PROPERTY TAX

General and Administrative

Editor's note: Articles 1 to 4, part 1 of article 5, and articles 6 to 12 of this title were numbered as articles 1 to 12 of chapter 137, C.R.S. 1963. These articles and part 1 were repealed and reenacted in 1964, resulting in the addition, relocation, or elimination of sections as well as subject matter. For amendments to these articles and part 1 prior to 1964, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Cross references: For the constitutional provisions establishing the maximum rate of taxation on property, see § 11 of article X of the state constitution; for the constitutional provision that establishes limitations on spending, the imposition of taxes, and the incurring of debt, see § 20 of article X of the state constitution.

Section

39-1-101. Legislative declaration.

The general assembly declares that its purpose in enacting articles 1 to 13 of this title is to exercise the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution wherein it is provided, among other things, that "the actual value of all real and personal property not exempt from taxation under this article shall be determined under general laws, which shall prescribe such methods and regulations as shall secure just and equalized valuations for assessment of all real and personal property not exempt from taxation under this article". It further declares that it intends to fix the percentage of such determined actual value at which all such property shall be assessed for taxation. It further declares that the actual value of certain classes of real property may not be able to be determined after appropriate consideration of the three approaches to value; therefore, it is incumbent upon the general assembly to provide for a means to determine the actual value of such taxable property, and, to effect this result, the general assembly hereby finds and declares that, when appropriate consideration of the three approaches to value fails to derive an actual value for such property, the actual value of such property shall be determined by comparison of the surface use of such property to property with a similar surface use. It further declares that the actual value of nonproducing oil, gas, and oil and gas mineral interests shall be determined by the income approach capitalizing annual net rental income at an appropriate market rate. To these ends, the provisions of said articles shall be strictly construed.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 675, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-2. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1480, § 1, effective April 22. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 1209, § 1, effective May 9.

ANNOTATION

"Actual value" of residential property must be determined using means and methods applied impartially to all the members of each class, in order to reconcile the requirement of article X, § 20, of the constitution that the market approach be used for valuation with the equalization requirement of article X, § 3. Podoll v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 920 P.2d 861 (Colo. App. 1995), rev'd on other grounds, 935 P.2d 14 ( Colo. 1997 ).

Statute does not prohibit general assembly from adopting other statutes concerning imposition of property taxes. Senior Corp. v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 702 P.2d 732 (Colo. 1985).

Reclassification from residential to commercial property was just and equal where property was used as a community center in a planned community development despite fact that model homes used for commercial purposes in same county are classified as residential. Mission Viejo v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994).

Valuation was not just and equal where county could offer no reasonable explanation why there was a 32.8% increase in the assessed value of plaintiffs' residences but only a 10.73% average increase as to the vast majority of comparable residences. Podoll v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 920 P.2d 861 (Colo. App. 1995), rev'd on other grounds, 935 P.2d 14 ( Colo. 1997 ).

In determining whether a valuation for assessment is just and equal under the "designed for use" standard, actual use is only one factor to be considered. Mission Viejo v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994).

Applied in City & County of Denver v. Sec. Life & Accident Co., 173 Colo. 248 , 477 P.2d 369 (1970).

39-1-101.5. Legislative declaration - taxpayer rights.

The general assembly hereby finds and declares that section 3 of article X of the state constitution was approved in 1982 by the voters of Colorado in order to ensure the fair and uniform valuation for assessment of real and personal property located in Colorado; that, since the adoption of said constitutional amendment, the property tax system in Colorado has developed into an impersonal system which is more concerned with the mechanisms to levy and collect such property tax than with the fair and courteous treatment of the owners of real and personal property who pay such tax; that the purpose of the property tax system is to raise revenues to be used for purposes which benefit the citizens of Colorado, including such property owners; that property owners accept their civic responsibility to pay their fair share of taxes to be used for such purposes; that all levels of government involved in the property tax system should recognize that they exist to serve their citizens; and that the owners of real and personal property should be accorded the respect and courtesy which they deserve and should be provided such services which are necessary to assist them in complying with the property tax laws of this state.

Source: L. 88: Entire section added, p. 1276, § 1, effective January 1, 1989.

39-1-102. Definitions.

As used in articles 1 to 13 of this title 39, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Administrator" means the property tax administrator.

    (1.1) "Agricultural and livestock products" means plant or animal products in a raw or unprocessed state that are derived from the science and art of agriculture, regardless of the use of the product after its sale and regardless of the entity that purchases the product. "Agriculture", for the purposes of this subsection (1.1), means farming, ranching, animal husbandry, and horticulture.

    (1.3) "Agricultural equipment which is used on the farm or ranch in the production of agricultural products":

    1. Means any personal property used on a farm or ranch, as defined in subsections (3.5) and (13.5) of this section, for planting, growing, and harvesting agricultural products or for raising or breeding livestock for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit; and
    2. Includes:
      1. Any mechanical system used on the farm or ranch for the conveyance and storage of animal products in a raw or unprocessed state, regardless of whether or not such mechanical system is affixed to real property; and
      2. Silviculture personal property that is designed, adapted, and used for the planting, growing, maintenance, or harvesting of trees in a raw or unprocessed state.

    1. (1.6) (a) "Agricultural land", whether used by the owner of the land or a lessee, means one of the following:
        1. A parcel of land, whether located in an incorporated or unincorporated area and regardless of the uses for which such land is zoned, that was used the previous two years and presently is used as a farm or ranch, as defined in subsections (3.5) and (13.5) of this section, or that is in the process of being restored through conservation practices. Such land must have been classified or eligible for classification as "agricultural land", consistent with this subsection (1.6), during the ten years preceding the year of assessment. Such land must continue to have actual agricultural use. "Agricultural land" under this subparagraph (I) shall not include two acres or less of land on which a residential improvement is located unless the improvement is integral to an agricultural operation conducted on such land. "Agricultural land" also includes the land underlying other improvements if such improvements are an integral part of the farm or ranch and if such other improvements and the land area dedicated to such other improvements are typically used as an ancillary part of the operation. The use of a portion of such land for hunting, fishing, or other wildlife purposes, for monetary profit or otherwise, shall not affect the classification of agricultural land. For purposes of this subparagraph (I), a parcel of land shall be "in the process of being restored through conservation practices" if: The land has been placed in a conservation reserve program established by the natural resources conservation service pursuant to 7 U.S.C. secs. 1 to 5506; or a conservation plan approved by the appropriate conservation district has been implemented for the land for up to a period of ten crop years as if the land has been placed in such a conservation reserve program.
        2. A residential improvement shall be deemed to be "integral to an agricultural operation" for purposes of sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (I) if an individual occupying the residential improvement either regularly conducts, supervises, or administers material aspects of the agricultural operation or is the spouse or a parent, grandparent, sibling, or child of the individual.
      1. A parcel of land that consists of at least forty acres, that is forest land, that is used to produce tangible wood products that originate from the productivity of such land for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit, that is subject to a forest management plan, and that is not a farm or ranch, as defined in subsections (3.5) and (13.5) of this section. "Agricultural land" under this subparagraph (II) includes land underlying any residential improvement located on such agricultural land.
      2. A parcel of land that consists of at least eighty acres, or of less than eighty acres if such parcel does not contain any residential improvements, and that is subject to a perpetual conservation easement, if such land was classified by the assessor as agricultural land under subparagraph (I) or (II) of this paragraph (a) at the time such easement was granted, if the grant of the easement was to a qualified organization, if the easement was granted exclusively for conservation purposes, and if all current and contemplated future uses of the land are described in the conservation easement. "Agricultural land" under this subparagraph (III) does not include any portion of such land that is actually used for nonagricultural commercial or nonagricultural residential purposes.
      3. A parcel of land, whether located in an incorporated or unincorporated area and regardless of the uses for which such land is zoned, used as a farm or ranch, as defined in subsections (3.5) and (13.5) of this section, if the owner of the land has a decreed right to appropriated water granted in accordance with article 92 of title 37, C.R.S., or a final permit to appropriated groundwater granted in accordance with article 90 of title 37, C.R.S., for purposes other than residential purposes, and water appropriated under such right or permit shall be and is used for the production of agricultural or livestock products on such land;
      4. A parcel of land, whether located in an incorporated or unincorporated area and regardless of the uses for which such land is zoned, that has been reclassified from agricultural land to a classification other than agricultural land and that met the definition of agricultural land as set forth in subparagraphs (I) to (IV) of this paragraph (a) during the three years before the year of assessment. For purposes of this subparagraph (V), the parcel of land need not have been classified or eligible for classification as agricultural land during the ten years preceding the year of assessment as required by subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a).
      1. Except as provided in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b), all other agricultural property that does not meet the definition set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.6) shall be classified as all other property and shall be valued using appropriate consideration of the three approaches to appraisal based on its actual use on the assessment date.
      2. On and after January 1, 2015, "all other agricultural property" includes greenhouse and nursery production areas used to grow food products, agricultural products, or horticultural stock for wholesale purposes only that originate above the ground.
    2. An assessor must determine, based on sufficient evidence, that a parcel of land does not qualify as agricultural land, as defined in subparagraph (IV) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.6), before land may be changed from agricultural land to any other classification.
    3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, property that is used solely for the cultivation of medical marijuana shall not be classified as agricultural land.
  2. "Assessor" means the elected assessor of a county, or his or her appointed successor, and, in the case of the city and county of Denver, such equivalent officer as may be provided by its charter, and, in the case of the city and county of Broomfield, such equivalent officer as may be provided by its charter or code.

    (2.5) "Bed and breakfast" means an overnight lodging establishment, whether owned by a natural person or any legal entity, that is a residential dwelling unit or an appurtenance thereto, in which the innkeeper resides, or that is a building designed but not necessarily occupied as a single family residence that is next to, or directly across the street from, the innkeeper's residence, and in either circumstance, in which:

    1. Lodging accommodations are provided for a fee;
    2. At least one meal per day is provided at no charge other than the fee for the lodging accommodations; and
    3. There are not more than thirteen sleeping rooms available for transient guests.
  3. "Board" means the board of assessment appeals.

    (3.1) "Commercial lodging area" means a guest room or a private or shared bathroom within a bed and breakfast that is offered for the exclusive use of paying guests on a nightly or weekly basis. Classification of a guest room or a bathroom as a "commercial lodging area" shall be based on whether at any time during a year such rooms are offered by an innkeeper as nightly or weekly lodging to guests for a fee. Classification shall not be based on the number of days that such rooms are actually occupied by paying guests.

    (3.2) "Conservation purpose" means any of the following purposes as set forth in section 170 (h) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended:

    1. The preservation of land areas for outdoor recreation, the education of the public, or the protection of a relatively natural habitat for fish, wildlife, plants, or similar ecosystems; or
    2. The preservation of open space, including farmland and forest land, where such preservation is for the scenic enjoyment of the public or is pursuant to a clearly delineated federal, state, or local government conservation policy and where such preservation will yield a significant public benefit.

    (3.5) "Farm" means a parcel of land which is used to produce agricultural products that originate from the land's productivity for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit.

    (3.7) "Fee simple estate" means the largest possible estate allowed by law, an estate that has potentially infinite duration.

  4. "Fixtures" means those articles which, although once movable chattels, have become an accessory to and a part of real property by having been physically incorporated therein or annexed or affixed thereto. "Fixtures" includes systems for the heating, air conditioning, ventilation, sanitation, lighting, and plumbing of such building. "Fixtures" does not include machinery, equipment, or other articles related to a commercial or industrial operation which are affixed to the real property for proper utilization of such articles. In addition, for property tax purposes only, "fixtures" does not include security devices and systems affixed to any residential improvements, including but not limited to security doors, security bars, and alarm systems.

    (4.3) "Forest land" means land of which at least ten percent is stocked by forest trees of any size and includes land that formerly had such tree cover and that will be naturally or artificially regenerated. "Forest land" includes roadside, streamside, and shelterbelt strips of timber which have a crown width of at least one hundred twenty feet. "Forest land" includes unimproved roads and trails, streams, and clearings which are less than one hundred twenty feet wide.

    (4.4) "Forest management plan" means an agreement which includes a plan to aid the owner of forest land in increasing the health, vigor, and beauty of such forest land through use of forest management practices and which has been either executed between the owner of forest land and the Colorado state forest service or executed between the owner of forest land and a professional forester and has been reviewed and has received a favorable recommendation from the Colorado state forest service. The Colorado forest service shall annually inspect each parcel of land subject to a forest management plan to determine if the terms and conditions of such plan are being complied with and shall report by March 1 of each year to the assessor in each affected county the legal descriptions of the properties and the names of their owners that are eligible for the agricultural classification. The report shall also contain the legal descriptions of those properties and the names of their owners that no longer qualify for the agricultural classification because of noncompliance with their forest management plans. No property shall be entitled to the agricultural classification unless the legal description and the name of the owner appear on the report submitted by the Colorado state forest service. The Colorado state forest service shall charge a fee for the inspection of each parcel of land in such amount for the reasonable costs incurred by the Colorado state forest service in conducting such inspections. Such fee shall be paid by the owner of such land prior to such inspection. Any fees collected pursuant to this subsection (4.4) shall be subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly.

    (4.5) "Forest management practices" means practices accepted by professional foresters which control forest establishment, composition, density, and growth for the purpose of producing forest products and associated amenities following sound business methods and technical forestry principles.

    (4.6) "Forest trees" means woody plants which have a well-developed stem or stems, which are usually more than twelve feet in height at maturity, and which have a generally well-defined crown.

  5. Repealed.

    1. (5.5) (a) "Hotels and motels" means improvements and the land associated with such improvements that are used by a business establishment primarily to provide lodging, camping, or personal care or health facilities to the general public and that are predominantly used on an overnight or weekly basis; except that "hotels and motels" does not include:
      1. A residential unit, except for a residential unit that is a hotel unit;
      2. A residential unit that would otherwise be classified as a hotel unit if the residential unit is held as inventory by a developer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the developer's trade or business, is marketed for sale by the developer, and either has been held by the developer for less than two years since the certificate of occupancy for the residential unit has been issued or is not depreciated under the internal revenue code, as defined in section 39-22-103 (5.3), while owned by the developer; or
      3. A residential unit that would otherwise be classified as a hotel unit if the residential unit has been acquired by a lender or an owners' association through foreclosure, a deed in lieu of foreclosure, or a similar transaction, is marketed for sale by the lender or owners' association and is not depreciated under the internal revenue code, as defined in section 39-22-103 (5.3), while owned by the lender or owners' association.
      4. Repealed.
    2. If any time share estate, time share use period, undivided interest, or other partial ownership interest in any hotel unit is owned by any non-hotel unit owner, then, unless a declaration or other express agreement binding on the non-hotel unit owners and the hotel unit owners provides otherwise:
      1. The hotel unit owners shall pay the taxes on the hotel unit not required to be paid by the non-hotel unit owners pursuant to subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b).
      2. Each non-hotel unit owner shall pay that portion of the taxes on the hotel unit equal to the non-hotel unit owner's ownership or usage percentage of the hotel unit multiplied by the property tax that would have been levied on the hotel unit if the actual value and valuation for assessment of the hotel unit had been determined as if the hotel unit was residential real property.
      3. For purposes of determining the amount due from any hotel unit owner or non-hotel unit owner pursuant to subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b), the assessor shall, upon the request of any hotel unit owner or non-hotel unit owner, calculate the property tax that would have been levied on the hotel unit if the actual value and valuation for assessment of the hotel unit had been determined as if the hotel unit were residential real property. A hotel unit owner or non-hotel unit owner may petition the county board of equalization for review of the assessor's calculation pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 39-10-114. Any appeal from the decision of the county board shall be governed by section 39-10-114.5.
    3. As used in this subsection (5.5):
      1. "Condominium unit" means a unit, as defined in section 38-33.3-103 (30), C.R.S., and also includes a time share unit.
      2. "Hotel unit owners" means any person or member of a group of related persons whose ownership and use of a residential unit cause the residential unit to be classified as a hotel unit.
      3. "Hotel units" means more than four residential unit ownership equivalents in a project that are owned, in whole or in part, directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate entities, by one person or by a group of related persons if the person or group of related persons uses the residential units or parts thereof in connection with a business establishment primarily to provide lodging, camping, or personal care or health facilities to the general public predominantly on an overnight or weekly basis. "Hotel unit" means any residential unit included in hotel units. For purposes of this subparagraph (III):
        1. "Control" means the power to direct the business or affairs of an entity through direct or indirect ownership of stock, partnership interests, membership interests, or other forms of beneficial interests.
        2. "Related persons" means individuals who are members of the same family, including only spouses and minor children, or persons who control, are controlled by, or are under common control with each other. Persons are not related persons solely because they engage a common agent to manage or rent their residential units, they are members of an owners' association or similar group, they enter into a tenancy in common or a similar agreement with respect to undivided interests in a residential unit, or any combination of the foregoing.
      4. "Project" means one or more improvements that contain residential units if the boundaries of the residential units are described in or determined by the same declaration, as defined in section 38-33.3-103 (13), C.R.S.
      5. "Residential unit" means a condominium unit, a single family residence, or a townhome.
      6. "Non-hotel unit owner" means any owner of a time share estate, time share use period, undivided interest, or other partial ownership interest in any hotel unit who is not a hotel unit owner with respect to the hotel unit.
      7. "Residential unit ownership equivalent" means:
        1. In the case of time share units, time share interests or time share use periods in one or more time share units that in the aggregate entitle the owner of such time share interests or time share use periods to three hundred sixty-five days of use in any calendar year or three hundred sixty-six days of use in any calendar year that is a leap year; and
        2. In the case of residential units other than time share units, undivided interests or other ownership interests in one or more such residential units that total one hundred percent. For purposes of this sub-subparagraph (B), any undivided interest or other ownership interest not stated in terms of a percentage of total ownership shall be converted to a percentage of total ownership based on the rights accorded to the holder of the undivided interest or other ownership interest.
      8. "Time share unit" means a condominium unit that is divided into time share estates as defined in section 38-33-110 (5) or that is subject to a time share use as defined in section 12-10-501 (4).

    (5.6) "Hotels and motels" as defined in subsection (5.5) of this section shall not include bed and breakfasts.

  6. "Household furnishings" means that personal property, other than fixtures, in residential structures and buildings which is not used for the production of income at any time.

    (6.3) "Improvements" means all structures, buildings, fixtures, fences, and water rights erected upon or affixed to land, whether or not title to such land has been acquired.

    (6.8) "Independently owned residential solar electric generation facility" means personal property that:

    1. Is located on residential real property;
    2. Is owned by a person other than the owner of the residential real property;
    3. Is installed on the customer's side of the meter;
    4. Is used to produce electricity from solar energy primarily for use in the residential improvements located on the residential real property; and
    5. Has a production capacity of no more than one hundred kilowatts.
  7. (Deleted by amendment, L. 2010, (HB 10-1267), ch. 425, p. 2198, § 1, effective August 11, 2010.)

    (7.1) "Innkeeper" means the owner, operator, or manager of a bed and breakfast.

    (7.2) "Inventories of merchandise and materials and supplies which are held for consumption by a business or are held primarily for sale" means those classes of personal property which are held primarily for sale by a business, farm, or ranch, including components of personal property to be held for sale, or which are held for consumption by a business, farm, or ranch, or which are rented for thirty days or less. For the purposes of this subsection (7.2), "personal property rented for thirty days or less" means personal property rented for thirty days or less which can be returned at the option of the person renting the property, in a transaction on which the sales or use tax is actually collected before being finally sold, whether or not such personal property is subject to depreciation. It is the purpose of the general assembly to exempt "personal property rented for thirty days or less" from property tax because of the similarity of such property to inventories of merchandise held by retail stores. Further, the general assembly intends this exemption to encompass a transaction under a rental agreement in which the customer pays rent in order to use an item for a brief period of time; it is not intended to encompass an equipment lease contract covering a specific period of time and which includes financial penalties for early cancellation. Except for "personal property rented for thirty days or less", the term "inventories of merchandise and materials and supplies which are held for consumption by a business or are held primarily for sale" does not include personal property which is held for rent or lease or is subject to an allowance for depreciation. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1984, the term does include inventory which is owned by and which is in the possession of the manufacturer of such inventory unless:

    1. Such inventory is in the possession of the manufacturer after having previously been leased by the manufacturer to a customer; and
    2. Such manufacturer has not designated such inventory for scrapping, substantial reconditioning, renovating, or remanufacturing in accordance with its customary practices. For the purposes of this paragraph (b), normal maintenance shall not constitute substantial reconditioning, renovating, or remanufacturing.

    (7.5) Repealed.

    (7.7) "Livestock" includes all animals.

    (7.8) "Manufactured home" means any preconstructed building unit or combination of preconstructed building units that:

    1. Includes electrical, mechanical, or plumbing services that are fabricated, formed, or assembled at a location other than the residential site of the completed home;
    2. Is designed and used for residential occupancy in either temporary or permanent locations;
    3. Is constructed in compliance with the "National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974", 42 U.S.C. sec. 5401 et seq., as amended;
    4. Does not have motive power;
    5. Is not licensed as a vehicle; and
    6. Is eligible for a certificate of title pursuant to part 1 of article 29 of title 38, C.R.S.

    (7.9) "Minerals in place" means, without exception, metallic and nonmetallic mineral substances of every kind while in the ground.

  8. "Mobile home" means a manufactured home built prior to the adoption of the "National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974", 42 U.S.C. sec. 5401 et seq., as amended.

    (8.3) "Modular home" means any preconstructed factory-built building that:

    1. Is ineligible for a certificate of title pursuant to part 1 of article 29 of title 38, C.R.S.;
    2. Is not constructed in compliance with the "National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974", 42 U.S.C. sec. 5401 et seq., as amended; and
    3. Is constructed in compliance with building codes adopted by the division of housing in the department of local affairs.

    (8.4) "Natural cause" means fire, explosion, flood, tornado, action of the elements, act of war or terror, or similar cause beyond the control of and not caused by the party holding title to the property destroyed.

    (8.5) "Not for private gain or corporate profit" means the ownership and use of property whereby no person with any connection to the owner thereof shall receive any pecuniary benefit except for reasonable compensation for services rendered and any excess income over expenses derived from the operation or use of the property and all proceeds from the sale of the property of the owner shall be devoted to the furthering of any exempt purpose.

    (8.7) "Perpetual conservation easement" means a conservation easement in gross, as described in article 30.5 of title 38, C.R.S., that qualifies as a perpetual conservation restriction pursuant to section 170 (h) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, and any regulations issued thereunder.

  9. "Person" means natural persons, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, associations, and other legal entities which are or may become taxpayers by reason of the ownership of taxable real or personal property.
  10. "Personal effects" means such personal property as is or may be worn or carried on or about the person, and such personal property as is usually associated with the person or customarily used in personal hobby, sporting, or recreational activities and which is not used for the production of income at any time.
  11. "Personal property" means everything that is the subject of ownership and that is not included within the term "real property". "Personal property" includes machinery, equipment, and other articles related to a commercial or industrial operation that are either affixed or not affixed to the real property for proper utilization of such articles. Except as otherwise specified in articles 1 to 13 of this title, any pipeline, telecommunications line, utility line, cable television line, or other similar business asset or article installed through an easement, right-of-way, or leasehold for the purpose of commercial or industrial operation and not for the enhancement of real property shall be deemed to be personal property, including, without limitation, oil and gas distribution and transmission pipelines, gathering system pipelines, flow lines, process lines, and related water pipeline collection, transportation, and distribution systems. Structures and other buildings installed on an easement, right-of-way, or leasehold that are not specifically referenced in this subsection (11) shall be deemed to be improvements pursuant to subsection (6.3) of this section.
  12. "Political subdivision" means any entity of government authorized by law to impose ad valorem taxes on taxable property located within its territorial limits.

    (12.1) Repealed.

    (12.3) and (12.4) Repealed.

    (12.5) "Professional forester" means any person who has received a bachelor's or higher degree from an accredited school of forestry.

  13. "Property" means both real and personal property.

    (13.2) "Qualified organization" means a qualified organization as defined in section 170 (h)(3) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended.

    (13.5) "Ranch" means a parcel of land which is used for grazing livestock for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit. For the purposes of this subsection (13.5), "livestock" means domestic animals which are used for food for human or animal consumption, breeding, draft, or profit.

  14. "Real property" means:
    1. All lands or interests in lands to which title or the right of title has been acquired from the government of the United States or from sovereign authority ratified by treaties entered into by the United States, or from the state;
    2. All mines, quarries, and minerals in and under the land, and all rights and privileges thereunto appertaining; and
    3. Improvements.

    (14.3) "Residential improvements" means a building, or that portion of a building, designed for use predominantly as a place of residency by a person, a family, or families. The term includes buildings, structures, fixtures, fences, amenities, and water rights that are an integral part of the residential use. The term also includes a manufactured home as defined in subsection (7.8) of this section, a mobile home as defined in subsection (8) of this section, and a modular home as defined in subsection (8.3) of this section.

      1. (14.4) (a) (I) "Residential land" means a parcel of land upon which residential improvements are located. The term also includes:
        1. Land upon which residential improvements were destroyed by natural cause after the date of the last assessment as established in section 39-1-104 (10.2);
        2. Two acres or less of land on which a residential improvement is located where the improvement is not integral to an agricultural operation conducted on such land; and
        3. A parcel of land without a residential improvement located thereon, if the parcel is contiguous to a parcel of residential land that has identical ownership based on the record title and contains a related improvement that is essential to the use of the residential improvement located on the identically owned contiguous residential land.
      2. "Residential land" does not include any portion of the land that is used for any purpose that would cause the land to be otherwise classified, except as provided for in section 39-1-103 (10.5).
      3. As used in this subsection (14.4):
        1. "Contiguous" means that the parcels physically touch; except that contiguity is not interrupted by an intervening local street, alley, or common element in a common-interest community.
        2. "Related improvement" means a driveway, parking space, or improvement other than a building, or that portion of a building designed for use predominantly as a place of residency by a person, a family, or families.
      1. Notwithstanding section 39-1-103 (5)(c) and except as provided in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b), when residential improvements are destroyed, demolished, or relocated as a result of a natural cause on or after January 1, 2010, that, were it not for their destruction, demolition, or relocation due to such natural cause, would have qualified the land upon which the improvements were located as residential land for the following property tax year, the residential land classification shall remain in place for the year of destruction, demolition, or relocation and the two subsequent property tax years. The residential land classification may remain in place for additional subsequent property tax years, not to exceed a total of five subsequent property tax years, if the assessor determines there is evidence the owner intends to rebuild or locate a residential improvement on the land. For purposes of this determination, the assessor may consider, but shall not be limited to considering, a building permit or other land development permit for the land, construction plans for such residential improvement, efforts by the owner to obtain financing for a residential improvement, or ongoing efforts to settle an insurance claim related to the destruction, demolition, or relocation of the residential improvement due to a natural cause.
      2. The residential land classification of the land described in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b) shall change according to current use if:
        1. A new residential improvement or part of a new residential improvement is not constructed or placed on the land in accordance with applicable land use regulations prior to the January 1 after the period described in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b), unless the property owner provides documentary evidence to the assessor that during such period a good-faith effort was made to construct or place a new or part of a new residential improvement on the land but that additional time is necessary;
        2. The assessor determines that the classification at the time of destruction, demolition, or relocation as a result of a natural cause was erroneous; or
        3. A change of use has occurred. For purposes of this sub-subparagraph (C), a change of use shall not include the temporary loss of the residential use due to the destruction, demolition, or relocation as a result of a natural cause of the residential improvement.
      1. Notwithstanding section 39-1-103 (5)(c) and except as provided in subsection (14.4)(c)(II) of this section, when residential improvements are destroyed, demolished, or relocated on or after January 1, 2018, that, were it not for their destruction, demolition, or relocation, would have qualified the land upon which the improvements were located as residential land for the following property tax year, the residential land classification shall remain in place for the year of destruction, demolition, or relocation and one subsequent property tax year if the assessor determines there is evidence that the owner intends to rebuild or locate a residential improvement on the land. For purposes of this determination, the assessor may consider, but is not limited to considering, a building permit or other land development permit for the land, construction plans for such residential improvement, or efforts by the owner to obtain financing for a residential improvement.
      2. The residential land classification of the land described in subsection (14.4)(c)(I) of this section shall change according to current use if:
        1. A new residential improvement or part of a new residential improvement is not constructed or placed on the land in accordance with applicable land use regulations prior to the January 1 after the period described in subsection (14.4)(c)(I) of this section;
        2. The assessor determines that the classification of the land at the time of the destruction, demolition, or relocation was erroneous; or
        3. A change of use has occurred. For purposes of this subsection (14.4)(c)(II)(C), a change of use shall not include the temporary loss of the residential use due to the destruction, demolition, or relocation of the residential improvement.

    (14.5) "Residential real property" means residential land and residential improvements but does not include hotels and motels as defined in subsection (5.5) of this section.

  15. Repealed.

    1. (15.5) (a) "School" means:
      1. An educational institution having a curriculum comparable to that of a publicly supported elementary or secondary school or college, or any combination thereof, and requiring daily attendance; or
      2. An institution that is licensed as a child care center pursuant to article 6 of title 26, C.R.S., that is:
        1. Operated by and as an integral part of a not-for-profit educational institution that meets the requirements of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a); or
        2. A not-for-profit institution that offers an educational program for not more than six hours per day and that employs educators trained in preschool through eighth grade educational instruction and is licensed by the appropriate state agency and that is not otherwise qualified as a school under this paragraph (a) or as a religious institution.
    2. "School" includes any educational institution that meets the requirements set forth in subparagraph (I) or (II) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (15.5), even if such educational institution maintains hours of operation in excess of the minimum hour requirements of section 22-32-109 (1)(n)(I), C.R.S.
  16. "Taxable property" means all property, real and personal, not expressly exempted from taxation by law.
  17. "Treasurer" means the elected treasurer of a county or his or her appointed successor, and, in the case of the city and county of Denver, such equivalent officer as may be provided by its charter, in the case of the city and county of Broomfield, such equivalent officer as may be provided by its charter or code, and in the case of any home rule county, the treasurer or such equivalent officer as provided by its charter.
  18. "Works of art" means those items of personal property that are original creations of visual art, including, but not limited to:
    1. Sculpture, in any material or combination of materials, whether in the round, bas-relief, high relief, mobile, fountain, kinetic, or electronic;
    2. Paintings or drawings;
    3. Mosaics;
    4. Photographs;
    5. Crafts made from clay, fiber and textiles, wood, metal, plastics, or any other material, or any combination thereof;
    6. Calligraphy;
    7. Mixed media composed of any combination of forms or media; or
    8. Unique architectural embellishments.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 674, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-1. L. 65: p. 1095, § 1. L. 67: p. 945, § 1. L. 70: p. 379, § 8. L. 73: p. 237, § 17. L. 75: (8) repealed, p. 1473, § 30, effective July 18. L. 77: (7.5), (12.3), and (12.4) added, p. 1728, § 1, effective June 20; (8) RC&RE, p. 1740, § 1, effective January 1, 1978. L. 78: (12.1) added, p. 467, § 1, effective July 1. L. 79: (12.1) amended, p. 1400, § 1, effective March 13; (12.1)(a) amended, p. 1059, § 9, effective June 20; (12.1) repealed, p. 1456, § 4, effective July 1, 1981. L. 80: (18) added, p. 711, § 1, effective April 16. L. 81: (12.1)(d) R&RE, p. 1872, § 4, effective June 29; (12.1)(a)(II) amended, § 5, effective July 1. L. 83: (15) repealed, p. 1485, § 11, effective April 22; (1.1), (1.3), (1.6), (3.5), (5.5), (7.2), (7.8), (13.5), and (14.3) to (14.5) added, (5) repealed, and (12.3)(b) amended, pp. 1486, 1488, §§ 1, 6, 4, effective June 1. L. 84: (7.2) amended, p. 983, § 1, effective May 8. L. 85: IP(7.2) amended and (7.9) added, pp. 1215, 1210, §§ 1, 2, effective May 9. L. 87: (1.3) amended, p. 1382, § 1, effective May 8; (7.5), (12.3), and (12.4) repealed, p. 1304, § 1, effective May 20. L. 88: (4) and (11) amended and (12.1) repealed, pp. 1269, 1275, §§ 4, 14, effective May 29. L. 89: (15.5) added, p. 1482, § 3, effective April 23. L. 90: (1.6)(a) amended, (4.3) to (4.6) and (12.5) added, p. 1706, § 1, effective April 16; (9) amended, p. 450, § 26, effective April 18; (1.6)(a) and (13.5) amended and (8.5) added, pp. 1695, 1703, 1701, §§ 16, 37, 33, effective June 9. L. 91: IP(7.2) amended, p. 1980, § 1, effective April 20; (8) amended, p. 1394, § 2, effective April 27. L. 92: (4) amended, p. 2216, § 3, effective June 2. L. 94: (8) and (14.3) amended, p. 2568, § 86, effective January 1, 1995. L. 95: IP(1.6)(a) amended and (1.6)(a)(III), (3.2), (8.7), and (13.2) added, pp. 173, 174, §§ 1, 2, effective April 7. L. 97: (1.1) and (1.6) amended, p. 509, § 1, effective April 24. L. 98: (11) amended, p. 1276, § 1, effective June 1. L. 99: (15.5) amended, p. 1299, § 1, effective June 3. L. 2000: (15.5)(a)(II) amended, p. 1499, § 1, effective August 2. L. 2001: (2) and (17) amended, p. 268, § 14, effective November 15. L. 2002: (5.5) amended, p. 1939, § 1, effective August 7; (2.5), (3.1), (5.6), and (7.1) added, (5.5)(a)(IV) repealed, and (14.4) amended, pp. 1671, 1673, §§ 1, 3, effective January 1, 2003. L. 2004: (1.6)(a)(I) amended, p. 1208, § 86, effective August 4. L. 2008: (14.3) amended, p. 1914, § 129, effective August 5. L. 2009: (7.7) and (8.3) added and (7.8), (8), and (14.3) amended, (SB-040), ch. 9, p. 70, § 12, effective July 1; (8.5) amended, (SB 09-042), ch. 176, p. 779, § 1, effective August 5. L. 2010: (1.1) amended, (SB 10-177), ch. 392, p. 1861, § 1, effective August 11; (1.6)(a)(III) amended, (HB 10-1197), ch. 175, p. 634, § 1, effective August 11; (6.3) and (6.8) added and (7) and (11) amended, (HB10-1267), ch. 425, p. 2198, § 1, effective August 11. L. 2011: (8.4) added and (14.4) amended, (HB 11-1042), ch. 138, p. 479, § 1, effective May 4; (1.6)(d) added, (HB 11-1043), ch. 266, p. 1213, § 23, effective July 1; (1.6)(a)(I) and (14.4) amended, (HB 11-1146), ch. 166, p. 571, § 1, effective January 1, 2012. L. 2013: (14.4)(a) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1699, § 116, effective August 7. L. 2014: (8.5) amended, (HB 14-1349), ch. 230, p. 854, § 4, effective May 17; (1.6)(b) amended, (SB 14-043), ch. 53, p. 248, § 1, effective August 6. L. 2016: (14.4)(b)(II)(A) amended, (SB 16-012), ch. 66, p. 169, § 1, effective April 5. L. 2017: IP, (1.1), and (1.3) amended, (SB 17-302), ch. 311, p. 1675, § 1, effective June 2. L. 2018: (14.4)(c) added, (HB 18-1283), ch. 270, p. 1665, § 1, effective August 8. L. 2019: (5.5)(c)(VIII) amended, (HB 19-1172), ch. 136, p. 1727, § 249, effective October 1. L. 2020: (17) amended, (HB 20-1077), ch. 80, p. 324, § 5, effective September 14. L. 2021: (3.7) added, (HB 21-1312), ch. 299, p. 1791, § 3, effective July 1; (14.4)(a) amended, (HB 21-1061), ch. 63, p. 252, § 1, effective September 7.

Editor's note:

  1. Amendments to subsection (1.6)(a) by House Bill 90-1229 harmonized with House Bill 90-1018.
  2. Amendments to subsection (14.4) by House Bill 11-1042 and House Bill 11-1146 were harmonized, effective January 1, 2012.

Cross references: (1) For the creation of the property tax administrator, see § 39-2-101.

(2) For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1312, see section 1 of chapter 299, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

ANNOTATION

Analysis

I. PERSONAL PROPERTY.

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.

Membership or contract in Associated Press is "personal property". Bd. of Comm'rs v. Rocky Mt. News Printing Co., 15 Colo. App. 189, 61 P. 494 (1900).

Signs that can easily be removed and kitchen and bath displays of a temporary nature are not fixtures and are therefore personal property. Also, despite being affixed to or permanently incorporated into a building, pneumatic and sensormatic systems were primarily tied to a business and therefore were not fixtures and were properly classified as personal property. Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Pueblo County Bd. of Comm'rs, 50 P.3d 916 (Colo. App. 2002).

II. PROPERTY.

Bank deposits not "property" of bank but are credits belonging to depositors. Murray v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 67 Colo. 14, 185 P. 262 (1919).

III. REAL PROPERTY.

To determine the proper classification of land for assessment, the trial court must make findings of fact regarding conflicting evidence. C.A. Staack v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 802 P.2d 1191 (Colo. App. 1990).

Primary factor to be considered in determining proper classification of property for property tax purposes is the actual use of the property on the relevant assessment date. Farny v. Bd. of Equaliz., 985 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1999); Hogan v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2018 COA 86 , 459 P.3d 629, aff'd on other grounds sub nom. Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

If a property owner's use of the parcel on the assessment date satisfies the requirements for residential classification, then it is irrelevant if the owner has future plans to sell the parcel or make nonresidential use of it. Hogan v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2018 COA 86 , 459 P.3d 629, aff'd on other grounds sub nom. Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

In determining a parcel's proper classification for the present assessment year, the board of assessment appeals may not reject a final decision previously rendered by an appropriate tribunal as to the parcel's use during a previous tax year and re-visit that issue. However, a decision with respect to a previous tax year is not binding with respect to the issues presented in a protest of the assessment for a later year. Von Hagen v. Bd. of Equaliz., 948 P.2d 92 (Colo. App. 1997).

The taxpayer has the burden of proof to show any qualifying ranching or farming uses of land in support of a claim for agricultural classification. Palmer v. Bd. of Equaliz., 957 P.2d 348 (Colo. App. 1998); Hepp v. Boulder County Assessor, 113 P.3d 1268 (Colo. App. 2005).

Property properly classified as nonagricultural residential property. A 35-acre parcel that was subject to a perpetual conservation easement and included a residence was properly classified as residential. Under subsection (1.6)(a)(III), a parcel that includes a residential improvement is only agricultural based on a perpetual conservation easement if it consists of at least 80 acres. The parcel also did not qualify for agricultural classification based on farming use under subsection (1.6)(a)(I) because the owner did not establish three years of agricultural use and did not qualify for agricultural classification based on forestry use under subsection (1.6)(a)(II) because it was smaller than 40 acres. Andrew v. Teller County Bd. of Equaliz., 2012 COA 104 , 284 P.3d 172.

To qualify as "agricultural land" under subsection (1.6), the land must (1) be presently used as a farm or ranch; (2) have been so used during the two-year period prior to the assessment; (3) have been classified or eligible for classification as agricultural land during the 10 years preceding the assessment year; and (4) continue to have actual agricultural use. Boulder County Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Constr. Co., 830 P.2d 975 (Colo. 1992).

Second element of test applied in Aberdeen Inv'rs v. Adams County, 240 P.3d 398 (Colo. App. 2009).

Definition of "agricultural land" does not require that the use of the residential improvements be related to the agricultural use of the land. C.A. Staack v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 802 P.2d 1191 (Colo. App. 1990).

Definition of "agricultural land" does not differentiate between a lessee's primary purpose in using the land and the landowner's primary purpose in acquiring and maintaining ownership of the land, nor does the landowner need to profit or intend to profit from agricultural operations on the land conducted by the owner's lessees. Boulder Cty. Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Const. Co., 830 P.2d 975 (Colo. 1992).

Lessees' use of property as a ranch for the primary purpose of making a profit was the determinative factor in qualifying property as agricultural land. Boulder Cty. Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Const. Co., 830 P.2d 975 (Colo. 1992).

Subsections (1.6) and (13.5) require that, in order to qualify for agricultural tax treatment, the taxpayer must prove that actual grazing of the parcel took place in the applicable tax year unless the reason the land was not grazed related to a conservation practice or unless the land in question is part of a larger agricultural unit on which grazing or conservation practices have occurred during the relevant tax years. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Clarke, 921 P.2d 717 (Colo. 1996).

Whether a party's use constitutes agricultural use is primarily a factual question, but an interpretation of what the legislature intended when it required agricultural use in order for the property to be classified as agricultural for tax purposes is a question of law for the courts to decide. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Clarke, 921 P.2d 717 (Colo. 1996).

Initial question that the board of assessment appeals must consider in reviewing a county assessor's classification of land as agricultural is whether it is a segregated parcel that should be treated as a single unit or whether it is part of an integrated larger parcel. This is a factual determination, controlled by whether the land is sufficiently contiguous to and connected by use with other land to qualify it as part of a large unit or whether it is a parcel segregated by geography or type of use from the balance of the unit. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Clarke, 921 P.2d 717 (Colo. 1996).

The plain meaning of the phrase "used for grazing" is that livestock actually graze on the land. There must be actual grazing on the parcel during each relevant tax year to qualify for agricultural classification unless the land is subject to non-use for conservation purposes. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Clarke, 921 P.2d 717 (Colo. 1996).

In order for land that is not used for grazing to qualify for conservation, the taxpayer must prove that the non-use was reasonably related to the overall grazing operation. A professionally prepared conservation plan is not required. The non-use must be both purposeful and an integral part of the grazing operation. Neglect by the landowner or lessee or basic unsuitability of the land for grazing will not suffice. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Clarke, 921 P.2d 717 ( Colo. 1996 ); Johnston v. Park County Bd. of Equaliz., 979 P.2d 578 (Colo. App. 1999).

Under subsection (1.6)(a)(I), land can only qualify as agricultural land by virtue of being "in the process of being restored through conservation practices" if it has been subjected to a federally established conservation reserve program or a conservation plan approved by an appropriate conservation district as specified in that subsection. Hepp v. Boulder County Assessor, 113 P.3d 1268 (Colo. App. 2005).

There is no indication in the text that the landowner must actually profit or intend to profit from agricultural operations on the land conducted by the owner's lessees. Boulder Cty. Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Const. Co., 830 P.2d 975 (Colo. 1992).

Definition of "ranch" does not require that the owner of the land own the livestock grazing on his land to classify the land as agricultural. The owner may lease the land for grazing, and, if such use is for the primary purpose of obtaining a monetary profit from the grazing activity, it constitutes an agricultural use. C.A. Staack v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 802 P.2d 1191 (Colo. App. 1990); Boulder Cty. Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Const. Co., 830 P.2d 975 ( Colo. 1992 ).

So long as a parcel of land is used for grazing livestock for profit, it qualifies as a "ranch", even if the owner of the property is not the one who is conducting the grazing operation. Estes v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 805 P.2d 1174 (Colo. App. 1990).

"Trespass grazing" does not meet the statutory requirements for agricultural classification as a matter of law. In interpreting subsections (1.6)(a)(I) and (13.5), a court must give appropriate deference to provisions of the property tax administrator's reference manuals that expressly provide that "trespass grazing" is an insufficient basis for finding that land is "agricultural land". Besch v. Jefferson County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 20 P.3d 1195 (Colo. App. 2000).

The 10-year requirement for agricultural land must be interpreted to mean that the land was classified, or eligible for classification, as agricultural land at some time during the preceding 10 years, not for the whole of that period. Hence, if a property's agricultural use ceases, that property may, nevertheless, be again classified as agricultural land if it is used for such purpose for three years within 10 years from the date of the original abandonment of that use. Von Hagen v. Bd. of Equaliz., 948 P.2d 92 (Colo. App. 1997).

Owner's intentions for future use of his land may not be considered in classifying the property as "agricultural land". C.A. Staack v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 802 P.2d 1191 (Colo. App. 1990).

Focus of the statutory definition of agricultural land is clearly on present and past surface use of the land without regard to any future intent on the part of the owner to develop the land for nonagricultural purposes. Boulder Cty. Bd. of Equaliz. v. M.D.C. Const. Co., 830 P.2d 975 (Colo. 1992).

Land was held not to be "agricultural land" because the primary use of the land during the three years in question was not for farming with the intent to obtain a profit. Arapahoe P'ship v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 813 P.2d 766 (Colo. App. 1990).

The two-year requirement that land be used as a farm or ranch does not require such use be continuous during the prior two years; the plain language of the statute and legislative intent only require that the land be used as such at some point during both of the prior two tax years to the assessment. Aberdeen Inv'rs v. Adams County, 240 P.3d 398 (Colo. App. 2009).

In determining whether the two-year requirement that land be used as a farm or ranch was met, use that begins mid-year suffices. Although January 1 is the relevant date for classification purposes, use that began in July counts towards the two-year use requirement. Aberdeen Inv'rs v. Adams County, 240 P.3d 398 (Colo. App. 2009).

Parcel of land did not qualify as agricultural land for ad valorem tax purposes under the first criterion of subsection (1.6). Subsection (1.6) requires that the land be used as a farm or ranch currently and for the previous two years. It is the actual use during the relevant time period that is dispositive. In 2006, the actual use of the subject land was not as a farm, or as part of a farm, but as a construction site. C.P. Bedrock, LLC v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 259 P.3d 514 (Colo. App. 2011).

Parcel of land did not qualify as being in the process of being restored through conservation practices because it did not satisfy the condition of the second criterion in subsection (1.6) that the parcel "has been placed in a conservation reserve program". Under subsection (1.6) the appropriate government agency must have at least approved the owner or lessee's application for inclusion in the conservation reserve program at some point before the end of the tax year. The government agencies in question did not approve the application of the farmer lessee of the taxpayer to add the subject land to the conservation program until 2007. Because the subject land was not placed in the conservation program in 2006, the land was not "being restored through conservation practices" under subsection (1.6)(a)(I) during the relevant period. C.P. Bedrock, LLC v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 259 P.3d 514 (Colo. App. 2011).

Parcel of land also did not meet the alternative condition of being subject to "a conservation plan approved by the appropriate conservation district . . . for up to a period of ten crop years". There was effectively no conservation plan covering the subject land for 2006 or the years prior. Accordingly, the subject land did not qualify as "agricultural land" under subsection (1.6)(a)(I) by virtue of being "in the process of being restored through conservation practices". Therefore, taxpayer cannot receive favorable tax treatment for the subject land for the 2007 and 2008 tax years on this basis. C.P. Bedrock, LLC v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 259 P.3d 514 (Colo. App. 2011).

Where the administrative agency and administrative law judge responsible for administering the tax code disagree on the interpretation of a statute, the property tax administrator's interpretation is not entitled to judicial deference if it was not embodied in the assessor's reference library and is inconsistent with the statutory text. Moreover, the board of assessment appeals' interpretation deserves greater deference where its interpretation is consistent with its previous opinions. Aberdeen Investors v. Adams County, 240 P.3d 398 (Colo. App. 2009).

Definition of "farm" does not include land used for greenhouses, where the agricultural products produced in the greenhouses do not originate from the land's productivity. Accordingly, such land may not be classified and valued as agricultural land for property tax purposes. Welby Gardens Co. v. Adams County Bd. of Equaliz., 56 P.3d 1121 (Colo. App. 2002), aff'd, 71 P.3d 992 ( Colo. 2003 ).

Subsection (1.6)(b) defines "other agricultural property" generally and does not provide specific guidance on how it should be valued. A court, therefore, should defer to the administrative interpretations of the statute. Jefferson County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. S.T. Spano Greenhouses, Inc., 155 P.3d 422 (Colo. App. 2006).

The provisions of the assessor's reference library interpreting subsection (1.6)(b) require the land component of other agricultural property to be valued based on comparable sales of other agricultural land that is as similar as possible to the subject land in size, location, and present use. Jefferson County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. S.T. Spano Greenhouses, Inc., 155 P.3d 422 (Colo. App. 2006).

The grazing and boarding of "pleasure horses" does not qualify as a "ranching" use. Only the grazing of "livestock" for the purpose of obtaining a monetary profit constitutes a "ranching" use, and horses may constitute "livestock" only if they are used for food or for human or animal consumption, breeding, draft, or profit. The taxpayer's profit motive alone in boarding and grazing horses on his land is insufficient. Palmer v. Bd. of Equaliz., 957 P.2d 348 (Colo. App. 1998).

Production of eggs in self-contained unit within which the livestock does not touch the ground where the eggs are sold for monetary profit as an agricultural product falls under the statutory definition of a farm, and the eggs fall under the definition of agricultural products. Morning Fresh Farms v. Bd. of Equaliz., 794 P.2d 1073 (Colo. 1990).

Reservoir rights used upon land are taxable as real estate like improvements upon the land on which they are applied. Antero & Lost Park Reservoir Co. v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 65 Colo. 375, 177 P. 148 (1918).

Water rights are included within and constitute a part of the real estate upon which the water is applied. Kendrick v. Twin Lakes Reservoir Co., 58 Colo. 281, 144 P. 884 (1914).

Mineral reservation not real property. A right to prospect for and to remove minerals if found is not a reservation of an estate in the real property involved, but a mere license, subject to revocation before its exercise by the owner of the fee simple estate. Radke v. Union P.R.R., 138 Colo. 189 , 334 P.2d 1077 (1959).

Waterworks system deemed realty. Water mains, pipes, and hydrants laid in the public streets and alleys of a city, and the machinery connected therewith and necessary to the operation of a waterworks plant, are realty for the purpose of taxation. Colo. Fuel & Iron Co. v. Pueblo Water Co., 11 Colo. App. 352, 53 P. 232 (1898).

In Colorado, all real property, except that which is expressly exempted by law, is subject to ad valorem taxation. Mesa Verde Co. v. Montezuma County Bd. of Equaliz., 898 P.2d 1 (Colo. 1995).

Development rights are property interests subject to taxation. Vill. at Treehouse v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2014 COA 6 , 321 P.3d 624.

Lessee of real property is liable for property tax when the lessee is, for all practical purposes, the owner of the real property. When the terms of a lease require the lessee to construct, maintain, and insure an aircraft hangar facility on the leased land at its own expense and give lessee the exclusive right to possess, use, operate, receive revenue from, claim tax advantages from, and, with authorization, assign or transfer the hangar facility, the lessee was properly assessed property tax for its ownership of the hangar facility. Rare Air Ltd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2019 COA 134 , 459 P.3d 547.

Possessory interest of concessionaire on national park land owned by the United States was an "interest in land" and thus constituted "real property" as defined in this section. Mesa Verde Co. v. Montezuma County Bd. of Equaliz., 898 P.2d 1 (Colo. 1995).

Possessory interests in land constitute real property as defined in subsection (14) and therefore also constitute taxable property as defined in subsection (16). Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo. 2001).

Reservoir dam not "improvement". A reservoir dam is not subject to taxation as realty as it is not an improvement upon the land on which it is situated. Antero & Lost Park Reservoir Co. v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 65 Colo. 375, 177 P. 148 (1918).

Golf club membership not an "interest in land". Rather, based on the terms of the membership agreement, the membership was a license. Roaring Fork Club v. Pitkin Bd. of Equaliz., 2013 COA 167 , 342 P.3d 467.

Definition of "residential land" contains no prescribed limit on the amount of acreage that may be so classified. Rather, the size of a residential tract must be determined on a case-by-case basis according to the amount of acreage which is being used as a unit in conjunction with the residential improvements on each particular property. Gyurman v. Weld County Bd. of Equaliz., 851 P.2d 307 (Colo. App. 1993); Farny v. Bd. of Equaliz., 985 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1999).

Based on a reading of the constitutional definition of residential real property and this section together, residential land must contain a residential dwelling unit and be used as a unit in conjunction with the residential improvements on the residential land. Fifield v. Pitkin County Bd. of Comm'rs, 2012 COA 197 , 292 P.3d 1207.

Common ownership requires identical parties. Contiguous parcels are under common ownership for purposes of qualifying all of the parcels as residential land under subsection (14.4) only if identical parties, and not merely overlapping parties, hold record title to each contiguous parcel. Lannie v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Eagle County, 2020 COA 77 , 471 P.3d 1207.

For purposes of subsection (14.4)(a), a parcel that does not include a residential improvement is "used as a unit" with a contiguous residential parcel under common ownership if the parcels are used as though they are a greater, single parcel of land and the landowner does not use the parcel for nonresidential property uses. Sandra K. Morrison Trust v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2020 COA 74 , 465 P.3d 582.

The plain meaning of "integral" in subsection (14.4)(a) is that parts are formed as a unit, not that all parts are necessary or essential. Hogan v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2018 COA 86 , 459 P.3d 629, aff'd sub nom. Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

The definition of "residential land" in subsection (14.4)(a) unambiguously means that two parcels must actually touch to be contiguous. Bringle Family Trust v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2018 COA 64 , 459 P.3d 615; Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

The definition of "contiguous" in subsection (14.4)(a) refers only to parcels of land that physically touch. Thus, residential land includes physically touching parcels of land upon which residential improvements are located. Therefore, for a multi-parcel assemblage to satisfy the contiguity requirement, a parcel of land must physically touch another parcel containing a residential improvement. Ziegler v. Park County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2020 CO 13, 457 P.3d 584.

Definition of residential land does not require active use of contiguous parcels. Hogan v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2018 COA 86 , 459 P.3d 629, aff'd sub nom. Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

Land on a parcel contiguous to another commonly owned parcel with a residential dwelling unit need only be used as a unit in conjunction with that residential dwelling unit or associated residential improvement to qualify as residential land. Fifield v. Pitkin County Bd. of Comm'rs, 2012 COA 197 , 292 P.3d 1207.

A residential improvement is not needed on each contiguous and commonly owned parcel of land for that parcel to be "used as a unit". Ziegler v. Park County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2020 CO 13, 457 P.3d 584.

Subsection (14)(a) requires a property owner to use contiguous residential and vacant parcels together as a collective unit of property for only residential purposes to satisfy the "used as a unit" requirement. The use of contiguous vacant parcels does not have to be essential to the enjoyment or use of the residential property. Ziegler v. Park County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 2020 CO 13, 457 P.3d 584.

Property tax assessors must rely on county records when deciding whether properties are held under common ownership for purposes of subsection (14.4). Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

Subsection (14.4) only requires that landowners use a collective unit of property composed of multiple, individual parcels, together with the residential improvements located on that collective unit. Nothing in the statute mandates that residential improvements exist on each parcel to be classified as residential land. Mook v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Summit, 2020 CO 12, 457 P.3d 568.

A residential dwelling must be situated upon a lot zoned for residential use in order for the lot to qualify as "residential real property" eligible for the percentage ratio of valuation for assessment as determined in accordance with Colo. Const., art. X, § 3(1)(b). Vail Assocs., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 765 P.2d 593 (Colo. App. 1988).

Definition of "residential improvement" requires that a structure be designed for use predominantly as a residence rather than simply "actually used" as a residence. Mission Viejo v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994).

For purposes of "residential improvements," the phrase "designed for use" means that the building at the relevant time is devoted to or intended for actual use predominantly as a place of residence. Mission Viejo Co. v. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994); Manor Vail Condominium Ass'n v. Bd. of Equaliz., 956 P.2d 654 (Colo. App. 1998); Farny v. Bd. of Equaliz., 985 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1999).

Small structure built on 320-acre parcel qualified for residential classification since taxpayers actually used structure predominantly as a place of residence and it was at least minimally suitable for such residential purposes. Farny v. Bd. of Equaliz., 985 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1999).

Restaurant and meeting rooms were not residential improvements. Manor Vail Condominium Ass'n v. Bd. of Equaliz., 956 P.2d 654 (Colo. App. 1998).

Building originally designed as a residence could be reclassified based on actual use. Fact that building was originally designed as residence did not conclusively require classification as a residential property under this section. Mission Viejo v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994).

Plaintiff, a quasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state, was not a "person" under subsection (9) and did not have standing to seek damages pursuant to § 39-10-115 (3). Bear Creek Water & Sanitation Dist. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Jefferson County, 902 P.2d 904 (Colo. App. 1995).

