Chapter 1 Laying Out and Taking by Cities and Towns

24-1-1. Authorization of condemnation.

Whenever the city council of any city or the town council of any town shall determine that the public interest and convenience makes necessary or advantageous the acquisition of land or other real property, or any interest, estate, or right therein for the establishing, laying out, widening, extending or relocating, regrading, straightening, or improving any public highway, street, parkway, or driftway, or to secure more suitable lines, grades or safety, it may proceed to acquire the same by the exercise of eminent domain in the manner prescribed in this chapter, provided that no real property or interest, estate, or right therein belonging to the state shall be acquired without its consent and no real property or interest, estate, or right therein belonging to or used by a public utility shall be acquired without the consent of the division of public utilities and carriers.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 67.

Cross References.

Housing projects, improvements in connection with, § 45-25-24 .

Redevelopment projects, installation or change of streets for, § 45-32-42 .

Subdivision plan, regulations, § 45-23-32 .

Taking of private property, R.I. Const., Art. 1, § 16 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Advantageous.

The term “advantageous”, as used in this section, should be equated with the standard that the acquired land be reasonably required for a public purpose. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

When a city or town undergoes condemnation proceedings because acquisition of the property in question is advantageous to a highway-development scheme, such a taking is a constitutional exercise of the power of eminent domain. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

City Charter.

Where city charter provisions for condemnation differed from those in this chapter, this chapter governed and city council acted properly in following this chapter’s procedures and not the city charter provisions. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

Existing Highways.

Provisions of this chapter did not apply to proceedings to survey, bound, and mark an existing highway. Horgan v. Town Council of Jamestown, 32 R.I. 528 , 80 A. 271, 1911 R.I. LEXIS 71 (1911).

Location.

Location of terminus at a certain lane was sufficiently definite even though the lane was a private way. Hunter v. Newport, 5 R.I. 325 , 1858 R.I. LEXIS 39 (1858).

Town council may order the precise course for a new highway, provided its order requires the survey committee to lay out the highway in a manner most advantageous to the public and with as little damage as possible to adjoining landowners. Watson v. Town Council of S. Kingstown, 5 R.I. 562 , 1859 R.I. LEXIS 54 (1859).

Navigable Waters.

Land covered by navigable waters could not be laid out as street. Simmons v. Mumford, 2 R.I. 172 , 1852 R.I. LEXIS 25 (1852).

Nothing prohibits the laying out of a highway to terminate at a stream. Watson v. Town Council of S. Kingstown, 5 R.I. 562 , 1859 R.I. LEXIS 54 (1859).

Necessity.

Determination that public convenience requires highway is equivalent to finding of necessity and no finding of absolute necessity is required. Hunter v. Newport, 5 R.I. 325 , 1858 R.I. LEXIS 39 (1858).

“Necessary” means “reasonably necessary” with the cost as well as the benefit being considered. Hazard v. Town Council of Middletown, 12 R.I. 227 , 1878 R.I. LEXIS 69 (1878).

Preliminary finding of necessity need not specify the width of the highway required. Boston & P. R. Corp. v. Town Council of Lincoln, 13 R.I. 705 , 1882 R.I. LEXIS 73 (1882); Clarke v. Town Council of S. Kingstown, 18 R.I. 283 , 27 A. 336, 1893 R.I. LEXIS 37 (1893).

Absolute necessity is not required in eminent-domain proceedings. Rather, the appropriate standard to be applied is whether the land taken is reasonably required for a public purpose. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

Ownership.

Right to take sand from land and to erect necessary buildings thereon was a right of ownership. McCotter v. Town Council of New Shoreham, 21 R.I. 43 , 41 A. 572, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 9 (1898).

State Lands.

Approval by the general assembly is necessary to the inclusion of state-owned land in the highway but is not a condition precedent to the laying out. Clarke v. Town Council of S. Kingstown, 18 R.I. 283 , 27 A. 336, 1893 R.I. LEXIS 37 (1893).

Collateral References.

Constitutionality and construction of statute relating to location or relocation of highways. 63 A.L.R. 516.

Inclusion or exclusion of first and last days in computing time for giving notice of hearing for location of public highway, which notice must be given a certain number of days before a known future date. 98 A.L.R.2d 1331.

Power and duty of highway officers as regards location or route of road to be constructed or improved. 91 A.L.R. 242.

Power to condemn property or interest therein to replace other property taken for public use. 20 A.L.R.3d 862.

Prohibition to control action of administrative officers in establishment of highway. 115 A.L.R. 23, 159 A.L.R. 627.

Right of municipality or public to use of subsurface of street or highway for purposes other than sewers, pipes, conduits for wires, and the like, as affected by ownership of fee as between public and abutting owner. 11 A.L.R.2d 180.

Validity of appropriation of property for anticipated future needs. 80 A.L.R.3d 1085.

24-1-2. Filing of plat and declaration.

Within one year after its passage, the city or town council shall cause to be filed in the land evidence records a copy of its resolution declaring that the public interest and convenience makes necessary or advantageous the acquisition of real property in the manner prescribed by this chapter and also a description of the land or other real property indicating the nature and extent of the estate or interest therein taken as provided in this chapter and a plat thereof, and a copy of the resolution, description and plat shall be certified by the city or town clerk.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 97.

24-1-3. Deposit of compensation for property taken.

Immediately after the taking of property, the city or town council shall cause to be filed in the superior court in and for the county in which the real property lies a statement of the sum of money estimated to be just compensation for the property taken, and shall deposit in the superior court to the use of the persons entitled thereto the sum set forth in the statement. The city or town council shall satisfy the court that the amount so deposited with the court is sufficient to satisfy the just claims of all persons having an estate or interest in the real property. Whenever the city or town council satisfies the court that the claims of all persons interested in the real property taken have been satisfied, the unexpended balance shall be ordered repaid immediately to the city or town.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 97.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Ownership.

Curtesy initiate is sufficient interest to entitle husband to compensation. Ross v. Town Council of N. Providence, 10 R.I. 461 , 1873 R.I. LEXIS 19 (1873).

Collateral References.

Payment or deposit of award in court as affecting condemnor’s right to appeal. 40 A.L.R.3d 203.

24-1-4. Vesting of title to property taken.

Upon the filing of the copy of the resolution, description and plat in the land evidence records and upon the making of the deposit in accordance with the order of the superior court, title to the real property in fee simple absolute or such lesser estate or interest therein specified in the resolution shall vest in the city or town, and the real property shall be deemed to be condemned and taken for the use of the city or town, and the right to just compensation for the real property shall vest in the persons entitled thereto.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

24-1-5. Service of notice of condemnation.

After the filing of the copy of the resolution, description and plat, notice of the taking of land or other real property shall be served upon the owners of or persons having any estate or interest in the real property by the city or town sergeant or any constable of the city or town by leaving a copy of the resolution, description and plat attested by the city or town clerk with each of such persons personally, or at the last and usual place of abode in this state with some person living there, and in case any of such persons are absent from this state and have no last and usual place of abode therein occupied by any person, a copy shall be left with the person or persons, if any, in charge of, or having possession of the land or other real property taken of the absent persons, and another copy thereof shall be mailed to the address of the person, if the address is known to the officer serving the notice.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Failure to Give Notice.

Failure to give the prescribed notice invalidated the proceedings, where the defect was pointed out on direct appeal, even though the owner had actual notice. Ross v. Town Council of N. Providence, 10 R.I. 461 , 1873 R.I. LEXIS 19 (1873).

24-1-6. Publication of notice.

After the filing of a resolution, description and plat, the city or town council shall cause a copy of the resolution to be published in some newspaper having general circulation in the city or town at least once a week for three (3) successive weeks. The newspaper notice containing the full resolution, description, and plat shall be inserted once in its entirety and thereafter a weekly formal legal notice shall be inserted stating that there was a taking by the city or town with a brief description of the real property and a reference to the original advertisement which contained the full resolution, description, and plat.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 117, § 1.

24-1-7. Payment of agreed price.

If any party shall agree with the city or town council upon the price to be paid for the value of the land or other real property so taken and of appurtenant damage to any remainder or for the value of the party’s estate, right or interest therein, the court, upon application of the parties in interest, may order that the sum agreed upon be paid forthwith from the money deposited, as the just compensation to be awarded in the proceedings; provided, however, that no payment shall be made to any official or employee of the city or town for any property or interest therein acquired from an official or employee unless the amount of the payment is determined by the court to constitute just compensation to be awarded in the proceedings.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Attempt to Agree.

Honest attempt to agree with owner on damages is a condition precedent to condemnation. McCotter v. Town Council of New Shoreham, 21 R.I. 43 , 41 A. 572, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 9 (1898).

Inquiry of one person as to address of nonresident owner was not a sufficient attempt to locate the owner so as to agree on damages. McCotter v. Town Council of New Shoreham, 21 R.I. 43 , 41 A. 572, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 9 (1898).

Terms Includible in Agreement.

Agreement under former section to make whole the landowner could not bind the town. Chapman v. Pendleton, 34 R.I. 160 , 82 A. 1063, 1912 R.I. LEXIS 40 (1912).

Agreement under former section could include undertaking by town in lieu of monetary compensation to perform work connected with damages sustained by owner. Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. Pendleton, 45 R.I. 477 , 123 A. 562, 1924 R.I. LEXIS 13 (1924).

Agreement could not bind town council to abandon former highway. Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. Pendleton, 45 R.I. 477 , 123 A. 562, 1924 R.I. LEXIS 13 (1924).

Ultra Vires Agreement.

Ultra vires provision did not invalidate remaining portions of agreement. Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. Pendleton, 45 R.I. 477 , 123 A. 562, 1924 R.I. LEXIS 13 (1924).

24-1-8. Assessment of damages by court.

Any owner of, or person entitled to any estate or right in, or interested in any part of the real property so taken, who cannot agree with the city or town council upon the price to be paid for his or her estate, right or interest in such real property so taken and the appurtenant damage to the remainder, may, within one year from the time the sum of money estimated to be just compensation is deposited in the superior court to the use of the persons entitled thereto, apply by petition to the superior court for the county in which the real property is situated, setting forth the taking of his or her land or estate or interest therein and praying for an assessment of damages by the court or by a jury. Upon the filing of a petition the court shall cause twenty (20) days’ notice of the pendency thereof to be given to the city or town by serving the city or town clerk with a certified copy of the petition.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Damage sustained does not include the value as timber of trees removed since the property in such trees remains in the owner. Tucker v. Eldred, 6 R.I. 404 , 1860 R.I. LEXIS 4 (1860).

General benefits to remaining land could not be considered to reduce the damage sustained. Allaire v. Woonsocket, 25 R.I. 414 , 56 A. 262, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 96 (1903).

Landowners were entitled to compensation for both a permanent easement and the denial of access to their property beyond the permanent easement in the light of the most injurious use that the town might make of its easement rights. Hickey v. Town of Burrillville, 713 A.2d 781, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 212 (R.I. 1998).

The loss of landowners’ rights in trees located within the area of a permanent easement should have been considered in valuing the damages resulting from a town’s condemnation action. Hickey v. Town of Burrillville, 713 A.2d 781, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 212 (R.I. 1998).

Parties.

Even if a court was in error in admitting certain parties as petitioners, where the error was not prejudicial, reversal was not required. J.W.A. Realty, Inc. v. Cranston, 121 R.I. 374 , 399 A.2d 479, 1979 R.I. LEXIS 1788 (1979).

Collateral References.

Admissibility, on issue of value of condemned real property, of rental value of other real property. 23 A.L.R.3d 724.

Assemblage or plottage as factor affecting value in eminent domain proceedings. 8 A.L.R.4th 1202.

Award of or pending proceedings for trespass, compensation for property condemned as precluding action for damages arising from prior trespasses. 33 A.L.R.3d 1132.

Compensation for diminution in value of the remainder of property resulting from taking or use of adjoining land of others for the same undertaking. 59 A.L.R.3d 488.

Consideration of fact that landowner’s remaining land will be subject to special assessment in fixing severance damages. 59 A.L.R.3d 534.

Cost of substitute facilities as measure of compensation paid to state or municipality for condemnation of public property. 40 A.L.R.3d 143.

Damages resulting from temporary conditions incident to public improvements or repairs as compensable taking. 23 A.L.R.4th 674.

Deduction of benefits in determining compensation or damages in proceedings involving opening, widening, or otherwise altering highway. 13 A.L.R.3d 1149.

Determination of just compensation for condemnation of billboards or other advertising signs. 73 A.L.R.3d 1122.

Existence of restrictive covenant as element in fixing value of property condemned. 22 A.L.R.3d 961.

Measure and elements of damage for limitation of access caused by conversion of conventional road into limited access highway. 42 A.L.R.3d 148.

Measure and elements of lessee’s compensation for condemnor’s taking or damaging of leasehold. 17 A.L.R.4th 337.

Plotting or planning in anticipation of improvement as taking or damaging of property affected. 37 A.L.R.3d 127.

Recovery of value of improvements made with knowledge of impending condemnation. 98 A.L.R.3d 504.

Right of owner of land not originally taken or purchased as part of adjacent project to recover, on enlargement of project to include adjacent land, enhanced value of property by reason of proximity to original land — state cases. 95 A.L.R.3d 752.

Salting for snow removal as taking or damaging abutting property for eminent domain purposes. 64 A.L.R.3d 1239.

State statute of limitations applicable to inverse condemnation or similar proceedings by landowner to obtain compensation for direct appropriation of land without the institution or conclusion of formal proceedings against specific owner. 26 A.L.R.4th 68.

Traffic noise and vibration from highway as element of damages in eminent domain. 51 A.L.R.3d 860.

Unaccepted offer of purchase of real property as evidence of its value. 25 A.L.R.4th 571.

Unaccepted offer to sell or listing of real property as evidence of its value. 25 A.L.R.4th 983.

Unity or contiguity of separate properties sufficient to allow damages for diminished value of parcel remaining after taking of other parcel. 59 A.L.R.4th 308.

Validity, construction, and effect of statute or lease provision expressly governing rights and compensation of lessee upon condemnation of leased property. 22 A.L.R.5th 327.

24-1-9. Conduct of trial on damages.

After the service of a notice of condemnation the court may proceed to a trial. The trial shall be conducted as other civil actions at law are tried. The trial shall determine all questions of fact relating to the value of the real property, and any estate or interest therein, and the amount thereof, and the appurtenant damage to any remainder and the amount thereof, and the trial and decision or verdict of the jury shall be subject to all rights to except to rulings, to move for new trial, and to appeal, as are provided by law. Upon the entry of judgment in the proceedings, execution shall be issued against the money deposited in court and in default thereof against any other property of the city or town.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

Collateral References.

Admissibility of photographs or models of property condemned. 23 A.L.R.3d 825.

Propriety and effect, in eminent domain proceeding, of argument or evidence as to landowner’s unwillingness to sell property. 17 A.L.R.3d 1449.

Propriety and effect, in eminent domain proceeding, of instruction to the jury as to landowner’s unwillingness to sell property. 20 A.L.R.3d 1081.

Propriety and effect of argument or evidence as to financial status of parties in eminent domain proceeding. 21 A.L.R.3d 936.

Propriety of cross-examining expert witness regarding his status as “professional witness.” 39 A.L.R.4th 742.

24-1-10. Consolidation of petitions.

In case two (2) or more petitioners make claim to the same real property, or to any estate or interest therein, or to different estates or interests in the same real property, the court shall, upon motion, consolidate their several petitions for trial at the same time, and may frame all necessary issues for the trial thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

24-1-11. Representation of infants and incompetents.

If any real property or any estate or interest therein, in which any infant or other person not capable in law to act in his or her own behalf is interested, is taken under the provisions of this chapter, the superior court, upon the filing therein of a petition by or in behalf of the infant or person or by the city or town council, may appoint a guardian ad litem for the infant or other person. Guardians may, with the advice and consent of the superior court, and upon such terms as the superior court may prescribe, release to the city or town all claims for damages for the land of the infant or other person or for any estate or interest therein. Any lawfully appointed, qualified and acting guardian or other fiduciary of the estate of the infant or other person, with the approval of the court of probate within this state having jurisdiction to authorize the sale of lands and properties within this state of the infant or other person, may before the filing of a petition, agree with the city or town council upon the amount of damages suffered by the infant or other person for any taking of his or her real property or of his or her interest or estate therein, and may, upon receiving such amount, release to the city or town all claims for damages for the infant or other person for the taking.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

24-1-12. Late filing of petition.

In case any owner of or any person having an estate or interest in real property shall fail to file his or her petition as provided in § 24-1-8 , the superior court for the county in which the real property is situated, in its discretion, may permit the filing of the petition within one year subsequent to the year following the time of the deposit in the superior court of the sum of money estimated to be just compensation for the property taken; provided, the person shall have had no actual knowledge of the taking of the land in season to file the petition; and provided, no other person or persons claiming to own the real property or estate or interest therein shall have been paid the value thereof; and provided, no judgment has been rendered against the city or town for the payment of the value to any other person or persons claiming to own the real estate.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 52.

24-1-13. Unknown owners.

If any real property or any estate or interest therein is unclaimed or held by a person or persons whose whereabouts are unknown, after making inquiry satisfactory to the superior court for the county in which the real property lies, the city or town council, after the expiration of two (2) years from the first publication of the copy of the resolution and description and plat, may petition the court that the value of the estate or interest of the unknown person or persons be determined. After such notice by publication to the person or persons as the court in its discretion may order, and after a hearing on the petition, the court shall fix the value of the estate or interest and shall order a sum to be deposited in the registry of the court in a special account to accumulate for the benefit of the person or persons, if any, entitled thereto. The receipt of the clerk of the superior court therefor shall constitute a discharge of the city or town from all liability in connection with the taking. When the person entitled to the money deposited shall have satisfied the superior court of his or her right to receive the same, the court shall cause it to be paid over to the person, with all accumulations thereon.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

24-1-14. Orders as to charges on lands.

The superior court shall have power to make such orders with respect to encumbrances, liens, taxes, and other charges on the land, if any, as shall be just and equitable.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

Cross References.

Survival of claims for damages, § 9-1-11 .

24-1-15. Exchange of property.

Whenever in the opinion of the city or town council a substantial saving in the cost of acquiring title can be effected by conveying other real property, title to which is in the city or town, to the person or persons from whom the estate or interest in real property is being purchased or taken, or by the construction or improvement by the city or town of any work or facility upon the remaining real property of the person or persons from whom the estate or interest in real property is being purchased or taken, the city or town council shall be and hereby is authorized to convey such other real property of the city or town to the person or persons from whom the estate or interest in real property is being purchased or taken and to construct or improve any work or facility upon the remaining land of the person or persons.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 216, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Exchange.

A city or town council that purports to exercise its power of eminent domain by requiring an unwilling owner to give up his property in exchange for other property fails to meet the constitutional requirement of just compensation. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

This section meets constitutional standards and may be validly invoked when an owner consents to the exchange of property offered by a city or town. However, in the case of a property owner who does not consent to the proffered exchange of property, the constitutional requirement of just compensation is met only by the payment in money of the fair market value of the condemned property. O'Neill v. East Providence, 480 A.2d 1375, 1984 R.I. LEXIS 593 (R.I. 1984).

Chapter 2 Highways by Grant or Use

24-2-1. Creation of public highways by use.

All lands which have been or shall be quietly, peaceably, and actually used and improved and considered as public highways for the space of twenty (20) years, and which shall be declared by the town council of the town wherein they lie to be public highways, shall be taken and considered as public highways to all intents and purposes as fully and effectually as if the lands had been regularly laid out, recorded and opened by the town council of the town where the lands may lie.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 18; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 18; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 18; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 18; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-1 .

Cross References.

Adverse possession generally, § 34-7-1 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

This section empowers town councils, not individual property owners, to create and to declare public highways. Estate of Konigunda v. Coventry, 605 A.2d 834, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 76 (R.I. 1992).

Common Law Highway.

In view of this section, maintenance by town for less than twenty years would not support the existence of a highway by dedication or user under the common law. Eddy v. Clarke, 38 R.I. 371 , 95 A. 851, 1915 R.I. LEXIS 75 (1915).

Conditional Declaration.

There is no language in this section which can be reasonably construed to authorize a town council to condition its declaration of use with an understanding that a committee would meet at a later date to agree with parties on a terminus for the highway. Conant v. Mott, 107 R.I. 637 , 269 A.2d 790, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 816 (1970).

Dedication.

Declaration under this section cannot be defended on appeal by showing of dedication and acceptance. Goelet v. Board of Aldermen of Newport, 14 R.I. 295 , 1883 R.I. LEXIS 65 (1883).

Deeds.

Deeds were admissible in evidence on appeal to show that land had been considered a highway. Goelet v. Board of Aldermen of Newport, 14 R.I. 295 , 1883 R.I. LEXIS 65 (1883).

Obstruction of Way.

Fence erected other than by owner would not interrupt the period of use unless the fence actually prevented public use as a matter of right. Goelet v. Board of Aldermen of Newport, 14 R.I. 295 , 1883 R.I. LEXIS 65 (1883).

Collateral References.

Acquisition of title to land by adverse possession by state or other governmental unit or agency. 18 A.L.R.3d 678.

Eavesdrop as preventing establishment of highway by prescription. 27 A.L.R. 1147.

Mistake in highway line as giving rise to adverse possession by public. 97 A.L.R. 95.

Railroad right-of-way, establishment by user of highway running longitudinally on. 46 A.L.R. 893.

State statute of limitations applicable to inverse condemnation or similar proceedings by landowner to obtain compensation for direct appropriation of land without the institution or conclusion of formal proceedings against specific owner. 26 A.L.R.4th 68.

Width and boundaries of public highway acquired by prescription or adverse user. 76 A.L.R.2d 535.

24-2-2. Notice of intent to declare highway public.

Every town council, before they proceed to act under the provisions of § 24-2-1 , shall give personal notice of their intention to all persons interested, or who may have any claim to the land over which a highway passes, as described in § 24-2-1 , if known to reside in this state, and if not known, or if known to reside without the state, then in the manner prescribed by § 24-1-6 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 19; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 19; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 19; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 19; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Improper Recordation.

The recording of a plat different from the one contained in the notice pursuant to this section rendered the council action establishing a highway by user invalid. Conant v. Mott, 107 R.I. 637 , 269 A.2d 790, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 816 (1970).

Waiver.

Although it is undisputed that the town council failed to comply with this section, petitioner waived its right to object to the lack of notice by appearing and opposing the declaration on the merits at the hearing. Estate of Konigunda v. Coventry, 605 A.2d 834, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 76 (R.I. 1992).

24-2-3. Appeal of declaration.

Every person aggrieved by the proceedings described in § 24-2-2 may appeal therefrom to the superior court.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 20; C.P.A. 1905, § 1223; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 20; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 20; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 20; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-3 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 53.

24-2-4. Platting of highway.

In declaring lands which have been quietly, peaceably and actually used and improved and considered as public highways and streets for the space of twenty (20) years, to be public highways as provided in § 24-2-1 , the town council of the town in which the lands lie shall determine, mark out, plat, or cause to be marked out and platted, the lands, in width as well as length, by use and improvement appropriated as public highways, and declared as such, and shall cause the plats to be recorded; but nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to affect the requirements or provisions of § 24-2-3 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 21; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 21; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 21; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 21; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-4 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 53.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Descriptions From Third Parties.

The town council did not exceed its authority under this section by permitting a private party (attorney for the developer) to submit to the council a certified legal description of the roadway. Estate of Konigunda v. Coventry, 605 A.2d 834, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 76 (R.I. 1992).

The plain meaning of the words “cause to be marked out” in this section clearly contemplate that a town council may receive property descriptions from third parties. Estate of Konigunda v. Coventry, 605 A.2d 834, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 76 (R.I. 1992).

Failure to Incorporate Plat.

Declaration that did not incorporate a plat was invalid, even though a plat not officially approved was later recorded. Simmons v. Providence, 12 R.I. 8 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 69 (1877).

Improper Recordation.

The recording of a plat different from the one considered at the council meeting and the failure to place markers or stakes in the ground to delineate and mark out the width and length of the roadway, as required by this section, rendered the council action establishing a highway by user invalid. Conant v. Mott, 107 R.I. 637 , 269 A.2d 790, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 816 (1970).

24-2-5. Platting of highways previously declared.

In case any lands have previously been declared to be a public highway under § 24-2-1 , and no such plat was made and recorded as provided in § 24-2-4 , the town council may cause the lands, appropriated by such declaration as a public highway, to be marked out, platted, and recorded as provided in § 24-2-4 ; in which case they shall give the notice and their proceedings shall be subject to the appeal provided in § 24-2-3 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 23; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 23; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 23; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 22; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-5 ; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 68; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 53.

24-2-6. Widening of highways.

If any lands used and improved for twenty (20) years and upwards as a public highway or street, shall not in the judgment of the town council be wide enough for the necessities or convenience of the public, the town council may proceed to widen the highway in whole or in part, pursuing, as to the portions so widened, the steps required by law for laying out new highways.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 22; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 22; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 22; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 22; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-6 .

24-2-7. Proceedings and plats as evidence of highway.

The proceedings before the town council under §§ 24-2-1 24-2-6 , insofar as the proceedings shall not have been set aside on appeal as provided in § 24-2-3 , with the accompanying plat or duly certified copies thereof, shall forever thereafter be conclusive evidence upon the town and all parties notified, and their privies, as to the existence of the highway in width and length as platted, and prima facie evidence thereof as to all others.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 24; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 24; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 24; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 24; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-7 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 53.

24-2-8. Acceptance and opening of highway on land specially granted.

Except as otherwise provided by special act concerning particular cities and towns, whenever the owner of any land shall make a deed thereof to the town in which the land lies, for the especial purpose of being used and improved as a public highway, and the deed shall have been duly acknowledged and recorded, the land shall be thenceforward a public highway to all intents and purposes, and be liable to be opened by the town council of the town where the land shall lie, in the same manner as highways which are laid out by the town council; but no town shall be liable to repair a highway, until the town council thereof shall decree and order that the highway shall be repaired at the expense of the town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 25; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 25; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 25; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 25; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-8 .

Cross References.

Approval of subdivision plat as acceptance of dedicated areas, § 45-23-43 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Acceptance.

Land dedicated under this section remains a highway until abandoned by the town even though never formally accepted as a highway. Greene v. O'Connor, 18 R.I. 56 , 25 A. 692, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 14 (1892).

Common Law Dedication.

Council order declaring highway open and ordering it repaired did not constitute a common law acceptance, where legal title did not vest in the town, since there was no authority for acceptance under such circumstances. Remington v. Millerd, 1 R.I. 93 , 1847 R.I. LEXIS 3 (1847).

Conditional Deed.

Deed containing a condition that land be used for highway purposes did not give grantor right to repossess the property, even though it was not used for such purposes, where no right of reentry was specifically reserved. Greene v. O'Connor, 18 R.I. 56 , 25 A. 692, 1892 R.I. LEXIS 14 (1892).

Sufficiency of Deed.

Deed given by owner of easement and right-of-way did not create a highway. State v. Richmond, 1 R.I. 49 , 1847 R.I. LEXIS 1 (1847).

Highway would not be created under this section unless legal title vested in the town. Remington v. Millerd, 1 R.I. 93 , 1847 R.I. LEXIS 3 (1847).

Unrecorded agreement in defective proceedings under chapter 1 of this title did not constitute deed under this section where the agreement purported to have been signed by owner who could not write and where the signature was not acknowledged. Macari v. Marandola, 63 R.I. 369 , 9 A.2d 21, 1939 R.I. LEXIS 106 (1939).

This section is not applicable to this case as it does not involve a deed of the unnamed avenue to the town, since the trial judge in making express findings of fact found that complainants had failed to sustain their burden of proof that the original grantor’s offer of dedication had been accepted by user and he further found that respondent had sustained his burden of proof of adverse possession of part of the unnamed area. Ott v. Stein, 96 R.I. 186 , 190 A.2d 221, 1963 R.I. LEXIS 70 (1963).

Collateral References.

Private improvement of land dedicated but not used as street as estopping public rights. 36 A.L.R.4th 625.

24-2-8.1. Acceptance and upgrading of access into highway system in town of Charlestown.

  1. The town of Charlestown shall be permitted to utilize the below listed procedure to provide for the acceptance and upgrading of highways not yet accepted into the town’s highway system:
    1. Owners of land fronting on an existing means of ingress and egress to their property which has not been accepted into the town highway system may make application to the town council for acceptance by the town of the access into the town’s highway system.
    2. The application must be signed by seventy-five percent (75%) of the owners of land with frontage on the access presented for acceptance.
    3. The access presented for acceptance must be connectable to an accepted town highway or a highway maintained by the state.
      1. Upon receipt of application, the town will obtain an estimate of cost to create from the access a highway to be accepted by the town into the town highway system.
      2. The town shall provide the applicants with a copy of the estimate.
    4. To have the access improved or a road constructed by the town the applicants shall agree by written contract to the following:
      1. To repay the town for the cost of construction or improvement as outlined in the estimate provided them. Repayment to the town shall not exceed fifteen (15) years and shall be repaid with interest not to exceed the “prime rate” at the date of contract.
      2. The percentage of repayment of the total estimate for each landowner shall be based on the frontage owned by the landowner divided by the total frontage on both sides of the access.
      3. The repayment agreement shall be binding on the landowner’s heirs and assigns, shall be recorded on the land records of the town, shall create a tax lien against the land until fully repaid and shall be collectable on nonpayment under the provisions of chapter 9 of title 44.
      4. The landowner shall deed to the town the land necessary for construction or improvement as the town shall designate.
      5. Upon completion of the obligations of the applicants and the recording of the repayment contract the town shall contract for the construction or improvements outlined in the estimate and shall accept the improved highway into the town highway system and shall be liable for the mending and repairing of the highway.
      6. The town shall be entitled during construction or improvement of the access into an acceptable town highway to use those portions of the applying landowner’s property as needed to construct or improve the highway without payment of compensation to the landowner.
  2. This section shall not be construed to limit the town from exercising any of its rights under law and is intended only to provide a mechanism to provide landowners with a means of upgrading access to their property and repaying the town over an agreed period of time at an agreed interest rate.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 180, § 1.

24-2-8.2. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 481, § 1; Repealed by P.L. 1986, ch. 198, § 57, effective June 18, 1986. For present similar provisions of law, see § 24-2-8.1 .

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-2-8.2 concerned acceptance of access into highway system in the town of Charlestown.

24-2-8.3. Acceptance and upgrading of access into highway system in town of Richmond.

  1. The town of Richmond shall be permitted to utilize the below listed procedure to provide for the acceptance and upgrading of highways not yet accepted into the town’s highway system:
    1. Owners of land fronting on an existing means of ingress and egress to their property which has not been accepted into the town highway system may make application to the town council for acceptance by the town of the access into the town’s highway system.
    2. The application must be signed by sixty-six and two-thirds percent (662/3%) of the owners of land with frontage on the access presented for acceptance.
    3. The access presented for acceptance must be connectable to an accepted town highway or a highway maintained by the state.
      1. Upon receipt of application, the town will obtain an estimate of cost to create from the access a highway to be accepted by the town into the town highway system.
      2. The town shall provide the applicants with a copy of the estimate.
    4. To have the access improved or a road constructed by the town the applicants shall agree by written contract to the following:
      1. To repay the town for the cost of construction or improvement as outlined in the estimate provided them. Repayment to the town shall not exceed fifteen (15) years and shall be repaid with interest not to exceed the “prime rate” at the date of contract.
      2. The percentage of repayment of the total estimate for each landowner shall be based on the frontage owned by the landowner divided by the total frontage on both sides of the access.
      3. The repayment agreement shall be binding on the landowner’s heirs and assigns, shall be recorded on the land records of the town, shall create a tax lien against the land until fully repaid and shall be collectable on nonpayment under the provisions of chapter 9 of title 44.
      4. The landowner shall deed to the town the land necessary for construction or improvement as the town shall designate.
      5. Upon completion of the obligations of the applicants and the recording of the repayment contract the town shall contract for the construction or improvements outlined in the estimate and shall accept the improved highway into the town highway system and shall be liable for the mending and repairing of the highway.
      6. The town shall be entitled during construction or improvement of the access into an acceptable town highway to use those portions of the applying landowner’s property as needed to construct or improve the highway without payment of compensation to the landowner.
  2. This section shall not be construed to limit the town from exercising any of its rights under law and is intended only to provide a mechanism to provide landowners with a means of upgrading access to their property and repaying the town over an agreed period of time at an agreed interest rate.

History of Section. P.L. 1986, ch. 124, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 485, § 1.

24-2-8.4. Acceptance and upgrading of access into highway system in town of Burrillville.

  1. The town of Burrillville shall be permitted to utilize the below listed procedure to provide for the acceptance and upgrading of highways not yet accepted into the town’s highway system:
    1. Owners of land fronting on an existing means of ingress and egress to their property which has not been accepted into the town highway system may make application to the town council for acceptance by the town of the access into the town’s highway system.
    2. The application must be signed by sixty-six and two thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the owners of land with frontage on the access presented for acceptance.
    3. The access presented for acceptance must be connectable to an accepted town highway or a highway maintained by the state. For good cause shown this provision may be waived by the town council.
      1. Whenever the council shall determine to consider the acceptance and upgrading of highways into the town’s highway and defray the cost and expense thereof, or any part thereof by special assessment, the council may cause the town manager or his or her designee to make an investigation of the proposed public improvement and report his or her findings to the council. The report shall include an analysis of the following:
        1. The estimated cost of the proposed public improvement; and
        2. Plans and specifications for the public improvement.
      2. There shall also be included recommendations as to the following:
        1. The portion of the cost to be borne by a special assessment and the portion, if any, to be borne by the town at large;
        2. The extent of the improvement and boundaries of the highways to be accepted into the town’s highway system;
        3. The number of installments in which assessments may be paid; and
        4. Any other facts or recommendations which will aid the council in determining whether the improvements shall be made and how the same shall be financed.
    4. No expenditure, except for the necessary procedures of the council and for the preparing of necessary profiles, plans, specifications and estimates of cost, shall be made for any public improvements, the cost of which is to be paid by special assessment upon the property especially benefitted thereby, until the council has passed a resolution determining to proceed with the public improvement.
    5. Upon receipt of the report of the town manager, if the council shall determine to proceed with the improvement, it shall, by resolution, order the report prepared by the town manager filed with the town clerk. In addition, by the resolution, the council shall tentatively determine to proceed with the public improvement, tentatively determine the necessity thereof and set forth the nature thereof, tentatively designate the limits of the special assessment to be affected and describe the lands to be assessed, tentatively determine the part or proportion of the cost of the public improvement to be paid by the lands specially benefitted thereby and the part or proportion, if any to be paid by the town at large for benefit to the town at large, and shall direct the assessor to make a special assessment roll of the part or proportion of the cost to be borne by the lands specially benefitted according to the benefits received and to report the same to the council. The assessment shall be made on all land abutting the road constructed at a uniform rate for each front foot of the land upon the road or any other method or combination of methods which the town council shall determine to be equitable and fair; provided, however, that no parcel of land shall be assessed for an amount in excess of the benefit conferred thereon as determined by the town council.
    6. When the special assessment roll shall have been reported to the council, it shall order the roll filed in the office of the town clerk for public examination along with the report of the town manager required to be made pursuant to subsection (a)(4), and shall fix a date, time and place when the council shall meet to finally determine the necessity of the improvement, limits of the special assessment district and to review the roll and to hear complaints. The town manager’s report and the assessment roll shall be open to public inspection for a period of seven (7) days before the hearing required by this section. The town clerk shall give notice of the hearing by the council to determine the necessity for the improvement, composition of the district and review of the special assessment roll, and to hear objections by publication at least once in a newspaper printed and circulated in the town at least ten (10) days prior to the time of the meetings, and shall further cause notice of the meeting to be mailed by first-class mail to each property owner in the special assessment district as shown by the current assessment rolls on file with the tax assessor.
    7. The council shall meet and hear objections to the public improvement to the special assessment district, and the special assessment roll therefor at the time and place appointed or at an adjourned meeting thereof and shall consider any objections thereto. The council may revise, correct or amend the plans, estimates of cost, special assessment district and special assessment roll. If any changes shall be made which result in additions to the special assessment district or increases in the special assessment roll, then a second hearing shall be held with respect to the changes and notice of the hearing shall be given in the same manner as required for the first hearing. After the hearing, or second hearing if required, the council may, by resolution, determine to proceed with the public improvement, determine the necessity thereof and set forth the nature thereof, designate the limits of the special assessment district to be affected and describe the lands to be assessed, finally determine the part or proportion of the cost of the public improvement to be paid by the lands specially benefitted thereby and the part or portion, if any, to be paid by the town at large for benefit to the town at large. The council may also confirm the special assessment roll with the corrections as it may have made, if any, or may refer it back to the assessor for revision, or may annul it or any proceedings in connection therewith. The assessor shall endorse the date of confirmation upon each special assessment roll.
    8. Upon completion of the construction of the road, the town shall accept the road into the town’s highway system and maintain it in the same manner as other town accepted roads.
    9. If during or prior to the hearing by the council, the owners of more than one-half (1/2) of the property to be assessed shall object in writing to the improvement, the assessment shall not be made and the improvement shall not take place.
    10. All special assessments contained in any special assessment roll, including any part thereof to be paid in installments, shall, from the date of confirmation of such roll, constitute a lien upon the respective lots or parcels of land assessed and until paid shall be a charge against the respective owners of the several lots and parcels of land and a debt to the town from the persons to whom they are assessed. The lien shall be of the same character and effect as the lien created by the statute for real property taxes, and shall include accrued interest and fees. No judgment or decree nor act of the council vacating a special assessment shall destroy or impair the lien of the town upon the premises assessed for such amount of the assessment as may be equitably charged against the same, or as by a regular mode of proceeding might be lawfully assessed thereon. All special assessments shall become due upon confirmation of the special assessment roll or in annual installments, not to exceed fifteen (15) in number, as the council may determine at the time of confirmation, and, if annual installments, the council may determine the first installment to be due upon confirmation or upon any other date the council may prescribe, and the subsequent installments annually thereafter. Deferred installments shall bear interest at such rate as the council may prescribe which shall not exceed seven percent (7%) per annum.
    11. Whenever any special assessment roll shall be confirmed and be payable, the council shall direct the roll to the tax collector for collection. The tax collector shall mail statements of the several assessments to the respective owners of the several lots and parcels of land assessed, as indicated by the records of the assessor, stating the amount of the assessment and the manner in which it may be paid, provided, however, that failure to mail any statement shall not invalidate the assessment or entitle the owner to an extension of time during which to pay the assessment.
    12. The whole or any part of any such assessment may be paid in full at any time after the date of confirmation of the special assessment roll until the time as the council shall prescribe without interest or penalty.
    13. Each special assessment shall be collected by the tax collector with the same rights and remedies as provided by law for the collection of taxes, except as otherwise provided herein.
    14. After the expiration of the period set forth in subsection (a)(13) for payment without interest or fees, any installment may be discharged by paying the face amount thereof, together with fees and interest thereon from the date of confirmation to the date of payment.
    15. Upon completion of the improvement, the financing and the payment of the cost thereof, the treasurer shall certify to the council the total cost of the improvement together with the amount of the original roll for the improvement.
    16. Should the assessments on any special assessment roll, including the amount assessed to the town at large, prove insufficient for which they were made, then the council may make additional pro rata assessments to supply the deficiency against the town and the several lots and parcels of land in the same ratio as the original assessments, but the total amount assessed against any lot or parcel of land shall not exceed the value of the benefits received from the improvement.
    17. Should the special assessment or the proceeds of sale of any special assessment bonds prove larger than necessary to meet the costs of the improvement or to meet the principal and interest requirements of any special assessment bonds and expenses incidental thereof, the excess shall be placed in the town treasury. If more than five percent (5%), the excess shall be returned pro rata according to assessments; except as otherwise provided in this section. No refunds may be made which contravene the provisions of any evidence of indebtedness secured in whole or in part by such special assessment.
    18. Should any lots or lands be divided after a special assessment thereon has been confirmed and divided into installments, the assessor shall apportion the uncollected amounts upon the several lots and lands so divided, and shall enter the several amounts as amendments upon the special assessment roll. The tax collector, shall, within ten (10) days after such apportionment, send notice of such action to all interested persons at their last known address by first-class mail. The apportionment shall be final and conclusive on all parties unless protest in writing is received by the tax collector within twenty (20) days of the mailing of the notice.
    19. Whenever the council deems any special assessment invalid or defective, or whenever a court adjudges an assessment to be illegal in whole or in part, the council may cause a new assessment to be levied for the same purpose, whether or not the improvement or any part thereof has been completed, or any part of the special assessment collected. All proceedings on the reassessment and for the collection thereof shall be conducted in the same manner as provided for in the original assessment. If any portion of the original special assessment is collected and not refunded, it shall be applied upon the reassessment, and the reassessment shall, to that extent, be deemed satisfied. If more than the amount reassessed is collected, the balance shall be refunded to the person making such payment.
    20. If, in any action, it shall appear that by reason of any irregularities or informalities, the assessment has not been properly made against the person assessed or upon the lot or premises sought to be charged, the court may, nevertheless, upon satisfactory proof that expense has been incurred by the town which is a proper charge against the person assessed or the lot or premises in question, render judgment for the amount properly chargeable against such person or upon such lot or premises.
    21. In any case where the provisions of this section may prove to be insufficient to carry into full effect the making of any improvement or the special assessment therefor, the council shall provide any additional steps or procedure required to effect the improvement by special assessment in the resolution declaring the determination of the council to make such improvement in the first instance.
  2. This section shall not be construed to limit the town from exercising any of its rights under law and is intended only to provide a mechanism to provide landowners with a means of upgrading access to their property and repaying the town over an agreed period of time at an agreed interest rate.

