CHAPTER 40-01 General Provisions
40-01-01. Definitions.
In this title, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:
- “City” includes cities incorporated under the city council form and city commission system of government, unless the contrary shall appear.
- “Executive officer” means the mayor in council cities or the president of the board of city commissioners in commission cities.
- “Governing body” means the city council or the board of city commissioners, as the case may be, of a municipality concerned or affected.
- “Municipal corporation” or “municipality” includes all cities organized under the laws of this state, but shall not include any other political subdivision.
- “Warrant” means an order drawn by the proper official of the city on its treasury, the warrant or order to be so drawn that when signed by the auditor in an appropriate place it becomes a check on the depository of such city, and no warrant upon the treasury shall be delivered or mailed to the payee or the payee’s agent or representative until such warrant has been signed by the auditor and entered on the auditor’s books as a check drawn on a bank depository.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 63; 1911, ch. 77, § 63; C.L. 1913, § 3833; S.L. 1937, ch. 179, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0101; S.L. 1955, ch. 98, § 8; 1957 Supp., § 40-0101; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 99; 1973, ch. 320, § 3.
Notes to Decisions
Application.
The definitions in this section apply to N.D.C.C. ch. 40-05.1, pertaining to home rule in cities. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
President of City Commission.
President of a city commission was included in the phrase “mayor, chief of police, deputy, sheriff, or other police officers”. State ex rel. Shaw v. Frazier, 39 N.D. 430, 167 N.W. 510, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 40 (N.D. 1918).
Collateral References.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 1, 3.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 2.
Law Reviews.
Summary of significant decisions rendered by North Dakota Supreme Court in 1988 relating to municipal corporations, 64 N.D. L. Rev. 260 (1988).
40-01-02. Municipalities are bodies corporate.
Municipalities shall be bodies politic and corporate under the name and style of “city of _____________________________________ ” and under such name may sue and be sued, contract and be contracted with, acquire and hold real and personal property for corporate purposes, and have an official seal which may be changed at pleasure.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 20; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 1, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2112, 2363; R.C. 1899, §§ 2112, 2363; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 9; R.C. 1905, §§ 2640, 2862; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 6; 1911, ch. 77, § 6; C.L. 1913, §§ 3561, 3776, 3859; R.C. 1943, § 40-0102; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 100; 1973, ch. 80, § 8.
Cross-References.
Authority to contract with federal government, see § 21-06-08.
Liability of political subdivisions, insurance, tax levy or bonds to pay judgment, see ch. 32-12.1.
Municipalities may accept devises, bequests, legacies, and gifts, see § 1-08-04.
Notes to Decisions
- Governmental Immunity Abolished.
- Liability Under Implied Contract.
- Power to Acquire and Hold Property.
Governmental Immunity Abolished.
The doctrine of governmental immunity from tort liability is abolished and governmental bodies, other than state government, are subject to suits for damages by individuals injured by negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of their agents and employees, whether engaged in a proprietary or governmental function; no tort actions will lie against governmental units for those acts which are discretionary in character, including those traditionally deemed legislative or quasi-legislative, judicial or quasi-judicial. Kitto v. Minot Park Dist., 224 N.W.2d 795, 1974 N.D. LEXIS 133 (N.D. 1974).
Liability Under Implied Contract.
When a municipality receives benefits for which it has the power to contract, it may become liable on an implied contract for the reasonable value of those benefits. Grand Forks County v. Grand Forks, 123 N.W.2d 42, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1963).
Power to Acquire and Hold Property.
Cities under the commission form of government have the power to acquire and hold real and personal property for corporate purposes. State ex rel. Herbrandson v. Vesperman, 52 N.D. 641, 204 N.W. 202, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 129 (N.D. 1925).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 1.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 1, 3.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 3(b), 5, 6.
Right of one governmental subdivision to sue another such subdivision for damages, 11 A.L.R.5th 630.
Right of one governmental subdivision to challenge annexation proceedings by another such subdivision, 17 A.L.R.5th 195.
Law Reviews.
Powers and Procedures of City and Village Governing Boards, 31 N.D. L. Rev. 137 (1955).
40-01-03. Judicial notice of existence and change of organization to be taken by courts.
Courts shall take judicial notice of the existence of a municipality by the name and style designated at the time of its incorporation, and of the change of the form of the organization of any municipality from its original form to any other type of organization provided by this title.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 9; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 1, § 4; 1893, ch. 129, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2111, 2352; R.C. 1899, §§ 2111, 2352; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 8; R.C. 1905, §§ 2639, 2851; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 5; 1911, ch. 77, § 5; C.L. 1913, §§ 3560, 3775, 3848; R.C. 1943, § 40-0103.
40-01-04. Vested rights.
All rights and property of every kind and description vested in any municipal corporation previous to any change in its form of organization shall be vested in the same municipal corporation upon its being incorporated under a different type of organization as provided by this title. No rights or liabilities in favor of or against such corporation existing at the time of a change in the form of its organization, and no action or prosecution of any kind shall be affected by such change, but the same shall stand and progress as if no change had been made. When by reason of a change in the form of organization, there is made available a different remedy which is applicable to any right existing before such change became effective, such remedy shall be additional to the remedies theretofore provided.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 1, § 6; R.C. 1895, § 2113; R.C. 1899, § 2113; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 10; R.C. 1905, § 2641; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 7; 1911, ch. 77, § 7; C.L. 1913, §§ 3562, 3777; R.C. 1943, § 40-0104.
40-01-05. Ordinances and resolutions remain in force — Legal identity not changed.
A change in the form of organization of a municipality shall not change its legal identity as a municipal corporation. All ordinances and resolutions in force therein at the date of such change shall continue in full force and effect until repealed or amended.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 1, § 8; R.C. 1895, § 2115; R.C. 1899, § 2115; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 12; R.C. 1905, § 2643; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 8; 1911, ch. 77, § 8; C.L. 1913, §§ 3564, 3778; R.C. 1943, § 40-0105; S.L. 1955, ch. 88, § 4; 1957 Supp., § 40-0105.
Cross-References.
Existing ordinances and regulations to remain in force after code takes effect, see § 1-02-32.
40-01-06. Bonds, contracts, and conveyances — How signed and countersigned.
All bonds, contracts, and conveyances of a municipality, except as otherwise provided, shall be signed by the executive officer and countersigned by the auditor or clerk, as the case may be.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 15, § 41; R.C. 1895, § 2311; S.L. 1897, ch. 102, § 1; R.C. 1899, § 2311; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 188; R.C. 1905, § 2828; C.L. 1913, § 3757; R.C. 1943, § 40-0106; S.L. 1993, ch. 239, § 8.
Cross-References.
Bonds, provisions governing, see ch. 21-03.
Certificates of indebtedness, see ch. 21-02.
Notes to Decisions
Liability for Value when Contract Defective.
When a municipality has the power to contract but there is a defect in the manner of exercising that power, the municipality can be held liable for the reasonable value of benefits received and retained; where city was acting within its powers to enter into a labor agreement with firefighters but the city did not comply with the statutory procedural requirements necessary to form a contract with a municipality, city’s liability to firefighters was limited to the reasonable value of services rendered. Firefighters Local 642 v. Fargo, 321 N.W.2d 473, 1982 N.D. LEXIS 289 (N.D. 1982).
Liability Under Implied Contract.
A municipality may not escape liability for benefits received merely because the methods by which the services were obtained were procedurally defective. Grand Forks County v. Grand Forks, 123 N.W.2d 42, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1963).
40-01-07. Property exempt from taxation and sale on execution.
Lands, houses, moneys, claims receivable, and property and assets of every kind and description belonging to a municipality shall be exempt from taxation and from sale on execution.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 18, § 3; R.C. 1895, § 2335; R.C. 1899, § 2335; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 189; R.C. 1905, § 2829; C.L. 1913, § 3758; R.C. 1943, § 40-0107.
Collateral References.
Execution 22; Taxation 217.
30 Am. Jur. 2d, Executions, § 167; 71 Am. Jur. 2d, State and Local Taxation, §§ 267 et seq.
Exemption from taxation of municipally owned or operated stadium, auditorium, and similar property, 16 A.L.R.2d 1376.
Land acquired by taxing unit by eminent domain as subject to taxation by another taxing unit, 45 A.L.R.2d 522.
Constitutional provision as to exemption from taxation of specified property, purposes, or uses as restricting legislative power to exempt public property, 61 A.L.R.2d 1031.
Municipal property as subject to mechanic’s lien, 51 A.L.R.3d 657.
40-01-08. Removal of building when taxes and special assessments or share of bonded indebtedness are due — Lien — Penalty.
No person may remove a building from any lot or tract of land in any municipality, unless it is assessed as personalty or exempt from taxation, until after the taxes and special assessments then due have been paid, nor until the owner shall have paid into the sinking fund for the retirement of any bonded indebtedness of the municipality an amount equal to the just share of the tax which would then be required against the property in the municipality to pay the principal outstanding, less amount in sinking funds, of the bonded indebtedness of the municipality. The phrase “taxes and special assessments then due” means all taxes and special assessments that have been levied plus a pro rata estimated tax for the current assessment year. For property classified as residential, “special assessments then due” means the sum of the installments of special assessments certified to the county auditor for extension on the tax list plus the pro rata installment of the special assessment to be certified in the current assessment year. If the building is removed without the payment of the taxes and special assessments and pro rata share of bonded indebtedness, the taxes, special assessments, and pro rata share of bonded indebtedness shall be a lien on the building notwithstanding its removal as well as upon the lot, lots, tract, or tracts of land from which the building was removed. This section does not apply where a building is removed to permit the erection or installation of improvements equal or greater in value than the building removed. Any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
Source:
S.L. 1931, ch. 200, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0108; S.L. 1953, ch. 254, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-01-08; S.L. 1975, ch. 106, § 452; 1987, ch. 487, § 1.
40-01-09. Official newspaper of municipality.
The official newspaper as chosen by the electors of the county shall be the official newspaper of the municipality in which it is published, and such official notices and legal publications as the municipality is required to publish by law shall be published therein. In municipalities where the official newspaper is not published, the governing body of the municipality, annually by resolution at its first meeting in May, or as soon thereafter as practicable, shall designate a newspaper published in the municipality, or if there is not one published, then it shall designate a newspaper which is circulated in the municipality, as the official newspaper of the municipality, including park districts therein, for the publication of notices and legal publications, including legal notices and official statements of the school districts embracing or encompassed by the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 46; R.C. 1905, § 2677; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 43; 1911, ch. 77, § 43; C.L. 1913, §§ 3598, 3813; S.L. 1919, ch. 187, § 5; I.M. November 2, 1920, § 1, S.L. 1921, p. 256; 1925 Supp., § 3176a5; R.C. 1943, § 40-0109; S.L. 1971, ch. 386, § 1.
Cross-References.
Publication fees, see § 46-05-03.
Publications required to be made in official newspaper, see § 46-06-09.
Selection of official newspaper and qualifications, see ch. 46-06.
Notes to Decisions
English-Language Newspaper.
In the absence of a statute to the contrary, the requirement of publication of legal notices in a newspaper means a newspaper published in the English language. Reuter v. Dickinson Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 63 N.D. 673, 249 N.W. 778, 1933 N.D. LEXIS 223 (N.D. 1933).
Time of Designation.
The time direction contained in this statute is directory only, and designation of official city paper made in October, instead of May, is valid. Kerlin v. Devils Lake, 25 N.D. 207, 141 N.W. 756, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 119 (N.D. 1913).
Collateral References.
Newspapers 1-1(6).
58 Am. Jur. 2d, Newspapers, Periodicals and Press Associations, §§ 29 et seq.
40-01-09.1. Publication of city government proceedings — Electorate to decide.
Beginning with the 1996 biennial municipal elections, and every four years thereafter, all cities in North Dakota, regardless of their form of government, must put on the ballot the question of whether the minutes of its governing body shall be published in its official newspaper. If voters approve publication, the governing body shall, within seven days after each of its meetings, give its official newspaper, for publication, the complete minutes, or a complete summary showing the substantive actions taken at the meeting.
Roll call votes must be published, but may be indicated as “unanimous” when appropriate. A list of the individual checks written by the city and approved by the governing body, showing the payee and the amount of each check, must be published. However, employee salary checks need not be published if the governing body elects to publish an annual salary schedule for each employee. When applicable, these minutes may be labeled as being published subject to the governing body’s review and revision. The minutes shall continue to be published until disapproved at a succeeding quadrennial election.
Source:
I.M. approved November 8, 1994, S.L. 1995, ch. 637, § 1.
Note.
This section was created by an initiated measure approved by the people at the general election on November 8, 1994.
40-01-10. Certificate of publication filed in auditor’s office — Conclusive evidence — When bill for publication audited.
After any ordinance, notice, resolution, or other proceeding has been published, a copy of the publication, together with the affidavit of publication stating the length of time it has been published, shall be filed with the city auditor. Such affidavit shall be conclusive evidence of the publication. The bill for the publication shall not be audited until such affidavit is filed.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2147; R.C. 1899, § 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, § 2675; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 29, 44; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 29, 44; C.L. 1913, §§ 3596, 3799, 3814; S.L. 1917, ch. 74, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3799; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0110; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 101.
40-01-11. Publication by a city or park district in which no official newspaper is published.
Whenever any ordinance, notice, or other instrument is required by law to be published in a city or park district in which no official newspaper is published, such publication may be made or such notice given by publication of such ordinance, notice, or other instrument in the official newspaper designated pursuant to section 40-01-09. In a county in which no newspaper is published, any notice required by law to be published may be published in a newspaper printed in an adjoining county and having a general circulation in said county.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 22; S.L. 1887, ch. 106, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2365, subs. 18; S.L. 1897, ch. 148, § 1, subs. 18; R.C. 1899, § 2365, subs. 18; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 45; 1905, ch. 186, § 1, subs. 18; R.C. 1905, §§ 2676, 2864, subs. 18; S.L. 1907, ch. 268, § 1, subs. 18; 1913, ch. 291, § 1, subs. 18; C.L. 1913, §§ 3597, 3861, subs. 18; R.C. 1943, § 40-0111; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 102; 1971, ch. 386, § 2.
Cross-References.
Park district publications required, see §§ 40-49-13, 40-49-14.
40-01-12. Claims and accounts against municipalities audited.
No account or claim against a municipality to be paid from any fund, including a municipal utilities fund, shall be allowed by the governing body thereof until a full itemized statement in writing has been filed with the governing body or unless otherwise authorized by the governing body pursuant to contract or other action. The governing body, in its discretion, may require the filing of any additional information which it may deem necessary to the proper understanding and audit of any claim or account and it may require the filing of a sworn statement in such form as it may prescribe. Every account or claim which is allowed by the governing body shall be shown in the minutes of the proceedings of the governing body except that wages and salaries of persons employed by the city may be consolidated and allowed in one order as provided by subsection 15 of section 40-16-03 and reference made in the proceedings of the governing body to the payroll record certified to the city auditor.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 25; R.C. 1895, § 2368; R.C. 1899, § 2368; R.C. 1905, § 2867; C.L. 1913, § 3866; R.C. 1943, § 40-0112; S.L. 1949, ch. 256, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0112; S.L. 1959, ch. 300, § 1; 1969, ch. 365, § 1; 1981, ch. 91, § 29.
40-01-13. Payment of accounts by municipality.
No account or claim shall be paid by a municipality unless the same has been audited and allowed by the governing body thereof. Approval by the governing body shall be recorded in the record of its proceedings and this shall be sufficient to indicate approval without requiring a majority of the members of the governing body to sign or initial the voucher or order for payment. No moneys shall be drawn from the treasury of a municipality except upon a warrant from the auditor thereof signed by the executive officer of the municipality and attested by its auditor or clerk.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 26; R.C. 1895, § 2369; R.C. 1899, § 2369; R.C. 1905, § 2868; C.L. 1913, § 3867; R.C. 1943, § 40-0113; S.L. 1975, ch. 366, § 4.
40-01-14. Office of municipality located in more than one county — Form of official proceeding — Seal.
The officers of a municipality which consists of territory located in more than one county may maintain an office for the performance of their duties in any portion of the municipality. All official proceedings shall be headed with the name of the municipality and of each county of which a portion is embraced within such corporate limits and the name of the state. The official seal which may be used by such municipality shall contain all of such names.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 6; C.L. 1913, § 3937; R.C. 1943, § 40-0114; S.L. 1973, ch. 80, § 9.
40-01-15. Assessors where municipality is in more than one county — Powers and duties of assessors.
In any municipality which contains territory located in more than one county, an assessor shall be elected or appointed in accordance with the law applicable to such form of municipality for that portion of the municipality situated in each county. Such assessor must be a resident of the county in which the assessor is to act and shall have the same powers and duties as an assessor in a municipality situated within the limits of one county.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 266, § 3; 1911, ch. 314, § 7; C.L. 1913, §§ 3564c, 3938; R.C. 1943, § 40-0115.
40-01-16. Duty of auditor relating to assessments in municipality located in more than one county.
The auditor of a municipality embracing territory in more than one county shall transmit the appropriate assessment books, with a certified copy of the minutes showing the proceedings of the board of equalization, to the county auditor of each county in which the municipality is situated. The auditor shall apportion correctly the amount of any tax levy to be certified to each county in accordance with the valuations as determined finally by the equalization board.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 266, § 4; 1911, ch. 314, § 8; C.L. 1913, §§ 3564d, 3939; R.C. 1943, § 40-0116; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 103.
40-01-17. County treasurers’ duties relating to municipality located in more than one county.
If a municipality contains territory located in more than one county, the county treasurer of each county in which such municipality is located shall perform the same duties in relation to all property returned as assessed by the municipality in the county of which the treasurer is an officer as the treasurer performs with relation to property situated in a municipality wholly within such county.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 266, § 5; 1911, ch. 314, § 9; C.L. 1913, §§ 3564e, 3940; R.C. 1943, § 40-0117.
40-01-18. Other provisions applicable to municipalities situated in more than one county.
The holding of elections, organization of the board of elections, the election and term of office of the original officers, and the powers and duties of officers of a city embracing territory in more than one county shall be governed by the provisions of this title relating to cities under the council form of government, or to cities under the commission system of government, as the case may be.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 314, §§ 3, 5, 10; C.L. 1913, §§ 3934, 3936, 3941; R.C. 1943, § 40-0118; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 104.
40-01-19. Provisions of title shall apply to all cities.
All cities in North Dakota shall be governed by the provisions of this title.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 7; R.C. 1905, § 2638; C.L. 1913, § 3559; R.C. 1943, § 40-0119.
40-01-20. Daylight saving time prohibited.
No city or other political subdivision within the state shall adopt daylight saving time or any other seasonal standard of time which varies from the time in effect in such city or political subdivision during the greater portion of the year. All ordinances, resolutions, or other enactments, whether enacted prior to or subsequent to the effective date of this section, are hereby nullified.
Source:
S.L. 1961, ch. 272, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 105.
Collateral References.
Time 14.
74 Am. Jur. 2d, Time, §§ 3, 6.
40-01-21. Removal of city advisory or policy decisionmaking members.
The executive officer of a city and a sixty percent majority of the members-elect of a city’s governing body at a regular meeting of such body may remove any member of an appointive agency, board, or commission which has spending, borrowing, or eminent domain powers and acts in an advisory capacity or assists in policy decisionmaking.
Source:
S.L. 1975, ch. 367, § 1.
40-01-22. Antitrust immunity of cities and city governing bodies.
All immunity of the state from the provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act [Act July 2, 1890, c. 647; 26 Stat. 209; 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] is hereby extended to any city or city governing body acting within the scope of the grants of authority contained in sections 40-05-01, 40-05-02, and 40-05.1-06. When acting within the scope of the grants of authority contained in sections 40-05-01, 40-05-02, and 40-05.1-06, a city or city governing body shall be presumed to be acting in furtherance of state policy.
Source:
S.L. 1983, ch. 454, § 1.
40-01-23. Authorization to organize and participate in an organization of city governments.
- Cities incorporated under the statutes of North Dakota are hereby authorized upon motion of the city governing body to organize and participate in an organization of city governments.
- The organization or organizations authorized hereunder must be organized pursuant to chapter 10-33.
Source:
S.L. 1989, ch. 488, § 1; 1997, ch. 105, § 8.
40-01-24. Firefighters may solicit charitable contributions from motorists.
Notwithstanding section 39-10-34 or any other provision of law, a city, by resolution, may permit permanent, on-duty or off-duty, full-time firefighters employed by the city or volunteers serving the city to solicit charitable contributions from motorists under the following conditions:
- The solicitation is limited to one charitable organization annually which is qualified under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code [26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)] and is registered under state law.
- The solicitation is limited to three days in the calendar year.
- The charitable organization provides the city proof of commercial general liability insurance against claims for bodily injury and property damage that may occur on the public streets, roads, or right of ways as a result of the actions of those soliciting.
Source:
S.L. 2011, ch. 293, § 1.
Effective Date.
This section became effective April 19, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 2 of chapter 293, S.L. 2011.
CHAPTER 40-01.1 Local Governance Advisory Study
40-01.1-01. Advisory study of local governance options.
An advisory study committee may be established under this chapter to provide local citizens and leaders with the means for fully and adequately studying options available for positioning their local governments for effective, creative, and efficient service in the future, in a manner suited to the economic, social, geographic, demographic, and other circumstances influencing the needs and resources of local communities. An advisory study committee is encouraged to prepare a comprehensive program for the performance of local government functions and the furnishing of local government services within the jurisdiction of the governing body or cooperating governing bodies that established the committee. In its study, the committee may consider:
- The need for maintaining citizen access to, control of, and participation in local government;
- The existing land use within the area, including the location of highways and natural geographic barriers to, and routes for, transportation;
- The need for organized local government functions, services, and controls; the present cost and adequacy of local government functions, services, and controls; probable future needs for those functions, services, and controls; and the probable effect of alternative courses of action on the cost and adequacy of local government functions, services, and controls;
- The trends in population density and distribution, and the potential or likelihood for significant growth or decline;
- The tax base and other factors bearing on the capacity for local government to provide essential functions and services necessary to the general welfare of local citizens;
- The boundaries of existing units of local government;
- Data necessary for analyzing the strengths, weaknesses, challenges, and opportunities that are unique to the community; and
- Other factors that may affect the provision of local government functions, services, and controls.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 2.
40-01.1-02. Local advisory study committee.
-
The governing body or electors of a county, city, city park district, township, school district, or any other political subdivision of this state may establish an advisory committee to study the existing form and powers of that political subdivision for comparison with other forms and powers available under the laws of this state. A local advisory study committee is established:
- By a majority vote of the governing body; or
- By a petition signed by ten percent or more of the total number of qualified electors of the political subdivision voting for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election and submitted to the governing body.
- The governing body shall appoint the members of the advisory study committee and set the duration of the committee. The members are not entitled to receive compensation, but may receive actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties as determined by the governing body.
-
The governing body may provide office and meeting space and legal, clerical, facilitation, training, and other assistance to the study committee, and may appropriate funds in its final budget, or expend any unexpended balances in its general fund otherwise designated for current expenditure, for the necessary expenses of the advisory study committee. The committee, with the approval of the governing body, may:
- Employ and fix the compensation and duties of necessary staff;
- Contract and cooperate with other individuals and public or private agencies considered necessary for assistance, including institutions of higher education;
- Establish advisory subcommittees that may include persons who are not members of the study committee;
- Hold public hearings and community forums and use other suitable means to disseminate information, receive suggestions and comments, and encourage public discussion of the committee’s purpose, progress, conclusions, and recommendations;
- Cooperate with a like committee established pursuant to this section by another political subdivision in the conduct of the study. A cooperative study does not preclude a study committee from making separate recommendations to the governing body; and
- Do any other act consistent with and reasonably required to perform its advisory function.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 2; 2009, ch. 346, § 1.
Effective Date.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 346, S.L. 2009 became effective August 1, 2009.
40-01.1-03. Cooperative advisory study committee.
-
The governing bodies of any two or more political subdivisions, including any combination of counties, cities, city park districts, townships, school districts, or other political subdivisions, may establish an advisory committee to study the potential for cooperative or combined efforts for providing local government functions and services. A cooperative advisory study committee is established:
- By execution of a joint powers agreement between participating political subdivisions or by joint resolution pursuant to separate majority votes of each participating governing body; or
- By petitions signed by ten percent or more of the total number of qualified electors of each affected political subdivision voting for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election and submitted to the governing bodies.
- The composition and duration of the advisory study committee is as prescribed in the joint powers agreement, resolutions of the governing bodies, or petitions. However, the governing bodies may agree, by joint resolution, to limit the duration or composition of the advisory study committee created by petition pursuant to subdivision b of subsection 1. Any vacancy may be filled as prescribed in the agreement, resolution, or petitions or, if not prescribed, by the governing body that was represented by the person vacating the position.
-
A governing body may agree to provide office and meeting space and legal, clerical, facilitation, training, and other assistance to the study committee, and may appropriate funds in its final budget, or expend any unexpended balances in its general fund otherwise designated for current expenditure, for the necessary expenses of the advisory study committee. The committee, with the approval of the governing body, may:
- Employ and fix the compensation and duties of necessary staff;
- Contract and cooperate with other individuals and public or private agencies considered necessary for assistance, including institutions of higher education;
- Establish advisory subcommittees that may include persons who are not members of the study committee;
- Hold public hearings and community forums and use other suitable means to disseminate information, receive suggestions and comments, and encourage public discussion of the committee’s purpose, progress, conclusions, and recommendations; and
- Do any other act consistent with and reasonably required to perform its advisory function.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 2.
40-01.1-04. Advisory recommendations.
A local or cooperative advisory study committee established for one or more political subdivisions may recommend that a local governing body or the electors pursue any course of action permitted by law or home rule charter for that political subdivision. The committee may recommend:
-
With respect to a county:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the county and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, or an agreement between the county and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Exercise of the county’s general authority to contract pursuant to section 11-10-01 and any other law, including service agreements with public or private parties under the terms and conditions of the agreements.
- Combination or separation of any elective or appointive county office and corresponding functions, or redesignation of any county office as elective or appointive, pursuant to chapter 11-10.2.
- Change in the number of county commissioners pursuant to chapter 11-12.
- Establishment of a county home rule charter commission for initiating the adoption of a home rule charter or the amendment or repeal of a home rule charter pursuant to chapter 11-09.1, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances for implementing a home rule charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a home rule charter or amendment to a home rule charter.
- Adoption of the consolidated office form of county government pursuant to chapter 11-08.
- Adoption of the county manager form of county government pursuant to chapter 11-09.
- Use of other statutory tools relating to social and economic development, land use, transportation and roads, health, law enforcement, administrative and fiscal services, recording and registration services, educational services, environmental quality, water, sewer, solid waste, flood relief, parks and open spaces, hospitals, public buildings, or other county functions or services, including creation of cooperative county job development authorities pursuant to section 11-11.1-03, multicounty health units pursuant to chapter 23-35, regional planning and zoning commissions pursuant to section 11-35-01, boards of joint county park districts pursuant to chapter 11-28 or a combination of boards of park commissioners with a city pursuant to chapter 40-49.1, or human service zones pursuant to chapter 50-01.1.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- Sharing of elective or appointive county officers with other counties, cities, or other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- Initiation of the multicounty home rule charter process or the amendment or repeal of a multicounty home rule charter pursuant to section 11-09.1-04.1, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances to implement the charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a multicounty home rule charter.
- Initiation of the county-city home rule process or the amendment or repeal of a county-city home rule charter pursuant to chapter 54-40.4, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances to implement the charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a county-city home rule charter.
- Transfer of a power or function of another political subdivision to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- Creation of a county consolidation committee pursuant to chapter 11-05.1.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
-
With respect to a city:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the city and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, or an agreement between the city and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Exercise of the city’s general authority to contract pursuant to section 40-05-01 and any other law, including service agreements with public or private parties under the terms and conditions of the agreements.
- Combination of city officers pursuant to section 40-14-04 or 40-15-05 or the sharing of officers with other cities, counties, or other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- An increase or decrease in the number of members of the governing body of a city pursuant to section 40-06-09.
- Establishment of a city home rule charter commission for initiating the adoption of a home rule charter or the amendment or repeal of a home rule charter pursuant to chapter 40-05.1, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances for implementing a home rule charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a city home rule charter or amendment to a home rule charter.
- Adoption of the commission form of city government pursuant to chapter 40-04.
- Adoption of the modern council form of city government pursuant to chapter 40-04.1.
- Adoption of the city manager plan pursuant to chapter 40-10.
- Sharing an appointive city officer and function with another city, the county, or another political subdivision pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- Initiation of the multicity home rule process or the amendment or repeal of a multicity home rule charter pursuant to section 40-05.1-05.1, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances to implement the charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a multicity home rule charter.
- Initiation of the county-city home rule process or the amendment or repeal of a county-city home rule charter pursuant to chapter 54-40.4, or the adoption, amendment, or repeal of ordinances to implement the charter. The recommendation may include a specific nonbinding proposal or draft for a county-city home rule charter.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- Use of other statutory tools for social and economic development, land use, transportation, health, fire and police protection, street construction and maintenance, assessment, financing, accounting, legal, environmental quality, water, sewer, solid waste, flood relief, parks and open spaces, hospitals, public buildings, or other city functions or services, including the creation of cooperative city job development authorities pursuant to section 40-57.4-03.
- Transfer of a power or function of the city to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- Consolidation of cities pursuant to chapter 40-53.2.
- Dissolution of a city pursuant to chapter 40-53.1.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
-
With respect to a township:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the township and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, or an agreement between the township and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Exercise of the township’s general authority to contract pursuant to section 58-03-01 and any other law, including service agreements with public or private parties under the terms and conditions of the agreements.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- Combination of the offices of township clerk and treasurer pursuant to section 58-05-02 or the sharing of officers with other townships or other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- An increase in the number of board of township supervisors from three to five pursuant to section 58-04-02.1.
- Contract with the county, another political subdivision, or any individual for assessor services pursuant to section 58-05-02.
- Consolidation of boards of township officers pursuant to chapter 58-05.1.
- Transfer of a power or function of the township to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- Creation of an organized civil township pursuant to chapter 58-02.
- Division or annexation of a township pursuant to chapter 58-02.
- Dissolution of the township pursuant to chapter 58-02.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
-
With respect to a city park district:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the city park district and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, or an agreement between the city park district and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Exercise of the city park district’s general authority to contract pursuant to section 40-49-04 and any other law, including service agreements with public or private parties under the terms and conditions of the agreements.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- An increase or decrease in the number of board members pursuant to sections 40-49-07.1 and 40-49-07.2.
- Transfer of a power or function of the city park district to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- Combination of the city board of park commissioners with other city or county boards of park commissioners pursuant to chapter 40-49.1.
- Sharing of officers with other city park districts or other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- Dissolution of the city park district pursuant to sections 40-49-07.1 and 40-49-07.2.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
-
With respect to a school district:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the school district and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, including the exercise of the general powers to make contract for joint educational endeavors, or an agreement between the school district and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- An increase or decrease in the number of school board members pursuant to section 15.1-09-01.
- Sharing of officers with other school districts or other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- School district annexation or reorganization.
- Transfer of a power or function of the school district to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
-
With respect to other political subdivisions, including rural ambulance service districts, rural fire protection districts, irrigation districts, hospital districts, soil conservation districts, and recreation service districts:
- Execution of a joint powers agreement between the political subdivision and one or more other political subdivisions or the state for the cooperative or joint administration of any service or function pursuant to chapter 54-40.3 or as otherwise specifically provided by law, or an agreement between the political subdivisions and a tribal government pursuant to chapter 54-40.2.
- Participation in a community or leadership development, assessment, education, planning, or training program offered by any public or private agency, institution, or organization.
- Sharing of officers with other political subdivisions pursuant to chapter 11-10.3.
- Transfer of a power or function of the political subdivision to the county pursuant to chapter 54-40.5.
- That any other action be taken that is permitted by law.
- That no action be taken.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 2; 1999, ch. 164, § 9; 1999, ch. 242, § 4; 1999, ch. 278, § 65; 2019, ch. 391, § 44, eff January 1, 2020.
CHAPTER 40-02 Incorporation of Municipalities in Unorganized Territory
40-02-01. Requisites for incorporation as city.
Any contiguous territory in this state, not exceeding four square miles [1036.00 hectares] in area, not already included within the corporate limits of any incorporated municipality, may become incorporated as a city whether such territory is located in one or more counties, under the following conditions:
- If the territory has residing therein a population of not more than five hundred inhabitants, it may become incorporated as a city under the council or modern council form of government. If the territory has residing therein a population of not less than five hundred inhabitants, it may become incorporated as a city under the council or modern council form of government, or as a city under the commission system of government.
- If the proposed municipal corporation has, in the view of the board of county commissioners of the county in which the proposed municipal corporation is located, all the qualities necessary to ensure continued viability as a functioning unit of municipal government.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 1, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2108; R.C. 1899, § 2108; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 1, 4; R.C. 1905, §§ 2632, 2635; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 1; 1907, ch. 266, § 1; 1911, ch. 77, § 1; 1911, ch. 314, § 1; 1913, ch. 72, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3552, 3556, 3564a, 3771, 3932; S.L. 1915, ch. 66, § 1; 1921, ch. 31, § 1; 1925 Supp., §§ 3552, 3771; R.C. 1943, § 40-0201; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 106; 1981, ch. 405, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Cities Are Creatures of Statute.
Cities are incorporated through general law of the legislature and are mere creatures of the statute. Waslien v. Hillsboro, 48 N.D. 1113, 188 N.W. 738, 1922 N.D. LEXIS 149 (N.D. 1922).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 1-22.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 15-30, 221.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 10-36.
40-02-02. Census required.
Prior to the commencement of any proceedings to incorporate territory as a municipality, the persons intending to submit the petition for incorporation shall cause a census of the resident population of the territory to be taken not more than sixty days previous to the time when the petition is submitted to the board of county commissioners as provided in this chapter. The census shall show the name of every elector and of every head of a family residing within the territory on that day and the number of persons then belonging to that family, and the census shall be verified by the affidavit of the person taking it.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2345; S.L. 1897, ch. 150, § 1; R.C. 1899, § 2345; R.C. 1905, § 2844; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 2; C.L. 1913, §§ 3841, 3933; R.C. 1943, § 40-0202; S.L. 1981, ch. 405, § 2.
40-02-03. Survey required.
The persons intending to make application for the incorporation of a municipality as provided in this chapter shall cause to be made an accurate survey and map of the territory intended to be embraced within the limits thereof. The survey shall be made by a practical surveyor and shall show the courses and distances of the boundaries and the quantity of land contained therein. The accuracy of such survey and map shall be verified by the affidavit of the surveyor written thereon or annexed thereto.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2344; R.C. 1899, § 2344; R.C. 1905, § 2843; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 2; C.L. 1913, §§ 3840, 3933; R.C. 1943, § 40-0203.
40-02-04. Survey, map, and census subject to examination — Notice.
The survey, map, and census required under the provisions of this chapter, when completed and verified, shall be left for a period of not less than thirty days at some convenient place within the territory described therein for examination by those having any interest in the application for incorporation. There shall be attached to such survey, map, and census a notice which explains:
- The purpose of the map, survey, and census.
- That a petition for incorporation is to be circulated and will be submitted to the board of county commissioners at a time certain as specified in the notice.
- That upon receipt of the petition the board of county commissioners will designate a time and place to consider the petition.
- That a notice of the time and place for the hearing will be published once a week for two weeks prior to the hearing in the official county newspaper and in other newspapers as the board of county commissioners may deem appropriate.
Copies of such notice, together with a statement showing where the survey, map, and census may be examined, shall be posted for at least thirty days in three conspicuous and public places within the territory to be affected.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 3; R.C. 1895, § 2346; R.C. 1899, § 2346; R.C. 1905, § 2845; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 2; C.L. 1913, §§ 3842, 3933; R.C. 1943, § 40-0204; S.L. 1981, ch. 405, § 3.
Notes to Decisions
Failure to Give Notice.
Where notice is not given in conformance with this section the board acquires no jurisdiction in the matter. State ex rel. Brunette v. Sutton, 71 N.D. 530, 3 N.W.2d 106, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1942).
Theory of Statute.
The theory of this statute is that every person interested shall have a right to know what is being attempted so he may be heard respecting anything that is done. State ex rel. Brunette v. Sutton, 71 N.D. 530, 3 N.W.2d 106, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1942).
40-02-05. Petition for incorporation — Contents — Census and survey to accompany — Hearing — Notice.
A petition for the incorporation of a municipality under this chapter shall be addressed to the board of county commissioners of the county in which the proposed municipality is located and if such municipality is located in more than one county, to the board of county commissioners of the county wherein the greater part of the territory is situated, and shall be signed by not less than one-third of the qualified electors residing within the territory described in such petition, and by the owners of not less than fifty percent in assessed value of the property located within the territory described in such petition.
-
The petition shall show:
- The boundaries of the proposed municipality, and the assessed valuation of all property located within such boundaries.
- The number of inhabitants residing within such boundaries.
- The name of the proposed municipality, which shall be different from that of every other municipality in this state.
- A request that the question of incorporating the territory described in the petition as a city under the council form of government or a city under the commission system of government, as the case may be, be submitted to the qualified electors residing within the territory.
-
The petition, when submitted, shall be accompanied by:
- An incorporation plan showing how municipal services, including fire and police protection, street construction and maintenance, sewers, water, garbage disposal, planning, zoning, accounting, assessment, financing, and legal services, will be provided; and
- Any other information that may reasonably be required by the board of county commissioners to whom the petition is addressed including, but not limited to, population, population density, per capita assessed valuation, proximity to populated areas, likelihood of significant growth, need for services, present cost and adequacy of services, and effect of proposed action and alternative actions on adjacent areas.
The petition shall be filed in the office of the county auditor, accompanied by a verified copy of the census required under this chapter and by a duplicate map of the survey of the proposed municipality, and shall be submitted to the board of county commissioners at the time indicated in the notice described in section 40-02-04 or as soon thereafter as the board can receive and consider the same. The board of county commissioners to whom the petition is addressed shall designate a time and place for consideration of the petition and shall notify the petitioners of that time and place. The petitioners shall then cause a notice containing the substance of the petition, and the time and place it will be heard, to be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in the official county newspaper or newspapers of the county or counties and in other newspapers as deemed appropriate by the board of county commissioners of each county embracing the territory to be incorporated.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, §§ 4, 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2347, 2348; R.C. 1899, §§ 2347, 2348; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 4; R.C. 1905, §§ 2635, 2846, 2847; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3556, 3843, 3934; R.C. 1943, § 40-0205; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 107; 1981, ch. 405, § 4; 1985, ch. 235, § 62.
40-02-06. Board of county commissioners to consider petition.
Before hearing the petition, the board of county commissioners shall require proof, either by affidavit or by oral examination of witnesses before it, that notice as required by section 40-02-05 was given and that the survey, map, and census were subject to examination in the manner and for the period required by this chapter. All interested persons shall have the opportunity to comment at the hearing. The board shall have the authority to approve or disapprove, with or without amendment, the petition for incorporation. Before taking action on a petition, the board may consider such factors as the permanent nature of the community, the necessity for incorporation shown by the community, the ability of the community to assume municipal responsibilities, and the showing that the burdens and benefits of incorporation will be equal and just.
The board of county commissioners shall make a written record of its findings on each of the assertions contained in the petition and shall provide any interested person with a copy of those findings. If the board is satisfied that the petition should be approved, it shall make an order fixing the time and the places within the boundaries of the proposed municipality at which an election may be held to determine the question of incorporation as requested in the petition. If the territory described in the petition is located in more than one county, the board shall, after consultation with the board of the other county involved, designate a separate election place in each county in which any part of the territory described in the petition is situated. The board shall name the persons to act as judges of the election in each such election place.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 5; R.C. 1895, § 2348; R.C. 1899, § 2348; R.C. 1905, § 2847; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3844, 3934; R.C. 1943, § 40-0206; S.L. 1981, ch. 405, § 5.
Notes to Decisions
Lack of Jurisdiction.
Where notice is not given in conformance with N.D.C.C. § 40-01-04, the board acquires no jurisdiction over the subject matter. State ex rel. Brunette v. Sutton, 71 N.D. 530, 3 N.W.2d 106, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1942).
40-02-06.1. Appeal of board of county commissioners’ action — Scope of review.
Any final action taken by a board of county commissioners on a petition for incorporation may be appealed to the district court in accordance with the procedure provided in section 28-34-01. The review on appeal extends only to the determination of whether the board of county commissioners has pursued its authority regularly and has not exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its discretion under the provisions of this chapter.
Source:
S.L. 1981, ch. 405, § 10; 1989, ch. 83, § 13.
40-02-07. Notice of election.
The board of county commissioners to which a petition is submitted under this chapter shall give notice of the election on the question whether or not the municipality described in the petition shall be organized. The notice shall be published in one issue of a newspaper or newspapers published within the territory described in the petition, and such publication shall be made at least ten days prior to the date set for the election. If no newspaper is published within the territory, the notice shall be published in the official county newspaper or newspapers and in other newspapers as deemed appropriate by the board of county commissioners of each county embracing the territory to be incorporated.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 6; R.C. 1895, § 2349; R.C. 1899, § 2349; R.C. 1905, § 2848; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3845, 3934; R.C. 1943, § 40-0207; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 91; 1981, ch. 405, § 6.
Collateral References.
Elections 39-42; Municipal Corporations 12(6, 8).
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 265 et seq.
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 136-140; 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 22, 25.
40-02-08. Polling hours at election on question of incorporation.
At the election called to vote on the question of incorporation of a municipality under this chapter, the polls shall be opened at nine a.m. on the day specified in the notice and shall be kept open until seven p.m. At such election, the voters first shall proceed to the election of three inspectors, who, after being chosen and qualified and one of their number elected clerk, without delay shall proclaim that the polls are open.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, §§ 7, 8; R.C. 1895, §§ 2350, 2351; R.C. 1899, §§ 2350, 2351; R.C. 1905, §§ 2849, 2850; C.L. 1913, §§ 3846, 3847; S.L. 1937, ch. 181, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0208.
Notes to Decisions
Late Opening of Polls.
Opening the polls at a later hour than fixed by statute is an irregularity that does not render the election void, in the absence of a showing of fraud or prejudice to qualified electors. Williams v. Sherwood, 51 N.D. 520, 200 N.W. 782, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 60 (N.D. 1924).
40-02-09. Form of ballot.
The ballots to be used at an election to pass upon the question of the organization of a municipality under the provisions of this chapter shall be in substantially the following form:
Shall (city under the council form of government, or city under the commission system of government, as the case may be) be organized out of the following described territory (describe territory involved)? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 9; S.L. 1893, ch. 129, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2352; R.C. 1899, § 2352; R.C. 1905, § 2851; C.L. 1913, § 3848; R.C. 1943, § 40-0209; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 108.
40-02-10. Election returns — To whom made — Duty of board of county commissioners.
The election officials acting in each place in which votes are cast in an election held under this chapter shall return to the board of county commissioners which ordered the election a verified statement of the results of the election showing the number of votes cast for and against incorporation at their polling place. The returns shall be verified by the affidavit of the election officials. The returns shall be canvassed by the board of county commissioners, and the results of the canvass and of the election shall be entered upon the minutes of the proceedings of such board. If a majority of the votes cast on the question at the election favored incorporation, the board shall make an order declaring that the territory described in the petition has been incorporated as a city under the council form of government or as a city under the commission system of government, as the case may be, by the name described in the petition, stating that name, and shall cause the order to be entered in the minutes of its proceedings. If the territory is located in more than one county, a certified copy of such order shall be submitted immediately to each of the other counties within which a portion of the territory described in the order is situated. The auditor of each county to which a certified copy of the order is submitted shall make a record of the order in the minutes of the board of county commissioners of such county.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 9; S.L. 1893, ch. 129, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2352; R.C. 1899, § 2352; R.C. 1905, § 2851; S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 4; C.L. 1913, §§ 3848, 3935; R.C. 1943, § 40-0210; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 109; 1981, ch. 405, § 7; 1997, ch. 108, § 18; 2017, ch. 154, § 13, eff August 1, 2017.
40-02-11. Division into wards.
If a majority of the votes cast on the question at the election provided for in this chapter favored incorporation as a city, the board of county commissioners that ordered the election shall, if the territory has been incorporated as a city under the council form of government, divide the city into wards. The city may not be divided into wards unless it has more than six hundred inhabitants. If the city has more than six hundred inhabitants, one ward must be formed for each two council members to which the city is entitled. In cities of more than fifteen thousand inhabitants, however, the number of wards is limited to seven originally, and that number may be increased thereafter as provided in this title. Each ward must be formed from contiguous territory, and all wards must be numbered consecutively and must have, as nearly as practicable, the same number of inhabitants. After the election of council members, the governing body of the city shall form or establish wards pursuant to law.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 10; R.C. 1895, § 2353; R.C. 1899, § 2353; R.C. 1905, § 2852; C.L. 1913, § 3849; R.C. 1943, § 40-0211; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 92; 1967, ch. 323, § 110; 1981, ch. 405, § 8; 1991, ch. 440, § 2; 1997, ch. 108, § 19.
40-02-12. Order of incorporation — Recording — Filing — As evidence.
An order of incorporation of a city under the council form of government, under the provisions of this chapter, as made by the board of county commissioners to which the petition for incorporation is addressed, shall be conclusive evidence of the incorporation of the territory described in the order in all suits by or against the municipality described therein. The board shall cause a certified copy of the order to be filed for record in the office of the recorder of each county affected and a certified copy shall also be filed in the office of the secretary of state.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3935; R.C. 1943, § 40-0212; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 111; 1981, ch. 405, § 9; 2001, ch. 120, § 1.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Description of Territory.
The incorporation of a village is not invalid because the order of the board of county commissioners declaring the result of the election misdescribed the territory. Billings Sch. Dist. v. Loma Special Sch. Dist., 56 N.D. 751, 219 N.W. 336, 1928 N.D. LEXIS 196 (N.D. 1928).
40-02-13. Procedure in the case of incorporation of city under the commission system of government.
If the municipality organized under the provisions of this chapter is a city under the commission system of government, the board of county commissioners shall make returns to the secretary of state, and a patent shall be issued by the governor in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 40-04, and with like effect.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 11; 1911, ch. 77, § 11; C.L. 1913, § 3781; R.C. 1943, § 40-0213.
40-02-14. Board of county commissioners to establish election precincts.
The territory embraced within the boundaries of a municipality organized under this chapter shall be divided by the board of county commissioners which made the order of incorporation into election precincts. If the municipality is situated in more than one county, there shall be at least as many election precincts as there are portions of counties embraced within such municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 314, § 5; C.L. 1913, § 3936; R.C. 1943, § 40-0214.
40-02-15. Division of property and indebtedness between municipality and township.
If a municipality is organized under the provisions of this chapter from territory which has been a part of a civil township, any property owned, and any debts owed, by the township prior to the separation shall be divided between the municipality and the township in the proportion which the valuation of the property in the municipality bears to the valuation of the property in the township. The valuations used shall be the valuations as equalized by the board of county commissioners at the last equalization previous to the separation. Real estate which is owned jointly shall belong to the municipality if it is situated therein, and in such case, the municipality shall pay to the township its proportion of the value thereof and shall assume its just proportion of any indebtedness thereon.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 264, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3902; R.C. 1943, § 40-0215.
Notes to Decisions
Purpose of Statute.
This section contemplates equalization of indebtedness and property in the event of division, annexation, or consolidation of a municipal corporation. North Fargo v. Fargo, 49 N.D. 597, 192 N.W. 977, 1923 N.D. LEXIS 70 (N.D. 1923).
40-02-16. Arbitration of differences between township and newly organized municipality upon division of property and indebtedness.
If the officers of a township and of a municipality which has been organized from territory situated therein cannot agree upon the valuation of any real estate, or of any indivisible property which is held jointly, or upon the just apportionment of the joint indebtedness, the officers of the township or municipality, upon five days’ notice of the time and place, may apply to the director of the office of administrative hearings for arbitration of such differences. Thereupon, the director shall appoint three residents of the county, not residents or taxpayers of the municipality or township involved, to act as arbitrators. After being duly sworn to perform the duties imposed upon them, the arbitrators shall view and appraise the property and fix the valuation thereof for the purpose of making the division. If the property to be divided is personal property and no satisfactory arrangement can be made otherwise, it must be sold at public auction to the highest bidder, and the municipality and township may bid at the sale. The township and municipality involved in the arbitration shall share equally in the costs and expenses of the arbitration. The director of the office of administrative hearings shall request payment from the township and municipality and the township and municipality shall pay to the office of administrative hearings both the costs and expenses of the arbitration proceedings and the cost of the services provided by the arbitrators and the director of the office of administrative hearings.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 264, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3902; R.C. 1943, § 40-0216; S.L. 1991, ch. 326, § 152; 2013, ch. 92, § 7.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 7 of chapter 92, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
CHAPTER 40-03 Council Cities, Procedure for Incorporation [Repealed]
[Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285]
CHAPTER 40-03.1 Change from Council System to Commission System
40-03.1-01. Change from council system of government — Petition required.
Any city which shall have operated for more than six years since the adoption of the city council system of government or since the last election at which the question of changing from the council system was rejected by a vote of the qualified electors, may change its organization thereunder and adopt the city commission form of government. The proceeding to change shall be initiated by a petition asking for such change signed by not less than forty percent of the qualified electors of the city, as determined by the total number of qualified electors voting at the preceding general election. The signatures to such petition need not be appended to a single paper, but one of the signers upon each paper shall make oath before an officer competent to administer oaths that each signature appearing upon such paper is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Each petition, in addition to the names of the signers, shall contain the name, address, and age of each petitioner, and the length of the petitioner’s residence in the city. Any petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw that petitioner’s name from a petition within five days after the petition is filed.
Source:
S.L. 1961, ch. 271, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 63.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Powers of City Commissioners.
The board of city commissioners of a city having the commission system of government succeeds to the powers possessed by the mayor and the city council in a city having the council form of government. Waslien v. Hillsboro, 48 N.D. 1113, 188 N.W. 738, 1922 N.D. LEXIS 149 (N.D. 1922).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 44, 46.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 160.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 87-92.
Law Reviews.
Powers and Procedures of City and Village Governing Boards, 31 N.D. L. Rev. 137 (1955).
40-03.1-02. City auditor to pass on sufficiency of petition.
Within thirty days after a petition to change from the council system of government is filed, the city auditor shall examine the petition and ascertain from the voters’ register whether or not the petition is signed by the required number of qualified electors. The city auditor shall attach to the petition the city auditor’s certificate showing the result of the city auditor’s examination, and if the city auditor finds the petition to be insufficient, the city auditor’s certificate shall show the reason for such determination. An insufficient petition may be amended within ten days after the city auditor’s certificate is made. Within thirty days after an amended petition is filed, the city auditor shall make an examination thereof, and if the city auditor’s certificate shows such amended petition to be insufficient, the petition shall be returned to the person filing the same without prejudice to the filing of a new petition. If the city auditor shall find the petition or the amended petition to be sufficient, the city auditor shall place the same with the city auditor’s certificate before the governing body of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1961, ch. 271, § 2; 1985, ch. 235, § 64.
40-03.1-03. Procedure when petition to change from council system of government is filed — Special election — Ballot.
When a petition to change from the council system of government, together with the city auditor’s certificate of sufficiency, is filed with the governing body of a municipality, the governing body shall call a special election at which only the question of changing from the council system of government will be submitted. The date of such election shall not be less than thirty days nor more than ninety days after the date of the auditor’s certificate has been filed. The election shall be conducted, returns thereof made, and the result thereof declared in all respects as are other city elections. Notice of such election shall be given by the publication of the proposition to be voted upon, the places where the election will be held, and the date of the election, in each newspaper published in the city, not more than twenty days and not less than five days before the date of such election. The ballot to be used at the election provided for in this section shall be in substantially the following form:
Shall the city of change from its organization under the council system of government and become a city under the commission form of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
S.L. 1961, ch. 271, § 3.
CHAPTER 40-03.2 Change from Council System to Modern Council System
40-03.2-01. Change from council system of government — Petition required.
Any city incorporated as a city under the council form of government may change its organization thereunder and adopt the modern council form of government. The proceeding to change shall be initiated by a petition asking for such change signed by not less than one-third of the qualified electors of the city. For the purpose of this section, the term “qualified electors of the city” means the total number of qualified electors voting at the preceding general election of the city. The signatures to such petition need not be contained in a single paper, but one of the signers upon each paper shall make oath before an officer competent to administer oaths that each signature appearing upon such paper is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Each petition, in addition to the names of the signers, shall contain the address of each petitioner, and the length of the petitioner’s residence in the city. Any petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw that petitioner’s name from a petition within five days after the petition is filed.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 366, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 65.
40-03.2-02. City auditor to pass on sufficiency of petition.
Within thirty days after a petition to change from the council system of government is filed, the city auditor shall examine the petition and ascertain from the voters’ register whether or not the petition is signed by the required number of qualified electors. The city auditor shall attach to the petition the city auditor’s certificate showing the result of the city auditor’s examination, and if the city auditor finds the petition to be insufficient the city auditor’s certificate shall show the reason for such determination. An insufficient petition may be amended within ten days after the city auditor’s certificate is made. Within thirty days after an amended petition is filed, the auditor shall make an examination thereof, and if the city auditor’s certificate shows such amended petition to be insufficient, the petition shall be returned to the person filing the same without prejudice to the filing of a new petition. If the city auditor shall find the petition or the amended petition to be sufficient, the city auditor shall place the same with the city auditor’s certificate before the governing body of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 366, § 2; 1985, ch. 235, § 66.
40-03.2-03. Procedure when petition to change from council system of government is filed — Special election — Ballot.
When a petition to change from the council system of government, together with the city auditor’s certificate of sufficiency, is filed with the governing body of a municipality, the governing body shall call a special election at which only the question of changing from the council system of government will be submitted. The date of such election may not be less than thirty days nor more than ninety days after the date the auditor’s certificate has been filed. The election must be conducted, returns thereof made, and the result thereof declared in all respects as are other city elections. Notice of such election must be given by the publication of the proposition to be voted upon, the places where the election will be held, and the date of the election, in each newspaper published in the city, not more than twenty days and not less than five days before the date of such election. The ballots to be used at the election provided for in this section must be in substantially the following form:
Shall the city of change from its organization under the council system of government and become a city under the modern council form of government with a five-member (or seven-member, nine-member, or eleven-member) council? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 366, § 3; 1987, ch. 488, § 1.
CHAPTER 40-04 Commission Cities, Incorporation from Organized Territory and Change from Commission System to Council System
40-04-01. Incorporation as commission city.
Any city in this state having a population of not less than five hundred inhabitants may become incorporated as a city under the commission system of government as provided in this section. If one-tenth of the qualified electors of the municipality, based upon the votes cast for the office of governor at the last preceding general election, petition the governing body of the municipality to submit to a vote of the qualified electors the question of whether the city shall become incorporated as a city under the commission system of government, the governing body shall submit the question to the qualified electors, appoint a time when and place or places where the election shall be held, and designate the judges and clerks at the election. The question may not be submitted more than once in every four years.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 1; 1911, ch. 77, § 1; 1913, ch. 72, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3771; S.L. 1915, ch. 66, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3771; R.C. 1943, § 40-0401; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 112; 1985, ch. 235, § 67.
Collateral References.
Withdrawal of name from petition and time therefor, 27 A.L.R.2d 604.
40-04-02. Notice of election.
Notice of an election to be held under this chapter shall be given by the executive officer of the city by publication in the official newspaper of the city as provided in section 40-01-09 for at least twenty days.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 2; 1911, ch. 77, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3772; R.C. 1943, § 40-0402; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 93; 1977, ch. 375, § 3.
40-04-03. Form of ballot.
The ballots to be used at such election shall be in substantially the following form:
Shall the city of (naming the city) become organized as a city under the commission system of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 3; 1911, ch. 77, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3773; R.C. 1943, § 40-0403; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 113.
40-04-04. Returns and canvass of election — Certificate to secretary of state — Officers to continue until election.
The officials of an election held under the provisions of this chapter shall make a return of such election to the governing body of the city and such governing body shall canvass such returns and cause the result of the canvass to be entered upon the records of the city. If a majority of the votes cast on the question at such election shall be for city organization under the commission system, the auditor shall certify the adoption of such form of government and a copy of the proceedings concerning the same to the secretary of state together with the result of any special census taken in such city. The city officers then in office shall exercise the powers conferred upon like officers of a city operating under the commission system of government until their successors are elected and qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 3, 9, 10; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 3, 9, 10; C.L. 1913, §§ 3773, 3779, 3780; R.C. 1943, § 40-0404; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 114; 1973, ch. 80, § 10; 1997, ch. 108, § 20.
40-04-05. Patent issued to city by governor.
Upon the certification of the matters described in section 40-04-04, the government shall issue letters patent, under the great seal of the state, reciting the facts, defining the boundaries of the city, and constituting the city a body corporate and politic by the name of the city of _________ (specifying the name of the city), and declaring that it shall be governed by the provisions of this title applicable to cities under the commission system of government.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 3, 9, 10; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 3, 9, 10; C.L. 1913, §§ 3773, 3779, 3780; R.C. 1943, § 40-0405.
40-04-06. Patent to city to be recorded — Use as evidence.
A patent issued by the governor under the provisions of this chapter shall be recorded in the office of the secretary of state. Any patent so issued and recorded and the record thereof, or a certified copy thereof, shall be conclusive evidence in all courts and places of the due incorporation of the city mentioned therein and of all the facts therein recited.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 11; 1911, ch. 77, § 11; C.L. 1913, § 3781; R.C. 1943, § 40-0406; 2021, ch. 85, § 18, eff August 1, 2021.
40-04-07. Special election called to elect city commissioners.
Within twenty days after the issuance of a patent incorporating any city under the provisions of this chapter, the executive officer of the city voting such incorporation shall call a special election for the purpose of electing the first board of city commissioners. The election shall be held as provided in section 40-21-02.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 4; 1911, ch. 77, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3774; R.C. 1943, § 40-0407; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 115.
40-04-08. Change from or to commission system of government — Petition required.
Any city that has operated for more than six years under or since changing from the city commission system of government may change its governmental organization and adopt the city council form of government or the modern council form of government or revert to the city commission form of government. The proceeding to change or revert shall be initiated either by a resolution by the governing body or by a petition asking for such change signed by not less than twenty-five percent of the qualified electors of the city. In no event, however, shall the petition contain less than thirty signatures. In any city having six or more municipal election precincts, not more than twenty percent of the petitioners may reside in any single precinct. For purposes of this section, the term “qualified electors of the city” means the total number of qualified electors voting for the office of the chief executive officer of the city at the preceding city election. The signatures to such petition need not be appended to a single paper, but one of the signers upon each paper shall make oath before an officer competent to administer oaths that each signature appearing upon such paper is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that such person purports to be not less than eighteen years of age and a resident of the city. Each petition, in addition to the names of the signers, shall contain the name of the street upon and the number of the house in which each petitioner resides. Any petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw that petitioner’s name from a petition within five days after the petition is filed. If the proceeding to change from or revert to a commission system of government is initiated by petition, the question may not be placed on the ballot more often than every four years.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 5; 1913, ch. 79, § 5; C.L. 1913, § 3839; R.C. 1943, § 40-0408; S.L. 1957, ch. 275, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0408; S.L. 1959, ch. 301, § 1; 1961, ch. 273, § 1; 1965, ch. 285, § 10; 1981, ch. 406, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 68.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Signatures on Petition.
A petition for an election to vote upon the question of whether a city operating under the commission form of government should abandon its organization under the commission system and return to the aldermanic system of city government had to be signed by not less than forty percent of the electors of the city at the time the petition was presented. State ex rel. Alexander v. Evanson, 64 N.D. 603, 255 N.W. 98, 1934 N.D. LEXIS 240 (N.D. 1934).
40-04-09. City auditor to pass on sufficiency of petition to change from commission system of government.
Within thirty days after a petition to change from the commission system of government is filed, the city auditor shall examine the petition and ascertain whether or not the petition is signed by the required number of qualified electors. The city auditor shall attach to the petition the city auditor’s certificate showing the result of the city auditor’s examination, and if the city auditor finds the petition to be insufficient the city auditor’s certificate shall show the reason for such determination. An insufficient petition may be amended within ten days after the city auditor’s certificate is made. Within thirty days after an amended petition is filed, the city auditor shall make an examination thereof, and if the city auditor’s certificate shows such amended petition to be insufficient, it shall be returned to the person filing the same without prejudice to the filing of a new petition. If the city auditor shall find the petition or the amended petition to be sufficient, the city auditor shall place the same, with the city auditor’s certificate, before the governing body of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 5; 1913, ch. 79, § 5; C.L. 1913, § 3839; R.C. 1943, § 40-0409; S.L. 1961, ch. 273, § 2; 1985, ch. 235, § 69.
40-04-10. Procedure upon filing of petition to change from or revert to commission system of government — Election — Ballot.
