 125 (1938).

Payment of Claims.

Idaho Const., Art. IV, § 18 prohibits the payment of claims against the state, except salaries and compensation of officers fixed by law, unless examined by the board of examiners, and former law that related to appropriation of moneys in the highway fund and recognized the superior constitutional power and duty of the board of examiners to examine claims. Rich v. Williams, 81 Idaho 311, 341 P.2d 432 (1959).

The supreme court could not grant a writ of mandate directing the state auditor to issue certain warrants chargeable against the highway fund where the claims involved had not been presented to the board of examiners as required. Rich v. Williams, 81 Idaho 311, 341 P.2d 432 (1959). The authority of the board of examiners as to claims based on an obligation authorized by the legislature against a specific appropriation made by the legislature was limited to determining whether the claims were in proper form, properly certified to the state auditor, whether chargeable against such appropriation, and whether there were funds remaining in the appropriation for such payment; the board cannot veto an act of the legislature or reverse the policy declared therein by refusing to approve claims properly presented. Rich v. Williams, 81 Idaho 311, 341 P.2d 432 (1959); Padgett v. Williams, 82 Idaho 28, 348 P.2d 944 (1960).

Where the board of highway directors (transportation board) was empowered by former statute to hire legal counsel of its own choosing, and salaries were authorized against a specific appropriation, the board of examiners was limited to determining that the claim for payment of its legal counsel was in the proper form, properly certified to the state auditor by the department of highways (division of highways of the department of transportation), and chargeable against the appropriation. Padgett v. Williams, 82 Idaho 28, 348 P.2d 944 (1960).

§ 40-708. Policy of legislature on expenditures.

  1. It is the declared policy of the legislature that, except as otherwise provided, all highway-user revenues accruing to the state highway account be spent exclusively for the maintenance, construction and development of highways and bridges in the state highway system. By mutual cooperative written agreements, or in the event of emergencies or other unusual circumstances where the financial or general welfare of the people is concerned, two (2) or more units of government may, upon a showing of cause declared and entered upon the minutes of an official meeting of the board, the boards of county, highway district commissioners or the governing body of any cities involved, as the case may be, share jointly the costs of the maintenance, construction or development of highways and bridges in any state, county, district or city system.
  2. All moneys apportioned to the board, counties or highway districts, and cities from the proceeds from the imposition of tax on fuels and from any tax or fee for the registration or operation of motor vehicles for general highway construction and maintenance, bridge and culvert moneys, shall be accounted for as to the actual expenditure to the state controller, as dedicated funds by a certification of the governing unit receiving, budgeting and expending those dedicated funds. The certification shall list the actual funds received for the budgetary period in each category of dedicated funds and the actual expenditure of the used dedicated funds. Any balance of dedicated funds unexpended must be shown and accounted for as a beginning balance in the next regular budget. The certification shall be prepared by the director, county auditor or highway district treasurer or city clerk, and shall be signed by the elected county or highway district commissioners, mayor, council, or board members of the respective reporting governmental unit. The certification shall be made by the 31st of December of each year for the preceding fiscal budget year, and shall be published once as a legal notice between January 1st and the 15th of January. Failure to make certification, failure to publish or the making of false statements in the certification shall subject the person so doing to the penalties prescribed in section 40-207, Idaho Code, or be used as the grounds for removal from office of the offending officials. The state controller is empowered to withhold the distribution of funds for noncompliance with the provisions of this section, but upon compliance shall authorize the distribution to be made.
  3. Moneys remaining unexpended in dedicated funds shall not be budgeted and expended for uses other than the limits of the dedicated fund.
  4. Highway districts may accumulate fund balances at the end of a fiscal year and carry over those fund balances into the ensuing fiscal year sufficient to achieve or maintain highway district operations on a cash basis. A fund balance is the excess of the assets of a fund over its liabilities and reserves.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-708, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 79, p. 420; am. 1996, ch. 386, § 1, p. 1309.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-708 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 79 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995.

§ 40-709. Apportionment of funds from highway distribution account to local units of government.

Commencing July 1, 1999, and each fiscal year thereafter, from the moneys appropriated from the highway distribution account to local units of government, three hundred twenty-six thousandths of one percent (0.326%) is appropriated to the local highway technical assistance council, and the balance of the appropriation shall be distributed as follows:

  1. Thirty percent (30%) shall be apportioned among incorporated and specially chartered cities, in the same proportion as the population of the incorporated or specially chartered city bears to the total population of all the incorporated or specially chartered cities as shown by the last regular or special federal census.
  2. The remainder shall be apportioned:
    1. Ten percent (10%) shall be divided equally among all counties of the state.
    2. Forty-five percent (45%) shall be divided among the counties of the state in the proportion that the amount collected from motor vehicle registrations in each county during the last calendar year bears to the total amount of those collections in all counties in the state.
    3. Forty-five percent (45%) shall be divided among the counties of the state in the proportion that the number of miles of improved highways in the county highway system of each county bears to the total number of miles of improved highways in the county highway systems of all counties in the state. The director is directed to certify to the state controller, on or before January 1 of each year, the number of miles of improved highways in each county.
  3. Moneys paid to counties with highway districts shall be further distributed by the state as follows:
    1. Ten percent (10%) shall be divided equally among the county, if the county maintains any highways, and the highway districts;
    2. Forty-five percent (45%) shall be divided among the county, if the county maintains any highways, and the highway districts of the county in the proportion that the amount collected from motor vehicle registrations in each area designated during the last calendar year bears to the total amount of those collections in the entire county;
    3. Forty-five percent (45%) shall be divided among the county, if the county maintains any highways, and the highway districts in the proportion that the number of miles of improved highways in the county and the highway districts bear to the total number of miles of improved highways in the entire county highway system.
  4. The state controller shall ascertain the sums set for the apportionment and remit to the local governments their share of the amount computed. The apportionment hereby made shall be remitted to the local governments not later than January 25, April 25, July 25, and October 25 of each year.
  5. Moneys paid to incorporated or specially chartered cities shall be expended by the governing bodies of those cities solely in the construction and maintenance of highways within their corporate limits and to meet the interest and sinking fund requirements for the current year on any unpaid bonds issued by those cities for highway and bridge purposes, or refunding bonds issued to take up those bonds.
  6. Each highway district receiving an apportionment from the highway distribution account shall apportion those funds as follows: To the interest and sinking fund of the district, an amount as may be necessary to meet the interest and sinking fund requirements for that year on any unpaid bonds issued by that district, and any balance of those funds shall be used for highway and bridge maintenance and construction. Each district may expend all or any portion of the balance of those funds in the construction and maintenance of state highways within the district. (7) No part of highway funds or any apportionment from it shall ever be used for any purposes other than those provided in this section and in section 40-709A, Idaho Code, except as specifically otherwise provided. At the end of any fiscal year an unexpended balance of highway funds shall be carried forward and retained and subsequently applied to the maintenance and construction of highways or the payment of bond interest and principal and sinking fund requirements.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-709, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 126, § 1, p. 319; am. 1993, ch. 177, § 1, p. 456; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 80, p. 420; am. 1994, ch. 280, § 3, p. 867; am. 1999, ch. 284, § 1, p. 706; am. 2014, ch. 214, § 1, p. 562.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

Local highway technical assistance council,§ 40-2401 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-709 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1994 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 1994 amendment, by ch. 180, § 80, substituted “state controller” for “state auditor” in subdivision (2)(c) and subsection (4).

The 1994 amendment, by ch. 280, § 3, in the introductory paragraph, substituted “Commencing July 1, 1994, and each fiscal year thereafter, from” for “From” and added “the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) is appropriated to the local highway technical assistance council, and the balance of”.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 214, inserted “and in section 40-709A, Idaho Code” in the first sentence of subsection (7).

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 80 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995. Section 3 of S.L. 2014, ch. 214 declared an emergency. Approved March 26, 2014.

CASE NOTES

Transfer of Highway Funds.

Though§ 31-1508 generally prohibits the transfer of any money from one county fund to another, and subsection (7) restricts the use of certain road funds, there are exceptions thereto: the requirement of§ 63-806(2) that a county transfer to the warrant redemption fund all money in the county treasury no longer needed, and, in particular, all money to the credit of the county road fund, appears to fall within these exceptions. In re Boise County, 465 B.R. 156 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Constitutionality.

Former law that provided for apportionment of funds to local units of government for highway purposes did not violate the constitutional provisions requiring every act to be plainly worded. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for appropriation of funds to local units of government for highway purposes did not impose a liability on the state respecting moneys obtained from other source, being a specific appropriation from motor fuels tax. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for apportionment of funds to local governmental units for highway purposes was not violative of the constitutional provision prohibiting the loaning of credit of the state of Idaho to any individual, association, or municipality, or other corporations. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for apportionment of funds to local governmental units for highway purposes was not violative of the constitutional inhibition against the legislature creating a liability against the state in excess of $2,000,000, since the statute is an appropriation and directs how the motor fuels tax shall be expended. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for apportionment of funds to local governmental units for highway purposes concerned a distribution of an excise tax and did not impinge against the constitutional provision prohibiting the lawmakers from imposing taxes for county, city, town, or other municipal purposes, since that provision dealt only with ad valorem taxes. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for apportionment of funds to local governmental units for highway purposes did not illegally or improperly divert state funds to other than state or public purposes, the building of highways being in the nature of a governmental function when conducted by the state in its sovereign capacity. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

Former law that provided for appropriation of funds to local governments for highway purposes did not direct a distribution of tax for county purposes, but merely directed the expenditures that may be made by counties and highway districts as state agencies, and was not violative of the constitutional provision inhibiting the lawmakers from imposing taxes for county or municipal purposes. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939). The fact that the counties are not required to present claims to the state for their portion of the fund provided for in former law, to be passed upon by the board of examiners, did not violate a constitutional provision requiring claims against the state to be so passed upon. Ada County v. Wright, 60 Idaho 394, 92 P.2d 134 (1939).

§ 40-709A. Petition for highway maintenance.

  1. Any county or highway district may petition the Idaho transportation board to take action, as provided in this section, to provide for the maintenance of a highway or portion thereof under the jurisdiction of a county or highway district.
  2. The petition and supporting materials shall establish the following facts:
    1. That the subject highway or relevant portion thereof provides the only practical access to a city, town or other developed area;
    2. That the county or highway district with jurisdiction over the subject highway, or relevant portion thereof, is obligated to maintain the highway or relevant portion thereof;
    3. That said county or highway district historically has provided maintenance to the subject highway or relevant portion thereof sufficient to allow safe motorist access to the city, town or other developed area; and
    4. Said county or highway district is now failing to provide maintenance sufficient to allow safe motorist access to the city, town or other developed area.
  3. The Idaho transportation department shall publish notice of the petition as set forth in section 40-206, Idaho Code, and shall provide the subject county or highway district a reasonable opportunity to respond to the petition, to take corrective action, to explain any extenuating circumstances or to otherwise address the concerns presented in the petition. Based on all information available to it, including such independent investigation as it deems appropriate, the Idaho transportation department shall make a recommendation for action to the Idaho transportation board.
  4. The Idaho transportation board shall review the petition and the recommendation of the Idaho transportation department.
  5. If the Idaho transportation board determines that the petition is without merit, it may deny the petition without hearing and issue written findings and conclusions stating its reasons therefor.
  6. If the Idaho transportation board determines that the petition may have merit, it shall hold a hearing on the matter and allow all affected entities and interested persons an opportunity to be heard.
  7. Following the hearing provided in subsection (6) of this section, the Idaho transportation board shall either grant or deny the petition and issue findings and conclusions stating its reasons therefor. The petition shall be granted only upon a finding that the public safety, health or welfare would be endangered because the subject county or highway district is inappropriately and unreasonably failing to maintain a highway or portion thereof that it is obligated to maintain and that the facts set out in subsection (2)(a), (b), (c) and (d) of this section have been established. In determining the reasonableness of the subject county or highway district’s actions with respect to the highway, the Idaho transportation board shall take into account the authority of the county or highway district to temporarily close a highway, the availability of funding and other considerations addressed in sections 40-1311 and 40-1315, Idaho Code. The Idaho transportation board shall not approve a petition with respect to a highway or portion thereof that has been vacated or is subject to an ongoing vacation or validation proceeding.
  8. If the petition is granted, the transportation department may undertake itself the maintenance of the highway or portion thereof or it may contract with another political subdivision to undertake the maintenance. In either case, the transportation department shall certify to the state controller the actual cost of maintenance undertaken by the transportation department or by the contracted political subdivision. The state controller shall pay into the state highway account of the Idaho transportation department or directly to the contracted political subdivision the actual costs incurred as certified by the transportation department. Such funds shall be deducted from the funds that would otherwise have been allocated pursuant to section 40-709, Idaho Code, to the county or highway district that failed to provide adequate maintenance.
  9. Political subdivisions that acquire funds for roadwork of any type either pursuant to this section or by separate voluntary agreement with another political subdivision or the state are hereby authorized to expend such funds outside of their jurisdictional boundaries notwithstanding any other provision of law.
  10. A county or highway district that has been the subject of a petition granted pursuant to this section may request a termination or modification of the arrangement authorized by the Idaho transportation department for maintenance by the Idaho transportation department or another entity. A request for termination shall be accompanied by appropriate documentation showing that the requesting entity is prepared to resume its maintenance responsibility for the highway. The Idaho transportation board shall consider the request for termination or modification, taking into account the information presented by the requesting entity and any other information available to the Idaho transportation board. If the Idaho transportation board determines that the concerns giving rise to the petition have been addressed and the entity is committed to resume maintenance of the highway, the Idaho transportation board shall terminate its prior action and allow the entity to resume responsibility for maintenance of the highway upon the beginning of the next fiscal year. The Idaho transportation board may also modify the existing arrangement for funding of maintenance.
  11. A decision by the Idaho transportation board granting or denying a petition or request under this section is a final agency action for purposes of section 67-5270(2), Idaho Code.

The petition shall not be based on failure to improve the highway or to expand maintenance beyond what historically has been provided. The petition shall also document the petitioner’s efforts to communicate its concerns to the subject county or highway district and explain why the issue could not be resolved. The petitioner shall provide notice to the subject county or highway district, including a copy of the petition and all supporting materials.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-709A, as added by 2014, ch. 214, § 2, p. 562.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Idaho transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2014, ch. 214 declared an emergency. Approved March 26, 2014.

§ 40-710. American trucking association settlement fund.

  1. There is hereby established in the state treasury the American trucking association settlement fund hereafter referred to as the settlement fund, to which shall be credited all moneys as may be provided by law.
  2. Moneys in the fund are continuously appropriated and shall be used to satisfy the settlement agreement as approved by the court pursuant to Case No. CV OC 9700724D, American Trucking Association, et al. v. State of Idaho, et al., in the fourth judicial district, in accordance with the terms of such agreement.
  3. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the settlement fund shall be paid to the settlement fund.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-710, as added by 2000, ch. 418, § 1, p. 1331.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-710, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-710, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 126, § 3, effective July 1, 1993.

Another former§ 40-710 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-701.

Effective Dates.

Section 19 of S.L. 2000, ch. 418, provides: “Section 1 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2000, contingent upon certification by the Secretary of State that he has received notice from the appropriate court of the Fourth Judicial District that the court has granted final approval of a settlement pursuant to Case No. CV OC 9700724D, American Trucking Association, et al. v. State of Idaho, et al. , or on and after the date the Secretary of State so certifies final approval of the settlement, whichever occurs later.” The Secretary of State certified that he received the notice referred to in § 19 of ch. 418 prior to October 1, 2000, and the enactment of this section by § 1 of ch. 418 became effective October 1, 2000.

§ 40-711. Moneys of highway districts — Apportionment with counties.

  1. Within ten (10) days after the organization of a highway board, it shall be the duty of the commissioners to pay over to the treasurer of the highway district the proper share of the district’s funds in the highway and bridge fund of the county, the share being ascertained and determined as follows: From the total amount of the highway and bridge funds, consisting of the balance, if any, on hand at the beginning of the current calendar year, augmented by the amount of whatever taxes may have been subsequently collected and paid into the highway and bridge funds, there shall be deducted the amount of any payments made from the funds since the beginning of the calendar year and also any amount needed to make good any deficiency in the funds that may have existed at the beginning of that year. The resulting amount is, for the purpose of the computation, termed the net highway and bridge fund. The highway district’s contribution to it is an amount which bears the same ratio that the amount of the highway and bridge ad valorem taxes levied by the county within the highway district in the preceding year (less twenty-five per cent (25%) of the highway fund levied within any included cities), bears to the total amount of highway and bridge ad valorem taxes levied in the county in the preceding year. The proper share for the highway district in the highway and bridge fund is, for the purpose of this section, ninety-five per cent (95%) of the highway district’s contribution to the net highway and bridge fund.
  2. All moneys thereafter coming into the county highway and bridge funds by reason of county levies made prior to the organization of the highway district, but which may not, at the time of the organization, have been collected by the county, shall as soon as collected, be accounted for and apportioned by the methods set forth above, and the highway district’s proper share in it paid over to the highway district.
  3. Pending final adjustment and payment of the amounts provided for in this section, the commissioners are authorized to retain a proportion of the funds as shall be required to meet outstanding valid warrants lawfully issued against the county prior to the organization of the highway district and outstanding indebtedness of the county lawfully contracted prior to the organization of the highway district lawfully chargeable and payable out of those funds. This section shall not apply to the proceeds of taxes specially levied to meet the requirements of bonds issued by the county.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-711, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 40-712. City’s portion of highway funds paid to auditor — Fiscal assistance funds.

  1. Any city which maintains highways shall continue to receive their proportionate share of moneys distributed under section 40-709, Idaho Code, but in a single county-wide highway district organized under the provisions of chapter 10, title 40, Idaho Code, or under chapter 273, laws of 1971, those moneys shall be paid to the county auditor for the benefit of the county-wide highway district.
  2. Any city or county which receives moneys under the provisions of the state and local fiscal assistance act of 1972 may utilize those funds for any purposes that were solely the responsibility of that city or county prior to March 17, 1973, and which responsibility was transferred to a county-wide highway district by chapter 273, laws of 1971. Any city or county which receives moneys under the provisions of the state and local fiscal assistance act of 1972 may utilize those funds for the design, construction, reconstruction and maintenance of sidewalks, when deemed to be for public safety. Utilization of the fiscal assistance funds may be accomplished by a transfer of the funds to a county-wide highway district, and the provisions of sections 67-2326 through and including 67-2333, Idaho Code, may be utilized for transfer, provided, the provisions of the state and local fiscal assistance act of 1972 are adhered to.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-712, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

The state and local fiscal assistance act of 1972, referred to in subsection (2), is Act Oct. 20, 1972, P.L. 92-512, which formerly appeared as 31 USCS § 1221 et seq., prior to enactment of Title 31 into positive law in 1983. Similar provisions are now contained in 31 USCS § 6701 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapter 273, laws of 1971, referred to in this section, was repealed by § 1 of S.L. 1985, ch. 253.

§ 40-713. Expenditure and applicability of funds.

The commissioners and the board of commissioners of each highway district are empowered to expend all or any portion of moneys received by them from the highway distribution account, in cooperation with the state of Idaho or the United States, or both, in the construction of highways or bridges.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-713, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

§ 40-714. Budgeting and allocation of funds.

  1. The commissioners shall budget and allocate the moneys from the highway distribution account to be available during the year for which the budget is made as in the manner now provided by law for the budgeting of its expenditures, and may budget and allocate so much of them as shall be available for construction and maintenance of highways, in cooperation with the state of Idaho and United States, or either.
  2. The board of commissioners of each highway district may at any meeting allocate the moneys then available and to become available from the highway distribution account during that year for the construction and maintenance of highways, in cooperation with the state of Idaho and the United States, or either.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-714, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.
ALR.

§ 40-715. Transfer of sums allocable to counties, highway districts and cities — Disbursement.

It is the duty of the state controller to draw warrants upon the state treasury for the transfer of the distributive sums allocable to the several counties, highway districts and cities, which warrants shall be made payable directly to the county treasurers, highway district secretary or city clerk. The county treasurers shall deposit the moneys in the county highway fund, highway district secretaries shall deposit the moneys in the highway district road fund and the city clerk shall deposit the moneys in the city street fund.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-715, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1993, ch. 126, § 2, p. 319; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 81, p. 420; am. 2003, ch. 32, § 22, p. 115.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 81 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995.

§ 40-716. Establishment of local highway needs assessment account

Administration. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-716, as added by 1986, ch. 99, § 2, p. 277; am. 1990, ch. 158, § 4, p. 343, was repealed by S.L. 1994, ch. 280, § 7, effective July 1, 1995.

§ 40-717. Deposit and disbursement of funds of the local highway technical assistance council — Administration.

  1. Funds apportioned under section 40-709, Idaho Code, to the local highway technical assistance council shall immediately be deposited by the council in one (1) or more banks or trust companies approved under chapter 27, title 67, Idaho Code, as state depositories. All funds so deposited and interest from the same are hereby continuously appropriated for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of chapter 24, title 40, Idaho Code.
  2. The local highway technical assistance council is charged with the sole and exclusive administration of the council funds and shall follow federal guidelines in providing technical assistance to local highway jurisdictions which may be funded in part with federal funds. Funds can be withdrawn or paid out of such accounts only upon checks or other orders upon such account, signed by two (2) officers of the council or employees designated by the council.
  3. The right is reserved to the state of Idaho to audit the accounts and expenditures of the council at any time.
  4. All money received or expended by the council shall be audited annually by a certified public accountant, designated by the council, as provided in section 40-2405, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-717, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 4, p. 867; am. 1995, ch. 268, § 1, p. 866.

§ 40-718. GARVEE funds established — Capital project fund — Debt service fund.

  1. There is established in the state treasury a fund known as the “GARVEE Capital Project Fund” which shall include:
    1. Any draw by the board of proceeds from the transportation bonds or notes issued by the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code.
    2. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the GARVEE capital project fund shall be paid to the GARVEE capital project fund.
  2. There is established in the state treasury a fund known as the “GARVEE Debt Service Fund” for the purpose of paying the principal, interest and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code. The fund shall include:
    1. Amounts transferred from the state highway account upon certification by the Idaho housing and finance association to the state controller, state treasurer and the board as necessary for payment of principal, interest and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes.
    2. Amounts distributed pursuant to section 63-2520(b)(5), Idaho Code. Provided that such moneys distributed to the GARVEE debt service fund pursuant to this paragraph shall be used in combination with the amounts provided for in paragraph (a) of this subsection and shall be used for payment of principal, interest and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes.
    3. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the GARVEE debt service fund shall be paid to the GARVEE debt service fund.

Disbursements from this fund shall be made for projects in accordance with chapter 3, title 40, Idaho Code. All moneys in the fund are hereby continuously appropriated to the department.

From moneys within this fund, there are hereby continuously appropriated such amounts as, from time to time, shall be certified by the Idaho housing and finance association to the state controller, state treasurer and the board as necessary for payment of principal, interest and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, which amounts shall be paid over as directed by the association.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-718, as added by 2005, ch. 378, § 6, p. 1217; am. 2014, ch. 115, § 1, p. 328.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 115, inserted present paragraph (2)(b) and redesignated former paragraph (2)(b) as paragraph (2)(c). Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the GARVEE transportation program, see http://www.itd.idaho.gov/Projects/garvee/default.asp .

§ 40-719. Strategic initiatives program.

  1. The Idaho transportation department shall establish and maintain a strategic initiatives program. The purpose of the program is to fund transportation projects that are proposed by the department’s six (6) districts and local units of government. Proposed projects shall compete for strategic initiative program selection and funding on a statewide basis based on an analysis of their return on investment in the following categories:
    1. Safety, including the projected reduction of crashes, injuries and fatalities;
    2. Mobility, including projected traffic-flow improvements for freight and passenger cars;
    3. Economic opportunity, including the projected cost-benefit ratio for users and businesses;
    4. The repair and maintenance of bridges;
    5. The purchase of public rights-of-way; and
    6. Children pedestrian safety on the state and local system.
  2. There is hereby established in the state treasury the strategic initiatives program fund to which shall be deposited:
    1. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 57-814, Idaho Code, the provisions of this paragraph shall only be in effect from the effective date of this act through May 31, 2019. After the close of the fiscal year, the state controller shall determine any excess cash balance in the general fund. When calculating any excess cash balance the state controller shall first provide for the ending balance as determined by the legislative record to be carried over into the next fiscal year, plus an amount sufficient to cover encumbrances as approved by the division of financial management, and an amount sufficient to cover any reappropriation as authorized by the legislature. On July 1, or as soon thereafter as is practicable, the state controller shall transfer fifty percent (50%) of any general fund excess to the strategic initiatives fund.
    2. Any other appropriated moneys for funding of the strategic initiatives program.
    3. Unless otherwise specified, moneys transferred into the strategic initiatives program fund after May 30, 2017, shall be apportioned as follows:
      1. Sixty percent (60%) to projects proposed by the Idaho transportation department’s six (6) districts; and
      2. Forty percent (40%) to local units of government for the purpose of operating a strategic initiatives program administered by the local highway technical assistance council established in section 40-2401, Idaho Code.
    4. The strategic initiatives program for local units of government shall be exempt from the requirements contained in subsection (1)(c) of this section.
  3. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the fund shall be paid to the fund. All moneys in the fund shall be used for funding the strategic initiatives program.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-719, as added by 2015, ch. 341, § 6, p. 1276; am. 2017, ch. 322, § 8, p. 841; am. 2017, ch. 337, § 1, p. 871.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of financial management,§ 67-1901 et seq.

General fund,§ 67-1205.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2017 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 322, inserted “and local units of government” at the end of the second sentence in the introductory paragraph in subsection (1); in subsection (2), rewrote paragraph (a), which formerly read: “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 57-814, Idaho Code, the provisions of this paragraph shall only be in effect from the effective date of this act through May 31, 2017. The state controller shall transfer fifty percent (50%) of any excess cash balance from the general fund to the strategic initiatives program fund upon the financial close of the current fiscal year subject to the following criteria: When calculating any excess cash balance the state controller shall first provide for the ending balance as determined by the legislative record to be carried over into the next fiscal year, plus an amount sufficient to cover encumbrances as approved by the division of financial management, and an amount sufficient to cover any reappropriation as authorized by the legislature” and added paragraphs (c) and (d); and designated the last paragraph as subsection (3).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 337, in subsection (1), added “and local units of government” to the end of the second sentence in the introductory paragraph and added paragraph (f); in subsection (2), rewrote paragraph (a), which formerly read: “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 57-814, Idaho Code, the provisions of this paragraph shall only be in effect from the effective date of this act through May 31, 2017. The state controller shall transfer fifty percent (50%) of any excess cash balance from the general fund to the strategic initiatives program fund upon the financial close of the current fiscal year subject to the following criteria: When calculating any excess cash balance the state controller shall first provide for the ending balance as determined by the legislative record to be carried over into the next fiscal year, plus an amount sufficient to cover encumbrances as approved by the division of financial management, and an amount sufficient to cover any reappropriation as authorized by the legislature” and added paragraphs (c) and (d); and designated the last paragraph as subsection (3).

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 13 of S.L. 2015, ch. 341 provided: “Legislative Intent. It is the intent of the Legislature that the Idaho State Police and the State Tax Commission shall, no later than the first day of the 2016 legislative session, provide recommendations to the Senate Transportation Committee and the House Transportation and Defense Committee on greater enforcement of the prohibition of dyed fuel and other untaxed fuel use on Idaho roads and highways.”

Section 14 of S.L. 2015, ch. 341 provided: “Legislative Intent. This legislation is intended to be an interconnected solution to raise revenue for Idaho’s transportation infrastructure and maintenance.” Section 16 of S.L. 2015, ch. 341 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

Section 16 of S.L. 2017, ch. 322 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

S.L. 2017, Chapter 322 became law without the signature of the governor.

S.L. 2017, Chapter 337 became law without the signature of the governor.

Effective Dates.

Section 17 of S.L. 2015, chapter 341, as amended by S.L. 2017, ch. 322, § 13, declared an emergency and provided that Sections 6 [amending this section] and 7 of the act were effective April 21, 2015, and Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of that act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2015.

§ 40-720. Transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program — Fund established.

  1. The Idaho transportation department shall establish and maintain a transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program.
  2. The fund established pursuant to this section shall finance projects that expand the state system to address and mitigate transportation congestion. The projects shall be evaluated by the Idaho transportation department and shall be chosen by the Idaho transportation board based on a policy that may include mitigation of traffic times, improvement to traffic flow and mitigation of traffic congestion.
  3. There is hereby established in the state treasury the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation fund, to which shall be deposited:
    1. All moneys distributed pursuant to section 63-2520, Idaho Code;
    2. All moneys distributed pursuant to section 63-3638, Idaho Code; and
    3. Any other appropriated moneys for funding the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program.
  4. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the fund shall be paid to the fund. All moneys in the fund shall be used for the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program.
  5. The Idaho housing and finance association is hereby authorized to issue bonds, secured by otherwise unobligated moneys in the fund established in subsection (3) of this section, for the purpose of financing state transportation projects approved by the Idaho transportation board. The Idaho transportation board shall take into consideration the mitigation of traffic congestion from the state campus site located at 11311 West Chinden Boulevard, Boise, as a priority when approving transportation projects. Moneys from the fund established in subsection (3) of this section shall be used to pay any of the principal, interest, and other amounts for state transportation projects approved by the Idaho transportation board and required for bonds issued pursuant to this subsection in accordance with the provisions of chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code. If such bonds are issued, moneys in the fund shall first be continuously appropriated and used for repayment of said bonds in accordance with subsection (7) of this section.
  6. The authority provided in subsection (5) of this section shall be used only to issue bonds on an approved resolution by the Idaho transportation board requesting that the Idaho housing and finance association issue bonds contingent upon:
    1. The availability of otherwise unobligated moneys in the fund, established in subsection (3)of this section, necessary to meet bond service obligations;
    2. The moneys disbursed being used in accordance with United States treasury regulations to ensure tax-exempt status is retained, unless tax-exempt bonds are not available; and
    3. The issuance of bonds at prevailing market rates of interest.
History.

(7) From moneys in the fund established in this section, there are hereby continuously appropriated first such amounts as from time to time shall be certified by the Idaho housing and finance association to the state controller, the state treasurer, and the Idaho transportation board as necessary for payment of principal, interest, and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, that are issued to finance improvements described in this section, which amounts shall not exceed the amount received and transferred from section 63-3638(16), Idaho Code, which amounts shall be transferred to the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund established in section 40-721(2), Idaho Code. History.

I.C.,§ 40-720, as added by 2017, ch. 322, § 9, p. 841; am. 2019, ch. 307, § 1, p. 919.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho housing and finance association,§ 67-6201 et seq.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 307, added subsections (5) to (7).

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 16 of S.L. 2017, ch. 322 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

S.L. 2017, Chapter 322 became law without the signature of the governor.

§ 40-721. Transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program capital project fund — Transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund.

  1. There is hereby established in the state treasury the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program capital project fund that shall include any draw by the Idaho transportation board of proceeds from the transportation bonds or notes issued by the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, to finance improvements described in section 40-720, Idaho Code. Interest earned on the investments of idle moneys in the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program capital project fund shall be paid to the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program capital project fund. Disbursements from this fund shall be paid over as requested by the Idaho transportation board and shall be made for projects in accordance with section 40-720, Idaho Code. All moneys in the fund are hereby continuously appropriated to the department.
  2. There is hereby established in the state treasury the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund for the purpose of paying the principal, interest, and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, issued to finance improvements described in section 40-720, Idaho Code. The fund shall include amounts distributed pursuant to sections 40-720(7) and 63-3638(16), Idaho Code, provided that such moneys distributed to the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund pursuant to this subsection shall be used for payment of principal, interest, and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes issued by the Idaho housing and finance association for improvements described in section 40-720, Idaho Code. Interest earned on the investment of idle moneys in the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund shall be paid to the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation program debt service fund. From moneys within this fund, there are hereby continuously appropriated such amounts as from time to time shall be certified by the Idaho housing and finance association to the state controller, the state treasurer, and the Idaho transportation board as necessary for payment of principal, interest, and other amounts required for transportation bonds or notes of the Idaho housing and finance association in accordance with chapter 62, title 67, Idaho Code, issued for improvements described in section 40-720, Idaho Code, which amounts shall be paid over as directed by the association. Any funds in excess of the amount necessary to meet the payment authorized in this section shall be transferred to the transportation expansion and congestion mitigation fund established in section 40-720, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-721, as added by 2019, ch. 307, § 2, p. 919.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho housing and finance association,§ 67-6201 et seq.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Chapter 8 TAXES

Sec.

§ 40-801. Authority and procedure for levies.

  1. The commissioners of a county highway system, the commissioners of a county-wide highway district, and the commissioners of highway districts are empowered, for the purpose of construction and maintenance of highways and bridges under their respective jurisdictions, to make the following highway ad valorem tax levies as applied to the market value for assessment purposes within their districts:
    1. Two-tenths per cent (0.2%) of market value for assessment purposes for construction and maintenance of highways and bridges; provided that if the levy is made upon property within the limits of any incorporated city, fifty per cent (50%) of the funds shall be apportioned to that incorporated city.
    2. A special levy of eighty-four thousandth per cent (0.084%) of market value for assessment purposes to be used for any one (1) or all of the following purposes:
      1. bridge maintenance and construction;
      2. matching state and federal highway funds;
      3. secondary highway construction;
      4. secondary highway maintenance and improvements;
      5. maintenance during an emergency.
  2. The tax levies authorized by this section shall be certified to the county auditor of the county in which the levies are made, at the same time that other tax levies are certified for other county purposes, shall be collected by the same officers and in the same manner as any other county taxes are collected, and paid into the county treasury and apportioned to the districts or taxing units in the amount that their respective levies produced, exclusive of ordinary collection fees to the county and the proper apportionment to the incorporated cities.
  3. The total levies for construction and maintenance of highways and bridges, secondary highway matching funds and construction and maintenance of bridges only, shall not exceed two hundred eighty-four thousandth per cent (0.284%) of the market value for assessment purposes.

No part of this levy shall be apportioned to any incorporated city.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-801, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 8 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-801. R.S., § 945; am. 1903, p. 367, § 1; reen. R.C., § 936; am. 1911, ch. 56, § 1, p. 150; am. 1915, ch. 84, p. 202; reen. C.L., § 936; am. 1919, ch. 62, § 1, p. 196; C.S., § 1358; I.C.A.,§ 39-701.

40-802. R.S., § 947; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 938; C.S., § 1360; am. 1927, ch. 73, § 2, p. 91; I.C.A.,§ 39-702; am. 1967, ch. 274, § 1, p. 770; am. 1977, ch. 39, § 1, p. 71. 40-803. 1890-1891, p. 190, § 12; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 13; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 939; C.S., § 1361; I.C.A.,§ 39-703.

40-804. R.S., § 950; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 940; C.S., § 1362; I.C.A.,§ 39-704.

40-805. R.S., § 951; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 941; C.S., § 1363; I.C.A.,§ 39-705.

40-806. R.S., § 952; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 942; C.S., § 1364; I.C.A.,§ 39-706.

40-807. 1913, ch. 126, p. 473; reen. C.L., § 942a; C.S., § 1365; am. 1931, ch. 97, § 1, p. 170; I.C.A.,§ 39-707.

CASE NOTES

Statutory Duties.

District court erred in upholding the validity of a joint powers agreement (JPA) between a city and a highway district, because, while the parties were authorized to enter into the JPA to share the duties and to share the cost of carrying out those duties, the JPA illegally purported to divest the district of the duties to improve and maintain the city street system, or even to supervise those endeavors, while transferring full authority to the city to exercise full control over the city streets, along with its share of ad valorem property tax revenues. City of Sandpoint v. Indep. Highway Dist., 161 Idaho 121, 384 P.3d 368 (2016).

Cited

City of Rexburg v. Madison County, 115 Idaho 88, 764 P.2d 838 (1988).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-802. Auditor to furnish market value for assessment purposes — Board to make levy.

On or before the third Monday in July of each year the county auditor shall deliver to the secretary of each highway district within the county a statement showing the aggregate market value for assessment purposes of all the taxable property in the district, and showing separately the aggregate market value for assessment purposes of all the taxable property within each included city in each district. The highway district board shall levy the taxes provided for.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-802, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2012, ch. 38, § 3, p. 115.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-802 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 38, substituted “auditor” for “assessor” in the section heading and in the first sentence and substituted “third Monday” for “first Monday” in the first sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 6 of S.L. 2012, ch. 38 declared an emergency and made this section retroactive to January 1, 2012. Approved March 6, 2012.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-803. Collection by county officials.

The taxes levied by a highway board shall be extended on the general roll by the county assessor in a separate column at the rate fixed by the highway board and certified by the secretary of the highway board, at the same time the county taxes are extended. The taxes shall be carried into a column of aggregates and shall be collected by the tax collector of the county at the time and in the manner provided by law for collecting county taxes. The tax collector shall have the same powers conferred upon him respecting the collection of highway district taxes and the sale of delinquent property as are conferred respecting the collection of other county taxes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-803, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-803 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

§ 40-804. Liability of county officials.

All county officers entrusted with the assessment, collection, paying over or custody of taxes of any highway district within the county, and their sureties, shall be liable upon their official bonds for the faithful performance of their duties in the assessment, collection and safekeeping of the highway district taxes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-804, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-804 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Rexburg v. Madison County, 115 Idaho 88, 764 P.2d 838 (1988).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-805. Payment of money to district.

It is the duty of the tax collector of the county to pay over to the treasurer of the highway district all district tax moneys collected by him and payable to the district as soon as they are collected, and on or before the third Monday in July in each year make a final settlement with the district treasurer respecting the district taxes and pay over all moneys then due to the district, including all the district’s proportionate amount of delinquent district taxes, interest and costs on all tax sales and redemptions from them. The treasurer of the district shall give to the tax collector of the county duplicate receipts for the payments, and the tax collector shall give one to the secretary of the district and the other shall be an acquittance to the county tax collector in settling with the highway district, to the extent of the payment shown.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-805, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-805 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-806. General laws applicable.

All ad valorem highway taxes levied and assessed under the provisions of this title shall become due and delinquent and shall attach to and become a lien on the real property assessed at the same time as other county taxes. All the provisions of the Idaho Code, governing the assessing and collecting of county taxes, are applicable to the assessment and collection of highway district taxes, wherever the same are consistent with the provisions of this title.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-806, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-806 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-807. Joint local highway jurisdiction bridges — Additional tax levy.

  1. Any two (2) or more local highway jurisdictions in the state are empowered to join in the construction, maintenance and repair of bridges at places where the bridges will directly benefit each of the local highway jurisdictions, and contract for the cost of construction, maintenance or repair of the bridge that each local highway jurisdiction is to bear.
  2. For the purpose of defraying the costs and expenses incurred under the provisions of this section, the commissioners of the respective local highway jurisdictions are empowered to levy upon all taxable property of each local highway jurisdiction, in addition to all other taxes, an annual tax not exceeding twenty-four ten thousandths percent (0.0024%) of the market value for assessment purposes of the property. The entire proceeds of the levy shall be used solely for the purposes of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-807, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 154, § 2, p. 528.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-807 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-801.

§ 40-808. Creation of special tax districts — Apportionment of costs.

As a highway is built and completed with the proceeds of a bond issue within an area of land which under a resolution of a highway district board is provided, there may be created a special tax district. When the highway has been accepted by the highway district board, and the director of highways for the district has certified to his board the cost of the highway so far as it lies within the special tax district, then the highway district board shall, by order, create a special tax district, fix and designate the boundaries of it, and designate the portion of the cost of the highway to be charged against the land in the special tax district, not exceeding the maximum percentage specified in the original resolution. The highway district board shall fix and determine the amount per acre charged against the lands within the special tax district, not exceeding, in respect to any single highway, the maximum amount per acre specified for the highway in the original resolution. The amount per acre need not be the precise proportionate cost of the highway, but may be the approximate proportion, avoiding inconvenient fractions or fractional parts of a dollar, and shall be the same uniform amount per acre throughout any single special tax district. The highway district board shall include as part of the cost of the highway the fair and reasonable portion of overhead charges applicable, and an additional amount equal to two per cent (2%) of the cost to cover the expenses of the highway district for the collection of the special taxes. From time to time as highways or portions of highways are completed and accepted and the cost certified, the highway district board shall create the proper tax districts. In respect to each special tax district created, the highway board is constituted the local executive authority of each special tax district with authority in respect to each district, to levy the special tax, the authority being confined in each district to the limits of the highway district, and within the limits the special tax in each special tax district shall be at a uniform amount per acre throughout the special tax district. The order of the highway district board creating the special tax district, fixing and determining its boundaries, stating the number of acres in it, fixing the amount of the indebtedness created by the bond issue which is charged against the land in the special tax district, and the amount per acre to be specially taxed against the land shall be entered at length on the minutes of the highway district board and shall be open to public inspection. A notice stating generally the nature and date of the order and designating the township and sections within the special tax district shall be published for at least two (2) separate times in a newspaper published in the county. On the filing with the secretary of the highway district of proof of publication, the order shall be deemed complete.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-808, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-809. Appeal from order of highway district board in special tax districts.

Within thirty (30) days after the filing provided for in section 40-808, Idaho Code, but not after the expiration of the thirty (30) days, any owner of land within a special taxing district may file in the office of the highway district board a copy of a verified petition in a proceeding in the district court of the highway district for the review of the order, specifying the grounds of objection. At the expiration of the thirty (30) days, all proceedings relating to the special tax district where copies of petitions for review have been duly filed shall be consolidated by order of the district court into a single proceeding, and notice shall be given and procedure followed as the district court shall prescribe. The district court shall have jurisdiction as a court of equity, and without a jury, try and determine the proceeding. On the review, the only question to be tried and determined shall be whether, in creating a special tax district and in fixing the amounts so charged against the land, the district board has observed the requirements specified in sections 40-810 and 40-811, Idaho Code. The district court shall, if it determines that the board has materially departed from the requirements, make a final order in the proceeding directing any necessary change or modification in the order of the highway district board, and that board shall make the changes and modifications in their order, and the changed or modified order shall be submitted to the district court and finally made as directed and approved by the court. If in the proceeding the district court shall determine that the highway board has not materially departed from the requirements, it shall affirm the order of the highway district board. On the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the highway district board’s original order, without any copy of a petition for review having been filed, or on the filing with the secretary of the highway board, of the order of the district court in the proceeding for review affirming the order, or on the filing with the secretary of the new order of the board embodying the changes and modifications directed by the district court in the proceeding for review, with the written approval of the court attached, as the case may be, the order shall be final and conclusive in respect to all the matters and things contained.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-809, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-810. Levy in special tax districts.

