Chapter 1
State Veterinarian [Transferred]
Compiler's Notes. Former Chapter 1, §§ 44-1-101 — 44-1-105, concerning the state veterinarian, was transferred to title 43, ch. 1, part 3.
The subsequent sections (title 43, ch. 1, part 3) were repealed by Acts 1988, ch. 878, § 19.
Chapter 2
Prevention and Treatment of Diseases
Part 1
General Provisions
44-2-101. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Animal” or “animals” means all domestic animals including, but not limited to, cattle, bison, all equidae, sheep, goats, swine, dogs, cats, all avian species, and all Class III animals as established by § 70-4-403;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
- “Department” means the Tennessee department of agriculture;
- “Disease” means any communicable disease deemed appropriate for regulatory control measures by the state veterinarian;
- “Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership and any association of two (2) or more persons having a joint or common interest; and
- “USDA” means the United States department of agriculture.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1301.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-2-101 — 44-2-123 (Acts 1881, ch. 101, §§ 1, 2; 1885 (E.S.), ch. 17, §§ 1, 2; 1889, ch. 268, §§ 1, 2; 1895, ch. 168, §§ 1, 2; 1897, ch. 42, §§ 1, 5, 6; 1897, ch. 51, § 1; 1901, ch. 156, §§ 1, 5-13; 1905, ch. 152, § 1; 1907, ch. 68, §§ 2-4; 1907, ch. 428, § 1; 1909, ch. 85, § 1; 1913, ch. 5, § 1; 1913, ch. 14, § 1; 1913, ch. 16, § 1; Shan. §§ 2788, 2789, 2789a1, 2789a5-2789a13, 2789a15, 2815, 2816, 2838, 2839, 2839a1, 2839a2; Acts 1927, ch. 7, §§ 1, 2; Code 1932, §§ 5019-5021, 5025-5035, 5059-5064; Acts 1939, ch. 40, § 1; 1947, ch. 46, § 1; Acts 1968, ch. 409, §§ 1-3; 1971, ch. 313, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-401, 44-405 — 44-415, 44-422 — 44-432; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), which contained general provisions pertaining to animal health regulation, was repealed by Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 31.
Law Reviews.
The Standard of Care for Veterinarians in Medical Malpractice Claims (Joseph H. King, Jr.), 58 Tenn. L. Rev. 1 (1990).
Collateral References. 4 Am. Jur. 2d Animals §§ 32, 33.
3A C.J.S. Animals §§ 66, 67.
Communicable disease, sale of livestock inflicted with. 14 A.L.R.4th 1096.
Construction of provisions of statute or ordinance governing occasion, time, or manner of summary destruction of domestic animals by public authorities. 42 A.L.R.4th 839.
Animals 4.
44-2-102. Supervisory powers.
The commissioner and the state veterinarian have the general supervision of all animals within or that may be in transit through the state, and they are empowered to:
- Establish a quarantine against any animal or animals within or entering the state;
- Enter any premises in which animals are likely kept for the purpose of examining, inspecting or testing for the purpose of disease control;
- Prohibit or regulate the importation of animals into this state whenever it is necessary to protect the health of animals in Tennessee;
- Order tests or vaccinations of animals within the state or imported into the state for the purpose of protecting the health of animals in Tennessee;
- Order the destruction and sanitary disposition of any animal, whenever, in the opinion of the state veterinarian, the interests of the state are best served by the destruction of that animal. This destruction may be ordered only for control of any animal disease for which the state has a control program, or for any animal disease not known to exist in the United States;
- Order the sanitary disposition of any dead animal. The owner of such animal shall be liable for its disposition;
- Stop and inspect or examine vehicles likely to be hauling animals for the purposes of disease control and determining compliance with this chapter;
- Order the cleaning and disinfection of any premises, vehicle or equipment for the purpose of animal disease control;
- Promulgate in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, all rules and regulations necessary to carry out this chapter;
- Impose in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, civil penalties of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation of this chapter or the rules and regulations promulgated under this chapter;
- Cooperate with the government of the United States and may designate employees of USDA as agents of the department in carrying out the purposes of this chapter;
- Call upon other law enforcement agencies for assistance when the public safety and welfare is threatened; and
- File suit in a court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of enjoining the further violation of this chapter.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1302.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, §§ 31, 38.
44-2-103. Prohibited acts.
It is unlawful for any person to:
- Willfully hinder, obstruct, disregard or evade any quarantine or order the commissioner or state veterinarian may issue under this chapter;
- Distribute, sell or use any veterinary vaccine, antiserum, or diagnostic antigen or other veterinary biologic products unless licensed by the USDA and permitted by the department;
- Refuse to allow the commissioner or the state veterinarian or any person acting under the commissioner's or state veterinarian's authority to inspect or examine any animal reported or suspected to be infected with any communicable disease, or for the owner of such animals to fail to present them for testing or to fail to render reasonable assistance in testing of the animals;
- Knowingly sell, trade or import into this state any animal or animals infected with a communicable disease; or
- Violate any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to this chapter.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1303.
44-2-104. Penalties.
A violation of this chapter is a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1304.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A misdemeanors, § 40-35-111.
44-2-105. Indemnity for destroyed animals.
The commissioner through rules and regulations may establish procedures for the payment of indemnities for animals destroyed under authority of this chapter. Indemnity under this section is not intended to be a full reimbursement but a partial compensation based on, but not limited to, the value of the animal and the availability of funds for that purpose. Indemnification may be disallowed in cases where the owner is in violation of this chapter.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1305.
44-2-106. Federally accredited veterinarians — Inspections, vaccinations and tests.
Veterinarians accredited under Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations and licensed by the state board of veterinary medical examiners may be authorized to make necessary inspections, vaccinations, and tests required by this chapter or its regulations.
Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-2-1306.
Part 2
Import Restrictions [Repealed]
44-2-201 — 44-2-205. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 2, §§ 44-2-201 — 44-2-205 (Acts 1909, ch. 475, §§ 1-5; Shan. §§ 2789a18-2789a22; Code 1932, §§ 5037-5040, 5054; Acts 1947, ch. 46, § 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-417 — 44-421; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning health-related animal import restrictions, was repealed by Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 2.
Part 3
Serums [Repealed]
44-2-301, 44-2-302. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 3, §§ 44-2-301, 44-2-302 (Acts 1917, ch. 99, §§ 1, 2; Shan. §§ 6800a13, 6800a14; Code 1932, §§ 11272, 11273; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-501, 44-502; T.C.A., §§ 44-4-101, 44-4-102; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning animal serums, was repealed by Acts 1993, ch. 109, § 3.
Part 4
Feeding Garbage to Swine
44-2-401. Title.
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Tennessee Garbage Feeding Law.”
Acts 1953, ch. 94, § 1 (Williams, § 5066.18); modified; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1001, 44-5-101.
Cross-References. Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
44-2-402. Part definitions.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
- “Garbage” means animal or plant waste resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking or consumption of foods, including animal and fowl carcasses or parts thereof, and all waste material and by-products of a kitchen, restaurant, hospital, hotel, motel, or slaughterhouse; except, however, bakery waste, whey, or other dairy waste from milk processing plants shall not be included in this definition; and
- “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity or any organization, political subdivision or governmental agency.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1002, 44-5-102.
Compiler's Notes. Sections 33-1002 — 44-1012 (Acts 1953, ch. 94, §§ 2-8; Williams §§ 5066.19-5066.25) were repealed by Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 1. The present §§ 44-2-402 — 44-2-408 (formerly §§ 44-5-102 — 44-5-108) were enacted by § 2 of Acts 1973, ch. 17.
44-2-403. Enforcing official.
This part shall be enforced and administered by the commissioner or the commissioner's designated representative.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1003, 44-5-103.
44-2-404. When feeding garbage to swine allowed.
It is unlawful for any person to feed garbage to swine except:
- Any individual who feeds only that person's own household garbage to that person's own swine; or
- Garbage that has been processed in a manner prescribed and approved by the commissioner.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1004, 44-5-104.
44-2-405. Rules and regulations.
The commissioner may promulgate such rules and regulations as, in the commissioner's opinion, are necessary to implement this part.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1005, 44-5-105.
44-2-406. Inspection of premises.
The commissioner or the commissioner's designated representative may enter upon any premises, public or private, for the purpose of determining if a violation of this part has occurred.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1006, 44-5-106.
44-2-407. Penalty for violations.
- A violation of this part by any person is a Class C misdemeanor.
- Each illegal feeding of garbage is to be considered a separate offense.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1007, 44-5-107; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-2-408. Enjoining violations of law.
The commissioner, upon determining that any person may have violated any provision of this part, may petition for injunctive relief from further violation. The petition shall be addressed to the chancery court in the county in which the offense occurred or in which the offender's principal place of business is located or where the offender is doing business or resides. The chancellor, on determining that probable cause of a violation of this part exists, shall issue appropriate injunctive relief.
Acts 1973, ch. 17, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 44-1008, 44-5-108.
Parts 5-9
[Reserved]
Chapter 3
Animal Diseases [Transferred]
Part 1
Brucellosis [Transferred]
44-3-101 — 44-3-114. [Transferred.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-3-101 — 44-3-114, concerning brucellosis, was transferred to ch. 2, part 10 of this title in 1987.
Chapter 4
Serums [Transferred]
Chapter 5
Animal Feeding [Transferred]
Chapter 6
Commercial Feed Law
44-6-101. Short title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Tennessee Commercial Feed Law of 1972.”
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1118.
Cross-References. Commercial feed lot proprietors' and operators' lien, § 66-20-106.
Exemption of livestock and poultry feeds from sales and use taxes, § 67-6-329.
Comparative Legislation. Commercial feed:
Ala. Code § 2-21-16 et seq.
Ark. Code § 2-37-101 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 2-13-1 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 250.491 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-45-151 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 266.152 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 106-284.30 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-828.1 et seq.
Collateral References. 3 Am. Jur. 2d Agriculture § 56 et seq.
Agriculture 2.
44-6-102. Administration by commissioner of agriculture.
This chapter shall be administered by the commissioner of agriculture.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-1119.
44-6-103. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Brand name” means any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, identifying the commercial feed of a distributor or registrant and distinguishing it from that of others;
- “Commercial feed” means all materials except unmixed seed, whole and unprocessed, when not adulterated within the meaning of this chapter, that are offered for sale as feed or mixing for feed; provided, that the commissioner by regulation may exempt from this definition, or from specific provisions of this chapter, commodities such as hay, straw, stover, silage, cobs, husks, hulls, hemp, as defined in § 43-27-101, and individual compounds or substances, when those commodities, compounds, or substances are not intermixed or mixed with other materials and, except for hemp, are not adulterated within the meaning of this chapter;
- “Commercial feed facility” or “licensed commercial feed facility” means a facility that manufactures or distributes commercial feed in this state and that is subject to licensure pursuant to this chapter;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture, or the commissioner's authorized agent;
- “Contract feeder” means a person who, as an independent contractor, feeds commercial feed to animals pursuant to a contract, whereby the commercial feed is supplied, furnished, or otherwise provided to the person and whereby the person's remuneration is determined all or in part by feed, consumption, mortality, profits, or amount or quality of product;
- “Customer-formula feed” means commercial feed that consists of a mixture of two (2) or more commercial feeds or a mixture of one (1) or more commercial feeds and one (1) or more feed ingredients or a mixture of two (2) or more feed ingredients, each batch of which is manufactured according to the specific instructions of the final purchaser;
- “Distribute” means to offer for sale, sell, exchange, or barter commercial feed or customer-formula feed;
- “Distributor” means any person who distributes;
- “Drug” means any article intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in animals other than humans, and articles other than feed intended to affect the structure or function of any part of the animal body;
- “Feed ingredient” means each of the constituent materials making up a commercial feed;
- [Deleted by 2019 amendment.]
- “Label” means a display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon or affixed to the container in which a commercial feed is distributed, or on the invoice or delivery slip with which a commercial feed is distributed;
-
“Labeling” means all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter:
- Upon commercial feed or any of its containers or wrapper; or
- Accompanying commercial feed;
- “Manufacture” means to grind, mix or blend, or further process a commercial feed for distribution;
- “Mineral feed” means a commercial feed intended to supply primarily mineral elements or inorganic nutrients;
- “Official sample” means a sample of feed taken by the commissioner or the commissioner's agent in accordance with § 44-6-111(c), (e) or (f);
- “Percent” or “percentage” means percentage by weight;
- “Person” includes individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity;
- “Pet” means any domesticated animal normally maintained in or near the household of its owner;
- “Pet food” means any commercial feed prepared and distributed for consumption by pets;
- “Product name” means the name of the commercial feed that identifies it as to kind, class, or specific use;
- “Quantity statement” means the net weight (mass), net volume (liquid or dry) or count;
- “Specialty pet” means any domesticated animal pet normally maintained in a cage or tank, such as, but not limited to, gerbils, hamsters, canaries, psittacines, birds, mynahs, finches, tropical fish, goldfish, snakes and turtles;
- “Specialty pet food” means any commercial feed prepared and distributed for consumption by specialty pets; and
- “Ton” means a net weight of two thousand pounds (2,000 lbs.) avoirdupois.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 3; T.C.A., § 44-1120; Acts 1997, ch. 55, §§ 1, 9-11; 2018, ch. 673, §§ 1, 2; 2019, ch. 87, §§ 9, 10.
Amendments. The 2018 amendment, in the definition of “commercial feed”, inserted “, industrial hemps,” and substituted “with other materials and, except for industrial hemp,” for “with other materials, and”; and added the definition of “industrial hemp”.
The 2019 amendment, in the definition of “commercial feed”, substituted “hemp, as defined in § 43-27-101” for “industrial hemps”, and substituted “except for hemp” for “except for industrial hemp”; and deleted the former definition of “industrial hemp” which read: “ ‘Industrial hemp’ has the same meaning as defined in § 43-26-102;”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2018, ch. 673, § 3. April 12, 2018.
Acts 2019, ch. 87, § 13. April 4, 2019.
44-6-104. License requirement — Application — Fees — Refusal of license — Hearing.
- Any person who manufactures a commercial feed within the state, who distributes a commercial feed in or into the state, or whose name appears on the label of a commercial feed as guarantor shall obtain a license for each facility from which commercial feed is distributed in or into the state, authorizing the person to manufacture or distribute commercial feed before engaging in the activity. Any person who makes only retail sales of commercial feed that bears labeling or other approved indication that the commercial feed is from a licensed manufacturer, guarantor, or distributor is not required to obtain a license.
- Any person who is required to obtain a license shall submit an application on a form provided by or approved by the commissioner, accompanied by payment in the amount set by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703 for each facility. Each license shall expire on July 1 of the year for which it is issued.
- The form and content of the commercial feed license application shall be established by rules promulgated by the commissioner.
- The commissioner is empowered to refuse to issue a license to any person not in compliance with this chapter and to cancel the license of any licensee subsequently found not to be in compliance with any provision of this chapter; provided, that no license shall be refused or canceled unless the applicant or licensee has been given an opportunity to be heard before the commissioner and to amend the applicant's or licensee's application in order to comply with the requirements of this chapter.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 4; T.C.A., § 44-1121; Acts 1997, ch. 55, § 2; 2015, ch. 485, § 16.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote the section, which read: “(a) Any person:“(1) Who manufactures a commercial feed within the state; or“(2) Who distributes a commercial feed in or into the state; or“(3) Whose name appears on the label of a commercial feed as guarantor“shall obtain a license for each facility from which commercial feed is distributed in or into the state authorizing the person to manufacture or distribute commercial feed before engaging in such activity. Any person who makes only retail sales of commercial feed that bears labeling or other approved indication that the commercial feed is from a licensed manufacturer, guarantor, or distributor who has assumed full responsibility for the tonnage inspection fee due under this chapter is not required to obtain a license.“(b) Any person who is required to obtain a license shall submit an application on a form provided or approved by the commissioner, accompanied by a license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) per facility to be paid to the commissioner. The license fee shall be applied to any inspection fees imposed pursuant to § 44-6-109. The license year shall be the calendar year. Each license shall expire on December 31 of the year for which it is issued; provided, that any license shall be valid through February of the next ensuing year or until the issuance of the renewal license, whichever event first occurs, if the holder thereof has filed a renewal application with the commissioner on or before December 31 of the year for which the current license was issued. Any new applicant who fails to obtain a license within fifteen (15) working days of notification of the requirement to obtain a license, or any licensee who fails to comply with license renewal requirements, shall pay a twenty-five dollar ($25.00) late fee in addition to the license fee.“(c) The form and content of the commercial feed license application shall be established by rules promulgated by the commissioner.“(d) The commissioner may request from a license applicant or licensee, at any time, copies of labels and labeling in order to determine compliance with this section.“(e) The commissioner is empowered to refuse to issue a license to any person not in compliance with this chapter and to cancel the license of any licensee subsequently found not to be in compliance with any provisions of this chapter; provided, that no license shall be refused or cancelled unless the applicant or licensee has been given an opportunity to be heard before the commissioner and to amend the applicant's or licensee's application in order to comply with the requirements of this chapter.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
44-6-105. Labeling.
A commercial feed shall be labeled as follows:
-
In case of a commercial feed, except a customer-formula feed, it shall be accompanied by a label bearing the following information:
- The quantity statement;
- The product name and the brand name, if any, under which the commercial feed is distributed;
- The guaranteed analysis stated in such terms, as the commissioner by regulation determines, is required to advise the user of the composition of the feed or to support claims made in the labeling. In all cases the substances or elements must be determinable by laboratory methods published by the AOAC International, or other methods approved by regulation;
- The common or usual name of each ingredient used in the manufacture of the commercial feed; provided, that the commissioner by regulation may permit the use of a collective term for a group of ingredients that perform a similar function, or the commissioner may exempt commercial feeds, or any group thereof, from this requirement of an ingredient statement if the commissioner finds that this statement is not required in the interest of consumers;
- The name and principal mailing address of the manufacturer or the person responsible for distributing the commercial feed;
- For those commercial feeds containing drugs, and for such other feeds as the commissioner may require by regulation, adequate directions for their safe and effective use; and
- Such precautionary statements as the commissioner by regulation determines are necessary for the safe and effective use of the commercial feed; and
-
In the case of a customer-formula feed, it shall be accompanied by a label, invoice, delivery slip, or other shipping document, bearing the following information:
- Name and address of the manufacturer;
- Name and address of the purchaser;
- Date of delivery;
- The product name and brand name, if any, and the net weight of each registered commercial feed used in the mixture, and the net weight of each other ingredient used;
- For those customer-formula feeds containing drugs, and for such other feeds as the commissioner may require by regulation, adequate directions for their safe and effective use; and
- Such precautionary statements as the commissioner by regulation determines are necessary for the safe and effective use of the customer-formula feed.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 5; T.C.A., § 44-1122; Acts 1997, ch. 55, §§ 3, 4.
44-6-106. Misbranding.
A commercial feed shall be deemed to be misbranded if:
- Its labeling is false or misleading in any particular;
- It is distributed under the name of another commercial feed;
- It is not labeled as required in § 44-6-105;
- It purports to be or is represented as a commercial feed, or if it purports to contain or is represented as containing a commercial feed ingredient, unless the commercial feed or feed ingredient conforms to the definition, if any, prescribed by regulation by the commissioner; or
- Any word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this chapter to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 6; T.C.A., § 44-1123.
44-6-107. Adulteration.
A commercial feed shall be deemed to be adulterated if:
-
- It bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance that may render it injurious to health; but in case the substance is not an added substance, the commercial feed shall not be considered adulterated under this subdivision (1)(A), if the quantity of the substance in the commercial feed does not ordinarily render it injurious to health;
-
It bears or contains any added poisonous, added deleterious, or added nonnutritive substance that is unsafe within the meaning of § 406 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, other than one that is:
- A pesticide chemical in or on a raw agricultural commodity; or
- A food additive;
- It is, or it bears or contains any food additive that is unsafe within the meaning of § 409 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
- It is a raw agricultural commodity and it bears or contains a pesticide chemical that is unsafe within the meaning of § 408(a) of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; provided, that where a pesticide chemical has been used in or on a raw agricultural commodity in conformity with an exemption granted or a tolerance prescribed under § 408 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the raw agricultural commodity has been subjected to processing, such as canning, cooking, freezing, dehydrating, or milling, the residue of the pesticide chemical remaining in or on the processed feed shall not be deemed unsafe if the residue in or on the raw agricultural commodity has been removed to the extent possible in good manufacturing practice and the concentration of the residue in the processed feed is not greater than the tolerance prescribed for the raw agricultural commodity, unless the feeding of such processed feed will result or is likely to result in a pesticide residue in the edible product of the animal that is unsafe within the meaning of § 408(a) of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
- It is, or it bears or contains any color additive that is unsafe within the meaning of § 706 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
- It is, or it bears or contains any new animal drug that is unsafe within the meaning of § 512 of the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act;
- It consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid or decomposed substance, or if it is otherwise unfit for feed;
- It has been prepared, packed, or held under unsanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health;
- It is, in whole or in part, the product of a diseased animal or of an animal that has died otherwise than by slaughter that is unsafe within the meaning of § 402 (a)(1) or (2) of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
- Its container is composed, in whole or in part, of any poisonous or deleterious substance that may render the contents injurious to health; or
- It has been intentionally subjected to radiation, unless the use of the radiation was in conformity with the regulations or exemptions in effect pursuant to § 409 of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
- Any valuable constituent has been in whole or in part omitted or abstracted therefrom or any less valuable substance substituted therefor;
- Its composition or quality falls below or differs from that which it is purported or is represented to possess by its labeling;
- It contains a drug and the methods used in or the facilities or controls used for its manufacture, processing, or packaging do not conform to current good manufacturing practice regulations promulgated by the commissioner to assure that the drug meets the requirements of this chapter as to safety and has the identity and strength and meets the quality and purity characteristics that it purports or is represented to possess. In promulgating such regulations, the commissioner shall adopt the current good manufacturing practice regulations for Type A Medicated Articles and Type B and Type C Medicated Feeds established under authority of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, unless the commissioner determines that they are not appropriate to the conditions that exist in this state; or
- It contains viable weed seeds in amounts exceeding the limits that the commissioner establishes by rule or regulation.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 7; T.C.A., § 44-1124; Acts 1997, ch. 55, §§ 5, 6.