When a petition to change from or revert to the commission system of government, with the city auditor’s certificate of sufficiency, is filed with the governing body of a city, or when a resolution to change or revert has been adopted, the governing body shall call a special election at which only the question of changing from or reverting to the commission system of government will be submitted. The date of such election shall not be less than sixty days nor more than ninety days after the date of the auditor’s certificate that a sufficient petition has been filed. The ballot to be used at the election shall include the issue presented in the petition or resolution in substantially one of the following forms:
CHANGE FROM COMMISSION SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT Shall the city of change from its organization under the commission system of government and become a city under the council form of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of change from its organization under the commission system of government and become a city under the modern council form of government with a five-man council? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of change from its organization under the commission system of government and become a city under the modern council form of government with a seven-man council? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of change from its organization under the commission system of government and become a city under the modern council form of government with an eleven-man council? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ REVERSION TO COMMISSION SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT Shall the city of revert from the council form of government to the commission system of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of revert from the modern council form of government with a five-man council to the commission system of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of revert from the modern council form of government with a seven-man council to the commission system of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭ Shall the city of revert from the modern council form of government with an eleven-man council to the commission system of government? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 5; 1913, ch. 79, § 5; C.L. 1913, § 3839; R.C. 1943, § 40-0410; S.L. 1961, ch. 273, § 3; 1965, ch. 285, § 12; 1981, ch. 406, § 2.
40-04-11. Procedure when election favors changing from commission system of government.
If a majority of the votes cast on the question at the election provided for in section 40-04-10 favor the proposition submitted at such election, the officers elected at the next biennial election shall be those prescribed by the provisions of this title relating to cities organized under the city council form of government. Upon the qualification of such officers, the city shall become a city under the council form of government.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 5; 1913, ch. 79, § 5; C.L. 1913, § 3839; R.C. 1943, § 40-0411; S.L. 1997, ch. 108, § 21.
CHAPTER 40-04.1 Modern Council Form of Government
40-04.1-01. City council — Membership — Terms.
The governing body of a city operating under the modern council form of government is the city council, which is composed of not less than four members, one of whom is the mayor, all elected at large or by wards. Candidates for the council shall run for either mayor or council member but not both at the same time. The terms of members of the council shall be four years, or until their successors are elected and qualified. However, the council shall establish by ordinance a procedure whereby one-half of all council members, as nearly as is practicable, are elected biennially. The number of council members may be increased or decreased pursuant to section 40-06-09.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 1; 1987, ch. 488, § 2; 1993, ch. 401, § 29.
Law Reviews.
Towards Home Rule for North Dakota Cities, 42 N.D. L. Rev. 164 (1966).
40-04.1-02. Compensation of council members.
The members of the council are entitled to receive such compensation for their services as is fixed by ordinance.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 2; 1993, ch. 401, § 30; 2001, ch. 357, § 1.
40-04.1-03. Vacancies on city council — How filled.
If a vacancy occurs in the office of councilman by death, resignation, or otherwise, the city may call a special election to fill such vacancy for the unexpired term or may after fifteen days of the date of such vacancy appoint a person from the ward or city at large by which the councilman previously holding was elected or appointed to fill such vacancy until the next city election, at which election the unexpired term shall be filled.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 3.
40-04.1-04. Restrictions on council member.
A city council member is not eligible for any other office the salary of which is payable out of the city treasury and may not hold any other office under the city government.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 4.
40-04.1-05. Meetings — Regular, special, and for organization.
The city council shall hold its regular meetings at least once a month and may prescribe by ordinance the manner in which special meetings may be called. The city council shall establish by resolution or ordinance the date of its regular meetings. The first meeting for the organization of the city council must be held on the fourth Tuesday in June of each even-numbered year.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 5; 1991, ch. 441, § 1; 1991, ch. 442, § 3; 2003, ch. 339, § 1.
40-04.1-06. Mayor.
The mayor shall preside at meetings of the council, and be the recognized head of the city for all ceremonial purposes and by the governor for purposes of military law. The mayor continues to have all the rights and privileges as a member of the council. If a vacancy occurs in the office of mayor or if the incumbent is absent or disabled, a mayor pro tempore shall be selected by the council from among their number to act for the unexpired term or during continuance of the absence or disability.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 6.
40-04.1-07. Council — Duties and powers.
The council shall perform all duties prescribed by law or by city ordinances and shall see that the laws and ordinances are faithfully executed.
Source:
S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 7.
CHAPTER 40-05 Powers of Municipalities
40-05-01. Powers of all municipalities.
The governing body of a municipality shall have the power:
- Ordinances. To enact or adopt all such ordinances, resolutions, and regulations, not repugnant to the constitution and laws of this state, as may be proper and necessary to carry into effect the powers granted to such municipality or as the general welfare of the municipality may require, and to repeal, alter, or amend the same. The governing body of a municipality may adopt by ordinance the conditions, provisions, and terms of a building code, a fire prevention code, a plumbing code, an electrical code, a sanitary code, vehicle traffic code, or any other standard code which contains rules and regulations printed as a code in book or pamphlet form by reference to such code or portions thereof alone without setting forth in said ordinance the conditions, provisions, limitations, and terms of such code. When all or part of any such code has been incorporated by reference into any ordinance, it has the same force and effect as though it had been spread at large in such ordinance without further or additional posting or publication. A copy of such standard code or portion thereof shall be filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the city auditor of such municipality prior to adoption. The adoption of any such standard code by reference shall be construed to incorporate such amendments thereto as may be made therein from time to time, and such copy of such standard code so filed shall at all times be kept current in the office of the city auditor of such municipality. The adoption of any such code or codes heretofore by any municipality is hereby validated. Fines, penalties, and forfeitures for the violation thereof may be provided within the limits specified in this chapter notwithstanding that such offense may be punishable also as a public offense under the laws of this state.
- Finances and property. To control the finances, to make payment of its debts and expenses, to contract debts and borrow money, to establish charges for any city or other services, and to control the property of the corporation.
- Appropriation. To appropriate money for corporate purposes only, and to provide for the payment of debts and expenses of the corporation.
- Tax levy. To levy and collect taxes on real and personal property for general and special purposes.
- Borrowing money. To borrow money on the credit of the corporation for corporation purposes and to issue bonds therefor as limited and provided by title 21.
- Refunding obligations. To issue bonds in place of or to supply means to meet maturing bonds, or for the consolidation or funding of bonds or any floating indebtedness of the municipality in the manner provided in title 21.
- Certificates of indebtedness. To borrow money in anticipation of revenues to be derived from taxes already levied as provided and limited in title 21.
- Streets, sidewalks, and public grounds. To lay out, establish, open, alter, repair, clean, widen, vacate, grade, pave, park, or otherwise improve and regulate the use of streets, alleys, avenues, sidewalks, crossings, and public grounds, and to acquire, construct, maintain, and operate parking lots and facilities for motor vehicles; to regulate or prevent any practice having a tendency to annoy persons frequenting the same; and to prevent and regulate obstructions and encroachments upon the same.
- Powers relating to parks — Planting grass and trees — Powers respecting parks. To regulate the planting of trees and grass on boulevards, berms, parks, parkways, and public grounds, and to exercise the same powers as are granted to a board of park commissioners respecting the parks of the municipality, if any, until the municipality has been organized into a park district.
- Lighting of public places. To provide for the lighting of streets, alleys, avenues, parks, and public grounds.
- Lights to inhabitants of city. To provide for the furnishing of lights to the inhabitants of the city.
- Gas and water mains — Sewers — Electric light and gas plants. To regulate the laying of gas or water mains and pipes, and the building, laying, or repairing of sewers, tunnels, and drains, and the erecting of gas and electric light plants. Any company or association of persons organized for the purpose of manufacturing illuminating gas or electricity to supply municipalities and the inhabitants thereof shall have authority, subject to existing rights, with the consent of the governing body of the municipality, to erect gas or electric light works and lay down pipes and string wires or poles in streets or alleys subject to such regulations as the municipality may prescribe by ordinance.
- Structures under sidewalks — Snow and obstructions. To regulate the use of all structures under sidewalks and to require the owner or occupant of any premises to keep the sidewalks in front of or along such premises free from snow or other obstruction.
- Streets — Cleanliness of and injury to. To regulate and prevent the throwing or depositing of ashes, offal, dirt, garbage, or any offensive matter in, and to prevent injury to, any street, avenue, alley, or public ground.
- Curbs and gutters. To provide for and regulate curbs and gutters.
- Advertising and obstructions in public places. To regulate and prevent the use of streets, sidewalks, and public grounds for signs, signposts, awnings, telegraph and telephone poles, posting handbills and advertisements, the exhibition or carrying of banners, placards, advertisements, or handbills, and the flying of flags, banners, or signs across the streets or from houses.
- Traffic and sales in public places. To regulate traffic and sales upon the streets, sidewalks, and public places.
- Speed of vehicles and locomotives. To regulate the speed of vehicles and locomotives within the corporate limits of the corporation, except that the speed limit for vehicles on those streets designated as part of any state highway shall be determined by mutual agreement with the director of the department of transportation.
- Numbering lots. To regulate the numbering of houses and lots.
- Naming streets. To name and change the name of any street, avenue, alley, or other public place.
- Railroad companies — Ditches and rights of way. To require railroad companies to make, keep open, and repair ditches, drains, sewers, and culverts along and under their tracks so that filthy and stagnant pools of water cannot stand on their grounds or right of way and so that the natural or artificial drainage of adjacent property shall not be impeded. To require railroad companies to fence their respective railroads or any portion of the same and construct cattle guards and public roads and keep the same in repair within the limits of the corporation.
- Extending ways and pipes over railroad property. To extend by condemnation, subject to chapter 32-15, or otherwise any street, alley, or highway over, under, or across, or to construct or lay any sewer, water pipe, or main under or through, any railroad track, right of way, or land of any railroad company within the corporate limits.
- Culverts, drains, and cesspools. To construct and keep in repair culverts, drains, sewers, catch basins, manholes, cesspools, vaults, cisterns, areas, and pumps within the corporate limits.
- Licenses. To fix the amount, terms, and manner of issuing and revoking licenses.
- Plumbers and plumbing business. To adopt, by ordinance, if it has a system of waterworks or sewerage, rules and regulations governing plumbing, drainage, and ventilation of plumbing within the limits of the municipality. The standards provided for in such ordinance, however, shall not be lower than the minimum standards provided for in any state plumbing code adopted pursuant to chapter 43-18, but may be higher than such standards. It may prescribe rules and regulations for all materials, constructions, alteration and inspection of pipes, tanks, and fixtures by which water is supplied to the citizens of the municipality, or by which waste or sewage is carried, and may provide that such pipes, tanks, and fixtures shall not be placed in any building in the municipality except in accordance with plans which are approved under the provisions of said ordinance, and that no plumbing shall be done except by plumbers registered and licensed under state law and under the ordinance, except by a property owner on that person’s own premises which are occupied as that person’s home or place of residence. The ordinance may provide that all work done by an owner upon that person’s own premises must comply with the provisions of the state plumbing code or a local ordinance, whichever shall prescribe the highest standards. Before the municipality may require a plumber to be licensed by the municipality, it shall provide standards for plumbing in a municipality equal to or in excess of those provided by the state plumbing code. A municipality may adopt the state plumbing code as a whole as an ordinance of the municipality by reference without the necessity of publishing the text therefor.
- Transient business and amusements. To license, tax, regulate, remove, suppress, and prohibit fortune-tellers, astrologers, and all persons practicing palmistry, clairvoyancy, mesmerism, and spiritualism, hawkers, peddlers, pawnbrokers, theatricals and other exhibitions, shows and amusements, ticket scalpers, and employment agencies, and to revoke the license at pleasure, except that the provision in this subsection with reference to hawkers and peddlers shall not apply to persons selling or offering for sale the products raised or grown on land within this state.
- Draymen, taxi drivers, porters, and others pursuing like occupations. To license, tax, regulate, and prescribe the rates charged by draymen, parcel delivery men, busdrivers, taxi drivers, porters, expressmen, watermen, and others pursuing like occupations, and the operation of taxicabs. Provided, all motor vehicles used in ridesharing arrangements, as defined in section 8-02-07, are not taxicabs.
- Runners for stages and other things or persons. To license, regulate, tax, and restrain runners for stages, buses, cars, public houses, or other things or persons.
- Alcoholic beverages. To regulate the use and to regulate and license the sale of alcoholic beverages subject to the provisions contained in title 5.
- Bowling alleys, pool, billiards, theaters, and motion picture theaters. To license, regulate, and tax bowling alleys, theaters, motion picture theaters, and pool or billiard tables, or any other tables or implements kept or used for similar purposes in any public place.
- Markets, market houses, and slaughterhouses. To establish, purchase, erect, lease, rent, manage, maintain, regulate, and provide for the use of markets and market houses, municipal slaughterhouses, or abattoirs.
- Dairy, meat, and food products — Inspection and regulation of sale. To provide for the inspection of milk, cream, and butter sold within the limits of the municipality, and of any dairy or dairy herd kept for the production of such milk, cream, and butter. To prescribe the terms upon which sales of such milk, cream, and butter may be made and to fix penalties for violations. To prescribe regulations for the slaughtering of animals to be sold as meat. To prescribe generally sanitary and regulatory provisions as applied to food products sold within the limits of the municipality and to prohibit the sale of impure and diseased milk or other food products.
- Public peace in municipality. To provide for keeping and preserving the peace and quietude of the municipality, prevent disorderly conduct, prohibit public intoxication, and prevent and suppress riots, affrays, disturbances, and disorderly assemblies in any place.
- Fire limits. To prescribe fire limits within which wooden buildings shall not be erected, placed, or repaired without permission; provide that when a building within such limits has been damaged by fire, decay, or otherwise to the extent of fifty percent of its valuation, it shall be torn down and removed; prescribe the manner of ascertaining such damage; provide for the removal of any structure or building erected contrary to the prescribed rules; declare each day’s continuance of such building or structure a separate offense and to prescribe the penalties therefor; and define fireproof material.
- Fire hazards. To prevent and provide for remedying any dangerous construction or condition of any building, enclosure, or manufactory, or any equipment used therein; regulate and prevent the carrying on of manufactories creating a fire hazard; prevent a deposit or keeping of ashes or refuse in unsafe places; and require all buildings and places to be put and kept in a safe condition.
- Waterworks system. To purchase, acquire by eminent domain in accordance with chapter 32-15, erect, lease, rent, manage, and maintain any system of waterworks, well reservoirs, pipes, machinery, buildings, and all other property comprising a waterworks system, such as hydrants, supply of water, fire stations, fire signals, fire engines, or fire apparatus that may be of use in the prevention and extinguishment of fires, and to fix and regulate the rates, use, and sale of water.
- Fire equipment — Use beyond municipal limits. To use its fire department to attend to fires and render assistance to other municipalities within or without this state, or to private property, including farm buildings located outside the city limits, and the fire department, its members, and apparatus, when engaged outside the limits of the municipality, shall be deemed to be engaged in the performance of a public duty as fully as if serving within the limits of the municipality.
- Storage of combustible material — Use of fireworks and open flame lights. To regulate and prohibit the storage of combustible or explosive material, the use of open flame lights, the building of bonfires, and the use or sale of firecrackers and fireworks.
- Lumberyards. To regulate or prohibit the keeping of any lumberyard and the keeping or selling of any lumber or other combustible material within the fire limits.
- Steam boilers. To provide for the inspection of steam boilers.
- Jails. To establish, maintain, and regulate a jail and, with the consent of the board of county commissioners, to use the county jail for the confinement of persons charged with or convicted of the violation of any ordinance.
- Cruelty to animals. To prohibit and punish cruelty to animals.
- Vagrants and prostitutes. To restrain and punish vagrants, mendicants, and prostitutes.
- Nuisances. To declare what shall constitute a nuisance and to prevent, abate, and remove the same.
- Health regulations. To make regulations necessary or expedient for the promotion of health or for the suppression of disease.
- Cemeteries. To establish, maintain, and regulate cemeteries within or without the municipality, acquire land therefor by purchase or otherwise, and cause cemeteries to be removed, and to prohibit the establishment thereof within, or within one mile [1.61 kilometers] of, the corporate limits.
- Animals and poultry. To regulate or prohibit the running at large of animals and poultry, provide for the establishment and maintenance of public pounds for the impounding of any animals or poultry running at large or tethered in any street in violation of municipal ordinances, establish procedures for the impounding and discharging of animals and poultry impounded, make the expenses and fines imposed a lien upon such stock or poultry, and provide for the sale of the stock or poultry to satisfy such lien.
- Packinghouses and other offensive businesses. To control the location and regulate the management and construction of packinghouses, renderies, bone and soap factories, slaughterhouses, livery stables, and blacksmith shops, and to prohibit any offensive or unwholesome business within, or within one mile [1.61 kilometers] of, the corporate limits.
- Unwholesome or nauseous places. To compel the owner of any cellar, stable, pigsty, privy, sewer, or other unwholesome or nauseous thing or place to cleanse, abate, or remove the same, and to regulate the location thereof.
- Public buildings. To construct, operate, and maintain all public buildings necessary for the use of the municipality.
- Auctioneers, brokers, lumberyards, and public scales. To license, tax, and regulate auctioneers, brokers, lumberyards, and public scales.
- Supplies. To provide that supplies needed for the use of the municipality shall be furnished by contract let to the lowest responsible bidder.
- Secondhand and junk stores. To license, tax, and regulate secondhand and junk stores and to forbid and punish the purchase and receipt by them from minors of any articles without the written consent of their parents or guardians.
- Insure public property. To insure the public property of the municipality.
- Real and personal property. To acquire by lease, purchase, gift, condemnation, or other lawful means and to hold in its corporate name for use and control as provided by law, both real and personal property and easements and rights of way within or without the corporate limits or outside this state for all purposes authorized by law or necessary to the exercise of any power granted.
- Transfer property. To convey, sell, dispose of, or lease personal and real property of the municipality as provided by this title.
- Franchises. To grant franchises or privileges to persons, associations, corporations, or limited liability companies, any such franchise, except when given to a railroad company, to extend for a period of not to exceed twenty years, and to regulate the use of the same, franchises granted pursuant to the provisions of this title not to be exclusive or irrevocable but subject to the regulatory powers of the governing body.
- Airports. To acquire, establish, construct, expand, own, lease, control, equip, improve, maintain, operate, regulate, and police airports and landing fields within or without the geographic limits of the municipality as provided in title 2.
- Public works project. To accept aid from, cooperate and contract with, and to comply with and meet the requirements of any federal or state agency for the establishment, construction, and maintenance of public works, including dams and reservoirs for municipal water supply, for water conservation, flood control, prevention of stream pollution, or sewage disposal. In furtherance thereof to acquire by purchase, lease, gift, or condemnation the necessary lands, rights of way, and easements for such projects, and to transfer and convey to the state or federal government, or any agency thereof, such lands, rights of way, and easements in consideration of the establishment and construction of, and the public benefits which will be derived from any such project. To enter into an agreement with any such government, agency, or municipality within or without this state, to hold such government, agency, or municipality harmless from any and all liability or claim of liability arising from the establishment, construction, and maintenance of such works, and to indemnify such government, agency, or municipality for any such liability sustained by it and to pay all costs of defending against any such claim. In furtherance thereof to acquire by purchase, lease, gift, or, subject to chapter 32-15, condemnation, the necessary lands, rights of way, and easements for such projects, and to transfer and convey to such government, agency, or municipality, such lands, rights of way, and easements in consideration of the establishment and construction of, and the public benefits which will be derived from any such project, or to pay the cost of the acquisition of such lands, rights of way, and easements by such government, agency, or municipality. All actions herein authorized may be taken by resolution duly adopted by the governing body of the municipality. Any and all actions and proceedings heretofore taken by any municipality which are within the authority granted by this subsection are hereby legalized and validated.
- Special improvement assessments — Satisfaction. To make assessments as limited by the laws of this state for local improvements on property adjoining or benefited thereby, to collect the same in the manner provided by law, and to satisfy the tax lien on lands subject to special assessments.
- Public water supply. To prevent the pollution of or injury to any water supply belonging to the municipality or any public water supply within, or within one mile [1.61 kilometers] of, the limits of the municipality.
- Band. To levy a tax as provided in this title for the purpose of providing a fund for the maintenance or employment of a band for municipal purposes.
- Radio reception. To regulate the installation and operation of motors and other electrical or mechanical devices so as to prevent interference with radio reception.
- Municipal plants. To sell, convey, and dispose of the plant or equipment of any public utility owned by the municipality and to contract for the leasing or operation of such plant, equipment, or utility by others, and to grant to the lessee or operator under such a contract the right to purchase such plant, equipment, or utility upon such terms and conditions as may be expressed in the contract, after authorization as provided by this title.
- Public dances. To license, tax, and regulate public dances or public dancehalls.
- Light and power plants and gas transmission or distribution systems. To purchase, acquire by eminent domain in accordance with chapter 32-15, erect, lease, rent, manage, and maintain electric light and power plants, gasworks, steam heating plants and appurtenances for distribution, and to regulate and fix the rates to its patrons and to jointly, with other municipalities, acquire by eminent domain, erect, construct, lease, rent, manage, and maintain any artificial or natural gas transmission or distribution lines or plants.
- Flood control projects. To acquire, construct, maintain, operate, finance, and control flood control projects, both within and adjacent to such municipality, and for such purpose to acquire the necessary real property and easements therefor by purchase and eminent domain, in accordance with chapter 32-15, and to adopt such ordinances as may reasonably be required to regulate the same.
- Public restrooms. To acquire, construct, maintain, operate, finance, and control public restrooms and facilities within such municipality, and for such purpose to acquire the necessary real property therefor by purchase and eminent domain, in accordance with chapter 32-15, and to adopt such ordinances as may reasonably be required to regulate the same.
- Employee pension system. To adopt, by ordinance, a city employee pension system that may provide all rules and regulations governing its operation and discontinuance, provided other pension systems allowed by statute are not in effect, excepting firefighters relief associations and federal social security, or in order to consolidate existing pension plans. In addition to all other rules and regulations deemed necessary and proper by the governing body, it may provide as to matters pertaining to membership, tax levies in an amount not exceeding the total levies authorized by chapters 40-45 and 40-46, membership fees and assessments, management, investments, acceptance of money and property, retirement conditions and payment amount, continuance of system and discontinuance procedures, discontinuance payments, entrance into contracts with an insurance firm or firms for coverage of the employee pension system.
- Television towers. To construct and maintain relay and booster towers for the improved reception of educational and entertainment television programs.
- Contracts. To contract and be contracted with.
- Community development block grant program. To loan or grant money to and secure a mortgage from individuals, associations, corporations, or limited liability companies and to purchase ownership shares or membership interests in corporations, limited liability companies, or other business associations as provided through the procedures established by the state’s community development block grant program established pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 [Pub. L. 93-383; 88 Stat. 633; 42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.]. This power applies to all community development block grant transactions of the governing body, including any transactions prior to July 1, 1987. A city is not lending its funds or extending its credit to any individual, association, or organization under this subsection and no general liability on the part of the city is incurred.
- Encouragement of arts. To, consistent with section 54-54-01, appropriate and disburse city moneys and to accept and disburse moneys received from federal, state, county, city, or private sources for the establishment, maintenance, or encouragement of arts within the city. The authority of a city under this subsection is supplemental to the authority provided in chapter 40-38.1.
- To expend city funds for the purpose of participating in an organization of city governments under section 40-01-23.
- To participate and enact or adopt ordinances necessary for participation in the nation’s historic preservation program as a certified local government, as provided for under 36 CFR 61.5.
- Lease of waterworks or sewage systems. To lease, for a term not to exceed ninety-nine years, the plant or equipment of any waterworks, mains, or water distribution system and any property related thereto pursuant to subsection 5 of section 40-33-01 or to lease, for a term not to exceed ninety-nine years, any sewage system and all related property for the collection, treatment, purification, and disposal in a sanitary manner of sewage pursuant to section 40-34-19.
- Appointed board budgets. To require that financial records, including all revenues, expenditures, fund balances, and complete budgets, be submitted to the governing body of the municipality at a time and in a format requested by that governing body by all boards, authorities, committees, and commissions with members appointed by the governing body before the governing body’s approval of the budget and tax levy.
- To expend city funds as a donation for a capital improvement project to a nonprofit health care facility within the city.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 22; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 1; 1887, ch. 105, § 1; 1887, ch. 106, § 1; 1890, ch. 100, §§ 1, 2; R.C. 1895, §§ 2148, 2365, 2459; S.L. 1897, ch. 102, § 1; 1897, ch. 148, § 1; 1899, ch. 40, § 1; 1899, ch. 172, § 1; R.C. 1899, §§ 2148, 2365, 2459; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 47; 1905, ch. 95, § 16; 1905, ch. 186, § 1; R.C. 1905, §§ 2105, 2678, 2864, 2963; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 48; 1907, ch. 90, § 17; 1907, ch. 268, § 1; 1909, ch. 92, § 26; 1911, ch. 5; 1911, ch. 73, § 1; 1911, ch. 77, § 48; 1913, ch. 75, § 1; 1913, ch. 83, § 1; 1913, ch. 291, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 2860, 3599, 3818, 3861, 3863, 3990; S.L. 1917, ch. 75, § 1; 1921, ch. 34; 1923, ch. 222, § 20; 1923, ch. 326; 1925, ch. 104; 1925 Supp., §§ 2079b1 to 2079b13, 2889b20, 3599, 3818; S.L. 1927, ch. 270, § 1; 1929, ch. 86, § 1; 1931, ch. 92, §§ 1, 2; 1931, ch. 191, §§ 1, 2; 1931, ch. 202, § 1; 1933, ch. 175, §§ 1, 3; 1933, ch. 247; 1935, ch. 283, § 1; 1939, ch. 9, § 1; 1941, ch. 187, § 8; R.C. 1943, § 40-0501; S.L. 1947, ch. 281, § 1; 1947, ch. 284, § 1; 1949, ch. 257, § 1; 1949, ch. 258, § 1; 1949, ch. 259, § 1; 1955, ch. 254, § 2; 1955, ch. 259, § 6; 1957 Supp., § 40-0501; S.L. 1959, ch. 285, § 4; 1959, ch. 302, § 1; 1959, ch. 303, § 1; 1963, ch. 286, § 1; 1963, ch. 287, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 116; 1969, ch. 367, § 1; 1971, ch. 387, § 1; 1971, ch. 594, § 2; 1975, ch. 119, § 13; 1979, ch. 444, § 1; 1981, ch. 131, § 10; 1981, ch. 407, § 1; 1985, ch. 453, § 2; 1985, ch. 454, § 1; 1987, ch. 489, § 1; 1989, ch. 488, § 2; 1993, ch. 54, § 106; 1993, ch. 402, § 1; 1999, ch. 211, § 16; 1999, ch. 503, § 9; 2003, ch. 340, § 1; 2003, ch. 341, § 1; 2003, ch. 342, § 3; 2007, ch. 293, § 17; 2015, ch. 88, § 17, eff for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016; 2015, ch. 89, § 2, eff August 1, 2015.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 17 of chapter 88, S.L. 2015 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 89, S.L. 2015 is effective August 1, 2015.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 17 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007 became effective April 5, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 47 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007.
Note.
Section 40-05-01 was amended 2 times by the 2015 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to Section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in Section 2 of Chapter 89, Session Laws 2015, House Bill 1376; and Section 17 of Chapter 88, Session Laws 2015, Senate Bill 2056.
This section is set out above to make a correction in the 2007 cumulative supplement.
Cross-References.
Advertising purposes, power of city to levy tax for, see § 57-15-10.1.
Airports and landing fields, see ch. 2-02.
Alcoholic beverages, retail licensing, see ch. 5-02.
Archaeological and paleontological materials reserved in land dispositions, see § 55-03-06.
Bonds, provisions governing, see ch. 21-03.
Borrow money and issue municipal obligations, power to, see § 21-03-04.
Carnival, permit required, see § 53-03-03.
Cemeteries, regulation, see § 23-06-21.
Contagious diseases, power of quarantine, see §§ 23-07-06, 40-06-01.
Dairy products, regulations, see ch. 4-30.
Dances, regulation, see ch. 53-02.
Drains for city water supply, joint use of under agreement with drain commissioners, see §§ 61-26-01 to 61-26-03.
Explosives, rules and regulations of state fire marshal, see § 18-01-33.
Federal-aid highway construction, participation of municipalities, see §§ 24-04-04 to 24-04-06.
Federal government, authority to contract with, see § 21-06-08.
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, see ch. 19-02.1.
Highways, classification as to weight and load capacity, see § 39-12-01.
Highways, power of township supervisors to improve streets in cities, see § 58-06-01.
Historical society building space, furnished by municipality or political subdivision, see § 11-11-52.
Hospital, temporary establishment for contagious diseases, see § 23-07-13.
Housing authority, see ch. 23-11.
Indebtedness, certificates, see ch. 21-02.
Indebtedness, limitation, see § 21-03-04.
Insurance, municipality may carry on motor vehicles, see § 39-01-08.
Insurance on public buildings, see ch. 26.1-22.
Jails, see ch. 12-44.1.
Joint exercise of governmental powers, see ch. 54-40.
Joint ownership and use of public buildings and grounds, see § 48-04-01.
Land transfers or abandonment of property acquired under section 11-27-08, see § 40-49-23.
Leases, validation of oil and gas leases, see § 1-04-17.
Leasing land for oil and gas development, see §§ 38-09-02 to 38-09-04.
Liquor, retail licensing, see ch. 5-02.
Nuisance, abatement, see ch. 42-02.
“Nuisance” defined, see § 42-01-01.
Parking meters prohibited, see § 39-01-09.
Parking regulations, requirements for signs, see § 39-13-03.
Parks and park districts, see ch. 40-49.
Rendering plant, restrictions on rebuilding and locating, see § 36-07-13.
Revenue bond refinancing law, see ch. 40-36.
Special assessment warrants, refunding, see ch. 40-27.
Speed limitations, powers of local authorities, see § 39-09-03.
Streets, alleys, and public places, opening and vacating, see ch. 40-39.
Sunday business and labor prohibitions, see ch. 12.1-30.
Tax levies and limitations, see ch. 57-15.
Tax levies, excess levies in municipal government, see ch. 57-17.
Traffic accident reports, city may require, see §§ 39-08-09, 39-08-16.
Traffic-control devices and parking signs, erection, see §§ 39-10-04, 39-13-03.
Transient merchants, regulation by municipality, see § 51-04-09.
Weed control, see § 63-01.1-10.1.
Notes to Decisions
- Appellate Review.
- Subdivision 1.
- Subdivision 2.
- Subdivision 4.
- Subdivision 5.
- Subdivision 7.
-
Subdivision 8.
- —Crosswalks.
- —Dumping Place.
- —Eminent Domain.
- —Financing Improvements.
- —Liability for Negligent Management.
- —Motor Vehicle Laws.
- —Obstructions.
- —Parking Meters.
- —Railroad Right-of-Way.
- —Straightening Creek Bed.
- —Strict Construction.
- —Territorial Extent of Powers.
- —Title to Street.
- —Traffic Signals.
- —Use of Streets.
- Subdivision 10.
- Subdivision 12.
- Subdivision 13.
- Subdivision 14.
- Subdivision 16.
- Subdivision 17.
- Subdivision 18.
- Subdivision 21.
- Subdivision 22.
- Subdivision 23.
- Subdivision 25.
- Subdivision 26.
- Subdivision 27.
- Subdivision 29.
- Subdivision 34.
- Subdivision 35.
- Subdivision 36.
- Subdivision 38.
- Subdivision 41.
- Subdivision 44.
- Subdivision 45.
- Subdivision 46.
- Subdivision 47.
- Subdivision 50.
- Subdivision 52.
- Subdivision 55.
- Subdivision 56.
- Subdivision 57.
- Subdivision 59.
- Subdivision 69.
Appellate Review.
Supreme court will not overturn discretionary act by local commission for failure to publish notice and hold a public hearing in accordance with the published notice when that issue was never raised before the commission, which, therefore, was not given an opportunity to correct the error, if any, before rendering a final decision. An issue not raised in an initial proceeding ordinarily may not be raised on appeal. Lynch v. Williston City Comm'n, 460 N.W.2d 136, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 187 (N.D. 1990).
Subdivision 1.
—Codes Incorporated by Reference.
Because the challenged ordinance was self-contained and did not adopt an existing code by reference, the filing requirement of this section did not apply to that ordinance. Buchholz v. City of Oriska, 2000 ND 115, 611 N.W.2d 886, 2000 N.D. LEXIS 123 (N.D. 2000).
—Compliance with State Law.
City ordinance which admits of a measure of compliance that does not satisfy state law must be construed as silent where the statute speaks, so the statute will apply. Klingensmith v. Siegal, 57 N.D. 768, 224 N.W. 680, 1929 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1929).
—Concurrent Jurisdiction.
If the municipality has concurrent jurisdiction with the state to punish an offense, an ordinance punishing the offense is valid, even though there may be a statute under which the offender may also be punished, and a conviction under the one jurisdiction is not a bar to a conviction under the other. City of Fargo v. Glaser, 62 N.D. 673, 244 N.W. 905, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 233 (N.D. 1932).
Where the act is, by its nature, one which constitutes two offenses, one against the state and one against the municipality, the latter may be constitutionally authorized to punish it, even though the act is also an offense under state law. City of Fargo v. Glaser, 62 N.D. 673, 244 N.W. 905, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 233 (N.D. 1932).
—Implied Powers.
When the power is conferred upon the city council to do and perform any act or thing, and the manner of exercising the same is not specifically pointed out, the city council may provide by ordinance the details necessary for the full exercise of the power. Engstad v. Dinnie, 8 N.D. 1, 76 N.W. 292, 1898 N.D. LEXIS 3 (N.D. 1898).
Where the act or matter covered by the ordinance, and by state law, is not essentially criminal in its nature, and is one the regulation of which is generally confined to local government of cities and towns, but is also of a nature to require general legislation, intention that municipality should have power to make more definite regulations will be inferred from language which would not be sufficient were the matter one not relating to corporate duties. City of Fargo v. Glaser, 62 N.D. 673, 244 N.W. 905, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 233 (N.D. 1932).
Cities are agencies of the state and have only the powers expressly conferred upon them by the legislative branch of the government or such as may be necessarily implied from the powers expressly granted. State ex rel. Dreyer v. Brekke, 75 N.D. 468, 28 N.W.2d 598, 1947 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1947); Fradet v. Southwest Fargo, 79 N.D. 799, 59 N.W.2d 871, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 77 (N.D. 1953); Ujka v. Sturdevant, 65 N.W.2d 292, 1954 N.D. LEXIS 88 (N.D. 1954).
—Police Powers.
Ordinances, though penal in character, are not criminal laws. Village of Litchville v. Hanson, 19 N.D. 672, 124 N.W. 1119, 1910 N.D. LEXIS 17 (N.D. 1910).
Ordinances providing for the good order, peace, and morals of the city are police regulations separate and apart from the criminal jurisprudence of the state. State v. Simpson, 78 N.D. 360, 49 N.W.2d 777, 1951 N.D. LEXIS 95 (N.D. 1951), disapproved, Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S. Ct. 1184, 25 L. Ed. 2d 435, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 52 (U.S. 1970).
In passing upon the validity of city ordinances founded on police power granted by state to the municipality, the courts will not declare them invalid unless they are clearly arbitrary, unreasonable, and without relation to public health, safety, morals, or public welfare. SODERFELT v. CITY OF DRAYTON, 79 N.D. 742, 59 N.W.2d 502, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1953); Tayloe v. Wahpeton, 62 N.W.2d 31, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 85 (N.D. 1953).
City shoplifting ordinance, which established a prima facie presumption regarding the concealment of merchandise was authorized under this section, did not attempt to supersede state law, and was not constitutionally repugnant; it did not define an offense differently from that in the state statute, and merely provided a non-mandatory presumption as an evidentiary device for proving the element of intent. City of Dickinson v. Gresz, 450 N.W.2d 216, 1989 N.D. LEXIS 252 (N.D. 1989).
—Resolution or Ordinance.
The object of this subsection is to prevent the council from exercising large grants of authority without specific regulations of the same first having been made by some enactment which has the force of law, and a mere resolution of the council does not suffice to meet this requirement. Engstad v. Dinnie, 8 N.D. 1, 76 N.W. 292, 1898 N.D. LEXIS 3 (N.D. 1898).
When the charter commits the decision of a matter to the council, and is silent as to the mode, neither expressly nor by necessary or clear implication requiring the action of the council to be in the form of an ordinance, the decision of the council may be evidenced by resolution and need not necessarily be by ordinance. Kerlin v. Devils Lake, 25 N.D. 207, 141 N.W. 756, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 119 (N.D. 1913).
—Scope of Statute.
This statute gives the governing body of the municipality the authority to pass ordinances regulating its own local affairs in all matters not prohibited by state law, even if such matters are covered generally by the state law. State v. Simpson, 78 N.D. 360, 49 N.W.2d 777, 1951 N.D. LEXIS 95 (N.D. 1951), disapproved, Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S. Ct. 1184, 25 L. Ed. 2d 435, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 52 (U.S. 1970).
Subdivision 2.
—Finances and Property.
City commission had the power to dispose of “for the use of the city” any lien on, or interest in, real property in which the city had acquired an interest by reason of the misconduct of its treasurer, and also had the power to convert it into money. City of Williston v. Ludowese, 53 N.D. 797, 208 N.W. 82, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 24 (N.D. 1926).
Public moneys are trust funds and payment under a mistake of law in the course of governmental activity may be recovered, but public moneys paid under a mistake of law in the course of an ordinary proprietary or quasi private capacity of the city cannot be thus recovered. Chrysler Light & Power Co. v. Belfield, 58 N.D. 33, 224 N.W. 871, 1929 N.D. LEXIS 178 (N.D. 1929).
Subdivision 4.
—Tax Levy.
The incidental and indirect benefits accruing to the inhabitants of a city from the development of its commercial interests will not sustain the power of taxation. Manning v. City of Devils Lake, 13 N.D. 47, 99 N.W. 51, 65 L.R.A. 187, 112 Am. St. Rep. 652 (1904), decided prior to the enactment of N.D.C.C § 40-60-01 .
Subdivision 5.
—Borrowing Money.
When the power to authorize the issuance of bonds is vested in the voters they cannot delegate such power to the city council. Stern v. City of Fargo, 18 N.D. 289, 122 N.W. 403, 26 L.R.A. (n.s.) 665 (1909), distinguished, Lang v. City of Cavalier, 59 N.D. 75, 228 N.W. 819 (1930) and Schatz v. City Council, 61 N.W.2d 423, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 89 (N.D. 1953).
Proposition of issuing bonds must be submitted to the voters in such a way as not to involve two or more distinct and unrelated questions. Stern v. City of Fargo, 18 N.D. 289, 122 N.W. 403, 26 L.R.A. (n.s.) 665 (1909), distinguished, Lang v. City of Cavalier, 59 N.D. 75, 228 N.W. 819 (1930) and Schatz v. City Council, 61 N.W.2d 423, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 89 (N.D. 1953); Logan v. Bismarck, 49 N.D. 1178, 194 N.W. 908, 1923 N.D. LEXIS 62 (N.D. 1923).
Statutes governing power of municipality to borrow money when necessary must be strictly construed. Green v. Beste, 76 N.W.2d 165, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1956).
Subdivision (2) of this section generally authorizes a municipal governing body to control municipal finances, pay its debts and expenses, contract debts and borrow money, and to control municipal property; subdivision (5) specifically authorizes the borrowing of money by issuing bonds in accordance with title 21. Subdivision 5 does not provide the exclusive method of borrowing money, but specifies one method of exercising the borrowing authority granted in subdivision 2, particularly when general taxing powers are obligated. Haugland v. Bismarck, 429 N.W.2d 449, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 1988).
Subdivision 7.
—Certificates of Indebtedness.
Agents and officers of a municipal corporation cannot bind the corporation by any act which transcends their lawful or legitimate powers, and this rule applies to the issue of negotiable as well as nonnegotiable evidences of debt. Treadway v. Schnauber, 46 N.W. 464, 1 Dakota 236, 1875 Dakota LEXIS 1 (Dakota 1875).
Certificates of indebtedness may be issued by the governing body of the municipality against taxes already levied without a vote of the electors. Tracy v. Barnes County, 69 N.D. 602, 289 N.W. 377, 1939 N.D. LEXIS 191 (N.D. 1939).
A certificate of indebtedness is an agreement on the part of the taxing district to pay a sum on a specified date with interest at a specified rate, payable out of funds derived from delinquent taxes levied for the current year and four previous years. MURRAY v. MUTSCHELKNAUS, 70 N.D. 1, 291 N.W. 118, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 142 (N.D. 1940). See also 71 N.D. 306, 300 N.W. 460.
Subdivision 8.
—Crosswalks.
It was clear that agreements made between city and department of transportation expressly reserved to the department the right to approve traffic signals, signs, markings and all control measures necessary to establish crosswalks; thus, the city could not establish a crosswalk unless the department approved, and the department, not the city, was vested with control over the establishment of a crosswalk. Yassin v. Schroeder, 469 N.W.2d 368, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1991).
—Dumping Place.
A city is under no obligation to provide a dumping place, but when it does so, it is either as a governmental duty and function or as a pure accommodation to the dumpers and the public. Moulton v. Fargo, 39 N.D. 502, 167 N.W. 717, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 150 (N.D. 1917).
—Eminent Domain.
A city is authorized to lay out and open streets and in so doing to exercise the right of eminent domain. City of Lidgerwood v. Michalek, 12 N.D. 348, 97 N.W. 541, 1903 N.D. LEXIS 50 (N.D. 1903).
The city council may extend streets by eminent domain and its determination of the public necessity therefor is conclusive. City of Grafton v. St. Paul M. & M. Ry., 16 N.D. 313, 113 N.W. 598 (1907).
A determination by the governing body of the necessity for a street is sufficient as a basis to condemn property, whether by ordinance or resolution. Village of Reeder v. Hanson, 55 N.D. 331, 213 N.W. 492, 1927 N.D. LEXIS 41 (N.D. 1927).
City has authority to vacate streets, roads, and alleys within the area of a public housing project, as may be necessary in the development thereof, and to convey without charge the interest which it has in the vacated areas. Ferch v. Housing Auth., 79 N.D. 764, 59 N.W.2d 849, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 76 (N.D. 1953).
Easements for a public roadway and for utilities, water, sewer, and cable television were necessary for a valid public use, and thus the taking was proper. City of Medora v. Golberg, 1997 ND 190, 569 N.W.2d 257, 1997 N.D. LEXIS 228 (N.D. 1997).
—Financing Improvements.
Special assessment is not required to pay for the paving of streets contracted for by the city. Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of Fargo, 12 N.D. 360, 96 N.W. 357 (1903), decided prior to the enactment of Session Laws 1905, Chapter 62 (see now N.D.C.C. § 40-22-36).
City council may pay for street grading out of general tax funds without making special assessments. Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Devils Lake, 42 N.D. 445, 173 N.W. 748, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1919).
—Liability for Negligent Management.
Where the duty to keep streets in repair is in terms enjoined upon the corporate authorities, and they are supplied with the means to perform it, the corporation is liable for the results of its negligence in the care and management of its streets without the necessity of an express statute declaring the liability. Larson v. Grand Forks, 19 N.W. 414, 3 Dakota 307, 1884 Dakota LEXIS 5 (Dakota 1884); Ludlow v. Fargo, 3 N.D. 485, 57 N.W. 506, 1893 N.D. LEXIS 44 (N.D. 1893).
—Motor Vehicle Laws.
The powers given to the city by this statute are not limited by later enactments concerning motor vehicles and motor vehicular traffic. State ex rel. Dreyer v. Brekke, 75 N.D. 468, 28 N.W.2d 598, 1947 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1947).
—Obstructions.
Where the owner of the fee adjoining a sidewalk seeks to appropriate a part of the sidewalk and to erect a permanent obstruction thereon, the city has both the power to require a permit and to refuse the appropriation of the street and the limiting of the surface over which the public may travel. Kennedy v. Fargo, 40 N.D. 475, 169 N.W. 424, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1918).
A city may remove a house that has been built so as to encroach upon a street. City of Jamestown v. Miemietz, 95 N.W.2d 897, 1959 N.D. LEXIS 78 (N.D. 1959).
A city may remove island in street and trees growing therein under determination by the governing body that safety and convenience of the public will be served thereby. Dacotah Hotel Co. v. Grand Forks, 111 N.W.2d 513, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 100 (N.D. 1961).
—Parking Meters.
This statute, which gives cities the power to regulate the use of streets, also gives them power to pass an ordinance for parking meters. (Decision prior to enactment of N.D.C.C. § 39-01-09.) State ex rel. Dreyer v. Brekke, 75 N.D. 468, 28 N.W.2d 598, 1947 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1947).
—Railroad Right-of-Way.
Governing body is authorized to pass an ordinance extending a street across a railroad right-of-way. Ashley v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Ry., 37 N.D. 147, 163 N.W. 727, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1917).
—Straightening Creek Bed.
Where creek flowed in a zigzag direction through a city, it was within the control and subject to the municipal power of the city, and a contract to straighten the creek bed and divert its flow was not ultra vires since it was executed to drain, improve, and repair the streets and alleys which the creek intersected. McGuire v. Rapid City, 43 N.W. 706, 6 Dakota 346, 1888 Dakota LEXIS 43 (Dakota 1889).
—Strict Construction.
The statute granting the city the power to pave and otherwise improve the streets must be strictly construed. Green v. Beste, 76 N.W.2d 165, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1956); Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
—Territorial Extent of Powers.
The lawful exercise of city’s corporate powers, for governmental and political purposes, is limited to the boundaries of the city, but in the exercise of other corporate functions the city can expend corporate funds for parks, drains, sewers, and other activities outside the city which affect the health, safety, and convenience of its inhabitants. Manning v. City of Devils Lake, 13 N.D. 47, 99 N.W. 51, 65 L.R.A. 187, 112 Am. St. Rep. 652 (1904), decided prior to the enactment of N.D.C.C § 40-60-01 .
—Title to Street.
The fee in the street to the center thereof belongs to the abutting owner, except as conveyed to the public for street purposes. State v. Ehr, 52 N.D. 946, 204 N.W. 867, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 158 (N.D. 1925).
A municipality cannot be divested of the title to its streets held in trust for the use of the public by adverse possession. City of Jamestown v. Miemietz, 95 N.W.2d 897, 1959 N.D. LEXIS 78 (N.D. 1959).
—Traffic Signals.
A city can control a traffic signal light or establish a pedestrian crosswalk on a state highway only when the director of the department of transportation has delegated, by agreement with the city, his authority over the urban connecting street. Yassin v. Schroeder, 469 N.W.2d 368, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1991).
—Use of Streets.
The city council has authority to regulate the use of bicycles on the sidewalks. Gagnier v. City of Fargo, 11 N.D. 73, 88 N.W. 1030, 95 Am. St. Rep. 705 (1902), decided prior to the adoption of Art. 1, § 16 of the N.D. Const.
The city council has the power to regulate or prevent the use of the streets for telegraph and telephone poles. Donovan v. Allert, 11 N.D. 289, 91 N.W. 441, 58 L.R.A. 775, 95 Am. St. Rep. 720 (1902), decided prior to the adoption of Art. 1, § 16 of the N.D. Const.
Since the use of a street for the moving of houses is extraordinary in nature, although the city permits such use it does not license the house mover to destroy the use of the street for travel or necessary public purposes nor as against the vested rights of telephone company. Northwestern Tel. Exch. Co. v. Anderson, 12 N.D. 585, 98 N.W. 706, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 10 (N.D. 1904).
A city has the power to use and control the use of the entire area of a street for the benefit of the public in accordance with the powers vested in the city by statute. Dacotah Hotel Co. v. Grand Forks, 111 N.W.2d 513, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 100 (N.D. 1961).
Subdivision 10.
—Lighting of Public Places.
A city has the power to provide for lighting of the city, but it cannot exercise such power by contract with another party to erect such a public utility unless and until an ordinance has been passed and approval of the project has been given by the voters. Engstad v. Dinnie, 8 N.D. 1, 76 N.W. 292, 1898 N.D. LEXIS 3 (N.D. 1898).
A city council may contract with an electric company to furnish current to light the city streets and public grounds. Chrysler Light & Power Co. v. Belfield, 58 N.D. 33, 224 N.W. 871, 1929 N.D. LEXIS 178 (N.D. 1929).
Subdivision 12.
—Electric Light Plants.
The legislative assembly may not grant the right to construct and operate an electric plant within any city without requiring its consent. Western Elec. Co. v. Jamestown, 47 N.D. 157, 181 N.W. 363, 1921 N.D. LEXIS 89 (N.D. 1921); Chrysler Light & Power Co. v. Belfield, 58 N.D. 33, 224 N.W. 871, 1929 N.D. LEXIS 178 (N.D. 1929).
Subdivision 13.
—Civil Liability of Property Owner.
At common law, neither the owner nor the occupant of premises, abutting on the sidewalk, was liable for injuries caused by the natural accumulation of snow or ice thereon. Clark v. Stoudt, 73 N.D. 165, 12 N.W.2d 708, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 51 (N.D. 1944).
If the abutting owner discharges water or snow upon the sidewalk or permits it to drip from his roof onto the sidewalk, the owner may be liable in damages to a person who is injured thereby. Clark v. Stoudt, 73 N.D. 165, 12 N.W.2d 708, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 51 (N.D. 1944).
Owners and occupants of property are not liable to a pedestrian for injuries resulting from a fall caused by slipping on snow and ice which, due to natural weather conditions, accumulated on the sidewalk in front of the property, notwithstanding an ordinance penalizing failure to remove such snow and ice. Clark v. Stoudt, 73 N.D. 165, 12 N.W.2d 708, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 51 (N.D. 1944).
—Failure to Comply with Ordinance.
A city ordinance requiring an occupant of property abutting on a street to keep the sidewalk in front of his place free from ice and snow, and providing a penalty for failure to comply with the ordinance, is merely to compel the occupant to assist the city in performing its municipal duty. Clark v. Stoudt, 73 N.D. 165, 12 N.W.2d 708, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 51 (N.D. 1944).
Subdivision 14.
—Rubbish, Disposal of.
The prevention of the scattering of loose papers upon the streets and the burning of them in public places within a city, or even the burning of papers and refuse in the furnaces of buildings, which may result in dense smoke and flying sparks is a matter essentially public in nature and will justify the maintaining of a public dump. Moulton v. Fargo, 39 N.D. 502, 167 N.W. 717, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 150 (N.D. 1917).
Subdivision 16.
—Obstruction of Street.
A permit to move houses on public streets cannot be used to destroy the vested rights of telephone company to erect and maintain poles and wires in such streets. Northwestern Tel. Exch. Co. v. Anderson, 12 N.D. 585, 98 N.W. 706, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 10 (N.D. 1904).
Subdivision 17.
—Sales in Public Places.
A sale of intoxicating liquor upon any public street is bootlegging. State v. Ehr, 52 N.D. 946, 204 N.W. 867, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 158 (N.D. 1925).
Subdivision 18.
—Speed.
The effect of an ordinance under prior law, regulating the speed of railroad trains, cars, and engines within a city’s corporate limits, was to make the streets safer and more convenient to the public. Edwards v. Great N. Ry., 42 N.D. 154, 171 N.W. 873, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 118 (N.D. 1919).
Subdivision 21.
—Railroad Crossings.
Cities having a commission form of government have authority to require railroad companies to keep flagmen at railroad crossings of streets. Edwards v. Great N. Ry., 42 N.D. 154, 171 N.W. 873, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 118 (N.D. 1919).
Subdivision 22.
—Extending Ways over Railroad Property.
The municipality is authorized to pass an ordinance extending a street across a railroad right-of-way. City of Grafton v. St. Paul M. & M. Ry., 16 N.D. 313, 113 N.W. 598 (1907); Ashley v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Ry., 37 N.D. 147, 163 N.W. 727, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1917).
City need not allege or prove the public necessity for street across railroad and the only question to be determined by the court is the necessity for taking of the specific property for such public use. City of Grafton v. St. Paul M. & M. Ry., 16 N.D. 313, 113 N.W. 598 (1907).
Municipalities may proceed to extend streets across railroads under a general power of appropriation. Ashley v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Ry., 37 N.D. 147, 163 N.W. 727, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1917).
Subdivision 23.
—Extending Sewer Service.
Where city is given express authority to furnish water outside of city under certain circumstances, it has, by implication, power to furnish sewer service to such areas outside of city; since furnishing of sewer service within city grants only license to users, power to furnish such service to users outside city is no greater. Where license to out-of-city users was granted in interest of national defense any action of city revoking such license after defense project had been completed would not be arbitrary or unreasonable. Satrom v. Grand Forks, 163 N.W.2d 522, 1968 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1968).
Subdivision 25.
—Plumbing Regulations.
A city ordinance licensing plumbers is not unconstitutional because it requires a licensee to furnish a surety bond. State ex rel. Bismarck v. District Court, 64 N.D. 399, 253 N.W. 744, 1934 N.D. LEXIS 213 (N.D. 1934).
A state, through a city as the state’s agency, has the right to regulate the licensing of plumbers and the business of plumbing in the interests of public health. State ex rel. Bismarck v. District Court, 64 N.D. 399, 253 N.W. 744, 1934 N.D. LEXIS 213 (N.D. 1934).
Installation and servicing of water softeners by persons not holding plumbing license was in violation of municipal ordinance requiring plumbers to be licensed, since under this section “plumbing” includes installation and service of water softeners. Bob Rosen Water Conditioning Co. v. Bismarck, 181 N.W.2d 722, 1970 N.D. LEXIS 151 (N.D. 1970).
Subdivision 26.
—Licensing of Amusements.
City had authority to enact ordinance requiring the licensing of motion picture booths used for viewing sexually explicit films and to establish a licensing fee designed to defray the costs of issuing the license and the reasonable cost of policing the licensed activity. City of Minot v. Central Ave. News, 308 N.W.2d 851, 1981 N.D. LEXIS 340 (N.D. 1981).
Subdivision 27.
—Abuse of Discretion.
Commissioners’ determination that taxicab license should not be granted will not be disturbed by the court unless they acted arbitrarily or unreasonably in so doing. Bryan v. Olson, 68 N.D. 605, 282 N.W. 405, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 150 (N.D. 1938).
—Constitutionality of Ordinance.
A city ordinance licensing and regulating automobiles and taxicabs, if the license fees are not per se excessive, is a regulatory and not a tax measure and does not deny equal protection or due process. Ex parte Bryan, 66 N.D. 241, 264 N.W. 539, 1936 N.D. LEXIS 167 (N.D. 1936).
—Delegation of Authority.
A city may by appropriate ordinance delegate to designated city officials the authority to license taxicabs operating upon city streets under standards which promote public safety and convenience. Ex parte Bryan, 66 N.D. 241, 264 N.W. 539, 1936 N.D. LEXIS 167 (N.D. 1936).
—Liability Insurance.
A municipality, under its police powers to regulate the operation of public service motor vehicles within the city limits, may require a bond, policy of liability insurance, or other security as a condition to the operation of such motor vehicles for hire upon the streets of the municipality. James v. Young, 77 N.D. 451, 43 N.W.2d 692, 1950 N.D. LEXIS 142 (N.D. 1950).
—Private Use of Wagon.
A city has no power to exact a license for the general use of streets from an individual driving a wagon which hauls his own property. CITY OF CASSELTON v. LEE, 54 N.D. 1, 208 N.W. 400, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1926).
Subdivision 29.
—Alcoholic Beverages.
City ordinance requiring applicant for a liquor license to be a resident of the city was valid and not preempted by, nor in conflict with, state liquor licensing laws. In re Retail Liquor License No. 15, 283 N.W.2d 170, 1979 N.D. LEXIS 286 (N.D. 1979).
A liquor license has the qualities of an intangible property right as to third parties, and thus an agreement between mortgagors and mortgagees providing for transfer of liquor license to the party designated by mortgagee upon default was not invalid. Federal Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Morque, 372 N.W.2d 872, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 369 (N.D. 1985).
Where city ordinance specified that city commission should consider several factors when deciding whether to permit transfer of alcohol license, failure to make findings on several factors listed in ordinance was not error. Fargo Beverage Co. v. Fargo, 459 N.W.2d 770, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 156 (N.D. 1990).
A liquor license confers no vested rights which a licensing authority may not revoke or terminate and is subject to changing regulations or even to legislative cancellation. Fargo Beverage Co. v. Fargo, 459 N.W.2d 770, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 156 (N.D. 1990).
In reviewing a municipality’s issuance or denial of a liquor license, supreme court adheres to traditional virtues of judicial restraint and does not act as a super board of review. Lynch v. Williston City Comm'n, 460 N.W.2d 136, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 187 (N.D. 1990).
Judicial review of local commission’s transfer of liquor licenses upon a writ of certiorari is limited to the question of whether the commission exceeded its jurisdiction. Lynch v. Williston City Comm'n, 460 N.W.2d 136, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 187 (N.D. 1990).
Subdivision 34.
—Discretion of Municipality.
What the limits of a fire district shall be is largely a matter of discretion within the municipality. Village of Ashley v. Ashley Lumber Co., 40 N.D. 515, 169 N.W. 87, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1918).
The city building inspector is not required to issue a building permit for construction of bulk oil station within the fireproof building limits of the city. Midland Produce Co. v. Minot, 70 N.D. 256, 294 N.W. 192, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 168 (N.D. 1940).
Injunction against city council will be denied where evidence was conflicting as to whether the building in question had deteriorated to such an extent that it could not be repaired, in the absence of a showing by property owner that the council’s action was an abuse of discretion. SODERFELT v. CITY OF DRAYTON, 79 N.D. 742, 59 N.W.2d 502, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1953).
—New Building.
Repairing or remodeling a wooden building is not the construction of a “new building” as that expression is commonly used, so does not violate city ordinance making it unlawful to construct any wooden building within the fire limits. City of Mayville v. Rosing, 19 N.D. 98, 123 N.W. 393, 1909 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1909).
—Strict Construction of Statute.
Statutory provisions giving municipal corporations power to prescribe fire limits and direct the removal of buildings therein, which may be damaged to a certain extent, should receive a strict construction in favor of the owners of such buildings. Russell v. Fargo, 28 N.D. 300, 148 N.W. 610, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 108 (N.D. 1914).
—Vested Rights.
Where fire limits have been established after a building has been erected, the owner has acquired a vested right of which he cannot be deprived without some lawful reasons. Russell v. Fargo, 28 N.D. 300, 148 N.W. 610, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 108 (N.D. 1914).
Subdivision 35.
—Fire Hazards.
This subdivision clearly authorizes a city ordinance placing collection of refuse and waste matter exclusively in the hands of a licensed garbage collector. Tayloe v. Wahpeton, 62 N.W.2d 31, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 85 (N.D. 1953).
Subdivision 36.
—Approval of Voters.
The question of acquiring waterworks by purchase, lease, or original construction does not have to be submitted to the voters at any general or special election. Logan v. Bismarck, 49 N.D. 1178, 194 N.W. 908, 1923 N.D. LEXIS 62 (N.D. 1923).
—Competitive Bidding.
A municipal contract for the erection of filtration plants and similar buildings need not be let upon competitive bids. Price v. Fargo, 24 N.D. 440, 139 N.W. 1054, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 13 (N.D. 1913).
—Fire Apparatus.
The power to purchase apparatus for extinguishing fires is clearly within the legislative grant of powers to municipal corporations. W. S. Nott Co. v. Sawyer, 35 N.D. 587, 161 N.W. 202, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 4 (N.D. 1917).
—Repair Expense.
A city may sever the connection of a lateral service pipe in a street with the water mains where the abutting owner refuses to pay the expense of repairing a break therein. Jackson v. Ellendale, 4 N.D. 478, 61 N.W. 1030, 1894 N.D. LEXIS 51 (N.D. 1894).
—Waterwork Systems.
Applying the rule of strict construction, subdivision 36 of this section clearly grants to municipal corporations the general authority to maintain a public water system and to fix and regulate the rates, use and sale of water. A city’s determination of which persons or entities will be held liable for water furnished to a particular geographic location is a matter encompassing a manner and means of exercising that general authority. Meyer v. Dickinson, 451 N.W.2d 113, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 27 (N.D. 1990).
City’s determination that a lien for delinquent water bills may be placed upon property receiving water service was a matter encompassing a manner and means of exercising its general authority to set rates and conditions for the sale of water. Meyer v. Dickinson, 451 N.W.2d 113, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 27 (N.D. 1990).
Subdivision 38.
—Storage of Combustible Material.
Building commissioner does not have to issue permit to build bulk oil station within fireproof building limits of city. Midland Produce Co. v. Minot, 70 N.D. 256, 294 N.W. 192, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 168 (N.D. 1940).
Subdivision 41.
—Jails.
This subdivision gives the city the power to establish and maintain a jail, but does not place upon the city the duty to do so. Trinty Hosp. Ass'n v. Minot, 76 N.W.2d 916, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1956).
Where prisoners convicted of violations of city ordinances are accepted by the county jail for a number of years, the use of the jail by the city will be deemed to have been consented to by the county commissioners and the city is deemed to have impliedly contracted to pay for the maintenance of the prisoners. Grand Forks County v. Grand Forks, 123 N.W.2d 42, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1963).
Subdivision 44.
—Nuisances.
The power to have building condemned as a fire hazard is inoperative and void unless the building is, in fact, a nuisance. Russell v. Fargo, 28 N.D. 300, 148 N.W. 610, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 108 (N.D. 1914).
An ordinance which provides that no undertaking establishment shall be established or maintained within those parts of the city occupied mainly for residences is indefinite and uncertain, and, therefore, invalid. Wasem v. Fargo, 49 N.D. 168, 190 N.W. 546, 1922 N.D. LEXIS 34 (N.D. 1922).
Under this subdivision, a city has the power to remove a house built partly in a street in opposition to a city ordinance. City of Jamestown v. Miemietz, 95 N.W.2d 897, 1959 N.D. LEXIS 78 (N.D. 1959).
Subdivision 45.
—Health Regulations.
Municipal ordinances intending to protect the public health, safety, and welfare are founded upon the police power inherent in the state and granted by it to the municipality. Tayloe v. Wahpeton, 62 N.W.2d 31, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 85 (N.D. 1953).