History of Section. P.L. 1992, ch. 474, § 1.

24-2-8.5. Acceptance and upgrading of access into highway system in town of West Warwick.

  1. The town of West Warwick is permitted to utilize the below listed procedure to provide for the acceptance and upgrading of highways not yet accepted into the town’s highway system:
    1. Owners of land fronting on an existing means of ingress and egress to their property which has not been accepted into the town highway system may make application to the town council for acceptance by the town of the access into the town’s highway system.
    2. The application must be signed by sixty-six and two-thirds percent (662/3%) of the owners of land with frontage on the access presented for acceptance.
    3. The access presented for acceptance must be connectable to an accepted town highway or a highway maintained by the state.
      1. Upon receipt of application, the town will obtain an estimate of cost to create from the access a highway to be accepted by the town into the town highway system.
      2. The town shall provide the applicants with a copy of the estimate.
    4. To have the access improved or a road constructed by the town the applicants shall agree by written contract to the following:
      1. To repay the town for the cost of construction or improvement as outlined in the estimate provided them. Repayment to the town shall not exceed fifteen (15) years and shall be repaid with interest not to exceed the “prime rate” at the date of contract.
      2. The percentage of repayment of the total estimate for each landowner shall be based on the frontage owned by the landowner divided by the total frontage on both sides of the access.
      3. The repayment agreement shall be binding on the landowner’s heirs and assigns, shall be recorded on the land records of the town, shall create a tax lien against the land until fully repaid and shall be collectable on nonpayment under the provisions of chapter 9 of title 44.
      4. The landowner shall deed to the town the land necessary for construction or improvement as the town shall designate.
      5. Upon completion of the obligations of the applicants and the recording of the repayment contract the town shall contract for the construction or improvements outlined in the estimate and shall accept the improved highway into the town highway system and shall be liable for the mending and repairing of the highway.
      6. The town is entitled during construction or improvement of the access into an acceptable town highway to use those portions of the applying landowner’s property as needed to construct or improve the highway without payment of compensation to the landowner.
  2. This section shall not be construed to limit the town from exercising any of its rights under law and is intended only to provide a mechanism to provide landowners with a means of upgrading access to their property and repaying the town over an agreed period of time at an agreed interest rate.

History of Section. P.L. 2000, ch. 400, § 1.

24-2-9. Common law rights and remedies preserved.

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be so construed as to hinder or prevent the public from acquiring, by dedication or user, lands or any interests in lands for highways or other public uses, according to the course of the common law, or to take away or abridge any legal or equitable remedy by the common or the general law provided in cases of injuries to, or obstructions to, the enjoyment of lands, or in any interest in lands thus or otherwise by law acquired by the public, or devoted to public uses.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 26; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 26; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 26; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 26; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-9 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

This section does not provide for statutory dedication but merely preserves the common law form. Newport v. Sisson, 51 R.I. 481 , 155 A. 576, 1931 R.I. LEXIS 79 (1931).

Collateral References.

Relative rights of abutting owners and public authorities in parkways in center of street. 81 A.L.R.2d 1436.

24-2-10. Liability of town for maintenance of highways.

Nothing contained in § 24-2-9 shall be so construed as to render any town liable for the mending and repairing of any highway, unless the highway shall have been declared to be a public highway by the town council of the town wherein it lies.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 27; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 27; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 27; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 27; G.L. 1956, § 24-2-10 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Acquisition or Adoption.

This section did not change the common law rule that a town may by acquiescence or adoption acquire a duty to maintain a highway without a declaration by the town council. State v. Cumberland, 6 R.I. 496 , 1860 R.I. LEXIS 22 (1860); Eddy v. Clarke, 38 R.I. 371 , 95 A. 851, 1915 R.I. LEXIS 75 (1915).

Posting.

Posting as private property a road that was already a highway by common law dedication may have constituted a warning that town was not under duty to maintain the road. Union Co. v. Peckham, 16 R.I. 64 , 12 A. 130, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 6 (1888).

Chapter 3 Improvement and Grading by Towns

24-3-1. Power to mark out, widen or relocate municipal roads.

Town councils may mark out, relay, widen, straighten, or change the location of the whole of or any part of any municipal road, whether laid out by the state or otherwise, except the highways on both sides of the Woonasquatucket River directed to be laid out by chapter 362 of the Public Laws, passed at the January session of the general assembly in the year 1861; and thereupon like proceedings shall be had in all respects, so far as the same are applicable, including appeals, as are provided in this chapter in case of taking land and ascertaining damages to the owners of lands taken in laying out or in case of the abandonment of highways.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 28; P.L. 1903, ch. 1106, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 28; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 28; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 28; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-1 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 1.

Cross References.

Department of transportation, maintenance and construction of roads, § 37-5-2 .

Housing projects, improvements in connection with, § 45-25-24 .

Public utility franchises, § 39-17-1 et seq.

Railroad crossings, § 39-8-1 et seq.

Redevelopment projects, installation or change of streets, § 45-32-42 .

Subdivision plans, § 45-23-32 .

Water supply, change in highway for, § 39-15-1 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Abandonment.

Town council did not have authority in a proceeding under this chapter to approve a new line that excluded a portion of the former highway when surveyor could have determined the former line by use of existing landmarks. Gill v. Town Council of Jamestown, 47 R.I. 425 , 133 A. 806, 1926 R.I. LEXIS 77 (1926).

Proceeding under this chapter to relay a highway was not effective to abandon that portion of former highway excluded in the relaying without separate proceedings under chapter 6 of this title. Davis v. Girard, 59 R.I. 471 , 196 A. 254, 1938 R.I. LEXIS 182 (1938).

Waiver of Irregularities.

Landowners waived irregularities in proceedings by agreeing as to damages and town was liable on agreement to the same extent as if the proceedings had been entirely regular. Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. Pendleton, 45 R.I. 477 , 123 A. 562, 1924 R.I. LEXIS 13 (1924).

Collateral References.

Damage resulting from temporary conditions incident to public improvements or repairs as compensable taking. 23 A.L.R.4th 674.

Estoppel of municipality as to encroachments upon public streets. 44 A.L.R.3d 257.

24-3-2. Repealed.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 29; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 29; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 29; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 29; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-2 ; Repealed by P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 2, effective July 1, 1988.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-3-2 concerned the power of councils over highways laid out by the general assembly.

24-3-3. Hearing on enlargement or relocation in towns — Commissioners of estimate and assessment.

Whenever the town council of any town named in § 24-3-17 , shall adjudge it to be necessary to lay out, enlarge, straighten, improve, or alter any street or highway, or any part thereof, in the town, the council may cause the same to be done in the manner following: Whenever any lands shall be required for the purpose aforesaid, and the town council shall be of the opinion that any estates will be specially benefited thereby, the council shall, after notice to all persons interested, which notice shall specify the time and place of the meetings of the council and the nature and extent of the intended improvement, and after hearing all persons who desire to be heard in the matter, appoint not less than three (3) nor more than five (5) discreet and disinterested persons as commissioners of estimate and assessment, who may be residents and taxpayers in the town; and the council may at the same time determine that a portion of the damage occasioned by taking any real estate for the aforesaid purpose, not exceeding three-fourths (3/4) thereof, shall be assessed upon the owners of estates which the commissioners shall find will be specially benefited by making the proposed improvement, whether any part of the estates are taken for the improvement or not; provided, that the owners shall not be assessed in any case beyond the amount that the commissioners shall consider their estates to be specially benefited thereby. The commissioners, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall be severally engaged to the faithful discharge of the trust and duties required of them.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 32; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 35; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 35; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 35; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-3 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 54.

Cross References.

Power of towns to appropriate money, § 45-2-3 .

24-3-4. Assessment of benefits and damages in cities.

Whenever the city council of any city shall adjudge it to be necessary to lay out, enlarge, straighten, improve or alter any street or highway, or any part thereof, in the city, and any lands shall be required for the purpose aforesaid, and the city council shall be of the opinion that any estates will be specially benefited thereby, and the city council shall determine what portion of the damage occasioned by taking any real estate for the aforesaid purpose, not exceeding three-fourths (3/4) thereof, shall be assessed upon the owners of estates which the commissioners appointed under this chapter shall find to be specially benefited by making the proposed improvement, whether any part of the estates are taken for the improvement or not (provided, that the owners shall not be assessed in any case beyond the amount that the commissioners shall consider their estates to be specially benefited thereby), the city council of the city shall thereupon proceed in the same manner and with the same powers and authority as is given to town councils in § 24-3-3 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 33; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 36; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 36; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 36; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-4 .

24-3-5. Commissioners’ estimate and report.

The commissioners shall cause a survey and plat of the proposed alteration to be made; and shall cause notice to be given to all persons interested in the lands to be taken or in the improvement to be made, and to all persons who are owners of lands which, in the opinion of the commissioners, will be benefited by the proposed alterations, of the time and place of making an estimate of the value of the property so required to be taken, and of the special benefits to be conferred by making the alterations; and at the time and place appointed in the notice, the commissioners shall proceed to make a just estimate of the amount of the damage occasioned to the respective owners, lessees, parties, or persons entitled to or interested in the lands taken for the alteration, and also a just estimate of the value of the special benefits, if any, caused thereby, to the several owners of lands not required for the proposed improvements, but which will, in the opinion of the commissioners, be benefited thereby; and the commissioners shall report thereon to the town council or city council without unnecessary delay. The commissioners shall set forth in the report the names of the owners of, and persons in any way interested in, any of the land taken for the proposed improvement, so far as the names can be ascertained, and a description or designation of the several parcels thereof, with the damage and benefit to each respectively. The commissioners shall further apportion and assess a portion of the damage and cost of improvements as the town or city council may have directed, ascertained as provided, upon the owners of the estate so specially benefited, in proportion to the special benefits conferred; provided, that the amount of the assessment shall not exceed the amount of the special benefits, ascertained as provided.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 34; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 37; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 37; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 37; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-5 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Contents of Report.
— Interested Persons.

Report was not required to include name of lessee whose interest did not appear in the land records and who failed to attend hearing on estimate. Whalen v. Bates, 19 R.I. 274 , 33 A. 224, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 73 (1895).

24-3-6. Filing and notice of report.

The town council or city council shall, within fourteen (14) days after the making of a report, cause personal notice to be served upon all persons named in the report, residing in the state, and shall also cause a copy of the notice to be published, as provided in § 24-3-7 , to the effect that the report has been filed in the clerk’s office, and that any person aggrieved by the report must file, with the clerk of the superior court for the county where the town or city is situated, a notice in writing of his or her intention to claim a jury trial as provided in § 24-3-8 ; and he or she shall also cause a copy of the report to be filed with the clerk of the superior court.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 35; C.P.A. 1905, § 1216; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 38; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 38; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 38; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-6 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 54.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Personal Notice.
— Interested Persons.

Lessee whose interest did not appear in the land records, who failed to attend hearing on estimate, and who was not listed in the report, was not entitled to personal notice under this section. Whalen v. Bates, 19 R.I. 274 , 33 A. 224, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 73 (1895).

24-3-7. Publication and posting of notices.

The notice required by §§ 24-3-3 24-3-6 in addition to the personal notice, shall be given by publishing the notice once a week for two (2) succeeding weeks in at least two (2) newspapers such as the town council or city council may order; and they shall also cause three (3) or more copies of the notice to be posted in conspicuous public places on or near the place where the proposed improvements are to be made; provided, however, that the first publication of the notice required by § 24-3-6 shall be made within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the report.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 43; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 46; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 46; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 46; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-7 .

24-3-8. Jury trial on report.

Every person aggrieved by the report of the commissioners shall, within sixty (60) days after the first publication of the notice of the filing of the report named in § 24-3-6 , file with the clerk of the superior court a notice in writing of his or her intention to claim a jury trial; and in case the aggrieved person fails to file such notice, he or she shall not be entitled to a jury trial. Any person filing a notice may have a trial by jury before the superior court, to determine the amount of damage and benefit to him or her to be apportioned, upon issues to be for that purpose framed under the direction of the court; and if the person applying for a jury trial shall fail to obtain an increase of damages, or a diminution of the amount of benefit, assessed by the commissioners, the person shall pay all costs arising after the application for a jury and the court shall enter judgment and issue execution therefor; and in other cases the costs shall be paid by the town or city.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 36; C.P.A. 1905, § 1216; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 39; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 39; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 39; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-8 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Aggrieved Persons.

Abutting landowner had right to appeal, even though report showed no land taken from him, where possible question existed as to the validity or construction of a previous deed for highway purposes. Sweet v. Cranston, 23 R.I. 466 , 50 A. 851, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 136 (1902).

Abutting landowners had standing to object to report that reduced the width of the highway, even though such reduction gave landowners land that they had previously fenced in. Gill v. Town Council of Jamestown, 47 R.I. 425 , 133 A. 806, 1926 R.I. LEXIS 77 (1926).

Statement of Grounds.

Claimant of jury trial was not required to state his grounds in his claim. Sweet v. Cranston, 23 R.I. 466 , 50 A. 851, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 136 (1902).

24-3-9. Election by council to make or discontinue improvements.

The town or city council shall, within one hundred twenty (120) days after the first publication of notice required by § 24-3-8 , elect whether or not they will make improvements, and the town or city council may, at any time before election, discontinue all further proceedings relative thereto, but the town or city, upon the discontinuance, shall be liable for all costs, fees and expenses which shall have accrued; and the court may enter judgment and issue execution therefor as to the costs accrued on an appeal.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 37; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 40; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 40; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 40; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-9 .

24-3-10. Taking of possession by town — Removal of crops and improvements.

The town or city, after electing by the town or city council to make the improvements as provided in § 24-3-9 , shall become seized of all the land in the report mentioned that shall be required for making the improvements, in trust for use as a public highway. And the town or city may, by the person and at such time as the town council or city council shall order, take possession of the land or any part thereof, without any process of law, and remove all buildings and other impediments as the town council or city council shall order and direct; provided, that the owner of the land shall have the right, within thirty (30) days after the town or city council shall have elected to make the improvements, or within such further time as the town council or city council may grant, to remove all crops, trees, buildings or other improvements thereon, for his or her own use and benefit.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 38; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 41; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 41; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 41; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-10 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 55.

24-3-11. Confirmation of reports.

The town council or city council, after the election to make improvements, as provided in § 24-3-9 , shall confirm the report of the commissioners to all persons who have not given notice of their intention to claim a jury trial as provided in § 24-3-8 , and shall finally confirm the report, as to those persons who shall have claimed a trial by jury, in accordance with the verdicts rendered, or in accordance with such other disposition as shall have been made of the claims for a jury trial; and the report, so confirmed, shall be final and conclusive upon the parties.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 39; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 42; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 42; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 42; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-11 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 55.

24-3-12. Termination of leases and contracts on land taken.

Whenever the whole of any lot or parcel of land, or any building under lease or other contract, shall be taken as provided in § 24-3-10 , for any of the purposes as provided in this chapter, upon the election of the town or city council, as provided in § 24-3-9 , to make improvements, the lease or contract shall immediately cease and determine and be absolutely discharged. In case only part of any parcel of real estate so under lease or other contract shall be taken, all contracts and engagements respecting the parcel shall, from the time of the election, cease and determine, and be absolutely discharged as to the part so taken, but shall remain valid as to the residue, and the rents, considerations, and payments, reserved or payable and to be paid for or in respect of the time, shall be apportioned so that the just proportional part thereof shall be demanded or paid or recoverable for or in respect of the rents, considerations, and payments.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 40; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 43; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 43; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 43; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-12 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 55.

24-3-13. Payment of damages awarded — Action against town.

The town or city shall, within four (4) months after the confirmation of the report of the commissioners, pay to the person entitled thereto the amount of damage finally awarded upon the report. In the case of a default of the payment, the person entitled to the payment, after application to the town or city council for payment thereof, may sue the town or city for and recover the payment, with interest. In the suit it shall be sufficient to declare generally for so much money due the plaintiff, by virtue of this chapter, for premises taken for the purpose herein mentioned; and the plaintiff may give any special matter in evidence under a general declaration, with proof of the right of the plaintiff to the sum demanded.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 41; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 44; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 44; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 44; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-13 .

24-3-14. Collection of assessments for benefits — Lien.

The amount of benefit apportioned and assessed to the owners of real estate by the commissioners in their report, confirmed as aforesaid, and required by the report to be paid by the respective owners, shall be added to the taxes assessed against the real estate and the owners thereof by the assessors of taxes at the next or any subsequent annual assessment of taxes after the confirmation of the report, and shall be and remain a lien upon the real estates from and after the confirmation until it is paid, and shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the other taxes assessed against the real estate and the owners thereof; except in cases where the estates are owned by nonresidents in the state, or minors, in which case one year in addition shall be allowed.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 42; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 45; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 45; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 45; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-14 .

24-3-15. Compensation and expenses of commissioners.

The commissioners shall be entitled to receive for their services a reasonable compensation, to be allowed by the town council or city council; and all sums reasonably expended for maps, plats, and clerk hire and other necessary expenses, shall be paid by the town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 44; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 47; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 47; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 47; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-15 .

24-3-16. Declaration of opening of highway.

Whenever all buildings and impediments have been removed, by order of the town council or city council, from the street or portion thereof taken, and the street shall be open for public use, the town council or city council shall declare the opening, and it shall be a public highway.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 45; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 48; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 48; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 48; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-16 .

24-3-17. Cities and towns affected.

Sections 24-3-3 24-3-16 shall apply only to the cities of Newport, Pawtucket, Woonsocket, Central Falls, Cranston, Warwick, and the towns of Lincoln, Johnston, Warren, Bristol, Middletown, East Greenwich, East Providence, New Shoreham, Little Compton, West Warwick, Cumberland, Barrington, Jamestown, North Providence, Westerly, South Kingstown, Narragansett, and Glocester.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 46; P.L. 1897, ch. 503, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 49; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 49; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 49; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-17 ; P.L. 1990, ch. 296, § 1.

24-3-18. Commissioners to define grade.

Whenever in any town any person or persons owning land abutting on any platted street or way, which is not a public highway, the plat of which is recorded in the office of the clerk of the town in which the land is situated, shall petition the town council of the town to cause the grade of any street or way to be defined, the town council shall appoint three (3) discreet and disinterested persons, residents and taxpayers of the town, as commissioners to define the grade of the street or way; which commissioners, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall be engaged to the faithful discharge of the trust.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 37; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 37; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 36; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 36; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-18 .

24-3-19. Notice of report on definition of grade.

The town council thereupon shall cause such notice as the council may deem best to be given to all the owners of land abutting on the street or way, to appear before the council at the time named in the notice, if they shall see fit, and be heard for or against receiving the report.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 38; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 38; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 37; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 37; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-19 .

Collateral References.

“Owner”, scope and import of term, in statutes relating to change of grade of street or highway. 2 A.L.R. 788, 95 A.L.R. 1085.

24-3-20. Council action on commissioners’ report — Recording.

The town council shall, after hearing the persons appearing to be heard, proceed to reject, confirm, or recommit the report of the commissioners in whole or in part, to the same or new commissioners, to be appointed by the town council for that purpose, who shall revise the report and make a return thereof without delay to the town council; whereupon the town council shall reject or confirm, or again recommit the report in the manner as provided in § 24-3-11 , as right and justice shall require. And if the report shall be confirmed, the town council shall cause the report, together with the profile plat accompanying the report, to be recorded.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 39; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 39; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 38; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 38; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-20 .

24-3-21. Effect of definition of grade.

Whenever any street or way shall be received and established as a public highway, the defined grade shall be the established grade of the street or highway; but no action relating to the grade of any street or highway shall be so construed as to be a receiving or establishing of any street or way as a public highway.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 40; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 40; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 39; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 39; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-21 .

24-3-22. Compensation and expenses of commissioners — Collection from petitioners.

The commissioners shall be entitled to a reasonable compensation for their services, and for all sums of money expended for the plat and other necessary disbursements, to be allowed by the town council, whether the report is rejected, confirmed, or recommitted, to be paid by the petitioners, the amount of which shall be equally apportioned and assessed to the petitioners by the assessors of taxes; and unless paid forthwith by the petitioners, shall be added to the taxes assessed against the real estate abutting on the platted street or way belonging to the petitioners and the petitioners owning the property at the next annual assessment of taxes; and shall be and remain a lien upon the real estate until it is paid, and shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the other taxes assessed against the petitioners, except in cases where the petitioners are nonresidents of this state or of the United States, in which cases one year in addition shall be allowed for the payment of the assessment.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 41; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 41; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 40; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 40; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-22 .

24-3-23. Grading or change of grade — Notice and hearing.

Town councils may order highways or parts of highways to be graded within their respective towns, and whenever a grade for any highway shall be established the grade shall not be changed without the consent of the town council of the town in which it is located, nor without notice to the proprietors of lands abutting on the highway, which notice, if the proprietor resides within this state, shall be served five (5) days before the passing of an order for the grade or change of grade, and if any of the proprietors reside without the state, notice shall be served upon them as provided by § 24-1-6 . At the time and place named in the notice, the town council shall proceed to hear the parties, and to pass an order in reference to the grade, or change of grade, as they may think proper.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 28; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 28; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 27; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 27; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-23 .

Cross References.

Notice of order to lay sidewalk, § 24-7-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Change of Grade.

Legal grade cannot be changed by user, waiver, or estoppel. Rousseau v. Fortin, 54 R.I. 250 , 172 A. 321, 1934 R.I. LEXIS 51 (1934).

Working of grade to legally established grade did not constitute a change of grade, even though 48 years had elapsed since the establishment. Rousseau v. Fortin, 54 R.I. 250 , 172 A. 321, 1934 R.I. LEXIS 51 (1934).

Established Grade.

This statute applies equally to change of grades established by surveyors prior to 1866 under their general authority. Aldrich v. Board of Aldermen, 12 R.I. 241 , 1878 R.I. LEXIS 72 (1878).

Council order approving a proposed grade but not directing the surveyor to work the grade did not establish a grade the change of which would be subject to the statute. Gardiner v. Johnston, 16 R.I. 94 , 12 A. 888, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 12 (1888).

In order for there to be a change of grade within the meaning of this section, the previous grade must have been established either by the surveyor or by the board of aldermen. Almy v. Coggeshall, 19 R.I. 549 , 36 A. 1124, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 82 (1896).

24-3-24. Establishment and curbing of sidewalks.

Whenever any highway is graded, or the grade thereof is changed, the town council may order sidewalks therein to be established, and the sidewalks to be curbed, upon like notice to the abutting proprietors of lands as provided in § 24-3-23 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 29; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 29; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 28; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 28; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-24 .

24-3-25. Liability for cost of curbs.

Whenever any highway shall be graded, and sidewalks established therein, and the sidewalks shall be ordered to be curbed as provided in § 24-3-24 , the owners of land abutting on the sidewalks shall pay the cost of the curbstones to be set against their respective lands.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 30; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 30; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 29; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 29; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-25 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 54.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Encumbrance.

Encumbrance arose against the land for curbing when set by competent authority even though cost had not been assessed nor a lien fixed. Amore v. Falco, 54 R.I. 41 , 169 A. 323, 1933 R.I. LEXIS 12 (1933).

24-3-26. Collection of curb costs.

The costs of the curbstones shall be ascertained by the surveyor of highways, and be by the surveyor submitted to and be approved by the town council, and then the surveyor of highways shall demand the costs of the abutting owner, and if the owner shall neglect or refuse to pay the costs, the surveyor of highways shall certify the costs so ascertained and approved, to the assessors of taxes for the town, and the assessors shall include the costs of the curbstones, which sum shall be included in the next assessment of taxes for the town against the land or the owner thereof.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 31; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 31; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 30; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 30; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-26 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Demand for Payment.

Averment of demand for payment before assessment for curbstones was necessary in action for breach of warranty against encumbrances. Bowers v. Narragansett Real Estate Co., 28 R.I. 329 , 67 A. 324, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 48 (1907).

Encumbrances.

Encumbrance arose against the land for curbing when set by competent authority, even though cost had not been assessed nor a lien fixed. Amore v. Falco, 54 R.I. 41 , 169 A. 323, 1933 R.I. LEXIS 12 (1933).

24-3-27. Settlement or appraisal of damages from change of grade.

Whenever any abutting owner shall deem himself or herself to be injured by any change in the grade of a highway, and the owner shall make a claim for compensation for the injury to the town council within forty (40) days after the change of grade shall have been completed, the town council shall appoint three (3) suitable and indifferent persons, not interested in the lands bordering on the highway the grade of which has been changed, who shall be engaged to the faithful discharge of their duties, and who shall go upon the highway when the grade thereof has been changed, and examine the highway, and the estate alleged to have been injured by changing the grade of the highway, and endeavor to agree with the owner of the estate as to the amount of damage sustained by the owner by means of the change of grade, and if they agree with the owner, they shall reduce the agreement to writing and report the agreement to the town council, which report shall be binding upon the owner and upon the town; but if they fail to agree with the owner as to the damage, they shall report the failure to the town council, whereupon the council, after notice to the owner and offering him or her an opportunity to be heard, shall proceed to appraise the damage done to the owner by means of the change of grade.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 32; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 32; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 31; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 31; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-27 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Alternative Remedies.

This section did not remove the common law liability of a city for flooding private property by a change in grade. Inman v. Tripp, 11 R.I. 520 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 34 (1877). But see Almy v. Coggeshall, 19 R.I. 549 , 36 A. 1124, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 82 (1896).

Appeal from the proceedings for change of grade is the exclusive remedy for damages therefrom and trespass on the case will not lie. Almy v. Coggeshall, 19 R.I. 549 , 36 A. 1124, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 82 (1896).

Establishment of Grade.

This section applies equally to change of grades established by surveyors prior to 1866 under their general authority. Aldrich v. Board of Aldermen, 12 R.I. 241 , 1878 R.I. LEXIS 72 (1878).

In order for abutting owner to be entitled to damages, the grade must have been previously legally established. Gardiner v. Johnston, 16 R.I. 94 , 12 A. 888, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 12 (1888).

Lessee.

Lessee by parol from year to year could claim damages under this section. Gilligan v. Board of Aldermen of Providence, 11 R.I. 258 , 1875 R.I. LEXIS 35 (1875).

Mandamus.

Where committee report showed neither agreement as to damages nor inability to agree, and where council had not entered decree appraising damages but had dismissed proceedings on ground of illegality, proper remedy of owner was not by appeal but by mandamus to compel recommitment or appointment of new committee. Whittier v. Town Council of N. Providence, 10 R.I. 266 , 1872 R.I. LEXIS 18 (1872).

Time of Filing Claim.

Town council cannot waive the forty-day limit on filing of claims. Anness v. Providence, 13 R.I. 17 , 1880 R.I. LEXIS 30 (1880).

Collateral References.

Closing street to facilitate traffic as unlawful interference with access of abutter. 73 A.L.R.2d 689.

Damage resulting from temporary conditions incident to public improvements or repairs as compensable taking. 23 A.L.R.4th 674.

Right of municipality or public to use of subsurface of street or highway for purposes other than sewers, pipes, conduits for wires, and the like, as affected by ownership of fee as between public and abutting owner. 11 A.L.R.2d 180.

24-3-28. Appeal of appraisals and assessments.

Every person having been notified as provided in § 24-3-23 , and having objected in writing to the action of the town council, on or before the day specified in the notice, who shall be aggrieved by any appraisal of damages made by any town council under the provisions of § 24-3-27 , or who shall be aggrieved by the assessment of any curbstone tax ordered as is provided in § 24-3-25 , may appeal therefrom according to the provisions of law with reference to appeals from town councils.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 33; C.P.A. 1905, § 1105; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 33; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 32; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 32; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-28 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 54.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Availability of Appeal.

Appeal would not lie where committee report showed neither agreement as to damages nor inability to agree and where council had not entered decree appraising damages but had dismissed proceedings on ground of illegality. Whittier v. Town Council of N. Providence, 10 R.I. 266 , 1872 R.I. LEXIS 18 (1872).

Remedy Exclusive.

Remedy given by this section is exclusive. Almy v. Coggeshall, 19 R.I. 549 , 36 A. 1124, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 82 (1896). But see Inman v. Tripp, 11 R.I. 520 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 34 (1877).

24-3-29. Judgment on appeal.

If the person appealing from any appraisal of damages made by the town council shall fail to have the damages increased on the appeal, the person shall pay the costs, and shall have judgment for the amount of damages awarded him or her, but if the damages are increased on the appeal, then the person shall have judgment for the damages and costs awarded to him or her, and execution may issue therefor; and every person appealing from any assessment of taxes for curbstones who shall fail to have the taxes reduced on appeal shall be adjudged to pay the costs of suit, and the collector of taxes may proceed to collect the taxes as if the appeal had not been taken, but if the appellant shall succeed in having the tax reduced, the appellant shall recover the costs, and the collector of taxes shall collect from the appellant only so much of the tax as shall have been found on appeal to be due from the appellant.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 34; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 34; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 33; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 33; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-29 .

24-3-30. Payment of damages — Action for recovery.

The town in which the change of grade of a street or highway shall be made shall be liable to any abutting proprietor whose estate therein shall be injured thereby, and the damages therefor, whether agreed on, or appraised, by the town council or by the court, shall be paid by the town treasurer of the town, against whom, if he or she refuse or neglect to pay the damages, an action may be had and maintained for the money by the person to whom the damages is due and payable.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 35; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 35; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 34; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 34; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-30 .

Collateral References.

Interest on damages for injury by change of grade for period before judgment. 96 A.L.R. 206, 36 A.L.R.2d 337, 36 A.L.R.2d 471.

Personal liability of highway officers for injury to property by change of grade, cuts, and fills. 90 A.L.R. 1490.

24-3-31. Islands exempt from provisions.

Hope, Patience, and Hog Islands are exempted from the operation of §§ 24-3-23 24-3-30 and §§ 24-5-1 24-5-27 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 36; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 36; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 35; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 35; G.L. 1956, § 24-3-31 .

Chapter 4 Federal Aid to Towns

24-4-1. Proposal to construct or reconstruct highway as federal aid project.

Any city or town, by resolution of its city or town council, may propose the construction or reconstruction of an appropriate street or highway within its municipal boundaries as a project eligible for participation in the benefits conferred by the Federal Aid Highway Act, 23 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., approved August 27, 1958, and all acts supplemental thereto and in amendment thereof, and may make appropriations therefor.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-1 .

Comparative Legislation.

Federal aid:

Conn. Gen. Stat., § 13a-6.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 81, § 30 et seq.

24-4-2. Contents of resolution.

  1. The resolution shall specifically describe the location of the proposed highway to be constructed or reconstructed; the total estimated costs of the project, and the type of the project.
  2. The resolution shall further contain notice that necessary funds have been lawfully appropriated by the city or town in an amount equal to its share of the total estimated cost of the proposed project, and that the appropriation is available for the purposes set forth in the resolution.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-2 .

24-4-3. Forwarding resolution to director — Jurisdiction of negotiations.

A certified copy of the resolution shall be forwarded by the city or town clerk to the state director of transportation, under whose jurisdiction all negotiations between the federal government, the state and the city or town shall be completed.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-3 .

24-4-4. Preparation and forwarding of federal forms.

Whenever the director of transportation shall give his or her approval to any proposed project, the director shall forthwith cause to be prepared the appropriate forms in a manner satisfactory to the federal highway administration. The forms when so prepared shall be forwarded to the federal highway administrator for disposition as provided by law.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-4 .

24-4-5. Federal aid highway matching account.

  1. The general treasurer shall maintain as hereinafter provided, a special account to be known as the federal aid highway matching account, which shall be a part of the state highway construction funds.
  2. Into the account shall be entered all money paid by any city or town on any project initiated and approved as herein provided for the purpose of matching federal grants and any state contribution to the projects.
  3. From the account shall be paid all debts, claims, and other obligations legally incurred in the performance of the projects, and all the payments shall be authorized by vouchers approved and signed by the director of transportation or his or her authorized agent.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-5 ; P.L. 1963, ch. 103, § 1.

24-4-6. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-6 ; Repealed by P.L. 1963, ch. 103, § 2, effective May 6, 1963.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-4-6 concerned project control accounts.

24-4-7. Refund of surplus contributions to cities and towns.

In the event the actual cost on any project is less than the estimated cost as provided in the project agreement, the general treasurer shall refund to any city or town any money remaining from the actual contribution of the city or town.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-7 .

24-4-8. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1947, ch. 1929, § 5; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2727, art. 1, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-4-8 ; P.L. 1963, ch. 103, § 3; Repealed by P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 3, effective July 1, 1988.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-4-8 concerned the required payment of city or town contribution.

Chapter 5 Maintenance of Town Highways

24-5-1. Duty of town to maintain highways.

  1. All highways, causeways, and bridges, except as provided by this chapter, lying and being within the bounds of any town, shall be kept in repair and amended, from time to time, so that the highways, causeways, and bridges may be safe and convenient for travelers with their teams, carts, and carriages at all seasons of the year, at the proper charge and expense of the town, under the care and direction of the town council of the town, provided that the state shall be responsible for the annual cleaning of all sidewalks on all state highways, causeways, and bridges.
  2. In addition, the surfaces of all highways and causeways shall be maintained in such a state of repair as to make them safe for bicycles.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-1 ; P.L. 1975, ch. 300, § 1; P.L. 1986, ch. 307, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

Cross References.

Housing projects, improvements in connection with, § 45-25-24 .

Islands exempt from provisions, § 24-3-31 .

Redevelopment project, installation or change of streets, §§ 45-32-15 , 45-32-42 .

Law Reviews.

2001 Survey of Rhode Island Law, see 7 Roger Williams U.L. Rev. 403 (2002).

Comparative Legislation.

Maintenance:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-36 et seq.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 84, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Construction With Other Statutes.

Because § 24-5-1.1 provides no standards for the repair or restoration of street excavations, it is clear that the legislature intended that the obligatory restoration by private excavators be regulated under the care and direction of the town council through ordinances and rules that municipalities were authorized to promulgate under § 24-5-1 . In re Ordinance Adopted by the City of Providence, 745 A.2d 769, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 32 (R.I. 2000).

— Cities.

This statute applies to cities. Eaton v. Follett, 48 R.I. 189 , 136 A. 437, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 40 (1927).

— Portion of Highway Covered.

Duty of maintenance with respect to a bridge on town boundary extended only to that portion of the bridge within the town. Haley v. Calef, 28 R.I. 332 , 67 A. 323, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 47 (1907).

City could contract for and, as against contractor, was liable for cost of paving portion of street for which street railway company was responsible under § 39-8-8 . Warren Bros. Co. v. Taylor, 29 R.I. 96 , 69 A. 303, 1908 R.I. LEXIS 23 (1908).

Duty under this section extends to sidewalks along state highways. But see Pullen v. State, 1998 (legislature clearly intended, by enacting §§ 24-8-6 and 24-8-9 , to provide state authority to enter into contracts regarding construction and maintenance of sidewalks and to fix the responsibilities of the state and municipalities in regard to the same). Child v. Greene, 51 R.I. 477 , 155 A. 664, 1931 R.I. LEXIS 87 (1931).

This section requires towns to maintain their highways in full, including the sidewalks. Barroso v. Pepin, 106 R.I. 502 , 261 A.2d 277 (1970). See also § 24-5-13 , which abrogates the doctrine of municipal immunity.

This section, a later-enacted special provision that applies only to employees of the legislative branch, takes precedence over § 36-4-59 , a conflicting, earlier-enacted statute of general application covering all state employees. Gibbons v. State, 694 A.2d 664, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 130 (R.I. 1997).

Subsections (a) and (c) (now see (f) and (i)) of § 31-1-23 in defining highway and roadway contemplate that a highway is wider than a roadway and includes the “entire width” between the boundary lines of the public way, including the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder; it therefore follows that if the vegetation obstructing the view of the motorist in the accident was located on the town’s property and within the boundary lines of the highway, then the town was under a duty to keep this portion of the highway “safe and convenient for travelers” pursuant to this section. O'Gara v. Ferrante, 690 A.2d 1354, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 80 (R.I. 1997).

Delegation of Powers.

Financial town meeting could not give special committee power to repair and improve roads. Arnold v. Tyler, 33 R.I. 150 , 80 A. 276, 1911 R.I. LEXIS 113 (1911).

Town was liable for purchase made by state employee acting on behalf of town’s agent in procuring material for a project falling within the town’s duty under this section. Coutu Lumber Co. v. Coffin, 59 R.I. 125 , 194 A. 715, 1937 R.I. LEXIS 146 (1937).

Town could not delegate to zoning board power to permit installation of gasoline pumps on the sidewalk. Di Palma v. Zoning Bd. of Review, 72 R.I. 286 , 50 A.2d 779, 1947 R.I. LEXIS 3 (1947).

Duty of Supervision.

City had duty to supervise independent contractor to avoid unreasonable delays in removal of obstructions made necessary by sewer project. Williams Bros. v. Tripp, 11 R.I. 447 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 22 (1877).