Compiler's Notes. The federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in this section, is codified in 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-392. Sections 402, 406, 408, 409 and 512 of that act are codified at 21 U.S.C. §§ 342, 346, 346a, 348 and 360b, respectively; former § 706 of that act was redesignated as § 721 of the act in 1992 and is now codified at 21 U.S.C. § 379e.
44-6-108. Prohibited acts.
The following acts and the causing of the following acts within this state are prohibited:
- The manufacture or distribution of any commercial feed that is adulterated or misbranded;
- The adulteration or misbranding of any commercial feed;
- The distribution of agricultural commodities, such as whole seed, hay, straw, stover, silage, cobs, husks, and hulls, that are adulterated within the meaning of § 44-6-107(1);
- The removal or disposal of a commercial feed in violation of an order under § 44-6-112;
- The failure or refusal to register in accordance with § 44-6-104; and
- Failure to pay inspection fees and file reports as required by former § 44-6-109 [repealed].
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 8; T.C.A., § 44-1125.
Compiler's Notes. Section 44-6-109, referred to in (6), was repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 17, effective July 1, 2015.
44-6-109. [Repealed.]
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 9; T.C.A., § 44-1126; Acts 1980, ch. 538, § 1; 1997, ch. 55, § 7; 2008, ch. 787, § 1; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 17, effective July 1, 2015.
Compiler's Note. Former § 44-6-109 concerned inspection fees; condition for license; reports.
44-6-110. Rules and regulations.
The commissioner is authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations for commercial feeds and pet foods as are specifically authorized in this chapter, and such other reasonable rules and regulations as may be necessary for the efficient enforcement of this chapter. In the interest of uniformity, the commissioner shall by regulation adopt, unless the commissioner determines that they are inconsistent with this chapter or are not appropriate to conditions that exist in this state, the following:
- The official definitions of feed ingredients and official feed terms adopted by the Association of American Feed Control Officials and published in the official publication of that organization; and
- Any regulation promulgated pursuant to the authority of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.).
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 10; T.C.A., § 44-1127.
44-6-111. Inspection — Sampling — Analysis.
-
For the purpose of enforcement of this chapter, and in order to determine whether its provisions have been complied with, including whether or not any operations may be subject to the provisions, officers or employees duly designated by the commissioner, upon presenting appropriate credentials, are authorized to:
- Enter, during normal business hours, any factory, warehouse, or establishment within the state in which commercial feeds are manufactured, processed, packed, or held for distribution, or to enter any vehicle being used to transport or hold commercial feeds; and
-
- Inspect at reasonable times and within reasonable limits and in a reasonable manner, such a factory, warehouse, establishment, or vehicle, and all pertinent equipment, finished and unfinished materials, containers, and labeling therein.
- The inspection may include the verification of only such records and production and control procedures as may be necessary to determine compliance with the good manufacturing practice regulations established under § 44-6-107(4).
- A separate notice shall be given for each such inspection, but a notice shall not be required for each entry made during the period covered by the inspection. Each such inspection shall be commenced and completed with reasonable promptness. Upon completion of the inspection, the person in charge of the facility or vehicle shall be so notified.
- If the officer or employee making such an inspection of a factory, warehouse, or other establishment has obtained a sample in the course of the inspection, upon completion of the inspection and prior to leaving the premises, the officer or employee shall give to the owner, operator, or agent in charge a receipt describing the samples obtained.
- If the owner of any factory, warehouse, or establishment described in subsection (a), or the owner's agent, refuses to admit the commissioner, or the commissioner's agent, to inspect in accordance with subsections (a) and (b), the commissioner is authorized to obtain from any state court a court order directing the owner or the owner's agent to submit the premises described in the warrant to inspection.
- For the purpose of the enforcement of this chapter, the commissioner or the commissioner's duly designated agent is authorized to enter upon any public or private premises, including any vehicle of transport, during regular business hours to have access to, to obtain samples of, and to examine records relating to distribution of, commercial feeds.
- Sampling and analysis shall be conducted in accordance with methods published by the AOAC International, or in accordance with other generally recognized methods.
- The results of all analyses of official samples shall be forwarded by the commissioner to the person named on the label. When the inspection and analysis of an official sample indicate a commercial feed has been adulterated or misbranded, the commissioner shall furnish to the registrant a portion of the sample concerned if the registrant requests it within thirty (30) days of notification.
- The commissioner, in determining for administrative purposes whether a commercial feed is deficient in any component, shall be guided by the official sample as defined in § 44-6-103 and obtained and analyzed as provided for in subsections (c), (e), and (f).
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 11; T.C.A., § 44-1128; Acts 1997, ch. 55, § 8.
44-6-112. Withdrawal, condemnation and confiscation orders.
- When the commissioner or the commissioner's authorized agent has reasonable cause to believe any lot of commercial feed is being distributed in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or of any of the prescribed regulations under this chapter, the commissioner or the commissioner's agent may issue and enforce a written or printed “withdrawal from distribution” order, warning the distributor not to dispose of the lot of commercial feed in any manner until written permission is given by the commissioner or the court. The commissioner shall release the lot of commercial feed so withdrawn when the provisions and regulations have been complied with. If compliance is not obtained within thirty (30) days, the commissioner may begin, or upon request of the distributor or registrant shall begin, proceedings for condemnation.
- Any lot of commercial feed not in compliance with any of the provisions of this chapter or of any of the prescribed regulations under this chapter shall be subject to seizure on complaint of the commissioner to a court of competent jurisdiction in the area in which the commercial feed is located. In the event the court finds the commercial feed to be in violation of this chapter and orders the condemnation of the commercial feed, it shall be disposed of in any manner consistent with the quality of the commercial feed and the laws of the state; provided, that in no instance shall the disposition of the commercial feed be ordered by the court without first giving the claimant an opportunity to apply to the court for release of the commercial feed or for permission to process or relabel the commercial feed to bring it into compliance with this chapter.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 12; T.C.A., § 44-1129.
44-6-113. Violation a misdemeanor — Penalties — Construction — Injunction — Judicial review.
- Any person convicted of violating any of the provisions of this chapter or who impedes, hinders or otherwise prevents, or attempts to prevent, the commissioner or the commissioner's duly authorized agent in performance of that official's duty in connection with this chapter commits a Class C misdemeanor. In all prosecutions under this chapter involving the composition of a lot of commercial feed, a certified copy of the official analysis signed by the commissioner or the commissioner's authorized agent shall be accepted as prima facie evidence of the composition.
-
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as requiring the commissioner or the commissioner's representative to:
- Report for prosecution;
- Institute seizure proceedings; or
-
Issue a withdrawal from distribution order,
as a result of minor violations of this chapter, or when that official believes the public interest will best be served by suitable notice of warning in writing.
- The commissioner is authorized to apply for, and the court to grant, a temporary or permanent injunction restraining any person from violating or continuing to violate any of the provisions of this chapter or any rule or regulation promulgated under this chapter, notwithstanding the existence of other remedies at law. The injunction is to be issued without bond.
- Any person adversely affected by an act, order or ruling made pursuant to this chapter may within forty-five (45) days thereafter bring action in the chancery court of Davidson County, or the chancery court in the county of the residence or principal place of business of the party adversely affected, for judicial review of the act, order or ruling. The form of the proceeding shall be any that may be provided by statutes of this state to review decisions of administrative agencies, or in the absence or inadequacy thereof, any applicable form of legal action, including actions for declaratory judgments or writs of prohibitory or mandatory injunctions.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 13; T.C.A., § 44-1130; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Compiler's Notes. Subsection (d) of this section is superseded by § 4-5-322(b) to the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between this subsection and § 4-5-322(b). See § 4-5-103.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-6-114. Cooperation with other entities.
The commissioner may cooperate with and enter into agreements with governmental agencies of this state, other states, agencies of the federal government, and private associations in order to carry out the purpose and provisions of this chapter.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 14; T.C.A., § 44-1131.
44-6-115. Publications.
The commissioner shall publish at least annually, in such forms as the commissioner may deem proper, information concerning the sales of commercial feeds, together with such data on their production and use as the commissioner may consider advisable, and a report of the results of the analyses of official samples of commercial feeds sold within the state as compared with the analyses guaranteed in the registration and on the label; provided, that the information concerning production and use of commercial feed shall not disclose the operations of any single person or company.
Acts 1972, ch. 488, § 15; T.C.A., § 44-1132.
Chapter 7
Marks, Brands, Registration and Certification
Part 1
General Provisions
44-7-101. Marks and brands of animals running at large.
Any person owning any cattle, hogs, sheep or goats, horses or other animals, running at large, shall have an earmark or brand different from those of that person's neighbors.
Code 1858, § 1654 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 6); Shan., § 2840; Code 1932, § 5067; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1201.
Cross-References. Brands and trade-marks of timber, § 43-28-311.
Annual license fee for distributors of commercial fertilizers, § 43-11-104.
Registration of products, registered brands, § 43-8-104.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 36.
Comparative Legislation. Brands and marks required:
Ala. Code § 2-15-20 et seq.
Ark. Code § 2-34-101 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 4-2-1 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 253.010 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 69-29-1 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 268.011 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 80-45, 80-57 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-796.29 et seq.
Collateral References. 4 Am. Jur. 2d Animals §§ 8, 9.
3A C.J.S. Animals §§ 24, 26.
Animals 8.
44-7-102. Recording marks and brands.
Marks or brands shall be recorded in the office of the county clerk of the county in which the animals run; but the same brand or marks shall not be recorded to more than one (1) person in the same county.
Code 1858, § 1655 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 6); Shan., § 2841; Code 1932, § 5068; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1202.
Cross-References. Registration of cattle brands, title 44, chapter 7, part 2.
44-7-103. Priority of marks and brands.
When a dispute occurs in regard to a brand or mark, the person first recording the same is entitled thereto.
Code 1858, § 1656; Shan., § 2842; Code 1932, § 5069; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1203.
44-7-104. Horses and cattle to be branded.
The owner shall brand all horses, from eighteen (18) months old and upwards, with the same brand, and earmark and brand all the owner's cattle from twelve (12) months old and upwards with the same mark or brand.
Code 1858, § 1657 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 6); Shan., § 2843; Code 1932, § 5070; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1204.
44-7-105. Deciding dispute as to marks and brands.
If any dispute arise about an earmark or brand, it shall be decided according to entries on the book of the county clerk.
Code 1858, § 1658 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 6); Shan., § 2844; mod. Code 1932, § 5071; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1205.
44-7-106. Neat cattle purchased to be branded anew upon purchase.
Any person who buys branded neat cattle from another, or acquires same by other lawful means, shall, within eight (8) months, brand the cattle with the person's own proper brand, in the presence of two (2) credible witnesses, a certificate of which shall be signed by the witnesses.
Code 1858, § 1659 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 7); Shan., § 2845; mod. Code 1932, § 5072; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1206.
Compiler's Notes. As to cattle, this section may be affected by part 2 of this chapter.
44-7-107. Altering or defacing marks — Forfeiture.
Any person who alters or defaces the mark or brand of another, forfeits for each animal on which the mark or brand is altered or defaced, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) to the owner who sues therefor in six (6) months, and to the owner or any interested third person who sues after six (6) and within twelve (12) months.
Code 1858, § 1660 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 2); Shan., § 2846; mod. Code 1932, § 5073; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1207.
Compiler's Notes. As to cattle, this section may be affected by § 44-7-208.
44-7-108. Misbranding or mismarking — Forfeiture.
Any person who misbrands or mismarks any unbranded or unmarked animals not belonging to that person forfeits, as in § 44-7-107, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) over and above the value of the animal, to be recovered in the same way.
Code 1858, § 1661 (deriv. Acts 1741, ch. 8, § 2); Shan., § 2847; Code 1932, § 5074; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1208.
Compiler's Notes. As to cattle, this section may be affected by § 44-7-208.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 36.
44-7-109. Inspection of record — Clerk's fee for recording.
The county clerk shall allow all citizens of the county to inspect, without charge, the book in which the marks and brands are recorded; and is entitled to fifty cents (50¢) for each record of a mark or brand.
Code 1858, § 1662; Shan., § 2848; Code 1932, § 5075; impl. am. Acts 1951, ch. 166, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1209.
Cross-References. Fee for recording and indexing mark or brand, § 8-21-701.
44-7-110. Record of livestock brands required.
- Every stockyard, slaughterhouse, and packing house licensed to do business under the laws of this state shall maintain for sixty (60) days on file a record of all visible brands on livestock handled or processed on their premises. The list shall be updated every sixty (60) days and inspection shall be made available to persons doing business with those establishments.
- In the event brands are unreadable, the stockyard, slaughterhouse, or packing house will record the brand to the best of its ability with a statement declaring the condition of the brand.
- Failure to comply with this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1971, ch. 147, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1219.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Part 2
Registration of Cattle Brands
44-7-201. Part definitions.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Brand” means any recorded identification mark applied to any position on the hide of a live animal by means of heat, acid or chemical, except tattoo marks in the ear or numbers used to keep production records or record of age;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
- “Department” means the department of agriculture;
- “Livestock hide dealer” means any dealer or person who buys hides;
- “Livestock market” means a place where a person assembles livestock for public sale if the person is required to procure a license or permit from the department to operate such market; and
- “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation or association.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1210.
Cross-References. Brands and trade-marks of timber, § 43-28-311.
Annual license fee for distributors of commercial fertilizers, § 43-11-104.
Registration of products, registered brands, § 43-8-104.
44-7-202. Registration of brands by department of agriculture — Fees — Issuance of certificate.
- Any owner who uses a brand to identify cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals belonging to that owner must submit an application to the department to register the owner's brand.
- The application shall be made on forms prescribed and furnished by the department and shall be accompanied by payment of a fee set by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703 and a facsimile of the brand to be registered. If the brand described in the application closely resembles another brand previously registered by another owner, the commissioner may reject the application for registration, but in the event the brand does not closely resemble another brand previously registered, the commissioner shall issue to the applicant a certificate of registration.
- A person having a brand duly registered with the department may transfer the brand to another person by notifying the department of the transfer and giving the date of transfer and the name of the transferee. Upon receipt of the notice, the department shall note the brand transfer and the name of the transferee in its register of brands. The transferee shall not use the transferred brand until the department notifies the transferee that the brand transfer has been noted on the department's register.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 2; 1970, ch. 374, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1211; Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 18.
Compiler's Note. The 2015 amendment rewrote the section, which read: “(a) Any owner who uses a brand to identify cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals belonging to that owner must register the owner's brand by applying to the department for registration.“(b) The application shall be made on forms prescribed and furnished by the department and shall be accompanied by a fee of ten dollars ($10.00), and a facsimile of the brand to be registered shall also accompany the application.“(c) All fees collected under this part for registration, transfer, and reregistration of brands shall be credited to the department and kept in a separate account for the purpose of defraying the cost of administering this part.“(d) If the brand described in the application closely resembles another registered brand previously registered by another owner, the commissioner may reject the application for registration, but in the event the brand does not closely resemble another brand previously registered, the commissioner shall issue to the applicant a certificate of registration.“(e) In the event the department denies registration of a brand, for any reason, the registration fee of ten dollars ($10.00) shall be returned to the applicant.“(f) A person having a brand duly registered with the department may transfer the brand to another by notifying the department of the transfer and giving the date of transfer and the name of the transferee. Upon receipt of the notice, and a transfer fee of one dollar ($1.00), the transfer of the registration shall be noted in the register of brands showing that the brand has been transferred and giving the name of the transferee. The transferred brand shall not be used by the new owner until the department notifies the transferee that the transfer has been noted on its register.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
Cross-References. Record keeping and reporting of livestock brands required by stockyards, slaughterhouses and packing houses, § 44-7-110.
44-7-203. Copy of certificate evidence of registration.
In all suits at law or in equity, or in any criminal proceedings involving the title or right of possession of branded cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals, a copy of the certificate of the brand registration, verified by the affidavit of the commissioner, shall be received in evidence by the court as evidence of the registration of the brand in accordance with the requirements of this part.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 3; 1970, ch. 374, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1212.
44-7-204. Reregistration of brands periodically — Fee — Forfeiture upon failure.
Every five (5) years, all brands shall be reregistered with the department. At least ninety (90) days prior to the date for reregistration of all brands, the department shall notify all persons having brands registered as to the date by which the brand must be reregistered. On or before the reregistration date, the person in whose name the brand is registered shall furnish any additional information as the department may require on forms furnished by the department. If any person having a registered brand fails to reregister the brand in that person's name, the brand shall be forfeited and shall be available for registration in the name of another person.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 4; T.C.A., § 44-1213; Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 19.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment , in the third sentence, deleted “pay to the department a reregistration fee of two dollars ($2.00), and shall” preceding “furnish” and substituted “any additional” for “such additional”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
44-7-205. Register of brands — Publication.
The department shall maintain a complete register of all brands, showing the name and address of the owner, and shall, in accordance with the rules, regulations, policies and procedures of the state publications committee, publish and distribute copies of the register in booklet form, and supplemental copies thereof, to every livestock market and county clerk in the state. Copies of the register of brands may be furnished to other persons requesting them at a price to be determined by the commissioner.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 5; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A., § 44-1214; Acts 1990, ch. 1024, § 20.
44-7-206. Copies of register to be available for inspection.
Every operator of a livestock market where cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals are sold shall keep a copy of the register of brands in that person's place of business where it will be accessible for public inspection.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 6; 1970, ch. 374, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1215.
44-7-207. Rules and regulations promulgated by commissioner.
The commissioner has the authority to promulgate such rules and regulations as are reasonably necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this part so as to facilitate the tracing and identification of cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals, and afford protection against stealing and unlawful dealing in cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 7; 1970, ch. 374, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1216.
44-7-208. Unlawful to use unregistered brand or deface brand.
It is unlawful for:
- Any person to use any brand for branding cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, horses, and other animals, unless the brand is registered with the department;
- Any person to obliterate, alter or deface the brand of any animals; or
- Any person operating or owning a livestock market to fail to keep a copy of the register of brands furnished to such person by the department in a place easily accessible to interested parties.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 8; 1970, ch. 374, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1217.
44-7-209. Violation of this part a misdemeanor.
A person who violates any of the provisions of this part commits a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1959, ch. 311, § 9; T.C.A., § 44-1218; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Part 3
Registration of Stallions
44-7-301. Pedigreed jacks or bulls for breeding to be registered.
The pedigree of any jack or bull, claimed to be pedigreed livestock and used for public breeding, shall be filed and registered with the county clerk, under oath that the pedigree is genuine, and the county clerk shall record the pedigree in a well-bound book to be kept in county clerk's office for that purpose.
Acts 1891, ch. 148, § 1; Shan., § 2854; Code 1932, § 5088; impl. am. Acts 1947, ch. 75; C. Supp. 1950, § 5088; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A., (orig. ed.), § 44-1301; Acts 2008, ch. 924, § 2.
Amendments. The 2008 amendment deleted “, and the county clerk shall be allowed the sum of fifty cents (50¢) as fee for filing, recording, and making three (3) certified copies of the pedigree” from the end.
Effective Dates. Acts 2008, ch. 924, § 17. July 1, 2008.
Cross-References. Brands and trade-marks of timber, § 43-28-311.
Exotic animals, title 70, ch. 4, part 4.
Annual license fee for distributors of commercial fertilizers, § 43-11-104.
Registration of products, registered brands, § 43-8-104.
Collateral References.
Breeding of animals, constitutionality of statute designed to regulate, in order to improve, or prevent deterioration of, stock. 116 A.L.R. 1315.
44-7-302. Pedigrees to be posted.
The owner of such pedigreed stock shall, during breeding seasons, have posted conspicuously in three (3) different places in the county in which the owner lives, or in which the animal is being used for breeding purposes, a certified copy of the pedigree recorded as provided in § 44-7-301.
Acts 1891, ch. 148, § 2; Shan., § 2855; Code 1932, § 5089; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1302.
44-7-303. False pedigree posted or recorded a misdemeanor.
Any person who knowingly records or posts any false or fraudulent pedigree commits a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1891, ch. 148, § 3; Shan., § 2856; Code 1932, § 5090; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1303; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Part 4
Certification of Livestock
44-7-401. Certification of quality — Fees — Rules and regulations.
