Article 1. Attorney General.

§ 114-1. Creation of Department of Justice under supervision of Attorney General.

There is hereby created a Department of Justice which shall be under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General, as authorized by Article III, Sec. 7, of the Constitution of North Carolina.

History. 1939, c. 315, s. 1; 1973, c. 702, s. 1.

Cross References.

As to Human Trafficking Commission, see G.S. 114-70 .

Authorize Engagement with Third-Party Toxicology Laboratories to Guide Resources

Session Laws 2019-225, s. 9, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, local health departments as defined in G.S. 130A-2(5), and local law enforcement agencies are authorized to engage third-party toxicology laboratories, capable of providing clinical intelligence and data related to prescription and illicit drug usage trends and developments, for the purpose of providing data to guide the delivery of drug treatment and law enforcement resources.”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(a), provides: “The North Carolina State Crime Laboratory and the State DNA Database and Databank are hereby transferred from the State Bureau of Investigation and shall be relocated elsewhere within the Department of Justice, as determined by the Attorney General.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(b), provides: “No later than July 1, 2014, the Department of Justice shall begin budgeting the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory in a fund code that is separate from the remainder of the Department of Justice.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5 is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(a), provides: “The Division of Criminal Information of the Department of Justice is hereby transferred to the Department of Public Safety. This transfer shall have all of the elements of a Type I transfer, as described in G.S. 143A-6 .”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(b), provides: “The remainder of the State Bureau of Investigation is hereby transferred to the Department of Public Safety as a new section within the Law Enforcement Division. This transfer shall have all of the elements of a Type II transfer, as described in G.S. 143A-6 , except as provided in G.S. 143B-927 , as enacted by subsection (ttt) of this section.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: ‘This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Legal Periodicals.

For comment, see 17 N.C.L. Rev. 375 (1939).

For article, “The Common Law Powers of the Attorney General of North Carolina,” see 9 N.C. Cent. L.J. 1 (1977).

For comment, “A Defense of the Defense: An Analysis of the North Carolina Attorney General’s Legal Ability to Refuse to Defend State Laws,” see 96 N.C.L. Rev. 1855 (2018).

For article, “State Attorney’s General as Agents of Police Reform,” see 69 Duke L.J. 999 (2020).

For article, “A Typology of Justice Department Lawyers’ Roles and Responsibilities,” see 98 N. C.L. Rev. 1077 (2020).

CASE NOTES

Legislative Intent. —

The constitutional independence of the executive offices, and their differing functions and duties, create clear potential for conflict between their respective holders. In the event of such conflict, power in the Attorney General to resolve, without their consent, controversies involving agencies or departments under the supervision of the Governor could be abused by exercise in a manner effectively derogative of the Governor’s constitutional duties to exercise executive power and to supervise the official conduct of all executive officers. The General Assembly, in the enactment of G.S. 114-2(2) , did not intend to create such potential. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

§ 114-1.1. Common-law powers.

The General Assembly reaffirms that the Attorney General has had and continues to be vested with those powers of the Attorney General that existed at the common law, that are not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution or laws of North Carolina.

History. 1985, c. 479, s. 137.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Changes in the State’s Law Firm: The Powers, Duties and Operations of the Office of the Attorney General,” see 12 Campbell L. Rev. 343 (1990).

CASE NOTES

The duties of the Attorney General in this State as prescribed by statutory and common law include the duty to appear for and to defend the State or its agencies in all actions in which the State may be a party or interested. Martin v. Thornburg, 320 N.C. 533 , 359 S.E.2d 472, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2397 (1987).

The Attorney General’s common-law powers did not allow him as a party to challenge class action attorneys’ fees as “excessive.” Bailey v. North Carolina Dep't of Revenue, 353 N.C. 142 , 540 S.E.2d 313, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 896 (2000).

§ 114-2. Duties.

Pursuant to Section 7(2) of Article III of the North Carolina Constitution, it shall be the duty of the Attorney General:

  1. To defend all actions in the appellate division in which the State shall be interested, or a party, and to appear for the State in any other court or tribunal in any cause or matter, civil or criminal, in which the State may be a party or interested. The duty to represent the State in criminal appeals shall not be delegated to any district attorney’s office or any other entity.
  2. To represent all State departments, agencies, institutions, commissions, bureaus or other organized activities of the State which receive support in whole or in part from the State. Where the Attorney General represents a State department, agency, institution, commission, bureau, or other organized activity of the State which receives support in whole or in part from the State, the Attorney General shall act in conformance with Rule 1.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the North Carolina State Bar.
  3. Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 702, s. 2.
  4. To consult with and advise the prosecutors, when requested by them, in all matters pertaining to the duties of their office.
  5. To give, when required, his opinion upon all questions of law submitted to him by the General Assembly, or by either branch thereof, or by the Governor, Auditor, Treasurer, or any other State officer.
  6. To pay all moneys received for debts due or penalties to the State immediately after the receipt thereof into the treasury.
  7. To compare the warrants drawn on the State treasury with the laws under which they purport to be drawn.
  8. Subject to the provisions of G.S. 62-20 :
    1. To intervene, when he deems it to be advisable in the public interest, in proceedings before any courts, regulatory officers, agencies and bodies, both State and federal, in a representative capacity for and on behalf of the using and consuming public of this State. He shall also have the authority to institute and originate proceedings before such courts, officers, agencies or bodies and shall have authority to appear before agencies on behalf of the State and its agencies and citizens in all matters affecting the public interest.
    2. Upon the institution of any proceeding before any State agency by application, petition or other pleading, formal or informal, the outcome of which will affect a substantial number of residents of North Carolina, such agency or agencies shall furnish the Attorney General with copies of all such applications, petitions and pleadings so filed, and, when the Attorney General deems it advisable in the public interest to intervene in such proceedings, he is authorized to file responsive pleadings and to appear before such agency either in a representative capacity in behalf of the using and consuming public of this State or in behalf of the State or any of its agencies.
  9. To notify the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate whenever an action is filed in State or federal court that challenges the validity of a North Carolina statute or provision of the North Carolina Constitution under State or federal law.
  10. Pursuant to G.S. 120-32.6 , to represent upon request and otherwise abide by and defer to the final decision-making authority exercised by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, as agents of the State through the General Assembly, in defending any State or federal action challenging the validity or constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly or a provision of the North Carolina Constitution. If for any reason the Attorney General cannot perform the duty specified herein, the Attorney General may recuse personally from such defense but shall appoint another attorney employed by the Department of Justice to act at the direction of the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.

History. 1868-9, c. 270, s. 82; 1871-2, c. 112, s. 2; Code, s. 3363; 1893, c. 379; 1901, c. 744; Rev., s. 5380; C.S., s. 7694; 1931, c. 243, s. 5; 1933, c. 134, s. 8; 1941, c. 97; 1967, c. 691, s. 51; 1969, c. 535; 1973, c. 702, s. 2; 1977, c. 468, s. 17; 1979, c. 107, s. 9; 1983, c. 913, s. 15; 2014-100, s. 17.3A(b); 2017-57, s. 6.7(m); 2017-212, s. 5.2(a).

Cross References.

As to actions by the Attorney General, see G.S. 1-515 .

As to service standards and requirements, see G.S. 66-356 .

As to duty in prosecuting violations of laws governing monopolies and trusts, see G.S. 75-13 .

As to administrative remedies and cause of action for complaints regarding exercise of religious activity, see G.S. 115C-407.31 .

As to vacant positions, see G.S. 120-12.1 .

As to General Assembly’s authority to employ counsel in addition to or other than the Attorney General, see G.S. 120-32.6 .

Federal Grant Reporting.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 18.1, provides: “The Department of Correction [now Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety], the Department of Justice, the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety [now Department of Public Safety], the Judicial Department, and the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [now Division of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the Department of Public Safety] shall report by May 1 of each year to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Chairs of the House of Representatives and Senate Appropriations Committees, and the Chairs of the House of Representatives and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Justice and Public Safety on federal grant funds received or preapproved for receipt by those departments. The report shall include information on the amount of grant funds received or preapproved for receipt by each department, the use of the funds, the State match expended to receive the funds, and the period to be covered by each grant. If the department intends to continue the program beyond the end of the grant period, the department shall report on the proposed method for continuing the funding of the program at the end of the grant period. Each department shall also report on any information it may have indicating that the State will be requested to provide future funding for a program presently supported by a local grant.”

For similar prior provisions, see Session Laws 2003-284, s. 16.1, Session Laws 2005-276, s. 17.1, Session Laws 2007-323, s. 17.5, and Session Laws 2009-451, s. 19.2.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 16.2, provides: “The Department of Justice shall use funds available to purchase, or purchase licenses for, time management software to be used to ensure adequate record keeping and management of Department attorneys’ time. The software shall be of a quality and type generally used by attorneys in the private sector.”

Session Laws 2011-189, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2013-337, s. 5(a), provides: “(a) The Consumer Protection Division, Department of Justice, shall coordinate a Task Force on Fraud Against Older Adults. The Task Force shall include representatives from the Consumer Protection Division, Department of Justice; Division of Aging and Adult Services, Department of Health and Human Services; North Carolina Senior Consumer Fraud Task Force; North Carolina Association of County Directors of Social Services; the Banking Commission; the Senior Tar Heel Legislature; and other associations as approved by the Consumer Protection Division.

“(b) The Task Force shall include, but should not be limited to, examination of the following issues:

“(1) Identifying, clarifying, and strengthening laws to provide older adults a broader system of protection against abuse and fraud.

“(2) Establishing a statewide system to enable reporting on incidents of fraud and mistreatment of older adults.

“(3) Identifying opportunities for partnership among the Banking Commission, the financial management industry, and law enforcement agencies to prevent fraud against older adults.

“(4) Granting the Attorney General authority to initiate prosecutions for fraud against older adults.

“(c) The Task Force shall make a report to the North Carolina Study Commission on Aging on or before November 1, 2011, and a report including findings, recommendations, and draft legislation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services on or before February 1, 2013. The Task Force shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services prior to the 2014 Regular Session of the 2013 General Assembly on the efficacy of any of the Task Force’s recommendations that are adopted. The Task Force shall terminate on May 1, 2015, or upon the filing of its final report, whichever occurs first.”

Session Laws 2013-337, s. 5(b), provides: “The Consumer Protection Division, Department of Justice, shall add the following to its list of approved associations represented on the Task Force:

“(1) The North Carolina Credit Union League.

“(2) An association representing nondepository financial institutions.

“(3) The North Carolina Bar Association, whose participating representatives shall include attorneys involved in protecting the privacy and property interests of disabled and older adults.”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 15.3(a), provides: “The Department of Justice, Health Insurance Consumer Protection Unit, and any portion of the Managed Care Patient Assistance Program managed by the Department of Justice is transferred to the Department of Insurance. This transfer shall have all of the elements of a Type I transfer, as described in G.S. 143A-6 .”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2009-449, s. 1(a) and (b), provides: “(a) The Department of Justice and the Wildlife Resources Commission may develop jointly a plan for the construction and operation of a firing range on land owned by the Wildlife Resources Commission. The plan may identify a tract of land in the Green River game land approved by the Wildlife Resources Commission for this purpose. The plan may provide for a firing range that can accommodate the needs of the criminal justice officers attending the Western Justice Academy, federal, State, and local agencies, community college law enforcement training, and the law enforcement officers of the Wildlife Resources Commission, as well as provide a facility for hunter safety classes supervised and conducted by the Wildlife Resources Commission. The plan may further provide for a public firing and archery range, open and accessible for public use, to be operated by the Wildlife Resources Commission. The Wildlife Resources Commission, in consultation with the Department of Justice, may present the plan developed pursuant to this section to the Chairs of the Senate and House of Representatives Appropriations Committees on or before April 1, 2010.

“(b) The Department of Justice and the Wildlife Resources Commission may use receipts and other non-General Fund sources totaling up to the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) to provide additional funding for any project resulting from the plan authorized by this section, in addition to any funds that may be authorized or appropriated for the project by the General Assembly.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2011.’ ”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2012.’ ”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 27.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2012-2013 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2012-2013 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 27.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2017-212, s. 5.2(c), provides: “This section is effective July 1, 2017. It shall be the obligation of the Attorney General to work with each District Attorney to ensure that all criminal appeals delegated on or after July 1, 2017, to a District Attorney’s office shall be properly returned to the Attorney General’s office. Notwithstanding the previous two sentences, actions taken by the office of a District Attorney related to a criminal appeal delegated to that office on or after July 1, 2017, shall be deemed to have been taken with full legal authority to act on behalf of the State.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.3A(b), effective July 1, 2014, added the last sentence in subdivision (2).

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 6.7(m), “Pursuant to Section 7(2) of Article III of the North Carolina Constitution,” at the beginning of the introductory sentence and made a related change, and added subdivisions (9) and (10). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2017-212 s. 5.2(a), added the last sentence in subdivision (1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For article on antitrust and unfair trade practice law in North Carolina, comparing federal law, see 50 N.C.L. Rev. 199 (1972).

For article, “The Common Law Powers of the Attorney General of North Carolina,” see 9 N.C. Cent. L.J. 1 (1977).

For survey of 1984 administrative law, “A Declining Role for the Attorney General,” see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 1051 (1985).

For article, “Changes in the State’s Law Firm: The Powers, Duties and Operations of the Office of the Attorney General,” see 12 Campbell L. Rev. 343 (1990).

For comment, “The Advisory Opinion in North Carolina: 1947 to 1991,” see 70 N.C.L. Rev. 1853 (1992).