Subdivision 46.
—Cemeteries.
The municipality may maintain and regulate cemeteries outside its corporate boundaries because such power affects the health of its inhabitants. Manning v. City of Devils Lake, 13 N.D. 47, 99 N.W. 51, 65 L.R.A. 187, 112 Am. St. Rep. 652 (1904), decided prior to the enactment of N.D.C.C § 40-60-01.
Subdivision 47.
—Dog Tax.
Municipal corporations may levy a tax on the privilege of keeping dogs, such tax being regarded as a specific assessment or license. Village of Litchville v. Hanson, 19 N.D. 672, 124 N.W. 1119, 1910 N.D. LEXIS 17 (N.D. 1910); City of Dickinson v. Thress, 69 N.D. 748, 290 N.W. 653, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 204 (N.D. 1940).
Subdivision 50.
—Rent of Public Buildings.
Duty to rent public auditorium to all applicants therefor is not mandatory, and it rests in the discretion of the municipality to determine to whom they will rent such building. State ex rel. Herbrandson v. Vesperman, 52 N.D. 641, 204 N.W. 202, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 129 (N.D. 1925).
—Sale-Leaseback-Purchase Transaction.
A three-step sale-leaseback-purchase transaction employed by the city to fund the construction of improvements to its civic center, library and a watermain, with a nonappropriation mechanism to make clear that its general taxing powers were not obligated, was a reasonable exercise of the general powers granted in subdivision (2) of this section and the specific powers granted in subdivisions (50), (Haugland v. Bismarck, 429 N.W.2d 449, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 1988).
Subdivision 52.
—Supply Contracts.
This subdivision does not require that all public contracts be let by competition. Price v. Fargo, 24 N.D. 440, 139 N.W. 1054, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 13 (N.D. 1913).
Subdivision 55.
—Conflict with Township Zoning Ordinance.
City-acquired property located outside the city limits is not automatically exempt from township zoning ordinances; there must be a balancing of the public interests to determine if such exemption should be allowed, with the city having the burden of proof that the balance of interests is on its side. Fargo v. Harwood Township, 256 N.W.2d 694, 1977 N.D. LEXIS 148 (N.D. 1977).
Subdivision 56.
—Option to Purchase Realty.
A city has power to grant an option on the purchase of real property. Dahl v. Grafton, 286 N.W.2d 774, 1979 N.D. LEXIS 322 (N.D. 1979).
—Transfer of Property.
The city commission has the power to dispose of “for the use of the city” any lien, or interest in, real property which the city acquired by reason of the misconduct of its treasurer, and to convert it into money. City of Williston v. Ludowese, 53 N.D. 797, 208 N.W. 82, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 24 (N.D. 1926).
Subdivision 57.
—Franchises.
Where plaintiff claimed it was unconstitutionally deprived of a protected property interest in an exclusive cable franchise, the United States district court found that this subdivision did not permit an exclusive franchise, and if one had been granted, it would probably have violated the other applicants’ free speech rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.International Broadcasting Corp. v. Bismarck, 697 F. Supp. 1094, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14220 (D.N.D. 1987).
—Franchise Time Limit.
City’s agreement to share in cost of construction and use of water main was limited by this subsection; where twenty-year period had expired, pipeline company outside city limits had no right to continue to receive water service; subsection uses word “franchise” and “privilege” interchangeably. Williams Bros. Pipe Line Co. v. Grand Forks, 163 N.W.2d 517, 1968 N.D. LEXIS 90 (N.D. 1968).
Subdivision 59.
—Public Works.
A city can enter into a cooperative agreement with a housing authority on matters which are within the general powers granted the city. Ferch v. Housing Auth., 79 N.D. 764, 59 N.W.2d 849, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 76 (N.D. 1953).
The power vested in municipalities to own and operate electric light and power plants does not derogate the state’s sovereign powers to manage, maintain, and operate its charitable institutions, including powers to purchase light and power, regardless of whether they are located within or without the limits of a municipality. City of Grafton v. Otter Tail Power Co., 86 N.W.2d 197, 1957 N.D. LEXIS 167 (N.D. 1957).
Subdivision 69.
—Employee Pensions.
City’s power to provide compensation for its employees was not governed by N.D.C.C. § 40-05-01(69) because the city was a home rule city and had availed itself of the power to regulate employee compensation and supersede state law under N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-06 by implementing its home rule charter compensation provision by ordinance; section 40-05-01(69) provided that a municipality had the power to consolidate existing pension plans, which the city did when it repealed the prior ordinances providing separate pension plans and enacted a new ordinance for a combined employee pension plan. Klug v. City of Minot, 2011 ND 67, 795 N.W.2d 906, 2011 N.D. LEXIS 68 (N.D. 2011).
Collateral References.
Pawnbrokers and Moneylenders 2.
Municipal Corporations 52-63.
54 Am. Jur. 2d, Moneylenders and Pawnbrokers, § 1 et seq.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 21.
58 C.J.S. Moneylenders, §§ 1-3.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 104-122.
Contributory negligence as defense in action by municipality, 1 A.L.R.2d 827.
Off-street parking facilities, 8 A.L.R.2d 373.
Validity of conditions imposed by municipality to approval of subdivision map or plat, 11 A.L.R.2d 524, 532.
Constitutional rights of owner as against destruction of building by public authorities, 14 A.L.R.2d 73.
Milk to be sold in city, validity of municipal ordinance imposing requirements on outside producers of, 14 A.L.R.2d 103.
Police power of municipal corporation, extension of, beyond territorial limits, 14 A.L.R.2d 103.
Compromise of claim, power of city or its officials as to, 15 A.L.R.2d 1359.
Tourist or trailer camps, motor courts or motels, maintenance and regulation by public authorities, 22 A.L.R.2d 774, 793.
Labor union organization and activities of public employees, 31 A.L.R.2d 1142.
Capacity of municipality as trustee for maintenance or care of private cemetery, burial lot, tomb, or monument, or erection of tomb or monument, 47 A.L.R.2d 596, 622.
Right to compel municipality to extend its water system beyond its territorial limits, 48 A.L.R.2d 1222.
Airport, liability of municipality for torts in connection with, 66 A.L.R.2d 634.
Conflict of laws: right of state or its political subdivision to maintain action in another state for support and maintenance of defendant’s child, parent, or dependent in plaintiff’s institution, 67 A.L.R.2d 771.
Insurance: liability or indemnity insurance carried by governmental unit as affecting immunity from tort liability, 68 A.L.R.2d 1437.
Loop-o-plane, etc.: liability of municipal corporation for injury or death on or near loop-o-plane, ferris wheel, miniature car, or similar ride, 86 A.L.R.2d 350.
Municipal liability for personal injuries resulting from police officer’s use of excessive force in performance of duty, 88 A.L.R.2d 1330.
Personal liability of public officer for killing or injuring animal while carrying out statutory duties with respect to it, 2 A.L.R.3d 822.
Prohibiting or regulating removal or exploitation of oil and gas, minerals, soil, or other natural products within municipal limits, 10 A.L.R.3d 1226.
Validity of vagrancy statutes and ordinances, 25 A.L.R.3d 792.
Power of eminent domain as between state and subdivision or agency thereof, or as between different subdivisions or agencies themselves, 35 A.L.R.3d 1293.
Labor law: Right of public employees to strike or engage in work stoppage, 37 A.L.R.3d 1147.
Validity and construction of municipal ordinances regulating community antenna television service (CATV), 41 A.L.R.3d 384.
Propriety of injunctive relief against diversion of water by municipal corporation or public utility, 42 A.L.R.3d 426.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance providing for repair or destruction of residential building by public authorities at owner’s expense, 43 A.L.R.3d 916.
Power of municipal corporation to limit exclusive use of designated lanes or streets to buses and taxicabs, 43 A.L.R.3d 1394.
Estoppel of municipality as to encroachments upon public streets, 44 A.L.R.3d 257.
Power of municipal corporation to lease or sublet property owned or leased by it, 47 A.L.R.3d 19.
Validity of regulation providing for reserved parking spaces or parking priority on publicly owned property for members of a designated group, 70 A.L.R.3d 1323.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinance proscribing solicitation for purposes of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation — modern cases, 77 A.L.R.3d 519.
Doctrine of apparent authority as applied to agent of municipality, 77 A.L.R.3d 925.
Validity of statutes, ordinances, and regulation requiring the installation or maintenance of various bathroom facilities in dwelling units, 79 A.L.R.3d 716.
Regulation of astrology, clairvoyancy, fortunetelling, and the like, 91 A.L.R.3d 766.
Union security arrangements in state public employment, 95 A.L.R.3d 1102.
Liability for wrongful autopsy, 18 A.L.R.4th 858.
Legal aspects of speed bumps, 60 A.L.R.4th 1249.
Products liability: building and construction lumber, 61 A.L.R.4th 121.
Zoning regulation of intoxicating liquor as pre-empted by state law, 65 A.L.R.4th 555.
Municipal liability for negligent performance of building inspector’s duties, 24 A.L.R.5th 200.
Liability of electric company to one other than employee for injury or death arising from commencement or resumption of service, 46 A.L.R.5th 423.
Validity, construction, and application of loitering statutes and ordinances, 72 A.L.R.5th 1.
Construction and Application of “Municipal Cost Recovery Rule,” or “Free Public Services Doctrine”, 32 A.L.R.6th 261.
Law Reviews.
Municipal Corporation — Legislative Control of Municipal Acts, Rights and Liabilities — Home Rule Cities Lack Authority to Create Random Forms of Government, 57 N.D. L. Rev. 655 (1981).
North Dakota Supreme Court Review (Capital Elec. Coop. v. Bismarck, 2007 ND 128, 736 N.W.2d 788 (2007)), see 84 N.D. L. Rev. 567 (2008).
40-05-01.1. Assessment of costs of work done necessary for the general welfare.
Whenever it becomes necessary for the general welfare, public health, fire protection, or public safety to order an owner or occupant of property to do certain work provided for by ordinance, and such owner or occupant refuses to conduct or comply with such order, the work may be done by the municipality and the owner or occupant of such property billed for the same by the municipality, or whenever a municipality for the general welfare, public health, fire protection, or public safety establishes by ordinance and maintains and operates a garbage and rubbish collection and removal system, the cost of such service may be charged to the owner or occupant of the property served. If such bill is not paid when due, the amount thereof may be assessed against the premises on which such work is done, or for which the service is rendered, and collected and returned in the same manner as other municipal taxes are assessed, certified, collected, and returned. This section shall not be construed to limit or affect in any manner any methods which now or in the future may be used for the collection of costs incurred by the municipality for the purposes set forth in this section, but the remedies provided for herein shall be in addition to such methods.
Source:
S.L. 1949, ch. 270, §§ 1, 2; 1951, ch. 261, § 1; R.C. 1943, 1957 Supp., §§ 40-05011, 40-05012.
Note.
The provisions of former section 40-05-01.2 have been combined with this section.
Notes to Decisions
Fees Charged to Nonuser.
Since an owner’s property is “served” by a municipality’s garbage collection service through receipt of tangible benefits of a uniform system of collection to protect the public health, fees charged a property owner who did not use a city’s collection service were not in excess of the city’s authority and did not violate the property owner’s substantive due process rights. Ennis v. City of Ray, 1999 ND 104, 595 N.W.2d 305, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1999).
40-05-01.2. Remedies additional and not restrictive. [Repealed]
Repealed by omission from this code.
Note.
The provisions of section 40-05-01.2 have been combined with section 40-05-01.1.
40-05-01.3. City traffic ordinances to apply to streets within mobile home parks.
Every city ordinance regulating the operation or equipment of motor vehicles or regulating traffic shall apply to the private ways, streets, lanes, and alleys of mobile home parks, trailer parks, and campgrounds containing five or more lots for occupancy by mobile homes, travel trailers, or tents.
Source:
S.L. 1977, ch. 376, § 2.
40-05-02. Additional powers of city council and board of city commissioners.
The city council in a city operating under the council form of government and the board of city commissioners in a city operating under the commission system of government, in addition to the powers possessed by all municipalities, shall have power:
- Street railway and railway tracks. To permit, regulate, or prohibit the locating, constructing, or laying of railway or street railway tracks in any street, alley, or public place, and any permission given to a street railway may not be for a longer period than fifty years.
- Sale of milk. To license the sale of milk.
- Lumber, wood, coal, hay, and merchandise — Municipal scales. To regulate the inspecting, weighing, and measuring of lumber, firewood, coal, hay, and other articles of merchandise; establish or purchase one or more city scales and to require dealers in hay, coal, firewood, or any other commodity, which, in the judgment of the governing body, should be weighed upon the city scales, to use such scales in the sale of such commodity; and charge a reasonable fee for the use of such scales.
- Fences and party walls. To regulate partition fences and party walls.
- Jail, house of correction, workhouse. To establish, maintain, and regulate a city jail, house of correction, and workhouse for the confinement and reformation of disorderly persons convicted of violating any city ordinance and to appoint necessary jailers and keepers.
- Building permits. To provide by ordinance and to fix the fees for the issuance of building permits.
- Building construction — Fire escapes. To prescribe the manner of constructing buildings, structures, and the walls thereof, require and regulate the construction of fire escapes on buildings, and provide for the inspection of all buildings within the limits of the municipality and for the appointment of a building inspector.
- Bridges, viaducts, tunnels, and overhead pedestrian bridges. To construct, keep in repair, and regulate the use of bridges, viaducts, overhead pedestrian bridges, and tunnels.
- Police. To regulate the police of the municipality and to pass and enforce all necessary police ordinances.
- Hospitals and medical dispensaries. To establish, control, and regulate hospitals and medical dispensaries.
- Census. To provide for the taking of a census of the city, but no city census may be taken more often than once in every three years.
- Redistricting city. To redistrict the city into wards and to prescribe the boundaries thereof.
- Zoning. To adopt a zoning ordinance as provided in this title; regulate the location of junk shops, coalyards, garages, machine shops, power laundries, hospitals, and undertaking establishments; and establish building lines fixing the distance from the property line at which buildings may be erected.
- Traffic regulation. To regulate, control, or restrict within designated zones, or congested traffic districts, except that the speed limit for vehicles on those streets designated as part of any state highway must be as determined by mutual agreement with the director of the department of transportation, the use of streets, alleys, or other public ways by various classes of traffic.
- Driving while intoxicated. To prohibit by ordinance the operation of any motor vehicle or other conveyance upon the streets, alleys, or other public or private areas to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use within the city by any person under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a controlled substance.
- Tourist camps. To license, regulate, and fix the location of any public or private tourist camp within the city.
- Water supply. To withdraw from any stream, watercourse, or body of water within or without a city, or within or without, or bordering upon, this state, a supply of water reasonably sufficient for the needs of the inhabitants of the city, and to supply the facilities for the storage of water for all other necessary municipal purposes.
- Dams for municipal water purposes. To erect dams upon or across streams, watercourses, or bodies of water within or without, or bordering upon, the boundaries of this state, and to improve, alter, or protect the bed, banks, or course thereof.
- Water supply — Acquire necessary property. To acquire by gift, grant, lease, easement, purchase, or, subject to chapter 32-15, by eminent domain, and to own, operate, maintain, and improve, all lands, structures, power plants, public works, and personal property, whether within or without this state, necessary for the maintenance and conservation of its water supply.
- Abandoned or unclaimed personal property. To provide by ordinance for the taking, storage, and disposal of any personal property abandoned or left unclaimed upon the streets, alleys, or other public ways of the city for a period exceeding ten days, and, after holding such property for a period of not less than sixty days, to sell the same at public sale after a notice published or posted at least ten days before the sale, and at such place, and in such manner as may be provided by ordinance. Upon the sale of the property, the city shall convey to the purchaser a merchantable title by a bill of sale. At any time within six months after the sale, the owner of the property, upon written application, is entitled to receive the proceeds of the sale from the city, less the necessary expense of taking, storing, and selling the property. The owner of the property may reclaim it at any time prior to the sale upon payment of the necessary expense of taking and storing.
- Auditoriums and public buildings. To take charge of a fully completed auditorium or other property originally purchased or acquired for public use by public subscription, donation, sale of stock, or otherwise, if such auditorium or other property has been abandoned or lost by the original owner or owners, their successors or assigns, and to operate, maintain, repair, and keep such property for public use. In the ownership, management, use, or operation thereof, the city must be deemed to be exercising a governmental function.
- Dogs. To license dogs, and to regulate the keeping of dogs, including authorization for their disposition or destruction in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public provided, however, that license fees are waived in the case of an assistance dog.
- Substandard buildings or structures. The governing body of any city shall have the authority to provide by ordinance for the demolition, repair, or removal of any building or structure located within the limits of such city or other territory under its jurisdiction, which creates a fire hazard, is dangerous to the safety of the occupants or persons frequenting such premises, or is permitted by the owner to remain in a dilapidated condition. Any such ordinance must provide for written notice to the owner of a hearing by the governing body before final action is taken by such body. It must also provide a reasonable time within which an appeal may be taken by the owner from any final order entered by such governing body to a court of competent jurisdiction. The amount of the cost of any demolition, repair, or removal of a building or structure constitutes a lien against the real property from which the cost was incurred and the lien may be foreclosed in judicial proceedings in the manner provided by law for loans secured by liens on real property. If this amount is not adequate to cover the cost of demolition, repair, or removal, the city has a lien for the amount of the additional costs on all real property owned, or later acquired, by the owner in the city. If the city provides the amount of the lien and the name of the owner, the county auditor shall enter on the tax list the amount of the additional cost as a tax lien. The tax lien is enforceable by the city in the same manner as a tax lien by a county. This subsection in no way limits or restricts any authority which is now or may hereafter be vested in the state fire marshal for the regulation or control of such buildings or structures.
- Assault and battery. To prohibit by ordinance and prescribe the punishment for the commission of assault and battery within the jurisdiction of the city.
- Theft. To prohibit by ordinance and prescribe the punishment for the commission of theft, as defined by chapter 12.1-23, within the jurisdiction of the city.
- Peace bonds. To provide by ordinance for the issuance of peace bonds by the municipal judge in accordance with the procedure in chapter 29-02.
- Public transportation. To provide by ordinance for the purchase, acquisition, or establishment, and operation of a public transportation system. In the alternative, to provide for payments under a contract, approved by the governing body of the city, with a private contractor, for the provision and operation of a public transportation system within the city.
- Traffic violation hearings. To enact an ordinance equivalent to section 39-06.1-04; provided, that the penalty assessed may not exceed that authorized by section 40-05-06.
- Marijuana possession. To prohibit by ordinance any person, except a person operating a motor vehicle, from possessing not more than one ounce [28.35 grams] of marijuana, as defined by section 19-03.1-01, within the jurisdiction of a city, and to prescribe the punishment, provided the penalty assessed is subject to subsection 9 of section 19-03.1-23.
- Establishment of administrative boards. To establish administrative boards or committees for the limited purpose of adjudicating a violation of a noncriminal city ordinance or noncriminal city code. An administrative board or committee may impose fines or other noncriminal penalties, including issuing orders of suspension and revocation of a permit or license. A decision by an administrative board or committee is subject to appeal to the governing body of the municipality.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 22; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 1; 1887, ch. 106, § 1; 1890, ch. 100, §§ 1, 2; R.C. 1895, §§ 2148, 2365; S.L. 1897, ch. 102, § 1; 1897, ch. 148, § 1; 1899, ch. 40, § 1; R.C. 1899, §§ 2148, 2365; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 47; 1905, ch. 186, § 1; R.C. 1905, §§ 2678, 2864; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 48; 1907, ch. 268, § 1; 1911, ch. 77, § 48; 1911, ch. 79, § 1; 1913, ch. 81, § 1; 1913, ch. 291, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3599, 3818, 3861; S.L. 1933, ch. 175, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0502; S.L. 1945, ch. 252, §§ 1, 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-0502; S.L. 1959, ch. 285, § 5; 1967, ch. 324, § 1; 1969, ch. 368, § 1; 1971, ch. 388, § 1; 1975, ch. 106, § 453; 1975, ch. 339, §§ 20, 21; 1981, ch. 408, § 1; 1983, ch. 455, § 1; 1987, ch. 73, § 25; 1987, ch. 490, § 1; 2001, ch. 258, § 7; 2007, ch. 293, § 18; 2009, ch. 347, § 1; 2015, ch. 278, § 1, eff August 1, 2015; 2017, ch. 164, § 12, eff August 1, 2017; 2019, ch. 187, § 8, eff August 1, 2019.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 278, S.L. 2015 became effective August 1, 2015.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 347, S.L. 2009 became effective August 1, 2009.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 18 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007 became effective April 5, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 47 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007.
Cross-References.
Bridges, construction by board of county commissioners, see § 24-08-01.
Bridges, issuance of bonds to meet construction expenses of, see § 24-08-07.
Building permits, inspection of construction requiring, see § 54-21.2-04.
Highways, classification as to weight and load capacities, see § 39-12-01.
Hospital, permission to establish in residence block of city, see § 23-12-04.
Jails, see ch. 12-44.1.
Parking meters prohibited, see § 39-01-09.
Speed limitations, powers of local authorities, see § 39-09-03.
Traffic-control devices and parking signs, erection, see §§ 39-10-04, 39-13-03.
Notes to Decisions
- Subdivision 5.
- Subdivision 6.
- Subdivision 7.
- Subdivision 8.
- Subdivision 10.
- Subdivision 13.
- Subdivision 14.
- Subdivision 15.
- Subdivision 21.
- Subdivision 22.
- Subdivision 23.
Subdivision 5.
—Jail.
This subdivision does not place upon the city the duty to establish and maintain a jail, but merely gives it the power to do so. Trinty Hosp. Ass'n v. Minot, 76 N.W.2d 916, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1956).
Subdivision 6.
—Building Permits.
The construction of an areaway to permit direct access from the sidewalk to a basement is an alteration of the building within the meaning of an ordinance requiring a permit therefor. Kennedy v. Fargo, 40 N.D. 475, 169 N.W. 424, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1918).
Mandamus will not lie to compel members of city council to issue a building permit. Midland Produce Co. v. Minot, 70 N.D. 256, 294 N.W. 192, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 168 (N.D. 1940).
Subdivision 7.
—Fire Escapes.
City ordinances dealing with fire escapes must be consistent with state law. Klingensmith v. Siegal, 57 N.D. 768, 224 N.W. 680, 1929 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1929).
Subdivision 8.
—Bridges.
Bridges may not be built by a municipality outside the corporate limits where the direct purpose of the expenditure is for the benefit of only those who will travel the road, and the businessmen who will profit by their trade. Manning v. City of Devils Lake, 13 N.D. 47, 99 N.W. 51, 65 L.R.A. 187, 112 Am. St. Rep. 652 (1904), decided prior to the enactment of N.D.C.C § 40-60-01.
Subdivision 10.
—Hospitals.
A person affected with smallpox who is removed to a county pesthouse by official order may be held liable for medicine and medical attendance furnished by a physician employed by the county if he accepts such services without objection and receives the benefit thereof. Ostland v. Porter, 25 N.W. 731, 4 Dakota 98, 1885 Dakota LEXIS 13 (Dakota 1885).
Subdivision 13.
—Zoning.
An ordinance which provides that no undertaking establishment shall be established or maintained within those parts of the city occupied mainly for residences is indefinite and uncertain, and, therefore, invalid. Wasem v. Fargo, 49 N.D. 168, 190 N.W. 546, 1922 N.D. LEXIS 34 (N.D. 1922).
The power of a city to establish building lines fixing the distance from the property line at which buildings may be erected carries with it the power to prescribe reasonable regulations concerning side yards. Ujka v. Sturdevant, 65 N.W.2d 292, 1954 N.D. LEXIS 88 (N.D. 1954).
Subdivision 14.
—Crosswalks.
It was clear that agreements made between city and department of transportation expressly reserved to the department the right to approve traffic signals, signs, markings and all control measures necessary to establish crosswalks; thus, the city could not establish a crosswalk unless the department approved, and the department, not the city, was vested with control over the establishment of a crosswalk. Yassin v. Schroeder, 469 N.W.2d 368, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1991).
—Parking Meters.
Municipalities have the right to establish and maintain parking meters in the exercise of their power to regulate the use of the streets. (Decision prior to enactment of section 39-01-09.) State ex rel. Dreyer v. Brekke, 75 N.D. 468, 28 N.W.2d 598, 1947 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1947).
—State Highways in Cities.
Read in conjunction with N.D.C.C. § 24-01-02, which gives the director of the department of transportation complete authority to designate what roads compose the state highway, and N.D.C.C. § 24-01-03, which makes the director responsible for constructing the state highway system, subdivision (14) of this section authorizes cities to regulate by classes of traffic the use of public ways within cities, including those city streets designated as state highways. Ebach v. Ralston, 469 N.W.2d 801, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 81 (N.D. 1991).
Subdivision (14) of this section authorizes a city to regulate the use of state highways by people, animals and vehicles within cities, except that the setting of speed limits requires the consent of the director of the department of transportation. A city’s power does not, however, reach the design or the alteration of the roadway or the use of a traffic signal controlling the state highway, which are within the sole authority of the director. Ebach v. Ralston, 469 N.W.2d 801, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 81 (N.D. 1991).
—Traffic Signals.
A city can control a traffic signal light or establish a pedestrian crosswalk on a state highway only when the director of the department of transportation has delegated, by agreement with the city, his authority over the urban connecting street. Yassin v. Schroeder, 469 N.W.2d 368, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1991).
Subdivision 15.
—Driving While Intoxicated.
A city did not, under prior law, have the power to regulate the operation of motor vehicles on its streets by persons who were intoxicated, such regulation being a matter of state-wide importance. City of Fargo v. Glaser, 62 N.D. 673, 244 N.W. 905 (1932), decided prior to the amendment to this section by Session Laws 1933, ch. 175, distinguished, Espeland v. Police Magistrate's Court, 78 N.D. 349, 49 N.W.2d 394, 1951 N.D. LEXIS 94 (N.D. 1951).
The legislative action in authorizing cities to enact ordinances prohibiting drunken driving on their streets did not repeal S.L. 1927, ch. 162, § 62 (N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01) but simply created an extra hazard for the drunken driver. State v. Colohan, 69 N.D. 316, 286 N.W. 888, 1939 N.D. LEXIS 154 (N.D. 1939).
Subdivision 21.
—City Auditorium.
The board of city commissioners is vested with discretion as to the leasing of a city auditorium. State ex rel. Herbrandson v. Vesperman, 52 N.D. 641, 204 N.W. 202, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 129 (N.D. 1925).
Subdivision 22.
—Dog Tax.
The board of city commissioners has power to provide for the licensing and registration of all dogs kept in a city as well as the authority to prohibit the running at large of dogs. City of Dickinson v. Thress, 69 N.D. 748, 290 N.W. 653, 1940 N.D. LEXIS 204 (N.D. 1940).
Subdivision 23.
—Substandard Buildings.
For case, upholding orders by city that owner demolish separate rental properties because they were substandard, see Pic v. Grafton, 460 N.W.2d 706, 1990 N.D. LEXIS 191 (N.D. 1990).
—Removal of Substandard Structure.
An ordinance which provides for demolition, repair, or removal of buildings which are fire hazards, dangerous to the occupants’ safety, or in a dilapidated condition is valid exercise of police power. SODERFELT v. CITY OF DRAYTON, 79 N.D. 742, 59 N.W.2d 502, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1953); Fradet v. Southwest Fargo, 79 N.D. 799, 59 N.W.2d 871, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 77 (N.D. 1953).
City has the power to order demolition of private buildings if it enacts an appropriate ordinance pursuant to this section. Bergquist v. Eichelberger, 262 N.W.2d 19, 1978 N.D. LEXIS 202 (N.D. 1978).
City council’s order for the removal of buildings because they were considered substandard was arbitrary, oppressive, and unreasonable where there was no evidence upon which to conclude that the buildings were not repairable and the ordinance regarding substandard buildings did not set forth any standards whatsoever whereby the council was to determine whether a structure was to be repaired, demolished, or removed. Pic v. Grafton, 339 N.W.2d 763, 1983 N.D. LEXIS 399 (N.D. 1983).
Collateral References.
Who “harbors” or “keeps” dog under animal liability statute, 64 A.L.R.4th 963.
Construction and effect of statute requiring that zoning application be treated as approved if not acted on within specified period of time, 66 A.L.R.4th 1012.
Horseback riding or operation of horse-drawn vehicle as within drunk driving statute, 71 A.L.R.4th 1129.
Validity and construction of statute, ordinance, or regulation applying to specific dog breeds, such as “pit bulls” or “bull terriers,” 80 A.L.R.4th 70.
Right of one governmental subdivision to sue another such subdivision for damages, 11 A.L.R.5th 630.
40-05-02.1. Parking privileges for handicapped. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 293, § 5.
40-05-02.2. City may levy excise tax on nonprofit liquor dealers by ordinance.
- Any city, through the enactment of an ordinance to such effect, may levy a local excise tax, not in excess of fifty percent, upon the proceeds from gross sales of liquor, as defined by subsection 6 of section 5-01-01, by any nonprofit corporation licensed by the city to sell such liquor; provided, however, that no city may levy the tax herein provided for unless such nonprofit corporation is the only person, firm, association, corporation, or limited liability company within the corporate limits of such city licensed to sell such liquor.
- The city in levying the excise tax provided for in subsection 1 shall provide within the levying enactment a method of computation, collection, and disposition of such tax revenue, and a procedure whereby any person aggrieved by such procedure may appeal to the governing body of the city. The right of appeal from a decision of the governing body of such city to the district court of the district wherein such city is located may not be restricted. An appeal taken under this section must be in accordance with the procedure provided in section 28-34-01.
Source:
S.L. 1963, ch. 289, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 117; 1989, ch. 83, § 14; 1993, ch. 54, § 106.
Collateral References.
Intoxicating Liquors 44-52, 89-95.
45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 201.
40-05-03. Cities having population of fifteen thousand may provide for regulation and inspection of food markets.
The governing body of any city having a population of fifteen thousand or more may enact ordinances providing for the regulation and inspection of food markets, stores, and other places where food intended for human consumption is sold at retail.
Source:
S.L. 1941, ch. 201, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0503; S.L. 1967, ch. 107, § 8.
Cross-References.
General regulation of food, see ch. 19-02.1.
40-05-04. Powers of village. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285.
40-05-05. Cities may contract for electrical energy or gas.
The governing body of any city may enter into a contract with any person, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, or the United States or any department or agency thereof to provide for:
- The furnishing of electrical energy or gas to the inhabitants of the city and to the city for all purposes; or
- The sale to and the purchase by the city for a term of not to exceed ten years, of electrical energy or gas required for city purposes.
The making and execution of any such contract must be authorized by a resolution of the governing body adopted by a majority of the members thereof at a regularly assembled meeting of such body. Nothing contained in this section shall deprive the public service commission of any of its regulatory powers with reference to contract rates.
Source:
S.L. 1929, ch. 173, §§ 2, 3; R.C. 1943, § 40-0505; S.L. 1951, ch. 260, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0505; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 118; 1993, ch. 54, § 106.
Cross-References.
Municipal power agencies, see ch. 40-33.2.
Municipal utilities, see ch. 40-33.
Notes to Decisions
Implied Power to Make Feasibility Study.
General power conferred upon city by this section necessarily includes implied power to engage preliminary engineering services and legal services to explore ultimate feasibility of undertaking including, in particular, legal duty of pubic utility to provide transmission service to city as a common carrier or to furnish electrical energy at wholesale cost to municipality; authorizing expenditures in question from general funds of city were proper exercises of that contractual power. Anderson v. Hankinson, 157 N.W.2d 833, 1968 N.D. LEXIS 105 (N.D. 1968).
40-05-06. City fines and penalties limited.
- Except as provided in subsections 2 and 3, the fine or penalty for the violation of any ordinance, resolution, or regulation of a city may not exceed one thousand five hundred dollars, and the imprisonment may not exceed thirty days for one offense.
- For every violation of a city ordinance that regulates the operation or equipment of a motor vehicle or which regulates traffic, except those ordinances listed in section 39-06.1-05, a fee may be established, by ordinance, which may exceed, by up to one hundred percent, the limit, for an equivalent category of violation, set forth in section 39-06.1-06.
- For every violation of a city ordinance enforcing the requirements of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, section 403 relating to publicly owned treatment works, or prohibiting shoplifting, vandalism, criminal mischief, or malicious mischief, the penalty may not exceed a fine of one thousand five hundred dollars, imprisonment for thirty days, or both such fine and imprisonment.
- This section does not prohibit the use of the sentencing alternatives, other than a fine or imprisonment, provided by section 12.1-32-02 for the violation of a city ordinance, nor does this section limit the use of deferred or suspended sentences under subsections 3 and 4 of section 12.1-32-02.
Source:
S.L. 1877, ch. 73, art. 4, § 1; 1890, ch. 100, §§ 1, 2; R.C. 1895, § 2148, subs. 77; S.L. 1897, ch. 102, § 1, subs. 76; 1899, ch. 40, § 1, subs. 77; R.C. 1899, § 2148, subs. 77; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 47, subs. 78; R.C. 1905, § 2678, subs. 78; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 48, subs. 73; 1911, ch. 77, § 48, subs. 73; C.L. 1913, §§ 3599 subs. 78, 3818 subs. 73; R.C. 1943, § 40-0506; S.L. 1969, ch. 369, § 1; 1973, ch. 301, § 33; 1975, ch. 368, § 1; 1981, ch. 409, § 1; 1989, ch. 158, § 15; 1991, ch. 443, § 1; 1997, ch. 132, § 3; 2013, ch. 301, § 22; 2019, ch. 335, § 1, eff August 1, 2019; 2019, ch. 516, § 2, eff August 1, 2019.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 22 of chapter 301, S.L. 2013 became effective July 1, 2013.
Note.
Section 40-05-06 was amended 2 times by the 2019 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to Section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in Section 2 of Chapter 334, Session Laws 2019, Senate Bill 2304; and Section 1 of Chapter 335, Session Laws 2019, House Bill 1244.
Notes to Decisions
- Alcohol.
- Defining An Offense and Penalty.
- Driving Under the Influence.
- Suspension of Driver's License.
Alcohol.
The regulation of the use and sale of alcohol by a municipality is limited to imposing a penalty equal to a class B misdemeanor. City of Fargo v. Little Brown Jug, 468 N.W.2d 392, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 1991).
In order to harmonize the statutes granting and limiting the power of a municipality with N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05, and to avoid an implicit repeal of that power to regulate the use and sale of alcoholic beverages, the prohibition in N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 against a municipal ordinance superseding state law, does not prevent a municipality from enacting an ordinance with a penalty which differs from the penalty which could be imposed under similar state law when the city has enacted an ordinance authorizing imposition of up to the maximum penalty the city may impose under state law, and the enactment is in an area of law in which the city is authorized to engage in regulation through the enactment of an ordinance. City of Fargo v. Little Brown Jug, 468 N.W.2d 392, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 1991).
Defining An Offense and Penalty.
A city may enact an ordinance which defines an offense in language similar to state law but provides for a lesser penalty than the state law. City of Fargo v. Little Brown Jug, 468 N.W.2d 392, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 1991).
Driving Under the Influence.
A provision of the Fargo Municipal Code that regulated the same offense as N.D.C.C. § 5-02-06, but provided that a violation constituted a class B misdemeanor carrying a penalty of a fine not to exceed $500, or imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both, did not supersede the state statute in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05, although it provided a lesser penalty than that mandated by the state statute. N.D.C.C. § 40-05-01(29) granted municipalities the power to regulate the use and licensure of alcoholic beverages while N.D.C.C. § 40-05-06 limited their ability to impose a penalty greater than a class B misdemeanor; the penalty of a municipal ordinance could differ from the penalty imposed by the state law in those situations in which the municipality authorized imposition of up to the maximum allowable municipal penalty that was lesser than the state law penalty for an equivalent statute. City of Fargo v. Little Brown Jug, 468 N.W.2d 392, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 1991).
Violation of municipal ordinance governing driving under the influence was a petty offense, and thus the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the federal constitution was not applicable. City of Bismarck v. Fettig, 1999 ND 193, 601 N.W.2d 247, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 210 (N.D. 1999).
Suspension of Driver's License.
City had no power to suspend driver’s license of person convicted by municipal authorities of driving a car while under the influence of alcohol. City of Fargo v. Glaser, 62 N.D. 673, 244 N.W. 905 (1932), decided prior to the amendment to NDRC 1943, § 40-0502, by Session Laws 1933, ch. 175.
40-05-07. Village fines and penalties limited — Remission. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285.
40-05-08. Municipal licenses for sale of agricultural products limited — Exception.
No municipality shall impose any license fee or charge against the producer or grower of any agricultural product grown or produced upon lands located in this state nor in any manner limit or restrict the free sale thereof by such grower or producer. This provision, however, shall not restrict the right of any municipality to utilize any power given to it to regulate, as reasonable health measures, the inspection and sale of products intended for human consumption.
Source:
S.L. 1933, ch. 175, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-0508.
40-05-09. Purchase of firefighting equipment — How paid — Limitations.
Upon a declaration by resolution duly passed that an emergency exists and that it is desirable and necessary that firefighting apparatus and equipment be acquired for municipal purposes, the governing body of any municipality may enter into a contract or contracts for the purchase of such property. The purchase price of such property may be payable in annual installments, but all moneys paid annually under any such contract shall be available and shall be paid from the authorized tax levy of the municipality. Under this section, contracts may not be entered into which will create aggregate future obligations of the municipality in an amount in excess of one percent of the value of all taxable property within the municipality and such contracts shall not be in excess of ten thousand dollars.
Source:
S.L. 1931, ch. 193, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0509.
40-05-09.1. Tax levy for fire department stations. [Repealed]
Source:
S.L. 1963, ch. 290, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 119; 1967, ch. 325, § 1; 1983, ch. 593, § 20; 1983, ch. 606, § 39; 2015, ch. 439, § 104, eff for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
Effective Date.
The repeal of this section by section 104 of chapter 439, S.L. 2015 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
40-05-09.2. Contracting for fire protection service.
Any city may contract with a nonprofit corporation for the provision of fire protection and firefighting services if the nonprofit corporation has been in existence and has provided fire protection and firefighting services to the contracting city for a period of not less than twenty years.
The governing body of the city may provide funding from revenues derived from its general fund levy authority for contracted fire protection services and may also expend moneys otherwise available for the provision of such service.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 321, § 1; 1983, ch. 593, § 21; 1983, ch. 606, § 40; 2015, ch. 439, § 36, eff for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 36 of chapter 439, S.L. 2015 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
40-05-10. Municipalities to have powers of townships.
In addition to the powers conferred by this title, each incorporated municipality shall have and shall exercise, within its limits and in the manner prescribed by law, the same powers as are conferred upon townships by the laws of this state.
Source:
S.L. 1883, ch. 112, § 121, subs. 1; R.C. 1895, § 2676; R.C. 1899, § 2676; R.C. 1905, § 3216; C.L. 1913, § 4272; R.C. 1943, § 40-0510.
Cross-References.
Powers of townships, see ch. 58-03.
40-05-11. Foreign city — Power to acquire by right of eminent domain, purchase, lease, own, and hold real estate in this state — Liability.
Any city of another state situated within five miles [8.05 kilometers] of the boundary line of this state may purchase, lease, own, and hold real estate in this state for waterworks or sewerage purposes and may improve the land for municipal purposes in the same manner as a city situated in this state, and may lease, let, or convey the land. Any city so situated may acquire, by purchase, gift, devise, or, subject to chapter 32-15, condemnation, any property, corporeal or incorporeal within this state, as may be necessary or convenient for the construction and maintenance of an electric power transmission line, which electric power transmission line has the function of connecting a municipal power plant, owned and operated by that city, with distribution facilities owned by the government of the United States for distributing electric power generated at Garrison Dam. Such foreign city is liable for all damages growing out of or incident to the ownership, use, or occupation of any such real estate in this state as if it were a municipality of this state.
Source:
S.L. 1917, ch. 77, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3770a1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0511; S.L. 1955, ch. 260, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0511; 2007, ch. 293, § 19.
Effective Date.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 19 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007 became effective April 5, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 47 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007.
40-05-12. Foreign city — Power to sue and defend in courts of this state.
Any city of another state authorized by section 40-05-11 to own, lease, occupy, or hold real estate in this state shall have the same right as a city of this state to sue by its corporate authorities and in its corporate name in the courts of this state for the protection of any rights acquired in real estate in this state and to defend actions in its corporate name relating to the ownership, use, or occupation of real estate acquired.
Source:
S.L. 1917, ch. 77, § 2; 1925 Supp., § 3770a2; R.C. 1943, § 40-0512.
40-05-13. Foreign city — Power to convey realty — Regulations governing.
Any real estate in this state owned by a city situated in another state may be conveyed by a warranty or quitclaim deed executed by and on behalf of such city in its corporate name by its executive officer and city auditor. The deed, when so executed and when acknowledged by the executive officer and city auditor for and on behalf of the city, before an officer competent to take acknowledgments, shall be entitled to record.
Source:
S.L. 1917, ch. 77, § 3; 1925 Supp., § 3770a3; R.C. 1943, § 40-0513; S.L. 1973, ch. 80, § 11.
40-05-14. Agreements for construction and maintenance of streets between municipalities and counties.
The governing body of any municipality of ten thousand population or less and the boards of county commissioners of the several counties may enter into agreements for the construction and maintenance of streets within such municipalities by the boards of county commissioners. Said municipalities shall pay, on a reimbursable basis, such sums as are agreed upon.
Source:
S.L. 1953, ch. 253, § 1; R.C. 1943, 1957 Supp., § 40-0514.
40-05-15. Unclaimed motor vehicles — When sale permitted — Bill of sale evidence of title. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1973, ch. 319, § 15.
40-05-16. Programs and activities for senior citizens — Expenditure of funds.
The governing body of any city is authorized to establish or maintain programs and activities for senior citizens, including the expansion of existing senior citizen centers which will provide recreational and other leisure-time activities, informational, health, welfare, counseling, and referral services for senior citizens, and assist such persons in providing volunteer community or civic services. The governing body is authorized to expend funds received from state, federal, or private sources for the public purposes provided for in this section. No expenditure authorized by this section shall be made to defray any expenses of any organization or agency until such organization or agency is incorporated under the laws of this state as a nonprofit corporation and has contracted with the governing body in regard to the manner in which such funds will be expended and the services to be provided. An organization or agency and its program which receives such funds shall be reviewed or approved annually by the governing body to determine its eligibility to receive funds under the provisions of this section.
Source:
S.L. 1975, ch. 96, § 2.
Cross-References.
State matching funds for senior citizens’ programs, see § 57-15-56.
40-05-17. City restriction of adult establishments — Definitions.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Adult bookstore” means a bookstore having as a preponderance of its publications, books, magazines, and other periodicals which are distinguished or characterized by their emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas as defined in this subsection.
- “Adult establishment” means either an adult bookstore, an adult motion picture theater, an adult mini-motion picture theater, or a massage business, all as defined in this subsection.
- “Adult mini-motion picture theater” means an enclosed building with a capacity for less than fifty persons used for presenting motion pictures, a preponderance of which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas as defined in this subsection, for observation by patrons of the theater.
- “Adult motion picture theater” means an enclosed building with a capacity of fifty or more persons used for presenting motion pictures, a preponderance of which are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas as defined in this subsection, for observation by patrons of the theater.
- “Massage” means the manipulation of body muscle or tissue by rubbing, stroking, kneading, or tapping, by hand or mechanical device.
- “Massage business” means any establishment or business wherein massage is practiced, including establishments commonly known as health clubs, physical culture studios, massage studios, or massage parlors.
- “Sexually oriented devices” means without limitation any artificial or simulated specified anatomical area or any other device or paraphernalia that is designed in whole or in part for specified sexual activities.
-
“Specified anatomical areas” means:
- Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals and pubic regions, buttocks, or female breasts below a point immediately above the top of the areola.
- Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered.
-
“Specified sexual activities” means:
- Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal;
- Acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse, or sodomy; or
- Fondling or other erotic touchings of human genitals and pubic regions, buttocks, or female breasts.
-
A determination of preponderance need not be based on whether or not a numerical majority or plurality of the materials are distinguished or characterized by their emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. When making a determination as to whether an establishment displays, sells, distributes, or exhibits a preponderance of materials which are so distinguished or characterized, the governing body or factfinder shall consider the totality of the circumstances and may consider, among other factors deemed relevant, any of the following:
- Dominant theme of the establishment.
- Total impression of the emphasis placed on such materials by the establishment.
- Externalities of the establishment including, the manner of packaging or display and advertising which demonstrates the dominant theme or emphasis being placed on such materials by the establishment.
- Obtrusive characteristics of the materials which tend to distract from and dominate the other classes of materials.
- Manner of display of the materials.
- Advertising emphasis.
- Whether the establishment prohibits minors from entering the premises or any portion thereof.
-
The governing body of any city may, by ordinance, provide that:
- No building, premises, structure, or other facility that contains any adult establishment, as defined in subsection 1, shall contain any other kind of adult establishment.
- No building, premises, structure, or other facility in which sexually oriented devices, as defined in subsection 1, are sold, distributed, exhibited, or contained shall contain any adult establishment, as defined in subsection 1.
Source:
S.L. 1981, ch. 143, §§ 1, 3; 1983, ch. 456, § 1.
Cross-References.
Obscenity control, see ch. 12.1-27.1.
Notes to Decisions
Permissive, Not Mandatory Statute.
With the exception of “the totality of the circumstances”, which the governing body or factfinder shall consider, this statute is permissive, not mandatory, in nature. The statute provides that “the governing body or factfinder … may consider” any of the eight factors listed. Thus, consideration of the eight listed factors is discretionary. City of Mandan v. Mi-Jon News, 381 N.W.2d 540, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 251 (N.D. 1986).
Retroactivity.
The North Dakota legislature did not expressly declare this section to be retroactive. City of Mandan v. Mi-Jon News, 381 N.W.2d 540, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 251 (N.D. 1986).
Collateral References.
Validity and construction of statute or ordinances forbidding treatment in health clubs or massage salons by persons of the opposite sex, 51 A.L.R.3d 936.
Massage parlor as nuisance, 80 A.L.R.3d 1020.
Validity of statutes or ordinances requiring sex-oriented businesses to obtain operating licenses, 8 A.L.R.4th 130.
Validity of ordinances restricting location of “adult entertainment” or sex-oriented businesses, 10 A.L.R.5th 538.
40-05-18. Garbage removal — Number of contractors allowed.
In any city with a population of not less than five thousand persons, the governing body shall, if permitted by ordinance or by law to allow more than one person or firm to contract with commercial enterprises for the private collection or removal of garbage, allow all persons or firms wishing to do so to enter into private garbage removal contracts with commercial enterprises.
Source:
S.L. 1981, ch. 410, § 1.
40-05-19. City funding for animal shelters — Sterilization of animals.
The governing body of the city may provide funding from revenues derived from its general fund levy authority for the construction, operation, or maintenance of animal shelters. Voter-approved levy authority authorized by electors of a city under this section before January 1, 2015, remains in effect through taxable year 2024 or for the time period authorized by the electors, whichever expires first.
The levy authorized by this section may be used to defray expenses of any organization or agency incorporated under the laws of this state as a nonprofit corporation that has contracted with the governing body of the city in regard to the manner in which the funds will be expended and the services will be provided. No unclaimed dog or cat may be released for adoption by an animal shelter that receives funds from the levy under this section without being first sterilized, or without a written agreement and deposit from the adopter guaranteeing that the animal will be sterilized.
Source:
S.L. 1985, ch. 616, §§ 2, 3; 2015, ch. 439, § 37, eff for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 37 of chapter 439, S.L. 2015 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
Collateral References.
Cat as object of larceny, 55 A.L.R.4th 1080.
40-05-20. Programs and activities for handicapped persons — Expenditure of funds.
The governing body of any city or park district may establish or maintain programs and activities for handicapped persons, including recreational and other leisure-time activities and informational, health, welfare, transportation, counseling, and referral services. The governing body may provide funding from revenues derived from its general fund levy authority and may expend funds received from state, federal, or private sources for the public purposes provided for in this section. No expenditure may be made to defray any expenses of any organization or agency until the organization or agency is incorporated under the laws of this state as a nonprofit corporation and has contracted with the governing body in regard to the manner in which the funds will be expended and the services will be provided. An organization or agency that receives the funds must be reviewed or approved annually by the governing body to determine its eligibility to receive funds under this section.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 149, § 2; 2015, ch. 439, § 38, eff for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 38 of chapter 439, S.L. 2015 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
40-05-21. Centennial coordinating committee. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 2011, ch. 54, § 15.
Effective Date.
The repeal of this section by section 15 of chapter 54, S.L. 2011 became effective August 1, 2011.
40-05-22. Golf carts on city streets.
The governing body of a city may allow by an ordinance the operation of golf carts on the city streets. The ordinance may not allow a golf cart on federal, state, or county highways in the city, except for the perpendicular crossing of these highways. The ordinance may not allow the operation of a golf cart on city streets except for daytime travel between the owner’s place of residence and a golf course. Golf carts that are allowed to operate on the city streets as the result of an ordinance are exempt from the title, registration, and equipment provisions of title 39.
Source:
S.L. 2007, ch. 349, § 1.
Effective Date.
This section became effective August 1, 2007.
40-05-23. Limitation on authority — Seed.
Notwithstanding any other law, a city may not impose any requirements or restrictions pertaining to the registration, labeling, distribution, sale, handling, use, application, transportation, or disposal of seed. This section does not apply to city zoning ordinances.
Source:
S.L. 2011, ch. 69, § 7.
Effective Date.
This section became effective July 1, 2011.
40-05-24. Duties of cities granting property tax incentives.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, before granting a property tax incentive on any parcel of property that is anticipated to receive a property tax incentive for more than five years, the governing body of a city shall send the chairman of each county commission and the president of each school district affected by the property tax incentive a letter, by certified mail, which provides notice of the terms of the proposed property tax incentive.
- Within thirty days from receipt of the letter, each affected county and school district shall notify the city, in writing, whether the county or school district elects to participate in granting the tax incentive on the county or school district portion of tax levied on the property. The notification from a county or school district electing not to participate must include a letter explaining any reason for which the entity elected not to participate and whether the county or school district is willing to negotiate the terms of the property tax incentive with the city.
- If the city does not receive a response from an affected county or school district within thirty days of delivery of the letter, the county and school district must be treated as participating in the property tax incentive.
- The term “negotiation” as used in this section means the governing body of an affected county or school district may negotiate the terms of participating in the tax incentive, including the duration of the tax incentive and the taxable value selected for the base year for purposes of computing tax increments.
- If an agreement is reached through negotiation under this section, the property tax incentive must be applied in accordance with the agreement.
- Property subject to a development agreement entered pursuant to section 40-58-20.1 before August 1, 2017, and all amendments to the development agreement, is not subject to the requirements under this section.
Source:
S.L. 2017, ch. 277, § 1, eff August 1, 2017; S.L. 2017, ch. 14, § 22, eff for property tax incentives approved after July 31, 2017.
Note.
Section 40-05-24 was amended 2 times by the 2017 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to Section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in Section 22 of Chapter 14, Session Laws 2017, House Bill 1015; and Section 1 of Chapter 277, Session Laws 2017, Senate Bill 2166.
Section 8 of chapter 14, S.L. 2017 provides, “ EFFECTIVE DATE. Sections 1 through 4 of this Act are effective for property tax incentives approved after July 31, 2017.”
CHAPTER 40-05.1 Home Rule in Cities
40-05.1-00.1. Definitions.
In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:
- “City officers” means the elected and appointed officers of the city and includes the governing body of the city and its members.
- “Executive officer” means the chief officer in whom resides the power to execute the laws of the city.
- “Governing body” means the body which performs the legislative functions of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1985, ch. 455, § 1.
40-05.1-01. Enabling clause.
Any city may frame, adopt, amend, or repeal home rule charters as provided in this chapter.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 1; 1993, ch. 401, § 32.
Notes to Decisions
Definitions.
The definitions in N.D.C.C. § 40-01-01 apply to this chapter. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
City Powers.
While a home rule city can have broad powers over its property and to control its finances and fiscal affairs, if those powers are included in the charter and implemented through ordinances, the powers of a city which has not done so are those bestowed by the legislature on all municipalities. Haugland v. Bismarck, 429 N.W.2d 449, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 1988).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 65.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 107-123.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 122, 143, 180-183, 194, 195.
Law Reviews.
The Legislative/Administrative Dichotomy and the Use of the Initiative and Referendum in a North Dakota Home Rule City, 51 N.D. L. Rev. 855 (1975).
40-05.1-02. Methods of proposing home rule charter.
The governing body of any city may on its own motion cause a home rule charter to be framed and submitted for adoption to the qualified electors of the city in the manner provided in this chapter, or such proposal may be made in a petition filed with the governing body and signed by not less than fifteen percent of the qualified electors of the city voting in the last city election.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 2; 1985, ch. 235, § 70.
40-05.1-03. Charter commission — Membership — Preparation and submission of charter — Compensation and expenses — Publication or distribution.
Within sixty days after proceedings have been initiated for a home rule charter, the governing body of the city shall appoint a charter commission, composed of at least five members, to frame the charter, unless a petition proposing a charter pursuant to section 40-05.1-02 prescribes the composition of the commission or the manner by which the composition of the commission is to be determined. The chairman of the charter commission shall be designated by the governing body and shall be a charter commission member. Compensation and expenses of commission members shall be as determined by the governing body. The governing body may furnish the charter commission with office space, clerical help, legal and other assistance, and supplies, and may appropriate and pay for same out of its general funds. The charter commission shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed charter, and may use other suitable means to disseminate information, receive suggestions and comments, and encourage public discussion of the proposed charter. The commission shall prepare and submit the charter within one year after appointment, unless the governing body allows additional time for submission of the charter. The proposed charter shall then be published once in the city’s official newspaper as provided in section 40-01-09. However, cities with a population of one thousand or less may, in lieu of publishing the charter in a newspaper, distribute copies of the charter door-to-door and have them posted and available at prominent locations in the city. In the event a city does not publish the charter in a newspaper, it must still publish a notice of the election.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 3; 1973, ch. 322, § 1; 1977, ch. 375, § 4; 1993, ch. 401, § 33.
40-05.1-04. Submission of charter to electors.
At least sixty days, but no more than two years, after submission of the charter to the governing body of the city, the proposed charter must be submitted to a vote of the qualified electors of the city at a regular or special city election, or at any statewide election that is held within that time, or at a special city election held concurrently with any statewide election. If the proposed charter has been submitted to a vote of the qualified electors of the city, the governing body of the city may call a special election to resubmit the proposed charter to a vote of the qualified electors of the city, and the special election must take place at least sixty days after the call for the special election. The governing body may amend the proposed charter prior to its resubmission to the electors.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 4; 1973, ch. 322, § 2; 1991, ch. 442, § 4; 1993, ch. 401, §§ 34, 35.
40-05.1-05. Ratification by majority vote — Supersession of existing charter and state laws in conflict therewith — Filing of copies of new charter.
If a majority of the qualified voters voting on the charter at the election vote in favor of the home rule charter, the charter is ratified and is the organic law of the city, and extends to all its local and city matters. The charter and the ordinances made pursuant to the charter in such matters supersede within the territorial limits and other jurisdiction of the city any law of the state in conflict with the charter and ordinances and must be liberally construed for such purposes. One copy of the charter ratified and approved must be filed with the secretary of state and one with the auditor of the city to remain as a part of its permanent records. Thereupon the courts shall take judicial notice of the new charter.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 5; 1999, ch. 278, § 66; 1999, ch. 363, § 1; 2001, ch. 120, § 1; 2001, ch. 358, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
- Criminal or Noncriminal Offenses.
- Powers of Municipalities.
- Superseding Legislation.
- Supersession Provision.
Criminal or Noncriminal Offenses.
N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 precluded the City of Fargo, North Dakota, a home rule city, from imposing fees for noncriminal traffic offenses that exceeded the limits set forth for equivalent violations in N.D.C.C. § 39-06.1-06, because N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 clearly and unambiguously precludes a home rule city from superseding criminal or noncriminal offenses defined by State law, when a penalty that exceeds the limits delineated by equivalent State law supersedes State law; the word “offense” rather than the word “crimes” is used in the text of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05, and an “offense” under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 includes noncriminal, as well as criminal offenses. Sauby v. City of Fargo, 2008 ND 60, 747 N.W.2d 65, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 60 (N.D. 2008).
Powers of Municipalities.
Imposition of a fine for violation of municipal ordinances was reversed and remanded for entry of an order vacating the decision because the Fargo Administrative Enforcement Board had no statutory authority to adjudicate the owner’s alleged violations of the municipal ordinances and its decision was void, when there was no authority for the creation of an administrative system for adjudication of alleged violations of ordinances or regulations enacted by the municipality as an alternative to municipal court and the responsibilities granted to the Board conflicted with N.D.C.C. § 40-18-01(1). City of Fargo v. Malme, 2007 ND 137, 737 N.W.2d 390, 2007 N.D. LEXIS 141 (N.D. 2007).
Because Minot Code of Ordinances § 2-71 and N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 did not conflict and the language for supersession in N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-05 did not apply, the city retained the power applicable to all municipalities under N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 to appoint assistant city attorneys and the city had the statutory authority and power to contract with a county under N.D.C.C. §§ 54-40.3-01 and 40-18-15.1 for municipal prosecution services. City of Minot v. Rudolph, 2008 ND 231, 758 N.W.2d 731, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 201 (N.D. 2008).
Superseding Legislation.
Home rule city’s ordinance authorizing creation of pedestrian mall superseded contradictions in state legislation. City of Fargo v. Fahrlander, 199 N.W.2d 30, 1972 N.D. LEXIS 155 (N.D. 1972).
Supersession Provision.
The supersession provision in this section has limited and qualified application and does not provide that any and every ordinance a city may pass supersedes any state law in conflict therewith; supersession provision applies only to those powers set out in N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-06, provided they are also included in the charter and implemented by ordinance. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
To permit a conclusion that an ordinance supersedes a state law, providing the charter and implementing ordinance requirements have been met, it is not only essential that the power given to the city by the legislature is clearly expressed or necessarily implied from the grant but also that it conflicts with the laws generally applicable to cities. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
40-05.1-05.1. Multicity home rule.
- Two or more cities may draft and submit for adoption a multicity home rule charter to the electors of each city pursuant to this section. The other provisions of this chapter apply to a multicity home rule charter, except as otherwise provided by this section.
-
The process for drafting and submitting a multicity home rule charter may be initiated by:
- Separate motions by the governing bodies of the participating cities;
- The execution of a joint powers agreement between participating cities; or
- A petition filed with each governing body of two or more cities and signed by ten percent or more of the total number of qualified electors of each city voting for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election.
- Within sixty days after proceedings are initiated for a multicity home rule charter, the boards of governing bodies shall enter into a joint powers agreement specifying the procedure for framing the charter, which may include the establishment of a single cooperative charter commission with membership representing each city. As an alternative, the governing bodies in each affected city may establish a separate charter commission pursuant to section 40-05.1-03 to frame the charter in cooperative study with the charter commission of any other affected city. The charter commissions must submit a single joint report and proposed charter.
-
The charter commission, during its deliberation, may hold public hearings and community forums and use other suitable means to disseminate information, receive suggestions and comments, and encourage public discussion on the subject of the proposed multicity home rule charter, and may report periodically to the affected governing bodies on their progress. In preparing the charter, the charter commission may:
- Include any of the available powers enumerated in section 40-05.1-06;
- Provide for adjustment of existing bonded indebtedness and other obligations in a manner which will provide for a fair and equitable burden of taxation for debt service;
- Provide for the transfer or other disposition of property and other rights, claims, assets, and franchises of the cities;
- Provide for the reorganization, abolition, or adjustment of boundaries of any existing boards, commissions, agencies, and special districts of the city governments, including city park districts;
- Include provisions for transition in implementing the charter, including elements that consider the reasonable expectations of current officeholders or personnel such as delayed effective dates for implementation at the end of a current term or a future term, upon the occurrence of a vacancy, or on a date certain;
- Include provision for the limited application or temporary implementation of the charter, including provisions that permit implementation on an experimental or pilot basis such as the expiration of the charter on a date certain in the future, required reapproval of the charter by the electors at a future date, or a phased-in implementation of various aspects of the charter; and
- Include other provisions that the charter commission elects to include and which are consistent with state law.
- The proposed charter or accurate summary of the charter must be published in the official newspaper of each affected city, at the expense of each city, at least once during two different weeks within the thirty-day period immediately preceding the date of election. However, a city with a population of one thousand or less may, instead of publishing the charter in a newspaper, distribute copies of the charter door-to-door and have them posted and available at prominent locations in the city.
- If a majority of the qualified electors voting in each city on the charter vote in favor of the multicity home rule charter, it is ratified and becomes the organic law of the cities on the first day of January following the election or other effective date specified in the charter.
- The amendment or repeal of a multicity home rule charter may proceed pursuant to the amendment and repeal provisions of section 40-05.1-07 on a multicity basis. A majority vote of the qualified electors voting in each city in the election is required to adopt any amendment of a multicity charter. A majority vote of the qualified electors of only one or more participating cities is required to repeal a multicity charter.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 31.
40-05.1-06. Powers.
From and after the filing with the secretary of state of a charter framed and approved in reasonable conformity with the provisions of this chapter, such city, and the citizens thereof, shall, if included in the charter and implemented through ordinances, have the following powers set out in this chapter:
- To acquire, hold, operate, and dispose of property within or without the corporate limits, and, subject to chapter 32-15, exercise the right of eminent domain for such purposes.
