Article 1. General Provisions.

§ 53C-1-1. Title.

This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as Regulation of Banks and Other Financial Services.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-1-2. Scope and applicability of Chapter.

  1. Unless the context specifies otherwise, this Chapter shall apply to the following:
    1. All existing banks organized or created under the laws of this State.
    2. All banks created under the provisions of Article 3 of this Chapter.
    3. All persons who subject themselves to the provisions of this Chapter.
    4. All persons who become subject to the penalties provided for in this Chapter as a consequence of violating any of the provisions of this Chapter.
  2. Transactions validly entered into before October 1, 2012, and the rights, duties, and interests flowing from them remain valid and may be terminated, completed, or enforced as required or permitted by any statute amended or repealed by the law by which this act was enacted as though the amendment or repeal had not occurred.
  3. Except as restricted by federal law, a federally chartered depository institution that has a branch in this State shall have all the rights, powers, and privileges and shall be entitled to the same exemptions and immunities as banks organized or created under the laws of this State.
  4. Except as restricted by federal law or the laws of another state in which it was organized or created, an out-of-state bank that has a branch in this State shall have, with respect to activities conducted through such branch, all the rights, powers, and privileges and shall be entitled to the same exemptions and immunities as banks organized and created under the laws of this State.
  5. Any reference in this Chapter to a state or federal law, regulation, or agency shall be deemed to refer to any replacement law or regulation or any successor agency, whether or not this Chapter explicitly provides for that reference.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-1-3. Existing banks; prohibitions, injunctions.

  1. No depository institution organized or created under the laws of this State may operate as a bank except in accordance with this Chapter. Banks established prior to October 1, 2012, may continue operation under their existing organizational documents but shall be subject to all other requirements of this Chapter.
  2. No person shall operate in this State as a “bank,” “savings bank,” “savings and loan association,” “trust company,” or otherwise as a depository institution or trust institution unless established as a depository institution or trust institution under the laws of this State or another state or established under federal law. Unless so authorized, no person doing business in this State shall do either of the following:
    1. Use in its name the term “bank,” “savings and loan,” “savings bank,” “banking company,” “trust company,” or words of similar meaning that lead the public reasonably to believe that it conducts the business of a depository institution or trust institution.
    2. Use any sign, letterhead, circular, or Web site content or advertise or communicate in any manner that would lead the public reasonably to believe that it conducts the business of a depository institution or trust institution.
  3. Upon application by the Commissioner, a court of competent jurisdiction may issue an injunction to restrain any person from violating or from continuing to violate this section.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-1-4. Definitions and application of terms.

Unless the context requires otherwise, the following definitions apply in this Chapter:

  1. Acquire. — To obtain the right or power to vote or to direct the voting of voting securities of a bank or holding company as follows:
    1. Through a purchase of or share exchange for shares.
    2. By reason of an issuance of shares or the exercise of a right under a warrant, option, or convertible security or instrument to acquire shares.
    3. Pursuant to an agreement or trust or through any similar transaction, event, or contractual right.
  2. Acting in concert. — Knowing participation in a joint activity or interdependent conscious parallel action toward the common goal of obtaining control of a bank or holding company, whether or not pursuant to an express agreement, including participation in a combination or pooling of voting securities of a bank holding company for such common purpose pursuant to any contract, understanding, relationship, agreement, or other arrangement, whether written or otherwise.
  3. Affiliate. — A person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person. Each member of a group of persons acting in concert shall be deemed an affiliate of the group.
  4. Bank. — Any corporation, other than a credit union, savings institution, or trust company, that is organized under the laws of this State and is engaged in the business of receiving deposits (other than trust funds), paying monies, and making loans.
  5. Bank operating subsidiary. — A subsidiary that is under the control of a bank and engages only in activities in which a bank may engage pursuant to G.S. 53C-5-1 .
  6. Bank premises. — Any improved or unimproved real estate, whether or not open to the public, that is utilized or intended to be utilized by a bank, including additional space to rent as a source of income.
  7. Bank supervisory agency. — Any of the following agencies:
    1. The CFPB, FDIC, Federal Reserve Board, OCC, and any successor to these agencies.
    2. Any agency of another state with primary responsibility for chartering and supervising depository institutions organized under the laws of that state.
    3. Any agency of a sovereign nation with primary responsibility for chartering and supervising depository institutions organized under the laws of that nation.
  8. Bankers’ bank. — As defined in Regulation D of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 C.F.R. § 204.121.
  9. Banking laws. — All laws which the Commissioner or the OCOB is authorized to enforce under any applicable statute.
  10. Board of directors. — A governing board of a company that is responsible for policy, oversight, and compliance.
  11. Branch. — An office of any bank or a depository institution organized under the banking laws of the United States, another state, or another sovereign nation, other than that depository institution’s principal office, in which deposits are received. A branch may also engage in any of the functions or services authorized to be engaged in by the bank of which it is a branch. The term “branch” does not include a non-branch bank business office, automated teller machine, remote deposit facility, remote service unit, customer-bank communications terminal, point-of-sale terminal, automated banking facility or other direct or remote information processing device or machine, whether manned or unmanned, by means of which information relating to any financial service or transaction rendered to the public is stored and transmitted, instantaneously or otherwise, to or from a bank or other nonbank terminal.
  12. Capital. — An amount equal to the bank’s “total capital” as that term is used by the FDIC in 12 C.F.R. Part 325; provided, that if the term “total capital” is replaced by a term including substantially the same elements as “total capital,” the term “capital” as used in this Chapter shall mean an amount equal to the amount calculated by application of the definition of such replacement term.
  13. Capital impairment. — The reduction of a bank’s capital at any time below its required capital.
  14. Central reserve bank. — A depository institution of which at least fifty percent (50%) of its shares are owned by other depository institutions.
  15. CFPB. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or its successor.
  16. Charter. — A document issued by the Commissioner in accordance with Article 3 of this Chapter permitting a bank to conduct banking business.
  17. Combination. — A merger, share exchange, or transfer or acquisition of all or substantially all assets and liabilities of a person undertaken in compliance with such federal laws and laws of this State or other states as may be applicable.
  18. Commission. — The State Banking Commission provided for in G.S. 53C-2-1 .
  19. Commissioner. — The Commissioner of Banks provided for in G.S. 53C-2-2 .
  20. Company. — A corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, business trust, trust, syndicate, association, unincorporated organization, or other form of business entity. (20a) Consumer finance licensee. — An individual associated with a “licensee,” as that term is defined in G.S. 53-165(h) .
  21. Control. — The possession, directly or indirectly, of the power or right to direct or to cause the direction of the management or policies of a person by reason of an agreement, understanding, proxy, or power of attorney or through the ownership of or voting power over ten percent (10%) or more of any class of the voting securities of the person.
  22. Control transaction. — The acquisition of control over a bank or a holding company other than pursuant to a combination.
  23. Credit union. — A credit union as defined in G.S. 54-109.1 .
  24. De novo branch. — A branch of a bank or of an out-of-state bank within this State that is established as a branch, and not (i) by virtue of an acquisition of the existing branch of another bank or out-of-state bank, (ii) by a combination involving the bank or out-of-state bank, or (iii) by the conversion of a non-branch bank business office to a branch.
  25. Deposit. — A “deposit” as defined in Section 3(l) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1813(l).
  26. Deposit insurance. — Insurance of a bank’s deposit accounts where the beneficiaries are the holders of the insured accounts.
  27. Depository institution. — A bank, out-of-state bank, savings institution, or federally chartered institution, the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC.
  28. Deputy commissioner. — An individual appointed by the Commissioner to such office as provided by G.S. 53C-2-3 .
  29. Distribution. — With respect to a bank, “distribution” has the same meaning as set forth in Chapter 55.
  30. DPC subsidiary. — A debt previously contracted subsidiary of a bank that acquires in good faith an equity ownership interest through foreclosure or other realization on collateral, by way of a compromise of a disputed or contested claim, or to avoid a loss in connection with a debt previously contracted or to which the bank transfers an equity ownership interest so acquired by the bank.
  31. Equity ownership interest. — Any beneficial equity or similar interest, whether direct or indirect, including shares, limited or general partnership interests, and membership interests in a limited liability company.
  32. Examination. — A supervisory inspection of a bank, a proposed bank, a holding company, or a branch of an out-of-state bank operating in this State that may include inspection of all relevant information, including information of or about the subsidiaries and affiliates of the bank, proposed bank holding company, or branch. “Examination” also includes an investigation of any person with respect to any violation or suspected violation of any provision of this Chapter by such person, or a review of facts and circumstances relevant to the Commissioner’s consideration of the issuance of an order pursuant to this Chapter.
  33. Farm credit system institution. — A lending institution regulated by the Farm Credit Administration.
  34. FDIC. — The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor.
  35. Federal Reserve Board. — The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or its successor.
  36. Federal savings association. — A federal savings association or federal savings bank chartered under Section 5 of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1464.
  37. Federally chartered institution. — A national bank or federal savings association.
  38. Financial subsidiary. — A “financial subsidiary” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 24a(g).
  39. Holding company. — A company that controls a depository institution or that controls a company that directly or indirectly controls a depository institution.
  40. Immediate family. — An individual’s spouse, father, mother, children, brothers, sisters, and grandchildren; the father, mother, brothers and sisters of the individual’s spouse; and the spouse of the individual’s child, brother, or sister.
  41. Inadequate capital. — An amount of capital equal to at least seventy-five percent (75%) but less than one hundred percent (100%) of required capital.
  42. Individual. — A human being.
  43. Insufficient capital. — An amount of capital less than seventy-five percent (75%) of required capital.
  44. Lower-tier subsidiary. — Any company which is controlled by a subsidiary.
  45. National bank. — A banking association organized under 12 U.S.C. § 21.
  46. Non-branch bank business office. — Any staffed physical location open to the public, at which any of the following institutions offers one or more banking or banking-related products or services, but does not take deposits:
    1. Bank.
    2. Out-of-state bank.
    3. Depository institution established under the laws of another state.
    4. Federally chartered institution.
    5. Separately organized subsidiary of a bank, out-of-state bank, depository institution established under the laws of another state, or federally chartered institution.
    6. Holding company of a bank, out-of-state bank, depository institution established under the laws of another state, or federally chartered institution.

      The provision of remote deposit capture facilities or services by a non-branch bank business office does not constitute a taking of deposits. Non-branch bank business offices include loan production offices, mortgage loan offices, and insurance agency offices, or a combination thereof.

  47. North Carolina financial institution. — A bank, savings institution, or trust company organized under the laws of this State. For purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any North Carolina financial institution is a banking institution.
  48. OCC. — The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or its successor.
  49. OCOB. — The Office of the Commissioner of Banks as provided in G.S. 53C-2-3 .
  50. Organizational documents. — The charter, certificate of organization, articles of incorporation, articles of association, certificate of limited partnership, bylaws, operating agreement, partnership agreement, and any other similar documents required to be prepared or adopted by a company in connection with its organization, and as thereafter amended from time to time.
  51. Organizational law. — The laws of the jurisdiction of organization of a company applicable to the organization of the company and its governance, including approval of transactions by its board of directors, shareholders, partners, members, or beneficiaries, as applicable.
  52. Organizers. — One or more individuals who are the organizers of a proposed bank responsible for the business of the proposed bank from the filing of the application to the Commission’s final decision on the application.
  53. Out-of-state bank. — A bank that is organized, chartered, or created under the laws of a state other than this State and the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC.
  54. Person. — An individual, a company, or a group of persons who are acting in concert.
  55. Plan of conversion. — A detailed outline of the procedure of the conversion of a depository institution from one to another charter.
  56. Practical banker. — An individual who at the time of appointment to the Commission is, or has been during the five years preceding the appointment, a president, chief executive officer, director, or holder of five percent (5%) or more of any class of voting securities of a North Carolina financial institution.
  57. Principal office. — The office that houses the headquarters of a bank.
  58. Public member. — A member of the Commission who is not a practical banker or a consumer finance licensee and who is not at the time of appointment to the Commission, nor was within the five years preceding the appointment, an employee of a North Carolina financial institution.
  59. Public notice. — Notice to the public of the applicable information specified in this Chapter by (i) a single publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the bank that is the subject of the publication has its principal office or in such other county as may be directed by the Commissioner to best meet the purposes for which the notice is required and (ii) a posting in the notices section of the Commissioner’s Web site for at least 15 days.
  60. Record. — Information, reports, memoranda, charts, letters, messages, extracts, summaries, analyses, compilations, transaction documentation, account statements, financial statements, and other documents, including customer financial and other information, whether created, transmitted, distributed, retained, or stored in tangible or digital form.
  61. Registered agent. — The person named in the organizational documents of a company upon whom service of legal process is deemed binding upon the company.
  62. Required capital. — Required capital means either of the following:
    1. In the case of a proposed bank, the amount of capital required by the Commissioner as a prerequisite to the commencement of the business of banking.
    2. In all other cases, an amount of capital equal to at least the amount of capital required for a bank to be deemed “adequately capitalized” under applicable federal regulatory capital standards.
  63. Savings institution. — A savings and loan association or a savings bank organized under the laws of this State or of another state, or a federal savings association or savings bank.
  64. Shareholder. — Any person in whose name shares are registered in the records of a corporation, or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of the rights granted by a nominee certificate on file with a corporation.
  65. Shares. — The units into which the equity ownership interests of a corporation are divided.
  66. State. — Any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any territory of the United States other than this State.
  67. State trust company. — A company organized under the provisions of Article 24 of Chapter 53 of the General Statutes and a trust company previously organized under other provisions of this Chapter to operate only as a trust company and not as a commercial bank.
  68. Subsidiary. — A company over which a bank has control, including a lower-tier subsidiary.
  69. This State. — The State of North Carolina.
  70. Trust business. — Acting as a fiduciary or in other capacities permissible for a trust institution under G.S. 53-331 .
  71. Trust company. — A trust institution that is neither a depository institution nor a foreign bank, as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(s)(1), but not including a bank organized under the laws of a territory of the United States.
  72. Trust funds. — Trust funds as defined in Section 3(p) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1813(p).
  73. Trust institution. — Any company lawfully acting as a fiduciary in a state or in a foreign country.
  74. Voting securities. — A security that (i) confers upon the holder the right to vote for the election of members of the board of directors or similar governing body of the company or (ii) is convertible into, or entitles the holder to receive upon its exercise, a security that confers such a right to vote.
  75. Well-capitalized. — The term “well-capitalized” has the same meaning as defined in Regulation Y of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 C.F.R. § 225.2(r).
  76. Well-managed. — Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, a company or depository institution is well-managed if the following apply:
    1. At its most recent examination, the company or institution received at least a satisfactory composite rating and at least a satisfactory rating for management, if such rating is given.
    2. In the case of a company or depository institution that has not received an inspection or examination rating, a company or depository institution is well-managed if the Commissioner has determined, after a review of the managerial and other resources of the company or depository institution and after consulting with any other appropriate bank supervisory agency for the company or institution, that the company or institution is well-managed.

      A depository institution that results from the merger of two or more depository institutions that are well-managed shall be considered to be well-managed unless the Commissioner determines otherwise after consulting with any other appropriate bank supervisory agency for each depository institution involved in the merger. A depository institution that results from the merger of a depository institution that is well-managed with one or more depository institutions that are not well-managed or have not been examined shall be considered to be well-managed if the Commissioner determines, after a review of the managerial and other resources of the resulting depository institution and after consulting with any other appropriate bank supervisory agency for the institutions involved in the merger, as applicable, that the resulting institution is well-managed.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 1; 2017-165, ss. 1, 2.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 1, effective April 16, 2013, substituted “company” for “institution” in subdivision (4); inserted subdivision (20a); inserted “any class of” near the end of subdivision (21); substituted “company which is controlled by a subsidiary” for “bank operating subsidiary in which a bank subsidiary has an equity ownership interest” in subdivision (44); inserted “or a consumer finance licensee” near the beginning of subdivision (58); and added “, including a lower-tier subsidiary” at the end of subdivision (68).

Session Laws 2017-165, ss. 1 and 2, effective July 21, 2017, in subdivision (25), substituted “Section 3( l )” for “Section 3(1)” and substituted “12 U.S.C. § 1813( l )” for “12 U.S.C. § 1813(1)”; and rewrote subdivision (46).

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Dynamic Federalism and Consumer Financial Protection: How the Dodd-Frank Act Changes the Preemption Debate,” see 89 N.C.L. Rev. 1273 (2011).

§ 53C-1-5. Severability.

If any provision of this Chapter is found by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid as to any person or circumstance, or to be preempted by federal law, the remaining provisions of this Chapter shall not be affected and shall continue to apply to any other person or circumstance.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Article 2. Commission and Commissioner.

§ 53C-2-1. The Commission.

  1. The Commission consists of 15 members, including the State Treasurer, who shall serve as an ex officio member; 12 members appointed by the Governor; and two members appointed by the General Assembly under G.S. 120-121 , one of whom shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and one of whom shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Governor shall appoint to the Commission three practical bankers, one consumer finance licensee, one member who is, or is employed by a person that is, licensed under Article 19B of Chapter 53 of the General Statutes, and seven public members. The member appointed upon the recommendation of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate shall be a practical banker, and the member appointed upon the recommendation of the Speaker of the House shall be a practical banker. Members shall serve terms of four years. No individual shall serve more than two complete consecutive terms on the Commission. Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Commission shall be filled by the appropriate appointing officer for the unexpired term, except that vacancies among members appointed by the General Assembly shall be filled in accordance with G.S. 120-122 . The appointed members of the Commission shall receive subsistence and travel expenses at the rates set forth in G.S. 120-3.1 . This compensation shall be paid from the revenues of the OCOB.
  2. The Commission shall meet at such times, but not less than once every three months, as the Commission may by resolution prescribe, and the Commission shall be convened in special session at the call of the Governor or the Commissioner. The State Treasurer shall be chair of the Commission. The Commission shall meet in person, provided that it may, so long as consistent with applicable law regarding public meetings, meet by telephone or video conference, including attendance of one or more members by telephone or video conferencing.
  3. Except as required by State or federal law, no member of the Commission shall divulge or make use of any information designated by this Chapter or by the Commissioner as confidential, and no member shall give out any such information unless the information shall be required of the member at a hearing at which the member is duly subpoenaed or by a court of competent jurisdiction.
  4. A quorum of the Commission shall consist of a majority of its total membership. Subject to the standards of Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, a majority vote of the members qualified with respect to a matter who are present at the meeting where such matter is considered shall constitute valid action of the Commission. In accordance with G.S. 138A-38(a)(6), the State Treasurer and all disqualified members who are present at a meeting shall be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
  5. The Commission is authorized to supervise, direct, and review the exercise by the Commissioner of all powers, duties, and functions vested in or exercised by the Commissioner under the banking laws of this State.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 2; 2017-6, s. 3; 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b), 6.1; 2019-173, s. 3(a).

Re-recodification; Technical and Conforming Changes.

Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, provides, in part: “The Revisor of Statues shall recodify Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, Chapter 120C of the General Statutes, as well as Chapter 163 of the General Statutes, as amended by this act, into a new Chapter 163A of the General Statues to be entitled ‘Elections and Ethics Enforcement Act,’ as enacted by Section 4 of this act. The Revisor may also recodify into the new Chapter 163A of the General Statutes other existing statutory laws relating to elections and ethics enforcement that are located elsewhere in the General Statutes as the Revisor deems appropriate.” The Revisor was further authorized to make additional technical and conforming changes to catchlines, internal citations, and other references throughout the General Statutes to effectuate this recodification. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor of Statutes substituted “Articles 5, 6, 7, and 9 of Chapter 163A” for “Chapter 138A” and substituted “163A-218(a)(6)” for “138A-38(a)(6)” in subsection (d).

Session Laws 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b), and 6.1, repealed Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, and authorized the Revisor of Statutes to re-recodify Chapter 163A into Chapters 163, 138A, and 120C and to revert the changes made by the Revisor pursuant to Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor of Statutes reverted the changes to references in subsection (d).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2001-193, s. 15, provides: “All (i) statutory authority, powers, duties, and functions, including rule making, budgeting, and purchasing, (ii) records, (iii) personnel, personnel positions, and salaries, (iv) property, and (v) unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations, reserves, support costs, and other funds of the Savings Institutions Division of the Department of Commerce are transferred to and vested in the Office of Commissioner of Banks authorized by Article 8 of Chapter 53 of the General Statutes. Though transferred to the Office of Commissioner of Banks pursuant to this section, the Savings Institutions Division shall continue to function under that name. All statutory authority, powers, duties, and functions of the Administrator of the Savings Institutions Division are transferred to and vested in the Commissioner of Banks. This transfer has all the elements of a Type I transfer, as defined in G.S. 143A-6 .”

Session Laws 2012-56, s. 52(a), provides: “G.S. 53C-2-1, as enacted by Section 4 of this act, becomes effective April 1, 2013. In order to reduce the number of members of the State Banking Commission from 22 to 15 as required by G.S. 53C-2-1 , the terms of the following members appointed by the Governor shall be terminated:

“Dalip Awasthi (public member)

“G. Rick Edwards (public member)

“Scott Falmlen (public member)

“Robert ‘Robbie’ O. Hill (public member)

“Mary Clara Capel (practical banker)

“Larry R. Chavis (practical banker)

“Harold T. Keen (Savings

Institution CEO)

“The terms of the remaining members shall expire under the current schedule, and the Governor shall make appointments to fill vacancies as they occur, provided that the Governor shall fill one of the practical banker vacancies with a consumer finance licensee.”

Session Laws 2012-56, s. 52(b), provides: “Effective April 1, 2013, the General Assembly shall review the appointment to the State Banking Commission made upon the recommendation of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to determine whether the appointee meets the qualifications for the appointment and shall adjust the appointment accordingly.”

Session Laws 2019-173, s. 3(b), made the amendments to subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2019-173, s. 3(a), effective March 31, 2021, and provides, in part: “The Governor shall make an appointment as required by this section to replace one of the current public members whose term expires on that day.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 2, effective April 16, 2013, substituted “G.S. 138A-38(a)(6)” for “G.S. 138A-38” in the third sentence of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2019-173, s. 3(a), inserted “to the Commission” following “The Governor shall appoint” and substituted “one member who is, or is employed by a person that is, licensed under Article 19B of Chapter 53 of the General Statutes, and seven public members” for “and eight public members to the Commission” in the second sentence of subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases below were decided under former G.S. 53-92 .

G.S. 53-4 and this section are construed in pari materia. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Finality of Commission Actions. —

Had the Banking Commission been created as a purely administrative agency it might fairly be contended that the finality of its actions would be in an administrative sense only and appropriate legal proceedings could be had to test them. But the former Corporation Commission had judicial powers in dealing with banks. Its stock assessments were, for example, given the effect of superior court judgments. Corporation Comm'n v. Murphey, 197 N.C. 42 , 147 S.E. 667, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 142 (1929), aff'd, 280 U.S. 534, 50 S. Ct. 161, 74 L. Ed. 598, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 784 (1930). See also Corporation Comm'n v. Bank of Vanceboro, 200 N.C. 422 , 157 S.E. 59, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 347 (1931).

Compliance with Notice of Appeal Requirements. —

Dismissal of a finance company’s appeal from a decision of the North Carolina State Bank Commission was reversed because the company complied with the requirements under G.S. 53-92(d) for appeals from the Commission by submitting a notice of appeal to the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks within 20 days of the Commission’s order. In re Advance Am., Cash Advance Ctrs. of N.C. Inc., 189 N.C. App. 115, 657 S.E.2d 405, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 426 (2008).

§ 53C-2-2. The Commissioner.

  1. Effective April 1, 2011, and quadrennially thereafter, the Governor shall appoint a Commissioner, which appointment shall be subject to confirmation by the General Assembly by joint resolution. The name of the individual appointed to be Commissioner shall be submitted to the General Assembly on or before February 1 of the year in which the individual’s term of office begins. The term of office for the Commissioner shall be four years. In case of a vacancy in the office of Commissioner, the Governor shall appoint an individual to serve as Commissioner on an interim basis pending confirmation of a nominee by the General Assembly.
  2. The Commissioner has the powers enumerated in this Chapter and otherwise provided by North Carolina law and such other powers as may be necessary for the proper discharge of the Commissioner’s duties, including the power to enter into contracts. The Commissioner shall act as the executive officer of the Commission.
  3. The Commissioner is authorized to subpoena witnesses and compel their attendance, require the production of evidence, administer oaths, and examine any person under oath in connection with any subject related to any power vested or duty imposed on the Commissioner under this Chapter.
  4. The Commissioner may sue and prosecute or defend in any action or proceeding in any courts of this State or any other state and in any court of the United States for the enforcement or protection of any right or pursuit of any remedy necessary or proper in connection with the subjects committed to the Commissioner for administration or in connection with any bank or the rights, liabilities, property, or assets thereof under the Commissioner’s supervision. Nothing herein shall be construed to render the Commissioner liable to be sued except as other departments and agencies of the State may be liable under the general law. The Commissioner may exercise any jurisdiction, supervise, regulate, examine, or enforce any banking law and any State consumer protection laws or federal laws with respect to which the Commissioner has enforcement jurisdiction.
  5. The Commissioner shall have a seal of office bearing the legend “State of North Carolina — Commissioner of Banks.” The Commissioner may adopt other symbols or marks of office.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 3.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 3, effective April 16, 2013, inserted “banking law and any” in the last sentence of subsection (d).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 8 (G.S. 53-92 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Source of Power to Liquidate Insolvent Banks. —

The Commissioner of Banks, when engaged in the liquidation of the assets of an insolvent bank, as authorized by statute, does not derive his power or his authority from the court. His power and authority, both to take possession of an insolvent bank, and to liquidate its assets for distribution among its creditors according to their respective rights, are derived from the statute. In re Central Bank & Trust Co., 206 N.C. 251 , 173 S.E. 340, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 154 (1934).

§ 53C-2-3. The Office of the Commissioner of Banks.

  1. The Commissioner shall be assisted in the performance of the duties of office by (i) one or more deputy commissioners and (ii) examiners, investigators, counsel, and other employees under the supervision of the Commissioner, all of whom, together with the Commissioner, shall comprise the “Office of the Commissioner of Banks.” In addition, the work of the OCOB may be conducted by employees of other agencies of government and by agents and independent contractors of the OCOB. The Commissioner may appoint or remove at his or her discretion any deputy commissioner.
  2. The Commissioner shall appoint, with the approval of the Governor, and may remove at the Commissioner’s discretion, a chief deputy commissioner. The chief deputy commissioner may perform such duties and exercise such powers of the Commissioner as the Commissioner may direct. In the event of the absence, death, resignation, disability, or disqualification of the Commissioner, or in case the office of Commissioner otherwise becomes vacant, the chief deputy commissioner shall perform the duties and exercise all the powers vested in the Commissioner until the Governor appoints an acting Commissioner.
  3. Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the OCOB and its employees are exempt from the classification and compensation rules established by the State Human Resources Commission pursuant to G.S. 126-4(1) through (4); G.S. 126-4(5) only as it applies to hours and days of work, vacation, and sick leave; G.S. 126-4(6) only as it applies to promotion and transfer; G.S. 126-4(10) only as it applies to the prohibition of the establishment of incentive pay programs; and Article 2 of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes, except for G.S. 126-7.1 . The salary of the Commissioner shall be fixed by the General Assembly.
  4. The Attorney General shall assign an attorney from the Department of Justice to work full time with the Commission. The attorney shall be subject to all provisions of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes relating to the State Human Resources system. The Commission shall fully reimburse the Department of Justice for the compensation, secretarial support, equipment, supplies, records, and other property to support the attorney.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-382, s. 9.1(c); 2014-115, s. 55.4(c).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.1(c), effective August 21, 2013, substituted “State Human Resources Commission” for “State Personnel Commission” in the first sentence of subsection (c).