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality. —

The duty of the Attorney General to appear for the State in any court proceeding in which the State may be a party as provided in subdivision (1) of this section does not violate N.C. Const., Art. III, § 1. Martin v. Thornburg, 320 N.C. 533 , 359 S.E.2d 472, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2397 (1987).

Derivation. —

Pursuant to the authority under Article III, § 18 of the North Carolina Constitution, the General Assembly enacted this section, which prescribes the duties of the Attorney General. Sotelo v. Drew, 123 N.C. App. 464, 473 S.E.2d 379, 1996 N.C. App. LEXIS 700 (1996), aff'd, 345 N.C. 750 , 483 S.E.2d 439, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 182 (1997).

Statutory and Common-law Duties. —

The duties of the Attorney General in this State as prescribed by statutory and common law include the duty to appear for and to defend the State or its agencies in all actions in which the State may be a party or interested. Martin v. Thornburg, 320 N.C. 533 , 359 S.E.2d 472, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2397 (1987).

Legislative Intent. —

The constitutional independence of the executive offices, and their differing functions and duties, create clear potential for conflict between their respective holders. In the event of such conflict, power in the Attorney General to resolve, without their consent, controversies involving agencies or departments under the supervision of the Governor could be abused by exercise in a manner effectively derogative of the Governor’s constitutional duties to exercise executive power and to supervise the official conduct of all executive officers. The General Assembly, in the enactment of subdivision (2) of this section, did not intend to create such potential. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

Opinions Advisory Only. —

An opinion of the Attorney General, given in the performance of his statutory duty under subdivision (5) of this section, is advisory only. Lawrence v. Shaw, 210 N.C. 352 , 186 S.E. 504, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 102 (1936), rev'd, 300 U.S. 245, 57 S. Ct. 443, 81 L. Ed. 623, 1937 U.S. LEXIS 69 (1937).

Directives as to Legal Duties of Constitutional Officers. —

The Attorney General has no constitutional authority to issue a directive to any other constitutional officer concerning his legal duties. State v. Loesch, 237 N.C. 611 , 75 S.E.2d 654, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 695 (1953).

The responsibility for interpreting a tax statute is placed on the Commissioner of Revenue (now Secretary) by G.S. 105-264 , and the Attorney General’s opinion in regard thereto is advisory only. In re Virginia-Carolina Chem. Corp., 248 N.C. 531 , 103 S.E.2d 823, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 526 (1958).

Advisory Duty as to District Attorneys. —

The duty of the Attorney General as to the solicitors (now district attorneys) of the State is purely advisory. State v. Loesch, 237 N.C. 611 , 75 S.E.2d 654, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 695 (1953).

As to duties of Attorney General and district attorney in case on appeal, see State v. Hickman, 2 N.C. App. 627, 163 S.E.2d 632, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 985 (1968).

In passing G.S. 114-11.6 , the General Assembly made it clear that even upon a proper request and authorization by a district attorney, the Special Prosecution Division is to participate in criminal prosecutions only if the Attorney General, in his sole discretion as an independent constitutional officer, approves. Thus trial court exceeded its authority when it ordered that “the Attorney General’s Office shall immediately assume the prosecution of ” a capital case. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

Subdivision (1) of this section does not contemplate the Attorney General’s initiating an action under Article 2 of Chapter 128, where language therein has specifically set out who may file a petition for removal of a sheriff or police officer from office. State v. Felts, 79 N.C. App. 205, 339 S.E.2d 99, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987 (1986).

The Attorney General of North Carolina had standing to file a brief on behalf of appellant-mother, a New York resident, in a case involving the enforcement of orders rendered in an action to register a foreign child support order. New York v. Paugh, 135 N.C. App. 434, 521 S.E.2d 475, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 1154 (1999).

The duty to “consult with and advise the prosecutors, when requested by them, in all matters pertaining to the duties of their office” gives the Attorney General the authority to advise the prosecutors, not to completely replace them or act instead of them, unless there is an express statutory provision authorizing the Attorney General to initiate a particular action. State v. Felts, 79 N.C. App. 205, 339 S.E.2d 99, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987 (1986).

The Attorney General is bound by the traditional rule governing the attorney-client relationship when representing the departments, agencies, institutions, commissions, bureaus or other organized activities of the State. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

Attorney General cannot enter a consent judgment without the consent of a duly authorized department official. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

An agency or department of the State should have the right possessed by other litigants to determine whether its counsel, whether the Attorney General or otherwise, can enter a consent judgment on its behalf. Such a right is also consonant with fulfillment by the respective agencies and departments of the State of their statutorily assigned duties. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

There is nothing in the common-law powers of the Attorney General which grants him authority to enter consent judgments binding the agencies and departments of the State without their consent. North Carolina statutes do not expressly grant such power. The assignment of specific responsibilities and duties to the various agencies and departments would appear to indicate legislative intent to the contrary. Given the constitutional and statutory structure of State government, and the assignment of duties and responsibilities between and among its officers, agencies, and departments, considerations of sound public policy also suggest the contrary rule. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

State department’s authority is not plenary, nor is the Attorney General’s role as limited as that of an attorney for an ordinary litigant. Hendon v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 633 F. Supp. 454, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25908 (W.D.N.C. 1986).

Attorney General May Refuse to Confess Judgment as to Challenged Statute. —

The Attorney General, in representing a State agency, has the power to reject his client agency’s directive to enter into a judgment confessing that a certain act of the General Assembly is unconstitutional and continue the litigation. Hendon v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 633 F. Supp. 454, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25908 (W.D.N.C. 1986).

To permit State agencies to independently determine the constitutionality of acts to the exclusion of the Attorney General would effectively undermine the lawful authority of the Attorney General. Hendon v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 633 F. Supp. 454, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25908 (W.D.N.C. 1986).

Dual Role of Attorney General’s Office. —

Plaintiff offered no evidence to support the claim that the dual role served by the Attorney General’s Office both in representing defendant institution and being legal advisor to State Personnel Commission caused actual bias or unfair prejudice to plaintiff, nor that it created any delay in the disposition of her claims. Dorsey v. UNC-Wilmington, 122 N.C. App. 58, 468 S.E.2d 557, 1996 N.C. App. LEXIS 210 , cert. denied, 344 N.C. 629 , 477 S.E.2d 37, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 547 (1996).

§ 114-2.1. Consent judgments.

In litigation in which the State is interested or is a party, no consent judgment shall be entered into by the State unless and no consent judgment shall be binding on the State except to the extent that the State’s entire obligation for the current and for future fiscal years will be satisfied with funds that are available for that purpose for the current fiscal year, including funds that the Council of State agrees to allot from the Contingency and Emergency Fund, provided that for payments of tort claims and workers’ compensation claims it shall not be binding on the State except to the extent that the State’s entire obligation for the current and for future fiscal years can be satisfied with funds that are available for the current fiscal year, including funds that the Council of State agrees to allot from the Contingency and Emergency Fund. The Director of the Budget shall report to the appropriation committees of the General Assembly concerning all funds made available during the preceding fiscal year from the Contingency and Emergency Fund for the purpose of carrying out consent judgments.

History. 1981 (Reg. Sess., 1982), c. 1282, s. 51; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1034, s. 95; c. 1116, s. 85.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1984 administrative law, “A Declining Role for the Attorney General,” see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 1051 (1985).

CASE NOTES

The Attorney General is bound by the traditional rule governing the attorney-client relationship when representing the departments, agencies, institutions, commissions, bureaus or other organized activities of the State. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

Attorney General cannot enter a consent judgment without the consent of the entity represented. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

There is nothing in the common-law powers of the Attorney General which grants him authority to enter consent judgments binding the agencies and departments of the State without their consent. North Carolina statutes do not expressly grant such power. The assignment of specific responsibilities and duties to the various agencies and departments would appear to indicate legislative intent to the contrary. Given the constitutional and statutory structure of State government, and the assignment of duties and responsibilities between and among its officers, agencies, and departments, considerations of sound public policy also suggest the contrary rule. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

An agency or department of the State should have the right possessed by other litigants to determine whether its counsel, whether the Attorney General or otherwise, can enter a consent judgment on its behalf. Such a right is also consonant with fulfillment by the respective agencies and departments of the State of their statutorily assigned duties. Tice v. DOT, 67 N.C. App. 48, 312 S.E.2d 241, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 2989 (1984).

State department’s authority is not plenary, nor is the Attorney General’s role as limited as that of an attorney for an ordinary litigant. Hendon v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 633 F. Supp. 454, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25908 (W.D.N.C. 1986).

Attorney General May Refuse to Confess Judgment as to Challenged Statute. —

The Attorney General, representing a State agency, has the power to reject his client agency’s directive to enter into a judgment confessing that a certain act of the General Assembly is unconstitutional and continue the litigation. Hendon v. North Carolina State Bd. of Elections, 633 F. Supp. 454, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25908 (W.D.N.C. 1986).

§ 114-2.2. Consent judgments.

  1. To be effective against the State, a consent judgment entered into by the State, a State department, State agency, State institution, or a State officer who is a party in his official capacity must be signed personally by the Attorney General. This power of approval may not be delegated to a deputy or assistant Attorney General or to any other subordinate. This subsection shall not apply to consent judgments that name as a party a State department, agency, institution, or officer. (a1) Where a dispute, claim, or controversy names as a party a State department, agency, or institution, or officer, a consent judgment shall be approved by the head of the department, agency, or institution, or by the State officer, before the judgment may be entered.

    (a2) Where a dispute, claim, or controversy is challenging a North Carolina statute or provision of the North Carolina Constitution, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate (i) have jointly intervened on behalf of the General Assembly in accordance with G.S. 1-72.2 or (ii) are otherwise jointly named in their official capacities as parties to the dispute, claim, or controversy, a consent judgment shall be jointly approved by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, or by and through counsel of their choice, before the judgment may be entered.

  2. The provisions of this section are supplemental to G.S. 114-2.1 .
  3. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the Attorney General by rule may delegate to a deputy or assistant Attorney General or to another subordinate the power to sign consent judgments in condemnation or eminent domain actions brought under the provisions of Chapters 40A or 136 of the General Statutes and consent judgments under the provision of Article 31 of Chapter 143 (Tort Claims Act) and Chapter 97 (Workers’ Compensation Act) of the General Statutes.

History. 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1034, s. 95; c. 1116, s. 85; 2014-100, s. 17.3A(c); 2021-180, s. 18.7(a).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.7(d), made subsection (a2) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.7(a), effective November 18, 2021, and applicable to consent judgments, settlement agreements, or other agreements that would dispose of a dispute, claim, or controversy entered on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.3A(c), effective August 7, 2014, substituted “Consent judgments” for “Attorney General to approve consent judgments” in the section heading; added the last sentence in subsection (a); and added subsection (a1).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.7(a), effective November 18, 2021, added subsection (a2). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 114-2.3. Use of private counsel limited.

  1. Every agency, institution, department, bureau, board, or commission of the State, authorized by law to retain private counsel, shall obtain written permission from the Attorney General prior to employing private counsel. This section does not apply to counties, cities, towns, other municipal corporations or political subdivisions of the State, or any agencies of these municipal corporations or political subdivisions, or to county or city boards of education. This subsection does not apply to private counsel retained by the Judicial Department for the defense of an official or employee of the Department in any action arising from conduct undertaken in the course of the official’s or employee’s official duties and in which the Attorney General has declined to provide the litigation services.
  2. Article 2A of this Chapter applies to any contract to retain private counsel authorized by the Attorney General under this section.
  3. Except as provided in G.S. 147-17 , the Attorney General shall represent the State in any action requiring the State to be a party under G.S. 1-72.3 .
  4. No State funds shall be withdrawn from the State treasury to pay for litigation services provided by private counsel except as expressly authorized by an appropriation of the General Assembly. As used in this subsection, litigation services include legal work conducted in anticipation of, or in preparation for, any suit or action. As used in this section, private counsel includes any licensed attorney retained by, engaged by, or otherwise representing a department, officer, agency, institution, commission, bureau, or other organized activity of the State but does not include a licensed attorney who holds a permanent budgeted position in either the Department of Justice or the applicable department, officer, agency, institution, commission, bureau, or other organized activity of the State.

History. 1985, c. 479, s. 135; 2014-110, s. 1.2; 2016-109, s. 2(b); 2017-57, s. 6.7(b); 2021-180, s. 16.10(c).

Outside Legal Counsel/Department of Transportation.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 7.17(f), provides: “Expert Counsel Required. — Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department of Revenue shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to negotiate and review contracts associated with an additional public-private arrangement authorized under this section.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 34.27, as amended by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(a), provides: “The Department of Transportation may engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent expertise to provide legal services related to transportation projects undertaken by the Department. The Department shall supervise and manage the private counsel engaged under this section and shall not be required to obtain written permission or approval from the Attorney General under G.S. 114-2.3 .”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 29.8(a) effective July 1, 2015, repealed Session Laws 2013-360, s. 34.27, as amended by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(a).

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 10.41(c), provides: “(c) Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to review requests for proposals and to negotiate and review contracts associated with MMIS. The counsel engaged by the Department shall review the MMIS contract between the Department and the vendor to ensure that the requirements of subsection (a) of this section are met in their entirety.”

For similar prior provisions, see Session Laws 2007-323, s. 10.40D(a) and (b), as amended by Session Laws 2008-107, 10.9(a).