- To control its finances and fiscal affairs; to appropriate money for its purposes, and make payment of its debts and expenses; to contract debts, borrow money, issue bonds, warrants, and other evidences of indebtedness; to establish charges for any city or other services; and to establish debt limitations.
- To levy and collect property taxes and special assessments for benefits conferred, for its public and proprietary functions, activities, operations, undertakings, and improvements, and establish mill levy limitations. Notwithstanding any authority granted under this chapter, all property must be assessed in a uniform manner as prescribed by the state board of equalization and the state supervisor of assessments and all taxable property must be taxed by the city at the same rate unless otherwise provided by law.
-
To levy and collect an infrastructure fee. The fee must replace a general special assessment on all property for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs through a utility bill issued by a municipality. The money collected under this subsection may not be used for any purpose other than infrastructure maintenance costs. If a home rule city levies an infrastructure fee, the home rule city also may levy and collect green field special assessments. As used in this subsection:
- “General special assessments” means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
- “Green field special assessments” means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
-
To levy and collect excises, fees, charges, franchise and license taxes, sales and use taxes, farm machinery gross receipts taxes, alcoholic beverage gross receipts taxes, a city lodging tax, and a city restaurant tax. For purposes of this section, any taxes imposed under this section on farm machinery, farm irrigation equipment, and farm machinery repair parts used exclusively for agricultural purposes, or on alcoholic beverages, which were in effect on December 31, 2005, become gross receipts taxes after December 31, 2005. After December 31, 2005, any portion of a charter or any portion of an ordinance passed pursuant to a charter which does not conform to the requirements of this section is invalid to the extent it does not conform. The invalidity of a portion of a charter or ordinance because it does not conform with this subsection does not affect the validity of any other portion of the charter or ordinance of the eligibility for a refund under section 57-01-02.1. Ordinances enacted after August 1, 2017, may not allow for the collection and levy of any tax not otherwise specified under this section. Sales and use taxes and gross receipts taxes levied under this section:
- Must conform in all respects with regard to the taxable or exempt status of items under chapters 57-39.2, 57-39.5, 57-39.6, and 57-40.2 and may not be imposed at multiple rates with the exception of sales of manufactured homes or mobile homes.
- May not be newly imposed or changed except to be effective on the first day of a calendar quarterly period after a minimum of ninety days’ notice to the tax commissioner or, for purchases from printed catalogs, on the first day of a calendar quarter after a minimum of one hundred twenty days’ notice to the seller.
- May not be limited to apply to less than the full value of the transaction or item as determined for state sales and use tax purposes, except for farm machinery gross receipts tax.
- Must be subject to collection by the tax commissioner under an agreement under section 57-01-02.1, with the exception of a city lodging or city restaurant tax, and must be administered by the tax commissioner in accordance with the relevant provisions of chapter 57-39.2, including reporting and paying requirements, correction of errors, payment of refunds, and application of penalty and interest.
- To fix the fees, number, terms, conditions, duration, and manner of issuing and revoking licenses in the exercise of its governmental police powers.
- To provide for city officers, agencies, and employees, their selection, terms, powers, duties, qualifications, and compensation. To provide for change, selection, or creation of its form and structure of government, including its governing body, executive officer, and city officers.
- To provide for city courts, their jurisdiction and powers over ordinance violations, duties, administration, and the selection, qualifications, and compensation of their officers; however, the right of appeal from judgment of such courts shall not be in any way affected.
- To provide for all matters pertaining to city elections, except as to qualifications of electors.
- To provide for the adoption, amendment, and repeal of ordinances, resolutions, and regulations to carry out its governmental and proprietary powers and to provide for public health, safety, morals, and welfare, and penalties for a violation thereof.
- To lay out or vacate streets, alleys, and public grounds, and to provide for the use, operation, and regulation thereof.
- To define offenses against private persons and property and the public health, safety, morals, and welfare, and provide penalties for violations thereof.
- To engage in any utility, business, or enterprise permitted by the constitution or not prohibited by statute or to grant and regulate franchises therefor to a private person, firm, corporation, or limited liability company.
- To provide for zoning, planning, and subdivision of public or private property within the city limits. To provide for such zoning, planning, and subdivision of public or private property outside the city limits as may be permitted by state law.
- To exercise in the conduct of its affairs all powers usually exercised by a corporation.
- To fix the boundary limits of said city and the annexation and deannexation of territory adjacent to said city except that such power shall be subject to, and shall conform with the state law made and provided.
- To contract with and receive grants from any other governmental entity or agency, with respect to any local, state, or federal program, project, or works.
It is the intention of this chapter to grant and confirm to the people of all cities coming within its provisions the full right of self-government in both local and city matters within the powers enumerated herein. The statutes of the state of North Dakota, so far as applicable, shall continue to apply to home rule cities, except insofar as superseded by the charters of such cities or by ordinance passed pursuant to such charters.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 6; 1983, ch. 428, § 2; 1985, ch. 455, § 2; 1993, ch. 54, § 106; 1999, ch. 364, § 1; 2003, ch. 539, § 2; 2005, ch. 580, § 2; 2005, ch. 582, § 2; 2007, ch. 528, § 2; 2007, ch. 293, § 20; 2009, ch. 111, § 2; 2011, ch. 473, § 2; 2017, ch. 86, § 2, eff August 1, 2017; 2021, ch. 303, § 3, eff July 1, 2021.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 473, S.L. 2011 is effective for taxable events occurring after June 30, 2011.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 111, S.L. 2009 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 528, S.L. 2007 became effective July 1, 2007.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 20 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007 became effective April 5, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 47 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007.
The 2005 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 580, S.L. 2005 is effective for taxable events occurring after December 31, 2005, pursuant to section 20 of chapter 580, S.L. 2005.
The 2005 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 582, S.L. 2005 is effective for taxable events occurring after September 30, 2005, section 2 of chapter 580, S.L. 2005.
Note.
Section 40-05.1-06 was amended 2 times by the 2007 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in section 20 of chapter 293, Session Laws 2007, Senate Bill 2214; and section 1 of chapter 528, Session Laws 2007, House Bill 2380.
Section 40-05.1-06 was amended 2 times by the 2005 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in section 2 of chapter 580, Session Laws 2005, House Bill 1043; and section 2 of chapter 582, Session Laws 2005, Senate Bill 2050.
Cross-References.
Crimes defined by state law not to be superseded by home rule city’s charter or ordinance, see § 12.1-01-05.
Notes to Decisions
- Adjudication of Ordinance Violations.
- Changing Form of Government.
- Implementing Powers.
- “City Officers”.
- Contracts.
- Criminal and Noncriminal Offenses.
- Employee Pensions.
- Implementing Powers.
- Ordinance Coupling Zoning and Eminent Domain Powers.
- Property Located Outside City Limits.
Adjudication of Ordinance Violations.
Imposition of a fine for violation of municipal ordinances was reversed and remanded for entry of an order vacating the decision because the Fargo Administrative Enforcement Board had no statutory authority to adjudicate the owner’s alleged violations of the municipal ordinances and its decision was void, when there was no authority for the creation of an administrative system for adjudication of alleged violations of ordinances or regulations enacted by the municipality as an alternative to municipal court and the responsibilities granted to the Board conflicted with N.D.C.C. § 40-18-01(1). City of Fargo v. Malme, 2007 ND 137, 737 N.W.2d 390, 2007 N.D. LEXIS 141 (N.D. 2007).
Changing Form of Government.
The legislature did not intend, and the statutory provisions do not give, home rule cities the authority to select any form of government they may desire; in the matter of changing the form of government, the legislature intended home rule cities to be governed by those laws applying to cities generally. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
Implementing Powers.
District court did not err in granting the city summary judgment on the rental house owner's claim that it did not have authority to charge a re-inspection fee where the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) provided for fees to carry out inspection responsibilities, the city had adopted the IPMC by reference, N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-06(2) and Fargo, N.D., Municipal Code § 31.0102 authorized such fees, and the owner had not shown that the city's use of an inspector and need to be reimbursed the costs related to re-inspections was unreasonable. City of Fargo v. Rakowski, 2016 ND 79, 877 N.W.2d 814, 2016 N.D. LEXIS 78 (N.D. 2016).
“City Officers”.
Term “city officers” in subdivision 4 is not the executive or governing body but is intended to refer only to individual officers, either elected or appointed. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
Contracts.
Where city was acting within its powers to enter into a labor agreement with firefighters but did not comply with the statutory procedural requirements necessary to form a contract, city’s liability to firefighters was limited to the reasonable value of services rendered. Firefighters Local 642 v. Fargo, 321 N.W.2d 473, 1982 N.D. LEXIS 289 (N.D. 1982).
Criminal and Noncriminal Offenses.
N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 precluded the City of Fargo, North Dakota, a home rule city, from imposing fees for noncriminal traffic offenses that exceeded the limits set forth for equivalent violations in N.D.C.C. § 39-06.1-06, because N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 clearly and unambiguously precludes a home rule city from superseding criminal or noncriminal offenses defined by State law, when a penalty that exceeds the limits delineated by equivalent State law supersedes State law; the word “offense” rather than the word “crimes” is used in the text of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05, and an “offense” under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-05 includes noncriminal, as well as criminal offenses. Sauby v. City of Fargo, 2008 ND 60, 747 N.W.2d 65, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 60 (N.D. 2008).
Employee Pensions.
City’s power to provide compensation for its employees was not governed by N.D.C.C. § 40-05-01(69) because the city was a home rule city and had availed itself of the power to regulate employee compensation and supersede state law under N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-06 by implementing its home rule charter compensation provision by ordinance; section 40-05-01(69) provided that a municipality had the power to consolidate existing pension plans, which the city did when it repealed the prior ordinances providing separate pension plans and enacted a new ordinance for a combined employee pension plan. Klug v. City of Minot, 2011 ND 67, 795 N.W.2d 906, 2011 N.D. LEXIS 68 (N.D. 2011).
N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-06 authorized home rule cities to provide compensation for their employees, pension plans were compensation, and the city’s home rule charter and implementing ordinance met the requirements; the city had the authority to combine the police and city employee pension plans under its home rule charter, and the city’s ordinances relating to the pension plan superseded conflicting state law. Klug v. City of Minot, 2011 ND 67, 795 N.W.2d 906, 2011 N.D. LEXIS 68 (N.D. 2011).
Implementing Powers.
If the powers enumerated in this section are not stated in the charter, or if they are stated in the charter but are not implemented by ordinance, the home rule city may not avail itself of such powers, but will be governed by the statutes applicable generally to all cities. Litten v. Fargo, 294 N.W.2d 628, 1980 N.D. LEXIS 249 (N.D. 1980).
Ordinance Coupling Zoning and Eminent Domain Powers.
Municipality has authority to enact land-use regulation ordinance coupling zoning power with eminent domain power to provide that, should the retroactive application of the zoning ordinance result in the type of taking of vested property rights in a manner requiring that the divested owner be compensated, then the city council may commence eminent domain proceedings or authorize a confession of judgment to compensate the divested owner in order to permit the retroactive application of the ordinance. City of Minot v. Central Ave. News, 308 N.W.2d 851, 1981 N.D. LEXIS 340 (N.D. 1981).
Property Located Outside City Limits.
—Conflict with Township.
City-acquired property located outside the city limits is not automatically exempt from township zoning ordinances; there must be a balancing of the public interests to determine if such exemption should be allowed, with the city having the burden of proof that the balance of interests is on its side. Fargo v. Harwood Township, 256 N.W.2d 694, 1977 N.D. LEXIS 148 (N.D. 1977).
Law Reviews.
Municipal Corporations — Legislative Control of Municipal Acts, Rights and Liabilities — Home Rule Cities Lack Authority to Create Random Forms of Government, 57 N.D. L. Rev. 655 (1981).
40-05.1-06.1. Sales tax revenue transfer to school districts prohibited.
Notwithstanding the provisions of chapters 54-40 and 54-40.3 or any other provision of law, revenue from sales, use, or other excise taxes levied under this chapter may not be transferred to or for the primary benefit of a school district except for payment of bonded indebtedness incurred before April 19, 2007, or for capital construction and associated costs approved by the electors of the city before April 19, 2007.
Source:
S.L. 2007, ch. 103, § 2.
Effective Date.
This section became effective April 19, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 3 of chapter 103, S.L. 2007.
40-05.1-07. Amendment or repeal.
The home rule charter adopted by any city may be amended or repealed by proposals submitted to and ratified by the qualified electors of the city in the same general manner provided in section 40-05.1-02 and section 40-05.1-04 for the adoption of the charter. Amendments may be proposed by the governing body of the city or by petition of the number of electors provided in section 40-05.1-02 and submitted to the voters at the same election. The voters may at their option accept or reject any or all of the amendments by a majority vote of qualified electors voting on the question at the election. A proposal to repeal a home rule charter that has been adopted must likewise be submitted to the electors of the city as set forth in this section. One copy of a ratified amendment or a repeal of a home rule charter must be filed with the secretary of state and one with the city auditor. Upon proper filing of the amendment or repeal, the courts shall take judicial notice of the amendment or repeal.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 7; 1997, ch. 108, § 22; 1999, ch. 363, § 2.
40-05.1-08. Commission — Terms of office — Vacancies.
The terms of office of the members of the charter commission shall be four years. Any vacancy on said commission shall be filled by the governing body of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 8.
40-05.1-09. Restriction on proposals to amend or repeal. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 53.
40-05.1-10. Manner of calling and holding elections.
The elections provided for in this chapter shall be called and held in the same manner as is provided for the calling and holding of city elections except that all qualified voters of the city shall be eligible to vote at such elections. The form of ballot shall be prescribed by the charter commission so that the voter may signify whether the voter is for or against the proposed home rule charter or the amendment or repeal, as the case may be.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 10.
40-05.1-11. Effect of amendment or repeal on salary or term of office.
Repeal of a home rule charter shall cause the city affected by such repeal to revert to the form of government of such city immediately preceding adoption of the home rule charter and when positions to which officials were elected under the home rule charter are substantially the same as positions under the form of government to which the city reverts upon repeal, such elected officials shall continue to exercise the authority of such position for the salary prescribed by the home rule charter until expiration of their terms of office as prescribed by the home rule charter. No amendment of a home rule charter shall shorten the term for which any official was elected or reduce the salary of the official’s office for that term.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 11.
40-05.1-12. Former powers preserved.
All powers heretofore granted any city by general law are hereby preserved to each home rule city, respectively, and the powers so conferred upon said cities by general law, are hereby granted to home rule cities.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 12.
40-05.1-13. Vested property — Claims for relief — Actions saved.
The adoption of any charter hereunder or any amendment thereof shall never be construed to destroy any property, action, claims for relief, claims, and demands of any nature or kind whatever vested in the city under and by virtue of any charter theretofore existing or otherwise accruing to the city, but all such claims for relief, claims, or demands vest in and inure to the city and to any persons asserting any such claims against the city as fully and completely as though the said charter or amendment had not been adopted hereunder. The adoption of any charter or amendment hereunder shall never be construed to affect the right of the city to collect by special assessment any special assessment theretofore levied under any law or charter for the purpose of public improvements, nor affect any right of any contract or obligation existing between the city and any person, firm, corporation, or limited liability company for the making of any such improvements and for the purpose of collecting any such special assessments and carrying out of any such contract.
Source:
S.L. 1969, ch. 371, § 13; 1985, ch. 82, § 103; 1993, ch. 54, § 106.
CHAPTER 40-06 Governing Body in Municipalities, General Provisions
40-06-01. Jurisdiction of governing body.
Except as otherwise provided by law, a governing body of a municipality has jurisdiction:
- Over any commons or public grounds belonging to such municipality and with the consent of the majority of the owners thereof shall have power to regulate the banks, shores, and wharves of that portion of any navigable stream within the corporate limits; and
- In and over all places within one-half mile [804.67 meters] of the municipal limits for the purpose of enforcing health ordinances and regulations, and police regulations and ordinances adopted to promote the peace, order, safety, and general welfare of the municipality.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 23; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 15; R.C. 1895, §§ 2146, 2366; R.C. 1899, §§ 2146, 2366; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 43; R.C. 1905, §§ 2674, 2865; C.L. 1913, §§ 3595, 3864; R.C. 1943, § 40-0601; S.L. 1989, ch. 302, § 6; 2003, ch. 210, § 17.
Cross-References.
Police officer authority outside city limits, see § 40-20-05.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 80-104.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 124-163.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 208-246.
Compromise of claim, power of city officials as to, 15 A.L.R.2d 1359.
Law Reviews.
Powers and Procedures of City and Village Governing Boards, 31 N.D. L. Rev. 137 (1955).
40-06-02. Meetings to be public — Journal of proceedings to be kept.
All meetings of the governing body shall be open to the public, and a journal of its proceedings shall be kept.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 11; R.C. 1895, § 2142; R.C. 1899, § 2142; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 39; R.C. 1905, § 2670; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 25, 46; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 25, 46; C.L. 1913, §§ 3591, 3795, 3816; S.L. 1927, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0602.
Cross-References.
Open governmental meeting requirements, see §§ 44-04-19 to 44-04-21.
Notes to Decisions
Adjournment to Indefinite Date.
The purpose of having open meetings is to enable the public to attend those meetings and to keep in touch with the proceedings of the council or other governing body; therefore, the council may not adjourn to an indefinite date in the future. Green v. Beste, 76 N.W.2d 165, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1956).
Law Reviews.
Government in the Sunshine: The Status of Open Meetings and Open Records Laws in North Dakota, Daniel S. Guy and Jack McDonald, 72 N.D. L. Rev. 745 (1996).
40-06-03. Quorum.
A majority of the members of the governing body of a municipality shall constitute a quorum to do business but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. The governing body may compel the attendance of absentees under such penalties as may be prescribed by ordinance, and may employ the police of the municipality for that purpose.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 8; R.C. 1895, § 2139; R.C. 1899, § 2139; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 36; R.C. 1905, § 2667; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 46; 1911, ch. 77, § 46; C.L. 1913, §§ 3588, 3816; R.C. 1943, § 40-0603.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 90.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 146.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 231.
What constitutes requisite majority of members of municipal council voting on issue, 43 A.L.R.2d 698.
Abstention from voting of member of municipal council present at session as affecting requisite voting majority, 63 A.L.R.3d 1072.
40-06-04. Reconsidering or rescinding vote at special meeting.
No vote of the governing body of a municipality shall be reconsidered or rescinded at a special meeting unless there is present at such special meeting as large a number of members as were present when such vote was taken.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 13; R.C. 1895, § 2144; R.C. 1899, § 2144; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 41; R.C. 1905, § 2672; C.L. 1913, § 3593; R.C. 1943, § 40-0604.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 102.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 306.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 242.
40-06-05. Rules of procedure — Expelling members.
The governing body of a municipality shall determine its rules of procedure, punish its members or persons present for disorderly conduct by fine, and with the concurrence of two-thirds of its members may expel a member from a session but may not expel the member a second time for the same offense. The governing body may fine or expel any member for neglect of duty or for unnecessary absence from its sessions.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 7; R.C. 1895, § 2138; R.C. 1899, § 2138; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 35; R.C. 1905, § 2666; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 46; 1911, ch. 77, § 46; C.L. 1913, §§ 3587, 3816; R.C. 1943, § 40-0605.
40-06-06. Conviction of bribery — Office deemed vacant.
Any member of a city governing body convicted of bribery shall be deemed to have vacated that member’s office.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 7; R.C. 1895, § 2138; R.C. 1899, § 2138; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 35; R.C. 1905, § 2666; C.L. 1913, § 3587; R.C. 1943, § 40-0606.
Cross-References.
Bribery, see ch. 12.1-12.
40-06-07. Exercise of power through ordinance when method of procedure not set out.
The governing body of a municipality may provide by ordinance the details necessary for the full exercise of any power conferred upon it by any law of this state when the manner of exercising such power is not specified otherwise.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 48; R.C. 1905, § 2679; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 49; 1911, ch. 77, § 49; C.L. 1913, §§ 3600, 3819; R.C. 1943, § 40-0607.
Notes to Decisions
Municipal Discretion.
Once the existence and extent of a municipal corporation’s powers have been determined and measured, the rule of strict construction no longer applies and the means of exercising those powers, where not prescribed by the legislature, are left to the discretion of the municipal authorities. Lang v. Cavalier, 59 N.D. 75, 228 N.W. 819, 1930 N.D. LEXIS 126 (N.D. 1930).
40-06-08. Action on committee reports deferred upon request.
Upon the request of any two members present, any report of a committee of the governing body shall be deferred for final action to the next regular meeting after the report is made.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 14; R.C. 1895, § 2145; R.C. 1899, § 2145; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 42; R.C. 1905, § 2673; C.L. 1913, § 3594; R.C. 1943, § 40-0608.
40-06-09. Change in number of members of city governing body — Election.
-
The process for increasing or decreasing the number of members of a city governing body pursuant to sections 40-04.1-01, 40-08-03, and 40-09-01 may be initiated:
- By resolution approved by a majority vote of the governing body of the city; or
- By a petition signed by ten percent or more of the total number of qualified electors of the city voting for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election and submitted to the governing body of the city.
- The governing body of the city shall submit the question of increasing or decreasing the number of members of the city governing body to the electors of the city at any regular city election or primary or general election as specified in the resolution or petition submitted pursuant to subsection 1. The question requires an affirmative vote of those voting on the question for passage.
- If an increase in the number of members of the city governing body is approved by the electors, the additional members must be elected at the next regular city election or as specified in the resolution or petition pursuant to subsection 1. The additional members shall hold office for terms of four years and until a successor is elected and qualified, unless different terms are specified in the resolution or petition pursuant to subsection 1. The terms of office must be arranged on a staggered basis as otherwise provided by law.
- If a decrease in the number of members of the city governing body is approved by the electors, the offices identified for abolition shall continue until the time when the terms of those offices expire. A different procedure for abolition of the offices may be specified in the resolution or petition pursuant to subsection 1.
- All statutory provisions relating specifically to a ten-member council or eleven-member council, whether repealed or amended by chapter 401 of the 1993 Session Laws House Bill No. 1347, including sections 40-08-03.1, 40-08-03.2, 40-08-04, 40-08-04.1, 40-08-06.1, and 40-12-01, continue to apply to those councils existing on August 1, 1993, until such time as an increase or decrease occurs in the number of members of those councils pursuant to this section.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 36.
CHAPTER 40-07 Villages, Governing Body and Other Officers [Repealed]
[Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285]
CHAPTER 40-08 Governing Body and Executive Officer in Council Cities
40-08-01. City council — Who constitutes.
The governing body of a city operating under the council form of government is the city council, which is composed of the mayor and council members.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2132; R.C. 1899, § 2132; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 29; R.C. 1905, § 2660; C.L. 1913, § 3581; R.C. 1943, § 40-0801; S.L. 1991, ch. 440, § 3.
Notes to Decisions
Mayor Not Member of Council, Exception.
The chief duties of a mayor are as executive officer of the city, though he is a member of the city council only in a limited sense, with the right to preside and to cast the deciding vote in case of a tie. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 80-104.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 124-158.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 208-246.
40-08-02. Governing body is judge of election and qualifications of members.
The city council shall be judge of the election and qualifications of its own members.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 6; R.C. 1895, § 2137; R.C. 1899, § 2137; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 34; R.C. 1905, § 2665; C.L. 1913, § 3586; R.C. 1943, § 40-0802.
Notes to Decisions
Contest for Mayor’s Office.
The city council is without jurisdiction to try and determine a contest for the office of mayor. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Jurisdiction of Court.
This statute does not divest the court of jurisdiction to determine the right to the office of councilman on an information in the nature of quo warranto. State ex rel. Sathre v. Quickstad, 66 N.D. 689, 268 N.W. 683, 1936 N.D. LEXIS 215 (N.D. 1936).
40-08-03. Number of council members.
The number of council members is not less than three. The number of council members may be increased or decreased pursuant to section 40-06-09.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2133; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 1; R.C. 1899, § 2133; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 30; R.C. 1905, § 2661; C.L. 1913, § 3582; S.L. 1929, ch. 168, § 1; 1933, ch. 166, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0803; S.L. 1957, ch. 275, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-0803; S.L. 1969, ch. 372, § 1; 1973, ch. 323, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 71; 1991, ch. 440, § 4; 1991, ch. 444, § 1; 1993, ch. 401, § 37.
Notes to Decisions
When Question Litigated.
The effect of the council’s failure to redistrict the city cannot be litigated in an action to prevent the city from contracting to employ assistants to the city attorney. Scott v. Jamestown, 56 N.D. 454, 217 N.W. 668, 1928 N.D. LEXIS 231 (N.D. 1928).
40-08-03.1. Change to ten council members and mayor — Petition required. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 53.
40-08-03.2. City auditor to pass on sufficiency of petition requesting change to ten council members and mayor. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 53.
40-08-04. Election of council members.
In cities containing six hundred inhabitants or less, the council members must be elected at large. Except as provided in section 40-08-04.2, in all other cities operating under the council form of government, the council members must be elected by wards.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2133; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 1; R.C. 1899, § 2133; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 30; R.C. 1905, § 2661; C.L. 1913, § 3582; S.L. 1929, ch. 168, § 1; 1933, ch. 166, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0804; S.L. 1969, ch. 372, § 6; 1991, ch. 440, § 7; 1993, ch. 401, § 38; 1997, ch. 350, § 1.
40-08-04.1. Procedure when petition to change to ten council members and mayor is filed — Special election — Ballot. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 53.
40-08-04.2. Election at large of council members from wards — Option.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the governing body of a city having a population not exceeding five thousand and which is operating under the council form of government may provide by ordinance for the election of all council members at large. If the council members are elected at large pursuant to this section, the governing body of the city may establish wards in accordance with section 40-08-04 and require that the council members elected from each ward must be residents of the ward.
Source:
S.L. 1991, ch. 445, § 2.
40-08-05. Qualifications of council members.
An individual is not eligible to the office of council member if the individual is not a qualified elector of and resident within the ward for which the individual was elected, except that in cities where council members are elected at large and not required to be a resident of the ward for which the individual is elected pursuant to section 40-08-04.2, the individual must be a qualified elector of and a resident within the city.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 5; R.C. 1895, § 2136; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 2; R.C. 1899, § 2136; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 33; R.C. 1905, § 2664; C.L. 1913, § 3585; S.L. 1937, ch. 170, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0805; S.L. 1957, ch. 277, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0805; S.L. 1991, ch. 440, § 9; 1991, ch. 445, § 1; 2013, ch. 312, § 1.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 312, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
Cross-References.
Change of ward boundaries causing council member to reside outside ward, effect, see § 40-52-08.
Notes to Decisions
Residency Requirement.
Although councilman of Medora purchased a home, received mail, banked, and had a telephone in Dickinson, he satisfied the residency requirement of this section to be a councilman of Medora where there was other evidence to establish that he maintained an actual and legal residence in Medora. Dietz v. Medora, 333 N.W.2d 702, 1983 N.D. LEXIS 266 (N.D. 1983).
Collateral References.
Validity of requirement that candidate or public officer have been resident of governmental unit for specified period, 65 A.L.R.3d 1048.
Construction and Application of Statutes and Ordinances Concerning Establishment of Residency, as Condition for Running for Municipal Office. 74 A.L.R.6th 209.
40-08-06. Term of office of council members — Staggered terms provided for in cities where other than ten council members elected.
Council members shall hold office for four years and until their successors are elected and qualified. Terms of council members must be arranged so that one-half of the council members in any city, as nearly as practicable, are elected in any one election. When a city first adopts the council form of government or changes the number of council members, or when a city that has adopted the commission system of government returns to the city council form of government as provided by section 40-04-08, the alternation of the terms of the council members must be perfected as follows: of the council members elected in each ward, the one receiving the greater number of votes shall serve until the fourth Tuesday in June following the second succeeding biennial election and the one receiving the lesser number of votes shall serve until the fourth Tuesday in June following the biennial election succeeding the council member’s election; if the city is not divided into wards, the one-half of the council members elected in the entire city receiving the greater number of votes shall serve until the fourth Tuesday in June following the second succeeding biennial election and the one-half of the council members elected in the entire city receiving the lesser number of votes shall serve until the fourth Tuesday in June following the biennial election succeeding their election. Whenever, for any reason, vacancies exist on the council which require an unexpired term to be filled by election, the unexpired term must be designated on the ballot separate from any other regular term or terms that may also appear on the ballot. Candidates seeking nomination to an unexpired term are required to indicate whether or not they are seeking a regular term of office or an unexpired term of office on their nominating petitions as set forth in section 40-21-07.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 3; R.C. 1895, § 2134; R.C. 1899, § 2134; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 31; R.C. 1905, § 2662; C.L. 1913, § 3583; S.L. 1933, ch. 167, § 2; 1935, ch. 190, § 1; 1941, ch. 198, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0806; S.L. 1969, ch. 372, § 7; 1991, ch. 440, § 10; 1991, ch. 442, § 5; 1999, ch. 208, § 4; 1999, ch. 289, § 3.
40-08-06.1. Terms of office under ten council members — Staggered terms provided for — Nominating petition requirements. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 53.
40-08-07. Compensation of council members.
Each council member is entitled to receive compensation for services as established by ordinance.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 11; R.C. 1895, § 2165; R.C. 1899, § 2165; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 66; R.C. 1905, § 2697; C.L. 1913, § 3621; S.L. 1921, ch. 30; 1925 Supp., § 3621; R.C. 1943, § 40-0807; S.L. 1957, ch. 278, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0807; S.L. 1971, ch. 389, § 1; 1975, ch. 369, § 1; 1981, ch. 411, § 1; 1985, ch. 456, § 1; 1991, ch. 440, § 12; 2001, ch. 357, § 2.
Collateral References.
Validity of statutory classifications based on population — Governmental employee salary or pension statutes, 96 A.L.R.3d 538.
40-08-08. Vacancies on council — How filled.
If a vacancy occurs in a city council office by death, resignation, or otherwise, the city council may call a special city election to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term, or may, after fifteen days of the date of the vacancy appoint a person from the ward in which the council member previously holding was elected or appointed to fill the vacancy until the next city election, at which election the unexpired term must be filled. Upon petition of five percent of the qualified electors of the ward, as determined by the total number of votes cast in that ward in the last city general election, the council shall call a special election to fill a vacancy occurring more than six months before the next city election, if the petition has been submitted within fifteen days and before four p.m. of the fifteenth day of the date of the vacancy or of the vacancy being filled by appointment. If the petition is mailed, it must be in the possession of the council or its representative before four p.m. on the fifteenth day after the vacancy occurs or after the vacancy was filled by appointment.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 4; R.C. 1895, § 2135; R.C. 1899, § 2135; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 32; R.C. 1905, § 2663; C.L. 1913, § 3584; R.C. 1943, § 40-0808; S.L. 1955, ch. 263, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0808; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 94; 1985, ch. 235, § 74; 1987, ch. 491, § 1; 1991, ch. 440, § 13; 2011, ch. 294, § 1.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011 became effective April 4, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 6 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011.
40-08-09. Restrictions on members of council.
-
Except as provided in this section, no member of the city council shall:
- Be eligible to any other office the salary of which is payable out of the city treasury;
- Hold any other office under the city government; or
- Hold a position of remuneration in the employment of the city.
- A member of the city council may serve as an ambulance crew member employed by the city or under a contract with the city and be remunerated for those services or as a volunteer firefighter or ambulance crew member for the city and be compensated for attending training or responding to emergency calls or may be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending training or in responding to emergency calls.
- A member of the city council in a city having a population of five hundred or fewer may hold a position of remuneration in the employment of the city if no other qualified individual is available to hold the position of remuneration at an equal cost to the city. The decision to employ the member of the city council must receive the unanimous approval of the other members of the council, and the approval must be documented in the official minutes of the council. This subsection does not apply to appointed officer positions under section 40-14-04.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 5; R.C. 1895, § 2136; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 2; R.C. 1899, § 2136; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 33; R.C. 1905, § 2664; C.L. 1913, § 3585; S.L. 1937, ch. 170, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0809; S.L. 1957, ch. 277, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-0809; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 95; 1987, ch. 491, § 2; 2013, ch. 313, § 1; 2017, ch. 278, § 1, eff March 22, 2017.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 313, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
Cross-References.
Interest in contracts or work of municipality prohibited, see § 40-13-05.
40-08-10. Meetings of council — Regular, special, and for organization.
The city council shall hold its regular meetings at least once a month on a date certain established by resolution or ordinance of the council, and may prescribe by ordinance the manner in which special meetings may be called as well as the establishment of any additional regular meetings desired. If a regular meeting falls upon a holiday, the meeting must be held upon the next business day with the same effect as if conducted upon the day appointed. All regular and special meetings must be held at a time and place designated by the city council. The first meeting for the organization of the city council must be held on the fourth Tuesday in June of each even-numbered year.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 9; 1895, ch. 29, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2140; R.C. 1899, § 2140; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 37; R.C. 1905, § 2668; C.L. 1913, § 3589; R.C. 1943, § 40-0810; S.L. 1973, ch. 324, § 1; 1975, ch. 370, § 1; 1991, ch. 442, § 7; 2003, ch. 339, § 2.
Notes to Decisions
Prevention of Secret Meetings.
The public is entitled to have the city council meet at the times specified by the statute or by legal ordinance so as to prevent the council from doing business in any secret meetings. Green v. Beste, 76 N.W.2d 165, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1956).
40-08-11. When president and vice president of council elected.
At the organization meeting in each even-numbered year, the members of the city council shall proceed to elect from their number a president and a vice president who shall hold their respective offices until their successors are elected at the organization meeting following the next biennial election.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 10; 1889, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2141; R.C. 1899, § 2141; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 38; R.C. 1905, § 2669; C.L. 1913, § 3590; R.C. 1943, § 40-0811.
40-08-12. Publication of proceedings. [Repealed]
Repealed by I.M. approved November 8, 1994, S.L. 1995, ch. 637, § 2.
40-08-13. Presiding officer of council in absence or disability of mayor — President of council.
The president of the city council shall be the presiding officer of the council in the absence or temporary disability of the mayor. In the absence or disability of the mayor and president of the city council, the vice president shall be the presiding officer.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 10; 1889, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2141; R.C. 1899, § 2141; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 38; R.C. 1905, § 2669; C.L. 1913, § 3590; R.C. 1943, § 40-0813.
40-08-14. Mayor — Qualifications — Term.
The chief executive officer of the city is the mayor. The mayor shall be a qualified elector within the city and shall hold office for four years and until a successor is elected and qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2116; R.C. 1899, § 2116; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 13; R.C. 1905, § 2644; C.L. 1913, § 3565; S.L. 1933, ch. 167, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0814.
40-08-15. Compensation of mayor.
The mayor shall receive such compensation as the city council may direct by ordinance.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 10; R.C. 1895, § 2164; R.C. 1899, § 2164; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 65; R.C. 1905, § 2696; C.L. 1913, § 3620; R.C. 1943, § 40-0815; S.L. 2003, ch. 343, § 1.
40-08-16. Vacancy in office of mayor — Filled by election or by council — President of council to be acting mayor.
If a vacancy occurs in the office of mayor, the city council may call a special city election to fill such vacancy for the unexpired term or may, after fifteen days from the date of such vacancy, elect one of its members to act as mayor. The member so elected shall possess all the rights and powers of the mayor until the next election and until a mayor is elected and qualified. Upon petition of five percent of the qualified electors, as determined by the total number of votes cast in the city in the last city general election, the council shall call a special election to fill a vacancy occurring more than six months prior to the next city election, provided such petition is submitted within fifteen days of the date of such vacancy. During the interim between the date when a vacancy occurs in the office of mayor and election and qualification of a successor, the president of the city council shall be the acting mayor.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, §§ 2, 3; R.C. 1895, §§ 2117, 2118; R.C. 1899, §§ 2117, 2118; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 14, 15; R.C. 1905, §§ 2645, 2646; C.L. 1913, §§ 3566, 3567; R.C. 1943, § 40-0816; S.L. 1955, ch. 263, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-0816; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 75; 2011, ch. 294, § 2.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011 became effective April 4, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 6 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Filling of Vacancy.
A vacancy in the office of mayor, if for more than a year, is filled by election, and if less than that period, by the city council. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
40-08-17. Absence or disability of mayor — Acting mayor.
During the absence of the mayor from the city or during the mayor’s temporary disability, the president of the city council shall be the acting mayor and shall possess all the powers of the mayor. In the absence or disability of the mayor and president of the city council, the vice president of the city council shall be the acting mayor.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 10; 1889, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2141; R.C. 1899, § 2141; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 38; R.C. 1905, § 2669; C.L. 1913, § 3590; R.C. 1943, § 40-0817.
40-08-18. Mayor to preside at council meetings — Voting power of mayor.
The mayor shall preside at all meetings of the city council, but shall not vote except in case of a tie, when the mayor shall cast the deciding vote.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 6; R.C. 1895, § 2120; R.C. 1899, § 2120; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 17; R.C. 1905, § 2648; C.L. 1913, § 3569; R.C. 1943, § 40-0818.
40-08-19. Mayor may remove appointive officers — Reasons for removal to be given.
The mayor may remove any officer appointed by the mayor whenever the mayor is of the opinion that the interests of the city demand such removal, but the mayor shall report the reasons for such removal to the council at its next regular meeting.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 7; R.C. 1895, § 2121; R.C. 1899, § 2121; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 18; R.C. 1905, § 2649; C.L. 1913, § 3570; R.C. 1943, § 40-0819.
Notes to Decisions
City Council.
This section, requiring the mayor to report his reasons for removal to the city council, was not enacted for the benefit of the officer removed; rather, it is for the benefit of the city council, so that the members thereof might be apprised of the events occurring in city government. Lee v. Walstad, 368 N.W.2d 542, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1985).
This section does not appear to contemplate any action by the city council following the report by the mayor. Lee v. Walstad, 368 N.W.2d 542, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1985).
City Maintenance Person.
A city maintenance person did not meet the criteria to be classified as an officer; therefore, the mayor was without lawful authority to terminate the city maintenance person’s employment without council approval because such authority was not expressly or impliedly conferred upon the mayor by this section, which grants power to remove officers, but not employees of the city. Hennum v. Medina, 402 N.W.2d 327, 1987 N.D. LEXIS 263 (N.D. 1987).
Property Interest in Employment.
Section does not confer a property interest in employment as chief of police. Lee v. Walstad, 368 N.W.2d 542, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1985).
Reinstatement.
Any factual issue as to whether or not mayor reported his reasons for removing chief of police from his position would not be material insofar as that individual’s request for writ of mandamus seeking reinstatement was concerned. Lee v. Walstad, 368 N.W.2d 542, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 324 (N.D. 1985).
40-08-20. Mayor may suppress disorder and keep peace.
The mayor may exercise within the city limits the powers conferred upon a sheriff to suppress disorder and keep the peace.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 8; R.C. 1895, § 2122; R.C. 1899, § 2122; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 19; R.C. 1905, § 2650; C.L. 1913, § 3571; R.C. 1943, § 40-0820.
Cross-References.
Mayor to order police to attend public meetings, see § 29-02-23.
Notes to Decisions
President of Commission.
The president of a city commission has the same powers as conferred upon the mayor by this statute. State ex rel. Shaw v. Frazier, 39 N.D. 430, 167 N.W. 510, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 40 (N.D. 1918).
40-08-21. Release of prisoners by mayor — Report to council. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 375, § 16.
40-08-22. Mayor to perform duties prescribed by law — Enforce laws and ordinances.
The mayor shall perform all duties prescribed by law or by the city ordinances and shall see that the laws and ordinances are faithfully executed.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 10; R.C. 1895, § 2124; R.C. 1899, § 2124; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 21; R.C. 1905, § 2652; C.L. 1913, § 3573; R.C. 1943, § 40-0822.
40-08-23. Inspection of books, records, and papers of city by mayor.
The mayor, at any time, may examine and inspect the books, records, and papers of any agent, employee, or officer of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 11; R.C. 1895, § 2125; R.C. 1899, § 2125; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 22; R.C. 1905, § 2653; C.L. 1913, § 3574; R.C. 1943, § 40-0823.
40-08-24. Ordinance or resolution signed or vetoed by mayor.
The mayor shall sign or veto each ordinance or resolution passed by the council. Any action vetoed by the mayor may be overridden by the city council as provided under section 40-11-05.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2130; R.C. 1899, § 2130; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 27; R.C. 1905, § 2658; C.L. 1913, § 3579; R.C. 1943, § 40-0824; 2015, ch. 279, § 1, eff August 1, 2015.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 279, S.L. 2015 became effective August 1, 2015.
Notes to Decisions
Paving of Streets.
A resolution for the repaving of certain streets is subject to veto by the mayor. State ex rel. Kettle River Quarries Co. v. Duis, 17 N.D. 319, 116 N.W. 751, 1908 N.D. LEXIS 62 (N.D. 1908).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 107.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 311-314.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 264-271.
40-08-25. Messages to council.
The mayor annually and from time to time shall give the council information relative to the affairs of the city and shall recommend for its consideration such measures as the mayor may deem expedient.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 12; R.C. 1895, § 2126; R.C. 1899, § 2126; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 23; R.C. 1905, § 2654; C.L. 1913, § 3575; R.C. 1943, § 40-0825.
40-08-26. Mayor may call on residents to aid in enforcing ordinances.
When necessary, the mayor may call on each resident of the city over the age of eighteen years to aid in enforcing the laws and ordinances of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 13; R.C. 1895, § 2127; R.C. 1899, § 2127; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 24; R.C. 1905, § 2655; C.L. 1913, § 3576; S.L. 1941, ch. 205, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0826; 2015, ch. 279, § 2, eff August 1, 2015.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 279, S.L. 2015 became effective August 1, 2015.
40-08-27. Police chief and police officers appointed by mayor.
The mayor may appoint any number of police officers the mayor and the city council deem necessary to preserve the peace of the city and the mayor shall appoint one of the number as chief of police. Such appointment shall be subject to the approval of the council.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 17; R.C. 1895, § 2131; R.C. 1899, § 2131; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 28; R.C. 1905, § 2659; C.L. 1913, § 3580; R.C. 1943, § 40-0827.
40-08-28. Mayor may administer oaths.
The mayor of each city may administer oaths and affirmations.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 13; R.C. 1895, § 2167; R.C. 1899, § 2167; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 68; R.C. 1905, § 2699; C.L. 1913, § 3623; R.C. 1943, § 40-0828.
CHAPTER 40-09 Governing Body and Executive Officer in Commission Cities
40-09-01. Board of city commissioners — Composition.
The governing body of a city operating under the commission system of government is the board of city commissioners which is composed of the president of the board of city commissioners and not less than three city commissioners. The number of city commissioners may be increased or decreased pursuant to section 40-06-09.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 15; 1911, ch. 77, § 15; C.L. 1913, § 3785; R.C. 1943, § 40-0901; S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 39.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 80 et seq.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 124 et seq.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 208 et seq.
40-09-02. Governing body is judge of election and qualifications of members.
The board of city commissioners shall be the judge of the election and qualifications of its own members.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 46; 1911, ch. 77, § 46; C.L. 1913, § 3816; R.C. 1943, § 40-0902.
40-09-03. Regulations governing election of commissioners.
The members of the board of city commissioners must be elected at large and not by wards. Each voter may vote for one of the candidates for the office of president of the board of city commissioners and for as many candidates for the office of city commissioner as there are commissioners to be elected. Candidates for the city commission may run for either the office of city commissioner or the office of president of the board of city commissioners but not both in the same election. A candidate may run for only one office in a city at any given election.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 15; 1911, ch. 77, § 15; C.L. 1913, § 3785; R.C. 1943, § 40-0903; 2007, ch. 350, § 1; 2009, ch. 180, § 26.
Effective Date.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 26 of chapter 180, S.L. 2009 became August 1, 2009.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 350, S.L. 2007 became effective August 1, 2007.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Cumulative Voting not Authorized.
Cumulative voting in the election of city commissioners is not authorized. State ex rel. Shaw v. Thompson, 21 N.D. 426, 131 N.W. 231, 1911 N.D. LEXIS 102 (N.D. 1911).
40-09-04. Commissioners — Terms — Resignations.
Each commissioner and the president of the board of city commissioners shall hold office for four years commencing on the fourth Tuesday in June of the year in which the officer was elected and until a successor has been duly elected and qualified. The commission shall establish by ordinance a procedure whereby one-half of all commissioners, as nearly as practicable, are elected biennially. The president or any other member of the board may resign from office by filing a written resignation with the city auditor, who shall submit the resignation to the board of city commissioners at its next regular meeting or at a special meeting called for consideration of the resignation. The resignation is effective upon its acceptance by the board.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 16; 1911, ch. 77, § 16; 1913, ch. 78, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3786; S.L. 1931, ch. 203, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0904; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 8; 1993, ch. 401, §§ 40, 41; 2001, ch. 179, § 5.
40-09-05. President and board of commissioners succeed to powers and duties of mayor and council.
If the city previously was organized under the council form of government, the first president and the other members of the first board of city commissioners elected after a city has incorporated under the city commission system of government are the successors of the mayor and council members of the city. Upon the qualification of the president and other members of the board, all the powers, rights, and duties of the mayor and council of the city cease. Whenever the city previously, under the decree or judgment of any court or under any law, ordinance, or resolution, has been entitled to representation through the mayor of the city and one or more of the council members of the city, on the board of directors of any incorporated company in which the city may own stock or be interested, it must be represented on the board of directors by the president of the board of city commissioners and by two other members of the board to be selected by the board.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 19; 1911, ch. 77, § 19; C.L. 1913, § 3789; R.C. 1943, § 40-0905; S.L. 1991, ch. 440, § 14.
40-09-06. Style of board — Oath and salary of commissioners.
The commissioners and the president of the board constitute the board of city commissioners and shall take an oath faithfully to perform the duties of their respective offices. The monthly salary of each city commissioner must be fixed by ordinance. The president of a commission may receive a salary of up to fifty percent more than the level set for each commissioner upon resolution by the board of city commissioners.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 20, 32; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 20, 32; 1913, ch. 80, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3790, 3802; S.L. 1943, ch. 182, §§ 1, 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-0906; S.L. 1957, ch. 278, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-0906; S.L. 1967, ch. 326, § 1; 1971, ch. 390, § 1; 1975, ch. 369, § 2; 1985, ch. 456, § 2; 2001, ch. 357, § 3.
Collateral References.
Validity of statutory classifications based on population — Governmental employee salary or pension statutes, 96 A.L.R.3d 538.
40-09-07. Bond and oath of commissioner. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 2011, ch. 294, § 5.
Effective Date.
The repeal of this section by section 5 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011 became effective April 4, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 6 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011.
40-09-08. President of board as executive officer — Duties — No veto power.
The president of the board of city commissioners shall be the executive officer of the city and shall see that all the laws of the city are enforced. The president shall have the right to vote as a member of the board but shall have no veto power.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 22, 25; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 22, 25; C.L. 1913, §§ 3792, 3795; S.L. 1927, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0908.
40-09-09. Vice president and acting president of board — Powers to act.
At the first meeting of the board after each biennial election, one of its own members shall be elected vice president. The vice president shall perform all the duties of the office of president in the absence or disability of the president to act. In the absence or disability to act of both the president and the vice president, the board shall elect one of its members as acting president, who shall have all the powers and perform all the duties of the president during the absence or disability.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 27; 1911, ch. 77, § 27; C.L. 1913, § 3797; R.C. 1943, § 40-0909.
40-09-10. Filling vacancies in board.
If a vacancy occurs in the office of a city commissioner or president of the board of city commissioners, the board may call a special city election to fill such vacancy for the unexpired term, or may, after fifteen days from the date of such vacancy appoint a person to fill such vacancy until the next city election, at which election the unexpired term shall be filled. Upon petition of five percent of the qualified electors, as determined by the total number of votes cast in the city in the last city general election, the commission shall call a special city election to fill a vacancy occurring more than six months prior to the next city election, provided such petition has been submitted within fifteen days of the date of such vacancy.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 33; 1911, ch. 77, § 33; C.L. 1913, § 3803; S.L. 1935, ch. 193, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0910; S.L. 1955, ch. 263, § 3; 1957 Supp., § 40-0910; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 76; 2011, ch. 294, § 3.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 3 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011 became effective April 4, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 6 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011.
40-09-11. Meetings of board — Regular and special — Action on departmental matters.
The board of city commissioners shall meet in regular meeting at least once a month and at such additional times as the board, by ordinance, may establish. All regular meetings shall be held at a time and place to be designated by the board. No action of the board shall be effective unless upon a vote of a majority of a quorum of the members of such board. No final action shall be taken in any matter concerning the special department of any absent commissioner unless such business has been made a special order of the day or such action is taken at a regular meeting of the board. Special meetings may be called at any time by the president or any two members of the board to consider matters mentioned in the call of such meeting. Written notice of any special meeting shall be given to each member of the board.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 28; 1911, ch. 77, § 28; C.L. 1913, § 3798; R.C. 1943, § 40-0911; S.L. 1955, ch. 264, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-0911; S.L. 2003, ch. 339, § 3.
Notes to Decisions
Contracts.
This section requires a majority vote of the commissioners to ratify any contract. Firefighters Local 642 v. Fargo, 321 N.W.2d 473, 1982 N.D. LEXIS 289 (N.D. 1982).
Where city was acting within its powers to enter into a labor agreement with firefighters but the city did not comply with the statutory procedural requirements necessary to form a contract with a municipality, city’s liability to firefighters was limited to the reasonable value of services rendered. Firefighters Local 642 v. Fargo, 321 N.W.2d 473, 1982 N.D. LEXIS 289 (N.D. 1982).
Collateral References.
Abstention from voting of member of municipal council present at session as affecting requisite voting majority, 63 A.L.R.3d 1072.
40-09-12. Departments of administration of city divided among commissioners — Duties.
The board of city commissioners, by a majority vote of all the members thereof, shall designate from among its members:
- A police and fire commissioner who shall have under that commissioner’s special charge the enforcement of all police regulations of the city and the general supervision of the fire department of the city.
- A commissioner of streets and improvements who shall have under that commissioner’s special charge the supervision of the streets and alleys of the city and who shall be charged with responsibility for the lighting, cleaning, and sanitary condition of the streets and alleys and with the enforcement of all rules and regulations relating thereto, and with the preservation of the health of the inhabitants of the city. That commissioner shall have under that commissioner’s special charge the supervision of all public improvements and shall see that all contracts for such improvements and the conditions of all grants of franchises or privileges are complied with faithfully and performed.
- A waterworks and sewerage commissioner who shall have under that commissioner’s special charge the waterworks and sewerage department of the city and who shall see to the enforcement of all regulations with respect to those departments and all revenue pertaining to those departments.
- A commissioner of finance and revenue who shall have under that commissioner’s special charge the enforcement of all laws for the assessment and collection of taxes of every kind and the collection of all revenues belonging to the city, from whatever source the same may be derived, and who shall examine into and keep informed as to the finances of the city.
The duties assigned to the various members of the board by this section may be otherwise distributed by a majority vote of the board’s members.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 24; 1911, ch. 77, § 24; C.L. 1913, § 3794; R.C. 1943, § 40-0912.
40-09-13. Accounts — Audited by respective commissioners — Approved by board.
The commissioner who is the head of each department shall audit all accounts against it, but before payment the accounts shall be acted upon and approved by at least three members of the board of city commissioners. Approval by at least three members of the board of city commissioners shall be recorded in the record of the board and this shall be sufficient to indicate approval without requiring the approving members to sign or initial the voucher or order for payment of the account.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 25; 1911, ch. 77, § 25; C.L. 1913, § 3795; S.L. 1927, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-0913; S.L. 1975, ch. 366, § 5.
40-09-14. Rules and regulations governing departments and agencies of city made by board.
The board of city commissioners shall have the sole authority to pass and adopt rules and regulations concerning the organization, management, and operation of all the departments of the city and the other agencies created by it for the administration of the city’s affairs.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 23; 1911, ch. 77, § 23; C.L. 1913, § 3793; R.C. 1943, § 40-0914.
40-09-15. Special police — President of board may call — Powers. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 106, § 673.
40-09-16. Board may summon and compel attendance of witnesses and books — Punish for contempt — Process.
Whenever it is necessary for the more effective discharge of its duties, the board of city commissioners may summon and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books and papers before it. The board may punish for contempt of the board with the same fines and penalties as a district judge may inflict for contempt of the district court. All process necessary to enforce the powers conferred by this section must be signed by the president of the board, attested by the city auditor, and served by any member of the police force of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 22; 1911, ch. 77, § 22; C.L. 1913, § 3792; R.C. 1943, § 40-0916; S.L. 1991, ch. 326, § 153.
40-09-17. Restrictions on members of board.
-
Except as provided in this section, a member of the board of city commissioners may not:
- Be eligible to any other office the salary of which is payable out of the city treasury;
- Hold any other office under the city government; and
- Hold a position of remuneration in the employment of the city.
- A member of a board of city commissioners may serve as an ambulance crew member employed by the city or under a contract with the city and be remunerated for those services or as a volunteer firefighter or ambulance crew member for the city and be compensated for attending training or responding to emergency calls or may be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending training or in responding to emergency calls.
- A member of the board of city commissioners in a city having a population of five hundred or fewer may hold a position of remuneration in the employment of the city if no other qualified individual is available to hold the position of remuneration at an equal cost to the city. The decision to employ the member of the city commission must receive the unanimous approval of the other members of the commission, and the approval must be documented in the official minutes of the commission. This subsection does not apply to appointed officer positions under section 40-15-05.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 96; 2013, ch. 313, § 2; 2017, ch. 278, § 2, eff March 22, 2017.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 313, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
Cross-References.
Interest in contracts or work of municipality prohibited, see § 40-13-05.
CHAPTER 40-10 City Manager Plan
40-10-01. Petition for city manager — Contents — Notice of election — Election.
Twenty-five percent or more of the qualified electors of a city, as shown by the number of votes cast for the executive officer of the city at the preceding city election, may petition for the city manager plan of government. Within thirty days after such petition is filed with the city auditor, the governing body of the city shall provide for the submission of such proposal to the qualified electors of the city at an election to be held within ninety days after such filing. The city auditor shall give thirty days’ notice of the date of the election and of the purposes thereof. The notice of election shall state briefly the powers of the city manager if the plan should be adopted. The election shall be held, the votes canvassed, and the results declared in the same manner as in the case of city elections.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3770b1; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-1001; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 77.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 48(1, 2).
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 265 et seq.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 81-98.
Withdrawal of name from petition and time therefor, 27 A.L.R.2d 604.
40-10-02. Vote required to adopt plan — Effective date.
If a majority of the votes cast on the question at the election favors the adoption of the city manager plan, the governing body shall declare the plan adopted and shall fix the date when the plan becomes effective. The date must be after the first regular meeting of the governing body in the month of July following the election.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 2; 1925 Supp., § 3770b2; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 3; R.C. 1943, § 40-1002; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 9; 1993, ch. 401, §§ 42, 43; 1997, ch. 108, § 23.
40-10-03. City manager — How selected — Qualifications — Compensation — Term.
The city manager shall be the chief administrative officer of the city and shall be chosen by the governing body solely on the basis of the person’s qualifications. The choice shall not be limited to the inhabitants of the city or state and a majority vote of the members of the governing body shall be necessary to make the choice. The city manager shall receive a compensation of not less than one thousand dollars a year and shall be chosen for an indefinite term.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 3; 1925 Supp., § 3770b3; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 4; R.C. 1943, § 40-1003.
Collateral References.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 163.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 355.
40-10-04. Removal of city manager — Summary proceedings — Charges brought — Suspension — Absence or disability of city manager.
The city manager may be removed from office summarily by the governing body at any time within six months after appointment. After that period, the city manager may be removed only pursuant to written charges made and filed with the city auditor by the executive officer or by some member of the governing body. Upon the filing of the charges if the city manager desires a hearing thereon, the city manager shall file a written demand for such hearing within three days after the notice of the filing of such charges has been served upon the city manager. In the absence of such demand, the city manager shall be deemed to have waived a hearing, but shall not be removed finally until a hearing is had or waived. Pending such hearing or the waiver thereof, the city manager may be suspended by the governing body. During the absence or disability of the city manager, the governing body shall designate some properly qualified person to perform the duties of the city manager’s office. The decision of the governing body on the selection or removal of a city manager or of a person to perform the duties of such office shall be final.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 3; 1925 Supp., § 3770b3; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 4; R.C. 1943, § 40-1004.
Collateral References.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 421, 422.
40-10-05. Powers of governing body.
The governing body shall have in addition to other powers granted by law the following powers:
- It may inquire into the conduct of any office, department, or agency of the city.
- It may by ordinance establish, change, and abolish offices, departments, and agencies, other than those required by law, and may add to or take away from the duties of the various offices, departments, and agencies.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 4; 1925 Supp., § 3770b4; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 5; R.C. 1943, § 40-1005; S.L. 1951, ch. 262, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-1005.
40-10-06. Duties of city manager.
The city manager shall:
- Be responsible to the governing body of the municipality for the proper administration of all of the affairs of the city.
- Prepare and submit to the governing body an annual preliminary budget as provided for under chapter 40-40, and shall be responsible for the administration of the final budget, subject to the control of the governing body as to changes in the same.
- Be responsible for law enforcement.
- Appoint and remove, subject to civil service regulations if in effect, all heads of administrative departments and employees of the city however, the city manager shall neither appoint nor remove the head of any department without first consulting with the governing body.
- Keep the governing body advised of the financial condition of the city and make such recommendations as may seem desirable.
- Be responsible for the purchase of all supplies, materials, and equipment for the operations of the city provided, that for any purchase the cost of which exceeds one thousand dollars, the governing body shall establish the procedure for purchasing the same.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 4; 1925 Supp., § 3770b4; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 5; R.C. 1943, § 40-1006; S.L. 1951, ch. 262, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-1006; S.L. 1971, ch. 391, § 1.
40-10-07. Conflict of powers and duties of city manager and other officers — Who to govern.
If the powers granted to a city manager by this chapter shall conflict with or shall be opposed to the powers or duties imposed upon or granted by law to the executive officer or governing body, the powers or duties imposed or granted by law to the executive officer or the governing body shall be deemed to be suspended for and during the period in which the city manager plan is in force in the city and during the employment of a city manager thereunder.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 4; 1925 Supp., § 3770b4; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 5; R.C. 1943, § 40-1007.
40-10-08. Election to determine question of retention of city manager plan — Procedure thereafter.
At any time after the city manager plan has been in force in any city for a period of five years or more, the governing body of the city may submit at any regular election the question of whether or not such plan shall be retained. If a petition signed by forty percent or more of the qualified electors of the city, as shown by the votes cast for the executive officer at the preceding city election, requesting the submission of such question is filed with the city auditor, the governing body shall submit such proposal to the qualified electors of the city at an election to be held within ninety days after the filing of such petition. The signatures to such petition need not be appended to a single paper, but each single paper so used shall clearly state the purpose of the petition at the top of the paper, and each signature shall have been placed thereon not more than ninety days prior to the date on which the petition is filed in the office of the city auditor. Upon each paper one of the qualified electors signing such petition shall, under oath before an officer competent to administer oaths, swear that that person witnessed the signing of each signature appearing on such paper and that each signature appearing upon such paper is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Each petition, in addition to the names of the signers, shall contain the name of the street and the number of the house in which each petitioner resides, the length of the petitioner’s residence in the state of North Dakota and in the city, and the date on which the petitioner signed the petition. Any petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw the petitioner’s name from a petition at any time prior to action by the governing body calling the election as provided herein. Such question shall not be submitted more than once in every five years. If a majority of the votes cast on the question at the election shall be against retaining the city manager plan, the city shall revert to the plan in force previous to the adoption of the city manager plan, and the provisions of this chapter shall not be applicable to such city except after another compliance with its terms. The governing body shall fix the date, not less than three months nor more than six months after an election at which the majority vote on the question is against the retention of the city manager plan, when such plan shall cease to be operative in the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1919, ch. 80, § 5; 1925 Supp., § 3770b5; S.L. 1933, ch. 172, § 6; R.C. 1943, § 40-1008; S.L. 1959, ch. 304, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 78; 1997, ch. 108, § 24.
CHAPTER 40-11 Ordinances
40-11-01. Enacting clause for ordinances.
The enacting clause of every ordinance adopted by a municipal corporation shall be: “Be it ordained by the _____________________________________________________________________ (governing body) of the city of _____________________________________________________________________ .” Such caption, however, may be omitted when the ordinances are published in book form or are revised and digested.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2147; R.C. 1899, § 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, § 2675; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 30; 1911, ch. 77, § 30; C.L. 1913, §§ 3596, 3800; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1101; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 120.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 105-122(4).
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 295-383.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 247-327.
Conclusiveness of declaration in ordinance of an emergency, 35 A.L.R.2d 586.
Municipal regulation of junk dealers as affected by method of enactment, 45 A.L.R.2d 1391, 1397.
Law Reviews.
Powers and Procedures of City and Village Governing Boards, 31 N.D. L. Rev. 137 (1955).
40-11-02. Procedure in passing ordinances.
All ordinances shall be read twice and the second reading and final passage shall not be had in less than one week after the first reading. After the first reading and before final passage, an ordinance may be amended. Except as otherwise specifically provided, a majority of all of the members of the governing body must concur in the passage of an ordinance and in the creation of any liability against the city and in expending or appropriating money.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, §§ 12, 16; R.C. 1895, §§ 2143, 2147; R.C. 1899, §§ 2143, 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 40, 44; R.C. 1905, §§ 2671, 2675; C.L. 1913, §§ 3592, 3596; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1102.
Notes to Decisions
Concurrence of a Majority.