In order to promote and further develop livestock interests of this state, the commissioner, or the commissioner's authorized agents, is authorized, when requested by parties financially interested in livestock or livestock products, to investigate and certify the quality, condition, grade or other classification of the livestock or livestock products. Such classification, including payment of such fees as the commissioner deems reasonable for the services rendered or performed by employees or licensed agents of the department, shall be established under such rules and regulations as the commissioner may prescribe.
Acts 1971, ch. 172, § 1; T.C.A., §§ 44-2501, 44-13-101.
Cross-References. Brands and trade-marks of timber, § 43-28-311.
Annual license fee for distributors of commercial fertilizers, § 43-11-104.
Registration of products, registered brands, § 43-8-104.
44-7-402. Disposition of collected fees.
All fees and moneys collected or received under § 44-7-401 shall be paid into the state treasury to the credit of the department, with the funds to be used solely and separately to defray the actual costs of the services rendered.
Acts 1971, ch. 172, § 1; T.C.A., §§ 44-2502, 44-13-102.
44-7-403. Animal diagnostic laboratory — Fees.
- Animal diagnostic laboratory service fees, including, but not limited to, biopsy, necropsy, cytology, parasitology, virology, bacteriology, toxicology, and immunology, shall be set by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703.
- The commissioner shall establish grading fees for livestock graded by employees or agents of the department of agriculture by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703. The livestock market where the animal was graded and sold shall be responsible for payment of the fees to the department.
Acts 1983, ch. 153, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-13-103; Acts 1996, ch. 792, § 1; 2002, ch. 640, § 17; 2010, ch. 717, § 19; 2015, ch. 485, § 20.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment inserted “who belong to Tennessee residents,” in the first sentence of (a).
The 2015 amendment rewrote the section, which read: “(a) The commissioner is authorized to charge fees for services provided by the animal diagnostic laboratory pursuant to regulations promulgated by the commissioner; however, no fee will be charged for tests performed on livestock who belong to Tennessee residents, except for serologic testing for equine infectious anemia. For purposes of this part, “livestock” means all equine as well as animals that are being raised primarily for use as food or fiber for human utilization or consumption including, but not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, goats and poultry.“(b) A grading fee of six cents (6cent(s)) per head shall be charged by the commissioner for feeder pigs and market hogs graded by employees or agents of the department. A minimum charge of thirty-seven dollars and fifty cents ($37.50) per day of sale shall be charged. The livestock market where the animal was graded and sold will be responsible for payment of the fees to the department.“(c) A grading fee of twenty-five cents (25cent(s)) per head will be charged by the commissioner for feeder calves graded by employees or agents of the department. A minimum charge of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day of sale shall be charged. The livestock market where the animal was graded and sold will be responsible for payment of the fees to the department.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
Chapter 8
Fences and Confinement
Part 1
General Provisions
44-8-101. Land in cultivation sufficiently fenced.
Every planter shall make and keep a sufficient fence, of ordinarily sound and substantial material, around the planter's land in cultivation, and so close, for at least two and one-half feet (2½') from the surface of the earth, as to prevent hogs large enough to do damage from passing through the fence.
Code 1858, § 1682 (deriv. Acts 1807, ch. 8, § 1); Acts 1877, ch. 35, §§ 2, 3; Shan., § 2979; Code 1932, § 5202; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1701, 44-9-101.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Cross-References. Cattle guards, title 65, ch. 6, part 3.
Equine activities, liability, title 44, ch. 20.
Vandalism, § 39-14-408.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 9; 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, § 1.
Law Reviews.
Animal Lex, 25 Tenn. L. Rev. 471.
Comparative Legislation. Fences and enclosures:
Ala. Code § 3-4-1 et seq.
Ark. Code § 2-39-101 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 256.010 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 69-13-201 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 272.010 et seq.
Va. Code § 55-298.1 et seq.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Constitutionality.
This section is not arbitrary or capricious in its provisions, but based on sound policy. Peterson v. State, 104 Tenn. 127, 56 S.W. 834, 1899 Tenn. LEXIS 21 (1899).
2. Construction and Interpretation.
Although not specifically repealed with the passage of § 44-8-401 the mischievous livestock statutes, §§ 44-8-109 — 44-8-111, are essentially impossible to reconcile with legislative policy of contemporary law. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
3. Application.
The provision defining a lawful fence as to hogs applies to farms or plantations used in the country for agricultural purposes, and has no application to lots in incorporated towns and cities. Staub v. Fantz, 58 Tenn. 766, 1872 Tenn. LEXIS 332 (1872).
Rights-of-way of railroads are not within the scope of this provision. Ward v. Paducah & M.R.R., 4 F. 862, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2304 (C.C.W.D. Tenn. 1880).
4. Evidence.
Seven incidences of cattle escaping during four-year period was not showing cattle were “notoriously mischievous” either as a circumstance under § 44-8-401 or as an independent ground under this section. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
5. Special Acts.
Special acts relating to a particular county by population reference and prohibiting animals running at large repealed this section by implication with reference to that county. Folkner v. Whithurst, 144 Tenn. 62, 229 S.W. 146, 1920 Tenn. LEXIS 63 (1921).
6. Liability of Owner of Animals.
An owner of animals is not liable for damages caused to the crop of another by his animals, if they are not running at large by reason of his fault or negligence, where they escaped from a pasture enclosed with a lawful fence, or by an ordinary fence such as generally required to restrain that kind of stock. Wilson v. White, 20 Tenn. App. 604, 102 S.W.2d 531, 1936 Tenn. App. LEXIS 52 (Tenn. Nov. 7, 1936).
Where declaration was bottomed not only on negligence of defendant in permitting bull to escape but also on negligence in not securing animal after knowledge that it had escaped, recovery could be had even though owner of animal had complied with fencing requirements. Groce Provision Co. v. Dortch, 49 Tenn. App. 57, 350 S.W.2d 409, 1961 Tenn. App. LEXIS 96 (1961).
7. Finding as to Lawfulness of Fences.
In action against the owner of domestic animals to recover damage done to plaintiff's garden by defendant's stock, which escaped from defendant's pasture, where the court did not expressly find that defendant's fences were lawful fences, but did find that “the fences enclosing the stock were all in good condition and proper repair,” it could be assumed that defendant's fences were lawful. Wilson v. White, 20 Tenn. App. 604, 102 S.W.2d 531, 1936 Tenn. App. LEXIS 52 (Tenn. Nov. 7, 1936).
8. Duty Under Partition Fence Statute.
Where the obligation to maintain a fence is the mutual responsibility of each party, a party finding livestock upon his property is obligated to make the necessary repairs. The parties, by neglecting their duties to maintain the fence, cannot recover for their losses. Wills v. Potter, 730 S.W.2d 327, 1987 Tenn. App. LEXIS 2463 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
Collateral References. 4 Am. Jur. 2d Animals §§ 49, 50, 52; 35 Am. Jur. 2d Fences §§ 1-5.
3A C.J.S. Animals §§ 140, 246, 247; 36A C.J.S. Fences §§ 3, 4.
Constitutionality of fencing and stock laws. 6 A.L.R. 212, 18 A.L.R. 67.
Fence as factor in fixing boundary line — modern cases. 7 A.L.R.4th 53.
Interurban railroad's liability for killing or injuring livestock running at large as affected by failure to fence right-of-way. 2 A.L.R. 101, 25 A.L.R. 1506.
Regulations prohibiting or limiting fences, hedges, or walls. 1 A.L.R.4th 373.
Fences 19.
44-8-102. Various materials constituting sufficient fencing — Rules.
-
The following types of fence are deemed sufficient:
- Stone. A substantial stone fence or wall, three and one-half feet (3½') high;
- Plank and post and rail. A post and plank or post and rail fence four feet (4') high;
- Rail. A common worm or crooked rail fence five feet (5') high;
- Bank. Every bank or other means used as a fence, or part of a fence, equivalent, as an obstruction to stock, to either of the three (3) classes of fence above named;
- Planks and wire. Any enclosure made by nailing fast two (2) sound planks, each not less than six inches (6") wide, to posts set firmly in the ground not more than eight feet (8') apart, the bottom plank to be not more than three inches (3") from the ground, and the second plank from the ground not more than four inches (4") from the first; and then by stretching not less than four (4) strands of barbed wire tightly between the posts above the planks, the topmost wire to be not less than four and one-half feet (4½') from the ground, and the bottom wire to be four inches (4") from the topmost plank; the next wire from the bottom one to be nine inches (9") from the topmost plank, and the third wire from the bottom to be twenty-one inches (21") from the topmost plank, the above distance as nearly as practicable;
- Osage orange. Bois d' arc or Osage orange fences, wholly of bois d' arc or Osage orange, or in part of bois d' arc or Osage orange, and in part of wire or other material, at least four feet (4') high, and at least eighteen inches (18") across the top and sufficiently close to prevent stock of all kinds from passing through; and
- Wire. Any enclosure made by nine (9) smooth, horizontal wires, the bottom and top or first and ninth of which are to be standard number nine (9), and the other seven (7) standard number eleven (11) wires; the first wire to be placed upon or very near the ground; the second three and one-half inches (3½") from the first; the third three and one-half inches (3½") from the second; the fourth four inches (4") from the third; the fifth four inches (4") from the fourth; the sixth six inches (6") from the fifth; the seventh eight inches (8") from the sixth; the eighth ten inches (10") from the seventh; the ninth ten inches (10") from the eighth. The vertical stays or pickets are to be two feet (2') apart between the first or ground wire and the fifth, and from the fifth to the top or ninth wire four feet (4') apart. The posts are to be one (1) rod apart and well stayed at the ends of the fence, so as to keep the fence from sagging.
-
In addition to subsection (a), sufficient fencing shall include:
- A fence constructed from synthetic materials commonly sold for fencing, if such materials are installed pursuant to generally acceptable standards, to confine or restrict the movement of farm animals; and
- Systems or devices based on technology generally accepted as appropriate for the confinement or restriction of farm animals.
- The commissioner of agriculture may adopt rules and regulations regarding sufficient fencing consistent with this part to provide greater specificity as to the requirements of sufficient fencing. The absence of any such rule or regulation shall not affect the validity or applicability of this section or any section of this part as such sections relate to what constitutes sufficient fencing.
Code 1858, § 1682; Acts 1877, ch. 35, §§ 2, 3; 1883, ch. 46, § 2; 1899, ch. 332, § 1; Shan., § 2980; mod. Code 1932, § 5203; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1702, 44-9-102; Acts 1999, ch. 266, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Law Reviews.
Negligence — Animal Escaping From Slaughter House, 29 Tenn. L. Rev. 586.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Liability for Strays.
Where owner of cattle maintained a lawful fence and was not guilty of any negligence he was not liable for damage caused when animal strayed onto highway. Overbey v. Poteat, 206 Tenn. 146, 332 S.W.2d 197, 1960 Tenn. LEXIS 354 (1960).
44-8-103. Horses, cattle, and mules sufficiently fenced.
The following shall be sufficient and be deemed a lawful fence only as to horses, cattle, and mules: any enclosure made by stretching not less than five (5) strands of barbed wire tightly between posts firmly set in the ground, or between growing trees and posts firmly set in the ground, not more than twenty feet (20') apart; the topmost wire not less than four and one-half feet (4½') from the ground, the bottom wire not less than six inches (6"), and the next to the bottom wire not less than fifteen inches (15") from the ground.
Acts 1883, ch. 46, § 1; Shan., § 2981; Code 1932, § 5204; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1703, 44-9-103.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, § 1.
Cited: Higgins v. Vinson, 549 S.W.2d 161, 1976 Tenn. App. LEXIS 255 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1976).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Construction.
Sections 44-8-103 — 44-8-105 were not intended solely for protection of landowners who fenced their property in accordance therewith and to give landowners a remedy if such lawfully-fenced property was damaged, but also to prevent domestic animals from straying on account of negligence or willful conduct of owner. Rodgers v. Webb, 335 F. Supp. 584, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10185 (E.D. Tenn. 1971).
2. Negligence.
In suit by automobile owner against horse owner for damages resulting from collision between auto and horse, any evidence of horse owner's violation of prescribing lawful fence for horses and cattle does not constitute negligence per se. Rodgers v. Webb, 335 F. Supp. 584, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10185 (E.D. Tenn. 1971).
3. Fence Maintenance Agreement — Effect of Breach.
Where the obligation to maintain a fence is the mutual responsibility of each party, a party finding livestock upon his property is obligated to make the necessary repairs. The parties, by neglecting their duties to maintain the fence, cannot recover for their losses. Wills v. Potter, 730 S.W.2d 327, 1987 Tenn. App. LEXIS 2463 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
Collateral References.
Keeping horses as nuisance. 27 A.L.R.3d 627.
44-8-104. Paling and wire fence lawful.
The paling and wire fence is made a lawful fence; provided, that the fence is built upon good-sized, substantial posts, set firmly in the ground, not more than twelve feet (12') apart; and provided further, that there is firmly fastened upon these posts two (2) sets double-strand wire, one (1) near the top, the other near the bottom, into which there is woven substantial sawed or split palings, not less than three feet (3') long, with one (1) barbed wire one foot (1') above the paling, or four feet (4') without the wire, and not more than three inches (3") apart; but nothing in this section shall be construed as repealing any statute providing for lawful fences in this state.
Acts 1899, ch. 374, §§ 1, 2; Shan., § 2981a1; Code 1932, § 5205; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1704, 44-9-104.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
44-8-105. Three-wire, plank, or slat fence a lawful fence.
In addition, the following shall also be a lawful fence: a fence built on good-sized, substantial posts, set firmly in the ground not more than nine feet (9') apart. The fence shall consist of three (3) barbed wires, or three (3) planks, or three (3) slats running horizontally and fastened firmly to the posts, the first to be eighteen inches (18") from the ground, and the second and third eighteen inches (18") from the first and second respectively, counting from the center of each. The fence may consist entirely of wire strands, or of planks or of slats; or it may be composed of a wire, plank, and slat.
Acts 1891, ch. 92, § 1; Shan., § 2982; Code 1932, § 5206; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1705, 44-9-105.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
44-8-106. Damages for trespass — Determination — Recovery.
- When any trespass has been committed by horses, cattle, hogs, goats, sheep, or other stock upon the cleared and cultivated ground of any person having the livestock fenced, as is described in §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-105, the person may complain to a judge of the court of general sessions of the county, who shall cause two (2) discreet and impartial freeholders to be summoned, and with them shall view and examine, on oath of the freeholders to do justice, whether the complainant's fence is a lawful fence, and what damage, if any, the person has sustained by the trespass, and certify the result of this view and examination under the hands and seals of the judge and freeholders, which certificate the judge shall deliver to the complainant. The certificate shall be prima facie evidence of the plaintiff's demand.
- The owner of the stock shall be entitled to a hearing, but, if not successful, shall make full satisfaction for the trespass and damages to the party injured, to be recovered as the damages and costs, subject to the right of appeal of either party. To secure the payment of any judgment, execution may be levied upon the stock committing the trespass; and after ten (10) days' notice the stock may be sold to satisfy the judgment so recovered.
Acts 1897, ch. 91, § 1; Shan., § 2982a1; mod. Code 1932, § 5207; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1706; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-9-106.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 9.
Law Reviews.
Animals — Liability of Owner for Trespasses, 15 Tenn. L. Rev. 241.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
Decisions Under Prior Law
1. Certificate as Evidence.
The certificate was prima facie evidence that plaintiff's fence was lawful and that damage sustained was equivalent to the amount certified, but it was not evidence that a trespass was committed, which must be established by other testimony. Shaver v. Catrin, 2 Tenn. 323, 1814 Tenn. LEXIS 27 (1814).
2. Amount Stated in Certificate — Effect.
Plaintiff must sue in court having jurisdiction of amount stated in certificate. Shaver v. Catrin, 2 Tenn. 323, 1814 Tenn. LEXIS 27 (1814).
Plaintiff could sue for amount stated in certificate in justice court (now court of general sessions) if amount did not exceed jurisdiction of justice (now judge) but could not recover in excess of amount stated in certificate. Shaver v. Catrin, 2 Tenn. 323, 1814 Tenn. LEXIS 27 (1814).
Collateral References.
Liability for personal injury or death caused by trespassing or intruding livestock. 49 A.L.R.4th 710.
44-8-107. Defense of insufficiency of fence.
If it appears that the fence is insufficient, the owner of the animals shall not be liable to make satisfaction for the damages.
Code 1858, § 1685 (deriv. Acts 1807, ch. 8, § 2); Shan., § 2986; Code 1932, § 5208; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1707, 44-9-107.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Law Reviews.
Animals — Liability of Owner for Trespasses, 15 Tenn. L. Rev. 241.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Sufficiency of Fence.
Every part of an enclosing fence must be lawful throughout to authorize the recovery of damages committed by trespassing stock that is not notoriously mischievous. If the fence is insufficient at any point where such stock might have broken over, the owner of the stock is not responsible for the damages, although the fence was insufficient where the stock broke over. Smith v. Jones, 95 Tenn. 339, 32 S.W. 200, 1895 Tenn. LEXIS 95 (1895); Mobile & O.R.R. v. Tiernan, 102 Tenn. 704, 52 S.W. 179 (1899).
To render a fence legally sufficient, the gates forming parts of it must be legally sufficient. The owner must exercise ordinary care to keep the fence and gates in good repair and closed at all points. Mobile & O.R.R. v. Tiernan, 102 Tenn. 704, 52 S.W. 179 (1899).
2. Stock Escaping Through Defective Fence.
Hogs in field of owner, escaping through a defective partition fence into the field of adjoining landowner whose duty it was to keep same in repair, were not running at large. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
44-8-108. Injury to animals.
If any person, whose fence is adjudged insufficient, maims, wounds, or kills any such animal, or causes or procures it to be done, that person shall make full satisfaction to the person injured for all damages sustained, to be recovered before any tribunal having cognizance thereof.
Code 1858, § 1686 (deriv. Acts 1807, ch. 8, § 3); Shan., § 2987; Code 1932, § 5209; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1708, 44-9-108.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, §§ 30, 31; 13 Tenn. Juris., Game and Game Laws, § 3.
44-8-109. Notoriously mischievous stock to be confined.
All persons owning notoriously mischievous stock, known to be in the habit of throwing down or jumping fences, shall be required to keep the stock confined upon their own premises.
Acts 1875, ch. 110, § 1; Shan., § 2988; Code 1932, § 5210; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1709, 44-9-109.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 9.
Law Reviews.
Animals — Liability of Owner for Trespasses, 15 Tenn. L. Rev. 241.
Cited: McElroy v. Carter, — S.W.3d —, 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 635 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 29, 2006).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Killing Mischievous Animal.
Owner of mischievous sow could not recover value of sow against neighbor who killed sow after repeatedly warning owner to keep the sow enclosed. Herrod v. Robbins, 1 Tenn. Civ. App. (1 Higgins) 170 (1910).
Collateral References.
Scienter as condition of liability for damage by trespassing animals other than dogs. 33 A.L.R. 1305.
Statutes eliminating scienter as condition of liability. 1 A.L.R. 1113, 142 A.L.R. 436.
44-8-110. Liability of owners of notoriously mischievous stock.
The owners of notoriously mischievous stock shall be liable for all damages done by the stock to enclosure or crops of others.
Acts 1875, ch. 110, § 2; Shan., § 2989; mod. Code 1932, § 5211; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1710, 44-9-110.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Construction and Interpretation.
Although not specifically repealed with the passage of § 44-8-401 the mischievous livestock statutes, §§ 44-8-109 — 44-8-111, are essentially impossible to reconcile with legislative policy of contemporary law. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
2. Liability in Absence of Legally Sufficient Fence.
The statute was intended to operate as an exception to the general rule that the fence and every part thereof should be of the character and description required by law to constitute a lawful fence. The owner of notoriously mischievous stock shall be liable for all damages done by the same to the enclosures or crops of others, though the fence enclosing the same may not be a lawful fence. Smith v. Jones, 95 Tenn. 339, 32 S.W. 200, 1895 Tenn. LEXIS 95 (1895).
44-8-111. Stock liable to execution.
- To secure the payment of such damage and costs, executions may be levied upon the stock committing the trespass.
- After ten (10) days' notice, the stock may be sold to pay such amount of damages and costs.
Acts 1875, ch. 110, § 3; Shan., § 2990; Code 1932, § 5212; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1711, 44-9-111.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 5.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Construction and Interpretation.
Although not specifically repealed with the passage of § 44-8-401 the mischievous livestock statutes, §§ 44-8-109 — 44-8-111, are essentially impossible to reconcile with legislative policy of contemporary law. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
44-8-112. Pulling and leaving down fence, or opening and leaving open gate, a misdemeanor.
Any person who pulls down the fence of another and leaves the same down, without permission of the owner, or opens and leaves open the gate of another, without permission of the owner, commits a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1875, ch. 71, § 1; Shan., § 3006; mod. Code 1932, § 5227; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1726, 44-9-112; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-8-101 — 44-8-112, concerning running at large, was transferred to part 4 of this chapter in 1987.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Cited: Wilson v. White, 20 Tenn. App. 604, 102 S.W.2d 531, 1936 Tenn. App. LEXIS 52 (Tenn. Nov. 7, 1936).