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 10.29(f), provides: “Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department shall engage the services of private counsel with pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to review requests for proposals and to negotiate and review contracts associated with the replacement MMIS [Medicaid Management Information System]. This shall include amendments exceeding ten million dollars ($10,000,000). The counsel engaged by the Department shall review the replacement MMIS [Medicaid Management Information System] contracts and amendments between the Department and the vendor to ensure that the requirements of subsection (d) of this section are met in their entirety and that the terms of the contract are in the State’s best interest.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12A.4(e), provides: “Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department shall consult with the Office of the SCIO concerning the retention of private counsel for the replacement MMIS, and as directed by the Office of the SCIO, retain private counsel with expertise in pertinent information technology and computer law to negotiate and review contract amendments associated with the replacement MMIS. The private counsel engaged by the Department shall review the replacement MMIS contract amendments between the Department and the vendors to ensure that the requirements of subsection (c) of this section are met in their entirety and that the terms of the contract amendments are in the State’s best interest.”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 6.9(b), as amended by Session Laws 2008-107, s. 23.1, provides: “(b) The General Assembly finds that a computer system that records tax payments and determines when the payments are overdue directly and primarily relates to the collection of overdue tax debts and that the proceeds of the collection assistance fee imposed by G.S. 105-243.1 may be applied to the cost of the computer system. The Department of Revenue is authorized to use funds in the 20% Collection Assistance Fee Account, Budget Code 24704-2474, during the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 fiscal years to replace the Department’s current computer system, and these funds are appropriated to the Department for that purpose. For fiscal year 2007-2008, the Department shall not use more than fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) from the Account to replace the Department’s current computer system. For fiscal year 2008-2009, the Department shall not use more than twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) from the Account to replace the Department’s current computer system.

“Funds appropriated under this subsection may be transferred to Budget Code 24708-2478 to be applied to expenditures for a replacement computer system. Funds appropriated under this subsection that are not transferred to Budget Code 24708-2478 remain in the Account until they are transferred to that Budget Code or withdrawn for expenditures for a replacement computer system. Funds appropriated under this subsection that are not expended at the end of the 2007-2009 biennium remain available for expenditure for the purpose designated in this subsection.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 6.9 (c), provides: “(c) The Department of Revenue shall contract with private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to review requests for proposals and to negotiate and review contracts associated with the Integrated Tax Administration System. G.S. 114-2.3 does not apply to this subsection.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2007.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 6.20(b), provides: “Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department of Revenue shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to review requests for proposals, and to negotiate and review contracts associated with TIMS and the additional components of the Planning and Design Project (PDP)(Enterprise Data Warehouse, Management Reporting and Decision Analytics, Customer Relationship Management, Enterprise Case Management, and E-Services).”

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2009.”

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 6A.5(b), provides: “Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department of Revenue shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to review requests for proposals, and to negotiate and review contracts associated with TIMS and the additional components of the Planning and Design Project (PDP)(Enterprise Data Warehouse, Management Reporting and Decision Analytics, Customer Relationship Management, Enterprise Case Management, and E-Services).”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2011.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 6A.3(f), provides: “Expert Counsel Required. — Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Department of Revenue shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to negotiate and review contracts associated with an additional public-private arrangement authorized under this section.”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 6A.12(i), provides: “Notwithstanding G.S. 114-2.3 , the Office of the State CIO shall engage the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to negotiate and review contracts associated with the State portal.” Session Laws 2012-142, s. 6A.12(a)-(h), pertaining to the implementation and operation of a statewide electronic portal, and the associated reporting requirements for the State Chief Information Officer, has been codified at G.S. 147-33.87A.

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 6A.12(j), repealed Session Laws 2011-145, s. 6A.10, as amended by Session Laws 2011-391, s. 12(b), which contained similar provisions regarding engaging the services of private counsel with the pertinent information technology and computer law expertise to negotiate and review contracts associated with the implementation of a state electronic portal.

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2012.”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 27.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2012-2013 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2012-2013 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 27.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(b), provides: “It is the intent of the General Assembly that the Department of Transportation exercise the authority granted by subsection (a) of this section to maximize operational and project delivery benefits attributed to the avoidance or successful defense of litigation. To accomplish this intent, the Department is directed to increase its utilization of external counsel to no less than ten percent (10%) of new cases arising during the 2014-2015 fiscal year, increasing to no less than twenty percent (20%) of new cases arising during the 2015-2016 fiscal year.” Session Laws 2015-241, s. 29.8(b) effective July 1, 2015, repealed Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(b).

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(c), provides: “The Department shall develop performance metrics to evaluate its utilization of in-house and outside counsel, to include the following:

“(1) A summary of new matters opened by legal area.

“(2) Case cycle times.

“(3) Resolution of cases.

“(4) A comparison of in-house costs to billable rates for external counsel.

“(5) The process for procurement for legal services.

“The Department shall report no later than January 1, 2015, and quarterly thereafter, to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee and the Joint Legislative Justice and Public Safety Oversight Committee regarding the performance metrics set forth in this subsection.” Session Laws 2015-241, s. 29.8(b) effective July 1, 2015, repealed Session Laws 2014-100, s. 34.24(c).

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 27.9, provides: “Of the amount appropriated for the 2015-2016 fiscal year to the Department of Administration, the Department shall allocate the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) in nonrecurring funds for hiring private counsel for pending litigation to confirm the State’s title to certain lands brought pursuant to the Department’s authority under G.S. 146-2 . In the discretion of the Department, G.S. 114-2.3 and G.S. 147-17(a) through (c) shall not apply to the Department if the Department is engaged in litigation for which funding is provided in this section. The Secretary may retain private counsel to represent the Department to be paid with State funds appropriated in this section. If private counsel is to be so retained to represent the Department, the Secretary shall designate lead counsel who shall possess final decision-making authority with respect to the representation, counsel, or service for the Department. Other counsel for the Department shall, consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct, cooperate with such designated lead counsel.”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2016-109, s. 2(c), made subsection (c) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2016-109, s. 2(b), applicable to actions filed on or after August 1, 2016.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 15.18(b), (c), provides: “(b) Notwithstanding G.S. 147-17 and G.S. 114-2.3 , the North Carolina Industrial Commission is authorized to use the funds carried forward under subsection (a) of this section to employ and supervise private counsel.

“(c) Notwithstanding G.S. 1-521 , 147-17, and 114-2.3, of the funds appropriated to the North Carolina Industrial Commission in this act, the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) for the 2017-2018 fiscal year may be used for private legal services, litigation-related expenses, and the defense of any member in his or her official capacity arising from S.L. 2016-125. The funds allocated in this section shall not revert.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-110, s. 1.2, added subsection (b). See Editor’s note for effective date and applicability.

Session Laws 2016-109, s. 2(b), effective August 1, 2016, added subsection (c). See editor’s note for applicability.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 6.7(b), effective July 1, 2017, added subsection (d).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 16.10(c), effective November 18, 2021, added the last sentence in subsection (a).

§ 114-2.4. Settlement agreements.

  1. The Attorney General shall review the terms of all proposed agreements entered into by the State or a State department, agency, institution, or officer to settle or resolve litigation or potential litigation, that involves the payment of public monies in the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or more. In order for such an agreement or contract to be effective against the State, the Attorney General shall submit to the State or the State department, agency, institution, or officer a written opinion regarding the terms of the proposed agreement and the advisability of entering into the agreement, prior to entering into the agreement. The written opinion required by this section shall be maintained in the official file of the final settlement agreement. The Attorney General by rule may delegate to a deputy or assistant Attorney General or to another subordinate the authority to review settlement agreements. (a1) Where a dispute, claim, or controversy names as a party a State department, agency, or institution, or officer, a proposed settlement agreement or other agreement that would dispose of the dispute, claim, or controversy shall be approved by the head of the department, agency, or institution, or by the State officer, before the agreement may be entered.

    (a2) Where a dispute, claim, or controversy is challenging a North Carolina statute or provision of the North Carolina Constitution, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate (i) have intervened on behalf of the General Assembly in accordance with G.S. 1-72.2 or (ii) are otherwise jointly named in their official capacities as parties to the dispute, claim, or controversy, a proposed settlement agreement or other agreement that would dispose of the dispute, claim, or controversy shall be jointly approved by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, or by and through counsel of their choice, before the agreement may be entered.

  2. The Attorney General shall report to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations on all agreements entered into by the State or a State department, agency, institution, or officer to settle or resolve litigation or potential litigation, that involves the payment of public monies in the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or more.

History. 1997-443, s. 20.14(a); 2014-100, s. 17.3A(d); 2021-180, s. 18.7(b).

Editor’s Note.

At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, subsection (b), as added by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.3A(d), has been redesignated as subsection (a1), and existing subsection (b), which was redesignated as subsection (c) by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.3A(d), remains subsection (b).

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.7(d), made subsection (a2) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-180. s. 18.7(b), effective November 18, 2021, and applicable to consent judgments, settlement agreements, or other agreements that would dispose of a dispute, claim, or controversy entered on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.3A(d), effective August 7, 2014, substituted “Settlement agreements” for “Attorney General to render opinion on settlement” in the section heading; substituted “review settlement agreements” for “approve settlement agreements”; added present subsection (b); and redesignated former subsection (b) as present subsection (c). See Editor’s note for redesignation of subsections by the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.7(b), effective November 18, 2021, added subsection (a2). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

The enactment of this section does not provide a basis for refusing a consent decree in federal court. United States v. North Carolina, 180 F.3d 574, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 12014 (4th Cir. 1999).

§ 114-2.4A. Disposition of funds received by the State or a State agency from a settlement or other final order or judgment of the court.

  1. Definition. —  For purposes of this section, the term “settlement” means an agreement entered into by the State or a State agency, with or without a court’s participation, that ends (i) a dispute, lawsuit, or part of the dispute or lawsuit or (ii) the involvement of the State or State agency in the dispute, lawsuit, or part of the dispute or lawsuit. This term includes settlement agreements, stipulation agreements, consent judgments, and consent decrees.
  2. Prohibition. —  The following restrictions shall apply:
    1. Funds received by the State or a State agency from a settlement or other final order or judgment of the court shall not be transferred or expended pursuant to G.S. 143C-6-4 and shall remain unexpended until the funds are appropriated by the General Assembly. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prohibit the expenditure of funds to any of the following:
      1. A party, other than the State or a State agency, to the dispute or lawsuit.
      2. A consumer entitled to a refund or the recovery of damages.
      3. An attorney awarded attorneys’ fees for representing (i) a party under sub-subdivision a. of this subdivision or (ii) a consumer under sub-subdivision b. of this subdivision.
    2. The Attorney General, any subordinate who has been delegated the authority to negotiate or approve a settlement, and any private counsel retained to represent a State agency shall have no authority to include or agree to terms or conditions in any settlement that authorizes the expenditure, transfer, or award of funds to any person or entity other than any of the following:
      1. A party, other than the State or a State agency, to the dispute or lawsuit.
      2. A consumer entitled to a refund or the recovery of damages.
      3. An attorney awarded attorneys’ fees for representing (i) a party under sub-subdivision a. of this subdivision or (ii) a consumer under sub-subdivision b. of this subdivision.
  3. Exception. —  Subsections (b) and (e) of this section shall not apply to:
    1. Funds received by the Department of Health and Human Services to the extent those funds represent the recovery of previously expended Medicaid funds.
    2. Funds received by the Escheat Fund and benefit plans administered by the Department of State Treasurer.
    3. Funds received by the Department of Transportation to the extent those funds represent the recovery of funds previously expended by the Department of Transportation.
  4. Recommendation. —  The Attorney General may provide a nonbinding written recommendation to the chairs of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees for their consideration as to what purpose the funds subject to the prohibition in subsection (b) of this section should be appropriated for.
  5. Overrealized Receipts. —  Any provision of law authorizing the expenditure of overrealized receipts shall not apply to the funds referred to in subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of this section unless the language of the law specifically references this section or specifically references funds received by the State or a State agency from a settlement or other final order or judgment of the court.
  6. Required Disposition. —  If the terms of a federal grant, another provision of State or federal law, or the State Constitution require a specific disposition of funds received from a settlement or other final order or judgment of the court, nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede, or authorize a deviation from, that specific disposition. Furthermore, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to abrogate the requirement that funds drawn from the State treasury be in consequence of appropriations made by law.
  7. Required Submission. —  In addition to any other report or filing that may be required by law, and unless the settlement is sealed pursuant to a written order of the court in accordance with G.S. 132-1.3 or federal law, the Attorney General’s Office shall submit a copy to the Legislative Library of any settlement or other final order or judgment of the court in which the State or a State agency receives funds in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). The submission required by this subsection shall be made within 60 days of the date (i) the settlement is entered into or (ii) the final order or judgment of the court is entered. Any information deemed confidential by State or federal law shall be redacted from the copy of the settlement or other final order or judgment of the court prior to submitting it to the Legislative Library.

History. 2014-100, s. 6.6(a); 2015-67, s. 5; 2017-57, s. 34.7A.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 13.2(a), (b), as amended by Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.11(a), provides: “(a) In developing the “Beneficiary Mitigation Plan” (Plan) as mandated in the procedures for distribution of the State’s share of the environmental mitigation trust established in the consent decree resolving the case In Re: Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, Civil Case No. 3:15-md-02672 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Trust), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) or any other agency, department, office, or division designated by the Governor as the lead agency under the procedures set forth in the trust agreement shall consult with the Department of Transportation, the Department of Commerce, and other interested State agencies in the formulation of the Plan.

