Chapter 1 Correctional Services [Repealed.]

13-1-1 — 13-1-6. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This chapter (G.L. 1896, ch. 291, §§ 15, 17; G.L. 1909, ch. 360, §§ 17, 20; P.L. 1917, ch. 1470, art. 1, § 3; P.L. 1922, ch. 2230, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 413, art. 1, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 413, art. 5, §§ 4, 7; P.L. 1926, ch. 862, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 55, §§ 4, 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 61, § 1; P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 97; P.L. 1954, ch. 3287, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 55, §§ 1, 2, 10; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, §§ 13-1-1 to 13-1-6; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 3; P.L. 1973, ch. 171, §§ 1, 2) was repealed by P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 3. For present law see chapter 56 of title 42.

Chapter 1.1 Correctional Officers Incentive Pay Plan

13-1.1-1 — 13-1.1-10. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This chapter (P.L. 1975, ch. 279, §§ 1, 2) was repealed by P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 3. For present law see chapter 56.1 of title 42.

Chapter 2 Adult Correctional Institutions

13-2-1 — 13-2-47. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This chapter (G.L. 1896, ch. 231, §§ 6, 10, 11, 13, 14; ch. 289, §§ 5, 6, 13-21; ch. 291, §§ 18-21, 23-28, 30, 33, 34, 39, 40, 41; ch. 295, § 17; P.L. 1898, ch. 337, § 1; P.L. 1899, ch. 681, § 1; P.L. 1901, ch. 865, § 1; C.P.A. 1905, §§ 215, 218, 1148, 1218; P.L. 1906, ch. 1309, § 1; P.L. 1906, ch. 1339, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 282, §§ 30, 33; ch. 322, §§ 5, 6, 9-11, 13-21; ch. 360, §§ 18, 19, 21-24, 26-31, 33, 36, 37, 42-44; ch. 364, § 16; P.L. 1910, ch. 531, § 1; P.L. 1911, ch. 669, § 1; P.L. 1912, ch. 1470, art. 1, §§ 14, 16, art. 3, § 8; P.L. 1922, ch. 1481, § 1, ch. 3230, §§ 8, 9, 18; P.L. 1918, ch. 1649, § 1; P.L. 1919, ch. 1738, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 332, §§ 30, 33, ch. 373, §§ 6, 9-11, 13, 16, ch. 413, art. 1, §§ 14, 16, art. 3, § 5, art. 5, §§ 5, 6, 8-11, 13-18, 20, 23, 24, 29-31, ch. 417, § 16; P.L. 1923, ch. 451, § 1; P.L. 1925, ch. 660, § 1; P.L. 1929, ch. 1382, § 7; P.L. 1930, ch. 1558, § 1, ch. 1591, § 1; P.L. 1932, ch. 1895, § 1; P.L. 1937, ch. 2528, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 55, §§ 5, 6, 8-11, 13-18, 20, 23, 24, 29-31, ch. 61, §§ 2, 7, 8, 15-23, ch. 62, §§ 6, 9-11, 16, ch. 63, §§ 15, 16, ch. 493, §§ 28, 31, ch. 624, § 8, ch. 633, § 17; P.L. 1938, ch. 2642, § 1; P.L. 1944, ch. 1530, § 1; P.L. 1951, ch. 2746, § 1; P.L. 1954, ch. 3294, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 63, § 17, P.L. 1954, ch. 3295, § 1; P.L. 1955, ch. 3549, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 55, §§ 3, 4, 7-45, 55, P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 6; G.L. 1956, §§ 13-2-1 to 13-2-47; P.L. 1960, ch. 112 § 1, ch. 113, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-2-44.1, P.L. 1965, ch. 228, § 1; P.L. 1966, ch. 236, § 1; P.L. 1967, ch. 88, § 1; P.L. 1968, ch. 115, § 1, ch. 119, § 1; P.L. 1969, ch. 239, § 30; P.L. 1970, ch. 15, § 1; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 4; P.L. 1974, ch. 56, § 1, ch. 115, § 1; P.L. 1975, ch. 96, § 1, ch. 135, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 202, § 1) was repealed by P.L. 1964, ch. 14, § 1 and P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 3. For present law see § 42-56-14 et seq.

Chapter 3 Reception and Classification of Male Prisoners

13-3-1 — 13-3-4. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This chapter (G.L. 1938, ch. 55, §§ 5, 6, P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, §§ 13-3-1 to 13-3-4; P.L. 1970, ch. 118, § 1; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 5; P.L. 1973, ch. 172, § 1) was repealed by P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 3. For present law see § 42-56-29 et seq.

Chapter 4 Reform School

13-4-1 — 13-4-18. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This chapter (G.L. 1896, ch. 290, §§ 1-13; G.L. 1896, ch. 231, § 13, P.L. 1906, ch. 1339, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 322, § 13, ch. 359, §§ 1-13; P.L. 1910, ch. 531, § 1; P.L. 1917, ch. 1470, art. 3, § 7, P.L. 1922, ch. 2230, § 18; G.L. 1923, ch. 373, § 13, ch. 412, §§ 1-13, ch. 413, art. 3, § 4; P.L. 1926, ch. 841, § 2; P.L. 1931, ch. 1798, § 3; G. L. 1938, ch. 62, §§ 1-14, 19; P.L. 1946, ch. 1774, §§ 1-3; G.L. 1956, §§ 13-4-1 to 13-4-1 6; P.L. 1963, ch. 173, § 1; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, §§ 6, 7; P.L. 1974, ch. 3, § 1) was repealed by P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 3. For present law see § 42-56-33 et seq.

Chapter 5 Station Houses for Women

13-5-1. Definitions.

In this chapter:

  1. “Police station” includes any place where persons are temporarily confined under arrest; and
  2. “Woman” includes any person of the female sex.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 8; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 8; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-1 .

13-5-2. Designation of station houses.

The city or town council in every city or town in this state, except the council of the city of Pawtucket, shall designate one or more station houses within their respective cities or towns for the detention of all women under arrest. The city or town council may, at any time, so designate any additional station house or houses, and may declare any station house or houses to be no longer so designated; provided, at least one station house shall always remain so designated in each city or town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1910, ch. 626, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-2 .

13-5-3. Appointment, removal, and duties of matrons.

The police chief of every city or town shall appoint at least one woman who shall be known as a police matron. The public safety commission of the city of Providence shall appoint at least two (2) women who shall be known as police matrons. A police matron shall not be appointed for any definite term, but may hold office until removal. She may be removed at any time for cause by the appointing body, by a written order stating the cause of removal. Police matrons shall assist with the confinement of all female prisoners.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-3 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 262, § 1.

13-5-4. Hours of duty of matrons.

  1. The respective hours of service of the police matrons shall be so arranged by the authorities in charge of the police department that:
    1. In the city of Providence, at least one matron shall be on duty at all hours of the day and night; and
    2. In each of the other cities or towns one matron shall be near to and within call of each designated police station at all hours.
  2. Every police matron:
    1. In the city of Providence shall, during her hours of service, remain constantly on duty at the station at which she serves; and
    2. In each of the other cities or towns shall reside at or near the station to which she is attached, and shall hold herself in readiness to answer any call from the station during her hours of service, so long as any woman remains confined at the station.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 3; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-4 .

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection and subdivision designations.

13-5-5. Care of female prisoners by matron.

The police matron shall have, subject only to the general control of the head of the police department, the entire care of all women held under arrest in the station in which she serves or to which she is attached, and may at any time call upon any police officer in the station for assistance.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 4; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 4; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-6 .

Cross References.

Training school for youth, § 42-56-33 et seq.

13-5-6. Accommodations for female prisoners.

In every station in which a police matron serves, or to which a police matron is attached, sufficient and proper accommodations shall be provided for women confined under arrest. In case those accommodations shall be insufficient or improper, the matron shall notify the police chief, and it shall be the duty of the police chief to notify the city or town council. It shall be the duty of the city or town council to provide, at the expense of the city or town, sufficient and proper accommodations.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 5; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-6 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 262, § 1.

13-5-7. Summons of matron on arrest of woman — Removal to designated station house.

Whenever, in any city or town where any police matron shall be appointed under this chapter, a woman is arrested and taken to a police station to which a matron is attached, and where the matron is not then present, it shall be the duty of the officer in charge of the station to cause the matron to be immediately summoned. Whenever, in any city or town in which a police matron has been appointed, a woman is arrested and taken to the station house to which no matron is attached, it shall be the duty of the officer in charge to cause the woman prisoner to be removed, as soon as possible, to the nearest station house to which a police matron is attached.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 6; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 6; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-7 .

13-5-8. Attendance of matrons in court.

At least one police matron in each city or town shall be designated by the chief of police of the city or town to attend before the district and police courts at all times when any woman is to be arraigned before the court, and that matron shall have charge of all women there in attendance awaiting trial or transfer from the court to any other place of detention.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 7; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 7; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-8 .

13-5-9. Salary of matrons.

The salary of the police matrons in each city or town shall be fixed by the city or town council.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 293, § 9; G.L. 1909, ch. 362, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 415, § 9; G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 9; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-9 .

13-5-10. Special statutes saved.

The provisions of this chapter shall be subject to the provisions of any special statutes relating to any particular town or city, none of which is repealed by the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 338, § 10; G.L. 1956, § 13-5-10 .

Chapter 6 Loss of Rights by Prisoners

13-6-1. Life prisoners deemed civilly dead.

Every person imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for life shall, with respect to all rights of property, to the bond of matrimony and to all civil rights and relations of any nature whatsoever, be deemed to be dead in all respects, as if his or her natural death had taken place at the time of conviction. However, the bond of matrimony shall not be dissolved, nor shall the rights to property or other rights of the husband or wife of the imprisoned person be terminated or impaired, except on the entry of a lawfully obtained decree for divorce.

History of Section. G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 59; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 59; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-1 .

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading.

Cross References.

Administration of estate, § 13-6-4 et seq.

Divorce decreed, § 15-5-1 .

Parole, time eligible, § 13-8-13 .

Law Reviews.

James M. Kovach, Comment: Life and Civil Death in the Ocean State: Resurrecting Life-Prisoners’ Right to Access Courts in Rhode Island, 24 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 400 (2019).

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Comparing the language of this section with the terms of § 13-6-3 , the supreme court found that each clearly serves a separate statutory purpose. Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

The civil-death proviso found in this section cannot be triggered until such time as there has been a final judgment of conviction. Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

It was no error to dismiss an inmate’s tort claims; while the court had subject matter jurisdiction, the court did not have authority to proceed, as (1) the inmate was serving a life sentence, (2) the Legislature had unambiguously mandated in R.I. Gen. Laws 13-6-1 that persons serving life sentences were prohibited from asserting civil actions, and (3) the inmate did not fall under any exception to that statute. Gallop v. Adult Corr. Insts., 182 A.3d 1137, 2018 R.I. LEXIS 44 (R.I. 2018).

Issue of whether this section, the civil death statute, was unconstitutional was barred by the “raise-or-waive” rule and procedural law; plaintiff’s opportunity to challenge the civil death statute’s constitutionality before the appellate court was confined to federal civil rights claims, but those claims were not before the trial court and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Gallop v. Adult Corr. Insts., 218 A.3d 543, 2019 R.I. LEXIS 120 (R.I. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 1298, 206 L. Ed. 2d 377, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 1635 (2020).

Divorce.

The permissive portions of § 13-6-3 refer to a prisoner who receives something less than a life sentence. Such an individual cannot be equated with the civilly dead referred to in this section. Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

Inmate’s request to have the record of the inmate’s allegedly invalid marriage sealed was properly denied, and the inmate had no right to appeal that denial, because, as the inmate had been sentenced to life in prison, the inmate had no right to have the record sealed, as the inmate was “civilly dead” under this section, and, for that reason, the inmate had no right to litigate the issue, and the trial court had no authority to entertain any issue except whether the inmate was in fact civilly dead. Zab v. Zab, 203 A.3d 1175, 2019 R.I. LEXIS 41 (R.I. 2019).

Effect of Appeal.

A judgment of conviction is not final so long as the case is pending on appeal. Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

Collateral References.

Life imprisonment, civil effects of sentence to. 139 A.L.R. 1308.

State prisoner’s right to personally appear at civil trial to which he is a party — state court cases. 82 A.L.R.4th 1063.

13-6-2. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This section (G.L. 1896, ch. 285, § 62; C.P.A. 1905, § 1187; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, §§ 60, 62; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 60; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 2; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-2 ), concerning loss of civil rights upon being sentenced to more than a year, was repealed by P.L. 1987, ch. 293, § 5, effective June 30, 1987.

13-6-2.1. Suspension from public office upon conviction — Forfeiture of office upon exhaustion of appeals.

  1. Every person who, while holding elective public office, is convicted of a felony and has exhausted all appeals shall forfeit that public office. The public office shall automatically become vacant by operation of law at the time when the conviction becomes final. The vacancy in office so created shall be filled in accordance with law.
  2. Every person who, while holding elective public office, is convicted of a felony shall be suspended by operation of law from the performance of all official duties until that public official’s legal status is finally determined. While under suspension, that person shall not receive any salary and/or benefit associated with the public office.
  3. If the conviction which prompted the suspension is overturned on appeal, the official shall receive any salary and/or benefit which was withheld.
  4. During the suspension, the duties of the office shall be assumed by the person, if any, who is empowered to assume those duties in the event of the disability of the officeholder.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 418, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading and added the subsection designations.

13-6-2.2. Severability of § 13-6-2.1.

If any of the provisions of § 13-6-2.1 or the application of those provisions to any person or circumstances is held to be invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the section which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the section are declared to be severable.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 418, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading.

13-6-3. Wills or conveyances during imprisonment.

No person who shall be sentenced to imprisonment in the adult correctional institutions shall have any power, during his or her imprisonment, to make a will, or any conveyance of his or her property, or of any part of that property, except by permission of the superior court granted on petition for that power, and on the notice and terms, if any, that the court shall prescribe.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 285, § 53; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 53; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 61; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 61; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 3; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-3 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Comparing the language of § 13-6-1 with the terms of this section, the supreme court found that each clearly serves a separate statutory purpose. Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

The permissive portions of this section refer to a prisoner who receives something less than a life sentence. Such an individual cannot be equated with the civilly dead referred to in § 13-6-1 . Bogosian v. Vaccaro, 422 A.2d 1253, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1873 (R.I. 1980).

Conveyance of Property.

The giving of an appeal bond is not a conveyance of property within the meaning of this section, so that a convict may give a valid appeal bond. Kenyon v. Saunders, 18 R.I. 590 , 30 A. 470, 1894 R.I. LEXIS 76 (1894).

Issue of the invalidity under R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-6-3 of a mortgage from a son to a father signed while the son was incarcerated was moot because the debt secured by the mortgage had been paid and the father had executed a discharge, but even if it had not been moot, a trial court properly applied equitable principles to preclude the son from denying its validity when he testified that the execution of the mortgage was his idea. Opella v. Opella, 896 A.2d 714, 2006 R.I. LEXIS 77 (R.I. 2006).

13-6-4. Application for administration of prisoner’s estate.

Whenever any person shall be imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for life or for a term of seven (7) years or more, any creditor of that person may apply to the probate court of the city or town in which the prisoner last lived and was domiciled in this state, or in which he or she shall have any estate, for letters of administration to be granted on the prisoner’s estate to the prisoner’s next of kin or to any disinterested person, during the imprisonment.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 285, § 54; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 54; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 62; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 62; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 4; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-4 .

Collateral References.

Scope and effect of provisions for appointment of representative for estate of convict. 6 A.L.R. 1459.

13-6-5. Notice and appointment of administrator.

The court may, after giving notice to all interested persons, grant the petition as provided in § 13-6-4 and do all other things required and authorized to be done in the settlement of the estate of a deceased person.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 385, § 55; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 55; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 63; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 63; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-5 .

13-6-6. Powers of administrator.

Every administrator who shall be appointed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall have the same powers, be subject to the same liabilities, and discharge the same duties as an administrator of the estate of a deceased person.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 285, § 57; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 57; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 65; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 65; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-6 .

13-6-7. Bond to secure estate to prisoner — Life prisoners.

The bond given by the administrator appointed pursuant to § 13-6-5 shall secure to the prisoner, after he or she shall be discharged from the adult correctional institutions, whatever shall remain of his or her estate after payment of his or her debts, the expenses of settling his or her estate, and any sums that the probate court may, from time to time, direct or allow for the support of his or her family. In case of imprisonment for life, the estate of the prisoner shall be divided among his or her heirs at law and distributed in the same way as though he or she were dead.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 285, § 56; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 56; G.L. 1909, ch. 354, § 64; P.L. 1915, ch. 1261, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 407, § 64; G.L. 1938, ch. 624, § 6; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-6-7 .

Chapter 7 Prisoner Made Goods

13-7-1. Short title and purpose of chapter.

This chapter shall be known as “An Act to Promote the State Use System of Industries in the Public Welfare Institutions”, and shall be interpreted to encourage the production of goods and merchandise in the public welfare institutions of this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-1 .

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading.

Law Reviews.

Jacqueline G. Kelley, Rehabilitate, Don’t Recidivate: A Reframing of the Ban the Box Debate, 22 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 590 (2017).

13-7-2. “Public welfare institutions” defined.

“Public welfare institutions” as used in this chapter means the adult correctional institutions.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 2; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-2 .

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading.

13-7-3. Vocational training opportunities — Production of goods or services.

  1. The director of the department of corrections may establish within any of the institutions under his or her control vocational training programs, and programs for the actual manufacture, assembly, repair, fabrication, servicing, and production of commercially saleable commodities and services.
  2. The director or his or her designee may permit private persons, firms, or corporations, to establish and maintain the training and production activities within any of the institutions under his or her management and control, upon any terms and conditions that the director shall approve.
  3. In respect to the actual production of goods or services, as distinct from training programs, the director or his or her designee shall cause the inmates who participate in those programs to be paid by any private person, firm, or corporation, the minimum wage then and there prevailing in this state, and shall attempt, so far as may be feasible and practicable, to cause the inmates to be paid the prevailing wage for similar types of work currently obtained within the state.
  4. The director or his or her designee is authorized, if he or she deems it necessary, to waive workers’ compensation coverage, temporary disability insurance coverage, and other types of fringe benefits in respect to inmates who participate in these programs.
  5. No inmate shall be required to participate in any program without his or her consent.

History of Section. P.L. 1975, ch. 95, § 2; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 4.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading and added the subsection designations.

13-7-4. Imported goods.

The provisions of this chapter, and all other regulations and laws of this state not inconsistent with this chapter, shall apply to all goods, wares, and merchandise manufactured or mined, wholly or in part, by convicts or prisoners (except prisoners on parole or probation), or manufactured or mined in any penal or reformatory institution, and transported into the state for use or distribution, to the same extent and in the same manner as if those goods and merchandise were manufactured, produced, or mined within this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-4 .

13-7-5. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This section (P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-5 ), concerning contracts by public agencies for labor by prisoners, was repealed by P.L. 1994, ch. 70, art. 24, § 3, effective July 1, 1994.

13-7-6. Sale of goods and performance of services — Public agencies.

For the purpose of this chapter, the provisions of § 13-7-3 shall not include:

  1. The sale or exchange of convict-made goods produced in the public welfare institutions of this state, to or with other reformatory or custodial institutions, for their own consumption or use;
  2. The sale of goods, wares, and merchandise to any department, institution, or agency of any state or its political subdivisions; nor
  3. The performing of laundry services for other state institutions and agencies.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-6 ; P.L. 1961, ch. 77, § 1; P.L. 1994, ch. 70, art. 24, § 4.

13-7-7. Notice to public purchasing agents of articles being produced.

  1. The department of corrections shall cause any articles and materials that are used in the offices, departments, or institutions of the state and of the several cities and towns to be produced by the labor of inmates in the public welfare institutions.
  2. From time to time the department of corrections shall notify the state purchasing agent, and the managing officer of any office, department, or institution having the duty of purchasing articles and materials for any city or town, what articles and materials are being produced in the public welfare institutions. This notification shall describe the articles and materials in detail, giving the style, size, design, or quality and any other information necessary to properly describe the articles and materials.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 6; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 80; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-7 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 8.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

13-7-8. Requisition of goods by public agencies.

When the state purchasing agent or agent of any state office, department, or institution has occasion to purchase any articles, services or materials similar to those produced in the adult correctional institutions, and notification of that production has been given to him or her pursuant to § 13-7-7 , he or she shall make requisition for the articles, services or materials to the director of corrections, the provisions of any statute, resolution, rule, or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding. The requisition shall conform to specifications and descriptions previously submitted by the director unless it appears that special style, design, or quality is needed. The requisition shall be on forms provided by the director. If the articles or materials are needed immediately and are not on hand, or the articles, services, or materials can be purchased at a price less than the quote received by the requisitioner from the adult correctional institutions, the director shall immediately notify the requisitioner and he or she may purchase the articles, services or materials elsewhere.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 7; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 80; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-8 ; P.L. 1995, ch. 295, § 1.

13-7-8.1. Requisition of goods by cities and towns.