When an order of the highway district board has become final and conclusive, the board shall levy upon all the land within the special tax district created by the order a special tax equal in amount to the amount so charged in the order against the special tax district, specifying the amount per acre. The secretary of the district shall transmit to the assessor and tax collector of the county a certified copy of the levy and of the order creating the special tax district. On receiving the certified copy, the county assessor shall assess, against the land in the special tax district, the amount levied, but it shall not be collected except as installments as shall be called for by the annual levies made by the highway district board of the taxes necessary to meet the requirements of the bonds. The existence of an assessment against land in the special tax district shall not be held to constitute a cloud upon the title of that land, nor as a breach of a convenant [covenant] of warranty, title, nor against encumbrances in a deed or contract for the land, nor as rendering the title to the land unmarketable. The special tax authorized within special tax districts is a tax for the purpose of securing for the special tax districts the benefit of local highways within the limits of the special tax district, as distinguished from the general purpose of the bond issue as a whole of securing the benefit of a system of highways for the highway district at large.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-810, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in the fourth sentence was added by the compiler to correct the spelling of the term.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Constitutionality.
Highways within Municipalities.

Former law in providing for special property road tax on property otherwise taxed for general road purposes did not authorize double taxation within the meaning of Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 5. Humbird Lumber Co. v. Kootenai County, 10 Idaho 490, 79 P. 396 (1904). Highways within Municipalities.

Although road and bridge finances of cities and villages were provided for by statute, county or state could assist in building roads and bridges within the corporate limits. City of Kellogg v. McRae, 26 Idaho 73, 141 P. 86 (1914).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-811. Limitations on levy in special tax districts.

No special tax or charge shall be made by a highway district against land within a special tax district until the highway has been completed to within at least one (1) mile of all the land within the special tax district, the highway has been accepted by the district board, the cost certified, and all the proceedings taken as specified. All interest payable on the bonds up to that time shall be paid by the highway district without imposing on the special tax district a special tax other than its share in the taxation of the highway district as a whole. After the special tax has been levied the highway district board shall in each year, at the same time of the tax levy to meet the interest requirements of bonds, also levy a special tax on the land within every special tax district then created, in an amount sufficient to pay the interest for that year on the portion of the bond issue, the indebtedness which shall have been charged against the special tax district. Whenever the highway district board shall levy a tax to meet any principal or sinking fund requirement of the bonds, they shall at the same time levy a special tax on the land within every special tax district an amount sufficient to pay the principal or sinking fund requirements for that year on the portion of the bond issue, the indebtedness of which shall have been charged against the special tax district. All special taxation within any single special tax district shall be of a uniform amount per acre within the special tax district. Each installment of principal or sinking fund tax collected from the taxation of any land within a special tax district shall be credited on the original assessment of special tax made, and where all the installments shall have been paid, the special assessment shall be deemed canceled, paid and discharged. No special tax district shall ever be called upon to pay as special taxes any sum greater than the amount charged against the district or the land in the original special assessment and proportionate share of interest. In making the levy for the requirements of the bonds, the highway district board shall levy on the district at large only an amount of taxes in each year as shall be required to meet the requirements for that year of that portion of the bond issue which has not been charged against the special tax districts. Should the levy together with the levies on special tax districts in any year fail to produce sufficient funds to meet the obligation of the highway district on the whole issue, then the deficiency shall be paid out of the other revenues of the highway district, and if necessary, the bond levy shall be increased in the following year to make good that deficiency. No failure or delay on the part of the highway district in imposing, levying or collecting the special taxes shall, as between the district and the bondholders, impair the obligation of the highway district upon the whole of the bonds.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-811, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-812. Collection of taxes in special tax districts.

The land within each special tax district is charged with a lien in favor of the highway district to the extent of the entire amount of all special taxes levied on the land within the special tax district in accordance with the provisions of this title. The amounts levied, both as to principal and interest, shall be assessed and collected by the tax collector as other taxes in the highway district are assessed and collected, and all the provisions of highway district law shall apply to the collection and the rights and remedies in respect to them. The portion of the amount of any bond issues of any highway district as shall be assessed and charged against land within special tax districts, shall be deducted and excluded in computing the two per cent (2%) bond limit of the highway district imposed by section 40-1101, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-812, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-813. Liability of special tax districts for general taxes.

All land within special tax districts shall be subject to the same taxation at the same rate as other property in the highway district for the purpose of meeting the principal and interest requirements of that portion of any bond issue which is not charged against adjoining property but is paid by the highway district as a whole. All bonds issued by a highway district shall, as to a specified portion of the indebtedness created, not exceed fifty per cent (50%), be met and paid by special taxation upon the land adjoining the highways built with the proceeds of the bonds, not exceed a specified sum per acre, and as to the remaining portion shall be met and paid by taxation of all property in the highway district, including the property within special tax districts, and including all property within any incorporated cities included within the limits of the highway districts.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-813, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-814. Resolutions and orders adopted by commissioners.

All resolutions and orders adopted by commissioners and boards of highway district commissioners in respect to the organization and operation of each highway district and the bonds and taxes, as they appear upon the records of the respective board, or certified copies, are legal evidence of the resolutions and orders.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-814, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-815. Estimate and levy of tax — Exception.

The commissioners must each year, at the meeting at which they are required to levy the ad valorem tax for county purposes, estimate the probable amount of ad valorem tax for highway and bridge purposes which may be necessary for the ensuing year, and must regulate and fix the amount of ad valorem highway and bridge tax, and levy them. When all of the territory of a county is included in one or more highway districts the commissioners shall not regulate, fix or levy any tax for highway or bridge purposes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-815, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Mandate or Contempt.

County commissioners must have made an annual estimate of the probable amount of money necessary for general road purposes, and, having used their best judgment, were not subject to mandate or contempt proceedings for violation of mandate of court. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 29 Idaho 399, 160 P. 256 (1916).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-816. Indebtedness in excess of express provisions prohibited — Exceptions.

A highway district board, or other officers of the highway district, shall have no power to incur any debt or liability whatever, either by issuing bonds or otherwise, in excess of the express provisions of this title. Any debt or liability incurred in excess of the express provisions shall be and remain absolutely void. For the purpose of organization or for any of the purposes of this title, a highway district board may, before making the tax levy in any year, incur an indebtedness not exceeding in the aggregate a sum equal to one-tenth per cent (.1%) of the market value for assessment purposes of all the property in the highway district subject to taxation. After making the levy, they may incur an indebtedness within the limit, on the entire indebtedness, of the amount of the levy. At no time shall the total indebtedness exceed that amount and may cause warrants of the highway district to be issued, bearing interest to be fixed by the highway district. The power granted in this section is in addition to and independent of the power granted to issue bonds.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-816, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-817. Highway district taxes — Duties of county assessor.

Upon receiving a certified copy of a resolution of a highway district board, the county assessor must assess upon all property in the highway district subject to taxation the taxes so levied and certified to him. His assessment of all taxes levied by the highway district board may be computed and made upon the valuation of property as fixed by the board of equalization for county purposes, and as appears upon the assessment roll in the same year. The taxes as levied by the highway district board shall become a lien upon the property assessed from the date of the assessment, and shall be due and payable at the same time as other county taxes, and in all respects are to be collected in the same way, except that the tax collector must keep a separate list or assessment roll of them, and when paid, they must be named in his receipt to the taxpayer as a separate item. The tax collector shall pay the taxes, when collected, to the treasurer of the highway district and at the time of payment he must specify to the treasurer receiving them what taxes they are, take a separate receipt and keep separate accounts for the payment of the tax. The commissioners shall furnish the tax collector with any blanks as are needed to comply with these provisions.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-817, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-818. Limitation on levies — Penalties.

It shall be unlawful for any board of highway district commissioners or its members to levy any tax upon the property in a highway district for any purpose whatsoever in excess of the levies provided by law. Any highway district commissioner violating the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall forfeit his office, and it shall become vacant immediately. The vacancy in office shall be filled in the manner provided by law for filling of vacancies.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-818, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

§ 40-819. Election to increase levy — Notice.

  1. Whenever the levies provided by law to be made by highway district commissioners will not, in the opinion of the highway district commissioners, produce a sufficient amount of money for the use of the highway district for their purposes, the highway district board may by order authorize the holding of an election within the highway district, at which election the voters may determine whether or not any levy for any purpose authorized by law for highway districts shall be increased to produce revenues for those purposes. If at the election the majority of the qualified voters shall vote in favor of increasing any of the levies, the levies may be increased. The increase shall not exceed an additional twenty percent (20%) of the levy authorized by law for that purpose.
  2. The highway district commissioners shall designate the date of the election that is in accordance with the dates authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code, and which shall be held within the highway district. Notice of the election shall be given by the county clerk in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code, and section 40-206, Idaho Code. The notice shall state:
    1. The time and place of holding the election;
    2. The amount of money which the levy authorized by law to be made by the highway district commissioners will produce;
    3. The amount of money in excess of each of the levies desired to be raised by the highway district commissioners, and generally the purpose for which the additional money is to be used;
    4. If at the election a majority of the qualified voters voting vote in favor of increasing the levy that the levy may be increased in an amount not exceeding twenty percent (20%) of the levy provided by law; and
    5. The additional levy, if authorized by a majority vote at the election, will when added to the levy provided by law provide sufficient money for the particular purpose of which the levy is authorized.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-819, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 72, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.
Effective Dates.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in subsection (2), in the first sentence, substituted “designate the date of the election” for “designate the time and place of holding the election” and inserted “that is in accordance with the dates authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code” and “held,” deleted the second sentence, which read: “The election shall be held between the fifteenth of June and the fifteenth of August of the year in which the levy is to be made,” and, in the third sentence, substituted “given by the county clerk in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code, and section 40-206, Idaho Code” for “given by posting notices in three (3) public places within the highway district at least fifteen (15) days prior to the election and by publishing the notice in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code.” Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-820. Expenditures in emergencies.

In the event of a great public disaster, or if it is necessary to do emergency work to prepare for national or local defense, the board of highway district commissioners may pass a resolution declaring the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health or property. Upon adoption of the resolution, the highway district board may expend any sum required in the emergency without complying with this title.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-820, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-821. Treasurer of highway district — Duties.

It is the duty of the treasurer of a highway district to keep accounts of the district and to place to the credit of the district all moneys received by him, and to pay over all moneys belonging to the district on legally drawn warrants or orders of the district officers entitled to draw them.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-821, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-822. Detached territory — Order determining apportionment of indebtedness — Special levy.

  1. A board of highway district commissioners shall enter upon its records an order determining the net proportionate share of the indebtedness of the highway district incurred prior to a detachment of territory for which the detached territory should be and remain liable.
  2. Notwithstanding the detachment of territory with respect to the future operations and conduct of the district, the board of highway district commissioners shall annually levy upon all the property within the detached territory a special tax sufficient to pay as it falls due, the principal and interest of that proportionate share of the prior indebtedness of the district for which the detached territory is and shall remain liable. The special tax shall be levied at the same time, certified, and collected in the same manner as are the other taxes levied by the district, but after detachment the detached territory or the property in the district shall not be subject to taxation by a highway district for future operations of the district or for the repayment of any indebtedness subsequently incurred by the district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-822, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-823. Levy to pay indebtedness upon division of district.

Whenever there is a division of a highway district and an amount is found to be due from either of the districts to the other, and where a warrant or warrants have been drawn for the amount due payable to the creditor district, and the levy for the first year is found to be insufficient for the payment of the warrant or warrants, it shall be the duty of the board of highway district commissioners of the debtor district to levy annually a tax sufficient to pay at least twenty-five per cent (25%) of the warrant indebtedness annually, or so much of the warrant indebtedness as the limit of levying taxes by a highway district as prescribed by law will permit. The highway district commissioners of the former district shall annually levy an ad valorem tax for both the former and the new district for the purpose of providing a sinking fund to pay the bonded indebtedness of the former district at the time of the division. Upon any levy being made by the board of highway district commissioners of the former district, it shall be the duty of the clerk of that board to transmit to the board of highway district commissioners of the new district a certified copy of the resolution providing for the tax. It shall be the duty of the board of highway district commissioners of the new district to spread the resolution on its minutes, and a tax shall be levied on the new district in accordance with the resolution and collected in the same manner as other special highway district taxes are collected. The moneys shall be paid as soon as collected by the tax collector of the county in which the new district is situated, to the treasurer of the former district who shall credit the tax moneys to the sinking fund to liquidate the existing bonded indebtedness.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-823, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-824. Computation and payment of indebtedness of dissolved district situated in two or more counties.

In the case of dissolved highway districts situated in two (2) or more counties, the commissioners of the county having jurisdiction of the dissolution of the district shall compute the indebtedness of the entire district and shall provide for the payment of the indebtedness out of the district funds on hand, or to be raised by special levies, which shall be determined and levied by the county, and shall be certified to the clerk of the commissioners of each of the counties in which is situated any part of the dissolved district. The tax shall be levied and imposed by each of the counties upon the property of the former district as may be within the county, the tax collected and, not less than quarterly, be remitted to the treasurer of the succeeding operational unit to be applied in payment of the indebtedness of the district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-824, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-825. Levies to pay claims against dissolved or consolidated systems and districts — Certification and assessment — Issuance of new highway users’ fund bonds.

After dissolution of a county or city highway system or a highway district, or upon a consolidation of districts, and at the next regular annual meeting of the succeeding operational unit when levies for other county purposes are fixed, the succeeding highway system board shall in addition to apportioning moneys arising out of the highway users’ fund and the moneys from all other sources as the system or district would be entitled to receive had it not been dissolved and all other tax levies, including general highway and bridge levies, levy a special tax upon all of the property situated within the former boundaries of any former system or district, sufficient to raise funds for the payment of all remaining unpaid current claims against or debts of the former system or district, together with funds for payment of current and accruing terms and conditions of outstanding bonds and warrants of the former system or district. Each following year they shall continue that levy, or make other or additional levies as may be required to fully pay and retire the indebtedness of the former county or city highway system or highway district. The taxes shall be collected in the same manner as other county taxes and shall be turned over to the treasurer of the succeeding operational unit, who shall redeem, or post for redemption, all warrants and bonds as they mature and in order of their line, and for which funds are available from the former system or district for the payment of them. The succeeding operational unit, whenever it may deem it necessary or expedient, has the power to issue highway users’ fund bonds for and on behalf of the former system or district and of the same force and effect as if validly issued by the board of highway commissioners or councilmen of the former system or district during its existence. All bonds shall be in form and issued, registered, sold or exchanged and redeemed in accordance with the provisions of chapter 2, title 57, Idaho Code, and of general law relating to bond issues.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-825, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-826. Collection of taxes — Disposition upon collection.

Taxes levied shall become a lien upon the property so assessed from the date of assessment and shall be due and payable at the same time as other county taxes. The taxes shall be collected in the same way, except that the tax collector must keep a separate list or assessment roll of them; and when paid, they must be named in his receipt to the taxpayer as a separate item. The tax collector shall pay the taxes collected to the treasurer of the succeeding district, and at the time of payment must specify to the treasurer receiving them what taxes they are, take a separate receipt, and keep a separate account for the payment of taxes. The commissioners shall furnish the tax collector with blanks as are needed to comply with the provisions of this section.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-826, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-827. Authorization for voters to approve vehicle registration fee.

  1. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 49-207, Idaho Code, the voters of any county may authorize the board of county commissioners to adopt an ordinance by majority vote of the board of county commissioners to implement and collect a motor vehicle registration fee not to exceed two (2) times the amount established in section 49-402, Idaho Code. The authorization to adopt, implement, and collect a vehicle registration fee may be made by the registered voters of the county only at a general election and a simple majority of the votes cast on the question shall be necessary to authorize the fee.
  2. In any election, the ordinance submitted to the county voters shall: (a) state the exact rate of the fee; and (b) state the duration of the fee.
  3. Any county adopting an ordinance for a vehicle registration fee increase shall contract with the department for the collection, distribution, and administration of the fee in a like manner, and under the definitions, rules, and regulations for the collection and administration of other registration fees as set forth in chapter 4, title 49, Idaho Code. Each month, following receipt by the department of revenues from the implementation of a vehicle registration fee increase, the department shall remit the same to the county implementing such fee, less a deduction for such amount for the department’s actual costs for collection and administration of the fee, but not to exceed one and one-half per cent (1 ½%). The increased vehicle registration fee shall not become part of the state highway account or the state highway distribution account.
  4. The local highway jurisdictions in the county shall use the funds generated by the increased vehicle registration fee exclusively for the construction, repair, maintenance, and traffic supervision of the highways within their respective jurisdictions and the payment of interest and principal of obligations incurred for said purposes.
  5. Sections 49-404, 49-405, 49-408, 49-409, 49-410, 49-414, 49-415 and 49-416, Idaho Code, shall be subject to the provisions of this code section.
  6. Such funds generated from the optional vehicle registration fee increase shall be distributed as provided by written agreement approved by each of the local highway jurisdictions in the county or, if no agreement is adopted, as follows:
    1. Thirty per cent (30%) shall be apportioned among the cities, incorporated and specially chartered, in the county, in the same proportion as the population of the city bears to the total population of all the cities in the county, as shown by the last regular or special federal census.
    2. Seventy per cent (70%) shall be apportioned as follows:
      1. Twenty per cent (20%) shall be divided equally between the county highway department, where applicable, and each highway district in the county, where applicable; (ii) Eighty per cent (80%) shall be divided between the county highway department where applicable, and each highway district in the county, where applicable, in the proportion that the number of miles of improved highways in each highway system of the county bears to the total number of improved miles of highways in the county.

No rate shall be increased and no duration shall be extended without the approval of the voters, by a simple majority of the votes cast.

An election to approve or disapprove the adoption of a vehicle registration fee increase may be called for by the adoption of an ordinance by majority vote of the board of county commissioners or shall be called upon a request in writing from the governing board of each of the local highway jurisdictions in the county or ten per cent (10%) or more of the number of qualified voters voting in the last general election in each county commissioner subdistrict.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-827, as added by 1988, ch. 353, § 1, p. 1054; am. 1989, ch. 310, § 32, p. 769; am. 1991, ch. 285, § 1, p. 733; am. 1996, ch. 203, § 1, p. 626.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 34 of S.L. 1989, ch. 310 declared an emergency and provided that the act would become effective retroactively to January 1, 1989. Approved April 5, 1989.

Section 4 of S.L. 1991, ch. 285 declared an emergency and provided that the act should be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval retroactive to January 1, 1991. Approved April 4, 1991.

Chapter 9 CONTRACTS — BIDS

Sec.

§ 40-901. Application.

The requirements for contracts and bids that apply to all county highway systems and highway districts of the state shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 28, title 67, Idaho Code, in concert with the provisions of any specific statute pertaining to the letting of any contract or the purchase or acquisition of any commodity or thing by any system or highway district by soliciting and receiving competitive bids, and shall not be construed as modifying or amending the provisions of any statute, nor preventing the district from doing any work by its own employees.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-901, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2005, ch. 213, § 7, p. 637.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 9 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-909. 1921, ch. 182, § 1, p. 377; I.C.A.,§ 39-809.

40-910. 1885, p. 162, § 40; R.S., § 968; am. 1899, p. 405, § 2; reen. R.C., § 951; am. 1911, ch. 60, § 1, subd. 951, p. 165; reen. C.L., § 951; C.S., § 1374; I.C.A.,§ 39-810.

40-911. 1885, p. 162, § 41; R.S., § 969; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 952; C.S., § 1375; I.C.A.,§ 39-811.

40-915. 1885, p. 162, § 28; R.S., § 970; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 953; C.S., § 1379; I.C.A.,§ 39-815.

§ 40-902. Bids — State highway system.

  1. Whenever work on the state highway system is let by contract, advertisement for sealed bids must be provided for at least two (2) consecutive weeks in one (1) newspaper, having a general circulation in the county or one (1) of the counties, where the work is to be done. In addition, the department may use any medium reasonably determined to reach prospective bidders.
  2. Each bid must be accompanied by a cashier’s check or a certified check in favor of the department on some bank in the state of Idaho, or by a bidder’s bond, for the sum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the bid, to be forfeited if the bidder, upon acceptance of his bid, fails or refuses to enter into a contract within fifteen (15) days after the presentation of the contract by the department to him for execution and to furnish the required bond. Checks and bonds of unsuccessful bidders shall be returned immediately after the contract is awarded. If the contracting agency allows electronically submitted bid documents, then a bid bond in electronic form with valid electronic signatures shall accompany the submittal of the electronic bid documents.
  3. Except as allowed by the provisions of sections 40-904 and 40-905, Idaho Code, bids shall be opened publicly at the time and place specified in the advertisement and the contract let to the lowest responsible bidder, but the department has the right to reject any and all bids, or to let the contract for a part or all of the work.
  4. If no satisfactory bid is received, new bids may be called for, or the work may be performed by day labor, or as may be determined by the department.
  5. Except as allowed by the provisions of sections 40-904 and 40-905, Idaho Code, a bidder who did not submit the lowest responsible bid as determined by the department may within five (5) calendar days of bid opening file a written application to challenge the department’s determination of the lowest responsible bidder and apply to the department’s chief engineer for the appointment of a hearing officer to hold a contested case hearing. The application shall set forth in specific terms the reasons why the department’s decision is thought to be erroneous. Upon receipt of an application, the chief engineer shall appoint a hearing officer with the authority to conduct a contested case hearing in accordance with the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. Upon receipt from the hearing officer of findings of fact, conclusions of law and a recommended order, the chief engineer shall review the same and enter a final order sustaining or reversing the decision of the department on the selection of the lowest responsible bidder. Following entry of the final order, the chief engineer shall have the authority to award the contract to the bidder determined in the final order to be the lowest responsible bidder at a time and in a manner which shall be in the best interest of the state.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-902, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2004, ch. 233, § 1, p. 685; am. 2005, ch. 125, § 1, p. 409; am. 2010, ch. 293, § 13, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-902 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 293, in subsection (1), substituted “advertisement for sealed bids must be provided for at least two (2) consecutive weeks in one (1) newspaper” for “sealed bids must be called for by public advertisement in at least two (2) consecutive weekly issues in a weekly newspaper or five (5) issues in a daily newspaper,” and added the last sentence; and in subsections (3) and (5), added the exceptions at the beginning.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-903. County, city or highway district bid prohibited.

No county, city or highway district shall bid on any state highway system construction project which is let by competitive bid by the Idaho transportation board; provided, however, the provisions of this section shall not prohibit the Idaho transportation board, a county, a city or a highway district from entering into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to the provisions of chapter 3, title 40, or chapter 23, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-903, as added by 1987, ch. 303, § 2, p. 643.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-903, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-903, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 303, § 1.

Another former§ 40-903 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

§ 40-904. Contracts — Design build.

  1. The preferred contracting method of the department shall be as described in section 40-902, Idaho Code. The department may select design-build firms and award contracts for design-build projects if the board determines that the projects are of appropriate size and scope, that awarding a design-build contract will serve the public interest, and that the method is superior to that described in section 40-902, Idaho Code. The following criteria shall be used as the minimum basis for determining when to use design-build contract procedures:
    1. Project suitability for design-build method contracting regarding time constraints, costs and quality factors;
    2. The availability, capability and experience of potential design-build firms;
    3. The department’s ability to manage design-build projects, including employing experienced personnel or outside consultants; and
    4. Other criteria the department deems relevant and states in writing in its determination to use design-build contract procedures.
  2. No more than twenty percent (20%) of the department’s annual highway construction budget for the state transportation improvement program shall be used for design-build and construction manager/general contractor contracts combined.
  3. No less than thirty percent (30%) of any design-build contract awarded shall be self-performed by the design-build firm awarded such contract.
  4. A professional engineer licensed in the state of Idaho shall have responsible charge of preparing the request for qualifications (RFQ) and request for proposals (RFP) including the base technical concept. The term “responsible charge” shall be as defined in section 54-1202, Idaho Code. The professional engineer shall not be affiliated with any design-build firm submitting proposals on the project.
  5. For each proposed design-build project, the department shall designate an evaluation committee. The evaluation committee shall include at least five (5) members who are qualified by education and experience, and at least two (2) of whom shall be professional engineers licensed in the state of Idaho. To assist in the evaluation process, the evaluation committee may retain the services of nonvoting members.
  6. Any design-build firm, regardless of its organizational structure, must comply with all applicable requirements of chapter 12, title 54, Idaho Code. The designer shall employ a professional engineer licensed in the state of Idaho who is in responsible charge of all engineering on the design-build project for the design-build firm. The term “responsible charge” shall be as defined in section 54-1202, Idaho Code.
  7. Any design-build firm regardless of its organizational structure, must comply with all applicable requirements of chapter 19, title 54, Idaho Code.
  8. Any Idaho professional engineering licenses required shall be obtained prior to submittal of a design-build firm’s proposal. The design-build firm shall obtain any required Idaho public works licenses prior to submitting a proposal unless the project involves federal funds. If the project involves federal funds, then the design-build firm shall obtain any required Idaho public works licenses prior to contract award.
  9. The department shall have the authority to discontinue the design-build firm selection process at any time prior to the opening of price proposals, subject to any applicable obligation to pay a stipend.
  10. After short-list selection and contract award, and upon written request, all unsuccessful design-build firms shall be afforded the opportunity for a debriefing. Debriefings shall be provided at the earliest feasible time after a design-build firm has been selected for award. The debriefing shall:
    1. Be limited to discussion of the unsuccessful design-build firm’s proposal and shall not include specific discussion of a competing proposal.
    2. Provide information on areas in which the unsuccessful design-build firm’s proposal had weaknesses or deficiencies.
    3. Maintain the confidentiality of evaluation committee members and other design-build firms.
  11. The department shall establish and determine the appropriate design-build contract method to select design-build firms and award contracts on a project-by-project basis. The method shall be stated in the request for proposals, and in the request for qualifications when applicable. The department shall use a two-step selection process for all projects. Design-build selection and contract methods that may be used are:
    1. Best value;
    2. Fixed price-best design; or
    3. Lowest price-technically acceptable. The department may only use the lowest price-technically acceptable method when:
      1. The preliminary design is completed and the design-build firm’s role is limited to completing the final design and constructing the design-build project;
      2. No right-of-way must be acquired by the design-build firm;
      3. No utility or railroad permits must be obtained by the design-build firm;
      4. The department obtains the required environmental clearances; and
      5. The department has determined that meeting the minimum technical and designer qualification requirements is sufficient for the project and that innovation or alternatives are not required.
  12. The department shall advertise for request for qualifications and request for proposals in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 40-902(1), Idaho Code.
  13. The RFQ and RFP shall address potential organizational conflicts of interest.
    1. No person or business entity that assisted the department in preparing the solicitation documents will be allowed to participate as a design-build firm or as a member of the design-build firm’s team; however, the department may determine that there is not an organizational conflict of interest where:
      1. The role of the person or business entity was limited to provision of preliminary design, reports, or similar “low-level” documents that may be incorporated into the solicitation but did not include assistance in the development of instructions to design-build firms or evaluation criteria; or
      2. All documents and reports delivered to the department by the person or entity are made available to all potential design-build firms.
    2. The design-build firm shall disclose all relevant facts concerning any past, present, or currently planned interests that may present an organizational conflict of interest.
    3. If at any time during the selection process or during the contract period a previously undetermined organizational conflict of interest arises, the design-build firm must disclose that information as soon as discovered and mitigate or eliminate the conflict.
  14. At a minimum, the following shall be included in each request for qualifications (RFQ):
    1. Minimum design-build firm qualifications necessary to meet the project’s design-build requirements;
      1. Relevant construction-related experience and performance;
      2. Financial, personnel and equipment resources available for construction;
      3. Designer qualifications;
        1. Experience and performance of the designer on similar projects;
        2. Qualifications and relevant experience of the designer’s project manager and key personnel;
        3. Available resources of the designer.
      4. Regulatory compliance risks;
      5. Construction phase risks;
      6. Postconstruction risks; and
      7. Right-of-way risks;
      8. Where all documents and reports delivered to the department by the person or business entity are made available to all potential CM/GC firms.
      9. Award a contract to the best evaluated CM/GC firm; or
      10. Award to the next best evaluated CM/GC firm if the best evaluated CM/GC firm is determined to be nonresponsive, declines the award and forfeits the proposal guaranty or the parties are unable to reach a mutually acceptable contract.
    2. Scope of work statement and schedule;
    3. Documents defining the project requirements;
    4. Maximum time allowed for project design and construction;
    5. Estimated cost of project design and construction;
    6. Requirements for key personnel;
    7. Scoring criteria for evaluating the qualifications submitted; and
    8. The number of firms to be short-listed. The number of firms short-listed shall be no less than two (2) or more than five (5).
  15. The criteria for evaluation of qualifications may include, without limitation:
    1. Technical qualifications for construction, such as specialized experience and technical competence, including key personnel;
    2. Capability to perform construction, including the availability of key personnel;
    3. Designer qualifications;
    4. The proposed plan of the design-build firm to manage the design and construction of the project;
    5. Understanding of and approach to the project;
    6. Organizational conflicts of interest;
    7. Other appropriate qualifications-based selection factors.
  16. The RFQ shall not include any price-related factors. Designer qualifications shall be included in the selection process as a percentage of the total score based on project complexity, potential for design innovation and alternatives, and the project’s impacts to the public during construction and operation. The department shall develop a short-list of the most qualified design-build firms from the proposals submitted in response to the request for qualifications. If only a single design-build firm responds to the RFQ or remains on the short-list, the department may issue a new RFQ or cancel the solicitation.
  17. The department shall provide to each design-build firm that submitted qualifications the summary of scores of all proposers and the design-build firms’ evaluation worksheets within three (3) business days following notification of the short-list. The confidentiality of the evaluation committee members and other design-build firms shall be maintained.
  18. Design-build firms that submit qualifications and that do not qualify for the short-list generated by the department may challenge the department’s determination in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 40-902(5), Idaho Code. A challenge must be filed with the department within seven (7) calendar days of the date the department transmitted the evaluation scores and worksheets.
  19. The department shall prepare a request for proposals (RFP) for each design-build contract. The RFP shall address the base technical concept for the design-build contract.
  20. The RFP shall define the base technical concept, the mandatory project scope elements, deliverables and the project schedule including, but not limited to:
    1. Performance and technical requirements;
    2. Conceptual design;
    3. Specifications;
    4. Functional and operational elements for the delivery of the completed project;
    5. Description of the selection and award criteria, including the weight or relative order, or both, of each criterion;
    6. Copies of the contract documents the selected bidder will be expected to sign;
    7. Maximum time allowed for project design and construction;
    8. Estimated cost of design and construction or fixed price;
    9. A requirement that all proposals be submitted to the department in two (2) parts:
      1. A technical proposal; and
      2. A price proposal;
    10. A requirement that all proposals be submitted in a separately sealed, clearly identified package that includes the date and time of the submittal deadline;
    11. A requirement that the technical proposal include a critical path method and bar schedule of the work to be performed, or similar schematic, design plans and specifications, technical reports, calculations, permit requirements, applicable development fees, designer qualifications as they relate to the technical proposal and other data requested in the request for proposals;
    12. A requirement that the price proposal contain all design, construction, engineering, quality control and assurance, and construction costs of the proposed project;
    13. The terms and conditions for stipends, including waiving of the stipend, and when the stipend shall be paid;
    14. The date, time and location of the public opening of the sealed price proposals;
    15. The basis for design-build firm selection and contract award;
    16. When applicable, the alternate technical concept deadline; and
    17. Other information relevant to the project.
  21. The RFP selection and award criteria shall include price, shall include the design-build firm’s design and construction qualifications, and may include time of completion, innovation, design and construction quality and other technical or quality related criteria. The qualification based selection process required pursuant to section 67-2320, Idaho Code, in obtaining certain consultant services is not applicable. When applicable, the percent weighting of the technical proposal score that is assigned to the designer qualifications shall be based on the project’s level of design completeness prior to the RFP and the opportunity for design innovation and alternatives.
  22. As part of the RFP, and when available, the department shall make available any project specific documentation, drawings, files, reports and other pertinent materials that would be of use to the eligible design-build firms.
  23. The RFP shall address and identify contract provisions including, but not limited to:
    1. Allocation of known risks according to the type and location of the project, and the following risk factors shall be considered: (i) Governmental risks;
    2. Payment and performance bonds;
    3. Proposal guaranty;
    4. General and professional liability insurance;
    5. Meetings regarding the preconstruction services;
    6. The department’s standards, rules, guidelines, and special provisions requirements;
    7. Environmental regulatory requirements, including whether the department or the design-build firm will acquire any or all of the permits required for construction;
    8. Design and construction requirements, including specifications;
    9. The final documents to be provided by the design-build firm upon completion of the project, which may include “as built” plans, engineering reports, shop drawings, test results, documentation, daily reports and item quantities;
    10. The date for submittal of the technical and price proposals; and
    11. The date for opening the sealed price proposals.
  24. The RFP may allow design-build firms to submit one (1) or more alternate technical concepts (ATCs).
    1. ATCs will only be considered if they are determined by the department at its sole discretion to be equal to or better than the base technical concept. Typically, ATCs will improve project quality and/or reduce project costs. The department may allow preapproved ATCs as part of the design-build firm’s proposal.
    2. A proposed ATC is not acceptable if it merely seeks to reduce quantities, performance or reliability, or seeks a relaxation of the contract requirements. ATCs shall be submitted by the design-build firm by the date specified within the RFP and preapproved in writing by the department prior to the proposal submittal date. All technical proposals must include the department’s preapproval letters for consideration of the ATCs.
    3. A design-build firm may incorporate one (1) or more preapproved ATCs into its technical and price proposal. Each design-build firm shall submit only one (1) proposal.
    4. The price proposal shall reflect any incorporated ATCs. Except for incorporating approved ATCs, the proposal may not otherwise contain exceptions to or deviations from the requirements of the RFP.
    5. The RFP will not distinguish between proposals that do not include any ATCs and proposals that include ATCs. Both types of proposals shall be evaluated against the same technical criteria, and a best value determination shall be made in the same manner.
    6. An approved ATC that is incorporated into a design-build firm’s proposal will become part of the design-build contract upon award of the design-build contract to that design-build firm.
    7. ATCs properly submitted by a design-build firm and all subsequent communications regarding its ATCs shall be considered confidential prior to the award of the design-build contract.
  25. Prior to proposal submittal, the department shall offer design-build firms equal opportunity to participate in one-on-one meetings with the department regarding their proposals if the department determines that such discussions are needed. The department shall disclose to all design-build firms any issues impacting the scope of work or base technical concept that are relevant to the RFP. The department shall not disclose information pertaining to an individual design-build firm’s ATCs or confidential business strategies. (26) The technical proposal and price proposal shall be submitted concurrently. The technical proposal and price proposal shall be submitted to the department in separate sealed envelopes marked in strict accordance with the requirements and timeline contained in the RFP, or as it may be amended.
  26. The technical proposal and price proposal shall be submitted concurrently. The technical proposal and price proposal shall be submitted to the department in separate sealed envelopes marked in strict accordance with the requirements and timeline contained in the RFP, or as it may be amended.
  27. After proposals are submitted, and prior to opening the price proposals, the evaluation committee shall open, review and score or otherwise evaluate the technical proposals and any other required technical information in accordance with the evaluation criteria established in the RFP.
  28. After proposals are submitted, and prior to opening the sealed price proposals, the department may hold discussions with design-build firms during the technical proposal evaluations. Discussions shall be held with all design-build firms that submitted proposals. The department shall disclose to all design-build firms issues impacting the scope of work or base technical concept that are relevant to the RFP. The department shall not disclose information pertaining to a design-build firm’s proposal, ATCs or other technical concepts. The department may issue a revised RFP that may or may not include changes in the scope, contract requirements or stipend amount. All design-build firms shall be given an opportunity to submit revised technical and price proposals that may result from the discussions.
  29. Sealed price proposals shall be kept in a secure location until read publicly. When applicable, the technical scores and best values shall be read publicly at the same time.
  30. If an RFP includes a time factor with the selection criteria, the department shall adjust the price using a department established value of the time factor. The department established value of the time factor shall be expressed as a value per day. The total time value shall be the total number of days to complete the project multiplied by the time factor. The time-adjusted price is the total time value plus the total price proposal amount.
  31. The basis for design-build firm selection and contract award shall be as follows:
    1. Best Value Method: Each proposer’s price proposal, time adjusted if applicable, is divided by the technical proposal score to obtain a total score. The department shall award the contract to the design-build firm whose total score is lowest.
    2. Fixed Price — Best Design Method: The department shall award the contract to the design-build form whose technical proposal score is highest.
    3. Lowest Price — Technically Acceptable Method: The department shall award the contract to the design-build firm who meets the minimum technical and designer qualifications requirements identified in the RFP and whose price proposal is lowest.
  32. Proposals that are not responsive to the RFP may be excluded from consideration. The criteria used for determining whether a proposal is not responsive shall be defined in the RFP. Design-build firms whose proposals are excluded from consideration are not eligible for payment of a stipend.
  33. At the discretion of the department, a stipend may be paid to eligible design-build firms who submit responsive but unsuccessful proposals in response to the RFP. The decision to do so shall be based upon the department’s analysis of the estimated proposal development costs, the complexity of the project and the anticipated degree of competition during the procurement process. The department shall pay the stipend within forty-five (45) calendar days after award of a contract or the decision not to award a contract. (34) If a stipend is provided to an unsuccessful design-build firm, the work produced within that design-build firm’s proposal for the project shall be provided to the department for its use in connection with the contract awarded for the project, or in connection with a subsequent procurement, without any additional compensation to the unsuccessful design-build firm.
  34. If a stipend is provided to an unsuccessful design-build firm, the work produced within that design-build firm’s proposal for the project shall be provided to the department for its use in connection with the contract awarded for the project, or in connection with a subsequent procurement, without any additional compensation to the unsuccessful design-build firm.
  35. In consideration for paying the stipend, the department may use any ideas or information contained in the submitted proposals with no obligation to pay any additional compensation to the unsuccessful design-build firm.
  36. The department may either:
    1. Reject all proposals;
    2. Award a design-build contract to the design-build firm; or
    3. Award to the next ranked design-build firm, if the selected design-build firm declines the award and forfeits the proposal guaranty.
  37. The department is not required to award a contract. If the department does award a contract, a contract shall be executed and a notice to proceed shall be given to the successful design-build firm.
  38. When applicable, the department shall provide to each design-build firm that submitted proposals the summary of scores of all proposers and the design-build firms’ evaluation worksheets within three (3) business days following notification of intent to award. The confidentiality of the evaluation committee members and other design-build firms shall be maintained.
  39. Design-build firms that submit proposals and are not selected for the award of the contract may challenge the department’s determination in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 40-902(5), Idaho Code. A challenge must be filed with the department within seven (7) calendar days of the date the department transmitted the evaluation scores and worksheets.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-904, as added by 2010, ch. 293, § 14, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-904, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-904, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 303, § 1.

Another former§ 40-904 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviations enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-905. Contracts — Construction manager/general contractor.

  1. The preferred contracting method of the department shall be as described in section 40-902, Idaho Code. The department may select construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) firms and award contracts for highway projects as provided herein. CM/GC highway projects shall be of appropriate size and scope to encourage maximum competition and participation by qualified firms. CM/GC procedures may be used for a specific highway project only after the board determines that awarding a CM/GC contract will serve the public interest and is superior to that described in section 40-902, Idaho Code. The following criteria shall be used as the minimum basis for determining when to use CM/GC contract procedures:
    1. Project suitability for CM/GC contracting regarding time constraints, costs and quality factors;
    2. The availability, capability and experience of potential CM/GC firms;
    3. The department’s ability to manage CM/GC projects, including employing experienced personnel or outside consultants; and
    4. Other criteria the department deems relevant and states in writing in its determination to use CM/GC contract procedures.
  2. No more than twenty percent (20%) of the department’s annual highway construction budget for the state transportation improvement program shall be used for design-build and CM/GC contracts combined.
  3. No less than thirty percent (30%) of any CM/GC contract awarded shall be self-performed by the CM/GC firm awarded such contract.
  4. A professional engineer licensed in the state of Idaho shall have responsible charge of preparing the request for proposals (RFP). Responsible charge shall be as defined in section 54-1202, Idaho Code. The professional engineer shall not be affiliated with any CM/GC firm submitting proposals on the project.
  5. Any CM/CG firm shall comply with all applicable requirements of chapter 19, title 54, Idaho Code. The requirements of chapter 45, title 54, Idaho Code, do not apply.
  6. For each proposed CM/GC project, the department shall designate an evaluation committee. The members of the evaluation committee shall include at least five (5) members who are qualified by education and experience. To assist in the evaluation process, the evaluation committee may retain the services of nonvoting members.
  7. After award of the contract, and upon written request, all unsuccessful CM/GC firms shall be afforded the opportunity for a debriefing. Debriefings shall be provided at the earliest feasible time after a CM/GC firm has been selected for award. The debriefing shall:
    1. Be limited to discussion of the unsuccessful CM/GC firm’s proposal and shall not include specific discussion of a competing proposal;
    2. Provide information on areas in which the unsuccessful CM/GC firm’s proposal had weaknesses or deficiencies; and
    3. Maintain the confidentiality of the evaluation committee members and the other CM/GC firms. (8) Contracts for the services of a CM/GC shall be awarded through a competitive process requiring the public solicitation of requests for proposals for CM/GC services. The request for proposals shall include price components and meeting requirements as stated in the request for proposals.
  8. Contracts for the services of a CM/GC shall be awarded through a competitive process requiring the public solicitation of requests for proposals for CM/GC services. The request for proposals shall include price components and meeting requirements as stated in the request for proposals.
  9. The department shall advertise requests for proposals in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 40-902(1), Idaho Code.
  10. The RFP shall address potential organizational conflicts of interest.
    1. No person or business entity that assisted the department in preparing the solicitation documents will be allowed to participate as a CM/GC firm or as a member of the CM/GC firm’s team; however, the department may determine that there is not an organizational conflict of interest where:
    2. The role of the person or business entity was limited to provision of preliminary design, reports or similar “low-level” documents that may be incorporated into the solicitation but did not include assistance in the development of instructions to CM/GC firms or evaluation criteria; or
    3. If at any time during the selection process or during the contract period a previously undetermined organizational conflict of interest arises, the CM/GC firm must disclose that information as soon as discovered and mitigate or eliminate the conflict.
  11. At a minimum, the request for proposals shall include:
    1. A description of the project, including programmatic, performance, and technical requirements and specifications when available;
    2. A description of the qualifications to be required of the firm;
    3. A description of the requirements of key personnel;
    4. A description of the process the department will use to evaluate qualifications and proposals, including evaluation and scoring criteria;
    5. Schedule of items for which the CM/GC firm shall submit unit prices;
    6. A requirement that the CM/GC firm describe its approach to pricing; and
    7. The form of the contract, including any contract for preconstruction services, to be awarded.
  12. Evaluation factors for selection of the CM/GC shall include, but not be limited to:
    1. Ability of the firm’s key personnel;
    2. Financial, labor and equipment resources available for the project;
    3. Ability of the firm to meet time and budget requirements;
    4. Scope of work the firm proposes to self-perform and its ability to perform that work;
    5. The firm’s approach to working collaboratively with the department, and the department’s consultant(s) when applicable, and to executing the project;
    6. Construction experience in similar projects;
    7. Submitted unit prices;
    8. Approach to pricing; and
    9. Organizational conflicts of interest.
  13. The basis for selection shall be stated in the request for proposal. Selection shall be based on the responsible proposer whose proposal is evaluated as providing the best value to the department. (14) The contract shall be awarded in two (2) phases. The first is for services during the design phase that may include life-cycle cost considerations, scheduling, cost estimating, constructability, alternative construction options for cost savings, and sequencing of work. The second phase is for construction services. The second phase will be awarded after the plans have been sufficiently developed and a guaranteed maximum price for construction services has been successfully negotiated. Incremental construction phases may be awarded after guaranteed maximum prices are negotiated for each phase.
    1. For the first phase, the department may either:
    2. i Reject all proposals;
      1. Award a construction contract or incremental construction contracts upon successful negotiations of a guaranteed maximum price; or
      2. Advertise, bid and award in accordance with section 40-902, Idaho Code.

