Article 1. Environmental Policy Act.
§ 113A-1. Title.
This Article shall be known as the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act of 1971.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 1; 1991, c. 431, s. 1.
Cross References.
For provision exempting the issuance of permits for sanitary landfills operated by local governments from the environmental impact statements required by this Article, see G.S. 130A-294(a)(4).
Extension of Permits.
For provisions pertaining to extension of permits during state of economic emergency in the real estate sector, pursuant to Session Laws 2009-406, ss. 1 through 5.1, as amended by Session Laws 2009-484, s. 5.1, 2009-550, s. 5.2, 2009-572, ss. 1-3, and Session Laws 2010-177, s. 1, see notes appearing under this catchline at G.S. 160A-385.1.
For provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009, Session Laws 2009-406, see the notes under G.S. 153A-344.1 and G.S. 160A-385.1.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1086, s. 123(b), provided that the Office of State Budget and Management could contract for and supervise all aspects of construction or demolition of certain prison facilities without being subject to the requirements of certain statutes including G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10 and 113A-50 through 113A-66. Session Laws 1989, c. 754, s. 28(a), made similar provisions. Likewise, Session Laws 1991, c. 689, s. 239(f), as amended by Session Laws 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1044, s. 41(b), made similar provisions and also provided for participation by minority and women-owned businesses.
As to exemption of the Office of State Budget and Management from the requirements of this Article in administration and implementation of the Prison Facilities Legislative Bond Act of 1990, see Session Laws 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 933, s. 6(4).
As to exemption of the Office of State Budget and Management from the requirements of this Article in providing prison facilities under the provisions of the State Prison and Youth Services Facilities Bond Act, see Session Laws 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 935, s. 6(a)(4).
As to exemption of the Office of State Construction of the Department of Administration from certain statutes, including G.S. 113A-1 through G.S. 113A-1 0, if the Secretary of Administration, after consultation with the Secretary of Correction [now Secretary of Public Safety], finds that the delivery of state prison and youth services facilities authorized to be constructed must be expedited for good cause, see Session Laws 1993, c. 550, s. 6.
As to exemption of the Office of State Construction of the Department of Administration from the requirements of this section to the extent necessary to expedite delivery of certain prison facilities, see Session Laws 1994, Extra Session, c. 24, s. 67(b).
As to exemption of the Office of State Construction of the Department of Administration from certain statutes, including G.S. 113A-1 through G.S. 113A-1 0, and G.S. 113A-50 through G.S. 113A-66 , if the construction of prison facilities in Avery and Mitchell Counties must be expedited for good cause, as determined by the Secretary of Administration and Secretary of Correction (now Secretary of Public Safety), see Session Laws 1995, c. 507, s. 27.10.
Session Laws 1996, Second Extra Session, c. 18, s. 23.4(a) provides in part that the Department of Justice, in consultation with the Office of State Construction of the Department of Administration, shall contract for and supervise all aspects of administration, technical assistance, design, construction, or demolition of all facilities in order to implement the repairs and renovations of the Western Justice Academy without being subject to this statute.
As to exemption of the Office of State Construction of the Department of Administration from certain statutes, including G.S. 113A-1 through G.S. 113A-1 0 and G.S. 113A-50 through G.S. 113A-66 , and rules implementing these sections, to the extent necessary to expedite delivery of juvenile facilities, see Session Laws 1998-202, s. 35(a), quoted under G.S. 143-128 .
Session Laws 2001-452, s. 1.1, effective October 28, 2001, repeals Session Laws 1999-237, ss. 15.14(a) to (g), which had provided for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and North Carolina State University to jointly establish the North Carolina Water Quality Workgroup, to work collaboratively with the appropriate divisions of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and North Carolina State University, the Scientific Advisory Council on Water Resources and Coastal Fisheries Management, the Environmental Management Commission, and the Environmental Review Commission to identify the scientific and State agency databases that could be used to formulate public policy regarding the State’s water quality, evaluate those databases to determine the information gaps in those databases, and establish the priorities for obtaining the information lacking in those databases, to develop a water quality monitoring system to be known as Rivernet, and to make an annual report.
Session Laws 2003-435, 2nd Ex. Sess., s. 1.2.(c), provides: “Site development funded by money appropriated under this section is not subject to Article 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes (public contracts) or Article 3 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes (purchases and contracts), except where public funds are expended the provisions of G.S. 143-48 and G.S. 143-128.2 shall apply. Actions involving expenditures of public moneys or use of public lands for projects and programs involved in site development funded by money appropriated under this section are exempt from the requirements of Article 1 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes. This exemption does not apply to an ordinance adopted under G.S. 113A-8 .”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 9.14(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wind turbines and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. If Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, becomes law, the provisions of Part 12 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes as enacted by that act shall not apply to the facilities authorized by this section. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, did not become law.
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2009’.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.5 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(a), provides: “The General Assembly finds that strengthening research and development efforts on renewable energy sources is critical to North Carolina’s environment and economy, and that recent events resulting from the British Petroleum oil spill amplify the need for North Carolina’s innovators and scientists to enhance their efforts to develop sustainable energy sources and technologies that do not threaten the health and well-being of the State’s waters, sensitive lands, and residents. In order to provide opportunities for research into tidal, wave, and other ocean-based sources of alternative energy, the University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute shall form a consortium with the Colleges of Engineering at North Carolina State University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to study the capture of energy from ocean waves. The Coastal Studies Institute shall be designated the lead agency in coordinating these efforts. Funding appropriated by this act shall be used by university scientists to conceptualize, design, construct, operate, and market new and innovative technologies designed to harness and maximize the energy of the ocean in order to provide substantial power generation for the State. Funding may be used to leverage federal or private research funding for this purpose, but may not be used to purchase and utilize technology that has already been developed by others unless that technology is a critical component to North Carolina’s research efforts. Wave energy technologies developed and used for this research may be attached to or staged from an existing State-owned structure located in the ocean waters of the State, and data generated by these technologies shall be available at this structure for public education and awareness. It is the intent of the General Assembly that North Carolina become the focal point for marine-based ocean research collaborations involving the nation’s public and private universities.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wave energy facility and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2010’.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2010-2011 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.6 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 56(a), provides: “Public water systems with expired authorizations for water treatment plants that have been deactivated may obtain new water treatment plant authorizations that allow the system to withdraw surface water from the same water body and at the same rate as approved in the expired authorization, and such new authorizations shall not be required to prepare an environmental document pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 56(b), provides: “This section applies only to those public water systems for which the authorization for the water treatment plant expired within the last 10 calendar years of the effective date of this act.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(b), provides: “Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law [August 23, 2013].” Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), had provided that: “This act becomes effective July 1, 2015.” Session Laws 2014-115, s. 17, amended Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), to replace the reference to “This act” with the words “This Part.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(a), is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2017-113, s. 3, provides: “The facility authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except as otherwise provided in this section. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this act shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: Articles 3 and 8 of Chapter 143, Articles 1 and 4 of Chapter 113A. Notwithstanding G.S. 146-11 and Article 16 of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes, the approval of the Council of State shall not be required for the granting of easements for the facility authorized under this act. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facility, the Department of Environmental Quality is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Legal Periodicals.
For survey of 1982 law on administrative law, see 61 N.C.L. Rev. 961 (1983).
For article discussing a practical interpretation of North Carolina’s comprehensive plan requirement for zoning regulations, see 7 Campbell L. Rev. 1 (1984).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
For note, “Resurrecting a Doctrine on its Deathbed: Revisiting Federal Common Law Greenhouse Gas Litigation After Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA,” see 67 Duke L.J. 1073 (2018).
For article, “Property’s Problem with Extremes,” see 55 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1 (2020).
CASE NOTES
The North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for publicly funded actions that significantly affect the environment. For the same reasons that an EIS is required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), one must be prepared in accordance with SEPA. Mullin v. Skinner, 756 F. Supp. 904, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18265 (E.D.N.C. 1990).
Environmental Impact Statement Required — Bridge Construction. —
For a case holding that state and federal agencies were required to file environmental impact statements, under both federal law and this chapter, concerning a coastal bridge replacement project, see Mullin v. Skinner, 756 F. Supp. 904, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18265 (E.D.N.C. 1990).
Sufficiency of Environmental Impact Statement. —
Because the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), in 42 U.S.C.S. § 4332(2)(C), did not require a climate change or greenhouse gases analysis, and the environmental impact statement stated no national standards existed, and the Environmental Protection Agency was consulted but never suggested such a study, plaintiff nonprofit organizations’ NEPA and North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, G.S. 113A-1 et seq., challenge to defendant state and federal agencies’ highway project failed under Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.S. § 706(2)(A), (D), review. N.C. Alliance for Transp. Reform, Inc. v. United States DOT, 713 F. Supp. 2d 491, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49742 (M.D.N.C. 2010).
§ 113A-2. Purposes.
The purposes of this Article are: to declare a State policy which will encourage the wise, productive, and beneficial use of the natural resources of the State without damage to the environment, maintain a healthy and pleasant environment, and preserve the natural beauty of the State; to encourage an educational program which will create a public awareness of our environment and its related programs; to require agencies of the State to consider and report upon environmental aspects and consequences of their actions involving the expenditure of public moneys or use of public land; and to provide means to implement these purposes.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 2; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, s. 1.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Filing of Statement. —
Nothing in this Chapter makes the filing of a statement a condition precedent to the commencement of construction of a building for which State funds have been appropriated. Lewis v. Craven Reg'l Med. Ctr., 134 N.C. App. 438, 518 S.E.2d 1, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 804 (1999), aff'd, 352 N.C. 668 , 535 S.E.2d 33, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 750 (2000).
§ 113A-3. Declaration of State environmental policy.
The General Assembly of North Carolina, recognizing the profound influence of man’s activity on the natural environment, and desiring, in its role as trustee for future generations, to assure that an environment of high quality will be maintained for the health and well-being of all, declares that it shall be the continuing policy of the State of North Carolina to conserve and protect its natural resources and to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony. Further, it shall be the policy of the State to seek, for all of its citizens, safe, healthful, productive and aesthetically pleasing surroundings; to attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety; and to preserve the important historic and cultural elements of our common inheritance.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 3.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Toxic Waste Disposal Falls Within Zone of Protected Interests. —
County had standing to challenge the creation of a toxic waste disposal site within its borders under this Article, as such a site falls within the zone of interests protected under this section. Warren County v. North Carolina, 528 F. Supp. 276, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18098 (E.D.N.C. 1981).
§ 113A-4. Cooperation of agencies; reports; availability of information.
The General Assembly authorizes and directs that, to the fullest extent possible:
- The policies, rules, and public laws of this State shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this Article; and
-
Every State agency shall include in every recommendation or report on any action involving significant expenditure of public moneys or use of public land for projects and programs significantly affecting the quality of the environment of this State, a detailed statement by the responsible official setting forth the following:
- The direct environmental impact of the proposed action;
- Any significant adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented;
- Mitigation measures proposed to minimize the impact;
- Alternatives to the proposed action;
- The relationship between the short-term uses of the environment involved in the proposed action and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and
-
Any irreversible and irretrievable environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented.
(2a) Prior to making any detailed statement, the responsible official shall consult with and obtain the comments of any agency which has either jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved. The failure of an agency to provide comments within the comment period established under this subdivision or to request an extension for a specific period of time set forth in the request shall be treated by the responsible official as a conclusion by that agency that there is no significant environmental impact. Any unit of local government or other interested party that may be adversely affected by the proposed action may submit written comment. The responsible official shall consider written comment from units of local government and interested parties that is received within the established comment period. Copies of such detailed statement and such comments shall be made available to the Governor, to such agency or agencies as he may designate, and to the appropriate multi-county regional agency as certified by the Secretary of Administration, shall be placed in the public file of the agency and shall accompany the proposal through the existing agency review processes. A copy of such detailed statement shall be made available to the public and to counties, municipalities, institutions and individuals, upon request.
- The Governor, and any State agency charged with duties under this Article, may call upon any of the public institutions of higher education of this State for assistance in developing plans and procedures under this Article and in meeting the requirements of this Article, including without limitation any of the following units of the University of North Carolina: the Water Resources Research Institute, the Institute for Environmental Studies, the Triangle Universities Consortium on Air Pollution, and the School of Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 125; 1991, c. 431, s. 2; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, s. 2; 2006-264, s. 29(g); 2015-90, s. 1.
Extension of Permits.
For provisions pertaining to extension of permits during state of economic emergency in the real estate sector, pursuant to Session Laws 2009-406, ss. 1 through 5.1, as amended by Session Laws 2009-484, s. 5.1, 2009-550, s. 5.2, 2009-572, ss. 1-3, and Session Laws 2010-177, s. 1, see notes appearing under this catchline at G.S. 160A-385.1.
For provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009, Session Laws 2009-406, see the notes under G.S. 153A-344.1 and G.S. 160A-385.1.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2006-264, s. 29(g), effective August 27, 2006, substituted “School of Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill” for “Institute of Government” at the end of subdivision (3).
Session Laws 2015-90, s. 1, effective June 19, 2015, in subdivision (2), inserted “significant” preceding “expenditure of public moneys” in the introductory language, and substituted “direct environmental” for “environmental” in subdivision (2)a.; and inserted the second sentence in subdivision (2a). For applicability, see editor’s note.
Legal Periodicals.
For survey of 1980 administrative law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1026 (1981).
For survey of 1981 administrative law, see 60 N.C.L. Rev. 1165 (1982).
For article, “Wind Over North Carolina Waters: The State’s Preparedness to Address Offshore and Coastal Water-Based Wind Energy Projects,” see 87 N.C.L. Rev. 1819 (2009).
CASE NOTES
Analysis
I.General Consideration
Reasons for State Environmental Impact Statements Are the Same as under Federal Law. —
The North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for publicly funded actions that significantly affect the environment. For the same reasons that an EIS is required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), one must be prepared in accordance with SEPA. Mullin v. Skinner, 756 F. Supp. 904, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18265 (E.D.N.C. 1990).
II.Environmental Impact Statements
A.In General
Purpose. —
The purpose of an environmental impact statement is to provide the responsible State agency with a useful decision-making tool. In re Environmental Mgt. Comm'n, 53 N.C. App. 135, 280 S.E.2d 520, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2580 (1981).
The requirement of the impact statement is designed to provide a mechanism by which all affected State agencies raise and consider environmental factors of proposed projects. In re Environmental Mgt. Comm'n, 53 N.C. App. 135, 280 S.E.2d 520, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2580 (1981).
Statement Must Be Before Decisionmaker. —
In order for a statement to be a decisionmaking tool, the responsible State agency must have the statement before it when it is determining the action it is going to take or recommend. In re Environmental Mgt. Comm'n, 53 N.C. App. 135, 280 S.E.2d 520, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2580 (1981).
“Rule of Reason” Measures Adequacy. —
In determining the adequacy of an environmental impact statement under this section, the federal courts’ “rule of reason” is sufficient to determine if the statement was compiled with objective good faith and whether the resulting statement would permit a decisionmaker to consider and balance fully environmental factors. Warren County v. North Carolina, 528 F. Supp. 276, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18098 (E.D.N.C. 1981).
Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that state and federal agencies and officials contravened the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.S. § 4321 et seq., by violating the North Carolina regulatory notice procedures for an environmental impact statement with regard to a highway expansion project that did not dictate the agencies’ substantive outcome. MooreFORCE, Inc. v. United States DOT, 243 F. Supp. 2d 425, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1662 (M.D.N.C. 2003).
B.Contents
Method of Quality Control for Toxic Waste Site. —
There is no requirement under this section for the State to set forth in an environmental impact statement how quality control of a toxic waste disposal site will be done. The reporting requirements of this Article insure that it is done. Warren County v. North Carolina, 528 F. Supp. 276, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18098 (E.D.N.C. 1981).
C.Agency Actions Requiring Statement
Minimum Criteria. —
Appellate court rejected property owners’ argument that a town improperly initiated proceedings to condemn their property before the North Carolina Department of Transportation completed an environmental impact study on a proposal to widen and improve a road because the total right-of-way sought was less than 10 acres and it fell under the “minimum criteria” standards set forth in N.C. Admin. Code. Town of Highlands v. Hendricks, 164 N.C. App. 474, 596 S.E.2d 440, 2004 N.C. App. LEXIS 1009 (2004).
Authorization for Acquisition of Land for Reservoir. —
The issuance of a certificate by the Environmental Management Commission authorizing acquisition of land for the construction of a reservoir constitutes a “recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and actions involving expenditure of public moneys for projects and programs significantly affecting the quality of the environment,” thereby necessitating an environmental impact statement. In re Environmental Mgt. Comm'n, 53 N.C. App. 135, 280 S.E.2d 520, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2580 (1981).
Construction of Building for Which State Funds Appropriated. —
Nothing in this Chapter makes the filing of a statement a condition precedent to the commencement of construction of a building for which State funds have been appropriated. Lewis v. White, 287 N.C. 625 , 216 S.E.2d 134, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1169 (1975).
Need for Statement Became Moot. —
Where plaintiff’s sought declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the selection and testing of potential sites for a disposal facility for dangerous waste, alleging violations of state law in the selection process and raising due process claims, because the characterization of both sites became virtually complete while appeal of the trial court was pending, plaintiff’s claim seeking to require the preparation by the defendants of a precharacterization environmental impact statement was moot. Richmond County v. North Carolina Low-level Radioactive Waste Mgt. Auth., 108 N.C. App. 700, 425 S.E.2d 468, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 171 , aff'd, 335 N.C. 77 , 436 S.E.2d 113, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 539 (1993).
OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Neither the development of a fishery management plan nor the subsequent adoption of rules to implement the plan is an “action” involving the expenditure of public monies or use of public lands within the meaning of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, and therefore does not require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to this section. See opinion of Attorney General to Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director Division of Marine Fisheries, 1998 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 13 (2/25/98).
§ 113A-5. Review of agency actions involving major adverse changes or conflicts.
Whenever, in the judgment of the responsible State official, the information obtained in preparing the statement indicates that a major adverse change in the environment, or conflicts concerning alternative uses of available natural resources, would result from a specific program, project or action, and that an appropriate alternative cannot be developed, such information shall be presented to the Governor for review and final decision by him or by such agency as he may designate, in the exercise of the powers of the Governor.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 5.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-6. Conformity of administrative procedures to State environmental policy.
All agencies of the State shall periodically review their statutory authority, administrative rules, and current policies and procedures for the purpose of determining whether there are any deficiencies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit or hinder full compliance with the purposes and provisions of this Article and shall propose to the Governor such measures as may be necessary to bring their authority, rules, policies and procedures into conformity with the intent, purposes and procedures set forth in this Article.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 6; 1987, c. 827, s. 126.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-7. Other statutory obligations of agencies.
Nothing in this Article shall in any way affect nor detract from specific statutory obligations of any State agency
- To comply with criteria or standards of environmental quality or to perform other statutory obligations imposed upon it,
- To coordinate or consult with any other State agency or federal agency, or
- To act, or refrain from acting contingent upon the recommendations or certification of any other State agency or federal agency.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 7.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Relation Between Federal and State Law. —
The North Carolina Board of Transportation would be acting within this Article, the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, if it were complying with either the State or federal environmental regulations or procedural requirements, and to the extent that the federal environmental law is relied upon to meet the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, the federal requirements are by reference enforceable against North Carolina agencies as State law. Orange County Sensible Hwys. & Protected Env'ts, Inc. v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 46 N.C. App. 350, 265 S.E.2d 890, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2836 (1980).
§ 113A-8. Major development projects.
- The governing bodies of all cities, counties, and towns acting individually, or collectively, may by ordinance require any special-purpose unit of government or private developer of a major development project to submit detailed statements, as defined in G.S. 113A-4(2) , of the impact of such projects for consideration by those governing bodies in matters within their jurisdiction. Any such ordinance may not be designed to apply to only a particular major development project, and shall be applied consistently.
- Any ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall exempt those major development projects for which a detailed statement of the environmental impact of the project or a functionally equivalent permitting process is required by federal or State law, regulation, or rule.
- Any ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall establish minimum criteria to be used in determining whether a statement of environmental impact is required. A detailed statement of environmental impact may not be required for a project that does not exceed the minimum criteria and any exceptions to the minimum criteria established by the ordinance.
- Any ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall exempt from its requirements the certain cases for which an environmental document is not required as set forth in G.S. 113A-12 .
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 8; 1991, c. 431, s. 3; 2014-90, s. 5.
Extension of Permits.
For provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009, Session Laws 2009-406, see the notes under G.S. 153A-344.1 and G.S. 160A-385.1.
For provisions pertaining to extension of permits during state of economic emergency in the real estate sector, pursuant to Session Laws 2009-406, ss. 1 through 5.1, as amended by Session Laws 2009-484, s. 5.1, 2009-550, s. 5.2, 2009-572, ss. 1-3, and Session Laws 2010-177, s. 1, see notes appearing under this catchline at G.S. 160A-385.1.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2003-435, 2nd Ex. Sess., s. 1.2(c), provides: “Site development funded by money appropriated under this section is not subject to Article 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes (public contracts) or Article 3 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes (purchases and contracts), except where public funds are expended the provisions of G.S. 143-48 and G.S. 143-128.2 shall apply. Actions involving expenditures of public moneys or use of public lands for projects and programs involved in site development funded by money appropriated under this section are exempt from the requirements of Article 1 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes. This exemption does not apply to an ordinance adopted under G.S. 113A-8 .”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2014-90, s. 5, effective July 30, 2014, added subsection (d).
§ 113A-8.1. Surface water transfers.
An environmental assessment shall be prepared for any transfer for which a petition is filed in accordance with G.S. 143-215.22 L. The determination of whether an environmental impact statement is needed with regard to the proposed transfer shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
History. 1998-168, s. 6; 2007-484, s. 43.7C; 2007-518, s. 4.
Allocation of Surface Water Resources Study.
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 1(a), as amended by Session Laws 2008-10, s. 1, provides: “The Environmental Review Commission, with the assistance of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, shall study the allocation of surface water resources and their availability and maintenance in the State, including issues related to the transfer of water from one river basin to another, the withdrawal of water for consumptive use, and the accuracy and tolerance of equipment used to measure the flow of water transferred from one river basin to another river basin. The Commission shall evaluate the benefits of establishing formal and informal procedures for negotiating transfers of water from one river basin to another. The Commission shall also study and recommend measures to: (i) ensure that the purposes of the Regional Water Supply Planning Act of 1971, as set out in G.S. 162A-21 , are fulfilled; (ii) provide for a comprehensive system for regulating surface water withdrawals for consumptive and nonconsumptive uses; (iii) provide for the establishment of a statewide plan for water resources development projects; (iv) provide for adequate resources for the Department so that it may develop and implement a comprehensive approach to water resources management; (v) ensure that all State laws regulating water resources are consistent with and fully integrated into the comprehensive system for regulating surface water withdrawals and the statewide plan for water resources development projects; and (vi) ensure that potential interstate conflicts related to water resources are avoided or minimized. In the conduct of this study, the Environmental Review Commission may employ independent consultants as provided in G.S. 120-32.02 and G.S. 120-70.44 . The Environmental Review Commission may submit interim reports to the 2008 and 2009 regular sessions of the General Assembly and shall submit a final report of its findings and recommendations, including any legislative proposals, to the General Assembly on or before 1 October 2010.”
Session Laws 2008-125, s. 2, provides: “As a part of the study by the Environmental Review Commission of the allocation of water resources in this State pursuant to subsection (a) of Section 1 of S.L. 2007-518, the Environmental Review Commission shall study the delineation of major river basins and subbasins within the State. The Commission shall determine whether the definition of ‘river basin’ set out in G.S. 143-215.22 G and the accompanying map should be revised. The Commission shall report its findings and recommendations as provided in subsection (a) of Section 1 of S.L. 2007-518, as amended.”
Session Laws 2008-143, s. 6, provides: “The Environmental Review Commission, as part of its ongoing study of the allocation of water resources in the State required by Section 1 of S.L. 2007-518, shall study issues related to increasing water supply, including issues related to reservoir construction and State laws and rules governing reservoir construction. The Environmental Review Commission shall report its findings and recommendations, including any legislative proposals, to the General Assembly as provided by Section 1 of S.L. 2007-518, as amended.”
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 6, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 7, as amended by Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7C, Session Laws 2010-155, s. 4, Session Laws 2011-298, s. 2, and Session Laws 2013-388, s. 3(c), provides: “This act becomes effective when it becomes law and applies to any petition for a certificate for a transfer of surface water from one river basin to another river basin first made on or after that date.”
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 7(b), was repealed by Session Laws 2011-298, s. 2.
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 7(c) and (d), as added by Session Laws 2010-155, s. 4, provide: “(c) For purposes of this subsection, ‘isolated river basin’ means each of the following river basins set out in G.S. 143-215.22 G(1):
“g. 2-6 New River.
“v. 9-4 Shallotte River.
“aa. 12-1 Albemarle Sound.
“hh. 17-1 White Oak River.
“For a petition for a certificate for transfer of surface water from a river basin to an isolated river basin, this act becomes effective 1 July 2020. Prior to 1 July 2020, a petition for a certificate for transfer of surface water from a river basin to an isolated river basin shall be considered and acted upon by the Environmental Management Commission pursuant to the procedures and standards set out in G.S. 143-215.22 I on 1 July 2007.
“(d) Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section, an applicant for a certificate for transfer of surface water from a river basin to an isolated river basin may request that the applicant be subject to the certification process that would apply if the transfer was not into an isolated river basin.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2007-518, s. 4, effective August 31, 2007, substituted “G.S. 143-215.22L” for “G.S. 143-215.22I.” For applicability provisions, see Editor’s Note.
§ 113A-9. Definitions.
As used in this Article, unless the context indicates otherwise, the term:
- “Environmental assessment” (EA) means a document prepared by a State agency to evaluate whether the probable impacts of a proposed action require the preparation of an environmental impact statement under this Article.
- “Environmental document” means an environmental assessment, an environmental impact statement, or a finding of no significant impact.
- “Environmental impact statement” (EIS) means the detailed statement described in G.S. 113A-4(2) .
- “Finding of no significant impact” (FONSI) means a document prepared by a State agency that lists the probable environmental impacts of a proposed action, concludes that a proposed action will not result in a significant adverse effect on the environment, states the specific reason or reasons for such conclusion, and states that an environmental impact statement is not required under this Article.
- “Major development project” shall include but is not limited to shopping centers, subdivisions and other housing developments, and industrial and commercial projects, but shall not include any projects of less than ten contiguous acres in extent.
- “Minimum criteria” means a rule that designates a particular action or class of actions for which the preparation of environmental documents is not required.
-
“Public land” means all land and interests therein, title of which is vested in the State of North Carolina, in any State agency, or in the State for the use of any State agency or political subdivision of the State, and includes all vacant and unappropriated land, swampland, submerged land, land acquired by the State by virtue of being sold for taxes or by any other manner of acquisition, or escheated land.
(7a) “Significant expenditure of public moneys” means expenditures of public funds greater than ten million dollars ($10,000,000) for a single project or action or related group of projects or actions. For purposes of this subdivision, contributions of funds or in-kind contributions by municipalities, counties, regional or special-purpose government agencies, and other similar entities created by an act of the General Assembly and in-kind contributions by a non-State entity shall not be considered an expenditure of public funds for purposes of calculating whether such an expenditure is significant.
- “Special-purpose unit of government” includes any special district or public authority.
- “State agency” includes every department, agency, institution, public authority, board, commission, bureau, division, council, member of Council of State, or officer of the State government of the State of North Carolina, but does not include local governmental units or bodies such as cities, towns, other municipal corporations or political subdivisions of the State, county or city boards of education, other local special-purpose public districts, units or bodies of any kind, or private corporations created by act of the General Assembly, except in those instances where programs, projects and actions of local governmental units or bodies are subject to review, approval or licensing by State agencies in accordance with existing statutory authority, in which case local governmental units or bodies shall supply information which may be required by such State agencies for preparation of any environmental statement required by this Article.
- “State official” means the Director, Commissioner, Secretary, Administrator or Chairman of the State agency having primary statutory authority for specific programs, projects or actions subject to this Article, or his authorized representative.
-
“Use of public land” means land-disturbing activity of greater than 10 acres that results in substantial, permanent changes in the natural cover or topography of those lands that includes:
- The grant of a lease, easement, or permit authorizing private use of public land; or
- The use of privately owned land for any project or program if (i) the State or any agency of the State has agreed to purchase the property or to exchange the property for public land and (ii) the use meets the other requirements of this subdivision.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 9; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, s. 3; 2015-90, s. 2.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-90, s. 2, effective June 19, 2015, substituted “ten contiguous acres” for “two contiguous acres” in subdivision (5); substituted “taxes or by any other manner of acquisition, or escheated land” for “taxes, escheated land, and acquired land” in subdivision (7); added subdivision (7a); and in subdivision (11), rewrote the introductory language, inserted the clause (i) designation and added clause (ii) in subdivision (11)b. For applicability, see editor’s note.
CASE NOTES
Timeliness. —
Because plaintiffs waited over four years to file their petition with the court, after the Finding of No Significant Impact, the environmental review process was at an end; plaintiffs never sought required administrative review. Citizens for Responsible Roadways v. N.C. DOT, 145 N.C. App. 497, 550 S.E.2d 253, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 655 (2001).
§ 113A-10. Provisions supplemental.
The policies, obligations and provisions of this Article are supplementary to those set forth in existing authorizations of and statutory provisions applicable to State agencies and local governments. In those instances where a State agency is required to prepare an environmental document or to comment on an environmental document under provisions of federal law, no separate environmental document shall be required to be prepared or published under this Article so long as the environmental document or comment meets the provisions of this Article.
History. 1971, c. 1203, s. 10; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, s. 4; 2015-90, s. 3.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-90, s. 3, effective June 19, 2015, in the second sentence, inserted “no separate environmental document shall be required to be prepared or published under this Article so long as” and substituted “meets” for “shall meet.” For applicability, see editor’s note.
CASE NOTES
Relation Between Federal and State Law. —
The North Carolina Board of Transportation would be acting within this Article, the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, if it were complying with either the State or federal environmental regulations or procedural requirements, and to the extent that the federal environmental law is relied upon to meet the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, the federal requirements are by reference enforceable against North Carolina agencies as State law. Orange County Sensible Hwys. & Protected Env'ts, Inc. v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 46 N.C. App. 350, 265 S.E.2d 890, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2836 (1980).
§ 113A-11. Adoption of rules.
- The Department of Administration shall adopt rules to implement this Article.
- Each State agency shall adopt rules that establish minimum criteria. An agency may include a particular action or class of actions in its minimum criteria only if the agency makes a specific finding that the action or class of actions has no significant long-term impact on the environment. Rules establishing minimum criteria shall be consistent with rules adopted by the Department of Administration.
History. 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 899, s. 1; c. 945, s. 7(b); 2015-90, s. 4.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-90, s. 4, effective June 19, 2015, in subsection (b), substituted “shall adopt” for “may adopt” in the first sentence, substituted “long-term impact” for “impact” in the second sentence, and deleted the former last sentence, which read: “In addition to all other rule-making requirements, rules establishing minimum criteria are subject to approval by the Secretary of Administration.” For applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-12. Environmental document not required in certain cases.
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Article, no environmental document shall be required in connection with:
- The construction, maintenance, or removal of an electric power line, water line, sewage line, stormwater drainage line, telephone line, telegraph line, cable television line, data transmission line, natural gas line, or similar infrastructure project within or across the right-of-way of any street or highway.
-
An action approved under:
- A general permit issued under G.S. 113A-118.1 , 143-215.1(b)(3), or 143-215.108(c)(8).
- A Coastal Habitat Protection Plan under G.S. 143B-279.8.
- A special order pursuant to G.S. 143-215.2 or G.S. 143-215.110 .
- An action taken to address an emergency under G.S. 143-215.3 or other similar emergency conditions.
- A remedial or similar action to address contamination under Chapter 130A or 143 of the General Statutes, including a brownfield agreement entered into under G.S. 130A-310.32 .
- A certificate of convenience and necessity under G.S. 62-110 .
- An industrial or pollution control project approval by the Secretary of Commerce under Chapter 159C of the General Statutes.
- A project approved as a water infrastructure project under Chapter 159G of the General Statutes.
- A certification issued by the Division of Water Resources of the Department of Environmental Quality under the authority granted to the Environmental Management Commission by G.S. 143B-282(a)(1)u.
-
A lease or easement granted by a State agency for:
- The use of an existing building or facility.
- Placement of a wastewater line or other structures or uses on or under submerged lands pursuant to a permit granted under G.S. 143-215.1 .
- A shellfish cultivation lease granted under G.S. 113-202 .
- A facility for the use or benefit of The University of North Carolina System, the North Carolina community college system, the North Carolina public school systems, or one or more constituent institutions of any of those systems.
- A health care facility financed pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 131A of the General Statutes or receiving a certificate of need under Article 9 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes.
- The construction of a driveway connection to a public roadway.
- Any State action in connection with a project for which public lands are used and/or public monies are expended if the land or expenditure is provided as an incentive for the project pursuant to an agreement that makes the incentives contingent on prior completion of the project or activity, or completion on a specified timetable, and a specified level of job creation or new capital investment.
- A major development as defined in G.S. 113A-118 that receives a permit issued under Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
- The issuance of an executive order under G.S. 166A-19.30(a)(5) waiving the requirement for an environmental document.
- The redevelopment or reoccupation of an existing building or facility, so long as any additions to the existing building or facility do not increase the total footprint to more than one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the footprint of the existing building or facility and so long as any new construction does not increase the total footprint to more than one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the footprint of the existing building or facility.
- Facilities created in the course of facilitating closure activities under Part 2I of Article 9 of Chapter 130A of the General Statutes.
- Any project or facility specifically required or authorized by an act of the General Assembly.
- Any project undertaken as mitigation for the impacts of an approved project or to mitigate or avoid harm from natural environmental change, including wetlands and buffer mitigation projects and banks, coastal protections and mitigation projects, and noise mitigation projects.
History. 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, ss. 5, 7(a); c. 1030, s. 51.15; 2010-186, s. 1; 2010-188, s. 1; 2011-398, s. 59(a); 2014-90, s. 4; 2014-100, s. 14.7(j); 2015-90, s. 5; 2015-241, s. 14.30(c); 2019-240, s. 27.1(c).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2010-186, s. 2, as amended by Session Laws 2010-188, s. 1, made subdivision (5) of this section effective June 1, 2010, and not applicable to any project that was the subject of pending litigation or orders issued by a court of competent jurisdiction prior to that date concerning the application of the State Environmental Policy Act to projects receiving economic incentives.
Session Laws 2014-90, s. 4, and Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(j), amended this section in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . Each act added a new subdivision (7). At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, the subdivision added by Session Laws 2014-90, s. 4, has been renumbered as subdivision (8).
Session Laws 2014-90, s. 7, provides: “The Building Code Council, the Environmental Management Commission, the Coastal Management Commission, and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall amend their rules to conform with this act.”
Session Laws 2014-90, s. 8, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(c), effective July 1, 2015, provides: “The Department of Environment and Natural Resources is renamed the Department of Environmental Quality. All references to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources or the Department of Cultural Resources in acts of the 2015 General Assembly taking effect on or after the effective date of this section and in the Committee Report described in Section 33.2 of this act shall be construed to refer to the Department of Environmental Quality or the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, respectively. References to duties or requirements of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources with respect to entities transferred under subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall be construed as duties or requirements of the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources as reorganized by this section.” Pursuant to this authority, “Department of Environmental Quality” was substituted for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (2)i.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2010-186, s. 1, effective June 1, 2010, added subdivision (5). For applicability clause, see Editor’s note.
Session Laws 2011-398, s. 59(a), effective July 25, 2011, and applicable to any major development for which a permit application is received by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources on or after that date, added subdivision (6).
Session Laws 2014-90, s. 4, effective July 30, 2014, added subdivision (7) (now subdivision (8)).
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(j), effective July 1, 2014, added subdivision (7).
Session Laws 2015-90, s. 5, effective June 19, 2015, added “Notwithstanding any other provision in this Article” in the introductory language; substituted “natural gas line, or similar infrastructure project” for “or natural gas line ” in subdivision (1); redesignated former subdivision (2) as subdivision (2)a., added subdivisions (2)b. through (2)i., and made a related change; in subdivision (3), inserted “or other structures or uses” in subdivision (3)b., and added subdivisions (3)d. and (3)e.; rewrote subdivisions (5); and added subdivisions (9) through (11). For applicability, see editor’s note.
Session Laws 2019-240, s. 27.1(c), effective November 6, 2019, inserted “Article 1 of” in subdivision (3)e.
§ 113A-13. Administrative and judicial review.
The preparation of an environmental document required under this Article is intended to assist the responsible agency in determining the appropriate decision on the proposed action. An environmental document required under this Article is a necessary part of an application or other request for agency action. Administrative and judicial review of an environmental document is incidental to, and may only be undertaken in connection with, review of the agency action. No other review of an environmental document is allowed.
History. 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 945, ss. 5, 7(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Review Not Allowed. —
While condemned land owners were entitled to a review of whether the State transportation agency’s condemnation action was arbitrary and capricious, they could not obtain judicial review of the environmental documents created during the planning and selection of the proposed highway route as part of the judicial review of the condemnation. DOT v. Blue, 147 N.C. App. 596, 556 S.E.2d 609, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 1235 (2001).
§§ 113A-14 through 113A-20.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 2. Interstate Environmental Compact.
§ 113A-21. Title.
This Article shall be known and cited as “The Interstate Environmental Compact Act of 1971.”
History. 1971, c. 805, s. 1.
§ 113A-22. Purpose.
The General Assembly of North Carolina recognizes and declares:
- The concern for the purity and life-giving qualities of our environment is of primary interest to every citizen of North Carolina and to all Americans.
- The quality of our environment depends upon the management of the air, water, and land resources upon which our lives depend.
- The ultimate responsibility for the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of North Carolina rests upon the State government.
- The environment of every state is affected with local, state, regional, and national interests since ecological systems cross state boundaries.
- The discharge of this responsibility of environmental protection can be enhanced by acting in concert and cooperation with other states and with the federal government.
History. 1971, c. 805, s. 2.
§ 113A-23. Compact provisions.
The Interstate Environmental Compact is hereby enacted into law and entered into with all other jurisdictions legally joining herein in the form substantially as follows:
Article 1. Findings, Purposes and Reservations of Power.
- Findings. — Signatory states hereby find and declare:
- The environment of every state is affected with local, state, regional, and national interests and its protection, under appropriate arrangements for intergovernmental cooperation, are public purposes of the respective signatories.
- Certain environmental pollution problems transcend state boundaries and thereby become common to adjacent states requiring cooperative efforts.
-
The environment of each state is subject to the effective control of the signatories, and coordinated, cooperative or joint exercise of control measures is in their common interests.
(2) Purposes. — The purposes of the signatories in enacting this Compact are:
(a) To assist and participate in the national environment protection programs as set forth in federal legislation; to promote intergovernmental cooperation for multi-state action relating to environmental protection through interstate agreements; and to encourage cooperative and coordinated environmental protection by the signatories and the federal government;
(b) To preserve and utilize the functions, powers, and duties of existing state agencies of government to the maximum extent possible consistent with the purposes of the Compact.
(3) Powers of the United States. — (a) Nothing contained in this Compact shall impair, affect or extend the constitutional authority of the United States. (b) The signatories hereby recognize the power and right of the Congress of the United States at any time by any statute expressly enacted for that purpose to revise the terms and conditions of its content.
(4) Powers of the States. — Nothing contained in this Compact shall impair or extend the constitutional authority of any signatory state, nor shall the police powers of any signatory state be affected.
Article 2. Short Title, Definitions, Purposes and Limitations.
- Short Title. — This Compact shall be known and may be cited as the Interstate Environmental Compact.
-
Definitions. — For the purpose of this Compact and of any supplemental or concurring legislation enacted pursuant or in relation hereto, except as may be otherwise required by the context:
(a) “State” shall mean any one of the 50 states of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Territory of the Virgin Islands, but shall not include the District of Columbia.
(b) “Interstate environment pollution” shall mean any pollution of a stream or body of water crossing or marking a state boundary, interstate air quality control region designated by an appropriate federal agency or solid waste collection and disposal district or program involving the jurisdiction or territories of more than one state.
(c) “Government” shall mean the governments of the United States and the signatory states.
- “Federal government” shall mean the government of the United States of America and any appropriate department, instrumentality, agency, commission, bureau, division, branch or other unit thereof, as the case may be, but shall not include the District of Columbia.
-
“Signator” shall mean any state which enters into this Compact and is a party thereto.
Article 3. Intergovernmental Cooperation.
-
Agreements with the Federal Government and other Agencies. — Signatory states are hereby authorized jointly to participate in cooperative or joint undertakings for the protection of the interstate environment with the federal government or with any intergovernmental or interstate agencies.
Article 4. Supplementary Agreements, Jurisdiction and Enforcement.
(1) Signatories may enter into agreements for the purpose of controlling interstate environmental problems in accordance with applicable federal legislation and under terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the agreeing states under paragraph (6) and paragraph (8) of this Article 4.
- Recognition of Existing Nonenvironmental Intergovernmental Arrangements. — The signatories agree that existing federal-state, interstate or intergovernmental arrangements which are not primarily directed to environmental protection purposes as defined herein are not affected by this Compact.
- Recognition of Existing Intergovernmental Agreements Directed to Environmental Objectives. — All existing interstate compacts directly relating to environmental protection are hereby expressly recognized and nothing in this Compact shall be construed to diminish or supersede the powers and functions of such existing intergovernmental agreements and the organizations created by them.
- Modification of Existing Commissions and Compacts. — Recognition herein of multi-state commissions and compacts shall not be construed to limit directly or indirectly the creation of additional multi-state organizations or interstate compacts, nor to prevent termination, modification, extension, or supplementation of such multi-state organizations and interstate compacts recognized herein by the federal government or states party thereto.
- Recognition of Future Multi-State Commissions and Interstate Compacts. — Nothing in this Compact shall be construed to prevent signatories from entering into multi-state organizations or other interstate compacts which do not conflict with their obligations under this Compact.
- Supplementary Agreements. — Any two or more signatories may enter into supplementary agreements for joint, coordinated or mutual environmental management activities relating to interstate pollution problems common to the territories of such states and for the establishment of common or joint regulations, management, services, agencies or facilities for such purposes or may designate an appropriate agency to act as their joint agency in regard thereto. No supplementary agreement shall be valid to the extent that it conflicts with the purposes of this Compact and the creation of a joint agency by supplementary agreement shall not affect the privileges, powers, responsibilities or duties under this Compact of signatories participating therein as embodied in this Compact.
-
Execution of Supplementary Agreements and Effective Date. — The Governor is authorized to enter into supplementary agreements for the State and his official signature shall render the agreement immediately binding upon the State; provided that:
(a) The legislature of any signatory entering into such a supplementary agreement shall at any subsequent legislative session by concurrent resolution bring the supplementary agreement before it and by appropriate legislative action approve, reverse, modify, or condition the agreement of that state.
(b) Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to limit the right of Congress by act of law expressly enacted for that purpose to disapprove or condition such a supplementary agreement.
- Special Supplementary Agreements. — Signatories may enter into special supplementary agreements with the District of Columbia or foreign nations for the same purposes and with the same powers as under paragraph (6), Article 4, upon the conditions that such nonsignatory party accept the general obligations of signatories under this Compact. Provided, that such special supplementary agreements shall become effective only after being consented to by the Congress.
- Jurisdiction of Signatories Reserved. — Nothing in this Compact or in any supplementary agreement thereunder shall be construed to restrict, relinquish or be in derogation of, any power or authority constitutionally possessed by any signatory within its jurisdiction.
- Complementary Legislation by Signatories. — Signatories may enact such additional legislation as may be deemed appropriate to enable its officers and governmental agencies to accomplish effectively the purposes of this Compact and supplementary agreements recognized or entered into under the terms of this Article.
-
Legal Rights of Signatories. — Nothing in this Compact shall impair the exercise by any signatory of its legal rights or remedies established by the United States Constitution or any other laws of this nation.
Article 5. Construction, Amendment, and Effective Date.
(1) Construction. — It is the intent of the signatories that no provision of this Compact or supplementary agreement entered into hereunder shall be construed as invalidating any provision of law of any signatory and that nothing in this Compact shall be construed to modify or qualify the authority of any signatory to enact or enforce environmental protection legislation within its jurisdiction.
(2) Severability. — The provisions of this Compact or of agreements hereunder shall be severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence or provisions of this Compact, or such an agreement is declared to be contrary to the constitutionality of the remainder of this Compact or of any agreement and the applicability thereof to any participating jurisdiction, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining participating jurisdictions and in full force and effect as to the signatory affected as to all severable matters. It is the intent of the signatories that the provisions of this Compact shall be reasonably and liberally construed in the context of its purposes.
(3) Amendments. — Amendments to this Compact may be initiated by legislative action of any signatory and become effective when concurred in by all signatories and approved by Congress.
(4) Effective Date. — This Compact shall become binding on a state when enacted by it into law and such state shall thereafter become a signatory and party hereto with any and all states legally joining herein.
-
Agreements with the Federal Government and other Agencies. — Signatory states are hereby authorized jointly to participate in cooperative or joint undertakings for the protection of the interstate environment with the federal government or with any intergovernmental or interstate agencies.
History. 1971, c. 805, s. 3.
§§ 113A-24 through 113A-29.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 3. Natural and Scenic Rivers System. [Repealed]
§ 113A-30.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.140 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-31. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.142 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-32. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.144 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-33. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.146 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-34. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.148 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-35. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.150 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-35.1. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.152 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-35.2. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.154 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-36. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.156 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-37. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.158 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-38. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.160 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-39. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.162 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-40. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.164 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-41. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.166 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-42. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.168 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-43. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.170 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-44. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.172 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§§ 113A-45 through 113A-49.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 4. Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973.
