Chapter 1. General Provisions.
Article 1. Definitions.
§ 38.2-100. Definitions.
As used in this title:
“Alien company” means a company incorporated or organized under the laws of any country other than the United States.
“Bureau” or “Bureau of Insurance” means the division of the Commission established to administer the insurance laws of the Commonwealth.
“Commission” means the State Corporation Commission.
“Commissioner” or “Commissioner of Insurance” means the administrative or executive officer of the Bureau.
“Company” means any association, aggregate of individuals, business, corporation, individual, joint-stock company, Lloyds type of organization, organization, partnership, receiver, reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, trustee or society.
“Domestic company” means a company incorporated or organized under the laws of the Commonwealth.
“Foreign company” means a company incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States, or of any state other than the Commonwealth.
“Health services plan” means any arrangement for offering or administering health services or similar or related services by a corporation licensed under Chapter 42 (§ 38.2-4200 et seq.).
“Insurance” means the business of transferring risk by contract wherein a person, for a consideration, undertakes (i) to indemnify another person, (ii) to pay or provide a specified or ascertainable amount of money, or (iii) to provide a benefit or service upon the occurrence of a determinable risk contingency. Without limiting the foregoing, “insurance” shall include (i) each of the classifications of insurance set forth in Article 2 (§ 38.2-101 et seq.) of this chapter and (ii) the issuance of group and individual contracts, certificates, or evidences of coverage by any health services plan as provided for in Chapter 42 (§ 38.2-4200 et seq.), health maintenance organization as provided for in Chapter 43 (§ 38.2-4300 et seq.), legal services organization or legal services plan as provided for in Chapter 44 (§ 38.2-4400 et seq.), dental or optometric services plan as provided for in Chapter 45 (§ 38.2-4500 et seq.), and dental plan organization as provided for in Chapter 61 (§ 38.2-6100 et seq.). “Insurance” shall not include any activity involving a home service contract that is subject to regulation pursuant to Chapter 33.1 (§ 59.1-434.1 et seq.) of Title 59.1; an extended service contract that is subject to regulation pursuant to Chapter 34 (§ 59.1-435 et seq.) of Title 59.1; a warranty made by a manufacturer, seller, lessor, or builder of a product or service; or a service agreement offered by an automobile club as defined in subsection E of § 38.2-514.1 .
“Insurance company” means any company engaged in the business of making contracts of insurance.
“Insurance transaction,” “insurance business,” and “business of insurance” include solicitation, negotiations preliminary to execution, execution of an insurance contract, and the transaction of matters subsequent to execution of the contract and arising out of it.
“Insurer” means an insurance company.
“Medicare” means the “Health Insurance for the Aged Act,” Title XVIII of the Social Security Amendment of 1965, as amended.
“Person” means any association, aggregate of individuals, business, company, corporation, individual, joint-stock company, Lloyds type of organization, organization, partnership, receiver, reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, trustee or society.
“Rate” or “rates” means any rate of premium, policy fee, membership fee or any other charge made by an insurer for or in connection with a contract or policy of insurance. The terms “rate” or “rates” shall not include a membership fee paid to become a member of an organization or association, one of the benefits of which is the purchasing of insurance coverage.
“Rate service organization” means any organization or person, other than a joint underwriting association under § 38.2-1915 or any employee of an insurer including those insurers under common control or management, who assists insurers in ratemaking or filing by:
- Collecting, compiling, and furnishing loss or expense statistics;
- Recommending, making or filing rates or supplementary rate information; or
-
Advising about rate questions, except as an attorney giving legal advice.
“State” means any commonwealth, state, territory, district or insular possession of the United States.
“Surplus to policyholders” means the excess of total admitted assets over the liabilities of an insurer, and shall be the sum of all capital and surplus accounts, including any voluntary reserves, minus any impairment of all capital and surplus accounts.
Without otherwise limiting the meaning of or defining the following terms, “insurance contracts” or “insurance policies” shall include contracts of fidelity, indemnity, guaranty and suretyship.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-1 , 38-1 94, 38-253.20, 38-253.67; 1952, c. 317, §§ 38.1-1 , 38.1-219; 1973, c. 504, § 38.1-279.30; 1980, c. 204, § 38.1-362.12; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 707; 2004, c. 668; 2017, cc. 653, 727; 2020, c. 264.
Cross references.
As to conduct prohibited by the General Assembly Conflicts of Interest Act, see § 30-103.
For requirement that applications for issuance and renewal of occupational licenses and registrations include the applicant’s social security number or a control number issued pursuant to § 46.2-342 , and provision for suspension of such license or registration for delinquency in support obligations, see § 63.2-1937 .
Editor’s note.
House Joint Resolution No. 1 of the 1984 Acts of Assembly directed the Virginia Code Commission to make a study of Title 38.1 and report to the Governor and the General Assembly its findings in the form of a revision of that title. In January, 1986, its report, containing a proposed revision of Title 38.1, was sent to the Governor and the General Assembly. The report was published as House Document No. 17 of the 1986 Session and served as the basis for this title, which was enacted by Acts 1986, c. 562, effective July 1, 1986.
In addition to its revision by Acts 1986, c. 562, Title 38.1 was amended by certain other acts during the 1986 Session. These amendments have been incorporated, as appropriate, into comparable provisions of this title, pursuant to § 30-152.
Many of the cases cited in the notes under sections of this title were decided under corresponding provisions of former Title 38.1 and earlier statutes.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 707 added the paragraph defining “Insurance,” and deleted “ ‘insurance’ shall include fidelity and suretyship, and” following “the following terms” in the last paragraph of the section.
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendment by c. 668, in the definition of “Insurance,” inserted “dental plan organization as provided for in Chapter 61 (§ 38.2-6100 et seq.) of this title” and made a related change.
The 2017 amendments.
The 2017 amendment by c. 653 added “or a service agreement offered by an automobile club as defined in subsection E of § 38.2-514.1 ” in the definition for “Insurance.”
The 2017 amendment by c. 727, effective January 1, 2018, in the definitions of “Health services plan” and “Insurance,” deleted “of this title” following the Chapter references; in the definition of “Insurance,” inserted “a home service contract that is subject to regulation pursuant to Chapter 33.1 (§ 59.1-434.1 et seq.) of Title 59.1.”
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 added the definition for “Bureau” or “Bureau of Insurance”; in the definition for “Commissioner” or “Commissioner of Insurance,” substituted “Bureau” for “division or bureau of the Commission established to administer the insurance laws of this Commonwealth”; in the definition for “Domestic company,” substituted “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth”; and in the definition for “Foreign company,” substituted “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth.”
Law Review.
For article, “The 1952 Revision of the Virginia Life Insurance Laws,” see 39 Va. L. Rev. 547 (1953).
For note on waiver, election and estoppel in Virginia insurance litigation, see 48 Va. L. Rev. 416 (1962).
For a note, “Self-Insurance as Insurance in Liability Policy — ‘Other Insurance’ Provisions,” see 56 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1245 (1999).
For an article, “The Impact of Convergence and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act on the Insurance Industry,” see 8 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 623 (2000).
Research References.
Business Insurance Law and Practice Guide (Matthew Bender).
Insurance Coverage for Environmental Claims (Matthew Bender). Lathrop.
Insurance and Risk Management for State and Local Governments (Matthew Bender). Rynard.
Law of Life and Health Insurance (Matthew Bender). Harnett and Lesnick.
New Appleman on Insurance: Current Critical Issues in Insurance Law (Matthew Bender).
Responsibilities of Insurance Agents and Brokers (Matthew Bender). Harnett.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, §§ 3, 4.
CASE NOTES
Motorists not required to have automobile liability insurance under this title. —
Nothing in this title requires any motorist, whether a resident or nonresident of Virginia, to have any automobile liability insurance as a condition to operate or use a motor vehicle in Virginia, and nothing therein requires those who elect to purchase insurance to have any minimum coverage. Reliance Ins. Cos. v. Darden, 217 Va. 694 , 232 S.E.2d 749, 1977 Va. LEXIS 225 (1977).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Municipal corporation “person” under the Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association Act. —
It is clear from the legislature’s stated purpose in the opening section of the Property Association Act that the goal is to protect claimants as a priority, and to that end and to recoup claims paid by the Virginia Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, the Act allows for the Guaranty Association to collect funds paid out from a narrow group of insured persons; the definition of “person” under the Act, § 38.2-100 , reads “any corporation,” and as a result and because a court is directed under § 38.2-1602 to liberally construe the Act to effect the purpose, the definition of “person,” as contemplated in the Act, does include municipal corporations. Va. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Chesapeake Hosp. Auth., 75 Va. Cir. 396, 2008 Va. Cir. LEXIS 264 (Chesapeake Aug. 25, 2008).
§ 38.2-100.1. Certified mail; subsequent mail or notices may be sent by regular mail.
Whenever in this title the Commissioner or the Commission is required to send any mail or notice by certified mail and such mail or notice is sent certified mail, return receipt requested, then any subsequent, identical mail or notice that is sent by the Commissioner or the Commission may be sent by regular mail.
History. 2011, c. 566.
Article 2. Insurance Classified and Defined.
§ 38.2-101. Classification of insurance.
Insurance is classified and defined as set out in subsequent sections of this article.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-2; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For survey of Virginia law on insurance for the year 1973-1974, see 60 Va. L. Rev. 1553 (1974).
§ 38.2-102. Life.
- “Life insurance” means insurance upon the lives of human beings. “Life insurance” includes policies that also provide (i) endowment benefits; (ii) additional benefits incidental to a loss in the event of death, dismemberment, or loss by accident or accidental means; (iii) additional benefits to safeguard the contract from lapse or to provide a special surrender value, a special benefit or an annuity, in the event of total and permanent disability of the insured; and (iv) optional modes of settlement of proceeds. As used in this title, unless the context requires otherwise, “life insurance” shall be deemed to include “credit life insurance,” “industrial life insurance,” “variable life insurance” and “modified guaranteed life insurance.”
- “Life insurance” also includes additional benefits to provide for educational loans, subject to the provisions of § 38.2-3113.3 .
- “Life insurance” also includes additional benefits providing specified disease coverage or limited benefit health coverage, subject to compliance with the minimum standards established by the Commission for such benefits pursuant to § 38.2-3519 . Such additional benefits may be combined in an individual policy, or added as a rider to the policy, provided that the insurer offering such additional benefits is licensed to transact the business of accident and sickness insurance and complies with the rate and form filing requirements of the Commission’s rules governing the filing of rates for individual and certain group accident and sickness insurance policy forms (14 VAC 5-130-10 et seq.), as amended.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-3; 1976, c. 562; 1986, c. 562; 1992, c. 210; 2000, c. 173; 2011, c. 186; 2012, c. 673.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 173 designated the former single paragraph as subsection A, and added subsection B.
The 2011 amendments.
The 2011 amendment by c. 186 added subsection C.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 673 substituted “benefits incidental to a loss in the event of death, dismemberment, or loss by accident” for “benefits in the event of death, dismemberment, or loss of sight by accident” in clause (ii) of subsection A.
CASE NOTES
Difference between life and accident insurance. —
It is apparent that life insurance means insurance against death regardless of cause. It is equally apparent that accident and sickness insurance means insurance against death caused only by accident or, where the policy so provides, by accident or sickness, or both. Gudnason v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 231 Va. 197 , 343 S.E.2d 54, 1986 Va. LEXIS 181 (1986).
§ 38.2-103. Credit life.
“Credit life insurance” means insurance on the life of a debtor pursuant to or in connection with a specific loan or other credit transaction.
History. 1960, c. 67, § 38.1-482.2; 1982, c. 223; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-104. Industrial life.
“Industrial life insurance” means life insurance provided by an individual insurance contract (i) under which premiums are payable at least monthly and (ii) that has the words “industrial policy” printed upon the policy as a part of the descriptive matter.
History. Code 1950, § 38-433; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-409; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-105. Variable life.
“Variable life insurance” means any policy or contract of life insurance in which the amount or duration of benefits may vary according to the investment experience of any separate account maintained by the insurer for the policy or contract, as provided for in § 38.2-3113 .
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-105.1. Modified guaranteed life insurance.
“Modified guaranteed life insurance” means any policy or contract of life insurance in which the benefits are guaranteed if held for specified periods and nonforfeiture values are based upon a market-value adjustment formula if held for shorter periods. The formula may or may not reflect the investment experience of any separate account which may be maintained by the insurer for the policy or contract as provided for in § 38.2-3113.1 .
History. 1992, c. 210.
§ 38.2-106. Annuities.
“Annuities” means all agreements to make periodic payments in specified or calculable sums pursuant to the terms of a contract for a stated period of time or for the life of the person or persons specified in the contract. “Annuities” does not include contracts defined in § 38.2-102 and qualified charitable gift annuities as defined in § 38.2-106.1 .
As used in this title, unless the context requires otherwise, “annuity” shall be deemed to include “variable annuity” and “modified guaranteed annuity,” and shall be deemed to include a contract under which a lump sum cash settlement is an alternative to the option of periodic payments.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-4; 1966, c. 289; 1970, c. 532; 1985, c. 312; 1986, c. 562; 1992, c. 210; 1993, c. 764; 1996, c. 425; 2001, c. 64.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1996, c. 425, cl. 2, provides: “[t]hat the provisions of this act amending § 38.2-106 , the definition of ‘charitable gift annuity’ as added by this act in § 38.2-106 .1, and subsections A and C in § 38.2-3113.2 as added by this act are declarative of existing law.”
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 64 substituted “specified or calculable sums” for “fixed dollar amounts.”
§ 38.2-106.1. Charitable gift annuities.
For purposes of this title:
“Charitable gift annuity” means an agreement by a charitable organization to make periodic payments in fixed dollar amounts payable over one or two lives, under which the actuarial value of the annuity, as determined for federal tax purposes, is less than the value of the cash or other property transferred by the donor in return therefor and the difference in value constitutes a charitable contribution for federal tax purposes.
“Charitable organization” means an entity described in:
- § 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. § 501 (c) (3)); or
- § 170 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. § 170 (c)).“Qualified charitable gift annuity” means a charitable gift annuity that conforms to the requirements of § 501 (m) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. § 501 (m) (5)) and § 514 (c) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. § 514 (c) (5)) and that is issued by a charitable organization that on the date of the annuity agreement:
1. Has a minimum of $100,000 in unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, or publicly traded securities, exclusive of the assets contributed by the donor in return for the annuity agreement; and
2. Has been in continuous operation as a charitable organization for at least three years or is a successor or affiliate of a charitable organization that has been in continuous operation as such for at least three years.
History. 1996, c. 425.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1996, c. 425, cl. 2, provides: “[t]hat the provisions of this act amending § 38.2-106 , the definition of ‘charitable gift annuity’ as added by this act in § 38.2-106 .1, and subsections A and C in § 38.2-3113.2 as added by this act are declarative of existing law.”
§ 38.2-107. Variable annuity.
“Variable annuity” means any agreement or contract for an annuity in which the amount or duration of benefits or optional lump sum cash settlement may vary according to the investment experience of any separate account maintained by the insurer for the policy or contract as provided for in § 38.2-3113 . Pursuant to the terms of the contract, payments may be made for a stated period of time or for the life of the person or persons specified in the contract.
History. 1986, c. 562; 1993, c. 764.
§ 38.2-107.1. Modified guaranteed annuity.
“Modified guaranteed annuity” means any agreement or contract for an annuity in which the benefits are guaranteed if held for specified periods and nonforfeiture values are based upon a market-value adjustment formula if held for shorter periods. The formula may or may not reflect the investment experience of any separate account which may be maintained by the insurer for the agreement or contract as provided for in § 38.2-3113.1 .
History. 1992, c. 210.
§ 38.2-108. Credit accident and sickness.
“Credit accident and sickness insurance” means insurance on a debtor to provide for payments on a specific loan or other credit transaction while the debtor is disabled as defined in the policy.
History. 1960, c. 67, § 38.1-482.2; 1982, c. 223; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-109. Accident and sickness.
- “Accident and sickness insurance” means insurance against loss resulting from sickness, or from bodily injury or death by accident or accidental means, or from a combination of any or all of these perils. As used in this title, unless the context requires otherwise, the term “accident and sickness insurance” shall be deemed to include “credit accident and sickness insurance.”
-
The term “accident and sickness insurance” shall also include agreements insuring against losses resulting from health care claims or expenses of health care in excess of a specific or aggregate dollar amount, when such agreements are used to provide
coverage to (i) an employee welfare benefit plan or any other plan providing accident and sickness benefits, (ii) a health maintenance organization, or (iii) a provider associated with a managed care network, provided:
- The agreement clearly discloses the extent and duration of the liability assumed by the insurer once the policyholder’s liability has been exceeded; and
- The insurer maintains reserves in accordance with § 38.2-1314 for the liability it assumes under the agreement.Such agreements shall not be subject to the requirements of Chapters 34 (§ 38.2-3400 et seq.) and 35 (§ 38.2-3500 et seq.) of this title.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-5; 1986, c. 562; 1997, c. 28.
CASE NOTES
“Accident” defined. —
An accident is an event that takes place without one’s foresight or expectation, an undesigned, sudden, and unexpected event; further, it is generally held that if the insured voluntarily provokes or is the aggressor in an encounter, and knows, or under the circumstances should reasonably anticipate, that he will be in danger of death or great bodily harm as the natural or probable consequence of his act or course of action, his death or injury is not caused by an accident within the meaning of such a policy. Harris v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 222 Va. 45 , 278 S.E.2d 809, 1981 Va. LEXIS 271 (1981).
Difference between life and accident insurance. —
It is apparent that life insurance means insurance against death regardless of cause. It is equally apparent that accident and sickness insurance means insurance against death caused only by accident or, where the policy so provides, by accident or sickness, or both. Gudnason v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 231 Va. 197 , 343 S.E.2d 54, 1986 Va. LEXIS 181 (1986).
Issue of accident improperly decided by court. —
In an action claiming that defendant insurance company breached a contract insuring plaintiff’s husband against accidental death or dismemberment, where evidence showed that the husband was stabbed to death by another woman with whom he lived after the husband had disciplined the woman’s child and pushed the woman, the trial court erred in deciding as a matter of law that the husband’s death was not an accident, since whether the husband should have anticipated that his disciplining the child or his pushing the woman would lead to a violent reaction presented a factual issue dependent on the relationship of the parties and the circumstances of the incident. Harris v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 222 Va. 45 , 278 S.E.2d 809, 1981 Va. LEXIS 271 (1981).
§ 38.2-110. Fire.
“Fire insurance” means insurance against loss of or damage to any property resulting from fire, including loss or damage incident (i) to extinguishing a fire, or (ii) to the salvaging of property in connection with a fire.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-6; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-111. Miscellaneous property and casualty.
-
“Miscellaneous property insurance” means insurance against loss of or damage to property resulting from:
- Lightning, smoke or smudge, windstorm, tornado, cyclone, earthquake, volcanic eruption, rain, hail, frost and freeze, weather or climatic conditions, excess or deficiency of moisture, flood, the rising of the waters of the ocean or its tributaries; or
- Insects, blights, or disease of such property other than animals; or
- Electrical disturbance causing or concomitant with a fire or an explosion; or
- The ownership, maintenance or use of elevators, except loss or damage by fire. This class of insurance includes the incidental power to make inspections of and to issue certificates of inspection upon any such elevator; or
-
Bombardment, invasion, insurrection, riot, civil war or commotion, military or usurped power, any order of a civil authority made to prevent the spread of a conflagration, epidemic or catastrophe, vandalism or malicious mischief, strike or lockout, collapse
from any cause, or explosion; but not including any kind of insurance specified in §
38.2-115
, except insurance against loss or damage to property resulting from:
- Explosion of pressure vessels, except steam boilers of more than fifteen pounds pressure, in buildings designed and used solely for residential purposes by not more than four families;
- Explosion of any kind originating outside of the insured building or outside of the building containing the insured property;
- Explosion of pressure vessels not containing steam; or
- Electrical disturbance causing or concomitant with an explosion; or
- Any other cause or hazard which may result in a loss or damage to property, if the insurance is not contrary to law or public policy.
- “Miscellaneous casualty insurance” means insurance against liability, and against loss, damage, or expense arising out of injury to the economic interests of any person, but not including any class of insurance otherwise specified in this title, provided that such insurance is not contrary to law or public policy, except that any policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death, dismemberment, sickness, or injury of any person, and death and dismemberment benefits in the event of death or dismemberment, if the death, dismemberment, sickness, or injury is caused by or is incidental to a cause of loss insured under the policy.
History. 1952, c. 317, §§ 38.1-7, 38.1-12; 1986, c. 562; 2004, c. 182; 2007, c. 762.
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendment by c. 182 inserted the A designation at the beginning of the first paragraph and added subsection B.
The 2007 amendments.
The 2007 amendment by c. 762 added the exception to the end of subsection B.
§ 38.2-112. Water damage.
“Water damage insurance” means insurance against loss or damage to any property by water or other fluid or substance resulting from (i) the breakage or leakage of sprinklers, pumps or other apparatus erected for extinguishing fires or of water pipes or other conduits or containers, or (ii) casual water entering through leaks or openings in buildings or by seepage through building walls, but not including loss or damage resulting from flood or the rising of the waters of the ocean or its tributaries. This class of insurance includes insurance against accidental injury of such sprinklers, pumps, fire apparatus, conduits or containers.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-8; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-113. Burglary and theft.
“Burglary and theft insurance” means insurance against:
- Loss of or damage to any property resulting from actual or attempted burglary, theft, larceny, robbery, forgery, fraud, vandalism, malicious mischief, wrongful confiscation or wrongful conversion, disposal or concealment by any person or persons;
- Loss of or damage to moneys, coins, bullion, securities, notes, drafts, acceptances or any other valuable papers or documents, resulting from any cause, except while in the custody or possession of and being transported by any carrier for hire or in the mail; or
- The loss of property actually surrendered due to extortion, threat, or demand, involving the actual, alleged or threatened kidnapping of any individual or the threat to do bodily injury to or damage to property of or to wrongfully abduct or detain any individual.Any policy of burglary and theft insurance may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death, dismemberment, sickness, or injury of any person, and death and dismemberment benefits in the event of death or dismemberment, if the death, dismemberment, sickness, or injury is caused by or is incidental to a cause of loss insured under the policy.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-9; 1986, c. 562; 2007, c. 762.
The 2007 amendments.
The 2007 amendment by c. 762 added the last paragraph.
CASE NOTES
Theft requires intent to deprive owner permanently. —
Under the terms of an automobile insurance policy, in order to constitute a theft there must be present an intent permanently to deprive the owner of the vehicle. If it is shown that the alleged thief intended to return the vehicle after using it temporarily, there is no theft. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Ford, 208 Va. 151 , 156 S.E.2d 606, 1967 Va. LEXIS 198 (1967).
Taking without requisite intent is not within coverage of theft insurance policy. —
The taking of a car, unaccompanied by an intent permanently to deprive the owner of the car, is a crime separate from the crime of larceny. A taking without the requisite intent is not within the coverage of a theft insurance policy. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Ford, 208 Va. 151 , 156 S.E.2d 606, 1967 Va. LEXIS 198 (1967).
§ 38.2-114. Glass insurance.
“Glass insurance” means insurance against loss of or damage to glass and its appurtenances resulting from any cause.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-10; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-115. Boiler and machinery.
“Boiler and machinery insurance” means insurance against any liability of the insured and against loss of or damage to any property of the insured resulting from the explosion of or injury to (i) any boiler, heater or other fired pressure vessel; (ii) any unfired pressure vessel; (iii) any pipes or containers connected with any of the boilers or vessels; (iv) any engine, turbine, compressor, pump or wheel; (v) any apparatus generating, transmitting or using electricity; or (vi) any other machinery or apparatus connected with or operated by any of the previously named boilers, vessels or machines. Boiler and machinery insurance includes the incidental power to inspect and to issue certificates of inspection upon any such boilers, pressure vessels, apparatus, and machinery.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-11; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 8A M.J. Explosions and Explosives, § 9.
§ 38.2-116. Animal.
“Animal insurance” means insurance against loss of or damage to any animal resulting from any cause.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-13; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-117. Personal injury liability.
“Personal injury liability insurance” means insurance against legal liability of the insured, and against loss, damage or expense incident to a claim of such liability, arising out of the death or injury of any person, or arising out of injury to the economic interests of any person as the result of negligence in rendering expert, fiduciary or professional service, but not including any class of insurance specified in § 38.2-119 .
Any policy of personal injury liability insurance may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death or injury of any person, regardless of any legal liability of the insured.
History. Code 1950, § 38-239; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-15; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-118. Property damage liability.
“Property damage liability insurance” means insurance against legal liability of the insured, and against loss, damage or expense incident to a claim of such liability, arising out of the loss or destruction of, or damage to, the property of any other person, but not including any class of insurance specified in § 38.2-117 or § 38.2-119 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-16; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-119. Workers’ compensation and employers’ liability.
“Workers’ compensation and employers’ liability insurance” means insurance against the legal liability of any employer for the death or disablement of, or injury to, his or its employee whether imposed by common law or by statute, or assumed by contract.
Employers’ liability insurance may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, chiropractic, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death or injury of an employee, regardless of any legal liability of the insured.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-17; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-120. Fidelity.
“Fidelity insurance” means:
- Indemnifying any person against loss through counterfeit, forgery or alteration of, on, or in any security obligation or other written instrument; or
- Indemnifying banks, bankers, brokers, financial or moneyed corporations or associations against loss resulting from any cause, of personal property, including fixtures, equipment, safes and vaults on the insured’s premises.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-18; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-121. Surety.
“Surety insurance” means:
- Becoming surety or guarantor for any person, in any public or private position or place of trust, whether the guarantee is in an individual, schedule or blanket form; or
- Becoming surety on or guaranteeing the performance of any lawful obligation, undertaking, agreement, or contract, including reinsurance contracts connected therewith, except policies of insurance; or
- Becoming surety on or guaranteeing the performance of bonds and undertakings required or permitted in all judicial proceedings or otherwise allowed by law, including surety bonds accepted by state and municipal authorities in lieu of deposits as security for the performance of insurance contracts.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-18; 1986, c. 562.
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Surety bail bondsman. —
A surety bail bondsman who executes a secured bail bond as a disclosed agent-in-fact for the stated corporate surety is not personally liable to the Commonwealth when the criminal defendant absconds, and the bond is forfeited. See opinion of Attorney General to The Honorable James S. Mathews, Judge, Norfolk General District Court, 09-025, (6/1/09).
A surety bail bondsman serves only as an agent-in-fact for the surety company and binds the surety company to bail bonds executed on behalf of the surety company, thus a surety bail bondsman operating within the bounds of his authority cannot be held personally liable to the Commonwealth for forfeited bonds when a defendant fails to comply with a condition of the bond. See opinion of Attorney General to The Honorable James S. Mathews, Judge, Norfolk General District Court, 09-025, (6/1/09).
§ 38.2-122. Credit.
“Credit insurance” means indemnifying merchants or other persons extending credit against loss or damage resulting from the nonpayment of debts owed to them. “Credit insurance” includes the incidental power to acquire and dispose of debts so insured and to collect any debts owed to the insurer or to any persons so insured by the insurer. “Credit insurance” does not include any insurance defined in §§ 38.2-103 , 38.2-108 , 38.2-122.1 , 38.2-122.2 or § 38.2-128 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-19; 1986, c. 562; 2000, c. 526.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 526 inserted “38.2-122.1, 38.2-122.2 .”
§ 38.2-122.1. Credit involuntary unemployment insurance.
“Credit involuntary unemployment insurance” means insurance on a debtor in connection with a specified loan or other credit transaction to provide payment to a creditor for the installment payments or other periodic payments becoming due (i) while the debtor is involuntarily unemployed, or (ii) while the debtor is on an unpaid leave of absence during which employment does not terminate. Such term shall not mean any insurance defined in §§ 38.2-108 , 38.2-109 or § 38.2-122 .
History. 1993, c. 774; 2000, c. 526.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 526, in the first sentence, inserted the clause (i) designation, inserted “or,” and added clause (ii), and inserted “§§ 38.2-108 , 38.2-109 or” in the last sentence.
§ 38.2-122.2. Credit property insurance.
“Credit property insurance” means insurance against direct physical damage to personal household property used as security for a loan or other credit transaction. Such insurance may insure the creditor as sole beneficiary or may insure both the creditor and the debtor with the creditor as primary beneficiary and the debtor as beneficiary of proceeds not paid to the creditor. For purposes of this definition, “personal household property” does not include motor vehicles, mobile homes, or watercraft. The term “credit property insurance” shall not mean any insurance defined in § 38.2-122 .
History. 2000, c. 526.
§ 38.2-123. Title.
“Title insurance” means insurance against loss by reason of liens and encumbrances upon property, defects in the title to property, and other matters affecting the title to property or the right to the use and enjoyment of property. “Title insurance” includes insurance of the condition of the title to property and the status of any lien on property.
History. Code 1950, § 38-233; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-20; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-124. Motor vehicle.
-
“Motor vehicle insurance” means insurance against:
- Loss of or damage to motor vehicles, including trailers, semitrailers or other attachments designed for use in connection with motor vehicles, resulting from any cause, and against legal liability of the insured for loss or damage to the property of another resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of motor vehicles and against loss, damage or expense incident to a claim of such liability; or
- Legal liability of the insured, and liability arising under subsection A of § 38.2-2206 and against loss, damage, or expense incident to a claim of such liability, arising out of the death or injury of any person resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of motor vehicles. Motor vehicle insurance does not include any class of insurance specified in § 38.2-119 .
- Any policy of “motor vehicle insurance” covering legal liability of the insured under subdivision 2 of subsection A and covering liability arising under subsection A of § 38.2-2206 may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay to the covered injured person medical expense and loss of income benefits arising out of the death or injury of any person, as set forth in subsection A of § 38.2-2201 . Any such policy of motor vehicle insurance may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay weekly indemnity or other specific benefits to persons who are injured and specific death benefits to dependents, beneficiaries or personal representatives of persons who are killed, if the injury or death is caused by accident and sustained while in or upon, entering or alighting from, or through being struck by a motor vehicle while not occupying a motor vehicle. These provisions shall obligate the insurer to make payment regardless of any legal liability of the insured or any other person.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-21; 1956, c. 678; 1962, c. 253; 1983, c. 448; 1984, c. 311; 1986, c. 562; 1991, c. 4; 1996, c. 276.
Cross references.
As to insurance coverage for exempted motor vehicles, see § 46.2-684.1 . As to offers to pay insurance deductible when installing or repairing motor vehicle glass, see § 59.1-207.5:1.
Law Review.
For article, “An Overview of Automobile Liability Insurance in Virginia,” see 28 U. Rich. L. Rev. 863 (1994).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 4.
CASE NOTES
Policy must provide coverage prescribed by this section. —
While this section may constitute the basis upon which an insurer voluntarily writes medical payments insurance, once coverage is provided, it must be written to provide at least the coverage herein prescribed. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Seay, 236 Va. 275 , 373 S.E.2d 910, 5 Va. Law Rep. 876, 1988 Va. LEXIS 161 (1988).
The language “while in or upon . . . a motor vehicle” in subsection B applies to coverage for both medical payments and weekly indemnity benefits. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Seay, 236 Va. 275 , 373 S.E.2d 910, 5 Va. Law Rep. 876, 1988 Va. LEXIS 161 (1988).
Clause applies only to weekly indemnity or other specific benefits. —
The statutory clause mandating coverage for injuries sustained “through being struck by a motor vehicle” applies only with respect to weekly indemnity or other specific benefits. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Major, 239 Va. 375 , 389 S.E.2d 307, 6 Va. Law Rep. 1588, 1990 Va. LEXIS 34 (1990).
Where the medical payments provision of insured’s policy did not comply with the requirements of this section, this section would prevail and supersede the inconsistent policy provision; therefore, the term “motor vehicle” was incorporated into the medical payments provision and construed to include a motorcycle, entitling insured to coverage. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Seay, 236 Va. 275 , 373 S.E.2d 910, 5 Va. Law Rep. 876, 1988 Va. LEXIS 161 (1988).
Section held to supersede conflicting policy provision as to nonoccupancy. —
By mandating the use of “while not occupying a motor vehicle” language in the medical payments provisions of automobile liability policies, the State Corporation Commission created an irreconcilable conflict between such provisions and this section, and this section would supersede the conflicting provisions. Virginia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jerrell, 236 Va. 261 , 373 S.E.2d 913, 5 Va. Law Rep. 857, 1988 Va. LEXIS 154 (1988).
This section extends coverage to injuries sustained through being struck by a motor vehicle, without any qualifications regarding the nonoccupancy of the motor vehicle; therefore, this section superseded an insurance policy provision purporting to limit coverage to injuries sustained “while not occupying a motor vehicle, through being struck by a motor vehicle,” making such provision ineffective to limit coverage. Virginia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jerrell, 236 Va. 261 , 373 S.E.2d 913, 5 Va. Law Rep. 857, 1988 Va. LEXIS 154 (1988).
§ 38.2-125. Aircraft.
“Aircraft insurance” means insurance against:
- Loss of or damage to aircraft and its equipment, resulting from any cause, and against legal liability of the insured for loss of or damage to the property of another resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of aircraft and against loss, damage or expense incident to a claim of liability; or
-
Legal liability of the insured, and against loss, damage, or expense incident to a claim of liability, arising out of the death or injury of any person resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of aircraft.
Any policy of “aircraft insurance” covering legal liability of the insured under subdivision 2 of this section may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, chiropractic, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death or injury of any person.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-21; 1956, c. 678; 1962, c. 253; 1983, c. 448; 1984, c. 311; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For article on the law governing airplane accidents, see 39 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1303 (1982).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 2C M.J. Aviation, § 1.
§ 38.2-126. Marine.
-
“Marine insurance” means insurance against any kind of loss or damage to:
- Vessels, craft, aircraft, vehicles of every kind, excluding vehicles operating under their own power or while in storage not incidental to transportation, as well as all goods, freights, cargoes, merchandise, effects, disbursements, profits, moneys, bullion, precious stones, securities, choses in action, evidences of debt, valuable papers, bottomry and respondentia interests and all other kinds of property and interests therein in respect to any risks or perils of navigation, transit or transportation, including war risks, on or under any seas or other waters, on land or in the air, or while being assembled, packed, crated, baled, compressed or similarly prepared for shipment or while awaiting shipment, or during any delays, storage, transshipment, or reshipment incident to shipment, including marine builders’ risks and all personal property floater risks;
- Persons or property in connection with or appertaining to marine, inland marine, transit or transportation insurance, including liability for loss of or damage to either arising out of or in connection with the construction, repair, operation, maintenance, or use of the subject matter of the insurance. This class of insurance shall not include life insurance, surety bonds or insurance against loss by reason of bodily injury to the person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of automobiles;
- Precious stones, jewels, jewelry, gold, silver and other precious metals used in business, trade, or otherwise and whether or not in transit. This class of insurance shall include jewelers’ block insurance;
-
- Bridges, tunnels, and other instrumentalities of transportation and communication, excluding buildings, their furniture and furnishings, fixed contents and supplies held in storage, unless fire, tornado, sprinkler leakage, hail, explosion, earthquake, riot, and civil commotion are the only hazards to be covered; (ii) to piers, wharves, docks, and slips, excluding the risks of fire, tornado, sprinkler leakage, hail, explosion, earthquake, riot and civil commotion; and (iii) to other aids to navigation and transportation, including dry docks and marine railways, against all risks. 4. (i) Bridges, tunnels, and other instrumentalities of transportation and communication, excluding buildings, their furniture and furnishings, fixed contents and supplies held in storage, unless fire, tornado, sprinkler leakage, hail, explosion, earthquake, riot, and civil commotion are the only hazards to be covered; (ii) to piers, wharves, docks, and slips, excluding the risks of fire, tornado, sprinkler leakage, hail, explosion, earthquake, riot and civil commotion; and (iii) to other aids to navigation and transportation, including dry docks and marine railways, against all risks.
- Marine insurance shall also include “marine protection and indemnity insurance,” meaning insurance against loss, damage, or expense or against legal liability of the insured for loss, damage, or expense arising out of or incident to ownership, operation, chartering, maintenance, use, repair or construction of any vessel, craft or instrumentality in use in ocean or inland waterways, including liability of the insured for personal injury, illness or death or for loss of or damage to the property of another person.
- Any policy of “marine insurance” as defined in this section providing protection against bodily injury, sickness or death of another person may include appropriate provisions obligating the insurer to pay medical, hospital, surgical, and funeral expenses arising out of the death or injury of any person, regardless of any legal liability of the insured.
- Marine insurance shall also include “travel insurance” as defined in § 38.2-1887 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-22; 1986, c. 562; 2019, cc. 266, 346.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2019, cc. 266 and 346, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act shall apply to policies of travel insurance purchased on or after July 1, 2019.”
The 2019 amendments.
The 2019 amendments by cc. 266 and 346 are identical, and added subsection D. For applicability clause, see Editor’s note.
§ 38.2-127. Legal services insurance.
“Legal services insurance” means the assumption of a contractual obligation to reimburse the insured against, or pay on behalf of the insured, all or a portion of his fees, costs, and expenses related to services performed by or under the supervision of an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where the services are performed.
History. 1976, c. 636, § 38.1-22.1; 1978, c. 658; 1986, c. 562.
Cross references.
As to contracts and plans for future legal services, see § 38.2-4400 et seq.
Law Review.
For discussion of legislative developments with regard to prepaid legal services in the 1978 Session of the General Assembly, see 12 U. Rich. L. Rev. 759 (1978).
§ 38.2-128. Mortgage guaranty insurance.
“Mortgage guaranty insurance” means indemnifying lenders against financial loss arising from nonpayment of principal, interest, or other sums due under the terms of any evidence of indebtedness secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument constituting a lien or charge on real property.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-129. Home protection insurance.
“Home protection insurance” means any contract or agreement whereby a person undertakes for a specified period of time and for a predetermined fee to furnish, arrange for, or indemnify for service, repair, or replacement of any or all of the structural components, parts, appliances, or systems of any covered residential dwelling caused by wear and tear, deterioration, inherent defect, or by the failure of any inspection to detect the likelihood of failure.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-130. Homeowners insurance.
“Homeowners insurance” is a combination multi-peril policy written under the provisions of § 38.2-1921 containing fire, miscellaneous property, and liability coverages, insuring primarily (i) owner-occupied residential real property pursuant to § 38.2-2108 , (ii) personal property located in residential units, or (iii) any combination thereof.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-131. Farmowners insurance.
“Farmowners insurance” is a combination multi-peril policy written under the provisions of § 38.2-1921 containing fire, miscellaneous property, and liability coverages, insuring primarily (i) farm and related residential property and improvements to real property owned, leased, or operated as a farm, (ii) personal property located in residential units, (iii) other real or personal property usual or incidental to the operation of a farm, or (iv) any combination thereof.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-132. Commercial multi-peril insurance.
“Commercial multi-peril insurance” is a combination multi-peril policy written under the provisions of § 38.2-1921 insuring risks incident to a commercial enterprise containing any combination of the classes of insurance set forth in subsection A of § 38.2-1902 , except insurance on or with respect to operating properties of railroads.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-133. Contingent and consequential losses.
The definition of any class of insurance against loss of or damage to property enumerated in this article may include insurance against contingent, consequential and indirect losses resulting from any of the causes set out in this article. Coverage for these losses shall be included in the specific grouping of the class of insurance where the cause is specified. Insurance against loss of or damage to property may include insurance against loss or damage to all lawful interests in the property, and against loss of use and occupancy, rents, and profits resulting from the loss or damage.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-23; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-134. Definitions to include other insurance of same general kind.
The definition of any class of insurance enumerated in this article shall include insurance against other loss, damage or liability of the same general nature or character, or of a similar kind, if the insurance may reasonably and properly be included in the definition and is not specifically included in the definition of some other class of insurance.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-24; 1986, c. 562.
Article 3. Classes of Insurance Companies May Write; Reinsurance.
§ 38.2-135. Classes of insurance companies may be licensed to write.
Except as otherwise provided in this title and subject to any conditions and restrictions imposed therein, any insurer licensed to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth, other than life insurers and title insurers, may be licensed to write one or more of the classes of insurance enumerated in Article 2 (§ 38.2-101 et seq.) of this chapter that it is authorized under its charter to write, except life insurance, industrial life insurance, credit life insurance, variable life insurance, modified guaranteed life insurance, annuities, variable annuities, modified guaranteed annuities, and title insurance. An insurer licensed to write life insurance shall not be licensed to write any additional class of insurance except modified guaranteed life insurance, variable life insurance, annuities, modified guaranteed annuities, variable annuities, credit life insurance, credit accident and sickness insurance, accident and sickness insurance, and industrial life insurance. An insurer licensed to write title insurance shall not be licensed to write any additional class of insurance. However, any life insurer that has been licensed to write and has been actively engaged in writing life insurance and any additional class of insurance set out in Article 2 (§ 38.2-101 et seq.) of this chapter continuously during a period of twenty years immediately preceding July 1, 1952, may continue to be licensed to write those classes of insurance. No company shall write any class of insurance unless it has a current annual license from the Commission to do so.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-159, 38-504; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-25; 1978, c. 20; 1986, c. 562; 1994, c. 316; 1995, c. 789.
§ 38.2-136. Reinsurance.
- Except as otherwise provided in this title, any insurer licensed to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth may, by policy, treaty or other agreement, cede to or accept from any insurer reinsurance upon the whole or any part of any risk, with or without contingent liability or participation, and, if a mutual insurer, with or without membership therein.
- No insurer licensed in this Commonwealth shall cede or assume policy obligations on risks located in this Commonwealth whereby the assuming insurer assumes the policy obligations of the ceding insurer as direct obligations of the assuming insurer to the payees under the policies and in substitution for the obligations of the ceding insurer to the payees, unless: (i) the policyholder has consented to the assumption and (ii) the assuming insurer is licensed in this Commonwealth to write the class or classes of insurance applicable to the policy obligations assumed.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection B, the transfer of risk under any reinsurance agreement may be effected by entry of an order by the Commission approving the transaction whenever (i) the Commission finds a licensed insurer to be impaired or in hazardous financial condition, (ii) a delinquency proceeding has been instituted against the licensed insurer for the purpose of conserving, rehabilitating, or liquidating the insurer, or (iii) the Commission finds, after giving the insurer notice and an opportunity to be heard, that the transfer of the contracts is in the best interests of the policyholders. In granting any such approval, the Commission shall ensure that policyholders do not lose any rights or claims afforded under their original policies pursuant to Chapter 16 (§ 38.2-1600 et seq.) or 17 (§ 38.2-1700 et seq.) of this title. Prior to granting an approval under clause (iii), the Commission shall consider whether there is a reasonable expectation that the ceding insurer may not be able to meet its obligations to all policyholders; whether the ceding insurer’s continued operation in this Commonwealth may become hazardous to policyholders, creditors and the public in this Commonwealth; or whether the ceding insurer may otherwise be unable to comply with the provisions of this title.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-160, 38-519; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-26; 1986, c. 562; 1993, c. 158.
§ 38.2-137. Flood insurance.
“Flood insurance” means insurance against loss or damage to any property caused by flooding or the rising of the waters of the ocean or its tributaries.
History. 1990, c. 916.
Editor’s note.
Repeal of this section by Acts 1997, c. 590 was contingent on funding in the general appropriation act. The funding was not provided, and therefore, the repeal never took effect.
Chapter 2. Provisions of a General Nature.
§ 38.2-200. General powers of the Commission relative to insurance.
- The Commission is charged with the execution of all laws relating to insurance and insurers. All companies, domestic, foreign, and alien, transacting or licensed to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth are subject to inspection, supervision and regulation by the Commission.
- All licenses granting the authority to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth shall be granted and issued by the Commission under its seal. The licenses shall be in addition to the certificates of authority required of foreign corporations under §§ 13.1-757 and 13.1-919 .
-
During an emergency, public health or otherwise, which the Commission, in its discretion, determines may inhibit the Commission’s ability to issue or renew licenses and registrations under this title, or which may hinder licensees’ ability to meet licensure
requirements, the Commission may temporarily suspend, authorize extensions of time for, or waive requirements for issuance or renewal of a license or registration under this title. The Commission may (i) issue temporary licenses
and registrations, (ii) suspend examination requirements, or (iii) take other necessary measures to ensure that licensees and registrants under this title can continue to transact the business of insurance in the Commonwealth during
the emergency.When temporarily suspending, authorizing extensions of time for, or waiving requirements for issuance or renewal of a license or registration pursuant to this subsection, the Commission shall issue an order specifying:
- The nature and basis of the emergency;
- Each line of insurance business to which the order applies, if applicable;
- The requirements for temporary licensure or registration and other relief, if applicable;
- The requirements for issuance or renewal of licenses or registrations that the Commission is suspending, authorizing extensions of time for, or waiving; and
- The duration of the order, not to exceed 120 days unless renewed by the Commission.
History. Code 1950, § 38-2; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-29; 1986, c. 562; 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 297.
Cross references.
As to procedures for preventing disclosure of confidential proprietary information submitted to the Commission pursuant to this section, see § 38.2-221.1 .
For other provisions as to licenses and certificates of authority, see § 38.2-1024 et seq. See also Va. Const., Art. IX.
The 2021 Sp. Sess. I amendments.
The 2021 amendment by Sp. Sess. I, c. 297, effective July 1, 2021, added subsection C.
Law Review.
For article analyzing ratemaking issues under the SCC, see 14 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 601 (1973).
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
Title 38.2 is a set of laws enacted for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance. Am. Chiropractic v. Trigon Healthcare, 367 F.3d 212, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8906 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 979, 125 S. Ct. 479, 160 L. Ed. 2d 356, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 7418 (2004).
Federal RICO action barred. —
To permit a federal RICO cause of action to proceed against a Virginia health care plan would impair, invalidate, and supersede existing Virginia insurance laws; therefore, such a cause of action was barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Am. Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc., 151 F. Supp. 2d 723, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10348 (W.D. Va. 2001).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
In general. —
Self-insurance is not treated as the equivalent of insurance under Virginia law. Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Enter. Leasing Co., 79 Va. Cir. 382, 2009 Va. Cir. LEXIS 133 (Fairfax County Oct. 14, 2009), aff'd, 281 Va. 612 , 708 S.E.2d 852, 2011 Va. LEXIS 89 (2011).
§ 38.2-201. Recommendations by Commission to General Assembly.
The Commission shall make any recommendations to the General Assembly necessary for legislation governing and regulating the classes of companies placed under its supervision by this title.
History. Code 1950, § 38-128; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-30; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-202. Regulation of solicitation of proxies, consents and authorizations.
The Commission may adopt any rules and regulations regarding the voting equity securities of any domestic stock insurer. These rules and regulations shall cover (i) the solicitation of proxies, (ii) consents, (iii) authorizations, and (iv) any related financial reports. However, these rules and regulations shall not apply to any domestic stock insurer whose equity securities are registered, or required to be registered, pursuant to § 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
History. 1966, c. 262, § 38.1-30.1; 1986, c. 562.
Editor’s note.
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to above, is codified as 15 U.S.C.S. § 78l.
§ 38.2-203. Management and exclusive agency contracts subject to approval by Commission.
- For the purpose of this section, an insurer shall mean a stock or mutual insurer, cooperative nonprofit life benefit company, mutual assessment life, accident and sickness insurer, burial society, fraternal benefit society, mutual assessment property and casualty insurer, home protection company, health maintenance organization, premium finance company or a person licensed under Chapter 42 (§ 38.2-4200 et seq.), 44 (§ 38.2-4400 et seq.) or 45 (§ 38.2-4500 et seq.) of this title, incorporated or organized under the laws of this Commonwealth.
- No insurer shall make or enter into any contract that provides for the control and management of the insurer, or the controlling or preemptive right to produce substantially all insurance business for the insurer, unless the contract has been filed with and approved by the Commission and approval has not been withdrawn by the Commission. Any approval, disapproval, or withdrawal of approval shall be delivered to the insurer in writing. The notice of disapproval or withdrawal of approval shall state the grounds of such action and shall be delivered to the insurer at least fifteen days before the effective date.
-
The Commission may disapprove or withdraw approval of any contract referred to in this section that:
- Subjects the insurer to excessive charges for expenses or commissions;
- Does not contain fair and adequate standards of performance;
- Extends for an unreasonable length of time; or
- Contains other inequitable provisions or provisions that may jeopardize the security of policyholders.
- The provisions of this section shall not affect contracts made before June 30, 1954, but shall apply to all renewals of those contracts made after that date.
- Any insurer aggrieved by a disapproval or withdrawal of approval under this section may proceed under the provisions of § 38.2-222 .
History. 1954, c. 363, § 38.1-29.1; 1986, c. 562; 1998, c. 42.
The 1998 amendment, in subsection A, substituted “casualty insurer” for “casualty insurers,” deleted “legal services plan or” preceding “home protection company” and inserted “health maintenance organization, premium finance company or a person licensed under Chapter 42 (§ 38.2-4200 et seq.), 44 (§ 38.2-4400 et seq.) or 45 (§ 38.2-4500 et seq.) of this title” following “home protection company.”
§§ 38.2-204, 38.2-205. Repealed by Acts 1991, c. 620.
§ 38.2-205.1. Temporary contracts of insurance permitted.
A lender engaged in making or servicing real estate mortgage or deed of trust loans on one to four family residences shall accept as evidence of insurance a temporary written contract of insurance meeting the requirements of § 38.2-2112 and issued by any duly licensed agent, broker, or insurance company. Nothing herein prohibits the lender from disapproving such insurer provided such disapproval is reasonable. Such lender need not accept a binder unless such binder (i) includes the name and address of the insured, name and address of the mortgagee, a description of the insured collateral, and a provision that it may not be cancelled within the term of the binder except upon ten days’ written notice to the mortgagee; (ii) is accompanied by a paid receipt for one year’s premium, except in the case of the renewal of a policy subsequent to the closing of a loan; and (iii) includes an undertaking of agent to use his best efforts to have the company issue a policy within forty-five days, unless the binder is cancelled. The Bureau of Insurance may by administrative letter require binders to contain such additional information as may be necessary to permit such binders to comply with the reasonable requirements of the Federal National Mortgage Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for purchase of mortgage loans.
History. 1987, c. 10.
§ 38.2-206. Corporations as members of mutual insurers.
Any public or private corporation in this Commonwealth or elsewhere may apply and enter into agreements for, hold policies in, and be a member of any mutual insurer.
History. Code 1950, § 38-506; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-31.1; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-207. Enforcement of right of subrogation in name of insured.
Except for contracts or plans subject to § 38.2-3405 or § 38.2-2209 , when any insurer pays an insured under a contract of insurance which provides that the insurer becomes subrogated to the rights of the insured against any other party the insurer may enforce the legal liability of the other party. This action may be brought in its own name or in the name of the insured or the insured’s personal representative.
History. 1952, c. 476, § 38.1-31.2; 1973, c. 28; 1986, c. 562.
Research References.
Bryson on Virginia Civil Procedure (Matthew Bender). Chapter 5 Parties. § 5.02 Competency. Bryson.
Virginia Forms (Matthew Bender). No. 13-104 Subrogation Agreement.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 58.
CASE NOTES
When loss occurs. —
While an insurer cannot enforce subrogation rights until after it has made payment under a policy, loss does not occur only after payment by the insurer to the insured or by the insured to a third party whose claim might be covered under the policy. In the context of a policy provision that “the insured shall do nothing after loss to affect such rights” loss occurs when an insured risk causes damage. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Abiouness, 227 Va. 10 , 313 S.E.2d 663, 1984 Va. LEXIS 261 (1984).
If construction defects existed and caused damage before a release agreement between insured and a subcontractor was signed, and if the agreement released a person or entity allegedly responsible for the damage, then the subrogation rights of the insurers would have been prejudiced and insured would be barred from recovery by a policy provision that the insured not injure the insurer’s subrogation rights. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Abiouness, 227 Va. 10 , 313 S.E.2d 663, 1984 Va. LEXIS 261 (1984).
Where the assured has an uncompensated claim for its deductible under the insurance policy the assured is a real party in interest which may properly seek enforcement of its claim for the uncompensated deductible. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Hutcherson, 50 Bankr. 845, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5918 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1985).
Subrogation to insured’s claim against employee for embezzlement was nondischargeable in bankruptcy. —
The creditor’s insurer, as subrogee to the creditor (the debtor’s employer), was substituted to the rights of the creditor to whom it succeeded in relation to the debt arising out of debtor’s embezzlement of his employer’s funds. Nothing in the Bankruptcy Code would prevent the insurer, as subrogee, from filing a proof of claim or asserting a nondischargeability complaint. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Hutcherson, 50 Bankr. 845, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5918 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1985).
Subrogation under Virginia Consumer Protection Act. —
An insurance company has a right to subrogation under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act. Gill v. Rollins Protective Servs. Co., 773 F.2d 592, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23318 (4th Cir. 1985), amended, 788 F.2d 1042, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 37434 (4th Cir. 1986).
Unclean hands not relevant. —
Defendant subsidiary’s unclean hands defense failed; the general business conduct of the subrogee was irrelevant to whether the subrogee could recover for the insured loss suffered by the subrogor commercial greenhouse. Florists' Mut. Ins. v. Ludvig Svensson, Inc., No. 3:01CV00095, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5925 (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2003).
Subrogation against a surety and surety bond. —
Although a title insurer had no standing in its own right to maintain a common-law breach of contract action against a surety and surety bond issued under the Virginia Consumer Real Estate Settlement Protection Act, based on language contained within the title insurance policy it issued, the title insurer it could maintain the action as the subrogee of its insured. First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. Western Sur. Co., 491 Fed. Appx. 371, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16751 (4th Cir. 2012).