Session Laws 2014-115, s. 55.4(c), effective August 8, 2014, substituted “State Human Resources system” for “State Personnel System” in subsection (d).

§ 53C-2-4. Administration of the Office of the Commissioner of Banks.

  1. As authorized in Chapters 54B, 54C, and this Chapter, the OCOB shall be funded by annual or periodic assessments, licensing fees and charges, and reimbursements for examination costs. This list is not exclusive. The OCOB may not levy assessments, fees, or other charges except as expressly provided in this Chapter or by rule adopted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes and the provisions of this section. The Commissioner is authorized, in the exercise of reasonable discretion, to establish the time, place, and method for the payment of assessments, fees, charges, and costs.
  2. Not less than 30 days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the OCOB shall prepare and submit to the Commission a budget for the upcoming fiscal year, including the estimated revenues and expenses for the year. The Commission shall review the budget in a meeting prior to the commencement of the fiscal year with respect to which the budget has been presented and shall approve or modify the budget at the meeting.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-2-5. Rule making.

  1. The Commissioner, subject to review and approval by the Commission, may make all necessary rules with respect to the establishment, operation, conduct, and termination of any and all activities and businesses that are subject to licensing, regulation, supervision, or examination by the Commissioner under this Chapter.
  2. The rule-making authority conferred on the Commissioner by this section shall be in addition to and not in derogation of any specific rule-making authority by any other provision of this Chapter or otherwise provided by North Carolina law.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-2-6. Hearings and appeals.

  1. Any administrative hearing required or permitted to be held by the Commissioner shall be conducted in accordance with Article 3A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
  2. Upon an appeal to the Commission by any party from an order entered by the Commissioner following an administrative hearing pursuant to Article 3A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes, the chair of the Commission may appoint an appellate review panel of not fewer than three members to review the record on appeal, hear oral arguments, and make a recommended decision to the Commission. Unless another time period for appeals is provided by this Chapter, any party to an order by the Commissioner may, within 20 days after the order and upon written notice to the Commissioner, appeal the Commissioner’s order to the Commission for review. The notice of appeal shall state the grounds for the appeal and set forth in numbered order the assignments of error for review by the Commission. Failure to state the grounds for the appeal and assignments of error shall constitute grounds to dismiss the appeal. Failure to comply with the briefing schedule provided by the Commission shall also constitute grounds to dismiss the appeal. Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Commissioner shall, within 30 days of the notice, certify to the Commission the record on appeal. Any party to a proceeding before the Commission may, within 20 days after final order of the Commission, petition the Superior Court of Wake County for judicial review of a final determination of any question of law that may be involved. The petition for judicial review shall be entitled “(insert name) Petitioner v. State of North Carolina on Relation of the Commission.” A copy of the petition for judicial review shall be served upon the Commissioner pursuant to G.S. 150B-46 . The petition shall be placed on the civil issue docket of the court and shall have precedence over other civil actions. Within 15 days of service of the petition for judicial review, the Commissioner shall certify the record to the Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County. The standard of review of a petition for judicial review of a final order of the Commission shall be as provided in G.S. 150B-51(b).
  3. The hearing officer at administrative hearings conducted under the authority of the Commissioner may be the Commissioner, a deputy commissioner, or other suitable person designated by the Commissioner to serve as a hearing officer.
  4. The Commission may conduct public hearings on matters within its purview.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-2-7. Official record.

  1. The Commissioner shall keep a record in the OCOB of the Commissioner’s official acts, rulings, and transactions that, except as otherwise provided, shall be open to inspection and copying by any person. The Commissioner may condition the provision of copies of records upon the payment by the person requesting the documents of an amount sufficient to cover the cost of retrieving, copying, and if requested, mailing the documents.
  2. Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, the following records in the custody of the OCOB are confidential and shall not be disclosed or be subject to discovery or public inspection:
    1. Records compiled during or in connection with an examination, audit, or investigation of any person, including records relating to any application for licensure or otherwise to the conduct of business. The OCOB may treat as confidential any response to an application.
    2. Records containing information compiled in preparation for or anticipation of or in the course of litigation, examination, audit, or investigation or containing information that was privileged prior to being obtained by the Commissioner.
    3. Records containing personal information about a person, whether in paper, electronic, or other form, that is maintained by or on behalf of the financial institution; provided, however, that every report made by a North Carolina financial institution, with respect to a transaction between it and an officer, director, or affiliate thereof, which report is required to be filed with the Commissioner pursuant to this Chapter, shall be filed with the Commissioner in a form prescribed by the Commissioner and shall be open to inspection and copying by any person.
    4. Records containing information furnished in connection with an application bearing on the character, competency, or experience, or information about the personal finances of an existing or proposed organizer, officer, director, or employee of a depository institution, federally chartered institution, trust institution, holding company, or any other person subject to the Commissioner’s jurisdiction.
    5. Records containing information about the character, competency, experience, or finances of the directors, officers, or other persons having control over a person giving notice or filing an application to engage in a control transaction pursuant to this Chapter.
    6. Records containing information about the character, competency, or experience of the directors, executive officers, or other persons having control over any of the parties to a combination subject to the Commissioner’s jurisdiction.
    7. Records of North Carolina financial institutions in dissolution that have liquidated, that are under the Commissioner’s supervisory control, or that are in receivership and that contain the names or other personal information of any person.
    8. Minutes or other records that have been obtained by the Commissioner and that are related to meetings of, or have been prepared by, any of the following bodies of a North Carolina financial institution:
      1. The board of directors.
      2. A compliance review committee of the board of directors.
      3. Any other committee of the board of directors.
      4. A committee established at the direction of the board of directors.
      5. A committee established at the direction of a committee of the board of directors.
    9. Records prepared during or as a result of an examination or investigation of any person by an agency of the United States, or jointly by the agency and the Commissioner, if the records would be confidential under federal law or regulation.
    10. Records prepared during or as a result of an examination or investigation of any person by a regulatory agency with jurisdiction of a state other than this State or of a foreign country if the records would be confidential under that jurisdiction’s law or regulations.
    11. Records of information and reports submitted to federal regulatory agencies by any depository institution or trust institution, or its affiliates, holding company or its subsidiaries, or any other person subject to the Commissioner’s jurisdiction, if the records would be confidential under federal law or regulation.
    12. Records of complaints from the public received by the OCOB.

      (12a) Records that are confidential under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes or protected from disclosure under other applicable law.

    13. Any record that would disclose any information set forth in any of the confidential records referred to in this subsection.
  3. For purposes of this section, “any person subject to the Commissioner’s jurisdiction” includes any person who is licensed or registered or should be licensed or registered under this Chapter.
  4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, the Commissioner may, by written agreement with any state or federal law enforcement or regulatory agency, share with that agency any confidential record set out in subsection (b) of this section or any information contained therein, on the condition that such record or information shared shall be treated as confidential under the applicable laws and regulations governing the recipient agency.
  5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section which limit discovery of confidential records held by the Commissioner, such records may be produced for discovery in a criminal or enforcement proceeding if both of the following occur:
    1. After reviewing the discovery request, the court orders the Commissioner to submit the confidential records to the court for in camera review and the court finds that the interests of justice require that the documents be discoverable or admissible in evidence.
    2. After making the finding provided by subdivision (1) of this subsection, the court enters a protective order restricting access and public distribution or any republication of the confidential materials requested.
  6. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a bank, upon approval of the Commissioner, from disclosing to an insurance carrier, for the purpose of obtaining insurance coverage required by this Chapter, the bank’s regulatory rating prepared by the OCOB; provided, however, that the insurance carrier must agree in writing to maintain the confidentiality of the information and not to disclose it in any manner whatsoever.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2017-165, s. 3.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 3, effective July 21, 2017, substituted “in the custody of the OCOB are” for “of the Commissioner shall be” in the introductory language of subsection (b); added the second sentence in subdivision (b)(1); added “or containing information that was privileged prior to being obtained by the Commissioner.” at the end of subdivision (b)(2); substituted “personal information about a person,” for “nonpublic personal information about a customer,” in subdivision (b)(3); substituted “director, or employee” for “or director” in subdivision (b)(4); substituted “person” for “customers of the institutions” in subdivision (b)(7); rewrote subdivision (b)(8), which read: “Records prepared by a compliance review committee or other committee of the board of directors of a North Carolina financial institution or established at the direction of such a board of directors that have been obtained by the Commissioner.”; and added subdivision (b)(12a).

Article 3. Organization of a Bank.

§ 53C-3-1. Application to organize a bank.

  1. An applicant for permission to organize a bank and for a charter must file an application with the Commissioner. The application shall be in the form required by the Commissioner and shall contain such information as the Commissioner requires, set forth in sufficient detail to enable the Commissioner to evaluate the applicant’s satisfaction of the criteria set forth in G.S. 53C-3-4 . The applicant shall pay a nonrefundable application fee as provided by rule at the time of filing the application.
  2. Upon receipt of an application, the Commissioner shall conduct an examination of the applicant and any other matters deemed relevant by the Commissioner. The Commissioner may require additional information and may require the amendment of the application in the course of the examination. An applicant’s failure to furnish all required information or to pay the required fee within 30 days after filing the application may be considered an abandonment of the application.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Banking corporation is wholly a creature of statute, doing business by legislative grace, and the right to carry on a banking business through the agency of a corporation is a franchise which is dependent on a grant of corporate powers by the State. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960) (decided under prior law) .

§ 53C-3-2. Permission to organize a bank.

  1. With the approval of the Commissioner, the organizers may file articles of incorporation for the proposed bank with the Secretary of State. The Commissioner shall authorize the organization of the proposed bank if the Commissioner is satisfied that each of the following conditions is met:
    1. The application is complete.
    2. The Commissioner’s examination as provided for in G.S. 53C-3-1 indicates that the requirements for the issuance of a charter to the applicant are reasonably probable of satisfaction.
    3. The proposed name of the proposed bank is not likely to mislead the public as to its character or purpose and is not the same as a name already adopted by an existing depository institution or trust institution operating in this State.
  2. If the Commissioner approves the organization of the proposed bank, the Commissioner shall issue a certificate to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State shall transmit to the Commissioner a certified copy of the filed articles of incorporation of the proposed bank.
  3. Unless and until the Commissioner issues a charter to the proposed bank:
    1. The proposed bank shall not transact any business except such as is incidental and necessary to its organization or the application for a charter or preparation for commencing the business of banking.
    2. All funds paid for shares of the proposed bank shall be placed in escrow under a written escrow with a third-party escrow agent satisfactory to the Commissioner.
    3. All funds for shares placed into escrow, and all dividends or interest on such funds, may be removed from escrow only with the Commissioner’s approval except to the extent that such funds are refunded to subscribers or as otherwise required by law.
  4. A proposed bank is subject to the jurisdiction of the Commissioner.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-3-3. Articles of incorporation of a proposed bank.

  1. The articles of incorporation of a proposed bank shall be signed and acknowledged by or on behalf of an organizer and shall contain the following:
    1. The information required to be set forth in articles of incorporation under Chapter 55 of the General Statutes.
    2. Any provision consistent with Chapter 55 of the General Statutes and other applicable law that the organizers elect to set forth for the regulation of the internal affairs of the proposed bank and that the Commissioner authorizes or requires.
    3. Any provision the Commissioner requires or authorizes as a substitute for a provision that otherwise would be required by Chapter 55 of the General Statutes.
  2. Before the chartering of a proposed bank, the articles of incorporation filed under the provisions of G.S. 53C-3-2 shall be sufficient certification to the FDIC that the proposed bank is a legal entity.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-3-4. Commissioner’s approval of charter issuance.

  1. The Commissioner may approve a charter for a proposed bank only when the Commissioner has determined that all the following requirements have been satisfied or are reasonably probable to be satisfied within a reasonable period of time specified by the Commissioner in the order of approval:
    1. The proposed bank has solicited or will solicit subscriptions for purchases of shares sufficient to provide an amount of required capital satisfactory to the Commissioner for the commencement of the business of banking.
    2. All prior public solicitations for purchases of shares and all future solicitations will be solicited with appropriate disclosure, taking into account all the circumstances of the public solicitation, including a prominent statement in any solicitation document to the effect that the solicitation has not been approved by the Commissioner or the Commission and that a representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
    3. All payments for purchases of shares in a bank in organization are made in United States currency.
    4. The proposed bank has an operational expense fund from which to pay organizational expenses, in an amount determined by the Commissioner to be sufficient for the safe and sound operation of the proposed bank while the charter application is pending.
    5. The proposed bank has been formed for legitimate and lawful business purposes.
    6. The character, competence, and experience of the organizers, proposed directors, proposed officers, and initial holders of more than ten percent (10%) of the voting securities of the proposed bank will command the confidence of the public.
    7. The proposed officers and directors, as a group, have degrees of character, competence, and experience sufficient to justify a belief that the proposed bank will be free from improper or unlawful influence and otherwise will operate safely, soundly, and in compliance with law.
    8. The anticipated volume and nature of business of the proposed bank projected in the application are reasonable and indicate a reasonable probability of safe, sound, and profitable operation of the proposed bank.
    9. If the proposed bank intends to conduct “trust business,” as defined by G.S. 53C-1-4(70), it appears that trust powers should be granted based on consideration of the various factors set forth in Article 24 of Chapter 53 of the General Statutes for considering applications and setting capital for a State trust company.
  2. The Commissioner’s determination that the requirements described in subsection (a) are reasonably probable of satisfaction may be based on partial satisfaction of the requirements at a level set by the Commissioner as a prerequisite for approval of the charter, and also may be based on presentation of a plan for the full satisfaction of the requirements.
  3. If it appears to the Commissioner that the proposed bank has satisfied or is reasonably probable to satisfy the requirements for issuance of a charter, the Commissioner shall issue an order approving the application for a charter and such order shall be submitted to the Commission for its review at a public hearing. The Commissioner may, in the order approving the proposed bank’s charter, impose other reasonable conditions or restrictions upon the proposed bank or the new bank, consistent with this Chapter.
  4. If it appears to the Commissioner that the proposed bank has not satisfied and is not reasonably probable of satisfying the requirements for issuance of a charter, the Commissioner shall issue an order denying approval of the application. The applicant may, within 10 days of issuance of the order, give notice of appeal of this decision to the Commission pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Suit upon Refusal to Issue Charter. —

Where plaintiffs applied for an industrial bank charter, and their application was not passed upon by the Secretary of State on the advice and recommendation of the Commissioner of Banks, acting in accordance with G.S. 53-4, and plaintiffs sued to compel the issuance of a charter, alleging no capricious acts, bad faith or disregard of law by the State officers, the complaint did not state a cause of action and was not sufficient as a petition for certiorari or as an application for mandamus. Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E.2d 896, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 88 (1942).

This section and G.S. 53-92 are construed in pari materia. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Scope of Duty and Discretion of Commissioner. —

The duty imposed upon and the discretion vested in the Commissioner of Banks under this section bears only upon the question whether certain conditions exist justifying the creation of the proposed bank under the terms and procedure laid down in the statute. His action and the certificate issued thereon merely constitute the prescribed procedure to determine whether the franchise applied for was grantable under the law. Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E.2d 896, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 88 (1942).

Basis for Refusal to Issue Certificate. —

If the certificate of incorporation complies with statutory requirements in all other respects, the authority of the Commissioner of Banks to refuse to issue such certificate to the Secretary of State must be based on a finding adverse to the proposed banking corporation in respect of one or more of the legislative standards defined in this section. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Review by State Banking Commission. —

Any decision made by the Commissioner of Banks in the exercise of the responsibility and authority conferred upon him by this section is subject to review by the State Banking Commission upon application by any adversely affected interested person. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Upon review of a decision of the Commissioner of Banks, the Commission has no authority to direct the Commissioner of Banks to refuse to issue a certificate of approval to a proposed banking corporation which is otherwise in compliance with statutory requirements, except on a finding adverse to the proposed banking corporation in respect of one or more of the legislative standards defined in this section. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Six-month limitation set out in the last sentence of this section applies only in the event the “said persons” have become “a body politic and corporate” and the certificate of incorporation has been recorded and issued. Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E.2d 758, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 392 (1960).

Only State May Take Advantage of Defect in Organization. —

A defect in the organization of a bank because of failure to begin business within the specified time can be taken advantage of only by a direct proceeding by the State for that purpose. Boyd v. Redd, 120 N.C. 335 , 27 S.E. 35, 1897 N.C. LEXIS 68 (1897).

§ 53C-3-5. Notice; public hearing.

  1. Not less than 30 days before the public hearing of the Commission to review the Commissioner’s approval of an application, the applicant shall cause to be published a public notice containing the following:
    1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
    2. The name of the community where the proposed bank intends to locate its principal office.
    3. A statement that a public hearing will be held to review the Commissioner’s approval of the application.
    4. A statement that any interested person may file a written statement either favoring or protesting the chartering of the proposed bank. The statement shall note that, in order to be considered at the public hearing, all written statements from interested persons must be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the date of publication of the public notice.
  2. At the public hearing, the Commission shall consider the findings and order of the Commissioner and shall hear such testimony as the Commissioner may wish to give or be called upon to give. To the extent that the Commission deems the information and testimony relevant to its review of the Commissioner’s order, the Commission shall receive information and hear testimony from the organizers and shall hear from any other interested persons.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-3-6. Commission decision.

  1. The Commission shall consider the findings and order of the Commissioner, oral testimony, and any other information and evidence, either written or oral, that comes before it at the public hearing to review the Commissioner’s approval of an application for a charter. The Commission may adjourn and reconvene the public hearing in unusual circumstances. The Commission shall affirm or reverse the Commissioner’s order. The Commission may adopt the Commissioner’s recommendation with respect to conditions for issuance of a charter, or it may modify the conditions recommended by the Commissioner. The Commission shall render its decision at the public hearing, unless unusual circumstances require postponement of the decision. The Commission’s review shall be limited to a determination of whether the criteria set forth in G.S. 53C-3-4 have been met and whether the provisions of this Article have been followed.
  2. If the Commission denies an application for a charter or if the Commission approves an application with conditions not set forth in the Commissioner’s approval, the applicant may appeal the denial or approval containing such conditions, as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-3-7. Issuance of charter.

  1. A proposed bank shall not engage in business except as allowed under G.S. 53C-3-2(c)(1), until it receives a charter issued by the Commissioner. The Commissioner shall not issue the charter until the Commissioner is satisfied that the proposed bank has done each of the following:
    1. Received payment in United States currency for the purchase of shares and will have satisfactory required capital upon commencing business, in each case in at least the amount required by the Commission’s order approving the application.
    2. Elected the proposed officers and directors named in the application or other officers and directors approved by the Commissioner.
    3. Secured deposit insurance from the FDIC.
    4. Complied with all requirements of the Commission’s order approving the application for a charter.
    5. Appears to be ready to commence the business of banking in the reasonable discretion of the Commissioner upon a pre-opening examination.
  2. The charter issued by the Commissioner shall set forth any trust powers of the bank that may be full or partial trust powers.
  3. If a bank does not open and engage in the business of banking within six months after the date its charter is issued or within such longer period as may be permitted by the Commissioner, the Commissioner shall revoke the charter.
  4. If the Commissioner determines that a charter should not be issued following Commission approval, the applicant may appeal that decision to the Commission as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .
  5. Following the exhaustion of all appeals, the Commissioner may dissolve and liquidate the proposed bank as provided in G.S. 53C-9-301 , or order the organizers to dissolve and liquidate the proposed bank pursuant to G.S. 53C-9-201 , if any one of the following occurs:
    1. The Commissioner does not recommend the issuance of a charter.
    2. The Commission denies approval of a charter.
    3. The charter is revoked by the Commissioner pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or other applicable law.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The case cited below was decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Capital Stock Required. —

This section expressly requires that domestic banks must have capital stock. Cooke v. Outland, 265 N.C. 601 , 144 S.E.2d 835, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1066 (1965).

Article 4. Governance of Banks.

§ 53C-4-1. Banks — Form of organization.

  1. A bank shall be formed as, and shall maintain the form of, a corporation formed under the laws of this State.
  2. The provisions contained in Chapter 55 of the General Statutes shall apply to banks, except where provisions of this Chapter provide differently or where the Commissioner determines that any provision of Chapter 55 is inconsistent with the business of banking or the safety and soundness of banks.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-2. Banks controlled by boards of directors.

  1. The corporate powers of a bank shall be exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the bank shall be managed by or under the direction of, its board of directors.
  2. A bank’s board of directors shall consist of not fewer than five individuals. For good cause shown, the Commissioner may approve boards of directors consisting of fewer than five individuals to the extent consistent with other applicable law.
  3. The board of directors shall meet at least quarterly, provided that the executive committee shall meet in any month in which there is no meeting of the board of directors, and the loan committee shall meet monthly.
  4. Except to the extent the provisions of this Chapter or other applicable federal or state laws and regulations impose a different standard, bank directors shall have the duties, authority, and liabilities of directors of corporations organized under Chapter 55 of the General Statutes.
  5. The board of directors of a bank may appoint directors with respect to such of the bank’s branches as it deems useful to the business of the bank. No such advisory director shall be liable for acts or omissions undertaken as an advisory director under the laws applicable to the performance of the duties of a director of a bank, unless and only to the extent he or she undertakes or is delegated authority as a director of the bank.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-3. Committees of boards of directors.

  1. The board of directors shall appoint, at a minimum, an audit committee, an executive committee, and a loan committee (which may be the executive committee or the board of directors as a whole) and may appoint such other committees as it deems appropriate to provide for the safe and sound operation of the bank in a manner consistent with applicable laws and regulations.
  2. The Commissioner may require the board of directors of a bank to establish one or more additional committees if, in the judgment of the Commissioner, such committees are reasonably necessary or appropriate for good corporate governance, for the safe and sound operation of the bank, or to ensure the bank’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In the exercise of his or her judgment under this subsection, the Commissioner may consider, among other factors, the asset size of the bank, the range and complexity of the activities in which the bank is engaged, the various risks undertaken by the bank, the experience and abilities of the bank’s directors and officers, and the adequacy of the bank’s existing policies, procedures, and internal controls.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-4. Minutes of meetings of directors and committees.

Minutes shall be recorded and retained for all meetings of the board of directors and board committees and kept on file at the bank. The minutes shall show a record of actions taken.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-5. Qualifications of bank directors.

  1. At least three-fourths of the directors of a bank shall be citizens of the United States of America.
  2. A director must satisfy eligibility requirements for bank directors imposed by federal law, including Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1829(a).
  3. Following a director’s election or appointment as a director, the director shall, solely for purposes of any action or proceeding that may thereafter be brought by the Commissioner, and on a form satisfactory to the Commissioner, do all of the following:
    1. Consent to the jurisdiction of the Commissioner and the General Court of Justice for the State of North Carolina in any such action or proceeding.
    2. Consent to venue in Wake County, North Carolina, in any such action or proceeding.
    3. Unless the director appoints an agent pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, appoint the Commissioner as the director’s agent for service of process in any such action or proceeding and authorize and instruct the Commissioner or the Commissioner’s duly appointed deputy or agent to accept service of process for the director in any such action or proceeding.
  4. When service of legal process in an action or proceeding brought by the Commissioner is made on a director by service and acceptance of service of process in the manner provided in subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section, the Commissioner shall, within three business days thereafter, give notice to the director of such service and acceptance of service of process by depositing a copy of the process served and accepted, together with any pleading, order, or other item accompanying the process, with a “designated delivery service” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 7502(f)(2) and directed to the director’s last known address in the Commissioner’s records. The Commissioner shall keep a record which shall show the day and hour of such acceptance of service of process, any pleading, order, or other item accompanying the process, and the date upon which the above notice was given. When service of process is made pursuant to subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section, the time within which the director may file a responsive pleading or similar response, as provided by Chapter 1A or Chapter 150B of the General Statutes, shall be extended by 12 days.
  5. The consent and appointment described in subsections (c) and (f) of this section shall be deemed irrevocable and shall not be affected by the termination of the director’s service as a director.
  6. In lieu of meeting the requirements of subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section, a director may appoint an agent for service of such process in Wake County, North Carolina.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 4.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 4, effective April 16, 2013, rewrote subsection (c) and added subsections (d) through (f).

§ 53C-4-6. Liability of directors.

  1. The standard of conduct for directors shall be as set forth in G.S. 55-8-30 .
  2. Any director of any bank who shall knowingly violate, or who shall knowingly permit to be violated by any officers, agents, or employees of the bank, any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be held personally and individually liable for all damages which the bank, its shareholders, or any other person shall have sustained in consequence of such violation. Any aggrieved shareholder of any bank in liquidation may prosecute an action for the enforcement of the provisions of this section. Only one such action may be brought.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 7 (G.S. 53-78 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Liability for False and Misleading Statement. —

A false and misleading statement made by the directors by which one was led to make deposits gave a cause of action against the directors. It was also held that the directors are presumed to know the condition of the bank. Townsend v. Williams, 117 N.C. 330 , 23 S.E. 461, 1895 N.C. LEXIS 66 (1895); Tate v. Bates, 118 N.C. 287 , 24 S.E. 482, 1896 N.C. LEXIS 49 (1896); Solomon v. Bates, 118 N.C. 311 , 24 S.E. 478, 1896 N.C. LEXIS 50 (1896); Houston v. Thornton, 122 N.C. 365 , 29 S.E. 827, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 264 (1898).

Who May Prosecute Action. —

An action for damages against the directors, for false statements as to the bank’s solvency made to private persons and in the bank’s report to the Commission, is solely maintainable by the receiver of the bank unless the private person can show an injury peculiar to him as distinguished from the loss among the creditors generally. Douglass v. Dawson, 190 N.C. 458 , 130 S.E. 195, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 101 (1925).

§ 53C-4-7. Directors may declare distributions.

Provided a bank does not make distributions that reduce its capital below its applicable required capital, the board of directors of a bank may declare such distributions as it deems proper.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-8. Officers and employees shall give bond.

  1. A bank shall require security in the form of a bond for the fidelity and faithful performance of duties by its officers and employees. The bond shall be issued by a bonding company authorized to do business in this State and upon such form as may be approved by the Commissioner. Otherwise, the amount, form, and terms of the bond shall be such as the board of directors may require. The premium for the bond is to be paid by the bank.
  2. To provide for the safety and soundness of a bank, the Commissioner may require an increase in the amount of the bond or additional or different security.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 7 (G.S. 53-78 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Section Enters into and Forms Part of Bond. —

The provision of this section requiring officers and employees of a bank to give bond in an amount required by the directors and upon such form as may be approved by the Commissioner of Banks, is the only statutory provision which becomes a part of the bond. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Hood, 226 N.C. 706 , 40 S.E.2d 198, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 317 (1946). See Hood v. Simpson, 206 N.C. 748 , 175 S.E. 193, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 306 (1934).

Effect of Renewal of Bond. —

When a bond, which guarantees the fidelity of a bank cashier and guarantees the bank against loss by reason of embezzlement, etc., of said cashier, is executed for an indefinite term and thereafter is kept in force by the payment of annual premiums, for each year the officer was reelected, then each and every renewal thereof is a separate and distinct bond or independent contract. Hood v. Simpson, 206 N.C. 748 , 175 S.E. 193, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 306 (1934).