§ 113A-50. Short title.
This Article shall be known as and may be cited as the “Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973.”
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 1.
Cross References.
For requirements necessitated by temporary implementation of federal Phase II Stormwater Management and the Stormwater Management Rules, see notes under G.S. 143-214.7 .
Express Review Pilot Program.
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 11.4A(a)-(e), provides: “(a) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may develop the Express Review Pilot Program, a pilot program to provide express permit and certification reviews. Participation in the Express Review Pilot Program is voluntary, and the program is to become supported by the fees determined pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall determine the project applications to review under the Express Review Pilot Program from those who request to participate in the Pilot Program. The Express Review Pilot Program may be applied to any one or all of the permits, approvals, or certifications in the following programs: the erosion and sedimentation control program, the coastal management program, and the water quality programs, including water quality certifications and stormwater management. The Express Review Pilot Program shall focus on the following permits or certifications:
“(1) Stormwater permits under Part 1 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(2) Stream origination certifications under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(3) Water quality certification under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(4) Erosion and sedimentation control permits under Article 4 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
“(5) Permits under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), Part 4 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
“(b) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish up to eight positions to administer the Express Review Pilot Program and may determine the fees for express application review under the Pilot Program. Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3 D, the maximum permit application fee to be charged under subsection (a) of this section for the express review of a project application requiring all of the permits under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500). Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3 D, the maximum permit application fee to be charged for the express review of a project application requiring all of the permits under subdivisions (1) through (4) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500). Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3D, the maximum permit application fee charged for the express review of a project application for any other combination of permits under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000). Express review of a project application involving additional permits or certifications issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources other than those under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section may be allowed by the Department, and, notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3D or any other statute or rule that sets a permit fee, the maximum permit application fee charged for the express review of a project application shall not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000), plus one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the fee that would otherwise apply by statute or rule for that particular permit or certification. Additional fees, not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the original permit application fee under this section, may be charged for subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit applications. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish the procedure by which the amount of the fees under this subsection is determined, and the fees and procedures are not rules under G.S. 150B-2(8a) for the Express Review Pilot Program under this section.
“(c) The funds appropriated to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in this act for the 2003-2004 fiscal year shall be used for the costs of implementing the Express Review Pilot Program under this section during the 2003-2004 fiscal year.
“(d) The Express Review Fund is created as a special nonreverting fund. The Express Review Fund shall be used for the costs of implementing the Express Review Pilot Program under this section. All fees collected under this section shall be credited to the Express Review Fund. If the Express Review Pilot Program is abolished, the funds in the Express Review Fund shall be credited to the General Fund.
“(e) No later than May 1, 2004, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall report to the General Assembly its findings on the success of the Express Review Pilot Program and whether it recommends that the Pilot Program be continued or expanded.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 12.9(a)-(f) provides: “(a) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall continue the Express Review Pilot Program established by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 that was implemented in the Wilmington and Raleigh regional offices and shall expand the Express Review Pilot Program to two additional regional offices within the Department, to be selected by the Department based on the Department’s determination of where the Pilot Program is most needed.
“(b) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall continue and support the eight positions that were authorized under Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. This expanded Program and these positions and support shall be funded from the Express Review Fund, created by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284.
“(c) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish and support four additional positions to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. These positions and support may be funded for the 2004-2005 fiscal year from funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for this purpose. It is the intent of the General Assembly that these positions and support be funded in future fiscal years from the Express Review Fund.
“(d) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish and support four additional positions to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. These positions and support shall be funded from the Express Review Fund, created by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284.
“(e) No later than March 1, 2005, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall report to the Fiscal Research Division and the Environmental Review Commission its findings on the success of the continued Express Pilot Review Program and whether it recommends that the Program be continued or expanded and any other findings or recommendations, including any legislative proposals, that it deems pertinent.
“(f) Subsection (c) of this section becomes effective January 1, 2005. The remaining subsections of this section become effective July 1, 2004.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 12.2(b), effective July 1, 2005, provides: “The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall expand to a statewide program that operates in each regional office of the Department the Express Review Pilot Program established by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 and expanded by Section 12.9 of S.L. 2004-124, and the provisions of G.S. 143B-279.13, as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, shall apply to this statewide program.”
For provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009, Session Laws 2009-406, see the notes under G.S. 153A-344.1 and G.S. 160A-385.1.
For provisions pertaining to extension of permits during state of economic emergency in the real estate sector, pursuant to Session Laws 2009-406, ss. 1 through 5.1, as amended by Session Laws 2009-484, s. 5.1, 2009-550, s. 5.2, 2009-572, ss. 1-3, and Session Laws 2010-177, s. 1, see notes appearing under this catchline at G.S. 160A-385.1.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2003’.”
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.5, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2004’.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 33.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2004-2005 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2004-2005 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 33.5, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2005’.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.5, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 9.14(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wind turbines and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. If Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, becomes law, the provisions of Part 12 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes as enacted by that act shall not apply to the facilities authorized by this section. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, did not become law.
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2009’.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.5 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(a), provides: “The General Assembly finds that strengthening research and development efforts on renewable energy sources is critical to North Carolina’s environment and economy, and that recent events resulting from the British Petroleum oil spill amplify the need for North Carolina’s innovators and scientists to enhance their efforts to develop sustainable energy sources and technologies that do not threaten the health and well-being of the State’s waters, sensitive lands, and residents. In order to provide opportunities for research into tidal, wave, and other ocean-based sources of alternative energy, the University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute shall form a consortium with the Colleges of Engineering at North Carolina State University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to study the capture of energy from ocean waves. The Coastal Studies Institute shall be designated the lead agency in coordinating these efforts. Funding appropriated by this act shall be used by university scientists to conceptualize, design, construct, operate, and market new and innovative technologies designed to harness and maximize the energy of the ocean in order to provide substantial power generation for the State. Funding may be used to leverage federal or private research funding for this purpose, but may not be used to purchase and utilize technology that has already been developed by others unless that technology is a critical component to North Carolina’s research efforts. Wave energy technologies developed and used for this research may be attached to or staged from an existing State-owned structure located in the ocean waters of the State, and data generated by these technologies shall be available at this structure for public education and awareness. It is the intent of the General Assembly that North Carolina become the focal point for marine-based ocean research collaborations involving the nation’s public and private universities.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wave energy facility and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2010’.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2010-2011 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.6, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2017-113, s. 3, provides: “The facility authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except as otherwise provided in this section. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this act shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: Articles 3 and 8 of Chapter 143, Articles 1 and 4 of Chapter 113A. Notwithstanding G.S. 146-11 and Article 16 of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes, the approval of the Council of State shall not be required for the granting of easements for the facility authorized under this act. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facility, the Department of Environmental Quality is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Session Laws 2020-97, s. 3.21(a)-(g), as amended by Session Laws 2021-3, s. 2.21(a), provides: ‘(a) Definitions. — As used in this section, the following definitions apply:
“(1) Development approval. — Any of the following approvals issued by any unit of local government, regardless of the form of the approval, that are for the development of land:
“a. Any approval of an erosion and sedimentation control plan granted by a local government under Article 4 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
“b. Any building permit issued under Article 9 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“c. Any approval by a county of sketch plans, preliminary plats, plats regarding a subdivision of land, a site-specific development plan or a phased development plan, a development permit, a development agreement, or a building permit under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes.
“d. Any approval by a city of sketch plans, preliminary plats, plats regarding a subdivision of land, a site-specific development plan or a phased development plan, a development permit, a development agreement, or a building permit under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes.
“e. Any certificate of appropriateness issued by a preservation commission of a city under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes.
“(2) Development. — The division of a parcel of land into two or more parcels; the construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any building or other structure or facility; or any grading, soil removal or relocation, excavation or landfill, or any use or change in the use of any building or other structure or land or extension of the use of land.
“(b) For any development approval that is current and valid at any point during the period beginning September 2, 2020, and ending 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded, the expiration date of the period of the development approval and any associated vested right under G.S. 160D-108 or G.S. 160D-108.1 is automatically extended 150 days from the date the Executive Order is rescinded.
“(c) This section shall not be construed or implemented to:
“(1) Extend any permit or approval issued by the United States or any of its agencies or instrumentalities.
“(2) Extend any permit or approval for which the term or duration of the permit or approval is specified or determined pursuant to federal law.
“(3) Shorten the duration that any development approval would have had in the absence of this section.
“(4) Prohibit the granting of such additional extensions as are provided by law.
“(5) Affect any administrative consent order issued by the Department of Environmental Quality in effect or issued at any time from the effective date of this section to 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded.
“(6) Affect the ability of a government entity to revoke or modify a development approval or to accept voluntary relinquishment of a development approval by the holder of the development approval pursuant to law.
“(7) Modify any requirement of law that is necessary to retain federal delegation by the State of the authority to implement a federal law or program.
“(8) Modify any person’s obligations or impair the rights of any party under contract, including bond or other similar undertaking.
“(9) Authorize the charging of a water or wastewater tap fee that has been previously paid in full for a project subject to a development approval.
“(d) The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes of this section.
“(e) For any development approval extended by this section, the holder of the development approval shall:
“(1) Comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies in effect at the time the development approval was originally issued by the governmental entity.
“(2) Maintain all performance guarantees that are imposed as a condition of the initial development approval for the duration of the period the development approval is extended or until affirmatively released from that obligation by the issuing governmental entity.
“(3) Complete any infrastructure necessary in order to obtain a certificate of occupancy or other final permit approval from the issuing governmental entity.
“(f) Failure to comply with any condition in this section may result in termination of the extension of the development approval by the issuing governmental entity. In the event of a termination of the extension of a development approval, the issuing governmental entity shall provide written notice to the last known address of the original holder of the development approval of the termination of the extension of the development approval, including the reason for the termination. Termination of an extension of a development approval shall be subject to appeal to the Board of Adjustment under the requirements set forth in law if the development approval was issued by a unit of local government with planning authority under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes.
“(g) This section is effective when it becomes law and expires 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded. Any development approval extended in accordance with subsection (b) of this section shall remain in effect until 150 days from the date the Executive Order is rescinded in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.”
Session Laws 2020-97, s. 4.5, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2021-3, s. 2.21(b), made the amendments to Session Laws 2020-97, s. 3.21(a)-(g), effective March 11, 2021, and applicable retroactively to vested rights existing on and after September 4, 2020.
Legal Periodicals.
For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).
CASE NOTES
Constitutional Considerations in Implementation of Regulatory Scheme. —
A major purpose of N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 3, is to reconcile the retention of judicial power in the judicial branch required by N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 1, with the recognized need to utilize administrative expertise in implementing complicated regulatory schemes such as this Article, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
The purpose of this Article is to control erosion and sedimentation, rather than only land-disturbing activities. Cox v. State ex rel. Summers, 81 N.C. App. 612, 344 S.E.2d 808, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2345 (1986).
This Article Provides Sufficient Guidance for Promulgation of Penalty Factors. —
This Article in general, and G.S. 113A-64 in particular, provides sufficient guidance for the department’s promulgation of penalty factors based on its experience and expertise in enforcing the Article; it is enough if general policies and standards have been articulated which are sufficient to provide direction to an administrative body possessing the expertise to adapt the legislative goals to varying circumstances. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Applicability of Article to Activities Occurring Before Article and Regulations Became Effective. —
To accomplish the purpose of this Article, the Article and the regulations enacted pursuant to it may be applied to land-disturbing activities which occurred before the Article and regulations became effective. Cox v. State ex rel. Summers, 81 N.C. App. 612, 344 S.E.2d 808, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2345 (1986).
Under this Article and the regulations enacted pursuant thereto, the developers of land, who still owned the roadway over which lot owners had an easement, could be held responsible for permanent erosion and sediment control measures in that roadway, even though the land-disturbing activity of the developers in developing the land occurred before the effective date of the regulations in question. Cox v. State ex rel. Summers, 81 N.C. App. 612, 344 S.E.2d 808, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2345 (1986).
Existence of Act is Evidence That Sedimentation is Considered a Pollutant. —
Based on the existence of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, reasonable persons in the grading and paving business should recognize that sedimentation is considered a pollutant and thus would fall within an exclusion in a commercial general liability policy and a commercial umbrella liability policy for pollution-related claims. Pennsylvania Nat'l Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Triangle Paving, Inc., 973 F. Supp. 560, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20196 (E.D.N.C. 1996), aff'd, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19274 (4th Cir. July 29, 1997).
Requirement of Deposit Into Body of Water. —
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim under the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA), because G.S. 113A-51 provided that sedimentation result from the erosion or depositing of materials into water, and it was clear that even a “land-disturbing activity” required an element of deposition into a body of water, no sediment was deposited into a body of water and the second requirement of a land-disturbing activity under the SPCA was that it may cause or contribute to sedimentation. Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 219 N.C. App. 462, 725 S.E.2d 360, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 400 (2012), modified, aff'd, 366 N.C. 518 , 742 S.E.2d 776, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 496 (2013).
§ 113A-51. Preamble.
The sedimentation of streams, lakes and other waters of this State constitutes a major pollution problem. Sedimentation occurs from the erosion or depositing of soil and other materials into the waters, principally from construction sites and road maintenance. The continued development of this State will result in an intensification of pollution through sedimentation unless timely and appropriate action is taken. Control of erosion and sedimentation is deemed vital to the public interest and necessary to the public health and welfare, and expenditures of funds for erosion and sedimentation control programs shall be deemed for a public purpose. It is the purpose of this Article to provide for the creation, administration, and enforcement of a program and for the adoption of minimal mandatory standards which will permit development of this State to continue with the least detrimental effects from pollution by sedimentation. In recognition of the desirability of early coordination of sedimentation control planning, it is the intention of the General Assembly that preconstruction conferences be held among the affected parties, subject to the availability of staff.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 2; 1975, c. 647, s. 3.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Assessment of Civil Penalty Held Constitutional. —
N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 3, did not prohibit the legislature from conferring on the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development (now Environment, Health, and Natural Resources) the power to exercise discretion in determining civil penalties within an authorized range; plenary guiding standards existed to check the exercise of the Department’s discretion in its assessment of civil penalties in varying amounts, commensurate with the seriousness of the violations of this Article, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Application to Activities Occurring Prior to Effective Date of Article. —
Application of this Article, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, to prevent erosion and sedimentation of public waters resulting from “land-disturbing” activities which occurred before the Article became effective does not constitute an unlawful retroactive application of the Article, since the purpose of the Article is to control erosion and sedimentation rather than only land-disturbing activities. State ex rel. Lee v. Penland-Bailey Co., 50 N.C. App. 498, 274 S.E.2d 348, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2147 (1981).
Legislative Intent. —
The stated legislative intent behind the enactment of the SPCA is to protect against the sedimentation of waterways. McHugh v. North Carolina Dep't of Envtl., Health & Natural Resources, 126 N.C. App. 469, 485 S.E.2d 861, 1997 N.C. App. LEXIS 562 (1997).
Requirement of Deposit Into Body of Water. —
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim under the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA), because G.S. 113A-51 provided that sedimentation result from the erosion or depositing of materials into water, and it was clear that even a “land-disturbing activity” required an element of deposition into a body of water, no sediment was deposited into a body of water and the second requirement of a land-disturbing activity under the SPCA was that it may cause or contribute to sedimentation. Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 219 N.C. App. 462, 725 S.E.2d 360, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 400 (2012), modified, aff'd, 366 N.C. 518 , 742 S.E.2d 776, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 496 (2013).
§ 113A-52. Definitions.
As used in this Article, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1417, s. 1.
(1a) “Affiliate” has the same meaning as in 17 Code of Federal Regulations § 240.12(b)-2 (1 June 1993 Edition), which defines “affiliate” as a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control of another person.
- “Commission” means the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
- “Department” means the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.
- “District” means any Soil and Water Conservation District created pursuant to Chapter 139, North Carolina General Statutes.
- “Erosion” means the wearing away of land surface by the action of wind, water, gravity, or any combination thereof.
- “Land-disturbing activity” means any use of the land by any person in residential, industrial, educational, institutional or commercial development, highway and road construction and maintenance that results in a change in the natural cover or topography and that may cause or contribute to sedimentation.
-
“Local government” means any county, incorporated village, town, or city, or any combination of counties, incorporated villages, towns, and cities, acting through a joint program pursuant to the provisions of this Article.
(7a) “Parent” has the same meaning as in 17 Code of Federal Regulations § 240.12(b)-2 (1 June 1993 Edition), which defines “parent” as an affiliate that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls another person.
- “Person” means any individual, partnership, firm, association, joint venture, public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative, interstate body, or other legal entity.
- “Secretary” means the Secretary of Environmental Quality.
-
“Sediment” means solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air, gravity, or ice from its site of origin.
(10a) “Subsidiary” has the same meaning as in 17 Code of Federal Regulations § 240.12(b)-2 (1 June 1993 Edition), which defines “subsidiary” as an affiliate that is directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlled by another person.
(10b) “Tract” means all contiguous land and bodies of water being disturbed or to be disturbed as a unit, regardless of ownership.
- “Working days” means days exclusive of Saturday and Sunday during which weather conditions or soil conditions permit land-disturbing activity to be undertaken.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 3; c. 1417, s. 1; 1975, c. 647, s. 1; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1989, c. 179, s. 1; c. 727, s. 218(60); 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1004, s. 19(b); 1991, c. 275, s. 1; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 1; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), (v).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional and temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u) and (v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (3) and “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (9).
CASE NOTES
Activities That Are Not Temporary and Minimal. —
In a case in which two property owners and an environmental group appealed a decision by a trial court, they were correct that the trial court erred in concluding that the land-disturbing activities by a country club owner in building a nine-hole golf course were temporary and minimal and thus authorized by G.S. 113A-57(1). The trial court’s finding that the country club owner would only be conducting a land-disturbing activity while doing construction in the trout buffer was not supported by competent evidence in the record. Hensley v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 201 N.C. App. 1, 685 S.E.2d 570, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1853 (2009), rev'd, 364 N.C. 285 , 698 S.E.2d 41, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 586 (2010).
Requirement of Deposit Into Body of Water. —
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim under the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA), because G.S. 113A-51 provided that sedimentation result from the erosion or depositing of materials into water, and it was clear that even a “land-disturbing activity” required an element of deposition into a body of water, no sediment was deposited into a body of water and the second requirement of a land-disturbing activity under the SPCA was that it may cause or contribute to sedimentation. Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 219 N.C. App. 462, 725 S.E.2d 360, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 400 (2012), modified, aff'd, 366 N.C. 518 , 742 S.E.2d 776, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 496 (2013).
Improper Grant of Variance. —
In a case in which two property owners and an environmental group appealed a decision by a trial court, they were correct that the trial court erred in concluding that the land-disturbing activities by a country club owner were temporary and minimal and thus authorized by G.S. 113A-57(1). The land-disturbing activities conducted by the country club owner during construction of a nine-hole golf course were not minimal and no variance should have been granted by the N.C. Sedimentation Control Commission. Hensley v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 201 N.C. App. 1, 685 S.E.2d 570, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1853 (2009), rev'd, 364 N.C. 285 , 698 S.E.2d 41, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 586 (2010).
§ 113A-52.01. Applicability of this Article.
This Article shall not apply to the following land-disturbing activities:
-
Activities, including the production and activities relating or incidental to the production of crops, grains, fruits, vegetables, ornamental and flowering plants, dairy, livestock, poultry, and all other forms of agriculture undertaken on agricultural land for the production of plants and animals useful to man, including, but not limited to:
- Forages and sod crops, grains and feed crops, tobacco, cotton, and peanuts.
- Dairy animals and dairy products.
- Poultry and poultry products.
- Livestock, including beef cattle, llamas, sheep, swine, horses, ponies, mules, and goats.
- Bees and apiary products.
- Fur producing animals.
- Mulch, ornamental plants, and other horticultural products. For purposes of this section, “mulch” means substances composed primarily of plant remains or mixtures of such substances.
- Activities undertaken on forestland for the production and harvesting of timber and timber products and conducted in accordance with standards defined by the Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality, as adopted by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
- Activities for which a permit is required under the Mining Act of 1971, Article 7 of Chapter 74 of the General Statutes.
- For the duration of an emergency, activities essential to protect human life, including activities specified in an executive order issued under G.S. 166A-19.30(a)(5).
- Activities undertaken to restore the wetland functions of converted wetlands to provide compensatory mitigation to offset impacts permitted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
- Activities undertaken pursuant to Natural Resources Conservation Service standards to restore the wetlands functions of converted wetlands as defined in Title 7 Code of Federal Regulations § 12.2 (January 1, 2014 Edition).
History. 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 2; 1997-84, s. 1; 2014-100, s. 14.7(k); 2015-263, s. 19; 2016-113, s. 14; 2017-108, s. 6(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(k), effective July 1, 2014, added “including activities specified in an executive order issued under G.S. 166A-19.30(a)(5)” at the end of subdivision (4).
Session Laws 2015-263, s. 19, effective September 30, 2015, added subdivisions (5) and (6).
Session Laws 2016-113, s. 14, effective July 26, 2016, substituted “production and activities relating or incidental to the production of crops, grains, fruits, vegetables, ornamental and flowering plants, dairy, livestock, poultry, and all other forms of agriculture” for “breeding and grazing of livestock” at the beginning of subsection (1); and added subdivision (1)(g).
Session Laws 2017-108, s. 6(a), effective July 12, 2017, in subdivision (2), substituted “standards defined by the” for “best management practices set out in” and substituted “Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services” for “Department.”
CASE NOTES
Statute Did Not Affect Market Valuation of Forestland. —
Assessment of the market value of a taxpayer’s forestland was upheld, despite the taxpayer’s claim that the assessment did not sufficiently account for restrictions imposed by the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Act, G.S. 113A-52.01 , because the Act did not apply to land used for forestry. In re Appeal of Family Tree Farm, LLC, 218 N.C. App. 577, 721 S.E.2d 387, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 215 (2012).
§ 113A-52.1. Forest Practice Guidelines.
- The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall adopt Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality (best management practices). The adoption of Forest Practices Guidelines Related to Water Quality under this section is subject to the provisions of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
- If land-disturbing activity undertaken on forestland for the production and harvesting of timber and timber products is not conducted in accordance with Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality, the provisions of this Article shall apply to such activity and any related land-disturbing activity on the tract.
- The Commissioner shall establish and appoint a Forestry Technical Advisory Committee to assist in the development and periodic review of Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality. The Forestry Technical Advisory Committee shall consist of one member from the forest products industry, one member who is a consulting forester, one member who is a private landowner knowledgeable in forestry, one member from the United States Forest Service, one member from the academic community who is knowledgeable in forestry, one member employed by the Department of Environmental Quality who is knowledgeable in erosion and sedimentation control, one member who is knowledgeable in wildlife management, one member who is knowledgeable in marine fisheries management, one member who is knowledgeable in water quality, and one member from the conservation community.
History. 1989, c. 179, s. 2; 2017-108, s. 6(b).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2017-108, s. 6(b), effective July 12, 2017, substituted “Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services” for “Department” in subsection (a); in subsection (c), substituted “Commissioner” for “Secretary”, inserted “and appoint a Forestry” in the first sentence, substituted “Forestry Technical Advisory Committee” for “Technical Advisory Committee” in the first and last sentences, and added “employed by the Department of Environmental Quality” in the last sentence.
§ 113A-53. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 41.
Cross References.
For this section as amended by Session Laws 1973, c. 1417, s. 2, see the note to G.S. 143B-299.
As to creation and organization of the Sedimentation Control Commission, see G.S. 143B-298, 143B-299.
§ 113A-54. Powers and duties of the Commission.
- The Commission shall, in cooperation with the Secretary of Transportation and other appropriate State and federal agencies, develop, promulgate, publicize, and administer a comprehensive State erosion and sedimentation control program.
- The Commission shall develop and adopt and shall revise as necessary from time to time, rules and regulations for the control of erosion and sedimentation resulting from land-disturbing activities. The Commission shall adopt or revise its rules and regulations in accordance with Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
-
The rules and regulations adopted pursuant to
G.S. 113A-54(b)
for carrying out the erosion and sedimentation control program shall:
- Be based upon relevant physical and developmental information concerning the watershed and drainage basins of the State, including, but not limited to, data relating to land use, soils, hydrology, geology, grading, ground cover, size of land area being disturbed, proximate water bodies and their characteristics, transportation, and public facilities and services;
- Include such survey of lands and waters as may be deemed appropriate by the Commission or required by any applicable laws to identify those areas, including multijurisdictional and watershed areas, with critical erosion and sedimentation problems; and
- Contain conservation standards for various types of soils and land uses, which standards shall include criteria and alternative techniques and methods for the control of erosion and sedimentation resulting from land-disturbing activities.
-
In implementing the erosion and sedimentation control program, the Commission shall:
- Assist and encourage local governments in developing erosion and sedimentation control programs and, as a part of this assistance, the Commission shall develop a model local erosion and sedimentation control ordinance. The Commission shall approve, approve as modified, or disapprove local programs submitted to it pursuant to G.S. 113A-60 .
- Assist and encourage other State agencies in developing erosion and sedimentation control programs to be administered in their jurisdictions. The Commission shall approve, approve as modified, or disapprove programs submitted pursuant to G.S. 113A-56 and from time to time shall review these programs for compliance with rules adopted by the Commission and for adequate enforcement.
- Develop recommended methods of control of sedimentation and prepare and make available for distribution publications and other materials dealing with sedimentation control techniques appropriate for use by persons engaged in land-disturbing activities, general educational materials on erosion and sedimentation control, and instructional materials for persons involved in the enforcement of this Article and erosion and sedimentation control rules, ordinances, regulations, and plans.
- Require submission of erosion and sedimentation control plans by those responsible for initiating land-disturbing activities for approval prior to commencement of the activities.
- To assist it in developing the erosion and sedimentation control program required by this Article, the Commission is authorized to appoint an advisory committee consisting of technical experts in the fields of water resources, soil science, engineering, and landscape architecture.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 10, effective August 13, 1987.
- The Commission is authorized to make the final decision on a request for the remission of a civil penalty under G.S. 113A-64.2 .
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 5; c. 1331, s. 3; c. 1417, s. 6; 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, s. 74; 1977, c. 464, s. 35; 1979, c. 922, s. 2; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1014, ss. 1, 2; 1987, c. 827, s. 10; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 3; 1989, c. 676, s. 1; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 3; 2002-165, ss. 2.2, 2.3; 2015-241, s. 14.26(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(e), made subsection (g) of this section as added by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(a), applicable to civil penalties assessed and notices of violation issued on or after September 18, 2015.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(a), effective September 18, 2015, added subsection (g). For applicability, see editor’s note.
CASE NOTES
Applicability of Article to Activities Occurring Before Article and Regulations Became Effective. —
To accomplish the purpose of this Article, the Article and the regulations enacted pursuant to it may be applied to land-disturbing activities which occurred before the Article and regulations became effective. Cox v. State ex rel. Summers, 81 N.C. App. 612, 344 S.E.2d 808, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2345 (1986).
Under this Article and the regulations enacted pursuant thereto, the developers of land, who still owned the roadway over which lot owners had an easement, could be held responsible for permanent erosion and sediment control measures in that roadway, even though the land-disturbing activity of the developers in developing the land occurred before the effective date of the regulations in question. Cox v. State ex rel. Summers, 81 N.C. App. 612, 344 S.E.2d 808, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2345 (1986).
Scope. —
G.S. 113A-54(b) authorizes the Sedimentation Control Commission to adopt rules and regulations for the control of erosion and sedimentation resulting from land-disturbing activities, and this authority is not limited to circumstances where sedimentation actually reaches a waterway; consistent with the authority set forth in G.S. 113A-54(b) , the Commission has adopted rules that regulate all land-disturbing activities, with some exceptions, and the rules promulgated pursuant to the authority set forth by G.S. 113A-54(b) are implicated regardless of whether G.S. 113A-57(1), limiting land-disturbing activities, is applicable. Williams v. Allen, 182 N.C. App. 121, 641 S.E.2d 391, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 483 (2007).
§ 113A-54.1. Approval of erosion control plans.
-
A draft erosion and sedimentation control plan must contain the applicant’s address and, if the applicant is not a resident of North Carolina, designate a North Carolina agent for the purpose of receiving notice from the Commission or the Secretary of compliance or noncompliance with the plan, this Article, or any rules adopted pursuant to this Article. Except as provided in subsection (a1) of this section, if the applicant is not the owner of the land to be disturbed, the draft erosion and sedimentation control plan must include the owner’s written consent for the applicant to submit a draft erosion and sedimentation control plan and to conduct the anticipated land-disturbing activity. The Commission shall approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a draft erosion and sedimentation control plan for those land-disturbing activities for which prior plan approval is required within 30 days of receipt. The Commission shall condition approval of a draft erosion and sedimentation control plan upon the applicant’s compliance with federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a completed draft erosion and sedimentation control plan within 30 days of receipt shall be deemed approval of the plan. If the Commission disapproves a draft erosion and sedimentation control plan or a revised erosion and sedimentation control plan, it must state in writing the specific reasons that the plan was disapproved. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised erosion and sedimentation control plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval of the plan. The Commission may establish an expiration date for erosion and sedimentation control plans approved under this Article.
(a1) If the applicant is not the owner of the land to be disturbed and the anticipated land-disturbing activity involves the construction of utility lines for the provision of water, sewer, gas, telecommunications, or electrical service, the draft erosion and sedimentation control plan may be submitted without the written consent of the owner of the land, so long as the owner of the land has been provided prior notice of the project.
- If, following commencement of a land-disturbing activity pursuant to an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan, the Commission determines that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of this Article, the Commission may require any revision of the plan that is necessary to comply with this Article. Failure to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove a revised erosion and sedimentation control plan within 15 days of receipt shall be deemed approval of the plan.
-
The Commission shall disapprove an erosion and sedimentation control plan if implementation of the plan would result in a violation of rules adopted by the Environmental Management Commission to protect riparian buffers along surface waters. The Director of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources may disapprove an erosion and sedimentation control plan or disapprove a transfer of a plan under subsection (d1) of this section upon finding that an applicant or a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of the applicant:
- Is conducting or has conducted land-disturbing activity without an approved plan, or has received notice of violation of a plan previously approved by the Commission or a local government pursuant to this Article and has not complied with the notice within the time specified in the notice;
- Has failed to pay a civil penalty assessed pursuant to this Article or a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article by the time the payment is due;
- Has been convicted of a misdemeanor pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(b) or any criminal provision of a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article; or
- Has failed to substantially comply with State rules or local ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant to this Article.
-
In the event that an erosion and sedimentation control plan or a transfer of a plan is disapproved by the Director pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, the Director shall state in writing the specific reasons that the plan was disapproved. The applicant or the proposed transferee may appeal the Director’s disapproval of the plan to the Commission. For purposes of this subsection and subsection (c) of this section, an applicant’s record or a proposed transferee’s record may be considered for only the two years prior to the application date.
(d1) The Department may transfer an erosion and sedimentation control plan approved pursuant to this section without the consent of the plan holder to a successor-owner of the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur as provided in this subsection:
-
The Department may transfer a plan if all of the following conditions are met:
- The successor-owner of the property submits to the Department a written request for the transfer of the plan and an authorized statement of financial responsibility and ownership.
-
The Department finds all of the following:
-
The plan holder is one of the following:
- A natural person who is deceased.
- A partnership, limited liability corporation, corporation, or any other business association that has been dissolved.
- A person who has been lawfully and finally divested of title to the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- A person who has sold the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- The successor-owner holds title to the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- The successor-owner is the sole claimant of the right to engage in the permitted activity.
-
There will be no substantial change in the permitted activity.
(2) The plan holder shall comply with all terms and conditions of the plan until such time as the plan is transferred.
(3) The successor-owner shall comply with all terms and conditions of the plan once the plan has been transferred.
(4) Notwithstanding changes to law made after the original issuance of the plan, the Department may not impose new or different terms and conditions in the plan without the prior express consent of the successor-owner. Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the Commission from requiring a revised plan pursuant to G.S. 113A-54.1(b).
-
The plan holder is one of the following:
-
The Department may transfer a plan if all of the following conditions are met:
- The landowner, the financially responsible party, or the landowner’s or the financially responsible party’s agent shall perform an inspection of the area covered by the plan after each phase of the plan has been completed and after establishment of temporary ground cover in accordance with G.S. 113A-57(2). The person who performs the inspection shall maintain and make available a record of the inspection at the site of the land-disturbing activity. The record shall set out any significant deviation from the approved erosion control plan, identify any measures that may be required to correct the deviation, and document the completion of those measures. The record shall be maintained until permanent ground cover has been established as required by the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan. The inspections required by this subsection shall be in addition to inspections required by G.S. 113A-61.1 .
- For land-disturbing activities on a single-family residential lot involving new construction with land disturbance of less than one acre where the builder or developer is the owner of the lot being developed and the person financially responsible for the land-disturbing activity, the financial responsibility for land-disturbing activity on that lot transfers to the new owner upon the builder’s or developer’s conveyance of the lot to the new owner, recording of the deed in the office of the register of deeds, and notification to the office or local program that approved the erosion control plan.
History. 1989, c. 676, s. 2; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 4; 1998-221, s. 1.11(a); 1999-379, s. 1; 2005-386, s. 7.1; 2006-250, s. 1; 2011-394, s. 3; 2012-143, s. 1(f); 2013-121, s. 3; 2021-121, s. 5(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section. The Codifier of Rules shall make the conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2005-386, s. 7.1, effective January 1, 2006, inserted “and sedimentation” preceding “control plan” throughout the section; and added the second sentence in subsection (a).
Session Laws 2006-250, s. 1, effective September 1, 2006, added subsection (e).
Session Laws 2011-394, s. 3, effective July 1, 2011, added the exception at the beginning of the second sentence in subsection (a); and added subsection (a1).
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), substituted “Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources” for “Division of Land Resources” in subsection (c).
Session Laws 2013-121, s. 3, effective June 19, 2013, added “or disapprove a transfer of a plan under subsection (d1) of this section” in the second sentence of subsection (c); in subsection (d), added “or transfer of a plan” in the first sentence, in the second sentence “or the proposed transferee,” and in the third sentence “or a proposed transferee’s record”; and added subsection (d1).
Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(a), effective August 30, 2021, added subsection (f).
§ 113A-54.2. Approval Fees.
- An application and compliance fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per acre of disturbed land shown on an erosion and sedimentation control plan or of land actually disturbed during the life of the project shall be charged for the review of an erosion and sedimentation control plan and related compliance activities under this Article.
- The Sedimentation Account is established as a nonreverting account within the Department. Fees collected under this section shall be credited to the Account and shall be applied to the costs of administering this Article.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1039, s. 3.
- G.S. 113A-60 governs the authority of local programs approved pursuant to this Article to assess fees for the review of erosion and sedimentation control plans.
History. 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 906, s. 1; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1039, s. 3; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 5; 1999-379, s. 5; 2002-165, s. 2.4; 2007-323, s. 30.1(a); 2021-121, s. 5(b); 2021-180, s. 12.10A(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2007-323, s. 30.1(a), effective August 1, 2007, and applicable to applications submitted on or after that date, in subsection (a), deleted the former first two sentences which read: “The Commission may establish a fee schedule for the review and approval of erosion and sedimentation control plans under this Article. In establishing the fee schedule, the Commission shall consider the administrative and personnel costs incurred by the Department for reviewing the plans and for related compliance activities.”, substituted “of sixty-five dollars ($65.00)” for “may not exceed fifty dollars ($50.00)” near the beginning and added “shall be charged for the review of an erosion and sedimentation control plan under this Article” at the end.
Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(b), effective August 30, 2021, in subsection (d), substituted “G.S. 113A-60 governs the” for “This section may not limit the existing” and “review” for “approval.”
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 12.10A(a), effective November 18, 2021, in subsection (a), inserted “and compliance”, substituted “one hundred dollars ($100.00)” for “sixty-five dollars ($65.00)”, and inserted “and related compliance activities” near the end.
§ 113A-55. Authority of the Secretary.
The sedimentation control program developed by the Commission shall be administered by the Secretary under the direction of the Commission. To this end the Secretary shall employ the necessary clerical, technical, and administrative personnel, and assign tasks to the various divisions of the Department for the purpose of implementing this Article. The Secretary may bring enforcement actions pursuant to G.S. 113A-64 and G.S. 113A-65 . The Secretary shall make final agency decisions in contested cases that arise from civil penalty assessments pursuant to G.S. 113A-64 .
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 6; c. 1417, s. 3; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 6.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-56. Jurisdiction of the Commission.
-
The Commission shall have jurisdiction, to the exclusion of local governments, to adopt rules concerning land-disturbing activities that are:
- Conducted by the State.
- Conducted by the United States.
- Conducted by persons having the power of eminent domain other than a local government.
- Conducted by a local government.
- Funded in whole or in part by the State or the United States.
- The Commission may delegate the jurisdiction conferred by G.S. 113A-56(a), in whole or in part, to any other State agency that has submitted an erosion and sedimentation control program to be administered by it, if the program has been approved by the Commission as being in conformity with the general State program.
-
The Commission shall have concurrent jurisdiction with local governments that administer a delegated erosion and sedimentation control program over all other land-disturbing activities. In addition to the authority granted to the Commission in
G.S. 113A-60(c)
, the Commission has the following authority with respect to a delegated erosion and sedimentation control program:
- To review erosion and sedimentation control plan approvals made by a delegated erosion and sedimentation control program and to require a revised plan if the Commission determines that a plan does not comply with the requirements of this Article or the rules adopted pursuant to this Article.
- To review the compliance activities of a delegated erosion and sedimentation control program and to take appropriate compliance action if the Commission determines that the local government has failed to take appropriate compliance action.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 7; c. 1417, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 130; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 4; 2002-165, s. 2.5; 2006-250, s. 2.
Local Modification.
City of Raleigh: 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1043, s. 1.
Editor’s Note.
Subsection (a) was amended by Session Laws 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 4, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . It has been set out in the form above at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2006-250, s. 2, effective September 1, 2006, added “other than a local government” at the end of subdivision (a)(3); in subsection (c), inserted “that administer a delegated erosion and sedimentation control program” in the first sentence, added the second sentence, and added subdivisions (c)(1) and (c)(2); and made minor stylistic changes.
CASE NOTES
Funded by Governmental Entity. —
If the State or United States provides a sum of money to be used for the purpose of construction, which involves some “land-disturbing activity,” the governmental entity has “funded” that “land-disturbing activity” within the meaning of subdivision (a)(5). City of Asheville v. Woodberry Assocs., 114 N.C. App. 377, 442 S.E.2d 328, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 387 (1994).
Use of Funds. —
Even though construction project received a $15,000 grant from the North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, the project was not partially “funded” by the United States; although a grant, funded with either federal or state monies, does qualify as funding, in this instance, however, the grant monies were not used to fund any “land-disturbing” activities on the project site. The money from the grant was to be used, and was, in fact, used to install water and sewer lines to the project site. City of Asheville v. Woodberry Assocs., 114 N.C. App. 377, 442 S.E.2d 328, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 387 (1994).
Loan Insured by HUD. —
Even though the loan on project site was insured by United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) it was not “funded” by the United States; HUD’s insuring of the loan involved some federal spending but that money was not used for the construction of the project but was instead used to induce some other party to provide money for the construction of the project. City of Asheville v. Woodberry Assocs., 114 N.C. App. 377, 442 S.E.2d 328, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 387 (1994).
§ 113A-57. Mandatory standards for land-disturbing activity.
No land-disturbing activity subject to this Article shall be undertaken except in accordance with the following mandatory requirements:
- No land-disturbing activity during periods of construction or improvement to land shall be permitted in proximity to a lake or natural watercourse unless a buffer zone is provided along the margin of the watercourse of sufficient width to confine visible siltation within the twenty-five percent (25%) of the buffer zone nearest the land-disturbing activity. Waters that have been classified as trout waters by the Environmental Management Commission shall have an undisturbed buffer zone 25 feet wide or of sufficient width to confine visible siltation within the twenty-five percent (25%) of the buffer zone nearest the land-disturbing activity, whichever is greater. Provided, however, that the Sedimentation Control Commission may approve plans which include land-disturbing activity along trout waters when the duration of said disturbance would be temporary and the extent of said disturbance would be minimal. This subdivision shall not apply to a land-disturbing activity in connection with the construction of facilities to be located on, over, or under a lake or natural watercourse.
- The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle that can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion-control devices or structures. In any event, slopes left exposed will, within 21 calendar days of completion of any phase of grading, be planted or otherwise provided with temporary or permanent ground cover, devices, or structures sufficient to restrain erosion.
- Whenever land-disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre is undertaken on a tract, the person conducting the land-disturbing activity shall install erosion and sedimentation control devices and practices that are sufficient to retain the sediment generated by the land-disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during construction upon and development of the tract, and shall plant or otherwise provide a permanent ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion after completion of construction or development within a time period to be specified by rule of the Commission.
- No person shall initiate any land-disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre on a tract unless, 30 or more days prior to initiating the activity, an erosion and sedimentation control plan for the activity is filed with the agency having jurisdiction and approved by the agency. An erosion and sedimentation control plan may be filed less than 30 days prior to initiation of a land-disturbing activity if the plan is submitted under an approved express permit program, and the land-disturbing activity may be initiated and conducted in accordance with the plan once the plan has been approved. The agency having jurisdiction shall forward to the Director of the Division of Water Resources a copy of each erosion and sedimentation control plan for a land-disturbing activity that involves the utilization of ditches for the purpose of de-watering or lowering the water table of the tract.
- The land-disturbing activity shall be conducted in accordance with the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 8; c. 1417, s. 5; 1975, c. 647, s. 2; 1979, c. 564; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1014, s. 3; 1987, c. 827, s. 131; 1989, c. 676, s. 3; 1991, c. 275, s. 2; 1998-99, s. 1; 1999-379, s. 2; 2002-165, s. 2.6; 2005-386, s. 7.2; 2005-443, s. 2; 2006-255, s. 2; 2006-264, s. 53(a); 2013-413, s. 57(f).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2006-264, s. 53(a), added a subdivision (5) identical to that added by Session Laws 2006-255, s. 2, but was repealed pursuant to the terms of Session Laws 2006-264, s. 53(b), which provided that if Session Laws 2006-255 became law, 2006-264, s. 53 is repealed.
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(b), provides: “Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law [August 23, 2013].” Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), had provided that: “This act becomes effective July 1, 2015.” Session Laws 2014-115, s. 17, amended Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), to replace the reference to “This act” with the words “This Part.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(a), is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2005-386, s. 7.2, effective January 1, 2006, substituted “that will disturb more than one acre is undertaken on a tract” for “is undertaken on a tract comprising more than one acre, if more than one acre is uncovered” in subdivision (3); in subdivision (4), substituted “that will disturb more than one acre on a tract” for “on a tract if more than one acre is to be uncovered” and added “and approved by the agency” at the end of the first sentence, and added the present second sentence; and made minor stylistic and punctuation changes.
Session Laws 2005-441, s. 1, effective October 1, 2005, in subdivision (2), substituted “21” for “15 working days or 30,” deleted “whichever period is shorter” following “any phase of grading” and inserted “temporary or permanent” following “or otherwise provided with.”
Session Laws 2006-255, s. 2, effective August 23, 2006, added subdivision (5).
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 57(f), substituted “Resources” for “Quality” in subdivision (4). For effective date, see editor’s note.
Legal Periodicals.
For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).
CASE NOTES
Legislative Intent. —
Had the General assembly also wished subdivisions (1) and (2) to contain a one acre requirement they could have added it to these sections. McHugh v. North Carolina Dep't of Envtl., Health & Natural Resources, 126 N.C. App. 469, 485 S.E.2d 861, 1997 N.C. App. LEXIS 562 (1997).
Applicability of One Acre Requirement. —
Although subdivisions (3) and (4) contain a requirement that more than one acre of land must be uncovered before a violation will be found, the one acre requirement does not apply to subsections (1) and (2). McHugh v. North Carolina Dep't of Envtl., Health & Natural Resources, 126 N.C. App. 469, 485 S.E.2d 861, 1997 N.C. App. LEXIS 562 (1997).
When a landowner sued a developer and a land grader for violating the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA), it was error for a trial court to rule, as a matter of law, that the developer and grader could not be liable under the SPCA because the lot on which they conducted their activities, of which the landowner complained, was smaller than one acre, because while the provisions of G.S. 113A-57(3) and (4) only applied to one acre or more of land, G.S. 113A-57(1) and (2) contained no such limitation. Williams v. Allen, 182 N.C. App. 121, 641 S.E.2d 391, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 483 (2007).
While G.S. 113A-57(3) and (4), placing conditions on land-disturbing activity, expressly condition their application on land-disturbing activity that disturbs more than one acre, G.S. 113A-57(1) and (2) contain no such limitation, as G.S. 113A-57(2), which sets out a standard for “graded slopes and fills,” does not include any acreage requirement, and G.S. 113A-57(1) applies to any land-disturbing activity “in proximity to a lake or natural watercourse” without regard to the size of the land area that is disturbed. Williams v. Allen, 182 N.C. App. 121, 641 S.E.2d 391, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 483 (2007).
Application to Activities Occurring Prior to Effective Date of Article. —
Application of this Article, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, to prevent erosion and sedimentation of public waters resulting from “land-disturbing” activities which occurred before the Article became effective does not constitute an unlawful retroactive application of the Article, since the purpose of the Article is to control erosion and sedimentation rather than only land-disturbing activities. State ex rel. Lee v. Penland-Bailey Co., 50 N.C. App. 498, 274 S.E.2d 348, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2147 (1981).
Ownership of Land. —
This section does not require that the party causing the disturbance has to own more than one acre of the land being uncovered. Midway Grading Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of Env't, Health & Natural Resources, 123 N.C. App. 501, 473 S.E.2d 20, 1996 N.C. App. LEXIS 701 (1996).