Subrogation against tenant. —
Condominium association’s insurance provider did not waive subrogation against the tenant of an individual unit owner when the tenant was not a named or additional insured under an insurance policy covering the association and the individual unit owners because the provider did not waive subrogation in regard to anyone other than the association and the individual unit owners. The tenant, as neither an individual unit owner, nor part of the association, was not protected by any waiver the provider may have made as to subrogation. Erie Ins. Exch. v. Alba, 298 Va. 673 , 842 S.E.2d 195, 2020 Va. LEXIS 53 (2020).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Insurance company’s right to bring claim in insured’s name. —
Trial court granted the insurance company’s motion to prohibit, during trial, any mention of the insurance company’s involvement in the case or its compensation to the insured due to the tenant’s allegedly negligent act that set the insured’s apartment on fire; the insurance company had the statutory right to bring its case in the name of the insured. LeChow v. Reese, 63 Va. Cir. 110, 2003 Va. Cir. LEXIS 167 (Arlington County Sept. 10, 2003).
Landlord’s insurer had right to proceed against tenants who started a fire. —
Landlord waived any rights it had under the lease against its tenants for starting a fire in the leased apartment by returning the tenants’ security deposit. However, the landlord did not waive its negligence claim against the tenants, which arose independently of the lease, and therefore the landlord’s insurer could proceed in subrogation against the tenants on the negligence claim. Cincinnati Ins. Cos. v. Farrington, 81 Va. Cir. 345, 2010 Va. Cir. LEXIS 292 (Charlottesville Nov. 16, 2010).
CASE NOTES
Subrogation action by title insurance companies. —
Title insurance companies were subrogees and could only bring breach of fiduciary duty claims, at that time, against their settlement agents as to properties in settlement transactions for which they had made payments. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. Wash. Settlement Group, LLC, 87 Va. Cir. 77, 2013 Va. Cir. LEXIS 136 (Fairfax County Sept. 4, 2013).
§ 38.2-208. Limitation of risks generally.
- Except as otherwise provided in this title, no insurer transacting business in this Commonwealth shall expose itself to any loss on any one risk or hazard in an amount exceeding ten percent of its surplus to policyholders. Any risk or portion of any risk reinsured by an insurer meeting standards of solvency equal to those set forth in Article 3.1 (§ 38.2-1316.1 et seq.) of Chapter 13 shall be deducted in determining the limitation of risk prescribed in this section.
- For the purpose of this section, the surplus to policyholders shall be determined from (i) the insurer’s last sworn statement filed with the Commission or (ii) the Commission’s last report of examination, whichever is more recent at the time the risk is assumed.
- For the purpose of this section, any one risk or hazard (i) in the case of municipal bond insurance shall mean average annual debt service of insured obligations backed by a single revenue source, provided that the insurance policy does not require any accelerated payment of principal by the insurer upon the event of default and (ii) in the case of all other kinds of financial guaranty insurance shall mean the insured unpaid principal with respect to obligations for any one entity, except that any risk or hazard shall be defined by revenue source, if the insured risk or hazard is payable from a specified revenue source or adequately secured by loan obligations or other assets.
- As used in subsection C above:“Municipal bond insurance” means a kind of financial guaranty insurance providing insurance against loss by reason of nonpayment of principal, interest or other payment obligations pursuant to the terms of municipal bonds.“Municipal bond” means any security, or other instrument under which a payment obligation is created, issued by or on behalf of, or payable or guaranteed by, the United States, Canada, a state, a province of Canada, a municipality or political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or any public agency or instrumentality thereof, or by any other entity provided that such security is eligible for issuance by one of the foregoing.“Average annual debt service” means the amount of insured unpaid principal and interest on an obligation multiplied by the number of such insured obligations, assuming that each obligation represents a $1,000 par value, divided by the amount equal to the aggregate life of all such obligations.“Financial guaranty insurance” means insurance against loss by reason of the failure of any obligor on any debt instrument or other monetary obligation, including common or preferred stock or capital leases, to pay when due principal, interest, premium, dividend, or purchase price of or on such instrument or obligation, or a fee in connection therewith, when such failure is the result of a financial default or insolvency, regardless of whether such obligation is incurred directly or as a guarantor by or on behalf of another obligor that has also defaulted.For the purposes of subsection C of this section, the amount of insured unpaid principal shall be reduced by the amount of deposit of (i) cash, or (ii) the market value of obligations rated in the four highest major rating categories by a securities rating agency recognized by the Commission, or (iii) the stated amount of an unconditional, irrevocable letter of credit issued or confirmed by a bank or trust company that (a) is a member of the federal reserve system or chartered by any state or (b) is organized and existing under the laws of a foreign country, has been licensed as a branch or agency by any state or the federal government and is rated in the two highest major rating categories by a securities ratings agency recognized by the Commission or (c) is otherwise acceptable to the Commission or (iv) a conveyance or mortgage of real property, or (v) the scheduled cash flow from obligations rated in the four highest major rating categories by a securities rating agency recognized by the Commission if scheduled to be received on or prior to the date of scheduled debt service on the insured obligations. Such deposit shall be held by the insurer or held in trust for the benefit of the insurer or held in trust for the benefit of holders of the insured obligation whether in the form of debt service, sinking funds or other reserves pursuant to the bond indenture by a trustee acceptable to the Commission.For the purpose of subsection C of this section, an insurer’s surplus to policyholders shall include the amount of any contingency or similar reserve established and maintained by the insurer pursuant to applicable law for the protection of insureds covered by financial guaranty insurance policies against the effect of excessive losses usually occurring during adverse economic cycles.
- The limitation of risk prescribed in this section for any alien insurer shall apply only to the exposure to risk and the trusteed surplus of the alien insurer’s policyholders.
- This section shall not apply to (i) life insurance, (ii) annuities, (iii) accident and sickness insurance, (iv) insurance of marine risks or marine protection and indemnity risks, (v) workers’ compensation or employers’ liability risks, or (vi) risks covered by title insurance.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-167, 38-168; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-32; 1986, c. 562; 1987, c. 353; 1988, c. 554.
Cross references.
As to compliance with this section by reciprocal insurers, see § 38.2-1203 .
§ 38.2-209. Award of insured’s attorney fees in certain cases.
- Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, in any civil case in which an insured individual sues his insurer to determine what coverage, if any, exists under his present policy or fidelity bond or the extent to which his insurer is liable for compensating a covered loss, the individual insured shall be entitled to recover from the insurer costs and such reasonable attorney fees as the court may award. However, these costs and attorney’s fees shall not be awarded unless the court determines that the insurer, not acting in good faith, has either denied coverage or failed or refused to make payment to the insured under the policy. “Individual,” as used in this section, shall mean and include any person, group, business, company, organization, receiver, trustee, security, corporation, partnership, association, or governmental body, and this definition is declaratory of existing policy.
- Nothing in this section shall be deemed to grant a right to bring an action against an insurer by an insured who would otherwise lack standing to bring an action.
- As used in this section, “insurer” shall include “self-insurer.”
History. 1982, c. 576, § 38.1-32.1; 1986, c. 562; 2006, c. 279.
The 2006 amendments.
The 2006 amendment by c. 279 substituted “fidelity bond” for “bond” in the first sentence in subsection A.
Law Review.
For an article relating to recent case decisions and statutory changes in the field of insurance law, see 32 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1303 (1998).
For article, “Insurance Law,” see 35 U. Rich. L. Rev. 697 (2001).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, §§ 4, 68.
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
Statute is both punitive and remedial in nature; it is designed to punish insurer guilty of bad faith in denying coverage or withholding payment and to reimburse insured who has been compelled by insurer’s bad-faith conduct to incur expense of litigation. CUNA Mut. Ins. Soc'y v. Norman, 237 Va. 33 , 375 S.E.2d 724, 5 Va. Law Rep. 1375, 1989 Va. LEXIS 22 (1989) (decided under former § 38.1-32.1).
Construction. —
General Assembly enacted the Virginia Commission’s recommendations with few amendments, and no amendments to the recommended language now codified as the statute; therefore, the supreme court accepts the report as persuasive authority that the General Assembly did not intend to make a substantive change in the statute. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
This section does not create cause of action, but merely permits the award of attorney fees where a private cause of action already exists. Salomon v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 801 F.2d 659, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30863 (4th Cir. 1986).
Claim under this section may not be brought as a separate cause of action, but only as a source of recovery of costs and attorney’s fees once a judgment is entered against the insurer. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Plaintiff seeking attorney’s fees based on common law principles can alternatively seek them under this section. Atlantic Permanent Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. American Cas. Co., 670 F. Supp. 168, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18909 (E.D. Va. 1986).
Bad faith. —
In order to recover attorney’s fees and costs under this section, a plaintiff must establish that the insurer acted in bad faith by denying coverage or refusing to make payment under the policy. Joseph P. Bornstein, Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 828 F.2d 242, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12187 (4th Cir. 1987).
An insured may be awarded attorney’s fees generated in a suit against its insurer for a determination of coverage under the policy if it shows that the insurer, not acting in good faith, denied coverage or failed or refused to make payment to the insured under the policy, or an insured may seek the imposition of penalties for insurer’s violations of the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. UTF Carriers, Inc., 790 F. Supp. 637, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5941 (W.D. Va. 1992), dismissed, No. 89-0038-C, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16341 (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1992).
Where an insured failed to show evidence from which a jury could conclude that an insurer acted in bad faith in denying the insured coverage, the insurer was entitled to partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim. HHC Assocs. v. Assurance Co. of Am., 256 F. Supp. 2d 505, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6539 (E.D. Va. 2003).
Fact than an insurer was unlicensed at the time that it refused to defend an insured did not entitle the insured to a prima facie presumption that the insurer’s failure to make payments in an underlying lawsuit was vexatious and without reasonable cause under subsection B of § 38.2-807 for purposes of obtaining attorney’s fees for a bad faith failure to defend under § 38.2-209 because subsection B of § 38.2-807 and the presumption applied to situations where an unlicensed insurer failed to defend in an action brought by an insured upon an insurance contract, and the insurer was properly defending itself in the lawsuit. Structural Concrete Prods., LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., No. 3:07CV253, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61714 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2007).
Final judgment against an insurer was not a prerequisite to a suit by an insured under § 38.2-209 to recover attorney’s fees for the insurer’s alleged bad faith failure to defend. Structural Concrete Prods., LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., No. 3:07CV253, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61714 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2007).
There was nothing in the record to indicate that the insurer’s denial of the insured’s claim was made in bad faith; while its reliance on the contract and professional services exclusions were ultimately incorrect, the insurer’s interpretation of the policy was not so unreasonable as to demonstrate bad faith. The coverage questions raised by the facts of the case were by no means obvious based on settled law, and thus the insurer’s denial of coverage was reasonable. Capitol Envtl. Servs. v. N. River Ins. Co., 536 F. Supp. 2d 633, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15653 (E.D. Va. 2008).
Subsection A did not create an independent cause of action for an insurer’s bad faith breach of an insurance contract, and thus, it was not a cause of action separate from an insured’s claim for breach of contract. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
Bad faith analysis. —
In evaluating conduct of insurer, courts should apply reasonableness standard; bad-faith analysis generally would require consideration of such questions as whether reasonable minds could differ in interpretation of policy provisions defining coverage and exclusions; whether insurer had made reasonable investigation of facts and circumstances underlying insured’s claim; whether evidence discovered reasonably supports denial of liability; whether it appears that insurer’s refusal to pay was used merely as tool in settlement negotiations; and whether defense insurer asserts at trial raises issue of first impression or reasonably debatable question of law or fact. CUNA Mut. Ins. Soc'y v. Norman, 237 Va. 33 , 375 S.E.2d 724, 5 Va. Law Rep. 1375, 1989 Va. LEXIS 22 (1989) (decided under former § 38.1-32.1).
“Court,” as used in subsection A, means “judge,” and accordingly, the judge, not the jury, must determine whether the insurer breached the insurance contract in bad faith before it may award attorney’s fees and costs to the insured; a judge, not a jury, must determine whether an insurer has either denied coverage or failed or refused to make payment to the insured under the policy in bad faith. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
Reliance on reasonable interpretation of policy. —
Insurer should not be subjected to tort liability or to liability for insured’s costs and fees simply because it refused to defend insured in reliance on its reasonable interpretation of the insurance policy. Joseph P. Bornstein, Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 828 F.2d 242, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12187 (4th Cir. 1987).
Claim for costs and fees was not considered in determining the amount in controversy for purposes of federal court jurisdiction. —
Estate executor’s claim for costs and attorney’s fees under subsection A of § 38.2-209 against an insurer was not considered in determining the amount in controversy where the executor could only recover those costs after a judgment had been entered against the insurer, the executor was required to make an additional showing of bad faith to recover the mandated fees, under Virginia court precedent, the court could not consider the question of the insurer’s bad faith, nor could the executor properly plead bad faith, until a judgment had been entered against the insurer, and as a result, the executor’s claim could not include any amount of attorney’s fees under Virginia law. Cradle v. Monumental Life Ins. Co., 354 F. Supp. 2d 632, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12916 (E.D. Va. 2005).
Fees request should be made in complaint. —
Plain language of the statute makes clear that fee request be brought within the same suit as the substantive claim; a request for fees or costs is not set out in a subsequent separate civil action but in the same matter from which it arises. Such a request must be made in the complaint, although it is not considered until the denouement of the case. Styles v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., No. 7:06CV00311, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49294 (W.D. Va. July 7, 2006).
Jury trial. —
Insured had no right to a jury trial on the issue of bad faith or an award of attorney’s fees and costs because Va. Const. art. I, § 11 did not apply to proceedings under the statute; subsection A does not implicate the right to a jury trial under Va. Const. art. I, § 11. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
Insufficient evidence for awarding of attorney fees. —
Where plaintiff presented no evidence that defendant acted in bad faith and where defendant’s refusal to pay was substantially justified in that the legal and factual issues were unsettled, plaintiff may not recover attorney fees. Rush v. Hartford Mut. Ins. Co., 652 F. Supp. 1432, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 962 (W.D. Va. 1987).
No evidence of record was found to support trial judge’s conclusion that insurer had not acted in good faith where testimonial and documentary evidence insurer adduced at trial showed that insurer had made thorough investigation of facts and circumstances underlying plaintiff ’s claim where determination of issue turned upon construction of word “livelihood,” where issue was matter of first impression in jurisdiction. CUNA Mut. Ins. Soc'y v. Norman, 237 Va. 33 , 375 S.E.2d 724, 5 Va. Law Rep. 1375, 1989 Va. LEXIS 22 (1989) (decided under former § 38.1-32.1).
Insured’s bad faith claim failed on the merits; there was nothing in the record to suggest that the insurer’s denial of the insureds’ claim was made in bad faith and while the insurer’s asserted defenses of scrivener’s error and mutual mistake were rejected, the insurer’s position was not so unreasonable as to demonstrate bad faith. The coverage questions raised were by no means settled under Virginia law, therefore, there was an insufficient basis to award costs and attorney’s fees. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Attorney fees and costs. —
Section authorizes the court to award attorney’s fees and costs after the insured establishes coverage under the disputed policy, and the court finds that the insurer denied coverage in bad faith; it is a vehicle for shifting attorney’s fees and costs where otherwise such costs would not be recoverable. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
Attorney fees denied. —
Allegedly the law firm was named as a defendant in over 500 lawsuits and failed to inform the insurer in its application before the insurer issued professional liability insurance; the insurer’s albeit short investigation reasonably supported its decision to seek rescission, and coupled with the fact that the insurer provided a defense under a reservation of rights, indicated that the insurer did act in good faith. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Draper & Goldberg, PLLC, 369 F. Supp. 2d 667, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27860 (E.D. Va. 2004).
Punitive damages not authorized. —
The Virginia legislature has provided for punishment and deterrence without authorizing punitive damages against errant insurance companies. Bettius & Sanderson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 839 F.2d 1009, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2131 (4th Cir. 1988).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Bad faith analysis. —
Because there was no judgment yet, the airline could not present any evidence that would merit a finding of bad faith on the part of the insurance company. US Airways, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ins. Co., 64 Va. Cir. 408, 2004 Va. Cir. LEXIS 95 (Arlington County May 14, 2004), rev'd, 271 Va. 352 , 626 S.E.2d 369, 2006 Va. LEXIS 28 (2006). But see Styles v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., No. 7:06CV00311, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49294 (W.D. Va. July 7, 2006).
Homeowners who succeeded in obtaining a judgment by confession from an insurer who defaulted on their complaint alleging breach of contract and other matters in regard to the insurer’s failure to pay more than the policy limits after their home was destroyed by fire were not entitled to attorney fees under either the Virginia Consumer Protection Act or this section because the insurer did not act in bad faith or commit fraud by paying just the policy limits, even though the homeowners were ultimately awarded a damage judgment against the insurer. Le Morzellec v. Loudoun Mut. Ins. Co., 2004 Va. Cir. LEXIS 218 (Fairfax County July 26, 2004).
Bifurcation of breach of contract claim from attorney’s fees claim. —
Insurer was entitled to bifurcate trial on an insured’s request for attorney’s fees from the insured’s breach of contract claim, which was based on its failure to provide coverage for a fire on the insured’s premises, because a bad faith claim for fees was not ripe until a judgment was entered against the insurer. Wilson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 79 Va. Cir. 591, 2009 Va. Cir. LEXIS 143 (Roanoke Dec. 14, 2009).
Insufficient facts to invoke remedy. —
Complaint failed to allege facts sufficient to invoke the remedy provided by this section for an insurer’s denial of coverage or failure to make payment under a policy, because a judgment was not rendered against the uninsured motorist and the insurer had no pretrial duty to evaluate, adjust, and settle the claim in good faith. Manu v. GEICO Cas., 93 Va. Cir. 59, 2016 Va. Cir. LEXIS 46 (Fairfax County Mar. 11, 2016), aff'd, 293 Va. 371 , 798 S.E.2d 598, 2017 Va. LEXIS 73 (2017).
§ 38.2-210. Loans to officers, directors, etc., prohibited.
- Except as provided in § 38.2-212 , no insurer, legal services plan, health services plan, dental or optometric services plan, health maintenance organization, or home protection company, transacting business in this Commonwealth shall make a loan, either directly or indirectly, to any of its officers or directors. No such company shall make a loan to any other corporation or business unit in which any of its officers or directors has a substantial interest. No such officer or director shall accept or receive any such loan directly or indirectly.
- For the purposes of this section and of § 38.2-211 , “a substantial interest” in any corporation or business unit means an interest equivalent to ownership or control of at least ten percent of its stock or its equivalent by an officer or director, or the aggregate ownership or control by all officers and directors of the same company.
History. Code 1950, § 38-4.1; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-33; 1978, c. 701; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-211. Other interests and payments to officers, directors, etc., prohibited.
Except as provided in § 38.2-212 , no officer or director of any company listed in § 38.2-210 and transacting business in this Commonwealth shall receive, directly, indirectly or through any substantial interest in any other corporation, any compensation for negotiating, procuring, recommending, or aiding in the purchase or sale of property by such company, or in obtaining any loan from the company. No such officer or director shall be pecuniarily interested, either as principal, agent, or beneficiary, in any such purchase, sale or loan. No financial obligation of any such officer or director shall be guaranteed by the company.
History. Code 1950, § 38-4.2; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-34; 1978, c. 701; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-212. Certain compensation not prohibited.
- Nothing contained in §§ 38.2-210 and 38.2-211 shall prohibit any officer or director of any company listed in § 38.2-210 from receiving usual compensation for services rendered in the ordinary course of his duties as an officer or director, if the compensation is authorized by vote of the board of directors or other governing body of the company. Nor shall the provisions of §§ 38.2-210 and 38.2-211 prohibit the payment to an officer or director of any such company who is a licensed attorney-at-law of a fee in connection with loans made by the company if and when those fees are paid by the borrower and do not constitute a charge against the company.
- Nothing contained in this chapter shall prohibit a life insurer from making a loan upon a policy of insurance issued by it and held by the borrower. This loan shall not exceed the net cash value of the policy. Nothing contained in this chapter shall prohibit any company from (i) making a loan on real property owned by the officer and improved with a dwelling that is to serve as his residence if the loan qualifies under subdivision 1 of § 38.2-1434 and under § 38.2-1437 or (ii) acquiring the residence of the officer in conformance with subsection D of § 38.2-1441 if the transaction is in connection with the relocation of the place of employment of an officer who is neither a director nor a trustee of the company.
- Nothing contained in § 38.2-211 shall prohibit a director of any such company from receiving compensation that is usual and customary in the director’s business with respect to transactions in the ordinary course of business of the company and of the director. Prior to payment of the compensation, written request for the Commission’s approval shall be made. This written request shall set forth under oath complete details concerning the transactions that the company intends to conduct with a director. Any approval given by the Commission shall be in writing. No approval granted under this subsection shall imply that the Commission approves any investment of any company.
History. Code 1950, § 38-4.3; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-35; 1977, c. 261; 1978, c. 701; 1981, c. 272; 1983, c. 457; 1986, c. 562; 1992, c. 588.
§ 38.2-213. Violation of § 38.2-210 or § 38.2-211.
Any company, officer or director violating any provision of § 38.2-210 or § 38.2-211 shall be guilty upon conviction of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any funds of any company invested or used in violation of either of § 38.2-210 or § 38.2-211 may not be reported as an admitted asset in accordance with guidance set forth in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners accounting practices and procedures manuals.
History. Code 1950, § 38-4.4; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-36; 1986, c. 562; 2000, c. 46.
Cross references.
As to punishment for Class 1 misdemeanors, see § 18.2-11 .
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 46, effective January 1, 2001, substituted “may not be reported as an admitted asset in accordance with guidance set forth in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners accounting practices and procedures manuals” for “may not be allowed as admitted assets of the company” at the end of the second sentence.
§ 38.2-214. Restrictions upon purchase and sale of equity securities of domestic stock insurers.
- Each person who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than ten percent of a class of any equity security of a domestic insurer, or who is a director or an officer of a domestic stock insurer, shall file a statement with the Commission within ten days after becoming a beneficial owner, director or officer. This statement shall be in a form prescribed by the Commission and shall show the amount of all the domestic insurer’s equity securities of which he is the beneficial owner. Within ten days after the close of each calendar month, if there has been a change in his ownership during such month, the person shall file with the Commission a statement prescribed by the Commission indicating his ownership at the close of the calendar month and such changes in his ownership as have occurred during such calendar month.
- To prevent the unfair use of information obtained by any beneficial owner, director or officer, any profit realized by such person within six months from the purchase and sale, or any sale and purchase, of any of the insurer’s equity securities shall inure to and be recoverable by the insurer. This provision shall apply regardless of any intention of the beneficial owner, director or officer to hold the equity security purchased or not to repurchase any sold equity security for a period exceeding six months. However, this provision shall not apply if the security was acquired in good faith in connection with a debt previously contracted. The insurer may sue at law or in equity to recover the profit in any court of competent jurisdiction. The owner of any equity security of the insurer may sue in the name and in behalf of the insurer if the insurer fails or refuses to bring suit within sixty days after request or if the insurer fails to diligently prosecute after bringing suit. No suit under this subsection shall be brought more than two years after the date the profit was realized. This subsection shall not be construed to cover any transaction where the person was not the beneficial owner at the time of either the purchase or sale of the equity security involved. The Commission may by rules and regulations exempt from the provisions of this subsection any transaction that is not comprehended within the purpose of this subsection.
- No beneficial owner, director or officer shall directly or indirectly sell any equity security of the insurer if the person selling the security or his principal (i) does not own the security sold, or (ii) owns the equity security but does not deliver it within twenty days after the sale or does not mail it within five days after the sale. No person shall be deemed to have violated this subsection if he proves that, notwithstanding the exercise of good faith, he was unable to deliver or mail the security within the required time, or that to do so would cause undue inconvenience or expense. Any person violating this subsection shall be guilty upon conviction of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
- Subsections B and C of this section shall not apply to the transactions of a dealer in an investment account that are conducted in the ordinary course of a dealer’s business and incident to the establishment or maintenance of an equity security’s primary or secondary market, other than on an exchange defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Commission may, by rules and regulations, define and prescribe terms and conditions with respect to equity securities held in an investment account and transactions made in the ordinary course of business and incident to the establishment or maintenance of a primary or secondary market.
- Subsections A, B, and C of this section shall not apply to foreign or domestic arbitrage transactions unless made in contravention of rules and regulations adopted by the Commission to carry out the purposes of this section.
- The term “equity security” when used in this section means (i) any stock or similar security, (ii) any security that is convertible, with or without consideration, into another security, (iii) any security that carries any warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase a security, or (iv) any warrant, right or other security that the Commission, by rules and regulations, deems to be similar in nature to an equity security and considers the classification necessary or appropriate for protecting the public or an investor’s interest.
- Subsections A, B, and C of this section shall not apply to equity securities of a domestic stock insurer if (i) those equity securities are registered or are required to be registered pursuant to § 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or (ii) the domestic stock insurer does not have any class of its equity securities held of record by 100 or more persons on the last business day of the year immediately preceding the year in which equity securities of the insurer would be subject to subsections A, B, and C of this section.
- The Commission may adopt rules and regulations pursuant to § 38.2-223 for the execution of the functions vested in it by subsections A through G of this section. The Commission may classify for that purpose any domestic stock insurers, equity securities, and other persons or matters within its jurisdiction. The Commission may exempt from the provisions of this section any officer, director or beneficial owner of equity securities of any domestic stock insurer under the terms and conditions, and for the period of time the Commission considers necessary or appropriate if the Commission finds that the action is consistent with the public interest or the protection of investors. Any such exemption may be accomplished by (i) rules and regulations issued pursuant to § 38.2-223 or (ii) by order, upon application of any interested person, after due notice and an opportunity for hearing has been given. No provision of subsections A, B, and C of this section imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any rule or regulation of the Commission. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, such rule or regulation may be amended, rescinded or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason after the act or omission has occurred.
History. 1966, c. 265, § 38.1-36.1; 1986, c. 562.
Cross references.
As to punishment for Class 1 misdemeanors, see § 18.2-11 .
Editor’s note.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to above, is codified as 15 U.S.C.S. § 78a et seq.
§ 38.2-215. Liability of president, chief executive officer or directors if insurance issued when insurer insolvent.
If any insurer is insolvent, and the president, chief executive officer or directors with knowledge of insolvency make or agree to further insurance, they shall be personally liable for any loss under that insurance.
History. Code 1950, § 38-176; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-37; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-216. Restrictions on removal or transfer of property and on reinsurance; penalty.
- No domestic insurer shall remove from this Commonwealth either all or substantially all of its property or business without the written approval of the Commission.
- No domestic insurer shall transfer or attempt to transfer substantially its entire property, or enter into any transaction the effect of which is to merge substantially its entire property or business into the property or business of any other company, without prior written approval of the Commission.
- No domestic insurer shall reinsure with any other insurer all or substantially all of its risks without prior written approval of the Commission of the reinsurance and of the contract under which reinsurance is effected.
- No domestic insurer shall enter into or modify a reinsurance treaty or risk-sharing arrangement without prior written approval of the Commission if for any twelve-month period the reinsurance premium or anticipated change in the ceding insurer’s liabilities equals or exceeds fifty percent of the insurer’s surplus to policyholders as of the immediately preceding December 31.
- Any director or officer of the insurer consenting to and participating in any violation of this section shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
History. Code 1950, § 38-6; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-38; 1986, c. 562; 2000, c. 51.
Cross references.
As to punishment for Class 1 misdemeanors, see § 18.2-11 .
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 51 added present subsection D, and redesignated former subsection D as present subsection E.
§ 38.2-217. When assets may not be distributed among stockholders.
No domestic insurer shall distribute its assets among its stockholders until all risks have expired or have been cancelled, or have been replaced by the policies of another solvent insurer licensed to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth, and until all claims against the insurer have been settled. No insurer shall contract to reinsure its risks for the purpose of distributing its assets without first obtaining the written approval of the Commission. However, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the lawful payment of dividends.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-170, 38-171; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-39; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-218. Penalties and restitution payments.
- Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of this title or any regulation issued pursuant to this title shall be punished for each violation by a penalty of not more than $5,000.
- Any person who violates without knowledge or intent any provision of this title or any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to this title may be punished for each violation by a penalty of not more than $1,000. For the purpose of this subsection, a series of similar violations resulting from the same act shall be limited to a penalty in the aggregate of not more than $10,000.
- Any violation resulting solely from a malfunction of mechanical or electronic equipment shall not be subject to a penalty.
-
-
The Commission may require a person to make restitution in the amount of the direct actual financial loss: D. 1. The Commission may require a person to make restitution in the amount of the direct actual financial loss:
- For charging a rate in excess of that provided by statute or by the rates filed with the Commission by the insurer;
- For charging a premium that is determined by the Commission to be unfairly discriminatory, such restitution being limited to a period of one year from the date of determination;
- For failing to pay amounts explicitly required by the terms of the insurance contract where no aspect of the claim is disputed by the insurer; and
- For improperly withholding, misappropriating, or converting any money or property received in the course of doing business.
- The Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate controversies growing out of this subsection regarding restitution among insurers, insureds, agents, claimants and beneficiaries.
-
The Commission may require a person to make restitution in the amount of the direct actual financial loss: D. 1. The Commission may require a person to make restitution in the amount of the direct actual financial loss:
- The provisions provided under this section may be imposed in addition to or without imposing any other penalties or actions provided by law.
History. Code 1950, § 38-24; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-40; 1986, c. 562; 2010, c. 226.
Cross references.
As to suspension, revocation, or termination of license of limited lines travel insurance agent or travel retailer, see § 38.2-1888.1 .
As to penalties related to registration of continuing care providers, see § 38.2-4932 .
The 2010 amendments.
The 2010 amendments by c. 226 added subdivision D 1 d and made minor stylistic changes.
CASE NOTES
An insured may be awarded attorney’s fees generated in a suit against its insurer for a determination of coverage under the policy if it shows that the insurer, not acting in good faith, denied coverage or failed or refused to make payment to the insured under the policy, or an insured may seek the imposition of penalties for insurer’s violations of the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. UTF Carriers, Inc., 790 F. Supp. 637, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5941 (W.D. Va. 1992), dismissed, No. 89-0038-C, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16341 (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1992).
§ 38.2-219. Violations; procedure; cease and desist orders.
- Whenever the Commission has reason to believe that any person has committed a violation of this title or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission under this title, it shall issue and serve an order upon that person by certified or registered mail or in any other manner permitted by law. The order shall include a statement of the charges and a notice of a hearing on the charges to be held at a fixed time and place which shall be at least ten days after the date of service of the notice. The order shall require that person to show cause why an order should not be made by the Commission directing the alleged offender to cease and desist from the violation or to show cause why the Commission should not issue any other appropriate order as the nature of the case and the interests of the policyholders, creditors, shareholders, or the public may require. At the hearing, that person shall have an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the Commission’s order. In all matters in connection with the charges or hearing, the Commission shall have the jurisdiction, power and authority granted or conferred upon it by Title 12.1 and, except as otherwise provided in this title, the procedure shall conform to and the right of appeal shall be the same as that provided in Title 12.1.
- If the Commission finds in the hearing that there is about to be or has been a violation of this title, it may issue and serve upon any person committing the violation by certified or registered mail or in any other manner permitted by law (i) an order reciting its findings and directing the person to cease and desist from the violation or (ii) such other appropriate order as the nature of the case and the interests of the policyholders, creditors, shareholders, or the public requires.
-
Any person who violates any order issued under subsection B of this section may upon conviction be subject to one or both of the following:
- Punishment as provided in § 38.2-218 ; or
- The suspension or revocation of any license issued by the Commission.
History. 1952, c. 317, §§ 38.1-54, 38.1-55, 38.1-60 through 38.1-62; 1971, Ex. Sess., c. 1; 1973, c. 505, § 38.1-178.7; 1977, c. 414, § 38.1-178.17; 1977, c. 529; 1980, c. 404; 1982, c. 223, § 38.1-482.14:1; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 13A M.J. Monopolies and Restraints of Trade, § 8.
§ 38.2-220. Injunctions.
The Commission shall have the jurisdiction and powers of a court of equity to issue temporary and permanent injunctions restraining acts which violate or attempt to violate provisions of this title and to enforce the injunctions by civil penalty or imprisonment.
History. Code 1950, § 32-195.17; 1956, c. 268, § 38.1-830; 1978, c. 658, § 38.1-806; 1979, c. 721; 1980, c. 682, § 38.1-911; c. 720, § 38.1-884; 1981, c. 530, § 38.1-946; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-221. Enforcement of penalties.
The Commission may impose, enter judgment for, and enforce any civil penalty or other penalty pronounced against any person for violating any of the provisions of this title, subject to the hearing provisions of § 12.1-28 . The power and authority conferred upon the Commission by this section shall be in addition to and not in substitution for the power and authority conferred upon the courts by general law to impose civil penalties for violations of the laws of this Commonwealth.
History. Code 1950, § 38-26; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-41; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-221.1. Confidentiality of information.
Whenever, during the course of a market conduct examination pursuant to Article 4 (§ 38.2-1317 et seq.) of Chapter 13 or inspection request or inquiry pursuant to § 38.2-200 , the Commission requests an insurer to furnish information which the insurer considers confidential proprietary information, such confidential proprietary information shall be submitted to the Commission but shall be excluded from, and the Commission shall not be subject to, subpoena or public inspection with respect to such information if the insurer (i) invokes such exclusion, in writing, upon submission of the data or other materials for which protection from disclosure is sought; (ii) identifies the data or other materials for which protection is sought; and (iii) states the reason why protection is necessary. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Commission from (i) using such confidential proprietary information in furtherance of any regulatory or legal action; (ii) publishing any decisions, orders, findings, opinions, or judgments; or (iii) publishing any final market conduct report or any other report containing aggregated findings, provided that such report, decisions, orders, findings, opinions, or judgments shall not disclose such confidential proprietary information unless the Commission has found, after the insurer has been provided notice and opportunity to be heard, that such information is not confidential proprietary information. No waiver of an existing privilege or claim of confidentiality shall occur as a result of disclosure to the Commission under this section.
History. 2000, c. 527.
§ 38.2-221.2. Treatment of confidential information pursuant to federal law.
- Any information denominated in writing as confidential by a federal regulator and received by the Commission pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Public Law §§ 106-102) (hereafter, the federal act) shall be excluded from, and the Commission shall not be subject to, subpoena or public inspection with respect to such information.
- Pursuant to the federal act, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commission may provide to a federal regulator any examination or other report, record or information to which the Commission has access with respect to any person who is engaged in the business of insurance in this Commonwealth and is an affiliate or agent of a depository institution or financial holding company, as those terms are defined in the federal act, provided that the federal regulator has the legal authority, and shall agree in writing, as a condition precedent to its receipt of such information, to maintain such information in confidence as provided in the federal act and to take all reasonable steps to oppose any effort to secure disclosure of such information.
- The provision by the Commission pursuant to this section, or the provision by a federal regulator pursuant to the federal act, of such information shall not constitute, operate as a waiver of, or otherwise affect any existing privilege or any claim of confidentiality to which the information is otherwise subject.
- Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Commission from (i) using such confidential information in furtherance of any regulatory or legal action; (ii) publishing any decisions, orders, findings, opinions or judgments; or (iii) publishing any final report or any other report containing aggregated findings, provided that such reports, decisions, orders, findings, opinions or judgments shall not disclose any such confidential information.
- For purposes of this section, “federal regulator” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
History. 2001, c. 519.
§ 38.2-221.3. Confidentiality of applications and investigations.
- For purposes of this section, “business entity” means a partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, corporation, or other legal entity that is entitled to hold property in its own name and that is not a sole proprietorship.
- This section applies to the Commission’s authority to license, register, or authorize business entities pursuant to this title. This section shall not apply to any license issued under Chapter 18 (§ 38.2-1800 et seq.).
- All applications, documents, materials, or other information produced by, obtained by, or disclosed to the Commission or any other person in the course of an investigation, or a review of an application, shall be given confidential treatment, is not subject to subpoena, and may not be made public by the Commission or any other person. The Commission may grant access to (i) a regulatory official of any state or country; (ii) the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, its affiliate, or its subsidiary; or (iii) a law-enforcement authority of any state or country, provided that those officials are required under their law to maintain its confidentiality. Any such disclosure by the Commission shall not constitute a waiver of confidentiality of such applications, documents, materials, or other information, or copies thereof. Any parties receiving such information shall agree in writing prior to receiving the information to provide to it the same confidential treatment as required by this section, unless the prior written consent of the business entity to which it pertains has been obtained.
- Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Commission from (i) using such confidential information in furtherance of any regulatory or legal action; (ii) publishing any decisions, orders, findings, opinions, or judgments; or (iii) publishing any final report or any other report containing aggregated findings, provided that such reports, decisions, orders, findings, opinions, or judgments shall not disclose any such confidential information.
History. 2009, c. 352; 2016, c. 250.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendment by c. 250 deleted “(i)” preceding “license, register,” and deleted “and (ii) license automobile clubs pursuant to Chapter 3.1 (§ 13.1-400.1 et seq.) of Title 13.1” at the end of the first sentence in subsection B.
§ 38.2-222. Appeals generally.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this title, § 12.1-39 shall apply to the appeal of any final (i) finding, (ii) decision settling the substantive law, (iii) order, or (iv) judgment of the Commission issued pursuant to this title.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-223. Rules and regulations; orders.
The Commission, after notice and opportunity for all interested parties to be heard, may issue any rules and regulations necessary or appropriate for the administration and enforcement of this title.
History. 1986, c. 562.
Cross references.
As to promulgation of rules and regulations for step therapy protocols, see § 38.2-3407.9:05 .
As to promulgation of rules and regulations for limiting cost-sharing payments for prescription insulin drugs, see § 38.2-3407.15:5 .
§ 38.2-224. Procedures.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this title, Chapter 5 (§ 12.1-25 et seq.) of Title 12.1 shall apply to proceedings under this title.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-225. Disposition of fines and penalties.
- All fines recovered for criminal violations of this title or for criminal violations of rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to this title shall be paid into the state treasury to the credit of the Literary Fund.
- All penalties and compromise settlements recovered for civil violations of this title or civil violations of rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to this title shall be paid into the state treasury. Pursuant to §§ 38.2-1620 and 38.2-1718 these funds shall be credited to the Literary Fund or if the Commission determines a need, to either (i) the Virginia Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association established pursuant to Chapter 16 of this title or (ii) the Virginia Life, Accident and Sickness Insurance Guaranty Association established pursuant to Chapter 17 of this title.
History. Code 1950, § 38-25; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-42; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-226. Provisions of title not to apply to certain mutual aid associations.
This title shall not apply to beneficial, relief, or mutual aid societies, or partnerships, plans, associations, or corporations, established prior to 1935 and formed by churches for the purpose of aiding members who sustain property losses by fire, lightning, hail, storm, flood, explosion, power failure, theft, burglary, vandalism, civil commotion, airplane and vehicular damage, and in which the privileges and memberships in these societies, partnerships, plans, associations, or corporations are confined to members of the churches.
History. 1981, c. 171, § 38.1-42.1; 1985, c. 361; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-226.1. Expired.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1996, c. 628, which enacted this section, provided for its expiration on July 1, 1997, pursuant to clause 2 of the 1996 legislation. Acts 1997, cc. 414 and 475, amended the text of the section, but did not amend the expiration clause. Therefore, at the direction of the Code Commission, this section is now set out as expired.
§ 38.2-226.2. Provisions of title not applicable to certain long-term care health plans.
- This title shall not apply to pre-PACE long-term care health plans (i) authorized by the United States Health Care Financing Administration pursuant to § 1903 (m) (2) (B) of Title XIX of the United States Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396b et seq.) and the state plan for medical assistance services as established pursuant to Chapter 10 (§ 32.1-323 et seq.) of Title 32.1 and (ii) which have signed agreements with the Department of Medical Assistance Services as long-term care health plans.
- This title shall not apply to PACE long-term care health plans (i) authorized as programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly by Subtitle I (§ 4801 et seq.) of Chapter 6 of Title IV of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 528 et seq., §§ 4801-4804, 1997, pursuant to Title XVIII and Title XIX of the United States Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1395eee et seq.) and the state plan for medical assistance services as established pursuant to Chapter 10 (§ 32.1-323 et seq.) of Title 32.1 and (ii) which have signed agreements with the Department of Medical Assistance Services as long-term care health plans.
- Enrollment in a pre-PACE or PACE plan shall be restricted to those individuals who participate in programs authorized pursuant to Title XIX or Title XVIII of the United States Social Security Act, respectively.
History. 1998, c. 318.
§ 38.2-226.3. Expired.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2000, c. 669, cl. 2, provided that the provisions of this section, which provided that the provisions of Title 38.2 were not applicable to certain health plans, would expire on July 1, 2001.
§ 38.2-227. Public policy regarding punitive damages.
It is not against the public policy of the Commonwealth for any person to purchase insurance providing coverage for punitive damages arising out of the death or injury of any person as the result of negligence, including willful and wanton negligence, but excluding intentional acts. This section declares existing policy.
History. 1983, c. 353, § 38.1-42.2; 1986, c. 562.
Research References.
Friend’s Virginia Pleading and Practice (Matthew Bender). Chapter 23 Damages. § 23.05 Punitive Damages. Friend.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 5C M.J. Damages, § 64.
CASE NOTES
No punitive damages in property damage cases. —
This section does not extend to awards of punitive damages in property damage cases. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Aspen Bldg. Corp., 235 Va. 263 , 367 S.E.2d 478, 4 Va. Law Rep. 2435, 1988 Va. LEXIS 58 (1988).
Payment of punitive damages by insurer. —
Where plaintiff insurance carrier unsuccessfully sought a jury instruction that the insurer would be paying any punitive damage award, the decision not to so instruct the jury was upheld because of potential prejudice to plaintiffs; § 38.2-227 specifically stated that it was not against public policy for any person to purchase insurance providing coverage for punitive damages awarded in personal injury negligence cases, and allowing insurers to pay was not contingent upon whether such insurer exercises rights of subrogation. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Wade, 265 Va. 383 , 579 S.E.2d 180, 2003 Va. LEXIS 53 (2003).
§ 38.2-228. Proof of future financial responsibility.
At the request of a named insured, a licensed property and casualty insurer shall provide without unreasonable delay to the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles proof of future financial responsibility as required by the provisions of Title 46.2.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-229. Immunity from liability.
- There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action against any person for furnishing in good faith to the Commission information relating to the investigation of any insurance or reinsurance transaction when such information is furnished under the requirements of law or at the request or direction of the Commission.
- There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action against the Commission, the Commissioner of Insurance, or any of the Commission’s employees or agents, acting in good faith, for investigating any insurance or reinsurance transaction or for the dissemination of any official report related to an official investigation of any insurance or reinsurance transaction.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-230. Distributions by nonstock corporation.
No dividend or distribution of income, as used in § 13.1-814 , shall be made to a member corporation of a corporation licensed under the provisions of this title unless the corporation has received approval by the Commission prior to the distribution. In approving the distribution, the Commission shall give consideration to the subscribers’ or policyholders’ best interest.
History. 1985, c. 380, § 38.1-39.1; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-231. Notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage or increase in premium of certain liability insurance policies.
-
-
No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of (i) a policy of insurance as defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (ii) a policy of insurance that includes as a part thereof insurance as defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (iii) a policy of motor vehicle insurance against legal liability of the insured as defined in §
38.2-124
insuring a business entity; or (iv) a policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance as defined in subsection B of §
38.2-111
insuring a business entity shall be effective unless the insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy a written notice of cancellation or refusal to renew, or
delivers such notice electronically to the address provided by the first named insured. Such notice shall: A. 1. No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of (i) a policy of insurance as defined in § 38.2-117 or
38.2-118 insuring a business entity; (ii) a policy of insurance that includes as a part thereof insurance as defined in § 38.2-117 or 38.2-118 insuring a business entity; (iii) a policy of motor vehicle insurance against
legal liability of the insured as defined in §
38.2-124
insuring a business entity; or (iv) a policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance as defined in subsection B of §
38.2-111
insuring a business entity shall be effective unless the insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy a written notice of cancellation or refusal to renew, or
delivers such notice electronically to the address provided by the first named insured. Such notice shall:
- Be in a type size authorized under § 38.2-311 ;
- State the date, which shall not be less than 45 days after the delivery or mailing of the notice of cancellation or refusal to renew, on which such cancellation or refusal to renew shall become effective, except that such effective date may not be less than 15 days from the date of mailing or delivery when the policy is being cancelled or not renewed for failure of the insured to discharge when due any of its obligations in connection with the payment of premium for the policy;
- State the specific reason or reasons of the insurer for cancellation or refusal to renew;
- Advise the first named insured of its right to request in writing, within 15 days of the receipt of the notice, that the Commissioner of Insurance review the action of the insurer; and
- In the case of a policy of motor vehicle insurance, inform the first named insured of the possible availability of other insurance which may be obtained through its agent, through another insurer, or through the Virginia Automobile Insurance Plan.
- Nothing in this subsection shall apply to any policy of insurance if the named insured or his duly constituted attorney-in-fact has notified orally, or in writing, if the insurer requires such notification to be in writing, the insurer or its agent that he wishes the policy to be canceled or that he does not wish the policy to be renewed, or if, prior to the date of expiration, he fails to accept the offer of the insurer to renew the policy.
- Nothing in this subsection shall apply if an affiliated insurer has manifested its willingness to provide coverage at a lower premium than would have been charged for the same exposures on the expiring policy. The affiliated insurer shall manifest its willingness to provide coverage by issuing a policy with the types and limits of coverage at least equal to those contained in the expiring policy unless the named insured has requested a change in coverage or limits. When such offer is made by an affiliated insurer, an offer of renewal shall not be required of the insurer of the expiring policy, and the policy issued by the affiliated insurer shall be deemed to be a renewal policy.
-
No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of (i) a policy of insurance as defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (ii) a policy of insurance that includes as a part thereof insurance as defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (iii) a policy of motor vehicle insurance against legal liability of the insured as defined in §
38.2-124
insuring a business entity; or (iv) a policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance as defined in subsection B of §
38.2-111
insuring a business entity shall be effective unless the insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy a written notice of cancellation or refusal to renew, or
delivers such notice electronically to the address provided by the first named insured. Such notice shall: A. 1. No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of (i) a policy of insurance as defined in § 38.2-117 or
38.2-118 insuring a business entity; (ii) a policy of insurance that includes as a part thereof insurance as defined in § 38.2-117 or 38.2-118 insuring a business entity; (iii) a policy of motor vehicle insurance against
legal liability of the insured as defined in §
38.2-124
insuring a business entity; or (iv) a policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance as defined in subsection B of §
38.2-111
insuring a business entity shall be effective unless the insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy a written notice of cancellation or refusal to renew, or
delivers such notice electronically to the address provided by the first named insured. Such notice shall:
- No insurer shall cancel or refuse to renew a policy of motor vehicle insurance against legal liability of the insured as defined in § 38.2-124 insuring a business entity solely because of lack of supporting business or lack of the potential for acquiring such business.
-
No reduction in coverage for personal injury or property damage liability initiated by an insurer and no insurer-initiated increase in the premium greater than 25 percent of (i) a policy of insurance defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (ii) a policy of insurance that includes as a part thereof insurance defined in §
38.2-117
or
38.2-118
insuring a business entity; (iii) a policy of motor vehicle insurance against legal liability of the insured as defined in §
38.2-124
insuring a business entity; or (iv) a policy of miscellaneous casualty insurance as defined in subsection B of §
38.2-111
insuring a business entity, and which in the case of a reduction in coverage is subject to §
38.2-1912
, shall be effective unless the insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy, or delivers electronically to the address provided by the first named insured, a written notice
of such reduction in coverage or premium increase not later than 45 days prior to the effective date of same. The increase in premium shall be the difference between the renewal premium and the premium charged by the insurer at
the effective date of the expiring policy. Such notice shall:
- Be in a type size authorized under § 38.2-311 ;
- State the date, which shall not be less than 45 days after the delivery or mailing of the notice of reduction in coverage or increase in premium, on which such reduction in coverage or increase in premium shall become effective;
- Advise the first named insured of the specific reason for the increase and the amount of the increase, or, if in the case of a reduction in coverage, the specific reason for the reduction and the manner in which coverage will be reduced, or that such information may be obtained from the agent or the insurer;
- Advise the first named insured of its right to request in writing, within 15 days of receipt of the notice, that the Commissioner of Insurance review the action of the insurer.
- If an insurer does not provide notice in the manner required in subsection C, coverage shall remain in effect until 45 days after written notice of reduction in coverage or increase in premium is mailed or delivered to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy, or delivered electronically to the address provided by the first named insured, unless the named insured obtains replacement coverage or elects to cancel sooner in either of which cases coverage under the prior policy shall cease on the effective date of the replacement coverage or the elected date of cancellation as the case may be. If the named insured fails to accept or rejects the changed policy, coverage for any period that extends beyond the expiration date will be under the prior policy’s rates, terms and conditions as applied against the renewal policy’s limits, rating exposures, and additional coverages. If the named insured accepts the changed policy, the reduction in coverage or increase in premium shall take effect upon the expiration of the prior policy.
-
Notice of reduction in coverage or increase in premium shall not be required if:
- The insurer, after written demand, has not received, within 45 days after such demand has been mailed or delivered to the first named insured at the address shown on the policy, or delivered electronically to the address provided by the first named insured, sufficient information from the named insured to provide the required notice;
- Such notice is waived in writing by the named insured;
- The insurer delivers or mails to the first named insured a renewal policy or a renewal offer not less than 45 days prior to the effective date of the policy or, in the case of a medical malpractice insurance policy, not less than 90 days prior to the effective date of the policy;
- The policy is issued to a large commercial risk as defined in subsection C of § 38.2-1903.1 but excluding policies of medical malpractice insurance; or
- The policy is retrospectively rated, where the premium is adjusted at the end of the policy period to reflect the risk’s actual loss experience.
-
No written notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium that is mailed or delivered electronically by an insurer to a first named insured in accordance with this section shall be effective unless the insurer
complies with the applicable provisions of subdivisions 1 through 4:
-
If the notice is mailed, proof of mailing a notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium shall be obtained using one of the following methods that demonstrates the date that the notice was sent to the first named
insured at the address stated in the policy or to such insured’s last known address:
-
The notice is sent by:
- Registered mail;
- Certified mail; or
- Any other similar first-class mail tracking method used or approved by the United States Postal Service, including Intelligent Mail barcode Tracing (IMb Tracing); or
- The notice is sent by another method of mailing for which a certificate of mailing is obtained from the United States Postal Service at the time the notice is accepted for mailing. A certificate of mailing from the United States Postal Service does not include a certificate of bulk mailing.
-
The notice is sent by:
- If the notice is delivered electronically, the insurer retains evidence of electronic transmittal or receipt of the notification for at least one year from the date of the transmittal.
- If the notice is mailed, the insurer retains a copy of the notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium for at least one year from the date such action was effective. If the notice is mailed, proof of mailing from the United States Postal Service consistent with the mailing method utilized by the insurer shall be maintained for one year from the date the cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium is effective.
-
- If the terms of a policy of motor vehicle insurance insuring a business entity require the notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium to be given to any lienholder, then the insurer shall mail such notice and retain a copy of the notice in the manner required by this subsection. If the notices sent to the first named insured and the lienholder are part of the same form, the insurer may retain a single copy of the notice. Proof of mailing from the United States Postal Service consistent with the mailing method utilized by the insurer shall be maintained for one year from the date the cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium is effective.
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 4 a, if the terms of the policy require the notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium to be given to any lienholder, the insurer and lienholder may agree by separate agreement that such notices may be transmitted electronically, provided that the insurer and lienholder agree upon the specifics for transmittal and acknowledgment of notification. Evidence of transmittal or receipt of the notification required by this subsection shall be retained by the insurer for at least one year from the date of termination.“Copy,” as used in this subsection, includes photographs, microphotographs, photostats, microfilm, microcard, printouts, or other reproductions of electronically stored data or copies from optical disks, electronically transmitted facsimiles, or any other reproduction of an original from a process that forms a durable medium for its recording, storing, and reproducing.
-
If the notice is mailed, proof of mailing a notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium shall be obtained using one of the following methods that demonstrates the date that the notice was sent to the first named
insured at the address stated in the policy or to such insured’s last known address:
- Nothing in this section shall prohibit any insurer or agent from including in a notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or premium increase any additional disclosure statements required by state or federal laws.
- For the purpose of this section, the terms (i) “business entity” shall mean an entity as defined by subsection A of § 13.1-543 , § 13.1-603 or 13.1-803 and shall include an individual, a partnership, an unincorporated association, the Commonwealth, a county, city, town, or an authority, board, commission, sanitation, soil and water, planning or other district, public service corporation owned, operated or controlled by the Commonwealth, a locality or other local governmental authority; (ii) “policy of motor vehicle insurance” shall mean a policy or contract for bodily injury or property damage liability insuring a business entity issued or delivered in this Commonwealth covering liability arising from the ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle, but does not include (a) any policy issued through the Virginia Automobile Insurance Plan, (b) any policy providing insurance only on an excess basis, or (c) any other contract providing insurance to the named insured even though the contract may incidentally provide insurance on motor vehicles; and (iii) “reduction in coverage” shall mean, but not be limited to, any diminution in scope of coverage, decrease in limits of liability, addition of exclusions, increase in deductibles, or reduction in the policy term or duration except a reduction in coverage filed with and approved by the Commission and applicable to an entire line, classification or subclassification of insurance.
- Within 15 days of receipt of the notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or increase in premium, the named insured shall be entitled to request in writing to the Commissioner that he review the action of the insurer. Upon receipt of the request, the Commissioner shall promptly begin a review to determine whether the insurer’s notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or premium increase complies with the requirements of this section. Where the Commissioner finds from the review that the notice of cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or premium increase does not comply with the requirements of this section, he shall immediately notify the insurer, the named insured and any other person to whom such notice was required to be given by the terms of the policy that such notice is not effective. Nothing in this section authorizes the Commissioner to substitute his judgment as to underwriting for that of the insurer. Pending review by the Commission, this section shall not operate to relieve an insured from the obligation to pay any premium when due; however, if the Commission finds that the notice required by this section was not proper, the Commission may order the insurer to pay to the insured any overpayment of premium made by the insured.