Where a bond guaranteeing the payment of any loss sustained through the dishonesty of a bank official, while “in the continuous employment of a bank” after a specified date, is kept in force for a period of years by the payment of the stipulated annual premium, recovery on the bond is limited to the maximum liability, therein stipulated for losses, occurring during the life of the bond, and the contention that the surety is liable for defalcations to the amount of the penal sum of the bond for each of the years during which the bond is kept in force, is untenable. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Hood, 226 N.C. 706 , 40 S.E.2d 198, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 317 (1946) (distinguishing) Hood v. Simpson, 206 N.C. 748 , 175 S.E. 193, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 306 (1934).

Fidelity bond interpretation. —

Because, under an ambiguous termination clause couched in the present tense in a fidelity bond, as interpreted, coverage only terminated when the insured bank initially discovered, after the coverage period’s commencement, an employee’s dishonest conduct, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the bank on its claim arising out of the embezzlement of over $1,000,000 from an account of a customer of the bank by an assistant vice president, whom the bank knew had been previously convicted of embezzlement. Home Sav. Bank v. Colonial Am. Cas. & Sur. Co., 165 N.C. App. 189, 598 S.E.2d 265, 2004 N.C. App. LEXIS 1147 (2004).

§ 53C-4-9. Affiliate transactions.

A bank may extend credit to, and engage in transactions with, its affiliates, directors, executive officers, principal shareholders, and their respective immediate family members only to the extent permitted by, and subject to such restrictions and conditions as are imposed by, applicable State and federal laws and regulations.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-10. Examination of board composition, structure, and conduct.

  1. As part of its examinations of a bank, the OCOB may assess the competence, composition, structure, and conduct of such bank’s board of directors, including the following:
    1. The number of directors.
    2. The independence of directors.
    3. The committee structure of the board.
    4. The education and training of board members.
    5. Compliance with the bank’s code of ethics.
  2. In making the assessment authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the OCOB shall take into consideration publicly issued regulations and guidance of the Commissioner and the bank’s primary federal supervisor and may consider, among other factors, the asset size of the bank, the range and complexity of the activities in which the bank is engaged, the various risks undertaken by the bank, the experience and abilities of the bank’s directors and officers, and the adequacy of the bank’s existing policies, procedures, and internal controls.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-4-11. Reserve fund.

  1. Each bank shall maintain a reserve fund as follows:
    1. If the bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System, it shall maintain a reserve fund in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Reserve Board.
    2. All other banks shall maintain a reserve fund as required by the Commissioner.
  2. The Commissioner may require a level of reserve fund for nonmember banks as provided in subsection (a)(2) of this section, taking into consideration the level of liquidity the Commissioner deems necessary for the safe and sound operation of the banks.
  3. In establishing the required level of reserve fund, the Commissioner shall include the following types of liquid reserves:
    1. Cash on hand, which shall include both United States currency and exchange of any clearinghouse association or similar intermediary, and balances maintained at any federal reserve bank, either directly or on a pass-through basis, to meet federal reserve system reserve requirements.
    2. Balances payable on demand from designated depository institutions.
    3. Obligations of the United States Treasury, any agency of the United States government that is guaranteed by the United States government, and any general obligation of this State or any political subdivision thereof that has an investment grade rating of A or higher by a nationally recognized rating service.
  4. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, in the event the reserve fund of a bank falls below the level required under subsection (b) of this section, the Commissioner may require the bank to do the following:
    1. Discontinue making any new extension of credit.
    2. Promptly restore its reserve fund to the applicable required level.
  5. In the event a bank shall fail to promptly restore its reserve fund to the applicable level required within 10 days after the Commissioner directs it to do so, the Commissioner may take such actions under Article 8 of this Chapter as the Commissioner deems necessary.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 5.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 5, effective April 16, 2013, added “and balances maintained at any federal reserve bank, either directly or on a pass-through basis, to meet federal reserve system reserve requirements” at the end of subdivision (c)(1); and inserted “payable” at the beginning of subdivision (c)(2).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 8 (G.S. 53-92 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Purpose. —

The wisdom of this section and G.S. 53-48 [now repealed] is manifest; banks, whose business is conducted in strict compliance therewith seldom become insolvent. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Criminal Liability of Bank’s Officers. —

A bank must act through its officers, and where they have violated the provisions of this section and G.S. 53-48 [now repealed], as to lending the bank’s money, the offense is committed by the officers under the meaning of the statute, and they are individually indictable therefor. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Showing of Knowledge of Violation Is Sufficient for Conviction. —

Where the official position of an officer of a bank is such as necessarily to acquaint him of the violation of the statute respecting the making of loans, and to fix him as a party thereto, it is sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of the misdemeanor prescribed by G.S. 53-134 [now repealed]. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Intent Not Element of Offense. —

An intent to defraud the bank or others is not required to be either alleged in the indictment or proved upon the trial of the issue raised by a plea of not guilty. Neither the bank nor any of its officers or directors have any discretion as to the making of loans which are thus forbidden. Intent is, therefore, not an element of the crime. The willful doing of the unlawful act constitutes the crime declared by G.S. 53-134 [now repealed] to be a misdemeanor. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Consolidation of Indictments. —

An indictment charging a bank officer of violating this section and also unlawfully making loans in violation of G.S. 53-48 [now repealed] alleges the commission of crimes of the same class. Where there are two indictments thereof against the same person they may be consolidated and tried together by the court. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

§ 53C-4-12. Compliance review committee.

  1. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
    1. “Compliance review committee” means (i) a bank’s board of directors, (ii) a committee authorized by the bank’s board of directors, or (iii) any other committee or person to the extent the committee or person acts at the direction of or reports to the bank’s board of directors or a committee authorized by the bank’s board of directors when any part of the functions of the board, committee, or person is to audit, evaluate, report, or determine compliance with any of the following standards or requirements:
      1. Loan underwriting standards.
      2. Asset quality.
      3. Financial reporting to federal or State regulatory agencies.
      4. Adherence to the bank’s investment, lending, accounting, ethical, or risk assessment, and financial standards.
      5. Compliance with federal or State statutory or regulatory requirements.
      6. Cybersecurity requirements.
    2. “Compliance review documents” means documents prepared for or created by a compliance review committee.
    3. “Government agency” means a state or federal regulatory body that is not a bank supervisory agency that has jurisdiction over a bank’s compliance with state or federal laws or regulations, including those dealing with taxes, securities, or financial reporting.
    4. “Loan review committee” means a person or group of persons who, on behalf of a bank, reviews assets, including loans held by the bank, for the purpose of assessing the credit quality of the loans or the loan application process, compliance with the bank’s investment and loan policies, and compliance with applicable law and regulations.
  2. Banks shall maintain complete records of compliance review documents, and the documents shall be available for examination by the Commissioner or any bank supervisory agency or government agency having jurisdiction. Notwithstanding Chapter 132 of the General Statutes or any other provision of the General Statutes, compliance review documents in the custody of a bank, the Commissioner, a government agency, or a bank supervisory agency are confidential, are not open for public inspection, and are not discoverable or admissible in evidence in a civil action against a bank, its directors, officers, or employees, unless the court finds that the interests of justice require that the documents be discoverable or admissible in evidence.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2017-165, s. 4.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 4, effective July 21, 2017, rewrote subdivision (a)(1), which read: “ ‘Compliance review committee’ ” means an audit, loan review, or compliance committee appointed by the board of directors of a bank, or any other person to the extent the person acts at the direction of or reports to such a committee, whose functions are to audit, evaluate, report, or determine compliance with any of the following:”; inserted “or regulatory” in subdivision (a)(1)e.; added subdivision (a)(1)f.; and inserted “or any other provisions of the General Statutes,” following “General Statutes” near the beginning of the second sentence in subsection (b).

§ 53C-4-13. Immediate report of changes in directors and certain officers.

Each bank shall report to the Commissioner any changes in its (i) directors, (ii) president, (iii) chief executive officer, (iv) chief financial officer, (v) chief loan officer, or (vi) chief credit officer by the close of the second day on which the bank is open for business following such change.

History. 2013-29, s. 6.

Article 5. Powers of Banks.

§ 53C-5-1. Powers.

  1. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this Chapter, a bank shall have the powers conferred upon business corporations organized under the laws of this State. In addition, and not by way of limitation, a bank shall have the power to do the following:
    1. Carry on the business of banking, which includes such activities as discounting and negotiating promissory notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other evidences of indebtedness; receiving deposits; issuing, advising, and confirming letters of credit; receiving money for transmission; and loaning money on personal security or on real or personal property.
    2. Make any loan that could be made by a federally chartered institution doing business in this State.
    3. Purchase or invest in loans, or a participating interest in loans, of a type that the bank could itself make.
    4. Sell any loan, including one or more participating interests in a loan.
    5. Make any investments authorized by G.S. 53C-5-2 or any other section of this Chapter.
    6. Through information technology systems, processes, and capabilities, provide, deliver, or otherwise make available banking services and products, enhance the effectiveness or efficiency of its operations, and provide other benefits to its customers. Additionally, a bank may utilize its information technology systems, processes, capabilities, and capacities in the same manner and to the same extent as is permitted for national banks.
    7. Engage in any other activities approved by rule, order, or interpretation of the Commissioner.
  2. A bank shall also have the power to engage in any of the following activities:
    1. As principal in any activity permissible for a national bank under any law, including the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 24, as well as any activity recognized as permissible for a national bank in any regulation, order, or written interpretation issued by the OCC.
    2. As principal in any activity that is permissible or determined by the FDIC to be permissible for a bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1831a, or in any regulation, order, or written interpretation thereunder.
    3. As principal in any activity that is permissible for a savings institution organized under Chapters 54B or 54C of the General Statutes, or that is permissible for a federal savings association under the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933, 12 U.S.C. § 1464, or in any regulation, order, or written interpretation thereunder.
    4. In any activity other than as principal.
  3. In addition to the other powers described in this section, a bank shall have the power to exercise all other powers that are reasonably necessary or incident to the exercise of the powers authorized in subsections (a) and (b) of this section.
  4. Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, a bank that proposes to engage in any new activity shall apply to the Commissioner for approval to engage in the activity before its commencement. If the new activity will be conducted in a new or existing subsidiary in which the bank intends to make an investment, the bank shall apply to the Commissioner for approval to engage in the new activity before entering into the investment. The bank shall not engage in the new activity or make the investment unless and until the Commissioner issues a written approval of the application. An application for approval shall contain a description of the proposed activity and any other information required by the Commissioner. A copy of any notice or application the bank is required to file with any bank supervisory agency with respect to the proposed activity shall also be provided to the Commissioner. For the purpose of this section, a “new activity” is any business activity in which the bank is not currently engaged. The extension or relocation of an existing activity into a new department, division, or subsidiary of the bank shall not be considered a new activity. A bank may appeal a denial of an application by the Commissioner pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 .
  5. No application for approval to engage in a new activity shall be required, provided all of the following conditions are met as of the date the activity is commenced:
    1. The new activity is one described in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.
    2. The bank is well-capitalized and well-managed as demonstrated by the supervisory rating it received during its most recent safety and soundness examination.
    3. No notice or application to engage in the new activity is required to be filed by the bank with any federal banking regulator.
  6. A bank permitted to commence a new activity without prior application and approval pursuant to subsection (e) of this section shall notify the Commissioner in writing of the commencement of the new activity no later than the 30th day after the earlier of (i) commencing the new activity or (ii) if applicable, making an investment in a subsidiary through which the new activity will be conducted.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 7; 2017-165, s. 5.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 7, effective April 16, 2013, in subsection (d), inserted “new” following “engage in the” in the second and third sentences, and added the last sentence.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 5, effective July 21, 2017, added “in any of the following activities:” at the end of subsection (b) and, in subdivision (b)(4); deleted “permitted under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1831a.” following “principal” at the end and made a related punctuation change.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 6 (G.S. 53-43 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

State banks have no powers beyond those expressly granted, or those fairly incidental thereto, in this Article. Sparks v. Union Trust Co., 256 N.C. 478 , 124 S.E.2d 365, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 478 (1962).

Negotiations of Evidences of Debt. —

In the course of its dealings and for a lawful purpose, a bank may negotiate notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other evidences of indebtedness embraced by this section. Richmond County v. Page Trust Co., 195 N.C. 545 , 142 S.E. 786, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 142 (1928).

Power to Become Surety or Lend Credit. —

In the absence of an express grant of authority, a banking corporation, as a rule, does not have the power to become the guarantor or surety of the obligation of another person, or to lend its credit to any person. Indiana Quarries Co. v. Angier Bank & Trust Co., 190 N.C. 277 , 129 S.E. 619, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 61 (1925).

A bank is not authorized to become a guarantor, except where it is necessary to protect its rights where the guaranty relates to commercial paper and is an incident to the purchase and sale thereof, or when the guaranty is especially authorized by law. Indiana Quarries Co. v. Angier Bank & Trust Co., 190 N.C. 277 , 129 S.E. 619, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 61 (1925).

It is general banking practice to require that interest be paid in advance. Huski-Bilt, Inc. v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co., 271 N.C. 662 , 157 S.E.2d 352, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1261 (1967).

Nothing in common law prohibits an order requiring production of bank records as part of an investigation of criminal activities of the bank’s customers, and, if anything, the common law courts affirmatively possessed such power. By extension, then, the Superior Courts of North Carolina continue to possess such power where the interests of justice so require. In re Superior Court Order Dated April 8, 1983, 70 N.C. App. 63, 318 S.E.2d 843, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3604 (1984), rev'd, 315 N.C. 378 , 338 S.E.2d 307, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 1868 (1986).

§ 53C-5-2. Investment authority.

  1. In addition to any powers or investments authorized by any other section of this Chapter, a bank may invest in the following:
    1. The shares or other securities of the following:
      1. Any other depository institution.
      2. Any industrial bank, bankers’ bank, or other deposit-taking entity chartered or existing under any federal or State law, including the shares or other securities of clearing corporations defined in G.S. 25-8-102 , the shares or other securities of central reserve banks, and the shares of an Edge Act bank. The investment of any bank in the shares of a central reserve bank or bank organized under the Edge Act, 12 U.S.C. § 611, et seq., shall at no time exceed ten percent (10%) of the required capital of the bank making the investment.
      3. Any company in which a federally chartered institution is authorized to invest under any statute or any regulation, official circular, bulletin, order, or written interpretation issued by the OCC.
    2. Bonds or notes issued by or fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States Treasury. No bank shall be required to maintain a reserve against deposits secured by United States Treasury bonds or notes equal in market value to the amount of such deposits, and such bonds or notes shall be valid security for all loans and deposits to the same extent as are any obligations of the United States.
    3. Federal farm loan bonds, notes, or similar obligations issued by a farm credit system institution.
    4. Securities issued by federal home loan banks pursuant to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended.
    5. Bonds or notes secured by a mortgage or deed of trust insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or the Veterans Administration, or in mortgages or deeds of trust on real estate that have been accepted for insurance or guarantee by the Federal Housing Administration, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or Veterans Administration, or in obligations of a national mortgage association, which obligations are insured or guaranteed by the United States government. No law of this State prescribing the nature, amount, or form of security or requiring security upon which loans or investments may be made, or prescribing the rates or time of payment of the interest any obligation may bear, or prescribing the period for which loans or investments may be made, shall apply to investments made pursuant to this subsection.
    6. Mutual funds, but subject to rules or orders adopted by the Commissioner.
  2. A bank may make an investment in a subsidiary that will be operated as any of the following:
    1. Bank operating subsidiary.
    2. Financial subsidiary.
    3. DPC subsidiary, as defined by G.S. 53C-1-4(30).
  3. No investment shall be made by a bank or a subsidiary pursuant to subsection (b) or (d) of this section unless the following apply:
    1. The investment is approved by the board of directors of the bank or a board-authorized committee.
    2. The bank has carefully investigated the business or activity in which the subsidiary established by the investment will engage.
    3. The bank has established the risk management and financial controls necessary to engage in the business or activity in a safe and sound manner.
    4. The bank has, and following the making of the investment and the application of the provisions of this subsection, will continue to satisfy the capital requirements of this Chapter.
  4. A subsidiary may invest in a lower-tier subsidiary, subject to the same requirements and limitations applicable to a bank’s investment in a subsidiary.
  5. Except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, a bank or subsidiary proposing to make an investment described in subsection (b) or (d) of this section shall give prior written notice to the Commissioner, providing such detail as the Commissioner may require. Unless the Commissioner, within 30 days following receipt of the notice, notifies the bank or subsidiary that the Commissioner objects to the proposed investment, the bank or subsidiary may complete the investment. However, the Commissioner may extend the period within which to object to the proposed investment if the Commissioner determines that it raises issues that require additional information or additional time for analysis. While the objection period is so extended, the bank or subsidiary may not proceed with respect to the proposed investment. A bank may appeal an objection by the Commissioner pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 .
  6. The prior notice requirement provided by subsection (e) of this section shall not apply if all of the following apply:
    1. The bank is well-capitalized and well-managed as demonstrated by the supervisory rating it received during its most recent examination.
    2. Each activity of the subsidiary in which the investment is to be made is either of the following:
      1. One in which the bank is then engaged or has previously been engaged, directly or through a different subsidiary, and for which all necessary approvals of bank supervisory agencies and of the Commissioner have previously been obtained and remain in effect.
      2. One for which no prior notice or application for approval to any federal bank supervisory authority is required.
    3. A bank that makes an investment pursuant to the exception created by this subsection shall nevertheless notify the Commissioner in writing of the investment within 30 days thereafter.
  7. Any bank, out-of-state bank, national bank, or any subsidiary thereof that engages in an activity subject to licensure and/or regulation under the laws of this State, other than this Chapter, shall be subject to licensure and/or regulation on a basis that does not arbitrarily discriminate by the appropriate regulatory agency which licenses and/or regulates nonbanks that engage in the same activity.
  8. The Commissioner shall monitor the impact of investment activities of banks and their subsidiaries under this section on the safety and soundness of such banks. Any securities owned or hereafter acquired in excess of the limitations herein imposed shall be disposed of at public or private sale within six months after the date of acquiring the securities and, if not so disposed of, they shall be charged to profit and loss account and no longer carried on the books as an asset. The limit of time in which securities shall be disposed of or charged off the books of the bank may be extended by the Commissioner if in the Commissioner’s judgment it is for the best interest of the bank that the extension be granted, provided that the limitations imposed in this section on the ownership of shares or other equity ownership interest in companies are suspended only to the extent that any bank operating under the supervision of the Commissioner may subscribe for and purchase shares and other equity ownership interests in, or debentures, bonds, or other types of securities of, any company organized under the laws of the United States for the purposes of insuring the depositors a part or all of their funds on deposit in banks to the extent as security ownership is required in order to obtain the benefits of deposit insurance for such depositors.
  9. A bank may purchase, hold, and convey real estate other than bank premises for the following purposes:
    1. As security for extensions of credit made or moneys due to it when that real estate has been mortgaged to it in good faith.
    2. When the real estate has been purchased at sales upon foreclosures of mortgages and deeds of trust held or owned by it, or on judgments or decrees obtained and rendered for debts due to it, or through deeds in lieu of foreclosure or other settlements affecting security of those debts. All real property acquired under this subdivision shall be sold by the bank within five years after it is acquired unless, upon application by the bank, the Commissioner extends the time within which the sale shall be made.
  10. A bank’s investment in any bonds or other debt obligations of any one person, other than obligations of the United States government or an agency thereof, or other obligations guaranteed by the United States, this State, another state, or other political subdivision of this State or another state, shall at no time exceed ten percent (10%) of the sum of (i) the bank’s “capital,” as that term is defined in G.S. 53C-1-4 , plus (ii) those portions of the bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred tax assets, and intangible assets that are excluded from the bank’s capital under 12 C.F.R. Part 325.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 8.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 8, effective April 16, 2013, in subsection (c), deleted the former first sentence which read: “An investment by a bank or a bank subsidiary pursuant to subsection (b) or (d) of this section shall receive the same accounting and regulatory treatment as is accorded to such investment by the bank’s primary federal supervisor.”, and in the second sentence deleted “bank” preceding “subsidiary pursuant” in the present first sentence; added “or a board-authorized committee” at the end of subdivision (c)(1); rewrote subsection (d) which read: “A bank operating subsidiary may make an investment of any size in a lower-tier subsidiary.”; in subsection (e), deleted “bank operating” preceding “subsidiary” throughout the subsection, in the first sentence, substituted “(b) or (d)” for “(b), (c), or (d)” and added the last sentence; and substituted “the sum of (i) the bank’s ‘capital,’ as that term is defined in G.S. 53C-1-4 , plus (ii) those portions of the bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred tax assets, and intangible assets that are excluded from the bank’s capital under 12 C.F.R. Part 325” for “its required capital” at the end of subsection (j).

§ 53C-5-3. Banks, fiduciaries authorized to invest in securities approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Administration.

  1. Insured Mortgages and Obligation of National Mortgage Associations and Federal Home Loan Banks. —  It shall be lawful for all commercial and industrial banks, trust companies, building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, mortgagees and loan correspondents approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or Federal Housing Administration, and other financial institutions engaged in business in this State, and for guardians, executors, administrators, trustees, or others acting in a fiduciary capacity in this State to invest, to the same extent that such funds may be invested in interest-bearing obligations of the United States, their funds or moneys in their custody or possession that are eligible for investment, in bonds or notes secured by a mortgage or deed of trust insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or the Veterans Administration, or in mortgages or deeds of trust on real estate which have been accepted for insurance or guarantee by the Federal Housing Administration, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or Veterans Administration, and in obligations of a national mortgage association, which obligations are insured or guaranteed by the United States Government, or bonds, debentures, consolidated bonds, or other obligations of any federal home loan bank or banks.
  2. Insured or Guaranteed Loans; Loans Purchased by National Mortgage Associations and Federal Home Loan Banks. —  All such banks, trust companies, building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, mortgagees and loan correspondents approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or Federal Housing Administration, and other financial institutions, and also all such guardians, executors, administrators, trustees, or others acting in a fiduciary capacity in this State, may make such loans, secured by real estate, as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Administration, a national mortgage association, or the Veterans Administration has insured or guaranteed, or has made a commitment to insure or guarantee, and may obtain such insurance or guarantee; provided, further, that the above designated financial institutions may make loans, secured by real estate, that are eligible and committed for sale to a national mortgage association, federal home loan bank, federal home loan mortgage corporation, or other agency or instrumentality of the United States.
  3. Eligibility for Credit Insurance. —  All banks, trust companies, building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, mortgagees and loan correspondents approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or Federal Housing Administration, and other financial institutions, on being approved as eligible for credit insurance by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Administration, or the Veterans Administration, may make such loans as are insured by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or Federal Housing Administration or insured or guaranteed by the Veterans Administration.
  4. Certain Securities Made Eligible for Collaterals. —  Whenever by statute of this State collateral is required as security for the deposit of public or other funds; or deposits are required to be made with any public official or department; or an investment of capital or surplus, or a reserve or other fund is required to be maintained, consisting of designated securities, bonds, and notes secured by a mortgage or deed of trust insured or guaranteed by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, or Veterans Administration, debentures issued by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or the Federal Housing Administration and obligations of a national mortgage association shall be eligible for such purposes.
  5. General Laws Not Applicable. —  No law of this State prescribing the nature, amount, or form of security or requiring security upon which loans or investments may be made, or prescribing or limiting the rates or time of payment of the interest any obligation may bear, or prescribing or limiting the period for which loans or investments may be made, shall be deemed to apply to loans or investments made pursuant to the foregoing paragraphs.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Article 6. Bank Operations.

§ 53C-6-1. Loans and extensions of credit.

  1. A bank may make a loan or extension of credit secured by the pledge of its own shares or the shares of its holding company, provided:
    1. When a bank exercises its security interest in shares of the bank or its holding company, it shall dispose of all of the shares within a period of six months. If the shares have not been disposed of within six months, the shares shall be charged to profit and loss and no longer carried as an asset of the bank. The Commissioner may extend the six-month period not to exceed an additional six months.
    2. A bank may not extend credit to finance the purchase of or to carry shares of the bank or the shares of its holding company. For purposes of this subsection, the phrase “to carry” has the meaning set forth in 12 C.F.R. Part 221, as promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board.
  2. Loans and Extensions of Credit — Limitations:
    1. The total loans and extensions of credit, both direct and indirect, by a bank to a person, other than a municipal corporation for money borrowed, including in the liabilities of a company the liabilities of the several members of the company, outstanding at one time and not fully secured, as determined in a manner consistent with subdivision (2) of this subsection, by collateral having a market value at least equal to the amount of the loan or extension of credit, shall not exceed the greater of (i) fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of the bank’s capital plus those portions of the bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred tax assets, and intangible assets that are excluded from the bank’s capital under 12 C.F.R. Part 325 or (ii) the amount permitted for national banks in this State by statute or regulation of the Comptroller of the Currency.
    2. The total loans and extensions of credit, both direct and indirect, by a bank to a person outstanding at one time and fully secured by readily marketable collateral having a market value, as determined by reliable and continuously available price quotations, at least equal to the amount of the loan or extension of credit outstanding, shall not exceed the greater of (i) ten percent (10%) of the sum of the bank’s capital plus those portions of the bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred tax assets, and intangible assets that are excluded from the bank’s capital under 12 C.F.R. Part 325 or (ii) the amount permitted for national banks by statute or regulation of the Comptroller of the Currency. This limitation shall be separate from and in addition to the limitation contained in subdivision (1) of this subsection.
    3. The following shall not be considered as extensions of credit within the meaning of this section; provided that the limitations of this subsection shall not apply to loans or obligations to the extent that they are secured or covered by guarantees or by commitments or agreements to take over or purchase the same made by any federal reserve bank or by the United States or any department, board, bureau, commission, or establishment of the United States, including any corporation wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the United States:
      1. The discount of bills of exchange drawn in good faith against actual existing values.
      2. The discount of solvent trade acceptances or other solvent commercial or business paper actually owned by the person negotiating the same.
      3. Loans or extensions of credit secured by a segregated deposit account in the lending bank.
      4. The purchase of bankers’ acceptances of the kind described in section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act and issued by other depository institutions.
      5. The purchase of any notes and the making of any loans secured by not less than a like face amount of bonds of the United States or any agency of the United States; or other obligations guaranteed by the United States government or the State of North Carolina; or certificates of indebtedness of the United States, or agency thereof; or other obligations guaranteed by the United States government.
    4. For purposes of this subsection, the following definitions and conditions apply:
      1. “Person” includes an individual or a corporation, partnership, trust, association, joint venture, pool, syndicate, sole proprietorship, unincorporated organization, or any other form of entity not specifically listed; provided, the term “person” shall not include (i) a clearing organization registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (or its successor) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (or its successor) or any federal banking agency or (ii) a bank’s affiliates.
      2. Loans or extensions of credit to one person include loans made to other persons when the proceeds of the loans or extensions of credit are to be used for the direct benefit of the first person or the persons are engaged in a common enterprise.
      3. For purposes of this section, extensions of credit by a bank to a person shall include the bank’s credit exposures to the person in derivative transactions with the bank.
      4. “Derivative transaction” includes any transaction that is a contract, agreement, swap, warrant, note, or option that is based, in whole or in part, on the value of, any interest in, or any quantitative measure or the occurrence of any event relating to one or more commodities, securities, debt instruments, currencies, interest or other rates, indices, or assets.
      5. Credit exposure to a person in connection with a derivative transaction shall be determined based on an amount that the bank reasonably determines, in accordance with customary industry practices under the terms of the derivative transaction or otherwise, would be its loss if the person were to default on the date of determination, taking into account any netting and collateral arrangements and any guarantees or other credit enhancements, provided that the bank may elect to determine credit exposure on the basis of such other method of determining credit exposure as may be permitted by the bank’s primary federal regulator.
  3. The Commissioner shall monitor the lending activities of banks under this section for undue credit concentrations and inadequate risk diversification that could adversely affect the safety and soundness of the banks.
  4. Rules adopted by the Commissioner to ensure that extensions of credit made by banks are in keeping with sound lending practices and to promote the purposes of this Chapter shall not prohibit a bank from making any extension of credit that is a permitted extension of credit for a federally chartered institution.
  5. Any bank may, by resolution duly passed at a meeting of its board of directors or a board-authorized committee, request the Commissioner to suspend the limitations on loans set forth in this section as the limitations may apply to any particular loan (i) on the bank’s books that then exceeds such limitations, or (ii) which the bank desires to make or modify in a manner that would not otherwise be permitted in the absence of a suspension of such limitations. Upon receipt of a duly certified copy of such resolution, the Commissioner may, in the Commissioner’s discretion and subject to such requirements, limitations, and conditions as the Commissioner deems appropriate, suspend the limitations on loans set forth in this section insofar as they apply to the loan in question.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, ss. 9, 10.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, ss. 9, 10, effective April 16, 2013, in subdivisions (b)(1) and (b)(2), added “(i)” following “exceed the greater of” and substituted “sum of the bank’s capital plus those portions of the bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred tax assets, and intangible assets that are excluded from the bank’s capital under 12 C.F.R. Part 325 or (ii) the amount” for “capital of the bank or the percentage.”; and added subsection (e).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 6 (G.S. 53-43 et seq.) and former Article 12 (G.S. 53-146 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Purpose. —

The wisdom of this section and G.S. 53-111 [now repealed] is manifest; banks whose business is conducted in strict compliance therewith seldom become insolvent. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Section Not Retroactive. —

The statutory limitation upon a bank making loans to any one person or class of common interest does not apply to loans, or extensions or renewals thereof, existing at the date of the ratification of this section. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Loss of Assets Must Be Shown in Action for Violation of Section. —

In an action against the managing officials of a bank for wrongful depletion of assets in mismanagement of the affairs of the bank in making loans in excess of the limit set forth in this section, the evidence is insufficient to be submitted to a jury, if it appears that no loss to the assets of the bank has been caused by the acts of the officials. Gordon v. Pendleton, 202 N.C. 241 , 162 S.E. 546, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 470 (1932).