Vacant parcel of land did not qualify for residential classification even though it was zoned for residential use, adjacent to the taxpayer's residence, and used in conjunction with the residence as part of the taxpayer's backyard because the adjacent residential parcel was owned by the taxpayer's wife, not the taxpayer, and the vacant parcel did not have a residential dwelling unit on it. Sullivan v. Bd. of Equaliz., 971 P.2d 675 (Colo. App. 1998).

Residential classification upheld for second home that was sometimes rented out on a short-term basis. The board of assessment appeals' classification of the home as residential had a reasonable basis in law and was supported by substantial evidence in the record where the property: was designed for use as a residence and built for personal use; the owners' intent was to use the property as a second residence and an inheritance for their sons; short-term rentals were allowed primarily to offset expenses and share the outdoors experience with visitors rather than to profit; most rental activity occurred only during the summer; and the owners themselves regularly used the property. O'Neil v. Conejos County Bd. of Comm'rs, 2017 COA 30 , 395 P.3d 1185.

Applied in Del Mesa Farms v. Bd. of Equaliz., 656 P.2d 661 (Colo. App. 1998).

39-1-103. Actual value determined - when.

  1. The valuation for assessment of producing mines and nonproducing mining claims shall be determined as provided in article 6 of this title.
  2. The valuation for assessment of leaseholds and lands producing oil or gas shall be determined as provided in article 7 of this title.
  3. The actual value for property tax purposes of the operating property and plant of all public utilities doing business in this state shall be determined by the administrator, as provided in article 4 of this title.
    1. Repealed.
    2. The valuation for assessment of mobile homes shall be determined as provided in section 39-5-203.
    1. All real and personal property shall be appraised and the actual value thereof for property tax purposes determined by the assessor of the county wherein such property is located. The actual value of such property, other than agricultural lands exclusive of building improvements thereon and other than residential real property and other than producing mines and lands or leaseholds producing oil or gas, shall be that value determined by appropriate consideration of the cost approach, the market approach, and the income approach to appraisal. The assessor shall consider and document all elements of such approaches that are applicable prior to a determination of actual value. The actual value reflects the value of the fee simple estate. Despite any orders of the state board of equalization, no assessor shall arbitrarily increase the valuations for assessment of all parcels represented within the abstract of a county or within a class or subclass of parcels on that abstract by a common multiple in response to the order of said board. If an assessor is required, pursuant to the order of said board, to increase or decrease valuations for assessment, such changes shall be made only upon individual valuations for assessment of each and every parcel, using each of the approaches to appraisal specified in this subsection (5)(a), if applicable. The actual value of agricultural lands, exclusive of building improvements thereon, shall be determined by consideration of the earning or productive capacity of such lands during a reasonable period of time, capitalized at a rate of thirteen percent. Land that is valued as agricultural and that becomes subject to a perpetual conservation easement shall continue to be valued as agricultural notwithstanding its dedication for conservation purposes; except that, if any portion of such land is actually used for nonagricultural commercial or nonagricultural residential purposes, that portion shall be valued according to such use. Nothing in this subsection (5) shall be construed to require or permit the reclassification of agricultural land or improvements, including residential property, due solely to subjecting the land to a perpetual conservation easement. The actual value of residential real- property shall be determined solely by consideration of the market approach to appraisal. A gross rent multiplier may be considered as a unit of comparison within the market approach to appraisal. The valuation for assessment of producing mines and of lands or leaseholds producing oil or gas shall be determined pursuant to articles 6 and 7 of this title 39.
    2. If, having considered the three approaches prescribed in paragraph (a) of this subsection (5), at the sole discretion of the assessor the use of the three approaches to value cannot accurately determine the actual value of any parcel of taxable property, or in the opinion of the assessor the application of the three approaches to value does not result in uniform, just, and equalized valuation, then the actual value thereof shall be determined by comparison of the surface use of such property with a similar surface use.
    3. Except as provided in section 39-1-102 (14.4)(b) or 39-1-102 (14.4)(c) and in subsections (5)(e) and (5)(f) of this section, once any property is classified for property tax purposes, it shall remain so classified until such time as its actual use changes or the assessor discovers that the classification is erroneous. The property owner shall endeavor to comply with the reasonable requests of the assessor to supply information which cannot be ascertained independently but which is necessary to determine actual use and properly classify the property when the assessor has evidence that there has been a change in the use of the property. Failure to supply such information shall not be the sole reason for reclassifying the property. Any such request for such information shall be accompanied by a notice that states that failure on the part of the property owner to supply such information will not be used as the sole reason for reclassifying the property in question. Subject to the availability of funds under the assessor's budget for such purpose, no later than May 1 of each year, the assessor shall inform each person whose property has been reclassified from agricultural land to any other classification of property of the reasons for such reclassification including, but not limited to, the basis for the determination that the actual use of the property has changed or that the classification of such property is erroneous.
    4. If a parcel of land is classified as agricultural land as defined in section 39-1-102 (1.6)(a)(III) and the perpetual conservation easement is terminated, violated, or substantially modified so that the easement is no longer granted exclusively for conservation purposes, the assessor may reassess the land retroactively for a period of seven years and the additional taxes, if any, that would have been levied on the land during the seven year period prior to the termination, violation, or modification shall become due.
      1. Except as provided in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (e) and in paragraph (f) of this subsection (5), if a parcel of land is classified as agricultural land as defined in section 39-1-102 (1.6) and the productivity of such parcel of land is destroyed by a natural cause on or after January 1, 2012, so that, were it not for the destruction of the productivity of the land by a natural cause, the land would have qualified as agricultural land for the following property tax year, the agricultural land classification shall remain in place for the year of destruction and the four subsequent property tax years so long as the assessor receives evidence from the owner that the owner is in the process of rehabilitating the productivity of the land for agricultural use. Such evidence includes, but is not limited to, removing debris, removing contaminants, restoring fences and agricultural structures, reseeding, providing water for livestock, or contouring the land suitable for agricultural use.
      2. The agricultural land classification of the land described in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (e) must change according to current use if:
        1. The productivity of the land is not rehabilitated for agricultural use prior to the January 1 after the period described in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (e), unless the property owner provides documentary evidence to the assessor that during such period a good-faith effort was made to rehabilitate the productivity of the land for agricultural use but that additional time is necessary;
        2. The assessor determines that the classification at the time of destruction of the productivity of the land as a result of a natural cause was erroneous; or
        3. A change of use has occurred. For purposes of this sub-subparagraph (C), a change of use does not include the temporary loss of agricultural classification of the land as a result of the destruction of the productivity of the land by a natural cause.
      1. Except as provided in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (f), if a parcel of land is classified as agricultural land as defined in section 39-1-102 (1.6)(a)(II) and the productivity of the parcel of land is destroyed by a natural cause on or after January 1, 2012, so that, were it not for the destruction of the productivity of the land by a natural cause, the land would have qualified as agricultural land for the following property tax year, the agricultural land classification shall remain in place notwithstanding the length of the rehabilitation period specified in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (e) of this subsection (5) so long as the owner is in compliance with an approved forest management plan and is on the list provided by the Colorado state forest service as having such a plan.
      2. The agricultural land classification of the land described in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (f) must change according to current use if:
        1. The assessor determines that the classification at the time of destruction of the productivity of the land as a result of a natural cause was erroneous; or
        2. A change of use has occurred. For purposes of this sub-subparagraph (B), a change of use does not include the temporary loss of agricultural classification of the land as a result of the destruction of the productivity of the land by a natural cause.
  4. Repealed.
  5. In any case in which sales prices of comparable properties within any class or subclass are utilized when considering the market approach to appraisal in the determination of actual value of any taxable property, the following limitations and conditions shall apply:
      1. Use of the market approach shall require a representative body of sales, including sales by a lender or government, sufficient to set a pattern, and appraisals shall reflect due consideration of the degree of comparability of sales, including the extent of similarities and dissimilarities among properties that are compared for assessment purposes. In order to obtain a reasonable sample and to reduce sudden price changes or fluctuations, all sales shall be included in the sample that reasonably reflect a true or typical sales price during the period specified in section 39-1-104 (10.2). Sales of personal property exempt pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-102, 39-3-103, and 39-3-119 to 39-3-122 shall not be included in any such sample.
      2. Because of the unique characteristics and limited number of oil shale mineral interests, a minimum of five arm's-length sales of reasonably comparable oil shale mineral interests shall be required to constitute a market for purposes of utilization of the market approach to appraisal in determining the actual value of nonproducing oil shale mineral interests.
    1. Each such sale included in the sample shall be coded to indicate a typical, negotiated sale, as screened and verified by the assessor.
    2. All such coded, typical sales samples shall be supplied to the administrator for the performance of his duties.
    3. In no event shall a sales ratio be established or utilized for any class or subclass of property unless and until there have been at least thirty such coded, typical sales or at least five percent of all properties in such class or subclass within the county have been sold and verified by the assessor as coded, typical sales, whichever amount is greater. When such minimum requirement has not been met but typical sales within any such class or subclass indicate that valuations in the class or subclass are too high or too low, such fact shall be reported to the state board of equalization, which board may order an independent appraisal study in such county.
    4. Repealed.
    5. Such true and typical sales shall include only those sales which have been determined on an individual basis to reflect the selling price of the real property only or which have been adjusted on an individual basis to reflect the selling price of the real property only.
    1. In the case of an improvement which is used as a residential dwelling unit and is also used for any other purpose, the actual value and valuation for assessment of such improvement shall be determined as provided in this paragraph (a). The actual value of each portion of the improvement shall be determined by application of the appropriate approaches to appraisal specified in subsection (5) of this section. The actual value of the land containing such an improvement shall be determined by application of the appropriate approaches to appraisal specified in subsection (5) of this section. The land containing such an improvement shall be allocated to the appropriate classes based upon the proportion that the actual value of each of the classes to which the improvement is allocated bears to the total actual value of the improvement. The appropriate valuation for assessment ratio shall then be applied to the actual value of each portion of the land and of the improvement.
    2. In the case of land containing more than one improvement, one of which is a residential dwelling unit, the determination of which class the land shall be allocated to shall be based upon the predominant or primary use to which the land is put in compliance with land use regulations. If multiuse is permitted by land use regulations, the land shall be allocated to the appropriate classes based upon the proportion that the actual value of each of the classes to which the improvements are allocated bears to the combined actual value of the improvements; the appropriate valuation for assessment ratio shall then be applied to the actual value of each portion of the land.
  6. Common property or common elements within a common interest community as defined in the "Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act", article 33.3 of title 38, C.R.S., shall be appraised and valued pursuant to the provisions of section 38-33.3-105, C.R.S.

    1. (10.5) (a) The general assembly hereby finds and declares that bed and breakfasts are unique mixed-use properties; that all areas of a bed and breakfast, except for the commercial lodging area, are shared and common areas that allow innkeepers and guests to interact in a residential setting; that the land on which a bed and breakfast is located and that is used in conjunction with the bed and breakfast is primarily residential in nature; and that there appears to exist a wide disparity in how assessors classify the different portions of bed and breakfasts.
    2. Therefore, notwithstanding any other provision of this article 1, a bed and breakfast shall be assessed as provided in this subsection (10.5). The commercial lodging area of a bed and breakfast shall be assessed at the rate for lodging property. Any part of the bed and breakfast that is not a commercial lodging area shall be considered a residential improvement and assessed accordingly. The actual value of each portion of the bed and breakfast shall be determined by the application of the appropriate approaches to appraisal specified in subsection (5) of this section. The actual value of the land containing a bed and breakfast shall be determined by the application of the appropriate approaches to appraisal specified in subsection (5) of this section. The land containing a bed and breakfast shall be assessed as follows:
      1. The portion of land directly underneath a bed and breakfast shall be assessed pursuant to the procedures pertaining to land set forth in subsection (9) of this section.
      2. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that all remaining land shall be assessed as residential land. Such presumption shall only be overcome if there is a nonresidential use not reasonably associated with the operation of the bed and breakfast on some portion of the remaining land, in which case, such portion of the remaining land shall be assessed as nonresidential land.
      3. Subparagraphs (I) and (II) of this paragraph (b) shall not apply to agricultural land.
  7. The general assembly hereby declares that consideration by assessing officers of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to the appraisal of real property has resulted in valuations of minerals in place which are neither uniform, nor just and equal, because of wide variations within the same locality in quality and quantity of mineral deposits, if any, because of uncertainty in the existence or extent of such deposits, because of difficulty in measuring acquisition or replacement costs, or because of speculative value judgments when minerals in place are not income producing. Therefore, in the absence of preponderant evidence shown by the assessing officer that the use of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach result in uniform and just and equal valuation, minerals in place are not to be considered in determining the actual value of real property.
  8. In any case in which the income approach is utilized in the determination of the actual value of any nonproducing oil shale mineral interests, the following limitations and conditions shall apply:
    1. The assessor shall capitalize the annual rental income for such nonproducing mineral interests at a capitalization rate of thirteen percent. If nonproducing mineral interests are unleased, the assessor shall use the annual rental as defined in paragraph (b) of this subsection (12).
    2. For the purposes of this subsection (12), "annual rental" means annual rental payments, or other compensatory payments payable for the right to hold a mineral interest, which payments are fixed and certain in amount and payable periodically over a fixed period calculated on a twelve-month basis. "Annual rental" shall be the representative annual rental for such mineral interests leased within the county or the area, and "annual rental" does not include royalty payments, advanced royalty payments, bonus payments, or minimum royalty payments covering periods when the mineral interests are not in production, even though said payments may be fixed and certain in amount and payable periodically. For the purposes of this paragraph (b), "royalty payments", "advanced royalty payments", and "minimum royalty payments" mean payments attributable to a portion of the current or future mineral production of a mineral interest, paid for the privilege of producing minerals, and "bonus payments" means compensation paid as consideration for the granting of a mineral lease or other compensatory payments which are payable regardless of the extent of use of the mineral interest and which are fixed and certain in amount and may be payable in one or more periodical increments over a fixed period.
    1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that, in the consideration of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to the appraisal of personal property by assessing officers, the cost approach shall establish the maximum value of property if all costs incurred in the acquisition and installation of such property are fully and completely disclosed by the property owner to the assessing officer.
    2. Therefore, in the assessment of taxable personal property, the assessing officer shall consider the value derived from the cost approach to be the maximum value of the property if the property owner has timely filed his declaration and the declaration contains all relevant information pertaining to the valuation of the property and, also includes, a full disclosure of all costs incurred in the acquisition and installation of all personal property owned by or in the possession of the taxpayer.
    3. Assessing officers shall consider the cost approach to the appraisal of property, pursuant to the provisions of this subsection (13), in good faith and shall deny the use of the cost approach only upon just cause that the requirements set forth in this subsection (13) and in section 39-5-116 have not been complied with by a taxpayer. If it is determined at any time that an assessing officer wrongly denied the use of the cost approach, such assessing officer shall be held liable for all costs incurred by the taxpayer in protesting such assessment based on such denial. However, nothing in this subsection (13) shall preclude the assessing officers from considering the market approach or income approach to the appraisal of personal property when such consideration would result in a lower value of the property and when such valuation is based on independent information obtained by the assessing officers.
    1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that, in determining the actual value of vacant land, there appears to exist a wide disparity in the treatment of vacant land by the assessing officers of the various counties; that the methods of appraisal currently being utilized by assessing officers for such valuation remain unclear; and that such assessing officers are provided detailed information concerning the appraisal of vacant land in the manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions prepared and published by the administrator.
    2. The assessing officers shall give appropriate consideration to the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to appraisal as required by the provisions of section 3 of article X of the state constitution in determining the actual value of vacant land. When using the market approach to appraisal in determining the actual value of vacant land as of the assessment date, assessing officers shall take into account, but need not limit their consideration to, the following factors: The anticipated market absorption rate, the size and location of such land, the direct costs of development, any amenities, any site improvements, access, and use. When using anticipated market absorption rates, the assessing officers shall use appropriate discount factors in determining the present worth of vacant land until eighty percent of the lots within an approved plat have been sold and shall include all vacant land in the approved plat. For purposes of such discounting, direct costs of development shall be taken into account. The use of present worth shall reflect the anticipated market absorption rate for the lots within such plat, but such time period shall not generally exceed thirty years. For purposes of this paragraph (b), no indirect costs of development, including, but not limited to, costs relating to marketing, overhead, or profit, shall be considered or taken into account.
      1. For purposes of this subsection (14), "vacant land" means any lot, parcel, site, or tract of land upon which no buildings or fixtures, other than minor structures, are located. "Vacant land" may include land with site improvements. "Vacant land" includes land that is part of a development tract or subdivision when using present worth discounting in the market approach to appraisal; however, "vacant land" shall not include any lots within such subdivision or any portion of such development tract that improvements, other than site improvements or minor structures, have been erected upon or affixed thereto. "Vacant land" does not include agricultural land, producing oil and gas properties, severed mineral interests, and all mines, whether producing or nonproducing.
      2. For purposes of this subsection (14):
        1. "Minor structures" means improvements that do not add value to the land on which they are located and that are not suitable to be used for and are not actually used for any commercial, residential, or agricultural purpose.
        2. "Site improvements" means streets with curbs and gutters, culverts and other sewage and drainage facilities, and utility easements and hookups for individual lots or parcels.
    3. As soon after the assessment date as may be practicable, the assessor shall mail or deliver two copies of a subdivision land valuation questionnaire for each approved plat within the county to the last-known address of the subdivision developer known or believed to own vacant land within such approved plat. Such questionnaire shall be designed to elicit information vital to determining the present worth of vacant land within such approved plat. Such subdivision developer or his agent shall answer all questions to the best of his ability, attaching such exhibits or statements thereto as may be necessary, and shall sign and return the original copy thereof to the assessor no later than the March 20 subsequent to the assessment date. All information provided by the subdivision developer in such questionnaire shall be kept confidential by the assessor; except that the assessor shall make such information available to the person conducting any valuation for assessment study pursuant to section 39-1-104 (16) and his employees and the property tax administrator and his employees.
    4. If any subdivision developer fails to complete and file one or more questionnaires by March 20, then the assessor may determine the actual value of the taxable vacant land within an approved plat which is owned by such subdivision developer on the basis of the best information available to and obtainable by the assessor.
  9. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that assessing officers shall give appropriate consideration to the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to appraisal as required by section 3 of article X of the state constitution in determining the actual value of taxable property. In the absence of evidence shown by the assessing officer that the use of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to appraisal requires the modification of the actual value of taxable property for the first year of a reassessment cycle in order to result in uniform and just and equal valuation for the second year of a reassessment cycle, the assessing officer shall consider the actual value of any taxable property for the first year of a reassessment cycle, as may have been adjusted as a result of protests and appeals, if any, prior to the assessment date of the second year of a reassessment cycle, to be the actual value of such taxable property for the second year of a reassessment cycle.
    1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that in the consideration of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to appraisal for the valuation of superfund water treatment facilities, the cost approach to appraisal does not adequately reflect characteristics specific to superfund water treatment facilities that negatively impact the value of such facilities, including, but not limited to, the lack of income producing ability and the absence of any market for sale of superfund water treatment facilities. Therefore, in the assessment of superfund water treatment facilities, the income approach to appraisal shall be considered the primary indicator of value and the cost approach or market approach to appraisal shall be used only if the value determined under the cost approach or market approach is less than the value determined under the income approach to appraisal. For the purposes of determining the actual value of superfund water treatment facilities as of the assessment date using the income approach to appraisal, the assessing officer shall capitalize the actual income generated by the facility during the calendar year preceding the assessment date at the rate of ten percent per annum.
    2. For purposes of this subsection (16), "superfund water treatment facilities" means real and personal property that is:
      1. Installed and constructed pursuant to an agreement with or an order of the federal government or the state or any of its political subdivisions and to satisfy the federal "Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980", 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601, et seq., as amended; and
      2. Operated for the purpose of eliminating, reducing, controlling, or disposing of pollutants, as defined in section 25-8-103 (15), C.R.S., that could alter the physical, chemical, biological, or radiological integrity of state waters if released into state waters.
      3. Subparagraphs (I) and (II) of this paragraph (a) shall not apply to any management contract. In the case of a management contract, the possessory interest shall be presumed to have no actual value. For purposes of this subparagraph (III), "management contract" means a contract that meets all of the following criteria:
    1. The general assembly declares that the valuation of possessory interests in exempt properties is uncertain and highly speculative and that the following specific standards for the appropriate consideration of the cost approach, the market approach, and the income approach to appraisal in the valuation of possessory interests must be provided by statute and applied in the valuation of possessory interests to eliminate the unjust and unequalized valuations that would result in the absence of specific standards:

      (I) The actual value of any possessory interest of the lessee or permittee of lands owned by the United States and leased or permitted for use for ski area recreational purposes in connection with a business conducted for profit shall be determined by capitalizing at an appropriate rate the annual fee paid to the United States by the lessee or permittee of such land for the use thereof in the immediately preceding calendar year, adjusted to the level of value using a factor or factors to be published by the administrator pursuant to the same procedures and principles as are provided for property in section 39-1-104 (12.3)(a)(I). The rate used to capitalize any fee pursuant to this subparagraph (I) shall include an appropriate rate of return, an appropriate adjustment for the applicable property tax rate, and an appropriate adjustment to reflect the portion of the fee, if any, required to be paid over by the United States to the state of Colorado and its political subdivisions.

      (II) (A) Except for possessory interests in land leased or permitted for use for ski area recreational purposes valued in accordance with subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) and except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (III) of this paragraph (a), the actual value of a possessory interest in land, improvements, or personal property shall be determined by appropriate consideration of the cost approach, the market approach, and the income approach to appraisal. When the cost or income approach to appraisal is applicable, the actual value of the possessory interest shall be determined by the present value of the reasonably estimated future annual rents or fees required to be paid by the holder of the possessory interest to the owner of the underlying real or personal property through the stated initial term of the lease or other instrument granting the possessory interest; except that the actual value of a possessory interest in agricultural land, including land leased by the state board of land commissioners other than land leased pursuant to section 36-1-120.5, C.R.S., shall be the actual amount of the annual rent paid for the property tax year. The rents or fees used to determine the actual value of a possessory interest under the cost or income approach to appraisal shall be the actual contract rents or fees reasonably expected to be paid to the owner of the underlying real or personal property unless it is shown that the actual contract rents or fees to be paid for the possessory interest being valued are not representative of the market rents or fees paid for that type of real or personal property, in which case the market rents or fees shall be substituted for the actual contract rents or fees.

      (B) The rents or fees taken into account under the cost or income approach to appraisal under sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (II) shall exclude that portion of the rents and fees required to be paid for all rights other than the exclusive right to use and possess the land, improvements, or personal property. Such rents or fees to be excluded shall include, but shall not be limited to, any portion of such rents or fees attributable to any of the following: Nonexclusive rights to use and possess public property, such as roads, rights-of-way, easements, and common areas; rights to conduct a business, as determined in accordance with guidelines to be published by the administrator; income of the holder of the possessory interest that is not directly derived from and directly related to the use or occupancy of the possessory interest; any amount paid under a timber sales contract or similar agreement for the purchase of timber or for the right to acquire and remove timber; and reimbursement to the owner of the underlying real or personal property of the reasonable costs of operating, maintaining, and repairing the land, improvements, or personal property to which the possessory interest pertains, regardless of whether such costs are separately stated, provided that the types of such costs can be identified with reasonable certainty from the documents granting the possessory interest. The actual value of the possessory interest so determined shall be adjusted to the taxable level of value using a factor or factors to be published by the administrator pursuant to the same procedures and principles as are provided for personal property in section 39-1-104 (12.3)(a)(I).

      1. The government owner of the real or personal property subject to the contract directly or indirectly provides the management contractor all funds to operate the real or personal property;
      2. The government owns all of the real or personal property used in the operation of the real or personal property subject to the contract;
      3. The government maintains control over the amount of profit the management contractor can realize or sets the prices charged by the management contractor, or the management contractor's exclusive obligation is to operate and manage the real or personal property for which the management contractor receives a fee;
      4. The government reserves the right to use the real or personal property when it is not being managed or operated by the management contractor;
      5. The management contractor has no leasehold or similar interest in the real or personal property;
      6. To the extent the management contractor manages a manufacturing process for the government on the real property subject to the contract, the government owns all or substantially all of the personal property used in the process; and
      7. The real or personal property is maintained and repaired at the expense of the government.
    2. This subsection (17) shall not apply to and shall not be construed to affect or change the valuation of public utilities pursuant to article 4 of this title, the valuation of equities in state lands pursuant to section 39-5-106, the valuation of mines pursuant to article 6 or any other article of this title, or the valuation of oil and gas leaseholds and lands pursuant to article 7 of this title.
    1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that real property that is located in a district in which limited gaming is authorized but that is not used for limited gaming may be unfairly valued by comparison of said real property with real property that is used for limited gaming. The general assembly further finds that real property that is located in a gaming district may be reasonably used for purposes other than limited gaming, that such alternative uses may be beneficial in strengthening the economies of gaming districts, and that such alternative uses should be encouraged. In addition, the general assembly finds that applying the cost and market approaches to appraisal in valuing real property that is located in a limited gaming district but that is not used for limited gaming may result in an unfairly high valuation of real property that is reasonably used for a purpose other than limited gaming. Therefore, the provisions of this subsection (18) shall govern the classification and valuation of real property that is located within a gaming district but that is not used for limited gaming.
    2. For property tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1999, if the actual use as of the assessment date of any real property that is located in a limited gaming district but that is not used for limited gaming is used as residential real property, the real property shall be classified as residential real property, and the assessing officer shall determine the actual value of said real property as of the assessment date by applying the market approach to appraisal. If, due to the limited number of real properties located within a limited gaming district that are not used for limited gaming and that are used as residential real property, comparable valuation data is not available from within a limited gaming district to determine adequately the actual value of real property located within said limited gaming district that is not used for limited gaming and that is used as residential real property, notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the assessing officer shall consider sales of reasonably comparable residential real property located inside and outside of any limited gaming district for purposes of utilization of the market approach to appraisal in determining the actual value of said real property located within a limited gaming district that is not used for limited gaming and that is used as residential real property.
    3. For property tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1999, if the actual use as of the assessment date of any real property that is located in a limited gaming district is not for limited gaming or as residential real property, including but not limited to vacant land, the real property shall be classified as nongaming real property, and the assessing officer shall determine the actual value of said real property as of the assessment date by giving appropriate consideration to the cost, market, and income approaches to appraisal. If, due to the limited number of real properties located within a limited gaming district that are not used for limited gaming or as residential real property, comparable valuation data is not available from within a limited gaming district to determine adequately the actual value of real property located within said limited gaming district that is not used for limited gaming or as residential real property, notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the assessing officer shall:
      1. Consider sales of reasonably comparable real property that is not used as residential property located inside and outside of any limited gaming district for purposes of utilization of the market approach to appraisal in determining the actual value of real property located within a limited gaming district that is not used for limited gaming or as residential real property; and
      2. Consider reasonably comparable real property that is not used as residential property located inside and outside of any limited gaming district for purposes of utilization of the income approach to appraisal in determining the actual value of real property located within a limited gaming district that is not used for limited gaming or as residential real property.
    4. For purposes of this subsection (18), real property is considered to be "used for limited gaming" if the owner or lessee of the real property holds a retail gaming license issued pursuant to part 5 of article 30 of title 44, and if the owner or lessee actually uses the real property in offering limited gaming for play or for administrative support services related to providing limited gaming or makes the real property available for other uses by persons who are engaged in limited gaming for play, including but not limited to using the property for parking, for a restaurant, or for a hotel or motel.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 676, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-3. L. 67: p. 945, §§ 2-4. L. 70: p. 380, § 9. L. 71: p. 1242, § 1. L. 73: pp. 237, 1429, §§ 18, 1. L. 75: (6)(a)(I) amended, p. 1453, § 1, effective May 22; (4)(b) repealed, p. 1473, § 30, effective July 18. L. 76: (5) amended, p. 754, § 3, effective January 1, 1977. L. 77: (5) amended and (7) and (8) added p. 1729, § 2, effective June 20; (4)(b) RC&RE, p. 1740, § 2, effective January 1, 1978. L. 81: (5)(a) amended, p. 1829, § 1, effective June 12. L. 83: (8)(d) amended, p. 1489, § 1, effective April 21; (9) added, p. 1492, § 1, effective April 21; (4)(a) and (5)(b) repealed and (5)(a), IP(8), and (8)(a) amended, pp. 1485, 1480, §§ 11, 2, effective April 22; (6) repealed, p. 1488, § 6, effective June 1. L. 84: (8)(e) and (8)(f) added, p. 986, § 1, effective March 16; (10) added, p. 987, § 1, effective April 5. L. 85: (5)(b) RC&RE, (8)(a) amended, and (11) and (12) added, pp. 1210, 1211, §§ 3, 4, effective May 9; (5)(a) amended, p. 1217, § 1, effective May 24. L. 87: (7) repealed, p. 1304, § 1, effective May 20; (13) added, p. 1415, § 2, effective June 16; (8)(e) amended, p. 1388, § 9, effective June 20. L. 88: (14) added, p. 1281, § 4, effective January 1, 1989. L. 89: (8)(a)(I) amended, p. 1482, § 4, effective May 9; (14)(b) and (14)(c)(I) amended, p. 1449, § 1, effective June 7. L. 90: (5)(c), (14)(d), and (14)(e) added, (8)(a)(I) and (14)(b) amended, and (8)(e) repealed, pp. 1701, 1688, 1705, §§ 34, 3, 2, 41, effective June 9; (15) added, p. 1697, § 22, effective January 1, 1991. L. 91: (8)(a)(I) amended, p. 2005, § 3, effective June 6. L. 92: (14)(b) amended, p. 2215, § 1, effective June 2. L. 93: (10) amended, p. 654, § 22, effective April 30; (5)(c) amended, p. 1743, § 2, effective July 1. L. 95: (8)(a)(I) amended, p. 8, § 2, effective March 9; (5)(a) amended and (5)(d) added, p. 174, § 3, effective April 7. L. 96: (16) added, p. 130, § 1, effective March 25; (5)(a) and (8)(a)(I) amended, p. 718, § 1, effective May 22; (14)(c) amended, p. 1198, § 1, effective June 1; (17) added, p. 1852, § 4, effective June 5. L. 97: (17)(a)(II)(B) amended, p. 1030, § 63, effective August 6. L. 98: (18) added, p. 110, § 1, effective March 23. L. 2000: (5)(a) amended, p. 1499, § 2, effective August 2. L. 2002: IP(17)(a) amended, p. 1008, § 1, effective August 7; (10.5) added, p. 1672, § 2, effective January 1, 2003. L. 2003: (17)(a)(II)(A) amended, p. 1696, § 1, effective January 1, 2004; (17)(a)(II)(B) amended, p. 2492, § 1, effective January 1, 2004. L. 2004: (17)(a)(II)(A) amended, p. 1088, § 1, effective January 1, 2005. L. 2010: (5)(a) amended, (HB 10-1197), ch. 175, p. 634, § 2, effective August 11. L. 2011: (5)(c) amended, (HB 11-1042), ch. 138, p. 480, § 2, effective May 4. L. 2015: (5)(c) amended and (5)(e) and (5)(f) added, (HB 15-1008), ch. 90, p. 258, § 1, effective April 10. L. 2018: (5)(c) amended, (HB 18-1283), ch. 270, p. 1666, § 2, effective August 8; (18)(d) amended, (SB 18-034), ch. 14, p. 249, § 45, effective October 1. L. 2021: IP(10.5)(b) amended, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1812, § 11, effective June 23; (5)(a) amended, (HB 21-1312), ch. 299, p. 1791, § 4, effective July 1.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1312, see section 1 of chapter 299, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Appealing Property Tax Assessments," see 15 Colo. Law. 798 (1986). For article, "Legislative Update on Property Taxation and New Arbitration Procedures", see 17 Colo. Law. 1751 (1988). For article, "Taxation of Possessory Interests in Exempt Property Under S.B. 02-157", see 32 Colo. Law. 81 (Mar. 2003).

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.

Standing to challenge constitutionality of subsection (5). Members of board of county commissioners, also empowered to sit as board of equalization to equalize valuations, lack standing to challenge the constitutionality of ministerial duties imposed by subsection (5). Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Fifty-first Gen. Ass'y, 198 Colo. 302 , 599 P.2d 887 (1979).

The general assembly has authority to address methods of valuation and differences between types of possessory uses in assessing their value for taxation purposes. The legislature has a determinative role in adopting valuation provisions consistent with the state constitution and has exercised its authority in this regard by adopting subsection (17). Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo. 2001).

Method of valuation is legislative determination. The method by which valuation for taxation purposes is to be formulated is a legislative function and is not a proper subject for judicial determination. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 628 P.2d 156 (Colo. App. 1981); Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

Subsection (17) became effective upon a determination that the state constitution requires that possessory interests in tax-exempt property be taxed. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 ( Colo. 2001 ); Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd on other grounds, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Subsection (17) does not provide the authority for taxation of possessory interests or dictate whether or not an interest is taxable. Possessory interests are, in and of themselves, real property interests that are subject to property taxation unless exempted. Subsection (17) addresses only the valuation of taxable possessory interests. Rare Air Ltd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2019 COA 134 , 459 P.3d 547.

Subsections (17)(a)(II)(A) and (B) are not unconstitutionally overbroad. The statute's tax valuation provisions do not infringe on any constitutionally protected right. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd on other grounds, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Subsection (17)(a)(II)(B) is not facially vague. The statute is not facially vague for failure to define which possessory interests in tax-exempt property are taxable because it does not impose a tax or define taxable interests. Rather, it merely creates a methodology for valuing a taxable possessory interest in tax-exempt property. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd on other grounds, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Subsection (17)(a)(II)(B) is not unconstitutionally vague as applied. The plaintiffs' possessory interests are taxable. Therefore, it cannot be said that this statute, comprising a set of tax valuation procedures, has been applied to their properly taxable possessory interests in an unconstitutional manner. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd on other grounds, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

The "significant incidents of ownership" of interests in tax-exempt property are a predicate for taxation under the statutes and article X of the state constitution. A possessory interest in tax exempt land is taxable provided that the possessory interest satisfies a three-pronged test demonstrating significant incidents of private ownership as determined by the possessor's right to possession, use, enjoyment, and profits of the property. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo. 2001).

Three-pronged test demonstrating significant incidents of private ownership. To be taxable, the possessory interest must be such that (1) it provides a revenue-generating capability to the private possessor independent of the government property owner; (2) the private owner is able to exclude others from making the same use of the interest; and (3) the private ownership is of sufficient duration to realize a private benefit. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 ( Colo. 2001 ); Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Test applied in Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

The possessory interests in concession spaces held by several food and beverage concessionaires at Denver International Airport are taxable under article X of the Colorado constitution and property tax statutes because the concessionaires' interests exhibit significant incidents of private ownership under the three-factor test established in Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Vail Assocs., Inc. Specifically: (1) the concessionaires' interests are sufficiently exclusive to qualify as real property interests under the property tax statutes because the concessionaires have the right to exclude others from using their respective concession spaces; and (2) the concessionaires' revenue-generating capability is sufficiently independent from the city that a tax on their possessory interests would not effectively be a tax on the government. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Exclusivity refers to the interest holder's ability to exclude others from the same use of the particular area it occupies. The exclusivity factor is met because concessionaires have the right to exclude others from using each of their concession spaces to operate a concession business. That a competitor may operate a concession at a nearby location has no bearing on this factor. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Because the exclusivity factor focuses on whether the interest holder's use of a particular area it occupies is sufficiently exclusive, the interest holder's inability to exclude competition from other locations is not probative of exclusivity. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

To be taxable under article X of the Colorado constitution, the possessory interest must be sufficiently exclusive to qualify as a real property interest as defined under the revenue statutes. The exclusivity factor of the Vail Associates test ensures that the interest to be taxed is indeed a property interest that is taxable under article X and the revenue statutes. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Absolute exclusivity not required under the second prong of the analysis. Though the possessory interest necessarily involves some degree of exclusivity under the second prong of the three-prong test, absolute exclusivity is not required. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

A possessory interest does not depend on the ability to exclude competition. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

The proper inquiry is whether others may make the same physical use of the possessory interest as that of the leaseholder. Because a nonexclusivity provision permitting the government owner to enter into agreements with other concessionaires to sell similar items in other locations did not permit other concessionaires the right to operate out of an existing concessionaire's locations, concessionaires' possession and occupancy of the taxable possessory interests were sufficiently exclusive under the second prong of the test. Cantina Grill v. City & County of Denver, 2012 COA 154 , 292 P.3d 1144, aff'd, 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

The independence inquiry does not turn on the source of revenue alone. The degree of control exercised by the possessory interest holder, not merely its source of revenue, is relevant to determining whether the possessory interest holder's revenue-generating capability is sufficiently independent from the government. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

The totality of the circumstances must be examined to determine whether an interest holder's revenue-generating capability is truly independent from the government, or whether the interest holder is merely an agent of the government, such that any tax on the interest holder would be a tax on the government. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, whether: (1) the government pays a fee to the interest holder for its operation of the property in question; (2) the government controls the prices the interest holder can charge or restricts the profits the interest holder can generate; (3) the interest holder provides the supplies, equipment, and improvements necessary for the operation of the property; (4) the interest holder is responsible for the expense of maintaining and repairing the property; and (5) the interest holder has sufficient control and supervision of its operation. Cantina Grill v. Denver County Bd. of Equaliz., 2015 CO 15, 344 P.3d 870.

Requirement in subsection (5)(a) that a property assessor give "appropriate consideration" to the income, market, and cost approaches does not require complete and documented calculations of each approach or an explanation of the reasons for excluding those not used. ASARCO, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Lake County, 916 P.2d 550 (Colo. App. 1995).

If the market and income approaches to valuation are inapplicable or do not produce a meaningful valuation for assessment purposes, it is appropriate for the assessor to use only the cost approach. ASARCO, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Lake County, 916 P.2d 550 (Colo. App. 1995).

Under the cost approach, reproduction cost rather than replacement cost was held to be an appropriate measure in light of the special purpose and regulatory specifications applicable to an EPA-ordered water treatment facility. ASARCO, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Lake County, 916 P.2d 550 (Colo. App. 1995).

The comparable sales price, rather than the manufacturer's cost, is the appropriate starting point for the cost approach. Xerox Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 87 P.3d 189 (Colo. App. 2003).

No requirement for assessor or board to compare valuations with other counties to determine compliance with article X, § 3, of the Colorado Constitution. The issue of just and equal valuation among counties is not cognizable in an appeal to the board of an assessor's valuation, and constitutional requirement does not require an assessor or a board to compare valuations with those made for comparable properties in other counties. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. E.E. Sonnenberg, 797 P.2d 27 (Colo. 1990).

Actual value is the guiding principle for the taxation of real property in Colorado. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Podoll, 935 P.2d 14 ( Colo. 1997 ); San Miguel County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Telluride Co., 947 P.2d 1381 ( Colo. 1997 ).

Valuing similar property, similarly situated is consistent with statutory and constitutional mandates to achieve just and equalized values for purposes of taxation. Telluride Co. v. County Bd. of Equaliz., 962 P.2d 313 (Colo. App. 1997).

Value determined as of date of assessment. County assessor has the duty of determining the values of properties as they existed on the date of the assessment. Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962).

Assessor's valuation presumed correct. An assessor's ascertainment of the value of property for taxation is presumed to be right. Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962).

Assessors furnished guides to aid in valuation. In order to promote uniformity and equality in taxation, assessors are supplied with manuals which furnish them with guides for determining valuations for tax purposes. Stalder v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 147 Colo. 493 , 364 P.2d 389 (1961); Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962).

Clear and convincing evidence must be adduced to overcome presumption of correctness of an assessor's valuation of property for taxation. Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962).

Presumption of correction of assessor's valuation overcome. May Stores Shopping Ctrs., Inc. v. Shoemaker, 151 Colo. 100 , 376 P.2d 679 (1962).

Presumption of correctness of assessor's valuation rebutted where sufficient evidence presented of assessor's failure to comply with requirements of subsection (5)(a). Transamerican Realty Corp. v. Clifton, 817 P.2d 1049 (Colo. App. 1991).

Assessor held not to have followed mandate of statute in determining "actual value". Majestic Great W. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Reale, 30 Colo. App. 564, 499 P.2d 644 (1972).

Market value usually measure of "actual value". In determining "actual value", market value is usually taken as the measure, because most likely to be just and least difficult of ascertainment. Fellows v. Grand Junction Sugar Co., 78 Colo. 393, 242 P. 635 (1925).

For determination of "market value", see Union P. R. R. v. Hanna, 73 Colo. 162 , 214 P. 550 (1923); Fellows v. Grand Junction Sugar Co., 78 Colo. 393 , 242 P. 635 (1925); City & County of Denver v. Lewin, 106 Colo. 331 , 105 P.2d 854 (1940); Stalder v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 147 Colo. 493 , 364 P.2d 389 (1961); Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962); May Stores Shopping Ctrs., Inc. v. Shoemaker, 151 Colo. 100 , 376 P.2d 679 (1962).

Trial court has no authority to make an assessment or fix a valuation. Colo. & Utah Coal Co. v. Rorex, 149 Colo. 502 , 369 P.2d 796 (1962).

Review by the court is therefore limited to the narrow ascertainment of agency abuse of discretion by neglecting to abide by the statutes in the calculation of tax assessments. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

The language of the statute is unambiguous and sets forth an exclusive and restrictive set of unusual circumstances upon which the assessor may, in his discretion, rely in calculating the actual value of commercial property. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

Factors, such as a depressed economy, which encourage rent abatement, are not included within that list of unusual circumstances. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

Unusual conditions affecting actual value are factors for consideration by the assessor in assessing real property. Depreciation factors apply only to personal property. CF & I Steel Corp. v. Patton, 765 P.2d 586 (Colo. App. 1988), rev'd on other grounds, 785 P.2d 605 ( Colo. 1990 ).

Reasonable future use is relevant to a property's current market value for tax assessment purposes. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. Arlberg Club, 762 P.2d 146 (Colo. 1988).

Highest and best future use of land in its condition at the time of valuation may be considered in determining present fair market value while speculative future uses may not be taken into consideration. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. Arlberg Club, 762 P.2d 146 (Colo. 1988).

Depreciation required to be calculated annually from the base year to the date of assessment for valuing personal business property. BQP Indus. v. State Bd. of Equaliz., 694 P.2d 337 (Colo. App. 1984).

Subsection (5)(a) requires that, if an approach to value is applicable, assessor must give it appropriate consideration in valuing property. Transamerican Realty Corp. v. Clifton, 817 P.2d 1049 (Colo. App. 1991).

Subsection (5)(a) requires only that "appropriate consideration" be given to the cost approach, market approach, and income approach to appraisal when valuing property for assessment. Montrose Prop. v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 738 P.2d 396 (Colo. App. 1987).

However, where an assessor gave no consideration to the market or income approach to assessment of property because of financial and time constraints, the evidence did not support a conclusion that appropriate consideration was given to all three statutorily recognized approaches. Sonnenberg & Sons v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 768 P.2d 748 (Colo. App. 1988), aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 797 P.2d 27 ( Colo. 1990 ).

In valuing in accordance with constitutional and statutory requirements, the cost approach, market approach, and income approach must be considered by the assessor, but one or more of the three approaches may not be applicable in a particular case. The nature of the property may rule out consideration of one or more approaches or there may be insufficient data to allow all of the approaches to be used. 501 So. Cherry J. Venture v. Arapahoe County, 817 P.2d 583 (Colo. App. 1991).

Assessor's failure to consider income approach due to time constraints imposed in conducting major reappraisal in county, in addition to failure to adequately document market or cost approaches applied, violated statutory requirement to give "appropriate consideration" to all applicable approaches to valuation. Transamerican Realty Corp. v. Clifton, 817 P.2d 1049 (Colo. App. 1991).

In giving "appropriate consideration", assessor must consider and document all applicable approaches to valuation. Transamerican Realty Corp. v. Clifton, 817 P.2d 1049 (Colo. App. 1991).

"Appropriate consideration" of the cost approach, market approach, and income approach does not include consideration and documentation of inapplicable approaches. CF & I Steel Corp. v. Patton, 765 P.2d 586 (Colo. App. 1988), rev'd on other grounds, 785 P.2d 605 ( Colo. 1990 ).

However, if an approach to value is applicable, it must be given appropriate consideration by the assessor, as well as by the board of assessment appeals (BAA), as the trier of fact. Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Pueblo County Bd. of Comm'rs, 50 P.3d 916 (Colo. App. 2002).

Assessor was required to give appropriate consideration to the cost, market, and income approaches to appraisal when valuing a nonproducing mine undergoing reclamation that could not be classified as agricultural land. Hepp v. Boulder County Assessor, 113 P.3d 1268 (Colo. App. 2005).

Market value approach to value mandates that appraiser determine the probable sales price for property by considering what other comparable properties actually sold for in the market place at or about the date for which a value is sought. Home Fed. Sav. v. Larimer County, 857 P.2d 562 (Colo. App. 1993).

The income approach is an important method for valuing office buildings, but it is not held as a matter of law that any particular approach must be used under the statutory scheme. The county assessor should determine proper valuation of taxpayer's property after appropriate consideration of the three approaches designated by the general assembly, after proper analysis of the applicable approaches, and after systematic correlation to reach a final estimate of value. 501 So. Cherry J. Venture v. Arapahoe County, 817 P.2d 583 (Colo. App. 1991).

Actual rent generated from a lease is a valid factor to be considered in determining the actual or market value of the property for purposes of assessment. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. City & County of Denver, 829 P.2d 1319 (Colo. App. 1991), aff'd, 848 P.2d 355 ( Colo. 1993 ).

Resort's income from rental management fees paid by condominium owners is excluded from valuation under the income approach to valuation. When a resort includes a corporate-owned hotel and separately owned condominium units, fees paid to a subsidiary of the hotel owner by the condominium unit owners for rental management services are not income that the hotel generates because the hotel and the condominium units are legally separate and distinct parcels of property that must be separately valued and appraised and the income used to pay the fees is derived from the rental of the condominium units. Lodge Props. v. Eagle County Bd. of Equaliz., 2022 CO 9, __ P.3d __ [published February 22, 2022].

Assessor's technical violation of the notification and timing requirements of subsection (5)(c) that does not prejudice taxpayers' substantive rights does not justify reversal of an order of the BAA upholding the assessor's classification of taxpayers' property. Johnston v. Park County Bd. of Equaliz., 979 P.2d 578 (Colo. App. 1999).

Applicability of subsection (8)(d). Subsection (8)(d), requiring 30 sales of comparable properties within county in order to establish sales ratio for properties within that county, does not apply to the market valuation of property for property tax purposes. Sonnenberg & Sons v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 768 P.2d 748 (Colo. App. 1988), aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 797 P.2d 27 ( Colo. 1990 ).

Abuse of discretion by BAA exists where board failed to consider evidence of value of similar properties in other counties in Colorado and other states for purposes of property tax assessment. Platinum Props. v. Assess. Appeals Bd., 738 P.2d 34 (Colo. App. 1987).

Under subsection (9), if property is partially put to residential use and partially put to commercial hotel use, a mixed-use classification and allocation is appropriate. The primary factor to be considered in determining the proper classification for tax purposes is the actual use of the property on the relevant assessment date. E.R. Southtech, Ltd. v. BOE, 972 P.2d 1057 (Colo. App. 1998).

BAA's ruling assigning a mixed-use classification to the subject property based on the breakdown of stays of less than 30 days and stays of 30 days or more is supported by the evidentiary record and has a reasonable basis in law. Thus, under the applicable standard of review, the BAA's classification determination will not be disturbed on review. E.R. Southtech, Ltd. v. BOE, 972 P.2d 1057 (Colo. App. 1998).

The determination as to the appropriate allocation percentages to be assigned to the residential and commercial uses of the property was a question of fact for the BAA to decide, based on its evaluation of the evidence presented. Because the BAA's factual determination in this regard is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record as a whole, its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal. E.R. Southtech, Ltd. v. BOE, 972 P.2d 1057 (Colo. App. 1998).

Taxation of development rights separately from the common elements does not contravene subsection (10). The assignment of the development rights evinced the intent to sever title to the development rights from the condominiums, including severance from the common elements. Vill. at Treehouse v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2014 COA 6 , 321 P.3d 624.

Cost cap valuation method under subsection (13) does not apply to a public utility, which is assessed under the valuation method established in part 4 of this article. Qwest v. Colo. Div. of Prop. Taxation, 2013 CO 39, 304 P.3d 217.

The assessor and the BAA are unambiguously required to give consideration to the factors set forth in subsection (14)(b), when determining the actual value of vacant land using the market approach. The assessor may not avoid this requirement by claiming that 80% of the lots within the "market area" had been "developed". When determining whether 80% of the lots of the subdivision within which the vacant land is located have been sold, some general concept of a "market area" may not be substituted for the specific area included within the boundaries of the approved plat for that subdivision. Sunbelt Serv. Corp. v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 802 P.2d 1199 (Colo. App. 1990).

Subsection (14)(b) does not require the assessor to apply the anticipated market absorption rate. This is true even though the assessor and the property tax administrator have determined that the application of such rate is not appropriate. El Paso County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Craddock, 850 P.2d 702 (Colo. 1993).

Although the anticipated market absorption rate must be taken into account when assessing vacant land, other factors may lead the assessor to conclude that the application of such rate is not appropriate. El Paso County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Craddock, 850 P.2d 702 (Colo. 1993).

The factors listed in subsection (14)(b) must be taken into account by assessors, but the general assembly did not direct that assessors be limited to those factors. El Paso County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Craddock, 850 P.2d 702 (Colo. 1993).

Trial court erred in interpreting subsection (14)(b) as requiring both consideration and application of the market absorption rate. Although the anticipated market absorption rate must be considered, when assessing vacant land, its application is not mandatory. The assessor may take into account other factors, including the similarity of the tracts or their anticipated use, which may lead to the conclusion that the application of the market absorption rate is not appropriate. The assessor must document those factors, however, to allow meaningful review of its decision. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Arapahoe County, 860 P.2d 1383 (Colo. App. 1993).

Market absorption rate is intended to be used in conjunction with comparable sales data in order to insure that the time and up-front costs connected with selling a quantity of individual lots have been reflected in the valuation. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 904 P.2d 1363 (Colo. App. 1995).

BAA correctly interpreted subsection (14) to include developer's profit and overhead in the cost of development which may be deducted from the valuation of vacant land. Commercial Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Douglas County, 867 P.2d 17 (Colo. App. 1993).

Subsection (14) as in effect prior to the 1992 amendment required assessors to take indirect costs into account when valuing vacant land under the market approach. The 1992 amendment to this subsection was found to have changed, rather than clarified, the earlier version of the statute because the legislative history does not evince a clear intent to merely clarify the language of the statute. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz. v. Fid. Castle Pines, 890 P.2d 119 (Colo. 1995).

Subsection (14)(b), prohibiting assessors from considering the indirect costs of development in ascertaining the assessment value of vacant land under the present worth valuation method does not violate article X, § 3 of the Colorado Constitution, which requires the assessor to determine the actual value of property. Fid. Castle Pines, Ltd. v. State, 948 P.2d 26 (Colo. App. 1997).

Subsection (14)(b) does not violate article X, § 3 of the Colorado Constitution by creating a separate class of commercial property, nor does it create an unreasonable classification of commercial property. Fid. Castle Pines, Ltd. v. State, 948 P.2d 26 (Colo. App. 1997).

When the assessor presents evidence of all three approaches to valuation, it would impose an onerous and unnecessary burden also to require the taxpayer to provide those valuations. Because neither the constitution nor the statute imposes such a requirement, the court will not so interpret them. Principal Mut. Ins. v. Bd. of Equaliz., 890 P.2d 273 (Colo. App. 1994).

Valuation based upon assessor's formulation of an open space acquisition rate determined from a sales average of unbuildable land in the county was appropriate when the cost, market, and income approaches could not be used. Hughey v. Jefferson County Bd. of Comm'rs, 921 P.2d 76 (Colo. App. 1996).

While equalization of the basis for taxation is the end sought to be achieved by uniform laws and by uniform means and methods of assessment, perfect uniformity in actual assessment is not required under either this section or the constitution. Crocog Co. v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 813 P.2d 768 (Colo. App. 1990); Bishop v. Colo. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 899 P.2d 251 (Colo. App. 1994).

Taxpayers who protest property tax assessments have the burden of proving that the assessment is incorrect. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988); 501 So. Cherry J. Venture v. Arapahoe County, 817 P.2d 583 (Colo. App. 1991).

Property tax valuation challenge. A taxpayer has the statutory right to challenge a property tax valuation for each tax year under the protest and adjustment procedure and possibly through de novo evidentiary proceedings before the BAA. Weingarten v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 876 P.2d 118 (Colo. App. 1994).

Where the record shows that the method used in determining an actual value for assessment purposes was one specified by statute, taxpayers are precluded from protesting utilization of such method. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

In order to adopt the taxpayer's valuation, the court must find that the taxpayer's expert complied with the property tax administrator's guidelines. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Arapahoe County, 860 P.2d 1383 (Colo. App. 1993).

Where neighboring property was erroneously assessed during one tax year and the assessment was later corrected, complaining taxpayer has no standing to seek an order mandating a reassessment of the parcel erroneously assessed, and the court lacks authority to grant such relief. Crocog Co. v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 813 P.2d 768 (Colo. App. 1990); Bishop v. Colo. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 899 P.2d 251 (Colo. App. 1994).

Subsection (5) reflects legislative intent to allow reclassification upon a change of actual use. Nothing in the statute indicates that the provisions of subsection (5) are inapplicable to residential real property. Mission Viejo v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equaliz., 881 P.2d 462 (Colo. App. 1994).

Abandoned and uninhabited structure that did not contribute to the value of the property should be disregarded rather than valued separately. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Arapahoe County, 860 P.2d 1383 (Colo. App. 1993).

Abandoned farmhouse on otherwise vacant parcel was "minor structure" within the meaning of administrative guidelines defining vacant land for purposes of determining whether the market absorption rate applied to the parcel. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 904 P.2d 1363 (Colo. App. 1995).

Collateral estoppel does not bind the assessor with respect to property tax exemptions except as to the tax year actually at issue in the prior administrative proceedings. Guest Mansions, Inc. v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 899 P.2d 944 (Colo. App. 1995).

Trial court did not err in accepting mass appraisal method of valuation in valuing 20 vacant residential lots. C.P. & Son v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 953 P.2d 1303 (Colo. App. 1998).

Tax-exempt areas outside building footprints at a federally funded public airport were properly excluded under subsection (17)(a)(II)(B) from valuation of leased parcels that were taxable possessory interests. Such areas are to be included in the valuation of a possessory interest in tax-exempt property only if the holder of the possessory interest has an exclusive right to possess and use the areas that is absolute and the areas included paved lanes running to and from runways, terminals, aircraft hangars, and other facilities that the holder could not exclude others from using under the terms of the lease. Denver jetCenter, Inc. v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 148 P.3d 228 (Colo. App. 2006).

Applied in Golden Gate Dev. v. Gilpin Cty. Bd., 856 P.2d 72 (Colo. App. 1993).

39-1-103.5. Restrictions on information.

The state board of equalization or the administrator shall not require any person to furnish financial information concerning commercial or industrial property, except as to the value of the real property for rental purposes only. This section shall not apply to public utilities.

Source: L. 77: Entire section added, p. 1731, § 3, effective June 20.

39-1-103.8. Valuation for assessment - future increases. (Repealed)

Source: L. 2020: Entire section added, (SB 20-223), ch. 291, p. 1436, § 1, effective January 1, 2021. L. 2021: Entire section repealed, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1806, § 1, effective June 23.

Editor's note: Section 5(2) of chapter 291 (SB 20-223), Session Laws of Colorado 2020, provides that this section takes effect on the date of the governor's proclamation or January 1, 2021, whichever is later, only if, at the November 2020 statewide election, a majority of voters approve the ballot issue referred in accordance with section 2 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 20-001. The ballot issue, referred to voters as amendment B, was approved on November 3, 2020, and was proclaimed by the Governor on December 31, 2020. The vote count for the measure was as follows:

FOR: : 1,740,395

AGAINST: : 1,285,136

39-1-104. Valuation for assessment - definitions.

  1. The valuation for assessment of all taxable property in the state shall be twenty-nine percent of the actual value thereof as determined by the assessor and the administrator in the manner prescribed by law, and such percentage shall be uniformly applied, without exception, to the actual value, so determined, of the real and personal property located within the territorial limits of the authority levying a property tax, and all property taxes shall be levied against the aggregate valuation for assessment resulting from the application of such percentage. This subsection (1) only applies to nonresidential property that is classified as lodging property.