- Every insurer shall maintain for at least one year records of cancellation, refusals to renew, reductions in coverage, and premium increases to which this section applies and copies of every notice or statement required by subsections A, C, F, and L that it sends to any of its insureds.
- There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action of any nature shall arise against (i) the Commissioner of Insurance or his subordinates; (ii) any insurer, its authorized representative, its agents, or its employees; or (iii) any firm, person, or corporation furnishing to the insurer information as to reasons for cancellation, refusal to renew, reduction in coverage, or premium increase, for any statement made by any of them in complying with this section or for providing information pertaining thereto.
- Notwithstanding anything in this section to the contrary, if an insurer cancels or refuses to renew a policy of medical malpractice insurance as defined in § 38.2-2800 , or if, as a result of an insurer-initiated increase in premium, the premium increases for a medical malpractice insurance policy by more than 25 percent of the previous policy’s premium, the insurer shall provide no fewer than 90 days’ notice prior to the renewal effective date, or, if such policy is being cancelled or non-renewed for failure of the insured to discharge when due any of its obligations in connection with the payment of premium for the policy, the effective date of cancellation or refusal to renew shall not be less than 15 days from the date of mailing or delivery of the notice. The increase in the premium shall be the difference between the renewal premium and the premium charged by the insurer at the effective date of the expiring policy.
- As used in this section, an “insurer-initiated increase in premium” means an increase in premium other than one resulting from changes in (i) coverage requested by the insured, (ii) policy limits requested by the insured, (iii) the insured’s operation or location that result in a change in the classification of the risk, or (iv) the rating exposures including, but not limited to, increases in payroll, receipts, square footage, number of automobiles insured, or number of employees.
History. 1986, c. 376, § 38.1-43.01; 1987, c. 697; 1988, c. 189; 1989, c. 728; 1992, c. 160; 1996, c. 237; 1998, c. 142; 2000, c. 529; 2003, cc. 387, 678; 2005, cc. 290, 635; 2006, c. 554; 2008, cc. 58, 221; 2009, c. 215; 2013, cc. 13, 257; 2015, cc. 9, 443; 2016, cc. 4, 71.
Editor’s note.
This section was enacted as § 38.1-43.01 by Acts 1986, c. 376. Pursuant to § 30-152, this section has been incorporated into Title 38.2 as § 38.2-231 .
The 1998 amendment, in subdivision A 2, inserted “orally, or,” and “if the insurer requires such notification to be in writing.”
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 529 designated the first paragraph of subdivision 3 of subsection F as a, and added subdivision 3 b.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 387, throughout the section, substituted “15” for “fifteen” and “45” for “forty-five”; substituted “25” for “twenty-five” in subsection C; added subdivision F c and made minor stylistic changes.
The 2003 amendment by c. 678, effective March 19, 2003, throughout the section, substituted “45” for “forty-five” and “15” for “fifteen”; substituted “25 percent” for “twenty-five percent” in subsection C; and substituted “subsection A of § 13.1-543 ” for “subsection B of § 13.1-543 ” in subsection H.
The 2005 amendments.
The 2005 amendment by c. 290, in the first sentence of the introductory paragraph in subdivision A 1 and in subsection C, inserted the clause (i) through (iii) designators and clause (iv); and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2005 amendment by c. 635 substituted “premium” for “rate” throughout subsections C through K; in subsection C, substituted “premium” for “filed rate for such coverage,” deleted “initiated by an insurer” preceding “of a policy of insurance,” and added the last sentence; rewrote subdivision C 3; deleted subdivision C 4, which formerly read: “State the specific reason or reasons for the reduction in coverage or increase in rate;” redesignated former subdivision C 5 as present subdivision C 4; substituted “subsections A, C, F and L” for “subsections A, C and F” in subsection J; added subsection L; and made related and minor stylistic changes.
The 2006 amendments.
The 2006 amendment by c. 554 inserted “insurer-initiated” in subsection C; in subdivision C 3, substituted “insured of” for “insured that” and inserted “or that such information” preceding “may be obtained”; inserted “as applied against the renewal policy’s limits, rating exposures, and additional coverages” at the end of the third sentence in subsection D; in subsection E, deleted “the” at the end of the introductory language, inserted the subdivision 1 and 2 designations, deleted “or if such” at the end of subdivision E 1, inserted “Such” at the beginning of subdivision E 2, and added subdivisions E 3 through E 5; inserted “as a result of an insurer-initiated increase in premium” in the first sentence of subsection L; and added subsection M.
The 2008 amendments.
The 2008 amendments by cc. 58 and 221 are nearly identical, and added subdivision A 3.
The 2009 amendments.
The 2009 amendment by c. 215 added the language beginning “however, if the written notice” at the end of the first sentence in the introductory language of subsection A; inserted “or delivers electronically to the address provided by the named insured” in the first sentence of the introductory language in subsection C; inserted “or delivered electronically to the address provided by the named insured” in the first sentence of subsection D and in subdivision E 1; in subsection F, inserted “or delivered when authorized for a notice other than a notice of cancellation” in the introductory language, substituted “or” for “and” at the end of paragraph F 1 c, added paragraph F 1 d and made related changes.
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendment by c. 13 inserted “first” preceding “named insured” and “first named” preceding “insured” throughout the section.
The 2013 amendment by c. 257 substituted “or delivers such notice” for “however, if the written notice is a notice of refusal to renew, it may be delivered” near the end of the introductory paragraph of A 1; deleted “when authorized for a notice other than a notice of cancellation” following “delivered electronically” in subsection F; and made punctuation changes.
The 2015 amendments.
The 2015 amendments by cc. 9 and 443 are identical, and at the end of subdivision F 1 a inserted “or any other similar first-class mail tracking method that is used or approved by the United States Postal Service; or”; deleted former subdivisions F 1 b and F 1 c, which read “b. At the time of mailing the insurer obtains a written receipt from the United States Postal Service showing the name and address of the first named insured stated in the policy; c. At the time of mailing the insurer (i) obtains a written receipt from the United States Postal Service showing the date of mailing and the number of items mailed and (ii) retains a mailing list showing the name and address of the first named insured stated in the policy, or the last known address, to whom the notices were mailed, together with a signed statement by the insurer that the written receipt from the United States Postal Service corresponds to the mailing list retained by the insurer”; and redesignated former subdivision F 1 d as subdivision F 1 b.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendments by c. 4, effective February 23, 2016, and c. 71, effective March 1, 2016, are identical and in subsection F, added “the insurer complies with the applicable provisions of subdivisions 1 through 4” at the end of the introductory paragraph; rewrote subdivisions F 1 through 4; and made minor stylistic changes.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 27.
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Notice of lapse of property insurance. —
Named insured lien holder was not entitled to notice of a lapse of property insurance coverage based on the insured’s failure to pay the premium due under the policy; the insurance company was not required to issue a cancellation notice because there was no contract to cancel as of the date the policy lapsed for non-payment. Nat'l Bank of Fredericksburg v. Va. Farm Bureau Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 63 Va. Cir. 102, 2003 Va. Cir. LEXIS 193 (Fredericksburg Aug. 28, 2003), aff'd, 269 Va. 148 , 606 S.E.2d 832, 2005 Va. LEXIS 12 (2005).
Cancellation ineffective. —
Insurer’s notice of cancellation failed to comply with subdivision F 1 of § 38.2-231 , because the insured’s address was incomplete on the postal receipt and the accompanying signed statement was not signed at the time of mailing. Performance Grading & Hauling, Inc. v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co., 82 Va. Cir. 322, 2011 Va. Cir. LEXIS 177 (Norfolk Mar. 3, 2011).
§ 38.2-232. Notice of lapse or pending lapse of certain life and accident and sickness insurance policies.
- Every insurer, health services plan, or health care plan that issues a policy, contract, or plan of insurance or annuity as defined in §§ 38.2-102 through 38.2-109 shall provide the policy owner, contract owner, or plan owner with a written notice prior to the date that the policy, contract, or plan will lapse for failure to pay premiums due.
- The provisions of subsection A shall not apply (i) to group policies, contracts, or plans of insurance or (ii) to individual policies, contracts, or plans of insurance if the insurer, health services plan, or health care plan (a) as a general business practice provides its policy owners, contract owners, or plan owners with written notices of premiums due or (b) has furnished its policy owner, contract owner, or plan owner with written notice separate from that contained in the policy that the failure to pay premiums in a timely manner will result in a lapse of such policy, contract, or plan.
History. 1991, c. 369; 2013, c. 93.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2013, c. 93, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act are declarative of existing law.”
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendment by c. 93 added the subsection designators, and in subsection B, added “The provisions of subsection A” at the beginning, inserted “group” preceding “policies” and deleted “group” preceding “insurance” in clause (i), substituted “to individual policies, contracts, or plans of insurance if” for “where” at the beginning of clause (ii), inserted the (a) and (b) designators, deleted “(iii) where the insurer, health services plan, or health care plan” preceding (b), and made punctuation changes.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 27.
CASE NOTES
Presumption of actual receipt. —
Executor did not establish that an insurer failed to give the notice required by § 38.2-232 to an insured prior to cancellation of a life insurance policy for nonpayment of premiums; there was no clear error in findings that the insurer’s electronic proof of mailing established a presumption of actual receipt that was not sufficiently rebutted. Russell v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co., 401 Fed. Appx. 763, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23449 (4th Cir. 2010).
Private right of action. —
Although this section does not create an independent cause of action against an insurer, the owner and beneficiary of a life insurance policy could properly assert a violation of the statute to support its claim that the insurer breached the contract of insurance regarding notices it alleged were given regarding the failure to pay premiums and a subsequent lapse in coverage. Auxo Med., LLC v. Ohio Nat'l Life Assur. Corp., No. 3:11cv259-DWD, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72349 (E.D. Va. July 6, 2011).
§ 38.2-233. Credit involuntary unemployment insurance; credit property insurance; disclosure and readability.
- If a creditor makes available to the debtors more than one plan of credit involuntary unemployment insurance as defined in § 38.2-122.1 , or more than one plan of credit property insurance as defined in § 38.2-122.2 , all debtors must be informed of all such plans for which they are eligible.
- When elective credit property insurance or elective credit involuntary unemployment insurance is offered, the borrower shall be given written disclosure that purchase of such insurance is not required and is not a factor in granting credit. The disclosure shall also include notice that the borrower has the right to use alternative coverage or to buy insurance elsewhere.
-
If the debtor is given a contract which includes a single premium payment to be charged for elective credit property insurance or elective credit involuntary unemployment insurance, the debtor shall be given:
- A contract which does not include the elective insurance premiums; or
- A disclosure form which shall clearly disclose the difference in premiums charged for a contract with the elective insurance and one without the elective insurance. This disclosure shall include the difference between the amount financed, the monthly payment and the charge for insurance. The form shall be signed and dated by the debtor and the agent, if any, soliciting the application or the creditor’s representative, if any, soliciting the enrollment request. A copy of this disclosure shall be given to the debtor and a copy shall be made a part of the creditor’s loan file.Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit the creditor from combining such disclosure, in order to avoid redundancy, with other forms of disclosure required under state or federal law.
- If a creditor offers credit property insurance and requires evidence of insurance coverage on personal household property used as security for an indebtedness or credit involuntary unemployment insurance is required as security for any indebtedness, the debtor shall have the option of (i) furnishing the required amount of insurance through existing policies of insurance owned or controlled by him or (ii) procuring and furnishing the required coverage through any insurer authorized to transact insurance in this Commonwealth. The creditor shall inform the debtor of this option in writing and shall obtain the debtor’s signature acknowledging that he understands this option. Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit the creditor from combining such disclosure, in order to avoid redundancy, with other forms of disclosure required under state or federal law.
- No contract of insurance upon a debtor paid by a single premium shall be made or effectuated unless, at the time of the contract, the debtor is provided with a notice prominently disclosing the right to a refund of premium in the event the insurance is terminated prior to its scheduled maturity date or the insured indebtedness is terminated or paid off early, and of the obligation of the debtor to provide notification to the insurer under subsection G. This notice shall be signed and dated by the debtor and the agent, if any, soliciting the application or the creditor’s representative, if any, soliciting the enrollment request. A copy of the signed notice shall be given to the debtor and a copy shall be made part of the insurer’s file.
- The disclosure requirements set forth in subsections A, B, C, D, and E shall be disclosed separately from the loan or credit transaction papers in a form or forms approved by the Commission. When credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance is offered with credit life insurance or credit accident and sickness insurance, the disclosure requirements set forth in subsections A, B, C, D, and E of § 38.2-233 and the disclosure requirements set forth in subsections A, B, C, D, and E of § 38.2-3735 may be disclosed together in a form which shall be approved by the Commission.
- The Commission shall not approve any form providing credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance unless the policy or certificate is written in nontechnical, readily understandable language, using words of common everyday usage. A form shall be deemed acceptable under this section if the insurer certifies that the form achieves a Flesch Readability Score of forty or more, using the Flesch Readability Formula as set forth in Rudolf Flesch, The Art of Readable Writing (1949, as revised 1974), and certifies compliance with the guidelines set forth in this section.The Commission shall not approve any form providing credit property or credit involuntary unemployment insurance paid by single premium unless the form includes a provision, separately and prominently captioned, stating in substance the following:“REFUND OF PREMIUM IN THE EVENT OF EARLY TERMINATION”“In the event this insurance policy or certificate is terminated prior to its originally scheduled maturity date, or the insured indebtedness is terminated or paid off earlier than scheduled, the insurer shall, within 30 days of receipt of notification from the debtor of such termination or early payoff, refund or credit any amount paid by the debtor for the insurance beyond the actual date of termination or payoff. Early termination of debt includes termination by renewal or refinancing. The debtor’s notification to the insurer shall include proof of termination or early payoff of the insured indebtedness.”The Commission shall not approve any form providing credit property or credit involuntary unemployment insurance unless the insurance policy or certificate states that the unearned premium refund will be calculated on a pro rata basis. No refund of five dollars or less need be made.The Commission shall not approve any form providing credit property or credit involuntary unemployment insurance unless the form has printed on it a notice stating in substance that if, during a period of at least ten days from the date the policy or certificate is delivered to the policy owner or certificate holder the policy or certificate is surrendered to the insurer or its agent with a written request for cancellation, the policy or certificate shall be void from the beginning and the insurer shall refund any premium paid for the policy or certificate.
- Premium calculations for credit property insurance involving closed end credit transactions shall not be based on amounts paid for finance charges, service fees, delivery charges, taxes, interest, or any other item not covered under the credit property insurance form. If the premium calculations for credit property insurance involving open end monthly outstanding balance credit transactions are based on amounts paid for finance charges, service fees, delivery charges, taxes, interest, meals, entertainment, or any other item not covered under the credit property insurance form, then at least twice per year the premium notice for such insurance shall be accompanied by a disclosure in no smaller than eight-point boldface type substantially similar to the following:Your credit property insurance premium is based on the entire outstanding balance of this account. However, your insurance coverage applies only to certain tangible personal property. Finance charges, service fees, delivery charges, taxes, interest, meals, and entertainment are not covered under your policy. Therefore, you may be paying premiums on items not covered under your policy.The disclosure described in this subsection, with the same type-size requirements, shall also be included in any written materials provided at the time of invitation to contract and in policies or certificates provided to insureds.
-
A credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance policy or certificate which provides truncated or critical period coverage, or any other type of similar coverage that does not provide benefits or coverage for the entire term or
amount of the indebtedness, shall be subject to the following requirements:
- The policy or certificate shall include a statement printed on the face of the policy or first page of the certificate which clearly describes the limited nature of the insurance. The statement shall be printed in capital letters and in bold twelve-point or larger type; and
- The policy or certificate shall not include any benefits or coverage other than truncated or critical period coverage or any other type of similar coverage that does not provide benefits or coverage for the entire term or amount of the indebtedness.
- A portion of the premium charged for credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance may be allowed by the insurer to the creditor for providing and furnishing such insurance, and no such allowance shall be deemed a rebate of premium or as interest charges or consideration or an amount in excess of permitted charges in connection with the loan or other credit transaction.
- All of the acts necessary to provide and service credit property insurance and credit involuntary unemployment insurance may be performed within the same place of business in which is transacted the business giving rise to the loan or other credit transaction.
-
Subsections A, B, C, D, F, and M shall not apply to credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance that will insure open end monthly outstanding balance credit transactions if the following criteria are met:
- The insurance is offered to the debtor after the loan or credit transaction it will insure has been approved by the creditor and has been effective at least seven days;
- The solicitation for the insurance is by mail or telephone. The person making the solicitation shall not condition the future use or continuation of the open end credit upon the purchase of credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance;
- The creditor makes available only one plan of credit property insurance and only one plan of credit involuntary unemployment insurance to the debtor;
- The debtor is provided written confirmation of the insurance coverage within thirty days of the effective date of such coverage. The effective date of such coverage shall begin on the date the solicitation is accepted; and
- The individual policy or certificate has printed on it a notice stating that if, during a period of at least thirty days from the date the policy or certificate is delivered to the policy owner or certificate holder, the policy or certificate is surrendered to the insurer or its agent with a written request for cancellation, the policy or certificate shall be void from the beginning and the insurer shall refund any premium paid for the policy or certificate. This statement shall be prominently located on the face page of the policy or certificate, and shall be printed in capital letters and in bold face twelve-point or larger type.
-
Subsections A, B, C, D, F, and L shall not apply to open end credit transactions by mail, telephone, or brochure solicitations that are not excluded from the requirements of subsections A, B, C, D, and F by subsection L where the insurer is offering only
one plan of credit property insurance and only one plan of credit involuntary unemployment insurance and the following criteria are met:
-
The following disclosures shall be included in solicitations, whether as part of the application or enrollment request or separately:
- The name and address of the insurer(s) and creditor; and
- A description of the coverage offered, including the amount of coverage, the premium rate for the insurance coverage offered, and a description of any exceptions, limitations or restrictions applicable to such coverage.
-
The application or enrollment requests shall comply as follows:
- Notwithstanding requirements set forth elsewhere, the application and enrollment request shall be printed in a type size of not less than eight-point type, one-point leaded;
- The application or enrollment request shall contain a prominent statement that the insurance offered is optional, voluntary or not required;
- The application or enrollment request shall contain no questions relating to insurability other than the debtor’s age or date of birth and, if applicable, active employment status; and
- If the disclosures required by subdivision 1 of this subsection are not included in the application or enrollment request, the application and enrollment request shall make reference to such disclosures with sufficient information to assist the reader in locating such disclosures within separate solicitation material.
- Each insurer proposing to utilize an application or enrollment request in such transactions shall file such form for approval by the Commission. If the insurer anticipates utilizing such application or enrollment form in more than one solicitation, the insurer shall submit, as part of its filing of such form, a certification signed by an officer of the insurer, stating that any such subsequent use of the application or enrollment form will utilize the same form number and will not vary in substance from the wording and format in which the form is submitted for approval. Upon approval of such application or enrollment form by the Commission, the insurer shall be permitted to utilize such form in various solicitation materials provided that the application or enrollment form, when incorporated into such solicitation materials, has the same form number and wording substantially identical to that contained on the approved application or enrollment form. When credit property insurance or credit involuntary unemployment insurance is offered with credit life insurance or credit accident and sickness insurance, insurers may file one common form which shall be subject to prior approval by the Commission and shall incorporate the requirements of subsection M of this section and subsection F of § 38.2-3737 , according to the requirements stated in this paragraph and in subdivision F 3 of § 38.2-3737 .
-
The following disclosures shall be included in solicitations, whether as part of the application or enrollment request or separately:
History. 1993, c. 774; 1994, c. 306; 1995, c. 167; 1999, c. 586; 2000, c. 526; 2009, c. 643.
The 1999 amendment, in subsection C, inserted “if any” in two places in the third sentence of subdivision 2, and added the concluding paragraph, added the last sentence in subsection D, in subsection F, added the last sentence, deleted former subdivision 1, which read: “Each insurer is required to test the readability of its policies or certificates by use of the Flesch Readability Formula, as set forth in Rudolf Flesch, The Art of Readable Writing (1949, as revised 1974),” deleted former subdivision 2, which read: “A total readability score of forty or more on the Flesch score is required; and,” and deleted former subdivision 3, which read: “All policies or certificates within the scope of this section shall be filed with the Commission, accompanied by a certificate setting forth the Flesch score and certifying compliance with the guidelines set forth in this section,” and substituted “the insurance coverage” for “each plan of insurance” in subdivision K 1 b.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 526 inserted “or more than one plan of credit property insurance as defined in § 38.2-122.2 ” in subsection A; in subsection B, inserted “credit property insurance or elective” and substituted “such” for “credit involuntary unemployment”; inserted “credit property insurance or elective” in subsection C; substituted “insurance premiums” for “credit involuntary unemployment insurance premium” in subdivision C 1; substituted “the elective” for “credit involuntary unemployment” in subdivision C 2, in two places; inserted “a creditor offers credit property insurance and requires evidence of insurance coverage on personal household property used as security for an indebtedness or” near the beginning of subsection D; in subsection E, substituted “disclosed separately from the loan or credit transaction papers in a” for “separately disclosed in another” and substituted “When credit property insurance or” for “Notwithstanding the provisions of § 38.2-1921 , when”; in subsection F, inserted “credit property insurance or” and added the last two paragraphs; added subsection G and redesignated former subsections G through K as present subsections H through L; inserted “credit property insurance or” in present subsection H; deleted “credit involuntary unemployment insurance” preceding “policy or” in subdivisions H 1 and H 2; inserted “credit property insurance or” in present subsections I and K and in subdivision K 2; inserted “credit property insurance and” in present subsection J; substituted “E and L” for “E and K” in present subsection K; substituted “The insurance” for “Credit involuntary unemployment insurance that will insure the open end monthly outstanding balance credit transaction” in subdivision K 1; inserted “only one plan of credit property insurance and” in subdivision K 3; in present subsection L, substituted “K” for “J” in two places, and inserted “only one plan of credit property insurance and”; inserted “if applicable” in subdivision L 2 c; and in subdivision L 3, substituted “When credit property insurance or” for “Notwithstanding the provisions of § 38.2-1921 ,” substituted “subject to prior approval” for “approved,” and substituted “subsection L” for “subsection K.”
The 2009 amendments.
The 2009 amendment by c. 643 added subsection E and redesignated former subsections E through L as subsections F through M; substituted “subsections A, B, C, D, and E” for “subsections A, B, C and D” three times in subsection F; in subsection G, substituted “paid by single premium unless the form includes a provision, separately and prominently captioned, stating in substance the following” for “unless the form provides that, in the event of termination of the insurance prior to the scheduled maturity date of the indebtedness, any refund of an amount paid by the debtor for insurance shall be paid or credited promptly to the debtor. Any unearned premium refund shall be calculated on a pro rata basis” in the second paragraph and added the present third through fifth paragraphs; substituted “Subsections A, B, C, D, F, and M” for “Subsections A, B, C, D, E and L” at the beginning of subsection L; and in subsection M, in the introductory paragraph, substituted “Subsections A, B, C, D, F, and L” for “Subsections A, B, C, D, E and K” and “subsections A, B, C, D, and F by subsection L” for “subsections A, B, C, D, and E by subsection K” and substituted “subsection M of this section” for “subsection L of § 38.2-233 ” in the last sentence of subdivision M 3.
§ 38.2-234. Release of information.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 5 of § 2.2-3802 , the Commission may share information with databases developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) for use by regulators.
History. 1996, c. 32.
§ 38.2-235. Liability insurance; carbon monoxide exclusions.
No policy of insurance furnishing personal injury liability or property damage liability coverage as defined in §§ 38.2-117 and 38.2-118 , including any endorsements thereto, shall be deemed to exclude coverage for the discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release, emission, leakage or escape of carbon monoxide from a residential or commercial heating system unless excluded in such policy by explicit reference thereto.
History. 1997, c. 157.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10B M.J. Insurance, § 128.
§ 38.2-236. Notice of settlement payment.
- Upon payment by any insurer of at least $5,000 in a single check to an attorney licensed in the Commonwealth, or other representative, in settlement or satisfaction by an insured or a third party of any claim arising out of an insurance policy issued or delivered in the Commonwealth, the insurer shall send to the claimant or judgment creditor on the underlying insurance or liability claim a notice of such payment as required by subsection B within five business days after the date payment is made or sent to the attorney or other representative of the claimant or judgment creditor. A copy of the notice shall be sent simultaneously to the attorney or representative of the claimant or judgment creditor.
- The notice required pursuant to subsection A shall be sent to the physical address, or email or other electronic address, furnished by the claimant or judgment creditor to the insurance company, unless the claimant or judgment creditor has notified the insurance company in writing that he waives notice of payment. In the absence of any address or waiver furnished by the claimant or judgment creditor, the notice shall be sent to the last known physical address, or email or other electronic address, of the claimant or judgment creditor.The notice shall be sent by the insurance company only after a settlement has been agreed to by the attorney or other representative of the claimant or judgment creditor, and shall contain only the following language:“Pursuant to § 38.2-236 of the Code of Virginia, you are hereby notified that a payment was sent on (insert date on which payment was sent) by (insert name of insurer) to your attorney or other representative (insert name, address, and telephone number of attorney or other representative known to insurer), in satisfaction of your claim or judgment against (insert name of insurer, or insured, whichever is appropriate).If you have any questions, please contact your attorney or other representative.”
- Nothing in subsection A or B shall (i) create any cause of action for monetary damages for any person against an insurer based upon a failure to provide notice as required by this section or the provision of a defective notice, (ii) establish a defense for any person to any cause of action based on a failure to provide notice as required by this section or the provision of a defective notice, or (iii) invalidate or in any way affect the settlement or satisfaction for which the payment was made by the insurer.
- Except as provided and authorized by this section, no insurer shall otherwise communicate with a claimant or judgment creditor known to be represented by an attorney licensed in the Commonwealth, or other representative, regarding settlement of a claim or satisfaction of a judgment without the written consent of such attorney or other representative.
History. 2013, c. 146.
Research References.
Virginia Forms (Matthew Bender). No. 1-401 Petition for Approval of Compromise of Infant’s Personal Injury Claim, et seq.; No. 2-1503 Order Dismissing Suit Pursuant to Compromise Without Prejudice, et seq.
Chapter 3. Provisions Relating to Insurance Policies and Contracts.
§ 38.2-300. Scope of chapter.
This chapter shall apply to all classes of insurance except:
- Ocean marine insurance other than private pleasure vessels;
- Life insurance policies and accident and sickness insurance policies not delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth;
- Contracts of reinsurance; or
- Annuities, except as provided for in §§ 38.2-305 , 38.2-316 and 38.2-321 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-328; 1986, c. 562; 1988, cc. 333, 523.
Law Review.
For note on insurance contracts and methods of interpretation, see 18 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 104 (1961).
For note on fraud as a defense to insurance contracts, see 18 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 172 (1961).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 17.
§ 38.2-301. Insurable interest required; life, accident and sickness insurance.
- Any individual of lawful age may take out an insurance contract upon himself for the benefit of any person. No person shall knowingly procure or cause to be procured any insurance contract upon another individual unless the benefits under the contract are payable to (i) the insured or his personal representative or (ii) a person having an insurable interest in the insured at the time when the contract was made.
-
As used in this section and §
38.2-302
, “insurable interest” means:
- In the case of individuals related closely by blood or by law, a substantial interest engendered by love and affection;
- In the case of other persons, a lawful and substantial economic interest in the life, health, and bodily safety of the insured. “Insurable interest” shall not include an interest which arises only or is enhanced by the death, disability or injury of the insured;
- In the case of employees of corporations, with respect to whom the corporate employer, a trust established by the corporate employer, or an employee benefit trust is the beneficiary under an insurance contract, the lawful and substantial economic interest required in subdivision 2 of this subsection shall be deemed to exist in (i) key employees and (ii) other employees who have been employed by the corporation for 12 consecutive months, provided that the amount of insurance coverage on such other employees shall be limited to an amount which is commensurate with employer-provided benefits to non-key employees as a group;
- In the case of a party to a contract or option for the purchase or sale, including a redemption, of an interest in a business proprietorship, partnership or firm or of shares of stock of a corporation or of an interest in such shares, the lawful and substantial economic interest required in subdivision 2 shall be deemed to exist in each individual party to such contract or option and for the purpose of such contract or option only, in addition to any insurable interest that may otherwise exist as to the life of such individual;
- In the case of a trustee, other than the trustee of a domestic business trust or foreign business trust, as defined in § 13.1-1201 , the lawful and substantial economic interest required in subdivision 2 shall be deemed to exist, whether the life insurance policy is owned by a trustee before, on or after July 1, 2005, in (i) the individual insured who established the trust, (ii) each individual in whose life the owner of the trust for federal income tax purposes has an insurable interest, and (iii) each individual in whose life a beneficiary of the trust has an insurable interest; and
- In the case of an organization described in § 501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code, the lawful and substantial economic interest required in subdivision 2 of this subsection shall be deemed to exist where (i) the insured or proposed insured has either assigned all or part of his ownership rights in a policy or contract to such an organization or has executed a written consent to the issuance of a policy or contract to such organization and (ii) such organization is named in the policy or contract as owner or as beneficiary.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-329; 1986, c. 562; 1988, c. 831; 1992, cc. 8, 50; 1993, c. 105; 2005, cc. 656, 698; 2007, c. 186.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1992, cc. 8 and 50, which amended this section, in cl. 2 provide that the provisions of the 1992 act are declaratory of existing law.
Acts 2005, cc. 656 and 698, cl. 2, as amended by Acts 2007, c. 186, cl. 2, provide: “That the provisions of this act shall not apply to policies or contracts of life insurance currently or subsequently issued where: (i) a charitable organization headquartered in Virginia executed a nondisclosure and exclusivity agreement prior to December 31, 2004, (ii) such charitable organization was the holder of a charity certificate issued by a business trust prior to December 31, 2004, and (iii) the policies or contracts of life insurance are written pursuant to such agreement on the lives of individuals who, prior to December 31, 2004, were donors to such charitable organization, or an organization under common control with such organization. The intent of the General Assembly is to permit any charitable organization that satisfies the criteria set forth in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) to continue to acquire charity certificates following the enactment of this act.”
The 2005 amendments.
The 2005 amendments by cc. 656 and 698 are identical, and substituted “representative or (ii)” for “representative, (ii) a beneficiary designated by the insured, or (iii)” in subsection A; in subdivision B 3, inserted “a trust established by the corporate employer” and substituted “non-key employees as a group” for “such employees,” inserted present subdivisions B 4 and B 5 and redesignated former subdivision B 4 as subdivision B 6; and made minor stylistic changes.
The 2007 amendments.
The 2007 amendment by c. 186 inserted “whether the life insurance policy is owned by a trustee before, on or after July 1, 2005” in subdivision B 5.
§ 38.2-302. Life, accident, and sickness insurance; application required.
-
No contract of insurance upon a person shall be made or effectuated unless at the time of the making of the contract the individual insured, being of lawful age and competent to contract for the insurance contract, (i) applies for insurance or (ii) consents
in writing to the insurance contract. However:
- Either spouse may effect an insurance contract upon each other;
- Any person having an insurable interest in the life of a minor, or any person upon whom a minor is dependent for support and maintenance, may effect an insurance contract upon the life of or pertaining to the minor; or
- A corporate employer or an employee benefit trust having the insurable interest described in subdivision B 3 of § 38.2-301 may effect an insurance contract upon the lives of such employees, provided that the employer or trust provides the employee with notice in writing that such insurance has been purchased, the amount of such coverage, and to whom benefits are payable in the event of the employee’s death.
- Nothing in this section shall prohibit a minor from obtaining insurance on his own life as authorized in § 38.2-3105 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-330; 1986, c. 562; 1988, c. 831; 1993, c. 105; 2020, c. 900.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 900, in subdivision A 1, substituted “Either spouse” for “A wife or husband” and in subdivision A 3, substituted “subdivision B 3” for “subdivision 3 of subsection B.”
Law Review.
For 2000 survey of Virginia insurance law, see 34 U. Rich. L. Rev. 883 (2000).
CASE NOTES
Consent in writing. —
No valid life insurance contract existed where son filled out and signed life insurance application on the life of his father because father’s alleged oral authorization to son and father’s participation in medical examination and signing of medical form did not constitute written consent as required by this statute. Hilfiger v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 256 Va. 265 , 505 S.E.2d 190, 1998 Va. LEXIS 109 (1998).
§ 38.2-303. Insurable interest required; property insurance.
- No insurance contract on property or on any interest therein or arising therefrom shall be enforceable except for the benefit of persons having an insurable interest in the property insured.
- As used in this section, “insurable interest” means any lawful and substantial economic interest in the safety or preservation of the subject of insurance free from loss, destruction or pecuniary damage.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-331; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For note, “Insurable Interest in Property in Virginia,” see 44 Va. L. Rev. 278 (1958).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10B M.J. Insurance, § 172.
CASE NOTES
Section codifies decision and reasoning in. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Bolling, 176 Va. 182 , 10 S.E.2d 518, 1940 Va. LEXIS 245 (1940); Home Ins. Co. v. Dalis, 206 Va. 71 , 141 S.E.2d 721, 1965 Va. LEXIS 171 (1965).
Insurable interest is mandatory. —
Given the clear statutory mandate, reflecting public policy, that where an insured lacks an insurable interest the contract shall not be enforceable, a court may properly determine whether an insurable interest exists even if the issue was not raised by the parties. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Definition of “insurable interest.” —
Any person who has an interest in the property, legal or equitable, or who stands in such a relation thereto that its destruction would entail pecuniary loss upon him, has an insurable interest to the extent of his interest therein, or of the loss to which he is subjected by the casualty. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Everywhere there is a tendency to broaden the definition of an insurable interest; neither legal nor equitable title is necessary; any title or interest in the property, legal or equitable, will support a contract of insurance on such property. The term interest, as used in the phrase insurable interest is not limited to property or ownership in the subject matter of the insurance; where the interest of insured in, or his relation to, the property is such that he will be benefited by its continued existence or suffer a direct pecuniary injury by its loss, his contract of insurance will be upheld, although he has no legal or equitable title. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Exposure to pecuniary loss. —
Virginia law makes clear that the primary inquiry is whether and to what extent the economic interests of a person are exposed to a pecuniary loss; moreover, whether an insurable interest exists is a broad inquiry, with economic realities prevailing over legalisms, such as whether the insured holds legal or equitable title to the property. Virginia courts have found an insurable interest where the insured has an ownership interest, a leasehold interest, or a contract right or contract obligation; however, while the concept of an insurable interest is broad and expansive, it has limits and there is a point beyond which an insured’s economic interests become so attenuated, remote or contingent as to become uninsurable. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Insureds’ interests and obligations with respect to the property came within the statutory definition of an insurable interest; the interests the insured had with respect to the property were lawful, substantial, and economic and they also were affected by the safety or preservation of the subject of insurance free from loss, destruction or pecuniar damage. Noteworthy were the insurer’s concerns that a recognition of the insureds’ contingent, indirect interests as insurable interests, particularly in light of the claimed damage to those interests, might violate the indemnity principle and result in a potential windfall or improper double recovery; those concerns, however, were best addressed, not through a finding that no insurable interest existed under the broad statutory definition, but through the proper valuation of the insureds’ insurable interest and any calculable loss associated with those interests. Tiger Fibers, LLC v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 594 F. Supp. 2d 630, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3228 (E.D. Va. 2009).
Property of after-acquired subsidiary. —
Coverage under an insurance policy did not exist for fire damage to a building owned by a subsidiary of an insured limited liability company because the policy’s coverage-extension provision for newly acquired buildings could not be fairly read to apply to the property of a newly acquired subsidiary that was neither a named, nor an additional insured on the policy. Erie Ins. Exch. v. EPC MD 15, LLC, 297 Va. 21 , 822 S.E.2d 351, 2019 Va. LEXIS 2 (2019).
Stolen vehicle. —
The interest a car dealer acquired for value without notice that the car was stolen property was economic, substantial, and lawful and such interest was insurable. Castle Cars, Inc. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 221 Va. 773 , 273 S.E.2d 793, 1981 Va. LEXIS 207 (1981).
Contractor and architect have interest in preserving building from loss. —
Although building was substantially complete and occupied, until final payment was made, the property constituted inchoate security for the payment of contract debts due the contractor and the architect for performance of the entire work. Thus, at the time the loss occurred — three months before the date of final payment — both the contractor and the architect had a substantial economic interest in preserving the building from loss. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. McDevitt & St. Co., 234 Va. 191 , 360 S.E.2d 825, 4 Va. Law Rep. 785, 1987 Va. LEXIS 228 (1987).
§ 38.2-304. Contracts of temporary insurance; duration; what deemed to include.
- Oral or written binders or other temporary insurance contracts may be made and used for a period not exceeding sixty days pending the issuance of the policy. Unless otherwise provided, oral or written binders or other temporary insurance contracts shall be deemed to include the usual provisions, stipulations and agreements which are commonly used in this Commonwealth in effecting the class of insurance being written.
- This section shall not apply to:
History. Code 1950, § 38-181; 1952, c. 317, § 38.2-332; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For survey of Virginia law on insurance for the year 1972-1973, see 59 Va. L. Rev. 1535 (1973).
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 20.
CASE NOTES
Generally parties must agree on certain provisions. —
While this section specifically permits oral binders of temporary insurance, as a general rule the parties must normally agree upon provisions such as those required by § 38.2-305 , although under certain circumstances, some of these elements may be supplied by inference. Dickerson v. Conklin, 218 Va. 59 , 235 S.E.2d 450, 1977 Va. LEXIS 171 (1977).
Oral binder consists of usual provisions absent special agreement. —
An oral binder or contract for temporary insurance pending issuance of a written policy consists, in the absence of special agreement, of the usual provisions of contracts employed to effect like insurance. First Protection Life Ins. Co. v. Compton, 230 Va. 166 , 335 S.E.2d 262, 1985 Va. LEXIS 264 (1985).
Where the parties to a temporary contract for insurance do not specially agree upon all the essential terms, they are presumed to have contemplated the terms, conditions, and limitations of the usual policies covering similar risks. First Protection Life Ins. Co. v. Compton, 230 Va. 166 , 335 S.E.2d 262, 1985 Va. LEXIS 264 (1985).
Oral credit insurance contract. —
While oral insurance contracts are generally enforceable if the essential elements are adequately proven, this rule does not apply to an oral contract for credit insurance. The statute governing credit accident and sickness insurance requires that all credit insurance be evidenced by a written policy, certificate, or statement and sets forth the required provisions of such instruments. First Protection Life Ins. Co. v. Compton, 230 Va. 166 , 335 S.E.2d 262, 1985 Va. LEXIS 264 (1985).
It is apparent that the General Assembly intended to proscribe only oral contracts of insurance never commemorated by a writing, not oral binders or contracts of temporary credit insurance pending issuance of a written policy. First Protection Life Ins. Co. v. Compton, 230 Va. 166 , 335 S.E.2d 262, 1985 Va. LEXIS 264 (1985).
§ 38.2-305. Contents of policies.
-
Each insurance policy or contract shall specify:
- The names of the parties to the contract;
- The subject of the insurance;
- The risks insured against;
- The time the insurance takes effect and, except in the case of group insurance, title insurance, and insurance written under perpetual policies, the period during which the insurance is to continue;
- A statement of the premium, except in the case of group insurance and title insurance; and
- The conditions pertaining to the insurance.In addition, each policy of property and casualty insurance shall contain a list of all policy forms and endorsements applicable to that policy, which shall display the respective form numbers and, if those form numbers are not unique identifiers of such forms, the applicable edition dates.
- Each new or renewal insurance policy, contract, certificate, or evidence of coverage issued to a policyholder, covered person, or enrollee shall be accompanied by a notice stating substantially:“IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR INSURANCE”“In the event you need to contact someone about this insurance for any reason, please contact your agent. If no agent was involved in the sale of this insurance, or if you have additional questions, you may contact the insurance company issuing this insurance at the following address and telephone number: [Insert the appropriate address and telephone number, toll free number if available, for the company’s home or regional office].”“If you have been unable to contact or obtain satisfaction from the company or the agent, you may contact the Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Insurance at: [Insert the appropriate address, toll free phone number, and phone number for out-of-state calls for the Bureau of Insurance].”“Written correspondence is preferable so that a record of your inquiry is maintained. When contacting your agent, company or the Bureau of Insurance, have your policy number available.”Health maintenance organizations shall add the following: “We recommend that you familiarize yourself with our grievance procedure and make use of it before taking any other action.”
- In any life insurance or annuity contract containing a beneficiary designation in which the designated beneficiary is the spouse of the policy owner, the following notice shall be included with the policy when issued, either attached to or incorporated into the front or first page of such contract:“BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION MAY NOT APPLY IN THE EVENT OF ANNULMENT OR DIVORCE”“Under Virginia law (Virginia Code § 20-111.1 ), a revocable beneficiary designation in a policy owned by one spouse that names the other spouse as beneficiary becomes void upon the entry of a decree of annulment or divorce, and the death benefit prevented from passing to a former spouse will be paid as if the former spouse had predeceased the decedent. In the event of annulment or divorce proceedings, and if it is the intent of the parties that the beneficiary designation of the former spouse is to continue, you are advised to make certain that one of the following courses of action is taken prior to the entry of a decree of annulment or divorce: (i) change the beneficiary designation to make it irrevocable; (ii) change the ownership of the policy or contract; (iii) execute a separate written agreement stating the intention of both parties that the beneficiary designation is to remain in effect beyond the date of entry of the decree of annulment or divorce; or (iv) make certain that the decree of annulment or divorce contains a provision stating that the beneficiary designation is not to be revoked pursuant to § 20-111.1 .”
- If, under the contract, the exact amount of premiums is determinable only at the termination of the contract, a statement of the basis and rates upon which the final premium is to be determined and paid shall be furnished to any policy-examining bureau having jurisdiction or to the insured upon request.
- This section shall not apply to surety insurance contracts.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-333; 1986, c. 562; 1987, c. 519; 1988, c. 333; 1997, c. 688; 2000, c. 193; 2012, c. 264; 2013, c. 27.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 193 inserted present subsection C, and redesignated former subsections C and D as present subsections D and E.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 264, effective October 1, 2012, added the paragraph following subdivision A 6.
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendment by c. 27, in subsection B, transferred the former third paragraph of the notice to become the present last paragraph thereof.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 18.
CASE NOTES
When oral contract enforceable. —
An oral contract of insurance may be enforceable, either at law or in equity, if all essential elements are proven by clear and convincing evidence. Dickerson v. Conklin, 218 Va. 59 , 235 S.E.2d 450, 1977 Va. LEXIS 171 (1977).
Generally parties must agree on certain provisions. —
While § 38.2-304 specifically permits oral binders of temporary insurance, as a general rule, the parties must normally agree upon provisions such as those required by this section, although under certain circumstances, some of these elements may be supplied by inference. Dickerson v. Conklin, 218 Va. 59 , 235 S.E.2d 450, 1977 Va. LEXIS 171 (1977).
Court unable to supply essential elements for oral contract of insurance. —
Where there was no clear and convincing evidence that there was a meeting of the minds of the plaintiff and defendant on the essential elements necessary to create an oral contract of automobile liability insurance, the court would have had to supply virtually every essential element in order for affirmation to be meaningful and to provide an enforceable contract, and this the court was without authority to do. Dickerson v. Conklin, 218 Va. 59 , 235 S.E.2d 450, 1977 Va. LEXIS 171 (1977).
Each element listed in this section must be proved by clear and convincing evidence in order to establish an oral contract of insurance. Yates v. Whitten Valley Rental Corp., 226 Va. 436 , 309 S.E.2d 330, 1983 Va. LEXIS 302 (1983).
Some elements of credit accident or sickness insurance policy may be supplied by inference. —
By statute, a policy, certificate, or statement of credit accident or sickness insurance must state, among other things, “a description of the coverage including the amount and term thereof, and any exceptions, limitations, or restrictions.” Although the parties normally must expressly agree on each essential element of an insurance contract, some of these elements may be supplied by inference in certain circumstances, including cases involving temporary insurance binders. First Protection Life Ins. Co. v. Compton, 230 Va. 166 , 335 S.E.2d 262, 1985 Va. LEXIS 264 (1985).
Insurer’s right to void policy for misrepresentation. —
The Virginia Supreme Court has specifically upheld provisions in insurance policies that limit the insurer’s right to void the policy for misrepresentation. Atlantic Permanent Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. American Cas. Co., 839 F.2d 212, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1759 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1056, 108 S. Ct. 2824, 100 L. Ed. 2d 925, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2677 (1988).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Demurrer. —
Insured’s breach of contract claim hinged on a question of fact that could not be resolved by a demurrer or plea in bar because it was the responsibility of the fact finder to determine whether the oral contract in question was for insurance coverage or brokerage services before any determination could be made about the sufficiency of the oral contract. S. Wallace Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Selective Way Ins. Co., 101 Va. Cir. 425, 2017 Va. Cir. LEXIS 877 (Surry County Mar. 24, 2017). Later proceeding at S. Wallace Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Selective Way Ins. Co., 2018 Va. Cir. LEXIS 1288 (Va. Cir. Ct., Jan. 18, 2018); rev’d in part by, 2019 Va. Unpub. LEXIS 28 (Nov. 14, 2019).
§ 38.2-306. Additional contents.
A policy or contract may contain additional provisions that are not substantially in conflict with this title and that:
- Are required to be inserted by the laws of the insurer’s state or country of domicile or of the state or country in which the policy is to be delivered or issued for delivery; or
- Are necessary to state the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract because of the manner in which the insurer is constituted or operated.
History. Code 1950, § 38-513; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-334; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-307. Charter and bylaw provisions in policies.
No policy shall contain any provision purporting to make any portion of the charter, bylaws or other organic law of the insurer, however designated, a part of the contract unless that portion is set out in full in the policy. Any policy provision in violation of this section shall be invalid.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-335; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-308. Contingent liability provisions in policies issued by certain mutual insurers.
Except in the case of nonassessable policies, the contingent liability of each member of a mutual insurer, other than a life insurer, shall be clearly stated in the mutual insurer’s policies. The contingent liability may be limited, but such limitation shall not be less than one additional annual premium on each policy held by the member.
History. Code 1950, § 38-508; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-335.1; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-309. When answers or statements of applicant do not bar recovery on policy.
All statements, declarations and descriptions in any application for an insurance policy or for the reinstatement of an insurance policy shall be deemed representations and not warranties. No statement in an application or in any affidavit made before or after loss under the policy shall bar a recovery upon a policy of insurance unless it is clearly proved that such answer or statement was material to the risk when assumed and was untrue.
History. Code 1950, § 38-7; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-336; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For comment on materiality of ownership in automobile liability policies, see 19 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 141 (1962).
For note on automobile liability insurance and the voluntary-certified policy dichotomy, see 29 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 426 (1972).
For 2000 survey of Virginia insurance law, see 34 U. Rich. L. Rev. 883 (2000).
Research References.
Virginia Forms (Matthew Bender). No. 1-903 Complaint on a Medical Insurance Policy, et seq.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 40.
CASE NOTES
- I. General Consideration.
- II. Representation and Warranties.
- III. Materiality.
- IV. Effect of Acts of Agents.
I.General Consideration.
Purpose of section. —
Statutes like this section have been quite generally enacted to relieve against the hardships arising from the strict enforcement at common law of warranties in insurance policies concerning matters of no real relation to the risk assumed. Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (4th Cir. 1935).
While this section does focus on statements made by the applicant, its purpose is not to limit whose statements may be used to challenge a policy; rather, this section modifies the common-law fraud standard applied in determining whether a statement bars recovery to a material misrepresentation standard. Nyonteh v. Peoples Sec. Life Ins. Co., 958 F.2d 42, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1524 (4th Cir. 1992).
Companies have right to correct information. —
It is an accepted practice of insurance companies to issue health and accident policies based upon applications without medical examinations. Such companies have a right to be in possession of the true facts and correct information when they make a determination whether or not a risk should be assumed. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Dingus, 219 Va. 706 , 250 S.E.2d 352, 1979 Va. LEXIS 162 (1979).
An insurer is entitled to full and truthful disclosure. It is for the insurer, not the insured, to decide whether the true facts are significant or important because it is the insurer which is assuming the risk to which the true facts relate. Parkerson v. Federal Home Life Ins. Co., 797 F. Supp. 1308, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18158 (E.D. Va. 1992).
The language of this section is clear and unambiguous. Inter-Ocean Ins. Co. v. Harkrader, 193 Va. 96 , 67 S.E.2d 894, 1951 Va. LEXIS 243 (1951).
This section applies only to the application for the policy, and not to the policy itself. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
The provisions of this section relating to answers to interrogatories made by an applicant for a policy of insurance have no application to the warranties contained in the “iron safe clause” of fire insurance policies. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Alley, 104 Va. 356 , 51 S.E. 812 , 1905 Va. LEXIS 107 (1905).
This section pertains to statements and declarations made in the application for an insurance policy, and not to increases in the hazard under a provision of the policy, suspending coverage “while the hazard is increased by any means within the control of the insured.” American Ins. Co. v. Peyton, 272 F.2d 58, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3074 (4th Cir. 1959).
It sets forth the circumstances under which a false representation therein bars recovery on a policy. Chitwood v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 206 Va. 314 , 143 S.E.2d 915, 1965 Va. LEXIS 200 (1965).
Both falsity and materiality must be shown. —
This section and its predecessors have been construed to require an insurance company contesting a claim on the basis of an insured’s alleged misrepresentation to show, by clear proof, two facts: (1) that the statement on the application was untrue and (2) that the insurance company’s reliance on the false statement was material to the company’s decision to undertake the risk and issue the policy. Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Hunt & Calderone, P.C., 261 Va. 38 , 540 S.E.2d 491, 2001 Va. LEXIS 19 (2001).
It includes an application for reinstatement. —
Where the insured made a willfully false statement in application for reinstatement there could be no recovery on the reinstated policy. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Franklin, 118 Va. 418 , 87 S.E. 584 , 1916 Va. LEXIS 23 (1916).
This section is applicable to a policy issued pursuant to the Virginia Automobile Assigned Risk Plan. —
Such a policy is to be distinguished from “certified” policies which the insurer is required to accept pursuant to former § 46.1-497 et seq. (now § 46.2-464 ). Virginia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Saccio, 204 Va. 769 , 133 S.E.2d 268, 1963 Va. LEXIS 211 (1963).
Effect of “declarations” provision in policy. —
A provision in the policy that it was issued in reliance upon the truth of representations contained in the declarations in the policy and that the policy “embodies all agreements existing between” insured and insurer did not preclude the company from avoiding the policy because of material and fraudulent misstatements in the application. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Butler, 203 Va. 575 , 125 S.E.2d 823, 1962 Va. LEXIS 188 (1962).
Question as to “good health.” —
Plaintiff, who honestly thought her mother was in good health and so stated to defendant’s agent in answer to questions in applying for insurance on the mother’s life, was not precluded from recovering as beneficiary under the policy because the insured was then suffering from a latent illness of which plaintiff was unaware. The term “good health” means apparent sound health without knowledge to the contrary on the part of the applicant. Gilley v. Union Life Ins. Co., 194 Va. 966 , 76 S.E.2d 165, 1953 Va. LEXIS 165 (1953).
Reliance by insurance company on representations made to state agency. —
There is no authority authorizing an insurance company to rely on representations made to a state agency when issuing an insurance policy. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stegall, 293 F. Supp. 199, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8076 (W.D. Va. 1968).
Failure to instruct jury as to fraud in misstatements. —
It is error to fail to instruct the jury that any misstatements in the application which were relied upon by the defendant must have been fraudulent misstatements in accordance with § 38.2-3503 . Sutton v. American Health & Life Ins. Co., 683 F.2d 92, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17486 (4th Cir. 1982).
Statement need not be willfully false or fraudulently made. —
Under provision of this section that no statement in an application for an insurance policy will bar recovery unless the statement was material and untrue, the statement need not be willfully false or fraudulently made. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. United States Gypsum Co., 639 F. Supp. 1246, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22666 (W.D. Va. 1986).
Burden on insurer to show insured’s answers were knowingly false. —
It is usually not necessary for an insurer to establish that an untrue representation was willfully false or fraudulently made. However, where the insurer asks the insured to aver only that the representations are true to the best of the insured’s knowledge and belief, the insurer must clearly prove that the insured’s answers were knowingly false. Parkerson v. Federal Home Life Ins. Co., 797 F. Supp. 1308, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18158 (E.D. Va. 1992).
Mere nondisclosure not sufficient for fraud if investigation conducted. —
If one conducts an investigation, he cannot hold another in fraud unless material untrue affirmative representations were made. Mere nondisclosures would not be sufficient for fraud if an investigation is conducted. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. United States Gypsum Co., 639 F. Supp. 1246, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22666 (W.D. Va. 1986).
Limitation on general rule regarding jury questions. —
Generally, whether a statement is true and whether an untrue statement was knowingly made are questions of fact reserved for the jury. However, where the record shows clearly that the insured gave statements that were not true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Supreme Court of Virginia has held that a trial court errs in submitting that question to the jury. Parkerson v. Federal Home Life Ins. Co., 797 F. Supp. 1308, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18158 (E.D. Va. 1992).
When rescission appropriate. —
Rescission of the professional liability insurance policy was appropriate only if insurer clearly proved that an answer or statement in insured-fertility specialist’s renewal application for insurance was both (i) material to the risk assumed and (ii) untrue. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Jacobson, 826 F. Supp. 155, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9722 (E.D. Va. 1993), aff'd, 48 F.3d 778, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3089 (4th Cir. 1995).
Whether insurance company can satisfy the settled test for rescission depends on whether it can clearly prove that insured’s misrepresentation was material to the risk it assumed in issuing the policy. Breault v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 821 F. Supp. 410, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6612 (E.D. Va. 1993).