Liability of Bank’s Officers. —

A bank must act through its officers and directors, and where they have violated the provisions of this section as to lending the bank’s money, the offense is committed by them under the meaning of the statute, and they are individually indictable therefor. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925); State v. Davidson, 205 N.C. 735 , 172 S.E. 489, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 52 (1934).

Showing of Knowledge of Violation Is Sufficient for Conviction. —

Where the official position of an officer of a bank is such as necessarily to acquaint him of the violation of the statute respecting the making of loans, and to fix him as a party thereto, it is sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of the misdemeanor prescribed by G.S. 53-134 [now repealed]. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Intent to Defraud Not Element of Offense. —

An intent to defraud the bank or others is not required to be either alleged in the indictment or proved upon the trial of the issue raised by a plea of not guilty. Neither the bank nor any of its officers or directors have any discretion as to the making of loans which are thus forbidden. Intent is, therefore, not an element of the crime. The willful doing of the unlawful act constitutes the crime declared by G.S. 53-134 [now repealed] to be a misdemeanor. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Consolidation of Indictments under This Section and G.S. 53-111 [now repealed]. —

An indictment charging the officer of the bank of violating G.S. 53-111, and also unlawfully making loans for the bank to certain persons in excess of the maximum percentage of the capital stock and permanent surplus, in violation of this section, alleges the commission of crimes of the same class. Where there are two indictments thereof against the same person they may be consolidated and tried together by the court. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 117 (1925).

Section is for protection of bank only. O'Brien v. Reece, 45 N.C. App. 610, 263 S.E.2d 817, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690 (1980).

Ownership of Funds. —

Absent any other evidence, this section is not dispositive as to the ownership of funds. O'Brien v. Reece, 45 N.C. App. 610, 263 S.E.2d 817, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690 (1980).

Instrument in Husband’s Name and Payable to Himself “or” Wife. —

The certificate of deposit by a bank in the name of the husband, payable to himself “or” his wife does not fall within the provisions of this section. It applies only where the deposit is made in the names of two persons and payable to either; nor can construing the word “or” as meaning “and” have the effect of creating a tenancy in common. Jones v. Fullbright, 197 N.C. 274 , 148 S.E. 229, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 210 (1929).

§ 53C-6-2. Deposits.

  1. A bank may, consistent with applicable law and safe and sound banking practices, offer all types of deposit accounts upon such terms and conditions as the bank considers appropriate.
  2. A bank shall secure insurance for its deposits from the FDIC.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-3. Securing deposits.

  1. A bank may not create a lien on its assets or otherwise secure the repayment of a deposit, except as authorized or required by this section, other laws of this State, or federal law.
  2. A bank may pledge its assets to secure a deposit of the government of this State or any other state, any agency or political subdivision of this State or any other state, the United States government, any agency or instrumentality of the United States, or any Indian tribe recognized by the United States government as eligible for the services provided to Indian tribes by the Secretary of the Interior because of its status as an Indian tribe.
  3. This section does not prohibit the pledge of assets by a bank to secure the repayment of money borrowed.
  4. An act, deed, conveyance, pledge, or contract in violation of this section is void.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-4. Minors.

  1. A bank may issue and operate a deposit account in the name of a minor or in the name of two or more individuals, one or more of whom are minors, and receive payments, pay withdrawals, accept a pledge of the account, issue automated teller machine (ATM) and debit cards, contract for overdraft protection, and act in any other manner with respect to the account on the order of the minor with like effect as if the minor were of full age and legal capacity. Any payment to or at the direction of a minor is a discharge of the bank to the extent thereof. The account shall be held for the exclusive right and benefit of the minor and any joint owners, free from the control of all other persons except creditors. A minor who obtains a deposit account from a bank under this subsection, whether individually or together with others, is bound by the terms of the deposit account agreement to the same extent as if the minor were of full age and legal capacity.
  2. Any bank may lease a safe deposit box to a minor or to two or more individuals, one or more of whom are minors. With respect to any such lease, a bank may deal with the minor in all regards as if the minor were of full age and legal capacity. A minor entering a lease agreement with a bank under this subsection, whether individually or together with others, is bound by the terms of the safe deposit box agreement to the same extent as if the minor were of full age and legal capacity.
  3. If a minor with a deposit account, other than a joint account with right of survivorship or a Payable on Death account, dies, a parent or legal guardian of the minor may access and withdraw the funds on deposit, and the bank is discharged to the extent of any withdrawal. If a minor with a safe deposit box dies, the provisions of G.S. 28A-15-13 shall control the opening, inventory, and release of contents of the safe deposit box.
  4. This section shall not affect the law governing transactions with minors in cases outside the scope of this section, including transactions that constitute an extension of credit to the minor.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-5.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

§ 53C-6-6. Joint accounts.

  1. Any two or more individuals may establish a joint deposit account by written contract. The deposit account shall be held for them as joint tenants. The account also may be held pursuant to G.S. 41-2.1 of the General Statutes and have the incidents set forth in that section. If the account is held pursuant to G.S. 41-2.1 , the contract shall set forth that fact.
  2. Unless the individuals establishing a joint account have agreed with the bank that withdrawals require more than one signature, payment by the bank to, or at the direction of, any joint tenant designated in the contract authorized by this section shall be a total discharge of the bank’s obligation as to the amount so paid.
  3. Funds in a joint account established with right of survivorship shall belong to the surviving joint tenant or tenants upon the death of a joint tenant, and the funds shall be subject only to the personal representative’s right of collection as set forth in G.S. 28A-15-10(a)(3), or as provided in G.S. 41-2.1 if the account is established pursuant to the provisions of that section. Payment by the bank of funds in the joint account to a surviving joint tenant or tenants shall terminate the personal representative’s authority under G.S. 28A-15-10(a)(3) to collect against the bank for the funds so paid, but the personal representative’s authority to collect such funds from the surviving joint tenant or tenants is not terminated.
  4. A pledge of a joint account by any one or more of the joint tenants, unless otherwise specifically agreed between the bank and all joint tenants in writing, shall be a valid pledge and transfer of the account or of the amount so pledged, shall be binding upon all joint tenants, shall not operate to sever or terminate the joint ownership of all or any part of the account, and shall survive the death of any joint tenant.
  5. A bank is not liable to joint tenants for complying in good faith with a writ of execution, garnishment, attachment, levy, or other legal process that appears to have been issued by a court or other authority of competent jurisdiction and seeks funds held in the name of any one or more of the joint tenants.
  6. Persons establishing a joint account with right of survivorship under this section shall sign a statement showing their election of the right of survivorship in the account and containing language set forth in a conspicuous manner and substantially similar to the following: “BANK (or name of institution) JOINT ACCOUNT WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP G.S. 53C-6-6 We understand that by establishing a joint account under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 53C-6-6 that:
    1. The bank (or name of institution) may pay the money in the account to, or on the order of, any person named as a joint holder of the account unless we have agreed with the bank that withdrawals require more than one signature; and
    2. Upon the death of one joint owner, the money remaining in the account will belong to the surviving joint owners and will not pass by inheritance to the heirs of the deceased joint owner or be controlled by the deceased joint owner’s will.

      _______________

      _______________ ”

  7. This section does not repeal or modify any provision of law relating to estate taxes.
  8. Any joint tenant may terminate a joint account.
  9. Where a joint account is held by two or more individuals and a joint tenant does not wish for the account to be terminated but requests to be removed from the account, the bank shall remove the joint tenant from the account. The joint account shall continue in the names of the remaining tenant or tenants. Any joint tenant who requested to be removed from an account remains liable for any debts incurred in connection with the joint account during the period in which the individual was a named joint tenant.
  10. Any joint account created under the provisions of G.S. 53-146.1 as it existed prior to October 1, 2012, shall for all purposes be governed by the provisions of this section on and after October 1, 2012, and any reference to G.S. 53-146.1 in any document concerning the account shall be deemed a reference to this section.
  11. This section shall not be deemed exclusive. Deposit accounts not conforming to this section shall be governed by other applicable provisions of the General Statutes or the common law, as appropriate.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 11.

Editor’s Note.

G.S. 53-146.1, referred to in subsection (j), was repealed by Session Laws 2012-56, s. 1, effective October 1, 2012.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 11, effective April 16, 2013, in subsection (j), inserted “on and” near the middle and substituted “document concerning the account” for “statement electing a right of survivorship” near the end.

CASE NOTES

Analysis

I.Decisions Under Former G.S. 53-146

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former G.S. 53-146 and prior law.

Section is for protection of bank only. O'Brien v. Reece, 45 N.C. App. 610, 263 S.E.2d 817, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690 (1980).

Ownership of Funds. —

Absent any other evidence, this section is not dispositive as to the ownership of funds. O'Brien v. Reece, 45 N.C. App. 610, 263 S.E.2d 817, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690 (1980).

Instrument in Husband’s Name and Payable to Himself “or” Wife. —

The certificate of deposit by a bank in the name of the husband, payable to himself “or” his wife does not fall within the provisions of this section. It applies only where the deposit is made in the names of two persons and payable to either; nor can construing the word “or” as meaning “and” have the effect of creating a tenancy in common. Jones v. Fullbright, 197 N.C. 274 , 148 S.E. 229, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 210 (1929).

II.Decisions Under Former G.S. 53-146.1

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former G.S. 53-146.1 and prior law.

Signed Statement Still Required to Create Survivorship. —

This section retains requirement that parties execute signed statement of their intent to create right of survivorship. In re Estate of Heffner, 99 N.C. App. 327, 392 S.E.2d 770, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 497 (1990).

Executor Holding Joint Tenancy with Decedent Could Not Be Liable for Converting Funds Contained in Joint Account. —

Beneficiary could not legally establish a claim of conversion against an executor, as the executor was a true and rightful owner of the funds held with the decedent as a joint tenant and no evidence was presented that the decedent and the executor agreed with or required the bank to demand that withdrawals contain both owners’ signatures. Horry v. Woodbury, 189 N.C. App. 669, 659 S.E.2d 88, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 706 (2008), rev'd, 363 N.C. 7 , 673 S.E.2d 127, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 112 (2009).

No Breach of Attorney-in-Fact’s Fiduciary Duty. —

Attorney-in-fact did not breach the attorney-in-fact’s fiduciary duty to the attorney-in-fact’s principal by transferring funds from an account the principal held jointly with the principal’s husband to an account the principal held jointly with the attorney-in-fact and then transferring the funds to the attorney-in-fact because (1) the transfer to the account the principal held jointly with the attorney-in-fact carried out the principal’s wishes, (2) the transfer was not a gift, in violation of G.S. 32A-14.1, as the principal was alive and a joint tenant of the account into which the funds were transferred, and (3) the attorney-in-fact moved no funds from the account held jointly with the principal until after the principal died, when the attorney-in-fact owned the funds, pursuant to G.S. 53-146.1 [now repealed]. Albert v. Cowart, 219 N.C. App. 546, 727 S.E.2d 564, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 446 (2012).

Right of Survivorship Found. —

Certain joint bank account held by a decedent and her nephew incorporated a right of survivorship because the decedent and the nephew executed individual customer access agreement forms for this account, which specifically authorized the incorporation of a right of survivorship. Albert v. Cowart, 200 N.C. App. 57, 682 S.E.2d 773, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1561 (2009).

§ 53C-6-7. Payable on Death accounts.

  1. If any individual establishing a deposit account executes a written agreement with the bank containing a statement that it is executed pursuant to the provisions of this section and providing for the account to be held in the name of the individual as owner for one or more beneficiaries, the account and any balance thereof shall be held as a Payable on Death account. The account shall have the following incidents:
    1. Any owner during the owner’s lifetime may change any designated beneficiary by a written direction to the bank.
    2. If there are two or more owners of a Payable on Death account, the owners shall own the account as joint tenants with right of survivorship and, except as otherwise provided in this section, the account shall have the incidents set forth in G.S. 53C-6-6 .
    3. Unless the individual establishing the Payable on Death account has agreed with the bank that a withdrawal requires more than one signature, payment by the bank to, on the order of, or at the direction of any owner is a total discharge of the bank’s obligation as to the paid amount.
    4. If any beneficiary is an individual, there may be one or more beneficiaries, each of whom shall be an individual, and the following requirements shall apply:
      1. If only one beneficiary is living and of legal age at the death of the last surviving owner, the beneficiary shall be the owner of the account and payment by the bank to the owner shall be a total discharge of the bank’s obligation as to the amount paid. If two or more beneficiaries are living at the death of the last surviving owner, they shall be owners of the account as joint tenants with right of survivorship as provided in G.S. 53C-6-6 , and payment by the bank to the owners or any of the owners shall be a total discharge of the bank’s obligation as to the amount paid.
      2. If only one beneficiary is living and that beneficiary is not of legal age at the death of the last surviving owner, the bank shall transfer the funds in the account to the general guardian or guardian of the estate, if any, of the minor beneficiary. If no guardian of the minor beneficiary has been appointed, the bank shall hold the funds in a similar interest-bearing account in the name of the minor until the minor reaches the age of majority or until a duly appointed guardian withdraws the funds.
    5. If any beneficiary is not an individual, there shall be only one beneficiary.
    6. If one or more owners survive the last surviving beneficiary who was a natural person, or if a beneficiary who is an entity other than a natural person should cease to exist before the death of the owner, the account shall become an individual account of the owner, or a joint account with right of survivorship of the owners, and shall have the legal incidents of an individual account in a case of a single owner or a joint account with right of survivorship, as provided in G.S. 53C-6-6, in the case of multiple owners.
    7. Prior to the death of the last surviving owner, no beneficiary shall have any ownership interest in a Payable on Death account. Funds in a Payable on Death account established pursuant to this subsection shall belong to the beneficiary or beneficiaries upon the death of the last surviving owner, and the funds shall be subject only to the personal representative’s right of collection as set forth in G.S. 28A-15-10(a)(1). Payment by the bank of funds in the Payable on Death account to the beneficiary or beneficiaries shall terminate the personal representative’s authority under G.S. 28A-15-10(a)(1) to collect against the bank for the funds so paid, but the personal representative’s authority to collect such funds from the beneficiary or beneficiaries is not terminated.
    8. A pledge of a Payable on Death account by any owner, unless otherwise specifically agreed between the bank and all owners in writing, is a valid pledge and transfer of the account or of the pledged amount, is binding upon all owners and beneficiaries, does not operate to sever or terminate the joint ownership of all or any part of the account, and survives the death of any owner or any beneficiary.The individual establishing an account under this subsection shall sign a statement containing language set forth in a conspicuous manner and substantially similar to the following language. The following language may be on a signature card or in an explanation of the account that is set out in a separate document whose receipt is acknowledged by the individual establishing the account: “BANK (or name of institution) PAYABLE ON DEATH ACCOUNT G.S. 53C-6-7 I (or we) understand that by establishing a Payable on Death account under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 53C-6-7 that:1. During my (or our) lifetime I (or we), individually or jointly, may withdraw the money in the account.2. By written direction to the bank (or name of institution) I (or we), individually or jointly, may change the beneficiary or beneficiaries.3. Upon my (or our) death, the money remaining in the account will belong to the beneficiary or beneficiaries, and the money will not be inherited by my (or our) heirs or be controlled by will. _______________ ”
  2. This section shall not be deemed exclusive. Deposit accounts not conforming to this section shall be governed by other applicable provisions of the General Statutes or the common law, as appropriate.
  3. No addition to the accounts, nor any withdrawal, payment, or change of beneficiary, shall affect the nature of the account as Payable on Death accounts or affect the right of any owner to terminate the account.
  4. This section does not repeal or modify any provisions of law relating to estate taxes.
  5. Any Payable on Death account created under the provisions of G.S. 53-146.2 , as it existed prior to October 1, 2012, shall for all purposes be governed by the provisions of this section on and after October 1, 2012, and any reference to G.S. 53-146.2 in any document concerning the account shall be deemed a reference to this section.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 12; 2017-165, s. 6.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 12, effective April 16, 2013, added subsection (e).

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 6, effective July 21, 2017, in the introductory paragraph of subsection (a), substituted “individual” for “natural person” twice, and substituted “executes” for “shall execute”; rewrote subdivision (a)(3), which read: “Any owner may withdraw funds by writing checks or otherwise, as set forth in the account contract, and receive payment in cash or check payable to the owner’s personal order.”; in subdivision (a)(4), substituted “any beneficiary is an individual” for “the beneficiary is a natural person”, inserted “each of whom shall be an individual”, and inserted “requirements”; substituted “any beneficiary is not an individual” for “the beneficiary is an entity other than a natural person” in subdivision (a)(5); added subdivision (a)(8); and, in the undesignated paragraph in the first sentence, substituted “individual” for “natural person” in the beginning, substituted “following language” for “language set out below” at the end, and, in the second sentence, inserted “following” near the beginning and substituted “individual” for “person” near the end.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former G.S. 53-146.2 A and prior law.

Attachment of Funds in Trust for Minor. —

Funds deposited in a trust established under this section by a judgment debtor for the benefit of his minor son were subject to attachment by judgment creditors, since the trust was revocable and the debtor could freely withdraw funds from it. Jimenez v. Brown, 131 N.C. App. 818, 509 S.E.2d 241, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 1548 (1998).

Order for Widow to Repay Funds Proper. —

Since a transfer of funds from a decedent’s payable on death account by his widow took place while the deceased was still alive, the widow had no ownership interest in the funds in the account at the time that she transferred the funds, and partial summary judgment that the widow repay the money was proper. Estate of Redden v. Redden, 179 N.C. App. 113, 632 S.E.2d 794, 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 1638 (2006).

§ 53C-6-8. Personal agency accounts.

  1. Any person may establish a personal agency account by written contract containing a statement that it is executed pursuant to the provisions of this section. A personal agency account may be any type of deposit account. The written contract shall name an agent who shall have authority to act on behalf of the depositor in the manner set out in this subsection. The agent shall have the authority to do the following:
    1. Make, sign, or execute checks drawn on the account or otherwise make withdrawals from the account.
    2. Endorse checks made payable to the principal for deposit only into the account.
    3. Deposit cash or negotiable instruments, including instruments endorsed by the principal, into the account.
  2. A person establishing an account under this section shall sign a statement containing language substantially similar to the following in a conspicuous manner: “BANK (or name of institution) PERSONAL AGENCY ACCOUNT G.S. 53C-6-8 The undersigned understands that by establishing a personal agency account under the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 53C-6-8, the agent named in the account may:1. Sign checks drawn on the account.2. Make deposits into the account.The undersigned also understand that if the undersigned is a natural person, upon his or her death, the money remaining in the account will be controlled by his or her will or inherited by his or her heirs. _______________ ”
  3. An account created under the provisions of this section grants no ownership right or interest in the agent. Upon the death of the principal, there is no right of survivorship to the account, and the authority set out in subsection (a) of this section terminates.
  4. The written contract referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall provide that the principal may elect to extend the authority of the agent set out in subsection (a) of this section to act on behalf of the principal in regard to the account, notwithstanding the subsequent incapacity or mental incompetence of the principal. If the principal is an individual and elects to extend the authority of the agent, then upon the subsequent incapacity or mental incompetence of the principal, the agent may continue to exercise the authority, without the requirement of bond or of accounting to any court, until the agent receives actual knowledge that the authority has been terminated. The duly qualified guardian of the estate of the incapacitated or incompetent principal, or the duly appointed attorney-in-fact for the incapacitated or incompetent principal acting pursuant to a durable power of attorney, as defined in G.S. 32A-8 [see now G.S. 32C-1-102 ], which grants to the attorney-in-fact the authority in regard to the account that is granted to the agent by the written contract executed pursuant to the provisions of this section, shall have the power, upon notifying the agent and providing written notice to the bank where the personal agency account is established, to terminate the agent’s authority to act on behalf of the principal with respect to the account. Upon termination of the agent’s authority, the agent shall account to the guardian or attorney-in-fact for all actions of the agent in regard to the account during the incapacity or incompetence of the principal. If the principal is an individual and does not elect to extend the authority of the agent, then upon the subsequent incapacity or mental incompetence of the principal, the authority of the agent set out in subsection (a) of this section terminates.
  5. When an account under this section has been established, all or part of the account or any interest or dividend may be paid on a check made, signed, or executed by the agent. In the absence of actual knowledge that the principal has died or that the agency created by the account has been terminated, the payment shall be valid and sufficient discharge to the bank for payment so made.
  6. A personal agency account shall have only one owner and one agent. The owner shall retain the authority to change the named agent on the personal agency account.
  7. Any personal agency account created under the provisions of G.S. 53-146.3, as it existed prior to October 1, 2012, shall for all purposes be governed by the provisions of this section on and after October 1, 2012, and any reference to G.S. 53-146.3 in any document concerning the account shall be deemed a reference to this section.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 13; 2017-165, s. 7.

Editor’s Note.

G.S. 32A-8 , referred to in subsection (d), was repealed by Session Laws 2017-153, s. 2.8, effective January 1, 2018. For similar current provisions, see G.S. 32C-1-102 .

G.S. 53-146.3, referred to in subsection (g), was repealed by Session Laws 2012-56, s. 1, effective October 1, 2012.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 13, effective April 16, 2013, added “principal, or the duly appointed attorney-in-fact for the incapacitated or incompetent principal” in the third sentence of subsection (d); and, in subsection (g), inserted “on and” and substituted “document concerning” for “statement establishing” near the end.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 7, effective July 21, 2017, in subsection (d), substituted “an individual” for “a natural person” twice, and substituted “until the agent receives actual knowledge” for “until such time as the agent shall receive actual knowledge” near the end of the second sentence.

§ 53C-6-9. Accounts opened by adults for minors.

  1. One or more adults may open and maintain a custodial deposit account for or in the name of a minor and using the minor’s taxpayer identification number. Unless otherwise provided in the agreement governing the account the following terms apply:
    1. Beneficial ownership of the account vests exclusively in the minor. All interest credited to the account shall belong to the minor and shall be reported to the appropriate taxing authorities in the name of the minor using the minor’s taxpayer identification number.
    2. Except as otherwise provided, control of the account vests exclusively in the custodian whose name appears on the bank’s records for the account. If there is more than one custodian named on the bank’s account records, each may act independently. Any one or more of the custodians named on the bank’s records may turn over control of the account to the minor at any time, either before or after the minor reaches the age of majority.
    3. If the custodian has not already transferred control, then after the minor beneficiary reaches the age of majority, the beneficiary may instruct the bank to transfer control to the beneficiary and remove the named custodian.
    4. If the custodian or, if more than one custodian is on the account, the last of the custodians to survive dies before the minor reaches the age of majority, the minor’s parent or the minor’s legal guardian may act as custodian or name another custodian on the account.
  2. This section shall not be deemed exclusive. Accounts not conforming to this section shall be governed by other applicable provisions of the General Statutes, including Chapter 33A, the North Carolina Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, or the common law, as appropriate.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-10. Payment of balance of deceased person or person under disability to personal representative or guardian.

  1. A bank may pay any balance on deposit to the credit of any deceased individual to the duly qualified personal representative, collector, or public administrator of the decedent who is qualified as such under the laws of any state.
  2. A bank may pay any balance on deposit to the credit of any individual judicially declared incompetent or otherwise under a legal disability to the duly qualified personal representative, guardian, curator, conservator, or committee of the person declared incompetent or under disability who is qualified as such under the laws of any state.
  3. The presentation of a letter of qualification as personal representative, collector, public administrator, guardian, curator, conservator, or committee of the person issued or certified by the appointing court shall be conclusive proof of the jurisdiction of the court issuing the same and sufficient authority for the payment.
  4. Payment by a bank in good faith under the authority of this section discharges the liability of the bank to the extent of the payment.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-11. Powers of attorney; notice of revocation; payment after notice.

  1. Any bank may continue to recognize any act of an attorney-in-fact or other agent until the bank receives actual notice of the principal’s death or a written notice of revocation signed by the principal who granted the authority or, in the case of a company, evidence satisfactory to the bank of the revocation. Payment by the bank to or at the direction of an attorney-in-fact or other agent before receipt of the notice is a total discharge of the bank’s obligation as to the amount so paid.
  2. Notwithstanding that a bank has received written notice of revocation of the authority of an attorney-in-fact or other designated agent, a bank may, until 10 days after receipt of notice, pay any item made, drawn, accepted, or endorsed by the attorney-in-fact or agent prior to the revocation, provided that the item is otherwise properly payable.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-12. Account statements to be rendered annually or on request.