“(b) No funds may be expended under the Plan until DEQ, or any other agency, department, office, or division designated by the Governor as the lead agency, has submitted the Plan to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the chairs of the House Appropriations Committee, the chairs of the Senate Appropriations/Base Budget Committee, and the Fiscal Research Division and the General Assembly has appropriated the funds. DEQ, or any other agency, department, office, or division designated by the Governor as the lead agency, is prohibited from directing payments of funds from the Trust to any third party unless the funds received from the Trust are deposited in the State Treasury and appropriated by an act of the General Assembly. Upon receipt of funds from the Trust in accordance with the Plan and funding requests submitted to the Trustee by DEQ, and the appropriation of the funds by an act of the General Assembly granting the Department legal authority to direct payment of funds, the Department may direct those funds in the manner approved by the Trustee consistent with the appropriation, the Plan, and the funding request.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 13.11(b), (c), provides: “(b) The Volkswagen Litigation Environmental Mitigation Fund is established as a special fund in the State Treasury. The purpose of the Volkswagen Litigation Environmental Mitigation Fund is to receive funds received by the State as a beneficiary of the environmental mitigation trust fund established in the consent decree resolving the case In Re: Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation , Civil Case No. 3:15-md-02672 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Trust).

“(c) The State Controller shall reserve to the Volkswagen Litigation Environmental Mitigation Fund funds received from the Trust. Funds reserved in the Volkswagen Litigation Environmental Mitigation Fund do not constitute an ‘appropriation made by law,’ as that phrase is used in Section 7(1) of Article V of the North Carolina Constitution.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2015-67, s. 5, effective July 1, 2015, in subsection (c), inserted the subdivision (c)(1) designation and added subdivision (c)(2).

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 34.7A., effective July 1, 2017, added subdivision (c)(3).

CASE NOTES

Disclosure of Settlement Documents. —

Settlement documents in an action brought by a state agency were not exempt from disclosure under G.S. 132-1.3 because subsequently enacted G.S. 114-2.4 A showed the legislature intended to make such documents public records. Jackson v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., 238 N.C. App. 351, 768 S.E.2d 23, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 1335 (2014).

§ 114-2.5. Attorney General to report payment of public monies pursuant to settlement agreements and final court orders.

  1. Not less than 30 days prior to the disbursement of funds received by the State or a State agency pursuant to a settlement agreement or final order or judgment of the court where the amount of funds received exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000), the Attorney General shall file a written report with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations and the Chairs of the Appropriations Subcommittees on Justice and Public Safety of the Senate and House of Representatives on the payments received by the State or a State agency. The Attorney General shall also report on the terms or conditions of payment and of any disbursements set forth in the agreement or order. The Attorney General shall submit a written report to the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly.
  2. This section only applies to executed settlement agreements and final orders or judgments of the court and shall in no way affect the authority of the Attorney General to negotiate the settlement of cases in which the State or a State department, agency, institution, or officer is a party.

History. 1998-212, s. 18.7(b); 1999-237, s. 19(b).

§ 114-2.5A. Report by the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit required annually.

By September 1 of each year, the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Department of Justice shall file a written report about its activities with the Chairs of the Appropriations Subcommittees on Justice and Public Safety and Health and Human Services of the Senate and House of Representatives and with the Fiscal Research Division of the Legislative Services Office. This report may be combined with the report required by G.S. 1-617 and shall include the following information about the Unit’s activities during the previous fiscal year:

  1. The number of matters reported to the Unit.
  2. The number of cases investigated.
  3. The number of criminal convictions and civil settlements.
  4. The total amount of funds recovered in each case.
  5. The allocation of recovered funds in each case to (i) the federal government; (ii) the State Medical Assistance Program; (iii) the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund; (iv) the Department of Justice; and (v) other victims.

History. 2010-31, s. 16.1.

§ 114-2.5B. Annual report on grant funds received or preapproved for receipt.

The Department of Justice shall report by May 1 of each year to the chairs of the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee on Justice and Public Safety and the Senate Appropriations Committee on Justice and Public Safety on grant funds received or preapproved for receipt by the Department. The report shall include information on the amount of grant funds received or preapproved for receipt by the Department, the use of the funds, the State match expended to receive the funds, and the period to be covered by each grant. If the Department intends to continue the program beyond the end of the grant period, the Department shall report on the proposed method for continuing the funding of the program at the end of the grant period. The Department shall also report on any information it may have indicating that the State will be requested to provide future funding for a program presently supported by a local grant.

History. 2021-180, s. 19A.1(b).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.8, made this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19A.1(b), effective July 1, 2021.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-2.6. Attorney General to report on pending lawsuits in which State is a party.

By April 1 and October 1 of each year, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the Chairs of the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Chairs of the Appropriations Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, the Chairs of the Finance Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, and the Fiscal Research Division of the Legislative Services Office on any lawsuit in which the constitutionality of a North Carolina law has been challenged and on any case in which plaintiffs seek in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in damages. In addition, the Attorney General shall submit a written report to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Chairs of the Appropriations Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, the Chairs of the Finance Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, and the Fiscal Research Division of the Legislative Services Office within 30 days of a final judgment that orders the State to pay the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more.

History. 2001-424, s. 23.11(a).

§ 114-2.7.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-901 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(g), effective July 1, 2014.

§ 114-3. To devote whole time to duties.

The Attorney General shall devote his whole time to the duties of the office and shall not engage in the private practice of law.

History. 1929, c. 1, s. 1.

§ 114-4. Assistants; compensation; assignments.

The Attorney General shall be allowed to appoint from among his staff such number of assistant attorneys general as he shall deem advisable, and each of such assistant attorneys general shall be subject to all of the provisions of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes relating to the State Human Resources system. Two assistant attorneys general shall be assigned to the State Department of Revenue. The other assistant attorneys general shall perform such duties as may be assigned by the Attorney General: Provided, however, the provisions of this section shall not be construed as preventing the Attorney General from assigning additional duties to the assistant attorneys general assigned to the State Department of Revenue.

History. 1925, c. 207, s. 1; 1937, c. 357; 1945, c. 786; 1947, c. 182; 1967, c. 260, s. 1; 1973, c. 702, s. 3; 2014-115, s. 55.4(c).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-115, s. 55.4(c), effective August 11, 2014, substituted “State Human Resources system” for “State Personnel System” at the end of the first sentence.

§ 114-4.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 702, s. 4.

§ 114-4.2. Assistant attorneys general and other attorneys to assist Department of Transportation.

The Attorney General is authorized to appoint from among his staff such assistant attorneys general and such other staff attorneys as he shall deem advisable to provide all legal assistance for the State highway functions of the Department of Transportation, and such assistant attorneys general and other attorneys shall also perform such additional duties as may be assigned to them by the Attorney General, and shall otherwise be subject to all provisions of the statutes relating to assistant attorneys general and other staff attorneys. There shall be appropriated from the State Highway Fund such sum as may be necessary to pay the salaries of said assistant attorneys general and other attorneys and necessary secretaries. The Department of Transportation shall provide adequate office space, equipment and supplies.

History. 1957, c. 65, s. 9; 1965, c. 55, s. 16; c. 408, s. 1; 1973, c. 702, s. 5; 1975, c. 716, s. 7; 1977, c. 464, s. 36.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1984 administrative law, “A Declining Role for the Attorney General,” see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 1051 (1985).

§ 114-4.2A. Assistant attorney general assigned to State Insurance Department.

Such assistant attorneys general as are assigned to the Commissioner of Insurance and the State Insurance Department by the Attorney General shall perform such additional duties as may be assigned to them by the Attorney General, and shall otherwise be subject to all provisions of the statutes relating to assistant attorneys general.

History. 1967, c. 1115, s. 1; 1973, c. 702, s. 6.

§ 114-4.2B. Employment of attorney for University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.

The Attorney General is hereby authorized to employ an attorney to be assigned by him full time to the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill. Such attorney shall be subject to all the provisions of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes, relating to the State Human Resources system. Such attorney shall also perform additional duties as may be assigned to him by the Attorney General.

The attorney employed by the Attorney General under provisions of this section shall be paid from the funds of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.

History. 1975, c. 526, s. 1; 1989, c. 141, s. 3; 2014-115, s. 55.4(c).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-115, s. 55.4(c), effective August 11, 2014, substituted “State Human Resources system” for “State Personnel System” near the end of the second sentence.

§ 114-4.2C. Employment of attorney for the Real Estate Commission.

The Attorney General is hereby authorized to employ an attorney and assign him full time to the North Carolina Real Estate Commission. Such attorney shall be subject to all the provisions of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes relating to the State Human Resources system. Such attorney shall also perform such additional duties as may be assigned to him by the Attorney General.

The North Carolina Real Estate Commission shall fully reimburse the North Carolina Department of Justice for the compensation of such attorney employed under the provisions of this section.

History. 1975, c. 835, ss. 1, 2; 1983, c. 81, s. 1; 2014-115, s. 55.4(c).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-115, s. 55.4(c), effective August 11, 2014, substituted “State Human Resources system” for “State Personnel System” near the end of the second sentence.

§ 114-4.2D. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2014-4, s. 29(a), effective June 4, 2014.

History. 1979, c. 942; 1989, c. 751, s. 7(11); 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 959, s. 29; 2000-140, s. 76(e); 2010-142, s. 7; 2013-365, s. 8(l); repealed by 2014-4, s. 29(a), effective June 4, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 114-4.2 D pertained to employment of an attorney for the Energy Policy Council of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Energy Efficiency Program of the Department of Commerce.

§ 114-4.2E. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1981, c. 859, s. 13.10.

§ 114-4.2F. Designation of attorney specializing in the law of the handicapped.

The Attorney General is authorized to designate from his staff an attorney to specialize in the law of the handicapped. The attorney so designated shall act as advisor to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, the Division of Services for the Deaf and the Hard of Hearing, the North Carolina School for the Deaf and the Governor Morehead School.

History. 1983, c. 850, s. 1; 1989, c. 533, s. 7.

§ 114-4.2G. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2002-168, s. 6, effective October 1, 2002.

Cross References.

As to retention of private counsel by the North Carolina Board of Landscape Architects, see G.S. 89A-3.1(14) .

§ 114-4.3. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 702, s. 7.

§ 114-4.4. Deputy attorneys general.

The Attorney General is hereby authorized to designate from among his staff such deputy attorneys general as he shall deem advisable to perform such duties and undertake such responsibilities as he may direct.

History. 1963, c. 355; 1973, c. 702, s. 8.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Those members of the Council of State who have statutory authority to delegate duties may, in conformity with such statutes, attend and vote at meetings of Boards of which they are ex officio members through delegates or designated subordinates. The remaining members of the Council of State may make similar delegations or designations where, in the member’s judgment, other duties necessitate his absence and the statute creating his ex officio membership does not express or clearly imply an intent of the General Assembly that the powers of such membership be exercised personally. See opinion of Attorney General to the honorable James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance, 55 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 116 (1986).

§ 114-5. Additional clerical help.

The Attorney General shall be allowed such additional clerical help as shall be necessary; the amount of such help and the salary therefor shall be fixed by the Department of Administration and the Attorney General.

History. 1925, c. 207, s. 2; 1957, c. 269, s. 1.

§ 114-6. Duties of Attorney General as to civil litigation.

The Attorney General shall continue to perform all duties now required of his office by law and to exercise the duties now prescribed by law as to civil litigation affecting the State, or any agency or department thereof, and shall assign to the members of the staff all duties to be performed in connection with criminal prosecutions and civil litigation authorized by this Article or by existing laws.

History. 1939, c. 315, ss. 7, 8.

§ 114-6.1. Biannual reporting on attorney activity.

Beginning on February 1, 2013, and every six months thereafter, the Attorney General shall report on the work of Department of Justice attorneys during the previous two quarters. The reports required by this section shall be filed with the Chairs of the House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Justice and Public Safety and with the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly as follows:

  1. Agency-specific work.—  A report on the work of Department of Justice attorneys for State agencies. This report shall include at least all of the following information:
    1. The amount of time spent working for each State department and agency.
    2. The amount of time spent on each case for each State department and agency.
    3. The amount billed to each State agency for the legal services provided.
  2. Other work.—  A report on the work of Department of Justice attorneys that is not on behalf of a particular State agency. The report required by this subdivision shall include all of the information required by subdivision (1) of this section. The report shall include at least all of the following information:
    1. The amount of time spent by each unit of the Department of Justice.
    2. The amount of time spent on each particular matter for each unit of the Department of Justice.

History. 2012-142, s. 15.2.

Annual Reporting on Attorney Activity.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.1(a), (b), provides: “(a) Beginning on August 1, 2014, and every year thereafter, the Attorney General shall report on the work of Department of Justice attorneys during the previous year. The reports required by this section shall be filed with the Chairs of the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Justice and Public Safety, with the Chairs of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Justice and Public Safety, with the Chairs of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Justice and Public Safety, and with the Fiscal Research Division as follows:

“(1) Litigation. — A report reflecting the amount of time spent by each attorney on litigation. The report shall include the following information:

“a. The amount of time spent working directly on civil litigation in a trial court, administrative forum, or appellate court for each specific State agency, board, commission, official, or other client.

“b. The amount of time spent working directly on civil litigation in a trial court, administrative forum, or appellate court involving cases in which there is not a specific State agency, board, commission, official, or other client named as a defendant.

“c. The amount of time spent working on criminal cases at the trial or appellate level.

“(2) Other work. — A report reflecting the amount of time spent by each attorney providing legal services that did not directly involve litigation. The report shall include the following information:

“a. The amount of time spent providing legal services not directly involving litigation for each specific State agency, board, commission, or other client.

“b. The amount of time spent providing legal services for local government bodies, officials, and citizens.

“(3) Billing. — A report reflecting the amount billed to each State agency, board, commission, or other client as required by G.S. 114-8.2 .

“(b) Reports required by this section shall not include detailed information about the work of individual attorneys but shall instead include only summary information about Department of Justice attorney activity during the relevant period, which shall (i) be set forth using commonly employed measures of central tendency and (ii) which shall highlight and explain extreme deviations from applicable norms.”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2012-142, s. 15.2, was codified as G.S. 114-6.1 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

§ 114-7. Salary of the Attorney General.