When the purchasing agent or the managing officer of any city or town office, department, or institution, has occasion to purchase any articles, services or materials similar to those produced at the adult correctional institutions, he or she shall notify the director of corrections of the intention to purchase and shall allow the adult correctional institutions to bid on any proposal. The adult correctional institutions shall be placed on any invitation to bid list which is in effect for any city or town. Purchases under this section shall include those defined in § 37-2-22 .

History of Section. P.L. 1995, ch. 295, § 2.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment substituted “director of corrections” for “director of the adult correctional institution” in the first sentence.

13-7-9. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This section (P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 8; P.L. 1990, ch. 398, § 1), requiring a certificate of unavailability of prison-made goods to accompany public purchases, was repealed by P.L. 1995, ch. 295, § 3, effective July 5, 1995.

13-7-10. Price of goods.

The price of all articles and materials supplied by the public welfare institutions shall conform as nearly as practicable to the wholesale market rates for similar goods manufactured elsewhere. Any difference of opinion in regard to price shall be submitted for arbitration to a representative of the department of corrections, a representative of the requisitioner, and the director of administration, and the decision of a majority of them shall be final.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 9; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 9; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2727, art. 1, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-10 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 8.

Cross References.

Exemption from sales and use taxes, § 44-18-30(8) .

Payment for purchases from general store at state institutions, §§ 35-5-8 , 35-5-9 .

13-7-11. Standards and purchase agreements.

The director of corrections or his or her designee shall, from time to time, meet with the state purchasing agent to develop standards for commodities manufactured and produced by penal industries, and to prepare and secure compacts or agreements for the purchase of commodities from the penal institutions, so as to aid the service afforded by the institutions under the department of corrections.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 11; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 10; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 80; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2724, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-11 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 8; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 4.

13-7-12. Production standards — Determination of articles to be produced.

The director of corrections or his or her designee shall establish certain standards of production, and shall by consultation and meeting with the state purchasing agent and the managing officers and purchasing agents of municipal offices, departments, and institutions determine the style, design, and quality of articles and materials to be made.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 11; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 80; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2724, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-12 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 8; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 4.

13-7-13. Manufacture on special order.

If articles or materials of a different design, style, or quality than those produced are needed by any state department or institution, the director of corrections may, if a sufficient quantity is needed, arrange for their manufacture of them on special order.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 13; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 12; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 80; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-13 .

13-7-14. Penalty for violations.

Any officer who willfully neglects or refuses to comply with the provisions of this chapter relative to the purchase of articles and materials from the public welfare institutions shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100) for each violation.

History of Section. P.L. 1934, ch. 2106, § 14; G.L. 1938, ch. 64, § 13; G.L. 1956, § 13-7-14 .

13-7-15. Business operations and budget.

Correctional industries shall maintain an accurate and timely accounting of monies received from the sale of products or services of committed offenders. Monies accredited into the correctional industries fund shall be used for the purchase of materials, supervision, and other requirements necessary to support the production of goods and services. All expenditures from the correctional industry fund shall be subject to the approval of the director of corrections or his or her designee, who may employ those funds to defray all operating expenses. All net profits for the fiscal year shall be reinvested into the correctional industries fund to support capital purchases, and the general expansion and development of correctional industries. All additional profits will revert to the general treasury.

History of Section. P.L. 1982, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1983, ch. 167, art. XXIII, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 10, § 1.

Chapter 8 Parole

13-8-1. Parole board — Appointment and terms of members.

Within the department of corrections there shall be a parole board consisting of seven (7) qualified electors of the state appointed by the governor. In the month of January in each year, the governor shall appoint one or more members of the board to serve in place of members whose terms have expired, for a term of three (3) years, and until his, her, or their successors have been appointed and qualified.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 1; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 1; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; P.L. 1935, ch. 2250, § 17; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 1; P.L. 1943, ch. 1304, § 1; P. L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 1; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-1 ; P.L. 1969, ch. 28, § 1; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1993, ch. 262, § 1.

Cross References.

Probation, §§ 12-18-1 , 12-18-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Failure of the governor to make an appointment under this section in the month of January does not preclude his making it later. Little v. Iannuccillo, 100 R.I. 336 , 215 A.2d 421, 1965 R.I. LEXIS 401 (1965).

13-8-2. Qualifications of board members.

The seven (7) electors to be named by the governor shall have the following qualifications:

    1. One of the qualified electors shall be a psychologist or a physician who is professionally qualified in the field of psychiatry or neurology;
    2. One shall be a member in good standing of the Rhode Island bar;
    3. One shall be a person who is professionally trained in correctional work or in some closely related general field as a social work; and
    4. One shall be a law enforcement officer;
  1. All of the qualified electors shall be individuals who shall also have shown an interest in social welfare problems.

History of Section. G.L., ch. 617, § 1; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-2 ; P.L. 1969, ch. 28, § 2; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1993, ch. 262, § 2; P.L. 2012, ch. 421, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 481, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the paragraph designations in subdivision (1).

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2012, ch. 421, § 1, and P.L. 2012, ch. 481, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

13-8-3. Chairperson of board — Liberty permits.

  1. The governor shall appoint a qualified elector of this state chairperson of the parole board, who shall serve in the unclassified service as a fulltime employee for a term of two (2) years and until his or her successor has been appointed and qualified.
  2. All remaining members of the board shall also be in the unclassified service.
  3. The chairperson shall be an individual who has experience in the criminal justice system and shall have earned a baccalaureate degree.
  4. The chairperson shall have authority to create subcommittees of at least three (3) members of the parole board who shall serve on a rotating basis. The subcommittee may, in the case of any prisoner who is subject to the control of the parole board, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the subcommittee members, unless the prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for life and unless the prisoner is confined as a habitual criminal under the provisions of § 12-19-21 , issue to the prisoner a permit to be at liberty upon parole as if the permit were issued by the full board pursuant to the provisions of § 13-8-9 .

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 1; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 1; P.L. 1943, ch. 1304, § 1; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 1; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-3 ; P.L. 1978, ch. 96, § 1; P.L. 1993, ch. 262, § 3.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

13-8-3.1. Subpoena powers of board.

  1. Upon a specific demand made by either party to a preliminary or final parole revocation, the parole board is authorized and empowered to summon witnesses and to compel the production and examination of papers, books, accounts, documents, records, certificates and other legal evidence that may be necessary or proper for the determination and decision of any question before the board at the hearing.
  2. Both parties to a preliminary or final parole revocation hearing shall be informed of the right to compulsory process sufficiently in advance of the hearing to allow the parole board to effectuate that right in accordance with this section.
  3. Nothing in this statute shall be deemed to modify or supercede existing or common law privilege, including the confidential informant privilege.
  4. All subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum shall be signed by the chairperson or, in the absence or disqualification of the chairperson, by any other member of the parole board, and shall be served as subpoenas are now served in civil cases in the superior court; and witnesses so subpoenaed shall be entitled to the same fees for attendance and travel as are now provided for witnesses in civil cases in the superior court.
  5. If any person fails to obey the command of any subpoena without reasonable cause, or if a person in attendance before the board shall, without reasonable cause, refuse to be sworn or examined, or to answer a legal and pertinent question, the board may apply to any justice of the superior court, upon proof by affidavit of the fact, for a rule or order returnable in not less than two (2) or more than five (5) days, directing the person to show cause why he or she should not be adjudged in contempt. Upon the return of the order, the justice before whom the matter is brought for a hearing shall examine the person under oath and the person shall be given an opportunity to be heard. If the justice shall determine that the person has refused without reasonable cause or legal excuse to be examined, or to answer a legal and pertinent question, or to produce books, accounts, papers, records and documents material to the issue, which he or she was ordered to bring or produce, the justice may immediately commit the person to the adult correctional institutions, thereto remain until he or she submits to do the act which he or she was so required to do, or is discharged according to law. If an application of contempt pursuant to this section relates to the actions of a witness at a public hearing, then the papers filed with and proceedings before the court shall be open to the public; otherwise, these papers and proceedings shall be confidential.

History of Section. P.L. 2000, ch. 367, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

13-8-4. Facilities and supplies for board.

The director of corrections shall provide adequate quarters for the board for the purpose of holding meetings and shall provide space and facilities for the keeping of records for the board, together with the necessary equipment and supplies incident to the maintenance of the board.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 11; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-4 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9.

13-8-5. Staffing of parole board.

The director of corrections shall provide the board with an administrator, an investigator, a clerk, a psychologist(s), whose sole function within the department of corrections shall be to consult with the board, and the necessary stenographic service. Staff salaries shall be paid from the appropriation of the department of corrections.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 12; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-5 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 118, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 140, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2009, ch. 118, § 1, and P.L. 2009, ch. 140, § 1, enacted identical amendments to this section.

13-8-6. Duties of administrator — Case folders.

  1. The duties of the administrator shall include the following:
    1. To administer the office of the parole board;
    2. To supervise the collection of data for each applicant for parole;
    3. To summarize collected data and prepare a folder on each applicant for parole, including the summary of the information collected from the above sources, or any other sources which are deemed appropriate, together with the original supporting documents, and all communications addressed to the board and its members concerning the applicant for parole;
    4. To maintain, in the folder of each applicant, the report of the board provided for in § 13-8-23 ;
    5. To arrange for each meeting of the board;
    6. To prepare all reports required of the board;
      1. To send to the state and local police a list of all persons, including their date of birth and last known address prior to incarceration, lead offenses, and the name of the police department which prosecuted the person, whose application for parole is to be considered by the board, not less than six (6) weeks prior to the meeting to consider the applications, so that the state police and the local police departments may return any comment deemed appropriate at least two (2) weeks prior to the scheduled meeting; and to make a reasonable effort to notify the victim of the crime committed by the prisoner, or, in homicide cases, the victim’s next of kin, and/or, in cases where the victim is a minor, the victim’s parent and/or legal guardian, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the meeting, of his or her right to provide a victim impact statement to the board;
      2. For the purposes of this subdivision the following words and phrases have the following meanings:
        1. “Victim” means an individual who has suffered direct or threatened physical, emotional, or financial harm as the result of the commission of a crime, or an immediate family member of a minor or a homicide victim.
        2. “Victim impact statement” means a statement providing information about the financial, emotional, and physical effects of a crime on the victim and the victim’s family, and specific information about the victim, the circumstances surrounding the crime, and the manner in which it was perpetrated.
    7. To furnish the attorney general, the state police, and the local police departments set forth in § 13-8-9.1 with a photograph (or a reasonable facsimile) of each prisoner released, taken at the time of his or her release on parole;
    8. To notify the police department of the town or city in which the prisoner resided before sentence and the police department of the city or town in which he or she is to reside, at least five (5) days prior to the release of any prisoner on parole, of the release;
    9. To have published in a newspaper of general circulation, once a month, the names of the persons whose applications for parole are to be considered within the upcoming month and the hearing date or dates of the applications;
    10. To prepare a list of all individuals released by the board;
    11. To maintain that list in the permanent files of the office of the board, which list shall be a public record;
    12. To confer with the director of corrections on all matters relating to the activities of the board; and
    13. To perform related duties as required.
  2. Case folders shall be made available to each member of the board not less than a week prior to its meeting to interview applicants for parole and shall be maintained in the permanent files of the board.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 12; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-6 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9; P.L. 1983, ch. 215, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1999, ch. 472, § 1; P.L. 2002, ch. 319, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 118, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 140, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the paragraph designations in subdivision (a)(7).

Compiler’s Notes.

The section as it appears above has been edited by the compiler to include the changes made by the 2002 Reenactment of this title which were not included in the 2002 amendment.

P.L. 2009, ch. 118, § 1, and P.L. 2009, ch. 140, § 1, enacted identical amendments to this section.

Collateral References.

Propriety, in criminal case, of Federal District Court order restricting defendant’s right to re-enter or stay in United States. 94 A.L.R. Fed. 619.

13-8-6.1. Notice to local police departments and to state police.

The parole board shall provide notice to the state and local police departments upon the release of a prisoner on parole, as provided in §§ 13-8-6 and 13-8-16 .

History of Section. P.L. 1983, ch. 215, § 2; P.L. 2002, ch. 319, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

The section as it appears above has been edited by the compiler to include the changes made by the 2002 Reenactment of this title which were not included in the 2002 amendment.

13-8-7. Expenses of board.

The members of the parole board shall be entitled to receive the traveling expenses necessarily incurred in the performance by them of any duty under this chapter. The general assembly shall annually appropriate any sum that it may deem necessary to defray the expenses of the board, including the traveling expenses of its members. The state controller is authorized and directed to draw his or her order or orders upon the general treasurer for the payment of those expenses upon receipt by him or her of proper vouchers duly authenticated and approved by the chairperson.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, §§ 10, 11; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, §§ 10, 11; P.L. 1935, ch. 2250, § 149; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, §§ 10, 11; P.L. 1943, ch. 1304, § 1; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 14; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-7 .

13-8-8. Sentences subject to control of board.

Whenever a person convicted of any offense shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the adult correctional institutions for a period of more than six (6) months, his or her sentence shall be subject to the control of the parole board as provided for in this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 2; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1950, ch. 2466, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-8 .

Collateral References.

Are sentences on different counts to be regarded as for a single term or for separate terms as regards pardon, parole, probation or commutation of sentence. 107 A.L.R. 634.

Parole of prisoners, or discharge of parolees, statute conferring power upon administrative body in respect to, as unconstitutional infringement of power of executive. 143 A.L.R. 1488.

Persons or entities entitled to restitution as “victim” under state criminal restitution statute. 92 A.L.R.5th 35.

Revocation of order commuting state criminal sentence. 88 A.L.R.5th 463.

13-8-9. Issuance of parole.

  1. The parole board, in the case of any prisoner whose sentence is subject to its control, unless that prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for life, and unless that prisoner is confined as a habitual criminal under the provisions of § 12-19-21 , may, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the board, issue to that prisoner a permit to be at liberty upon parole, whenever that prisoner has served not less than one-third (1/3) of the term for which he or she was sentenced. The permit shall entitle the prisoner to whom it is issued to be at liberty during the remainder of his or her term of sentence upon any terms and conditions that the board may prescribe.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, in the case of a conviction for a first- or second-degree murder committed after July 1, 2015, when the prisoner has not been sentenced to life, the prisoner shall not be eligible for a parole permit until he or she has served at least fifty-percent (50%) of his or her sentence.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 3; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 2; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 3; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 2; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-9 ; P.L. 2015, ch. 284, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 285, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2015, ch. 284, § 1, and P.L. 2015, ch. 285, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

The parole board is not required to parole a prisoner when he becomes eligible or even to receive a petition or grant a hearing thereon. Lee v. Kindelan, 80 R.I. 212 , 95 A.2d 51, 1953 R.I. LEXIS 54 , cert. denied, 345 U.S. 1000, 73 S. Ct. 1146, 97 L. Ed. 1406, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1975 (1953).

For an advisory opinion as to when an individual sentenced to consecutive life sentences may apply for parole, see In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 421 A.2d 535, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1841 (R.I. 1980).

Conditions.

R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-9 explicitly authorizes the parole board to issue parole permits to qualified prisoners upon any terms and conditions that the board may prescribe. Curtis v. State, 996 A.2d 601, 2010 R.I. LEXIS 70 (R.I. 2010).

Electronic Monitoring Program.

Defendant was at liberty on parole under R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 13-8-16(a) and 13-8-9 , even with a condition that defendant cooperate with an electronic monitoring program, to which defendant assented, and under R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-19(b) , defendant could not receive credit for time spent on community confinement after violating defendant’s parole. Curtis v. State, 996 A.2d 601, 2010 R.I. LEXIS 70 (R.I. 2010).

Collateral References.

Fine or penalty imposed in addition to imprisonment, pardon or parole as affecting. 74 A.L.R. 1118.

Parole as suspending running of sentence. 28 A.L.R. 947.

13-8-9.1. Notification upon release.

The parole board shall, immediately prior to the release of any prisoner on parole, notify:

  1. The victim of the crime committed by the prisoner, or in homicide cases a member of the immediate family of the victim if any can be identified; and
  2. The police department in the community where the crime for which the prisoner was sentenced was committed, the police department in the community where the prisoner was residing at the time of the commission of the offense, and the police department in the community where the prisoner will be residing upon his or her release.

History of Section. P.L. 1983, ch. 259, § 1; P.L. 1984, ch. 14, § 1.

13-8-10. Prisoners subject to more than one sentence.

  1. If a prisoner is confined upon more than one sentence, a parole permit may be issued whenever he or she has served a term equal to one-third (1/3) of the aggregate time which he or she shall be liable to serve under his or her several sentences, unless he or she has been sentenced to serve two (2) or more terms concurrently, in which case the permit shall be issued when he or she has served a term equal to one-third (1/3) of the maximum term he or she is required to serve.
  2. If a prisoner, whether in confinement or on parole, is sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment for an offense which was committed after imposition of the sentence then being served, a permit may not be issued until he or she has served in confinement at least one-third (1/3) of the term of imprisonment to which he or she is sentenced for the subsequent offense. In calculating the date the prisoner shall become eligible for a permit, the time spent in confinement on an earlier imposed concurrent sentence shall not be credited for the purposes of parole eligibility on the subsequent sentence. In the event a prisoner is convicted of two (2) or more subsequent offenses and is sentenced to multiple terms of imprisonment for those offenses, the standards contained in subsection (a) of this section shall be used to determine when he or she has served one-third (1/3) of the terms of confinement imposed for the subsequent offenses and thereby is eligible for issuance of a permit under this subsection.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 3; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 2; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 3; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 2; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-10 ; P.L. 1979, ch. 394, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

A parole board’s action in first giving a convict eligibility status for parole and then subsequently taking it away based on its reinterpretation of the parole eligibility statutes did not violate due process. Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352, 1983 R.I. LEXIS 1052 (R.I. 1983).

A parole-board determination in regard to a convict’s parole-eligibility status was not the equivalent of a rule subject to the ex post facto clauses of the Rhode Island and United States Constitutions. Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352, 1983 R.I. LEXIS 1052 (R.I. 1983).

Where the statute on parole eligibility had not been changed, procedural guidelines adopted and applied by the parole board after sentencing of a petitioner were not in violation of the prohibition against ex post facto laws. Skawinski v. State, 538 A.2d 1006, 1988 R.I. LEXIS 24 (R.I. 1988).

In General.

For an advisory opinion as to when an individual sentenced to consecutive life sentences may apply for parole, see In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 421 A.2d 535, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1841 (R.I. 1980).

Eligibility for Parole.

The clause in subsection (a) relating to concurrent sentences cannot be read in isolation from the preceding clause. DeCiantis v. State, 666 A.2d 410, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 245 (R.I. 1995).

The trial court properly applied § 13-8-13 to require that the defendant serve ten years of concurrent life sentences and an additional ten years on a consecutive life sentence before becoming eligible for parole. DeCiantis v. State, 666 A.2d 410, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 245 (R.I. 1995).

Inmate’s claim that the inmate was unlawfully incarcerated failed because the inmate’s interpretation of R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-10(a) to require the inmate’s parole after serving one-third of the inmate’s maximum sentence ignored the discretion of the parole board. Brown v. State, 32 A.3d 901, 2011 R.I. LEXIS 142 (R.I. 2011).

Collateral References.

Validity, construction, and application of concurrent-sentence doctrine-state cases. 56 A.L.R.5th 385.

13-8-11. Good conduct, industrial, and meritorious service time.

  1. In computing the one-third (1/3) of any term of sentence for the purpose of §§ 13-8-9 13-8-14 , the time a prisoner shall have earned pursuant to §§ 42-56-24 and 42-56-26 shall be considered by the parole board to reduce inmate overcrowding when directed by the criminal justice oversight committee, pursuant to the provisions of § 42-26-13.3(e) , or when directed by the governor pursuant to the provisions of § 42-26-13.3(f) .
  2. As used in this section, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meanings:
    1. “Compliance,” the absence of a finding by a parole officer or the parole board of a violation of the terms or conditions of a permit or conditions of parole supervision set by the Rhode Island parole board.
    2. “Compliance credits,” credits that an eligible offender earns through compliance with parole board-ordered conditions of parole supervision; provided, however, that the credits shall operate to reduce the length of parole supervision.
    3. “Eligible parolee,” any offender who is currently serving a term of post-incarceration parole supervision except any such person serving a sentence of a violation of § 11-5-1 (where the specified felony is murder or sexual assault), § 11-23-1 , § 11-26-1.4 , § 11-37-2 , § 11-37-8.1 , or § 11-37-8.3 .
  3. On the first day of each calendar month after July 1, 2021, an eligible parolee shall earn five (5) days of compliance credits if the eligible parolee served on parole without any documented behavior that could constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of parole for the prior calendar month. Any compliance credits so granted and not rescinded pursuant to guidelines set forth by the parole board shall reduce the period of time that a parolee is subject to the jurisdiction of the parole board under § 13-8-9 .
  4. The parole board shall issue guidelines governing the awarding of compliance credits; any disqualifiers to the earning of compliance credits; and the rescission or suspension of compliance credits as applicable.
  5. The award or rescission of credits pursuant to this section shall not be the subject of judicial review.
  6. This section shall apply to all individuals sentenced to imprisonment and subsequently granted parole including those sentences granted prior to passage of this legislation and shall not alter the ability of the parole board to revoke parole. The calculation of compliance credits shall be prospective from the date of passage, while eligibility to earn compliance credits shall be prospective and retrospective.
  7. The department of corrections shall keep a record of the eligible parolee’s sentence, including the person’s end of supervision date based on earned credits for compliance with the terms and conditions of parole.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 3; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 2; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 3; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 2; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-11 ; P.L. 1965, ch. 228, § 2; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1993, ch. 108, § 2; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 3, effective July 6, 2021.