    (1.5) Repealed.

    1. (1.6) (a) Hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, and personal property located at a hotel, motel, or bed and breakfast are classified as lodging property, which is a subclass of nonresidential property for purposes of the valuation for assessment. Classification as a lodging property does not affect a partial allocation as residential real property if a lodging property is a mixed-use property.
    2. Real and personal property valued under section 39-4-102 (1)(e) or (1.5) or section 39-5-104.7 is classified as renewable energy production property, which is a subclass of nonresidential property for purposes of the valuation for assessment.
    3. Real and personal agricultural property is a subclass of nonresidential property for purposes of the valuation for assessment.

    1. (1.8) (a) The valuation for assessment of real and personal property that is classified as agricultural property or renewable energy production property is twenty-nine percent of the actual value thereof; except that, for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, the valuation for assessment of this property is temporarily reduced to twenty-six and four-tenths percent of the actual value thereof.
    2. The valuation for assessment of all nonresidential property that is not specified in subsection (1) or (1.8)(a) of this section is twenty-nine percent of the actual value thereof.
    3. The actual value of real and personal property specified in subsection (1.8)(a) or (1.8)(b) of this section is determined by the assessor and the administrator in the manner prescribed by law, and a valuation for assessment percentage is uniformly applied, without exception, to the actual value, so determined, of the various classes and subclasses of real and personal property located within the territorial limits of the authority levying a property tax, and all property taxes are levied against the aggregate valuation for assessment resulting from the application of the percentage.
    4. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, "nonresidential property" means all taxable real and personal property in the state other than residential real property, producing mines, or lands or leaseholds producing oil or gas. Nonresidential property includes the subclasses of agricultural property, lodging property, and renewable energy production property for purposes of the ratio of valuation for assessment.
  2. Repealed.
  3. "Valuation for assessment", as used in this section and in articles 1 to 13 of this title, means the same as the term "assessed valuation" as that term may appear in the laws of this state.
  4. Except as provided in section 39-7-109, nonproducing severed mineral interests are to be valued at twenty-nine percent of actual value in the same manner as other real property specified in subsection (1.8)(b) of this section. Such valuation shall be determined by the assessing officer only upon preponderant evidence shown by such officer that the cost approach, market approach, and income approach result in uniform and just and equal valuation.
  5. to (10.1) Repealed.
    1. (10.2) (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (12) of this section, beginning with the property tax year which commences January 1, 1989, a reassessment cycle shall be instituted with each cycle consisting of two full calendar years. At the beginning of each reassessment cycle, the level of value to be used during the reassessment cycle in the determination of actual value of real property in any county of the state as reflected in the abstract of assessment for each year in the reassessment cycle shall advance by two years over what was used in the previous reassessment cycle; except that the level of value to be used for the years 1989 and 1990 shall be the level of value for the period of one and one-half years immediately prior to July 1, 1988; except that, if comparable valuation data is not available from such one-and-one-half-year period to adequately determine the level of value for a class of property, the period of five years immediately prior to July 1, 1988, shall be utilized to determine the level of value. Said level of value shall be adjusted to the final day of the data gathering period.
    2. During the two years of each reassessment cycle, in preparation for implementation in the succeeding reassessment cycle, the respective assessors shall conduct revaluations of all taxable real property utilizing the level of value for the period which will be used to determine actual value in such succeeding reassessment cycle and the manuals and associated data published for the period which will be used to determine actual value in such succeeding reassessment cycle.
    3. Repealed.
    4. For the purposes of this article and article 9 of this title, "level of value" means the actual value of taxable real property as ascertained by the applicable factors enumerated in section 39-1-103 (5) for the one-and-one-half-year period immediately prior to July 1 immediately preceding the assessment date for which the administrator is required by this article to publish manuals and associated data. Beginning with the property tax year commencing January 1, 1999, if comparable valuation data is not available from such one-and-one-half-year period to adequately determine such actual value for a class of property, "level of value" means the actual value of taxable real property as ascertained by said applicable factors for such one-and-one-half-year period, the six-month period immediately preceding such one-and-one-half-year period, and as many preceding six-month periods within the five-year period immediately prior to July 1 immediately preceding the assessment date as are necessary to obtain adequate comparable valuation data. Said level of value shall be adjusted to the final day of the data-gathering period.
    5. Repealed.

    (10.3) Repealed. (11) (a) (I) It is the intent of the general assembly, as manifested in subsection (10.2) of this section, that, when a change occurs in reassessment cycles as prescribed in said subsection, new manuals and associated data will be published by the administrator, pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e) , and that said manuals and associated data and the level of value for the year that said manuals and associated data are published shall be utilized by assessors in the manner described in subsection (10.2) of this section for determining the actual value of real property in each county of the state. (II) The general assembly hereby further finds and declares that it is the intent of paragraph (b) of this subsection (11) to comply with the provisions of section 3 of article X of the state constitution, including the provision which requires the enactment of "general laws, which shall prescribe such methods and regulations as shall secure just and equalized valuations for assessments of all real and personal property"; to reduce the confusion of the owners of taxable property within the state concerning assessment procedures and valuations of such property; to achieve valuations for assessment which represent the current value of such property to the extent which is equitably and practically possible; and to minimize the costs associated with achieving such current valuations for assessment. (b) (I) The provisions of subsection (10.2) of this section are not intended to prevent the assessor from taking into account, in determining actual value for the years which intervene between changes in the level of value, any unusual conditions in or related to any real property which would result in an increase or decrease in actual value. If any real property has not been assessed at its correct level of value, the assessor shall revalue such property for the intervening year so that the actual value of such property will be its correct level of value; however, the assessor shall not revalue such property above or below its correct level of value except as necessary to reflect the increase or decrease in actual value attributable to an unusual condition. For the purposes of this paragraph (b) and except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b), an unusual condition which could result in an increase or decrease in actual value is limited to the installation of an on-site improvement, the ending of the economic life of an improvement with only salvage value remaining, the addition to or remodeling of a structure, a change of use of the land, the creation of a condominium ownership of real property as recognized in the "Condominium Ownership Act", article 33 of title 38, C.R.S., any new regulations restricting or increasing the use of the land, or a combination thereof, the installation and operation of surface equipment relating to oil and gas wells on agricultural land, any detrimental acts of nature, and any damage due to accident, vandalism, fire, or explosion. When taking into account such unusual conditions which would increase or decrease the actual value of a property, the assessor must relate such changes to the level of value as if the conditions had existed at that time. (II) The creation of a condominium ownership of real property by the conversion of an existing structure shall be taken into account as an unusual condition as provided for in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b) by the assessor, when at least fifty-one percent of the condominium units, as defined in section 38-33-103 (1) , C.R.S., in a multiunit property subject to condominium ownership have been sold and conveyed to bona fide purchasers and deeds have been recorded therefor. (c) Repealed. (12) (a) For the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, producing mines shall be valued for assessment solely pursuant to article 6 of this title. (b) For the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, oil and gas leaseholds and lands shall be valued for assessment solely pursuant to section 39-7-102 . (c) Repealed.

    (12.1) Repealed.

    1. (12.2) (a) Except as provided in subsection (12) of this section, for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, the requirement stated in subsections (10.2) and (11) of this section that the actual value of real property be determined according to a specified year's level of value and manuals and associated data published by the administrator for said specified year pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e) shall apply to the assessment of all classes of real property, including but not limited to the following classes of real property:
      1. (Deleted by amendment, L. 87, p. 1390 , § 2, effective April 1, 1987.)
      2. (Deleted by amendment, L. 87, p. 1392 , § 2, effective April 1, 1987.)
      3. Operating property and plants of public utilities; and
      4. Agricultural land.
      5. (Deleted by amendment, L. 87, p. 1385 , § 1, effective June 20, 1987.)
    2. This subsection (12.2) shall take effect January 1, 1987.

      1. (12.3) (a) (I) The actual value of personal property is determined by appropriate consideration of such of the three approaches specified in section 39-1-103 (5)(a) as are applicable to the appraisal of such property and is based on the property's value in use. Subject to review and approval pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e), the administrator shall prepare and publish appraisal procedures and instructions for the annual appraisal of such property that include a definition of "value in use" and a factor or factors to adjust the actual value for the current year of assessment to the level of value applicable to real property.
      2. In determining actual value, depreciation attributable to age shall not exceed that for the actual age of the property on the assessment date. Physical, functional, and economic obsolescence shall be considered in determining actual value.
    1. Repealed.

    (12.4) For property tax years commencing on and after January 1, 1987, the requirement stated in subsections (10.2) to (11) of this section that the actual value of real property be determined according to a specified year's level of value and manuals and associated data published by the administrator for said specified year pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e) shall not apply to the assessment of producing coal mines and other lands producing nonmetallic minerals. (13)Repealed. (14)Repealed. (15) Repealed. (16) (a) During each property tax year, the director of research of the legislative council shall contract with a private person for a valuation for assessment study to be conducted as set forth in this subsection (16). The study shall be conducted in all counties of the state to determine whether or not the assessor of each county has, in fact, used all manuals, formulas, and other directives required by law to arrive at the valuation for assessment of each and every class of real and personal property in the county. The person conducting the study shall sample each class of property in a statistically valid manner, and the aggregate of such sampling shall equal at least one percent of all properties in each county of the state. The sampling shall show that the various areas, ages of buildings, economic conditions, and uses of properties have been sampled. Such study shall be completed, and a final report of the findings and conclusions thereof shall be submitted to the state board of equalization, by September 15 of the year in which the study is conducted. (b) During each property tax year, beginning with the property tax year which commences January 1, 1985, in addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection (16), the study shall set forth the aggregate valuation for assessment of each county for the year in which the study is conducted. (c) The person conducting any valuation for assessment study pursuant to this subsection (16) and his employees shall, during the term of his contract, have access to any document in the custody of the administrator or an assessor, including, but not limited to, such documents as are held pursuant to sections 39-4-103 , 39-5-120 , and 39-14-102 (1)(c) . The penalties in section 39-1-116 apply against the divulging at any time of any confidential information obtained pursuant to this paragraph (c). (d) Repealed.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 676, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-4. L. 65: p. 1096, § 2. L. 67: p. 946, § 5. L. 70: pp. 380, 388, §§ 10, 28. L. 73: p. 1430 § 1. L. 75: (5) and (6) added, pp. 863, 1474, §§ 2, 1, effective July 1; (7) added, p. 1454, § 1, effective July 30. L. 76: (9) added, p. 755, § 5, effective July 1; (8) added, p. 755, § 4, effective January 1, 1977. L. 77: (10) R&RE and (11) and (12) added, pp. 1731, 1732, §§ 4, 5, effective June 20. L. 79: (13) added, p. 1329, § 2, effective May 8; (6) R&RE and (14) added, pp. 1403, 1327, §§ 1, 4, effective July 1; (2) amended, p. 1402, § 1, effective January 1, 1980. L. 80: (10) amended, p. 714, § 1, effective February 29; (9) amended, p. 711, § 1, effective April 16. L. 81: (13)(b) amended, p. 1836, § 1, effective June 4; (9)(a), (10)(a), (10)(b), and IP(12) amended, p. 1830, § 2, effective June 12; (12)(c), (12)(d), (12)(g), and (12)(h) amended, pp. 1848, 1854, §§ 4, 2, effective January 1, 1982; (16) added, p. 1397, § 8, effective January 1, 1983. L. 82: (11)(b) amended, p. 553, § 1, effective May 3; (16) amended, p. 457, § 2, effective January 1, 1983. L. 83: (2), (7), and (12.3)(b) repealed and (12.3)(a)(I) and (16) amended, pp. 1485, 1482, §§ 11, 3, effective April 22; (10), (11)(a), (11)(b)(I), and (12)(h) amended and (10.1), (12.1), and (12.2) added, pp. 1494, 1495, §§ 1, 2, effective April 28; (5) repealed, p. 2081, § 1, effective January 1, 1984. L. 84: (15) repealed, p. 999, § 3, effective January 1; (10), (10.1)(a), (12)(h), (12.1), IP(12.2)(a), and (12.2)(b) amended, p. 988, § 1, effective February 23. L. 85: (4) amended, p. 1212, § 8, effective May 9. L. 86: (16)(a) amended, p. 1101, § 1, effective March 26. L. 87: (16)(c) added, p. 1417, § 1, effective March 13; (12)(a) RC&RE and (12.2)(a) amended, p. 1390, §§ 1, 2, effective April 1; (12)(b) RC&RE and (12.2)(a) amended, p. 1392, §§ 1, 2, effective April 1; (1.5) added, p. 1384, § 1, effective April 16; (6), (13), and (14) repealed, p. 1304, § 1, effective May 20; (9)(a), (9)(b), and (10) repealed, (10.1) R&RE, (11)(b)(I) and (12.2)(a) amended, and (12)(c) and (12.4) added, pp. 1388, 1386, 1385, §§ 6(1), 3, 1, 5, 2, effective June 20; (1) amended, p. 1383, § 1, effective July 10; (10.3) added, p. 1387, § 4, effective January 1, 1991; (9)(d) and (11)(c) added by revision, p. 1388, § 6(2). L. 88: (8) repealed, (9)(c), (9)(d), (10.1)(b), (10.3)(a), (11)(a), (11)(b)(I), (11)(c), and (12.3)(a) amended, (10.1)(d) R&RE, and (10.2) added, pp. 1275, 1269, 1273, 1270, §§ 14, 5, 6, 5, effective May 29; (1.5) R&RE, (16)(c) amended, and (16)(d) added, pp. 1279, 1282, §§ 2, 5, effective January 1, 1989; L. 89: (11)(b)(I) amended, p. 1450, § 2, effective June 7; (10.3)(c) amended, p. 1644, § 8, effective January 1, 1991. L. 90: (16)(d) repealed, p. 1840, § 19, effective May 31; (12)(c) repealed and (16)(a) and (16)(c) amended, pp. 1705, 1689, §§ 41, 4, effective June 9. L. 91: (10.2)(c), (10.3)(a), (11)(a)(I), (11)(b)(I), and (12.4) amended and (10.2)(e) and (11)(c) repealed, pp. 2003, 2005, §§ 1, 5, effective June 6. L. 92: (11)(b)(I) amended, p. 2212, § 10, effective June 3. L. 93: (7) repealed, p. 1689, § 8, effective June 6. L. 94: (11)(b)(I) amended, p. 309, § 1, effective March 22. L. 95: (10.2)(c) and (10.3) repealed, p. 7, § 1, effective March 9. L. 96: (11)(a)(I), IP(12.2)(a), (12.3)(a)(I), and (12.4) amended, pp. 1198, 1199, §§ 1, 2, effective June 1. L. 99: (10.2)(d) amended, p. 202, § 1, effective August 4. L. 2002: (16)(a) amended, p. 861, § 1, effective August 7. L. 2005: (IP)(12.2)(a) amended, p. 781, § 72, effective June 1. L. 2020: (1.5) repealed, (SB 20-223), ch. 291, p. 1436, § 2, effective January 1, 2021. L. 2021: (1) and (4) amended and (1.6) and (1.8) added, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1806, § 2, effective June 23; (12.3)(a)(I) amended, (HB 21-1312), ch. 299, p. 1792, § 5, effective July 1.

Editor's note:

  1. Subsection (12.1) provided for the repeal of subsections (12) and (12.1), effective January 1, 1987. (See L. 84, p. 988 .)
  2. Subsection (9)(d) provided for the repeal of subsections (9)(c) and (9)(d), effective January 1, 1989. (See L. 88, p. 1269 .)
  3. Subsection (10.1)(d) provided for the repeal of subsection (10.1), effective January 1, 1991. (See L. 88, p. 1273 .)
  4. Section 5(2) of chapter 291 (SB 20-223), Session Laws of Colorado 2020, provides that changes to this section take effect on the date of the governor's proclamation or January 1, 2021, whichever is later, only if, at the November 2020 statewide election, a majority of voters approve the ballot issue referred in accordance with section 2 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 20-001. The ballot issue, referred to voters as amendment B, was approved on November 3, 2020, and was proclaimed by the Governor on December 31, 2020. The vote count for the measure was as follows:

FOR: : 1,740,395

AGAINST: : 1,285,136

Cross references: (1) For constitutional provisions concerning taxation, see article X of the state constitution; for the provision that sets the valuation for assessment of residential real property at 21%, see § 3 (1)(b) of article X of the state constitution.

(2) For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1312, see section 1 of chapter 299, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Property Tax Assessments in Colorado", see 12 Colo. Law. 563 (1983). For article, "Appealing Property Tax Assessments", see 15 Colo. Law. 798 (1986). For article, "Delinquent Oil and Gas Ad Valorem Taxes: Protecting Property Interests", see 16 Colo. Law. 798 (1987).

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.

General assembly may constitutionally classify movable structures differently than conventional residences for tax purposes. Am. Mobile Home Ass'n v. Dolan, 191 Colo. 433 , 553 P.2d 758 (1976).

When cyclical revaluation plan deemed unconstitutional. A cyclical revaluation plan is violative of constitutional equality and uniformity standards only where its implementation results in intentional discrimination, arbitrary action, constructive fraud, or grossly and relatively unfair assessments. Nuttall v. Leffingwell, 193 Colo. 137 , 563 P.2d 356 (1977).

This section does not constitute retrospective legislation in violation of constitution. A change in the method of valuation during the year for which the assessment was made does not constitute retrospective legislation. Martin v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 707 P.2d 348 (Colo. 1985) (decided under law in effect prior to 1983 amendment).

It is duty of tax assessor to tax uniformly. Citizens' Comm. for Fair Prop. Taxation v. Warner, 127 Colo. 121 , 254 P.2d 1005 (1953).

All taxable property need not be revalued before individual revaluations are entered on the tax rolls. Nuttall v. Leffingwell, 193 Colo. 137 , 563 P.2d 356 (1977).

Federal statute prohibiting discriminatory tax treatment of airline property under provisions of this section does not apply retroactively to property taxes assessed prior to effective date of federal statute. State Bd. of Equaliz. v. Am. Airlines, 773 P.2d 1033 (Colo. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851, 110 S. Ct. 151, 105 L. Ed. 2d 109 (1989).

Depreciation required to be calculated annually from the base year to the date of assessment for valuing personal business property. BQP Industries v. State Bd. of Equaliz., 694 P.2d 337 (Colo. App. 1984).

Statute does not permit consideration of subsequent economic conditions in determining property's base year value. Carrera Place v. Bd. of Equaliz., 761 P.2d 197 (Colo. 1988) (decided under law in effect prior to 1987 amendments).

Thus, additional hotel rooms that had not yet been constructed during the base period could not be considered in calculating the occupancy rate used to determine the actual value of a hotel for purposes of property taxation. Padre Resort, Inc. v. Jefferson County Bd. of Equaliz., 30 P.3d 813 (Colo. App. 2001).

It is proper for the board to consider evidence of other sales of comparable property within the base period which were similarly subject to long-term leases. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. City and County of Denver, 829 P.2d 1319 (Colo. App. 1991), aff'd, 848 P.2d 355 ( Colo. 1993 ).

Evidence of property tax valuations of the property for prior tax years is relevant to valuation issues concerning the current tax year, especially when the prior tax year is in the same reassessment cycle and the valuation is determined using the same base period. Weingarten v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 876 P.2d 118 (Colo. App. 1994).

Comparative sales data must be adjusted for time. In case where property owner appealed county assessor's valuation of the property to the board of assessment appeals, the board erred in reaching an alternative valuation without applying a time adjustment to the comparable sales data on which it relied. Adjustment for time under subsections (10.2)(a) and (10.2)(d) is not discretionary, but mandatory. Kidder v. Chaffee County Bd., 312 P.3d 1181 (Colo. App. 2011).

Correction of incorrect value in intervening year required. When an assessor learns of an incorrect assessment, subsection (11)(b)(I) requires the assessor to correct the assessment in an intervening year in order to set the value at what it would have been set at in the assessment year if the mistake had not occurred. Further adjustments to the value, however, cannot be made in an intervening year absent proof of an unusual condition. Thibodeau v. Denver County Bd. Comm'rs, 2018 COA 124 , 428 P.3d 706.

Although an assessor is not prevented from taking into account any unusual conditions related to real property which would result in an increase or decrease in actual value and may revalue property for an intervening year to rectify an incorrect base value assessment, an assessor may not revalue a property in an intervening year that has been correctly assessed, except as necessary to reflect the increase or decrease in actual value attributable to an unusual condition. Leavell-Rio Grande v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 753 P.2d 797 (Colo. App. 1988).

Unusual conditions affecting actual value are factors for consideration by the assessor in assessing real property. Depreciation factors apply only to personal property. CF & I Steel Corp. v. Patton, 765 P.2d 586 (Colo. App. 1988), rev'd on other grounds, 785 P.2d 605 ( Colo. 1990 ).

"Unusual conditions" are set forth in two distinct provisions, of which one is limited and exclusive and the other is broadly inclusive. Where a contract for purchase and sale of the subject property was entered into in an intervening year, resulting in a difference in valuation of more than ten percent when compared with the valuation in effect during the normally applicable base period, evidence of the sale price was relevant under this section and should have been considered. Roberts v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 883 P.2d 588 (Colo. App. 1994).

"Unusual conditions" provisions apply to individual properties, not only to all properties in an entire neighborhood of like properties. Roberts v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 883 P.2d 588 (Colo. App. 1994).

Evidence relating to the amount stipulated to in adjudicatory proceedings and not to the assessor's original base period valuation was irrelevant as a matter of law to the unusual condition exception. Lowe Denver Hotel Ass'n v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 890 P.2d 257 (Colo. App. 1995).

The cost to cure environmental contamination, when mandated by a governmental entity, should be deducted from the valuation of the property for ad valorem tax purposes. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Douglas County Bd. of Equaliz., 75 P.3d 1129 (Colo. App. 2003).

E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. cited above does not address the exact manner in which governmentally ordered remediation costs to cure environmental contamination are to be deducted under the income approach, nor does it mandate any specific methodology, or require the deduction of the entire cost of remediation. Here, methodology of estimating annual income, subtraction of an annual cost to cure, and application of a capitalization rate to arrive at a taxable value of property capable of generating income is in conformity with the direct capitalization method of the income approach and supported by competent evidence. Microsemi Corp. v. Broomfield County Bd. of Equaliz., 200 P.3d 1123 (Colo. App. 2008).

A shut down of a portion of a plant does not constitute a change in the use of the land. LaDuke v. CF & I Steel Corp., 785 P.2d 605 (Colo. 1990).

The general assembly intended to authorize assessors to make "corrective" intervening year revaluations only when the assessor's original base period valuation for the first year of the reassessment cycle is subsequently asserted to be incorrect and, therefore, in need of correction. Lowe Denver Hotel Ass'n v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 890 P.2d 257 (Colo. App. 1995).

Statute does not authorize assessors to make intervening revaluations when the valuation for the first year of the cycle has been determined in adjudicatory proceedings resulting from taxpayer protests or appeals. Lowe Denver Hotel Ass'n v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 890 P.2d 257 (Colo. App. 1995).

Section 39-1-103 (8)(a)(I), not subsection (12.3) of this section, applies to the valuation of real property. Since the 18-month time limitation for information used in property valuation applies exclusively to real property, the computer pricing guides used by the taxpayer need not conform to those time limitations. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. IBM Credit Corp., 888 P.2d 250 (Colo. 1995).

Obsolescence may be a relevant factor in determining the actual value of personal property. IBM Credit Corp. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 870 P.2d 535 (Colo. App. 1993).

Under subsection (12.3), if an approach to value is applicable, it must be given appropriate consideration by the assessor, as well as by the board of assessment appeals, as the trier of fact. Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Pueblo County Bd. of Comm'rs, 50 P.3d 916 (Colo. App. 2002).

Applied in First Nat'l Bank v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 36 Colo. 265 , 84 P. 1111 (1906); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 628 P.2d 156 (Colo. App. 1981).

39-1-104.1. Implementation costs - annual revaluation. (Repealed)

Source: L. 87: Entire section added, p. 1389, § 10, effective June 21. L. 95: Entire section repealed, p. 9, § 5, effective March 9.

39-1-104.2. Adjustment of residential rate - legislative declaration - definitions.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Multi-family residential real property" means residential real property that is a duplex, triplex, or multi-structure of four or more units, all of which are based on the class codes established in the manual published by the administrator. Multi-family residential real property is a subclass of residential real property for purposes of the ratio of valuation for assessment.
    2. "Target percentage" means the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment represented by the valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property in the year immediately preceding the year in which a change in the level of value occurs.
  2. After careful consideration of all available information, the general assembly hereby finds and declares that the action of the first session of the fifty-sixth general assembly which set the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property at eighteen percent has produced a deviation from the intent of section 3 of article X of the state constitution which ensures that the percentage of the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property shall remain the same as it was in the year immediately preceding the year in which a change occurs in the level of value used in determining actual value. Therefore, the general assembly finds that legislation is necessary for the following purposes: To adjust the residential rate for 1988; to ensure that deviations from the constitutional mandate set forth in section 3 of article X of the state constitution shall not be perpetuated into this or any future year; and to provide a process for future adjustments in the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property.
    1. The general assembly, pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, but before January 1, 1989, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property fails to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1986, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1985 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment plus the increased valuation for assessment attributable to new construction and to increased volume of mineral and oil and gas production which occurred during 1986. Therefore, for the property tax year commencing January 1, 1988, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be sixteen percent of actual value.
    2. The general assembly, pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1989, but before January 1, 1991, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property fails to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1988, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1987 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 44.51 percent, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1989, but before January 1, 1991, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be fifteen percent of actual value.
    3. The general assembly, pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1991, but before January 1, 1993, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property fails to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1990, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1989 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 44.57 percent, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1991, but before January 1, 1993, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 14.34 percent of actual value.
    4. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1993, but before January 1, 1995, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment which is attributable to residential real property will fail to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1992, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1991 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 44.73 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 12.86 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1993, but before January 1, 1995.
    5. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1995, but before January 1, 1997, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will fail to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1994, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1993 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 45.29 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 10.36 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1995, but before January 1, 1997.
    6. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1997, but before January 1, 1999, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will fail to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1996, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1995 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 46.17 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 9.74 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1997, but before January 1, 1999.
    7. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1999, but before January 1, 2001, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will fail to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 1998, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1997 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 46.49 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 9.74 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1999, but before January 1, 2001.
    8. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2001, but before January 1, 2003, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will fail to remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2000, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 1999 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 46.61 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 9.15 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2001, but before January 1, 2003.
    9. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2003, but before January 1, 2005, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will not remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2002, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 2001 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 47.08 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2003, but before January 1, 2005.
    10. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2005, but before January 1, 2007, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will not remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2004, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 2003 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 47.22 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2005, but before January 1, 2007.
    11. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, but before January 1, 2009, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will not remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2006, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 2005 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 47.43 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, but before January 1, 2009.
    12. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2009, but before January 1, 2011, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will not remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2008, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 2007 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 46.82 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2009, but before January 1, 2011.
    13. Pursuant to the authority granted in section 3 of article X of the state constitution, the general assembly finds and declares that, for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2011, but before January 1, 2013, the percentage of aggregate statewide valuation for assessment that is attributable to residential real property will not remain as it was in the property tax year commencing January 1, 2010, when the aggregate statewide valuation for assessment was based on the 2009 aggregate statewide valuation for assessment. Therefore, the administrator having determined pursuant to subsection (4) of this section that the target percentage is 46.53 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property shall be 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2011, but before January 1, 2013.
    14. Based on the determination by the administrator that the target percentage is 45.86 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property is 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2013, but before January 1, 2015.
    15. Based on the determination by the administrator that the target percentage is 45.67 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property is 7.96 percent of actual value for the property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2015, but before January 1, 2017.
    16. Based on the determination by the administrator that the target percentage is 45.76 percent, the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property is 7.2 percent of actual value for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2017, but before January 1, 2019.
    17. [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (3)(q) is effective until voters vote on a ballot measure concerning property tax reductions at the November 2021 statewide election. See the editor's note following this section.] The ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property is 7.15 percent of actual value for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2019, until the next property tax year that the general assembly adjusts the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property.

      (q) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (3)(q) is effective only if voters approve a ballot measure concerning property tax reductions at the November 2021 statewide election. See the editor's note following this section. ] The ratio of valuation for assessment for multi-family residential real property is 7.15 percent of actual value for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2019, until the next property tax year that the general assembly adjusts the ratio of valuation for assessment for residential real property.

      (q) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (3)(q) takes effect only if voters do not approve a ballot measure concerning property tax reductions at the November 2021 statewide election. See the editor's note following this section. ] The ratio of valuation for assessment for multi-family residential real property is 7.15 percent of actual value for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2019; except that, for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, the ratio of valuation for assessment for multi-family residential real property is temporarily reduced to 6.8 percent of actual value.

    18. The ratio of valuation for assessment for all residential real property other than multi-family residential real property is 7.15 percent of actual value; except that, for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, the ratio of valuation for assessment for all residential real property other than multi-family residential real property is temporarily reduced to 6.95 percent of actual value.
  3. to (7) Repealed.

Source: L. 88: Entire section added, p. 1276, § 1, effective January 1, 1989. L. 89: (3) and (7)(b) amended, p. 1450, § 3, effective June 7. L. 90: IP(7)(a) amended, p. 1689, § 5, effective June 9. L. 91: (3)(c) added and (4)(a), (6)(d), and (7)(b) amended, p. 1984, §§ 1, 2, effective April 11. L. 91, 2nd Ex. Sess.: (7)(b) amended, p. 100, § 1, effective September 25; IP(7)(a) and (7)(a)(II) amended, p. 101, § 1, effective October 7. L. 92: IP(7)(a) and (7)(b) amended, p. 2215, § 2, effective June 3. L. 93: (3)(d) added and (7) repealed, pp. 1876, 1689, §§ 1, 8, effective June 6. L. 95: (3)(e) added, p. 583, § 1, effective May 22. L. 97: (3)(f) added, p. 1149, § 1, effective May 28. L. 99: (3)(g) added, p. 505, § 1, effective April 30. L. 2001: (3)(h) added, p. 705, § 1, effective May 31. L. 2002: IP(6) amended, p. 861, § 2, effective August 7. L. 2003: (3)(i) added, p. 1970, § 1, effective May 22. L. 2005: (3)(j) added, p. 632, § 1, effective May 27. L. 2007: (3)(k) added, p. 1524, § 1, effective May 31. L. 2009: (3)(l) added, (HB 09-1360), ch. 362, p. 1875, § 1, effective June 1. L. 2011: (3)(m) added, (HB 11-1305), ch. 222, p. 956, § 1, effective May 27. L. 2013: (3)(n) added, (HB 13-1319), ch. 324, p. 1815, § 1, effective May 28. L. 2015: (3)(o) added, (HB 15-1357), ch. 312, p. 1276, § 1, effective June 5. L. 2017: (3)(p) added, (HB 17-1349), ch. 358, p. 1885, § 1, effective June 5. L. 2019: (3)(p) amended and (3)(q) added, (SB 19-255), ch. 433, p. 3745, § 1, effective June 3. L. 2020: (3)(q) amended and (4), (5), and (6) repealed, (SB 20-223), ch. 291, p. 1436, § 3, effective January 1, 2021. L. 2021: (1)(a) amended and (3)(r) added, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1808, § 3, effective June 23; (3)(q) amended, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1808, §§ 3, 4, effective (see editor's notes (2) and (3)).

Editor's note:

  1. Section 5(2) of chapter 291 (SB 20-223), Session Laws of Colorado 2020, provides that changes to this section take effect on the date of the governor's proclamation or January 1, 2021, whichever is later, only if, at the November 2020 statewide election, a majority of voters approve the ballot issue referred in accordance with section 2 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 20-001. The ballot issue, referred to voters as amendment B, was approved on November 3, 2020, and was proclaimed by the Governor on December 31, 2020. The vote count for the measure was as follows:
  2. Section 15(2) of chapter 301 (SB 21-293), Session Laws of Colorado 2021, provides that section 3 of the act changing subsection (3)(q) takes effect only if, at the November 2021 statewide election, a majority of voters approve a measure concerning property tax reductions, and, in which case, changes to subsection (3)(q) take effect simultaneously with the measure.
  3. Section 15(3) of chapter 301 (SB 21-293), Session Laws of Colorado 2021, provides that section 4 of the act changing subsection (3)(q) takes effect only if, at the November 2021 statewide election, a majority of voters do not approve a measure concerning property tax reductions or if there is no such measure on the ballot for the election, and, in either case, changes to subsection (3)(q) take effect on December 31, 2021.

FOR: : 1,740,395

AGAINST: : 1,285,136

39-1-104.5. Severed mineral interest - placement on tax roll.

Any owner of the surface estate from which a mineral interest has been severed, on behalf of himself and any other owners of such interest in the surface, may require the assessor of the county wherein such real estate is situate to place such severed mineral interest, without regard to value, on the tax roll of the county if the owner of the surface estate provides proof of ownership of the severed mineral interest and a record of the creation of the severed mineral interest as shown by the records of the county clerk and recorder. Proof of ownership and the record of creation of the severed mineral interest shall be provided in the form of a certificate prepared by an attorney, a title insurance company, or a title insurance agent authorized to do business in this state.

Source: L. 79: Entire section added, p. 1405, § 1, effective July 1. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 512, § 3, effective May 16.

39-1-105. Assessment date.

All taxable property, real and personal, within the state at twelve noon on the first day of January of each year, designated as the official assessment date, shall be listed, appraised, and valued for assessment in the county wherein it is located on the assessment date. Personal property shall be listed and valued separately from real property. Whenever construction of any new taxable building within the boundaries of a county occurs subsequent to the assessment date but before July 1 and such county has resolved to implement the procedures set out in section 39-5-132, such building shall be listed, appraised, and valued pursuant to section 39-5-132.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 677, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-5. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 1226, § 2, effective January 1, 1986. L. 86: Entire section amended, p. 1222, § 35, effective May 30.

Cross references: For property brought into the state after assessment date, see § 39-5-110; for property destroyed after the assessment date, see § 39-5-117; for the procedure for exclusion of property within a municipality from a special district and for the effect of such an exclusion order, see §§ 32-1-502 and 32-1-503.

ANNOTATION

This section does not mandate that January 1 is the date for determining tax exempt status for property owned by a charitable organization and does not address when the tax exempt status is to be determined. Family Tree Found. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 119 P.3d 581 (Colo. App. 2005).

City acquired an interest in the personal property prior to the date of the chapter 11 bankruptcy since the statute provides that a lien for ad valorem personal property taxes arises at 12 noon on the assessment date for the current year and such lien is a perpetual lien. Although the interest was an inchoate lien, the city was allowed to perfect it after the assessment date and thus have the lien relate back to the assessment date. Therefore the personal property taxes were a prepetition secured claim. In re W. States Distribs., Inc., 179 B.R. 666 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1995).

Applied in City & County of Denver v. Bd. of Dirs., 37 Colo. App. 496, 549 P.2d 1090 (1976); Martin v. Bd. of Assess. Appeals, 707 P.2d 348 ( Colo. 1985 ); Padgett v. Routt County Bd. of Equal., 857 P.2d 565 (Colo. App. 1993); Mission Viejo Co. v. Bd. of Equaliz., 942 P.2d 1251 (Colo. App. 1996).

39-1-105.5. Reappraisal ordered based on valuation for assessment study - state school finance payments.

    1. Repealed.
      1. Pursuant to section 39-1-104 (16)(b) for each property tax year beginning with the property tax year which commences January 1, 1985, the annual study shall, in addition to other requirements, determine and set forth the aggregate valuation for assessment of each county for the year in which the study is conducted.
        1. If the valuation for assessment of a county as reflected in its abstract for assessment for any property tax year beginning with the property tax year commencing January 1, 1985, is more than five percent below the valuation for assessment for such county as determined by the study conducted during the same property tax year, the state board of equalization shall cause to be performed a reappraisal of any class or classes of property that the study shows were not appraised consistent with the property tax provisions of the Colorado constitution or the statutes. The reappraisal must be performed during the next following year at the expense of the county; except that the state board of equalization may waive the requirement that the county reimburse the state for any costs incurred by the state in reappraising any class or classes of property if the county presents the state board with a plan to use the money retained to improve the functioning of the office of the county assessor. If the county fails to implement the plan submitted in a timely manner as agreed upon by the state board and the county, the state board shall revoke the waiver and require the county to reimburse the state for reappraisal costs incurred by the state. The reappraisal is the county's valuation for assessment with regard to the reappraised class or classes for the year in which the reappraisal is performed.
        2. Even though a county's aggregate valuation for assessment as reflected in its abstract for assessment for any property tax year beginning with the property tax year commencing January 1, 1985, is not more than five percent below the valuation for assessment for such county as determined by the study conducted during the same property tax year, the state board of equalization shall cause to be performed a reappraisal of any class or classes of property that the study shows were not appraised consistent with the property tax provisions of the Colorado constitution or the statutes. The reappraisal must be performed during the next following year at the expense of the county; except that the state board of equalization may waive the requirement that the county reimburse the state for any costs incurred by the state in reappraising any class or classes of property if the county presents the state board with a plan to use the money retained to improve the functioning of the office of the county assessor. The reappraisal is the county's valuation for assessment with regard to the reappraised class or classes of property for the year in which the reappraisal is performed.
      2. Whenever a reappraisal is ordered pursuant to subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b), state equalization payments to school districts within the county during the year in which the reappraisal is performed shall be based upon the valuation for assessment as reflected in the county's abstract for assessment for the year prior to the year in which the reappraisal is performed. The state board of equalization shall order the county's board of county commissioners to levy, and the board of county commissioners shall levy, an additional property tax on all taxable property within the county. Such additional property tax shall be levied at the same time as other property taxes are levied during the year in which the reappraisal is performed. Such additional property tax shall be in an amount which is sufficient to reimburse the state for the excess state equalization payments made to school districts within the county during the year in which the reappraisal is performed. The county's board of county commissioners shall reimburse the state for such excess state equalization payments. Such excess shall be that amount of the state equalization payments actually paid by the state to the county during the year in which the reappraisal is performed based on the incorrect valuation for assessment as reflected in the county's abstract for assessment for the immediately prior year which amount exceeds the state equalization payments the state would have paid during the year in which the reappraisal is performed had the valuation for assessment for the immediately prior year been determined by the assessor consistent with the provisions of the Colorado constitution and the statutes. In addition, the additional property tax shall be sufficient to pay to the state, and the board of county commissioners shall pay to the state, interest on such excess at the interest rate determined by the state banking commissioner pursuant to section 39-21-110.5.
      3. If the valuation for assessment of a county as reflected in its abstract for assessment for any property tax year beginning with the property tax year commencing January 1, 1985, is more than five percent below the valuation for assessment for such county as determined by the study conducted during the same property tax year and if the state board of equalization fails to order a reappraisal, state equalization payments to school districts within the county during the year next following the year in which the study was performed shall be based upon the valuation for assessment for the county as reflected in the county's abstract for assessment for the year in which the study was conducted. At the same time as other property taxes are levied during the year in which such state equalization payments are made, the county's board of county commissioners shall levy an additional property tax on all taxable property within the county. Such additional property tax shall be in an amount sufficient to reimburse the state for the difference between the amount the state actually paid in state equalization payments during the year following the year in which the study was performed and what the state would have paid during such year had the state equalization payments been based on the valuation for assessment as determined by the study. The county's board of county commissioners shall reimburse the state for such difference.
      4. Any finding made in 1988 pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b) shall be based primarily on data and information collected from within the county in question, except where data is lacking or deficient. If data from outside the county must be used, then that data must be from a comparable area. If any finding made utilizing the study conducted for the property tax year commencing on January 1, 1987, was based upon data and information comparing taxable property in one county with taxable property in the county subject to such finding, the state board of equalization shall revise such finding so that any orders made pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (b) are based solely on data and information collected from within each affected county.
  1. Any reimbursement made by a county to the state for the cost incurred by the state in reappraising any class or classes of taxable property for property tax purposes pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall be made to the state treasurer who shall credit the amount of the reimbursement to the state general fund. For purposes of this section, the costs of salary and benefits for state employees who work on reappraisals is not a reimbursable cost incurred by the state.

Source: L. 83: Entire section added, p. 1506, § 4, effective June 2. L. 84: (2) added, p. 733, § 2, effective May 11. L. 87: (1)(b)(III) amended, p. 1394, § 1, effective July 1. L. 88: (1)(b)(V) added, p. 1282, § 6, effective January 1, 1989. L. 89: (1)(b)(III) amended, p. 1451, § 4, effective June 7. L. 2004: (1)(a) repealed, p. 205, § 27, effective August 4. L. 2014: (1)(b)(II)(A), (1)(b)(II)(B), and (2) amended, (SB 14-083), ch. 44, p. 216, § 1, effective August 6.

39-1-106. Partial interests not subject to separate tax.

For purposes of property taxation, it shall make no difference that the use, possession, or ownership of any taxable property is qualified, limited, not the subject of alienation, or the subject of levy or distraint separately from the particular tax derivable therefrom. Severed mineral interests shall also be taxed.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 677, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-6. L. 73: p. 1430, § 2. L. 96: Entire section amended, p. 1850, § 2, effective June 5. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 1008, § 2, effective August 7.

ANNOTATION

This section establishes a unity rule for the assessment of property rather than requiring assessment of the various interests in the property. Bd. of Assess. Appeals v. City & County of Denver, 829 P.2d 1319 (Colo. App. 1991), aff'd, 848 P.2d 355 ( Colo. 1993 ).

The unit assessment rule established in this section has no application in the absence of multiple taxpayers with interests in a single property. Rare Air Ltd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2019 COA 134 , 459 P.3d 547.

Taxation of development rights does not violate the unit assessment rule. Because the assignment of the development rights created separate interests in real estate as between the interests of the individual unit owners, on the one hand, and those of the owners of the development rights, on the other hand, separate taxation of those interests does not violate the unit assessment rule. Vill. at Treehouse v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2014 COA 6 , 321 P.3d 624.

Section does not apply to golf club membership that created a license and not an interest in land. Roaring Fork Club v. Pitkin Bd. of Equaliz., 2013 COA 167 , 342 P.3d 467.

39-1-107. Tax liens.

  1. The lien of general taxes for the current year, including taxes levied pursuant to section 39-5-132, shall attach to all taxable property, real and personal, at 12 noon on the assessment date.
  2. Taxes levied on real and personal property, together with any delinquent interest, advertising costs, and fees prescribed by law with respect to any such taxes as may have become delinquent, shall be a perpetual lien thereon, and such lien shall have priority over all other liens until such taxes, delinquent interest, advertising costs, and fees shall have been paid in full.
  3. Repealed.
  4. The property tax on a possessory interest in real or personal property that is exempt from taxation under this article shall be assessed to the holder of the possessory interest and collected in the same manner as property taxes assessed to owners of real or personal property; except that such property tax shall not become a lien against the property. When due, the property tax shall be a debt due from the holder of the possessory interest to the board of county commissioners for the county in which such property is located or to such other body as is authorized by law to levy property taxes, and shall be recoverable by such board or body by direct action in debt on behalf of each governmental entity for which a property tax levy has been made.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 677, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-7. L. 67: p. 212, § 1. L. 75: (1) amended, p. 1462, § 1, effective January 1, 1976. L. 83: (3) repealed, p. 1485, § 11, effective April 22. L. 85: (1) amended, p. 1226, § 3, effective January 1, 1986. L. 89: (1) amended, p. 1482, § 5, effective April 23. L. 92: (2) amended, p. 2222, § 1, effective April 9. L. 2002: (4) added, p. 1008, § 3, effective August 7. L. 2016: (1) amended, (SB 16-189), ch. 210, p. 792, § 105, effective June 6.

Cross references: For receipts for taxes paid, see § 39-10-105; for the effect of issuance of certificate of taxes due, see § 39-10-115; for sale of tax liens, see article 11 of this title.

ANNOTATION

Analysis

I. GENERAL CONSIDERATION.

Law reviews. For article, "Taxation of Estates Pending Probate", see 6 Dicta 15 (April 1929). For article "Federal and State Tax Liens: A Question of Priority", see 12 Colo. Law. 1967 (1983). For article, "An Introduction to Tax Liens", see 13 Colo. Law. 399 (1984). For article, "Survey of Colorado Tax Liens", see 14 Colo. Law. 1765 (1985). For article, "Taxation of Possessory Interests in Exempt Property Under S.B. 02-157", see 32 Colo. Law. 81 (March 2003).

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this section.

Question of tax liens and their priority is for legislative determination. In the absence of legislative action so declaring, taxes are not a lien upon the property. People v. City & County of Denver, 85 Colo. 61, 273 P. 883 (1928).

Revenue statutes are to be construed in favor of the public. Gifford v. Callaway, 8 Colo. App. 359, 46 P. 626 (1896).

Applied in Bd. of Comm'rs v. Denver & S. L. R. R., 88 Colo. 14, 291 P. 1020 (1930), appeal dismissed, 282 U.S. 814, 51 S. Ct. 216, 75 L. Ed. 729, cert. denied, 283 U. S. 826, 51 S. Ct. 348, 75 L. Ed. 1440 (1931).

II. THE TAX LIEN.

Lien effective upon assessment and levy. The tax lien provided does not become effective until the property is assessed and the taxes levied, at which time the theretofore inchoate lien relates back and attaches as of the date authorized for assessment. Wolf v. Antonoff, 161 Colo. 473 , 423 P.2d 840 (1967).

Lien embraces only specific property levied upon. Chicago Bazaar Co. v. McNichols, 13 Colo. App. 154, 56 P. 672 (1899).

A tax lien against real property in one county may not be attached to an improvement upon real property in another county. When a motel which was subject to the plaintiff's tax lien on real property in Garfield County was dismantled and moved to the City and County of Denver, it became personal property which was no longer subject to such lien. Israel v. Rifle Econolodge Joint Venture, 793 P.2d 658 (Colo. App. 1990).

Except as to stocks in merchandise. The lien attaches to an entire stock in merchandise, through all its changes, so long as it remains in the hands of the person taxed. Chicago Bazaar Co. v. McNichols, 13 Colo. App. 154, 56 P. 672 (1899) (decided under former law).

Even stocks in merchandise held by trustee in bankruptcy. Lien covers the stock of merchandise and fixtures which subsequently came into the possession of the taxpayer's trustee in bankruptcy. De Laney v. City & County of Denver, 185 F.2d 246 (10th Cir. 1950) (decided under former law).

Statutory mode of collection must be pursued although tax deemed lien. If a specific mode is provided whereby the land may be sold to satisfy a tax lien, no suit in equity to enforce the sale can be maintained. The specific statutory mode of collection must be pursued. Montezuma Valley Water Supply Co. v. Bell, 20 Colo. 175, 36 P. 1102 (1894).

Lien upon land without regard to title. This section creates a lien upon real estate for the taxes assessed against it: the assessment and all subsequent proceedings down to and including the sale, are against the land without regard to title. Statton v. People ex rel. Burr, 18 Colo. App. 85, 70 P. 157 (1902).

This section and § 39-10-115 to be construed together. This section and § 39-10-115 , concerning certificates of taxes due, should be construed together to mean simply that tax due on real property shall be a perpetual lien upon the real estate until paid or until the treasurer certifies payment. Burton v. City & County of Denver, 99 Colo. 207 , 61 P.2d 856 (1936).

No law limits phrase "perpetual lien", or requires its foreclosure within a specified time on peril of its loss. Bd. of Comm'rs v. Denver & S. L. R. R., 88 Colo. 14, 291 P. 1020 (1930), appeal dismissed, 282 U.S. 814, 51 S. Ct. 216, 75 L. Ed. 729, cert. denied, 283 U.S. 826, 51 S. Ct. 348, 75 L. Ed. 1440 (1931).

Lien on personalty not lost by issuance of tax receipt. Where the personal property in question continues the property of the taxpayer owing the tax and remains in the same jurisdiction, mere issuance of a tax receipt will not oust the lien of taxes, where the county treasurer failed to collect interest on taxes owed. People ex rel. King v. Myers, 16 Colo. App. 371, 65 P. 409 (1901).

Tax assessed for irrigation district is lien upon the land upon which it is levied. Weghorst v. Clark, 66 Colo. 535, 180 P. 742 (1919).

Prospect of future taxes not lien on property. The mere existence of a water and sanitation district and the prospect of taxes in the future was not a lien, encumbrance, or defect on the title to property. Edwards v. St. Paul Title Ins. Co., 39 Colo. App. 235, 563 P.2d 979 (1977).

City acquired an interest in the personal property prior to the date of the chapter 11 bankruptcy since the statute provides that a lien for ad valorem personal property taxes arises at 12 noon on the assessment date for the current year and such lien is a perpetual lien. Although the interest was an inchoate lien, the city was allowed to perfect it after the assessment date and thus have the lien relate back to the assessment date. Therefore the personal property taxes were a prepetition secured claim. In re W. States Distribs., Inc., 179 B.R. 666 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1995).

III. PRIORITY OF TAX LIEN.

Priority of tax liens by express provision. Although the general assembly has the power to declare that tax liens shall be preferred, it must do so by express provision. Otherwise, priority in time will determine. United States v. Elliott, 209 F. Supp. 374 (D. Colo. 1962).

Lien for taxes superior to all other liens. The lien of taxes attaches to the land without regard to title and, consequently, is superior to all other liens. Statton v. People ex rel. Burr, 18 Colo. App. 85, 70 P. 157 (1902).

No lien upon land for personal tax cuts off prior valid lien upon the land. Bd. of Comm'rs v. McDonald, 78 Colo. 519, 242 P. 682 (1926); United States v. Elliott, 209 F. Supp. 374 (D. Colo. 1962).

Priority of debt due United States federal question. Where the United States claims a priority, the priority of a lien for general taxes must be determined under federal law. United States v. Maes, 316 F. Supp. 1267 (D. Colo. 1969).

When county treasurer not indispensable party. The county treasurer who issued certificate of sale to tax sale purchaser is not an indispensable party to a proceeding challenging priority of lien of secured party in property sold at tax sale where he claims no interest in the property since the tax lien has been discharged and where complete relief can be afforded without his presence as a party. John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Moorehead, 38 Colo. App. 220, 556 P.2d 91 (1976), rev'd on other grounds, 194 Colo. 398 , 572 P.2d 1207 (1977).

39-1-108. Payment of taxes - grantor and grantee.

As between the grantor and grantee of property other than property described in section 39-5-104.5, when the instrument of conveyance does not contain an express agreement as to which party shall pay the taxes that may be levied on the property conveyed in the year in which conveyed, if such conveyance is made after the thirty-first day of December and before the first day of July next following, the grantee shall pay such taxes; but if the conveyance is made after the thirtieth day of June and before the first day of January next following, the grantor shall pay such taxes.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 677, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-8. L. 2020: Entire section amended, (HB 20-1077), ch. 80, p. 324, § 6, effective September 14.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under this section as it existed prior to its 1964 repeal and reenactment.

"Taxes" not limited to general property taxes. If it had been the intention of the general assembly to limit application of this section to general property taxes, it is reasonable to believe that the general assembly would have so indicated by apt language. McCord Mercantile Co. v. McIntyre, 25 Colo. App. 376, 138 P. 59 (1914).

Section applies to irrigation district taxes. McCord Mercantile Co. v. McIntyre, 25 Colo. App. 376, 138 P. 59 (1914).

Tax liability even where assessment not yet completed. One conveying lands in September is liable for tax of the same year even though, at the date of the conveyance, the assessment had not been completed nor become a lien on the lands. Rambo v. Armstrong, 45 Colo. 124, 100 P. 586 (1909).

Tax liability for successive conveyances in last half of year. Where, at the end of the year, grantee, who purchased property in the last half of the year, has parted with title to that property and a third party owns it, there can be no recovery by grantee in first deed against his grantor for tax assessed against the property in the absence of allegations and proof that, in the course of the subsequent change in ownership, the grantee in the first deed either has obligated himself to his grantee to pay the taxes or otherwise sustained an equivalent loss. W. Dev. & Realization Corp. v. Hext, 108 Colo. 312 , 117 P.2d 313 (1941).

Grantee in last half of year indemnified by implied contract. Contract implied by this section is to indemnify grantee of a conveyance in the last half of the year against loss for the payment of taxes on property which he owned and of which he had the use for less than half a year. W. Dev. & Realization Corp. v. Hext, 108 Colo. 312 , 117 P.2d 313 (1941).

Section is not applicable where property is taken by condemnation proceedings. Fishel v. City & County of Denver, 106 Colo. 576 , 108 P.2d 236 (1940).

39-1-109. Taxes paid by mortgagee - effect.

If the mortgagor of real property fails or neglects to pay the taxes levied on such property or permits such property to be sold for taxes, the mortgagee may pay said taxes or redeem such property if sold for taxes, and any taxes so paid or redeemed shall become and be a lien upon such real property until the same have been repaid to the mortgagee. Upon payment of any such mortgage or in an action to enforce the same, such mortgagee may demand the taxes so paid or redeemed, with interest thereon at the same rate specified in the mortgage, and the same shall be included in any judgment rendered on the mortgage. The term "mortgage" includes deeds of trust, and the term "mortgagee" includes the beneficiary of a deed of trust.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 678, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-9. L. 73: p. 1417, § 100.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Property Taxation of Oil and Gas Interests", see 24 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 170 (1952).

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under this section as it existed prior to its 1964 repeal and reenactment.

Mortgagee must look to land for reimbursement. Payment of taxes upon mortgaged land affords to the mortgagee no personal action against the mortgagor, in the absence of a covenant to this effect; he must look to the land for reimbursement. Gilmour v. First Nat'l Bank, 21 Colo. App. 301, 121 P. 767 (1912).

Mortgagee entitled to credit for amounts paid for taxes as against mortgagors in an action by mortgagors for an accounting and to redeem. Dubois v. Bowles, 30 Colo. 44, 69 P. 1067 (1902).

Applied in Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Prowers County Oil & Gas Co., 81 Colo. 177, 254 P. 438 (1927).

39-1-110. Notice - formation of political subdivision - boundary change of special district.

    1. When any petition for the organization of a political subdivision is filed, the clerk of any court or board or any other officer with whom the petition has been filed shall immediately, in writing, notify the assessor and the board of county commissioners of each county in which the proposed political subdivision is to be located and the division of local government of the filing, and such notice shall specify the boundaries of the proposed political subdivision. No political subdivision shall levy a tax for the calendar year in which it has been organized unless, prior to July 1 of said year, the assessor and the board of county commissioners of each county within which such political subdivision is located have been notified of its organization and have received from its governing body the following:
      1. Official notice that a tax will be levied for such year;
      2. A legal description; and
      3. A map of the political subdivision.
    2. No levy for the calendar year in which a political subdivision has been organized shall be made by the board of county commissioners or certified to the assessor unless the political subdivision has complied with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (1).

    (1.5) No political subdivision that is a special district shall levy a tax against property included in the special district for the calendar year during which such property was included unless, prior to May 1 of said year or, if such property is included in the special district pursuant to section 32-1-401 (2), C.R.S., prior to July 1 of said year, the court order of inclusion has been filed with the county clerk and recorder of the county in which the inclusion took place in accordance with the provisions of section 32-1-105, C.R.S.

    (1.8) A political subdivision that is a special district shall not levy a tax against property excluded from the special district for the calendar year during which such exclusion becomes effective if, prior to May 1 of said year, the court order of exclusion has been filed with the county clerk and recorder of the county in which the exclusion took place in accordance with the provisions of section 32-1-105, C.R.S.

  1. Whenever all or any portion of a political subdivision becomes part of another county by reason of any change in county boundaries, the governing body of such political subdivision shall, within thirty days after the effective date of such change, notify, in writing, the assessor and the board of county commissioners of the county, of which all or any portion of such political subdivision has become a part, of its intention to levy a tax for the year in which such change became effective.
  2. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any school district, local college district, health service district created pursuant to section 32-1-1003, C.R.S., or health assurance district created pursuant to section 32-1-1003.5, C.R.S.
  3. For purposes of this section, "special district" means a special district formed in accordance with the provisions of title 32, C.R.S.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 678, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-10. L. 67: p. 946, § 6. L. 70: p. 380, § 11. L. 72: p. 620, § 162. L. 73: p. 1432, § 1. L. 85: (1) amended, p. 1022, § 10, effective July 1. L. 87: (1.5) and (1.8) added, p. 1396, § 1, effective April 22. L. 90: (1) amended, p. 1436, § 8, effective January 1, 1991. L. 2003: (1), (1.5), (1.8), and (2) amended and (4) added, p. 746, § 1, effective March 25. L. 2007: (3) amended, p. 1201, § 19, effective July 1.