“Cancellation” did not preclude rescission. —
Insurer properly rescinded a law firm’s professional liability insurance based on a misrepresentation on application. The fact that the policy only provided for “cancellation” as the remedy for misrepresentations did not preclude the alternative remedy of rescission. TIG Ins. Co. v. Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, 116 Fed. Appx. 423, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24058 (4th Cir. 2004).
II.Representation and Warranties.
Warranty defined. —
A warranty, in the law of insurance, may be defined as a statement or stipulation in the policy as to the existence of a fact or a condition of the subject of the insurance which, if untrue, will prevent the policy from attaching as the contract of the insurer. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
Differentiated from representation. —
A warranty is a statement of a fact on the literal truth of which the validity of the contract depends; but, in the case of a representation, the validity of the policy does not depend upon the literal truth of the assertion. In other words, a warranty must be literally true, while a representation need be only substantially true. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
Underlying the whole doctrine of warranties and representations is the fundamental principle that warranties are always a part of the completed contract, while representations precede, are collateral to, and are not necessarily a part of the contract. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
Representations should not only be true but full. —
Representations in an application for a policy of insurance should not only be true but full. The insurer has the right to know the whole truth. If a true disclosure is made, it is put on guard to make its own inquiries, and determine whether or not the risk should be assumed. Chitwood v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 206 Va. 314 , 143 S.E.2d 915, 1965 Va. LEXIS 200 (1965); Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Echols, 207 Va. 949 , 154 S.E.2d 169, 1967 Va. LEXIS 161 (1967); Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Dingus, 219 Va. 706 , 250 S.E.2d 352, 1979 Va. LEXIS 162 (1979).
What constitutes an “untrue” disclosure. —
Insurer properly rescinded a law firm’s professional liability insurance based on a misrepresentation on application where the attorney who signed the insurance application on behalf of the law firm represented that he had no knowledge of incidents that could have resulted in a professional liability claim when, in fact, the attorney himself had misappropriated client funds. The law firm’s argument that the response was not “untrue,” because at the time the attorney signed the application no clients had notified him of their dissatisfaction, was without merit because client notification was not required under the plain language of the policy. TIG Ins. Co. v. Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, 116 Fed. Appx. 423, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24058 (4th Cir. 2004).
“Innocent partner” coverage. —
There was no merit to the contention that the firm’s partners were covered under the policy’s “innocent partner” provision because the policy’s “innocent partner” protection applied to claims made and did not extend to misrepresentations made on the application. TIG Ins. Co. v. Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, 116 Fed. Appx. 423, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24058 (4th Cir. 2004).
A factual representation is material to the risk to be assumed by an insurance company if it would reasonably influence the company’s decision whether or not to issue a policy. Breault v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 821 F. Supp. 410, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6612 (E.D. Va. 1993).
Insured not guilty of misrepresentation of fact material to risk. —
Where insured answered the questions in the application in good faith and he did not willfully make an incorrect or misleading statement in order to become eligible for a policy of insurance under the Voluntary Assigned Risk Plan, and if there was any concealment under the facts and circumstances, he was not responsible for it, he was not guilty of misrepresentation of a fact which was material to the risk. Buckeye Union Cas. Co. v. Robertson, 206 Va. 863 , 147 S.E.2d 94, 1966 Va. LEXIS 162 (1966).
Where answers are stated to be true to the best knowledge and belief of applicant. —
Where the answers in an application for insurance are stated to be true to the best knowledge and belief of the applicant, an incorrect statement innocently made in the belief in its truth will not avoid the policy, although there is also an agreement that any untrue or fraudulent statement shall avoid the policy. Sterling Ins. Co. v. Dansey, 195 Va. 933 , 81 S.E.2d 446, 1954 Va. LEXIS 171 (1954).
There was no merit to the company’s contention that if insured had diabetes, his misrepresentation of the fact in his application for a policy of health and accident insurance, though innocently made through lack of knowledge, avoided the policy under this section. The company, having provided in the application that the insured’s answers must be true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, was bound by the terms of its contract, which were not prohibited by this section nor inconsistent with public policy. This section did not prevent the parties from entering into a contract more favorable to the insured. Sterling Ins. Co. v. Dansey, 195 Va. 933 , 81 S.E.2d 446, 1954 Va. LEXIS 171 (1954).
LLC’s representative was not an “applicant.” —
Insurance company wrongfully rescinded a limited liability company’s insurance policy due to material misrepresentation after learning the representative who signed the policy on behalf of the LLC had a criminal record for insurance fraud, because the term “applicant” refers only to the party seeking to purchase insurance. There was nothing in the record to suggest that the applicant was acting individually when he completed and signed the application on behalf of the LLC; the policy covered property owned by the LLC. Jeb Stuart Auction Servs., LLC v. West Am. Ins. Co., 122 F. Supp. 3d 479, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106309 (W.D. Va. 2015).
No rescission even though memoranda contradicted oral representations. —
In case involving two insurers seeking to rescind mortgage insurance coverage which they claimed was procured by fraud, where both insurers had in their possession written memoranda contradicting oral representations as to the availability of rental deficit contribution funds for mortgage payment, rescission could not be accomplished under this section on that account. Foremost Guar. Corp. v. Meritor Sav. Bank, 910 F.2d 118, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13414 (4th Cir. 1990) (decided under former § 38.1-336).
Jury question. —
Whether a representation is made and the terms on which it is made, are questions of fact for the jury. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970).
III.Materiality.
A.Concepts.
False statement will not necessarily vitiate policy. —
A false statement made in an application for insurance concerning a mere temporary indisposition, not affecting the general health or constitution of the applicant, will not vitiate the policy, unless it be clearly proved that the statement was willfully false, or fraudulently made, or was material. The fact that the answer was merely untrue is not sufficient, under this section, to vitiate the policy. Modern Woodmen of Am. v. Lawson, 110 Va. 81 , 65 S.E. 509 , 1909 Va. LEXIS 118 (1909); Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (4th Cir. 1935).
One of the purposes of this section is to relieve against the rigorous consequences of the common-law rule that answers to interrogatories in applications for insurance imply that the subject matter of the questions and answers is material, and that if such answers are not true the policy is voidable. Sterling Ins. Co. v. Dansey, 195 Va. 933 , 81 S.E.2d 446, 1954 Va. LEXIS 171 (1954); Scott v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 202 Va. 579 , 118 S.E.2d 519, 1961 Va. LEXIS 148 (1961).
One of the purposes of this section is to relieve against the rigorous consequences of the common-law rule that answers to questions in applications for insurance imply that the subject matter of the questions and answers is material, and that if such statements and answers are not true the policy is voidable. Harrell v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co., 215 Va. 829 , 213 S.E.2d 792, 1975 Va. LEXIS 234 (1975).
It is no longer necessary to show that a misrepresentation was willfully false, or fraudulently made, to affect its materiality. A former requirement to the contrary was removed in 1919 from the Code of Virginia, when a general revision of the Code was made, and § 4220, Code of 1919, was enacted, the forerunner of this section. Chitwood v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 206 Va. 314 , 143 S.E.2d 915, 1965 Va. LEXIS 200 (1965).
The fact that the statement was not willfully false or fraudulently made does not affect its materiality. Old Republic Life Ins. Co. v. Bales, 213 Va. 771 , 195 S.E.2d 854, 1973 Va. LEXIS 229 (1973).
The materiality and falsity of a representation in an insurance application was determinative irrespective of whether the insured acted fraudulently. Gilmore v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 432 F. Supp. 35, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17347 (W.D. Va. 1977).
For an insurer to prove falsity is not sufficient under this section; the company must prove clearly that truthful answers would have reasonably influenced the company’s decision to issue the policy. Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Hunt & Calderone, P.C., 261 Va. 38 , 540 S.E.2d 491, 2001 Va. LEXIS 19 (2001).
Statement, etc., must be material as well as false. —
Under this section no statement, declaration, or description in an application for a policy of insurance shall be allowed to bar a recovery on the policy, or be construed as a warranty, unless it be clearly proved that it was both false and material to the risk. Green v. Southwestern Voluntary Ass'n, 179 Va. 779 , 20 S.E.2d 694, 1942 Va. LEXIS 274 (1942).
Recovery will not be barred by a statement in the application for insurance unless such statement is both false and material to the risk. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stegall, 293 F. Supp. 199, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8076 (W.D. Va. 1968).
But material misrepresentations are fatal. —
Misrepresentations made in an application for insurance which are material to the risk are fatal. Keeton v. Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co., 5 F.2d 183, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2626 (4th Cir. 1925); Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Ratcliffe, 163 Va. 325 , 175 S.E. 870 , 1934 Va. LEXIS 187 (1934).
A misrepresentation of facts material to the risk voids the insurance contract. Inter-Ocean Ins. Co. v. Harkrader, 193 Va. 96 , 67 S.E.2d 894, 1951 Va. LEXIS 243 (1951); Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. GEICO, 207 Va. 944 , 154 S.E.2d 173, 1967 Va. LEXIS 160 (1967).
Misrepresentations of facts, in an application for insurance, material to the risk when assumed, renders the contract void. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. National Indem. Co., 210 Va. 769 , 173 S.E.2d 855, 1970 Va. LEXIS 198 (1970).
An insured’s answer in an application for insurance which is material to the risk when assumed and untrue avoids the insurer’s liability under the policy. Gilmore v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 432 F. Supp. 35, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17347 (W.D. Va. 1977).
Suppressed facts need not have causal connection with death. —
It is of no consequence that the facts suppressed had no causal connection with the death of the insured, for they affect the very origin of the insurance contract, and, except for them, the contract would not have been made. Such facts cannot, therefore, be said to be immaterial within the meaning of this section. Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (4th Cir. 1935).
Materiality of a fact, in insurance law, is subjective. It concerns rather the impression which the fact claimed to be material would reasonably and naturally convey to the insurer’s mind before the event, and at the time the insurance is effected, than the subsequent actual causal connection between the fact, or the probable cause it evidences, and the event. Thus, it is by no means conclusive upon the question of materiality of a fact that it was actually one link in a chain of causes leading to the event. Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (4th Cir. 1935).
Test of materiality. —
A fair test of the materiality of a fact is found in the answer to the question whether reasonably careful and intelligent men would have regarded the fact communicated at the time of effecting the insurance as substantially increasing the chances of the loss insured against, so as to bring about a rejection of the risk or the charging of an increased premium. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Walker, 127 Va. 140 , 102 S.E. 585 , 1920 Va. LEXIS 40 (1920); Flannagan v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., 152 Va. 38 , 146 S.E. 353 , 1929 Va. LEXIS 151 (1929), overruled, Gilley v. Union Life Ins. Co., 194 Va. 966 , 76 S.E.2d 165, 1953 Va. LEXIS 165 (1953); Buckeye Union Cas. Co. v. Robertson, 206 Va. 863 , 147 S.E.2d 94, 1966 Va. LEXIS 162 (1966).
A fact is material to the risk to be assumed by an insurance company if the fact would reasonably influence the company’s decision whether or not to issue a policy. Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. GEICO, 207 Va. 944 , 154 S.E.2d 173, 1967 Va. LEXIS 160 (1967); Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Echols, 207 Va. 949 , 154 S.E.2d 169, 1967 Va. LEXIS 161 (1967); United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970); Gilmore v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 432 F. Supp. 35, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17347 (W.D. Va. 1977); Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Dingus, 219 Va. 706 , 250 S.E.2d 352, 1979 Va. LEXIS 162 (1979).
Misrepresentation of identity by assured concealed the fact that he had an interest in certain machines and prevented inquiry into his background, which would have disclosed the presence of unsatisfied judgments against him, and this misrepresentation was material. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970).
Must show actual reliance on the misrepresentation. —
An insurance company contesting a claim on the basis of an insured’s alleged misrepresentation in an application bears the burden to show that the statement at issue was untrue and that the insurance company’s reliance on the false statement was material to the company’s decision to issue the policy or to assess a certain premium. The materiality of a misrepresentation depends upon the intimate conceptual relationship between reliance and materiality, and the insurer must produce proof of actual reliance on the misrepresentation to meet this burden. Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Matney, No. 1:03CV00082, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6885 (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2004).
Burden is on insurer to prove materiality of misrepresentation. —
Materiality of a misrepresentation is an affirmative defense, and the burden is upon the insurer to prove it. Virginia Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 204 Va. 783 , 133 S.E.2d 277, 1963 Va. LEXIS 212 (1963); Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. GEICO, 207 Va. 944 , 154 S.E.2d 173, 1967 Va. LEXIS 160 (1967).
The insurer must “clearly prove” that the misrepresentation is material to the risk. Scott v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 202 Va. 579 , 118 S.E.2d 519, 1961 Va. LEXIS 148 (1961); Buckeye Union Cas. Co. v. Robertson, 206 Va. 863 , 147 S.E.2d 94, 1966 Va. LEXIS 162 (1966).
To be entitled to the voidance of the binder, the insurer had the burden of clearly proving that the assured falsely represented his identity and that the representation was material to the risk when assumed. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970).
In the ordinary case, where an insurance carrier seeks to escape liability for allegedly false statements made in an application for insurance, the proper standard of proof is gleaned from this section. The burden is on the carrier to clearly prove that a statement in an application is material to the risk when assumed and is untrue. Old Republic Life Ins. Co. v. Bales, 213 Va. 771 , 195 S.E.2d 854, 1973 Va. LEXIS 229 (1973).
Materiality of a misrepresentation is an affirmative defense. Harrell v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co., 215 Va. 829 , 213 S.E.2d 792, 1975 Va. LEXIS 234 (1975).
Under the explicit mandate of this section, the insurer had the burden of clearly proving that the insured’s answers in the application were material to the risk assumed and were untrue. Harrell v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co., 215 Va. 829 , 213 S.E.2d 792, 1975 Va. LEXIS 234 (1975).
The burden of clearly proving the affirmative defense of materiality of a misrepresentation is not carried when the court, to find the fact, must resort to assumption and conjecture. Harrell v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co., 215 Va. 829 , 213 S.E.2d 792, 1975 Va. LEXIS 234 (1975).
Whether the insured’s relative and the relative’s husband were regular operators of the insured’s pickup truck, and therefore whether the insured made an untrue statement on her insurance application, were questions of fact for the jury, so the insurer was denied summary judgment; furthermore, the insurer had not met its burden to show actual reliance on any alleged misrepresentation and had consequently not shown materiality. Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Matney, No. 1:03CV00082, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6885 (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2004).
Information concerning an applicant’s existing disability coverage is clearly material to an insurer’s decision to issue a disability policy because it bears on the possibility that the applicant, if overinsured, might feign a disabling illness or seek to avoid returning to work after a legitimate injury. Breault v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 821 F. Supp. 410, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6612 (E.D. Va. 1993).
Effect of incontestability clause on material misrepresentation. —
An insurer must contest a contract’s validity for false or fraudulent statements within the period prescribed in the policy, thus, an incontestability clause forecloses untimely challenges based on material misrepresentations in insurance applications. Nyonteh v. Peoples Sec. Life Ins. Co., 958 F.2d 42, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1524 (4th Cir. 1992).
Materiality is a question for the court. —
Whether a representation is made and the terms on which it is made are questions of fact for the jury, but, when proved, its materiality is a question for the court. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923); Inter-Ocean Ins. Co. v. Harkrader, 193 Va. 96 , 67 S.E.2d 894, 1951 Va. LEXIS 243 (1951); Scott v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 202 Va. 579 , 118 S.E.2d 519, 1961 Va. LEXIS 148 (1961); Chitwood v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 206 Va. 314 , 143 S.E.2d 915, 1965 Va. LEXIS 200 (1965); Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. GEICO, 207 Va. 944 , 154 S.E.2d 173, 1967 Va. LEXIS 160 (1967); Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Echols, 207 Va. 949 , 154 S.E.2d 169, 1967 Va. LEXIS 161 (1967); Harrell v. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co., 215 Va. 829 , 213 S.E.2d 792, 1975 Va. LEXIS 234 (1975) (see Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724 (4th Cir. 1935)).
When a misrepresentation is proved, its materiality is a question of law for the court. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970).
Whether a statement is untrue is a question of fact for the jury, but when its falsity is proved, the question of materiality is for the court. Old Republic Life Ins. Co. v. Bales, 213 Va. 771 , 195 S.E.2d 854, 1973 Va. LEXIS 229 (1973); Gilmore v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 432 F. Supp. 35, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17347 (W.D. Va. 1977).
The materiality of a misrepresentation, if shown to have been made, is an issue of law to be decided by the courts. Parkerson v. Federal Home Life Ins. Co., 797 F. Supp. 1308, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18158 (E.D. Va. 1992).
B.Illustrative Cases.
Boilerplate language in policy not sufficient. —
A trial court did not err in holding that an insurer failed to meet its burden of proof on the question of materiality where the only evidence of materiality the insurer offered was the policy itself, which recited in boilerplate language that the representations in the application were material and which language it was assumed was included in every policy issued by the insurer. Such evidence was far from the clear proof required to show that truthful answers would have reasonably influenced the insurer’s decision to issue the policy to the insured. Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Hunt & Calderone, P.C., 261 Va. 38 , 540 S.E.2d 491, 2001 Va. LEXIS 19 (2001).
Recitation of correctness by insured increases burden on insurer. —
In the application submitted by the insured it was recited that his answers were correct to the best of his knowledge. Where there is such a recitation, the burden upon the insurance carrier increases from that specified in this section to clear proof that the answer is knowingly false. Old Republic Life Ins. Co. v. Bales, 213 Va. 771 , 195 S.E.2d 854, 1973 Va. LEXIS 229 (1973).
Insurance company was not estopped from relying on misrepresentations of material fact because insurance company continued to accept premium payments from plaintiff ’s husband for 21 months after insurance company’s agent was told by husband that he “had just realized he had been diagnosed” as having colon cancer. It could not be said, as a matter of law, that what agent said husband told him should have excited insurance company to inquire further. Further, plaintiff offered no evidence that husband prejudicially relied on any act or inaction of insurance company. Parkerson v. Federal Home Life Ins. Co., 797 F. Supp. 1308, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18158 (E.D. Va. 1992).
Warranty that car was new was material. —
Where a policy of insurance on an automobile contained a warranty that the car was a new one, it was error to refuse to instruct that the warranty was material and that plaintiff could not recover if in fact the car was not new. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
As was warranty of automobile number. —
In the instant case, an action on an insurance policy against loss by fire and theft of an automobile, the warranties were that the factory number of the automobile insured was 87382, and that it was new when purchased. Plaintiff contended that this section destroyed the effect of all such warranties. It was held that it appears from the language used in the section that it had no application to the instant case, as it was clearly proven that the answer or statement as to the number of the automobile and that it was new were material to the risk assumed and were untrue. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
In an action upon an automobile insurance policy, an instruction that if the jury believed from the evidence that the motor number of plaintiff’s automobile was 87382 and that he represented to the defendant this number as the factory number of the automobile, instead of the motor number, then such representation is not material, was error. North River Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 137 Va. 313 , 119 S.E. 46 , 1923 Va. LEXIS 158 (1923).
Of ownership. —
In the instant case, an action against an indemnity company on an automobile insurance policy, the statements in the application as to the ownership of the car were material and untrue. Therefore, this section did not govern the case. The title was clouded by a conditional sales contract, and the one stated to be the owner of the car was not the owner. The answer as to ownership was material to the risk and was untrue, and these untrue statements would have been sufficient to have invalidated the policy but for the fact that defendant’s agent who secured the policy knew that these statements were untrue. Moreover, when the company sent its agent to adjust the troubles attendant upon a transfer of the title, it must have known what these troubles were. Royal Indem. Co. v. Hook, 155 Va. 956 , 157 S.E. 414 , 1931 Va. LEXIS 278 (1931).
Materiality of a misrepresentation as to ownership of an automobile must be clearly proved by the insurer, and materiality will not be assumed or judicially noticed in the absence of such proof. Scott v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 202 Va. 579 , 118 S.E.2d 519, 1961 Va. LEXIS 148 (1961).
That beneficiary was insured’s wife. —
In a written application for insurance, where the insured is asked to give the name, relationship and residence of the beneficiary, and he states in reply that the beneficiary is his wife, and it turns out that she is not his wife but a woman with whom he is living in illicit cohabitation, such false statement with respect to his relation to the beneficiary avoids the policy. Continental Cas. Co. v. Lindsay, 111 Va. 389 , 69 S.E. 344 , 1910 Va. LEXIS 57 (1910).
Concealment of physical condition and prior refusal of insurance. —
Where, prior to the issuance of preferred accident and health policy, the insured had been twice refused insurance, had undergone an operation for appendicitis, and had been suffering from effects of a vascular disease in his legs, but he made no disclosure of these facts in his application, his representations were untrue and material to the risk, when assumed, and if correct information had been disclosed in his application the policy would not have been issued. Consequently, the insurer, to protect itself against the failure to disclose such material information, had the right to void the policy and return the premiums paid. Inter-Ocean Ins. Co. v. Harkrader, 193 Va. 96 , 67 S.E.2d 894, 1951 Va. LEXIS 243 (1951).
Concealment of psychiatric treatment. —
A false statement concealing the fact that the applicant was being treated for a psychiatric disorder was proven to be material to the risk. Fidelity Bankers Life Ins. Corp. v. Wheeler, 203 Va. 434 , 125 S.E.2d 151, 1962 Va. LEXIS 164 (1962).
Concealment of treatment for nervous disorder. —
In a case in which suicide was charged, a false concealment as to a treatment by a physician for a nervous disorder was material to the risk. Flannagan v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., 152 Va. 38 , 146 S.E. 353 , 1929 Va. LEXIS 151 (1929), overruled, Gilley v. Union Life Ins. Co., 194 Va. 966 , 76 S.E.2d 165, 1953 Va. LEXIS 165 (1953) (see Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co. v. Clemmer, 79 F.2d 724, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (4th Cir. 1935). But see Williams v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 139 Va. 341 , 123 S.E. 509 , 1924 Va. LEXIS 111 (1924), wherein it was said that where the insured did not disclose the fact that she had had a cancer and was not asked about it by the insurer, the insured was not bound to tell the medical examiner what she knew about a cancer, and there were no representations or statements of insured in the evidence which it could be said were material to the risk when examined and were not true, within this section).
Concealment of consumption. —
The statements of the assured were shot through with fraud. There had been a material change in his weight, which, in his statement, he denied. He was not last sick in 1928, as he stated; his last illness had been for more than a week, as he stated; he had left his work for more than a month on account of illness, though he said he had not; he had consulted physicians other than the physician named by him, and he had within the last five years been to a sanatorium for treatment, which he denied in his statement. He had consumption and he knew it. All of these statements were material to the risk assumed and barred a recovery upon the policy under this section unless the insurance company was estopped to rely upon them. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hart, 162 Va. 88 , 173 S.E. 769 , 1934 Va. LEXIS 236 (1934).
Concealment of terminal illness leading to imminent death was material to the risk assumed by an insurance carrier; thus, the district court’s conclusion that leukemia victim and his ex-wife had fraudulently misrepresented the state of his health in both the insurance application and the application for reinstatement was clearly correct. Nyonteh v. Peoples Sec. Life Ins. Co., 958 F.2d 42, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1524 (4th Cir. 1992).
Concealment of claims on prior policies. —
The failure of an applicant for an accident and health insurance policy to recall some minor payment made upon an accident policy in another company would not be material to the risk assumed, but if an applicant in the preceding nine years had made on other accident and health policies eleven claims, certainly such information would be important. It would tend to show either that the making of claims was a habit or that misfortune had dogged his footsteps. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Ratcliffe, 163 Va. 325 , 175 S.E. 870 , 1934 Va. LEXIS 187 (1934).
Concealment of prior professional liability claims. —
Grant of summary judgment awarded in favor of an insured in an insurer’s suit pursuant to § 38.2-309 to rescind a professional liability policy was reversed because the insured neglected to mention that 500 claims had been filed against it by nonclients when answering an unambiguous question concerning professional liability claims, which encompassed claims brought by clients and nonclients, and the omission was material because the insurer would not have extended coverage if it had known of those claims. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Draper & Goldberg, P.L.L.C., 138 Fed. Appx. 542, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13691 (4th Cir. 2005) (reversing Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Draper & Goldberg, PLLC, 369 F. Supp. 2d 659, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27861 (E.D. Va. 2004)).
Concealment of law firm misappropriation from clients. —
Insurer was entitled to rescind a professional liability policy issued to a law firm where the partner who signed the policy application on behalf of the firm failed to reveal the partner’s own misappropriation of client funds, as such misconduct was clearly material to the decision to renew the policy; a policy provision for cancellation in the event of a misrepresentation in the application did not eliminate the insurer’s right of rescission. TIG Ins. Co. v. Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, LLP, No. 1:01CV00143, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1481 (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2003), aff'd, 116 Fed. Appx. 423, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24058 (4th Cir. 2004).
Concealment of former criminal defendant client’s potential malpractice claim. —
Insurer was granted summary judgment on its claim seeking to rescind a lawyers professional liability insurance policy where the law firm and attorneys knew that their former criminal defendant client had been convicted of several sexual assault-type claims against his children, that he had petitioned for and was granted a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel, and that he had received a judgment of acquittal upon retrial, prior to applying for professional liability insurance, an affidavit from the insurer’s director of underwriting for lawyers established that the insurer would not have issued the policy in the absence of the misrepresentation, and as a result, the law firm and attorneys had a basis to believe that their former client might have reasonably been expected to assert claims of malpractice against them at the time they completed the application for the lawyers professional liability insurance policy. Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Graham & Schewe, 339 F. Supp. 2d 723, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20561 (E.D. Va. 2004).
False statement of occupation. —
Where the assured in his application said that he was a lawyer, whereas in fact he was at that time in the forbidden railway service as a railroad conductor or brakeman, he warranted his answer as to occupation and made it part of the policy, and it was material to the risk, untrue, and made the contract voidable from its inception. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. v. Massey, 159 Va. 832 , 164 S.E. 529 , 1932 Va. LEXIS 224 (1932), different results reached on reh'g, 159 Va. 832 , 167 S.E. 248 (1933).
Representation of occupation held not false. —
The occupation of the insured in an accident policy was that of contractor, whose chief duty was to supervise the work of his servants in brick construction, although he sometimes actually laid bricks, for the purpose of showing inexpert bricklayers how the work was to be done. It was held that his representation that the duties of his occupation were fully described as “Proprietor — supervising only” was not a false representation which induced the company to give him a preferred classification. He was, in fact, a preferred risk, and received the classification to which he was entitled. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Walker, 127 Va. 140 , 102 S.E. 585 , 1920 Va. LEXIS 40 (1920).
Misrepresentation of other insurance held immaterial. —
An applicant for accident insurance declared that he had no other accident or sickness insurance as enumerated. The applicant failed to mention that he was a member of a social club, the members of which, among other privileges, were entitled to a weekly sick benefit of $4, and to report that his wife, without his knowledge, had subsequently taken out a weekly sick benefit policy of $5 a week in another company. It was held that under this section, these omissions of the applicant, without any willful purpose to deceive or defraud the company, did not avoid the policy so far as death from accident was concerned. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Walker, 127 Va. 140 , 102 S.E. 585 , 1920 Va. LEXIS 40 (1920).
Witnesses. —
Since the agent had the authority to issue and did issue the binder, he was a competent witness to testify on the materiality question that he would have rejected the risk had he known the true facts. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Haywood, 211 Va. 394 , 177 S.E.2d 530, 1970 Va. LEXIS 258 (1970).
Misstatement held to be material as a matter of law. —
A misstatement was held to be material to the risk as a matter of law where uncontradicted testimony on behalf of defendant insurance company was to the effect that the policy would not have been issued except at a higher premium if the insurance company had known facts which were concealed by the misstatement. Fidelity Bankers Life Ins. Corp. v. Wheeler, 203 Va. 434 , 125 S.E.2d 151, 1962 Va. LEXIS 164 (1962).
Incorrect statement not material. —
Even if the named insured on an application was incorrect, that statement was not material to an insurer’s decision to issue insurance. Rather, it was apparent from the record that the insurer and its agents understood that an active and existing entity would be insured for operations relating to its pool sales, service, or maintenance, and that was the entity that performed those services, which had a similar name to the entity on the application, rather than an inactive entity that had a more similar name. Lott v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 827 F. Supp. 2d 626, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124790 (E.D. Va. 2011).
Insurer’s actions held to show false statement not regarded as material. —
Though its underwriting superintendent testified the policy would not have been issued had the true facts been known, the company’s actions (particularly its issuance of a new policy) after the accident was reported and after the falsity of the answer was known were held to show conclusively that it did not regard the false statement as material. Virginia Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 204 Va. 783 , 133 S.E.2d 277, 1963 Va. LEXIS 212 (1963).
IV.Effect of Acts of Agents.
Agent’s apparent authority to bind insurer. —
In a declaratory judgment action pursuant to § 8.01-184 , the trial court properly determined that an insurance company was required to provide coverage to a subcontractor; the insurance company failed to satisfy the standard set out in § 38.2-309 , because an insurance agent had apparent authority to bind the company, and the agent did not rely on alleged misrepresentations in an application in deciding to bind coverage. Montgomery Mut. Ins. Co. v. Riddle, 266 Va. 539 , 587 S.E.2d 513, 2003 Va. LEXIS 104 (2003).
Where agent inserts in application statements made by insured, and insured has knowledge of statements inserted, the insured is bound by the statements. If the statements are false and material the policy is defeated under this section. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Ratcliffe, 163 Va. 325 , 175 S.E. 870 , 1934 Va. LEXIS 187 (1934).
Where insured truthfully answers questions but insurance agent enters false answers in application and the insured acts without fraud, collusion or actual or constructive knowledge of agent’s act in supplying false answers, the insurer is precluded from avoiding liability on the grounds of falsity of answers in the application. Gilley v. Union Life Ins. Co., 194 Va. 966 , 76 S.E.2d 165, 1953 Va. LEXIS 165 (1953) (see New York Life Ins. Co. v. Eicher, 198 Va. 255 , 93 S.E.2d 269 (1956)).
Mere knowledge by an applicant that an agent is not putting down complete answers is not a defense to a suit on the policy, unless the evidence goes to show that the applicant knows that the agent in doing so is inserting false statements through mistake, neglect or fraud. There must be conduct upon the part of the applicant that amounts to a wrong. Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Ferebee, 202 Va. 556 , 118 S.E.2d 675, 1961 Va. LEXIS 143 (1961).
A plaintiff who has signed an application for insurance without reading it is not thereby precluded from proving that false answers contained in it were not given by her but were inserted by the insurance agent, she having given true answers and being unaware of their falsification. Gilley v. Union Life Ins. Co., 194 Va. 966 , 76 S.E.2d 165, 1953 Va. LEXIS 165 (1953).
The insurer in an action on an insurance policy cannot avoid liability on the ground that false answers appear in the application, if it is shown that: (1) the false answers contained in the application were inserted by an agent of the insurer, and (2) the answers to the interrogations contained in the application were truthfully given without fraud or collusion, and (3) the applicant had no knowledge, actual or constructive, that his application contained false answers. This rule applies even though the insurer attempts to limit the authority of its agent by stipulations inserted in the application and policy, and even though a copy of the application is attached to and made a part of the policy. But the existence of these facts should be taken into consideration with all the other facts and circumstances of the particular case in determining whether the applicant had any knowledge that the answers contained in the application were false. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Eicher, 198 Va. 255 , 93 S.E.2d 269, 1956 Va. LEXIS 200 (1956).
The insurer in an action on an insurance policy cannot avoid liability on the ground that false answers appear in the application, if it is shown that: (1) The false answers contained in the application were inserted by an agent of the insurer, and (2) the answers to the interrogations contained in the application were truthfully given without fraud or collusion, and (3) the applicant had no knowledge, actual or constructive, that his application contained false answers. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. v. Dingus, 219 Va. 706 , 250 S.E.2d 352, 1979 Va. LEXIS 162 (1979).
If the applicant is a party to the fraud or in collusion with the insurer’s agent or has actual or constructive knowledge that his application contains false answers material to the risk, neither he nor the beneficiary under the policy will be allowed to profit thereby and the insurer will not be estopped by the knowledge or conduct of its agent from asserting the falsity of such answers as a bar to its liability on the policy. Furthermore, in the absence of peculiar circumstances, there is a presumption that the applicant has read the application which he signed and he is prima facie charged with knowledge of its contents, but this presumption may be rebutted. To rebut the presumption that the insured knew his application contained false answers it is essential to prove that the answers to the interrogations contained in the application were truthfully given by the insured. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Eicher, 198 Va. 255 , 93 S.E.2d 269, 1956 Va. LEXIS 200 (1956).
Jury question as to applicant’s knowledge. —
Where insurance agent filled out an application for insurance and read each question aloud to the applicant and upon the applicant making oral answer thereto made a notation at the appropriate place in the application, and where the evidence was in dispute as to whether the applicant gave truthful oral answers to the questions propounded in the application, a jury question was presented as to whether at the time of applying for insurance the insured knew of certain physical disorders. Quillin v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 280 F.2d 771, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4089 (4th Cir. 1960).
Misrepresentation on application. —
Where attorney failed to acknowledge on a malpractice insurance application that attorney knew of a potential claim, i.e., that the attorney was, at the time, embezzling money from a trust, the insurer was able to rescind the policy when the lie was discovered. Westport Ins. Corp. v. Lydia S. Ulrich Testamentary Trust, 42 Fed. Appx. 578, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15354 (4th Cir. 2002).
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Misrepresentation on application. —
Insurer was not liable under an issued policy under circumstances in which its underwriter testified that the insurer did not know that a husband and a wife were married, that it thought the wife was single and lived alone, and that, had the insurer known the truth, it would not have issued the policy; § 38.2-309 placed no burden on the insurer to conduct an investigation. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fondufe, 73 Va. Cir. 338, 2007 Va. Cir. LEXIS 98 (Fairfax County May 9, 2007).
Insurer’s request for a declaratory judgment was granted and the insurance policy was declared void ab initio due to defendant’s material misrepresentations in the application process because had the insurer known the airplane was housed in Florida, the policy would not have issued, as the vice president of underwriting had initiated a block on all new policies for planes housed in Florida until a hurricane passed; had the insurer been aware that there was no current airworthiness certificate, then it would not have agreed to provide coverage for defendant’s airplane; and the misrepresentations did more than just reasonably influence consideration by the insurer, they were the actual difference in getting the policy issued. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Abruzzino, 99 Va. Cir. 492, 2018 Va. Cir. LEXIS 229 (Shenandoah County Aug. 28, 2018).
§ 38.2-310. All fees, charges, etc., to be stated in policy.
- All fees, charges, premiums or other consideration charged for the insurance or for the procurement of insurance shall be stated in the policy except in the case of fidelity, surety, title, and group insurance, and except for consulting services as provided in Article 4 (§ 38.2-1837 et seq.) of Chapter 18 of this title. Except as provided in this subsection, no person shall charge or receive any fee, compensation, or consideration for insurance or for the procurement of insurance that is not included in the premium or stated in the policy.
- Service charges for installment payments of insurance premiums do not need to be stated in the policy if the charges are provided to the insured in writing.
History. Code 1950, § 38-508; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-337; 1986, c. 562; 1990, c. 281.
§ 38.2-311. Type size in which conditions and restrictions to be printed.
Except as otherwise provided in this title, no restriction, condition or provision in or endorsed on any insurance policy shall be valid unless the condition or provision is printed in type as large as eight point type, or is written in ink or typewritten in or on the policy. This section shall not apply to a copy of an application or parts thereof, attached to or made part of an insurance policy.
History. Code 1950, § 38-9; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-338; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 19.
CASE NOTES
Constitutionality. —
The provisions of this section relating to the size of type are constitutional. Dupuy v. Delaware Ins. Co., 63 F. 680, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2992 (C.C.D. Va. 1894).
The object of this section is a wise and beneficent one to protect applicants for insurance who are oftentimes inexperienced and unacquainted with the provisions and stipulations usual in policies of insurance, by requiring that such conditions and restrictive provisions shall not constitute a defense unless they are printed in the policy in type of prescribed size. It does not forbid companies to protect themselves by the insertion of conditions, limitations, and restrictions upon their liability, for men usually have the right to contract as they please about their own affairs. If printed in small type these restrictive provisions might easily escape the observation of the unwary, and it has therefore been wisely ordered that they, and not the policy, shall be nugatory unless printed in type of such size as would challenge the attention and be easily read by the ordinary applicant. Sulphur Mines Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., 94 Va. 355 , 26 S.E. 856 , 1897 Va. LEXIS 83 (1897).
“Conditions” and “restrictive provisions.” —
The words “condition” and “restrictive provision,” used in this section before the 1952 act, which substituted therefor “restriction, condition or provision,” were intended to cover any clause, expression or provision, included in or appended to a policy, whereby the effect of the principal and essential part of the policy is modified, changed, restricted, or otherwise affected, so as to materially influence the rights and liabilities of the insured thereunder. National Life Ass'n v. Berkeley, 97 Va. 571 , 34 S.E. 469 , 1899 Va. LEXIS 72 (1899).
Before the 1952 act, this section specified “conditions” and “restrictive provisions,” which would impose upon the insured the performance of some function the nonperformance of which would defeat a recovery in an action on the policy, provided such “condition” or “restrictive provision” was printed in type of the size required, or was written with pen and ink. Stipulations with respect to the risks insured against, which imposed no onus on the insured, and with respect to which he could not be guilty of any act of omission or commission which could affect his right of recovery, where held not within the statute. Cline v. Western Assurance Co., 101 Va. 496 , 44 S.E. 700 , 1903 Va. LEXIS 57 (1903).
Section does not apply to bylaws of mutual benefit societies. —
This section has no application to the conditions and restrictive provisions contained in the bylaws of an ordinary mutual benefit society made a part of the certificate of membership, which is the contract between it and the member. Fraternities Accident Order v. Armstrong, 106 Va. 746 , 56 S.E. 565 , 1907 Va. LEXIS 142 (1907).
But may apply to application. —
The provision of this section in regard to size of type applies to both application and policy when the application is expressly made a part of the contract of insurance. Burruss v. National Life Ass'n, 96 Va. 543 , 32 S.E. 49 , 1899 Va. LEXIS 99 (1899).
Whole of provision must fulfill requirements. —
The requirement of this section is not satisfied by inserting a figure, word or even a sentence with pen and ink. The whole provision relied on must be in writing or type of the prescribed size, or else it is not available as a defense to an action on the policy. National Life Ass'n v. Berkeley, 97 Va. 571 , 34 S.E. 469 , 1899 Va. LEXIS 72 (1899).
Beneficiary disclaiming and claiming under a provision simultaneously. —
Where an insurance company is seeking to escape liability for the surrender value of its policy on the ground that the policy was not surrendered within the time prescribed by a provision of the policy, it is not inequitable for the beneficiary, while claiming the surrender value under that same provision, to insist that the time limit fixed by the provision shall be excluded because not printed in type of the required size nor written with pen and ink in or on the policy. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y v. Wilson, 110 Va. 571 , 66 S.E. 836 , 1910 Va. LEXIS 96 (1910).
When objection to be raised. —
An objection that the conditions of an insurance policy are not printed in the type required by the statute cannot be made for the first time in the appellate court. The company was allowed to rely on the conditions in the policy which rendered it void, and the record fails to disclose that the conditions were not printed in the type prescribed by the statute. Hence, the presumption is that the policy conformed to the statutory requirement. Sulphur Mines Co. v. Phenix Ins. Co., 94 Va. 355 , 26 S.E. 856 , 1897 Va. LEXIS 83 (1897).
Admissibility of application not part of insurance contract. —
Contention that since printed words on application for insurance were in six point type instead of eight point, the application should not have been admitted in evidence by virtue of this section was without merit, where the application did not become a part of an insurance contract or a restriction therein. Peoples Life Ins. Co. v. Parker, 179 Va. 662 , 20 S.E.2d 485, 1942 Va. LEXIS 261 (1942).
A jury’s verdict as to size of type will be set aside where a different measurement is shown by a recognized device for measuring the size of type. Spicer v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 171 Va. 428 , 199 S.E. 499 , 1938 Va. LEXIS 295 (1938).
§ 38.2-312. Provisions limiting jurisdiction, or requiring construction of contracts by law of other states, prohibited.
No insurance contract delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth and covering subjects which are located or residing in this Commonwealth, or which are performed in this Commonwealth shall contain any condition, stipulation or agreement:
- Requiring the contract to be construed according to the laws of any other state or country, except as may be necessary to meet the requirements of the motor vehicle financial responsibility laws of the other state or country; or
-
Depriving the courts of this Commonwealth of jurisdiction in actions against the insurer.
Any such condition, stipulation or agreement shall be void, but such voiding shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the contract.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-339; 1986, c. 562.
Cross references.
As to binding arbitration provisions in home protection company contracts, notwithstanding the provisions of § 38.2-312 , see § 38.2-2616 .
CASE NOTES
Purpose of this section is different from that of the long arm statute. —
August v. HBA Life Ins. Co., 734 F.2d 168, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22589 (4th Cir. 1984).
Arbitration provisions. —
Where an insured entered into a Reinsurance Participation Agreement (RPA) with an insurer, which contained a mandatory arbitration provision, and where the insured sued alleging that the RPA was an insurance contract and thus, that the insurer engaged in business without complying with Virginia insurance law, a district court properly denied the insurer’s motion under the FAA to compel arbitration because Virginia law rendered void delegation provisions in putative insurance contracts; at least to the extent such provisions authorized an arbitrator to resolve whether the contract at issue constituted an insurance contract. Minnieland Private Day Sch., Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assur. Co., 867 F.3d 449, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14916 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 926, 200 L. Ed. 2d 203, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 851 (2018).
Reinsurance participation agreement is an insurance contract. —
Where a workers’ compensation insurer appealed a district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration, reinsurance participation agreement with the insured was an insurance contract for purposes of § 38.2-312 , which rendered void arbitration clauses contained in insurance contracts. Minnieland Private Day Sch., Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assur. Co., 913 F.3d 409, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 1188 (4th Cir. 2019).
§ 38.2-313. Where certain contracts deemed made.
All insurance contracts on or with respect to the ownership, maintenance or use of property in this Commonwealth shall be deemed to have been made in and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of this Commonwealth.
History. Code 1950, § 38-162; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-340; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Place of contract governs nature, validity, and interpretation. —
The nature, validity, and interpretation of a contract is governed by the law of the place where the contract was made. National Indep. Coal Operators Ass'n v. Old Republic Ins. Co., 544 F. Supp. 520, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13763 (W.D. Va. 1982).
State where the contract was made. —
Pursuant to § 38.2-313 , because an insurance contract with respect to the ownership, maintenance or use of property was involved, a court applied Virginia law for purposes of interpreting a “care, custody, or control exclusion.” Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 518 F. Supp. 2d 803, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71446 (W.D. Va. 2007).
Insurance contract. —
Coverage under an insurance policy did not exist for fire damage to a building owned by a subsidiary of an insured limited liability company because the policy’s coverage-extension provision for newly acquired buildings could not be fairly read to apply to the property of a newly acquired subsidiary that was neither a named, nor an additional insured on the policy. Erie Ins. Exch. v. EPC MD 15, LLC, 297 Va. 21 , 822 S.E.2d 351, 2019 Va. LEXIS 2 (2019).
§ 38.2-314. Limitation of action and proof of loss.
No provision in any insurance policy shall be valid if it limits the time within which an action may be brought to less than one year after the loss occurs or the cause of action accrues.
If an insurance policy requires a proof of loss, damage or liability to be filed within a specified time, all time consumed in an effort to adjust the claim shall not be considered part of such time.
History. Code 1950, § 38-9; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-341; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 61.
CASE NOTES
Section applies to policies as to which limitations are not specifically provided. —
It seems reasonably clear that the function of this section is to provide a limitation upon the minimum time for bringing suit on policies as to which limitations are not specifically provided, and in such cases the policy may limit the time to not less than one year after the loss or after the cause of action accrues, as the policy may provide. Ramsey v. Home Ins. Co., 203 Va. 502 , 125 S.E.2d 201, 1962 Va. LEXIS 175 (1962).
And does not affect rule as to fire policies conforming to § 38.2-2105 . —
This section does not affect the rule that the twelve-month limitation contained in a fire policy conforming with § 38.2-2105 begins to run at the time of the loss rather than 60 days after proof of loss. Ramsey v. Home Ins. Co., 203 Va. 502 , 125 S.E.2d 201, 1962 Va. LEXIS 175 (1962).
First sentence applies to policies in force when section adopted. —
The declaration that no provision in any policy of insurance limiting the time within which a suit or action may be brought to less than one year after loss shall be valid applies not only to policies thereafter issued, but also to policies in force when the act was passed and upon which a right of action had not accrued. Smith v. Northern Neck Mut. Fire Ass'n, 112 Va. 192 , 70 S.E. 482 , 1911 Va. LEXIS 70 (1911).
Section inapplicable to policy with valid limitations period. —
Additional insured’s argument that the limitations period in an inland marine policy was invalid or tolled was rejected. Where the policy contained a valid limitations period of not less than one year from the date the named insured became aware of the loss, and there was no proviso that the insurer reserved a specified time to adjust the claim after the proof of loss was to be filed, neither sentence in § 38.2-314 applied. United Leasing Corp. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., No. 3:02CV200, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13069 (E.D. Va. June 8, 2002).
Applicability to ERISA claims. —
Plaintiff’s action challenging the termination of her disability benefits was governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and therefore the disability policy’s limitations period of three years was valid under § 38.2-314 ; because plaintiff’s claim was filed more than three years after the cause of action accrued, plaintiff’s claim was time-barred. Mirabile v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 2:06cv573, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42999 (E.D. Va. June 12, 2007), aff'd, 293 Fed. Appx. 213, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18079 (4th Cir. 2008).
One-year limitation period in group health plan contract had to be enforced as a valid contractual provision which violated no state or federal public policy. Koonan v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 802 F. Supp. 1424, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15620 (E.D. Va. 1992).
Appropriate limitations period for insurance contracts. —
Section 38.2-314 , not § 8.01-246(2) , dictates the appropriate limitations period for insurance contracts. Section 38.2-314 sets the minimum limitations period allowed in Virginia for filing suit on an insurance contract at one year. Mirabile v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 293 Fed. Appx. 213, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18079 (4th Cir. 2008).
Filing proof of loss. —
This section and § 38.2-320 do not change the rule adopted in North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. Edmundson , 104 Va. 486 , 52 S.E. 350 (1905), to the effect that failure to file proof of loss within the time specified in the policy does not bar an action on the policy if the proof of loss is filed before suit is brought. Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Bowers, 157 Va. 686 , 161 S.E. 914 , 1932 Va. LEXIS 321 (1932).
§ 38.2-315. Intervening breach.
If any breach of warranty or condition in any insurance contract covering property located in this Commonwealth occurs prior to a loss under the contract, the breach shall not void the contract nor permit the insurer to avoid liability unless the breach existed at the time of the loss.
History. Code 1950, § 38-8; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-342; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 17 M.J. Statutes, § 90.
§ 38.2-316. Policy forms to be filed with Commission; notice of approval or disapproval; exceptions.
- No policy of life insurance, industrial life insurance, variable life insurance, modified guaranteed life insurance, group life insurance, accident and sickness insurance, or group accident and sickness insurance; no annuity, modified guaranteed annuity, pure endowment, variable annuity, group annuity, group modified guaranteed annuity, or group variable annuity contract; no health services plan, legal services plan, dental or optometric services plan, or health maintenance organization contract; no dental plan organization dental benefit contract; and no fraternal benefit certificate nor any certificate or evidence of coverage issued in connection with such policy, contract, or plan issued or issued for delivery in Virginia shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth unless a copy of the form has been filed with the Commission. In addition to the above requirement, no policy of accident and sickness insurance shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth unless the rate manual showing rates, rules, and classification of risks applicable thereto has been filed with the Commission.
- Except as provided in this section, no application form shall be used with the policy or contract and no rider or endorsement shall be attached to or printed or stamped upon the policy or contract unless the form of such application, rider or endorsement has been filed with the Commission. No individual certificate and no enrollment form shall be used in connection with any group life insurance policy, group accident and sickness insurance policy, group annuity contract, or group variable annuity contract unless the form for the certificate and enrollment form have been filed with the Commission.
-
- None of the policies, contracts, and certificates specified in subsection A of this section shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth and no applications, enrollment forms, riders, and endorsements shall be used in connection with the policies, contracts, and certificates unless the forms thereof have been approved in writing by the Commission as conforming to the requirements of this title and not inconsistent with law. C. 1. None of the policies, contracts, and certificates specified in subsection A of this section shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth and no applications, enrollment forms, riders, and endorsements shall be used in connection with the policies, contracts, and certificates unless the forms thereof have been approved in writing by the Commission as conforming to the requirements of this title and not inconsistent with law.
- In addition to the above requirement, no premium rate change applicable to individual accident and sickness insurance policies, subscriber contracts of health services plans, dental or optometric services plans, or fraternal benefit contracts providing individual accident and sickness coverage as authorized in § 38.2-4116 shall be used unless the premium rate change has been approved in writing by the Commission. No premium rate change applicable to individual or group Medicare supplement policies shall be used unless the premium rate change has been approved in writing by the Commission.
-
The Commission may disapprove or withdraw approval of the form of any policy, contract or certificate specified in subsection A of this section, or of any application, enrollment form, rider or endorsement, if the form:
- Does not comply with the laws of this Commonwealth;
- Has any title, heading, backing or other indication of the contents of any or all of its provisions that is likely to mislead the policyholder, contract holder or certificate holder; or
- Contains any provisions that encourage misrepresentation or are misleading, deceptive or contrary to the public policy of this Commonwealth.
- Within 30 days after the filing of any form requiring approval, the Commission shall notify the organization filing the form of its approval or disapproval of the form which has been filed, and, in the event of disapproval, its reason therefor. The Commission, at its discretion, may extend for up to an additional 30 days the period within which it shall approve or disapprove the form. Any form received but neither approved nor disapproved by the Commission shall be deemed approved at the expiration of the 30 days if the period is not extended, or at the expiration of the extended period, if any; however, no organization shall use a form deemed approved under the provisions of this section until the organization has filed with the Commission a written notice of its intent to use the form together with a copy of the form and the original transmittal letter thereof. The notice shall be filed in the offices of the Commission at least 10 days prior to the organization’s use of the form.
- If the Commission proposes to withdraw approval previously given or deemed given to the form of any policy, contract or certificate, or of any application, rider or endorsement, it shall notify the insurer in writing at least 15 days prior to the proposed effective date of withdrawal giving its reasons for withdrawal.
- Any insurer or fraternal benefit society aggrieved by the disapproval or withdrawal of approval of any form may proceed as indicated in § 38.2-1926 .
- This section shall not apply to any special rider or endorsement on any policy, except an accident and sickness insurance policy that relates only to the manner of distribution of benefits or to the reservation of rights and benefits under such policy, and that is used at the request of the individual policyholder, contract holder or certificate holder.
- The Commission may exempt any categories of such policies, contracts, and certificates and any applicable rate manuals from (i) the filing requirements, (ii) the approval requirements of this section, or (iii) both such requirements. The Commission may modify such requirements, subject to such limitations and conditions which the Commission finds appropriate. In promulgating an exemption, the Commission may consider the nature of the coverage, the person or persons to be insured or covered, the competence of the buyer or other parties to the contract, and other criteria the Commission considers relevant.
- In lieu of complying with the requirements of subsections A, B, and C, any legal services organization operating, conducting, or administering a legal services plan may provide the Commission with an informational filing regarding a subscription contract, enrollment form, rider, or endorsement used by the legal services organization in connection with a legal services plan offered in the Commonwealth together with written notice of its intent to use the form. Upon providing such informational filing and notice, the legal services organization may use the subscription contract, enrollment form, rider, or endorsement without its prior approval by the Commission. This subsection shall not limit the authority of the Commission to review a legal services plan and any subscription contract, enrollment form, rider, or endorsement used in connection therewith and to disapprove the use of such form for any of the grounds set forth in subsection D.
- Pursuant to the authority granted by § 38.2-223 , the Commission may promulgate such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary to set standards for policy and other form submissions required by this section or § 38.2-3501 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-342.1; 1972, c. 836; 1973, c. 504; 1977, c. 325; 1986, c. 562; 1990, c. 332; 1994, c. 316; 1996, c. 12; 1998, c. 17; 2004, c. 668; 2020, c. 408.
Cross references.
As to filing and approval of viatical settlement contracts, see § 38.2-6003 .
The 1998 amendment, in the second sentence of subsection B, inserted “and no enrollment form,” and substituted “and enrollment form have been filed” for “has been filed”; in subdivision 1 of subsection C, inserted “enrollment forms”; and in the introductory language of subsection D, inserted “enrollment form.”
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendment by c. 668 inserted “no dental plan organization dental benefit contract” in subsection A; substituted “30 days” for “thirty days” three times and “10 days” for “ten days” once in subsection E; and substituted “15 days” for “fifteen days” in subsection F.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 408 inserted subsection J and redesignated accordingly.
CASE NOTES
Breach of warranty must exist at time of loss. —
The Virginia law today is in accord with the common-law doctrine that a breach of a material warranty in an insurance policy will defeat recovery, with the exception that, under the Virginia rule, the breach of warranty must exist at the time the loss occurs. Coleman Furn. Corp. v. Home Ins. Co., 67 F.2d 347, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465 (4th Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 291 U.S. 669, 54 S. Ct. 453, 78 L. Ed. 1059, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 620 (1934).
But it is unnecessary to prove breach contributed to loss. —
This section makes it unnecessary for the insurance company to prove that the breach of the warranty contributed to the loss, and under the Virginia rule, as under the federal rule, breach of a material warranty will defeat recovery of the insurance policy whether contributing to the loss or not. Coleman Furn. Corp. v. Home Ins. Co., 67 F.2d 347, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465 (4th Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 291 U.S. 669, 54 S. Ct. 453, 78 L. Ed. 1059, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 620 (1934).
§ 38.2-316.1. Premium rates.