  1. Every bank shall render an account statement for each deposit account at least annually to the depositor; provided, however, the statements are not required for time deposits. Every bank shall render a statement of account for each deposit account, including time deposits upon receipt of an appropriate request reasonably made by a depositor.
  2. For purposes of this section, an account statement is deemed to have been “rendered” to a depositor as of the earlier of the date the statement is mailed to the depositor’s address as shown on bank records and the date the account is posted to the bank’s Web site in a manner and a form ensuring the statement to be readily available to the depositor; provided however, the bank and the depositor may agree that an account statement may be rendered by other means.
  3. Nothing in this section shall be construed to relieve the depositor from the duty of exercising due diligence in the review of an account statement rendered by the bank and of timely notification to the bank upon discovery of any error.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-13. Safe deposit boxes; unpaid rentals; procedure; escheats.

  1. If the rental due on a safe deposit box is 90 days or more past due, the lessor bank may send a notice by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the lessee or by another means agreed to in writing by the lessor bank and the lessee, stating that the safe deposit box will be opened and its contents stored at the expense of the lessee unless payment of the rental is made within 30 days of the date of the mailing of the notice or the date such notice is given by the means otherwise previously agreed to in writing by the lessor bank and the lessee. If the rental is not paid within the stated period, the box may be opened in the presence of an officer of the bank and of a notary public who is not a director, officer, employee, or shareholder of the bank. The contents shall be sealed in a package by the notary public, who shall write on the outside the name of the lessee and the date of the opening. The notary public shall execute a certificate reciting the name of the lessee, the date of the opening of the box, and a list of its contents. The certificate shall be included in the package, and a copy of the certificate shall be sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the lessee or by the means otherwise previously agreed to in writing by the lessor bank and the lessee. The package then shall be placed in the general vaults of the bank at a rental not exceeding the rental previously charged for the box.
  2. If the contents of the safe deposit box have not been claimed within two years of the mailing or other permissible delivery of the copy of the certificate to the lessee, the bank may send a further notice to the last known address of the lessee by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the lessee or by a means otherwise previously agreed to in writing by the lessor bank and the lessee, stating that unless the accumulated charges are paid within 30 days of the date of the mailing of the notice, the contents of the box will be delivered to the State Treasurer as abandoned property under the provisions of Chapter 116B of the General Statutes.
  3. The bank shall submit to the State Treasurer a verified inventory of all of the contents of the safe deposit box upon delivery of the contents of the box or such part thereof as shall be required by the State Treasurer under G.S. 116B-55 , but the bank may deduct from any cash of the lessee in the safe deposit box an amount equal to accumulated charges for rental and shall submit to the State Treasurer a verified statement of the charges and deduction. If there is no cash or insufficient cash to pay accumulated charges in the safe deposit box, the bank may submit to the State Treasurer a verified statement of accumulated charges or balance of the accumulated charges due, and the State Treasurer shall remit to the bank the charges or balance due, up to the value of the property in the safe deposit box delivered to the State Treasurer, less any costs or expenses of sale; but if the charges or balance due exceeds the value of the property, the State Treasurer shall remit only the value of the property, less costs or expenses of sale. Any accumulated charges for safe deposit box rental paid by the State Treasurer to the bank shall be deducted from the value of the property of the lessee delivered to the State Treasurer.
  4. Any property, including documents or writings of a private nature, that has little or no apparent financial value need not be sold but may be destroyed by the bank if the State Treasurer declines to receive the property under G.S. 116B-69(a).
  5. An explanation of the contractual provisions pertaining to default, together with reference to this section, shall be printed on every contract for rental of a safe deposit box.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-14. Reproduction and retention of records; admissibility of copies in evidence; disposition of originals; record production generally.

  1. Any bank may cause any or all records kept by it to be recorded, copied, or reproduced by any photographic, reproduction, electronic, or digital process or method, or by any other records retention technology approved by rule or order of the Commissioner, of a kind that is capable of accurately converting the records into tangible form within a reasonable time. Each such converted tangible form of record also shall be deemed a record.
  2. Any tangible form of a record shall be deemed for all purposes to be an original record and shall be admissible in evidence in all courts and administrative agencies in this State, if otherwise admissible, and the bank may destroy or otherwise dispose of the original form of the record; provided, however, that a bank shall retain either the originals or convertible form of its records for such period as may be required by law or by rule or order of the Commissioner. Any bank may dispose of any original or convertible form of a record that has been retained for the period prescribed by law or by rule or order of the Commissioner for its class.
  3. Originals and converted tangible forms of records shall not be held inadmissible in any court action or proceeding on the grounds that they lack certification, identification, or authentication and shall be received as evidence if otherwise admissible in any court or quasi-judicial proceeding if they have been identified and authenticated by the live testimony of a competent witness or if the records are accompanied by a certificate substantially in the following form: “CERTIFICATE REGARDING BANK RECORDS 1. The accompanying documents are true and correct copies of the records of [name of bank]. The records were made in the regular course of business of the bank at or near the time of the acts, events, or conditions they reflect.2. The undersigned is authorized to execute this certificate.3. This certificate is issued pursuant to G.S. 53C-6-14 .I certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of North Carolina, that the foregoing statements are true and correct.[Notarize as required by law for an affidavit]”

    Date: _______________ _________

    Signature

    _________

    Print or type name

    _________

    Title

  4. This section supplements and does not supersede G.S. 8-45.1 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-15. Establishment of branches.

  1. A bank may establish one or more branches in this State, whether de novo or by acquisition of existing branches of another depository institution, with the prior written approval of the Commissioner. The Commissioner’s approval may be given or withheld, in the Commissioner’s discretion, in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of this section.
  2. A bank may establish branches in another state, whether de novo or by acquisition of existing branches of another depository institution, in accordance with the provisions of applicable federal law and the laws of the other state, upon prior written approval of the Commissioner. The Commissioner’s approval may be given or withheld in the Commissioner’s discretion in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of this section.
  3. A bank seeking authority to establish a branch shall make application to the Commissioner in a form acceptable to the Commissioner. Not more than 30 days before nor less than 10 days after the filing of the application with the Commissioner, the applicant shall publish public notice of the filing of the application. The public notice shall contain all of the following:
    1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
    2. The physical address or location of the proposed branch, including street and city or town.
    3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the application to the Commissioner and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the date of publication of the public notice shall be considered. The public notice shall provide the then current mailing address of the Commissioner.
  4. A bank may conduct any activities at a branch in another state authorized under this section that are permissible for a bank chartered by the other state where the branch is located, except to the extent the activities are expressly prohibited by the laws of this State or by any rule or order of the Commissioner applicable to the bank.
  5. Upon receipt of an application to establish a branch, the Commissioner shall conduct an examination of the pertinent facts and information and may request such additional information as the Commissioner deems necessary to make a decision on the application. In deciding whether to approve a branch application, the Commissioner shall take into account such factors as the financial condition and history of the applicant; the adequacy of its capital; the applicant’s future earnings prospects; the character, competency, and experience of its management; the probable impact of the branch on the condition of the applicant bank and existing depository institutions in the community to be served; and the convenience and needs of the community the proposed branch is to serve.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Analysis

I.General Consideration

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 6 (G.S. 53-43 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Purpose. —

The motivation for this section was to minimize the danger of a run on a bank due to a rumor of insolvency. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

The purpose of subsection (b) of this section was to require that each separate branch contribute to the solvency of the system. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

The purpose to be accomplished by subsection (b) was protection of the solvency of banks. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

What Commission Must Find. —

As a condition precedent to the establishment of a branch, the Commissioner of Banks must find that such branch will meet the needs of the community and the probable volume of business will be sufficient to assure and maintain the solvency of such branch. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

No Provision for Approval Where Subsection (b) Test Not Met. —

No provision is made for the approval of any branch that fails to meet the requirements of subsection (b)(i) and (ii). State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

Consolidation of Applications for Hearing. —

Applications for branches may be consolidated and heard together, but the evidence and finding must be sufficient to support each application independent of the other. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

While two applications by a bank to establish branches in the same city may be consolidated for hearing, each application must be treated as a separate application and be approved or denied on the basis of the evidence relating thereto, and separate findings and conclusions must be made as to each application. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

II.Needs and Convenience Test

No Conflict with Federal Antitrust Statutes. —

There is no conflict between the policies of the federal antitrust statutes and the “need and convenience” test for the establishment of a branch bank. First Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 448 F.2d 637, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8073 (4th Cir. 1971).

Needs of Community Is an Administrative Question. —

With respect to banking, what will serve the needs of the community is, to a substantial degree, an administrative question involving a multiplicity of factors which cannot be given inflexible consideration. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Avery County Bank, 14 N.C. App. 283, 188 S.E.2d 9, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2111 , cert. denied, 281 N.C. 514 , 189 S.E.2d 35, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1091 (1972); State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.C. App. 183, 189 S.E.2d 496, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1856 (1972).

But Banking Commission Does Not Have Untrammeled Discretion. —

The Banking Commission does not have untrammeled discretion in determining what will meet the needs and promote the convenience of the community. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Avery County Bank, 14 N.C. App. 283, 188 S.E.2d 9, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2111 , cert. denied, 281 N.C. 514 , 189 S.E.2d 35, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1091 (1972).

Factors Used to Determine Need and Convenience. —

Determination of whether a proposed branch bank will meet the needs and promote the convenience of the community to be served should involve a consideration of at least the following factors: (1) whether existing banks provide a full complement of banking services at competitive rates and fees; (2) the need for specialized services offered by the applicant bank not presently available through existing banks, examples of such services being: a. larger lending limits, b. trust department services, c. consumer and commercial loan expertise, d. international banking, e. farm development services, f. industrial development services, g. automated accounting and check clearance services; (3) the extent to which management of existing banks has been active and vigorous as evidenced by the assumption of leadership and participation in the economic growth of the community; (4) the composition of the population and its prospects for growth; (5) the nature and strength of the economy and its prospects for growth; (6) the extent to which competition from the entry of a new bank in the area will stimulate the economy and make for a more healthy banking business; and (7) the extent to which the entry of the new bank has public support in the community. Bank of New Bern v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 353 F. Supp. 643, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13199 (E.D.N.C. 1972).

Factors Bearing on Need and Convenience Not Specified in Section. —

This section does not provide any degree of specificity as to the factors, proof of which would show the presence or absence of “need and convenience” for a new branch bank. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Camp, 409 F.2d 1086, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12979 (4th Cir. 1969); State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.C. App. 183, 189 S.E.2d 496, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1856 (1972).

Applicant Need Not Establish Existence of Specific Unmet Banking Need. —

Subsection (b) of this section does not require that an applicant bank establish the existence of specific, unmet banking needs as a prerequisite to the establishment of a branch bank. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Avery County Bank, 14 N.C. App. 283, 188 S.E.2d 9, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2111 , cert. denied, 281 N.C. 514 , 189 S.E.2d 35, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1091 (1972); State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.C. App. 183, 189 S.E.2d 496, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1856 (1972).

But Merely Offering to Provide Alternative Banking Services Is Not Sufficient. —

Absent some indication that additional competition is desirable, merely offering to provide alternative banking services is not sufficient under the statute. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Avery County Bank, 14 N.C. App. 283, 188 S.E.2d 9, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2111 , cert. denied, 281 N.C. 514 , 189 S.E.2d 35, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1091 (1972).

Fact that applicant is the largest bank in North Carolina is irrelevant, alone, in determining needs and convenience. Bank of New Bern v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 353 F. Supp. 643, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13199 (E.D.N.C. 1972).

Quantum of Proof Required. —

Quantum of proof to show need and convenience for the establishment of a branch office in a suburban area would be much less than that required to show need and convenience for the establishment of an entirely new banking facility in the city. Bank of New Bern v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 353 F. Supp. 643, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13199 (E.D.N.C. 1972).

Test of Substantial Evidence Not Met. —

Where the evidence is uncontradicted that the existing bank offer a full complement of banking services at competitive rates, that the only specialized services offered by the applicant which are not offered by the existing banks are larger lending limits and international banking for which the likelihood of any need now or in the future has not been shown, and that there is no indication the proposed branch has public support in the community, the decision that a new bank is necessary does not meet the test of substantial evidence. Bank of New Bern v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 353 F. Supp. 643, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13199 (E.D.N.C. 1972).

III.Solvency Test

Solvency tests under subsection (b) are twofold: Each new branch must not endanger the solvency of the parent bank and it must not endanger the solvency of another bank already in the field. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

Branch may not be established which would be financial failure or would endanger solvency of another bank already in the field. State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Lexington State Bank, 281 N.C. 108 , 187 S.E.2d 747, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1010 (1972).

IV.Branches of National Banks

State Laws Govern Branching of National Banks. —

The Comptroller of the Currency must look to State law to determine if a branch bank can be opened. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

National branch banking is limited to states the laws of which permit it, and even there only to the extent that the state laws permit branch banking. First Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 325 F. Supp. 523, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13740 (M.D.N.C.), aff'd, 448 F.2d 637, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8073 (4th Cir. 1971).

All statutory law requirements of the State dealing with the establishment of branch State banks must be complied with before a branch national bank can be lawfully approved by the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Camp, 281 F. Supp. 786, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10042 (E.D.N.C. 1968), aff'd, 409 F.2d 1086, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12979 (4th Cir. 1969).

The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States is bound by State law in considering the applications of national banks to establish branch banks. Citizens Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 329 F. Supp. 585, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12162 (M.D.N.C. 1971).

National Bank Branch Must Meet “Need and Convenience” Test. —

In accordance with subsection (b)(i) of this section, the Comptroller of the Currency must find that the establishment of a branch bank “will meet the needs and promote the convenience of the community.” First Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 448 F.2d 637, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8073 (4th Cir. 1971); State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.C. App. 183, 189 S.E.2d 496, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1856 (1972); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

And Solvency Test. —

The plain wording of subsection (b)(ii) of this section, which is the second part of the test made applicable to the Comptroller of the Currency by North Carolina law, indicates that a new bank branch and the existing bank or banks must meet the solvency test. The statute does not say that the new branch and the existing branch or branches in the area must meet the test. First Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 448 F.2d 637, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8073 (4th Cir. 1971); State ex rel. Banking Comm'n v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co., 15 N.C. App. 183, 189 S.E.2d 496, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1856 (1972); Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

Needs and Convenience of Community, Not Individuals, Considered. —

To show that the needs of a community will be met by a proposed branch bank does not require evidence from potential bank customers of their individual needs which existing banks are unwilling or unable to provide; rather, the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States is free to apply the expertise of his office to determine if the proposed branch will meet the needs and promote the convenience of the community to be served, and if his decision is supported by substantial evidence it will be sustained. Bank of New Bern v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 353 F. Supp. 643, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13199 (E.D.N.C. 1972).

Standard for Judicial Review of Informal Administrative Agency Action. —

The appropriate standard to be used by a federal district court in reviewing an administrative agency’s justification for informal action is not the substantial evidence test, which is appropriate when reviewing findings made on a hearing record, but rather whether the comptroller’s adjudication was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” Where a fact-finding hearing is held, clearly the standard of review is substantial evidence. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

If the Comptroller of the Currency followed the State law in determining if a branch bank could be opened, his decision must be affirmed unless it was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

The decision of the Comptroller of the Currency authorizing the opening of a branch bank must be affirmed unless it was arbitrary and capricious. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

Standard for Judicial Review of Fact-Gathering Hearing. —

Where a hearing on the establishment of a branch bank was held and the hearing was merely to gather facts, that is a fact-gathering procedure, the standard of review is the lesser arbitrary and capricious test. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Heimann, 452 F. Supp. 776, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17542 (M.D.N.C. 1978).

Sufficient Findings Must Be Approved Even If Late and Grudgingly Made. —

Where the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States has made, even though belated and grudgingly, legally sufficient findings and conclusions on the criteria prescribed by this section, and such findings are supported by substantial evidence, his action would be neither arbitrary nor capricious and must be approved. Citizens Nat'l Bank v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 329 F. Supp. 585, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12162 (M.D.N.C. 1971).

And Despite Avowed Intention Not to Comply with Section. —

Where the opinion of the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States took into account the factors required to be considered by this section, his findings sufficed to satisfy the requirements of this section, notwithstanding his avowed intention not to do so. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Southern Nat'l Bank, 329 F. Supp. 186, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12612 (E.D.N.C. 1971).

§ 53C-6-16. Change of location of a branch or principal office.

  1. A bank may change the location of its principal office or a branch with the prior written approval of the Commissioner. A request to relocate the principal office or a branch of a bank shall be made in a form acceptable to the Commissioner and shall include information regarding the reason for the proposed relocation, the distance and direction of the move, and such other information as the Commissioner may require in order to reach a decision in the matter.
  2. Not more than 30 days before nor less than 10 days after filing a request to relocate the principal office or a branch of a bank, the applicant shall publish public notice of the request. The public notice shall contain all of the following:
    1. A statement that the request has been filed with the Commissioner.
    2. The physical address of the principal office or branch to be relocated and the physical address of the proposed new location.
    3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the request to the Commissioner and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the date of publication of the public notice will be considered. The statement shall provide the then current mailing address of the Commissioner.
  3. The Commissioner shall approve a request to relocate the principal office or a branch of a bank if the relocation is to a site within the same vicinity as the original location, or does not result in a material change in the primary service area of the principal office or branch, or is considered important to the economic viability of the bank or the branch, or is otherwise found not to be inconsistent with the public need and convenience.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-17. Branch closings.

A bank may close a branch upon providing written notice to the Commissioner and the customers of the branch at least 90 days prior to the proposed closing. The notice shall include the date the branch will close and posting, in a conspicuous manner on the branch premises for a period of 30 days prior to the proposed closing date, a notice of its intent to close the branch. The consolidation of two or more branches into a single location in the same vicinity shall not be considered a closure subject to the 90-day and 30-day notice requirements of this section. To be considered a consolidation, the bank shall request consolidation treatment from the Commissioner, who shall decide, in his or her discretion, whether the branches to be consolidated are considered to be in the same vicinity, with due consideration to the distance between the branches and the nature of the market in which the branches are situated.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-18. Non-branch bank business offices.

  1. A bank may establish in this State or another state one or more non-branch bank business offices as defined by G.S. 53C-1-4(46), subject to the following requirements:
    1. If a proposed non-branch bank business office will be used in connection with a new activity for which an application is required under G.S. 53C-5-1(d) or an investment for which a notice is required under G.S. 53C-5-2(e), that application or notice shall include written notification of the intent to open the office. The notification shall include the proposed location of the office and a description of the business to be conducted at the office. If the Commissioner does not request additional information or object to its establishment within 10 days of the date of receipt of the notification, the non-branch bank business office shall be deemed approved. In deciding whether to object to the establishment of a non-branch bank business office, the Commissioner shall consider, without limitation, whether the business proposed to be conducted at the non-branch bank business office is permissible for a bank, the costs of its establishment and ongoing operation and the impact of the costs on the bank’s capital and profitability, and the ability of the bank’s management to conduct the proposed business.
    2. If written notification is not required under subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the bank shall provide the Commissioner with written notification of the location of the office and a description of the business to be conducted at the office.
  2. An out-of-state bank may establish and operate a non-branch bank business office in this State upon written notice to the Commissioner.
  3. A bank or an out-of-state bank may close a non-branch bank business office at any time with notice to the Commissioner.
  4. No deposits may be taken at a non-branch bank business office.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2017-165, s. 8.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 8, effective July 21, 2017, rewrote subsection (a).

§ 53C-6-19. Operations; suspension.

  1. A bank, any of its branches, and any of its non-branch bank business offices may operate on such days and during such hours, and may observe such holidays, as the bank’s board of directors shall designate.
  2. Whenever the Commissioner determines that an emergency exists or is pending in this State or any part thereof, the Commissioner may authorize banks operating in the affected area or areas to suspend any or all of their operations in such area or areas for such period or periods as the Commissioner establishes. An emergency is any condition or occurrence that may interfere with a bank’s operations or poses an existing or imminent threat to the safety or security of persons or property, or both.
  3. In the event that an emergency exists or is pending in this State or any part thereof and a bank operating in the affected area or areas is unable to communicate the existence or pendency of the emergency to the OCOB, an officer of the bank may suspend any or all of the bank’s operations in the affected area or areas without the prior approval of the Commissioner. The bank shall give notice of such closing to the Commissioner as soon as practicable.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-6-20. Savings promotion raffles.

A bank may offer a savings promotion raffle in which the sole consideration required for a chance of winning designated prizes is the deposit of a minimum specified amount of money in a savings account or other savings program offered by the bank. A bank shall maintain records sufficient to facilitate an audit of the savings promotion raffle, shall conduct the savings promotion raffle in a safe and sound manner, and shall fully disclose the terms and conditions of the promotion to account holders and prospective account holders of the bank.

History. 2019-173, s. 2(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-173, s. 2(e), made this section effective December 1, 2019, and applicable to raffles conducted on or after that date.

Article 7. Control Transactions; Combinations; Conversions.

Part 1. Change in Control.

§ 53C-7-101. Control transactions.

  1. Except as otherwise expressly permitted by this section, a person shall not engage in a control transaction, as defined by G.S. 53C-1-4(22), involving a bank without the prior approval of the Commissioner. A person may contract to engage in a control transaction with the consummation of such control transaction being subject to receipt of the approval of the Commissioner.
  2. The Commissioner may require a person who is obligated to file an application under this Part to appoint an agent resident in this State for service of process upon the filing of such notice or as a condition to the acceptance of such application for review. The application for approval shall be in a form required by the Commissioner and shall be accompanied by such fee as may be required by rule.
  3. The following transactions shall not constitute a control transaction requiring the prior approval of the Commissioner:
    1. The acquisition of control over voting securities in connection with securing, collecting, or satisfying a debt previously contracted for in good faith and not for the purpose of acquiring control of the bank, if the acquiring person files a notice with the Commissioner, in the form required by the Commissioner, describing such transaction at least 10 days before the acquiring person first votes or directs the voting of the voting securities.
    2. The acquisition of control over voting securities by a person who has previously engaged in a control transaction with respect to the bank after receiving the approval of the Commissioner under this Article, which approval permits the acquisition of control over additional voting securities, or any person who is an affiliate of the person previously engaging in the approved control transaction with the permission and who is identified in the application submitted for the approval, if the acquiring person files a notice with the Commissioner, in the form required by the Commissioner, describing the transaction at least 10 days before the acquiring person or affiliate thereof first votes or directs the voting of the voting securities.
    3. An acquisition of control over voting securities by operation of law, will, or intestate succession, if the acquiring person files a notice with the Commissioner, in the form required by the Commissioner, describing the acquisition or transfer at least 10 days before the acquiring person first votes or directs the voting of the voting securities.
    4. Bona fide gifts.
    5. A transaction exempted by rules, orders, or declaratory rulings of the Commissioner issued because approval of such a transaction is not necessary to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.

      (5a) An acquisition of control over voting shares exempt from the prior approval requirements set forth in section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. § 1842), pursuant to the exceptions described in items (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (a) of that section.

    6. An acquisition of control over voting securities in a transaction subject to approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. § 1842).
  4. Upon receipt of a notice described in subsection (c), the Commissioner may, before the 10th day following the receipt, notify the acquiring person of the Commissioner’s objection to the exercise of control over the voting securities or may require the acquiring party to submit further information before exercising control over the voting securities. An acquiring person receiving a notice of objection shall be required to submit an application for approval of a control transaction. An acquiring person receiving a notice to submit further information may be required to provide any information that would be included in an application for approval of a control transaction. In the event such an acquiring person is comprised of a group of persons, the Commissioner may require each member of the group to submit relevant information.
  5. All voting securities over which control has been acquired by an acquiring person shall not be voted on any matter submitted to a vote of the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the bank and shall be deemed authorized but unissued for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum of holders of voting securities until such time as follows:
    1. The Commissioner has approved an application for approval of a control transaction with respect to the voting securities.
    2. The transaction is one listed in subsection (c) of this section that does not require the filing of a notice with the Commissioner.
    3. The transaction is one listed in subsection (c) of this section that requires a notice to be filed with the Commissioner and the Commissioner has not issued an objection to the notice and any requirement of the Commissioner for the filing of further information has been determined by the Commissioner to have been satisfied.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 14.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 14, effective April 16, 2013, deleted the last sentence in subsection (a) which read: “Each bank shall report to the Commissioner any changes in its directors, president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief loan officer, or chief credit officer by the close of the second day on which the holding company is open for business following such change.”; and added subdivision (c)(5a).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Presumption of Approval of Transaction. —

Where under the provisions of this section a State bank transferred its assets to another State bank, the latter assuming the former’s liabilities under a consolidation agreement, it was presumed that the former Corporation Commission had notice or knowledge of the transaction coming within the scope of its duties, and had approved the transaction. Corporation Comm'n v. Stockholders, 199 N.C. 586 , 155 S.E. 445, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 187 (1930).

Right to Enforce Claim After Merger. —

In a bank merger, the surviving bank or its transferee has the legal right to enforce a claim because the surviving bank succeeds to the merged bank’s holder status by operation of law. Carolina First Nat'l Bank v. Douglas Gallery of Homes, Ltd., 68 N.C. App. 246, 314 S.E.2d 801, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3183 (1984).

§ 53C-7-102. Application regarding a control transaction.

  1. A person seeking approval of a control transaction involving a bank under this Article shall file the following with the Commissioner:
    1. An application in the form prescribed by the Commissioner.
    2. All filing fees required by a rule of the Commissioner.
    3. Such information as is required by a rule of the Commissioner or as is deemed by the Commissioner to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.
  2. In the event a person submitting an application is a group of persons, the Commissioner may require each member of the group to submit information relevant to the application.
  3. Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, information about the character, competence, or experience of an acquiring person or its proposed management personnel or affiliates shall be deemed a record of the Commissioner and subject to G.S. 53C-2-7(b) .

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 15.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 15, effective April 16, 2013, substituted “G.S. 53C-2-7(b)” for “G.S. 53C-2-8” in subsection (c).

§ 53C-7-103. Public notice.

A person filing an application for approval of a control application shall publish a public notice of the filing of the application not more than 30 days before nor more than 10 days after the filing of the application with the Commissioner. The public notice shall contain the following:

  1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
  2. The name of the applicable bank and the address of its principal office.
  3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the proposed control transaction and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the date of the publication of the public notice shall be considered. The public notice shall provide the current mailing address of the Commissioner.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-104. Actions on control transaction applications.

  1. The Commissioner shall examine the proposed control transaction, including the character, competence, and experience of the acquiring person and its proposed management personnel, to determine whether the interests of the customers and communities served by the bank would be adversely affected by the proposed control transaction. Not later than the 60th day following receipt of a completed application for approval of a control transaction, unless extraordinary circumstances require a longer period of review, the Commissioner shall approve or deny the application.
  2. The Commissioner may deny an application for approval of a control transaction for any of the following reasons:
    1. The financial condition of the person seeking approval of a control transaction could jeopardize the financial stability of the bank or the financial interests of its customers.
    2. An examination of the character, competence, and experience of any acquiring person or of any of the proposed management personnel shows that it would not be in the interest of the depositors of the bank, or in the interest of the public, to permit the person to control the bank.
    3. The plans or proposals of the person seeking approval with respect to exercising control over the bank would not be in the best interests of the bank’s customers.
    4. Upon the effective date of such proposed control transaction, the bank would not be solvent, have inadequate capital, or not be in compliance with this Chapter or rules of the Commissioner.
    5. The application for approval is incomplete.
    6. If the acquiring person solicits votes for the approval of or consents to the control transaction from the holders of the voting securities of the bank, adequate and complete disclosures of all material information about the proposed control transaction, together with a prominent statement that neither the control transaction nor any solicitation of the holders’ votes or consents have been approved by the Commissioner and that any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense, have not been made to the holders.
  3. If an application filed under this Part is approved by the Commissioner, the control transaction may become effective. All conditions to approval set forth in the order of the Commissioner shall be enforceable against the person, and each member of a group of persons, receiving the approval.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-105. Appeal.