Activities That Are Not Temporary and Minimal. —
In a case in which two property owners and an environmental group appealed a decision by a trial court, they were correct that the trial court erred in concluding that the land-disturbing activities by a country club owner in building a nine-hole golf course were temporary and minimal and thus authorized by G.S. 113A-57(1). The trial court’s finding that the country club owner would only be conducting a land-disturbing activity while doing construction in the trout buffer was not supported by competent evidence in the record. Hensley v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 201 N.C. App. 1, 685 S.E.2d 570, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1853 (2009), rev'd, 364 N.C. 285 , 698 S.E.2d 41, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 586 (2010).
Improper Grant of Variance. —
In a case in which two property owners and an environmental group appealed a decision by a trial court, they were correct that the trial court erred in concluding that the land-disturbing activities by a country club owner in building a nine-hole golf course were temporary and minimal and thus authorized by G.S. 113A-57(1). Pursuant to G.S. 113A-57(1) and 15A N.C. Admin. Code 4A.0105(26), the land-disturbing activities conducted by the country club owner during construction of a nine-hole golf course were not minimal, and no variance should have been granted by the N.C. Sedimentation Control Commission. Hensley v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 201 N.C. App. 1, 685 S.E.2d 570, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1853 (2009), rev'd, 364 N.C. 285 , 698 S.E.2d 41, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 586 (2010).
§ 113A-58. Enforcement authority of the Commission.
In implementing the provisions of this Article the Commission is authorized and directed to:
- Inspect or cause to be inspected the sites of land-disturbing activities to determine whether applicable laws, regulations or erosion and sedimentation control plans are being complied with;
- Make requests, or delegate to the Secretary authority to make requests, of the Attorney General or solicitors for prosecutions of violations of this Article.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 9; 2002-165, s. 2.7.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-59. Educational activities.
The Commission in conjunction with the soil and water conservation districts, the North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, and other appropriate State and federal agencies shall conduct educational programs in erosion and sedimentation control, such programs to be directed towards State and local governmental officials, persons engaged in land-disturbing activities, and interested citizen groups.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 10.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-60. Local erosion and sedimentation control programs.
-
A local government may submit to the Commission for its approval an erosion and sedimentation control program for its jurisdiction and may adopt ordinances and regulations necessary to establish and enforce erosion and sedimentation control programs. An ordinance adopted by a local government may establish a fee for the review of an erosion and sedimentation control plan and related activities. The fee shall be calculated on the basis of either the number of acres disturbed or in the case of a single-family lot in a residential development or common plan of development that is less than one acre set at no more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per lot developed. Local governments are authorized to create or designate agencies or subdivisions of local government to administer and enforce the programs. Except as otherwise provided in this Article, an ordinance adopted by a local government shall at least meet and may exceed the minimum requirements of this Article and the rules adopted pursuant to this Article.
(a1) Two or more units of local government are authorized to establish a joint program and to enter into any agreements that are necessary for the proper administration and enforcement of the program. The resolutions establishing any joint program must be duly recorded in the minutes of the governing body of each unit of local government participating in the program, and a certified copy of each resolution must be filed with the Commission.
-
The Commission shall review each program submitted and within 90 days of receipt thereof shall notify the local government submitting the program that it has been approved, approved with modifications, or disapproved. The Commission shall only approve a program upon determining that its standards equal or exceed those of this Article and rules adopted pursuant to this Article.
(b1) When a development project contains an approved erosion control plan for the entire development, a separate erosion control plan shall not be required by the local government for development of individual residential lots within that development that disturb less than one acre if the developer and the builder are the same financially responsible person. For review of an erosion control plan for a single-family lot in a common plan of development under this subsection where the developer and builder are different, the local government may require no more than the following information:
- Name, address, telephone number, and email of owner of lot being developed.
- Street address of lot being developed.
- Subdivision name.
- Lot number.
- Tax parcel number of lot being developed.
- Total acreage of lot being developed.
- Total acreage disturbed.
- Anticipated start and completion date.
- Person financially responsible.
- Signature of person financially responsible.
- Existing platted survey of the lot.
-
A sketch plan showing erosion control measures for the lot being developed, but the sketch shall not be required to be under the seal of a licensed engineer, landscape architect, or registered land surveyor unless there is a design feature requiring such under federal or State law or regulation.
(b2) Except as may be required by federal law, rule, or regulation, a local erosion control program under this Article shall provide for all of the following:
(1) That no periodic self-inspections or rain gauge installation is required on individual residential lots where less than one acre is being disturbed on each lot.
(2) For a land-disturbing activity on more than one residential lot where the total land disturbed exceeds one acre, the person conducting the land-disturbing activity may submit for approval a single erosion control plan for all of the disturbed lots or may submit for review and approval under subsection (b1) of this section the erosion control measures for each individual lot.
(b3) No development regulation under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes or any erosion and sedimentation control plan under a local program shall require any of the following:
(1) A silt fence or other erosion control measure to be placed in a location where, due to the contour and topography of the development site, that erosion control measure would not substantially and materially retain the sediment generated by the land-disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during construction upon and development of the tract.
(2) A wire-backed reinforced silt fence where, due to the contour and topography of the development site, that fence would not substantially and materially retain the sediment generated by the land-disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during construction upon and development of the tract.
- If the Commission determines that any local government is failing to administer or enforce an approved erosion and sedimentation control program, it shall notify the local government in writing and shall specify the deficiencies of administration and enforcement. If the local government has not taken corrective action within 30 days of receipt of notification from the Commission, the Commission shall assume administration and enforcement of the program until such time as the local government indicates its willingness and ability to resume administration and enforcement of the program.
- A local government may submit to the Commission for its approval a limited erosion and sedimentation control program for its jurisdiction that grants the local government the responsibility only for the assessment and collection of fees and for the inspection of land-disturbing activities within the jurisdiction of the local government. The Commission shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of all other components of the erosion and sedimentation control program and the requirements of this Article. The local government may adopt ordinances and regulations necessary to establish a limited erosion and sedimentation control program. An ordinance adopted by a local government that establishes a limited program shall conform to the minimum requirements regarding the inspection of land-disturbing activities of this Article and the rules adopted pursuant to this Article regarding the inspection of land-disturbing activities. The local government shall establish and collect a fee to be paid by each person who submits an erosion and sedimentation control plan to the local government. The amount of the fee shall be an amount equal to eighty percent (80%) of the amount established by the Commission pursuant to G.S. 113A-54.2(a) plus any amount that the local government requires to cover the cost of inspection and program administration activities by the local government. The total fee shall not exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per acre. A local government that administers a limited erosion and sedimentation control program shall pay to the Commission the portion of the fee that equals eighty percent (80%) of the fee established pursuant to G.S. 113A-54.2(a) to cover the cost to the Commission for the administration and enforcement of other components of the erosion and sedimentation control program. Fees paid to the Commission by a local government shall be deposited in the Sedimentation Account established by G.S. 113A-54.2(b). A local government that administers a limited erosion and sedimentation control program and that receives an erosion control plan and fee under this subsection shall immediately transmit the plan to the Commission for review. A local government may create or designate agencies or subdivisions of the local government to administer the limited program. Two or more units of local government may establish a joint limited program and enter into any agreements necessary for the proper administration of the limited program. The resolutions establishing any joint limited program must be duly recorded in the minutes of the governing body of each unit of local government participating in the limited program, and a certified copy of each resolution must be filed with the Commission. Subsections (b) and (c) of this section apply to the approval and oversight of limited programs.
- Notwithstanding G.S. 113A-61.1 , a local government with a limited erosion and sedimentation control program shall not issue a notice of violation if inspection indicates that the person engaged in land-disturbing activity has failed to comply with this Article, rules adopted pursuant to this Article, or an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan. The local government shall notify the Commission if any person has initiated land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required in the absence of an approved plan. If a local government with a limited program determines that a person engaged in a land-disturbing activity has failed to comply with an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan, the local government shall refer the matter to the Commission for inspection and enforcement pursuant to G.S. 113A-61.1 .
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 11; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 7; 2002-165, s. 2.8; 2006-250, s. 3; 2021-121, s. 5(c); 2021-180, s. 12.10A(b).
Local Modification.
Town of Chapel Hill: 1999-255, ss. 3, 7.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(e), made subsections (a1), (b1), (b2), and (b3), as added by Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(c), and the amendments to subsection (a) by Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(c), effective October 1, 2021, and applicable to erosion control plans submitted for review and approval on or after that date.
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2006-250, s. 3, effective September 1, 2006, inserted the second sentence in subsection (a); and added subsections (d) and (e).
Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(c), rewrote former subsection (a) as present subsections (a) and (a1); and added subsections (b1), (b2), and (b3). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
Session Laws 2021-180, s. 12.10A(b), effective November 18, 2021, substituted “one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00)” for “one hundred dollars ($100.00)” in the seventh sentence of subsection (d).
§ 113A-61. Local approval of erosion and sedimentation control plans.
- For those land-disturbing activities for which prior approval of an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required, the Commission may require that a local government that administers an erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 require the applicant to submit a copy of the erosion and sedimentation control plan to the appropriate soil and water conservation district or districts at the same time the applicant submits the erosion and sedimentation control plan to the local government for approval. The soil and water conservation district or districts shall review the plan and submit any comments and recommendations to the local government within 20 days after the soil and water conservation district received the erosion and sedimentation control plan or within any shorter period of time as may be agreed upon by the soil and water conservation district and the local government. Failure of a soil and water conservation district to submit comments and recommendations within 20 days or within agreed upon shorter period of time shall not delay final action on the proposed plan by the local government.
-
Local governments shall review each erosion and sedimentation control plan submitted to them and within 30 days of receipt thereof shall notify the person submitting the plan that it has been approved, approved with modifications, or disapproved. A local government shall only approve a plan upon determining that it complies with all applicable State and local regulations for erosion and sedimentation control.
(b1) A local government shall condition approval of a draft erosion and sedimentation control plan upon the applicant’s compliance with federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. A local government shall disapprove an erosion and sedimentation control plan if implementation of the plan would result in a violation of rules adopted by the Environmental Management Commission to protect riparian buffers along surface waters. A local government may disapprove an erosion and sedimentation control plan or disapprove a transfer of a plan under subsection (b3) of this section upon finding that an applicant or a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of the applicant:
- Is conducting or has conducted land-disturbing activity without an approved plan, or has received notice of violation of a plan previously approved by the Commission or a local government pursuant to this Article and has not complied with the notice within the time specified in the notice.
- Has failed to pay a civil penalty assessed pursuant to this Article or a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article by the time the payment is due.
- Has been convicted of a misdemeanor pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(b) or any criminal provision of a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article.
-
Has failed to substantially comply with State rules or local ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant to this Article.
(b2) In the event that an erosion and sedimentation control plan or a transfer of a plan is disapproved by a local government pursuant to subsection (b1) of this section, the local government shall so notify the Director of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources within 10 days of the disapproval. The local government shall advise the applicant or the proposed transferee and the Director in writing as to the specific reasons that the plan was disapproved. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (c) of this section, the applicant may appeal the local government’s disapproval of the plan directly to the Commission. For purposes of this subsection and subsection (b1) of this section, an applicant’s record or the proposed transferee’s record may be considered for only the two years prior to the application date.
(b3) A local government administering an erosion and sedimentation control program may transfer an erosion and sedimentation control plan approved pursuant to this section without the consent of the plan holder to a successor-owner of the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur as provided in this subsection:
(1) The local government may transfer a plan if all of the following conditions are met:
- The successor-owner of the property submits to the local government a written request for the transfer of the plan and an authorized statement of financial responsibility and ownership.
-
The local government finds all of the following:
-
The plan holder is one of the following:
- A natural person who is deceased.
- A partnership, limited liability corporation, corporation, or any other business association that has been dissolved.
- A person who has been lawfully and finally divested of title to the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- A person who has sold the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- The successor-owner holds title to the property on which the permitted activity is occurring or will occur.
- The successor-owner is the sole claimant of the right to engage in the permitted activity.
-
There will be no substantial change in the permitted activity.
(2) The plan holder shall comply with all terms and conditions of the plan until such time as the plan is transferred.
(3) The successor-owner shall comply with all terms and conditions of the plan once the plan has been transferred.
(4) Notwithstanding changes to law made after the original issuance of the plan, the local government may not impose new or different terms and conditions in the plan without the prior express consent of the successor-owner. Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the local government from requiring a revised plan pursuant to G.S. 113A-54.1(b).
-
The plan holder is one of the following:
- The disapproval or modification of any proposed erosion and sedimentation control plan by a local government shall entitle the person submitting the plan to a public hearing if the person submits written demand for a hearing within 15 days after receipt of written notice of the disapproval or modification. The hearings shall be conducted pursuant to procedures adopted by the local government. If the local government upholds the disapproval or modification of a proposed erosion and sedimentation control plan following the public hearing, the person submitting the erosion and sedimentation control plan is entitled to appeal the local government’s action disapproving or modifying the plan to the Commission. The Commission, by regulation, shall direct the Secretary to appoint such employees of the Department as may be necessary to hear appeals from the disapproval or modification of erosion and sedimentation control plans by local governments. In addition to providing for the appeal of local government decisions disapproving or modifying erosion and sedimentation control plans to designated employees of the Department, the Commission shall designate an erosion and sedimentation control plan review committee consisting of three members of the Commission. The person submitting the erosion and sedimentation control plan may appeal the decision of an employee of the Department who has heard an appeal of a local government action disapproving or modifying an erosion and sedimentation control plan to the erosion and sedimentation control plan review committee of the Commission. Judicial review of the final action of the erosion and sedimentation control plan review committee of the Commission may be had in the superior court of the county in which the local government is situated.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1989, c. 676, s. 4.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 12; 1979, c. 922, s. 1; 1989, c. 676, s. 4; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, ss. 8, 9; 1998-221, s. 1.11(b); 1999-379, s. 3; 2002-165, s. 2.9; 2012-143, s. 1(f); 2013-121, s. 4.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section. The Codifier of Rules shall make the conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), substituted “Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources” for “Division of Land Resources” in subsection (b2).
Session Laws 2013-121, s. 4, effective June 19, 2013, added “or disapprove a transfer of a plan under subsection (b3) of this section” in the last sentence of subsection (b1); in subsection (b2), added “or transfer of a plan” in the first sentence, in the second sentence “or the proposed transferee,” and in the third sentence “or a proposed transferee’s record”; and added subsection (b3).
Legal Periodicals.
For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).
§ 113A-61.1. Inspection of land-disturbing activity; notice of violation.
- The Commission, a local government that administers an erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 , or other approving authority shall provide for inspection of land-disturbing activities to ensure compliance with this Article and to determine whether the measures required in an erosion and sedimentation control plan are effective in controlling erosion and sedimentation resulting from the land-disturbing activity. Notice of this right of inspection shall be included in the certificate of approval of each erosion and sedimentation control plan. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services may inspect land-disturbing activities undertaken on forestland for the production and harvesting of timber and timber products to determine compliance with the Forest Practice Guidelines Related to Water Quality adopted pursuant to G.S. 113A-52.1 .
-
No person shall willfully resist, delay, or obstruct an authorized representative of the Commission, an authorized representative of a local government, or an employee or an agent of the Department while the representative, employee, or agent is inspecting or attempting to inspect a land-disturbing activity under this section.
(b1) No person shall willfully resist, delay, or obstruct an authorized representative, employee, or agent of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services while the representative, employee, or agent is inspecting or attempting to inspect a land-disturbing activity undertaken on forestland for the production and harvesting of timber and timber products under this section.
- If the Secretary, a local government that administers an erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 , or other approving authority determines that the person engaged in the land-disturbing activity has failed to comply with this Article, the Secretary, local government, or other approving authority shall immediately serve a notice of violation upon that person. The notice may be served by any means authorized under G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4. A notice of violation shall specify a date by which the person must comply with this Article and inform the person of the actions that need to be taken to comply with this Article. Any person who fails to comply within the time specified is subject to additional civil and criminal penalties for a continuing violation as provided in G.S. 113A-64 . If the person engaged in the land-disturbing activity has not received a previous notice of violation under this section, the Department, local government, or other approving authority shall offer assistance in developing corrective measures. Assistance may be provided by referral to a technical assistance program in the Department, referral to a cooperative extension program, or by the provision of written materials such as Department guidance documents.
- The damage or destruction of a silt fence occurring during land-disturbing activities or construction on a development project shall not be assessed a civil penalty under this Article provided that the silt fence is repaired or replaced within the compliance period noted in the inspection report or Notice of Violation.
History. 1989, c. 676, s. 5; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 10; 1999-379, s. 6; 2002-165, s. 2.10; 2015-241, s. 14.26(d); 2017-108, s. 6(c); 2021-121, s. 5(d); 2021-158, s. 10(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(d), effective September 18, 2015, and applicable to civil penalties assessed and notices of violation issued on or after that date, added the last three sentences in subsection (c).
Session Laws 2017-108, s. 6(c), effective July 12, 2017, added the last sentence in subsection (a); and added subsection (b1).
Session Laws 2021-121, s. 5(d), effective August 30, 2021, added subsection (d).
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 10(a), effective October 1, 2021, in subsection (c), deleted “shall deliver the notice of violation in person and” preceding “shall offer” and deleted the former last sentence, which read: “If the Department, local government, or other approving authority is unable to deliver the notice of violation in person within 15 days following discovery of the violation, the notice of violation may be served in the manner prescribed for service of process by G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4, and shall include information on how to obtain assistance in developing corrective measures.”
§ 113A-62. Cooperation with the United States.
The Commission is authorized to cooperate and enter into agreements with any agency of the United States government in connection with plans for erosion and sedimentation control with respect to land-disturbing activities on lands that are under the jurisdiction of such agency.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 13; 2002-165, s. 2.11.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-63. Financial and other assistance.
The Commission and local governments are authorized to receive from federal, State, and other public and private sources financial, technical, and other assistance for use in accomplishing the purposes of this Article.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 14.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-64. Penalties.
-
Civil Penalties. —
- Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Article or any ordinance, rule, or order adopted or issued pursuant to this Article by the Commission or by a local government, or who initiates or continues a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required except in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan, is subject to a civil penalty. The maximum civil penalty for a violation is five thousand dollars ($5,000). A civil penalty may be assessed from the date of the violation. Each day of a continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation. When the person has not been assessed any civil penalty under this subsection for any previous violation and that person abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation within 180 days from the date of the notice of violation, the maximum cumulative total civil penalty assessed under this subsection for all violations associated with the land-disturbing activity for which the erosion and sedimentation control plan is required is twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
- The Secretary or a local government that administers an erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 shall determine the amount of the civil penalty and shall notify the person who is assessed the civil penalty of the amount of the penalty, the reason for assessing the penalty, the option available to that person to request a remission of the civil penalty under G.S. 113A-64.2 , the date of the deadline for that person to make the remission request regarding this particular penalty, and, when that person has not been assessed any civil penalty under this section for any previous violation, the date of the deadline for that person to abate continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation in order to be subject to the maximum cumulative total civil penalty under subdivision (1) of this subsection. The notice of assessment shall be served by any means authorized under G.S. 1A-1 . A notice of assessment by the Secretary shall direct the violator to either pay the assessment or contest the assessment within 30 days by filing a petition for a contested case under Article 3 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. If a violator does not pay a civil penalty assessed by the Secretary within 30 days after it is due, the Department shall request the Attorney General to institute a civil action to recover the amount of the assessment. A notice of assessment by a local government shall direct the violator to either pay the assessment or contest the assessment within 30 days by filing a petition for hearing with the local government as directed by procedures within the local ordinances or regulations adopted to establish and enforce the erosion and sedimentation control program. If a violator does not pay a civil penalty assessed by a local government within 30 days after it is due, the local government may institute a civil action to recover the amount of the assessment. The civil action may be brought in the superior court of any county where the violation occurred or the violator’s residence or principal place of business is located. A civil action must be filed within three years of the date the assessment was due. An assessment that is not contested is due when the violator is served with a notice of assessment. An assessment that is contested is due at the conclusion of the administrative and judicial review of the assessment.
- In determining the amount of the penalty, the Secretary or a local government shall consider the degree and extent of harm caused by the violation, the cost of rectifying the damage, the amount of money the violator saved by noncompliance, whether the violation was committed willfully and the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with this Article, or any ordinance, rule, or order adopted or issued pursuant to this Article by the Commission or by a local government.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 11.
- The clear proceeds of civil penalties collected by the Department or other State agency or a local government under this subsection shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2 .
- Criminal Penalties. — Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of this Article or any ordinance, rule, regulation, or order duly adopted or issued by the Commission or a local government, or who knowingly or willfully initiates or continues a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required, except in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor that may include a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000).
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 15; 1977, c. 852; 1987, c. 246, s. 3; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 5; 1989, c. 676, s. 6; 1991, c. 412, s. 2; c. 725, s. 5; 1993, c. 539, s. 873; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 11; 1998-215, s. 52; 1999-379, s. 4; 2002-165, s. 2.12; 2013-413, s. 33; 2015-241, s. 14.26(b).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(b), provides: “Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law [August 23, 2013].” Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), had provided that: “This act becomes effective July 1, 2015.” Session Laws 2014-115, s. 17, amended Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), to replace the reference to “This act” with the words “This Part.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(a), is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(e), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(b), applicable to civil penalties assessed and notices of violation issued on or after September 18, 2015.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 33, in subdivision (a)(2), substituted “G.S. 1A-1. A notice of assessment by the Secretary” for “G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4, and,” and added the fourth sentence; in subdivision (a)(3), added “or a local government” and “or any ordinance, rule, or order adopted or issued pursuant to this Article by the Commission or by a local government”; and in subdivision (a)(5), added “or a local government,” and deleted the second sentence, which formerly read “Civil penalties collected by a local government under this subsection shall be credited to the general fund of the local government as nontax revenue.” For effective date, see editor’s note.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.26(b), effective September 18, 2015, added the last sentence of subdivision (a)(1) and rewrote the first sentence of subdivision (a)(2). For applicability, see editor’s note.
Legal Periodicals.
For note, “The Forty-Two Hundred Dollar Question: ‘May State Agencies Have Discretion in Setting Civil Penalties Under the North Carolina Constitution?’,” see 68 N.C.L. Rev. 1035 (1990).
CASE NOTES
Administrative Agencies’ Power to Assess Civil Penalties Is Constitutional. —
N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 3 does not prohibit the legislature from conferring the power on administrative agencies to assess civil penalties. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Administrative Agencies’ Power to Exercise Discretion in Determining Civil Penalties. —
N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 3 does not prohibit the legislature from conferring on administrative agencies the power to exercise discretion in determining civil penalties within an authorized range, provided that adequate guiding standards accompany that discretion. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Lack of Formally Adopted Guidelines Did Not Affect Substantial Right. —
No substantial right of petitioners would have been prejudiced by a civil penalty based upon the secretary’s application of the stated penalty factors absent formally adopted guidelines; petitioners did not have a substantial right to calculate in advance, to the penny, whether the financial benefits of violating this Article would outweigh the possible expense of civil penalties. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Defendant Entitled to Jury Trial in Civil Action under Subdivision (a)(2). —
Where the Attorney General, on behalf of the Department, filed action for the collection of civil penalties under subdivision (a)(2) of this section and for the imposition of an order enforcing compliance with this Article and an injunction under G.S. 113A-66 , the action was a civil action, not one for review of a final agency decision, and defendant, who requested a jury trial in his answer, was therefore entitled to jury trial on all factual issues. State ex rel. Lee v. Williams, 55 N.C. App. 80, 284 S.E.2d 572, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2962 (1981).
This Section Provides Sufficient Guidance for Promulgation of Penalty Factors. —
This Article in general, and this section in particular, provides sufficient guidance for department’s promulgation of penalty factors based on its experience and expertise in enforcing the Article; it is enough if general policies and standards have been articulated which are sufficient to provide direction to an administrative body possessing the expertise to adapt the legislative goals to varying circumstances. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Penalty Factors Reasonably Related to Administration and Enforcement of Article. —
Department’s assessment was not based upon the secretary’s “absolute” discretion, but instead upon numerous penalty factors which were reasonably related to the Article’s administration and enforcement and resulted in a fair and reasoned penalty assessment. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Penalty Held Not Arbitrary or Capricious. —
Where the penalty assessed by the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development (now Environment, Health, and Natural Resources) was within the statutory limits provided in this section, and the record evidenced the secretary’s reasoned weighing of the penalty factors announced in 15 N.C. Adm. Code 4C.006, which were reasonably related to the Article’s administration and enforcement, the department’s assessment of the monetary penalty was not arbitrary and capricious. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
The department’s assessment was not rendered arbitrary and capricious because it was based on penalty factors set forth in a properly adopted administrative regulation rather than in this section itself. In re Appeal from Civil Penalty Assessed for Violations of Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, 92 N.C. App. 1, 373 S.E.2d 572, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 981 (1988), writ denied, 323 N.C. 625 , 374 S.E.2d 873, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 710 (1988), rev'd, 324 N.C. 373 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 246 (1989).
Intervention Not Allowed. —
While the intervenors had a general interest in an underlying issue, whether the property owner was exempt from the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, they did not have a direct interest in the civil penalty imposed by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, which was the property or transaction at issue pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(a)(5); accordingly, the ALJ erred by granting intervention as of right. Holly Ridge Assocs., LLC v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 361 N.C. 531 , 648 S.E.2d 830, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 811 (2007).
Applicable Statute of Limitations. —
The one-year statute of limitations contained in G.S. 1-54 (2) does not apply to the assessment of a civil penalty by the Secretary of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (now the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources) pursuant to subdivision (a) because the assessment of the penalty is not an “action or proceeding” as those terms are used in G.S. 1-54 . Ocean Hill Joint Venture v. North Carolina Dep't of Environment, Health & Natural Resources, 333 N.C. 318 , 426 S.E.2d 274, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 39 (1993).
§ 113A-64.1. Restoration of areas affected by failure to comply.
The Secretary or a local government that administers a local erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 may require a person who engaged in a land-disturbing activity and failed to retain sediment generated by the activity, as required by G.S. 113A-57(3), to restore the waters and land affected by the failure so as to minimize the detrimental effects of the resulting pollution by sedimentation. This authority is in addition to any other civil or criminal penalty or injunctive relief authorized under this Article.
History. 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 12; 2002-165, s. 2.13.
Cross References.
As to filing notice of suit, including in those actions seeking injunctive relief under G.S. 113A-64.1 or G.S. 113A-65 , see G.S. 1-116 .
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Requirement of Deposit Into Body of Water. —
Defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim under the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA), because G.S. 113A-51 provided that sedimentation result from the erosion or depositing of materials into water, and it was clear that even a “land-disturbing activity” required an element of deposition into a body of water, no sediment was deposited into a body of water and the second requirement of a land-disturbing activity under the SPCA was that it may cause or contribute to sedimentation. Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 219 N.C. App. 462, 725 S.E.2d 360, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 400 (2012), modified, aff'd, 366 N.C. 518 , 742 S.E.2d 776, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 496 (2013).
Necessary Party Found. —
Although under G.S. 113A-64.1 , a county had independent statutory authority to require the operators of a landfill to fix any excess disturbances they might have caused, and under G.S. 113A-64.1 , the county’s suit seeking injunctive relief did not require the inclusion of any other party besides the operators, a lender that currently owned the property was a necessary party under G.S. 1A-1 , N.C. R. Civ. P. 19 as if the lender was not joined as a party, its right to determine the legal use of its property might be abrogated. Durham County v. Graham, 191 N.C. App. 600, 663 S.E.2d 467, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1505 (2008).
Necessary Party Not Found. —
City was not a necessary party under G.S. 1A-1 , N.C. R. Civ. P. 19 in a county’s suit seeking injunctive relief under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64.1, even though the operators of a landfill would have to petition the City for a zoning grant to comply with an injunction, as if the City denied such a petition, the operators could then argue before the trial court that they were unable to comply; the City had no interest in the property, although it might later become an interested party. Durham County v. Graham, 191 N.C. App. 600, 663 S.E.2d 467, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1505 (2008).
Lien holders were not necessary parties under G.S. 1A-1 , N.C. R. Civ. P. 19 in a county’s suit seeking injunctive relief under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64.1 as even during a foreclosure suit, lien holders were not necessary parties. Durham County v. Graham, 191 N.C. App. 600, 663 S.E.2d 467, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1505 (2008).
§ 113A-64.2. Remission of civil penalties.
- A request for remission of a civil penalty imposed under G.S. 113A-64 may be filed with the Commission within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. A remission request must be accompanied by a waiver of the right to a contested case hearing pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes and a stipulation of the facts on which the assessment was based.
-
The following factors shall be considered in determining whether a civil penalty remission request will be approved:
- Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 113A-64(a)(3) were wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner.
- Whether the petitioner promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation.
- Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
- Whether the petitioner had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations.
- Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for necessary remedial actions or would otherwise create a significant financial hardship.
- The assessed property tax valuation of the petitioner’s property upon which the violation occurred, excluding the value of any structures located on the property.
- The petitioner has the burden of providing information concerning the financial impact of a civil penalty on the petitioner and the burden of showing the petitioner’s financial hardship.
- The Commission may remit the entire amount of the penalty only when the petitioner has not been assessed civil penalties for previous violations and payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for necessary remedial actions.
- The Commission may not impose a penalty under this section that is in excess of the civil penalty imposed by the Department.
History. 2015-241, s. 14.26(c); 2021-158, s. 5(a).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 5(b), made subsection (a) of this section, as amended by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 5(a), effective October 1, 2021, and applicable to penalties assessed on or after that date.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 5(a), substituted “30 days” for “60 days” in subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-65. Injunctive relief.
- Violation of State Program. — Whenever the Secretary has reasonable cause to believe that any person is violating or is threatening to violate the requirements of this Article he may, either before or after the institution of any other action or proceeding authorized by this Article, institute a civil action for injunctive relief to restrain the violation or threatened violation. The action shall be brought in the superior court of the county in which the violation or threatened violation is occurring or about to occur, and shall be in the name of the State upon the relation of the Secretary.
- Violation of Local Program. — Whenever the governing body of a local government having jurisdiction has reasonable cause to believe that any person is violating or is threatening to violate any ordinance, rule, regulation, or order adopted or issued by the local government pursuant to this Article, or any term, condition or provision of an erosion and sedimentation control plan over which it has jurisdiction, may, either before or after the institution of any other action or proceeding authorized by this Article, institute a civil action in the name of the local government for injunctive relief to restrain the violation or threatened violation. The action shall be brought in the superior court of the county in which the violation is occurring or is threatened.
- Abatement, etc., of Violation. — Upon determination by a court that an alleged violation is occurring or is threatened, the court shall enter any order or judgment that is necessary to abate the violation, to ensure that restoration is performed, or to prevent the threatened violation. The institution of an action for injunctive relief under subsections (a) or (b) of this section shall not relieve any party to the proceeding from any civil or criminal penalty prescribed for violations of this Article.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 16; 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 13; 2002-165, s. 2.14.
Cross References.
As to filing notice of suit, including in those actions seeking injunctive relief under G.S. 113A-64.1 or G.S. 113A-65 , see G.S. 1-116 .
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
§ 113A-65.1. Stop-work orders.
-
The Secretary may issue a stop-work order if he finds that a land-disturbing activity is being conducted in violation of this Article or of any rule adopted or order issued pursuant to this Article, that the violation is knowing and willful, and that either:
- Off-site sedimentation has eliminated or severely degraded a use in a lake or natural watercourse or that such degradation is imminent.
- Off-site sedimentation has caused severe damage to adjacent land or that such damage is imminent.
- The land-disturbing activity is being conducted without an approved plan.
- The stop-work order shall be in writing and shall state what work is to be stopped and what measures are required to abate the violation. The order shall include a statement of the findings made by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, and shall list the conditions under which work that has been stopped by the order may be resumed. The delivery of equipment and materials which does not contribute to the violation may continue while the stop-work order is in effect. A copy of this section shall be attached to the order.
- The stop-work order shall be served by the sheriff of the county in which the land-disturbing activity is being conducted or by some other person duly authorized by law to serve process as provided by G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4, and shall be served on the person at the site of the land-disturbing activity who is in operational control of the land-disturbing activity. The sheriff or other person duly authorized by law to serve process shall post a copy of the stop-work order in a conspicuous place at the site of the land-disturbing activity. The Department shall also deliver a copy of the stop-work order to any person that the Department has reason to believe may be responsible for the violation.
- The directives of a stop-work order become effective upon service of the order. Thereafter, any person notified of the stop-work order who violates any of the directives set out in the order may be assessed a civil penalty as provided in G.S. 113A-64(a). A stop-work order issued pursuant to this section may be issued for a period not to exceed five days.
- The Secretary shall designate an employee of the Department to monitor compliance with the stop-work order. The name of the employee so designated shall be included in the stop-work order. The employee so designated, or the Secretary, shall rescind the stop-work order if all the violations for which the stop-work order are issued are corrected, no other violations have occurred, and all measures necessary to abate the violations have been taken. The Secretary shall rescind a stop-work order that is issued in error.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 11(a), effective October 1, 2021.
- As used in this section, days are computed as provided in G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 6. Except as otherwise provided, the Secretary may delegate any power or duty under this section to the Director of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources of the Department or to any person who has supervisory authority over the Director. The Director may delegate any power or duty so delegated only to a person who is designated as acting Director.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 11(a), effective October 1, 2021.
History. 1991, c. 412, s. 1; 1998-99, s. 2; 2005-386, s. 7.3; 2012-143, s. 1(f); 2021-158, s. 11(a).
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section. The Codifier of Rules shall make the conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2005-386, s. 7.3, effective January 1, 2006, inserted “business” preceding “days of the service” in the first sentence of subsection (h).
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), substituted “Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources” for “Division of Land Resources” in subsection (g).
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 11(a), effective October 1, 2021, deleted (f) and (h).
CASE NOTES
The authority to assess civil penalties under G.S. 113A-64 is still necessary to the enforcement of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (SPCA). State ex rel. Cobey v. Cook, 118 N.C. App. 70, 453 S.E.2d 553, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 74 (1995).
§ 113A-66. Civil relief.
-
Any person injured by a violation of this Article or any ordinance, rule, or order duly adopted by the Secretary or a local government, or by the initiation or continuation of a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required other than in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan, may bring a civil action against the person alleged to be in violation (including the State and any local government). The action may seek any of the following:
- Injunctive relief.
- An order enforcing the law, rule, ordinance, order, or erosion and sedimentation control plan violated.
- Damages caused by the violation.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2002-165, s. 2.15, effective October 23, 2002.If the amount of actual damages as found by the court or jury in suits brought under this subsection is five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, the plaintiff shall be awarded costs of litigation including reasonable attorneys fees and expert witness fees.
- Civil actions under this section shall be brought in the superior court of the county in which the alleged violations occurred.
- The court, in issuing any final order in any action brought pursuant to this section may award costs of litigation (including reasonable attorney and expert-witness fees) to any party, whenever it determines that such an award is appropriate. The court may, if a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction is sought, require, the filing of a bond or equivalent security, the amount of such bond or security to be determined by the court.
- Nothing in this section shall restrict any right which any person (or class of persons) may have under any statute or common law to seek injunctive or other relief.
History. 1973, c. 392, s. 17; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 6; 2002-165, s. 2.15.
Editor’s Note.
For conditional or temporary exemptions to this section, see the Editor’s notes under G.S. 113A-1 .
CASE NOTES
Violation Required for Standing. —
Before an injured person can have standing to bring a civil action pursuant to G.S. 113A-66 of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, the defendant must have been cited for a violation of a law, rule, ordinance, order, or erosion and sedimentation control plan. “Notices of Noncompliance” were insufficient to give an owner standing. Applewood Props., LLC v. New South Props., LLC, 366 N.C. 518 , 742 S.E.2d 776, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 496 (2013).
Defendant Held Entitled to Jury Trial. —
Where the Attorney General, on behalf of the Department, filed an action for the collection of civil penalties under G.S. 113A-64(a)(2) and for the imposition of an order enforcing compliance with this Article and an injunction under this section, the action was a civil action, not one for review of a final agency decision, and defendant, who requested a jury trial in his answer, was therefore entitled to jury trial on all factual issues. State ex rel. Lee v. Williams, 55 N.C. App. 80, 284 S.E.2d 572, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2962 (1981).
Downstream landowner could recover for damages caused by sediment runoff from an upstream landowner’s property into a stream and a lake where there was substantial evidence that the upstream landowner’s development was found to be out of compliance with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, G.S. 113A-50 et seq. Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C., 146 N.C. App. 449, 553 S.E.2d 431, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 970 (2001).
Punitive Damages Not Recoverable. —
The Act only provides for the recovery of “damages caused by the violation,” and because punitive damages are designed to punish a party and are not awarded as compensation, they are not recoverable under the Act. Huberth v. Holly, 120 N.C. App. 348, 462 S.E.2d 239, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 831 (1995).
Attorney Fees. —
Where a landowner sued a neighboring landowner for nuisance, trespass, and violation of the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, G.S. 113A-50 et seq., based on damages caused by the neighboring landowner’s construction activity, no apportionment of attorney fees was required. Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C., 146 N.C. App. 449, 553 S.E.2d 431, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 970 (2001).
Expert Witness Fees. —
Trial court erred in awarding expert witness fees under G.S. 113A-66(c), where there was no showing that the expert witnesses appeared under subpoena as required by G.S. 7A-314 . Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C., 146 N.C. App. 449, 553 S.E.2d 431, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 970 (2001).
§ 113A-67. Annual report.
The Department shall report to the Environmental Review Commission on the implementation of this Article on or before October 1 of each year. The Department shall include in the report an analysis of how the implementation of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 is affecting activities that contribute to the sedimentation of streams, rivers, lakes, and other waters of the State. The report shall also include a review of the effectiveness of local erosion and sedimentation control programs. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Review Commission with the report required by G.S. 143-214.7(e) as a single report.
History. 2004-195, s. 2.1; 2017-10, s. 4.15(a).
§§ 113A-68, 113A-69.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 4A. Vehicular Surface Areas. [Repealed]
§§ 113A-70, 113A-71. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2013-413, s. 54. For effective date of repeal, see editor’s note.
History. 2008-198, s. 8(b); repealed by 2013-413, s. 54.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2008-198, s. 8(b), enacted this Article as G.S. 113A-71 and 113A-72. It was renumbered as G.S. 113A-70 and 113A-71 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Session Laws 2008-198, s. 12, makes this Article effective April 1, 2009 and applicable to building permits issued pursuant to G.S. 153A-357 and G.S. 160A-417 for which applications are received on or after that date.
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(b), provides: “Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes law [August 23, 2013].” Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), had provided that: “This act becomes effective July 1, 2015.” Session Laws 2014-115, s. 17, amended Session Laws 2013-413, s. 60(c), to replace the reference to “This act” with the words “This Part.”
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 61(a), is a severability clause.
Former G.S. 113A-70 pertained to definitions. Former G.S. 113A-71 pertained to vehicular surface areas.
Article 5. North Carolina Appalachian Trails System Act. [Repealed]
§ 113A-72.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.70 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-73. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.72 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-74. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.74 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-75. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.76 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-76. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.78 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015
§ 113A-77. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.80 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§§ 113A-78 through 113A-82.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 6. North Carolina Trails System. [Repealed]
§ 113A-83.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.90 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-84. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.92 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-85. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.94 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-86. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.96 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-87. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.98 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-87.1. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.100 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-88. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.102 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-89. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.104 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-90. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.106 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-91. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.108 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-92. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.110 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-92.1. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.112 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-93. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.114 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-94. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.116 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-95. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.118 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(f), effective July 1, 2015.
§§ 113A-96 through 113A-99.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 7. Coastal Area Management.
- Part 1. Organization and Goals.
- Part 2. Planning Processes.
- Part 3. Areas of Environmental Concern.
- Part 4. Permit Letting and Enforcement.
- Part 5. Coastal Reserves.
- Part 6. Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program.
Part 1. Organization and Goals.
§ 113A-100. Short title.
This Article shall be known as the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
Cross References.
For requirements necessitated by temporary implementation of federal Phase II Stormwater Management and the Stormwater Management Rule, see the notes under G.S. 143-214.7 .
Temporary Rules Regarding Exceptions to Setback.
Session Laws 2000-142, s. 3, provides that, notwithstanding G.S. 150B-21.3(a) and 26 NCAC 2C.0102(11), the Coastal Resources Commission may adopt a temporary rule to establish criteria for exceptions to the regulatory requirement, effective August 1, 2000, of a 30-foot development setback along public trust and estuarine waters to allow construction of residences on previously platted undeveloped lots of 5,000 square feet or less that are located in intensively developed areas and that would otherwise be prohibited under rules adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes. The temporary rule shall become effective upon its adoption by the Commission and shall remain in effect until a permanent rule that replaces the temporary rule becomes effective.
Session Laws 2001-418, ss. 1 to 3, authorize the Coastal Resources Commission to adopt temporary rules to establish additional exceptions to the 30-foot buffer requirement along public trust and estuarine waters in certain circumstances and to allow structural modifications to piers to prevent or minimize storm damage.
Session Laws 2004-1, s. 1, expiring when a permanent rule making the designation becomes effective, provides that: “For purposes of implementing Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes and rules adopted pursuant to that Article and notwithstanding any provision of that Article or those rules to the contrary, there are hereby designated as temporary unvegetated beach areas those oceanfront areas on Hatteras Island west of the new inlet breach in Dare County in which the vegetation line as shown on Dare County orthophotographs dated 4 February 2002 through 10 February 2002, was destroyed as a result of Hurricane Isabel on 18 September 2003, and the remnants of which were subsequently buried by the construction of an emergency berm. This designation shall continue until stable, natural vegetation is reestablished or until the area is permanently designated as an unvegetated beach area pursuant to 15A NCAC 07H.0304(4)(a).”
Session Laws 2013-138, ss. 1, 2, and 3.1 through 3.8, provide: “Section 1. For purposes of this act, the following definitions apply:
“(1) ‘Department’ means the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
“(2) ‘Corps’ means the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
“(3) ‘Shallow draft navigation channel’ means (i) a waterway connection with a maximum depth of 16 feet between the Atlantic Ocean and a bay or the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, (ii) a river entrance to the Atlantic Ocean through which tidal and other currents flow, or (iii) other interior coastal waterways. ‘Shallow draft navigation channel‘includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and its side channels, Beaufort Harbor, Bogue Inlet, Carolina Beach Inlet, the channel from Back Sound to Lookout Back, channels connected to federal navigation channels, Lockwoods Folly River, Manteo/Shallowbag Bay, including Oregon Inlet, Masonboro Inlet, New River, New Topsail Inlet, Rodanthe, Rollinson, Shallotte River, Silver Lake Harbor, and the waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor.
“Section 2. The Department shall take all of the following steps in order to ensure that the State’s shallow draft navigation channels are safe and navigable:
“(1) The Department shall utilize long-term agreements with Corps to maintain the dredging of the State’s shallow draft navigation channels to depths authorized on the date this act becomes law.
“(2) The Department shall assist local governments in their pursuit of general permit authorizations from the Corps to allow the local governments to dredge shallow draft navigation channels to depths and according to project designs authorized on the date this act becomes law.
“(3) The Department shall assist local governments in their pursuit of individual permits under the State Coastal Area Management Act permits issued by the Corps to allow the dredging of shallow draft navigation channels to depths greater than authorized on the date this act becomes law and to allow the placement of dredged materials on beaches.
“Section 3.1. There is hereby created the Oregon Inlet Land Acquisition Task Force for the purpose of determining, reviewing, and considering the State’s options for acquiring the federal government’s right, title, and interest in Oregon Inlet and the real property adjacent thereto, including submerged lands. A more particular description of the property to be acquired is provided in Section 3.8 of this act. Acquiring the property described in Section 3.8 of this act will allow the State to preserve Oregon Inlet and to develop long-term management solutions for preserving and enhancing the navigability of Oregon Inlet, which is both a critical transportation corridor and a critical source of commerce for the State’s Outer Banks. The Task Force shall have duties including the following:
“(1) Consulting with the State Property Office and agencies and departments of the federal government, including the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States National Park Service, Congressional Budget Office, and members of the North Carolina congressional delegation to establish the monetary value of Oregon Inlet and the real property adjacent thereto.
“(2) Determining whether and to what degree the federal government will sell to the State Oregon Inlet and the real property adjacent thereto or exchange the property for State-owned real property. If the federal government expresses a willingness to exchange the property for State-owned property, the Task Force shall determine the identity of the State-owned property and the monetary value of the property.
“(3) Exploring any and all options for acquiring Oregon Inlet and the real property adjacent thereto, including condemnation of the coastal lands conveyed to the federal government in a deed dated August 7, 1958, and recorded September 3, 1958, in the Dare County Registry of Deeds.
“(4) Considering any other issues deemed relevant by the Task Force that are related to the acquisition of Oregon Inlet and the real property adjacent thereto.
“Section 3.2. The Task Force shall consist of the following 13 members:
“(1) The Governor or the Governor’s designee, who shall be chair.
“(2) The Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services or the Commissioner’s designee.
“(3) The Secretary of the Department of Administration or the Secretary’s designee.
“(4) The Secretary of the Department of Commerce or the Secretary’s designee.
“(5) The Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources or the Secretary’s designee.
“(6) The Secretary of the Department of Public Safety or the Secretary’s designee.
“(7) The Secretary of the Department of Transportation or the Secretary’s designee.
“(8) The Attorney General or the Attorney General’s designee.
“(9) Two members of the Senate appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
“(10) Two members of the House of Representatives appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
“(11) The chair of the Dare County Board of Commissioners or the chair’s designee.
“Section 3.3. The terms of the members appointed under Section 3.2 of this act shall commence on July 1, 2013. A vacancy on the Task Force shall be filled by the Governor, except that a vacancy in an appointment by the General Assembly shall be filled by the original appointing authority.