44-8-113. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-113 (Code 1858, § 1698 (deriv. Acts 1825, ch. 35, § 3); Shan., § 3013; Code 1932, § 5232; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-201, 44-9-113), concerning cotton gins to be enclosed and forfeiture for violation, was repealed by 1999 Acts, ch. 266, § 3.
44-8-114. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-114 (Code 1858, § 1699 (deriv. Acts 1797, ch. 46, §§ 1, 2; 1822, ch. 32, §§ 1, 2); Shan., § 3014; Code 1932, § 5233; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-202, 44-9-114), concerning saltpeter and saltworks to be enclosed and forfeiture for violation, was repealed by 1999 Acts, ch. 266, § 4.
Part 2
Partition Fences
44-8-201. Partition fence defined — Joining fences.
Partition fences, within the meaning of this part, are fences erected on the line between lands owned by different persons; but no owner of land is compelled to allow a neighbor to join a fence exclusively on that person's own land.
Code 1858, § 1691; Shan., § 2998; Code 1932, § 5213; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1712, 44-9-201.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 2, §§ 44-8-201 — 44-8-203, concerning grazing, was transferred to part 5 of this chapter in 1987.
Cross-References. Cattle guards, title 65, ch. 6, part 3.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 1 Tenn. Juris., Actions, § 2; 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 31; 2 Tenn. Juris., Appeal and Error, § 30; 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, §§ 2, 22.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Nature and Application of Statutes.
The statutes regulating partition fences apply to farms in the country, and not to lots in towns and cities. Lightfoot v. Grove, 52 Tenn. 473, 1871 Tenn. LEXIS 281 (1871).
The statutes are compulsory on adjoining landowners, where, as the provisions in relation to crops imply, the lands are cultivated. The fence in such case is equally beneficial to both parties, and the statutes require that they contribute equally to the expense of constructing and maintaining it. Neither has the right to remove such fence, or to allow his part of it to be out of repair, when there is an agreement that each shall keep a certain part of the fence in good repair. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
Fence posts were placed on the land by both the plaintiff landowner's and the defendant landowners' predecessors in interest in their attempt to comply with a court order in a previous lawsuit; therefore, plaintiff should be responsible for a portion of the cost of relocating the fence posts. Based on testimony that the land was being used as a farm, it appeared that T.C.A. §§ 44-8-201 and 44-8-202 applied. Polos v. Shields, — S.W.3d —, 2009 Tenn. App. LEXIS 625 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2009), appeal denied, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 108 (Tenn. Feb. 22, 2010).
2. Duty Under Partition Fence Statutes.
The provisions of this and the following sections relating to partition fences are compulsory on adjoining owners of cultivated land, and one who omits his duty in that regard is liable for damages if his stock breaks over into his neighbor's land and destroys his crop. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
Where the obligation to maintain a fence is the mutual responsibility of each party, a party finding livestock upon his property is obligated to make the necessary repairs. The parties, by neglecting their duties to maintain the fence, cannot recover for their losses. Wills v. Potter, 730 S.W.2d 327, 1987 Tenn. App. LEXIS 2463 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
3. Fences Constituting Partition Fences.
Where the landowners on each side close a dividing lane between their lands, in pursuance of their agreement, by each removing his half of the fence at opposite ends and joining the parts left at the middle and at each end, with the agreement that such fence should be a partition fence between their lands, the law regulating partition fences is applicable. Stallcup v. Bradly, 43 Tenn. 406, 1866 Tenn. LEXIS 69 (1866).
Where a boundary is disputed and the fence is not on the true line it may be deemed a partition fence and the statutory law applied. Porter v. Poole, 8 Tenn. App. 453, 1928 Tenn. App. LEXIS 161 (1928).
Collateral References.
Constitutionality of laws relating to division or line fence. 6 A.L.R. 213, 18 A.L.R. 67.
Injunction to restrain repeated or continuing trespass by interference with fences. 32 A.L.R. 522, 60 A.L.R.2d 310.
Interlocutory mandatory injunction in connection with line fence contest to compel surrender of possession. 32 A.L.R. 916, 15 A.L.R.2d 213.
Jurisdiction of justice of the peace (or similar court) of actions relating to division fences. 115 A.L.R. 524.
Removal or rebuilding, rights as to. 8 A.L.R. 1644.
44-8-202. Fences to be erected and maintained at joint expense.
Partition fences may be erected and repaired at the expense, jointly, of the occupants or owners; or if a person makes a fence a partition fence, by joining to it or using it as such, that person shall pay to the person erecting it that person's proportion of the expense.
Code 1858, § 1687; Acts 1875, ch. 64, § 1; Shan., § 2999; Code 1932, § 5214; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1713, 44-9-202.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 2, §§ 44-8-201 — 44-8-203, concerning grazing, was transferred to part 5 of this chapter in 1987.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, § 2.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Agreement to Maintain — Avoidance.
A contract to keep in repair a certain portion of a partition fence cannot be annulled or avoided by verbal notice without assent of the other party, nor can the fence be removed under such circumstances. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
2. Nature And Application of Statutes.
Fence posts were placed on the land by both the plaintiff landowner's and the defendant landowners' predecessors in interest in their attempt to comply with a court order in a previous lawsuit; therefore, plaintiff should be responsible for a portion of the cost of relocating the fence posts. Based on testimony that the land was being used as a farm, it appeared that T.C.A. §§ 44-8-201 and 44-8-202 applied. Polos v. Shields, — S.W.3d —, 2009 Tenn. App. LEXIS 625 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2009), appeal denied, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 108 (Tenn. Feb. 22, 2010).
Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted with regard to the partition fence because plaintiff failed to introduce into evidence any support for her claim regarding what she referred to as a partition fence; plaintiff testified that there was a fence on the boundary line between her property and defendants' property that was in need of repair and/or replacement, but she did not establish how the fence came to be where it was, much less that defendants were liable for its repair or replacement. Rogers v. Roach, — S.W.3d —, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 402 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 19, 2012).
44-8-203. Damages for failure to maintain fence.
If either of the persons having a joint or partition fence refuses or neglects to keep that person's part of the fence in good repair, that person shall be liable for all damages the other may sustain to enclosures or crops, by trespassing stock, in consequence of the refusal or neglect.
Acts 1875, ch. 64, § 1; Shan., § 3000; Code 1932, § 5215; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1714, 44-9-203.
Compiler's Notes. Former part 2, §§ 44-8-201 — 44-8-203, concerning grazing, was transferred to part 5 of this chapter in 1987.
Cited: Porter v. Poole, 8 Tenn. App. 453, 1928 Tenn. App. LEXIS 161 (1928).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Fence Maintenance Agreement — Effect of Breach.
A partition fence upon the line between adjoining landowners may be erected and kept in repair at their joint expense; and when the fence is constructed, they may agree that each shall keep a particular part thereof in repair, and the one failing to discharge this duty is liable to the other for all damages that may result from such failure. Where one fails to discharge this duty, and, in consequence, damages result to him, on account of the injuries done to his crops by the other's hogs that passed through that part of the fence that he failed to keep in repair according to the agreement, he cannot recover the damages, because he cannot complain of an injury that was the direct result of his own wrong. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
Where the obligation to maintain a fence is the mutual responsibility of each party, a party finding livestock upon his property is obligated to make the necessary repairs. The parties, by neglecting their duties to maintain the fence, cannot recover for their losses. Wills v. Potter, 730 S.W.2d 327, 1987 Tenn. App. LEXIS 2463 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
2. Abrogating Obligation.
The obligation cannot be avoided or annulled by notice given by one to the other without the assent of the other, nor can the fence be removed under such circumstances. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
44-8-204. Pay for fence.
If the parties cannot agree as to the amount to be paid to the owner erecting or repairing a partition fence as provided in §§ 44-8-202 and 44-8-206, on application by either to a judge of the court of general sessions, the judge shall issue an order to three (3) disinterested freeholders, not related to either of the parties, to examine such fence, and to ascertain the amount to be paid to the owner erecting or repairing it.
Code 1858, § 1688; Shan., § 3002; mod. Code 1932, § 5221; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1720; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-9-204.
44-8-205. Judgment and execution.
The freeholders, first taking an oath before the judge to discharge their duty fairly and impartially, on a day to be by them appointed, of which both parties shall have notice, shall examine the fence, and report to the judge, in writing, the amount to be paid the person erecting it; whereupon, unless the money be paid within ten (10) days thereafter, the judge shall enter up judgment, subject to appeal, and issue execution for the judgment.
Code 1858, § 1689; Shan., § 3003; mod. Code 1932, § 5222; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1721; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A. § 44-9-205.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Appeal from Justice's (Judge's) Judgment.
An appeal lies from the justice's (now judge's) judgment entered up for the amount to be paid for the erection of partition fences, as in other civil cases. Lightfoot v. Grove, 52 Tenn. 473, 1871 Tenn. LEXIS 281 (1871).
44-8-206. Rebuilding or repairing fences.
The like proceedings may be had in cases where partition fences are rebuilt or repaired by either of the joint proprietors, the jury of view being judges, in the first instance, of the necessity or advisability of the improvement.
Code 1858, § 1690; Shan., § 3004; mod. Code 1932, § 5223; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1722, 44-9-206.
Cited: Rogers v. Roach, — S.W.3d —, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 402 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 19, 2012).
44-8-207. Fees of court and fence reviewers.
The court is entitled to fifty cents (50¢) for issuing the order, and the fence reviewers to one dollar ($1.00) each, one half (½) of which is to be paid by each party; and, if not paid within ten (10) days after the report, execution shall issue for such amount.
Code 1858, § 1692; Shan., § 3005; Code 1932, § 5224; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1723; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-9-207.
44-8-208. Fences not removed without six months' notice.
No partition fence, or any part of a partition fence, shall be removed without the mutual consent of the owners, unless the party desiring to remove the fence, or part of the fence, shall first give six (6) months' notice in writing to the other owner of the owner's intention to remove the fence. After the expiration of the time of the notice, the party may remove the fence, or part of the fence.
Acts 1897, ch. 95, § 1; Shan., § 3005a1; Code 1932, § 5225; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1724, 44-9-208.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, § 2.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Verbal Notice.
A contract to keep in repair a certain portion of a partition fence cannot be annulled or avoided by verbal notice without assent of the other party, nor can the fence be removed under such circumstances. Brown v. Sams, 119 Tenn. 677, 109 S.W. 513, 1907 Tenn. LEXIS 29 (1907).
2. Boundary in Dispute — Removal of Fence.
Where the boundary is in dispute, the fact that the fence was not on the line does not prevent its being a partition fence. The remover of such fence is liable for a conversion, if the removal is without mutual consent or on notice as provided. Porter v. Poole, 8 Tenn. App. 453, 1928 Tenn. App. LEXIS 161 (1928).
Decisions Under Prior Law
1. Sufficiency of Notice.
Notice of the intention to remove a partition fence, given to an executor who has no authority to sell the land, is not legal, because he has not such an interest in the land, as will make him the proper person, to whom the notice should be given. Stallcup v. Bradly, 43 Tenn. 406, 1866 Tenn. LEXIS 69 (1866).
2. Removal Without Notice.
If one of the owners removes the partition fence without giving the other reasonable notice of his intention to do so, he becomes a trespasser, and is liable to the injured party for the natural and proximate consequences of the trespass. Stallcup v. Bradly, 43 Tenn. 406, 1866 Tenn. LEXIS 69 (1866).
44-8-209. Removing fence without notice a misdemeanor — Damages.
Any person who removes a partition fence, or any part of a partition fence, without first giving the notice required by § 44-8-208, commits a Class C misdemeanor, and is also liable to the person injured for any damages sustained by reason of the removal.
Acts 1897, ch. 95, § 2; Shan., § 3005a2; mod. Code 1932, § 5226; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1725, 44-9-209; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-8-210. Disclaiming responsibility for fence erection — Definitions.
- In cases when the property on one (1) side of an existing or proposed partition fence is agricultural land, and the property on the other side is non-agricultural land, the owner of the non-agricultural land may disclaim any responsibility for the erection or maintenance of a partition fence pursuant to § 44-8-202. Such disclaimer shall be in writing, executed by the non-agricultural land owner and mailed to the owner of the agricultural land by registered mail, return receipt requested, or sent by some other means pursuant to which a written verification of receipt is obtained. The disclaimer shall be effective on the date of receipt by the owner of the agricultural land.
-
Delivery of the disclaimer as described in subsection (a) shall have the effect of:
- Relieving the owner of the non-agricultural land of any responsibility to erect or maintain a partition fence pursuant to § 44-8-202; and
- Releasing the owner of the agricultural land from any claims by the owner of the non-agricultural land arising out of the non-existence or condition of a partition fence.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Agricultural land” has the same meaning as set forth in § 67-5-1004; and
-
“Non-agricultural land” means land:
- That is not agricultural land;
- That is the site of a residence; and
- On which the owner does not keep livestock.
-
- If property that meets the definition of non-agricultural land at the time of delivery of a disclaimer as described in subsection (a) subsequently ceases to qualify as non-agricultural land, then the disclaimer, and all effects of the disclaimer as described in subsection (b), shall cease to be effective as of the date property ceases to be non-agricultural property.
- If a fence is erected by the owner of agricultural land during a period when a disclaimer as described in subsection (a) is in effect, and if the land owned by the disclaiming party subsequently ceases to be qualified as non-agricultural land, then the owner of the non-agricultural land shall reimburse the owner of the agricultural land a proportionate share of the cost of erecting the fence. If the parties cannot agree as to the amount to be paid to the owner of the agricultural land, the process described in § 44-8-204 shall be applicable.
Acts 1999, ch. 266, § 2.
Cross-References. Certified mail instead of registered mail, § 1-3-111.
Fences to be erected and maintained at joint expense, § 44-8-202.
Part 3
Common Enclosures
44-8-301. Damages for failure to keep up fences, or for trespass.
It is lawful for two (2) or more owners of adjoining farms to enclose the same under one (1) common fence or enclosure, to be kept up to the standard of a lawful fence by each owner upon that owner's own land, or in such manner and proportion as the owners may agree upon in writing. In the absence of an agreement, the owner of any of the land embraced in the common fence shall be liable to the owners of the other lands and their tenants for all damages to their lands, pastures, fruit trees, crops, or vegetables, occasioned by the failure or neglect of the other owner to keep and maintain the common fence on that owner's land up to the standard of a lawful fence, or by the owner's own stock or that of the owner's tenants trespassing beyond the owner's own land within the common enclosure.
Acts 1875, ch. 64, § 2; 1897, ch. 48, § 1; Shan., § 3001a1; Code 1932, § 5216; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1715, 44-9-301.
Cross-References. Cattle guards, title 65, ch. 6, part 3.
Cited: Porter v. Poole, 8 Tenn. App. 453, 1928 Tenn. App. LEXIS 161 (1928).
44-8-302. Common enclosure of lands under written agreements — Specifications.
It is lawful to prescribe, in such an agreement, the means and method by which the common enclosure shall be constructed and maintained, regulations for the use and enjoyment by each owner of the lands embraced in the enclosure, the penalties to be imposed upon each for violations and how the penalties shall be imposed, the mode of assessment of damages occasioned by trespassing stock of the parties to the agreement, and the length of time it shall continue in force. The agreement may also provide for impounding, feeding, and caring for trespassing stock of the parties to the agreement found within the common enclosure, and for a lien upon trespassing stock to secure the penalties and damages assessed against the owner on that account, and for the enforcement of the lien by sale. All such provisions, not in violation of any law, shall be binding upon all parties to the agreement.
Acts 1897, ch. 48, § 2; Shan., § 3001a2; Code 1932, § 5217; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1716, 44-9-302.
44-8-303. Force and binding power of agreement.
Any such agreement shall continue in force and be binding upon all the parties to the agreement and their heirs and devisees, for the period prescribed in the agreement, unless rescinded by mutual consent. The agreement may be modified or amended in writing signed by all the parties, at any time. After the expiration of the period prescribed, the agreement shall be deemed continued by unanimous consent, unless between November 1 and January 1, some party to the agreement or the party's heir or devisee gives notice in writing to all the other parties to the agreement, resident in the county, of the party's intention to terminate the agreement, in which event the agreement shall terminate at the expiration of ninety (90) days from the service of the notice.
Acts 1897, ch. 48, § 3; 1901, ch. 161, § 1; Shan., § 3001a3; Code 1932, § 5218; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1717, 44-9-303.
44-8-304. Agreement if registered is binding on purchaser, his heirs and assigns.
- The agreement may be acknowledged and registered in the county or counties in which the lands and any part of the lands are situated.
- In case of registration, the agreement shall be binding upon any purchaser of any of the lands embraced in the common enclosure, and the purchaser's heirs and assigns, in the same manner and to the same extent as if the purchaser had been an original party to the agreement.
Acts 1897, ch. 48, § 4; Shan., § 3001a4; Code 1932, § 5219; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1718, 44-9-304.
44-8-305. Liability of persons not parties to agreement for trespass by stock.
Any person not a party to the agreement whose stock trespasses upon the common enclosure shall be liable to the injured party for all damages that the person sustains, and the party so damaged has all the rights and liens given by law to persons damaged by stock trespassing upon enclosures that are not common; provided, the common enclosure is at the time a lawful enclosure or fence.
Acts 1897, ch. 48, § 5; Shan., § 3001a5; Code 1932, § 5220; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1719, 44-9-305.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 9.
Part 4
Running at Large
44-8-401. Livestock not to run at large — Punishment.
- It is unlawful for the owners of any livestock, as defined in § 43-1-114, to willfully allow the livestock to run at large in this state.
- A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1947, ch. 52, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 5087.1 (Williams, § 5077.1); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1401, 44-8-101; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 2014, ch. 568, § 4.
Amendments. The 2014 amendment substituted “as defined in § 43-1-114” for “as livestock is commonly known and defined” in (a).
Effective Dates. Acts 2014, ch. 568, § 6. March 21, 2014.
Cross-References. Cattle guards, title 65, ch. 6, part 3.
Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 33; 13 Tenn. Juris., Fences, § 1.
Law Reviews.
Negligence — Animals on Highway — Motor Vehicle Accident, 28 Tenn. L. Rev. 290.
Cited: Lowery v. Faires, 57 F. Supp. 2d 483, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22594 (E.D. Tenn. 1998); McElroy v. Carter, — S.W.3d —, 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 635 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 29, 2006).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Construction and Interpretation.
Although not specifically repealed with the passage of this section, the mischievous livestock statutes, §§ 44-8-109 — 44-8-111, are essentially impossible to reconcile with legislative policy of contemporary law. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
2. Elements of Offense.
This section makes the owner of escaping animals liable only where he knowingly or negligently permits their escape. Overbey v. Poteat, 206 Tenn. 146, 332 S.W.2d 197, 1960 Tenn. LEXIS 354 (1960).
3. Damages.
Where declaration was bottomed not only on negligence of owner in permitting bull to escape but also on negligence in not securing animal after knowledge that it had escaped, recovery could be had in personal injury suit even though owner of animal had complied with fencing statutes. Groce Provision Co. v. Dortch, 49 Tenn. App. 57, 350 S.W.2d 409, 1961 Tenn. App. LEXIS 96 (1961).
Under T.C.A. § 44-8-401, the owner of escaping animals is not absolutely liable for damages to another's property but is only liable where he knowingly or negligently permits their escape or fails to recapture. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983); Way v. Bohannon, 688 S.W.2d 89, 1985 Tenn. App. LEXIS 2611 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985).
4. Negligence.
In suit by automobile owner against horse owner for damages resulting from collision between automobile and horse, owner of horse not liable, if, without his fault, animal has escaped from pasture enclosed by lawful fence or by one such as is generally required to restrain such animal; doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply to this class of case. Rodgers v. Webb, 335 F. Supp. 584, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10185 (E.D. Tenn. 1971).
In a suit by an automobile driver against a horse owner for damages resulting from a collision between the automobile and the horse, the jury could infer negligence from evidence that the horse owner did not place a gate in front of his stopgap and that the horse owner knew or should have known that his horses had escaped onto the highway on a number of occasions previous to the accident. Higgins v. Vinson, 549 S.W.2d 161, 1976 Tenn. App. LEXIS 255 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1976).
5. Notoriously Mischievous.
Seven incidences of cattle escaping during four-year period was not showing cattle were “notoriously mischievous” either as a circumstance under this section or as an independent ground under § 44-8-109. Troutt v. Branham, 660 S.W.2d 502, 1983 Tenn. App. LEXIS 703 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
Collateral References.
Construction and application of ordinances relating to unrestrained dogs, cats, or other domesticated animals. 1 A.L.R.4th 994.
Constitutionality of fencing and stock laws. 6 A.L.R. 212, 18 A.L.R. 67.
Injunction to restrain repeated or continuing trespass by livestock and fowls. 32 A.L.R. 522, 60 A.L.R.2d 310.
Liability for damage to motor vehicle or injury to person riding therein by animal at large in street or highway. 21 A.L.R.4th 132, 21 A.L.R.4th 159, 29 A.L.R.4th 431.
Liability for personal injury or death caused by trespassing or intruding livestock. 49 A.L.R.4th 710.
Owner's liability, under legislation forbidding domestic animals to run at large on highways, as dependent on negligence. 34 A.L.R.2d 1285.
44-8-402. Lien for damages.