Cross references: For required notice for organization, dissolution, or boundary change of a special district, see § 32-1-105.

39-1-111. Taxes levied by board of county commissioners.

  1. No later than December 22 in each year, the board of county commissioners in each county of the state, or such other body in the city and county of Denver as shall be authorized by law to levy taxes, or the city council of the city and county of Broomfield, shall, either by an order to be entered in the record of its proceedings or by written approval, levy against the valuation for assessment of all taxable property located in the county on the assessment date, and in the various towns, cities, school districts, and special districts within such county, the requisite property taxes for all purposes required by law.
  2. As soon as such levies have been made, the board of county commissioners, or other body authorized by law to levy taxes, or either group's authorized party shall forthwith certify all such levies to the assessor, upon forms prescribed by the administrator, and shall transmit a copy of such certification to the administrator, to the division of local government, and to the department of education.
  3. If the board of county commissioners, or other body authorized by law to levy taxes, or either group's authorized party fails to certify such levies to the assessor, it is the duty of the assessor, upon direction of the division of local government, to extend the levies of the previous year, subject to the limitations prescribed in section 29-1-301.
  4. If the valuation for assessment for all or any part of any body authorized to levy taxes has been divided for an urban renewal area, pursuant to section 31-25-107 (9)(a), C.R.S., the board of county commissioners shall make the same levy on the portion of valuation for assessment divided under subparagraph (II) as under subparagraph (I) of said section 31-25-107 (9)(a), C.R.S., for payment of taxes according to the provisions of said section, so long as said division remains in effect.
  5. If, after certification of the valuation for assessment pursuant to section 39-5-128 and notification of total actual value pursuant to section 39-5-121 (2)(b) but prior to December 10, changes in such valuation for assessment or total actual value are made by the assessor, the assessor shall send a single notification to the board of county commissioners or other body authorized by law to levy property taxes, to the division of local government, and to the department of education that includes all of such changes that have occurred during said specified period of time. Upon receipt of such notification, such board or body shall make adjustments in the tax levies to ensure compliance with section 29-1-301, C.R.S., if applicable, and may make adjustments in order that the same amount of revenue be raised. A copy of any adjustment to tax levies shall be transmitted to the administrator and assessor. Nothing in this subsection (5) shall be construed as conferring the authority to exceed statutorily imposed mill levy or revenue-raising limits.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 679, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-11. L. 69: p. 1115, § 1. L. 70: p. 380, § 12. L. 72: p. 620, § 163. L. 73: p. 1433, § 2. L. 75: (1) amended, p. 1456, § 1, effective July 14; (4) added, p. 1278, § 5, effective July 16. L. 76: (1) amended, p. 686, § 3, effective July 1. L. 81: (5) added, p. 1397, § 7, effective June 19. L. 84: (5) amended, p. 991, § 1, effective March 26. L. 87: (1) and (5) amended, p. 1410, § 13, effective April 22. L. 88: (1) amended, p. 823, § 36, effective May 24; (1) amended, p. 1283, § 8, effective January 1, 1989. L. 89: (1) and (5) amended, p. 1452, § 5, effective June 7. L. 93: (2) and (5) amended, p. 1282, § 3, effective June 6. L. 96: (5) amended, p. 719, § 2, effective May 22. L. 2001: (1) amended, p. 268, § 15, effective November 15. L. 2021: (1), (2), and (3) amended, (HB 21-1267), ch. 257, p. 1513, § 2, effective September 7.

Editor's note: Amendments to subsection (1) by House Bill 88-1341 and Senate Bill 88-184 were harmonized.

Cross references: For certification by boards of education of amounts that may be levied by boards of county commissioners for school districts, see § 22-40-102; for the procedure for levy and collection of taxes in a special district and the duty of county officers to levy and collect the taxes, see §§ 32-1-1201 and 32-1-1202.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "A Calendar of Tax Procedure in Colorado", see 6 Dicta 17 (July 1929).

Action of board of county commissioners under subsection (1) is purely ministerial. Bolt v. Arapahoe County Sch. Dist. No. 6, 898 P.2d 525 (Colo. 1995).

Applied in City & County of Denver v. Bd. of Dirs., 37 Colo. App. 496, 549 P.2d 1090 (1976).

39-1-111.5. Temporary property tax credits and temporary mill levy rate reductions.

  1. In order to effect a refund for any of the purposes set forth in section 20 of article X of the state constitution, any local government may approve and certify a temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction as set forth in this section. The procedures set forth in this section shall be deemed to be a reasonable method for effecting refunds in accordance with section 20 of article X of the state constitution.
  2. Concurrent with the certification of its levy to the board of county commissioners as required pursuant to section 39-5-128 (1), any local government may certify a refund in the form of a temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction. The certification shall include the local government's gross mill levy, the temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction expressed in mill levy equivalents, and the net mill levy, which shall be the gross mill levy less the temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction.
  3. Concurrent with certification to the assessor of all mill levies by the board of county commissioners or other body authorized by law to levy taxes, or by either group's authorized party, in accordance with section 39-1-111 (2), the board of county commissioners shall certify any other local government's temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction and any temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction for the county or city and county itself, itemized as set forth in subsection (2) of this section.
  4. Concurrent with the delivery to the treasurer of the tax warrant by the assessor in accordance with section 39-5-129, the assessor shall, in addition to all other information required to be set forth in the tax warrant, itemize in the manner set forth in subsection (2) of this section any duly certified temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction.
  5. Upon receipt of any tax warrant reflecting a temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction for any local government, the treasurer shall be responsible for collecting taxes on behalf of such local government based upon such local government's net adjusted mill levy. In addition to any other information required by section 39-10-103, the tax statement shall indicate by footnote which, if any, local government mill levies contained therein reflect a temporary property tax credit or temporary mill levy rate reduction for the purpose of effecting a refund in accordance with section 20 of article X of the state constitution.

Source: L. 93: Entire section added, p. 1686, § 1, effective June 6. L. 2021: (3) amended, (HB 21-1267), ch. 257, p. 1514, § 3, effective September 7.

39-1-112. Taxes available - when.

Except as otherwise provided in article 1.5 of this title, all taxes levied pursuant to the provisions of articles 1 to 13 of this title shall be available for expenditure by the political subdivision for which levied during its fiscal year as collected.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 679, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-12. L. 81: Entire section amended, p. 1841, § 2, effective May 28.

39-1-113. Abatement and refund of taxes.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (1.5) of this section, no decision on any petition regarding abatement or refund of taxes, as provided for in section 39-10-114, shall be made by the board of county commissioners unless a hearing is had thereon, at which hearing the assessor and the taxpayer shall have the opportunity to be present. The board may appoint independent referees who are experienced in property valuation to conduct the hearing on behalf of the board, to make findings, and to submit recommendations to the board for its final decision.

    (1.5) Upon authorization by the board of county commissioners, the assessor may review petitions for abatement or refund and settle by written mutual agreement any such petition for abatement or refund in an amount of ten thousand dollars or less per tract, parcel, or lot of land or per schedule of personal property. Any abatement or refund agreed upon and settled pursuant to this subsection (1.5) shall not be subject to the requirements of subsection (1) of this section.

    (1.7) Every petition for abatement or refund filed pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within six months of the date of filing such petition.

    1. Whenever any abatement or refund in an amount of ten thousand dollars or less is recommended by the board of county commissioners, the board shall order the abatement of taxes pro rata for all levies applicable to such property, or, in the case of a refund, the board shall order the refund of taxes pro rata by all jurisdictions receiving payment thereof.
    2. Whenever any abatement or refund in an amount of ten thousand dollars or less has been agreed upon and settled by the assessor pursuant to subsection (1.5) of this section, the assessor shall order the abatement of taxes pro rata for all levies applicable to such property, or, in the case of a refund, the assessor shall order the refund of taxes pro rata by all jurisdictions receiving payment thereof.
  2. Whenever any abatement or refund in an amount in excess of ten thousand dollars is recommended by the board of county commissioners, two copies of an application therefor, reciting the amount of such abatement or refund and the grounds upon which it should be allowed, shall be submitted to the administrator for review pursuant to section 39-2-116. If an application is approved, the board of county commissioners shall order the abatement of taxes pro rata for all levies applicable to such property, or, in the case of a refund, the board of county commissioners shall order the refund of taxes pro rata by all jurisdictions receiving payment thereof.
  3. (Deleted by amendment, L. 91, p. 1962 , § 2, effective June 5, 1991.)
    1. If a hearing is required pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, the board of county commissioners shall provide at least seven days' notice of the scheduled hearing on a petition for abatement and refund of taxes to the person signing such petition and the taxpayer if the taxpayer did not sign the petition. Except as authorized in paragraph (b) of this subsection (5), notice shall be provided by sending to such person through the United States mail notification of the date, time, and place of the hearing.
    2. A board of county commissioners may authorize by resolution a person required to be notified by paragraph (a) of this subsection (5) or such person's agent to elect to receive the notice by fax or electronic mail at a phone number or electronic mail address supplied by such person. If no election is made by such person, the board of county commissioners shall mail the required notice.
  4. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, for taxes levied on and after January 1, 1990, a taxpayer may file a petition for abatement or refund of taxes levied on property if the valuation of such property was the subject of an arbitration hearing pursuant to section 39-8-108.5 and the arbitrator presiding over such hearing failed to deliver a decision to the taxpayer prior to the beginning date of the period during which the assessor sits to hear all objections and protests concerning the valuation of such property in the year following the year in which such arbitration hearing was held.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 679, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-13. L. 70: p. 381, § 13. L. 77: Entire section amended, p. 1733, § 6, effective June 20. L. 81: Entire section amended, p. 1837, § 1, effective January 1, 1982. L. 87: Entire section amended, p. 1397, § 1, effective May 6. L. 88: (1) to (3) amended, pp. 1290, 1294, §§ 23, 27, effective May 23. L. 90: (2) and (3) amended, p. 1703, § 38, effective June 9. L. 91: (1) and (4) amended and (5) and (6) added, p. 1962, § 2, effective June 5. L. 92: (1), (2), (5), and (6) amended and (1.5) and (1.7) added, p. 2205, § 1, effective June 3. L. 93: (1) amended, p. 1744, § 3, effective July 1. L. 96: (3) amended, p. 649, § 1, effective May 1. L. 2003: (1) amended, p. 1347, § 1, effective August 6. L. 2008: (2) and (3) amended, p. 1246, § 5, effective August 5. L. 2010: (1.5), (2), and (3) amended, (HB 10-1117), ch. 195, p. 841, § 1, effective August 11. L. 2016: (5) amended, (SB 16-172), ch. 280, p. 1148, § 1, effective June 10.

Cross references: For approval of tax abatements or refunds by the property tax administrator, see § 39-2-116; for further restrictions relating to the abatement, refund, and cancellation of taxes, see § 39-10-114.

ANNOTATION

Where this section and § 39-10-114 protect taxpayer's due process rights. Where taxpayer complained that county assessor had failed to give the required timely notice of an increased assessment, thus depriving him of his statutory right to litigate validity of the assessment before paying tax, no federally guaranteed rights were abridged because the abatement and refund procedures of this section and § 39-10-114 allowed plain, adequate, and complete remedy, thus fully protecting the taxpayer's due process rights. Lamm v. Barber, 192 Colo. 511 , 565 P.2d 538 (1977).

Prior to suit, taxpayer must exhaust administrative remedies. The remedies contained in § 39-10-114 , relating to procedures for abatement or cancellation of taxes and this section are complete and adequate; thus, prior to commencing suit on illegal taxation issues, taxpayers are required to exhaust the administrative remedies detailed in these sections. Davison v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 41 Colo. App. 344, 585 P.2d 315 (1978); Southern Cafeteria, Inc. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 677 P.2d 362 (Colo. App. 1983).

By approving taxpayer's petition "conditionally" or otherwise and submitting it to the property tax administrator for further action, the board of county commissioners' procedural rights as a party ended under the statutory scheme governing abatement and refund proceedings. Huerfano County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 976 P.2d 893 (Colo. App. 1999).

When section applies. This section applies to the refund of taxes paid under § 39-8-109 after a taxpayer who sought administrative relief under § 39-5-122 prevailed before the board of assessment appeals or the district court or when property taxes cannot be challenged under § 39-5-122. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Benbrook, 735 P.2d 860 (Colo. 1987).

This section and § 39-10-114 provide a remedy for the abatement or refund of taxes that cannot be challenged under § 39-5-122 . Valley Country Club v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 778 P.2d 285 (Colo. App. 1989), rev'd on other grounds, 792 P.2d 299 ( Colo. 1990 ).

The abatement procedure may be used to provide taxpayer relief from the overassessment of his property in situations where his knowledge of excessive charges is acquired subsequent to the usual statutory deadlines for protest. Valley Country Club v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 778 P.2d 285 (Colo. App. 1989), rev'd on other grounds, 792 P.2d 299 ( Colo. 1990 ).

Board of assessment appeals may conduct de novo review in reviewing taxpayer's appeal from property tax administrator. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Valley Country Club, 792 P.2d 299 (Colo. 1990).

Illegal or erroneous tax. Where one owner of a converted condominium, after pursuing administrative remedies under § 39-5-122, obtained a declaration from district court that the imposition of an increased tax on his converted condominium was illegal, petitioners, as owners of identical condominiums were entitled to seek relief under the abatement and refund provisions of this section and § 39-10-114 because the tax had been declared illegal. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Benbrook, 735 P.2d 860 (Colo. 1987).

There is no need to characterize the tax paid as wholly illegal before the taxpayer may obtain abatement and refund. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Benbrook, 735 P.2d 860 (Colo. 1987).

Refund statute not applicable where property has been assessed improperly because of taxpayer's error in reporting and where taxpayer did not make a timely objection. Coquina Oil v. Larimer Co. Bd. of Equal., 742 P.2d 932 (Colo. App. 1987), aff'd, 770 P.2d 1196 ( Colo. 1989 ); Aurora Plaza v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 770 P.2d 1204 ( Colo. 1989 ); Amoco Prod. v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 770 P.2d 1207 (Colo. 1989).

Where error is due at least in part to the taxing authority, a taxpayer can recover a refund under the clerical error provision of this section, after the time to protest under § 39-5-122 has passed. Coquina Oil Corp. v. Bd. of Equaliz., 770 P.2d 1196 (Colo. 1989).

A nonoperating fractional interest owner who pays taxes is a property owner, person, and taxpayer entitled to the panoply of rights afforded such property owner, person, or taxpayer under the review, audit, protest, abatement, and appeal procedures under the relevant tax statutes. CO2 Comm. v. Montezuma County, 2021 COA 36 , 491 P.3d 516.

Applied in Bd. of County Comm'rs v. District Court, 199 Colo. 338 , 607 P.2d 999 (1980); Laredo Hous. Apts., Ltd. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 628 P.2d 135 (Colo. App. 1980); Laredo Hous. Apts., Ltd. v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 675 P.2d 23 (Colo. App. 1983).

39-1-114. Who may administer oath.

Whenever any fact, matter, or thing is required by the provisions of articles 1 to 13 of this title to be verified by oath or affirmation, any assessor, treasurer, or county clerk and recorder, or a deputy of any of said officers may administer such oath or affirmation. The deputy need not certify the oath in the name of the principal.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 679, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-14.

39-1-115. Records prima facie evidence.

The assessment rolls, the tax warrants, the entries made in the books of the treasurer, and the lists of lands sold for taxes recorded by the treasurer or the county clerk and recorder, or a certified copy thereof, shall be prima facie evidence of all things appearing therein in all courts and places.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 679, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-15.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under this section as it existed prior to its 1964 repeal and reenactment.

Records conclusive unless refuted. Where personalty, shown to have existed during the years in question, but nevertheless omitted from the assessment rolls for those years, is discovered and assessed, the owner who contends that the property was properly omitted from the assessment rolls has the burden of proving his contention, failing in which, the record evidence showing assessment must be taken as conclusive. McGuire v. Schwartz, 101 Colo. 310 , 73 P.2d 389 (1937).

Limitation on presumption created by section. Where personalty discovered in decedent's possession at the time of her death had not been reported in the personal property returns of decedent in the year of her death or the preceding years, the presumption created by this section will not support a presumption, advanced by the manager of revenue, in a suit for personal property taxes, that decedent made false returns concerning personalty which she, in fact, owned, nor does it shift the burden of proof to the defendant executor of decedent's estate. Brodhead v. Robinson, 127 Colo. 116 , 254 P.2d 857 (1953).

This section does not apply to copies of tax schedules. Bankers Trust Co. v. Int'l Trust Co., 108 Colo. 15 , 113 P.2d 656 (1941).

39-1-116. Penalty for divulging confidential information.

[ Editor's note: This version of this section is effective until March 1, 2022. ] Except when pursuant to an order of any court of competent jurisdiction or as otherwise provided by law, any person who divulges or makes known in any way the contents of any private document, as specified in section 39-4-103, 39-5-120, or 39-7-101 (4), to any person not authorized to have access to such documents is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than three months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

39-1-116. Penalty for divulging confidential information.

[ Editor's note: This version of this section is effective March 1, 2022. ] Except when pursuant to an order of any court of competent jurisdiction or as otherwise provided by law, any person who divulges or makes known in any way the contents of any private document, as specified in section 39-4-103, 39-5-120, or 39-7-101 (4), to any person not authorized to have access to such documents commits a petty offense.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 680, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-16. L. 96: Entire section amended, p. 110, § 2, effective January 1, 1997. L. 2021: Entire section amended, (SB 21-271), ch. 462, p. 3294, § 688, effective March 1, 2022.

Editor's note: Section 803(2) of chapter 462 (SB 21-271), Session Laws of Colorado 2021, provides that the act changing this section applies to offenses committed on or after March 1, 2022.

Cross references: For confidential records submitted by a public utility, see § 39-4-103; for confidential personal property schedules, see § 39-5-120.

39-1-117. Prior actions not affected.

Nothing in articles 1 to 13 of this title shall apply to or in any manner affect any valuation, assessment, allocation, levy, tax certificate, tax warrant, tax sale, tax deed, right, claim, demand, lien, indictment, information, warrant, prosecution, defense, trial, cause of action, motion, appeal, judgment, sentence, or other authorized act, done or to be done, or proceeding arising under or pursuant to the laws in effect immediately prior to August 1, 1964, but the same shall be governed by and conducted pursuant to the provisions of law in effect immediately prior to August 1, 1964.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 748, § 2. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-18.

39-1-118. Repeal of law levying state property tax - disposition of funds.

After the repeal of any law levying a general property tax for the state or for state purposes takes effect, delinquent taxes collected by county treasurers as a result of the levy imposed by any such repealed law shall, when received by the state treasurer, be credited to the capital construction fund.

Source: L. 71: p. 1243, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-21.

Cross references: For the creation of and provisions relating to the capital construction fund, see § 24-75-302.

39-1-119. Funds held for payment of taxes - refund - reduction and increase of amounts - penalty.

  1. Subject to section 39-3.5-105 (2), all funds in excess of those permitted to be held by the federal "Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974", 12 U.S.C. sec. 2601 et seq., as amended from time to time, and any rules promulgated to implement that federal law, as amended from time to time, held in escrow for the payment of ad valorem taxes on property under any deed of trust, mortgage, or other agreement encumbering or pertaining to real property located in this state shall be refunded to the property owner at the time and in the manner required by the federal law and rules. This subsection (1) applies whether or not the federal law and rules would apply to the deed of trust, mortgage, or other agreement in the absence of this subsection (1).
  2. Payments into such escrow accounts for the payment of ad valorem taxes due in subsequent years shall be adjusted annually, based upon the amount of taxes paid on the subject property for the preceding year, but if such person reasonably believes that substantial improvements have been made to such property, which improvements were not included within the previous year's assessment, a reasonable estimate of the taxes for such subsequent years may be used as a basis for establishing the payments for such escrow account.

    (2.5) The amount of payments into such escrow accounts for the payment of ad valorem taxes due in subsequent years shall be increased only upon official notification of an increase in the amount of taxes levied on such property. Such amounts shall not be increased based solely upon notification of an increase in the valuation for assessment of such property.

  3. Any person willfully failing to make a refund in violation of subsection (1) of this section for any whole month or more shall be liable for interest at a rate of six percent per annum and an equal amount as penalty.

Source: L. 73: p. 1435, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-1-22. L. 74: (1) amended, p. 427, § 1, effective March 19. L. 79: (1) amended, p. 1414, § 10, effective January 1, 1980. L. 80: (1) amended, p. 797, § 62, effective June 5. L. 87: (2.5) added, p. 1389, § 11, effective June 20. L. 93: (1) amended, p. 346 § 2, effective April 12. L. 98: (1) amended, p. 828, § 51, effective August 5. L. 2015: (1) amended, (SB 15-142), ch. 29, p. 71, § 1, effective March 18.

39-1-119.5. Funds collected by lessors of personal property for payments of taxes - refund - damages.

  1. If a personal property lessee is required to make payment to a lessor pursuant to the terms of any contract or other agreement entered into between the lessee and lessor for the payment of personal property tax due on or after January 1, 2007, those payments shall be accounted for upon the termination of the lease entered into between the lessee and lessor. If it is determined upon this accounting that a refund is due to the lessee for overpayment of personal property taxes, the lessor shall make such refund to the lessee on or before August 31 of the year in which the tax is due.
  2. The lessor shall base the accounting and refund on the actual property tax liability due in each year of the lease period.
  3. Any lessor who willfully fails to make a refund in violation of subsection (1) of this section shall be liable to the lessee, in a civil action, in an amount equal to the sum of three times the amount of actual damages sustained and in the case of any successful action to enforce said liability, the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.
  4. Any action brought under this section shall be commenced within three years after the date on which the failure to refund occurred or within three years after the lessee discovered or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered the lessor's failure to refund. The period of limitation provided in this section may be extended for a period of one year if the lessee proves that failure to timely commence the action was caused by the lessor engaging in conduct calculated to induce the lessee to refrain from or postpone the commencement of the action.

Source: L. 2006: Entire section added, p. 311, § 1, effective April 4.

39-1-120. Filing - when deemed to have been made.

    1. Any report, schedule, claim, tax return, statement, or other document required or authorized under articles 1 to 9 of this title to be filed with or any payment made to the state of Colorado or any political subdivision thereof which is transmitted through the United States mail shall be deemed filed with and received by the public officer or agency to which it was addressed on the date shown by the cancellation mark stamped on the envelope or other wrapper containing the document required to be filed.
    2. Any such document which is mailed, but not received by the public officer or agency to which it was addressed, or is received and the cancellation mark is not legible, or is erroneous or omitted, shall be deemed to have been filed and received on the date it was mailed if the sender establishes by competent evidence that the document was deposited in the United States mail on or before the date due for filing. In such cases of nonreceipt of a document by the public officer or agency to which it was addressed, the sender shall file a duplicate copy thereof within thirty days after written notification is given to the sender by such public officer of the failure to receive such document.
  1. If any report, schedule, claim, tax return, statement, remittance, or other document is sent by United States registered mail, certified mail, or certificate of mailing, a record authenticated by the United States postal service of such registration, certification, or certificate shall be considered competent evidence that the report, schedule, claim, tax return, statement, remittance, or other document was mailed to the public officer or agency to which it was addressed, and the date of the registration, certification, or certificate shall be deemed to be the postmark date.
  2. If the date for filing any report, schedule, claim, tax return, statement, remittance, or other document falls upon a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, it shall be deemed to have been timely filed if filed on the next business day.

Source: L. 77: Entire section added, p. 1404, § 2, effective July 1. L. 79: (1)(a) amended, p. 1420, § 1, effective January 1, 1980.

ANNOTATION

Under the provisions of subsection (1)(a), abatement and refund petitions transmitted by mail are deemed "filed" on the date of mailing for the purposes of the filing deadline set forth in § 39-10-114 (1)(a)(I)(A). Leprino v. Huddleston, 902 P.2d 962 (Colo. App. 1995).

39-1-121. Expression of rate of property taxation in dollars per thousand dollars of valuation for assessment - definitions.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Communication" means any tax statement pursuant to section 39-10-103.
    2. "Mill" means the rate of property taxation equivalent to the amount of dollars per one thousand dollars of valuation for assessment of taxable real or personal property.
    3. "Valuation for assessment" means the actual value of any real or personal property multiplied by the assessment percentages specified in law.
  2. The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that communications to taxpayers regarding the imposition of property taxes expressed in mills can be unduly confusing to the general public. The general assembly further finds, determines, and declares that, for the convenience of taxpayers and to assist citizens in better understanding the property taxation system, it is advantageous for governmental entities levying property taxes to inform taxpayers of such tax rates in terms of the amount of dollars per one thousand dollars of valuation for assessment of taxable real or personal property.
  3. In any communication to a taxpayer, any mill levy amounts stated shall be converted into the amount of dollars per one thousand dollars of valuation for assessment of taxable real or personal property.

Source: L. 88: Entire section added, p. 1273, § 7, effective July 1. L. 92: (1)(a) amended, p. 2181, § 52, effective June 2. L. 94: (1)(a) amended, p. 1197, § 103, effective July 1. L. 2020: (1)(c) amended, (SB 20-223), ch. 291, p. 1438, § 4, effective January 1, 2021.

Editor's note: Section 5(2) of chapter 291 (SB 20-223), Session Laws of Colorado 2020, provides that changes to this section take effect on the date of the governor's proclamation or January 1, 2021, whichever is later, only if, at the November 2020 statewide election, a majority of voters approve the ballot issue referred in accordance with section 2 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 20-001. The ballot issue, referred to voters as amendment B, was approved on November 3, 2020, and was proclaimed by the Governor on December 31, 2020. The vote count for the measure was as follows:

FOR: : 1,740,395

AGAINST: : 1,285,136

39-1-122. Interim task force to study property tax assessment - classification - land used for agricultural and other purposes - 2010 interim - legislative declaration - repeal. (Repealed)

Source: L. 2010: Entire section added, (HB 10-1293), ch. 357, p. 1699, § 1, effective June 7.

Editor's note: Subsection (7) provided for the repeal of this section, effective July 1, 2012. (See L. 2010, p. 1699 .)

39-1-123. Property tax reimbursement - property destroyed by natural cause.

  1. Eligibility. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2013, real or business personal property listed on a single schedule that was destroyed by a natural cause as defined in section 39-1-102 (8.4), as determined by the county assessor in the county in which the property is located, shall be subject to a reimbursement from the state in an amount equal to the property tax liability applicable to the destroyed property in the property tax year in which the natural cause occurred.
  2. Report of destroyed properties.
      1. For the property tax year commencing January 1, 2013, on or before July 1, 2014, or on or before October 1, 2014, for public utilities identified in article 4 of this title, the assessor of each county with property destroyed by a natural cause during the year shall forward to the applicable county treasurer a report of the taxable real or business personal property in the county that was destroyed by a natural cause. The report must include the information specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (2).
      2. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2014, on or before December 15 of the applicable property tax year, the assessor of each county with property destroyed by a natural cause shall forward to the applicable county treasurer a report of the taxable real or business personal property in the county that was destroyed by a natural cause through November of the year. The report must include the information specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (2).
      3. If after submitting a report to the county treasurer pursuant to subparagraph (I) or (II) of this paragraph (a), the county assessor discovers any taxable real or business personal property that was destroyed by a natural cause during the applicable property tax year that was not included in the report, the county assessor shall forward to the county treasurer a supplemental report of the additional taxable real or business personal property in the county that was destroyed by a natural cause. The report must include the information specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (2). If applicable, the county assessor shall forward the supplemental report to the county treasurer on or before July 1, or for public utilities identified in article 4 of this title, on or before October 1 of the year following the property tax year in which the property was destroyed by a natural cause.
      1. In the case of taxable real property, the reports required pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) shall include the following:
        1. The legal description of each parcel of real property in the county containing the real property destroyed by a natural cause in the applicable property tax year;
        2. The schedule or parcel number for each parcel of real property containing the real property destroyed by a natural cause in the applicable property tax year;
        3. The name of the real property owner on record;
        4. A description of the real property and the date of the destruction; and
        5. The prorated property taxes due on the destroyed real property for the applicable property tax year according to the records of the county assessor.
      2. In the case of taxable business personal property, the reports required pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) shall include the following:
        1. The schedule or identifying number for the business personal property destroyed by a natural cause;
        2. The name of the taxpayer who owns or leases the business personal property that was destroyed by a natural cause and the name of the entity under which the taxpayer does business, if applicable; and
        3. The property taxes due on the destroyed business personal property for the applicable property tax year according to the records of the county assessor.
  3. Verification of property taxes owed.
    1. Within thirty calendar days of receiving a report from the county assessor pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the county treasurer of the same county shall verify the total amount of the property tax in the county that is eligible for reimbursement pursuant to subsection (1) of this section. The county treasurer shall calculate such amount based on the certified tax roll that the county treasurer receives from the county assessor, as adjusted by any proration of the amount of property taxes owed due to the destruction of the property.
    2. As soon as practicable after verifying the total amount of property tax in the county that is eligible to be reimbursed, the county treasurer shall transmit a report to the state treasurer that includes the county treasurer's verification and the report of the destroyed properties from the county assessor.
  4. State treasurer to pay county treasurer. After receiving a report from a county treasurer pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, and subject to appropriation, the state treasurer shall issue a reimbursement warrant to the applicable county treasurer in an amount equal to the total amount of property tax due in the county that is eligible to be reimbursed pursuant to subsection (1) of this section for the applicable property tax year. The reimbursement shall be paid from the state general fund.
  5. Reimbursement.
    1. Within thirty calendar days of the receipt of moneys from the state treasurer pursuant to subsection (4) of this section, the county treasurer shall:
      1. Apply a credit to the tax bill of the destroyed property for that year in the amount of the expected reimbursement and apply the reimbursement received from the treasurer to such credit; or
      2. Pay the property tax owed for each destroyed property. If the property tax due for the destroyed property has already been paid, the county treasurer shall issue a reimbursement to the taxpayer's last recorded mailing address.
    2. The county treasurer shall waive any interest on unpaid property taxes that are paid pursuant to this subsection (5).
    3. If any reimbursements are returned to the county treasurer as undeliverable, the county treasurer shall hold the reimbursement for six months from the date that the reimbursement was returned to the county treasurer, and the taxpayer may claim the reimbursement from the county treasurer. The county treasurer shall return to the state treasurer any reimbursements that have not been claimed by the taxpayer within such time.
    4. The state treasurer shall transfer to the general fund any moneys that he or she receives from a county treasurer pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subsection (5).
    5. Nothing in this subsection (5) shall be construed to require a county treasurer to credit or pay the property tax bill of any destroyed property prior to the county treasurer's receipt of a reimbursement warrant from the state treasurer pursuant to subsection (4) of this section.
  6. Review. During the first regular session of the seventy-first general assembly, the finance committees of the house of representatives and the senate, or any successor committees, shall review the provisions of this section and make recommendations regarding whether the provisions should be continued, repealed, or continued with modifications.

Source: L. 2014: Entire section added, (HB 14-1001), ch. 222, p. 830, § 1, effective May 17.

39-1-124. Mailing required to be sent by county assessor or treasurer - reasonable certainty mailing will not be delivered.

If a county assessor or treasurer has reasonable certainty that a mailing or notice required to be sent pursuant to this title 39 will not be delivered to a residential real property address by the United States postal service, the county assessor or treasurer is not required to send the mailing or notice to that residential real property address; except that this section does not apply to notices required to be sent pursuant to sections 39-11-128 and 39-10-111.5 (6)(b).

Source: L. 2020: Entire section added, (HB 20-1077), ch. 80, p. 325, § 7, effective September 14.

ARTICLE 1.5 PREPAYMENT OF AD VALOREM TAXES

Section

39-1.5-101. Legislative declaration.

The general assembly hereby finds and declares that energy development operations and mineral extraction or conversion operations should be authorized to prepay ad valorem taxes to local governments for expenditure on capital improvements in order to meet additional public service demands created by such operations.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1839, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-102. Definitions.

As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Capital improvement" means any road or highway, school facility or equipment, domestic, commercial, or industrial water facility, sewage facility, police and fire protection facility or equipment, hospital facility or equipment, or any other local government administrative or judicial facility which a local government is authorized by law to acquire or construct.
  2. "Local government" means a county, municipality as defined in section 31-1-101, C.R.S., school district, or special district which has the authority to impose general property taxes.
  3. "Operation" means the development, construction, and operation of any facility for the production of energy or the extraction, processing, conversion, or refining of minerals, including, but not limited to, a mine, power plant, mill, retort, or related facility, or any combination thereof under the same ownership, if the valuation for assessment of the taxable property of the operation within the boundaries of a local government is estimated to exceed fifty million dollars when the operation begins functioning.

Source: L. 81: Entire article, p. 1839, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-103. Authorization of prepayment of taxes for capital improvements to local governments - no effect on obligation to pay taxes to other local governments.

  1. An owner of an operation may prepay moneys to one or more local governments, within the boundaries of which is located taxable property of the operation, for credit against general property taxes which will be levied in the future pursuant to articles 1 to 13 of this title. Said moneys shall be expended on capital improvements which are directly or indirectly related to the additional public service demands created by the operation.
  2. If an operation prepays moneys for credit against general property taxes pursuant to this article to one or more local governments, said prepayment shall not vary the operation's obligations, under law, to pay general property taxes to any local government which does not receive such prepayments.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1840, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-104. Prepayment - amounts - credits - limitations.

  1. An owner of an operation who elects to make prepayments under this article and the governing body of a local government shall jointly determine and agree upon:
    1. The total amount of prepayments to be made; except that the total amount of prepayments shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the estimate of the operation's projected tax liability to the local government over a twenty-year period, commencing with the taxable year in which the valuation for assessment of the operation is estimated to exceed fifty million dollars;
    2. The amounts and intervals of prepayments and credits for such prepayments; except that an annual prepayment credit shall not be allowed prior to the taxable year in which the operation begins functioning or the valuation for assessment of the operation exceeds fifty million dollars, whichever is earlier, nor shall it exceed twenty-five percent of the taxes due from the operation to that local government for the then current property tax year.
  2. The owner of an operation, the governing body of the local government, the assessor, the treasurer, and the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs shall estimate when the operation's projected valuation for assessment will exceed fifty million dollars and the amount thereof for the ensuing twenty years, as well as the operation's projected liability for general property taxes for the applicable period.
  3. The governing body of the local government shall adopt a resolution or ordinance which contains the total amount of taxes to be prepaid, the anticipated amounts and anticipated intervals of prepayments and credits for such prepayments, and the capital improvement or improvements upon which such prepaid taxes will be expended.
  4. The credit allowed in any taxable year for prepayments made under this article to or for each local government or any fund or account within the fund thereof shall be treated as an abatement of the property taxes due to such local government for that year from said operation and shall not affect the determination of the valuation for assessment thereof. The credit shall be shown on the tax statement for that year as it applies to each local government, fund, or fund account to which applied.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1840, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-105. Prepaid taxes subject to laws governing financial affairs.

Moneys received pursuant to this article are subject to such laws relating to financial affairs, including budget, accounting, and auditing laws, as are or may be made applicable to the local government which receives such moneys.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1841, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-106. Relationship between prepaid taxes and the limitation on local government levies.

In determining the amount of revenue which a local government is allowed to levy under section 29-1-301, C.R.S., prepayments made under this article shall not be deemed property tax revenue in the year of prepayment; however, tax liability against which a credit is to be allowed shall be deemed property tax revenue attributable to increased valuation for new construction or bond revenue in accordance with section 29-1-302, C.R.S., in the year in which a credit is to be allowed.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1841, § 1, effective May 28.

39-1.5-107. Prepayment arrangement not a general obligation indebtedness.

Any arrangement for prepayment of ad valorem taxes under this article shall not be construed to be a general obligation indebtedness.

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1841, § 1, effective May 28.

ARTICLE 2 DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION - ADMINISTRATOR - BOARD

Editor's note: This article was repealed and reenacted in 1964 and was subsequently repealed and reenacted in 1970, resulting in the addition, relocation, and elimination of sections as well as subject matter. For amendments to this article prior to 1970, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note beginning on page vii in the front of this volume and the editor's note before the article 1 heading.

Section

39-2-101. Division created - property tax administrator.

There is hereby created the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs, the head of which shall be the property tax administrator, which office is created by section 15 of article X of the state constitution. The administrator shall be appointed by a majority vote of the state board of equalization and shall serve for a term of five years and until a successor is appointed and qualified. The administrator may be removed from office for cause by a majority vote of the state board of equalization. The position of property tax administrator shall be exempt from the state personnel system.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 371, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-1. L. 84: Entire section amended, p. 992, § 1, effective February 17.

Cross references: For the creation of the department of local affairs, see § 24-1-125.

39-2-102. Qualifications.

The person appointed as property tax administrator shall possess knowledge of the subject of property taxation and of the laws of this state relating thereto and shall have demonstrated ability and experience in the field of property taxation. He shall devote his full time to the performance of his duties as administrator and shall hold no other office under the United States, the state, or any political subdivision thereof.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 371, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-2.

ANNOTATION

Fee title owners of subdivision parcels, rather than the homeowners association that manages the subdivision, are subject to real property taxation due to the covenants that permit the association to restrict property access for nonpayment of association assessments. Hinsdale County Bd. of Eq. v. HDH P'ship, 2019 CO 22, 438 P.3d 742.

Record title owners of real property are the true owners of the property and are therefore responsible for property taxes. Hinsdale County Bd. of Eq. v. HDH P'ship, 2019 CO 22, 438 P.3d 742.

39-2-103. Exercise of power.

The division of property taxation and the property tax administrator shall exercise their powers, duties, and functions under the department of local affairs as if they were transferred to said department by a type 1 transfer under the provisions of the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968".

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 371, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-3.

Cross references: For the creation of the department of local affairs, see § 24-1-125; for the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968", see article 1 of title 24.

39-2-104. Oath of office.

Before entering upon the duties of his office, the property tax administrator shall take and subscribe to the constitutional oath of office, which oath or affirmation shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-4.

Cross references: For oath of office required of civil officers, see § 8 of article XII of the state constitution.

39-2-105. Seal.

The division of property taxation shall have an official seal with the words "Property Tax Division - Department of Local Affairs" and such other appropriate design as the property tax administrator may determine engraved thereon, by which he shall authenticate proceedings conducted by him and of which the courts shall take judicial notice.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-5.

39-2-106. Employees - compensation.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 13 of article XII of the state constitution, the property tax administrator may employ a secretary and such other clerical and professional personnel as may be required to perform his duties. Compensation of the property tax administrator and other employees and necessary expenses of the division of property taxation shall be paid from annual appropriations made to the division by the general assembly. Any costs of the property tax administrator in implementing the assessment and levy procedures required pursuant to section 39-5-132 shall be paid by the local taxing authorities pursuant to said section.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-6. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 1226, § 4, effective January 1, 1986.

39-2-107. Office - hearings.

  1. The property tax administrator shall maintain his office in the city of Denver but may transact official business at any other place within the state. The office shall be open during established hours each day, Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays excepted.
  2. Any hearings conducted by the administrator or the division shall be open to the public, and full and correct minutes thereof shall be kept, and such minutes shall be a public record open to public inspection.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-7.

39-2-108. Rules and regulations.

The administrator shall adopt rules and regulations governing proceedings and hearings pursuant to the provisions of article 4 of title 24, C.R.S., which rules and regulations shall be subject to legislative review pursuant to section 24-4-103 (8)(d), C.R.S.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-8. L. 77: Entire section amended, p. 1733, § 8, effective June 20.

39-2-109. Duties, powers, and authority.

  1. It is the duty of the property tax administrator, and the administrator shall have and exercise authority:
    1. To value the property and plant of all public utilities doing business in this state in the manner prescribed by law, which value shall be equalized in accordance with the provisions of section 39-4-102 (3), and to prepare and furnish all forms required to be filed with him by public utilities;
    2. To assist and cooperate in the administration of all laws concerning the valuing of taxable property, the assessment of same, and the levying of property taxes;
    3. Repealed.
    4. To approve the form and size of all personal property schedules, forms, and notices furnished or sent by assessors to owners of taxable property, the form of petitions for abatement or refund, the form of all field books, plat and block books, maps, and appraisal cards used in the office of the assessor and other forms and records used and maintained by the assessor and to require exclusive use of such approved schedules, books, maps, appraisal cards, forms, and records by all assessors to insure uniformity;
    5. To prepare and publish from time to time manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions, after consultation with the advisory committee to the property tax administrator and the approval of the state board of equalization, concerning methods of appraising and valuing land, improvements, personal property, and mobile homes and to require their utilization by assessors in valuing and assessing taxable property. Said manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions shall be based upon the three approaches to appraisal and the procedures set forth in section 39-1-103 (5)(a). Such manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions shall be subject to legislative review, the same as rules and regulations, pursuant to section 24-4-103 (8)(d), C.R.S.
    6. To prepare and furnish to assessors all forms required to be completed by them and filed with the property tax administrator;
    7. To call, upon not less than ten days' prior notice, meetings of assessors at some designated place in the state and, upon reasonable notice, to call group or area meetings of two or more assessors;
    8. To prepare and design a basic form for all assessors to use in the assessment of real property which will set forth in detail information to be inserted pertaining to the approaches to appraisal set forth in section 39-1-103 (5)(a);
    9. To determine, whenever the administrator discovers that any taxable property of a public utility or any taxable rail transportation property has been omitted from the assessment roll of any year or series of years, the value of such omitted property. The administrator shall notify the assessor of such discovery and value. The assessor shall list the same on the assessment roll of the year in which the discovery was made and shall notify the treasurer of any unpaid taxes on such property for prior years.
    10. Repealed.
    11. To prepare and publish guidelines, after consultation with the advisory committee to the property tax administrator and approval of the state board of equalization, concerning the audit and compliance review of oil and gas leasehold properties for property tax purposes, which shall be utilized by assessors, treasurers, and their agents. Such guidelines shall be subject to legislative review, the same as rules and regulations, pursuant to section 24-4-103 (8)(d), C.R.S.
    12. To resolve valuation disputes concerning property or property interests owned or held by the Southern Ute Indian tribe as provided in the taxation compact set forth in section 24-61-102, C.R.S.;
    13. To establish the forms required pursuant to part 2 of article 29 of title 38, C.R.S.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 372, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-9. L. 73: p. 1437, § 1. L. 76: (1)(e) amended, p. 756, § 7, effective July 1. L. 77: (1)(h) added, p. 1750, § 1, effective June 9; (1)(c) R&RE and (1)(e) amended, p. 1733, §§ 7, 9, effective June 20. L. 81: (1)(c) repealed, p. 1398, § 11, effective January 1; (1)(a) amended, p. 1848, § 3, effective January 1, 1982. L. 82: (1)(e) amended, p. 555, § 1, effective January 1, 1984. L. 83: (1)(e) R&RE, p. 1498, § 1, effective April 12; (1)(b) amended, p. 1489, § 2, effective April 21; (1)(h) amended, p. 1483, § 4, effective April 22; (1)(i) and (1)(j) added, pp. 2082, 2083, §§ 1, 1, effective October 13. L. 90: (1)(e) amended, p. 1699, § 26, effective June 9. L. 91: (1)(k) added, p. 1953, § 1, effective January 1, 1992. L. 96: IP(1) and (1)(d) amended, p. 649, § 2, effective May 1; (1)(l) added, p. 1726, § 2, effective June 3. L. 99: (1)(l) amended, p. 629, § 40, effective August 4. L. 2004: (1)(j) repealed, p. 206, § 28, effective August 4. L. 2008: (1)(m) added, p. 452, § 10, effective July 1.

ANNOTATION

State property tax administrator's assessors' reference library manuals are binding on county assessors. Huddleston v. Grand County Bd. of Equaliz., 913 P.2d 15 (Colo. 1996).

39-2-109.5. Computers for property assessment - state assistance. (Repealed)

Source: L. 83: Entire section added, p. 2083, § 2, effective October 13. L. 2004: Entire section repealed, p. 206, § 29, effective August 4.

39-2-110. Annual school for assessors.

To further improvement in appraisal and valuation procedures and methods and understanding and knowledge thereof, the division of property taxation shall conduct annual instruction and discussion sessions in the nature of a school for assessors, their employees, and employees of the division for periods not exceeding fifteen days in length. All costs of conducting such sessions shall be paid by the division, and the necessary travel and subsistence expenses of assessors and their employees while attending such sessions shall be paid by their respective counties. All assessors shall attend this annual school. Each assessor completing this school shall receive a certificate of achievement for his effort.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 373, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-10. L. 75: Entire section amended, p. 1457, § 1, effective June 20.

Cross references: For the definition of "assessor", see § 39-1-102 (2).

39-2-111. Complaints.

The administrator shall examine all complaints filed with him wherein it is alleged that a class or subclass of taxable property in a county has not been appraised or valued as required by law or has been improperly or erroneously valued or that the property tax laws have in any manner been evaded or violated. Complaints shall be in writing and may be filed only by a taxing authority in a county or by any taxpayer. Complaints may be filed only with respect to property located in the county in which the taxing authority levies taxes or in which the taxpayer owns taxable property. If the administrator finds the complaint is justified, he may use his findings as the basis for petitioning the state board of equalization for an order of reappraisal pursuant to section 39-2-114.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 373, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-11. L. 76: Entire section amended, p. 757, § 9, effective January 1, 1977. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1490, § 3, effective April 21.

39-2-112. Assessor to appear - when.

The property tax administrator may require any assessor to appear before him at any meeting to ascertain whether he has complied with the law in appraising and valuing the taxable property located in his county.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 373, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-12.

Cross references: For the valuation for assessment, see § 39-1-104.

39-2-113. Administrator may intervene.

  1. The administrator is authorized to appear as a party in interest in any proceeding before a court or other tribunal in which:
    1. An abatement or refund of property taxes is sought; or
    2. A question bearing on a statewide assessment policy is raised.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 373, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-13. L. 76: Entire section R&RE, p. 757, § 10, effective January 1, 1977.

Cross references: For abatement and refund of taxes, see §§ 39-1-113 and 39-10-114.

39-2-114. Reappraisal - when - procedures.

  1. Whenever the administrator petitions the state board of equalization for its order of reappraisal of any class or subclass of taxable property for the following taxable year, the administrator shall send a copy of such petition to the assessor of the county in which such class or subclass of taxable property is located. The petition of reappraisal shall include the reasons for such reappraisal, and the administrator has the duty to establish to the satisfaction of the state board of equalization the need for such reappraisal. The state board of equalization shall conduct a hearing on such petition, at which hearing the assessors shall attend and shall give such testimony and present such evidence as the state board of equalization may require.
  2. At the hearing on the petition for reappraisal, the affected county assessor shall have the opportunity to appear, to produce testimony and evidence, and to cross-examine witnesses. The decision of the state board of equalization shall be delivered in writing no later than the close of business on November 15.
  3. If such reappraisal is ordered by the state board of equalization, the property tax administrator shall direct the staff of the division of property taxation, working jointly with the assessor of such county, to reappraise such property, and the value so determined shall be the actual value of the taxable property in such county for the next taxable year. The results of the reappraisal shall be filed with the property tax administrator no later than the close of business on the last working day in May of the year in which the reappraised values shall be effective, and a copy thereof shall be filed with the assessor.
  4. The affected assessor, board of county commissioners, town, city, school district, or special district, or any taxpayer resident therein, or any of them, may appeal the reappraised value to the state board of equalization by petition filed with the state board of equalization no later than the tenth day of June next following. Upon appeal, the assessor and any other petitioner shall have the right to appear, produce testimony and evidence, and cross-examine witnesses.
  5. The state board of equalization may affirm, rescind, or modify the reappraised values appealed, and shall enter its written order thereof no later than the first day of July next following.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 373, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-14. L. 77: (1) R&RE, p. 1734, § 10, effective June 20. L. 81: (1) amended, p. 1398, § 10, effective January 1. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1490, § 4, effective April 21. L. 86: (2) amended, p. 1101, § 2, effective March 26. L. 89: (2) amended, p. 1452, § 6, effective June 7.

Cross references: For the duties of the board of assessment appeals, see § 39-2-125; for the determination of actual value, see § 39-1-103.

ANNOTATION

Right to appeal reappraisal limited. This section does not grant an affected assessor or a board of county commissioners the right to appeal the reappraisal of property within his or its county to the courts. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Love, 172 Colo. 121 , 470 P.2d 861 (1970) (decided under former law).

39-2-115. Review of abstracts of assessment - recommendations.

    1. No later than August 25 of each year, each county assessor shall file with the property tax administrator two copies of an abstract of assessment of the county.
    2. Repealed.
  1. Upon receipt of the abstracts of assessment from the assessors of the several counties of the state, the administrator shall examine and review each such abstract. If he finds from the abstract of any county that any or all of the various classes or subclasses of real and personal property located in such county have not been valued for assessment by the use of all manuals, factors, formulas, and other directives required by law, the administrator shall determine the amount of increase or decrease in valuation for assessment of such class or subclass necessary to conform to such requirements and shall file a complaint with the state board of equalization specifying the amount recommended to be added to or deducted from the valuation for assessment of such class or subclass of property in such county for the following taxable year.
  2. No later than October 15 of each year, the property tax administrator shall transmit the abstracts of assessment of the several counties to the state board of equalization together with his recommendations.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 374, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-15. L. 77: (2) R&RE, p. 1734, § 11, effective June 20. L. 83: (2) and (3) amended, p. 1491, § 5, effective April 21. L. 86: (3) amended, p. 1102, § 3, effective March 26. L. 89: (1) and (3) amended, p. 1453, § 7, effective June 7. L. 93: (1) amended, p. 1283, § 4, effective June 6. L. 94: (1)(b) amended, p. 1645, § 79, effective July 1. L. 96: (1)(b) repealed, p. 1199, § 3, effective June 1.

ANNOTATION

Failure to provide hearing and review not deprivation of property. The failure to provide a hearing and a review of recommendations for increases or decreases in valuations for assessment of real or personal property does not constitute a deprivation of property without due process of law. People ex rel. State Bd. of Equalization v. Hively, 139 Colo. 49 , 336 P.2d 721 (1959) (decided under former law).

39-2-116. Approval of tax abatement or refund.

The administrator shall review each application submitted by the board of county commissioners or the board of equalization of any county for abatement or refund of taxes, and, if all of such application is found to be in proper form and recommended in conformity with the law, the application shall be approved; otherwise, it shall be disapproved, in which case the disapproval may be appealed to the board pursuant to section 39-2-125 (1)(b). If only a portion of such application is found to be in proper form and recommended in conformity with the law, the administrator shall approve such part and disapprove the remainder of the application, in which case the disapproved portion may be appealed to the board pursuant to section 39-2-125 (1)(b).

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 374, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-16. L. 77: p. 1734, § 12. L. 81: p. 1842, § 1.

Cross references: For abatement and refund of taxes, see § 39-1-113; for abatement or cancellation of taxes, see § 39-10-114.

ANNOTATION

Board of assessment appeals may conduct de novo review in reviewing taxpayer's appeal from property tax administrator. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Valley Country Club, 792 P.2d 299 (Colo. 1990).

By approving taxpayer's petition "conditionally" or otherwise and submitting it to the property tax administrator for further action, the board of county commissioners' procedural rights as a party ended under the statutory scheme governing abatement and refund proceedings. Huerfano County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 976 P.2d 893 (Colo. App. 1999).

39-2-117. Applications for exemption - review - annual reports - procedures - rules.