Any order of the Commissioner denying an application for approval of a control transaction may be appealed to the Commission by the person filing the application denied, as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 2. Combinations.

§ 53C-7-201. Combination authority.

With the approval of the Commissioner, a bank may combine with one or more depository institutions or non-depository institutions, provided that the bank is the surviving entity in any combination with a non-depository institution. The application for approval shall be in the form required by the Commissioner and shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth by rule.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-202. Combination application and investigation.

  1. A bank seeking approval of a combination shall file with the Commissioner an application for approval, copies of the agreement under which the bank proposes to effect the combination, and such additional information as the Commissioner shall require by rule or as is required by the Commissioner in connection with the application in order to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.
  2. A bank filing an application for approval of a combination shall publish a public notice of the filing of the application not more than 30 days before nor more than 10 days after the filing of the application with the Commissioner. The public notice shall contain the following:
    1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
    2. The names of the parties to the proposed combination and the addresses of their principal offices.
    3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the proposed combination and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the date of the publication of the public notice shall be considered. The public notice shall contain the current mailing address of the Commissioner.
  3. The Commissioner shall examine the proposed combination, including the character, competency, and experience of the proposed directors and executive officers of the surviving party of the combination, to determine whether the interests of the customers of and communities served by the parties to the combination would be adversely affected by the proposed combination.
  4. Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, information about the character, competence, or experience of the directors and executive officers of the parties to a combination received by the Commissioner shall be subject to G.S. 53C-2-7(b) .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-203. Decision on application.

Based on the application and the Commissioner’s examination, the Commissioner shall enter an order approving or denying approval of the proposed combination not later than the 60th day following the date the Commissioner notifies the parties that the application is complete, unless extraordinary circumstances require a longer period of review.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-204. Interim banks.

The Commissioner may approve an application to organize an interim bank solely for the purpose of effecting a combination under this Article. No interim bank shall transact any business except as is incidental and necessary to its organization and the combination. The Commissioner may set forth in the order approving the organization such additional conditions with respect to the interim bank as the Commissioner deems necessary.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-205. Fiduciary powers and liabilities in a combination or a transferring of assets and liabilities.

Whenever any depository institution or any trust institution shall combine with or shall sell to and transfer its assets and liabilities to any other depository institution, trust institution, or other company, as provided by the laws of this State or the United States, all the then existing fiduciary rights, powers, duties, and liabilities of the combining or transferring institution, including the rights, powers, duties, and liabilities as executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, and/or any other fiduciary capacity, whether under appointment by order of court, will, deed, or other instrument, shall, upon the effective date of the combination or sale and transfer, vest in, devolve upon, and thereafter be performed by the surviving or transferee company, and such latter institution shall be deemed substituted for and shall have all the rights and powers of the transferring institution.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 16.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 16, effective April 16, 2013, substituted “in a combination or a transferring of” for “of North Carolina financial institutions combining or transferring” in the section heading; and substituted “depository” for “North Carolina financial,” “any trust” for “federally chartered” and “depository institution” for “bank,” deleted “doing business in this State” preceding “shall combine with” and “savings institution,” following the second occurrence of “trust institution,” and added “or” preceding “transferring institution, including.”

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Some of the cases cited below were decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Standing to Seek Stay Relief. —

Bank’s motion for stay relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d) was granted over a Chapter 7 trustee’s objection on the basis of lack of standing, as the bank presented the original note at the hearing, G.S. 25-3-301 , and it acquired the original mortgagee’s interest in the note by merger and thus, had standing to enforce the note under G.S. 53C-7-205 . A notation in the deed of trust that made the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) a beneficiary (as nominee for the lender and assigns) did not change the fact that the bank was entitled to enforce the note and deed of trust, meaning that it had a colorable claim to the property. In re Sears, 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2010 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. May 16, 2013).

Distinction is drawn between “consolidation” and “merger.” Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

Consolidated Bank Succeeds to Power as Trustee Under Deed of Trust. —

A bank, created as a result of a consolidation of several State banks, may properly exercise the power of sale contained in a deed of trust in which one of its constituent banks was named trustee, upon default by the trustor, since under this section the consolidated bank succeeds to such power. Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

Successor by Merger. —

Petitioner was the holder of a note as it had physical possession of the note at the hearing and submitted a copy of that note, and a Non-Home Loan Certificate that stated that petitioner was successor by merger to the mortgagee was not challenged; because of the merger, petitioner had all the rights and powers the mortgagee had before the merger under G.S. 53-17 [now repealed]. As the mortgagee was the indorser of the note in blank, petitioner received those rights in the merger. In re Yopp, 217 N.C. App. 488, 720 S.E.2d 769, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2609 (2011).

Retroactive Application of Section. —

This section, although in form an independent statute, is in reality an amendment of Public Laws 1925, c. 77, codified as G.S. 53-15 (now repealed) and former G.S. 55-165 through 55-170, and is therefore applicable to a deed of trust executed prior to the enactment of this section and subsequent to the effective date of the 1925 act. Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

§ 53C-7-206. Combination with federally chartered institution.

A combination by a bank with a federally chartered institution in which the federally chartered institution will be the surviving party shall be subject to approval by the chartering authority of the federally chartered institution in accordance with the laws of the United States.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-207. Combination with a nonbank subsidiary.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, a bank proposing to do any of the following combinations shall give prior written notice to the Commissioner that provides the details of the proposed combination that are required by the Commissioner:
    1. Combine with a nonbank subsidiary, if the bank is the resulting entity of the combination.
    2. Combine a nonbank subsidiary with another company that is not a depository institution, if the nonbank subsidiary is the resulting entity.
    3. Combine two or more nonbank subsidiaries of two or more banks under common control of the same holding company.Unless the Commissioner, within 30 days of receiving the notice, notifies the bank or subsidiary that the Commissioner objects to the proposed combination, the bank or subsidiary may complete the combination. However, the Commissioner may extend the period to object to the proposed combination if the Commissioner determines that it raises issues that require additional information or additional time for analysis. While the objection period is so extended, the bank or subsidiary may not proceed with respect to the proposed combination.
  2. A bank may, pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 , appeal an objection by the Commissioner.
  3. The prior written notice requirement of subsection (a) of this section is not required (i) for a combination of a nonbank subsidiary and another company that is not a depository institution, provided the nonbank subsidiary is not the resulting entity, (ii) for a combination of two or more nonbank subsidiaries of the same bank, each of which shall be effected in accordance with applicable organizational law, or (iii) if all of the following apply:
    1. The bank is well-capitalized and well-managed as demonstrated by the supervisory rating it received during its most recent examination.
    2. The nonbank subsidiary with which the combination is to be made engages in either of the following activities:
      1. One in which the bank is then engaged or has previously been engaged, directly or through a different subsidiary, and for which all necessary approvals of bank supervisory agencies and of the Commissioner have previously been obtained and remain in effect.
      2. One for which no prior notice or application for approval to any federal bank supervisory authority is required.
    3. The bank notifies the Commissioner in writing of the combination within 30 days thereafter.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 17; 2017-165, s. 9.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 17, effective April 16, 2013, rewrote the section.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 9, effective July 21, 2017, in the introductory paragraph of subsection (a), substituted “provides the details” for “provides such detail” and substituted “are required by the Commissioner” for “the Commissioner may require”; inserted “nonbank” in subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(3) and in subdivision (c)(2); in subdivision (a)(2), substituted “company that is not a depository institution” for “company”, and made a related stylistic change; and rewrote subsection (c).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 2 (G.S. 53-2 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Distinction is drawn between “consolidation” and “merger.” Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

Consolidated Bank Succeeds to Power as Trustee Under Deed of Trust. —

A bank, created as a result of a consolidation of several State banks, may properly exercise the power of sale contained in a deed of trust in which one of its constituent banks was named trustee, upon default by the trustor, since under this section the consolidated bank succeeds to such power. Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

Successor by Merger. —

Petitioner was the holder of a note as it had physical possession of the note at the hearing and submitted a copy of that note, and a Non-Home Loan Certificate that stated that petitioner was successor by merger to the mortgagee was not challenged; because of the merger, petitioner had all the rights and powers the mortgagee had before the merger under G.S. 53-17 [now repealed]. As the mortgagee was the indorser of the note in blank, petitioner received those rights in the merger. In re Yopp, 217 N.C. App. 488, 720 S.E.2d 769, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2609 (2011).

Retroactive Application of Section. —

This section, although in form an independent statute, is in reality an amendment of Public Laws 1925, c. 77, codified as G.S. 53-15 (now repealed) and former G.S. 55-165 through 55-170, and is therefore applicable to a deed of trust executed prior to the enactment of this section and subsequent to the effective date of the 1925 act. Braak v. Hobbs, 210 N.C. 379 , 186 S.E. 500, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 105 (1936).

§ 53C-7-208. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2013-29, s. 18, effective April 16, 2013.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; repealed by 2013-29, s. 18, effective April 16, 2013.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 53C-7-208 pertained to fiduciary powers and liabilities of combining banks.

§ 53C-7-209. Appeal.

Any order of the Commissioner denying an application for approval of a combination may be appealed to the Commission by a party to the combination as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 3. Charter Conversion.

§ 53C-7-301. Conversion to a North Carolina bank charter.

  1. Any depository institution that is not a bank may apply to the Commissioner for permission to convert into a bank and for certification of related amendments to its organizational documents necessary to effect the conversion. The application for approval shall be in the form required by the Commissioner and shall be accompanied by a fee as set forth by rule.
  2. A plan of conversion shall be submitted as a part of the application filed with the Commissioner. The Commissioner may require amendment of the plan.
  3. The Commissioner shall approve the plan of conversion, as amended if applicable, if upon examination the Commissioner finds the following:
    1. The resulting bank will commence operations in a safe, sound, and prudent manner with adequate capital, liquidity, reserves, asset composition, and earnings prospects.
    2. The directors and officers of the converting institution are qualified by character, competency, and experience to control and operate the resulting bank in a legal and proper manner.
    3. The interests of the converting institution’s customers, creditors, and shareholders will not be materially and adversely affected by the proposed conversion.
    4. The plan of conversion is not in violation of the converting institution’s applicable organizational law.
    5. Adequate written disclosure of the material terms of the plan of conversion and other relevant material information has been or will be made to the converting institution’s equity ownership interest holders as required by the converting institution’s organizational law, including a statement in any such written disclosure that any materials used to solicit the votes of the holders have not been approved by the Commission or the Commissioner and that any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
  4. Following approval of the plan of conversion, the Commissioner shall supervise and monitor the conversion process in order to determine compliance by the converting institution with the plan of conversion and applicable law.
  5. The Commissioner shall authorize by order the consummation of the conversion, issue a charter, and permit the converting institution to file with the Secretary of State and other public officials such documents as are necessary to effect the conversion when the Commissioner determines the conversion process complied with the organizational law applicable to the converting institution and the plan of conversion was approved, if required by applicable organizational law, by such vote of the converting institution’s equity ownership interest holders as is required under the organizational law.
  6. The Commissioner may provide in the order authorizing the consummation of conversion for the resulting bank to do the following:
    1. Wind up any activities legally engaged in by the converting institution at the time of conversion but not permitted to banks.
    2. Return any assets and deposit liabilities legally held by the converting institution at the time of the conversion but not permitted to be held by banks.The length, terms, and conditions of the transitional periods described in this subsection shall be subject to the discretion of the Commissioner.
  7. Upon the effective date of the conversion, the converting institution shall continue in existence as a bank, and all rights, liabilities, and obligations of whatever kind of the converting institution shall continue and remain in its new form of organization. Except as may be authorized by the Commissioner pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, the bank shall have only those rights, powers, and duties authorized for or imposed upon banks by the laws of this State and the United States. All actions and proceedings to which the converting institution was party prior to conversion shall be unaffected by the conversion and shall proceed as if the conversion had not been effected.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-302. Appeal.

Any order of the Commissioner denying an application for approval of a conversion to a bank may be appealed to the Commission by the party filing the application as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-7-303. Conversion by North Carolina bank.

  1. A bank may convert to another form of depository institution under the laws of this State, of another state, or the United States in accordance with applicable law.
  2. Upon the effective date of the conversion, the depository institution shall notify the Commissioner of the effective date and file with the Commissioner a copy of its authorization to operate as a depository institution certified by the applicable federal regulator or financial institution regulator.
  3. Upon the effective date of the conversion, the resulting depository institution shall cease to be a bank.
  4. Upon the effective date of the conversion, all rights, liabilities, and obligations of whatever kind of the bank shall continue and remain in its new form of organization as a depository institution organized under the laws of this State, another state, or the United States. All actions and proceedings to which the bank was party prior to conversion shall be unaffected by the conversion and shall proceed as if the conversion had not been effected.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Article 8. Bank Supervision.

§ 53C-8-1. Commissioner has authority to supervise banks.

  1. Every bank shall be under the supervision of the Commissioner. It shall be the Commissioner’s duty to enforce the banking laws through the employees and agents of the OCOB. All banks shall conduct their business in a manner consistent with the banking laws.
  2. The Commissioner may enter into written agreements, cease and desist order stipulations, cease and desist orders, consent orders, and similar arrangements with banks and their holding companies, or either of them; may request resolutions be approved by boards of directors of banks and their holding companies, or either of them; and may take other similar corrective actions.
  3. Upon written request, the Commissioner may, notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, issue letters of interpretation, advisory opinions, or written guidance on any laws under the Commissioner’s jurisdiction, provided that the interpretations, opinions, and guidance shall not have the force and effect of rules of law.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “After Goeller v. United States, Can the Theft Loss Treatment Now Be Applied to Investments When Corporate Deception is Present?,” see 38 Campbell L. Rev. 1 (2016).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 3 (G.S. 53-18 et seq.) and former Article 10 (G.S. 53-124 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Approval of Stockholders Not Necessary for Sale of Assets. —

For a valid sale of assets to another bank the approval of the stockholders of the selling bank is not required by this section, and the section is not invalid for that reason. Planters' Sav. Bank v. Earley, 204 N.C. 297 , 168 S.E. 225, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 384 (1933).

As to enforcement of former statutory liability of stockholders by purchasing bank, see Peoples Bank & Trust Co. ex rel. Wayne Nat'l Bank v. Roscower, 199 N.C. 653 , 155 S.E. 560, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 208 (1930).

“Insolvent” Defined. —

The word “insolvent,” in this section, means when the bank cannot meet its depository liabilities in due course, and does not require that the condition of the bank should at the time be such as to enable it at any given time to pay all of its depositors in full at the time on demand. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

A bank is insolvent, within the meaning of this section, when the actual cash market value of its assets is not sufficient to pay its liabilities to its depositors and other creditors. State v. Brewer, 202 N.C. 187 , 162 S.E. 363, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 458 (1932).

“Knowledge” Defined. —

The word “knowledge,” as used in the statute, is to be taken in its ordinary sense and according to its usual significance or acceptation. It means an impression of the mind, the state of being aware; and this may be acquired in numerous ways and from many sources. It is usually obtained from a variety of facts and circumstances. Generally speaking, when it is said a person has knowledge of a given condition, it is meant that his relation to it, his association with it, his control over it, and his direction of it are such as to give him actual information concerning it. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

Who May Bring Action for Civil Liability. —

A violation of this section by an employee, or by officers and directors of a bank, resulting in damages to a depositor, is a wrong to the depositor; he and not the bank or its receiver is entitled to maintain an action to recover the damages resulting from such wrong. See Townsend v. Williams, 117 N.C. 330 , 23 S.E. 461, 1895 N.C. LEXIS 66 (1895); Tate v. Bates, 118 N.C. 287 , 24 S.E. 482, 1896 N.C. LEXIS 49 (1896); Solomon v. Bates, 118 N.C. 311 , 24 S.E. 478, 1896 N.C. LEXIS 50 (1896); Houston v. Thornton, 122 N.C. 365 , 29 S.E. 827, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 264 (1898); State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924); Russell v. Boone, 188 N.C. 830 , 125 S.E. 926, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 215 (1924); Bane v. Powell, 192 N.C. 387 , 135 S.E. 118, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 301 (1926).

A depositor in a bank, who has sustained damages, peculiar to himself, by the wrongful act of the officers and directors of the bank, has a right to recover damages in an action brought by him against the officers and directors. Douglass v. Dawson, 190 N.C. 458 , 130 S.E. 195, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 101 (1925); Bane v. Powell, 192 N.C. 387 , 135 S.E. 118, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 301 (1926).

Liability Not Bank Asset. —

Sums for which bank officers and directors are liable for receiving or permitting receipt of deposit with knowledge of bank’s insolvency, contrary to this section, are not assets of the bank. The wrong being only to the depositor, he need not allege, to maintain an action, that bank’s receiver refused to sue on demand. Bane v. Powell, 192 N.C. 387 , 135 S.E. 118, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 301 (1926).

Elements of Offense. —

In order for a conviction under the provisions of this section, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the actual receipt of the deposits by defendant officer of the bank at the time when the bank was insolvent to his own knowledge, or that such officer permitted an employee of the bank to receive the deposits with knowledge of these facts. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

Necessary Allegations. —

In order for a depositor to maintain an action against the individual officers of an insolvent bank for permitting the deposits to be received it is necessary, among other things, to allege and prove the insolvency of the bank at the time the deposits were made, and the allegation that is was either insolvent then or the misconduct of the officials afterwards caused its insolvency, is insufficient, the alternative of the allegation being a wrong to the bank itself which may be sued upon by its receiver afterwards. Wall v. Howard, 194 N.C. 310 , 139 S.E. 449, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 80 (1927).

Evidence of Value of Assets and Property. —

For the purpose of ascertaining the solvency or insolvency of a bank, it is permissible to go into an investigation of its assets and property as of the date when the deposit was made, and, of course, their value after that, or at the time of the trial, is competent as illustrating or bearing upon their worth at the time the deposit was charged to have been received. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

Evidence of Admissions of Knowledge of Insolvency. —

Upon the trial of an officer of an insolvent bank under this section, the officer’s admissions that he knew of the insolvency of the bank at the time in question with his explanation thereof is competent testimony. State v. Brewer, 202 N.C. 187 , 162 S.E. 363, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 458 (1932).

Bank Examiner as Expert Witness. —

In an action to convict an officer of a bank under this section, the testimony of the State bank examiner is to be received as that of an expert upon the question of the bank’s insolvency. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

Certified Accountant as Witness. —

Upon the trial of a bank official under the provisions of this section, testimony of a certified public accountant who had had experience in such matters and who had examined the books of the bank and had obtained from the directors, collectively and individually, information as to the value of its assets including lands and collateral, that the bank was insolvent at the time in question is not objectionable. State v. Brewer, 202 N.C. 187 , 162 S.E. 363, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 458 (1932).

Sufficiency of Expert Opinion Evidence as to Insolvency. —

Where the State bank examiner and another expert have been permitted to give their testimony as to the bank’s insolvency at the time of the crime, upon their investigation, without stating the basis of their opinions thereon, it may not be decided as a matter of law, upon conflicting evidence, that the defendant must have known of the insolvent condition testified to by the experts. State v. Hightower, 187 N.C. 300 , 121 S.E. 616, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 274 (1924).

Loans in Violation of G.S. 53-48 or G.S. 53-111 [now repealed]. —

Under this section as it read prior to amendment by Session Laws 1993, c. 539, s. 424, the unlawful act of making loans in violation of G.S. 53-48 [now repealed] or G.S. 53-111 [now repealed] was made a misdemeanor punishable as such at the discretion of the court. State v. Cooper, 190 N.C. 528 , 130 S.E. 180 (1925). See notes to §§ 53-48 and 53-111 .

§ 53C-8-2. Assessments and fees.

Banks shall pay the following assessments and fees into the OCOB within 10 days after receipt of an invoice:

  1. Annual assessments. —  Each bank shall pay a cumulative assessment based on its total assets as shown on its report of condition made to the Commissioner as of December 31 each year or the date most nearly approximating the same, not to exceed the amount determined by applying the following schedule:
    1. On the first fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) of assets, or fraction thereof, ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
    2. On assets greater than fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) but not more than two hundred fifty million dollars ($250,000,000), fourteen dollars ($14.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or fraction thereof.
    3. On assets greater than two hundred fifty million dollars ($250,000,000), but not more than five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000), eleven dollars ($11.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or fraction thereof.
    4. On assets greater than five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000), but not more than one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000), seven dollars ($7.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or fraction thereof.
    5. On assets greater than one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000), but not more than ten billion dollars ($10,000,000,000), four dollars ($4.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or fraction thereof.
    6. On assets greater than ten billion dollars ($10,000,000,000), two dollars ($2.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or fraction thereof.
  2. Assessments on trust assets. —  Each bank shall pay an assessment on trust assets held by it in the amount of one dollar ($1.00) per hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of trust assets, or fraction thereof, except that banks are not required to pay assessments on real estate held as trust assets.
  3. Special assessments. —  If the Commissioner determines that the financial condition or manner of operation of a bank warrants further examination or an increased level of supervision, or in the event of a combination or conversion, the Commissioner may charge, and the institutions shall pay, an assessment equal to the reasonable cost of further examination, increased level of supervision, or supervision with regard to the combination or conversion. The Commissioner’s determination of the cost of further examination shall be, in the absence of manifest error, dispositive of the issue of reasonableness.
  4. In the first half of each calendar year, the Commission shall review the estimated cost of maintaining each division of the OCOB for the next fiscal year. If the estimated assessments provided for under this Chapter for any division shall exceed the estimated cost of maintaining that division for the next fiscal year, then the Commission may reduce by a uniform percentage any assessments provided for in this Chapter for that division. If the estimated assessments provided for in this Chapter for any division shall be less than the estimated cost of maintaining that division for the next fiscal year, then the Commission may increase by a uniform percentage any assessments provided for in this Chapter for that division to an amount that will increase the amount of assessments to be collected to an amount at least equal to the estimated cost of maintaining that division of the OCOB for the next fiscal year.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-3. Reports required of banks.

  1. Each bank shall file the following with the Commissioner, at such times, on such forms, and in such formats as the Commissioner may require:
    1. Annual reports of conditions.
    2. Periodic reports for interim periods within a year, not less than monthly in any case.
  2. In addition to the reports filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, each bank shall provide to the Commissioner copies of all applications and reports of condition filed by it under applicable federal law contemporaneously with the filing of such application and reports by the bank with its primary federal regulator.
  3. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to limit the authority of the Commissioner to request and obtain other information that the Commissioner may deem necessary to discharge the duties of the Commissioner under this Chapter.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-4. Examination by Commissioner.

  1. The Commissioner may examine everything relating to the business of a bank or its holding company, and may appoint examiners to make such examination. The examiners shall file with the Commissioner a full report of the findings resulting from the examination, including any violation of law or any unauthorized or unsafe practices of the bank or the holding company disclosed by the examination.
  2. Examinations under subsection (a) of this section shall be conducted pursuant to practices and procedures established by the OCOB, provided the Commissioner may take into consideration the guidelines and requirements for such activity of the primary federal supervisor of the bank or holding company.
  3. The Commissioner shall furnish a copy of the report of examination to the bank or the holding company examined and may, upon request, furnish a copy of the report to the primary federal regulator of the bank or its holding company and to the FDIC if not the bank’s primary federal regulator.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-5. Examination of affiliates.

The Commissioner, at his or her discretion, may examine the affiliates of a bank to the extent it is necessary to safeguard the interest of depositors and creditors of the bank and of the general public, and to enforce the provisions of this Chapter. The Commissioner may conduct the examination in conjunction with any examination of the bank or an affiliate thereof conducted by any other state or federal regulatory authority.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-6. Access to books and records; right to issue subpoenas, administer oaths, and examine witnesses.

  1. The Commissioner and the Commissioner’s examiners and agents:
    1. Shall have free access to all books and records of a bank, its holding company, and their affiliates that relate to the business of the bank or the holding company, and the books and records kept by an officer, agent, or employee of the bank or holding company relating to or upon which any record is kept.
    2. May subpoena witnesses and administer oaths or affirmations in the examination of any director, officer, agent, or employee of the bank, its holding company, or their affiliates or of any other person in relation to affairs, transactions, and conditions of the bank, its holding company, or their affiliates.
    3. May require the production of the records, books, papers, contracts, and other documents of a bank, its holding company, and their affiliates.
    4. May order that improper entries be corrected on the books and records of a bank, its holding company, and the bank’s affiliates.
  2. The Commissioner may issue subpoenas duces tecum.
  3. If a person fails to comply with a subpoena so issued or a party or witness refuses to testify on any matters, a court of competent jurisdiction, on the application of the Commissioner, may compel compliance by proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of the requirements of a subpoena issued from the court or a refusal to testify in the court.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-7. Examiner making false report.

If any bank examiner shall knowingly and willfully make any false or fraudulent report of the condition of any bank that the examiner has examined with the intent to aid or abet the bank or its affiliates in committing violations of any provision of this Chapter, or if any examiner shall keep or accept any bribe or gratuity given for the purpose of inducing the examiner not to file any report of examination of any bank, or if any examiner shall neglect to make an examination of any bank by reason of having received or accepted any bribe or gratuity, the examiner shall be guilty of a Class H felony.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-8. Examiner disclosing confidential information.

If any examiner or other employee of the OCOB fails to keep secret the facts and information obtained in the course of an examination of a bank except as permitted or required by this Chapter, the examiner shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-9. Loans or gratuities forbidden.

  1. No bank, or any officer, director, employee, or affiliate thereof, shall make an extension of credit or grant any gratuity to the Commissioner, any deputy commissioner, or any bank examiner. Any person violating this provision shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and may be fined a sum equal to the amount of the extension made or the gratuity given. If the Commissioner, any deputy commissioner, or any bank examiner accepts an extension of credit or gratuity from any bank, or from any officer, director, employee, or affiliate thereof, that individual shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and may be fined a sum equal to the extension of credit made or the gratuity given.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, the Commissioner may exempt from the application of subsection (a) any deputy commissioner or any bank examiner with respect to any extension of credit existing upon the hiring of the deputy commissioner or bank examiner by the OCOB and any extension of the term or renewal of such extension of credit made thereafter, so long as the extension of term or renewal has terms and conditions generally available to customers of the applicable bank having generally the same creditworthiness as the deputy commissioner or bank examiner.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-10. Willfully and maliciously making derogatory reports.

Any person who shall willfully and maliciously make, circulate, transmit, or otherwise communicate any statement, rumor, or suggestion to one or more other persons that is directly or by inference false and derogatory to the financial condition, or affects the solvency or financial standing, of any bank, or who shall counsel, aid, procure, or induce another to make, circulate, transmit, or otherwise communicate any such statement or rumor, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-11. Misapplication, embezzlement of funds.