For any damages occasioned by stock running at large in violation of § 44-8-401, the person so damaged shall have a lien upon the stock, which lien shall be enforced by attachment before a judge of the court of general sessions in the same manner and to the same extent as other liens are enforced.
Acts 1947, ch. 52, § 2; C. Supp. 1950, § 5087.2 (Williams, § 5077.2); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1402; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-8-102.
Collateral References.
Lien on animal damage feasant, character and extent of claims for which attaches. 26 A.L.R. 1047.
44-8-403. [Repealed.]
Code 1858, § 1663 (deriv. Acts 1803, ch. 20, §§ 1, 4); Shan., § 2849; mod. Code 1932, § 5078; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1403, 44-8-103; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 73, § 1, effective April 6, 2015.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-403 concerned penalty for stallion or jackass running at large.
44-8-404. [Repealed.]
Code 1858, § 1664; Shan., § 2850; Code 1932, § 5079; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1404; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-8-104; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 73, § 1, effective April 6, 2015.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-404 concerned animal to be advertised.
44-8-405. [Repealed.]
Code 1858, § 1665 (deriv. Acts 1803, ch. 20, § 2); Shan., § 2851; mod. Code 1932, § 5080; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1405; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-8-105; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 73, § 1, effective April 6, 2015.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-405 concerned gelding unclaimed animal; costs.
44-8-406. [Repealed.]
Code 1858, § 1666 (deriv. Acts 1803, ch. 20, § 3); Shan., § 2852; Code 1932, § 5081; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1406, 44-8-106; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 73, § 1, effective April 6, 2015.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-406 concerned animals being treated as strays when owner unknown or residing out of county.
44-8-407. [Repealed.]
Code 1858, § 1667; Shan., § 2853; Code 1932, § 5082; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1407; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-8-107; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 73, § 1, effective April 6, 2015.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-407 concerned compensation to taker-up.
44-8-408. Dogs not allowed at large — Exception — Penalties.
- As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, “owner” means a person who, at the time of the offense, regularly harbors, keeps or exercises control over the dog, but does not include a person who, at the time of the offense, is temporarily harboring, keeping or exercising control over the dog.
- The owner of a dog commits an offense if that dog goes uncontrolled by the owner upon the premises of another without the consent of the owner of the premises or other person authorized to give consent, or goes uncontrolled by the owner upon a highway, public road, street or any other place open to the public generally.
-
It is an exception to the application of this section that:
- The dog was on a hunt or chase;
- The dog was on the way to or from a hunt or chase;
- The dog was guarding or driving stock or on the way to guard or drive stock;
- The dog was being moved from one place to another by the owner of the dog;
- The dog is a police or military dog, the injury occurred during the course of the dog's official duties and the person injured was a party to, a participant in or suspected of being a party to or participant in the act or conduct that prompted the police or military to utilize the services of the dog;
- The violation of subsection (b) occurred while the injured person was on the private property of the dog's owner with the intent to engage in unlawful activity while on the property;
- The violation of subsection (b) occurred while the dog was protecting the dog's owner or other innocent party from attack by the injured person or an animal owned by the injured person;
- The violation of subsection (b) occurred while the dog was securely confined in a kennel, crate or other enclosure; or
- The violation of subsection (b) occurred as a result of the injured person disturbing, harassing, assaulting or otherwise provoking the dog.
- The exception to the application of this section provided in subdivisions (c)(1)-(4) shall not apply unless the owner in violation of subsection (b) pays or tenders payment for all damages caused by the dog to the injured party within thirty (30) days of the damage being caused.
- It is not a defense to prosecution for a violation of subsection (b) and punished pursuant to subdivision (g)(1), (g)(2) or (g)(3) that the dog owner exercised reasonable care in attempting to confine or control the dog.
- It is an affirmative defense to prosecution for a violation of subsection (b) and punished pursuant to subdivision (g)(4) or (g)(5) that the dog owner exercised reasonable care in attempting to confine or control the dog.
-
- A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor punishable by fine only.
- A violation of this section is a Class B misdemeanor punishable by fine only if the dog running at large causes damage to the property of another.
- A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by fine only if the dog running at large causes bodily injury, as defined by § 39-11-106, to another.
- A violation of this section is a Class E felony if the dog running at large causes serious bodily injury, as defined by § 39-11-106, to another.
- A violation of this section is a Class D felony if the dog running at large causes the death of another.
-
Notwithstanding subsection (g), a violation of this section shall be punished as provided in subsection (i) if the violation involves:
- A dog that was trained to fight, attack or kill or had been used to fight; or
- The owner of the dog violating this section knew of the dangerous nature of the dog and, prior to the violation of this section, the dog had bitten one (1) or more people that resulted in serious bodily injury or death.
-
A violation of this section, where one (1) or more of the factors set out in subsection (h) are present, shall be punished as follows:
- A Class C misdemeanor if the dog running at large does not cause property damage, injury or death;
- A Class A misdemeanor if the dog running at large causes damage to the property of another;
- A Class E felony if the dog running at large causes bodily injury to another;
- A Class D felony if the dog running at large causes serious bodily injury to another; and
- A Class C felony if the dog running at large causes the death of another.
-
- In addition to the authority granted by §§ 5-1-120, 6-2-201(30), 6-19-101(a)(31), 6-33-101, and 7-1-102, a local government may authorize by resolution or ordinance, as applicable, an animal control agency to seize and take into custody any dog found trespassing on the premises of another.
-
For purposes of this subsection (j):
- “Animal control agency” means a county or municipal animal shelter, dog pound, or animal control agency; private humane society; state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency; or any combination thereof, that temporarily houses stray, unwanted, or injured animals; and
- “Local government” means any county, municipality, city, or town.
Acts 1901, ch. 50, § 1; 1903, ch. 419, § 1; Shan., § 2853a4; Code 1932, § 5086; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1408, 44-8-108; Acts 2007, ch. 533, § 1; 2007, ch. 556, § 1; 2016, ch. 1013, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. Acts 2007, ch. 533, § 1 directed that § 44-8-409 be amended, effective July 1, 2007; Acts 2007, ch. 556, § 2 directed that § 44-8-409 be deleted in its entirety, effective July 1, 2007. Under the direction of the code commission, the amended provisions of § 44-8-409 were added to this section as subsections (h) and (i).
Amendments. The 2007 amendment by ch. 533 added (h) and (i). See the Compiler's Notes.
The 2007 amendment by ch. 556 rewrote the section which read: “It is unlawful for any person to allow a dog belonging to or under the control of such person, or that may be habitually found on premises occupied by the person, or immediately under the control of such person, to go upon the premises of another, or upon a highway or upon a public road or street; provided, that this section and § 44-8-409 shall not apply to a dog on a hunt or chase, or on the way to or from a hunt or chase, nor to a dog guarding or driving stock, or on the way for that purpose, nor to a dog being moved from one (1) place to another, by a person owning or controlling a dog; provided, that the foregoing exemptions shall not apply unless all damages done by dogs therein exempted, to the person or property of another, shall be paid or tendered to the person so damaged, or to the person's agent, within thirty (30) days after the damage is done.”
The 2016 amendment added (j).
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, ch. 533, § 2. July 1, 2007.
Acts 2007, ch. 556, § 3. July 1, 2007.
Acts 2016, ch. 1013, § 2. April 28, 2016.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A, B and C misdemeanors, § 40-35-111.
Penalty for Class C, D and E felonies, § 40-35-111.
Textbooks. Tennessee Forms (Robinson, Ramsey and Harwell), No. 1-8-3.
Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, §§ 30, 31; 13 Tenn. Juris., Game and Game Laws, § 3.
Law Reviews.
The Standard of Care for Veterinarians in Medical Malpractice Claims (Joseph H. King, Jr.), 58 Tenn. L. Rev. 1 (1990).
Cited: Birdsong v. Wilkinson, 13 Tenn. App. 276, 1931 Tenn. App. LEXIS 70 (1931); Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964); McAbee v. Daniel, 60 Tenn. App. 239, 445 S.W.2d 917, 1968 Tenn. App. LEXIS 285 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1968); McElroy v. Carter, — S.W.3d —, 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 635 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 29, 2006).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Nature and Purpose.
The purpose of the statute is to protect persons and property from injury by dogs. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
This section is not inconsistent with § 70-4-106 prohibiting unauthorized entry on land of another to take or kill wildlife. Watts v. State, 219 Tenn. 188, 407 S.W.2d 678, 1966 Tenn. LEXIS 517 (1966).
2. Dogs at Large.
Where dog was allowed to come and go at will while owners were away from home, such animal was at large within the meaning of this section. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
A dog is at large when it is free and unrestrained and not under the control of its master. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
In personal injury action by pedestrian for injuries received when struck by automobile after it skidded on wet pavement while driver was attempting to avoid pedestrian's dog, where record showed that dog had left pedestrian and started diagonally down and across highway when accident occurred, trial court did not err in submitting to jury questions of whether dog was “at large” in violation of statute and, if so, whether violation of statute proximately caused or contributed to plaintiff's injuries. Provence v. Williams, 62 Tenn. App. 371, 462 S.W.2d 885, 1970 Tenn. App. LEXIS 272 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970).
3. Dogs Not at Large.
Dog was not running at large where with assent of owner's family it was placed in a fox chase. King v. Dunlap, 4 Tenn. Civ. App. (4 Higgins) 579 (1914).
This section is directed to dogs running at large and under no control and does not extend to a dog accompanying its master along the highway. Dalton v. Dean, 175 Tenn. 620, 136 S.W.2d 721, 1939 Tenn. LEXIS 82 (1939).
Where a dog was killed while accompanying the boys owning it crossing the street, it was not “at large” within the meaning of this section so far as to bar recovery for its killing on ground that it was running at large in violation of this section. Dalton v. Dean, 175 Tenn. 620, 136 S.W.2d 721, 1939 Tenn. LEXIS 82 (1939).
4. Injury to Dog at Large — Right of Recovery.
Where dog was killed by train while running at large on railroad track without knowledge, consent, fault or connivance of the owner, owner could recover for its wrongful killing. Southern Ry. v. Oliver, 3 Tenn. Civ. App. (3 Higgins) 408 (1912).
Owner of dog who allowed it to go upon a railroad track where it was killed by train could not recover. Cincinnati, N.O. & T.P.R.R. v. Ford, 139 Tenn. 291, 202 S.W. 72, 1917 Tenn. LEXIS 105 (1917).
One has no right to kill a dog, unlawfully at large, when she is not molesting him. Franer v. English, 8 Tenn. App. 121, — S.W.2d —, 1928 Tenn. App. LEXIS 117 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1928).
In action for negligent killing of dog by automobile being driven on wrong side of road, gross negligence of driver prevented his reliance upon the contributory negligence of the dog's owner in allowing the dog to go on the highway in violation of statute. Stagner v. Craig, 159 Tenn. 511, 19 S.W.2d 234, 1928 Tenn. LEXIS 113 (1929), overruled in part, McIntyre v. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d 52, 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 336 (Tenn. 1992).
5. Civil Liability.
Fact that owner of property who was injured by dog did not object to dog's presence on the property did not prevent a violation of the statute. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
Failure to perform statutory duty of preventing dog from running at large is negligence per se and if injury is the proximate result or consequence of the negligent act there is liability. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
Question of whether allowing dog to run at large was proximate cause of injury of plaintiff who was knocked down and injured by such dog was for jury. Alex v. Armstrong, 215 Tenn. 276, 385 S.W.2d 110, 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 564 (Tenn. Dec. 11, 1964).
6. Assumption of Risk.
Bicyclist had legal right to ride bicycle on public street so long as she did so in lawful manner, and it was prejudicial error for court to instruct as to assumption of risk where bicyclist was bitten by dog while riding in the street and there was no evidence that she had ever harassed the dog, attempted to entice it into the street, or had any previous encounter with it. Bell v. Chawkins, 62 Tenn. App. 213, 460 S.W.2d 850, 1970 Tenn. App. LEXIS 261 (1970).
Collateral References.
Constitutionality of law regulating right of dogs to run streets. 49 A.L.R. 852.
44-8-409. [Transferred.]
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-409 (Acts 1901, ch. 50, § 3; Shan., § 2853a5; Code 1932, § 5087; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1409, 44-8-109; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning violation of § 44-8-408, was amended by Acts Acts 2007, ch. 533 and Acts 2007, ch. 556, § 2, effective July 1, 2007, and transferred to § 44-8-408. For the current provisions see § 44-8-408(h) and (i).
44-8-410. Bitches to be confined while proud.
Every owner of a bitch is required to confine the same for twenty-four (24) days during the time the bitch is proud.
Acts 1901, ch. 122, § 1; Shan., § 2853a1; Code 1932, § 5083; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1410, 44-8-110.
44-8-411. No liability for killing proud bitch at large.
Any person crippling, killing, or in any way destroying a proud bitch that is running at large shall not be held liable for the damages due to such killing or destruction.
Acts 1901, ch. 22, § 2; Shan., § 2853a2; mod. Code 1932, § 5084; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1411, 44-8-111.
Cross-References. No damages for killing dog killing or worrying livestock, § 44-17-203.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 5.
44-8-412. Violation of § 44-8-410 a misdemeanor.
A violation of § 44-8-410 is a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1901, ch. 22, § 3; Shan., § 2853a3; Code 1932, § 5085; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1412, 44-8-112; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-8-413. Civil liability for injury caused by dogs.
-
- The owner of a dog has a duty to keep that dog under reasonable control at all times, and to keep that dog from running at large. A person who breaches that duty is subject to civil liability for any damages suffered by a person who is injured by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in or on the private property of another.
- The owner may be held liable regardless of whether the dog has shown any dangerous propensities or whether the dog's owner knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensities.
-
Subsection (a) shall not be construed to impose liability upon the owner of the dog if:
- The dog is a police or military dog, the injury occurred during the course of the dog's official duties and the person injured was a party to, a participant in or suspected of being a party to or participant in the act or conduct that prompted the police or military to utilize the services of the dog;
- The injured person was trespassing upon the private, nonresidential property of the dog's owner;
- The injury occurred while the dog was protecting the dog's owner or other innocent party from attack by the injured person or a dog owned by the injured person;
- The injury occurred while the dog was securely confined in a kennel, crate or other enclosure; or
- The injury occurred as a result of the injured person enticing, disturbing, alarming, harassing, or otherwise provoking the dog.
-
- If a dog causes damage to a person while the person is on residential, farm or other noncommercial property, and the dog's owner is the owner of the property, or is on the property by permission of the owner or as a lawful tenant or lessee, in any civil action based upon such damages brought against the owner of the dog, the claimant shall be required to establish that the dog's owner knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensities.
- The element of proof required by subdivision (c)(1) shall be in addition to any other elements the claimant may be required to prove in order to establish a claim under the prevailing Tennessee law of premises liability or comparative fault.
- The statute of limitations for an action brought pursuant to this section shall be the same as provided in § 28-3-104, for personal injury actions.
-
As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Owner” means a person who, at the time of the damage caused to another, regularly harbors, keeps, or exercises control over the dog, but does not include a person who, at the time of the damage, is temporarily harboring, keeping, or exercising control over the dog; provided, however, that land ownership alone is not enough to qualify a landowner as a regular harborer even if the landowner gave permission to a third person to keep the dog on the land; and
- “Running at large” means a dog goes uncontrolled by the dog's owner upon the premises of another without the consent of the owner of the premises, or other person authorized to give consent, or goes uncontrolled by the owner upon a highway, public road, street or any other place open to the public generally.
Acts 2007, ch. 276, § 1; 2016, ch. 662, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. Acts 2007, ch. 276, § 2 provided that the act shall be known and may be cited as the “Diana Acklen Act of 2007.”
Acts 2016, ch. 662, § 2, provided that the act, which amended this section, shall apply to all cases tried on or after July 1, 2016.
Amendments. The 2016 amendment, in (e)(1), inserted a comma following “keeps” and “keeping”, and added the proviso at the end.
Effective Dates. Acts 2007, ch. 276, § 3. July 1, 2007.
Acts 2016, ch. 662, § 2. July 1, 2016.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Construction.
T.C.A. § 44-8-413 creates a significant distinction between (1) injuries caused by dogs that are running at large, defined at T.C.A. § 44-8-413(e)(2) as uncontrolled by the dog's owner upon the premises of another without the consent of the owner of the premises or upon a highway, public road, street or any other place open to the public generally, and that are in a public place or lawfully in or on the private property of another, and (2) dogs that cause injury while on their owner's property. Moore v. Gaut, — S.W.3d —, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 995 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2015).
For cases where the dog caused injury on its owner's property, the statute clearly retains and codifies the common law requirement that a claimant establish that the dog's owner knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensities. T.C.A. § 44-8-413(c)(1). Moore v. Gaut, — S.W.3d —, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 995 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2015).
Upon a plain reading of the statute, giving the word “any” its natural and ordinary meaning, the Dog Bite Statute applies to each and every civil suit falling within the specific category of cases dealt with by subsection (c)(1); the words of the statute are clear and unambiguous, and subsection (c)(1) of the Dog Bite Statute abrogates common law claims falling within its parameters. Searcy v. Axley, — S.W.3d —, 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 699 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017).
Where parents claimed that a dog injured their child while on its owners' property, they had to comply with the substantive requirements of the Dog Bite Statute. Searcy v. Axley, — S.W.3d —, 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 699 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017).
2. Owner's Knowledge.
Trial court properly found on summary judgment that the dog owner, by testifying in his affidavit that his dog never bit or attacked anyone before the satellite dish worker, had negated the element of knowledge or notice of the dog's dangerous propensity, especially since all of the evidence tended to show that the owner believed his dog was friendly, gentle, and jovial before the bite occurred, it was undisputed that the dog did not get outside the fence, and the worker was the one who approached the dog. Moore v. Gaut, — S.W.3d —, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 995 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2015).
In parents' action seeking to recover for their child's injury, the trial court properly granted dog owners summary judgment because they did not know nor should they have known that the dog had dangerous propensities; every witness testified that other than jumping on and scratching people, the dog had shown no vicious or dangerous behavior, and the evidence showed that the owners were concerned about the child being merely scratched, not that they had any knowledge that the dog was dangerous. Searcy v. Axley, — S.W.3d —, 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 699 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017).
3. Police Dog.
Sheriff's department was not entitled to summary judgment, when a police officer sought to recover compensatory damages for personal injury caused by a police dog, because the officer was bitten by the department's police dog while pursuing a suspect. Thus, the act or conduct that prompted the need for the services of the police dog was the fleeing suspect, not the officer's request for assistance in the pursuit of the suspect. Greenlee v. Sevier Cty., — S.W.3d —, 2018 Tenn. App. LEXIS 223 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2018).
Part 5
Grazing [Repealed]
44-8-501. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-501 (Code 1858, § 1652 (deriv. Acts 1835-1836, ch. 62, § 2); Shan., § 2786; Code 1932, § 5017; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1601, 44-8-201), concerning ranging leave not to be given to residents, was repealed by 1999 Acts, ch. 266, § 5.
44-8-502. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-8-502 (Code 1858, § 1651 (deriv. Acts 1835-1836, ch. 62, § 1); Shan., § 2785; Code 1932, § 5016; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1602, 44-8-202), concerning the penalty for nonresidents driving stock from abroad to range here, was repealed by 1999 Acts, ch. 266, § 5.
Chapter 9
Fences And Enclosures [Transferred]
Part 1
General Provisions [Transferred]
44-9-101 — 44-9-114. [Transferred.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-9-101 — 44-9-114, concerning general provisions, was transferred to ch. 8, part 1 of this title in 1987.
Chapter 10
Dealers and Purchasers of Poultry, Livestock and Hides
Part 1
General Provisions [Repealed]
44-10-101. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101 — 44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 — 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 — 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 — 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-102. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-103. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-104. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-105. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-106. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-107. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-108. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
44-10-109. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 1, §§ 44-10-101-44-10-109 (Acts 1899, ch. 18, §§ 1, 2; Acts 1903, ch. 61, §§ 1-3; Shan., §§ 2848a1, 2848a2, 6888a43, 6888a44, 6888a45; mod. Code 1932, §§ 5076, 5077, 11400, 11401; Acts 1939, ch. 117, §§ 1-4; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6579.19 - 6579.22 (Williams, §§ 6579.21 - 6529.24); impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 44-1901 - 44-1909; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning general provisions for dealers and purchasers of poultry, livestock and hides, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 1, effective June 30, 2010.
Part 2
Tennessee Livestock Dealer Act
44-10-201. Short title.
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Tennessee Livestock Dealer Act.”
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1910.
44-10-202. Part definitions.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Alternative livestock” means non-traditional livestock that are hoofed and captive-farmed for purposes of agricultural or recreational use, as defined by § 70-4-403(3);
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture or the commissioner's appointed agent;
- “Livestock” means cattle, calves, horses, mules, poultry, swine, sheep, goats, and alternative livestock;
- “Livestock dealer” means any person who buys, receives or assembles livestock for resale for that person's own account or that of another person more than nine (9) times in any consecutive three-month period;
- “Livestock producer” means any person who sells only livestock such person has raised or such person has owned and had in possession for a minimum of sixty (60) days; and
- “Person” means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-1911; Acts 2004, ch. 526, § 1; 2010, ch. 717, § 2.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment added the definition of “alternative livestock”; rewrote the definition of “livestock” which read: “‘Livestock’ means cattle, equine, swine, sheep, or goats;”; in the definition for “livestock dealer”, substituted “for resale for that person's” for “for resale, either for that person's”, and added “more than nine (9) times in any consecutive three (3) month period” to the end; and substituted “such” for “that that” in two places in the definition of “livestock producer”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-10-203. License required — Fee.