(b) The CM/GC firm shall disclose all relevant facts concerning any past, present or currently planned interests that may present an organizational conflict of interest.

(b) For the second phase, the department may either:

((14) The contract shall be awarded in two (2) phases. The first is for services during the design phase that may include life-cycle cost considerations, scheduling, cost estimating, constructability, alternative construction options for cost savings, and sequencing of work. The second phase is for construction services. The second phase will be awarded after the plans have been sufficiently developed and a guaranteed maximum price for construction services has been successfully negotiated. Incremental construction phases may be awarded after guaranteed maximum prices are negotiated for each phase.

(15) The CM/GC shall provide performance and payment bonds during construction phases.

(16) The department is not required to award a contract. If awarded, however, a contract shall be executed and notice given to proceed with the work.

(17) The department shall provide to each CM/GC firm that submitted proposals the summary of scores of all proposers and the CM/GC firms’ evaluation worksheets within three (3) business days following notification of intent to award. The confidentiality of the evaluation committee members and other CM/GC firms shall be maintained.

(18) CM/GC firms that submit proposals and are not selected for the award of the contract may challenge the department’s determination in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 40-902(5), Idaho Code. A challenge must be filed with the department within seven (7) calendar days following the date the department transmitted the evaluation scores and worksheets.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-905, as added by 2010, ch. 293, § 15, p. 777.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-905, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-905, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 303, § 1.

Another former§ 40-905 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Compiler’s Notes.
Effective Dates.

Section 16 of S.L. 2010, ch. 293 declared an emergency. Approved April 11, 2010.

§ 40-906 — 40-912. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-906 to 40-912 were repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 213, § 8:

40-906. Expenditures for which bids required. [I.C.,§ 40-906, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1997, ch. 132, § 1, p. 399.]

40-907. Publication of notice — Documents to be made available. [I.C.,§ 40-907, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 1, p. 149.]

40-908. Security — Amount. [I.C.,§ 40-908, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 2, p. 149.]

40-909. Opening of bids. [I.C.,§ 40-909, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 3, p. 149.]

40-910. Failure to execute contract — Duty of commissioners. [I.C.,§ 40-910, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 4, p. 149.]

40-911. Awarding of contract to next lowest responsible bidder on refusal or failure to execute contract — Application of lowest bidder’s security. [I.C.,§ 40-911, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 5, p. 149.]

40-912. Rejection of bids. [I.C.,§ 40-912, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 6, p. 149.]

§ 40-913. Resolution for use of day labor — Materials or supplies purchased on the open market.

After twice rejecting all bids received for the same project, the county or district commissioners may, after preparing a cost estimate and finding it to be a fact, pass a resolution declaring that the project can be performed more economically by day labor, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in the open market. Upon adoption of the resolution it may have the project accomplished in the manner stated. The work performed or the materials or supplies provided shall be in accordance with the same plans and specifications upon which the bids were based. A complete and accurate record shall be kept of the cost of performing the work and this cost record shall be in a form that allows easy comparison with the cost estimate. The record shall show the totals of all classes and kinds of work performed, the total cost and unit cost of each class, together with the costs of executing the work including the costs of labor, material, equipment purchased, rental of equipment, insurance, fringe benefits, superintendence and all other overhead allocable to that project, including the reasonable value of the use of equipment owned by the county or district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-913, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 79, § 7, p. 149.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-913 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

§ 40-914, 40-915. Duties of contractor — Allowance of contractors’ claim. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-914 and 40-915 were repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised I.C.,§§ 40-914, 40-915, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, were repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 79, § 8.

§ 40-916. Prohibited contracts

Penalty. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-916 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-901.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-916, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 213, § 8.

§ 40-917 — 40-926. Trees, felling into highway or injury to shade tree — Penalty — Bridges, maximum loads, notices, traffic regulations, notices — Penalties and forfeitures, disposition — Local law unaffected — Width of highway across stream — Passageways for stock — Damages by livestock — Bridges and culverts fortified for traction engines. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 9 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-917. R.S., § 972; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 955; C.S., § 1381; I.C.A.,§ 39-817.

40-918. 1885, p. 162, § 36; R.S., § 974; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 957; C.S., § 1383; I.C.A.,§ 39-818.

40-919. 1921, ch. 190, § 1, p. 392; I.C.A.,§ 39-819.

40-920. R.S., § 973; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 956; C.S., § 1382; am. 1921, ch. 26, § 1, p. 34; I.C.A.,§ 39-820.

40-921. 1890-1891, p. 190, § 13; reen. 1899, p. 127, § 14; am. R.C. & C.L., § 958; C.S., § 1384; I.C.A.,§ 39-821.

40-922. R.S., § 976; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 959; C.S., § 1385; I.C.A.,§ 39-822.

40-923. R.S., § 977; am. 1888-1889, p. 37, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 960; C.S., § 1386; I.C.A.,§ 39-823.

40-924. R.S., § 978; am. 1888-1889, p. 37, § 1; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 961; C.S., § 1387; I.C.A.,§ 39-824.

40-925. 1901, p. 185, § 1; am. R.C., § 962; reen. C.L., § 962; am. 1919, ch. 157, § 1, p. 517; C.S., § 1388; I.C.A.,§ 39-825; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 33, p. 61.

40-926. 1905, p. 94, §§ 1, 2; reen. R.C., § 963; am. 1911, ch. 157, p. 481; am. 1915, ch. 55, § 2, p. 143; reen. C.L., § 963; C.S., § 1389; I.C.A.,§ 39-826.

Chapter 10 WARRANTS

Sec.

§ 40-1001. Countersigning, drawing and payment.

  1. The secretary of a highway district shall countersign all drafts and warrants on the highway district treasury, and no payment of district funds shall be made except on a draft or warrant countersigned by him. He shall not countersign any draft or warrant until he has found that payment has been legally authorized, that the money for it has been duly appropriated and that the appropriation has not been exhausted.
  2. Warrants shall be drawn by and countersigned upon the order of the chairman of the highway commissioners, or in his absence, the other highway commissioners. No drafts or warrants shall be drawn except upon appropriation of the highway commissioners, nor in excess of the moneys actually in the district treasury. Warrants may be issued in anticipation of the collection of taxes, but not in excess of the amount of the levy, nor shall any warrants be issued, nor indebtedness incurred in anticipation of the levy, except as provided in section 40-816, Idaho Code.
  3. When a warrant is presented for payment, if there is money in the treasury for the purpose, the treasurer must pay the same and write on the face of it, “paid,” the date of payment and sign his name.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1001, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1001 to 40-1006, which comprised I.C.,§§ 40-1001 to 40-1006, as added by 1973, ch. 264, § 1, p. 541; am. 1975, ch. 89, § 1, p. 183; am. 1984, ch. 136, § 3, p. 321, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Claims to be Allowed by Board.

Payment of claims cannot be legally made until board, at meeting duly had, has considered and allowed same. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Disregard of Statute.

Board of highway commissioners has no power to disregard any portion of statute or strip from it any provision in so vital matter as expenditure of funds, and their failure to consider and allow or reject claims before they were paid was a neglect of official duty. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Subsequent Allowance of Illegal Payment.

Where secretary acted in an illegal manner in countersigning warrants for claims which had not been allowed by board of commissioners, subsequent action of board in allowing claims was a nullity. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

§ 40-1002. Nonpayment — Call.

When any warrant is presented to the district treasurer for payment, and it is not paid for want of funds, the treasurer must indorse on the back of the warrant, “not paid for want of funds,” and shall write upon it the date of presentation and sign his name. Warrants indorsed by the treasurer shall draw interest at the rate established by the district board from the date of indorsement until paid.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1002, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1002 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1001.

§ 40-1003. Notice of call.

The district treasurer shall provide himself, at the expense of the district, with a bulletin board, across the top of which shall be painted or inscribed the words, “. . . . highway district warrant bulletin.” It is the duty of the treasurer to keep the bulletin board conspicuously, securely and permanently in place in his office, and upon it place in a manner which will insure continuous notice of not less than sixty (60) days all notices issued by him, whether written or printed, calling for the presentation of district warrants for payment.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1003, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1003 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1001.

§ 40-1004. Notice to be mailed.

Whenever there is an amount to the credit of the district fund as shown by the books of the treasurer sufficient to pay the warrant or warrants next entitled to payment, the treasurer shall immediately place in his office a notice that the warrant or warrants will be paid on presentation, stating the number and series of the warrants. The treasurer shall send, by mail, to the record holder of the warrant notice that the warrant will be paid on presentation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1004, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1004 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1001.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Failure to Call Warrants.

It was the duty of treasurer to call warrants for payment when amount provided by former law that provided for mailing of notice that warrants would be paid on presentation was on hand and his failure to do so was breach of his official duty. Buhl Hwy. Dist. v. Allred, 41 Idaho 54, 238 P. 298 (1925).

§ 40-1005. Interest ceases ten days after call.

Interest on any warrant shall cease on the expiration of ten (10) days from the time of the posting of the notice. For all sums which may be paid by the treasurer, as interest on any warrant, after the expiration of ten (10) days from the earliest date at which there were sufficient funds with which to have called and paid the warrant, the treasurer and his sureties shall be liable upon his official bond.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1005, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1005 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1001.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Liability of Treasurer.

Failure of treasurer to call outstanding warrants for payment when they should have been called renders him liable for interest accrued and unpaid since a date ten (10) days after warrants should have been called. Buhl Hwy. Dist. v. Allred, 41 Idaho 54, 238 P. 298 (1925).

§ 40-1006. Warrants bearing interest — Duties and accounts of treasurer.

When the treasurer pays any warrant on which interest is due, he must note on the warrant the amount of interest paid and enter on his account the amount of the interest distinct from the principal.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1006, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1006 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1001.

§ 40-1007 — 40-1013. Bids — Procedure — Awarding of contracts — Resolution for use of day labor — Materials or supplies purchased on open market — Expenditures in emergencies. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised I.C.,§§ 40-1007 to 40-1013, as added by 1973, ch. 264, § 1, p. 541, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

Chapter 11 BONDS

Sec.

§ 40-1101. Bonds — Funding.

Every highway district is granted the authority under article VIII of the Idaho constitution to issue negotiable coupon bonds for construction, improvements or repairs of any highways or structures in the district; for the purchase of material and machinery; for contracting highway engineering and construction; for the necessary expenses of the district in connection with these purposes; or for any or all of these or connected purposes. Every highway district is also granted the authority by resolution of its board of commissioners, without election, to issue negotiable coupon bonds for the purposes of funding or refunding any existing indebtedness, whether the indebtedness exists as warrant indebtedness or otherwise. Where an election is required under the provisions of article VIII of the Idaho constitution to authorize a bond issue, the election may be held with other elections. Elections shall be conducted by the county clerk in the same manner as county elections pursuant to title 34, Idaho Code. Authorization for the issuance, sale and redemption of bonds other than funding or refunding existing indebtedness, shall be as provided by chapter 2, title 57, Idaho Code. The total amount of bonds any district has issued and outstanding at any time shall not exceed two percent (2%) of the market value for assessment purposes of all the taxable property in the district as shown by the last preceding assessment list.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1101, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 327, § 1, p. 802; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 73, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 11 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1101. 1866, p. 180, § 1; R.S., § 1070; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1013; C.S., § 1442; I.C.A.,§ 39-1001.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the third sentence, deleted “a special election or it may be” following “the election may be”; and, in the fourth sentence, deleted “as nearly as possible” following “conducted,” inserted “by the county clerk,” and added the title reference.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 1986, ch. 327, read: “All elections which have been held for the purpose of incurring indebtedness and financing projects and all bonds which have been issued pursuant to Chapter 253, Laws of 1985, between July 1, 1985, and the effective date of this act, are hereby validated.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Apportionment, Retirement of Bonds.

Where the plaintiff district and another district were organized to take over a part of the defendant highway district, the basis for the apportionment among the districts to compute the amount each would pay annually for the retirement of outstanding bonds at the time of the separation was the relative assessed valuations of the districts and not their automobile license fees. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

Constitutionality.

Highway district law did not deprive owner of property without due process of law or deny the equal protection of the law, in the issuance of road and bridge bonds. Stark v. McLaughlin, 45 Idaho 112, 261 P. 244 (1927).

Equitable Estoppel as to Retirement of Bonds.

Where a plaintiff district and another district were organized to take over part of the defendant highway district, and the plaintiff participated with the defendant in the disposition of automobile license fees, and used ad valorem taxes to pay its share of the bonds, there was an “equitable estoppel” against the plaintiff from complaining because all of the defendant’s license fees were not applied on the bonds before an ad valorem levy was made. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

Sale of Bonds.

Arrangement authorizing sale of highway bonds at less than par was in direct violation of former law regarding bonds for funding highway projects. Municipal Sec. Corp. v. Buhl Hwy. Dist., 35 Idaho 377, 208 P. 233 (1922).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Securities and Obligations, § 1 et seq.

C.J.S.

39A C.J.S., Highways, § 160.

§ 40-1102. Security for bonds.

  1. The full faith, credit, and all taxable property within the limits of a highway district, as they exist at the time of the original resolution of the respective highway district for the issuance of bonds, or may subsequently be extended, shall continue pledged, and the proper officers of the district shall continue to assess and collect on all taxable property within the limits of the highway district necessary taxes to pay the bonds and interest as they become due. Should the tax for the payment of interest on or the principal of bonds not be collected in time to meet the payment, the money must be paid out of any moneys in the general fund of the district, and the moneys used for the payment shall be repaid out of the first moneys paid into the fund from which taken, and a sum sufficient to cover the deficit shall be levied and collected in the next, or any succeeding year. Failure of the officers of the district to comply with the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
  2. No bond issued shall be invalidated, annulled, or set aside on account of any defect, irregularity, omission, informality, or failure to comply with the provisions of this title, unless it shall appear to the court that a substantial injury has been or is about to be suffered by the property owners and taxpayers of the district. Bond issues shall rest upon the consent of the taxpayers and the credit of the district shall not be injured by the cancellation of securities when issued.
  3. The district may recite in the bonds that all acts requisite to the issue of them have been duly and regularly performed and fully complied with, and that they are duly and regularly issued, and as affecting innocent purchasers, the recital shall be conclusive.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1102, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when other otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1102 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1101.

§ 40-1103. Levies for bonds in special tax districts — Refunding.

Should any bond issue where the indebtedness has been charged in part against adjoining property be funded or refunded so that a sinking fund for the original issue is not required to be established, then the annual levy for sinking fund requirements need not be made upon the land in the special tax districts created in respect to the bond issue; or, at the option of the highway district commissioners, a portion of the bond issue, to meet a sufficient amount which has been charged against the special tax districts, may remain without refunding, and shall subsequently be paid and retired with the proceeds of the special taxes on the land within the special tax districts. If the proceeds prove temporarily insufficient, then they shall be paid from the other revenues of the district. If the whole of an issue is refunded and new bonds issued, then the land within the special tax districts shall continue to be specially taxed for the new bonds, equal in amount to the refunding issue equably, both as to principal and interest, with the taxation of the district at large for the bond purposes. On the funding of any issue of bonds, on receiving from the treasurer of the district a certificate, under the seal of the district, signed by the secretary and treasurer of the district and either by the chairman or by the other highway district commissioners that the bonds have been actually funded and retired, the special assessment made against the land within the special tax districts created for the bond issue as provided in section 40-810, Idaho Code, shall be canceled, vacated and annulled, and a new special levy of the same amount shall be assessed against the land in the special tax districts in respect to the new or refunding bonds.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1103, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1103 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1101.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1104. Form of bonds — Highway district.

In case a vote is in favor of charging part of the indebtedness to be created by a bond issue against adjoining land, the bonds may be issued and the proceedings shall be as provided by chapter 2, title 57, Idaho Code, except where other special provisions on the subject are provided by sections 40-1103 and 40-808 through 40-813, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1104, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1104 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1101.

§ 40-1105. Election — Issuance.

The election and all acts and proceedings had and taken in connection by highway district commissioners in respect to bonds and the levy of ad valorem taxes for the construction, improvement or repair of highways are legalized, approved and validated and constituted the negotiable legal obligations of the highway district, where:

  1. A two-thirds (2/3) majority of the qualified electors of the highway district voting on the proposition voted in favor of the issuance of bonds of the highway district;
  2. Notice of the election was given as essentially provided by section 40-206, Idaho Code;
  3. The canvass of the vote revealed the required majority was recorded in the records of the highway district commissioners, and a resolution adopted and recorded in the district records authorizing the issuance of bonds of the district;
  4. The maturity of the bonds was within thirty (30) years;
  5. A rate of interest was prescribed and an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the district sufficient to pay the bonds as maturity was levied; and
  6. The bonds were in an amount not exceeding ten per cent (10%) of the assessed valuation if sold and delivered prior to July 1, 1980, or two per cent (2%) of the market value for assessment purposes if sold and delivered on or after July 1, 1980, of all taxable property of the highway district, and the proceeds received by the treasurer of the highway district and expended in the construction, improvement or repair of highways located within the highway district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1105, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1105 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1101.

§ 40-1106. Bonds of county.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as a limitation of the power of the commissioners to issue bonds for the construction or the repairs of highways and bridges. Whenever the commissioners shall issue bonds for the construction or repair of highways and bridges under the provisions of chapter 19, title 31, Idaho Code, upon the authorization of two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors of the county voting at an election held for that purpose, pursuant to a resolution of the commissioners and entered upon their journal specifying, describing and defining the highways or bridges to be constructed or repaired, and giving the termini and the general course of each highway and the approximate location of each bridge it is proposed to construct, and appropriating a specific amount for any highway or bridge wholly or partially within any organized highway district, then the commissioners shall have full jurisdiction and power to locate and construct or repair the highway or bridge within the highway district, and to apply a specific appropriation so derived from the issue of bonds or so much of them as may be necessary.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1106, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1106 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1101.

§ 40-1107 — 40-1115. License and toll rate — Bond — Bridges and ferries connecting counties — Disqualification of county commissioner — Distance between bridges and ferries — Condemnation of land — Posting rates of tolls — Disposal of license money — Care of banks. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1113. 1864, p. 440, § 8; R.S., § 1082; reen. R.C., § 1025; compiled and reen. C.L., § 1025; C.S., § 1454; I.C.A.,§ 39-1013.

Chapter 12 BRIDGES

Sec.

§ 40-1201. Interstate bridges on state highways — Maintenance and control.

When interstate bridges are located on designated state highways and designated state highways of any adjoining state, the portions of bridges within the state of Idaho shall be controlled, operated and maintained by the board, which is hereby vested with all power and authority necessary or incidential [incidental] to the maintenance, operation and control of them.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1201, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1201 to 40-1207, which comprised R.S., §§ 1090 to 1096; reen. R.C. & C.L., §§ 1028 to 1034; C.S., §§ 1457 to 1463; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1101 to 39-1107, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion was added by the compiler to correct the spelling of the word.

§ 40-1202. Petition for constructing — Notice of hearing.

When the construction of a new bridge, for which the expenditure contemplated will exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), five percent (5%) or twenty-five (25) qualified voters, whichever is greater, of a county highway system or highway district system interested in it may petition the respective commissioners for the erection of the needed bridge. The commissioners shall then advertise the petition, in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, giving the location and notify the director of highways to attend at a certain time and place to hear the petition.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1202, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 154, § 3, p. 528.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1202 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Bridges — Part of Highway System.

Bridges are a part of the state highway system. The legislature may equally authorize the highway department (division of highways of the department of transportation) to purchase or build bridges. Good Rd. Dist. No. 2 v. Washington County, 27 Idaho 732, 152 P. 183 (1915); Lyons v. Bottolfsen, 61 Idaho 281, 101 P.2d 1 (1940).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1203. Petition hearing — Duty of highway commissioners.

On the day fixed to hear the petition, proof of the notice given being made satisfactory, the county or district highway commissioners shall hear the petition, examine witnesses, and determine whether or not a bridge as petitioned for is necessary. If the petition is approved the county or district highway commissioners shall determine the type of bridge to be constructed, prepare plans and specifications, invite bids, let the contract, have the bridge erected, and provide payment for it.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1203, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1203 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

§ 40-1204. Bridges costing over five thousand dollars

Contracts for construction and repair. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1204 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1204, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 154, § 4, effective July 1, 1998.

§ 40-1205. Bridges — Reports.

The director of highways shall, in his official reports, give a full account of all bridges for which he has in whole or in part the charge and maintenance and those bridges constructed or repaired, the cost, amounts expended, from what source moneys were derived, and the present and prospective condition of the bridges.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1205, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

County director of highways,§§ 40-618 and 40-619.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1205 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

§ 40-1206. Maximum load — Posting of notices.

County or highway commissioners may limit the maximum load to be carried over and on any public bridge over which they have jurisdiction below the limit prescribed by law. In this case, the highway commissioners shall cause suitable signs to be erected and maintained at the approach to the bridge, specifying the limitation of load.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1206, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1206 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

§ 40-1207. Traffic regulations — Posting of notices — Penalty.

Directors of highways, or any other persons legally appointed to take charge of a bridge, may post a notice to set out and provide that no horse or mule-drawn vehicle, nor a person riding a horse or mule shall travel across the bridge or any portion of the bridge faster than at a walk; that horses, mules or cattle shall not be allowed to cross in bunches of more than twenty (20) at a time, and shall not travel faster than at a walk. The notice shall be posted in a conspicuous place and shall be in letters large enough and placed in a manner that it may be easily read by the public. Directors of highways may make other rules and regulations governing the traffic on bridges within their jurisdiction when it is deemed necessary for the safety of the public, and may post a notice of the rules in the manner provided in this section. Any person convicted for violating any of the provisions of a notice as provided for by this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than three hundred dollars ($300), or may be imprisoned not less than ten (10) days nor more than sixty (60) days in the county jail, or by both fine and imprisonment.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1207, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

County director of highways,§§ 40-618 and 40-619.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1207 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1201.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1208 — 40-1210. Penalty for avoiding tolls — Acquisition of toll bridges — Toll bridges costing over $25,000 — Private ownership. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1210. 1909, p. 298, § 1; reen. C.L., § 1036a; C.S., § 1466; I.C.A.,§ 39-1110.

Chapter 13 HIGHWAY DISTRICTS

Sec.

40-1305AA. Initiating recall proceedings — Statement — Contents — Verification — Definitions. [Repealed.]

40-1305BB. Petition — Where filed. [Repealed.]

40-1305CC. Ballot synopsis. [Repealed.]

40-1305DD. Determination by magistrate court — Correction of ballot synopsis. [Repealed.]

40-1305EE. Filing supporting signatures — Time limitations. [Repealed.]

40-1305FF. Petition — Form. [Repealed.]

40-1305GG. Petition — Size. [Repealed.]

40-1305HH. Number of signatures required. [Repealed.]

40-1305II. Canvassing petition for sufficiency of signatures — Notice. [Repealed.]

40-1305JJ. Verification and canvass of signatures — Procedure. [Repealed.]

40-1305KK. Fixing date for recall election — Notice. [Repealed.]

40-1305LL. Response to petition charges. [Repealed.]

40-1305MM. Destruction of insufficient recall petition. [Repealed.] 40-1305NN. Invalid names — Record of. [Repealed.]

40-1305OO. Conduct of election — Form of ballot. [Repealed.]

40-1305PP. Ascertaining the result — When recall effective. [Repealed.]

40-1305QQ. Enforcement provisions — Mandamus — Appeals. [Repealed.]

40-1305RR. Violations by signers. [Repealed.]

40-1305SS. Violations — Corrupt practices. [Repealed.]

§ 40-1301. Districts as now organized validated.

All highway districts as now organized and constituted are hereby validated and shall continue as public corporations.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1301, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 1, p. 894.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1301 and 40-1302, which comprised R.S., §§ 1105, 1106; reen. R.C. & C.L., §§ 1037, 1038; C.S., §§ 1467, 1468; I.C.A.,§ 39-1201, 39-1202, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “as now organized” appears in S.L. 1985, ch. 253, which was effective July 1, 1985.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Tort Action.

A county highway district is a political subdivision entitled to the notice required by§ 6-906 for claims against it; thus the district court was correct in granting summary judgment in favor of county highway district in tort action, where plaintiff gave no timely notice of a claim but merely notified county highway superintendent after the accident that she had not been seriously injured. Curl v. Indian Springs Natatorium, Inc., 97 Idaho 637, 550 P.2d 140 (1976).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1302. County division or change in boundaries — Joint highway district formed.

When a county division or change in the boundaries of a county divides an existing highway district the district shall continue as a joint highway district until changed as provided by this title. It shall be the duty of the commissioners of the respective counties affected to rename the district as a joint highway district, and the renamed joint highway district shall in all things be considered a continuation of the existing district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1302, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1302 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1301.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Notice of Election.

Publication of notice of election, pursuant to petition to organize highway district, was duty of clerk of board of county commissioners, and his failure properly to discharge that duty could not defeat right of petitioners to have an election, nor affect priority of right. Huggins v. Link, 28 Idaho 185, 152 P. 1052 (1915).

Statute of Limitations.

Suit attacking validity of the organization of highway district for failure to comply with requirements of former law regarding organization of highway districts as to publication of notice of an election to determine whether district should be organized, could not be brought after expiration of the statutory period within which such suits might be instituted. Ditzel v. Evergreen Hwy. Dist., 32 Idaho 692, 187 P. 269 (1920).

After expiration of time specified, action could not be maintained to enjoin issuance of highway district bonds on ground of their invalidity because of their issuance by a district organized without publication of the notice required by S.L. 1911, ch. 55, § 4, p. 123. Ditzel v. Evergreen Hwy. Dist., 32 Idaho 692, 187 P. 269 (1920).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1303. Highway commissioners — Appointment — Oath.

There shall be three (3) highway commissioners in each district. The first highway commissioners of the highway district organized under the provisions of this chapter shall be appointed by the governor. It shall be the duty of the governor, in the appointment of the original highway commissioners, where there had been in existence any highway district within the boundary of the newly created highway district, to appoint whenever practicable, existing highway commissioners as they shall qualify by residence in the subdistricts of the newly created highway district as highway district commissioners of the newly created highway district. County commissioners, city mayors and city council members shall not be eligible to hold office as highway district commissioners. A copy of the certificate of each appointment shall be filed in the office of the county recorder of each county in which the highway district is located and with the clerk of the highway district. Every highway commissioner shall take and subscribe the official oath, which oath shall be filed in the office of the highway district commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1303, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 2, p. 894.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1304. Division of districts into subdistricts — Vacancy in office of highway commissioner.

  1. At the meeting of the county commissioners at which the highway district is declared organized, the commissioners shall divide the highway district into three (3) subdistricts, as nearly equal in population, area and mileage as practicable, to be known as highway commissioners subdistricts one, two and three. Subdistricts may be revised or modified by the highway district commissioners as changes in conditions demand. Not more than one (1) of the highway district commissioners shall be an elector of the same highway subdistrict. The first highway district commissioners appointed by the governor shall serve until the next highway district election, at which their successors shall be elected. The highway commissioners shall take office on July 1 following their election.
  2. Any vacancy occurring in the office of highway commissioner, other than by expiration of the term of office, shall be determined by the remaining highway district commissioners using the criteria established in section 59-901, Idaho Code. If it is determined that a vacancy has occurred, the commissioners shall declare there is a vacancy and such vacancy shall be filled by the highway district board and be for the balance of the term of the person replaced. If the remaining highway district commissioners are unable to agree on a person to fill the vacancy within thirty (30) days after the vacancy occurs, the chairman of the county commissioners of the county with the largest number of electors in the highway district shall then become a member of the highway district board for the purpose of filling the vacancy only. If a majority of the highway district board so constituted shall be unable to agree upon a person to fill the vacancy within thirty (30) days, or if two (2) or more vacancies shall occur in the board of highway commissioners at one time, a special election to fill the vacancy shall be called and held in the same manner provided by law for the holding of elections for highway commissioners, except that the date of the election shall be as soon as possible, and all duties imposed by law upon the highway district board in connection with elections shall be performed by the county commissioners.
  3. When there are two (2) or more vacancies on the highway district board at the same time, the chairman of the county commissioners, along with the additional county commissioners that the county commission chairman appoints, and with the remaining highway district commissioner, if applicable, shall constitute a temporary board of highway district commissioners. The temporary board of highway district commissioners shall perform the duties required by law of a highway district board of commissioners until the newly elected highway commissioners take office.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1304, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 123, § 2, p. 274; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 3, p. 894; am. 2006, ch. 165, § 1, p. 499; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 74, p. 993; am. 2011, ch. 11, § 23, p. 24; am. 2017, ch. 212, § 1, p. 515.

STATUTORY NOTES
Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 165, divided and designated the former first paragraph as subsections (1) and (2); inserted “shall be determined by the remaining highway district commissioners using the criteria established in section 59-901, Idaho Code. If it is determined that a vacancy has occurred, the commissioners shall declare there is a vacancy and such vacancy” in present subsection (2); and designated the former last paragraph as subsection (3).

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, at the end in subsection (1), substituted “shall take office on the date specified in the certificate of election but not more than sixty (60) days following their election” for “shall take office on October 1 following their election”

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 11, substituted “July 1” for “the date specified in the certificate of election but not more than sixty (60) days” near the end of subsection (1).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 212, in subsection (2), substituted “thirty (30) days” for “ten (10) days” near the beginning of the last two sentences.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

Section 27 of S.L. 2011, ch. 11 declared an emergency retroactively to January 1, 2011 and approved February 23, 2011.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1305. Election of highway commissioners — Term of office.

  1. On the third Tuesday of May of the next odd-numbered year following the appointment of the first highway district commissioners, commissioners from subdistricts one and two shall be elected for a term of two (2) years and the commissioner from subdistrict three shall be elected for a term of four (4) years. Thereafter the term of office of all commissioners shall be four (4) years.
  2. A highway district whose terms and election were established by prior law shall convert to the election of commissioners as provided in subsection (1) of this section.

Each highway commissioner shall be elected on a districtwide basis.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1305, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 123, § 3, p. 274; am. 2002, ch. 298, § 1, p. 853; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 75, p. 993; am. 2010, ch. 185, § 13, p. 382; am. 2010, ch. 197, § 1, p. 420.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in subsection (1), in the first sentence, substituted “third Tuesday of May” for “first Tuesday of August” and deleted the last three sentences, which read: “Highway district commissioners elected prior to January 1, 1994, for a term to expire on January 1, 1996, shall continue in office until October 1, 1995. Highway district commissioners elected prior to January 1, 1994, for a term to expire on January 1, 1998, shall continue in office until October 1, 1997. Elections for commissioners of each of the subdistricts shall continue on the schedule previously established.”

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 185, in the first sentence in subsection (1), added “and the commissioner from subdistrict three shall be elected for a term of four (4) years”; and rewrote subsection (2), revising provisions for election of highway commissioners.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 197, deleted the former second paragraph in subsection (2), which read: “If an alternative election is held pursuant to this subsection, the highway district shall not revert to the former manner of elections and terms of office until eight (8) years after such election.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

Section 2 of S.L. 2010, ch. 197 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Defectively Organized District.

Legal existence of highway district defectively and irregularly organized could not be questioned in collateral attack by a private citizen, where it had functioned as such for over two (2) years. Oregon Short Line R.R. v. Kimama Hwy. Dist., 287 F. 734 (D. Idaho 1923), aff’d, 298 F. 431 (9th Cir. 1924).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1305A. Election administration.

Highway district elections shall be conducted in accordance with the general laws of the state, including the provisions of chapter 14, title 34, Idaho Code. The county commissioners shall select polling places and the county clerk shall appoint election judges and clerks.

The county clerk shall conduct the elections for a highway district and shall perform all necessary duties of the election official of a highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1305A, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 4, p. 274; am. 2008, ch. 258, § 1, p. 751; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 76, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2008 amendment, by ch. 258, in the first paragraph, rewrote the first sentence, which formerly read: “Highway district commissioners shall have authority to administer highway district elections in accordance with the provisions of this chapter,” and deleted the former last sentence, which read: “In all matters not specifically covered by this chapter, the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code, shall govern the procedure for highway district elections.”

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1305B. Board of commissioners — One nomination — No election.

In any election for a highway district commissioner, if after the deadline for filing a declaration of intent as a write-in candidate, it appears that only one (1) qualified candidate has been nominated for a subdistrict to be filled, it shall not be necessary for the candidate of that subdistrict to stand for election, and the board of highway district commissioners shall declare such candidate elected as commissioner, and the secretary of the highway district shall immediately make and deliver to such person a certificate of election signed by him and bearing the seal of the district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1305B, as added by 2009, ch. 98, § 1, p. 308.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1305B, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305B, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 5, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305C. Declaration of candidacy — Qualifications.

  1. Candidates for election as a highway district commissioner shall be nominated by nominating petitions, each of which shall bear the name of the nominee, the subdistrict for which the nomination is made, the term for which nomination is made, bear the signature of not less than five (5) electors of the candidate’s specific subdistrict, and be filed with the election official of the highway district. The form of the nominating petition shall be as provided by the county clerk. The nomination shall be filed not later than 5:00 p.m. on the sixth Friday preceding the election for which the nomination is made. The election official shall verify the qualifications of the nominee, and shall not more than seven (7) days following the filing certify the nominees to be placed on the ballot.
  2. A nominee shall qualify for the office of highway district commissioner if such nominee:
    1. Has attained the age of twenty-one (21) years at the time of his election; and
    2. Is a citizen of the United States; and
    3. Is a resident of the highway district commissioner’s subdistrict for which he seeks office.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1305C, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 6, p. 274; am. 2006, ch. 165, § 2, p. 499.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 165, inserted “Qualifications” at the end of the section heading; designated the former paragraph as subsection (1); and added subsection (2).

§ 40-1305D. Notice of election filing deadline. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305D, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 7, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305E. Notice of election. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305E, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 8, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305F. Board of commissioners — One nomination

No election. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305F, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 9, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305G. Write-in candidates. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305G, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 10, p. 274; am. 1998, ch. 307, §/1, p. 1012, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305H. Absentee ballots. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305H, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 11, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305I. Conduct of election on election day. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305I, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 12, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305J. Canvass of votes. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305J, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 13, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305K. Comparison of poll lists, ballots and registration cards

Void ballots. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305K, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 14, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305L. Counting of ballots

Certificates of judges. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305L, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 15, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305M. Transmission of supplies to district office. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305M, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 16, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305N. Board of canvassers

Meetings. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305N, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 17, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305O. Board’s statement of votes cast. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305O, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 18, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305P. Certificates of election. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305P, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 19, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305Q. Tie votes. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305Q, as added by 1994, ch. 123, § 20, p. 274, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305R — 40-1305Z. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305AA, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305BB. Petition — Where filed. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305BB, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305CC. Ballot synopsis. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305CC, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305DD. Determination by magistrate court — Correction of ballot synopsis. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305DD, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305EE. Filing supporting signatures — Time limitations. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305EE, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305FF. Petition — Form. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305FF, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809; am. 2002, ch. 32, § 14, p. 46, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305GG. Petition — Size. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305GG, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305HH. Number of signatures required. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305HH, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305II. Canvassing petition for sufficiency of signatures — Notice. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305II, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305JJ. Verification and canvass of signatures — Procedure. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305JJ, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305KK. Fixing date for recall election — Notice. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305KK, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305LL. Response to petition charges. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305LL, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305MM. Destruction of insufficient recall petition. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305MM, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305NN. Invalid names — Record of. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305NN, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305OO. Conduct of election — Form of ballot. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305OO, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305PP. Ascertaining the result — When recall effective. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305PP, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305QQ. Enforcement provisions — Mandamus — Appeals. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305QQ, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305RR. Violations by signers. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305RR, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1305SS. Violations — Corrupt practices. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1305SS, as added by 1995, ch. 245, § 1, p. 809, was repealed by S.L. 2008, ch. 258 § 2. For present comparable provisions, see§ 34-1401 et seq.

§ 40-1306. Organization of highway commissioners — Meetings — Officers — Official bonds.

  1. Immediately after qualifying and appointment and after a highway district commissioner election and the newly elected commissioners take office, the highway commissioners shall meet and organize, shall elect a chairman from their number, and shall appoint a secretary and treasurer who may also be from their number. The offices of secretary and treasurer may be filled by the same person. Certified copies of all appointments, under the hand of each of the commissioners, shall be filed with the clerk of each of the counties in which the highway district is located and with the secretary of the highway district.
  2. As soon as practicable after organization, and when deemed expedient or necessary, the highway commissioners shall designate a day, hour and place at which regular meetings shall be held, which shall be within the district or at the county seat of the county in which the district is located. Regular meetings shall be held at least quarterly. A majority of the highway commissioners may exercise all of the powers of the board of highway district commissioners.
  3. The officers of the highway district shall take and file with the district secretary an oath for the faithful performance of the duties of their respective offices. The district treasurer shall on his appointment execute and file with the district secretary an official bond in an amount as may be fixed by the highway district commissioners, which shall not be less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), and shall from time to time execute and file any further bonds as required of the highway district commissioners in amounts fixed by them, which amounts shall be at least sufficient to cover the anticipated amounts of money coming into his hands, at any one (1) time, plus an additional twenty-five percent (25%).
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1306, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 4, p. 894.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Additional Bonds.

Requirement of additional bonds where it was certain that funds have or will exceed 80 per cent of bond already filed was not discretionary. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Failure to Appoint Treasurer.
Minutes of Board.

Failure to appoint treasurer at the first meeting of the board was not such violation of former law regarding organization of highway commissioners as to warrant removal of commissioners from office and infliction of the statutory penalty for failure to perform their duty, where they received no funds for over four months after meeting and then amounts received were small, since no possible harm could result therefrom to district or public. Sharp v. Brown, 38 Idaho 136, 221 P. 139 (1923). Minutes of Board.

Minutes of meeting of board must show claims that were considered, allowed or rejected. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Failure of the secretary of the board to sign the minutes did not necessarily invalidate them as evidence of board action. Mosman v. Mathison, 90 Idaho 76, 408 P.2d 450 (1965).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1306A, 40-1306B. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 130, § 1:

§ 40-1306C. Highway district records — Open to the public.

All records of the highway district are open to the public, except as provided by law. With respect to highway district records, chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code, provides definitions, procedure for the right to examine, requests for the examination, records exempt from disclosure, copy fees, separation of exempt and nonexempt records, enforcement rights, court orders and penalties.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1306C, as added by 1999, ch. 332, § 5, p. 894; am. 2011, ch. 302, § 5, p. 866; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 102, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 302, updated an internal reference in the text of the section in light of 2011 amendments in Title 9.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “sections 9-337 through 9-351”.

§ 40-1307. Highway districts are bodies corporate.

Every highway district organized as provided by law is a body politic and corporate, and as such has the power specified in this chapter and in other statutes, including the power of eminent domain, and powers as necessarily implied from those expressed. The power of a highway district lies in the highway commissioners or by agents and officers acting under their authority or authority of law. The name of the highway district designated in the order of the commissioners declaring the territory duly organized as a highway district, shall be the corporate name of the district, and it must be known and designated by that name in all actions and proceedings touching its corporate right, property and duties.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1307, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Character of District.

Highway districts were quasi-municipal corporations, not political municipalities, not created for purposes of government, but for a special purpose: namely, that of improving the highways within the district. Oregon Short Line R.R. v. Kimama Hwy. Dist., 287 F. 734 (D. Idaho 1923), aff’d, 298 F. 431 (9th Cir. 1924).

A highway district was not a political municipality, such as a city, but municipality created for the special purpose of assessing property for improvement of highways within district. Shoshone Hwy. Dist. v. Anderson, 22 Idaho 109, 125 P. 219 (1912); Fidelity State Bank v. North Fork Hwy. Dist., 35 Idaho 797, 209 P. 449 (1922); Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926).

A highway district was a separate taxing unit within Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 6, prohibiting legislature from imposing taxes for it either directly or indirectly through county in which it was situated. Idaho County v. Fenn. Hwy. Dist., 43 Idaho 233, 253 P. 377 (1926).

A highway district was quasi-municipal corporation and is body politic and corporate. Stark v. McLaughlin, 45 Idaho 112, 261 P. 244 (1927).

Highway districts were purely business and proprietary corporations. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

Eminent Domain.

Eminent domain proceedings, as authorized by law that provided that highway districts were bodies corporate and had eminent domain power, may be stayed pending appeal from condemnation order conditioned upon appellant’s filing indemnifying bond. Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 48 Idaho 592, 285 P. 481 (1929); Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 49 Idaho 603, 290 P. 717 (1930). Under law that provided that highway districts were bodies corporate and had power of eminent domain, a highway district was a body politic or corporate and, as such, had the power of eminent domain. State ex rel. McKelvey v. Barnes, 55 Idaho 578, 45 P.2d 293 (1935).

Tort Liability.

A highway district was liable for its torts and for injuries resulting from negligent construction or repair of its roads. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.
ALR.

Sufficiency of condemnor’s negotiations required as preliminary to taking in eminent domain, 21 A.L.R.4th 765.

Eminent domain — compensability of loss of view from owner’s property — state cases, 25 A.L.R.4th 671.

§ 40-1308. Power to levy taxes for comprehensive insurance, prosecuting and defending actions, judgments and liabilities.

Every highway district has the power to levy and collect taxes as necessary to:

  1. Pay for a comprehensive insurance plan as provided in section 6-927, Idaho Code;
  2. Defray all expenses of prosecuting and defending actions;
  3. Pay any judgments and liabilities incurred against it; and
  4. Pay for emergencies or calamities as provided in section 40-820, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1308, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 6, p. 894; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 2, p. 227.

CASE NOTES

Attorney Fees.

Highway district was entitled to attorney fees under§ 12-117 because it was a taxing district pursuant to§ 63-3101 and this section, and property owners’ tort, takings, and due process constitutional claims arising from highway maintenance lacked a reasonable basis. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Contracts and Obligations Validated.