13-8-12. Repealed.

Repealed Sections.

This section (P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 3; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 2; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-12 ), concerning parole eligibility of habitual criminals, was repealed by P.L. 1982, ch. 226, § 3. For current provisions concerning minimum sentences habitual criminals must serve to be eligible for parole, see § 12-19-21(b) .

13-8-13. Life prisoners and prisoners with lengthy sentences.

  1. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life, a parole permit may be issued at any time after the prisoner has served not less than ten (10) years’ imprisonment; provided that:
    1. In the case of a prisoner serving a sentence or sentences of a length making him or her ineligible for a permit in less than ten (10) years, pursuant to §§ 13-8-9 and 13-8-10 , the permit may be issued at any time after the prisoner has served not less than ten (10) years’ imprisonment;
    2. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life for a first- or second-degree murder committed after July 10, 1989, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than fifteen (15) years’ imprisonment;
    3. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life for a first- or second-degree murder committed after June 30, 1995, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty (20) years’ imprisonment;
    4. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life for a first- or second-degree murder committed after July 1, 2015, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty-five (25) years’ imprisonment; and
    5. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life for a crime, other than first- or second-degree murder, committed after July 1, 2015, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty (20) years’ imprisonment.
  2. The permit shall be issued only by a unanimous vote of all the attending members of the board; provided that not less than four (4) members are present, and whenever, after the issue of the permit, the prisoner shall be pardoned, then the control of the board over the prisoner shall cease and terminate.
    1. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life who is convicted of escape or attempted escape from the lawful custody of the warden of the adult correctional institutions, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty-five (25) years’ imprisonment; provided, however, that as to a prisoner who has been sentenced to imprisonment for life for a conviction of first- or second-degree murder, committed after July 1, 2015, and who is convicted thereafter of escape or attempted escape from the lawful custody of the warden of the adult correctional institutions, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than thirty-five (35) years’ imprisonment; and
    2. For each subsequent conviction of escape or attempted escape, an additional five (5) years shall be added to the time required to be served.
  3. In the case of a prisoner sentenced consecutively to more than one life term for crimes occurring after May 7, 1981, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than ten (10) years consecutively on each life sentence; provided, in the case of a prisoner sentenced consecutively to more than one life term for crimes occurring after June 30, 1995, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than fifteen (15) years consecutively on each life sentence. In the case of a prisoner sentenced consecutively to more than one life term for crimes occurring after July 1, 2015, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty (20) years consecutively on each life sentence. In the case of a prisoner sentenced consecutively to more than one life term for crimes, including first- or second-degree murder, occurring after July 1, 2015, the permit may be issued only after the prisoner has served not less than twenty-five (25) years consecutively on each life sentence.
  4. Any person sentenced for any offense committed prior to his or her twenty-second birthday, other than a person serving life without parole, shall be eligible for parole review and a parole permit may be issued after the person has served no fewer than twenty (20) years’ imprisonment unless the person is entitled to earlier parole eligibility pursuant to any other provisions of law. This subsection shall be given prospective and retroactive effect for all offenses occurring on or after January 1, 1991.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 3; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 3; P.L. 1926, ch. 868, § 2; P.L. 1932, ch. 1933, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-13 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 115, § 1; P.L. 1970, ch. 120, § 1; P.L. 1975, ch. 190, § 1; P.L. 1981, ch. 36, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1995, ch. 129, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 284, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 285, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 3, effective July 6, 2021.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment in subsection (a) added the subdivision designations, and added paragraph designations in subdivisions (3) and (4).

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2015, ch. 284, § 1, and P.L. 2015, ch. 285, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Law Reviews.

Mackenzie McBurney, Comment: Paying the Price: Eliminating Life Without Parole Sentences for Juveniles in Rhode Island, 23 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 553 (2018).

James M. Kovach, Comment: Life and Civil Death in the Ocean State: Resurrecting Life-Prisoners’ Right to Access Courts in Rhode Island, 24 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 400 (2019).

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

A parole board’s action in first giving a convict eligibility status for parole and then subsequently taking it away based on its reinterpretation of the parole eligibility statutes did not violate due process. Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352 (R.I. 1983). But see Lerner v. Gill, 580 F. Supp. 1056 (D.R.I. 1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1010, 105 S. Ct. 2709, 86 L. Ed. 2d 724 (1985), annotated below.

A parole-board determination in regard to a convict’s parole-eligibility status was not the equivalent of a rule subject to ex post facto clauses of the Rhode Island and United States Constitutions. Lerner v. Gill, 463 A.2d 1352, 1983 R.I. LEXIS 1052 (R.I. 1983).

Where a prisoner is informed by the parole board and believes that he is parole eligible, and this action of the parole board is based upon a rational if not correct application of the statute in an area of the board’s particular expertise, i.e., this section, a revocation of that status, both rationally and on the basis of authority, is an unlawful ex post facto exposition, and the prisoner should be considered to be eligible for consideration for a parole permit. Lerner v. Gill, 580 F. Supp. 1056, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20448 (D.R.I. 1984), rev'd, 751 F.2d 450, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27510 (1st Cir. 1985).

The state supreme court’s construction of this section, as amended in 1970, that a prisoner who had been sentenced to two consecutive life sentences had to serve ten years for each sentence, consecutively, for a total of 20 years, before becoming eligible for parole, was not so unforeseeable, and the defendant’s reliance on a prior attorney general’s interpretation, that the defendant was eligible for parole after serving ten years, was not so prejudicial, as to amount to a denial of due process. Lerner v. Gill, 751 F.2d 450, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27510 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1010, 105 S. Ct. 2709, 86 L. Ed. 2d 724, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 2229 (1985) (decided under facts existing prior to 1981 amendment).

In General.

Where a little more than three months between the day of the denial of a new trial motion and the imposition of sentence elapses, this period is not considered unreasonable for purposes of considering when accused’s imprisonment time would begin to run. State v. Winston, 105 R.I. 447 , 252 A.2d 354, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 774 (1969).

For an advisory opinion as to when an individual sentenced to consecutive life sentences may apply for parole, see In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 421 A.2d 535, 1980 R.I. LEXIS 1841 (R.I. 1980).

Eligibility for Parole.

The trial court properly applied subsection (b) of this section to require that the defendant serve ten years of concurrent life sentences and an additional ten years on a consecutive life sentence before becoming eligible for parole. DeCiantis v. State, 666 A.2d 410, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 245 (R.I. 1995).

13-8-14. Release criteria.

  1. A permit shall not be issued to any prisoner under the authority of §§ 13-8-9 -13-8-13 unless it shall appear to the parole board:
    1. That the prisoner has substantially observed the rules of the institution in which confined, as evidenced by reports submitted to the board by the director of the department of corrections, or his or her designated representatives, in a form to be prescribed by the director;
    2. That release would not depreciate the seriousness of the prisoner’s offense or promote disrespect for the law;
    3. That there is a reasonable probability that the prisoner, if released, would live and remain at liberty without violating the law;
    4. That the prisoner can properly assume a role in the city or town in which he or she is to reside. In assessing the prisoner’s role in the community the board shall consider:
      1. Whether or not the prisoner has employment;
      2. The location of his or her residence and place of employment; and
      3. The needs of the prisoner for special services, including but not limited to, specialized medical care and rehabilitative services; and
    5. That any and all restitution imposed pursuant to § 12-19-32 has been paid in full, or satisfactory arrangements have been made with the court if the person has the ability to pay. Any agreement shall be in writing and it is the burden of the person seeking parole to satisfy the parole board that this requirement has been met. Any person subject to the provisions of this section may request an ability to pay hearing, by filing the request with the court which imposed the original sentence.
  2. In the case of a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life who is released on parole and who is subsequently convicted of a crime of violence as defined in § 11-47-2 , the conviction shall constitute an automatic revocation of parole and the prisoner shall not be eligible for parole thereafter.
  3. In the case of a prisoner convicted of a crime of violence as defined in § 11-47-2 and subsequently released on parole, should the prisoner, while on parole, commit an offense which results in a sentence of imprisonment for life, the conviction shall constitute an automatic revocation of parole and the prisoner shall not thereafter be eligible for parole.

History of Section. P.L. 1976, ch. 223, § 2; P.L. 1980, ch. 292, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 1995, ch. 94, § 2.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Denial of Parole.

Minimal due process requires that any parole denial be accompanied by a written statement from the parole board, containing the grounds for the decision and the underlying factors supporting those grounds, sufficient to enable a reviewing court to determine whether parole was denied for permissible reasons. State v. Ouimette, 117 R.I. 361 , 367 A.2d 704, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1638 (1976); State v. Tillinghast, 609 A.2d 217, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 137 (R.I. 1992).

Where there was nothing in the record to indicate that the parole board deviated from its clearly established guidelines when it denied a request for parole, there was no violation of due process. Estrada v. Walker, 743 A.2d 1026, 1999 R.I. LEXIS 230 (R.I. 1999).

Revocation of Parole.

Inmate’s parole revocation violated due process, because (1) at a first final parole hearing, the inmate was not heard in person or by appointed counsel, and (2) it was error to deny requested counsel at a second final hearing, as the issues were complex and the potential result of life in prison without parole was severe. Jefferson v. State, 184 A.3d 1094, 2018 R.I. LEXIS 73 (R.I. 2018).

13-8-14.1. Parole standards.

  1. At least once each calendar year the parole board shall adopt standards to be utilized by the board in evaluating applications for parole of persons convicted of a criminal offense and sentenced to the adult correctional institutions. These standards shall establish, with the range of parole eligibility set by statute, the portion of a sentence which should be served depending on the likelihood of recidivism as determined by a risk assessment, and shall serve as guidelines for the board in making individual parole determinations.
  2. The board shall consider the applicable standard prior to rendering a decision on a parole application, and may make a determination at variance with that standard only upon a finding that the determination is warranted by individualized factors, such as the character, criminal history, and attitudes of the applicant that bear on the likelihood to reoffend, the conduct of the applicant while incarcerated, including meaningful participation in a risk-reducing program and substantial compliance with the rules of the institution, and risk-reducing behavior and the criteria set forth in § 13-8-14 . “Risk-reducing program” means a program that adheres to those elements that are shown in research to reduce recidivism.
  3. In each case where the board grants an application prior to the time set by the applicable standard or denies an application on or after the time set by that standard, the board shall set forth in writing the rationale for its determination.

History of Section. P.L. 1982, ch. 375, § 10; P.L. 2000, ch. 109, § 22; P.L. 2008, ch. 9, art. 7, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 1, and P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Constitutional Right.

This section creates a cognizable liberty interest in the Rhode Island parole scheme. Petrarca v. Rhode Island, 583 F. Supp. 297 (D.R.I. 1984). In accord with Petrarca v. Rhode Island, 583 F. Supp. 297, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18342 (D.R.I. 1984). See Bishop v. State, 667 A.2d 275, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 261 (R.I. 1995).

— Ex Post Facto Clause.

The application of parole-board guidelines promulgated after the defendant’s murder conviction to his application for parole did not constitute a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights under the ex post facto clause. State v. Tillinghast, 609 A.2d 217, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 137 (R.I. 1992).

Life Sentence.

The parole board did not act arbitrarily in denying the request for parole of a prisoner convicted of first-degree sexual assault in 1981 and sentenced to life imprisonment, because the prisoner was not eligible for parole until he had served at least 15 years. The Rhode Island Parole Board Guidelines provide that “a person convicted and sentenced to prison on a charge of first-degree sexual assault . . . should serve two-thirds (2/3) of his/her sentence before being considered for parole release”. Since the board employed a period of 30 years when computing the parole eligibility of an inmate serving a life sentence, it would have been completely justified in ruling that the prisoner would not have been eligible for parole consideration until 20 years (not to mention 15 years) had elapsed, which by clear implication would have been two-thirds of the life sentence. State v. Acquisto, 619 A.2d 428, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 5 (R.I. 1993).

13-8-14.2. Special parole consideration for persons convicted as juveniles.

  1. When a person who is serving a sentence imposed as the result of an offense or offenses committed when he or she was less than eighteen years of age becomes eligible for parole pursuant to applicable provisions of law, the parole board shall ensure that he or she is provided a meaningful opportunity to obtain release and shall adopt rules and guidelines to do so, consistent with existing law.
  2. During a parole hearing involving a person described in subsection (a) of this section, in addition to other factors required by law or under the parole guidelines set forth by the parole board, the parole board shall also take into consideration the diminished culpability of juveniles as compared to that of adults and any subsequent growth and increased maturity of the prisoner during incarceration. The board shall also consider the following:
    1. A review of educational and court documents;
    2. Participation in available rehabilitative and educational programs while in prison;
    3. Age at the time of the offense;
    4. Immaturity at the time of the offense;
    5. Home and community environment at the time of the offense;
    6. Efforts made toward rehabilitation;
    7. Evidence of remorse; and
    8. Any other factors or circumstances the board considers relevant.
  3. The parole board shall have access to all relevant records and information in the possession of any state official or agency relating to the board’s consideration of the factors detailed in the foregoing sections.

History of Section. P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 2, effective July 6, 2021.

13-8-15. [Obsolete.]

Obsolete Sections.

This section (P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 4; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 4; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-15 ), concerning parole of prisoners sentenced prior to 1915, is obsolete.

13-8-16. Terms of parole.

  1. Every permit issued by the parole board under this chapter shall entitle the prisoner to whom it is issued to be at liberty upon parole during the remainder of the term which he or she is under sentence to serve, upon any terms and conditions that the board may see fit in its discretion to prescribe, and the acceptance of the permit by the prisoner shall constitute an agreement on the part of the prisoner to abide by and conform to those terms and conditions.
  2. When a prisoner is released on parole to serve a sentence in another state, the board shall request that the receiving state notify the board immediately upon the prisoner’s release from the correctional facility in the receiving state. The executive secretary of the board shall, within five (5) days of receipt of the notice, notify the state police and the local police departments as set forth in § 13-8-9.1 of the release of the prisoner.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 5; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3129, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-16 ; P.L. 1983, ch. 215, § 1; P.L. 2002, ch. 319, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

Compiler’s Notes.

The section as it appears above has been edited by the compiler to include the changes made by the 2002 Reenactment of this title which were not included in the 2002 amendment.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Electronic Monitoring Program.

Defendant was at liberty on parole under R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 13-8-16(a) and 13-8-9 , even with a condition that defendant cooperate with an electronic monitoring program, to which defendant assented, and under R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-19(b) , defendant could not receive credit for time spent on community confinement after violating defendant’s parole. Curtis v. State, 996 A.2d 601, 2010 R.I. LEXIS 70 (R.I. 2010).

Revocation of Parole.

Where parolee was arrested and convicted of a subsequent crime prior to the date of expiration of his first sentence this automatically revoked his parole and it mattered not that specific revocation by the parole board took place after the original sentence had expired. Lee v. Gough, 86 R.I. 23 , 133 A.2d 779, 1957 R.I. LEXIS 81 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 874, 78 S. Ct. 125, 2 L. Ed. 2d 78, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 234 (1957).

Collateral References.

The propriety of conditioning parole on defendant’s not entering specified geographical area. 54 A.L.R.5th 743.

13-8-16.1. Terms of parole — Certain drug offenses.

Every person who shall be placed on parole for a violation of any section of chapter 28 of title 21 prohibiting the unlawful sale, distribution, manufacturing, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture, sell, distribute, or deliver any controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II in chapter 28 of title 21, or possession of a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II in chapter 28 of title 21, shall, as a condition of parole, be required to, at his or her own expense, submit to drug testing in accordance with the standards and procedures of the department of health, not less than once per month.

History of Section. P.L. 1990, ch. 457, § 3.

13-8-17. Reports and control by division of field services.

  1. For the duration of the prisoner’s parole, the assistant director of field services or his or her designee shall report on the adjustment of the parolee to the parole board at the end of each six (6) months of parole.
  2. If at any time there is evidence of a violation of any of the conditions of the parole, the assistant director of field services or his or her designee shall report the violation immediately and fully to the board, together with a recommendation concerning the action to be taken by the board with respect to the parole.
  3. In those instances of violation, the assistant director of field services or his or her designee may in his or her discretion return the parolee to the institution from which he or she was paroled, pending action by the board.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 5; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3129, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-17 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 5.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

Cross References.

Arrest of parole violators without warrant, § 12-7-17 .

Authority of assistant director, §§ 42-56-4(d), 42-56-5 , 42-56-7 .

Out-of-state parolee supervision, § 13-9-1 et seq.

Return of parolees from outside state, § 12-18-2 .

13-8-18. Revocation of parole — Hearing.

The parole board may, by a majority vote of all of its members, revoke, in accordance with the provisions of § 13-8-18.1 , any permit issued by it to any prisoner under the provisions of this chapter or revoke any permit issued by another state or jurisdiction where the prisoner is being supervised by the Rhode Island parole board whenever it shall appear to the board that the prisoner has violated any of the terms or conditions of his or her permit or conditions of parole set by an out-of-state jurisdiction, or has during the period of his or her parole violated any state laws. Whenever it shall come to the knowledge of the board that any prisoner at liberty under a permit issued by this state or another state or jurisdiction has been guilty of a violation of parole related to a new criminal charge, the chairperson shall issue his or her warrant to any officer authorized to serve criminal process to arrest the prisoner and commit him or her to the adult correctional institutions, to be detained until the board shall have an opportunity to determine whether the permit of the prisoner is to be revoked in accordance with the provisions of § 13-8-18.1 , or in the case of prisoners granted parole by another state or jurisdiction, and supervised by the Rhode Island parole board, until that state or jurisdiction takes custody of the prisoner. Whenever it shall come to the knowledge of the board that any prisoner at liberty under a permit issued by this state or another state or jurisdiction has been guilty of a technical violation of parole, absent a new criminal charge, the chairperson may, at his or her discretion, issue his or her warrant to any officer authorized to serve criminal process to arrest the prisoner and commit him or her to the adult correctional institutions, to be detained until the board shall have an opportunity to determine whether the permit of the prisoner is to be revoked in accordance with the provisions of § 13-8-18.1, or in the case of prisoners granted parole by another state or jurisdiction, and supervised by the Rhode Island parole board, until that state or jurisdiction takes custody of the prisoner. If the board shall determine that the permit shall not be revoked, then the board shall immediately order the prisoner to be set at liberty under the terms and conditions of his or her original permit.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 5; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3129, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-18 ; P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 2; P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 2; P.L. 2013, ch. 101, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 111, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 3, effective July 6, 2021.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 2, and P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 2, enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2013, ch. 101, § 1, and P.L. 2013, ch. 111, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Hearing.

Where a parole board issued a detention warrant for a prisoner and, after his apprehension, on the erroneous theory that the indorsement of an erroneous expiration date of his term on his parole permit rendered it void, withdrew the warrant and recommitted him, without a hearing to revoke his parole, such recommitment was error and the prisoner was entitled to be released. Grieco v. Langlois, 103 R.I. 645 , 240 A.2d 595, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 844 (1968).

Strict rules of evidence need not be followed in parole violation hearings. State v. DeRoche, 120 R.I. 523 , 389 A.2d 1229, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 704 (1978).

Although the evidentiary standards in a violation hearing are not as rigid as those which are applicable in a criminal trial, nevertheless, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses is required, unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation. State v. DeRoche, 120 R.I. 523 , 389 A.2d 1229, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 704 (1978).

Before admitting hearsay, particularly on issues which are central to the determination of the commission of a parole violation, the trial justice must determine whether there is good cause for denying confrontation and/or cross-examination. State v. DeRoche, 120 R.I. 523 , 389 A.2d 1229, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 704 (1978).

A petitioner was denied his due-process right to confrontation when the hearing officer, at the preliminary hearing stage of parole revocation proceedings, permitted a police detective to read the hearsay declarations of two child witnesses into evidence. Gaze v. State, 521 A.2d 125, 1987 R.I. LEXIS 421 (R.I. 1987).

Review.

A hearing is not required for the granting of parole and such proceeding does not fall under the definition of a contested case under § 42-35-1 ; therefore, the judicial review section in the Administrative Procedures Act, § 42-35-1 5, is inapplicable. Pine v. Clark, 636 A.2d 1319, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 27 (R.I. 1994).

— Superior Court.

Superior court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction in a case which attempted to review the parole board’s decision in releasing a prisoner. Pine v. Clark, 636 A.2d 1319, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 27 (R.I. 1994).

Collateral References.

Right to notice and hearing before revocation. 44 A.L.R.3d 306.

13-8-18.1. Preliminary parole violation hearing.