The salary of the Attorney General shall be set by the General Assembly in the Current Operations Appropriations Act. In addition to the salary set by the General Assembly in the Current Operations Appropriations Act, longevity pay shall be paid on the same basis as is provided to employees of the State who are subject to the North Carolina Human Resources Act.

History. 1929, c. 1, s. 2; 1947, c. 1043; 1949, c. 1278; 1953, c. 1, s. 2; 1957, c. 1; 1963, c. 1178, s. 3; 1967, c. 1130; c. 1237, s. 3; 1969, c. 1214, s. 3; 1971, c. 912, s. 3; 1973, c. 778, s. 3; 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, s. 18; 1977, c. 802, s. 42.14; 1983, c. 761, s. 209; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1034, s. 164; 1987, c. 738, s. 32(b); 2013-382, s. 9.1(c).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.1(b), provides: “The following entities and positions created by Chapter 126 of the General Statutes are hereby renamed by this act:

“(1) The State Personnel Commission is renamed the ‘North Carolina Human Resources Commission.’

“(2) The Office of State Personnel is renamed the ‘North Carolina Office of State Human Resources.’

“(3) The State Personnel Director is renamed the ‘Director of the North Carolina Office of State Human Resources.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.1(c), provides: “Modification of References. — The Revisor of Statutes shall delete any references in the General Statutes to the State Personnel Act, State Personnel Commission, the State Personnel Director, and the Office of State Personnel (or any derivatives thereof) and substitute references to the North Carolina Human Resources Act, the State Human Resources Commission, the Director of the Office of State Human Resources, and the Office of Human Resources (or the appropriate derivative thereof) to effectuate the renaming set forth in this section wherever conforming changes are necessary.”

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.2, provides: “No action or proceeding pending on the effective date of this section, brought by or against the State Personnel Commission, the Director of the Office of State Personnel, or the Office of State Personnel, shall be affected by any provision of this section, but the same may be prosecuted or defended in the new name of the Commission, Director, and Office. In these actions and proceedings, the renamed Commission, Director, or Office shall be substituted as a party upon proper application to the courts or other public bodies.”

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.3, provides: “Any business or other matter undertaken or commanded by the former State Personnel Commission, State Personnel Director, or Office of State Personnel regarding any State program, office, or contract or pertaining to or connected with their respective functions, powers, obligations, and duties that are pending on the date this act becomes effective may be conducted and completed by the Commission, Director, or Office in the same manner and under the same terms and conditions and with the same effect as if conducted and completed by the formerly named commission, director, or office.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-382, s. 9.1(c), effective August 21, 2013, substituted “North Carolina Human Resources Act” for “State Personnel Act.”

§ 114-8. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1969, c. 44, s. 89.

§ 114-8.1. Attorney General interns.

The Attorney General may select interns to work in the Attorney General’s Office from institutions of higher education, including the constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina. The Attorney General may adopt policies or rules to provide for the selection, tenure, duties, and compensation of these interns.

History. 1985, c. 479, s. 140.

§ 114-8.2. Charges for legal services.

The Department of Justice shall charge State boards and commissions that are totally supported by receipts from fees or surcharges for legal services rendered by the Department to the board or commission. Client State departments, agencies, boards, and commissions shall reimburse the Department of Justice for reasonable court fees, attorney travel and subsistence costs, and other costs directly related to litigation in which the Department of Justice is representing the department, agency, or board.

History. 1989, c. 500, s. 60; 2011-145, s. 16.4.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 16.3, provides: “Client departments, agencies, and boards shall reimburse the Department of Justice for reasonable court fees, attorney travel and subsistence costs, and other costs directly related to litigation in which the Department of Justice is representing the department, agency, or board.”

For similar prior provisions, see Session Laws 2007-323, s. 15.4.

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2009’.”

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2009-2011 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 28.5, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 16.4, effective July 1, 2011, added the last sentence.

§ 114-8.3. Attorney General/General Counsel; review certain contracts.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (b) and (b1) of this section, the Attorney General or the Attorney General’s designee shall perform the duties required pursuant to G.S. 143-49(3a) for proposed contracts for contractual services that exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000). The designee shall confirm that the proposed contracts are (i) in proper legal form, (ii) contain all clauses required by North Carolina law, (iii) are legally enforceable, and (iv) accomplish the intended purposes of the proposed contract. The designee’s review does not constitute approval or disapproval of the policy merit or lack thereof of the proposed contract. For purposes of this subsection, the term “Attorney General’s designee” includes any attorney approved by the Attorney General to review contracts as provided in this subsection. The Attorney General shall:
    1. Establish procedures regarding the review of contracts subject to this section and shall provide any attorney designated under G.S. 143-49(3a) with guidelines to be used in reviewing contracts.
    2. Advise and assist the Contract Management Section of the Division of Purchase and Contract, Department of Administration, in establishing procedures and guidelines for the review of contracts pursuant to G.S. 143-50.1 .
  2. For the constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, the General Counsel of each institution or the General Counsel’s designee shall review all proposed contracts for supplies, materials, printing, equipment, and contractual services that exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000) to ensure that the proposed contracts are (i) in proper legal form, (ii) contain all clauses required by North Carolina law, (iii) are legally enforceable, and (iv) accomplish the intended purposes of the proposed contract. The term “review” as used in this section does not constitute approval or disapproval of the policy merit or lack thereof of the proposed contract. For purposes of this subsection, the term “General Counsel’s designee” includes any attorney approved by the General Counsel to review contracts as provided in this subsection. The General Counsel shall establish procedures regarding the review of contracts subject to this section and shall require that any attorney designated under this subsection comply with any procedures established by the Attorney General or the Department of Administration regarding the review of contracts. (b1) The General Counsel of the Department of State Treasurer or the General Counsel’s designee shall review all proposed investment contracts, as defined in subdivision (4) of this subsection, and all proposed contracts for investment-related services entered pursuant to the State Treasurer’s authority under G.S. 147-69.3 not constituting consulting contracts, to confirm that the proposed contracts (i) are in proper legal form, (ii) contain all clauses required by North Carolina law, (iii) are legally enforceable to the extent governed by North Carolina law, and (iv) accomplish the intended purposes of the proposed contract. The General Counsel shall establish, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Department of Administration, procedures regarding the review of contracts subject to this subsection. The following terms and requirements apply to contracts under this subsection:
    1. The term “review” as used in this section does not constitute approval or disapproval of the policy merit or lack thereof of the proposed contract.
    2. The term “General Counsel’s designee” includes any attorney employed or retained by the General Counsel to review contracts as provided in this subsection.
    3. Any contract for services reviewed pursuant to this subsection must include the signature of the General Counsel or the General Counsel’s designee confirming that the Department of State Treasurer has adhered to the procedures established by the General Counsel regarding the review of the contract. Except for a contract entered into as part of direct trading of bonds, instruments, equity securities, or other approved securities, a contract that has not been signed as required by this subdivision is voidable by the State, and any party or parties to the contract are entitled to receive the value of services rendered prior to the termination of the contract.
    4. For the purposes of this subsection, “investment contract” means any of the following:
      1. Investments to be acquired, held, or sold, directly or indirectly, by or for the State Treasurer, the Department of State Treasurer, or an investment entity created by the Department of State Treasurer, either on its own behalf or on behalf of another beneficial owner.
      2. Investments administered by the North Carolina Supplemental Retirement Board of Trustees.
  3. All State agencies, the constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, or any person who will be entering into a contract on behalf of the State for supplies, materials, printing, equipment, or contractual services that exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000) shall notify the Secretary of the Department of Administration or the Secretary’s designee of the intent to enter into the contract and provide information as required by the Department for the purposes of maintaining a centralized log of contracts and identifying the location of the contract documents.

History. 2010-194, s. 16; 2011-326, s. 15(p); 2013-234, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2010-194, s. 28, made this section effective October 1, 2010, and applicable to all contracts proposed or awarded on or after that date.

Session Laws 2013-234, s. 11, provides: “The Department of Administration shall provide an individualized notice to the following State entities to ensure that the entities are aware of how the statutory amendments made in S.L. 2010-194, Section 15 of S.L. 2011-326, and this act apply to them:

“(1) The North Carolina State Lottery Commission, which is subject to G.S. 18C-150 .

“(2) The Commissioner of Banks, who is subject to G.S. 53-320(d), 53-326(d), 53-391, and 53-401.

“(3) The Commissioner of Insurance, who is subject to G.S. 53-401 , 58-33-30(e)(4) and (5), 58-33-125(e), 58-33-130(a), and 58-71-40(d).

“(4) The Global TransPark Authority, which is subject to G.S. 63A-24 . The Secretary of Transportation shall be copied on the notice sent to the Global TransPark Authority.

“(5) The North Carolina State Bar Council, which is subject to G.S. 84-23(d) .

“(6) The North Carolina Board for Licensing of Geologists, which is subject to G.S. 89E-5(e) .

“(7) The North Carolina Board for Licensing of Soil Scientists, which is subject to G.S. 89F-5(d).

“(8) The constituent institutions of The University of North Carolina, which are subject to G.S. 114-8.3(b) . For notification under this subdivision, the Department of Administration may provide The University of North Carolina system a notification to distribute to all of its constituent institutions. If the Department of Administration does so, The University of North Carolina system shall distribute those notifications to the system’s constituent institutions.

“(9) The North Carolina Center for Applied Textile Technology, which is subject to G.S. 115D-67.4 .

“(10) The North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees, which is subject to G.S. 135-48.33(b).

“(11) The Department of Transportation, which is subject to G.S. 136-28.1(h) and G.S. 143-134(b).

“(12) The North Carolina Turnpike Authority, which is subject to G.S. 136-89.194(g)(1). The Secretary of Transportation shall be copied on the notice sent to the Turnpike Authority.

“(13) The Department of Health and Human Services, which is subject to G.S. 143-48.1(c).

“(14) The Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety, which is subject to G.S. 143-134(b). The Secretary of Public Safety shall be copied on the notice sent to the Division of Adult Correction.

“(15) The North Carolina Code Officials Qualification Board, which is subject to G.S. 143-151.16(d). The Commissioner of Insurance shall be copied on the notice sent to the Code Officials Qualification Board.

“(16) The Roanoke Island Commission, which is subject to G.S. 143B-131.2(b)(15). The Secretary of Cultural Resources shall be copied on the notice sent to the Roanoke Island Commission.

“(17) Any other State entity subject to contract review under G.S. 114-8.3 .

“The Department of Administration, as part of its notice, shall provide a means by which an entity may acknowledge receipt and understanding of the notice. If the Department of Administration has not received an acknowledgement from a State entity within 30 days of sending the notice, the Department of Administration shall send a second notice. If the Department of Administration has not received an acknowledgement from a State entity within 30 days of sending the second notice, the Department of Administration shall notify (i) the Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee and (ii) the House Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government and the Senate Appropriations Committee on General Government and Information Technology.”

Session Laws 2013-234, s. 12, provides: “The Attorney General’s Office, the Department of Administration, and the Office of the General Counsel for The University of North Carolina shall establish procedures to implement the provisions of this act no later than October 1, 2013.”

Session Laws 2013-234, s. 13, made the amendment to this section by Session Laws 2013-234, s. 1, applicable to contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2013.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-326, s. 15(p), effective June 27, 2011, in the first sentence of subsections (a) and (b), deleted “statewide and agency term” following “proposed.”

Session Laws 2013-234, s. 1, effective October 1, 2013, in subsections (a) and (b), added “(i),” “(ii),” “(iii),” “(iv),” and “North Carolina” following “clauses required by,” and substituted “includes” for “shall include” following “’Attorney General’s designee”’; substituted “General/General Counsel” for “General; to” in the section heading; in subsection (a), substituted “subsections (b) and (b1)” for “subsection (b),” “perform the duties required pursuant to G.S. 143-49(3a) for” for “review all,” “five” for “one,” “($5,000,000). The designee shall confirm” for “($1,000,000) to ensure,” and “designee’s review does” for “term ’review’ as used in this section shall,” deleted “supplies, materials, printing, equipment, and” preceding “contractual services,” and added “shall” at the end; redesignated former subsection (a) as present subsection (a) and subdivision (a)(1) and rewrote subdivision (a)(1); added subdivision (a)(2) and subsections (b1) and (c); and in subsection (b), substituted “does” for “shall” in the second sentence, and “procedures” for “rules” in the last sentence, and added “establish procedures regarding the review of contracts subject to this section and shall.” For applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 114-8.4. Legislative assistance to agencies and local governments.

The Department of Justice may (i) prepare bills to be presented to the General Assembly at the request of the Governor and the officials and departments of the State and advise in connection therewith and (ii) advise with and assist counties, cities, and towns in the drafting of legislation to be submitted to the General Assembly.

History. 2011-97, s. 2.

§ 114-8.5. Itemized billing for legal services provided to State agencies.

Whenever the Department of Justice charges a State agency, board, or commission for legal services rendered by the Department, the Department shall do so by providing the agency, board, or commission with an invoice that includes at least all of the following information for all charges:

  1. The case or matter for which the agency, board, or commission is being charged.
  2. The name of each attorney who worked on each case or matter and the number of hours worked by each attorney.
  3. The hourly rate being charged by each attorney.

History. 2012-142, s. 15.1.

§ 114-8.6. Designation of State Crime Laboratory as Internet Crimes Against Children affiliated agency.

The Attorney General shall designate the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory as a North Carolina Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) affiliated agency.

History. 2013-360, s. 17.6(p).

§ 114-8.7. Reports of animal cruelty and animal welfare violations.