The requirement of concurrence of a majority of all members applies only to the second reading and final passage. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 211 N.W.2d 399, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1973).
Passed Vote.
Since N.D.C.C. § 40-11-03 makes no provision for a passed vote, it is presumed that all members have the obligation of voting either for or against a proposed ordinance; and a passed vote is to be considered as a vote with the remaining majority, if a quorum is present. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 211 N.W.2d 399, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1973).
Collateral References.
Abstention from voting of member of municipal council present at session as affecting requisite voting majority, 63 A.L.R.3d 1072.
40-11-03. Yea and nay vote on passage — When required.
The yeas and nays shall be taken and entered on the journal of the governing body’s proceedings upon the passage of all ordinances and upon all propositions creating any liability against the city or providing for the expenditure or appropriation of money, and in all other cases at the request of any member.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 12; R.C. 1895, § 2143; R.C. 1899, § 2143; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 40; R.C. 1905, § 2671; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 46; 1911, ch. 77, § 46; C.L. 1913, §§ 3592, 3816; R.C. 1943, § 40-1103.
Notes to Decisions
- Abstentions.
- Amendment to Ordinance.
- Applicable Only to Cities.
- First and Second Reading.
- Liability of City.
- Mandatory Requirement.
- Passed Vote.
- Resolutions.
Abstentions.
Each member of the board, if present, is obligated to vote on a measure presented to the board; this section makes no provision for recording abstentions. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 211 N.W.2d 399, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1973).
Amendment to Ordinance.
An ordinance which is adopted with amendments by a yea and nay vote is not invalid, even though the amendments may have been adopted by a viva voce vote merely. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
Applicable Only to Cities.
This section is a part of the city charter, and is applicable only to cities. Ashley v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Ry., 37 N.D. 147, 163 N.W. 727, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1917).
First and Second Reading.
The requirement of concurrence of a majority of all members applies only to the second reading and final passage. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 211 N.W.2d 399, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1973).
Liability of City.
The employment of an attorney by a city should have been authorized or ratified by a yea and nay vote of the council to make the city liable for his compensation. Bosard v. Grand Forks, 13 N.D. 587, 102 N.W. 164, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 83 (N.D. 1904).
A police officer of a city has no power to make a binding contract for or create a contractual liability against the city. Trinty Hosp. Ass'n v. Minot, 76 N.W.2d 916, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1956).
Where, for a number of years, prisoners convicted of violations of city ordinances were accepted by the county jail, the use of the jail by the city was deemed to have been consented to by the county commissioners and the city was deemed to have impliedly contracted to pay for the maintenance of the prisoners. Grand Forks County v. Grand Forks, 123 N.W.2d 42, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1963).
Mandatory Requirement.
This provision is mandatory and not discretionary, and the journal must show the vote of each member of the city council on the passage of an ordinance. Pickton v. Fargo, 10 N.D. 469, 88 N.W. 90, 1901 N.D. LEXIS 63 (N.D. 1901), City of Grafton v. S. Paul, M. & M. Ry., 16 N.D. 313, 113 N.W. 598, 1907 N.D. LEXIS 59 (N.D. 1907), and Mitchell v. Parshall, 108 N.W.2d 12, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 65 (N.D. 1961).
Passed Vote.
Since N.D.C.C. § 40-11-03 makes no provision for a passed vote, it is presumed that all members have the obligation of voting either for or against a proposed ordinance; and a passed vote is to be considered as a vote with the remaining majority, if a quorum is present. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 211 N.W.2d 399, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1973).
Resolutions.
The yeas and nays need not be taken upon the passage of a resolution levying a general city tax. Shattuck v. Smith, 6 N.D. 56, 69 N.W. 5 (N.D. 1896).
The provision of this section requiring the yeas and nays to be taken and entered in the journal of the governing body of a city upon the passage of all ordinances does not apply to the passage of a resolution, in the absence of a request for such entry by a member of the governing body, where the resolution does not create a liability against the city or provide for the expenditure or appropriation of money. Mitchell v. Parshall, 108 N.W.2d 12, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 65 (N.D. 1961).
40-11-04. Ordinance required for the transfer of property.
Every municipality shall enact an ordinance providing for the conveyance, sale, lease, or disposal of personal and real property of the municipality. When the property to be disposed of is estimated by the governing body of the municipality to be of a value of less than two thousand five hundred dollars, the property may be sold at private sale upon the proper resolution of the governing body. In all other cases, the property may be sold only at public sale or as provided under section 40-11-04.2. This section and sections 40-11-04.1 and 40-11-04.2 do not apply to a lease by a municipality to the state, or any agency or institution of the state, of any waterworks, mains, and water distribution system and any equipment or appliances connected therewith and any real property related thereto pursuant to subsection 5 of section 40-33-01 or of any sewage system and all related property for the collection, treatment, purification, and disposal in a sanitary manner of sewage pursuant to section 40-34-01.2.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 12; R.C. 1895, § 2143; R.C. 1899, § 2143; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 40; R.C. 1905, § 2671; C.L. 1913, § 3592; R.C. 1943, § 40-1104; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 121; 1975, ch. 371, § 3; 1987, ch. 156, § 3; 2003, ch. 342, § 4.
Notes to Decisions
Low-Cost Housing.
Even though city failed to comply with requirements of this section in transferring property for use as low-cost housing, it exercised its powers in compliance with N.D.C.C. §§ 23-11-33 and 54-40-08 and therefore was not required to comply with this section. Dahl v. Grafton, 286 N.W.2d 774, 1979 N.D. LEXIS 322 (N.D. 1979).
40-11-04.1. Real property transfer requirements.
Upon resolution by the governing body of a city authorizing the public sale of real property, a notice containing a description of the property to be sold and designating the place where and the day and hour when the sale will be held shall be published in the city’s official newspaper as provided in section 40-01-09 once each week for two consecutive weeks with the last publication being at least ten days in advance of the date set for the sale. The notice shall specify whether the bids are to be received at auction or as sealed bids as determined by the governing body of the city. The property advertised shall be sold to the highest bidder if that person’s bid is deemed sufficient by a majority of the members of the governing body.
Source:
S.L. 1975, ch. 371, § 1; 1977, ch. 375, § 5.
Notes to Decisions
Disposal of Property.
Where the city did enact an ordinance pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 40-11-04, this section and N.D.C.C. § 40-11-04.2 and followed the procedures in that ordinance in selling the existing facilities, there was no error in the trial court’s determination that the city did dispose of the property pursuant to N.D.C.C. ch. 40-11, and in full compliance with that chapter’s requirements of notice, bidding, and all other requirements. Haugland v. Bismarck, 429 N.W.2d 449, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 1988).
40-11-04.2. Transfer of real property by nonexclusive listing agreements.
As an alternative to the procedure established under section 40-11-04.1, the governing body of a city may by resolution describe the real property of the city which is to be sold; provide a maximum rate of fee, compensation, or commission; and provide that the city reserves the right to reject any and all offers determined to be insufficient. After adoption of the resolution, the governing body of a city may engage licensed real estate brokers to attempt to sell the described property by way of nonexclusive listing agreements.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 156, § 4.
Notes to Decisions
Disposal of Property.
Where the city did enact an ordinance pursuant to N.D.C.C. §§ 40-11-04, 40-11-04.1 and this section and followed the procedures in that ordinance in selling the existing facilities, there was no error in the trial court’s determination that the city did dispose of the property pursuant to N.D.C.C. ch. 40-11, and in full compliance with that chapter’s requirements of notice, bidding, and all other requirements. Haugland v. Bismarck, 429 N.W.2d 449, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 1988).
40-11-05. Ordinances and resolutions adopted in council cities — Mayor’s veto power — Reconsideration after veto.
An ordinance or resolution adopted by the city council of a city operating under the council form of government is not enacted until the ordinance or resolution is approved by the mayor or passed over the mayor’s veto. An ordinance or resolution passed by the governing body of a city operating under the council form of government must be deposited in the office of the city auditor for the approval of the mayor. If the mayor approves the ordinance or resolution, the mayor shall sign the ordinance or resolution. An ordinance or resolution not approved by the mayor must be returned by the mayor with the mayor’s objections in writing to the next regular or special meeting of the council occurring not less than five days after the passage of the ordinance or resolution. The veto may extend to an entire ordinance or resolution or to any one or more items or appropriations contained in any ordinance or resolution making an appropriation. If a veto extends to only a part of an ordinance or resolution, the residue takes effect. If the mayor fails to return any ordinance or resolution with the mayor’s objections within the time specified in this section, the mayor is deemed to have approved the ordinance or resolution. Any veto of an ordinance or resolution may be overridden by the city council, if two-thirds of its members pass a motion to override the veto. Upon such action, the ordinance or resolution is effective notwithstanding the veto. The vote to pass an ordinance or resolution over the mayor’s veto must be taken by yeas and nays and entered in the journal.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2147; R.C. 1899, § 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, § 2675; C.L. 1913, § 3596; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1105; 2015, ch. 279, § 3, eff August 1, 2015.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 3 of chapter 279, S.L. 2015 became effective August 1, 2015.
40-11-06. Publication of ordinances.
The title and penalty clause of every ordinance imposing any penalty, fine, imprisonment, or forfeiture for a violation of its provisions, after the final adoption of the ordinance, shall be published in one issue of the official newspaper of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2147; R.C. 1899, § 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, § 2675; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 29; 1911, ch. 77, § 29; C.L. 1913, §§ 3596, 3799; S.L. 1917, ch. 74, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3799; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1106; S.L. 1983, ch. 82, § 77.
Cross-References.
Official newspaper of municipality, see § 40-01-09.
40-11-07. Effective date of ordinances.
Ordinances finally approved by the governing body of a municipality and which require publication shall take effect and be in force from and after the publication thereof unless otherwise expressly provided in the ordinance. Ordinances which do not require publication shall take effect and be in force from and after the final approval thereof unless otherwise expressly provided therein.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, § 2147; R.C. 1899, § 2147; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, § 2675; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 29; 1911, ch. 77, § 29; C.L. 1913, §§ 3596, 3799; S.L. 1917, ch. 74, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3799; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1107.
40-11-08. Ordinance book required — Ordinance book and certified copies of ordinances as evidence.
Each municipality shall keep an ordinance book. The city auditor shall record in such book all ordinances finally passed and approved, and when any ordinance has been published, the city auditor shall record therein the affidavit of publication or of posting. The ordinance book, or copies of ordinances as recorded therein, certified by the city auditor, shall be received as evidence without further proof. If the ordinances of a municipality have been printed in book or pamphlet form by authority of the governing body of the municipality, such book or pamphlet shall be received as evidence of the existence of the ordinances therein contained.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 57; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 3, § 16; R.C. 1895, §§ 2147, 2417; R.C. 1899, §§ 2147, 2417; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 44; R.C. 1905, §§ 2675, 2925; C.L. 1913, §§ 3596, 3931; S.L. 1935, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1108; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 122.
Notes to Decisions
Proof of Passage.
An ordinance may be proved as to its contents as well as to its passage by the introduction in evidence of the original record of such ordinance properly identified as such. City of Grafton v. St. Paul M. & M. Ry., 16 N.D. 313, 113 N.W. 598 (1907).
40-11-09. Enactment and revision of ordinances.
The executive officer of a municipality may appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the governing body of the municipality, one or more competent persons to prepare and submit to the governing body, for its adoption or rejection, an ordinance for the revision or amendment of existing ordinances or for the enactment of new and additional ordinances for such municipality. The attorney for the municipality, if it has an attorney, shall be appointed as one of the persons to prepare and submit such ordinance. The compensation of the revisor or revisors, including that of the attorney, shall be determined by the governing body and shall be paid out of the municipal treasury. Such revision, including any additional ordinances and amendments to existing ordinances contained therein, may be passed as a single ordinance and may be published in pamphlet or book form, by and under the authority of the governing body of the municipality, and shall be valid and effective without publication in a newspaper or posting.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 15; R.C. 1895, § 2129; R.C. 1899, § 2129; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 26; R.C. 1905, § 2657; S.L. 1913, ch. 77, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3578; R.C. 1943, § 40-1109.
Notes to Decisions
Amendments to Ordinances.
This section requires that amendments to ordinances be accomplished by means of another ordinance rather than by resolution; where the requirements of N.D.C.C. §§ 40-11-01 and 40-11-02 were not met, resolution was ineffective as an amendment to city’s existing liquor licensing ordinances. Mini Mart v. City of Minot, 347 N.W.2d 131, 1984 N.D. LEXIS 274 (N.D. 1984).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 106(1-4), 114.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 297, 370-373.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 255-263, 291-293.
40-11-09.1. Presumption of regular adoption, enactment, or amendment of resolution or ordinance.
Three years after the adoption or amendment of a resolution or the enactment or amendment of an ordinance by the governing body of a city it is conclusively presumed that the resolution or ordinance was adopted, enacted, or amended and published as required by law.
Source:
S.L. 1993, ch. 95, § 2.
40-11-10. Action for violation of ordinance in corporate name — Previous prosecution, recovery, or acquittal no defense.
Any action brought to recover any fine, to enforce any penalty, or to punish any violation of an ordinance of any municipality shall be brought in the corporate name of the municipality as plaintiff. A prosecution, recovery, or acquittal for the violation of any such ordinance may not constitute a defense to any other prosecution of the same person for any other violation of any such ordinance, notwithstanding that the different claims for relief existed at the time of the previous prosecution and if united, would not have exceeded the jurisdiction of the court.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2149; R.C. 1899, § 2149; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 50; R.C. 1905, § 2681; C.L. 1913, § 3602; R.C. 1943, § 40-1110; S.L. 1985, ch. 82, § 104.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 632-645.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 375, 376, 378-383.
40-11-11. Summons to issue on violation of ordinance — When warrant of arrest to issue.
In all actions for the violation of an ordinance, the first process shall be a summons, but a warrant for the arrest of the offender shall be issued upon the sworn complaint of any person that an ordinance has been violated and that the person making the complaint has reasonable grounds to believe the person charged is guilty of such violation. Any person arrested under a warrant shall be taken without unnecessary delay before the proper officer to be tried for the alleged offense.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 4; R.C. 1895, § 2151; R.C. 1899, § 2151; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 52; R.C. 1905, § 2683; C.L. 1913, § 3604; R.C. 1943, § 40-1111.
Notes to Decisions
Special Statute.
This section provides for alternative methods of commencing actions and, being a special statute, it prevails over the general statutes. Kist v. Butts, 71 N.D. 436, 1 N.W.2d 612, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 76 (N.D. 1942).
40-11-12. Commitment of guilty person for nonpayment of fines or costs.
Any person upon whom any fine or costs, or both, has been imposed for violation of a municipal ordinance may, after hearing, be committed upon order of the court to jail or other place provided by the municipality for the incarceration of offenders until the fine or costs, or both, are fully paid or discharged by labor as provided in section 40-18-12. The court may not commit a person under this section when the sole reason for the person’s nonpayment of fines or costs, or both, is the person’s indigency. An order of commitment under this section shall not be for a period in excess of thirty days. As used in this section, “fine” does not include a fee established pursuant to subsection 2 of section 40-05-06.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 4; R.C. 1895, § 2151; R.C. 1899, § 2151; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 52; R.C. 1905, § 2683; C.L. 1913, § 3604; R.C. 1943, § 40-1112; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 123; 1975, ch. 106, § 454.
Cross-References.
Limitations on city fines and penalties, see § 40-05-06.
Notes to Decisions
Commitment Order.
Where a commitment order pursuant to this section constituted revocation of a sentence which had been suspended conditioned upon payment of a fine, the order was appealable under the provisions of N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06. City of Kenmare v. Murray, 404 N.W.2d 513, 1987 N.D. LEXIS 309 (N.D. 1987).
A county court’s review of an order issued under this section would include questions involving a defendant’s failure to meet the conditions of his suspended sentence, issues concerning the possibility that the defendant is indigent, and consideration of any information in mitigation of punishment the defendant may present to the county court. City of Kenmare v. Murray, 404 N.W.2d 513, 1987 N.D. LEXIS 309 (N.D. 1987).
Liability of City.
Where for a number of years, prisoners convicted of violations of city ordinances were accepted by the county jail, the use of the jail by the city was deemed to have been consented to by the county commissioners and the city was deemed to have impliedly contracted to pay for the maintenance of the prisoners. Grand Forks County v. Grand Forks, 123 N.W.2d 42, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 104 (N.D. 1963).
Collateral References.
Right of one governmental subdivision to sue another such subdivision for damages, 11 A.L.R.5th 630.
40-11-13. Fines and forfeitures for violation of ordinances paid into treasury.
All fines, penalties, and forfeitures collected for offenses against the ordinances of a city, including those fines, penalties, and forfeitures collected as a result of a judgment of a district court rendered pursuant to section 40-18-19, must be paid into the city’s treasury at such time and in such manner as may be prescribed by ordinance.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 3, art. 10, § 1, art. 18, § 4; 1889, ch. 33, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2150, 2193, 2336; R.C. 1899, §§ 2150, 2193, 2336; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 51, 90, 190; R.C. 1905, §§ 2682, 2723, 2830; C.L. 1913, §§ 3603, 3647, 3759; R.C. 1943, § 40-1113; S.L. 1981, ch. 412, § 1; 1983, ch. 82, § 78; 1987, ch. 375, § 3; 1993, ch. 326, § 154.
CHAPTER 40-12 Initiative and Referendum
40-12-01. Initiative and referendum apply only in commission and modern council cities.
The provisions of this chapter relative to the initiating and referring of municipal ordinances shall apply only in cities operating under the commission and modern council system of government.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, §§ 2, 3; 1913, ch. 79, §§ 2, 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3836, 3837; R.C. 1943, § 40-1201; S.L. 1965, ch. 285, § 11; 1993, ch. 401, § 44.
Notes to Decisions
In General.
Section 40-12-01 et seq. expressly grants the power to city voters to initiate municipal ordinances. The breadth of that power is limited only by procedural requirements that the petition and petitioners must meet. Christianson v. Bismarck, 476 N.W.2d 688, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 175 (N.D. 1991).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 108-108.11.
42 Am. Jur. 2d, Initiative and Referendum, §§ 10-12.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 311-327.
Power of legislative body to amend, repeal, or abrogate initiative or referendum measure, or to enact measure defeated on referendum, 33 A.L.R.2d 1118.
Conclusiveness of declaration in ordinance of an emergency, 35 A.L.R.2d 586.
Adoption of zoning ordinance or amendment thereto through initiative process, 72 A.L.R.3d 991.
Adoption of zoning ordinance or amendment thereto as subject of referendum, 72 A.L.R.3d 1030.
40-12-02. Submission of proposed ordinance by petition — Filed with city auditor — Request in petition.
Any proposed ordinance may be submitted to the governing body of the municipality by a petition signed by qualified electors thereof equal in number to fifteen percent of the votes cast for all candidates for the executive officer at the preceding regular municipal election. The petition must be filed in the city auditor’s office and must contain a request that the ordinance set out in the petition be submitted to a vote of the qualified electors of the city if it is not passed by the governing body of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1202; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 79.
Notes to Decisions
Construction.
On its face, this section, authorizes “any” ordinance to be submitted to the governing body of the municipality, subject to certain procedural requirements. Christianson v. Bismarck, 476 N.W.2d 688, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 175 (N.D. 1991).
40-12-03. Requirements of petitions for initiative and referendum.
Only qualified electors of the city may sign petitions provided for in this chapter. Each petition, in addition to the names of the petitioners, must contain the name of the street upon, and the number of the house in, which each petitioner resides. It must also be accompanied by the affidavit of one or more qualified electors of the city stating that the signers were qualified electors of the city at the time of signing and the number of signers upon the petition at the time when the affidavit was made.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 4; 1913, ch. 79, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3838; R.C. 1943, § 40-1203; S.L. 1985, ch. 457, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Nonconforming Petition.
A petition for recall of a city commissioner was not rendered invalid because the signers failed to add to their signatures their ages and length of residence in the city. State ex rel. Gran v. Bratsberg, 54 N.D. 380, 210 N.W. 4, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 158 (N.D. 1926).
40-12-04. Signatures to petition — Requirements — Oath — Withdrawal.
The signatures to a petition to initiate or refer an ordinance need not all be appended to one paper. One of the signers of each paper shall make an oath before an officer competent to administer oaths that the person believes the statements in the paper to be true and that each signature to the paper is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Any petitioner may withdraw that petitioner’s name from a petition within five days after the date of the filing of the petition with the city auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1204.
40-12-05. City auditor to determine sufficiency of initiative petition — Certificate attached to petition.
Within ten days after the filing of a petition to initiate an ordinance, the city auditor shall examine the petition and ascertain from the voters’ register whether or not the petition is signed by the requisite number of qualified electors. The governing body of the municipality shall allow such extra help for the examination of the petition as it deems necessary. The city auditor shall attach to the petition the city auditor’s certificate showing the result of the examination and if the petition is insufficient, the city auditor shall state in the city auditor’s certificate the reasons therefor. If the city auditor’s certificate shows the petition to be insufficient, it may be amended within ten days from the date of the certificate. Within ten days after any such amendment, the city auditor shall make an examination of the amended petition, and if the city auditor’s certificate attached thereto shall show the amended petition to be insufficient, it shall be returned to the person filing the same without prejudice to the filing of a new petition to the same effect. If the petition is sufficient, the city auditor shall submit it to the governing body of the municipality without delay.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1205; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 80.
40-12-06. Duty of governing body after receiving petition for proposed ordinance.
After receiving the petition for the initiation of a proposed ordinance, the governing body of the municipality shall:
- Pass the ordinance without alteration within twenty days after the attachment of the auditor’s certificate to the accompanying petition;
- Call a special election, unless a general city election is fixed within ninety days thereafter, and submit to the vote of the qualified electors of the municipality the initiated ordinance without alteration; or
- If the petition is signed by not less than twenty-five percent of the qualified electors as defined in section 40-12-02, pass the ordinance without change within twenty days after the filing of the petition or submit the initiated ordinance at the next general municipal election, if the election occurs not more than thirty days after the city auditor’s certificate of sufficiency is attached to the petition, and if no general municipal election is to be held within thirty days after the city auditor’s certificate of sufficiency is attached to the petition, it shall call a special election.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1206; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 81.
Notes to Decisions
City’s Options Limited.
This section limits the options of the city, when it receives a proposed ordinance, to either pass the ordinance or submit it to a vote of the electorate. Christianson v. Bismarck, 476 N.W.2d 688, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 175 (N.D. 1991).
Time of Vote.
Under subsection (2) of this section, the city is authorized to place the proposed ordinance on the ballot of the next general election if that election occurs within 90 days of the receipt of the city auditor’s certification unless according to section 40-21-02, the next general election is not scheduled until after the 90-day limitation intended by the legislature. Christianson v. Bismarck, 476 N.W.2d 688, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 175 (N.D. 1991).
Review Power of Governing Body.
Board of city commissioners has no power to review the determination of city auditor that a petition is signed by a sufficient number of qualified electors. State ex rel. Gran v. Bratsberg, 54 N.D. 380, 210 N.W. 4, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 158 (N.D. 1926).
40-12-07. Adoption of proposed ordinance — Effect — Repeal or amendment of initiated ordinance.
If a majority of the qualified electors voting on an initiated ordinance vote in favor thereof, it shall become a valid and binding ordinance of the municipality. Any ordinance proposed by a petition and adopted by a vote of the people cannot be repealed or amended except by a vote of the people so long as the municipality remains under the commission system of government.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1207.
40-12-08. Petition to refer ordinance — Suspension of ordinance — Requirements of petition.
An ordinance which has been adopted by the governing body of a municipality may be referred to the qualified electors of the municipality by a petition protesting against such ordinance. Such petition shall be signed by qualified electors of the municipality equal to at least ten percent of the entire vote cast for all candidates for executive officer of the municipality at the preceding regular municipal election and shall be presented to the governing body of the municipality within ten days and before four p.m. on the tenth day after the ordinance described in the petition became effective. If a petition is mailed to the governing body of the municipality, it shall be in the possession of such body before four p.m. on the tenth day after the ordinance became effective. Unless the ordinance protested against was passed by a four-fifths vote of the members of the governing body of the municipality for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety and contains a statement of its urgency, it shall be suspended upon the filing of the petition. The petition provided for in this section shall be in all respects in accordance with the provisions of sections 40-12-02, 40-12-03, and 40-12-04, except as to the number of signers required, and shall be examined and certified by the city auditor in all respects as provided in section 40-12-05.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 3; 1913, ch. 79, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3837; R.C. 1943, § 40-1208; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 97; 1985, ch. 235, § 82.
40-12-09. Referred measure — Submission — Result of election.
When a referendum petition is filed, the governing body of the municipality shall reconsider the ordinance described therein, and if it is not entirely repealed, the governing body shall submit it to the vote of the qualified electors of the municipality at the next regular municipal election or at a special election to be called for that purpose as provided in section 40-12-06. The ordinance shall not go into effect or become operative unless a majority of the qualified electors voting on the same shall vote in favor thereof. If the referred ordinance was not suspended by the filing of the referendum petition, it no longer shall be effective if it is disapproved by a majority vote of the qualified electors voting on the same.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 3; 1913, ch. 79, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3837; R.C. 1943, § 40-1209; S.L. 1985, ch. 235, § 83.
40-12-10. No limitation on number of ordinances that may be voted on at one election — Limitation on special elections.
Any number of proposed or referred ordinances may be voted on at the same election in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. There shall be not more than one special election in any period of six months for such purposes.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1210.
40-12-11. Publication of proposed or referred ordinance or proposition before election.
The city auditor shall cause any ordinance or proposition to be submitted to the electors under this chapter to be published once in each newspaper published in the municipality. The publication shall be made not more than twenty days nor less than five days before the submission of the ordinance or proposition to a vote.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1211.
40-12-12. Form of ballots to be used in voting on initiated or referred ordinance.
The ballot to be used in voting upon an initiated ordinance shall be in substantially the following form:
Shall an initiated ordinance relating to (stating the nature of the proposed ordinance) be adopted? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
The ballot to be used in voting upon a referred ordinance shall be in substantially the following form:
Shall ordinance no. relating to (stating the nature of the proposed ordinance) approved by the board of city commissioners be approved? Yes ⎭ No ⎭
Click to view
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1212.
40-12-13. Propositions submitted for repeal or amendment to initiated or referred ordinance — Election — Vote required.
The governing body of the municipality may submit a proposition for the repeal of or an amendment to an ordinance adopted under the provisions of this chapter. The proposition shall be voted upon at any succeeding regular municipal election. If the proposition submitted receives a majority of the votes cast thereon at such election, the ordinance shall be repealed or amended, as the case may be.
Source:
S.L. 1911, ch. 67, § 2; 1913, ch. 79, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 3836; R.C. 1943, § 40-1213.
CHAPTER 40-13 General Provisions Governing Officers in Municipalities
40-13-01. Qualifications of elective and appointive officers.
A person is not eligible to hold an elective municipal office unless that person is a qualified elector of the municipality and has been a resident of the municipality for at least nine months preceding the election. A person is not eligible to hold an appointive office unless that person is a citizen of the United States. A person in default to the municipality is not eligible to any office.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 7; R.C. 1895, § 2161; R.C. 1899, § 2161; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 62; R.C. 1905, § 2693; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 17; 1911, ch. 77, § 17; 1913, ch. 76, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3617, 3787; R.C. 1943, § 40-1301.
Cross-References.
Blanks and records, officer to provide for office, see § 44-04-16.
Commission form cities, see ch. 40-15.
Council form cities, see ch. 40-14.
Defense and indemnity of claim against employee by political subdivision, see § 32-12.1-04.
Deputies, authority, see § 1-01-11.
Examination of records of officers, see § 44-04-15.
Fire chief or executive officers report fire to fire marshal, compensation, see §§ 18-01-06, 18-01-08.
Manager plan cities, see ch. 40-10.
Workers compensation, application to officers and employees, volunteer firemen and civil defense trainees, see §§ 65-01-02, 65-06-02.
Notes to Decisions
Residency Requirement.
Although mayor of Medora had purchased a home in Bismarck, his children attended Bismarck schools, and he was absent from Medora much of the time, he satisfied the residency requirement of this section to be mayor of Medora where there was other evidence to establish that he maintained an actual and legal residence in Medora. Dietz v. Medora, 333 N.W.2d 702, 1983 N.D. LEXIS 266 (N.D. 1983).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 137-142.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions §§ 311-327.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 337-349.
Taxpayer’s capacity to maintain suit to enjoin submission of initiative, referendum, or recall measure to voters, 6 A.L.R.2d 557.
Injunctive relief against submission of constitutional amendment, statute, municipal charter, or municipal ordinance, on ground that proposed action would be unconstitutional, 19 A.L.R.2d 519.
Validity of requirement that candidate or public officer have been resident of governmental unit for specified period, 65 A.L.R.3d 1048.
Construction and Application of Statutes and Ordinances Concerning Establishment of Residency, as Condition for Running for Municipal Office. 74 A.L.R.6th 209.
Construction and Application of Statutes and Ordinances Concerning Establishment of Residency, as Condition for Running for Municipal Office. 74 A.L.R.6th 209.
40-13-02. Bonds of city officials — Requirements — Approvals — Additional bonds.
The auditor, municipal judge, assessor, and the city manager of any city, and such other officers as the governing body may direct, before entering upon the discharge of the duties of their respective offices, shall execute and deliver to the city their separate bonds payable to the city, conditioned for the honest and faithful performance of their official duties. The bond must be in an amount fixed by the governing body of the city. The bond of the auditor must be set by resolution of the governing body of the city at a regular meeting in June of each year in an amount at least equal to twenty-five percent of the average amount of money that has been subject to the auditor’s control during the preceding fiscal year, as determined by the total of the daily balances of the auditor for the calendar year divided by the figure three hundred or the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars whichever is least. All official bonds must be approved by the executive officer of the city and filed in the office of the city auditor. The bonds must conform to the law applicable to the bonds of state officers and employees except that no personal surety may be accepted on any bond. A city may not pay the premium on any bond except a bond written in the state bonding fund or a bond procured to replace a bond canceled by the state bonding fund. The governing body at any time may require new and additional bonds of any officer.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 28; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, §§ 5, 12; 1893, ch. 35, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2159, 2166, 2371; R.C. 1899, §§ 2159, 2166, 2371; S.L. 1901, ch. 42, §§ 1, 2; 1905, ch. 62, §§ 60, 67; R.C. 1905, §§ 2691, 2698, 2715, 2716, 2870; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 37; 1911, ch. 77, § 37; C.L. 1913, §§ 3615, 3622, 3639, 3640, 3807, 3869; S.L. 1915, ch. 72, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3807; S.L. 1933, ch. 171, §§ 1 to 3; R.C. 1943, § 40-1302; S.L. 1945, ch. 254, § 1; 1957, ch. 279, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-1302; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 124; 1981, ch. 320, § 95; 1991, ch. 442, § 10.
Cross-References.
Official bonds, see §§ 44-01-11, 44-01-12, and ch. 26.1-21.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 145.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 215.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 359.
Public officer’s bond as subject to forfeiture for malfeasance in office, 4 A.L.R.2d 1348.
Personal liability on bond of policeman, sheriff, or other peace officer, for negligently causing personal injury or death, 60 A.L.R.2d 873.
40-13-03. Oaths of municipal officers.
Every person elected or appointed to any municipal office, before the person enters upon the discharge of the duties thereof, shall take and subscribe the oath of office prescribed for civil officers, and, except in the case of the auditor, shall file the same with the city auditor within ten days after notice of the election or appointment has been given. The oath of the city auditor shall be filed in the office of the auditor of the county in which the municipality is located. Refusal to take the oath of office, as required by this section, shall also be deemed a refusal to serve and, therefore, a failure to qualify for the office pursuant to section 44-02-01.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 19; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2159, 2362; R.C. 1899, §§ 2159, 2362; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 60; R.C. 1905, §§ 2691, 2861; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 36; 1911, ch. 77, § 36; C.L. 1913, §§ 3615, 3806, 3858; S.L. 1933, ch. 171, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-1303; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 125; 1999, ch. 208, § 5.
Cross-References.
Oath of civil officers, see § 44-01-05.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 144.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 215.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 359.
40-13-04. Salaries of officers and employees fixed by ordinance — Diminution of officers’ salaries during term prohibited.
Except when otherwise provided by law, any officer or employee of a city is entitled to receive the salary, fees, or other compensation fixed by ordinance or resolution. After having been once fixed, the salary of an officer may not be diminished to take effect during the term for which the officer was elected or appointed.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 44; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 12; 1893, ch. 35, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2166, 2391; R.C. 1899, §§ 2166, 2391; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 67; R.C. 1905, §§ 2698, 2890; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 32; 1911, ch. 77, § 32; C.L. 1913, §§ 3622, 3802, 3895; S.L. 1943, ch. 182, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-1304; S.L. 1995, ch. 387, § 1.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Acceptance of Lower Salary.
The acceptance by a marshal of less than his legal salary on bills rendered by him amounts to an adjudication of his claim. O'Hara v. Park River, 1 N.D. 279, 47 N.W. 380, 1890 N.D. LEXIS 36 (N.D. 1890).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 161-165.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 225-229, 231-234.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 372-390.
40-13-05. Officers not to be interested in contracts or work of municipality — Exception.
Except as otherwise provided by law, no municipal officer, in a municipality having a population of ten thousand or more according to the last federal decennial census, shall be directly or indirectly interested in:
- Any contract, work, or business of the municipality;
- The sale of any article the expense, price, or consideration of which is paid from the municipal treasury or by any assessment levied by any act or ordinance; or
- The purchase of any real estate or other property belonging to the municipality or which shall be sold for taxes or assessments or by virtue of any process issued in any suit brought by the municipality.
Provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be applicable if unanimously approved by the other members of the governing body of the political subdivision by a finding unanimously adopted by such other members and entered in the official minutes of the governing body, to be necessary for the reason that the services or property obtained are not otherwise available at equal cost.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 8; R.C. 1895, § 2162; R.C. 1899, § 2162; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 63; R.C. 1905, § 2694; C.L. 1913, § 3618; R.C. 1943, § 40-1305; S.L. 1957, ch. 277, § 3; 1957 Supp., § 40-1305; S.L. 1959, ch. 323, § 3; 1973, ch. 325, § 1.
Cross-References.
Interest of public officer in public contract prohibited, see § 48-02-12.
Preference given to North Dakota bidders and sellers, see N.D.C.C. § 44-08-01.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Effect of Violation.
A violation of a statute providing that no member of the city council should be interested in a city contract would not defeat a tax levied for the purpose of making payments under contract with city. Roberts v. First Nat'l Bank, 8 N.D. 504, 79 N.W. 1049, 1899 N.D. LEXIS 40 (N.D. 1899).
A contract for the purchase of land which the purchaser was induced to enter into by the promise of the vendor, who was mayor of the city in which the land was situated, that the city would buy gravel thereon for use for city improvements, was void. Emanuel v. Engst, 54 N.D. 141, 208 N.W. 840, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 162 (N.D. 1925).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 231.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 252-258.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 906-908.
40-13-05.1. Municipal officers — Contracts — Disclosure required — Penalty.
A municipal officer may not refuse or fail to disclose to the governing board of which that person is a member any personal interest, direct or indirect, in any contract requiring the expenditure of municipal funds. Any person who violates this section is guilty of an infraction and is, in addition, subject to removal from office.
Source:
S.L. 1977, ch. 377, §§ 1, 2.
40-13-06. Penalty for illegal interest in contract of municipality — Contract void. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 106, § 673.
40-13-07. Office deemed vacant on removal from municipality or failure to qualify.
When any officer removes from a municipality or refuses or neglects for ten days after official notification of that person’s appointment to qualify and enter upon the discharge of the duties of the office, the office shall be deemed vacant.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 2, § 5, art. 13, § 11; R.C. 1895, §§ 2119, 2260; R.C. 1899, §§ 2119, 2260; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 16, 118; R.C. 1905, §§ 2647, 2751; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 33, 36; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 33, 36; C.L. 1913, §§ 3568, 3675, 3803, 3806; S.L. 1935, ch. 193, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1307.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 143.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 479, 489.
40-13-08. Vacancy existing in appointive office — How filled.
Whenever a vacancy occurs in an appointive office, the same proceedings shall be had to fill such vacancy as are provided for in case of an appointment in the first instance.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 33; 1911, ch. 77, § 33; C.L. 1913, § 3803; S.L. 1935, ch. 193, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1308.
40-13-09. Vacancies to be filled for unexpired term.
Unless otherwise specifically provided in this title, every person elected or appointed to fill a vacancy in a municipal office shall hold the office and discharge the duties thereof for the unexpired term.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 35; 1911, ch. 77, § 35; C.L. 1913, § 3805; R.C. 1943, § 40-1309.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 149.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 368.
40-13-10. Delivery of property, books, and other effects to successor in office.
Within five days after notification and request, any officer of a municipality whose term has expired shall deliver to the person’s successor in office all property, books, and effects of every description in the person’s possession belonging to the municipality or pertaining to the person’s office. Upon the person’s refusal to deliver such property, books, and other effects, the person shall be liable for all damages caused thereby and subject to a penalty prescribed by ordinance.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 29; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 6; R.C. 1895, §§ 2160, 2372; R.C. 1899, §§ 2160, 2372; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 61; R.C. 1905, §§ 2692, 2871; C.L. 1913, §§ 3616, 3870; R.C. 1943, § 40-1310.
40-13-11. Additional duties, powers, and privileges of officers may be defined by ordinance.
The duties, powers, and privileges of all officers of every character in any way connected with a municipal government, not defined in this title, shall be defined by the governing body. The definition by this title of the duties of municipal officers shall not preclude the governing body from defining by ordinance further and additional duties to be performed by any such officer.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 49; R.C. 1905, § 2680; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 45; 1911, ch. 77, § 45; C.L. 1913, §§ 3601, 3815; R.C. 1943, § 40-1311.
40-13-12. Municipal officers liable to criminal prosecution — Fine — Removal from office. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 106, § 673.
40-13-13. Nepotism by city officials restricted.
The head of an executive or administrative department of a city may not appoint that individual’s spouse, son, daughter, brother, or sister to any position under the control or direction of that individual, unless the appointment has previously been approved by the governing body of the city.
Source:
S.L. 2005, ch. 347, § 1.
Effective Date.
This section became effective August 1, 2005.
CHAPTER 40-14 Officers in Council Cities, General
40-14-01. Officers to be elected in council cities.
The following officers must be elected in each city operating under the council form of government:
- A mayor.
- The council members required under sections 40-08-03 and 40-08-04.
Each city operating under the council form of government may choose to have a municipal judge who is elected.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 1; 1889, ch. 33, § 3; R.C. 1895, § 2154; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 3; R.C. 1899, § 2154; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 55; R.C. 1905, § 2686; C.L. 1913, § 3610; S.L. 1943, ch. 183, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1401; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 13; 1965, ch. 286, § 20; 1973, ch. 320, § 4; 1981, ch. 413, § 1; 1991, ch. 440, § 15.
Cross-References.
City board of equalization, see ch. 57-11.
Municipal judges, see ch. 40-18.
40-14-02. Terms of elective officers.
The terms of office of the mayor and council members are provided in chapter 40-08. All other elective officers in a city operating under the council form of government shall hold their respective offices for four years and until their successors are elected and qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2155; R.C. 1899, § 2155; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 56; R.C. 1905, § 2687; C.L. 1913, § 3611; S.L. 1931, ch. 203, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1402; S.L. 1969, ch. 373, § 1; 1991, ch. 440, § 16.
40-14-03. When term of elective officer begins.
Under the city council form of government, the term of each elective officer commences on the fourth Tuesday of June of the year in which the officer is elected.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 10; R.C. 1895, § 2259; R.C. 1899, § 2259; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 117; R.C. 1905, § 2750; C.L. 1913, § 3674; R.C. 1943, § 40-1403; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 11.
40-14-04. Appointive officers in council cities — Appointment of more than one assessor.
-
The mayor, with the approval of the city council, shall appoint the following officers:
- A city auditor;
- A city assessor;
- A city attorney;
- A city engineer; and
- Such other officers as the city council deems necessary and expedient.
- The city assessor shall be appointed at the first meeting of the city council in September of each odd-numbered year. If the city council of a city containing five thousand or more inhabitants shall declare, by resolution, that it is necessary to appoint more than one assessor, the mayor, with the approval of the council, may appoint one or two additional city assessors.
- The city council, including a city council under the modern council form of government, by a majority vote may dispense with any appointive office and provide that the duties of that office be performed by other officers.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 3, art. 9, § 2; 1889, ch. 28, § 1; 1893, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2156, 2157, 2185; R.C. 1899, §§ 2156, 2157, 2185; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 57, 58, 85; R.C. 1905, §§ 2688, 2689, 2718; C.L. 1913, §§ 3612, 3613, 3642; R.C. 1943, § 40-1404; S.L. 1993, ch. 401, § 45.
Notes to Decisions
Appointment of Assistant Attorneys.
The mayor and council may appoint attorneys to assist the city attorney, and are not required to select assistants from among resident lawyers. Scott v. Jamestown, 56 N.D. 454, 217 N.W. 668, 1928 N.D. LEXIS 231 (N.D. 1928).
40-14-05. Term of appointive officers.
The term of all appointive officers of a city operating under the council form of government commences on the first day of July succeeding their appointment unless otherwise provided by ordinance, and the officers shall hold their respective offices for two years, and until their successors are appointed and qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 4; R.C. 1895, § 2158; R.C. 1899, § 2158; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 59; R.C. 1905, § 2690; C.L. 1913, § 3614; R.C. 1943, § 40-1405; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 12.
Notes to Decisions
Right to Payment of Salary.
A city assessor, in the absence of waiver or estoppel, could recover salary from the city from the period of his wrongful dismissal, although the salary for such period had been paid to a de facto officer. Ness v. Fargo, 64 N.D. 231, 251 N.W. 843, 1933 N.D. LEXIS 269 (N.D. 1933).
40-14-06. Officers commissioned by warrant — City auditor to receive certificate of appointment.
All officers elected or appointed, except the city auditor, council members, and mayor, must be commissioned by warrant signed by the auditor and the mayor or president of the city council. The mayor shall issue a certificate of appointment to the auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 6; R.C. 1895, § 2160; R.C. 1899, § 2160; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 61; R.C. 1905, § 2692; C.L. 1913, § 3616; R.C. 1943, § 40-1406; S.L. 1973, ch. 80, § 12; 1991, ch. 440, § 17.
40-14-07. Holding of other offices by city auditor prohibited. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 372, § 1.
CHAPTER 40-15 Officers in Commission Cities, General
40-15-01. Officers to be elected in commission cities.
The following officers shall be elected in each city operating under the commission system of government:
- A president of the board of city commissioners.
- Four city commissioners.
Each city operating under the commission system of government may choose to have a municipal judge who shall be elected.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 13; 1911, ch. 77, § 13; C.L. 1913, § 3783; R.C. 1943, § 40-1501; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 12; 1965, ch. 286, § 19; 1981, ch. 413, § 2.
Cross-References.
City board of equalization, see ch. 57-11.
Municipal judges, see ch. 40-18.
40-15-02. Terms of elective officers.
The terms of office of the president of the board of city commissioners and of each commissioner shall be as provided in chapter 40-09. The municipal judge shall hold office for four years and until the judge’s successor is elected and qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 5, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2155; R.C. 1899, § 2155; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 56; R.C. 1905, § 2687; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 18; 1911, ch. 77, § 18; C.L. 1913, §§ 3611, 3788; S.L. 1931, ch. 203, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1502; S.L. 1965, ch. 286, § 18.
40-15-03. When term of elective officers begins.
The term of each elective officer in a city operating under the commission system of government commences on the fourth Tuesday in June of the year in which the officer is elected.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 18; 1911, ch. 77, § 18; C.L. 1913, § 3788; R.C. 1943, § 40-1503; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 13.
40-15-04. Extension of terms of officers in commission cities elected to terms expiring in 1943 and 1945. [Repealed]
Repealed by omission from this code.
40-15-05. Appointive officers in commission cities — Right to dispense with offices.
At the first meeting after the qualification of its members, or as soon thereafter as possible, the board of city commissioners shall appoint the following officers:
- A treasurer;
- An auditor;
- An attorney;
- One or more assessors;
- A city health officer who shall be a physician;
- A street commissioner;
- A chief of the fire department;
- A chief of police;
- One or more police officers;
- A city engineer;
- A board of public works; and
- Such other officers or boards as the board of city commissioners may deem necessary.
The board of city commissioners by a majority vote may dispense with any appointive office and provide that the duties thereof shall be performed by other officers or boards, by the board of city commissioners, or by a committee or committees thereof.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 13, 31; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 13, 31; C.L. 1913, §§ 3783, 3801; R.C. 1943, § 40-1505.
40-15-06. Term of appointive officers.
The terms of all appointive officers of a city operating under the commission system of government commences on the first day of July succeeding their appointment unless otherwise provided by ordinance, and the officers shall hold their respective offices for the term provided by ordinance, and until their respective successors are qualified.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 18; 1911, ch. 77, § 18; C.L. 1913, § 3788; R.C. 1943, § 40-1506; S.L. 1991, ch. 442, § 14.
40-15-07. Appointive officers — Removal upon hearing — Suspension — Appointment and removal of temporary officer.
Any person appointed to any office of a city operating under the commission system of government and any employee of the city may be removed by a majority vote of all the members of the board of city commissioners, but no officer or employee shall be removed except for cause and unless charges are preferred against the person and the person is accorded an opportunity to be heard in the person’s own defense. Within ten days after charges are filed against any such person in the office of the city auditor, the board shall proceed to hear and determine the case upon its merits. The president of the board of city commissioners, or the board, by a majority vote of its members, may suspend any officer or employee against whom charges have been preferred until the disposition of the charges. The president may appoint a person to fill any vacancy temporarily until charges against the incumbent of such office have been disposed of. Any person appointed by the president without confirmation may be removed by the president when the president deems it is for the best interests of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 21, 23, 38; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 21, 23, 38; 1913, ch. 80, § 2; C.L. 1913, §§ 3791, 3793, 3808; R.C. 1943, § 40-1507.
Notes to Decisions
- Abandonment of Office.
- Appeal.
- Due Process.
- Oath of Commissioners.
- Procedures.
- Removal Proceedings Are Quasi-Judicial.
Abandonment of Office.
Where, after removal, a policeman, in effect, abandons his office he is not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel reinstatement and the payment of compensation. Dawes v. Grand Forks, 62 N.D. 67, 243 N.W. 802, 1931 N.D. LEXIS 234 (N.D. 1931).
Appeal.
The institution of second proceedings by a board of city commissioners to remove a city assessor after the district court declared the first proceedings null and void on certiorari does not deprive the commissioners of the right to have the validity of the first removal proceedings determined on appeal to the supreme court. State ex rel. Ness v. Board of City Comm'rs, 63 N.D. 33, 245 N.W. 887, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 134 (N.D. 1932).
Where a city official has been removed by the board of city commissioners, the only question that can be considered on certiorari is the question of the board’s jurisdiction. State ex rel. Ness v. Board of Comm'rs, 63 N.D. 85, 246 N.W. 243, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 139 (N.D. 1932).
Due Process.
In a hearing for dismissal of a city superintendent and building inspector, there was no evidence to support allegations that the city commissioner who signed the statement of charges, and another commissioner who had recommended dismissal some years earlier, were so prejudiced against the superintendent as to violate due process, where there was no showing of pecuniary benefit or personal animosity. Mattheis v. Hazen, 421 N.W.2d 476, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1988).
Oath of Commissioners.
The commissioners may act at the hearing without taking an oath to try the case fairly since they have a duty to act in such hearings and their oath of office is sufficient. State ex rel. Ness v. Board of Comm'rs, 63 N.D. 85, 246 N.W. 243, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 139 (N.D. 1932).
Procedures.
Where a city superintendent was served with a notice of hearing which incorporated a statement of charges, and a hearing was held upon the merits of the case within ten days after charges were filed, and the city commission gave him an opportunity to be heard in his own defense, and he was removed from his duties for cause by a majority vote of all the members of the city commission, the removal procedures of this section were followed by the city commission. Mattheis v. Hazen, 421 N.W.2d 476, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 84 (N.D. 1988).
Removal Proceedings Are Quasi-Judicial.
Proceedings before the board of city commissioners for the removal of a city official are quasi-judicial and require every essential element of a fair trial. State ex rel. Ness v. Board of City Comm'rs, 63 N.D. 33, 245 N.W. 887, 1932 N.D. LEXIS 134 (N.D. 1932).
CHAPTER 40-16 City Auditor
40-16-01. Office of city auditor — Location — Salary.
Each city auditor of each city shall keep the city auditor’s office at the meeting place of the governing body or at such place as designated by the governing body. The city auditor’s salary shall be fixed by the city governing body and the city auditor shall receive no fees or per diem in addition thereto.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 6, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2168; R.C. 1899, § 2168; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 69; R.C. 1905, § 2700; C.L. 1913, § 3624; R.C. 1943, § 40-1601; S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 6.
40-16-02. Deputy auditor — Appointment — Duties — Liability.
The city auditor, with the consent and approval of the governing body of the city, may appoint a deputy and file such appointment in the city auditor’s office. The deputy, if one is appointed, shall aid in the performance of the duties of the office under the auditor’s direction and in the absence or disability of the auditor, or if there is a vacancy in the office of the auditor, the deputy shall perform the duties of the auditor. The auditor and the surety on the auditor’s official bond shall be liable for the acts of the deputy.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 39; 1911, ch. 77, § 39; C.L. 1913, § 3809; R.C. 1943, § 40-1602.
40-16-03. Duties of city auditor in general.
It shall be the duty of each city auditor:
- Meetings. To attend all meetings of the governing body and keep a complete record of its proceedings. The official proceedings are to be signed by the auditor when they are prepared and by the executive officer upon board approval at a subsequent meeting.
- Records. To keep all papers and records of the city.
- Records. To maintain a complete record of all financial transactions of the city which includes receipts, disbursements, fund balances, and other assets, liabilities, and equity.
- Bonds and evidences of indebtedness. To examine and countersign all bonds, orders, or other evidences of indebtedness of the city before the same become valid.
- Books of account. To keep regular books of account in which the city auditor shall enter all indebtedness of the city and which at all times shall show the financial condition of the city, the amount of bonds, orders, certificates, or other evidences of indebtedness issued by the governing body, the amount of all bonds, orders, certificates, or other evidences of indebtedness which have been redeemed, and the amount of each outstanding.
- List of bonds, orders, and other evidences of indebtedness. To make and keep a list of outstanding city bonds, orders, certificates, or other evidences of indebtedness showing to whom and for what purpose the same were issued, when and where each is payable, the rate of interest each bears, and to recommend such action to the governing body as will secure the punctual payment of the principal and interest of such bonds or other indebtedness.
- Countersign contracts. To countersign all contracts made in behalf of the city if the necessary funds have been provided to pay the liability incurred thereunder, to countersign certificates of work authorized by any committee of the governing body, or by any city officer. Each contract made in behalf of a city or to which a city is a party shall be void unless countersigned by the auditor.
- Present communications. To present to the governing body for its consideration at its next meeting all communications, claims, and other matters filed in the city auditor’s office.
- Ordinances and official bonds. To record all ordinances adopted and licenses granted by the city and all official bonds of city officers in books kept for that purpose which shall be open to public inspection at reasonable times.
- Work certificates. To keep a list of all certificates issued by the city for work or any other purpose.
- Accounts with officers. To keep accounts with all receiving and disbursing officers of the city showing the amount they have received from the different sources of revenue, and the amount which they have disbursed under the direction of the governing body.
- Record of official acts. To keep a record of the city auditor’s official acts and doings and to enter all contracts in an indexed book which shall be open to the inspection of the public.
- Special assessment lists. To make a list of all certificates for the payment of which special taxes are to be levied in each year in time for the same to be inserted in the tax roll in the form of a schedule of special taxes and to certify to the correctness thereof. The certified schedule shall be prima facie evidence of the legality and regularity of the taxes levied in pursuance thereof, but no irregularity in the making of such lists shall invalidate any such special tax.
- Receipts. To issue prenumbered duplicate receipts for all moneys paid into the city treasury from whatever source received specifying the date and amount of such payment and upon what account such money is paid. Such receipts shall be recorded numerically in the record of receipts.
- Disbursements. Submit all claims against the city to the governing body for approval. Upon approval, the auditor shall draw and countersign, along with the executive officer, a warrant in payment of the claim. No warrant shall be delivered or mailed until such warrant has been recorded in the disbursement record. Approval of all claims shall be recorded in the official proceedings of the governing body showing the warrant number, payee, and amount, except that salaries and wages may be consolidated in one order, and this shall be sufficient to indicate approval without requiring a majority of the members of the governing body to sign or initial the voucher or order for payment.
- Monthly reconcilement. To reconcile monthly the bank statements listing all deposits in transit and outstanding checks.
- Additional duties. To perform, from time to time, such duties not required specifically by the provisions of this chapter as the governing body may direct.
- Training. For an individual who is appointed to the position of city auditor, to complete, within one year of assuming office, training based on a curriculum specific to that office and approved by a statewide association representing cities.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 6, §§ 1, 2, 3; R.C. 1895, §§ 2168 to 2170; R.C. 1899, §§ 2168 to 2170; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 69 to 71; R.C. 1905, §§ 2700 to 2702; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 39, 42; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 39, 42; C.L. 1913, §§ 3624 to 3626, 3809, 3812; S.L. 1927, ch. 181, §§ 1, 2; 1927, ch. 191, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1603; S.L. 1973, ch. 80, § 13; 1973, ch. 320, § 7; 1975, ch. 366, § 6; 2001, ch. 122, § 5; 2017, ch. 279, § 1, eff January 1, 2018.
Cross-References.
Assessment list changes necessitated by changes in wards, duty to make, see § 40-52-06.
Cash book and register to be footed daily and closed annually, see § 21-01-09.
Depositories of public funds, see ch. 21-04.
Duties as clerk of city board of equalization, see § 57-11-02.
Duties as park district treasurer, see § 40-49-08.
Gravel assessment book, duty to keep, see § 40-54-07.
Issuance of registered warrants, see ch. 21-01.
Notes to Decisions
Claims Against City.
The city auditor is the official representative of the city council for the purpose of receiving claims against the city, including claims for personal injuries. Pyke v. Jamestown, 15 N.D. 157, 107 N.W. 359 (1906), decided prior to the amendment of N.D.C.C. § 40-42-04. City of Grand Forks v. Allman, 153 F. 532, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4428 (8th Cir. N.D. 1907).
Election Duties.
It is the duty of the city auditor to furnish ballots and election supplies for the conduct of an election of city commissioners. State ex rel. Shaw v. Thompson, 21 N.D. 426, 131 N.W. 231, 1911 N.D. LEXIS 102 (N.D. 1911).
40-16-04. Reports of city auditor.
The city auditor of each city shall prepare and submit to the governing body of the city reports as follows:
- Monthly financial statement. A monthly financial statement shall be prepared showing the revenues, expenditures, transfers, and fund balances.
- Annual financial statement. An annual financial statement shall be prepared, on or before March first, showing the revenues, expenditures, transfers, and fund balances of the city for the year ended December thirty-first. This financial statement shall be retained in the office of the city auditor as a permanent public record.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 6, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2169; R.C. 1899, § 2169; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 70; R.C. 1905, § 2701; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 25, 42; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 25, 42; C.L. 1913, §§ 3625, 3795, 3812; S.L. 1927, ch. 181, § 1; 1927, ch. 191, § 1; 1927, ch. 192, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1604; S.L. 1983, ch. 457, § 1; 2003, ch. 344, § 1.
40-16-05. Auditor to publish statement.
Within sixty days after the close of each fiscal year, the auditor of each city shall make and cause to be published in the official city newspaper a financial statement of the city showing the receipts and disbursements on account of each fund during the last preceding year.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 39; 1911, ch. 77, § 39; C.L. 1913, § 3809; R.C. 1943, § 40-1605; S.L. 2003, ch. 344, § 2.
Cross-References.
Official newspaper of municipality, see § 40-01-09.
40-16-06. Claims and demands against city filed with auditor — Duty of auditor.
All claims and demands against a city, whether founded on contract or otherwise, and to be paid from any fund, including a municipal utilities fund, shall be filed with the city auditor. The city auditor shall examine each claim filed and determine whether or not it is properly itemized and certified in the form prescribed in section 54-14-04. If a claim is filed on a contract, the city auditor shall determine whether or not the items charged are correct and were incurred by proper authority. The auditor shall endorse the auditor’s approval upon any claim that the auditor finds to be correct. If the city auditor disapproves any claim in whole or in part, the auditor shall report the auditor’s reasons therefor to the governing body. The city auditor shall report all evidence taken by the auditor in connection with any claim. No claim shall be considered by the governing body until it shall have been examined and reported upon by the auditor and audited and adjusted by the proper committee or member of the governing body.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 6, § 3; R.C. 1895, § 2170; R.C. 1899, § 2170; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 71; R.C. 1905, § 2702; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 42; 1911, ch. 77, § 42; C.L. 1913, §§ 3626, 3812; S.L. 1927, ch. 181, § 2; 1927, ch. 191, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1606; S.L. 1949, ch. 256, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-1606.
40-16-07. Auditor may take testimony.
A city auditor may administer oaths and affirmations to witness and take testimony in connection with any of the duties imposed upon the city auditor by the laws of this state.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 39; 1911, ch. 77, § 39; C.L. 1913, § 3809; R.C. 1943, § 40-1607.
40-16-08. Auditor a member of board of public works in commission city.
The city auditor in a city operating under the commission system of government shall be ex officio secretary of the board of public works and shall perform the duties of a member of such board.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, §§ 39, 42; 1911, ch. 77, §§ 39, 42; C.L. 1913, §§ 3809, 3812; S.L. 1927, ch. 191, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-1608.
40-16-09. Copies of books, records, and transcripts of records of city auditor as evidence.
Copies of any and all books, papers, documents, or instruments duly filed and kept in the office of a city auditor and transcripts from the records of the proceedings of the governing body of a city certified by the city auditor shall be evidence in all courts and places in like manner and with the same force and effect as if the originals were produced.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 6, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2168; R.C. 1899, § 2168; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 69; R.C. 1905, § 2700; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 39; 1911, ch. 77, § 39; C.L. 1913, §§ 3624, 3809; R.C. 1943, § 40-1609; S.L. 1973, ch. 80, § 14.
Cross-References.
Changes in records necessitated by changes in wards, see § 40-52-05.
40-16-10. Destruction of city records. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1981, ch. 276, § 3.
40-16-11. Funds — Controlled by governing body — Exceptions — Disbursement on order.
All funds in the city treasury, except school funds, funds created and set apart for the payment of interest and principal of the debt of the city, and funds collected on special assessments, shall be under the control of the governing body of the city and shall be drawn out when authorized by a vote of the governing body, upon the order of the executive officer countersigned by the city auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 9.
40-16-12. Special funds not to be paid out for any other purpose.
The city auditor shall pay out funds appropriated for special purposes only for the purposes for which they were appropriated even though the governing body directs to the contrary.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 10.
40-16-13. Warrants — Cancellation — Destruction — Description in minutes.
The governing body, at a regular meeting, may cancel and destroy all warrants drawn on any fund of the city which have remained on file for a period of one year or more next preceding the regular meeting at which the cancellation takes place. The governing body may cancel and destroy all warrants and checks which have been subject to payment and which have not been presented for payment for a period of one year or more next preceding such regular meeting. The governing body, before canceling and destroying any such warrants or checks, shall cause to be entered in the minutes of its proceedings a brief description of the warrant or check, containing the name of the payee, and the number, date, and amount of each warrant or check to be canceled and destroyed. If the party entitled to any such warrant or check, or to payment thereon, shall appear thereafter and give good and sufficient reason for that party’s delay in calling for such warrant or check or in presenting the same for payment, the governing body may issue to that person a new warrant or check in the amount to which that person is entitled, except for the statute of limitations.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 11.
40-16-14. Auditor not to commingle city’s money — Violation forfeits office.
The city auditor shall keep the city’s money separate from other moneys, and shall not, either directly or indirectly, use the city’s money, warrants, or other obligations in the auditor’s custody and keep it for the auditor’s own use and benefit or for that of any other person or persons. If the auditor is convicted of a violation of this section, the city auditor’s office shall be forfeited and shall become vacant.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 12.
40-16-15. Assume the duties of the city treasurer.
The city auditor shall assume all functions and duties of the city treasurer when indicated in other chapters of the code.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 13.
Cross-References.
Warrant register, by whom kept, form, see § 21-01-07.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Corporation.
A foreign corporation may not act as city treasurer, nor as a depository, nor may a city lend credit to a corporation. State ex rel. Kistler v. Hankinson, 53 N.D. 346, 205 N.W. 995, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1925).
40-16-16. Delegation of powers and duties.
The city council or city commission may delegate any functions and duties of the city auditor to an officer appointed under section 40-14-04 or 40-15-05.
Source:
S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 14.
CHAPTER 40-17 City Treasurer [Repealed]
[Repealed by S.L. 1973, ch. 320, § 19]
CHAPTER 40-18 Municipal Judges
40-18-01. Jurisdiction and qualifications of municipal judge.
- The municipal judge within a city having a population of five thousand or more must be licensed to practice law in this state, unless no person so licensed is available in the city. In a city with a population of less than five thousand, the municipal judge need not be licensed to practice law in this state, nor may the judge be required to be a resident of the city. The municipal judge has jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine offenses against the ordinances of the city.