  1. As soon as is practicable after a detention for an alleged violation of parole, the parole board shall afford the alleged parole violator a preliminary parole revocation hearing before a hearing officer designated by the board. The hearing officer shall not have had any prior supervisory involvement over the alleged violator.
  2. The alleged violator shall, within five (5) days of the detention, in Rhode Island be given written notice of the time, place, and purpose of the preliminary hearing. The notice shall state the specific conditions of parole that are alleged to have been violated and in what manner. The notice shall also inform the alleged violator of the following rights in connection with the preliminary hearing:
    1. The right to appear and speak in his or her own behalf;
    2. The right to call witnesses and present evidence;
    3. The right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him or her, unless the hearing officer finds on the record that a witness may be subjected to risk of harm if his or her identity is revealed; and
    4. The right to retain counsel and, if unable to afford counsel, the right under certain circumstances to the appointment of counsel for the preliminary hearing.

      The determination of whether or not the alleged violator is entitled to appointed counsel, if such a request is made, shall be made on the record and in accordance with all relevant statutory and constitutional provisions.

  3. The notice form must explain in clear and unambiguous language the procedures established by the parole board concerning an alleged violator’s exercise of the rights denominated in subsection (b), including the mechanism for compelling the attendance of witnesses; the mechanism for obtaining documentary evidence; and the mechanism for requesting the appointment of counsel.
  4. The preliminary hearing shall take place no later than ten (10) days after service of notice set forth in subsection (b). A preliminary hearing may be postponed beyond the ten-day (10) time limit for good cause at the request of either party, but may not be postponed at the request of the state for more than five (5) additional days. The parole revocation charges shall be dismissed with prejudice if a preliminary hearing is not conducted within the time period established by this paragraph, not including any delay directly attributed to a postponement requested by the alleged violator.
  5. If the alleged violator has requested the appointment of counsel at least five (5) days prior to the preliminary hearing, the preliminary hearing may not proceed without counsel present unless the hearing officer finds on the record, in accordance with all relevant statutory and constitutional provisions, that the alleged violator is not entitled to appointed counsel. If the alleged violator is found to have been entitled to counsel and no such counsel has been appointed, the parole violation charges must be dismissed with prejudice. If the request for counsel was made four (4) or fewer days in advance of the preliminary hearing, the time limit within which the preliminary hearing must be held may be extended up to five (5) additional days.
  6. The standard of proof at the preliminary hearing shall be probable cause to believe that the alleged violator has violated one or more conditions of his or her parole and that the violation or violations were not de minimus in nature. Proof of conviction of a crime committed subsequent to release on parole shall constitute probable cause for the purposes of the preliminary hearing.
  7. At the preliminary hearing, the hearing officer shall review the violation charges with the alleged violator; direct the presentation of the evidence concerning the alleged violation; receive the statements of the witnesses and documentary evidence; and allow cross-examination of those witnesses in attendance. All proceedings shall be recorded and preserved.
  8. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, the hearing officer shall inform the alleged violator of his or her decision as to whether there is probable cause to believe that the alleged violator has violated one or more conditions of his or her parole and, if so, whether the violation or violations were de minimus in nature. Those determinations shall be based solely on the evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing. The hearing officer shall state in writing the reasons for his or her determinations and the evidence relied upon for those determinations. A copy of the written findings shall be sent to the alleged violator, and his or her counsel if applicable, within fourteen (14) days of the preliminary hearing.
  9. If the hearing officer finds that there is no probable cause to believe that the alleged violator has violated one or more conditions of his or her parole or that the violation or violations, if any, were de minimus in nature, the parole chairperson shall rescind the detention warrant and direct that the alleged violator, unless in custody for other reasons, be released and restored to parole supervision.
  10. If the hearing officer finds that there is probable cause to believe that the alleged violator has violated one or more conditions of his or her parole and that the violation or violations were not de minimus in nature, the alleged violator shall be held for a final parole revocation hearing. A final parole revocation hearing must be held as soon as is practicable, but in no event more than ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the preliminary hearing.
  11. An alleged violator may waive his or her right to a preliminary hearing. The waiver must be in written form. In the event of such a written waiver, a final parole revocation hearing must be held as soon as is practicable, but in no event more than ninety (90) days after the right to a preliminary hearing is waived. Notwithstanding the above, a final parole revocation hearing may be continued by the alleged violator beyond the ninety-day (90) time period. For parole violations not involving a new criminal offense, an alleged violator may waive his or her right to a final parole revocation hearing, where there is no dispute as to the alleged violation and the parolee charged with the violation(s) freely admits to the violation and accepts the appropriate sanction imposed by the parole board.

History of Section. P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 1; P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 3, effective July 6, 2021.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 1, and P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 1, enacted identical versions of this section.

13-8-19. Arrest and return to institution on revocation of parole.

  1. Whenever the permit of a prisoner is revoked, in accordance with the provisions of § 13-8-18.1 the parole board shall order the prisoner to be returned to the adult correctional institutions or to the women’s division of the adult correctional institutions, as the case may be, to serve the remainder of the prisoner’s original sentence according to the terms of that sentence.
  2. The time between the release of the prisoner under the permit and the prisoner’s return to the adult correctional institutions or the women’s division of the adult correctional institutions under order of the board may be considered as any part of the prisoner’s original sentence. The parole board may choose to credit or revoke all or part of the time while released under the permit from the original sentence, taking into consideration the seriousness of the violation that prompted revocation. The board shall adopt standards to be utilized in determining whether to credit all or part of the time served under the permit from the original sentence.
  3. If a prisoner is at liberty when the prisoner’s permit is revoked, the chairperson shall issue his or her warrant to any officer authorized to serve criminal process to arrest the prisoner and return the prisoner to the adult correctional institutions or the women’s division of the adult correctional institutions in accordance with the provisions of § 13-8-18.1 as ordered by the board.
  4. Where the prisoner is supervised by the parole board pursuant to a grant of parole by a state or jurisdiction other than Rhode Island, the parole board shall issue a detention warrant and order the prisoner committed to the adult correctional institution or the women’s division of the adult correctional institution until the authority from the state or other jurisdiction having granted the prisoner parole takes custody of the prisoner.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 5; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3129, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-19 ; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 5; P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 2; P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 2; P.L. 2013, ch. 101, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 111, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 1.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment added the subsection designations.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2003, ch. 209, § 1, and P.L. 2003, ch. 369, § 1, enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2013, ch. 101, § 1, and P.L. 2013, ch. 111, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 1, and P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Cross References.

Arrest of parole violators without warrant, § 12-7-17 .

Return of parolees from outside state, § 12-18-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

A parolee cannot be recommitted to prison without revoking his parole. Grieco v. Langlois, 103 R.I. 645 , 240 A.2d 595, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 844 (1968).

Where the inmate challenged pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-24 the reduction of the inmate’s good-time credits that resulted from the reduction of the inmate’s sentence on appeal from a 10-year sentence to a six-year sentence, although the inmate was released on parole, the case was not moot, as a parole violation could have resulted in the inmate’s return to prison to complete the remainder of the sentence pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-19(a) . Morey v. Wall, 849 A.2d 621, 2004 R.I. LEXIS 113 (R.I. 2004).

Credit for Time Served.

After revocation of a parole, the prisoner must serve the remainder of his original term and is not entitled to credit for the period during which he was at liberty on parole. Lee v. Kindelan, 80 R.I. 212 , 95 A.2d 51, 1953 R.I. LEXIS 54 , cert. denied, 345 U.S. 1000, 73 S. Ct. 1146, 97 L. Ed. 1406, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1975 (1953).

Where defendant agreed with reformatory board as to parole that when permit was revoked or became void the board could issue an order authorizing his arrest and return to place of confinement and that in computing period of confinement the time between release upon said permit and return to place of confinement should not be considered, the revocation of the parole permit was authorized by statute and the legislature did not usurp the prerogative of the judiciary in so providing, therefore petitioner was lawfully remanded to custody without benefit of any reduction of time. Rondoni v. Langlois, 90 R.I. 322 , 153 A.2d 163 (1960).

Defendant was at liberty on parole under R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 13-8-16(a) and 13-8-9 , even with a condition that defendant cooperate with an electronic monitoring program, to which defendant assented, and under R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-8-19(b) , defendant could not receive credit for time spent on community confinement after violating defendant’s parole. Curtis v. State, 996 A.2d 601, 2010 R.I. LEXIS 70 (R.I. 2010).

13-8-20. Service of original sentence by parolee committing offense while on parole.

If a prisoner, at the time the prisoner’s permit is revoked, is confined in any penal institution on any criminal process or under sentence for any offense committed while the prisoner was at liberty upon parole, the order of the parole board for the prisoner’s return to the adult correctional institutions or the women’s division of the adult correctional institutions, to serve the remainder of the prisoner’s original sentence, shall be served upon the release of the prisoner from the penal institution in which the prisoner is confined, and it shall be discretionary with the board as to whether or not the remainder of the prisoner’s original sentence runs concurrently with or consecutively to any other sentence.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 5; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3129, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-20 ; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 5.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Not only is it within the power of the legislature to provide that one who violates his parole must serve the balance of the original term and the term imposed for the violation consecutively but it is also clearly within its power to provide that the balance of the original term shall be served only if a parole board in its sole discretion revokes the conditional release or parole given to the offender. State v. Fazzano, 96 R.I. 472 , 194 A.2d 680, 1963 R.I. LEXIS 114 (1963).

Violation of Deferred Sentence.

The validity of the mandate in this section applies as well where the parolee at the time of the revocation of his parole is confined in a penal institution by virtue of having been sentenced for a violation of a deferred sentence as it does where such imprisonment has come about as the result of a conviction for a crime committed while at liberty on parole. State v. Fazzano, 96 R.I. 472 , 194 A.2d 680, 1963 R.I. LEXIS 114 (1963).

13-8-21. Signature and sealing of instruments — Recognition by officers.

All permits and orders of the parole board issued under the authority of this chapter shall be signed by the chairperson and one other member of the board. The board shall have a seal which shall be affixed to all permits and orders issued by it, and to all warrants issued by the chairperson, under the authority of this chapter. All permits and orders of the board so signed and sealed, and all warrants issued by the chairperson under the authority of this chapter, shall be recognized by all sheriffs and their deputies, all officers authorized to serve criminal process, the police officers of the several cities and towns, and by the director of the department of corrections, or his or her designee, and by the keeper of any other place where prisoners are confined or detained in this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 7; 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-21 ; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 5.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Finality.

The parole board properly rescinded a prior vote on a prisoner’s parole because it had not given its final approval for parole under this section. Yang v. State, 703 A.2d 754, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 312 (R.I. 1997).

13-8-22. Manner of obtaining information by parole board.

The parole board, in the discharge of its duties under this chapter, shall not be required to receive or consider any petition, and it may secure the information upon which it exercises its authority, or upon which it makes its findings in any case, in any manner and by any means that it may consider most fitting to carry out the purposes of this chapter; provided, it shall be the duty of the clerks of courts, the sheriffs and their deputies, the police officers of cities and towns, the probation officers, the officers of the adult correctional institutions, and every person having charge of any other place where prisoners are confined or detained, to furnish to the board and to any member of the board, whenever requested by the board or by any member of it, any and all information they may have relating to the character and history of any prisoner whose sentence is placed under the control of the board by this chapter. In the case of prisoners transferred to federal institutions under the provisions of § 13-12-1 , the board may, in its discretion, arrange to obtain information concerning those prisoners from the appropriate officials of the United States Bureau of Prisons. That information shall include, but not be limited to, testimony of the prisoner being considered for parole, and official records and reports, including recommendations concerning the prisoners. The board is authorized to request of the contracting authority the inclusion of provisions for obtaining that information in contracts made pursuant to § 13-12-1 .

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, §§ 7, 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 7; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-22 ; P.L. 1970, ch. 117, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section is set out to correct an error appearing in the 2000 Reenactment volume.

13-8-23. Parties required to provide reports to parole board.

Information concerning applicants for parole shall be provided by:

  1. The director of corrections, who shall submit a list of all prisoners under his or her control who will be eligible for parole in a given month, not later than the tenth day of the second month preceding. That list shall identify the prisoner by name, offense, and date of commitment;
  2. The director of corrections, who shall secure reports from prison officials and institutional personnel who have had direct contact with the prisoner including, but not limited to, prison administrators, the classification board, mental health counselors, correctional officers, and medical personnel. The director shall transmit those reports, together with all pertinent classification information, including social history and information pertaining to the prisoner’s disciplinary record, participation in rehabilitation and educational programs, employment history and plan, housing plan, community supports, mental health status and needs, substance abuse status and needs, discharge plan, and any actions or recommendations made by a classification board or committee in the institution, to the board not later than the twentieth day of the month next preceding the month in which the individual is eligible to appear before the board;
  3. The attorney general’s department, which shall supply to the board a written report of its recommendation concerning the current application for parole. The report shall set forth in detail the reason or reasons why the particular inmate, given his or her criminal history and the circumstances surrounding his or her offense, should or should not be paroled. The department shall also consult the trial judge in the case to determine if he or she may wish to make any comment or recommendation; and if requested by the board, the department shall have one of its attorneys present at the board hearings to elaborate on the attorney general’s recommendation as to parole of the inmate;
  4. When deemed necessary by the board, a psychiatrist, who shall examine the prisoner upon notice from the board and shall submit his or her findings and recommendations to the board not later than the twentieth day of the month next preceding the month in which the prisoner is eligible to appear before the board;
  5. Licensed mental health professionals who shall upon notice from the board examine the prisoner and report their findings and recommendations to the board not later than the twentieth day of the month next preceding the month in which the prisoner is eligible to appear before the board;
  6. The department of corrections, which shall submit: (i) a transcript of the previous criminal record of the prisoner, including the date of offenses, nature of offenses, and the disposition of each; (ii) a copy of the pre-sentence investigation; and (iii) a full summary of the contact of the department with the prisoner during any prior period under supervision, either probation or parole or both. The department shall make a written recommendation concerning the current application for parole.

History of Section. G.L., ch. 617, § 8; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2724, § 2; impl. am. P.L. 1956, ch. 3721, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-23 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9; P.L. 1976, ch. 290, § 5; P.L. 1989, ch. 419, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 2.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment substituted ‘The director of corrections” for “The assistant director of adult services” in subdivisions (1) and (2).

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 3, provides: “The director shall submit a quarterly report to the chairs of the house and senate finance committees and their respective fiscal advisors on the progress of closing the Donald Price medium security facility.”

13-8-24. Case reports to director of corrections.

The parole board shall prepare a report for each application approved, denied, or continued, containing: (1) a summary of the facts and considerations on which the decision was based; (2) the majority decision of the board, including any special conditions to be required of the parolee; and (3) the dissent, if any, and the reasons for that dissent; and signed by the members of the board. Copies of those reports shall be sent to the director of corrections.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 9; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-24 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9.

13-8-25. Annual reports of board.

The parole board shall annually report its activities during each fiscal year to the director of corrections, and this shall be incorporated in a report to the governor.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 9; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-25 ; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 9.

13-8-26. Statements by interested individuals or families.

All individuals, members of the family, friends, legal counsel, agencies, or other interested persons desiring to make a statement with respect to a particular applicant for parole, shall submit it in writing for inclusion in the applicant’s folder, as provided in § 13-8-6 .

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 10; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-26 .

13-8-27. Fees and allowances of officers.

Every officer rendering any service, by order of the parole board or the chairperson, under this chapter shall be paid any fees and allowances that are authorized by law to be paid for like service in a criminal case, and the state controller is authorized and directed to draw his or her orders on the general treasurer for payment out of the appropriation for the payment of officers’ fees in criminal cases, upon receipt by him or her of proper vouchers duly authenticated and approved by the chairperson.

History of Section. P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 9; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 9; P.L. 1946, ch. 1687, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 13; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-27 .

13-8-28. [Obsolete.]

Obsolete Sections.

This section (P.L. 1915, ch. 1186, § 12; G.L. 1923, ch. 414, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 617, § 15; P.L. 1949, ch. 2161, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-28 ), concerning the effect of chapter 8 of title 13 on sentences for offenses committed before 1915, is obsolete.

13-8-29. Authority of parole board to grant parole to federal prisoners.

The board may have in its discretion the power to consider an application for parole from a prisoner confined to a federal institution pursuant to chapter 12 of title 13, and to act on that application while the prisoner is still detained in the institution; provided, that the board obtain information concerning the prisoner in compliance with § 13-8-22 .

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 117, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-8-29 .

Cross References.

Manner of obtaining information by board, § 13-8-22 .

13-8-30. Community supervision for child molestation offenses.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the general laws to the contrary, any person convicted of first degree child molestation pursuant to § 11-37-8.1 or second degree child molestation pursuant to § 11-37-8.3 shall, in addition to any other penalty imposed, be subject to community supervision upon that person’s completion of any prison sentence, suspended sentence, and/or probationary term imposed as a result of that conviction.

In the case of a person convicted of first degree child molestation pursuant to § 11-37-8.1 , community supervision shall be for life and pursuant to the provisions of § 11-37-8.2.1 , community supervision shall include electronic monitoring via an active global positioning system for life. In the case of a person eighteen (18) years or older convicted of second degree child molestation pursuant to § 11-37-8.3 , the term of the original sentence imposed and the term of community supervision shall not exceed thirty (30) years.

History of Section. P.L. 1998, ch. 375, § 1; P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 5; P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 5.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 5, and P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 5, enacted identical amendments to this section.

Law Reviews.

Legislation Survey Section: Criminal Offense, see 4 R.W.U.L. Rev. 836 (1999).

13-8-31. Community supervision board.

There shall be established a community supervision board which shall be comprised of the parole board.

History of Section. P.L. 1998, ch. 375, § 1.

13-8-32. Community supervision.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person who has been placed on community supervision shall be subject to the provisions of law governing parole as if the person were a parolee. The parole board shall impose terms and conditions for the sentence within thirty (30) days of sentencing. The terms and conditions may be revised, altered, and amended by the parole board at any time.
  2. A person under community supervision shall be under the jurisdiction, supervision and control of the parole board in the same manner as a person under parole supervision. The board is authorized on an individual basis to establish any conditions of community supervision that may be necessary to ensure public safety, which may include protecting the public from a person committing a sex offense including child molestation or child kidnapping as well as promoting the rehabilitation of the person. The conditions shall include at the expense of the offender sex offender treatment with a recognized treatment provider in the field to be determined by the board for as long as the board deems necessary, and compliance with the requirements of chapter 37 of title 11.
  3. The board is authorized to impose and enforce a supervision fee, and rehabilitation fee upon a person on community supervision. To the extent possible the board shall set the fee in an amount that will substantially defray the cost of the community supervision program.
  4. The board shall also establish a fee waiver procedure for hardship cases and indigency.
  5. After a person sentenced to community supervision has been under supervision for a period of fifteen (15) years or any time after the person ceases to be a resident of the state, the person may petition the board for termination of community supervision. A petition for termination which is based upon the person no longer being a resident of Rhode Island shall be accompanied by an affidavit of the person attesting to his or her non-residency and providing his or her new out of state address. A petition for termination which is based upon the completion of fifteen (15) years of community supervision may only occur by a majority vote of all the members of the community supervision board. Termination may only occur by a majority vote of all the members. Upon receiving a petition for termination, the board shall, within sixty (60) days, conduct a hearing before the full membership. At least thirty (30) days prior to a hearing on the petition, the board shall cause a criminal history check to be conducted, and notify in writing the victims of the crime for which the sentence was imposed, the attorney general, and the chief of police or head of the organized police department of the municipality in which the crime was committed, and the chief of police or head of the organized police department of the municipality in which the person resides, of the person’s petition for release from community supervision. Those officials and victims shall be provided the opportunity to respond to the petition. The officials and victims may appear in person or be represented or make written recommendations to the board, but failure of any or all of the officials to appear or make recommendations shall not delay the termination procedure.
  6. If a victim is deceased at the time the termination hearing is scheduled the deceased victim may be represented by his relatives in the following order: mother, father, spouse, child, grandchild, brother or sister, niece or nephew.
  7. Prior to the hearing, the petitioner shall be examined, personally interviewed and evaluated by a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist, who is an expert in the field of sex offender treatment and approved by the board. The psychiatrist or psychologist shall file written reports with the board of his or her examinations and diagnoses, and his or her recommendation for the disposition of the person. The petitioner’s treatment while on community supervision shall be examined and considered by the psychiatrist or psychologist in the recommendation. The reports shall be admissible in a hearing pursuant to this section. If the person refuses, without good cause, to be personally interviewed by the psychiatrist or psychologist, the person shall be deemed to have waived his or her right to a hearing on the petition, and the petition shall be dismissed by the board. The cost of the examination and evaluation shall be the responsibility of the person petitioning for release from supervision; provided, that procedures shall be established for cases of hardship or indigency.
  8. At the hearing, the board shall call any witnesses that it deems necessary, including the examining psychiatrist or psychologist, the attorney general, the police chief or the victims of the crime or his or her family member, as the board deems necessary. The petitioner may offer any witnesses and other proof at the hearing that is relevant to the petition.
  9. The board shall terminate community supervision if the petitioner demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she has not committed a sex offense of child kidnapping since his or her conviction, that he or she is not likely to pose a threat to the safety of others, and that the public interest is not served by further community supervision.
  10. If a petition for release from supervision is denied by the board, the person may not file another petition for a period of three (3) years.