“Section 3.4. The Task Force shall meet at the call of the Governor. All members of the Task Force are voting members. A majority of the members of the Task Force constitutes a quorum.
“Section 3.5. Members of the Task Force shall receive no compensation for their service, but may receive per diem, travel, and subsistence allowances in accordance with G.S. 120-3.1 , 138-5, and 138-6, as appropriate. No State funds shall be appropriated to the Task Force or to any State agency or department for the Task Force.
“Section 3.6. The Department of Commerce shall provide staff to the Task Force. All State agencies and departments shall provide assistance to the Task Force upon request.
“Section 3.7. By May 1, 2014, the Task Force shall submit a report detailing its findings and recommendations to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the General Assembly. The Task Force shall terminate upon the filing of the report required by this section.”
Session Laws 2013-138, s. 3.8, provided a list of latitude and longitude points of the federally owned property to be acquired by the State.
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(a)-(h), authorizes the initiation of negotiations by the Department of Administration with the appropriate federal authority for the acquisition of certain federally owned property for the creation of Oregon Inlet State Park. If the subject real property is acquired by the State, then, together with any other real property owned by the State within the subject area, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is authorized to add Oregon Inlet State Park to the State Parks System. The provisions of Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(a)-(h), further provides for the condemnation authority necessary to manage existing and future transportation corridors on the Outer Banks, and for the identification of federally owned property necessary to construct or manage existing and future transportation corridors on the Outer Banks.
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 14.22(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The Division of Coastal Management and the Department of Environmental Quality shall study and provide an executive summary of readily available data and existing studies on the physical and economic, storm mitigation, and public safety benefits of out-of-state coastal storm damage reduction and beach nourishment projects. Specific items benefitted by coastal storm damage reduction shall include, at a minimum, public infrastructure, public property, private property, small businesses, and tourism. The results of the study shall be reported no later than November 1, 2016, to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(b) The County Tax Office of each covered county shall work together to identify all privately and publicly owned property island-wide in the county. A covered county includes the Counties of Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Onslow, Carteret, Hyde, Dare, and Currituck. Each County Tax Office shall determine whether the mailing/ownership address on the tax record of such property is (i) in the county where such property is located, (ii) in a noncovered county in North Carolina, or (iii) outside the State of North Carolina. Each County Tax Office shall send an electronic list of the property addresses and matched mailing/ownership addresses suitable for electronic sorting no later than November 1, 2016, to the Department of Environmental Quality and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(c) The Department of Commerce shall study and provide an executive summary of readily available economic data related to the 20 coastal counties of the State for the purpose of quantifying the contribution of the coastal economy to the economy of the State as a whole, considering, at a minimum, the benefits of travel and tourism, small businesses, job creation and opportunity, and tax revenues, including property, sales, and income taxes. The Department shall report the results of the study no later than November 1, 2016, to the Department of Environmental Quality and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(d) The Department of Environmental Quality shall include the studies required by each subsection of this section as appendices to the Beach and Inlet Management Plan required by Section 14.6(b)(4) of S.L. 2015-241.”
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 3, provides:
“(a) Notwithstanding Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes and rules adopted pursuant to that Article, the Coastal Resources Commission shall not deny a development permit for the replacement of a single-family or duplex residential dwelling with a total floor area greater than 5,000 square feet based on failure to meet the ocean hazard setback required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2) if the structure meets all of the following criteria:
“(1) The structure was originally constructed prior to August 11, 2009.
“(2) The structure as replaced does not exceed the original footprint or square footage.
“(3) The structure as replaced meets the minimum setback required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2)(A).
“(4) It is impossible for the structure to be rebuilt in a location that meets the ocean hazard setback criteria required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2).
“(5) The structure is rebuilt as far landward on the lot as feasible.
“(b) No later than October 1, 2012, the Coastal Resources Commission shall adopt temporary rules consistent with the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rules adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. The temporary rules shall remain in effect until permanent rules that replace the temporary rules become effective.”
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 4, provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of creating a new Area of Environmental Concern for the lands adjacent to the mouth of the Cape Fear River. In studying this region, which shall at least encompass the Town of Caswell Beach and the Village of Bald Head Island, the Commission shall consider the unique coastal morphologies and hydrographic conditions not found elsewhere along the coast. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with the Town of Caswell Beach, the Village of Bald Head Island, and landowners within and immediately adjacent to these two municipalities to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources of this region, the Commission shall work to eliminate overlapping Areas of Environmental Concern in these areas and instead incorporate appropriate development standards into one single Area of Environmental Concern unique to this location. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before December 31, 2013.”
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 5, provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of eliminating the Inlet Hazard Area of Environmental Concern and incorporating appropriate development standards adjacent to the State’s developed inlets into the Ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources adjacent to inlets, the Commission shall consider the elimination of the inlet hazard boxes; the development of shoreline management strategies that take into account short- and long-term inlet shoreline oscillation and variation, including erosion rates and setback factors; the development of standards that account for the lateral movement of inlets and their impact on adjacent development and habitat; and consideration of how new and existing development standards, as well as existing and proposed development, are impacted by historical and ongoing beach and inlet management techniques, including dredging, beach fill, and engineered structures such as groins and jetties. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with local governments and landowners affected by the Commission’s Inlet Hazard Areas to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before January 31, 2015.”
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7(m), provides: “Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes, Article 9A of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes, or any other provision of law, neither the Governor nor the Council of State shall be required to approve any conveyance, exchange, or condemnation made pursuant to this section. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, consultation with or reporting to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations shall not be required prior to the conveyance, exchange, or condemnation, except as set forth in subsection (h) of this section.”
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-286, s. 4.19, provides: “The Department of Environment and Natural Resources [Department of Environmental Quality] shall evaluate the water quality of surface waters in the Coastal Counties and the impact of stormwater on this water quality. The Department shall study and determine the maximum allowable built-upon area for the low density state stormwater option as directly related to the length of grassed swale treatment length; therefore providing data for a property to achieve increased built-upon area above current limits by providing a longer length of grassed swale through which the stormwater must pass. If it is determined that increases in the percentage of built-upon area can be allowed in this way without detriment to the water quality, the Department shall submit recommendations to the General Assembly for the levels of increases in built-upon area that can be supported with corresponding increases in the length of grassed swale through which the stormwater shall pass. No later than April 1, 2016, the Department shall report the results of its study, including recommendations, to the Environmental Review Commission.”
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2016.’ ”
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2016-2017 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2016-2017 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 3.16, provides: “The Division of Coastal Management of the Department of Environmental Quality, in consultation with the Coastal Resources Commission, shall study the change in erosion rates directly adjacent to existing and newly constructed terminal groins to determine whether long-term erosion rates, currently in effect in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECS Within Ocean Hazard Areas), should be adjusted to reflect any mitigation of shoreline erosion resulting from the installation of the terminal groins. The Division shall report on the results of the study to the Environmental Review Commission on or before March 1, 2018.”
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 5.1, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.7(a)-(h), provides: “(a) The General Assembly finds that the maintenance of the State’s shallow draft navigation channels in a manner that keeps those channels navigable and safe and minimizes their closure or degradation is a vital public purpose and a proper governmental function and that declines in federal funding and dredging activity have significantly and adversely impacted the ability of the federal government to maintain these channels in a timely manner. The resulting deterioration in these channels damages the significant portion of the economy of the State’s coastal regions that is dependent on the use of the navigation channels by watercraft. Therefore, it is the policy of the State to support and, when necessary to meet the public purposes set forth in this subsection, to supplement federal maintenance of these navigation channels. For purposes of this section, “shallow draft navigation channel” shall have the definition set forth in G.S. 143-215.73 F(e).
“(b) Notwithstanding subsection (b) of G.S. 143-215.73 F, fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) from the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund shall be allocated to Dare County (Local Partner) to provide a forgivable loan to a private partner for the purchase of a shallow draft hopper dredge to be used under the direction of the Oregon Inlet Task Force in accordance with the work plan negotiated under subdivision (2) of subsection (e) of this section for maintenance of shallow draft navigation channels located throughout the State. For purposes of this section, Oregon Inlet Task Force refers to the advisory body initially appointed by the Dare County Commission at its January 22, 2013, meeting, as subsequently revised by the Commission. The Local Partner shall delegate by resolution any of its delegable duties under this section to the Task Force. The Task Force shall coordinate the use of the dredge funded by this section to ensure that dredging projects for all shallow draft navigation channels located in waters of the State are completed in an expeditious and timely manner.
“(c) The selection of a private partner shall be subject only to the requirements set forth in this subsection and shall be exempt from Articles 3 and 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes. By August 1, 2018, the Local Partner shall issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) with required guidelines and eligibility criteria to private entities for the forgivable loan funded by this section. An eligible entity responding to the RFP shall submit to the Local Partner an application within 30 days in the manner and accompanied by such information as the Local Partner may require. The Local Partner shall select a private partner no later than 60 days after the deadline for submission of responses to the RFP.
“(d) The forgivable loan agreement between the Local Partner and the private entity receiving the loan (the Loan Parties) shall (i) be for a term of 10 years, renewable for additional 5 year terms at the agreement of the Loan Parties, and (ii) include, at a minimum, the following:
“(1) The dredge for which funding is provided under this section shall be used primarily for maintenance of shallow draft navigation channels located in the State under the direction of the Task Force and based on the work plan as determined in the Memorandum of Agreement described in subdivision (e)(2) of this section.
“(2) To ensure that public funds are used only to carry out public purposes, the private entity shall provide, as service repayment on the forgivable loan, dredging of the State’s shallow draft navigation channels at a cost-savings between the usual and customary rate for dredging services of this type (as determined by the Local Partner in consultation with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Quality) and a lower rate specified for the dredging in the loan agreement. The agreement shall account for cost-savings that total fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) over the term of the agreement. The Local Partner shall annually forgive that portion of the loan and any interest accrued on the loan based on the provision of reduced cost dredging services.
“(3) At the option of the Loan Parties, the agreement may provide for use of the dredge to undertake supplemental dredging projects within the State at the usual and customary rate charged for such projects if the Local Partner determines that the dredge has capacity to undertake additional work. The Loan Parties shall prioritize supplemental dredging projects for local governments over supplemental dredging projects for private entities. Supplemental dredging projects authorized by this subdivision shall not be credited toward repayment of the forgivable loan under subdivision (2) of this subsection.
“(4) If the private entity does not provide cost-savings on dredging services at the State’s shallow draft navigation channels in an amount equal to fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) over the term of the Agreement, the owner of the dredge shall repay the Local Partner within 90 days of the termination date of the Agreement in an amount equal to the remaining service repayment obligation plus any interest accrued on the remaining obligation. The Local Partner shall forward the funds repaid under this subdivision to the Office of State Budget and Management to be credited to the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund.
“(e) The Department of Environmental Quality, the Local Partner, and the private entity shall do all of the following:
“(1) Plan and allocate responsibilities for any permits, authorizations, or certifications necessary for operation of the dredge for the purposes described in this section. The Local Partner and the private entity shall structure ownership and operation of the dredge in a manner that allows work to be conducted to the maximum extent possible under general permits or through amendments to existing individual permits in order to minimize the expense and delay associated with permitting of dredge operations.
“(2) Upon request of the Local Partner, negotiate a Memorandum of Agreement or an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement between the Department and the United States Army Corps of Engineers to incorporate in-kind contributions through the activities of the dredge acquired under this section into existing work plans for maintenance work on shallow draft navigation channels of the State.
“(f) The Local Partner shall perform all of the administrative functions necessary to implement this section, including implementing the forgivable loan agreement, loan monitoring, establishing service repayment conditions, including necessary documentation for the determination of the cost of dredging services, enforcing the agreement, and all other functions necessary for the execution and enforcement of the agreement.
“(g) The State shall incur no liability for and nothing in this section is intended to waive any sovereign immunity the State may have at common law for any damages or loss associated with the activities authorized by this section. Furthermore, nothing in this section is intended to waive or abrogate the Local Partner’s immunity from civil liability in tort.
“(h) The Local Partner shall annually report no later than October 1 on dredging activities undertaken during the prior fiscal year to the Department of Environmental Quality, the Fiscal Research Division, and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources. The report shall also include detailed information about any default on the terms of the forgivable loan and resulting recoupment or repayment of the State’s investment during the fiscal year. The reporting requirement imposed by this subsection shall expire upon the filing of the report covering the fiscal year in which the term of the forgivable loan agreement ends.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.9(a), as amended by Session Laws 2018-138, s. 2.9, and as amended by Session Laws 2019-75, s. 3, provides: “Of the funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources, the sum of five million dollars ($5,000,000) shall be allocated in equal amounts to the Towns of North Topsail Beach, Surf City, and Topsail Beach for hurricane recovery projects in or benefitting the Towns and their adjoining coastline.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.9(b), as amended by Session Laws 2018-138, s. 2.9, and as amended by Session Laws 2019-75, s. 3, provides: “On or before October 1, 2019, the recipients of allocations under this section shall submit a report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources and the Fiscal Research Division. The report shall contain at least all of the following:
“(1) A list of participating local governments and engineering firms and other partners in projects funded under this section.
“(2) A list of projects funded, including a summary of the costs and the scope of the project.
“(3) Documentation of the impact on the resilience of beach nourishment projects.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2018.’ ”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2018-2019 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2018-2019 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.
Legal Periodicals.
For article analyzing and evaluating this Article in the light of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, see 53 N.C.L. Rev. 275 (1974).
For article, “The Coastal Area Management Act in the Courts: A Preliminary Analysis,” see 53 N.C.L. Rev. 303 (1974).
For article, “A Legislative History of the Coastal Area Management Act,” see 53 N.C.L. Rev. 345 (1974).
For comment, “Urban Planning and Land Use Regulation: The Need For Consistency,” see 14 Wake Forest L. Rev. 81 (1978).
For survey of 1978 administrative law, see 57 N.C.L. Rev. 831 (1979).
For survey of 1978 constitutional law, see 57 N.C.L. Rev. 958 (1979).
For comment, “Sunbathers Versus Property Owners: Public Access to North Carolina Beaches,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 159 (1985).
For article, “The Battle to Preserve North Carolina’s Estuarine Marshes: The 1985 Legislation, Private Claims to Estuarine Marshes, Denial of Permits to Fill, and the Public Trust,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 565 (1986).
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
For comment, “Legal Analysis of the Constitutionality of the Water Supply Watershed Protection Act of 1989 and the Hyde Bill,” see 29 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1279 (1994).
For article, “The Changing Face of the Shoreline: Public and Private Rights to the Natural and Nourished Dry Sand Beaches of North Carolina,” see 78 N.C.L. Rev. 1869 (2000).
For article, “Now Open for Development?: The Present State of Regulation of Activities in North Carolina Wetlands,” see 79 N.C.L. Rev. 1667 (2001).
For article, “North Carolina Oceanfront Property and Public Waters and Beaches: The Rights of Littoral Owners in the Twenty-First Century,” see 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1427 (2005).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
For article, “Wind Over North Carolina Waters: The State’s Preparedness to Address Offshore and Coastal Water-Based Wind Energy Projects,” see 87 N.C.L. Rev. 1819 (2009).
CASE NOTES
Right to Trial by Jury. —
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) provides for a trial by jury only where a party owning land affected by a final decision of the Coastal Resources Commission petitions the superior court alleging a taking; there is no other statutory authority in CAMA, nor in the Dredge and Fill Act, granting a right to trial by jury. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Simpson, 325 N.C. 514 , 385 S.E.2d 329, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 541 (1989).
Trial court erred in granting defendant’s demand for a jury trial in state-initiated proceeding seeking mandatory injunctive relief under this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) and the Dredge and Fill Act for the removal of fill material on defendant’s property. Since such an action neither existed at common law nor by statute at the time of the adoption of the Constitution of 1868, N.C. Const., Art. I, § 25 did not apply. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Simpson, 325 N.C. 514 , 385 S.E.2d 329, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 541 (1989).
In an action brought by the State seeking preliminary injunction to require removal of sign and compliance with Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), sign company was not entitled to trial by jury since it had not asserted a “right and remedy” existing when State Constitution was adopted and since CAMA did not provide statutory right to jury trial. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Givens, 101 N.C. App. 695, 400 S.E.2d 745, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 151 (1991).
The basic thrust of this Article is directed toward protecting areas of environmental concern by requiring permits for development in those areas. Rankin v. Coleman, 394 F. Supp. 647, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12288 (E.D.N.C.), modified, 401 F. Supp. 664, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15911 (E.D.N.C. 1975).
The coastal counties constitute a valid legislative class for the purpose of addressing the special and urgent environmental problems found in the coastal zone. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974, is a general law which the General Assembly had power to enact. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974, properly delegates authority to the Coastal Resources Commission to develop, adopt and amend State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The authority delegated to the Coastal Resources Commission is accompanied by adequate guiding standards in the form of legislative declarations of goals and policies and procedural safeguards. The General Assembly properly delegated to the Commission the authority to prepare and adopt State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Balancing of Costs and Benefits Not Appropriate. —
In enacting the Coastal Area Management Act, the General Assembly has established its priorities through a comprehensive regulatory scheme, completely prohibiting, e.g., construction of bulkheads and other stabilization structures in wetlands, or the filling of wetlands therein; in that context, it is inappropriate, under the statute and the rules promulgated pursuant to it, for the courts to attempt to balance the private costs of restoration against the benefits of the coastal wetlands environment. State ex rel. Cobey v. Simpson, 333 N.C. 81 , 423 S.E.2d 759, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 666 (1992).
§ 113A-101. Cooperative State-local program.
This Article establishes a cooperative program of coastal area management between local and State governments. Local government shall have the initiative for planning. State government shall establish areas of environmental concern. With regard to planning, State government shall act primarily in a supportive standard-setting and review capacity, except where local governments do not elect to exercise their initiative. Enforcement shall be a concurrent State-local responsibility.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
§ 113A-102. Legislative findings and goals.
- Findings. — It is hereby determined and declared as a matter of legislative finding that among North Carolina’s most valuable resources are its coastal lands and waters. The coastal area, and in particular the estuaries, are among the most biologically productive regions of this State and of the nation. Coastal and estuarine waters and marshlands provide almost ninety percent (90%) of the most productive sport fisheries on the east coast of the United States. North Carolina’s coastal area has an extremely high recreational and esthetic value which should be preserved and enhanced.In recent years the coastal area has been subjected to increasing pressures which are the result of the often-conflicting needs of a society expanding in industrial development, in population, and in the recreational aspirations of its citizens. Unless these pressures are controlled by coordinated management, the very features of the coast which make it economically, esthetically, and ecologically rich will be destroyed. The General Assembly therefore finds that an immediate and pressing need exists to establish a comprehensive plan for the protection, preservation, orderly development, and management of the coastal area of North Carolina.In the implementation of the coastal area management plan, the public’s opportunity to enjoy the physical, esthetic, cultural, and recreational qualities of the natural shorelines of the State shall be preserved to the greatest extent feasible; water resources shall be managed in order to preserve and enhance water quality and to provide optimum utilization of water resources; land resources shall be managed in order to guide growth and development and to minimize damage to the natural environment; and private property rights shall be preserved in accord with the Constitution of this State and of the United States.
-
Goals. — The goals of the coastal area management system to be created pursuant to this Article are as follows:
- To provide a management system capable of preserving and managing the natural ecological conditions of the estuarine system, the barrier dune system, and the beaches, so as to safeguard and perpetuate their natural productivity and their biological, economic and esthetic values;
- To insure that the development or preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal area proceeds in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations;
- To insure the orderly and balanced use and preservation of our coastal resources on behalf of the people of North Carolina and the nation;
-
To establish policies, guidelines and standards for:
- Protection, preservation, and conservation of natural resources including but not limited to water use, scenic vistas, and fish and wildlife; and management of transitional or intensely developed areas and areas especially suited to intensive use or development, as well as areas of significant natural value;
- The economic development of the coastal area, including but not limited to construction, location and design of industries, port facilities, commercial establishments and other developments;
- Recreation and tourist facilities and parklands;
- Transportation and circulation patterns for the coastal area including major thoroughfares, transportation routes, navigation channels and harbors, and other public utilities and facilities;
- Preservation and enhancement of the historic, cultural, and scientific aspects of the coastal area;
- Protection of present common-law and statutory public rights in the lands and waters of the coastal area;
- Any other purposes deemed necessary or appropriate to effectuate the policy of this Article.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
CASE NOTES
Commission Has Been Given Adequate Guidelines. —
The goals, policies and criteria outlined in this section and G.S. 113A-113 provide the members of the Coastal Resources Commission with an adequate notion of the legislative parameters within which they are to operate in the exercise of their delegated powers. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The declarations of legislative findings and goals articulated in this section and the criteria for designating areas of environmental concern in G.S. 113A-113 are as specific as the circumstances permit. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Scope of Regulation. —
The Coastal Area Management Act does not merely regulate significant development, but all development in North Carolina’s coastal wetlands. State ex rel. Cobey v. Simpson, 333 N.C. 81 , 423 S.E.2d 759, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 666 (1992).
Revised zoning ordinance which prohibited further development of wet and dry boat storage at marinas was within the police power of the State and consistent with this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act. Issuance of Cama Minor Dev. Permit No. 82-0010 v. Town of Bath, 82 N.C. App. 32, 345 S.E.2d 699, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2407 (1986).
Substantial Private Property Interest Outweighed Competing Public Interests. —
Trial court did not err in reversing the decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission to deny a request for a variance by the manager of a homeowners’ association because the manager’s substantial private property interest outweighed the competing public interests; if sandbags were removed, the manager’s condos faced potential destruction from erosion, and the manager proposed a new beach renourishment solution, and if the solution was successful, it would not need the sandbags. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Commission’s Decision Consistent with Goals of the Act. —
Trial court did not err in affirming the decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission and in applying a 60-foot setback because the plain meaning of the setback rules was that the setback criteria was based on the size of the individual building or structure involved; the Commission’s decision to base the required setback for a development on the size of each building or structure is consistent with the goals of the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974. Busik v. N.C. Coastal Res. Comm'n, 230 N.C. App. 148, 753 S.E.2d 326, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 1149 (2013).
§ 113A-103. Definitions.
As used in this Article:
- “Advisory Council” means the Coastal Resources Advisory Council created by G.S. 113A-105 . (1a) “Boat” means a vessel or watercraft of any type or size specifically designed to be self-propelled, whether by engine, sail, oar, or paddle or other means, which is used to travel from place to place by water.
- “Coastal area” means the counties that (in whole or in part) are adjacent to, adjoining, intersected by or bounded by the Atlantic Ocean (extending offshore to the limits of State jurisdiction, as may be identified by rule of the Commission for purposes of this Article, but in no event less than three geographical miles offshore) or any coastal sound. The Governor, in accordance with the standards set forth in this subdivision and in subdivision (3) of this section, shall designate the counties that constitute the “coastal area,” as defined by this section, and his designation shall be final and conclusive. On or before May 1, 1974, the Governor shall file copies of a list of said coastal-area counties with the chairmen of the boards of commissioners of each county in the coastal area, with the mayors of each incorporated city within the coastal area (as so defined) having a population of 2,000 or more and of each incorporated city having a population of less than 2,000 whose corporate boundaries are contiguous with the Atlantic Ocean, and with the Secretary of State. By way of illustration, the counties designated as coastal-area counties under this subdivision as of July 1, 2012, are Beaufort, Bertie, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Hertford, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and Washington. The coastal-area counties and cities shall transmit nominations to the Governor of members of the Coastal Resources Commission as provided in G.S. 113A-104(d) .
-
“Coastal sound” means Albemarle, Bogue, Core, Croatan, Currituck, Pamlico and Roanoke Sounds. For purposes of this Article, the inland limits of a sound on a tributary river shall be defined as the limits of seawater encroachment on said tributary river under normal conditions. “Normal conditions” shall be understood to include regularly occurring conditions of low stream flow and high tide, but shall not include unusual conditions such as those associated with hurricane and other storm tides. Unless otherwise determined by the Commission, the limits of seawater encroachment shall be considered to be the confluence of a sound’s tributary river with the river or creek entering it nearest to the farthest inland movement of oceanic salt water under normal conditions. For purposes of this Article, the aforementioned points of confluence with tributary rivers shall include the following:
- On the Chowan River, its confluence with the Meherrin River;
- On the Roanoke River, its confluence with the northeast branch of the Cashie River;
- On the Tar River, its confluence with Tranters Creek;
- On the Neuse River, its confluence with Swift Creek;
- On the Trent River, its confluence with Ready Branch.Provided, however, that no county shall be considered to be within the coastal area which: (i) is adjacent to, adjoining or bounded by any of the above points of confluence and lies entirely west of said point of confluence; or (ii) is not bounded by the Atlantic Ocean and lies entirely west of the westernmost of the above points of confluence.
- “Commission” means the Coastal Resources Commission created by G.S. 113A-104 . (4a) “Department” means the Department of Environmental Quality.
-
- “Development” means any activity in a duly designated area of environmental concern (except as provided in paragraph b of this subdivision) involving, requiring, or consisting of the construction or enlargement of a structure; excavation; dredging; filling; dumping; removal of clay, silt, sand, gravel or minerals; bulkheading, driving of pilings; clearing or alteration of land as an adjunct of construction; alteration or removal of sand dunes; alteration of the shore, bank, or bottom of the Atlantic Ocean or any sound, bay, river, creek, stream, lake, or canal; or placement of a floating structure in an area of environmental concern identified in G.S. 113A-113(b)(2) or (b)(5).
-
The following activities including the normal and incidental operations associated therewith shall not be deemed to be development under this section:
- Work by a highway or road agency for the maintenance of an existing road, if the work is carried out on land within the boundaries of the existing right-of-way, or for emergency repairs and safety enhancements of an existing road as described in an executive order issued under G.S. 166A-19.30(a)(5).
- Work by any railroad company or by any utility and other persons engaged in the distribution and transmission of petroleum products, water, telephone or telegraph messages, or electricity for the purpose of inspecting, repairing, maintaining, or upgrading any existing substations, sewers, mains, pipes, cables, utility tunnels, lines, towers, poles, tracks, and the like on any of its existing railroad or utility property or rights-of-way, or the extension of any of the above distribution-related facilities to serve development approved pursuant to G.S. 113A-121 or 113A-122;
- Work by any utility and other persons for the purpose of construction of facilities for the development, generation, and transmission of energy to the extent that such activities are regulated by other law or by present or future rules of the State Utilities Commission regulating the siting of such facilities (including environmental aspects of such siting), and work on facilities used directly in connection with the above facilities;
- The use of any land for the purposes of planting, growing, or harvesting plants, crops, trees, or other agricultural or forestry products, including normal private road construction, raising livestock or poultry, or for other agricultural purposes except where excavation or filling affecting estuarine waters (as defined in G.S. 113-229 ) or navigable waters is involved;
- Maintenance or repairs (excluding replacement) necessary to repair damage to structures caused by the elements or to prevent damage to imminently threatened structures by the creation of protective sand dunes.
- The construction of any accessory building customarily incident to an existing structure if the work does not involve filling, excavation, or the alteration of any sand dune or beach;
- Completion of any development, not otherwise in violation of law, for which a valid building or zoning permit was issued prior to ratification of this Article and which development was initiated prior to the ratification of this Article;
- Completion of installation of any utilities or roads or related facilities not otherwise in violation of law, within a subdivision that was duly approved and recorded prior to the ratification of this Article and which installation was initiated prior to the ratification of this Article;
- Construction or installation of any development, not otherwise in violation of law, for which an application for a building or zoning permit was pending prior to the ratification of this Article and for which a loan commitment (evidenced by a notarized document signed by both parties) had been made prior to the ratification of this Article; provided, said building or zoning application is granted by July 1, 1974;
- It is the intention of the General Assembly that if the provisions of any of the foregoing subparagraphs 1 to 10 of this paragraph are held invalid as a grant of an exclusive or separate emolument or privilege or as a denial of the equal protection of the laws, within the meaning of Article I, Secs. 19 and 32 of the North Carolina Constitution, the remainder of this Article shall be given effect without the invalid provision or provisions.
-
The Commission shall define by rule (and may revise from time to time) certain classes of minor maintenance and improvements which shall be exempted from the permit requirements of this Article, in addition to the exclusions set forth in paragraph b of this subdivision. In developing such rules the Commission shall consider, with regard to the class or classes of units to be exempted:
- The size of the improved or scope of the maintenance work;
- The location of the improvement or work in proximity to dunes, waters, marshlands, areas of high seismic activity, areas of unstable soils or geologic formations, and areas enumerated in G.S. 113A-113(b)(3); and
- Whether or not dredging or filling is involved in the maintenance or improvement. (5a) “Floating structure” means any structure, not a boat, supported by a means of floatation, designed to be used without a permanent foundation, which is used or intended for human habitation or commerce. A structure shall be considered a floating structure when it is inhabited or used for commercial purposes for more than thirty days in any one location. A boat may be considered a floating structure when its means of propulsion has been removed or rendered inoperative.
-
“Key facilities” include the site location and the location of major improvement and major access features of key facilities, and mean:
-
Public facilities, as determined by the Commission, on nonfederal lands which tend to induce development and urbanization of more than local impact, including but not limited to:
- Any major airport designed to serve as a terminal for regularly scheduled air passenger service or one of State concern;
- Major interchanges between the interstate highway system and frontage-access streets or highways; major interchanges between other limited-access highways and frontage-access streets or highways;
- Major frontage-access streets and highways, both of State concern; and
- Major recreational lands and facilities;
- Major facilities on nonfederal lands for the development, generation, and transmission of energy.
-
Public facilities, as determined by the Commission, on nonfederal lands which tend to induce development and urbanization of more than local impact, including but not limited to:
- “Lead regional organizations” means the regional planning agencies created by and representative of the local governments of a multi-county region, and designated as lead regional organizations by the Governor.
- “Local government” means the governing body of any county or city which contains within its boundaries any lands or waters subject to this Article.
- “Person” means any individual, citizen, partnership, corporation, association, organization, business trust, estate, trust, public or municipal corporation, or agency of the State or local government unit, or any other legal entity however designated.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 133.
- “Secretary” means the Secretary of Environmental Quality, except where otherwise specified in this Article.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 913, s. 1; c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, s. 133; 1989, c. 727, s. 126; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 839, ss. 1, 4; 1995, c. 509, s. 58; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2012-202, s. 1; 2014-100, s. 14.7(l); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), (v).
Cross References.
As to the Coastal Reserve Program, see G.S. 113A-129.2 .
Editor’s Note.
Subdivisions (1a) and (5a) were so designated at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, the subdivisions in the act having been designated (12) and (13), respectively.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 1, effective August 3, 2012, in subdivision (2), added the next to the last sentence, and in the last sentence deleted “said” preceding “coastal-area” and “thereafter” preceding “transmit”.
Session Laws 2014-100, s. 14.7( l ), effective July 1, 2014, added “, or for emergency repairs and safety enhancements of an existing road as described in an executive order issued under G.S. 166A-19.30(a)(5)” at the end of subdivision (5)b.1.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u) and (v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (4a) and substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (11).
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Wind Over North Carolina Waters: The State’s Preparedness to Address Offshore and Coastal Water-Based Wind Energy Projects,” see 87 N.C.L. Rev. 1819 (2009).
CASE NOTES
“Coastal Area.” —
The boundaries of the coastal area could not be formulated with mathematical exactness. The criterion ultimately chosen by the General Assembly to distinguish the salty coastal sounds from the fresh water coastal rivers which fed into the sounds was “the limit of seawater encroachment” on a given coastal river under normal conditions. The western boundary of the coastal zone as determined by use of the seawater encroachment criterion is reasonably related to the purpose of this Article. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The definition in subdivision (2) accurately reflects the unique geography of the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The coastal counties constitute a valid legislative class for the purpose of addressing the special and urgent environmental problems found in the coastal zone. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Inland Limits of Coastal Sounds Are Western Boundary of Coastal Zone. —
The inland limits of the coastal sounds in effect constitute the western boundaries of the coastal zone for purposes of this Article. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Jones and Pitt Counties Excluded. —
Two counties, Jones and Pitt, were excluded from this Article as the result of the General Assembly excluding from the coverage of this Article all counties which adjoined a point of confluence and lay entirely west of said point. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The slight extent of seawater encroachment into Jones and Pitt counties was of no significance to an accurate and reasonable definition of the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The purpose of the exception of former subparagraph (5)b7 was to exempt projects that were already underway and were so far along in their development that to require a permit under this Article would be unfair and possibly a denial of constitutionally protected vested private property rights. Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural Resources & Community Dev., 80 N.C. App. 201, 341 S.E.2d 108, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2146 (1986).
Applicability of former Subparagraph (5)b7. —
The exception in former subparagraph (5)b7 did not apply to replacement of decking merely because original marina and pilings were built before the ratification of this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act, as petitioner had to obtain a new building permit from the Town of Bath prior to building this decking, which permit was issued after the ratification of CAMA. Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural Resources & Community Dev., 80 N.C. App. 201, 341 S.E.2d 108, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2146 (1986).
§ 113A-104. Coastal Resources Commission.
- Established. — The General Assembly hereby establishes within the Department of Environmental Quality a commission to be designated the Coastal Resources Commission.
-
Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(a), effective July 1, 2013.
(b1)
Composition. —
The Coastal Resources Commission shall consist of 13 members as follows:
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be a coastal property owner or experienced in land development.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be a coastal property owner or experienced in land development.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in engineering in the coastal area or a marine-related science.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in engineering in the coastal area or a marine-related science.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in coastal-related business.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in local government within the coastal area.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in coastal agriculture.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in commercial fishing.
- One appointed by the Governor who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in coastal forestry.
- One appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Speaker of the House of Representatives in accordance with G.S. 120-121 who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in sports fishing.
- One appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Speaker of the House of Representatives in accordance with G.S. 120-121 who shall serve at large.
- One appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate in accordance with G.S. 120-121 who shall at the time of appointment be actively connected with or have experience in wildlife.
- One appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate in accordance with G.S. 120-121 who shall serve at large.
-
Appointment of Members. — As used in this section, the term “appointing authority” means the Governor in the case of members appointed by the Governor and means the General Assembly in the case of members appointed by the General Assembly. Appointments to the Commission shall be made to provide knowledge and experience in a diverse range of coastal interests. The members of the Commission shall serve and act on the Commission solely for the best interests of the public and public trust, and shall bring their particular knowledge and experience to the Commission for that end alone. Counties and cities in the coastal area may designate and transmit to the appointing authorities no later than May 1 of each even-numbered year qualified persons in the categories set out in subsection (b1) of this section corresponding to the Commission positions to be filled that year.
(c1) The members of the Commission whose qualifications are described in subdivisions (3), (6), (7), (8), (9), (11), and (12) of subsection (b1) of this section shall be persons who do not derive any significant portion of their income from land development, construction, real estate sales, or lobbying and do not otherwise serve as agents for development-related business activities.
(c2) All members of the Commission are covered persons for the purposes of Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, the State Government Ethics Act. As covered persons, members of the Commission shall comply with the applicable requirements of the State Government Ethics Act, including mandatory training, the public disclosure of economic interests, and ethical standards for covered persons. Members of the Commission shall comply with the provisions of the State Government Ethics Act to avoid conflicts of interest. The Governor may require additional disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by the members described in subsection (c1) of this section. The Governor may promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons described in subsection (c1) of this section.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(a), effective July 1, 2013.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(a), effective July 1, 2013.
- Office May Be Held Concurrently with Others. — Membership on the Coastal Resources Commission is hereby declared to be an office that may be held concurrently with other elective or appointive offices in addition to the maximum number of offices permitted to be held by one person under G.S. 128-1.1 .
- Terms. — The members shall serve staggered terms of office of four years. At the expiration of each member’s term, the appointing authority shall reappoint or replace the member with a new member of like qualification as specified in subsection (b1) of this section.
- Vacancies. — In the event of a vacancy arising otherwise than by expiration of term, the appointing authority shall appoint a successor of like qualification as specified in subsection (b1) of this section who shall then serve the remainder of his predecessor’s term.
- Officers. — The chairman shall be designated by the Governor from among the members of the Commission to serve as chairman at the pleasure of the Governor. The vice-chairman shall be elected by and from the members of the Commission and shall serve for a term of two years or until the expiration of the vice-chairman’s regularly appointed term.
- Compensation. — The members of the Commission shall receive per diem and necessary travel and subsistence expenses in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 138-5 .
- Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(a), effective July 1, 2013.
- Attendance. — Regular attendance at Commission meetings is a duty of each member. The Commission shall develop procedures for declaring any seat on the Commission to be vacant upon failure by a member to perform this duty.
- Quorum. — A majority of the Commission shall constitute a quorum.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; c. 486, ss. 1-6; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1989, c. 505; c. 727, s. 218(64); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2013-360, s. 14.24(a); 2015-9, s. 1.3; 2015-241, s. 14.30(u); 2017-6, s. 3; 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b), 6.1.
Cross References.
See editor’s notes at G.S. 113A-100 .
Re-recodification; Technical and Conforming Changes.
Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, provides, in part: “The Revisor of Statutes shall recodify Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, Chapter 120C of the General Statutes, as well as Chapter 163 of the General Statutes, as amended by this act, into a new Chapter 163A of the General Statutes to be entitled ‘Elections and Ethics Enforcement Act,’ as enacted by Section 4 of this act. The Revisor may also recodify into the new Chapter 163A of the General Statutes other existing statutory laws relating to elections and ethics enforcement that are located elsewhere in the General Statutes as the Revisor deems appropriate.” The Revisor was further authorized to make additional technical and conforming changes to catchlines, internal citations, and other references throughout the General Statutes to effectuate this recodification. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor of Statutes substituted “Subchapter II of Chapter 163A” for “Chapter 138A” in subsection (c2).
Session Laws 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b) and 6.1, repealed Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, and authorized the Revisor of Statutes to re-recodify Chapter 163A into Chapters 163, 138A, and 120C and to revert the changes made by the Revisor pursuant to Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor of Statutes reverted the change to the reference in subsection (c2).
Session Laws 2001-418, ss. 1 to 3, authorize the Coastal Resources Commission to adopt temporary rules to establish additional exceptions to the 30-foot buffer requirement along public trust and estuarine waters in certain circumstances and to allow structural modifications to piers to prevent or minimize storm damage.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 3, provides: “(a) Notwithstanding Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes and rules adopted pursuant to that Article, the Coastal Resources Commission shall not deny a development permit for the replacement of a single-family or duplex residential dwelling with a total floor area greater than 5,000 square feet based on failure to meet the ocean hazard setback required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2) if the structure meets all of the following criteria:
“(1) The structure was originally constructed prior to August 11, 2009.
“(2) The structure as replaced does not exceed the original footprint or square footage.
“(3) The structure as replaced meets the minimum setback required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2)(A).
“(4) It is impossible for the structure to be rebuilt in a location that meets the ocean hazard setback criteria required under 15A NCAC 07H.0306(a)(2).
“(5) The structure is rebuilt as far landward on the lot as feasible.
“(b) No later than October 1, 2012, the Coastal Resources Commission shall adopt temporary rules consistent with the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rules adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section. The temporary rules shall remain in effect until permanent rules that replace the temporary rules become effective.”
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 4, provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of creating a new Area of Environmental Concern for the lands adjacent to the mouth of the Cape Fear River. In studying this region, which shall at least encompass the Town of Caswell Beach and the Village of Bald Head Island, the Commission shall consider the unique coastal morphologies and hydrographic conditions not found elsewhere along the coast. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with the Town of Caswell Beach, the Village of Bald Head Island, and landowners within and immediately adjacent to these two municipalities to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources of this region, the Commission shall work to eliminate overlapping Areas of Environmental Concern in these areas and instead incorporate appropriate development standards into one single Area of Environmental Concern unique to this location. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before December 31, 2013.”
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 5, provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of eliminating the Inlet Hazard Area of Environmental Concern and incorporating appropriate development standards adjacent to the State’s developed inlets into the Ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources adjacent to inlets, the Commission shall consider the elimination of the inlet hazard boxes; the development of shoreline management strategies that take into account short- and long-term inlet shoreline oscillation and variation, including erosion rates and setback factors; the development of standards that account for the lateral movement of inlets and their impact on adjacent development and habitat; and consideration of how new and existing development standards, as well as existing and proposed development, are impacted by historical and ongoing beach and inlet management techniques, including dredging, beach fill, and engineered structures such as groins and jetties. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with local governments and landowners affected by the Commission’s Inlet Hazard Areas to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before January 31, 2015.”
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(b), provides: “Transition of Membership of the Coastal Resources Commission. — Except as otherwise provided in this section, the terms of all members of the Coastal Resources Commission serving on January 1, 2013, shall expire July 31, 2013. A new Commission of 13 members shall be appointed in the manner provided by G.S. 113A-104(b1) , as enacted by subsection (a) of this section. Members appointed in the manner provided by G.S. 113A-104(b1) , as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, shall be appointed no later than August 1, 2013.
“(1) The member serving pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b)(1) on January 1, 2013, shall continue to serve pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b1)(8), as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, until June 30, 2014.
“(2) The member serving pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b)(2) on January 1, 2013, shall continue to serve pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b1)(10), as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, until June 30, 2014.
“(3) The member serving pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b)(11) on January 1, 2013, whose term would otherwise expire on June 30, 2014, shall continue to serve pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b1)(6), as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, until June 30, 2014.
“(4) The member serving pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b)(5) on January 1, 2013, whose term would otherwise expire on June 30, 2014, shall continue to serve pursuant to G.S. 113A-104(b1)(9), as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, until June 30, 2014.
“Members of the Commission whose qualifications are described by subdivisions (1), (3), (5), (7), (11), and (13) of G.S. 113A-104(b1) , as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, shall be appointed for an initial term expiring on June 30, 2015, and subsequent appointments shall be for four-year terms thereafter. Members of the Commission whose qualifications are described by subdivisions (2), (4), (6), (8), (9), (10), and (12) of G.S. 113A-104(b1) , as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, shall be appointed for an initial term expiring on June 30, 2014, and subsequent appointments shall be for four-year terms thereafter.”