Town had duty to supervise work of independent contractor to insure that excavations were properly filled. Eaton v. Follett, 48 R.I. 189 , 136 A. 437, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 40 (1927).

Duty to Maintain Driftway.

Because the language found in the enactment equates driftways with highways, a city has and has always had a duty to maintain its driftway; thus, city’s assertion that because this section expressly mentions “causeways, highways, and bridges” as falling within a town’s maintenance obligations, the omission of the word “driftway” eliminates all maintenance obligations of the town with regard to this type of right-of-way was without merit. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Duty to Maintain Sidewalks.

Sections 24-8-6 and 24-8-9 give the state authority to enter into contracts to construct and maintain sidewalks along state roadways; consequently, the state’s execution of a construction and maintenance agreement with a city in which the state unequivocally agreed to maintain a sidewalk divested the city of any duty of maintenance and the city owed no duty to keep the sidewalk safe for pedestrian travel. Pullen v. State, 707 A.2d 686, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 25 (R.I. 1998).

Plaintiff’s suit against a town alleging she was injured due to a defective sidewalk was properly dismissed on summary judgment; as the description provided in her notice of claim excluded the actual area where the injury occurred, the notice did not fix the location in a reasonably sufficient manner under R.I. Gen. Laws § 45-15-9 . Carbone v. Ward, 56 A.3d 442, 2012 R.I. LEXIS 151 (R.I. 2012).

Evidence of Negligence.

Evidence of circular depression in middle of street, measuring 16 inches in diameter, sloping toward center, and three inches deep at center, was not sufficient to take question of negligence to jury. Patalano v. Cray, 49 R.I. 15 , 139 A. 471, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 6 (1927).

A difference in elevation of one and one-fourth inches between adjoining blocks in a sidewalk raised a question of fact as to the duty of the town. Quinn v. Stedman, 50 R.I. 153 , 146 A. 618, 1929 R.I. LEXIS 35 (1929).

Evidence, uncontradicted by town, that a series of large holes had existed in the street for as long as three years prior to the accident in which the nine-year-old bike rider was injured sufficiently presented the question of negligence on the part of the town as a question of fact properly within the function of the jury to decide. Ferretti v. Berry, 96 R.I. 67 , 189 A.2d 344, 1963 R.I. LEXIS 50 (1963).

Existence of Highway.

No appeal lies from an order under this section to open a highway but landowner who contests the existence of a highway has remedy in trespass quare clausum fregit. Knowles v. District of Narragansett, 23 R.I. 339 , 50 A. 386, 1901 R.I. LEXIS 142 (1901).

Evidence of petition for repair of road and of council action thereon was admissible on the issue of the existence of a public highway. Cole v. Barber, 33 R.I. 414 , 82 A. 129, 1912 R.I. LEXIS 97 (1912).

Laches.

Laches did not operate as a defense to plaintiffs-landowners’ lawsuit to compel town to open and repair a right-of-way where, although plaintiffs may have been negligent in failing to assert their rights sooner, the town was equally negligent in failing to fulfill its statutory obligation to maintain the right-of-way, and any prejudice the town suffered by repairing this driftway was prejudice occasioned by its own failure to act. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Notice of Defect.

Notice to a member of a town council of a defect in a highway was not notice to the town. Jordan v. Peckham, 19 R.I. 28 , 31 A. 305, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 22 (1895).

Knowledge by the surveyor as to road defects is notice to the town. Seamons v. Fitts, 20 R.I. 443 , 40 A. 3, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 86 (1898); Seamons v. Fitts, 21 R.I. 236 , 42 A. 863, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 15 (1899).

Surveyor who knew of excavation was bound to see to it that excavation was properly filled. Seamons v. Fitts, 20 R.I. 443 , 40 A. 3, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 86 (1898); Seamons v. Fitts, 21 R.I. 236 , 42 A. 863, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 15 (1899).

Because a municipality’s obligation to maintain its highways and bridges constitutes a governmental function, claims alleging failure or negligent performance of this function are subject to the 60-day notice requirement. Mercado v. City of Providence, 770 A.2d 445, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 114 (R.I. 2001).

Because R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-5-1 did not absolve the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (DOT) of the duty to keep roadways safe from the dangers presented by parallel-bar sewer grates, the trial court erred in granting the DOT’s motion for judgment as a matter of law where the DOT had notice 15 years earlier that parallel-bar sewer grates were dangerous to bicycles. Tedesco v. Connors, 871 A.2d 920, 2005 R.I. LEXIS 73 (R.I. 2005).

Scope of Statute.

The city did not owe the plaintiff a duty with respect to the condition of a street which had been abandoned and was now a private way, even though the city had posted a “Not a Through Street” sign instead of a “Not a Public Way” sign at its entrance. Di Cenzo v. Ruscetta, 510 A.2d 417, 1986 R.I. LEXIS 482 (R.I. 1986).

Standard of Care.

Town is not required to keep roads absolutely free from defects but only reasonably so. McCloskey v. Moies, 19 R.I. 297 , 33 A. 225, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 74 (1895); Patalano v. Cray, 49 R.I. 15 , 139 A. 471, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 6 (1927).

Town had no duty to keep highways safe for bicycles so long as the highways were safe for other travelers. Fox v. Clarke, 25 R.I. 515 , 57 A. 305, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 123 (1903); Patalano v. Cray, 49 R.I. 15 , 139 A. 471, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 6 (1927).

Jury might make a reasonable distinction between the care necessary for a country road and that necessary for a city street. Foley v. Ray, 27 R.I. 127 , 61 A. 50, 1905 R.I. LEXIS 53 (1905).

City was not required to make bridge safe for the passage of electric cars of a street railway company. Briden v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 27 R.I. 569 , 65 A. 315, 1906 R.I. LEXIS 59 (1906).

Question whether town was required to maintain bridge in such condition as to support ten-ton truck was mixed question of law and fact. Smith v. Howard, 42 R.I. 126 , 105 A. 649, 1919 R.I. LEXIS 17 (1919).

It is not incumbent upon a town to maintain its roads in order that they may be safe for travelers on bicycles as long as they are safe for travelers in ordinary vehicles; however, a bicycle rider is not barred from recovery where the defect causing his injury is such as would cause injury to one traveling in a vehicle comparable to a cart or carriage. Ferretti v. Berry, 96 R.I. 67 , 189 A.2d 344, 1963 R.I. LEXIS 50 (1963).

Traffic Control Signals and Devices.

In situations in which two lights control the same flow of traffic, each light functions as an independent and indispensable signal. Therefore, if one such light is not operating properly, the fact that the other light is operational will not excuse the disrepair of the malfunctioning equipment. Bierman v. Shookster, 590 A.2d 402, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 72 (R.I. 1991).

Work Authorized.

This section did not prevent town meeting from vesting in a special committee the power to build a new bridge on an existing highway. State ex rel. Walsh v. White, 16 R.I. 591 , 18 A. 179, 1889 R.I. LEXIS 62 (1889).

Council had authority under this section to direct work on the surface of a highway, not amounting to a change in grade, so as to carry off water accumulated on the highway and in the immediate vicinity thereof. Willoughby v. Allen, 25 R.I. 531 , 56 A. 1109, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 129 (1904).

Collateral References.

Damage resulting from temporary conditions incident to public improvements or repairs as compensable taking. 23 A.L.R.4th 674.

Duty of highway construction contractor to provide temporary way or detour around obstruction. 29 A.L.R.2d 876.

Government liability for injury or death resulting from design, construction, or failure to warn of narrow bridge. 2 A.L.R.4th 635.

Governmental liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or street intersection. 22 A.L.R.4th 624.

Governmental tort liability for injury allegedly caused by sidewalk or street defect. 58 A.L.R.4th 1197.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury, death, or property damage resulting from defect or obstruction in shoulder of street or highway. 19 A.L.R.4th 532.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from defect or obstruction on roadside parkway or parking strip. 98 A.L.R.3d 439.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from failure to repair pothole in surface of highway or street. 98 A.L.R.3d 101.

Personal injury liability of civil engineer for negligence in highway or bridge construction. 43 A.L.R.4th 911.

State and local liability for injury or death of bicyclist due to defect or obstruction in public bicycle path. 68 A.L.R.4th 204.

State and local governmental liability for injury or death of bicyclist due to defect or obstruction in public roadway or sidewalk. 12 A.L.R.6th 645.

24-5-1.1. Alteration of roadways.

  1. Any person, firm, or corporation including utilities and contractors who or that alter a roadway that is subject to the provisions of this chapter shall restore that portion of the roadway that was altered to the same or better condition that existed prior to alteration or as required in accordance with the state or municipal permit requirements. Repaving and repair of a roadway by a public utility or utility facility shall be in accordance with and subject to the provisions of chapter 2.2 of title 39.
  2. Municipalities shall adopt by ordinance standards for use of steel or other suitably manufactured plates on municipal roadways that shall, at a minimum, require compliance with the provisions specified in § 24-8-45 .

History of Section. P.L. 1992, ch. 335, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 170, § 2; P.L. 2019, ch. 184, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 234, § 2; P.L. 2019, ch. 253, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was amended by four acts (P.L. 2019, ch. 170, § 2; P.L. 2019, ch. 184, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 234, § 2; P.L. 2019, ch. 253, § 1) as passed by the 2019 General Assembly. Since the acts are not in conflict with each other, the section is set out as amended by all four acts.

P.L. 2019, ch. 170, § 2, and P.L. 2019, ch. 234, § 2 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2019, ch. 184, § 1, and P.L. 2019, ch. 253, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Legislative Intent.

Because this section provides no standards for the repair or restoration of street excavations, it is clear that the legislature intended that the obligatory restoration by private excavators be regulated under the care and direction of the town council through ordinances and rules that municipalities were authorized to promulgate under § 24-5-1 . In re Ordinance Adopted by the City of Providence, 745 A.2d 769, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 32 (R.I. 2000).

24-5-2. Division of towns into districts — Election and terms of surveyors.

The town council of each town shall divide the town into highway districts not exceeding four (4) in number, or shall constitute the entire town one highway district, and shall annually elect one surveyor of highways for each highway district, and fix his or her compensation; provided, however, that in the town of South Kingstown the powers and duties of surveyors of highways shall vest in the town council and the town shall not be required to elect surveyors of highways, and provided further that in the town of Smithfield there shall be one highway district which shall constitute the entire town, and one highway commissioner who shall be elected and be compensated and hold office as provided in Public Laws 1930, chapter 1675; the highway commissioner to perform the duties of highway surveyor in the town and have all the power and authority and be subject to all the duties now pertaining to the office of highway surveyors elected by the town councils under the laws of the state. Surveyors of highways so elected shall hold their offices until the next annual financial town meeting of the town and thereafter until their successors are elected. Vacancies occurring from any cause may be filled by the town council, and the town council may remove from office any surveyor of highways elected by them at their pleasure.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 2; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 2; P.L. 1929, ch. 1365, § 1; P.L. 1930, ch. 1675, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Admission Into Evidence.

Evidence of boundaries of highway districts, as defined by council, was admissible as evidence that named road was a public highway where record could be construed as naming highways to be maintained. Eddy v. Clarke, 38 R.I. 371 , 95 A. 851, 1915 R.I. LEXIS 75 (1915).

24-5-3. Annual town appropriation.

Each town, at some regularly called meeting of the electors thereof who are entitled to vote upon any proposition to impose a tax, shall annually appropriate such sum of money as the electors shall deem necessary for the maintenance and repair of its highways and bridges, and the sum so appropriated shall be included in the sum to be raised by the annual tax levied and assessed by the town for town purposes. In case any town shall fail to make an appropriation, the town council thereof shall make such expenditure upon the highways and bridges of the town as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of § 24-5-1 .

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 3; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 3; P.L. 1910, ch. 594, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-3 .

Cross References.

Power of towns to appropriate money, § 45-2-3 .

24-5-4. Appropriations expended under department of transportation — State aid.

Whenever any town shall make an annual appropriation equal to or in addition to the sum of twenty cents ($.20) on each one hundred dollars ($100) of the ratable property of such town, and whenever the electors at the meeting shall direct that the appropriation be expended under the care and direction of the department of transportation, the town shall be entitled to state aid in the care and maintenance of its public highways, causeways, and bridges, other than state highways, in the following amount: A sum of money not exceeding one-fifth (1/5) of the money appropriated as aforesaid by any town, out of any money specifically appropriated by the general assembly to be used and expended by the department of transportation for the repair, care, and maintenance of public highways, causeways, and bridges in the respective towns; and the state controller is hereby authorized and directed to draw his or her order upon the general treasurer for the money so appropriated, upon proper vouchers signed by the director of transportation. Whenever the electors at the meeting shall direct the appropriation as aforesaid to be expended under the direction of the department of transportation, the town treasurer of the town shall pay such highway bills for highway expenditures in the town as are properly audited by the director of transportation, not exceeding the amount of the town’s appropriation.

History of Section. G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 3, as enacted by P.L. 1910, ch. 594, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 3; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, §§ 65, 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-4 .

Cross References.

Appropriations for maintenance of state highways, § 24-8-17 et seq.

Department of transportation, maintenance and construction of roads, § 37-5-2 .

Widening of state highways at town expense, § 24-8-4 .

24-5-5. Allotments to highway districts — Supervision of expenditures — Rates of compensation.

Town councils shall determine and allot the proportion of the annual appropriation for the maintenance and repair of highways and bridges, which shall be expended within the limits of each highway district in their respective towns, and so much of the appropriation as shall be expended under their care and direction, or under the care and direction of a committee or committees of their own members appointed by them for that purpose. They shall also fix the rate of compensation to be paid for personnel, teams, road making machinery, and materials to be employed or used in their respective towns.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 4; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 4; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-5 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Liability.

Approval by council of bills incurred in the execution of a particular project constituted ratification of the project so as to bind the town for negligence in the execution thereof. Willoughby v. Allen, 25 R.I. 531 , 56 A. 1109, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 129 (1904).

After complete execution of the contract, town would be liable on count of quantum valebant for use of road machinery on project that it could have undertaken, even though town did not give express authority for the contract. Pocasset Ice Co. v. Burton, 35 R.I. 57 , 85 A. 277, 1912 R.I. LEXIS 91 (1912).

24-5-6. Expenditures by contract — Unexpended funds.

Whenever any town council shall be of the opinion that it is preferable to do so, they may provide for the expenditure by contract of a portion or all of the money allotted to be expended in any one or more highway districts; and if the work so done by contract shall extend into two (2) or more highway districts, they may determine what proportion of the cost thereof shall be paid from the money allotted to each of the highway districts. All money so allotted and not expended by contract shall, when expended, be expended by the surveyor of highways of the district to which it was allotted.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 5; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-6 .

24-5-7. Special appropriations for particular projects.

Whenever any town shall make, in addition to its annual appropriation for the maintenance and repair of its highways and bridges, a special appropriation for the building or repair of any particular highway or bridge or other highway work, and shall not provide that the appropriation be expended by contract, the town council of the town shall determine whether the appropriation shall be so expended; and if not expended by contract, it shall be expended by the surveyor of highways of the district within which the work is to be done.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 6; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 6; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-7 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Town Meeting.

Council was bound by direction of financial town meeting that an appropriation for permanent improvements be expended by contract. Quinn v. Barber, 31 R.I. 538 , 77 A. 1003, 1910 R.I. LEXIS 90 (1910).

24-5-8. General duties of surveyors of highways.

Every surveyor of highways shall execute the directions given to the surveyor by the town council or the committee thereof as provided for in this chapter, and shall purchase and use such materials and employ such personnel, teams, and road making apparatus as may be necessary therefor at the rates of compensation fixed by the town council. The surveyor shall keep himself or herself informed as to the condition of all the highways in the surveyor’s district, taking particular care to do so immediately after all storms and freshets, and shall seasonably communicate such information to the town council or to the committee thereof having care of his or her district; and it shall be the surveyor’s duty, in case of sudden and unforeseen damage to any highway or bridge, to immediately repair the damage at the expense of the town so that it will be safe and passable, without instruction or direction from the town council or committee.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 7; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 7; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-8 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

Cross References.

Exemption of highway workers from traffic regulations, § 31-12-5 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Binding on Town.

Council committee on highways may bind town by its directions to surveyor. Willoughby v. Allen, 25 R.I. 531 , 56 A. 1109, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 129 (1904).

Instructions to Surveyor.

Council may give verbal and informal instructions to surveyor. Willoughby v. Allen, 25 R.I. 531 , 56 A. 1109, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 129 (1904).

Council committee on highways may give verbal and informal instructions to surveyor. Willoughby v. Allen, 25 R.I. 531 , 56 A. 1109, 1904 R.I. LEXIS 129 (1904).

Notice of Defects.

Knowledge by the surveyor as to road defects is notice to the town. Seamons v. Fitts, 20 R.I. 443 , 40 A. 3, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 86 (1898); Seamons v. Fitts, 21 R.I. 236 , 42 A. 863, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 15 (1899).

Unauthorized Acts.

Town was not liable for acts of surveyor that had not been authorized by town or council and that neither town nor council could lawfully have authorized. Briggs v. Allen, 24 R.I. 80 , 52 A. 679, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 20 (1902).

24-5-9. Removal of obstructions by surveyors.

Surveyors of highways may cut down, lop off, dig up, and remove all sorts of trees, bushes, stones, fences, rails, gates, bars, enclosures, or other matter or thing that shall in any manner straighten, obstruct, or incommode any highway; provided, that nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to authorize any surveyor, except under the direction of the town council, to cut down or destroy, or other than in a reasonable and proper manner, to lop off or trim up any shade or ornamental tree so planted or maintained by any adjacent owner or occupant upon or near the side of any highways as not to incommode the traveled path.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 8; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 8; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-9 .

24-5-10. Taking of road materials from adjoining land.

Any surveyor of highways may, with the consent of the town council or committee thereof having care and direction of his or her district, for the purpose of obtaining materials for repairing any highway, enter upon and dig for stone, gravel, clay, marl, sand, or earth in any adjoining land not forming a part of the messuage connected with any dwelling house, or not used as a cemetery or burial ground or otherwise appropriated to the burial of the dead; and may remove the material thus dug up to a place or places in the highways for the repair and amendment thereof as the surveyor shall deem necessary; provided, that land which is platted in house lots, and the plat thereof recorded in the land records of the town where it lies, shall not be so entered upon.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 9; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 9; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 9; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-10 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Removal of Trees.

Trees removed remain the property of the landowner. Tucker v. Eldred, 6 R.I. 404 , 1860 R.I. LEXIS 4 (1860).

24-5-11. Damage in removing obstructions or materials.

All claims for damages for any acts done or materials taken under §§ 24-5-9 and 24-5-10 shall be claims against the town under which the surveyor of highways acted.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 10; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 10; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 10; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 10; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-11 .

Cross References.

Actions against towns, § 45-15-5 et seq.

24-5-12. Fine for neglect to keep highways in repair.

Every town which shall neglect to keep in good repair its highways and bridges shall be fined not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500), and execution shall issue therefor against the town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 11; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 11; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 11; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 11; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-12 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

State’s Liability.

This section and § 24-5-13 specifically impose liability on towns for personal injuries resulting from neglect to keep town highways in repair. There are no comparable statutes applicable to the state’s duty as to state highways under former § 24-8-14 . Knudsen v. Hall, 490 A.2d 976, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 481 (R.I. 1985).

24-5-13. Liability of cities and towns for injuries from defective roads.

  1. The cities and towns shall also be liable to all persons who may in any way suffer injury to their persons or property by reason of any neglect, to be recovered in a civil action except as provided in subsection (b).
  2. If any person shall incur damage to his or her motor vehicle by reason of a pothole on any municipal highway, causeway, street or bridge which damage would not have occurred without the existence of the pothole, he or she may recover from the municipality the amount of damages sustained up to and not more than the sum of three hundred dollars ($300). Provided, however, that the municipality had reasonable notice of the pothole, or may have had notice thereof by the exercise of proper care and diligence on its part, and a reasonable opportunity to repair the pothole. All claims shall be made within a period of seven (7) days from the date on which the damage was sustained by filing a written report in a manner prescribed by the municipality. In no instance, however, shall any claim for damage so caused to a motor vehicle registered in a foreign state be considered unless that state has a similar statute affording similar protection to persons owning motor vehicles registered in this state.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 12; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 12; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 12; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-13 ; P.L. 1994, ch. 104, § 1.

Cross References.

Action against town, § 45-15-8 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Adjacent Property.

Town was not liable for injury sustained by traveler on the highway from the falling of a signboard adjacent to the highway. Taylor v. Peckham, 8 R.I. 349 , 1866 R.I. LEXIS 17 (1866).

Boundary Bridges.

Plaintiff in action for injuries on a bridge joining two towns could join both towns as defendants but must prove in which town the defect existed. Haley v. Calef, 28 R.I. 332 , 67 A. 323, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 47 (1907).

Construction of Statute.

The liability imposed by § 24-5-12 and this section is in derogation of the common law and therefore must be strictly construed. Wroblewski v. Clark, 88 R.I. 235 , 146 A.2d 164, 1958 R.I. LEXIS 118 (1958).

Where the city was allegedly negligent in failing to install a stop sign at an intersection where the injured party was injured in a car accident, the city was immune from liability under the public duty doctrine, in part, because no statutory duty or liability had been imposed on the city; R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-5-13 imposed liability for failure to maintain roads, not for placement of traffic signs. Hudson v. City of Providence, 830 A.2d 1105, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 34 (R.I. 2003).

Contributing Causes.

Town could be held liable even though condition for which it was not responsible contributed to the cause of the accident. McCloskey v. Moies, 19 R.I. 297 , 33 A. 225, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 74 (1895).

Duties Mandatory.

The duties imposed by §§ 24-5-1 , 24-5-12 and this section are mandatory. Wroblewski v. Clark, 88 R.I. 235 , 146 A.2d 164, 1958 R.I. LEXIS 118 (1958).

Effect.

This section sets out a waiver of governmental immunity; it does not set forth the procedures for bringing an action against a municipality. Natareno v. Martin, 694 A.2d 749, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 167 (R.I. 1997).

Evidence of Existence of Highway.

This section did not apply to a driveway in a public park without a showing that such driveway was a highway. Blair v. Granger, 24 R.I. 17 , 51 A. 1042, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 6 (1902).

Evidence of petition for repair of road and of council action thereon was admissible on the issue of the existence of a public highway. Cole v. Barber, 33 R.I. 414 , 82 A. 129, 1912 R.I. LEXIS 97 (1912).

Legislative Intent.

The legislature would not have imposed liability on a municipality for damages sustained by a driver or pedestrian injured as the result of the failure of a utility or other private excavator to properly restore a roadway unless it had intended that communities be given sufficient authority to regulate the manner in which streets are repaired and restored. In re Ordinance Adopted by the City of Providence, 745 A.2d 769, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 32 (R.I. 2000).

Loss of Trade.

City was liable for loss of trade and inconvenience suffered by abutting owner because of unreasonable delay in removing obstructions made necessary by sewer project. Williams Bros. v. Tripp, 11 R.I. 447 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 22 (1877).

Municipal Immunity Abrogated.

This section abrogates the doctrine of municipal immunity where travelers sustained injuries by reason of the town’s failure to comply with § 24-5-1 . Barroso v. Pepin, 106 R.I. 502 , 261 A.2d 277, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 951 (1970).

Other Parties at Fault.

City was liable for injuries caused by unreasonable delays by independent contractor. Williams Bros. v. Tripp, 11 R.I. 447 , 1877 R.I. LEXIS 22 (1877).

That obstruction was created by a fire district was no defense in an action under this section where the town had notice of the obstruction. Foley v. Ray, 27 R.I. 127 , 61 A. 50, 1905 R.I. LEXIS 53 (1905).

City was liable for injury caused by failure of independent contractor to fill excavation even though city had no actual notice of such failure. Eaton v. Follett, 48 R.I. 189 , 136 A. 437, 1927 R.I. LEXIS 40 (1927).

Standard of Care.

Question whether highway was reasonably safe and convenient was for jury. McCloskey v. Moies, 19 R.I. 297 , 33 A. 225, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 74 (1895); Smith v. Howard, 42 R.I. 126 , 105 A. 649, 1919 R.I. LEXIS 17 (1919).

Question whether town was required to maintain bridge so as to support ten-ton truck was for jury. Smith v. Howard, 42 R.I. 126 , 105 A. 649, 1919 R.I. LEXIS 17 (1919).

Evidence of a different in elevation of one and one-fourth inches between adjoining blocks in a sidewalk was sufficient to take the question of negligence to the jury. Quinn v. Stedman, 50 R.I. 153 , 146 A. 618, 1929 R.I. LEXIS 35 (1929).

State’s Liability.

Section 24-5-12 and this section specifically impose liability on towns for personal injuries resulting from neglect to keep town highways in repair. Knudsen v. Hall, 490 A.2d 976, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 481 (R.I. 1985).

Travelers Protected.

Bicycle rider could recover for defect that would have rendered highway unsafe for other travelers. Fox v. Clarke, 25 R.I. 515 , 57 A. 305, 1903 R.I. LEXIS 123 (1903).

Collateral References.

Governmental liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or street intersection. 22 A.L.R.4th 624.

Governmental tort liability for injury allegedly caused by sidewalk or street defect. 58 A.L.R.4th 1197.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury, death, or property damage resulting from defect or obstruction in shoulder of street or highway. 19 A.L.R.4th 532.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from defect or obstruction on roadside parkway or parking strip. 98 A.L.R.3d 439.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from failure to repair pothole in surface of highway or street. 98 A.L.R.3d 101.

Personal injury liability of civil engineer for negligence in highway or bridge construction. 43 A.L.R.4th 911.

State and local liability for injury or death of bicyclist due to defect or obstruction in public bicycle path. 68 A.L.R.4th 204.

Washouts, liability for negligence in repairing. 2 A.L.R. 718.

24-5-14. Snow and ice removal.

The several towns shall provide by ordinance in a manner and under such penalties as they may deem expedient, for removing snow from the public highways so as to render the public highways passable with teams, sleds, and sleighs; but nothing contained in this chapter shall be so construed as to render any town or city liable for any injury to person or property caused by snow or ice obstructing any or any part of the highways therein, unless notice in writing of the existence of the particular obstruction shall have been given to the surveyor of highways within whose district the obstruction exists, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the injury was caused, and the town or surveyor shall not thereupon within twenty-four (24) hours of notification have commenced the removal of the obstruction, or caused any sidewalk which may have been obstructed by ice to be rendered passable, by spreading ashes or other like substances thereon. Whenever any highway is blocked up or encumbered with snow, the surveyor shall cause so much thereof to be removed or trod down as to render the highway passable.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 13; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 13; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 13; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 13; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-14 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Artificial Obstructions.

The notice required by this section applied to obstructions caused by artificial means as well as by natural means. Winsor v. Tripp, 12 R.I. 454 , 1879 R.I. LEXIS 55 (1879).

Notice Requirement.

The trial justice properly ruled that the notice required under this section was a condition precedent that must be complied with before plaintiff could bring her tort action against the municipality. Hareld v. Napolitano, 615 A.2d 1015, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 203 (R.I. 1992).

This section does not mandate that the claimant be the person who gives notice to the city. The sole requisite is that notice must have been given of the obstruction or dangerous situation by someone at least 24 hours before the time of the injury. Hareld v. Napolitano, 615 A.2d 1015, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 203 (R.I. 1992).

The notice requirement in this section does not amount to an unconstitutional denial of access to the courts in violation of R.I. Const. art. 1, § 5 . Art. I, sec. 5 should not be interpreted to bar the Legislature from enacting any laws that may limit a party from bringing a claim in Rhode Island courts, and notice requirements that are imposed only on victims of governmental tortfeasors are rationally based and constitutionally valid. Hareld v. Napolitano, 615 A.2d 1015, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 203 (R.I. 1992).

Other Defects in Highway.

The provision requiring notice of obstruction does not apply to a case where ice would not have formed but for a defect in the highway. McCloskey v. Moies, 19 R.I. 297 , 33 A. 225, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 74 (1895).

In the absence of previous written notice, city was not liable for injury caused by ice unless on a showing that defect causing ice to form would have been dangerous even without the ice. Allen v. Cook, 21 R.I. 525 , 45 A. 148, 1900 R.I. LEXIS 5 (1900); Kulish v. Cray, 52 R.I. 212 , 159 A. 831, 1932 R.I. LEXIS 32 (1932).

Restriction of Immunity.

In enacting this section the legislature did not intend to establish any separate and distinct remedy applicable to snow and ice cases, but did intend to restrict the availability of § 45-15-8 in such cases. Barroso v. Pepin, 106 R.I. 502 , 261 A.2d 277, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 951 (1970).

In an action for personal injury suffered by plaintiff in a fall on a city sidewalk in which the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and then plaintiff raised the question as to the constitutionality of the notice requirement of this section, the court will not pass on the constitutionality of an act where the question was not raised with particularity in the trial court. Vigneau v. La Salle, 111 R.I. 179 , 300 A.2d 477, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1194 (1973).

Collateral References.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from snow or ice on surface of highway or street. 97 A.L.R. 3d 11.

24-5-15. Penalty for failure to remove snow.

If the snow is allowed to remain in any public highway in any town so as to obstruct any person in passing along the highway with his or her team, sled, or sleigh, for twenty-four (24) hours after the highway shall become obstructed, the town shall be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100); but nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to subject any town to the fine provided for in this section if the surveyor of highways, or some other person duly authorized for that purpose by the town, with the power vested in him or her by the laws of the state, shall have commenced the removal of the obstructions within the time provided for in this section, and shall within three (3) days remove the obstructions.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 14; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 14; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 14; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 14; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-15 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

24-5-16. Diversion of water to damage of individuals prohibited.

No surveyor of highways shall cause any watercourse in any highway to be so conveyed as to incommode any person’s land, house, store, shop or other building, or to obstruct any person in the prosecution of his or her business or occupation, without the consent or approbation of the town council of the town, signified in writing to the surveyor.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 15; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 15; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 15; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 15; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-16 .

24-5-17. Complaint and alteration of watercourse.

Any person who may consider himself or herself aggrieved by a watercourse may complain to the town council; and the council on receiving his or her complaint and examining into the circumstances of the complaint, shall, if they think reasonable, direct the surveyor to alter the watercourse in such manner as they shall think proper.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 16; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 16; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 16; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 16; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-17 .

24-5-18. Bridges and fences on artificial watercourses along preexisting highways.

Whenever any artificial watercourse has been or shall be made under, through or by the side of any highway previously existing, the proprietors or occupants of the watercourse shall make and maintain all necessary bridges over the watercourse and all fences which may be necessary along the side of the watercourse.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 17; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 17; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 17; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 17; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-18 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Private Turnpike.

Owners of watercourse were not liable for maintenance of bridge where watercourse was made under a preexisting private turnpike but before the turnpike became a public highway. North Providence v. Dyerville Mfg. Co., 13 R.I. 45 , 1880 R.I. LEXIS 37 (1880).

Collateral References.

Measure and elements of damages for injury to bridge. 31 A.L.R.5th 171.

24-5-19. Bridges and fences along preexisting watercourses.

Whenever any highway has been or shall be laid out, over, or by the side of any artificial watercourse made previously to the laying out of the highway, the town laying out the highway shall make and maintain the necessary bridges over the watercourse and the fences along the side of the watercourse as may be needed for the safety of travelers.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 18; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 18; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 18; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 18; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-19 .

Cross References.

Repair and reconstruction of bridge used by street railway, § 39-2-6 .

Collateral References.

Cost of constructing and maintaining a bridge as a necessary expense. 113 A.L.R. 1210.

Duty and liability as to construction or maintenance of bridge as respects weight of load. 68 A.L.R. 605.

Prohibition to control action of administrative officers in matters relating to bridges. 115 A.L.R. 23, 159 A.L.R. 627.

24-5-20. Bridges on boundary lines.

All public bridges, except such as are part of the state highway system, on the dividing lines between towns shall be established and kept in repair at the expense of the towns adjoining the bridges; and every public bridge except such as are part of the state highway system on the dividing line between this state and the adjoining states shall be established and kept in repair, on the part of this state, at the expense of the town adjoining the bridge.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 19; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 19; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 19; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 19; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-20 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

Town’s duty of maintenance extended only to that portion of boundary line bridge which lay within the town. Haley v. Calef, 28 R.I. 332 , 67 A. 323, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 47 (1907).

24-5-21. Penalty for neglect of boundary line bridge.

If any town adjoining any boundary line bridge shall refuse or neglect to keep in good repair the part of the bridge within and next adjoining the line of the town, the town so neglecting or refusing shall be fined not less than twenty dollars ($20.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), and execution shall issue for the amount of the fine and costs against the town; but nothing contained in this section shall be so construed as to impair any agreement made between any towns relative to the supporting and repairing of bridges.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 20; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 20; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 20; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 20; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-21 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Scope of Liability.

Civil liability of town for defects in boundary line bridge extends only to that portion of the bridge lying within the town. Haley v. Calef, 28 R.I. 332 , 67 A. 323, 1907 R.I. LEXIS 47 (1907).

24-5-22. New highway using existing bridge.

Whenever any highway has been or shall be laid out over any tract or parcel of land used at the time of the laying out as a highway, the laying out shall not be deemed or construed to affect or in any way alter the rights or duties of the town, or any individual, as to the maintenance of bridges over any part of the new highway, which so nearly coincides with the old highway as not to require the removal of the bridges or the building of them in a different place from where they previously stood.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 22; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 22; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 21; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 21; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-22 .

24-5-23. Bridges and culverts built by adjoining landowners.

Any person owning land adjoining any public highway may build such bridges or culverts over the ditches, which may be made in the highway for the passage of water, as may be necessary to render the passage from the land to the highway safe and convenient; and no bridge or culvert shall be altered, removed, or disturbed by any person, except under the direction of the town council of the town where the bridge or culvert may be situated, or of some person by them appointed for that purpose.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 23; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 23; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 22; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 22; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-23 .

Cross References.

Ditches and drains, § 46-20-1 et seq.

24-5-24. Undermining of walls and fences.

No surveyor of highways shall remove the earth so near to any wall or fence erected upon or without the limits of a highway as to undermine or overthrow the wall or fence, unless the undermining or overthrowing shall be absolutely necessary for the security or convenience of the public; and, in that case, the repairs shall be made under the supervision of the town council, or of some person appointed by them; and the town shall be at the expense of repairing or resetting the wall or fence removed.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 24; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 24; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 23; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 23; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-24 .

24-5-25. Compensation of surveyors.

Surveyors of highways shall be paid out of the town treasury at the rate of two dollars ($2.00) per day for all the time necessarily spent in the discharge of the duties of their office, whenever no other mode or amount of compensation shall have been provided by any town or town council.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 25; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 25; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 24; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 24; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-25 .

24-5-26. Penalty for neglect by surveyors.

Every surveyor of highways who shall neglect the duties of his or her trust shall forfeit twenty dollars ($20.00) for every neglect, to be recovered in the name of the town treasurer to the use of the town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 26; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 26; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 25; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 25; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-26 .

Cross References.

Suspension or removal of surveyor by town council, § 45-5-8 .

24-5-27. Rights of cities unimpaired.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed to affect the right of any city to maintain and repair its highways in the manner now provided by law for that city.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 72, § 27; G.L. 1909, ch. 83, § 27; G.L. 1923, ch. 96, § 26; G.L. 1938, ch. 73, § 26; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-27 .

24-5-28. Determination of places where guideposts necessary.

The several town councils shall, at their meeting held next after the first day of October in each year, determine the corners and angles of all roads within their respective towns at which it shall be necessary to erect and maintain guideposts, and shall keep a record of their decision among the records of their proceedings.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 7; P.L. 1897, ch. 449, § 1; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 7; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-28 .

24-5-29. Failure to determine places for guideposts.

Every town council which shall, at their meeting held next after the first day of October in any year, neglect or refuse to determine upon proper places at which guideposts shall be erected and maintained, shall be fined five dollars ($5.00) for every month they shall so neglect or refuse.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 11; P.L. 1897, ch. 449, § 2; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 11; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 11; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-29 .

24-5-30. Erection of guideposts — Specifications.

The town councils shall cause to be erected and maintained, at the several corners and angles as determined pursuant to § 24-5-28 , substantial posts not less than eight feet (8´) high, upon the upper end of which shall be placed a board upon which shall be plainly and legibly painted the name of the next town, with the other noted town or place as may be judged most expedient for the direction of travelers, to which each of the roads may lead, together with the number of miles to the next town; and also the figure of a hand, with the forefinger thereof pointing toward the town or place to which the road may lead.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 8; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-30 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

24-5-31. Substitutes for guideposts.

The inhabitants of any town may agree upon some suitable substitute for the guideposts, and appoint any proper person to superintend the erection and support of the guideposts.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 9; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 9; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-31 .

24-5-32. Penalty for failure to maintain guideposts.

Every town which shall neglect or refuse to keep, at all times, guideposts erected and maintained at the places and in the manner above prescribed, shall be fined three dollars ($3.00) for every month it shall so neglect or refuse.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 10; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 10; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 10; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-32 .

24-5-33. Injury to guideposts.

Every person who shall injure, mar or deface any guidepost or its substitute, agreed upon as provided in § 24-5-31 , or board which shall be set up as is provided by this chapter, shall be fined not exceeding twenty dollars ($20.00) nor less than five dollars ($5.00) to the use of the town.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 12; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 12; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-33 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 56.

Cross References.

Injuries to road signs, penalty, § 11-22-2 .

24-5-34. Jamestown and New Shoreham exempt.

The provisions of §§ 24-5-28 24-5-33 shall not apply to the towns of Jamestown and New Shoreham.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 74, § 13; G.L. 1909, ch. 87, § 13; G.L. 1923, ch. 99, § 13; G.L. 1938, ch. 83, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-5-34 .

24-5-35. Pothole hotline.

The department of transportation is hereby authorized and directed to establish a toll-free telephone hotline (1-800-pothole or 1-888-pothole, if available) for the purpose of reporting potholes to the state. If the department determines that a given pothole is not on a state highway but on a city or town highway, it shall make that information available to the respective municipality.

History of Section. P.L. 2016, ch. 504, § 1.

Chapter 6 Abandonment by Towns

24-6-1. Order of abandonment — Reversion of title — Notice.

  1. Whenever, by the judgment of the town council of any town, a highway or driftway in the town, or any part of either, has ceased to be useful to the public, the town council of the town is authorized so to declare it by an order or decree that shall be final and conclusive; and, thereupon, the title of the land upon which the highway or driftway or part thereof existed shall revert to its owner and the town shall be no longer liable to repair the highway or driftway; provided, however, that the town council shall cause a sign to be placed at each end of the highway or driftway, having thereon the words “Not a public highway,” and after the entry of the order or decree, shall also cause a notice thereof to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed in English, at least once each week for three (3) successive weeks in a newspaper circulated within the city or town and a further and personal notice shall be served upon every owner of land abutting upon that part of the highway or driftway that has been abandoned who is known to reside within this state. Nothing contained in this chapter shall, in any manner, affect any private right-of-way over the land so adjudged to be useless as a highway or driftway if the right had been acquired before the taking of the land for a highway or driftway. Provided, however, that the town of Coventry and any community with a population of not less than one hundred thousand (100,000), receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value; and provided, further, that the town of North Providence, upon receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner, at fair market value; and provided further, that the town of New Shoreham, upon receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value; and provided, further, that the town of Barrington, upon receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value; and provided, further, that the city of Cranston, upon receipt of a request for abandonment of a highway or driftway within the city of Cranston, where the sale of the highway or driftway to an abutting owner would result in the creation of a new lot that would be in compliance with the minimum-area requirement for construction of a building that is a permitted use, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value; and provided, further, that the city of Warwick, upon receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value; and provided, further, that the town of Middletown, upon receiving a request for the abandonment of a highway or driftway from an abutting property owner, may sell the highway or driftway to the abutting owner at fair market value.
  2. Provided, further, that nothing in this section shall apply to private ways regardless of their use or maintenance thereof by any municipal corporation.