      1. Every application filed on or after January 1, 1990, claiming initial exemption of real and personal property from general taxation pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 and 39-3-116 shall be made on forms prescribed and furnished by the administrator, shall contain such information as specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (1), and shall be signed by the owner of such property or his or her authorized agent under the penalty of perjury in the second degree and, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (a), shall be accompanied by a payment of one hundred seventy-five dollars, which shall be credited to the property tax exemption fund created in subsection (8) of this section. The administrator shall examine and review each application submitted, and, if it is determined that the exemption therein claimed is justified and in accordance with the intent of the law, the exemption shall be granted, the same to be effective upon such date in the year of application as the administrator shall determine, but in no event shall the exemption apply to any year prior to the year preceding the year in which application is made. The decision of the administrator shall be issued in writing and a copy thereof furnished to the applicant and to the assessor, treasurer, and board of county commissioners of the county in which the property is located. (1) (a) (I) Every application filed on or after January 1, 1990, claiming initial exemption of real and personal property from general taxation pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 and 39-3-116 shall be made on forms prescribed and furnished by the administrator, shall contain such information as specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (1), and shall be signed by the owner of such property or his or her authorized agent under the penalty of perjury in the second degree and, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (a), shall be accompanied by a payment of one hundred seventy-five dollars, which shall be credited to the property tax exemption fund created in subsection (8) of this section. The administrator shall examine and review each application submitted, and, if it is determined that the exemption therein claimed is justified and in accordance with the intent of the law, the exemption shall be granted, the same to be effective upon such date in the year of application as the administrator shall determine, but in no event shall the exemption apply to any year prior to the year preceding the year in which application is made. The decision of the administrator shall be issued in writing and a copy thereof furnished to the applicant and to the assessor, treasurer, and board of county commissioners of the county in which the property is located.
      2. On all properties for which an application is pending in the office of the administrator, taxes shall not be due and payable until such determination has been made. Such property shall not be listed for the tax sale, and no delinquent interest will be charged on any portion of the exemption that is denied.
      3. No later than June 1 of each year, the administrator shall provide to the assessor, treasurer, and board of county commissioners of each county a list of all applications for property tax exemption currently pending in the office of the administrator.
      1. Any users of real and personal property for which exemption from general taxation is requested pursuant to any of the provisions of sections 39-3-107 to 39-3-113.5 may be required to provide such information as the property tax administrator determines to be necessary.
      2. Except as otherwise provided in this subparagraph (II), any application filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) claiming exemption from taxation pursuant to section 39-3-106 or 39-3-106.5 shall contain the following information: The legal description and address of the real property or the address of the personal property being claimed as exempt; the name and address of the owner of such property; the name and telephone number of the agent of such property; the date the owner acquired such property; the date the owner commenced using the property for religious purposes; a complete list of all uses of the property other than by the owner thereof during the previous twelve months; the total amount of gross income specified in section 39-3-106.5 (1)(b)(I) and the total amount of gross rental income resulting to the owner of such property during the previous twelve months from uses for purposes other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5; and the total number of hours during the previous twelve months that such property was used for purposes other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5. For purposes of this subparagraph (II), if the owner did not own the property being claimed as exempt during the entire twelve-month period prior to filing such application, the application shall contain the required information for that portion of the twelve-month period for which such property was owned by the owner making application. Such application shall also include a declaration that sets forth the religious mission and religious purposes of the owner of the property being claimed as exempt and the uses of such property that are in the furtherance of such mission and purposes. Such declaration shall be presumptive as to the religious purposes for which such property is used. If the administrator is unable to determine whether the property qualifies for exemption based solely on the information specified in this subparagraph (II), the administrator may require additional information, but only to the extent that the additional information is necessary to determine the exemption status of the property. The administrator may challenge any declaration included in the application only upon the grounds that the religious mission and purposes are not religious beliefs sincerely held by the owner of such property, that the property being claimed as exempt is not actually used for the purposes set forth in such application, or that the property being claimed as exempt is used for private gain or corporate profit.
      3. Any application filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) claiming exemption from taxation pursuant to section 39-3-116 shall contain such information specified in subparagraphs (I) and (II) of this paragraph (b) as is applicable for the purposes for which such property is used.
  1. No assessor shall classify any real or personal property as being exempt from taxation pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 or 39-3-116 in any year unless the application for exemption for the current year has been reviewed and has been granted as provided for by law, nor shall any assessor classify any real or personal property as being taxable after having been notified in writing that such property has been determined to be exempt from taxation by the property tax administrator.
      1. On and after January 1, 1990, and no later than April 15 of each year, every owner of real or personal property for which exemption from general taxation has previously been granted shall file a report with the administrator upon forms furnished by the division, containing such information relative to the exempt property as specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (3), and signed under the penalty of perjury in the second degree. Each such annual report shall be accompanied by a payment of seventy-five dollars, which shall be credited to the property tax exemption fund created in subsection (8) of this section. Each such annual report filed later than April 15, but prior to July 1, shall be accompanied by a late filing fee of two hundred fifty dollars; except that the administrator shall have the authority to waive all or a portion of the late filing fee for good cause shown as determined by the administrator by rules adopted pursuant to subsection (7) of this section. On and after January 1, 1990, every owner of real or personal property for which exemption from general taxation has previously been granted pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-111 and that is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 for less than two hundred eight hours during the calendar year or if the use of the property for such purposes results in annual gross rental income to such owner of less than twenty-five thousand dollars shall not be required to file any annual report pursuant to the provisions of this subsection (3). In order to claim such exemption, in lieu of such annual report, the owner shall annually file with the administrator a declaration stating that the property is used for such purposes for less than two hundred eight hours during the calendar year or such use results in annual gross rental income to the owner of less than twenty-five thousand dollars. (3) (a) (I) On and after January 1, 1990, and no later than April 15 of each year, every owner of real or personal property for which exemption from general taxation has previously been granted shall file a report with the administrator upon forms furnished by the division, containing such information relative to the exempt property as specified in paragraph (b) of this subsection (3), and signed under the penalty of perjury in the second degree. Each such annual report shall be accompanied by a payment of seventy-five dollars, which shall be credited to the property tax exemption fund created in subsection (8) of this section. Each such annual report filed later than April 15, but prior to July 1, shall be accompanied by a late filing fee of two hundred fifty dollars; except that the administrator shall have the authority to waive all or a portion of the late filing fee for good cause shown as determined by the administrator by rules adopted pursuant to subsection (7) of this section. On and after January 1, 1990, every owner of real or personal property for which exemption from general taxation has previously been granted pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-111 and that is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 for less than two hundred eight hours during the calendar year or if the use of the property for such purposes results in annual gross rental income to such owner of less than twenty-five thousand dollars shall not be required to file any annual report pursuant to the provisions of this subsection (3). In order to claim such exemption, in lieu of such annual report, the owner shall annually file with the administrator a declaration stating that the property is used for such purposes for less than two hundred eight hours during the calendar year or such use results in annual gross rental income to the owner of less than twenty-five thousand dollars.
      2. In the event an annual report is not received by June 1 from an owner of real or personal property for which an exemption was granted for the previous year pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-107 to 39-3-113.5 or 39-3-116, the administrator shall give notice in writing to such property owner by June 15 that failure to comply by July 1 shall operate as a forfeiture of any right to claim exemption of previously exempt property from general taxation for the current year. Failure to timely file such annual report on or before July 1 shall operate as a forfeiture of any right to claim exemption of such property from general taxation for the year in which such failure occurs, unless an application is timely filed and an exemption granted pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section. The administrator shall review each report filed to determine if such property continues to qualify for exemption, and, if it is determined that the property does not so qualify, the owner of such property shall be notified in writing of the disqualification, and the assessor, treasurer, and board of county commissioners of the county in which the property is located shall also be so notified.
      3. In the event an annual report is not received by June 1 from an owner of real or personal property for which an exemption was granted for the previous year pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-106 or 39-3-106.5, the administrator shall give notice in writing to such property owner by June 15 that failure to file a delinquent report during a twelve-month period commencing the following July 1 shall operate as the forfeiture of any right to claim exemption of previously exempt property from general taxation for the year in which such notice is given. Upon the filing of the delinquent annual report, a late filing fee of two hundred fifty dollars shall be paid, which shall be credited to the property tax exemption fund created in subsection (8) of this section; except that the administrator shall have the authority to waive all or a portion of the late filing fee for good cause shown as determined by the administrator by rules adopted pursuant to subsection (7) of this section. Failure to file the delinquent annual report within the twelve-month period shall result in the forfeiture of any right to claim exemption of such property from general taxation for the year in which such failure to file the annual report first occurred. The administrator shall review each report filed to determine if the property continues to qualify for exemption, and, if it is determined that the property does not so qualify, the owner of the property shall be notified in writing of the disqualification, and the assessor, treasurer, and board of county commissioners of the county in which the property is located shall also be so notified.
      1. Any user of property which has been exempted pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-107 to 39-3-113.5 may be required to provide such information as the property tax administrator determines to be necessary in order to ascertain whether the users and usages of the property are in compliance with the provisions of said sections.
        1. Except as otherwise provided in sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (II), any annual report filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) claiming exemption from taxation pursuant to section 39-3-106 or 39-3-106.5 shall contain the following information: The legal description or address of the property being claimed as exempt; the name and address of the owner of such property; a complete list of all uses of such property other than by the owner thereof during the previous calendar year; the amount of total gross income specified in section 39-3-106.5 (1)(b)(I) and the total amount of gross rental income resulting from uses of such property that are not for the purposes set forth in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5; and the total number of hours that such property was used for purposes other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5. Such annual report shall also include a declaration of the religious mission and purposes of the owner of such property claimed as being exempt and the uses of such property that are in the furtherance of such mission and purposes. Such declaration shall be presumptive as to the religious mission and religious purposes of the owner of such property. If the administrator is unable to determine whether the property continues to qualify for exemption based solely on the information specified in this subparagraph (II), the administrator may require additional information, but only to the extent that the additional information is necessary to determine the exemption status of the property. The administrator may challenge any declaration included in such annual report only upon the grounds that the religious mission and purposes are not religious beliefs sincerely held by the owner of such property, that such property is not actually used for the purposes set forth in the annual report, or that the property being claimed as exempt is used for private gain or corporate profit.
        2. For the purposes of sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (II), if the owner of property being claimed as exempt did not own such property during the entire previous calendar year, the annual report filed by such owner shall contain the information required in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (II) for that portion of the previous calendar year during which such property was owned by such owner.
      2. Any annual report filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) claiming exemption from taxation pursuant to section 39-3-116 shall contain such information specified in subparagraphs (I) and (II) of this paragraph (b) as is applicable for the purposes for which such property is used.
  2. If, subsequent to the time that exemption of any property was initially granted or annually renewed, as provided in subsections (1) and (3) of this section, it is determined that such exemption was granted or renewed as the result of false or misleading information contained in the initial application, the annual report, or any false information provided by owners or users of such property, then the property tax administrator shall revoke the exemption, and taxes shall be assessed against such property for the year or years affected by such false or misleading information, and all delinquent interest provided by law shall apply to such taxes.
      1. If the administrator tentatively determines that the property does not so qualify, except for the disqualification for failure to file an annual report required in subsection (3) of this section, he shall notify, by certified mail, the owner of such property of his tentative determination. The administrator shall also notify the owner of the owner's right to a public hearing, as provided for in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (a). (5) (a) (I) If the administrator tentatively determines that the property does not so qualify, except for the disqualification for failure to file an annual report required in subsection (3) of this section, he shall notify, by certified mail, the owner of such property of his tentative determination. The administrator shall also notify the owner of the owner's right to a public hearing, as provided for in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (a).
      2. Within thirty days after the issuance of a tentative determination, the owner may request a public hearing regarding the determination. Upon the making of such a request, the administrator or his designees shall provide said owner with a public hearing at which said owner and any users of the property other than the owner, if their use is relevant to the determination of whether the property is exempt, shall be heard if they so desire. Such hearing shall be held no later than ninety days following the issuance of the tentative determination.
      3. Upon the conclusion of such hearing, the administrator shall provide the owner and any users sixty days within which to comply, so as to retain the exemption. If the owner fails to comply within sixty days, the administrator shall notify the owner in writing that the property has been disqualified.
      4. The owner may waive his right to a public hearing by filing with the administrator a written statement that said right is waived. Upon receipt of such waiver, the administrator shall issue a final determination, in writing, which notifies the owner that the property does not qualify for exemption.
      5. If the owner does not request a public hearing, as provided for in subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (a), or does not file a waiver of his right to a public hearing, as provided for in subparagraph (IV) of this paragraph (a), the administrator shall provide the owner sixty days from the issuance of the tentative determination to file any additional information relevant to the determination of whether the property is exempt. At the conclusion of such sixty-day period, the administrator shall issue a final determination, in writing, which notifies the owner whether the property qualifies for exemption.
    1. An appeal from any decision of the administrator may be taken by the board of county commissioners of the county wherein such property is located, or by any owner of taxable property in such county, or by the owner of the property for which exemption is claimed if exemption has been denied or revoked in full or in part. Any such appeal shall be taken to the board of assessment appeals pursuant to the provisions of section 39-2-125 no later than thirty days following the decision of the administrator.
  3. If the decision of the board is against the petitioner, the petitioner may petition the court of appeals for judicial review thereof according to the Colorado appellate rules and the provisions of section 24-4-106 (11), C.R.S. If the decision of the board is against the respondent, the respondent, upon the recommendation of the board that it is a matter of statewide concern, may petition the court of appeals for judicial review according to the Colorado appellate rules and the provisions of section 24-4-106 (11), C.R.S.
  4. The administrator shall adopt rules to implement the provisions of this section pursuant to the provisions of article 4 of title 24, C.R.S., including any rules necessary to specify what shall qualify as "good cause shown" for purposes of waiving all or a portion of the late filing fees specified in subparagraphs (I) and (III) of paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section.
  5. All fees collected pursuant to this section shall be transmitted to the state treasurer who shall credit such revenues to the property tax exemption fund, which fund is hereby created in the state treasury. The moneys in the fund shall be subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly for the direct and indirect costs of the administration of this article.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 374, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-17. L. 72: p. 568, § 49. L. 83: (6) added, p. 2086, § 1, effective October 13. L. 86: (1) to (4) amended, p. 1104, § 2, effective May 16. L. 87: (1)(a), (3)(a), and (5) amended, pp. 1399, 1400, §§ 1, 2, effective July 1. L. 88: (1)(a) and (3)(a) amended, p. 1292, § 25, effective May 23. L. 89: (1), (2), and (3)(b) amended, p. 1482, § 6, effective April 23; (1) to (3) amended and (7) added, p. 1486, § 4, effective June 7. L. 90: (6) amended, p. 1689, § 6, effective June 9. L. 91: (1)(b)(II), (3)(b)(II), and (5)(a) amended, pp. 1960, 1955, §§ 7, 1, effective June 7. L. 92: (1)(a) and (4) amended, p. 2222, § 2, effective April 9. L. 2003: (1)(b)(II) and (3)(b)(II)(A) amended, p. 866, § 1, effective April 7; (1)(a), (3)(a)(I), (3)(a)(III), and (5)(b) amended and (8) added, p. 1465, § 3, effective July 1. L. 2009: (1)(a) amended, (SB 09-042), ch. 176, p. 780, § 2, effective August 5. L. 2010: (1)(a)(I), (3)(a)(I), (3)(a)(III), and (7) amended, (HB 10-1386), ch. 328, p. 1516, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2011: (3)(a)(I) amended, (HB 11-1010), ch. 275, p. 1239, § 1, effective August 10. L. 2013: (1)(a)(I), (1)(b)(I), (1)(b)(II), (2), (3)(a)(I), (3)(a)(II), (3)(b)(I), and (3)(b)(II)(A) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1700, § 117, effective August 7.

Cross references: For perjury in the second degree and the penalty therefor, see §§ 18-8-503 and 18-1.3-501.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Property Tax Exemptions for Religious And Nonprofit Organizations", see 18 Colo. Law. 1939 (1989). For article, "Colorado State and Local Tax Exemptions for Charitable Organizations-Part I", see 28 Colo. Law. 57 (Nov. 1999).

Exemption from property tax is initiated at state level, rather than county level, by filing an application for exemption with the property tax administrator. West-Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 199 Colo. 334 , 608 P.2d 339 (1980).

Property tax exemptions are determined on an annual basis under the property tax scheme, based on the use of the property in each tax year. St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church v. State Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 762 P.2d 775 (Colo. App. 1988); Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

Implicit within the property tax scheme is a requirement that in order for the property to qualify for tax exemption for that tax year, there must be at least some actual use of the property for tax exempt purposes in that tax year. Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

County not indispensable party in appeal of exemption denial. The county in which the affected property is located is not an indispensable party in an appeal to the state board of assessment appeals (board) of the property tax administrator's denial of exemption. West-Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 199 Colo. 334 , 608 P.2d 339 (1980).

The procedure for determining the running of the thirty-day period in this section prevails over § 24-4-105 which deals generally with administrative proceedings. Colo. Rocky Mtn. Sch., Inc. v. Shriver, 689 P.2d 651 (Colo. App. 1984).

The presumption in subsection (1)(b)(II) that stated uses were actually in furtherance of taxpayer's religious purposes applies throughout the application process, including at any stage of review. Grand County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2016 COA 2 , 401 P.3d 561.

And the presumption applies to the board's review of the tax administrator's decision. Grand County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2016 COA 2 , 401 P.3d 561.

Under subsection (6), only the district court in the county where the property is situated has subject matter jurisdiction over appeals of administrative decisions concerning exemptions. The district court in which the property was situated did not have subject matter jurisdiction over a case on appeal because Plaintiff did not timely perfect the review proceedings in said court. Instead, the complaint for review was filed in another district court which did not have subject matter jurisdiction and which attempted to transfer the case to the proper district court. Mile High United Way v. Assessment App., 801 P.2d 3 (Colo. App. 1990) (decided under law in effect prior to 1990 amendments).

Legislative grant of authority is granted to the administrator under the plain language of subsection (6) to seek review of adverse board decision concerning property tax years beginning on and after January 1, 1984. Maurer v. Young Life, 779 P.2d 1317 ( Colo. 1989 ); Maurer v. Loyal Order of Moose Lodge, 779 P.2d 1345 ( Colo. 1989 ); Maurer v. Denver Urban Economic Dev., 781 P.2d 111 (Colo. App. 1989).

Court of appeals has jurisdiction to hear a property owner's appeal from the board's determination. Giving consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to the entire statutory scheme, subsection (6) must be applied to grant an applicant for tax exemption who receives a favorable ruling from the tax administrator and, therefore, does not petition for board review, the right to seek judicial review of an adverse decision of the board. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

In finding that property owner is not entitled to a religious purposes exemption, except for chapels and religious activity center on its property, board did not apply proper legal standards and therefore erred as a matter of law. In its analysis, the board did not address property owner's declaration of religious purposes contained in its application, the effect of the declaration's presumed validity, or whether the presumption had been overcome. Because such declarations are presumptive with regard to the religious purposes for which property is used under subsection (1)(b)(II), the board erred as a matter of law. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

The correct inquiry is set forth in this section and § 39-3-106 . The tax administrator and then the board must review the property owner's application and evidence to determine whether the owner's use of the property is for a religious purpose, consistent with the owner's declaration of religious mission and purpose. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

Board also did not apply correct legal standard and, therefore, erred as a matter of law in finding that property owner did not qualify for a charitable use exemption. Assuming that the board correctly applied § 39-3-106.5 to determine that the property owner exceeded the adjusted hours or gross rental income for non-exempt use to entitle it to fully exempt status, the board then should have considered whether the property owner was entitled to a partial charitable use exemption. Based on the record, the board also did not properly consider whether the property owner used the properties solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes. Accordingly, the board did not apply the proper legal standards when it found that the property owner did not qualify for a charitable use exemption. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

39-2-118. Recommendations to governor.

No later than the first day of December of each year, the property tax administrator, in cooperation with a committee from the Colorado assessors association, shall submit to the governor for transmittal to the general assembly any recommendations concerning the administration and enforcement of the property tax laws which he deems necessary and in the public interest.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 375, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-18.

39-2-119. Annual report.

As soon after the end of each calendar year as may be practicable, the property tax administrator shall prepare a report covering the activities of the division of property taxation during such calendar year. Such report shall set forth the aggregate valuation for assessment of all taxable property in the state and in each county thereof, by classes and subclasses, for the two latest calendar years, the levies imposed by each political subdivision during the preceding calendar year, and the aggregate amount of taxes produced by such levies in the state and each county thereof, together with such other information as the administrator deems necessary. Such report shall be published in accordance with the provisions of section 24-1-136, C.R.S. Copies of the report shall be furnished to the governor and made available for distribution to the public.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 375, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-19. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 844, § 78, effective July 1. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 862, § 3, effective August 7.

39-2-120. Powers of property tax administrator.

The property tax administrator shall be authorized to certify official acts of the division of property taxation, to administer oaths, issue subpoenas, compel attendance of witnesses and the production of books, accounts, and records, and to cause depositions to be taken. In case any person fails to comply with any subpoena or refuses to testify on any matter upon which he may be lawfully questioned, any court having jurisdiction in the matter may, upon application of the property tax administrator, compel obedience in the manner provided by law.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 376, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-20.

39-2-121. Enforcement of orders.

The property tax administrator may compel compliance with his unappealed orders or, after approval by the board of assessment appeals of appealed orders, by proceedings in mandamus, injunction, or by other appropriate civil remedies.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 376, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-21.

39-2-122. Notice prior to injunction.

No injunction shall be issued suspending or staying any order of the property tax administrator except upon ten days' notice to the property tax administrator of the application for such injunction and a hearing thereon.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 376, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-22.

39-2-123. Board of assessment appeals created - members - compensation.

  1. On and after July 1, 1971, the Colorado tax commission shall be known as the board of assessment appeals, which agency is hereby created within the department of local affairs. The board shall be a quasi-judicial tribunal.
  2. Effective July 1, 1991, the existing board of assessment appeals is abolished, and the terms of members of the board then serving are terminated. Effective July 1, 1991, the new board shall be comprised of three members, who shall be appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate. Appointments to the board shall be as follows: One member shall be appointed for a term of two years, and two members shall be appointed for terms of four years. Thereafter, appointments to the board shall be for terms of four years each. In order to allow for appeals to be heard timely, up to six additional members may be appointed to the board by the governor with the consent of the senate. Such additional members shall be appointed for terms of one state fiscal year each. Members of the board shall be experienced in property valuation and taxation and shall be public employees, as defined in section 24-10-103 (4)(a), who are not subject to the state personnel system laws. One of such members shall be or shall have been, within the five years immediately preceding the date of initial appointment, actively engaged in agriculture. On and after June 1, 1993, members shall be licensed or certificated pursuant to the provisions of part 6 of article 10 of title 12. Service on the board shall be at the pleasure of the governor, who may appoint a replacement to serve for the unexpired term of any member. Such replacement shall be appointed with the consent of the senate. Any other vacancies on the board shall be filled by appointment by the governor with the consent of the senate for the unexpired term.
  3. In addition to any other compensation provided for by law, members of the board shall be compensated one hundred fifty dollars per diem. In addition, members of the board who do not reside in the Denver metropolitan area, which consists of the counties of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Gilpin, and Jefferson, shall be reimbursed for their actual and necessary travel expenses as determined by the executive director of the department of local affairs. Per diem compensation not to exceed two hundred twenty days in any calendar year shall be paid only when the board is in session or when any member thereof conducts a hearing pursuant to section 39-2-127. The board shall be in session when it determines that it is necessary or as directed by the executive director of the department of local affairs.
  4. The board of assessment appeals shall exercise its powers, duties, and functions under the department of local affairs as if it were transferred to said department by a type 1 transfer under the provisions of the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968".

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 376, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-23. L. 76: (3) amended, p. 757, § 11, January 1, 1977. L. 77: (2) amended, p. 1735, § 13, effective June 20. L. 83: (3) amended, p. 1500, § 1, effective May 26. L. 85: (3) amended, p. 1219, § 2, effective March 23; (3) amended, p. 1228, § 1, effective July 1. L. 87: (2) amended, p. 913, § 30, effective June 15. L. 88: (2) amended, p. 1296, § 1, effective April 29. L. 89: (2) amended, p. 1453, § 8, effective June 7. L. 91: (2) and (3) amended, p. 1977, § 1, effective July 1. L. 92: (2) amended, p. 2206, § 2, effective June 3. L. 2013: (2) amended, (SB 13-146), ch. 388, p. 2258, § 1, effective July 1; (2) amended, (SB 13-155), ch. 392, p. 2283, § 15, effective July 1. L. 2019: (2) amended, (HB 19-1172), ch. 136, p. 1728, § 250, effective October 1.

Editor's note:

  1. Amendments to subsection (3) by House Bill 85-1105 and House Bill 85-1106 were harmonized.
  2. Amendments to subsection (2) by Senate Bill 13-146 and Senate Bill 13-155 were harmonized.

Cross references: For the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968", see article 1 of title 24.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Appealing Property Tax Assessments", see 15 Colo. Law. 798 (1986).

Board's rules and regulations were not abolished by legislation abolishing existing board and immediately creating a newly constituted one, nor was board required to re-enact, ratify, or promulgate new rules and regulations, since annual legislation by the general assembly specifically postponing the expiration of the board's rules effectively postponed the rules of the "old" board and continued their application under the "new" board. 1st Am. Sav. Bank v. Boulder County, 888 P.2d 360 (Colo. App. 1994).

Board rule requiring parties to exchange witness lists ten days prior to hearing has a legitimate relationship to express statutory provisions since need for the rule is paramount where the board's procedures do not allow discovery. 1st Am. Sav. Bank v. Boulder County, 888 P.2d 360 (Colo. App. 1994).

Board abused its discretion in denying the right to call a witness it had inadvertently omitted from its witness list where taxpayer's attorney had implicit knowledge of the witness and subject matter of the witness' testimony and no prejudice was claimed if the testimony was allowed. 1st Am. Sav. Bank v. Boulder County, 888 P.2d 360 (Colo. App. 1994).

39-2-124. Executive director to furnish employees and clerical assistance.

Clerical assistance and such employees as are necessary shall be furnished for the board by the executive director of the department of local affairs.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 377, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-24.

39-2-125. Duties of the board - board of assessment appeals cash fund - creation.

  1. The board of assessment appeals shall perform the following duties, such performance to be in accordance with the applicable provisions of article 4 of title 24, C.R.S.:
    1. Adopt procedures of practice before and procedures of review by the board;
      1. Hear appeals from orders and decisions of the property tax administrator filed not later than thirty days after the entry of any such order or decision.
      2. Such hearings shall include evidence as to the rationale of such order or decision and the detailed data in support thereof.
    2. Hear appeals from decisions of county boards of equalization filed not later than thirty days after the entry of any such decision;
    3. Repealed.
    4. Hear appeals from determinations by county assessors when a county board of equalization or an assessor has failed to respond within the time provided by statute to an appeal properly filed by a taxpayer;
    5. Hear appeals from decisions of boards of county commissioners filed not later than thirty days after the entry of any such decision when a claim for refund or abatement of taxes is denied in full or in part;
    6. Repealed.
    7. Collect any filing fee that shall accompany a taxpayer's request for a hearing before the board pursuant to this section. All fees collected by the board shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit the same to the board of assessment appeals cash fund, which fund is hereby created in the state treasury and referred to in this paragraph (h) as the "cash fund". All moneys credited to the cash fund shall be used in accordance with the requirements of this section and shall not be deposited in or transferred to the general fund of this state or any other fund. The moneys credited to the cash fund shall be available for appropriation by the general assembly to the board of assessment appeals in the annual general appropriation act. In making the annual appropriation to the board of assessment appeals under the annual general appropriation act, the general assembly shall consider available revenues and reserve balances in the cash fund. Any interest earned on amounts in the cash fund shall be credited to the cash fund. Any request for a hearing before the board pursuant to sections 39-2-117 (5)(b), 39-4-108 (8), 39-8-108 (1), and 39-10-114.5 (1) shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee as follows:
      1. For any person other than a taxpayer pro se, a fee of one hundred one dollars and twenty-five cents for each tract, parcel, or lot of real property and for each schedule of personal property included in such request; except that, if any request for a hearing before the board involves more than one tract, parcel, or lot owned by the same taxpayer and involves the same issue regarding the valuation of such real property, only one filing fee shall be required for such request for a hearing.
      2. For any person who is a taxpayer pro se, for the first two requests for a hearing within a fiscal year, the taxpayer shall not be required to pay a filing fee, and for each additional request within such fiscal year, a fee of thirty-three dollars and seventy-five cents for each tract, parcel, or lot of real property, and for each schedule of personal property included in such request; except that, if any request for a hearing before the board involves more than one tract, parcel, or lot owned by the same taxpayer and involves the same issue regarding the valuation of such real property, only one filing fee shall be required for such request for a hearing.

    (1.5) As used in this section, notwithstanding any other law, "taxpayer pro se" includes the trustee of a trust.

  2. Complaints filed by the property tax administrator shall be advanced on the calendar and shall take precedence over other matters pending before the board.
  3. Effective January 1, 1983, the consideration of a property's market value in the ordinary course of trade and the comparison of a property with other properties of known or recognized value by the board when considering the market approach to appraisal in its review of the determination of a property's actual value are subject to the provisions of section 39-1-103 (8).

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 377, § 1. L. 71: p. 1245, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-25. L. 73: p. 1438, § 1. L. 76: (1)(c) amended, p. 757, § 12, effective January 1, 1977. L. 77: (1)(f) amended and (3) added, p. 1735, §§ 14, 15, effective June 20. L. 79: (1)(g) added, p. 1461, § 1, effective July 1. L. 81: (1)(f) amended, p. 1843, § 1, effective May 18; (3) amended, p. 1831, § 4, effective June 12. L. 83: (1)(d)(I) repealed, p. 1491, § 7, effective April 21; (3) amended, p. 1483, § 5, effective April 22; (1)(d) repealed, p. 1508, § 5, effective June 2; (1)(f) amended, p. 2086, § 2, effective October 13. L. 84: (1)(c) amended, p. 1001, § 3, effective March 5. L. 85: (1)(c) amended, p. 1219, § 1, effective March 24. L. 88: (1)(c) amended, p. 1296, § 2, effective April 29. L. 90: (1)(c)(I) amended, p. 1709, § 1, effective May 22. L. 91: (1)(c)(I) amended, p. 1978, § 2, effective July 1. L. 92: IP(1) amended and (1)(h) added, p. 2207, § 3, effective June 3. L. 2002: (1)(g) repealed, p. 1361, § 15, effective July 1. L. 2003: IP(1) and (1)(h) amended, p. 1465, § 2, effective July 1. L. 2008: (1)(h) amended, p. 2147, § 25, effective June 4. L. 2012: (1.5) added, (HB 12-1307), ch. 216, p. 929, § 2, effective August 8. L. 2013: (1)(c) and IP(1)(h) amended, (SB 13-146), ch. 388, p. 2259, § 2, effective July 1.

Cross references: (1) For the legislative declaration contained in the 2008 act amending subsection (1)(h), see section 1 of chapter 417, Session Laws of Colorado 2008.

(2) For the legislative declaration in the 2012 act adding subsection (1.5), see section 1 of chapter 216, Session Laws of Colorado 2012.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For article, "Property Tax Assessments in Colorado", see 12 Colo. Law. 563 (1983). For article, "Appealing Property Tax Assessments", see 15 Colo. Law. 798 (1986). For article, "Property Tax Litigation Before the Board of Assessment Appeals", see 35 Colo. Law. 87 (Aug. 2006).

Thirty-day requirements of subsection (1)(c). The initial 30-day requirement in subsection (1)(c) relates to the filing of the appeal, and the subsequent one to the rendering of the decision following the hearing before the appeals board. Honeywell Info. Systems v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 654 P.2d 337 (Colo. App. 1982).

The procedure for determining the running of the 30-day period in this section prevails over § 24-4-105 which deals generally with administrative proceedings. Colo. Rocky Mtn. Sch., Inc. v. Shriver, 689 P.2d 651 (Colo. App. 1984).

Board of assessment appeals may conduct a de novo review in reviewing a taxpayer's appeal from property tax administrator. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. Valley Country Club, 792 P.2d 299 (Colo. 1990).

Board of assessment appeals has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the county board. Language mandating that the board hear appeals from the county board's denial of an abatement is based, by necessity, on a concurrent right of the taxpayer to appeal such denial to the board of assessment appeals. 5050 S. Broadway Corporation v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Comm'rs, 815 P.2d 966 (Colo. App. 1991).

Date of presentation of county board of equalization's resolutions constitutes date of entry for purposes of computing 30-day time period. BQP Industries v. State Bd. of Equalization, 694 P.2d 337 (Colo. App. 1984).

Non-compliance with the 30-day requirement of subsection (1)(c) should be avoided, but it will not constitute reversible error in the absence of any demonstrated damage or prejudice to the taxpayer. Burns v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 820 P.2d 1175 (Colo. App. 1991).

The board's action on taxpayer's administrative appeal is not limited to review of any previous action taken, rather the board is authorized to conduct de novo evidentiary proceedings on the merits in every matter before it including administrative appeals taken from boards of county commissioners in abatement and refund proceedings. D.C. Burns Realty v. Jefferson County, 849 P.2d 900 (Colo. App. 1992).

Apart from timely filing requirement, there are no other statutory jurisdictional requirements for taking administrative appeals before the BAA. Fleisher-Smyth v. Bd. of Assessment App., 865 P.2d 922 (Colo. App. 1993).

Applied in West-Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 199 Colo. 334 , 608 P.2d 339 (1980); Lucchesi v. State, 807 P.2d 1185 (Colo. App. 1990).

39-2-126. Delaying effect of decision - when.

If the finality of a decision of the board of assessment appeals is suspended until after the last day of the calendar year by a pending judicial review, the property tax valuations for the current year shall be those established by the administrator as to utilities under the provisions of article 4 of this title, or by the county assessor or those approved by the county board of equalization, subject to the refund provisions of section 39-8-109.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 377, § 1. L. 71: p. 1245, § 2. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-26.

39-2-127. Board of assessment appeals meetings - proceedings - representation before board.

  1. The board of assessment appeals shall maintain its headquarters in the city and county of Denver but may transact its official business at any other place within the state. All its sessions shall be open to the public, and full and correct minutes thereof shall be kept, and such minutes shall be a public record open to public inspection.
  2. At the direction of the chairman and with the agreement of the parties before the board, one or more of the members of the board of assessment appeals may conduct hearings in Denver or in a county of closer location to the subject property, administer oaths, examine witnesses, receive evidence, issue subpoenas, and render preliminary decisions subject to concurrence and modification by agreement of at least two members of the board. An additional board member may be added after a hearing to review the evidence and hearing transcript or recording and render a decision in the event the board members who conducted the hearing are unable to reach a decision.
  3. Upon request of any member of the board, legal counsel provided by the office of the attorney general shall attend hearings on appeals before the board and shall advise the board as to matters of procedure, evidence, and law arising in the course of such appeals. Upon the board's own motion, legal counsel shall provide other legal services to the board. When the state property tax administrator is a party to the appeal, such legal counsel shall not be the same legal counsel who advises or represents the state property tax administrator at proceedings before the board.
  4. Any person who is a party in a proceeding before the board may appear on his or her own behalf or be represented by an attorney admitted to practice law in this state or by any other individual of his or her choice. A trust may be represented by an attorney admitted to practice law in this state, by the trustee of the trust, or by the trustee's designee.
  5. The board may permit, in its discretion and upon prior written application, the intervention of another affected party in a matter pending before the board. The board may limit or restrict the participation of an intervenor in such manner as the board, in its discretion, orders.
  6. The board of assessment appeals shall issue a written decision for each appeal it hears. Each such written decision must either be a summary decision or a full decision; however, a summary decision may only be issued upon request for a summary decision made by both parties before the board. A full decision must contain specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. A summary decision need not contain specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. If the board has issued a summary decision, a party dissatisfied with the summary decision may file a written request with the board for a full decision. The written request must be received by the board within ten working days after the date on which the summary decision was mailed. Timely filing of the written request with the board is a prerequisite to review of the board's decision by the court of appeals. Upon timely request for a full decision, the board shall issue a full decision and enter it as the final decision in the appeal subject to judicial review by the court of appeals as provided in section 39-8-108 (2) or 39-10-114.5 (2).

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 377, § 1. L. 71: p. 1245, § 3. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-27. L. 85: (2) amended and (3) added, p. 1221, § 1, effective July 1. L. 88: (2) amended and (4) added, p. 1297, § 3, effective April 29. L. 2011: (2) amended and (5) added, (HB 11-1011), ch. 15, p. 41, § 1, effective August 10. L. 2012: (4) amended, (HB 12-1307), ch. 216, p. 929, § 3, effective August 8. L. 2013: (6) added, (SB 13-146), ch. 388, p. 2260, § 3, effective July 1.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in the 2012 act amending subsection (4), see section 1 of chapter 216, Session Laws of Colorado 2012.

39-2-128. Board of assessment appeals may issue orders.

The board of assessment appeals may issue such orders as it deems necessary to ascertain facts and to carry out its decisions, and any such order directed to a county assessor or a county board of equalization shall be enforceable in the district court of the county.

Source: L. 70: R&RE, p. 377, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-3-28. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1491, § 6, effective April 21. L. 2013: Entire section amended, (SB 13-146), ch. 388, p. 2260, § 4, effective July 1.

39-2-129. Advisory committee to the property tax administrator created.

  1. There is hereby created in the department of local affairs the advisory committee to the property tax administrator. Said advisory committee shall exercise its powers and perform its duties and functions under the department of local affairs as if it were transferred to said department by a type 1 transfer under the provisions of the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968", article 1 of title 24, C.R.S.
  2. Repealed.

Source: L. 76: Entire section added, p. 755, § 6, effective July 1. L. 86: Entire section amended, p. 426, § 62, effective March 26. L. 93: (2) repealed, p. 675, § 12, effective May 1.

39-2-130. Membership of the advisory committee - terms - compensation - meetings.

  1. Said advisory committee shall be comprised of the following five members, no more than three of whom shall be affiliated with the same political party and all of whom shall be appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate:
    1. One assessor and one nonassessor appointed from the counties of seventy-five thousand or more population according to the most recent federal census;
    2. One assessor and one nonassessor appointed from the counties of less than seventy-five thousand population according to the most recent federal census; and
    3. One nonassessor from the western slope.
    1. The governor shall appoint one of the nonassessor members as chairman of the advisory committee.
    2. The governor shall appoint the assessor members from among the certified assessors recommended by the Colorado assessors association.
  2. Initially, two members shall be appointed to the advisory committee for two-year terms and three members for four-year terms. Thereafter, appointments to the advisory committee shall be for terms of four years each. Vacancies on the advisory committee shall be filled by appointment of the governor for the unexpired term.
  3. Members of said committee shall be compensated on a per diem allowance basis at the rate of thirty-five dollars per day and shall be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses. Per diem compensation, not to exceed thirty days in any calendar year, shall be paid only when the advisory committee is in session.
  4. The advisory committee shall meet at least quarterly but may meet more frequently upon call of the chairman and may hold hearings as deemed necessary. A quorum of at least three members shall be required to conduct official business.
  5. Repealed.

Source: L. 76: Entire section added, p. 755, § 6, effective July 1. L. 86: (6) added, p. 426, § 63, effective March 26. L. 93: (6) repealed, p. 1792, § 86, effective June 6.

39-2-131. Function of the committee.

    1. It is said committee's function and it shall have and exercise the authority, prior to publication, to review:
      1. Manuals or any part thereof, appraisal procedures, instructions, and guidelines prepared and published by the administrator pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e) and based upon the approaches to appraisal set forth in section 39-1-103 (5)(a) and pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(k); and
      2. Forms, notices, and records approved or prescribed pursuant to the authority of the property tax administrator set forth in section 39-2-109 (1)(d).
    2. Upon completion of such review, said committee shall submit such manuals, appraisal procedures, instructions, guidelines, forms, notices, and records and its recommendations to the state board of equalization for approval or disapproval pursuant to section 39-9-103 (10).
  1. Repealed.

Source: L. 76: Entire section added, p. 756, § 6, effective July 1. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1483, § 6, effective April 22. L. 86: Entire section amended, p. 426, § 64, effective March 26. L. 90: (1) amended, p. 1699, § 27, effective June 9. L. 91: (1) amended, p. 1953, § 2, effective January 1, 1992. L. 93: (2) repealed, p. 1792, § 87, effective June 6.

Exemptions

ARTICLE 3 EXEMPTIONS

Editor's note: This article was repealed and reenacted in 1964 and was subsequently repealed and reenacted in 1989, resulting in the addition, relocation, and elimination of sections as well as subject matter. For amendments to this article prior to 1989, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume and the editor's note before the article 1 heading. Former C.R.S. section numbers prior to 1989 are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated.

Cross references: For applications for exemptions, see § 39-2-117.

Law reviews: For article, "Survey of Colorado Tax Liens", see 14 Colo. Law. 1765 (1985); for article, "Property Tax Exemptions for Religious and Nonprofit Organizations", see 18 Colo. Law. 1939 (1989); for article, "A Survey of the Law of Colorado Nonprofit Entities", see 27 Colo. Law. 5 (April 1998).

Section

PART 1 PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM TAXATION

39-3-101. Legislative declaration - presumption of charitable purpose.

The general assembly recognizes that only the judiciary may make a final decision as to whether or not any given property is used for charitable purposes within the meaning of the Colorado constitution; nevertheless, in order to guide members of the public and public officials alike in the making of their day-to-day decisions and to assist in the avoidance of litigation, the general assembly hereby finds, declares, and determines that the uses of property which are set forth in this part 1 as uses for charitable purposes benefit the people of Colorado and lessen the burdens of government by performing services which government would otherwise be required to perform. Therefore, property used for such purposes shall be presumed to be owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit, and, consequently, property used for such purposes is entitled to be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of this part 1 and the Colorado constitution. This legislative finding, declaration, determination, and presumption shall not be questioned by the administrator and shall be entitled to great weight in any and every court.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1470, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 1032, § 66, effective June 1.

ANNOTATION

Law reviews. For comment on Young Life Campaign v. Chaffee County appearing below, see 29 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 143 (1956).

Annotator's note. The cases annotated under this section were decided under § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article.

For when home for aged deemed charitable, see Stanbro v. Baptist Home Ass'n of Colo. for Aged, 172 Colo. 572 , 475 P.2d 23 (1970).

Charity, in legal sense, defined as gift. A charity, in the legal sense may be more fully defined as a gift to be applied consistently with existing laws for the benefit of an indefinite number of persons by erecting or maintaining public buildings or works or otherwise lessening the burdens of government. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Denver & R. G. R. R. Employees' Relief Ass'n, 70 Colo. 592 , 203 P. 850 (1922); Am. Water Works Ass'n v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 38 Colo. App. 341, 563 P.2d 359 (1976).

Charitable exemptions to be liberally construed. While charitable purpose as an end will be strictly construed as long as the end is clearly established as charitable, the means used to achieve that end will be liberally construed as a use for a charitable purpose. West Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 652 P.2d 564 (Colo. 1982).

Statutory provisions exempting from taxation properties used for charitable purposes are liberally construed. Horton v. Colo. Springs Masonic Bldg. Soc'y, 64 Colo. 529, 173 P. 61 (1918).

There is no requirement in this section that the property be owned and used by the same entity. Maurer v. Denver Urban Economic Dev., 781 P.2d 111 (Colo. App. 1989).

Tax exemptions must arise directly from constitutional authorization; and, until such authorization is granted, the legislative branch of the government is impotent. Young Life Campaign v. Chaffee County, 134 Colo. 15 , 300 P.2d 535 (1956).

There are no implied tax exemptions. Young Life Campaign v. Chaffee County, 134 Colo. 15 , 300 P.2d 535 (1956).

Exemptions from taxation are to be strictly construed and cannot be enlarged by construction. Murray v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 28 Colo. 427 , 65 P. 26 (1901); San Luis Power & Water Co. v. Trujillo, 93 Colo. 385 , 26 P.2d 537 (1933).

Water treatment facility, built pursuant to a directive issued by the federal environmental protection agency, was not among the types of property specifically exempted from taxation and therefore was not exempt. ASARCO, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Lake County, 916 P.2d 550 (Colo. App. 1995).

Charitable exemptions to be liberally construed. While charitable purpose as an end will be strictly construed as long as the end is clearly established as charitable, the means used to achieve that end will be liberally construed as a use for a charitable purpose. West Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 652 P.2d 564 (Colo. 1982).

39-3-102. Household furnishings - exemption.

  1. Household furnishings, including free-standing household appliances, wall-to-wall carpeting, an independently owned residential solar electric generation facility, and security devices and systems that are not used for the production of income at any time shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. If any household furnishings are used for the production of income for any period of time during the taxable year, such household furnishings shall be taxable for the entire taxable year. An independently owned residential solar electric generation facility shall not be considered to be used for the production of income unless the facility produces income for the owner of the residential real property on which the facility is located. For property tax purposes only, rebates, offsets, credits, and reimbursements specified in section 40-2-124, C.R.S., shall not constitute the production of income. For purposes of this subsection (1), for property tax purposes only, security devices and systems shall include, but shall not be limited to, security doors, security bars, and alarm systems.
  2. For property tax years commencing on and after January 1, 1990, no work of art, as defined in section 39-1-102 (18), which is not subject to annual depreciation and which would otherwise be exempt under this section shall cease to be exempt because it is stored or displayed on premises other than a residence.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1470, § 1, effective April 23; entire section amended, p. 1494, § 1, effective June 8. L. 92: (1) amended, p. 2216, § 4, effective June 2. L. 2010: (1) amended, (HB 10-1267), ch. 425, p. 2199, § 2, effective August 11.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(a) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-103. Personal effects - exemption.

Personal effects which are not used for the production of income at any time shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(b) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-104. Ditches, canals, and flumes - exemption.

Ditches, canals, and flumes which are owned and used by any person exclusively for irrigating land owned by such person shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(c) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-104 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(c) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Irrigation ditch system not taxable separately from land irrigated. A ditch conveying water to a reservoir, whence it is distributed solely for the irrigation of the lands of those entitled to the ditch, is not subject to taxation, separate from the land irrigated: neither is the reservoir nor the bed thereof. Shaw v. Bond, 64 Colo. 366, 171 P. 1142 (1918).

Unless rights retained in ditch by third party. Where a ditch company retains an interest in the ditch with water rights unsold, the ditch is not exempt from taxation. Murray v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 28 Colo. 427, 65 P. 26 (1901).

Water rights deemed improvement to the lands benefitted. Water rights, although represented by stock in a mutual ditch company, are properly classified as an improvement to the land benefitted by the availability of irrigation for purposes of valuation of the real estate for taxes. Beaty v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 101 Colo. 346 , 73 P.2d 982 (1937).

39-3-105. Public libraries - governments - school districts - exemption.

Property, real and personal, of public libraries and of the state and its political subdivisions, including school districts or any cooperative association thereof, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(d) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Property of the fire and police pension association not exempt from taxation under this section. The fire and police pension association (FPPA) is not a political subdivision as defined in § 39-1-102 (12) and the general assembly has not specifically exempted the FPPA's property from taxation as property of the state. City and County of Denver v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 30 P.3d 177 (Colo. 2001).

39-3-106. Property - religious purposes - exemption - legislative declaration.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for religious purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.
  2. In order to guide members of the public and public officials alike in the making of their day-to-day decisions, to provide for a consistent application of the laws, and to assist in the avoidance of litigation, the general assembly hereby finds and declares that religious worship has different meanings to different religious organizations; that the constitutional guarantees regarding establishment of religion and the free exercise of religion prevent public officials from inquiring as to whether particular activities of religious organizations constitute religious worship; that many activities of religious organizations are in the furtherance of the religious purposes of such organizations; that such religious activities are an integral part of the religious worship of religious organizations; and that activities of religious organizations which are in furtherance of their religious purposes constitute religious worship for purposes of section 5 of article X of the Colorado constitution. This legislative finding and declaration shall be entitled to great weight in any and every court.
  3. For the purpose of claiming an exemption pursuant to this section, property that is owned and used by a charitable trust that is exempt from taxation under section 501 (c)(3) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, shall be treated the same as property that is owned and used by any other type of nonprofit organization.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23; entire section R&RE, p. 1485, § 1, effective June 7. L. 2004: (3) added, p. 506, § 3, effective August 4.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(e) as it existed prior to 1989.

Cross references: For the constitutional provision regarding exemptions for property used for religious worship, schools, or charitable purposes, see § 5 of article X of the state constitution.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-106 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(e) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Exemption not perpetual. The exemption provided by article X, § 5 of the state constitution is not perpetual and does not run with the land but is dependent upon the use to which the property is put. St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church v. State Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 762 P.2d 775 (Colo. App. 1988).

Distinction must be made between charitable and religious exemptions. A religious group does not have as a fundamental purpose the providing of services which the state would otherwise have to provide since the state is constitutionally prohibited from such religious involvement. General Conference of Church of God--7th Day v. Carper, 192 Colo. 178 , 557 P.2d 832 (1976).

Constitutionality of tax exemptions for religious organizations. Tax exemptions for religious organizations, in and of themselves, do not violate the establishment clause of the federal constitution. General Conference of Church of God--7th Day v. Carper, 192 Colo. 178 , 557 P.2d 832 (1976).

But tax incentives that inure only to the benefit of religious organizations solely by virtue of their religious nature do violate the establishment clause. Catholic Health Initiatives Colo. v. City of Pueblo, 207 P.3d 812 ( Colo. 2009 ).

Subsection (2) is not unconstitutional on the grounds that it violates the separation of powers doctrine because it permits the general assembly to interpret and apply the state's constitution. Although the final authority to construe the constitution is vested in the judiciary, the general assembly may pass legislation clarifying constitutional provisions. Subsection (2) merely codifies and clarifies the principles of religious neutrality and nonentanglement mandated by the federal and state constitutions and controlling case law. Section 5 of article X of the state constitution exempts from taxation property used for religious worship "unless otherwise provided by general law", thus leaving it absolutely within the power of the legislature to limit, modify, or abolish the exemptions provided by the constitution. Grand County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2016 COA 2 , 401 P.3d 561.

One seeking an exemption must comply with the statutory prerequisites for qualification. St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church v. State Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 762 P.2d 775 (Colo. App. 1988).

The test for determining whether the exemption for property used for religious worship applies depends upon the character of the use to which the property is put. St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church v. State Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 762 P.2d 775 (Colo. App. 1988); Maurer v. Young Life, 779 P.2d 1317 ( Colo. 1989 ); Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Property Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

The inquiry for exemption purposes is whether a property is used for activities that further an organization's religious purposes. The use of the property must be considered in light of the property owner's religious mission and purposes. Grand County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2016 COA 2 , 401 P.3d 561.

If the answer is yes, the property is used for religious worship and is exempt from taxation. Grand County Bd. of Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2016 COA 2 , 401 P.3d 561.

Property tax exemptions based on religious use should not be narrowly construed, and each claim for tax exemption must be resolved on the basis of its own facts under the applicable legal standards. Maurer v. Young Life, 779 P.2d 1317 ( Colo. 1989 ); Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. AM/FM Int'l, 940 P.2d 338 ( Colo. 1997 ); Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Property Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

Implicit within the property tax scheme is a requirement that in order for the property to qualify for tax exemption for that tax year, there must be at least some actual use of the property for tax exempt purposes in that tax year. Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Property Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

Court declines to hold, as a matter of law, that any particular frequency or quantity of use religious in character is required to satisfy the constitutional and statutory standards for an exemption based on religious use. Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, Inc. v. Property Tax Adm'r, 971 P.2d 270 (Colo. App. 1998).

Church failed to sustain its burden of establishing its right to a tax exemption for maintenance building and property on which it was located. First Christian Church v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 711 P.2d 721 (Colo. App. 1985).

Although board must examine the use to which property is put and not the character of the owner, board permissibly considered the character of the property owner in concluding that properties were used for religious worship and reflection. Maurer v. Young Life, 779 P.2d 1317 (Colo. 1989).

Board is permitted and properly concluded that any nonreligious aspects of the activities conducted on properties were incidental to the religious worship and reflection purposes for which the owner claimed such properties were used. Maurer v. Young Life, 779 P.2d 1317 (Colo. 1989).

Thus, social benefit analysis inapplicable to religious groups. While a social benefit analysis may have validity in the determination of charitable exemptions, it has no place in the state's evaluation of its treatment of bona fide religious groups. General Conference of Church of God--7th Day v. Carper, 192 Colo. 178 , 557 P.2d 832 (1976).

For broad interpretation of charitable and religious tax exemptions, see General Conference of Church of God--7th Day v. Carper, 192 Colo. 178 , 557 P.2d 832 (1976).

Religious group entitled to presumption of use consistent with exemption. Where a church organization has no objectives other than religious, charitable, and educational, it is entitled to the benefit of the presumption that when its building is completed, it will be used exclusively for religious purposes. McGlone v. First Baptist Church, 97 Colo. 427 , 50 P.2d 547 (1935).

In finding that property owner is not entitled to a religious purposes exemption, except for chapels and religious activity center on its property, board did not apply proper legal standards and therefore erred as a matter of law. In its analysis, the board did not address property owner's declaration of religious purposes contained in its application, the effect of the declaration's presumed validity, or whether the presumption had been overcome. Because such declarations are presumptive with regard to the religious purposes for which property is used under § 39-2-117 (1)(b) (II), the board erred as a matter of law. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

The correct inquiry is set forth in this section and § 39-2-117 . The tax administrator and then the board must review the property owner's application and evidence to determine whether the owner's use of the property is for a religious purpose, consistent with the owner's declaration of religious mission and purpose. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

39-3-106.5. Tax-exempt property - incidental use - exemption - limitations.

  1. If any property, real or personal, which is otherwise exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-106, is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, such property shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:
    1. The property is used for such purposes for less than two hundred eight hours, adjusted for partial usage if necessary on the basis of the relationship that the amount of time and space used for such other purpose bears to the total available time and space, during the calendar year; or
    2. The use of the property for such purposes results in either:
      1. Less than ten thousand dollars of gross income to the owner of such property which is derived from any unrelated trade or business, as determined pursuant to the provisions of sections 511 to 513 of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended; or
      2. Less than ten thousand dollars of gross rental income to the owner of such property.

    (1.5) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1994, if any property, real or personal, which is otherwise exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-106, is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, such property shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:

    1. The property is used for such purposes for less than two hundred eight hours, adjusted for partial usage if necessary on the basis of the relationship that the amount of time and space used for such other purpose bears to the total available time and space, during the calendar year; or
    2. The use of the property for such purposes results in:
      1. Less than ten thousand dollars of gross income to the owner of such property which is derived from any unrelated trade or business, as determined pursuant to the provisions of sections 511 to 513 of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended; and
      2. Less than ten thousand dollars of gross rental income to the owner of such property.
  2. Except as otherwise provided in section 39-3-108 (3) and subsection (3) of this section, if any property, real or personal, that is otherwise exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-107 to 39-3-113.5 is used on an occasional, noncontinuous basis for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, such property shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:
    1. The property is used for such purposes for less than two hundred eight hours, adjusted for partial usage if necessary on the basis of the relationship that the amount of time and space used for such other purpose bears to the total available time and space, during the calendar year; or
    2. The use of the property for such purposes results in less than twenty-five thousand dollars of gross rental income to the owner of such property.
  3. The requirement that property be used on an occasional basis in order to qualify for the exemption set forth in subsection (2) of this section shall not apply to property, real or personal, that is otherwise exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-111 that is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5.

Source: L. 89: Entire section added, p. 1486, § 2, effective June 7. L. 91: (2) added, p. 1956, § 2, effective June 7. L. 93: (1.5) added, p. 613, § 1, effective April 30. L. 2004: (2)(b) amended, p. 359, § 1, effective August 4. L. 2011: IP(2) amended and (3) added, (HB 11-1010), ch. 275, p. 1240, § 2, effective August 10. L. 2013: IP(1), IP(1.5), IP(2), and (3) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1703, § 118, effective August 7.

ANNOTATION

The state board of assessment appeals (board) did not apply correct legal standard and, therefore, erred as a matter of law in finding that property owner did not qualify for a charitable use exemption. Assuming that the board correctly applied this section to determine that the property owner exceeded the adjusted hours or gross rental income for non-exempt use to entitle it to fully exempt status, the board then should have considered whether the property owner was entitled to a partial charitable use exemption. The board also did not properly consider whether the property owner used the properties solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes. Accordingly, the board did not apply the proper legal standards when it found that the property owner did not qualify for a charitable use exemption. Larimer County Bd. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2013 COA 49 M, 316 P.3d 60.

39-3-107. Property - not-for-profit schools - exemption.

Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for schools which are not held or conducted for private or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1711, § 1, effective June 9.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(f) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-107 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(f) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Validity of section upheld. The validity of this section exempting from taxation educational and charitable institutions is upheld on the ground that if they were not in existence their work would have to be carried on at the expense of the taxpayers. Kemp v. Pillar of Fire, 94 Colo. 41 , 27 P.2d 1036 (1933); United Presbyterian Ass'n v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 167 Colo. 485 , 448 P.2d 967 (1968).

Educational and charitable exemptions upheld on grounds of benefit to citizens. An institution or nonprofit organization, either domestic or foreign, is entitled to the constitutional and statutory tax exemption if its property in this state is used solely and exclusively for schools or for strictly charitable purposes, thus relieving Colorado taxpayers of the burden and expense of providing such advantages to its citizens. Young Life Campaign v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 134 Colo. 15 , 300 P.2d 535 (1956).

Determination of exemption based on all proper and appropriate uses. Because the fundamental object of this section is to exempt school property used for educational purposes, the uses permissible must necessarily embrace all which are proper and appropriate to effect the objects of the institution claiming the benefits of the exemption. Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of Arapahoe County, 29 Colo. 143 , 68 P. 272 (1901); Horton v. Fountain Valley Sch., 98 Colo. 480 , 56 P.2d 933 (1936).

Use incident to main purpose insufficient to alter exempt status. A use incident to the main purpose for which the property is held is not enough to lose tax exemption. Occupation of part of school premises by a bishop and his family does not render the property subject to taxation so long as his dominant purpose in residing therein is to carry out the educational objects of the institution. Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of Arapahoe County, 29 Colo. 143, 68 P. 272 (1901).

Exemption unaffected by receipt of part tuition. The fact that some money is received from a few students as part payment for their tuition, board, and lodging does not, in the circumstances, deprive the property of its exempt character. Kemp v. Pillar of Fire, 94 Colo. 41 , 27 P.2d 1036 (1933).

39-3-108. Property - nonresidential - health-care facility - water company - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:
    1. Such property is nonresidential;
    2. Such property is licensed by the state of Colorado as a health-care facility; or
    3. Such property is used as an integral part of a nonprofit domestic water company.

    (1.3) Nonresidential property that is owned and used solely and exclusively by a qualified amateur sports organization shall be presumed to be owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes. For purposes of this subsection (1.3), the term "qualified amateur sports organization" means any organization organized and operated exclusively to foster local, statewide, national, or international amateur sports competition if such organization is also organized and operated primarily to support and develop amateur athletes for national or international competition in sports; except that no part of the net earnings of such organization inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. So long as a qualified amateur sports organization demonstrates that its membership is open to any individual who is an amateur athlete, coach, trainer, manager, administrator, or official active in such sport or to any amateur sports organization that conducts programs in such sport, or both, the organization shall be presumed to provide public benefits to an indefinite number of persons and to directly benefit the people of Colorado whether or not the right to benefit may depend upon voluntary membership in the organization.

    (1.5) No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption.

  2. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.
    1. When any property of a health-care facility, real or personal, or any portion thereof, which is otherwise exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section, is used for any purpose other than the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, such property or portion thereof shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if the use of the property or portion thereof does not result in gross income derived from any unrelated trade or business to the owner which is in excess of fifteen percent of the total gross revenues derived from the operation of the property. Gross income derived from any unrelated trade or business shall be determined pursuant to the provisions of sections 511 through 513 of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended.
    2. If the use of any property or portion thereof results in gross income derived from any unrelated trade or business in excess of fifteen percent of the total gross revenues to the owner derived from the operation of the property, the administrator shall determine the value of the nonexempt portion of the property for property tax purposes.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1471, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: (1.3), (1.5), and (3) added, pp. 1711, 1702, §§ 2, 35, effective June 9. L. 2013: (3)(a) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1703, § 119, effective August 7.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-108 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

One justification for exempting charitable enterprises from taxation is that they perform functions which tax-supported governmental entities would otherwise be required to perform. W. Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 652 P.2d 564 ( Colo. 1982 ); Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. AM/FM Int'l, 940 P.2d 338 ( Colo. 1997 ).