History of Section. P.L. 1998, ch. 375, § 1; P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 5; P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 5.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment redesignated the subsections.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 5, and P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 5, enacted identical amendments to this section.

13-8-33. Violations of community supervision — penalties.

Any person who violates a condition of community supervision shall be guilty of a separate offense and, upon conviction, shall be sentenced to no more than one year in prison; provided, if the violation also constitutes a criminal offense the term of imprisonment shall be consecutive to any sentence received for the commission of the new offense.

History of Section. P.L. 1998, ch. 375, § 1.

13-8-34. Severability.

If any provision of this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

History of Section. P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 6; P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 6.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2006, ch. 206, § 6, and P.L. 2006, ch. 207, § 6, enacted identical versions of this section.

13-8-35. Early termination of parole supervision.

  1. Upon its own motion or upon request of a parolee, the parole board may terminate a parolee’s supervision before the sentence expires.
    1. Seven (7) years after releasing a prisoner on supervision, and at least annually thereafter, the parole board shall review the status of the parolee to determine the need for continued supervision. The parole board shall also conduct a status review whenever the supervision officer recommends early termination of the parolee’s supervision.
    2. Seven (7) years after releasing a prisoner on supervision, excluding a parolee serving a life sentence for first- or second-degree murder, the parole board shall terminate supervision over the parolee unless the parole board determines, after a hearing in accordance with this chapter, that  the supervision should not be terminated because there is a likelihood that the parolee will engage in conduct violating any criminal law. If the parole board does not terminate supervision under this subsection, the parolee may request a hearing annually thereafter, and the parole board shall conduct an early termination hearing at least every two (2) years.
    3. In calculating the two-year (2) and seven-year (7) periods provided in this section, the parole board shall not include any period of parole before the recent release, or any period served in confinement or any other sentence.
    4. A parolee may not appeal an adverse decision under this section.
  2. The parole board shall promulgate guidelines  that effectuate the purpose of this section, which is to provide a mechanism for eliminating supervision on parole, in deserving cases, consistent with the rehabilitative and reentry needs of the parolee and the promotion of public safety.

    In determining whether to grant early termination from supervision, the parole board shall consider its guidelines and promulgate new guidelines so as to effectuate the purpose of this section, which is to provide a mechanism for eliminating supervision on parole, in deserving cases, consistent with the rehabilitative and reentry needs of the parolee and the promotion of public safety. Termination of supervision is indicated if the parolee:

    1. Has been on supervised parole for the required period;
    2. Has observed all the laws within and without the state;
    3. Has been employed and remains employed at the time of the request; and
    4. Has completed seven (7) continuous years of supervision and is free from an incident of new criminal behavior or serious parole violation.
  3. As used in this section, the term an “incident of new criminal behavior” or “serious parole violation” includes a new arrest or report of a parole violation, if supported by substantial evidence of guilt, even if no conviction or parole revocation results. The parole board shall not terminate supervision until it determines the disposition of a pending criminal charge.
  4. Case-specific factors that may justify a departure either above or below the early termination may relate to the current behavior of the parolee, or the parolee’s background and criminal history.

History of Section. P.L. 2021, ch. 375, § 1, effective July 13, 2021; P.L. 2021, ch. 376, § 1, effective July 13, 2021.

Compiler's Notes.

P.L. 2021, ch. 375, § 1, and P.L. 2021, ch. 376, § 1 enacted identical versions of this section.

Chapter 8.1 Medical and Geriatric Parole

13-8.1-1. Short title.

This chapter shall be known as the “Medical and Geriatric Parole Act”.

History of Section. P.L. 1999, ch. 297, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 4, effective July 6, 2021.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment rewrote the section heading.

13-8.1-2. Purpose.

  1. Medical parole is made available for humanitarian reasons and to alleviate exorbitant medical expenses associated with inmates whose chronic and incurable illness render their incarceration non-punitive and non-rehabilitative. Notwithstanding other statutory or administrative provisions to the contrary, all prisoners, except those serving life without parole, shall at any time after they begin serving their sentences be eligible for medical parole consideration, regardless of the crime committed or the sentence imposed.
  2. Geriatric parole is made available for humanitarian reasons and to alleviate exorbitant expenses associated with the cost of aging, for inmates whose advanced age reduces the risk that they pose to the public safety. Notwithstanding other statutory or administrative provisions to the contrary, all prisoners except those serving life without parole shall be eligible for geriatric parole consideration upon meeting the criteria set forth below, regardless of the crime committed or the sentence imposed.

History of Section. P.L. 1999, ch. 297, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 4, effective July 6, 2021.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1, P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1, and P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 3, provides: “The director shall submit a quarterly report to the chairs of the house and senate finance committees and their respective fiscal advisors on the progress of closing the Donald Price medium security facility.”

13-8.1-3. Definitions.

  1. “Aging prisoner” means an individual who is sixty-five (65) years of age or older and suffers from functional impairment, infirmity, or illness.
  2. “Cognitively incapacitated” means suffering from a cognitive condition, such as dementia, that greatly impairs activities that are necessary for independence such as feeding, toileting, dressing, and bathing and renders their incarceration non-punitive and non-rehabilitative.
  3. “Permanently physically incapacitated” means suffering from a physical condition caused by injury, disease, illness, or persistent vegetative state, that, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, permanently and irreversibly physically incapacitates the individual to the extent that the individual needs help with most of the activities that are necessary for independence, such as feeding, toileting, dressing, and bathing and transferring, or no significant physical activity is possible, or suffering from an incurable, progressive condition that substantially diminishes the individual’s capacity to function in a correctional setting.
  4. “Severely ill” means suffering from a significant and permanent or chronic physical and/or mental condition that: (1) Requires extensive medical and/or psychiatric treatment with little to no possibility of recovery; and (2) Significantly impairs rehabilitation from further incarceration.
  5. “Terminally ill” means suffering from a condition caused by injury (except self-inflicted injury), disease, or illness which, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, is a life-limiting diagnosis that will lead to profound functional, cognitive and/or physical decline, and likely will result in death within eighteen (18) months.

History of Section. P.L. 1999, ch. 297, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 2; P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 2; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 4, effective July 6, 2021.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1, P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1, and P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 3, provides: “The director shall submit a quarterly report to the chairs of the house and senate finance committees and their respective fiscal advisors on the progress of closing the Donald Price medium security facility.”

P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 2, and P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 2 enacted identical amendments to this section.

13-8.1-4. Procedure.

  1. The parole board is authorized to grant medical parole release of a prisoner, except a prisoner serving life without parole, at any time, who is determined to be terminally ill, severely ill, or permanently physically or cognitively incapacitated within the meaning of § 13-8.1-3(2) -(5).
  2. The parole board is authorized to grant geriatric parole release of a prisoner, except a prisoner serving life without parole, who is an aging prisoner within the meaning of § 13-8.1-3(1) or under medical parole as outlined by § 13-8.1-2 .
  3. In order to apply for this relief, the prisoner or his or her family member or friend, with an attending physician’s written approval, or an attending physician, on behalf of the prisoner, shall file an application with the director of the department of corrections. Within seventy-two (72) hours after the filing of any application, the director shall refer the application to the health service unit of the department of corrections for a medical report and a medical or geriatric discharge plan to be completed within ten (10) days. Upon receipt of the discharge plan, the director of the department of corrections shall immediately transfer the discharge plan, together with the application, to the parole board for its consideration and decision.
  4. The report shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
    1. Diagnosis of the prisoner’s medical conditions, including related medical history;
    2. Detailed description of the conditions and treatments;
    3. Prognosis, including life expectancy, likelihood of recovery, likelihood of improvement, mobility and trajectory, and rate of debilitation;
    4. Degree of incapacity or disability, including an assessment of whether the prisoner is ambulatory, capable of engaging in any substantial physical activity, ability to independently provide for their daily life activities, and the extent of that activity; and
    5. An opinion from the medical director as to whether the person is terminally ill, and if so, the stage of the illness, or whether the person is permanently physically or cognitively incapacitated, severely ill, or an aging prisoner. If the medical director’s opinion is that the person is not terminally ill, permanently, physically or cognitively incapacitated, severely ill, or an aging prisoner as defined in § 13-8.1-3 , the petition for medical or geriatric parole shall not be forwarded to the parole board.
    6. [Deleted by P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 4.]
  5. When the director of corrections refers a prisoner to the parole board for medical or geriatric parole, the director shall provide to the parole board a medical or geriatric discharge plan that is acceptable to the parole board.
  6. The department of corrections and the parole board shall jointly develop standards for the medical or geriatric discharge plan that are appropriately adapted to the criminal justice setting. The discharge plan should ensure at the minimum that:
    1. An appropriate placement for the prisoner has been secured, including, but not limited to: a hospital, nursing facility, hospice, or family home;
    2. A referral has been made for the prisoner to secure a source for payment of the prisoner’s medical expenses; and
    3. A parole officer has been assigned to periodically obtain updates on the prisoner’s medical condition to report back to the board.
  7. If the parole board finds from the credible medical evidence that the prisoner is terminally ill, permanently physically or cognitively incapacitated, severely ill, or an aging prisoner, the board shall grant release to the prisoner but only after the board also considers whether, in light of the prisoner’s medical condition, there is a reasonable probability that the prisoner, if released, will live and remain at liberty without violating the law, and that the release is compatible with the welfare of society and will not so depreciate the seriousness of the crime as to undermine respect for the law. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, medical or geriatric release may be granted at any time during the term of a prisoner’s sentence.
  8. There shall be a presumption that the opinion of the physician and/or medical director will be accepted. However, the applicant, the physician, the director, or the parole board may request an independent medical evaluation within seven (7) days after the physician’s and/or medical director’s report is presented. The evaluation shall be completed and a report, containing the information required by subsection (d) of this section, filed with the director and the parole board, and a copy sent to the applicant within fourteen (14) days from the date of the request.
  9. Within seven (7) days of receiving the application, the medical or geriatric report and the discharge plan, the parole board shall determine whether the application, on its face, demonstrates that relief may be warranted. If the face of the application clearly demonstrates that relief is unwarranted, the board may deny the application without a hearing or further proceedings, and within seven (7) days shall notify the prisoner in writing of its decision to deny the application, setting forth its factual findings and a brief statement of the reasons for denying release without a hearing. Denial of release does not preclude the prisoner from reapplying for medical or geriatric parole after the expiration of sixty (60) days. A reapplication under this section must demonstrate a material change in circumstances.
    1. Upon receipt of the application from the director of the department of corrections the parole board shall, except as provided in subsection (i) of this section, set the case for a hearing within thirty (30) days;
    2. Notice of the hearing shall be sent to the prosecutor and the victim(s), if any, of the offense(s) for which the prisoner is incarcerated, and the prosecutor and the victim(s) shall have the right to be heard at the hearing, or in writing, or both; and
    3. At the hearing, the prisoner shall be entitled to be represented by an attorney or by the public defender if qualified or other representative.
  10. Within seven (7) days of the hearing, the parole board shall issue a written decision granting or denying medical or geriatric parole and explaining the reasons for the decision. If the board determines that medical or geriatric parole is warranted, it shall impose conditions of release, that shall include the following:
    1. Periodic medical examinations;
    2. Periodic reporting to a parole officer, and the reporting interval;
    3. Any other terms or conditions that the board deems necessary; and
    4. In the case of a prisoner who is medically paroled due to being severely ill, the parole board shall require electronic monitoring as a condition of the medical parole, unless the healthcare plan mandates placement in a medical facility that cannot accommodate the electronic monitoring.
  11. If after release the releasee’s condition or circumstances change so that he or she would not then be eligible for medical or geriatric parole, the parole board may order him or her returned to custody to await a hearing to determine whether his or her release should be revoked. A release may also be revoked for violation of conditions otherwise applicable to parole.
  12. An annual report shall be prepared by the director of corrections for the parole board and the general assembly. The report shall include:
    1. The number of inmates who have applied for medical or geriatric parole;
    2. The number of inmates who have been granted medical or geriatric parole;
    3. The nature of the illness, cognitive condition, functional impairment, and/or infirmity of the applicants, and the nature of the placement pursuant to the discharge plan;
    4. The categories of reasons for denial for those who have been denied;
    5. The number of releasees on medical or geriatric parole who have been returned to the custody of the department of corrections and the reasons for return; and
    6. The number of inmates who meet the statutory definition of “aging prisoner” and would be potentially eligible for geriatric parole.
  13. An annual educational seminar will be offered by the department of corrections healthcare services unit to the parole board and community stakeholders on aging and infirmity in prison and special considerations that should be applied to aging prisoners and prisoners with severe or terminal illnesses during parole consideration.

History of Section. P.L. 1999, ch. 297, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 2; P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 2; P.L. 2021, ch. 162, art. 13, § 4, effective July 6, 2021.

Reenactments.

The 2002 Reenactment redesignated the subsections and subdivisions and substituted “director of corrections” for “director of the department of corrections” in subsection (d) and subdivision ( l )(5).

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 1, P.L. 2011, ch. 176, § 1, and P.L. 2011, ch. 300, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 20, § 3, provides: “The director shall submit a quarterly report to the chairs of the house and senate finance committees and their respective fiscal advisors on the progress of closing the Donald Price medium security facility.”

P.L. 2017, ch. 346, § 2, and P.L. 2017, ch. 352, § 2 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Chapter 8.2 Certificate of Recovery & Re-Entry

13-8.2-1. Certificate of recovery & re-entry established — Findings of the general assembly and purposes.

There is hereby established a certificate of recovery & re-entry for individuals that are convicted of a crime in which their legal status and ability to seek and maintain employment changes forever. A criminal record may prohibit individuals from successfully obtaining jobs, occupational licenses, housing and other benefits and opportunities available to all other individuals. These restrictions are often narrowly tailored and serve to protect society against an unidentified public safety risk, but others are arbitrary, unnecessary and without regard to any post-conviction rehabilitation or recovery & re-entry. Individuals who have successfully completed their board-imposed sentences need to be able to reestablish themselves as law-abiding members of society. At the same time, employers and other decision-makers need to have some reassurance of a person’s reliability. Therefore, the intent and purpose of this chapter is to provide a process that would, in select and appropriate cases, allow the issuance of a certificate of recovery & re-entry. Said certificate, if granted by the parole board, would serve to relieve the petitioner, in appropriate cases, of some of the collateral consequences resulting from his or her criminal record. Said certificate shall serve as one determining factor as to whether the petitioner has been successful in his or her rehabilitation.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1, and P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1 enacted identical versions of this chapter.

Effective Dates.

P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 2, provides that the enactment of this chapter shall take effect one year from date of passage [July 15, 2013].

P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 2, provides that the enactment of this chapter shall take effect one year from date of passage [July 15, 2013].

13-8.2-2. Definitions.

As used in this chapter the following words and terms shall have the following meanings:

  1. “Board” means the parole board within the Rhode Island department of corrections, established pursuant to the provisions of § 13-8-1 .
  2. “Department” means the department of corrections.
  3. “Director” means the director of the department of corrections.
  4. “Eligible petitioner” means a person who has not been convicted of a crime or of an offense as defined in § 11-47-2(5) and in RIGL subdivision 12-1.3-1(1) who has not been convicted of more than one felony.
  5. “Certificate of recovery & re-entry ” or “certificate” shall serve as one determining factor, consistent with concerns of public safety, of the person’s ability to obtain employment, professional licenses, housing and other benefits and opportunities. Provided, further, that said instrument shall serve as a determination that the person receiving it has successfully achieved his or her recovery & re-entry goals as provided for in § 13-8.2-4 .
  6. “Conviction” notwithstanding the provisions of § 12-18-3 , means the imposition of a fine, period of incarceration whether or not suspended, probation or deferred sentence imposed after the entry of a plea of nolo contendere.
  7. “Petition” means the motion, pleading, or other legal document or form seeking the issuance of a certificate of recovery & re-entry from the board.
  8. “Felony” means a conviction of a felony in this state or of an offense, that is not a crime of violence, in any other jurisdiction for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year, was authorized. Criminal acts committed outside the state shall be classified as acts committed within the state.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-3. Rules of construction.

For the purposes of this chapter the following rules of construction, facts and circumstances shall apply:

  1. Two (2) or more convictions of felonies charged in separate counts of one indictment or information shall be deemed to be one conviction;
  2. Two (2) or more convictions of felonies charged in two (2) or more separate indictments or information, where disposition of all indictments or information takes place on the same date, shall be deemed to be one conviction; and
  3. A plea or verdict of guilty upon which a sentence of probation, conditional discharge, or supervision has been imposed shall be deemed to be a conviction.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-4. Procedure for issuance of certificate.

The board shall have the following procedures for certificate of recovery & re-entry hearings:

  1. To hear petitions from individuals seeking an order granting the issuance of a certificate of recovery & re-entry.
  2. To establish the minimum period of recovery & re-entry for individuals referred to in subdivision (1) of this section, as follows:
    1. Where the most serious crime of which the individual was convicted is a misdemeanor, the minimum period of recovery & re-entry shall be one year;
    2. Where the most serious crime of which the individual was convicted is a non-violent felony conviction, the minimum period of recovery & re-entry shall be three (3) years; and
    3. The minimum period of recovery & re-entry by the individual shall be measured either from the date of the payment of any fine imposed upon him or her, or from the date of his or her release from the institutional facility, custody by parole or home confinement, whichever is later.
  3. To classify criminal acts committed outside the state as acts committed within the state based on the non violent nature of the criminal acts and the maximum sentence that could have been imposed based upon such conviction pursuant to the laws of such foreign jurisdiction.
  4. To use its discretion as to the holding of an open hearing or an individual conference on any matter relevant to the granting of the application and the taking of testimony under oath.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-5. Powers and duties of the board.

  1. The board shall have the power to issue and establish criteria to determine eligibility for issuance of the certificate of recovery & re-entry;
  2. By an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the board to issue a certificate of recovery & re-entry to any person previously convicted of a crime in any jurisdiction;
  3. To create all applications, and certificates necessary for the purposes of this chapter upon forms prescribed by the board. Such forms relating to certificates of recovery & re-entry shall be distributed by the chairman of the board;
  4. To promulgate all necessary rules and regulations to carry out the intent of this chapter; and
  5. Any information contained within a certificate of recovery & re-entry as created in subsection (c) of this section shall be limited to:
    1. The applicant’s name;
    2. Date of birth;
    3. Certificate number;
    4. Issue date;
    5. A statement that “The board has determined that up to and including the issue date stated above, this individual has met the necessary standards of recovery & re-entry to hold the certificate”; and
    6. Authentication phone number for the department of corrections.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-6. Limitations and restrictions of certificate.

  1. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed:
    1. Destruction or sealing of criminal records pursuant to § 12-1-12 ; or
    2. Expungement of criminal records pursuant to §§ 12-1.3-1 through 4; or
    3. To alter or limit or affect the manner of applying for pardons to the Governor;
  2. The certificate shall not to be deemed to prevent:
    1. Any judicial proceeding, administrative, licensing or other body, or authority from relying upon the conviction specified in the certificate as the basis for the exercise of its discretionary power to suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew any license, permit, or other authority or privilege.
    2. Or limit the introduction of evidence of a prior conviction for purposes of impeachment of a witness in a judicial or other proceeding where otherwise authorized by the applicable rules of evidence.
    3. The enhancement from misdemeanor to felony when charging an individual with a criminal offense, subsequent to the conviction on which the certificate was issued, when a prior conviction mandates such enhancement of subsequent charges.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-7. Severability.

If any provision of this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

13-8.2-8. Immunity for third-party individuals — Civil and criminal.

An individual or entity that denies employment, professional licensing, housing or other benefits or opportunities to a holder of a certificate of recovery & re-entry on the basis of a criminal records check shall not be liable for civil damages or subject to any claim, demand, cause of action, or proceeding of any nature as a result of such denial.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 322, § 1; P.L. 2013, ch. 412, § 1.

Chapter 9 Out of State Parolee Supervision

13-9-1. Short title.

This chapter may be cited as the “Uniform Act for Out of State Parolee Supervision”.

History of Section. P.L. 1936, ch. 2381, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 618, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 13-9-1 .

Comparative Legislation.

Interstate supervision of parolees:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-132 et seq.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 127, § 151A et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Bail.

Where an alleged parole violator being held for extradition had challenges to the constitutionality of the Uniform Act before the court and injunctions had been issued preventing his extradition pending determination of the challenges, he was denied bail, subject to a detainer, until the questions he raised could be resolved. State v. Wilson, 121 R.I. 934 , 395 A.2d 1075, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 857 (1978).

13-9-2. Interstate compact.

The governor of this state is authorized and directed to enter into a compact on behalf of the state of Rhode Island with any of the United States legally joining in it in the form substantially as follows:

History of Section. P.L. 1936, ch. 2381, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 618, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-9-2 .

A COMPACT

Entered into by and among the contracting states, signatories to this compact, with the consent of the Congress of the United States of America, granted by an act entitled “An act granting the consent of Congress to any two (2) or more states to enter into agreements or compacts for co-operative effort and mutual assistance in the prevention of crime and for other purposes.”