The contracts, obligations and liabilities validated by former law that provided for ratification of prior contracts, obligations, liabilities and judgments were the contracts and obligations entered into and liabilities incurred in the conduct of the principal business for which highway districts are organized. Filer Hwy. Dist. ex rel. Alworth v. Shearer, 54 Idaho 201, 30 P.2d 199 (1934).

There was not the hint in the provisions of former law that provided for ratification of prior contracts, obligations, liabilities and judgments that the legislature intended to validate the purchase of land bank bonds, by the highway district, with sinking funds. Filer Hwy. Dist. ex rel. Alworth v. Shearer, 54 Idaho 201, 30 P.2d 199 (1934).

Since former law that provided for ratification of prior contracts, obligations, liabilities and judgments did not in any manner validate the purchase of land bank bonds, it follows that such section could not cure a defective notice to taxpayers of such purchase so as to invoke the statute of limitations so as to bar an action by the latter, attacking such purchase, more than three (3) years thereafter. Filer Hwy. Dist. ex rel. Alworth v. Shearer, 54 Idaho 201, 30 P.2d 199 (1934).

§ 40-1309. Corporate powers of highway districts.

Each highway district has power:

  1. To sue and be sued.
  2. To purchase and hold lands, make contracts, purchase and hold personal or real property as may be necessary or convenient for the purposes of this chapter, and to sell and exchange any real or personal property other than public lands which by the constitution and laws of the state are placed under the jurisdiction of the state land board. Personal or real property, no longer useful to the district, not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in value may be sold by the highway commissioners at a private sale or at any regular board meeting without advertisement. Before disposing of all other personal or real property exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in value, the highway district commissioners shall first conduct a public hearing for which notice shall be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, and at which hearing any person interested may appear and show cause that such personal or real property is still useful to the district and that the sale or exchange should not be made. Following testimony by all interested persons at the public hearing, the highway district commissioners may adopt a resolution finding that such personal or real property is no longer useful to the district and finding that such personal or real property should be sold or exchanged and establishing procedures for the sale of such personal or real property including, but not limited to, the date and time of the sale and whether the sale will be by live public auction, by receipt of sealed bids or by some other reasonably commercial means. The hearing and sale or exchange shall not be conducted at the same regular meeting and, except as otherwise provided by law, the only notice required for such sale or exchange shall be as set forth in section 74-204, Idaho Code. Provided however, that before the district disposes of surplus real property at public sale, the district shall first notify any person who owns real property that is contiguous with the surplus real property of the district that such person has first option to purchase the surplus real property for an amount not less than the current appraised value. If more than one (1) adjoining owner wants to purchase the surplus real property, a private auction shall be held for such parties. If no owner of adjoining property exercises his or her option to buy, the district may proceed to public sale. Highway district commissioners, highway directors, employees, and their families must be personally disinterested, directly or indirectly, in the purchase of property for the use of the highway district, or in the sale of any property belonging to the highway district, or in any contract made by the highway district or other person on behalf of the highway district unless otherwise authorized by law.
  3. To levy and apply ad valorem taxes for purposes under its exclusive jurisdiction as are authorized by law.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1309, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 324, § 3, p. 1039; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 7, p. 894; am. 2000, ch. 258, § 1, p. 729; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 3, p. 227; am. 2012, ch. 306, § 1, p. 847; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 103, p. 379; am. 2019, ch. 59, § 1, p. 149.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State land board,§ 58-101 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 306, in subsection (2), substituted “personal or real property” for “personal property” in the first and second sentences, deleted the mention of a resolution before a public hearing in the third sentence, and inserted sentences four and six through eight.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “74-204” for “67-2343” in the fifth sentence of subsection (2).

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 59, substituted “ten thousand dollars ($10,000)” for “five thousand dollars ($5,000)” near the beginning of the second and third sentences in subsection (2).

CASE NOTES

Governmental Immunity.

Because a highway district can sue and be sued, it cannot enjoy governmental immunity. Dalton Hwy. Dist. v. Sowder, 88 Idaho 556, 401 P.2d 813 (1965).

Utility Franchises.

The highway district legislation contained in title 40, chapter 14, and in this chapter does not supersede the well-established law vesting power to grant franchises to utilities in the cities. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1310. Powers and duties of highway district commissioners.

  1. The commissioners of a highway district have exclusive general supervision and jurisdiction over all highways and public rights-of-way within their highway system, with full power to construct, maintain, repair, acquire, purchase and improve all highways within their highway system, whether directly or by their own agents and employees or by contract. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter in respect to the highways within their highway system, a highway district shall have all of the powers and duties that would by law be vested in the commissioners of the county and in the district directors of highways if the highway district had not been organized. Where any highway within the limits of the highway district has been designated as a state highway, then the board shall have exclusive supervision, jurisdiction and control over the designation, location, maintenance, repair and reconstruction of it. The highway district shall have power to manage and conduct the business and affairs of the district; establish and post speed and other regulatory signs; make and execute all necessary contracts; have an office and employ and appoint agents, attorneys, officers and employees as may be required, and prescribe their duties and fix their compensation. Highway district commissioners and their agents and employees have the right to enter upon any lands to make a survey, and may locate the necessary works on the line of any highways on any land which may be deemed best for the location.
  2. The highway district shall also have the right to acquire either by purchase, or other legal means, all lands and other property necessary for the construction, use, maintenance, repair and improvement of highways in their system. The highway district may change the width or location, or straighten lines of any highway in their system, and if in the constructing, laying out, widening, changing, or straightening of any highways, it shall become necessary to take private property, the district director of highways, with the consent and on order of the highway district commissioners, shall cause a survey of the proposed highway to be made, together with an accurate description of the lands required. He shall endeavor to agree with each owner of property for the purchase of a right-of-way over the lands included within the description. If the director is able to agree with the owner of the lands, the highway district commissioners may purchase the land and pay for it out of the funds of the highway district, and the lands purchased shall then be conveyed to the highway district for the use and purpose of highways.
  3. Whenever the director of highways shall be unable to agree with any person for the purchase of land, or that person shall be unknown or a nonresident of the county in which the highway district is situated, or a minor, or an insane or incompetent person, the director shall have the right, subject to the order of the highway district commissioners, to begin action in the name of the highway district in the district court of the county in which the district is situated, to condemn the land necessary for the right-of-way for the highway, under the provisions of chapter 7, title 7, Idaho Code. An order of the highway district commissioners entered upon its minutes that the land sought to be condemned is necessary for a public highway and public use shall be prima facie evidence of the fact.
  4. The highway district has the power to contract for and pay out any special rewards and bounties as may appear expedient or useful in securing proper highway construction and maintenance, and to accept, on behalf of the district, aid or contributions in the construction or maintenance of any highway; to construct or repair, with the consent of the corporate authorities of any city within the district, any highway within a city, upon the division of the cost as may be agreed upon; or to join with the state or any body politic or political subdivision, or with any person in the construction or repair of any highway and to contract for an equitable division of the cost; and all counties, cities, highway districts and other bodies politic and political subdivisions are authorized to contract with any highway district acting through its highway district commissioners in exercise of the powers granted.
  5. The highway district has the power to receive highway petitions and lay out, alter, create and abandon and vacate public highways and public rights-of-way within their respective districts under the provisions of sections 40-202, 40-203 and 40-203A, Idaho Code. Provided however, when a public highway, public street and/or public right-of-way is part of a platted subdivision which lies within an established county/city impact area or within one (1) mile of a city if a county/city impact area has not been established, consent of the city council of the affected city, when the city has a functioning street department with jurisdiction over the city streets, shall be necessary prior to the granting of acceptance or vacation of said public street or public right-of-way by the highway district board of commissioners.
  6. The highway district is empowered to take conveyance or other assurances, in the name of the highway district, for all property acquired by it under the provisions of this chapter for the purposes of this title. The highway district may institute and maintain any and all actions and proceedings, suits at law and in equity, necessary or proper in order to carry out the provisions of this chapter, or to enforce, maintain, protect or preserve any and all rights, privileges and immunities provided in this chapter. In all courts, actions, suits or proceedings, the highway district may sue, appear and defend, in person or by attorneys, and in the name of the highway district.
  7. The highway district is empowered to hold, use, acquire, sell, manage, occupy and possess property. The highway district may create highway subdistricts, which must be carefully and distinctly defined and described. Highway subdistricts may be revised or modified by the highway district commissioners, as changes in conditions demand.
  8. The highway district board of commissioners shall have the exclusive general supervisory authority over all public highways, public streets and public rights-of-way under their jurisdiction, with full power to establish design standards, establish use standards, pass resolutions and establish regulations in accordance with the provisions of title 49, Idaho Code, and control access to said public highways, public streets and public rights-of-way.
  9. By July 1, 2000, and every five (5) years thereafter, the highway district board of commissioners shall have published in map form and made readily available the location of all public rights-of-way under its jurisdiction. Any highway district board of commissioners may be granted an extension of time with the approval of the legislature by adoption of a concurrent resolution.
History.

(10) In its discretion, the highway district may purchase equipment at a public auction, if the highway district board of commissioners has made a finding that such equipment may be purchased at a competitive price. Prior to the public auction, the highway district commissioners shall, at a regular meeting of the district or at a special hearing, notice of which is published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, review any documentation available as to the items to be auctioned at the public sale and determine which items the district may bid on, and establish a maximum amount the district will bid for such item. History.

I.C.,§ 40-1310, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 9, p. 803; am. 1993, ch. 412, § 8, p. 1505; am. 1994, ch. 324, § 4, p. 1039; am. 1998, ch. 184, § 3, p. 673; am. 1999, ch. 291, § 1, p. 722; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 8, p. 894; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 4, p. 227.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1999 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 1999 amendment, by ch. 291, inserted “acquire, purchase” following “construct, maintain, repair” in the first sentence of subsection (1).

The 1999 amendment, by ch. 332, in the first sentence of subsection (1), deleted “except as provided in section 40-1323, Idaho Code” following “highway district have”, inserted “and public rights-of-way” preceding “within their highway system”; in subsection (2), deleted “resident of the county in which the district is situated” following “endeavor to agree with each owner of property”; in subsection (7) substituted “subdistricts” for “divisions” in two places, substituted “revised” for “altered, changed, created”, substituted “changes in conditions demand” for “the need requires”; and in subsection (8), inserted “pass resolutions and” following “establish use standards”.

CASE NOTES

Abandonment.

A highway district, acting through its commissioners, has the power to abandon public highways following a public hearing. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Yacht Club of Coeur d’Alene, Ltd., 116 Idaho 219, 775 P.2d 111 (1989).

Where there was a valid common law dedication of a road, the fact that such road had not been worked or used for a period of five years did not constitute an abandonment thereof merely by virtue of former§ 40-104 (repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1). Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Yacht Club of Coeur d’Alene, Ltd., 116 Idaho 219, 775 P.2d 111 (1989).

Construction With Other Statutes.

While neither§ 7-707 nor this section purport to state whether it is the order of condemnation or the complaint initiating the eminent domain action that is determinative in defining what land or what rights are sought to be condemned,§ 7-707 is more specific and, thus, controlling. Ada County Hwy. Dist. v. Sharp, 135 Idaho 888, 26 P.3d 1225 (Ct. App. 2001).

If a city does not follow the procedures set forth for altering a highway district, it does not obtain jurisdiction over streets located inside of the district; therefore, a district court erred by granting a city’s motion for partial summary judgment in a case where the city sought to obtain jurisdiction over streets in a highway district by merely establishing a functioning street department. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

Litigation.

Decision to stipulate to a judgment concerning a road in a quiet title action was allegedly made by consensus but not at a public meeting, and the settlement was, in this case, a decision that required a vote for county action under§ 67-2341(1), given that, under§ 31-708, a county clerk was to record the vote of each member on any question upon which there was a division, and because§ 31-706 defined a quorum and subsection (6) of this section provided that any action carried out in litigation was to require a quorum; the executive session exception under§ 67-2345 did not apply because (1) no vote was made in a regular meeting to authorize such a session and (2) no final action or decision could have been made in such a non-public meeting. Farrell v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 378, 64 P.3d 304 (2002), overruled on other grounds, City of Osburn v. Randel, 152 Idaho 906, 277 P.3d 353 (2012).

Maintenance of Escape Ramps.

Based upon the definition of “highways” in§ 40-109(5), runaway escape ramps are, as a matter of law, part of the highway district road system, being roadside improvements, adjacent lands or interests lawfully acquired, pedestrian facilities, and any other structures, works or fixtures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the highways and under this section and§ 31-805, the highway district had a duty to maintain those runaway escape ramps as part of the highway district road system. Freeman v. Juker, 119 Idaho 555, 808 P.2d 1300 (1991).

Where there was a disputed question of fact over whether or not escape ramps had been maintained, summary judgment should not have been granted based upon the breach of a duty to maintain them. Freeman v. Juker, 119 Idaho 555, 808 P.2d 1300 (1991).

Power of Court.

Although§ 40-203 and this section contemplate a validation proceeding and action by the highway district, in a suit asserting tort and constitutional claims, the district court had power to determine that a road was a public highway by prescription, as defined by§ 40-202(3), and evidence of long-term public use and public maintenance supported that finding. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011).

Scope of Power.
Utility Franchises.

A county highway department’s exclusive jurisdiction over its highways and rights-of-way does not extend to matters that do not involve its legitimate interests, including whether a benefitting utility may require a third party to reimburse the utility for some or all of the costs of relocation of facilities belonging to the utility within a public right-of-way. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Idaho Pub. Utils., 151 Idaho 1, 253 P.3d 675 (2011). Utility Franchises.

This section expressly sets forth the specific powers and jurisdiction vested in highway commissions, and the authority to grant utility franchises is certainly not among the powers enumerated as being vested in a highway district. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Hwy. Dist., 126 Idaho 145, 879 P.2d 1078 (1994); Schneider v. Howe, 142 Idaho 767, 133 P.3d 1232 (2006).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Abandonment.

The power to abandon a road under law that provided for the powers and duties of highway commissioners was in the commissioners and not in the public as where a road is not worked or used for a period of five years. Mosman v. Mathison, 90 Idaho 76, 408 P.2d 450 (1965).

If a bridge was no longer necessary, a finding to that effect must have been made by the commissioners before it could be abandoned. Nicolaus v. Bodine, 92 Idaho 639, 448 P.2d 645 (1968).

Acceptance of Subdivision Plats.
Allowance or Rejection of Claims.

While former law regarding general powers and duties of highway commissioners appeared to grant highway districts exclusive jurisdiction over highways within their districts, it did not give them the power or duty to accept subdivision plats; under the law as it existed when subdivision was created (1973), county clearly had the authority to accept and approve the plat and the direct effect of that acceptance was to dedicate the thoroughfare to the public use. Harshbarger v. County of Jerome, 107 Idaho 805, 693 P.2d 451 (1984). Allowance or Rejection of Claims.

Board of commissioners was only body authorized to allow claims against district. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Claims must have been considered and allowed or rejected at meeting of board duly had. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Failure to consider, approve, or reject claims before they are paid was neglect of official duty for which officers may be removed. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Action of board in considering, allowing, or rejecting claim after it has been paid was nullity. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

Bonds and Tax Levy.

Board of county commissioners had the power to issue county bonds for bridges built in county outside of highway district and to levy taxes on the entire county for payment of such bonds, provided it was determined that that portion of county included in highway district was benefited by the building of such bridges. Reinhart v. Canyon County, 22 Idaho 348, 125 P. 791 (1912); Nampa Hwy. Dist. v. Canyon County, 30 Idaho 446, 165 P. 1126 (1917).

Constitutionality.

Former highway district law did not deprive owner of his property without due process of law or deny equal protection of law, either in the organization of a district or in the issuance or road and bridge bonds. Stark v. McLaughlin, 45 Idaho 112, 261 P. 244 (1927).

Elements of Negligence.

Negligence on part of highway district in regard to excavations in highway was failure to perform act that reasonably prudent man would, under like circumstances, perform. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926).

Eminent Domain.

Under the provisions of former law that provided for general powers and duties of the board of highway commissioners, highway district was entitled to intervene and be heard on questions of necessity and public good in condemnation proceedings. State ex rel. McKelvey v. Barnes, 55 Idaho 578, 45 P.2d 293 (1935).

Immune from Taxation.

Highway district was separate taxing unit within Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 6, prohibiting legislature from imposing taxes for it, either directly or indirectly through county in which it was situated. Idaho County v. Fenn Hwy. Dist., 43 Idaho 233, 253 P. 377 (1926).

Liability of Officers.

Highway officers were generally liable for injuries resulting from malfeasance or nonfeasance in performance of ministerial duties. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926).

Maintenance of Highways.

Highway commissioner was not liable for injuries on highway in absence of evidence of failure to exercise due care in selection of director of work or actual knowledge of negligence in its performance. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926). Maintenance of Highways.

Once thoroughfare was dedicated to the public it became a highway, and while, under former law regarding improvement of highways, it appeared that county must assume its maintenance since in counties with highway districts former laws regarding improvement of highways transferred the powers and duties over highways from the county commissioners to the highway board of the highway district, highway district had the duty to accept thoroughfare into its highway system and to begin providing maintenance; however, the decision to maintain it as a gravel road or to bring it up to the district’s minimum standards of highway construction rested within the discretion of the highway district. Harshbarger v. County of Jerome, 107 Idaho 805, 693 P.2d 451 (1984).

Necessity for Improvement.

Right to determine necessity for highway improvement for which land was sought by eminent domain proceedings was with highway district. Grangeville Hwy. Dist. v. Ailshie, 49 Idaho 603, 290 P. 717 (1930).

Highway commissioners must have repaired bridges found to be unsafe upon the request of two (2) or more taxpayers. Nicolaus v. Bodine, 92 Idaho 639, 448 P.2d 645 (1968).

Notice to Taxpayer.

Action of highway district commissioners ratifying the purchase, by its secretary, of land bank bonds, with sinking funds and entering the same on the minutes of proceedings of the board, but which minutes were not published, did not constitute notice to a taxpayer operating to bar his action to recover funds from the members of the board of highway commissioners more than three (3) years after such ratification. Filer Hwy. Dist. ex rel. Alworth v. Shearer, 54 Idaho 201, 30 P.2d 199 (1934).

Personal Interest of Commissioners.

As the commissioners were required to be elected from their subdistricts by the electors, of necessity each time that any maintenance work or construction work was done by their order, each of the commissioners would have been affected thereby by improvement of the highways or roads within the district and by the requirement of payment of taxes and, therefore, were not disqualified by personal interest from sitting on or voting on proceedings to abandon a road. Mosman v. Mathison, 90 Idaho 76, 408 P.2d 450 (1965).

Powers of Commissioners.

Highway district was not a political municipality created for governmental purposes, but its powers were specially limited to construction of highways for benefit of people and property therein, and its powers to tax were not unlimited. Oregon Short Line R.R. v. Kimama Hwy. Dist., 287 F. 734 (D. Idaho 1923), aff’d, 298 F. 431 (9th Cir. 1924); Shoshone Hwy. Dist. v. Anderson, 22 Idaho 109, 125 P. 219 (1912); Strickfaden v. Greencreek Hwy. Dist., 42 Idaho 738, 248 P. 456 (1926).

County commissioners, having no jurisdiction over construction of highways within organized districts, could not expend proceeds of county bond issue in territory embraced in highway district. Baker v. Gooding County, 25 Idaho 506, 138 P. 342 (1914).

Right of Property Owners.

In the area of construction, maintenance, and day-to-day operation of highways, the prerogative of the highway commissioners was exclusive. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Kootenai County, 104 Idaho 833, 663 P.2d 1135 (Ct. App. 1983). Right of Property Owners.

Under former law that provided for the powers and duties of highway commissioners where property owners abutting the block in which the approach to a subway under a railroad track was to be constructed were not parties to a contract for the construction of a subway, they had no right in it; neither were they entitled to compensation because of such construction, and they were not in a position to question the validity of a retroactive act of the legislature authorizing the execution of such contract, although the particular contract, prior thereto, had been adjudicated invalid in an action between the same parties. Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291, 53 P.2d 626 (1936).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1311. Jurisdiction of highway district commissioners.

In respect to all highways included within a highway district highway system, the power and jurisdiction of the highway district shall be inclusive. The highway district commissioners shall keep the highways in their system in proper repair, within the limits of the funds available to the highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1311, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1986, ch. 328, § 10, p. 803; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 9, p. 894.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Condemnation Actions.

Under former law regarding jurisdiction of highway commissioners and cognate legislation respecting highway districts, such district may have intervened in an action seeking to condemn land in the district by the state for highway purposes. State ex rel. McKelvey v. Barnes, 55 Idaho 578, 45 P.2d 293 (1935).

Jurisdiction of Commissioners.

Under the provisions of former law regarding jurisdiction of highway commissioners and former law that provided for general powers and duties of commissioners, the highway commissioners were vested with exclusive general supervision and jurisdiction over all highways within their districts, except as provided by former law regarding powers and duties of city council in cities, towns or villages located in the district and the county commissioners were precluded from entering into such districts for the purpose of building or repairing roads or bridges. Baker v. Gooding County, 25 Idaho 506, 138 P. 342 (1914).

Limitation of Tax Levy.

Board of county commissioners may have issued county bonds for bridges built in county outside of highway district and levied taxes on entire county for payment of such bonds, provided highway district was benefited by the building of such bridges. Reinhart v. Canyon County, 22 Idaho 348, 125 P. 791 (1912).

§ 40-1312. Grant of powers to be liberally construed.

The grant of powers provided in this chapter to highway districts and to their officers and agents, shall be liberally construed, as a broad and general grant of powers, to the end that the control and administration of the districts may be efficient. The enumeration of certain powers that would be implied without enumeration shall not be construed as a denial or exclusion of other implied powers necessary for the free and efficient exercise of powers expressly granted.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1312, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Scope of Power.

A county highway department’s exclusive jurisdiction over its highways and rights-of-way does not extend to matters that do not involve its legitimate interests, including whether a benefitting utility may require a third party to reimburse the utility for some or all of the costs of relocation of facilities belonging to the utility within a public right-of-way. Ada County Highway Dist. v. Idaho Pub. Utils., 151 Idaho 1, 253 P.3d 675 (2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
In General.

In the area of construction, maintenance, and day-to-day operation of highways, the prerogative of the highway commissioners was exclusive. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Kootenai County, 104 Idaho 833, 663 P.2d 1135 (Ct. App. 1983).

Intervention in Condemnation Action.

Under former law that provided that powers granted to highway districts should be liberally construed and cognate legislation respecting highway districts, such district might have intervened in an action seeking to condemn land in the district by the state for highway purposes. State ex rel. McKelvey v. Barnes, 55 Idaho 578, 45 P.2d 293 (1935).

Reports.
Review.

Under the provisions of former law that provided that powers granted to highway districts be liberally construed, the board of commissioners was acting within the scope of its powers in directing its secretary to make reports in conformity with former laws regarding general powers of commissioners and requirement of annual report and financial statement, and in subsequently ratifying such reports which then became reports of the board not subject to attack. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1922). Review.

The exercise of administrative discretion could not be totally free of proscription and former law regarding powers of highway commissioners recognized this principle by providing for judicial review of a decision to abandon a highway or bridge. Nicolaus v. Bodine, 92 Idaho 639, 448 P.2d 645 (1968).

§ 40-1313. District has legal title to property.

The legal title to all property acquired under the provisions of this chapter shall immediately, and by operation of law, vest in the highway district, and shall be held by the district in trust for, and is dedicated and set apart to the uses and purposes set forth in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1313, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1314. Compensation of highway district commissioners, officers, agents and employees.

  1. It shall be the duty of the board of highway district commissioners of each highway district to fix the annual salaries of the highway district commissioners commencing on October 1 and for the next ensuing year. The proposed commissioner salaries shall be published as a separate line item in the highway district’s annual budget.
  2. Actual expenses shall be paid in addition to their compensation. The payment for expenses shall be paid from the funds of the highway district upon the presentation of itemized vouchers, signed by the commissioners and under oath made to the secretary of the district.
  3. When a commissioner is an officer and/or agent of the district, the two (2) remaining commissioners may fix the salary and benefits to be paid him for his services as an officer and/or agent. A commissioner acting as an officer and/or agent of the district shall be entitled to his necessary and actual expenses in addition to his salary, but shall not be entitled to draw compensation as a commissioner when placed upon a salary. The board shall fix the salary and benefits to be paid to the other officers and agents and employees of the highway district, to be paid out of the treasury of the highway district.
  4. Commissioners are considered employees of the district. The district shall be liable and responsible for the actions of the commissioners, officers, agents and/or employees of the district when the commissioners, officers, agents and/or employees are performing their duties on behalf of the district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1314, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1990, ch. 296, § 1, p. 818; am. 1993, ch. 109, § 2, p. 278; am. 1997, ch. 378, § 1, p. 1208; am. 2001, ch. 44, § 1, p. 82; am. 2002, ch. 133, § 1, p. 364; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 5, p. 227.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Automobile Expense.

The reasonable value for use of an automobile was not an actual and necessary expense within the meaning of former law that provided for compensation and expenses of highway commissioners. Sanborn v. Pentland, 35 Idaho 639, 208 P. 401 (1922).

Office Rent and Notarial Services.

Claim for gasoline and oil used while transacting business for district was properly allowed even though the claim recited on its face that it was for “auto hire.” Choate v. North Fork Hwy. Dist., 39 Idaho 483, 228 P. 885 (1924). Office Rent and Notarial Services.

Commissioner was not entitled to claim compensation for office rent or services as notary, and a contract made with a commissioner relative to such items was void. Sanborn v. Pentland, 35 Idaho 639, 208 P. 401 (1922).

Railroad Fare.

Commissioner could not journey to another state on personal affairs and charge district with railroad fare in returning to attend meeting of board. Choate v. North Fork Hwy. Dist., 39 Idaho 483, 228 P. 885 (1924).

Recovery of Void Allowance.

Where commissioner had received compensation for matters not allowed by law, amount could have been recovered in action by taxpayer, where proper authorities refused to act. Sanborn v. Pentland, 35 Idaho 639, 208 P. 401 (1922).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1315. Cost of highways — Equitable division among benefited districts.

  1. In the laying out, alteration, construction, maintenance, repair or improvement of any highway or portion of it, within a county and not included within a highway district in a county which would also be for the benefit of the highway district, or included within a highway district which would also be for the benefit of a portion of the county or other highway districts not included in the highway district, and the cost would, if borne wholly by the highway district or the excluded portion, be an unjust or unreasonable burden, the highway district commissioners and the county commissioners shall have power to contract with each other for a division and apportionment of the cost of the work.
  2. In case they fail to agree, an action may be maintained in the district court between a highway district and the county, and the district court shall render a judgment as shall be just and equitable in respect to the division and apportionment of cost. All proceedings in the action shall be the same as in ordinary civil actions, with the same right of appeal and other rights and remedies as in an ordinary civil action by or against a body politic or political subdivision.
  3. Where a highway traverses two (2) or more highway districts, and the cost or burden would be inequitably distributed if each district assumed the cost of laying out, alteration, construction, improvement, maintenance or repair of that portion of the highway lying wholly within the district, the highway commissioners of the district affected have power to contract with each other for the division and apportionment of the cost of the work. If the highway also traverses portions of the county not included within any highway district, or if in the opinion of the commissioners the highway is of benefit to the county at large, a portion of the cost shall be borne by the county, and the commissioners and the respective highway district commissioners have power to contract with each other for the work.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1315, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Apportionment of Costs.

Where improvements were made for the benefit of highway district and territory of county not included within such district, and it would have been unjust for the excluded territory to assume the whole burden of the cost of the improvement, the district and board of county commissioners were given the power to contract each with the other for a division of the costs. Reinhart v. Canyon County, 22 Idaho 348, 125 P. 791 (1912). The provisions of former law regarding costs of highways and an equitable division among benefited districts of such costs and the relief afforded thereunder did not apply where the improvements made by a county were wholly beyond the boundaries of the highway district, and it was not claimed, in the action seeking contribution, that the costs were an unjust burden on the county. Nampa Hwy. Dist. v. Canyon County, 30 Idaho 446, 165 P. 1126 (1917).

Former law regarding cost of highways and an equitable division among districts of such cost was intended for the relief of the portion of a county not organized into a highway district by providing that highway district may be required to assume a part of costs for improvements extending outside boundaries of district. Nampa Hwy. Dist. v. Canyon County, 30 Idaho 446, 165 P. 1126 (1917).

Apportionment of Funds.

Former law regarding the costs of highways and the equitable division of such costs among benefited districts did not contemplate the raising of funds for purpose of constructing and repairing highways within highway districts by voting bonds upon the entire county, and then leaving it to the board of county commissioners to apportion the proceeds among the several districts. Baker v. Gooding County, 25 Idaho 506, 138 P. 342 (1914).

Legislative Intent.

In enacting former law regarding cost of highways and the equitable division of such costs among benefited districts, the legislature intended that, where improvements were made in territory for the benefit of county as well as highway district, then, in that event, the county should assume that portion of the cost commensurate with the benefits derived from such improvement. Reinhart v. Canyon County, 22 Idaho 348, 125 P. 791 (1912).

Tax Levy.

Board of county commissioners may levy and collect taxes against all the taxable property within county, including that within highway district, for payment of bonds, proceeds of which have been used for construction of bridges within county but outside of district. Nampa Hwy. Dist. v. Canyon County, 30 Idaho 446, 165 P. 1126 (1917).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1316. Annual report of highway district.

  1. On or before the first day of January in each year, the highway district shall make a report of the condition of the work, construction, maintenance and repair of all the highways within the district on the first day of October, accompanied by a map of the highways, together with other facts necessary for setting forth generally the situation and condition of the highways within the district.
  2. Reports shall be made in triplicate. One (1) report shall be filed in the office of the highway district, one (1) in the office of the board, and one (1) with the clerk of the commissioners.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1316, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Effect of Reports.

That maps attached to the annual report of the commissioners to the state board of highway directors (transportation board) and the county commissioners failed to show a road after its alleged abandonment was corroborative of the record showing such abandonment. Mosman v. Mathison, 90 Idaho 76, 408 P.2d 450 (1965).

Mandatory Compliance.

Preparation, filing, and publication of reports was mandatory. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

§ 40-1317. Annual financial statement of district — Audit.

  1. On or before the first day of January of each year, the highway district shall make and file in its office a full, true and correct statement of the financial condition of the highway district on the first day of October of the preceding year, giving a statement of the liabilities and assets of the highway district on the first day of October of the preceding year, and a copy of the statement shall be published in at least one (1) issue of some newspaper published in the county.
  2. All highway districts shall have an annual audit made of the financial affairs of the district as required in section 67-450B, Idaho Code, by the first day of January following the close of the preceding fiscal year.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1317, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1987, ch. 131, § 1, p. 262; am. 1993, ch. 387, § 10, p. 1417; am. 2007, ch. 287, § 1, p. 816.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 287, in subsection (1), substituted “January” for “November,” and twice inserted “of the preceding year”; and in subsection (2), substituted “January” for “December,” and inserted “preceding.”

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Limitation of Action by Taxpayer.

Under former law that required an annual financial statement of the district and other legislation relating to the subject, an action by commissioners of a highway district attempting to ratify the expenditure of funds by the secretary of the district in the purchase of land bank bonds, and an entry of such action on the minutes, which were not published, fell short of constituting notice to a taxpayer so as to bar his right of action to recover funds from the members of the board, more than three (3) years thereafter. Filer Hwy. Dist. ex rel. Alworth v. Shearer, 54 Idaho 201, 30 P.2d 199 (1934).

Sufficiency of Compliance.

Where reports did not altogether conform to law and were not published until after statutory date, it was not considered sufficient ground for removal from office. Walton v. Channel, 34 Idaho 532, 204 P. 661 (1921).

§ 40-1318. Inspection of records by commissioners. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1318, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1999, ch. 332, § 10, p. 894, effective July 1, 1999.

§ 40-1319. Director of highways — Appointment — Qualifications — Oath.

As soon as possible after the organization of a highway district, the highway district commissioners may appoint a director of highways. If a director of highways is not appointed his duties shall devolve upon the highway district commissioners. The director shall be skilled and experienced in the building, maintenance and repairing of highways and bridges. The term of office of the director, and his compensation, shall be fixed by the highway district commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1319, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 11, p. 894.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Right to Salary and Expenses.

Where there was no evidence that director failed to qualify under provisions of former law that provided appointment of director of highways, but it was in evidence that he acted for and was received by board in his official capacity, he would have been entitled to his salary and expenses legitimately incurred. Choate v. North Fork Hwy. Dist., 39 Idaho 483, 228 P. 885 (1924).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1320. Directors of highways — Deputy directors — Appointment — Duties.

The director may appoint, subject to confirmation and approval of the highway commissioners, one (1) deputy director for each subdistrict and as many additional deputy directors as the highway commissioners may determine to be advisable. It is the duty of the director of highways to give to any deputy directors specific instructions as to the highway work to be done, and shall ascertain if highway contractors in the district are complying or have complied with their contracts. The director shall require any deputy directors to keep and maintain all the highways in their charge in good repair, and shall, subject to the highway commissioners and as provided by law, exercise full and complete control over all highways and deputy directors of the district. The director shall submit reports to the highway district whenever required by the highway commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1320, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 12, p. 894.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1321. Deputy directors — Appointment

Duties. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1321, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1999, ch. 332, § 13, p. 894, effective July 1, 1999.

§ 40-1322. Creation of local improvement districts.

Highway districts are empowered to create local improvement districts for construction, reconstruction and maintenance of highways and accompanying curbs, gutters, culverts, sidewalks, paved medians, bulkheads and retaining walls within the boundaries of the highway districts. The organization and operation of local improvement districts shall be as nearly as practicable as prescribed in chapter 17, title 50, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1322, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1323. Cities included in highway districts — Powers and duties of city council.

  1. If any highway district shall include within its boundaries any incorporated city, or any portion of a city, the power of taxation on the part of the highway district as to ad valorem taxes, and in general all power of taxation or assessment, shall extend to and include the persons and property within the territory of the included city. The residents of the included territory shall be deemed for all purposes residents of the highway district, and entitled to vote at highway district elections to the same extent as other residents of the highway district. Nothing in this title shall be construed as affecting or impairing any power of taxation or assessment for local city highway purposes on the part of the authorities of the city of any included territory. Each incorporated city, or portion of it, within a highway district, shall constitute a separate division of the district. The city council of each incorporated city within the territory of a highway district, so far as relates to their city, shall have the powers and duties as provided by this chapter and as provided in chapter 3, title 50, Idaho Code, in such case.
  2. All the provisions of this title as to voting, taxation, assessments and bonding on the part of the highway district shall apply without change or discrimination to the persons and taxable property within the included territorial limits of a city.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1323, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 14, p. 894.

CASE NOTES

Functioning Street Department.

Where the district court specifically found the city did not have a functioning street department, the highway district had exclusive general supervisory authority to maintain the streets within the highway district. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Hwy. Dist., 126 Idaho 145, 879 P.2d 1078 (1994).

Legislative Intent.
Since § 50-1330 was added to the Idaho Code in 1983, and this section was added in 1985, the legislature must have intended to preserve the incorporated city’s ability to levy taxes and intended to preserve the city’s ability to maintain streets within its city limits and to allow a city to exercise this authority only if it has a functioning street department. To interpret it otherwise would effectively make the provisions of § 50-1330 regarding incorporated cities with functioning street departments a nullity. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Hwy. Dist., 126 Idaho 145, 879 P.2d 1078 (1994). Decisions Under Prior Law
Control of Streets and Highways.

City council or village trustees had exclusive control of streets and highways within corporate limits. City of Kellogg v. McRae, 26 Idaho 73, 141 P. 86 (1914).

Liability for Defective Streets.

Cities and villages incorporated under the general laws of the state were liable for negligent discharge of the duty imposed on them of keeping streets in a reasonably safe condition for travelers. Moreton v. St. Anthony, 9 Idaho 532, 75 P. 262 (1904).

Liability of Public Officials for Injuries.

Mayor of city of second class was not individually liable for maintenance of street in a reasonably safe condition and cannot be sued individually for damages for injuries sustained as the result of alleged failure of city to maintain warning sign of a dead end street. Lemmon v. Clayton, 128 F. Supp. 771 (D. Idaho 1955).

Complaint for personal injuries arising out of dead end street accident which alleges that injuries were proximately caused by the failure of the councilmen to maintain warning signs stated a cause of action against the councilmen. Lemmon v. Clayton, 128 F. Supp. 771 (D. Idaho 1955).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1324. Jurisdiction over included territory.

When a highway district is organized under the provisions of this chapter, it shall, except as otherwise provided, supersede all other highway districts or parts of districts within the limits of the highway district, and upon the organization the existing position of director of highways shall be abolished. After the organization of a highway district the highway commissioners have the exclusive power to levy and apply all bridge and highway taxes within the district. Where prior to the organization of a highway district bonds shall have been lawfully issued by the county including within its territory property afterward included within the highway district, the proper corporate authorities of the county shall continue to levy, collect and apply the taxes necessary to discharge the obligation of those bonds. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as affecting any power of any incorporated city, or portion of it, lying within the limits of a highway district, to issue bonds as empowered by law and to levy, collect or apply the necessary taxes for them.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1324, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1325. Adoption of budget — Public hearing.

Highway district commissioners shall, prior to certifying a property tax levy to the commissioners and a county assessor, as provided in subsections (1) and (3) of section 63-803, Idaho Code, adopt a budget and cause a public hearing to be held upon the budget.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1325, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 99, § 1, p. 309.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 99, substituted “certifying a property tax levy” for “certifying an ad valorem tax levy” and inserted “as provided in subsections (1) and (3) of section 63-803, Idaho Code, adopt a budget and cause a public hearing to be held upon the budget.”

§ 40-1326. Notice of budget hearing.

Notice of the budget hearing meeting shall be posted at least ten (10) full days prior to the date of the meeting in at least one (1) conspicuous place in each highway district and a copy of the notice shall also be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code. The place, hour and day of the hearing shall be specified in the notice, as well as the place where the budget may be examined prior to the hearing. A full and complete copy of the proposed budget shall be published with and as a part of the publication of the notice of hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1326, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1327. Public inspection of budget.

The budget shall be available for public inspection from and after the date of the posting of notice of hearing at a place and during business hours as the highway commissioners may direct.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1327, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1328. Quorum of highway commissioners at budget hearing — Objections.

A quorum of the highway commissioners shall attend the hearing and explain the proposed budget and hear any and all objections to it.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1328, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1329. Completion and finalization of budget. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1329, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 2009, ch. 99, § 2.

§ 40-1330. Fiscal year.

The fiscal year of the highway district shall commence on the first day of October of each year.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1330, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1331, 40-1332. [Reserved.]

Cities, with city highway systems, shall be responsible for the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of highways in their respective city systems, except as provided in section 40-607, Idaho Code. Cities may make agreements with a county, highway district or the state for their highway work, or a portion of it, but they shall compensate the county, district or state fairly for any work performed.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1333, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1999, ch. 332, § 15, p. 894.

CASE NOTES

Jurisdiction Over Streets.

If a city does not follow the procedures set forth for altering a highway district, it does not obtain jurisdiction over streets located inside of the district; therefore, a district court erred by granting a city’s motion for partial summary judgment in a case where the city sought to obtain jurisdiction over streets in a highway district by merely establishing a functioning street department. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1334. Every city a highway district

Powers and duties of city council. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1334, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1999, ch. 332, § 16, p. 894, effective July 1, 1999.

§ 40-1335. Standards for curb construction — Curb ramps for people with physical disabilities.

  1. The standard for construction of curbs on each side of any city highway, or any connecting highway for which curbs and sidewalks have been prescribed by the appropriate governing body, shall require curb cuts or ramps at locations which allow a crossing movement at intersections. Each curb cut or ramp shall be constructed to allow reasonable access to the crosswalk for people with physical disabilities.
  2. Standards set for curb cuts and ramps under this section shall apply to all new curb construction and to all replacement curbs constructed at any point in a block which gives reasonable access to a crosswalk.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1335, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 31, p. 542.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, in the section heading substituted “for people with physical disabilities” for “for the physically handicapped”; and in the last sentence in subsection (1), substituted “crosswalk for people with physical disabilities” for “crosswalk for physically handicapped persons.”

§ 40-1336. Record books to be kept.

The highway district board of commissioners must cause to be kept permanently and indefinitely:

  1. A minute book, in which must be recorded all orders and decisions made by them, and the proceedings at all regular and special meetings.
  2. An allowance book or disbursement journal, in which must be recorded all orders for the payment of money from the highway district treasury, to whom made, and on what account, dating, numbering and indexing the same through each year.
  3. A road book, containing all proceedings and adjudications relating to the validation and abandonment and/or realignment of highways, public streets and public rights-of-way within the highway district highway system.
  4. An ordinance book, containing all ordinances, stating the date enacted.
  5. A resolution book, containing all resolutions, stating the date adopted.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1336, as added by 1994, ch. 324, § 5, p. 1039.

§ 40-1337. Classification and retention of records.

  1. Highway district records shall be classified as follows:
    1. “Permanent records” shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: proceedings of the governing body, ordinances, resolutions, bond register, warrant register, budget records, general ledger, cash books, right-of-way use permits and records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon, and other documents or records as may be deemed of permanent nature by the highway district board of commissioners.
    2. “Semipermanent records” shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: claims, contracts, cancelled checks, warrants, duplicate warrants, purchase orders, vouchers, duplicate receipts, bonds and coupons, registration and other election records, financial records and other documents or records as may be deemed of semipermanent nature by the board of highway district commissioners.
    3. “Temporary records” shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: correspondence not related to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, cash receipts subject to audit, and other records as may be deemed temporary by the board of highway district commissioners.
    4. Those records not included in subsection (1)(a), (1)(b) or (1)(c) of this section may be classified as permanent, semipermanent or temporary by the board of highway district commissioners.
  2. Highway district records shall be retained as follows:
    1. Permanent records shall be retained for not less than ten (10) years.
    2. Semipermanent records shall be kept for not less than five (5) years after date of issuance or completion of the matter contained within the record.
    3. Temporary records shall be retained for not less than two (2) years.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1337, as added by 1994, ch. 324, § 6, p. 1039.

§ 40-1337A. Photographic or digital storage and use of highway district records.