Neither art. X, § 5 of the state constitution nor this section defines "strictly charitable purposes". Therefore it is for the judiciary to construe their meaning on a case by case basis. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. AM/FM Int'l, 940 P.2d 338 (Colo. 1997).

Court will not reverse a decision of board of assessment appeals supported by the record finding that an applicant's activities did not lessen a burden on government and that the applicant operates on a quid pro quo basis. Bd. of Assessment Appeals v. AM/FM Int'l, 940 P.2d 338 (Colo. 1997).

The sine qua non of lessening the burdens of government is that the charitable work being done by an entity, if not being done by that entity, must be undertaken at public expense. Children's Hosp. Colo. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2018 COA 91 , 439 P.3d 43.

A child care center on a state university campus is not a primary responsibility of government, nor does it perform an activity for which government is responsible or that the government would be forced to assume in the absence of the center's activities. Since the child care center does not lessen the burdens of government, the exemption in this section does not apply. Children's Hosp. Colo. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2018 COA 91 , 439 P.3d 43.

Claimant has burden of proof to establish that activity has a charitable purpose and is used solely for such purpose. Inst. for Research v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 748 P.2d 1346 (Colo. App. 1987).

Right to property tax exemption for charitable use has not been established until it is shown that property is nonresidential. Anderson Ranch Arts Found. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 729 P.2d 992 (Colo. 1986).

Nonresidential use not found and therefore charitable exemption not applicable. Anderson Ranch Arts Found. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 729 P.2d 992 (Colo. 1986).

The 15 percent provision found in subsection (3)(a) does not apply unless the property first qualifies as tax-exempt property under subsection (1)(b). Thus portions of offices that were neither part of a licensed health care facility nor owned by an entity that is a licensed health care facility were not exempt from property taxation. Jefferson County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Prop. Tax Adm'r., 989 P.2d 227 (Colo. App. 1999).

Exempt status unaffected by receipt of money from beneficiaries. The fact that fees are charged for use of facilities is not fatal to a claim for exemption. W. Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 652 P.2d 564 (Colo. 1982).

The national junior college athletic association met all the statutory criteria to constitute a "qualified amateur sports organization" under the provisions of subsection (1.3). Nat'l Jr. Coll. Athletic v. Huddleston, 939 P.2d 509 (Colo. App. 1997).

Gun club did not qualify for a tax exemption pursuant to subsection (1.3), because it did not meet the threshold requirement that it be "organized exclusively" to foster amateur sports competition. Cherry Creek Gun Club, Inc. v. Huddleston, 119 P.3d 592 (Colo. App. 2005).

Evidence insufficient to support claim for exemption. W. Brandt Found., Inc. v. Carper, 652 P.2d 564 (Colo. 1982).

39-3-108.5. Property - community corrections facility - exemption.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is owned and used by a nonprofit community corrections agency for a community correctional facility or program.
  2. As used in this section:
    1. "Community correctional facility or program" shall have the meaning set forth in section 17-27-102 (3), C.R.S., for community corrections program.
    2. "Nonprofit community corrections agency" means any person, agency, corporation, association, or entity that:
      1. Is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended; and
      2. Operates a community correctional facility or program.
  3. The provisions of this section shall apply to property tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1993.

Source: L. 93: Entire section added, p. 614, § 2, effective April 30. L. 95: (2)(a) amended, p. 1108, § 54, effective May 31.

39-3-109. Residential property - integral part of tax-exempt entities - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is residential and the structure and the land upon which such structure is located are used as an integral part of a church, an eleemosynary hospital, an eleemosynary licensed health-care facility, a school, or an institution whose property is otherwise exempt from taxation pursuant to the provisions of this part 1 and which is not leased or rented at any time to persons other than:
    1. Persons who are attending such school as students; or
    2. Persons who are actually receiving care or treatment from such hospital, licensed health-care facility, or institution for physical or mental disabilities and who, in order to receive such care or treatment, are required to be domiciled within such hospital, licensed health-care facility, or institution, or within affiliated residential units.
  2. Persons residing within residential units specified in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section may submit to the administrator, on a form prescribed by the administrator, a certificate signed by a physician licensed to practice in the state of Colorado that the medical condition of such individual requires the individual to reside in such residential unit. If a person residing within such residential unit submits such signed certificate to the administrator pursuant to the provisions of this subsection (2), the portion of such residential property that is utilized by qualified occupants shall be deemed to be property used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit and such portion, but only such portion, shall be exempt under the provisions of subsection (1) of this section. The determination as to what portion of such structure is so utilized shall be made by the administrator on the basis of the facts existing on the annual assessment date for such property, and the administrator shall have the authority to determine a ratio which reflects the value of the nonexempt portion of such structure in relation to the total value of the whole structure and the land upon which such structure is located and which is identical to the ratio of the number of residential units occupied by nonqualified occupants to the total number of occupied residential units in such structure.

    (2.5) No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption.

  3. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1472, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: (2.5) added, p. 1712, § 3, effective June 9. L. 2002: IP(1) amended, p. 1032, § 67, effective June 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-110. Property - integral part of child care center - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is used as an integral part of a child care center:
    1. Which is licensed pursuant to article 6 of title 26, C.R.S.;
    2. Which is maintained for the whole or part of a day for the care of five or more children who are not sixteen years of age or older;
    3. Which is not owned or operated for private gain or corporate profit;
    4. The costs of operation of which, including salaries, are reasonable based upon the services and facilities provided and as compared with the costs of operation of any comparable public institution;
    5. Which provides its services to an indefinite number of persons free of charge or at reduced rates equal to five percent of the gross revenues of such child care center or equal to ten percent of the amount of tuition charged by such child care center to the financially needy or charges on the basis of ability to pay;
    6. The operation of which does not materially enhance, directly or indirectly, the private gain of any individual except as reasonable compensation for services rendered or goods furnished;
    7. The property of which is claimed for exemption does not exceed the amount of property reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the exempt purpose; and
    8. The property of which is irrevocably dedicated to a charitable purpose.

    (1.5) No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption.

  2. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.
  3. The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to any child care center which is operated for religious purposes and which is exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of section 39-3-106 or 39-3-106.5.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1473, § 1, effective April 23; (1)(e) amended and (3) added, p. 1492, § 6, effective June 7. L. 90: (1.5) added, p. 1712, § 4, effective June 9.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

One of the eight requirements to qualify for a property tax exemption under this section specifies that a child care center provides services to an indefinite number of persons either for free or for a reduced rate or charges on the basis of ability to pay. Children's Hosp. Colo. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2018 COA 91 , 439 P.3d 43.

Tax property division rules define the phrase "charges on the basis of ability to pay" to mean "that the total cost for each child is determined by a scale based on the recipient's financial status." This interpretation is not erroneous, nor does it lack reasonable basis in the law. Children's Hosp. Colo. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 2018 COA 91 , 439 P.3d 43.

39-3-111. Property - used by fraternal or veterans' organization - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is used by any fraternal organization, as defined in section 24-21-602 (18), notwithstanding the requirement that such organization be in existence for a period of five years, or by any veterans' organization, as defined in section 24-21-602 (43), notwithstanding the requirement that such organization be in existence for a period of five years, and the net income derived from the use of such property is irrevocably dedicated to any of the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-110, 39-3-112, or 39-3-113 and to the purpose of maintaining and operating such organization. As used in this section, the term "net income" means all items of revenue and gain minus all items of loss and expense, including amounts reasonably anticipated for future needs, as determined according to the usual method of accounting for such organization. No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1473, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1712, § 5, effective June 9. L. 2018: Entire section amended, (HB 18-1375), ch. 274, p. 1725, § 93, effective May 29.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Statutory presumption of use for charitable purpose relieves fraternal organization only of its burden to establish such use; however, once the finding of charitable purpose is made, such organization has the burden of showing the irrevocable dedication of the net income of such property to the enumerated statutory uses and purpose set out in this section. Western Slavonic Ass'n v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 835 P.2d 621 (Colo. App. 1992).

39-3-111.5. Property - health-care services - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:
    1. Such property is owned by a nonprofit corporation, whether organized under the laws of this state or of another state;
    2. Such property is occupied or used by one or more physician or dentist, or both, licensed to practice medicine or dentistry, as applicable, under the laws of this state for the purpose of the practice of medicine or dentistry;
    3. Such health-care services are provided to patients who request such services and the financially needy are only charged for such services based upon the ability to pay; and
    4. The board of county commissioners of the county in which such property is located certifies that a need exists for the provision of such health-care services.
  2. The limitations set forth in section 39-3-116 (1) and (2) shall not apply to the use of property pursuant to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section.
  3. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 91: Entire section added, p. 1956, § 3, effective June 7.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-111.5 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(g)(I)(D) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Exempt status unaffected by receipt of money from beneficiaries. An institution does not lose its charitable character if it receives revenue from recipients of its bounty sufficient to keep it in operation and further its charitable purposes. Bishop & Chapter of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of City & County of Denver, 37 Colo. 378 , 86 P. 1021 (1906); Horton v. Colo. Springs Masonic Bldg. Soc'y, 64 Colo. 529 , 173 P. 61 (1918); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. San Luis Valley Masonic Ass'n, 80 Colo. 183 , 250 P. 147 (1926); Am. Water Works Ass'n v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 38 Colo. App. 341, 563 P.2d 359 (1976).

Where patients asked to pay for actual necessities furnished by home for consumptives, according to their circumstances and the accommodations they receive, and where such compensation does not exceed what is required for maintenance of the institution, it does not render it less a charity. Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of City & County of Denver, 37 Colo. 378, 86 P. 1021 (1906).

39-3-112. Definitions - residential property - orphanage - low-income elderly or individuals with disabilities - homeless or abused - low-income households - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Area median income" means the median income of the county in which the property is located in relation to family size, as published annually by the United States department of housing and urban development.
    2. "Disabled" means that an individual is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted for a continuous period of not less than twelve months.
    3. "Elderly or disabled low-income residential facility" means a facility, a portion of which is operated as a residential facility for elderly individuals or individuals with disabilities who meet the requirements of sub-subparagraph (A) of subparagraph (II) of paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section, which portion houses only such persons, exclusive of necessary housing facilities for resident managerial personnel, and the rest of which is operated as a health-care facility which is licensed by the state of Colorado.
    4. "Family service facility" means a facility which is operated as a residential facility for single-parent families, which houses only such families, exclusive of necessary housing facilities for resident managerial personnel, which provides, in addition to housing, counseling in such areas as career development, parenting skills, and financial budgeting, and which is a child care center licensed pursuant to the provisions of section 26-6-104, C.R.S.
    5. "Low-income household" means an individual or family whose total income is no greater than thirty percent of the area median income.
    6. "Low-income household residential facility" means a facility:
      1. That is operated as a residential facility for low-income households;
      2. For which the published rent schedule includes rents that a low-income household can afford by expending no more than thirty percent of the low-income household's total income for rent and utilities; and
      3. For which the owner of the facility has shown that the rent for the facility for which the exemption authorized in subsection (2) of this section applies is lower than the rent for a comparable facility for which said exemption does not apply by an amount equal to at least the value of said exemption.
    7. "Transitional housing facility" means a facility that:
      1. Is operated as a residential facility for single individuals or families, or both, who are homeless, who have resided within the past six months in a shelter for the homeless, or who have been abused, and whose incomes are as specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of subparagraph (II) of paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section;
      2. Has as its purpose to facilitate the achievement of independent living by such individuals and families within a twenty-four-month period; and
      3. Provides counseling in such areas as career development, parenting skills, and financial budgeting, whether at such facility or at another location.
  2. Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is residential and is occupied, owned, and operated in accordance with the requirements set forth in subsection (3) of this section.
  3. In order for property to be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the administrator must find, pursuant to section 39-2-117, that:
    1. The residential structure is:
      1. Occupied as an orphanage; or
      2. Occupied by:
        1. Single individuals who are sixty-two years of age or older or who are disabled, or a family, the head of which, or whose spouse, is sixty-two years of age or older or is disabled, and whose incomes are within one hundred fifty percent of the limits prescribed for similar individuals or families who occupy low-rent public housing operated by a city or county housing authority which is nearest in distance to such structure; or
        2. Single-parent families whose incomes are as specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (II) and who occupy a family service facility which is owned and operated by an organization which is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to the provisions of section 501 (c)(3) of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended; or
        3. Single individuals or families who occupy a transitional housing facility which is owned and operated by an organization which is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to the provisions of section 501 (c)(3) of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended; or
        4. Low-income households who occupy a low-income household residential facility.
    2. The residential structure is efficiently operated. Efficient operation is determined by the following factors:
      1. That the costs of operation, including salaries, are reasonable based upon the services and facilities provided and as compared with the costs of operation of any comparable public institution;
      2. That such operations do not materially enhance, directly or indirectly, the private gain of any individual except as reasonable compensation for services rendered or goods furnished;
      3. That the property on which the exemption is claimed does not exceed the amount of property reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the exempt purpose; and
      4. That the owners and operators of the residential structure have no occupancy requirement that discriminates upon the basis of race, creed, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, or ancestry; however, if the owner or sponsoring organization is a religious denomination, said owners or operators may give preference to members of that denomination.
    3. The property is owned:
      1. By a nonprofit corporation of which:
        1. No part of the net earnings of such corporation inures to the benefit of any private shareholder; and
        2. Property owned by such corporation is irrevocably dedicated to charitable, religious, or hospital purposes and no portion of its assets will inure to the benefit of any private person upon the liquidation, dissolution, or abandonment of such corporation; or
        1. With respect to residential structures specified in sub-subparagraphs (A), (C), and (D) of subparagraph (II) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3), during any compliance period, as defined by section 42 (i)(1) of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, by any domestic or foreign limited partnership of which any nonprofit corporation that satisfies the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (c) is a general partner and that was formed for the purpose of obtaining, and has been allocated, low-income housing credits pursuant to section 42 of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended.
        2. For property tax years commencing prior to January 1, 2019, this subsection (3)(c)(II) shall not apply if, during such compliance period, such domestic or foreign limited partnership which owns the residential structure distributes income or has income available for distribution to its partners or if the residential structure is sold or otherwise disposed of during such compliance period. If the administrator determines that, as specified in this subsection (3)(c)(II)(B), income has been distributed or has been available for distribution or the residential property has been sold or otherwise disposed of, the administrator shall revoke the property tax exemption for the residential property and property taxes shall be levied and collected against the residential property which would have otherwise been levied and collected from the date on which the exemption was initially granted plus all delinquent interest as provided for by law.

          (B.5) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2019, this subsection (3)(c)(II) shall not apply if, during such compliance period, such domestic or foreign limited partnership which owns the residential structure distributes income or has income available for distribution to its partners or if the residential structure is sold or otherwise disposed of during such compliance period. If the administrator determines that, as specified in this subsection (3)(c)(II)(B.5), income has been distributed or has been available for distribution or the residential property has been sold or otherwise disposed of, the administrator shall either revoke the property tax exemption for the residential property as of the date income becomes available for distribution or terminate the exemption as of the date the property is transferred.

        3. The provisions of this subparagraph (II) shall apply to applications for exemption made pursuant to section 39-2-117 which are filed on and after January 1, 1991, or which are pending on said date; or
        1. With respect to residential structures specified in sub-subparagraphs (A), (C), and (D) of subparagraph (II) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3), by any domestic or foreign limited partnership of which all of the general and limited partners are nonprofit corporations that satisfy the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (c).
        2. The provisions of this subparagraph (III) shall apply to applications for exemption made pursuant to section 39-2-117 which are filed on or after January 1, 1993, or which are pending on said date; or
        1. With respect to elderly or disabled low-income residential facilities or low-income household residential facilities, during any compliance period, as defined by section 42 (i)(1) of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, by any domestic or foreign limited partnership so long as each of the general partners of such limited partnership is a for-profit corporation, seventy-five percent or more of the outstanding voting stock of which is owned by, and seventy-five percent or more of the members of the board of directors of which is elected by, one or more nonprofit corporations that satisfy the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (c) and so long as such limited partnership was formed for the purpose of obtaining, and the structure that is owned by such limited partnership has been allocated, low-income housing credits pursuant to section 42 of the "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended.
        2. The provisions of this subparagraph (IV) shall not apply if, during any compliance period: Any of the general partners of the domestic or foreign limited partnership which owns the residential structure specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (IV) cease to meet the requirements specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (IV); the domestic or foreign limited partnership which owns such residential structure distributes cash or other property to its partners; or such residential structure is sold or otherwise disposed of.
        3. Upon a determination by the administrator that any of the events specified in sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (IV) have occurred, the administrator shall revoke the property tax exemption for the residential facility specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (IV), and property taxes shall be levied and collected against such residential facility in the amount which would have otherwise been levied and collected from the date on which such exemption was initially granted, and all delinquent interest provided by law shall apply to such taxes.
        4. The provisions of this subparagraph (IV) shall apply to applications for exemption made pursuant to section 39-2-117 which are filed on or after January 1, 1993, or which are pending on such date.
  4. In the event the occupants of the residential structure include both persons who are qualified pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of this section and persons who are not qualified, the portion of such residential structure that is utilized by qualified occupants shall be deemed to be property used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit, and such portion, but only such portion, shall be exempt pursuant to the provisions of subsection (2) of this section. The determination as to what portion of such structure is so utilized shall be made by the administrator on the basis of the facts existing on the annual assessment date for such property, and the administrator shall have the authority to determine a ratio which reflects the value of the nonexempt portion of such structure in relation to the total value of the whole structure and the land upon which such structure is located and which is identical to the ratio of the number of residential units occupied by nonqualified occupants to the total number of occupied residential units in such structure.

    (4.5) No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption.

  5. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.
  6. For purposes of processing applications received for the exemption authorized by subsection (2) of this section for low-income household residential facilities, the department of local affairs shall contract with an independent contractor for the performance of the application processing services in accordance with section 24-50-504, C.R.S. Said contract shall be limited to a term of one year and shall commence when the exemption for low-income household residential facilities first becomes available.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1473, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: (4.5) added, p. 1713, § 6, effective June 9. L. 91: (1)(c) added and (3)(a) and (3)(c) amended, p. 1957, §§ 4, 5, effective June 7. L. 92: (3)(c)(II)(B) amended, p. 2223, § 3, effective April 9. L. 93: (1)(a.5), (3)(c)(III), and (3)(c)(IV) added and (3)(c)(II)(C) amended, p. 432, §§ 1, 2, effective April 19. L. 95: (1)(c), (3)(c)(II)(A), and (3)(c)(III)(A) amended, p. 1391, § 1, effective June 5. L. 2001: (1)(a), (3)(c)(II)(A), (3)(c)(III)(A), and (3)(c)(IV)(A) amended and (1)(a.3), (1)(b.3), (1)(b.5), (3)(a)(II)(D), and (6) added, pp. 1520, 1521, §§ 1, 2, 3, effective August 8. L. 2008: (3)(b)(IV) amended, p. 1604, § 34, effective May 29. L. 2014: (1)(a.5) amended, (SB 14-118), ch. 250, p. 986, § 24, effective August 6. L. 2019: IP(3) and (3)(c)(II)(B) amended and (3)(c)(II)(B.5) added, (HB 19-1319), ch. 200, p. 2164, § 4, effective September 1. L. 2021: IP(3) and (3)(b)(IV) amended, (HB 21-1108), ch. 156, p. 897, § 45, effective September 7.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

Cross references: (1) For the legislative declaration contained in the 2008 act amending subsection (3)(b)(IV), see section 1 of chapter 341, Session Laws of Colorado 2008.

(2) For the legislative declaration in HB 19-1319, see section 1 of chapter 200, Session Laws of Colorado 2019.

(3) For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1108, see section 1 of chapter 156, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

ANNOTATION

For when home for aged deemed charitable, see Stanbro v. Baptist Home Ass'n of Colo. for Aged, 172 Colo. 572 , 475 P.2d 23 (1970) (decided under former § 39-3-101 (1)(g)).

Subsection (4) is inapplicable in determining whether transitional housing facilities qualify for an exemption if unoccupied on January 1. Family Tree Found. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 119 P.3d 581 (Colo. App. 2005).

39-3-112.5. Residential property - homeless - charitable purposes - exempt - limitations.

  1. Property, real and personal, which is used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is residential, is owned by the United States, and is leased by a department or agency of the United States to any nonprofit organization, whether organized under the laws of this state or of another state, for the purpose of housing single individuals or families, or both, who are homeless.
  2. Any exemption shall be allowed pursuant to subsection (1) of this section only upon the delivery to the administrator of a copy of such lease between the agency of the United States and the nonprofit organization and a copy of the rental agreement between the nonprofit organization and the individuals or families to be housed in such property. Such exemption shall be allowed only for the period of time that such residential property is actually used for said purpose, and such nonprofit organization shall immediately notify the administrator when the use of such residential property has changed.
  3. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 91: Entire section added, p. 1959, § 6, effective June 7.

39-3-113. Residential property - while being constructed - charitable purposes - exemption - limitations.

Property, real and personal, which is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such property is residential and consists of land and one or more structures which are in the process of being constructed if such property is irrevocably committed to residential use in accordance with the requirements set forth in section 39-3-109 (1) or 39-3-112 (2) and (3). The exemption provided by this section shall terminate on the assessment date subsequent to the issuance of a permit or other authority to occupy such structure or structures. Thereafter, such property shall be subject to the provisions of sections 39-3-109 and 39-3-112. No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which otherwise is exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall benefit people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1475, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1713, § 7, effective June 9.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-113 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Prospective site of building not exempt. Under this section and § 5 of art. X, Colo. Const., property held with the intention of erecting thereon at some future time buildings for purely charitable purposes is not exempt from taxation. City & County of Denver v. George Washington Lodge Ass'n, 121 Colo. 470 , 217 P.2d 617 (1950).

Requiring ownership as well as use deemed within constitutional authorization. In requiring ownership, as well as use for strictly charitable purposes, the general assembly acted within its power, under § 5, art. X, Colo. Const., to vary, by general law, such exemptions created by the constitution. First Nat'l Bank v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 189 Colo. 128 , 538 P.2d 427 (1975).

When there is neither a present charitable use nor the vestige of a building in which such use might be carried on, there is no possible basis for exemption. Grace Calvary Church v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 290 , 274 P.2d 983 (1954).

Where unfinished building deemed within exemption. The fact that a building remains in an unfinished state, due to inability to obtain funds to complete it, does not destroy the property's tax exempt status, because of the uses, wholly consistent with the operation of a hospital, to which it is being put pending its completion. City & County of Denver v. Spears Free Clinic Hosp. for Poor Children, 142 Colo. 347 , 350 P.2d 1057 (1960).

39-3-113.5. Property acquired by nonprofit housing provider for low-income housing - use for charitable purposes - exemption - limitations - definitions.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Area median income" means the median income of any county in which property is located in relation to family size, as published annually by the United States department of housing and urban development.
    2. "Indicators of intent" means off-site activities of a nonprofit housing provider that establish the provider's specific intent to:
      1. Use property for the purpose of constructing or rehabilitating housing to be sold to low-income applicants; or
      2. Sell the property to low-income applicants for the purpose of constructing or rehabilitating housing for the low-income applicants.
    3. "Low-income applicant" means an individual or family whose total income is no greater than eighty percent of the area median income and who applies to a nonprofit housing provider to assist in the construction and purchase of housing to be constructed by the provider.
    4. "Nonprofit housing provider" means an organization that is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to section 501 (c)(3) of the federal "Internal Revenue Code of 1986", as amended, and that has a primary organizational mission of:
      1. Working with low-income applicants to construct or rehabilitate housing that the organization then sells to the low-income applicants for their residential use; or
      2. Selling property to low-income applicants and then working with the low-income applicants to construct or rehabilitate housing for their residential use.
  2. Subject to the limitations specified in subsection (3) of this section, for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2011, real property acquired by a nonprofit housing provider upon which the provider intends to construct or rehabilitate housing to be sold to low-income applicants or which the provider intends to sell to low-income applicants for the purpose of constructing or rehabilitating housing for their residential use is deemed to be being used for strictly charitable purposes, regardless of whether or not there is actual physical use of the property, and shall be exempt from property taxation in accordance with section 5 of article X of the state constitution. In the case of property sold by a nonprofit housing provider to a low-income applicant, the property tax exemption pursuant to this subsection (2) shall be allowed until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the housing; except that the property tax exemption shall not be allowed for longer than one year after the nonprofit housing provider sells the property to the low-income applicant. In determining whether a nonprofit housing provider satisfies the intent requirement of this subsection (2) with respect to particular property, the administrator may consider indicators of intent, including but not limited to:
    1. The establishment by the nonprofit housing provider of a committee or other structure for the purpose of planning the construction or rehabilitation of housing on the property;
    2. Steps taken by the nonprofit housing provider to obtain any required local government approvals for the construction or rehabilitation of housing on the property;
    3. Steps taken by the nonprofit housing provider to develop and implement a financing plan for the construction or rehabilitation of housing on the property;
    4. The hiring of architects, contractors, or other professionals by the nonprofit housing provider in preparation for the actual construction or rehabilitation of housing on the property; and
    5. The solicitation or acceptance by the nonprofit housing provider of applications from low-income applicants for housing to be constructed or rehabilitated on the property.
  3. The property tax exemption allowed to a nonprofit housing provider by subsection (2) of this section is subject to the following limitations:
    1. The exemption may be allowed for a maximum of five consecutive property tax years, beginning with the property tax year in which the nonprofit housing provider obtained title to the property; and
    2. If the nonprofit housing provider is allowed an exemption for any property tax year and subsequently sells, donates, or leases the property to any person other than a low-income applicant who assisted or will assist in the construction of housing for the applicant's residential use on the property, the provider shall be liable for all property taxes that the provider did not previously pay due to the exemption.

Source: L. 2011: Entire section added, (HB 11-1241), ch. 248, p. 1082, § 1, effective August 10. L. 2013: (1)(b), (1)(c), (1)(d), IP(2), and (3)(b) amended, (HB 13-1246), ch. 203, p. 845, § 1, effective August 7.

39-3-114. Burden - claim for charitable exemption.

The burden shall be on the owner and operator of any residential property for which an exemption is claimed pursuant to any of the provisions of sections 39-3-109 and 39-3-112 to show facts sufficient to support the exemption claimed. In determining whether or not a particular property is entitled to such an exemption provided for in any of said sections, the administrator may require the owner or operator of such property to annually submit a complete financial report on its operations and may require any occupants whose residential units are claimed to qualify for such exemption to submit copies of their federal or state income tax returns.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1475, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2009: Entire section amended, (SB 09-042), ch. 176, p. 781, § 4, effective August 5.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Subsection (1)(g) not violative of equal protection. There can be no doubt that the general assembly intended to treat property owned and used by a charity differently than property merely used by a charity. Since within these classes all persons or entities are treated similarly, there is no violation of equal protection under the fourteenth amendment. First Nat'l Bank v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 189 Colo. 128 , 538 P.2d 427 (1975) (decided under former law).

39-3-114.5. Charitable exemption - owner claiming federal tax credit - fee in lieu of school district tax. (Repealed)

Source: L. 2009: Entire section added, (SB 09-042), ch. 176, p. 780, § 3, effective August 5. L. 2014: Entire section repealed, (HB 14-1349), ch. 230, p. 855, § 5, effective May 17.

39-3-115. Statutes not applicable.

Nothing in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-114 shall apply to parts 2 and 5 of article 4 of title 29, C.R.S.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23.

39-3-116. Combination use of property - charitable, religious, and educational purposes - exemption - limitations.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, property, real and personal, which is owned and used by the owner thereof or by any other person or organization solely and exclusively for any combination of the purposes specified in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, subject to the limitations and requirements in said sections, including but not limited to the requirement that property not be owned or used for private or corporate gain or profit, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. No requirement shall be imposed that use of property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to any of said sections shall benefit the people of Colorado in order to qualify for said exemption. Property which is otherwise exempt pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be subject to the provisions of section 39-3-129 relating to the proportional valuation of exempt property if such property is partially leased, loaned, or otherwise made available for a portion of any calendar year to any business conducted for profit.
  2. In the event that such property is used by any person or organization other than the owner:
    1. The use of the property by the owner, if any, must qualify pursuant to the provisions of this section or pursuant to any of the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5, and, in addition, the owner must qualify for an exemption pursuant to the provisions of section 39-2-117;
    2. The use of the property by the person or organization other than the owner is a use described in the provisions of this section or in any of the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 or such person or organization is otherwise exempt from the payment of property taxes; and
    3. The amount received by the owner for the use of such property specified in sections 39-3-107 to 39-3-113.5, other than from any shareholder or member of the owner or from any person or organization controlled by an organization which also controls such shareholder or member, must not exceed one dollar per year plus an equitable portion of the reasonable expenses incurred in the operation and maintenance of the property so used. For purposes of this paragraph (c), reasonable expenses include interest expenses, depreciation, long-term maintenance expenses allowed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, capital expenses dedicated to refurbishing the property, and expenses incurred to allow the property to conserve energy, water, or other natural resources, but do not include any amount expended to reduce debt.
  3. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23; (2)(c) amended, p. 1486, § 3, effective June 7. L. 90: (1) amended, p. 1713, § 8, effective June 9. L. 2013: (1) and (2) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1704, § 120, effective August 7. L. 2014: (2)(c) amended, (HB 14-1074), ch. 26, p. 166, § 1, effective March 14.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(g.1) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-116 is similar to § 39-3-101 (1)(g.1) as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Rule of strict construction not followed in all cases. While tax exemptions are normally subject to strict construction and limitation, this rule of strict construction is not applied with full vigor to charitable, religious, and educational exemptions. Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of Arapahoe County, 29 Colo. 143 , 68 P. 272 (1901); Colo. Sem. v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 30 Colo. 507 , 71 P. 410 (1903); Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of City and County of Denver, 37 Colo. 378 , 86 P. 1021 (1906); Pitcher v. Miss Wolcott Sch. Ass'n, 63 Colo. 294 , 165 P. 608 (1917); Horton v. Colo. Springs Masonic Bldg. Soc'y, 64 Colo. 529 , 173 P. 61 (1918); Bd. of Comm'rs v. San Luis Valley Masonic Ass'n, 80 Colo. 183 , 250 P. 147 (1926); Denver Turnverein v. McGlone, 91 Colo. 473 , 15 P.2d 709 (1932); Kemp v. Pillar of Fire, 94 Colo. 41 , 27 P.2d 1036 (1933); General Conference of Church of God--7th Day v. Carper, 192 Colo. 178 , 557 P.2d 832 (1976).

Each case must be resolved on its own facts. While tax exemption statutes are generally strictly construed, each case must be resolved on the basis of its own facts, considering all its facts and circumstances and the intentions and purposes of those in charge of the institution to which the property belongs, respecting the use and occupation of such property. Bishop & Chapter of Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist v. Treasurer of City & County of Denver, 37 Colo. 378 , 86 P. 1021 (1906); United Presbyterian Ass'n v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 167 Colo. 485 , 448 P.2d 967 (1968); Am. Water Works Ass'n v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 38 Colo. App. 341, 563 P.2d 359 (1976).

General assembly has power to abolish tax exemptions granted. It is within the power of the general assembly to abolish tax exemptions granted to religious, charitable, and educational institutions. McGlone v. First Baptist Church, 97 Colo. 427 , 50 P.2d 547 (1935).

39-3-117. Cemeteries - not-for-profit - exemption.

Cemeteries not used or held for private or corporate profit shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(h) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-118. Intangible personal property - exemption.

Intangible personal property shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. For purposes of this section, "intangible personal property" shall include, but is not limited to, computer software.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1715, § 2, effective May 2.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(i) as it existed prior to 1989.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 1990 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 281, Session Laws of Colorado 1990.

ANNOTATION

Exemption does not apply to a public utility, which is assessed under the valuation method established in part 4 of this article. Qwest v. Colo. Div. of Prop. Taxation, 2013 CO 39, 304 P.3d 217.

39-3-118.5. Business personal property - exemption - exemption authority for local governments.

  1. For property tax years commencing on and after January 1, 1996, business personal property shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax until such business personal property is first used in the business after acquisition.
  2. For the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2021, any county, municipality, or special district may exempt from its levy and collection of property tax up to one hundred percent of any business personal property.

Source: L. 95: Entire section added, p. 1213, § 1, effective May 31. L. 2021: Entire section amended, (SB 21-130), ch. 75, p. 299, § 2, effective April 29.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 21-130, see section 1 of chapter 75, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

39-3-118.7. Community solar garden - partial business personal property tax exemption - definitions.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Community solar garden" has the same meaning as set forth in section 40-2-127 (2)(b)(I)(A), C.R.S.
    2. "Subscriber" has the same meaning as set forth in section 40-2-127 (2)(b)(II), C.R.S.
  2. For property tax years commencing on and after January 1, 2015, but before January 1, 2021, there is exempt from the levy and collection of property tax the percentage of alternating current electricity capacity of a community solar garden that is attributed to residential or governmental subscribers, or to subscribers that are organizations that have been granted property tax exemptions pursuant to sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5.

Source: L. 2014: Entire section added, (HB 14-1101), ch. 172, p. 627, § 1, effective August 6.

39-3-119. Inventories - materials and supplies - held for consumption or primarily for sale - exemption.

Inventories of merchandise and materials and supplies that are held for consumption by any business or are held primarily for sale shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. The property tax administrator shall publish in the manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions prepared and published pursuant to section 39-2-109 (1)(e) a definition or description of the types of personal property that are "held for consumption by any business" and therefore exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to this section.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2000: Entire section amended, p. 750, § 2, effective May 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(k) as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Television signal boxes and filters owned by a television service provider and leased to customers are exempt property. The property tax administrator's published guidelines for the consumable personal property tax exemption allow for personal property to be exempt from taxation if the acquisition cost of the property is $250 or less. Because the value of each box and filter, or each combination of one box and one filter, was less than $250 and the boxes and filters were produced by different manufacturers and recorded as separate assets by the television service provider, the boxes and filters are considered individual items worth less than $250 rather than components of a larger system worth more than $250. EchoStar Satellite, L.L.C. v. Arapahoe County Bd. of Equaliz., 171 P.3d 633 (Colo. App. 2007).

39-3-119.5. Personal property - exemption - reimbursement to local governments - legislative declaration - definitions.

  1. For property tax years commencing on and after January 1, 1997, personal property not otherwise exempt from property tax shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if the personal property would otherwise be listed on a single personal property schedule and the actual value of such personal property is less than or equal to the amount set forth in subsection (2) of this section.
    1. The exemption created in subsection (1) of this section shall be up to and including the following amounts:
      1. Two thousand five hundred dollars for property tax years commencing prior to January 1, 2009;
      2. Four thousand dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2010;
      3. Five thousand five hundred dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2012;
      4. Seven thousand dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014;
      5. Seven thousand three hundred dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2016;
      6. Seven thousand four hundred dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018;
      7. Seven thousand seven hundred dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2020; and
      8. Fifty thousand dollars for property tax years commencing on January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2022.
        1. Beginning with the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2023, the amount of the exemption created in subsection (1) of this section shall be adjusted biennially to account for inflation since the amount of the exemption last changed pursuant to this subsection (2). On or before November 1, 2022, and each even-numbered year thereafter, the administrator shall calculate the amount of the exemption for the next two-year cycle using inflation for the prior two calendar years as of the date of the calculation. The adjusted exemption shall be rounded upward to the nearest one hundred dollar increment. The administrator shall certify the amount of the exemption for the next two-year cycle and publish the amount on the website maintained by the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs. (b) (I) (A) Beginning with the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2023, the amount of the exemption created in subsection (1) of this section shall be adjusted biennially to account for inflation since the amount of the exemption last changed pursuant to this subsection (2). On or before November 1, 2022, and each even-numbered year thereafter, the administrator shall calculate the amount of the exemption for the next two-year cycle using inflation for the prior two calendar years as of the date of the calculation. The adjusted exemption shall be rounded upward to the nearest one hundred dollar increment. The administrator shall certify the amount of the exemption for the next two-year cycle and publish the amount on the website maintained by the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs.
        2. When calculating the exemption amount under subsection (2)(b)(I)(A) of this section, the administrator shall do another calculation in the same manner but starting from seven thousand nine hundred dollars instead of fifty thousand dollars. This amount is the alternative exemption amount.
        3. If, under subsection (3)(f) of this section, the state treasurer notifies the administrator that not all counties have received reimbursement warrants for lost property tax revenue for the amounts specified in subsection (3)(d) of this section, then beginning with the property tax year commencing on January 1 that follows the notification, and for all property tax years thereafter, the amount of the exemption in subsection (1) of this section is the alternative exemption amount. Thereafter, the alternative exemption is adjusted biennially to account for inflation in the same manner as set forth in subsection (2)(b)(I)(A) of this section, and the administrator shall certify the amount of the exemption for the next two-year cycle and publish the amount on the website maintained by the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs.
      1. As used in subsection (2)(b)(I) of this section, "inflation" means the annual percentage change in the United States department of labor, bureau of labor statistics, consumer price index for Denver-Aurora-Lakewood for all items and all urban consumers, or its applicable predecessor or successor index.
      1. For the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2021, each assessor shall calculate the aggregate value of exempt business personal property within the county based on the property that is listed on schedules for the property tax year with a total value that is more than seven thousand nine hundred dollars and less than or equal to fifty thousand dollars. (3) (a) (I) For the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2021, each assessor shall calculate the aggregate value of exempt business personal property within the county based on the property that is listed on schedules for the property tax year with a total value that is more than seven thousand nine hundred dollars and less than or equal to fifty thousand dollars.
      2. For the property tax year commencing on January 1, 2021, each treasurer shall calculate the total property tax revenues lost by all local governmental entities within the treasurer's county based on the exempt business personal property amount calculated in accordance with subsection (3)(a)(I) of this section.
    1. No later than February 1, 2022, and each February 1 thereafter, the administrator shall calculate the percentage increase or decrease in total valuation of business personal property in the state over the prior two property tax years. The administrator shall publish the percentage increase or decrease on the website maintained by the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs.
      1. For the property tax years commencing on January 1, 2022, and each year thereafter, each assessor shall calculate an estimate of the aggregate value of exempt business personal property for the county and each local governmental entity located within the county that is equal to the applicable baseline exemption total adjusted by the growth factor for each property tax year commencing on and after January 1, 2022.
      2. For the property tax years commencing on January 1, 2022, and each year thereafter, each treasurer shall calculate the total property tax revenues lost by all local governmental entities within the treasurer's county based on the estimate of exempt business personal property amount calculated in accordance with subsection (3)(c)(I) of this section.
      3. As used in this subsection (3)(c), unless the context otherwise requires:
        1. "Baseline exemption total" means the aggregate value of the exempt business personal property calculated in accordance with subsection (3)(a)(I) of this section for a county or a local governmental entity located within the county as of January 1, 2021.
        2. "Growth factor" means the percentage increase or decrease that the administrator publishes for a property tax year in accordance with subsection (3)(b) of this section.
    2. No later than March 1, 2022, and each March 1 thereafter, each treasurer shall report the amount specified in subsection (3)(a)(II) or (3)(c)(II) of this section, as applicable, and the basis for the amount to the administrator, and the administrator may require a treasurer to provide additional information as necessary to evaluate the amount reported. The administrator shall confirm that the reported amount is correct or rectify the amount, if necessary. The administrator shall then forward the correct amount for each county to the state treasurer to enable the state treasurer to issue a reimbursement warrant to each treasurer in accordance with subsection (3)(e) of this section.
    3. No later than April 15, 2022, and April 15 of each year thereafter, the state treasurer shall issue a warrant to be paid upon demand from the general fund to each treasurer that is equal to the amount specified by the administrator for the county under subsection (3)(d) of this section. Each treasurer shall distribute the total amount received from the state treasurer to the local governmental entities within the treasurer's county as if the revenues had been regularly paid as property tax. When distributing the money, the treasurer shall provide each local governmental entity with a statement of the amount distributed to the local governmental entity that represents the reimbursement received under this subsection (3)(e).
    4. No later than May 1, 2022, and May 1 of each year thereafter, the state treasurer shall notify the administrator whether all counties have received a reimbursement warrant for lost property tax revenue for the amounts specified in subsection (3)(d) of this section.
    5. This subsection (3) does not apply if the amount of the exemption created in subsection (1) of this section is the alternative exemption amount as required by subsection (2)(b)(I)(C) of this section.

Source: L. 96: Entire section added, p. 1847, § 1, effective August 7. L. 2008: Entire section amended, p. 947, § 1, effective August 5. L. 2018: (2)(b)(II) amended, (HB 18-1375), ch. 274, p. 1722, § 79, effective May 29. L. 2021: (2)(a)(III) and (2)(b)(I) amended and (2)(a)(V), (2)(a)(VI), (2)(a)(VII), (2)(a)(VIII), and (3) added, (HB 21-1312), ch. 299, p. 1792, § 6, effective July 1.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1312, see section 1 of chapter 75, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.

ANNOTATION

Under both the plain language and the legislative history of this section, the statutory $2,500 exemption threshold must be applied on a "per schedule" basis and not on a "per business location" basis. SecurityLink from Ameritech, Inc. v. City & County of Denver, 32 P.3d 499 (Colo. App. 2000).

Where personal property situated in multiple locations throughout the county was listed on a single personal property schedule and the total valuation of all the property listed on the schedule exceeded the $2,500 exemption threshold, neither the language of the statute nor the legislative history supports the view that the general assembly intended to exempt such property from taxation under these circumstances. SecurityLink from Ameritech, Inc. v. City & County of Denver, 32 P.3d 499 (Colo. App. 2000).

The plain language of this section does not contemplate an exemption where property located at multiple locations was encompassed in a single schedule and the total property value per schedule far exceeded $2,500. TCI Satellite Entm't, Inc. v. Bd. of Equaliz., 9 P.3d 1179 (Colo. App. 2000), aff'd, 31 P.3d 155 ( Colo. 2001 ).

This section merely exempts a taxpayer's otherwise non-exempt personal property in a particular county if the aggregate value of such property does not exceed $2,500. Huddleston v. Bd. of Equaliz., 31 P.3d 155 (Colo. 2001).

This exemption allowed by this section must be applied on a per-schedule basis and this section contemplates that all listings of personal property owned by a single taxpayer in a single county will be treated as a single schedule. Huddleston v. Montezuma County Bd. of Equaliz., 31 P.3d 155 (Colo. 2001).

39-3-120. Livestock - exemption.

Livestock shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1476, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(l) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-121. Agricultural and livestock products - exemption.

Agricultural and livestock products shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1477, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(m) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-122. Agricultural equipment used in production of agricultural products - exemption.

Agricultural equipment which is used on any farm or ranch in the production of agricultural products shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1477, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(n) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-123. Works of art, literary materials, and artifacts - on loan - exemption - limitations - definitions.

  1. Works of art, literary materials, and artifacts shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if such works of art, literary materials, and artifacts are loaned to and are in the custody and control of:
    1. The state or a political subdivision thereof; or
    2. A library or any art gallery or museum which is owned or operated by a charitable organization whose property is irrevocably dedicated to charitable purposes and whose assets shall not inure to the benefit of any private person upon the liquidation, dissolution, or abandonment by the owner, and which uses such works of art, literary materials, and artifacts for charitable purposes. This exemption shall apply only for the period of time during which such works of art, literary materials, and artifacts are actually on loan and shall be in addition to such exemptions provided for in sections 39-3-108 to 39-3-113.5.
  2. Any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall comply with the provisions of section 39-5-113.5.
  3. For purposes of subsection (1) of this section:
    1. "Artifacts" means items of personal property which are objects of human workmanship and which have archaeological or historical significance.
    2. "Charitable organization" means a charitable organization as defined in section 39-26-102 (2.5).
    3. "Charitable purposes" means public display, research, educational study, maintenance of property, and preparation for display.
    4. "Literary materials" means items of personal property including, but not limited to, books, letters, diaries, records, documents, memoranda, journals, magazines, and notes.
    5. "Works of art" means works of art as defined in section 39-1-102 (18).

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1477, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2013: (1)(b) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1704, § 121, effective August 7.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(o) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-124. Property used by state entity - installment sales or lease agreement - financed purchase of an asset, certificate of participation, or leveraged lease agreement - exemption.

    1. Property, real and personal, that is used by the state or any of its political subdivisions pursuant to the provisions of any installment sales agreement, financed purchase of an asset agreement, certificate of participation agreement, or any other agreement whereby the state or such political subdivision shall be entitled to acquire title to such property at the end of the agreement term without cost or for only nominal consideration shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax.
        1. Subject to the provisions of sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (I), on and after January 1, 2009, the part of real property that is used by the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education pursuant to the provisions of any lease or rental agreement for at least a one-year term, with or without an option to purchase, and pursuant to which the subject real property is used for purposes of the state, political subdivision, or institution of higher education, as applicable, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. If the state or any political subdivision or state-supported institution of higher education enters into a lease or rental agreement or is already in a lease or rental agreement on or after January 1, 2009, and is exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to this section, the state, political subdivision, or state-supported institution of higher education, as applicable, shall file a copy of the lease or rental agreement with the county assessor's office. The state or a political subdivision or institution of higher education shall notify the county assessor's office in the event that the lease or rental agreement is terminated prior to the term stated in such lease or rental agreement. Nothing in this paragraph (b) shall affect property tax exemptions allowed pursuant to section 8-82-104, 22-32-127, 29-4-227, 30-11-104.2, 31-15-802, or 43-1-214, C.R.S. (b) (I) (A) Subject to the provisions of sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (I), on and after January 1, 2009, the part of real property that is used by the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education pursuant to the provisions of any lease or rental agreement for at least a one-year term, with or without an option to purchase, and pursuant to which the subject real property is used for purposes of the state, political subdivision, or institution of higher education, as applicable, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax. If the state or any political subdivision or state-supported institution of higher education enters into a lease or rental agreement or is already in a lease or rental agreement on or after January 1, 2009, and is exempt from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to this section, the state, political subdivision, or state-supported institution of higher education, as applicable, shall file a copy of the lease or rental agreement with the county assessor's office. The state or a political subdivision or institution of higher education shall notify the county assessor's office in the event that the lease or rental agreement is terminated prior to the term stated in such lease or rental agreement. Nothing in this paragraph (b) shall affect property tax exemptions allowed pursuant to section 8-82-104, 22-32-127, 29-4-227, 30-11-104.2, 31-15-802, or 43-1-214, C.R.S.
        2. The state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education shall reduce, deduct, or offset property taxes from rent due under any lease or rental agreement pursuant to sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (I). Upon receipt of a lease or rental agreement for the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education, the county assessor shall send a notice to the landlord acknowledging receipt of the lease or rental agreement. The notice shall identify the property, the property address, and the parties to the lease or rental agreement.
        3. To the extent that real property taxes are shared and payable by one or more tenants under the lease of property that are not the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education, real property taxes otherwise due but for the application of this paragraph (b) shall be deemed taxes paid by the property owner or the landlord of a property leased in part to the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education.
        4. Only a tenant that is the state, a political subdivision, or a state-supported institution of higher education shall receive any benefit related to the tenant's property tax-exempt status pursuant to this paragraph (b).
        5. It is the general assembly's intent that the application of this paragraph (b) be cost-neutral in that the tax reduction and the rent reduction pursuant to this paragraph (b) are equal.
      1. For purposes of this paragraph (b), "state-supported institution of higher education" includes, but need not be limited to, all postsecondary institutions in the state supported in whole or in part by state funds, including community colleges, extension programs of the state-supported universities and colleges, local district colleges, area technical colleges, and the institutions governed by the regents of the university of Colorado.
  1. A leasehold interest in real or personal property that is owned by the state or by a political subdivision of the state and that has been leased to a private person, the use and possession of which has been leased back to the state or a political subdivision of the state, shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax during the term of the use and possession of the property by the state or a political subdivision of the state. Property that is the subject of a leveraged leasing agreement executed by the state or by a political subdivision of the state shall be treated as tax-exempt property owned by the state for purposes of any state or local tax.
  2. The lease of property by a political subdivision of the state to a private person and the sublease of the property back to the political subdivision of the state pursuant to a leveraged leasing agreement shall not cause the private person to whom the property has been leased to incur any liability in tort by virtue of the private person's status as a lessor under the leveraged leasing agreement.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1477, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2003: Entire section amended, p. 1720, § 3, effective May 14. L. 2008: (1) amended, p. 1631, § 1, effective August 5. L. 2009: (1)(b)(I) amended, (HB 09-1365), ch. 320, p. 1710, § 1, effective June 1. L. 2016: (1)(b)(II) amended, (HB 16-1082), ch. 58, p. 153, § 43, effective August 10. L. 2021: (1)(a) amended, (HB 21-1316), ch. 325, p. 2062, § 77, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-101 (1)(p) as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-125. Church property - used as residence - exemption - limitation. (Repealed)

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1478, § 1, effective April 23; entire section repealed, p. 1492, § 9, effective June 7.

Editor's note: Before its repeal, this section was similar to former § 39-3-102 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-126. Horticultural improvements - exemption - limitation - exception.

Any increase in value of privately owned lands resulting from the planting of trees shall not be taken into account in determining the actual value of such lands for a period of thirty years from the date of planting such trees. This section shall apply to all lands so planted; however, in the event that any trees become sufficiently mature as to be of economic use and value prior to the expiration of thirty years, any increase in use and value shall be thereafter taken into account in determining the actual value of such lands.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1478, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-103 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-127. County fair property - exemption - limitation.

Property, real and personal, of any association duly organized pursuant to the laws of this state for the purpose of holding county fairs to promote and advance the interests of agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry, home economics, and the mechanical attributes thereof shall be exempt from the levy and collection of property tax so long as such property is actually and exclusively used for said purpose and not for pecuniary profit.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1478, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-104 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-127.5. Qualifying business entities - participation in federal tax credit transactions - exemption - requirements - definitions.

  1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Qualified business entity" means a limited partnership or a limited liability company:
      1. That is formed for the purpose of obtaining federal tax credits and that does obtain such credits; and
      2. The general partner or managing member of which is an entity that would qualify for property tax exemption under sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5.
  2. For property tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, real and personal property is exempt from the levy and collection of property tax if:
    1. The property tax is owed by a qualified business entity; and
    2. The property is used for the purposes described in sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 and 39-3-116.
  3. In addition to any other requirement specified in this section, any exemption claimed pursuant to the provisions of this section must also comply with section 39-2-117.

Source: L. 2014: Entire section added, (HB 14-1349), ch. 230, p. 853, § 1, effective May 17.

39-3-128. Exempt property listed and valued.

It is the duty of the assessor to list, appraise, and value all real property exempted from the levy and collection of property tax pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 or 39-3-116, and such information shall be entered in the same detail as required for taxable property.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1478, § 1, effective April 23; entire section amended, p. 1492, § 8, effective June 7. L. 2013: Entire section amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1705, § 122, effective August 7. L. 2016: Entire section amended, (SB 16-189), ch. 210, p. 792, § 106, effective June 6.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-105 as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-128 is similar to § 39-3-105 as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, a relevant case construing that provision has been included in the annotations to this section.

When taxpayer may institute declaratory action to test right to exemption. Where property has been exempted by law from taxation and where a municipality attempts to tax that property, the taxpayer may institute a declaratory action to test the right of his property to be exempted from such taxes. City & County of Denver v. Spears Free Clinic Hosp. for Poor Children, 142 Colo. 347 , 350 P.2d 1057 (1960).

Injunction may issue to prevent collection of taxes on exempt property. City & County of Denver v. Spears Free Clinic Hosp. for Poor Children, 142 Colo. 347 , 350 P.2d 1057 (1960).

39-3-129. Proportional valuation - exempt property.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, whenever any real property that was previously taxable becomes legally exempt from the levy and collection of property tax or any real property that was previously legally exempt from the levy and collection of property tax becomes taxable, the valuation for assessment of the real property shall be a proportion of the valuation for assessment of the real property for the entire taxable year based upon the ratio of the portion of the taxable year in which the property is taxable to the entire taxable year. In the event the real property is partially leased, loaned, or otherwise made available to and used by a business conducted for profit, the determination as to what portion of the real property is so utilized shall be made by the administrator on the basis of the facts existing on the annual assessment date for the real property. The administrator shall have the authority to determine the actual value of the nonexempt portion of the property in relation to the actual value of the entire property by using the ratio of the square foot area of the property utilized by the business conducted for profit to the total square foot area of the property. Where shown to be more appropriate, in order to determine the relationship between the actual value of the nonexempt portion of the property and the actual value of the total property, the administrator may employ the ratio of the portion as measured in hours of any calendar year in which the property is leased, loaned, or otherwise made available to and used by any business conducted for profit to the entire calendar year.
  2. The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not be applicable to household furnishings.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1478, § 1, effective April 23. L. 96: (1) amended, p. 44, § 2, effective March 20; (1) amended, p. 1200, § 4, effective June 1.

Editor's note:

  1. This section is similar to former § 39-3-106 as it existed prior to 1989.
  2. Amendments to subsection (1) by Senate Bill 96-006 and House Bill 96-1113 were harmonized.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 1996 act amending subsection (1), see section 1 of chapter 16, Session Laws of Colorado 1996.

39-3-130. Change in tax status of property - effective date - tax liability.

      1. Whenever any real property that was previously taxable becomes legally exempt from the levy and collection of property tax for any reason, the person conveying the real property shall be relieved from all further tax obligations with respect to the real property on the date title thereto is conveyed by agreement or on the date title thereto is conveyed pursuant to a court order. (1) (a) (I) Whenever any real property that was previously taxable becomes legally exempt from the levy and collection of property tax for any reason, the person conveying the real property shall be relieved from all further tax obligations with respect to the real property on the date title thereto is conveyed by agreement or on the date title thereto is conveyed pursuant to a court order.
      2. On and after January 1, 1996, whenever any personal property that was previously taxable becomes legally exempt from the levy and collection of property tax for any reason, the exempt status shall become effective on the assessment date following the change in status. If the change in status occurred due to the conveyance of the personal property, the person conveying the personal property shall not be relieved of any tax obligation with respect to the personal property for the property tax year in which the conveyance occurred.
      1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, whenever any real property that was previously exempt from the levy and collection of property tax becomes taxable, the person acquiring title to the real property shall be liable for subsequent tax obligations with respect to the real property on the date title thereto is acquired by the person.
      2. On and after January 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, whenever any personal property that was previously exempt from the levy and collection of property tax becomes taxable, the taxable status shall become effective on the assessment date following the change in status. If the change in status occurred due to conveyance of the personal property, the person acquiring title to the personal property shall not be liable for any tax obligation with respect to the personal property for the property tax year in which the conveyance occurred.
  1. Whenever any personal property consisting of inventory, as defined in section 39-1-102 (7.2), becomes taxable because the personal property has become subject to a lease or rental agreement, the lessor shall not be responsible for any tax obligation on the property for the property tax year in which the agreement was executed.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1479, § 1, effective April 23. L. 96: Entire section amended, p. 45, § 3, effective March 20.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-107 as it existed prior to 1989.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 1996 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 16, Session Laws of Colorado 1996.

39-3-131. Entire property becomes tax-exempt.

Whenever any property which was previously taxable becomes exempt from the levy and collection of property tax, the treasurer shall accept payment of property taxes levied on such property for the current taxable year. The amount of such property taxes shall be calculated on the basis of the property tax levy on such property in the preceding taxable year and prorated to the date upon which title to such property was conveyed.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1479, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-108 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-132. Portion of property becomes tax-exempt.

Whenever only a portion of a parcel, tract, or lot of real property which was previously taxable becomes exempt from the levy and collection of property tax for any reason, the treasurer may, upon the basis of an appraisal and computation of the valuation for assessment of such property by the assessor, either collect the property taxes thereon for the current taxable year, calculated on the basis of the property tax levy on such property during the preceding taxable year and prorated to the date upon which title to such property was conveyed, or, if the treasurer is satisfied that there is sufficient taxable real property remaining to satisfy any lien for the amount of property taxes payable on such portion, he may defer collection of the property taxes until the following taxable year. In the event the prorated taxes on such portion are collected, the owner of the remainder of such real property shall be credited with the full amount of taxes collected when the property tax levy for the current taxable year has been fixed and made and the correct amount of property taxes determined.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1479, § 1, effective April 23.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-109 as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Where proportionate part of building exempt, proportionate part of lot exempt. If a certain proportionate part of a building is exempted under an equitable apportionment of its use as to charitable and noncharitable purposes, then a similar equitable apportionment as to charitable and noncharitable uses must be made as to the lot that supports it. Hanagan v. Rocky Ford Knights of Pythias Bldg. Ass'n, 101 Colo. 545 , 75 P.2d 780 (1938) (decided under former law).