History of Section. G.L. 1896, ch. 71, § 30; P.L. 1903, ch. 1106, § 2; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 30; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 30; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 30; G.L. 1956, § 24-6-1 ; P.L. 1967, ch. 214, § 1; P.L. 1975, ch. 74, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 667, § 1; P.L. 1992, ch. 55, § 1; P.L. 1992, ch. 298, § 1; P.L. 1996, ch. 210, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 57; P.L. 2007, ch. 260, § 1; P.L. 2007, ch. 366, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 33, § 1; P.L. 2009, ch. 73, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 46, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 52, § 1; P.L. 2021, ch. 194, § 1, effective July 8, 2021; P.L. 2021, ch. 195, § 1, effective July 8, 2021.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2014, ch. 46, § 1, and P.L. 2014, ch. 52, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2021, ch. 194, § 1, and P.L. 2021, ch. 195, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Severability.

P.L. 2014, ch. 46, § 2 provides: “If any provision of this act, or the application thereof, to the town of Barrington, or to any person or circumstances, is deemed invalid for any reason, the remainder of this act, or the application of such provision to said town or other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and, to this end, the provisions of this act are declared to be severable.”

P.L. 2014, ch. 52, § 2 provides: “If any provision of this act, or the application thereof, to the town of Barrington, or to any person or circumstances, is deemed invalid for any reason, the remainder of this act, or the application of such provision to said town or other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and, to this end, the provisions of this act are declared to be severable.”

Comparative Legislation.

Abandonment of highways:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-43.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 82, § 30.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Abandonment by Town Not Shown.

Where landowner never granted town an easement to use the driftway and the abandonment proceeding did not go forward; the town never posted notice on the driftway concerning its abandonment, nor did it publish notice in a newspaper; and, landowners-petitioners never collected damages as a result of the conditional abandonment, the town never abandoned the driftway. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Because a street had not been accepted as a public way, abandonment by a town was not required; the street was included in the original plat of the area, but the town never developed or accepted it, and there was no evidence of use by the general public or any suggestion of the public’s right to use the street as a public way. Town of Barrington v. Williams, 972 A.2d 603, 2009 R.I. LEXIS 82 (R.I. 2009).

In abutters’ action against a city to clear title to a portion of a street extension, a trial court properly found in favor of the city because the only manner the city could abandon the extension was through the Abandonment Statute, R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-6-1 , the city had not complied with § 24-6-1 , and, therefore, the city had not abandoned the extension. Reagan v. City of Newport, 43 A.3d 33, 2012 R.I. LEXIS 52 (R.I. 2012).

Due Process.

Permanent closing of highway to all through traffic without taking procedure prescribed by this chapter amounted to a taking of abutting owner’s property without due process of law. Wolfe v. Providence, 77 R.I. 192 , 74 A.2d 843, 1950 R.I. LEXIS 64 (1950).

The notice provisions contained in this and the following section are sufficient under due process. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

— Hearing.

The ruling that the taking of private property by eminent domain does not trigger the due process clause prior to the taking and that therefore no hearing is required prior to taking also applies to abandonment: plaintiffs are limited by the statutory scheme in their right to a pre-abandonment hearing. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

— Personal Notice.

This section clearly requires personal notice of an abandonment only if a highway abutter owns land abutting upon that part of the highway which it is proposed to abandon. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

Property owners who attended the meeting where a town council voted to abandon a street had actual notice of the decision, and the decision was not void because the owners were not served with personal notice of the decision, pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-6-2(a). Gardner v. Cumberland Town Council, 826 A.2d 972, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 176 (R.I. 2003).

Rights of Abutting Owner.

Fee is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to belong to owner of abutting land on the abandonment of portion of highway. Davis v. Girard, 74 R.I. 125 , 59 A.2d 366, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 53 (1948).

Usefulness to Public.

Under previous version of this section council’s decree was not conclusive that highway had ceased to be useful to public. State v. Cumberland, 7 R.I. 75 , 1861 R.I. LEXIS 20 (1861).

The determination of the question of whether a highway “has ceased to be useful to the public” is the exercise of purely legislative discretion which the supreme court will not review by writ of certiorari. Godena v. Gobeille, 88 R.I. 121 , 143 A.2d 290, 1958 R.I. LEXIS 89 (1958).

Collateral References.

Alteration or relocation of street or highway as discontinuance of parts not included. 158 A.L.R. 543.

Boundaries, effect of vacation of highway before conveyance on question whether description with reference to highway carries title to center or side of highway. 49 A.L.R.2d 982.

Mandamus to compel improvement or repair of street or highway as affected by its abandonment. 46 A.L.R. 266.

Necessity for adhering to statutory procedure prescribed for vacation or discontinuance of street or highway. 175 A.L.R. 760.

Private easement in way vacated, abandoned, or closed by public. 150 A.L.R. 644.

Reversion of title upon vacation of public street or highway. 18 A.L.R. 1008, 70 A.L.R. 564.

State highway, vacation of street or road constituting part of. 144 A.L.R. 311.

Subdivision maps or plats, effect of regulations as to, upon vacation of streets and highways. 11 A.L.R.2d 587.

Toll road, title to, on abandonment by company. 30 A.L.R. 211.

What justifies discontinuance of highway. 68 A.L.R. 794.

24-6-2. Notice to abutting landowners of proposed abandonment.

Every town council, before proceeding to abandon any highway or driftway or any part thereof, shall give notice to the owners of the lands abutting upon any part of the highway or driftway within the town to appear, if they see fit, and be heard for or against the abandonment, and as to the damage, if any, which they will sustain thereby. Notice shall be given by advertisement once a week for three (3) successive weeks next prior to the meeting of the town council at which the abandonment is to be first considered, in some newspaper of general circulation within the city or town printed in English and a further and personal notice shall be served upon every person known to reside within this state who is an owner of land, abutting upon that part of the highway or driftway which it is proposed to abandon.

History of Section. P.L. 1903, ch. 1106, § 4; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 32; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 32; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 32; G.L. 1956, § 24-6-2 ; P.L. 1967, ch. 214, § 2; P.L. 1975, ch. 74, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Abandonment by Town Not Shown.

Where landowner never granted town an easement to use the driftway and the abandonment proceeding did not go forward; the town never posted notice on the driftway concerning its abandonment, nor did it publish notice in a newspaper; and, landowners-petitioners never collected damages as a result of the conditional abandonment, the town never abandoned the driftway. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Due Process.

The notice provisions contained in this and the preceding section are sufficient under due process. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

— Hearing.

The ruling that the taking of private property by eminent domain does not trigger the due process clause prior to the taking and that therefore no hearing is required prior to taking also applies to abandonment: plaintiffs are limited by the statutory scheme in their right to a pre-abandonment hearing. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

Cumberland (Rhode Island) town council’s decision to abandon an unnamed street that appeared on town maps was a legislative act, and the state supreme court lacked jurisdiction to review the merits of that decision in an action filed by property owners who opposed it. Gardner v. Cumberland Town Council, 826 A.2d 972, 2003 R.I. LEXIS 176 (R.I. 2003).

— Personal Notice.

This section clearly requires personal notice of an abandonment only if a highway abutter owns land abutting upon that part of the highway which it is proposed to abandon. D'Agostino v. Doorley, 118 R.I. 700 , 375 A.2d 948, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1510 (1977).

24-6-3. Damages payable to abutting landowners.

The owners of land abutting upon a highway or driftway in any town shall be entitled, upon the abandonment of the highway or driftway, either wholly or in part, to receive compensation from the town for the damages, if any, sustained by them by reason of the abandonment; and the town council, whenever it abandons the whole or any part of a public highway or driftway, shall at the same time appraise and award the damages.

History of Section. P.L. 1903, ch. 1106, § 3; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 31; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 31; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 31; G.L. 1956, § 24-6-3 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Abandonment by Town Not Shown.

Where landowner never granted town an easement to use the driftway, and the abandonment proceeding did not go forward; the town never posted notice on the driftway concerning its abandonment, nor did it publish notice in a newspaper; and, landowners-petitioners never collected damages as a result of the conditional abandonment, the town never abandoned the driftway. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Collateral References.

Nonabutting property, right of owner of, to compensation for vacation of section of street or highway. 49 A.L.R. 330, 93 A.L.R. 639.

24-6-4. Jury trial on damages.

Any person aggrieved by the order or decree of a town council awarding damages on the abandoning of a highway or driftway, or any part thereof, may within one year after the making of the award apply by petition to the superior court for the county in which the land lies, setting forth the action of the town council and praying for an assessment of his or her damages against the town by a jury. Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall cause twenty (20) days’ notice of the pendency thereof to be given to the town treasurer of the town by serving him or her with a certified copy thereof, and may proceed after the notice to the trial thereof, and the trial shall determine all questions of fact relating to the damages sustained by the petitioner, and the amount thereof, and judgment shall be entered upon the verdict of the jury, and thereupon the petitioner shall be entitled to all the remedies conferred in and by §§ 45-15-6 and 45-15-7 .

History of Section. P.L. 1903, ch. 1106, § 5; C.P.A. 1905, § 1222; G.L. 1909, ch. 82, § 33; G.L. 1923, ch. 95, § 33; G.L. 1938, ch. 72, § 33; G.L. 1956, § 24-6-4 .

24-6-5. Abandonment by non-use.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this chapter, when a public way of any kind in the town of Glocester has ceased to be used by the public and maintained by the town of Glocester for a period of twenty (20) years or more it shall be deemed abandoned and the abutting landowners shall not be entitled to recover damages against the city or town. Upon such abandonment the abutting landowners shall have a private right of access to their land along the abandoned way.

History of Section. P.L. 1990, ch. 511, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of P.L. 1990, ch. 511 provides that this section shall apply retroactively to July 1, 1970.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Keep Driftway Open.

The duty of a town owed to a driftway is to locate, mark, and repair the driftway so that it is passable and available for use by “People” and “Carriages”. O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Retroactive Application.

The retroactive application of this section violates due process and is thus unconstitutional. See O'Reilly v. Glocester, 621 A.2d 697, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 64 (R.I. 1993).

Chapter 7 Sidewalks

24-7-1. Power of towns to establish and regulate sidewalks.

  1. The town council of any town shall have the power to order sidewalks, including curbing of stone or other material, made and laid in and upon the streets and highways of the town, and may make ordinances and regulations relative to the altering or repairing thereof, to the use, maintenance, care, and cleaning of the sidewalks, to removing ice and snow therefrom, to the removal of posts, steps, and other obstructions therein, and to the maintenance and removal of awnings, signs, and other structures projecting over the sidewalks; provided, that the ordinances and regulations shall not be contrary to the laws of this state.
  2. The construction of sidewalks and curbs to be owned by all cities and towns and the maintenance of all sidewalks and curbs owned by all cities and towns, shall be in compliance with all state regulations promulgated by the director of transportation pursuant to subsection 42-13-1(b) .

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-1 ; P.L. 2010, ch. 206, § 1; P.L. 2010, ch. 213, § 1.

Cross References.

Establishment of sidewalks in connection with grading of highway, § 24-3-24 .

Improvements in connection with housing projects, § 45-25-24 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Curb Cuts.

This section authorized city to require by ordinance that curb cuts be authorized by commissioner of public works, and such ordinance was constitutional where reasonably carried out and the commissioner’s decisions were subject to review. Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 385 , 57 A.2d 173, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 10 (1948).

Decision denying curb cuts was arbitrary and unreasonable where it limited landowner to one cut for access to lot fronting on three streets and in effect prevented use of the lot for an otherwise lawful purpose. Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 385 , 57 A.2d 173, 1948 R.I. LEXIS 10 (1948).

Collateral References.

Driveways across sidewalk, power to regulate or prohibit. 73 A.L.R.2d 652.

Governmental liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or street intersection. 22 A.L.R.4th 624.

Governmental tort liability for injury allegedly caused by sidewalk or street defect. 58 A.L.R.4th 1197.

Grade of sidewalk, right of abutting owner to change. 62 A.L.R. 401.

Municipal liability for injuries from rough or uneven accumulations of snow or ice on sidewalks. 39 A.L.R.2d 782.

Municipality’s power to permit private owner to construct building or structure overhanging or crossing the air space above public street or sidewalk. 76 A.L.R.2d 896.

24-7-2. Order to lay sidewalk — Notice and hearing.

Whenever the town council shall determine by its vote that a sidewalk shall be made and laid in and upon any street or highway in the town, they may order the sidewalk to be made and laid upon like notice to the abutting landowner, as is provided in § 24-3-23 . At the same time and place named in the notice, the town council shall proceed to hear all the parties and to make and pass an order in reference to the making and laying of the sidewalk as they may think proper.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-2 .

24-7-3. Division of costs between town and landowners.

Whenever any sidewalk in and upon any street or highway shall be ordered made and laid as provided in § 24-7-2 , the owners of the land abutting on the sidewalk shall pay one-half (1/2) the costs thereof to be set against their respective lands, and the town shall pay the balance of the costs thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-3 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 58.

24-7-4. Collection of costs from landowners.

Costs of the sidewalk shall be ascertained by the commissioner of highways for the town and shall be submitted by the commissioner to, and be approved by, the town council, and thereafter the commissioner of highways shall demand the costs from the abutting landowner, and if the owner shall neglect and refuse to pay the costs, the commissioner of highways shall certify the costs so ascertained and approved to the assessors of taxes for the town, and the assessors shall include the cost of making and laying the sidewalk in the next assessment of taxes for the town against the land or the owner thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-4 .

24-7-5. Appeal of assessment.

Whenever any abutting landowner shall deem himself or herself aggrieved by the assessment of any tax for the making and laying of any sidewalk, as provided in § 24-7-4 , the landowner may appeal therefrom, according to provisions of law with reference to appeals from town councils.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-5 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 58.

24-7-6. Judgment and costs on appeal.

If the person appealing from any assessment of taxes for the making and laying of any sidewalk shall fail to have the taxes reduced on appeal, he or she shall be adjudged to pay the costs of suit, and the collector of taxes in the town may proceed to collect the taxes as if the appeal had not been taken, but if the appellant shall succeed in having the tax reduced, the appellant shall recover costs, and the collector of taxes shall collect from the appellant only so much of the tax as shall have been found on appeal to be due from the appellant.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-6 .

24-7-7. Penalties for violation of regulations.

The town council may prescribe and impose penalties for the violation of the ordinances and regulations herein provided for not exceeding an amount of twenty dollars ($20.00).

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 7; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-7 .

24-7-8. Sidewalks along state highways.

Nothing in this chapter shall be held to oust the state of jurisdiction over any such sidewalks and curbing as may be made, laid, or constructed upon state highways within a town, but no sidewalks or curbing on state highways shall be made, laid, or constructed without the approval of the director of transportation first being had and obtained as to the feasibility, location, type, and time of construction.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 8; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 8; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-8 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 58.

Cross References.

Sidewalks along state highways, § 24-8-6 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Maintain.

Town had duty under § 24-5-1 to keep sidewalks along state highways in good repair. But see Pullen v. State, 1998 (legislature clearly intended, by enacting §§ 24-8-6 and 24-8-9 , to provide state authority to enter into contracts regarding construction and maintenance of sidewalks and to fix the responsibilities of the state and municipalities in regard to the same). Child v. Greene, 51 R.I. 477 , 155 A. 664, 1931 R.I. LEXIS 87 (1931).

24-7-9. Permits for telephone booths and equipment — Exception.

In addition to all powers heretofore granted each city and town by charter or by the public laws of the state with respect to the maintenance and use of the sidewalks and the public highways and streets within the cities and towns, the city council of any city and the town council of any town is hereby empowered by ordinance to authorize the placing and maintenance of telephone booths, telephones, and their appurtenances within the limits of any sidewalk or public highway or street within the bounds of the city or town, and to designate a city or town official from time to time to issue permits therefor; and provided, further, that this section shall not apply to the placing and maintenance of the poles, wires, conduits, and other equipment of any telephone company within the limits of any sidewalk or public highway.

History of Section. P.L. 1961, ch. 125, § 1.

24-7-10. Westerly exempt.

The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the town of Westerly.

History of Section. P.L. 1928, ch. 1224, § 10; P.L. 1930, ch. 1611, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 348, § 9; P.L. 1950, ch. 2427, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-7-9 ; P.L. 1961, ch. 125, § 1.

24-7-11. William J. George Steps.

The Ocean Road steps at Matunuck Point in the town of South Kingstown shall be named and known as the “William J. George Steps”.

History of Section. P.L. 1991, ch. 389, § 1.

Chapter 8 Construction and Maintenance of State Roads

24-8-1. Annual report and recommendations — Roads on which expenditures made — Contracts.

The director of transportation shall annually make a report to the general assembly, during the month of January, setting forth in detail all its transactions during the preceding year and making such recommendations for improving the main highways of the state as the director shall deem necessary for the best interests of the entire state, having regard also to the connection of the main highways with the main highways of the adjoining states. No work, other than preliminary surveys, shall be done upon any of the main highways previous to the time that the main highways are made a part of the state highway system and money appropriated for their improvement. The director shall direct and control, according to law, the expenditure of all appropriations and upon the director’s request the department of administration is hereby authorized to make all contracts necessary for that purpose.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 3; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 3; P.L. 1920, ch. 1877, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 3; P.L. 1931, ch. 1772, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 3; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2727, art. 1, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-1 ; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 69.

Cross References.

Functions of department of transportation, §§ 37-5-1 , 42-13-2 .

State highway and road defined, § 43-3-17 .

Comparative Legislation.

State highways:

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-36 et seq.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 81, § 1 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Liability for Neglect.

Sections 24-5-12 and 24-5-13 specifically impose liability on towns for personal injuries resulting from neglect to keep town highways in repair. There are no comparable statutes applicable to the state’s duty as to state highways under this section. Knudsen v. Hall, 490 A.2d 976, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 481 (R.I. 1985).

The state is not subject to suit by individuals injured as a result of the state’s failure to keep its highways in good repair as required by this section, because the state duty in this situation is one owed to the general public and not a special duty owed to the individual drivers on state highways. Knudsen v. Hall, 490 A.2d 976, 1985 R.I. LEXIS 481 (R.I. 1985).

Collateral References.

Governmental tort liability for injury allegedly caused by sidewalk or street defect. 58 A.L.R.4th 1197.

24-8-1.1. Rhode Island highway system — Purpose.

The purpose of §§ 24-8-1.1 24-8-1.7 is to establish a pavement management program to better maintain the state’s highways in a safe and serviceable condition. In order to fairly distribute funds for a pavement management program, an equitable system to determine jurisdiction on highways is needed. The principles of highway functional classification, or the importance of roads in terms of the type of travel service provided, shall be used to determine jurisdiction. Roads serving longer-distance travel, connecting city and town centers and major traffic generators shall be the state’s responsibility. Roads serving local travel shall be under city or town jurisdiction.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-1.2. Rhode Island highway system — Establishment.

There is hereby established a Rhode Island highway system which shall include state roads and municipal roads. The determination of those roads designated as state roads and those designated as municipal roads shall be based upon a functional classification system, as established by the state planning council.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-1.3. Definitions.

  1. “Arterial” means a public road that provides a high level of travel services for a long, uninterrupted distance.
  2. “Major collector” means a public road that provides a service to built up areas of towns and traffic generators of regional importance and not directly served by arterials.
  3. “Municipal roads” means any public road not designated as a state road either under the statute or under the functional classification guidelines.
  4. “Pavement management program” includes resurfacing, striping and signing; minor drainage improvements, minor guardrail improvements, crack sealing, chip sealing, retaining wall repair, sidewalk and curb repair. The program shall also include educational activities, training programs, research grants, and such technical assistance as can be provided by maximizing the use of state education resources.
  5. “Rhode Island highway system” means all public roads including both state roads and municipal roads.
  6. “Rural” means an area not included in the boundary of an urban area.
  7. “State roads” means all public roads classified as arterials and major collectors, except urban minor arterials located in the eight (8) cities of Central Falls, Cranston, East Providence, Newport, Pawtucket, Providence, Warwick, and Woonsocket.
  8. “Urban” means an area so designated for purposes of highway functional classification, based on criteria as established by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-1.4. Annual report and recommendations — Roads on which expenditures made — Contracts.

  1. The director of transportation shall annually make a report to the general assembly, during the month of January, setting forth in detail all the department’s transactions during the preceding year, and making such recommendations for improving the Rhode Island highway system, as the director shall deem necessary, in the best interest of the state, having regard also for the connection of the system with the main highways of the adjoining states.
  2. The director of transportation shall direct and control, according to law, the expenditure of all appropriations for improvement and upon the director’s request, the department of administration is hereby authorized to make all contracts necessary for that purpose. Any work in reference to state roads must be approved by the director of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-1.5. Turnback implementation plan.

The director of transportation shall prepare and carry out a plan regarding an implementation schedule for all roads changing jurisdiction as a result of this section. Any road that changes jurisdiction and becomes a municipal road, under the enactment of this section, that such shall be repaired and improved, as may be deemed necessary, by the department of transportation to a safe and usable condition before the road is returned to the jurisdiction of the municipality; provided, however that no road shall be returned to the jurisdiction of a municipality without its consent if the jurisdiction does not have a full-time highway department; and provided further that in the town of Portsmouth to preserve the coastal right-of-way for highway purposes, Park Avenue, Point Road, and Hummock Avenue including the “Cove Bridge” shall not be returned to the jurisdiction of the town of Portsmouth and shall remain the responsibility of the state.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4; P.L. 1989, ch. 459, § 1.

24-8-1.6. Review.

The initial review of the functional classification system for jurisdictional purposes shall be completed by May 15, 1988. A review of this functional classification system shall take place every ten (10) years. The review shall come under the supervision and authority of the state planning council. Any amendment made to the functional classification system within the ten (10) year period, shall not change the jurisdictional responsibilities for maintenance of those roads affected by the modification.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-1.7. Rules and regulations.

The director of transportation is hereby authorized to adopt and enforce such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and § 43-3-17 , to establish and adopt a pavement management program, and to enforce the provisions thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 4.

24-8-2, 24-8-3. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 4; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 4; P.L. 1912, ch. 799, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 4; P.L. 1927, ch. 987, § 1; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 4; G.L. 1956, §§ 24-8-2 , 24-8-3; Repealed by P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 5, effective July 1, 1988.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former §§ 24-8-2 and 24-8-3 concerned two lane and four lane highways.

24-8-4. Improvement, reconstruction, or widening of roads — Widening at town expense.

The director of transportation shall have the power and authority to improve, rebuild, and reconstruct any existing state highway in accordance with this section, if the improvement, rebuilding, and reconstruction will facilitate the free and easy movement of vehicle traffic and help to increase the safety of the state highways. The director of transportation in carrying out all the construction and improvement shall avoid as far as possible the creation of sharp angles, turns or grades. Any city or town desiring to have a highway constructed or improved to a greater width than the width determined upon by the director of transportation may agree in writing with the director of transportation for such additional width as the city or town may desire; provided, the entire expense of the additional width shall be paid by the city or town to the general treasurer, and be credited to the amount available for use by the director of transportation for the purpose of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 4; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 4; P.L. 1912, ch. 799, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 4; P.L. 1927, ch. 987, § 1; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, §§ 4, 28; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-4 ; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 69.

Cross References.

Condemnation of property for road purposes, § 37-6-13 et seq.

Construction plans to be prepared by professional engineer, § 5-8-17 .

Receipts from towns credited to appropriations, § 35-3-14 .

Taking of private property, R.I. Const., Art. 1, § 16 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Centralized Control.

This section tends to indicate that control of state highways was intended to be centralized, rather than in the towns. Pooler v. Burton, 40 R.I. 249 , 100 A. 465, 1917 R.I. LEXIS 29 (1917).

Collateral References.

Constitutionality and construction of statute relating to location or relocation of highways. 63 A.L.R. 516.

Construction and maintenance of streets and roads constituting a part of the state highway. 144 A.L.R. 312.

Power and duty of highway officers as regards location or route of road to be constructed or improved. 91 A.L.R. 242.

Prohibition to control action of administrative officers in establishment of highway. 115 A.L.R. 23, 159 A.L.R. 627.

24-8-4.1. Highway workers.

All persons working on any public way in this state shall be required to wear distinctly visible clothing of a type approved by the director of the department of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1971, ch. 68, § 1.

24-8-4.2. Use of truck mounted attenuator.

  1. At any and all times during which construction and/or maintenance work is being undertaken on any state highway and/or interstate connector, under the terms of either the highway or bridge contract in which an attenuator truck is required under federal and/or Rhode Island department of transportation guidelines, no attenuator truck shall be left unattended while work is actively being performed. Further, at all times while that work is actively being performed, an attenuator truck shall be deployed on the worksite. A minimum of one attenuator truck shall be equipped with a first-aid kit and two (2) fire extinguishers. The operator of the attenuator truck shall have completed appropriate training and be certified in both first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A copy of both first aid and CPR certifications shall be kept with the truck driver.
  2. The penalty for failure to comply with this section shall be as set forth in § 31-27-22 .

History of Section. P.L. 2000, ch. 355, § 1; P.L. 2000, ch. 457, § 1; P.L. 2007, ch. 343, § 1; P.L. 2007, ch. 472, § 1.

24-8-5. Repealed.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 26, as enacted by P.L. 1931, ch. 1772, § 2; P.L. 1938, ch. 2576, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 23; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 60, § 100; G.L. 1956, §§ 24-8-5 ; Repealed by P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 5, effective July 1, 1988.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-8-5 concerned the construction and maintenance of city streets as state roads.

24-8-6. Authority for sidewalks and curbs.

The director of transportation shall have the power and authority to make, lay in and upon, and construct sidewalks, including curbs, adjacent to and along either or any one side or both sides of any state road, now constructed, in the process of construction, or to be constructed, which in his or her opinion and judgment require sidewalks and curbs for pedestrian travel.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 27; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 24; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-6 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6.

Cross References.

Jurisdiction over sidewalks, § 24-7-8 .

Law Reviews.

Caselaw Survey Section: Municipal Law, see 4 R.W.U.L. Rev. 763 (1999).

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Maintain.

The state’s execution of a construction and maintenance agreement with a city in which the state unequivocally agreed to maintain a sidewalk divested the city of any duty of maintenance and so the city owed no duty to keep the sidewalk safe for pedestrian travel. Pullen v. State, 707 A.2d 686, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 25 (R.I. 1998).

24-8-7. Specifications for curbs and sidewalks.

Whenever and wherever the director of transportation shall order and cause the building and construction of curbs and sidewalks as provided in this chapter, the curb shall be made and constructed of a suitable and hard material. The curb shall be set and shall not project above the edge of the highway more than twelve inches (12") nor less than four inches (4"). The width of the curb at the top shall not be more than twelve inches (12") and not less than four inches (4"). The sidewalk shall be made and constructed of a suitable and hard material with a smooth hard finished surface or face. Whenever and wherever feasible and practical, the surface or face of the sidewalk shall be set and laid flush with the top of the curb and shall not be less than four feet (4´) wide from the inside top edge of the curb.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 28; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 25; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-7 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 59.

24-8-8. Space between curb and traveled highway.

The director of transportation whenever and wherever laying out the plans and drawing up the specifications for the building and construction of curbs and sidewalks, as provided in this chapter, shall, whenever and wherever feasible and practical, cause and order the curb to be placed and set back from the outside paved or metal edge of the state road not less than eight feet (8´). The intervening part of the road between the outside paved or metal edge of the road and the curb shall be brought up to the proper grade and line of the road and shall have a continuous smooth surface so that the road shall have a continuous smooth surface from the center line of the road to the face of the curb. Whenever and wherever the director of transportation decides that in his or her opinion and judgment on certain roads and portions of certain roads it is not feasible and practical to build and construct the curb placed and set back not less than eight feet (8´) from the outside paved or metal edge of the roads as provided in this chapter, the director of transportation shall cause and order the curb placed and set against the outside paved or metal edge of the roads; provided, the adjacent outside lane of vehicle travel of the paved or metal portion of the road is not less than twelve feet (12´) in width where feasible and practicable.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 29; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 26; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-8 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 59.

24-8-9. Regulations of sidewalks and curbs.

The director of transportation shall have the power and authority to alter, to maintain, to keep in good condition, to remove ice and snow therefrom, to remove posts, steps and any other obstructions therein, to regulate the placement, structure, and alteration of curbs constructed adjacent to state roads, to regulate the height, size, and shape of awnings, signs, and any other structures which project over all curbs and all sidewalks now constructed, in the process of construction or to be constructed on state roads; except, on portion or portions of state roads in cities or towns where the territory contiguous thereto is closely built up.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 30; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 27; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-9 ; P.L. 1983, ch. 80, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6.

Law Reviews.

Caselaw Survey Section: Municipal Law, see 4 R.W.U.L. Rev. 763 (1999).

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Maintain.

The state’s execution of a construction and maintenance agreement with a city in which the state unequivocally agreed to maintain a sidewalk divested the city of any duty of maintenance and so the city owed no duty to keep the sidewalk safe for pedestrian travel. Pullen v. State, 707 A.2d 686, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 25 (R.I. 1998).

Absent a construction and maintenance contract with a town, the state did not have a duty to maintain and repair a sidewalk adjacent to a state highway within the town. Town of Lincoln v. State, 712 A.2d 357, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 157 (R.I. 1998).

Collateral References.

Governmental liability for failure to reduce vegetation obscuring view at railroad crossing or street intersection. 22 A.L.R.4th 624.

Governmental tort liability for injury allegedly caused by sidewalk or street defect. 58 A.L.R.4th 1197.

24-8-10. Improvement or reconstruction of railroad crossings.

The director of transportation shall have the power and authority to improve with automatic protection devices or by relocating or rebuilding existing highway-railroad crossings at grade, or by reconstructing existing railroad and highway separation structures, if the improvements, rebuilding, or reconstruction will increase the safety of the crossings and highway, or may eliminate the crossings at grade by the adjustment of track and highway levels and by the construction of separation structures and connecting roadways suitably located to serve all affected properties, and by closing the highways at existing crossings so served, subject to approval of the railroad authorities and the public utilities and carriers administration as provided in chapters 1 — 9 of title 39. For railroad-highway crossings not on the state highway system, the improvements, construction, reconstruction, or closing shall also be subject to the approval of the town or city in which the work is to be performed.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 29; P.L. 1949, ch. 2340, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-10 .

24-8-11. Beautification.

The department of transportation is hereby authorized and empowered to plant trees, shrubs and otherwise beautify the area within the limits of a road in a manner and at locations as the department may deem advisable, and the cost of the work shall be paid from moneys, appropriated for highway purposes, not otherwise needed for the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of state roads and bridges; and the state controller is hereby authorized and directed to draw his or her orders upon the general treasurer for the payment of such sums as may from time to time be required, upon receipt by him or her of proper vouchers approved by the director of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1930, ch. 1557, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 78, § 1; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, §§ 65, 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-11 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6.

24-8-12. Contracts — Advertising for bids.

All road construction or improvements made by the director of transportation shall be, and all repairs may be, performed by written contract, made by the department of administration in behalf of the state, and after advertisement, by order of the department of administration has been published at least once in a newspaper of statewide circulation and at least five (5) calendar days before the final date of submitting bids, inviting sealed proposals for the road construction or improvement, to be made under the supervision and subject to the approval of the department of administration, and in accordance with the plans and specifications of the department of transportation; and the advertisement shall state the time and place the plans and specifications may be examined, and when the proposals made in answer to the advertisement will be opened, and shall reserve the right of the department of administration to reject any and all proposals.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 5; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 5; P.L. 1913, ch. 925, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 5; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 5; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2727, art. 1, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-12 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6.

Cross References.

Labor and debt payment provisions, § 37-13-1 et seq.

Collateral References.

Alteration of plans or materials as necessary or proper factor in proposal for or acceptance of bids. 96 A.L.R. 712.

Authority of state or its subdivision to reject all bids for public contracts. 52 A.L.R.4th 186.

Construction of contract by architect or engineer as made binding on contractor by terms of contract. 137 A.L.R. 540.

Mandamus to compel consideration, acceptance, or rejection of bids. 80 A.L.R. 1382.

Variation by bidder from specifications on bid for public work. 65 A.L.R. 835.

Waiver of competitive bidding requirements for state and local public building and construction contracts. 40 A.L.R.4th 968.

24-8-13. Contractors’ bond — Forfeiture.

The person whose proposal or bid is accepted by the department of administration, shall be required to give bond, in a sum not less than fifty percent (50%) of the contract price, to indemnify the town or city where the road lies against damage while the road is being constructed or improved, and the state shall not be liable for any damage occasioned thereby; and every contract made for the construction or improvement shall provide for a forfeiture of such sum or sums as the department may deem proper, for failure to complete, according to contract, the road construction or improvement within the specified time.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 6; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 6; P.L. 1920, ch. 1877, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 6; impl. am. P.L. 1951, ch. 2727, art. 1, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-13 .

Cross References.

Contractors’ bonds, § 37-12-1 et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Liability of State for Damages.

This section does not immunize the state from liability in suits brought by private individuals for damages resulting from road construction. Longtin v. D'Ambra Constr. Co., 588 A.2d 1044, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 48 (R.I. 1991).

The language of this section clearly states that the bond is intended to indemnify cities and towns for any damage caused by reconstruction within the city or town. The state will not be liable to cities or towns for any such damage; rather, the recourse for a city or town will be against the contractor’s bond. Longtin v. D'Ambra Constr. Co., 588 A.2d 1044, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 48 (R.I. 1991).

Collateral References.

Construction contractor’s liability for injuries to third persons by materials or debris on highway during course of construction or repair. 3 A.L.R.4th 770.

Contractor for public improvement not legally authorized, recovery of premiums paid on bond. 42 A.L.R. 307.

Insurance premiums other than workmen’s compensation, contractor’s bond as covering. 129 A.L.R. 1087.

Loans or advances to building or construction contractor as within coverage of his bond. 127 A.L.R. 974, 164 A.L.R. 782.

Loss of profits of subcontractor, laborer, or materialman as within coverage of contractor’s bond. 119 A.L.R. 1281.

Medical or hospital services to employees, claim for, as within coverage of bond. 81 A.L.R. 1051.

Statutory condition prescribed for public contractor’s bond as part of bond which does not in terms include it. 89 A.L.R. 446.

Statutory conditions, effect of affirmative provision in public contractor’s bond excluding. 77 A.L.R. 166, 118 A.L.R. 57.

Strike, what amounts to within clause of contractors’ bonds. 11 A.L.R. 1004, 35 A.L.R. 721.

24-8-14. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 6; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 6; P.L. 1920, ch. 1877, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-14 ; Repealed by P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 5, effective July 1, 1988.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-8-14 concerned responsibility for maintenance.

24-8-15. Snow and ice removal — Notice of defects.

  1. Every town or city shall at its own expense keep state roads within its limits, respectively, sufficiently clear of snow and ice so the roads shall be reasonably safe for travel as now required by law, and shall at once notify in writing the director of transportation or his or her employees of any defect or want of repair of state roads within its limits.
    1. All storage piles or areas where road de-icing agents are stored within the Scituate watershed shall be adequately covered and stored on an impervious base to mitigate runoff impacts to ground and surface waters. The director of the department of transportation shall ensure where funds allow, that all drivers, loaders and handlers of de-icing agents within any watershed participate in training sessions in the proper application and control of road de-icing agents; that de-icing vehicles, wherever feasible, operating within the Scituate watershed area equipped with sensor devices to control the spread rate of de-icing materials in relation to the speed of the vehicle.
    2. For purposes of this section the “Scituate watershed” shall mean the total drainage area into the Scituate Reservoir — an area of some 92.8 square miles in the towns of Scituate, Johnston, Foster, Glocester, and Smithfield — which because of its topography, soil type, and drainage patterns acts as a collector of rain waters which replenish or regorge existing public drinking water supplies in the Scituate Reservoir.

History of Section. P.L. 1902, ch. 982, § 6; G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 6; P.L. 1920, ch. 1877, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 6; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-15 ; P.L. 1990, ch. 472, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 59; P.L. 2005, ch. 195, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 200, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 415, § 32.

Cross References.

Removal of snow and ice from bridges, § 24-8-26 .

Removal of snow and ice from sidewalks, § 24-8-9 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Maintain.

Town did not owe a private duty to a motorist arising out of a failure to remove snow and ice from a state highway pursuant to the provisions of this section. Tucci v. Gill, 598 A.2d 1376, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 164 (R.I. 1991).

Municipal Liability.

There is no provision in the General Laws that imposes any liability or creates a cause of action against a city or town for failure to comply with this section. Tucci v. Gill, 598 A.2d 1376, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 164 (R.I. 1991).

Collateral References.

Liability for injury or damage caused by snowplowing or snow removal operations and equipment. 83 A.L.R.4th 5.

Liability in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from snow or ice on surface of highway or street. 97 A.L.R.3d 11.

24-8-16. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1920, ch. 1904, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 9; P.L. 1928, ch. 1169, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 9; P.L. 1947, ch. 1960, § 1; P.L. 1953, ch. 3320, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-16 ; P.L. 1958, ch. 102, § 1; P.L. 1959, ch. 28, § 1; P.L. 1960, ch. 190, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6; Repealed by P.L. 1991, ch. 44, art. 12, § 1, effective July 1, 1991.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-8-16 concerned appropriations for funding of the highway system.

24-8-17. Determination and payment of appropriations to the state, cities, and towns.

The amounts which the state, cities, and towns shall receive from the appropriations provided for in this chapter, shall annually be determined by the state controller upon filing by the director of transportation of a report setting forth the number of miles of roads within the state and within each city and town which are functionally classified as: principal arterials, minor arterials, major collectors, minor collectors, and urban collectors, and within each city and town of the total number of motor vehicle registrations. The state controller is hereby authorized and directed, upon receipt by him or her of the report as provided in this section, to draw his or her orders upon the general treasurer in favor of the respective state budget officer for the payment of such sums, as may from time to time be required, or become due to the respective state, city, or town under the provisions of this chapter. Nothing in this section shall affect the federal aid transportation program.

History of Section. P.L. 1920, ch. 1904, § 4; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 12; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 11; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 65; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-17 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 59.

24-8-18. Use of sums appropriated — Annual report.

The sums paid to the state, cities, or towns under the provisions of this chapter shall be used exclusively within the state, and within the cities and towns for those roads listed under § 24-8-17 . The sums shall only be spent for maintenance and repair. Except up to twenty-five percent (25%) of each city or town’s allotment is eligible for expenditure on any highway pavement management need. Each and every year after the initial year of this program, in order to obtain payment under this title, the state and each city or town must first receive approval for the expenditures by the director of transportation. The city or town treasurer, or state budget officer shall on or before May 30th of each year, certify in writing to the director of transportation how the sums have been expended.