The contracting states solemnly agree:

  1. That it shall be competent for the duly constituted judicial and administrative authorities of a state party to this compact, (herein called “sending state”) to permit any person convicted of an offense within such state and placed on probation or released on parole to reside in any other state party to this compact, (herein called “receiving state”) while on probation or parole, if
    1. The person is in fact a resident of or has his or her family residing within the receiving state and can obtain employment there;
    2. Though not a resident of the receiving state and not having his or her family residing there, the receiving state consents to the person being sent there.

      Before granting permission, opportunity shall be granted to the receiving state to investigate the home and prospective employment of the person.

      A “resident of the receiving state”, within the meaning of this section, is one who has been an actual continuous inhabitant of the state for more than one year prior to his or her coming to the sending state and has not resided within the sending state more than six (6) continuous months immediately preceding the commission of the offense for which he or she has been convicted.

  2. That each receiving state will assume the duties of visitation of and supervision over probationers or parolees of any sending state and in the exercise of those duties will be governed by the same standards that prevail for its own probationers and parolees.
  3. That duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any person on probation or parole. For that purpose no formalities will be required other than establishing the authority of the officer and the identity of the person to be retaken. All legal requirements to obtain extradition of fugitives from justice are expressly waived on the part of states party to this compact, as to persons to be apprehended or retaken. The decision of the sending state to retake a person on probation or parole shall be conclusive upon and not reviewable within the receiving state; provided, that if, at the time when a state seeks to retake a probationer or parolee, there should be pending against him or her within the receiving state any criminal charge, or he or she should be suspected of having committed within that state a criminal offense, he or she shall not be retaken without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or from imprisonment for the offense.
  4. That the duly accredited officers of the sending state will be permitted to transport prisoners being retaken through any and all states parties to this compact, without interference.
  5. That the governor of each state may designate an officer who, acting jointly with like officers of other contracting states, if and when appointed, shall promulgate any rules and regulations that may be deemed necessary to more effectively carry out the terms of this compact.
  6. That this compact shall become operative immediately upon its ratification by any state as between it and any other ratifying state or states. When ratified it shall have the full force and effect of law within the state, the form of ratification to be in accordance with the laws of the ratifying state.
  7. That this compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon each ratifying state until renounced by it. The duties and obligations under this compact of a renouncing state shall continue as to parolees or probationers residing therein at the time of withdrawal until retaken or finally discharged by the sending state. Renunciation of this compact shall be by the same authority which ratified it, by sending six (6) months’ notice in writing of its intention to withdraw from the compact to the other states party to this agreement.

Compiler's Notes.

In 2021, “state of Rhode Island” was substituted for “state of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations” in the first paragraph of this section at the direction of the Law Revision Director to reflect the 2020 amendments to the state constitution that changed the state’s name.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Under a compact whereby the states of Massachusetts and Rhode Island granted to each other certain privileges including consent for the removal of parolees from one state to the other, each state reserving to itself the power to withhold consent where there is a charge pending against a parolee, such power was not reserved for the benefit of the parolee. Hanley v. Langlois, 93 R.I. 309 , 175 A.2d 182, 1961 R.I. LEXIS 109 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 1002, 82 S. Ct. 632, 7 L. Ed. 2d 540, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1938 (1962).

Final disposition of charges pending against parolee in this state was not a condition precedent to his removal to Massachusetts as a parole violator and the consent of this state to such removal did not constitute a waiver of this state’s jurisdiction to indict and prosecute such person on the charges pending against him. Hanley v. Langlois, 93 R.I. 309 , 175 A.2d 182, 1961 R.I. LEXIS 109 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 1002, 82 S. Ct. 632, 7 L. Ed. 2d 540, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1938 (1962).

13-9-3. Severability.

If any section, sentence, subdivision, or clause of this chapter is for any reason held invalid or to be unconstitutional, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1936, ch. 2381, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 618, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-9-3 .

13-9-4. “State” defined.

“State”, as used in this chapter, means any one of the several states and the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia.

History of Section. R.P.L. 1957, ch. 61, § 1.

13-9-5. Additional jurisdictions as parties to compact.

It is recognized and further declared that, pursuant to the consent and authorization contained in 4 U.S.C. § 112, this state shall be a party to the Interstate Compact for the Supervision of Parolees and Probationers with any additional jurisdiction legally joining in the compact when that jurisdiction shall have enacted the compact in accordance with its terms.

History of Section. R.P.L. 1957, ch. 61, § 2.

Chapter 9.1 Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision

13-9.1-1. Short title.

This chapter may be cited as the “Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision.”

History of Section. P.L. 2002, ch. 185, § 1.

13-9.1-1.2. Findings.

The general assembly has found and hereby declares that:

  1. The interstate compact for the supervision of parolees and probationers was established in 1937, it is the earliest corrections “compact” established among the states and has not been amended since its adoption over sixty-two (62) years ago;
  2. This compact is the only vehicle for the controlled movement of adult parolees and probationers across state lines, and it currently has jurisdiction over more than a quarter of a million (250,000) offenders;
  3. The complexities of the compact have become more difficult to administer, and many jurisdictions have expanded supervision expectations to include currently unregulated practices such as victim input, victim notification requirements and sex offender registration;
  4. After hearings, national surveys, and a detailed study by a task force appointed by the national institute of corrections, the overwhelming recommendation has been to amend the document to bring about an effective management capacity that addresses public safety concerns and offender accountability;
  5. Upon the adoption of this interstate compact for adult offender supervision, it is the intention of the legislature to repeal the previous interstate compact for the supervision of parolees and probationers on the effective date of this compact.

History of Section. P.L. 2002, ch. 185, § 1.

13-9.1-1.3. The interstate compact for adult offender supervision.

The interstate compact for adult offender supervision is hereby enacted into law and entered into by this state on its behalf with all jurisdictions legally joining in substantially the following form:

ARTICLE 1

PURPOSE

The compacting states to this interstate compact recognize the each state is responsible for the supervision of adult offenders in the community who are authorized pursuant to the bylaws and rules of this compact to travel across state lines both to and from each compacting state in such a manner as to track the location of offenders, transfer supervision authority in an orderly and efficient manner, and when necessary return offenders to the originating jurisdictions. The compacting states also recognize that congress, by enacting the crime control act, 4 U.S.C. section 112 (1965), has authorized and encouraged compacts for cooperative efforts and mutual assistance in the prevention of crime. It is the purpose of this compact and the interstate commission created hereunder, through means of joint and cooperative action among the compacting states: to provide the framework for the promotion of public safety and protect the rights of victims through the control and regulation of the interstate movement of offenders in the community; to provide for the effective tracking, supervision, and rehabilitation of these offenders by the sending and receiving states; and to equitably distribute the costs, benefits and obligations of the compact among the compacting states. In addition, this compact will: create a interstate commission which will establish uniform procedures to manage the movement between states of adults placed under community supervision and released to the community under the jurisdiction of courts, paroling authorities, corrections or other criminal justice agencies which will promulgate rules to achieve the purpose of this compact; ensure an opportunity for input and timely notice to victims and to jurisdictions where defined offenders are authorized to travel or to relocate across state lines; establish a system of uniform data collection, access to information on active cases by authorized criminal justice officials, and regular reporting of compact activities to heads of state councils, state executive, judicial, and legislative branches and criminal justice administrators; monitor compliance with rules governing interstate movement of offenders and initiate interventions to address and correct non-compliance; and coordinate training and education regarding regulations of interstate movement of offenders for officials involved in such activity. The compacting states recognize that there is no “right” of any offender to live in another state and that duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any offender under supervision subject to the provisions of this compact and bylaws and rules promulgated hereunder. It is the policy of the compacting states that the activities conducted by the interstate commission created herein are the formation of public policies and are therefore public business.

ARTICLE II

DEFINITIONS

As used in this compact, unless the context clearly requires a different construction:

“Adult” means both individuals legally classified as adults and juveniles treated as adults by court order, statute, or operation of law.

“Bylaws” mean those bylaws established by the interstate commission for its governess, or for directing or controlling the interstate commission’s actions or conduct.

“Compact Administrator” means the individual in each compacting state appointed pursuant to the terms of this compact responsible for the administration and management of the state’s supervision and transfer of offenders subject to the terms of this compact, the rules adopted by the interstate commission and policies adopted by the state council under this compact.

“Compacting state” means any state which has enacted the enabling legislation for this compact.

“Commissioner” means the voting representative of each compacting state appointed pursuant to Article III of this compact.

“Interstate Commission” means the interstate commission for adult offender supervision established by this compact.

“Member” means the commissioner of a compacting state or designee; who shall be a person officially connected with the commissioner.

“Non-compacting state” means any state which has not enacted the enabling legislation for this compact.

“Offender” means an adult placed under, or subject, to supervision as the result of the commission of a criminal offense and released to the community under the jurisdiction of courts, paroling authorities, corrections, or other criminal justice agencies.

“Person” means any individual, corporation, business enterprise, or other legal entity, either public or private.

“Rules” means acts of the interstate commission, duly promulgated pursuant to Article VIII of this compact, substantially affecting interested parties in addition to the interstate commission, which shall have the force and effect of law in the compacting states.

“State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia and any other territorial possessions of the United States.

“State Council” means the resident members of the state council for interstate adult offender supervision created by each state under Article III of this compact.

ARTICLE III

THE COMPACT COMMISSION

The compacting states hereby create the “Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervisions.” The interstate commission shall be a body corporate and joint agency of the compacting states. The interstate commission shall have all the responsibilities, powers and duties set forth herein, including the power to sue and be sued, and such additional powers as may be conferred upon it by subsequent action of the respective legislatures of the compacting states in accordance with the terms of this compact.

The interstate commission shall consist of commissioners selected and appointed by resident members of a state council for interstate adult offender supervision for each state.

In addition to the commissioners who are the voting representatives of each state, the interstate commission shall include individuals who are not commissioners but who are members of interested organizations; such non-commissioner members must include a member of the national organizations of governors, legislators, state chief justices, attorney general and crime victims. All non-commissioner members of the interstate commission shall be ex-officio (nonvoting) members. The interstate commission may provide in its bylaws for such additional, ex-officio, non-voting members as it deems necessary.

Each compacting state represented at any meeting of the interstate commission is entitled to one vote. A majority of the compacting states shall constitute a quorum for the transaction business, unless a larger quorum is required by the bylaws of the interstate commission. The interstate commission shall meet at least once each calendar year. The chairperson may call additional meetings and, upon the request of twenty-seven (27) or more compacting states, shall call additional meetings. Public notice shall be given of all meetings and meetings shall be open to the public. The interstate commission shall establish and executive committee which shall include commission officers, members and others as shall be determined by the bylaws. The executive committee shall have the power to act on behalf of the interstate commission during periods when the interstate commission is not in session, with the exception of rulemaking and/or amendment to the compact. The executive committee oversees the day-to-day activities managed by the executive director and interstate commission staff, administers enforcement and compliance with the provisions of the compact, its bylaws and as directed by the interstate commission and performs other duties as directed by commission or set forth in the bylaws.

ARTICLE IV

THE STATE COUNCIL

Each member state shall create a state council for interstate adult offender supervision which shall be responsible for the appointment of the commissioner who shall serve on the interstate commission from that state. Each state council shall appoint as its commissioner the compact administrator from that state to serve on the interstate commission in such capacity under or pursuant to applicable law of the member state. While each member state may determine the membership of its own state council, its membership must include at least one representative from the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government, victims groups and the Rhode Island compact administrator. Each compacting state retains the right to determine the qualifications of the compact administrator who shall be appointed by the governor in consultation with the legislature and the judiciary. In addition to appointment of its commissioner to the national interstate commission, each state council shall exercise oversight and advocacy concerning its participation in interstate commission activities and other duties as may be determined by each member state including, but not limited to, development of policy concerning operations and procedures of the compact within that state.

ARTICLE V

POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION

The interstate commission shall have the following powers:

  1. To adopt a seal and suitable bylaws governing the management and operation of the interstate commission;
  2. To promulgate rules which shall have the force and effect of statutory law and shall be binding in the compacting states to the extent and in the manner provided in this compact;
  3. To oversee, supervise and coordinate the interstate movement of offenders subject to the terms of this compact and any bylaws adopted and rules promulgated by the compact commission.
  4. To enforce compliance with compact provisions, interstate commission rules, and bylaws, using all necessary and proper means, including, but not limited to, the use of judicial process.
  5. To establish and maintain offices;
  6. To purchase and maintain insurance and bonds;
  7. To borrow, accept, or contract for services of personnel, including, but not limited to, members and their staffs;
  8. To establish and appoint committees and hire staff which it deems necessary for the carrying out of its functions including, but not limited to, an executive committee as required by Article III which shall have the power to act on behalf of the interstate commission in carrying out its powers and duties hereunder;
  9. To elect or appoint such officers, attorneys, employees, agents, or consultants, and to fix their compensation, define their duties and determine their qualifications; and to establish the interstate commission’s personnel policies and programs relating to, among other things, conflicts of interest, rates of compensation, and qualifications of personnel;
  10. To accept any and all donations and grants of money, equipment, supplies, materials, and services, and to receive, utilize, and dispose of same;
  11. To lease, purchase accept contributions or donations of , or otherwise to own, hold, improve or use any property, real, personal, or mixed;
  12. To sell, convey, mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, abandon, or otherwise dispose of any property, real, personal or mixed;
  13. To establish a budget and make expenditures and levy dues as provided in Article X of this compact;
  14. To sue and be sued;
  15. To provide for dispute resolution among compacting states;
  16. To perform such functions as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this compact;
  17. To report annually to the legislatures, governors, judiciary, and state councils of the compacting states concerning the activities of the interstate commission during the preceding year. Such reports shall also include any recommendations that may have been adopted by the interstate commission;
  18. To coordinate education, training and public awareness regarding the interstate movement of offenders for officials involved in such activity;
  19. To establish uniform standards for the reporting, collecting, and exchanging of data.

ARTICLE VI

ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION

Section A. Bylaws

The interstate commission shall, by a majority of the members, within twelve (12) months of the first interstate commission meeting, adopt bylaws to govern its conduct as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the compact, including, but not limited to: establishing the fiscal year of the interstate commission; establishing and executive committee and such other committees as may be necessary. Providing reasonable standards and procedures: (i) for the establishment of committees; and (ii) governing any general or specific delegation of any authority or function of the interstate commission; providing reasonable procedures for calling and conducting meetings of the interstate commission, and ensuring reasonable notice of each such meeting; establishing the titles and responsibilities of the officers of the interstate commission; providing reasonable standards and procedures for the establishment of the personnel policies and programs of the interstate commission. Notwithstanding any civil service or other similar laws of any compacting state, the bylaws shall exclusively govern the personnel policies and programs of the interstate commission; and providing a mechanism for winding up the operations of the interstate commission and the equitable return of any surplus funds that may exist upon the termination of the compact after the payment and/or reserving of all of its debts and obligations; providing transition rules for “start up” administration of the compact; establishing standards and procedures for compliance and technical assistance in carrying out the compact.

Section B. Officers and staff

The interstate commission shall, by a majority of the members, elect from among its members a chairperson and a vice chairperson, each of whom shall have such authorities and duties as may be specified in the bylaws. The chairperson or, in his or her absence or disability, the vice chairperson, shall preside at all meetings of the interstate commission. The officers so elected shall serve without compensation or remuneration from the interstate commission; provided, that subject to the availability of budgeted funds, the officers shall be reimbursed for any actual and necessary costs and expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties and responsibilities as officers of the interstate commission. The interstate commission shall, through its executive committee, appoint or retain an executive director for such period, upon such terms and conditions and for such compensation as the interstate commission may deem appropriate. The executive director shall serve as secretary to the interstate commission, and hire and supervise such other staff as may be authorized by the interstate commission, but shall not be a member.

Section C. Corporate records of the interstate commission

The interstate commission shall maintain its corporate books and records in accordance with the bylaws.

Section D. Qualified immunity, defense and indemnification

The members, officers, executive director and employees of the interstate commission shall be immune from suit and liability, either personally or in their official capacity, for any claim for damage to or loss of property or personal injury or other civil liability caused or arising out of any actual or alleged act, error or omission that occurred within the scope of interstate commission employment, duties or responsibilities; provided, that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to protect any such person from suit and/or liability for any damage, loss, injury or liability caused by the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of any such person. The interstate commission shall defend the commissioner of a compacting state, or his or her representatives or employees, or the interstate commission’s representatives or employees, in any civil action seeking to impose liability, arising out of any actual or alleged act, error or omission that occurred with the scope of interstate commission employment, duties or responsibilities, or that the defendant had a reasonable basis for believing occurred within the scope of interstate commission employment, duties or responsibilities; provided, that the actual or alleged act, error or omission did not result from intentional wrongdoing on the part of such person.

The interstate commission shall indemnify and hold the commissioner of a compacting state, the appointed designee or employees, or the interstate commission’s representatives or employees, harmless in the amount of any settlement or judgment obtained against such persons arising out of any actual or alleged act, error or omission that occurred within the scope of interstate commission employment, duties or responsibilities, or that such persons had a reasonable basis for believing occurred within the scope of interstate commission employment, duties or responsibilities; provided, that the actual or alleged act, error or omission did not result from gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing on the part of such person.

ARTICLE VII

ACTIVITIES OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION

The interstate commission shall meet and take such actions as are consistent with the provisions of this compact. Except as otherwise provided in this compact and unless a greater percentage is required by the bylaws, in order to constitute an act of the interstate commission, such act shall have been taken at a meeting of the interstate commission and shall have received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present. Each member of the interstate commission shall have the right and power to cast a vote to which that compacting state is entitled and to participate in the business and affairs of the interstate commission. A member shall vote in person on behalf of the state and shall not delegate a vote to another member state. However, a state council shall appoint another authorized representative, in the absence of the commissioner from that state, to cast a vote on behalf of the member state at a specified meeting. The bylaws may provide for members participation in meetings by telephone or other means of telecommunication or electronic communication. Any voting conducted by telephone, or other means of telecommunication or electronic communication shall be subject to the same quorum requirements of meetings where members are present in person. The interstate commission shall meet at least once during each calendar year. The chairperson of the interstate commission may call additional meetings at any time and, upon the request of a majority of the members, shall call additional meetings.

The interstate commission’s bylaws shall establish conditions and procedures under which the interstate commission shall make its information and official records available to the public for inspection or copying. The interstate commission may exempt from disclosure any information or official records to the extent they would adversely affect personal privacy rights or proprietary interests. In promulgating such rules, the interstate commission may make available to law enforcement agencies records and information otherwise exempt from disclosure, and may enter into agreements with law enforcement agencies to receive or exchange information or records subject to nondisclosure and confidentiality provisions.

Public notice shall be given of all meetings and all meetings shall be open to the public, except as set forth in the rules or as otherwise provided in the compact. The interstate commission shall promulgate rules consistent with the principles contained in the “Government in Sunshine Act,” 5 U.S.C. section 552(b), as may be amended. The interstate commission and any of its committees may close a meeting to the public where it determines by two-thirds (2/3) vote that an open meeting would be likely to:

  1. Relate solely to the interstate commission’s internal personnel practices and procedures;
  2. Disclose matters specifically exempted from disclosure by statute;
  3. Disclosure trade secrets or commercial or financial information which is privileged or confidential;
  4. Involve accusing any person of a crime, or formally censuring any person;
  5. Disclose information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
  6. Disclose investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes;
  7. Disclose information contained in or related to examination, operating or condition reports prepared by, or on behalf of or for the use of, the interstate commission with respect to a regulated entity for the purpose of regulation or supervision of such entity;
  8. Disclose information, the premature disclosure of which would significantly endanger the life of a person or the stability of a regulated entity;
  9. Specifically relate to the interstate commission’s issuance of a subpoena, or its participation in a civil action or proceeding. For every meeting closed pursuant to this provision, the interstate commission’s chief legal officer shall publicly certify that, in his or her opinion, the meeting may be closed to the public, and shall reference each relevant exemptive provision. The interstate commission shall keep minutes which shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed in any meeting and shall provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons therefor, including a description of each of the views expressed on any item and the record of any rollcall vote (reflected in the vote of each member on the question). All documents considered in connection with any action shall be identified in such minutes.

    The interstate commission shall collect standardized data concerning the interstate movement of offenders as directed through its bylaws and rules which specify the data to be collected, the means of collection and data exchange and reporting requirements.

ARTICLE VIII

RULEMAKING FUNCTIONS OF THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION

The interstate commission shall promulgate rules in order to effectively and efficiently achieve the purposes of the compact including transition rules governing administration of the compact during the period in which it is being considered and enacted by the states.

Rulemaking shall occur pursuant to the criteria set forth in this article and the bylaws and rules adopted pursuant thereto. Such rulemaking shall substantially conform to the principles of the federal administrative procedure act, 5 U.S.C.S. section 551 et seq., and the federal advisory committee act, 5 U.S.C.S. app. 2, section 1 et seq., as may be amended (hereinafter “APA”).

All rules and amendments shall become binding as of the date specified in each rule or amendment.

If a majority of the legislatures of the compacting states rejects a rule, by enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to adopt the compact, then such rule shall have no further force and effect in any compacting state.