  1. Any person who, with intent to defraud or injure a bank or any other person or with intent to deceive an officer of the bank or an employee of the OCOB appointed to examine the affairs of the bank, commits any of the following acts shall be guilty of a felony:
    1. Embezzles, converts, or misapplies any of the money, funds, credit, or property of the bank, whether owned by it or held in trust.
    2. Issues or puts forth a certificate of deposit; draws an order or bill of exchange; makes an acceptance; assigns a note, bond, draft, bill of exchange, mortgage, judgment, or decree; or fictitiously borrows or solicits, obtains, or receives money for a bank not in good faith.
    3. Makes or permits to be made a false entry in a record of a bank, or conceals or permits to be concealed, by any means or manner, the true and correct entries in a record of a bank.
    4. Knowingly makes an extension of credit, or permits an extension of credit, by a bank to any insolvent person or to a person who has ceased to exist, or that never had any existence, or upon collateral consisting of stocks or bonds of an insolvent or nonexistent person.
    5. Makes or publishes, or knowingly permits to be made or published, a false report, statement, or certificate as to the true financial condition of a bank.
  2. If an offense committed under this section involves money, funds, credit, or property with a value of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, it is a Class C felony. If an offense committed under this section involves money, funds, credit, or property with a value of less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), it is a Class H felony.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 10 (G.S. 53-124 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Intent and purpose of this section is to prevent the deception of the officers of a bank or the depletion of its assets or injury of its business by falsification of the bank’s books by its officers or employees, and an indictment for the offense is not sufficient which merely charges such falsification without showing that the false entries were material or affected the interests of the bank or deceived its officers. State v. Cole, 202 N.C. 592 , 163 S.E. 594, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 163 (1932).

G.S. 14-254 Not in Conflict. —

G.S. 14-254 , making it a criminal offense for the cashier or certain other officers, agents and employees of a bank to be guilty of malfeasance in the respects therein enumerated, making the intent necessary for a conviction, is not in conflict with this section as passed in 1921. State v. Switzer, 187 N.C. 88 , 121 S.E. 43, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 237 (1924).

“Abstract” Construed. —

The legal meaning of the word “abstract,” as it appears in G.S. 14-254 , with reference to the unlawful use of the funds of the bank, is correctly charged under an instruction to the jury defining it as the taking from or withdrawing from the bank, with the intent to injure or defraud. State v. Switzer, 187 N.C. 88 , 121 S.E. 43, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 237 (1924).

“Embezzle” means to misappropriate as well as to convert to one’s own use. State v. Maslin, 195 N.C. 537 , 143 S.E. 3, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 140 (1928).

Specific intent to deceive or to defraud is not necessary to a conviction of a bank officer or employee of making false entries on the books of the bank under the provisions of this section, it being sufficient if the defendant willfully made such false entries, the performance of the act expressly forbidden by statute constituting an offense in itself without regard to the question of specific intent. State v. Lattimore, 201 N.C. 32 , 158 S.E. 741, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 172 (1931).

Indictment Charging Conspiracy to Violate Section. —

It is not necessary for an indictment, charging a conspiracy to violate the provisions of this section, to allege that all of the defendants were officers or employees of the bank, the indictment being sufficient if it alleges that some of the defendants were officers or employees of the bank and that the other defendants conspired with them to do the unlawful act. State v. Davis, 203 N.C. 35 , 164 S.E. 737, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 302 (1932).

Alleging Corporation Is a Bank. —

Where the indictment charges the employee with making false entries upon the books of the bank in which he was employed, and that it was a corporation existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, it is not defective for failing to particularize that it was a bank, within the contemplation of the statute under which the indictment had been drawn. State v. Hedgecock, 185 N.C. 714 , 117 S.E. 47, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 149 (1923).

Sufficiency of Indictment. —

In a prosecution under this section and G.S. 14-254 it was not necessary to aver or to prove that the money or funds had been committed by the bank to the custody of the defendant or that there had been any breach of trust or confidence except that which arose out of the relation between the bank and the defendant. Nor was it necessary to charge in the very words that the defendant had converted the property to his own use. The words “did embezzle” sufficiently indicated the criminal act. The intent to defraud was sufficiently set out, under G.S. 15-151 , without specifically naming any particular victim of the preconceived purpose. And the indictment was sufficient though there was nothing to indicate the number of abstractions, if more than one. State v. Maslin, 195 N.C. 537 , 143 S.E. 3, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 140 (1928).

Variance as to Some Items. —

In a prosecution of an officer of a bank for publishing a false report of the bank’s condition in violation of this section, a variance between the allegations and proof as to some of the items of the report will not be fatal when there is no variance with respect to all the items, it being sufficient for conviction if the report as published was false in any particular as alleged in the indictment and was published with knowledge of such falsity and with a wrongful or unlawful intent. State v. Davis, 203 N.C. 47 , 164 S.E. 732, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 304 , cert. denied, 287 U.S. 645, 53 S. Ct. 91, 77 L. Ed. 558, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 323 (1932).

Expert Evidence as to Book Entries. —

In a prosecution under this section and G.S. 14-254 expert parol evidence may be properly admitted to trace book entries, without contradicting them, so as to show that the officer of the bank had embezzled the bank’s funds held in trust, as charged in the bill of indictment. In such case there was no invasion of the province of the jury by the expression of an opinion upon a fact in issue. State v. Maslin, 195 N.C. 537 , 143 S.E. 3, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 140 (1928).

Instruction That Willfulness Must Be Shown Is Not Error. —

In a prosecution under this section for willfully making false entries on the books of a bank, an instruction which was intended to stress and in effect did stress the necessity of proving that the false entries were willfully and not inadvertently made, will not be held for error. State v. Lattimore, 201 N.C. 32 , 158 S.E. 741, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 172 (1931).

Conviction of Depositor. —

In order to convict a depositor of a bank who has abstracted funds from the bank in collusion with its cashier, it is not required that he himself was an officer of the bank or that he was present at the time the money was feloniously “abstracted,” under the provisions of G.S. 14-254 , and he may be convicted thereunder when the bill of indictment substantially follows the language of the statute and the evidence is sufficient to sustain the charge therein. This is not applicable to the provisions of this section as passed in 1921. State v. Switzer, 187 N.C. 88 , 121 S.E. 43, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 237 (1924).

Though the depositor was not present at the time the offense was committed, he may be convicted as a principal under the counts of the indictment so charging the offense. State v. Switzer, 187 N.C. 88 , 121 S.E. 43, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 237 (1924).

§ 53C-8-12. Enforcement of the banking laws.

  1. When the Commissioner believes that a violation of the banking laws has occurred or is continuing, the Commissioner may order an examination or investigation of the facts and circumstances relating to the suspected violation.
  2. Every bank failing to make and transmit any report that the Commissioner is authorized to require by this Chapter, and in and according to the form prescribed by the Commissioner, within 10 business days after the receipt of a request or requisition therefor, or within the extension of time granted by the Commissioner, shall be notified by the Commissioner, and if the failure continues for five business days after the receipt of the notice, the delinquent bank shall be subject to a penalty of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000). The penalty provided by this section shall be recovered in a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction, and it shall be the duty of the Attorney General to prosecute all such actions.
  3. In addition to any other powers conferred by this Chapter, the Commissioner shall have the power to do the following:
    1. Order any bank, trust company, or subsidiary thereof, or any director, officer, or employee, or any other person the Commissioner is authorized to regulate, to cease and desist violating any provision of this Chapter or any lawful rule issued thereunder.
    2. Order any bank, trust company, or subsidiary thereof, or any director, officer, or employee, or any other person the Commissioner is authorized to regulate, to cease and desist from a course of conduct that is unsafe or unsound and that is likely to cause insolvency or dissipation of assets or is likely to jeopardize or otherwise seriously prejudice the interests of a depositor.
  4. Consistent with Article 3A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes, notice and opportunity for hearing shall be provided before any of the actions authorized by this section shall be undertaken by the Commissioner. In cases involving extraordinary circumstances requiring immediate action, the Commissioner may take such action but shall promptly afford a subsequent hearing upon application to rescind the action taken.
  5. The Commissioner shall have the power to subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, require the production of evidence, administer oaths, and examine any person under oath in connection with any subject related to a duty imposed or a power vested in the Commissioner.
  6. The Commissioner may impose a civil money penalty of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation by any bank, trust company, or subsidiary thereof, or any director, officer, or employee, or any other person the Commissioner is authorized to regulate, of an order issued under subdivision (1) of subsection (c) of this section. The Commissioner may impose a civil money penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day for each day that a bank, trust company, or subsidiary thereof, or any director, officer, or employee, or any other person the Commissioner is authorized to regulate, violates a cease and desist order issued under subdivision (2) of subsection (c) of this section. The proceeds of civil money penalties imposed pursuant to this subsection, net of documented expenses of examination and enforcement, shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2 .
  7. Administrative orders issued by the Commissioner and civil money penalties imposed for violation of such orders shall be subject to review by the Commission, which shall have power to amend, modify, or disapprove the same at any regular or special meeting.
  8. Notwithstanding any penalty imposed by the Commissioner, the Commission may, after notice of and opportunity for hearing, impose, enter judgment for, and enforce, by appropriate process, a penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) against any bank, trust company, or subsidiary thereof, or against any of its directors, officers, or employees, or any other person the Commissioner is authorized to regulate, for violating any lawful order of the Commission or Commissioner. The proceeds of civil money penalties imposed pursuant to this subsection, net of documented expenses of examination and enforcement, shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2 .
  9. If the Commissioner believes that a violation of a criminal statute has occurred, the Commissioner may refer the matter to the appropriate prosecutorial agency.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-13. Immediate action orders.

  1. In the event that the Commissioner determines that a bank has inadequate capital or insufficient capital or determines that immediate action is necessary to cause a bank to conduct its business in a safe and sound manner or to cause a bank or any of its directors, officers, or employees to cease from an act or course of conduct that threatens, or is reasonably probable of threatening, the financial integrity of the bank, the commissioner may order, as applicable, the bank to take such corrective action as the Commissioner deems necessary or may order the bank, director, officer, or employee to immediately cease such conduct, act, or course of conduct and to refrain therefrom in the future.
  2. Any order made under this section shall be effective upon issuance, provided, however, that the Commissioner shall promptly afford a subsequent hearing upon the order as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-14. Supervisory control.

  1. Whenever the Commissioner determines that a bank has insufficient capital and is conducting its business in an unsafe or unsound manner or in any fashion that threatens the financial integrity of the bank, the Commissioner may serve a notice of charges on the bank, requiring it to show cause why it should not be placed under supervisory control. The notice of charges shall specify the grounds for supervisory control and set the time and place for a hearing. A hearing before the Commissioner shall be held no earlier than seven days and no later than 15 days after issuance of the notice of charges.
  2. If, after the hearing provided in subsection (a) of this section, the Commissioner determines that supervisory control of the bank is necessary to protect the bank’s customers, creditors, or the general public, the Commissioner shall issue an order taking supervisory control of the bank. The board of directors of the bank in office on the date of the issuance of the order may appeal the order of the Commissioner to the Commission pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 no later than 10 days after the date of the issuance of the order.
  3. The Commissioner may appoint an agent to supervise and monitor the operations of the bank during the period of supervisory control. During the period of supervisory control, the bank shall act in accordance with any instructions and directions as may be given by the Commissioner, directly or through the agent, and shall not act or fail to act except when to do so would violate an outstanding order of its federal bank supervisory agent or the FDIC if the FDIC is not its primary federal regulator.
  4. Within 180 days of the date of the order taking supervisory control, the Commissioner shall issue an order approving a plan for the termination of supervisory control on the 30th day following the issuance of the order. The plan may provide for the following:
    1. The issuance by the bank of debt instruments or shares.
    2. The appointment or removal of one or more officers and/or one or more directors.
    3. The reorganization or combination of the bank.
    4. A control transaction with respect to the bank.
    5. The dissolution and liquidation of the bank.
  5. The reasonable costs of the Commissioner under this section shall be paid by the bank. The Commissioner’s determination of the costs shall be, in the absence of manifest error, dispositive of the issue of reasonableness.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-15. Removal of directors, officers, and employees.

  1. If the Commissioner determines that a director, officer, or employee of a bank has participated in or consented to any violation of this Chapter or an order of the Commissioner, or has engaged in any unsafe or unsound business practice in the operation of the bank, or has been dishonest, incompetent, or reckless in the management of the affairs of the bank, or has persistently violated the laws of this State, or repeatedly violated or failed to comply with any of the bank’s organizational documents, and that as a result, a situation exists requiring prompt corrective action in order to protect the bank, its customers, or the public, the Commissioner may issue an order temporarily removing the director, officer, or employee pending a hearing that shall occur not less 10 days after removal. The order shall state that it is a “Temporary Order of Removal” and shall further state the grounds upon which it was issued together with the date, time, and location of a hearing on the matter. For good cause shown, the Commissioner may grant the director, officer, or employee subject to the order a 10-day extension of the hearing date, but the temporary removal order shall remain in full force and effect. Upon a hearing before the Commissioner within the prescribed time, the temporary removal order may be dissolved or made permanent in whole or in part.
  2. Any removal under this section is effective in all respects as if the removal had been made by the shareholders of the bank in question.
  3. Without the prior written approval of the Commissioner, no director, officer, or employee subject to an order under this section shall be eligible to be elected, reelected, or appointed any position as a director, officer, or employee of that bank or any other North Carolina financial institution during the period of the order’s effect.
  4. An individual who is the subject of an order of the Commissioner under this section may appeal the order to the Commission pursuant to G.S. 53C-2-6 no later than 10 days after the date of issuance of the order.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-16. Emergency powers.

In the event of a natural disaster or other national, regional, state, or local emergency, the Commissioner may temporarily waive or suspend requirements for compliance by one or more banks with any provisions of this Chapter.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-8-17. Interstate regulatory agreements.

The Commissioner may enter into cooperative, coordinating, and information sharing agreements with (i) any bank supervisory agency having jurisdiction over an out-of-state bank that operates one or more branches in this State and (ii) any bank supervisory agency of another state in which a bank operates one or more branches with respect to the periodic examination or other supervision of the branches of the out-of-state bank operating in this State or the branches of the bank operating in such other state.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Article 9. Supervisory Liquidation; Voluntary Dissolution and Liquidation.

Part 1. General Provisions.

§ 53C-9-101. Supervisory combinations.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, in order to protect the public, including depositors and creditors of a bank, the Commissioner, upon making a finding that a bank is unable to operate in a safe and sound manner and is not reasonably likely to be able to resume safe and sound operations, may authorize or require a combination of the bank, a control transaction, or any other transaction, whether or not the Commissioner has taken supervisory control pursuant to G.S. 53C-8-14 . In ordering any such combination, control transaction, or other transaction, the Commissioner may order that a vote of the bank’s shareholders shall not be required to effect the combination, control transaction, or other transactions.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Analysis

I.General Consideration

Editor’s Note. —

The cases cited below were decided under former Article 3 (G.S. 53-18 et seq.) of Chapter 53 and prior law.

Bank Presumed to Have Complied with Prerequisites Before Resuming Operation. —

See People's Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 4 F. Supp. 379, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1516 (D.N.C. 1933), aff'd, 72 F.2d 932, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4734 (4th Cir. 1934).

Bank taken over by the Commissioner continues as a legal entity. It is not dissolved and does not cease to exist, but its powers are exercised by the Commissioner for the purpose of converting the assets, paying its liabilities, and distributing the surplus, if any, among the stockholders. People's Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 4 F. Supp. 379, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1516 (D.N.C. 1933), aff'd, 72 F.2d 932, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4734 (4th Cir. 1934).

Allowing Bank Officers to Continue Management Where Insolvency Imminent. —

Among other powers conferred by statute, the Corporation Commission (now Commissioner of Banks) may, without taking possession of the business and property of a State bank, upon its appearing to be in imminent danger of insolvency, direct upon what conditions its officers may continue in its management and control, and thus avoid losses to depositors, creditors, and stockholders, necessarily incident to the closing of its doors. Taylor v. Everett, 188 N.C. 247 , 124 S.E. 316, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 49 (1924) (cited in) People’s Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 4 F. Supp. 379, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1516 (M.D.N.C. 1933), aff’d, 72 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1934).

Commissioner as Chancery Receiver. —

The functions of the Commissioner of Banks are not limited to the provisions of this section, and the courts of equity have inherent power to permit him to exercise the functions of a chancery receiver in matters which are not inconsistent with his statutory duties. Blades v. Hood, 203 N.C. 56 , 164 S.E. 828, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 305 (1932).

The Commissioner acts as a receiver under the inherent power of the court only in matters which are not provided for by statute, and his powers and duties in the collection and distribution of the assets of an insolvent bank are derived from the statute. Hoft v. Mohn, 215 N.C. 397 , 2 S.E.2d 23, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 272 (1939).

Commissioner acts in a capacity equivalent to a receiver in taking over the assets of an insolvent bank, and in such capacity he represents the depositors and other creditors in the collection and distribution of the assets of the bank. Hood v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co., 209 N.C. 367 , 184 S.E. 51, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 484 (1936).

Commissioner as Representative of Bank. —

Although the ultimate purpose of the collection of assets is for the benefit of the creditors and others entitled to final distribution, and in this sense the Commissioner undoubtedly represents them, yet, in the collection of specific items of debt, in a more technical sense he must be held to represent the bank to whose rights and privileges he has succeeded and which he exercises. He can assert no greater right than that of the bank against any debtor, nor can he avoid any defense which might not be made against the bank. In this respect, he is pro hac vice the bank. The payment by him of a judgment against the bank, out of its funds, has the same effect as it would have had if paid by the bank, and an assignment to him has the force and effect of an assignment to the bank. Hoft v. Mohn, 215 N.C. 397 , 2 S.E.2d 23, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 272 (1939).

Vesting of Title to Assets in Receiver. —

Upon the appointment of a receiver under the statute, whether voluntary or by act of the Corporation Commission (now the Commissioner of Banks), the title to all the bank’s assets vests in the receiver to be administered for the benefit of its depositors, etc., alike. Douglass v. Dawson, 190 N.C. 458 , 130 S.E. 195, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 101 (1925).

Proceeds of Sale of Bank’s Property Cannot Be Paid to New Bank. —

The court having jurisdiction is without power to authorize the sale of an insolvent bank’s property under an agreement that the purchasers organize another bank and pay the purchase price to the newly-organized bank for distribution to the creditors and depositors, and thus relieve the Corporation Commission (now Commissioner of Banks) of its duty to collect and distribute the assets. In re LaFayette Bank & Trust Co., 198 N.C. 783 , 153 S.E. 452, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 487 (1930).

Section Does Not Affect Jurisdiction to Restrain Commissioner. —

The jurisdiction of the superior courts of this State to restrain the Commissioner of Banks, is not affected by this section. The Commissioner is an administrative officer of the State, and in the performance of his duties as prescribed by statute, is subject to the jurisdiction of the superior courts, in the exercise of their equitable jurisdiction. Stanly Bank & Trust Co. v. Hood, 206 N.C. 543 , 174 S.E. 503, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 236 (1934); Hood v. Burrus, 207 N.C. 560 , 178 S.E. 362, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 205 (1935).

When the Commissioner is made a party, he succeeds to the rights of the bank in the litigation pending and comes into the pending case for the purpose of protecting the rights of creditors in the recovery, not for the purpose of asserting a new and independent cause of action. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. People's Bank, 72 F.2d 932, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4734 (4th Cir. 1934), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 627, 55 S. Ct. 348, 79 L. Ed. 714, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 30 (1935).

No new cause of action is created where Commissioner is made a party to a previous action by the bank on its cashier’s fidelity bond. See People's Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 4 F. Supp. 379, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1516 (D.N.C. 1933), aff'd, 72 F.2d 932, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4734 (4th Cir. 1934).

Venue. —

In determining residence for purposes of venue, the personal residence of the Commissioner of Banks controls, in the absence of statute. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Hood, 225 N.C. 361 , 34 S.E.2d 204, 1945 N.C. LEXIS 311 (1945).

An action on a note by the Commissioner of Banks and the liquidating agent, etc., is properly brought in the county in which the insolvent bank is situate and of which the liquidating agent is a resident, and defendant’s motion for change of venue to the county of their residence is properly refused. Hood ex rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Progressive Stores, Inc., 209 N.C. 36 , 182 S.E. 694, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 14 (1935).

Action by Creditor Challenging Disposition of Assets. —

A bank creditor may not maintain an action to interfere with the disposition of its assets by the Commissioner in the absence of any allegation of fraud, bad faith, or neglect on the part of the Commissioner, and a showing that a greater return would result from the disposition of the assets as contended for by the creditor. In re Hood, 208 N.C. 509 , 181 S.E. 621, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 64 (1935).

Action to Recover for Wrongful Act of Officers and Directors. —

Where the wrongful act of officers and directors is a breach of their duty to the bank, resulting in loss to the bank, the damages recoverable are assets of the bank. Upon its insolvency and upon the appointment of a receiver for the liquidation of the bank, such receiver, in the first instance, may alone maintain the action to recover the damages, as assets of the bank, to be administered by him for the benefit of all its depositors, creditors or stockholders. Bane v. Powell, 192 N.C. 387 , 135 S.E. 118, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 301 (1926).

Order authorizing the Commissioner to sell a stock assessment judgment affected only the Commissioner and whoever purchased by virtue thereof, and so far as the stockholder against whom it was taken was concerned, the order was res inter alios acta. In re Hood, 208 N.C. 509 , 181 S.E. 621, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 64 (1935).

II.What Constitutes Assets

“Assets” Defined. —

The term “assets” is broad enough to cover anything available to pay the bank’s creditors. Hill v. Smathers, 173 N.C. 642 , 92 S.E. 607, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 361 (1917).

Right of Action Against Officers and Directors as Asset. —

The right of action by the receiver of an insolvent bank for loss or depreciation of the bank’s assets, due to the willful or negligent failure of its officers and directors to perform their official duties, is one enforceable for the benefit of the bank as well as for its creditors, and such liability of the officers and directors is an asset of the bank. Corporation Comm'n v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co., 193 N.C. 113 , 136 S.E. 362, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 283 (1927).

Recoverable Damages as Assets. —

Where the wrongful act of officers and directors is a breach of their duty to the bank, resulting in loss to the bank, the damages recoverable are assets of the bank. Bane v. Powell, 192 N.C. 387 , 135 S.E. 118, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 301 (1926).

III.Filing of Claims

When Claim Not Barred by Elapsing of 90-Day Period. —

In an action against the statutory receiver of an insolvent bank to recover bonds held by the bank for safekeeping, where the agent of the receiver advised plaintiffs that no claim was necessary for the bonds, and the defendant (receiver) contended that, under this section, the claim was barred for failure to bring suit within 90 days after the time designated for presenting claims, or in 90 days after the claim was presented and disallowed upon notice to plaintiffs, plaintiffs were not “creditors” or “claimants” within the meaning of this section and therefore it was not applicable to the action, and further, even conceding it was applicable, it would be inequitable and unconscionable for defendant to be allowed to set same up as a defense. Bright v. Hood, 214 N.C. 410 , 199 S.E. 630, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 367 (1938).

IV.Distribution of Assets and Preferences

Taxes on Bank Property Constitute Preferred Claim. —

Where a bank, owning the land upon which the bank building was situate, closed its doors and the Commissioner of Banks took possession for purposes of liquidation and at the time of closing there was an outstanding mortgage, all of which was unpaid and in default and county and town taxes were duly assessed and subsequently the mortgagee duly exercised the power of sale and became the purchaser of the property, the bank, the mortgagor, was the real owner and it was liable for taxes unpaid at the time of the sale. Such taxes constitute a preferred claim against the assets of the insolvent bank. Hood v. McGill, 206 N.C. 83 , 173 S.E. 20, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 111 (1934).

Purchaser of Bank Draft or Check Not Entitled to Preference. —

The purchase of a bank draft, a cashier’s check, or a certified check creates the relation of debtor and creditor between the bank and the purchaser, and the purchaser is not entitled to a preference over other general creditors of the bank from which it was purchased. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Hood, 205 N.C. 313 , 171 S.E. 344, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 543 (1933).

If a depositor in a bank takes a cashier’s check for his deposit, and thereafter surrenders the cashier’s check, purchasing with the proceeds a draft for the purchase price of certain bonds, and the bank is closed before the draft is paid, such transaction does not constitute a preference as defined by this section. In re Bank of Pender, 204 N.C. 143 , 167 S.E. 561, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 341 (1933).

No Preference to Check or Draft on Another Bank. —

Where a check was purchased from a bank, which a few days later became insolvent and the bank on which the check was drawn refused to honor it, the purchaser could not claim a preference under this section. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Hood, 205 N.C. 313 , 171 S.E. 344, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 543 (1933).

Nor Where Draft Sent to Drawee Bank for Collection Not Charged to Drawer’s Account. —

Where a depositor drew a draft on his local bank against a general deposit and the payee forwarded the draft to the drawee bank for collection and it was returned with notice of the bank’s insolvency, it was held that the drawer’s claim was not entitled to a statutory preference under this section for the reason that the bank did not charge the draft to the account of the drawer; and if the bank’s failure to return the draft within 24 hours after its receipt by mail implied an acceptance under the provisions of former G.S. 25-143 and G.S. 25-144, such acceptance did not ipso facto create a preference. Lamb v. Hood, 205 N.C. 409 , 171 S.E. 359, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 570 (1933).

Nor Where Cashier’s Check Issued but Proceeds Not Yet Remitted. —

Where a bank debits an account with the amount of a check drawn by the depositor and issues its cashier’s check for the amount but the bank is placed in a receiver’s hands before remitting the proceeds to a third person, as instructed to do by the depositor, the cashier’s check does not constitute a preference as defined by this section. Board of Educ. v. Hood, 204 N.C. 353 , 168 S.E. 522, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 402 (1933).

No Preference in Assets of Failed Collecting Bank. —

Where a certificate of deposit sent by an insurance company to a national bank for collection was used in clearance, a draft for the balance on the clearance transaction being received by the bank and its draft being sent to the company for the amount collected on the certificate; and the clearance draft not being paid, the collecting bank stopped payment on its draft and subsequently became insolvent, as did the other bank to the clearance transaction; and the collecting bank’s receiver filed claim with the receiver of the other bank for the amount of the clearance draft, which was paid in full as a preferred claim under subsection (m) of this section; a debtor and creditor relationship in regard to the certificate arose between the insurance company and the collecting bank, and the company’s successor was not entitled to a preference in the distribution of the collecting bank’s assets. Citizens Nat'l Bank v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 86 F.2d 4, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3635 (4th Cir. 1936), cert. denied, 299 U.S. 612, 57 S. Ct. 315, 81 L. Ed. 452, 1937 U.S. LEXIS 35 (1937).

Disposition of Assigned Assets Where Assignee Bank Becomes Insolvent. —

Where a bank assigned all its assets to another bank under an agreement, approved by the Commissioner of Banks, that the latter bank should pay all depositors and creditors of the former, but before the assignee bank had fully discharged the agreement it became insolvent and was taken over by the Commissioner, upon a showing that the assets of the assignor bank are sufficient to pay in full all its depositors and creditors, the assignor bank and its depositors and creditors may restrain the Commissioner from taking possession of the assigned assets, and, pending the trial of the issue involving the value of the assigned assets, they may restrain the Commissioner from levying upon and collecting the statutory liability of the stockholders of the assignor bank. Stanly Bank & Trust Co. v. Hood, 206 N.C. 543 , 174 S.E. 503, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 236 (1934).

Words “or otherwise” in the proviso in subsection (m) of this section, are to be construed in connection with the other parts of subsection (m), meaning any mode of transportation analogous to those specified in subsection (m), requiring “remitting” or “sending” the money to the payee of the check. Morecock v. Hood, 202 N.C. 321 , 162 S.E. 730, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 494 (1932).