History of Section. P.L. 1920, ch. 1904, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 10; P.L. 1923, ch. 474, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 10; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-18 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 69.

24-8-19. Designation and maintenance of detours.

  1. Whenever it is necessary for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, or repairing state roads to close such roads to the traveling public, the department of transportation shall provide suitable detours, and when roads other than state roads are designated by the department of transportation as detours, then the other roads shall be maintained in reasonably good condition by the department of transportation during their use as detours, and for the purpose of providing and maintaining the detours, may expend in the aggregate from appropriations available for the construction, reconstruction or repair, a sum not exceeding thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) annually and the state controller is hereby directed to draw his or her orders upon the general treasurer for the payment of so much thereof as may be from time to time required upon receipt of properly authenticated vouchers.
  2. The designation and use as a detour of any road other than a state road, and the maintenance of another road so used shall in no way be construed as acceptance as a state road, and the other road shall not come under the supervision of the department of transportation except for use as a detour as provided in this section.

History of Section. G.L. 1909, ch. 84, § 10; P.L. 1919, ch. 1777, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 8; P.L. 1928, ch. 1147, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 8; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, §§ 65, 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-19 .

Collateral References.

Governmental tort liability for detour accidents. 1 A.L.R.5th 163.

24-8-20. Location of fuel pumps adjacent to highway.

No owner or other persons shall hereafter locate a pump as defined in § 31-36-1 , or a pump to be used to distribute lubricating oils or any attachments thereof within ten feet (10´) of the boundary line of a state road without first obtaining the permission of the department of transportation. The department shall determine applications for permission upon the basis of public safety and may impose upon permits granted reasonable conditions to insure public safety.

History of Section. P.L. 1925, ch. 679, § 15; P.L. 1929, ch. 1405, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 30; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; redesignated § 31 by P.L. 1949, ch. 2340, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-20 ; P.L. 1988, ch. 633, § 6.

24-8-21. Jurisdiction of bridges on state highways.

All bridges lying in any highway or highways which have been constructed by or upon which work has been done by the state under the supervision of the state board of public roads shall hereafter come under the supervision of the director of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 13; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 12; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-21 .

Cross References.

Destruction of bridges, § 11-4-3 .

Minimum clearance on bridges erected over railroad tracks, § 39-7-1 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Duty to Maintain.

Prior to passage of this section, state board had no authority over bridges and town had duty to maintain bridge on state road. McCommiskey v. Greene, 32 R.I. 402 , 79 A. 819, 1911 R.I. LEXIS 30 (1911).

After passage of this section city no longer had a duty to maintain bridge on state highway, even though the bridge had been constructed before this section was enacted. Johnson v. Lee, 38 R.I. 316 , 95 A. 601, 1915 R.I. LEXIS 68 (1915).

Scope of Section.

Portions of highway on both ends of bridge formed one continuous highway, so that work done on portion leading to one end of the bridge would bring the bridge under this section even though the state had never done any work on the portion of highway leading to the other end. Johnson v. Lee, 39 R.I. 528 , 99 A. 308, 1916 R.I. LEXIS 67 (1916).

Collateral References.

Liability for damage to highway or bridge caused by size or weight of motor vehicle or load. 53 A.L.R.3d 1035.

Measure and elements of damages for injury to bridge. 31 A.L.R.5th 171.

24-8-22. Examination and repair or construction of bridges.

The director of transportation shall make an examination of all state bridges, and shall determine which of the bridges shall be constructed, repaired or reconstructed, and contracts shall be placed in the manner prescribed by § 24-8-12 for the construction, reparation or reconstruction of the bridges; and the expense of the construction, reparation or reconstruction shall be paid by the state from funds available for this purpose.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 2; P.L. 1919, ch. 1765, § 1; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 14; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 13; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 261; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-22 .

Collateral References.

Governmental liability for injury or death resulting from design, construction, or failure to warn of narrow bridge. 2 A.L.R.4th 635.

24-8-23. Cost of construction or repair of bridges used by public utilities.

  1. Upon the completion of the construction, reparation or reconstruction of any of the bridges, used by any public utility, the director of transportation shall file a full and detailed statement setting forth the amount expended in the construction, reparation or reconstruction of each bridge used by any public utility, with the public utility administrator, and a copy of the statement shall be filed in the treasurer’s office of the public utility. The public utility administrator, shall immediately set a time for hearing and shall, after notice of the hearing to the public utility and to the department of transportation, determine what amount, if any, of the expense of the construction, reparation or reconstruction of the bridge or bridges shall be paid by the public utility upon the basis and in the manner provided in § 39-2-6 .
  2. If any payment, determined to be due from any public utility shall not be paid to the state within one year from the date of the determination by the public utility administrator of the amount due from any public utility, the state shall be entitled to recover the amount due in an action of debt, together with interest from six (6) months from the date of the determination by the public utility administrator, at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, and upon securing judgment against any public utility, execution shall issue against the property of the public utility.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 3; P.L. 1919, ch. 1765, § 2; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 15; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 14; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 123; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-23 .

Cross References.

Receipts from utilities credited to appropriation, § 35-3-14 .

Repair and reconstruction of bridge used by street railway, § 39-2-6 .

24-8-24. Bridges incorporated into state system — Responsibility for maintenance.

All bridges so repaired, constructed, or reconstructed pursuant to the provisions set forth in this chapter shall, upon the completion of the construction, reparation or reconstruction, be and become a part of the state highway system, and shall henceforth be repaired, maintained, and reconstructed by the state under the supervision of the director of transportation, except that where any of the bridges are used by any public utility, then the public utility shall pay in the manner provided by § 24-8-23 toward the maintenance, reparation, and reconstruction of the bridge.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 6; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 18; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 15; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-24 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 59.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

After passage of this section city no longer had a duty to maintain bridge on state highway, even though the bridge had been constructed before this section was enacted. Johnson v. Lee, 38 R.I. 316 , 95 A. 601, 1915 R.I. LEXIS 68 (1915).

Collateral References.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from failure to repair pothole in surface of highway or street. 98 A.L.R.3d 101.

Personal injury liability of civil engineer for negligence in highway or bridge construction. 43 A.L.R.4th 911.

24-8-25. Bringing new bridges into state system.

Any bridge lying in any highway or highways which have been constructed by or upon which work has been done by the state under the supervision of the director of transportation, which shall not be constructed, repaired, or reconstructed by the director of transportation before the making of the director’s next annual report, may be included in the director’s next or any subsequent annual report and recommended for construction, reparation, or reconstruction, and the general assembly may appropriate money for the construction, reparation, or reconstruction. And whenever hereafter the director of transportation shall recommend the relocating, regrading, or improving of any highway which shall include any bridge, the bridge shall come under the supervision of the director of transportation, and the legislature shall, upon appropriating money for the relocating, regrading, or improving of the highway, also make a specific appropriation for the construction, reparation, or reconstruction of the bridge according to the recommendations of the director of transportation, except that each public utility using any of the bridges shall repay to the state the portion of the cost of construction, reparation, or reconstruction of the bridges to be determined in such manner as is provided by § 24-8-23 . The bridges when so constructed, repaired, or reconstructed shall thereupon become a part of the state highway system, and shall henceforth be maintained by the state, except those bridges which are used by any public utility which shall pay a part of the cost of maintenance of the bridges in the manner provided by § 24-8-23 .

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 7; P.L. 1919, ch. 1765, § 5; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 19; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 16; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-25 .

24-8-26. Removal of snow and ice from bridges — Notice of defects.

  1. Every town or city in which any bridge is located, which shall be maintained by the state under the provisions of this chapter, shall at its own expense keep the bridge within its limits sufficiently clear of snow and ice so that the bridge shall be reasonably safe for traveling, and shall at once notify in writing the director of transportation or the director’s employees of any defect or want of repair in the bridge. The director of transportation shall upon the receipt of the information notify any public utility using the bridge of the defect or want of repair.
  2. All storage piles or areas where road de-icing agents are stored within the Scituate watershed shall be adequately covered and stored on an impervious base to mitigate runoff impacts to ground and surface waters. The director of the department of transportation shall ensure where funds allow, that all drivers, loaders, and handlers of de-icing agents within any watershed participate in training sessions in the proper application and control of road de-icing agents; that de-icing vehicles, wherever feasible, operating within the Scituate watershed area equipped with sensor devices to control the spread rate of de-icing materials in relation to the speed of the vehicle.
  3. For purposes of this section the “Scituate watershed” shall mean the total drainage area into the Scituate Reservoir — an area of some 92.8 square miles in the towns of Scituate, Johnston, Foster, Glocester, and Smithfield — which because of its topography, soil type, and drainage patterns acts as a collector of rain waters which replenish or regorge existing public drinking water supplies in the Scituate Reservoir.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 8; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 20; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 17; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-26 ; P.L. 1990, ch. 472, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 195, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 200, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 415, § 32.

Collateral References.

Liability for injury or damage caused by snowplowing or snow removal operations and equipment. 83 A.L.R.4th 5.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from snow or ice on surface of highway or street. 97 A.L.R. 3d 11.

Liability in negligence action, of state highway, or turnpike authority. 62 A.L.R.2d 1222.

24-8-27. “Bridge” defined — Responsibility for smaller structures.

The word “bridge” as used in this chapter shall be any structure not less than five feet (5´) in width. Any structure less than five feet (5´) in width lying in any highway now being or hereafter becoming a part of the state highway system shall be constructed, repaired or reconstructed at the expense of the state.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 9; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 21; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 18; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-27 .

24-8-28. Repealed.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 24; P.L. 1926, ch. 786, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 21; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-28 ; Repealed by P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 2, effective June 15, 2012.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-8-28 concerned the Sakonnet River stone bridge.

24-8-29. Succession of director to stone bridge commissioner.

Whenever the words “commissioner of the Rhode Island stone bridge” occur in any general law, public law, or resolution of the general assembly or are used in any document, record, instrument, or proceeding authorized by any such law or resolution relating to the commissioner of the Rhode Island stone bridge, the words shall be construed to mean the director of the department of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1926, ch. 786, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 22; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-29 .

24-8-30. Red Bridge exempt.

Red Bridge, lying between Providence and East Providence, is excluded from the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1912, ch. 846, § 10; G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 22; P.L. 1926, ch. 786, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 19; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-30 .

24-8-31. Federal aid rights preserved.

The provisions of this chapter shall not be used or construed in any manner or in any way so as to prevent the state from receiving any kind or type of government or federal aid for the roads and bridges of the state from the United States government.

History of Section. G.L. 1923, ch. 97, § 32; P.L. 1935, ch. 2269, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 74, § 29; redesignated § 30 by P.L. 1949, ch. 2340, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-8-31 .

24-8-32. Drainage of surface water.

Whenever any culvert, drain, or watercourse has been placed and maintained or has existed under or within a state highway for the purpose of disposing of surface water drainage, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to obstruct, block, or close any intake or outlet from the culvert, drain, or watercourse without first obtaining permission from the state department of transportation, which may grant the permits under the terms and conditions as are warranted.

History of Section. P.L. 1958, ch. 204, § 1.

24-8-33. Connection into drainage system.

It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to make any connection into a state road drainage system, or to drain or pump water onto the travelled surface of a state highway without first obtaining written permission from the director of the state department of transportation. The director of the department of transportation is empowered to make and file rules and regulations which prescribe the conditions under which the permission shall be granted. The director shall render a decision within ninety (90) days of receipt of the request for permission. Any person, firm, or corporation convicted of violating this section shall be fined one hundred dollars ($100).

History of Section. P.L. 1958, ch. 204, § 1; P.L. 1983, ch. 80, § 1; P.L. 1992, ch. 401, § 2; P.L. 1994, ch. 200, § 1.

24-8-34. Regulation of access.

  1. The legislature recognizes the need for the director of the department of transportation to establish and maintain the safe condition and integrity of state roads. Accordingly, the director is authorized to regulate direct vehicle access to state roads in situations whereby access may reasonably tend to affect the safe condition and integrity of state roads. This includes the authority to regulate the type, location, and width of roadways and driveways at their intersection with state highways and the authority to regulate construction within state highway right-of-ways.
  2. Requests for access must be made in writing to the director, the local planning board and the chief elected or appointed official in a city or town at the same time and in a manner prescribed by the director. The director shall promulgate rules and regulations which prescribe the conditions under which requests will be granted. These rules and regulations shall apply prospectively and shall be based on accepted engineering and construction standards.
  3. The director may provide written notice and comments on the proposed access or alterations to the planning board and the chief elected or appointed official of the city or town in which the state highway is located for all commercial and residential physical alteration permit applications filed with the department and shall afford the planning board and the chief elected or appointed official of the city or town with the ability to provide written comments on the request.

History of Section. P.L. 1958, ch. 204, § 1; P.L. 1983, ch. 80, § 1; P.L. 1994, ch. 300, § 1; P.L. 1999, ch. 478, § 1.

24-8-35. Damage caused by potholes — Claims against the state.

If any person shall incur damage to his or her motor vehicle by reason of a pothole on any state highway, causeway, or bridge which damage would not have occurred without the existence of the pothole, he or she may recover from the state the amount of damages sustained up to and not more than the sum of three hundred dollars ($300). All claims shall be made within a period of seven (7) days from the date on which the damage was sustained by filing a written report in a manner prescribed by the director of the department of transportation who shall in all instances make the final determination as to the merits of any claim so submitted. All claims approved by the director shall be paid in full within forty-five (45) days of the final approval. In no instance, however, shall any claim for damage so caused to a motor vehicle registered in a foreign state be considered unless that state has a similar statute affording similar protection to persons owning motor vehicles registered in this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1979, ch. 16, § 1; P.L. 1994, ch. 70, art. 7, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Public Duty Doctrine.

In a case in which plaintiff was injured when his vehicle struck a pothole, the Supreme Court held that the State’s failure to repair the pothole was shielded from tort liability under the public duty doctrine. It disagreed with plaintiff’s contention that this section creates a limited exception to the public duty doctrine that was applicable. Georges v. State, 249 A.3d 1261, 2021 R.I. LEXIS 35 (R.I. 2021).

Collateral References.

Liability, in motor vehicle-related cases, of governmental entity for injury or death resulting from failure to repair pothole in surface of highway or street. 98 A.L.R.3d 101.

24-8-36. Right to administrative appeal.

Any person, firm, or corporation aggrieved by a decision of the director pursuant to this chapter has the right to an appeal in accordance with the procedures contained within chapter 35 of title 42.

History of Section. P.L. 1983, ch. 80, § 2.

24-8-37. Penalties.

Any person, firm, corporation, or municipality who violates any of the provisions of §§ 24-8-32 24-8-34 may be enjoined upon a complaint filed by the director in superior court.

History of Section. P.L. 1983, ch. 80, § 2.

24-8-38. Bristol road striping.

The state shall on or before the twenty-seventh day of June of each year cause the center yellow lines in the town of Bristol to be painted red, white, and blue beginning on Hope Street at the intersection of Chestnut Street continuing south on Hope Street to the intersection of High Street and then continuing north on High Street to the intersection of State Street at which point the line shall end.

History of Section. P.L. 1984, ch. 165, § 1.

24-8-39. Exit ramp control devices for divided highways.

The department of transportation shall install bidirectional control devices on all new or upgraded ramps exiting from any divided highway within this state. These devices shall be placed at the end of each ramp and shall conform with § 2E-41 of the manual for uniform traffic control devices. The device shall have red and white raised pavement markers that show red to drivers travelling the wrong way and white to drivers travelling the right way.

History of Section. P.L. 1986, ch. 54 § 1.

24-8-40. Woonsocket Lincoln Industrial Highway.

State highway ninety-nine (99) within the town of Lincoln shall henceforth be known as the “Woonsocket Lincoln Industrial Highway.”

History of Section. P.L. 1988, ch. 206, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 312, § 1.

24-8-41. David Spicer Bridge.

That part of Route 95 within the city of Providence presently known only as the Route 95 Viaduct shall henceforth be known as the David Spicer Bridge.

History of Section. P.L. 1989, ch. 550, § 1.

24-8-42. Emergency management — Lane clearance.

  1. Whenever any public safety agency through the legitimate exercise of its police powers determines that an emergency is caused by the immobilization of any vehicle(s) on the interstate system or limited access highway, as defined in § 31-1-23(e) , resulting in lane blockage and posing a threat to public safety, public safety agencies and those acting at their direction or request shall have emergency authority to move the immobilized vehicle(s).
  2. There shall be no liability incurred by any state or local public safety department or agents directed by them whether those agents are public safety personnel or not for damages incurred to the immobilized vehicle(s), its contents or surrounding area caused by the emergency measures employed through the legitimate exercise of the police powers vested in that agency to move the vehicle(s) for the purpose of clearing the lane(s) to remove any threat to public safety.

History of Section. P.L. 1992, ch. 202, § 1; P.L. 2006, ch. 216, § 5.

24-8-43. Alteration of roadways.

  1. Any person, firm or corporation including utilities and contractors who or that alter a roadway that is subject to the provisions of this chapter shall restore that portion of the roadway that was altered to the same or better condition that existed prior to alteration or as required in accordance with the state or municipal permit requirements. Repaving and repair of a roadway by a public utility or utility facility shall be in accordance with and subject to the provisions of chapter 2.2 of title 39.
  2. Any alteration of roadways that creates a public safety concern, as determined by the public safety official of the municipality or the state, including the need to move utility poles, shall be corrected by the contractor and/or utility within thirty (30) days of being notified in writing of such public safety concern by the director of the department of transportation.
  3. Restoration of any altered roadway shall commence immediately after the completion of the alteration and shall include, if necessary, temporary or intermediate restoration on an ongoing basis to keep the roadway smooth and bump free until the permanent restoration can be completed.
  4. Where the alteration involves the installation or upgrading of a traffic signal(s), the signal(s) shall not be activated until the alteration has been substantially completed, as determined by the director of the department of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1992, ch. 335, § 2; P.L. 2005, ch. 308, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 170, § 3; P.L. 2019, ch. 234, § 3.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2019, ch. 170, § 3, and P.L. 2019, ch. 234, § 3 enacted identical amendments to this section.

24-8-44. Gainer Dam bridge and roadway.

The department of transportation shall have full charge and control of the maintenance of the Gainer Dam bridge and roadway, a section of route 12 crossing the Gainer Dam and Scituate Reservoir, and the bridge and roadway are hereby made part of the state highway system. The department of transportation shall appoint such attendants and other employees as may be required for the care and maintenance of the bridge and roadway, and exercise full authority. All appropriations for the care, maintenance, and repair of the bridge and roadway shall be expended under the direction of the department of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1995, ch. 87, § 1; P.L. 1995, ch. 172, § 1.

24-8-45. Steel plate use.

  1. The director of the department of transportation shall establish rules and regulations for the use of steel plates on roadway surfaces used to protect an excavation. At a minimum, the rules and regulations shall consider steel plates designed for the safety of vehicles and pedestrians to include:
    1. Steel plates shall withstand traffic loading without movement;
    2. When two (2) or more steel plates are used, the plates shall be welded in a manner to eliminate vertical movement;
    3. All steel plates shall be marked with the utility or contractor name and contact information;
    4. Steel plates shall be installed to extend a minimum of eighteen inches (18") beyond the edge of the excavation;
    5. Temporary paving with a cold asphalt mix or installation of other suitably manufactured equipment shall be used to feather the edges of the plate to form a wedged taper to cover the edges of the steel plate;
    6. Each corner of the steel plate shall be marked with durable and highly reflective white pavement marking tape no less than four inches (4") in width;
    7. The exposed surface area of the steel plate shall be slip resistant when required by the DPW director or other appropriate municipal approval authority; and
    8. All signage advising motorists of the steel plate shall be in compliance with the current edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
  2. The director of the department of transportation may authorize use of steel plates on roadway surfaces that fail to comply with subsection (a) in an emergency situation or for public safety purposes.

History of Section. P.L. 2019, ch. 184, § 2; P.L. 2019, ch. 253, § 2.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2019, ch. 184, § 2, and P.L. 2019, ch. 253, § 2 enacted identical versions of this section.

Chapter 8.1 Relocation of Utility Services

24-8.1-1. Declaration of policy.

The general assembly hereby finds and declares that the services rendered by utilities owned by private corporations, private companies, municipalities, political subdivisions, authorities, or agencies of the state are necessary to the public health, welfare, and safety and that any payments made to such utilities for the costs of state initiated relocation thereof incident to the construction of highway projects on the federal aid primary or secondary systems or on the national system of interstate and defense highways, including extensions thereof, are for a public purpose.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 50, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 148, § 1.

24-8.1-2. Relocation of utility facilities necessitated by highway construction.

Notwithstanding any provision of law or of any charter or statute, general or special, to the contrary, whenever state initiated relocation of utility facilities in the state, owned by private corporations, private companies, municipalities, political subdivisions, authorities, or agencies of the state, whether within or without the limits of public ways, shall become necessary in connection with a highway project on the federal aid primary or secondary systems or on the national system of interstate and defense highways, including extensions thereof, for which the state shall be entitled under any law of the United States to reimbursement from federal funds for any portion of the cost of the project, then the state may order the relocation of the utility facilities, and the private corporation, private company, municipality, political subdivision, agencies of the state, or authority owning or operating the facilities shall promptly relocate the facilities in accordance with the order and the state shall pay the cost of the relocation to the utility as part of the cost of the federally aided highway project. The state shall pay a reasonable amount to private corporations and private companies for the relocation of utilities commencing with highway projects that are authorized for construction after March 1, 1976.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 50, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 148, § 1.

Collateral References.

Constitutionality of state legislation to reimburse public utilities for cost of relocating their facilities because of highway construction, conditioned upon federal reimbursement of the state under the terms of Federal-Aid Highway Act (23 USCS § 123). 75 A.L.R.2d 419.

24-8.1-2.1. Relocation necessitated by sewer construction.

Notwithstanding any provision of law or of any charter or statute, general or special, to the contrary, whenever the relocation of utility facilities in the state, owned by private corporations, private companies, municipalities, political subdivisions, authorities, or agencies of the state, whether within or without the limits of public ways, shall become necessary in connection with a sewer construction project, for which the state shall be entitled under any law of the United States to reimbursement from federal funds for any portion of the cost of the project, then the municipality or sewerage district commission undertaking the project may require the relocation of the utility facilities, and the private corporation, private company, municipality, political subdivision, agencies of the state, or authority owning or operating such facilities shall promptly relocate the facilities and the state shall pay the state and federal share, if eligible, of the cost of the relocation to the utility as part of the cost of the federally aided sewer construction project.

History of Section. P.L. 1982, ch. 346, § 1.

24-8.1-3. “Utility facilities” defined.

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “utility facilities” includes the systems owned by private corporations, private companies, municipalities, political subdivisions, authorities or agencies of the state furnishing water, sewage disposal, telephone, telegraph, or other communication, electric, or gas services within this state and all plant and equipment comprised therein without regard to whether or not the furnishing of such services is subject to regulation under the provisions of title 39, provided further that all private corporations and private companies coming within the scope of this chapter shall be regulated by title 39.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 50, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 148, § 1.

24-8.1-3.1. “As built” plans required.

Each utility shall submit to the department of transportation a complete set of “as-built” plans, within sixty (60) days of the installation of new utility facilities, or within sixty (60) days of the relocation of existing utility facilities that affect state roads.

History of Section. P.L. 1999, ch. 378, § 1.

24-8.1-4. “Costs of relocation” defined.

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “cost of relocation” includes the entire amount paid by the private corporations, private companies, municipality, authorities or agency of the state, or authority, properly and reasonably attributable to relocation, after deducting therefrom any increase in the value of the new facility and any salvage value derived from the old facility. The amount of reimbursement for the cost of relocation shall not be reduced by any expired service life of the old facility.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 50, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 148, § 1; P.L. 1986, ch. 49, § 1.

24-8.1-5. Public utility and other acts unaffected.

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to repeal, abridge, or modify the provisions of the Public Utilities Act, compiled in title 39, or any related acts now in force.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 50, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 60.

Chapter 9 Storm Emergency Account

24-9-1. Purpose of chapter.

While appropriations adequate to meet the normal average needs of the department of transportation in the performance of its duties relating to maintenance of roads and related matters are annually made in legislation appropriating funds for each fiscal year, the general assembly recognizes the necessity for anticipating and making advance provision to care for the unusual and extraordinary burdens imposed on the department by reason of extreme climatic phenomena and other emergencies. For these purposes, it is the intention of the general assembly to forearm the department, vesting it with adequate power and authority within the limitation of available funds in the storm emergency account to meet any such emergency.

History of Section. P.L. 1945, ch. 1644, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-9-1 .

24-9-2. Emergency account established.

There is hereby established a special account to be known as the storm emergency account. The governor may from time to time in the event of any emergency, within the purview of this chapter, allocate funds to the account, which shall be available for expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1945, ch. 1644, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-9-2 .

24-9-3. Emergency expenditures.

Whenever any extreme climatic phenomena or other unpredictable emergency shall in the considered judgment of the director of transportation, impose upon the department of transportation extraordinary duties relating to maintenance of roads or related matters, not foreseeable by the director at the time of submitting budget estimates for the department, the director may meet such emergencies by employing for the duration of the emergencies additional personnel, and by hiring or otherwise acquiring all necessary appliances and equipment.

History of Section. P.L. 1945, ch. 1644, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-9-3 .

24-9-4. Payments from emergency account.

All obligations and expenses incurred by the director in the exercise of the powers and duties vested in the director by the foregoing provisions of this chapter shall be paid by the general treasurer out of available funds in the storm emergency account; and the state controller is hereby authorized and directed to draw his or her orders upon the general treasurer for the payment of the sum, or so much thereof as may be required, upon receipt by the state controller of proper vouchers duly approved by the director of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1945, ch. 1644, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-9-4 .

24-9-5. Liberal construction — Powers additional.

The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed in order to accomplish the purposes hereof and to permit the director to adequately cope with any emergency which may arise, as provided in this chapter; and the powers herein vested in the director of transportation shall be construed as being in addition to all other powers presently vested in him or her, and not in derogation of any existing powers.

History of Section. P.L. 1945, ch. 1644, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 24-9-5 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 61.

Chapter 10 Freeways

24-10-1. “Freeway” defined.

A “freeway” is a way especially designed for through traffic over which abutters have no easement or right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts upon the way.

History of Section. P.L. 1937, ch. 2537, § 1; G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-1 .

Comparative Legislation.

Limited access ways:

Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 13a-1(a), 13a-73(f), 13a-98a, 13a-123, 13a-143, 13a-248, 14-238a.

Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 81, § 7C et seq.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Effect of Section.

Section merely limited abutting property owner rights and presupposed a freeway as a highway within § 31-14-2 . State v. Sprague, 113 R.I. 351 , 322 A.2d 36, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1186 (1974).

Right of Access.

Abutters to state highways have a right of access to those highways, but there is no similar right of access for abutters of freeways. Fuller v. Rahill, 120 R.I. 832 , 391 A.2d 103, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 732 (1978).

Collateral References.

Accidents arising from merger of traffic on limited access highway with that from service road or ramp. 40 A.L.R.3d 1429.

Use of property by public as affecting acquisition of title by adverse possession. 56 A.L.R.3d 1182.

24-10-2. Jurisdiction over freeways.

The director of transportation shall have full power and authority to lay out, establish, acquire, open, construct, improve, maintain, discontinue, and regulate the use of freeways within this state in the same manner or manners in which the director may now lay out, establish, acquire, open, construct, improve, maintain, discontinue, and regulate the use of highways within this state. The director shall also have any and all other additional authority and power relative to such freeways as he or she now possesses relative to highways, including the authority and power to acquire or accept title to the lands or rights-of-way needed for freeways.

History of Section. P.L. 1937, ch. 2537, § 2; G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 2; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-2 .

Cross References.

Functions of department of transportation, §§ 37-5-1 , 37-5-2 , 42-13-2 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Damages.

There was no error where the trial court carefully instructed the jury on the latitude wherein they might consider widely disparate expert testimony concerning the amount of damages due upon the taking of land for highway and freeway purposes. Palazzolo v. Rahill, 121 R.I. 31 , 394 A.2d 690, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 748 (1978).

24-10-3. Extinguishment of easements — Regulation of access.

Where an existing highway has been designated as or included within a freeway by the director, existing easements of access, light or air may be extinguished by purchase or by taking under eminent domain, in accordance with any existing method now exercised by the director in purchasing or taking land for highway purposes. Access to the freeway from any existing highway, road or street may be regulated and restricted by the director. Access to the freeway from any new highway, road or street shall be subject to the consent and approval of the director.

History of Section. P.L. 1937, ch. 2537, § 3; G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 3; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-3 .

Cross References.

Traffic on limited access roadways, §§ 31-15-14 , 31-15-15 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Compensation for Extinguishment.

The extinguishment of easements of access, in whole or in part, to land abutting an existing highway by inclusion of the existing highway within a freeway line is compensable as an exercise of the power of eminent domain. Aust v. Marcello, 112 R.I. 381 , 310 A.2d 758, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 996 (1973).

Water Rights.

Although this section does not mention water rights, where the state took property under eminent domain it did, under § 37-6-5 , take the flowage rights appurtenant to such land, and a document issued by the state seven years after the taking could not affect the extent of the rights taken. Ronci Mfg. Co. v. State, 121 R.I. 903 , 403 A.2d 1094, 1979 R.I. LEXIS 2038 (1979).

Although the state by taking property by eminent domain acquired the flowage rights appurtenant to that land resulting from the damming of a stream, the owner of the land on which the dam was located retained a right of flowage over the land acquired by the state where the state did not condemn the land on which the dam was located. Ronci Mfg. Co. v. State, 121 R.I. 903 , 403 A.2d 1094, 1979 R.I. LEXIS 2038 (1979).

Collateral References.

Abutting owner’s loss of access due to limited-access road. 43 A.L.R.2d 1072, 42 A.L.R.3d 13, 42 A.L.R.3d 148.

Measure and element of damage for limitation of access caused by conversion of conventional road into limited access highway. 42 A.L.R.3d 148.

Power to directly regulate or prohibit abutter’s access to street or highway. 73 A.L.R.2d 652.

Power to restrict or interfere with access or abutter by traffic regulations. 73 A.L.R.2d 689.

24-10-4. Commercial enterprises prohibited.

No commercial enterprise involving the sale or distribution of any commodity or product used in, or for the servicing of, any motor vehicle shall be authorized or conducted by the director of transportation or by any agency or officer of the state, within or on the property acquired for or designated as a freeway, as defined in this chapter.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 4; P.L. 1949, ch. 2392, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-4 .

24-10-5. Fuel and service facilities adjacent to freeways.

  1. In order to permit the establishment of adequate fuel and other service facilities by private owners or their lessees for the users of a freeway, the director of transportation shall provide for access roads within the state’s right-of-way of any freeway established or designated as provided in this chapter, at points which in his or her opinion, will best serve the public interest.
  2. The location of fuel and other service facilities may be indicated to the users of the freeway by appropriate sign, the size, style, and specifications of which shall be determined by the director of transportation.

History of Section. G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 4; P.L. 1949, ch. 2392, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-5 .

24-10-6. Chapter supplemental.

This chapter shall be considered supplementary and in addition to any and all other powers now exercised by the director of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1937, ch. 2537, § 4; G.L. 1938, ch. 75, § 4; impl. am. P.L. 1939, ch. 660, § 100; redesignated § 5 by P.L. 1949, ch. 2392, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-10-6 .

24-10-7 — 24-10-16. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1963, ch. 155, §§ 1, 2; Repealed by P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 2, effective May 6, 1966. For present law, see §§ 24-10.1-1 24-10.1-12 .

Compiler’s Notes.

Former §§ 24-10-7 — 24-10-16 concerned outdoor advertising.

24-10-17. Soliciting rides in motor vehicles.

  1. Any person who endeavors by words, gestures, or otherwise to beg, invite, or secure transportation in any motor vehicle on any freeway within the state, except in the case of a bona fide emergency or in the case of sickness, is subject to fines enumerated in § 31-41.1-4 .
  2. Any person who endeavors to solicit a ride in a motor vehicle in the manner described in this section on the traveled portion of any other public highway in this state shall be subject to fines enumerated in § 31-41.1-4 .

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 69, § 1; P.L. 2002, ch. 58, § 1; P.L. 2002, ch. 292, § 102; P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 4; P.L. 2021, ch. 49, § 1, effective June 14, 2021; P.L. 2021, ch. 50, § 1, effective June 11, 2021.

Compiler's Notes.

P.L. 2021, ch. 49, § 1, and P.L. 2021, ch. 50, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Applicability.

P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 19 provides that the amendment to this section by that act takes effect July 1, 2008, and shall apply to all offenses committed on July 1, 2008 and thereafter.

24-10-18. Backing up prohibited.

Any person who backs up a motor vehicle on a roadway or shoulder of any freeway within the state, shall be subject to fines enumerated in § 31-41.1-4 .

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 115, § 1; P.L. 2006, ch. 216, § 63; P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 4; P.L. 2021, ch. 49, § 1, effective June 14, 2021; P.L. 2021, ch. 50, § 1, effective June 11, 2021.

Compiler's Notes.

P.L. 2021, ch. 49, § 1, and P.L. 2021, ch. 50, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Applicability.

P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 19 provides that the amendment to this section by that act takes effect July 1, 2008, and shall apply to all offenses committed on July 1, 2008 and thereafter.

24-10-19. Advertising motor vehicles for sale on state highways.

Any person who parks a motor vehicle in a designated parking area provided by the state for a period in excess of twelve (12) hours, for the purpose of advertising the vehicle for sale shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100).

History of Section. P.L. 1993, ch. 279, § 1.

24-10-20. Park and ride lots.

Park and ride lots, also known as fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities, are facilities which are intended to be used for the temporary parking of passenger vehicles and which are located and designed so as to facilitate the safe and convenient transfer of persons traveling in passenger vehicles to and from high occupancy vehicles and/or public mass transportation systems including rail. Any other vehicle parked and/or property, including but not limited to, boats or commercial type trailer boxes, stored at those lots will be fined and towed at owner’s expense. State and local law enforcement officials have authority to ticket and tow any vehicles under this statute. Violations of this section are subject to fines enumerated in § 31-41.1-4 .

History of Section. P.L. 2000, ch. 223, § 1; P.L. 2006, ch. 216, § 63; P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 4.

Applicability.

P.L. 2008, ch. 100, art. 12, § 19 provides that the amendment to this section by that act takes effect July 1, 2008, and shall apply to all offenses committed on July 1, 2008 and thereafter.

Chapter 10.1 Outdoor Advertising

24-10.1-1. Declaration of policy.

In order to prevent unreasonable distraction of operators of motor vehicles, to prevent confusion with respect to compliance with traffic lights, signs, signals and regulations, to promote the safety, convenience, and enjoyment of travel upon highways within this state and to protect the public investment therein, to preserve and enhance the natural scenic beauty or aesthetic features of the highways and adjacent areas, and in the general welfare of the people of this state, the general assembly declares it to be the policy of this state that the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising in areas adjacent to the rights-of-way of the interstate, primary, secondary road systems within this state shall be regulated in accordance with the terms of this chapter and the regulations promulgated by the director of transportation pursuant thereto and finds that all outdoor advertising which does not conform to the requirements of this chapter is a public nuisance. It is the intention of the general assembly in this chapter to provide a statutory basis for regulation of outdoor advertising consistent with the public policy relating to areas adjacent to the interstate and primary highway systems as declared by congress in title 23 of the United States Code, Highways. Further, the general assembly declares the policy also to regulate other roads within the state.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 70; P.L. 1990, ch. 305, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

In General.

As reflected in R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-1 , Rhode Island Outdoor Advertising Act (RIOAA), R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-1 et seq., was adopted to control the effects of billboards and signs along the interstate and primary highway system and presumably to ensure receipt of federal highway funds. Vono v. Lewis, 594 F. Supp. 2d 189, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6948 (D.R.I. 2009).

Collateral References.

Attracting people in such numbers as to obstruct access to neighboring premises, as nuisance. 2 A.L.R.2d 437.

Billboards and other outdoor advertising signs as civil nuisance. 38 A.L.R.3d 647.

24-10.1-2. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Information center” means an area or site established and maintained as safety rest areas for the purpose of informing the public of places of interest within the state and providing such other information as the director of transportation may consider desirable.
  2. “Interstate system” means that portion of the national system of interstate and defense highways located within this state, as officially designated, or as may hereafter be so designated, by the director of transportation, and approved pursuant to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, Highways.
    1. “Maintenance” means the normal repair of outdoor advertising due to wear and tear. Maintenance shall not include the relocation nor the increase of advertisement size nor height. Maintenance shall not permit any alterations such as the addition of face lighting nor lit panels, moving parts, sparkling surfaces, cutouts nor temporary extensions of advertising space.
    2. Maintenance shall permit the change in the advertisement copy by means of trivision technology or other equivalent technology approved by the department of transportation and, if necessary, the federal highway administration; provided, however, for each sign using such technology two (2) valid permits for signs of equivalent size shall be required. Provided, further, however, that in the event that a person, firm or corporation does not hold more than one permit, only one permit for signs of equivalent size shall be required.
  3. “Outdoor advertising” means an outdoor sign, display, light, device, figure, painting, drawing, message, plaque, poster, billboard, structure, or other thing which is designed, intended or used to advertise or inform, any part of the advertising or information contents of which is visible from any place on the main-traveled way of the interstate, primary, or secondary systems.
  4. “Primary systems” means that portion of connected main highways, as officially designated, or as may hereafter be so designated, by the director of transportation, pursuant to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, Highways.
  5. “Safety rest area” means an area or site established and maintained within or adjacent to the right-of-way by or under public supervision or control, for the convenience of the traveling public.
  6. “Secondary systems” means that portion of state maintained roads that are neither interstate nor primary roads.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1990, ch. 305, § 1; P.L. 1992, ch. 440, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Outdoor Advertising.

Rhode Island Outdoor Advertising Act (RIOAA), broadly defines outdoor advertising to include advertising or information, at R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-2(4) , a definition that reasonably can be said to encompass both commercial and noncommercial speech. In practice, however, the RIOAA’s on-premise/off-premise distinction does not allow any noncommercial speech wherever a commercial message would be permissible. Vono v. Lewis, 594 F. Supp. 2d 189, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6948 (D.R.I. 2009).

24-10.1-3. Limitations of outdoor advertising devices.

No outdoor advertising shall be erected in this state except the following:

  1. Directional and other official signs and notices erected, maintained, or authorized by a public agency or body, which signs and notices shall include, but not be limited to, signs and notices pertaining to natural wonders and scenic and historic attractions, as authorized or required by law.
  2. Signs, displays, and devices advertising the sale or lease of property upon which they are located, subject, however, to the national standards as promulgated pursuant to the federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965.
  3. Signs, displays, and devices advertising activities conducted on the property upon which they are located, subject, however, to the national standards as promulgated pursuant to the federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965 including spacing requirements of the Rhode Island department of transportation rules and regulations governing outdoor advertising, except for signs that are allowed to be relocated as permitted in subsection (5).
  4. Bus shelters erected under the authority of the state department of transportation or Rhode Island public transit authority which shall be permitted no more than one two (2) sided sign. Each sign face shall be no more than twenty-four (24) square feet in size.
  5. Lawfully permitted signs, displays, and devices already in existence may be relocated to other permitted locations with the approval of the appropriate governmental agency(s), provided that the relocated outdoor advertising remains the same or smaller in size, and that such outdoor advertising conforms and is consistent with the municipal comprehensive plan and related zoning requirements.
  6. This chapter shall not preclude the maintenance of existing outdoor advertising.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1968, ch. 268, § 1; P.L. 1990, ch. 305, § 1.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Constitutionality.