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-9 provides in its preamble: “Whereas, the Environmental Management Commission was established by Section 19 of S.L. 1973-1262, effective July 1, 1974; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 143B-282(a), the Environmental Management Commission was established with the power and duty to promulgate rules for the protection, preservation, and enhancement of the water and air resources of the State; and
“Whereas, the membership of the Environmental Management Commission was established by Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262; and
“Whereas, subdivision (9) of subsection (a) of Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262 provided, ‘The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria for determining the eligibility of persons under this section and for this purpose, may promulgate the rules, regulations or guidelines established by any federal agency interpreting and applying equivalent provisions of law.’; and
“Whereas, Section 5 of S.L. 1979-1158 amended the provision enacted by subdivision (9) of subsection (a) of Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262 to also provide, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this section, giving due regard to the requirements of federal legislation, and for this purpose may promulgate rules, regulations or guidelines in conformance with those established by any federal agency interpreting and applying provisions of federal law.”’; and
“Whereas, the provision enacted by subdivision (9) of subsection (a) of Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262, as subsequently amended, currently provides in G.S. 143B-283(c), ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this subsection, giving due regard to the requirements of federal legislation, and for this purpose may promulgate rules, regulations or guidelines in conformance with those established by any federal agency interpreting and applying provisions of federal law.’; and
“Whereas, the Coastal Resources Commission was established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284, effective July 1, 1974; and
“Whereas, the Coastal Resources Commission was established to implement the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 113A-102(b), the goals of the Coastal Area Management Act include management of the natural coastal systems in order to protect and maintain their natural productivity and their biological, economic, and esthetic values and management of development and preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal area in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations; and
“Whereas, the membership of the Coastal Resources Commission was established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284; and
“Whereas, Section 1 of S.L. 1989-505 amended the membership provisions established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284 to provide, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this section’; and
“Whereas, the provision enacted by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284, as subsequently amended, currently provides, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by these members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this subsection’; and
“Whereas, the Coal Ash Management Commission was established by Section 3.(a) of S.L. 2014-122, effective September 20, 2014; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.202(a) [now repealed], the Coal Ash Management Commission was established in recognition of the complexity and magnitude of the issues associated with the management of coal combustion residuals and the proper closure and remediation of coal combustion residuals surface impoundments; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.213(c), the Coal Ash Management Commission must evaluate all information submitted in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act related to the proposed classifications of coal combustion residuals surface impoundments and may only approve a proposed classification if it determines that the classification was developed in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act and that the classification accurately reflects the level of risk posed by the coal combustion residuals surface impoundment; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.214(d), the Coal Ash Management Commission must approve a Closure Plan if it determines that the Closure Plan was developed in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act, that implementation of the Closure Plan according to the Closure Plan’s schedule is technologically and economically feasible, and the Closure Plan is protective of the public health, safety, and welfare; the environment; and natural resources. In addition, the Commission may consider any impact on electricity costs and reliability, but this factor may not be dispositive of the Commission’s determination; and
“Whereas, like the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission, the Coal Ash Management Commission was established to evaluate complex issues related to the risks posed by environmental contaminants and ensure that the actions taken to manage environmental contaminants are protective of the public health, safety, and welfare; the environment; and natural resources; and
“Whereas, due to the similar powers and duties shared by the Coal Ash Management Commission with the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission, the General Assembly modelled many of the provisions establishing the Coal Ash Management Commission on provisions establishing the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission; and
“Whereas, Section 5 of S.L. 1979-1158 amended the provision enacted by subdivision (9) of subsection (a) of Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262 to also provide, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this section, giving due regard to the requirements of federal legislation, and for this purpose may promulgate rules, regulations or guidelines in conformance with those established by any federal agency interpreting and applying provisions of federal law.”’; and
“Whereas, the provision enacted by subdivision (9) of subsection (a) of Section 20 of S.L. 1973-1262, as subsequently amended, currently provides in G.S. 143B-283(c), ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this subsection, giving due regard to the requirements of federal legislation, and for this purpose may promulgate rules, regulations or guidelines in conformance with those established by any federal agency interpreting and applying provisions of federal law.’; and
“Whereas, the Coastal Resources Commission was established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284, effective July 1, 1974; and
“Whereas, the Coastal Resources Commission was established to implement the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 113A-102(b), the goals of the Coastal Area Management Act include management of the natural coastal systems in order to protect and maintain their natural productivity and their biological, economic, and esthetic values and management of development and preservation of the land and water resources of the coastal area in a manner consistent with the capability of the land and water for development, use, or preservation based on ecological considerations; and
“Whereas, the membership of the Coastal Resources Commission was established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284; and
“Whereas, Section 1 of S.L. 1989-505 amended the membership provisions established by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284 to provide, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this section’; and
“Whereas, the provision enacted by Section 1 of S.L. 1973-1284, as subsequently amended, currently provides, ‘The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by these members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this subsection’; and
“Whereas, the Coal Ash Management Commission was established by Section 3.(a) of S.L. 2014-122, effective September 20, 2014; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.202(a) [now repealed], the Coal Ash Management Commission was established in recognition of the complexity and magnitude of the issues associated with the management of coal combustion residuals and the proper closure and remediation of coal combustion residuals surface impoundments; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.213(c), the Coal Ash Management Commission must evaluate all information submitted in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act related to the proposed classifications of coal combustion residuals surface impoundments and may only approve a proposed classification if it determines that the classification was developed in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act and that the classification accurately reflects the level of risk posed by the coal combustion residuals surface impoundment; and
“Whereas, as provided in G.S. 130A-309.214(d), the Coal Ash Management Commission must approve a Closure Plan if it determines that the Closure Plan was developed in accordance with the Coal Ash Management Act, that implementation of the Closure Plan according to the Closure Plan’s schedule is technologically and economically feasible, and the Closure Plan is protective of the public health, safety, and welfare; the environment; and natural resources. In addition, the Commission may consider any impact on electricity costs and reliability, but this factor may not be dispositive of the Commission’s determination; and
“Whereas, like the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission, the Coal Ash Management Commission was established to evaluate complex issues related to the risks posed by environmental contaminants and ensure that the actions taken to manage environmental contaminants are protective of the public health, safety, and welfare; the environment; and natural resources; and
“Whereas, due to the similar powers and duties shared by the Coal Ash Management Commission with the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission, the General Assembly modelled many of the provisions establishing the Coal Ash Management Commission on provisions establishing the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission; and
Whereas, the General Assembly modelled the conflict of interest and disclosure provision of the Coal Ash Management Commission found in G.S. 130A-309.202(j) [now repealed] on the long-standing and unchallenged conflict of interest and disclosure provisions of the Environmental Management Commission and the Coastal Resources Commission; and
“Whereas, although the General Assembly finds that measures to prevent conflicts of interest for public servants and to provide abundant disclosure to prevent the appearance of conflicts of interest are of the utmost public good, the General Assembly finds that implementing such measures through issuance of an Executive Order by the Governor is unnecessary and that the Governor may determine that such additional measures are not necessary given the protections provided under Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, the State Government Ethics Act; and
“Whereas, the holding of the North Carolina Supreme Court in Wallace v. Bone, 304 N.C. 591 (1982), prohibits legislators from serving on certain boards; and
“Whereas, since Wallace v. Bone, the General Assembly has periodically enacted legislation removing legislators from serving in such capacities when those instances arise; and
“Whereas, the General Assembly has determined that legislators are not eligible to serve on certain existing boards and commissions; Now, therefore,”
Session Laws 2015-286, s. 4.19, provides: “The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall evaluate the water quality of surface waters in the Coastal Counties and the impact of stormwater on this water quality. The Department shall study and determine the maximum allowable built-upon area for the low density state stormwater option as directly related to the length of grassed swale treatment length; therefore providing data for a property to achieve increased built-upon area above current limits by providing a longer length of grassed swale through which the stormwater must pass. If it is determined that increases in the percentage of built-upon area can be allowed in this way without detriment to the water quality, the Department shall submit recommendations to the General Assembly for the levels of increases in built-upon area that can be supported with corresponding increases in the length of grassed swale through which the stormwater shall pass. No later than April 1, 2016, the Department shall report the results of its study, including recommendations, to the Environmental Review Commission”.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.24(a), effective July 1, 2013, deleted subsections (b), (d), (e), and (k); added subsection (b1), (c2), and (m); in subsection (c), added the first and last sentences, and deleted the former second and third paragraphs; in subsection (c1), substituted “(3), (6), (7), (8), (9), (11), and (12) of subsection (b1) of this section” for “(1) through (5), (9), and (11)” and “subsection” for “section,” and added “these” in the second sentence; in subsection (g), substituted “appointing authority” for “Governor,” “as” for “(as,” “(b1)” for “(b),” and “section” for “section), in the manner provided by subsections (c) and (d) of this section. The initial term shall be determined by the Governor in accordance with customary practice but eight of the initial members shall be appointed for two years and seven for four years”; in subsection (h), substituted “appointing authority” for “Governor,” “as” for “(as,” “(b1)” for “(b),” and “section” for “section),” and deleted the second through fifth sentences; substituted “the vice-chairman’s” for “his” in subsection (i); and added “Attendance” in subsection ( l ).
Session Laws 2015-9, s. 1.3, effective April 27, 2015, deleted the former last two sentences in subsection (c1), which read: “The Governor shall require adequate disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by these members. The Governor, by executive order, shall promulgate criteria regarding conflicts of interest and disclosure thereof for determining the eligibility of persons under this subsection”; and added the last two sentence in subsection (2).
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (a).
§ 113A-105. Coastal Resources Advisory Council.
- Creation. — There is hereby created and established a council to be known as the Coastal Resources Advisory Council.
- Membership and Terms. — The Coastal Resources Advisory Council shall consist of not more than 20 members appointed or designated by the Coastal Resources Commission. Counties and cities in the coastal area may nominate candidates for consideration by the Commission. The terms of all Council members serving on the Council on January 1, 2013, shall expire on July 31, 2013. A new Council shall be appointed in the manner provided by this subsection with terms beginning on August 1, 2013, and expiring on June 30, 2015. Members may be reappointed at the discretion of the Commission, provided that one-half of the membership at the beginning of any two-year term are residents of counties in the coastal area.
-
Functions and Duties. — The Advisory Council shall assist the Secretary and the Secretary of Administration in an advisory capacity:
- On matters which may be submitted to it by either of them or by the Commission, including technical questions relating to the development of rules, and
- On such other matters arising under this Article as the Council considers appropriate.
- Multiple Offices. — Membership on the Coastal Resources Advisory Council is hereby declared to be an office that may be held concurrently with other elective or appointive offices (except the office of Commission member) in addition to the maximum number of offices permitted to be held by one person under G.S. 128-1.1 .
- Chairman and Vice-Chairman. — A chairman and vice-chairman shall be elected annually by the Council.
- Compensation. — The members of the Advisory Council who are not State employees shall receive per diem and necessary travel and subsistence expenses in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 138-5 .
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 249, ss. 1, 2; 1989, c. 727, s. 127; c. 751, s. 8(14a); 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 959, s. 26; 1995, c. 123, s. 4; c. 504, s. 7; 2013-360, s. 14.25.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2013-360, s. 14.25, effective July 1, 2013, in subsection (b), added “Membership and Terms” and the language following “appointed or designated,” substituted “20” for “45,” deleted “as follows” following “appointed or designated” and deleted subdivisions (b)(1) through (b)(11).
Part 2. Planning Processes.
§ 113A-106. Scope of planning processes.
Planning processes covered by this Article include the development and adoption of State guidelines for the coastal area and the development and adoption of a land-use plan for each county within the coastal area, which plans shall serve as criteria for the issuance or denial of development permits under Part 4.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
§ 113A-106.1. Adoption of Coastal Habitat Protection Plans.
The Commission shall approve Coastal Habitat Protection Plans as provided in G.S. 143B-279.8.
History. 1997-400, s. 3.3.
§ 113A-107. State guidelines for the coastal area.
- State guidelines for the coastal area shall consist of statements of objectives, policies, and standards to be followed in public and private use of land and water areas within the coastal area. Such guidelines shall be consistent with the goals of the coastal area management system as set forth in G.S. 113A-102 . They shall give particular attention to the nature of development which shall be appropriate within the various types of areas of environmental concern that may be designated by the Commission under Part 3. Land and water areas addressed in the State guidelines may include underground areas and resources, and airspace above the land and water, as well as the surface of the land and surface waters. Such guidelines shall be used in the review of applications for permits issued pursuant to this Article and for review of and comment on proposed public, private and federal agency activities that are subject to review for consistency with State guidelines for the coastal area. Such comments shall be consistent with federal laws and regulations.
- The Commission shall be responsible for the preparation, adoption, and amendment of the State guidelines. In exercising this function it shall be furnished such staff assistance as it requires by the Secretary of Environmental Quality and the Secretary of the Department of Administration, together with such incidental assistance as may be requested of any other State department or agency.
- The Commission shall mail proposed as well as adopted rules establishing guidelines for the coastal area to all cities, counties, and lead regional organizations within the area and to all State, private, federal, regional, and local agencies the Commission considers to have special expertise on the coastal area. A person who receives a proposed rule may send written comments on the proposed rule to the Commission within 30 days after receiving the proposed rule. The Commission shall consider any comments received in determining whether to adopt the proposed rule.
-
, (e) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 134.
(f) The Commission shall review its rules establishing guidelines for the coastal area at least every five years to determine whether changes in the rules are needed.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, ss. 75, 76; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, s. 134; 1989, c. 313; c. 727, s. 218(65); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(v).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2002-116, s. 1, effective September 17, 2002, provides: “Pursuant to G.S. 150B-21.3(b), the amendment to 15A NCAC 07H.0309 (Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas: Exceptions), as adopted by the Coastal Resources Commission and approved by the Rules Review Commission on 15 November 2001, by which subdivision ‘(9) swimming pools;’ would be deleted from subsection (a) of the rule is disapproved and shall not become effective. The remainder of the amendments to 15A NCAC 7H.0309, as adopted by the Coastal Resources Commission and approved by the Rules Review Commission on 15 November 2001, shall become effective on 1 August 2002.”
Session Laws 2014-120, s. 35(a)-(f), provides: “(a) The definitions set out in G.S. 113A-103 apply to this section.
“(b) 15A NCAC 07H .0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas). — Until the effective date of the revised permanent rule that the Commission is required to adopt pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act, the Commission and the Department shall implement 15A NCAC 07H .0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) as provided in Section 35(c) of this act.
“(c) Implementation. — Notwithstanding Subparagraph (3) of 15A NCAC 07H .0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas), the Commission shall not establish any new and shall repeal any existing inlet hazard area in any location with the following characteristics:
“(1) The location is the former location of an inlet, but the inlet has been closed for at least 15 years.
“(2) Due to shoreline migration, the location no longer includes the current location of the inlet.
“(3) The location includes an inlet providing access to a State Port via a channel maintained by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
“(d) Additional Rule-Making Authority. — The Commission shall adopt a rule to amend 15A NCAC 07H .0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) consistent with Section 35(c) of this act. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rule adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of Section 35(c) of this act. Rules adopted pursuant to this section are not subject to Part 3 of Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall become effective as provided in G.S. 150B-21.3(b1) as though 10 or more written objections had been received as provided by G.S. 150B-21.3(b2).
“(e) Sunset. — Section 35(c) of this act expires on the date that rules adopted pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act become effective.
“(f) Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from (i) studying any current inlet hazard area or any other area considered by the Commission for designation as an inlet hazard area, (ii) designating new inlet hazard areas, or (iii) modifying existing inlet hazard areas consistent with Section 35(c) of this act.”
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 3.16, provides: “The Division of Coastal Management of the Department of Environmental Quality, in consultation with the Coastal Resources Commission, shall study the change in erosion rates directly adjacent to existing and newly constructed terminal groins to determine whether long-term erosion rates, currently in effect in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECS Within Ocean Hazard Areas), should be adjusted to reflect any mitigation of shoreline erosion resulting from the installation of the terminal groins. The Division shall report on the results of the study to the Environmental Review Commission on or before March 1, 2018.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (b).
Legal Periodicals.
For comment, “Sunbathers Versus Property Owners: Public Access to North Carolina Beaches,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 159 (1985).
CASE NOTES
Legislative Intent — Amendment of Rules. —
Commission offered no support for its argument that recodified G.S. 113A-107 did not apply to amendment of existing guidelines; the legislature did not intend to create differing obligations to give notice in the adoption of new rules and the amendment of existing rules. Conservation Council v. Haste, 102 N.C. App. 411, 402 S.E.2d 447, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 432 (1991).
Authority Properly Delegated. —
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974, properly delegates authority to the Coastal Resources Commission to develop, adopt and amend State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The authority delegated to the Coastal Resources Commission is accompanied by adequate guiding standards in the form of legislative declarations of goals and policies and procedural safeguards. The General Assembly properly delegated to the Commission the authority to prepare and adopt State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The purpose of CAMA’s input and review provisions is to curb arbitrary and unreasoned action by the CRC. Conservation Council v. Haste, 102 N.C. App. 411, 402 S.E.2d 447, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 432 (1991).
Input and Review Provisions Guard Against Arbitrary Commission Action. —
The broad provisions in this section for input and review by groups representing all levels and types of agencies and interests provide a substantial curb against arbitrary and unreasoned action by the Coastal Resources Commission. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Commission Rules Subject to Review. —
Pursuant to former G.S. 120-30.24 et seq., all rules adopted by the Coastal Resources Commission are subject to review by a permanent committee of the Legislative Research Commission known as the Administrative Rules Committee. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Construction with Administrative Procedure Act. —
The mandatory provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, G.S. 150B-1 et seq., must be read as complementing the procedural safeguards in this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Amendments to the State guidelines by the Coastal Resources Commission are considered administrative rulemaking and are thus subject to the comprehensive additional safeguards contained in G.S. 150B-1 et seq., the Administrative Procedure Act. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Temporary Rules Must Comply with APA and CAMA. —
A temporary rule issued under former G.S. 150B-13 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) failed to comply with Coastal Area Management Act’s (CAMA’s) notice and comment provisions; the mandatory provisions of the APA complement the procedural safeguards in the CAMA; the temporary rule provisions of G.S. 150B-13 exempt agencies only from the APA notice and comment requirements; clearly, the General Assembly did not intend that the Commission use APA temporary rules to circumvent public review and comment on major projects that could affect the State’s coastal resources. Conservation Council v. Haste, 102 N.C. App. 411, 402 S.E.2d 447, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 432 (1991).
§ 113A-107.1. Sea-level policy.
- The General Assembly does not intend to mandate the development of sea-level policy or the definition of rates of sea-level change for regulatory purposes.
- No rule, policy, or planning guideline that defines a rate of sea-level change for regulatory purposes shall be adopted except as provided by this section.
- Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a county, municipality, or other local government entity from defining rates of sea-level change for regulatory purposes.
- All policies, rules, regulations, or any other product of the Commission or the Division related to rates of sea-level change shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
- The Commission shall be the only State agency authorized to define rates of sea-level change for regulatory purposes. If the Commission defines rates of sea-level change for regulatory purposes, it shall do so in conjunction with the Division of Coastal Management of the Department. The Commission and Division may collaborate with other State agencies, boards, and commissions; other public entities; and other institutions when defining rates of sea-level change.
History. 2012-202, s. 2(a).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2014-120, s. 35(a)-(f), provides: “(a) The definitions set out in G.S. 113A-103 apply to this section.
“(b) 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas). — Until the effective date of the revised permanent rule that the Commission is required to adopt pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act, the Commission and the Department shall implement 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) as provided in Section 35(c) of this act.
“(c) Implementation. — Notwithstanding Subparagraph (3) of 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas), the Commission shall not establish any new and shall repeal any existing inlet hazard area in any location with the following characteristics:
“(1) The location is the former location of an inlet, but the inlet has been closed for at least 15 years.
“(2) Due to shoreline migration, the location no longer includes the current location of the inlet.
“(3) The location includes an inlet providing access to a State Port via a channel maintained by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
“(d) Additional Rule-Making Authority. — The Commission shall adopt a rule to amend 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) consistent with Section 35(c) of this act. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rule adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of Section 35(c) of this act. Rules adopted pursuant to this section are not subject to Part 3 of Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall become effective as provided in G.S. 150B-21.3(b1) as though 10 or more written objections had been received as provided by G.S. 150B-21.3(b2).
“(e) Sunset. — Section 35(c) of this act expires on the date that rules adopted pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act become effective.
“(f) Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from (i) studying any current inlet hazard area or any other area considered by the Commission for designation as an inlet hazard area, (ii) designating new inlet hazard areas, or (iii) modifying existing inlet hazard areas consistent with Section 35(c) of this act.”
§ 113A-108. Effect of State guidelines.
All local land-use plans adopted pursuant to this Article within the coastal area shall be consistent with the State guidelines. No permit shall be issued under Part 4 of this Article which is inconsistent with the State guidelines. Any State land policies governing the acquisition, use and disposition of land by State departments and agencies shall take account of and be consistent with the State guidelines adopted under this Article, insofar as lands within the coastal area are concerned. Any State land classification system which shall be promulgated shall take account of and be consistent with the State guidelines adopted under this Article, insofar as it applies to lands within the coastal area.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
CASE NOTES
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974, properly delegates authority to the Coastal Resources Commission to develop, adopt and amend State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The authority delegated to the Coastal Resources Commission is accompanied by adequate guiding standards in the form of legislative declarations of goals and policies and procedural safeguards. The General Assembly properly delegated to the Commission the authority to prepare and adopt State guidelines for the coastal area. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Purpose of State Guidelines. —
The State guidelines are designed to facilitate State and local government compliance with the planning and permit-letting aspects of this Article. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
§ 113A-109. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2017-10, s. 3.8, effective May 4, 2017.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, ss. 1, 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; repealed by 2017-10, s. 3.8, effective May 4, 2017.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-109 pertained to the county letter of intent; timetable for preparation of land-use plan.
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 5.1, is a severability clause.
§ 113A-110. Land-use plans.
- A land-use plan for a county shall, for the purpose of this Article, consist of statements of objectives, policies, and standards to be followed in public and private use of land within the county, which shall be supplemented by maps showing the appropriate location of particular types of land or water use and their relationships to each other and to public facilities and by specific criteria for particular types of land or water use in particular areas. The plan shall give special attention to the protection and appropriate development of areas of environmental concern designated under Part 3. The plan shall be consistent with the goals of the coastal area management system as set forth in G.S. 113A-102 and with the State guidelines adopted by the Commission under G.S. 113A-107 . The plan shall be adopted, and may be amended from time to time, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section.
- The body charged with preparation and adoption of a county’s land-use plan (whether the county government or the Commission) may delegate some or all of its responsibilities to the lead regional organization for the region of which the county is a part. Any such delegation shall become effective upon the acceptance thereof by the lead regional organization. Any county proposing a delegation to the lead regional organization shall give written notice thereof to the Commission at least two weeks prior to the date on which such action is to be taken. Any city or county within the coastal area may also seek the assistance or advice of its lead regional organization in carrying out any planning activity under this Article.
- The body charged with preparation and adoption of a county’s land-use plan (whether the county or the Commission or a unit delegated such responsibility) may either (i) delegate to a city within the county responsibility for preparing those portions of the land-use plan which affect land within the city’s zoning jurisdiction or (ii) receive recommendations from the city concerning those portions of the land-use plan which affect land within the city’s zoning jurisdiction, prior to finally adopting the plan or any amendments thereto or (iii) delegate responsibility to some cities and receive recommendations from other cities in the county. The body shall give written notice to the Commission of its election among these alternatives. On written application from a city to the Commission, the Commission shall require the body to delegate plan-making authority to that city for land within the city’s zoning jurisdiction if the Commission finds that the city is currently enforcing its zoning ordinance, its subdivision regulations, and the State Building Code within such jurisdiction.
- The body charged with adoption of a land-use plan may either adopt it as a whole by a single resolution or adopt it in parts by successive resolutions; said parts may either correspond with major geographical sections or divisions of the county or with functional subdivisions of the subject matters of the plan. Amendments and extensions to the plan may be adopted in the same manner.
- Prior to adoption or subsequent amendment of any land-use plan, the body charged with its preparation and adoption (whether the county or the Commission or a unit delegated such responsibility) shall hold a public hearing at which public and private parties shall have the opportunity to present comments and recommendations. Notice of the hearing shall be given not less than 30 days before the date of the hearing and shall state the date, time, and place of the hearing; the subject of the hearing; the action which is proposed; and that copies of the proposed plan or amendment are available for public inspection at a designated office in the county courthouse during designated hours. Any such notice shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county.
- No land-use plan shall become finally effective until it has been approved by the Commission. The county or other unit adopting the plan shall transmit it, when adopted, to the Commission for review. The Commission shall afford interested persons an opportunity to present objections and comments regarding the plan, and shall review and consider each county land-use plan in light of such objections and comments, the State guidelines, the requirements of this Article, and any generally applicable standards of review adopted by rule of the Commission. Within 45 days after receipt of a county land-use plan the Commission shall either approve the plan or notify the county of the specific changes which must be made in order for it to be approved. Following such changes, the plan may be resubmitted in the same manner as the original plan.
- Copies of each county land-use plan which has been approved, and as it may have been amended from time to time, shall be maintained in a form available for public inspection by (i) the county, (ii) the Commission, and (iii) the lead regional organization of the region which includes the county.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
Legal Periodicals.
For comment on public participation in local land use planning, see 53 N.C.L. Rev. 975 (1975).
CASE NOTES
Revised zoning ordinance which prohibited further development of wet and dry boat storage at marinas was within the police power of the State and consistent with this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act. Issuance of Cama Minor Dev. Permit No. 82-0010 v. Town of Bath, 82 N.C. App. 32, 345 S.E.2d 699, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2407 (1986).
§ 113A-111. Effect of land-use plan.
No permit shall be issued under Part 4 of this Article for development which is inconsistent with the approved land-use plan for the county in which it is proposed. No local ordinance or other local regulation shall be adopted which, within an area of environmental concern, is inconsistent with the land-use plan of the county or city in which it is effective; any existing local ordinances and regulations within areas of environmental concern shall be reviewed in light of the applicable local land-use plan and modified as may be necessary to make them consistent therewith. All local ordinances and other local regulations affecting a county within the coastal area, but not affecting an area of environmental concern, shall be reviewed by the Commission for consistency with the applicable county and city land-use plans and, if the Commission finds any such ordinance or regulation to be inconsistent with the applicable land-use plan, it shall transmit recommendations for modification to the adopting local government.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.9(b), as amended by Session Laws 2018-138, s. 2.9, and as amended by Session Laws 2019-75, s. 3, provides: “On or before October 1, 2019, the recipients of allocations under this section shall submit a report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources and the Fiscal Research Division. The report shall contain at least all of the following:
“(1) A list of participating local governments and engineering firms and other partners in projects funded under this section.
“(2) A list of projects funded, including a summary of the costs and the scope of the project.
“(3) Documentation of the impact on the resilience of beach nourishment projects.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2018.’ ”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2018- 2019 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2018-2019 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.
Legal Periodicals.
For article discussing a practical interpretation of North Carolina’s comprehensive plan requirement for zoning regulations, see 7 Campbell L. Rev. 1 (1984).
CASE NOTES
Revised zoning ordinance which prohibited further development of wet and dry boat storage at marinas was within the police power of the State and consistent with this Article, the Coastal Area Management Act. Issuance of Cama Minor Dev. Permit No. 82-0010 v. Town of Bath, 82 N.C. App. 32, 345 S.E.2d 699, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2407 (1986).
§ 113A-112. Planning grants.
The Secretary is authorized to make grants to local governmental units for the purpose of assisting in the development of local plans and management programs under this Article. The Secretary shall develop and administer generally applicable criteria under which local governments may qualify for such assistance. The Secretary may condition payment of a grant on the completion of the local plan or management program and may pay the grant in installments based on satisfactory completion of specific elements of the plan or program and on approval of the plan or program by the Commission. Of the funds appropriated to the Department to make grants under this section, the Department may carry forward to the next fiscal year funds in the amount necessary to pay grants awarded or extended in any fiscal year.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(66); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2001-494, s. 6.
Part 3. Areas of Environmental Concern.
§ 113A-113. Areas of environmental concern; in general.
- The Coastal Resources Commission shall by rule designate geographic areas of the coastal area as areas of environmental concern and specify the boundaries thereof, in the manner provided in this Part.
-
The Commission may designate as areas of environmental concern any one or more of the following, singly or in combination:
- Coastal wetlands as defined in G.S. 113-229(n)(3) and contiguous areas necessary to protect those wetlands;
- Estuarine waters, that is, all the water of the Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North Carolina and all the waters of the bays, sounds, rivers, and tributaries thereto seaward of the dividing line between coastal fishing waters and inland fishing waters, as set forth in the most recent official published agreement adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Department of Environmental Quality;
-
Renewable resource areas where uncontrolled or incompatible development which results in the loss or reduction of continued long-range productivity could jeopardize future water, food or fiber requirements of more than local concern, which may include:
- Watersheds or aquifers that are present sources of public water supply, as identified by the Department or the Environmental Management Commission, or that are classified for water-supply use pursuant to G.S. 143-214.1 ;
- Capacity use areas that have been declared by the Environmental Management Commission pursuant to G.S. 143-215.13(c) and areas wherein said Environmental Management Commission (pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(d) or 143-215.3(a)(8)) has determined that a generalized condition of water depletion or water or air pollution exists;
- Prime forestry land (sites capable of producing 85 cubic feet per acre-year, or more, of marketable timber), as identified by the Department.
-
Fragile or historic areas, and other areas containing environmental or natural resources of more than local significance, where uncontrolled or incompatible development could result in major or irreversible damage to important historic, cultural, scientific or scenic values or natural systems, which may include:
- Existing national or State parks or forests, wilderness areas, the State Nature and Historic Preserve, or public recreation areas; existing sites that have been acquired for any of the same, as identified by the Secretary; and proposed sites for any of the same, as identified by the Secretary, provided that the proposed site has been formally designated for acquisition by the governmental agency having jurisdiction;
- Present sections of the natural and scenic rivers system;
- Stream segments that have been classified for scientific or research uses by the Environmental Management Commission, or that are proposed to be so classified in a proceeding that is pending before said Environmental Management Commission pursuant to G.S. 143-214.1 at the time of the designation of the area of environmental concern;
- Existing wildlife refuges, preserves or management areas, and proposed sites for the same, as identified by the Wildlife Resources Commission, provided that the proposed site has been formally designated for acquisition (as hereinafter defined) or for inclusion in a cooperative agreement by the governmental agency having jurisdiction;
- Complex natural areas surrounded by modified landscapes that do not drastically alter the landscape, such as virgin forest stands within a commercially managed forest, or bogs in an urban complex;
- Areas that sustain remnant species or aberrations in the landscape produced by natural forces, such as rare and endangered botanical or animal species;
- Areas containing unique geological formations, as identified by the State Geologist; and
- Historic places that are listed, or have been approved for listing by the North Carolina Historical Commission, in the National Register of Historic Places pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966; historical, archaeological, and other places and properties owned, managed or assisted by the State of North Carolina pursuant to Chapter 121; and properties or areas that are or may be designated by the Secretary of the Interior as registered natural landmarks or as national historic landmarks;
- Areas such as waterways and lands under or flowed by tidal waters or navigable waters, to which the public may have rights of access or public trust rights, and areas which the State of North Carolina may be authorized to preserve, conserve, or protect under Article XIV, Sec. 5 of the North Carolina Constitution;
-
Natural-hazard areas where uncontrolled or incompatible development could unreasonably endanger life or property, and other areas especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other adverse effects of sand, wind and water, which may include:
- Sand dunes along the Outer Banks;
- Ocean and estuarine beaches and the shoreline of estuarine and public trust waters;
- Floodways and floodplains;
- Areas where geologic and soil conditions are such that there is a substantial possibility of excessive erosion or seismic activity, as identified by the State Geologist;
- Areas with a significant potential for air inversions, as identified by the Environmental Management Commission.
- Areas which are or may be impacted by key facilities.
- Outstanding Resource Waters as designated by the Environmental Management Commission and such contiguous land as the Coastal Resources Commission reasonably deems necessary for the purpose of maintaining the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values identified in the designation.
- Primary Nursery Areas as designated by the Marine Fisheries Commission and such contiguous land as the Coastal Resources Commission reasonably deems necessary to protect the resource values identified in the designation including, but not limited to, those values contributing to the continued productivity of estuarine and marine fisheries and thereby promoting the public health, safety and welfare.
- In those instances where subsection (b) of this section refers to locations identified by a specified agency, said agency is hereby authorized to make the indicated identification from time to time and is directed to transmit the identification to the Commission; provided, however, that no designation of an area of environmental concern based solely on an agency identification of a proposed location may remain effective for longer than three years unless, in the case of paragraphs (4)a and d of subsection (b) of this section, the proposed site has been at least seventy-five percent (75%) acquired. Within the meaning of this section, “formal designation for acquisition” means designation in a formal resolution adopted by the governing body of the agency having jurisdiction (or by its chief executive, if it has no governing body), together with a direction in said resolution that the initial step in the land acquisition process be taken (as by filing an application with the Department of Administration to acquire property pursuant to G.S. 146-23 ).
- Additional grounds for designation of areas of environmental concern are prohibited unless enacted into law by an act of the General Assembly.
History. 1973, c. 476, s. 128; c. 1262, ss. 23, 86; c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 518, s. 1; 1989, c. 217, s. 1; c. 727, s. 128; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 4 provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of creating a new Area of Environmental Concern for the lands adjacent to the mouth of the Cape Fear River. In studying this region, which shall at least encompass the Town of Caswell Beach and the Village of Bald Head Island, the Commission shall consider the unique coastal morphologies and hydrographic conditions not found elsewhere along the coast. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with the Town of Caswell Beach, the Village of Bald Head Island, and landowners within and immediately adjacent to these two municipalities to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources of this region, the Commission shall work to eliminate overlapping Areas of Environmental Concern in these areas and instead incorporate appropriate development standards into one single Area of Environmental Concern unique to this location. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before December 31, 2013.”
Session Laws 2012-202, s. 5, provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall study the feasibility of eliminating the Inlet Hazard Area of Environmental Concern and incorporating appropriate development standards adjacent to the State’s developed inlets into the Ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern. If the Commission deems action is necessary to preserve, protect, and balance the economic and natural resources adjacent to inlets, the Commission shall consider the elimination of the inlet hazard boxes; the development of shoreline management strategies that take into account short- and long-term inlet shoreline oscillation and variation, including erosion rates and setback factors; the development of standards that account for the lateral movement of inlets and their impact on adjacent development and habitat; and consideration of how new and existing development standards, as well as existing and proposed development, are impacted by historical and ongoing beach and inlet management techniques, including dredging, beach fill, and engineered structures such as groins and jetties. As part of this study, the Commission shall collaborate with local governments and landowners affected by the Commission’s Inlet Hazard Areas to identify regulatory concerns and develop strategies for creating a more efficient regulatory framework. The Commission shall report its findings, including any proposed actions the Commission deems appropriate, to the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, the Governor, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Environmental Review Commission on or before January 31, 2015.”
Session Laws 2014-120, s. 35(a)-(f), provides: “(a) The definitions set out in G.S. 113A-103 apply to this section.
“(b) 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas). — Until the effective date of the revised permanent rule that the Commission is required to adopt pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act, the Commission and the Department shall implement 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) as provided in Section 35(c) of this act.
“(c) Implementation. — Notwithstanding Subparagraph (3) of 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas), the Commission shall not establish any new and shall repeal any existing inlet hazard area in any location with the following characteristics:
“(1) The location is the former location of an inlet, but the inlet has been closed for at least 15 years.
“(2) Due to shoreline migration, the location no longer includes the current location of the inlet.
“(3) The location includes an inlet providing access to a State Port via a channel maintained by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
“(d) Additional Rule-Making Authority. — The Commission shall adopt a rule to amend 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) consistent with Section 35(c) of this act. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rule adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of Section 35(c) of this act. Rules adopted pursuant to this section are not subject to Part 3 of Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall become effective as provided in G.S. 150B-21.3(b1) as though 10 or more written objections had been received as provided by G.S. 150B-21.3(b2).
“(e) Sunset. — Section 35(c) of this act expires on the date that rules adopted pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act become effective.
“(f) Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from (i) studying any current inlet hazard area or any other area considered by the Commission for designation as an inlet hazard area, (ii) designating new inlet hazard areas, or (iii) modifying existing inlet hazard areas consistent with Section 35(c) of this act.”
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 3.16, provides: “The Division of Coastal Management of the Department of Environmental Quality, in consultation with the Coastal Resources Commission, shall study the change in erosion rates directly adjacent to existing and newly constructed terminal groins to determine whether long-term erosion rates, currently in effect in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECS Within Ocean Hazard Areas), should be adjusted to reflect any mitigation of shoreline erosion resulting from the installation of the terminal groins. The Division shall report on the results of the study to the Environmental Review Commission on or before March 1, 2018.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (b)(2).
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “The Battle to Preserve North Carolina’s Estuarine Marshes: The 1985 Legislation, Private Claims to Estuarine Marshes, Denial of Permits to Fill, and the Public Trust,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 565 (1986).
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
For article, “North Carolina Oceanfront Property and Public Waters and Beaches: The Rights of Littoral Owners in the Twenty-First Century,” see 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1427 (2005).
CASE NOTES
Commission Has Been Given Adequate Guidelines. —
The goals, policies and criteria outlined in G.S. 113A-102 and this section provide the members of the Coastal Resources Commission with an adequate notion of the legislative parameters within which they are to operate in the exercise of their delegated powers. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
The declarations of legislative findings and goals articulated in G.S. 113A-102 and the criteria for designating areas of environmental concern in this section are as specific as the circumstances permit. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
§ 113A-114. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1983, c. 518, s. 2.
§ 113A-115. Designation of areas of environmental concern.
-
Prior to adopting any rule permanently designating any area of environmental concern the Secretary and the Commission shall hold a public hearing in each county in which lands to be affected are located, at which public and private parties shall have the opportunity to present comments and views. Hearings required by this section are in addition to the hearing required by Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. The following provisions shall apply for all such hearings:
- Notice of any such hearing shall be given not less than 30 days before the date of such hearing and shall state the date, time and place of the hearing, the subject of the hearing, and the action to be taken. The notice shall specify that a copy of the description of the area or areas of environmental concern proposed by the Secretary is available for public inspection at the county courthouse of each county affected.
- Any such notice shall be published at least once in one newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties affected at least 30 days before the date on which the public hearing is scheduled to begin.
- Any person who desires to be heard at such public hearing shall give notice thereof in writing to the Secretary on or before the first date set for the hearing. The Secretary is authorized to set reasonable time limits for the oral presentation of views by any one person at any such hearing. The Secretary shall permit anyone who so desires to file a written argument or other statement with him in relation to any proposed plan any time within 30 days following the conclusion of any public hearing or within such additional time as he may allow by notice given as prescribed in this section.
- Upon completion of the hearing and consideration of submitted evidence and arguments with respect to any proposed action pursuant to this section, the Commission shall adopt its final action with respect thereto and shall file a duly certified copy thereof with the Attorney General and with the board of commissioners of each county affected thereby.
- In addition to the notice required by G.S. 113A-115(a)(2) notice shall be given to any interested State agency and to any citizen or group that has filed a request to be notified of a public hearing to be held under this section.
- The Commission shall review the designated areas of environmental concern at least biennially. New areas may be designated and designated areas may be deleted, in accordance with the same procedures as apply to the original designations of areas under this section. Areas shall not be deleted unless it is found that the conditions upon which the original designation was based shall have been found to be substantially altered.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, s. 78; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, s. 135; 2000-189, s. 11.
CASE NOTES
There was no justiciable controversy in a declaratory judgment action on the question of whether there was an unconstitutional taking of the plaintiffs’ land as the result of the designation of their land as an interim area of environmental concern where, at the time the case was tried, the plaintiffs had no occasion to seek development permits, variances, or exemptions from coverage, and could only speculate as to the effect the act would have on the usefulness and value of their specific plots of land. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978) (decided under former G.S. 113A-114 ).
The designation of land as an interim area of environmental concern does not subject development to a permit requirement; it merely requires the developer to give the State 60 days notice before undertaking the proposed activity. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978) (decided under former G.S. 113A-114 ).
§ 113A-115.1. Limitations on erosion control structures.
-
As used in this section:
-
“Erosion control structure” means a breakwater, bulkhead, groin, jetty, revetment, seawall, or any similar structure.
(1a) “Estuarine shoreline” means all shorelines that are not ocean shorelines that border estuarine waters as defined in G.S. 113A-113(b)(2).
- “Ocean shoreline” means the Atlantic Ocean, the oceanfront beaches, and frontal dunes. The term “ocean shoreline” includes an ocean inlet and lands adjacent to an ocean inlet but does not include that portion of any inlet and lands adjacent to the inlet that exhibits characteristics of estuarine shorelines.
- “Terminal groin” means one or more structures constructed at the terminus of an island or on the side of an inlet, with a main stem generally perpendicular to the beach shoreline, that is primarily intended to protect the terminus of the island from shoreline erosion and inlet migration. A “terminal groin” shall be pre-filled with beach quality sand and allow sand moving in the littoral zone to flow past the structure. A “terminal groin” may include other design features, such as a number of smaller supporting structures, that are consistent with sound engineering practices and as recommended by a professional engineer licensed to practice pursuant to Chapter 89C of the General Statutes. A “terminal groin” is not a jetty.
-
“Erosion control structure” means a breakwater, bulkhead, groin, jetty, revetment, seawall, or any similar structure.
-
No person shall construct a permanent erosion control structure in an ocean shoreline. The Commission shall not permit the construction of a temporary erosion control structure that consists of anything other than sandbags in an ocean shoreline. This subsection shall not apply to any of the following:
- Any permanent erosion control structure that is approved pursuant to an exception set out in a rule adopted by the Commission prior to July 1, 2003.
- Any permanent erosion control structure that was originally constructed prior to July 1, 1974, and that has since been in continuous use to protect an inlet that is maintained for navigation.
-
Any terminal groin permitted pursuant to this section.
(b1) This section shall not be construed to limit the authority of the Commission to adopt rules to designate or protect areas of environmental concern, to govern the use of sandbags, or to govern the use of erosion control structures in estuarine shorelines.
-
The Commission may renew a permit for a permanent erosion control structure originally permitted pursuant to a variance granted by the Commission prior to July 1, 1995, if the Commission finds that: (i) the structure will not be enlarged beyond the dimensions set out in the original permit; (ii) there is no practical alternative to replacing the structure that will provide the same or similar benefits; and (iii) the replacement structure will comply with all applicable laws and with all rules, other than the rule or rules with respect to which the Commission granted the variance, that are in effect at the time the structure is replaced.
(c1) The Commission may authorize the repair or replacement of a temporary erosion control structure that was originally permitted prior to July 1, 1995, if the Commission finds that (i) the structure is located adjacent to an intertidal marine rock outcropping designated by the State as a Natural Heritage Area pursuant to Part 42 of Article 2 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes and (ii) the replacement structure will comply with all applicable laws and with all rules, other than the rule or rules with respect to which the Commission granted the variance, that are in effect at the time the structure is replaced.
- Any rule that prohibits permanent erosion control structures shall not apply to terminal groins permitted pursuant to this section.
-
In addition to the requirements of Part 4 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes, an applicant for a permit for the construction of a terminal groin shall submit all of the following to the Commission:
- Information to demonstrate that structures or infrastructure are threatened by erosion.
- An environmental impact statement that satisfies the requirements of G.S. 113A-4 . An environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq., for the construction of the terminal groin shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
- A list of property owners and local governments that may be affected by the construction of the proposed terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project and proof that the property owners and local governments have been notified of the application for construction of the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project.
- A plan for the construction and maintenance of the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project prepared by a professional engineer licensed to practice pursuant to Chapter 89C of the General Statutes.
-
A plan for the management of the inlet and the estuarine and ocean shorelines immediately adjacent to and under the influence of the inlet. The inlet management plan monitoring and mitigation requirements must be reasonable and not impose requirements whose costs outweigh the benefits. The inlet management plan is not required to address sea level rise. The inlet management plan shall do all of the following relative to the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project:
- Describe the post-construction activities that the applicant will undertake to monitor the impacts on coastal resources.
- Define the baseline for assessing any adverse impacts and the thresholds for when the adverse impacts must be mitigated.
- Provide for mitigation measures to be implemented if adverse impacts reach the thresholds defined in the plan.
- Provide for modification or removal of the terminal groin if the adverse impacts cannot be mitigated.
-
Proof of financial assurance verified by the Commission or the Secretary of Environmental Quality in the form of a bond, insurance policy, escrow account, guaranty, local government taxing or assessment authority, a property owner association’s approved assessment, or other financial instrument or combination of financial instruments that is adequate to cover the cost of implementing all of the following components of the inlet management plan:
- Long-term maintenance and monitoring of the terminal groin.
- Implementation of mitigation measures.
- Modification or removal of the terminal groin.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2013-384, s. 3(a), effective August 23, 2013, and applicable to permit applications submitted on or after that date.
-
The Commission shall issue a permit for the construction of a terminal groin if the Commission finds no grounds for denying the permit under
G.S. 113A-120
and the Commission finds all of the following:
- The applicant has complied with all of the requirements of subsection (e) of this section.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2013-384, s. 3(a), effective August 23, 2013, and applicable to permit applications submitted on or after that date.
- The terminal groin will be accompanied by a concurrent beach fill project to prefill the groin.
- Construction and maintenance of the terminal groin will not result in significant adverse impacts to private property or to the public recreational beach. In making this finding, the Commission shall take into account the potential benefits of the project, including protection of the terminus of the island from shoreline erosion and inlet migration, beaches, protective dunes, wildlife habitats, roads, homes, and infrastructure, and mitigation measures, including the accompanying beach fill project, that will be incorporated into the project design and construction and the inlet management plan.
- The inlet management plan is adequate for purposes of monitoring the impacts of the proposed terminal groin and mitigating any adverse impacts identified as a result of the monitoring.
- Except to the extent expressly modified by this section, the project complies with State guidelines for coastal development adopted by the Commission pursuant to G.S. 113A-107 .
- The Commission may issue no more than six permits for the construction of a terminal groin pursuant to this section, provided that two of the six permits may be issued only for the construction of terminal groins on the sides of New River Inlet in Onslow County and Bogue Inlet between Carteret and Onslow Counties.
-
A local government may not use funds generated from any of the following financing mechanisms for any activity related to the terminal groin or its accompanying beach fill project:
- Special obligation bonds issued pursuant to Article 7A of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes.
- Nonvoted general obligation bonds issued pursuant to G.S. 159-48(b)(4).
- Financing contracts entered into under G.S. 160A-20 or G.S. 159-148 .
-
No later than January 1, 2019, and every five years thereafter, the Coastal Resources Commission shall report to the Environmental Review Commission on the implementation of this section. The report shall provide a detailed description of each proposed and permitted terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project, including the information required to be submitted pursuant to subsection (e) of this section. For each permitted terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project, the report shall also provide all of the following:
- The findings of the Commission required pursuant to subsection (f) of this section.
- The status of construction and maintenance of the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project, including the status of the implementation of the plan for construction and maintenance and the inlet management plan.
- A description and assessment of the benefits of the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project, if any.
- A description and assessment of the adverse impacts of the terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project, if any, including a description and assessment of any mitigation measures implemented to address adverse impacts.
History. 2003-427, s. 3; 2004-195, s. 1.2; 2004-203, s. 43; 2011-387, s. 1; 2012-201, s. 2(a); 2013-384, s. 3(a); 2015-241, ss. 14.6(r), 14.30(v); 2017-10, s. 4.19; 2018-114, s. 15; 2020-3, s. 4.30(b).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2011-387, in its preamble, provides: “Whereas, it has been the policy of the State of North Carolina since 1985, as stated in the Coastal Area Management Act and rules adopted pursuant to the act, to give preference to nonstructural responses to erosion, including relocation of threatened structures, beach nourishment, inlet relocation, and the temporary use of sandbags for short-term stabilization; and
“Whereas, a terminal groin is a permanent erosion control structure that is constructed on the side of an inlet at the terminus of an island generally perpendicular to the shoreline to limit or control sediment passage into the inlet channel; and
“Whereas, a terminal groin may reduce beach erosion, reduce the frequency of beach nourishment projects, and slow the migration of inlets; and
“Whereas, the use of terminal groins on inlet beaches may adversely impact the value and enjoyment of adjacent properties, damage the public beach, obstruct public access to the beach and to navigable waters, and result in increased erosion to adjacent and downdrift properties; and
“Whereas, due to the uncertainties associated with the costs and benefits of terminal groins, it is reasonable to authorize the Coastal Resources Commission to establish a terminal groin pilot program under which the Commission may permit the construction of up to four terminal groins under certain conditions; and
“Whereas, it is reasonable to authorize the Coastal Resources Commission to permit the construction of a terminal groin under the pilot program if the Commission finds that (i) structures or infrastructure are imminently threatened by erosion and that nonstructural approaches to erosion control are impractical; (ii) the terminal groin will be accompanied by a concurrent beach fill project; (iii) construction and maintenance of the terminal groin will not result in significant adverse impacts to private property or to the public recreational beach; (iv) the terminal groin will be managed pursuant to an inlet management plan; and (v) there are sufficient financial resources to cover the costs associated with the terminal groin; Now, therefore,”
Session Laws 2011-387, s. 4, provides: “No State funds may be spent for any activities related to a terminal groin and its accompanying beach fill project permitted pursuant to G.S. 113A-115.1 , as amended by Section 1 of this act, unless the General Assembly enacts legislation appropriating funds explicitly for such purpose. This section shall not apply to any beach fill or beach nourishment project initiated prior to the effective date of this act.”