When promulgating a rule, the interstate commission shall:

  1. publish the proposed rule stating with particularity the text of the rule which is proposed and the reason for the proposed rule;
  2. allow persons to submit written data, facts, opinions and arguments, which information shall be publicly available;
  3. provide an opportunity for an informal hearing; and
  4. promulgate a final rule and its effective date, if appropriate, based on the rulemaking record.

    Not later than sixty (60) days after a rule is promulgated, any interested person may file a petition in the United States district court for the District of Columbia or in the federal district court where the interstate commission’s principal office is located for judicial review of such rule. If the court finds that the interstate commission’s action is not supported by substantial evidence, (as defined in the APA), in the rulemaking record, the court shall hold the rule unlawful and set it aside.

    Subjects to be addressed within twelve (12) months after the first meeting must at a minimum include:

  1. Notice to victims and opportunity to be heard;
  2. Offender registration and compliance;
  3. Violations/returns;
  4. Transfer procedures and forms;
  5. Eligibility for transfer;
  6. Collection of restitution and fees from offenders;
  7. Data collection and reporting;
  8. The level of supervision to be provided by the receiving state;
  9. Transition rules governing the operation of the compact and the interstate commission during all or part of the period between the effective date of the compact and the date on which the last eligible state adopts the compact;
  10. Mediation, arbitration and dispute resolution.

    The existing rules governing the operation of the previous compact superceded by this act shall be null and void twelve (12) months after the first meeting of the interstate commission created hereunder.

    Upon determination by the interstate commission that an emergency exists, it may promulgate an emergency rule which shall become effective immediately upon adoption, provided that the usual rulemaking procedures provided hereunder shall be retroactively applied to said rule as soon as reasonably possible, in no event later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of the rule.

ARTICLE IX

OVERSIGHT, ENFORCEMENT, AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION

Section A. Oversight. The interstate commission shall oversee the interstate movement of adult offenders in the compacting states and shall monitor such activities being administered in noncompacting states which may significantly affect compacting states.

The courts and executive agencies in each compacting state shall enforce this compact and shall take all actions necessary and appropriate to effectuate the compact’s purposes and intent. In any judicial or administrative proceeding in a compacting state pertaining to the subject matter of this compact which may affect the powers, responsibilities or actions of the interstate commission, the interstate commission shall be entitled to receive all service of process in any such proceeding, and shall have standing to intervene in the proceeding for all purposes.

Section B. Dispute resolution. The compacting states shall report to the interstate commission on issues or activities of concern to them, and cooperate with and support the interstate commission in the discharge of its duties and responsibilities.

The interstate commission shall attempt to resolve any disputes or other issues which are subject to the compact and which may arise among compacting states or noncompacting states.

The interstate commission shall enact a bylaw or promulgate a rule providing for both mediation and binding dispute resolution for disputes among the compacting states.

Section C. Enforcement. The interstate commission, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, shall enforce the provisions of this compact using any or all means set forth in Article XII, Section B of this compact.

ARTICLE X

FINANCE

The interstate commission shall pay or provide for the payment of the reasonable expenses of its establishment, organization and ongoing activities.

The interstate commission shall levy on and collect an annual assessment from each compacting state to cover the cost of the internal operations and activities of the interstate commission and its staff which must be in a total amount sufficient to cover the interstate commission’s annual budget as approved each year. The aggregate annual assessment amount shall be allocated based upon a formula to be determined by the interstate commission, taking into consideration the population of the state and the volume of interstate movement of offenders in each compacting states and shall promulgate a rule binding upon all compacting states which governs said assessment.

The interstate commission shall not incur any obligations of any kind prior to securing the funds adequate to meet the same; nor shall the interstate commission pledge the credit of any of the compacting state, except by and with the authority of the compacting state.

The interstate commission shall keep accurate accounts of all receipts and disbursements. The receipts and disbursements of the interstate commission shall be subject to the audit and accounting procedures established under its bylaws. However, all receipts and disbursements of funds handled by the interstate commission shall be audited yearly by a certified or licensed public accountant and the report of the audit shall be included in and become part of the annual report of the interstate commission.

ARTICLE XI

COMPACTING STATES, EFFECTIVE DATE AND AMENDMENT

Any state, as defined in Article II of this compact, is eligible to become a compacting state.

The compact shall become effective and binding upon legislative enactment of the compact into law by no less than thirty-five (35) of the states. The initial effective date shall be the latter of July 1, 2001, or upon enactment into law by the 35th jurisdiction. Thereafter it shall become effective and binding, as to any other compacting state, upon enactment of the compact into law by that state. The governors of nonmember states or their designees will be invited to participate in interstate commission activities on a nonvoting basis prior to adoption of the compact by all states and territories of the United States.

Amendments to the compact may be proposed by the interstate commission for enactment by the compacting states. No amendment shall become effective and binding upon the interstate commission and the compacting states unless and until it is enacted into law by unanimous consent of the compacting states.

ARTICLE XII

WITHDRAWAL, DEFAULT, TERMINATION, AND JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT

Section A. Withdrawal

Once effective, the compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon each and every compacting state; provided, that a compacting state may withdraw from the compact (“withdrawing state”) by enacting a statute specifically repealing the statute which enacted the compact into law.

The effective date of withdrawal is the effective date of the repeal.

The withdrawing state shall immediately notify the chairperson of the interstate commission in writing upon the introduction of legislation repealing this compact in the withdrawing state.

The interstate commission shall notify the other compacting states of the withdrawing state’s intent to withdraw within sixty (60) days of its receipt thereof.

The withdrawing state is responsible for all assessments, obligations and liabilities incurred through the effective date of withdrawal, including any obligations, the performance of which extend beyond the effective date of withdrawal.

Reinstatement following withdrawal of any compacting state shall occur upon the withdrawing state reenacting the compact or upon such later date as determined by the interstate commission.

Section B. Default

If the interstate commission determines that any compacting state has at any time defaulted (“defaulting state”) in the performance of any of its obligations or responsibilities under this compact, the bylaws or any duly promulgated rules the interstate commission may impose any or all of the following penalties:

Fines, fees and costs in such amounts as are deemed to be reasonable as fixed by the interstate commission;

Remedial training and technical assistance as directed by the interstate commission;

Suspension and termination of membership in the compact. Suspension shall be imposed only after all other reasonable means of securing compliance under the bylaws and rules have been exhausted. Immediate notice of suspension shall be given by the interstate commission to the governor, chief justice or chief judicial officer of the state; the majority and minority leaders of the defaulting state’s legislature, and the state council. The grounds for default include, but are not limited to, failure of a compacting state to perform such obligations or responsibilities imposed upon it by this compact, interstate commission bylaws, or duly promulgated rules. The interstate commission shall immediately notify the defaulting state in writing of the penalty imposed by the interstate commission on the defaulting state pending a cure of the default. The interstate commission shall stipulate the conditions and the time period within which the defaulting state must cure its default. If the defaulting state fails to cure the default within the time period specified by the interstate commission, in addition to any other penalties imposed herein, the defaulting state may be terminated from the compact upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the compacting states and all rights, privileges and benefits conferred by this compact shall be terminated from the effective date of suspension.

Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of termination of a defaulting state, the interstate commission shall notify the governor, the chief justice or chief judicial officer and the majority and minority leaders of the defaulting state’s legislature and the state council of such termination.

The defaulting state is responsible for all assessments, obligations and liabilities incurred through the effective date of termination including any obligations, the performance of which extends beyond the effective date of termination.

The interstate commission shall not bear any costs relating to the defaulting state unless otherwise mutually agreed upon between the interstate commission and the defaulting state.

Reinstatement following termination of any compacting state requires both a reenactment of the compact by the defaulting state and the approval of the interstate commission pursuant to the rules.

Section C. Judicial enforcement

The interstate commission may, by majority vote of the members, initiate legal action in the United States district court for the District of Columbia or, at the discretion of the interstate commission, in the Federal district where the interstate commission has its offices to enforce compliance with the provisions of the compact, its duly promulgated rules and bylaws, against any compacting state in default. In the event judicial enforcement is necessary the prevailing party shall be awarded all costs of such litigation including reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Section D. Dissolution of compact

The compact dissolves effective upon the date of the withdrawal or default of the compacting state which reduces membership in the compact to one (1) compacting state.

Upon the dissolution of this compact, the compact becomes null and void and shall be of no further force or effect, and the business and affairs of the interstate commission shall be wound up and any surplus funds shall be distributed in accordance with the bylaws.

ARTICLE XIII

SEVERABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION

The provisions of this compact shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence or provision is deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the compact shall be enforceable.

The provisions of this compact shall be liberally constructed to effectuate its purposes.

ARTICLE XIV

BINDING EFFECT OF COMPACT AND OTHER LAWS

Section A. Other laws

Nothing herein prevents the enforcement of any other law of a compacting state that is not inconsistent with this compact.

All compacting states’ laws conflicting with this compact are superseded to the extent of the conflict.

Section B. Binding effect of the compact

All lawful actions of the interstate commission, including all rules and bylaws promulgated by the interstate commission, are binding upon the compacting states.

All agreements between the interstate commission and the compacting states are binding in accordance with their terms.

Upon the request of a party to a conflict over meaning or interpretation of interstate commission actions, and upon a majority vote of the compacting states, the interstate commission may issue advisory opinions regarding such meaning or interpretation.

In the event any provision of this compact exceeds the constitutional limits imposed on the legislature of any compacting state, the obligations, duties, powers or jurisdiction sought to be conferred by such provision upon the interstate commission shall be ineffective and such obligations, duties, powers or jurisdiction shall remain in the compacting state and shall be exercised by the agency thereof to which such obligations, duties, powers or jurisdiction are delegated by law in effect at the time this compact becomes effective.

History of Section. P.L. 2002, ch. 185, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

As enacted, this section was designated as § 13-9.1-1-3. The section was redesignated as § 13-9.1-1.3 by the director of law revision of the joint committee on legislative services pursuant to § 43-2-2.1 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Condition Imposed by Receiving State.

Interstate Compact on Adult Offender Supervision (ICAOS), ICAOS Rules, Rule 4.103-1 (Rule) did not require a Rhode Island trial justice to find a violation of a probation condition imposed by Pennsylvania as a receiving state because the Rule only required Rhode Island’s probation authority to initiate revocation proceedings. State v. Brown, 140 A.3d 768, 2016 R.I. LEXIS 103 (R.I. 2016).

Chapter 10 Pardons

13-10-1. Presentation of petitions.

Petitions for pardon under R.I. Const., Art. IX, Sec. XIII , shall be presented to the governor, and the petitioners shall comply with any rules and regulations respecting their filing and hearing that he or she may from time to time prescribe.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 15, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 21, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 20, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 6, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 13-10-1 .

Compiler’s Notes.

This section is set out to correct an error appearing in the bound volume.

Cross References.

Reprieves by governor, R.I. Const., Art. IX, § 4 .

Collateral References.

Consent of convict as essential to a pardon, commutation or reprieve. 52 A.L.R. 835.

Formal requisites of pardon. 34 A.L.R. 212.

Judicial investigation of pardon by governor. 101 A.L.R.6th 431.

Power to pardon or commute sentence as one which devolves upon the lieutenant governor during the absence or disability of the governor. 32 A.L.R. 1162.

Sufficiency of description of offense in pardon. 35 A.L.R.2d 1263.

13-10-2. Compliance with terms and conditions.

In the exercise of the power of pardon, the person who receives the benefit of a pardon shall comply with, and be subject to, any terms and conditions that may be imposed by the governor at the time of the exercise of that power.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 15, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 21, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 20, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 6, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 13-10-2 .

Collateral References.

Attorney, pardon as preventing or nullifying disbarment. 143 A.L.R. 172, 70 A.L.R.2d 268.

Conditional pardon. 60 A.L.R. 1410.

Fine or penalty imposed in addition to imprisonment, pardon or parole as affecting. 74 A.L.R. 1118.

Fine or penalty, recovery of, after pardon. 26 A.L.R. 1536.

Judicial investigation of pardon by governor. 101 A.L.R.6th 431.

License of physician, surgeon or dentist, pardon as defense to proceeding for suspension or cancelation. 126 A.L.R. 257.

Offense and convictions covered by pardon. 35 A.L.R.2d 1261.

Officer, pardon as preventing or nullifying removal. 143 A.L.R. 172, 70 A.L.R.2d 268.

Pardon as affecting consideration of earlier conviction in applying habitual criminal statute. 31 A.L.R.2d 1186.

Pardon as defense to disbarment of attorney. 59 A.L.R.3d 466.

Pardon as restoring public office or license or eligibility therefore. 58 A.L.R.3d 1191.

Public office, pardon as restoring eligibility to. 58 A.L.R.3d 1191.

Right to notice and hearing before revocation of conditional pardon. 29 A.L.R.2d 1074, 44 A.L.R.3d 306.

Chapter 11 Interstate Corrections

13-11-1. Short title.

This chapter may be cited as the “New England Interstate Corrections Compact”.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 90, § 1.

Comparative Legislation.

New England Interstate Corrections Compact:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 18-102 et seq.

Mass. Ann. Laws Spec. L. § 113:1 et seq.

Collateral References.

Construction and Application of Interstate Corrections Compact and Implementing State Laws — Equivalency of Conditions and Rights and Responsibilities of Parties. 56 A.L.R.6th 553.

13-11-2. New England interstate corrections compact.

The New England interstate corrections compact is enacted into law and entered into by this state with any other of the hereinafter-mentioned states legally joining in the compact in the form substantially as follows:

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 90, § 2; P.L. 1999, ch. 83, § 17; P.L. 1999, ch. 130, § 17.

NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE CORRECTIONS COMPACT

ARTICLE I Purpose and Policy

The party states, desiring by common action to fully utilize and improve their institutional facilities and provide adequate programs for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of various types of offenders, declare that it is the policy of each of the party states to provide facilities and programs on a basis of cooperation with one another, serving the best interests of offenders and of society and effecting economies in capital expenditures and operational costs. The purpose of this compact is to provide for the mutual development and execution of programs of cooperation for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of offenders with the most economical use of human and material resources.

ARTICLE II Definitions

As used in this compact, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

  1. “State” means a state of the United States, located in New England, to wit, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island.
  2. “Sending state” means a state party to this compact in which conviction or court commitment was had.
  3. “Receiving state” means a state party to this compact to which an inmate is sent for confinement other than a state in which conviction or court commitment was had.
  4. “Inmate” means a male or female offender who is committed, under sentence to or confined in a penal or correctional institution.
  5. “Institution” means any penal or correctional facility (including but not limited to a facility for persons who are mentally ill or developmentally disabled) in which inmates as defined in (d) above may lawfully be confined.

ARTICLE III Contracts

  1. Each party state may make one or more contracts with any one or more of the other party states for the confinement of inmates on behalf of a sending state in institutions situated within receiving states. Any such contract shall provide for:
    1. Its duration
    2. Payments to be made to the receiving state by the sending state for inmate maintenance, extraordinary medical and dental expenses, and any participation in or receipt by inmates of rehabilitative or correctional services, facilities, programs or treatment not reasonably included as part of normal maintenance;
    3. Participation in programs of inmate employment, if any; the disposition or crediting of any payments received by inmates on account of employment; and the crediting of proceeds from or disposal of any products resulting from employment;
    4. Delivery and retaking of inmates; and
    5. Any other matters that may be necessary and appropriate to fix the obligations, responsibilities and rights of the sending and receiving states.
  2. Subject to legislative approval by the states concerned and prior to the construction or completion of construction of any institution or addition to any institution by a party state, any other party state or states may contract with that state for the enlargement of the planned capacity of the institution or addition to it, or for the inclusion in it of particular equipment or structures, and for the reservation of a specific percentum of the capacity of the institution to be kept available for use by inmates of the sending state or states so contracting. Any sending state so contracting may, to the extent that moneys are legally available, pay to the receiving state, a reasonable sum as consideration for the enlargement of capacity, or provision of equipment or structures, and reservation of capacity. The payment may be in a lump sum or in installments as provided in the contract.
  3. The terms and provisions of this compact shall be a part of any contract entered into by the authority of or pursuant to it, and nothing in any such contract shall be inconsistent with it.

ARTICLE IV Procedures and Rights

  1. Whenever the duly constituted authorities in a state party to this compact, and which has entered into a contract pursuant to article III, decides that confinement in, or transfer of an inmate to, an institution within the territory of another party state is necessary or desirable in order to provide adequate quarters and care or an appropriate program of rehabilitation or treatment, the officials may direct that the confinement be within an institution within the territory of the other party state, the receiving state to act in that regard solely as agent for the sending state.
  2. The appropriate officials of any state party to this compact shall have access, at all reasonable times, to any institution in which it has a contractual right to confine inmates for the purpose of inspecting the facilities and visiting any of its inmates who may be confined in the institution.
  3. Inmates confined in an institution pursuant to the terms of this compact shall at all times be subject to the jurisdiction of the sending state and may at any time be removed from it for transfer to a prison or other institution within the sending state, for transfer to another institution in which the sending state may have a contractual or other right to confine inmates, for release on probation or parole, for discharge, or for any other purpose permitted by the laws of the sending state; provided that the sending state shall continue to be obligated to any payments that may be required pursuant to the terms of any contract entered into under the terms of article III.
  4. Each receiving state shall provide regular reports to each sending state on the inmates of that sending state in institutions pursuant to this compact including a conduct record of each inmate and certify the record to the official designated by the sending state, in order that each inmate may have official review of his or her record in determining and altering the disposition of the inmate in accordance with the law which may obtain in the sending state and in order that the same may be a source of information for the sending state.
  5. All inmates who may be confined in an institution pursuant to the provisions of this compact shall be treated in a reasonable and humane manner and shall be treated equally with any similar inmates of the receiving state that may be confined in the same institution. The fact of confinement in a receiving state shall not deprive any inmate so confined of any legal rights which the inmate would have had if confined in an appropriate institution of the sending state.
  6. Any hearing or hearings to which an inmate confined pursuant to this compact may be entitled by the laws of the sending state may be had before the appropriate authorities of the sending state, or of the receiving state if authorized by the sending state. The receiving state shall provide adequate facilities for any hearings that may be conducted by the appropriate officials of a sending state. In the event that a hearing or hearings are held before officials of the receiving state, the governing law shall be that of the sending state and a record of the hearing or hearings as prescribed by the sending state shall be made. The record together with any recommendations of the hearing officials shall immediately be transmitted to the official or officials before whom the hearing would have been had if it had taken place in the sending state. In any and all proceedings held pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision, the officials of the receiving state shall act solely as agents of the sending state and no final determination shall be made in any matter except by the appropriate officials of the sending state.
  7. Any inmate confined pursuant to this compact shall be released within the territory of the sending state unless the inmate, and the sending and receiving states, agree upon release in some other place. The sending state shall bear the cost of the return to its territory.
  8. Any inmate confined pursuant to the terms of this compact shall have any and all rights to participate in and derive any benefits or incur or be relieved of any obligations or have such obligations modified or his status changed on account of any action or proceeding in which he could have participated if confined in any appropriate institution of the sending state located within the state.
    1. The parent, guardian, trustee, or other person or persons entitled under the laws of the sending state to act for, advise, or otherwise function with respect to any inmate shall not be deprived of or restricted in his exercise of any power in respect of any inmate confined pursuant to the terms of this compact.

ARTICLE V Acts Not Reviewable in Receiving State: Extradition

  1. Any decision of the sending state in respect of any matter over which it retains jurisdiction pursuant to this compact shall be conclusive upon and not reviewable within the receiving state, but if at the time the sending state seeks to remove an inmate from an institution in the receiving state there is pending against the inmate within such state any criminal charge or if the inmate is formally accused of having committed within such state a criminal offense, the inmate shall not be returned without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or other form of proceeding, imprisonment or detention for an offense. The duly accredited officers of the sending state shall be permitted to transport inmates pursuant to this compact through any and all states party to this compact without interference.
  2. An inmate who escapes from an institution in which he is confined pursuant to this compact shall be deemed a fugitive from the sending state and from the state in which the institution is situated. In the case of an escape to a jurisdiction other than the sending or receiving state, the responsibility for institution of extradition or rendition proceedings shall be that of the sending state, but nothing contained in this section shall be construed to prevent or affect the activities of officers and agencies of any jurisdiction directed toward the apprehension and return of an escapee.

ARTICLE VI Federal Aid

Any state party to this compact may accept federal aid for use in connection with any institution or program, the use of which is or may be affected by this compact or any contract pursuant to it and any inmate in a receiving state pursuant to this compact may participate in any federally aided program or activity for which the sending and receiving states have made contractual provision provided that if the program or activity is not part of the customary correctional regimen the express consent of the appropriate official of the sending state shall be required.

ARTICLE VII Entry into Force

This compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding upon the states so acting when it has been enacted into law by any two (2) states from among the states of New England. Thereafter, this compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding as to any other of said states upon similar action by the state.

ARTICLE VIII Withdrawal and Termination

This compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon a party state until it shall have enacted a statute repealing the compact and providing for the sending of formal written notice of withdrawal from the compact to the appropriate officials of all other party states. An actual withdrawal shall not take effect until one year after the notices provided in the statute have been sent. The withdrawal shall not relieve the withdrawing state from its obligations assumed under the compact prior to the effective date of withdrawal. Before the effective date of withdrawal, a withdrawing state shall remove to its territory, at its own expense, any inmates whom it may have confined pursuant to the provisions of this compact.