Rhode Island Outdoor Advertising Act (RIOAA), R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-1 et seq., violated the First Amendment because its distinction between on-premise signs, as defined by R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-3(3) , and off-premise signs was an impermissible content-based restriction on speech. Vono v. Lewis, 594 F. Supp. 2d 189, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6948 (D.R.I. 2009).

In General.

Rhode Island Outdoor Advertising Act (RIOAA), R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-1 et seq., begins with a sweeping prohibition against “outdoor advertising” everywhere in the state, and then carves out a series of broad exceptions to the prohibition at R.I. Gen. Laws § 24-10.1-3 . Vono v. Lewis, 594 F. Supp. 2d 189, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6948 (D.R.I. 2009).

Jurisdiction of Local Zoning Board of Review.

The vesting in the director of public works (now director of transportation) of the regulation of outdoor advertising falling within the exceptions contained in subdivisions (a), (d), and (e) of this section does not deprive a local zoning board of review of jurisdiction over a petition for a variance from the zoning ordinance to permit erection of a billboard on real estate adjacent to an interstate highway. Standish-Johnson Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Review, 103 R.I. 487 , 238 A.2d 754, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 820 (1968).

Collateral References.

Validity and construction of ordinance prohibiting roof signs. 76 A.L.R.3d 1162.

Validity and construction of provision prohibiting or regulating advertising sign overhanging street or sidewalk. 80 A.L.R.3d 687.

Validity and construction of state or local regulation prohibiting off-premises advertising structures. 80 A.L.R.3d 486.

Validity and construction of state or local regulation prohibiting the erection or maintenance of advertising structures within a specified distance of street or highway. 81 A.L.R.3d 564.

Validity of regulations restricting height of free standing advertising by motels, motor courts, and the like. 56 A.L.R.3d 1207.

24-10.1-4. Regulation of advertising.

The director of transportation is hereby authorized to promulgate regulations governing the issuance of permits for the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising coming within the exceptions contained in subsections (1), (4) and (5) of § 24-10.1-3 consistent with the safety and welfare of the traveling public, and as may be necessary to carry out the policy of the state declared in this chapter, and consistent with the national standards promulgated by the secretary of commerce pursuant to title 23, United States Code. All permit fees collected pursuant to regulations promulgated under this section shall be deposited in the intermodal surface transportation fund.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 2002, ch. 65, art. 13, § 2.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Jurisdiction of Local Zoning Board of Review.

The vesting in the director of public works (now director of transportation) of the regulation of outdoor advertising falling within the exceptions contained in subdivisions (a), (d), and (e) of § 24-10.1-3 does not deprive a local zoning board of review of jurisdiction over a petition for a variance from the zoning ordinance to permit erection of a billboard on real estate adjacent to an interstate highway. Standish-Johnson Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Review, 103 R.I. 487 , 238 A.2d 754, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 820 (1968).

24-10.1-5. Removal of nonconforming advertising.

Any sign, display, or device lawfully in existence along the interstate system or the primary system on May 6, 1966 and which is not in conformity with the provisions contained in this chapter shall not be required to be removed until July 1, 1970. Any other sign, display, or device lawfully erected which does not conform to this chapter shall not be required to be removed until the end of the fifth year after it becomes nonconforming.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 62.

Collateral References.

Classification and maintenance of advertising structures as nonconforming use. 80 A.L.R.2d 630.

24-10.1-6. Compensation for removal of advertising.

  1. Any person, firm, association, or corporation having any property interest either in any real property upon which is located any prohibited advertising sign, display, or device, or having any property interest in any prohibited advertising sign, display, or device, or having any property interest in both, shall be justly compensated by the director of transportation for any damages sustained by reason of the removal of the following prohibited advertising signs, displays, and devices:
    1. Those lawfully in existence as of May 6, 1966.
    2. Those lawfully on any highway made a part of the interstate or primary system on or after May 6, 1966 and before January 1, 1968.
    3. Those lawfully erected on or after January 1, 1968.
  2. Compensation is authorized to be paid only for the following:
    1. The taking, by virtue of the enactment of this chapter, from the owner of a prohibited sign, display or device of all right, title, leasehold, and interest in the sign, display or device; and
    2. The taking, by virtue of the enactment of this chapter, from the owner of the real property on which the prohibited sign, display, or device is located, of the right to erect and maintain such signs, displays, and devices thereon.
  3. Any person or party so entitled to compensation who cannot agree with the director of transportation as to the amount of just compensation to which he or she is so entitled, by virtue of the enactment of this chapter, may within one year from the time that the removal of such advertising is required apply for the damages to the superior court in accordance with the procedures of §§ 37-6-18 through 37-6-23 .

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1968, ch. 268, § 2.

Collateral References.

Determination of just compensation for condemnation of billboards or other advertising signs. 73 A.L.R.3d 1122.

24-10.1-7. Unlawful advertising.

Any advertising device which violates the provisions of this chapter is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. The director of transportation shall give thirty (30) days’ notice, by certified mail, postage prepaid, to the owner of the land on which the advertising device is located to remove the device if it is a prohibited device or cause it to conform to regulations if it is an authorized device. If the owner of the property fails to act within thirty (30) days as required in the notice, the director of transportation, or any of the director’s authorized subordinates, may enter upon the real property where the outdoor advertising is located and abate and remove it.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1.

24-10.1-8. Penalty.

Any person, firm, corporation, or association who shall violate any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than five hundred dollars ($500).

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1.

24-10.1-9. Interpretation.

  1. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to abrogate or affect the provisions of any lawful ordinance, regulation or resolution, which are more restrictive than the provisions of this chapter.
  2. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter or the general or public laws to the contrary, the director of the department of transportation shall not regulate any on-premise or off-premise non-commercial protected speech contained within any advertising display authorized by this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1; P.L. 1990, ch. 305, § 1; P.L. 2010, ch. 202, § 1; P.L. 2010, ch. 234, § 1.

24-10.1-10. Advertising in safety rest areas.

In order to provide information in the specific interest of the traveling public, the director of transportation is hereby authorized to maintain maps and to permit informational directories and advertising pamphlets to be made available at safety rest areas, and to establish information centers at safety rest areas for the purpose of informing the public of places of interest within the state and providing such other information as may be considered desirable.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1.

24-10.1-11. Agreements with the United States authorized.

The director of transportation is hereby authorized to enter into agreements with the United States secretary of commerce as provided by title 23, United States Code, relating to the control of outdoor advertising in areas adjacent to the interstate and primary systems, including the establishment of information centers at safety rest areas, and to take action in the name of the state to comply with the terms of such an agreement.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1.

24-10.1-12. Severability.

If any section, clause, or provision of this chapter shall be held either unconstitutional or ineffective in whole or in part, to the extent that it is not unconstitutional or ineffective, it shall be valid and effective and no other section, clause or provision shall on account thereof be termed invalid or ineffective.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 117, § 1.

Chapter 11 Jamestown Ferry [Repealed.]

24-11-1 — 24-11-29. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1958, ch. 195, §§ 1, 4-10; P.L. 1960, ch. 25, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 63; Repealed by P.L. 2005, ch. 20, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 27, § 1, effective May 5, 2005.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former §§ 24-11-1 — 24-11-29 concerned the Jamestown ferry.

Former §§ 24-11-1 — 24-11-21 (P.L. 1951, ch. 2674, §§ 1-9; P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; P.L. 1956, ch. 3771, § 1), concerning the Jamestown ferry authority, are deemed repealed by P.L. 1958, ch. 195, § 12, subject to the saving clause in § 24-11-28, effective May 22, 1958. Section 12 of P.L. 1958, ch. 195 read in part “chapter 24-11 of the general laws and all other acts and parts of acts inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed”.

Chapter 12 Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority

24-12-1. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context shall indicate another or different meaning:

  1. “Additional facility” means any bridge, approach or feeder road, highway, road, freeway, tunnel, overpass, underpass, parking facility or toll facility, in the state, equipment or signal and information system, which the authority is authorized by this chapter or any other law to construct, reconstruct, renovate, acquire, maintain, repair, operate, or manage after May 3, 1954 or any portion thereof.
  2. “Annual period” means the one-year fiscal period of the state commencing on the first day of July of any year and ending the last day of June of the following year.
  3. “Authority” means the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority created by § 24-12-2 , or, if the authority shall be abolished, the board, body, or commission succeeding to the principal functions thereof or upon whom the powers given by the chapter to the authority shall be given by law.
    1. “Cost” as applied to any project to be constructed, reconstructed, renovated, maintained, acquired, leased, repaired, operated or managed by the authority shall embrace the cost of construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, the cost of the acquisition of all land, rights-of-way, property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the authority for the construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, the cost of demolishing or removing any buildings or structures on land so acquired, including the cost of acquiring any lands to which the buildings or structures may be moved, the cost of all machinery and equipment, financing charges, interest prior to and during construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, and for one year after completion of construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, cost of traffic estimates and of engineering and legal services, plans, specifications, surveys, estimates of cost and of revenues, other expenses necessary or incident to determining the feasibility or practicability of construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, administrative expenses, and such other expenses as may be necessary or incident to the construction, reconstruction, renovation, maintenance, repair, operation or management, the financing of the construction, and the placing of the project in operation, and in connection with the Newport Bridge shall include the purchase price of the ferry franchise. The word “cost” as applied to any project which the authority may be authorized to acquire means the amount of the purchase price, lease payments, debt service payments, or the amount of any condemnation award in connection with the acquisition of the project, and shall include the cost of acquiring all the capital stock of the corporation owning the project, if such be the case, and the amount to be paid to discharge all of the obligations of the corporation in order to vest title to the project in the authority, the cost of improvements to the project which may be determined by the authority to be necessary prior to the financing thereof, interest during the period of construction of the improvements and for one year thereafter, the cost of all lands, properties, rights, easements, franchises, and permits acquired, the cost of engineering and legal services, plans, specifications, surveys, estimates of cost and of revenues, other expenses necessary or incident to determining the feasibility or practicability of the acquisition or improvement, administrative expenses, and such other expenses as may be necessary or incident to the financing of the acquisition or improvement and the placing of the project in operation by the authority.
    2. “Cost” as applied to the Mount Hope Bridge means such amount, if any, as the authority may deem necessary, following the acquisition of a bridge under the provisions of § 24-12-40A , to place the bridge in safe and efficient condition for its operation. And as applied to any project constructed or acquired by the authority under the provisions of the chapter, the word “cost” shall also include such amounts as the authority may deem necessary for working capital and to create a debt service reserve.
    3. “Cost” as applied to the Sakonnet River Bridge includes such amount, if any, as the authority may deem necessary, following the acquisition of the Sakonnet River Bridge under the provisions of subsection 24-12-40F , to place the bridge in safe and efficient condition for its operation. As applied to any project constructed or acquired by the authority under the provisions of the chapter, the word “cost” shall also include such amounts as the authority may deem necessary for capitalized interest, working capital and to create a debt service reserve.
    4. “Cost” as applied to the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge includes such amount, if any, as the authority may deem necessary, following the acquisition of the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge under the provisions of subsection 24-12-40G , to place the bridge in safe and efficient condition for its operation. As applied to any project constructed or acquired by the authority under the provisions of the chapter, the word “cost” shall also include such amounts as the authority may deem necessary for capitalized interest, working capital and to create a debt service reserve.
  4. “Department” means the department of transportation, or, if the department shall be abolished, the board, body, or commission succeeding to the principal functions thereof or upon whom the powers given by chapter 5 of title 37 to the department shall be given by law.
  5. “Ferry franchise” means the existing franchises and rights to operate ferries belonging to the Jamestown and Newport ferry company, but not including any other intangible personal property or real estate or tangible personal property of the corporation which shall remain the property of the corporation.
  6. “Jamestown Bridge” means the former bridge over the west passage of Narragansett Bay between the towns of Jamestown and North Kingstown constructed by the Jamestown Bridge commission under the provisions of chapter 2536 of the Public Laws, 1937 and the approaches thereto, and shall embrace all tollhouses, administration, and other buildings and structures used in connection therewith, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the Jamestown Bridge commission in connection with the construction and operation of the bridge.
  7. “Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge” means the bridge constructed in replacement of the Jamestown Bridge, as defined in subdivision (7) and the approaches thereto, and shall embrace all tollhouses, administration, and other buildings and structures used in connection therewith, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the authority in connection with the construction and operation of such bridge.
  8. “Mount Hope Bridge” means the existing bridge between the towns of Bristol and Portsmouth and the approaches thereto, which was constructed by the Mount Hope Bridge corporation and which was acquired and is now owned and operated by the Mount Hope Bridge authority under the provisions of chapter 13 of this title, and shall embrace all tollhouses, administration, and other buildings and structures used in connection therewith, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the Mount Hope Bridge corporation or the Mount Hope Bridge authority in connection with the construction and operation of the bridge.
  9. “Newport Bridge” means the bridge or tunnel or combination of bridge and tunnel constructed or to be constructed under the provisions of this chapter over or under the waters of Narragansett Bay between Conanicut Island and Aquidneck Island, shall embrace the substructure and the superstructure thereof and the approaches thereto and the entrance plazas, interchanges, overpasses, underpasses, tollhouses, administration, storage, and other buildings, and highways connecting the bridge or tunnel with the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge (defined in subdivision (8)) and with state highways as the authority may determine to construct from time to time in connection therewith, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the authority for the construction and operation of the bridge or tunnel or combination of bridge and tunnel.
  10. “Owner” means and include all individuals, incorporated companies, partnerships, societies, or associations, and also municipalities, political subdivisions, and all public agencies and instrumentalities, having any title or interest in any property, rights, easements, or franchises authorized to be acquired under the provisions of this chapter.
  11. “Project” means the “Newport Bridge,” “Mount Hope Bridge,” “Sakonnet River Bridge,” “Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge”, the “turnpike” or any “additional facility,” as the case may be, or any portion thereof which may be financed, acquired or leased under the provisions of this chapter.
  12. “Turnpike” means the controlled access highway or any portion thereof to be constructed or acquired, from time to time, under the provisions of this chapter from a point at or near the Connecticut-Rhode Island border through the county of Washington and the county of Newport to a point at or near the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border in the town of Tiverton (excluding the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Newport Bridge, and the Sakonnet River Bridge), together with all bridges (except those mentioned above), overpasses, underpasses, interchanges, entrance plazas, approaches, approach roads, tollhouses, service stations, and administration, storage, and other buildings and facilities which the authority may deem necessary for the operation of the turnpike, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests which may be acquired by the authority for the construction or the operation of the turnpike.
  13. “Sakonnet River Bridge” means the replacement Sakonnet River bridge constructed or to be constructed under the provisions of Article 36 of Chapter 376 of the Public Laws of 2003 between the towns of Tiverton and Portsmouth and shall embrace the substructure and the superstructure thereof and the approaches thereto and the toll structures, interchanges, overpasses, underpasses, tollhouses, administration, storage, and other buildings, and highways connecting the bridge with state highways, as the authority may determine to construct or acquire from time to time in connection therewith, together with all property, rights, easements, and interests acquired by the authority for the construction and operation of the bridge.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 2; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-1 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1-4; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, §§ 2-4; P.L. 1987, ch. 397, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 71; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

24-12-2. Authority created — Composition.

There is hereby created a body corporate and politic to be known as the “Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority.” The authority shall consist of five (5) members, including the director of transportation, who shall be a member ex officio, and four (4) members appointed by the governor.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-2 .

Collateral References.

Liability, in negligence action, of state highway, or turnpike authority. 62 A.L.R.2d 1222.

24-12-3. Appointment of authority members — Oath of office.

  1. During the month of March in each year, the successor of any member whose term is about to expire shall be appointed by the governor for a term of four (4) years commencing the first day of April then next ensuing, but any person appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve only for the unexpired term. Any member of the authority shall be eligible for reappointment.
  2. Each appointed member of the authority before entering upon his or her duties shall take an oath to administer the duties of his or her office faithfully and impartially, and the oath shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-3 .

24-12-4. Officers of authority — Quorum — Reimbursement of expenses of members.

  1. The authority shall elect one of its members as chairperson and another as vice-chairperson and shall also elect a secretary and a treasurer who may or may not be members of the authority. Three (3) members of the authority shall constitute a quorum and the vote of three (3) members shall be necessary for any action taken by the authority. No vacancy in the membership of the authority shall impair the right of a quorum to exercise all the rights and perform all the duties of the authority. The members of the authority shall receive no salary for their services as authority members but shall be paid their necessary expenses while engaged in the performance of their duties, and the appointed members of the authority shall be paid the sum of forty dollars ($40.00) for each day or portion thereof in which they are engaged in the performance of their duties.
  2. The secretary and the treasurer shall receive such salaries as shall be fixed by the authority from time to time.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-14-4 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 5; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 5.

24-12-5. Power to construct, reconstruct, renovate, acquire, maintain, repair, operate or manage projects or additional facilities and to issue bonds.

In order to facilitate vehicular traffic, remove many of the present handicaps and hazards on the congested highways in the state, alleviate the barriers caused by large bodies of water, and promote the agricultural and industrial development of the state, the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority is hereby authorized and empowered: to construct the Newport Bridge, the turnpike, any portion thereof or any additional facility hereafter authorized to be constructed; to acquire the Mount Hope Bridge, to acquire the Sakonnet River Bridge, to acquire the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge and any additional facility hereafter authorized to be acquired; to maintain, construct, reconstruct, renovate, acquire, repair, operate or manage any project or projects; and to issue bonds of the authority as provided in this chapter to finance any project or projects; provided, however, that the Mount Hope Bridge shall only be acquired as provided for by § 24-12-40A .

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-5 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 6; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 6; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 71; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

24-12-6. Grants or leases of state or municipal lands.

All towns, cities, and other political subdivisions and all public agencies and commissions of the state, notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, are hereby authorized and empowered to lease, lend, grant, or convey to the authority at its request, upon such terms and conditions as the proper authorities of the towns, cities, other political subdivisions or public agencies and commissions may deem reasonable and fair and without the necessity for any advertisement, order of court, or other action or formality, other than the regular and formal action of the authorities concerned, any real property which may be necessary or convenient to the effectuation of the authorized purposes of the authority, including public roads and other real property already devoted to public use, and subject to the above provisions, the state hereby consents to the use of all lands owned by it, including lands lying under water, which are deemed by the authority to be necessary for the construction or operation of any project.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 3; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-6 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

24-12-7. Revenue bonds not a debt of the state.

Revenue bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter shall not be deemed to constitute a debt of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or a pledge of the faith and credit of the state or of any political subdivision, but shall be payable solely from the funds provided therefor under the provisions of this chapter. All revenue bonds shall contain on the face thereof a statement to the effect that neither the state nor the authority shall be obligated to pay the same or the interest thereon except from the funds provided therefor under the provisions of this chapter, and that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the state or of any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the principal of or the interest on the bonds; provided, however, that any bonds issued under the provisions of § 24-12-40B of this chapter shall contain on the face thereof the statement required by § 24-12-40B .

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-7 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 7; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 7.

24-12-8. Expenses limited to funds provided.

All expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of this chapter shall be payable solely from funds provided under the provisions of this chapter and no liability or obligation shall be incurred by the authority under this chapter beyond the extent to which moneys shall have been provided under the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 4; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-8 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

24-12-9. Powers of authority.

  1. The authority is hereby authorized and empowered:
    1. To adopt bylaws for the regulation of its affairs and the conduct of its business;
    2. To adopt an official seal and alter it at pleasure;
    3. To maintain an office at such place or places within the state as it may designate;
    4. To sue and be sued in its own name, plead, and be impleaded; provided, however, that any and all actions at law or in equity against the authority shall be brought only in the county in which the principal office of the authority shall be located;
    5. To determine, subject to the approval of the director of transportation, the location and the design standards of the Newport Bridge, the turnpike, and any additional new facility to be constructed;
    6. To issue bonds of the authority for any of its purposes and to refund its bonds, all as provided in this chapter;
    7. To combine for financing purposes the Newport Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Sakonnet River Bridge, the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, the turnpike, and any additional facility or facilities, or any two (2) or more of such projects;
    8. To borrow money in anticipation of the issuance of bonds for any of its purposes and to issue notes, certificates, or other evidences of borrowing in form as may be authorized by resolution of the authority, the notes, certificates, or other evidence of borrowing to be payable in the first instance from the proceeds of any bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter and to contain on their face a statement to the effect that neither the state, the authority, nor any municipality or other political subdivision of the state shall be obligated to pay the same or the interest thereon except from the proceeds of bonds in anticipation of the issuance of which the notes, certificates, or other evidences of borrowing shall have been issued, or from revenues;
    9. To fix and revise, from time to time, subject to the provisions of this chapter, and to charge and collect tolls for transit over the turnpike and the several parts or sections thereof, and for the use of the Newport Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Sakonnet River Bridge, the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, and any additional facility acquired, financed, or leased under the provisions of this chapter;
    10. To acquire, hold, and dispose of real and personal property in the exercise of its powers and the performance of its duties;
    11. To acquire in the name of the authority, by purchase or otherwise, on such terms and conditions and in such manner as it may deem proper, or by the exercise of the rights of condemnation in the manner as provided by this chapter, public or private lands, including public parks, playgrounds, or reservations, or parts thereof or rights therein, rights-of-way, property, rights, easements, and interests as it may deem necessary for carrying out the provisions of this chapter; provided, however, that all public property damaged in carrying out the powers granted by this chapter shall be restored or repaired and placed in its original condition as nearly as practicable;
    12. To designate the locations, with the approval of the director of transportation, and establish, limit, and control the points of ingress to and egress from the turnpike and any additional facility as may be necessary or desirable in the judgment of the authority to ensure the proper operation and maintenance thereof, and to prohibit entrance to and exit from any point or points not so designated;
    13. To employ, in its discretion, consulting engineers, attorneys, accountants, construction and financial experts, superintendents, managers, and such other employees and agents as may be necessary in its judgment, and to fix their compensation;
    14. To apply for, receive, and accept from any federal agency aid and/or grants for or in aid of the repair, maintenance, and/or construction of the turnpike, the Newport Bridge, the Sakonnet River Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, or any additional facility, and to receive and accept from the state, from any municipality, or other political subdivision thereof and from any other source aid or contributions of either money, property, labor, or other things of value, to be held, used and applied only for the purposes for which the grants and contributions may be made;
    15. To construct grade separations at intersections of the turnpike, the approaches, and highway connections of the Newport Bridge, the Sakonnet River Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, and any additional facility with public highways, streets, or other public ways or places, and to change and adjust the lines and grades thereof so as to accommodate the same to the design of the grade separation; the cost of the grade separations and any damage incurred in changing and adjusting the lines and grades of the highways, streets, ways, and places shall be ascertained and paid by the authority as a part of the cost of the project;
    16. To vacate or change the location of any portion of any public highway, street, or other public way or place, sewer, pipe, main, conduit, cable, wire, tower, pole, and other equipment and appliance of the state or of any municipality or other political subdivision of the state and to reconstruct the same at such new location as the authority shall deem most favorable for the project and of substantially the same type and in as good condition as the original highway, street, way, place, sewer, pipe, main, conduit, cable, wire, tower, pole, equipment, or appliance, and the cost of the reconstruction and any damage incurred in vacating or changing the location thereof shall be ascertained and paid by the authority as a part of the cost of the project; any public highway, street, or other public way or place vacated or relocated by the authority shall be vacated or relocated in the manner provided by law for the vacation or relocation of public roads, and any damages awarded on account thereof shall be paid by the authority as a part of the cost of the project;
    17. The authority shall also have the power to make reasonable regulations, subject to the approval of the public utility administrator, for the installation, construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, relocation and removal of tracks, pipes, mains, conduits, cables, wires, towers, poles, and other equipment and appliances (herein called “public utility facilities”) of any public utility as defined in § 39-1-2 , in, on, along, over, or under any project. Whenever the authority shall determine that it is necessary that any public facilities that now are, or hereafter may be, located in, on, along, over, or under any project should be relocated in the project, or should be removed from the project, the public utility owning or operating the facilities shall relocate or remove the facilities in accordance with the order of the authority; provided, however, that the cost and expenses of the relocation or removal, including the cost of installing the facilities in a new location, or new locations, and the cost of any lands, or any rights or interests in lands, and any other rights acquired to accomplish the relocation or removal, less the cost of any lands or any rights or interests in lands or any other rights of the public utility paid to the public utility in connection with the relocation or removal of the property, shall be ascertained and paid by the authority as a part of the cost of the project. In case of any relocation or removal of facilities, the public utility owning or operating the facilities, its successors or assigns, may maintain and operate the facilities, with the necessary appurtenances, in the new location or new locations, for as long a period, and upon the same terms and conditions, as it had the right to maintain and operate the facilities in their former location or locations;
    18. To make reasonable regulations and to grant easements for the installation, construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, relocation, and removal of pipelines, other equipment, and appliances of any corporation or person owning or operating pipelines in, on, along, over, or under the turnpike, whenever the authority shall determine that it is necessary that any facilities which now are, or hereafter may be located in, on, along, over or under the turnpike should be relocated in the turnpike, or should be removed from the turnpike, the corporation or person owning or operating the facilities shall relocate or remove the facilities in accordance with the order of the authority; provided, however, that the cost and expense of the relocation or removal, including the cost of installing the facilities in a new location, or new locations, and the cost of any lands, or any rights or interests in lands, and any other rights acquired to accomplish the relocation or removal, less the cost of any lands or any rights or interests in lands or any other rights of any corporation or person paid to any corporation or person in connection with the relocation or removal of the property, shall be ascertained and paid by the authority as a part of the cost of the project. In case of any relocation or removal of facilities, the corporation or person owning or operating the facilities, its successors or assigns, may maintain and operate the facilities, with the necessary appurtenances, in the new location or new locations, for as long a period, and upon the same terms and conditions, as it had the right to maintain and operate the facilities in their former location or locations;
    19. To enter upon any lands, waters, and premises for the purpose of making such surveys, soundings, borings, and examinations as the authority may deem necessary or convenient for its purposes, and the entry shall not be deemed a trespass, nor shall an entry for such purposes be deemed an entry under any condemnation proceedings; provided, however, the authority shall pay any actual damage resulting to the lands, water, and premises as a result of the entry and activities as a part of the cost of the project;
    20. To enter into contracts or agreements with any board, commission, public instrumentality of another state or the federal government or with any political subdivision of another state relating to the connection or connections to be established between the turnpike or any additional facility with any public highway or turnpike now in existence or hereafter to be constructed in another state, and with respect to the construction, maintenance, and operation of interstate turnpikes or expressways;
    21. To enter into contracts with the department of transportation with respect to the construction, reconstruction, renovation, acquisition, maintenance, repair, operation, or management of any project and with the Rhode Island state police with respect to the policing of any project;
    22. To make and enter into all contracts and agreements necessary or incidental to the performance of its duties and the execution of its powers under this chapter; and
    23. To do all other acts and things necessary or convenient to carry out the powers expressly granted in this chapter.
    24. To grant and/or contract, through the transfer of funds of the authority to the department of transportation, for the construction, reconstruction, acquisition, maintenance, repair, operation, or management by the department of transportation of any project or projects authorized by this chapter, and the department of transportation is authorized to accept any such grant or transfer of funds.
  2. Provided, the authority, in carrying out the provisions of this section, shall hold public hearings prior to the finalization of any specifications or the awarding of any contracts for any project. Provided, further, that any revenue generated by facilities under the control of the authority shall only be used for the purposes of the authority.
  3. The authority is authorized to enter into contracts with the state, or any department of the state, to operate and/or manage toll facilities on state roads or bridges not owned, leased by, or under the control of the authority, and to collect tolls from such facilities on behalf of the department of transportation, provided such tolls shall be set by the state acting through the department of transportation pursuant to chapter 13.1 of title 42.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-9 ; P.L 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 8-10; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, §§ 8-10; P.L. 1986, ch. 139 § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3; P.L. 2016, ch. 3, § 1; P.L. 2016, ch. 4, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2016, ch. 3, § 1, and P.L. 2016, ch. 4, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Cross References.

Bridge police, § 12-2-1 et seq.

Collateral References.

Liability for negligence of public body or political subdivision operating toll bridge. 43 A.L.R.2d 550.

Measure and elements of damages for injury to bridge. 31 A.L.R.5th 171.

24-12-10. Eminent domain power.

The authority shall have the right to acquire any land, or any interest therein, by the exercise of the power of eminent domain, whenever it shall be determined by the authority that the acquisition of the land, or interest, is necessary for the construction or the operation of any project.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-10 .

24-12-11. Filing of eminent domain resolution, plat, and statement of amount offered.

The necessity for acquisition shall be conclusively presumed upon the adoption by the authority of a resolution declaring that the acquisition of the land, or interest therein, described in the resolution is necessary for the construction or operation. Within six (6) months thereafter the authority shall cause to be filed in the land evidence records of the city or town in which the land is located a copy of the resolution of the authority, together with a plat of the land, or interest therein described, and a statement, signed by the chairperson of the authority, that the lands, or interests therein, are taken pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. Thereupon the authority shall file in the superior court in and for the county in which the land, or interest therein, lies, a statement of the sum of money estimated by the authority to be just compensation for the land taken.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-11 .

24-12-12. Taking of possession of lands.

Upon the filing of the copy of the resolution, plat, and statement in the land evidence records of the city or town, the filing in the superior court, of the statement, and the depositing in the superior court, to the use of the persons entitled thereto, of such sum as the court shall determine to be amply sufficient to satisfy the claims of all persons interested in the land (and the court may, in its discretion, take evidence on the question to determine the sum to be deposited), title to the land, or interest therein, shall vest in the authority in fee simple absolute and the authority thereupon may take possession of the land, or interest therein.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-12 .

24-12-13. Deposits in court on eminent domain — Notice to owners — Agreement as to price.

No sum paid into the court as provided in § 24-12-12 shall be charged with clerk’s fees of any nature. After the filing of the copy, plat, and statement, notice of the taking of the land, or interest therein, shall be served upon the owners of and persons having an estate in and interested in the land by a member of the division of sheriffs, leaving a true and attested copy of the description and statement with each of the persons personally, or at their last and usual place of abode in this state with some person living there, and in case any of the persons are absent from this state and have no last and usual place of abode therein occupied by any person, the copy shall be left with the persons, if any, in charge of or having possession of the land, or interest therein, taken of the absent persons if the same are known to the officer; and after the filing of the resolution, plat and statement, the secretary of the authority shall cause a copy of the resolution and statement to be published in some newspaper published in the county where the land, or interest therein, may be located, at least once a week for three (3) successive weeks. If any person shall agree with the authority for the price of the land, or interest therein, so taken, the court upon the application of the parties in interest, may order that the sum agreed upon be paid immediately from the money deposited, as the just compensation to be awarded in the proceeding.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-13 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154; P.L. 2012, ch. 324, § 53.

24-12-14. Jury trial on price of land.

Any owner of or persons entitled to any estate in or interested in any part of the land, or interest therein, so taken, who cannot agree with the authority for the price of the land, or interest therein, so taken in which he or she is interested may, within three (3) months after personal notice of the taking, or, if he or she have no personal notice, may within one year from the first publication of the copy of the resolution and statement, apply by petition to the superior court in and for the county in which the land, or interest therein, lies, setting forth the taking of his or her land or interest therein, and praying for an assessment of damages by a jury. Upon filing of the petition the court shall cause twenty (20) days’ notice of the pendency thereof to be given to the authority by serving the chairperson or vice chairperson of the authority with a certified copy thereof, and may proceed after notice to the trial thereof; and the trial shall determine all questions of fact relating to the value of the land, or interest therein, and the amount thereof, and judgment shall be entered upon the verdict of the jury and execution shall be issued therefor against the money so deposited in court and in default thereof against any other property of the authority. In case two (2) or more conflicting petitioners make claim to the same land, or to any interests therein, or to different interests in the same parcel of land, the court upon motion shall consolidate their several petitions for trial at the same time by the same jury, and may frame all necessary issues for the trial thereof; and all proceedings taken pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall take precedence over all other civil matters then pending before the court, or if the superior court in and for the county in which the land, or interest therein, lies, is not in session in the county, then the matter may be heard in the superior court for the counties of Providence and Bristol.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-14 .

24-12-15. Representation of incompetent landowners.

If any lands, or interests therein, in which any infant or other person not capable in law to act in his or her own behalf is interested, are taken by the authority under the provisions of this chapter, the superior court, upon the filing therein of any petition by or in behalf of an infant or other person, may appoint a guardian ad litem for the infant or other person, and the guardian may appear and be heard in behalf of the infant or other person; and the guardian may also with the advice and consent of the superior court and upon such terms as the superior court may prescribe, release to the authority all claims for damages for the lands of the infant or other person or for any interests therein. Any lawfully appointed, qualified, and acting guardian or other fiduciary of the estate of any infant or other person, with the approval of the court of probate within this state having jurisdiction to authorize the sale of lands and properties within this state of any infant or other person, may, before the filing of any petition, agree with the authority upon the amount of damages suffered by the infant or other person by any taking of his or her lands or of his or her interests in any lands, and may, upon receiving the amount, release to the authority all claims of damages of the infant or other person for the taking.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-15 .

24-12-16. Repayment of excess deposits.

Whenever from time to time the authority has satisfied the court that the amount deposited with the court is greater than is amply sufficient to satisfy the claims of all persons interested in the land, the court may order that the amount of any excess including any interest or increment on any sums so deposited shall be repaid to the authority. Whenever the authority has satisfied the court that the claims of all persons interested in the land taken have been satisfied, the unexpended balance including any interest or increment on any sums so deposited shall be paid immediately to the authority.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-16 .

24-12-17. Expediting proceedings — Land devoted to public use — Outstanding interests.

In any proceedings for the assessment of compensation and damages for land or interest therein taken or to be taken by eminent domain by the authority the following provisions shall be applicable:

  1. At any time during the pendency of an action or proceeding, the authority or an owner may apply to the court for an order directing an owner or the authority, as the case may be, to show cause why further proceedings should not be expedited, and the court may upon the application make an order requiring that the hearings proceed and that any other steps be taken with all possible expedition.
  2. If any of the land, or interest therein, is devoted to a public use, it may nevertheless be acquired, and the taking shall be effective provided that no land or interest therein, belonging to a public utility corporation may be acquired without the approval of the administrator of public utilities or other officer or tribunal having regulatory power over the corporation. Any land, or interest therein, already acquired by the authority may nevertheless be included within the taking for the purpose of acquiring any outstanding interests in the land.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 6; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-17 .

24-12-18. Bonds.

  1. Issuance and sale of revenue bonds.  The authority is hereby authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance, at one time or in series from time to time, of revenue bonds of the authority for the purpose of paying all or a part of the cost of any one or more projects, the construction, reconstruction, renovation, acquisition, maintenance, repair, operation or management of which is authorized by this chapter, and making provision for working capital and a debt service reserve. The principal of and the interest on the bonds shall be payable solely from the funds herein provided for the payment. The bonds of each issue shall be dated, shall bear interest at such rate or rates per annum, shall mature at such time or times not exceeding fifty (50) years from their date or dates, as may be determined by the authority, and may be made redeemable before maturity, at the option of the authority, at such price or prices and under such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the authority prior to the issuance of the bonds. The authority may sell such bonds in such manner, either at public or private sale, and for such price, as it may determine to be for the best interests of the authority.
  2. Form and execution of all bonds.  The authority shall determine the form and the manner of execution of all bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter, including any interest coupons to be attached thereto, and shall fix the denomination or denominations of the bonds and the place or places of payment of the principal and interest, which may be at any bank or trust company within or without the state. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any bonds or coupons shall cease to be an officer before the delivery of the bonds, the signature or the facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if the officer had remained in office until the delivery, and any bond may bear the facsimile signature of, or may be signed by, the persons as at the actual time of the execution of the bond shall be the proper officers to sign the bond although at the date of the bond the persons may not have been the officers. The bonds may be issued in coupon or in registered form, and in certificated or book entry only form as the authority may determine, and provision may be made for the registration of any coupon bonds as to principal alone and also as to both principal and interest, for the reconversion into coupon bonds of any bonds registered as to both principal and interest, and for the interchange of registered and coupon bonds.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-18 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 11; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 11; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Approval Required for Bond Issue.

Although faith and credit of state are purportedly not pledged to the discharge of revenue bonds, the property of the state is so pledged and approval of the voters is required by R.I. Const., Amend. 31 (see now R.I. Const., art. VI, §§ 16 , 17). Opinion to Governor, 99 R.I. 351 , 208 A.2d 105, 1965 R.I. LEXIS 445 (1965).

Where ballot at election at which bond issue was approved showed the intention to issue bonds under § 24-12-40B but did not show that such approval would also authorize the issuance of revenue bonds under the provisions of this section, the issuance of such bonds was not approved as required by R.I. Const., Amend. 31 . Opinion to Governor, 99 R.I. 351 , 208 A.2d 105, 1965 R.I. LEXIS 445 (1965).

24-12-19. Use of bond proceeds — Supplementary issues — Surplus proceeds.

The proceeds of the bonds of each issue shall be used solely for the payment of the cost of the project or projects for which the bonds shall have been issued, and shall be disbursed in the manner and under the restrictions, if any, as the authority may provide in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or in the trust agreement hereinafter mentioned securing the bonds; provided, however, that the amount of the proceeds of the revenue bonds of the first series as may be determined by the authority prior to the issuance of the bonds may be applied to the payment of engineering, financing, and legal services in connection with the financing and the construction of the Newport Bridge or the turnpike or both. If the proceeds of the bonds of any issue, by error of estimates or otherwise, shall be less than the cost, additional bonds may in like manner be issued to provide the amount of the deficit, and, unless otherwise provided in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, shall be deemed to be of the same issue and shall be entitled to payment from the same fund without preference of priority of the bonds first issued. If the proceeds of the bonds of any issue shall exceed the cost, the surplus shall be deposited to the credit of the sinking fund for the bonds or, if so authorized by the authority, may be applied to the payment of the cost of any project thereafter financed under the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956; § 24-12-19 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 12.

24-12-20. Interim receipts or temporary bonds — Replacement of lost or mutilated bonds — Proceedings required by chapter exclusive.

Prior to the preparation of definitive bonds, the authority may, under like restrictions, issue interim receipts or temporary bonds, with or without coupons, exchangeable for definitive bonds when the bonds shall have been executed and are available for delivery. The authority may also provide for the replacement of any bonds which shall become mutilated or shall be destroyed or lost. Bonds may be issued under the provisions of this chapter without obtaining the consent of any department, division, commission, board, bureau, or agency of the state, and without any other proceedings or the happening of any other conditions or things than those proceedings, conditions or things which are specifically required by this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-20 .

24-12-21. Retirement of outstanding bridge revenue refunding bonds of Jamestown Bridge commission.