Sessions Laws 2018-114, s. 29, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2004-195, s. 1.2, effective August 17, 2004, substituted “control” for “coastal” in subsection (b).
Session Laws 2004-203, s. 43, effective August 17, 2004, substituted “control” for “coastal” in the last sentence of subsection (b).
Session Laws 2011-387, s. 1, effective June 28, 2011, added subdivisions (a)(1a) and (a)(3); subdivided former subsection (b), adding “of the following” in the introductory paragraph, adding the subdivision (b)(1) and (b)(2) designations, and therein making minor stylistic changes, and adding subdivision (b)(3) and the subsection (b1) designation; in subsection (c), twice substituted “July 1, 1995” for “1 July 1995”; and added subsections (d) through (h).
Session Laws 2012-201, s. 2(a), effective August 1, 2012, added subsection (i).
Session Laws 2013-384, s. 3(a), effective August 23, 2013, deleted former subdivision (a)(3) and added present subdivision (a)(3); deleted subdivision (f)(2) and sub-subdivision (e)(6)d.; substituted “subsection” for “section” in subsection (b); substituted “threatened by erosion” for “imminently threatened by erosion, and nonstructural approaches to erosion control, including relocation of threatened structures, are impractical” in subdivision (e)(1); added the second and third sentences in subdivision (e)(5); rewrote subdivision (e)(6); deleted “as provided in the inlet management plan” following “measures” in sub-subdivision (e)(6)b., and following “groin” in sub-subdivision (e)(6)c.; added “the potential benefits ... infrastructure, and” in subdivision (f)(4); and in subsection (h), substituted “A local government may not use funds” for “No permit may be issued where funds are,” and deleted “and would be used” following “financing mechanisms.” For applicability, see editor’s note.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.6(r), effective July 1, 2015, in subsection (g), substituted “six permits” for “four permits” and added “provided that two of the six permits may be issued only for the construction of terminal groins on the sides of New River Inlet in Onslow County and Bogue Inlet between Carteret and Onslow Counties” at the end.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (e)(6).
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 4.19, effective May 4, 2017, substituted “January 1, 2019, and every five years thereafter” for “September 1 of each year” in the beginning of subsection (i).
Session Laws 2018-114, s. 15, effective June 27, 2018, rewrote subsection (c), and added subsection (c1).
Session Laws 2020-3, s. 4.30(b), effective July 1, 2020, substituted “Article 7A of Chapter 159” for “Chapter 159I” in subdivision (h)(1).
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “North Carolina Oceanfront Property and Public Waters and Beaches: The Rights of Littoral Owners in the Twenty-First Century,” see 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1427 (2005).
CASE NOTES
Substantial Private Property Interest Outweighed Competing Public Interests. —
Trial court did not err in reversing the decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission to deny a request for a variance by the manager of a homeowners’ association because the manager’s substantial private property interest outweighed the competing public interests; if sandbags were removed, the manager’s condos faced potential destruction from erosion, and the manager proposed a new beach renourishment solution, and if the solution was successful, it would not need the sandbags. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Part 4. Permit Letting and Enforcement.
§ 113A-116. Local government letter of intent.
Within two years after July 1, 1974, each county and city within the coastal area shall submit to the Commission a written statement of its intent to act, or not to act, as a permit-letting agency under G.S. 113A-121 . If any city or county states its intent not to act as a permit-letting agency or fails to submit a statement of intent within the required period, the Secretary shall issue permits therein under G.S. 113A-121 ; provided that a county may submit a letter of intent to issue permits in any city within said county that disclaims its intent to issue permits or fails to submit a letter of intent. Provided, however, should any city or county fail to become a permit-letting agency for any reason, but shall later express its desire to do so, it shall be permitted by the Coastal Resources Commission to qualify as such an agency by following the procedure herein set forth for qualification in the first instance.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, ss. 2, 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1989, c. 727, s. 129.
Express Review Pilot Program.
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 11.4A(a)-(e), provides:
“(a) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may develop the Express Review Pilot Program, a pilot program to provide express permit and certification reviews. Participation in the Express Review Pilot Program is voluntary, and the program is to become supported by the fees determined pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall determine the project applications to review under the Express Review Pilot Program from those who request to participate in the Pilot Program. The Express Review Pilot Program may be applied to any one or all of the permits, approvals, or certifications in the following programs: the erosion and sedimentation control program, the coastal management program, and the water quality programs, including water quality certifications and stormwater management. The Express Review Pilot Program shall focus on the following permits or certifications:
“(1) Stormwater permits under Part 1 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(2) Stream origination certifications under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(3) Water quality certification under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.
“(4) Erosion and sedimentation control permits under Article 4 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
“(5) Permits under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), Part 4 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
“(b) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish up to eight positions to administer the Express Review Pilot Program and may determine the fees for express application review under the Pilot Program. Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3 D, the maximum permit application fee to be charged under subsection (a) of this section for the express review of a project application requiring all of the permits under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500). Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3 D, the maximum permit application fee to be charged for the express review of a project application requiring all of the permits under subdivisions (1) through (4) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500). Notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3D, the maximum permit application fee charged for the express review of a project application for any other combination of permits under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section shall not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000). Express review of a project application involving additional permits or certifications issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources other than those under subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section may be allowed by the Department, and, notwithstanding G.S. 143-215.3D or any other statute or rule that sets a permit fee, the maximum permit application fee charged for the express review of a project application shall not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000), plus one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the fee that would otherwise apply by statute or rule for that particular permit or certification. Additional fees, not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the original permit application fee under this section, may be charged for subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit applications. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish the procedure by which the amount of the fees under this subsection is determined, and the fees and procedures are not rules under G.S. 150B-2(8a) for the Express Review Pilot Program under this section.
“(c) The funds appropriated to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in this act for the 2003-2004 fiscal year shall be used for the costs of implementing the Express Review Pilot Program under this section during the 2003-2004 fiscal year.
“(d) The Express Review Fund is created as a special nonreverting fund. The Express Review Fund shall be used for the costs of implementing the Express Review Pilot Program under this section. All fees collected under this section shall be credited to the Express Review Fund. If the Express Review Pilot Program is abolished, the funds in the Express Review Fund shall be credited to the General Fund.
“(e) No later than May 1, 2004, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall report to the General Assembly its findings on the success of the Express Review Pilot Program and whether it recommends that the Pilot Program be continued or expanded.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 12.9(a)-(f), provides: “(a) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall continue the Express Review Pilot Program established by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 that was implemented in the Wilmington and Raleigh regional offices and shall expand the Express Review Pilot Program to two additional regional offices within the Department, to be selected by the Department based on the Department’s determination of where the Pilot Program is most needed.
“(b) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall continue and support the eight positions that were authorized under Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. This expanded Program and these positions and support shall be funded from the Express Review Fund, created by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284.
“(c) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish and support four additional positions to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. These positions and support may be funded for the 2004-2005 fiscal year from funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for this purpose. It is the intent of the General Assembly that these positions and support be funded in future fiscal years from the Express Review Fund.
“(d) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources may establish and support four additional positions to administer the expanded Express Review Pilot Program under this section. These positions and support shall be funded from the Express Review Fund, created by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284.
“(e) No later than March 1, 2005, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall report to the Fiscal Research Division and the Environmental Review Commission its findings on the success of the continued Express Pilot Review Program and whether it recommends that the Program be continued or expanded and any other findings or recommendations, including any legislative proposals, that it deems pertinent.
“(f) Subsection (c) of this section becomes effective January 1, 2005. The remaining subsections of this section become effective July 1, 2004.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 12.2(b), effective July 1, 2005, provides: “The Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall expand to a statewide program that operates in each regional office of the Department the Express Review Pilot Program established by Section 11.4A of S.L. 2003-284 and expanded by Section 12.9 of S.L. 2004-124, and the provisions of G.S. 143B-279.13, as enacted by subsection (a) of this section, shall apply to this statewide program.”
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2003’.”
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.5 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2004’.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 33.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2004-2005 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2004-2005 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2004-124, s. 33.5, contains a severability clause.
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2005’.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.5 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 9.14(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wind turbines and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. If Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, becomes law, the provisions of Part 12 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes as enacted by that act shall not apply to the facilities authorized by this section. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Senate Bill 1068, 2009 Regular Session, did not become law.
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2009’.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.5 is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(a), provides: “The General Assembly finds that strengthening research and development efforts on renewable energy sources is critical to North Carolina’s environment and economy, and that recent events resulting from the British Petroleum oil spill amplify the need for North Carolina’s innovators and scientists to enhance their efforts to develop sustainable energy sources and technologies that do not threaten the health and well-being of the State’s waters, sensitive lands, and residents. In order to provide opportunities for research into tidal, wave, and other ocean-based sources of alternative energy, the University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute shall form a consortium with the Colleges of Engineering at North Carolina State University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte to study the capture of energy from ocean waves. The Coastal Studies Institute shall be designated the lead agency in coordinating these efforts. Funding appropriated by this act shall be used by university scientists to conceptualize, design, construct, operate, and market new and innovative technologies designed to harness and maximize the energy of the ocean in order to provide substantial power generation for the State. Funding may be used to leverage federal or private research funding for this purpose, but may not be used to purchase and utilize technology that has already been developed by others unless that technology is a critical component to North Carolina’s research efforts. Wave energy technologies developed and used for this research may be attached to or staged from an existing State-owned structure located in the ocean waters of the State, and data generated by these technologies shall be available at this structure for public education and awareness. It is the intent of the General Assembly that North Carolina become the focal point for marine-based ocean research collaborations involving the nation’s public and private universities.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 9.10(b), provides: “With respect to the demonstration wave energy facility and necessary support facilities authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the facilities authorized under this act shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of general law applicable to the construction of State facilities, except that the State Property Office shall expedite and grant all easements and use agreements required for construction of the facilities without payment of any fee, royalty, or other cost. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, construction of the facilities authorized by this section shall be exempt from the following statutes and rules implementing those statutes: G.S. 143-48 through 143-64, 143-128, 143-129, 143-132, 113A-1 through 113A-10, 113A-50 through 113A-66, and 113A-116 through 113A-128. With respect to any other environmental permits required for construction of the facilities, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources is directed to expedite permitting of the project to the extent allowed by law and shall waive any application fees that would be otherwise applicable to applications for permits required for the facilities and, where possible under applicable law, issue all permits within 40 days of receipt of a complete application.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2010’.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2010-2011 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.6, is a severability clause.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
§ 113A-117. Implementation and enforcement programs.
- The Secretary shall develop and present to the Commission for consideration and to all cities and counties and lead regional organizations within the coastal area for comment a set of criteria for local implementation and enforcement programs. In the preparation of such criteria, the Secretary shall emphasize the necessity for the expeditious processing of permit applications. Said criteria may contain recommendations and guidelines as to the procedures to be followed in developing local implementation and enforcement programs, the scope and coverage of said programs, minimum standards to be prescribed in said programs, staffing of permit-letting agencies, permit-letting procedures, and priorities of regional or statewide concern. Within 20 months after July 1, 1974, the Commission shall adopt and transmit said criteria (with any revisions) to each coastal-area county and city that has filed an applicable letter of intent, for its guidance.
- The governing body of each city in the coastal area that filed an affirmative letter of intent shall adopt an implementation and enforcement plan with respect to its zoning area within 36 months after July 1, 1974. The board of commissioners of each coastal-area county that filed an affirmative letter of intent shall adopt an implementation plan with respect to portions of the county outside city zoning areas within 36 months after July 1, 1974, provided, however, that a county implementation and enforcement plan may also cover city jurisdictions for those cities within the counties that have not filed affirmative letters of intent pursuant to G.S. 113A-116 . Prior to adopting the implementation and enforcement program the local governing body shall hold a public hearing at which public and private parties shall have the opportunity to present comments and views. Notice of the hearing shall be given not less than 15 days before the date of the hearing, and shall state the date, time and place of the hearing, the subject of the hearing, and the action which is to be taken. The notice shall state that copies of the proposed implementation and enforcement program are available for public inspection at the county courthouse. Any such notice shall be published at least once in one newspaper of general circulation in the county at least 15 days before the date on which the public hearing is scheduled to begin.
- Each coastal-area county and city shall transmit its implementation and enforcement program when adopted to the Commission for review. The Commission shall afford interested persons an opportunity to present objections and comments regarding the program, and shall review and consider each local implementation and enforcement program submitted in light of such objections and comments, the Commission’s criteria and any general standards of review applicable throughout the coastal area as may be adopted by the Commission. Within 45 days after receipt of a local implementation and enforcement program the Commission shall either approve the program or notify the county or city of the specific changes that must be made in order for it to be approved. Following such changes, the program may be resubmitted in the same manner as the original program.
- If the Commission determines that any local government is failing to administer or enforce an approved implementation and enforcement program, it shall notify the local government in writing and shall specify the deficiencies of administration and enforcement. If the local government has not taken corrective action within 90 days of receipt of notification from the Commission, the Commission shall assume enforcement of the program until such time as the local government indicates its willingness and ability to resume administration and enforcement of the program.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, ss. 3, 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1989, c. 727, s. 130.
§ 113A-118. Permit required.
- After the date designated by the Secretary pursuant to G.S. 113A-125 , every person before undertaking any development in any area of environmental concern shall obtain (in addition to any other required State or local permit) a permit pursuant to the provisions of this Part.
- Under the expedited procedure provided for by G.S. 113A-121 , the permit shall be obtained from the appropriate city or county for any minor development; provided, that if the city or county has not developed an approved implementation and enforcement program, the permit shall be obtained from the Secretary.
- Permits shall be obtained from the Commission or its duly authorized agent.
-
Within the meaning of this Part:
- A “major development” is any development which requires permission, licensing, approval, certification or authorization in any form from the Environmental Management Commission, the Department of Environmental Quality, the Department of Administration, the North Carolina Oil and Gas Commission, the North Carolina Pesticides Board, the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Board, or any federal agency or authority; or which occupies a land or water area in excess of 20 acres; or which contemplates drilling for or excavating natural resources on land or under water; or which occupies on a single parcel a structure or structures in excess of a ground area of 60,000 square feet.
- A “minor development” is any development other than a “major development.”
- If, within the meaning of G.S. 113A-103(5)b3, the siting of any utility facility for the development, generation or transmission of energy is subject to regulation under this Article rather than by the State Utilities Commission or by other law, permits for such facilities shall be obtained from the Coastal Resources Commission rather than from the appropriate city or county.
- The Secretary may issue special emergency permits under this Article. These permits may only be issued in those extraordinary situations in which life or structural property is in imminent danger as a result of storms, sudden failure of man-made structures, or similar occurrence. These permits may carry any conditions necessary to protect the public interest, consistent with the emergency situation and the impact of the proposed development. If an application for an emergency permit includes work beyond that necessary to reduce imminent dangers to life or property, the emergency permit shall be limited to that development reasonably necessary to reduce the imminent danger; all further development shall be considered under ordinary permit procedures. This emergency permit authority of the Secretary shall extend to all development in areas of environmental concern, whether major or minor development, and the mandatory notice provisions of G.S. 113A-119(b) shall not apply to these emergency permits. To the extent feasible, these emergency permits shall be coordinated with any emergency permits required under G.S. 113-229(e1). The fees associated with any permit issued pursuant to this subsection or rules adopted pursuant to this subsection shall be waived.
History. 1973, c. 476, s. 128; c. 1282, ss. 23, 33; c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1979, c. 253, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 173; c. 518, s. 3; 1987, c. 827, s. 136; 1989, c. 727, s. 131; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2007-485, s. 5; 2012-143, s. 1(d); 2014-4, s. 4(c); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Extension of Permits.
For provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009, Session Laws 2009-406, see the notes under G.S. 153A-344.1 and G.S. 160A-385.1.
For provisions pertaining to extension of permits during state of economic emergency in the real estate sector, pursuant to Session Laws 2009-406, ss. 1 through 5.1, as amended by Session Laws 2009-484, s. 5.1, 2009-550, s. 5.2, 2009-572, ss. 1-3, and Session Laws 2010-177, s. 1, see notes appearing under this catchline at G.S. 160A-385.1.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(d), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to reflect the reconstitution of the North Carolina Mining Commission as the North Carolina Mining and Energy Commission as provided in subsection (b) of this section. The Codifier of Rules shall make the conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the reconstitution of the North Carolina Mining Commission to the North Carolina Mining and Energy Commission as provided in subsection (b) of this section.”
Session Laws 2014-4, s. 4(c), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to the General Statutes to reflect renaming of the Mining and Energy Commission to the Oil and Gas Commission, effective August 1, 2015, as provided in this section.” Pursuant to this authority, “North Carolina Oil and Gas Commission” was substituted for “North Carolina Mining and Energy Commission” in subdivision (d)(1).
Session Laws 2014-4, s. 31(a), is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.10A(a)-(e), provides: “(a) The Division of Marine Fisheries and Division of Coastal Management of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources [Department of Environmental Quality] shall, in consultation with representatives of nongovernmental conservation organizations working on oyster restoration, create a new permitting process specifically designed for oyster restoration projects that apply to oyster restoration projects instead of a major development permit under G.S. 113A-118 . The Department shall submit its report, including recommended legislation, to the Environmental Review Commission no later than May 1, 2016.
“(b) Until the effective date of the revised permanent rule that the Coastal Resources Commission is required to adopt pursuant to subsection (d) of this section, the Commission and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall implement 15A NCAC 03O.0503(g)(Scientific or Educational Activity Permit) as provided in subsection (c) of this section.
“(c) Notwithstanding 15A NCAC 03O .0503(g) (Scientific or Educational Activity Permit), the Division of Marine Fisheries may issue a scientific or educational activity permit for approved activities conducted by or under the direction of a nongovernmental conservation organization in addition to a scientific or educational institution. For purposes of this section, a nongovernmental conservation organization is defined as an organization whose primary mission is the conservation of natural resources.
“(d) The Environmental Management Commission shall adopt rules to amend 15A NCAC 03O .0503(g) and any other cross-referenced rules consistent with subsection (c) of this section. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rule adopted by the Commission pursuant to this subsection shall be substantively identical to the provisions of subsection (c) of this section. Rules adopted pursuant to this subsection are not subject to Part 3 of Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Rules adopted pursuant to this subsection shall become effective as provided in G.S. 150B-21.3(b1) as though 10 or more written objections had been received as provided by G.S. 150B-21.3(b2).
“(e) This section is effective when this act becomes law. [Expires September 18, 2015] Subsection (c) of this section expires on the date that rules adopted pursuant to subsection (d) of this section become effective.”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2007-485, s. 5, effective August 30, 2007, added the last sentence in subsection (f).
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(d), substituted “Mining and Energy Commission” for “Mining Commission” in subdivision (d)(1).
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (d)(1).
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “The Battle to Preserve North Carolina’s Estuarine Marshes: The 1985 Legislation, Private Claims to Estuarine Marshes, Denial of Permits to Fill, and the Public Trust,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 565 (1986).
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
For article, “Wind Over North Carolina Waters: The State’s Preparedness to Address Offshore and Coastal Water-Based Wind Energy Projects,” see 87 N.C.L. Rev. 1819 (2009).
CASE NOTES
The designation of land as an interim area of environmental concern does not subject development to a permit requirement; it merely requires the developer to give the State 60 days notice before undertaking the proposed activity. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978) (decided under former G.S. 113A-114 ).
Rescission of Permit Upheld. —
Trial court’s rescission of Coastal Area Management Act Development permit was affirmed where there were a variety of ecological concerns, potential environmental damage, and interference with public access to and use of the affected waters, and the whole record showed that the only basis for issuing the permit was that it would make the public waters adjacent to the permittee’s condominium project more convenient for the permittee’s use. Ballance v. North Carolina Coastal Resources Comm'n, 108 N.C. App. 288, 423 S.E.2d 815, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 878 (1992), dismissed, 333 N.C. 789 , 431 S.E.2d 21, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 251 (1993).
§ 113A-118.1. General permits.
-
The Commission may, by rule, designate certain classes of major and minor development for which a general or blanket permit may be issued. In developing these rules, the Commission shall consider:
- The size of the development;
- The impact of the development on areas of environmental concern;
- How often the class of development is carried out;
- The need for onsite oversight of the development; and
- The need for public review and comment on individual development projects.
- General permits may be issued by the Commission. Individual developments carried out under the provisions of general permits shall not be subject to the mandatory notice provisions of G.S. 113A-119 .
- The Commission may impose reasonable notice provisions and other appropriate conditions and safeguards on any general permit it issues.
- The variance, appeals, and enforcement provisions of this Article shall apply to any individual development projects undertaken under a general permit.
- The Commission shall allow the use of riprap in the construction of groins in estuarine and public trust waters on the same basis as the Commission allows the use of wood.
History. 1983, c. 171; c. 442, s. 1; 1987, c. 827, s. 137; 2002-126, s. 29.2(f).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2002-126, s. 29.2(g), provides: “The Coastal Resources Commission shall not enforce any provision of any rule that is inconsistent with G.S. 113A-118.1(e), as enacted by this act, and the Commission shall amend its rules as may be required to conform with G.S. 113A-118.1(e), as enacted by this act.”
Session Laws 2002-126, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations, Capital Improvements, and Finance Act of 2002’.”
Session Laws 2002-126, s. 31.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2002-2003 fiscal year. For example, uncodified provisions of this act relating to the Medicaid program apply only to the 2002-2003 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2002-126, s. 31.6, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2003-427, s. 1, provides: “Pursuant to G.S. 113A-118.1 , the Coastal Resources Commission may adopt temporary and permanent rules to establish a general permit to allow the construction of offshore parallel sills made of stone or other suitable riprap materials for shoreline protection in conjunction with existing, created, or restored wetlands. The permit shall be applicable only where a shoreline is experiencing erosion in public trust areas and estuarine waters. The permit shall not apply to oceanfront shorelines or to waters and shorelines adjacent to the ocean hazard areas of environmental concern except that the permit may apply to those shorelines that exhibit characteristics of estuarine shorelines. Characteristics of estuarine shorelines include the presence of wetland vegetation, lower wave energy, and lower erosion rates than are generally characteristic of ocean erodible areas. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-21.1 (a), the authorization to adopt temporary rules pursuant to this section shall continue in effect until 1 July 2004. Reference to this section shall satisfy the requirement for a statement of finding of need for a temporary rule set out in G.S. 150B-21.1 .”
Session Laws 2003-427, s. 2, provides: “The fee for a general permit established by temporary rules pursuant to Section 1 of this act shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00). In adopting permanent rules pursuant to Section 1 of this act, the Coastal Resources Commission shall set a fee for the general permit as provided in G.S. 113A-119.1 .”
§ 113A-118.2. Development in Primary Nursery Areas and Outstanding Resource Waters areas of environmental concern.
Public notice, opportunity for public comment, and agency review shall be required for all development within the Primary Nursery Areas or Outstanding Resource Waters areas of environmental concern. Provided, however, that the Coastal Resources Commission may by rule exempt or issue general permits for minor maintenance and improvement projects as defined in G.S. 113A-103(5)c and for single-family residential development pursuant to use standards or conditions adopted by the Coastal Resources Commission.
History. 1989, c. 217, s. 2.
§ 113A-119. Permit applications generally.
- Any person required to obtain a permit under this Part shall file with the Secretary and (in the case of a permit sought from a city or county) with the designated local official an application for a permit in accordance with the form and content designated by the Secretary and approved by the Commission. The applicant must submit with the application an electronic payment, check, or money order payable to the Department or the city or county, as the case may be, constituting a fee set by the Commission pursuant to G.S. 113A-119.1 .
- Upon receipt of any application, a significant modification to an application for a major permit, or an application to modify substantially a previously issued major permit, the Secretary shall issue public notice of the proposed development (i) with the exception of minor permit applications, by posting or causing to be posted a notice at the location of the proposed development stating that an application, a modification of an application for a major permit, or an application to modify a previously issued major permit for development has been made, where the application or modification may be inspected, and the time period for comments; and (ii) with the exception of minor permit applications, by publishing notice of the application or modification at least once in one newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties wherein the development would be located at least 20 days before final action on a major permit or before the beginning of the hearing on a permit under G.S. 113A-122 . The notice shall set out that any comments on the development should be submitted to the Secretary by a specified date, not less than 15 days from the date of the newspaper publication of the notice or 15 days after mailing of the mailed notice, whichever is later.
- Within the meaning of this Part, the “designated local official” is the official who has been designated by the local governing body to receive and consider permit applications under this Part.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 307; 1985, c. 372; 1989, c. 53; c. 727, s. 132; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 987, s. 1; 2013-413, s. 30; 2017-209, s. 5(b); 2020-74, s. 2; 2021-158, s. 2(a).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(c), made subsection (b) of this section, as amended by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(a), effective July 1, 2021, and applicable to permit applications received on or after that date.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2013-413, s. 30, in subsection (b), added “with the exception of minor permit applications” following “(iii),” deleted “and at least seven days before final action on a permit under G.S. 113A-121 ” following “major permit” near the end of the first sentence, and deleted the last sentence, which formerly read “Public notice under this subsection if mandatory, except for a proposed modification to an application for a minor permit or proposed modification of a previously issued minor permit that does not substantially alter the original project.” For effective date, see editor’s note.
Session Laws 2017-209, s. 5(b), effective October 4, 2017, in the first sentence of subsection (b), inserted “with the exception of minor permit applications”.
Session Laws 2020-74, s. 2, effective July 1, 2020, substituted “an electronic payment, check” for “a check” in the second sentence of subsection (a).
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(a), in subsection (b), deleted “by mailing a copy of the application or modification, or a brief description thereof together with a statement indicating where a detailed copy of the proposed development may be inspected, to any citizen or group which has filed a request to be notified of the proposed development, and to any interested State agency; (ii)” following “(i)” and substituted present “(ii)” for “(iii).” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-119.1. Permit fees.
- The Commission shall have the power to establish a graduated fee schedule for the processing of applications for permits, renewals of permits, modifications of permits, or transfers of permits issued pursuant to this Article. In determining the fee schedule, the Commission shall consider the administrative and personnel costs incurred by the Department for processing the applications, related compliance activities, and the complexity of the development sought to be undertaken for which a permit is required under this Article. The fee to be charged for processing an application may not exceed four hundred dollars ($400.00). The total funds collected from fees authorized by the Commission pursuant to this section in any fiscal year shall not exceed thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the total personnel and administrative costs incurred by the Department for permit processing and compliance programs within the Division of Coastal Area Management.
- Fees collected under this section shall be applied to the costs of administering this Article.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1991 (Regular Session, 1992), c. 1039, s. 4.
History. 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 987, s. 2; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1039, s. 4.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2003-427, s. 2, provides: “The fee for a general permit established by temporary rules pursuant to Section 1 of this act shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00). In adopting permanent rules pursuant to Section 1 of this act, the Coastal Resources Commission shall set a fee for the general permit as provided in G.S. 113A-119.1 .”
§ 113A-119.2. Review of offshore fossil fuel facilities.
-
In addition to the definitions set out in
G.S. 113A-103
, as used in this section, the following definitions shall apply:
- “Coastal fishing waters” has the same meaning as in G.S. 113-129 .
- “Discharge” has the same meaning as in G.S. 143-215.77 .
-
“Offshore fossil fuel facility” means those facilities for the exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas which, because of their size, magnitude, or scope of impacts, have the potential to affect any land or water use or natural resource of the coastal area. For purposes of this definition, offshore fossil fuel facilities shall include, but are not limited to:
- Structures, including drill ships and floating platforms and structures relocated from other states or countries, located in coastal fishing waters.
- Any equipment associated with a structure described in sub-subdivision a. of this subdivision, including, but not limited to, pipelines and vessels that are used to carry, transport, or transfer oil, natural gas, liquid natural gas, liquid propane gas, or synthetic gas.
- Onshore support or staging facilities associated with a structure described in sub-subdivision a. of this subdivision.
- “Oil” has the same meaning as in G.S. 143-215.77 .
-
In addition to any other information necessary to determine consistency with State guidelines adopted pursuant to
G.S. 113A-107
, the following information is required for the review of an offshore fossil fuel facility located in coastal fishing waters:
- All information required to be included in an Exploration Plan required pursuant to Subpart B of Part 250 of 30 C.F.R. (July 1, 2009 edition).
- All information required to be included in an Oil-Spill Response Plan required pursuant to Subpart B of Part 254 of 30 C.F.R. (July 1, 2009 edition).
- An assessment of alternatives to the proposed offshore fossil fuel facility that would minimize the likelihood of an unauthorized discharge.
- An assessment of the potential for an unauthorized discharge to cause temporary or permanent violations of the federal and State water quality standards, including the antidegradation policy adopted pursuant to section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)).
- Any other information that the Commission determines necessary for consistency review.
History. 2010-179, s. 2.
§ 113A-120. Grant or denial of permits.
-
The responsible official or body shall deny an application for a permit upon finding:
- In the case of coastal wetlands, that the development would contravene an order that has been or could be issued pursuant to G.S. 113-230 .
- In the case of estuarine waters, that a permit for the development would be denied pursuant to G.S. 113-229(e).
- In the case of a renewable resource area, that the development will result in loss or significant reduction of continued long-range productivity that would jeopardize one or more of the water, food or fiber requirements of more than local concern identified in subdivisions a through c of G.S. 113A-113(b)(3).
- In the case of a fragile or historic area, or other area containing environmental or natural resources of more than local significance, that the development will result in major or irreversible damage to one or more of the historic, cultural, scientific, environmental or scenic values or natural systems identified in subdivisions a through h of G.S. 113A-113(b)(4).
- In the case of areas covered by G.S. 113A-113(b)(5), that the development will jeopardize the public rights or interests specified in said subdivision.
- In the case of natural hazard areas, that the development would occur in one or more of the areas identified in subdivisions a through e of G.S. 113A-113(b)(6) in such a manner as to unreasonably endanger life or property.
- In the case of areas which are or may be impacted by key facilities, that the development is inconsistent with the State guidelines or the local land-use plans, or would contravene any of the provisions of subdivisions (1) to (6) of this subsection.
- In any case, that the development is inconsistent with the State guidelines or the local land-use plans.
- In any case, that considering engineering requirements and all economic costs there is a practicable alternative that would accomplish the overall project purposes with less adverse impact on the public resources.
- In any case, that the proposed development would contribute to cumulative effects that would be inconsistent with the guidelines set forth in subdivisions (1) through (9) of this subsection. Cumulative effects are impacts attributable to the collective effects of a number of projects and include the effects of additional projects similar to the requested permit in areas available for development in the vicinity.
-
In the absence of such findings, a permit shall be granted. The permit may be conditioned upon the applicant’s amending his proposal to take whatever measures or agreeing to carry out whatever terms of operation or use of the development that are reasonably necessary to protect the public interest with respect to the factors enumerated in subsection (a) of this section.
(b1)
In addition to those factors set out in subsection (a) of this section, and notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, the responsible official or body may deny an application for a permit upon finding that an applicant, or any parent or subsidiary corporation if the applicant is a corporation:
- Is conducting or has conducted any activity causing significant environmental damage for which a major development permit is required under this Article without having previously obtained such permit or has received a notice of violation with respect to any activity governed by this Article and has not complied with the notice within the time specified in the notice;
- Has failed to pay a civil penalty assessed pursuant to this Article, a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article, or Article 17 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes which is due and for which no appeal is pending;
- Has been convicted of a misdemeanor pursuant to G.S. 113A-126 , G.S. 113-229(k), or any criminal provision of a local ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article; or
-
Has failed to substantially comply with State rules or local ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant to this Article or with other federal and state laws, regulations, and rules for the protection of the environment.
(b2) For purposes of subsection (b1) of this section, an applicant’s record may be considered for only the two years prior to the application date.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1989, c. 676, s. 7.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 518, ss. 4, 5; 1987, c. 827, s. 138; 1989, c. 51; c. 676, s. 7; 1997-337, s. 2; 1997-456, s. 55.2B; 1997-496, s. 2; 2000-172, s. 2.1.
Editor’s Note.
The first instance of the word “State” in both versions of subdivision (b1)(4) above was designated as “state” in Session Laws 1997-496, s. 2; it has been capitalized at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Session Laws 1997-337, s. 3, as amended by Session Laws 1997-456, s. 55.2B, and Session Laws 2000-172, s. 2.1, provides that the 1997 amendment to this section, which amended subsection (b1), is effective July 25, 1997, expires April 1, 2001, and is applicable to permits granted or applications submitted prior to April 1, 2001, which shall be transferable.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “The Battle to Preserve North Carolina’s Estuarine Marshes: The 1985 Legislation, Private Claims to Estuarine Marshes, Denial of Permits to Fill, and the Public Trust,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 565 (1986).
For 1997 legislative survey, see 20 Campbell L. Rev. 450 (1998).
For article, “North Carolina Oceanfront Property and Public Waters and Beaches: The Rights of Littoral Owners in the Twenty-First Century,” see 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1427 (2005).
CASE NOTES
Formal findings are not required when a permit is issued. Pamlico Tar River Found., Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 103 N.C. App. 24, 404 S.E.2d 167, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 569 (1991).
Evidence Required When Opposing Issuance of Permit. —
The failure to include evidence supporting Division of Coastal Management’s (DCM’s) decision to issue a permit in the DCM record is not relevant on the issue before Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) of whether an organization opposed to issuance of the permit was entitled to a contested case hearing. The only relevant evidence on this issue is evidence of whether there has been a violation of some substantive statute, rule or regulation. Pamlico Tar River Found., Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 103 N.C. App. 24, 404 S.E.2d 167, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 569 (1991).
§ 113A-120.1. Variances.
-
Any person may petition the Commission for a variance granting permission to use the person’s land in a manner otherwise prohibited by rules or standards prescribed by the Commission, or orders issued by the Commission, pursuant to this Article. To qualify for a variance, the petitioner must show all of the following:
- Unnecessary hardships would result from strict application of the rules, standards, or orders.
- The hardships result from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as the location, size, or topography of the property.
- The hardships did not result from actions taken by the petitioner.
- The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the rules, standards, or orders; will secure public safety and welfare; and will preserve substantial justice.
- The Commission may impose reasonable and appropriate conditions and safeguards upon any variance it grants.
History. 1989, c. 676, s. 8; 2002-68, s. 1.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Wind Over North Carolina Waters: The State’s Preparedness to Address Offshore and Coastal Water-Based Wind Energy Projects,” see 87 N.C.L. Rev. 1819 (2009).
CASE NOTES
Separation of Powers. —
Trial court did not err in determining the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission’s actions did not violate the separation of powers doctrine; since subsection (a) explicitly contemplates the Commission’s issuance of variances, it is self-evident that judicial authority to rule on variance requests is reasonably necessary to accomplish the Commission’s statutory purpose. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Commission does not Need to Make Reasonable Use Determination. —
Trial court did not err in determining the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission did not need to make a “reasonable use” determination; the amendment to the statute shifted the burden of proving the four variance factors to petitioners, and consequently, the Commission does not need to make a “reasonable use” determination before denying a variance request. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Estoppel from Challenging Regulatory Scheme. —
Plaintiffs’ acknowledgment in their complaint that they sought, received and took full advantage of a variance for an erosion control structure pursuant to the regulatory scheme which they were challenging precluded them from asserting claim that the hardened structure rules and regulatory scheme under which the rules were promulgated were invalid and unconstitutional. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. Tomlinson, 134 N.C. App. 217, 517 S.E.2d 406, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 751 (1999).
Substantial Private Property Interest Outweighed Competing Public Interests. —
Trial court did not err in reversing the decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission to deny a request for a variance by the manager of a homeowners’ association because the manager’s substantial private property interest outweighed the competing public interests; if sandbags were removed, the manager’s condos faced potential destruction from erosion, and the manager proposed a new beach renourishment solution, and if the solution was successful, it would not need the sandbags. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Unnecessary Hardships Established. —
Trial court did not err in reversing the decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission to deny a request for a variance filed by the manager of a homeowners’ association because the manager suffered unnecessary hardships; the Commission improperly focused its analysis on the property-owner rather than the property, and the manager’s previous permit and variances were immaterial to its “unnecessary hardships” analysis. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
Substantial Evidence Supported Variance Denial. —
As a decision by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission, denying property owners’ request under G.S. 113A-120.1(a) for a variance from an erosion setback requirement, was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious, a trial court erred when it failed to affirm it under the whole record test. Midgett v. N. Carolina Coastal Res. Comm'n, 212 N.C. App. 420, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 1058 (2011).
Standard of Review. —
Trial court appropriately applied de novo review to the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission’s first variance factor determination because the only issue was whether the manager of a homeowners’ association suffered unnecessary hardships; the trial court appropriately applied the whole record test to determine whether the facts were supported by substantial evidence and de novo review to the Commission’s legal determinations under the Coastal Area Management Act’s statutory framework. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'n of N.C. 228 N.C. App. 630, 747 S.E.2d 301, 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 818 (2013), aff'd, 367 N.C. 643 , 766 S.E.2d 320, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 951 (2014).
§ 113A-120.2.
Expired April 1, 2001.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 1997-337, s. 3, as amended by Session Laws 1997-456, s. 55.2B, and Session Laws 2000-172, s. 2.1, provided that this section, relating to permits for urban waterfront redevelopment in historically urban areas, and the allowance of certain nonwater dependent uses, was effective July 25, 1997, would expire April 1, 2001, and was applicable to permits granted or applications submitted prior to April 1, 2001, which were to be transferable.
Session Laws 2000-172, s. 2.2, as amended by Session Laws 2000-140, s. 92.1(b), effective August 2, 2000, provided that notwithstanding G.S. 150B-21.3(a) and 26 NCAC 2C.0102(11), the Coastal Resources Commission was to adopt a temporary rule to establish use standards for waterfront development in urban areas, to replace G.S. 113A-120.2 when it expired. The rule was to become effective April 1, 2001 and was to remain in effect until a permanent rule to replace the temporary rule becomes effective.
Session Laws 2000-172, s. 8.2, is a severability clause.
§ 113A-121. Permits for minor developments under expedited procedures.
- Applications for permits for minor developments shall be expeditiously processed so as to enable their promptest feasible disposition.
- In cities and counties that have developed approved implementation and enforcement programs, applications for permits for minor developments shall be considered and determined by the designated local official of the city or county as the case may be. In cities and counties that have not developed approved implementation and enforcement programs, such applications shall be considered and determined by the Secretary. Minor development projects proposed to be undertaken by a local government within its own permit-letting jurisdiction shall be considered and determined by the Secretary.
- Failure of the Secretary or the designated local official (as the case may be) to approve or deny an application for a minor permit within 25 days from receipt of application shall be treated as approval of the application, except that the Secretary or the designated local official (as the case may be) may extend the deadline by not more than an additional 25 days in exceptional cases. No waiver of the foregoing time limitation (or of the time limitation established in G.S. 113A-122(c)) shall be required of any applicant.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1981, c. 913, s. 2.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 913, s. 2; c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 172, s. 1; c. 399; 1989, c. 727, s. 133.
§ 113A-121.1. Administrative review of permit decisions.
- An applicant for a minor or major development permit who is dissatisfied with the decision on his application may file a petition for a contested case hearing under G.S. 150B-23 within 20 days after the decision is made. When a local official makes a decision to grant or deny a minor development permit and the Secretary is dissatisfied with the decision, the Secretary may file a petition for a contested case within 20 days after the decision is made.
-
A person other than a permit applicant or the Secretary who is dissatisfied with a decision to deny or grant a minor or major development permit may file a petition for a contested case hearing only if the Commission determines that a hearing is appropriate. A request for a determination of the appropriateness of a contested case hearing shall be made in writing and received by the Commission within 20 days after the disputed permit decision is made. A determination of the appropriateness of a contested case shall be made within 30 days after a request for a determination is received and shall be based on whether the person seeking to commence a contested case:
- Has alleged that the decision is contrary to a statute or rule;
- Is directly affected by the decision; and
- Has alleged facts or made legal arguments that demonstrate that the request for the hearing is not frivolous.If the Commission determines a contested case is appropriate, the petition for a contested case shall be filed within 20 days after the Commission makes its determination. A determination that a person may not commence a contested case is a final agency decision and is subject to judicial review under Article 4 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. If, on judicial review, the court determines that the Commission erred in determining that a contested case would not be appropriate, the court shall remand the matter for a contested case hearing under G.S. 150B-23 and final decision on the permit pursuant to G.S. 113A-122 . Decisions in such cases shall be rendered pursuant to those rules, regulations, and other applicable laws in effect at the time of the commencement of the contested case.
- When the applicant seeks administrative review of a decision concerning a permit under subsection (a) of this section, the permit is suspended from the time a person seeks administrative review of the decision concerning the permit until the Commission makes a final decision in the contested case, and no action may be taken during that time that would be unlawful in the absence of a permit.
- A permit challenged under subsection (b) of this section remains in effect unless a stay is issued by the administrative law judge as set forth in G.S. 150B-33 or by a reviewing court as set forth in G.S. 150B-48 .
History. 1981, c. 913, s. 3; 1983, c. 400, ss. 1, 2; 1987, c. 827, s. 139; 1995, c. 409, s. 1; 2011-398, s. 37; 2014-120, s. 23; 2021-158, s. 3(a).
Local Modification.
New Hanover: 1998-212, s. 14.9D.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 3(b), made subsection (b) of this section, as amended by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 3(a), effective October 1, 2021, and applicable to requests for determination of appropriateness received by the Coastal Resources Commission on or after that date.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2011-398, s. 37, effective January 1, 2012, and applicable to contested cases commenced on or after that date, deleted “Commission” preceding “decision” in the third sentence of the last paragraph of subsection (b).
Session Laws 2014-120, s. 23, effective September 18, 2014, rewrote subsection (c) and added subsection (d).
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 3(a), substituted “30 days” for “15 days” in subsection (b) in the introductory language. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
CASE NOTES
Section 150B-43 provides no authority for permitting plaintiff to bypass the requirements of this section because by enacting the provisions for administrative review of rules, the legislature wisely determined that the agency itself should have the first opportunity to review the propriety and applicability of its own rules, and so long as the statutory procedures provide an effective means of review of the agency action, the courts will require parties to exhaust their administrative remedies. Leeuwenburg v. Waterway Inv. Ltd. Partnership, 115 N.C. App. 541, 445 S.E.2d 614, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 718 (1994).
Final Decision by Coastal Resources Commission Required. —
This section requires that a party entitled to its provisions must first challenge a decision to deny or grant a permit by way of a petition to the Coastal Resources Commission, and only after a final decision by the Coastal Resources Commission, may a party invoke the jurisdiction of the superior court. Leeuwenburg v. Waterway Inv. Ltd. Partnership, 115 N.C. App. 541, 445 S.E.2d 614, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 718 (1994).
Burden of Proof. —
If a party other than the applicant or Secretary is dissatisfied with the decision to issue a permit, the party may request a contested case hearing. The party requesting the hearing has the burden of alleging that the permit decision is contrary to a statute or rule, of showing that the party is directly affected by the permit decision, and of showing that the party has a substantial likelihood of prevailing in a contested case. Pamlico Tar River Found., Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 103 N.C. App. 24, 404 S.E.2d 167, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 569 (1991).
In order to obtain a modification or reversal of an agency decision, the party alleging error has the burden of showing that the agency’s final decision may have prejudiced that party’s substantial rights in that the agency’s findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are defective because of one of the six reasons stated under G.S. 150B-51 . Pamlico Tar River Found., Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 103 N.C. App. 24, 404 S.E.2d 167, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 569 (1991).
Relevant Evidence for Entitlement to Contested Case Hearing. —
The failure to include evidence supporting Division of Coastal Management’s (DCM’s) decision to issue a permit in the DCM record is not relevant on the issue before Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) of whether an organization opposed to issuance of the permit was entitled to a contested case hearing. The only relevant evidence on this issue is evidence of whether there has been a violation of some substantive statute, rule or regulation. Pamlico Tar River Found., Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 103 N.C. App. 24, 404 S.E.2d 167, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 569 (1991).
Commission’s Denial of Contested Case Hearing Held Contrary to Subsection (b). —
Where petitioners argued that the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) failed to comply with the procedures for adopting a temporary rule under former G.S. 150B-13, vice-chairman’s order was arbitrary and capricious because it required petitioners to specifically allege that the CRC either acted arbitrarily and capriciously or abused its discretion; this finding did not address the merits of petitioners’ claim and imposed on petitioners an additional burden that subsection (b) of this section did not require. Conservation Council v. Haste, 102 N.C. App. 411, 402 S.E.2d 447, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 432 (1991).
Appellants were entitled to a contested case hearing under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) to contest the Department of Transportation’s decisions as to what measures would be appropriate to protect the southern end of the Herbert C. Bonner Bridge from erosion. Conservation Council v. Haste, 102 N.C. App. 411, 402 S.E.2d 447, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 432 (1991).
§ 113A-122. Procedure for hearings on permit decisions.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
-
The following provisions shall be applicable in connection with hearings pursuant to this section:
-
, (2) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
(3)
A full and complete record of all proceedings at any hearing under this section shall be taken by a reporter appointed by the Commission or by other method approved by the Attorney General. Any party to a proceeding shall be entitled to a copy of such record upon the payment of the reasonable cost thereof as determined by the Commission.
(4) to (6) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
(7) The burden of proof at any hearing on a decision granting a permit shall be upon the person who requested the hearing.
(8), (9) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
(10) The Commission shall grant or deny the permit in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 113A-120 . All such orders and decisions of the Commission shall set forth separately the Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and shall, wherever necessary, cite the appropriate provision of law or other source of authority on which any action or decision of the Commission is based.