ARTICLE IX Other Arrangements Unaffected

Nothing contained in this compact shall be construed to abrogate or impair any agreement or other arrangement which a party state may have with a non-party state for the confinement, rehabilitation or treatment of inmates nor to repeal any other laws of a party state authorizing the making of cooperative institutional arrangements.

ARTICLE X Construction and Severability

The provisions of this compact shall be liberally construed and shall be severable. If any phrase, clause, sentence or provision of this compact is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any participating state or of the United States or the applicability of it to any government, agency, person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this compact and the applicability of it to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected. If this compact shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state participating in it, the compact shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all severable matters.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section is set out to correct an error appearing in the 2000 Reenactment volume.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Due Process Required.

Whatever the reason for the out of state transfers of inmates, the deprivation and the detrimental effects suffered by the transferred inmates required the imposition of due process protections. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457 (D.R.I. 1973), modified by 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 by 418 U.S. 909, 94 S. Ct. 3200, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1155, modified by 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910, 94 S. Ct. 3202, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1156 (1974).

Justification for Transfer.

In order to follow statutory intent, defendants had to make a determination that state facilities were inadequate and that the receiving institution had adequate and appropriate facilities before transfer of inmates; and defendants had to provide the receiving institution with a statement of why the state’s facilities were inadequate and what would be appropriate treatment and the reasons therefor when such a transfer was made. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457 (D.R.I. 1973), modified by 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 by 418 U.S. 909, 94 S. Ct. 3200, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1155, modified by 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910, 94 S. Ct. 3202, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1156 (1974).

“Legal Rights” of Transferees.

Where plaintiff prisoners were transferred from the Rhode Island Adult Corrections Institution to institutions outside the state, and this section in Art. IV (e) provides that confinement in the receiving state shall not deprive an inmate of any “legal rights” which he would have had if confined in an institution in the sending state, the Morris rules promulgated under the Administrative Procedures Act (§ 42-35-1 ), Morris v. Travisono, 310 F. Supp. 857 (D.R.I. 1970) as modified by Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 (1974), and constituting part of a consent decree entered by the court, have legal status and create “legal rights” within the meaning of this section, and plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory relief to that effect. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15382 (D.R.I.), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 490 F.2d 1209, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6221 (1st Cir. 1973).

Purpose of Transfer.

The state had interest in determining that transfers were not made as punishment for the valid exercise of constitutional or statutory rights of that class of its citizens who were incarcerated. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457 (D.R.I. 1973), modified by 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 by 418 U.S. 909, 94 S. Ct. 3200, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1155, modified by 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910, 94 S. Ct. 3202, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1156 (1974).

13-11-3. Powers of director of corrections.

The director of corrections is authorized and directed to do all things necessary or incidental to the carrying out of the compact in every particular. The director is further authorized to contract with any other states that shall be necessary in accordance with good prison policy to secure similar transfer agreements for the interstate transfer of prisoners.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 90, § 3; Reorg. Plan No. 1, 1970; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 10; P.L. 1979, ch. 70, § 1.

Chapter 12 Transfer of Prisoners to Federal Penitentiaries

13-12-1. Authority of attorney general.

The attorney general, when the director of corrections shall certify that proper and adequate treatment, facilities, and personnel are unavailable within this state, shall be authorized to contract with the proper officials (director of Bureau of the Prisons) of the United States for the custody, care, subsistence, education, treatment, and training of persons convicted of criminal offenses in the courts of this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 3, § 1; P.L. 1972, ch. 163, § 11.

Cross References.

Manner of obtaining information by board, § 13-8-22 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Due Process.

Whatever the reason for the out of state transfers of inmates, the deprivation and detrimental effects suffered by the transferred inmates required the imposition of due process. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457 (D.R.I. 1973), modified by 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 by 418 U.S. 909, 94 S. Ct. 3200, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1155, modified by 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910, 94 S. Ct. 3202, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1156 (1974).

No due process interest may be derived exclusively from the Rhode Island transfer statute. Gomes v. Moran, 468 F. Supp. 542, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14945 (D.R.I. 1979).

Justification for Transfer.

In order to follow statutory intent, defendants had to make a determination that state facilities were inadequate and that the receiving institution had adequate and appropriate facilities before transfer of inmates, and defendants had to provide the receiving institution with a statement of why the state’s facilities were inadequate and what would be appropriate treatment and the reasons therefor when such a transfer was made. Gomes v. Travisono, 353 F. Supp. 457 (D.R.I. 1973), modified by 490 F.2d 1209 (1st Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S. Ct. 2963, 41 L. Ed. 2d 935 by 418 U.S. 909, 94 S. Ct. 3200, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1155, modified by 510 F.2d 537 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910, 94 S. Ct. 3202, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1156 (1974).

13-12-2. Reimbursement by state.

Any contract entered into pursuant to § 13-12-1 shall provide for reimbursement to the United States in full for all costs or other expenses involved, or any other amount that may be agreed upon between the state and the United States.

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 3, § 1.

13-12-3. Treatment of prisoners.

Unless otherwise specifically provided in the contract, a person committed pursuant to § 13-12-1 shall be subject to all the provisions of law and regulations applicable to persons committed for violations of law of the United States not inconsistent with the sentence imposed.

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 3, § 1.

Collateral References.

Mandamus, under 28 USCS § 1361, to obtain change in prison condition or release of federal prisoner. 114 A.L.R. Fed. 225.

Chapter 13 Interstate Detainers

13-13-1. Short title.

This chapter may be cited as the “Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act”.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

Comparative Legislation.

Interstate Agreement on Detainers:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-186 et seq.

Mass. Ann. Laws Spec. L. § 115:1 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Construction.

As a congressionally sanctioned interstate compact, the interstate detainers statute is subject to construction under federal law. State v. Clifton, 777 A.2d 1272, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 136 (R.I. 2001).

Filing Detainers.

Although the state of Rhode Island was not required to file a detainer, its negligent failure to file the detainer denied the defendant his right to a timely trial. State v. DeAngelis, 658 A.2d 7, 1995 R.I. LEXIS 136 (R.I. 1995).

13-13-2. Interstate agreement on detainers.

The interstate agreement on detainers is enacted into law and entered into by this state on its own behalf with all jurisdictions legally joining in substantially the following form:

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

The contracting states solemnly agree that:

ARTICLE I

The party states find that charges outstanding against prisoner detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints and difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in other jurisdictions, produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. Accordingly, it is the policy of the party states and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of these charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints. The party states also find that proceedings with reference to these charges and detainers, when emanating from another jurisdiction, cannot properly be had in the absence of cooperative procedures. It is the further purpose of this agreement to provide cooperative procedures.

ARTICLE II

  1. “State” means a state of the United States; the United States of America; a territory or possession of the United States; the District of Columbia; the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
  2. “Sending state” means a state in which a prisoner is incarcerated at the time that he or she initiates a request for final disposition pursuant to article III of this agreement or at the time that a request for custody or availability is initiated pursuant to article IV.
  3. “Receiving state” means the state in which trial is to be had on an indictment, information or complaint pursuant to article III or article IV.

ARTICLE III

  1. Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he or she shall be brought to trial within one hundred eighty (180) days after he or she shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer’s jurisdiction written notice of the place of his or her imprisonment and his or her request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information or complaint; provided, that, for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his or her counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance. The request of the prisoner shall be accompanied by a certificate of the appropriate official having custody of the prisoner, stating the term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and any decision of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner.
  2. The written notice and request for final disposition referred to in paragraph (a) of this article shall be given or sent by the prisoner to the warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of him or her, who shall promptly forward it together with the certificate to the appropriate prosecuting official and court by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
  3. The warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of the prisoner shall promptly inform him or her of the source and contents of any detainer lodged against him or her and shall also inform him or her of his or her right to make a request for final disposition of the indictment, information, or complaint on which the detainer is based.
  4. Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to paragraph (a) of this article shall operate as a request for final disposition of all untried indictments, informations, or complaints on the basis of which detainers have been lodged against the prisoner from the state to whose prosecuting official the request for final disposition is specifically directed. The warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of the prisoner shall immediately notify all appropriate prosecuting officers and courts in the several jurisdictions within the state to which the prisoner’s request for final disposition is being sent of the proceeding being initiated by the prisoner. Any notification sent pursuant to this paragraph shall be accompanied by copies of the prisoner’s written notice, request, and the certificate. If trial is not had on any indictment, information or complaint contemplated by this article prior to the return of the prisoner to the original place of imprisonment, the indictment, information, or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.
  5. Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to paragraph (a) of this article shall also be deemed to be a waiver of extradition with respect to any charge or proceeding contemplated by it or included in it by reason of paragraph (d) of this article, and a waiver of extradition to the receiving state to serve any sentence there imposed upon him or her, after completion of his or her term of imprisonment in the sending state. The request for final disposition shall also constitute a consent by the prisoner to the production of his or her body in any court where his presence may be required in order to effectuate the purposes of this agreement and a further consent voluntarily to be returned to the original place of imprisonment in accordance with the provisions of this agreement. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the imposition of a concurrent sentence if otherwise permitted by law.
  6. Escape from custody by the prisoner subsequent to his or her execution of the request for final disposition referred to in paragraph (a) of this article shall void the request.

ARTICLE IV

  1. The appropriate officer of the jurisdiction in which an untried indictment, information, or complaint is pending shall be entitled to have a prisoner against whom he or she has lodged a detainer and who is serving a term of imprisonment in any party state made available in accordance with article V(a) of this agreement upon presentation of a written request for temporary custody or availability to the appropriate authorities of the state in which the prisoner is incarcerated: provided, that the court having jurisdiction of the indictment, information, or complaint shall have duly approved, recorded, and transmitted the request and provided further, that there shall be a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by the appropriate authorities before the request is honored, within which period the governor of the sending state may disapprove the request for temporary custody or availability, either upon his own motion or upon motion of the prisoner.
  2. Upon receipt of the officer’s written request as provided in paragraph (a), the appropriate authorities having the prisoner in custody shall furnish the officer with a certificate stating the term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and any decisions of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner. The authorities simultaneously shall furnish all other officers and appropriate courts in the receiving state who have lodged detainers against the prisoner with similar certificates and with notices informing them of the request for custody or availability and of the reasons for them.
  3. In respect of any proceeding made possible by this article, trial shall be commenced within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.
  4. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to deprive any prisoner of any right which he or she may have to contest the legality of his or her delivery as provided in paragraph (a), but such delivery may not be opposed or denied on the ground that the executive authority of the sending state has not affirmatively consented to or ordered the delivery.
  5. If trial is not had on any indictment, information, or complaint contemplated prior to the prisoner’s being returned to the original place of imprisonment pursuant to article V(e), such indictment, information, or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.

ARTICLE V

  1. In response to a request made under article III or article IV, the appropriate authority in a sending state shall offer to deliver temporary custody of the prisoner to the appropriate authority in the state where the indictment, information, or complaint is pending against the person in order that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had. If the request for final disposition is made by the prisoner, the offer of temporary custody shall accompany the written notice provided for in article III of this agreement. In the case of a federal prisoner, the appropriate authority in the receiving state shall be entitled to temporary custody as provided by this agreement or to the prisoner’s presence in federal custody at the place of trial, whichever custodial arrangement may be approved by the custodian.
  2. The officer or other representative of a state accepting an offer of temporary custody shall present the following upon demand:
    1. Proper identification and evidence of his or her authority to act for the state into whose temporary custody this prisoner is to be given.
    2. A duly certified copy of the indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged and on the basis of which the request for temporary custody of the prisoner has been made.
  3. If the appropriate authority shall refuse or fail to accept temporary custody of the person, or in the event that an action on the indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged is not brought to trial within the period provided in article III or article IV, the appropriate court of the jurisdiction where the indictment, information, or complaint has been pending shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice, and any detainer based on it shall cease to be of any force or effect.
  4. The temporary custody referred to in this agreement shall be only for the purpose of permitting prosecution on the charge or charges contained in one or more untried indictments, informations, or complaints which form the basis of the detainer or detainers or for prosecution on any other charge or charges arising out of the same transaction. Except for his or her attendance at court and while being transported to or from any place at which his or her presence may be required, the prisoner shall be held in a suitable jail or other facility regularly used for persons awaiting.
  5. At the earliest practicable time consonant with the purposes of this agreement, the prisoner shall be returned to the sending state.
  6. During the continuance of temporary custody or while the prisoner is otherwise being made available for trial as required by this agreement, time being served on the sentence shall continue to run but good time shall be earned by the prisoner only if, and to the extent that, the law and practice of the jurisdiction which imposed the sentence may allow.
  7. For all purposes other than that for which temporary custody as provided in this agreement is exercised, the prisoner shall be deemed to remain in the custody of and subject to the jurisdiction of the sending state and any escape from temporary custody may be dealt with in the same manner as an escape from the original place of imprisonment or in any other manner permitted by law.
  8. From the time that a party state receives custody of a prisoner pursuant to this agreement until the prisoner is returned to the territory and custody of the sending state, the state in which the one or more untried indictments, informations, or complaints are pending or in which trial is being had shall be responsible for the prisoner and shall also pay all costs of transporting, caring for, keeping, and returning the prisoner. The provisions of this paragraph shall govern unless the states concerned shall have entered into a supplementary agreement providing for a different allocation of costs and responsibilities as between or among themselves. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to alter or affect any internal relationship among the departments, agencies and officers of and in the government of a party state, or between a party state and its subdivisions, as to the payment of costs, or responsibilities for them.

ARTICLE VI

  1. In determining the duration and expiration dates of the time periods provided in articles III and IV of this agreement, the running of the time periods shall be tolled whenever and for as long as the prisoner is unable to stand trial, as determined by the court having jurisdiction of the matter.
  2. No provisions of this agreement, and no remedy made available by this agreement shall apply to any person who is adjudged to be mentally ill.

ARTICLE VII

Each state party to this agreement shall designate an officer who, acting jointly with like officers of other party states, shall promulgate rules and regulations to carry out more effectively the terms and provisions of this agreement, and who shall provide, within and without the state, information necessary to the effective operation of this agreement.

ARTICLE VIII

This agreement shall enter into full force and effect as to a party state when the state has enacted the agreement into law. A state party to this agreement may withdraw from it by enacting a statute repealing it. However, the withdrawal of any state shall not affect the status of any proceedings already initiated by inmates or by state officers at the time such withdrawal takes effect, nor shall it affect their rights in respect thereof.

ARTICLE IX

This agreement shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate its purposes. The provisions of this agreement shall be severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence, or provision of this agreement is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any party state or of the United States or its applicability to any government, agency, person, or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this agreement and its applicability to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected. If this agreement shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state party to it, the agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all severable matters.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section is set out to correct an error appearing in the 2000 Reenactment volume.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

The provisions of this agreement do not become operative until the receiving state lodges a detainer based on an indictment, information or complaint with the sending state. State v. Newman, 117 R.I. 354 , 367 A.2d 200, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1637 (1976).

The interstate agreement on detainers was not designed to protect against delays caused by actions of a defendant. State v. Shatney, 572 A.2d 872, 1990 R.I. LEXIS 75 (R.I. 1990).

Where defense counsel inadvertently misrepresented the length of defendant’s sentence under proposed plea agreement, and as a result, defendant filed a motion for continuance seeking time to find new counsel, the motion was properly denied, in part, because defendant’s time in Rhode Island, due to defendant’s extradition, was limited pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-2 . State v. Caprio, 819 A.2d 1265, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 82 (R.I. 2003).

Since proceedings could be transferred to another county, there was no absence of subject-matter jurisdiction on the part of the motion justice who heard the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-2 arguments and ruled on defendant’s contentions in respect to several cases. State v. Werner, 830 A.2d 1107, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 162 (R.I. 2003).

Collateral estoppel precluded review where defendant’s claim of violation of arts. III and IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers had been decided adversely to defendant in various earlier appeals. State v. Werner, 865 A.2d 1049, 2005 R.I. LEXIS 4 (R.I. 2005).

Article III.
— Federal Habeas Relief.

A delay in bringing the defendant to trial could not provide a basis for federal habeas relief since failure to comply with the time limits contained in this section was not of constitutional dimension. Lionberg v. Moran, 779 F. Supp. 672, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18800 (D.R.I. 1991).

— Speedy Trial.

Time begins to run on the 180 day period, within which trial must be brought, when the receiving state receives both the prisoner’s request for disposition and the certificate of inmate status from the sending state. State v. Moosey, 504 A.2d 1001, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 403 (R.I. 1986).

Defendant’s timeliness challenge under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) was properly rejected as six of the nine continuances granted were attributed to defendant and the IADA was not designed to protect against delays caused by a defendant’s actions. State v. Oliver, 68 A.3d 549, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 117 (R.I. 2013).

Defendant waived his timeliness challenge under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), since he did not object to the three continuances that were requested by the State and did not raise the IADA deadline during the nine continuance hearings. State v. Oliver, 68 A.3d 549, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 117 (R.I. 2013).

Defendant’s trial did not violate the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) because (1) the IAD did not apply after defendant’s federal sentence was served, and (2) defendant’s suppression motions caused any trial delay. State v. Tejeda, 171 A.3d 983, 2017 R.I. LEXIS 106 (R.I. 2017).

Article IV.
— Speedy Trial.

Where the state was ready to prosecute well within the 120 day period specified in Article IV and the delay of the trial beyond the period was caused by the defendant, the dictates of Article IV were met. State v. Moosey, 504 A.2d 1001, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 403 (R.I. 1986).

A defendant is not entitled to a dismissal on speedy trial grounds under this section where the attorney general’s department never receives the necessary forms even though the defendant has mailed them to the appropriate court. State v. Dufault, 540 A.2d 355, 1988 R.I. LEXIS 53 (R.I. 1988).

Trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss charges against him, pursuant to R.I. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 12 , based on an alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-2 , was properly denied where trials would have been commenced within the 180-day period except that continuances were required, which were found to be both necessary and reasonable, due to defendant’s demands to have new counsel appointed, to have the judge recused, and due to his uncooperativeness in returning to the State of Rhode Island; accordingly, denial of dismissal for violation of the Act and for an alleged violation of his right to a speedy trial, under R.I. Const. art. I, § 10 , was proper. State v. Werner, 831 A.2d 183, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 145 (R.I. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1123, 124 S. Ct. 1083, 157 L. Ed. 2d 921, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 356 (2004).

Computation of Time.

Because the interstate detainers statute does not contain its own provisions concerning the computation of time for the various deadlines it prescribes, the relevant state criminal rule applies. State v. Clifton, 777 A.2d 1272, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 136 (R.I. 2001).

Probation Violations.

Where defendant was extradited and, upon arriving in Rhode Island, was served with a probation violation notice, notice of the probation violation was not required, pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-2 , art. III(d), prior to extradition, as probation violations did not come under the purview of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-1 et seq. State v. Caprio, 819 A.2d 1265, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 82 (R.I. 2003).

Where defendant was extradited under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-1 et seq., and once in Rhode Island, defendant was served with a probation violation notice, the Rhode Island court had jurisdiction over defendant, as, although extradition under the act was not allowed for probation violation under R.I. Gen. Laws § 13-13-2 , art. III, charges independent of the probation violation led to defendant’s extradition. State v. Caprio, 819 A.2d 1265, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 82 (R.I. 2003).

13-13-3. “Appropriate court” defined.

“Appropriate court”, as used in § 13-13-2 , with reference to the courts of this state, means any court with criminal jurisdiction.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

13-13-4. Enforcement of compact.

All courts, departments, agencies, officers, and employees of this state and its political subdivisions are directed to enforce the Agreement on Detainers and to cooperate with one another and with other party states in enforcing the agreement and effectuating its purposes.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

13-13-5. Escape violation.

Escape from custody while in another state pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers shall constitute an offense against the laws of this state to the same extent and degree as an escape from the institution in which the prisoner was confined immediately prior to having been sent to another state pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement on Detainers and shall be punishable in the same manner as an escape from a state institution.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

13-13-6. Surrendering of inmate.

It shall be lawful and mandatory upon the warden or other official in charge of a penal or correctional institution in this state to give over the person of any inmate of the institution whenever so required by the operation of the Agreement on Detainers.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

13-13-7. Administrator — Designation.

The governor is authorized and empowered to designate an administrator who shall perform the duties and functions and exercise the powers conferred upon that person by § 13-13-2 .

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.

13-13-8. Request for custody — Notification of prisoner’s rights.

In order to implement article IV(a) of § 13-13-2 , and in furtherance of its purposes, the appropriate authorities having custody of the prisoner shall, promptly upon receipt of the officer’s written request, notify the prisoner and the governor in writing that a request for temporary custody has been made and that notification shall describe the source and contents of the request. The authorities having custody of the prisoner shall also advise him or her in writing of his or her rights to counsel, to make representations to the governor within thirty (30) days, and to contest the legality of his or her delivery.

History of Section. P.L. 1974, ch. 23, § 1.