  1. The Attorney General shall establish a hotline to receive reports of allegations of animal cruelty or violations of the Animal Welfare Act, Article 3 of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes, against animals under private ownership, by means including telephone, electronic mail, and Internet Web site. The Attorney General shall periodically publicize the hotline telephone number, electronic mail address, Internet Web site address, and any other means by which the Attorney General may receive reports of allegations of animal cruelty or violations of the Animal Welfare Act. Any individual who makes a report under this section shall disclose his or her name and telephone number and any other information the Attorney General may require.
  2. When the Attorney General receives allegations involving activity that the Attorney General determines may involve cruelty to animals under private ownership in violation of Article 47 of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, the allegations shall be referred to the appropriate local animal control authority for the unit or units of local government within which the violations are alleged to have occurred. When the Attorney General receives allegations involving activity that the Attorney General determines may involve violations of the Animal Welfare Act, the allegations shall be referred to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The Attorney General shall record the total number of reports received on the hotline and the number of reports received against any individual on the hotline.
  3. Notwithstanding other provisions of law, the Department of Justice is authorized to spend any federal, State, local, or private funds available for this purpose to administer the provisions of this section.
  4. Notwithstanding G.S. 147-33.72 C and related provisions of law, in order to expedite the timely implementation of technology systems to record and manage public allegations and complaints received pursuant to this section, the Department of Justice is exempted from external agency project approval standards.

History. 2015-286, s. 4.36(a).

Article 2. Division of Legislative Drafting and Codification of Statutes. [Repealed]

§§ 114-9, 114-9.1.

Recodified as Article 7D of Chapter 120, G.S. 120-36.21 and G.S. 120-36.22 , by Session Laws 2011-97, s. 1, effective June 1, 2011.

Article 2A. Transparency in Third-Party Contracting by Attorney General.

§ 114-9.2. Title.

This Article shall be known and may be cited as the “Transparency in Private Attorney Contracts Act (TIPAC).”

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.3. Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this Article:

  1. Contingency fee contract. — A contract entered into by a State agency to retain private counsel that contains a contingency fee arrangement, including, but not limited to, pure contingency fee agreements and hybrid agreements, including a contingency fee aspect.
  2. Government attorney. — An attorney employed by the State as a staff attorney in a State agency.
  3. Private attorney. — An attorney in private practice or employed by a private law firm.
  4. State. — The State of North Carolina, including State officers, departments, boards, commissions, divisions, bureaus, councils, and units of organization, however designated, of the executive branch of State government and any of its agents.
  5. State agency. — Every agency, institution, department, bureau, board, or commission of the State of North Carolina authorized by law to retain private counsel.

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.4. Procurement.

  1. A State agency may not enter into a contingency fee contract with a private attorney unless the Attorney General makes a written determination prior to entering into the contract that contingency fee representation is both cost-effective and in the public interest. Any written determination shall include specific findings for each of the following factors:
    1. Whether there exist sufficient and appropriate legal and financial resources within the Attorney General’s office to handle the matter.
    2. The time and labor required; the novelty, complexity, and difficulty of the questions involved; and the skill requisite to perform the attorney services properly.
    3. The geographic area where the attorney services are to be provided.
    4. The amount of experience desired for the particular kind of attorney services to be provided and the nature of the private attorney’s experience with similar issues or cases.
  2. If the Attorney General makes the determination described in subsection (a) of this section, the Attorney General shall request proposals from private attorneys to represent the State agency on a contingency fee basis and draft a written request for proposals from private attorneys, unless the Attorney General determines that requesting proposals is not feasible under the circumstances and sets forth the basis for this determination in writing. A request for proposals under this provision is not subject to Article 3 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes. Until the conclusion of the legal proceeding or other matter for which the services of the private attorney were sought, all proposals received shall be maintained by the Attorney General and shall not be deemed a public record within the meaning of Chapter 132 of the General Statutes. All proposals maintained under this subsection shall be made available to the State Auditor for oversight purposes, upon request.
  3. A private attorney who submits a proposal under this section shall simultaneously pay a fee in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00). All fees collected under this subsection shall be used for the maintenance of the Attorney General’s Web site.

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.5. Contingency Fees.

  1. The Attorney General may not give permission under G.S. 114-2.3 for a State agency to enter into a contingency fee contract that provides for the private attorney to receive an aggregate contingency fee, exclusive of reasonable costs and expenses, in excess of:
    1. Twenty-five percent (25%) of any damages up to ten million dollars ($10,000,000); plus
    2. Twenty percent (20%) of any portion of such damages between ten million dollars ($10,000,000) and fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000); plus
    3. Fifteen percent (15%) of any portion of such damages between fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) and twenty million dollars ($20,000,000); plus
    4. Ten percent (10%) of any portion of such damages between twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) and twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000); plus
    5. Five percent (5%) of any portion of such damages exceeding twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).
  2. In no event shall the aggregate contingency fee exceed fifty million dollars ($50,000,000), exclusive of reasonable costs and expenses, and irrespective of the number of lawsuits filed or the number of private attorneys retained to achieve the recovery.
  3. A contingency fee shall not be based on penalties or civil fines awarded or any amounts attributable to penalties or civil fines.

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.6. Control.

  1. Decisions regarding disposition of the case are reserved exclusively to the discretion of the State agency in consultation with a government attorney.
  2. The Attorney General shall develop a standard addendum to every contract for contingency fee attorney services that shall be used in all cases, describing in detail what is expected of both the contracted private attorney and the State agency, including, without limitation, the requirement listed in subsection (a) of this section.

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.7. Oversight.

  1. Until the conclusion of the legal proceeding or other matter for which the services of the private attorney have been retained, the executed contingency fee contract and the Attorney General’s written determination pursuant to G.S. 114-9.4 shall not be deemed a public record within the meaning of Chapter 132 of the General Statutes. All records maintained under this subsection shall be made available to the State Auditor for oversight purposes, upon request.
  2. The amount of any payment of contingency fees pursuant to a contingency fee contract subject to this Article shall be posted on the Attorney General’s Web site within 15 days after the payment of those contingency fees to the private attorney and shall remain posted on the Web site for at least 365 days thereafter.
  3. Any private attorney under contract to provide services to a State agency on a contingency fee basis shall maintain all records related to the contract in accordance with the Revised North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct.
  4. By February 1 of each year following a year in which a State agency entered into a contingency fee contract with a private attorney, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives describing the use of contingency fee contracts with private attorneys in the preceding calendar year. To the fullest extent possible without waiving the evidentiary privileges of the State in any pending matters, the report shall:
    1. Identify each new contingency fee contract entered into during the year and each previously executed contingency fee contract that remains current during any part of the year.
    2. Include the name of the private attorney with whom the department has contracted in each instance, including the name of the attorney’s law firm.
    3. Describe the nature and status of the legal matter that is the subject of each contract.
    4. Provide the name of the parties to each legal matter.
    5. Disclose the amount of recovery.
    6. Disclose the amount of any contingency fee paid.
    7. Include copies of any written determinations made under G.S. 114-9.4 .

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

§ 114-9.8. No expansion of authority.

Nothing in this Article shall be construed to expand the authority of any State agency or officer or employee of this State to enter into contracts for legal representation where no authority previously existed.

History. 2014-110, s. 1.1.

Article 3. Division of Criminal Information. [Repealed]

§§ 114-10 through 114-10.1.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-902 through 143B-905 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(h), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(a), provides: “The Division of Criminal Information of the Department of Justice is hereby transferred to the Department of Public Safety. This transfer shall have all of the elements of a Type I transfer, as described in G.S. 143A-6 .”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: ‘This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-11. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1969, c. 1190, s. 57.

§ 114-11.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1965, c. 310, s. 4.

§§ 114-11.2 through 114-11.5.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 3A. Special Prosecution Division.

§ 114-11.6. Division established; duties.

There is hereby established in the office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, a Special Prosecution Division. The attorneys assigned to this Division shall be available to prosecute or assist in the prosecution of criminal cases when requested to do so by a district attorney and the Attorney General approves. In addition, these attorneys assigned to this Division shall serve as legal advisers to the State Bureau of Investigation and the Police Information Network and perform any other duties assigned to them by the Attorney General.

History. 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 813.

CASE NOTES

Provision authorizing attorneys in the Special Prosecution Division to “perform any other duties assigned to them by the Attorney General” merely authorizes the Attorney General to delegate those duties which he is elsewhere authorized to perform. It creates no independent authority in its own right. State v. Felts, 79 N.C. App. 205, 339 S.E.2d 99, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987 (1986).

When this section is read in pari materia with N.C. Const., Art. IV, § 18, it is apparent that our Constitution and statutes give the district attorneys of the State the exclusive discretion and authority to determine whether to request, and thus permit, the prosecution of any individual case by the Special Prosecution Division. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

This section authorizes the several elected district attorneys of the State to permit the Special Prosecution Division of the Office of the Attorney General to prosecute individual criminal cases in their prosecutorial districts. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

This section allows special prosecutors to prosecute or assist district attorneys in the prosecution of criminal cases only. It does not authorize the Attorney General or his designate to bring a proceeding, under G.S. 128-16 et seq., for removal of a sheriff or police officer. State v. Felts, 79 N.C. App. 205, 339 S.E.2d 99, 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 1987 (1986).

The trial court exceeded its authority and invaded the province of an independent constitutional officer when it ordered the district attorney to request that the Attorney General prosecute defendant in a capital case. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

Authority of Trial Court Exceeded. —

In passing this section, the General Assembly made it clear that even upon a proper request and authorization by a district attorney, the Special Prosecution Division is to participate in criminal prosecutions only if the Attorney General, in his sole discretion as an independent constitutional officer, approves. Thus trial court exceeded its authority when it ordered that “the Attorney General’s Office shall immediately assume the prosecution of ” a capital case. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

The trial court exceeded its authority by ordering that in order to avoid the possibility or impression of any conflict of interest, the district attorney and his entire staff must withdraw from a capital case and have no further participation either directly or indirectly with regard to the case. State v. Camacho, 329 N.C. 589 , 406 S.E.2d 868, 1991 N.C. LEXIS 535 (1991).

Article 4. State Bureau of Investigation.

Part 1. General Powers and Duties of the State Bureau of Investigation.

§ 114-12.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-915 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(b), provides: “The remainder of the State Bureau of Investigation is hereby transferred to the Department of Public Safety as a new section within the Law Enforcement Division. This transfer shall have all of the elements of a Type II transfer, as described in G.S. 143A-6 , except as provided in G.S. 143B-927 , as enacted by subsection (ttt) of this section.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-12.1. Minority sensitivity training for law enforcement personnel. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. The Department of Justice shall develop guidelines for minority sensitivity training for all law enforcement personnel throughout the State.  The Department shall ensure that all persons who work with minority juveniles in the juvenile justice system are taught how to communicate effectively with minority juveniles and how to recognize and address the needs of those juveniles.  The Department shall also advise all law enforcement and professionals who work within the juvenile justice system of ways to improve the treatment of minority juveniles so that all juveniles receive equal treatment.  Except where local law enforcement has existing minority sensitivity training that meets the Department guidelines, the Department shall conduct the minority sensitivity training annually. Prior to the training each year, the Department shall assess whether minorities are receiving fair and equal treatment in the juvenile justice system with regard to the administration of predisposition procedures, of diversion methods, of dispositional alternatives, and of treatment and post-release supervision plans.
  2. The Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety shall ensure that all juvenile court counselors and other Division personnel receive the minority sensitivity training specified in subsection (a) of this section.

History. 1998-202, s. 17; 2000-137, s. 4(i); 2003-214, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2017-186, s. 2(wwww).

Section Set Out Twice.

The section above is effective until January 1, 2023. For the section as amended January 1, 2023, see the following section, also numbered G.S. 114-12.1 .

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1998-202, s. 17(a) and (b), were codified as this section at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2003-214, s. 1(4), effective June 19, 2003, recodified former G.S. 114-21 as present G.S. 114-12.1 .

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1( l ), effective January 1, 2012, substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” for “Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention” in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(wwww), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” at the beginning of subsection (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 114-12.1. Minority sensitivity training for law enforcement personnel. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. The Department of Justice shall develop guidelines for minority sensitivity training for all law enforcement personnel throughout the State.  The Department shall ensure that all persons who work with minority juveniles in the juvenile justice system are taught how to communicate effectively with minority juveniles and how to recognize and address the needs of those juveniles.  The Department shall also advise all law enforcement and professionals who work within the juvenile justice system of ways to improve the treatment of minority juveniles so that all juveniles receive equal treatment.  Except where local law enforcement has existing minority sensitivity training that meets the Department guidelines, the Department shall conduct the minority sensitivity training annually. Prior to the training each year, the Department shall assess whether minorities are receiving fair and equal treatment in the juvenile justice system with regard to the administration of predisposition procedures, of diversion methods, of dispositional alternatives, and of treatment and post-release supervision plans.
  2. The Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety shall ensure that all juvenile court counselors and other Division personnel receive the minority sensitivity training specified in subsection (a) of this section.

History. 1998-202, s. 17; 2000-137, s. 4(i); 2003-214, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2017-186, s. 2(wwww); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z).

Section Set Out Twice.

The section above is effective January 1, 2023. For the section as in effect until January 1, 2023, see the preceding section, also numbered G.S. 114-12.1 .

The section above is effective January 1, 2023. For the section as in effect until January 1, 2023, see the main volume.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1998-202, s. 17(a) and (b), were codified as this section at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2003-214, s. 1(4), effective June 19, 2003, recodified former G.S. 114-21 as present G.S. 114-12.1 .