Within three (3) months prior to the estimated date of opening for traffic of the Newport Bridge, but not earlier than December 31, 1965, and in case provision shall not theretofore have been made for the redemption of the outstanding bridge revenue refunding bonds of the Jamestown Bridge commission through the operation of the sinking fund for the bonds, the authority may issue its revenue bonds in an amount sufficient, with other funds available for such purposes, to provide for the redemption of all of the outstanding bonds on their earliest redemption date, including the principal amount of the bonds, the premium required to be paid upon the principal amount on the redemption date and the interest to accrue on the principal amount to the redemption date, and upon there being deposited with the trustee under the trust indenture securing the outstanding bridge revenue refunding bonds an amount sufficient, with other funds available for the purpose, to provide for the redemption, all other money then held by the trustee under the trust indenture shall be transferred to the appropriate funds created under the provisions of the resolution of trust agreement securing the revenue bonds of the authority.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-21 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 13; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 12; P.L. 1965, ch. 43, § 5.

24-12-22. Purchase of Jamestown-Newport ferry franchise.

In the event revenue bonds shall be issued in an amount estimated to be sufficient with any other available funds to pay the cost of constructing the Newport Bridge and opening the bridge for traffic, there shall be deposited with a bank or banks in the city of Newport or in the city of Providence for the credit of a special account in the name of the town of Jamestown, the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) as the cost of the ferry franchise, and the money so deposited shall be held by the bank or banks in the name of the town of Jamestown for the benefit of the town until such time as the Newport Bridge shall be open for traffic. Upon the opening, the ferry franchise shall be transferred to the authority, and thereafter in consideration of the transfer of the ferry franchise, the money so deposited shall be applied, to the extent necessary, to the retirement of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the town of Jamestown incurred on account of ferry operations conducted by the Jamestown and Newport ferry company and any balance of the amount so deposited shall be paid to the treasurer of the town of Jamestown.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-22 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 14; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 13.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Validity of Section.

This section and § 24-12-24 are null and void since the purposes of their original enactment have been fulfilled. Rhode Island Turnpike & Bridge Auth. v. Jamestown, 106 R.I. 132 , 256 A.2d 479, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 603 (1969).

24-12-23. Maintenance of Jamestown-Newport ferry service.

Until the Newport Bridge shall be opened for traffic, ferry service between the town of Jamestown and the city of Newport shall be maintained by the director of transportation and upon the opening of the Newport Bridge for traffic the ferry service shall be discontinued except that the director of transportation may provide ferry service for pedestrians only. The director of transportation is hereby authorized and empowered, after the transfer of the franchise to the authority, to provide ferry service for pedestrians only as provided in this section.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-23 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 15; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 71.

24-12-24. Pension fund for ferry company employees.

The town of Jamestown, by vote of the qualified electors of the town at any special or annual financial town meeting, is hereby authorized and empowered to use all or any part of any balance of the two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) paid to the town together with the proceeds realized from the sale or lease of any of the other assets of the Jamestown and Newport ferry company for the establishment of a pension fund for the care of retired employees of the Jamestown and Newport ferry company.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 7; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-24 .

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Validity of Section.

This section and § 24-12-22 are null and void since the purposes of their original enactment have been fulfilled. Rhode Island Turnpike & Bridge Auth. v. Jamestown, 106 R.I. 132 , 256 A.2d 479, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 603 (1969).

24-12-25. Trust agreement.

In the discretion of the authority any bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter may be secured by a trust agreement by and between the authority and a corporate trustee, which may be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state. The trust agreement or the resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds may pledge or assign the tolls and other revenues to be received, but shall not convey or mortgage any project or any part thereof. The trust agreement or resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds may contain such provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and remedies of the bondholders as may be reasonable and proper and not in violation of law, including covenants setting forth the duties of the authority in relation to the acquisition of property and the construction, improvement, maintenance, repair, operation, and insurance of the project or projects in connection with which the bonds shall have been authorized, the rates of toll to be charged, the custody, safeguarding and application of all moneys, and conditions or limitations with respect to the issuance of additional bonds. It shall be lawful for any bank or trust company incorporated under the laws of the state which may act as depositary of the proceeds of bonds or of revenues to furnish the indemnifying bonds or to pledge such securities as may be required by the authority. Any trust agreement may set forth the rights and remedies of the bondholders and of the trustee, and may restrict the individual right of action by bondholders. In addition to the foregoing, any trust agreement or resolution may contain such other provisions as the authority may deem reasonable and proper for the security of the bondholders. All expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of the trust agreement or resolution may be treated as a part of the authority’s cost of operation and maintenance.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 8; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-25 .

24-12-26. Power to collect tolls and charges — Gasoline and service concessions.

  1. The authority is hereby authorized, subject to the provisions of this chapter, to fix, revise, charge and collect tolls for the use of the Newport Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the turnpike and the different parts or sections thereof, and for the use of any additional facility and the different parts or sections thereof, and to contract with any person, partnership, association or corporation for placing on any project telephone, telegraph, electric light or power lines, gas stations, garages, and restaurants if deemed necessary by the authority in connection with the project, or for the use of any project or part thereof, including the right-of-way adjoining the paved portion of the turnpike or of any additional facility or for any other purposes and to fix the terms, conditions, rents and rates of charges for such use; provided, that the authority shall construct any gasoline service facilities which it may determine are needed on the project, and provided, further, that, to afford users of the project a reasonable choice of motor fuels of different brands, each gasoline service station shall be separately offered for lease upon sealed bids and, after notice of the offer has been published once a week in three (3) consecutive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the state, and, in the event an acceptable bid shall be received in the judgment of the authority, each lease shall be awarded to the highest responsible bidder therefor, but no person shall be awarded or have the use of, nor shall motor fuel identified by the trade-marks, trade names, or brands of any one supplier, distributor, or retailer of such fuel be sold at more than one service station if they would constitute more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the service stations on the project. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, members of the town of Jamestown police and fire department and ambulance service personnel of the town of Jamestown and Jamestown school department who, in the course of their duty, are required to pay a toll for use of the Newport Bridge, shall, upon the presentment of receipts for the payment of the toll to the town of Jamestown, be reimbursed for all charges on an annual basis by the town of Jamestown who in turn shall be reimbursed for all payments made by the state. The town of Jamestown shall submit a request for reimbursement to the division of municipal finance for the previous fiscal year (ending June 30th) no later than September 30th of the fiscal year following the fiscal year for which reimbursement is being requested. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, members of the city of Newport police and fire department and rescue personnel who, in the course of their duty, are required to pay a toll for use of the Newport Bridge, shall, upon the presentment of receipts for the payment of the toll to the city of Newport, be reimbursed for all charges on an annual basis by the city of Newport who in turn shall be reimbursed for all payments made by the state. The city of Newport shall submit a request for reimbursement to the division of municipal finance for the previous fiscal year (ending June 30th) no later than September 30th of the fiscal year following the fiscal year for which reimbursement is being requested.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, members of the police and fire department and rescue personnel of any city or town in this state who, in the course of their duty, are required to pay a toll for use of the Mount Hope Bridge or the Sakonnet River Bridge, if any, shall, upon the presentment of receipts for the payment of the toll to their town or city, be reimbursed for all such charges on an annual basis by the town or city, who in turn shall be reimbursed for all payments made by the state. Any city or town shall submit a request for reimbursement to the division of municipal finance for the previous fiscal year (ending June 30th) no later than September 30th of the fiscal year following the fiscal year for which reimbursement is being requested.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 9; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-26 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 16; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 14; P.L. 1985, ch. 200, § 1; P.L. 1985, ch. 312, § 1; P.L. 1988, ch. 500, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 332, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 413, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3; P.L. 2014, ch. 145, art. 21, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 141, art. 8, § 1.

24-12-27. Amount of tolls.

Tolls shall be so fixed and adjusted in respect of the aggregate of tolls from the project or projects or the portion or portions thereof in connection with which bonds shall have been issued under the provisions of this chapter as to provide a fund sufficient with other revenues, if any, to pay (1) the cost of maintaining, repairing, and operating the project or projects or portion or portions thereof and (2) the principal of and the interest on the bonds as the principal and interest shall become due and payable, and to create reserves for such purposes; provided, however, that the authority shall establish commutation rates for traffic over the Mount Hope Bridge by all vehicles, which rates shall not be in excess of the commutation rates in effect for vehicles on January 1, 1960. Tolls shall not be subject to supervision or regulation by any commission, board, bureau or agency of the state or of any municipality or other political subdivision of the state.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 9; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-27 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 17; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 15.

24-12-28. Revenues pledged to sinking fund.

To the extent provided in the resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds or finance lease or in the trust agreement securing the same, the tolls and all other revenues received by the authority, shall be set aside at such regular intervals as may be provided in the resolution or the trust agreement in a sinking fund or funds which shall be pledged to, and charged with, the payment of the lease payments and/or of the principal of and the interest on the bonds as the bonds shall become due, and the redemption price or the purchase price of bonds or other obligations retired by call or purchase as provided in the resolution or trust agreement. The pledge shall be valid and binding from the time when the pledge is made; the tolls and other revenues or other money so pledged and thereafter received by the authority shall immediately be subject to the lien of the pledge without any physical delivery thereof or further act, and the lien of any pledge shall be valid and binding as against all parties having claims of any kind in tort, contract, or otherwise against the authority, irrespective of whether the parties have notice thereof. Neither the resolution nor any trust agreement by which a pledge is created need be filed or recorded except in the records of the authority. The use and disposition of money to the credit of each sinking fund shall be subject to the provisions of the resolution authorizing the issuance of the lease, the bonds or of the trust agreement. Notwithstanding any provision(s) of Section 3 of Article 6 of Chapter 23 of the Public Laws of 2010, the provisions of this section shall apply to all bonds issued or to be issued by the authority.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 9; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-28 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 18; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

24-12-29. Trust funds — Trustee.

All money received pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, whether as proceeds from the sale of bonds or as revenues, shall be deemed to be trust funds to be held and applied solely as provided in this chapter. The authority shall, in the resolution authorizing the bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, provide for the payment of the proceeds of the sale of the bonds and the revenues to be received to a trustee, which shall be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state, who shall act as trustee of the funds, and hold and apply the bonds to the purposes of this chapter, subject to the regulations as this chapter and the resolution or trust agreement may provide.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 10; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-29 .

24-12-30. Remedies of bondholders.

Any holder of bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter or any of the coupons appertaining thereto, and the trustee under the trust agreement, except to the extent the rights herein given may be restricted by the trust agreement, may, either at law or in equity, by civil action, mandamus or other proceeding, protect and enforce any and all rights under the laws of the state or granted under this chapter or under the trust agreement or the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds, and may enforce and compel the performance of all duties required by this chapter or by the trust agreement or resolution to be performed by the authority or by any officer thereof, including the fixing, charging, and collecting of tolls.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 11; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-30 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

24-12-31. Tax exemption.

The exercise of the powers granted by this chapter will be in all respects for the benefit of the people of the state, for the increase of their commerce and prosperity and for the improvement of their health and living conditions, and as the acquisition, construction, operation, and maintenance by the authority of the projects as defined in this chapter as will constitute the performance of essential governmental functions, the authority shall not be required to pay any taxes or assessments upon the projects or upon any property acquired or used by the authority under the provisions of this chapter or upon the income from the projects, and the bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter, their transfer and the income therefrom (including any profit made on the sale thereof) shall at all times be free from taxation within the state.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 12; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-31 ; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Relationship With Other Laws.

Because building and maintaining roads was a core governmental function and the Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority (RITBA) failed to identify a narrowly-defined market in which it was a major participant, the market participant doctrine did not shield RITBA’s implementation of a toll schedule from scrutiny under the dormant Commerce Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3. Cohen v. R.I. Tpk. & Bridge Auth., 775 F. Supp. 2d 439, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40248 (D.R.I. 2011).

24-12-32. Eligibility of bonds for investment.

Bonds issued by the authority under the provisions of this chapter are hereby made securities in which all public officers and public bodies of the state and its political subdivisions, all insurance companies, trust companies, banking associations, investment companies, executors, administrators, trustees, and other fiduciaries may properly and legally invest funds, including capital in their control or belonging to them. The bonds are hereby made securities which may properly and legally be deposited with and received by any state or municipal officer or any agency or political subdivision of the state for any purpose for which the deposit of bonds or obligations is now or may hereafter be authorized by law.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 13; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-32 .

24-12-33. Negotiability of bonds.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter or any recitals in any bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter, all bonds shall be deemed to be negotiable instruments under the laws of this state.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 14; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-33 .

24-12-34. Refunding bonds.

The authority is hereby authorized to provide for the issuance of revenue refunding bonds of the authority for the purpose of refunding any bonds then outstanding which shall have been issued under the provisions of this chapter, including the payment of any redemption premium thereon or any interest accrued or to accrue to the date of redemption of the bonds, the cost of issuing the refunding bonds and, if deemed advisable by the authority, for the additional purpose of constructing improvements, extensions or enlargements of the project in connection with which the bonds to be refunded shall have been issued. The authority is further authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance of its revenue bonds for the combined purpose of (1) refunding any bonds then outstanding which shall have been issued under the provisions of this chapter, including the payment of any redemption premium thereon and any interest accrued on or to accrue to the date of redemption of the bonds, and (2) paying all or any part of the cost of any additional project, and, if deemed advisable by the authority, the cost of any improvements, extensions, or enlargements. Pending the application of the proceeds of the revenue refunding bonds, with any other available funds, to the payment of the principal, accrued interest and premium of the bonds being refunded and, if so provided or permitted in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the revenue refunding bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, to the payment of any interest on the refunding bonds, the authority may invest the proceeds in direct obligations of, or obligations the principal of and the interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America which shall mature, or which shall be subject to redemption by the holder thereof at the option of the holder, not later than the respective dates when the proceeds, together with the interest accruing thereon, will be required for the purposes intended or, in lieu of the investments, the authority may place all or part of the proceeds in interest bearing time deposits or make other similar arrangements with regard thereto which will assure that the proceeds, together with the interest accruing thereon, will be available when required for the purposes intended. The issuance of the bonds, the maturities and other details thereof, the rights of the holders thereof, and the rights, duties, and obligations of the authority in respect of the bonds shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter insofar as this chapter may be applicable.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 15; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-34 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 19; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 16; P.L. 1997, ch. 30, art. 36, § 1.

24-12-35. Resolutions of authority.

Any action taken by the authority under the provisions of this chapter may be authorized by resolution at any regular or special meeting, and each resolution shall take effect immediately and need not be published or posted.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 16; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-35 .

24-12-36. Annual report and audit.

Within the first ninety (90) days of each fiscal year of the authority, the authority shall make an annual report to the governor of its activities for the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall set forth a complete operating and financial statement covering its operations during the year. The state director of administration shall cause an annual audit of the books, records, and accounts of the authority to be made and the costs thereof shall be treated as a part of the cost of operation.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 16; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-36 .

24-12-37. Penalty for nonpayment of toll — Toll violators and toll evaders.

  1. Legislative findings.  The general assembly finds as follows:
    1. That all users of any tolled projects should be required to timely pay for the use of such projects;
    2. That toll violators and toll evaders unfairly shift the financial burden of maintaining the tolled projects to other project users; and
    3. Rhode Island has a strong interest in ensuring that its transportation infrastructure is adequately funded in a fair and equitable manner.
  2. In each instance when a person fails or refuses to pay or prepay the required toll on a tolled project, and is issued a violation for the same, the toll violator shall pay the toll amount within fourteen (14) days of issuance of the violation.
  3. Any toll violator who fails to pay the toll amount due within the fourteen-day (14) period in subsection (b) shall immediately incur a forty-dollar ($40.00) administrative fee in addition to the unpaid toll amount.
  4. Any toll violator who fails to pay the administrative fee and unpaid toll as required by subsection (c) within forty-five (45) days of the issuance of the original violation, shall incur a thirty five-dollar ($35.00) administrative fee in addition to the forty dollar ($40.00) administrative fee and the unpaid toll amount. The toll amount and administrative fees shall be paid to the authority.
  5. Toll evaders shall be responsible for any tolls and administrative fees applicable to toll violators. Further, at the request of the authority, any toll evader shall also promptly receive a traffic violation summons that shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Rhode Island traffic tribunal, which may suspend the toll evader’s driver’s license for up to six (6) months for the violations and assess a fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500), or both. All tolls, administrative fees, and fines shall be payable to the authority.
  6. If any unpaid toll amounts, administrative fees, and fines are not paid within ninety (90) days of the issuance of the original violation, and the toll violator has incurred at least ten (10) instances in which such toll violator has failed to pay any required toll amounts, administrative fees, and fines, then the authority may report the person as a toll violator, or, if appropriate, as a toll evader, to the Rhode Island division of motor vehicles, who then shall not permit that person to renew his or her driver’s license and vehicle registration until any unpaid toll amounts, administrative fees, and fines are paid to the authority. Upon the authority’s receipt of such payment or a written repayment agreement between the person and the authority, the authority shall promptly issue a verbal, written, or electric confirmation showing the amounts paid and a certification that the person does not owe any amounts to the authority or has otherwise made satisfactory repayment arrangements with the authority. In any such case, the Rhode Island division of motor vehicles shall forthwith release any hold placed for this purpose on the person’s license renewal and vehicle registration renewal. If a person who made satisfactory repayment arrangements with the authority subsequently fails to honor and comply with such arrangements with the authority according to their terms, the authority may re-report the person to the Rhode Island division of motor vehicles which shall then prohibit that person from renewing their driver’s license and vehicle registration until the originally unpaid toll amounts, administrative fees, and fines are paid to the authority.
  7. “Toll violator” means, for the purposes of this section, any person who uses any project and fails to pay or prepay the required toll.
  8. “Toll evader” means, for the purposes of this section, any person who uses a project, fails or refuses to pay or prepay the required toll, and deliberately circumvents or proceeds around or through a gate or other barrier on a project; and/or any toll violator who fails or refuses to pay or prepay the required toll on a tolled project at least twenty (20) or more times, received at least three (3) written notices from the authority (or its agent) regarding the non-payment of tolls, and is not a party to, or in current compliance with, a written repayment plan with the authority.
  9. The authority may promulgate appropriate rules and regulations to ensure the proper administration of the provisions of this section. Any person aggrieved by the authority’s assessment of any administrative fees may request review of such assessment through the process established by the authority, which shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 35 of title 42.
  10. For the purposes of this section only, “person” means the registered owner, EZPass account holder, driver, rentee, or lessee of a motor vehicle.
  11. This section shall apply retroactively to all persons who are toll evaders as of the effective date of this act [October 1, 2016].
  12. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to reduce or otherwise eliminate any tolls, fines, or penalties a person owes to the authority based upon violations occurring prior to the effective date of this act [October 1, 2016].
  13. It is unlawful for any person or business, other than an authorized representative of the authority, or any other duly authorized and existing toll or transportation agency, to sell, lease, rent, or offer for sale, lease or rent, any tokens, tickets, passes, transponders, or other evidences of payment issued for passage on any project. Any person or business who or that is found in violation of this subsection shall be punished, for each offense, by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).
  14. If any provision of this section or its application to any person is deemed invalid, any such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this section that may lawfully be given effect without the invalid provision.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 16; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-37 ; P.L. 1999, ch. 371, § 1; P.L. 2007, ch. 307, § 1; P.L. 2007, ch. 414, § 1; P.L. 2010, ch. 193, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 383, § 1; P.L. 2011, ch. 405, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 415, § 33; P.L. 2016, ch. 381, § 1; P.L. 2016, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 111, § 1; P.L. 2019, ch. 148, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2016, ch. 381, § 1, and P.L. 2016, ch. 398, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

P.L. 2019, ch. 111, § 1, and P.L. 2019, ch. 148, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

Effective Dates.

P.L. 2016, ch. 381, § 2, provides that the amendment to this section by that act takes effect on October 1, 2016.

P.L. 2016, ch. 398, § 2, provides that the amendment to this section by that act takes effect on October 1, 2016.

24-12-37.1. [Repealed.]

History of Section. P.L. 2011, ch. 383, § 2; P.L. 2011, ch. 405, § 2; Repealed by P.L. 2016, ch. 382, § 1, effective July 9, 2016; P.L. 2016, ch. 396, § 1, effective July 9, 2016.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former § 24-12-37.1 concerned additional penalties and toll evaders.

24-12-37.2. Driver/registered owner liability.

  1. The registered owner of the motor vehicle shall be primarily responsible in all prosecutions brought pursuant to the provisions of §§ 24-12-37 and 24-12-37.1 .
  2. In all prosecutions of nonpayment of toll violations, there is a rebuttable presumption that the registered owner of the vehicle was the operator of the vehicle and may be liable for the violation. The registered owner of the vehicle may assume liability for the violation by paying the fine; or by defending the violation.

History of Section. P.L. 2011, ch. 383, § 2; P.L. 2011, ch. 405, § 2.

24-12-38. Covenant against competition.

The state covenants and agrees with the holders of any bonds or obligations of the authority that the state will not authorize or permit the construction, operation, and maintenance of any additional facility for the transportation of passenger vehicles by any person or body other than the authority within a distance of ten (10) miles in either direction from any project financed by the authority under the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 20.

24-12-39. Transfer of projects to state — Dissolution of authority.

When all bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter and the interest thereon shall have been paid or a sufficient amount for the payment of all the bonds and the interest thereon to the maturity thereof shall have been set aside in trust for the benefit of the bondholders, all projects financed under the provisions of this chapter may be transferred to the state in good condition and repair, and thereupon the authority shall be dissolved and all funds of the authority not required for the payment of bonds shall be paid to the general treasurer for the use of the state and all machinery, equipment and other property belonging to the authority shall be vested in the state and delivered to the department of transportation.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 17; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-39 ; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 21; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

24-12-40. Dissolution of Jamestown Bridge commission — Bridge to become toll free portion of state highway system — Covenants with bondholders.

  1. In case provision shall be made for the redemption of the outstanding bridge revenue refunding bonds of the Jamestown Bridge commission through the operation of the sinking fund for the bonds before the issuance of revenue bonds under the provisions of § 24-12-21 , or in case the outstanding bridge revenue refunding bonds are retired from the proceeds of revenue bonds issued under the provisions of § 24-12-21 , and in either event, the Jamestown Bridge commission shall thereupon be dissolved and all powers, control, and jurisdiction over and title to the Jamestown Bridge shall vest immediately in the state, which shall thereafter maintain, repair, and operate the bridge and the bridge shall thereafter constitute a toll free portion of the state highway system.
  2. In recognition of engineering studies which show that the charging and collecting of tolls for the use of the Jamestown Bridge or a failure of the state to maintain, repair, and operate the bridge would decrease traffic over the Newport Bridge and diminish the toll revenues to be received on account of the operation of the Newport Bridge, the state covenants and agrees with the holders of any bonds or obligations of the authority issued to pay the cost of the Newport Bridge, that during any period when the bonds or obligations shall be outstanding and unpaid, the laws of Rhode Island shall not be amended to authorize or permit the charging and collecting of tolls on the Jamestown Bridge and the state shall maintain, repair, and operate the Jamestown Bridge as a portion of the state highway system.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 17; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-40 ; P.L. 1959, ch. 176, § 2; P.L. 1960, ch. 219, §§ 1, 22; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 17.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Tolls.

The Jamestown bridge having outstanding obligations, it was a violation of R.I. Const., Amend. 31, § 1 (see now R.I. Const., art. VI, § 16 ) for the state under the provisions of this section to take over the bridge and operate and maintain toll free. Opinion to Governor, 97 R.I. 200 , 196 A.2d 829, 1964 R.I. LEXIS 62 (1964).

It is ordinarily within the discretion of the general assembly to operate and maintain a bridge as a part of the state highway system, with or without the imposition of tolls, and the provisions of this section to the effect that so long as bonds for the payment of the Newport bridge should be outstanding and unpaid, the laws would not be amended so as to permit the collection of tolls on the Jamestown bridge, illegally interferes with the legislative powers of a subsequent general assembly, in violation of R.I. Const., art. IV, §§ 2 and 10. Opinion to Governor, 97 R.I. 200 , 196 A.2d 829, 1964 R.I. LEXIS 62 (1964).

24-12-40A. Title to Mount Hope Bridge vested in Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority — Continuation of tolls.

All powers, control, and jurisdiction of and title to the Mount Hope Bridge is hereby affirmed as having vested in the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority as of June 1, 1964, and the transfer of funds to the authority by the trustee under the trust indenture securing the Mount Hope Bridge revenue bonds is hereby ratified and affirmed. The authority shall continue to charge and collect tolls for the use of the Mount Hope Bridge to provide funds sufficient with any other monies available therefor for paying the costs of maintaining, repairing, and operating the bridge, and in any event tolls for the use of the Mount Hope Bridge shall continue until a fund shall be provided for the payment of engineering, financing, and legal services in connection with the financing and construction of the Newport Bridge. The power and right of the authority to collect and to use tolls collected for the use of the Mount Hope Bridge subsequent to June 1, 1964 for the purpose of payment of engineering, financial, and legal services in connection with the financing and construction of the Newport Bridge in an amount heretofore expended not in excess of six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) is hereby ratified and affirmed.

History of Section. P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 19; P.L. 1965, § 19; P.L. 1965, ch. 43, § 1.

24-12-40B. Certain bonds guaranteed by state.

  1. The authority is hereby authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance at one time or from time to time of bonds of the authority in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding seventeen million five hundred thousand dollars ($17,500,000) for paying a part of the cost of the Newport Bridge; the bonds shall be designated “Newport Bridge bonds — Guaranteed by the state,” and shall mature in such annual instalments, the first of which shall be made payable not earlier than five (5) years after the date of the bonds and the last of which shall be made payable not later than fifty (50) years after the date of the bonds, as may be determined by the authority with the approval of the general treasurer. The bonds shall be dated, shall bear interest at such rate or rates not exceeding six percent (6%) per annum and shall be made redeemable before maturity, at the option of the authority, at the price or prices and under such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the authority prior to the issuance of the bonds. The principal of and the interest on the bonds shall be payable at the office of the general treasurer, or at the option of the holder, at any bank or trust company within or without the state. The bonds shall be sold by the authority at public sale upon a call for sealed bids to be received at the office of the general treasurer in the city of Providence; the authority shall cause a notice of the sale to be published at least once at least fourteen (14) days before the date fixed for the receipt of bids in a daily newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Providence and in a daily newspaper of a general circulation or a financial journal published in New York City and devoted primarily to the subject of state, county, and municipal bonds; but no sale shall be made at less than par and accrued interest. The proceeds of the bonds shall be deposited to the credit of a special construction fund and applied by the authority to the payment of the cost of the Newport Bridge. The authority is further authorized, subject to the approval of the general treasurer, to provide by resolution for the issuance of bonds of the authority for the purpose of refunding any bonds then outstanding which shall have been issued under the provisions of this paragraph. The issuance of the bonds and the maturities and other details thereof shall be governed by the foregoing provisions of this subsection insofar as this chapter may be applicable. The state hereby guarantees the payment of the principal of and interest on all bonds issued under the provisions of this subsection as the bonds respectively become due and payable and the full faith and credit of the state are hereby pledged for the payment, and a statement to that effect shall be endorsed on the bonds by the general treasurer.
  2. The revenue bonds issued under the provisions of this chapter for paying the balance of the cost of the Newport Bridge, which revenue bonds, together with the bonds issued under the provisions of subsection (a) and other revenue bonds, if any, issued under the provisions of § 24-12-21 shall not exceed an aggregate principal amount of forty-seven million five hundred thousand dollars ($47,500,000) and shall mature at such time or times, not exceeding fifty (50) years from their date, as may be determined by the authority. Prior to the issuance of the bonds authorized to be issued under the provisions of the first subsection of this section, or the revenue bonds, if any, issued under the provisions of § 24-12-21 , or the revenue bonds issued for paying the balance of the cost of the Newport Bridge, the authority shall determine the respective amounts which are to be deposited in each fiscal year to the credit of a special fund for the payment of the interest on and the principal of the bonds and to create a reserve for such purpose, and also to provide a fund for accelerating the maturity or maturities of the bonds (the amounts being hereinafter collectively called the “Principal and interest requirements for the bonds”).
  3. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the authority is hereby authorized and directed to combine the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge for financing purposes and to fix, revise, charge and collect tolls for the use of the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge, which tolls and all other revenues derived from the Mount Hope Bridge and the Newport Bridge, except such part thereof as may be necessary to pay the cost of maintenance, repair, and operation and to provide the reserves therefor as may be provided for in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, shall be set aside at such regular intervals as may be provided in the resolution or the trust agreement and deposited to the credit of the following funds in the following order, until the bonds shall have been paid or adequate provisions shall have been made for their payment:
    1. To the credit of a special fund for paying the interest on and the principal of the revenue bonds issued under the provisions of subsection (a) of § 24-12-18 and the revenue bonds, if any, issued under the provisions of § 24-12-21 , such amount as may be required to make the amount deposited in the then current fiscal year to the credit of the fund equal to the principal and interest requirements of such bonds in such fiscal year;
    2. To the credit of a special fund for the payment of the interest on and the principal of the bonds issued under the provisions of subsection (a), the amount as may be required to make the amount deposited in the then current fiscal year to the credit of the fund equal to the total amount of the principal of and the interest on the bonds which is payable in the fiscal year; and
    3. To the credit of the special fund referred to in subsection (c)(1), the balance, if any, of the revenues; provided, however, that if the amount so deposited to the credit of the special fund referred to in subsection (c)(1) or to the credit of the special fund referred to in subsection (c)(2), in any fiscal year shall be less than the required amount, the requirement therefor shall nevertheless be cumulative and the amount of any deficiency in any fiscal year shall be added to the amount otherwise required to be deposited in each fiscal year thereafter until such time as all deficiencies shall have been made up.

History of Section. P.L. 1965, ch. 43, § 3; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

NOTES TO DECISIONS

Authorization of Bond Issuance.
— Additional Bonds.

Approval by voters of bond issue under former section did not authorize the issuance of many additional millions of revenue bonds under other sections of the law which would have been necessary for construction of the bridge where question on ballot referred only to the $17,500,000 authorized by this former section and made no mention of additional bonds although former § 24-12-40B itself did contain such a reference. Opinion to Governor, 99 R.I. 351 , 208 A.2d 105, 1965 R.I. LEXIS 445 (1965).

24-12-40C. Additional state guaranteed and revenue bonds for Newport Bridge.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the authority is hereby authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance at one time or from time to time for completion of the Newport Bridge seven million dollars ($7,000,000) aggregate principal amount of bonds of the authority consisting of (1) state guaranteed bonds of the authority in the aggregate principal amount of not exceeding three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) and designated “Newport Bridge bonds — Guaranteed by the state,” and (2) with the approval of the governor, revenue bonds of the authority in the aggregate principal amount of not exceeding three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) and designated “Newport Bridge revenue bonds.” The state guaranteed bonds and revenue bonds shall be in addition to the bonds of the authority authorized pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this chapter, and the issuance thereof and the maturities and other details thereof (including the approval of the maturities of the state guaranteed bonds by the general treasurer) shall be governed by the provisions of § 24-12-40B insofar as § 24-12-40B may be applicable and consistent with the provisions of this section. The state guaranteed bonds and revenue bonds shall be treated, respectively, as state guaranteed bonds and revenue bonds issued pursuant to § 24-12-40B for the purposes of deposits to the credit of and payments from the special funds established pursuant thereto; provided, however that the proceeds of the additional state guaranteed bonds shall be deposited to the credit of a special bond reserve fund to be held by the general treasurer and applied (together with any investment income therefrom), first, to the reimbursement of the state for all payments theretofore made by the state for interest due on outstanding “Newport Bridge bonds — Guaranteed by the state” of the authority pursuant to the guaranty of the state endorsed on the bonds, and second, to the payment, pursuant to the guaranty, of interest becoming due on “Newport Bridge bonds — Guaranteed by the state” of the authority, including the additional state guaranteed bonds issued under the provisions of this section. The authority is further authorized, subject to the approval of the general treasurer, to provide by resolution for the issuance of bonds of the authority for the purpose of refunding any of the additional state guaranteed bonds. The state hereby guarantees the payment of the principal of and the interest on all the additional state guaranteed bonds, including any bonds issued to refund the bonds, issued under the provisions of this section as the bonds respectively become due and payable, and the full faith and credit of the state is hereby pledged for the payment, and a statement to that effect shall be endorsed on the bonds by the general treasurer.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 228, § 1.

24-12-40D. Additional state guaranteed bonds for Newport Bridge.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter, the authority is hereby authorized to provide by resolution for the issuance at one time or from time to time for completion of the Newport Bridge ten million dollars ($10,000,000) aggregate principal amount of bonds of the authority designated “Newport Bridge bonds — Guaranteed by the state.” The state guaranteed bonds shall be in addition to the bonds of the authority authorized pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this chapter, (except that the three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) revenue bonds payable solely from toll revenues of the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge authorized by § 24-12-40C but unissued by the authority to pay for a part of the cost of completion of the Newport Bridge shall not be issued) and the issuance thereof and the maturities and other details thereof (including the approval of the maturities of the state guaranteed bonds by the general treasurer) shall be governed by the provisions of § 24-12-40B insofar as § 24-12-40B may be applicable and consistent with the provisions of this section. The state guaranteed bonds shall be treated as state guaranteed bonds issued pursuant to § 24-12-40B for the purposes of deposits to the credit of and payments from the special funds established pursuant thereto; provided, however, that a portion of the proceeds of the additional state guaranteed bonds may be deposited to the credit of a special bond reserve fund to be held by the general treasurer and applied (together with any interest income therefrom) to the payment of interest becoming due on the additional state guaranteed bonds issued under the provisions of this section. The authority is further authorized subject to the approval of the general treasurer to provide by resolution for the issuance of bonds of the authority for the purpose of refunding any of the additional state guaranteed bonds. The state hereby guarantees the payment of the principal of and the interest on all the additional state guaranteed bonds, including any bonds issued to refund the bonds, issued under the provisions of this section as the bonds respectively become due and payable, and the full faith and credit of the state is hereby pledged for the payment, and a statement to that effect shall be endorsed on the bonds by the general treasurer.

History of Section. P.L. 1967, ch. 183, § 1.

24-12-40E. State guaranteed bonds — General provision.

All payments made by the authority to the general fund for amounts loaned to the authority for payments on bond interest paid on state guaranteed bonds, shall, if requested in writing by the director of administration, be deposited by the state controller to a restricted receipt account. The moneys and interest or income earned from their investment shall be used for the payment of debt service cost (principal and interest) for state general obligation bonds.

History of Section. P.L. 1983, ch. 167, art. XIV, § 1.

24-12-40F. Title to Sakonnet River Bridge vested in Rhode Island turnpike and Bridge authority — Institution of tolls.

All powers, control, and jurisdiction of and title to the Sakonnet River Bridge is authorized to be transferred to the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority. Beginning August 19, 2013, and concluding on June 30, 2014, the authority may charge and collect tolls for the use of the Sakonnet River Bridge to provide funds sufficient with any other monies available therefor for paying the costs of acquiring, leasing, maintaining, repairing, and operating the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, the Mount Hope Bridge, the Newport Bridge, the Sakonnet River Bridge, the turnpike, and additional facilities. Provided, however, until June 30, 2014, the toll imposed on the Sakonnet River Bridge shall not exceed ten cents ($0.10).

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 4; P.L. 2013, ch. 143, § 2; P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 5, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 15, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 16, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 145, art. 21, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

In 2014, the compiler updated this section to incorporate the 2013 amendments by P.L. 2013, ch. 143, § 2 which were inadvertently left out of the original 2013 pocket part supplement.

This section was amended by three acts (P.L. 2014, ch. 15, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 16, § 1; P.L. 2014, ch. 145, art. 21, § 1) as passed by the 2014 General Assembly. Since the changes are in conflict with each other, the director of law revision of the joint committee on legislative services has determined that the changes made by P.L. 2014, ch. 145, art. 21, § 1, as the later enactment, supersede the changes made by P.L. 2014, ch. 15, § 1 and P.L. 2014, ch. 16, § 1.

P.L. 2014, ch. 15, § 1, and P.L. 2014, ch. 16, § 1 enacted identical amendments to this section.

24-12-40G. Title to Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge vested in Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority.

All powers, control, and jurisdiction of and title to the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge is authorized to be transferred to the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 4.

24-12-41. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are severable, and if any of its provisions shall be held unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of that court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 19; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-41 .

24-12-42. Narragansett Bay Bridge authority obligations.

All obligations of the Narragansett Bay Bridge authority created by chapter 2152 of the public laws of 1948 to repay any advances made to it by the Jamestown Bridge commission before January 1, 1954 shall be relinquished.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3390, § 20; G.L. 1956, § 24-12-42 .

24-12-43. Repealed.

History of Section. G.L., § 24-12-43 , as enacted by P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 25; Repealed by P.L. 1965, ch. 43, § 4.

24-12-44. Construction of connecting highways.

As the construction of a highway from a point at or near the Kingston interchange on state route 3 (the same being interstate route 95) to a point at or near the Jamestown Bridge is necessary to effectuate the powers granted by this chapter, the general assembly shall appropriate the sum or sums as it may deem necessary to provide for the construction of the highway before the opening for traffic of the Newport Bridge.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 25.

24-12-44A, 24-12-44B. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 21; Repealed by P.L. 1965, ch. 43, § 4.

24-12-45. Liberal construction.

This chapter, being necessary for the welfare of the state and its inhabitants, shall be liberally construed to effect the purposes thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 28.

24-12-46. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are severable and if any of its provisions shall be held unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of the court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions of this chapter. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that this chapter would have been adopted had the unconstitutional provisions not been included therein.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 29.

24-12-47. Inconsistent laws inapplicable.

All other general or special laws inconsistent with any provision of this chapter are hereby declared to be inapplicable to the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 30.

24-12-48. Provision for severance benefits.

In the event revenue bonds shall be issued in an amount estimated to be sufficient with any other available funds to pay the cost of constructing the Newport Bridge and opening the bridge for traffic, the authority shall cause a sufficient amount of the proceeds of the bonds as may be required to make the severance benefit payments hereinafter set forth, which amount shall in no event exceed the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), and which amount is hereby declared to be a part of the cost of the project or projects to be applied as follows:

  1. The sufficient amount of the proceeds shall be deposited in a bank in the state in the name of the Jamestown and Newport ferry company thereby creating a “severance benefit” account to be used by the Jamestown and Newport ferry company as a checking account for the purpose of paying upon the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic the severance benefits hereinafter set forth; namely,
    1. To employees of the department of transportation employed in the operation of the ferry from Jamestown to Newport at the time of the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic.
    2. To employees of the department of transportation employed in the operation of the ferry from Jamestown to Newport, whose employment is terminated involuntarily including termination occasioned by accident or illness between the time of the initial issuance of revenue bonds under the provisions of this chapter and the time of the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic, who have been regularly employed by the department of transportation and its predecessors in the operation of such ferry, including the Jamestown and Newport ferry company and the Jamestown ferry authority for twenty-four (24) months or longer, and who are separated from such employment, severance benefits as follows:
      1. For service of twenty-four (24) months — five (5) weeks additional pay at their respective rates of pay in effect at the time of the termination of their employment for regular work week exclusive of overtime.
      2. For service beyond twenty-four (24) months — five (5) weeks pay plus thirty (30) days pay for each additional year or major fraction thereof beyond twenty-four (24) months at their respective rates of pay in effect at the time of the termination of their employment for a regular work week exclusive of overtime.
      3. One day’s pay at their respective rates of pay for regular work day exclusive of overtime in effect at the time of the termination of their employment for each day of authorized accumulated sick leave remaining to their credit on the date of termination of their employment.
  2. In event the severance benefits computed as provided in subdivision (1) shall in the aggregate exceed the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), the amount of the benefit payable to each of the persons specified above shall be proportionately reduced and the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) shall be prorated among such persons.
  3. All sums remaining in the checking account after completion of the payments herein provided shall be paid to the Rhode Island turnpike authority.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 210, § 1; P.L. 1963, ch. 165, § 22; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 154.