  1. A highway district official may reproduce and retain documents in a photographic, digital or other nonpaper medium. The medium in which a document is retained shall accurately reproduce the document in paper form during the period for which the document must be retained and shall preclude unauthorized alteration of the document.
    1. If the medium chosen for retention is photographic, all film used must meet the quality standards of the American national standards institute (ANSI).
    2. If the medium chosen for retention is digital, the medium must provide for reproduction on paper at a resolution of at least two hundred (200) dots per inch.
    3. A document retained by the highway district in any form or medium permitted under this section shall be deemed an original public record for all purposes. A reproduction or copy of such a document, certified by the highway district official, shall be deemed to be a transcript or certified copy of the original and shall be admissible before any court or administrative hearing.
    4. Once a paper document is retained in a nonpaper medium as authorized by this section, the original paper document may be disposed of or returned to the sender.
    5. Whenever any record is reproduced by photographic or digital process as herein provided, it shall be made in duplicate, and the custodian thereof shall place one (1) copy in a fire-resistant vault, or off-site storage facility, and he shall retain the other copy in his office with suitable equipment for displaying such record at not less than original size and for making copies of the record.
  2. A highway district may incorporate an electronic version of another agreement by reference into a contract, if:
    1. The unsigned terms are stored in accordance with the provisions of this section;
    2. The signed contract contains a prominently displayed notification of the incorporation by reference; and
    3. The unsigned terms are readily available for inspection by the parties.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1337A, as added by 2015, ch. 117, § 1, p. 303.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviation enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 40-1305AA. Initiating recall proceedings — Statement — Contents — Verification — Definitions. [Repealed.]

§ 40-1333. Cities — Highway responsibility.

Chapter 14 SINGLE COUNTY-WIDE HIGHWAY DISTRICTS

Sec.

§ 40-1401. Election to establish district.

Any county may, at the discretion of the commissioners, or shall, upon a request in writing from ten percent (10%) or more of the qualified electors residing in each of the county commissioner subdistricts, hold an election at which the following question shall be submitted to the electorate: “Shall this county be served by one county-wide highway district for all city highways and county secondary highways?”. The election for this question shall be held at the next general election following a decision by the board of county commissioners for such an election or upon receipt of the qualified voters written requests to hold such election. At least one (1) public hearing shall be held by the board of county commissioners, prior to the election.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1401, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 1, p. 419.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 14 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1404. 1867, p. 64, § 4; R.S., § 1123; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1044; C.S., § 1472; I.C.A.,§ 39-1304.

40-1405. 1864, p. 440, § 10; am. R.S., § 1128; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1045; C.S., § 1473; I.C.A.,§ 39-1305.

40-1406. 1864, p. 440, § 13; R.S., § 1129; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1046; C.S., § 1474; I.C.A.,§ 39-1306.

40-1407. 1866, p. 179, § 2; R.S., § 1130; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1047; C.S., § 1475; I.C.A.,§ 39-1307.

40-1408. 1866, p. 181, § 1; am. R.S., § 1131; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1048; C.S., § 1476; I.C.A.,§ 39-1308.

§ 40-1402. Applicability of general election laws — Notice of election — Polling places — Canvassing vote

Payment of cost. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2009, ch. 341, § 77, effective January 1, 2011.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1402, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

A former§ 40-1402 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

§ 40-1403. Rejection of plan — Intervals for new elections.

In any county where the question fails of adoption, another election may be called and held by the submission of petitions, but any subsequent election shall be held not oftener than two (2) years after the holding of any election submitting the question to the vote of the electorate.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1403, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1403 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

§ 40-1404. Appointment of first highway district commissioners in certain countywide highway districts — Subdistricts — Elections, terms and salaries of commissioners.

For counties with a population of two hundred thousand (200,000) persons or less, if there is a majority affirmative vote at the election the county commissioners, at their next meeting shall organize the countywide highway district. The county shall be subdivided by the county commissioners into three (3) subdistricts, designated subdistricts number one, two and three, as nearly equal in population as practicable, and one (1) highway commissioner shall represent each subdistrict and be a resident of the subdistrict. The governor shall appoint the first countywide highway district commissioners. Where one (1) or more highway districts have been in existence at the time of the creation of the countywide highway district, the governor shall appoint, whenever practicable, at least one (1) of the former highway district commissioners as they shall qualify by reason of residence in the territorial limits of the subdistricts of the countywide highway district as a commissioner of the countywide highway district. County commissioners and city council members shall not be eligible to hold office as a countywide highway district commissioner. The originally appointed commissioners shall serve until the next general election when two (2) members shall be elected for two (2) years and one (1) member shall be elected for a term of four (4) years, the commissioner from subdistrict number one being elected for a term of four (4) years. The four (4) year term shall be allotted thereafter in rotation to subdistricts number two, three and one. A qualified voter of the countywide highway district shall be eligible to vote for each of the countywide highway district commissioners, and the election shall be conducted as provided by Idaho statutes relating to holding elections at the county level.

The highway commissioners shall take office on January 1 of the year immediately following their election, and each may be compensated in accordance with the provisions of section 40-1314, Idaho Code, or receive a salary not to exceed six hundred dollars ($600) per calendar month with the exception of the president of the highway commissioners who may receive a salary not to exceed seven hundred dollars ($700) per calendar month.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1404, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 2, p. 419; am. 1993, ch. 109, § 1, p. 278; am. 1998, ch. 300, § 1, p. 989; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 6, p. 227.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1404 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

Effective Dates.

Section 5 of S.L. 1998, ch. 300 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1998.

§ 40-1404A. Elections, terms and salaries of commissioners in certain countywide highway districts.

In countywide highway districts located in a county with a population of more than two hundred thousand (200,000) persons in which the voters have chosen to establish a countywide highway district at a previous election, the county shall be divided by the county commissioners immediately upon the effective date of this act into five (5) subdistricts which shall be as nearly equal in population as practicable. No precincts shall be divided. A highway district commissioner shall be a resident of the subdistrict which he represents. Voters in each subdistrict shall vote only for one (1) candidate seeking to represent that subdistrict. County commissioners, mayors and city council members shall not be eligible to hold office as a countywide highway district commissioner. At the election held in 1998, commissioners representing subdistricts two and five shall be elected for two (2) year terms and commissioners representing subdistricts three and four shall be elected for four (4) year terms. Thereafter, all commissioners shall be elected for four (4) year terms. Any incumbent in office on the effective date of this act may complete the term to which they were elected and shall represent the subdistrict in which they reside. Any incumbent in office on the effective date of this act whose term expires on January 1, 2000, shall retain that office until January 1, 2000, shall be assigned the subdistrict in which they reside by the county commissioners, which subdistrict shall be numbered one as provided in this section and that commissioner need not stand for election in 1998.

A qualified voter of the countywide highway district shall be eligible to vote for a countywide highway district commissioner residing in the elector’s subdistrict, and the election shall be conducted as provided by Idaho statutes relating to holding general elections at the county level.

The highway commissioners shall take office on January 1 of the year immediately following their election, and each may be compensated in accordance with the provisions of section 40-1314, Idaho Code, or receive a salary not to exceed one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200) per calendar month with the exception of the president of the highway commissioners who may receive a salary not to exceed one thousand four hundred dollars ($1,400) per calendar month.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1404A, as added by 1998, ch. 300, § 2, p. 989; am. 2001, ch. 44, § 2, p. 82; am. 2003, ch. 68, § 7, p. 227.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this act” in the first paragraph refers to the effective date of S.L. 1998, ch. 300, which was March 24, 1998.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1998, ch. 300, which is compiled as§§ 34-625, 34-625A, 40-1404, and 40-1404A.

§ 40-1404B. Vacancies — Filling a mid-term vacancy.

  1. Any vacancy occurring on the highway district board, other than by expiration of the term of office, shall be determined by the remaining highway district board using the criteria established in section 59-901, Idaho Code.
  2. If it is determined that a vacancy has occurred as provided in subsection (1) of this section, the remaining highway district board shall declare there is a vacancy and such vacancy shall be filled as herein provided:
    1. The remaining highway district board shall have thirty (30) days to appoint a person to fill the vacancy.
    2. If a majority of the remaining highway district board so constituted shall be unable to agree upon an appointment of a person to fill the vacancy before the expiration of the thirty (30) day period, the remaining highway district board shall submit a list of three (3) nominations to the governor within five (5) days.
    3. The governor shall fill the vacancy within ten (10) days by appointing a person having the qualifications set forth herein. In the event the remaining highway district board fails to submit a list of three (3) nominations as set forth in this section, the governor shall have an additional ten (10) days to fill the vacancy by appointing a person having the same qualifications at the time of the appointment as those provided by law for election to the office.
  3. The person selected shall be a person who possesses the same qualifications at the time of his appointment as those provided by law for election to the vacant office.
  4. The term of the appointment shall be for the balance of the term of the person replaced.
  5. Appointment pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be in writing and filed with the secretary of the highway district, the clerk of the county commissioners and the tax collector of the county.
  6. Any person appointed to fill a vacancy, after filing the official oath and qualifying for the official bond in accordance with the provisions of section 40-1405, Idaho Code, shall possess all the rights and powers, and is subject to all the liabilities, duties and obligations of the office filled.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1404B, as added by 2013, ch. 18, § 1, p. 28.

§ 40-1405. Organization of district — Officers — Official bonds.

  1. Immediately after appointment, the county-wide highway district commissioners shall meet and organize, elect a chairman from their number, and appoint a secretary and treasurer who may also be from their number, for terms fixed by them. The offices of secretary and treasurer may be filled by the same person. Certified copies of all appointments, under the hand of each of the commissioners, shall be filed with the clerk of the county commissioners and with the tax collector of the county.
  2. The officers of the highway district shall take and file with their secretary an oath for the faithful performance of the duties of their respective offices. Each highway commissioner and director shall execute an official bond in the sum of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000). The treasurer on his appointment shall execute and file with the secretary an official bond in an amount of money equal to an amount that may come into his hands as treasurer. If a surety bond is given as provided in section 41-2604, Idaho Code, the bond need not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), but in no case shall the amount of the bond be less than an amount set by the highway district commissioners.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1405, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1405 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

§ 40-1406. Powers and duties of highway commissioners — One highway district in county — Highway powers of cities in county abolished — Laws in conflict superseded.

The highway commissioners of a county-wide highway district shall exercise all of the powers and duties provided in chapter 13 of this title, and are empowered to make highway ad valorem tax levies as provided by chapter 8, of this title. Only one (1) county-wide highway district shall be operative within a county where the electorate has voted affirmatively for the formation of a county-wide highway district. The district shall specifically be responsible for all county secondary and city highways and is hereby recognized as a body politic of this state. No city included within a county-wide highway district shall maintain or supervise any city highways, or levy any ad valorem taxes for the construction, repair or maintenance of city highways. No highway district included within a county-wide highway district, shall maintain any secondary highways or levy any ad valorem taxes for the construction, repair or maintenance of highways. Wherever any provisions of the existing laws of the state of Idaho are in conflict with the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of this chapter shall control and supersede all such laws. However, within the limits of any city, the city may expend city funds for the placement, care and removal of trees, shrubs, grass, and other plants, which are located within the rights-of-way of any highway of the county-wide highway district.

History.

The commissioners of a county-wide highway district may pass ordinances, rules, and make all regulations, not repugnant to law, as necessary, for carrying into effect or discharging all powers and duties conferred to a county-wide highway district pursuant to this chapter and chapter 13 of this title. All ordinances created or passed by the commissioners of a county-wide highway district shall require the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the full county-wide highway district commission. The style of all ordinances shall be: “BE IT ORDAINED by the board of highway district commissioners of (. . . . . . . .) County, Idaho.” All ordinances passed shall, before they take effect and within one (1) month after they are passed, be published in at least one (1) issue of a newspaper published in the county or, if no paper be published in the county, then in some paper having general circulation therein. After such publication and before its effective date, such proposed ordinance shall not thereafter be amended in any particular wherein the amendment shall impose terms, conditions or privileges less favorable to the county-wide highway district than the proposed ordinance as published; but amendment favorable to the county-wide highway district may be made at any time and after publication. All ordinances passed pursuant to this section by the board of county-wide highway district commissioners may be proved by a certificate of the secretary of the county-wide highway district under the seal of the board of the county-wide highway district commissioners and shall be read and received in evidence in all courts and administrative proceedings without further proof. If ordinances duly passed are printed or published in book or pamphlet form by authority of the county-wide highway district commissioners, the printed or published book or pamphlet shall also be read and received in evidence in all courts and administrative proceedings without further proof. The commissioners of the county-wide highway district may enforce such ordinances by all appropriate administrative or judicial proceedings. History.

I.C.,§ 40-1406, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 298, § 1, p. 942.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1406 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

CASE NOTES

Legislative Intent.

This section cannot be construed to suggest that the legislature bestowed authority on a highway district to grant franchises to public utilities; such an interpretation is clearly contrary to the grant of powers given to the highway districts by the legislature. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

Utility Franchises.

The highway district legislation contained in title 40, chapter 13, and this chapter, does not supersede the well-established law vesting power to grant franchises to utilities in the cities. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

Highway district’s reliance upon this section as the basis for asserting that it supersedes the law controlling utility franchises is misplaced, as the language of this section is primarily in reference to imposition of ad valorem taxes and cannot be extended to replace the constitutional and statutory provisions controlling utility franchises. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

It is undisputed that municipal corporations have the power to operate their own utility systems and provide water, power, light, gas and other utility services within the city limits, and the constitutional and statutory grant of franchise authority to the cities in this respect is not nullified or altered by this section. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

§ 40-1406A. Summarization of ordinances permitted — Requirements.

  1. In lieu of publishing the entire ordinance under section 40-1406, Idaho Code, the highway district may publish a summary of the ordinance, which summary shall be approved by the governing body and which shall include:
    1. The name of the highway district;
    2. The formal identification or citation number of the ordinance;
    3. A descriptive title;
    4. A summary of the principal provisions of the ordinance, including penalties provided and the effective date;
    5. Any other information necessary to provide an accurate summary; and
    6. A statement that the full text is available at the highway district office.
  2. Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, whenever any publication is made under this section and the proposed or adopted ordinance contains legal descriptions or contains provisions regarding taxation or penalties concerning real property, those sections containing such information shall be published in full and shall not be summarized. In the case of a legal description of real property, the notice shall also include the street address or addresses of the property described, if any. In the case of a description covering one (1) or more street addresses, the street addresses of the corners of the area described shall meet this requirement. Maps may be substituted for a written legal description of property provided such maps contain sufficient detail to clearly define the area with which the ordinance is concerned.
  3. Before submission of a summary to a newspaper for publication under this section, the legal advisor of the highway district shall sign a statement, which shall be filed with the ordinance, that the summary is true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public.
  4. The full text of any ordinance which is summarized by publication under this section shall be promptly provided by the highway district clerk to any citizen on personal request.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1406A, as added by 2001, ch. 334, § 1, p. 1176.

§ 40-1407. Dissolution of existing districts or systems — Transfer of funds.

In any county where the electorate adopts a county-wide highway district under the provisions of this chapter and at the time of reorganization of the district, city highway systems, highway districts, and/or county highway systems already exist, the commissioners shall dissolve those districts or systems and transfer all funds to the reorganized county-wide highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1407, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 3, p. 419.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1407 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1408. Expense of notices and dissolution proceedings.

The expense of all notices and proceedings in relation to the dissolution of a city highway system, highway district and/or county highway system shall be chargeable to and borne by each respective city highway system, highway district and/or county highway system dissolved.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1408, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 4, p. 419.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1408 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1401.

§ 40-1409. Expenses of election.

In all counties where elections are held under the provisions of this chapter, county commissioners shall pay expenses of the elections from the election fund of the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1409, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 78, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1410. Existing systems and districts — Transfer — Liability.

  1. When a county-wide highway district has been adopted, all city highway systems, highway districts and county highway departments shall prepare an inventory and financial statement and file the statement with the commissioners not later than ten (10) days subsequent to the canvass of the election.
  2. Title to all machinery, buildings, lands and property of every kind and nature, belonging to each city highway system, highway district and county highway system shall immediately upon the dissolution of the system or district and without further conveyance, be vested in the commissioners as custodians, and immediately thereafter, as soon as may be practical, delivered to the succeeding county-wide highway district and the district shall be liable for any and all unliquidated obligations of dissolved city highway systems, highway districts or county highway systems.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1410, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 5, p. 419.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1411. Apportionment of funds to pay debts of dissolved districts.

Each year after its dissolution and until all indebtedness, including outstanding warrants of a dissolved system or district shall have been fully paid, it shall be the duty of the succeeding county-wide highway district in which the districts were situated, to apportion for the benefit of any dissolved county or city highway system, or highway district that portion of moneys arising out of the highway users’ moneys and the moneys from all other sources as the system or district would be entitled to receive had it not been dissolved. The treasurer of the succeeding county-wide highway district shall place the moneys to the credit of the county-wide district in a special fund in the county treasury with other funds belonging to the district, the funds to be used for payment of the dissolved system’s or district’s bonded or funded indebtedness.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1411, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1412. Control of bridges and highways in dissolved systems and districts — Sidewalks — Special assessments.

  1. After the dissolution of any county highway system, city highway system or highway district, the county-wide highway district of the county in which the dissolved system or district was situate, shall have the same control over all bridges and highways of the system or district as is vested in the commissioners, highway district commissioners or city councils as provided for in section 40-801, Idaho Code.
  2. A county-wide highway district may provide by general ordinance for the construction, repair, replacement or removal of sidewalks which are deemed by the highway district commissioners to be dangerous and unsafe, and assess the costs as provided in subsection (3) of this section to the property in front of which the same shall be constructed, repaired or laid.
  3. All special assessments levied to which the provisions of this chapter are made applicable shall be due and payable to the treasurer of the county-wide highway district, and if not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of notification of assessment, shall be declared delinquent, be certified to the tax collector of the county by the district treasurer, and shall be placed by the tax collector upon the tax roll and collected in the same manner and subject to the same penalties as other taxes. All money received on special assessments shall be held by the treasurer as a special fund to be applied to the payment of the improvement for which the assessment was made, and the money shall be used for no other purpose than to reimburse the highway district for money expended for the improvement.
  4. The tax collector of the county shall pay on demand to the treasurer all money received by him arising from ad valorem taxes or assessments levied.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1412, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1413. Balance of funds of dissolved system or district — Disposition — No funds to city.

  1. After final payment of all expenses of proceedings and of all legal claims, liabilities, bonded and other indebtedness in relation to dissolution of a dissolved system or district, and after liquidation and winding up of the affairs of the system or district, all surplus moneys of the dissolved district remaining in the special fund of the dissolved city highway system, highway district and/or county highway department shall immediately be delivered to the treasurer of the county-wide highway district.
  2. No city whose incorporated limits lie wholly or partially within the boundaries of a dissolved highway district shall be entitled to receive any share of the moneys of the dissolved highway district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1413, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1988, ch. 221, § 6, p. 419.

§ 40-1414. Creation of local improvement districts.

In addition to the powers granted to county-wide highway districts under the provisions of this chapter, the districts are empowered to create local improvement districts for construction, reconstruction and maintenance of highways and accompanying curbs, gutters, culverts, sidewalks, paved medians, bulkheads and retaining walls within the boundaries of the highway districts.

The organization and operation of the local improvement districts shall be as nearly as practicable as prescribed in chapter 17, title 50, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1414, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1415. Responsibilities of single county-wide highway districts within cities — Final decision on urban renewal projects — Settlement of questions.

  1. County-wide highway districts organized under the provisions of this chapter, within the limits of any city shall be responsible for the design, construction, reconstruction and maintenance of city rights-of-way and accompanying curbs, gutters, culverts, sidewalks, paved medians, bulkheads and retaining walls. Within city rights-of-way, design, construction, reconstruction and maintenance shall include:
    1. Traffic and safety engineering for both motorist and pedestrian traffic;
    2. Procurement and installation of highway lighting where it is primarily of benefit to the motorist. Energy costs and maintenance of lighting shall subsequently be a function of the city;
    3. Procurement, installation, operation and maintenance of traffic control devices where they are needed for traffic control; and
    4. Drainage where it is necessary for motorist safety or necessary for right-of-way maintenance.
  2. Acquisition and acceptance of rights-of-way shall be the responsibility of the county-wide highway district.
  3. In matters of urban renewal projects, the city involved shall make the final decision concerning approval of the project based on the overall plan of the city. Prior to approval of an urban renewal project, the city shall submit the plan to the highway district for review and recommendations in accordance with subsection (1) of this section. The highway district shall submit its written recommendations with respect to the proposed urban renewal plan to the city within thirty (30) days after receipt of the plan for review. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the highway district, or if no recommendations are received within thirty (30) days, then the city may proceed without recommendations with the hearing on the proposed urban renewal project, and the highway district shall be responsible, as between the city and the highway district, for funding the district’s responsibilities as provided by subsection (1) of this section. Agreements entered into by a city pursuant to an urban renewal project prior to dissolution of the city highway system and organization of the successor highway district shall be binding upon the county-wide highway district.
  4. The highway district shall be responsible for planning and location of rights-of-way. In planning for and determining location of rights-of-way, the highway district shall submit to the appropriate planning agency the proposed location of the rights-of-way. In locating rights-of-way the highway district shall take into consideration the comprehensive general plan of the appropriate county or city planning agency. In planning for the location of rights-of-way, the highway district shall comply with all appropriate provisions of chapter 65, title 67, Idaho Code.
  5. The city shall retain jurisdiction and responsibility for outstanding local improvement district bonds or warrants sold or issued by the city prior to dissolution of the city highway system and organization of the successor highway district.
  6. All subdivision plats required to be submitted for acceptance and approval to the city and the county under the provisions of chapter 13, title 50, Idaho Code, shall be submitted to the highway district for consideration for acceptance and approval as to continuity of highway pattern, widths, drainage provisions, right-of-way construction standards, traffic flow, the traffic volume demand occasioned by the proposed subdivision either within or without the boundaries of the proposed subdivision, and other matters pertaining to the function of the highway district.
  7. Within the limits of any city, the city may expend city funds for the placement, care and removal of trees, shrubs, grass, and other plants, which are located within the rights of way of any highway of the county-wide highway district.
  8. A city, after advising the board of highway district commissioners of its intent, shall be responsible for the placement, care and removal of any parking meters within the limits of any city, and for the enforcement of ordinances regulating the use of parking meters, which are located within the rights-of-way of any highway of the county-wide highway district. The city shall be entitled to all of the revenues received from parking meters.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1415, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1416. Authorization for voters to approve vehicle registration fee.

  1. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 49-207, Idaho Code, the voters of any county in which a countywide highway district is organized pursuant to chapter 14, title 40, Idaho Code, may authorize the countywide highway district to adopt a resolution by a majority vote of the countywide highway district commissioners to implement and collect a motor vehicle registration fee not to exceed two (2) times the amount established in section 49-402, Idaho Code. The authorization to adopt, implement, and collect a vehicle registration fee may be made by the registered voters of the county only at a general election held in even-numbered years, and a simple majority of the votes cast on the question shall be necessary to authorize the fee.
  2. In any election, the resolution submitted to the county voters shall:
    1. State the exact rate of the fee; and
    2. State the duration of the fee.
  3. Any countywide highway district authorized to adopt a resolution for a vehicle registration fee shall contract with the department for the collection, distribution, and administration of the fee in like manner, and under the definitions and rules for the collection and administration of other registration fees as set forth in chapter 4, title 49, Idaho Code. Monthly, following receipt by the department of revenues from the implementation of a vehicle registration fee, the department shall remit the same to the countywide highway district implementing such fee, less a deduction for such amount as may be agreed upon between the department and the commissioners of the countywide highway district, for the department’s actual costs for collection and administration of the fee. The vehicle registration fee shall not become part of the state highway account or state highway distribution account.
  4. The countywide highway district must use the funds generated by a vehicle registration fee exclusively for the construction, repair, maintenance, and traffic supervision of the highways within its jurisdiction, and the payment of interest and principal of obligations incurred for said purposes.
  5. Sections 49-405, 49-408, 49-416, 49-404, 49-409, 49-415 and 49-410, Idaho Code, shall be subject to the provisions of this section.

No rate shall be increased and no duration shall be extended without the approval of the voters, by the same simple majority of the votes cast.

An election to approve or disapprove the adoption of a vehicle registration fee may be called for by the adoption of a resolution by a majority vote of the countywide highway district commissioners. Any costs incurred to conduct the election for the district shall be paid by the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1416, as added by 1986, ch. 260, § 1, p. 679; am. 1987, ch. 125, § 1, p. 255; am. 1988, ch. 265, § 571, p. 549; am. 1991, ch. 285, § 2, p. 733; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 79, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES
Cross References.

State highway account,§ 40-702.

State highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the last sentence in subsection (2), deleted “shall be a charge against the district, and” following “district” and substituted “county” for “district”; in the first sentence in subsection (3), deleted “and regulations” following “rules”; and, in subsection (5), deleted “code” preceding “section.”

Effective Dates.

Section 586 of S.L. 1987, ch. 265 provided that the act should become effective on and after January 1, 1989.

Section 4 of S.L. 1991, ch. 285 declared an emergency and provided that the act should be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval retroactive to January 1, 1991. Approved April 4, 1991.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1417. Application of campaign reporting law to county-wide highway district elections. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2019, ch. 288, § 22, effective January 1, 2020. See§ 67-6601 et seq.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1417, as added by 1997, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1060.

§ 40-1418. Proceedings for dissolution of existing single countywide highway district.

All proceedings for the dissolution of single countywide highway districts shall be initiated by a petition of ten percent (10%) or more of the qualified electors residing in each of the county commissioner subdistricts, addressed to the commissioners of the county in which the single countywide highway district is situate, and which shall concisely state the grounds or reasons for the dissolution and contain a request for a hearing of the petition. A hearing on the petition shall be conducted pursuant to sections 40-1803 through 40-1805, Idaho Code. Following the hearing on the petition, the election and process for dissolution shall be conducted as provided in title 34, Idaho Code. The election shall be held at the next general election and in the event a majority of the qualified electors at the election vote in favor of dissolution, the commission shall immediately make and enter an order declaring the single countywide highway district dissolved.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1418, as added by 2004, ch. 361, § 1, p. 1081; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 80, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, substituted “title 34, Idaho Code” for “sections 40-1806 through 40-1821, Idaho Code” in the third sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

Chapter 15 CONSOLIDATION OF HIGHWAY DISTRICTS

Sec.

§ 40-1501. Highway districts — Consolidation — Effect of consolidation.

Any highway district within the state, whether the same are situated entirely within the boundaries of any one (1) county or within two (2) or more adjoining counties, may be consolidated with any adjoining highway district, whether situated entirely within the boundaries of any county or within two (2) or more adjoining counties.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1501, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 2, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising former chapter 15 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1502. 1905, p. 237, §§ 5, 10; compiled R.C., § 1053; compiled and reen. C.L., § 1053; C.S., § 1481; I.C.A.,§ 39-1405.

40-1504. 1905, p. 237, § 6, and parts of §§ 5, 9; compiled R.C., § 1054; am. 1911, ch. 67, § 1, p. 189; reen. C.L., § 1054; C.S., § 1483; I.C.A.,§ 39-1407; am. 1933, ch. 163, § 3, p. 291.

40-1505. 1905, p. 237, § 7; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1055; C.S., § 1484; I.C.A.,§ 39-1408.

40-1506. 1905, p. 237, § 8, and first part of § 9; compiled R.C., § 1056; am. 1909, § 1, p. 172; am. 1915, ch. 12, § 1, p. 48; reen. C.L., § 1056; C.S., § 1485; I.C.A.,§ 39-1409; am. 1963, ch. 294, § 3, p. 774.

40-1507. 1905, p. 237, § 11; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1057; C.S., § 1486; I.C.A.,§ 39-1410.

40-1508. 1905, p. 237, § 13; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1059; C.S., § 1488; I.C.A.,§ 39-1412.

40-1509. 1905, p. 237, § 14; reen. R.C. & C.L., § 1060; C.S., § 1489; I.C.A.,§ 39-1413.

49-1510, 49-1511. 1931, ch. 219, §§ 1, 2, p. 425; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1414, 39-1415.

49-1512, 49-1513. 1931, ch. 221, §§ 1, 2, p. 425; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1416, 39-1417.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-1502. Petitions for consolidation.

  1. Whenever electors of two (2) or more existing adjoining highway districts desire to consolidate those districts, a petition from each of the districts for consolidation, signed by five percent (5%) or twenty-five (25) electors, whichever is greater, qualified to vote at a highway district election in each of the highway districts, shall be presented to the commissioners of the county in which the highway districts are situated. The petitions shall state the name and, in a general way, describe the highway districts which it is proposed to consolidate.
  2. A majority of the elected commissioners of each of two (2) or more existing adjoining highway districts may also, on their own initiative, petition the county commissioners, in lieu of a petition as provided in subsection (1) of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1502, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 3, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1502 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1503. Order for hearing — Notice.

The commissioners of the counties concerned, shall at the earliest possible date, meet at a time and place as shall be agreed upon by them, and at the meeting shall, by order, entered in the minutes of the commissioners of each of the counties concerned, fix a time and place for a hearing upon the petitions, which time shall not be less than sixty (60) days from and after the date of the first publication of notice of the petition and hearing on them. The hearing meeting shall be at the county seat of one of the counties concerned. At the meeting the commissioners shall prepare a notice of hearing to be signed by them and attested by the county clerks, setting forth the filing of petitions; the name and general description of the highway districts proposed to be consolidated; the total bonded and current warrant and other indebtedness; the market value for assessment purposes and the last preceding ad valorem tax levy of each of the highway districts; a statement that at the hearing any elector qualified to vote at elections of highway district commissioners of the highway districts proposed for consolidation may, prior to or at the time of the hearing, file with the clerk of the commissioners of the county in which he resides, written objections to the proposed consolidation; and that at the hearing any qualified elector of the highway districts proposed for consolidation may appear and make oral objections to the consolidation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1503, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 4, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1503 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

§ 40-1503A. Jurisdiction of commissioners of good road districts over good roads district systems. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1503A, as added by 1963, ch. 294, § 2, p. 774, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-1504. Publication of notice.

The clerk of commissioners of each of the counties concerned shall cause to be published a copy of notice as provided by section 40-206, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1504, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 40-1504 was repealed. See Compiler’s notes,§ 40-1501.

§ 40-1505. Hearing — Order for election — Consolidation, when defeated.

At the time and place specified in the notice, the county commissioners shall proceed to consider the petition and all written and oral objections, and shall hear all qualified persons in relation to it. Upon conclusion of the hearing, which may be continued from day to day, if a majority of the members of each of the commissioners of the counties involved are of the opinion that a consolidation is practical and to the best interests of each and all of the highway districts concerned, they shall make an order directing that the question of consolidation of the highway districts proposed for consolidation be submitted to the electors at an election to be held separately within each of the highway districts at a date in conformance with section 34-106(1), Idaho Code, but not less than ninety (90) days after the date of the order. The date of the election shall be specified in the order. The order shall set forth: the name, number, and general description of the respective highway districts proposed to be consolidated; the market value for assessment purposes of all the property situated in each of the concerned highway districts, as shown by the last county assessment rolls; the total bonded and current warrant and other indebtedness of each of the highway districts; the preceding ad valorem highway tax levy of each of the highway districts; and the total bonded and current warrant and other indebtedness of the proposed consolidated highway district. A copy of the order shall be entered in the minutes of the commissioners of each county concerned. The proposed consolidation shall be defeated if a majority of the commissioners of either of the counties concerned vote against it, and in that event a record of that action shall be entered in the minutes of each of the counties concerned.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1505, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 5, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1505 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1506. Polling places — Election officers.

The commissioners of each county concerned shall meet within thirty (30) days, in either special or regular session and, by order, enter in their minutes and designate the polling places in each of the concerned highway districts situated in the county, and the county clerk shall appoint judges.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1506, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 6, p. 502; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 81, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1506 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, inserted “the county clerk shall” and deleted “two (2) or more” preceding “judges” and “and one (1) or more clerks for each polling place, who shall possess the qualifications necessary to entitle them to vote at an election of highway district commissioners in the highway district proposed for consolidation” from the end.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1507. Notice of election — Publication and contents.

The commissioners of each county shall require its county clerk to give notice of the election in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code. In addition, the notice shall state the purpose and date of the election, the hours during which the polls shall be open and list the polling places, in addition to the following: the name and general description of the respective highway districts proposed to be consolidated; the market value for assessment purposes of all the property situated in each of the concerned highway districts, as shown by the last county assessment rolls; the total bonded and current warrant and other indebtedness of each of the highway districts; the preceding property highway tax levy of each of the highway districts; and the total bonded and current warrant and other indebtedness of the proposed consolidated highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1507, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 7, p. 502; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 82, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1507 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the first sentence, inserted “county,” deleted “by causing notices to be posted in at least three (3) public places within each of the highway districts situated within the county and concerned in a proposed consolidation for at least twenty one (21) days prior to the date of election, and in addition to the posting, shall cause a copy of the notice to be published” following “give notice of the election,” and substituted “title 34, Idaho Code” for “section 40-206, Idaho Code”; and, in the last sentence, added “In addition,” deleted “and the qualifications required of voters” following “polling places,” and substituted “property highway tax levy” for “ad valorem highway tax levy.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1508. Elections — Time of holding.

An election held under the provisions of this chapter shall be held in each of the highway districts and counties affected by the proposed consolidation and shall be held on the same day and conducted in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1508, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 8, p. 502; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 83, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1508 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, deleted “separate and distinct” following the first occurrence of “shall be,” inserted “held,” and substituted “shall be held on the same day and conducted in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code” for “shall be held on the same day and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1509. Conduct of elections.

  1. The polls shall be presided over by the appointed judges and clerks who must take an oath as judge and clerk of the highway district election and which oath shall obligate the judges and clerks to faithfully perform the duties of a board of election.
  2. All elections shall be by secret and separate ballot, each ballot in type, print or legible writing, stating in the affirmative and negative the proposition to be voted upon, and all ballots shall be in a form that the voters may express a choice by the marking of a cross (X).
  3. In all elections it is intended that no informalities in conducting the election shall invalidate the election, if the election has been otherwise fairly conducted. The clerks of the county commissioners shall prepare the necessary ballots for use in each of the highway districts.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1509, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 9, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1509 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1510. Defeat of proposal — Subsequent elections.

The failure to carry the proposal to consolidate highway districts by at least a majority vote in any one (1) of the highway districts concerned shall defeat the entire proposal. Subsequent elections to consolidate highway districts having failed to be consolidated as provided in this chapter shall not be considered for consolidation under the provisions of this chapter for a period of four (4) years after the consolidation election.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1510, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 10, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1510 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

§ 40-1511. Count of votes — Canvass — Order for consolidation.

Immediately following the close of the polls, the votes shall be counted in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code. The board of county commissioners shall meet separately at their respective county seats and pursuant to chapter 12, title 34, Idaho Code, canvass the returns within each county. Within fifteen (15) days after the canvass, the commissioners shall meet in joint session at a location as shall be agreed upon by them and compile the total votes cast in their respective counties for or against the proposal to consolidate the highway districts concerned. If the proposal carried in each of the highway districts concerned, the county commissioners in the joint meeting shall make and enter an order declaring the districts consolidated in one (1) highway district of a name or designation as may be ordered by them, and at that time the consolidation shall be effective. The highway districts having been consolidated shall remain in operation, with all legal authority of a highway district, until the newly appointed highway commissioners of the consolidated highway district meet and organize as provided in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1511, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 11, p. 502; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 84, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1511 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1512. Subdivision of district — Appointment of highway commissioners — Consolidation, when effective.

At the joint meeting, as provided by section 40-1511, Idaho Code, by a majority vote of all the commissioners present, the territory consolidated in one (1) highway district shall be divided into three (3) subdistricts, as provided by section 40-1304, Idaho Code. Highway commissioners for the consolidated highway district shall be appointed by the governor, as provided for by section 40-1303, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1512, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 12, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1512 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1513. Highway district laws applicable — Exceptions — Tax levies.

After the consolidation is effective, statutes relating to highway districts shall be applicable to the joint consolidated highway district, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. The assessing of property, the levying and collection of ad valorem taxes and all accounts which from their nature should be separately kept, shall be done and kept and the report on them made as if each portion of the consolidated district were a separate highway district in the respective counties. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as preventing the new highway district board from levying ad valorem taxes against property within the consolidated district in accordance with chapter 8, title 40, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1513, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 13, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1513 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1514. Organization of highway district commissioners — Computation of indebtedness of former districts.

Immediately after consolidation is effected and highway commissioners are appointed, they shall meet and organize as provided by law, appoint required officers and designate a time and place for their meetings and have and exercise all the powers, jurisdiction, and authority and perform all duties and be subject to the responsibilities and liabilities of a highway district as provided by law. Upon organization, the highway district shall ascertain and compute all indebtedness, including bonded, warrant and current indebtedness, separately, of each of the former highway districts comprising the consolidation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1514, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 14, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1514 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1501.

§ 40-1515. Property and moneys of former districts — Delivery to consolidated highway district.

All property rights of the former highway districts shall be vested in and become the property of the consolidated highway district. The highway district commissioners and officers of each of the former highway districts comprising the consolidated highway district shall, immediately after consolidation is effected and the consolidated highway district commissioners have met and organized, turn over and deliver to them all property of every kind and description belonging to the former highway districts, including all moneys, books and accounts.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1515, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 15, p. 502.

CASE NOTES

Cited

Daugharty v. Post Falls Hwy. Dist., 134 Idaho 731, 9 P.3d 534 (2000); City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1516. Separate accounts of funds and proceeds from former highway districts — Duties of treasurer.

The highway district treasurer shall keep separate accounts of all moneys coming into his hands from each of the former highway districts, together with all moneys received from special tax levies against the taxable property situated within the boundaries of the former highway districts and together with all moneys paid out upon the indebtedness of the former highway districts. He shall pay from the funds in the accounts the amounts as the highway commissioners may from time to time order.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1516, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 16, p. 502.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1517. Funding of indebtedness of former highway districts.

If the consolidated highway district commissioners determine that valid outstanding indebtedness of any of the former highway districts, existing prior to the consolidation may be funded or refunded to the profit and benefit of the taxpayers within the boundaries of the former highway district, and without incurring any additional liability, the highway commissioners have the power and authority to make provision for issuing of funding or refunding bonds in an amount equal to the unpaid principal and interest on the outstanding bonds or other indebtedness. Before the highway commissioners shall issue any bonds to refund any outstanding indebtedness, it shall cause all moneys of the former highway district on hand available for the payment and discharge of any indebtedness to be applied in payment and discharge of them and issue funding or refunding bonds only for the remainder of the indebtedness. The issuance of bonds shall not create any liability against the consolidated highway district or any of the property within its boundaries, excepting that the property within the boundaries of the former highway district shall be liable for the payment of the bonds.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1517, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 17, p. 502.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1518. Indebtedness prior to consolidation — Liability of property in former highway districts.

It is expressly provided that property situated within the boundaries of a former highway district shall be liable for the indebtedness of that district existing prior to consolidation, but shall not be liable for the indebtedness of any other highway district forming a consolidation and existing prior to the consolidation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1518, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 202, § 18, p. 502.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Assessment for Taxation by District.

Where a new highway district was formed out of territory in another district, it was the duty of the commissioners to levy a tax on the annual assessed valuation of the old districts, and not on the assessed valuation at the time of the formation of the new district; such levy was for the purpose of payment of the bonded indebtedness of the old district. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 55 Idaho 400, 42 P.2d 1007 (1935).

Contribution from New District.

Where district was separated, the original district was entitled to contribution from the successor for expense in administering payment of the bonds outstanding at time of separation, since the separated portion of the original district would have borne its share had there been no separation. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

Estoppel.

Where two (2) districts were organized to take over part of a third district and the first participated with the latter in the disposition of auto license fees and used ad valorem taxes to pay its share of outstanding bonds and the latter, with full knowledge and acquiescence of former, used part of its license fees to pay its share, the former was estopped from complaining because all the fees were not used before an ad valorem levy was made. Murtaugh Hwy. Dist. v. Twin Falls Hwy. Dist., 65 Idaho 260, 142 P.2d 579 (1943).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1519. Expenses of election.

In all counties where highway district consolidation elections are held under the provisions of this chapter, county commissioners shall pay expenses of the elections from the election fund of the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1519, as added by 2000, ch. 202, § 19, p. 502; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 85, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the section catchline, deleted “Proration to highway districts — Appeals” from the end; substituted “election fund” for “general fund” and deleted the last two sentences, which dealt with prorated expenses and appeals procedure.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

Chapter 16 DETACHMENT OR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY

Sec.

Detachment
Annexation

DETACHMENT

§ 40-1601. Districts subject to detachment.

A portion of the territory of an existing highway district, whether the district is situated wholly in one (1) county or in two (2) or more counties, may be detached from the highway district as provided in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1601, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

The following sections comprising part of former chapter 16 of title 40 were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1603. 1917, ch. 61, § 3, p. 190; am. C.L. 62:6b; am. 1919, ch. 74, § 1, p. 258; C.S., § 1497; I.C.A.,§ 39-1510.

40-1604. 1911, ch. 55, § 7, p. 124; reen. C.L. 62:7; C.S., § 1499; I.C.A.,§ 39-1512.

40-1605. 1911, ch. 55, § 8, p. 125; reen. C.L. 62:8; C.S., § 1500; am. 1925, ch. 195, § 1, p. 362; am. 1927, ch. 31, § 4, p. 40; I.C.A.,§ 39-1513; am. 1980, ch. 89, § 1, p. 193.

40-1606. 1911, ch. 55, § 9, p. 125; reen. C.L. 62:9; C.S., § 1501; am. 1925, ch. 195, § 2, p. 362; I.C.A.,§ 39-1514; am. 1947, ch. 22, § 1, p. 20; am. 1978, ch. 77, § 1, p. 152.

40-1607. 1911, ch. 55, § 12, p. 126; am. 1913, ch. 146, § 1, p. 512; am. 1917, ch. 147, p. 462; reen. C.L. 62:12; am. 1919, ch. 170, p. 542; C.S., § 1504; I.C.A.,§ 39-1517.

40-1608. 1911, ch. 55, § 13, p. 127; reen. C.L. 62:13; C.S., § 1505; I.C.A.,§ 39-1518.

40-1610. 1911, ch. 55, § 14, p. 127; reen. C.L. 62:14; C.S., § 1506; I.C.A.,§ 39-1520; am. 1959, ch. 31, § 1, p. 67.

40-1611. 1911, ch. 55, § 15, p. 127; reen. C.L. 62:15; C.S., § 1507; I.C.A.,§ 39-1521; am. 1935 (2d E.S.), ch. 8, § 1, p. 17; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 34, p. 61; am. 1982, ch. 304, § 1, p. 765.

40-1612. 1911, ch. 55, § 16, p. 129; reen. C.L. 62:16; am. 1919, ch. 164, p. 532; C.S., § 1508; am. 1923, ch. 77, § 1, p. 86; am. 1929, ch. 136, § 1, p. 225; I.C.A.,§ 39-1522.

40-1613. 1911, ch. 55, § 17, p. 129; reen. C.L. 62:17; am. 1919, ch. 12, § 1, p. 74; C.S., § 1509; I.C.A.,§ 39-1523.

40-1618. 1911, ch. 55, § 22, p. 130; reen. C.L. 62:22; C.S., § 1514; am. 1925, ch. 98, § 1, p. 144; I.C.A.,§ 39-1528; am. 1941, ch. 64, § 1, p. 124; am. 1963, ch. 290, § 28, p. 757; am. 1975, ch. 112, § 1, p. 231; am. 1984, ch. 138, § 1, p. 327. 40-1619. 1911, ch. 55, § 23, p. 130; reen. C.L. 62:23; C.S., § 1515; I.C.A.,§ 39-1529.