39-3-133. Payment of property taxes extinguishes lien.

Payment to the treasurer of prorated property taxes for the current taxable year, as provided for in sections 39-3-131 and 39-3-132, together with payment of any other unpaid property taxes, delinquent interest, or charges thereon, shall extinguish the lien for property taxes on such property, or a portion thereof; however, if only a portion of any parcel, tract, or lot of real property becomes exempt from the levy and collection of property tax and no property taxes are collected at that time, the lien of property taxes levied or to be levied shall attach to the remaining portion of such real property.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1479, § 1, effective April 23. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 2223, § 4, effective April 9.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-110 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-134. Condemnation by tax-exempt agency - duties of treasurer.

In all cases where an entire property, or a portion of any parcel, tract, or lot of real property, is likely to become exempt from the levy and collection of property tax through exercise of the power of eminent domain, the treasurer shall be joined as a party respondent in any such eminent domain action, and, upon joinder and notice of the proceedings, the treasurer shall assert a claim for the amount of any prorated property taxes for the current taxable year on such property, and all other unpaid property taxes, delinquent interest, or charges thereon, with the clerk of the court in which the proceedings are filed. Upon institution of any such proceedings, the lien of property taxes levied and to be levied shall be transferred from the real property acquired or sought to be acquired to any money awarded or to be awarded for the taking of such real property. Nothing in this section shall require any treasurer to file a claim in any such proceedings involving acquisition of only a portion of any real property if the treasurer is satisfied that there is sufficient taxable real property remaining after the taking of such portion to satisfy any lien for the amount of property taxes payable on such portion taken.

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1480, § 1, effective April 23. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 2224, § 5, effective April 9.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 39-3-111 as it existed prior to 1989.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. Since § 39-3-134 is similar to § 39-3-111 as it existed prior to the 1989 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.

Burden of joining county treasurer in proceeding. This section places the burden of joining the county treasurer on the condemning authority. Hayden v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 41 Colo. App. 102, 580 P.2d 830 (1978).

Applied in Southworth v. Dept. of Hwys., 176 Colo. 82 , 489 P.2d 204 (1971).

39-3-135. Taxation of exempt property - taxes not to become lien. (Repealed)

Source: L. 89: Entire article R&RE, p. 1480, § 1, effective April 23. L. 96: Entire section repealed, p. 1851, § 3, effective June 5.

Editor's note: Before its repeal, this section was similar to former § 39-3-112 as it existed prior to 1989.

39-3-136. Legislative declaration - taxation of exempt property - possessory interests. (Repealed)

Source: L. 96: Entire section added, p. 1849, § 1, effective June 5. L. 2002: (2) amended, p. 1032, § 68, effective June 1; entire section repealed, p. 1009, § 6, effective August 7.

39-3-137. Organizations with tax-exempt status - forgiveness of taxes owed.

  1. Subject to the provisions of subsection (2) of this section, any organization that, as of August 5, 2008, owes taxes that have been levied on real or personal property shall not be required to pay the balance of the taxes owed on or after August 5, 2008, if the organization meets the following requirements:
    1. The organization is a religious, charitable, or educational organization exempt from general taxation on real and personal property pursuant to sections 39-3-106 to 39-3-113.5 and 39-3-116;
    2. The organization has, before August 5, 2008, filed an application for exemption and been granted an exemption from general taxation on real and personal property pursuant to section 39-2-117;
    3. The organization has, before August 5, 2008, and after receiving an exemption from property tax, filed an annual report required for the continuation of property tax-exempt status pursuant to section 39-2-117 (3), but the report was determined to be incomplete or otherwise incorrect when filed; and
    4. The organization, as a result of the incomplete or incorrect report referenced in paragraph (c) of this subsection (1), was denied tax-exempt status for one or more property tax years and received a property tax bill for such year or years.
  2. Any waiver of the balance of taxes owed by an organization pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall be contingent upon the reestablishment of the organization's tax-exempt status by the property tax administrator, as authorized by the state board of equalization.
  3. The state board of equalization may authorize the property tax administrator to reestablish tax-exempt status for any organization that meets the criteria specified in paragraphs (a) to (d) of subsection (1) of this section and that paid all or any portion of a property tax bill for a year or years in which the organization was denied tax-exempt status.

Source: L. 2008: Entire section added, p. 457, § 1, effective August 5. L. 2009: (2) and (3) amended, (SB 09-042), ch. 176, p. 782, § 5, effective August 5. L. 2013: (1)(a) amended, (HB 13-1300), ch. 316, p. 1705, § 123, effective August 7.

PART 2 PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIORS AND DISABLED VETERANS

39-3-201. Legislative declaration.

  1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that:
    1. Section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution, which was approved by the registered electors of the state at the 2000 general election and amended by the registered electors of the state at the 2006 general election, provides property tax exemptions for qualifying seniors and qualifying disabled veterans;
    2. It is within the legislative prerogative of the general assembly to enact legislation to implement section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution that will ensure compliance with the requirements of said section and facilitate its operation;
    3. In enacting legislation to implement section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution the general assembly has attempted to interpret the provisions of section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution in a manner that gives its words their natural and obvious significance;
    4. This part 2 reflects the considered judgment of the general assembly regarding the meaning and implementation of the provisions of section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 460, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2007: (1)(a) amended, p. 476, § 1, effective April 15.

39-3-202. Definitions.

As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Division" means the division of veterans affairs in the department of military and veterans affairs.

    (1.5) "Exemption" means the property tax exemptions for qualifying seniors and qualifying disabled veterans allowed by section 39-3-203.

    1. "Owner-occupier" means an individual who:
      1. Is an owner of record of residential real property that he or she occupies as his or her primary residence;
      2. Is not an owner of record of the residential real property that he or she occupies as his or her primary residence, but is:
        1. The spouse of an individual who is an owner of record of the residential real property and who also occupies the residential real property as his or her primary residence; or
        2. The surviving spouse of an individual who was an owner of record of the residential real property and who occupied the residential real property with the surviving spouse as his or her primary residence until his or her death; or
      3. Is not an owner of record of the residential real property that he or she occupies as his or her primary residence, only because the property has been purchased by or transferred to a trust, a corporate partnership, or any other legal entity solely for estate planning purposes and is the maker of the trust or a principal of the corporate partnership or other legal entity;
        1. Occupies residential real property as his or her primary residence; and
        2. Is the spouse of a person who also occupies the residential real property, who is not the owner of record of the property only because the property has been purchased by or transferred to a trust, a corporate partnership, or any other legal entity solely for estate planning purposes, and who is the maker of the trust or a principal of the corporate partnership or other legal entity; and
        1. Occupies residential real property as his or her primary residence; and
        2. Is the surviving spouse of a person who occupied the residential real property with the surviving spouse until his or her death, who was not the owner of record of the property at the time of his or her death only because the property had been purchased by or transferred to a trust, a corporate partnership, or any other legal entity solely for estate planning purposes prior to his or her death, and who was the maker of the trust or a principal of the corporate partnership or other legal entity prior to his or her death.
    2. "Owner-occupier" also includes any individual who, but for the confinement of the individual to a hospital, nursing home, or assisted living facility, would occupy residential real property as his or her primary residence and would meet one or more of the ownership criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection (2), if the residential real property:
      1. Is temporarily unoccupied; or
      2. Is occupied by the spouse or a financial dependent of the individual.
  2. "Owner of record" means an individual whose name appears on a valid recorded deed to residential real property as an owner of the property.

    (3.5) "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the federal department of veterans affairs as a one hundred percent permanent disability through disability retirement benefits pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department, the United States department of homeland security, or the department of the Army, Navy, or Air Force.

  3. "Surviving spouse" means an individual who was legally married to another individual at the time of the other individual's death and who has not remarried.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 461, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2007: (1) amended and (1.5) and (3.5) added, p. 476, § 2, effective April 15. L. 2016: (3.5) amended, (HB 16-1444), ch. 193, p. 682, § 1, effective July 1.

39-3-203. Property tax exemption - qualifications.

  1. For the property tax year commencing January 1, 2002, for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2006, but before January 1, 2009, and for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2012, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of the owner-occupier shall be exempt from taxation, and for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2003, but before January 1, 2006, and on or after January 1, 2009, but before January 1, 2012, fifty percent of zero dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of the owner-occupier shall be exempt from taxation if:
      1. The owner-occupier is sixty-five years of age or older as of the assessment date and has owned and occupied such residential real property as his or her primary residence for the ten years preceding the assessment date; or
      2. The owner-occupier is the surviving spouse of an owner-occupier who previously qualified for a property tax exemption for the same residential real property under subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a); and
    1. The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205 and the circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application. Under no circumstances shall an exemption be allowed for property taxes assessed during any property tax year prior to the year in which an owner-occupier first files an exemption application.

    1. (1.5) (a) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2007, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is a qualifying disabled veteran shall be exempt from taxation if:
      1. The owner-occupier has completed and filed an exemption application in the manner required by section 39-3-205; and
      2. The circumstances that qualify the property for the exemption have not changed since the filing of the application.
    2. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2015, fifty percent of the first two hundred thousand dollars of actual value of residential real property that as of the assessment date is owner-occupied and is used as the primary residence of an owner-occupier who is the surviving spouse of a qualifying disabled veteran who previously received an exemption under paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5) is exempt from taxation.
    3. Under no circumstances shall an exemption be allowed for property taxes assessed during any property tax year prior to the year for which an owner-occupier first files an exemption application.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) and subsection (1.5) of this section, if ownership of residential real property that qualified for an exemption as of the assessment date changes after the assessment date, an exemption shall be allowed only if an owner-occupier whose status as an owner-occupier qualified the property for the exemption has filed an exemption application by the deadline for filing exemption applications specified in section 39-3-205 (1).
  3. An individual who owns and occupies a dwelling unit in a common interest community, as defined in section 38-33.3-103 (8), C.R.S., as his or her primary residence, or who owns residential real property consisting of multiple-dwelling units and occupies one of the dwelling units as his or her primary residence, shall be allowed an exemption only with respect to the dwelling unit that the individual occupies as his or her primary residence.
  4. No more than one exemption per property tax year shall be allowed for a single dwelling unit of residential real property, regardless of how many owner-occupiers use the dwelling unit as their primary residence or whether one or more owner-occupiers qualify for exemptions under both subsections (1) and (1.5) of this section. The full amount of the exemption allowed by subsection (1) or (1.5) of this section shall be allowed with respect to any single dwelling unit of residential real property so long as any owner-occupier of the dwelling unit satisfies the requirements of subsection (1) or (1.5) of this section, and the fact that any other person who does not satisfy said requirements is also an owner of record of the dwelling unit shall not affect the amount of the exemption.
  5. For purposes of this part 2, two individuals who are legally married, but who own more than one piece of residential real property, shall be deemed to occupy the same primary residence and may claim no more than one exemption.
    1. Notwithstanding the ten-year occupancy requirement set forth in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section, an owner-occupier who has not actually owned and occupied residential real property for which the owner-occupier has claimed an exemption under said subsection (1) for the ten years preceding the assessment date shall be deemed to have met the ten-year requirement and shall be allowed an exemption under said subsection (1) with respect to the property if:
      1. The owner-occupier would have qualified for the exemption with respect to other residential real property that the owner-occupier owned and occupied as his or her primary residence before moving to the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed but for the fact that the other property was condemned by a governmental entity through an eminent domain proceeding; or

        (I.5) For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2015, the owner-occupier would have qualified for the exemption with respect to other residential real property that the owner-occupier owned and occupied as his or her primary residence before moving to the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed but for the fact that a natural disaster destroyed the former primary residence or otherwise rendered it uninhabitable; and

      2. The owner-occupier has not owned and occupied residential property as his or her primary residence other than the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed since the condemnation occurred.
    2. An owner-occupier who claims an exemption with respect to residential real property that he or she has not actually owned and occupied as his or her primary residence for the ten years preceding the assessment date as permitted by paragraph (a) of this subsection (6) shall provide to the assessor with whom the owner-occupier files the exemption application any information that the assessor may reasonably require to verify that the owner-occupier is entitled to an exemption.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 462, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2003: IP(1) amended, p. 1476, § 1, effective May 1. L. 2007: IP(1), (2), (4), and IP(6)(a) amended and (1.5) added, p. 477, § 3, effective April 15. L. 2009: IP(1) amended, (SB 09-276), ch. 437, p. 2426, § 1, effective June 4. L. 2010: IP(1) amended, (SB 10-190), ch. 311, p. 1461, § 2, effective May 27. L. 2014: (1.5)(a.5) and (6)(a)(I.5) added and (6)(a)(I) amended, (HB 14-1373), ch. 266, p. 1066, § 1, effective May 26.

39-3-204. Notice of property tax exemption.

No later than May 1, 2013, and no later than May 1 of each year thereafter in which an assessor sends a notice of valuation pursuant to section 39-5-121 (1)(a) that is not included with the tax bill, each assessor shall mail to each residential real property address in the assessor's county notice of the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1). As soon as practicable after January 1, 2014, and as soon as practicable after January 1 of each year thereafter, each county treasurer shall, at the treasurer's discretion, mail or electronically send to each person whose name appears on the tax list and warrant as an owner of residential real property notice of the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1). The treasurer must mail or electronically send the notice in each year on or before the date on which the treasurer mails the property tax statement for the previous property tax year pursuant to section 39-10-103. No later than May 1, 2008, and no later than each May 1 thereafter, each assessor also shall mail to each residential property address in the assessor's county notice of the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5). No later than May 1, 2007, the division shall mail to the residential property address of each person residing in the state who the division believes is a qualifying disabled veteran notice of the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5) for the 2007 property tax year. However, the sending of notice to a person by the division does not constitute a determination by the division that the person sent notice is entitled to an exemption. The notice shall be in a form prescribed by the administrator, who shall consult with the division before prescribing the form of the notice of the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5), and shall include a statement of the eligibility criteria for the exemptions and instructions for obtaining an exemption application. To reduce mailing costs, an assessor may coordinate with the treasurer of the same county to include notice with the tax statement for the previous property tax year mailed pursuant to section 39-10-103 or may include notice with the notice of valuation mailed pursuant to section 39-5-121 (1)(a).

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 464, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2007: Entire section amended, p. 478, § 4, effective April 15. L. 2013: Entire section amended, (HB 13-1145), ch. 98, p. 314, § 1, effective April 4.

39-3-205. Exemption applications - penalty for providing false information - confidentiality.

    1. To claim the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1), an individual shall file with the assessor a completed exemption application no later than July 15 of the first property tax year for which the exemption is claimed. An application returned by mail shall be deemed filed on the date it is postmarked.
    2. To claim the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5), an individual shall file with the division a completed exemption application no later than July 1 of the first property tax year for which the exemption is claimed. An application returned by mail shall be deemed filed on the date it is postmarked.
    1. An exemption application shall be a form prescribed by the administrator, who shall consult with the division before prescribing the form of the application for the exemption allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5), and shall require an applicant to provide the following information:
      1. The applicant's name, mailing address, date of birth, and social security number;
      2. The address and schedule or parcel number of the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed;
      3. The name and social security number of each individual who occupies as his or her primary residence the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed;
      4. If a trust is the owner of record of the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed, the names of the maker of the trust, the trustee, and the beneficiaries of the trust;
      5. If a corporate partnership or other legal entity is the owner of record of the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed, the names of the principals of the corporate partnership or other legal entity;
      6. An affirmation, in a form prescribed by the administrator, that the applicant believes, under penalty of perjury in the second degree, as defined in section 18-8-503, C.R.S., that all information provided by the applicant is correct; and
      7. Any other information that the administrator may reasonably require as necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the exemption.
    2. The exemption application shall also contain a statement that an applicant, or in the case of residential real property for which the owner of record is a trust, the trustee, has a legal obligation to inform the assessor within sixty days of any change in the ownership or occupancy of residential real property for which an exemption has been applied for or allowed that would prevent an exemption from being allowed for the property.

    (2.5) For the purpose of verifying the eligibility of each applicant for the exemption allowed to qualifying disabled veterans under section 39-3-203 (1.5) efficiently and with minimal inconvenience to each applicant, the division shall determine whether an applicant for the exemption is a qualifying disabled veteran. With respect to any application timely filed by July 1 pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section, the division shall, if possible, determine whether the applicant is a qualifying disabled veteran and send notice of its determination to the applicant on or before the immediately succeeding August 1. If the division determines that the applicant is a qualifying disabled veteran, it shall also send notice of its determination and a copy of the exemption application to the assessor for the county where the property is located. If the division is unable to determine whether the applicant is a qualifying disabled veteran on or before said August 1, it shall send preliminary notice to both the applicant and the assessor that its determination is pending and shall follow up the preliminary notice by sending final notice of its ultimate determination to the applicant and, together with a copy of the exemption application, to the assessor as soon as possible thereafter.

    1. In addition to any penalties prescribed by law for perjury in the second degree, an applicant who knowingly provides false information on an exemption application or files more than one exemption application in any property tax year:
      1. Shall not be entitled to an exemption;
      2. Shall be required to pay, to the treasurer of any county in which an exemption was improperly allowed due to the provision by the applicant of false information or the filing by the applicant of more than one exemption application, an amount equal to the amount of property taxes not paid as a result of the exemption being improperly allowed; and
      3. Shall, upon conviction of perjury, be required to pay to the treasurer of any county in which an invalid exemption application was filed an additional amount equal to twice the amount of the property taxes that would not have had to be paid had the exemption application been valid plus interest. Interest shall be calculated at the annual rate calculated pursuant to section 39-21-110.5 (2) and (3) from the date the invalid exemption application was filed until the date the applicant makes the payment required by this subparagraph (III).
    2. If an applicant or a trustee fails to inform the assessor within sixty days of any change in the ownership or occupancy of residential real property for which an exemption has been applied for or allowed that would prevent an exemption from being allowed for the property as required by paragraph (b) of subsection (2) of this section:
      1. An exemption shall not be allowed with respect to the residential real property; and
      2. The applicant or trustee shall be required to pay, to the treasurer of any county in which an exemption was improperly allowed due to the applicant's or trustee's failure to immediately inform the assessor of any change in the ownership or occupancy of residential real property, an amount equal to the amount of property taxes not paid as a result of the exemption being improperly allowed plus interest. Interest shall be calculated at the annual rate calculated pursuant to section 39-21-110.5 (2) and (3) from the date on which the change in the ownership or occupancy occurred until the date the applicant makes the payment required by this subparagraph (II).
    3. Any amount required to be paid to a treasurer pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection (3) shall be deemed part of the lien of general taxes imposed on the person required to pay the amount and shall have the priority specified in section 39-1-107 (2).
    1. Completed exemption applications shall be kept confidential; except that:
        1. An assessor or the division may release statistical compilations or informational summaries of any information contained in exemption applications and shall provide a copy of an exemption application to the applicant who returned the application, the treasurer of the same county as the assessor, the administrator, the state treasurer, or the state auditor upon request or as otherwise required by this part 2.
        2. An assessor or the division may introduce a copy of an exemption application as evidence in any administrative hearing or legal proceeding in which the accuracy or veracity of the exemption application is at issue so long as neither the applicant's social security number nor any other social security number set forth in the application are divulged.
      1. A treasurer, the administrator, the state treasurer, or the state auditor shall keep confidential each individual exemption application that it may receive from an assessor or the division but may release statistical compilations or informational summaries of any information contained in exemption applications and may introduce a copy of an exemption application as evidence in any administrative hearing or legal proceeding in which the accuracy or veracity of the exemption application is at issue so long as neither the applicant's social security number nor any other social security number set forth in the application are divulged.
      2. The administrator may share information contained in an exemption application, including any social security number set forth in the application, with the department of revenue to the extent necessary to enable the administrator to verify that the applicant satisfies legal requirements for claiming the exemption.
    2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (4), an assessor, the division, a treasurer, the administrator, the state treasurer, or the state auditor shall not give any other person any listing of individuals who have applied for an exemption or any other information that would enable a person to easily assemble a mailing list of individuals who have applied for an exemption.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 464, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2007: (1), IP(2)(a), and (4) amended and (2.5) added, p. 478, § 5, effective April 15. L. 2011: (2.5) amended, (HB 11-1226), ch. 73, p. 201, § 1, effective March 29. L. 2016: (4)(a)(III) added, (HB 16-1175), ch. 332, p. 1344, § 2, effective June 10.

39-3-206. Notice to individuals returning incomplete or nonqualifying exemption applications - denial of exemption - administrative remedies.

    1. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a.5) of subsection (2) of this section, an assessor shall only grant the exemption allowed to qualifying seniors under section 39-3-203 (1) to an applicant who has timely returned an exemption application in accordance with section 39-3-205 (1)(a) that establishes that the applicant is entitled to the exemption.
    2. If the information provided on or with an application for the exemption allowed to qualifying seniors under section 39-3-203 (1) indicates that the applicant is not entitled to the exemption, or is insufficient to allow the assessor to determine whether or not the applicant is entitled to the exemption, the assessor shall deny the application and mail to the applicant a statement providing the reasons for the denial and informing the applicant of the applicant's right to contest the denial pursuant to subsection (2) of this section. The assessor shall mail the statement no later than August 1 of the property tax year for which the exemption application was filed.

    1. (1.5) (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a.7) of subsection (2) of this section, the division shall only accept an application for the exemption allowed to qualifying disabled veterans under section 39-3-203 (1.5) if the applicant timely returned the exemption application in accordance with section 39-3-205 (1)(b), and an assessor shall only grant the exemption if the division verifies that the applicant is a qualified disabled veteran and the exemption application forwarded by the division to the assessor pursuant to section 39-3-205 (2.5) establishes that the applicant meets the other requirements to be entitled to the exemption.
    2. If the information provided on or with an application for the exemption allowed to qualifying disabled veterans under section 39-3-203 (1.5) that is forwarded by the division to an assessor pursuant to section 39-3-205 (2.5) indicates that the applicant is not entitled to the exemption, or is insufficient to allow the assessor to determine whether or not the applicant is entitled to the exemption, the assessor shall deny the application and mail to the applicant a statement providing the reasons for the denial and informing the applicant of the applicant's right to contest the denial pursuant to subsection (2) of this section. The assessor shall mail the statement no later than August 1 of the property tax year for which the exemption application was filed.
    1. An applicant whose exemption application has been denied pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection (1) or paragraph (b) of subsection (1.5) of this section may contest the denial by requesting a hearing before the county commissioners sitting as the county board of equalization no later than August 15 of the property tax year for which the exemption application was filed. The hearing shall be held on or after August 1 and no later than September 1 of the property tax year for which the exemption application was filed, and the decision of the county board of equalization is not subject to further administrative appeal by either the applicant or the assessor. An applicant may not contest a determination by the division that the applicant is not a qualifying disabled veteran at a hearing requested pursuant to this paragraph (a).
    2. An individual who wishes to claim the exemption for qualifying seniors allowed by section 39-3-203 (1), but who has not timely filed an exemption application with the assessor by July 15, may file a late exemption application no later than the August 15 that immediately follows that deadline. The assessor shall accept any such application but may not accept any late application filed after August 15. The assessor shall grant an exemption if an accepted late application establishes that the applicant is entitled to the exemption. A decision of an assessor to disallow the filing of a late application after August 15 or to grant or deny an exemption to an applicant who has filed a late application after July 15 but no later than August 15 is final, and an applicant who is denied late filing or an exemption may not contest the denial.
    3. An individual who wishes to claim the exemption for qualifying disabled veterans allowed by section 39-3-203 (1.5), but who has not timely filed an exemption application with the division, may request that the division waive the application deadline and allow the individual to file a late exemption application no later than the August 1 that immediately follows the original application deadline. The division may accept an application if, in the division's sole discretion, the applicant shows good cause for not timely filing an application. If the division accepts a late application, it shall determine whether the applicant is a qualifying disabled veteran and shall mail notice of its determination to the applicant no later than the August 25 that immediately follows the late application deadline. If the division determines that a veteran is a qualifying disabled veteran, it shall mail a copy of the notice of its determination to the assessor for the county in which the property for which the applicant has claimed the exemption is located and shall include with the notice a copy of the applicant's exemption application. The assessor shall grant an exemption if the notice and application forwarded by the division to the assessor establish that the applicant is entitled to the exemption. A decision of the division to allow or disallow the filing of a late application or of an assessor to grant or deny an exemption to an applicant who has filed a late application is final, and an applicant who is denied late filing or an exemption may not contest the denial.
    4. The county board of equalization may appoint independent referees to conduct hearings requested pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) on behalf of the county board and to make findings and submit recommendations to the county board for its final action.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 466, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2002: (2) amended, p. 842, § 1, effective August 7. L. 2003: (1)(a) amended and (2)(a.5) added, p. 2479, §§ 1, 2, effective June 5. L. 2007: (1), (2)(a), and (2)(a.5) amended and (1.5) and (2)(a.7) added, pp. 480, 481, §§ 6, 7, effective April 15. L. 2011: (1.5) and (2)(a.7) amended, (HB 11-1226), ch. 73, p. 202, § 2, effective March 29. L. 2013: (2)(a.5) amended, (HB 13-1145), ch. 98, p. 315, § 2, effective April 4. L. 2016: (1)(b), (1.5)(b), (2)(a), (2)(a.5), and (2)(a.7) amended, (HB 16-1175), ch. 332, p. 1345, § 3, effective January 1, 2017.

39-3-207. Reporting of exemptions - reimbursement to local governmental entities.

  1. No later than October 10, 2002, and no later than each October 10 thereafter through October 10, 2016, and no later than September 10, 2017, and no later than each September 10 thereafter, each assessor shall forward to the administrator a report on the exemptions allowed in his or her county for the current property tax year. The report shall include:
    1. A statement of the total amount of actual value of residential real property within the county that is exempted from taxation;
    2. With respect to each unit of residential real property for which an exemption is allowed:
      1. The legal description of the property;
      2. The schedule or parcel number for the property;
      3. The name and social security number of the applicant who claimed an exemption for the property and each additional person who occupies the property; and
      4. A statement of the taxable and tax exempt value of the property; and
    3. For reports issued for the 2007 property tax year and for each subsequent property tax year, separate identification, in such form as the administrator may require, of the units of residential real property within the county exempted from taxation under section 39-3-203 (1.5) and of the total amount of actual value of the property so exempted.
      1. The administrator shall examine the reports sent by each assessor pursuant to subsection (1) of this section to ensure that no applicant has claimed an exemption without meeting all legal requirements for claiming the exemption. No later than November 1, 2002, and no later than each November 1 thereafter, if the administrator determines that an applicant has claimed more than one exemption, the administrator shall provide written notice to the applicant that the applicant has claimed more than one exemption and is therefore not entitled to any exemption. No later than November 1, 2016, and no later than each November 1 thereafter, if the administrator determines that the applicant and the applicant's spouse have claimed separate exemptions in violation of section 39-3-203 (5), that the applicant has claimed an exemption for residential real property that the applicant does not own and occupy as the applicant's primary residence as required by section 39-3-203 (1), or that the applicant is otherwise ineligible to claim an exemption, the administrator shall provide written notice to the applicant that the applicant is ineligible for the exemption and specify the reasons for the determination of ineligibility. The notice shall also include a statement specifying the deadline and procedures for protesting the denial of the exemption or exemptions claimed. (2) (a) (I) The administrator shall examine the reports sent by each assessor pursuant to subsection (1) of this section to ensure that no applicant has claimed an exemption without meeting all legal requirements for claiming the exemption. No later than November 1, 2002, and no later than each November 1 thereafter, if the administrator determines that an applicant has claimed more than one exemption, the administrator shall provide written notice to the applicant that the applicant has claimed more than one exemption and is therefore not entitled to any exemption. No later than November 1, 2016, and no later than each November 1 thereafter, if the administrator determines that the applicant and the applicant's spouse have claimed separate exemptions in violation of section 39-3-203 (5), that the applicant has claimed an exemption for residential real property that the applicant does not own and occupy as the applicant's primary residence as required by section 39-3-203 (1), or that the applicant is otherwise ineligible to claim an exemption, the administrator shall provide written notice to the applicant that the applicant is ineligible for the exemption and specify the reasons for the determination of ineligibility. The notice shall also include a statement specifying the deadline and procedures for protesting the denial of the exemption or exemptions claimed.
      2. An applicant whose claims for exemption are denied by the administrator pursuant to subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) may file a written protest with the administrator no later than November 15 of the year in which the exemption or exemptions were denied. If the ground for the denial is that the applicant, or the applicant and the applicant's spouse, claimed multiple exemptions, the sole ground for a protest is that the applicant, or the applicant and the applicant's spouse, filed only one claim for an exemption and the protest shall specify property or properties identified by the administrator in the notice denying exemptions for which no exemption was claimed. The administrator shall request that any appropriate assessor check the assessor's records of exemption applications to determine whether the applicant filed a disputed exemption application and shall decide the protest accordingly. If the ground for the denial is that the applicant is not an owner-occupier of the residential real property for which an exemption is claimed, the sole grounds for a protest are that the applicant actually is an owner-occupier or that the applicant qualifies for an exemption for the property under section 39-3-203 (6). If a protest is denied, the administrator shall mail the applicant a written statement of the basis for the denial and a copy of each exemption application filed with an assessor that the applicant claimed had not been filed.
    1. No later than December 1, 2002, and no later than each December 1 thereafter, and after examining the reports sent by each assessor, denying claims for exemptions, and deciding protests in accordance with paragraph (a) of this subsection (2), the administrator shall provide written notice to the assessor of each county in which an exemption application has been denied because the applicant filed multiple exemption applications with the identity of the applicant who filed multiple exemption applications and the denial of the exemption. No later than December 1, 2016, and no later than each December 1 thereafter, and after examining the reports sent by each assessor, denying claims for exemptions, and deciding protests in accordance with paragraph (a) of this subsection (2), the administrator shall also provide written notice to the assessor of each county in which an exemption application has been denied for any other reason with the identity of the applicant and the denial of the exemption, specifying the reason for the denial. No later than January 10, 2017, and no later than each January 10 thereafter, each assessor shall forward to the administrator a partial copy of the tax warrant for the assessor's county that includes only property for which the assessor has granted an exemption. The administrator shall examine the tax warrants to ensure that no additional exemptions have been allowed since the administrator examined the reports previously received from the assessors and that each assessor has removed from the tax warrant all exemptions that the administrator previously denied. No later than January 17, 2017, and no later than each January 17 thereafter, the administrator shall notify each assessor and each treasurer of any exemptions to be removed from the tax warrant.
  2. No later than April 1, 2003, and no later than each April 1 thereafter through April 1, 2016, to enable the state treasurer to issue a reimbursement warrant to each treasurer in accordance with subsection (4) of this section, each treasurer shall forward to the state treasurer a report on the exemptions allowed in his or her county for the previous property tax year. No later than March 1, 2017, and no later than March 1 of each year thereafter, each treasurer shall forward the report to the administrator, who shall cross-check it as specified in subsection (3.5) of this section before correcting it, if necessary, and forwarding it to the state treasurer to enable the state treasurer to issue a reimbursement warrant to each treasurer in accordance with subsection (4) of this section. The report shall include:
    1. A statement of the total amount of actual value of residential real property within the county that was exempted from taxation and the total amount of property tax revenues lost by local governmental entities within the county as a result of the exemption that must be reimbursed by the state;
    2. With respect to each unit of residential real property for which an exemption was allowed:
      1. The legal description of the property;
      2. The schedule or parcel number for the property;
      3. The name of the applicant who claimed an exemption for the property and each additional person who occupies the property; and
      4. A statement of the taxable and tax exempt value of the property and the amount of taxes due on the property; and
    3. For reports issued for the 2007 property tax year and for each subsequent property tax year, separate identification, in such form as the administrator may require, of the units of residential real property within the county exempted from taxation under section 39-3-203 (1.5), the total amount of actual value of the property so exempted, and the total amount of property tax revenues lost by local government entities within the county as a result of the exemption.

    (3.5) After receiving reports from each treasurer pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, the administrator shall cross-check the reports to identify any exemption allowed in a county that must be denied due to a failure of the individual allowed the exemption to satisfy all legal requirements for claiming the exemption. The administrator shall remove any exemption that must be denied from the report in which it appears and shall forward all reports to the state treasurer no later than the April 1 immediately following the receipt of the reports by the administrator. In addition, if the administrator identifies any exemption improperly allowed for a prior property tax year commencing on or after January 1, 2016, for which the state treasurer reimbursed a treasurer pursuant to subsection (4) of this section or identifies any exemption properly allowed for such a prior property tax year for which the state treasurer did not reimburse a treasurer, the administrator shall advise the state treasurer to adjust the current year reimbursement to the treasurer to correct the error. No later than that April 1, the administrator shall also notify the treasurer and assessor of each county of the exemptions removed from the report for the county and any resulting and other adjustments to the amount of current year reimbursement to be paid by the state treasurer to the treasurer.

    (3.7) In accordance with section 25-2-103 (4.5), C.R.S., the administrator shall annually provide to the state registrar of vital statistics of the department of public health and environment a list, by name and social security number, of every individual who received an exemption for the immediately preceding year so that the registrar can provide to the administrator a list of all such individuals who have died. No later than April 1, 2017, and no later than each April 1 thereafter, the administrator shall forward to the assessor of each county, the name and social security number of each deceased individual who received an exemption for the immediately preceding year for residential real property located within the county so that the assessor can terminate the exemption for the property.

      1. In accordance with section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution, no later than April 15, 2003, and no later than each April 15 thereafter, the state treasurer shall issue a warrant to each treasurer for the amount needed to fully reimburse all local governmental entities within the treasurer's county for the amount of property tax revenues lost as a result of the application of the exemption to property taxes that accrued during the previous property tax year and are payable during the year in which the state treasurer issues the warrant. The reimbursement shall be paid from the state general fund and shall not be subject to the statutory limitation on state general fund appropriations set forth in section 24-75-201.1, C.R.S. (4) (a) (I) In accordance with section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution, no later than April 15, 2003, and no later than each April 15 thereafter, the state treasurer shall issue a warrant to each treasurer for the amount needed to fully reimburse all local governmental entities within the treasurer's county for the amount of property tax revenues lost as a result of the application of the exemption to property taxes that accrued during the previous property tax year and are payable during the year in which the state treasurer issues the warrant. The reimbursement shall be paid from the state general fund and shall not be subject to the statutory limitation on state general fund appropriations set forth in section 24-75-201.1, C.R.S.
      2. As used in this paragraph (a), with respect to exemptions allowed for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2016, "property tax revenues lost as a result of the application of the exemption" includes only those revenues lost as a result of exemptions properly allowed in accordance with the requirements of this part 2 and does not include any revenues lost as a result of an exemption being erroneously allowed.
    1. Each treasurer shall distribute the total amount received from the state treasurer pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (4) to the local governmental entities within the treasurer's county as if the lost tax revenues had been regularly paid. When a treasurer distributes said amount, the treasurer shall provide each local governmental entity with a statement of the amount distributed to the local governmental entity that represents reimbursement received from the state for property tax revenues lost as a result of the exemption. In accordance with section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution, moneys distributed to a local governmental entity as reimbursement for property tax revenues lost as a result of the exemption shall not be included in the local governmental entity's fiscal year spending for purposes of section 20 of article X of the state constitution.

    (4.5) In accordance with subsection (3.5) of this section, for any property tax year commencing on or after January 1, 2016, the state treasurer shall not reimburse a treasurer for property tax revenues lost as a result of an exemption erroneously allowed in the treasurer's county. If, pursuant to subsection (3.5) of this section, the administrator advises the state treasurer that the state treasurer has provided either too much or too little reimbursement to a treasurer for exemptions allowed in the treasurer's county for any prior property tax year commencing on or after January 1, 2016, the state treasurer shall adjust the reimbursement for the current property tax year as directed by the administrator in order to correct the error.

  3. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the reports required by this section and the contents thereof shall be kept confidential by an assessor, a treasurer, the administrator, the state treasurer, or the state auditor; except that said persons may provide the reports to each other as required or authorized by law.
  4. Repealed.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 467, § 1, effective April 25. L. 2002: IP(1) amended, p. 842, § 2, effective August 7. L. 2007: (1)(c) and (3)(c) added and (3)(b)(III) amended, p. 482, §§ 8, 9, effective April 15. L. 2012: (6) added, (HB 12-1326), ch. 195, p. 777, § 4, effective May 22. L. 2016: (6) amended, (HB 16-1161), ch. 35, p. 89, § 1, effective March 22; IP(1), (2), IP(3), and (4)(a) amended and (3.5), (3.7), and (4.5) added, (HB 16-1175), ch. 332, p. 1346, § 4, effective June 10. L. 2020: (6) repealed, (HB 20-1387), ch. 174, p. 801, § 1, effective June 29.

39-3-208. Auditing of property tax exemption program.

The state auditor shall periodically audit the property tax exemption program administered pursuant to this part 2 to ensure that the program is operating in compliance with section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution and this part 2. In connection with an audit, the state auditor may suggest means of improving the administration of the program. Upon request, an assessor, a treasurer, the administrator, or the state treasurer shall provide the state auditor with any exemption applications, reports, or other documents relevant to the administration of the program.

Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 469, § 1, effective April 25.

39-3-209. State expenditure for property tax exemptions - mechanism for refunding of excess state revenue - legislative declaration.

  1. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that:
    1. Although the exemptions allowed by this part 2 are exemptions from local government property taxes, the state must reimburse local governments for the net amount of property tax revenues lost as a result of the exemptions and therefore bears the full cost of the exemptions;
    2. Section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution authorizes the general assembly to raise or lower the maximum amount of actual value of residential real property of which fifty percent is exempt pursuant to this part 2;
    3. In order to eliminate the cost of the exemption and fund other state needs, the general assembly, as authorized by section 3.5 of article X of the state constitution, has at times temporarily suspended the exemption for qualifying seniors allowed by this part 2 by lowering to zero the maximum amount of actual value of residential real property of which fifty percent is exempt;
    4. The general assembly intends to allow seniors to rely on predictable and sustainable exemptions by fully funding the property tax exemption for qualifying seniors in the future, and it is more likely to be able to do so if the cost of the exemption, which exclusively benefits taxpayers who reside in Colorado, constitutes a refund of excess state revenues for state fiscal years for which such refunds are required; and
    5. Section 20 of article X of the state constitution authorizes the state to use any reasonable method to make required refunds of excess state revenues, and the payment by the state of reimbursement to local governments for the net amount of property tax revenues lost as a result of the property tax exemptions allowed by this part 2, which exemptions directly reduce the tax liability of taxpaying Colorado residents throughout the state, is a reasonable method of making such refunds.
  2. For any state fiscal year commencing on or after July 1, 2017, for which state revenues, as defined in section 24-77-103.6 (6)(c), exceed the excess state revenues cap, as defined in section 24-77-103.6 (6)(b)(I)(C) or (6)(b)(I)(D), and are required to be refunded in accordance with section 20 of article X of the state constitution, the lesser of all reimbursement paid by the state treasurer to each treasurer as required by section 39-3-207 (4) for the property tax year that commenced during the state fiscal year or an amount of such reimbursement equal to the amount of excess state revenues for the state fiscal year that are required to be refunded is a refund of such excess state revenues.

Source: L. 2017: Entire section added, (SB 17-267), ch. 267, p. 1467, § 24, effective May 30.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 17-267, see section 1 of chapter 267, Session Laws of Colorado 2017.

Deferrals

ARTICLE 3.5 TAX DEFERRAL FOR THE ELDERLY AND MILITARY PERSONNEL

Law reviews: For article, "Survey of Colorado Tax Liens", see 14 Colo. Law. 1765 (1985); for article "An Update of Appendices from Collecting Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest in Colorado", see 15 Colo. Law. 990 (1986).

Section

39-3.5-101. Definitions.

As used in this article 3.5, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Homestead" means the owner-occupied residence of the taxpayer and includes owner-occupied units in a condominium, townhouse, or similar structure and an owner-occupied mobile home.

    (1.5) "Mobile home" means any wheeled vehicle, exceeding either eight feet in width or thirty-two feet in length, excluding towing gear and bumpers, without motive power, which is designed and commonly used for occupancy by persons for residential purposes, in either temporary or permanent locations, and which may be drawn over the public highways by a motor vehicle.

    (1.8) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (1.8) is effective until the revisor of statutes receives notice. See the editor's note following this section. ] "Person called into military service" means a member of the Army National Guard of the United States, the Army reserve, the Naval reserve, the Marine Corps reserve, the Air National Guard of the United States, the Air Force reserve, or the Coast Guard reserve who has been ordered to active duty pursuant to 10 U.S.C. sec. 12301 (a) or 12302 for a period of more than thirty consecutive days in a time of war or national emergency declared by the congress or the president of the United States. "Active duty" includes any period during which a person called into military service is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause.

    (1.8) [ Editor's note: This version of subsection (1.8) is effective upon notice to the revisor of statutes. See the editor's note following this section. ] "Person called into military service" means a member of the Army National Guard of the United States, the Army reserve, the Naval reserve, the Marine Corps reserve, the Air National Guard of the United States, the Air Force reserve, the Space National Guard of the United States, or the Coast Guard reserve who has been ordered to active duty pursuant to 10 U.S.C. sec. 12301 (a) or 12302 for a period of more than thirty consecutive days in a time of war or national emergency declared by the congress or the president of the United States. "Active duty" includes any period during which a person called into military service is absent from duty on account of sickness, wounds, leave, or other lawful cause.

  2. "Real property taxes" means all ad valorem taxes levied on a homestead, including special assessments and all other charges which are recoverable by law at the annual real estate tax sale, and includes special assessments and all other charges which are recoverable by law at the personal property tax sale of a mobile home, as provided in section 39-10-111.
  3. "Tax-deferred property" means the property upon which real property taxes are deferred pursuant to this article.

    (3.5) "Tax-growth cap" means an amount equal to the average of a person's real property taxes paid on the same homestead for the two property tax years preceding the year a deferral is claimed, increased by four percent.

  4. "Taxpayer" means a person who has filed or whose guardian, conservator, or attorney-in-fact has filed a claim for deferral pursuant to this article or persons who have jointly filed a claim for deferral under this article.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 471, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: (1) and (4) amended, p. 1411, § 1, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (1) and (2) amended and (1.5) added, p. 1283, § 9, effective January 1, 1989. L. 2003: (1.8) added, p. 2112, § 1, effective May 22. L. 2021: IP amended and (3.5) added, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1808, § 5, effective June 23; IP and (1.8) amended, (HB 21-1231), ch. 206, p. 1079, § 12, effective (see editor's note).

Editor's note: Section 15(2) of chapter 206 (HB 21-1231), Session Laws of Colorado 2021, provides that the act changing this section takes effect only if the federal government creates the Space National Guard in the "FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act" and takes effect on the date identified in the written notice from the resource and legislative director of the department of military and veterans affairs to the revisor of statutes, as required in section 10 of chapter 206, that the Space National Guard was created or, if the notice does not specify that date, on the date of the notice to the revisor of statutes, or on May 28, 2021, whichever is later. As of publication date, the revisor of statutes had not received notice.

39-3.5-102. Deferral of tax on homestead - qualifications - filing of claim.

    1. Subject to the provisions of this article, a person who is sixty-five years of age or older or who is a person called into military service on January 1 of the year in which the person files a claim under this section may elect to defer the payment of real property taxes. To exercise this option, the taxpayer shall file a claim for deferral with the treasurer of the county in which the taxpayer's homestead is located. The claim shall be filed after January 1 and on or before April 1 of each year in which the taxpayer claims the deferral.
    2. Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection (1), a person called into military service at any time between January 1, 2003, and June 30, 2003, may defer the payment of real property taxes for the property tax year 2002 by filing a claim pursuant to this section on or before June 30, 2003.
      1. Subject to the provisions of this article 3.5, including the limitations set forth in subsection (1)(c)(II) of this section, beginning January 1, 2023, a person who is not otherwise eligible for deferral under this section may elect to defer the payment of the portion of real property taxes that exceed the person's tax-growth cap. To exercise this option, the taxpayer must file a claim for deferral with the treasurer of the county in which the taxpayer's homestead is located. The taxpayer must file the claim after January 1 and on or before April 1 of each year in which the taxpayer claims the deferral.
      2. In addition to any other limitations set forth in this article 3.5, the minimum amount of real property taxes that may be deferred under this subsection (1)(c) at one time is one hundred dollars, and the total amount of real property taxes that a person may defer under this subsection (1)(c) for all years shall not exceed ten thousand dollars. If a taxpayer's surviving spouse elects to continue deferral under section 39-3.5-112 (1.5)(a), the same total limit applies to the taxpayer and the surviving spouse.
      3. A person who previously deferred real property taxes as a person called into military service but is no longer eligible for a new deferral on that basis may defer additional real property taxes under this subsection (1)(c).
  1. When a taxpayer who is sixty-five years of age or older, who is a person called into military service, or who is otherwise eligible under subsection (1)(c) of this section files a valid claim for deferral under subsection (1) of this section, it has the effect of:
    1. Deferring the payment of the taxpayer's real property taxes or in the case of a person who is otherwise eligible, a portion of the taxpayer's real property taxes, for the calendar year previous to the year in which the claim is filed;
    2. Continuing the deferral of taxes which have been deferred under this article for previous years which have not become delinquent pursuant to section 39-3.5-111;
    3. Terminating and releasing the lien for the general taxes so deferred created by section 39-1-107 and substituting therefor the lien for said deferred taxes created by section 39-3.5-105.

    1. (2.5) (a) A person called into military service may defer only the real property taxes payable in a year in which the person is a person called into military service. A person who is no longer a person called into military service may file a valid claim in a subsequent year to continue the prior allowable deferral of taxes.
    2. A person who defers a portion of real property taxes under subsection (1)(c) of this section may file a valid claim in a subsequent year to continue the prior allowable deferral of taxes.
  2. If a guardian, conservator, or attorney-in-fact has been appointed for a taxpayer otherwise qualified to claim deferral of taxes under this article, the guardian, conservator, or attorney-in-fact may act for such taxpayer in claiming the deferral.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 472, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 2003: (1) and IP(2) amended and (2.5) added, p. 2112, § 2, effective May 22. L. 2021: (1)(c) added and IP(2), (2)(a), and (2.5) amended, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1809, § 6, effective June 23.

39-3.5-103. Property entitled to deferral.

  1. In order to qualify for real property tax deferral under this article 3.5, the property shall meet all of the following requirements at the time the claim is filed and so long thereafter as payment is deferred:
    1. The property must be the homestead of the taxpayer claiming the deferral.
    2. The taxpayer claiming the deferral must, by himself or jointly with another person residing in the homestead, own the fee simple estate or be purchasing the fee simple estate under a recorded instrument of sale or own the mobile home or be purchasing the mobile home under a recorded instrument of sale; except that nonresidence of the joint owner in the homestead because of ill health of the joint owner shall not prevent the taxpayer from meeting the requirement of this paragraph (b).
    3. The property for which the deferral is claimed must not be income-producing.
    4. Repealed.
      1. Either of the following applies to the property:
        1. The owner of the property is a person who is sixty-five years of age or older, and the total value of all liens of mortgages and deeds of trust on the property, excluding any mortgage or deed of trust that the holder has agreed, on a form designated by the state treasurer, to subordinate to the lien of the state for deferred taxes, is less than or equal to seventy-five percent of the actual value of the property, as determined by the county assessor; or
        2. The owner of the property is a person called into military service or a person eligible for deferral under section 39-3.5-102 (1)(c), and the total value of all liens of mortgages and deeds of trust on the property, excluding any mortgage or deed of trust that the holder has agreed, on a form designated by the state treasurer, to subordinate to the lien of the state for deferred taxes, is less than or equal to ninety percent of the actual value of the property, as determined by the county assessor.
      2. For purposes of this paragraph (d.5), the actual value of the property shall be the most recent appraisal by the county assessor as of the time the claim for deferral is submitted to the county treasurer.
    5. All real property taxes for years prior to the year for which the election is made must be paid.
    6. The cumulative value of the deferral provided in this section plus the interest accrued on the deferral provided in section 39-3.5-105 (5) shall not exceed the market value of the property less the value of all mortgages which constitute liens upon the property and any other liens upon the property filed prior to the date of recordation of the certificate for deferral.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 472, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: Entire section R&RE, p. 1411, § 2, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (1)(b) amended and (1)(f) added, p. 1283, § 10, effective January 1, 1989. L. 2005: (1)(d) amended and (1)(d.5) added, p. 877, § 1, effective June 1. L. 2021: IP(1), IP(1)(d.5)(I), and (1)(d.5)(I)(B) amended, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1810, § 7, effective June 23.

Editor's note: Subsection (1)(d)(II) provided for the repeal of subsection (1)(d), effective January 1, 2006. (See L. 2005, p. 877 .)

39-3.5-104. Claim form - contents.

  1. A taxpayer's claim for deferral shall be in writing on a form prescribed by the state treasurer and supplied by the county treasurer and shall:
    1. Describe the property;
    2. Recite facts which establish eligibility for deferral under the provisions of this article;
    3. List all mortgages and deeds of trust which constitute liens upon the property, together with the book and page number of the county records at which each is recorded and the date of recordation;
    4. List all mortgages which constitute liens upon a mobile home, together with the street address and county where the record of any such mortgage is on file with the authorized agent for the department of revenue;
    5. On or after January 1, 2006, list the actual value of the property based on the most recent appraisal by the county assessor;
    6. Demonstrate that the cumulative value of the deferral plus the interest accrued on the deferral does not exceed the market value of the property less the value of all mortgages which constitute liens upon the property and any other liens upon the property filed prior to the date of recordation of the certificate for deferral.
  2. The form prescribed by the state treasurer shall contain a statement, in bold-faced type, that states substantially as follows:

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER: YOU COULD LOSE YOUR PROPERTY IF THE CUMULATIVE AMOUNT OF THE DEFERRAL PLUS INTEREST EXCEEDS THE MARKET VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY LESS THE VALUE OF ANY LIENS.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 472, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: Entire section R&RE, p. 1412, § 3, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (1)(d), (1)(e), and (2) added, p. 1284, §§ 12, 11, effective January 1, 1989. L. 2005: (1)(d.5) added, p. 878, § 2, effective June 1.

39-3.5-105. Listing of tax-deferred property - tax as lien - interest accrual.

  1. If eligibility for deferral of homestead property is established as provided in this article, the county treasurer shall:
    1. Enter in his records a notation that the property is tax-deferred;
      1. Promptly, upon designation of the property as tax-deferred, issue a certificate of deferral, which shall include the name of the taxpayer, the description of the property, the amount of tax deferred, and the year for which the deferral was granted. The certificate shall be recorded in the county records and thereafter sent to the state treasurer. One copy shall be given to the assessor, and one copy shall be retained in the county treasurer's office.
      2. Promptly, upon designation of a mobile home as tax-deferred, the owner of the mobile home shall surrender title to the property to the county clerk and recorder. The county clerk and recorder shall, pursuant to the provisions of article 29 of title 38, C.R.S., make application with the department of revenue for issuance of a new certificate of title with a record of the lien of the state treasurer. This procedure shall be followed for each subsequent year that the property is deferred. The county treasurer shall issue a certificate of deferral, which shall include the name of the taxpayer, the description of the property, the amount deferred, and the tax year for which the deferral was granted, and shall send such certificate to the state treasurer. One copy shall be given to the county assessor, and one copy shall be retained in the county treasurer's office. Upon satisfaction of said lien, the state treasurer shall release the lien from said title.
  2. Notwithstanding the requirements of section 39-1-119 (1), if a person holding escrow funds for the payment of ad valorem taxes receives a copy of the certificate of deferral relating to any tax-deferred property, he shall, no later than thirty days after receiving said certificate, refund to the owner of said property all funds held in escrow for the payment of ad valorem taxes on said property which have been deferred.
  3. Until otherwise required by this article, the county treasurer shall, in subsequent years, continue to list the property as tax-deferred in the manner provided in subsection (1) of this section.
    1. The lien for deferred taxes and interest shall attach on the date of recordation of the certificate for deferral, shall be junior to any mortgage or deed of trust recorded prior to the date of recording of such certificate, shall have priority over all liens attaching subsequent to the date of recording of such certificate, and shall not be foreclosed except as provided in sections 39-3.5-110 to 39-3.5-112.
    2. The lien for deferred taxes and interest for 1978 deferred taxes shall attach on the date of recordation of the certificate of deferral, shall be junior to any mortgage or deed of trust recorded prior to the date of recording of such certificate, shall have priority over all liens attaching subsequent to the date of recording of such certificate, and shall not be foreclosed except as provided in sections 39-3.5-110 to 39-3.5-112.
    1. Repealed.
    2. On and after May 1, 1999, interest shall accrue on all taxes deferred pursuant to deferrals claimed prior to the 1999 calendar year at the rate of seven percent per annum until the date on which such taxes are paid. Interest shall accrue on all taxes deferred pursuant to deferrals claimed on and after January 1, 1999, but prior to January 1, 2001, at the rate of seven percent per annum, beginning May 1 of the calendar year in which the deferral is claimed, until the date on which such taxes are paid.
    3. Interest shall accrue on all taxes deferred pursuant to all deferrals claimed on and after January 1, 2001, at a rate equivalent to the rate per annum on the most recently issued ten-year United States treasury note, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one percent, as reported by the "Wall Street Journal", as of February 1 of the calendar year in which such deferral is claimed. Interest shall accrue on taxes deferred at the rate specified in this paragraph beginning May 1 of the calendar year in which the deferral is claimed until the date on which such taxes are paid.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 473, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: Entire section R&RE, p. 1412, § 4, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (1)(b) amended, p. 1284, § 13, effective January 1, 1989. L. 98: (5) amended, p. 679, § 1, effective August 5. L. 2000: (5)(b) amended and (5)(c) added, p. 905, § 1, effective May 25.

Editor's note: Subsection (5)(a)(II) provided for the repeal of subsection (5)(a), effective May 1, 1999. (See L. 98, p. 679 .)

39-3.5-105.5. Loan of state moneys to taxpayers.

  1. Upon approval by the state treasurer of a taxpayer's application to participate in the property tax deferral program, the state treasurer shall make a loan to the taxpayer in the amount certified as deferred in the taxpayer's certificate of deferral. The loan shall be disbursed to a county treasurer on behalf of the taxpayer pursuant to section 39-3.5-106 and shall be made from the moneys on deposit in the state treasury that are not immediately required to be disbursed.
  2. Interest on a loan for property tax deferral shall accrue at the rate specified in section 39-3.5-105 (5). The interest shall accrue beginning April 30 of the calendar year in which the deferral is claimed until the date on which such loan is repaid.

Source: L. 2002: Entire section added, p. 637, § 1, effective July 1.

39-3.5-105.7. Prior deferrals to be treated as loans.

All deferred real property tax paid by the state treasurer to a county treasurer prior to July 1, 2002, shall be reclassified as an investment in a loan to a taxpayer that was disbursed to a county treasurer on behalf of the taxpayer, and all provisions of this article shall apply to the loan.

Source: L. 2002: Entire section added, p. 637, § 1, effective July 1.

39-3.5-106. State treasurer to pay county treasurer an amount equivalent to deferred taxes.

  1. Pursuant to section 39-3.5-105.5, the state treasurer shall loan the amount certified as deferred in the certificate of deferral to a taxpayer deferring property taxes under this article. By April 30, 2003, and by each April 30 thereafter, the state treasurer shall pay the amount of each taxpayer's loan to the county treasurer in which the taxpayer's homestead property is located. The total amount paid by the state treasurer shall be distributed by the county treasurer in the same manner the tax would have been if regularly paid.
  2. The state treasurer shall maintain an account for each tax-deferred property and shall accrue interest, beginning May 1 of the calendar year in which the deferral was claimed, on the amount certified as deferred in the certificate of deferral. The state treasurer shall insure that each account for tax-deferred property complies with this article.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 474, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: (2) R&RE, p. 1413, § 5, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (2) amended, p. 1285, § 14, effective January 1, 1989. L. 91: (1) and (2) amended, p. 1952, § 1, effective January 1, 1992. L. 2002: (1) amended, p. 638, § 2, effective July 1.