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1( l ), effective January 1, 2012, substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” for “Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention” in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(wwww), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” at the beginning of subsection (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 114-13. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(f), effective July 1, 2014.

History. 1937, c. 349, s. 4; 1939, c. 315, s. 6; 1955, c. 1185, s. 1; 1957, c. 269, s. 1; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1272, s. 3; 2003-214, s. 1(1); 2011-145, s. 19.1(q1); 2011-391, s. 43(g); repealed by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(f), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Former G.S. 114-13 pertained to the Director of the Bureau of Investigation and personnel.

§ 114-14.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-917 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-14.1.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-918 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§§ 114-15 through 114-15.3.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-919 through 143B-922 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

§§ 114-16 through 114-16.2.

Recodified as Article 9 of Chapter 114, G.S. 114-60 through 114-62, by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), effective July 1, 2013.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), effective July 1, 2013, provides: “G.S. 114-16 through G.S. 114-16 .2 are recodified as G.S. 114-60 through G.S. 114-62 under Article 9 of Chapter 114 of the General Statutes, as created by subsection (c) of this section.”

§ 114-17.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-923 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-17.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1995, c. 507, s. 6.

§ 114-18.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-924 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(j), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-18.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2000-119, s. 6, effective December 1, 2000.

Cross References.

As to duty of local and State law enforcement agencies to report, within 48 hours, seizures of unauthorized substances and arrests for possession of unauthorized substances, see G.S. 105-113.108(b).

§ 114-19.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-906 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(k), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Part 2. Criminal History Record Checks.

§ 114-19.01.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-925 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1( l ), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-19.1.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-930 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(m), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§§ 114-19.2 through 114-19.34.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-931 through 143B-965 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(m), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§§ 114-19.35 through 114-19.49.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-966 through 143B-980 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(m), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-19.50.

Recodified as G.S. 143B-981 by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(m), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Part 3. Protection of Public Officials.

§§ 114-20, 114-20.1.

Recodified as Subpart E of Part 4 of Article 13 of Chapter 143B, G.S. 143B-986 and G.S. 143B-987 , by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(n), effective July 1, 2014.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(n), effective July 1, 2014, provides: “Part 3 of Article 4 of Chapter 114 of the General Statutes is recodified as Subpart E of Part 4 of Article 13 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes, ‘Protection of Public Officials,’ G.S. 143B-986 through G.S. 143B-987 .”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-21.

Recodified as G.S. 114-12.1 by Session Laws 2003-214, s. 1(4), effective June 19, 2003.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2003-214, s. 1(3), effective June 19, 2003, redesignated G.S. 114-20 through 114-21 as Part 3 of Article 4 of Chapter 114, under the heading “Protection of Public Officials.”

Session Laws 2003-214, s. 1(4) recodified former G.S. 114-21 as present G.S. 114-12.1 .

§§ 114-22 through 114-25.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 5. Law Enforcement Officers’ Minimum Salary Act. [Repealed]

§§ 114-26 through 114-39. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1983, c. 781.

Editor’s Note.

This Article was codified from Session Laws 1973, c. 766, as amended by Session Laws 1975, c. 903, and Session Laws 1977, c. 931, and expired by the terms of Session Laws 1977, c. 931, s. 1, on June 30, 1982. It was repealed by Session Laws 1983, c. 781, effective July 18, 1983.

Former sections 114-38, 114-39 had been reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 6. Office of the Inspector General. [Repealed]

§§ 114-40 through 114-42. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-424, s. 23.10, effective January 1, 2002.

Article 7. Methamphetamine Watch Program.

§ 114-43. Methamphetamine Watch Program — good faith actions immune from civil and criminal liability.

Anyone who, in good faith, does any of the acts listed in subdivisions (1) through (3) of this section as part of a Methamphetamine Watch Program approved by the Department of Justice is immune from any civil or criminal liability that might otherwise be incurred or imposed for that action. In any proceeding involving liability, good faith is presumed. The actions for which immunity is granted under this section are as follows:

  1. The person files a report with a law enforcement agency concerning the purchase or theft of ingredients used to manufacture methamphetamine.
  2. The person cooperates in any law enforcement investigation concerning the manufacture of methamphetamine.
  3. The person testifies in any judicial proceeding concerning the manufacture of methamphetamine.

History. 2004-178, s. 9.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2004-178, s. 10 provides: “Sections 1 through 6 of this act and Section 8 of this act become effective December 1, 2004, and apply to offenses committed on or after that date. Prosecutions for offenses occurring before the effective date of this act are not abated or affected by this act, and the statutes that would be applicable but for this act remain applicable to those prosecutions. Section 7 of this act becomes effective January 1, 2005. The remainder of this act is effective when it becomes law, at which time the Commission for Health Services [now the Commission for Public Health] may adopt rules under Section 7 of this act.”

§§ 114-44 through 114-49.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 8. Financial Literacy Council.

§ 114-50. Financial Literacy Council established; purpose.

There is established within the Department of Justice the North Carolina Financial Literacy Council (Council). The Council shall monitor and assist the Department of Public Instruction in the coordination of statewide delivery of financial education within the public school system, shall identify programs designed to increase the financial literacy of North Carolinians outside the public school system, and shall work to expand access to financial education resources and programs in communities across North Carolina.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§ 114-51. Membership; terms; quorum.

  1. The Council shall consist of 18 members appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Governor. The Governor shall designate a chair from among the members of the Council. Membership shall be as follows:
    1. Ten members from government agencies with responsibility for programs and services related to financial education, financial services, and related economic stability efforts. At least one representative shall come from each of the following government agencies:
      1. Community College System.
      2. Department of Commerce.
      3. Department of Justice.
      4. Department of Labor.
      5. Department of Public Instruction.
      6. Department of the Secretary of State.
      7. Department of State Treasurer.
      8. Office of the Commissioner of Banks.
      9. The University of North Carolina.
    2. Two public members with experience in the financial services industry.
    3. Two public members who represent employers with experience in providing financial education to their employees.
    4. Four public members with experience in consumer advocacy or nonprofit financial education.
  2. Members of the Council shall be appointed for terms of three years and shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified.
  3. A majority of the Council’s members shall constitute a quorum.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§ 114-52. Staffing.

The Department of Justice shall provide administrative and staff support to the Council.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§ 114-53. Duties.

The Council shall meet at least quarterly and shall perform the following duties:

  1. Study and document current financial education programs in North Carolina and best practices across the country.
  2. Coordinate activities related to financial education and asset building that occur within various government agencies, private enterprise, and the nonprofit sector to ensure dissemination of resources and information to households across the State.
  3. Propose public and private policy, organizational changes, and systemic changes to ensure all North Carolinians have access to training about necessary financial skills and experience with financial services.
  4. Consider and make recommendations specifically to address the following issues:
    1. Current personal financial literacy programs in the public schools and how to integrate financial education in K-12 to ensure that young people are prepared for financial success.
    2. Unique financial issues facing students in higher education and how to address those issues through the community colleges and public and private university systems.
    3. Creation of and access to financial products that provide hands-on learning of financial skills.
  5. Monitor the outcomes of financial education programs, focusing specifically on the following indicators: improved financial knowledge, improved financial behaviors, and increased access to and use of affordable financial services.
  6. Use the talents, expertise, and resources within the State, especially those of the public schools, community colleges, and public and private university systems, as well as the bank and credit union industries, to further its mission.
  7. Report annually to the General Assembly and the Governor on the performance of its prescribed duties and on the impact of the financial education activities conducted by State agencies.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§ 114-54. Compensation and expenses of members.

Public members of the Financial Literacy Council may receive subsistence and travel expenses at the rates set forth in G.S. 138-5 or G.S. 138-6 , as appropriate.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§ 114-55. State officers, etc., upon request, to furnish data and information to the Council.

Except as provided in G.S. 105-259 , all officers, agents, agencies, and departments of the State are required to give to the Council, upon request, all information and all data that are within their possession or ascertainable from their records and that are pertinent to financial education activities.

History. 2009-265, s. 1.

§§ 114-56 through 114-59.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 9. North Carolina State Crime Laboratory.

§ 114-60. Laboratory and clinical facilities; employment of criminologists; services of scientists, etc., employed by State; radio system.

In the Department of Justice there shall be provided laboratory facilities for the analysis of evidences of crime, including the determination of presence, quantity and character of poisons, the character of bloodstains, microscopic and other examination material associated with the commission of crime, examination and analysis of projectiles of ballistic imprints and records which might lead to the determination or identification of criminals, the examination and identification of fingerprints, and other evidence leading to the identification, apprehension, or conviction of criminals. A sufficient number of persons skilled in such matters shall be employed to render a reasonable service to the public through the criminal justice system and to the criminal justice system in the discharge of their duties.

The laboratory and clinical facilities of the institutions of the State, both educational and departmental, shall be made available to the Laboratory, and scientists and doctors now working for the State through its institutions and departments may be called upon by the Governor to aid the Laboratory in the evaluation, preparation, and preservation of evidence in which scientific methods are employed, and a reasonable fee may be allowed by the Governor for such service.

History. 1937, c. 349, s. 7; 2003-214, s. 1(1); 2011-19, s. 10; 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), (m).

Editor’s Note.

This section is former G.S. 114-16 , as recodified by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), effective July 1, 2013.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.2, provides: “Beginning on October 1, 2013, and yearly thereafter, the Attorney General shall report on the work of the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory during the previous fiscal year. The reports required by this section shall be filed with the Chairs of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Justice and Public Safety and with the Fiscal Research Division. Each report shall include at least the following:

“(1) Information about the workload of the Laboratory during the previous fiscal year, including the number of submissions, identified by forensic discipline, received at each location of the Laboratory.

“(2) Information about the number of cases completed in the previous fiscal year, identified by forensic discipline, at each location of the Laboratory.

“(3) A breakdown by county of the number of submissions received by the Laboratory in the previous fiscal year.

“(4) An average estimate of the dollar and time cost to perform each type of procedure and analysis performed by the Laboratory.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.5, provides: “The Department of Justice shall not hire sworn personnel to fill vacant positions in the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the termination of sworn personnel, but as vacant positions in the State Laboratory are filled, they shall be filled only with nonsworn personnel. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect North Carolina State Crime Laboratory personnel who are sworn and employed by the Laboratory as of the effective date of this section and who continue to meet the sworn status retention standards mandated by the NC Criminal Justice Education and Standards Commission.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(a), provides: “The North Carolina State Crime Laboratory and the State DNA Database and Databank are hereby transferred from the State Bureau of Investigation and shall be relocated elsewhere within the Department of Justice, as determined by the Attorney General.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(b), provides: “No later than July 1, 2014, the Department of Justice shall begin budgeting the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory in a fund code that is separate from the remainder of the Department of Justice.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), effective July 1, 2013, provides: “G.S. 114-16 through G.S. 114-16 .2 are recodified as G.S. 114-60 through G.S. 114-62 under Article 9 of Chapter 114 of the General Statutes, as created by subsection (c) of this section.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 18B.5 provides: “The School of Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in cooperation with the Administrative Office of the Courts, the North Carolina Association of District Court Judges, the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges, and the State Crime Laboratory, shall ensure that the continuing judicial education programs coordinated by the School of Government incorporate content related to the proper custody and handling of biological evidence, including relevant information about the work of the State Crime Laboratory. The topic shall be addressed in continuing legal education programs for superior and district court judges on a regular basis.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2014.’ ”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2014-2015 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 17.1, provides: “The Department of Justice shall not hire sworn personnel to fill vacant positions in the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the termination of sworn personnel, but as vacant positions in the State Crime Laboratory are filled, they shall be filled only with nonsworn personnel. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect North Carolina State Crime Laboratory personnel who are sworn and employed by the Laboratory as of the effective date of this section and who continue to meet the sworn status retention standards mandated by the North Carolina Criminal Justice Education and Standards Commission.” Session Laws 2015-241 became effective July 1, 2015.

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2015.’ ”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2015-2017 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2015-241, s. 33.6, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(m), effective July 1, 2013, substituted “Department of Justice” for “said Bureau,” added “through the criminal justice system” and “to” preceding “the criminal justice system,” and deleted the last sentence in the first paragraph, which formerly read “In the personnel of the Bureau shall be included a sufficient number of persons of training and skill in the investigation of crime and in the preparation of evidence as to be of service to local enforcement officers, under the direction of the Governor, in criminal matters of major importance,” in the second paragraph, substituted “Laboratory” for “Bureau” twice, and deleted the third paragraph, which formerly read “The State radio system shall be made available to the Bureau for use in its work.”

§ 114-61. Forensic Science Advisory Board.