- In a city with a population of less than five thousand, the city may, by resolution or ordinance, require that municipal judges of the city be licensed to practice law in this state.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the municipal court has no jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine an offense which would be a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance, if the individual charged with the offense has twice previously been convicted of a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance within the seven years preceding the commission of the offense charged or if the individual charged with the offense has three times previously been convicted of a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance within the fifteen years preceding the commission of the offense charged. If such an offense is charged in the municipal court and the municipal judge has notice of a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance twice within the seven years, or three times within the fifteen years, preceding the commission of the offense charged, the municipal judge shall dismiss the charge, without prejudice, and direct that the charge be filed against the individual in district court.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a municipal court in which the judge is not a person licensed to practice law in this state has no jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine an offense that would be a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance.
Source:
S.L. 1881, ch. 134, § 1; 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 5, art. 10, § 1; 1889, ch. 33, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2152, 2193, 2403; R.C. 1899, §§ 2152, 2193, 2403, S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 53, 90; R.C. 1905, §§ 2684, 2723, 2911; C.L. 1913, §§ 3605, 3647, 3917; R.C. 1943, § 40-1801; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 4; 1963, ch. 292, § 2; 1965, ch. 286, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 126; 1973, ch. 326, § 1; 1981, ch. 320, § 96; 1983, ch. 415, § 36; 1987, ch. 375, § 4; 1991, ch. 446, § 1; 1991, ch. 326, § 155; 2019, ch. 335, § 2, eff August 1, 2019.
Cross-References.
Election of municipal judges, see §§ 40-14-01, 40-15-01.
Minors transferred to juvenile court, see § 27-20-09.
Term of office of municipal judges, see §§ 40-14-02, 40-15-02.
Notes to Decisions
Authority to Adjudicate.
Imposition of a fine for violation of municipal ordinances was reversed and remanded for entry of an order vacating the decision because the Fargo Administrative Enforcement Board had no statutory authority to adjudicate the owner’s alleged violations of the municipal ordinances and its decision was void, when there was no authority for the creation of an administrative system for adjudication of alleged violations of ordinances or regulations enacted by the municipality as an alternative to municipal court and the responsibilities granted to the Board conflicted with N.D.C.C. § 40-18-01(1). City of Fargo v. Malme, 2007 ND 137, 737 N.W.2d 390, 2007 N.D. LEXIS 141 (N.D. 2007).
Limited Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of North Dakota held that post-conviction relief under N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1 was not available in municipal courts in North Dakota, because municipal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 40-18-01(1); whereas, the district courts have general jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 27-05-06. Jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for post-conviction relief was designed to be vested in courts of general jurisdiction. Holbach v. City of Minot, 2012 ND 117, 817 N.W.2d 340, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 109 (N.D. 2012).
Collateral References.
Criminal jurisdiction of municipal or other local court, 102 A.L.R.5th 525.
Law Reviews.
Survey of the Trial Courts of the North Dakota Judicial System, 26 Bar Briefs, State Bar Ass’n of N.D. 345 (1950).
40-18-02. City justice of the peace — Jurisdiction and procedure. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 34.
40-18-03. Vacancy in office of municipal judge — Temporary absence of municipal judge.
If a vacancy exists in the office of municipal judge by death, resignation, or otherwise, it must be filled by appointment by the executive officer, subject to confirmation by the governing body of the city. An appointee shall qualify and hold office until the next city election and until a successor is elected and qualified. The governing body may appoint an alternate municipal judge to serve when the municipal judge is unable to serve due to temporary absence, interest, disqualification, or disability. The alternate judge must be compensated at a rate set by the governing body and shall possess the qualifications of a municipal judge.
Source:
S.L. 1889, ch. 33, § 7; R.C. 1895, § 2204; R.C. 1899, § 2204; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 101; R.C. 1905, § 2734; C.L. 1913, § 3658; R.C. 1943, § 40-1803; S.L. 1955, ch. 265, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-1803; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 15; 1963, ch. 292, § 1; 1965, ch. 286, § 2; 1967, ch. 327, § 3; 1981, ch. 320, § 97; 1987, ch. 375, § 5.
Cross-References.
Rule relating to district judge and municipal judge self-disqualification procedure, see N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 17, North Dakota Century Code Court Rules Annotated.
40-18-04. Office hours of municipal judge. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P. 56.
40-18-05. Municipal judge is conservator of the peace — Powers on Sunday restricted.
The municipal judge within the judge’s city shall be a conservator of the peace and shall have power to bring persons before the municipal judge forthwith for trial. The municipal judge’s court shall be open every day except Sunday to hear and determine cases cognizable before the municipal judge. The municipal judge shall perform no official act on Sunday but may receive complaints, issue process, take bail, and receive verdicts.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 68; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 10, § 8; R.C. 1895, §§ 2200, 2410; R.C. 1899, §§ 2200, 2410; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 97; R.C. 1905, §§ 2730, 2918; C.L. 1913, §§ 3654, 3924; R.C. 1943, § 40-1805; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 16; 1965, ch. 286, § 4; 1967, ch. 323, § 127.
40-18-06. Salary of municipal judge — Payment of funds to treasury.
The municipal judge must be paid a salary by the city and may not be paid in relation to fees or fines collected by the municipal court. The municipal judge’s salary may not be reduced during the municipal judge’s term of office.
At the end of each month, the municipal judge shall make and file with the city auditor a written report under oath showing an account of all fees, fines, costs, forfeitures, and any other monetary consideration collected by the court during the preceding month and showing the actions in which the fees were collected. The municipal court shall pay the amount of fees, fines, costs, forfeitures, and any other monetary consideration collected to the city treasury at the end of each month. The judge’s salary may not be paid until the judge has complied with this section.
Source:
S.L. 1877, ch. 73, art. 5, § 12; 1893, ch. 35, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2166; R.C. 1899, § 2166; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 67; R.C. 1905, § 2698; C.L. 1913, § 3622; R.C. 1943, § 40-1806; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 32; 1965, ch. 286, § 5; 1975, ch. 373, § 1; 1983, ch. 82, § 79; 1987, ch. 375, § 6.
40-18-06.1. Municipal court clerk — Appointment — Salary — Authority.
The governing body of a city, with the consent of its municipal judge, may appoint any qualified person to serve as municipal court clerk or deputy clerk for municipal ordinance violations. A municipal court clerk or deputy clerk is entitled to receive a salary as fixed by the governing body. The municipal judge is responsible for the supervision of the municipal court clerk or deputy clerk when the clerk or deputy clerk is performing judicial or administrative functions on behalf of the municipal court. The municipal judge may assign responsibilities to the municipal court clerk or deputy clerk, including the administration of the office of the municipal court and the supervision of other personnel of that office. The supreme court may adopt rules for the qualifications of municipal court clerks and deputy clerks, the extent and assignment of authority by municipal judges, and the conduct of the office, including rules for training sessions and for continuing education.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 375, § 7; 1997, ch. 351, § 1.
40-18-06.2. Transfer of municipal ordinance cases to district court — Abolition of office of municipal judge.
With the agreement of the governing body of the county, the presiding judge of the judicial district in which the city is located, and the state court administrator, the governing body of a city may, by ordinance, transfer some or all of the cases of the municipal court to the district court serving the county in which the city is located. These cases are deemed district court cases for purposes of appeal. The governing body of a city with a population of less than five thousand, upon transferring all municipal court cases to the district court, may abolish by resolution the office of municipal judge. The term of office of the municipal judge elected to serve that city terminates upon the last day of the month in which all municipal cases have been transferred to district court or the expiration of the judge’s term, whichever occurs first.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 375, § 8; 1991, ch. 326, §§ 156, 157; 2019, ch. 336, § 1, eff March 21, 2019.
40-18-07. Warrants of arrest issued by municipal judge — Service of warrant. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P., Rule 4.
40-18-08. Warrants issued by municipal judge to run to whom. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P., Rule 4.
40-18-09. Subpoena of witnesses — Continuance of trial — Verbal notice to witnesses to attend. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P., Rule 17.
40-18-10. Trials for misdemeanors before municipal judge governed by justice court procedure. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 327, § 4.
40-18-11. How proceedings in criminal cases not provided for in this chapter to be governed. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P., Rules 1, 54.
40-18-12. Commitment for violation of city ordinance — Limitation — Labor in lieu of fine — Diagnosis and treatment of persons convicted while driving under the influence.
If the defendant is found guilty of the violation of a municipal ordinance and is committed as provided in section 40-11-12, the governing body may provide by ordinance that the defendant work for the city at such labor as the defendant’s strength and health permit, not exceeding eight hours in each working day. For that work, the person so imprisoned must be allowed for each day, exclusive of board, ten dollars on account of the fines and costs assessed. If a person is convicted under an ordinance prohibiting driving or being in physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor or a narcotic drug, the court shall order the person to an appropriate licensed addiction treatment program for addiction evaluation.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, §§ 67, 70; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 4, § 4, art. 10, § 7; R.C. 1895, §§ 2151, 2199, 2409, 2412; R.C. 1899, §§ 2151, 2199, 2409, 2412; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 52, 96; R.C. 1905, §§ 2683, 2729, 2917, 2920; C.L. 1913, §§ 3604, 3653, 3923, 3926; R.C. 1943, § 40-1812; S.L. 1967, ch. 113, § 2; 1967, ch. 323, § 129; 1973, ch. 302, § 2; 1975, ch. 106, § 455; 1983, ch. 415, § 37; 1985, ch. 429, § 22.
Cross-References.
Driving under the influence, requiring participation in addiction treatment program, see § 39-06.1-10.
Limitations on city fines and penalties, see § 40-05-06.
Motor vehicle convictions reported to licensing authority, see § 39-07-11.
Collateral References.
Operation of bicycle as within drunk driving statute, 73 A.L.R.4th 1139.
40-18-13. Sentencing alternatives — Suspension of sentence or imposition of sentence.
Subject to section 40-05-06, a municipal judge may use the sentencing alternatives provided by section 12.1-32-02 and may suspend any sentence the judge imposes or defer the imposition of any sentence during the good behavior of any person adjudged to have committed an offense, or for other reasonable cause, under subsection 3 or 4 of section 12.1-32-02, except that a municipal judge may not suspend a sentence or the imposition of sentence for driving a motor vehicle in violation of an operator’s license suspension, revocation, or restriction or for a violation of section 39-08-01 or equivalent ordinance if that suspension of sentence or suspension of the imposition of sentence is prohibited under section 39-06-17 or 39-06-42 or chapter 39-08.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 10, § 10; R.C. 1895, § 2202; R.C. 1899, § 2202; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 99; R.C. 1905, § 2732; C.L. 1913, § 3656; R.C. 1943, § 40-1813; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 21; 1965, ch. 286, § 11; 1981, ch. 409, § 2; 1983, ch. 415, § 38; 1989, ch. 158, § 16.
40-18-14. Municipal judge may enforce orders and judgments and punish for contempt.
A municipal judge may enforce due obedience to the court’s orders and judgments. The judge may fine or imprison for contempt committed in the judge’s presence while holding court, as well as for contempt of process issued, and of orders made by the judge. When an act or omission constituting a contempt in a municipal court is not committed in the presence of the municipal judge, an affidavit alleging the facts may be filed and a warrant of arrest thereupon may issue on which the person accused may be arrested and brought before the municipal judge immediately. The person must be given a reasonable opportunity to employ counsel and defend against the alleged contempt. After hearing the allegations and proofs, the municipal judge may discharge the person or adjudge the person guilty and may punish by fine or imprisonment or both. The fine in any case may not be more than one thousand five hundred dollars and the imprisonment may not be more than thirty days.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 71; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 10, § 13; 1889, ch. 33, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2206, 2413; R.C. 1899, §§ 2206, 2413; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 103; R.C. 1905, §§ 2736, 2921; C.L. 1913, §§ 3660, 3927; R.C. 1943, § 40-1814; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 22; 1965, ch. 286, § 12; 1981, ch. 320, § 98; 1987, ch. 375, § 9; 1997, ch. 132, § 4; 2019, ch. 335, § 3, eff August 1, 2019.
Notes to Decisions
Limited Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of North Dakota held that post-conviction relief under N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1 was not available in municipal courts in North Dakota, because municipal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 40-18-14; whereas, the district courts have general jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 27-05-06. Jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for post-conviction relief was designed to be vested in courts of general jurisdiction. Holbach v. City of Minot, 2012 ND 117, 817 N.W.2d 340, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 109 (N.D. 2012).
40-18-14.1. Judgment for fine or costs.
If the judgment provided for in section 40-18-14 imposes a fine or assesses a cost, the municipal judge may order an authenticated copy of the judgment be filed in the office of the clerk of any district court of any county in the state. The clerk of district court shall treat the municipal court judgment in the same manner as a civil judgment of any district court of any county of the state.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 304, § 1, eff July 1, 2021.
40-18-14.2. Notice of filing.
- At the time of filing a judgment under section 40-18-14, the municipal court judge shall order an affidavit providing the name and last-known mailing address of the defendant and otherwise complying with section 28-20-15 be filed.
- Upon the filing of the judgment and affidavit as provided in section 40-18-14, the clerk of municipal court shall mail notice of the filing of the municipal judgment to the defendant at the defendant’s last-known address and file proof of mailing with the district court. The notice must include the name and mailing address of the municipal court.
- An execution of other process for enforcement of a municipal court judgment filed under this section may not be issued until ten days after the date the judgment is filed.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 304, § 2, eff July 1, 2021.
40-18-14.3. Stay.
If the defendant shows the district court of any county that an appeal from the judgment provided in section 40-18-14 is pending or will be taken, the court shall stay enforcement of the municipal court judgment until the appeal is concluded or the time of appeal expires.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 304, § 3, eff July 1, 2021.
40-18-14.4. Fees.
The municipal judge shall order a filing fee of ten dollars to be paid to the clerk of the district court.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 304, § 4, eff July 1, 2021.
40-18-14.5. Effect of filing.
Upon filing of a judgment under section 40-18-14 with the district court in accordance with this chapter, the judgment is enforceable only in the same manner as provided for a judgment for money in a civil action.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 304, § 5, eff July 1, 2021.
40-18-15. Trials in nonjury cases arising under the ordinances of a city.
An action for the violation of a city ordinance for which the right to a jury trial does not otherwise exist or in which the defendant has timely and appropriately waived a right to a jury trial in writing pursuant to rules of the supreme court may be tried and determined by the municipal judge without the intervention of a jury. In the event of an adverse verdict in a municipal court trial, a defendant may appeal as provided in section 40-18-19, but a waiver of jury trial in the municipal court proceeding also constitutes a waiver of jury trial in the district court.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 71; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 10, § 13; 1889, ch. 33, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2206, 2413; R.C. 1899, §§ 2206, 2413; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 103; R.C. 1905, §§ 2736, 2921; C.L. 1913, §§ 3660, 3927; R.C. 1943, § 40-1815; S.L. 1965, ch. 286, § 13; 1967, ch. 323, § 130; 1973, ch. 327, § 1; 1987, ch. 375, § 10; 1991, ch. 326, § 158.
Notes to Decisions
Construction.
This section’s guarantee of a jury trial on appeal from municipal court if the defendant has not waived his right to jury trial is superseded by N.D.C.C. § 40-18-15.1, which requires the defendant to demand a jury trial within 28 days of arraignment. City of Bismarck v. Fettig, 1999 ND 193, 601 N.W.2d 247, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 210 (N.D. 1999).
Jury Trial.
While a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial in municipal court, he does have a statutory right under this section to a trial by jury upon appeal from determination of a municipal judge. City of Bismarck v. Altevogt, 353 N.W.2d 760, 1984 N.D. LEXIS 340 (N.D. 1984).
Waiver of Jury Trial.
Where defendant did not show up for trial on driving under influence charge and the municipal court granted the city prosecutor’s motion to forfeit his bond, defendant prevented the occurrence of the jurisdictional predicate (a municipal court trial and a determination by the municipal judge) giving rise to his right to secure a jury trial upon appeal (decided prior to 1987 amendments to section 40-18-15 and enactment of section 40-18-15.1). City of Minot v. Mattern, 449 N.W.2d 560, 1989 N.D. LEXIS 248 (N.D. 1989).
40-18-15.1. Transfer to district court — Expenses of prosecution — Division of funds and expenses between city, county, and state.
A matter may be transferred to district court for trial if within twenty-eight days after arraignment the defendant has requested in writing to transfer the case to district court and to exercise the defendant’s right to a jury trial. After a transfer to district court, if the defendant waives a jury trial, the matter must be remanded to the municipal court for disposition if the defendant and prosecuting attorney agree to the remand. Unless remanded to the municipal court by agreement of the parties, the district court shall retain jurisdiction for sentencing. The city shall provide a prosecuting attorney and, in the case of any indigent defendant, a defense attorney. The city may contract with the county, state, or any individual or entity for prosecution or defense services. In the contract, the city, county, and state may agree to a division of all fees, fines, costs, forfeitures, and any other monetary consideration collected from cases transferred under this section, which must be paid to the city and county treasury and state general fund at least once each quarter. At the time of payment, the clerk of district court shall account under oath to the city auditor, county, and state treasurer for all money collected. In the contract the city, county, and state may also agree to a division of expenses, including jury and witness expenses, related to cases transferred under this section. In the absence of a contract all fees, fines, costs, forfeitures, and any other monetary consideration collected from transferred cases must be deposited in the state general fund.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 375, § 11; 1989, ch. 489, § 1; 1989, ch. 490, § 1; 1991, ch. 326, § 159; 1995, ch. 388, § 1; 1995, ch. 389, § 1; 2011, ch. 295, § 1; 2017, ch. 280, § 1, eff August 1, 2017.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 295, S.L. 2011 became effective August 1, 2011.
Notes to Decisions
In General.
Under this section, a municipal court prosecution is automatically transferred to county court for trial if the defendant does not waive in writing the right to a jury trial within twenty-eight days after arraignment. City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584, 1991 N.D. LEXIS 17 (N.D. 1991).
A municipal court defendant must request a jury trial and a transfer to the district court within 28 days of arraignment or the right to jury trial is waived. City of Bismarck v. Fettig, 1999 ND 193, 601 N.W.2d 247, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 210 (N.D. 1999).
Because a driver failed to make a timely request under N.D.C.C. § 40-18-15.1 to transfer the matter involving his violation of a municipal ordinance by speeding to district court for trial after arraignment, his right to a jury trial was lost. City of Grand Forks v. Riemers, 2008 ND 153, 755 N.W.2d 99, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 153 (N.D. 2008).
Because Minot Code of Ordinances § 2-71 and N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 did not conflict and the language for supersession in N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-05 did not apply, the city retained the power applicable to all municipalities under N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 to appoint assistant city attorneys and the city had the statutory authority and power to contract with a county under N.D.C.C. §§ 54-40.3-01 and 40-18-15.1 for municipal prosecution services. City of Minot v. Rudolph, 2008 ND 231, 758 N.W.2d 731, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 201 (N.D. 2008).
District court erred in holding that it was prohibited from taking judicial notice of the city ordinance by a prior case and N.D.C.C. §§ 40-18-15.1 and 40-18-19. City of Bismarck v. McCormick, 2012 ND 53, 813 N.W.2d 599, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 55 (N.D. 2012).
Constitutionality.
This section’s requirement that a municipal court defendant charged with violation of a city ordinance demand a jury trial within 28 days of arraignment does not violate N.D. Const. art. I, § 13. City of Bismarck v. Fettig, 1999 ND 193, 601 N.W.2d 247, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 210 (N.D. 1999).
Construction.
This section implicitly supersedes N.D.C.C. § 40-18-15 to the extent that the latter section guarantees defendants the right to jury trial on appeal from municipal court if the defendant has not waived his right to jury trial. City of Bismarck v. Fettig, 1999 ND 193, 601 N.W.2d 247, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 210 (N.D. 1999).
This section does not provide a municipal court or the clerk of court the authority to extend the 28-day time period in which to request a jury trial. City of Grand Forks v. Thong, 2002 ND 48, 640 N.W.2d 721, 2002 N.D. LEXIS 43 (N.D. 2002).
During defendant’s trial for driving under suspension, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for court-appointed counsel on the basis that defendant had to apply in municipal court because the district court was not authorized to grant such a request in light of the statute. City of Grand Forks v. Corman, 2009 ND 125, 767 N.W.2d 847, 2009 N.D. LEXIS 138 (N.D. 2009).
No Transfer.
Criminal judgment entered after a district court held a trial anew was reviewed on appeal because it was appropriately designated an appeal, rather than a transfer. A municipal judge erroneously treated defendant's notice of appeal as a request for “transfer.” City of Napoleon v. Kuhn, 2015 ND 75, 860 N.W.2d 460, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 54 (N.D. 2015).
Postconviction Proceedings.
Supreme Court of North Dakota lacked jurisdiction over a municipal court judgment denying petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief, because the appeal was not authorized by statute. An appeal from a final judgment in a matter that has been transferred from municipal court under N.D.C.C. § 40-18-15.1 to district court for trial can be brought to the Supreme Court; however, this appeal was not such a case. Holbach v. City of Minot, 2012 ND 117, 817 N.W.2d 340, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 109 (N.D. 2012).
Law Reviews.
Article: The Law Of Unintended Consequences: The North Dakota Supreme Court Recognizes the Right to a Jury Trial for Noncriminal Traffic Offenses in Riemers v. Eslinger, see 86 N.D. L. Rev. 505.
North Dakota Supreme Court Review, 76 N.D. L. Rev. 451 (2000).
40-18-16. Procedure when jury demanded in court of municipal judge. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1973, ch. 327, § 2.
40-18-17. Challenges for cause to jurors in court of municipal judge. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1973, ch. 327, § 3.
40-18-18. Fee of juror in court of municipal judge. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1973, ch. 327, § 4.
40-18-19. Appeals from determinations of municipal judge.
An appeal may be taken to the district court from a judgment of conviction or order deferring imposition of sentence in a municipal court in accordance with the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure. An appeal is perfected by notice of appeal. A perfected appeal to the district court transfers the action to such district court for trial anew. On all appeals from a determination in a municipal court, the district court shall take judicial notice of all of the ordinances of the city. No filing fee may be required in district court for the filing of an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance. Expenses necessary for the adequate defense of a needy person in an appeal to district court from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance, as approved by the presiding district judge, must be paid by the city wherein the alleged offense took place.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, §§ 69, 71; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 10, §§ 9, 13; 1889, ch. 33, § 5; R.C. 1895, §§ 2201, 2206, 2411, 2413; R.C. 1899, §§ 2201, 2206, 2411, 2413; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 98, 103; R.C. 1905, §§ 2731, 2736, 2919, 2921; C.L. 1913, §§ 3655, 3660, 3925, 3927; R.C. 1943, § 40-1819; S.L. 1955, ch. 266, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-1819; S.L. 1959, ch. 268, § 27; 1965, ch. 286, § 17; 1967, ch. 323, § 133; 1969, ch. 283, § 2; 1981, ch. 91, § 30; 1981, ch. 320, § 99; 1981, ch. 414, § 1; 1987, ch. 375, § 12; 1987, ch. 393, § 4; 1991, ch. 326, § 160.
Cross-References.
Appeals from determinations of municipal court to be filed and heard in district court of that county, see N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 16, North Dakota Century Code Court Rules Annotated.
Disposition of fines, penalties and forfeitures, see § 40-11-13.
Notes to Decisions
- Appellate Jurisdiction.
- Criminal Ordinance.
- Judicial Notice.
- Postconviction Proceedings.
- Presence of Defendant.
- Right to Counsel.
- Trial Anew in County Court.
- Trial Anew in District Court.
Appellate Jurisdiction.
N.D.C.C. § 40-18-19 and N.D. R. Crim. P. 37 limit a defendant's time for appealing from a municipal court's judgment of conviction and post-judgment orders. City of Williston v. Werkmeister, 2015 ND 172, 865 N.W.2d 429, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 185 (N.D. 2015).
Defendant's appeal of a district court order denying his appeal from a municipal court's order was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where defendant did not have a right to appeal to the district court from the municipal court's post-judgment orders under N.D.C.C. § 40-18-19, and his appeal from the judgment of conviction was not timely and did not comply with N.D. R. Crim. P. 37. City of Williston v. Werkmeister, 2015 ND 172, 865 N.W.2d 429, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 185 (N.D. 2015).
Criminal Ordinance.
A prosecution, under an ordinance prohibiting an offense likewise prohibited by state law as against public welfare and where the penalty may be imprisonment, is criminal in nature and criminal procedure applies; in such a case the city has no right to move for a new trial after the defendant has been acquitted. City of Minot v. Whitfield, 71 N.W.2d 766, 1955 N.D. LEXIS 132 (N.D. 1955).
Judicial Notice.
A copy of a foreign statute need not be in evidence before it is judicially noticed. City of Mandan v. Mertz, 399 N.W.2d 298, 1987 N.D. LEXIS 236 (N.D. 1987).
Where judicial notice of a municipal ordinance is required under this section, it is not necessary that a copy of the ordinance be placed in evidence, although it is essential that the trial court be supplied with the necessary information. City of Mandan v. Mertz, 399 N.W.2d 298, 1987 N.D. LEXIS 236 (N.D. 1987).
District court erred in holding that it was prohibited from taking judicial notice of the city ordinance by a prior case and N.D.C.C. §§ 40-18-15.1 and 40-18-19. City of Bismarck v. McCormick, 2012 ND 53, 813 N.W.2d 599, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 55 (N.D. 2012).
Postconviction Proceedings.
Supreme Court of North Dakota lacked jurisdiction over a municipal court judgment denying petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief, because the appeal was not authorized by statute. N.D.C.C. § 40-18-19 provides for an appeal to “the district court,” not directly to the Supreme Court; and provides for the appeal of a judgment of conviction or order deferring imposition of sentence. Holbach v. City of Minot, 2012 ND 117, 817 N.W.2d 340, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 109 (N.D. 2012).
Presence of Defendant.
N.D.R.Crim.P. 43 applies to appeals from municipal courts, as well as to criminal actions initiated in district court; therefore, although defendant’s right to be present under the Sixth Amendment and N.D. Const. art. I, § 12 was not violated when counsel was given the choice to proceed in his absence or face a dismissal of an appeal from municipal court because he had already appeared in the first trial of the case, an error was committed since his presence was required under N.D.R.Crim.P. 43(a). City of Fargo v. Komad, 2006 ND 177, 720 N.W.2d 619, 2006 N.D. LEXIS 184 (N.D. 2006).
Right to Counsel.
Defendant charged with driving violation is entitled to court appointed counsel in appeal to county court from his municipal court conviction if defendant is indigent and unless he waives such right or no actual incarceration is imposed upon conviction. City of Bismarck v. Saavedra, 397 N.W.2d 455, 1986 N.D. LEXIS 449 (N.D. 1986).
Trial Anew in County Court.
Because municipal courts are not courts of record, appeals from municipal court to county court require trial anew; although this procedure is cumbersome and duplicative, there was no constitutional deficiency in permitting the city to appeal from the pretrial suppression of evidence and dismissal of a DUI complaint against defendant, nor in permitting the city to present different evidence regarding the suppression motion at county court than that which was offered in municipal court. City of Bismarck v. Uhden, 513 N.W.2d 373, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 68 (N.D. 1994).
Trial Anew in District Court.
On appeal from a judgment of a police magistrate’s court, trial anew in the district court is not the exercise of original jurisdiction by the district court and does not violate the constitutional provision vesting exclusive jurisdiction over city ordinance violations in the police magistrate’s court. City of Minot v. Davis, 84 N.W.2d 891, 1957 N.D. LEXIS 143 (N.D. 1957).
Criminal judgment entered after a district court held a trial anew was reviewed on appeal because it was appropriately designated an appeal, rather than a transfer. A municipal judge erroneously treated defendant's notice of appeal as a request for “transfer.” City of Napoleon v. Kuhn, 2015 ND 75, 860 N.W.2d 460, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 54 (N.D. 2015).
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Appeal by Cities.
In this state there is no statutory regulation authorizing appeal by cities from judgments of police magistrates of acquittal of violations of municipal ordinances. Minot v. Kitzman, 71 N.W.2d 633, 1955 N.D. LEXIS 125 (N.D. 1955).
Law Reviews.
“A Comparison of Drinking and Driving Law in Norway and North Dakota: More Than a Difference in Penalties,” 76 N.D. L. Rev. 33 (2000).
North Dakota Supreme Court Review (City of Fargo v. Komad), 83 N.D. L. Rev. 1085 (2007).
40-18-20. Demand for change of judge.
Any party to a proceeding pending in any municipal court may obtain a change of judge pursuant to section 29-15-21, except that either a district judge or a municipal judge may be appointed to act in place of the disqualified judge. The alternate municipal judge, if any, is automatically appointed to preside in the case.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 327, § 1; 1987, ch. 375, § 13; 1991, ch. 326, § 161.
Cross-References.
Temporary disqualification of municipal judge, see § 40-18-03.
40-18-21. Change of venue in municipal court. [Repealed]
Superseded by N.D.R.Crim.P., Rule 21.
40-18-21.1. Change of venue — Reliable electronic means.
-
A municipal judge may change the venue of a proceeding under this chapter upon consideration of the following factors:
- Convenience to the parties and witnesses;
- Judicial efficiency;
- Available facilities; and
- Administration of justice.
- A municipal judge may not change the venue of a proceeding if any party to the proceeding objects to the change.
- A municipal judge may use contemporaneous audio or audiovisual transmission by reliable electronic means in accordance with rule 52 of the North Dakota Supreme Court Administrative Rules. A municipal judge who presides over a proceeding through contemporaneous audio or audiovisual transmission by reliable electronic means is equivalent to a municipal judge who is physically present at the proceeding.
Source:
S.L. 2019, ch. 337, § 1, eff August 1, 2019.
40-18-22. Continuing education of municipal judge and alternate judge required.
Each municipal judge and alternate judge shall comply with continuing judicial education requirements established by supreme court rule. The city shall reimburse the judge for necessary expenses of travel and subsistence as other city officials are so reimbursed.
If any judge fails to fulfill the requirements of this section, without being excused by the supreme court, the state court administrator shall report the judge’s failure to the judicial conduct commission for appropriate action.
Source:
S.L. 1975, ch. 272, § 4; 1985, ch. 339, § 4; 1987, ch. 375, § 14; 1999, ch. 365, § 1.
CHAPTER 40-19 Assessors
40-19-01. Duties of city assessor.
The city assessor within the city shall perform all the duties necessary in assessing the property within the city for the purpose of levying the municipal, county, school, and state taxes. Such assessors shall be governed by and shall make assessments and returns as is provided in title 57 and in this chapter.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 31; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 9, §§ 1, 2; 1893, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2184, 2185, 2374; R.C. 1899, §§ 2184, 2185, 2374; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 84, 85; R.C. 1905, §§ 2717, 2718, 2873; S.L. 1911, ch. 294, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3641, 3642, 3871; S.L. 1929, ch. 248, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-1901; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 134.
Cross-References.
Appointment of assessors in commission cities, see § 40-15-05.
Appointment of assessors in council cities, see § 40-14-04.
Salaries of assessors in municipalities, see § 40-13-04.
40-19-02. City assessor may list property prior to April first — Duty of county auditor. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1983, ch. 598, § 25.
40-19-03. Return of assessment roll by city assessor.
When the assessment is completed, and on or before the first day of April in each year, the city assessor shall return the assessment roll to the city auditor. The assessment roll shall be open to the inspection of the public until the meeting of the board of equalization of the municipality. The city auditor shall deliver the assessment roll to the board of equalization of the municipality at its regular meeting.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 31; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 9, §§ 1, 2; 1893, ch. 33, § 1; R.C. 1895, §§ 2184, 2185, 2374; R.C. 1899, §§ 2184, 2185, 2374; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 84, 85; R.C. 1905, §§ 2717, 2718, 2873; S.L. 1911, ch. 294, § 1; C.L. 1913, §§ 3641, 3642, 3871; S.L. 1929, ch. 248, § 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-1903; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 135; 1975, ch. 374, § 1.
Cross-References.
Changes in assessment lists necessitated by changes in wards, see § 40-52-06.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Affidavit.
The failure to attach the assessor’s affidavit to an assessment roll is illegal and renders the assessment void in an action at law; but in an equitable action to cancel a sale made, or certificate issued, or tax levied under such assessment, the omission will not invalidate the assessment if there is no allegation that it was unjust, unfair, or fraudulent. Douglas v. Fargo, 13 N.D. 467, 101 N.W. 919, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 80 (N.D. 1904).
40-19-04. Compensation of village assessor. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285.
CHAPTER 40-20 City Attorney, Engineer, Chief of Police, and Police Officers
40-20-01. City attorney — Duties — Docket.
The city attorney shall:
- Conduct all law business in which the city or any of its departments is interested.
- Furnish written opinions, when requested, upon all questions submitted to the city attorney by the governing body or any of the departments of the city.
- Draft all ordinances, bonds, contracts, leases, conveyances, and other instruments that may be required by the officers of the city.
- Examine tax and assessment rolls and all proceedings in reference to the levying and collecting of city taxes.
- Keep a docket of all cases to which the city may be a party in any court of record in which must be entered briefly all steps taken in each such case and such docket must be open to public inspection at all reasonable hours.
- Perform all other duties that may be prescribed by the governing body or by the ordinances of the city or the statutes of the state.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 7, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2175; R.C. 1899, § 2175; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 75; R.C. 1905, § 2706; S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 40; 1911, ch. 77, § 40; C.L. 1913, §§ 3630, 3810; R.C. 1943, § 40-2001.
Cross-References.
Record changes necessitated by changes in wards, duty to make, see § 40-52-05.
Notes to Decisions
Appeals.
This section empowers a city attorney to take an appeal in the absence of specific authorization to appeal granted by city commissioners at an open meeting; however, this does not mean that a city attorney’s decision to appeal may not be reviewed and set aside by the governing body of the city or may not be restricted by an ordinance duly enacted. State Bank v. Bismarck, 316 N.W.2d 85, 1982 N.D. LEXIS 232 (N.D. 1982).
Collateral References.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, §§ 198-204.
40-20-02. Assistant city attorneys — Appointment — Special counsel authorized.
With the consent and approval of the governing body of the city, the city attorney may appoint assistants to do any or all of the acts which the city attorney is required to do under this chapter, but the city attorney shall be responsible to the city for the acts of such assistants. The governing body of the city, however, may employ and pay special counsel when it deems such counsel to be necessary for the best interests of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 40; 1911, ch. 77, § 40; C.L. 1913, § 3810; R.C. 1943, § 40-2002; S.L. 1949, ch. 262, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2002.
Notes to Decisions
Appointment of Assistants.
The mayor and council may appoint attorneys to assist the city attorney, and are not required to select assistants from among resident lawyers. Scott v. Jamestown, 56 N.D. 454, 217 N.W. 668, 1928 N.D. LEXIS 231 (N.D. 1928).
Because Minot Code of Ordinances § 2-71 and N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 did not conflict and the language for supersession in N.D.C.C. § 40-05.1-05 did not apply, the city retained the power applicable to all municipalities under N.D.C.C. § 40-20-02 to appoint assistant city attorneys and the city had the statutory authority and power to contract with a county under N.D.C.C. §§ 54-40.3-01 and 40-18-15.1 for municipal prosecution services. City of Minot v. Rudolph, 2008 ND 231, 758 N.W.2d 731, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 201 (N.D. 2008).
Special Counsel for Electric Project.
City which was planning to erect and operate electrical distribution system had express authority, under this section, to employ special counsel to explore legal duty of public utility to provide transmission service to city as a common carrier or to furnish electrical energy at wholesale cost to city; appointment of special counsel was not an abuse of discretion under circumstances. Anderson v. Hankinson, 157 N.W.2d 833, 1968 N.D. LEXIS 105 (N.D. 1968).
40-20-03. City engineer — Qualifications — Duties — Compensation — Plans or surveys — Preservation and transfer to successor.
The city engineer must be a practical surveyor and engineer. The city engineer shall keep an office in some convenient place in the city and the governing body, by ordinance, shall prescribe the city engineer’s duties and compensation for services performed for the city. All surveys, profiles, plans, or estimates made by the city engineer for the city are the property of the city and must be carefully preserved in the office of the engineer and must be open to the inspection of all interested persons. The surveys, profiles, plans, estimates, and all books and papers pertaining to the city engineer’s office shall be delivered by the engineer at the expiration of the city engineer’s term of office to the successor city engineer or to the governing body of the city.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 11, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2248; R.C. 1899, § 2248; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 106; R.C. 1905, § 2739; C.L. 1913, § 3663; R.C. 1943, § 40-2003.
Cross-References.
Park district, serving as engineer and surveyor for, see § 40-49-16.
Collateral References.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 524-532.
40-20-04. When city engineer or chief of police to be street commissioner.
In cities having no street commissioner, the city engineer shall perform the duties and have the authority of street commissioner, and in cities having no street commissioner or city engineer, the chief of police shall perform the duties and have the authority of street commissioner.
Source:
S.L. 1933, ch. 169, §§ 1, 2; R.C. 1943, § 40-2004.
40-20-05. Chief of police and police officers — Powers and duties — Hot pursuit.
- The chief of police shall perform duties prescribed by the governing body for the preservation of the peace. The chief of police may administer oaths to police officers under the chief’s supervision. Within the city limits, and for a distance of one and one-half miles [2.41 kilometers] in all directions outside the city limits, the police officers of the city shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of peace officers as defined and prescribed by the laws of this state.
- A police officer in “hot pursuit” may continue beyond the one and one-half mile [2.41 kilometers] limit to make an arrest, in obedience to a warrant or without a warrant under the conditions of section 29-06-15, if obtaining the aid of peace officers having jurisdiction beyond that limit would cause a delay permitting escape. As used in this subsection, “hot pursuit” means the immediate pursuit of an individual endeavoring to avoid arrest. The jurisdiction limits in subsection 1 do not apply to a police officer acting pursuant to a joint powers agreement with another jurisdiction.
- Police officers shall serve and execute any warrant, writ, process, order, or notice issued by a municipal judge within the city in any civil or criminal action or proceeding for or on account of a violation of any city ordinance or in any action or proceeding in which the city is a party or is interested beneficially. The police, within the limits prescribed in this section, may serve and execute all writs and process issued by justices in civil actions. In addition to the duties set out in this section, the police shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by ordinance or statute.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 12, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2249; R.C. 1899, § 2249; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 107; R.C. 1905, § 2740; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3664; R.C. 1943, § 40-2005; S.L. 1971, ch. 393, § 1; 1977, ch. 378, § 1; 2017, ch. 87, § 3, eff April 5, 2017.
Cross-References.
Appointment of chief of police by mayor, see § 40-08-27.
Hospitalization and nursing for police department, see § 40-45-24.
Hours of duty of policemen in cities over ten thousand population, see § 40-45-25.
Jurisdiction of city governing body, see § 40-06-01.
Police pensions in cities, see ch. 40-45.
Notes to Decisions
Failure to Stop.
Evidence of a failure to stop in the presence of police vehicle emergency lights and siren supports by a preponderance of the evidence the finding that the failure to stop was an endeavor to avoid arrest for purposes of N.D.C.C. 40-20-05(2). Maher v. North Dakota Dep't of Transp., 510 N.W.2d 601, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 11 (N.D. 1994).
Jurisdiction for Police Stop.
Although the observation and stop of defendant’s vehicle occurred outside his geographical jurisdiction as the Casselton Chief of Police, the chief was vested with jurisdiction under section 44-08-20(3) by a highway patrolman’s request for assistance in stopping the suspect’s vehicle. State v. Graven, 530 N.W.2d 328, 1995 N.D. LEXIS 64 (N.D. 1995).
In a prosecution of defendant for driving under the influence, the district court erred in denying defendant’s suppression motion, where the record lacked sufficient competent evidence to establish a police officer stopped defendant’s vehicle within the officer’s geographical jurisdiction. There was no evidence that the officer was in hot pursuit of the vehicle driven by defendant as that term was defined by N.D.C.C. § 40-20-05(2), nor was there evidence that the officer was assisting other law enforcement officers at the time he stopped the vehicle. State v. Demars, 2007 ND 145, 738 N.W.2d 486, 2007 N.D. LEXIS 145 (N.D. 2007).
Sufficient competent evidence supported the district court's finding that hot pursuit permitted a University of North Dakota police officer to extend his capacity and authority to stop and arrest defendant. State v. Wilkie, 2017 ND 142, 895 N.W.2d 742, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 138 (N.D. 2017).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 179-190.
56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 190.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 450-534.
Liability of municipality or other governmental unit for failure to provide police protection, 46 A.L.R.3d 1084.
Law Reviews.
“A Comparison of Drinking and Driving Law in Norway and North Dakota: More Than a Difference in Penalties,” 76 N.D. L. Rev. 33 (2000).
40-20-06. Arrest by chief of police or policeman outside of city — Fees.
No chief of police or policeman shall receive any fee for going outside of the city to make an arrest for violation of a state law unless the board of county commissioners is satisfied that a delay in obtaining the sheriff or a sheriff’s deputy to make the arrest would have permitted an escape.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 12, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2250; R.C. 1899, § 2250; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 108; R.C. 1905, § 2741; C.L. 1913, § 3665; R.C. 1943, § 40-2006; S.L. 1985, ch. 151, § 28.
40-20-07. Municipalities to furnish blue uniforms to police officers.
Any municipality of this state which employs full-time police officers shall furnish each such police officer with a summer-weight and a winter-weight uniform. The uniforms must be blue in color.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 328, § 1.
CHAPTER 40-21 Municipal Elections
40-21-01. Qualified electors in municipal election — Restrictions.
Every resident of a municipality who is qualified to vote therein at general elections may vote at all municipal elections held therein. When elections are held by wards or precincts, a person may not vote in any place other than the ward or precinct of which the person is a resident.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 3; N.D. Const., § 121; R.C. 1895, § 2253; R.C. 1899, § 2253; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 111; R.C. 1905, § 2744; S.L. 1911, ch. 66; C.L. 1913, § 3668; R.C. 1943, § 40-2101.
Cross-References.
Elector moving from one precinct to another, voting place, see § 16.1-01-05.
Qualifications of electors, age and citizenship requirement, see N.D. Const., art. II, § 1, and § 16.1-01-04.
Notes to Decisions
- Delegation of Powers.
- Residence.
- Residence, Change of.
- Residence, Continuation.
- Residence, Proof of.
Delegation of Powers.
The whole subject of creating election districts and locating the polling places where the residents of the district may vote is with the legislature, and it may lawfully delegate this power to local authorities. Kerlin v. Devils Lake, 25 N.D. 207, 141 N.W. 756, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 119 (N.D. 1913).
Residence.
The good-faith intent of a voter to make a place his home for all purposes is an essential element entering into the determination of the question of residence. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
The place of one’s residence for the purpose of voting is where he has his established home, the place where he is habitually present and to which he intends to return when he departs. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Residence, Change of.
The shortest absence coincident with an intention to change the residence defeats the right to vote at the former domicile. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Residence, Continuation.
A domicile once gained does not continue until a new one is acquired for voting purposes, nor does a right to vote at a particular poll or district continue until the right to vote elsewhere is shown. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Residence, Proof of.
Notwithstanding one may testify that his intention was to make his home in a certain place, if his acts are of a character to negative his declaration or inconsistent with it, the court will not be governed by his testimony concerning his intention. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
Collateral References.
Elections 59-94.
25 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 155 et seq.
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 27-46.
40-21-02. City elections — When held — Notice — Polls — Agreements with counties — Judges and inspectors.
Biennial municipal elections must be held on the second Tuesday in June in each even-numbered year.
- Thirty days before the filing deadline for candidate names to be printed on the ballot, an official notice of this deadline along with a list of the offices to appear on the ballot must be published in the official newspaper of the city as provided by section 40-01-09.
- Ten days’ notice of the time and place of the election and of the offices to be filled at the election must be given by the city auditor by publication in the official newspaper of the city as provided by section 40-01-09.
- The governing body of a city shall enter into an agreement with the governing body of the county or counties in which the city lies concerning the use of a single canvassing board, the sharing of election personnel, the printing of election materials, the publishing of legal notices, and the apportioning of election expenses.
- For city elections that are not held under an agreement with any county, the governing body of the city shall appoint one inspector and two judges of election for each polling place in the city at least ten days before the election is held and the polls must be opened and closed as provided for the opening and closing of polls at statewide elections. In voting precincts in which over three hundred votes are cast in any previous election, the governing body may appoint two election clerks for each polling place. For a city election that is not held under an agreement with any county in a precinct in which seventy-five or fewer votes were cast in the last city election, the governing body of the city may appoint one inspector and one judge for each polling place.
- When a city enters into an agreement with the county to hold the city election in conjunction with the county election, the deadline for giving notice of the city election along with the offices to be filled at the election may be adjusted in order to meet the publishing requirements of the county. Each city governing body that enters into an agreement with the county must notify the county auditor, in writing, immediately after the candidate filing deadline on the sixty-fourth day before the election of the offices to be filled at the election and any measures to appear on the ballot.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 14; 1911, ch. 77, § 14; C.L. 1913, § 3784; S.L. 1919, ch. 120, § 1; 1923, ch. 171, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3784; S.L. 1941, ch. 149, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2102; S.L. 1957, ch. 152, § 3; 1957 Supp., § 40-2102; S.L. 1965, ch. 287, § 1; 1967, ch. 158, § 98; 1971, ch. 394, § 1; 1977, ch. 375, § 6; 1983, ch. 458, § 1; 1991, ch. 442, § 15; 1995, ch. 390, § 1; 1997, ch. 162, § 3; 1999, ch. 208, § 6; 2001, ch. 179, § 6; 2005, ch. 185, § 15; 2009, ch. 180, § 27; 2013, ch. 169, § 8; 2013, ch. 176, § 21.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 8 of chapter 169, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 21 of chapter 176, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 27 of chapter 180, S.L. 2009 became August 1, 2009.
The 2005 amendment of this section by section 15 of chapter 185, S.L. 2005 became effective August 1, 2005.
Note.
Section 40-21-02 was amended 2 times by the 2013 Legislative Assembly. Pursuant to section 1-02-09.1, the section is printed above to harmonize and give effect to the changes made in section 8 of chapter 169, Session Laws 2013, House Bill 1361; and section 2 of chapter 176, Session Laws 2013, Senate Bill 2374.
Cross-References.
Designation of polling places, see § 40-21-03.1.
Election officers generally, see ch. 16.1-05.
Opening and closing of polls, see § 16.1-01-03.
Notes to Decisions
Selection of Inspectors.
The power to appoint the election inspectors is vested in the city commission, and not in any one member thereof selected by lot. McCurdy v. Lucas, 34 N.D. 613, 159 N.W. 22, 1916 N.D. LEXIS 56 (N.D. 1916).
Collateral References.
Elections 29-45.
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 265 et seq
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 127-147.
40-21-03. Elections in council cities — Polling places — Polls open — Notice — Judges, clerks, and inspectors — Agreements with counties. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 390, § 3.
40-21-03.1. Designation of polling places for municipal elections.
The governing body of any city at the time of calling any general or special municipal election, or prior to the time of registration for said election, if such registration is required by law, when officers of said city are not to be elected by wards or districts, may by resolution designate such voting precincts and polling places for said election as it may deem necessary for the conduct of the same and shall in giving notice of said election designate such voting precincts and polling places.
Source:
S.L. 1977, ch. 379, § 1.
Cross-References.
Designation of polling places after change of wards, see § 40-52-07.
Designation of voting places under general election law, see § 16.1-04-02.
40-21-04. Annual election held in villages — Board of trustees to be inspectors. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 285.
40-21-05. Compensation of inspectors, judges, and clerks at municipal elections.
Each inspector, judge, or clerk of any regular or special municipal election shall receive compensation as determined for election officials in section 16.1-05-05. The amounts determined to be due election officials at municipal elections shall be paid from the funds of the municipality holding the election. In the event a special municipal election is held on the same date as a statewide, districtwide, or countywide election, and if the same election officials perform services for both elections, the city shall not be required to pay the election officials, except for any extra officials necessary for such special municipal election.
Source:
S.L. 1929, ch. 124, § 1; 1933, ch. 109, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2105; S.L. 1949, ch. 264, § 1; 1957, ch. 157, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-2105; S.L. 1971, ch. 396, § 1; 1973, ch. 328, § 1; 1979, ch. 226, § 2.
40-21-06. Reference to party ballot or affiliation in petition of candidate for municipal office prohibited.
No reference may be made to a party ballot nor to the party affiliation of a candidate in a petition to be filed by or in behalf of a candidate for nomination to a public office in any incorporated city in this state.
Source:
S.L. 1913, ch. 73, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 902; R.C. 1943, § 40-2106; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 136; 1995, ch. 391, § 1.
40-21-07. Petition for nomination of elective official in cities — Signatures required — Withdrawal of petition — Contents.
A candidate for any public office in an incorporated city may be nominated by filing with the city auditor, before four p.m. on the sixty-fourth day before the holding of the election, a petition signed by not less than ten percent of the number of qualified electors who voted for that office in the last city election. A candidate shall also file a statement of interests as required by section 16.1-09-02. If multiple candidates were elected to the office at the preceding city election at which the office was voted upon, the number of signatures must equal at least ten percent of the total votes cast for all candidates divided by the number of candidates that were to be elected to that office at that election. Qualified electors who sign a petition must reside within the ward or precinct in and for which that officer is to be elected, if the election is by wards, or within the corporate limits of the city, if the officer is elected at large. In cities operating under the commission system of government the required petition may be signed by the qualified electors at large residing within the city. If a petition is mailed, it must be in the possession of the city auditor before four p.m. on the sixty-fourth day before the holding of the election. However, no more than three hundred signatures may be required and the signatures may be on separate sheets of paper. Petitions must meet the specifications of nominating petitions pursuant to section 16.1-11-16. If a city election is not combined with a state or county election according to section 40-21-02, a candidate may be nominated by filing the required petition with the city auditor before four p.m. on the sixty-fourth day before the holding of the election. A candidate may withdraw the candidate’s nominating petition at any time before the applicable deadlines for filing nominating petitions provided for in this section. Nominating petitions required by this section may not be circulated or signed prior to January first preceding the election. Any signatures to a nominating petition obtained before that date may not be counted. A nominating petition for a special election may not be circulated or signed more than thirty days before the time when a petition for a special election must be filed. A candidate for city council may run for either the office of mayor or council member but not both in the same election. A candidate for the city commission may run for either the office of city commissioner or the office of president of the board of city commissioners but not both in the same election. A candidate may run for only one office in a city at any given election.
Source:
S.L. 1913, ch. 73, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 903; R.C. 1943, § 40-2107; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 99; 1967, ch. 323, § 137; 1971, ch. 397, § 1; 1971, ch. 398, § 1; 1985, ch. 235, § 84; 1991, ch. 215, § 2; 1993, ch. 185, § 2; 1995, ch. 390, § 2; 1999, ch. 208, § 7; 2001, ch. 179, § 7; 2005, ch. 189, § 3; 2007, ch. 350, § 2; 2009, ch. 180, § 28; 2013, ch. 176, § 22.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 22 of chapter 176, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 28 of chapter 180, S.L. 2009 became August 1, 2009.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 2 of chapter 350, S.L. 2007 became effective August 1, 2007.
The 2005 amendment of this section by section 3 of chapter 189, S.L. 2005 became effective August 1, 2005.
Notes to Decisions
Computing the Filing Period.
For purposes of computing the number of days for filing of a petition prior to election, election day should be included and the day on which the petition was filed excluded. Phillips v. Johnson, 50 N.D. 781, 197 N.W. 879, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 31 (N.D. 1924).
Collateral References.
Elections 140-145.
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 195-198.
40-21-08. Ballots in municipalities — Arrangement.
The auditor of the city shall place only the names of the persons nominated upon the ballot. The auditor shall arrange the offices upon the ballot in the order in which they are named in the statutes. The auditor shall determine the arrangement of the names of the candidates upon the ballot by conducting a drawing immediately after the candidate filing deadline on the sixty-fourth day before the election. The city auditor shall set the date, time, and location for conducting the drawing and shall give advance notice of the drawing to the candidates involved.
Source:
S.L. 1913, ch. 73, § 2; C.L. 1913, § 903; R.C. 1943, § 40-2108; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 138; 1995, ch. 391, § 2; 1997, ch. 352, § 1; 2013, ch. 176, § 23.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 23 of chapter 176, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
Collateral References.
Elections 160-195.
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 283-297.
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 260, 262-281.
40-21-09. Election districts in council cities — Division and consolidation by ordinance — Ballots to be kept separate by wards.
Each city operating under the council form of government in which council members are elected at large constitutes an election district or voting precinct, and in all other cities each ward constitutes an election district or voting precinct. Whenever the number of electors in any two or more contiguous wards does not exceed one hundred as determined by the number of votes cast at the last city election, the council, by ordinance, may consolidate those two or more wards into one precinct for voting purposes. In any city containing less than four hundred electors as determined by the number of votes cast at the last city election, the council, by ordinance, may consolidate all the wards of the city into one precinct for voting purposes. An ordinance dividing or consolidating wards must be passed and takes effect before the time of giving notice of the election. Wards and precincts established under this section constitute election districts for all state, county, and city elections. In city elections, separate ballot boxes and pollbooks must be provided and kept for each precinct. The terms “wards”, “precincts”, and “election districts” have the same meaning except where two or more wards are consolidated into one precinct for voting purposes or where one ward is divided into more than one precinct for voting purposes. This section does not prohibit the use of one building as the election polling place for more than one ward or the installation of electronic voting systems from separate wards in one building.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 2; R.C. 1895, § 2252; S.L. 1897, ch. 40, § 5; R.C. 1899, § 2252; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 110; R.C. 1905, § 2743; S.L. 1911, ch. 65; C.L. 1913, § 3667; R.C. 1943, § 40-2109; S.L. 1967, ch. 158, § 100; 1971, ch. 399, § 1; 1979, ch. 445, § 1; 1991, ch. 440, § 19; 2003, ch. 171, § 32.
Cross-References.
Dividing cities into precincts, see § 16.1-04-01.
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Polling Place.
Under R.C. 1905, § 2743, it was the duty of the city authorities to provide for and operate a polling place at some place within each ward. Kerlin v. Devils Lake, 25 N.D. 207, 141 N.W. 756, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 119 (N.D. 1913).
40-21-10. Registration of voters.
The governing body of any city may require the registration of voters in any election held or conducted within the municipality at such time and place or places as the governing body may designate.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 3; N.D. Const., § 121; R.C. 1895, § 2253; R.C. 1899, § 2253; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 111; R.C. 1905, § 2744; S.L. 1911, ch. 66; C.L. 1913, § 3668; R.C. 1943, § 40-2110; S.L. 1947, ch. 292, § 1; 1951, ch. 264, § 1; 1953, ch. 255, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2110; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 139.
Collateral References.
Validity of college or university regulation of political or voter registration activity in student housing facilities, 39 A.L.R.4th 1137.
40-21-11. Clerks appointed to fill vacancies — Oath, powers, and duties of judges and clerks of municipal elections.
When necessary, the judges of election at a municipal election shall appoint clerks to fill vacancies. The judges and clerks of a municipal election shall take the same oath and have the same powers and authority as judges and clerks of general state elections.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 5; R.C. 1895, § 2255; R.C. 1899, § 2255; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 113; R.C. 1905, § 2746; C.L. 1913, § 3670; R.C. 1943, § 40-2111.
Cross-References.
Election officers generally, see ch. 16.1-05.
40-21-12. Counting ballots — Returns — Canvass of returns by governing body of municipality. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 185, § 18.
40-21-13. Municipal elections to be governed by rules applicable to county elections — Absent voting.
The manner of conducting, voting at, keeping poll lists, and canvassing votes at municipal elections, recounts, and contests of the results of the elections is governed, as nearly as possible and except as otherwise provided in this chapter, by the laws of this state applicable to elections and contests in the case of county officers. Absent voters’ ballots must be available in municipal elections in accordance with chapter 16.1-07.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 5; R.C. 1895, § 2255; R.C. 1899, § 2255; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 113; R.C. 1905, § 2746; C.L. 1913, § 3670; R.C. 1943, § 40-2113; S.L. 1965, ch. 160, § 17; 1983, ch. 82, § 80; 1991, ch. 212, § 5; 1997, ch. 201, § 3.
Cross-References.
Contest of elections, see ch. 16.1-16.
Notes to Decisions
Determining Mayoral Contest.
The district court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a contest over the election of the mayor of a city. Nelson v. Gass, 27 N.D. 357, 146 N.W. 537, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1914).
40-21-14. City auditor to notify of election or appointments.
The city auditor, within five days after the result of an election is declared or the appointment of an officer is made within the municipality, shall notify each person elected or appointed to municipal office of that person’s election or appointment. Within the same period of time, the city auditor shall also notify the state supreme court of the election or the appointment of any municipal judge or alternate judge.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 8; R.C. 1895, § 2257; R.C. 1899, § 2257; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 115; R.C. 1905, § 2748; C.L. 1913, § 3672; R.C. 1943, § 40-2114; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 141; 1987, ch. 375, § 15.
40-21-15. New election upon failure to elect.
If there is a failure to elect an officer required to be elected, the governing body of the municipality may order a new election.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 9; R.C. 1895, § 2258; R.C. 1899, § 2258; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 116; R.C. 1905, § 2749; C.L. 1913, § 3673; R.C. 1943, § 40-2115.
40-21-16. Special elections conducted in same manner as general elections.
Special municipal elections to fill vacancies or for any other purpose must be held and conducted by the inspectors and judges of election of the several polling places in the same manner and the returns must be made in the same form and manner as at regular municipal elections.
Source:
S.L. 1907, ch. 45, § 34; 1911, ch. 77, § 34; C.L. 1913, § 3804; R.C. 1943, § 40-2116; 2013, ch. 169, § 9.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 9 of chapter 169, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
40-21-16.1. City canvassing board — Composition.
For any city election not held in conjunction with a county election, the city canvassing board must be composed of the city auditor, city attorney, mayor or commission president, and two members of the city commission or council, or appointed replacements for any of these officials. An individual who served on an election board during the election may not serve as a representative on the canvassing board for that same election. The city canvassing board must be comprised of at least five members.
Source:
S.L. 2011, ch. 294, § 4.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 4 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011 became effective April 4, 2011, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 6 of chapter 294, S.L. 2011.
40-21-17. Highest number of votes elects in municipal election — Procedure on tie vote.
The person having the highest number of votes for any municipal office shall be declared elected to such office. In case of a tie vote in the election of any municipal officer, a recount must be conducted pursuant to section 16.1-16-01. If a recount results in a tie vote, the choice must be determined by a drawing of names in the presence of the governing body of the municipality and in a manner it directs. A candidate involved in a tie vote may withdraw the candidate’s name from consideration if the candidate is willing to sign a statement to that effect in the presence of and witnessed by the filing officer of the election. If no candidates remain, the office is to be filled according to the rules for filling an office when a vacancy exists.
Source:
Pol. C. 1877, ch. 24, § 16; S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 13, § 7; R.C. 1895, §§ 2256, 2359; R.C. 1899, §§ 2256, 2359; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 114; R.C. 1905, §§ 2747, 2858; C.L. 1913, §§ 3671, 3855; S.L. 1915, ch. 268, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3855; R.C. 1943, § 40-2117; S.L. 1983, ch. 239, § 6; 1997, ch. 201, § 4; 2005, ch. 191, § 26.
Effective Date.
The 2005 amendment of this section by section 26 of chapter 191, S.L. 2005 became effective August 1, 2005.
Collateral References.
Elections 237, 238.
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 374-380.
29 C.J.S. Elections, §§ 396-400.
CHAPTER 40-22 Improvements by Special Assessment Method
40-22-01. Power of municipalities to defray expense of improvements by special assessments.
Any municipality, upon complying with the provisions of this chapter, may defray the expense of any or all of the following types of improvements by special assessments:
- The construction of a water supply system, or a sewerage system, or both, or any part thereof, or any improvement thereto or extension or replacement thereof, including the construction and erection of wells, intakes, pumping stations, settling basins, filtration plants, standpipes, water towers, reservoirs, water mains, sanitary and storm sewer mains and outlets, facilities for the treatment and disposal of sewage and other municipal, industrial, and domestic wastes, and all other appurtenances, contrivances, and structures used or useful for a complete water supply and sewerage system.
- The improvement of the municipal street system and any part thereof, including any one or more of the processes of acquisition, opening, widening, grading, graveling, paving, repaving, surfacing with tar, asphalt, bituminous, or other appropriate material, resurfacing, resealing, and repairing of any street, highway, avenue, alley, or public place within the municipality, and the construction and reconstruction of overhead pedestrian bridges, pedestrian tunnels, storm sewers, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and service connections for water and other utilities, and the installation, operation, and maintenance of streetlights and all types of decorative streetlighting, including but not restricted to Christmas streetlighting decorations.
- The improvement of boulevards and other public places by the planting of trees, the construction of grass plots and the sowing of grass seed therein, and the maintenance and preservation of such improvements by the watering of such trees and grass, the cutting of such grass, and the trimming of such trees, or otherwise in any manner which may appear necessary and proper to the governing body of the municipality.
- The acquiring of the necessary land and easements and the construction of the necessary works, within and without the municipality, for flood protection of properties within the municipality.
- The acquiring or leasing of the necessary property and easements and the construction of parking lots, ramps, garages, and other facilities for motor vehicles.
In planning an improvement project of a type specified in any one of the foregoing subsections, the governing body may include in such plans any and all items of work and materials which in its judgment are necessary or reasonably incidental to the completion of an improvement project of such type.