(11) The Commission shall have the authority to adopt a seal which shall be the seal of said Commission and which shall be judicially noticed by the courts of the State. Any document, proceeding, order, decree, special order, rule, rule of procedure or any other official act or records of the Commission or its minutes may be certified by the Executive Director under his hand and the seal of the Commission and when so certified shall be received in evidence in all actions or proceedings in the courts of the State without further proof of the identity of the same if such records are competent, relevant and material in any such action to proceedings. The Commission shall have the right to take official notice of all studies, reports, statistical data or any other official reports or records of the federal government or of any sister state and all such records, reports and data may be placed in evidence by the Commission or by any other person or interested party where material, relevant and competent.
-
, (2) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
(3)
A full and complete record of all proceedings at any hearing under this section shall be taken by a reporter appointed by the Commission or by other method approved by the Attorney General. Any party to a proceeding shall be entitled to a copy of such record upon the payment of the reasonable cost thereof as determined by the Commission.
- Failure of the Commission to approve or deny an application for a permit pursuant to this section within 75 days from receipt of application shall be treated as approval of the application, except the Commission may extend the deadline by not more than an additional 75 days in exceptional cases.Failure of the Commission to dispose of an appeal pursuant to this section within 90 days from notice of appeal shall be treated as approval of the action appealed from, except that the Commission may extend the deadline by not more than an additional 90 days if necessary to properly consider the appeal.
- All notices which are required to be given by the Secretary or Commission or by any party to a proceeding under this section shall be given by registered or certified mail to all persons entitled thereto. The date of receipt or refusal for such registered or certified mail shall be the date when such notice is deemed to have been given. Notice by the Commission may be given to any person upon whom a summons may be served in accordance with the provisions of law covering civil actions in the superior courts of this State. The Commission may prescribe the form and content of any particular notice.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1979, c. 253, s. 6; 1981, c. 913, ss. 4-6; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 172, s. 2; 1987, c. 827, s. 140.
§ 113A-123. Judicial review.
- Any person directly affected by any final decision or order of the Commission under this Part may appeal such decision or order to the superior court of the county where the land or any part thereof is located, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Pending final disposition of any appeal, no action shall be taken which would be unlawful in the absence of a permit issued under this Part.
- Any person having a recorded interest or interest by operation of law in or registered claim to land within an area of environmental concern affected by any final decision or order of the Commission under this Part may, within 90 days after receiving notice thereof, petition the superior court to determine whether the petitioner is the owner of the land in question, or an interest, therein, and in case he is adjudged the owner of the subject land, or an interest therein, the court shall determine whether such order so restricts the use of his property as to deprive him of the practical uses thereof, being not otherwise authorized by law, and is therefore an unreasonable exercise of the police power because the order constitutes the equivalent of taking without compensation. The burden of proof shall be on petitioner as to ownership and the burden of proof shall be on the Commission to prove that the order is not an unreasonable exercise of the police power, as aforesaid. Either party shall be entitled to a jury trial on all issues of fact, and the court shall enter a judgment in accordance with the issues, as to whether the Commission order shall apply to the land of the petitioner. The Secretary shall cause a copy of such finding to be recorded forthwith in the register of deeds office in the county where the land is located. The method provided in this subsection for the determination of the issue of whether such order constitutes a taking without compensation shall be exclusive and such issue shall not be determined in any other proceeding. Any action authorized by this subsection shall be calendared for trial at the next civil session of superior court after the summons and complaint have been served for 30 days, regardless of whether issues were joined more than 10 days before the session. It is the duty of the presiding judge to expedite the trial of these actions and to give them a preemptory setting over all others, civil or criminal. From any decision of the superior court either party may appeal to the court of appeals as a matter of right.
- After a finding has been entered that such order shall not apply to certain land as provided in the preceding subsection, the Department of Administration, upon the request of the Commission and upon finding that sufficient funds are available therefor, and with the consent of the Governor and Council of State may take the fee or any lesser interest in such land in the name of the State by eminent domain under the provisions of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes and hold the same for the purposes set forth in this Article.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; c. 1331, s. 3; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, s. 1; 1989, c. 727, s. 134.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
CASE NOTES
Construction with Other Provisions. —
This section does not set forth the scope of review but instead provides that judicial review is available pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 150B of the Administrative Procedure Act. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Right to Trial by Jury. —
This Article, the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), provides for a trial by jury only where a party owning land affected by a final decision of the Coastal Resources Commission petitions the superior court alleging a taking. There is no other statutory authority in CAMA, nor in the Dredge and Fill Act, granting a right to trial by jury. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Simpson, 325 N.C. 514 , 385 S.E.2d 329, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 541 (1989).
Summary judgment is consistent with this section and does not render the statute meaningless. Weeks v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural Resources & Community Dev., 97 N.C. App. 215, 388 S.E.2d 228, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 72 (1990).
Failure to Object or Seek Review of Findings. —
Where plaintiff failed to object to or seek judicial review of commission’s findings of fact pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the findings were binding on plaintiff in a proceeding filed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. Weeks v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural Resources & Community Dev., 97 N.C. App. 215, 388 S.E.2d 228, 1990 N.C. App. LEXIS 72 (1990).
Review of Commission Decisions. —
Argument that subsection (a) of this section provides adequate procedure for judicial review of final decisions or orders of Coastal Resources Commission is without merit; adequate procedure for judicial review would exist under subsection (a) only if the scope of review provided therein were at least equal to that provided by Article 4 of chapter 150B. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Trial court did not err by failing to dismiss property owners’ takings claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the owners had the right to appeal a decision of the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission to the trial court pursuant to G.S. 113A-123(b) once a final order, denying their variance request, was entered. Midgett v. N. Carolina Coastal Res. Comm'n, 212 N.C. App. 420, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 1058 (2011).
Issue Rendered Moot. —
Action of the Coastal Resources Commission, granting plaintiffs’/condo owners’ fourth variance request for construction of erosion control structure, rendered moot issues relating to earlier denials of requests for variances under this section, and court denied plaintiffs who had failed to seek administrative review of its claims the opportunity to assert that those claims had evaded effective review. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. Tomlinson, 134 N.C. App. 286, 517 S.E.2d 401, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 756 (1999).
§ 113A-124. Additional powers and duties.
-
The Secretary shall have the following additional powers and duties under this Article:
- To conduct or cause to be conducted, investigations of proposed developments in areas of environmental concern in order to obtain sufficient evidence to enable a balanced judgment to be rendered concerning the issuance of permits to build such developments.
- To cooperate with the Secretary of the Department of Administration in drafting State guidelines for the coastal area.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(b), effective July 1, 2021, and applicable to permit applications received on or after that date.
- To propose rules to implement this Article for consideration by the Commission.
- To delegate such of his powers as he may deem appropriate to one or more qualified employees of the Department or to any local government, provided that the provisions of any such delegation of power shall be set forth in departmental rules.
- To delegate the power to conduct a hearing, on his behalf, to any member of the Commission or to any qualified employee of the Department. Any person to whom a delegation of power is made to conduct a hearing shall report his recommendations with the record of the hearing to the Secretary for decision or action.
- In order to carry out the provisions of this Article the Secretaries of Administration and of Environmental Quality may employ such clerical, technical and professional personnel, and consultants with such qualifications as the Commission may prescribe, in accordance with the State personnel rules and budgetary laws, and are hereby authorized to pay such personnel from any funds made available to them through grants, appropriations, or any other sources. In addition, the said secretaries may contract with any local governmental unit or lead regional organization to carry out the planning provisions of this Article.
-
The Commission shall have the following additional powers and duties under this Article:
- To recommend to the Secretary the acceptance of donations, gifts, grants, contributions and appropriations from any public or private source to use in carrying out the provisions of this Article.
- To recommend to the Secretary of Administration the acquisition by purchase, gift, condemnation, or otherwise, lands or any interest in any lands within the coastal area.
- To hold such public hearings as the Commission deems appropriate.
- To delegate the power to conduct a hearing, on behalf of the Commission, to any member of the Commission or to any qualified employee of the Department. Any person to whom a delegation of power is made to conduct a hearing shall report his recommendations with the evidence and the record of the hearing to the Commission for decision or action.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 141.
- To delegate the power to determine whether a contested case hearing is appropriate in accordance with G.S. 113A-121.1(b).
- To delegate the power to grant or deny requests for declaratory rulings under G.S. 150B-4 in accordance with standards adopted by the Commission.
- To adopt rules to implement this Article.
- To delegate the power to approve land-use plans in accordance with G.S. 113A-110(f) to any qualified employee of the Department.
- The Attorney General shall act as attorney for the Commission and shall initiate actions in the name of, and at the request of, the Commission, and shall represent the Commission in the hearing of any appeal from or other review of any order of the Commission.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, ss. 125, 141; 1989, c. 727, s. 135; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 839, s. 2; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(v); 2017-209, s. 5(a); 2021-158, s. 2(b).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2014-120, s. 35(a)-(f), provides: “(a) The definitions set out in G.S. 113A-103 apply to this section.
“(b) 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas). — Until the effective date of the revised permanent rule that the Commission is required to adopt pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act, the Commission and the Department shall implement 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) as provided in Section 35(c) of this act.
“(c) Implementation. — Notwithstanding Subparagraph (3) of 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas), the Commission shall not establish any new and shall repeal any existing inlet hazard area in any location with the following characteristics:
“(1) The location is the former location of an inlet, but the inlet has been closed for at least 15 years.
“(2) Due to shoreline migration, the location no longer includes the current location of the inlet.
“(3) The location includes an inlet providing access to a State Port via a channel maintained by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
“(d) Additional Rule-Making Authority. — The Commission shall adopt a rule to amend 15A NCAC 07H.0304 (AECs Within Ocean Hazard Areas) consistent with Section 35(c) of this act. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-19(4), the rule adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be substantively identical to the provisions of Section 35(c) of this act. Rules adopted pursuant to this section are not subject to Part 3 of Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall become effective as provided in G.S. 150B-21.3(b1) as though 10 or more written objections had been received as provided by G.S. 150B-21.3(b2).
“(e) Sunset. — Section 35(c) of this act expires on the date that rules adopted pursuant to Section 35(d) of this act become effective.
“(f) Nothing in this section is intended to prevent the Commission from (i) studying any current inlet hazard area or any other area considered by the Commission for designation as an inlet hazard area, (ii) designating new inlet hazard areas, or (iii) modifying existing inlet hazard areas consistent with Section 35(c) of this act.”
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(c), made the repeal of subdivision (a)(3) by Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(b), effective July 1, 2021, and applicable to permit applications received on or after that date.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretaries of Administration and of Environmental Quality” for “the secretaries of Administration and of Environment and Natural Resources”; and substituted “Environmental Quality” for “Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (e)(6).
Session Laws 2017-209, s. 5(a), effective October 4, 2017, added subdivision (c)(9).
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 2(b), deleted subdivision (a)(3), which read: “To keep a list of interested persons who wish to be notified of proposed developments and proposed rules designating areas of environmental concern and to so notify these persons of such proposed developments by regular mail. A reasonable registration fee to defray the cost of handling and mailing notices may be charged to any person who so registers with the Commission.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-125. Transitional provisions.
- Existing regulatory permits shall continue to be administered within the coastal area by the agencies presently responsible for their administration until a date (not later than 44 months after July 1, 1974), to be designated by the Secretary of Natural and Economic Resources as the permit changeover date. Said designation shall be effective from and after its filing with the Secretary of State.
- From and after the “permit changeover date,” all existing regulatory permits within the coastal area shall be administered in coordination and consultation with (but not subject to the veto of) the Commission. No such existing permit within the coastal area shall be issued, modified, renewed or terminated except after consultation with the Commission. The provisions of this subsection concerning consultation and coordination shall not be interpreted to authorize or require the extension of any deadline established by this Article or any other law for completion of any permit, licensing, certification or other regulatory proceedings.
- Within the meaning of this section, “existing regulatory permits” include dredge and fill permits issued pursuant to G.S. 113-229 ; sand dune permits issued pursuant to G.S. 104B-4; air pollution control and water pollution control permits, special orders or certificates issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1 and 143-215.2, or any other permits, licenses, authorizations, approvals or certificates issued by the Board of Water and Air Resources pursuant to Chapter 143; capacity use area permits issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.15 ; final approval of dams pursuant to G.S. 143-215.30 ; floodway permits issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.54 ; water diversion authorizations issued pursuant to G.S. 143-354(c); oil refinery permits issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.99 ; mining operating permits issued pursuant to G.S. 74-51 ; permissions for construction of wells issued pursuant to G.S. 87-88 ; and rules concerning pesticide application within the coastal area issued pursuant to G.S. 143-458 ; approvals by the Department of Health and Human Services of plans for water supply, drainage or sewerage, pursuant to G.S. 130-161.1 and 130-161.2; standards and approvals for solid waste disposal sites and facilities, adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Chapter 130, Article 13B; permits relating to sanitation of shellfish, crustacea or scallops issued pursuant to Chapter 130, Articles 14A or 14B; permits, approvals, authorizations and rules issued by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Articles 23 or 24 of Chapter 130 with reference to mosquito control programs or districts; any permits, licenses, authorizations, rules, approvals or certificates issued by the Department of Health and Human Services relating to septic tanks or water wells; oil or gas well rules and orders issued for the protection of environmental values or resources pursuant to G.S. 113-391 ; a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the State Utilities Commission pursuant to Chapter 62 for any public utility plant or system, other than a carrier of persons or property; permits, licenses, leases, options, authorization or approvals relating to the use of State forestlands, State parks or other state-owned land issued by the State Department of Administration, the State Department of Natural and Economic Resources or any other State department, agency or institution; any approvals of erosion and sedimentation control plans that may be issued by the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission pursuant to G.S. 113A-60 or 113A-61; and any permits, licenses, authorizations, rules, approvals or certificates issued by any State agency pursuant to any environmental protection legislation not specified in this subsection that may be enacted prior to the permit changeover date.
- The Commission shall conduct continuing studies addressed to developing a better coordinated and more unified system of environmental and land-use permits in the coastal area, and shall report its recommendations thereon from time to time to the General Assembly.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, ss. 4, 5; 1979, c. 299; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, ss. 125, 142; 1997-443, s. 11A.122; 2002-165, s. 2.16.
Editor’s Note.
Section 104B-4, referred to in subsection (c) of this section, G.S. 143-215.99 and Chapter 130 have all been repealed. For provisions relating to the public health, see now Chapter 130A.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
§ 113A-126. Injunctive relief and penalties.
- Upon violation of any of the provisions of this Article or of any rule or order adopted under the authority of this Article the Secretary may, either before or after the institution of proceedings for the collection of any penalty imposed by this Article for such violation, institute a civil action in the General Court of Justice in the name of the State upon the relation of the Secretary for injunctive relief to restrain the violation and for a preliminary and permanent mandatory injunction to restore the resources consistent with this Article and rules of the Commission. If the court finds that a violation is threatened or has occurred, the court shall, at a minimum, order the relief necessary to prevent the threatened violation or to abate the violation consistent with this Article and rules of the Commission. Neither the institution of the action nor any of the proceedings thereon shall relieve any party to such proceedings from any penalty prescribed by this Article for any violation of same.
- Upon violation of any of the provisions of this Article relating to permits for minor developments issued by a local government, or of any rule or order adopted under the authority of this Article relating to such permits, the designated local official may, either before or after the institution of proceedings for the collection of any penalty imposed by this Article for such violation, institute a civil action in the General Court of Justice in the name of the affected local government upon the relation of the designated local official for injunctive relief to restrain the violation and for a preliminary and permanent mandatory injunction to restore the resources consistent with this Article and rules of the Commission. If the court finds that a violation is threatened or has occurred, the court shall, at a minimum, order the relief necessary to prevent the threatened violation or to abate the violation consistent with this Article and rules of the Commission. Neither the institution of the action nor any of the proceedings thereon shall relieve any party to such proceedings from any penalty prescribed by this Article for any violation of same.
- Any person who shall be adjudged to have knowingly or willfully violated any provision of this Article, or any rule or order adopted pursuant to this Article, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. In addition, if any person continues to violate or further violates, any such provision, rule or order after written notice from the Secretary or (in the case of a permit for a minor development issued by a local government) written notice from the designated local official, the court may determine that each day during which the violation continues or is repeated constitutes a separate violation subject to the foregoing penalties.
-
-
A civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for a minor development violation and ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a major development violation may be assessed by the Commission against any person who:
- Is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 113A-118 , or who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of such permit.
- Fails to file, submit, or make available, as the case may be, any documents, data or reports required by the Commission pursuant to this Article.
- Refuses access to the Commission or its duly designated representative, who has sufficiently identified himself by displaying official credentials, to any premises, not including any occupied dwelling house or curtilage, for the purpose of conducting any investigations provided for in this Article.
- Violates a rule of the Commission implementing this Article.
- For each willful action or failure to act for which a penalty may be assessed under this subsection, the Commission may consider each day the action or inaction continues after notice is given of the violation as a separate violation; a separate penalty may be assessed for each such separate violation.
- The Commission shall notify a person who is assessed a penalty or investigative costs by registered or certified mail. The notice shall state the reasons for the penalty. A person may contest the assessment of a penalty or investigative costs by filing a petition for a contested case under G.S. 150B-23 within 20 days after receiving the notice of assessment. If a person fails to pay any civil penalty or investigative cost assessed under this subsection, the Commission shall refer the matter to the Attorney General for collection. An action to collect a penalty must be filed within three years after the date the final decision was served on the violator.
-
In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the Commission shall consider the following factors:
- The degree and extent of harm, including, but not limited to, harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
- The duration and gravity of the violation;
- The effect on water quality, coastal resources, or public trust uses;
- The cost of rectifying the damage;
- The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
- Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
- The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Commission has regulatory authority; and
- The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. (4a) The Commission may also assess a person who is assessed a civil penalty under this subsection the reasonable costs of any investigation, inspection, or monitoring that results in the assessment of the civil penalty. For a minor development violation, the amount of an assessment of investigative costs shall not exceed one-half of the amount of the civil penalty assessed or one thousand dollars ($1,000), whichever is less. For a major development violation, the amount of an assessment of investigative costs shall not exceed one-half of the amount of the civil penalty assessed or two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), whichever is less.
- The clear proceeds of penalties assessed pursuant to this subsection shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2 .
-
A civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for a minor development violation and ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a major development violation may be assessed by the Commission against any person who:
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1983, c. 485, ss. 1-3; c. 518, s. 6; 1987, c. 827, ss. 11, 143; 1991, c. 725, s. 6; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 839, s. 3; c. 890, s. 8; 1993, c. 539, s. 874; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1998-215, s. 53(a); 2006-229, s. 1; 2011-398, s. 38.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2006-229, s. 1, effective December 1, 2006, and applicable to violations and offenses committed on or after that date, in the introductory paragraph of subdivision (d)(1), substituted “one thousand dollars ($1,000)” for “two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00)” near the beginning, and substituted “ten thousand dollars ($10,000)” for “two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500)” near the middle; in subdivision (d)(3), deleted the former first sentence which read: “The Commission may assess the penalties provided for in this subsection.” and inserted “or investigative costs” in the the middle of the first sentence, in the second sentence, inserted “the assessment of,” and inserted “or investigative costs,” and in the third sentence, substituted “any civil penalty or investigative cost assessed under this subsection” for “a penalty”; rewrote subdivision (d)(4); and added subdivision (d)(4a).
Session Laws 2011-398, s. 38, effective January 1, 2012, and applicable to contested cases commenced on or after that date, deleted “agency” preceding “decision” in the last sentence of subdivision (d)(3).
Legal Periodicals.
For note, “The Forty-Two Hundred Dollar Question: ‘May State Agencies Have Discretion in Setting Civil Penalties Under the North Carolina Constitution?’,” see 68 N.C.L. Rev. 1035 (1990).
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
CASE NOTES
Legislative Intent. —
In enacting the 1992 amendment, the legislature intended to clarify, not change, the meaning of subsection (a) of this section. State ex rel. Cobey v. Simpson, 333 N.C. 81 , 423 S.E.2d 759, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 666 (1992).
Trial Court Without Jurisdiction. —
The trial court was without jurisdiction in a declaratory judgment action to pass upon the question of whether subdivision (d)(1)c of this section authorizes warrantless searches in violation of U.S. Const., Amend. XIV where the plaintiffs did not allege that they had been subject to actual searches or that they had been fined for refusing access to investigators. Adams v. North Carolina Dep't of Natural & Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683 , 249 S.E.2d 402, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1126 (1978).
Violation Held Willful. —
Evidence was sufficient to support Commission’s finding that unlawful filling of estuarine waters for 19 days after deadline prescribed in Division of Coastal Management Notice of Violation constituted a willful violation of this Article where, among other things, violator received a certified letter notifying him of the violation at least a month prior to the deadline, only partial work on a dam had been completed five days after the deadline, and a final working dam was not in place until 21 days after the deadline. In re Coastal Resources Comm'n, 96 N.C. App. 468, 386 S.E.2d 92, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 1033 (1989).
§ 113A-127. Coordination with the federal government.
All State agencies shall keep informed of federal and interstate agency plans, activities, and procedures within their area of expertise that affect the coastal area. Where federal or interstate agency plans, activities or procedures conflict with State policies, all reasonable steps shall be taken by the State to preserve the integrity of its policies.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1.
§ 113A-128. Protection of landowners’ rights.
Nothing in this Article authorizes any governmental agency to adopt a rule or issue any order that constitutes a taking of property in violation of the Constitution of this State or of the United States.
History. 1973, c. 1284, s. 1; 1975, c. 452, s. 5; 1981, c. 932, s. 2.1; 1987, c. 827, s. 144.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “The Pearl in the Oyster: The Public Trust Doctrine in North Carolina,” see 12 Campbell L. Rev. 23 (1989).
CASE NOTES
No Constitutional Right to Erosion Control. —
Plaintiffs’ claims that hardened structure rules, promulgated by defendants, effected a taking of property without just compensation and violated this section were properly dismissed, because plaintiffs failed to cite any persuasive authority for the proposition that a littoral or riparian landowner has a right to erect hardened structures in statutorily designated areas of environmental concern to protect their property from erosion or migration. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. Tomlinson, 134 N.C. App. 217, 517 S.E.2d 406, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 751 (1999).
§ 113A-129.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Part 5. Coastal Reserves.
§ 113A-129.1. Legislative findings and purposes.
- Findings. — It is hereby determined and declared as a matter of legislative finding that the coastal area of North Carolina contains a number of important undeveloped natural areas. These areas are vital to continued fishery and wildlife protection, water quality maintenance and improvement, preservation of unique and important coastal natural areas, aesthetic enjoyment, and public trust rights such as hunting, fishing, navigation, and recreation. Such land and water areas are necessary for the preservation of estuarine areas of the State, constitute important research facilities, and provide public access to waters of the State.
- Purposes. — Important public purposes will be served by the preservation of certain of these areas in an undeveloped state. Such areas would thereafter be available for research, education, and other consistent public uses. These areas would also continue to contribute perpetually to the natural productivity and biological, economic, and aesthetic values of North Carolina’s coastal area.
History. 1989, c. 344, s. 1.
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
CASE NOTES
Public Trust Rights. —
The legislature recognized public trust rights in its legislative finding that the undeveloped natural areas on the North Carolina coast are vital to . . . public trust rights such as hunting, fishing, navigation and recreation. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Public Uses. —
The term “other public uses” means uses in the nature of public trust rights, such as those enumerated in this section and G.S. 113A-129.2(e), thus, the placement of nine wells, together with associated underground utilities and access roads, is not a use in the nature of public trust rights and is prohibited by G.S. 113A-129.2(e). Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Recreational Activities. —
Like research and education, hunting, fishing, navigation, and recreation are activities which preserve the land in an undeveloped and natural state; these activities require only a temporary presence on the reserve and do not necessitate alteration of the undeveloped and natural state, they are recreational activities enjoyed by individuals, thus the impact of these activities on the natural resources of the area is minimal. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
§ 113A-129.2. Coastal Reserve Program.
- There is hereby created a North Carolina Coastal Reserve System for the purpose of acquiring, improving, and maintaining undeveloped coastal land and water areas in a natural state.
- This system shall be established and administered by the Department of Environmental Quality. In so doing the Department shall consult with and seek the ongoing advice of the Coastal Resources Commission. The Department may by rule define the areas to be included in this system and set standards for its use.
- This system shall be established within the coastal area as defined by G.S. 113A-103(2).
- All acquisitions or dispositions of property for lands within this system shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes.
- All lands and waters within the system shall be used primarily for research and education. Other public uses, such as hunting, fishing, navigation, and recreation, shall be allowed to the extent consistent with these primary uses. Improvements and alterations to the lands shall be limited to those consistent with these uses.
History. 1989, c. 344, s. 1; c. 727, s. 218(58); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (b).
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
The purpose of subsection (e) of this section, as gleaned from G.S. 113A-129.1 and subsection (a) of this section, is to preserve, improve, and maintain undeveloped coastal land and water areas in an undeveloped and natural state so that these areas can serve important public purposes; the primary public purpose or use served by the preservation of these areas in an undeveloped state is research and education. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Public Use. —
Like research and education, hunting, fishing, navigation, and recreation are activities which preserve the land in an undeveloped and natural state; these activities require only a temporary presence on the reserve and do not necessitate alteration of the undeveloped and natural state, they are recreational activities enjoyed by individuals, thus the impact of these activities on the natural resources of the area is minimal. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
Other Public Uses. —
The term “other public uses” means uses in the nature of public trust rights, such as those enumerated in subsection (e) and G.S. 113A-129.1(a), thus, the placement of nine wells, together with associated underground utilities and access roads, is not a use in the nature of public trust rights and is prohibited by this section. Friends of Hatteras Island Nat'l Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Comm'n, 117 N.C. App. 556, 452 S.E.2d 337, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 14 (1995).
§ 113A-129.3. Coordination.
- To the extent feasible, this system shall be carried out in coordination with the National Estuarine Reserve Research System established by 16 U.S.C. § 1461.
- To the extent feasible, lands and waters within this system shall be dedicated as components of the “State Nature and Historic Preserve” as provided in Article XIV, Section 5, of the Constitution and as nature reserves pursuant to G.S. 143B-135.250 to G.S. 143B-135.270.
History. 1989, c. 344, s. 1; c. 770, s. 47; 2019-241, s. 4.
Editor’s Note.
“G.S. 143B-135.250 to G.S. 143B-135.270” was substituted for “G.S. 113A-164.1 to G.S. 113A-164.11 ” in subsection (b) at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes to conform to the recodification by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2019-241, s. 4, effective November 6, 2019, substituted “G.S. 143B-135.250 to G.S. 143B-135.270” for “G.S. 113A-164.1 to G.S. 113A-164.11 ” in subsection (b).
§§ 113A-130 through 113A-134.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Part 6. Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program.
§ 113A-134.1. Legislative findings.
- The General Assembly finds that there are many privately owned lots or tracts of land in close proximity to the Atlantic Ocean and the coastal waters in North Carolina that have been and will be adversely affected by hazards such as erosion, flooding, and storm damage. The sand dunes on many of these lots provide valuable protective functions for public and private property and serve as an integral part of the beach sand supply system. Placement of permanent substantial structures on these lots will lead to increased risks of loss of life and property, increased public costs, and potential eventual encroachment of structures onto the beach.
- The public has traditionally fully enjoyed the State’s beaches and coastal waters and public access to and use of the beaches and coastal waters. The beaches provide a recreational resource of great importance to North Carolina and its citizens and this makes a significant contribution to the economic well-being of the State. The General Assembly finds that the beaches and coastal waters are resources of statewide significance and have been customarily freely used and enjoyed by people throughout the State. Public access to beaches and coastal waters in North Carolina is, however, becoming severely limited in some areas. Also, the lack of public parking is increasingly making the use of existing public access difficult or impractical in some areas. The public interest would best be served by providing increased access to beaches and coastal waters and by making available additional public parking facilities. There is therefore, a pressing need in North Carolina to establish a comprehensive program for the identification, acquisition, improvement, and maintenance of public accessways to the beaches and coastal waters.
History. 1981, c. 925, s. 1; 1983, c. 751, s. 13; 1989, c. 344; s. 2; 1995, c. 183, s. 2.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 1989, c. 344, s. 2, effective June 19, 1989, redesignated former Article 7A of Chapter 113A, G.S. 113A-134.1 to 113A-134.3, as Part 6 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A.
Legal Periodicals.
For comment, “Sunbathers Versus Property Owners: Public Access to North Carolina Beaches,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 159 (1985).
For article, “Coastal Management Law in North Carolina: 1974-1994,” see 72 N.C.L. Rev. 1413 (1994).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
CASE NOTES
Taking. —
Because property owners had no right to exclude the public from public trust beaches, those portions of a town’s ordinances regulating beach driving, even if construed as ordinances “allowing” beach driving, could not effectuate a Fifth Amendment taking; the right to prevent the public from enjoying the dry sand portion of the property was never part of the “bundle of rights” purchased by the owners. Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle, 244 N.C. App. 81, 780 S.E.2d 187, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 958 (2015), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 75, 199 L. Ed. 2d 184, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4978 (2017).
Ocean Beaches. —
“Ocean beaches” of North Carolina include both the wet sand beaches, generally, but not exclusively, publicly owned, and the dry sand beaches, generally, but not exclusively, privately owned; the ocean beaches of North Carolina are subject to public trust rights unless those rights have been expressly abandoned by the State. Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle, 244 N.C. App. 81, 780 S.E.2d 187, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 958 (2015), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 75, 199 L. Ed. 2d 184, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4978 (2017).
§ 113A-134.2. Creation of program; administration; purpose; definitions.
- There is created the Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program, to be administered by the Commission and the Department, for the purpose of acquiring, improving, and maintaining property along the Atlantic Ocean and coastal waterways to which the public has rights-of-access or public trust rights as provided in this Part.
-
As used in this Part:
- “Public trust resources” has the same meaning as in G.S. 113-131(e) .
- “Public trust rights” has the same meaning as in G.S. 1-45.1 .
History. 1981, c. 925, s. 1; 1983, c. 757, s. 13; 1989, c. 344, s. 2; c. 727, s. 136; c. 751, s. 13; 1995, c. 183, s. 3.
CASE NOTES
Ocean Beaches. —
“Ocean beaches” of North Carolina include both the wet sand beaches, generally, but not exclusively, publicly owned, and the dry sand beaches, generally, but not exclusively, privately owned; the ocean beaches of North Carolina are subject to public trust rights unless those rights have been expressly abandoned by the State. Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle, 244 N.C. App. 81, 780 S.E.2d 187, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 958 (2015), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 75, 199 L. Ed. 2d 184, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4978 (2017).
§ 113A-134.3. Standards for public access program.
- The Commission, with the support of the Department, shall establish and carry out a program to assure the acquisition, improvement, and maintenance of a system of public access to coastal beaches and public trust waters. This public access program shall include standards to be adopted by the Commission for the acquisition of property and the use and maintenance of the property. The standards shall be written to assure that land acquisition funds shall only be used to purchase interests in property that will be of benefit to the general public. Priority shall be given to acquisition of lands that due to adverse effects of natural hazards, such as past and potential erosion, flooding, and storm damage, are unsuitable for the placement of permanent structures, including lands for which a permit for improvements has been denied under rules adopted pursuant to State law. The program shall be designed to provide and maintain reasonable public access and necessary parking, within the limitations of the resources available, to all coastal beaches and public trust waters where access is compatible with the natural resources involved and where reasonable access is not available.
- To the maximum extent possible, this program shall be coordinated with State and local beach and coastal water management and recreational programs and shall be carried out in cooperation with local governments. Prior to the purchase of any interests in property, the Secretary or his designee shall make a written finding of the public purpose to be served by the acquisition. Once property is purchased, the Department may allow property, without charge, to be controlled and operated by the county or municipality in which the property is located, subject to an agreement requiring that the local government use and maintain the property for its intended public purpose.
-
Subject to any restrictions imposed by law, any funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program (Program) may be used to meet matching requirements for federal or other funds. The Department shall make every effort to obtain funds from sources other than the General Fund to implement this program. Funds may be used to acquire or develop land for pedestrian access including parking and to make grants to local governments to accomplish the purposes of this Part. All acquisitions or dispositions of property made pursuant to this Part shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes. All grants to local governments pursuant to this Part for land acquisitions shall be made on the following conditions:
- The local government agrees to dedicate acquired lands in perpetuity for public access and for the benefit of the general public. The dedication shall be recorded in the office of the register of deeds in the county where the dedicated lands are located.
- If Program grant funds are used to acquire a lease or easement, the lease or easement agreement shall have a minimum term of 25 years.
- If the local government uses the property for a purpose other than beach or coastal waters access or elects to sell or otherwise dispose of the property, the local government shall reimburse the State an amount that is the greater of (i) the amount of Program grant funds provided to purchase the property or (ii) an amount equal to the same proportion of the current market value of the property as the proportion of the original purchase price of the property funded with Program grant funds.
History. 1981, c. 925, s. 1; 1983, c. 334; c. 757, s. 13; 1987, c. 827, s. 145; 1989, c. 344, s. 2; c. 727, s. 137; c. 751, s. 13; 1995, c. 183, s. 4; 2021-158, s. 1.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 1995, c. 183, s. 4, amended this section by adding subsection (b) and (c) designations, but failed to add a subsection (a) designation; the subsection (a) designation was added at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2021-158, s. 1, effective September 16, 2021, rewrote subsection (c).
Legal Periodicals.
For comment, “Sunbathers Versus Property Owners: Public Access to North Carolina Beaches,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 159 (1985).
For article, “The Pearl in the Oyster: The Public Trust Doctrine in North Carolina,” see 12 Campbell L. Rev. 23 (1989).
§§ 113A-134.4 through 113A-134.9.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 7A. [Redesignated.]
Editor’s Note.
Article 7A of Chapter 113A, consisting of G.S. 113A-134.1 to 113A-134.3, was redesignated as Part 6 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A by Session Laws 1989, c. 344, s. 2, effective June 19, 1989.
Article 7B. Bogue Inlet Access Program. [Repealed]
§ 113A-134.10. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1991, c. 365, s. 1.
Article 7C. Beach Management Plan.
§ 113A-134.11. Department to compile and evaluate information.
The Department of Environmental Quality shall compile and evaluate information on the current conditions and erosion rates of beaches, on coastal geology, and on storm and erosion hazards for use in developing a State plan and strategy for beach management and restoration. The Department of Environmental Quality shall make this information available to local governments for use in land-use planning.
History. 2000-67, s. 13.9(b); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Beach Nourishment Studies.
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 14.22(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The Division of Coastal Management and the Department of Environmental Quality shall study and provide an executive summary of readily available data and existing studies on the physical and economic, storm mitigation, and public safety benefits of out-of-state coastal storm damage reduction and beach nourishment projects. Specific items benefitted by coastal storm damage reduction shall include, at a minimum, public infrastructure, public property, private property, small businesses, and tourism. The results of the study shall be reported no later than November 1, 2016, to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(b) The County Tax Office of each covered county shall work together to identify all privately and publicly owned property island-wide in the county. A covered county includes the Counties of Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Onslow, Carteret, Hyde, Dare, and Currituck. Each County Tax Office shall determine whether the mailing/ownership address on the tax record of such property is (i) in the county where such property is located, (ii) in a noncovered county in North Carolina, or (iii) outside the State of North Carolina. Each County Tax Office shall send an electronic list of the property addresses and matched mailing/ownership addresses suitable for electronic sorting no later than November 1, 2016, to the Department of Environmental Quality and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(c) The Department of Commerce shall study and provide an executive summary of readily available economic data related to the 20 coastal counties of the State for the purpose of quantifying the contribution of the coastal economy to the economy of the State as a whole, considering, at a minimum, the benefits of travel and tourism, small businesses, job creation and opportunity, and tax revenues, including property, sales, and income taxes. The Department shall report the results of the study no later than November 1, 2016, to the Department of Environmental Quality and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources.
“(d) The Department of Environmental Quality shall include the studies required by each subsection of this section as appendices to the Beach and Inlet Management Plan required by Section 14.6(b)(4) of S.L. 2015-241.”
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 13.9 was codified as Chapter 113A, Article 7C, with s. 13.9(b) codified as G.S. 113A-134.11 , and ss. 13.9(c) and 13.9(d) codified as G.S. 113A-134.12 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2000’.”
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 13.9 (a), provides: “The General Assembly makes the following findings:
“(1) North Carolina has 320 miles of ocean beach, including some of the most pristine and attractive beaches in the country.
“(2) The balance between economic development and quality of life in North Carolina has made our coast one of the most desirable along the Atlantic Seaboard.
“(3) North Carolina’s beaches are vital to the State’s tourism industry.
“(4) North Carolina’s beaches belong to all the State’s citizens and provide recreational and economic benefits to our residents statewide.
“(5) Beach erosion can threaten the economic viability of coastal communities and can significantly affect State tax revenues.
“(6) The Atlantic Seaboard is vulnerable to hurricanes and other storms, and it is prudent to take precautions such as beach nourishment that protect and conserve the State’s beaches and reduce property damage and flooding.
“(7) Beach renourishment as an erosion control method provides hurricane flood protection, enhances the attractiveness of beaches to tourists, restores habitat for turtles, shorebirds, and plants, and provides additional public access to beaches.
“(8) Federal policy previously favored and assisted voluntary movement of structures threatened by erosion, but this assistance is no longer available.
“(9) Relocation of structures threatened by erosion is sometimes the best available remedy for the property owner and is in the public interest.
“(10) Public parking and public access areas are needed for use by the general public to enable their enjoyment of North Carolina’s beaches.
“(11) Acquisition of high erosion hazard property by local or State agencies can reduce risk to citizens and property, reduce costs to insurance policyholders, improve public access to beaches and waterways, and protect the environment.
“(12) Beach nourishment projects such as those at Wrightsville Beach and Carolina Beach have been very successful and greatly reduced property damage during Hurricane Fran.
“(13) Because local beach communities derive the primary benefits from the presence of adequate beaches, a program of beach management and restoration should not be accomplished without a commitment of local funds to combat the problem of beach erosion.
“(14) The State of North Carolina prohibits seawalls and hardening the shoreline to prevent destroying the public’s beaches.
“(15) Beach nourishment is encouraged by both the Coastal Resources Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a method to control beach erosion.
“(16) The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has statutory authority to assist local governments in financing beach nourishment projects and is the sponsor of several federal navigation projects that result in dredging beach-quality sand.
“(17) It is declared to be a necessary governmental responsibility to properly manage and protect North Carolina’s beaches from erosion and that good planning is needed to assure a cost-effective and equitable approach to beach management and restoration, and that as part of a comprehensive response to beach erosion, sound policies are needed to facilitate the ability of landowners to move threatened structures and to allow public acquisition of appropriate parcels of land for public beach access.”
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 13.9(f) provides that in the event that federal funds become available for planning and developing shore protection projects, the State shall match those funds in accordance with the funding guidelines set out in G.S. 143-215.71 .
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 28.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2000-2001 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2000-2001 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2000-67, s. 28.4, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2016.’ ”
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2016-2017 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2016-2017 fiscal year.”
Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.9(b), as amended by Session Laws 2018-138, s. 2.9, and as amended by Session Laws 2019-75, s. 3, provides: “On or before October 1, 2019, the recipients of allocations under this section shall submit a report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Agriculture and Natural and Economic Resources and the Fiscal Research Division. The report shall contain at least all of the following:
“(1) A list of participating local governments and engineering firms and other partners in projects funded under this section.
“(2) A list of projects funded, including a summary of the costs and the scope of the project.
“(3) Documentation of the impact on the resilience of beach nourishment projects.”
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” twice in the section.
§ 113A-134.12. Multiyear beach management and restoration strategy and plan.
-
The Department of Environmental Quality shall develop a multiyear beach management and restoration strategy and plan that does all of the following:
- Utilizes the data and expertise available in the Divisions of Water Resources, Coastal Management, and Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources.
- Identifies the erosion rate at each beach community and estimates the degree of vulnerability to storm and hurricane damage.
- Uses the best available geological and geographical information to determine the need for and probable effectiveness of beach nourishment.
- Provides for coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management, and other State and federal agencies concerned with beach management issues.
- Provides a status report on all U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ beach protection projects in the planning, construction, or operational stages.
- Makes maximum feasible use of suitable sand dredged from navigation channels for beach nourishment to avoid the loss of this resource and to reduce equipment mobilization costs.
- Promotes inlet sand bypassing where needed to replicate the natural flow of sand interrupted by inlets.
- Provides for geological and environmental assessments to locate suitable materials for beach nourishment.
- Considers the regional context of beach communities to determine the most cost-effective approach to beach nourishment.
- Provides for and requires adequate public beach access, including access for individuals with a disability.
- Recommends priorities for State funding for beach nourishment projects, based on the amount of erosion occurring, the potential damage to property and to the economy, the benefits for recreation and tourism, the adequacy of public access, the availability of local government matching funds, the status of project planning, the adequacy of project engineering, the cost-effectiveness of the project, and the environmental impacts.
- Includes recommendations on obtaining the maximum available federal financial assistance for beach nourishment.
- Is subject to a public hearing to receive citizen input.
- Each plan shall be as complete as resources and available information allow.
History. 2000-67, s. 13.9(c), (d); 2012-143, s. 1(f); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u); 2017-10, s. 4.9; 2018-142, s. 15.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2000-67, ss. 13.9(c) and (d), were codified as G.S. 113A-134.12 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes shall make the conforming statutory changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section. The Codifier of Rules shall make the conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the renaming of the Division of Land Resources as the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources as provided in subsection (e) of this section.”
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 5.1, is a severability clause.
The amendment by Session Laws 2017-10, s. 4.9, failed to take into account the amendment by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), which changed the name of the department. The words “Environmental Quality” have been set out in subsection (b) at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2012-143, s. 1(f), effective August 1, 2012, substituted “Divisions of Water Resources, Coastal Management, and Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources” for “Divisions of Water Resources, Coastal Management, and Land Resources” in subdivision (a)(1).
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” twice in the section.
Session Laws 2017-10, s. 4.9, effective May 4, 2017, deleted the former last two sentences of subsection (b), which read: “The Department of Environmental Quality shall revise the plan every two years and shall submit the revised plan to the General Assembly no later than March 1 of each odd-numbered year. The Department may issue a supplement to the plan in even-numbered years if significant new information becomes available.”
Session Laws 2018-142, s. 15, effective December 15, 2018, in subdivision (a)(10), substituted “access for individuals with a disability” for “handicapped access” following “beach access, including”; and in subsection (b), deleted “Environmental Quality” following “information allow.”
Article 8. North Carolina Land Conservancy Corporation. [Repealed]
§§ 113A-135 through 113A-149. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1983 (Regular Session, 1984), c. 995, s. 4.
Article 9. Land Policy Act.
§ 113A-150. Short title.
This Article shall be known as the Land Policy Act of 1974.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1.
Legal Periodicals.
For an article on statutory easements by necessity or cartways, see 75 N.C.L. Rev. 1943 (1997).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
§ 113A-151. Findings, intent and purpose.
-
Findings. — The General Assembly hereby finds that:
- The land of North Carolina is a resource basic to the welfare of her people.
- A lack of coordination of governmental action; a lack of clearly stated, sound, and widely understood guidelines for planning; and a lack of systematic collection, classification, and utilization of information regarding the land resource have led to inconsistencies in policy and inadequacies in planning for the present and future uses of the land resource.
- Governmental agencies responsible for controlling land use and private and public users of the land resource are often unable to independently develop guidelines for land-use practices which provide adequate and meaningful provision for future demands on the land resource, while allowing current needs to be met.
- Systematic and sound decisions as to the location and nature of major public investments in key facilities cannot be made without a comprehensive State policy regarding the land resource.
- Those affected by State land-use policy and decisions must be given an opportunity for full participation in the policy- and decision-making process. Such a process must allow for the final implementation of policy by local governments. The State should take whatever steps necessary to encourage and assist local governments in meeting their obligation to control current uses and plan for future uses of the land resource.
-
Intent and Purpose. — The General Assembly declares that it is the intent of this Article to undertake the continuing development and implementation of a State land-use policy, incorporating environmental, esthetic, economic, social, and other factors so as to promote the public interest, to preserve and enhance environmental quality, to protect areas of natural beauty and historic sites, to encourage beneficial economic development, and to protect and promote the public health, safety, and welfare. Such policy shall serve as a guide for decision-making in State and federally assisted programs which affect land use, and shall provide a framework for the development of land-use policies and programs by local governments. It is the purpose of this Article to:
- Promote patterns of land use which are in accord with a State land-use policy which encourages the wise and balanced use of the State’s resources;
- Establish a State policy to give local governments guidance and assistance in the establishment and implementation of local land planning and management programs so as to effectively meet their responsibilities for economically and environmentally sound land-use management;
- Establish a State land-use policy which seeks to provide essential public services equitably to all persons within the State and to assure that citizens shall have, consistent with sound principles of land resource use, maximum freedom and opportunity to live and conduct their activities in locations of their personal choice;
- Condition the distribution of certain federal and State funds on meeting reasonable and flexible State requirements for basic land planning; such conditions to include a clear statement of the State’s authority and responsibility for review of planning and management by local governments;
- Develop and maintain coordination of all State programs having a land-use impact, including joint planning and management of State lands with adjacent nonstate lands, so as to ensure consistency with the purposes of this Article;
- Promote the development of systematic methods for the exchange of land-use, environmental, economic, and social information among all levels of government, and among agencies at all levels of government.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1.
Legal Periodicals.
For an article on statutory easements by necessity or cartways, see 75 N.C.L. Rev. 1943 (1997).
§ 113A-152. Definitions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms as used in this Article are defined as follows:
- “Areas of environmental concern” means: those areas of this State where uncontrolled development, unregulated use, or other man-related activities could result in major or irreversible damage to important environmental, historic, cultural, scientific or scenic values, or natural systems or processes which are of more than local significance, or could unreasonably endanger life or property as a result of natural hazards, or could result in loss of continued long-range productivity in renewable resource areas.
- “Principal officer” means the duly appointed or elected public official in responsible charge of a principal department of State government.