40-1620. 1911, ch. 55, § 24, p. 130; reen. C.L. 62:24; C.S., § 1516; I.C.A.,§ 39-1530; am. 1980, ch. 61, § 7, p. 118; am. 1980, ch. 350, § 18, p. 887.

40-1621. 1911, ch. 55, § 25, p. 131; reen. C.L. 62:25; C.S., § 1517; I.C.A.,§ 39-1531; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 35, p. 61.

40-1622. 1911, ch. 55, § 26, p. 131; reen. C.L. 62:26; C.S., § 1518; I.C.A.,§ 39-1532; am. 1973, ch. 259, § 1, p. 511; am. 1977, ch. 91, § 1, p. 185.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1602. Petition.

Whenever electors of a portion of the territory embraced in any existing highway district desire that their portion be detached from the highway district, a petition describing the territory by its boundaries, signed by not less than twenty-five (25) electors qualified to vote at a highway district election and residing in the territory sought to be detached shall be presented to the commissioners of the county where the greatest portion of the highway district is located.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1602, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1602 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1603. Order for hearing upon petition.

Immediately upon its next regular meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose, the commissioners shall by order or resolution fix a time and place for a hearing of the petition, which time shall not be less than twenty-one (21) days from and after the date of the first publication of the notice of the petition and of the hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1603, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1603 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1604. Notice of hearing and petition.

The commissioners shall require their clerk to have a notice published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, setting forth the fact that a petition has been filed with the commissioners. The notice shall state the name of the highway district from which territory is proposed to be detached; a concise general description of the territory so proposed to be detached and its boundaries; the current bonded and current warrant indebtedness of the district; a notice of the time and place when and where the petition will be heard by the commissioners; and notice that any elector qualified to vote at an election of the district may, prior to or at the time of the hearing, file with the clerk of the commissioners written objections to the proposed detachment of the territory.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1604, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1604 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1605. Hearing — Order for election.

At the time and place specified in the notice, the commissioners shall proceed to consider the petition and all written objections filed with them and shall hear all persons in relation to it. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, which may be continued from day to day, if the commissioners shall determine that the detachment from the highway district of the territory described in the petition is practicable and to the best interests of the territory and of the highway district, they shall enter an order directing that the question of the detachment of the territory be submitted to the qualified electors of the district at an election to be held within the district on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code, which is not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of the order.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1605, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 86, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1605 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, substituted “held within the district on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code, which is not less than thirty (30) days from and after the date of the order” for “held within the district at a date not less than thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days from and after the date of the order.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1605A. Appointment to fill vacancy. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1605A, as added by 1982, ch. 269, § 1, p. 700, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-1606. Election officers and polling districts — Notice of election.

The county clerk shall appoint judges for the election; the commissioners shall by order establish polling places; and the county clerk shall provide notice of the election in accordance with the provisions of section 34-1406, Idaho Code. The notice shall state the date and purpose of the election, the boundaries of the territory proposed to be detached from the highway district, the places of holding the election, the various polling districts if the election is to be held in more than one (1) place, the qualifications required of voters, and the hours during which the polls shall be open.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1606, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 87, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1606 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the first sentence to the extent a detailed comparison is impracticable and, in the last sentence, deleted “which shall be between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.” from the end.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1607. Election procedure.

The qualifications of voters at the elections, the conduct of elections, the counting of the votes, the return of the ballots, and the payment of expenses of the election shall be as prescribed in title 34, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1607, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 88, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1607 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, substituted “title 34, Idaho Code” for “sections 40-1808 through 40-1810, Idaho Code.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1608. Order declaring territory detached.

If upon the canvass of the returns of the election the commissioners shall find that a majority of the votes cast in the district are in favor of the detachment from the highway district of the territory embraced in the proposal for detachment, they shall immediately make and enter an order declaring that territory detached from the district to the extent and for the purposes set forth.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1608, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1608 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1609. Effect of detachment of territory — Apportionment of indebtedness.

The detachment of territory from the district shall be deemed to relate only to the operations of the district subsequent to the order of detachment. Territory detached and all taxable property in that territory shall be and remain liable for the proportionate share of all bonded, warrant, and other indebtedness incurred by the district prior to the time of detachment. The proportionate share of the indebtedness of the district incurred prior to the order of detachment to be borne by the detached territory is hereby established and shall be determined and computed as follows:

  1. The highway district commissioners shall, at the meeting at which an order of detachment is made, compute the total aggregate market value for assessment purposes of the property within the district for the preceding year, and shall separately compute the total aggregate market value for assessment purposes for the preceding year of all the property within the territory detached from the district.
  2. The highway district commissioners shall compute and determine as of the date of the order of detachment the cash and solvent credits owing to the district and the value of the highway equipment and other personal property owned by it at the time of the detachment of territory, all of which property shall be retained by the district.
  3. The proportion of the outstanding indebtedness of the district incurred prior to the withdrawal of territory for which the withdrawn territory shall be and remain liable is the proportion that the aggregate market value for assessment purposes of the property within the withdrawn territory bears to the market value for assessment purposes of the property within the entire highway district as shown by the assessment rolls of the preceding year, less credit for the proportionate share or interest of the withdrawn territory in the cash, solvent credits, and personal property of the district, that share being based upon the proportion that the market value for assessment purposes of the property within the detached territory for the preceding year bears to the market value for assessment purposes of the total property within the entire district for the year.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1609, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1609 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1610. Detached territory subject to county levies.

After the detachment of any territory from a highway district the property within the detached portion shall be subject to taxation by the county for highway and other purposes to the same extent precisely as if it had never been included in the highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1610, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1610 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1611. Validity of outstanding bonds and warrants not affected.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as impairing the validity of any bonds or warrants of a highway district outstanding at the time of the detachment of any territory.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1611, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1611 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1612, 40-1613. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1612 and 40-1613 were repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

ANNEXATION

§ 40-1614. Territory disannexed from another county or adjacent to an existing highway district and within the county.

Any area not within a highway district, but within a territory previously detached from a county and annexed to another county, and adjacent to a highway district organized before annexation and situate wholly within the county to which the territory has been annexed, and any area not within a highway district, which is adjacent to an existing highway district and situate wholly within the county within which the highway is located, may be added to, and included in, the highway district upon the approval of its highway commissioners and the order of the commissioners of the county in which the highway district is situated.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1614, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1614 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

CASE NOTES

Cited

Floyd v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 137 Idaho 718, 52 P.3d 863 (2002); City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1615. Petition for annexation.

  1. The proceedings for inclusion shall be initiated by petition of twenty per cent (20%) of the qualified electors in the area proposed to be annexed to and included within the highway district. The petition shall accurately describe the boundaries of the area to be annexed, and shall state the name and identify the highway district to which the annexation is sought, and shall be accompanied by a map showing and distinguishing the boundaries of the highway district and the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed to the highway district.
  2. Proposals for the annexation of territory consisting entirely of public lands, or of a combination of public lands and privately held lands but which have no qualified electors to initiate a petition, may be initiated by petition of the highway commissioners of the district to which the proposed annexation is to be made.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1615, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1615 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1616. Required exhibits in connection with petition.

The petition, accompanied by a map and also by a certified copy of a resolution of the highway commissioners of the highway district approving and consenting to the inclusion and annexation shall be filed with the clerk of the commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1616, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1616 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1617. Hearing on petition — Notice.

Upon the filing of petitions, the commissioners shall fix a time for hearing the petition and shall cause a notice to be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, and shall describe the area proposed to be annexed to the highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1617, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1617 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1618. Objections to petition — Hearing.

Any qualified elector in the area to be annexed, and any qualified elector of the highway district, may file objections to the petition and may be heard at the hearing. Objections must be filed prior to or at the time of the hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1618, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1618 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1619. Approval or rejection of petition.

Upon the hearing of the petition the commissioners may approve or reject the petition. The commissioners, upon the approval of the highway commissioners, may modify the area described in the petition.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1619, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1619 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1620. Order of annexation.

If the commissioners shall find that the annexation by the highway district is for the best interests of the highway system in the county, then the commissioners shall order that the area, or any modifications of it made by the commissioners, shall be annexed to the highway district, and an order shall be entered in the minutes of the commissioners, and the area shall then constitute and be a part of the highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1620, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1620 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1621. Filing of certified copies of order.

The commissioners shall cause one (1) certified copy of the order to be filed for record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the highway district is situate, and shall transmit a certified copy of the order to the highway commissioners of the highway district to which the area is annexed.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1621, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1621 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1622. Effect of annexation.

The area annexed to the highway district shall be placed by the highway commissioners of the district into the subdistrict or subdistricts of the district as they shall determine and shall be subject to taxation for the payment of all of the outstanding obligations of the district existing at the time of annexation, and subject to taxation as all other lands of the district for the operation of the highway system of the district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1622, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1622 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1623. Contesting proceedings — Time limit.

After the order of annexation is made by the commissioners, the validity of the proceedings shall not be affected by any defect in the petition or in the number or qualification of its signers, and no action shall be commenced or maintained or defense made affecting the validity of the annexation after six (6) months from and after the making and entering of the order by the commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1623, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1623 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1624. Annexation of contiguous territory.

Additional territory adjoining a highway district and lying contiguous with and within one (1) or more counties may be added to and be included in the district, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors of the additional territory voting on the question at an election held for that purpose, which vote shall be taken at an election on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code. Additional territory shall not be annexed to or included in the district unless annexation and inclusion shall be first approved by the commissioners of the county in which the area proposed to be annexed is located if it shall be deemed to be in the best public interest, and by the highway district commissioners of the existing district by resolution, entered on their minutes prior to the election on the question of annexation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1624, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 89, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1624 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the first sentence, substituted “which vote shall be taken at an election” for “which vote may be taken either at a general or a special election” and added “on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1625. Election date where territory lies in more than one county.

Where territory to be annexed lies in more than one (1) county the election shall be held on the same day as it is mutually determined by agreement between the commissioners of both counties concerned on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1625, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 90, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1625 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, added “on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1626. Petition for election — Election.

The election shall be conducted in accordance with the general election laws of the state. A petition for the election shall be initiated by not less than twenty-five (25) property owners, or all property owners if there are less than twenty-five (25) in the proposed area to be annexed. The proposed area to be annexed shall be set forth with clarity as to be specifically identified by a map of the area. The petition upon being signed shall be submitted to the commissioners of the highway district and to the commissioners concerned. The petition shall, within thirty (30) days after presentment, be either approved or rejected by the recorded motion of the commissioners in their minutes. Upon the petition being approved by the commissioners of the county in which the territory or a part is situated and the commissioners of the highway district, a certified copy of the petition, together with a certified copy of the resolution of the highway commissioners approving the petition for annexation and with the proposed election precinct boundaries and polling place, shall within ten (10) days be transmitted by the highway commissioners to the county clerk of the county or counties, in which the territory to be annexed lies. The commissioners in the county in which the territory lies shall then within sixty (60) days fix a time for the election on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code. The commissioners and county clerk shall do all things necessary for the holding of an election in conformity with the general election laws of the state. Upon the election being had the result shall be canvassed, declared and the result certified by the commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1626, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 91, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1626 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

Amendments.
Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1627. Majority vote required approving annexation — Action of commissioners.

If, after canvassing the election, a majority of the qualified electors of the additional territory voting are in favor of the annexation, then the commissioners must order that the additional area shall be annexed to the highway district and an order shall be entered in their minutes, and the area shall then constitute and be a part of the highway district. Where the area to be annexed lies in a county other than the county in which the election was held, duplicate copies of the result of the election, copy of the canvass and order annexing the area to the highway district shall be immediately transmitted by the county clerk of the county in which the election was held to the county clerk of the county in which the highway district lies, and shall be immediately approved by the commissioners and recorded in their minutes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1627, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1627 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1628. Certification by commissioners of order approving annexation.

The commissioners shall file one (1) certified copy of the order for record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the highway district is situated, and shall transmit a certified copy of the order to the commissioners of the highway district of which the area is annexed.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1628, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1628 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1601.

§ 40-1629. Taxation of annexed area for outstanding obligations.

Upon annexation, the area next to the highway district shall be and become a part of it and shall be subject to taxation for the payment of all the outstanding obligations of the district existing at the time of annexation, and be subject to taxation as all other lands of the district for the operation of the highway system of the district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1629, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1629, which comprised S.L. 1911, ch. 55, § 33; am. 1912, ch. 7, § 1; C.L. 62:33; C.S., § 1525; I.C.A.,§ 39-1539, was repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 39, § 1.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1630. Payment of costs of election.

The costs of the election shall be paid by the county or counties conducting the election.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1630, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 92, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1630, which comprised 1911, ch. 55, § 34, p. 135; reen. C.L. 62:34; C.S., § 1526; I.C.A.,§ 39-1540, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, substituted “shall be paid by the county or counties conducting the election” for “shall be paid by the highway district annexing the territory.”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1631, 40-1632. Employers liable for employee’s poll tax — Deduction from salary or wages — Receipt — Exemptions from tax — Reimbursement of employer. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1631, 40-1632. 1911, ch. 55, §§ 35, 36, p. 135; reen. C.L. 62:35, 62:36; C.S., §§ 1527, 1528; am. 1927, ch. 16, p. 21; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1541, 39-1542.

§ 40-1633. Apportionment of county road and bridge taxes. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised 1911, ch. 55, § 37, p. 136; am. 1915, ch. 139, p. 296; reen. C.L. 62:37; C.S., § 1529; I.C.A.,§ 39-1543, was repealed by S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 29.

§ 40-1634 — 40-1638. Apportionment in particular cases — Assessor to furnish assessed valuation — Board to make levy — Creation of local improvement districts — Limitation on levys — Penalties — Election to increase levy — Notice. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1634, 40-1635. 1911, ch. 55, §§ 38, 39, p. 137; reen. C.L. 62:38, 62:39; C.S., §§ 1530, 1531; I.C.A.,§ 39-1544, 39-1545.

40-1637, 40-1638. 1923, ch. 150, §§ 1, 2, p. 218; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1547, 39-1548.

§ 40-1639. Apportionment of highway district taxes. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised 1911, ch. 55, § 41, p. 139; reen. C.L., 62:41; C.S., § 1534; I.C.A.,§ 39-1550; am. 1947, ch. 87, § 2, p. 147; am. 1961, ch. 34, § 1, p. 50, was repealed by S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 29.

§ 40-1640 — 40-1678. Highway district taxes — Bonds of municipalities — Duties of county assessor — Collection of taxes — Liability of county officials — Payment of money to districts — Treasurer of district — Duties — Warrants — Notice — Interest — Bonds and funding bonds — Security — Special tax districts — Cities, towns and villages included in highway districts — Jurisdiction of districts — Disorganization of districts — Validation of irregularities — Budget — Fiscal year — Fund balances accumulation. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985:

40-1654. 1911, ch. 55, § 58, p. 144; reen. C.L. 62:58; C.S., § 1551; am. 1927, ch. 262, § 16, p. 546; I.C.A.,§ 39-1566; am. 1933, ch. 131, § 3, p. 201; am. 1969, ch. 71, § 1, p. 221; 1980, ch. 350, § 19, p. 887.

40-1655. 1911, ch. 55, § 63, p. 121; compiled and reen. C.L. 62:63; C.S., § 1556; I.C.A.,§ 39-1568.

40-1665. 1911, ch. 55, § 64, p. 121; am. 1917, ch. 48, § 1, p. 108; reen. C.L. 62:64; C.S., § 1568; I.C.A.,§ 39-1580.

40-1666. 1911, ch. 55, § 65, p. 149; reen. C.L. 62:65; C.S., § 1569; I.C.A.,§ 39-1581.

40-1667. 1913, ch. 151, § 1, p. 520; compiled and reen. C.L. 62:66; C.S., § 1570; I.C.A.,§ 39-1582.

40-1668. 1913, ch. 151, § 2, p. 520; reen. C.L. 62:67; C.S., § 1571; I.C.A.,§ 39-1583.

40-1669. 1927, ch. 252, § 10, p. 418; I.C.A.,§ 39-1610.

40-1670. 1927, ch. 252, § 11, p. 418; I.C.A.,§ 39-1611.

40-1671. 1927, ch. 252, § 12, p. 418; I.C.A.,§ 39-1612.

Chapter 17 COUNTY HIGHWAY REORGANIZATION

Sec.

§ 40-1701. Legislative intent.

It is the intent of the legislature in amending this chapter to declare that it is necessary in the further promotion, regulation, control and administration of the secondary highways within the state of Idaho for the electorate to adopt a secondary highway system at the county level and for the elimination of impractical and uneconomical units and still maintain the element of home rule and administration of secondary highways within the various county and highway district systems exclusive of the state highway system.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1701, as added by 1998, ch. 415, § 1, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§§ 40-1701 to 40-1713, which comprised C.S., §§ 1503A to 1503M, as added by 1931, ch. 33, § 1, p. 69; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1701 to 39-1713; am. 1941, ch. 55, §§ 2, 3, p. 113, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 40-1701 was amended and redesignated as§ 40-1702 by § 2 of S.L. 1998, ch. 415.

CASE NOTES

Cited

Daugharty v. Post Falls Hwy. Dist., 134 Idaho 731, 9 P.3d 534 (2000).

§ 40-1702. Countywide election to adopt method of secondary highway administration — Procedure.

  1. In any county where there is a petition for an election to adopt a new method of administration of the secondary highways in the county, the procedure outlined in this chapter shall be followed.
  2. The petitions signed by five percent (5%) of the qualified voters or twenty-five (25) persons, whichever is greater, of each highway district and the area served by a county road department, where applicable, within the county may be filed with the county clerk and upon the commissioners finding that the petitions have been properly signed and filed, cause the formation of a local highway study commission as provided in section 40-1712, Idaho Code, prior to submitting the matter to vote of the entire county at the next general election, providing that the next general election is not less than one hundred eighty (180) days from the filing of the petitions. All of the laws of the state relating to holding of elections at the county level shall apply to the holding of the election and the notice of election shall notify the electors of the issues to be voted upon at the election, and publication of a notice shall be in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code. Public hearings within the county shall be held, as deemed advisable, by the highway study commission.
  3. The election shall be conducted in such a manner that the vote is canvassed separately in each of the existing highway districts and the area served by a county road department, where applicable.
  4. The county clerk in the notice of election shall indicate polling places as designated by the county commissioners for each precinct and/or district, as appropriate, to adequately provide for the vote at the election. Every qualified elector of the county may vote.
  5. The vote shall be canvassed by the county board of canvassers within the time specified in chapter 12, title 34, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1701, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. and redesig. 1998, ch. 415, § 2, p. 1307; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 93, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 40-1702 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the next-to-last sentence in subsection (2), deleted “except as may be specifically modified in this chapter” following the first occurrence of “election” and substituted “and” for “In addition to other requirements of law” and “title 34, Idaho Code” for “section 40-206, Idaho Code”; in subsection (4), substituted “county clerk” for “commissioners” and “shall indicate polling places as designated by the county commissioners for each precinct” for “shall designate polling places in each precinct”; and rewrote subsection (5), which formerly read: “The vote shall be canvassed by the commissioners within five (5) days of the election.” Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 40-1701.

Former§ 40-1702 was amended and redesignated as§ 40-1703 by § 3 of S.L. 1998, ch. 415.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1703. Subsequent elections.

Another election may be similarly called and held by the submission of petitions as provided by section 40-1702, Idaho Code, and any subsequent election shall not be held more often than six (6) years after the holding of any election submitting this question to the vote of the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1702, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. and redesig. 1998, ch. 415, § 3, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1703 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 40-1702.

Another former§ 40-1703 was amended and redesignated as§ 40-1704 by § 4 of S.L. 1998, ch. 415.

§ 40-1704. Districts to be economically workable.

Highway districts organized or consolidated from existing highway districts and areas served by a county road department, where applicable, under the provisions of this chapter shall consist of areas having sufficient mileage, equipment, resources, valuation and budget to be considered economically workable. The county commissioners shall organize the district(s) with regard to geographical locations for the most efficient operation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1703, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. and redesig. 1998, ch. 415, § 4, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 40-1704 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 40-1703.

Former§ 40-1704 was amended and redesignated as§ 40-1705 by § 5 of S.L. 1998, ch. 415.

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 40-1705. Organization of countywide highway districts — Highway district commissioners — Appointment — Terms — Election.

  1. Countywide highway districts may be organized under the laws applicable to highway districts and for county highway districts, new highway districts, consolidated or enlarged highway districts, and the number of highway commissioners to be elected shall be three (3). The formation of new districts shall be effected by the commissioners of the county so affected within sixty (60) days of the reorganization election, and upon the determination that a county highway system shall be reorganized as a countywide highway district, new highway districts, consolidation, enlargement or other modification, the original highway district commissioners shall, within seventy (70) days of the election, be appointed by the governor. A new highway district shall be divided by the commissioners into three (3) subdistricts as nearly equal in mileage, market value for assessment purposes, and population as practicable under the circumstances, for the purpose of determining each highway commissioner’s district, and each commissioner for a highway district shall represent and be elected or appointed from the district in which he resides.
  2. Upon appointment, qualification and acceptance of duties as highway commissioners, those originally appointed shall, by lot, determine two (2) of the original appointed highway commissioners who shall serve for terms of original appointment for two (2) years, or until the next regular election for highway commissioners. The remaining highway commissioner shall serve for a period of four (4) years, or until the next succeeding election for highway commissioners. Thereafter, the highway commissioners elected shall be elected for four (4) year terms as their terms expire, thus providing a continuation in office of highway district commissioners, and providing for the staggered election of the commissioners in subsequent elections.
  3. Laws applicable to the election of highway commissioners shall apply to the conduct of highway district elections throughout the county, and the election for highway commissioners shall be on a nonpartisan basis.
  4. Where a countywide highway district, new highway district, or consolidated or enlarged district results from an election under this chapter, it shall be the duty of the governor, in the appointment of the original highway commissioners for the county, where there shall have been in existence at the time of the creation of any highway districts within the limits of the county to appoint whenever practicable, the existing highway commissioners as they shall qualify by residence in the territorial limits of the districts of the newly created highway district as a highway commissioner of the newly created highway district system. County commissioners, city mayors and city council members shall not be eligible to hold office as a highway district commissioner.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1704, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. and redesig. 1998, ch. 415, § 5, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 40-1705 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 40-1704.

Former§ 40-1705 was amended and redesignated as§ 40-1706 by § 6 of S.L. 1998, ch. 415.

§ 40-1706. Adjustment of highway district borders — Notice — Hearing — Decision of commissioners — Appeal.

In areas where more than one (1) highway district exists and the highway districts were organized under the provisions of this chapter, the commissioners shall have the duty and obligation from time to time as shall be practical and for the best interests of the countywide administration of the secondary highway systems, to adjust the borders of the highway districts coexisting in the county as shall most equitably and economically permit the administration, operation and construction of the secondary highway system within the county. Notice of a proposal to change the boundaries of the highway districts within the county shall be given by the commissioners through the county clerk to the districts affected and notice shall be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code. At the hearing any person objecting may be heard in opposition, and upon the closing of the hearing, the commissioners shall within ten (10) days after the hearing, notify the districts affected of their decision, and any district aggrieved by the decision shall have the right through its highway commissioners to appeal the decision directly to the district court of the county in which the district lies. Matters referred to the district court on appeal shall be submitted by petition for hearing within twenty (20) days of the announcement of the decision of the commissioners and the matter disposed of by the district court by reversal or approval. Failure to diligently prosecute the matter before the district court shall justify the district court in dismissing the appeal without hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1705, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. and redesig. 1998, ch. 415, § 6, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1706, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1706, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 415, § 7, effective July 1, 1998.

Another former§ 40-1706 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 40-1705.

§ 40-1707, 40-1708. Dissolution of district in existence at time of option election — Payment of expenses of local option elections. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1707 and 40-1708 were repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised I.C.,§§ 40-1707 and 40-1708, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, were repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 415, § 7, effective July 1, 1998.

§ 40-1709. Inventory and financial statement of dissolved district — Disposition of property and obligations of dissolved district and county road departments.

  1. Upon an election being held under the provisions of this chapter and an option being chosen, all affected highway districts and the county road department, where applicable, shall prepare and file with the county commissioners an inventory of all machinery, buildings, lands and property of every kind and nature and financial statement not later than ten (10) days subsequent to the canvass of the election.
  2. Title to all machinery, buildings, lands and property of every kind and nature, belonging to each affected highway jurisdiction shall immediately upon the dissolution of the district and county road department without further conveyance, be vested in the county commissioners as custodians and be delivered to the succeeding operational unit as soon as practicable. The succeeding unit shall be liable for any and all unliquidated obligations of the dissolved highway districts and county road department.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1709, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 415, § 8, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1709 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Application.

A former similar section regarding the disposition of property of a dissolved district was not intended to embrace county owned property previously used by county road departments, and, accordingly, a highway district did not by operation of law receive title to land and a building owned by the county and previously used by the county road department. Worley Hwy. Dist. v. Kootenai County, 98 Idaho 925, 576 P.2d 206 (1978).

§ 40-1710. Apportionment of area of dissolved district in county where several highway districts exist. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1710 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1710, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 415, § 7, effective July 1, 1998.

§ 40-1711. Decennial county elections for new type of highway administration

Exceptions. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1711 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-1711, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1986, ch. 98, § 1.

§ 40-1712. Highway study commission — Establishment — Membership.

In each county required to conduct an election under the provisions of section 40-1702, Idaho Code, there shall be established a local highway study commission. The local highway study commission in each county shall be composed as follows:

  1. One (1) member shall be appointed by the highway district commissioners of each highway district within the county;
  2. The mayor of the city with the largest population within the county shall appoint one (1) member;
  3. The chairman of the county commissioners shall appoint a county commissioner as one (1) member and that member will serve as chairman of the commission.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1712, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 415, § 9, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1712 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

§ 40-1713. Meeting of highway study commission — Selection of option for submission — Election — Implementation of option — Retention of existing system.

  1. The highway study commission shall meet at the county courthouse, at the call of the chairman, no later than one hundred fifty (150) days prior to the election called for by this chapter. At that meeting, or at any other meetings as may be necessary to make the decision, the commission shall analyze the options for administration for the county’s secondary highways.
  2. The options for the administration of the county’s secondary highways are as follows:
    1. To establish a countywide highway system for the administration of the secondary highway system of the entire county, exclusive of those highways and streets within cities, with functioning street departments, by county commissioners;
    2. To establish a single countywide highway district for the administration of the secondary highway system of the entire county, exclusive of those highways and streets within cities with functioning street departments, independent of the administration of the county commissioners; and
    3. For the division of the county into not more than four (4) highway districts for the administration of the secondary highways of the county, exclusive of those highways and streets within cities, with functioning street departments, independent of the county commissioners.
  3. The highway study commission will, at least ninety (90) days prior to the election, select one (1) of those options for submission to the electorate at the election. The question to be submitted to the electorate shall be substantially as follows:
  4. If a majority of the voters casting votes in each of the highway districts and the area served by the county road department, where applicable, approve the proposal submitted, the commissioners shall implement the option selected as provided by this chapter.
  5. If the proposal is defeated by the voters casting votes in each of the highway districts and the area served by the county road department, where applicable, the county shall retain its current system for the administration of its secondary highways.

For the purpose of administering the secondary highway system of . . . . County, shall the county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .? Yes . . . .   =qr No . . . .

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1713, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 415, § 10, p. 1307.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1713 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1701.

§ 40-1714. Expenses of election.

In all counties where elections are held under the provisions of this chapter, commissioners shall pay expenses of the elections from the election fund of the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1714, as added by 1998, ch. 415, § 11, p. 1307; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 94, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1714, which comprised C.S., § 1503-N, as added by 1931, ch. 33, § 1, p. 69; I.C.A.,§ 39-1714, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, in the section catchline, deleted “Proration to systems — Appeals” from the end; and, in text, substituted “election fund” for “general fund” and deleted the last two sentences, which dealt with proration of expenses and appeals procedure.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

Chapter 18 DISSOLUTION OF HIGHWAY DISTRICTS

Sec.

§ 40-1801. Districts subject to dissolution.

Any highway district of the state, except a single countywide highway district formed pursuant to chapter 14, title 40, Idaho Code, may be dissolved as provided in this chapter. Sections 40-1806 through 40-1821, Idaho Code, shall apply to any election and process for dissolution of a single countywide highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1801, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2004, ch. 361, § 2, p. 1081.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1801 to 40-1821, which comprised 1931, ch. 224,§§ 1-21, p. 449; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1801 to 39-1821, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

§ 40-1802. Petition for dissolution — Contents.

All proceedings for the dissolution of highway districts shall be initiated by a petition of twenty-five (25) or more qualified electors of the district, addressed to the commissioners of the county in which the district is situate, and which shall concisely state the grounds or reasons for the dissolution and contain a request for a hearing of the petition.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1802, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1802 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1803. Order for hearing upon petition.

The petition shall be filed with the clerk of the commissioners and at its next regular meeting, or at any special meeting called for that purpose, and the commissioners shall by an order fix a time and place for the hearing of the petition, which time shall not be less than twenty-one (21) days from and after the date of the first publication of the notice of the petition and hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1803, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1803 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1804. Notice of petition and hearing.

The commissioners shall require their clerk to cause a notice to be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, setting forth that a petition has been filed, the prayer of the petition and notice of the time and place when and where the petition will be heard, and further notice that any elector of the district may, prior to or at the time of the hearing, file with the clerk written objections to the proposed dissolution.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1804, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1804 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1805. Hearing — Order for election.

At the time and place specified in the notice, the commissioners shall proceed to consider the petition and all written objections to it, and shall hear all persons in relation to it, and shall hear or take testimony as may be offered or as they desire. Upon the conclusion of the hearing which may be continued from day to day, if the commissioners determine that the district ought to be dissolved and that the dissolution would be to the best interest of the district, it shall enter an order directing that the question of dissolution of the district be submitted to the qualified electors of the district at an election to be held on the date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code, which is not less than thirty (30) days from and after the order.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1805, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 95, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1805 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, inserted “on a date authorized in section 34-106, Idaho Code, which is” and deleted “nor more than sixty (60)” following “thirty (30).”

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

CASE NOTES

Best Interest of District.
Standing.

County commissioners did not err in holding a highway district should dissolve because the “best interest of district” was considered something more than just the corporate entity and meant taking into account consideration of geographical area and the interests of persons the district was intended to serve; however, the city could not be the highway district’s successor. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 887, 71 P.3d 1034 (2003). Standing.

Highway district clearly had standing to appeal a board of county commissioner’s decision to dissolve it, the possible effect upon the highway district was apparent in that it could have been destroyed. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 887, 71 P.3d 1034 (2003).

§ 40-1806. Election officers — Notice of election.

The county clerk shall appoint judges for the election, to be chosen from the electors of the district and the county commissioners shall by order establish polling places. The county clerk shall publish notice of the election in accordance with the provisions of section 34-1406, Idaho Code. The notice shall state the purpose of the election and the polling places.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1806, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 96, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1806 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1807. Qualifications of voters.

Any person residing in the district possessing the qualifications required by law for a voter at any general election of the state shall be entitled to vote in the election.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1807, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1807 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1808. Conduct of elections.

  1. The polls in all elections shall be presided over by the judges and clerks appointed by the county clerk.
  2. All elections shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1808, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 97, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1808 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1809. Counting votes — Canvass — Order of dissolution.

Immediately following the close of the polls at the time specified in the notices of election the votes shall be counted in accordance with the provisions of title 34, Idaho Code. The board of county commissioners shall canvass the returns as provided in chapter 12, title 34, Idaho Code, and in the event a majority of the votes cast in the district are in favor of dissolution, the county commissioners shall immediately make and enter an order declaring the district dissolved.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1809, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 98, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1809 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-1810. Expenses of dissolution — How borne and paid.

All expenses of proceedings to dissolve highway districts, including the posting and publication of notices of hearings on the petitions and of the election, the printing of ballots and compensation of judges and clerks of election, shall be borne by the county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1810, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2009, ch. 341, § 99, p. 993.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1810 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 341, substituted “highway district” for “county” and deleted the last sentence, which dealt with expenses incurred with the defeating of a proposal to dissolve.

Effective Dates.

Section 161 of S.L. 2009, ch. 341 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 2011.

§ 40-1811. Disposition of surplus funds and property of dissolved system or district.

  1. After final payment of all expenses of proceedings in relation to dissolution and of all legal claims, liabilities, bonded and other indebtedness of the dissolved highway district, and after liquidation and winding up of the affairs of the district, all surplus moneys of the dissolved highway district remaining in the special fund of the dissolved district shall immediately be delivered to the treasurer of the succeeding operational unit. Title to all machinery, buildings, lands, and property of every kind and nature belonging to the dissolved system or district shall immediately upon entry of the order of dissolution, and without further conveyance, be vested in the succeeding operational unit.
  2. No city whose incorporated limits lie wholly or partially within the boundaries of a dissolved highway district shall be entitled to receive any share of the moneys of the dissolved highway district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1811, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1811 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

CASE NOTES

Successor Entity.

This section does not prescribe where the money would go if not to the successor but a plain reading of the statute indicates that a city cannot be the successor to a highway district. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist. v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 138 Idaho 887, 71 P.3d 1034 (2003).

§ 40-1812. Provision for payment of current claims.

As a part of the proceedings of and order for dissolution of a district, the commissioners shall make a determination, so nearly as may be done, of the total indebtedness of the dissolved district, including bonded, funded bond, and all warrant indebtedness, both as to registered and floating warrants, and current indebtedness of, or claims against, the district. They shall likewise determine the amount of funds on hand belonging to the dissolved district, and shall estimate the revenue to be derived from sale of district property, from uncollected taxes or assessments levied or assessed in the district, and the amount of highway users’ funds as the highway district would be entitled to receive from the county in which the district is situated had the district not been dissolved. From that determination, the commissioners shall compute the probable amount of money which may be applied in payment of current indebtedness of the dissolved district and shall order and provide for the manner in which current claims against the district shall be presented to the commissioners for allowance and payment by warrants drawn against the special fund of the district in the county treasury.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1812, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1812 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1813. Dissolution of district situated in two or more counties.

When any highway district is to be dissolved, situate in two (2) or more counties, the commissioners of the county whose county seat is situated most nearly to the geographical center of the district, shall have jurisdiction of the dissolution of the district and the same procedure, including notices and elections, shall be followed as provided in this chapter and chapter 17 of this title, for dissolution of highway districts situated in one (1) county. Meetings shall be had at the county seat of the county having jurisdiction of the dissolution of the highway district before a joint session of the commissioners from all the counties affected by the dissolution. The commissioners of the counties affected shall cause to be made and entered an order for notice, election, and for the dissolution and winding up of the affairs of the highway district and specifying when the same shall be dissolved, and the succeeding operational unit, if any.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1813, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1813 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1814. Districts in two or more counties — Provision for payment of indebtedness upon dissolution.

The commissioners of the county in which the petitions for dissolution are filed, shall determine the indebtedness of the entire district and shall provide for the payment of the indebtedness out of district funds on hand, or to be raised by special levies, levied by the county, and shall be certified to the clerk of the commissioners of each of the counties in which is situated any part of the dissolved district, and an ad valorem tax shall be levied and imposed by each of the counties upon property of the district as may be within the county. The tax shall be collected, and not less than quarterly, be remitted to the treasurer of the county where the petitions are filed, to be applied in payment of the indebtedness of the dissolved district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1814, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1814 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1815. Jurisdiction of property of dissolved district situated in two or more counties.

The succeeding operational unit of the county in which the proceedings for the dissolution of highway districts, situated in two (2) or more counties are had, or the commissioners of the county or counties wherein the district was situate shall, after the order of dissolution, have exclusive jurisdiction over all of the property, business and affairs of the dissolved district, whether situate in the county or not, including the power to issue funding bonds against the whole territory of the district for the payment of funding of bonds, warrants, and for other indebtedness of the district when funds for payment cannot be secured by current taxation.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1815, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1815 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1816. Control of bridges and highways of dissolved district.

From and after the entry of the order for dissolution of any highway district, the commissioners of the county where the district was situate, or the succeeding operational unit, shall have the same control over all bridges and highways of the district situate in the county, as was or is vested in the commissioners in other territory of the county, including the power to levy ad valorem taxes upon the property situate therein for general highway and bridge purposes.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1816, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1816 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1817. Limitation on new proceedings for dissolution.

When any proceedings for dissolution of any highway district shall have failed of adoption, either on account of order of the commissioners or at election, no new proceedings for dissolution of the district shall be initiated less than one (1) year thereafter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1817, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1817 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1818. Validity of outstanding obligations.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as impairing the validity of any outstanding bonds or warrants of a dissolved system or district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1818, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1818 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

CASE NOTES

Cited

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Indep. Highway Dist., 139 Idaho 65, 72 P.3d 905 (2003).

§ 40-1819. Acts and proceedings established or commenced before chapter takes effect not affected.

This chapter shall not affect any act done, ratified or confirmed, or any right accrued or established, or any action or proceeding had or commenced in a civil or criminal cause before July 1, 1985, but those actions or proceedings may be prosecuted and continued by the county, district or city.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1819, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1819 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1820. Continuance in service of employees of dissolved system or district.

All persons in the employ of any dissolved city highway system or highway district may be continued in service so far as their services may be required by the succeeding operational unit.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1820, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1820 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1821. No district dissolved until succeeding operational unit in existence.

No highway districts dissolved under the terms and provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to have been dissolved and shall not cease to operate and perform their duties and obligations until there shall have been organized and existing a succeeding operational unit.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1821, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1821 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1801.

§ 40-1822. Indebtedness prior to consolidation

Liability of property in former districts. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised 1931, ch. 224, § 22, p. 449; I.C.A.,§ 39-1822, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Chapter 19 BEAUTIFICATION OF HIGHWAYS

Sec.

§ 40-1901. Legislative intent and policy — Tourist related advertising devices.

  1. The state of Idaho herewith finds and determines that the removal of tourist related signs which were lawfully created under state law in force at the time of their erection which do not conform to the requirements of section 131(o), title 23, United States Code, which provide directional information about goods and services in the interest of the traveling public, and which were in existence on May 6, 1976, may work a substantial economic hardship in defined areas within the state.
  2. The legislature further finds and declares that outdoor advertising is a form of commercial use of the public highway and regulation and removal of outdoor advertising is a highway purpose. In order to provide for maximum visibility along highways and to permit unobstructed view of connecting highways and intersections, to prevent the distraction of operators of motor vehicles, to prevent confusion with respect to traffic lights, signs or signals, or otherwise interfere with the effectiveness of traffic regulations, to preserve and enhance the natural scenic beauty of areas traversed by interstate and primary highways, to protect the public investment in highways, to promote the recreational value of public travel, to conform to the expressed intent of congress to control the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising displays, and to promote the maximum safety, comfort and well-being, of the users of highways, the legislature finds and declares it to be necessary in the public interest to regulate the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising structures, signs and displays and the business or occupation, in areas adjacent to interstate and primary highways, in accordance with the terms of this chapter and regulations promulgated by the board.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1901, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-1901 to 40-1907, which comprised 1927, ch. 5, §§ 1 to 7, p. 9; I.C.A.,§§ 39-1901 to 39-1907; am. 1980, ch. 350, § 20, p. 887, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-1902. Erecting and maintaining advertising displays.

The provisions of this chapter and the regulation of erecting and maintaining advertising displays, insofar as the regulation may affect erecting and maintaining advertising displays visible from the interstate or primary system of highways of this state, shall be exclusive of all regulations whether enacted by a law of this state or by a political subdivision [of] the state.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1902, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1902 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion was added by the compiler to supply obviously missing text.

§ 40-1903. County zoning ordinances.

It is the intention of the legislature to occupy the whole field of regulation by this chapter, except that nothing in this chapter prohibits enforcement of any or all of its provisions by persons designated to act by appropriate ordinances duly adopted by any county of this state, nor does this chapter prohibit the passage by any county of reasonable land use or zoning regulations affecting the placing of advertising displays or the placement and operation of junkyards, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 65, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1903, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1998, ch. 259, § 1, p. 861.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1903 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1998, ch. 259 declared an emergency. Approved March 23, 1998.

§ 40-1904. Private and public notices.

Nothing contained in this chapter applies to any advertising display used exclusively for:

  1. Directional and other official signs and notices erected or maintained by public officers or agencies pursuant to and in accordance with direction or authorization contained in state or federal law, for the purpose of carrying out an official duty or responsibility;
  2. Structures, signs and displays advertising the sale or lease of property upon which they are located; and
  3. Structures, signs and displays advertising activities conducted on the property on which they are located.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1904, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1904 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

§ 40-1905. Licenses required — Application.

  1. No person shall engage in or carry on the business or occupation of outdoor advertising without first having paid the license fee provided by this chapter.
  2. An application for a license shall be made by each outdoor advertising business on a form furnished by the department.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1905, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1905 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

§ 40-1906. Permits for placing advertising display — Application.

  1. No person shall place any advertising display within the area affected by the provisions of this chapter in this state without first having secured a written permit from the department.
  2. A separate application for a permit shall be made for each separate outdoor advertising structure, sign or display on a form furnished by the department, which application shall contain information as the department may require. Each application shall be accompanied by the written consent of the owner or tenant of the real property upon which the structure, sign or display is to be erected or maintained, unless the consent shall have previously been filed with the department. An application shall be made for a permit to maintain an existing outdoor advertising structure, sign or display or to renew a permit.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1906, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1906 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

§ 40-1907. Permits and licenses — Issuance — Fees.

  1. The department, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, shall issue or renew permits and licenses for a period of at least one (1) year for the erection or maintenance of all type of outdoor advertising structures, signs or displays. No permit or license shall be issued for the erection or construction of any sign which would be in violation of local law or ordinance at the time application is filed, and further provided that no permit shall be withheld or denied for a nonconforming sign which is to be removed pursuant to the terms of this chapter by reason of the sign being located upon land to which the state or the department has acquired a restrictive covenant regarding the erection of signs if the sign was in existence prior to October 22, 1965.
  2. The license fee for an original license, and for each annual renewal, is payable annually in advance, as follows:
    1. Fifty dollars ($50.00) for persons owning one or more but fewer than one hundred (100) signs subject to this chapter.
    2. One hundred dollars ($100) for persons owning more than one hundred (100) signs subject to this chapter.
  3. Licenses granted shall expire each year on December 31 and shall not be pro rated. Application for renewal of licenses shall be made not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration.
  4. A permit fee of ten dollars ($10.00) shall accompany each original permit application. An annual permit fee of three dollars ($3.00) shall accompany each renewal permit application.
  5. The issuance of a permit and payment of a permit fee for the placing of an advertising structure includes the right to change the advertising copy thereon without obtaining any additional permit for the remainder of the calendar year in which the permit is issued and without the payment of any additional permit fee.
  6. Any license or permit issued pursuant to this chapter may be transferred to any person who acquires the business as a successor of the person for whom the license or permit was issued.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1907, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-1907 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-1901.