Any person doing business as a livestock dealer must procure from the commissioner an annual license. Application for the annual license or its renewal shall be made on forms provided by the commissioner and accompanied by payment of a license fee set by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703. Upon a determination that the applicant is qualified, the commissioner shall issue a license to the applicant, and all annual licenses shall terminate and become void on June 30 in the calendar year following issuance of the license or renewal.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 3; T.C.A., § 44-1912; 2015, ch. 485, § 21.
Amendments. The 2015 amendment rewrote the section, which read: “Any person doing business as a livestock dealer must secure an annual license from the commissioner. Application for the annual license shall be made on forms provided by the commissioner. A fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) shall accompany any such application for initial issuance or renewals. The fees so received are not returnable and shall be kept in a special fund for the administration of this part. Upon a determination that the applicant is qualified, the commissioner shall issue a license to the applicant and all such annual licenses shall terminate and become void each successive June 30.”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
44-10-204. Powers and duties of commissioner.
The commissioner has the power and duty to:
- Promulgate such rules and regulations as the commissioner deems necessary to implement and supplement this part and provide for its orderly administration;
- Prescribe necessary information to be provided by applicants for licenses to determine if the requirements of this part have been met;
- Issue licenses to qualified applicants and collect appropriate fees;
- Revoke or suspend the license of, or refuse to issue a license to, any person, licensee, or applicant who violates any provision of this part; and
- Require the necessary record keeping by licensees and submission of written reports, as warranted, in order to carry out the provision and intent of this part.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 4; T.C.A., § 44-1913.
44-10-205. License revocation or suspension — Hearing — Review.
- In the event the commissioner has reason to believe a licensee has violated any of the provisions of this part, including the rules and regulations promulgated under this part, the commissioner shall conduct a hearing, pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, part 3, to determine if the license shall be suspended or revoked.
- The commissioner has the power to subpoena any persons or record incident to the hearing, and a charge of contumacy may be filed for those who refuse to comply; and the commissioner may administer oaths to those giving evidence. A court reporter shall be in attendance.
-
Following the hearing, the commissioner may:
- Permanently revoke the license;
- Temporarily revoke the license; or
- Suspend the license for a definite period of time.
- The action of the commissioner may be reviewed by common law writ of certiorari to the chancery or circuit court of the county of the licensee who is the subject of the commissioner's action, and the petition shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of the commissioner's order. Upon the grant of the writ of certiorari, the commissioner shall certify to the court a complete transcript of the proceedings instituted before the commissioner. This certified transcript shall constitute the whole record, and no additional proof or evidence shall be considered by the chancery court of Davidson County.
- The decision of the commissioner shall remain final until modified by the commissioner or by the courts.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 5; T.C.A., § 44-1914; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 3.
Compiler's Notes. Subsections (d) and (e) of this section are superseded by § 4-5-322(b) to the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between this section and the provisions of § 4-5-322(b). See § 4-5-103(b).
Amendments. The 2010 amendment in (a), substituted “has violated” for “is guilty of violating”, inserted “, pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, part 3”, and deleted the former last sentence which read: “A ten day notice shall be given and the hearing conducted at Ellington Agricultural Center, Nashville.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-10-206. Prohibited acts.
The following actions are prohibited:
- Any person acting as a livestock dealer without a valid license issued by the commissioner;
- Failure to maintain records as required by the commissioner, including the names and addresses of sellers and buyers of livestock;
- Failure to provide access to all records required of such licensee by the commissioner;
- Buying or selling livestock under an assumed name or address. All livestock sales shall be evidenced by a written bona fide name and address of buyer and seller;
- Violation of any valid rule, regulation or statute governing livestock disease control;
- Failure to make payment to a buyer or seller, or making such payment with insufficient funds; and
- Failure to keep current bond requirements pursuant to 9 C.F.R. § 201, et seq.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 6; T.C.A., § 44-1915; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 4.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment substituted “including” for “especially” in (2), and added (6) and (7).
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-10-207. Exemptions from law.
This part shall not apply to any livestock producer who may occasionally buy or sell livestock in connection with that person's farming operations.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 7; T.C.A., § 44-1916; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 5.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment rewrote this section which read: “This part shall not apply to livestock producers or persons holding a valid license under chapter 11 of this title. Neither shall this part apply to any farmer who may occasionally buy or sell livestock in connection with that person's farming operations and who is not primarily engaged in the business of buying and selling livestock, as determined by the commissioner.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-10-208. Penalty for violations.
To operate as a livestock dealer without a valid license, or otherwise violate this part, is a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 8; 1977, ch. 32, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-1917; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 2004, ch. 526, § 2.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-10-209. Enjoining violations of law.
The commissioner, on determining that any person may have violated any provision of this part, may petition for injunctive relief from further violation. The petition should be addressed to the chancery court in the county in which the offense occurred or in which the offender's principal place of business is located or where the offender is doing business or resides. The chancellor, on determining that probable cause of a violation of this part exists, shall issue appropriate injunctive relief.
Acts 1973, ch. 112, § 9; T.C.A., § 44-1918.
Chapter 11
Livestock Sales
44-11-101. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Alternative livestock” means non-traditional livestock that are hoofed and captive-farmed for purposes of agricultural or recreational use, as defined by § 70-4-403(3);
- “Breed association” means a bona fide livestock breed association which conducts sales of livestock breeds recognized by the department in which such association assumes responsibility for conducting the sales, assumes title to any livestock sold, and accrues a majority of profits from the sales;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
- “Consignor” means any person consigning, shipping, or delivering livestock to a livestock market for sale, resale, or exchange;
- “Department” means the department of agriculture;
- “Livestock” means cattle, calves, horses, mules, poultry, swine, sheep, goats, and alternative livestock;
- “Livestock market” means any location where livestock is assembled and sold at public auction, on a commission basis, or otherwise for the compensation of the owner or operator, during regularly scheduled or special sales;
- “Livestock producer” means any person who sells only livestock such person has raised or such person has owned and had in possession for a minimum of sixty (60) days;
- “Operator” means any person conducting business as a livestock market;
- “Person” means any person, firm, or corporation; and
- “Representative” means an employee or designee of the commissioner.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2301; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 6.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment added the definitions for “alternative livestock”, “breed association”, “livestock market”, and “livestock producer”; deleted the definitions for “community sale” and “official vaccinate” which read: “ ‘Community sale’ means any sale or exchange of livestock held by any person at an established place of business or premises where the livestock is assembled for sale or exchange and is sold or exchanged at auction, or upon a commission basis, or at a private sale, at regular or irregular intervals but more frequently than three (3) times a year; provided, that ‘community sale’ does not apply to established public stockyards whose federal veterinary inspection is maintained, or to farm or purebred livestock sales;“‘Official vaccinate’ means a bovine animal vaccinated against brucellosis from four (4) through eight (8) months of age, under the supervision of a federal or state veterinary official, with a vaccine approved by the commissioner, permanently identified as such a vaccinate, and reported at the time of vaccination to the appropriate state or federal agency cooperating in the eradication of brucellosis;”; substituted “livestock market” for “community sale” in the definition of “consignor”; rewrote the definition of “livestock” which read: “‘Livestock’ means cattle, swine, sheep, goats, horses, mules, and poultry;”; rewrote the definition of “operator” which read: “‘Operator’ means any person holding, conducting or carrying on a community sale;”; and inserted “or designee” in the definition of “representative”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Cross-References. Public livestock market charters, title 44, ch. 12.
Purchasers of livestock, licensing, title 44, ch. 10.
Comparative Legislation. Livestock sales:
Ala. Code § 2-15-40 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 4-6-1 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 261.375 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 277.010 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 106-406 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-692 et seq.
Collateral References. Trade Regulation 872.
44-11-102. License required — Application.
-
No person shall conduct the business of a livestock market without a valid license from the department.
-
The application for a license shall be on forms prescribed and furnished by the department, and shall include:
- The name, address and phone number of the livestock market operator;
- The location and description of the establishment or property where the livestock market is to be conducted;
- A report of the types and volume of livestock to be handled, sold or exchanged;
- A copy of property and fire insurance for the livestock market;
- Proof the applicant has met the bonding requirements of 9 C.F.R. 201, et seq.; and
- Such other information as the commissioner may require.
- All applications shall be accompanied by the license fee required by § 44-11-104.
-
The application for a license shall be on forms prescribed and furnished by the department, and shall include:
-
This chapter shall not be construed to include as a livestock market the following:
- Any operation where Future Farmers, 4-H Club groups, or fairs conduct sales of livestock; or
- Any livestock producer or breed association as defined by § 44-11-101.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 2; T.C.A., § 44-2302; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 7.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment rewrote this section which read: “(a) No person shall hold, operate, conduct, or carry on a community sale in this state without first securing a license therefor from the department.“(b) The application for a license shall be on forms prescribed and furnished by the department, and shall set forth:“(1) The name and address of the community sale yard and the name of the operator of the yard;“(2) The location of the establishment or premises where the community sale is to be conducted;“(3) The types or kinds of livestock to be handled, sold or exchanged;“(4) A description of the facilities to be used in conducting the community sales; and“(5) Such other information as the department may require.“(c) All applications shall be accompanied by a bond and the fee required by §§ 44-11-103 and 44-11-104.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-11-103. Local regulation or prohibition of exhibition of livestock restricted.
-
As used in this section:
- “Exhibition of livestock” means a show or sale of livestock at a fair or elsewhere that is sponsored by or under the control of a county or independent agricultural society, school, university, breed association, fair association, or similar organization; and
- “Local governing body” means the legislative body of a city, municipality, county, or other political subdivision of this state.
- No local governing body shall adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, or other enactment regulating or prohibiting the exhibition of livestock in this state.
- Subsection (b) does not apply to any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, or other enactment regarding the exhibition of livestock in this state, when such enactment is otherwise authorized by state law or is related to reasonable restrictions regarding time, place, and manner consistent with other similar events or the protection of public health, safety, or welfare.
Acts 2020, ch. 742, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. Former § 44-11-103 (Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 3; 1961, ch. 65, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2303), concerning filing a bond when applying for a license to operate and conduct a community livestock sale, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 8, effective June 30, 2010.
Effective Dates. Acts 2020, ch. 742, § 2. June 22, 2020.
44-11-104. Issuance of license — Fee.
- The annual license fee to operate a livestock market shall be set by rule pursuant to § 43-1-703.
- Upon receipt of an application for a license under this section, accompanied by the required bond and license fee, the department shall examine the application and if it finds the application to be in proper form and that the applicant has otherwise complied with this chapter, the department shall grant the license as applied for, subject to this chapter.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 4; T.C.A., § 44-2304; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 9; 2015, ch. 485, § 22.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment substituted “livestock market” for “community sale” in (a).
The 2015 amendment rewrote (a) which read, “The fee for a license to operate a livestock market shall be one hundred dollars ($100) per annum.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 41. July 1, 2015; May 20, 2015, for the purpose of promulgating rules.
44-11-105. Form of licenses — Display — Renewal.
- A separate license shall be required for each establishment or premises where a livestock market is operated or conducted. The original, or a certified copy of the license hereunder, shall be conspicuously displayed by the licensee in the sale ring or some other like prominent place in the establishment or premises licensed.
- Licenses shall expire on June 30 of each year and shall be renewed annually upon like application and procedure as in the case of the original license.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 5; T.C.A., § 44-2305; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 10.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment rewrote this section which read: “(a) Licenses shall be in such form as the department may prescribe, and shall be under the seal of the department, and shall set forth:“(1) The name and address of the community sale yard, and the name of the operator of the yard;“(2) The location of the establishment or premises licensed;“(3) The kinds of livestock to be sold, exchanged, or handled;“(4) The period of the license; and“(5) Such other information as the department may determine.“(b) A separate license shall be required for each establishment or premises where a community sale is operated or conducted. The original, or a certified copy of the license hereunder, shall be conspicuously displayed by the licensee in the sale ring or some other like prominent place in the establishment or premises licensed.“(c) Licenses shall be renewed annually upon like application and procedure as in the case of the original license.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-11-106. Refusal to grant or renew license — Suspension or revocation — Grounds — Notice and hearing — Review.
-
The commissioner may decline to grant or to renew a license, or may suspend or revoke a license upon the following grounds:
- The licensee has violated any provision of this chapter or any rule, order, or regulation issued under this chapter;
- The licensee has knowingly received on consignment or sold or exchanged stolen livestock or mortgaged livestock without authority from the owner or mortgagee;
- The licensee has been guilty of misrepresentation, deception, or fraud in any material particular in securing the license;
- The licensee has failed to keep records as required by this chapter;
- The licensee has failed to practice measures of sanitation and has failed to provide for the adequate yarding, housing, holding, and feeding of livestock;
- The licensee, in the case of livestock weighed on the licensee's scales and sold by weight, has knowingly quoted incorrect weights or has failed to have the scales regularly inspected and tested;
- [Deleted by 2010 amendment.]
- The licensee has engaged in any illegal activity on the premises where the community sale is located, the business violates the zoning regulations of any county, municipal, or regional planning commission, or the licensee has failed to comply with such rules and regulations as have been duly adopted in accordance with this chapter;
- The licensee has failed to comply with the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985, compiled in 7 U.S.C. §§ 2901-2911, or the Agriculture Commodities Promotion Act, compiled in § 43-29-101 et seq.;
- The licensee has failed to make payment after a sale or has made payment with insufficient funds to consigners for livestock sold through the market; or
- The licensee has been determined to be insolvent by the commissioner.
- When any of the foregoing have not been fully complied with, or if there has been a violation of this chapter, the commissioner may give notice to the applicant for a license, or a holder of a license, that the commissioner will conduct a hearing for the purpose of determining whether the commissioner should decline to grant, renew, or suspend or revoke a license pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, part 3. The findings of the commissioner shall be final, and may be reviewed in the chancery court of Davidson County, by the common law writ of certiorari. When zoning is the question involved, the commissioner shall notify the applicant or holder of the license of the violation, and the applicant or holder shall then have only the rights granted in the zoning ordinance or regulation relative to a hearing and appeal, and shall prosecute the application for a hearing and appeal solely under the particular local zoning ordinance or regulation.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 7; T.C.A., § 44-2306; Acts 2010, ch. 717, §§ 11, 12.
Compiler's Notes. The next to last sentence of subsection (b) of this section is superseded by § 4-5-322(b) to the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between that sentence and the provisions of § 4-5-322(b). See § 4-5-103(b).
Amendments. The 2010 amendment, in (a), deleted (7) which read: “The licensee has failed to post a bond or give other security as required herein; or”, added (9)-(11); and, in (b), added “pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act compiled in title 4, chapter 5, part 3.” to the end of the first sentence, and deleted the former second and third sentences which read: “No hearing shall be held without giving the applicant or the holder of a license at least ten (10) days' written notice thereof. The hearings shall be conducted at the time and place designated by the commissioner, and the applicant or the holder of a license shall be entitled to be represented by counsel at such hearings.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-11-107. Sale of livestock — Regulations governing — Inspection — Diseased animals.
Each livestock market may be under the direct supervision of a representative of the department. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no livestock known to be infected with or known to have been exposed to any contagious, infectious or communicable animal disease or infestation shall be consigned to or sold through any livestock market. The representative may inspect all livestock that is offered for sale and may prohibit the movement of any animals that in the representative's opinion are diseased or that are likely to be carriers of disease, until final inspection is made by a qualified, accredited veterinarian, as to their condition. If, upon examination, an infectious, contagious or communicable disease or infestation is found, such animals may be sold only for immediate slaughter to a recognized slaughterer where veterinary inspection is maintained; or, the owner may, upon submission of an affidavit of ownership for at least sixty (60) days prior to sale date, return them to the original premises, where a strict quarantine must be maintained. The representative shall also issue or cause to be issued all necessary quarantines for such animals as are sold for immediate slaughter or are returned to the original premises. A copy of the quarantine shall be sent to the state veterinarian immediately following issuance, and instructions given the owner that the truck moving the quarantined animals to slaughter or returning them to the original premises must be cleaned and disinfected before being used again to transport livestock. The representative shall supervise the cleaning and disinfecting of the yards and pens at such time as may be necessary, using only those disinfectants approved by the animal disease eradication branch of the agricultural research service of the United States department of agriculture.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 9; T.C.A., § 44-2307; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 13.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment deleted the (a) designation, in former (a), substituted “Each livestock market may be” for “Each community sale shall be” at the beginning of the first sentence, substituted “livestock market” for “community sale” at the end of the second sentence, substituted “shall” for “may” twice in the third sentence; and deleted former (b)-(e) which read: “(b) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no female cattle or bulls more than eight (8) months of age shall be removed from the premises where the community sale is conducted, except for immediate slaughter within ten (10) days, unless such cattle either:“(1) Have been tested for brucellosis and found negative within thirty (30) days prior to date of sale, and are accompanied by a certificate of health showing the results of the test;“(2) Are under thirty (30) months of age and were officially vaccinated against brucellosis with vaccine approved by the commissioner at not less than four (4) months nor more than eight (8) months of age, are positively identified and are accompanied by an official certificate of vaccination or have the official calfhood vaccination tattoo in the ear; or“(3) Are in a certified brucellosis-free herd at the time of the sale, and are accompanied by an official certificate of health so certifying.“Cattle that do not come within the above classifications must be tested and found negative to a brucellosis test before being released from the community sale yard. The owner may, upon submission of an affidavit of ownership for at least sixty (60) days prior to sale date, return the cattle to the original premises, and the entire herd placed under quarantine until tested for brucellosis.“(c) All female cattle are classed as breeding cattle, and as such must comply with the requirements governing breeding cattle.“(d) Community sales handling livestock during inclement weather shall be equipped with facilities for housing the livestock during the inclement weather. If livestock is held on the premises for more than ten (10) hours, then facilities for feeding and watering the livestock so held shall be provided.“(e) In case any community sale sells livestock by weight, the scales upon which the livestock is weighed shall be regularly inspected and tested.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Cross-References. Cruelty to animals, § 39-14-202.
Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
44-11-108. Records of operator.
-
Each operator of a livestock market shall keep the following records for each lot of livestock consigned to or sold through such livestock market, namely:
- The name and address of the consignor;
-
- A description of the livestock which shall include ear tag number or back tag number, or animal descriptors such as livestock sex, color, marking, or weight; and
- The date the livestock was received and sold;
- The name and address of the purchaser of the livestock; and
- The price for which the livestock was sold or exchanged and the commission or other fees charged by the livestock market, including such inspection fees as are required hereunder.
- These records shall be kept by the operator of a livestock market at the establishment or premises where the sale is held and conducted or such other convenient place as may be approved by the department. They shall be open for inspection by all officers or inspectors charged with the enforcement of this law, and they shall be preserved and retained for a period of at least two (2) years.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 8; T.C.A., § 44-2308; Acts 2010, ch. 717, §§ 14, 15.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment substituted “livestock market” for “community sale” twice in the introductory paragraph of (a), once in (a)(4) and once in (b); and rewrote (a)(2) which read: “A description of the livestock, which may be by tag number, marking, or weight;”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-11-109. Sale or traffic in livestock on public property near licensed premises unlawful.
It is unlawful to sell, or offer to sell, to buy, or offer to buy, livestock within two thousand (2,000) feet of a licensed livestock market property.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 6; T.C.A., § 44-2309; Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 16.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment substituted “within two thousand (2,000) feet of a licensed livestock market property” for “on any public property located within two thousand feet (2,000) of the premises where licensed community sales are held”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
44-11-110. Administration of chapter — Personnel.
- The state veterinarian shall administer this chapter.
- The state veterinarian is authorized to employ a chief inspector and shall have one (1) inspector assigned to work in each grand division of the state. In addition, the state veterinarian may employ part-time inspectors who may be assigned in particular localities or at particular community sales.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 11; T.C.A., § 44-2310.
44-11-111. License fees to be used in administration of chapter.
The license fees collected under this chapter shall be devoted exclusively to its administration and shall be kept in a separate account by the state treasurer, and no part of the fees collected under this chapter shall at any time become a part of the general fund of the state.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 10; T.C.A., § 44-2311.
44-11-112. Rules and regulations.
The department may make reasonable rules and regulations for carrying out this chapter.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 13; T.C.A., § 44-2312.
44-11-113. Inspections authorized.
For the purpose of carrying out this chapter and making inspections under this chapter, the commissioner or the commissioner's duly authorized representative has the right to enter the establishment or premises where any community sale is held and to inspect its records at all times.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 13; T.C.A., § 44-2313.
44-11-114. Certain businesses excepted.
This chapter shall not apply to the business of buying or assembling livestock for the purpose of prompt shipment to or slaughter in any livestock market or packing house where veterinary inspection is regularly maintained under the animal disease eradication branch of the agricultural research services, United States department of agriculture.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 12; T.C.A., § 44-2314.
44-11-115. Violations of chapter — Penalty.