  1. Creation and Membership. —  The North Carolina Forensic Science Advisory Board (Board) is hereby established as an advisory board within the Department of Justice. The Board shall consist of 15 members, consisting of the State Crime Laboratory Director, and 14 members appointed by the Attorney General as follows:
    1. A forensic scientist or any other person with an advanced degree who has received substantial education, training, or experience in the subject of laboratory standards or quality assurance regulation and monitoring.
    2. The Chief Medical Examiner of the State.
    3. A forensic scientist with an advanced degree who has education, training, or experience in the discipline of molecular biology.
    4. A forensic scientist with an advanced degree who has experience in the discipline of population genetics.
    5. A scientist with an advanced degree who has experience in the discipline of forensic chemistry.
    6. A scientist with an advanced degree who has experience in the discipline of forensic biology.
    7. A forensic scientist or any other person with an advanced degree who has education, training, or experience in the discipline of trace evidence.
    8. A scientist with an advanced degree who has experience in the discipline of forensic toxicology.
    9. A member of the International Association for Identification.
    10. A member of the Association of Firearms and Tool Mark Examiners.
    11. A member of the International Association for Chemical Testing.
    12. Repealed by Session Laws 2014-115, s. 46, effective August 11, 2014.
    13. A member of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors.
    14. A member of the Academy of Forensic Sciences.
    15. A member of the American Statistical Association.A chairman shall be elected from among the members appointed, and staff shall be provided by the Department of Justice.
  2. Meetings. —  The Board shall meet biannually and at such other times and places as it determines. Members of the Board cannot designate a proxy to vote in their absence.
  3. Terms. —  Members of the Board initially appointed shall serve the following terms: five members shall serve a term of two years; five members shall serve a term of three years; and five members shall serve a term of four years. Thereafter, all appointments shall be for a term of four years. A vacancy other than by expiration of term shall be filled by the Attorney General for the unexpired term. Members of the Board cannot designate a proxy to vote in their absence.
  4. Expenses. —  Members of the Board shall be paid reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties. Members of the Board who are State officers or employees shall receive no compensation for serving on the Board but may be reimbursed for their expenses in accordance with G.S. 138-6 . Members of the Board who are full-time salaried public officers or employees other than State officers or employees shall receive no compensation for serving on the Board but may be reimbursed for their expenses in accordance with G.S. 138-5(b) . All other members of the Board may receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses in accordance with G.S. 138-5 .
  5. Functions. —  The Board may review State Crime Laboratory operations and make recommendations concerning the services furnished to user agencies. The Board shall review and make recommendations as necessary to the Laboratory Director concerning any of the following:
    1. New scientific programs, protocols, and methods of testing.
    2. Plans for the implementation of new programs; sustaining existing programs and improving upon them where possible; and the elimination of programs which are no longer needed.
    3. Protocols for testing and examination methods and guidelines for the presentation of results in court.
    4. Qualification standards for the various forensic scientists of the Laboratory.
  6. Review Process. —  Upon request of the Laboratory Director, the Board shall review analytical work, reports, and conclusions of scientists employed by the Laboratory. Records reviewed by this Board retain their confidential status and continue to be considered records of a criminal investigation as defined in G.S. 132-1.4 . These records shall be reviewed only in a closed session meeting pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11 of the Board, and each member of the Board shall, prior to receiving any documents to review, sign a confidentiality agreement agreeing to maintain the confidentiality of and not to disclose the documents nor the contents of the documents reviewed. The Board shall recommend to the Laboratory a review process to use when there is a request that the Laboratory retest or reexamine evidence that has been previously examined by the Laboratory.

History. 2011-19, s. 2; 2013-360, s. 17.6(d); 2014-115, s. 46.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-19, s. 1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Forensic Sciences Act of 2011.’ ”

Session Laws 2011-19, s. 3, provides: “The State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) shall encourage and seek collaborative opportunities and grant funds for research programs, in association, whenever possible, with the university system or independent nationally recognized forensic institutions, on human observer bias and sources of human error in forensic examinations. Such programs might include studies to determine the effects of contextual bias in forensic practice (e.g., studies to determine whether and to what extent the results of forensic analysis are influenced by knowledge regarding the background of the suspect and the investigator’s theory of the case). In addition, research on sources of human error should be closely linked with research conducted to quantify and characterize the amount of error. Based on the results of these studies, and in consultation with the North Carolina Forensic Sciences Advisory Board, the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory should develop standard operating procedures (that will lay the foundation for model protocols) to minimize, to the extent possible, potential bias and sources of human error in forensic science. These standard operating procedures should apply to all forensic analyses that may be used in litigation.”

Session Laws 2011-19, s. 4, as amended by Session Laws 2011-307, s. 8, and as amended by Session Laws 2012-168, s. 6.1, provides: “Forensic Scientists I, II, and III, forensic science supervisors, and forensic scientist managers at the State Crime Laboratory shall be required to obtain individual certification consistent with international and ISO standards within 18 months of the date the scientist becomes eligible to seek certification according to the standards of the certifying entity or by January 1, 2013, or as soon as practicable after that date unless no certification is available. All such forensic scientists shall have access to the certification process.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-115, s. 46, effective August 11, 2014, in subsection (a), substituted “15” for “16” and “14” for “15” in the introductory paragraph, deleted “received substantial” preceding “education” in subdivisions (a)(3) and (a)(7), in subdivision (a)(8) substituted “an advanced” for “a doctoral” and deleted “and is certified by the American Board of Forensic Toxicologists” following “toxicology”, substituted “Tool Mark” for “Toolmark” in subdivision (a)(10) and deleted (a)(12); and substituted “biannually” for “quarterly” in subsection (b).

§ 114-62. North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Ombudsman.

The position of ombudsman is created in the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory within the North Carolina Department of Justice. The primary purpose of this position shall be to work with defense counsel, prosecutorial agencies, criminal justice system stakeholders, law enforcement officials, and the general public to ensure all processes, procedures, practices, and protocols at the State Crime Laboratory are consistent with State and federal law, best forensic law practices, and in the best interests of justice in this State. The ombudsman shall mediate complaints brought to the attention of the ombudsman between the Crime Laboratory and defense counsel, prosecutorial agencies, law enforcement agencies, and the general public. The ombudsman shall ensure all criminal justice stakeholders and the general public are aware of the availability, responsibilities, and role of the ombudsman and shall regularly attend meetings of the Conferences of the District Attorneys, District and Superior Court Judges, Public Defenders, the Advocates for Justice, and Bar Criminal Law Sections. The ombudsman shall make recommendations on a regular basis to the Director of the State Crime Laboratory and the Attorney General of North Carolina as to policies, procedures, practices, and training of employees needed at the Laboratory to ensure compliance with State and federal law, best forensic law practices, and to resolve any meritorious systemic complaints received by the ombudsman.

History. 2011-19, s. 6(a); 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), (n).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-19, s. 1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Forensic Sciences Act of 2011.’ ”

Session Laws 2011-19, s. 6(b), provides: “The funds for the position of ombudsman created in Section 6(a) of this act [G.S. 114-16.2] shall be provided by the Department of Justice from other funds appropriated to the Department, and from other grants or funding that are available from other sources.”

This section is former G.S. 114-16.2, as recodified by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(d), effective July 1, 2013.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 17.6(n), effective July 1, 2013, substituted “Crime Laboratory” for “SBI” in the third sentence, and substituted “State Crime Laboratory and the Attorney General” for “State Crime Laboratory, Director of the SBI, and Attorney General” in the last sentence.

§ 114-63. Transfer of personnel.

The Director of the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory shall have authority to transfer employees of the Crime Laboratory from one Crime Laboratory location in the State to another, or between Sections of the Laboratory, as the Director may deem necessary. When any member of the Crime Laboratory is transferred from one location to another for the convenience of the Crime Laboratory, or otherwise than upon the request of the employee, the Crime Laboratory shall be responsible for transporting the household goods, furniture, and personal effects of the employee and members of his or her household.

History. 2013-360, s. 17.6(q); 2014-100, s. 17.7(b).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.7(b), effective July 1, 2014, inserted “or between Sections of the Laboratory” in the first sentence.

§ 114-63.1. No hiring of sworn personnel to fill vacant positions.

The Department of Justice shall not hire sworn personnel to fill vacant positions in the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the termination of sworn personnel or to affect North Carolina State Crime Laboratory personnel who are sworn and employed by the Laboratory as of July 1, 2021 and who continue to meet the sworn status retention standards mandated by the North Carolina Criminal Justice Education and Standards Commission.

History. 2021-180, s. 18.1.

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.8, made this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 18.1, effective July 1, 2021.

At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, “July 1, 2021” was substituted for “the effective date of this section” in the second sentence of this section.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021’.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

§ 114-64. SBI and State Crime Laboratory access to view and analyze recordings.

Any State or local law enforcement agency that uses the services of the State Bureau of Investigation or the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory to analyze a recording covered by G.S. 132-1.4 A shall, at no cost, provide access to a method to view and analyze the recording upon request of the State Bureau of Investigation or the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory.

History. 2016-88, s. 2(c).

Cross References.

As to various similar provisions pertaining to SBI and State Crime Laboratory access to view and analyze recordings, see Article 8A of Chapter 15A, G.S. 153A-458 , and G.S. 160A-490.1 .

As to law enforcement agency recordings, see G.S. 132-1.4 A.

§ 114-65. Statewide sexual assault evidence collection kit tracking system.

  1. Legislative Intent. —  The General Assembly finds that the preservation and testing of sexual assault evidence collection kits (SAECK or “kit”) are important to public safety. Timely testing is vital to solve cases, punish offenders, bring justice to victims, and prevent future crimes. It is the intent of the General Assembly that every sexual assault evidence collection kit in North Carolina be tested. Sexual assault victims deserve no less.
  2. Establishment of System. —  There is established in the State Crime Laboratory the Statewide Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kit Tracking System (the System). All sexual assault evidence collection kits purchased or distributed under G.S. 143B-1201 on or after October 1, 2018, shall be trackable and shall comply with the requirements of the System. The Director of the State Crime Laboratory (Director) shall implement protocols and administer the System. The Secretary of the Department of Public Safety (Secretary) shall adopt rules, guidelines, and sanctions, for agencies required to participate in the System under this section. The Director shall guidelines for agencies required to participate in the System under this section. The Director shall ensure that the System protects victim information against disclosure to nonparticipating agencies. Except as otherwise required for reporting under subsection (f) of this section, information maintained in the System is confidential and not a public record as defined in G.S. 132-1 .
  3. Required Participation. —  All medical providers, law enforcement agencies, forensic laboratories, or other persons or entities having custody or use of any sexual assault evidence collection kit in the State shall participate in the System and comply with the established protocols, rules, and guidelines. A participating entity shall be permitted to access the entity’s tracking information through the System.
  4. Victim’s Access to View Status of Kit. —  It is the policy of the State to ensure that a victim of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault is able to track the location of the sexual assault evidence collection kit used to conduct the victim’s forensic medical examination and that the victim is also able to determine whether forensic testing of the kit has been completed.
  5. Tracking of Previously Untested Kits. —  The Director shall implement protocols and the Secretary shall adopt rules and guidelines to ensure that previously untested sexual assault evidence collection kits are trackable and are entered into the System. Any law enforcement agency, medical provider, or forensic laboratory that has in its custody a previously untested sexual assault evidence collection kit used for a forensic medical examination shall comply with the established protocols, rules, and guidelines with respect to all untested kits.For purposes of this subsection, a “previously untested sexual assault evidence collection kit” means any kit that has not undergone forensic testing and was identified and included in the 2017 statewide inventory of kits in law enforcement custody pursuant to Section 17.7 of S.L. 2017-57. To the extent practicable, and consistent with protecting victim confidentiality for unreported sexual assaults, a law enforcement agency having custody of a kit governed by this subsection shall take reasonable measures to provide appropriate tracking information to the affected victim.
  6. Annual Report to the General Assembly. —  Beginning October 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, the Director shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Justice and Public Safety the following information for the previous fiscal year:
    1. The number of tracking-enabled kits shipped to medical facilities or medical providers.
    2. The number of tracking-enabled kits used by medical facilities or medical providers to conduct forensic medical examinations of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault victims.
    3. Of the tracking-enabled kits used by medical facilities or medical providers to conduct forensic medical examinations, the number of kits for which a sexual assault has been reported to law enforcement, sorted by law enforcement agency.
    4. Of the tracking-enabled kits generated for reported cases, the number of kits submitted to a laboratory for forensic testing.
    5. Of the tracking-enabled kits submitted for forensic testing, the number of kits for which forensic testing has been completed.
    6. The number of tracking-enabled kits for which a sexual assault has not been reported, including the total submitted to local law enforcement and the total submitted to Department of Public Safety Law Enforcement Support Services.
    7. Information regarding efforts to track and test previously untested kits described in subsection (e) of this section.

History. 2018-70, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-70, s. 4, made this section effective June 25, 2018.

Subsections (a1) through (e), as enacted by Session Laws 2018-70, s. 1, were redesignated as subsections (b) through (f) and internal references were updated accordingly in the last sentence of subsection (b) and in subdivision (f)(7) at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-70, s. 3, provides: “The Secretary of the Department of Public Safety shall convene a working group to make recommendations regarding the testing priority of untested sexual assault kits identified in the 2017 Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kit Law Enforcement Report made pursuant to Section 17.7 of S.L. 2017-57. The working group shall include representatives from law enforcement, victims’ advocates such as the North Carolina Victim Assistance Network and the North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault, RTI International, the North Carolina Department of Justice, prosecutors, and criminal defense attorneys. The working group shall develop findings and recommendations including a strategic plan to (i) establish the order of priority for testing kits; (ii) test all of the kits that can be tested; (iii) direct the preservation of all kits; (iv) suggest sanctions for the destruction or contamination of kits in violation of G.S. 15A-268 ; and (v) develop statewide protocols to test sexual assault evidence collection kits in the future. The working group statewide protocol for testing future sexual assault evidence collection kits. The working group shall also make findings and recommendations to the Secretary and to the Director with respect to developing the protocols, rules, and guidelines for the System under G.S. 114-65(a). The Secretary shall submit the findings and recommendations of the working group to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Justice and Public Safety by December 1, 2018.”

§§ 114-66 through 114-69.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 10. North Carolina Human Trafficking Commission.

§ 114-70.

G.S. 114-70 was recodified as G.S. 7A-354 by Session Laws 2018-5, s. 18B.7, as added by Session Laws 2018-97, s. 5.6(a), effective July 1, 2018.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-97, s. 5.6(a), provides, in part: “The North Carolina Human Trafficking Commission shall be transferred to the Administrative Office of the Courts as a Type II transfer.”