§ 40-1908. Bond of out-of-state licensee or permittee.

When an application for a license or permit or for renewal is made by a nonresident or by a foreign corporation engaged in the business of outdoor advertising, the department in its discretion, as a condition to the issuance of a license or permit or renewal, may require the corporation to deposit with the department a bond in an amount and with surety to be approved by the department, to secure the corporation’s compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1908, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1909. Identification of advertising structures — Placing structure without permit plate — Violation.

  1. The department shall require that each outdoor advertising structure, sign or display shall bear an identification tag or plate to be issued by the department, and if erected or maintained by an outdoor advertising business that it shall also bear his name.
  2. No person shall place any advertising structure, sign or display unless there is securely fastened upon the front a permit plate of the character specified in subsection (1) above. Placing an advertising display without having affixed a permit plate is prima facie evidence that the advertising display has been placed and is being maintained in violation of this chapter, and any such display shall be subject to removal.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1909, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1910. Location of displays.

No advertising display shall be placed or maintained in any of the following locations or positions or under any of the following conditions or if the advertising structure or sign is of the following nature:

  1. Within the right-of-way of any highway;
  2. Visible from any interstate or primary highway and simulating or imitating any directional, warning, danger or information sign permitted under the provisions of this chapter, or if intended or likely to be construed as giving warnings of traffic;
  3. Within any stream or drainage canal or below the flood water level of any stream or drainage canal where the advertising display might be deluged by flood waters and swept under any highway structure crossing the stream or drainage canal or against the supports of the highway structure;
  4. Not maintained in a safe condition;
  5. Visible from any interstate or primary highway and displaying any red, blue or blinking intermittent light likely to be mistaken for a warning or danger signal;
  6. Illuminated with such brilliance and so positioned as to blind or dazzle the vision of travelers on adjacent interstate or primary highways;
  7. Purported to direct the movement of traffic;
  8. Painted, affixed or attached to any natural feature as more particularly prohibited by section 18-7017, Idaho Code;
  9. Hinder the clear, unobstructed view of approaching or merging traffic, nor obscure from view any traffic sign or other official sign;
  10. Located as to obscure the view of any connecting highway or intersection; and
  11. Not clear or in good repair.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1910, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1910A. Removal of off-premises outdoor advertising prohibited without compensation.

  1. No governmental entity, including the state, or any municipality, county or other political subdivision shall remove or cause to be removed any legally placed off-premises outdoor advertising without paying compensation in cash or other method of payment mutually agreed upon, to the owner of the off-premises outdoor advertising based upon the fair market value of the off-premises outdoor advertising removed or proposed to be removed.
  2. As used in this section:
    1. “Off-premises outdoor advertising” means any outdoor sign, display, light, device, figure, painting, drawing, message, plaque, poster, billboard or other thing which is designed, intended or used to advertise or inform and which is situated in order to be visible from any highway, or other traveled way and which is located on property which is separate from and not adjoining the premises or property on which the advertised activity is carried out.
    2. “Fair market value of the off-premises outdoor advertising” means the value of the off-premises outdoor advertising which shall include consideration of the income derived from the same and which shall otherwise be determined in the same manner as provided in section 7-711, Idaho Code.
    3. “Legally placed” means, in reference to off-premises outdoor advertising, off-premises outdoor advertising which was erected in compliance with state laws and local ordinances, in effect at the time of erection or which was subsequently brought into compliance with state laws and local ordinances, except that the term does not apply to any off-premises outdoor advertising whose use is modified after erection in a manner which causes it to become illegal. Nothing herein shall require the payment of compensation for the removal by a governmental entity of any off-premises or other outdoor advertising which is, without authorization, erected or located in or upon a public right-of-way unless the same was legally placed thereon prior to the premises becoming a public right-of-way.
    4. “Relocation” means removal of off-premises outdoor advertising and construction within the same market area of new off-premises outdoor advertising to substitute for the off-premises outdoor advertising removed.
  3. It is a policy of this state to encourage governmental entities and owners of off-premises outdoor advertising to enter into relocation agreements in lieu and instead of paying the compensation provided herein, to continue development in a planned manner without expenditures of public funds while allowing continued maintenance of private investment and a medium of public communication. The state, cities, counties and all other political subdivisions are specifically empowered to enter into relocation agreements on whatever terms are agreeable to the off-premises outdoor advertising owner and the governmental entity and to adopt rules, ordinances or resolutions providing for relocation of off-premises outdoor advertising, provided that nothing herein shall require compensation other than the actual cost of relocation unless the said owner is reasonably unable to acquire an alternate permissible location of comparable cost and value within the same market area. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this section shall not be construed to prohibit a governmental entity from entering into any relocation agreement upon such terms as shall be otherwise lawful. (4) The requirement by a local governmental entity that legally placed off-premises advertising be removed as a condition or prerequisite for the issuance or continued effectiveness of a permit, license or other approval for any use, structure, development or activity other than off-premises outdoor advertising constitutes a compelled removal requiring compensation under this section unless the permit, license or approval is requested for the construction of a building or structure which cannot be built without physically removing the off-premises outdoor advertising.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1910A, as added by 1997, ch. 156, § 1, p. 451.

§ 40-1911. General prohibitions.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no advertising display shall be erected or maintained within six hundred sixty (660) feet from the edge of the right-of-way of the interstate and primary system of highways within this state except the following:

  1. Directional or other official signs or notices that are required or authorized by law, informational or directional signs regarding telephone service, emergency telephone signs, buried or underground cable markers and above cable closures;
  2. Signs advertising the sale or lease of property upon which they are located;
  3. Displays advertising activities conducted on the property upon which they are located, provided that not more than one (1) such sign, visible to traffic proceeding in any one direction, and advertising activities being conducted upon the real property where the sign is located may be permitted more than fifty (50) feet from the advertising activity;
  4. Displays located within areas zoned industrial, business or commercial under authority of state law, or in unzoned industrial or commercial areas as determined by the department;
  5. Displays erected or maintained by the department on the right-of-way pursuant to regulation of the department designed to give information in the specific interest of the traveling public. The department, by and through its director, may, upon receipt of a certified copy of an ordinance from a board of county commissioners, or a city council, accompanied by all economic studies required by federal rules and regulations showing that the removal of tourist-related advertising activities would cause an economic hardship on a defined area, forward the ordinance to the secretary of the United States department of transportation for inclusion as a defined hardship area, qualifying for exemption pursuant to section 131(o), title 23, United States Code. The ordinance and economic studies shall show that (1) the tourist-related advertising devices provide directional information about goods and services in the interest of the traveling public, and (2) that the removal of the specific directional advertising displays will work a substantial economic hardship in the defined area;
  6. Signs lawfully in existence on October 22, 1965, determined to be landmark signs, including signs on farm structures or natural surfaces, of historic or artistic significance, the preservation of which would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter; and
  7. On or after July 1, 1985, no advertising structure or display shall be erected or maintained in this state, other than those allowed pursuant to subparagraphs (2), (3) and (4) of this section, which are located beyond six hundred sixty (660) feet of the right-of-way, located outside of urban areas, visible from the main traveled way of the system, and erected for the purpose of the message being read from that main traveled way of the system.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1911, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Selective Enforcement.

Where the department of transportation did not selectively enforce this section and§ 40-1912, it did not violate plaintiff’s constitutional right to equal protection under the law, and selective enforcement, without more, is not a violation of either the Idaho or the U.S. Constitutions. Young Elec. Sign Co. v. State ex rel. Winder, 135 Idaho 804, 25 P.3d 117 (2001).

§ 40-1912. Industrial or commercial zones.

  1. The provisions of section 40-1911, Idaho Code, shall not apply to those segments of the interstate and primary system of highways which traverse and abut on commercial, business or industrial zones within the boundaries of incorporated cities, wherein the use of real property adjacent to and abutting on the interstate and primary system of highways is subject to city or county regulation or control, or which traverse and abut on other areas where the land use is clearly established by state law or county zoning regulation, as industrial, business or commercial, or which are located within areas adjacent to the interstate and primary system of highways which are in unzoned commercial or industrial areas as determined by the department from actual land uses. The department shall determine the size, lighting and spacing of signs in the zoned and unzoned industrial, business or commercial areas.
  2. For the purpose of this chapter, areas abutting interstate and primary highways of this state which are zoned commercial or industrial by counties and cities shall be valid as commercial or industrial zones only as to the portions actually used for commerce or industrial purposes and the land along the highway in urban areas for a distance of six hundred (600) feet immediately abutting to the area of the use, and does not include areas so zoned in anticipation of such uses at some uncertain future date, nor does it include areas zoned for the primary purpose of allowing advertising structures. All signs located within an unzoned area shall become nonconforming if the commercial or industrial activity used in defining the area ceases for a continuous period of six (6) months.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1912, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1913. Removal of displays.

Any outdoor advertising which is not in compliance with the provisions of this chapter may be removed by the department. Just compensation shall be paid upon the removal of any outdoor advertising sign, display, or device lawfully erected under state law, but the department shall not be required to purchase or remove any advertising displays as required under this chapter, until matching federal aid funds are available for the purchase or removal by the federal government.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1913, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Damages.

Plaintiff was not entitled to damages because it had entered into a stipulation of settlement which provided that plaintiff was not entitled to compensation if the terms of the agreement were breached. Young Elec. Sign Co. v. State ex rel. Winder, 135 Idaho 804, 25 P.3d 117 (2001).

§ 40-1914. Local ordinances.

The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed as permitting a person to place or maintain in existence on or adjacent to any interstate or primary highway, any outdoor advertising prohibited by law or by an ordinance of a city or county.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1914, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1915. Nuisances.

All advertising displays which are placed or which exist in violation of the provisions of this chapter are public nuisances and may be removed by any public employee as is further provided in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1915, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1916. Penalty — Remedies cumulative.

  1. Any person who erects an advertising display, or who, as principal, agent or employee, causes or orders an advertising display to be erected, or one who permits an advertising display to be erected or maintained on land owned or leased by that person, in violation of the provisions of this chapter, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
  2. The remedies provided in this chapter for the removal of illegal advertising displays are cumulative and not exclusive of any other remedy provided by law.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1916, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

§ 40-1917, 40-1918. [Reserved.]

For the purpose of promoting the public safety, health, welfare, convenience and enjoyment of public travel, to protect the public investment in public highways, and to preserve and enhance the scenic beauty of lands bordering public highways, it is declared by the legislature of the state of Idaho to be in the public interest and for a highway purpose to regulate and restrict the establishment, operation and maintenance of junkyards in areas adjacent to highways on interstate and primary systems within the state. The legislature finds and declares that junkyards that are not in compliance with the provisions of this chapter are public nuisances.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1919, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1920. License — Renewal — Fee.

No person shall operate, establish, or maintain a junkyard, any portion of which is within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any highway on the interstate or primary system without obtaining a license from the board. The license and each renewal shall be issued on a calendar year basis and shall expire on December 31 following the date of issuance. A fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) shall be charged for each original license or renewal license which shall be deposited in the state treasury in the highway distribution account.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1920, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

§ 40-1921. Requirements for license.

Licenses shall be granted for the operation of those junkyards within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any highway on the interstate or primary system meeting the following requirements:

  1. Are screened by natural objects, plantings, fences or other appropriate means so as to render them invisible from the traveled way of the highway involved; or
  2. Located within areas which are zoned for industrial use under authority of state law or in unzoned industrial areas as determined by the board; or
  3. Are not visible from the main traveled way of the highway involved; or
  4. Are to be screened by the board as provided in section 40-313(4), Idaho Code; or
  5. Are to be relocated, removed or disposed of by the board as provided in section 40-313(4), Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1921, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1922. Dump permits — Renewal — Fee — Screening by owner.

No person shall operate, establish, or maintain a dump, any portion of which is within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any highway on the interstate or primary system without obtaining a permit from the board. The permit and each renewal shall be issued on a calendar year basis and shall expire on the 31st day of December following the date of issuance. A fee of fifteen dollars ($15.00) shall be charged for each original permit or renewal permit which shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the highway distribution account.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1922, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Highway distribution account,§ 40-701.

§ 40-1923, 40-1924. [Reserved.]

  1. The department or board may revoke any license or permit for the failure to comply with the provisions of this chapter and may remove and destroy any advertising display placed or maintained in violation of this chapter after written order posted on the structure or sign and copies served by certified mail upon both the owner of the display and the owner of the land upon which it is situate. The order shall be signed by the district engineer of the department in the applicable district. The parties shall have thirty (30) days within which to appeal the order to the board under the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the department or any of its authorized employees may summarily and without notice remove and destroy any advertising display placed in violation of this chapter which is temporary in nature because of the materials of which it is constructed or because of the nature of the copy on it.
  3. Proceedings for review of any action taken by the department pursuant to this section shall be instituted under the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-1925, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Jurisdiction.

The transportation department had subject matter jurisdiction through the exercise of the power granted to it pursuant to this section, and because the Idaho transportation board has been given broad authority by the Idaho legislature to regulate and enforce the erection and maintenance of advertising signs. Young Elec. Sign Co. v. State ex rel. Winder, 135 Idaho 804, 25 P.3d 117 (2001).

§ 40-1926. Violations as public nuisances — Injunctions — Venue.

All violations of this chapter are hereby declared to be public nuisances. The board may apply to the district court of the county in which the unlawful junkyard or dump is located for an injunction prohibiting further operation of any junkyard or dump in violation of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-1926, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-1919. Junkyards as public nuisances.

§ 40-1925. Enforcement — Revocation of license or permit — Notice — Hearing.

Chapter 20 HIGHWAY RELOCATION ASSISTANCE

Sec.

§ 40-2001. Relocation aid for persons displaced by public programs — Legislative finding.

The legislature finds and declares that the prompt and equitable relocation and reestablishment of persons, families, businesses, farmers, and nonprofit organizations displaced as a result of any state or local governmental program or project is a necessary purpose, is a cost of those programs and projects and is a public purpose. In order to insure that individuals do not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of programs designed for the benefit of the public as a whole the legislature declares that relocation payments and relocation advisory assistance shall be provided to all persons so displaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of this chapter and rules promulgated by the board. The legislature finds and declares that rent supplement or purchase assistance payments to tenants and relocation payments to owner-occupants, businesses, and farmers in accordance with the provisions of this chapter are a public purpose and are necessary to enable all displaced persons to obtain decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings. The legislature further declares the provisions of this chapter may be applicable to all programs.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2001, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 192, § 1, p. 472.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-2001 to 40-2020, which comprised 1931, ch. 95, §§ 1 to 9, p. 162; I.C.A.,§§ 39-2001 to 39-2020; am. 1939, ch. 23, § 1, p. 54; 1957, ch. 24, § 1, p. 30, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

§ 40-2002. Relocation advisory assistance.

Any agency is authorized, as a part of the cost of any program or project, to give relocation advisory assistance to any individual, family, business or farm operation displaced because of the acquisition of real property for any project. If any agency determines that any person occupying property immediately adjacent to the real property acquired has been caused substantial economic injury because of the acquisition, it shall offer him relocation advisory services.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2002, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 192, § 2, p. 472.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2002 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

§ 40-2003. Local relocation advisory assistance offices.

Any agency may, as a part of the cost of any public program or project, establish a local relocation advisory assistance office or agency to assist in obtaining relocation facilities for individuals, families and businesses which must relocate because of the acquisition of right-of-way for any project.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2003, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2003 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2004. Relocation expense — Compensation options — Limit of compensation for business or farm relocations.

  1. As a part of the cost of any public program or project, any agency using any funds for public purposes shall compensate a displaced person for his actual and reasonable expense in moving himself, family, business or farm operation, including moving personal property, and for any actual direct losses of tangible personal property as the result of moving or discontinuing a business or farm operation, but not to exceed an amount equal to the reasonable expenses that would have been required to relocate the property, as determined by the agency, and for actual reasonable expenses in searching for a replacement business or farm. However, the compensation authorized by this section for actual and reasonable moving expenses, actual direct losses of tangible personal property, and expenses in searching for a replacement farm or business shall be limited to relocating a displaced person, family, business or farm operation within a reasonable distance from the location previously occupied and from which the displaced person has been required to move.
  2. Any displaced person who moves from a dwelling who elects to accept the payments authorized by this subsection in lieu of the payments authorized by subsection (1) of this section shall receive a moving expense allowance, determined according to regulations and schedules established by the agency, not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300), and in addition a dislocation allowance of two hundred dollars ($200).
  3. Any displaced person who moves or discontinues his business or farm operation who elects to accept the payment authorized by this subsection in lieu of the payment authorized by subsection (1) of this section, shall receive a fixed relocation payment in an amount equal to the average annual net earnings of the business or farm operation, except that the payment shall not be less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000). In the case of a business, no payment shall be made under this subsection unless the agency is satisfied that the business cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of patronage, and is not a part of a commercial enterprise having at least one (1) other establishment not being acquired which is engaged in the same or similar business. In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, to be eligible for the payment authorized by this subsection the business or farm operation must make its financial statements, accounting records, and state income tax returns available to the agency for audit for confidential use in determining the payment or payments authorized by this subsection. Such financial statements, accounting records and state income tax returns shall be subject to disclosure according to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code.
  4. If any agency determines that property, contiguous with property acquired, owned or occupied by an individual, family, business or farm operation, has been damaged as the result of a public program or project, it shall offer the individual, family, business or farm operation the same compensation as it might offer to a displaced person under subsection (1), (2) or (3) of this section and under sections 40-2005 and 40-2007, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2004, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1990, ch. 213, § 51, p. 480; am. 2000, ch. 192, § 3, p. 472; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 104, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2004 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” in the last sentence of subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993 and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 should take effect July 1, 1990.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

§ 40-2005. Purchase assistance to relocating owner-occupant — Lease or down payment assistance to relocating tenant.

  1. In addition to the payments authorized by section 40-2004, Idaho Code, an agency shall make a payment to the owner of a dwelling, provided the dwelling has been owned and occupied by the owner for at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the first written offer for the acquisition of the property. The payment shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) and shall be the amount, which, when added to the acquisition payment, equals the reasonable cost required for a comparable dwelling determined in accordance with standards established by the agency to be suitable to accommodate the displaced owner. The payment shall be made only to a displaced owner who purchases and occupies a dwelling that meets standards established by the agency, not later than the end of a one (1) year period beginning on the date on which he received final payment of all costs of the acquired dwelling, or on the date on which he moves from the acquired dwelling, whichever is the later date. Payment under this subsection will include an amount which will compensate the displaced person for any increased interest costs which the person is required to pay for financing the acquisition of any comparable replacement dwelling. This amount will be paid only if the dwelling acquired by the agency was encumbered by a mortgage which was a valid lien on the dwelling for not less than one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the first written offer for the acquisition of the dwelling. The amount shall be equal to the excess in the aggregate interest and other debt service costs of that amount of the principal of the mortgage on the replacement dwelling which is equal to the unpaid balance of the mortgage on the acquired dwelling, over the remainder term of the mortgage on the acquired dwelling, reduced to discounted current value. The discounted rate shall be the prevailing interest rate paid on savings deposits by commercial banks in the general area in which the replacement dwelling is located. This amount shall also include reasonable expenses incurred by the displaced person for evidence of title, recording fees, and other closing costs incident to the purchase of the replacement dwelling, but shall not include prepaid expenses.
History.

(2) In addition to the payments authorized by section 40-2004, Idaho Code, any agency shall make a payment to any individual or family displaced from any dwelling not eligible to receive a payment under subsection (1) of this section, which dwelling was actually and lawfully occupied by the individual or family for at least ninety (90) days prior to the first written offer for the acquisition of the property. The payment, not to exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000), shall be the additional amount which is necessary to enable the individual or family to lease or rent for a period not to exceed four (4) years, or to make a down payment, including reasonable expenses incurred by the displaced person for evidence of title, recording fees, and other closing costs incident to the purchase of a dwelling of standards adequate to accommodate the individual or family in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities, except that if the amount exceeds two thousand dollars ($2,000) the person must equally match any payment in excess of two thousand dollars ($2,000), in making the down payment. History.

I.C.,§ 40-2005, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 192, § 4, p. 472.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2005 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

§ 40-2006. Housing replacement as last resort.

  1. If any federally-assisted program or project construction cannot commence because comparable replacement sale or rental housing is not available, and the agency determines that housing cannot otherwise be made available, it may take action as is necessary or appropriate to provide housing by use of funds authorized for the project.
  2. No displaced person shall be required to move from his dwelling on account of any federally-assisted program or project, unless the agency is satisfied that replacement housing is available to the person, within a reasonable period of time and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and individuals displaced, and reasonably accessible to their places of employment.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2006, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2006 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2007. Compensation for miscellaneous expenses.

In addition to amounts authorized by this chapter, any agency as a part of the cost of any public program or project, shall reimburse the owner of real property acquired for a project for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred for:

  1. Recording fees, transfer taxes, and similar expenses incidental to conveying the property;
  2. Penalty costs for prepayment of any mortgage entered into in good faith encumbering the real property if the mortgage is on record or has been filed for record under applicable state law on the date of final approval by the agency of the location of the project; and
  3. The pro rata share or portion of ad valorem taxes paid which are allocable to a period subsequent to the date of vesting of title in the state or the effective date of possession of the real property by the agency, whichever is earlier.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2007, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 192, § 5, p. 472.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2007 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

§ 40-2008. Computation of replacement housing payment during condemnation proceedings — Adjustment after judgment.

In the event an acquisition payment to an owner-occupant for a dwelling cannot be finally determined because condemnation proceedings may become necessary or are pending against the property, the replacement housing payment authorized by section 40-2005(1), Idaho Code, shall be made and computed as though the maximum offer of the state or agency for the property is the actual acquisition payment. In the event the final award and judgment rendered in the condemnation proceedings exceeds the state’s highest offer, any difference between the offer and the judgment shall be deducted from the replacement housing payment, but in no event shall the judgment be reduced by more than the amount of the replacement housing payment.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2008, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2008 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2009. Relocation payments not income.

No payment received under this chapter shall be considered as income for the purposes of the state personal income tax law or state corporation tax law, nor shall the payments be considered as income or resources to any recipient of public assistance and the payments shall not be deducted from the amount of aid to which the recipient would otherwise be entitled under the state public assistance laws, nor shall the payments be considered as income or resources for the purpose of determining the eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any persons for public assistance.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2009, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2009 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2010. Review of determinations.

Any displaced person aggrieved by a determination as to the eligibility for a payment authorized by this chapter, or the amount of the payment, may have his application reviewed. Proceedings for review of any action taken by the agency pursuant to this section shall be instituted under the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2010, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2010 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2011. Eminent domain damages unaffected.

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as creating, in any condemnation proceedings brought under the power of eminent domain, any element of damages not in existence under the laws of the state of Idaho on July 1, 1985.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2011, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2011 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

§ 40-2012. Federal uniform relocation assistance act.

  1. Regardless of any of the other provisions of title 40, chapter 20, Idaho Code, when any department, agency or instrumentality of the state, or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision, or any other public or private entity undertakes any project or activity subject to the provisions of the federal uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition policies act of 1970, as amended, public laws 91-646, and 100-17, title IV (hereinafter the federal uniform relocation act) which results in the acquisition of real property or in any person or persons being displaced from their homes, businesses, or farms, such state department, agency or instrumentality, county, municipality or other political subdivision, or other public or private entity is hereby authorized to provide relocation assistance, and to make relocation payments to such displaced person and to do such other acts and follow such procedures and practices as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of the federal uniform relocation act.
  2. Any payment made or to be made under the authority granted herein shall be for compensating or reimbursing the displaced person or owner of real property in accordance with the requirements of the federal uniform relocation act and such payments shall not for any purpose be deemed or considered compensation for real property acquired or compensation for damages to remaining property.
  3. The Idaho transportation department is authorized to issue such regulations and procedures as it determines to be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2012, as added by 1988, ch. 136, § 1, p. 243.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2012 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Federal References.

The federal uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition policies act of 1970, referred to in this section, is compiled as 42 USCS § 4601 et seq.

§ 40-2013. Costs and attorney’s fees.

Any moving and relocation costs which will accrue as a result of a condemnation undertaken pursuant to chapter 7, title 7, Idaho Code, or pursuant to this chapter, shall be paid by the condemner as required by law. If such costs are not paid by the condemner, the owner of the property shall be awarded attorney’s fees and costs incurred to recover the same.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2013, as added by 2000, ch. 192, § 6, p. 472.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2013 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2001.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2000, ch. 192 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2000.

Chapter 21 REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Sec.

§ 40-2101. Short title.

This chapter may be known and cited as the “Regional Public Transportation Authority Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2101, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former title 40, chapter 21, consisting of§§ 40-2101 to 40-2138, which comprised I.C.A.,§§ 39-2021 to 39-2032, as added by 1943, ch. 120, § 1, p. 230; 1949, ch. 123, §§ 1 to 11, p. 217; am. 1951, ch. 37, § 1, p. 48; 1959, ch. 122, §§ 1 to 7, p. 266; 1978, ch. 281, §§ 1, 2, p. 683, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Compiler’s Notes.

Both S.L. 1994, ch. 327 and S.L. 1994, ch. 331 enacted a chapter 21 in title 40. The provisions enacted by S.L. 1994, ch. 33 were redesignated, through the use of brackets, as chapter 22 of title 40. That redesignation was made permanent by S.L. 2005, ch. 25.

§ 40-2102. Policy of state.

It is hereby recognized by the legislature of the state of Idaho that, as the population and economy of areas of this state grow, the total needs for mobility of commerce and people cannot be met solely with highway and road systems; that motor vehicle congestion and air quality problems result which may adversely affect health and safety; that there are a variety of persons who are elderly, who have disabilities, who live in rural areas or who otherwise require public transportation services for their general welfare; and that prosperous commerce and industry depend upon effective regional systems of transportation. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the state to maintain a state commitment to improve public transportation; to increase the use of transportation alternatives to single occupancy motor vehicles; to promote cooperative agreements among governmental entities in providing public transportation services; and to attain greater efficiency in the use of public transportation funds in a manner consistent with the needs, health, safety and general welfare of the people of Idaho.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2102, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2102 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2103. Definitions.

  1. “Authority” means the regional public transportation authority.
  2. “Board” means the governing body of the regional public transportation authority.
  3. “City” means an incorporated city.
  4. “Commission” means the board of county commissioners or the board of commissioners of a single county-wide highway district.
  5. “Public transportation service” means, without limitation, fixed transit routes; scheduled or unscheduled transit service provided by motor vehicle, bus, rail, van, aerial tramway and other modes of public conveyance; paratransit service for the elderly and disabled; shuttle and commuter service between cities, counties, health care facilities, employment centers, educational institutions or park-and-ride locations; subscription van and car-pooling service; and transportation services unique to social service programs.
  6. “Region” means the geographical area encompassed by an authority which may include all of a county or contiguous parts of one (1) or more counties.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2103, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 1, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2103 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2104. Purpose of authority.

The purpose of an authority created pursuant to this chapter is to establish a single governmental agency oriented entirely toward public transportation needs within each county or region that deems such an agency necessary. This authority, a political subdivision of the state of Idaho, is under the supervision of and directly responsible to local governments, and shall provide public transportation services, encourage private transportation programs and coordinate both public and private transportation programs, services and support functions.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2104, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 2, p. 1177; am. 2003, ch. 210, § 1, p. 555.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2104 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2104.

§ 40-2105. Creation of authority — Voter approval — Name.

Authorities may be established in one (1) of the following ways:

    1. County-wide authorities. A city or commission by resolution may call for an election to establish a regional public transportation authority in the county to carry out the purposes of this chapter. The entire geographical area of the county must be included within the jurisdiction of an authority created pursuant to this subsection. (1)(a) County-wide authorities. A city or commission by resolution may call for an election to establish a regional public transportation authority in the county to carry out the purposes of this chapter. The entire geographical area of the county must be included within the jurisdiction of an authority created pursuant to this subsection.
    2. The ballot question shall seek voter approval of the establishment of the authority.
    1. Regional authorities. A city or commission may adopt a resolution proposing to establish an authority which contains contiguous parts of one (1) or more counties. The resolutions shall include a legal description of a contiguous region encompassed by the proposed authority and specifically name each city and county wholly or partially included therein. Boundaries of the proposed authority shall conform insofar as possible to existing boundaries dividing voting precincts. (2)(a) Regional authorities. A city or commission may adopt a resolution proposing to establish an authority which contains contiguous parts of one (1) or more counties. The resolutions shall include a legal description of a contiguous region encompassed by the proposed authority and specifically name each city and county wholly or partially included therein. Boundaries of the proposed authority shall conform insofar as possible to existing boundaries dividing voting precincts.
    2. A certified copy of the resolution shall be transmitted by registered mail to the chief elected official of each city and county wholly or partially included in the proposed region.
    3. Each city and county shall, by resolution, either approve without alteration or reject the resolution proposing the establishment of an authority and transmit a certified copy to the clerk or recorder of the initiating city or commission. If a city or county fails to act upon the resolution proposing the establishment of an authority within sixty (60) days after receipt of the certified copy, the city or county is deemed to have rejected the resolution.
    4. If the city councils and county commissions of all cities and counties wholly or partially included in the proposed region approve the resolution proposing the establishment of an authority, the question shall be submitted for voter approval. The ballot question shall generally describe the area which is proposed to be included in the authority, identify each city and county which will be located either wholly or partially within the authority and shall seek voter approval of the establishment of the authority.
  1. Authorization to establish a regional public transportation authority may be made only by the registered voters of the region at an election held at least sixty (60) days after the final resolution is adopted and in conformity with section 34-106, Idaho Code. A simple majority of votes cast on the question shall be necessary to establish the authority.
  2. An authority created pursuant to this act shall be named the “....... (name of authority) REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.” In the event two (2) or more authorities should by cooperative agreement merge their services the name may be appropriately changed by a majority vote of the board of each authority.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2105, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 3, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.
Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in subsection (4) refers to S.L. 1994, ch. 327, which is codified as§§ 40-2101 to 40-2114.

§ 40-2106. Authority board.

  1. Each authority shall have a governing board appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the governing bodies of counties, incorporated cities and highway districts located wholly or partially within the authority.
  2. The board initially shall be composed of not less than five (5) members selected as follows: two (2) members representing each board of county commissioners; one (1) member representing highway district commissions wholly or partially contained within the region; two (2) members representing each city with a population of twenty-five thousand (25,000) or more; and one (1) member representing each city with a population of less than twenty-five thousand (25,000). Board composition subsequently may be modified pursuant to subsection (7) of this section.
  3. Board members shall be appointed by resolution of the appointing agency and shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing agency. Board members may be elected officials of the appointing agency or they may be representatives empowered by the agency to act in its best interests. The highway district board member shall be appointed by the board of commissioners of the highway district in counties with a single county-wide highway district or, in counties with more than one (1) highway district, by the board of county commissioners in consultation with all highway district commissions wholly or partially contained within the region.
  4. Ex officio members may be appointed to the authority board by any city or commission or by the board itself and shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing entity.
  5. Board members may be compensated forty dollars ($40.00) for each day in the actual performance of duties, but the total amount to be received as compensation shall not exceed the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per year. Actual expenses shall be paid in addition to compensation. The payment for expenses shall be paid from funds of the authority upon presentation of itemized vouchers, signed by the board member and under oath made to the secretary of the authority.
  6. The authority shall be liable and responsible for the actions of the board members and employees of the authority when the board members and employees are performing their duties on behalf of the authority.
  7. Composition of the board may be modified from time to time by the board, provided that:
    1. The board adopts by majority vote at a regularly scheduled meeting a statement of intent to revise the board composition and a complete description of the proposed revision; and
    2. The board submits the statement of intent and proposed revision to the chief elected official of each city and commission within the authority for review and comment; and
    3. Each city or commission is provided a minimum of sixty (60) days in which to comment; and
    4. The board adopts a resolution revising the board composition by the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of all board members at a regularly scheduled meeting.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2106, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 4, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES
Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2106 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2107. Board procedures.

  1. At its first meeting following the appointment of all members, the board shall elect a chairman and a vice chairman from their number and appoint a secretary and a treasurer who need not be from their number for terms fixed by them. The offices of the secretary and treasurer may be filled by the same person. Certified copies of all appointments under the hand of the chairman and seal of the authority shall be filed with the clerk of each county and with the clerk of each city and with the secretary of each highway district in the region.
  2. A majority of the board members constitutes a quorum for the conduct of business. A majority of board members present at a board meeting at which a quorum has been established may exercise all of the powers of the full board except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
  3. As soon as practicable after organization the board shall designate a day, hour and place at which regular meetings shall be held. Minutes of all meetings must show what business was conducted, what votes were taken and what bills were submitted, considered, allowed or rejected. The secretary shall make a list of all bills presented, showing to whom payable, for what services or materials, the amount claimed and the amount allowed. The list shall be signed by the chairman and attested by the secretary.
  4. All meetings of the board shall be public and all records of the authority shall be open to the inspection of the public during normal business hours. Special meetings of the board may be held upon the call of the board chairman or a majority of the board. The secretary must give each member not joining in the order five (5) days’ notice of any special meeting.
  5. The authority treasurer shall execute and file with the authority secretary an official bond in an amount of money equal to an amount that may come into his hands as treasurer but in no case shall the amount of the bond be less than an amount fixed by the board. The cost of such bond shall be a necessary expense paid by the authority.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2107, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 5, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2107 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2108. Corporate powers of an authority.

A regional public transportation authority has power:

  1. To sue and be sued;
  2. To raise and expend funds as provided in this chapter;
  3. To issue revenue bonds;
  4. To adopt and use an official seal;
  5. To purchase and hold lands, make contracts, purchase and hold personal property as may be necessary or convenient for the purposes of this act, and to sell and exchange real and personal property. The board shall first adopt a resolution finding that the property to be sold or exchanged is no longer needed by or useful to the district; that a public hearing is to be held, of which hearing notice shall be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2108, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2108 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2109. Powers and duties of board.

  1. Only one (1) regional public transportation authority shall exist within a county and when established pursuant to this chapter the authority will have exclusive jurisdiction over all publicly funded or publicly subsidized transportation services and programs except those transportation services and programs under the jurisdiction of public school districts and law enforcement agencies.
  2. The authority may provide public transportation services on fixed or unfixed routes; public transportation services on fixed or unfixed schedules; paratransit services for the elderly and people with disabilities as defined in the Americans with disabilities act; special services to accommodate community celebrations, sporting events and entertainment open to the public; public transportation services between cities, rural areas, park-and-ride facilities, employment centers, health care facilities, universities and commercial and shopping areas; commuter services between communities; van or car pool programs.
  3. The authority shall fix by resolution the fares and fees to be charged those who use its public transportation services. Prior to adopting any such resolution, the board shall publish proposed fares and fees in at least one (1) issue of a newspaper having general circulation in the region and shall hold at least one (1) public hearing on the proposed fares and fees.
  4. The authority may establish, fund, control and operate the administrative, equipment maintenance, servicing, storage, fueling, and other facilities required to support a safe and efficient public transportation system. In carrying out the purposes of this chapter, the authority may employ personnel, contract for services with public and private agencies and retain legal and other professional counsel.
  5. The board may adopt resolutions consistent with law, as necessary, for carrying out the purposes of this chapter and discharging all powers and duties conferred to the authority pursuant to this chapter.
  6. The authority shall have an annual audit made of the financial affairs of the authority as required in section 67-450B, Idaho Code, by the first day of December following the close of the fiscal year.
  7. The authority may enter into cooperative agreements with the state, other authorities, counties, cities and highway districts under the provisions of section 67-2328, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2109, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 6, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2109 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

Federal References.

The Americans with disabilities act, referred to in subsection (2), is codified as 42 USCS § 12101 et seq.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

A.L.R.

A.L.R. — Who is recipient of, and what constitutes program or activity receiving, federal financial assistance for purposes of § 504 of Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 794), which prohibits any program or activity receiving financial assistance from discriminating on basis of disability. 160 A.L.R. Fed. 297.

When are public entities required to provide services, programs, or activities to disabled individuals under Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12132. 160 A.L.R. Fed. 637.

When does a public entity discriminate against individuals in its provision of services, programs, or activities under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12132. 163 A.L.R. Fed. 339.

§ 40-2110. Contributions.

The counties, cities, highway districts and other governmental entities within the region may, at their discretion, enter into a cooperative agreement with the authority in order to contribute funds from any source, provide services-in-kind and loan or convey real and personal property to the authority in recognition of costs of the authority, to maintain continuity of existing public transportation services, or to implement new services.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2110, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 7, p. 1177.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2110 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2111. Issuance of revenue bonds.

A regional public transportation authority may issue revenue bonds in the same manner and form as under the municipal bond law contained in chapter 10, title 50, Idaho Code, provided that the ordinance required therein shall be by resolution of the board. For the purpose of this section, the term “city” in the municipal bond law shall include the term “regional public transportation authority.”

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2111, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2111 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

§ 40-2112. Budget.

  1. The board shall annually adopt a budget and cause a public hearing to be held upon the budget.
  2. Notice of the budget hearing shall be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting in at least one (1) conspicuous place in each county within the boundaries of the regional public transportation authority and at the administrative offices of the regional public transportation authority. A copy of the notice shall also be published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code. The place, hour and day of the hearing shall be specified in the notice, as well as the place where the budget may be examined prior to the hearing. A full and complete copy of the proposed budget shall be published with and as a part of the publication of the notice of hearing.
  3. The budget shall be available for public inspection from and after the date of the posting of notice of hearing at a place and during business hours as the board may direct.
  4. A quorum of the board shall attend the hearing and explain the proposed budget and hear any and all objections to it.
  5. The budget shall be completed and finalized not later than the Tuesday following the first Monday in September for the ensuing fiscal year.
  6. The fiscal year of the authority shall commence on the first day of October of each year.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2112, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 1996, ch. 353, § 8, p. 1177; am. 2003, ch. 210, § 2, p. 555.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2112 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-4101.

§ 40-2113. Exemption from taxation.

It is hereby found, determined and declared that the creation of a regional public transportation authority is in all respects for the benefit of the people of the state of Idaho, for the improvement of their welfare and prosperity, and for the promotion of their transportation, and is a public purpose and that projects and services operated by authorities are essential parts of the public transportation system, and that such authorities will be performing essential governmental functions in the exercise of the powers conferred upon them by this chapter. The state of Idaho declares that authorities shall be required to pay no taxes or assessments upon any of the property acquired by them or under their respective jurisdiction, control, possession, or supervision or upon the activities of authorities in the operation and maintenance of projects and services, or upon any charges, fees, revenues, or other income received by authorities, or upon special fuels used in motor vehicles owned or leased and operated by authorities, and that the bonds of authorities and the income therefrom shall at all times be exempt from taxation. Regional public transportation authorities created pursuant to this chapter shall be exempt from the sales tax imposed under the provisions of section 63-3621, Idaho Code, shall be issued a tax exemption certificate as provided for in section 63-3622, Idaho Code, and shall be entitled to such credits and refunds as other political subdivisions of the state of Idaho are entitled under section 63-2423, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2113, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052; am. 2004, ch. 152, § 1, p. 487.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2113 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 152 declared an emergency and made the amendment of this section retroactively effective to July 1, 2002. Approved March 23, 2004.

§ 40-2114. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2114, as added by 1994, ch. 327, § 1, p. 1052.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2114 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2101.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in this section refers to S.L. 1994, ch. 327, which is codified as§§ 40-2101 to 40-2114.

Chapter 22 DETACHMENT OF TERRITORY BY PETITION AND ORGANIZATION OF NEW DISTRICT

Sec.

§ 40-2201. Highway districts subject to detachment.

A portion of the territory of an existing highway district, provided that the district is not a single county-wide highway district organized under the provisions of chapter 14, title 40, Idaho Code, whether the district is situated wholly in one (1) or more counties, may be detached from the highway district and established as a new highway district as provided in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2101, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 82, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former title 40 of chapter 22, which consisted of§§ 40-2201 to 40-2218, was repealed as follows:

40-2201. S.L. 1913, ch. 179, § 9, p. 564; reen. C.L. 63:9; C.S., § 1580; I.C.A., § 39-2101; am. 1935 (2nd E.S.), ch. 4, § 1, p. 9. Repealed by S.L. 1950 (1st E.S.), ch. 87, § 24, p. 117.

40-2202, 40-2203. 1913, ch. 179, § 6, p. 560; am. 1915, ch. 64, § 5, p. 161; 1913, ch. 179, § 6a, as added by 1915, ch. 64, § 6, p. 161; reen. C.L. 63:6 and 63:6a; C.S., §§ 1572, 1573; I.C.A.,§§ 39-2102, 39-2103; am. 1974, ch. 12, §§ 36, 37, p. 61. Repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-2206. 1913, ch. 179, § 7b, as added by 1915, ch. 64, § 8, subd. 7b, p. 162; reen. C.L. 63:7b; am. 1919, ch. 156, § 1, p. 515; C.S., § 1576; am. 1921, ch. 183, § 1, p. 378; I.C.A.,§ 39-2106; am. 1937, ch. 58, § 1, p. 78; am. 1939, ch. 34, § 1, p. 72; am. 1950 (E.S.), ch. 87, § 23, p. 117; am. 1951, ch. 91, § 1, p. 163; am. 1974, ch. 12, § 38, p. 61. Repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-2210. 1913, ch. 179, § 10, p. 565; am. 1915, ch. 35, §  1, p. 114; 1915, ch. 64, § 11, p. 164; reen. C.L. 63:10; C.S., § 1581; I.C.A.,§ 39-2110; 1983, ch. 179, § 7, p. 487; 1984, ch. 195, § 6, p. 445; 1984, ch. 236, § 1, p. 564; 1985, ch. 172, § 1, p. 450. Repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

40-2211. 1913, ch. 179, § 10a, as added by 1915, ch. 64, § 12, p. 164; reen. C.L. 63:10a; C.S., § 1582; am. 1923, ch. 115, § 1, p. 147; am. 1925, ch. 177, § 8, p. 315; am. 1929, ch. 195, § 7, p. 362; am. 1931, ch. 154, § 1, p. 259; I.C.A.,§ 39-2111; am. 1950 (E.S.), ch. 80, § 1, p. 107; am. 1963, ch. 171, § 1, p. 495. Repealed by S.L. 1983, ch. 179, § 4. 40-2212. 1913, ch. 179, § 11, p. 565; am. 1915, ch. 64, § 13, p. 165; compiled and reen. C.L. 63:11; C.S., § 1583; I.C.A.,§ 39-2112; 1933, ch. 19, § 1, p. 25; 1937, ch. 248, § 2, p. 446; 1951, ch. 160, § 1, p. 355; 1974, ch. 12, § 39, p. 61. Repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Compiler’s Notes.