- “Key facilities” means public facilities which tend to induce development and urbanization of more than local impact and includes, but is not limited to, major facilities for the development, generation, and transmission of energy, for communication, and for transportation.
- “Local government” means any county, incorporated village, town, or city, or any combination of counties, incorporated villages, towns, and cities, acting through a joint program pursuant to the provisions of this Article.
- “New communities and large-scale developments” means private development which, because of its magnitude or the magnitude of its effect on the surrounding environment, is likely to present issues of more than local significance.
- “Project of regional impact” means land use, public development, and private development on government or nongovernmental lands for which there is a demonstrable impact affecting the interests of constituents of more than one local unit of government.
- “Region” or “regional” means or refers to one or more of the official planning regions established pursuant to the laws of this State.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1.
§ 113A-153. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2015-264, s. 15, effective October 1, 2015.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1; 1977, c. 771, ss. 4, 15; 1979, c. 44, s. 1; 1981, c. 47, s. 1; c. 881, s. 3; 1987, c. 827, s. 146; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(67); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2011-284, s. 75; 2015-241, s. 14.30(u); repealed by 2015-264, s. 15, effective October 1, 2015.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-153 pertained to the North Carolina Land Policy Council.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2011-284, s. 75, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “devises” for “bequests” in the second sentence of subsection (e).
§ 113A-154. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1981, c. 881, s. 3.
§ 113A-155. State land policy.
-
Content. — The State land policy of North Carolina shall consist of the following:
- Consistent, comprehensive, and coordinated principles, guidelines, and methods for the transaction of all matters and affairs by any agency of State or local government dealing with, or related to, the acquisition, ownership, use, management, and disposition, in part or whole, of title or interests in state-owned and other public lands;
- A compilation of all appropriate State laws, appellate court decisions, and current administrative practices, policies and principles, as established by precedent or administrative order, when accepted and recognized as such by the Land Policy Council; and
-
Principles, guidelines and methods regarding specific land-use and management problems identified by the Land Policy Council, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
- Specific policies and principles for early acquisition of a reserve of lands to form a resource base from which needs for parklands, recreation sites, water reservoirs, key facilities, and other public needs may be met.
- Specific policies and principles for the location, coordination, consolidation and joint use of utility rights-of-way, of whatever sort, whether above, below, or on the surface of the ground.
- Specific policies regarding large-scale and special public projects and assemblage of land therefor.
- Specific policies for determination and certification of areas of environmental concern.
- Specific policies regarding new communities and large-scale developments on nongovernment lands.
- Specific policies regarding projects of regional impact.
- Other similar and related policies and directives as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of this Article.
- Effect. — Such policies, principles, directives and methods, when not inconsistent or in conflict with existing law or rules, shall guide and determine the administrative procedures, findings, decisions and objectives of all agencies of State and local government with regard to acquisition, management, and disposition of public lands and interests therein and the regulation of private lands involved in or affected by areas of environmental concern, new communities, large-scale developments and projects of regional impact.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 147.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1; 1987, c. 827, s. 147.
§ 113A-156. State land classification system.
-
Purpose. — Within two years following July 1, 1974, the North Carolina Land Policy Council shall develop a State land classification system, which shall include comprehensive guidelines and policies and a method for the classification of all lands in the State for the purposes of:
- Providing to State and local governmental agencies a system for achieving the stated purposes of this Article.
- Promoting the orderly growth and development of the State in a manner consistent with the wise use and conservation of the land resources.
- Assuring that the use and development of land in areas of environmental concern within the State is not inconsistent with the State land policy.
- Assuring that the use of land for key facilities, new communities, and large-scale developments, or in areas which are or may be impacted by key facilities, new communities, and large-scale developments, is not inconsistent with the State land policy.
- Criteria for Classification. — The Council shall develop and adopt as a part of the classification system no fewer than four nor more than eight classifications which recognize all lands as a basic social and natural resource and which provide for the full range of private and public purposes in the use and conservation of the land resource. Emphasis shall be given to a harmonious relationship among the use potentials of the land, the physical and fiscal feasibility of providing necessary public services, and other facilities and social services. Areas of environmental concern, key facilities, projects of regional impact, new communities, and large-scale developments shall be recognized and made a part of the land classification system in order to further the stated purposes of this Article.
-
Basis for Land Classification. — Full consideration shall be given, but shall not be limited to, the following aspects and characteristics of the lands of the State:
- Topographic features such as land elevations and gradients.
- Surface and underground waters, natural or artificial.
- Geological, chemical, mineral and physical characteristics of the land.
- The existing or potential utility of lands and sites having intrinsic historic, ecological, recreational, scenic or esthetic values or virtues.
- The availability or potential availability of public services, including key facilities, health, education, and other community facilities and social services.
- Areas of environmental concern, existing or potential key facilities, projects of regional impact, new communities, and large-scale development.
-
Content. — The State land classification system shall include, but specifically is not limited to, the following:
- Concise and explicit descriptions of each of the classification categories.
- Guidelines and procedures for the preparation of official land-use plans by the land-planning agencies of local government, including a procedure for review by an appropriate State agency for sufficiency and consistency with the provisions of this Article, and a procedure for assembling local plans into regional plans.
- Rules and procedures for land reclassification together with an appellate procedure for property owners and other affected individuals, including officers of any level of government.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 827, s. 148.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 1; 1987, c. 827, s. 148.
Legal Periodicals.
For article discussing a practical interpretation of North Carolina’s comprehensive plan requirement for zoning regulations, see 7 Campbell L. Rev. 1 (1984).
§ 113A-157. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1981, c. 881, s. 3.
§ 113A-158. Protection of rights.
Nothing in this Article authorizes any governmental agency to adopt a rule or issue any order that constitutes a taking of property in violation of the Constitution of this State or of the United States, without payment of full compensation.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 5; 1987, c. 827, s. 144.
§ 113A-159. Interpretation.
It is the intention of the General Assembly that this Article be interpreted consistently with, and administered in coordination with, the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974.
History. 1973, c. 1306, s. 6.
§§ 113A-160 through 113A-164.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 9A. Nature Preserves Act. [Repealed]
§ 113A-164.1.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.250 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.2. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.252 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.3. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.254 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.4. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.256 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.5. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.258 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.6. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.260 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.7. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.262 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.8. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.264 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.9. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.266 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.10. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.268 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.11. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.270 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-164.12. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.272 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2), effective July 1, 2015.
Article 10. Control of Outdoor Advertising near the Blue Ridge Parkway.
§ 113A-165. Advertisements prohibited within 1,000 feet of centerline; exceptions.
No advertisement or advertising structure shall be erected, constructed, installed, maintained or operated within 1,000 feet of the centerline of the Blue Ridge Parkway, except the following:
- Sign displays or devices which advertise sale, lease, rental, or development of the property on which it is located.
- On-premises Signs. — For the purpose of this Article, those signs, displays or devices which carry only advertisements strictly related to the lawful use of the property on which it is located including signs, displays or devices which identify the business transacted, services rendered, goods sold or produced on the property, name of the business, [and] name of the person, firm or corporation occupying or owning the property. The size of signs advertising the major business activity is not regulated hereunder. Signs which advertise brand-name products or service sold or offered for sale on the property shall not be displayed as on-premise[s] signs unless such signs are on or attached to the building in which such products are sold. All such signs permitted under this subsection shall be located not more than 150 feet from the building in which such business activity is carried on.
- Historic markers erected by duly constituted and authorized public authorities.
- Highway markers and signs erected or caused to be erected by the Board of Transportation or other authorized authorities in accordance with the law.
- Directional and official signs or notices erected and maintained by public officers or agencies pursuant to and in accordance with lawful authorization for the purpose of carrying out the official duty or responsibility.
- Signs located within a 1,000-foot radius of intersections created by the crossing of the centerline of the Blue Ridge Parkway with the centerlines of components of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, Federal Aid Primary Highway System, or the North Carolina System of Primary Highways, not, however, inconsistent with other provisions of the General Statutes.
History. 1973, c. 507, s. 5; 1975, c. 385.
§ 113A-166. Rules.
The Secretary of Environmental Quality may adopt rules needed to implement this Article.
History. 1975, c. 385; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 149; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(69); 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1004, s. 19(b); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(v).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources.”
§ 113A-167. Existing billboards.
Any billboard in existence upon May 26, 1975, and which does not conform to the requirements of this Article may be maintained for the life of such advertisement or advertising structure, provided that: The Department of Environmental Quality is authorized to acquire by purchase, gift or condemnation all outdoor advertising and all property rights pertaining thereto existing on May 26, 1975, which are nonconforming.
- In any acquisition, purchase or condemnation, just compensation to the owner of the outdoor advertising where the owner of the outdoor advertising does not own the fee shall be limited to the fair market value at the time of the taking of the outdoor advertising owner’s interest in the real property on which the outdoor advertising is located and such value shall include the value of the outdoor advertising.
- In any acquisition, purchase or condemnation, just compensation to the owner of the fee or other interest in the real property upon which the outdoor advertising is located where said owner does not own the outdoor advertising located thereon shall be limited to the difference in the fair market value of the entire tract immediately before and immediately after the taking by the Commission of the right to erect and maintain such outdoor advertising thereon, and in arriving at the fair market value after the taking, any special or general benefits accruing to the property by reason of the acquisition shall be taken into consideration.
- In any acquisition, purchase or condemnation, just compensation to the owner of the fee in the real property upon which the outdoor advertising is located where said owner also owns the outdoor advertising located thereon shall be limited to the fair market value of the outdoor advertising plus the difference in the fair market value of the entire tract immediately before and immediately after the taking by the Department of Environmental Quality of the right to erect and maintain such outdoor advertising thereon and in arriving at the fair market value after the taking, any special or general benefits accruing to the property by reason of the acquisition shall be taken into consideration.
History. 1975, c. 385; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(70); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in the introductory paragraph and subdivision (3).
§ 113A-168. Removal, etc., of unlawful advertising.
Any outdoor advertising erected or established after May 26, 1975, in violation of the provisions of this Article shall be unlawful and shall constitute a nuisance. The Department of Environmental Quality shall give 30 days’ notice by certified mail to the owner of the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure, if such owner is known or can by reasonable diligence be ascertained, to move the outdoor advertising structure or to make it conform to the provisions of this Article and rules and regulations promulgated by the Department of Environmental Quality hereunder. The Department or its agents shall have the right to remove or contract to have removed the nonconforming outdoor advertising at the expense of the said owner if the said owner fails to act within 30 days after receipt of such notice. The Department or its agents or contractor and his employees may enter upon private property for the purpose of removing outdoor advertising prohibited by this Article or its implementing rules without civil or criminal liability.
History. 1975, c. 385; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 150; 1989, c. 727, s. 138; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” twice in the second sentence.
§ 113A-169. Condemnation procedure.
For the purposes of this Article, the Department of Environmental Quality shall use the procedure for condemnation of property as provided for by Article 9 of Chapter 136 of the General Statutes.
History. 1975, c. 385; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(71); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources.”
§ 113A-170. Violation a misdemeanor; injunctive relief.
Any person, firm, corporation or association placing or erecting outdoor advertising structure or junkyard along the Blue Ridge Parkway in violation of this Article or a rule adopted under this Article shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. In addition thereto, the Department of Environmental Quality may seek injunctive relief in the superior court of the county in which the said nonconforming outdoor advertising is located and require the outdoor advertising to conform to the provisions of this Article or a rule adopted under this Article, or require the removal of the said nonconforming outdoor advertising.
History. 1975, c. 385; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 151; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(72); 1993, c. 539, s. 875; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources.”
§§ 113A-171 through 113A-175.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 11. Forest Development Act. [Repealed]
§§ 113A-176 through 113A-183.
Recodified as Article 83 of Chapter 106, G.S. 106-1010 through G.S. 106-1018 , by Session Laws 2011-145, s. 13.25(gg), effective July 1, 2011.
§§ 113A-184 through 113A-188.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 12. Primary Forest Product Assessment Act. [Repealed]
§§ 113A-189 through 13A-196.
Recodified as Article 84 of Chapter 106, G.S. 106-1025 through G.S. 106-1032 , by Session Laws 2011-145, s. 13.25(ii), effective July 1, 2011.
§§ 113A-197 through 113A-201.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 13. Toxic Substances Task Force and Incident Response Procedures. [Repealed]
§§ 113A-202 through 113A-204. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 1979, 2nd Session, c. 1310, s. 3.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-204 had been reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 14. Mountain Ridge Protection.
§ 113A-205. Short title.
This Article shall be known as the Mountain Ridge Protection Act of 1983.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
Legal Periodicals.
For article discussing the legislative history of the North Carolina Mountain Ridge Protection Act and analyzing its major provisions, see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 183 (1984).
For note on the regulatory impact of North Carolina’s ridge law, see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 197 (1984).
For comment, “Legal Analysis of the Constitutionality of the Water Supply Watershed Protection Act of 1989 and the Hyde Bill,” see 29 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1279 (1994).
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
§ 113A-206. Definitions.
Within the meaning of this Article:
- The word “person” includes any individual, partnership, firm, association, joint venture, public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative, interstate body, the State of North Carolina and its agencies and political subdivisions, or other legal entity.
- A person, as defined in this section, doing business or maintaining an office within a county is a resident of the county.
-
“Tall buildings or structures” include any building, structure or unit within a multiunit building with a vertical height of more than 40 feet measured from the top of the foundation of said building, structure or unit and the uppermost point of said building, structure or unit; provided, however, that where such foundation measured from the natural finished grade of the crest or the natural finished grade of the high side of the slope of a ridge exceeds 3 feet, then such measurement in excess of 3 feet shall be included in the 40-foot limitation described herein; provided, further, that no such building, structure or unit shall protrude at its uppermost point above the crest of the ridge by more than 35 feet. “Tall buildings or structures” do not include:
- Water, radio, telephone or television towers or any equipment for the transmission of electricity or communications or both.
- Structures of a relatively slender nature and minor vertical projections of a parent building, including chimneys, flagpoles, flues, spires, steeples, belfries, cupolas, antennas, poles, wires, or windmills.
- Buildings and structures designated as National Historic Sites on the National Archives Registry.
- “Construction” includes reconstruction, alteration, or expansion.
- “Ridge” means the elongated crest or series of crests at the apex or uppermost point of intersection between two opposite slopes or sides of a mountain, and includes all land within 100 feet below the elevation of any portion of such line or surface along the crest.
- “Protected mountain ridges” are all mountain ridges whose elevation is 3,000 feet and whose elevation is 500 or more feet above the elevation of an adjacent valley floor; provided, however, that a county, or a city with a population of fifty thousand (50,000) or more, may elect to eliminate the requirement for an elevation of 3,000 feet, and such election shall apply both to an ordinance adopted under G.S. 113A-208 and the prohibition against construction under G.S. 113A-209 ; provided, further, that such ordinance shall be adopted pursuant to the procedures of G.S. 113A-208 .
- “Crest” means the uppermost line of a mountain or chain of mountains from which the land falls away on at least two sides to a lower elevation or elevations.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1; 1985, c. 713, s. 1.
§ 113A-207. Legislative findings.
The construction of tall or major buildings and structures on the ridges and higher elevations of North Carolina’s mountains in an inappropriate or badly designed manner can cause unusual problems and hazards to the residents of and to visitors to the mountains. Supplying water to, and disposing of the sewage from, buildings at high elevations with significant numbers of residents may infringe on the ground water rights and endanger the health of those persons living at lower elevations. Providing fire protection may be difficult given the lack of water supply and pressure and the possibility that fire will be fanned by high winds. Extremes of weather can endanger buildings, structures, vehicles, and persons. Tall or major buildings and structures located on ridges are a hazard to air navigation and persons on the ground and detract from the natural beauty of the mountains.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
§ 113A-208. Regulation of mountain ridge construction by counties and cities.
- Any county or city may adopt, effective not later than January 1, 1984, and may enforce an ordinance that regulates the construction of tall buildings or structures on protected mountain ridges by any person. The ordinance may provide for the issuance of permits to construct tall buildings on protected mountain ridges, the conditioning of such permits, and the denial of permits for such construction. Any ordinance adopted hereunder shall be based upon studies of the mountain ridges within the county, a statement of objectives to be sought by the ordinance, and plans for achieving these objectives. Any such county ordinance shall apply countywide except as otherwise provided in Article 2 of Chapter 160D of the General Statutes and any such city ordinance shall apply citywide, to construction of tall buildings on protected mountain ridges within the city or county, as the case may be.A city with a population of 50,000 or more may adopt, prior to January 1, 1986, an ordinance eliminating the requirement for an elevation of 3,000 feet, as permitted by G.S. 113A-206(6) .
-
Under the ordinance, permits shall be denied if a permit application (and shall be revoked if a project) fails to provide for:
- Sewering that meets the requirements of a public wastewater disposal system that it discharges into, or that is part of a separate system that meets applicable State and federal standards;
- A water supply system that is adequate for fire protection, drinking water and other projected system needs; that meets the requirements of any public water supply system that it interconnects with; and that meets any applicable State standards, requirements and approvals;
- Compliance with applicable State and local sedimentation control regulations and requirements; and
- Adequate consideration to protecting the natural beauty of the mountains, as determined by the local governing board.
- Permits may be conditioned to insure proper operation, to avoid or mitigate any of the problems or hazards recited in the findings of G.S. 113A-207 , to protect natural areas or the public health, and to prevent badly designed, unsafe or inappropriate construction.
- An ordinance adopted under the authority of this section applies to all protected mountain ridges as defined in G.S. 113A-206 . A county or city may apply the ordinance to other mountain ridges within its jurisdiction if it finds that this application is reasonably necessary to protect against some or all of the hazards or problems set forth in G.S. 113A-207 . Additionally, a city with a population of 50,000 or more may apply the ordinance to other mountain ridges within its extraterritorial planning jurisdiction if it finds that this application is reasonably necessary to protect against some or all of the hazards or problems set forth in G.S. 113A-207 .
- Determinations by the county or city governing board of heights or elevations under this Article shall be conclusive in the absence of fraud. Any county or city that adopts a ridge ordinance under the authority of this section or other authority shall send a copy of the ordinance to the Secretary of Environmental Quality.
- Any county or city that adopts an ordinance pursuant to this section shall follow the procedures of Article 6 of Chapter 160D of the General Statutes.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.5(l), effective June 19, 2020.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1; 1985, c. 713, ss. 2, 4; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(78); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(v); 2019-111, s. 2.5(l); 2020-3, s. 4.33(a); 2020-25, s. 51(a), (b), (d).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.8, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 3.2, as amended by Session Laws 2020-3, s. 4.33(a), made the amendments of this section by Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.5( l ), effective August 1, 2021, and applicable to local government development regulation decisions made on or after that date, and further provided that: “Part II of this act clarifies and restates the intent of existing law and applies to ordinances adopted before, on, and after the effective date.” Session Laws 2020-25, s. 51(a), (b), and (d), effective June 19, 2020, repealed Session Laws 2019-111, s. 3.2, and Session Laws 2020-3, s. 4.33(a), and provides: “Part II of S.L. 2019-111 [which amended this section] is effective when this act becomes law [June 19, 2020]. Part II of S.L. 2019-111 clarifies and restates the intent of law existing on the effective date of this act [June 19, 2020] and applies to ordinances adopted before, on, and after that date. Valid local government development regulations that are in effect at the time of the effective date of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 remain in effect but local governments shall amend those regulations to conform to the provisions of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 on or before July 1, 2021. Part II of S.L. 2019-111 applies to local government development regulation decisions made on or after the earlier of:
“(1) The effective date of the amendments to local development regulations made to conform to the provisions of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 or
“(2) July 1, 2021.”
Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (e).
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.5( l ), substituted “Article 2 of Chapter 160D of the General Statutes” for “G.S. 160A-360” in the last sentence of the first paragraph of subsection (a); substituted “governing board” for “governing body” at the end of subdivision (b)(4); rewrote subsection (f); and deleted subsection (g), which read: “Any resident of a county or city that adopted an ordinance pursuant to this section, or of an adjoining county, may bring a civil action against the ordinance-adopting unit, contesting the ordinance as not meeting the requirements of this section. If the ordinance is found not to meet all of the requirements of this section, the county or city shall be enjoined from enforcing the ordinance and the provisions of G.S. 113A-209 shall apply. Nothing in this Article authorizes the State of North Carolina or any of its agencies to bring a civil action to contest an ordinance, or for a violation of this Article or of an ordinance adopted pursuant to this Article.”. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-209. Certain buildings prohibited.
- This section applies beginning January 1, 1984, in any county or city that has failed to adopt a ridge protection ordinance pursuant to G.S. 113A-208 by January 1, 1984.
- No county or city may authorize the construction of, and no person may construct, a tall building or structure on any protected mountain ridge.
- No county or city may authorize the providing of the following utility services to any building or structure constructed in violation of subsection (b) of this section: electricity, telephone, gas, water, sewer, or septic system.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
§ 113A-210. Application to existing buildings.
General Statutes 113A-208 and 113A-209 apply to buildings that existed upon the effective date of this Article as follows:
- No reconstruction, alteration or expansion may aggravate or intensify a violation by an existing building or structure that did not comply (a) with G.S. 113A-209 upon its effective date, or (b) with an ordinance adopted under G.S. 113A-208 upon its effective date.
- No reconstruction, alteration or expansion may cause or create a violation by an existing building or structure that did comply (a) with G.S. 113A-209 upon its effective date, or (b) with an ordinance adopted under G.S. 113A-208 upon its effective date.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
Editor’s Note.
The effective date of this Article, referred to in this section, is July 5, 1983. As to the applicability of G.S. 113A-208 and 113A-209, see those sections.
§ 113A-211. Enforcement and penalties.
- Violations of this Article shall be subject to the same criminal sanctions, civil penalties and equitable remedies as provided by G.S. 160D-404.
-
Any person injured by a violation of this Article or any person who resides in the county in which the violation occurred may bring a civil action against the person alleged to be in violation. The action may seek:
- Injunctive relief; or
- An order enforcing the provision violated; or
- Damages caused by the violation; or
- Both damages and injunctive relief; or
- Both damages and an enforcement order; or
-
Both an enforcement order and injunctive relief.
If actual damages as found by the court or jury in suits brought under this subsection are five hundred dollars ($500.00) or less, the plaintiff shall be awarded double the amount of actual damages; if the amount of actual damages as found by the court or jury is greater than five hundred dollars ($500.00), the plaintiff shall receive damages in the amount so found. Injunctive relief or an enforcement order under this subsection may be based upon a threatened injury, an actual injury, or both.Civil actions under this subsection shall be brought in the General Court of Justice of the county in which the alleged violation occurred. The court, in issuing any final order in any action brought pursuant to this section may award costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney and expert-witness fees, to any party, whenever it determines that such an award is appropriate. The court may, if a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction is sought, require the filing of a bond or equivalent security, the amount of such bond or security to be determined by the court. Nothing in this section shall restrict any right which any person or class of persons may have under the common law or under any statute to seek injunctive or other relief.
- Within the meaning of this section, violations of this Article include violations of local ordinances adopted pursuant to G.S. 113A-208 .
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1; 2019-111, s. 2.5(m); 2020-3, s. 4.33(a); 2020-25, s. 51(a), (b), (d).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.8, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 3.2, as amended by Session Laws 2020-3, s. 4.33(a), made the amendment of subsection (a) by Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.5(m), effective August 1, 2021, and applicable to local government development regulation decisions made on or after that date, and further provided that: “Part II of this act clarifies and restates the intent of existing law and applies to ordinances adopted before, on, and after the effective date.” Session Laws 2020-25, s. 51(a), (b), and (d), effective June 19, 2020, repealed Session Laws 2019-111, s. 3.2, and Session Laws 2020-3, s. 4.33(a), and provides: “Part II of S.L. 2019-111 [which amended this section] is effective when this act becomes law [June 19, 2020]. Part II of S.L. 2019-111 clarifies and restates the intent of law existing on the effective date of this act [June 19, 2020] and applies to ordinances adopted before, on, and after that date. Valid local government development regulations that are in effect at the time of the effective date of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 remain in effect but local governments shall amend those regulations to conform to the provisions of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 on or before July 1, 2021. Part II of S.L. 2019-111 applies to local government development regulation decisions made on or after the earlier of:
“(1) The effective date of the amendments to local development regulations made to conform to the provisions of Part II of S.L. 2019-111 or
“(2) July 1, 2021.”
Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2019-111, s. 2.5(m), substituted “provided by G.S. 160D-4-4” for “violations of county ordinances under G.S. 153A-123 ” at the end of subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.
§ 113A-212. Assistance to counties and cities under ridge law.
- The Secretary of Environmental Quality shall provide assistance upon request to the counties and cities in carrying out their functions pursuant to this Article, such as by providing model studies, plans, and ordinances for their consideration.
- The Secretary of Environmental Quality shall identify the protected mountain ridge crests in each county by showing them on a map or drawing, describing them in a document, or any combination thereof. Such maps, drawings, or documents shall identify the protected mountain ridges as defined in G.S. 113A-206 and such other mountain ridges as any county may request, and shall specify those protected mountain ridges that serve as all or part of the boundary line between two counties. By November 1, 1983, the map, drawing, or document tentatively identifying the protected mountain ridge crests of each county shall be filed with the board of county commissioners and with the city governing body of each city that requests it. By January 1, 1984, the map, drawing, or document identifying the protected mountain ridge crests shall be permanently filed by the Secretary with the register of deeds in the county where the land lies, and made available for inspection at the office of the North Carolina Geodetic Survey (NC Emergency Management/Risk Management) in Raleigh. Copies of the maps, drawings, or documents certified by the register of deeds, shall be admitted in evidence in all courts and shall have the same force and effect as would the original. (b1) By January 1, 1986, a map, drawing, or document tentatively identifying the protected mountain ridge crests of each city with a population of fifty thousand (50,000) or more that has eliminated the requirement for a minimum elevation of 3,000 feet, shall be filed by the Secretary of Environmental Quality with the board of county commissioners and with the city governing body. By March 1, 1986, the map, drawing, or document identifying the protected mountain ridge crests in the city with a population of fifty thousand (50,000) or more shall be permanently filed by the Secretary with the register of deeds in the county where the land within that city with a population of fifty thousand (50,000) or more lies, and shall be made available for inspection at the Secretary’s office in Raleigh. Copies of the maps, drawings, or documents certified by the register of deeds shall be admitted in evidence in all courts and shall have the same force and effect as would the original.
- Determinations by the Secretary of elevations under this section shall be conclusive in the absence of fraud.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1; 1985, c. 713, s. 3; 1989, c. 727, s. 218(79); 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(v); 2017-170, s. 3.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” throughout the section.
Session Laws 2017-170, s. 3, effective July 21, 2017, substituted “office of the North Carolina Geodetic Survey (NC Emergency Management/Risk Management)” for “Secretary’s office” in the fourth sentence of subsection (b).
§ 113A-213. Article is supplemental.
This Article provides a supplemental source of authority in addition to other present or future legislation and shall not be construed as prescribing an exclusive procedure or as granting exclusive powers.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
§ 113A-214. Choosing coverage or removal from coverage of this Article.
-
This Article shall apply in all counties and cities unless and until the jurisdiction adopts an ordinance exempting itself from the coverage of this Article.This exemption shall only be effective after a binding referendum, in which all registered voters in the jurisdiction are eligible to vote, which shall be held on or before May 8, 1984. The binding referendum shall be held either as a result of a resolution passed by the governing body of the jurisdiction or as a result of an initiative petition signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the registered voters in the jurisdiction and filed with the Board of Elections of that county not later than 60 days before the election is to be held. At that referendum, each qualified voter desiring to vote shall be provided a ballot on which shall be printed the following:
• FOR coverage under the Mountain Ridge Protection Act of 1983.• AGAINST coverage under the Mountain Ridge Protection Act of 1983.
- If a jurisdiction removes itself from the coverage of this Article, by means of a binding referendum, as provided for in subsection (a) of this section, then it shall have until May 13, 1986 to place itself again under the coverage of this Article by means of an ordinance passed after a similar binding referendum. Once a jurisdiction opts out and then opts back under the Article, it may not take any further action to again remove itself from the coverage of the Article.
- If a county has chosen the permit procedure authorized by G.S. 113A-208 , and then opts out of and either the county or any city in the county opts back under the coverage of this Article, then that jurisdiction may choose the permit procedure even after January 1, 1984.
- When a county removes itself from the coverage of this Article all cities within the county shall be removed from the coverage of this Article. Provided, however, a city in a county that has removed itself from coverage may, under the procedure set forth in subsection (b) of this section, place itself again under the coverage of this Article.
- When a protected mountain ridge is any part of the boundary between two jurisdictions then that part of the ridge shall be covered by this Article unless both jurisdictions remove themselves from the coverage of this Article.
History. 1983, c. 676, s. 1.
§§ 113A-215 through 113A-219.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 15. Aquatic Weed Control.
§ 113A-220. Short title.
This Article shall be known as the Aquatic Weed Control Act of 1991.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1.
§ 113A-221. Definitions.
Unless a different meaning is required by the context, the following definitions shall apply throughout this Article:
- “Department” means the Department of Environmental Quality.
- “Secretary” means the Secretary of Environmental Quality or his designee.
- “Noxious aquatic weed” means any plant organism so designated under this Article.
- “Waters of the State” means any surface body or accumulation of water, whether publicly or privately owned and whether naturally occurring or artificially created, which is contained within, flows through, or borders upon any part of this State.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(a); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), (v).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u) and (v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (1) and “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subdivision (2).
§ 113A-222. Designation of noxious aquatic weeds.
-
The Secretary, after consultation with the Director of the North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, the Wildlife Resources Commission, and the Marine Fisheries Commission, and with the concurrence of the Commissioner of Agriculture, may designate as a noxious aquatic weed any plant organism which:
- Grows in or is closely associated with the aquatic environment, whether floating, emersed, submersed, or ditch-bank species, and including terrestrial phases of any such plant organism;
- Exhibits characteristics of obstructive nature and either massive productivity or choking density; and
- Is or may become a threat to public health or safety or to existing or new beneficial uses of the waters of the State.
- A plant organism may be designated as being a noxious aquatic weed either throughout the State or within specified areas within the State.
- The Secretary shall designate a plant organism as a noxious aquatic weed by rules adopted pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
- The Secretary may modify or withdraw any designation of a plant organism as a noxious aquatic weed made previously under this section. Any modification or withdrawal of such designation shall be made following the procedures for designation set out in this section.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1.
§ 113A-223. Powers and duties of the Secretary.
-
The Secretary shall direct the control, eradication, and regulation of noxious aquatic weeds so as to protect and preserve human health, safety, and the beneficial uses of the waters of the State and to prevent injury to property and beneficial plant and animal life. The Secretary shall have the power to:
- Conduct research and planning related to the control of noxious aquatic weeds;
- Coordinate activities of all public bodies, authorities, agencies, and units of local government in the control and eradication of noxious aquatic weeds;
- Delegate to any public body, authority, agency, or unit of local government any power or duty under this Article, except that the Secretary may not delegate the designation of noxious aquatic weeds;
- Accept donations, grants, and services from both public and private sources;
- Enter into contracts or agreements, including cost-sharing agreements, with public or private agencies for research and development of methods of control of noxious aquatic weeds or for the performance of noxious aquatic weed control activities;
- Construct, acquire, operate, and maintain facilities and equipment necessary for the control of noxious aquatic weeds; and
- Enter upon private property for purposes of conducting investigations and engaging in aquatic weed control activities.
- The Secretary may control, remove, or destroy any noxious aquatic weed located in the waters of the State or in areas adjacent to such waters wherever such weeds threaten to invade such waters. The Secretary may employ any appropriate control technology which is consistent with federal and State law, regulations, and rules. Control technologies may include, but are not limited to drawdown of waters, application of chemicals to shoreline and surface waters, mechanical controls, physical removal from transport mechanisms, quarantine of transport mechanisms, and biological controls. Any biological control technology may be implemented only after the environmental review provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act have been satisfied.
- In determining the appropriate strategies and technologies, the Secretary shall consider their relative short-term and long-term cost-efficiency and effectiveness, consistent with a margin of safety adequate to protect public health and the resources of the State.
- All activities carried out by the Secretary, his designees, and others authorized to perform any function under this Article shall be consistent with all applicable federal and State law, regulations, and rules.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1.
§ 113A-224. Powers of the Commissioner of Agriculture.
- The Commissioner of Agriculture may regulate the importation, sale, use, culture, collection, transportation, and distribution of a noxious aquatic weed as a plant pest under Article 36 of Chapter 106 of the General Statutes.
- This Article shall not be construed to limit any power of the Commissioner of Agriculture, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, or the Board of Agriculture under any other provision of law.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1; 1997-261, s. 109.
§ 113A-225. Responsibilities of other State agencies.
All State agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary to assist in the implementation of this Article.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1.
§ 113A-226. Enforcement.
- Any person who violates this Article or any rule adopted pursuant to this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor for each offense.
- Whenever there exists reasonable cause to believe that any person has violated this Article or rules adopted pursuant to this Article, the Secretary may request the Attorney General to institute a civil action for injunctive relief to restrain the violation. The Attorney General may institute such action in the name of the State upon relation of the Department in the superior court of the county in which the violation occurred. Upon a determination by the court that the alleged violation of the provisions of this Article or of rules adopted pursuant to this Article has occurred or is threatened, the court shall grant the relief necessary to prevent or abate the violation or threatened violation. Neither the institution of the action, nor any of the proceedings thereon shall relieve any party to such proceedings from any penalty otherwise prescribed for violations of this Article.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1; c. 761, s. 20; 1993, c. 539, s. 877; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).
§ 113A-227. Adoption of rules.
The Secretary may adopt rules necessary to implement the provisions of this Article pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
History. 1991, c. 132, s. 1.
§§ 113A-228, 113A-229.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 16. Conservation Easements Program.
§ 113A-230. Legislative findings; intent.
The General Assembly finds that a statewide network of protected natural areas, riparian buffers, and greenways can best be accomplished through a conservation easements program. The General Assembly further finds that other public conservation and use programs, such as natural area protection, beach access, trail systems, historic landscape protection, and agricultural preservation, can benefit from increased conservation tools. In this Article, the General Assembly therefore intends to extend the ability of the Department of Environmental Quality to achieve these purposes and to strengthen the capability of private nonprofit land trusts to participate in land and water conservation.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(b); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources.”
Legal Periodicals.
For article, “The Evolution of Modern North Carolina Environmental and Conservation Policy Legislation,” see 29 Campbell L. Rev. 535 (2007).
§ 113A-231. Program to accomplish conservation purposes.
The Department of Environmental Quality shall develop a nonregulatory program to accomplish conservation purposes, including the maintenance of ecological systems. As a part of this program, the Department shall exercise its powers to protect real property and interests in real property donated for conservation or conserved by other means. The Department shall call upon the Attorney General for legal assistance in developing and implementing the program.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(b); 2002-155, s. 1; 2014-3, s. 14.14(c); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u).
Editor’s Note.
Section 105-130.34, referred to in this section, was repealed by Session Laws 2013-316, s. 2.1(b), effective January 1, 2014.
Section 105-151.12, referred to in this section, was repealed by Session Laws 2013-316, s. 1.1(b), effective January 1, 2014
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2014-3, s. 14.14(c), effective May 29, 2014, deleted “that uses conservation tax credits as a prominent tool” preceding “to accomplish” in the first sentence and substituted “property donated for conservation or conserved by other means.” for “property donated for tax credit under G.S. 105-130.34 or G.S. 105-151.12, conserved with the use of other financial incentives, or, conserved through nonregulatory programs.” at the end of the second sentence.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources.”
§ 113A-232. Conservation Grant Fund.
-
Fund Created. — The Conservation Grant Fund is created within the Department of Environmental Quality. The Fund shall be administered by the Department.
(a1) Fund Purpose. — The purpose of the Conservation Grant Fund is to stimulate the use of conservation easements, to steward properties held by deed or conservation easement by the State, to improve the capacity of private nonprofit land trust organizations to successfully accomplish conservation projects, to better equip real estate related professionals to pursue opportunities for conservation, to increase landowner participation in land and water conservation, and to provide an opportunity to leverage private and other public funds for conservation easements.
- Fund Sources. — The Conservation Grant Fund shall consist of any funds appropriated to it by the General Assembly and any funds received from public or private sources. Unexpended funds in the Fund that were appropriated from the General Fund by the General Assembly shall revert at the end of the fiscal year unless the General Assembly otherwise provides. Unexpended funds in the Fund from other sources shall not revert and shall remain available for expenditure in accordance with this Article.
- Recodified as G.S. 113A-235 (a) by Session Laws 2020-78, s. 7.4(a), effective July 1, 2020. (c1) Grant Eligibility. — Conservation properties, as described in G.S. 113A-235 , State conservation land management agencies, local government conservation land management agencies, and private nonprofit land trust organizations are eligible to receive grants from the Conservation Grant Fund. Private nonprofit land trust organizations must be certified under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code to aid in managing the land.
-
Use of Revenue. — Revenue and investment income generated by the Conservation Grant Fund may be used only for the following purposes:
- The costs of the Department in administering the Fund and stewardship program operations.
-
Expenses related to grants, contracts, and agreements made in accordance with this Article, including any of the following:
-
Reimbursement for total or partial transaction costs for a donation of real property or an interest in real property from an individual or corporation, when the Department determines either of the following:
- The donor has insufficient financial ability to pay all costs or insufficient taxable income to allow these costs to be included in the donated value.
- The donor has insufficient tax burdens to allow these costs to be offset by charitable deductions.
- Management support, including initial baseline inventory and planning.
- Monitoring compliance of conservation easements, the related use of riparian buffers, natural areas, and greenways, and the presence of ecological integrity.
- Education and studies on conservation properties, including information materials intended for landowners and education for staff and volunteers.
- Stewardship of conservation properties.
- Transaction costs for recipients, including legal expenses, closing and title costs, and unusual direct costs, such as overnight travel.
- Administrative costs.
- Award of grants under G.S. 113A-234 .
- Legal expenses incurred in protecting and seeking remedies for damages to Department-held conservation properties.
- Acquisition of conservation properties and easements.
-
Reimbursement for total or partial transaction costs for a donation of real property or an interest in real property from an individual or corporation, when the Department determines either of the following:
- To establish an endowment account, the interest from which will be used for a purpose described in this subsection. The principal of this account shall not be used for the purchase of real property or an interest in real property.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(b); 2002-155, s. 2; 2003-340, s. 1.4; 2014-3, s. 14.14(d); 2015-241, s. 14.30(u); 2020-78, s. 7.4(a), (b).
Editor’s Note.
“G.S. 143B-135.254(3)” was substituted for “G.S. 113A-164.3(3)” in subdivision (c)(3)f. at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes to conform to the recodification by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k2).
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 7.4(a), (b), effective July 1, 2020, recodified former subsection (c) as G.S. 113-235(a); and rewrote the section.
§ 113A-233. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2020-78, s. 7.4(c), effective July 1, 2020.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 2002-155, s. 3; 2014-3, s. 14.14(e); repealed by 2020-78, s. 7.4(c), effective July 1, 2020.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-233 pertained to uses of a grant from the Conservation Grant Fund.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
§ 113A-234. Administration of grants.
- Grant Procedures and Criteria. — The Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality shall establish the procedures and criteria for awarding grants from the Conservation Grant Fund. The criteria shall focus grants on those areas, approaches, and techniques that are likely to provide the optimum positive effect on environmental protection. The Secretary shall make the final decision on the award of grants and shall announce the award publicly in a timely manner.
- Grant Administration. — The Secretary may administer the grants under this Article or may contract for selected activities under this Article. If administrative services are contracted, the Department shall establish guidance and criteria for its operation and contract with a statewide nonprofit land trust service organization.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(b); 2002-155, s. 4; 2015-241, s. 14.30(v); 2020-78, s. 7.4(d).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Secretary of Environmental Quality” for “Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (a).
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 7.4(d), effective July 1, 2020, added “the Department of” in the first sentence of subsection (a).
§ 113A-235. Conservation properties eligible for funding.
-
Property Eligibility. — In order for real property or an interest in real property to be eligible for a grant under this Article as a conservation property, the real property or interest in real property must meet all of the following conditions:
- Possess or have a high potential to possess ecological value.
- Be reasonably restorable, previously restored, or a high-quality preservation.
-
Be useful for one or more of the following purposes:
- Public beach access or use.
- Public access to public waters or trails.
- Fish and wildlife conservation.
- Forestland or farmland conservation.
- Watershed protection or improvement.
- Conservation of natural areas, as that term is defined in G.S. 143B-135.254(3).
- Conservation of predominantly natural parkland.
- Be purchased on behalf of, donated, or assigned in perpetuity to and accepted by the State, a local government, or a body that is both organized to receive and administer lands for conservation purposes and qualified to receive charitable contributions under G.S. 105-130.9 . Land required to be dedicated pursuant to local governmental regulation or ordinance and dedications made to increase building density levels permitted under a regulation or ordinance do not qualify. (a1) Acquisition and Protection of Conservation Properties. — Ecological systems and appropriate public use of these systems may be protected through conservation easements, including conservation agreements under Article 4 of Chapter 121 of the General Statutes, the Conservation and Historic Preservation Agreements Act, and conservation easements under the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. The Department may acquire conservation properties and easements by purchase, gift, or assignment, in accordance with G.S. 146-22 . The Department of Environmental Quality shall work cooperatively with State and local agencies and qualified nonprofit organizations to monitor compliance with conservation easements and conservation agreements and to ensure the continued viability of the protected ecosystems. Soil and water conservation districts established under Chapter 139 of the General Statutes may acquire easements under the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program by purchase or gift.
- Conveyance of Conservation Lands. — The Department may convey real property or an interest in real property that has been acquired for conservation in perpetuity to a federal agency, State agency, a local government, or a private nonprofit conservation organization in accordance with State law governing the conveyance of real property. The grantee of real property or an interest in real property shall manage and maintain the real property or interest in real property for the purposes set out in subsection (a) of this section. When conveying real property or an interest in real property under this subsection, the Department shall retain a possibility of reverter, a right of entry, or other appropriate property interest to ensure that the real property or interest in real property will continue to be managed and maintained in a manner that protects ecological systems and the appropriate public use of these systems.
- Report. — The Department shall report on the implementation of this Article to the Environmental Review Commission no later than 1 October of each year. The Department shall maintain an inventory of all conservation easements held by the Department. The inventory shall be included in the report required by this subsection.
History. 1997-226, s. 6; 1997-443, s. 11A.119(b); 1999-329, s. 6.3; 2002-155, s. 5; 2004-195, s. 2.2; 2015-241, s. 14.30(u); 2020-78, s. 7.4(a), (e).
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 1999-329, s. 13.7, provides: “This act shall not be construed to obligate the General Assembly to appropriate funds to implement the provisions of this act. Every State agency to which this act applies shall implement the provisions of this act from funds otherwise appropriated or available to that agency.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
Effect of Amendments.
Session Laws 2004-195, s. 2.2, effective August 17, 2004, substituted “October” for “November” in subsection (c).
Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(u), effective July 1, 2015, substituted “Department of Environmental Quality” for “Department of Environment and Natural Resources” in subsection (a).
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 7.4(a), (e), effective July 1, 2020, recodified former G.S. 113A-232(c) as present subsection (a) of this section; recodified former subsection (a) as subsection (a1); substituted “properties eligible for funding” for “easements” in the section heading; substituted “eligible for a grant under this Article as a conservation property” for “the subject of a grant under this Article” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (a); added “previously restored, or a high-quality preservation” at the end of subdivision (a)(2); added “or improvement” at the end of sub-subdivision (a)(3)e.; substituted “purchased on behalf of, donated, or assigned in” for “donated in” at the beginning of subdivision (a)(4); and, in subsection (a1), substituted “Properties” for “Easements” in the heading, and added the second sentence.
§§ 113A-236 through 113A-239.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 17. Conservation, Farmland, and Open Space Protection and Coordination. [Repealed]
§ 113A-240. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.230(a), (c), by Session Laws 2020-78, s. 8.4(a), effective July 1, 2020.
Editor’s Note.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
§ 113A-241. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2020-78, s. 8.4(c), effective July 1, 2020.
History. 2000-23, ss. 2, 3; 2001-452, s. 2.2; 2004-195, s. 2.3; 2015-241, s. 14.30(v), repealed by 2020-78, s. 8.4(c), effective July 1, 2020.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-241 pertained to the State to Preserve One Million Acres; annual report.
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”
Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.
§§ 113A-242 through 113A-250.
Reserved for future codification purposes.
Article 18. Clean Water Management Trust Fund. [Repealed]
§ 113A-251.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.230 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-252. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.232 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-253. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.234 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-253.1. [Repealed]
Repealed by Session Laws 2011-145, s. 13.26(a), effective July 1, 2011.
History. 1996, 2nd Ex. Sess., c. 18, s. 27.6(b); 1997-443, s. 7.9(a); 2000-67, ss. 7.7(b)-(d); 2001-474, s. 26; 2006-203, s. 5(a), (b); 2011-374, s. 2.3; repealed by 2011-145, s. 13.26(a), effective July 1, 2011.
Editor’s Note.
Former G.S. 113A-253.1 pertained to the Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
Session Laws 2011-374, s. 2.3, effective June 27, 2011, had amended subsection (a) of this section.
This section was formerly G.S. 143-15.3B. It was recodified as G.S. 113A-253.1 pursuant to Session Laws 2006-203, s. 5(a), effective July 1, 2007.
§ 113A-253.2.
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.236 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-254. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.238 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-255. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.240 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-256. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.242 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-257. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.244 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-258. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.246 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
§ 113A-259. [Repealed]
Recodified as G.S. 143B-135.248 by Session Laws 2015-241, s. 14.30(k1), effective July 1, 2015.
Editor’s Note.
G.S. 143B-135.248 was repealed by Session Laws 2019-32, s. 1(a), effective July 1, 2019.