Source:
S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 4; 1899, ch. 41, § 6; 1899, ch. 42, § 1; R.C. 1899, §§ 2326f, 2326u, 2326x; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 137, 141; R.C. 1905, §§ 2772, 2776; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, §§ 1, 3; 1913, ch. 74, §§ 1, 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3698, 3702; R.C. 1943, § 40-2201; S.L. 1947, ch. 286, § 1; 1949, ch. 267, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2201; S.L. 1959, ch. 306, § 1; 1963, ch. 293, § 1; 1967, ch. 329, § 1; 1971, ch. 400, § 1.
Cross-References.
Gravel surfacing streets by special assessment, see ch. 40-54.
Park commissioners, powers relating to improvements, see §§ 40-49-12, 40-49-18.
Parking facilities, special assessments for, see §§ 40-60-02, 40-61-03.1.
Residential paving projects, see ch. 40-56.
Notes to Decisions
- Constitutionality.
- Basis of Assessment.
- Debt Limit.
- Deficiencies in Collection.
- Delegation of Powers.
- Legislative Authority.
- Park Commission Jurisdiction.
- Parking Space.
- Railroad Property.
- Street Improvements.
Constitutionality.
It is within the power of the assembly of a state to create special taxing districts, and to charge the cost of a local improvement to the property in such districts, either according to valuation or to superficial area or frontage. Webster v. Fargo, 181 U.S. 394, 21 S. Ct. 623, 45 L. Ed. 912, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1371 (U.S. 1901).
This chapter is constitutional. Fisher v. Minot, 188 N.W.2d 745, 1971 N.D. LEXIS 193 (N.D. 1971).
Basis of Assessment.
The fact that an assessment was spread uniformly over a large area is not conclusive that it was arbitrarily made or that there was no attempt to distribute the burden in proportion to the benefits. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. v. City of Minot, 51 N.D. 313, 199 N.W. 875, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 180 (N.D. 1924).
The mere fact that the burden of the cost of a public improvement is divided between various properties in proportion to the front footage is not in itself proof of an arbitrary assessment or one made regardless of benefits. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. v. City of Minot, 51 N.D. 313, 199 N.W. 875, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 180 (N.D. 1924).
Improvements may benefit property although the full fruition of such benefit is postponed or the present use of the property is of such character as not to be materially affected by such improvements. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
It was error to conclude N.D.C.C. § 40-22-15 gave a property owner no right to protest a city's creation of an improvement district because (1) the district included street repairs, utilities and other items not included in the description of a water or sewer improvement under N.D.C.C. § 40-22-01(1), and (2) it was unknown if the other repairs were incidental to water and sewer repairs, so it could not be concluded with certainty that the property owner's complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Nandan, LLP v. City of Fargo, 2015 ND 37, 858 N.W.2d 892, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 42 (N.D. 2015).
Debt Limit.
The issuance of bonds by a city only for the purpose of funding special assessments does not create a debt within the meaning of the constitutional provision requiring a vote of electors to increase the debt limit, where the bonds are to be paid by funds to be collected by special assessment. Schieber v. Mohall, 66 N.D. 593, 268 N.W. 445, 1936 N.D. LEXIS 206 (N.D. 1936).
Deficiencies in Collection.
Permitting or requiring the city to assume certain deficiencies that may arise in the collection of assessments against private property does not invade the constitutional rights of general taxpayers of the city. Marks v. Mandan, 70 N.D. 474, 296 N.W. 39, 1941 N.D. LEXIS 191 (N.D. 1941).
Delegation of Powers.
The legislature, in the exercise of its general powers, may direct that the cost of local improvements be assessed upon property benefited, and may delegate this power to municipalities. Ellison v. La Moure, 30 N.D. 43, 151 N.W. 988, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 99 (N.D. 1915), writ of error dismissed, 245 U.S. 628, 38 S. Ct. 62, 62 L. Ed. 519, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1703 (U.S. 1917); Boynton v. Board of City Comm'rs, 54 N.D. 795, 211 N.W. 441, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1926).
Legislative Authority.
The legislature, in the exercise of its general powers, may direct, subject to constitutional restrictions, that the cost of local improvements be assessed upon property benefited, and this power may be delegated to municipalities. Fisher v. Minot, 188 N.W.2d 745, 1971 N.D. LEXIS 193 (N.D. 1971).
Park Commission Jurisdiction.
Where power to pave and levy special assessments for improvement of street alongside park is conferred on park commission, governing body of city is without authority to levy special assessment or authorize paving. City of Fargo v. Gearey, 33 N.D. 64, 156 N.W. 552, 1916 N.D. LEXIS 70 (N.D. 1916).
Parking Space.
The provision of parking space in the vicinity of a congested mercantile area is a special benefit to the businesses in that area and is sufficient to justify a special assessment. Northern Pac. Ry. v. Grand Forks, 73 N.W.2d 348, 1955 N.D. LEXIS 153 (N.D. 1955).
Railroad Property.
Railroad right-of-way property may be assessed for any special benefits accruing to it by reason of the laying of water mains or the construction of sewers. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. v. City of Minot, 51 N.D. 313, 199 N.W. 875, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 180 (N.D. 1924).
Railroad property can properly be assessed for special improvements. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
Street Improvements.
The statutes granting cities the power to widen, pave, and otherwise improve streets and avenues are mandatory and not merely directory. The provisions prescribe the method of procedure to be followed and must be strictly observed. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Payment for Improvements.
A city was authorized to make improvements and to reimburse itself through special assessments but was not restricted so as to require it to contract for payment of such special improvements only out of the particular fund realized from special assessments. Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of Fargo, 12 N.D. 360, 96 N.W. 357 (1903), decided prior to the enactment of Session Laws 1905, Chapter 62 (see now N.D.C.C. § 40-22-36).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 405-588.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 1 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1116-1421.
Cotenancy as factor in determining representation of property owners in petition for public improvement, 3 A.L.R.2d 127.
Law Reviews.
Powers and Procedures of City and Village Governing Boards, 31 N.D. L. Rev. 137 (1955).
40-22-01.1. Restoration of property damaged in flood control or during a declared disaster or emergency — Special assessments for costs.
When any city has constructed any temporary emergency flood control protection devices or works to protect property located within a portion of a city from flood damage or expended funds for the protection of the city from flood or other peril under chapter 37-17.1 or otherwise, the city may maintain and remove material used in the construction of the temporary emergency flood control protection devices or works and the repair damages to land, buildings, or personal property caused by the operation of its equipment upon the property while in the process of installing or removing the temporary emergency flood protection systems. The city may create by resolution of its governing board a special assessment district encompassing the protected area. Special assessments against the property within the district must be imposed to cover the costs incurred by the city in constructing and maintaining the emergency flood protection devices or works and in removing the material used and in repairing the damages caused by the operation of equipment while installing or removing the temporary emergency flood protection systems. The amount to be assessed must be established by a resolution adopted by the governing board. Special assessments against any property in the district must be determined and made in the same manner as is provided for improvements by special assessments to the extent consistent herewith, and the certification and collection, including lien provisions, applicable to other special assessments are applicable hereto. Provided, however, that the provisions of sections 40-22-15, 40-22-17, and 40-22-18, relating to a resolution of necessity and protests against special assessments, sections 40-22-10, 40-22-11, and 40-22-29, relating to engineers’ reports, plans, and estimates, and section 40-22-19, relating to contract proposals, do not apply to special assessment districts created under this section.
Source:
S.L. 1971, ch. 401, § 1; 2013, ch. 270, § 4.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 4 of chapter 270, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
40-22-01.2. Municipal policy providing special assessment determination methods for allocation of assessments among and within classes of property.
Within five months of this section becoming applicable to a city, the governing body of each city with a population exceeding ten thousand shall adopt written policies, after a public hearing for consideration of the policies, which will be applied for cost allocation among properties benefited by a special assessment project. Policies established under this section must provide separately the policy that will be applied for cost allocation for each kind of special assessment and the cost allocation method for residential, commercial, and agricultural property and for any property subject to separate or special assessment factors or assessment rates.
History. S.L. 2015, ch. 281, § 1, eff August 1, 2015.
Effective Date.
This section became effective August 1, 2015.
Notes to Decisions
In General.
Special assessment commission determined that the improvements benefited the owner’s properties in the amount assessed to them under the city’s policy, and the assessments did not exceed the benefits; the city did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably in determining the benefits and assessments to the owner’s properties. Despite the city’s difficulty in explaining the determination of benefits, the assessments satisfied the statute. Holter v. City of Mandan, 2020 ND 152, 946 N.W.2d 524, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 169 (N.D. 2020), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 141 S. Ct. 1515, 209 L. Ed. 2d 254, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 1334 (U.S. 2021).
40-22-01.3. Power of municipality to defray expense of improvements — Infrastructure fee.
- Notwithstanding section 40-22-01, a municipality may levy and collect an infrastructure fee. The fee must replace a general special assessment on all property for payment of infrastructure maintenance costs through a utility bill issued by a municipality. The money collected under this subsection may not be used for any purpose other than infrastructure maintenance costs. If a municipality levies an infrastructure fee, the municipality also may levy and collect green field special assessments.
-
As used in this section:
- “General special assessments” means special assessments levied for the purpose of maintaining existing roads and infrastructure and special assessments levied for the construction or repair of arterial roads and infrastructure that provide a benefit to the entire community.
- “Green field special assessments” means special assessments levied for infrastructure costs associated with the development of agricultural or undeveloped property.
Source:
S.L. 2021, ch. 303, § 4, eff July 1, 2021.
40-22-02. Sewerage system — Establishment, maintenance, and alteration — Vote required.
The governing body of any municipality may establish, maintain, and alter a general system of sewerage for the municipality in such manner and under such regulations as it shall deem expedient and proper. No action shall be taken for the establishment of a sewerage system except upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members of the governing body. When a sewerage system is established, all measures necessary for the construction of sewers as a part of that system may be taken by a vote of the majority of the governing body.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 1; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2315; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 1; R.C. 1899, §§ 2315, 2326a; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 136; R.C. 1905, § 2771; S.L. 1907, ch. 229, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3697; R.C. 1943, § 40-2202.
Notes to Decisions
- Liability of City for Damages.
- Liberal Construction.
- Necessity of Sewers, Determination.
- Prerequisites to Special Assessment.
Liability of City for Damages.
In constructing a sewer system, a city acts in its governmental capacity and the taking or damaging of private property occasioned thereby is a taking or damaging for public use and, where the right to take is acquired by contract, the right of the property owner to damages is satisfied by the contract and a later purchaser of the property has no right to damages arising from overflow of the sewer. Hamilton v. Bismarck, 71 N.D. 321, 300 N.W. 631, 1941 N.D. LEXIS 173 (N.D. 1941).
By casting its sewage into a river without proper and sufficient treatment over a long period of time, a city violates its duty and cannot rely on its immunity to protect it from responding in damages. Messer v. Dickinson, 71 N.D. 568, 3 N.W.2d 241, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 92 (N.D. 1942); Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen Ullin, 79 N.D. 495, 57 N.W.2d 588, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 57 (N.D. 1953).
Although a city has the legislative authority to empty its sewage into a river, that authority is limited by the duty resting upon the city to exercise its authority in a reasonable manner and to take all reasonable precautions against damaging private property. Messer v. Dickinson, 71 N.D. 568, 3 N.W.2d 241, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 92 (N.D. 1942); Conlon v. City of Dickinson, 72 N.D. 190, 5 N.W.2d 411, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 130 (N.D. 1942).
Liberal Construction.
The power to construct and maintain sewers should receive a liberal construction in favor of the municipality. Marks v. Mandan, 70 N.D. 474, 296 N.W. 39, 1941 N.D. LEXIS 191 (N.D. 1941).
Necessity of Sewers, Determination.
Generally, the city councils are the sole judges of the necessity of sewers and of the efficiency, durability, and adaptability of those already in existence. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
Prerequisites to Special Assessment.
The findings and the declaration of a council, which are based upon and which refer to plans, specifications, and estimates, are a prerequisite to the levying of a special assessment for the erection of a standpipe. Kvello v. Lisbon, 38 N.D. 71, 164 N.W. 305, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 15 (N.D. 1917).
40-22-03. Acquiring property for sewers, water mains, and water supply beyond corporate limits.
When it is necessary to conduct the sewage of a municipality beyond the municipal limits or to acquire a supply of water beyond such limits and to construct mains or aqueducts to conduct such water to the municipal limits, the governing body, by grant, purchase, or condemnation proceedings, may acquire private property over which to construct the sewer, or upon and over which to establish facilities for obtaining and storing such water supply and aqueducts or mains for conducting the same to the corporate limits. Public property may likewise be acquired for such purposes by grant or purchase from the government or public corporation owning the same. The cost of acquiring such property and of building such sewer or other facilities upon or over the property may be included in the cost of construction or acquisition of a municipal waterworks or sewerage system and in the special assessments levied therefor, or the entirety of such a project may be completed as an improvement to an existing waterworks or sewage system and special assessments may be levied therefor in accordance with the provisions of this title.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 1; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2315; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 1; R.C. 1899, §§ 2315, 2326a; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 136; R.C. 1905, § 2771; S.L. 1907, ch. 229, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3697; R.C. 1943, § 40-2203; S.L. 1951, ch. 263, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2203.
Notes to Decisions
Nuisance.
This statute does not authorize the creation and maintenance of a nuisance by the municipality. Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen Ullin, 79 N.D. 495, 57 N.W.2d 588, 1953 N.D. LEXIS 57 (N.D. 1953).
Collateral References.
Propriety of injunctive relief against diversion of water by municipal corporation or public utility, 42 A.L.R.3d 426.
40-22-04. Discharge of sewage — Regulations governing. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1975, ch. 575, § 2.
40-22-05. Condemnation of land and rights of way for special improvements — Taking of possession — Trial — Appeal — Vacation of judgment.
Whenever property required to make any improvement authorized by this chapter is to be taken by condemnation proceedings, the court, upon request by resolution of the governing body of the municipality making such improvement, shall call a special term of court for the trial of the proceedings and may summon a jury for the trial whenever necessary. The proceedings shall be instituted and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of chapter 32-15, except that when the interest sought to be acquired is a right of way for the opening, laying out, widening, or enlargement of any street, highway, avenue, boulevard, or alley in the municipality, or for the laying of any main, pipe, ditch, canal, aqueduct, or flume for conducting water, storm water, or sewage, whether within or without the municipality, the municipality may make an offer to purchase the right of way and may deposit the amount of the offer with the clerk of the district court of the county wherein the right of way is located, and may thereupon take possession of the right of way forthwith. The offer shall be made by resolution of the governing body of the municipality, a copy of which shall be attached to the complaint filed with said clerk of court in accordance with section 32-15-18. The clerk shall immediately notify the owner or owners of the land wherein the right of way is located of the deposit, by causing a notice to be appended to the summons when served and published in said proceedings as provided in the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, stating the amount deposited or agreed in the resolution to be deposited. The owner may thereupon appeal to the court by filing an answer to the complaint in the manner provided in the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, and may have a jury trial, unless a jury be waived, to determine the damages. However, upon due proof of the service of said notice and summons and upon deposit of the aggregate sum agreed in said resolution, the court may without further notice make and enter an order determining the municipality to be entitled to take immediate possession of the right of way. If under laws of the United States proceedings for the acquisition of any right of way are required to be instituted in or removed to a federal court, the proceedings may be taken in that court in the same manner and with the same effect as provided in this section and the clerk of the district court of the county in which the right of way is located shall perform any and all of the duties set forth in this section, if directed to do so by the federal court. The proceedings shall be determined as speedily as practicable. An appeal from a judgment in the condemnation proceedings shall be taken within sixty days after the entry of the judgment, and the appeal shall be given preference by the supreme court over all other civil cases except election contests. No final judgment in the condemnation proceedings awarding damages to property used by a municipality for street, sewer, or other purposes shall be vacated or set aside if the municipality shall pay to the defendant, or shall pay into court for the defendant, in cash, the amount so awarded. The municipality may levy special assessments to pay all or any part of the judgment and at the time of the next annual tax levy may levy a general tax for the payment of the part of the judgment as is not to be paid by special assessment. For the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the judgment, or for the deposit of the amount offered for purchase of a right of way as provided above, the municipality may issue warrants on the fund of the improvement district as provided in section 40-24-19, in anticipation of the levy and collection of special assessments and of any taxes or revenues to be appropriated to the fund in accordance with the provisions of this title. The warrants may be issued upon the commencement of the condemnation proceedings or at any time thereafter. Upon the failure of the municipality to make payment in accordance with this section, the judgment in the condemnation proceedings may be vacated.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 174; R.C. 1905, § 2812; C.L. 1913, § 3737; R.C. 1943, § 40-2205; S.L. 1961, ch. 274, § 1; 1981, ch. 91, § 31.
Notes to Decisions
Manner of Payment.
Fact that the city did make and levy a special assessment within the time required and did issue city warrants therefor did not grant to it any authority to evade the mandatory constitutional provision that payment in eminent domain proceedings must be made in money, either in court or to the owner. City of Minot v. Olson, 42 N.D. 246, 173 N.W. 458, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 156 (N.D. 1919).
Pedestrian Malls.
City exercising authority to create pedestrian malls pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 40-62-01 must initiate eminent domain proceedings to compensate abutting property owners since those owners are presumed to hold the fee ownership in the street. City of Fargo v. Fahrlander, 199 N.W.2d 30, 1972 N.D. LEXIS 155 (N.D. 1972).
Collateral References.
Eminent Domain 9, 12 et seq.
26 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, § 44 et seq.
Off-street public parking facilities, 8 A.L.R.2d 373.
Power to condemn abutting owner’s right of access to limited access highway or street, 43 A.L.R.2d 1072.
Validity, construction, and effect, of statutes authorizing eminent domain for urban redevelopment by private enterprise, 44 A.L.R.2d 1414, 1439.
Abutting owner’s right to damages for limitation of access caused by conversion of conventional road into limited-access highway, 43 A.L.R.2d 1072; 42 A.L.R.3d 13; 42 A.L.R.3d 148.
Measure and elements of damage for limitation of access caused by conversion of conventional road into limited-access highway, 42 A.L.R.3d 148.
Industrial park or similar development as public use justifying condemnation of private property, 62 A.L.R.4th 1183.
40-22-06. Agreement with state agency, county, water resource district, or federal agency for certain improvements.
Any municipality in this state, through its governing body, may enter into an agreement with any state agency, the board of county commissioners, or water resource board of the county in which the municipality is located, or a joint water resource board which jurisdiction includes the municipality, or any federal agency, or any combination thereof, for the improvement of streets, sewers, water mains, flood control projects, or of any of such facilities, under the terms of which the contract for such work is to be let by the state agency, the board of county commissioners, water resource board, joint water resource board, the federal agency, or any combination thereof, and for this purpose may create a special improvement district or districts. No such agreement may be entered into until and unless the governing body certifies that it has obtained authority in accordance with this section to issue improvement warrants to finance the amount that the municipality will be obligated to pay thereunder, over and above the amount of any bonds which have been voted and any other funds which are on hand and properly available for such purpose. If any portion of the cost is to be paid by the levy of special assessments, the governing body shall by resolution declare the necessity of the improvement, setting forth its general nature, the approximate amount or fraction of the cost which the municipality will be obligated to pay under the agreement, and the fact that this amount, or such lesser amount as the governing body may specify, is proposed to be paid by the levy of special assessments upon property determined to be benefited by the improvement. Any portion of the cost for which the municipality is obligated and which is not assessed upon benefited property or paid from other funds may be agreed to be paid by general taxation of all the taxable property in the municipality, if approval for the incurring of such debt is obtained and provision for the payment thereof is made in accordance with section 40-24-10. The resolution of necessity must be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality and protests may be filed and their sufficiency to bar the improvement must be determined in accordance with sections 40-22-16 through 40-22-18. However, if under the terms of the resolution of necessity the portion of the cost of the project to be assessed upon benefited property does not exceed twenty-five percent of the total cost to be paid by the state agency, county, water resource board, joint water resource board, federal agency, and municipality, written protests by the owners of seventy-five percent of the property liable to be assessed for the improvement shall be required to bar further proceedings with reference thereto. At any time after the period for filing protests has expired and the protests filed, if any, have been heard and determined to be insufficient, the governing body may issue warrants on the fund of the improvement in the total amount for which the municipality is obligated under the agreement, and may cause to be certified to the special assessment commission that portion of the cost to be borne by the property owners within the district, and the assessment of such amount may be made and such warrants may be issued as in other cases provided for in chapters 40-23 and 40-24.
Source:
S.L. 1941, ch. 203, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2206; S.L. 1963, ch. 294, § 1; 1967, ch. 330, § 1; 1987, ch. 492, § 1; 1995, ch. 443, § 5.
Notes to Decisions
Constitutionality.
Exclusion of property in urban renewal area from special assessment district created to provide funds for highway overpass does not violate article X, section 5 of the North Dakota Constitution, since that section does not relate to local assessments but only to general taxation. Chernick v. Grand Forks, 210 N.W.2d 73, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1973).
Authorized.
Frontage roads, drain improvements, and land for a drain were authorized improvements under the adopted resolution of necessity and the city did not fail to correctly interpret the law, nor did it abuse its discretion by including the costs of these improvements in the total cost of the project. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Improvement of Streets.
Construction of an overpass was an “improvement of streets” as used in this section and therefore city council did not exceed its jurisdiction in creating special assessment district for its financing. Parker Hotel Co. v. Grand Forks, 177 N.W.2d 764, 1970 N.D. LEXIS 103 (N.D. 1970).
Right to Protest.
Property owner could not protest a project under an agreement between a city and a water district, under N.D.C.C. § 40-22-06, because, under the agreement, the city had to bid out the project and enter into a construction contract, so the city did not have to adopt a resolution of necessity. Nandan, LLP v. City of Fargo, 2015 ND 37, 858 N.W.2d 892, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 42 (N.D. 2015).
40-22-06.1. Cities with population of over ten thousand may enter into agreement with highway department or county for certain improvements. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1963, ch. 294, § 2.
40-22-07. Dispensing with preliminary requirements in making improvements in conjunction with highway department or county. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1963, ch. 294, § 2.
40-22-08. Improvement districts to be created.
For the purpose of making an improvement project of one of the types specified in section 40-22-01 and defraying the cost thereof by special assessments, a municipality may create water districts, sewer districts, water and sewer districts, street improvement districts, boulevard improvement districts, flood protection districts, and parking districts, and may extend any such district when necessary. The appropriate special improvement district may be created by ordinance or resolution. The district shall be designated by a name appropriate to the type of improvement for the making of which it is created, and by a number distinguishing it from other improvement districts. Nothing herein, however, shall prevent a municipality from making and financing any improvement and levying special assessments therefor under any alternate procedure set forth in this title.
Source:
S.L. 1897, ch. 41, §§ 1, 4, 8; 1899, ch. 42, §§ 1, 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2326f, 2326u, 2326x; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 137, 141; R.C. 1905, §§ 2772, 2776; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, §§ 1, 3; 1913, ch. 74, §§ 1, 3; C.L. 1913, §§ 3698, 3702; R.C. 1943, § 40-2208; S.L. 1949, ch. 267, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-2208; S.L. 1959, ch. 306, § 2.
Cross-References.
Validation of proceedings taken prior to March 7, 1955 by cities over ten thousand for creation of improvement districts, notwithstanding certain defects, see § 1-06-06.
Notes to Decisions
- Constitutionality.
- Amount of Benefits.
- Discretion of City Commissioners.
- Extension of District.
- Jurisdiction.
- Jurisdictional Prerequisite.
- Purposes of District.
- Street Adjacent to Park.
- Sufficient Resolution.
- Types of Districts.
Constitutionality.
In creation of special assessment district to provide funds for highway overpass, inclusion of property which was to be “specially benefited” from overpass did not create an arbitrary classification and neither unreasonably nor invidiously discriminated against those property owners included in the district; exclusion of property in urban renewal area adjacent to proposed overpass did not invalidate special assessment district. Chernick v. Grand Forks, 210 N.W.2d 73, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1973).
Exclusion of property in urban renewal area from special assessment district created to provide funds for highway overpass does not violate article X, section 5 of the North Dakota Constitution, since that section does not relate to local assessments but only to general taxation. Chernick v. Grand Forks, 210 N.W.2d 73, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1973).
Amount of Benefits.
The amount of benefits resulting from the improvement is a question of fact, and, assuming that there has been a hearing thereon, the decision of the special assessment board is final. Ellison v. La Moure, 30 N.D. 43, 151 N.W. 988, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 99 (N.D. 1915), writ of error dismissed, 245 U.S. 628, 38 S. Ct. 62, 62 L. Ed. 519, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1703 (U.S. 1917).
Discretion of City Commissioners.
The size and the form of a special assessment district is a matter to be decided entirely by the city council, after consultation with the city engineer. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
The city council or commission is authorized to determine upon the necessity for the construction or alteration of sewers in the city. McKenzie v. Mandan, 35 N.D. 107, 160 N.W. 852, 1916 N.D. LEXIS 175 (N.D. 1916).
The city authorities have a wide discretion in determining the area of a proposed improvement district, but it is contemplated that they should exercise judgment and discretion in so doing. Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Devils Lake, 42 N.D. 445, 173 N.W. 748, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1919).
The discretion of the board of city commissioners as to the paving of streets is not subject to restraint by a court of equity. Hufford v. Flynn, 48 N.D. 33, 182 N.W. 941, 1921 N.D. LEXIS 3 (N.D. 1921).
Extension of District.
Where special improvement warrant had been issued, bonds had been sold, and improvement project substantially completed prior to annexation of other property into the district, there was no jurisdiction over the newly included property, and any special assessment against such property was void. Dakota Land Co. v. Fargo, 224 N.W.2d 810, 1974 N.D. LEXIS 141 (N.D. 1974).
Jurisdiction.
Property outside the limits of an improvement district is not subject to special assessment. Dakota Land Co. v. Fargo, 224 N.W.2d 810, 1974 N.D. LEXIS 141 (N.D. 1974).
Jurisdictional Prerequisite.
Before a public improvement which is to be paid for by special assessments may be undertaken, an improvement district must be created as a jurisdictional prerequisite. Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Devils Lake, 42 N.D. 445, 173 N.W. 748, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1919); Boynton v. Board of City Comm'rs, 54 N.D. 795, 211 N.W. 441, 1926 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1926).
If a special assessment district is not created before the making of a public improvement, special assessments levied for the payment of the improvement are invalid. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. v. City of Minot, 51 N.D. 313, 199 N.W. 875, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 180 (N.D. 1924).
The statutes granting cities the power to widen, pave, and otherwise improve streets and avenues are mandatory and not merely directory. The provisions prescribe the method of procedure to be followed and must be strictly observed. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Purposes of District.
Where the improvement is made for two or more of the purposes specified, such purposes must be common to all the areas embraced in the district in order to maintain its singleness and unity. Rybnicek v. Mandan, 93 N.W.2d 650, 1958 N.D. LEXIS 104, 1958 N.D. LEXIS 105 (N.D. 1958).
Where an improvement district embraces two or more of the purposes specified in this statute, the term “improvement” as used therein and in N.D.C.C. §§ 40-22-17 and 40-22-18, is not limited to one purpose, but includes all of the purposes for which the improvement district is created. Rybnicek v. Mandan, 93 N.W.2d 650, 1958 N.D. LEXIS 104, 1958 N.D. LEXIS 105 (N.D. 1958).
Street Adjacent to Park.
Governing body has no authority to levy special assessments or to authorize the paving of streets bordering upon and adjacent to a city park where power to pave and levy special assessments is conferred on park commission. City of Fargo v. Gearey, 33 N.D. 64, 156 N.W. 552, 1916 N.D. LEXIS 70 (N.D. 1916).
Sufficient Resolution.
The statute requires a resolution that refers intelligently to the plans and specifications, and a resolution that merely directs the city engineer to prepare plans and specifications is insufficient to comply with the statute. Kvello v. Lisbon, 38 N.D. 71, 164 N.W. 305, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 15 (N.D. 1917).
Types of Districts.
This statute authorizes the cities to create paving districts. Will v. Bismarck, 36 N.D. 570, 163 N.W. 550, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 213 (N.D. 1917).
The city council or board of city commissioners has authority to create sewer, water main, and waterworks districts. Hufford v. Flynn, 48 N.D. 33, 182 N.W. 941, 1921 N.D. LEXIS 3 (N.D. 1921).
40-22-09. Size and form of improvement districts — Regulations governing.
Any improvement district created by a municipality may embrace two or more separate property areas. Each improvement district shall be of such size and form as to include all properties which in the judgment of the governing body, after consultation with the engineer planning the improvement, will be benefited by the construction of the improvement project which is proposed to be made in or for such district, or by any portion or portions of such project. A single district may be created for an improvement of the type specified in any one of the subsections of section 40-22-01, notwithstanding any lack of uniformity among the types, items, or quantities of work and materials to be used at particular locations throughout the district. The jurisdiction of a municipality to make, finance, and assess the cost of any improvement project shall not be impaired by any lack of commonness, unity, or singleness of the location, purpose, or character of the improvement, or by the fact that any one or more of the properties included in the district is subsequently determined not to be benefited by the improvement, or by a particular portion thereof, and is not assessed therefor. There may be omitted from a water or sewer district, in the discretion of the governing body, properties within the corporate limits which are benefited by the improvement therein but do not abut upon a water or sewer main, without prejudice to the right and power of the municipality subsequently to assess such properties to the extent and in the manner permitted by law. The governing body may by resolution enlarge an improvement district in which an improvement is proposed or under construction upon receipt of a petition therefor signed by the owners of three-fourths of the area to be added to the district.
Source:
S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 5; 1899, ch. 41, § 7; R.C. 1899, §§ 2326g, 2326y; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 138 to 140; R.C. 1905, §§ 2773 to 2775; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 2; 1913, ch. 74, § 2; C.L. 1913, §§ 3699 to 3701; R.C. 1943, § 40-2209; S.L. 1949, ch. 267, § 3; 1957 Supp., § 40-2209; S.L. 1959, ch. 306, § 3; 1971, ch. 402, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
- Constitutionality.
- Discretion of Municipal Authorities.
- Error in Determination.
- Finality of Determination.
- Method of Assessment.
- Protests.
- Separate Property Area.
Constitutionality.
In creation of special assessment district to provide funds for highway overpass, inclusion of property which was to be “specially benefited” from overpass did not create an arbitrary classification and neither unreasonably nor invidiously discriminated against those property owners included in the district; exclusion of property in urban renewal area adjacent to proposed overpass did not invalidate special assessment district. Chernick v. Grand Forks, 210 N.W.2d 73, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1973).
Exclusion of property in urban renewal area from special assessment district created to provide funds for highway overpass does not violate article X, section 5 of the North Dakota Constitution since that section does not relate to local assessments but only to general taxation. Chernick v. Grand Forks, 210 N.W.2d 73, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1973).
Discretion of Municipal Authorities.
The size and the form of a special assessment district is a matter to be decided entirely by the city council, after consultation with the city engineer. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
The city council or board of city commissioners should exercise judgment and discretion in determining the area of a proposed improvement district. Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Devils Lake, 42 N.D. 445, 173 N.W. 748, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1919).
Error in Determination.
The fact that there may have been an error on the part of the special assessment commission as to the amount of any benefit or assessment is no ground for invalidating the entire proceeding. Reed v. Langdon, 78 N.D. 991, 54 N.W.2d 148, 1952 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1952).
Finality of Determination.
A court of equity will not interfere with the governing board’s determination of the size and form of an improvement district, in the absence of fraud, bad faith, arbitrary action, or abuse of discretion. Reed v. Langdon, 78 N.D. 991, 54 N.W.2d 148, 1952 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1952).
This section has expressly conferred upon the governing body of every city the legislative power and discretion to determine the size, form, and boundaries of an improvement district, and the judiciary will not interfere with the governing board’s legislative determination of the size, form, and boundaries of an improvement district in the absence of jurisdictional defects, fraud, or arbitrary action. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Method of Assessment.
Special assessment against property in parking districts conformed to statute where multilevel parking ramp constituted special benefit to each parcel of land within the district by providing off-street parking and developing and improving the economic base of the area; where the assessment was based upon a formula which took into account the proportionate needs of each parcel, the existing parking provided by that parcel and the nature and size of the business being conducted thereon, and where the assessment against each parcel was not in excess of the benefit derived from the improvement as properly determined by an impartial administrative agency. Patterson v. Bismarck, 212 N.W.2d 374, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 131 (N.D. 1973).
Protests.
A special-assessment (street-improvement) district which included only property lying within a single, continuous, closed boundary, with streets and avenues that formed a contiguous and interconnecting network, was one single area and written protests by less than a majority of the property owners did not meet the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 40-22-18 and would not bar improvements. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Separate Property Area.
The term “separate property area” as used in this section and N.D.C.C. § 40-22-18 means “a geographically separate or noncontiguous area”. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
40-22-10. Engineer’s report required — Contents.
-
After a special improvement district has been created, the governing body of a municipality, if the governing body deems it necessary to make any of the improvements set out in section 40-22-01 in the manner provided in this chapter, shall direct the engineer for the municipality, or some other competent engineer if the municipality does not have a competent municipal engineer, to prepare a report as to the general nature, purpose, and feasibility of the proposed improvement and an estimate of the probable cost of the improvement, including:
- A separate statement of the estimated cost of the work for which proposals must be advertised under section 40-22-19; and
- A separate statement of all other items of estimated cost not included under subsection 1 which are anticipated to be included in the cost of the improvement under sections 40-23-05 and 40-23.1-04.
- An engineer’s report under this section also must include information describing how the special assessment district was created including any considerations as to which properties are determined to receive a benefit from the proposed improvement.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 2; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2316; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, §§ 2316, 2326b; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 142; R.C. 1905, § 2777; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 4; 1913, ch. 74, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3703; R.C. 1943, § 40-2210; S.L. 1971, ch. 402, § 2; 2003, ch. 345, § 1; 2021, ch. 305, § 1, eff August 1, 2021.
Notes to Decisions
Authorized.
Frontage roads, drain improvements, and land for a drain were authorized improvements under the adopted resolution of necessity and the city did not fail to correctly interpret the law, nor did it abuse its discretion by including the costs of these improvements in the total cost of the project. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
40-22-11. Approval of plans, specifications, and estimates — Approval establishes grade of street.
At any time after receiving the engineer’s report required by section 40-22-10, the governing body may direct the engineer to prepare detailed plans and specifications for construction of the improvement. The plans and specifications shall be approved by a resolution of the governing body of the municipality. If the plans and specifications include the establishment of the grade of a street and such grade has not been established previously by ordinance, the resolution approving the plans, specifications, and estimates shall constitute an establishment of the grade.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 2; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2316; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, §§ 2316, 2326b; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 142; R.C. 1905, § 2777; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 4; 1913, ch. 74, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3703; R.C. 1943, § 40-2211; S.L. 1971, ch. 402, § 3.
40-22-12. Requirements of plans, specifications, and estimates when improvement is paving or beautification of streets.
If an improvement to be financed by special assessments consists in paving or repaving any street, alley, or public place, the governing body of the municipality may require the plans, specifications, and estimates for the improvement to be made for one kind of pavement or several different kinds of pavement as it may deem advisable. If the contemplated improvement consists of planting trees, constructing grass plots, sowing grass seed thereon, or otherwise parking or beautifying any of the streets, highways, avenues, alleys, lanes, or other public grounds within the municipal limits, the governing body may require the plans, specifications, and estimates to show the probable costs of making, constructing, or maintaining such improvements or any of them.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 2; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2316; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, §§ 2316, 2326b; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 142; R.C. 1905, § 2777; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 4; 1913, ch. 74, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3703; R.C. 1943, § 40-2212; S.L. 1949, ch. 268, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2212.
40-22-13. Municipal engineer to retain copy of plans, specifications, and estimates — Sale of copies.
The engineer acting for the municipality shall retain a copy of the plans, specifications, and estimates which have been prepared for any improvement on file in the engineer’s office. The engineer shall furnish to any person applying therefor copies of the same, and, if the engineer is an officer of the municipality, the engineer may charge one dollar an hour for the time necessarily employed in making such copies.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 2; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2316; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, §§ 2316, 2326b; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 142; R.C. 1905, § 2777; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 4; 1913, ch. 74, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3703; R.C. 1943, § 40-2213.
40-22-14. Plans, specifications, and estimates filed in office of city auditor.
The plans, specifications, and estimates shall be the property of the municipality and shall be filed in the office of the city auditor and shall remain on file in the city auditor’s office subject to inspection by any interested person.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 2; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2316; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, §§ 2316, 2326b; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 142; R.C. 1905, § 2777; S.L. 1911, ch. 70, § 4; 1913, ch. 74, § 4; C.L. 1913, § 3703; R.C. 1943, § 40-2214; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 142.
40-22-15. Resolution declaring improvements necessary — Exception for sewer and water improvements — Contents of resolution — Publication of resolution.
After the engineer’s report required by section 40-22-10 has been filed and approved, the governing body of the municipality, by resolution, shall declare that it is necessary to make the improvements described therein. However, a resolution is not required if the improvement constitutes a water or sewer improvement as described in subsection 1 of section 40-22-01, nor if the governing body determines by resolution that a written petition for the improvement, signed by the owners of a majority of the area of the property included within the district, has been received. The resolution must refer intelligibly to the engineer’s report and include a map of the municipality showing the proposed improvement districts. The resolution must then be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 143; R.C. 1905, § 2778; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3704; S.L. 1925, ch. 212, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3704; S.L. 1927, ch. 182, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2215; S.L. 1949, ch. 268, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-2215; S.L. 1971, ch. 402, § 4; 1975, ch. 375, § 1; 1981, ch. 415, § 1; 1985, ch. 458, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
- Mandatory Requirement.
- Notice.
- Power to Lay a Special Assessment.
- Sewer.
- Sufficiency of Resolution.
- When Statute Applies.
Mandatory Requirement.
The provision of this section requiring the passage of a resolution of necessity by the governing body of a city is mandatory and an indispensable prerequisite to further proceedings in connection with the creation of a public improvement to be paid for in whole or in part by special assessments. Mitchell v. Parshall, 108 N.W.2d 12, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 65 (N.D. 1961).
Notice.
Notice by publication of resolution of necessity for establishment of parking improvement district did not deprive property owners of constitutional rights. Fisher v. Minot, 188 N.W.2d 745, 1971 N.D. LEXIS 193 (N.D. 1971).
Publication of resolution declaring necessity for formation of special assessment district for parking improvement, was sufficient under due process clause; personal service on property owners within district was not necessary since all property affected was within two blocks of the improvement and owners had actual knowledge of the proposed improvement. Patterson v. Bismarck, 212 N.W.2d 374, 1973 N.D. LEXIS 131 (N.D. 1973).
City’s inadvertent failure to include a complete map of proposed street improvement project when publishing its second notice of resolution of necessity did not violate property owners’ due process rights. Serenko v. City of Wilton, 1999 ND 88, 593 N.W.2d 368, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 122 (N.D. 1999).
Because the landowners did not commence their action to invalidate assessments on the grounds that the city had not complied with the notice requirements of N.D.C.C. § 40-22-15 when creating an improvement district within 30 days of the adoption of the resolution awarding the sale of warrants, N.D.C.C. § 40-22-43 barred the action unless the proceedings violated a constitutional limitation or restriction. Paving Dist. 476 Grp., SPCM, LLC v. City of Minot, 2017 ND 176, 898 N.W.2d 418, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 167 (N.D. 2017).
Power to Lay a Special Assessment.
The foundation of the power to lay a special assessment for a local improvement of any character, including the improvement of a city street, is the benefit which the object of the assessment confers on the owner of the abutting property, or the owners of property in the assessment district, which is different from the general benefit which the owners enjoy in common with other inhabitants or citizens of the municipal corporation. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
It was error to conclude N.D.C.C. § 40-22-15 gave a property owner no right to protest a city's creation of an improvement district because (1) the district included street repairs, utilities and other items not included in the description of a water or sewer improvement under N.D.C.C. § 40-22-01(1), and (2) it was unknown if the other repairs were incidental to water and sewer repairs, so it could not be concluded with certainty that the property owner's complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Nandan, LLP v. City of Fargo, 2015 ND 37, 858 N.W.2d 892, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 42 (N.D. 2015).
Sewer.
“Sewer” as used in this section refers to both storm sewers and sanitary sewers and improvement or construction of such sewers is proper without a resolution of necessity as provided under this section, and the landowners cannot bar the project by filing protests. Kirkham, Michael & Assocs. v. Minot, 122 N.W.2d 862, 1963 N.D. LEXIS 100 (N.D. 1963).
Sufficiency of Resolution.
The statutes authorizing improvements to be paid for by special assessments must be strictly pursued, and the resolution of necessity must specifically designate the work to be done. McLauren v. Grand Forks, 43 N.W. 710, 6 Dakota 397, 1889 Dakota LEXIS 27 (Dakota 1889).
A resolution requiring the city engineer to prepare plans and specifications was insufficient to comply with this statute. Kvello v. Lisbon, 38 N.D. 71, 164 N.W. 305, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 15 (N.D. 1917).
Frontage roads, drain improvements, and land for a drain were authorized improvements under the adopted resolution of necessity and the city did not fail to correctly interpret the law, nor did it abuse its discretion by including the costs of these improvements in the total cost of the project. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
When Statute Applies.
This statute applies only where a street improvement is to be paid for by the levy of special assessments. City of Lidgerwood v. Michalek, 12 N.D. 348, 97 N.W. 541, 1903 N.D. LEXIS 50 (N.D. 1903).
When proceedings were had for the construction of curbing under S.L. 1917, ch. 72 (N.D.C.C. §§ 40-31-01 to 40-31-06), the requirements of resolution of necessity and publication were not applicable. Deuchscher v. Jamestown, 61 N.D. 314, 237 N.W. 814, 1931 N.D. LEXIS 277 (N.D. 1931).
40-22-16. Sewer or water improvements and parking lots in municipalities may be paid for by service charges.
A municipality constructing a sewer or water improvement or a parking lot under the special assessment method may resolve in the resolution or ordinance required by section 40-22-08 in the case of a sewer or water improvement, or in the resolution required by section 40-22-15 in the case of a parking lot, that a portion of the cost of the improvement shall be raised by service charges for the use of the improvement, and of the utility or parking system of which it forms a part. If the municipality so resolves, it may determine, in its resolutions, ordinances, and other proceedings relating to the levying of special assessments and the issuing of warrants to pay the cost of such improvement, that a specified portion or all of such cost shall be assessed specially against any property specially benefited and may cause to be assessed only the portion so determined. In such event the entire remainder of such cost, including interest as well as principal of any warrants issued, over and above the amount of special assessments actually collected and received from time to time in the fund of the improvement district, plus any general taxes pledged in accordance with section 40-24-10 and similarly collected and received, shall be paid from the net revenues derived from said service charges; provided, that nothing herein shall affect the power and duty of the governing body to levy a tax for the payment of a deficiency in the improvement district fund at the times and under the conditions set forth in section 40-26-08. All of the applicable provisions of this title relating to special assessments shall be applicable to such improvements except as to the portion of the cost thereof resolved or ordained to be paid by service charges. The governing body of the municipality shall provide for the establishment, imposition, and collection of service charges for the services furnished by such improvement and the utility or parking system of which it forms a part, and in connection therewith it shall have all the rights and powers respecting such service charges as it would have with respect to like matters if such improvement were made in accordance with chapter 40-35. The net revenues derived from the imposition and collection of such service charges, or such portion thereof as shall be determined by the governing body in said resolutions and ordinances, shall be paid into the appropriate improvement district funds created pursuant to section 40-24-18. Such revenues when collected shall be used and applied in the same manner as moneys paid into such funds from the collection of special assessments. In its resolutions and ordinances, the governing body of any municipality issuing warrants to finance any such improvement may establish an assessment reserve in the fund of the improvement district, to which it may appropriate net revenues of the utility or system from time to time received in excess of amounts required, with special assessments and taxes then on hand, to meet the principal and interest next due on such warrants. Prior to November first of any year, the governing body may by resolution determine the proportion which the amount then on hand in said assessment reserve, and irrevocably appropriated to the payment of said warrant, bears to the aggregate amount of the installment of the special assessments and taxes levied for the improvement which is payable in the following year, including interest thereon, and the governing body may direct the county auditor to reduce, by not more than a proportionate amount, the total of such installment and interest which would otherwise be placed upon the tax list of the municipality for the current year, against each lot and tract of land assessed or taxed for the improvement. If such installment of the special assessment on any property has been prepaid, the governing body may direct the city auditor to refund, out of the assessment reserve, to the owner of the property at the time of such refund as indicated in the records of the recorder of the county, a sum not exceeding a similar proportion of the principal amount of such installment, excluding interest.
Source:
S.L. 1941, ch. 202, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2216; S.L. 1951, ch. 266, § 1; 1957, ch. 281, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2216; S.L. 1985, ch. 458, § 2; 2001, ch. 120, § 1.
Collateral References.
Validity and construction of regulation by municipal corporation fixing sewer-use rates, 61 A.L.R.3d 1236.
40-22-17. Protest against resolution of necessity — Meeting to hear protest.
If, within thirty days after the first publication of the resolution declaring the necessity of an improvement project of the type specified in any one of the subsections of section 40-22-01, the owners of any property within the improvement district file written protests describing the property which is the subject of the protest with the city auditor protesting against the adoption of said resolution, the governing body of the municipality, at its next meeting after the expiration of the time for filing such protests, shall hear and determine the sufficiency thereof.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 143; R.C. 1905, § 2778; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3704; S.L. 1925, ch. 212, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3704; S.L. 1927, ch. 182, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2217; S.L. 1959, ch. 306, § 4; 1967, ch. 323, § 143; 1983, ch. 459, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Effect of Failure to Protest.
Where property owners failed to file written protests to action of city board of commissioners in creating an improvement district, they were bound thereby and the board’s action creating such district was conclusive. Reed v. Langdon, 78 N.D. 991, 54 N.W.2d 148, 1952 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1952).
When plaintiff companies failed to protest the creation of a special improvement district, they were unable to challenge the failure to include other nearby properties in the district; the companies’ action was properly dismissed against the city after the city’s assessment of funds against the companies for a street improvement project. Crane Johnson Lumber Co. v. City of Fargo, 2003 ND 181, 671 N.W.2d 814, 2003 N.D. LEXIS 201 (N.D. 2003).
Strict Construction.
The statutes authorizing improvements to be paid for by special assessments must be strictly pursued, and the resolution of necessity must specifically designate the work to be done. McLauren v. Grand Forks, 43 N.W. 710, 6 Dakota 397, 1889 Dakota LEXIS 27 (Dakota 1889).
When Statute Applies.
The provisions of this statute apply only in a case where a street improvement is to be paid for by special assessment. City of Lidgerwood v. Michalek, 12 N.D. 348, 97 N.W. 541, 1903 N.D. LEXIS 50 (N.D. 1903).
This statute was not applicable to order by city council to construct curbing under Laws 1917, ch. 72 (N.D.C.C. §§ 40-31-01 to 40-31-06). Deuchscher v. Jamestown, 61 N.D. 314, 237 N.W. 814, 1931 N.D. LEXIS 277 (N.D. 1931).
It was error to conclude N.D.C.C. § 40-22-15 gave a property owner no right to protest a city's creation of an improvement district because (1) the district included street repairs, utilities and other items not included in the description of a water or sewer improvement under N.D.C.C. § 40-22-01(1), and (2) it was unknown if the other repairs were incidental to water and sewer repairs, so it could not be concluded with certainty that the property owner's complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Nandan, LLP v. City of Fargo, 2015 ND 37, 858 N.W.2d 892, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 42 (N.D. 2015).
Withdrawal of Protest.
Since property owners have the right to protest the establishment of an improvement district, they also have the right to withdraw from the protest petitions if withdrawal comes before final action is taken thereon. Gallaher v. Fargo, 64 N.W.2d 444, 1954 N.D. LEXIS 77 (N.D. 1954).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 297, 298.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 205 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 983, 984, 989.
Cotenancy as factor in determining representation of property owners in remonstrance against public improvements, 3 A.L.R.2d 127.
Withdrawal of name from remonstrance or revocation of withdrawal, and time therefor, 27 A.L.R.2d 604.
40-22-18. Protest bar to proceeding — Invalid or insufficient protests — Payment of costs — Tax levy.
If the governing body finds the protests to contain the names of the owners of a majority of the area of the property included within the improvement district, the protests shall be a bar against proceeding with any special assessment for the improvement project. However, the protests do not bar proceeding with the improvement project described in the plans and specifications if the governing body funds the project with funds other than special assessments. If the governing body finds the protests to contain the names of the owners of a majority of any separate property area included within the district, the protests shall be a bar against proceeding with special assessments to be assessed in whole or in part upon property within the area, but shall not bar against proceeding with the improvement project or assessing the cost thereof against other areas within the district, unless the protests represent a majority of the area of the entire district. If the protests represent a majority of the area of the entire district, the protests bar any special assessment for the improvement project. Property owned by a political subdivision is not included when determining whether the protests contain the names of the owners of a majority of the area included within the improvement district or a separate property area unless the political subdivision filed a protest.
The termination of proceedings, by reason of protest or otherwise, shall not relieve the municipality of responsibility for payment of costs theretofore incurred and for payment of the costs a municipality may, if funds on hand and available for the purpose are insufficient, issue its certificates of indebtedness or warrants, or levy a tax which shall be considered a tax for a portion of the cost of a special improvement project by general taxation within the meaning of section 57-15-10. If the protests are found to be insufficient or invalid, the governing body may cause the improvement to be made and may contract or otherwise provide in accordance with this title for the construction thereof and the acquisition of property required in connection therewith and may levy and collect assessments therefor.
Source:
S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 2; R.C. 1899, § 2326v; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 143; R.C. 1905, § 2778; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3704; S.L. 1925, ch. 212, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3704; S.L. 1927, ch. 182, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2218; S.L. 1959, ch. 306, § 5; 1971, ch. 402, § 5; 2015, ch. 280, § 1, eff August 1, 2015; 2019, ch. 338, § 1, eff August 1, 2019.
Effective Date.
The 2015 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 280, S.L. 2015 is effective August 1, 2015.
Note.
Section 3 of chapter 280, S.L. 2013 provides: “EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act is effective for special assessment improvement projects initiated after July 31, 2015.”
Notes to Decisions
- Constitutionality.
- Application.
- Burden of Proof.
- Majority of Property.
- Owners.
- Separate Property Area.
- Street Improvements.
Constitutionality.
Protesters against parking lot improvement district failed to establish that this section violated the one-man, one-vote principle enunciated by the United States supreme court because number of property owners protesting was fewer than a majority of owners and the protestants represented less than half of the area within district. Fisher v. Minot, 188 N.W.2d 745, 1971 N.D. LEXIS 193 (N.D. 1971).
Application.
The provisions of this statute apply only in a case where the improvement is to be paid for by special assessment. City of Lidgerwood v. Michalek, 12 N.D. 348, 97 N.W. 541, 1903 N.D. LEXIS 50 (N.D. 1903).
Burden of Proof.
The burden of proof that a sufficient protest was filed is placed upon the taxpayer challenging the action of the city’s governing body. Jones v. Hankinson, 48 N.D. 618, 186 N.W. 276, 1921 N.D. LEXIS 137 (N.D. 1921).
Majority of Property.
A majority of the property liable to be specially assessed meant a majority of the area of such property. Gallaher v. Fargo, 64 N.W.2d 444, 1954 N.D. LEXIS 77 (N.D. 1954) (Decided prior to the 1959 amendment which specified a majority of the area).
Owners.
Protesting holders of leasehold interests were not owners within this section, notwithstanding that lease holders directly paid the cost of special assessments. City of Fargo v. Fahrlander, 199 N.W.2d 30, 1972 N.D. LEXIS 155 (N.D. 1972).
Separate Property Area.
The term “separate property area” as used in this section and N.D.C.C. § 40-22-09 means “a geographically separate or noncontiguous area”. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Street Improvements.
A special-assessment (street-improvement) district which included only property lying within a single, continuous, closed boundary, with streets and avenues that formed a contiguous and interconnecting network, was one single area and written protests by less than a majority of the property owners did not meet the requirements of this section and would not bar improvements. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
40-22-19. Contract proposals.
Proposals for the work of making improvements provided for in this chapter must be advertised for by the governing body in the official newspaper of the municipality once each week for two consecutive weeks. All other provisions for proposals under this chapter are governed by chapter 48-01.2.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 3; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2317; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 3; 1899, ch. 41, § 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2317, 2326d; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, §§ 143, 145; R.C. 1905, §§ 2778, 2780; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, §§ 3, 5; C.L. 1913, §§ 3704, 3705; S.L. 1925, ch. 212, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3704; S.L. 1927, ch. 182, § 1; 1927, ch. 186, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2219; S.L. 1949, ch. 268, § 3; 1957 Supp., § 40-2219; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 144; 1971, ch. 402, § 6; 1995, ch. 443, § 6; 2007, ch. 403, § 5.
Effective Date.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 5 of chapter 403, S.L. 2007 became effective August 1, 2007.
Notes to Decisions
Competitive Bids.
In the absence of charter or statutory requirements to the contrary, a municipal contract need not be let upon competitive bids. Price v. Fargo, 24 N.D. 440, 139 N.W. 1054, 1913 N.D. LEXIS 13 (N.D. 1913).
Defect in Advertising.
Failure of an advertisement for bids to require cash basis and statement of interest rate may be cured by bids on cash basis and stating interest rate, but not if other bids are prevented by such failure. McKenzie v. Mandan, 27 N.D. 546, 147 N.W. 808, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 86 (N.D. 1914).
Interest Rate.
Where payment by warrant is contemplated, statement of interest rate is mandatory. McKenzie v. Mandan, 27 N.D. 546, 147 N.W. 808, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 86 (N.D. 1914).
Time of Publication.
The statute does not require the publication of proposals for work to be delayed until the publication of the resolution of necessity has been completed. Will v. Bismarck, 36 N.D. 570, 163 N.W. 550, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 213 (N.D. 1917).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 330-336.
64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Works and Contracts, §§ 52-61.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1027-1054.
Difference in character or quality of materials, articles or work as affecting acceptance of bid for public contract, 27 A.L.R.2d 917.
Determination of amount involved in contract within statutory provision requiring public contracts involving sums exceeding specified amount to be let to lowest bidder, 53 A.L.R.2d 498.
Right of municipal corporation to recover back from contractor payments made under contract violating competitive bidding statute, 33 A.L.R.3d 397.
Liability of municipality on quasi contract for value of property or work furnished without compliance with bidding requirements, 33 A.L.R.3d 1164.
Public contracts: duty of public authority to disclose to contractor information, allegedly in its possession, affecting cost or feasibility of project, 86 A.L.R.3d 182.
Right of bidder for state or municipal contract to rescind bid on ground that bid was based upon his own mistake or that of his employee, 2 A.L.R.4th 991.
Public contracts: authority of state or its subdivision to reject all bids, 52 A.L.R.4th 186.
40-22-20. Bid to be accompanied by a bond — Bond retained upon failure of bidder to contract — Amount of bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-21. Bidder’s bond — Required — Amount. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1971, ch. 403, § 2.
40-22-22. Execution of bidder’s bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-23. Conditions of bidder’s bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-24. Bids — Filing — Sealing — Endorsing — Opening — Considering. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-25. Opening of bids — Bids to be entered on minutes — Final action on bids to be deferred. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-26. Petition by property owners to have paving of certain material — Contents.
If the governing body has called for bids on more than one kind of pavement, after the opening of the bids in connection with an improvement consisting of paving or repaving and before the meeting of the governing body to consider the same, the owners of a majority of the property liable to be specially assessed for such paving or repaving may file a written petition with the city auditor indicating that the petitioners have a preference for a certain type of paving or paving material for which bids have been invited. Upon receiving such petition, it shall be obligatory upon the governing body to cause the paving or repaving to be constructed of a kind of paving material indicated in the petition. The petition may consist of a single petition or several separate petitions signed by the owners of a majority of the property liable to be specially assessed for such improvement or by their authorized agents.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 143; R.C. 1905, § 2778; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 3; C.L. 1913, § 3704; S.L. 1925, ch. 212, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3704; S.L. 1927, ch. 182, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2226; S.L. 1949, ch. 268, § 5; 1957 Supp., § 40-2226; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 147.
Notes to Decisions
When Statute Applies.
The provisions of this statute apply only in a case where an improvement is to be paid for by special assessment. City of Lidgerwood v. Michalek, 12 N.D. 348, 97 N.W. 541, 1903 N.D. LEXIS 50 (N.D. 1903).
40-22-27. Rejection of bids — Readvertising for bids or construction by municipality without contract — Reevaluation of project. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-28. Determination of kind of paving after bids are considered.
If the contemplated improvement consists of paving or repaving, the governing body, after it has opened and considered the bids, shall determine by resolution the kind or kinds of pavement to be laid, and thereafter may proceed to award the necessary contract or contracts.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 4; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2318; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2318, 2326d; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 148; R.C. 1905, § 2783; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 7; 1913, ch. 70, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3708; R.C. 1943, § 40-2228.
40-22-29. Engineer’s statement of estimated cost required — Governing body to enter into contracts.
Before adopting or rejecting any bid filed under the provisions of this chapter, the governing body shall require the engineer for the municipality to make a careful and detailed statement of the estimated cost of the work for which proposals were advertised under section 40-22-19. The governing body may not award the contract to any bidder if the engineer’s estimate prepared pursuant to this section exceeds the engineer’s estimate of the cost of the work prepared pursuant to subsection 1 of section 40-22-10 by forty percent or more.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 4; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2318; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2318, 2326d; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 148; R.C. 1905, § 2783; S.L. 1907, ch. 46, § 7; 1913, ch. 70, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3708; R.C. 1943, § 40-2229; S.L. 1985, ch. 459, § 1; 1995, ch. 443, § 7; 2003, ch. 345, § 2.
Notes to Decisions
Compliance.
Plain language evidenced a legislative intent that the engineer’s report and resolution of necessity contained an estimate of the cost of the project and that the final cost and amount to be assessed could exceed the amounts listed in the resolution of necessity and engineer’s report; the landowner did not claim the city failed to comply with N.D.C.C. §§ 40-22-29 or 40-23-24, and the total amount of the special assessments did not improperly exceed the amounts estimated in the resolution of necessity and engineer’s report. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
40-22-30. Contractor’s bond — Execution. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-31. Conditions of contractor’s bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-32. Approval of bonds — Return of bidder’s bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-33. Failure to execute contractor’s bond. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-34. Insufficiency of bonds — New bonds required — Failure to furnish. [Repealed]
Repealed by S.L. 1995, ch. 443, § 29.
40-22-35. Execution and filing of contract.
All contracts entered into for any work provided for in this chapter shall be entered into in the name of the municipality and shall be executed on the part of the municipality by the executive officer and countersigned by the auditor. After the contract is signed by the contractor, it shall be filed in the office of the city auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 4; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2318; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2318, 2326d; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 149; R.C. 1905, § 2784; C.L. 1913, § 3709; R.C. 1943, § 40-2235; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 150; 1973, ch. 80, § 15.
Collateral References.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, § 1049.
Revocation, prior to execution of formal written contract, of vote or decision of public body awarding contract to bidder, 3 A.L.R.3d 864.
40-22-36. Contracts — Conditions and terms.
A contract let under the provisions of this chapter shall require the work to be done pursuant to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the city auditor, subject to the approval of the engineer acting for the municipality, and shall provide further:
- That the governing body shall have the right to suspend the work at any time for improper construction and to relet the contract therefor or to order a reconstruction of the work as to any part thereof improperly done.
- The time within which the work shall be completed.
- The period of time for which the work shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and materials.
- The fund from which the contract price is to be paid by the municipality.
- That the consideration expressed in the contract is payable only in warrants drawn on the fund described in the contract.
- That the municipality assumes and incurs no general liability under such contract.
- That failure of the engineer to reject work and materials which are not up to specifications and acceptance of the job by the engineer shall not release the contractor from liability for any failure on the contractor’s part to perform work or furnish materials in accordance with the plans and specifications.
The engineer acting for the municipality shall supervise and inspect the work during its progress. In addition to any rights which a municipality may have under its contract for construction of part or all of an improvement after a contract has been awarded and before work thereunder has been completed a municipality may, with the consent of the contractor and without advertising for bids, order additional work done by that contractor of the same character as that which was contracted for, whether within or without the improvement district for which the original contract was made, and upon the same terms and conditions specified in the original contract except as to time of performance, and at the same prices for the additional work provided that the total price payable to the contractor for such additional work shall not exceed twenty percent of the amount estimated by the engineer for the municipality to be payable for that character of work under the original contract.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 4; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2318; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 4; R.C. 1899, §§ 2318, 2326d; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 149; R.C. 1905, § 2784; C.L. 1913, § 3709; R.C. 1943, § 40-2236; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 151; 1971, ch. 402, § 7.
Notes to Decisions
Assuming General Liability.
This statute prohibits a municipality from assuming or incurring a general liability upon an implied contract as well as an express contract for improvements made pursuant to the provisions of N.D.C.C. ch. 40-22. Megarry Bros. v. City of St. Thomas, 66 N.W.2d 704 (N.D. 1954).
Certificate of Engineer.
The certificate of the city engineer that work has been completed is essential before the city can levy assessments against individual property for the payment of the cost of the improvement. Baker v. Lamoure, 21 N.D. 140, 129 N.W. 464, 1910 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1910).