- As used in this section:“Anticipated loss ratio” means the ratio of the present value of the future benefits to the present value of the future premiums of a policy form over the entire period for which rates are computed to provide coverage.“Student health insurance coverage” means a type of individual health insurance coverage offered in the individual market that is provided pursuant to a written agreement between an institution of higher education, as defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965, P.L. 89-329, and a health carrier to students enrolled in that institution of higher education and their dependents; that does not make health insurance coverage available other than in connection with enrollment as a student or as a dependent of a student in the institution of higher education; and that does not condition eligibility for health insurance coverage on any health status-related factor related to a student or a dependent of the student.
- The Commission shall review and approve accident and sickness insurance premium rates applicable to (i) health benefit plans issued in the Commonwealth in the individual and small group markets, as those terms are defined in § 38.2-3431 , and (ii) health benefit plans providing health insurance coverage, as defined in § 38.2-3431 , in the individual market to residents of the Commonwealth through a group trust, association, purchasing cooperative, or other group that is not an employer plan. In connection therewith, the Commission is authorized to establish minimum loss ratios to assure that the benefits provided by accident and sickness insurance policies are or are likely to be reasonable in relation to the premiums charged. The Commission shall promulgate regulations to establish standards applicable to such review and approval.
- Premium rate filings for a health benefit plan issued in the Commonwealth in the individual and small group markets shall include a description of agent commissions and any limitations or exceptions as they relate to the payment of such commissions.
- Every policy, rider, or endorsement form affecting benefits that is submitted for approval shall be accompanied by a rate filing, as required by § 38.2-316 . Any subsequent addition to or change in rates applicable to such policy, rider, or endorsement form shall also be filed. Each rate submission shall comply with the requirements of 14VAC5-130.
- Benefits shall be deemed reasonable in relation to premiums, provided that the anticipated loss ratio of the policy form, including riders and endorsements, is at least as great as provided in 14VAC5-130. The reasonableness of benefits with respect to filings of rate revisions for a previously approved form shall be determined as provided in 14VAC5-130.
- A health insurance issuer shall consider the claims experience of all enrollees in all health benefit plans, other than grandfathered plans and student health insurance coverage, in the individual market to be members of a single risk pool. A health insurance issuer shall consider the claims experience of all enrollees in all health plans, other than grandfathered plans, in the small group market to be members of a single risk pool. Each plan year or policy year, as applicable, a health insurance issuer shall establish an index rate based on the total combined claims costs for providing essential health benefits within the single risk pool of the individual or small group market as provided in 14VAC5-130. A health insurance issuer may vary premium rates for a particular plan from its index rate for a relevant state market only on the basis of an actuarially justified plan-specific factor permitted under 14VAC5-130.
- If the Commission finds that the premium rate filed in accordance with this section is not meeting or will not meet the originally filed and approved loss ratio, the Commission may require appropriate rate adjustments, premium refunds, or premium credits (i) as deemed necessary for the coverage to conform with the minimum loss ratio standards established pursuant to subsection B and (ii) that are expected to result in a loss ratio at least as great as that originally anticipated in the rates used to produce current rates by the health insurance issuer for the coverage. The Commission may take into consideration any previous or expected premium refunds or credits. The Commission may require the submission of detailed supporting documents as necessary to justify the adjustment.
- The Commission may request information subsequent to approval of a policy form or rate revision so that it may determine whether premium rates are reasonable in relation to the benefits provided as specified in 14VAC5-130.
- Except as otherwise provided, nothing contained in this section shall be construed to relieve a health insurance issuer from complying with other statutory requirements set forth in this title.
- The Commission may prescribe procedures for the effective monitoring of actual experience under any form subject to 14VAC5-130.
History. 2013, cc. 670, 679; 2018, c. 708; 2019, c. 607.
The 2018 amendments.
The 2018 amendment by c. 708 designated the existing provisions as subsection A, added subsection B, and made a stylistic change.
The 2019 amendments.
The 2019 amendment by c. 607 added subsections A and D through J and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in subsection B, inserted the second sentence.
§ 38.2-317. Delivery and use of certain policies and endorsements.
- No insurance policy or endorsement of the kind to which Chapter 19 (§ 38.2-1900 et seq.) applies shall be delivered or issued for delivery in the Commonwealth unless the policy form or endorsement is filed with the Commission prior to its effective date. The provisions of this section shall not apply to statutory fire insurance policies, standard automobile policy forms and endorsements, workers’ compensation and employers’ liability insurance as defined in § 38.2-119 , surety insurance as defined in § 38.2-121 , or insurance of large commercial risks as defined in § 38.2-1903.1 .
-
The Commission may disapprove or withdraw approval of the policy form or endorsement to which the section applies if the policy form or endorsement:
- Is in violation of any provision of this title;
- Contains provisions that are contrary to the public policy of this Commonwealth;
- Contains or incorporates by reference, even where such incorporation is otherwise permissible, any inconsistent, ambiguous, or misleading clauses or exceptions and conditions that deceptively affect the risk purported to be assumed in the general coverage of the policy;
- Has any title, heading, or other indication of its provisions that is misleading;
- Contains provisions that are so unclear or deceptively worded that they encourage misrepresentation; or
- Provides coverage of such a limited nature that it is contrary to the public interest of the Commonwealth.
- No policy form or endorsement specified in subsection A shall be delivered, issued for delivery, or used in the Commonwealth unless the policy form or endorsement has been approved in writing by the Commission as conforming to the requirements of this title and not inconsistent with law. Within 30 days after the filing of any policy form or endorsement requiring approval pursuant to this section, the Commission shall notify the insurer or rate service organization filing the policy form or endorsement of its approval or disapproval, and in the event of disapproval, its reason therefor. The Commission, at its discretion, may extend for up to an additional 30 days the period within which it shall approve or disapprove the policy form or endorsement. Any policy form or endorsement received but neither approved nor disapproved by the Commission shall be deemed approved at the expiration of the 30 days if the period is not extended, or at the expiration of the extended period, if any; however, no policy form or endorsement shall be deemed approved under the provisions of this section unless written notice of the intent to use the policy form or endorsement has been filed with the Commission.
- If the Commission proposes to withdraw approval previously given or deemed given to the policy form or endorsement to which this section applies, it shall notify the insurer in writing at least ninety days prior to the proposed effective date of withdrawal giving its reasons for withdrawal.
- The policy and endorsement forms referred to in subsection A of this section in use on October 1, 1976, may continue to be used, subject to disapproval by the Commission.
- The Commission may by rule exempt any person, class of persons, or market segment from any or all of the provisions of this section. In promulgating an exemption, the Commission may consider the nature of the coverage, the person or persons to be insured or covered, the competence of the buyer or other parties to the contract, and other criteria the Commission considers relevant.
- The policy and endorsement forms referred to in subsection A of this section shall be open to public inspection. Copies may be obtained by any person on request and upon payment of a reasonable charge for the copies.
- Any insurer whose rate service organization files on behalf of such insurer shall notify the Commission prior to the effective date of any filing if the insurer is not going to accept the filing made on its behalf.
- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in subsection A, the provisions of this section shall apply to policies and endorsements of credit involuntary unemployment insurance, as defined in § 38.2-122.1 , and to policies and endorsements of credit property insurance, as defined in § 38.2-122.2 , delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth, and to certificates of credit involuntary unemployment insurance and credit property insurance delivered or issued for delivery in this Commonwealth where the group policy is delivered in another state.
History. 1976, c. 278, § 38.1-279.48:1; 1986, c. 562; 1988, c. 523; 1993, c. 985; 1997, c. 26; 2000, cc. 526, 548; 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 138.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 526 added subsection I.
The 2000 amendment by c. 548, in the last sentence of subsection A, deleted “or” following “§ 38.2-119 ” and added “or insurance of large commercial risks as defined in § 38.2-1903.1 .”
The 2021 Sp. Sess. I amendments.
The 2021 amendment by Sp. Sess. I, c. 138, effective July 1, 2021, in subsection A, deleted “at least thirty days” following “Commission” in the first sentence; in subsection C, inserted the first sentence; and made stylistic changes.
CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS
Endorsement deemed approved. —
As an insurer filed an endorsement limiting liability for mold damage with the Virginia Corporation Commission, Bureau of Insurance before December 16, 2001, and the Commission did not indicate its intent to withdraw approval until December 13, 2003, thirty days after December 16, 2001, the endorsement was deemed approved, as the Commission did not disapprove it within the time required by subsection C of § 38.2-317 . Byrnes v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 68 Va. Cir. 274, 2005 Va. Cir. LEXIS 120 (Fairfax County July 22, 2005).
Withdrawal of endorsement approval. —
The Virginia Corporation Commission, Bureau of Insurance’s withdrawal letter from an endorsement limiting an insurer’s liability for mold damage used the term “withdraw” instead of “disapprove” and complied with all of the statutory requirements for a withdrawal of approval, which indicated that the Commission recognized the endorsement had been approved. Byrnes v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 68 Va. Cir. 274, 2005 Va. Cir. LEXIS 120 (Fairfax County July 22, 2005).
§ 38.2-318. Validity of noncomplying forms.
- Any insurance policy or form containing any condition or provision that is not in compliance with this title shall be valid, but shall be construed and applied in accordance with the conditions and provisions required by this title.
- As used in this section, “form” means any contract, rider, endorsement, amendment, certificate, or application or other instrument providing, modifying, or eliminating insurance coverage.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-343; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Statutory provisions supersede inconsistent policy provisions. —
If the terms of the policy are inconsistent with statutory provisions, the statutory provisions supersede the inconsistent policy terms. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Yaconiello, 226 Va. 423 , 309 S.E.2d 324, 1983 Va. LEXIS 300 (1983).
Superseding provision takes effect only if policy restricts coverage. —
Where minor was passenger on uninsured moped which collided with truck, where insurance policy defined uninsured motor vehicle as motor vehicle which lacked effective protection by insurance coverage, and where insurer pointed out that former § 46.1-1 (15) (now § 46.2-100 ) specifically excluded bicycles and mopeds from definition of term motor vehicle, moped was motor vehicle within terms of uninsured motorist coverage because insurer’s policy afforded broader coverage and there is no prohibition against insurer offering broader coverage than minimum prescribed by law; superseding provisions of § 38.2-318 take effect only where insurer seeks, by policy language, to narrow, avoid, vary or restrict coverage legislature has required. Hill v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 237 Va. 148 , 375 S.E.2d 727, 5 Va. Law Rep. 1510, 1989 Va. LEXIS 18 (1989).
§ 38.2-319. Validity of contracts in violation of law.
Any insurance contract made in violation of the laws of this Commonwealth may be enforced against the insurer.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-32, 38-223; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-344; 1986, c. 562.
Law Review.
For 2000 survey of Virginia insurance law, see 34 U. Rich. L. Rev. 883 (2000).
§ 38.2-320. Insurer to furnish forms for proof of loss.
Whenever notice of any loss or damage has been given to the insurer or its agent, the insurer shall, upon written request, deliver to the insured or to the person to whom the benefits are payable the forms for such preliminary proof of loss or damage as may be required under the policy. Such forms shall be delivered within fifteen days after written request has been made or mailed to the insurer by the insured or person to whom benefits are payable. The failure or refusal of an insurer or its agent to deliver such forms within fifteen days of written request shall be deemed a waiver of any condition, stipulation or provision in the policy requiring preliminary proof.
History. Code 1950, § 38-11; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-345; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 56.
CASE NOTES
This section is applicable to life insurance contracts containing accidental death benefits. Wharton v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 134 F. Supp. 558, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2786 (D. Va. 1955).
It applies only to waiver of preliminary proofs. —
This section applies only to waiver of preliminary proofs. It is inapplicable to “amended proofs” and the burden rests upon claimant to supply same. Wharton v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 134 F. Supp. 558, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2786 (D. Va. 1955).
This section and § 38.2-314 do not change the rule adopted in North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. Edmundson, 104 Va. 486 , 52 S.E. 350 (1905), to the effect that failure to file proof of loss within the time specified in the policy does not bar an action on the policy if the proof of loss is filed before suit is brought. Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Bowers, 157 Va. 686 , 161 S.E. 914 , 1932 Va. LEXIS 321 (1932).
§ 38.2-321. Payment discharges insurer.
-
An insurer shall be fully discharged from all claims under a life insurance policy, accident and sickness insurance policy, or annuity contract:
- When the proceeds of or payments under a policy or contract become payable in accordance with (i) the terms of the policy or contract or (ii) the exercise of any right or privilege under the contract; and
- If the insurer makes payments in accordance with the terms of the policy or contract or any written assignment to the person designated in the policy or contract or by assignment as being entitled to the proceeds or payments.
- An insurer may not be fully discharged from all claims under a life insurance policy, accident and sickness insurance policy, or annuity contract before payment is made and if the insurer has received, at its home office, written notice that some other person claims to be entitled to payment or some interest in the policy or contract.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-346.1; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Insurer protected against double payment where insured and his assignee file claims. —
This section is designed, not to burden an insurer, but rather to protect it against double payment when both the insured and his assignee file claims for the same benefits. The notice proviso simply withholds that protection when the insurer has the knowledge necessary to protect itself. Kelly Health Care, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 226 Va. 376 , 309 S.E.2d 305, 1983 Va. LEXIS 294 (1983).
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Assignment of medical benefits payments. —
Assignments of medical benefits payable under automobile insurance policies where the policyholder assigns these benefits to a chiropractor who provided treatment covered by the policy are enforceable. Provisions of insurance contracts seeking to limit or preclude this kind of assignment are unenforceable so long as the assignment does not materially alter the risk or obligation of the insurer. See opinion of Attorney General to The Honorable Bill Janis, Member, House of Delegates, 10-066, (9/24/10).
§ 38.2-322. Standardized claims forms.
- No accident and sickness insurer, health maintenance organization, health services plan, or optometric services plan licensed in the Commonwealth shall refuse to accept, as a standard claims form for physician services or for services provided by chiropractors, optometrists, opticians, professional counselors, psychologists, clinical social workers, podiatrists, physical therapists, clinical nurse specialists who render mental health services, audiologists, and speech pathologists, the standardized HCFA-1500 health insurance claims form, or its successor as it may be amended from time to time. However, nothing in this section shall prohibit an insurer, health maintenance organization, health services plan, or optometric services plan from accepting any other claims form.
- No accident and sickness insurer, health maintenance organization, or health services plan licensed in the Commonwealth shall refuse to accept as a standard claims form for hospital services the standardized UB-82 claims form, or its successor as it may be amended from time to time. However, nothing in this section shall prohibit an accident and sickness insurer, health maintenance organization, or health services plan from accepting any other claims form.
- No accident and sickness insurer, health maintenance organization, health services plan, or dental services plan licensed in the Commonwealth shall refuse to accept as a standard claims form for dental services the standardized ADA form prepared by the American Dental Association, or its successor as it may be amended from time to time. However, nothing in this section shall prohibit an accident and sickness insurer, health maintenance organization, health services plan, or dental services plan from accepting any other claims form.
- The forms specified in this section may be modified as necessary to accommodate the transmission and administration of claims by electronic means.
- After July 1, 1998, no health maintenance organization authorized to transact business in this Commonwealth and no health insurer, health services plan or preferred provider organization authorized to offer health benefits in this Commonwealth that requires the use of the Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) identifying codes published by the American Medical Association for reporting claims for medical services and procedures, including any standardized form, shall refuse to accept and utilize these identifying codes and any appropriate modifiers listed therein when the same are appropriately used for processing such claims for provider services and procedures.
History. 1993, c. 307; 1997, c. 531.
§ 38.2-323. Repealed by Acts 2010, c. 337, cl. 1.
Editor’s note.
Former § 38.2-323 , prohibiting countersignature requirements in policies, was enacted by Acts 2002, c. 70.
§ 38.2-324. Disclosure of property damage information.
Nothing in this title shall prohibit an insurer or its agent from disclosing information obtained from policyholders or other persons regarding claims or reports of property damage resulting from a natural disaster, as defined in clause (ii) of the definition of “disaster” in § 44-146.16, to the Director of the Department of Emergency Management or his designees or other state officials, to federal officials, or to local government officials of the locality where the damage occurred; provided that the disclosures (i) do not identify persons whose property is damaged or the address thereof and (ii) include only aggregated data that relates to the assessment of damage from a natural disaster, including, but not limited to, the number of claims, estimates of the dollar amount of damage, and types of damage, for a specified geographic area, such as a census tract or zip code area.
History. 2005, c. 192; 2008, cc. 121, 157.
The 2008 amendments.
The 2008 amendments by cc. 121 and 157 are identical, and inserted “clause (ii) of the definition of ‘disaster’ in” preceding “§ 44-146.16.”
§ 38.2-325. Electronic delivery.
- If parties have agreed to conduct business by electronic means, and the agent of record, if applicable, has been so notified by the insurer, any information that is required to be delivered in writing may be delivered by (i) placing such information within the body of the electronic message; (ii) placing such information as an attachment to the electronic message that may be opened through the use of software that is readily available; (iii) displaying the information, or a clear and conspicuous link to the information, as an essential step to completing the transaction to which the information relates; or (iv) placing such information on the insurer’s secured server and an electronic message is provided advising that insurance information or, when appropriate, time-sensitive insurance information has been placed on the insurer’s secured server and is available for retrieval. This section should be construed to be consistent with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq.).
- If parties have agreed to conduct business by electronic means, and notice is provided by the insurer to the named insured pursuant to § 38.2-231 , 38.2-2113 , 38.2-2114 , 38.2-2208 , or 38.2-2212 , an electronic notification shall also be provided to the agent of record of the named insured, if the named insured has an agent of record. Such electronic notification shall be transmitted to the agent of record as soon as practicable, but in no case more than 72 hours after electronic notice is transmitted to the named insured.
- The insurer shall retain evidence of electronic notification to the agent of record for at least one year from the date of transmittal. Failure to provide such notice to the agent of record shall not be deemed to invalidate any electronic notice otherwise properly provided to the named insured. For purposes of this section, an electronic notification to the agent of record shall mean a copy of the actual notice, as set forth herein, or in the alternative, shall include the named insured’s name, policy number, and termination date. Electronic notice need not be given to the agent of record if the agent (i) is an employee of the insurer, (ii) is a non-employee exclusive agent of the insurer, or (iii) has waived the receipt of such notices in writing.
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any property and casualty insurance forms and endorsements that do not contain personally identifiable information may be posted to the insurer’s publicly available website in lieu of any other method of delivery,
provided that:
- Such forms and endorsements are readily accessible on the insurer’s website and that once such forms or endorsements are no longer used in the Commonwealth they are stored in a readily accessible archive portion of the insurer’s website;
- Such forms and endorsements are posted in such a manner that they may be readily printed and downloaded without charge and without the use of any special program or application that is not readily available to the public without charge;
- The insurer provides written notice at time of the issuance of the initial policy forms and any renewal forms of a method by which policyholders may obtain, upon request and without charge, a paper or electronic copy of their policy or contract; and
- The insurer gives notice, in the manner it customarily communicates with a policyholder, of any changes to the forms or endorsements, and of the policyholder’s right to obtain, upon request and without charge, a paper or electronic copy of such forms or endorsements.
- The notification to an insurer of any change of the electronic address for the named insured shall be the sole responsibility of the named insured. The giving to the agent of record by any person of notice of such change of the named insured’s electronic address shall not be deemed to be notice to the insurer unless it is specifically identified as a change and receipt has been accepted by the agent of record.
-
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any evidence of coverage or other forms that do not contain personally identifiable information that a health carrier is required to provide to a policyholder, subscriber, or enrollee may be delivered electronically
to the policyholder, subscriber, or enrollee or posted to the health carrier’s publicly available website in lieu of any other method of delivery, provided that:
- Such evidence of coverage and endorsements, riders, or amendments to it are readily accessible on the health carrier’s website and that once such evidence of coverage and endorsements, riders, or amendments to it are no longer used in the Commonwealth they will be made available electronically upon request;
- Such evidence of coverage and endorsements, riders, or amendments to it are posted in such a manner that they may be readily printed and downloaded without charge and without the use of any special program or application that is not readily available to the public without charge;
- The health carrier provides written notice at the time of the issuance of the initial evidence of coverage and any renewals of a method by which the policyholder, subscriber, or enrollee may obtain, upon request and without charge, a paper or electronic copy of such person’s evidence of coverage or endorsements, riders, or amendments to it; and
- The health carrier gives notice, in the manner in which it customarily communicates with a policyholder, subscriber, or enrollee, of any changes to the evidence of coverage or endorsements, riders, or amendments to it and of the right of such policyholder, subscriber, or enrollee to obtain a paper or electronic copy of such evidence of coverage or endorsements, riders, or amendments to it.
History. 2009, c. 215; 2012, c. 293; 2013, c. 257; 2016, c. 475.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2016, c. 475, cl. 2, and Acts 2016, c. 508, cl. 1, repealed Acts 2013, c. 257, cl. 2, which had provided for the December 31, 2016, expiration date for subsection E. Subsection E will not expire December 31, 2016.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 293 added subsection D.
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendment by c. 257 deleted “other than a notice of cancellation of a policy” following “delivered in writing” in subsection A; and added subsection E. For expiration of subsection E, see Editor’s note.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendment by c. 475 added subsection F.
§ 38.2-326. Plan management functions.
- As used in this section:“Exchange” means either the (i) federal health benefit exchange established by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to § 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act codified as 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c) in the Commonwealth or (ii) state-based exchange established pursuant to Chapter 65 (§ 38.2-6500 et seq.) and § 1311(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act codified as 42 U.S.C. § 18031.“Plan management functions” means analyses and reviews necessary to support the certification, decertification, and recertification of qualified health plans and stand-alone dental plans for the participation in an exchange and the collection of data necessary to perform the above functions.
- The Commission’s Bureau of Insurance, with the assistance of the Virginia Department of Health, shall perform plan management functions required to certify health benefit plans and stand-alone dental plans for participation in the exchange, provided that: (i) full funding is available; (ii) the technology infrastructure, including integration with federal, state, and other necessary entities, is made available to the Commission in order for it to carry out the plan management functions authorized in this section; and (iii) there are no other impediments that effectively prevent the Commission from performing any required plan management functions.
- The Commission’s Bureau of Insurance may contract and enter into memoranda of understanding to carry out its plan management functions.
- The Commission shall not use any special fund revenues dedicated to its other functions and duties unrelated to exchange operations, including revenues from utility consumer taxes or fees from licensees or registrants regulated by the Commission or fees paid to the Clerk’s Office, to fund the plan management functions.
- Technology resources provided by the Commission in carrying out the plan management functions shall be limited to existing Commission technology support functions such as desktop support, network administration support, web services support, or other similar support functions.
- The Commission shall make available to the public on its website a written report on the implementation and performance of its plan management functions during the preceding fiscal year, including, at a minimum, the manner in which all funds utilized for its plan management functions were expended.
History. 2013, cc. 670, 679; 2020, cc. 916, 917.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2020, cc. 916 and 917, cl. 5 provides: “That the State Corporation Commission shall implement the provisions of this act as it receives notice of approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and to the extent of such approval.”
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendments by cc. 916 and 917 are identical, and added subsection A; redesignated and rewrote former subsections A and B as B and C, relating to plan management function definitions; deleted former subsection C, relating to funding; and substituted “unrelated to exchange operations, including revenues” for “but not limited to, revenues” in subsection D.
Chapter 4. Assessment for Administration of Insurance Laws and Declarations of Estimated Assessments by Insurers.
§ 38.2-400. Expense of administration of insurance laws borne by licensees; minimum contribution.
- The expense of maintaining the Bureau of the Commission responsible for administering the insurance laws of this Commonwealth, including a reasonable margin in the nature of a reserve fund, shall be assessed annually by the Commission against all companies and surplus lines brokers subject to this title except premium finance companies and providers of continuing care registered pursuant to Chapter 49 (§ 38.2-4900 et seq.) of this title. The assessment shall be in proportion to the direct gross premium income on business done in this Commonwealth. The assessment shall not exceed one-tenth of one percent of the direct gross premium income and shall be levied pursuant to § 38.2-403 . For any year a company is subject to an assessment, the assessment shall not be less than $300.
- All fees assessed under any provision of this title and paid into the state treasury shall be deposited to a special fund designated “Bureau of Insurance Special Fund — State Corporation Commission,” and out of such special fund and the unexpended balance thereof shall be appropriated the sums necessary for the regulation, supervision and examination of all entities subject to regulation under this title. Any references in the Code of Virginia to funds being paid directly into the state treasury and credited to the fund for the maintenance of the Bureau of Insurance shall hereinafter mean the “Bureau of Insurance Special Fund — State Corporation Commission.”
History. Code 1950, § 38-17; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-44; 1954, c. 231; 1960, c. 294; 1977, cc. 317, 613; 1978, c. 4; 1981, c. 605; 1986, c. 562; 1987, cc. 558, 565, 655; 1994, c. 316.
Cross references.
As to powers of the Commission with respect to supervisory colleges, see § 38.2-1332.1 .
As to the application of this article to licensed group self-insurance associations formed by employers subject to Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, see § 65.2-802 .
§ 38.2-401. Fire Programs Fund.
-
- There is hereby established in the state treasury a special nonreverting fund to be known as the Fire Programs Fund, hereinafter referred to as “the Fund.” The Fund shall be administered by the Department of Fire Programs under policies and definitions established by the Virginia Fire Services Board. All moneys collected pursuant to the assessment made by the Commission pursuant to subdivision 2 of this subsection shall be paid into the state treasury and credited to the Fund. The Fund shall also consist of any moneys appropriated thereto by the General Assembly and any grants or other moneys received by the Virginia Fire Services Board or Department of Fire Programs for the purposes set forth in this section. Any moneys deposited to or remaining in such Fund during or at the end of each fiscal year or biennium, including interest thereon, shall not revert to the general fund but shall remain in the Fund. Interest earned on all moneys in the Fund and interest earned on moneys held by the Commission pursuant to subdivision 2 of this subsection prior to the deposit of such moneys into the Fund, including interest earned on such moneys during any period when the Commission is reconciling payments from insurers, shall remain in or be deposited into the Fund, as the case may be, and be credited to it. Such interest shall be set aside for fire service purposes in accordance with policies developed by the Virginia Fire Services Board. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, policies established by the Virginia Fire Services Board for the administration of the Fund, and any grants provided from the Fund, that are not inconsistent with the purposes set out in this section shall be binding upon any locality that accepts such funds or related grants. The Commission shall be reimbursed from the Fund for all expenses necessary for the administration of this section. The balance of moneys in the Fund shall be allocated periodically as provided in this section. Expenditures and disbursements from the Fund shall be made by the State Treasurer on warrants issued by the Comptroller upon written request signed by the Executive Director of the Department of Fire Programs (Director) or his designee. A. 1. There is hereby established in the state treasury a special nonreverting fund to be known as the Fire Programs Fund, hereinafter referred to as “the Fund.” The Fund shall be administered by the Department of Fire Programs under policies and definitions established by the Virginia Fire Services Board. All moneys collected pursuant to the assessment made by the Commission pursuant to subdivision 2 of this subsection shall be paid into the state treasury and credited to the Fund. The Fund shall also consist of any moneys appropriated thereto by the General Assembly and any grants or other moneys received by the Virginia Fire Services Board or Department of Fire Programs for the purposes set forth in this section. Any moneys deposited to or remaining in such Fund during or at the end of each fiscal year or biennium, including interest thereon, shall not revert to the general fund but shall remain in the Fund. Interest earned on all moneys in the Fund and interest earned on moneys held by the Commission pursuant to subdivision 2 of this subsection prior to the deposit of such moneys into the Fund, including interest earned on such moneys during any period when the Commission is reconciling payments from insurers, shall remain in or be deposited into the Fund, as the case may be, and be credited to it. Such interest shall be set aside for fire service purposes in accordance with policies developed by the Virginia Fire Services Board. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, policies established by the Virginia Fire Services Board for the administration of the Fund, and any grants provided from the Fund, that are not inconsistent with the purposes set out in this section shall be binding upon any locality that accepts such funds or related grants. The Commission shall be reimbursed from the Fund for all expenses necessary for the administration of this section. The balance of moneys in the Fund shall be allocated periodically as provided in this section. Expenditures and disbursements from the Fund shall be made by the State Treasurer on warrants issued by the Comptroller upon written request signed by the Executive Director of the Department of Fire Programs (Director) or his designee.
- The Commission shall annually assess against all licensed insurance companies doing business in the Commonwealth by writing any type of insurance as defined in §§ 38.2-110 , 38.2-111 , 38.2-126 , 38.2-130 and 38.2-131 and those combination policies as defined in § 38.2-1921 that contain insurance as defined in §§ 38.2-110 , 38.2-111 and 38.2-126 , an assessment in the amount of one percent of the total direct gross premium income for such insurance. Such assessment shall be apportioned, assessed and paid as prescribed by § 38.2-403 . In any year in which a company has no direct gross premium income or in which its direct gross premium income is insufficient to produce at the rate of assessment prescribed by law an amount equal to or in excess of $100, there shall be so apportioned and assessed against such company a contribution of $100.
- After reserving funds for the Fire Services Grant Program and Dry Fire Hydrant Grant Program pursuant to subsection D, 75 percent of the remaining moneys available for allocation from the Fund shall be allocated to the several counties, cities, and towns of the Commonwealth providing fire service operations to be used for the improvement of volunteer and career fire services in each of the receiving localities. Funds allocated to the counties, cities, and towns pursuant to this subsection shall not be used directly or indirectly to supplant or replace any other funds appropriated by the counties, cities, and towns for fire service operations. Such funds shall be used solely for the purposes of (i) training volunteer or career firefighting personnel in each of the receiving localities; (ii) funding fire prevention and public safety education programs; (iii) constructing, improving, and expanding regional or local fire service training facilities; (iv) purchasing emergency medical care and equipment for fire personnel; (v) payment of personnel costs related to fire and medical training for fire personnel; (vi) purchasing personal protective equipment, vehicles, equipment, and supplies for use in the receiving locality specifically for fire service purposes; or (vii) providing training and education and purchasing products, including personal protective equipment, diesel exhaust removal systems, decontamination equipment, and commercial extractors, that are designed to reduce the incidence of cancer among firefighters. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Code, when localities use such funds to construct, improve, or expand fire service training facilities, fire-related training provided at such training facilities shall be by instructors certified or approved according to policies developed by the Virginia Fire Services Board. Distribution of this 75 percent of the Fund shall be made on the basis of population as provided for in §§ 4.1-116 and 4.1-117 ; however, no county or city eligible for such funds shall receive less than $10,000, nor eligible town less than $4,000. The Virginia Fire Services Board shall be authorized to exceed allocations of $10,000 for eligible counties and cities and $4,000 for eligible towns, respectively. Allocations to counties, cities, and towns receiving such allocations shall be fair and equitable as set forth in Board policy. Any increases or decreases in such allocations shall be uniform for all localities. In order to remain eligible for such funds, each receiving locality shall report annually to the Department on the use of the funds allocated to it for the previous year and shall provide a completed Fire Programs Fund Disbursement Agreement form. Each receiving locality shall be responsible for certifying the proper use of the funds. If, at the end of any annual reporting period, a satisfactory report and a completed agreement form have not been submitted by a receiving locality, any funds due to that locality for the next year shall not be retained. Such funds shall be added to the 75 percent of the Fund allocated to the counties, cities, and towns of the Commonwealth for improvement of fire services in localities.
- The remainder of the moneys available for allocation from the Fund shall be used for (i) the purposes of carrying out the powers and duties assigned to the Department of Fire Programs under Chapter 2 (§ 9.1-200 ) of Title 9.1, which shall include providing funded training and administrative support services for nonfunded training to localities and (ii) the payment of the compensation and costs of expenses of the members of the Fire Services Board in performing their official duties; however, the Fund shall not be used for salaries or operating expenses associated with the Office of the State Fire Marshal.
- The Fire Services Grant Program is hereby established and will be used as grants to provide regional fire services training facilities, to finance the Virginia Fire Incident Reporting System and to build or repair live fire training structures as determined by the Virginia Fire Services Board. Beginning January 1, 1996, $1 million from the assessments made pursuant to this section shall be distributed each year for the Fire Services Grant Program to be used as herein provided, and $100,000 shall be distributed annually for continuing the statewide Dry Fire Hydrant Grant Program. Moneys allocated pursuant to this subsection shall be used for the purposes stated in this subsection, and for no other purpose. All grants provided from these programs shall be administered by the Department according to the policies established by the Virginia Fire Services Board.
- Moneys in the Fund shall not be diverted or expended for any purpose not authorized by this section.
- The Director shall establish written standards for determining the extent to which clients outside the Commonwealth shall be financially responsible for the cost of fire and emergency services training provided by the Department of Fire Programs. Revenues generated by such training shall be retained in the Fire Programs Fund and may be used solely for providing additional funded direct training to members of Virginia’s fire and emergency services.
History. 1985, c. 545, § 38.1-44.1; 1986, cc. 60, 562; 1988, c. 336; 1995, cc. 615, 637; 1997, c. 791; 1998, cc. 166, 877; 2000, c. 820; 2001, cc. 397, 413; 2002, c. 389; 2004, c. 164; 2006, cc. 58, 322; 2007, cc. 647, 741; 2018, c. 649; 2019, c. 509.
Cross references.
As to the powers of the executive director of the Department of Fire Programs, see § 9.1-201 .
As to the powers, duties and limitations of the Virginia Fire Services Board, see § 9.1-203 .
As to establishment of the Virginia Thermal Imaging Camera Grant Fund, see § 9.1-205 .
Editor’s note.
Pursuant to § 30-152, effect has been given in this section, as set out above, to Acts 1986, c. 60, which amended former § 38.1-44.1, the comparable provision in former Title 38.1.
Acts 1989, cc. 19 and 103 repealed Acts 1985, c. 545, cl. 3, which had provided an expiration date for Acts 1985, c. 545, the act which enacted § 38.1-44.1 (now this section).
Acts 2020, c. 1289, as amended by Acts 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 552, Item 415 A, effective for the biennium ending June 30, 2022, provides: “Notwithstanding the provisions of § 38.2-401 , Code of Virginia, up to 25 percent of the revenue available from the Fire Programs Fund, after making the distributions set out in § 38.2-401 D, Code of Virginia, may be used by the Department of Fire Programs to pay for the administrative costs of all activities assigned to it by law.”
The 1998 amendments.
The 1998 amendments by cc. 166 and 877 are identical, and, in subsection D, in the second sentence, substituted “one million dollars” for “$1,000,000,” and in the last sentence, substituted “this Fund” for “the fund”; and added subsection E.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 820 rewrote this section.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 397, in subsection B, substituted “not be retained” for “be retained until said documents are submitted to the Department” in the next-to-last sentence, and added the last sentence.
The 2001 amendment by c. 413 inserted “purchasing emergency medical care and equipment for fire personnel; payment of personnel costs related to fire and medical training for fire personnel;” near the middle of subsection B.
The 2002 amendments.
The 2002 amendment by c. 389 inserted the present third sentence in subsection D.
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendment by c. 164 inserted “(Director)” in the last sentence of subdivision A 1; substituted “75” for “seventy-five” in three places in subsection B; substituted “$1 million” for “one million dollars” in the first sentence of subsection D; added subsection F; and made a minor stylistic change.
The 2006 amendments.
The 2006 amendment by c. 58 added clause (ii) in subsection C.
The 2006 amendment by c. 322 inserted the sixth through eighth sentences in subsection B.
The 2007 amendments.
The 2007 amendments by cc. 647 and 741, effective July 1, 2008, are identical, and added the proviso at the end of subsection C.
The 2018 amendments.
The 2018 amendment by c. 649, in subsection B, designated existing provisions of the third sentence as clauses (i) through (vi), added clause (vii) and made related changes.
The 2019 amendments.
The 2019 amendment by c. 509 substituted “live fire training structures” for “burn buildings” in subsection D.
§ 38.2-401.1. Dam Safety, Flood Prevention and Protection Assistance Fund assessment.
The Commission shall annually assess against all licensed insurance companies doing business in this Commonwealth by writing any type of flood insurance an assessment in the amount of one percent of the total direct gross premium income for such insurance. Such assessment shall be apportioned, assessed, and paid as prescribed by § 38.2-403 . In any year in which a company has no direct gross premium income from flood insurance or in which its direct gross premium income from flood insurance is insufficient to produce at the rate of assessment prescribed by law an amount equal to or in excess of $100, there shall be so apportioned and assessed against such company a contribution of $100. One hundred percent of the total amount collected annually pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Dam Safety, Flood Prevention and Protection Assistance Fund established per § 10.1-603.17 . The assessment established by this section shall not apply to premium income for policies written pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 or for policies providing comprehensive motor vehicle insurance coverage.
History. 1990, c. 916; 2006, cc. 648, 765.
Editor’s note.
Repeal of this section by Acts 1997, c. 590 was contingent on funding in the general appropriation act. The funding was not provided, and therefore, the repeal never took effect.
Acts 2006, cc. 648 and 765, cl. 3, provides: “That the Department of Conservation and Recreation shall repeal through an exempt action the Flood Prevention and Protection Assistance Fund Regulations (4 VAC 5-50-10 et seq.).”
Acts 2006, cc. 648 and 765, cl. 4, provides: “That upon the effective date of this act, the Department of Accounts, with the concurrence of the Department of Conservation and Recreation, may transfer the Dam Safety, Flood Prevention and Protection Assistance Fund and its unobligated balance to the Virginia Resources Authority to be administered and managed in accordance with this act.”
The 2006 amendments.
The 2006 amendments by cc. 648 and 765 are identical, and inserted “Dam Safety” in the fourth sentence.
§ 38.2-402. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
“Assessable year” means the calendar year upon which the direct gross premium income is computed under this chapter. In the case of direct gross premium income for a fraction of a calendar year, the term includes the period in which that direct gross premium income is received or derived from business in this Commonwealth.
“Direct gross premium income” means direct gross premium as defined in § 58.1-2500 .
“License year” means the 12-month period beginning on July 1 next succeeding the assessable year and ending on June 30 of the subsequent year. This shall also be the year in which annual reports of direct gross premium income are required to be filed under § 38.2-406 and the annual assessment paid under the provisions of this chapter.
History. 1977, c. 317, §§ 38.1-48.1, 38.1-48.2; 1978, c. 4; 1986, c. 562; 1996, c. 22; 2012, c. 584.
Cross references.
As to the application of this article to licensed group self-insurance associations formed by employer subject to the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, see § 65.2-802 .
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 584 deleted the former paragraph defining “Estimated assessment,” and made a minor stylistic change.
§ 38.2-403. Assessment for expenses.
The Commission shall assess each company annually for its just share of expenses. The assessment shall be in proportion to direct gross premium income for the year immediately preceding that for which the assessment is made. The Commission shall give the companies notice of the assessment which shall be paid to the Commission on or before March 1 of each year for deposit into the state treasury as provided in subsection B of § 38.2-400 . Any company that fails to pay the assessment on or before the date herein prescribed shall be subject to a penalty imposed by the Commission. The penalty shall be ten percent of the assessment and interest shall be charged at a rate pursuant to § 58.1-1812 for the period between the due date and the date of full payment. If a payment is made in an amount later found to be in error, the Commission shall, (i) if an additional amount is due, notify the company of the additional amount and the company shall pay the additional amount within fourteen days of the date of the notice or, (ii) if an overpayment is made, process a refund.
History. Code 1950, § 38-18; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-45; 1977, c. 317; 1978, c. 4; 1986, c. 562; 1994, c. 316; 2012, c. 584; 2017, c. 39.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 584 deleted “as provided for in subsection B of § 38.2-410” at the end of the last sentence.
The 2017 amendments.
The 2017 amendment by c. 39 substituted “process a refund” for “order a refund” at the end of the section.
§ 38.2-403.1. Omitted assessments.
If the Commission ascertains that any assessment that could have been assessed during any current assessable year has not been assessed for any assessable year of the three years last past, or that the same has been assessed at less than the law required for any one or more of such years, or that the assessment, for any cause, has not been realized, the Commission shall list and assess the same at the rate prescribed for that year, adding thereto a penalty of 10 percent and interest at the rate established pursuant to § 58.1-1812 which shall be computed upon the assessment from the due date of the assessment until the assessment is paid.
History. 2016, c. 193.
§ 38.2-404. Recovery of such assessments; revocation or suspension of license.
If an assessment made under § 38.2-403 is not paid to the Commission by the prescribed date, the amount of the assessment, penalty, and interest may be recovered from the defaulting company on motion of the Commission made in the name and for the use of the Commonwealth in the appropriate circuit court after ten days’ notice to the company. The license or certificate of authority of any defaulting company to transact business in this Commonwealth may be revoked or suspended by the Commission until it has paid such assessment.
History. Code 1950, § 38-19; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-46; 1978, c. 4; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-405. Application for correction of assessment.
Any corporation aggrieved by the assessment assessed or imposed by or under authority of this chapter and collected from any corporation, domestic or foreign, may, within one year from the date of the payment of such assessment, apply to the Commission for a refund, in whole or in part, of the amount so assessed or imposed and paid. No payment shall be recovered after a formal adjudication in a proceeding in which the right of appeal existed and was not taken. Such application shall be by written petition, in duplicate and verified by affidavit. Such application shall be filed with the Commission and shall set forth the names and addresses of every party in interest.
History. Code 1950, § 38-20; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-47; 1978, c. 4; 1986, c. 562; 2016, c. 193.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendments by c. 193 rewrote section, which read “A company aggrieved by the assessment may appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia in accordance with the Rules of Court applicable to appeals from the State Corporation Commission. If the court is of the opinion that the assessment is either excessive or insufficient, the court shall by its order request the Commission to make appropriate adjustments. If the appellant fails to pay the assessment when due and the court affirms the action of the Commission, judgment shall be entered against the appellant for damages, which are to be paid to the Commission, equal to legal interest upon the amount of the assessment from the time the assessment was payable. If relief is granted in whole or in part, judgment shall be rendered against the Commonwealth for any excess that may have been paid, with legal interest.”
§ 38.2-406. Report of gross premium income.
Each company subject to assessment under this chapter shall, on or before March 1 of each year, report under oath to the Commission, upon forms to be furnished or approved by, and in such detail as may be prescribed by, the Commission, the direct gross premium income derived from its business in this Commonwealth during the preceding year ending December 31. Every company failing to file the assessment report on or before March 1 shall be subject to a penalty of $50 for each day after the report is due. If such failure is due to providential or other good cause shown to the satisfaction of the Commission, such report may be accepted exclusive of penalties.
History. Code 1950, § 38-21; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-48; 1977, c. 317; 1978, c. 4; 1986, c. 562; 2003, c. 371; 2012, c. 584.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 371 rewrote the section.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendment by c. 584 added the second and third sentences.
§§ 38.2-407 through 38.2-411. Repealed by Acts 2012, c. 584, cl. 2.
Editor’s note.
Former § 38.2-407 , pertaining to declarations of estimated assessment, derived from 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.2; 1986, c. 562; 1998, c. 15. Former § 38.2-408, pertaining to time for filing declarations of estimated assessment, derived from 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.3; 1986, c. 562. Former § 38.2-409, pertaining to installment payment of estimated assessment, derived from 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.4; 1986, c. 562. Former § 38.2-410, pertaining to where declarations filed and how payments made; refunding overpayments, derived from 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.5; 1986, c. 562. Former § 38.2-411, pertaining to failure to pay estimated assessment, derived from 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.6; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-412. Companies going out of business.
If a company goes out of business or ceases to be a company in this Commonwealth in any assessable or license year, the company shall remain liable for the payment of the assessment measured by direct gross premium income for the period in which it operated as a company and received or derived direct gross premium income from business in this Commonwealth.
History. 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.7; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-413. Double assessment respecting same direct gross premium income negated.
This chapter shall not be construed to require including any direct gross premium income used previously in calculating the assessment imposed by this chapter for any license year or fraction thereof, and the assessment paid thereon.
History. 1977, c. 317, § 38.1-48.9; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-414. Assessments to fund program to reduce losses from motor vehicle thefts.
- To provide funds to establish and operate a statewide program to receive and reward information leading to the arrest of persons who commit motor vehicle theft-related crimes in Virginia, each insurer licensed to write insurance coverage as defined in § 38.2-124 shall, prior to March 1 of each year, pay an assessment equal to one-quarter of one percent of the total direct gross premium income for automobile physical damage insurance other than collision written in the Commonwealth during the preceding calendar year.
- Assessments received pursuant to subsection A of this section, and all other moneys received by the Commission for the same purpose, shall be segregated and placed in a fund to be known as the Help Eliminate Automobile Theft Fund, hereinafter referred to as the HEAT Fund.
- Any insurer that fails to pay the assessment on or before the date prescribed in subsection A shall be subject to a penalty imposed by the Commission. The penalty shall be ten percent of the assessment and interest shall be charged at a rate pursuant to § 58.1-1812 for the period between the date due and the date of full payment. If a payment is made in an amount later found to be in error, the Commission shall, (i) if an additional amount is due, notify the insurer of the additional amount, which the insurer shall pay within fourteen days of the date of the notice or, (ii) if an overpayment is made, order a refund of the amount of the overpayment, which shall be paid out of the HEAT Fund. The Commission shall be reimbursed from the Fund for all expenses necessary for the administration of this section.
- The HEAT Fund shall be controlled and administered by the Superintendent of the Department of State Police. The Superintendent shall appoint an advisory committee of seven members to assist in developing and annually reviewing the plan of operation for the HEAT Fund program.
-
Money in the HEAT Fund shall be expended as follows:
- To pay the costs of establishing and operating a program to receive and reward information leading to the arrest of persons who commit motor vehicle theft-related crimes in Virginia.
- Any uncommitted funds remaining in the HEAT Fund on the last day of February of each year may be transferred to the Department of State Police, Department of Motor Vehicles, or Department of Criminal Justice Services for the following purposes: (i) providing financial support to state or local law-enforcement agencies for motor vehicle theft enforcement efforts, (ii) providing financial support to local prosecutors or judicial agencies for programs designed to reduce the incidence of motor vehicle theft, and (iii) conducting educational programs to inform vehicle owners of methods of preventing motor vehicle theft.
History. 1991, c. 318; 1993, c. 196.
§ 38.2-415. Assessment to fund program to reduce losses from insurance fraud.
- Each licensed insurer doing business in the Commonwealth by writing any type of insurance as defined in §§ 38.2-110 through 38.2-122.2 and 38.2-124 through 38.2-132 shall pay, in addition to any other assessments provided in this title, an assessment in an amount equal to 0.05 of one percent of the direct gross premium income during the preceding calendar year. The assessment shall be apportioned and assessed and paid as prescribed by § 38.2-403 . The Commission shall be reimbursed from the fund for all necessary expenses for the administration of this section.
- The assessments made by the Commission under subsection A and paid into the state treasury shall be deposited to a special fund designated “Virginia State Police, Insurance Fraud,” and out of such special fund and the unexpended balance thereof shall be appropriated the sums necessary for accomplishing the powers and duties assigned to the Virginia State Police under Chapter 9 (§ 52-36 et seq.) of Title 52. All interest earned from the deposit of moneys accumulated in the Fund shall be deposited in the Fund for the same use.
- The moneys deposited in the Fund shall not be considered general revenue of the Commonwealth but shall be used only to (i) effectuate the purposes enumerated in Chapter 9 (§ 52-36 et seq.) of Title 52 and (ii) reimburse the Commission for its necessary expenses for the administration of this section. The Fund shall be subject to audit by the Auditor of Public Accounts.
- In the event that the Insurance Fraud Investigation Unit is dissolved by operation of law or otherwise, any balance remaining in the Fund, after deducting administrative costs associated with the dissolution, shall be returned to insurers in proportion to their financial contributions to the Fund in the preceding calendar year.
History. 1998, c. 590; 1999, c. 483; 2000, c. 526.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1998, c. 590, cl. 3 provides: “That the provisions of this act will expire on January 1, 2003.” However Acts 2002, c. 316, cl. 1 deleted cl. 3 of the 1998 act. Therefore, this section remains in effect.
Acts 2020, c. 1289, as amended by Acts 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 552, Item 425 E 1, effective for the biennium ending June 30, 2022, provides: “Notwithstanding the provisions of § 19.2-386.14 , 38.2-415 , 46.2-1167 and 52-4.3 , Code of Virginia, the Department of State Police may use revenue from the State Asset Forfeiture Fund, the Insurance Fraud Fund, the Drug Investigation Trust Account — State, and the Safety Fund to modify, enhance or procure automated systems that focus on the Commonwealth’s law enforcement activities and information gathering processes.”
The 1999 amendment deleted “collected” preceding “during the preceding” in the first sentence of subsection A.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 526 substituted “38.2-122.2” for “38.2-122.1” in subsection A.
Chapter 5. Unfair Trade Practices.
§ 38.2-500. Declaration of purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate trade practices in the business of insurance in accordance with the intent of Congress as expressed in the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011 through 1015, by defining and prohibiting all practices in this Commonwealth that constitute unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-49; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 7.
CASE NOTES
Federal preemption of state laws in relation to employee benefit plans. —
State laws, insofar as they are invoked by beneficiaries claiming relief for injuries arising out of the administration of employee benefit plans, “relate to” such plans and, absent an applicable exemption, are preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Claims for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and for violations of the Virginia Unfair Trade Practices Act, both of which purport to impose duties on insurers, are not rescued from preemption by an “insurance saving clause,” in 29 U.S.C. § 1144(b)(2)(A), since the insurance saving clause is limited by the so-called “deemer clause,” which provides that no employee benefit plan shall be deemed to be an insurance company or other insurer or to be engaged in the business of insurance for purposes of any law of any State purporting to regulate insurance companies or insurance contracts. Powell v. C & P Tel. Co., 780 F.2d 419, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25723 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170, 106 S. Ct. 2892, 90 L. Ed. 2d 980, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1645 (1986).
Application of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) to afford redress for violation of Chapter 5, would invalidate and impair the regulation sought to be accomplished by Chapter 5 and the enforcement mechanisms of §§ 38.2-218 through 38.2-220 . Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc., 891 F. Supp. 1153, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9070 (E.D. Va. 1995).
Because RICO provides for a private cause of action and treble damages, and because these provisions of RICO differ dramatically from the way in which Virginia’s insurance code addresses the same conduct, RICO would in effect replace Chapter 5 as the principal means by which to remedy such conduct. It would convert a system of public redress into a system of private redress. The forum for redress would shift from the State Corporation Commission (SCC) to the federal courts. The result of these effects would be that RICO would supersede Virginia’s laws. Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc., 891 F. Supp. 1153, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9070 (E.D. Va. 1995).
Personal-stake exception to intracorporate immunity. —
In an action by plaintiff chiropractors, their associations and patients alleging anti-chiropractic discrimination by a health care plan, plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to satisfy the personal-stake exception to the doctrine of intracorporate immunity for purposes of wording a motion to dismiss, where plaintiffs asserted that competing physicians, as members of the plan’s provider policy committee, had a direct interest in the market for healthcare services which was distinct and independent from their roles as agents of the plan. Am. Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc., 151 F. Supp. 2d 723, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10348 (W.D. Va. 2001).
The Virginia Unfair Insurance Practices Act does not establish a private cause of action. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987); Salomon v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 801 F.2d 659, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30863 (4th Cir. 1986).
An award of punitive damages may not rest on a jury finding that defendant violated the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987).
When duty of good faith arises in uninsured motorist cases. —
Neither the Virginia Unfair Trade Practices Act nor the statutory history of the statute indicates the existence of a pretrial duty of good faith in the context of uninsured motorist insurance, because each of those provisions addresses certain conduct by carriers vis-a-vis claims. Manu v. GEICO Cas. Co., 293 Va. 371 , 798 S.E.2d 598, 2017 Va. LEXIS 73 (2017).
§ 38.2-501. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
“Insurance policy” or “insurance contract” includes annuities and any group or individual contract, certificate, or evidence of coverage, including, but not limited to, those issued by a health services plan, health maintenance organization, legal services organization, legal services plan, or dental or optometric services plan as provided for in Chapters 42 (§ 38.2-4200 et seq.), 43 (§ 38.2-4300 et seq.), 44 (§ 38.2-4400 et seq.) and 45 (§ 38.2-4500 et seq.) of this title issued, proposed for issuance, or intended for issuance, by any person.
“Lending institution” means any corporation, company or organization that accepts deposits from the public and lends money in this Commonwealth, including banks and savings institutions.
“Person,” in addition to the definition in Chapter 1 (§ 38.2-100 et seq.) of this title, extends to any other legal entity transacting the business of insurance, including agents, brokers and adjusters. “Person” also means health, legal, dental, and optometric service plans and health maintenance organizations, as provided for in Chapters 42, 43, 44 and 45 of this title. For the purposes of this chapter, such service plans shall be deemed to be transacting the business of insurance. “Person” also means premium finance companies.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-50; 1977, c. 529; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1989, c. 653; 1992, c. 7; 2001, c. 707.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 707 substituted “legal services organization” for “legal organization” in the paragraph defining “Insurance policy.”
§ 38.2-502. Misrepresentations and false advertising of insurance policies.
No person shall make, issue, circulate, cause or knowingly allow to be made, issued or circulated, any estimate, illustration, circular, statement, sales presentation, omission, or comparison that:
- Misrepresents the benefits, advantages, conditions or terms of any insurance policy;
- Misrepresents the dividends or share of the surplus to be received on any insurance policy;
- Makes any false or misleading statements as to the dividends or share of surplus previously paid on any insurance policy;
- Misrepresents or is misleading as to the financial condition of any person or the legal reserve system upon which any life insurer operates;
- Uses any name or title of any insurance policy or class of insurance policies that misrepresents the true nature of the policy or policies;
- Misrepresents any material fact for the purpose of inducing or tending to induce the lapse, forfeiture, exchange, conversion, replacement, or surrender of any insurance policy;
- Misrepresents any material fact for the purpose of effecting a pledge, assignment, or loan on any insurance policy; or
- Misrepresents any insurance policy as being a share of stock.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.1; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1990, c. 265.