Both S.L. 1994, ch. 327 and S.L. 1994, ch. 331 enacted a chapter 21 in title 40. The provisions enacted by S.L. 1994, ch. 33 were redesignated, through the use of brackets, as chapter 22 of title 40. That redesignation was made permanent by S.L. 2005, ch. 25.

§ 40-2202. Petition.

Whenever electors of a portion of the territory embraced in any existing highway district desire that their portion be detached from the highway district and organized into a new highway district, a petition describing the territory by its boundaries, signed by not less than ten (10) electors qualified to vote at a highway district election and residing in the territory sought to be detached shall be presented to the commissioners of the highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2102, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 83, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2202 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2203. Order for hearing upon petition.

Immediately upon its next regular meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose, the highway district commissioners shall by order or resolution fix a time and place for a hearing of the petition, which time shall not be less than twenty-one (21) days from and after the date of the first publication of the notice of the petition and of the hearing.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2103, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 84, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2203 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2204. Notice of hearing and petition.

The highway district commissioners shall require their clerk to have a notice published in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, setting forth the fact that a petition has been filed with the commissioners. The notice shall state the name of the highway district from which territory is proposed to be detached and organized into a new highway district; a concise description of the boundaries of the territory so proposed to be detached and organized into a new highway district; the current bonded and current warrant indebtedness of the district; a notice of the time and place when and where the petition will be heard by the highway district commissioners; and notice that any elector qualified to vote at an election of the highway district may, prior to or at the time of the hearing, file with the highway district clerk written objections to the proposed detachment and organization of said territory.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2104, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 85, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2204 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2205. Hearing — Order for detachment and organization.

At the time and place specified in the notice, the highway district commissioners shall consider the petition and all written objections filed with them and shall hear all persons in relation to it. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, which may be continued from day to day, if the commissioners shall determine that the detachment from the highway district of the territory described in the petition is practicable and to the best interests of the territory and of the highway district, they shall, within ten (10) days, make and enter an order directing that the territory be detached from the highway district and be organized into a new highway district at a date not less than thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days from and after the date of the order.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2105, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 86, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2205 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2206. New highway district — Establishment of subdistricts.

When the commissioners of the existing highway district order the establishment of a new highway district, they shall have the duty to name the new highway district and to divide the new highway district into three (3) subdistricts, as nearly equal in population, area and mileage as practicable, to be known as highway commissioners subdistricts one, two and three. Subdistricts may be revised or modified as changes in conditions demand. Not more than one (1) of the highway district commissioners shall be an elector of the same highway subdistrict.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2106, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 87, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2206 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2207. First commissioners of new highway district.

The existing highway district commissioners shall appoint a qualified elector to serve as a highway district commissioner for each of the subdistricts of the new highway district. The commissioners shall provide each of the commissioners appointed to the new highway district with a certificate of appointment. Each appointed highway district commissioner shall take and subscribe the official oath, which oath shall be filed in the office of the newly organized highway district commissioners. The first commissioners shall serve until the next highway district election as specified in section 40-1305, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2107, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 88, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2207 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2208. Organization and operation of new highway district.

The newly organized highway district shall be organized and operated in accordance with the provisions of chapter 13, title 40, Idaho Code, except for the provisions of sections 40-1323, 40-1333 and 40-1334, Idaho Code. All of the public highways, public rights-of-way and public streets located within the boundaries of any unincorporated city located within the new highway district shall be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the new highway district and such highways and streets shall be eligible for maintenance and construction with highway district funds in the same manner as any other highways in the highway district system.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2108, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 89, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2208 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 40-1334, referenced in this section, was repealed by S.L. 1999, ch. 332, § 16, p. 864, effective July 1, 1999.

§ 40-2209. Effect of detachment of territory — Apportionment of indebtedness.

The detachment of territory from the district shall be deemed to relate only to the operations of the district subsequent to the order of detachment. Territory detached and all taxable property in that territory shall be and remain liable for the proportionate share of all bonded, warrant, and other indebtedness incurred by the district prior to the time of detachment. The proportionate share of the indebtedness of the district incurred prior to the order of detachment shall be borne by the detached territory and shall be computed as provided in section 40-1609, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2109, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 90, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2209 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2210. Validity of outstanding bonds and warrants not affected.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as impairing the validity of any bonds or warrants of a highway district outstanding at the time of the detachment of any territory.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2110, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 91, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2210 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2211. Filing of certified copy of order.

The commissioners shall cause a certified copy of the order of detachment of territory and organization of the new highway district to be filed for record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the highway district is situate, and shall transmit a certified copy of the order to the highway district commissioners of the newly organized highway district.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2111, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 92, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2211 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2212. Highway distribution account — Eligibility.

After the new highway district has been organized and in operation for a full quarter of a calendar year, the newly organized highway district shall be eligible for apportionment of funds from the highway distribution account as provided in section 40-709, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2112, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 93, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2212 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

§ 40-2213. Transfer of property, funds and materiel.

Except for the highways, bridges, public streets and public rights-of-way within the detached territory, none of the property, either real or personal, or any funds, materiel, supplies or equipment owned and under the control of the highway district from which the territory was detached shall be transferred to the newly organized highway district unless specifically authorized in writing by the highway district owning and controlling such property. However, the highway district organizing the new highway district may provide property, funds, personnel, materiel or services to the newly organized highway district in accordance with the provisions of section 67-2328, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2113, as added by 1994, ch. 331, § 1, p. 1060; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 94, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2213 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2201.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1994, ch. 331 declared an emergency. Approved March 31, 1994.

Chapter 23 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec.

§ 40-2301. Right of entry to make surveys.

Agents and employees of the board, county commissioners and highway district commissioners shall have the right to enter upon any land to make surveys for any of the purposes of this title in the manner provided by law. Agents and employees of the board, county commissioners and highway district commissioners who are licensed as, or under the direction of, professional land surveyors shall have the right to enter upon any land to set right-of-way monuments for the purposes of this title in the manner provided by law.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2301, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 1994, ch. 364, § 3, p. 1139.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-2301 to 40-2306, which comprised 1921, ch. 99, §§ 1 to 6, p. 224; I.C.A.,§§ 39-2201 to 39-2206; am. 1974, ch. 12, §§ 43, 44, p. 61, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-2302. Public acquires fee simple title — Record and dedication of highways.

  1. By taking or accepting land for a highway, the public acquires the fee simple title to the property. The person or persons having jurisdiction of the highway may take or accept lesser estate as they may deem requisite for their purposes.
  2. In all cases where consent to use the right-of-way for a highway is voluntarily given, purchased, or condemned and paid for, either an instrument in writing conveying the right-of-way and incidents to it, signed and acknowledged by the party making it, or a certified copy of the decree of the court condemning it, must be made, filed and recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land conveyed or condemned shall be particularly described.
  3. No highway dedicated by the owner to the public shall be deemed a public highway, or be under the use or control of a county or highway district unless the dedication shall be accepted and confirmed by the commissioners of the county or highway district.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2302, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2302 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2301.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Previous Easement.

Where municipal corporation acquired an easement for highway over land upon which a prior easement exists, it took it subject to previous easement. City of Twin Falls v. Harlan, 27 Idaho 769, 151 P. 1191 (1915).

Vacation of Easement Released.

Where public highway had run diagonally across a forty (40) acre tract owned by plaintiff, and proper authorities had established a new highway along line of said forty (40) acre tract, at the instance and request of owner, and vacated the “diagonal road,” conditioned on plaintiff’s placing newly established highway in a good and passable condition as a public highway, public had a right to travel “diagonal road” until such condition was complied with, and vacation of such “diagonal road” did not take place until the new highway was placed in proper condition. Rasmussen v. Silk, 26 Idaho 341, 143 P. 525 (1941).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.
ALR.

Construction of highway through park as violation of use to which park property may be devoted. 60 A.L.R.3d 581.

Private improvement of land dedicated but not used as street as estopping public rights. 36 A.L.R.4th 625.

§ 40-2303. Public use of private dam or bridge.

No right shall be deemed to have vested in the public for highway or other purposes, where free use may be granted to the public to a right-of-way for the purposes of travel, over and upon any dam or bridge constructed over and across any of the streams of this state, and owned by any person.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2303, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2303 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2301.

§ 40-2304. Construction of sidewalks.

Any owner or occupant of land may construct a sidewalk on the highway along the line of his land subject to authority conferred by law on the respective highway or county commissioners and the director of highways. Any person using the sidewalk with a horse or team without permission of the owner, is liable to the owner or occupant in the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each trespass, and for all damages suffered.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2304, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2304 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2301.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
ALR.

Abutting owner’s liability for injury from ice formed on sidewalk by discharge of precipitation due to artificial conditions on premises. 18 A.L.R.3d 428.

Proceeding in the dark along outside path or walkway as contributory negligence. 22 A.L.R.3d 599.

Validity and construction of provision prohibiting or regulating advertising sign overhanging street or sidewalk. 80 A.L.R.3d 687.

§ 40-2305. Personal delivery devices.

  1. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a personal delivery device as defined in section 49-117, Idaho Code, is authorized to operate on sidewalks and crosswalks; provided, however, that this section does not restrict a county, municipality or highway district from otherwise adopting regulations for the safe operation of personal delivery devices.
  2. All personal delivery devices shall obey all traffic and pedestrian control devices and signs.
  3. A personal delivery device operating on sidewalks and crosswalks has all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances, except that the personal delivery device shall not unreasonably interfere with pedestrians or traffic, and shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians on sidewalks and crosswalks.
  4. All personal delivery devices shall include a plate or marker that identifies the name and contact information of the operator of the personal delivery device and a unique identifying device number.
  5. All personal delivery devices shall be equipped with a braking system that, when active or engaged, will enable the personal delivery device to come to a controlled stop.
  6. No personal delivery device shall transport hazardous materials or hazardous wastes regulated pursuant to chapter 22, title 49, Idaho Code.
  7. No personal delivery device shall be operated on a public highway in the state, except to the extent necessary to cross a crosswalk.
  8. No personal delivery device shall operate on a sidewalk or crosswalk unless the personal delivery device operator is actively controlling or monitoring the navigation and operation of the personal delivery device.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2305, as added by 2017, ch. 147, § 4, p. 357.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 43-2305, Adjoining owners may plant trees — Penalty for injury, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2305, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 1996, ch. 393, § 1, effective March 20, 1996.

Another former§ 40-2305 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2301.

§ 40-2306. Felling tree into highway — Penalty.

Whoever cuts down a tree so that it falls upon a highway shall remove the tree, and is liable to a penalty of ten dollars ($10.00) for every day the tree remains on the highway.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2306, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2306 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2301.

§ 40-2307. Removal of fallen trees.

Any person may notify the occupant or owner of any land from which a tree or other obstruction has fallen upon any highway to remove the tree or obstruction. If it is not removed, the owner or occupant is liable to a penalty of ten dollars ($10.00) for every day until it is removed, in addition to the cost of removal.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2307, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2308. Corporations may lay tracks and water mains.

Every gas, water, or railroad corporation has the power to lay conductors and tracks through the public ways and squares in any city with the consent of the city authorities, and under reasonable regulations and for just compensation, as the city authorities and the law prescribe.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2308, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Utility Franchises.

The highway district legislation contained in title 40, chapters 13 and 14, does not supersede the well-established law vesting power to grant franchises to utilities in the cities. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

Cities have the right to own and operate utilities and provide those services to their residents, and their surrender of this right is valid consideration for the franchise fee charged to the utilities. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

The charging of a fee for a utility franchise is reasonable compensation and consideration to the cities as expressly allowed by Const., Art. 15, § 2 and this section. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp., 118 Idaho 136, 795 P.2d 298 (1990).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Governmental Powers.

Where city granted right of way to railway company to lay its tracks along its streets, such city was exercising its governmental powers granted to it by the constitution and the statutes and did not create a liability against municipality for damages occasioned by railway company exercising that right. Trueman v. Village of St. Maries, 21 Idaho 632, 123 P. 508 (1912).

Removal of Mains.

Unincorporated village was not required to obtain consent of public utilities commission before requiring removal of pipes and apparatus of a private water company, though water company as a public utility was subject to regulation by the commission, since municipalities retain the right to control and maintain their streets and alleys. Village of Lapwai v. Alligier, 78 Idaho 124, 299 P.2d 475 (1956).

Termination of Franchise.

License granted by unincorporated village for the construction and operation of a waterworks for a period of 25 years, which was not renewed at the end of the 25 year period, could be terminated by the village as though the license was an expired franchise. Village of Lapwai v. Alligier, 78 Idaho 124, 299 P.2d 475 (1956).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Cities and counties in Idaho almost certainly have authority under current state law to franchise cable television companies. With general franchising authority under state law, federal law allows cities and counties to regulate the basic cable television service rate and charge a franchise fee, both subject to the conditions of federal law.OAG 94-5.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
ALR.

Liability of one other than electric power or light company or its employee for interruption, failure, or inadequacy of electric power. 15 A.L.R.4th 1148.

Highway construction contractor’s liability for injuries to third persons by materials or debris on highway during course of construction or repair. 3 A.L.R.4th 770.

§ 40-2309. Railroad crossings.

Whenever highways are laid out to cross railroads on public lands, the owners or corporations using the same highway shall, at their own expense, so prepare the highway that it may cross without danger or delay, and when the right-of-way for a public highway is obtained through the judgment of any court, over any railroad, no damage shall be awarded for the simple right to cross.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2309, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2310. Cattle guards across roads — Landowner’s right to construct — Gates.

  1. The owner, or lessee of any land crossed by any highway, except highways maintained by the department, who encloses the land with a lawful fence, shall, with the consent of the commissioners, highway district commissioners, or other governing body having jurisdiction over the highway, have the right to enclose the land, by erecting or constructing cattle guards across the highway. Cattle guards shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications as the respective commissioners or other governing body having jurisdiction of the highway shall prescribe.
  2. Any owner or lessee of land constructing a cattle guard across a highway under the provisions of subsection (1) above, shall cause a gate not less than twelve (12) feet long to be constructed and maintained in the fence connected to the cattle guard. The gate shall not be more than thirty-three (33) feet from the highway. The surface of the guard adjoining the highway and gate shall be so leveled and maintained that a vehicle can pass from the highway through the gate on either side of the fence, and the gate shall be unlocked at all times.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2310, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-2311. Penalty for defacing or destroying signs, signposts or facilities.

It shall be unlawful for any person to deface or destroy any signs, signposts, guideposts, or any inscription on them, or facilities erected by or under the direction of the board, a director of highways, county, or highway district commissioners. Any person found guilty shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. The defacing or destroying of each sign, signpost, guidepost, or inscription, or facility shall constitute a separate offense.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2311, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

§ 40-2312. Width of highways.

  1. Where the width of a highway is stated in the plat, dedication, deed, easement, agreement, official road book, determination or other document or by an oral agreement supported by clear and convincing evidence that effectively conveys, creates, recognizes or modifies the highway or establishes the width, that width shall control.
  2. Where no width is established as provided for in subsection (1) of this section and where subsection (3) of this section is not applicable, such highways, except bridges and those located within cities, shall be not less than fifty (50) feet wide.
  3. Highways that at the time of a validation or judicial proceeding are not located on land owned by the United States or the state of Idaho or on land entirely surrounded by land owned by the United States or the state of Idaho, and that have not received maintenance at the expense of the public in at least three (3) years during the previous fifteen (15) years, shall be declared to be of such width, and none greater, as is sufficient to accommodate:
    1. The existing physical road surface;
    2. Existing uses of the highway;
    3. Existing features included within the definition of highways in section 40-109(5), Idaho Code;
    4. Such space for existing utilities as has historically been required for ongoing maintenance, replacement and upgrade of such utilities; and
    5. Space reasonably required for maintenance, motorist and pedestrian safety, necessary to maintain existing uses of the highway.
  4. Nothing in this section shall diminish or otherwise limit the authority and rights of irrigation districts, canal companies or other such entities as provided in chapters 11 and 12, title 42, Idaho Code.
  5. Nothing in this section shall diminish or otherwise limit any right of eminent domain as set forth in chapter 7, title 7, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2312, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2013, ch. 239, § 6, p. 560.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 239, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Legislative Intent.
Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2013, ch. 239 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 2013.

CASE NOTES

Applicability.

District court’s determination that a road was a public highway by prescription as defined by§ 40-202(3) did not violate the owners’ rights to procedural and substantive due process or result in an unconstitutional taking because the owners were put on notice by the public use of the road and had a hearing; there was a rational basis for the application of this section to fix the width of the right-of-way and an inverse condemnation claim was time-barred under§ 5-224. Halvorson v. N. Latah County Highway Dist., 151 Idaho 196, 254 P.3d 497, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 826, 132 S. Ct. 118, 181 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2011).

Cited

Burrup v. Stanger, 114 Idaho 50, 753 P.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1988); Sopatyk v. Lemhi County, 151 Idaho 809, 264 P.3d 916 (2011).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Highways by Prescription.

Width of highways established by prescription or public use had to be determined from a consideration of circumstances peculiar to each case, and was presumed to be 50 feet, unless facts clearly indicated that owner limited width of said road prior to time it became a highway by user. Meservey v. Gulliford, 14 Idaho 133, 93 P. 780 (1908).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-2313. Trails for livestock — Laying out — Rules concerning use — Penalty.

  1. County or highway commissioners are authorized to lay out highways or designate existing highways, within their respective jurisdictions, to be used as trails for livestock. These highways may be of a width as determined by the respective commissioners, and they may lay out, alter, establish and secure lands for those highways in the same manner and under the same provisions as the laying out, or establishing, or securing rights-of-way for regular highways. A regular highway not established or designated as a livestock trail under the provisions of this section may be used for trailing livestock in a number and at a time as may be indicated in rules and regulations made for that purpose by the respective commissioners.
  2. Rules and regulations shall be entered on the minutes of the respective commissioners. When highways are provided by counties or districts and are available for use as livestock trails, the respective commissioners may by rule or regulation prohibit the use of any regular highway, or portion of it, in their respective jurisdictions, for trails over which to drive livestock.
  3. Any person driving livestock over a regular public highway in violation of rules or regulations prohibiting the use of the highway, or portion of it shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2313, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Failure to Designate Trailing Routes.
Livestock Control Ordinance.

Sheep owner was not prohibited from having its sheep on the highway where the board of county commissioners had not designated any highways as trailing routes; nor had it passed any regulations barring the trailing of livestock on any highways. Etcheverry Sheep Co. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 113 Idaho 15, 740 P.2d 57 (1987). Livestock Control Ordinance.

Ordinance did not contravene a former similar section regarding driving of livestock where nothing in the language of the ordinance prohibited cattle drives since it proscribed allowing livestock to run “at large” and, under the terms of the ordinance, livestock were not “at large” if they were under the “immediate effective control” of their “custodian.” Benewah County Cattlemen’s Ass’n v. Board of County Comm’rs, 105 Idaho 209, 668 P.2d 85 (1983).

§ 40-2314. Passageways for stock.

Passageways for stock passing beneath any highway must be bridged with suitable plank not less than eighteen (18) feet in length, and it shall be lawful for the fences of either side to converge to the bridge over the passageway. The passageway must be kept securely bridged and in good repair by the person who owns the adjoining lands. The bridge shall not be placed more than one (1) foot above the level of the passageway. Approaches to the bridge over the passageway shall be kept in good repair by the owner.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2314, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2315. Damage to highways or ditches by livestock.

  1. Any person owning livestock or an employee or agent of the owner of livestock, who shall drive, range or graze the livestock along or across the public highways or ditches, or who shall permit them to range or graze along or across public highways or ditches, and thereby obstruct or partially obstruct the highway, by rolling rocks, brush or other debris on it, or destroy or injure any grades, ditches, bridges or approaches to bridges, shall immediately repair the damage done to the highway or ditch at their own expense. Any person owning livestock who shall refuse or neglect to repair any and all damage done to highways or ditches, within twenty-four (24) hours, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
  2. All commissioners, directors of highways, highway district commissioners, and the board and their deputies, are directed to supervise the enforcement of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2315, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

§ 40-2316. Private highways — Establishment.

Private highways may be opened for the convenience of one or more residents of any county highway system or highway district in the same manner as public highways are opened, whenever the appropriate commissioners may order the highway to be opened. The person for whose benefit the highway is required shall pay any damages awarded to landowners, and keep the private highway in repair.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2316, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Cited

MacCaskill v. Ebbert, 112 Idaho 1115, 739 P.2d 414 (Ct. App. 1987).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Constitutionality.

Law providing for establishment of private roads was not subject to constitutional objection of attempting to take private property for private use, as it authorized private road, when opened, to be used for any purpose to which it was adapted by the general public and by any individual thereof. Latah County v. Peterson, 3 Idaho 398, 29 P. 1089 (1892).

Easements.

In suit to establish both a public and private roadway, after abandonment of claim of existence of public highway, evidence of use of old log road or “tote” was held insufficient to establish an easement of necessity. Carbon v. Moon, 68 Idaho 385, 195 P.2d 351 (1948).

Signatures Required.

One signature was sufficient to authorize board of county commissioners to take steps to open private or byroad. Latah County v. Hasfurther, 12 Idaho 797, 88 P. 433 (1907).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-2317. Removal of fences.

When the alteration of an old or the opening of a new highway makes it necessary to remove fences on land given, purchased or condemned by order of a court for highway purposes, notice to remove the fences shall be given by the director of highways to the owner, his occupant, or agent, or by posting the notice on the fence. If removal is not accomplished within ten (10) days, or commenced and prosecuted as speedily as possible, the director of highways may cause it to be carefully removed at the expense of the owner, and recover from him the cost of removal. The fence material may be sold to satisfy the judgment.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2317, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2318. Turning highways across private lands.

If any person, through whose land any public highway is established, is desirous of turning the highway through any other part of his land, that person may, by petition, apply to the appropriate commissioners to permit him to turn the highway through another part of his land without materially increasing the distance of travel to the public. Upon receipt of a petition, accompanied by a sufficient bond to pay the cost and expense to be incurred, the appropriate commissioners may appoint three (3) disinterested viewers and a surveyor, if they deem it necessary, who shall view the ground over which the highway is proposed to be turned, and ascertain the distance the highway will be increased by the proposed alteration, and report in writing stating the several distances found, together with their opinion as to the usefulness of making the alterations. If the viewers report to the respective commissioners that the prayer of the petitioner is reasonable, the respective commissioners upon receiving satisfactory evidence that the proposed new highway has been opened a legal width, and in all respects made equal to the old highway for the convenience of travelers, may declare the new highway a public highway, make record of it, and at the same time vacate so much of the old highway as is embraced in the new. The person petitioning for the alteration shall pay all costs and expense of the view and survey, if ordered. When any person wishes to change the line or location of any public highway, he shall cause notice of his intention to apply to the appropriate commissioners having jurisdiction of the highway at its next session for permission to change the highway at his own expense, the notice to be in accordance with the provisions of section 40-206, Idaho Code, and shall also cause a copy of the notice to be posted at the post office, and at three (3) other public places in the county or district, at least twenty (20) days before the meeting of the respective commissioners. The notice must clearly show the proposed change or changes, and when, where, and by whom the petition will be presented, and at the time and place designated in the notice he must present his petition, which must conform to the notice. Any person objecting to the change may, within ten (10) days, file a protest in writing against it. Any person aggrieved by the action of the respective commissioners may appeal to the district court of the county in the same manner and with like effect as in other cases of appeal from the action of the respective commissioners.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2318, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2319. Encroachments — Removal — Notice — Penalty for failure to remove — Removal by county or highway district — Abatement.

  1. If any highway or public right-of-way under the jurisdiction of a county or highway district is encroached upon by gates, fences, buildings, or otherwise, the appropriate county or highway district may require the encroachment to be removed.
  2. If the county or highway district has actual notice of an encroachment that is of a nature as to effectually obstruct and prevent the use of an open highway for vehicles or is unsafe for pedestrian or motorist use of an open highway, the county or highway district shall immediately cause the encroachment to be removed without notice.
  3. If the county or highway district elects to remove an encroachment as provided for in subsection (1) of this section, notice shall be given to the occupant or owner of the land, or person causing or owning the encroachment, or left at his place of residence if he resides in the highway jurisdiction. If not, it shall be posted on the encroachment, specifying the place and extent of the encroachment, and requiring him to remove the encroachment within ten (10) days.
    1. If the encroachment is not removed, or commenced to be removed, prior to the expiration of ten (10) days from the service or posting the notice, the person who caused, owns or controls the encroachment shall forfeit up to one hundred fifty dollars ($150) for each day the encroachment continues unremoved;
    2. If the owner, occupant, or person controlling the encroachment, refuses either to remove it or to permit its removal, the county or highway district shall commence in the proper court an action to abate the encroachment. If the county or highway district recovers judgment, it may, in addition to having the encroachment abated, recover up to one hundred fifty dollars ($150) for every day the encroachment remained after notice, as well as costs of the legal action and removal; or
    3. If the owner, occupant or person controlling the encroachment fails to respond to the notice within five (5) days after the notice is complete, the county or highway district may remove it at the expense of the owner, occupant, or person controlling the encroachment, and the county or highway district may recover costs and expenses, as well as the sum of up to one hundred fifty dollars ($150) for each day the encroachment remained after notice was complete.
  4. The duties referenced in the provisions of this section, whether statutory or common law, require reasonable care only and shall not be construed to impose strict liability or to otherwise enlarge the liability of the county or highway district. The county or highway district, while responsible for their own acts or omissions, shall not be liable for any injury or damage caused by or arising from the encroachment or the failure to remove or abate the encroachment as provided for in subsection (1) of this section. The provision of this section shall not be construed to impair any defense that the county or highway district may assert in a civil action.
  5. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, abrogate or supersede the provisions of this title governing the power, authority or jurisdiction of a county or highway district, including the authority to regulate the use of highways or public rights-of-way for pedestrian and motorist safety.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2319, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586; am. 2000, ch. 252, § 2, p. 716; am. 2011, ch. 282, § 1, p. 765; am. 2013, ch. 264, § 1, p. 649.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 282, substituted “an open highway” for “the highway or public right of way” in the second sentence of subsection (1) and added subsection (6).

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 264, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 4 of S.L. 2000, ch. 252 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Action by Private Person.

Private person can bring such action only if he can show special injury. Stricker v. Hillis, 15 Idaho 709, 99 P. 831 (1909).

Damages.

Plaintiff, in action to recover special damages caused by obstruction of public street, had to allege and prove that he had sustained damages of a different kind from those sustained by the public. Stufflebeam v. Montgomery, 3 Idaho 20, 26 P. 125 (1891).

Declaration of Public Road.

If a county chooses to remove a gate blocking access to a road across a landowner’s property, a “Declaration of Public Road” under this section is a prerequisite. Evers v. County of Custer, 745 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1984).

Obstructions.
Pleading.

Where an oral dedication of land for road purposes has been accepted, in part, by the public by use, the public takes an easement over the land for the full width agreed upon by the dedication and accepted by the public and no obstructions placed in said road would work a forfeiture of the easement however long they might be suffered to remain there. Thiessen v. Lewiston, 26 Idaho 505, 144 P. 548 (1914). Pleading.

In action to remove obstruction from highway established by user, it is not necessary to allege title to highway by adverse possession. Meservey v. Gulliford, 14 Idaho 133, 93 P. 780 (1908).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.
C.J.S.

§ 40-2320. Gates

Penalties. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2320, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586, was repealed by S.L. 2000, ch. 252, § 3, effective April 12, 2000.

§ 40-2321. Bridges and culverts.

Any person intending to run water across any public highway must first, under the direction and with the approval of the directors of highways of the county or district, or if the highway be the boundary of two (2) counties or districts, then, under the direction and with the approval of the director of highways of both counties or districts, construct a ditch of sufficient size to carry all the water, and must build a substantial bridge, with easy grades on and off the bridge over the ditch not less than sixteen (16) feet wide. When the quantity of water of any ditch is such that a pipe or culvert will carry the water, the water may be conducted across the highway by means of a pipe or culvert, which must be adapted to the surface of the highway, and the highest point of which shall be at least two (2) feet beneath the surface of the highway, be built of a length not less than sixteen (16) feet, and in a substantial manner permitting uninterrupted travel. All such bridges or culverts shall be of concrete, and all pipes of concrete, steel or other mineral substance. No wooden bridges, pipes or culverts shall be constructed, unless it appears to the satisfaction of the respective commissioners that the cost of the bridge, pipe or culvert would be unreasonably increased by being made of concrete, steel or other mineral substance, and that there is not sufficient travel over the highway to make it necessary for the protection and convenience of public travel that the bridge, pipe or culvert be constructed of those materials. The respective commissioners may in their discretion and by resolution, permit the bridge, pipe or culvert to be constructed of wood or other material, but no bridge, pipe or culvert shall be constructed of wood or any materials other than those specified in this section except upon a resolution of the appropriate commissioners setting forth the reasons and particularly specifying the place of the construction. When a bridge, pipe or culvert shall have been constructed as required, and accepted and approved by the director of highways, it shall become county property and be maintained as other county bridges.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2321, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Restoration of Highway.

When a person constructs a ditch or canal across public highway, he is bound to restore or unite the highway at his own expense by some reasonably safe and convenient means of passage, and to keep the same in good repair. Lewiston v. Booth, 3 Idaho 692, 34 P. 809 (1893).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

§ 40-2322. Construction or repair of bridges and culverts by director of highways.

If any person owning or having ditches across any public highway, fails or neglects to build bridges or culverts over them as required, or to keep them, or the public highway in good repair, it is the duty of the director of highways of the county or district to build or repair them at the expense of that person, and the cost of them is a lien upon the land and premises of the ditch owner, and may be sued for and collected, by and in the name of the director of highways, in any court of competent jurisdiction.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2322, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2323. Abatement of flooding of highways — Right of entry — Court action for abatement.

  1. If the owner or occupant of land lying adjacent to or near any highway laid out or constructed, or any other person, shall maintain or cause to be maintained, or allow any dam, dike, or levee across any swale, hollow, or natural water drain or channel, either inside or outside any fence or other enclosure which may enclose the land, and shall thereby cause water to back upon, overflow or accumulate upon the highway, the director of highways of the county or district, or other official having direct supervision of the maintenance of the highway, or any other agent appointed by the respective commissioners, may go upon the premises and at the expense of the county or district install culverts and drains as may be necessary, and in a manner as to cause water to drain from the highway to be carried down its natural channel to some point where it may be disposed of without damage to the highway and adjoining landowners.
  2. Whenever it is necessary or convenient to do so, in carrying out the provisions of subsection (1) above, the respective commissioners who have by law the general supervision and control of the highway, are empowered to go upon and work upon the lands and premises where the dams, dikes and levees are situated.
  3. If it is denied that the dam, dike or levee causes water to back up, overflow or accumulate on the highway, or if the owner or occupant of the land, or person causing the dam, dike or levee to be maintained, refuses either to install suitable culverts or drains or does not allow the director of highways or other official having immediate supervision of the maintenance of the highway to do so, then the officer shall report the facts to the appropriate commissioners and they shall commence an action in the proper court to procure culverts or drains to be installed or the dam, dike, or levee abated as a nuisance. If the respective commissioners recover judgment, they may, in addition to having culverts installed or the dam, dike or levee abated as a nuisance, recover fifty dollars ($50.00) for every day the culverts remained uninstalled after the date of rendition of judgment in the action, and may also recover the costs of the action, and in an appropriate action, may also recover the cost and expenses of the installation of culverts or drains and the costs of suit.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2323, as added by 1985, ch. 253, § 2, p. 586.

§ 40-2324. Authorization and compensation for maintenance of public highways.

Whenever any nongovernmental entity desires to maintain all or part of a public highway or public right-of-way and desires to receive compensation for such maintenance [the entity] may petition the appropriate public highway agency for approval. The highway agency shall consider said petition and after reviewing the pertinent facts regarding the request, may approve or disapprove the request. If the highway agency approves the request of the nongovernmental entity, the highway agency shall pass a resolution which should outline the details and conditions for said authorization. Provided however, the granting of the compensation to that nongovernmental entity shall not exceed the dollar amount of the highway and bridge ad valorem tax levy that was assessed against the property of that nongovernmental entity under the provisions of section 40-801, Idaho Code, for the previous fiscal year. Authorization and compensation granted under this section shall not accumulate from year to year, but must be applied for each calendar year.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2324, as added by 1994, ch. 319, § 1, p. 1020.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in the first sentence was added by the compiler to supply probable missing words.

Chapter 24 LOCAL HIGHWAY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COUNCIL

Sec.

§ 40-2401. Local highway technical assistance council.

  1. A local highway technical assistance council is hereby created. The council shall be a public agency, and is the instrumentality of its member jurisdictions. The council and its officers and employees shall not be subject to the administrative or management control of the Idaho transportation department.
  2. The council shall consist of nine (9) members, three (3) each to be appointed by the association of Idaho cities, Idaho association of counties, and the Idaho association of highway districts. Council members shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority.
  3. Members of the council may be entitled to compensation for services at a rate not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) per day as determined by the members’ respective associations and actual and necessary expenses. Payment of an honorarium as provided in this subsection shall not be considered salary as defined in section 59-1302(31), Idaho Code. Compensation and reimbursement shall be made from the local highway technical assistance council accounts established in section 40-717, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2401, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 5, p. 867; am. 1995, ch. 268, § 2, p. 866; am. 2003, ch. 241, § 1, p. 623.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 40-2401 to 40-2403, which comprised 1917, ch. 35, §§ 1to 3, p. 80; reen. C.L. 63:11g to 63:11i; C.S., §§ 1584 to 1586; I.C.A.,§§ 39-2301 to 39-2303; am. 1945, ch. 88, §§ 1 to 3, p. 135; I.C.,§ 40-2401A, as added by 1966 (2nd E.S.), ch. 10, § 1, p. 27; 1974, ch. 12, §§ 45, 46, p. 61, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Compiler’s Notes.

Websites for organizations referenced in subsection (2):

association of Idaho cities — http://www.idahocities.org/

Idaho association of counties — http://www.idcounties.org/

Idaho association of highway districts — http://www.iahd.com .

§ 40-2402. Council organization — Personnel.

  1. The offices of the council shall be maintained in Ada county, and the members shall meet and organize as soon as all appointments have been made, or as provided in section 40-2401, Idaho Code. At the initial meeting, and each year thereafter, the members shall, by a majority vote of the total membership, elect a chairman and a vice chairman.
  2. The council shall meet quarterly for regular business sessions, and at such other times at the call of the chairman, or at the request of any three (3) members.
  3. The council may appoint a local highway administrator and fix his compensation, and the administrator shall hold office at the pleasure of the council. The administrator shall serve as secretary and executive officer of the council and carry out such duties as are delegated by the council. The council may employ other personnel, prescribe duties, and fix compensation.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2402, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 5, p. 867; am. 2001, ch. 183, § 14, p. 613.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2402 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2401.

§ 40-2403. Authority of the council.

The council shall have the authority to:

  1. Represent its member jurisdictions in conferences, meetings and hearings related to highways, roads and streets and other transportation factors affecting local highway jurisdictions;
  2. Develop uniform standards and procedures that may be recommended to its member jurisdictions for the construction, maintenance, use, operation and administration of local highways;
  3. Cooperate with and receive and expend aid and donations from the federal or state governments, and from other sources for the administration and operation of the council;
  4. Make recommendations to the Idaho transportation board for the distribution and prioritization of federal funds for local highway projects;
  5. Assist the legislature by providing research and data relating to transportation matters affecting local highway jurisdictions within the state;
  6. Maintain and disseminate information to local highway jurisdictions of federal and state legislation and administrative rules and regulations affecting local highway jurisdictions;
  7. Maintain and disseminate information to local highway jurisdictions of activities relating to ground transportation in other states;
  8. When authorized by the participating local jurisdiction, to act for that local jurisdiction through a joint exercise of powers agreement with any other local jurisdiction, and any agency of the state of Idaho, or any agency of the federal government;
  9. Buy, sell, receive and exchange property, both real and personal, as necessary to perform its functions;
  10. Be the sole and exclusive authority for the expenditure of the moneys made available by appropriation or otherwise to the council.
History.

I.C.,§ 40-2403, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 5, p. 867.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho transportation board,§ 40-301 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2403 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 40-2401.

§ 40-2404. Council fiscal year — Annual report.

The fiscal year for the local highway technical assistance council shall be July 1 through June 30. On an annual basis, the council shall issue a report outlining its activities for the previous year, including a financial statement. Copies of the report shall be provided to the members of the transportation committees of the legislature.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2404, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 5, p. 867.

§ 40-2405. Fiscal audits.

The council shall perform fiscal audits in accordance with the provisions of section 67-450B, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 40-2405, as added by 1994, ch. 280, § 5, p. 867.

Chapter 25 STATE HIGHWAY CONTRACTORS LICENSE TAX

Sec.

§ 40-2501 — 40-2507. License tax levied on contractors — Credit on income tax — Effect of nonpayment — Violations of act — Enforcement. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1937, ch. 221, §§ 1 to 8, p. 395, were repealed by S.L. 1949, ch. 182, § 1.

Chapter 26 IDAHO TURNPIKE CONTROL

Sec.

§ 40-2601 — 40-2622. Turnpike projects — Turnpike control established — Powers — Bonds — Trust agreement and funds — Tolls — Expenses. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1955, ch. 256, §§ 1 to 20, 22, 23, p. 569; am. 1970, ch. 133, § 4, p. 309; 1971, ch. 136, § 27, p. 522, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Chapter 27 COUNTY LOCAL OPTION SECONDARY HIGHWAY REORGANIZATION ACT

Sec.

§ 40-2701 — 40-2706. Regulation of secondary highways — Policy — Organization of county highway districts. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 290, §§ 1 to 6, p. 757; am. 1971, ch. 45, § 1, p. 98; 1979, ch. 321, §§ 1, 2, p. 860; 1985, ch. 151, §§ 1, 2, p. 401, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-2707. Issuance of bonds prohibited. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 7, p. 757, was repealed by S.L. 1969, ch. 71, § 2.

§ 40-2708. Adjustment of district borders — Notice — Hearing — Decision

Appeal. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 8, p. 757, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-2709. Authority and procedure for tax levies. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2709, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 9, p. 757, was repealed by S.L. 1965, ch. 144, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2709, as added by 1965, ch. 144, § 1, p. 280; am. 1967, ch. 71, § 1, p. 165; 1969, ch. 231, § 1, p. 738; 1978, ch. 183, § 1, p. 414, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-2710 — 40-2730. Apportionment of funds — Local option elections — Annexation of territory — Dissolution of districts. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1963, ch. 290, §§ 10 to 27, 30, 31 and 34, p. 757; am. 1971, ch. 113, § 1, p. 388; 1980, ch. 286, § 1, p. 755; 1985, ch. 151, § 3, p. 401, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

§ 40-2731 — 40-2733. Decennial county elections for new type of highway administration — Highway study commission — Meetings. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised S.L. 1970, ch. 181, §§ 1 to 3, p. 528, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985.

Chapter 28 BEAUTIFICATION OF STATE HIGHWAYS

Sec.

§ 40-2801, 40-2802. Authority of board — Acquisition of land. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1966 (2nd E.S.), ch. 5, §§ 1, 2, p. 16; am. 1974, ch. 12, §§ 47, 48, p. 61, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2803 — 40-2809. [Reserved.]

Tourist related advertising devices. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2810, as added by 1977, ch. 210, § 1, p. 576, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2811 — 40-2829. Advertising near highways — Application of act — Licenses — Fees — General prohibitions. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1967, ch. 396, §§ 1 to 19, p. 1168; am. 1972, ch. 355, §§ 1 to 6, p. 1052; 1974, ch. 12, §§ 49, 50, p. 61; 1975, ch. 139, §§ 1 to 4, p. 312; 1977, ch. 210, § 2, p. 576; 1978, ch. 48, § 1, p. 90; 1978, ch. 49, § 1, p. 92, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2830. Removal of displays. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2830, which comprised S.L. 1967, ch. 296, § 20, p. 1168; am. 1969, ch. 222, § 1, p. 728; 1972, ch. 355, § 7, p. 1052, was repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 139, § 5.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2830, as added by 1975, ch. 139, § 6, p. 312, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2831 — 40-2836. Compensation for removal — Information centers — Local ordinances — Nuisances — Enforcement. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1967, ch. 396, §§ 21 to 26, p. 1168; am. 1972, ch. 355, § 8, p. 1052; 1974, ch. 12, § 51, p. 61; 1975, ch. 139, § 7, p. 312, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2837. Penalty. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 40-2837, which comprised S.L. 1967, ch. 396, § 27, p. 1168, was repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 139, § 8.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 40-2837, as added by 1975, ch. 139, § 9, p. 312, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2838. Remedies cumulative. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised 1967, ch. 396, § 28, p. 1168, was repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2839 — 40-2850. [Reserved.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1967, ch. 141, §§ 1 to 10, p. 320; am. 1974, ch. 12, §§ 52 to 60, p. 61, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1901 et seq.

§ 40-2810. Legislative policy

§ 40-2851 — 40-2860. Junkyards as public nuisances — Licenses — Fees — Violations — Rules and regulations. [Repealed.]

Chapter 29 HIGHWAY RELOCATION ASSISTANCE

Sec.

§ 40-2901 — 40-2913. Relocation aid and assistance for persons displaced by public programs. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1969, ch. 298, §§ 1 to 12, 14, p. 891; am. 1971, ch. 114, §§ 1 to 7, p. 389; 1972, ch. 154, §§ 1 to 10, p. 333; I.C.,§ 40-2906A, as added by 1978, ch. 313, § 1, p. 806, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-2001 et seq.

Chapter 30 COUNTY WIDE HIGHWAY DISTRICTS

Sec.

§ 40-3001 — 40-3016. Election to establish district — Appointment of commissioners — Powers and duties — Funding — Dissolution. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised 1971, ch. 273, §§ 1 to 16, p. 1081; am. 1972, ch. 26, §§ 1 to 5, p. 32; 1972, ch. 277, §§ 1, 2, p. 682; I.C.,§ 40-3012A, as added by 1972, ch. 277, § 3, p. 682; 1973, ch. 101, § 1, p. 171; 1973, ch. 256, § 1, p. 507; 1973, ch. 317, § 1, p. 678; 1979, ch. 252, § 1, p. 659; 1982, ch. 254, § 9, p. 646; 1983, ch. 158, §§ 5, 6, p. 436; 1984, ch. 198, § 1, p. 488, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1401 et seq.

§ 40-3017 — 40-3020. Creation of local improvement districts — Organization of board. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

These sections, which comprised I.C.,§§ 40-3017 to 40-3020, as added by 1972, ch. 26, §§ 6 to 9, p. 32; am. 1973, ch. 317, § 2, p. 678; 1983, ch. 88, § 1, p. 183, were repealed by S.L. 1985, ch. 253, § 1, effective July 1, 1985. For present comparable provisions, see§ 40-1401 et seq.