39-3.5-107. Repayment of loans - release of liens - disposition of payments.

  1. On and after the date of payment by the state treasurer to the county treasurer as provided in section 39-3.5-106, the right to receive repayment of a loan for deferred taxes and to enforce the lien created by deferral shall be vested in the state treasurer.
  2. If repayment of a loan for deferred taxes is tendered to the county treasurer, he or she shall accept payment, give a receipt therefor, and forthwith transmit the money collected to the state treasurer.
  3. Promptly upon receiving repayment of a loan for deferred taxes, the state treasurer shall issue a release of the deferred tax lien, which release shall be given or sent to the person making payment. Copies of the release shall be sent to the treasurer and the assessor.
  4. All interest received in payment for a loan for deferred taxes shall be credited to the general fund by the state treasurer.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 474, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 638, § 3, effective July 1.

39-3.5-108. Notice to taxpayer regarding duty to claim deferral annually.

At the time the treasurer sends the annual real property tax notice to any taxpayer who has claimed a deferral of property taxes in the previous calendar year, he shall enclose a deferral notice. The deferral notice shall be substantially in the following form:

To: (name of taxpayer) If you want to defer the collection of ad valorem property taxes on your homestead for the assessment year ending on December 31, , you must file a claim for deferral not later than April 1, , in the office of the county treasurer. Forms for filing such claims are available at the county treasurer's office. If you fail to file your claim for deferral on or before April 1, , your real property taxes will be due and payable in accordance with the schedule set out in the enclosed tax notice. If you change your permanent address at any time during the assessment year ending on December 31, , you must notify the county assessor promptly.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 474, § 1, effective February 28, 1979.

39-3.5-109. Failure to receive notices.

Failure to receive the notice provided for in this article is not a defense in any proceeding for the collection of taxes or for the foreclosure of a tax lien. The treasurer is not personally liable for failure to give such notices.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 475, § 1, effective February 28, 1979.

39-3.5-110. Events requiring repayment of loans - notice to state treasurer.

  1. All loans for deferred real property taxes, including accrued interest, shall become payable subject to sections 39-3.5-111 and 39-3.5-112 when:
    1. The taxpayer who claimed the tax deferral dies;
    2. The property on which the taxes were deferred is sold or becomes subject to a contract of sale, or title to the property is transferred to someone other than the taxpayer who claimed the tax deferral;
    3. The property is no longer the homestead of the taxpayer who claimed the deferral, except in the case of a taxpayer required to be absent from such tax-deferred property by reason of ill health;
    4. The tax-deferred property no longer meets the requirements of section 39-3.5-103 (1)(c) or (1)(f);
    5. The location of the tax-deferred mobile home has changed either within the county or to another county.
  2. When the assessor or treasurer has reason to believe any of the circumstances enumerated in this section has occurred, he shall promptly notify the state treasurer.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 475, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: (1)(d) amended, p. 1413, § 6, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: (1)(d) amended and (1)(e) added, p. 1285, § 15, effective January 1, 1989. L. 2002: IP(1) amended, p. 638, § 4, effective July 1.

39-3.5-111. Time for payment - delinquencies.

  1. Whenever any of the circumstances listed in section 39-3.5-110 occurs:
    1. No further tax deferrals may be claimed on the property until all loans for unpaid taxes, including previously deferred taxes and interest, have been paid.
    2. All loans for deferred taxes and accrued interest shall be due and payable ninety days after the circumstance occurs, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section and in section 39-3.5-112.
  2. Any provision of this section to the contrary notwithstanding, when the taxpayer dies a loan for deferred taxes and accrued interest shall be due and payable one year after the taxpayer's death.
  3. If a loan for deferred taxes and accrued interest is not paid on the due date, such amounts are delinquent as of that date, and the state treasurer shall foreclose the deferred tax lien.
  4. Foreclosure by the state treasurer of deferred tax liens shall be in the same manner as provided by law for the foreclosure of judgment liens. At the foreclosure sale, the state treasurer or his representative shall bid on behalf of the state of Colorado the amount of the deferred tax lien.
  5. If the owner of the tax-deferred property elects to do so, he or she may convey the property to the state of Colorado in lieu of paying a loan for deferred taxes and accrued interest. Upon completion of such conveyance, all deferred tax liens upon the property shall be extinguished, and all liability for payment of a loan for deferred taxes and accrued interest shall be released.
  6. The lien for deferred taxes shall be subject to and may be extinguished in a proper foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust recorded prior to the date of recording of the certificate of tax deferral. In any such foreclosure, any notice that is required to be sent to the state by reason of the state's holding of a lien for deferred taxes shall be sent to the state treasurer. All other procedural matters for such foreclosure, including notice and time limits, shall be as provided in the law pursuant to which the foreclosure is brought.
  7. Whenever the state forecloses a lien for deferred taxes, the interest in the property obtained thereby shall be subject to foreclosure proceedings by the holder of a mortgage or deed of trust recorded prior to the date of recording of the certificate of tax deferral.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 475, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: (4) amended and (6) and (7) added, p 1666, § 139, effective July 19; (1)(b) amended and (5) added, p. 1413, § 7, effective January 1, 1980. L. 2002: (1), (2), (3), and (5) amended, p. 638, § 5, effective July 1.

39-3.5-112. Election by spouse to continue tax deferral.

  1. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 39-3.5-110, when one of the circumstances listed in section 39-3.5-110 (1)(a) or (1)(c) occurs, the spouse of the taxpayer may elect to continue the property in its tax-deferred status if:
    1. The spouse of the taxpayer is or will be sixty years of age or older when the circumstance occurs; and
    2. The property is the homestead of the spouse of the taxpayer and meets the requirements of section 39-3.5-103 (1)(b) and (1)(c).

    1. (1.5) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 39-3.5-110 (1)(a), when a taxpayer who claimed a tax deferral pursuant to this article 3.5 dies, the loan for deferred real property taxes, including accrued interest, shall not become payable if:
      1. The taxpayer was a person called into military service or was a person eligible for deferral under section 39-3.5-102 (1)(c);
      2. The taxpayer is survived by a spouse; and
      3. The property is the homestead of the surviving spouse and meets the requirements of section 39-3.5-103 (1)(b) and (1)(c).
    2. If paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5) applies, a loan for deferred real property taxes, including accrued interest, shall become payable when the spouse of the taxpayer dies, in addition to the events set forth in section 39-3.5-110.
  2. The election granted under subsection (1) of this section shall be filed in the same manner as a claim for deferral is filed under section 39-3.5-102, not later than ninety days from the date the circumstance occurs. Thereafter, the property shall continue to be treated as tax-deferred property, and the county treasurer and state treasurer shall withdraw any action taken under section 39-3.5-111. When the property has been continued in its tax-deferred status by the spouse of the taxpayer, the spouse may continue the property in its tax-deferred status in subsequent years by filing a claim, as provided in section 39-3.5-104, annually if the property continues to be eligible for tax-deferred status.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 475, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: IP(1) and (2) amended, p. 1414, § 8, effective January 1, 1980. L. 2005: (1.5) added, p. 878, § 3, effective June 1. L. 2021: IP(1.5)(a) and (1.5)(a)(I) amended, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1810, § 8, effective June 23.

39-3.5-113. Voluntary repayment of loans for deferred tax.

  1. Subject to subsection (2) of this section, all or part of a loan for deferred taxes and accrued interest may, at any time, be paid by the taxpayer, his or her spouse, guardian, conservator, attorney-in-fact, personal representative, next of kin, heir-at-law, or child, or any person having or claiming a legal or equitable interest in the property. If the deferred tax lien is paid, in whole or in part, by a mortgagee or the beneficiary of a deed of trust or seller under contract, the amount paid may be added to the unpaid balance of the mortgage or deed of trust but shall be added to the last payment due under said mortgage or deed of trust or contract, without amortization.
  2. Any payment made under this section shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to a loan for deferred taxes. Such payment does not affect the deferred tax status of the property. Voluntary payment does not give the person paying the taxes any interest in the property.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 476, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 639, § 6, effective July 1.

39-3.5-114. Deferred tax certificates not to be included in reserve or surplus. (Repealed)

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 476, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 2002: Entire section repealed, p. 639, § 7, effective July 1.

39-3.5-115. Limitations on effect of article.

Nothing in this article is intended to or shall be construed to prevent the collection, by foreclosure or otherwise, of personal property or other taxes which become a lien against tax-deferred property.

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 476, § 1, effective February 28, 1979.

39-3.5-116. Deed or contract clauses preventing application for deferral prohibited - clauses void. (Repealed)

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 476, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: Entire section repealed, p. 1414, § 11, effective January 1, 1980.

39-3.5-117. Report. (Repealed)

Source: L. 78: Entire article added, p. 477, § 1, effective February 28, 1979. L. 79: Entire section amended, p. 1414, § 9, effective January 1, 1980. L. 88: Entire section amended, p. 1308, § 2, effective May 29. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 2182, § 53, effective June 2. L. 2002: Entire section repealed, p. 862, § 4, effective August 7.

39-3.5-118. Emergency property tax deferral for depositors of troubled industrial banks. (Repealed)

Source: L. 88: Entire section added, p. 1307, § 1, effective May 29.

Editor's note: Subsection (7) provided for the repeal of this section, effective June 30, 1990. (See L. 88, p. 1307 .)

39-3.5-119. Release of information identifying individuals claiming deferral.

  1. Notwithstanding the provisions of part 2 of article 72 of title 24, C.R.S., or any other provision of law to the contrary, county treasurers and the state treasurer shall deny requests from individuals, corporations, or other private entities to inspect or produce the names, addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, or other information identifying individuals who claim deferrals pursuant to this article.
  2. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit individuals from examining records recorded in county records by the county clerk and recorder nor shall it be construed to prohibit the disclosure of information:
    1. Required in connection with granting or denying a claim for deferral;
    2. Required in connection with an administrative, judicial, or other legal proceeding;
    3. Required in connection with the conveyance, sale, or encumbrance of a specific property;
    4. When the information is contained in a statistical compilation or other informational summary that does not disclose individual identifying information; or
    5. When the individual claiming the exemption has agreed to the disclosure.

Source: L. 2001: Entire section added, p. 296, § 1, effective August 8.

39-3.5-120. Expansion of deferral program - consultation - repeal.

  1. The governor's office, in consultation with the state treasurer, shall commission a study of the property tax deferral program created in this article 3.5 and make recommendations for possible changes to the program to the general assembly by January 1, 2022. The study shall explore best practices to structure and administer a low-interest loan program to assist qualifying homeowners in paying annual property taxes on their principal residence. The study shall include, but not be limited to, estimated participation rates, cash-flow analysis, estimated average loan size, estimated loan duration and whether duration should be limited, estimated secured debt for primary residences, income-based eligibility alternatives, a market analysis for the state to securitize the debt, an estimate of the impact an expanded program will have on the state's annual budget, and projected costs of implementation, including costs for technology and staff, for the state treasurer and county treasurers.
  2. This section is repealed, effective July 1, 2022.

Source: L. 2021: Entire section added, (SB 21-293), ch. 301, p. 1810, § 9, effective June 23.

ARTICLE 3.7 PROPERTY TAX WORK-OFF PROGRAM FOR THE ELDERLY

Section

39-3.7-101. Definitions.

As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Homestead" means the owner-occupied residence of the taxpayer and includes owner-occupied units in a condominium, townhouse, or similar structure.

    (1.5) "Person with a disability" means any person with a physical impairment or an intellectual and developmental disability as defined in section 25.5-10-202, C.R.S.

  2. "Property tax work-off program" means any program established pursuant to the provisions of this article.
  3. "Real property taxes" means all ad valorem taxes levied on a homestead, including special assessments and all other charges which are recoverable, by law, at the annual real estate tax sale.
  4. "Taxing entity" means any county, city and county, city, town, school district, or special district within the state of Colorado.

Source: L. 91: Entire article added, p. 1995, § 1, effective April 11. L. 2003: (1.5) added, p. 841, § 1, effective August 6. L. 2013: (1.5) amended, (HB 13-1314), ch. 323, p. 1813, § 54, effective March 1, 2014.

39-3.7-102. Property tax work-off program - creation - terms.

  1. Any taxing entity that levies and collects real property taxes may establish a property tax work-off program in accordance with this article 3.7 that allows any taxpayer who is sixty years of age or older, is a first responder with a permanent occupational disability as defined in section 33-4-104.5 (2), or who is otherwise a person with a disability to perform work for the taxing entity in lieu of the payment of any real property taxes, or any portion thereof, due and owing on the homestead of such taxpayer for any given property tax year.
  2. In order to qualify for participation in any property tax work-off program created pursuant to the provisions of this article, the following requirements shall be satisfied at the time the application is filed and so long thereafter as the taxpayer may participate in such property tax work-off program:
    1. The property on which the property taxes are due and owing is the homestead of the taxpayer making application.
    2. The taxpayer making application must, singly or jointly with another person residing in the homestead, own the fee simple estate or be purchasing the fee simple estate under a recorded instrument of sale; except that nonresidence of the joint owner in the homestead because of ill health of the joint owner shall not prevent the taxpayer from meeting the requirements of this paragraph (b).
    3. The property on which the property taxes are due and owing is not income-producing.
  3. The number of hours of work to be performed by a taxpayer pursuant to any property tax work-off program shall be based upon the calculation of the amount of property taxes, or portion thereof, to be worked off divided by the minimum wage as set by federal law.
  4. A property tax work-off program shall be created upon the adoption of a resolution or ordinance, whichever is appropriate, by the governing body of such taxing entity. Such resolution or ordinance shall be in accordance with the provisions of this article and shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: Procedures for application for participation in such property tax work-off program; the maximum number of taxpayers allowed to participate in such property tax work-off program; procedures for verification of work performed; procedures for the issuance of checks to taxpayers for the amount of property tax worked off by such taxpayers pursuant to such property tax work-off program; and such other provisions which such taxing entity deems reasonable and necessary for the implementation and operation of such property tax work-off program.

    (4.5) For each property tax year in which a taxpayer participates in a property tax work-off program pursuant to the provisions of this section, the taxing entity which has established such program shall issue a check or checks to such taxpayer which shall be made payable only to the appropriate county treasurer. The taxpayer shall be responsible for the delivery of the check or checks to the county treasurer in order for such amount to be credited to the property tax which is due and owing on the homestead of the taxpayer for such property tax year.

  5. Any taxing entity which establishes a property tax work-off program pursuant to the provisions of this article shall make information regarding such program available to the taxpayers of the taxing entity.
  6. Any taxpayer who is a first responder with a permanent occupational disability as defined in section 33-4-104.5 (2) or who is otherwise a person with a disability, and who applies to participate in a property tax work-off program pursuant to this article 3.7 shall, upon application, submit either a signed and dated letter from the fire and police pension association verifying that the taxpayer is a first responder with a permanent occupational disability or a signed and dated letter from a Colorado licensed health-care professional verifying that the taxpayer is a person with a disability. Any taxing entity that establishes a property tax work-off program pursuant to this section has the authority to further define the term "person with a disability" for purposes of determining eligibility for the property tax work-off program. The definition may restrict, but must not expand, the class of individuals who are eligible to participate in the property tax work-off program pursuant to this section.

Source: L. 91: Entire article added, p. 1995, § 1, effective April 11. L. 92: (4) amended and (4.5) added, p. 2242, § 1, effective March 16. L. 2003: (1) amended and (6) added, p. 841, § 2, effective August 6. L. 2019: (1) and (6) amended, (HB 19-1080), ch. 222, p. 2251, § 3, effective August 2.

ARTICLE 3.9 OPTIONAL NONGAMING PROPERTY TAX DEFERRAL PLAN

39-3.9-101 to 39-3.9-106. (Repealed)

Editor's note:

  1. This article was added in 1993 and was not amended prior to its repeal in 1996. For the text of this article prior to 1996, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.
  2. Section 39-3.9-106 provided for the repeal of this article, effective December 31, 1996. (See L. 93, p. 346 .)

Valuation and Taxation

ARTICLE 4 VALUATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Editor's note: This article was repealed and reenacted in 1964. For historical information concerning the repeal and reenactment, see the editor's note before the article 1 heading.

Section

39-4-101. Definitions.

As used in this article 4, unless the context otherwise requires:

  1. "Aircraft" means any contrivance now known or hereafter invented, used, or designed for navigation or flight through the air and designed to carry at least one person.
  2. "Airline company" means any operator who engages in the carriage by aircraft of persons or property as a common carrier for compensation or hire, or the carriage of mail, or any aircraft operator who operates regularly between two or more points and publishes a flight schedule. "Airline company" shall not include operators whose aircraft are all certified for a gross takeoff weight of twelve thousand five hundred pounds or less and who do not engage in scheduled or mail carriage service.

    (2.3) "Biomass energy facility" means a new facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2010, that uses real and personal property, including leaseholds and easements, to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electrical or mechanical energy by combusting only biomass or biosolids derived from the treatment of wastewater and that is not primarily designed to supply electricity for consumption on site.

    (2.4) "Clean energy resource" has the same meaning as set forth in section 40-2-125.5 (2)(b).

    (2.5) Repealed.

    (2.6) "Energy storage system" means commercially available technology that is capable of retaining electricity, storing the energy for a period of time, and delivering the electricity after storage by chemical, thermal, mechanical, or other means. "Energy storage system" does not include a solar energy facility, as defined in subsection (3.5) of this section, or a wind energy facility, as defined in subsection (4) of this section.

    (2.7) "Geothermal energy facility" means a new facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2010, that uses real and personal property, including but not limited to leaseholds and easements, to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electrical or mechanical energy by harnessing the heat energy of groundwater or the ground and that is not primarily designed to supply electricity for consumption on site.

    1. "Public utility" means, for property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, every sole proprietorship, firm, limited liability company, partnership, association, company, or corporation, and the trustees or receivers thereof, whether elected or appointed, that does business in this state as a railroad company, airline company, electric company, small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, geothermal energy facility, biomass energy facility, wind energy facility, solar energy facility, energy storage system, clean energy resource, rural electric company, telephone company, telegraph company, gas company, gas pipeline carrier company, domestic water company selling at retail except nonprofit domestic water companies, pipeline company, coal slurry pipeline, or private car line company.
    2. On and after January 1, 2010, for purposes of this article 4, "public utility" does not include any affiliate or subsidiary of a sole proprietorship, firm, limited liability company, partnership, association, company, or corporation of any type of company described in subsection (3)(a) of this section that is not doing business in the state primarily as a railroad company, airline company, electric company, small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, geothermal energy facility, biomass energy facility, wind energy facility, solar energy facility, energy storage system, clean energy resource, rural electric company, telephone company, telegraph company, gas company, gas pipeline carrier company, domestic water company selling at retail except nonprofit domestic water companies, pipeline company, coal slurry pipeline, or private car line company. Valuation and taxation of any such affiliate or subsidiary of a public utility as defined in subsection (3)(a) of this section shall be assessed pursuant to article 5 of this title 39.

    1. (3.3) (a) "Small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility" means a new facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2010, that uses real and personal property, including but not limited to leaseholds and easements, to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electrical or mechanical energy by harnessing the kinetic energy of water, that is not primarily designed to supply electricity for consumption on site, and that is:
      1. A new facility that is a small facility that has a nameplate rating of ten megawatts or less; or
      2. A new facility that has a nameplate rating of more than ten megawatts and that:
        1. Is an addition to water infrastructure such as a reservoir, a ditch, or a pipeline that existed before January 1, 2010;
        2. Does not result in any change in the quantity or timing of diversions or releases for purposes of peak power generation;
        3. Includes measures to prevent fish mortality in facilities on on-stream reservoirs and natural waterways; and
        4. Does not cause any violation of state water quality standards when operated; or
      3. A new facility that has a nameplate rating of more than ten megawatts and that:
        1. Is placed into production as part of new water infrastructure such as a reservoir, a ditch, or a pipeline constructed on or after January 1, 2010, and operated for primary beneficial uses of water other than solely for production of electricity;
        2. Includes measures to prevent fish mortality in facilities on reservoirs and natural waterways; and
        3. Does not cause any violation of state water quality standards when operated.
    2. For purposes of this subsection (3.3), "new facility" includes a combined facility that is a combination of a facility placed in production before January 1, 2010, that uses real and personal property to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electric or mechanical energy by harnessing the kinetic energy of water and that is not primarily designed to supply energy for consumption on site and an addition or energy efficiency improvement to the facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2010, if the addition or efficiency improvement increases the electrical or mechanical energy-producing capacity of the combined facility by at least twenty-five percent over the capacity of the facility placed in production before January 1, 2010, alone.

    (3.5) "Solar energy facility" means a new facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2009, that uses real and personal property, including but not limited to one or more solar energy devices, as defined in section 38-32.5-100.3 (2), leaseholds, and easements, to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electrical, thermal, or mechanical energy in excess of two megawatts by harnessing the radiant energy of the sun, including any connected device for which the primary purpose is to store energy, and that is not primarily designed to supply electricity for consumption on site.

  3. "Wind energy facility" means a new facility first placed in production on or after January 1, 2006, that uses property, real and personal, including one or more wind turbines, leaseholds, and easements, to generate and deliver to the interconnection meter any source of electrical or mechanical energy in excess of two megawatts by harnessing the kinetic energy of the wind, including any connected device for which the primary purpose is to store energy.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 688, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-1. L. 76: Entire section amended, p. 768, § 1, effective April 26; entire section amended, p. 759, § 16, effective July 1, 1977. L. 81: (2.5) added and (3) amended, p. 1854, §§ 3, 4, effective January 1, 1982; (3) amended, p. 1847, § 1, effective January 1, 1982. L. 82: (2.5) amended, p. 628, § 41, effective April 2. L. 83: (2.5) and (3) amended, p. 1496, § 3, effective April 28. L. 84: (2.5) and (3) amended, p. 989, § 2, effective February 23; (2.5) and (3) amended, p. 997, § 2, effective May 22. L. 90: (3) amended, p. 450, § 27, effective April 18. L. 2000: (3) amended, p. 1738, § 2, effective June 1. L. 2006: (3) amended and (4) added, p. 889, § 1, effective May 9. L. 2008: (4) amended, p. 1319, § 2, effective May 27. L. 2009: (3) amended and (3.5) added, (SB 09-177), ch. 186, p. 812, § 1, effective April 22. L. 2010: (3) amended and (3.3) added, (SB 10-019), ch. 382, p. 1784, § 1, effective June 8; (2.3) added and (3) amended, (SB 10-177), ch. 392, p. 1862, § 3, effective August 11; (2.4) added and (3) amended, (SB 10-174), ch. 189, p. 813, § 8, effective August 11. L. 2021: IP, (2.4), (3), (3.5), and (4) amended and (2.6) and (2.7) added, (SB 21-020), ch. 51, p. 215, § 1, effective September 7.

Editor's note:

  1. Subsection (2.5) provided for the repeal of subsection (2.5), effective January 1, 1987. (See L. 84, p. 989 .)
  2. Amendments to this section by House Bill 76-1235 and House Bill 76-1025 were harmonized. Amendments to subsection (3) by House Bill 81-1309 and Senate Bill 81-025 were harmonized. Amendments to subsections (2.5) and (3) by House Bill 84-1051 and Senate Bill 84-214 were harmonized. Amendments to subsection (3) by Senate Bill 10-019, Senate Bill 10-174, and Senate Bill 10-177 were harmonized.

Cross references: For the legislative intent contained in the 2008 act amending subsection (4), see section 9 of chapter 302, Session Laws of Colorado 2008.

ANNOTATION

Since the general assembly failed to define "telephone company" as used in the definition of "public utility" in this section, it must be assumed that the general assembly intended to give the term its usual and ordinary meaning. Transponder Corp. of Denver v. Propty. Tax Adm'r, 681 P.2d 499 ( Colo. 1984 ); U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 ( Colo. 1986 ).

Because the company directly facilities two-way communication between a significant number of unrelated persons or businesses, the company is a "telephone company". U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

"Public utilities". There is no evidence that the general assembly intended to limit its definition of "public utility" for property tax purposes to those companies that are regulated monopolies. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

Because the petitioner was doing business as a "telephone company" within the state of Colorado it was a public utility subject to unitary valuation for property tax assessment. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 ( Colo. 1986 ).

A nonfacilities-based reseller of long distance telephone services is a telephone company within the meaning of subsection (3)(a). OPEX Commc'ns, Inc. v. Prop. Tax Adm'r, 166 P.3d 225 (Colo. App. 2007).

Applied in State Pers. Bd. v. District Court, 637 P.2d 333 (Colo. App. 1981).

39-4-102. Valuation of public utilities - legislative declaration - definition.

  1. The administrator shall determine the actual value of the operating property and plant of each public utility as a unit, giving consideration to the following factors and assigning such weight to each of such factors as in the administrator's judgment will secure a just value of such public utility as a unit:
    1. The tangible property comprising its plant, whether the same is situated within this state or both within and without this state, exclusive of any tangible property situated without this state which is not directly connected with the business in which such public utility is engaged within this state;
    2. Its intangibles, such as special privileges, franchises, contract rights and obligations, and rights-of-way; except that licenses granted by the federal communications commission to a wireless carrier, as defined in section 29-11-101, C.R.S., shall not be considered, nor shall the value of such licenses be reflected, in the administrator's valuation of the carrier's tangible property;
    3. Its gross and net operating revenues during a reasonable period of time not to exceed the most recent five-year period, capitalized at indicative rates;
    4. The average market value of its outstanding securities during the preceding calendar year, if such market value is determinable;
      1. When determining the actual value of a renewable energy facility that primarily produces more than two megawatts of alternating current electricity, the administrator shall:
        1. Consider the additional incremental cost per kilowatt of the construction of the renewable energy facility, taking into account the nameplate capacity of any energy storage system in addition to generation capacity, over that of the construction cost of a comparable nonrenewable energy facility, inclusive of the cost of all property required to generate and deliver energy to the interconnection meter, that primarily produces alternating current electricity to be an investment cost and shall not include the additional incremental cost in the valuation of the facility; and
        2. Not add value to a renewable energy facility for any renewable energy credits created by the production of alternating current electricity.
      2. For purposes of this paragraph (e), "renewable energy" has the meaning provided in section 40-1-102 (11), C.R.S., but shall not include energy generated from a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility.
        1. For purposes of determining the actual value of a renewable energy facility as specified in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (e), an owner or operator of a facility shall provide a copy of the facility's current power purchase agreement to the administrator by April 1 of each assessment year as an attachment to the statement required as specified in section 39-4-103 (1); except that, if a copy of the current power purchase agreement was previously provided either by the owner or operator or by the purchaser of power and there is no material change in the facility's current power purchase agreement, the owner or operator of a facility shall not be required to provide a copy of the agreement.
        2. If the owner or operator of a facility does not provide a copy of the facility's current power purchase agreement as specified in sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph (III), the administrator shall have the authority to request a copy of the current power purchase agreement from the purchaser of power generated at the facility; except that, if a copy of the current power purchase agreement was previously provided either by the owner or operator or by the purchaser of power and there is no material change in the facility's current power purchase agreement, the purchaser of power shall not be required to provide a copy of the agreement.
        3. All power purchase agreements provided to the administrator pursuant to this subparagraph (III) shall be considered private documents and shall be available only to the administrator and the employees of the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs.

    (1.5) The administrator shall determine the actual value of a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility as follows:

    1. The general assembly hereby declares that initial consideration by the administrator of the cost approach and market approach to the appraisal of a wind energy facility or a solar energy facility results in valuations that are neither uniform nor just and equal because of wide variations in the production of energy from wind turbines and solar energy devices, as defined in section 38-32.5-100.3 (2), because of the uncertainty of wind and sunlight available for energy production, and because constructing a wind energy facility or a solar energy facility is significantly more expensive than constructing any other utility production facility. The general assembly further declares that it is also appropriate to initially value small or low impact hydroelectric energy facilities, geothermal energy facilities, and biomass energy facilities, which also have high construction costs relative to their ongoing operational costs, using the income approach. Therefore, in the absence of preponderant evidence shown by the administrator that the use of the cost approach and market approach results in uniform and just and equal valuation, a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility shall be initially valued based solely upon the income approach.
      1. For a property tax year that a tax factor applies, the actual value of a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility is an amount equal to a tax factor times the selling price at the interconnection meter. For a property tax year that a tax factor does not apply, the administrator shall determine the actual value of the facility giving appropriate consideration to the cost, income, and market approaches; except that the actual value shall not exceed the depreciated value floor calculated using the cost basis method of taxation as determined by the administrator for a renewable energy facility pursuant to subsection (1)(e) of this section.
      2. As used in this article, "interconnection meter" means the meter located at the point of delivery of energy to the purchaser.
      3. As used in this paragraph (b), "selling price at the interconnection meter" means the gross taxable revenues realized by the taxpayer from the sale of energy at the interconnection meter.
      4. As used in this subsection (1.5)(b), "tax factor" means a factor annually established by the administrator. For a facility that begins generating energy before January 1, 2021, the tax factor is a number that when applied to the selling price at the interconnection meter results in approximately the same tax revenue over a twenty-year period on a nominal dollar basis that would have been collected using the cost basis method of taxation as determined by the administrator for a renewable energy facility pursuant to subsection (1)(e) of this section. For a facility that begins generating energy on or after January 1, 2021, the tax factor is a number that, when applied to the selling price at the interconnection meter, results in approximately the same tax revenue over a thirty-year period on a nominal dollar basis that would have been collected using the cost basis method of taxation as determined by the administrator for a renewable energy facility pursuant to subsection (1)(e) of this section. After the first twenty or thirty years of a facility's life, as applicable, a tax factor is not applied. For a renewable energy facility that begins generating energy before January 1, 2012, the administrator shall include only the cost of all property required to generate and deliver renewable energy to the interconnection meter that does not exceed the cost of property required to generate nonrenewable energy. For a renewable energy facility that begins generating energy on or after January 1, 2012, the administrator shall include only the cost of all property required to generate, store, and deliver renewable energy to the interconnection meter that does not exceed the cost of property required to generate and deliver nonrenewable energy to the interconnection meter.
      5. For purposes of calculating the tax factor as required in subparagraph (IV) of this paragraph (b), an owner or operator of a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility shall provide a copy of the small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility's, geothermal energy facility's, biomass energy facility's, wind energy facility's, or solar energy facility's current power purchase agreement to the administrator by April 1 of each assessment year. The administrator shall also have the authority to request a copy of the current power purchase agreement from the purchaser of power generated at a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility. All agreements provided to the administrator pursuant to this subparagraph (V) shall be considered private documents and shall be available only to the administrator and the employees of the division of property taxation in the department of local affairs.
    2. The location of a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility on real property shall not affect the classification of that real property for purposes of determining the actual value of that real property as provided in section 39-1-103.
    3. Pursuant to section 39-3-118.5, no actual value for any personal property used in a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, a wind energy facility, or a solar energy facility shall be assigned until the personal property is first put into use by the facility. If any item of personal property is used in the facility and is subsequently taken out of service so that no small or low impact hydroelectric energy, geothermal energy, biomass energy, wind energy, or solar energy is produced from that facility for the preceding calendar year, no actual value shall be assigned to that item of more than five percent of the installed cost of the item for that assessment year.
    4. The administrator shall determine the actual value of an energy storage system or clean energy resource in a manner similar to the method used for a small or low impact hydroelectric energy facility, a wind energy facility, a geothermal energy facility, a biomass energy facility, or a solar energy facility under subsection (1)(e) of this section and this subsection (1.5).
  2. If, in the judgment of the administrator, the books and records of any public utility accurately reflect its tangible property, its intangibles, and its earnings within this state during the most recent five-year period, the administrator may determine from such books and records the actual value of its property and plant within this state and need not determine the entire value of its property and plant both within and without this state.
    1. For property tax years 1982 through 1986, there shall be applied to the actual value of each public utility an equalization factor to adjust the actual value for the current year of assessment as determined by the administrator pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section to the public utility's level of value in 1981.
    2. For property tax years commencing on or after January 1, 1987, there shall be applied to the actual value of each public utility an equalization factor to adjust the actual value for the current year of assessment as determined by the administrator pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section to the public utility's level of value in the appropriate year that is prescribed in section 39-1-104 (10.2) and that is used to determine the actual value of properties that are subject to said applicable subsection.
    3. Appraisal procedures, instructions, and factors utilized by the administrator in carrying out the provisions of this section shall be subject to legislative review, the same as rules and regulations, pursuant to section 24-4-103 (8)(d), C.R.S.
    4. The administrator shall certify to the public utility any difference in valuation resulting from the application of this section. Said certification shall be part of the evidence presented in determining rate structures by any applicable rate-setting body.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 688, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-2. L. 67: p. 948, § 12. L. 70: p. 382, § 15. L. 81: (3) added, p. 1847, § 2, effective January 1, 1982. L. 83: (3)(a) and (3)(b) amended, p. 1496, § 4, effective April 28. L. 84: (3)(a) and (3)(b) amended, p. 989, § 3, effective February 23. L. 91: (3)(b) amended, p. 2005, § 4, effective June 6. L. 95: (3)(b) amended, p. 8, § 3, effective March 9. L. 98: (1)(b) amended, p. 1267, § 1, effective June 1. L. 2001: IP(1) amended and (1)(e) added, p. 1523, § 1, effective August 8. L. 2004: (1)(b) amended, p. 1208, § 87, effective August 4. L. 2006: (1)(e) amended and (1.5) added, p. 890, § 2, effective May 9. L. 2008: (1)(e) and (1.5)(b)(V) amended, p. 1319, § 3, effective May 27; (1)(b) amended, p. 685, § 5, effective August 5. L. 2009: (1)(e)(II), IP(1.5), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), (1.5)(b)(IV), (1.5)(b)(V), (1.5)(c), and (1.5)(d) amended, (SB 09-177), ch. 186, p. 813, § 2, effective April 22. L. 2010: (1)(e)(II), IP(1.5), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), (1.5)(b)(V), (1.5)(c), and (1.5)(d) amended, (SB 10-019), ch. 382, p. 1786, § 2, effective June 8; (1)(e)(I)(A) and (1.5)(b)(IV) amended, (HB 10-1431), ch. 372, p. 1743, § 1, effective August 11; (1)(e)(II), IP(1.5), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), (1.5)(b)(V), (1.5)(c), and (1.5)(d) amended, (SB 10-174), ch. 189, p. 814, § 9, effective August 11; (1)(e)(II), IP(1.5), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), (1.5)(b)(V), (1.5)(c), and (1.5)(d) amended, (SB 10-177), ch. 392, p. 1862, § 4, effective August 11. L. 2021: (1)(e)(I)(A), (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), and (1.5)(b)(IV) amended and (1.5)(e) added, (SB 21-020), ch. 51, p. 216, § 2, effective September 7.

Editor's note: Amendments to subsection (1)(e)(II), the introductory portion to subsection (1.5), and subsections (1.5)(a), (1.5)(b)(I), (1.5)(b)(V), (1.5)(c), and (1.5)(d) by Senate Bill 10-019, Senate Bill 10-174, and Senate Bill 10-177 were harmonized.

Cross references: For the legislative intent contained in the 2008 act amending subsections (1)(e) and (1.5)(b)(V), see section 9 of chapter 302, Session Laws of Colorado 2008.

ANNOTATION

Different valuation method for public utilities is constitutional. While a public utility may have a different tax burden compared to a competitor that is not a public utility, this difference does not violate the state and federal equal protection clauses or the uniform taxation clause, art. X, § 3(1)(a), of the state constitution. Qwest v. Colo. Div. of Prop. Taxation, 2013 CO 39, 304 P.3d 217.

No statutory conflict. The requirement of this section that a public utility's intangibles be considered when valuing such utility's operating property and plant as a unit does not necessarily conflict with the general exemption for intangible personal property pursuant to § 39-3-101 (1)(i). U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986) (decided under former law).

Board of assessment appeals was not required, as a matter of law, to include financing costs in the valuation of plaintiff's property. The method by which the property tax administrator arrived at her valuation was authorized under this section. Colo. Interstate Gas Co. v. Huddleston, 28 P.3d 958 (Colo. App. 2000).

Public utility not entitled to the intangible property exemption or the cost cap valuation method. Instead, a public utility must be valued under the factors listed in this section. Qwest v. Colo. Div. of Prop. Taxation, 2013 CO 39, 304 P.3d 217.

"Operating property and plant" includes the tangible property comprising the plant and the intangible rights of the utility that directly contribute to the utility's operations. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

Property taxation of a public utility in Colorado is not precluded simply because the only portion of the public utility's operating property and plant found within this state is the intangible rights derived from rental of telephone circuits. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 ( Colo. 1986 ).

Telephone circuits leased by petitioner from other telecommunication companies in Colorado constituted intangible rights held by a public utility as part of its operating property and plant and as such were property considered in determining petitioner's property tax assessment. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 ( Colo. 1986 ).

Value of the "operating property and plant". The statute reflects the view that the true measure of value of the property of a public utility is its worth as an integrated and operating unit rather than the sum of the values of the various components making up that unit. Therefore, the fact that petitioner's property rights in the circuits leased from other telecommunication companies has no independent market value is not dispositive of such property's assessment value. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

The operating property and plant to be valued as a unit consists of the public utility's property and plant used in carrying on its business. Such valuation also includes intangible rights derived from other property and plant even if owned by a parent company or other subsidiary if they contribute directly to the operation of the public utility as an ongoing concern. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc. v. Huddleston, 981 P.2d 223 (Colo. App. 1999).

The general assembly did not intend to equate "actual value" with "market value". Actual value is not the same as market value and the terms cannot be used interchangeably. Colo. Interstate Gas Co. v. Huddleston, 28 P.3d 958 (Colo. App. 2000).

The general assembly's intent is apparent from its use of the term "actual value" when referring to the overall property value, and use of "market value" to refer only to the value of a public utilities outstanding securities during the calendar year preceding valuation. Colo. Interstate Gas Co. v. Huddleston, 28 P.3d 958 (Colo. App. 2000).

Applied in Salt River Project v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 719 P.2d 368 (Colo. App. 1986).

39-4-103. Schedules of property - confidential records - late filing penalties.

    1. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (a), no later than April 1 of each year, each public utility doing business in this state shall file with the administrator, on a form provided by the administrator, a statement, signed by an officer of such public utility under the penalties of perjury in the second degree, containing such information concerning itself and all of its property, wherever situated, as the administrator may reasonably require for the purpose of determining the actual value of such public utility in this state and for apportioning the valuation for assessment of such public utility among the several counties of this state. Upon good cause shown, the administrator may grant an extension for filing such statement to any public utility. Any extension granted pursuant to this paragraph (a) shall be for a reasonable amount of time as determined by the administrator.
    2. Such statement shall include a specific identification of each and every item of property owned, leased, or used which is not included in the rendition of the operating property and plant and the county in which each item is located.

    1. (1.5) (a) If a public utility fails to complete a statement of property and legally postmark it for return by April 1, the administrator shall impose on such public utility a late filing penalty in the amount of one hundred dollars for each calendar day the statement of property remains delinquent; except that the late filing penalty shall not exceed three thousand dollars. If, by June 1, the public utility continues to be delinquent in filing a statement of property, the administrator shall, in addition to imposing a late filing penalty, determine the actual value of such utility on the basis of the best information available. All late filing penalties shall be credited to the general fund.
    2. If any public utility fails to file a completed statement of property, or includes in a filed statement of property any information concerning the public utility property which is false, erroneous, or misleading, or fails to include in the statement of property any taxable property owned by the public utility, then the administrator may determine the actual value of such taxable property on the basis of the best information available.
    3. If a public utility fails to file a statement of property and does not file a petition or complaint pursuant to section 39-4-108 regarding the actual value of its taxable property as determined on the basis of the best information available pursuant to this subsection (1.5), the public utility shall be deemed to have waived any right to file an abatement or refund petition regarding such actual value pursuant to section 39-10-114.
  1. All such statements filed with the administrator shall be considered private documents and shall be available only to the administrator, the employees of the division of property taxation, assessors, and county treasurers.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 689, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-3. L. 70: p. 382, § 16. L. 72: p. 569, § 50. L. 76: (1) amended, p. 759, § 17, effective July 1, 1977. L. 87: (1.5) added, p. 1404, § 1, effective January 1, 1988. L. 89: (1)(a) amended, p. 1465, § 29, effective January 1, 1990. L. 90: (1.5)(a) amended, p. 1696, § 17, effective June 9. L. 93: (1.5)(a) amended, p. 1687, § 2, effective June 6. L. 96: (1.5)(c) added, p. 650, § 3, effective May 1. L. 2020: (2) amended, (HB 20-1077), ch. 80, p. 325, § 8, effective September 14.

Cross references: For perjury in the second degree and the penalty therefor, see §§ 18-8-503 and 18-1.3-501.

39-4-104. Inspection of records of utility.

The division of property taxation, through the administrator, and its employees, shall have the right at any time, upon demand, to inspect the books, accounts, and records of any public utility doing business in this state for the purpose of verifying the information contained in its filed statement and to examine under oath any officer, employee, or agent of such public utility. Any person making such demand upon a public utility on behalf of the administrator shall produce and exhibit his authority to make such inspection or examination.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 689, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-4. L. 70: p. 382, § 17.

39-4-105. Production of records.

By order or subpoena, the administrator may require the production of any books, accounts, or records of any public utility doing business in this state, or verified copies of the same, for examination, and any public utility failing or refusing to comply with any such order or subpoena shall forfeit and pay to the state the sum of one hundred dollars for each day it so fails or refuses.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 690, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-5. L. 70: p. 383, § 18.

39-4-106. Valuation of utilities - apportionment.

  1. Repealed.
  2. In the specific case of a telegraph company, the administrator shall:
    1. Determine, as of the last day of December of each year, the actual value of such company as a unit, or of its property and plant within this state, in the manner provided in section 39-4-102;
    2. Allocate to this state, if the actual value of such company is determined as a unit, that proportion of such actual value as in his judgment accurately represents the value of the property and plant of such company within this state, utilizing commonly recognized methods of allocation as in his judgment are just and equitable;
    3. Compute the valuation for assessment of such company in this state as provided in section 39-1-104;
    4. Apportion the valuation for assessment of such company in this state among the several counties of this state in such proportion as in his judgment will fairly represent the valuation for assessment within each such county, utilizing commonly recognized methods of apportioning as in his judgment are just and equitable.
  3. In the specific case of a telephone company, the administrator shall:
    1. Determine, as of the last day of December of each year, the actual value of such company as a unit, or of its property and plant within this state, in the manner provided in section 39-4-102;
    2. Allocate to this state, if the actual value of such company is determined as a unit, that proportion of such actual value as in his judgment accurately represents the value of the property and plant of such company within this state, utilizing commonly recognized methods of allocation as in his judgment are just and equitable;
    3. Compute the valuation for assessment of such company in this state as provided in section 39-1-104;
    4. Apportion the valuation for assessment of such company in this state among the several counties of this state in such proportion as in his judgment will fairly represent the valuation for assessment within each such county, utilizing commonly recognized methods of apportioning as in his judgment are just and equitable.
  4. Repealed.
  5. In the specific case of a pipeline company engaged in the transportation of gas, oil, or petroleum products or coal slurry or other coal products in pipelines through or in this state, the administrator shall:
    1. Determine, as of the last day of December of each year, the actual value of the property of such company within this state, either in the manner provided in section 39-4-102 or, with respect to its pipelines, on a diameter per inch per mile basis and its land, improvements, pump and compressor stations, and miscellaneous equipment, wherever situated, being valued separately in the same manner as all other real and personal property;
    2. Compute the valuation for assessment of such company in this state as provided in section 39-1-104;
    3. Apportion the valuation for assessment of such company in this state among the several counties of the state in such proportion as in his judgment will fairly represent the valuation for assessment within each such county, utilizing commonly recognized methods of apportioning as in his judgment shall be just and equitable.
  6. The administrator shall determine the actual value of all other public utilities doing business in this state in the manner provided in section 39-4-102 and shall apportion the valuation for assessment thereof, computed as provided in section 39-1-104, among the several counties of this state in which property of such public utilities is located in such proportion as in his judgment will fairly represent the valuation for assessment within each such county, utilizing commonly recognized methods of apportioning as in his judgment are just and equitable.
    1. In the specific case of a railroad company, the administrator shall:
      1. Determine, as of the last day of December of each year, the actual value of such company as a unit or the actual value of its property and plant within this state, in the manner provided in section 39-4-102;
      2. Ascertain the total mileage of all railroad track of such company, wherever situated, if the actual value of such company is determined as a unit;
      3. Ascertain the total mileage of all railroad track of such company situated within this state and in the several counties thereof;
      4. Ascertain the total mileage of all railroad main track of such company situated within this state and in the several counties thereof;
      5. Allocate to this state, if the actual value of such company is determined as a unit, that proportion of such actual value that the total mileage of all railroad track of such company situated within this state bears to the total mileage of all railroad track of such company, wherever situated;
      6. Compute the valuation for assessment of such company in this state as provided in section 39-1-104;
      7. Apportion the valuation for assessment of such company within this state among the several counties of this state in the proportion that the actual mileage of railroad main track within each such county bears to the total mileage of all railroad main track of such company within this state.
    2. This subsection (7) is effective January 1, 1987.
    1. In the case of cars owned by a sleeping car company, a railroad express company, or a private car line company, the administrator shall:
      1. Ascertain the total railroad track miles made by all such cars within this state and in the several counties thereof during the preceding calendar year;
      2. Determine the actual value of all such cars, using commonly recognized methods of valuation;
      3. Compute the valuation for assessment of all such cars as provided in section 39-1-104;
      4. Apportion the valuation for assessment of all such cars among the several counties of the state in such proportion as in his judgment will fairly represent the valuation for assessment within each such county.
    2. This subsection (8) is effective January 1, 1987.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 690, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-6. L. 70: p. 383, § 19. L. 76: IP(5) amended, p. 768, § 2, effective April 26. L. 81: (1) and (4) repealed, p. 1855, § 7, effective January 1, 1982; (7) and (8) added, p. 1854, § 5, effective January 1, 1987. L. 83: (7)(b) and (8)(b) amended, p. 1497, § 5, effective April 28. L. 84: (7)(b) and (8)(b) amended, p. 990, § 4, effective February 23.

ANNOTATION

No commerce clause violation. Where the utility's intangible property, in-state circuits leased by the utility to transmit calls in and out of state, provides a sufficient nexus between the utility and the state to support a tax, and where the tax was apportioned in the tax administrator's judgment to represent the value of the utility's property and plant within the state, the resulting valuation for assessment did not violate the commerce clause. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

Allocation formula for apportioning the unitary value of a telephone company's property to Colorado. In the absence of a showing of significant prejudice by petitioner, the board's employment of a single factor allocation formula based on gross revenues was in compliance with the tax administrator's statutory charge to apportion fairly the value of the property and plant to represent the value attributable to the state. U.S. Transmission Sys. v. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 715 P.2d 1249 (Colo. 1986).

39-4-107. Statement of valuation to counties.

No later than July 1 in each year, the administrator shall advise both the assessor of each county wherein property of a public utility is located and the public utility itself of the valuation of such public utility in such county, and such amount shall be entered on the tax roll of such county by the assessor in the same manner as though determined by the assessor.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 692, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-7. L. 70: p. 384, § 20. L. 89: Entire section amended, p. 1465, § 30, effective June 7. L. 93: Entire section amended, p. 1687, § 3, effective June 6. L. 96: Entire section amended, p. 719, § 3, effective May 22.

39-4-108. Complaint - hearing - decision.

  1. Any public utility, being of the opinion that the actual value of its property and plant as determined by the administrator is illegal, erroneous, or not uniform with the actual value of like property similarly situated, as determined by the administrator, may, no later than July 15, file a petition or complaint with the administrator, setting forth such illegality, error, or lack of uniformity.
  2. Any assessor or board of county commissioners, being of the opinion that the actual value of the property and plant of any public utility as determined by the administrator is illegal, erroneous, or not uniform with the actual value of like property similarly situated, as determined by the administrator, or that the amount of valuation of any public utility has not been correctly apportioned among the counties entitled thereto may, no later than July 15, file a petition or complaint with the administrator setting forth such illegality, error, lack of uniformity, or incorrect apportionment.
  3. Upon the filing of any petition or complaint provided for in this section, the administrator shall cause notice of such filing to be given to the assessor and the board of county commissioners of any county directly affected and to any public utility directly affected, as may appear from such petition or complaint. Such notice shall be mailed at least five days prior to the meeting with the administrator at which such petition or complaint will be heard.
  4. The administrator shall, on the first working day after notices of valuation are mailed and on succeeding days if necessary, hear all such petitions and complaints. In case there are several petitions or complaints filed involving like questions, the same may be consolidated for the purpose of hearing and determination. The administrator shall hear all evidence presented and listen to arguments touching upon the matters concerning which the petition or complaint was filed. He shall have power to subpoena and compel the attendance of witnesses and to require the production of any books or records deemed necessary to arrive at a proper determination of the matter. Upon good cause, any hearing may be adjourned from time to time, but in no event beyond July 27. Hearings conducted under this section shall be informal, and a verbatim record need not be made, as required under section 24-4-105 (13), C.R.S.
  5. The administrator shall render his decision upon any petition or complaint, in writing, no later than August 1 and shall transmit a copy thereof to all parties affected.
  6. If the administrator grants the petition, in whole or in part, the administrator shall make the appropriate corrections or changes in the valuation of such public utility, or in the apportionment thereof, and shall certify the same to the assessor of the county affected thereby. Such decision shall control all proceedings thereafter, the same as though originally certified by the administrator.
  7. If the administrator denies the petition, in whole or in part, all costs and expenses incurred in conducting the hearing shall be chargeable to the petitioner and shall be enforceable and collectible as in the case of other claims and demands.
  8. Further proceedings brought by a party adversely affected by the administrator's decision shall be before the board of assessment appeals under the provisions of section 39-2-125 or before the Denver district court for a trial de novo with no presumption in favor of any pending valuation, and no judicial review shall be available to any party under the provisions of section 39-4-109 until the board or the district court has rendered its decision.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 692, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-8. L. 70: p. 384, § 21. L. 89: (1), (2), (4), and (5) amended, p. 1465, § 31, effective June 7. L. 93: (1), (2), (4), and (5) amended, p. 1688, § 4, effective June 6. L. 96: (2), (6), and (8) amended, p. 720, § 4, effective May 22. L. 2000: (8) amended, p. 1739, § 3, effective June 1.

ANNOTATION

This section provides no basis for the contention that the abatement and refund scheme is inapplicable to state-assessed public utility property or that the protest and adjustment scheme is the exclusive method for adjusting property tax disputes involving such property. Huerfano County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 976 P.2d 893 (Colo. App. 1999).

The protest and adjustment procedure under this section is a separate and independent procedural system from the abatement and refund procedure and is governed by a different statute. Huerfano County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 976 P.2d 893 (Colo. App. 1999).

Applied in People v. Nichols, 34 Colo. App. 276, 527 P.2d 941 (1974).

39-4-109. Judicial review.

  1. Any petitioner or any other public utility, assessor, or board of county commissioners adversely affected or the administrator may appeal any decision of the board of assessment appeals or the district court denying a petition in whole or in part to the court of appeals. No new or additional evidence may be introduced in the court of appeals unless such other public utility, assessor, or board of county commissioners adversely affected has had no opportunity to present such evidence at the hearing before the board of assessment appeals or at the trial in the district court; otherwise, the cause shall be heard on the record of the board of assessment appeals or the district court, which shall be certified by it to the court in which the appeal was taken. Whenever any new or additional evidence is introduced, the court, in its discretion, may remand the case to the board of assessment appeals or the district court for rehearing.
  2. An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals according to the Colorado appellate rules and the provisions of section 24-4-106 (11), C.R.S., after the decision of the board of assessment appeals or the district court is issued, but, if the appeal is taken by the public utility actually owning the property involved in the petition to the board of assessment appeals or the district court, such public utility shall pay the full amount of all taxes levied upon the valuation for assessment of its property and plant to the treasurer of the county in which the same is located prior to taking its appeal.
  3. If, upon appeal to the court of appeals, the petitioner is sustained, in whole or in part, then, upon presentation to the treasurer to whom the taxes were paid of a certified copy of the order modifying the valuation for assessment of its property and plant, the treasurer shall forthwith make the appropriate refund of taxes, together with refund interest at the same rate as delinquent interest as specified in section 39-10-104.5, and the petitioner shall also be entitled to a refund of costs incurred in the hearing before the board of assessment appeals or the trial in the district court and in the appeal to the court or such portion thereof as the court may decree; but, if judgment is for the board of assessment appeals, then the board of assessment appeals shall receive its costs from the appellant. Such refund interest shall only accrue from the date on which payment of taxes was received by the treasurer from the petitioner.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 694, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-4-9. L. 70: p. 385, § 22. L. 83: (1) and (2) amended, p. 2086, § 3, effective October 13. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1690, § 7, effective June 9. L. 92: (3) amended, p. 2224, § 6, effective April 9; (3) amended, p. 2185, § 66, effective June 2. L. 93: (3) amended, p. 305, § 5, effective April 7. L. 2000: Entire section amended, p. 1739, § 4, effective June 1.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2000 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 358, Session Laws of Colorado 2000.

39-4-110. Certification and assessment of pollution control property. (Repealed)

Source: L. 78: Entire section added, p. 468, § 2, effective July 1. L. 79: (3) added, p. 1456, § 4, effective June 22. L. 81: (3) R&RE, p. 1872, § 5, effective June 29. L. 88: Entire section repealed, p. 1275, § 14, effective May 29, 1988.

ARTICLE 4.1 VALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION PROPERTY

39-4.1-101 to 39-4.1-110. (Repealed)

Editor's note:

  1. This article was added in 1981. For amendments to this article prior to its repeal in 1987, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.
  2. Section 39-4.1-110 provided for the repeal of this article, effective January 1, 1987. (See L. 84, p. 990 .)

ARTICLE 5 VALUATION AND TAXATION

Section

PART 1 REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Editor's note: This part 1 was repealed and reenacted in 1964. For historical information concerning the repeal and reenactment, see the editor's note before the article 1 heading.

39-5-101. Duties of assessor.

The assessor shall list all taxable real and personal property located within his county on the assessment date, other than that comprising the property and plant of public utilities.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 694, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-5-1. L. 73: p. 237, § 19. L. 75: Entire section amended, p. 1467, § 12, effective July 18. L. 81: Entire section amended, p. 1855, § 6, effective January 1, 1982. L. 94: Entire section amended, p. 1646, § 80, effective July 1.

ANNOTATION

Annotator's note. The following annotations include cases decided under this section as it existed prior to its 1964 repeal and reenactment.

Office of county assessor created by constitution. The office of county assessor in each county was created by the constitution, but the duties thereof are prescribed by legislative acts. Bartlett & Co. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 152 Colo. 388 , 382 P.2d 193 (1963).

Legislative duties must comply with constitution. County assessors have specific duties to perform in conformity with legislative directions and, in performing such duties, they must comply with the general admonition of § 3 of art. X, Colo. Const., with the ultimate goal of securing just and equalized valuations. Bartlett & Co. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 152 Colo. 388 , 382 P.2d 193 (1963).

Applied in Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Colo. Bd. of Assmt. Appeals, 628 P.2d 156 (Colo. App. 1981).

39-5-102. When schedules required - nonresident owners listed.

  1. Ownership of real property shall be ascertained by the assessor from the records of the county clerk and recorder, and owners of real property shall not be required to file schedules listing the same; but any person having or claiming to have an undivided interest in any real property, or any inchoate, possessory, or equitable interest therein, or any other estate less than the fee, or any lien on any real property may file a schedule with the assessor, specifying such interest.
  2. When the ownership of any real or personal property cannot be ascertained by the assessor after due diligence, he may list such property under the legend "owner unknown".
  3. The assessor shall furnish annually by the first day of June to the executive director of the department of revenue a list of the names and addresses of all nonresidents of the state as shown by the assessor's records as of the previous assessment date to have owned real or personal property within the county.

Source: L. 64: R&RE, p. 695, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 137-5-2. L. 69: p. 1132, § 1.

39-5-103. Property described.

In listing tracts or parcels of real property, the assessor shall identify the same by section, or part of a section, township, and range, and, if such part of a section is not a legal subdivision, then by some other descrip