Where contract for municipal improvements specifically provided that the project engineer would supervise the work and would see that such work was done according to the contract provisions, the certificate of the engineer approving the work and the manner of performance and the action of the city in accepting such certificate of approval were conclusive on the parties in the absence of fraud, collusion, or such gross mistake as would imply bad faith on the part of the engineer. Granville v. Kovash, Inc., 118 N.W.2d 354, 1962 N.D. LEXIS 101, 1962 N.D. LEXIS 102 (N.D. 1962).
Collateral References.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1044-1048.
Waiver of, or estoppel to rely upon, contractual limitation of time for bringing action against a municipality or other political subdivision, 81 A.L.R.2d 1039.
40-22-37. Contractor shall be paid during progress of work — Retainage — Failure to pay — Rate of interest — Investment of retainage.
If the contractor to whom a contract is let properly performs the work therein designated, the governing body, at least once in each calendar month during the continuance of such contract work, shall meet, receive, and consider estimates furnished by the agent, engineer, or architect acting for the municipality or if not so furnished, then by the contractor, and shall allow such estimates in an amount of the estimated value of the labor and material furnished upon such contract, and of the material then upon the ground for use in such contract, subject to retentions equal to ten percent of each estimate presented until such time as the project is fifty percent completed, with no further retainage on estimates during the continuance of the contract. The governing body may, however, upon completion of ninety-five percent of the contract according to the estimates, pay to the contractor ninety-five percent of the amount retained from previous estimates. Any amount retained after ninety-five percent completion of the contract shall be paid to the contractor in such amounts and at such times as are approved by the municipality, upon estimates by its agent, engineer, or architect or the contractor, with final payment of all moneys due to the contractor to be made immediately following completion and acceptance of the project. The governing body, immediately after considering and allowing any such estimate, shall certify and forward the same to the city auditor or other official having the power to draw warrants, who forthwith shall draw a warrant upon the proper fund and transmit the same promptly to the contractor entitled thereto. In case the governing body shall fail or neglect to receive and allow such estimate or certify any estimate or final payment upon completion and acceptance or the proper officer required to issue such warrant shall fail or neglect to issue a warrant as provided herein, for a period of more than thirty days from the date of such estimate or completion date, then said estimate or final payment, together with any retainage properly payable, shall draw interest from its date at the rate per annum of two percentage points below the Bank of North Dakota prime interest rate as set thirty days from the date of such estimate or completion date until the issuance of a proper warrant therefor. Such interest shall be computed and added to the face of said estimate, final payment, or retainage by the officer required to issue such warrant, shall be included in the warrant when drawn, and shall be charged to the fund from which payment for the improvement is to be made. On the amounts of estimates retained, as provided herein, the governing board, authorized committee, or public body in charge of such work may invest or deposit the retained amounts in any financial association or institution in North Dakota earning interest or dividends for the benefit of the contractor. Any amounts so invested or deposited shall remain in the name of the governing board, authorized committee, or public body in charge of such work until final payment of all money due to the contractor is to be made. Further, no contractor shall use such account in any manner whatsoever until released and received by the contractor upon completion of the contract.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 5; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2319; S.L. 1899, ch. 41, § 5; R.C. 1899, §§ 2319, 2326e; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 150; R.C. 1905, § 2785; C.L. 1913, § 3710; R.C. 1943, § 40-2237; S.L. 1963, ch. 295, § 1; 1971, ch. 405, § 1; 1975, ch. 376, § 1; 1981, ch. 467, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Defenses Against Transferee of Warrants.
A transferee of the improvement warrants of a municipal corporation, after approval by city council, is not subject to defenses subsequently arising. Dakota Trust Co. v. Hankinson, 53 N.D. 356, 205 N.W. 990, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 86 (N.D. 1925).
Partial Awards.
Partial awards during the progress of work are limited to eighty-five percent of the amount of the estimates shown to have been earned. State ex rel. Kistler v. Hankinson, 53 N.D. 346, 205 N.W. 995, 1925 N.D. LEXIS 87 (N.D. 1925). (Decided prior to 1963 amendment which changed percentages).
Collateral References.
65 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Works and Contracts, § 143.
40-22-38. Application of chapter to waterworks and water mains — Acquisition of waterworks, sewage treatment and disposal plants, and sewer systems.
The provisions of this chapter relating to water mains and waterworks apply only to municipalities that own or contemplate owning a system of waterworks and water mains. In case of the purchase of a waterworks system or of a sewage treatment or disposal plant or of a system of sewers, either by eminent domain proceedings subject to chapter 32-15, or otherwise, a municipality may create improvement districts, direct the preparation of plans and specifications, adopt a resolution declaring the purchase of such facilities necessary, and take all other proceedings prescribed by this chapter which would be taken in case of the construction of such facilities by the municipality itself for the purpose of defraying the cost thereof by special assessment of the property benefited thereby. The property benefited may be specially assessed for the purchase of such facilities, either separately or as a part of a new system, the same as if said facilities were constructed entirely anew.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 179; R.C. 1905, § 2817; C.L. 1913, § 3742; S.L. 1921, ch. 36, § 1; 1925 Supp., § 3742; R.C. 1943, § 40-2238; S.L. 1951, ch. 267, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2238; 2007, ch. 293, § 21.
Effective Date.
The 2007 amendment of this section by section 21 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007 became effective April 5, 2007, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 47 of chapter 293, S.L. 2007.
Cross-References.
Community water facility loans, see ch. 6-09.5.
40-22-39. Abbreviations, letters, or figures may be used in proceedings for levy and collection of special assessments.
In all proceedings for the levy and collection of special assessments, abbreviations, letters, and figures may be used to denote additions, lots, lands, blocks, sections, townships, ranges, and parts thereof, years, days of the month, and amounts of money.
Source:
S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 16; 1899, ch. 41, § 17; R.C. 1899, §§ 2326q, 2327i; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 176; R.C. 1905, § 2814; C.L. 1913, § 3739; R.C. 1943, § 40-2239.
40-22-40. City auditor to keep complete record of improvements — Record as evidence.
The city auditor shall keep in the city auditor’s office a complete record of all the proceedings taken in the matter of making any improvements under this chapter. Such record shall include all reports and the confirmations thereof, all petitions, orders, appointments of commissioners, notices and proofs of publications, and resolutions of the governing body. Such record, a certified transcript thereof, or the original papers, proofs of publications, orders, or resolutions on file in such office shall be admitted in evidence in any court or place in this state without further proof as evidence of the facts therein contained.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 175; R.C. 1905, § 2813; C.L. 1913, § 3738; R.C. 1943, § 40-2240; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 152.
40-22-41. Validation. [Repealed]
Repealed by omission from this code.
40-22-42. Confirmation of certain proceedings for city and village improvements. [Repealed]
Repealed by omission from this code.
40-22-43. Defects and irregularities in improvement proceedings are not fatal.
Defects and irregularities in any proceedings had or to be had under this chapter relating to municipal improvements by the special assessment method, when the proceedings are for a lawful purpose and are unaffected by fraud and do not violate any constitutional limitation or restriction, shall not invalidate such proceedings, and no action shall be commenced or maintained and no defense or counterclaim in any action shall be recognized in the courts of this state founded on any such defects or irregularities in such proceedings, unless commenced within thirty days of the adoption of the resolution of the governing board awarding the sale of warrants to finance the improvement.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 305, § 1; 1977, ch. 216, § 2.
Notes to Decisions
Action Untimely.
City’s inadvertent failure to include a complete map of proposed street improvement project when publishing its second notice of resolution of necessity did not violate property owner’s due process rights and the action by landowners to invalidate the assessments which was filed more than thirty days after the City’s adoption of the resolution was barred by the statute of limitations. Serenko v. City of Wilton, 1999 ND 88, 593 N.W.2d 368, 1999 N.D. LEXIS 122 (N.D. 1999).
40-22-44. Discontinuance of municipal parking lots.
The governing body of a municipality may, if it deems it in the best interests of the municipality, discontinue the operation of a municipal parking lot when there exists a higher and better use for the property. If any portion of the cost of such parking lot has been paid for by special assessment, the governing body shall, prior to making any determination to discontinue, hold a public hearing concerning the continuance or discontinuance of such parking lot. The governing body shall cause to be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality a notice of the time when and the place where the governing body will meet to conduct the hearing required by this section. If the governing body, after public hearing, determines that the parking lot may be put to a higher and better use, the governing body is hereby authorized to take the necessary steps to effectuate that use. For this purpose, the governing body is authorized to, but not limited to, enter into and complete negotiations for the sale of the parking lot in question.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 331, § 1.
40-22-45. Equalization of original assessment.
Whenever any portion of the cost of a parking lot which is to be discontinued has been paid for by special assessment, the useful life of the parking lot shall be determined by the governing body. If the period of time determined to be the useful life of the parking lot has not completely elapsed, the governing body of the municipality shall direct the cancellation of uncollected installments of special assessments previously levied for the same improvement, and the refund of installments paid, plus interest calculated at four and one-half percent per annum on the refunded prepaid installments, from the general fund of the municipality to the extent determined by it to be necessary to make the original assessments and the subsequent assessments bear as nearly as possible the same relation to the total benefits derived from the improvement by the respective properties assessed.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 331, § 2.
40-22-46. Payment of outstanding warrants — Deposits of surplus in general fund — General fund liable for any outstanding warrants.
Upon the discontinuance of any municipal parking lot under the authority of sections 40-22-44 and 40-22-45, the governing body shall apply the proceeds from the sale of such property, if such property is sold, to the special assessment fund created to bear the cost of creating the parking lot. If there is any surplus after all of the outstanding special assessment warrants or bonds are redeemed, the surplus shall be transferred to the general fund of the municipality. If the proceeds from the sale of such property, if such property is sold, are insufficient to cover the cost of redeeming the outstanding special assessment warrants or bonds, the governing body shall provide for the payment of said warrants or bonds out of the general fund of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 331, § 3.
CHAPTER 40-22.1 Special Assessments for Promotion of Business Activity
40-22.1-01. Improvements by special assessments for business promotion.
A municipality may defray the expense of improvements by special assessments for the promotion of business activity and new business development through any means not inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter, including advertising, public information, marketing, maintenance and decoration of public places, promotion of public events, furnishing of music in any public place, providing professional management, planning, and promotion, and the general promotion of trade activities. The governing body of the municipality may make and execute necessary or convenient agreements to exercise the powers and functions under this chapter, including contracts with any entity. In planning an improvement project under this chapter the governing body may include any work and materials which are deemed necessary or reasonably incidental to the project. A municipality may not issue warrants, bonds, or any other form of indebtedness in anticipation of the levy and collection of assessments under this chapter.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1; 2011, ch. 296, § 1.
Effective Date.
The 2011 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 296, S.L. 2011 became effective August 1, 2011.
40-22.1-02. Improvement districts to be created.
For an improvement project under section 40-22.1-01 and defraying the costs of the project by special assessments, a municipality may create and alter a business improvement district by ordinance or resolution. The governing body of the municipality shall designate the district by an appropriate name and by a number distinguishing it from other improvement districts. A municipality may make and finance any improvement and levy special assessments for the improvement under any alternate procedure in this title. If the proposal for creation of an improvement project under this chapter is made by any person, group, or entity that is not an officer, board, or agency of the municipality, the person, group, or entity shall file a bond or other sufficient security, payable to the municipality, to defray all costs incurred if the improvement project is later barred under section 40-22.1-08. The bond or other sufficient security must be filed with the city auditor prior to the initiation of any further proceedings under this chapter. The governing body of the municipality shall determine the amount and form of the bond or other sufficient security.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-03. Size and form of improvement district — Regulations governing.
Any business improvement district created by a municipality may embrace two or more separate property areas. A business improvement district must include all properties which in the judgment of the governing body, after consultation with the city auditor or city auditor’s designee planning the improvement, will be benefited by the creation of all or a portion of the business improvement project. A district may be created without uniformity among the types, items, or quantities of work and materials to be used at particular locations throughout the district. The jurisdiction of a municipality to make, finance, and assess the cost of any improvement project may not be impaired by any lack of commonness, unity, or singleness of the location, purpose, or character of the improvement, or by the fact that any one or more of the properties included in the district is subsequently determined not to be benefited by the improvement, or by a particular portion of the improvement. Upon receipt of a petition signed by the owners of three-fourths of the area to be added to a business improvement district in which an improvement is proposed or created, the governing body may enlarge the district. Any district created under this chapter shall include only property devoted, in whole or in part, to commercial or business use.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-04. Auditor’s report required — Contents.
After a business improvement district has been created, the governing body of a municipality, to make any of the improvements set out in section 40-22.1-01 in the manner provided in this chapter, shall direct the city auditor for the municipality or some other person, group, or entity to prepare a report as to the general nature, purpose, and feasibility of the proposed improvement and an estimate of the probable cost of the work.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-05. Approval of plans, specifications, and estimates.
At any time after receiving the report required by section 40-22.1-04, the governing body may direct the city auditor or other person, group, or other entity preparing the report to prepare detailed plans and specifications concerning the improvement. The plans and specifications must be approved by a resolution of the governing body of the municipality. The plans, specifications, and estimates are the property of the municipality and must be filed in the office of the city auditor and shall remain on file in that office subject to inspection by the public.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-06. Resolution declaring improvements necessary — Contents of resolution — Publication of resolution.
After the report required by section 40-22.1-04 has been filed and approved, the governing body of the municipality shall declare by resolution that it is necessary to make the improvements. A resolution is not required if the governing body determines by resolution that a written petition for the improvement, signed by the owners of a majority of the area of the property included within a district, has been received. The resolution must refer intelligibly to the report and must include a map of the municipality showing the proposed business improvement district. The resolution must be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-07. Protest against resolution of necessity — Meeting to hear protest.
If, within thirty days after the first publication of the resolution declaring the necessity of a business improvement project, the owners of any property within the improvement district file written protest with the city auditor against the adoption of the resolution and describing the property which is the subject of the protest, the governing body of the municipality, at its next meeting after the expiration of the time for filing protests, shall hear and determine the sufficiency of the protests.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-08. Protest bar to proceeding — Invalid or insufficient protest — Payment of costs — Tax levy.
If the governing body finds the protest to contain the names of the owners of one-third or more of the area of the property included within the business improvement district, the protest bars proceeding further with the improvement project described in the plans and specifications. If the governing body finds the protest to contain the names of the owners of one-third or more of any separate property area included within the district, the protest bars proceeding with the applicable portion of the improvement project, but does not bar proceeding with the remainder of the improvement project or assessing the cost of the improvement project against other areas within the district, unless the protest represents one-third or more of the area of the entire district. Termination of proceedings does not relieve the municipality of responsibility for payment of costs incurred. The municipality is not responsible for payment of costs incurred if the improvement project is proposed by any person, group, or entity that is not an officer, board, or agency of the municipality. Payment of the costs incurred for such a barred improvement project must be as provided in section 40-22.1-02. For payment of costs incurred for a barred improvement project proposed by a municipality, the municipality may, if available funds are insufficient, issue its certificates of indebtedness or warrants, or levy a tax which shall be considered a tax for a portion of the costs of a special improvement project by general taxation within the meaning of section 57-15-10. If the protests are found to be insufficient or invalid, the governing body may cause the improvement to be made, levy and collect necessary assessments, and contract for the improvement and acquisition of necessary property or services.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-09. Execution and filing of contracts.
All contracts under this chapter must be entered into in the name of the municipality and must be executed for the municipality by the executive officer and countersigned by the auditor. After the contract is signed by the other party, it must be filed in the office of the city auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-10. Contracts — Conditions and terms.
A contract executed under this chapter must require the work to be done pursuant to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the city auditor, subject to the approval of the city auditor acting for the municipality, and must provide:
- The governing body may suspend the work at any time for improper performance and relet the contract or order reperformance of all or any of the work improperly done.
- The time within which the work is to be completed.
- The period of time for which the work must be guaranteed or warranted.
- The fund from which the contract price is to be paid by the municipality.
- That the consideration expressed in the contract is payable only in warrants drawn on the fund described in the contract.
- That the municipality assumes and incurs no general liability under the contract.
- That the failure of the city auditor to reject work and materials which are not up to specifications and acceptance of the job by the city auditor does not release the party from liability for any failure to perform work or furnish materials in accordance with the plans and specifications.
The city auditor acting for the municipality shall supervise and inspect the work during its progress. In addition to any rights which a municipality may have under its contract for establishment and operation of part or all of a business improvement after a contract has been awarded and before contract work has been completed, a municipality may, with the consent of the other party and without advertising for bids, order additional work done by that party of the same character as that which was contracted for, whether within or without the improvement district for which the original contract was made, and upon the same terms and conditions specified in the original contract except as to time of performance, and at the same prices for the additional work; provided, that the total price payable to said party for such additional work may not exceed twenty percent of the amount estimated by the city auditor for the municipality to be payable for that character of work under the original contract.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-11. Abbreviations, letters, and figures may be used in proceedings for levy and collection of special assessments.
In all proceedings for the levy and collection of special assessments abbreviations, letters, and figures may be used to denote full or partial additions, lots, blocks, sections, townships, and ranges or years, days of the month, and amounts of money.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-12. City auditor to keep complete record of improvements — Record as evidence.
The city auditor shall keep a complete record of all the proceedings in the matter of making any improvements under this chapter. The records must include all reports and confirmations, all petitions, orders, appointments of commissioners, notices and proofs of publication, and resolutions of the governing body. The records, a certified transcript of the records, or the original papers, proofs, publications, orders, or resolutions on file in the auditor’s office may be admitted in evidence in any court or place in this state without further proof as evidence of the facts they contain.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-13. Defects and irregularities in improvement proceedings are not fatal.
If the proceedings are for a lawful purpose, unaffected by fraud, and do not violate any constitutional limitation or restriction, defects or irregularities in proceedings under this chapter do not invalidate the proceedings. No action may be commenced or maintained and no defense or counterclaim in any action may be recognized in the courts of this state founded on any defects or irregularities in proceedings under this chapter, unless commenced within thirty days of the adoption of the resolution of the governing body awarding the sale of warrants to finance the improvement.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1.
40-22.1-14. City auditor’s statement of estimated cost required — Governing body to enter into contracts.
Before adopting or rejecting any contract proposed under this chapter, the governing body shall require the city auditor for the municipality to make a careful and detailed statement of the estimated cost of the work. The governing body may not award the contract if the city auditor’s estimate prepared under this section exceeds the estimate prepared under section 40-22.1-04. If all proposals are not rejected, the governing body shall award the contract to that person, firm, corporation, limited liability company, or other entity best able to perform the work, upon the basis of cash payment for the work.
Source:
S.L. 1987, ch. 494, § 1; 1993, ch. 54, § 106.
CHAPTER 40-23 Assessment of Benefits
40-23-01. Special assessment commission — Appointment of members — Terms of office.
The executive officer of each municipality, when it shall be found necessary, shall appoint three reputable residents and freeholders of the municipality as members of a commission which shall be known as the special assessment commission. The members appointed to the first special assessment commission in a municipality shall hold office, respectively, for terms designated by the executive officer when the appointments are made, as follows:
- One member shall hold office until the first meeting of the governing body in April in the first odd-numbered year following that member’s appointment.
- One member shall hold office until the first meeting of the governing body in April in the second odd-numbered year following that member’s appointment.
- One member shall hold office until the first meeting of the governing body in April in the third odd-numbered year following that member’s appointment.
At the first meeting of the governing body in April of each odd-numbered year, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the executive officer shall appoint a member of such commission. After the members of the first special assessment commission have been appointed as provided in this section, each appointment shall be made for a term of six years.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 8; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326h, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 164; R.C. 1905, § 2799; C.L. 1913, § 3724; R.C. 1943, § 40-2301.
Cross-References.
Gravel surfacing streets by special assessment, see ch. 40-54.
Residential paving projects, see ch. 40-56.
Notes to Decisions
In General.
A special assessment commission is in essence a legislative tribunal created by legislative authority for the purpose of (1) determining the benefits accruing to the several tracts of land in an improvement district by reason of the construction of an improvement and (2) assessing the costs and expenses thereof against each tract in proportion to the benefit received. Cloverdale Foods Co. v. Mandan, 364 N.W.2d 56, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 260 (N.D. 1985).
Power to Lay Special Assessment.
The foundation of the power to lay a special assessment for a local improvement of any character, including the improvement of a city street, is the benefit which the object of the assessment confers on the owner of the abutting property, or the owners of property in the assessment district, which is different from the general benefit which the owners enjoy in common with other inhabitants or citizens of the municipal corporation. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Right to Appeal.
Even though railroad did not appear or file objection either before or at hearing by special assessment commission, the railroad was not estopped to appeal from determination of commission; the right of appeal is not conditioned upon appearance before the commission. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 453-453(2).
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1240-1242.
Parking facilities, municipal establishment or operation of, 8 A.L.R.2d 373.
Tax sale as freeing property from possibility of further assessments for benefits to land, 11 A.L.R.2d 1133.
Power to remit, release, or compromise assessments for public improvements, 28 A.L.R.2d 1425.
Power of municipality or other governmental unit to make contract or covenant exempting or releasing property from special assessment, 47 A.L.R.2d 1185.
Power to include in special assessment, interest accruing during the construction of the public improvement and running until special assessment therefor becomes due, 58 A.L.R.2d 1343.
40-23-02. Commissioners — Appointments subject to confirmation — Qualifications — Chairman — Compensation.
All appointments made to the special assessment commission shall be subject to the confirmation of the governing body. Upon appointment and confirmation, each commissioner shall file with the city auditor a written acceptance of the appointment and shall take and subscribe the oath required of other municipal officers, which shall be filed with the city auditor. The member of the commission having the shortest term to serve shall act as chairman. No member of the commission shall hold any other municipal office while serving as such member. The appointing authority shall establish the rate of compensation for commissioners and actual expenses incurred by commissioners may be reimbursed at the official reimbursement rates of the appointing authority.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 8; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326h, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 164; R.C. 1905, § 2799; C.L. 1913, § 3724; R.C. 1943, § 40-2302; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 153; 1973, ch. 329, § 1; 2013, ch. 93, § 12.
Effective Date.
The 2013 amendment of this section by section 12 of chapter 93, S.L. 2013 became effective August 1, 2013.
40-23-03. Removal of commissioners — Filling vacancies.
Any member of the commission may be removed by the executive officer, with the consent of a majority of the members of the governing body, for neglect or refusal to perform the duties of the office or for misconduct in office. A vacancy occurring in the commission by removal, resignation, or death shall be filled by appointment by the executive officer as soon as practicable after the vacancy occurs.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 8; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326h, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 164; R.C. 1905, § 2799; C.L. 1913, § 3724; R.C. 1943, § 40-2303.
40-23-04. Municipal officers and employees to advise commission.
Each officer and employee of the municipality shall give to the special assessment commission such information, advice, and assistance as it may request.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 8; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326h, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 164; R.C. 1905, § 2799; C.L. 1913, § 3724; R.C. 1943, § 40-2304.
40-23-05. Notice to special assessment commission.
At any time after the contract and bond for any work for which a special assessment is required have been executed and approved by the governing body of the municipality and the total cost of such work shall have been estimated as nearly as practicable, the governing body may direct assessments to be levied for the payment of all or any part of such cost, and the city auditor shall notify the chairman of the special assessment commission and shall certify to the chairman the items of the total cost thereof so far as the same have been ascertained. The chairman immediately shall call a meeting of the commission, which shall proceed as expeditiously as possible to make and return the special assessment as provided in this chapter. The total cost of the improvement which may be certified to the assessment commission shall include the estimated construction cost under the terms of the contract, a reasonable allowance as determined by the governing body for cost of extra work which may be authorized under the plans and specifications, engineering, fiscal agent’s and attorney’s fees for any services in connection with the authorization and financing of the improvement, cost of publication of required notices and printing of improvement warrants, and all expenses incurred in the making of the improvement and levy of assessments therefor. If any error is made in estimating the cost, the governing body may direct a supplemental assessment to be made as provided in section 40-26-02.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 165; R.C. 1905, § 2800; C.L. 1913, § 3725; S.L. 1939, ch. 172, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2305; S.L. 1949, ch. 269, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2305; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 154.
Notes to Decisions
Construction Interest.
“Construction interest” is a proper part of the expense of improvement within the terms of the statute. It is that sum estimated for the payment of interest on special assessment warrants sold to defray the cost of an improvement from the time of sale until special assessments become due and payable and begin to draw interest. Hoffman v. Minot, 77 N.W.2d 850, 1956 N.D. LEXIS 132 (N.D. 1956).
Expenses.
N.D.C.C. § 40-23-05 permitted the city to assess all of its expenses incurred in making the improvements and assessments; the city did not fail to correctly interpret the law, nor did it abuse its discretion by including these amounts in the total cost of the project. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Power of Commission.
Pursuant to the express provisions of this section and N.D.C.C. §§ 40-23-07 and 40-23-15, the special-assessment commission is vested with the power and the authority to fix and determine not only the benefits, but the amount of the assessment each property owner should be required to pay, subject to the statutory review by the governing body provided for by N.D.C.C. § 40-23-15. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Where special assessment commission has been appointed by municipality pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 40-23-01, such commission, under this section, has power to make assessments in accordance with law at any time after contract and bond for work for which special assessment is required has been executed and approved by governing body. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Certificate.
The certificate of the city engineer that an improvement had been completed was essential under R.C. 1905, §§ 2787 and 2800 before the city could levy special assessments against individual property to pay the cost of the improvement. Baker v. Lamoure, 21 N.D. 140, 129 N.W. 464, 1910 N.D. LEXIS 159 (N.D. 1910).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 454-463.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 87 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1246, 1255-1270.
40-23-06. Assessments in improvement districts before work completed.
If the work consists of improvements on or additions to sewers or water mains already installed or paving already laid, and all bids for such work were rejected and the work done by the municipality, and if, in the opinion of the engineer acting for the municipality, the work can be done in separate sections or work units, it shall not be necessary that all of the work be completed before the special assessments are made. The governing body, by resolution adopted at any time before or after the work has been commenced, may specify what part of the improvements shall constitute a separate section or work unit, and upon completion of the work in one or more of such separate sections or work units, the special assessments may be made in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if all of the work in the entire improvement district had been completed. Failure for any reason to complete the work in any remaining separate section or work unit included within such improvement district shall not affect the validity of the special assessments made or the special assessment warrants issued for the work completed.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 165; R.C. 1905, § 2800; C.L. 1913, § 3725; S.L. 1939, ch. 172, § 1; R.C. 1943, § 40-2306.
40-23-07. Determination of special assessments by commission — Political subdivisions not exempt.
Whenever the commission makes any special assessment, the commission shall determine the particular lots and parcels of land which, in the opinion of the commission, will be especially benefited by the construction of the work for which the assessment is to be made. The commission shall determine the amount in which each of the lots and parcels of land will be especially benefited by the construction of the work for which such special assessment is to be made, and shall assess against each of such lots and parcels of land such sum, not exceeding the benefits, as is necessary to pay its just proportion of the total cost of such work, or of the part thereof which is to be paid by special assessment, including all expenses incurred in making such assessment and publishing necessary notices with reference thereto and the per diem of the commission. However, as an alternative to the procedure provided in this section, the special assessment commission may, in its discretion, determine and allocate the cost of special assessments in accordance with the method provided for in chapter 40-23.1. Property owned by a nonprofit entity and used exclusively as a cemetery is exempt from collection of special assessments for benefits conferred under this title and the city in which such property is located shall provide for the payment of special assessments, installments, and interest against such property by the levy of taxes according to law or by payment from other funds available to the city which are derived from sources other than special assessments. Benefited property belonging to counties, cities, school districts, park districts, and townships is not exempt from such assessment, and such public corporations whose property is so assessed shall provide for the payment of such assessments, installments thereof and interest thereon, by the levy of taxes according to law. Nothing in this section may be deemed to amend other provisions of law with reference to the levy of assessments on property sold for delinquent taxes.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, §§ 6, 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, §§ 2, 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2326z, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2801; S.L. 1913, ch. 85, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3726; R.C. 1943, § 40-2307; S.L. 1947, ch. 285, § 1; 1957, ch. 282, § 1; 1957 Supp., § 40-2307; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 155; 1967, ch. 332, § 2; 1999, ch. 366, § 1; 2009, ch. 348, § 1.
Effective Date.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 1 of chapter 348, S.L. 2009 became effective April 29, 2009, pursuant to an emergency clause in section 4 of 348, S.L. 2009.
Note.
Section 2 of ch. 348, S.L. 2009 provides:
“LEGISLATIVE INTENT. It is the intent of the sixty-first legislative assembly by enactment of this Act to provide for payment of special assessments against nonprofit cemetery property, including outstanding unpaid obligations, through levy of general property taxes within the city in recognition of the public benefit provided by operation of nonprofit cemeteries.”
Section 3 of ch. 348, S.L. 2009 provides:
“EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act is effective for collection of special assessments regardless of the date of the assessment.”
Notes to Decisions
- In General.
- Assessment for Flood Improvement.
- Assessment for Improvements to Sewer System.
- Assessment for Paving Streets.
- Assessment for Water Improvement.
- Assessment of City Property.
- Assessment of Railroad Right-of-Way.
- Assessment of Urban Renewal Property.
- Assessment Upon Foot Frontage Basis.
- Assessments Limited to Benefit.
- Assessment upon Foot Frontage Basis.
- Performance of Duties.
- Power of Commission.
- Statutory Requirements to Be Met.
In General.
It is the total work product used, rather than the exact method used, in determining the final assessment that is important. Cloverdale Foods Co. v. Mandan, 364 N.W.2d 56, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 260 (N.D. 1985).
While assessments levied against each lot must be limited to a “just proportion,” the process of quantifying benefits accruing to each lot inevitably rests on the judgment and discretion of the special assessment commission, and there is no precise formula for quantifying benefits. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Special Assessment Commission did not abuse its discretion in choosing the method of assessment, the Special Assessment Commission determined the benefit to each property from the improvements and the method used for determining the special assessments was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Special assessment commission determined that the improvements benefited the owner’s properties in the amount assessed to them under the city’s policy, and the assessments did not exceed the benefits; the city did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably in determining the benefits and assessments to the owner’s properties. Despite the city’s difficulty in explaining the determination of benefits, the assessments satisfied the statute. Holter v. City of Mandan, 2020 ND 152, 946 N.W.2d 524, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 169 (N.D. 2020), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 141 S. Ct. 1515, 209 L. Ed. 2d 254, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 1334 (U.S. 2021).
District court properly dismissed an owner’s appeal of a board of city commissioners’ decision to specially assess her property for street improvements because the assessments to the owner’s properties satisfied the statutory requirements since the city assessed properties benefited by the street improvements on the basis of linear feet, and, while the findings by the special assessment commission on the amount of the benefit might be somewhat conclusory, the amount of the benefit was determined to be less than the total cost and was determined to be a just proportion of the total cost based on the city’s formula. 2020 ND 202, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 203.
Assessment for Flood Improvement.
When a special assessment commission made an assessment against a property for a special flood-improvement district, the commission did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably because, even though the property’s owner could plan to continue farming the property, the property would benefit from the improvement district, and the special benefit received would not be exceeded by the assessment. Bateman v. City of Grand Forks, 2008 ND 72, 747 N.W.2d 117, 2008 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 2008).
Assessment for Improvements to Sewer System.
The commission properly exercised its authority and discretion in choosing to employ a “water use” method of assessment for improvements to the sewer system and the “water use” method was a fair, just, and equitable method of determining benefits, where there was a direct relationship between water use and the size of the improvement facilities. Although it may have been a somewhat novel method of assessing benefits, it appeared undeniable that water use did have a direct relationship to the size and capacity of sewerage facilities needed. Cloverdale Foods Co. v. Mandan, 364 N.W.2d 56, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 260 (N.D. 1985).
Assessment for Paving Streets.
Front-footage method may be used for assessing the costs of paving streets, particularly when the method is modified as necessary to maintain a fair proportion among the properties benefited by the project. Farmers Union Cent. Exch. v. Grand Forks County, 443 N.W.2d 907, 1989 N.D. LEXIS 149 (N.D. 1989).
Assessment for Water Improvement.
Although evidence that the landowners had in fact received the benefits attributed to them was not overwhelming, where the water improvement enhanced fire protection and facilitated moderate commercial and residential growth, the city had received requests to develop some of the landowners’ property, and the old water system retarded city growth, these facts, combined with the presumption that assessments are valid, supported assessments on undeveloped property at approximately 43 percent of the rate of developed property, and the taxing authorities did not act arbitrarily, oppressively or unreasonably. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Assessment of City Property.
The assessment by the city of city property for special assessment improvements is not contrary to the provisions of article X, section 5 of the constitution of the state. Gallaher v. Fargo, 64 N.W.2d 444, 1954 N.D. LEXIS 77 (N.D. 1954).
Assessment of Railroad Right-of-Way.
The right-of-way of a railroad company may be specially assessed for public improvements, including water mains and sanitary sewers, but the benefits must not be speculative nor conjectural. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. v. City of Minot, 51 N.D. 313, 199 N.W. 875, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 180 (N.D. 1924).
Assessment of Urban Renewal Property.
Urban renewal property is subject to the payment of special assessments, it not being specifically exempted therefrom by this section. Southwest Fargo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lenthe, 149 N.W.2d 373, 1967 N.D. LEXIS 139 (N.D. 1967).
Assessment Upon Foot Frontage Basis.
Special Assessment Commission did not use an inappropriate method to calculate the benefits appellants’ property located in the improvement district under N.D.C.C. § 40-23-07 by using a formula based on front footage or square footage, because the Commission was not required to separately determine the benefits to each individual property within the improvement district. D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
Assessments Limited to Benefit.
When special assessments are levied against property especially benefited by a special improvement, the amounts assessed against specific tracts are limited to and may not exceed the benefits from such improvement accruing to such tracts. Gunderson v. Maides, 71 N.D. 561, 3 N.W.2d 236, 1942 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1942).
Assessment upon Foot Frontage Basis.
The foot frontage method of apportioning assessments can be used only in cases where the benefits conferred upon the assessed property are equal and uniform. Northern Pac. Ry. v. Grand Forks, 73 N.W.2d 348, 1955 N.D. LEXIS 153 (N.D. 1955).
Performance of Duties.
A special assessment commission, appointed under statutory authority and acting regularly in the discharge of its duties, is exercising functions quasi-judicial in character. Ellison v. La Moure, 30 N.D. 43, 151 N.W. 988, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 99 (N.D. 1915), writ of error dismissed, 245 U.S. 628, 38 S. Ct. 62, 62 L. Ed. 519, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1703 (U.S. 1917).
Power of Commission.
Pursuant to the express provisions of this section and N.D.C.C. §§ 40-23-05 and 40-23-15, the special-assessment commission is vested with the power and the authority to fix and determine not only the benefits but the amount of the assessment each property owner should be required to pay, subject to the statutory review by the governing body provided for by N.D.C.C. § 40-23-15. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Special assessment commission may elect whether to determine special benefits and make special assessments under this section or under N.D.C.C. ch. 40-23.1; N.D.C.C. ch. 40-23.1 does not prohibit use of square feet as a factor in determining benefits under N.D.C.C. ch. 40-23. Buehler v. Mandan, 239 N.W.2d 522, 1976 N.D. LEXIS 186 (N.D. 1976).
Plaintiff companies’ action against the city after the city’s assessment of funds against the companies for street improvement was properly dismissed; the Special Assessment Commission’s failure to assess other properties outside the improvement district was not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable under this section because the Commission lacked the authority for such an assessment. Crane Johnson Lumber Co. v. City of Fargo, 2003 ND 181, 671 N.W.2d 814, 2003 N.D. LEXIS 201 (N.D. 2003).
Statutory Requirements to Be Met.
An assessment for a street improvement upon abutting property is invalid unless it is authorized by law. Pickton v. Fargo, 10 N.D. 469, 88 N.W. 90, 1901 N.D. LEXIS 63 (N.D. 1901).
If the special assessment commission fails to comply with the statutory requirements, the assessment made is void. McKenzie v. Mandan, 27 N.D. 546, 147 N.W. 808, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 86 (N.D. 1914).
The inspection personally by members of the special assessment commission, determination of the benefits to each parcel, and a complete list of the property benefited, and the amount assessed, are prerequisites to the levying of the assessment. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012); Kvello v. Lisbon, 38 N.D. 71, 164 N.W. 305, 1917 N.D. LEXIS 15 (N.D. 1917).
If the special assessment commission fails to comply with the statutes prescribing the procedure to be followed in making the assessment, equitable relief may be invoked. Hale v. Minot, 52 N.D. 39, 201 N.W. 848, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 108 (N.D. 1924); Reed v. Langdon, 78 N.D. 991, 54 N.W.2d 148, 1952 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1952).
The three requirements that must be met for a special assessment to conform to this section are: (1) the special benefit accruing to each lot or parcel of land from the improvement must be determined; (2) the special assessment levied against each lot must be limited to its just proportion of the total cost of the improvement, and; (3) the assessment against any lot or parcel of land must not exceed the benefit which has been determined to have accrued thereto. Cloverdale Foods Co. v. Mandan, 364 N.W.2d 56, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 260 (N.D. 1985).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 464-474.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 87 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1215-1224, 1271-1290.
Agricultural fair society or association, exemption of property of, 89 A.L.R.2d 1104.
Exemption of public school property from assessments for local improvements, 15 A.L.R.3d 847.
40-23-07.1. Validation of prior assessments. [Repealed]
Repealed by omission from this code.
40-23-07.2. Assessment of common area in townhouse development.
If a townhouse development includes a right in the townhouse owners to use any lot or tract as a common area in connection with the townhouse development, the common area shall not be separately assessed for benefits but each lot or tract whose owner has a right to use the common area shall be assessed for the benefit to the common area in the proportion that each owner’s right in the common area bears to all of the owners’ rights in the common area.
Source:
S.L. 1979, ch. 446, § 1.
40-23-08. Assessments collected by suit from beneficial user of exempt property.
Whenever any real property is exempt from special assessments, or cannot be assessed, as provided in this title, for any improvement for any reason, and such real property otherwise would be assessable for such improvement, an assessment may be levied against the occupant or beneficial user of the property and collected by suit from the occupant or person enjoying the beneficial use thereof.
Source:
S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 161; R.C. 1905, § 2796; C.L. 1913, § 3721; R.C. 1943, § 40-2308; S.L. 1957, ch. 282, § 2; 1957 Supp., § 40-2308.
40-23-09. Assessment list to be prepared — Contents — Certificate attached to assessment list.
The commission shall make or cause to be made a complete list of the benefits and assessments setting forth, by legal description or street address or both, each lot or tract of land assessed, the amount each lot or tract is benefited by the improvement, and the amount assessed against each. There must be attached to the list of assessments a certificate signed by a majority of the members of the commission certifying that the same is a true and correct assessment of the property therein described to the best of their judgment and stating the several items of expense included in the assessment.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2801; S.L. 1913, ch. 85, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3726; R.C. 1943, § 40-2309; S.L. 1989, ch. 491, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Notice.
Special Assessment Commission complied with the statutory notice requirements; although the landowner claimed he was unable to locate the assessment list in the city auditor’s office, evidence established the list was located in the Special Assessment Office, which was part of the city auditor’s office. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 476-483.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1290-1298.
40-23-10. Notice of assessments and notice of hearing of objections.
- Unless otherwise provided under this section, the commission shall cause the assessment list, which list may not include the amount each lot or tract is benefited by the improvement, to be published once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official newspaper of the municipality.
- If the assessment list includes more than five thousand lots or tracts, the commission may cause it to be filed and made available for public inspection at all times after the first publication of the notice, during reasonable business hours, at such place as must be designated in the published notice.
- As an alternative to the notice procedures provided in subsections 1 and 2, the commission shall send a letter to all property owners of record on the assessment list stating their assessments. The letter may be sent by certified mail or by regular mail attested by an affidavit of mailing signed by the city auditor. When notice is provided under this subsection, the commission shall cause publication of a map outlining the assessment district with a notification stating that if an individual has not yet received a letter regarding that individual’s assessment, the individual should furnish the city auditor’s office with the individual’s present address and the auditor will then mail a copy of the individual’s assessments.
- The date set for such hearing must be not less than fifteen days after the first publication of the notice.
- A copy of the notice must be mailed to each public utility having property on the assessment list at least ten days before the hearing to its address shown on the tax rolls.
- Any notice under this section must include the time and place of a commission meeting to hear objections to assessments from an interested party or an interested party’s agent or attorney.
- Any notice under this section must be published on the city’s website.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2801; S.L. 1913, ch. 85, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3726; R.C. 1943, § 40-2310; S.L. 1965, ch. 288, § 1; 1971, ch. 406, § 1; 1989, ch. 491, § 2; 2021, ch. 305, § 2, eff August 1, 2021.
Notes to Decisions
Notice.
Special Assessment Commission complied with the statutory notice requirements; although the landowner claimed he was unable to locate the assessment list in the city auditor’s office, evidence established the list was located in the Special Assessment Office, which was part of the city auditor’s office. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
DECISIONS UNDER PRIOR LAW
Mandatory Publication.
In proceedings for special assessment for grading of street, publication of the statutory notice was mandatory under city charter. McLauren v. Grand Forks, 43 N.W. 710, 6 Dakota 397, 1889 Dakota LEXIS 27 (Dakota 1889).
40-23-11. Alteration of assessments at hearing — Limitations.
At the hearing, the commission may make such alterations in the assessments as in its opinion may be just or necessary to correct any error in the assessment list. The commission may increase or diminish any assessment as may be just and necessary to make the aggregate of all assessments equal to the total amount required to pay the entire cost of the work for which such assessments are made or the part of such cost to be paid by special assessment. No assessment shall exceed the benefits as determined by the commission to the parcel of land assessed.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2801; S.L. 1913, ch. 85, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3726; R.C. 1943, § 40-2311.
Notes to Decisions
Certified Assessment List.
Even if there were an error on the part of the assessment commission or its secretary to have certified the assessment list to the county auditor prior to the hearing before the city council, this error did not appear to have prejudiced the landowners, inasmuch as they did receive notice of the public hearing before the city council at which they had an opportunity to be heard, the hearing was apparently held, and the assessments were ultimately confirmed and certified. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 492.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 87 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1330, 1331.
40-23-12. Confirmation of assessment list after hearing — Filing list.
The special assessment commission, after the hearing, shall confirm the list and attach thereto its further certificate certifying that the list is correct as confirmed by it. The commission thereafter shall file the assessment list in the office of the city auditor.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2801; S.L. 1913, ch. 85, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3726; R.C. 1943, § 40-2312; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 156.
Notes to Decisions
Certified Assessment List.
Even if there were an error on the part of the assessment commission or its secretary to have certified the assessment list to the county auditor prior to the hearing before the city council, this error did not appear to have prejudiced the landowners, inasmuch as they did receive notice of the public hearing before the city council at which they had an opportunity to be heard, the hearing was apparently held, and the assessments were ultimately confirmed and certified. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Notice.
Special Assessment Commission complied with the statutory notice requirements; although the landowner claimed he was unable to locate the assessment list in the city auditor’s office, evidence established the list was located in the Special Assessment Office, which was part of the city auditor’s office. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Time for Judicial Review.
A judicial review of the question of benefit or detriment to the abutting property owners is premature until after the special-assessment commission has caused to be made a complete list of the benefits and assessments and has confirmed the list for certification to the office of the city auditor or the village clerk, as the case may be. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
40-23-13. Publication of notice of confirmation of assessment list and meeting for action upon assessments.
The city auditor shall publish at least once in the official newspaper of the municipality a notice stating that the assessment list has been confirmed by the special assessment commission and filed in the city auditor’s office and is open to public inspection. The notice also shall state the time when and the place where the governing body will act upon such assessment list. The assessment list shall be acted upon by the governing body at a regular or special meeting occurring more than fifteen days after the publication of such notice.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2802; S.L. 1909, ch. 53, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3727; R.C. 1943, § 40-2313; S.L. 1961, ch. 276, § 1; 1967, ch. 323, § 157.
Notes to Decisions
Notice.
Special Assessment Commission complied with the statutory notice requirements; although the landowner claimed he was unable to locate the assessment list in the city auditor’s office, evidence established the list was located in the Special Assessment Office, which was part of the city auditor’s office. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 493.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 135 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1335, 1336.
40-23-14. Aggrieved person may file notice of appeal.
Prior to the meeting at which the governing body will act upon the assessment, any aggrieved person may appeal from the action of the special assessment commission by filing with the city auditor a written notice of the appeal, stating therein the grounds upon which the appeal is based.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 166; R.C. 1905, § 2802; S.L. 1909, ch. 53, § 1; C.L. 1913, § 3727; R.C. 1943, § 40-2314; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 158.
Notes to Decisions
Certified Assessment List.
Even if there were an error on the part of the assessment commission or its secretary to have certified the assessment list to the county auditor prior to the hearing before the city council, this error did not appear to have prejudiced the landowners, inasmuch as they did receive notice of the public hearing before the city council at which they had an opportunity to be heard, the hearing was apparently held, and the assessments were ultimately confirmed and certified. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Failure to Appeal.
If no appeal is taken from the finding of a special assessment commission as to the property benefited and the amount of the benefit to each parcel, and if the finding of such commission is confirmed by the city council or board of city commissioners, the determination as to such benefits is final, and will not be disturbed by a court of equity in the absence of fraud or other ground for equitable relief. Hale v. Minot, 52 N.D. 39, 201 N.W. 848, 1924 N.D. LEXIS 108 (N.D. 1924); Reed v. Langdon, 78 N.D. 991, 54 N.W.2d 148, 1952 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1952).
Premature Appeal.
Question of whether property of abutting property owners would be benefited and the extent of such benefits was premature, where special-assessment commission had not yet confirmed list of benefits and assessments, as well as review of special assessments to be levied upon property of abutting property owners. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Right to Appeal.
Even though railroad did not appear or file objection either before or at hearing by special assessment commission, the railroad was not estopped to appeal from determination of commission; the right of appeal is not conditioned upon appearance before the commission. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
Landowner was given an opportunity to appear and speak at the October 19, 2009 City Commission hearing and he also submitted written objections to the City Commission; the landowner had an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, and the City Commission considered his objections, such that the City Commission complied with the statutory requirements for review of the assessments by the Special Assessment Commission. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
40-23-15. Governing body to hear and determine appeals and objections to assessments — Altering assessments — Limitations.
At the regular or special meeting of the governing body at which the assessment list is to be acted upon, any person aggrieved by the determination of the special assessment commission in regard to any assessment who has appealed therefrom as provided in section 40-23-14 may appear before the governing body and present the person’s reasons why the action of the commission should not be confirmed. The governing body shall hear and determine the appeals and objections and may increase or diminish any of such assessments as it may deem just, except that the aggregate amount of all the assessments returned by the commission shall not be changed and no assessments as adjusted shall exceed the benefits to the parcel of land on which it is assessed as determined by the assessment commission.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, §§ 9, 10; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326j, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 167; R.C. 1905, § 2803; C.L. 1913, § 3728; R.C. 1943, § 40-2315; S.L. 1985, ch. 460, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
- Certified Assessment List.
- Determination of Benefits and Amount of Assessment.
- Limit on Review Powers.
- Review Function Is Quasi-Judicial.
- Right to Appeal.
Certified Assessment List.
Even if there were an error on the part of the assessment commission or its secretary to have certified the assessment list to the county auditor prior to the hearing before the city council, this error did not appear to have prejudiced the landowners, inasmuch as they did receive notice of the public hearing before the city council at which they had an opportunity to be heard, the hearing was apparently held, and the assessments were ultimately confirmed and certified. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
Determination of Benefits and Amount of Assessment.
Pursuant to the express provisions of this section and N.D.C.C. §§ 40-23-05 and 40-23-07, the special-assessment commission is vested with the power and the authority to fix and determine not only the benefits but the amount of the assessment each property owner should be required to pay, subject to statutory review by the governing body provided for by this section. Murphy v. Bismarck, 109 N.W.2d 635, 1961 N.D. LEXIS 75 (N.D. 1961).
Limit on Review Powers.
Upon the hearing by the board of city commissioners or the city council, such body has the power to review and correct errors of the special assessment commission in judgment and in computation merely. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Grand Forks, 27 N.D. 556, 147 N.W. 249, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 69 (N.D. 1914), overruled in part, D&P Terminal, Inc. v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 149, 819 N.W.2d 491, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 152 (N.D. 2012).
Review Function Is Quasi-Judicial.
A city council or board of city commissioners, in reviewing the action of a special assessment commission in assessing benefits, exercises functions quasi-judicial in character. Ellison v. La Moure, 30 N.D. 43, 151 N.W. 988, 1915 N.D. LEXIS 99 (N.D. 1915), writ of error dismissed, 245 U.S. 628, 38 S. Ct. 62, 62 L. Ed. 519, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1703 (U.S. 1917).
Right to Appeal.
Even though railroad did not appear or file objection either before or at hearing by special assessment commission, the railroad was not estopped to appeal from determination of commission; the right of appeal is not conditioned upon appearance before the commission. Soo Line R.R. v. City of Wilton, 172 N.W.2d 74, 1969 N.D. LEXIS 74 (N.D. 1969).
Landowner was given an opportunity to appear and speak at the October 19, 2009 City Commission hearing and he also submitted written objections to the City Commission; the landowner had an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, and the City Commission considered his objections, such that the City Commission complied with the statutory requirements for review of the assessments by the Special Assessment Commission. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
40-23-16. Confirmation of assessment list by governing body — Certifying and filing list.
The governing body shall confirm the assessment list. The city auditor shall attach to the list the city auditor’s certificate that the list is correct as confirmed by the governing body and then shall file the list in the city auditor’s office.
Source:
S.L. 1887, ch. 73, art. 16, § 6; 1893, ch. 36, § 1; R.C. 1895, § 2320; S.L. 1897, ch. 41, § 7; 1899, ch. 41, § 9; 1899, ch. 42, § 3; R.C. 1899, §§ 2320, 2326i, 2327; S.L. 1905, ch. 62, § 167; R.C. 1905, § 2803; C.L. 1913, § 3728; R.C. 1943, § 40-2316; S.L. 1967, ch. 323, § 159.
Notes to Decisions
Certified Assessment List.
Even if there were an error on the part of the assessment commission or its secretary to have certified the assessment list to the county auditor prior to the hearing before the city council, this error did not appear to have prejudiced the landowners, inasmuch as they did receive notice of the public hearing before the city council at which they had an opportunity to be heard, the hearing was apparently held, and the assessments were ultimately confirmed and certified. Haman v. Surrey, 418 N.W.2d 605, 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30 (N.D. 1988).
40-23-17. Authority to levy assessments on property not originally assessed.
Any municipality that pays or provides for the payment of part or all of the cost of an improvement may subsequently levy special assessments for the cost of the improvement upon properties benefited by the improvement in the cases and in accordance with the procedure and subject to the conditions set forth in sections 40-23-17 through 40-23-21.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 379, § 1; 1993, ch. 404, § 1.
40-23-18. Assessments on property within the corporate limits.
A subsequent assessment may not be levied for any improvement on any property that was within the corporate limits of the municipality on the date of the execution of the first contract for any part of the improvement, unless a special improvement district was originally created for the improvement, and the property on which the subsequent assessment is to be levied was not originally assessed for the improvement but is subsequently included within another improvement district created to finance an improvement that will be connected directly or indirectly with the original improvement. Assessments under this section may be included in a separate column in the special assessment list prepared for the improvement district and levied upon the properties included in the district at the same time and upon the same notices and hearings as provided by law for the other assessments. A resolution determining the necessity of the improvement must have been adopted in the manner prescribed by law, referring to the designation of the district created for the original improvement and stating that a portion of the cost of the improvement is proposed to be assessed upon property within the improvement district.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 379, § 2; 1993, ch. 404, § 2.
40-23-19. Assessments on annexed property for previous benefits.
Any property that was outside the corporate limits of the municipality at the time of contracting for an improvement, which is benefited by the improvement and is subsequently annexed to the municipality, may be assessed for the improvement subject to the same conditions and by the same procedure as provided in section 40-23-18. The property that is benefited may also be assessed for any improvement, within or outside the corporate limits, which is determined by the governing body and the special assessment commission to benefit property that was outside the corporate limits at the time of contracting for the improvement, whether or not an improvement district was previously created for the improvement. For this purpose, the governing body may create one or more improvement districts comprising all or part of the annexed territory. The governing body may provide for the levy of special assessments upon such property in the manner provided in this title, but may dispense with the requirements of this title as to the adoption of a resolution of necessity and the advertisement and award of a contract for the improvement. Assessment proceedings under this section are valid notwithstanding any failure of the previous proceedings to comply with the provisions of law regarding improvements to be financed by special assessments. The governing body may use a reasonable depreciation schedule for the improvement in determining the amount of any special assessment subsequently levied under this section.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 379, § 3; 1993, ch. 404, § 3; 1995, ch. 392, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Statutory Authorization.
Trial court properly upheld special assessments imposed on a taxpayer’s un-platted properties because the creation of a special improvement district that included the taxpayer’s land located outside the city limits was authorized by statute. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2010 ND 168, 788 N.W.2d 354, 2010 N.D. LEXIS 173 (N.D. 2010).
40-23-20. Equalization of original assessments.
In any assessment proceedings under sections 40-23-17 through 40-23-21 the governing body of the municipality shall have power to direct the cancellation of uncollected installments of special assessments previously levied for the same improvement, and the refund of installments prepaid, to the extent determined by it to be necessary to make the original assessments and the subsequent assessments bear as nearly as possible the same relation to the total benefits derived from the improvement by the respective properties assessed.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 379, § 4.
40-23-21. Use of collections of subsequent assessments.
- All collections of special assessments levied pursuant to sections 40-23-17 through 40-23-21 shall be credited as received to the special fund maintained by the municipality for the payment of any outstanding special improvement warrants, refunding improvement bonds, general obligation bonds, or revenue bonds which were issued to finance the improvement for which the assessments were levied, or, if no such obligations are outstanding, to such fund as the governing body may direct.
- If a governing body of a municipality levied and collected an infrastructure fee under section 40-22-01.3, the funds generated by the fee must be used for the payment of any outstanding special improvement warrants, refunding improvement bonds, general obligation bonds, or revenue bonds issued to finance the improvement. The governing body of a municipality may not use funds generated by an infrastructure fee imposed after July 1, 2021, for the payment of any outstanding special improvement warrants, refunding improvement bonds, general obligation bonds, or revenue bonds, issued before July 1, 2021, for the purpose of financing green field special assessments, as defined in section 40-05.1-06.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 379, § 5; 2021, ch. 303, § 5, eff July 1, 2021.
40-23-22. State property subject to special assessments.
Real estate within municipalities of this state owned by the state of North Dakota, other than for highway right-of-way purposes, may be subjected to special assessments for special improvements when benefited by such improvement and the state agency or department having control thereof is hereby authorized to expend public funds in payment of such special assessments.
Source:
S.L. 1959, ch. 380, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
In General.
This section is an authorization to levy special assessments on state-owned property and expend public funds to pay for special assessments, but it is not an appropriation of funds for payment of special assessments. City of Fargo v. State, 260 N.W.2d 333, 1977 N.D. LEXIS 195 (N.D. 1977).
40-23-22.1. City flood control special assessment exemption for state property — Limitations.
- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, property of the state in a city subject to this section is exempt from special assessments levied for flood control purposes. Upon request by the governing body of the city, the exemption under this section may be completely or partially waived by the legislative assembly or the budget section if the legislative assembly is not in session. Any request considered by the budget section must comply with section 54-35-02.9. A city is subject to the exemption under this section in recognition of state financial assistance for flood control provided to the city pursuant to section 61-02.1-01 or other appropriation or commitment of state funds.
- The exemption under this section does not apply to any privately owned structure, fixture, or improvement located on state-owned land if the structure, fixture, or improvement is used for commercial purposes unless the structure, fixture, or improvement is primarily used for athletic or educational purposes at a state institution of higher education. An assessment allowed under this subsection must be based on the square footage or front footage of the land occupied by the structure, fixture, or improvement and made against the structure, fixture, or improvement and not against the land on which it is located.
Source:
S.L. 2001, ch. 15, § 17; 2003, ch. 346, § 1; 2009, ch. 482, § 98; 2019, ch. 438, § 7, eff August 1, 2019.
Effective Date.
The 2009 amendment of this section by section 98 of chapter 482, S.L. 2009 became effective August 1, 2009.
40-23-23. Assessments for parking improvements.
For any improvement consisting of acquiring or leasing of property and easements and construction of parking lots, ramps, garages, and other facilities for motor vehicles, whether constructed pursuant to chapter 40-22, 40-60, or 40-61 or other law authorizing a municipality to acquire facilities used and usable in connection with the parking and storing of motor vehicles, the governing body of the municipality, on or before October first in any year, may cancel all installments of special assessments theretofore levied for such facilities which are due and payable in the following year and all subsequent years, and may levy a new assessment for such facility in accordance with the law authorizing the initial levy of special assessments therefor, except that the amount to be newly assessed shall not exceed the total principal amount of the installments of assessments so canceled. The new assessment shall follow the same district lines as the original assessment district, and the same method of assessment shall be used as was used in the original assessment. If the new assessment causes any prepaid payment to be refunded, the refund plus four and one-half percent interest per annum on the refunded prepaid payment shall be paid to the person, corporation, or limited liability company who prepaid the original assessment. In determining the special benefit and levying the new assessment against any lot or parcel, the previous determination of special benefit in any previous proceeding shall not be binding upon the assessment commission or governing body, but the new assessment levied on any lot or parcel, together with the principal amount of the installments of special assessments previously paid or to be paid in the current year for that lot or parcel with respect to that facility to be assessed, if any, shall not exceed the total special benefit to the lot or parcel from the facility for which the assessment is levied. In levying new assessments pursuant to this authority, an assessment commission and governing body of a municipality may take into account any changes in conditions affecting the benefits derived and to be derived from the improvement for which the assessments were initially levied against the respective properties assessed. Provided, however, that in canceling any special assessments previously levied and in levying new special assessments, a municipality cannot violate any covenants or agreements which it has made with holders of any obligations issued by the municipality to finance the acquisition of that improvement.
Source:
S.L. 1971, ch. 407, § 1; 1993, ch. 54, § 106.
40-23-24. Audit of certain special assessment improvements.
If the costs of an improvement determined and assessed under section 40-23-07 or 40-23.1-04 exceed the costs of the work as contained in the engineer’s estimate under section 40-22-10 by seventy percent or more, the governing body of the city shall secure an audit of all costs included in the assessment for the project, prepared in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The audit report must include a separate statement of the engineer’s estimate of the cost of the work, the actual cost of the work, the cost of extra work, engineering fees, fiscal agent’s fees, attorney’s fees, publication costs, warrant printing costs, interest costs, and each separate item of expense incurred in making the improvement and levying the assessment for the improvement. The city shall make a copy of the audit report available without charge to any person who requests a copy. The audit report is not required if the costs of an improvement exceed the costs of the work as contained in the engineer’s estimate by seventy percent or more because of a petition to enlarge the district under section 40-22-09 or a request for additional work within the district by the owners of a majority of the area of the property in the district. Audit and copying expenses under this section must be paid by the city and may not be paid from special assessment funds.
Source:
S.L. 2003, ch. 347, § 1.
Notes to Decisions
Compliance.
Plain language evidenced a legislative intent that the engineer’s report and resolution of necessity contained an estimate of the cost of the project and that the final cost and amount to be assessed could exceed the amounts listed in the resolution of necessity and engineer’s report; the landowner did not claim the city failed to comply with N.D.C.C. §§ 40-22-29 or 40-23-24, and the total amount of the special assessments did not improperly exceed the amounts estimated in the resolution of necessity and engineer’s report. Hector v. City of Fargo, 2012 ND 80, 815 N.W.2d 240, 2012 N.D. LEXIS 72 (N.D. 2012).
40-23-25. Future assessments on annexed property.
The special assessment commission shall prepare and file with the city auditor a list of estimated future assessments on property located outside the corporate limits of the city at the time of contracting for an improvement but which the special assessment commission determines is potentially benefited by the improvement and likely to be annexed to the city.
Source:
S.L. 2003, ch. 347, § 2.
CHAPTER 40-23.1 An Alternative Method of Determining and Allocating Special Assessments
40-23.1-01. Improvement district — All property to be assessed — Basis.
All property included within the limits of a local improvement district shall be considered to be the property specially benefited by the local improvement and shall be the property to be assessed to pay the cost and expense thereof or such part thereof as may be chargeable against the property specially benefited. The cost and expense shall be assessed upon all the property in accordance with the special benefits conferred thereon in proportion to area and distance back from the marginal line of the public way or area improved.
Source:
S.L. 1967, ch. 332, § 1.
Collateral References.
Municipal Corporations 450, 456-475.
70 Am. Jur. 2d, Special or Local Assessments, §§ 93 et seq.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations, §§ 1193-1214, 1250-1254.
40-23.1-02. Improvement district — Zones.
For the purpose of ascertaining the amount to be assessed against each separate lot, tract, parcel of land, or other property therein, the local improvement district shall be divided into subdivisions or zones paralleling the margin of the street, avenue, lane, alley, boulevard, park drive, parkway, public place, or public square to be improved, numbered respectively first, second, third, fourth, and fifth.
The first subdivision shall include all lands within the district lying between the street margins and lines drawn parallel therewith and thirty feet [9.14 meters] therefrom.
The second subdivision shall include all lands within the district lying between lines drawn parallel with and thirty and sixty feet [9.14 and 18.29 meters] respectively from the street margins.
The third subdivision shall include all lands within the district lying between lines drawn parallel with and sixty and ninety feet [18.29 and 27.43 meters] respectively from the street margins.
The fourth subdivision shall include all lands, if any, within the district lying between lines drawn parallel with and ninety and one hundred twenty feet [27.43 and 36.58 meters] respectively