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
The plain meaning of this section, § 38.2-503 and § 38.2-510 show that the primary purpose of these sections is to regulate the performance of insurance contracts by assuring conformity between representations made by the insurer to the insured and the actual performance of the insurance policies. In other words, each statute is designed to regulate the representations made to form, and the practices which comprise, the relationship between insurer and insured and the performance of the insurance contract which is the foundation of that relationship. Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc., 891 F. Supp. 1153, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9070 (E.D. Va. 1995).
Federal preemption of state laws in relation to employee benefit plans. —
State laws, insofar as they are invoked by beneficiaries claiming relief for injuries arising out of the administration of employee benefit plans, “relate to” such plans and, absent an applicable exemption, are preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Claims for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and for violations of the Virginia Unfair Trade Practices Act, both of which purport to impose duties on insurers, are not rescued from preemption by an “insurance saving clause,” in 29 U.S.C. § 1144(b)(2)(A), since the insurance saving clause is limited by the so-called “deemer clause,” which provides that no employee benefit plan shall be deemed to be an insurance company or other insurer or to be engaged in the business of insurance for purposes of any law of any State purporting to regulate insurance companies or insurance contracts. Powell v. C & P Tel. Co., 780 F.2d 419, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25723 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170, 106 S. Ct. 2892, 90 L. Ed. 2d 980, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1645 (1986).
§ 38.2-503. False information and advertising generally.
No person shall knowingly make, publish, disseminate, circulate, or place before the public, or cause or knowingly allow, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed before the public in a newspaper, magazine or other publication, or in the form of a notice, circular, pamphlet, letter or poster, or over any radio or television station, or in any other way, an advertisement, announcement or statement containing any assertion, representation or statement relating to (i) the business of insurance or (ii) any person in the conduct of his insurance business, which is untrue, deceptive or misleading.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.2; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
The plain meaning of this section, § 38.2-502 and § 38.2-510 show that the primary purpose of these sections is to regulate the performance of insurance contracts by assuring conformity between representations made by the insurer to the insured and the actual performance of the insurance policies. In other words, each statute is designed to regulate the representations made to form, and the practices which comprise, the relationship between insurer and insured and the performance of the insurance contract which is the foundation of that relationship. Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc., 891 F. Supp. 1153, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9070 (E.D. Va. 1995).
§ 38.2-504. Defamation.
No person shall make, publish, disseminate, or circulate, directly or indirectly, or aid, abet or encourage the making, publishing, disseminating or circulating of any oral or written statement or any pamphlet, circular, article or literature that is false, and maliciously critical of, or derogatory to, any person with respect to the business of insurance or with respect to any person in the conduct of his insurance business and that is calculated to injure that person.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.3; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-505. Boycott, coercion and intimidation.
No person shall enter into any agreement to commit, or by any concerted action commit, any act of boycott, coercion or intimidation resulting in or tending to result in unreasonable restraint of, or monopoly in, the business of insurance.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.4; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Boycott requires coercion. —
Where a purchaser has a free choice of a product in a competitive market, his acceptance of an offer to deal cannot constitute an antitrust boycott since a “boycott” requires duress or coercion. Anglin v. Blue Shield, 510 F. Supp. 75, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9628 (W.D. Va. 1981), aff'd, 693 F.2d 315, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24154 (4th Cir. 1982).
§ 38.2-506. False statements and entries.
No person shall:
- Knowingly file with any supervisory or other public official, or knowingly make, publish, disseminate, circulate, or deliver to any person, or place before the public, or knowingly cause, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, delivered to any person, or placed before the public, any false material statement of fact as to the financial condition of a person; or
- Knowingly make any false entry of a material fact in any book, report or statement of any person or knowingly fail to make a true entry of any material fact pertaining to the business of any person in any book, report or statement of that person.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.5; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-507. Stock operations and advisory board contracts.
No person shall issue or deliver or permit agents, officers, or employees to issue or deliver capital stock, benefit certificates or shares in any corporation, securities, any special or advisory board contracts or any contract promising returns and profits as an inducement to insurance.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.6; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-508. Unfair discrimination.
No person shall:
- Unfairly discriminate or permit any unfair discrimination between individuals of the same class and equal expectation of life (i) in the rates charged for any life insurance or annuity contract, or (ii) in the dividends or other benefits payable on the contract, or (iii) in any other of the terms and conditions of the contract;
- Unfairly discriminate or permit any unfair discrimination between individuals of the same class and of essentially the same hazard (i) in the amount of premium, policy fees, or rates charged for any policy or contract of accident or health insurance, (ii) in the benefits payable under such policy or contract, (iii) in any of the terms or conditions of such policy or contract, or (iv) in any other manner;
- Refuse to insure, refuse to continue to insure, or limit the amount, extent or kind of insurance coverage available to an individual, or charge an individual a different rate for the same coverage solely because of blindness, or partial blindness, or mental or physical impairments, unless the refusal, limitation or rate differential is based on sound actuarial principles. This paragraph shall not be interpreted to modify any other provision of law relating to the termination, modification, issuance or renewal of any insurance policy or contract;
-
Unfairly discriminate or permit any unfair discrimination between individuals or risks of the same class and of essentially the same hazards by refusing to issue, refusing to renew, cancelling or limiting the amount of insurance coverage solely because
of the geographic location of the individual or risk, unless:
- The refusal, cancellation or limitation is for a business purpose that is not a mere pretext for unfair discrimination; or
- The refusal, cancellation or limitation is required by law or regulatory mandate;
-
Make or permit any unfair discrimination between individuals or risks of the same class and of essentially the same hazards by refusing to issue, refusing to renew, cancelling or limiting the amount of insurance coverage on a residential property risk,
or the personal property contained in a residential property risk, solely because of the age of the residential property, unless:
- The refusal, cancellation or limitation is for a business purpose that is not a mere pretext for unfair discrimination; or
- The refusal, cancellation or limitation is required by law or regulatory mandate;
- Refuse to issue or renew any individual accident and sickness insurance policy or contract for coverage over and above any lifetime benefit of a group accident and sickness policy or contract solely because an individual is insured under a group accident and sickness insurance policy or contract, provided that medical expenses covered by both individual and group coverage shall be paid first by the group policy or contract to the extent of the group coverage; or
-
Consider the status of a victim of domestic violence as a criterion in any decision with regard to insurance underwriting, pricing, renewal, scope of coverage, or payment of claims on any and all insurance defined in §
38.2-100
and further classified in Article 2 (§
38.2-101
et seq.) of Chapter 1 of this title, other than (i) legal services plans as provided for in Chapter 44 (§
38.2-4400
et seq.) of this title and (ii) the insurance classified in §§
38.2-110
through
38.2-133
. The term “domestic violence” means the occurrence of one or more of the following acts by a current or former family member, household member as defined in § 16.1-228, person against whom the victim obtained a
protective order or caretaker:
- Attempting to cause or causing or threatening another person physical harm, severe emotional distress, psychological trauma, rape or sexual assault;
- Engaging in a course of conduct or repeatedly committing acts toward another person, including following the person without proper authority, under circumstances that place the person in reasonable fear of bodily injury or physical harm;
- Subjecting another person to false imprisonment; or
- Attempting to cause or causing damage to property so as to intimidate or attempt to control the behavior of another person.Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit an insurer or insurance professional from asking about a medical condition or from using medical information to underwrite or to carry out its duties under an insurance policy even if the medical information is related to a medical condition that the insurer or insurance professional knows or has reason to know resulted from domestic violence, to the extent otherwise permitted under this section and other applicable law.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.7; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1993, c. 130; 2001, c. 34; 2013, cc. 136, 210.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 34 added subdivision 7.
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendments by cc. 136 and 210, effective January 1, 2014, are identical and deleted “This subsection shall not apply to individual policies or contracts issued or renewed pursuant to § 38.2-4216.1 ” preceding “; or” at the end of subdivision 6.
Law Review.
For article, “Family Law,” see 35 U. Rich. L. Rev. 651 (2001).
CASE NOTES
This section creates no private cause of action. Salomon v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 801 F.2d 659, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30863 (4th Cir. 1986).
§ 38.2-508.1. Unfair discrimination; members of the armed forces.
- No person shall refuse to issue or refuse to continue a life insurance policy on the life of any member of the United States Armed Forces, the Reserves of the United States Armed Forces or the National Guard due to (i) their status as a member of any such military organization or (ii) their duty assignment while a member of any such military organization.
- In circumstances where an individual’s or family member’s coverage under a group life or group health insurance policy or contract was terminated due to such individual’s status as a member of the United States Armed Forces, the Reserves of the United States Armed Forces or the National Guard, no person shall refuse to reinstate such coverage, regardless of continuation, renewal, reissue or replacement of the group insurance policy, upon the occurrence of the individual’s return to eligibility status under the policy or contract. Such reinstated coverage shall not contain any new preexisting condition or other exclusions or limitations except that the remainder of a preexisting condition requirement that was not satisfied prior to termination of the individual’s coverage resulting from such military status may be applied once the individual returns and coverage under the group policy is reinstated.
- The provisions of this section shall not apply in any instance in which the provisions of this section are inconsistent or in conflict with a provision of Article 6 (§ 38.2-3438 et seq.) of Chapter 34.
History. 1991, cc. 663, 678; 2013, c. 751.
The 2013 amendments.
The 2013 amendment by c. 751, effective January 1, 2014, added subsection C.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10B M.J. Insurance, § 82.
§ 38.2-508.2. Discrimination prohibited.
No person shall refuse to issue or refuse to continue a life insurance policy on the life of any individual solely because of that individual’s race, color, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national origin, or sex.
History. 1993, c. 152; 2020, c. 1137.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 1137 substituted “sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national origin, or sex” for “religion, national origin, or gender.”
§ 38.2-508.3. Consideration of Medicaid eligibility prohibited.
- No person shall, in determining the eligibility of an individual for coverage under an individual or group accident and sickness policy, health services plan or health maintenance organization contract, consider the eligibility of such individual for medical assistance (“Medicaid”) from this Commonwealth or from any other state.
- No person shall, in determining benefits payable to, or on behalf of an individual covered under an individual or group accident and sickness policy, health services plan or health maintenance organization contract, take into account the eligibility of such individual for medical assistance (“Medicaid”) from this Commonwealth or from any other state.
History. 1994, c. 213.
§ 38.2-508.4. Genetic information privacy.
- As used in this section:“Genetic characteristic” means any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or alteration thereof, which is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder, or determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and which is asymptomatic of any disease or disorder.“Genetic information” means information about genes, gene products, or inherited characteristics that may derive from an individual or a family member.“Genetic test” means a test for determining the presence or absence of genetic characteristics in an individual in order to diagnose a genetic characteristic.
-
No person proposing to issue, re-issue, or renew any policy, contract, or plan of accident and sickness insurance defined in §
38.2-109
, but excluding disability income insurance, issued by any (i) insurer providing hospital, medical and surgical or major medical coverage on an expense incurred basis, (ii) corporation providing a health services
plan, or (iii) health maintenance organization providing a health care plan for health care services shall, on the basis of any genetic information obtained concerning an individual or on the individual’s request for genetic services,
with respect to such policy, contract, or plan:
- Terminate, restrict, limit, or otherwise apply conditions to coverage of an individual or restrict the sale to an individual;
- Cancel or refuse to renew the coverage of an individual;
- Exclude an individual from coverage;
- Impose a waiting period prior to commencement of coverage of an individual;
- Require inclusion of a rider that excludes coverage for certain benefits and services; or
- Establish differentials in premium rates for coverage.In addition, no discrimination shall be made in the fees or commissions of an agent or agency for an enrollment, a subscription, or the renewal of an enrollment or subscription of any person on the basis of a person’s genetic characteristics which may, under some circumstances, be associated with disability in that person or that person’s offspring.
- Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, all information obtained from genetic screening or testing conducted prior to the repeal of this section shall be confidential and shall not be made public nor used in any way, in whole or in part, to cancel, refuse to issue or renew, or limit benefits under any policy, contract or plan subject to the provisions of this section.
History. 1996, c. 704.
Cross references.
For provision prohibiting use of genetic testing or genetic characteristics as a condition of employment, see § 40.1-28.7:1 .
Editor’s note.
Acts 1996, ch. 704, cl. 2, which provided for the expiration of this section on July 1, 1998, was repealed by Acts 1998, ch. 356, cl. 1.
§ 38.2-508.5. Re-underwriting individual under existing group or individual accident and sickness insurance policy prohibited; exceptions.
- No premium increase, including a reduced premium increase in the form of a discount, may be implemented for an insured individual under existing individual health insurance coverage as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 subsequent to the initial effective date of coverage under such policy or certificate to the extent that such premium increase is determined based upon: (i) a change in a health-status-related factor of the individual insured as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 or (ii) the past or prospective claim experience of the individual insured.
- No reduction in benefits may be implemented for an insured individual under existing individual health insurance coverage as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 subsequent to the initial effective date of coverage under such policy or certificate to the extent that such reduction in benefits is determined based upon: (i) a change in a health-status-related factor of the individual insured as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 or (ii) the past or prospective claim experience of the individual insured.
- No modifications to contractual terms and conditions may be implemented for an insured individual under existing individual health insurance coverage as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 subsequent to the initial effective date of coverage under such policy or certificate to the extent that such modifications to contractual terms and conditions are determined based upon: (i) a change in a health-status-related factor of the individual insured as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 or (ii) the past or prospective claim experience of the individual insured.
-
This section shall not prohibit adjustments to premium, rescission of, or amendments to the insurance contract in the following circumstances:
- When an insurer learns of information subsequent to issuing the policy or certificate that was not disclosed in the underwriting process and that, had it been known, would have resulted in a higher premium level or denial of coverage. Any adjustment to premium or rescission of coverage made for this reason may be made only to extent that it would have been made had the information been disclosed in the application process, and shall not be imposed beyond any period of incontestability, or beyond any time period proscribing an insurer from asserting defenses based upon misstatements in applications, as otherwise may be provided by applicable law. Any such rescission shall be consistent with § 38.2-3430.3 regarding guaranteed availability.
- When an insurer provides a lifestyle-based good health discount based upon an individual’s adherence to a healthy lifestyle and this discount is not based upon a specific health condition or diagnosis.
- When an insurer removes waivers or riders attached to the policy at issue that limit coverage for specific named pre-existing medical conditions.
- For purposes of this section, re-underwriting means the reevaluation of any health-status-related factor of an individual for purposes of adjusting premiums, benefits or contractual terms as provided in subsections A, B, and C.
- The provisions of this section shall not apply to individual health insurance coverage issued to members of a bona fide association, as defined in subsection B of § 38.2-3431 , where coverage is available to all members of the association and eligible dependents of such members without regard to any health-status-related factor.
- The provisions of this section shall not apply in any instance in which the provisions of this section are inconsistent or in conflict with a provision of Article 6 (§ 38.2-3438 et seq.) of Chapter 34.
History. 2003, c. 699; 2011, c. 882.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2013, c. 751, cl. 4, repealed Acts 2011, c. 882, cl. 2, which would have made amendments by Acts 2011, c. 882, expire on July 1, 2014.
The 2011 amendments.
The 2011 amendment by c. 882 deleted “of this section” at the end of subsection E; and added subsection G. See Editor’s note.
§ 38.2-509. Rebates.
-
Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, no person shall:
- Knowingly permit, offer, or make any insurance or annuity contract or agreement which is not plainly expressed in the contract issued;
- Pay, allow or give, or offer to pay, allow or give, directly or indirectly, as inducement to any insurance or annuity contract, any rebate of premium payable on the contract, any special favor or advantage in the dividends or other benefits on the contract, any valuable consideration or inducement not specified in the contract, except in accordance with an applicable rating plan authorized for use in this Commonwealth;
- Give, sell, purchase, or offer to give, sell or purchase as inducement to insurance, or annuity contracts, or in connection with such contracts, any stocks, bonds, or other securities of any company, any dividends or profits accrued on any stocks, bonds or other securities of any company, or anything of value not specified in the contract; or
- Receive or accept as inducement to insurance, or annuity contracts, any rebate of premium payable on the contract, any special favor or advantage in the dividends or other benefit to accrue on the contract, or any valuable consideration or inducement not specified in the contract.
-
Nothing in §
38.2-508
or in this section shall be construed to include within the definition of discrimination or rebates any of the following practices:
- In the case of any life insurance or annuity contract, paying bonuses to policyholders or otherwise abating their premiums in whole or in part out of surplus accumulated from nonparticipating insurance if the bonuses or abatement of premiums are fair and equitable to policyholders and in the best interests of the insurer and its policyholders;
- In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance policies issued on the industrial debit plan, making allowance to policyholders who, for a specified period, have continuously made premium payments directly to an office of the insurer in an amount that fairly represents the savings in collection expense;
- Readjustment of the rate of premium for a group insurance policy based on the loss or expense experience under the policy, at the end of the first or any subsequent policy year of insurance;
- In the case of insurers, allowing their bona fide employees to receive a reduction on the premiums paid by them on policies or contracts on their own lives and property, and on the lives and property of their spouses and dependent children;
- Issuing life or accident and sickness policies or annuity contracts on a salary savings or payroll deduction plan at a reduced rate consistent with the savings made by the use of such plan;
- Paying commissions or other compensation to duly licensed agents or brokers; or
- Allowing or returning to participating policyholders, members or subscribers, dividends, savings or unabsorbed premium payments.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.8; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-510. Unfair claim settlement practices.
-
No person shall commit or perform with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice any of the following:
- Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;
- Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies;
- Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims arising under insurance policies;
- Refusing arbitrarily and unreasonably to pay claims;
- Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss statements have been completed;
- Not attempting in good faith to make prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear;
- Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by such insureds;
- Attempting to settle claims for less than the amount to which a reasonable man would have believed he was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material accompanying or made part of an application;
- Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application that was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured;
- Making claims payments to insureds or beneficiaries not accompanied by a statement setting forth the coverage under which payments are being made;
- Making known to insureds or claimants a policy of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration;
- Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured, a claimant, or the physician of either to submit a preliminary claim report and then requiring the subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, when both contain substantially the same information;
- Failing to promptly settle claims where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage;
- Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or applicable law for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement;
- Failing to comply with § 38.2-3407.15 , or to perform any provider contract provision required by that section;
- Payment to an insurer or its representative by a repair facility, or acceptance by an insurer or its representative from a repair facility, directly or indirectly, of any kickback, rebate, commission, thing of value, or other consideration in connection with such person’s appraisal service; or
- Making appraisals of the cost of repairing a motor vehicle that has been damaged as a result of a covered loss unless such appraisal is based upon a personal inspection by a representative of the repair facility or a representative of the insurer who is making the appraisal. Notwithstanding the requirement that an appraisal be based upon a personal inspection, the repair facility or the insurer making the appraisal may prepare an initial, which may be the final, repair appraisal on a motor vehicle that has been damaged as a result of a covered loss either from the representative’s personal inspection of the motor vehicle or from photographs, videos, or electronically transmitted digital imagery of the motor vehicle; however, no insurer may require an owner of a motor vehicle to submit photographs, videos, or electronically transmitted digital imagery as a condition of an appraisal. Supplemental repair estimates that become necessary after the repair work has been initiated due to discovery of additional damage to the motor vehicle may also be made from photographs, videos, or electronically transmitted digital imagery of the motor vehicle, provided that in the case of disputed repairs a personal inspection is required.
- No violation of this section shall of itself be deemed to create any cause of action in favor of any person other than the Commission; but nothing in this subsection shall impair the right of any person to seek redress at law or equity for any conduct for which action may be brought.
-
- No insurer shall prepare or use an estimate of the cost of automobile repairs based on the use of an after market part, as defined herein, unless:The insurer discloses to the claimant in writing either on the estimate or in a separate document attached to the estimate the following information:“THIS ESTIMATE HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON THE USE OF AUTOMOBILE PARTS NOT MADE BY THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER. PARTS USED IN THE REPAIR OF YOUR VEHICLE BY OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER ARE REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST EQUAL IN LIKE KIND AND QUALITY IN TERMS OF FIT, QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE TO THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER PARTS THEY ARE REPLACING.” C. 1. No insurer shall prepare or use an estimate of the cost of automobile repairs based on the use of an after market part, as defined herein, unless:The insurer discloses to the claimant in writing either on the estimate or in a separate document attached to the estimate the following information:“THIS ESTIMATE HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON THE USE OF AUTOMOBILE PARTS NOT MADE BY THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER. PARTS USED IN THE REPAIR OF YOUR VEHICLE BY OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER ARE REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST EQUAL IN LIKE KIND AND QUALITY IN TERMS OF FIT, QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE TO THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER PARTS THEY ARE REPLACING.”
- “After market part” as used in this section shall mean an automobile part which is not made by the original equipment manufacturer and which is a sheet metal or plastic part generally constituting the exterior of a motor vehicle, including inner and outer panels.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.9; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1988, c. 29; 1999, cc. 709, 739; 2000, c. 187; 2001, c. 335; 2016, cc. 183, 286.
The 1999 amendments.
The 1999 amendments by cc. 709 and 739 are identical, and in subsection A, deleted “or” at the end of subdivision 13, inserted “or” at the end of subdivision 14, and added subdivision 15.
The 2000 amendments.
The 2000 amendment by c. 187 substituted “38.2-3407.15” for “38.2-3407.13” in subdivision A 15.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 335, in subsection A, deleted “or” at the end of subdivision 14 and added subdivisions 16 and 17.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendments by cc. 183 and 286 are identical, and in subdivision A 17, substituted “a motor vehicle” for “an automobile” and “covered loss” for “collision” and inserted “a representative of” in the first sentence and added the last two sentences.
Law Review.
For comment, “Insurers’ Liability for Excess Judgments in Virginia: Negligence or Bad Faith,” see 15 U. Rich. L. Rev. 153 (1980).
For article, “On Opioids and ERISA: The Urgent Case for a Federal Ban on Discretionary Clauses,” see 53 U. Rich. L. Rev. 687 (2019).
Research References.
Virginia Forms (Matthew Bender). No. 1-901 Complaint on a Fire Insurance Policy.
CASE NOTES
Purpose. —
The plain meaning of this section, § 38.2-502 and § 38.2-503 shows that the primary purpose of these sections is to regulate the performance of insurance contracts by assuring conformity between representations made by the insurer to the insured and the actual performance of the insurance policies. In other words, each statute is designed to regulate the representations made to form, and the practices which comprise, the relationship between insurer and insured and the performance of the insurance contract which is the foundation of that relationship. Ambrose v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., Inc., 891 F. Supp. 1153, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9070 (E.D. Va. 1995).
The Virginia Unfair Insurance Practices Act does not establish a private cause of action. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987).
An award of punitive damages may not rest on a jury finding that defendant violated the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987).
Bad faith of insurer. —
An insured may be awarded attorney’s fees generated in a suit against its insurer for a determination of coverage under the policy if it shows that the insurer, not acting in good faith, denied coverage or failed or refused to make payment to the insured under the policy, or an insured may seek the imposition of penalties for insurer’s violations of the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. UTF Carriers, Inc., 790 F. Supp. 637, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5941 (W.D. Va. 1992), dismissed, No. 89-0038-C, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16341 (W.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1992).
Liability for bad faith conduct as matter of contract rather than tort. —
In a first-party Virginia insurance relationship, liability for bad faith conduct is a matter of contract rather than tort law. The obligation arises from the agreement and extends only to situations connected with the agreement. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987).
An insured does not state a tort claim by charging that an insurer was actuated by bad faith in breaching the contract of insurance. A & E Supply Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 798 F.2d 669, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28177 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091, 107 S. Ct. 1302, 94 L. Ed. 2d 158, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 746 (1987).
Punitive damages not authorized. —
The Virginia legislature has provided for punishment and deterrence without authorizing punitive damages against errant insurance companies. Bettius & Sanderson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 839 F.2d 1009, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2131 (4th Cir. 1988).
Subdivision A 6 of this section applies only when the failure to make good faith attempts to settle claims occurs with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice on the part of an insurer. Allstate Ins. Co. v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 249 Va. 9 , 452 S.E.2d 859, 1995 Va. LEXIS 3 (1995).
Isolated incidents are insufficient to make insurer’s conduct “a general business practice.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 249 Va. 9 , 452 S.E.2d 859, 1995 Va. LEXIS 3 (1995).
Duty to defend found. —
Insurer had a duty to defend the insured based on the allegations in the third-party complaint against the insured and the four corners of the insurance policy, and neither the contract nor the professional services exclusions relieved it of the duty to defend. If the insurer believed it ultimately had no duty to indemnify the insured because of these exclusions, it should have defended under a reservation of rights; the insurer was thus liable to the insured for its costs and attorneys fees associated with defending the underlying complaint. Capitol Envtl. Servs. v. N. River Ins. Co., 536 F. Supp. 2d 633, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15653 (E.D. Va. 2008).
§ 38.2-511. Failure to maintain record of complaints.
No person other than agents or brokers, shall fail to maintain a complete record of all the complaints that it has received since the date of its last examination under § 38.2-1317 , provided that the records of complaints of a health carrier subject to Chapter 58 (§ 38.2-5800 et seq.) of this title shall be retained for no less than five years. The record shall indicate the total number of complaints, their classification by line of insurance, the nature of each complaint, the disposition of these complaints, and the time it took to process each complaint.
As used in this section, “complaint” shall mean any written communication from a policyholder, subscriber or claimant primarily expressing a grievance.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.10; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1998, c. 891.
The 1998 amendment, in the first paragraph, in the first sentence, substituted “provided that the records of complaints of a health carrier subject to Chapter 58 (§ 38.2-5800 et seq.) of this title shall be retained for no less than five years” for “or during the last three years, whichever is the more recent time period.”
§ 38.2-512. Misrepresentation in insurance documents or communications.
- No person shall make or cause or allow to be made false or fraudulent statements or representations on or relative to an application or any document or communication relating to the business of insurance for the purpose of obtaining a fee, commission, money, or other benefit from any insurer, agent, broker, premium finance company, or individual.
- No person shall, with respect to any document pertaining to the business of insurance, including payments made to an insurer or by an insurer, affix or cause or allow to be affixed the signature of any other person to such document without the written authorization of the person whose signature appears on such document.
- No person shall, with respect to any document pertaining to the business of insurance, obtain or cause or allow to be obtained by false pretense the signature of another person or utilize such signature for the purpose of altering, changing or effecting the benefits, advantages, terms or conditions of any insurance contract or document related thereto, including payments made to an insurer or by an insurer.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.11; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1998, c. 12.
The 1998 amendment rewrote subsection A and added subsections B and C.
§ 38.2-513. Repealed by Acts 2001, c. 371.
§ 38.2-513.1. Insurance sales by depository institutions and other lending institutions.
-
No depository institution, in the sale or solicitation of insurance, shall:
- Reject an insurance policy required in connection with a loan or extension of credit solely because the policy has been issued or underwritten by a person who is not associated with such depository institution or its affiliate;
- Require a debtor, insurer, agent, or surplus lines broker to pay a separate charge in connection with the handling of insurance required in connection with a loan or extension of credit or other banking product, unless such charge would be required when the depository institution or its affiliate is the licensed agent or surplus lines broker;
- Use any advertisement that would cause a reasonable person to believe mistakenly that (i) the federal government or the Commonwealth is responsible for the insurance sales activities of, or stands behind the credit of, the depository institution or its affiliate; or (ii) the federal government or the Commonwealth guarantees any returns on insurance products or is a source of payment on any insurance obligation of or sold by the depository institution or its affiliate;
- Act as an agent unless licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18 (§ 38.2-1800 et seq.) of this title;
- Pay or receive commissions or other valuable consideration except in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18 (§ 38.2-1800 et seq.) of this title; however, nothing herein shall prohibit the payment of compensation to a person not licensed under Chapter 18 (§ 38.2-1800 et seq.) of this title for the referral of a customer, provided that (i) such compensation is not based on the purchase of insurance by the customer, (ii) such compensation is a one-time, nominal fee of a fixed dollar amount for each referral, and (iii) the referral does not include a discussion of specific insurance policy terms and conditions;
- Release insurance information of a customer to any person other than an officer, director, employee, agent, or affiliate of the depository institution, for the purpose of soliciting or selling insurance, without the express written consent of the customer. This provision shall not apply to (i) the release of information as otherwise authorized by state or federal law or (ii) the transfer of insurance information to an unaffiliated insurer in connection with transferring insurance in force on existing insureds of the depository institution or its affiliate, or in connection with a merger with or acquisition of an unaffiliated insurer. A depository institution or its affiliate shall be deemed to be in compliance with this paragraph if it complies with Chapter 6 (§ 38.2-600 et seq.) of this title;
- Use, disclose, or release health information obtained from the insurance records of a customer for any purpose other than for its activities as a licensed agent or surplus lines broker, without the express written consent of the customer. A depository institution or its affiliate shall be deemed to be in compliance with this paragraph if it complies with Chapter 6 (§ 38.2-600 et seq.) of this title;
-
Extend credit or provide any product or service that is equivalent to an extension of credit, lease or sell property of any kind, furnish any services, or fix or vary the consideration for any of the foregoing on the condition or requirement that the
customer obtain insurance from the depository institution or its affiliate, or a particular insurer, agent, or surplus lines broker; except that nothing shall prohibit the depository institution or its affiliate from:
- Engaging in any activity that would not violate section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970, as interpreted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or
- Informing a customer that (i) insurance is required in order to obtain a loan or credit approval; (ii) the loan or credit approval is contingent upon the procurement by the customer of acceptable insurance; or (iii) insurance is available from the depository institution or its affiliate;
- Offer, sell, or require insurance in connection with a loan or extension of credit, when an application for a loan or extension of credit from a depository institution is pending, unless a written disclosure is given to the customer indicating that the customer’s choice of an insurer will not affect the credit decision or credit terms in any way; provided, however, that the depository institution may impose reasonable requirements concerning the creditworthiness of the insurer and the scope of coverage chosen. Any disapproval of an insurer shall be deemed unreasonable if it is not based on reasonable standards uniformly applied, relating to the extent of coverage required and the financial soundness and the services of an insurer. Such standards shall not discriminate against any particular type of insurer, nor shall such standards call for disapproval of an insurance policy because the policy contains coverage in addition to that required by the creditor. Use of the ratings of a nationally recognized rating service shall not be deemed unreasonable provided such ratings are based on reasonable standards uniformly applied. If an insurer, duly licensed in Virginia, does not possess the required rating of a nationally recognized rating service, no person who lends money or extends credit shall refuse to accept from the insurer a certificate of 100 percent reinsurance issued by another insurer pursuant to § 38.2-136 , which does possess the required rating;
-
Sell an insurance policy unless:
- A clear and conspicuous disclosure is given, in writing, where practicable, to the customer prior to the sale stating that such insurance policy (i) is not a deposit; (ii) is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other federal government agency; (iii) is not guaranteed by the depository institution or, if appropriate, its affiliate or any person soliciting or selling insurance on its premises; and (iv) where appropriate, involves investment risk, including the potential loss of principal, and
- Written acknowledgment of the disclosure is obtained from the customer at the time the customer receives the disclosure or at the time of the initial purchase of the insurance policy;
- Solicit or sell insurance, other than credit insurance or flood insurance, unless such solicitation or sale is completed through documents separate from any credit transactions;
- Include the expense of insurance premiums, other than credit insurance premiums, title insurance premiums, or flood insurance premiums, in the primary credit transaction without the express written consent of the customer; or
- Solicit or sell insurance unless (i) its insurance sales activities are, to the extent practicable, physically segregated from areas where retail deposits are routinely accepted; (ii) it maintains separate and distinct books and records relating to such insurance transactions for the three previous calendar years; and (iii) it makes all such books and records available to the Commission for inspection upon reasonable notice.
- As used in this section:“Affiliate” means any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another company.“Credit insurance” means the lines of insurance defined in §§ 38.2-103 , 38.2-108 , 38.2-122.1 , and 38.2-122.2 .“Customer” means an individual who obtains, applies for, or is solicited to obtain insurance.“Depository institution” means any bank or savings association.“Insurance information” means information concerning the premiums, terms, and conditions of insurance coverage, including expiration dates and rates, and insurance claims of a customer contained in the records of a depository institution or its affiliate.
- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the provisions of this section, except subdivision A. 10., shall also apply to any person who lends money or extends credit and who sells or solicits any insurance as classified and defined in Article 2 (§ 38.2-101 et seq.) of Chapter 1 of this title in connection therewith. However, this section shall not apply to premium finance companies licensed under Chapter 47 (§ 38.2-4700 et seq.) of this title or agents who extend credit as authorized in § 38.2-1806 to the extent that such premium finance companies or agents are not affiliated with a depository institution.
- If the customer agrees, the written disclosures and acknowledgements required by subsection A of this section may be provided electronically. Such disclosures shall be provided in a format that the customer may retain and reproduce for later reference. When a purchase of insurance is made by telephone, the disclosures and acknowledgements required by subsection A of this section may be given orally, provided that (i) such disclosures are mailed or provided in electronic form within three working days after the sale, solicitation, or offer of the insurance policy; (ii) documentation is maintained showing that oral acknowledgement was given by the customer; and (iii) a reasonable effort is made to obtain written acknowledgement from the customer.
- The Commission shall have the power to examine and investigate the affairs of any person to whom this section applies to determine whether that person has violated this section. If a violation of this section is found, the person in violation shall be subject to the same procedures and penalties as are applicable to other provisions of this chapter.
- Except as provided for specifically in subsection A, this section shall not prevent or restrict a depository institution or its affiliate from engaging directly or indirectly, either by itself or in conjunction with an affiliate, or any other person, in any activity authorized or permitted under state or federal law.
History. 2001, c. 371; 2002, c. 76.
Editor’s note.
Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970, as referred to in subdivision A 8 above, is codified as 12 U.S.C.S. § 1971.
The 2002 amendments.
The 2002 amendment by c. 76 deleted “in connection with any lending of money or extension of credit” following “policy” in subdivision A 10.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 10A M.J. Insurance, § 2.
§ 38.2-514. Failure to make disclosure.
- No person shall sell, solicit, or negotiate the sale of an annuity, a life insurance policy or an accident and sickness insurance policy without furnishing the disclosure information required by any rules and regulations of the Commission.
- No person shall provide to an insured, claimant, subscriber or enrollee under an accident and sickness insurance policy, subscription contract, or health maintenance organization contract, an explanation of benefits which does not clearly and accurately disclose the method of benefit calculation and the actual amount which has been or will be paid to the provider of services.
History. Code 1950, § 38.1-52; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-52.13; 1977, c. 529; 1978, c. 441; 1979, c. 324; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1991, c. 620; 1992, c. 7; 1994, c. 320; 2001, cc. 371, 706.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371 deleted subsection B, which formerly read: “Any lending institution, bank holding company, savings institution holding company or subsidiary or affiliate of either the lending institution or holding company, including any officer or employee thereof, licensed as an insurance agency or insurance agent in this Commonwealth shall, prior to the sale of any policy of life insurance in which there is or will be an accumulation of cash value during the term of the policy, make a written disclosure to the purchaser of the policy’s ‘interest adjusted net cost index’ in compliance with regulations or forms approved by the Commission,” and redesignated former subsection C as subsection B.
The 2001 amendment by c. 706, effective September 1, 2002, substituted “sell, solicit, or negotiate” for “solicit, or effect” in subsection A; and also deleted subsection B; and redesignated former subsection C as subsection B.
§ 38.2-514.1. Disclosure required.
-
Any agent selling, soliciting, or negotiating a contract of insurance in conjunction with any automobile club service agreement or in conjunction with any accidental death and dismemberment policy shall provide to the applicant, at the time of application,
a written disclosure which shall contain:
- The name or type of each policy or contract of insurance and automobile club service agreement for which application has been made;
- The premium quotation associated with each policy or contract of insurance and the cost of any dues, assessments or periodic payments of money associated with each automobile club service agreement for which application has been made; and
- A statement that the applicant has elected to purchase such policies, contracts, or automobile club service agreements.
- The disclosure required by this section shall be signed and dated by the agent and the applicant. A copy of the signed disclosure shall be given to the applicant at the time of application. If the application is made by telephonic or electronic request, a copy of the disclosure shall be signed and dated by the agent and shall be mailed to the applicant within ten calendar days of the application.
- The provisions of this section shall apply only to the original issuance of policies or contracts of insurance and automobile club service agreements covering personal, family, or household needs rather than business or professional needs. As used in this section, an automobile club service agreement is an agreement issued by an automobile club as defined in subsection E.
- Notwithstanding subsections A, B and C, this section shall not apply to the sale of group insurance.
- As used in this section, “automobile club” means a legal entity that, in consideration of dues, assessments, or periodic payments of money, promises its members or subscribers to assist them in matters relating to motor travel or the operation, use, or maintenance of a motor vehicle by supplying services that may include, but are not limited to, towing service, emergency road service, indemnification service, guaranteed arrest bond certificate service, discount service, financial service, theft service, map service, or touring service.
History. 1996, c. 473; 2001, c. 706; 2016, c. 250; 2017, c. 653.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 706, effective September 1, 2002, substituted “selling, soliciting, or negotiating” for “soliciting, negotiating, procuring, or effecting” in the introductory language of subsection A; and inserted “calendar” near the end of subsection B.
The 2016 amendments.
The 2016 amendment by c. 250, in subsection C, substituted “subsection E” for “§ 13.1-400.1 ”; and added subsection E.
The 2017 amendments.
The 2017 amendment by c. 653 inserted “but are not limited to” in subsection E.
§ 38.2-514.2. Disclosures required of motor vehicle rental contract insurance agents and enrollers.
No insurance may be sold, solicited, or negotiated by a motor vehicle rental contract insurance agent or enroller unless a conspicuous written disclosure is provided to the prospective renter that (i) summarizes clearly and correctly the material terms of coverage offered, including the identity of the insurer or insurers, (ii) advises that the coverage offered may duplicate coverage already provided by the renter’s personal motor vehicle insurance policy, homeowner’s insurance policy, personal liability insurance policy, or other source of coverage, and (iii) states that the purchase of the coverages offered is not required in order to rent a motor vehicle.
History. 1998, c. 47; 1999, c. 493; 2001, c. 706.
The 1999 amendment added “or enroller” following “insurance agent.”
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 706, effective September 1, 2002, substituted “sold, solicited, or negotiated” for “solicited, negotiated, procured, or effected” near the beginning of the section.
§ 38.2-515. Power of Commission.
- The Commission shall have power to examine and investigate the affairs of each person subject to this chapter to determine whether such person has been or is engaged in any unfair method of competition or in any unfair or deceptive act or practice prohibited by this chapter.
- The Commission is further empowered to gather information from any person subject to this chapter relative to trade practices and whether such practices adequately and fairly serve the public interest.
- Any person who refuses or fails to provide information in a timely manner to the Commission as provided in this section shall be subject to the enforcement and penalty provisions set forth in Chapter 2 (§ 38.2-200 et seq.).
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-53; 1977, c. 529; 1980, c. 404; 1986, c. 562; 1991, c. 356; 2012, cc. 273, 277.
The 2012 amendments.
The 2012 amendments by cc. 273 and 277 are identical, and substituted “this chapter” for “§§ 38.2-502 through 38.2-514 ” at the end of subsection A, and deleted “of this title” at the end of subsection C.
Law Review.
For survey of Virginia law on insurance for the year 1976-77, see 63 Va. L. Rev. 1448 (1977).
§ 38.2-515.1. Power of Commission; policies issued outside of the Commonwealth.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the Commission shall have the power to assist consumers and to examine and investigate complaints and inquiries relating to trade practices and claim settlement practices of insurers involving policies issued outside of the Commonwealth but covering residents of the Commonwealth, provided that the policy was issued (i) as a policy of group accident and sickness insurance in accordance with § 38.2-3521.1 or (ii) to a group other than one described in § 38.2-3521.1 in compliance with the requirements of § 38.2-3522.1 .
- The Commission’s investigatory powers with respect to residents of the Commonwealth are limited to assisting consumers and examining and investigating complaints and inquiries as provided in subsection A and shall not extend to applying or enforcing federal laws or the laws of another state or jurisdiction.
- The Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate controversies arising out of this section.
History. 2018, c. 256.
§ 38.2-516. Prohibited compensation for intra-company replacement.
No insurer shall pay a commission or other compensation to an appointed agent who has replaced an existing individual accident and sickness policy with a policy issued by the same insurer when such new policy provides benefits substantially similar to the benefits under the replaced policy, except that an insurer may pay to such agent a commission or other compensation to the extent that the commission or other compensation does not exceed the renewal commission that would have been paid to the agent had the replaced policy continued in force.
History. 1990, c. 265.
§ 38.2-517. Unfair settlement practices; replacement and repair; penalty.
-
No person shall:
- Require an insured or claimant to utilize designated replacement or repair facilities or services, or the products of designated manufacturers, as a prerequisite to settling or paying any claim arising under a policy or policies of insurance;
- Engage in any act of coercion or intimidation causing or intended to cause an insured or claimant to utilize designated replacement or repair facilities or services, or the products of designated manufacturers, in connection with settling or paying any claim arising under a policy or policies of insurance;
- Fail to disclose to the insured or claimant, prior to being referred to a third party representative in connection with a glass claim arising under a motor vehicle insurance policy, that the third party representative is not the insurer and is acting on behalf of the insurer;
- Fail to disclose to the insured or claimant, at such time as the insurer or its third party representative recommends the use of a designated motor vehicle replacement or repair facility or service, or products of a designated manufacturer, in connection with settling or paying any claim arising under a policy or policies of insurance, that the insured or claimant is under no obligation to use the replacement or repair facility or service or products of the manufacturer recommended by the insurer or by a representative of the insurer;
- Fail to disclose to the insured or claimant, at such time as it or its third party representative recommends the use of a designated motor vehicle replacement or repair facility in connection with settling or paying any claim arising under a policy or policies of insurance, that the insurer or its third party representative has a financial interest in such replacement or repair facility, if the insurer or its third party representative has such an interest; or
- Engage in the practice of capping. As used in this subdivision, “capping” means the setting of arbitrary and unreasonable limits on what an insurer will allow as reimbursement for paint and materials.
- This section shall not be construed to require an insurer to pay an amount for motor vehicle repair services or repair products necessary to properly and fairly repair the vehicle to its pre-loss condition that is greater than the prevailing competitive charges for equivalent services or products charged by similar contractors or repair shops within a reasonable geographic or trade area of the address of the repair facility. Offering an explanation of the extent of an insurer’s obligation under this section to its policyholder or third party claimant shall not constitute a violation of this section.
- Any person violating this section shall be subject to the injunctive, penalty, and enforcement provisions of Chapter 2 (§ 38.2-200 et seq.) of this title. The Commission shall investigate, with the written authorization of the insured or the claimant, any written complaints received pursuant to this section, regardless of whether such written complaints are submitted by an individual or a repair facility. For the purpose of this section, any insurance company utilizing a third party representative shall be held accountable for any violation of this section by such third party representative.
History. 1992, cc. 870, 882; 1999, c. 129; 2003, c. 361; 2004, c. 767; 2008, cc. 111, 516.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2003, c. 361, cl. 2, provides: “That the provisions of this act shall apply to motor vehicle insurance policies issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2003.”
The 1999 amendment added the last two sentences of subsection B.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 361 added subdivisions A 3 and A 4; inserted the present subsection B; and redesignated former subsection B as subsection C.
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendment by c. 767 added subdivision A 3; redesignated former subdivisions A 4 and A 5 as subdivisions A 4 and A 5, respectively; substituted “the insurer or its third party representative recommends” for “it recommends” in present subdivision A 4; inserted “or its third party representative” three times in present subdivision 5; substituted “third party claimant” for “third-party claimant” in subsection B; in subsection C, substituted “of this section” for “of this subsection,” and inserted representative” following “third party” twice.
The 2008 amendments.
The 2008 amendments by cc. 111 and 516 are identical, and inserted subdivision A 6; and made minor stylistic changes.
§ 38.2-518. Certificates of insurance.
- As used in this section, “certificate of insurance” means a document, regardless of how titled or described, that is provided to a third party and is prepared or issued by an insurer or insurance producer as a statement or summary of an insured’s property or casualty insurance coverage. The term does not include any (i) policy of insurance, (ii) insurance binder, (iii) policy endorsement, (iv) automobile identification card, (v) certificate issued under a group or master policy, or (vi) evidence of coverage provided to a lender in a lending transaction involving a mortgage, lien, deed of trust, or other security interest in or on any real or personal property.
- No person shall issue or deliver any certificate of insurance that attempts to confer any rights upon a third party beyond what the referenced policy of insurance expressly provides.
- No certificate of insurance may represent an insurer’s obligation to give notice of cancellation or nonrenewal to a third party unless the giving of such notice is required by the policy.
- No person shall issue or deliver a certificate of insurance unless it contains a substantially similar statement to the following: “This certificate of insurance is issued as a matter of information only. It confers no rights upon the third party requesting the certificate beyond what the referenced policy of insurance expressly provides. This certificate of insurance does not extend, amend, or alter the coverage, terms, exclusions, or conditions afforded by the policy referenced in this certificate of insurance.” If a certificate of insurance is required by a state or federal agency and accurately reflects the coverage provided by the underlying policies, no such statement is required.
- No person shall knowingly demand or require the issuance of a certificate of insurance from an insurer, insurance producer, or policyholder that contains any false or misleading information concerning the policy of insurance to which the certificate makes reference.
- No person shall knowingly prepare or issue a certificate of insurance that contains any false or misleading information or that purports to affirmatively or negatively alter, amend, or extend the coverage provided by the policy of insurance to which the certificate makes reference.
- The provisions of this section shall apply to all certificate holders, policyholders, insurers, insurance producers, and certificate of insurance forms issued as a statement or summary of insurance coverages on property, operations, or risks located in the Commonwealth.
History. 2012, cc. 273, 277.
Chapter 6. Insurance Information and Privacy Protection.
Article 1. Collection, Use, and Dissemination of Information.
§ 38.2-600. Purposes.
The purposes of this article are to:
- Establish standards for the collection, use, and disclosure of information gathered in connection with insurance transactions by insurance institutions, agents or insurance-support organizations;
- Maintain a balance between the need for information by those conducting the business of insurance and the public’s need for fairness in insurance information practices, including the need to minimize intrusiveness;
- Establish a regulatory mechanism to enable natural persons to ascertain what information is being or has been collected about them in connection with insurance transactions and to have access to such information for the purpose of verifying or disputing its accuracy;
- Limit the disclosure of information collected in connection with insurance transactions; and
- Enable insurance applicants and policyholders to obtain the reasons for any adverse underwriting decision.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.3; 1986, c. 562; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” in the introductory wording.
Research References.
Bryson on Virginia Civil Procedure (Matthew Bender). Chapter 9 Discovery. § 9.04 Privileges Against Discovery. Bryson.
§ 38.2-601. Application of article.
-
The obligations imposed by this article shall apply to those insurance institutions, agents or insurance-support organizations that:
-
In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance:
- Collect, receive or maintain information in connection with insurance transactions that pertains to natural persons who are residents of the Commonwealth; or
- Engage in insurance transactions with applicants, individuals, or policyholders who are residents of the Commonwealth; and
-
In the case of property or casualty insurance:
- Collect, receive or maintain information in connection with insurance transactions involving policies, contracts or certificates of insurance delivered, issued for delivery or renewed in the Commonwealth; or
- Engage in insurance transactions involving policies, contracts or certificates of insurance delivered, issued for delivery or renewed in the Commonwealth.
-
In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance:
-
The rights granted by this article shall extend to:
-
In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance, the following persons who are residents of the Commonwealth:
- Natural persons who are the subject of information collected, received or maintained in connection with insurance transactions; and
- Applicants, individuals or policyholders who engage in or seek to engage in insurance transactions; and
-
In the case of property or casualty insurance, the following persons:
- Natural persons who are the subject of information collected, received or maintained in connection with insurance transactions involving policies, contracts or certificates of insurance delivered, issued for delivery or renewed in the Commonwealth; and
- Applicants, individuals, or policyholders who engage in or seek to engage in insurance transactions involving policies, contracts or certificates of insurance delivered, issued for delivery or renewed in the Commonwealth.
-
In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance, the following persons who are residents of the Commonwealth:
- For purposes of this section, a person shall be considered a resident of the Commonwealth if the person’s last known mailing address, as shown in the records of the insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization, is located in the Commonwealth.
- Notwithstanding subsections A and B, this article shall not apply to information collected from the public records of a governmental authority and maintained by an insurance institution or its representatives for the purpose of insuring the title to real property located in the Commonwealth.
- The provisions of this article shall apply only to insurance purchased primarily for personal, family or household purposes.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.4; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 371; 2020, c. 264.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371 added subsection E.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” wherever it appears and “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth” wherever it appears; and deleted “of this section” in subsection D following “subsections A and B.”
§ 38.2-602. Definitions.
As used in this article:
“Adverse underwriting decision” means:
-
Any of the following actions with respect to insurance transactions involving insurance coverage that is individually underwritten:
- A declination of insurance coverage;
- A termination of insurance coverage;
- Failure of an agent to apply for insurance coverage with a specific insurance institution that an agent represents and that is requested by an applicant;
-
In the case of a property or casualty insurance coverage:
- Placement by an insurance institution or agent of a risk with a residual market mechanism or an unlicensed insurer; or
- The charging of a higher rate on the basis of information that differs from that which the applicant or policyholder furnished; or
- In the case of a life or accident and sickness insurance coverage, an offer to insure at higher than standard rates, or with limitations, exceptions or benefits other than those applied for.
-
Notwithstanding subdivision 1 of this definition, the following actions shall not be considered adverse underwriting decisions, but the insurance institution or agent responsible for their occurrence shall provide the applicant or policyholder with the
specific reason or reasons for their occurrence:
- The termination of an individual policy form on a class or statewide basis;
- A declination of insurance coverage solely because such coverage is not available on a class or statewide basis;
- The rescission of a policy. “Affiliate” or “affiliated” means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another person. “Agent” shall have the meaning as set forth in § 38.2-1800 and shall include surplus lines brokers. “Applicant” means any person who seeks to contract for insurance coverage other than a person seeking group insurance that is not individually underwritten. “Clear and conspicuous notice” means a notice that is reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information in the notice. “Consumer report” means any written, oral, or other communication of information bearing on a natural person’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics or mode of living that is used or expected to be used in connection with an insurance transaction. “Consumer reporting agency” means any person who:
-
Furnishes consumer reports to other persons.
“Control,” including the terms “controlled by” or “under common control with,” means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract other than a commercial contract for goods or nonmanagement services, or otherwise, unless the power is the result of an official position with or corporate office held by the person.
“Declination of insurance coverage” means a denial, in whole or in part, by an insurance institution or agent of requested insurance coverage.
“Financial information” means personal information other than medical record information or records of payment for the provision of health care to an individual.
“Financial institution” means any institution the business of which is engaging in financial activities as described in Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. § 1843 (k)).
“Financial product or service” means any product or service that a financial holding company could offer by engaging in an activity that is financial in nature or incidental to such a financial activity under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. § 1843 (k)).
“Individual” means any natural person who:
- Is a past or present applicant;
- Is a past or present claimant;
- Derived, derives, or is proposed to derive insurance coverage under an insurance policy or certificate subject to this article;
- For the purposes of §§ 38.2-612.1 and 38.2-613 , is a beneficiary of a life insurance policy;
- For the purposes of §§ 38.2-612.1 and 38.2-613 , is a mortgagor of a mortgage covered under a mortgage guaranty insurance policy; or
- For the purposes of §§ 38.2-612.1 and 38.2-613 , is an owner of property used as security for an indebtedness for which single interest insurance is required by a lender. Notwithstanding any provision of this definition to the contrary, for purposes of § 38.2-612.1 , “individual” shall not include any natural person who is covered under an employee benefit plan, group or blanket insurance contract, or group annuity contract when the insurance institution or agent that provides such plan or contract: (i) furnishes the notice required under § 38.2-604.1 to the employee benefit plan sponsor, group or blanket insurance contract holder, or group annuity contract holder; and (ii) does not disclose the financial information of the person to a nonaffiliated third party other than as permitted under § 38.2-613 . “Institutional source” means any person or governmental entity that provides information about an individual to an agent, insurance institution or insurance-support organization, other than: “Insurance institution” means any corporation, association, partnership, reciprocal exchange, inter-insurer, Lloyd’s type of organization, fraternal benefit society, or other person engaged in the business of insurance, including health maintenance organizations, and health, legal, dental, and optometric service plans. “Insurance institution” shall not include agents or insurance-support organizations. “Insurance-support organization” means any person who regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or collecting information about natural persons for the primary purpose of providing the information to an insurance institution or agent for insurance transactions, including (i) the furnishing of consumer reports or investigative consumer reports to an insurance institution or agent for use in connection with an insurance transaction or (ii) the collection of personal information from insurance institutions, agents or other insurance-support organizations for the purpose of detecting or preventing fraud, material misrepresentation or material nondisclosure in connection with insurance underwriting or insurance claim activity. However, the following persons shall not be considered “insurance-support organizations” for purposes of this article: agents, governmental institutions, insurance institutions, medical-care institutions and medical professionals. “Insurance transaction” means any transaction involving insurance primarily for personal, family, or household needs rather than business or professional needs that entails: “Investigative consumer report” means a consumer report or a portion thereof in which information about a natural person’s character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living is obtained through personal interviews with the person’s neighbors, friends, associates, acquaintances, or others who may have knowledge concerning such items of information. “Joint marketing agreement” means a formal written contract pursuant to which an insurance institution jointly offers, endorses, or sponsors a financial product or service with another financial institution. “Life insurance” includes annuities. “Medical-care institution” means any facility or institution that is licensed to provide health care services to natural persons, including but not limited to, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home-health agencies, medical clinics, rehabilitation agencies, and public-health agencies or health-maintenance organizations. “Medical professional” means any person licensed or certified to provide health care services to natural persons, including but not limited to, a physician, dentist, nurse, chiropractor, optometrist, physical or occupational therapist, social worker, clinical dietitian, clinical psychologist, licensed professional counselor, licensed marriage and family therapist, pharmacist, or speech therapist. “Medical-record information” means personal information that: “Nonaffiliated third party” means any person who is not an affiliate of an insurance institution but does not mean (i) an agent who is selling or servicing a product on behalf of the insurance institution or (ii) a person who is employed jointly by the insurance institution and the company that is not an affiliate. “Personal information” means any individually identifiable information gathered in connection with an insurance transaction from which judgments can be made about an individual’s character, habits, avocations, finances, occupation, general reputation, credit, health, or any other personal characteristics. “Personal information” includes an individual’s name and address and medical-record information, but does not include (i) privileged information or (ii) any information that is publicly available. “Policyholder” means any person who: “Policyholder information” means personal information about a policyholder, whether in paper, electronic, or other form, that is maintained by or on behalf of an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization. “Pretext interview” means an interview whereby a person, in an attempt to obtain information about a natural person, performs one or more of the following acts: “Privileged information” means any individually identifiable information that (i) relates to a claim for insurance benefits or a civil or criminal proceeding involving an individual, and (ii) is collected in connection with or in reasonable anticipation of a claim for insurance benefits or civil or criminal proceeding involving an individual. “Residual market mechanism” means an association, organization, or other entity defined, described, or provided for in the Virginia Automobile Insurance Plan as set forth in § 38.2-2015 , or in the Virginia Property Insurance Association as set forth in Chapter 27 (§ 38.2-2700 et seq.) of this title. “Termination of insurance coverage” or “termination of an insurance policy” means either a cancellation or nonrenewal of an insurance policy other than by the policyholder’s request, in whole or in part, for any reason other than the failure to pay a premium as required by the policy. “Unlicensed insurer” means an insurance institution that has not been granted a license by the Commission to transact the business of insurance in Virginia.
1. Regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or preparing consumer reports for a monetary fee;
2. Obtains information primarily from sources other than insurance institutions; and
1. In the case of property or casualty insurance, is a past, present, or proposed named insured or certificate holder;
2. In the case of life or accident and sickness insurance, is a past, present, or proposed principal insured or certificate holder;
3. Is a past, present or proposed policyowner;
1. An agent;
2. The individual who is the subject of the information; or
3. A natural person acting in a personal capacity rather than in a business or professional capacity.
1. The determination of an individual’s eligibility for an insurance coverage, benefit or payment; or
2. The servicing of an insurance application, policy, contract, or certificate.
1. Relates to an individual’s physical or mental condition, medical history, or medical treatment; and
2. Is obtained from a medical professional or medical-care institution, from the individual, or from the individual’s spouse, parent, or legal guardian.
1. In the case of individual property or casualty insurance, is a present named insured;
2. In the case of individual life or accident and sickness insurance, is a present policyowner; or
3. In the case of group insurance that is individually underwritten, is a present group certificate holder.
1. Pretends to be someone he or she is not;
2. Pretends to represent a person he or she is not in fact representing;
3. Misrepresents the true purpose of the interview; or
4. Refuses to identify himself or herself upon request.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.5; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 371; 2003, c. 729; 2006, c. 638; 2020, c. 264.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371 added the paragraphs defining “Clear and conspicuous notice,” “Financial Information,” “Financial Institution,” and “Financial product or service”; under the paragraph defining “Individual,” deleted “or” at the end of subdivision 5, added subdivisions 7 through 9, and added the paragraph following subdivision 9; added the paragraphs defining “Joint marketing agreement,” and “Nonaffiliated third party”; in the paragraph defining “Personal information,” inserted “(i),” and inserted “or (ii) any information that is publicly available”; and deleted “However, information otherwise meeting the requirements of this subsection shall nevertheless be considered personal information under this chapter if it is disclosed in violation of § 38.2-613 of this chapter” at the end of the paragraph defining “Privileged information.”
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 729 added the paragraph defining “Policyholder information.”
The 2006 amendments.
The 2006 amendment by c. 638, in the paragraph defining “Medical professional,” deleted “psychiatric” preceding “social worker” and inserted “licensed professional counselor, licensed marriage and family therapist.”
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” wherever it appears in lowercase form.
Law Review.
For 2006 survey article, “Health Care Law,” see 41 U. Rich. L. Rev. 179 (2006).
CASE NOTES
“Applicant.” —
Insurance company wrongfully rescinded a limited liability company’s insurance policy due to material misrepresentation after learning the representative who signed the policy on behalf of the LLC had a criminal record for insurance fraud, because the term “applicant” refers only to the party seeking to purchase insurance. There was nothing in the record to suggest that the applicant was acting individually when he completed and signed the application on behalf of the LLC; the policy covered property owned by the LLC. Jeb Stuart Auction Servs., LLC v. West Am. Ins. Co., 122 F. Supp. 3d 479, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106309 (W.D. Va. 2015).
§ 38.2-603. Pretext interviews.
No insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall use or authorize the use of pretext interviews to obtain information in connection with an insurance transaction. However, a pretext interview may be undertaken to obtain information from a person or institution that does not have a generally or statutorily recognized privileged relationship with the person about whom the information relates for the purpose of investigating a claim where, based upon specific information available for review by the Commission, there is a reasonable basis for suspecting criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or material nondisclosure in connection with the claim.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.6; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-604. Notice of information collection and disclosure practices.
-
An insurance institution or agent shall provide a notice of insurance information practices to all applicants or policyholders in connection with insurance transactions as provided in this section:
-
In the case of an application for insurance a notice shall be provided no later than:
- At the time of the delivery of the insurance policy or certificate when personal information is collected only from the applicant or from public records;
- At the time the collection of personal information is initiated when personal information is collected from a source other than the applicant or public records; or
- Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 1 b of subsection A, when an application for insurance is made by telephone and personal information is collected from a source other than the applicant or public records, the notice of insurance information practices may be given orally at the time of application, provided that, if a policy is issued, such notice is given in writing or, if the applicant agrees, in electronic format, no later than at the time of the delivery of the insurance policy or certificate.
-
In the case of a policy renewal, a notice shall be provided no later than the policy renewal date, except that no notice shall be required in connection with a policy renewal if:
- Personal information is collected only from the policyholder or from public records; or
- A notice meeting the requirements of this section has been given within the previous 24 months; or
- In the case of a policy reinstatement or change in insurance benefits, a notice shall be provided no later than the time a request for a policy reinstatement or change in insurance benefits is received by the insurance institution, except that no notice shall be required if personal information is collected only from the policyholder or from public records.
-
In the case of an application for insurance a notice shall be provided no later than:
-
The notice required by subsection A of this section shall be in writing or, if the applicant or policyholder agrees, in electronic format, and shall state:
- Whether personal information may be collected from persons other than an individual proposed for coverage;
- The types of personal information that may be collected and the types of sources and investigative techniques that may be used to collect such information;
- The types of disclosures made under subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of subsection B and subdivision 2 of subsection C of § 38.2-613 and the circumstances under which such disclosures may be made without prior authorization, however only those circumstances need be described that occur with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice;
- A description of the rights established under §§ 38.2-608 and 38.2-609 and the manner in which those rights may be exercised; and
- That information obtained from a report prepared by an insurance-support organization may be retained by the insurance-support organization and disclosed to other persons.
-
Instead of the notice prescribed in subsection B of this section, the insurance institution or agent may provide an abbreviated notice in writing or, if the applicant or policyholder agrees, in electronic format, informing the applicant or policyholder
that:
- Personal information may be collected from persons other than an individual proposed for coverage;
- The information, as well as other personal or privileged information subsequently collected by the insurance institution or agent, in certain circumstances, may be disclosed to third parties without authorization;
- A right of access and correction exists with respect to all personal information collected; and
- The notice prescribed in subsection B of this section will be furnished to the applicant or policyholder upon request.
- The obligations imposed by this section upon an insurance institution or agent may be satisfied by another insurance institution or agent authorized to act on its behalf.
- An insurance agent shall not be subject to the requirements of this section in any instance where the insurance institution on whose behalf the agent is acting otherwise complies with the requirements contained herein, and the agent does not disclose any personal information to any person other than the insurance institution or its affiliates, or as permitted by § 38.2-613 .
- [Repealed.]
- An insurance agent seeking to place coverage on behalf of a current policyholder shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section in any instance where the agent has provided the notice required by this section within the previous 12 months.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.7; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 371; 2002, c. 76; 2003, c. 266.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371, in subdivision B, inserted “or, if the applicant or policyholder agrees, in electronic format,” in the introductory language, and in subdivision 3, substituted “made under subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of subsection B and subdivision 2 of subsection C of” for “identified in subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, and 14 of,” and deleted the last sentence, which formerly read: “However, only those circumstances need be described that occur with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice”; inserted “in writing or, if the applicant or policyholder agrees, in electronic format” in subsection C; and added subsections E and F.
The 2002 amendments.
The 2002 amendment by c. 76 deleted subsection F, which provided for the satisfaction of the requirements of this section by providing notice as set forth in § 38.2-604.1 C.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 266 inserted subdivision A 1 c; substituted “24” for “twenty-four” in subdivision A 2 b; inserted “however only those circumstances need be described that occur with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice” in subdivision B 3; and added subsection G.
§ 38.2-604.1. Notice of financial information collection and disclosure practices.
-
An insurance institution or agent shall provide clear and conspicuous notice of financial information collection and disclosure practices in connection with insurance transactions as required by subsection B of this section:
- To an applicant before any financial information is disclosed about that applicant to any nonaffiliated third party, if the disclosure is made other than as permitted under § 38.2-613 . For purposes of this subdivision, a notice provided to an employer benefit plan sponsor, group or blanket insurance contract holder, or group annuity contract holder shall satisfy the notice requirements of this subdivision for applicants of such plan, policy, or annuity, provided the insurance institution or agent does not disclose the financial information of those applicants to a nonaffiliated third party, other than as permitted under § 38.2-613 ;
- To a policyholder no later than delivery or issuance of the policy or any other evidence of coverage, or at the later of these events. For purposes of this subdivision, a notice provided to an employee benefit plan sponsor, group or blanket insurance contract holder, or group annuity contract holder shall satisfy the notice requirements of this subdivision for persons covered under such plans, policies, or annuities, provided the insurance institution or agent does not disclose the financial information of those persons to a nonaffiliated third party, other than as permitted under § 38.2-613; and
- To a policyholder, other than a policyholder of a title insurance policy, not less than once in each calendar year. A notice provided to the sponsor of an employee benefit plan or the owner of a group or blanket insurance policy or group annuity contract shall satisfy the notice requirements of this subdivision for persons covered under such plan, policy or contract. For purposes of this subdivision only, “policyholder” does not include a person who owns a policy that is lapsed, expired or otherwise inactive or dormant under the insurance institution’s business practices, and with whom the insurance institution has not communicated about the relationship for a period of 12 consecutive months, other than annual privacy notices, material required by law or regulation, communication at the direction of a state or federal authority, or promotional materials. An insurance institution or agent that provides nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties only in accordance with § 38.2-613 and has not changed its policies and practices with regard to disclosing nonpublic financial information from the policies and practices that were disclosed in the most recent notice sent to the policyholder in accordance with this section shall not be required to provide an annual notice under this section until such time as the licensee does not comply with any criteria described in this subdivision.
-
Any notice required by subsection A of this section shall be in writing or, if the applicant or policyholder agrees, in electronic format, and shall state:
- The types of financial information that may be collected;
- The types of financial information that may be disclosed;
- The categories of persons to whom financial information may be disclosed; however, when disclosures are made pursuant to subsection B of § 38.2-613 , the notice is only required to state that disclosures may be made without prior authorization as permitted by law;
- If financial information is disclosed pursuant to subdivision C 1 of § 38.2-613 , the types of financial information that may be disclosed and the categories of nonaffiliated third parties to whom financial information may be disclosed by contractual agreement;
- An explanation of the right to direct that financial information not be disclosed to nonaffiliated third parties as provided in § 38.2-612.1 , provided that this explanation shall not be required to be given when information is disclosed pursuant to the provisions of § 38.2-613;
- A description of the policies and practices for protecting the confidentiality and security of financial information;
- The disclosure required, if any, under Section 603 (d)(2)(A)(iii) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) pertaining to the notices regarding the ability to opt out of disclosure of information among affiliates; and
- A description of the types of financial information about former policyholders that may be disclosed and a description of the types of affiliates and nonaffiliated third parties to whom financial information about former policyholders may be disclosed; however, when disclosures are made pursuant to subsection B of § 38.2-613, the notice is only required to state that disclosures may be made without prior authorization as permitted by law.
-
An insurance institution or agent that does not disclose, and does not wish to reserve the right to disclose, financial information about policyholders or former policyholders to affiliates or nonaffiliated third parties except as authorized in subsection
B of §
38.2-613
may satisfy the requirements of this section by providing a notice, as set forth in subdivisions A 2 and A 3 of this section, that:
- States the foregoing information regarding such insurance institution or agent;
- Includes the information described in subdivisions B 1 and B 6 of this section; and
- States that the insurance institution or agent makes disclosures to other affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties, as applicable, as permitted by law.
- An insurance institution or agent may satisfy the notice requirements of subdivision A 1 of this section by providing a short form notice at the same time that the insurance institution or agent delivers an opt out notice as required by § 38.2-612.1 . Such a short form notice shall: (i) be clear and conspicuous; (ii) state that the notice prescribed in subsection B of this section is available upon request; (iii) explain a reasonable means by which the applicant may obtain that notice; and (iv) be in writing or, if the applicant agrees, in electronic format. The insurance institution or agent is not required to deliver the notice prescribed in subsection B of this section with its short form notice, provided the insurance institution or agent provides the applicant with a reasonable means to obtain such notice.
- The obligations imposed by this section upon an insurance institution or agent may be satisfied by another insurance institution or agent authorized to act on its behalf. An insurance institution may provide a joint notice from the insurance institution and one or more of its affiliates or other financial institutions, as identified in the notice, if the notice is accurate with respect to the insurance institution and the other institutions.
- An insurance institution or agent, prior to disclosing financial information to a nonaffiliated third party other than as described in the notice prescribed in subsection B of this section, shall send a revised notice that accurately describes its information collection and disclosure practices. Such notice shall comply with the provisions of subsection B of this section.
- An insurance institution or agent may satisfy the notice requirements of § 38.2-604 and this section through the use of separate notices or a combined notice.
- An insurance agent shall not be subject to the requirements of this section in any instance where the insurance institution on whose behalf the agent is acting otherwise complies with the requirements contained herein, and the agent does not disclose any financial information to any person other than the insurance institution or its affiliates, or as permitted by § 38.2-613 .
- An insurance agent seeking to place coverage on behalf of a current policyholder shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section in any instance where the agent has provided the notice required by this section within the previous 12 months.
History. 2001, c. 371; 2002, c. 76; 2003, c. 266; 2017, c. 648.
The 2002 amendments.
The 2002 amendment by c. 76 substituted “each calendar year” for “any consecutive twelve-month period” at the end of the first sentence of subdivision A 3; and inserted “as set forth in subdivisions A 2 and A 3 of this section” in subsection C.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 266 substituted “12” for “twelve” in subdivision A 3; and added subsection I.
The 2017 amendments.
The 2017 amendment by c. 648 added the last sentence in subdivision A 3.
§ 38.2-605. Marketing and research surveys.
An insurance institution or agent shall clearly specify those questions designed to obtain information solely for marketing or research purposes from an individual in connection with an insurance transaction.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.8; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-606. Content of disclosure authorization forms.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law of this Commonwealth, no insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall utilize as its disclosure authorization form in connection with insurance transactions involving insurance policies or contracts issued after January 1, 1982, a form or statement that authorizes the disclosure of personal or privileged information about an individual to the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization unless the form or statement:
- Is written in plain language;
- Is dated;
- Specifies the types of persons authorized to disclose information about the individual;
- Specifies the nature of the information authorized to be disclosed;
- Names the insurance institution or agent and identifies by generic reference representatives of the insurance institution to whom the individual is authorizing information to be disclosed;
- Specifies the purposes for which the information is collected;
-
Specifies the length of time such authorization shall remain valid, which shall be no longer than:
-
In the case of authorizations signed for the purpose of collecting information in connection with an application for an insurance policy, a policy reinstatement, or a request for change in policy benefits:
- Thirty months from the date the authorization is signed if the application or request involves life, accident and sickness, or disability insurance; or
- Two years from the date the authorization is signed if the application or request involves property or casualty insurance;
-
In the case of authorizations signed for the purpose of collecting information in connection with a claim for benefits under an insurance policy:
- The term of coverage of the policy if the claim is for an accident and sickness insurance benefit; or
- The duration of the claim if the claim is not for an accident and sickness insurance benefit; and
-
In the case of authorizations signed for the purpose of collecting information in connection with an application for an insurance policy, a policy reinstatement, or a request for change in policy benefits:
- Advises the individual or a person authorized to act on behalf of the individual that the individual or the individual’s authorized representative is entitled to receive a copy of the authorization form.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.9; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 371.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371 substituted “Two years” for “One year” at the beginning of subdivision 7 a (2).
§ 38.2-607. Investigative consumer reports.
-
No insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may prepare or request an investigative consumer report about an individual in connection with an insurance transaction involving an application for insurance, a policy renewal, a policy
reinstatement or a change in insurance benefits unless the insurance institution or agent informs the individual:
- That he may request to be interviewed in connection with the preparation of the investigative consumer report; and
- That upon a request pursuant to § 38.2-608 , he is entitled to receive a copy of the investigative consumer report.
- If an investigative consumer report is to be prepared by an insurance institution or agent, the insurance institution or agent shall institute reasonable procedures to conduct a personal interview requested by an individual.
- If an investigative consumer report is to be prepared by an insurance-support organization, the insurance institution or agent desiring the report shall inform the insurance-support organization whether a personal interview has been requested by the individual. The insurance-support organization shall institute reasonable procedures to conduct such interviews, if requested.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.10; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-608. Access to recorded personal information.
-
If any individual, after proper identification, submits a written request to an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization for access to recorded personal information about the individual that is reasonably described by the individual
and reasonably able to be located and retrieved by the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall within 30 business days from the
date the request is received:
- Inform the individual of the nature and substance of the recorded personal information in writing, by telephone, or by other oral communication, whichever the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization prefers;
- Permit the individual to see and copy, in person, the recorded personal information pertaining to him or to obtain a copy of the recorded personal information by mail, whichever the individual prefers, unless the recorded personal information is in coded form, in which case an accurate translation in plain language shall be provided in writing;
- Disclose to the individual the identity, if recorded, of those persons to whom the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization has disclosed the personal information within two years prior to such request, and if the identity is not recorded, the names of those insurance institutions, agents, insurance-support organizations or other persons to whom such information is normally disclosed; and
- Provide the individual with a summary of the procedures by which he may request correction, amendment, or deletion of recorded personal information.
- Any personal information provided pursuant to subsection A of this section shall identify the source of the information if it is an institutional source.
- Medical-record information supplied by a medical-care institution or medical professional and requested under subsection A of this section, together with the identity of the medical professional or medical care institution that provided the information, shall be supplied either directly to the individual or to a medical professional designated by the individual and licensed to provide medical care with respect to the condition to which the information relates, whichever the individual prefers. If the individual elects to have the information disclosed to a medical professional designated by him, the insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization shall notify the individual, at the time of the disclosure, that it has provided the information to the medical professional.However, disclosure directly to the individual may be denied if a treating physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker has determined, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the disclosure requested would be reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the individual or another person or that the information requested makes reference to a person other than a health care provider and disclosure of such information would be reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the referenced person.If disclosure to the individual is denied, upon the individual’s request, the insurance institution, agent or insurance support organization shall either (i) designate a physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker acceptable to the insurance institution, agent or insurance support organization, who was not directly involved in the denial, and whose licensure, training, and experience relative to the individual’s condition are at least equivalent to that of the physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker who made the original determination, who shall, at the expense of the insurance institution, agent or insurance support organization, make a judgment as to whether to make the information available to the individual; or (ii) if the individual so requests, make the information available, at the individual’s expense to a physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker selected by the individual, whose licensure, training and experience relative to the individual’s condition are at least equivalent to that of the physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker who made the original determination, who shall make a judgment as to whether to make the information available to the individual. The insurance institution, agent, or insurance support organization shall comply with the judgment of the reviewing physician, clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker made in accordance with the foregoing procedures.
- Except for personal information provided under § 38.2-610 , an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in providing a copy of recorded personal information to individuals.
- The obligations imposed by this section upon an insurance institution or agent may be satisfied by another insurance institution or agent authorized to act on its behalf. With respect to the copying and disclosure of recorded personal information pursuant to a request under subsection A of this section, an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may make arrangements with an insurance-support organization or a consumer reporting agency to copy and disclose recorded personal information on its behalf.
- The rights granted to individuals in this section shall extend to all natural persons to the extent information about them is collected and maintained by an insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization in connection with an insurance transaction. The rights granted to all natural persons by this subsection shall not extend to information about them that relates to and is collected in connection with or in reasonable anticipation of a claim or civil or criminal proceeding involving them.
- For purposes of this section, the term “insurance-support organization” does not include “consumer reporting agency.”
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.11; 1986, c. 562; 2004, cc. 65, 1014; 2020, c. 945.
The 2004 amendments.
The 2004 amendments by cc. 65 and 1014 are identical, and in subsection C, in the first paragraph, at the end of the first sentence, substituted “individual” for “insurance institution, agent or insurance support organization” and in the last sentence, substituted “If the individual elects to have the information disclosed to a medical professional designated by him” for “If it elects to disclose the information to a medical professional designated by the individual”; and added the next-to-last and last paragraphs; and made a minor stylistic change.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 945, in subsection C in the second paragraph, substituted “clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker” for “or treating clinical psychologist” and in the third paragraph, substituted “clinical psychologist, or clinical social worker” for “or clinical psychologist” throughout the section.
§ 38.2-609. Correction, amendment, or deletion of recorded personal information.
-
Within thirty business days from the date of receipt of a written request from an individual to correct, amend, or delete any recorded personal information about the individual within its possession, an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support
organization shall either:
- Correct, amend, or delete the portion of the recorded personal information in dispute; or
-
Notify the individual of:
- Its refusal to make the correction, amendment, or deletion;
- The reasons for the refusal; and
- The individual’s right to file a statement as provided in subsection C of this section.
-
If the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization corrects, amends, or deletes recorded personal information in accordance with subdivision 1 of subsection A of this section, the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support
organization shall so notify the individual in writing and furnish the correction, amendment, or fact of deletion to:
- Any person specifically designated by the individual who, within the preceding two years, may have received the recorded personal information;
- Any insurance-support organization whose primary source of personal information is insurance institutions if the insurance-support organization has systematically received the recorded personal information from the insurance institution within the preceding seven years. The correction, amendment, or fact of deletion need not be furnished if the insurance-support organization no longer maintains recorded personal information about the individual; and
- Any insurance-support organization that furnished the personal information that has been corrected, amended, or deleted.
-
Whenever an individual disagrees with an insurance institution’s, agent’s, or insurance-support organization’s refusal to correct, amend, or delete recorded personal information, the individual shall be permitted to file with the insurance institution,
agent, or insurance-support organization:
- A concise statement setting forth what the individual thinks is the correct, relevant, or fair information; and
- A concise statement of the reasons why the individual disagrees with the insurance institution’s, agent’s, or insurance-support organization’s refusal to correct, amend, or delete recorded personal information.
-
In the event an individual files either statement as described in subsection C of this section, the insurance institution, agent, or support organization shall:
- File the statement with the disputed personal information and provide a means by which anyone reviewing the disputed personal information will be made aware of the individual’s statement and have access to it; and
- In any subsequent disclosure by the insurance institution, agent, or support organization of the recorded personal information that is the subject of disagreement, clearly identify the matter or matters in dispute and provide the individual’s statement along with the recorded personal information being disclosed; and
- Furnish the statement to the persons and in the manner specified in subsection B of this section.
- The rights granted to individuals in this section shall extend to all natural persons to the extent information about them is collected and maintained by an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization in connection with an insurance transaction. The rights granted to all natural persons by this subsection shall not extend to information about them that relates to and is collected in connection with or in reasonable anticipation of a claim or civil or criminal proceeding involving them.
- For purposes of this section, the term “insurance-support organization” does not include “consumer reporting agency.”
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.12; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-610. Notice of adverse underwriting decision; furnishing reasons for decisions and sources of information.
-
In the event of an adverse underwriting decision, including those that involve policies referred to in subdivision 1 of subsection E of §
38.2-2114
and in subdivision 3 of subsection F of §
38.2-2212
, the insurance institution or agent responsible for the decision shall give a written notice in a form approved by the Commission that:
- Either provides the applicant, policyholder, or individual proposed for coverage with the specific reason or reasons for the adverse underwriting decision in writing or advises such person that upon written request he may receive the specific reason or reasons in writing; and
- Provides the applicant, policyholder, or individual proposed for coverage with a summary of the rights established under subsection B of this section and §§ 38.2-608 and 38.2-609 .
-
Upon receipt of a written request within ninety business days from the date of the mailing of notice or other communication of an adverse underwriting decision to an applicant, policyholder or individual proposed for coverage, the insurance institution
or agent shall furnish to such person within twenty-one business days from the date of receipt of the written request:
- The specific reason or reasons for the adverse underwriting decision, in writing, if that information was not initially furnished in writing pursuant to subdivision 1 of subsection A of this section;
-
The specific items of personal and privileged information that support those reasons, however:
- The insurance institution or agent shall not be required to furnish specific items of privileged information if it has a reasonable suspicion, based upon specific information available for review by the Commission, that the applicant, policyholder, or individual proposed for coverage has engaged in criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or material nondisclosure; and
- Specific items of medical-record information supplied by a medical-care institution or medical professional shall be disclosed either directly to the individual about whom the information relates or to a medical professional designated by the individual and licensed to provide medical care with respect to the condition to which the information relates, whichever the insurance institution or agent prefers; and
- The names and addresses of the institutional sources that supplied the specific items of information given pursuant to subdivision 2 of subsection B of this section. However, the identity of any medical professional or medical-care institution shall be disclosed either directly to the individual or to the designated medical professional, whichever the insurance institution or agent prefers.
- The obligations imposed by this section upon an insurance institution or agent may be satisfied by another insurance institution or agent authorized to act on its behalf. However, the insurance institution or agent making an adverse underwriting decision shall remain responsible for compliance with the obligations imposed by this section.
- When an adverse underwriting decision results solely from an oral request or inquiry, the explanation of reasons and summary of rights required by subsection A of this section may be given orally.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.13; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-611. Information concerning previous adverse underwriting decisions.
No insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may seek information in connection with an insurance transaction concerning: (i) any previous adverse underwriting decision experienced by an individual, or (ii) any previous insurance coverage obtained by an individual through a residual market mechanism, unless the inquiry also requests the reasons for any previous adverse underwriting decision or the reasons why insurance coverage was previously obtained through a residual market mechanism.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.14; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-612. Bases for adverse underwriting decisions.
-
No insurance institution or agent may base an adverse underwriting decision in whole or in part:
- On the fact of a previous adverse underwriting decision or on the fact that an individual previously obtained insurance coverage through a residual market mechanism. However, an insurance institution or agent may base an adverse underwriting decision on further information obtained from an insurance institution or agent responsible for a previous adverse underwriting decision;
- On personal information received from an insurance-support organization whose primary source of information is insurance institutions. However, an insurance institution or agent may base an adverse underwriting decision on further personal information obtained as the result of information received from an insurance-support organization; or
- On the fact that an individual previously obtained insurance coverage from a particular insurance institution or agent.
- No insurance institution or agent may base an adverse underwriting decision solely on the loss history of a previous owner of the property to be insured.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.15; 1986, c. 562; 1990, c. 524; 2003, c. 415.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 415 inserted the subsection A designation; and added subsection B.
§ 38.2-612.1. Special requirements for providing financial information to nonaffiliated third parties.
-
Except as otherwise provided in §
38.2-613
, no insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may, directly or through an affiliate, disclose to a nonaffiliated third party financial information about an individual collected or received
in connection with an insurance transaction, unless:
- The individual has been given a clear and conspicuous notice in writing, or in electronic form if the individual agrees, stating that such financial information may be disclosed to such nonaffiliated third party;
- The individual is given an opportunity, before such financial information is initially disclosed, to direct that such information not be disclosed, and in no case shall the individual be given less than 30 days from the date of notice to direct that such information not be disclosed;
- The individual is given a reasonable means by which to exercise the right to direct that such information not be disclosed as well as an explanation that such right may be exercised at any time and that such right remains effective until revoked by the individual; and
- The nonaffiliated third party agrees not to disclose such financial information to any other person unless such disclosure would otherwise be permitted by this article if made by the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization.
-
-
No insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may disclose to a nonaffiliated third party, directly or through an affiliate, other than to a consumer reporting agency, a policy number or similar form of access number or transaction
account of a policyholder or applicant for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to an applicant or policyholder, other than to: B. 1. No insurance institution, agent, or
insurance-support organization may disclose to a nonaffiliated third party, directly or through an affiliate, other than to a consumer reporting agency, a policy number or similar form of access number or transaction account
of a policyholder or applicant for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to an applicant or policyholder, other than to:
- An agent or other person solely for the purpose of marketing the insurance institution’s own products or services as long as the agent or other person is not authorized to directly initiate charges to the account; or
- A participant in a private label credit card program or an affinity or similar program where the participants in the program are identified to the policyholder or applicant at the time the policyholder or applicant enters the program.
- A policy or transaction account shall not include an account to which third parties cannot initiate charges.
-
No insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may disclose to a nonaffiliated third party, directly or through an affiliate, other than to a consumer reporting agency, a policy number or similar form of access number or transaction
account of a policyholder or applicant for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to an applicant or policyholder, other than to: B. 1. No insurance institution, agent, or
insurance-support organization may disclose to a nonaffiliated third party, directly or through an affiliate, other than to a consumer reporting agency, a policy number or similar form of access number or transaction account
of a policyholder or applicant for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to an applicant or policyholder, other than to:
- No insurance institution or agent shall unfairly discriminate against an individual because (i) the individual has directed that his personal information not be disclosed pursuant to subsection A or (ii) the individual has refused to grant authorization of the disclosure of his privileged information or medical record information by an insurance institution, agent or insurance support organization pursuant to subsection A of § 38.2-613 .
- The requirements of subsection A may be satisfied by providing a single notice if two or more applicants or policyholders jointly obtain or apply for an insurance product. Such notice shall allow one applicant or policyholder to direct that financial information not be disclosed to nonaffiliated third parties on behalf of all of the joint applicants or policyholders, provided that each applicant or policyholder may separately direct that his financial information not be disclosed to nonaffiliated third parties.
- An insurance agent shall not be subject to the requirements of subsection A in any instance where the insurance institution on whose behalf the agent is acting otherwise complies with the requirements contained herein, and the agent does not disclose any financial information to any person other than the insurance institution or its affiliates, or as permitted by § 38.2-613 .
- An insurance agent seeking to place coverage on behalf of a current policyholder shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section in any instance where the agent has provided the notice required by this section within the previous 12 months.
History. 2001, c. 371; 2003, c. 266; 2020, c. 264.
The 2003 amendments.
The 2003 amendment by c. 266 substituted “30” for “thirty” in subdivision A 2; and added subsection F.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264, in subdivision A 4, substituted “article” for “chapter”; and in subsections D and E, deleted “of this section” following “subsection A.”
§ 38.2-612.2. Protection of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Nothing in this article shall be construed to modify, limit, or supersede the operation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.), and no inference shall be drawn on the basis of the provisions of this article regarding whether information is transaction or experience information under Section 603 of that Act.
History. 2001, c. 371; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” twice.
§ 38.2-613. Disclosure limitations and conditions.
-
An insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall not disclose any medical-record information or privileged information about an individual collected or received in connection with an insurance transaction unless the disclosure
is with the written authorization of the individual, provided:
- If the authorization is submitted by another insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, the authorization meets the requirements of § 38.2-606 ; or
-
If the authorization is submitted by a person other than an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, the authorization is:
- Dated,
- Signed by the individual, and
- Obtained two years or less prior to the date a disclosure is sought pursuant to this subdivision.
-
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A, an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may disclose personal or privileged information about an individual collected or received in connection with an insurance transaction, without
written authorization, if the disclosure is:
-
To a person other than an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, provided the disclosure is reasonably necessary:
-
To enable that person to perform a business, professional or insurance function for the disclosing insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization and that person agrees not to disclose the information further without the individual’s
written authorization unless the further disclosure:
- Would otherwise be permitted by this section if made by an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization; or
- Is reasonably necessary for that person to perform its function for the disclosing insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization; or
-
To enable that person to provide information to the disclosing insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization for the purpose of:
- Determining an individual’s eligibility for an insurance benefit or payment; or
- Detecting or preventing criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or material nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; or
-
To enable that person to perform a business, professional or insurance function for the disclosing insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization and that person agrees not to disclose the information further without the individual’s
written authorization unless the further disclosure:
-
To an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, or self-insurer, provided the information disclosed is limited to that which is reasonably necessary:
- To detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or material nondisclosure in connection with insurance transactions; or
- For either the disclosing or receiving insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization to perform its function in connection with an insurance transaction involving the individual; or
- To a medical-care institution or medical professional for the purpose of (i) verifying insurance coverage or benefits, (ii) informing an individual of a medical problem of which the individual may not be aware or (iii) conducting an operations or services audit, provided only that information is disclosed as is reasonably necessary to accomplish the foregoing purposes; or
- To an insurance regulatory authority; or
-
To a law-enforcement or other government authority:
- To protect the interests of the insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization in preventing or prosecuting the perpetration of fraud upon it; or
- If the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization reasonably believes that illegal activities have been conducted by the individual; or
- Upon written request of any law-enforcement agency, for all insured or claimant information in the possession of an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization which relates an ongoing criminal investigation. Such insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall release such information, including, but not limited to, policy information, premium payment records, record of prior claims by the insured or by another claimant, and information collected in connection with an insurance company’s investigation of an application or claim. Any information released to a law-enforcement agency pursuant to such request shall be treated as confidential criminal investigation information and not be disclosed further except as provided by law. Notwithstanding any provision in this article, no insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization shall notify any insured or claimant that information has been requested or supplied pursuant to this section prior to notification from the requesting law-enforcement agency that its criminal investigation is completed. Within ninety days following the completion of any such criminal investigation, the law-enforcement agency making such a request for information shall notify any insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization from whom information was requested that the criminal investigation has been completed; or
- Otherwise permitted or required by law; or
- In response to a facially valid administrative or judicial order, including a search warrant or subpoena; or
-
Made for the purpose of conducting actuarial or research studies, provided:
- No individual may be identified in any actuarial or research report, and
- Materials allowing the individual to be identified are returned or destroyed as soon as they are no longer needed, and
- The actuarial or research organization agrees not to disclose the information unless the disclosure would otherwise be permitted by this section if made by an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization; or
-
To a party or a representative of a party to a proposed or consummated sale, transfer, merger, or consolidation of all or part of the business of the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, provided:
- Prior to the consummation of the sale, transfer, merger, or consolidation only such information is disclosed as is reasonably necessary to enable the recipient to make business decisions about the purchase, transfer, merger, or consolidation, and
- The recipient agrees not to disclose the information unless the disclosure would otherwise be permitted by this section if made by an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization; or
-
To a nonaffiliated third party whose only use of such information will be in connection with the marketing of a nonfinancial product or service, provided:
- No medical-record information, privileged information, or personal information relating to an individual’s character, personal habits, mode of living, or general reputation is disclosed, and no classification derived from the information is disclosed,
- The individual has been given an opportunity, in accordance with the provisions of subsection A of § 38.2-612.1 , to indicate that he does not want financial information disclosed for marketing purposes and has given no indication that he does not want the information disclosed, and
- The nonaffiliated third party receiving such information agrees not to use it except in connection with the marketing of the product or service; or
-
- To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) or (ii) from a consumer report reported by a consumer reporting agency; or 11. (i) To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) or (ii) from a consumer report reported by a consumer reporting agency; or
- To a group policyholder for the purpose of reporting claims experience or conducting an audit of the insurance institution’s or agent’s operations or services, provided the information disclosed is reasonably necessary for the group policyholder to conduct the review or audit; or
- To a professional peer review organization for the purpose of reviewing the service or conduct of a medical-care institution or medical professional; or
- To a governmental authority for the purpose of determining the individual’s eligibility for health benefits for which the governmental authority may be liable; or
- To a certificate holder or policyholder for the purpose of providing information regarding the status of an insurance transaction; or
-
To a lienholder, mortgagee, assignee, lessor or other person shown on the records of an insurance institution or agent as having a legal or beneficial interest in a policy of insurance, or to persons acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity on
behalf of the individual, provided that:
- No medical record information is disclosed unless the disclosure would be permitted by this section; and
- The information disclosed is limited to that which is reasonably necessary to permit such person to protect his interest in the policy; or
- Necessary to effect, administer, or enforce a transaction requested or authorized by the individual, or in connection with servicing or processing an insurance product or service requested or authorized by the individual, or necessary for reinsurance purposes, or for stop loss or excess loss agreements provided for in subsection B of § 38.2-109 ; or
- Pursuant to any federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act privacy rules promulgated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
-
To a person other than an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization, provided the disclosure is reasonably necessary:
-
An insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization may disclose information about an individual collected or received in connection with an insurance transaction, without written authorization, if the disclosure is:
-
To a nonaffiliated third party whose only use of such information will be to perform services for or functions on behalf of the insurance institution in connection with the marketing of the insurance institution’s product or service or the marketing of
products or services offered pursuant to a joint marketing agreement, provided:
- No medical-record information or privileged information is disclosed without the individual’s written authorization unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by subsection B,
- With respect to financial information, the individual has been given the notice required by subsection B of § 38.2-604.1 , and
- The person receiving such financial information agrees, by contract, (i) not to use it except to perform services for or functions on behalf of the insurance institution in connection with the marketing of the insurance institution’s product or service or the marketing of products or services offered pursuant to a joint marketing agreement, or as permitted under subsection B and (ii) to maintain the confidentiality of such information and not disclose it to any other nonaffiliated third party unless such disclosure would otherwise be permitted by this section if made by the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization;
-
To an affiliate, provided:
- No medical-record information or privileged information is disclosed without the individual’s written authorization unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by subsection B, and
- The affiliate receiving the information does not disclose the information except as would otherwise be permitted by this section if such disclosure were made by the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization.
-
To a nonaffiliated third party whose only use of such information will be to perform services for or functions on behalf of the insurance institution in connection with the marketing of the insurance institution’s product or service or the marketing of
products or services offered pursuant to a joint marketing agreement, provided:
-
- No person proposing to issue, re-issue, or renew any policy, contract, or plan of accident and sickness insurance defined in § 38.2-109 , but excluding disability income insurance, issued by any (i) insurer providing hospital, medical and surgical or major medical coverage on an expense incurred basis, (ii) corporation providing a health services plan, or (iii) health maintenance organization providing a health care plan for health care services shall disclose any genetic information about an individual or a member of such individual’s family collected or received in connection with any insurance transaction unless the disclosure is made with the written authorization of the individual. D. 1. No person proposing to issue, re-issue, or renew any policy, contract, or plan of accident and sickness insurance defined in § 38.2-109 , but excluding disability income insurance, issued by any (i) insurer providing hospital, medical and surgical or major medical coverage on an expense incurred basis, (ii) corporation providing a health services plan, or (iii) health maintenance organization providing a health care plan for health care services shall disclose any genetic information about an individual or a member of such individual’s family collected or received in connection with any insurance transaction unless the disclosure is made with the written authorization of the individual.
- For the purpose of this subsection, “genetic information” means information about genes, gene products, or inherited characteristics that may derive from an individual or a family member.
- Agents and insurance support organizations shall be subject to the provisions of this subsection to the extent of their participation in the issue, re-issue, or renewal of any policy, contract, or plan of accident and sickness insurance defined in § 38.2-109, but excluding disability income insurance.
- Any notices, disclosures, or authorizations required by this section may be provided electronically if the individual agrees.
- Any privileged information about an individual that is disclosed in violation of this section shall be available to that individual in accordance with the provisions of §§ 38.2-608 and 38.2-609 .
- Except in the case of disclosures made pursuant to subdivision B 10, the requirements of subsection A of § 38.2-612.1 shall not apply when information is disclosed pursuant to this section.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.16; 1986, c. 562; 1987, c. 325; 1996, c. 704; 2001, c. 371; 2020, c. 264.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 371, in subsection A, substituted “medical-record information” for “personal,” deleted the subdivision designator 1 following “disclosure is” and combined the language of said subdivision with the introductory language of A, substituted the subdivision designators 1 and 2 for a and b, substituted the subdivision designators a, b, and c for (1), (2), and (3), and in c, substituted “two years” for “one year,” and deleted “or” at the end; in subsection B, added the introductory language, substituted subdivision designators 1 through 10 for 2 through 11, inserted “or” at the end of subdivision 5 c, substituted “nonaffiliated third party” for “person,” in subdivision 10 and in 10 c, and inserted “nonfinancial” in subdivision 10, and in subdivision 10 b, inserted “in accordance with the provisions of subsection A of § 38.2-612.1 ,” and substituted “financial” for “personal”; deleted subdivision 12, which formerly read: “To an affiliate whose only use of the information will be in connection with an audit of the insurance institution or agent or the marketing of an insurance product or service, provided the affiliate agrees not to disclose the information for any other purpose or to unaffiliated persons; or”; redesignated former subdivisions 13 through 18 as present subdivisions 11 through 16; rewrote present subdivision 11, which formerly read: “By a consumer reporting agency, provided the disclosure is to a person other than an insurance institution or agent; or”; inserted “or to persons acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity on behalf of the individual” in subdivision 16; inserted “or” at the end of subdivision 16 b; and added subdivisions 17 and 18; added subsection C; redesignated former subsection B as subsection D; and added subsections E through G.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264, in subsection B, deleted “of this section” following “subsection A” in the introductory language; in subdivision B 5 c, substituted “article” for “chapter”; in subdivisions C 1 a, C 1 b and C 2 a, deleted “of this section” following “subsection B”; and in subsection G, deleted “of this section” following “subdivision B 10.”
§ 38.2-613.01. Commission to promulgate regulations on disclosure of certain medical test results to insurance applicants.
Pursuant to the authority granted by §§ 38.2-223 and 38.2-3100.1 , the Commission shall promulgate such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to ensure that applicants for life or accident and sickness insurance coverage or for modifications to existing coverage are notified of test results whenever insurers require such applicants to submit to testing for human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV).
History. 1997, c. 290.
§ 38.2-613.1. Disclosure of agent’s moratorium required.
If a duly appointed agent of an insurer proposes to place a policy of motor vehicle insurance as defined in § 38.2-2212 with another insurer or proposes to submit an application to the Virginia Automobile Insurance Plan solely because of a moratorium on such agent’s selling, soliciting, or negotiating new motor vehicle insurance that would otherwise be acceptable to such insurer and such placement or submission would result in the applicant’s being charged a higher rate, the agent shall disclose to the applicant the existence of the moratorium prior to such placement or submission.
History. 1991, c. 269; 2001, c. 706.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 706, effective September 1, 2002, substituted “selling, soliciting, or negotiating” for “soliciting, negotiating, procuring, or effecting” near the middle of the section.
§ 38.2-613.2. Repealed by Acts 2020, c. 264, cl. 2.
Cross references.
For current provisions related to insurance data security, see Article 2 (§ 38.2-621 et seq.) of this chapter.
Editor’s note.
Former § 38.2-613.2 , pertaining to the information security program, derived from Acts 2003, c. 729.
§ 38.2-614. Powers of Commission.
- The Commission shall have the power to examine and investigate the affairs of any insurance institution or agent doing business in the Commonwealth to determine whether the insurance institution or agent has been or is engaged in any conduct in violation of this article.
- The Commission shall have the power to examine and investigate the affairs of any insurance-support organization that acts on behalf of an insurance institution or agent and that either (i) transacts business in the Commonwealth, or (ii) transacts business outside the Commonwealth and has an effect on a person residing in the Commonwealth, in order to determine whether the insurance-support organization has been or is engaged in any conduct in violation of this article.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.17; 1986, c. 562; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth” and “article” for “chapter” throughout the section.
§ 38.2-615. Hearings and procedures.
- Whenever the Commission has reason to believe that an insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization has been or is engaged in conduct in the Commonwealth that violates this article, or whenever the Commission has reason to believe that an insurance-support organization has been or is engaged in conduct outside the Commonwealth that has an effect on a person residing in the Commonwealth and that violates this article, the Commission may issue and serve upon the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization a statement of charges and notice of hearing to be held at a time and place fixed in the notice. The date for such hearing shall be at least ten days after the date of service.
- At the time and place fixed for the hearing, the insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization charged shall have an opportunity to answer the charges against it and present evidence on its behalf. Upon good cause shown, the Commission shall permit any adversely affected person to intervene, appear, and be heard at the hearing by counsel or in person.
- In all matters in connection with such investigation, charge, or hearing the Commission shall have the jurisdiction, power and authority granted or conferred upon it by Title 12.1.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.18; 1986, c. 562; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264, in subsection A, substituted “article” for “chapter” and “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth” throughout the section.
§ 38.2-616. Service of process on insurance-support organizations.
For the purpose of this article, an insurance-support organization transacting business outside the Commonwealth that has an effect on a person residing in the Commonwealth and which is alleged to violate this article shall be deemed to have appointed the clerk of the Commission to accept service of process on its behalf. Service on the clerk shall be made in accordance with § 12.1-19.1 .
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.19; 1986, c. 562; 1991, c. 672; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” and “the Commonwealth” for “this Commonwealth” throughout the section.
§ 38.2-617. Individual remedies.
- If any insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization fails to comply with §§ 38.2-608 , 38.2-609 , or § 38.2-610 , any person whose rights granted under those sections are violated may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for appropriate equitable relief.
- An insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization that discloses information in violation of § 38.2-613 shall be liable for damages sustained by the individual to whom the information relates. No individual, however, shall be entitled to a monetary award that exceeds the actual damages sustained by the individual as a result of a violation of § 38.2-613 .
- In any action brought pursuant to this section, the court may award the cost of the action and reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
- An action under this section must be brought within two years from the date the alleged violation is or should have been discovered.
- Except as specifically provided in this section, there shall be no remedy or recovery available to individuals, in law or in equity, for occurrences constituting a violation of any provision of this article.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.24; 1986, c. 562; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” in subsection E.
§ 38.2-618. Immunity of persons disclosing information.
No cause of action in the nature of defamation, invasion of privacy, or negligence shall arise against any person for disclosing personal or privileged information in accordance with this article, nor shall such a cause of action arise against any person for furnishing personal or privileged information to an insurance institution, agent, or insurance-support organization. However, this section shall provide no immunity for disclosing or furnishing false information with malice or willful intent to injure any person.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.25; 1986, c. 562; 2020, c. 264.
The 2020 amendments.
The 2020 amendment by c. 264 substituted “article” for “chapter” in the first sentence.
§ 38.2-619. Obtaining information under false pretenses.
Any person who knowingly and willfully obtains information about an individual from an insurance institution, agent or insurance-support organization under false pretenses shall be fined not more than $10,000 or punished by confinement in jail for not more than 12 months, or both.
History. 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.26; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-620. Repealed by Acts 2020, c. 264, cl. 2.
Editor’s note.
Former § 38.2-620 , pertaining to the effective date of certain provisions, derived from Acts 1981, c. 389, § 38.1-57.28; 1986, c. 562.
Article 2. Insurance Data Security Act.
§ 38.2-621. Definitions.
As used in this article:
“Authorized person” means a person known to and authorized by the licensee and determined to be necessary and appropriate to have access to the nonpublic information held by the licensee and its information systems.
“Consumer” means an individual, including applicants, policyholders, insureds, beneficiaries, claimants, and certificate holders, who is a resident of the Commonwealth and whose nonpublic information is in the possession, custody, or control of a licensee or an authorized person.
“Cybersecurity event” means an event resulting in unauthorized access to, disruption of, or misuse of an information system or nonpublic information in the possession, custody, or control of a licensee or an authorized person. “Cybersecurity event” does not include (i) the unauthorized acquisition of encrypted nonpublic information if the encryption, process, or key is not also acquired, released, or used without authorization or (ii) an event in which the licensee has determined that the nonpublic information accessed by an unauthorized person has not been used or released and has been returned or destroyed.
“Encrypted” means the transformation of data into a form that results in a low probability of assigning meaning without the use of a protective process or key.
“HIPAA” means the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq.).
“Home state” means the jurisdiction in which the producer maintains its principal place of residence or principal place of business and is licensed by that jurisdiction to act as a resident insurance producer.
“Information security program” means the administrative, technical, and physical safeguards that a licensee uses to access, collect, distribute, process, protect, store, use, transmit, dispose of, or otherwise handle nonpublic information.
“Information system” means a discrete set of electronic information resources organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of electronic information, as well as any specialized system such as industrial or process control systems, telephone switching and private branch exchange systems, and environmental control systems.
“Insurance-support organization” has the same meaning as provided in § 38.2-602 .
“Licensee” means any person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be licensed, authorized, or registered pursuant to the insurance laws of the Commonwealth. “Licensee” does not include a purchasing group or a risk retention group chartered and licensed in a state other than the Commonwealth or a person that is acting as an assuming insurer that is domiciled in another state or jurisdiction.
“Nonpublic information” means information that is not publicly available information and is:
- Business-related information of a licensee the tampering with which, or the unauthorized disclosure, access, or use of which, would cause a material adverse impact to the business, operations, or security of the licensee;
- Any information concerning a consumer that because of name, number, personal mark, or other identifier can be used to identify such consumer, in any combination with a consumer’s (i) social security number; (ii) driver’s license number or nondriver identification card number; (iii) financial account, credit card, or debit card number; (iv) security code, access code, or password that would permit access to a consumer’s financial account; (v) passport number; (vi) military identification number; or (vii) biometric records; or
-
Any information or data, except age or gender, in any form or medium created by or derived from a health care provider or a consumer that can be used to identify a particular consumer, and that relates to (i) the past, present, or future physical, mental,
or behavioral health or condition of any consumer or a member of the consumer’s family; (i) the provision of health care to any consumer; or (iii) payment for the provision of health care to any consumer.
“Nonpublic information” does not include a consumer’s personally identifiable information that has been anonymized using a method no less secure than the safe harbor method under HIPAA.
“Person” means any individual or any nongovernmental entity, including any nongovernmental partnership, corporation, branch, agency, or association.
“Publicly available information” means any information that a licensee has a reasonable basis to believe is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records; widely distributed media; or disclosures to the general public that are required to be made by federal, state, or local law. A licensee has a reasonable basis to believe that information is lawfully made available to the general public if the licensee has taken steps to determine (i) that the information is of the type that is available to the general public and (ii) whether a consumer can direct that the information not be made available to the general public and, if so, that such consumer has not done so.
“Third-party service provider” means (i) a person, not otherwise defined as a licensee, that contracts with a licensee to maintain, process, or store nonpublic information, or otherwise is permitted access to nonpublic information through its provision of services to the licensee or (ii) an insurance-support organization.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-622. Private cause of action; neither created nor curtailed.
Nothing in this article shall be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for violation of its provisions, nor shall it be construed to curtail a private cause of action which would otherwise exist in the absence of this article.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-623. Information security program.
- Commensurate with the size and complexity of the licensee; the nature and scope of the licensee’s activities, including its use of third-party service providers; and the sensitivity of the nonpublic information used by the licensee or in the licensee’s possession, custody, or control, each licensee shall develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program based on the licensee’s assessment of the licensee’s risk and that contains administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the protection of nonpublic information and the licensee’s information system.
-
Each licensee’s information security program shall be designed to:
- Protect the security and confidentiality of nonpublic information and the security of the information system;
- Protect against any reasonably foreseeable threats or hazards to the security or integrity of nonpublic information and the information system;
- Protect against unauthorized access to or use of nonpublic information, and minimize the likelihood of harm to any consumer; and
- Define and periodically reevaluate a schedule for retention of nonpublic information and a mechanism for its destruction.
-
Each licensee shall:
- Designate one or more employees, an affiliate, or an outside vendor designated to act on behalf of the licensee who is responsible for the information security program;
- Design its information security program to mitigate the identified risks, commensurate with the size and complexity of the licensee; the nature and scope of the licensee’s activities, including its use of third-party service providers; and the sensitivity of the nonpublic information used by the licensee or in the licensee’s possession, custody, or control;
- Place access controls on information systems, including controls to authenticate and permit access only to authorized persons to protect against the unauthorized acquisition of nonpublic information;
- At physical locations containing nonpublic information, restrict access to nonpublic information to authorized persons only;
- Implement measures to protect against destruction, loss, or damage of nonpublic information due to environmental hazards, such as fire and water damage or other catastrophes or technological failures;
- Develop, implement, and maintain procedures for the secure disposal of nonpublic information in any format;
- Stay informed regarding emerging threats or vulnerabilities and utilize reasonable security measures when sharing information relative to the character of the sharing and the type of information shared; and
- Provide its personnel with cybersecurity awareness training.
-
- If a licensee has a board of directors, the board or an appropriate committee of the board shall, at a minimum, require the licensee’s information executive management or its delegates to (i) develop, implement, and maintain the licensee’s information security program and (ii) report in writing (a) the overall status of the information security program and the licensee’s compliance with this article and (b) material matters related to the information security program, addressing issues such as risk assessment, risk management and control decisions, third-party service provider arrangements, results of testing, cybersecurity events or violations and management’s responses thereto, and recommendations for changes in the information security program. D. 1. If a licensee has a board of directors, the board or an appropriate committee of the board shall, at a minimum, require the licensee’s information executive management or its delegates to (i) develop, implement, and maintain the licensee’s information security program and (ii) report in writing (a) the overall status of the information security program and the licensee’s compliance with this article and (b) material matters related to the information security program, addressing issues such as risk assessment, risk management and control decisions, third-party service provider arrangements, results of testing, cybersecurity events or violations and management’s responses thereto, and recommendations for changes in the information security program.