24-12-49. Declaration of policy — Preventing economic harm to the town of Jamestown.

It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state to prevent the economic harm to the town of Jamestown which will occur upon the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic through loss of employment opportunities on the Jamestown and Newport ferries and the resultant dislocation of the residence of the Jamestown and Newport ferries employees, therefore:

  1. The authority shall, in the operation and maintenance of the Newport Bridge, engage employees of the department of transportation who were employed in connection with the operation of the ferries from Jamestown to Newport and whose employment is terminated voluntarily or involuntarily by reason of the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic, before it shall engage any other employees.
  2. The several departments of the state government including the personnel department are hereby charged with the responsibility of providing employment opportunities within the state classified service and within reasonable commuting distance of their residences, for employees of the department of transportation who were employed in connection with the operation of ferries from Jamestown to Newport and whose employment has been terminated by reason of the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic.
  3. During the period of the operation of the Newport Bridge as contemplated in this chapter, preference shall continue to be given to employees of the department of transportation employed in connection with the operation of the ferry from Jamestown to Newport and whose employment has been terminated by reason of the opening of the Newport Bridge to traffic in filling vacancies which may occur from time to time.

History of Section. P.L. 1962, ch. 210, § 1.

24-12-50. Relationship to department of transportation.

  1. The department of transportation is hereby constituted as the agency for the authority in carrying out all of the powers to construct, acquire, operate, and maintain turnpikes and bridges as conferred by the general laws upon the authority.
  2. Nothing in chapter 13 of title 42 or in this amendment to chapter 12 of title 24 shall limit the discretions, powers, and authorities of the Rhode Island turnpike and bridge authority necessary or desirable for it to execute and carry out the covenants, agreements, duties, and liabilities assumed by it in the trust agreement by and between the authority and the then serving trustee under indenture dated as of April 1, 2010, as supplemented from time to time, nor shall these chapters be construed in any way to affect the rights, privileges, powers, and remedies of any trustee and its successors, or of the holders of the bonds issued under the indenture, or under any resolutions of the authority.

History of Section. P.L. 1970, ch. 111, § 3; P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 3.

Cross References.

Liberal construction, § 42-13-4 .

Severability, § 42-13-5 .

24-12-51. The Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge.

Any bridge constructed in replacement of the Jamestown Bridge, as defined in § 24-12-1(7) , shall be named and known as the “Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1987, ch. 397, § 2.

24-12-51.1. Former Jamestown Verrazano Bridge — Public fishing area.

  1. The directors of the department of transportation and department of environmental management are hereby authorized and directed to retain the state-owned land adjacent to the former Jamestown Bridge on the North Kingstown side of the former bridge for use as a public parking area and public shore access site. The land so retained shall be open to the general public at no charge, and shall be made accessible to persons with disabilities, and shall provide the public with free and unfettered access to the shore and/or to any structure built over the water, in accordance with subsection (b) below.
  2. The directors of the department of transportation and department of environmental management are hereby authorized and directed to give due consideration to further development of the public shore access site provided for in this section, particularly with regard to recreational fishing opportunities. Such consideration shall include, but not be limited to, the potential establishment of a public fishing pier, boat access, and/or park. In pursuing further development of the site, the directors shall seek to maximize public use and enjoyment of the site, particularly with regard to fishing access. Any structures or facilities so developed shall be open to the general public at no charge and shall be made accessible to persons with disabilities.
  3. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in any general or public law, rule or regulation, the state of Rhode Island shall be responsible for maintenance and security of the site described in this section.
  4. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, the directors of the department of transportation and the department of environmental management are hereby authorized to limit public access to the site described in this section, between sunset and sunrise.

History of Section. P.L. 1987, ch. 348, § 1; P.L. 1999, ch. 83, § 58; P.L. 1999, ch. 130, § 58; P.L. 2008, ch. 143, § 1; P.L. 2008, ch. 196, § 1.

24-12-52. Succotash Road Bridge.

The Succotash Road Bridge in the town of South Kingstown shall be named and known as the “Norman Lavallee Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1989, ch. 460, § 1.

24-12-53. William E. Powers Memorial Bridge.

The bridge on Board Street (route 114) in the town of Cumberland shall be named and known as the “William E. Powers Memorial Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1989, ch. 463, § 1.

24-12-54. Alfred U. Menard Memorial Bridge.

The route 99 Sayles Hill Road overpass in the town of Lincoln shall be named and known as the “Alfred U. Menard Memorial Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1991, ch. 22, § 1.

24-12-55. The Claiborne Pell Bridge.

The Newport Bridge shall hereafter be named and known as the “Claiborne Pell Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1992, ch. 458, § 1.

24-12-56. Honorable John F. Conley Bridge.

The Greenwood Avenue bridge in the city of East Providence shall hereafter be known as the “Honorable John F. Conley Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1993, ch. 15, § 1.

24-12-57. General George S. Greene Memorial Bridge.

The bridge known as Bridge No. 5 on Post Road in the Apponaug section of the city of Warwick shall hereafter be known as the “General George S. Greene Memorial Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 1995, ch. 69, § 1.

24-12-58. Robert E. Rowan, P.E. Bridge.

The Crawford Street Bridge shall hereafter be named and known as the “Robert E. Rowan, P.E. Bridge”.

History of Section. P.L. 2000, ch. 464, § 1.

24-12-59. Bondholders’ rights not to be affected by the state.

The state does pledge to and agree with the holders of any bonds or notes issued under this chapter that the state will not limit or alter the rights vested in the authority to fulfill the terms of any agreements made with the holders until those bonds or notes, together with their interest, with interest on any unpaid installments of interest, and all costs and expenses in connection with any action or proceeding by or on behalf of those holders, are fully met and discharged. The authority is authorized to include this pledge and agreement of the state in any agreement with the holders of those bonds or notes.

History of Section. P.L. 2015, ch. 141, art. 2, § 3.

Chapter 13 Mount Hope Bridge Authority [Repealed.]

24-13-1 — 24-13-32. Repealed.

History of Section. P.L. 1954, ch. 3391, §§ 1-17 and 20; P.L. 1959, ch. 149, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 155; Repealed by P.L. 2006, ch. 13, § 1, effective March 29, 2006; P.L. 2006, ch. 25, § 1, effective April 20, 2006.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former §§ 24-13-1 — 24-13-32 concerned Mount Hope Bridge Authority.

Former § 24-13-31 (P.L. 1954, ch. 3391, § 18; P.L. 1955, ch. 3503, § 1; G.L. 1956, § 24-13-31), concerning termination of tolls and transfer of bridge to state, was previously repealed by P.L. 1960, ch. 219, § 26.

Chapter 14 Junkyard Control Act

24-14-1. Short title.

This act may be cited as the “Junkyard Control Act.”

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

Cross References.

Automobile wrecking and salvage yards, § 42-14.2-1 et seq.

Collateral References.

Validity, construction and application of zoning ordinance relating to operation of junkyard or scrap metal processing plant. 50 A.L.R.3d 827.

24-14-2. Declaration of policy.

For the purpose of promoting the public safety, health, welfare, convenience, and enjoyment of public travel, to protect the public investment in public highways, and to preserve and enhance the scenic beauty of lands bordering public highways, it is hereby declared to be in the public interest to regulate and restrict the establishment, operation, and maintenance of junkyards in areas adjacent to the interstate and primary highways systems within this state. The general assembly hereby finds and declares that junkyards which do not conform to the requirements of this chapter are public nuisances.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

Collateral References.

Automobile wrecking yard or place of business as nuisance. 84 A.L.R.2d 653.

Regulation of junk dealers. 45 A.L.R.2d 1391.

24-14-3. Definitions.

  1. “Automobile junkyard” means any establishment or place where one or more unserviceable, discarded, worn out or junked automobiles or bodies, engines, tires, parts or accessories are gathered together.
  2. “Interstate system” means that portion of the national system of interstate and defense highways located within this state, as officially designated, or as may hereafter be so designated, by the director of transportation, and approved by the secretary of commerce, pursuant to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, Highways.
  3. “Junk” means old or scrap copper, brass, rope, rags, batteries, paper, trash, rubber debris, waste, or junked, dismantled, or wrecked automobiles, or parts thereof, iron, steel, and other old or scrap ferrous or nonferrous material.
  4. “Junkyard” means an establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated, or used for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile junkyard and the term shall include garbage dumps and sanitary fills.
  5. “Primary system” means that portion of connected main highways, as officially designated, or as may hereafter be so designated, by the director of transportation, and approved by the secretary of commerce, pursuant to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, Highways.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-4. Junkyards prohibited.

No person, firm, corporation or association shall establish, operate or maintain a junkyard, any portion of which is within one thousand feet (1000´) of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any interstate or primary highway, except the following:

  1. Those which are screened by natural objects, plantings, fences, or other appropriate means so as not to be visible from the main traveled way of the system, or otherwise removed from sight.
  2. Those located within areas which are zoned for industrial use under authority of law.
  3. Those located within unzoned industrial areas, which areas shall be determined from actual land uses and defined by regulations to be promulgated by the director of transportation.
  4. Those which are not visible from the main traveled way of the system.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-5. Junkyards lawfully in existence.

Any junkyard lawfully in existence on May 6, 1966, or which is or may be lawfully established along any highway which is hereafter made a part of the interstate or primary systems and which has been so established before the inclusion of the highway within the interstate or primary systems and which is within one thousand feet (1000´) of the nearest edge of the right-of-way and visible from the main traveled way of any highway on the interstate or primary system, shall be screened, if feasible, by the director of transportation at locations on the highway right-of-way or in areas acquired for such purposes outside the right-of-way so as not to be visible from the main traveled way of the highways; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to relieve the owners or operators of automobile junkyards from the provisions of chapter 21 of title 5 relating to the screening thereof.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-6. Requirement as to screening.

The director of transportation shall have the authority to promulgate rules and regulations governing the location, planting, construction, and maintenance, including the materials used in screening or fencing required by this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-7. Authority to acquire interest in land for removal and screening of junkyards.

When the director of transportation determines that the topography of the land adjoining the highway will not permit adequate screening of the junkyards or the screening of the junkyards would not be economically feasible, the director of transportation shall have the authority to acquire by gift, purchase, or condemnation, such interests in lands as may be necessary to secure the relocation, removal, or disposal of the junkyards; and to pay for the costs of relocation, removal, or disposal, thereof. When the director of transportation determines that it is in the best interest of the state, the director may acquire such lands, or interests in lands, as may be necessary to provide adequate screening of the junkyards by gift, purchase or condemnation. The acquisition of lands or interests in lands under this section shall be made in accordance with the provisions of chapter 6 of title 37.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1; P.L. 1989, ch. 542, § 72; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 156.

24-14-8. Injunction.

The director of transportation may make application to the superior court in the county in which junkyards established or maintained in violation of this chapter may be located, for an injunction to abate the nuisances.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-9. Penalties.

  1. It shall be a misdemeanor to operate or maintain a junkyard in violation of this chapter except those junkyards lawfully in existence on May 6, 1966.
  2. It shall be the duty of the state police and the police of the cities and towns to enforce this chapter, and any persons, firm, corporation or association violating this section shall, upon conviction of the first offense, be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than one hundred dollars ($100), or by imprisonment for not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days, or both the fine and imprisonment, and shall for a second or subsequent conviction be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500), or by imprisonment for not less than thirty (30) days nor more than six (6) months, or by both the fine and imprisonment; provided, however, that any automobile junkyard violating this section and chapter 21 of title 5, shall be prosecuted in accordance with chapter 21 of title 5, and upon conviction be subject to the penalties provided in that chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-10. Interpretation.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to abrogate or affect the provisions of any lawful ordinance, regulation, or resolution, which is more restrictive than the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-11. Agreements with the United States authorized.

The director of transportation is hereby authorized to enter into agreements with the United States secretary of commerce as provided by title 23, United States Code, relating to the control of junkyards in areas adjacent to the interstate and primary systems, and to take action in the name of the state to comply with the terms of the agreement.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1.

24-14-12. Severability.

If any section, clause or provision of this chapter shall be held either unconstitutional or ineffective in whole or in part to the extent that it is not unconstitutional or ineffective, it shall be valid and effective and no other section, clause or provision shall on account of the invalidity be termed invalid or ineffective.

History of Section. P.L. 1966, ch. 118, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 156.

Chapter 15 Scenic Highways

24-15-1. Purpose.

In order to create and preserve rustic and scenic highways for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian travel in unhurried, quiet, and leisurely enjoyment; to protect and preserve recreational driving, culture, beauty, trees, vegetation, shoreline, and wildlife by establishing protective standards of scenic highway design, speed, maintenance, and identification, which will promote a continuous system of scenic highways and scenic easements for the public health and welfare; a state system of scenic highways is created.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1.

24-15-2. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Board” means the scenic roadways board.
  2. “Director” means the director of the department of transportation.
  3. “Municipality” means a city or town.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1995, ch. 233, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 157; P.L. 2005, ch. 228, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 315, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 415, § 34.

24-15-3. Designation as a scenic highway.

The director, or the governing body of any municipality as to any highway (including a state highway) within its borders, may apply to the board for the designation of a highway as a scenic highway. A municipality making application for a state highway shall notify the director of the Rhode Island department of transportation. The director shall have thirty (30) days to comment on the application. After holding a public hearing, the board shall approve or deny the application for designation of a highway as a scenic highway submitted under this section. Provided, however, that prior to any approval or denial of any application, the applicant shall notify the owners of the properties fronting the application area that an application has been filed and the board shall provide the fronting property owners with an opportunity to attend a public hearing in the municipality subject to the application, and in the Town of Westerly no application for designation of a highway or road, or portion of a highway or road, shall be approved unless the owners of a majority of the lineal lot frontage abutting the highway or road agree to the designation by filing with the director or governing municipal body, within sixty (60) days immediately following the application, a written statement or statements agreeing to the designation.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 354, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 369, § 1; P.L. 1998, ch. 55, § 1; P.L. 1998, ch. 363, § 1; P.L. 1999, ch. 422, § 1.

24-15-4. Withdrawal of highways from scenic highways system.

After holding a public hearing, the director, or the governing body of any municipality as to any scenic highway (including a state highway) within its borders, may apply to the board for, and the board itself may propose, the removal of a highway from the scenic highway system. The board shall thereupon approve or deny the removal of the highway from its designation as a scenic highway. Provided, however, that no application for removal of a highway or road, or portion thereof, from the scenic highways system, shall be approved unless the owners of a majority of the lineal lot frontage abutting the highway or road agree to the removal by filing an application with the director or governing municipal body, within the sixty (60) days immediately preceding the application, a written statement or statements agreeing to the removal.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 354, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 369, § 1.

24-15-5. Joint jurisdiction of highways.

Highways under the joint jurisdiction of two (2) or more municipalities may not be designated scenic highways or be withdrawn from the scenic highway system until after approval by the governing bodies of all affected municipalities and the board.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1.

24-15-6. Local authority.

The director and the municipalities and all other authorities shall have the same authority over scenic highways as they possess over other highways under their jurisdiction except as otherwise provided in this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 326, § 157.

24-15-7. Funding.

State aid for scenic highways shall be determined in accordance with the local transportation funding as provided in these general laws.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1.

24-15-8. Scenic highways marking signs — State payment.

The department of transportation shall pay the cost of furnishing and installing scenic highway marking signs on officially designated scenic highways.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1.

24-15-9. Rules and standards.

The board shall promulgate rules and establish standards for the maintenance, identification, construction, use, and preservation of the scenic highways system. The board may establish rules and standards for regulating and limiting the construction or establishment of a highway which is inconsistent with the purpose of this chapter. No rule or regulation may be adopted or promulgated which affects any provision of the general laws of the state or any federal statutory provision without the prior approval of the general assembly.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1991, ch. 187, § 3.

24-15-10. Creation of board.

There is hereby authorized, created and established within the executive department a scenic roadways board consisting of eleven (11) members as follows: one member shall be the director of the department of transportation or his or her designee who shall be a subordinate within the department of transportation; one member shall be the director of the department of environmental management or his or her designee who shall be a subordinate within the department of environmental management; one member shall be the chair of the historic preservation commission; one member shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate giving due consideration to the recommendation of Grow Smart Rhode Island; one member shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate giving due consideration to the recommendation of the Rhode Island builders association; six (6) members shall be appointed by the governor from the general public with the advice and consent of the senate, in making these appointments, the governor shall take into consideration the impact on the local communities. The governor shall give due consideration to members of local land trusts, chamber of commerce recommendations and shall also consider the need for individuals with expertise in landscape architecture, community planning, and/or transportation engineers with experience with traffic calming and flexible design policies. The members shall be chosen as far as is reasonably practicable to represent geographical diversity and communities where designated scenic roadways exist. During the month of January, in each year the governor shall appoint a member to succeed the departing member. The newly appointed member shall serve for a term of three (3) years or until their respective successors are appointed and qualified. The members of the board shall be eligible to succeed themselves. Any vacancy of a public member which may occur in the board shall be filled by appointment by the governor for the remainder of the unexpired term in the same manner as the member’s predecessor as prescribed in this section. The membership of the board shall receive no compensation for their services, and shall not be reimbursed for any expenses. Those members of the board as of the effective date of this act [July 9, 2005] who were appointed to the board by members of the general assembly shall cease to be members of the board on the effective date of this act, and the governor shall thereupon appoint the four (4) new members as prescribed in this section. Those members of the board as of the effective date of this act [July 9, 2005] who were appointed to the board by the governor shall continue to serve the balance of their current terms. Upon the expiration of the term of the member representing the Audubon Society of Rhode Island, the governor shall appoint a new member, and shall give due consideration to the recommendation of Grow Smart Rhode Island. Thereafter, the appointments shall be made by the governor as prescribed in this section. No one shall be eligible for appointment unless he or she is a resident of this state. The director of the department of transportation shall direct staff to support the board within the constraints of available resources.

History of Section. P.L. 1985, ch. 398, § 1; P.L. 1995, ch. 233, § 1; P.L. 2001, ch. 180, § 55; P.L. 2005, ch. 228, § 1; P.L. 2005, ch. 315, § 1.

24-15-10.1. Chair, quorum and removal for cause.

  1. Upon the passage of this act and the appointment and qualification of the four (4) new members prescribed in § 24-15-10 , the board shall meet at the call of the director of transportation and shall elect from among the members a chair and a vice-chair. Thereafter, the board shall annually elect in February a chair and a vice-chair from among the members. The board may elect from among its members such other officers as it deems necessary.
  2. Six (6) members of the board shall constitute a quorum, and a majority vote of those present and voting shall be required for action.
  3. Members of the board shall be removable by the governor pursuant to § 36-1-7 and for cause only, and removal solely for partisan or personal reasons unrelated to capacity or fitness for the office shall be unlawful.

History of Section. P.L. 2005, ch. 228, § 2; P.L. 2005, ch. 315, § 2.

24-15-10.2. Powers and duties.

In addition to the duties and powers conferred upon the board by this chapter, it has the following additional duties and powers:

  1. To conduct a training course for newly appointed and qualified members and new designees of ex-officio members within six (6) months of their qualification or designation. The course shall be developed by the chair of the board, approved by the board, and conducted by the chair of the board. The board may approve the use of any board or staff members or other individuals to assist with training. It shall include instruction in the following areas: the provisions of chapters 25-15, 42-46, 36-14 and 38-2; and the board’s rules and regulations. The director of the department of administration shall, within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this act, prepare and disseminate training materials relating to the provisions of chapters 42-46, 36-14 and 38-2.
  2. To approve and submit, an annual report within ninety (90) days after the end of each fiscal year to the governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, and the secretary of state of its activities during that fiscal year. The report shall provide: an operating statement summarizing meetings or hearings held, including meeting minutes, subjects addressed, decisions rendered, applications considered and their disposition, rules or regulations promulgated, studies conducted, policies and plans developed, approved, or modified, and programs administered or initiated; a consolidated financial statement of all funds received and expended including the source of the funds, a listing of any staff supported by these funds, and a summary of any clerical, administrative or technical support received; a summary of performance during the previous fiscal year including accomplishments, shortcomings and remedies; a synopsis of any legal matters related to the authority of the board; a summary of any training courses held pursuant to this section; a briefing on anticipated activities in the upcoming fiscal year; and findings and recommendations for improvements. The report shall be posted electronically as prescribed in § 42-20-8.2 . The director of the department of administration shall be responsible for the enforcement of this provision.

History of Section. P.L. 2005, ch. 228, § 2; P.L. 2005, ch. 315, § 2.

Chapter 16 Safe Access to Public Roads

24-16-1. Legislative findings.

It is hereby found and declared as follows:

  1. To achieve a cleaner, greener transportation system the transportation plans of Rhode Island should consider the needs of all users of our roadways including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation riders, motorists and citizens of all ages and abilities, including children, the elderly and the disabled. By encouraging good planning, more citizens will achieve the health benefits associated with active forms of transportation while traffic congestion and automobile related air pollution will be reduced. Therefore, it shall be the policy of the state to consider people of all ages and abilities and all appropriate forms of transportation when planning roadway projects.
  2. For all state and local transportation projects that are eligible for both federal and state funding and are subject to department of transportation oversight, Rhode Island must provide for the consideration of safe travel by all users of the road network, including motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation users, regardless of age or ability, through the use of complete street design features for safe travel in the planning, design, and construction of new or reconstructed facilities, but not including, resurfacing, or other maintenance — level projects.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 315, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 355, § 1.

Compiler’s Notes.

P.L. 2012, ch. 315, § 1, and P.L. 2012, ch. 355, § 1 enacted identical versions of this chapter.

24-16-2. Complete street design.

  1. When the state of Rhode Island constructs or modifies roads and highways, the relevant department must consider complete street design features that facilitate safe travel by all users that expands upon currently accepted state and federal design requirements to accommodate all users, including current and projected users, particularly pedestrians, bicyclists and individuals of all ages and mobility capabilities. These features of complete street design shall include, but not be limited to, sidewalks, paved shoulders suitable for use by bicyclists, lane striping, bicycle lanes, share the road signage, “road diets,” roundabouts, crosswalks, pedestrian control signalization, bus pull outs, curb cuts, raised crosswalks and ramps and traffic calming measures.
  2. Exceptions to subsection (a) of this section shall be permissible only after the agency with jurisdiction over the project, fully demonstrates with supporting documentation which shall be available to the public, that one of the following exists:
    1. Use by bicyclists and pedestrians is prohibited by law, such as within interstate highway corridors; or
    2. The cost would be disproportionate to the need as determined by factors including, but not limited to, the following: (i) Land use context; (ii) Current and projected traffic volumes including non-motorized traffic; and (iii) population density; or
    3. Demonstrated lack of need as determined by factors, including, but not limited to: (i) Land use; (ii) Current and projected traffic volumes including non-motorized traffic; and (iii) population density.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 315, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 355, § 1.

24-16-3. Reports.

  1. No later than two (2) years after the effective date of this chapter, the department of transportation shall publish a report showing how the department of transportation has complied with this section of highway law and changed their procedures to institutionalize complete streets design features into planning, project scoping, design and implementation of highway and road projects. The report shall include, but not be limited to, a discussion of the review of and revisions to various guidance documents regarding lane width, design speed, average daily traffic thresholds, level of service and roadway classification. The report shall also show any best practices that the transportation agency utilized in complying with § 24-16-2 of the highway law.
  2. In establishing such best practices, consideration shall be given to the procedures for identifying the needs of the mix of users, including primary and secondary users and the identification of barriers, and summary of the documentation required by subsection 24-16-2(b) of the highway law regarding why the transportation agency could not comply with subsection (a).

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 315, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 355, § 1.

24-16-4. Department of transportation consultation.

In the project development process the department of transportation shall consult with transportation, land-use and environmental officials, including representatives from:

  1. Cities and towns;
  2. Metropolitan planning organizations;
  3. Public transit operators;
  4. Relevant state agencies; and
  5. Other relevant stakeholders, including, but not limited to, representatives from disability rights groups, aging groups, bicycle and pedestrian advocates, and developers.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 315, § 1; P.L. 2012, ch. 355, § 1.

Chapter 17 East Bay Bridge System Act of 2012

24-17-1. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “East Bay Bridge System Act of 2012”.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 1.

24-17-2. Legislative findings.

The general assembly finds that:

  1. The State of Rhode Island, through the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (“RIDOT”), funds the repair, replacement, and maintenance of bridges in Rhode Island, except the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge.
  2. Rhode Island depends on three primary sources for funding all transportation infrastructure construction, maintenance, and operations. These sources are Federal funds, State bond funds, and motor fuel tax revenue. Of these sources, two (Federal funds and motor fuel tax revenue) are mutable.
  3. The 2008 Governor’s Blue Ribbon Panel on Transportation Funding and the 2011 Senate Special Commission on Sustainable Transportation funding determined that there is insufficient revenue available from all existing sources to fund the maintenance and improvement of Rhode Island transportation infrastructure.
  4. In 2011, the Rhode Island general assembly adopted a component of the recommended systemic change to transportation funding by creating the Rhode Island Highway Maintenance Trust Fund, to be funded by an increase in license and registration fees and contributions from the Rhode Island Capital Plan (RICAP) fund, beginning in FY2014.
  5. Although the State is shifting from long-term borrowing to annual revenues to fund transportation infrastructure, there is still a funding gap between the revenue needed to maintain all roads and bridges in good condition and the annual amounts generated by current revenue sources.
  6. The State has sufficient financial resources to complete the construction of the new Sakonnet River Bridge and to demolish the existing Sakonnet River Bridge, but does not have sufficient financial resources to assure the future maintenance and operation of the Sakonnet River Bridge.
  7. There is limited access to and from Rhode Island’s East Bay, consisting of Bristol and Newport Counties, and this access is restricted both by geography and infrastructure. The most critical infrastructure includes the four bridges that comprise the access to Aquidneck Island and Conanicut Island. These four bridges make up less than half a percent of the total bridges in the state, but comprise approximately twenty percent of the deck area of all Rhode Island bridges.
  8. Two of the four bridges, the Sakonnet River Bridge and the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge, are owned and maintained by RIDOT. The Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority (“RITBA”) currently owns and maintains the other two bridges: the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge.
  9. In the current economic and political climate, cooperation between State departments and/or quasi-public agencies provides the best opportunity to maximize financial and knowledge-based resources.
  10. RITBA currently assesses a toll for passage over the Newport Bridge, and this toll serves as the sole source of revenue for RITBA to maintain both the Newport Bridge and the Mount Hope Bridge and related appurtenances.
  11. The Federal Highway Administration allows for the placement of tolls on certain transportation infrastructure in order to assure the improvement and proper operation and maintenance of the structure and associated roadways.
  12. The current toll structure places undue burden on the residents, businesses, and visitors who must use the Newport Bridge to access work, schools, shopping, and other essential services. It is crucial to establish a comprehensive strategy to fund and maintain the bridges connecting the East Bay.
  13. The transfer of the Sakonnet River Bridge and its appurtenances and the Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge and its appurtenances to the Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority would be in the best interests of the State of Rhode Island and its residents, particularly those living and working in the East Bay.
  14. The placement of a toll on the Sakonnet River Bridge, under the direction of RITBA, would serve to create a more viable means of funding future maintenance and repairs of the East Bay bridges and would allow for the establishment of a more equitable toll structure, along with a fund for capital transportation projects and preventive maintenance in the East Bay.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 1.

24-17-3. East Bay Infrastructure fund established.

  1. There is hereby created a special account in the general fund to be known as the East Bay Infrastructure (EBI) fund.
  2. The fund shall consist of all those moneys which the Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority may and the state may, from time to time, direct to the fund, including, but not necessarily limited to, funds in excess of those required to (i) pay debt service payments, (ii) operate and maintain the bridges; and (iii) maintain required or adequate reserves.
  3. All funds collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the EBI fund and shall be used only in Bristol and Newport Counties, and only for the purposes set forth in this chapter.
  4. Unexpended balances and any earnings thereon shall not revert to the general fund but shall remain in the EBI fund. There shall be no requirement that moneys received into the EBI fund during any given calendar year or fiscal year be expended during the same calendar year or fiscal year.
  5. The EBI fund shall be administered by the director, who shall allocate and spend moneys from the fund only in accordance with the purposes and procedures set forth in this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 2012, ch. 241, art. 20, § 1.

Chapter 18 Municipal Road and Bridge Revolving Fund

24-18-1. Short title.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Municipal Road and Bridge Revolving Fund Act of 2013.”

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-2. Legislative findings.

The general assembly finds and declares that:

  1. Transportation plays a critical role in enabling economic activity in the state of Rhode Island;
  2. Cities and towns can lower the costs of borrowing for road and bridge projects through cooperation with the Rhode Island infrastructure bank;
  3. The Clean Water and Drinking Water Fund programs administered by the Rhode Island infrastructure bank benefit from the highest bond rating of any public entity in the state of Rhode Island; and
  4. Greater coordination among cities and towns will enable more efficient allocation of infrastructure resources by the state of Rhode Island.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 141, art. 14, § 2.

24-18-3. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms, unless the context requires a different interpretation, shall have the following meanings:

  1. “Agency” means the Rhode Island infrastructure bank as set forth in chapter 12.2 of title 46;
  2. “Annual construction plan” means the finalized list of approved projects to commence construction each calendar year;
  3. “Approved project” means any project approved by the agency for financial assistance;
  4. “Department” means the department of transportation, or, if the department shall be abolished, the board, body, or commission succeeding to the principal functions thereof or upon whom the powers given by chapter 5 of title 37 to the department shall be given by law;
  5. “Eligible project” means an infrastructure plan, or portion of an infrastructure plan, that meets the project evaluation criteria;
  6. “Financial assistance” means any form of financial assistance other than grants provided by the agency to a city or town in accordance with this chapter for all or any part of the cost of an approved project, including, without limitation, temporary and permanent loans, with or without interest, guarantees, insurance, subsidies for the payment of debt service on loans, lines of credit, and similar forms of financial assistance;
  7. “Infrastructure plan” means a project proposed by a city or town that would make capital improvements to roads, bridges, and appurtenances thereto consistent with project evaluation criteria;
  8. “Market rate” means the rate the city or town would receive in the open market at the time of the original loan agreement as determined by the agency in accordance with its rules and regulations;
  9. “Project evaluation criteria” means the criteria used by the department to evaluate infrastructure plans and rank eligible projects and shall include, but not be limited to:
    1. The extent to which the project generates economic benefits;
    2. The extent to which the project would be able to proceed at an earlier date;
    3. The likelihood that the project would provide mobility benefits;
    4. The cost effectiveness of the project;
    5. The likelihood that the project would increase safety; and
    6. The project’s readiness to proceed within the forthcoming calendar year.
  10. “Project priority list” means the list of eligible projects ranked in the order in which financial assistance shall be awarded by the agency pursuant to § 24-18-7 ;
  11. “Revolving fund” means the municipal road and bridge revolving fund established under § 24-18-4 ; and
  12. “Subsidy assistance” means credit enhancements and other measures to reduce the borrowing costs for a city or town.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2015, ch. 141, art. 14, § 2; P.L. 2017, ch. 480, § 1.

24-18-4. Establishment of the municipal road and bridge revolving fund.

  1. There is hereby established a municipal road and bridge revolving fund. The agency shall establish and set up on its books the revolving fund, to be held in trust and to be administered by the agency solely as provided in this chapter and in any trust agreement securing bonds of the agency. The agency shall deposit the following monies into the fund:
    1. Amounts appropriated or designated to the agency by the state for the purposes of this chapter;
    2. Loan repayments and other payments received by the agency pursuant to loan agreements with cities and towns executed in accordance with this chapter;
    3. Investment earnings on amounts credited to the fund;
    4. Proceeds of bonds of the agency to the extent required by any trust agreement for such bonds;
    5. Administrative fees levied by the agency;
    6. Other amounts required by provisions of this chapter or agreement, or any other law or any trust agreement pertaining to bonds to be credited to the revolving fund; and
    7. Any other funds permitted by law which the agency in its discretion shall determine to credit thereto.
  2. The agency shall establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures conforming to generally accepted government accounting standards sufficient to ensure proper accounting for receipts in and disbursements from the revolving fund.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-5. Administration.

  1. The agency shall have all the powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this chapter including, without limiting the generality of the preceding statement, the authority:
    1. To receive and disburse such funds from the state as may be available for the purpose of the revolving fund subject to the provisions of this chapter;
    2. To make and enter into binding commitments to provide financial assistance to local cities and towns from amounts on deposit in the revolving fund;
    3. To enter into binding commitments to provide subsidy assistance for loans and city and town obligations from amounts on deposit in the revolving fund;
    4. To levy administrative fees on cities and towns as necessary to effectuate the provisions of this chapter, provided the fees have been previously authorized by an agreement between the agency and the city or town;
    5. To engage the services of third-party vendors to provide professional services; and
    6. To establish one or more accounts within the revolving fund; and
    7. Such other authority as granted to the agency under chapter 12.2 of title 46.
  2. Subject to the provisions of this chapter, to the provisions of any agreement with the state authorized by § 24-18-6 , and to any agreements with the holders of any bonds of the agency or any trustee therefor, amounts held by the agency for the account of the revolving fund shall be applied by the agency, either by direct expenditure, disbursement, or transfer to one or more other funds and accounts held by the agency or maintained under any trust agreement pertaining to bonds, either alone or with other funds of the agency, to the following purposes:
    1. To provide financial assistance to cities and towns to finance costs of approved projects, and to refinance the costs of the projects, subject to such terms and conditions, if any, as are determined by the department and/or the agency in accordance with § 24-18-7 ;
    2. To fund reserves for bonds of the agency and to purchase insurance and pay the premiums therefor, and pay fees and expenses of letters or lines of credit and costs of reimbursement to the issuers thereof for any payments made thereon or on any insurance, and to otherwise provide security for, and a source of payment for obligations of the agency, by pledge, lien, assignment, or otherwise as provided in chapter 12.2 of title 46;
    3. To pay expenses of the agency and the department in administering the revolving fund. As part of the annual appropriations bill, the department shall set forth the gross amount of expenses received from the agency and a complete, specific breakdown of the sums retained and/or expended for administrative expenses;
    4. To pay or provide for subsidy assistance equivalent to one-third (1/3) of the market rate or such other subsidy assistance as determined by the agency;
    5. To provide a reserve for, or to otherwise secure, amounts payable by cities and towns on loans and city and town obligations outstanding in the event of default thereof; amounts in any account in the revolving fund may be applied to defaults on loans outstanding to the city or town for which the account was established and, on a parity basis with all other accounts, to defaults on any loans or city or town obligations outstanding; and
    6. To provide a reserve for, or to otherwise secure, by pledge, lien, assignment, or otherwise as provided in chapter 12.2 of title 46, any bonds of the agency.
  3. In addition to other remedies of the agency under any loan agreement or otherwise provided by law, the agency may also recover from a city or town, in an action in superior court, any amount due the agency together with any other actual damages the agency shall have sustained from the failure or refusal of the city or town to make the payments or abide by the terms of the loan agreement.
  4. Within ninety (90) days after the end of each fiscal year, the agency shall submit an annual report to the governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, and the secretary of state of its activities during that fiscal year. The report shall provide: a summary of the agency’s meetings including when the agency met, subjects addressed, decisions rendered and meeting minutes; a summary of the agency’s actions including a listing of rules, regulations, or procedures adopted or amended, applications received for financial assistance for contracts or agreements entered into, applications and intended use plans submitted to federal agencies for capitalization grants, properties acquired or leased, and bonds issued; a synopsis of any complaints, suspensions, or other legal matters related to the authority of the agency; a consolidated financial statement of all funds received and disbursed by the agency including the source of and recipient of the funds which shall be audited by an independent certified public accountant firm; copies of audits or reports required under federal law; a listing of the staff and/or consultants employed by the agency; a listing of findings and recommendation derived from agency activities; and a summary of performance during the previous fiscal year including accomplishments, shortcomings and remedies. The report shall be posted as prescribed in § 42-20-8.2 . The director of the department of administration shall be responsible for the enforcement of this provision. The initial report shall be due no later than January 1, 2015.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-6. Payment of state funds.

  1. Subject to the provisions of subsection (b), upon the written request of the agency, the general treasurer shall pay to the agency, from time to time, from the proceeds of any bonds or notes issued by the state for the purposes of this chapter or funds otherwise lawfully payable to the agency for the purposes of this chapter, such amounts as shall have been appropriated or lawfully designated for the revolving fund. All amounts so paid shall be credited to the revolving fund in addition to any other amounts credited or expected to be credited to the revolving fund.
  2. The agency and the state shall enter into, execute, and deliver one or more agreements setting forth or otherwise determining the terms, conditions, and procedures for, and the amount, time, and manner of payment of, all amounts available from the state to the agency under this section.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-7. Procedure for project approval.

  1. By September 1, 2013, the department shall promulgate rules and regulations establishing the project evaluation criteria and the process through which a city or town may submit an infrastructure plan. By December 31, 2013, the agency shall promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate the provisions of this chapter which may include, without limitation, forms for financial assistance applications, loan agreements, and other instruments. All rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter shall be promulgated in accordance with the provisions of chapter 35 of title 42.
  2. Cities and towns shall submit infrastructure plans to the department in accordance with the department’s rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.
  3. The department shall evaluate all submitted infrastructure plans and, in accordance with the project evaluation criteria, identify all eligible projects, and after a public hearing, the department shall finalize and provide the agency and statewide planning with a project priority list. The agency shall not award financial assistance to any project not listed on the project priority list.
  4. The agency shall not obligate more than fifty percent (50%) of available funding in any calendar year to any one city or town unless there are no other eligible projects on the project priority list.
  5. Upon issuance of the project priority list, the agency shall award financial assistance to cities and towns for approved projects. The agency may decline to award financial assistance to an approved project that the agency determines will have a substantial adverse effect on the interests of holders of bonds or other indebtedness of the agency or the interests of other participants in the financial assistance program, or for good and sufficient cause affecting the finances of the agency. All financial assistance shall be made pursuant to a loan agreement between the agency and the city or town, acting by and through the officer or officers, board, committee, or other body authorized by law, or otherwise its chief executive officer, according to terms and conditions as determined by the agency, and each loan shall be evidenced and secured by the issue to the agency of city or town obligations in fully marketable form in principal amount, bearing interest at the rate or rates specified in the applicable loan agreement, and shall otherwise bear such terms and conditions as authorized by this chapter and/or the loan agreement.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1; P.L. 2017, ch. 480, § 1.

24-18-8. Inspection of approved projects.

For any approved project, the department shall have the authority to inspect the construction and operation thereof to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-9. Expenses incurred by the department.

In order to provide for the expenses of the department under this chapter, the agency shall transfer to the department an amount from the revolving fund equal to the amount authorized by the general assembly.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.

24-18-10. Severability.

If any provision of this chapter or the application of this chapter to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter, which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

History of Section. P.L. 2013, ch. 144, art. 20, § 1.