Lien Under Subsection (m) Not Applicable to Solvent Banks. —

The proviso of subsection (m) of this section, relating to lien for amount of check, etc., collected and not remitted for, was not intended to apply to solvent banks. Spradlin v. Royal Mfg. Co., 73 F.2d 776, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2811 (4th Cir. 1934).

Nor to National Banks. —

The proviso in subsection (m) of this section relating to the distribution of the assets of insolvent banks has no application to the assets of national banks. The National Banking Act provides how the assets of insolvent national banks shall be distributed, and state statutes cannot affect this distribution. Spradlin v. Royal Mfg. Co., 73 F.2d 776, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2811 (4th Cir. 1934).

Where a national bank received a draft for collection and remitted therefor a draft drawn on one of its correspondents, but failed before this draft could be paid, the owner of the draft collected had no lien on the assets of the insolvent bank in the hands of the receiver. There was no augmentation of the assets of the bank as a result of the collection, but merely a shifting of credits, and consequently no basis for the declaration of a tract. Spradlin v. Royal Mfg. Co., 73 F.2d 776, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 2811 (4th Cir. 1934).

Check Presented over Counter Not Within Proviso. —

Where a depositor presented his check for payment over the counter of a bank, which charged his account with the amount thereof and gave him a draft drawn on another bank, which was returned unpaid, he was not entitled to a preference in the assets of the bank drawing the draft, the transaction not coming within the proviso in subsection (m), as the check was not received by mail, express, or otherwise. Morecock v. Hood, 202 N.C. 321 , 162 S.E. 730, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 494 (1932).

§ 53C-9-102. Distributions; assignments restricted.

A bank that is in the process of involuntary or voluntary dissolution pursuant to this Article may not make or pay distributions to its shareholders unless the bank has the prior written approval of the Commissioner. No bank shall make any general assignment for the benefit of its creditors except by surrendering possession of its assets to the Commissioner for dissolution and liquidation pursuant to G.S. 53-9-301, and any other purported assignment by the bank for the benefit of its creditors shall be void.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-103. Cancellation of charter.

Whenever a combination, dissolution, or other transaction occurs by which a bank ceases to exist or ceases to be eligible for a charter, the Commissioner shall by order cancel the bank’s charter and shall publish the order in accordance with G.S. 53-1-4(59). A copy of the order shall be filed by the Commissioner with the Secretary of State. The bank shall continue to exist under Chapter 55 of the General Statutes for the purpose of dissolving and liquidating its business and affairs.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 2. Voluntary Dissolution and Liquidation.

§ 53C-9-201. Voluntary dissolution prior to receipt of charter.

A bank in formation may, prior to issuance of its charter, give notice to the Commissioner and, with the Commissioner’s consent, abandon its application to the Commissioner and dissolve and liquidate by a majority vote of its board of directors and as provided under Chapter 55 of the General Statutes.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-202. Voluntary dissolution.

  1. With the approval of the Commissioner, a bank may engage in a voluntary dissolution and liquidation.
  2. If, by a majority vote, the board of directors of a bank should determine that in their judgment the bank should be dissolved and liquidated, then the board of directors shall submit immediately to the Commissioner the following documents, certified by an appropriate officer of the bank:
    1. The board of directors’ resolution.
    2. The bank’s proposed articles of dissolution.
    3. The board of directors’ plan for liquidation.
    4. Any notices or proxy solicitation materials proposed to be sent to shareholders.
  3. The Commissioner shall examine the documents submitted under subsection (b) of this section and such other matters as the Commissioner deems relevant and may issue an order authorizing the bank and its board of directors to proceed with dissolution and liquidation as provided in G.S. 53C-9-203 . Examination by the Commissioner of the materials referred to in subsection (b)(4) of this section shall not be deemed to be approval of the documents for any purpose.
  4. At any annual or special meeting of shareholders called for the purpose of voting upon a proposal for voluntary dissolution of a bank, the shareholders of the bank may, by an affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of the holders of shares representing at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on such matters, resolve to dissolve and liquidate the bank in accordance with the order of the Commissioner issued under subsection (c) of this section.
  5. If a majority of the board of directors of a bank should determine that in its best judgment the bank should be dissolved and liquidated but deems it impractical or otherwise inadvisable to proceed with a vote upon voluntary dissolution by the shareholders, then the board of directors shall immediately forward a certified copy of its resolution to the Commissioner and the Commissioner shall place the bank in receivership pursuant to G.S. 53C-9-301 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-203. Voluntary dissolution and liquidation procedure.

  1. At the appropriate time, the Commissioner shall do the following:
    1. Inform the FDIC and the bank’s federal supervisory agency if other than the FDIC.
    2. Select and appoint a receiver or receiver in liquidation, just as if the liquidation were involuntary under G.S. 53C-9-301 .
    3. Attach a certificate of approval to the articles of dissolution, and the bank shall then file the certified articles with the Secretary of State.
  2. Upon the filing of the articles of dissolution with the Secretary of State, it shall be unlawful for the bank to accept any additional deposit accounts or additions to deposit accounts or make any additional extensions of credit, but all its income and receipts in excess of actual expenses of liquidation of the bank shall be applied to the discharge of its liabilities.
  3. The persons charged with liquidation of the bank in the approved plan of dissolution shall cause to be published a public notice stating the bank has closed and will dissolve and liquidate and notifying its depositors and creditors to present their claims for payment, specifying the method for doing so.
  4. The bank may pay reasonable compensation, subject to the approval of the Commissioner, to the persons charged with its liquidation.
  5. Any bank in the process of voluntary dissolution and liquidation shall be subject to examination by the Commissioner and shall furnish any reports required by the Commissioner.
  6. If the Commissioner determines at any time that the voluntary liquidation plan is not working, the Commissioner may place the bank in receivership pursuant to G.S. 53C-9-301 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 3. Receivership; Involuntary Dissolution.

§ 53C-9-301. Receivership.

  1. The Commissioner may take custody of the books, records, and assets of every kind and character of any bank in the instances established in Part 2 of this Article or if it reasonably appears from one or more examinations made by the Commissioner that any of the following conditions exist:
    1. The directors or officers of the bank, or the liquidators of the bank subject to a voluntary plan of liquidation, have neglected, failed, or refused to take action that the Commissioner deems necessary for the protection of the bank.
    2. The directors, officers, or liquidators of the bank have impeded or obstructed an examination.
    3. The business of the bank is being conducted in a fraudulent, illegal, or unsafe manner.
    4. The bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business and it is not reasonably probable that it will be able to return to a safe and sound condition.
    5. The capital of the bank is impaired such that the likely realizable value of its assets is insufficient to pay and satisfy the claims of all depositors and all creditors.
    6. The directors or officers of the bank, or the liquidators of a bank subject to a voluntary plan of liquidation, have assumed duties or performed acts in excess of those authorized by applicable statutes or regulations, by the bank’s organizational documents or plan of liquidation, or without supplying the required bond.
    7. The bank is insolvent or is in imminent danger of insolvency or has suspended its ordinary business transactions due to insufficient funds.
    8. The bank is unable to continue operations.
  2. Unless the Commissioner reasonably finds that an emergency exists that requires that the Commissioner take custody immediately, the Commissioner shall first give written notice to the board of directors of the bank specifying which of those circumstances listed in subdivisions (1) through (8) of subsection (a) have been determined to exist and shall allow a reasonable time in which corrections may be made before a receiver of the bank will be appointed as outlined in subsections (c) and (d) of this section. For these purposes, “written notice” shall be deemed to include any report of examination or other confidential or nonconfidential written communication that is either directly from the Commissioner or is joined in by the Commissioner.
  3. The Commissioner shall appoint as receiver or coreceivers one or more qualified persons for the purpose of receivership and liquidation of the bank of which the Commissioner has taken custody under subsection (a) of this section, which receiver shall furnish a bond in such form and amount, and with such surety, as the Commissioner may require.
  4. The Commissioner may appoint the FDIC or its nominee as the receiver, and the receiver shall be permitted to serve without posting bond. In the event of such an appointment, the Commissioner shall thereafter be forever relieved of any and all responsibility and liability in respect to the receivership and the liquidation of the bank.
  5. In the event the Commissioner takes custody of a bank and then appoints a receiver for the bank, the Commissioner shall serve personally at the bank’s principal office through the officer who is present and appears to be in charge, the Commissioner’s order taking possession and, if applicable, the Commissioner’s order appointing a receiver for the bank in liquidation. The Commissioner shall also mail a certified copy of the order taking possession and the appointing order by certified mail or by express delivery to any previous receiver or other legal custodian of the bank and to the Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County. The Commissioner shall give notice to the public of the Commissioner’s actions by posting a notice summarizing the Commissioner’s actions near the entrance to each branch of the bank, and the Commissioner shall issue a similar public notice as defined in G.S. 53C-1-4(59).
  6. Whenever a receiver for a bank is duly appointed and qualified under subsection (c) or (d) of this section:
    1. The receiver, by operation of law and without any conveyance or other instrument, act, or deed, shall succeed to all the rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the bank, its shareholders, officers, and directors, or any of them, and to the titles to the books, records, and assets of every description of any previous receiver or other legal custodian of the bank. Neither the shareholders, officers, or directors, nor any of them, shall thereafter, except as expressly provided in this section, have or exercise any rights, powers, or privileges or act in connection with any assets or property of any nature of the bank in receivership.
    2. The Commissioner may, at any time, direct the receiver (unless it is the FDIC) to return the bank to its previous or a newly constituted management and its shareholders.
    3. A receiver, other than the FDIC, may, at any time during the receivership and before final liquidation, be removed and a replacement appointed by the Commissioner.
  7. A receiver may perform any of the following acts:
    1. Demand, sue for, collect, receive, and take into possession all the goods and chattels, rights and credits, moneys and effects, lands and tenements, books, papers, choses in action, bills, instruments, notes, intangible interests, and property of every description of the bank.
    2. Foreclose mortgages, deeds of trust, and other liens granted to the bank to the extent the bank would have the right to do so.
    3. Seek injunctions and institute suits for the recovery of any property, damages, or demands existing in favor of the bank, and shall, upon the receiver’s own application, be substituted as party plaintiff in the place of the bank in any suit or proceeding pending at the time of the receiver’s appointment.
    4. Sell, convey, and assign any or all of the property rights and interests owned by the bank.
    5. Appoint agents and engage independent contractors.
    6. Examine papers and investigate persons.
    7. Make and carry out agreements with the FDIC for the payment or assumption of the bank’s liabilities, in whole or in part, and to sell, convey, transfer, pledge, or assign assets as security or otherwise and to make guarantees in connection therewith.
    8. Perform all other acts that might be done by the employees, officers, and directors of the bank.These powers shall be continued in effect until liquidation of the bank or until return of the bank to its prior or newly constituted management.
  8. The Commissioner may, unless the FDIC has been appointed as receiver, determine that the receivership proceedings of a bank should be discontinued and the possession of the bank returned to newly constituted management. The Commissioner shall then remove the receiver and restore all the rights, powers, and privileges of the bank’s depositors, shareholders, customers, employees, officers, and directors. The return of a bank to a newly constituted management from the possession of a receiver shall, by operation of law and without any conveyance or other instrument, act, or deed, vest in the bank the title to all property held by the receiver in the capacity as receiver for the bank.
  9. Claims against a bank in receivership shall have the following order of priority for payment:
    1. Costs, expenses, and debts of the bank incurred on or after the date of the appointment of the receiver, including compensation for the receiver and a reasonable sum for the time of employees and agents of the OCOB.
    2. Claims of holders of deposit accounts.
    3. Claims of secured creditors in such order of priority as is established by applicable law or regulation.
    4. Claims of general creditors.
    5. Claims of holders of the bank’s shares in the order of preference established by the bank’s organizational documents.
  10. All claims of each class described within subsection (i) of this section shall be paid in full so long as sufficient assets are available therefor. Members of a class for which the receiver cannot make payment in full shall be paid an amount proportionate to their total claims.
  11. The Commissioner may direct the receiver to make payment of claims for which no provision is made in this section and may direct the payment of less than all claims within a class.
  12. When all assets of the bank have been fully liquidated, all claims and expenses have been paid or settled, and the receiver has recommended a final distribution, the dissolution of the bank in receivership shall be accomplished in the following manner:
    1. The receiver shall file with the Commissioner a detailed report, in a form to be prescribed by the Commissioner, of the receiver’s acts and proposed final distribution of the bank’s assets.
    2. Upon the Commissioner’s approval of the final report of the receiver, the receiver shall make the final distribution of the bank’s assets in any manner as the Commissioner may direct.
    3. When any unclaimed property, including funds due to a known but unlocated depositor, remains following the final distribution of the bank’s assets, such property shall be promptly transferred to the State Treasurer to hold in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 115B of the General Statutes.
    4. Upon completion of the actions described in this subsection, the process of dissolution and liquidation of the bank shall be deemed complete, and the Commissioner shall issue a certification of completed liquidation to the Secretary of State.
    5. Upon completion of the process of dissolution and liquidation, the Commissioner shall cause an examination of the receiver’s activities and records to be conducted, with which the receiver shall assist. The accounts of the receiver shall then be ruled upon by the Commissioner, and if approved, the receiver shall be given a final and complete discharge and release.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 4. Provisions Relating to Any Dissolution or Receivership.

§ 53C-9-401. Article relating to receivers applicable to insolvent banks.

Article 38A of Chapter 1 of the General Statutes, relating to receivers, when not inconsistent with the provisions of this Article, applies to the liquidation of banks under this Article.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2021-93, s. 9.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-93, s. 9, effective July 22, 2021, rewrote the section.

§ 53C-9-402. Storage and destruction of records.

  1. Any record of a bank that is in or has completed the process of dissolution and liquidation may be kept in compliance with the provisions of G.S. 53C-6-14 .
  2. All records of a bank that has completed the process of dissolution and liquidation shall be held in such place as in the Commissioner’s judgment will provide for their proper safekeeping and protection.
  3. After the expiration of five years from the date of filing of the certificate of completed liquidation under G.S. 53C-9-301 , the records of the liquidated bank may be destroyed by the Commissioner using commercially reasonable record destruction procedures.
  4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the destruction by the Commissioner of any of the records of the OCOB made by it with reference to the dissolution, receivership, or liquidation of any bank.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-403. Authority to serve as trustee terminated.

Whenever any bank that has been, or shall be, appointed trustee in any indenture, deed of trust, or other instrument of like character, executed to secure the payment of any bonds, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness, has been or shall be placed in receivership, a new trustee shall be appointed in the manner provided in G.S. 36C-7-704 or other applicable law, and the powers and duties of the bank as trustee in any such instrument shall immediately cease.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 19.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 19, effective April 16, 2013, inserted “a new trustee shall be appointed in the manner provided in G.S. 36C-7-704 or other applicable law, and” and deleted “upon the entry of an order of the clerk of superior court having jurisdiction under G.S. 53C-9-405 appointing a successor trustee, upon a petition as described in this Part” preceding “immediately cease” in this section.

§ 53C-9-404. Petition for new trustee; upon parties interested.

In all cases of dissolution receivership and liquidation under this Article, the clerk of superior court of any county in which an indenture, deed of trust, or other instrument of like character is recorded shall, upon the verified petition of any person interested in any such trust, either as trustee, beneficiary, or otherwise, which interest shall be set out in the petition, enter an order directing service, in the manner required by law for service of summons, on all interested parties of a notice requiring all persons having any interest in the trust to appear at the clerk’s office on a day designated in the order and notice, not less than 30 days from the date of the first publication of the notice, and show cause why a new trustee shall not be appointed. The notice shall set forth the names of the parties to the indenture, deed of trust, or other such instrument, and the date the documents were executed and the place of recording.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-405. Appointment of substitute trustee where no objection made.

If, upon the day fixed in the notice, no person appears and objects to the appointment of a substitute trustee, the clerk of superior court shall, upon such terms as he or she deems advisable to the best interest of all parties, appoint a competent person authorized to act as substitute trustee, who shall be vested with and shall exercise all the powers conferred upon the trustee named in the instrument.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-406. Hearing where objection made; appeal from order.

If objection is made to the appointment of a new trustee under this Part, the clerk shall hear and determine the matter, and from his or her decision an appeal may be prosecuted as in cases of special proceedings generally.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-407. Registration of final order.

The final order of appointment of a new trustee or trustees under this Part shall be certified by the clerk of superior court issuing the order and shall be recorded in the office of the register of deeds in the county or counties in which the instrument under which the appointment has been made is recorded.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-408. Petition and order applicable to all instruments involved.

The petition and the order appointing a new trustee or trustees under this Part may apply to any number of indentures, deeds of trust, or other instruments, wherein the same trustee or trustees are named.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-9-409. Additional remedy.

The appointment of a substitute trustee as described in this Part shall be in addition to and not substitution for any other remedy provided by law.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Article 10. Bank Holding Companies.

Part 1. Change in Control.

§ 53C-10-101. Holding companies.

Every holding company, as defined in G.S. 53C-1-4(39), that directly or indirectly controls a depository institution or nonbank subsidiary that has an office located in this State shall register with the Commissioner and maintain that registration on an annual basis in the form prescribed by the Commissioner.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2017-165, s. 10.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 10, effective July 21, 2017, substituted “Holding” for “Holdings” in the section head; and substituted “that directly or indirectly controls a depository institution or nonbank subsidiary that has an office located in this State” for “of a bank” in the middle.

§ 53C-10-102. Holding company control transaction.

  1. Except as otherwise expressly permitted by this section, a person shall not engage in a control transaction to which a holding company formed under the laws of this State and having a bank as a subsidiary is a party without the prior approval of the Commissioner. A person may contract to engage in a control transaction with the consummation of the control transaction being subject to receipt of the approval of the Commissioner.
  2. The Commissioner may require a person who is obligated to file a notice or an application under this section to appoint an agent resident in this State for service of process upon the filing of the notice or application or as a condition to the acceptance of the notice or application for review. An application for approval shall be in a form required by the Commissioner and shall be accompanied by such fee as may be required by rule.
  3. The following transactions shall not constitute a control transaction under this section requiring the prior approval of the Commissioner:
    1. The acquisition of control over voting securities by a person who has previously engaged in a control transaction with respect to the holding company after receiving the approval of the Commissioner under this Article, which approval permits the acquisition of control over additional voting securities, or any person who is an affiliate of the person previously engaging in the approved control transaction with such permission and who is identified in the application submitted for the approval, if the acquiring person files a notice with the Commissioner, in the form required by the Commissioner, describing the transaction at least 10 days before the acquiring person or affiliate thereof first votes or directs the voting of the voting securities.
    2. An acquisition of control over voting securities by operation of law, will, or intestate succession, if the acquiring person files a notice with the Commissioner, in the form required by the Commissioner, describing the acquisition or transfer at least 10 days before the acquiring person first votes or directs the voting of the voting securities.
    3. Bona fide gifts.
    4. A transaction exempted by rules, orders, or declaratory rulings of the Commissioner, issued because approval of the transaction is not necessary to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.
    5. An acquisition of control over voting shares exempt from the prior approval requirements set forth in section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. § 1842), pursuant to the exceptions described in items (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (a) of that section.
    6. An acquisition of control over voting securities in a transaction subject to approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. § 1842).
  4. Upon receipt of a notice described in subsection (c) of this section, the Commissioner may, before the 10th day following the receipt, notify the acquiring person of the Commissioner’s objection to the exercise of control over the voting securities or may require the acquiring party to submit further information before exercising control over the voting securities. An acquiring person receiving a notice of objection shall be required to submit an application for approval of a control transaction. An acquiring person receiving a notice to submit further information may be required to provide any information that would be included in an application for approval of a control transaction. In the event such an acquiring person is comprised of a group of persons, the Commissioner may require each member of the group to submit relevant information.
  5. All voting securities over which control has been acquired by an acquiring person shall not be voted on any matter submitted to a vote of the holders of the outstanding voting securities of the holding company of a bank and shall be deemed authorized but unissued for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum of holders of voting securities until such time as follows:
    1. The Commissioner has approved an application for approval of a control transaction with respect to the voting securities.
    2. The transaction is one listed in subsection (c) of this section that does not require the filing of a notice with the Commissioner.
    3. The transaction is one listed in subsection (c) of this section that requires a notice to be filed with the Commissioner and the Commissioner has not issued an objection to the notice and any requirement of the Commissioner for the filing of further information had been determined by the Commissioner to have been satisfied.

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 20.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 20, effective April 16, 2013, added “subsection (a) of” near the end of subdivision (c)(5); and added subdivision (c)(6).

§ 53C-10-103. Application regarding a control transaction.

  1. A person seeking approval of a control transaction to which a holding company of a bank is a party under this Article shall file the following with the Commissioner:
    1. An application in the form prescribed by the Commissioner.
    2. All filing fees required by rule of the Commissioner.
    3. Any other information required by a rule of the Commissioner or deemed by the Commissioner to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.
  2. In the event a person submitting an application is a group of persons, the Commissioner may require each member of the group to submit information relevant to the application.
  3. Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, information about the character, competence, or experience of an acquiring person or its proposed management personnel or affiliates shall be deemed a confidential record of the Commissioner subject to G.S. 53C-2-7(b) .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-104. Public notice.

A person filing an application for approval of a control transaction shall publish a public notice of the filing of the application not more than 30 days before nor more than 10 days after the filing of the application with the Commissioner. The public notice shall contain the following:

  1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
  2. The name of the applicable holding company and the address of its principal office.
  3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the proposed control transaction and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the publication of the public notice shall be considered. The public notice shall provide the current mailing address of the Commissioner.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-105. Actions on control transaction applications.

  1. The Commissioner shall examine the proposed control transaction, including the character, competence, and experience of the acquiring person and its proposed management personnel, to determine whether the financial stability of the holding company or the interests of the customers served by one or more bank subsidiaries of the holding company would be adversely affected by the proposed control transaction. Not later than the 60th day following receipt of a completed application for approval of a control transaction unless extraordinary circumstances require a longer period of review, the Commissioner shall approve or deny the application.
  2. The Commissioner may deny an application for approval of a control for any of the following reasons:
    1. The financial condition of the person seeking approval of a control transaction could jeopardize the financial stability of the holding company, one or more bank subsidiaries of the holding company, or the financial interests of the bank’s customers.
    2. An examination of the character, competence, or experience of any acquiring person or of any of the proposed management personnel of the holding company shows that it would not be in the interest of the customers of one or more of the bank subsidiaries of the holding company or in the interest of the public to permit the person to control the holding company.
    3. The plans or proposals of the person seeking approval with respect to exercising control over the holding company would not be in the best interests of the customers of one or more bank subsidiaries of the holding company.
    4. Upon the effective date of the proposed control transaction, one or more of the bank subsidiaries of the holding company would not be solvent, have inadequate capital, or not be in compliance with this Chapter or rules of the Commissioner.
    5. The application for approval is incomplete.
    6. If the acquiring person solicits votes for the approval of or consents to the control transaction from the holders of the voting securities of the holding company, adequate and complete disclosures of all material information about the proposed control transaction, together with a prominent statement that neither the control transaction nor any solicitation of such holders’ votes or consents has been approved by the Commissioner and that any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense, have not been made to the holders.
  3. If an application filed under this Part is approved by the Commissioner, the control transaction may become effective. All conditions to approval set forth in the order of the Commissioner shall be enforceable against the person, and each member of a group of persons, receiving the approval.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-106. Appeal.

Any order of the Commissioner denying an application for approval of a control transaction may be appealed to the Commission by the person filing the application denied, as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 2. Combinations.

§ 53C-10-201. Combination authority.

With the approval of the Commissioner, a holding company of a bank may combine with one or more other holding companies or other companies. The application for approval shall be in the form required by the Commissioner and shall be accompanied by such fee as may be required by rule.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-202. Combination application and investigation.

  1. A holding company of a bank seeking approval of a combination shall file with the Commissioner an application for approval, copies of the agreement under which the holding company proposes to effect the combination, and any additional information that the Commissioner shall require by rule or as is required by the Commissioner in connection with the application in order to achieve the objectives of this Chapter.
  2. A holding company filing an application for approval of a combination shall publish a public notice of the filing of the application not more than 30 days before nor more than 10 days after the filing of the application with the Commissioner. The public notice shall contain the following:
    1. A statement that the application has been filed with the Commissioner.
    2. The names of the parties to the proposed combination and the addresses of its principal offices.
    3. A statement that any interested person may make written comment on the proposed combination and that comments received by the Commissioner within 14 days of the publication of the public notice shall be considered. The public notice shall provide the current mailing address of the Commissioner.
  3. The Commissioner shall examine the proposed combination, including the character, competency, and experience of the proposed directors and executive officers of the surviving party of the combination, to determine whether the interests of the customers and communities served by the banks controlled by the parties to the combination would be adversely affected by the proposed combination.
  4. Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, information about the character, competence, and experience of the directors and executive officers of the parties to a combination received by the Commissioner shall be deemed a confidential record of the Commissioner subject to G.S. 53C-2-7(b) .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-203. Decision on application.

Based on the application and the Commissioner’s examination, the Commissioner shall enter an order approving or denying approval of the proposed combination not later than the 60th day following the date the Commissioner notifies the parties that the application is complete, unless extraordinary circumstances require a longer period of review.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-204. Appeal.

Any order of the Commissioner denying an application for approval of a combination may be appealed to the Commission by a party to the combination, as provided in G.S. 53C-2-6 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

Part 3. General Authority.

§ 53C-10-301. Cease and desist order.

Upon a finding that any action of a holding company subject to registration under this Article, or its nonbank affiliate, may be in violation of any banking laws, the Commissioner, after a reasonable notice to the holding company and an opportunity for it to be heard, shall have the authority to order it to cease and desist from such action. If the holding company fails to appeal the decision within 10 days of the date of the issuance of the order in accordance with G.S. 53C-2-6 , and continues to engage in the action in violation of the Commissioner’s order to cease and desist such action, it shall be subject to a civil money penalty of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each day it remains in violation of the order. The penalty provision of this section shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other provision of law applicable to a holding company’s failure to comply with an order of the Commissioner. The clear proceeds of the civil money penalty shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2 .

History. 2012-56, s. 4; 2013-29, s. 21.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-29, s. 21, effective April 16, 2013, substituted “registration under this Article, or its nonbank affiliate,” for “this Article” in the first sentence of this code section.

§ 53C-10-302. Other control changes.

Each holding company of a bank shall report to the Commissioner any changes in its directors, president, chief executive officer, or chief financial officer by the close of the second day on which the holding company is open for business following the change.

History. 2012-56, s. 4.

§ 53C-10-303. Fees.

A holding company subject to this Article shall pay the following fees:

  1. An initial registration fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000).
  2. An annual registration fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00).
  3. A fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for the issuance of any certified copies of documents plus one dollar ($1.00) per page over a number of pages specified by the Commissioner.

History. 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1113, s. 1; 2017-165, s. 11.

Editor’s Note.

This section was formerly codified as G.S. 53-232 . It was recodified as G.S. 53C-10-303 by Session Laws 2017-165, s. 11, effective July 21, 2017.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-165, s. 11, effective July 1, 2017, recodified former G.S. 53-232 as this section; substituted “A holding company subject to this Article” for “Each bank holding company subject to this act”; substituted “one thousand dollars ($1,000)” for “$1,000” in subdivision (1); substituted “seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00)” for “$750.00” in subdivision (2); and, in subdivision (3), substituted “fifty dollars ($50.00)” for “$50.00” and substituted “one dollar ($1.00)” for “$1.00”.