- If executive management delegates any of its responsibilities under this section, it shall oversee the development, implementation, and maintenance of the licensee’s information security program prepared by the delegate and shall receive a report from the delegate complying with the requirements of subdivision 1.
-
Beginning July 1, 2022, if a licensee utilizes a third-party service provider, the licensee shall:
- Exercise due diligence in selecting its third-party service provider; and
- Require a third-party service provider to implement appropriate administrative, technical, and physical measures to protect and secure the information systems and nonpublic information that are accessible to, or held by, the third-party service provider.
- Each licensee shall monitor, evaluate, and adjust, as appropriate, the information security program consistent with any relevant changes in technology, the sensitivity of its nonpublic information, internal or external threats to information, and the licensee’s own changing business arrangements, such as mergers and acquisitions, alliances and joint ventures, outsourcing arrangements, and changes to information systems.
-
As part of its information security program, each licensee shall establish a written incident response plan designed to promptly respond to, and recover from, any cybersecurity event that compromises the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of
nonpublic information in its possession; the licensee’s information systems; or the continuing functionality of any aspect of the licensee’s business or operations. Such incident response plan shall address:
- The internal process for responding to a cybersecurity event;
- The goals of the incident response plan;
- The definition of clear roles, responsibilities, and levels of decision-making authority;
- External and internal communications and information sharing;
- Identification of requirements for the remediation of any identified weaknesses in information systems and associated controls;
- Documentation and reporting regarding cybersecurity events and related incident response activities; and
- The evaluation and revision, as necessary, of the incident response plan following a cybersecurity event.
- Beginning in 2023 and annually thereafter, each insurer domiciled in the Commonwealth shall, by February 15, submit to the Commissioner a written statement certifying that the insurer is in compliance with the requirements set forth in this section, any rules adopted pursuant to this article, and any requirements prescribed by the Commission. Each insurer shall maintain for examination by the Bureau all records, schedules, and data supporting this certificate for a period of five years. To the extent an insurer has identified areas, systems, or processes that require material improvement, updating, or redesign, the insurer shall document the identification and the remedial efforts planned and underway to address such areas, systems, or processes. Such documentation must be available for inspection by the Commissioner.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-624. Investigation of a cybersecurity event.
- If a licensee learns that a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred, the licensee or an investigator shall conduct a prompt investigation.
-
During the investigation, the licensee or an investigator shall, at a minimum, determine as much of the following information as possible:
- Determine whether a cybersecurity event has occurred;
- Assess the nature and scope of the cybersecurity event;
- Identify any nonpublic information that may have been involved in the cybersecurity event; and
- Perform or oversee reasonable measures to restore the security of the information systems compromised in the cybersecurity event in order to prevent further unauthorized acquisition, release, or use of nonpublic information in the licensee’s possession, custody, or control.
- If a licensee learns that a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred in a system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee will complete the steps listed in subsection B or make reasonable efforts to confirm and document that the third-party service provider has completed those steps.
- Each licensee shall maintain records concerning all cybersecurity events for a period of at least five years from the date of the cybersecurity event and shall produce those records upon demand of the Commissioner.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-625. Notice to Commissioner.
-
If a licensee has determined that a cybersecurity event has actually occurred, such licensee shall notify the Commissioner, in accordance with requirements prescribed by the Commission, as promptly as possible but in no event later than three business
days from such determination if:
- The licensee is a domestic insurance company, or in the case of a producer, the Commonwealth is the licensee’s home state and the cybersecurity event meets threshold and other requirements prescribed by the Commission; or
- The licensee reasonably believes that the nonpublic information involved is of 250 or more consumers residing in the Commonwealth or the licensee is required under federal law or the laws of another state to provide notice of the cybersecurity event to any government body, self-regulatory agency, or other supervisory body.
-
Notice provided pursuant to this section shall be in electronic form and shall include as much of the following information as possible:
- The date of the cybersecurity event;
- A description of how the nonpublic information was exposed, lost, stolen, or breached, including the specific roles and responsibilities of third-party service providers, if any;
- How the cybersecurity event was discovered;
- Whether any lost, stolen, or breached information has been recovered and, if so, how this was done;
- The identity of the source of the cybersecurity event;
- Whether the licensee has filed a police report or has notified any regulatory, government, or law-enforcement agencies and, if so, when such notification was provided;
- A description of the specific types of information acquired without authorization. Specific types of information include particular data elements such as medical information, financial information, or other information allowing identification of the consumer;
- The period during which the information system was compromised by the cybersecurity event;
- The number of consumers in the Commonwealth affected by the cybersecurity event. The licensee shall provide the best estimate in the initial report to the Commissioner and update this estimate with each subsequent report to the Commissioner pursuant to this section;
- The results of any internal review identifying a lapse in either automated controls or internal procedures, or confirming that all automated controls or internal procedures were followed;
- A description of efforts being undertaken to remediate the situation that permitted the cybersecurity event to occur;
- A copy of the licensee’s consumer privacy policy and a statement outlining the steps the licensee will take to investigate and notify consumers affected by the cybersecurity event; and
- The name of a contact person who is both familiar with the cybersecurity event and authorized to act for the licensee.
- A licensee shall have a continuing obligation to update and supplement initial and subsequent notifications to the Commissioner concerning the cybersecurity event.
- Each licensee shall notify consumers in compliance with § 38.2-626 , and provide a copy of the notice sent to consumers under such section to the Commissioner, when a licensee is required to notify the Commissioner under this section.
- If there is a cybersecurity event in a system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee, once it has become aware of such cybersecurity event, shall treat such event as it would under this section, unless the third-party service provider provides notice in accordance with this section. The computation of a licensee’s deadlines shall begin on the day after the third-party service provider notifies a licensee of the cybersecurity event or the licensee otherwise has actual knowledge of the cybersecurity event, whichever is sooner.
- If a cybersecurity event involves nonpublic information that is used by a licensee that is acting as an assuming insurer or is in the possession, control, or custody of a licensee that is acting as an assuming insurer or its third-party service provider and the licensee does not have a direct contractual relationship with the affected consumers, the licensee shall notify its affected ceding insurers and the head of its supervisory state agency of its state of domicile within three business days of making the determination or receiving notice from its third-party service provider that a cybersecurity event has occurred. Ceding insurers that have a direct contractual relationship with affected consumers shall fulfill the consumer notification requirements imposed under § 38.2-626 and any other notification requirements relating to a cybersecurity event imposed under this section.
- If there is a cybersecurity event involving nonpublic information that is in the possession, custody, or control of a licensee that is an insurer or its third-party service provider and for which a consumer accessed the insurer’s services through an independent insurance producer, the insurer shall notify the producers of record of all affected consumers as soon as practicable as directed by the Commissioner. The insurer is excused from this obligation for those instances in which it does not have the current producer of record information for any individual consumer.
- Nothing in this article shall prevent or abrogate an agreement between a licensee and another licensee, a third-party service provider, or any other party to fulfill any of the investigation requirements imposed under § 38.2-624 or notice requirements imposed under this section.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-626. Notice to consumers.
-
A licensee that maintains consumers’ nonpublic information shall notify the consumer of any cybersecurity event without unreasonable delay after making a determination or receiving notice the cybersecurity event has occurred, if consumers’ nonpublic information
was accessed and acquired by an unauthorized person or such licensee reasonably believes consumers’ nonpublic information was accessed and acquired by an unauthorized person and the cybersecurity event has a reasonable likelihood
of causing or has caused identity theft or other fraud to such consumers. Such notice shall include a description of the following:
- The incident in general terms;
- The type of nonpublic information that was subject to the unauthorized access and acquisition;
- The general acts of the licensee to protect the consumer’s nonpublic information from further unauthorized access;
- A telephone number that the consumer may call for further information and assistance, if one exists; and
- Advice that directs the consumer to remain vigilant by reviewing account statements and monitoring the consumer’s credit reports.
- Notice to consumers under this section shall be given as written notice to the last known postal address in the records of the licensee, telephone notice, or electronic notice. However, if the licensee required to provide notice demonstrates that the cost of providing notice will exceed $50,000, the affected class of consumers to be notified exceeds 100,000 consumers, or the licensee does not have sufficient contact information or consent to provide notice, substitute notice may be provided. Substitute notice shall consist of (i) e-mail notice if the licensee has e-mail addresses for the members of the affected class of consumers; (ii) conspicuous posting of the notice on the website of the licensee if the licensee maintains a website; and (iii) notice to major statewide media.
- In the event that a licensee provides notice to more than 1,000 consumers at one time pursuant to this section, the licensee shall also notify, without unreasonable delay, all consumer reporting agencies that compile and maintain files on consumers on a nationwide basis, as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1681a (p), of the timing, distribution, and content of the notice.
- Notice required by this section shall not be considered a debt communication as defined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in 15 U.S.C. § 1692a.
- Notice required by this section and § 38.2-625 may be delayed if, after the person notifies a law-enforcement agency, the law-enforcement agency determines and advises the person that the notice will impede a criminal or civil investigation or jeopardize national or homeland security. Notice shall be made without unreasonable delay after the law-enforcement agency determines that the notification will no longer impede the investigation or jeopardize national or homeland security.
- If there is a cybersecurity event in a system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee, once it has become aware of such cybersecurity event, shall treat such event as it would under this section, unless the third-party service provider provides notice in accordance with this section. The computation of a licensee’s deadlines shall begin on the day after the third-party service provider notifies a licensee of the cybersecurity event or the licensee otherwise has actual knowledge of the cybersecurity event, whichever is sooner.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-627. Powers and duties of the Commission; exclusive state standards.
- The Commissioner may examine and investigate the affairs of any licensee to determine whether a licensee has been or is engaged in any conduct in violation of this article. This power is in addition to the powers that the Commissioner has under Article 4 of Chapter 13 (38.2-1300 et seq.) and Chapter 18 (38.2-1800 et seq.). Any such investigation or examination shall be conducted pursuant to Chapters 13 and 18.
- Whenever the Commissioner has reason to believe that a licensee has been or is engaged in conduct in the Commonwealth that violates this article, the Commissioner may take action that is necessary or appropriate to enforce the provisions of this article.
- The Commission may examine and investigate the affairs of any insurance-support organization that acts on behalf of an insurance institution or agent as defined in § 38.2-602 and that either (i) transacts business in the Commonwealth or (ii) transacts business outside the Commonwealth and has an effect on a person residing in the Commonwealth, in order to determine whether the insurance-support organization has been or is engaged in any conduct in violation of this article.
- The Commission shall adopt rules and regulations implementing the provisions of this article.
- This article and any rules adopted pursuant to this article establish the exclusive state standards applicable to licensees for data security, the security of nonpublic information, the investigation of cybersecurity events, and notification of cybersecurity events for those individuals and entities subject to this article.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-628. Confidentiality.
- Any documents, materials, or other information in the control or possession of the Bureau that are furnished by a licensee or an employee or agent thereof acting on behalf of licensee pursuant to subsection H of § 38.2-623 or subdivisions B 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 11 § 38.2-625 , or that are obtained by the Commissioner in an investigation or examination pursuant to § 38.2-627 , shall be confidential by law and privileged, shall not be subject to § 12.1-19 , shall not be subject to subpoena, and shall not be subject to discovery or admissible in evidence in any private civil action. However, the Commissioner is authorized to use the documents, materials, or other information in the furtherance of any regulatory or legal action brought as a part of the Commissioner’s duties.
- Neither the Commissioner nor any person who received documents, materials, or other information while acting under the authority of the Commissioner shall be permitted or required to testify in any private civil action concerning any confidential documents, materials, or information subject to subsection A.
-
In order to assist in the performance of the Commissioner’s duties under this article, the Commissioner may:
- Share documents, materials, or other information, including the confidential and privileged documents, materials, or information subject to subsection A, with other state, federal, and international regulatory agencies; with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), its affiliates, or its subsidiaries; and with state, federal, and international law-enforcement authorities, provided that the recipient agrees in writing to maintain the confidentiality and privileged status of the documents, materials, or other information;
- Receive documents, materials, or information, including otherwise confidential and privileged documents, materials, or information, from the NAIC, its affiliates, or its subsidiaries and from regulatory and law-enforcement officials of other foreign or domestic jurisdictions, and shall maintain as confidential or privileged any documents, materials, or information received with notice or the understanding that it is confidential or privileged under the laws of the jurisdiction that is the source of the documents, materials, or information;
- Share documents, materials, or other information subject to subsection A with a third-party consultant or vendor provided the consultant agrees in writing to maintain the confidentiality and privileged status of the documents, materials, or other information; and
- Enter into agreements governing sharing and use of information consistent with this subsection.
- No waiver of any applicable privilege or claim of confidentiality in the documents, materials, or information shall occur as a result of disclosure to the Commissioner under this section or as a result of sharing as authorized in subsection C.
- Documents, materials, or other information in the possession or control of the NAIC or a third-party consultant or vendor as a result of an examination or investigation pursuant to subsection H of § 38.2-623 or subdivisions B 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 11 of § 38.2-625 shall be confidential by law and privileged, shall not be subject to § 12.1-19 , shall not be subject to subpoena, and shall not be subject to discovery in any private civil action.
- Nothing in this article shall prohibit the Commissioner from releasing final, adjudicated actions that are open to public inspection to a database or other clearinghouse service maintained by the NAIC, its affiliates, or its subsidiaries.
History. 2020, c. 264.
§ 38.2-629. Exceptions.
-
The following exceptions shall apply to this article:
- A licensee subject to HIPAA that has established and maintains an information security program pursuant to such statutes, rules, regulations, or procedures established thereunder shall be considered to meet the requirements of § 38.2-623 , provided that licensee is compliant with, and submits a written statement certifying its compliance with, the same, and certifies that it will protect nonpublic information not subject to HIPAA in the same manner it protects information that is subject to HIPAA, and any such licensee that investigates a cybersecurity event and notifies consumers in accordance with HIPAA and any HIPAA-established rules, regulations, or procedures shall be considered compliant with the requirements of §§ 38.2-624 and 38.2-626 .
- An employee, agent, representative or designee of a licensee, who is also a licensee, is exempt from §§ 38.2-623 , 38.2-624 , 38.2-625 , and 38.2-626 and need not develop its own information security program or conduct an investigation of or provide notices to the Commissioner and consumers relating to a cybersecurity event, to the extent that the employee, agent, representative, or designee is covered by the information security program, investigation, and notification obligations of the other licensee.
- A licensee affiliated with a depository institution that maintains an information security program in compliance with the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information (Interagency Guidelines) as set forth pursuant to §§ 501 and 505 of the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, P.L. 106-102, shall be considered to meet the requirements of § 38.2-623 and any rules, regulations, or procedures established thereunder, provided that the licensee produces, upon request, documentation satisfactory to the Commissioner that independently validates the affiliated depository institution’s adoption of an information security program that satisfies the Interagency Guidelines.
- If a licensee ceases to qualify for an exception, such licensee shall have 180 days from the date it ceases to qualify to comply with this article.
History. 2020, c. 264.
Chapter 7. Antitrust Provisions.
§ 38.2-700. When domestic insurer may hold stock of another insurer.
Subject to Article 6 (§ 38.2-1335 et seq.) of Chapter 13 and Chapter 14 (§ 38.2-1400 et seq.) of this title, any domestic insurer may retain, invest in or acquire the whole or any part of the capital stock of any other insurer, unless the effect of such action (i) substantially lessens competition generally or (ii) tends to create a monopoly, in the business of insurance.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-58; 1983, c. 457; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 13A M.J. Monopolies and Restraints of Trade, § 8.
§ 38.2-701. When director of a domestic insurer may be a director of another insurer.
Any domestic insurer may have a director who is also a director of another domestic, foreign or alien insurer, unless the effect thereof (i) substantially lessens competition generally or (ii) tends to create a monopoly, in the business of insurance.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-59; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-702. Violations; procedure; cease and desist orders.
If the Commission has reason to believe that there is a violation of either § 38.2-700 or § 38.2-701 , it shall issue and serve upon the insurer or the director concerned a statement of the charges and a notice of a hearing to be held at a time and place fixed in the notice, which shall not be less than thirty days after notice is served. The notice shall require the insurer or director to show cause why an order should not be issued directing the alleged offender to cease and desist from the violation. At such hearing, the insurer or director shall have an opportunity to be heard and to show cause why an order should not be issued requiring the insurer or director to cease and desist from the violation. In all matters in connection with such charges or hearing, the Commission shall have the jurisdiction, power, and authority granted or conferred upon it by Title 12.1, and, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the procedure shall conform to and the right of appeal shall be the same as that provided in that title.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-60; 1971, Ex. Sess., c. 1; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-703. Cease and desist orders may be entered.
If, after a hearing, the Commission finds that there has been a violation of § 38.2-700 or § 38.2-701 , it may issue an order reciting its findings and directing the insurer or director to cease and desist from the violation.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-61; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-704. Penalties.
- Any person who violates a cease and desist order entered under § 38.2-703 shall be subject to the provisions of § 38.2-218 .
- Any person convicted of violating this chapter may, in addition, be punished under the provisions of Chapter 1.1 (§ 59.1-9.1 et seq.) of Title 59.1.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-62; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-705. Antitrust provision.
Conduct subject to regulation, review or examination pursuant to this title shall, in addition, be subject to the provisions of the Virginia Antitrust Act (§ 59.1-9.1 et seq.).
History. 1986, c. 562.
Chapter 8. Service of Process.
Article 1. Unlicensed Insurers Process.
§ 38.2-800. Definition.
For the purposes of this article, “insurer” includes health services plans, health maintenance organizations, legal services plans, dental or optometric services plans, and unlicensed insurers approved by the Commission to issue surplus lines coverage as respectively provided for in Chapters 42, 43, 44, 45, and 48 of this title.
History. 1986, c. 562; 2007, c. 157.
The 2007 amendments.
The 2007 amendment by c. 157 inserted “and unlicensed insurers approved by the Commission to issue surplus lines coverage” and “and 48” and made related changes.
CASE NOTES
Elements required to invoke regulatory statutes. —
A small element of insurance should not be construed to bring a transaction within the reach of the insurance regulatory laws unless the transaction involves one or more of the evils at which the regulatory statutes were aimed and the elements of risk transfer and distribution give the transaction its distinctive character. GAF Corp. v. County Sch. Bd., 629 F.2d 981, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13938 (4th Cir. 1980).
Warranty not insurance contract. —
Where supplier of roofing materials guaranteed to repair leaks caused by defects in its products and, incidentally, to repair leaks caused by faulty workmanship, the workmanship guarantee is incidental to the warranty against defects in the products sold, and thus the warranty is not a contract of insurance and the supplier is not an unauthorized insurer and is not amenable to service under the Unauthorized Insurers Process Act. GAF Corp. v. County Sch. Bd., 629 F.2d 981, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13938 (4th Cir. 1980).
§ 38.2-801. What constitutes appointment of agent for service of process.
-
The clerk of the Commission shall be deemed to be appointed by any insurer unlicensed in this Commonwealth as its agent for the service of process in accordance with §
13.1-758
if any of the following acts are effected by mail or otherwise in this Commonwealth:
- The issuance or delivery of insurance contracts to residents of this Commonwealth or to corporations authorized to do business in this Commonwealth;
- The solicitation of applications for these insurance contracts;
- The collection of premiums, membership fees, assessments or other considerations for these insurance contracts; or
- The transaction of any other insurance business in connection with these insurance contracts.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-64; 1956, c. 431; 1958, c. 597; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Purpose of this section is different from that of the long arm statute. August v. HBA Life Ins. Co., 734 F.2d 168, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22589 (4th Cir. 1984).
Where a contractor guaranteed to repair leaks caused by defects in its products and, incidentally, to repair leaks caused by faulty workmanship, the workmanship guarantee was incidental to the warranty against defects in the products sold and viewed as a whole, the warranty was not a contract of insurance. The contractor is, therefore, not an unauthorized insurer and is not amenable to service under the Unauthorized Insurers Process Act. GAF Corp. v. County Sch. Bd., 629 F.2d 981, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13938 (4th Cir. 1980).
§ 38.2-802. How process served.
Service of process or notice upon any unlicensed insurer in any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the acts listed in § 38.2-801 in this Commonwealth shall be made in the manner prescribed in § 13.1-758 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-65; 1956, c. 431; 1958, c. 597; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-803. Alternate method of service.
-
Service of process or notice in any action, suit or proceeding shall be valid if:
- Served upon any person within this Commonwealth who, in this Commonwealth on behalf of the unlicensed insurer, is (i) soliciting insurance, (ii) making, issuing, or delivering any insurance contract, or (iii) collecting or receiving any premium, membership fee, assessment or other consideration for insurance; and
- A copy of the process or notice is sent within ten days thereafter by registered mail to the unlicensed insurer at its last known principal place of business.
- A post-office receipt showing the sender’s name, and the unlicensed insurer’s name and address, and the plaintiff’s or plaintiff’s attorney’s affidavit of compliance with the procedures set out in subsection A of this section shall be filed with the clerk of the court in which the proceeding is pending on or before the date the unlicensed insurer is required to appear, or within such further time as the court allows.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-66; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-804. Other legal service not limited.
Nothing in this article shall limit the right to serve any process or notice upon any licensed insurer in any other manner permitted by law.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-67; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Purpose of this section is different from that of the long arm statute. August v. HBA Life Ins. Co., 734 F.2d 168, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22589 (4th Cir. 1984).
§ 38.2-805. When judgment may be entered.
No judgment based on default of appearance shall be entered against any defendant served pursuant to § 38.2-803 until the expiration of thirty days from the date that the affidavit of compliance is filed.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-68; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-806. Defense of action by unlicensed insurer.
-
Before any unlicensed insurer files or causes to be filed any pleading in any action, suit or proceeding instituted against it, that insurer shall either:
- Deposit cash or securities with the clerk of the court in which the action, suit or proceeding is pending, or file with the clerk a bond in an amount to be fixed by the court which shall be sufficient to secure the payment of any final judgment; or
- Procure a certificate of authority and a license to transact the business of insurance in this Commonwealth.
- The court may order a postponement in any action, suit or proceeding in which service is made in the manner provided in § 38.2-802 or § 38.2-803 to afford the unlicensed insurer reasonable opportunity to comply with the provisions of subsection A of this section and to defend the action.
- Nothing in subsection A of this section shall be construed to prevent any unlicensed insurer from appearing specially in the suit or other proceeding in which service was made in the manner provided in this article on the ground either that (i) the insurer has not done any of the acts listed in § 38.2-801 , or (ii) the person on whom service was made pursuant to § 38.2-803 was not doing any of the acts listed in § 38.2-803 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-69; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
Construction of term “pleadings.” —
Virginia General Assembly intended to define the word “pleading” in subsection A of § 38.2-806 in accordance with its own Virginia Supreme Court Rules definition, and not with respect to definitions found elsewhere, such as that in Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Structural Concrete Prods., LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., 244 F.R.D. 317, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54641 (E.D. Va. 2007).
Application. —
If either Va. Sup. Ct. R. 3:8(a) or Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) was applied to § 38.2-806 , defendant insurer’s answer and motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) were considered pleadings for purposes of § 38.2-806 and were not properly filed. However, the insurer’s motion to postpone, construed as a motion for extension of time, was considered a pleading and thus allowed. Structural Concrete Prods., LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., 244 F.R.D. 317, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54641 (E.D. Va. 2007).
§ 38.2-807. Attorney fees.
- In any action against an unlicensed insurer upon an insurance contract issued or delivered in this Commonwealth to a resident of this Commonwealth or to a corporation authorized to do business in this Commonwealth, the court may allow the plaintiff a reasonable attorney fee if (i) the insurer has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the contract for 30 days after demand prior to the commencement of the action and (ii) the court concludes that the refusal was vexatious and without reasonable cause. The fee shall not exceed 33 1/3 percent of the amount that the court or jury finds the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the insurer, but shall be at least $200.
- Failure of the insurer to defend the action shall be deemed prima facie evidence that its failure to make payment was vexatious and without reasonable cause.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-70; 1986, c. 562; 2010, c. 343.
The 2010 amendments.
The 2010 amendment by c. 343 substituted “33 1/3 percent” for “12 1/2 percent” and “$200” for “$100” in the last sentence of subsection A and made a minor stylistic change.
Research References.
Bryson on Virginia Civil Procedure (Matthew Bender). Chapter 14 Costs. § 14.02 Items Included. Bryson.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 5A M.J. Costs, § 3.
CASE NOTES
Presumption that the insurer’s conduct was vexatious and without reasonable cause improper. —
Fact than an insurer was unlicensed at the time that it refused to defend an insured did not entitle the insured to a prima facie presumption that the insurer’s failure to make payments in an underlying lawsuit was vexatious and without reasonable cause under subsection B of § 38.2-807 for purposes of obtaining attorney’s fees for a bad faith failure to defend under § 38.2-209 because subsection B of § 38.2-807 and the presumption applied to situations where an unlicensed insurer failed to defend in an action brought by an insured upon an insurance contract, and the insurer was properly defending itself in the lawsuit. Structural Concrete Prods., LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., No. 3:07CV253, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61714 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2007).
Judge has to determine bad faith. —
Meaning of the Recodification Act is plain: the General Assembly did not intend for the word “court” to include “jury” in this provision; thus, the statute clearly requires the judge, not the jury, to determine whether the insurer acted in bad faith before awarding attorney’s fees to the insured. REVI, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 290 Va. 203 , 776 S.E.2d 808, 2015 Va. LEXIS 114 (2015).
Article 2. Unlicensed Nonresident Brokers and Agents Process.
§ 38.2-808. Definition.
For the purposes of this article, “agent” shall have the meaning as set forth in § 38.2-1800 which shall include a legal services agent, a health agent and a dental or optometric services agent.
History. 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-809. What constitutes appointment of agent for service of process.
The clerk of the Commission shall be deemed to be appointed by any unlicensed nonresident broker or agent as its agent for the service of process pursuant to § 13.1-758 if any of the following acts are effected by mail or otherwise in this Commonwealth by such unlicensed nonresident broker or agent: (i) the issuance or delivery of insurance contracts to residents of this Commonwealth or to corporations authorized to do business in this Commonwealth, (ii) the solicitation of applications for such contracts, (iii) the collection of premiums, membership fees, assessments or other considerations for such contracts, or (iv) the transaction of any other insurance business in connection with such contracts.
History. 1958, c. 180, § 38.1-70.2; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-810. How process or notice served.
Service of process or notice upon any unlicensed nonresident broker or agent in any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the acts enumerated in § 38.2-809 in this Commonwealth shall be made in the manner prescribed in § 13.1-758 .
History. 1958, c. 180, § 38.1-70.3; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-811. Other legal service not limited.
Nothing in this article shall limit the right to serve any process or notice upon any unlicensed nonresident broker or agent in any other manner permitted by law.
History. 1958, c. 180, § 38.1-70.4; 1986, c. 562.
Michie’s Jurisprudence.
For related discussion, see 14B M.J. Process, § 27.
Article 3. Unlicensed Public Adjusters.
§ 38.2-812. Definition.
For the purposes of this article, “public adjuster” shall have the meaning as set forth in § 38.2-1845.1 .
History. 2012, cc. 734, 735.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2012, cc. 734 and 735, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act shall become effective on January 1, 2013.”
§ 38.2-813. What constitutes appointment of agent for service of process.
The Clerk of the Commission shall be deemed to be appointed by any unlicensed public adjuster as its agent for the service of process pursuant to § 13.1-758 if any of the following acts are effected by mail or otherwise in the Commonwealth by such unlicensed public adjuster: (i) the investigation, negotiation, adjustment, or provision of advice to insureds in relation to first party claims arising under insurance contracts that insure real or personal property located in the Commonwealth; (ii) the solicitation of public adjusting for such contracts; (iii) the collection of fees, commissions, salaries, or other considerations for such contracts; or (iv) the transaction of any other insurance business in connection with such contracts.
History. 2012, cc. 734, 735.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2012, cc. 734 and 735, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act shall become effective on January 1, 2013.”
§ 38.2-814. How process or notice served.
Service of process or notice upon any unlicensed public adjuster in any suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or in connection with the acts enumerated in § 38.2-813 in the Commonwealth shall be made in the manner prescribed in § 13.1-758 .
History. 2012, cc. 734, 735.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2012, cc. 734 and 735, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act shall become effective on January 1, 2013.”
§ 38.2-815. Other legal service not limited.
Nothing in this article shall limit the right to serve any process or notice upon any unlicensed public adjuster in any other manner permitted by law.
History. 2012, cc. 734, 735.
Editor’s note.
Acts 2012, cc. 734 and 735, cl. 2 provides: “That the provisions of this act shall become effective on January 1, 2013.”
Chapter 9. Transition Provisions.
§ 38.2-900. Workers’ compensation.
All acts and parts of acts inconsistent with the provisions of this title are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency. However, the provisions of this title shall not amend or repeal any provisions of Title 65.2 relating to workers’ compensation.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-43.1; 1986, c. 562.
CASE NOTES
The General Assembly did not intend to exclude motor vehicle accidents from the workers’ compensation scheme. Had the General Assembly intended to exclude motor vehicle accidents from the coverage of the Workers’ Compensation Act, it would have done so directly in the Act itself, rather than indirectly through a provision in Title 38.2. Smith v. Horn, 232 Va. 302 , 351 S.E.2d 14, 3 Va. Law Rep. 1265, 1986 Va. LEXIS 257 (1986).
§ 38.2-901. References to former sections of Title 38 or Title 38.1.
Wherever any of the conditions, requirements, provisions or contents of any section of Title 38 as such title existed prior to July 1, 1952, or Title 38.1, as that title existed before July 1, 1986, are transferred to a new or different section, and wherever any such old section is given a new section number in this title, all references to the former section of Title 38 or Title 38.1 appearing elsewhere in this Code than in this title shall be construed to apply to the new or renumbered section containing the conditions, requirements, provisions or contents.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-43.2; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-902. Existing licenses.
Each license of an insurer, agent, surplus lines broker, or other person, issued and in force immediately before July 1, 1986, shall continue in force until its date of expiration or until terminated as provided in this title.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-43.3; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-903. Existing form of policy, contract, certificate, application, rider or endorsement.
If any form does not comply with the provisions of this title but did comply with the provisions of any regulation or statute repealed by this Act of Assembly, it may continue to be used for a period of twelve months following July 1, 1986, unless the Commission prescribes otherwise pursuant to authority conferred by law.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-43.4; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-904. Existing rates.
Every rate filed and presently in effect is continued and made effective until new rates are filed and become effective in accordance with the provisions of this title.
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-43.5; 1972, c. 836; 1973, c. 504; 1986, c. 562.
Chapter 10. Organization, Admission and Licensing of Insurers.
Article 1. Organization of Domestic Insurers.
§ 38.2-1000. Incorporation of domestic stock insurers.
Domestic stock insurers shall be incorporated under the provisions of Article 3 (§ 13.1-618 et seq.) of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1. A foreign insurer may become a domestic insurer under the provisions of Article 11 (§ 13.1-705 et seq.) or Article 12 (§ 13.1-715.1 et seq.) of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1. Except as otherwise provided in this title, domestic stock insurers shall be subject to all the general restrictions and shall have all the general powers imposed and conferred by law.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-27, 38-28; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-71; 1956, c. 431; 1986, c. 562; 1995, c. 69; 2005, c. 765.
The 2005 amendments.
The 2005 amendment by c. 765 substituted “(§ 13.1-715.1 et seq.)” for “(§ 13.1-716 et seq.).”
§ 38.2-1001. Incorporation of domestic mutual insurers.
Domestic mutual insurers shall be incorporated under the provisions of Article 3 (§ 13.1-818 et seq.) of Chapter 10 of Title 13.1. A foreign insurer may become a domestic insurer under the provisions of Article 10 (§ 13.1-884 et seq.) or Article 11 (§ 13.1-893.1 et seq.) of Chapter 10 of Title 13.1. Except as otherwise provided in this title, domestic mutual insurers shall be subject to all the general restrictions and shall have all the general powers imposed and conferred by law.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-27, 38-497, 38-498, 38-500, 38-501, 38-502; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-74; 1956, c. 431; 1986, c. 562; 1995, c. 69.
Editor’s note.
At the direction if the Virginia Code Commission, “Article 11 (§ 13.1-893.1 et seq.)” was substituted for “Article 11 (§ 13.1-894 et seq.).”
Cross references.
For constitutional provisions concerning corporations, see Va. Const., Art. IX.
§ 38.2-1002. Additional requirements of articles of incorporation; name.
The articles of incorporation for a domestic mutual insurer shall be signed by at least twenty natural persons, a majority of whom are legal residents of this Commonwealth. The articles shall, in addition to complying with the requirements of Article 3 (§ 13.1-818 et seq.) of Chapter 10 of Title 13.1, set forth the classes of insurance the insurer proposes to write.
History. Code 1950, §§ 38-28, 38-497, 38-498, 38-499; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-75; 1956, c. 431; 1958, c. 596; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-1003. When corporate status attained; bylaws filed with Commission.
A domestic mutual insurer shall have legal existence as soon as the charter has been recorded with the Commission, after which the board of directors named in the charter may adopt bylaws and accept applications for insurance. However, no insurance shall be put in force until the insurer has been licensed to transact the business of insurance as provided by this chapter. The bylaws and any amendments shall be filed with the Commission within thirty days after adoption.
History. Code 1950, § 38-503; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-76; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-1004. Voting.
Each member of a domestic mutual insurer shall have one vote, or a number of votes based upon the insurance in force, the number of policies held, or the amount of premiums paid, as provided in the bylaws of the insurer.
History. Code 1950, § 38-507; 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-77; 1986, c. 562.
§ 38.2-1005. Certain mutual companies and societies not to become stock companies without approval of Commission.
No mutual insurance company, mutual assessment property and casualty insurer, cooperative nonprofit life benefit company, mutual assessment life, accident and sickness company, burial society, or fraternal benefit society shall be converted into a stock corporation unless such conversion and the plan for conversion are approved by the Commission. The insurer shall comply with § 38.2-1028 before approval for conversion is granted by the Commission unless the Commission finds that the insurer will have the required capital and surplus within a reasonable time after conversion. A society or other nonstock company licensed under any chapter of this title except Chapter 10 (§ 38.2-1000 et seq.) shall be licensed as a mutual insurer subject to § 38.2-1029 prior to seeking approval for conversion under § 38.2-1005.1 or § 38.2-1005.1:9 .
History. 1952, c. 317, § 38.1-79; 1970, c. 636; 1986, c. 562; 2001, c. 726.
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 726 inserted “mutual assessment property and casualty insurer” near the beginning of the first sentence and added the last sentence.
§ 38.2-1005.1. Conversion of a domestic mutual insurer to a domestic stock insurer.
- Any domestic mutual insurer may convert to a domestic stock insurer pursuant to a plan of conversion approved by the Commission.
-
The Commission shall approve any such plan of conversion if, after giving notice and an opportunity to be heard to the policyholders of the domestic mutual insurer, the Commission determines that:
- The terms and conditions of the plan are fair and equitable to the policyholders of the domestic mutual insurer;
- The plan is subject to approval by a vote of more than two-thirds of all votes cast on the plan at a meeting of the members of the domestic mutual insurer called for that purpose at which a quorum is present;
- Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 4 of this subsection, the plan allocates and directs that the entire stock ownership interests and other consideration to be distributed pursuant to the plan of conversion be distributed to the policyholders of the domestic mutual insurer;
- In the case of a domestic mutual insurer that converted from a health services plan that was in existence prior to December 31, 1987, the plan of conversion allocates and distributes to the State Treasurer, in addition to any shares of stock that the Commonwealth may be entitled to receive as a policyholder, shares of stock or cash or both with a value equal to the surplus, computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, of such health services plan on December 31, 1987, plus ten million dollars; and
- Immediately after the conversion, the insurer will have the fully paid capital stock and surplus required by applicable law.
- A plan of conversion that utilizes a statutory merger in order to effect a conversion may be approved in accordance with this section and § 38.2-1005.1:9 , and the provisions of § 38.2-1018 shall not be applicable to such plan of conversion.
History. 1996, cc. 801, 831; 2001, c. 726.
Editor’s note.
Acts 1996, cc. 801 and 831, cls. 2, provide: “[t]hat the provisions of this act shall be applicable to all plans of conversion acted on by the State Corporation Commission after the effective date of this act [July 1, 1996].”
Acts 1996, cc. 801 and 831, cls. 3, provide: “[t]hat, on the effective date of this act [July 1, 1996], any plan of conversion then pending before the State Corporation Commission shall not be approved by the Commission unless such plan provides for, or is amended to provide for, the appointment to the initial board of directors of the insurer’s parent company, for a term of three years each, one director from a list of three nominees submitted by the Joint Rules Committee, as defined in § 51.1-124.3 , and one director from a list of three nominees submitted by the Attorney General. Such nominees shall be citizens who do not hold public office and have no direct or indirect financial interest, except as a consumer, in the insurer.”
The 2001 amendments.
The 2001 amendment by c. 726 substituted “in accordance with this section and § 38.2-1005.1:9 ” for “under this section” in subsection C.
Article 1.1. Formation of Mutual Insurance Holding Company; Conversion of Mutual Holding Company to Stock Holding Company.
§ 38.2-1005.1:1. Definitions.
As used in this article:
“Converted company” means a stock insurance company incorporated and organized under the laws of this Commonwealth that continues in existence after a reorganization under this article in connection with the formation of a mutual holding company.
“Converted mutual holding company” means the stock corporation into which a mutual holding company has been converted pursuant to § 38.2-1005.1:9 .
“Eligible member” means a member as of the date the board of directors of a mutual company adopts a plan of MHC conversion under this article. For the conversion of a mutual holding company, the term eligible member means a member of the mutual holding company who is of record on the date the board of directors of the mutual holding company adopts a plan of conversion authorized pursuant to this article.
“Intermediate holding company” means a corporation authorized to issue one or more classes of capital stock, the corporate purposes of which include holding, directly or indirectly, the voting stock of a converted company.
“Member” means a person who, on the records of a mutual company and pursuant to the articles of incorporation or bylaws of a mutual company, is deemed to be the holder of a membership interest in a mutual company. The term member also includes a person insured under a group policy if:
- The person is insured or covered under a group life insurance policy or group annuity contract under which funds are accumulated and allocated to the respective persons covered under such policy or contract;
- The person has the right to direct the application of the funds so allocated;
- The group policyholder does not pay any portion of the premiums or deposits for the policy or contract; and
- The mutual company has the names and addresses of the persons covered under the group life insurance policy or group annuity contract.When a plan of MHC conversion has become effective under this article, the term “member” shall mean a member of the mutual holding company created by such plan. “Mutual company” means a mutual insurance company incorporated and organized under the laws of this Commonwealth and licensed pursuant to Chapter 10 (§ 38.2-1000 et seq.) of this title. “Mutual holding company” or “MHC” means a corporation organized under the provisions of the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act (§ 13.1-801 et seq.) in connection with the reorganization of a mutual company under this article. A MHC shall be subject to the provisions of this article and any other provisions of this title that are applicable to mutual companies and not inconsistent with the provisions of this article. The articles of incorporation of a MHC shall state:
- That its assets shall be subject to inclusion in the estate of the converted company in any proceeding initiated against the converted company under Chapter 15 (§ 38.2-1500 et seq.) of this title. “Plan of MHC conversion” or “plan” means a plan adopted pursuant to this article by the board of directors of a mutual company for the conversion of a mutual company into a direct or indirect stock subsidiary of a mutual holding company. “Policy” includes any group or individual policy or contract issued by a mutual company, including an annuity contract, but does not include a certificate of insurance issued in connection with a group policy or contract. “Policyholder” means the holder of a policy other than a reinsurance contract.
1. That the corporation is organized under this article as a MHC;
2. That the MHC shall hold not less than a majority of the shares of voting stock of a converted company or an intermediate holding company that, in turn, directly or indirectly holds all of the voting shares of a converted company;
3. That the corporation is not authorized to issue capital stock except in accordance with the provisions of § 38.2-1005.1:9 ;
4. That its members shall have the rights specified in this article and its articles of incorporation and bylaws; and
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:2. Formation of mutual holding company and conversion of mutual company.
A mutual company, upon approval of the Commission, may reorganize by forming a mutual holding company and continue the corporate existence of the reorganizing mutual company as a stock insurance company in accordance with the provisions of this article. At the time a plan of MHC conversion becomes effective and without any further action:
- The mutual company shall become a stock corporation, the membership interests of the policyholders in the mutual company shall be deemed extinguished and all eligible members of the mutual company shall become members of the mutual holding company in accordance with the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the mutual holding company and the applicable provisions of this article and Chapter 10 (§ 38.2-1000 et seq.) of this title; and
- All of the shares of capital stock of the converted company shall be issued to the mutual holding company that, at all times thereafter, shall own not less than a majority of the issued shares of the voting stock of the converted company; however, either at the time the conversion becomes effective or, with the Commission’s approval, at any later time, the voting shares of the converted company may be held by one or more intermediate holding companies so long as the mutual holding company at all times owns, directly or indirectly, a majority of the voting shares of the converted company.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:3. Mutual holding company membership interest.
- A member of a mutual holding company shall not transfer membership in the company or any right arising from membership.
- A member of a mutual holding company shall not, as a member, be personally liable for or subject to assessment on account of any act, debt, liability or obligation of the MHC or of any entity owned or controlled by the MHC.
- A membership interest in a mutual holding company shall not constitute a security under the laws of the Commonwealth.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:4. Contents of plan of MHC conversion.
A plan of MHC conversion shall:
-
Include:
- The reasons for the proposed conversion; and
- The effect of the proposed conversion on the mutual company’s existing policies.
-
Provide that:
- All policies of the converted company in force on the effective date of the conversion shall continue in force under the terms of those policies, except that all voting and other membership rights of the policyholders provided for under the policies or under the laws of this Commonwealth and any provisions for contingent liability of members shall be extinguished on the effective date of the plan of MHC conversion.
- The holders of participating policies in force on the date of conversion shall continue to have the right to receive dividends as provided in such policies, if any. However, except in the case of a mutual company’s life insurance policies, guaranteed renewable accident and sickness insurance policies, and non-cancelable accident and sickness insurance policies, if any, a plan may provide that the converted stock company will issue the insured a nonparticipating policy as a substitute for the participating policy on the renewal date of the participating policy next following the date the plan becomes effective.
- If a mutual life insurance company has participating life insurance policies in force on the effective date of the plan of conversion, the converted company will maintain such participating life policies as a closed block of business for dividend purposes, except that any or all classes of group participating policies may be excluded from the closed block. The plan shall provide for the establishment of one or more segregated accounts in connection with the closed block of business and shall allocate to such segregated accounts sufficient assets of the mutual company so that the assets so allocated, together with the revenue for the closed block of business, are sufficient to support the closed block including, but not limited to, the payment of claims, expenses, taxes and any dividends that are provided for under the terms of the participating policies with appropriate adjustments in the dividends for experience changes. The plan shall be accompanied by an opinion of a qualified actuary or appointed actuary who meets the standards provided in this title or the Commission’s regulations for the submission of actuarial opinions as to the adequacy of reserves or assets. The actuarial opinion shall relate to the adequacy of the assets allocated to the segregated accounts of the closed block and shall be based on methods of analysis deemed appropriate for such purposes by the Actuarial Standards Board. The amount of assets allocated to the segregated accounts of the closed block shall be based upon the mutual company’s most recent annual statement updated to the effective date of the conversion. After the effective date of the conversion, the converted company shall keep a separate accounting for the closed block and shall make and include in each annual statement to be filed with the Commission a separate statement showing gains, losses and expenses properly attributable to the closed block. With the Commission’s prior approval, assets allocated to the closed block of business that are in excess of the amount of assets necessary to support the policies then remaining in the closed block shall revert to the benefit of the converted company. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, the Commission may waive the requirement for the establishment of a closed block of participating policies when it deems a waiver to be in the best interests of the participating policyholders of the mutual company.
- Include the requirements for granting membership interest to persons who become policyholders of the converted company subsequent to the effective date of the conversion.
- Include information sufficient to demonstrate that the financial condition of the converted company will not be diminished by the plan of MHC conversion.
- Include a description of any current proposal to issue shares of the converted company or an intermediate holding company to the public or to other persons or entities who are not direct or indirect subsidiaries of the mutual holding company.
- Include the identity of each of the proposed directors and officers of the mutual holding company and each intermediate holding company, if any, together with such biographical information the Commission may require.
- Include such other information as the Commission considers appropriate for inclusion in the plan of MHC conversion.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:5. Adoption and approval of plan of MHC conversion.
- The board of directors of a mutual company may adopt a plan of MHC conversion that is consistent with the provisions of § 38.2-1005.1:4 by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the members of the board. At any time before approval of the plan by the mutual company’s eligible members, the board of directors, by affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of its members, may amend or withdraw the plan.
- After a plan of MHC conversion has been adopted by the board of directors, the plan and all amendments subsequently adopted shall be filed with the Commission for review and approval. In addition to the plan and supporting documents, the filing shall include (i) the form of notice to eligible members required by subdivision E 1 of this section, (ii) the form of any proxy to be solicited from eligible members together with all material to be distributed in connection with such solicitation, (iii) the proposed articles of incorporation and bylaws of the mutual holding company and each intermediate holding company, if any, and (iv) the revised articles of incorporation and bylaws of the converted company.
- Upon receipt of the plan and other documents specified in subsection B of this section, the Commission shall conduct a review of the plan. The Commission shall approve the plan if it determines that the provisions of this article have been complied with and that the plan is fair and equitable as regards the interests of the members of the mutual company. The Commission may in its discretion order a public hearing for the purpose of determining whether the plan complies with the conditions listed in the preceding sentence. The Commission may retain, at the mutual company’s expense, any qualified expert not a member of its staff to assist in its review of the plan.
-
The Commission may condition approval of the plan upon such conditions, stipulations or provisions as it determines are reasonably necessary to protect policyholder interests of the converted company, including, but not limited to:
-
Its prior approval of:
- Any acquisition or formation of affiliate entities of the mutual holding company;
- The capital structure of any intermediate holding company or any subsequent change thereto;
- Any initial public offering or other issuance of equity or debt securities of an intermediate holding company or the converted company by private sale or public offering; and
- Expansion of the activities of the mutual holding company into lines of business, industries or operations not identified or apparent at the time of approval of the plan.
-
Limitations on:
- Dividends and distributions, in addition to those otherwise provided by law, if their effect would be to reduce the capital and surplus of the converted company; and
- The pledge, encumbrance or transfer of the stock of the converted company.
-
Its prior approval of:
-
- Upon approval of a plan of MHC conversion by the Commission, the plan shall be submitted to a vote of the eligible members at an annual or special meeting of the members of the mutual company held not less than twenty-five nor more than sixty days from the date notice of the meeting is given. Notice of the members’ meeting to act on the plan shall be given to each eligible member at the member’s address as shown on the company’s records not later than forty-five days following the date of the Commission’s approval of the plan. The notice shall identify in reasonable detail the benefits and risks of the plan of MHC conversion and shall be accompanied by a copy of the plan or, if authorized by the Commission, a summary thereof; provided, however, that if a summary of the plan is sent with the notice, members shall be advised that a complete copy of the plan will be available without charge upon request. The notice shall state that the Commission has approved the plan but that such approval does not constitute a recommendation that members vote to adopt the plan. E. 1. Upon approval of a plan of MHC conversion by the Commission, the plan shall be submitted to a vote of the eligible members at an annual or special meeting of the members of the mutual company held not less than twenty-five nor more than sixty days from the date notice of the meeting is given. Notice of the members’ meeting to act on the plan shall be given to each eligible member at the member’s address as shown on the company’s records not later than forty-five days following the date of the Commission’s approval of the plan. The notice shall identify in reasonable detail the benefits and risks of the plan of MHC conversion and shall be accompanied by a copy of the plan or, if authorized by the Commission, a summary thereof; provided, however, that if a summary of the plan is sent with the notice, members shall be advised that a complete copy of the plan will be available without charge upon request. The notice shall state that the Commission has approved the plan but that such approval does not constitute a recommendation that members vote to adopt the plan.
- Approval of the plan shall be by the affirmative vote of more than two-thirds of the votes cast by eligible members at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Eligible members may vote in person or by proxy. The number of votes an eligible member may cast shall be determined by the bylaws of the mutual company. If the bylaws contain no such provisions, each eligible member shall be entitled to cast one vote.
- Upon approval of the plan by the eligible members of the mutual company, the articles of incorporation of the mutual holding company, any intermediate holding company, and the converted company shall be adopted and filed with the Commission. In addition, the converted company shall file with the Commission a copy of the minutes of the meeting at which the members approved the plan together with a copy of the bylaws of the mutual holding company, any intermediate holding company, and the converted company. The plan of MHC conversion shall become effective on the date that all of the provisions of this section have been complied with and the new and revised articles of incorporation have been filed and admitted to record in the office of the clerk of the Commission in the manner provided by Chapter 9 (§ 13.1-601 et seq.) of Title 13.1.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:6. Corporate existence.
- Upon conversion of a mutual company to a converted company in accordance with the provisions of this article, the corporate existence of the mutual company shall be continued in the converted company with the original date of incorporation of the mutual company. All rights, franchises and interests of the mutual company in and to any type of property, real, personal, mixed, tangible or intangible, held immediately prior to the effective date of the conversion shall be deemed transferred to and vested in the converted company without further act or deed. Simultaneously, the converted company shall be deemed to have assumed all obligations and liabilities of the mutual company that existed immediately prior to the conversion.
- Unless otherwise provided in the plan of MHC conversion, the directors and officers of the mutual company shall serve as the directors and officers of the converted company until new directors and officers of the converted company are elected in accordance with the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the converted company.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:7. Regulation and authority of a mutual holding company.
- A mutual holding company organized under Title 13.1 pursuant to the authority granted by this article shall have all of the powers granted to a domestic mutual insurance company licensed under Chapter 10 (§ 38.2-1000 et seq.) and shall be subject to the same limitations and restrictions imposed on insurance holding companies by Article 5 (§ 38.2-1322 et seq.), Article 5.1 (§ 38.2-1334.3 et seq.), Article 5.2 (§ 38.2-1334.11 et seq.), and Article 6 (§ 38.2-1335 et seq.) of Chapter 13 as well as all requirements and provisions of the laws of this Commonwealth that are not inconsistent with the provisions of this article except that a mutual holding company shall not have authority to transact insurance pursuant to this title.
- Neither the mutual holding company nor any intermediate holding company shall issue or reinsure policies of insurance.
- A mutual holding company may enter into an affiliation agreement or merger agreement either at the time of the conversion, or at some later time with the approval of the Commission, with any mutual insurance company licensed to transact insurance in this Commonwealth or another mutual holding company. Any such merger agreement may authorize members of the mutual insurance company or other mutual holding company to become members of the mutual holding company. Any such affiliation or merger agreement shall be subject to the provisions of this title relating to transactions entered into by a mutual insurance company organized and licensed under the laws of this Commonwealth.
- The assets of the mutual holding company shall be held in trust under such arrangements and on such terms as the Commission may approve for the benefit of the policyholders of the converted company. Any residual rights of the MHC in such assets or any of the assets of the MHC determined not to be held in trust shall be subject to a lien in favor of the policyholders of the converted company under such terms as the Commission may approve. Upon conversion of the mutual holding company as provided for in § 38.2-1005.1:9 , such assets shall be released from trust in accordance with the plan of conversion approved by the Commission.
History. 2001, c. 726; 2014, c. 248; 2017, c. 643.
The 2014 amendments.
The 2014 amendment by c. 248, effective January 1, 2015, in subsection A, deleted “of this title” following “(§ 38.2-1000 et seq.),” inserted “Article 5.1 (§ 38.2-1334.3 et seq.)” and deleted “of this title” following “of Chapter 13.”
The 2017 amendments.
The 2017 amendment by c. 643, effective January 1, 2018, inserted “Article 5.2 (§ 38.2-1334.11 et seq.)” in subsection A.
§ 38.2-1005.1:8. Diversion of business to affiliates.
Without prior approval of the Commission, neither the converted company nor any person affiliated with or controlling the converted company shall divert business from the converted company to any insurance company affiliated with the converted company if the purpose or effect of such diversion would be to reduce significantly the number of members of the mutual holding company.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:9. Conversion of mutual holding company.
A mutual holding company may reorganize as a stock holding company by complying with the applicable provisions of § 38.2-1005.1 . For the purposes of effecting such conversion, the mutual holding company shall be deemed a mutual insurer and the converted mutual holding company shall be deemed a stock insurer. Notwithstanding any provision of § 38.1-1005.1 to the contrary, the Commission shall approve the reorganization of the mutual holding company as a stock holding company if the Commission determines that the provisions of applicable law have been complied with and that the reorganization is fair and equitable as regards the interests of the members of the mutual holding company. The Commission may in its discretion order a public hearing for the purpose of determining whether the reorganization complies with such conditions.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:10. Conflicts of interest.
No director, officer, agent or employee of a mutual company or other person shall receive any fee, commission or other valuable consideration, other than such person’s regular salary or compensation, for in any manner aiding, promoting, arranging, or assisting in a conversion except as set forth in the plan of MHC conversion approved by the Commission. This provision shall not prohibit the payment of reasonable fees and compensation to attorneys, accountants or actuaries for services performed in the independent practice of their professions notwithstanding the fact that such attorney, accountant or actuary is a director of the mutual company.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:11. Costs and expenses.
All costs and expenses incurred in connection with a plan of MHC conversion shall be paid either by the mutual company or the converted company.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:12. Failure to give notice.
If a mutual company complies substantially and in good faith with the notice requirements in this article, its failure to give any member a required notice shall not impair the validity of any action taken under this article.
History. 2001, c. 726.
§ 38.2-1005.1:13. Limitation on actions.
Any action challenging the validity of or arising out of any act taken or proposed to be taken under this article shall be commenced within thirty days after the date the plan of MHC conversion becomes effective.
History. 2001, c. 726.