Any livestock operator, or any person who engages in business as a livestock market without a license, as herein required, or who violates any of the provisions of this chapter, or any rules and regulations lawfully issued hereunder, commits a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1957, ch. 208, § 14; T.C.A. § 44-2315; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 2010, ch. 717, § 17.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment rewrote this section which read: “A person who operates a community sale without a license, as herein required, or who violates any of the provisions of this chapter, or any rules and regulations lawfully issued hereunder, commits a Class C misdemeanor. Each day upon which livestock is sold or exchanged at any community sale constitutes a separate offense.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Collateral References.
Extent of liability of seller of livestock infected with communicable disease. 14 A.L.R.4th 1096.
44-11-116. Injunction.
Whenever it appears to the commissioner that any person has engaged or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of this chapter or any rule hereunder, the commissioner may, in the commissioner's discretion, bring an action in the chancery court of any county in this state to enjoin the acts or practices and to enforce compliance with this chapter or any rule hereunder.
Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 18.
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 21. June 30, 2010.
Chapter 12
Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act [Repealed]
44-12-101. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 — 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 — 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3; Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15), concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-102. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 — 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 — 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3; Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-103. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-104. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-105. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-106. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 — 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 — 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-107. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-108. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-109. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-110. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
44-12-111. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 12, §§ 44-12-101 - 44-12-111 (Acts 1967, ch. 323, § 1-6; T.C.A., § 44-2401 -- 44-2406, §§ 7-9, 11; T.C.A., § 44-2411; Acts 1972, ch. 724, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-2408, Acts 1974, ch. 523, § 1; T.C.A. 44-2409; Acts 1976, ch. 806, § 1(81); T.C.A. 2407; Acts 1980, ch. 767, § 3;Acts 1988, ch. 1013, § 15 concerning the “Tennessee Public Livestock Market Charter Act”, was repealed by Acts 2010, ch. 717, § 20, effective June 30, 2010.
Chapter 13
Certification Of Livestock [Transferred]
Chapter 14
Sheep Producers' Indemnity Law
44-14-101. Short title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Sheep Producers' Indemnity Law.”
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 2; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.2 (Williams, § 3830.4); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2101.
Comparative Legislation. Sheep producers:
Ark. Code § 2-34-101 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 246.260.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 270.170.
Va. Code § 3.1-723 et seq.
Collateral References. Agriculture 6.
44-14-102. Chapter definitions.
-
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Association” means any association or corporation organized under this chapter;
- “Member” includes bona fide sheep producers who meet the requirements of associations organized under this chapter; and
- “Person” includes an individual, firm, partnership, corporation and association.
- Associations organized hereunder shall be deemed “nonprofit,” inasmuch as they are not organized to make profit for themselves, as such, or for their members, as such, but only for their members as producers.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 2; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.3 (Williams, § 3830.4); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2102.
44-14-103. Who may organize.
Five (5) or more persons, a majority of whom are residents of this state, engaged in the production of sheep, may form a nonprofit cooperative protective association, without capital stock under this chapter.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.4 (Williams, § 3830.5); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2103.
44-14-104. Powers and limitations of association.
Each association organized hereunder has the following powers and limitations:
- Indemnity Limited. The indemnity allowed shall in no instance exceed the value of the animal;
- Losses Prior to Membership. The association shall not protect the member from losses occurring prior to membership in the association;
- Losses While Member in Arrears. The association shall not indemnify a member for losses sustained while the member is in arrears in payment of membership fees, but the member shall be considered to be suspended and without protection until the fees are paid, but shall continue to be liable for all fees due the association;
- Loss Caused by Design of Assured. The association shall not be responsible for any loss caused by the design of the assured;
- Liability for Assessment. No member shall be liable for assessments to pay losses and expenses accruing previous to the time of the member's membership in the association, nor for losses and expenses accruing after membership ceases;
- Joint or Concurrent Indemnity. In all cases of other indemnity against loss by dogs upon the sheep protected in the association, whether prior or subsequent to the date of protection in the association, in the event of loss by dogs, the member will not be entitled to recover on the indemnity in the association any greater portion of the loss sustained than the indemnity in the association shall bear to the whole amount of indemnity on the sheep;
- Must Cover All Sheep. The member shall schedule for indemnity all the sheep that the member owns within the territory of the association that are one (1) year of age and over. Lambs produced from ewes insured in the association shall be protected according to the schedule of indemnity payments until one (1) year of age, so long as ownership does not change, without the payment of any fees;
- Funds. If, at the end of the fiscal year, there are sufficient funds above and beyond those to be expended for indemnity claims, a reasonable reserve fund shall be set aside; then, if there are still additional funds, the remainder shall be credited to the members pro rata (on a basis as paid into the association) on the ensuing year's fees. If there are not sufficient funds from the fees collected that are available at the end of the fiscal year to pay the indemnity claims as approved in full, then all indemnity payments shall be reduced pro rata;
- Term of Indemnity. All indemnity shall date from the date of issuance of certificate of membership. This indemnity ceases at midnight Central Standard Time (12:00 CST) of the last day of the fiscal year;
- Renewal of Indemnity. Indemnity shall be renewed only when the member pays all protective fees and otherwise fulfills all requirements as stipulated in the bylaws;
- Liability of the Association. The association shall in no instance be liable for loss from other causes than death of sheep caused by dogs;
- Cancellation of Membership. A member may, at any time upon written request to the secretary and the payment of all valid claims against the member, have the member's membership in the association cancelled;
- Cancellation of Indemnity. The association may, upon five (5) days' notice, for any cause deemed sufficient by the board of directors or its representatives, cancel the indemnity of any member or any part thereof; and
-
Additional Powers. The association has the power to:
- Do each and everything necessary, suitable or proper for the accomplishment of any one (1) of the purposes or the attainment of any one (1) of the subjects herein enumerated, or conducive to or expedient for the interest or benefit of the association, and to contract accordingly;
- Exercise and possess all powers, rights and privileges necessary or incidental to the purposes for which the association is organized or to the activities in which it is engaged; and
- Have any other rights, powers and privileges granted by the laws of this state to other corporations, except such as are inconsistent with the express provisions of this chapter.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 4; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.5 (Williams, § 3830.6); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2104.
44-14-105. Members.
- Under the terms and conditions prescribed in the bylaws adopted by it, the association may admit as members only persons engaged in the production of sheep, including the lessees and tenants of land used for the production of sheep, and any lessors and landlords who receive as rent all or any part of the sheep, or returns therefrom, raised on the leased premises.
- If a member of the association is other than a natural person, the member may be represented by any individual, associate officer or manager or member thereof, duly authorized in writing.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 5; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.6 (Williams, § 3830.7); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2105.
44-14-106. Articles of incorporation.
-
Each association formed under this chapter must prepare and file articles of incorporation setting forth:
- The name of the association;
- The purpose for which it is formed;
- The place where its principal business will be transacted;
- The term for which it is to exist, not exceeding fifty (50) years; and
-
- The number of directors of the association, which must be not less than five (5) and may be any number in excess of five (5);
- The term of office of such directors; and
- The names and addresses of those who are to serve as incorporating directors for the first term, and/or until the election and qualification of their successors.
- The articles must be subscribed by the incorporators and acknowledged before an officer authorized by the law of this state to take and certify acknowledgments of deeds and conveyances, and shall be filed in accordance with the general incorporation laws of this state.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 6; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.7 (Williams, § 3830.8); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2106.
44-14-107. Amendments to articles of incorporation.
The articles of incorporation may be altered or amended at any regular meeting or any special meeting called for that purpose. An amendment must first be approved by two thirds (2/3) of the directors and then be adopted by a vote representing a majority of all the members of the association. Amendments to the articles of incorporation, when so adopted, shall be filed in accordance with the general corporation laws of this state.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 7; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.8 (Williams, § 3830.9); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2107.
Cross-References. Corporations, title 48.
44-14-108. Bylaws.
- Each association incorporated under this chapter must, within thirty (30) days after its incorporation, adopt for its government and management, a code of bylaws not inconsistent with the powers granted under this chapter. A majority vote of the members, or their written assent, is necessary to adopt bylaws.
-
Each association, under its bylaws, may provide for any or all of the following matters:
- The number of members constituting a quorum;
- The right of members to vote by proxy or by mail, or both; and the conditions, manner, form and effects of such votes;
- The number of directors constituting a quorum;
- The qualifications, compensation, duties, term of office of directors and officers; the time of their election and mode and manner of giving notice thereof;
- Penalties for violations of the bylaws;
- The amount of entrance, organization and membership fees, if any; the manner and method of collection of the same; and the purpose for which they may be used;
- The amount that each member shall be required to pay annually or from time to time, if at all, to carry on the business of the association; the charge, if any, to be paid by each member for service rendered by the association to that member and the time of payment and manner of collection; and
- The number and qualification of members of the association and the conditions precedent to membership; the method, time, and manner of permitting members to withdraw; the manner of assignment and transfer of the interest of members; the conditions upon which and the time when the membership of any member shall cease; the automatic suspension of the rights of a member when the member ceases to be eligible to membership in the association; the mode, manner and effect of the expulsion of a member; the manner of determining the value of a member's interest and provision for its purchase by the association upon the death or withdrawal of the member, or upon the expulsion of a member for forfeiture of membership, or, at the option of the association, the purchase of the member's interest at a price fixed by conclusive appraisal of the board of directors. In case of the withdrawal or expulsion of a member, the board of directors shall equitably and conclusively appraise the member's property and property interests in the association and fix the amount of the property and property interests in money, which shall be paid to the member within one (1) year after expulsion.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 8; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.9 (Williams, § 3830.10); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2108.
44-14-109. General and special meetings — Calling — Notice.
- In its bylaws, each association shall provide for one (1) or more regular meetings each year.
- The board of directors shall have the right to call a special meeting at any time; and ten percent (10%) of the members may file a petition stating the specific business to be brought before the association and demand a special meeting at any time.
- Such meetings must thereupon be called by the directors. Notice of all meetings, together with a statement of the purposes thereof, shall be mailed to each member at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting; provided, that the bylaws may require instead that such notice may be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation, published at the principal place of business of the association.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 9; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.10 (Williams, § 3830.11); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2109.
44-14-110. Directors — Election — Compensation — Vacancies.
- The affairs of the association shall be managed by a board of not less than five (5) directors elected by the members from their own number. The bylaws may provide that one (1) or more additional directors may be appointed by any public official or commission or by the other directors selected by the members or their delegates. The additional directors shall represent primarily the interest of the general public in such associations. The directors so appointed need not be members of the association, but shall have the same powers and rights as other directors. These directors shall not number more than one fifth (1/5) of the entire number of directors.
- An association may provide a fair remuneration for the time actually spent by its officers and directors in its service and for the service of the members of its executive committee.
- The bylaws may provide that no director shall occupy any position in the association, except that of president and secretary at a regular salary or substantially full-time pay.
- The bylaws may provide for an executive committee and may allot to the committee all the functions and powers of the board, subject to the general direction and control of the board.
- When a vacancy on the board occurs other than by expiration of term, the remaining members of the board, by a majority vote, shall fill the vacancy.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 10; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.11 (Williams, § 3830.12); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2110.
44-14-111. Election of officers.
The directors shall elect from their number a president and one (1) or more vice presidents. They shall also elect a secretary and a treasurer, who need not be directors or members of the association; and they may combine the two (2) latter offices and designate the combined office as secretary-treasurer, or unite both functions and titles in one person. The treasurer may be a bank or any depository, and as such, shall not be considered as an officer, but as an agency of the board. In such case, the secretary shall perform the usual accounting duties of the treasurer, except that the funds shall be deposited only as and where authorized by the board.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 11; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.12 (Williams, § 3830.13); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2111.
44-14-112. Bonding officers, employees, and agents.
Every officer, employee and agent handling funds or negotiable instruments or property of or for any association created under this chapter shall be required to execute and deliver a bond for the faithful performance of that person's duties and obligations.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 12; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.13 (Williams, § 3830.14); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2112.
44-14-113. Membership certification — Issuance — Voting — Liability.
- When a member of an association has paid the membership fee in full, and has also paid the prescribed protective fees, the member shall receive a certificate of membership. The promissory notes of the members may be accepted by the association as full or partial payment of fees.
- No member shall be liable for the debts of the association to an amount exceeding the sum remaining unpaid on the membership fee or the prescribed protective fees, including any unpaid balance on any promissory notes given in payment of such fees.
- No member shall be entitled to more than one (1) vote, regardless of the number of sheep owned by such member.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 13; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.14 (Williams, § 3830.15); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2113.
44-14-114. Removal of officer or director.
Any member may bring charges against an officer or director by filing them in writing with the secretary of the association, together with a petition signed by five percent (5%) of the members, requesting the removal of the officer or director in question. The removal shall be voted upon at the next regular or special meeting of the association and, by a vote of a majority of the members, the association may remove the officer or director and fill the vacancy. The officer or director, against whom such charges have been brought, shall be informed in writing of the charges previous to the meeting and shall have an opportunity at the meeting to be heard in person or by counsel and to present witnesses; and the person or persons bringing the charges against the officer or director shall have the same opportunity.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 14; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.15 (Williams, § 3830.16); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2114.
44-14-115. Annual reports.
Each association formed under this chapter shall prepare and make out an annual report on forms to be furnished by the commissioner of commerce and insurance, containing:
- The name of the association;
- Its principal place of business;
- A general statement of its business operations during the fiscal year, showing the number of members, amount of membership fees received, and the amount of prescribed protective fees received;
- The total expenses of operations;
- The amount of its indebtedness or liability;
- Its balance sheets; and
- Such other information as may be required by the commissioner.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 15; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.16 (Williams, § 3830.17); impl. am. Acts 1971, ch. 137, § 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2115.
44-14-116. Conflicting laws not to apply.
Any provisions of law that are in conflict with this chapter shall be construed as not applying to the associations provided for in this chapter.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 16; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.17 (Williams, § 3830.18); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2116.
44-14-117. Application of general corporation laws.
- The general corporation laws of this state, and the powers and rights under those laws, shall apply to the associations organized under this chapter, except where those provisions are in conflict with or inconsistent with the express provisions of this chapter.
- None of the provisions of the general insurance laws of the state shall apply to any association or corporation organized under this chapter, except that the department of commerce and insurance shall act in a supervisory capacity and shall be authorized to make an inspection and investigation of the associations' or corporations' books and activities, and may require any reports from the associations or corporations that, in the judgment of the commissioner, are deemed to the best interest of the public.
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 18; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.18 (Williams, § 3830.20); impl. am. Acts 1971, ch. 137, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2117.
44-14-118. Filing fees.
For filing articles of incorporation an association organized under this chapter shall pay five dollars ($5.00); and for filing an amendment to the articles, two dollars ($2.00).
Acts 1939, ch. 184, § 19; C. Supp. 1950, § 3830.19 (Williams, § 3830.21); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-2118.
Chapter 15
Tennessee Apiary Act of 1995
44-15-101. Title — Purpose.
- This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Tennessee Apiary Act of 1995.”
- Honeybees are kept in beehives by beekeepers throughout the state, and many colonies of feral honeybees have established nests in hollow trees and in walls of buildings. These honeybees perform a pollination function that is essential to the propagation of many species of flowering plants in Tennessee. These flowering plants include many agricultural crops, wildflowers, and forest plants that are of great importance to all Tennesseans, and the honeybees are the major pollinator for most of these plants. Therefore, the state should take appropriate actions to help assure the continued availability of an adequate population of honeybee pollinators. Honeybees, like other animal species, are afflicted by a variety of contagious diseases and pests that can cause serious population reductions. The natural behavior of honeybees cause them to be interactive with bees from other colonies and therefore vulnerable to transmission of some diseases and pests. Therefore, persons involved in the keeping of bees in a given area can engage in beekeeping practices that will have a real and direct impact on the honeybees and beekeeping in surrounding areas. This chapter enables and provides for the development of regulatory programs for beekeeping activities in the state as may be needed to help protect honeybees from diseases, pests, and other threats that could seriously reduce the availability of the honeybee pollinators.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 2; T.C.A. § 44-15-201.
Compiler's Notes. Former chapter 15, §§ 44-15-101 — 44-15-115 (Acts 1961, ch. 39, §§ 1 — 15; T.C.A., §§ 44-2201 — 44-2215; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113), concerning the Tennessee apiary laws, were repealed by Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 1.
Former chapter 15, part 2, §§ 44-15-201 — 44-15-223, were transferred to §§ 44-15-101 — 44-15-123, respectively, in 2000.
Cross-References. Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
Attorney General Opinions. Homeowners’ association’s restrictive covenants on beekeeping. OAG 13-02, 2013 Tenn. AG LEXIS 2 (1/7/13).
Comparative Legislation. Apiaries:
Ala. Code § 2-14-1 et seq.
Ark. Code § 2-22-101 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 2-14-40 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 252.170 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 69-25-101 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 264.011 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 106-634 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-610.1 et seq.
Collateral References.
Keeping bees as nuisance. 88 A.L.R.3d 992.
Liability for injury or damage caused by bees. 86 A.L.R.3d 829.
Validity and construction of beekeeping regulation. 55 A.L.R.4th 1223.
Agriculture 2.
44-15-102. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Abandoned apiaries” means an apiary that has not been subjected to at least the minimal beekeeping practices necessary to maintain the bees in a healthy, productive, and safe condition so that the honeybees and beekeepers in surrounding areas will not be adversely affected;
- “Advisory committee” or “ATAC” means the apicultural technical advisory committee that is established pursuant to this chapter;
- “Apiary” means a collection of one (1) or more colonies of bees in beehives at a location. A building or room in a building is considered to be the location of an apiary only if one (1) or more beehives containing colonies of honeybees are housed within that building;
- “Apiary inspectors” means those persons with relevant qualifications and beekeeping training who are employed by or working under contract with the department of agriculture for the purpose of implementing regulatory programs as directed by the state apiarist;
- “Appliances” means any apparatus, tools, machines or other devices used in handling and manipulating bees, honey, and wax that may be used in an apiary, or in transporting bees and their products and apiary supplies;
- “Bee disease or pest” means a condition in which a colony is infested/infected with a bacterial, fungal, viral, or parasitic condition or an organism that can or will affect the well-being of a colony;
- “Beekeeper” means any individual, association, corporation, or other entity who deliberately provides nesting sites for colonies of honeybees and attempts to establish and maintain colonies of honeybees at any location;
- “Bees” or “honeybees” means any developmental stage of any sub- species of the species Apis mellifem;
- “Certification” means a voluntary training program approved by the department that when successfully completed authorizes the beekeeper to detect, identify, and control regulated bee diseases and pests in colonies under the management of that beekeeper;
- “Certified beekeeper” means any person who has successfully met the requirements of a voluntary certification program for beekeepers as approved by the state apiarist;
- “Colony” means all of the bees living together as one (1) social unit and may include the bee equipment in which the bees are living;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture or the commissioner's designated agent;
- “Department” means the Tennessee department of agriculture;
- “Feral bees” means those honeybees not kept in a beehive provided by a beekeeper and whose nest sites are usually located in a cavity within a tree or a building;
- “Hive” or “beehive” means that container or structure used by a beekeeper to provide a cavity in which a colony of bees is expected to establish a permanent nest;
- “Registered apiary” means an apiary location that has been properly registered with the department as required by this chapter;
- “Registered beekeeper” means a beekeeper whose apiaries are properly registered with the department;
- “Regulated bee disease” or “regulated pest” means a bee disease or pest that presents a significant threat to the population of honeybees and for which regulatory actions can be taken to mitigate that threat; and
- “State apiarist” means that person employed by the department who has the qualifications prescribed by this chapter and has been designated as state apiarist by the commissioner.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 3; T.C.A. § 44-15-202.
44-15-103. State apiarist.
-
- The commissioner shall appoint a state apiarist, subject to any applicable rules or qualifications established by the department of human resources. The state apiarist is responsible for the apiary work of the department of agriculture and, with the necessary assistants, is charged with the duty of enforcing this chapter. The person designated as state apiarist shall have, as a minimum, a college degree in one (1) of the biological sciences and a minimum of five (5) years apiary experience.
- The state apiarist is responsible for developing, implementing, and administering the apiary program needed to satisfy the objectives and provisions of this chapter, and shall have the duty of enforcing those rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter.
- The commissioner may appoint, in accordance with any applicable personnel rules and regulations, such assistants, apiary inspectors, and other employees as may be required, and to prescribe their duties; to delegate to apiary inspectors and other employees such powers and authority as may be deemed proper within the limits of the power and authority conferred upon the commissioner by this chapter.
- The state apiarist and the apiary inspectors may provide educational literature and may conduct training programs for beekeeping on topics related to prevention, detection, and control of bee diseases and pests and other topics that will help beekeepers maintain needed populations of honeybees. The literature and training programs may be developed and conducted in cooperation with the extension apiculturist at the University of Tennessee.
- The state apiarist and all apiary inspectors may own colonies of bees and engage in beekeeping activities on their own time, and their beekeeping activities will be subject to the same rules and regulations as applied to all other beekeepers. The department shall not prohibit such activities but may develop guidelines to avoid interference with work responsibilities and to prevent conflicts of interest.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 4; T.C.A. § 44-15-203.
Compiler's Notes. Pursuant to Acts 2007, ch. 60, references to the department of personnel were changed to the department of human resources, effective April 24, 2007.
44-15-104. Cooperative agreements.
The commissioner is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements and/or grants with any person, municipality, county and other departments of this state, and boards, officials and authorities of other states and the United States for inspection with reference to infectious and contagious diseases and regulated pests of honeybees, and for their control and eradication.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 5; T.C.A. § 44-15-204.
44-15-105. Registration of apiaries.
- Every beekeeper owning one (1) or more colonies of bees shall register each apiary location by January 1, 1996, and every three (3) years thereafter. Upon establishment of a new apiary location, it is the duty of the owners or operators of the apiary to register the new locations within thirty (30) days. Any person, firm, or corporation moving bees into the state shall register all apiary locations within thirty (30) days from the date of the establishment of each apiary.
- If an unregistered apiary is found, the state apiarist or any apiary inspector shall make a reasonable effort to locate the owner of the bees and notify the beekeeper by means of a registered letter of the registration requirements and the consequences of noncompliance.
- The state apiarist shall issue to each beekeeper with one (1) or more registered apiaries a unique registration number that will be used for apiary identification purposes.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 6; T.C.A. § 44-15-205.
Cross-References. Certified mail in lieu of registered mail, § 1-3-111.
44-15-106. Moveable frames.
Each beekeeper is required to provide moveable frames in all hives used by that beekeeper to contain bees, so that any such frame can be removed from the hive and inspected for any regulated diseases and pests. Any beekeeper having a colony of bees living in any beehive or other container that does not have moveable frames may be ordered by the state apiarist to transfer the bees into a hive with moveable frames within a specified period of time. If the beekeeper does not make the transfer within the specified time period, the state apiarist shall have the authority to confiscate the bees and hive or hives.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 7; T.C.A. § 44-15-206.
44-15-107. Inspection program.
The state apiarist, assisted by the apiary inspectors identified in this chapter, has the authority and responsibility to establish and implement a program for inspection of apiaries throughout the state for the purpose of detecting regulated bee diseases and pests and for implementing control measures as needed to minimize the adverse impacts of those diseases and pests on the honeybee population in the state. The apiary inspection program will be conducted in accordance with standard procedures that are developed by the state apiarist. The state apiarist may require or supervise the treatment, destruction, or disposition of diseased bees or contaminated bee equipment or bee supplies in accordance with rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of this chapter. Any apiary inspector duly authorized by the state apiarist has the authority to go upon any public or private property for the purpose of conducting an inspection of an apiary located on that property. The inspector shall make a reasonable effort to notify the beekeeper of a planned inspection prior to the actual inspection.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 8; 1999, ch. 192, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-15-207.
44-15-108. Sale or movement of bees.
- No bees may be sold, offered for sale, moved, or transported, shipped or delivered within the state, unless they have been inspected by an appropriate official of the state and certified to be apparently free of infectious or contagious regulated bee diseases and pests in accordance with rules and regulations promulgated under this chapter.
- All persons desiring to move bees, hives, slumgums, used beekeeping equipment or appliances into the state must apply to the department for a permit. The application shall be accompanied by a certificate of health certifying that all bees, hives, slumgums, used beekeeping equipment or appliances have been inspected by an authorized official within thirty (30) days prior to transportation into Tennessee, and that the bees, hives, slumgums, used beekeeping equipment or appliances were found apparently free from any regulated diseases or pest.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 9; T.C.A. § 44-15-208.
44-15-109. Duty to report disease or pest — Authority to inspect.
- If a beekeeper knows that a colony of bees has a regulated bee disease or pest, the beekeeper shall immediately report to a state apiary inspector all facts known about the bee's disease or bee's pests.
- If any apiary inspector has substantial reason to believe that a feral colony of bees may be harboring any regulated bee disease or pest, the inspector has the authority to enter onto any property, public or private, to locate and examine that feral colony of bees. The examination of a feral colony and any subsequent regulatory activity must be conducted in accordance with rules established by the department.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 10; T.C.A. § 44-15-209.
44-15-110. Quarantine—Unlawful to expose free-flying honeybees to disease, pest, or any substance known to kill bees.
- The state apiarist and the duly authorized apiary inspectors have the power and authority to declare a quarantine on any apiary found to be infected/infested with any regulated bee diseases or pests. Immediately after the apiary is declared to be infected/infested, a quarantine notice will be presented to the beekeeper and will include specific instructions as to required actions by the beekeeper. The appliances directly associated with that apiary shall be under quarantine and shall be subject to regulatory actions imposed by the department. The commissioner may declare a geographical area quarantine against any county, group of counties, region, or state where a regulated bee disease or pest is found in a sufficient number of apiaries that the infestation can be considered endemic. However, bees may not be moved from the quarantine area except by permission from the state apiarist or an apiary inspector.
-
It is unlawful for any person in the state to participate in or conduct a deliberate act that exposes free-flying honeybees to a known source of any regulated bee disease or pest or to any substance commonly known to kill bees. This section does not apply to farmers, gardeners, or others who are using legally registered pesticides in strict compliance with the label instructions. The deliberate acts that are prohibited include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Placing in a location that is accessible to free-flying honeybees any beeswax combs, beekeeping equipment, honey, or other substance known to be attractive to honeybees and capable of transmitting bee diseases or pests and known to have been in contact with or associated with sources of regulated bee diseases or pests;
- Placing in a location that is accessible to free-flying honeybees any honey, sugar syrup, corn syrup, or other substance known to be attractive to bees and to which some pesticide or other substance harmful to honeybees has been added; or
- Producing, making, releasing, or otherwise causing any spray, smoke, fog, dust, or other substances to enter a beehive for the purpose of killing the bees therein except as requested by the owner of the bees or as required by a state regulatory order.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 11; T.C.A. § 44-15-210.
Compiler's Notes. This section is set out in this supplement to update the section heading.
44-15-111. Certification program.
- The department may authorize establishment of a certification program whereby beekeepers who successfully complete the requirements of the program will be certified to have demonstrated the knowledge and skills needed to effectively detect, identify, and control regulated bee diseases and pests. The state apiarist will develop and administer any regulatory certification program that is established.
- The beekeeper certification program shall be a voluntary program, and any applicant must successfully complete the program requirements to become a certified beekeeper. Each person who becomes certified will be granted certain privileges with regard to regulatory requirements promulgated pursuant to this chapter.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 12; T.C.A. § 44-15-211.
44-15-112. Used beekeeping equipment.
No person shall sell or give to any other person any used beekeeping equipment until the equipment has been sanitized by a method approved by the state apiarist. This requirement will not apply to equipment that is occupied by live bees.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 13; T.C.A. § 44-15-212.
44-15-113. Entry permit — Inspection certificates.
- Any person wanting to move live bees in beehives or empty brood combs (combs that have been used for rearing bee brood) into the state must apply to the department for an entry permit. The application shall be accompanied by a certificate of health from the originating state's regulatory agency certifying that all bees and beehives and used brood combs have been inspected by an authorized official thirty (30) days prior to transportation into Tennessee. The certificate of health must show what diseases and pests were found as a result of the inspection. The state apiarist shall review the application and the health certificate and will determine whether or not an entry permit shall be granted and what conditions or requirements must be met prior to entry.
- Any person, firm or corporation transporting colonies or used beekeeping equipment into, within, or through the state must secure the hives and equipment in such a manner as to prevent the escape of bees.
- The state apiarist and all apiary inspectors shall be empowered to intercept any person or persons transporting colonies or appliances to determine if the person or persons have the required inspection certificates.
- Colonies, beehives, slumgums, used bee equipment or appliances brought into this state in violation of this chapter or any applicable rules and regulations of the department shall be removed by the owner from this state and returned to their state of origin within five (5) days after notification by the department. Failure to comply may result in confiscation as provided in § 44-15-117 without any remuneration to the owner.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 14; T.C.A. § 44-15-213.
44-15-114. Penalty.
Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter or the rules and regulations made under this chapter, or of any order or notice given pursuant thereto, or who shall forge, counterfeit, destroy, or wrongfully or fraudulently use, any certificate, permit, notice or other like document provided or who impedes, hinders or otherwise prevents, or attempts to prevent, the commissioner or the commissioner's duly authorized agent from performing the official's duty in connection with this chapter, may, in a lawful proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, be assessed a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 15; T.C.A. § 44-15-214.
44-15-115. Disposition of funds.
All fees, fines, and proceeds resulting from the sale of seized properties collected under this chapter shall be paid into the general fund and the same are appropriated exclusively to the department to be used in carrying out this chapter.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 16; T.C.A. § 44-15-215.
44-15-116. Experimental apiaries.
The state apiarist is empowered to establish or to authorize establishment of apiaries for experimental purposes associated with research on or evaluation of conditions related to any bee disease or pest.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 17; T.C.A. § 44-15-216.
44-15-117. Disposition of confiscated bees and beehives.
All bees and beehives confiscated by the state apiarist as allowed by this chapter shall be destroyed by burning if the state apiarist determines that the confiscated property is infested with a regulated disease or pest to such an extent that it presents a significant and unacceptable threat to bees in the surrounding area. The state apiarist is allowed to use or to authorize use of confiscated property for experimental purposes. Otherwise the property may be donated to any college or university within the state that requests the property for research or educational purposes or disposed of at the discretion of the commissioner.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 18; T.C.A. § 44-15-217.
44-15-118. Preventive measures.
After inspection of infected/infested bees or fixtures, or handling diseased bees, the state apiarist or assistants, before leaving the premises on which disease is found, or proceeding to any other apiary, shall take such measures as to prevent the spread of the disease or pests by infected/infested material adhering to that person's or persons' body or clothing, or any tools or appliances used by the state apiarist or any assistants that have come in contact with infected/infested materials.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 19; T.C.A. § 44-15-218.
44-15-119. Unlawful activities.
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly give false or misleading information in any matter pertaining to the enforcement of this chapter, or to resist, impede, or hinder the state apiarist or any duly authorized apiary inspector in the discharge of duties as described in this chapter.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 20; T.C.A. § 44-15-219.
44-15-120. Honey storage and handling.
- Honey can be contaminated with certain organisms that can cause disease in honeybees. Therefore, honey containers and beekeeping equipment that are wet with honey shall be stored, transported, and handled in such a way that free-flying honeybees will not be able to gain access to that honey.
- No candy or other food containing honey shall be used in queen mailing cages.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 21; T.C.A. § 44-15-220.
44-15-121. Previous rules and regulations revoked — Authority to promulgate new rules.
- All rules and regulations previously promulgated on the subject matter of this chapter are revoked.
- The department shall promulgate rules and regulations pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 22; T.C.A. § 44-15-221.
44-15-122. Charges.
In order to recover departmental costs, the commissioner is authorized to charge for the use of equipment and materials in providing technical assistance to beekeepers.
Acts 1995, ch. 402, § 24; T.C.A. § 44-15-222.
44-15-123. Indemnity for destruction.
The commissioner may establish procedures for the payment of indemnities for honey bee colonies destroyed under the authority of this chapter. Indemnity under this section is not intended to be a full reimbursement but a partial compensation based on, but not limited to, the value of the colonies and the availability of funds for this purpose. Indemnification may be disallowed if the owner is in violation of this chapter.
Acts 1999, ch. 274, § 1; T.C.A. § 44-15-223.
44-15-124. Restrictions on keeping honeybees in hives.
No county, municipality, consolidated government, or other political subdivision of this state shall adopt or continue in effect any ordinance or resolution prohibiting the establishment or maintenance of honeybees in hives, provided that such establishment or maintenance is in compliance with this chapter. This section shall not be construed to restrict or otherwise limit the zoning authority of county or municipal governments; provided, however, that a honeybee hive being maintained at a location in compliance with applicable zoning requirements on June 10, 2011, shall not be adversely affected and may be maintained at the same location notwithstanding any subsequent zoning changes.
Acts 2011, ch. 463, § 1.
Code Commission Notes.
Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 1 purported to enact a new § 44-15-124. Section 44-15-124 was previously enacted by Acts 2011, ch. 463, § 1; therefore the enactment by Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 1 was designated as § 44-15-125 by the code commission.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 463, § 2. June 10, 2011.
Attorney General Opinions. Homeowners’ association’s restrictive covenants on beekeeping. OAG 13-02, 2013 Tenn. AG LEXIS 2 (1/7/13).
44-15-125. Liability for personal injury or property damage.
-
Any person who has registered an apiary pursuant to § 44-15-105, is otherwise in compliance with this part and operates such apiary in a reasonable manner shall not be liable for any personal injury or property damage that is caused by the keeping and maintaining of:
- Bee equipment, queen breeding equipment, apiaries, affiliated appliances that are located on such apiary; or
- Bees that nest in a beehive that is located on such apiary.
- The limitation of liability established by this section shall not apply to intentional tortious conduct or acts or omissions constituting gross negligence.
Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 1.
Code Commission Notes.
Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 1 purported to enact a new § 44-15-124. Section 44-15-124 was previously enacted by Acts 2011, ch. 463, § 1; therefore, the enactment by Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 1 was designated as § 44-15-125 by the code commission.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 474, § 2. July 1, 2011.
Chapter 16
Baby Chicks
Part 1
General Provisions
44-16-101. Hatchery and baby chick inspection service — Rules and regulations — Trademarks — Inspection fees.
The department of agriculture shall organize, under the division of animal disease control, a poultry hatchery and baby chick inspection service, and the commissioner of agriculture shall prescribe such rules and regulations in conformity with recognized standards and establish such trademarks as may be necessary or proper to effect this service, and fix reasonable inspection fees to provide for the expense of the service.
Acts 1925, ch. 138, § 1; Shan. Supp., § 373a77; Code 1932, § 300; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1801.
Cross-References. Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
Comparative Legislation. Hatcheries and baby chicks:
Ala. Code § 2-16-1 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 4-7-1 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 257.320 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 69-7-201 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 196.313.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 106-539 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-763.14 et seq.
Collateral References. Animals 29.
44-16-102. Certification as accredited flock and hatchery.
Each poultry flock inspected and meeting the standard requirements thus fixed shall be certified by the department as an accredited flock, and each hatchery using eggs from accredited flocks only, and otherwise meeting the standard requirements, shall be certified by the department as an accredited hatchery.
Acts 1925, ch. 138, § 2; Shan. Supp., § 373a78; Code 1932, § 301; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1802.
44-16-103. Inspector of poultry flocks, hatcheries, and baby chicks — Assistants — Compensation.
The commissioner of agriculture is authorized, for the carrying out of this part, to appoint a state poultry flock, hatchery, and baby chick inspector and necessary assistants, and to fix their compensation; provided, that no expense shall be incurred or paid on account of this service in excess of the revenue derived from the service.
Acts 1925, ch. 138, § 3; Shan. Supp., § 373a79; Code 1932, § 302; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1803.
44-16-104. Inspection fees paid into state treasury for expenses — Surplus for poultry education and investigation.
The revenue derived from the inspection fees authorized in § 44-16-101 shall be paid into the state treasury by the commissioner and placed to the credit of a special poultry inspection account, which may be drawn on by the department of agriculture to meet the expenses of the service provided for in this part, and if there should be a surplus remaining, it may be expended by the commissioner for poultry educational and investigational purposes.
Acts 1925, ch. 138, § 4; Shan. Supp., § 373a80; Code 1932, § 303; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1804.
Part 2
Custom Hatching or Producing for Sale
44-16-201. License required.
Every person engaging in the business of custom hatching, producing baby chicks for sale or selling or offering baby chicks for sale either individually or by or through community sale, public pavilions or public auction shall obtain a license from the department for each establishment at which such business is conducted.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 2; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.16 (Williams, § 525.2); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1805.
44-16-202. [Repealed.]
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.17 (Williams, § 525.3); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1806; repealed by Acts 2015, ch. 485, § 23, effective July 1, 2015.
Compiler's Note. Former § 44-16-202 concerned license fee; expiration date; application for license.
44-16-203. Duties of licensees.
Any person coming under this part shall:
- Maintain sanitary measures such as will properly suppress and prevent the spread of contagious and infectious diseases of baby chicks;
- Provide ample facilities for the proper care and handling of baby chicks on the premises;
- Determine that all baby chicks are in a healthy condition before offering them for sale; and
- Label all containers holding baby chicks, when offered for sale as a unit, with the following: number of baby chicks; breed and variety of baby chicks; date hatched; whether or not parent stock has been tested for pullorum disease; cockerels, pullets, or straight run; name and address of producer; and the name and address of the seller.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 4; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.18 (Williams, § 525.4); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1807.
44-16-204. Access to premises — Enforcement by commissioner.
- The commissioner of agriculture or the commissioner's duly authorized agent has free access at all reasonable hours to any place of business coming under this part.
- The commissioner shall enforce this part and has the authority to promulgate regulations for the efficient enforcement of its provisions.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, §§ 5, 6; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.19 (Williams, §§ 525.5, 525.6); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1808.
44-16-205. Part definitions.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Baby chicks” means all domestic fowl six (6) weeks of age or under;
- “Department” means department of agriculture; and
- “Person” includes every person, partnership, firm, company, association, society, public auction, community sale, sale pavilion, syndicate, and corporation.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.15 (Williams, § 525.1); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1809.
44-16-206. Application of law.
This part shall not be construed to include any person who hatches for sale one thousand (1,000) or fewer baby chicks per year.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 7; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.19 (Williams, § 525.7); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1810.
44-16-207. Violation a misdemeanor — Revocation of license.
Any person who violates any of the provisions of this part commits a Class C misdemeanor, but if the violation occurs after a conviction has become final, the person's license shall be revoked.
Acts 1945, ch. 176, § 8; C. Supp. 1950, § 547.20 (Williams, § 525.8); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-1811; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Chapter 17
Dogs and Cats
Part 1
Dog and Cat Dealers
44-17-101. Purpose of part.
The purpose of this part is to protect the owners of dogs and cats from the theft of their pets, to prevent the sale or use of dogs and cats that have been stolen, and to ensure the humane treatment of dogs and cats in commerce and those used in research facilities.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-104.
Cross-References. Farm Animal and Research Facilities Protection Act, title 39, ch. 14, part 8.
Humane treatment of animals not subject to state game and fish laws, § 5-9-110.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 9.
Comparative Legislation. Dogs and cats:
Ala. Code § 3-6-1 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 4-8-1 et seq.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 258.095 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 41-53-1 et seq.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 273.010 et seq.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 67-1 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-796.66 et seq.
Collateral References. 4 Am. Jur. 2d Animals §§ 94-99, 113.
3A C.J.S. Animals § 232.
Animals 4.
44-17-102. Part definitions.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Cat” means any live cat of the species Felis catus;
- “Commerce” means buying or selling or transporting from one (1) place to another in this state;
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
-
- “Dealer” means any person who, for compensation or profit, buys, sells, transports (except as a common carrier), delivers for transportation, or boards dogs or cats for research purposes, or any person who buys or sells twenty-five (25) or more dogs or cats in any one (1) calendar year for resale within the state or for transportation out of the state;
- “Dealer” also means any person who, for compensation or profit, buys from or sells to a private person at a flea market any dog or cat;
- “Dog” means any live dog of the species Canis familiaris;
- “Flea market” means any assemblage of twenty (20) or more persons gathered together at regular or irregular intervals, whether in open air or under cover, for the purpose of buying, selling, or trading merchandise to and from the general public, when this buying, selling, or trading is outside of the regular business or occupation of the majority of persons so gathered, and when the majority of the persons so gathered do not pay a business privilege tax for their activities at the flea market;
- “Person” means any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, or other legal entity; and
- “Research facility” means any school, hospital, laboratory, institution, organization or person that uses or intends to use dogs or cats in research, tests, or experiments and that purchases or transports dogs or cats in commerce.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 2; 1978, ch. 640, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 44-105.
Law Reviews.
Backyard Breeding: Regulatory Nuisance, Crime Precursor, 85 Tenn. L. Rev. 707 (Spring 2018).
44-17-103. Sale or transportation of dogs or cats to research facilities by dealers without license prohibited.
- It is unlawful for any dealer to sell or offer to sell or transport or offer for transportation to any research facility any dog or cat, or to buy, sell, offer to buy or sell, transport or offer for transportation in commerce any dog or cat, unless the dealer has a currently valid license from the commissioner and has complied with the rules and regulations promulgated by the commissioner pursuant to this part.
- A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 3; T.C.A., § 44-106; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Law Reviews.
Tennessee Civil Disabilities: A Systemic Approach (Neil P. Cohen), 41 Tenn. L. Rev. 253.
Cited: State v. Adkisson, — S.W.3d —, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 320 (Tenn. Crim. App. May 2, 2012).
44-17-104. Applications for license — Fee.
- An application for a license as a dealer shall be made to the commissioner on a form provided by the commissioner, which shall contain space for such information as the commissioner may reasonably require, including evidence of ability to comply with such standards, rules and regulations as are lawfully prescribed by the commissioner.
-
Each application for a license shall be accompanied by a license fee based upon the following:
- Dealer license fee to sell dogs or cats to research facilities — two hundred and fifty dollars ($250);
- Dealer license fee (wholesale) to sell dogs or cats for resale — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125);
-
Dealer license fee (retail) to buy dogs or cats for resale to be assessed as follows:
- Transactions of up to 50 animals per year — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125);
- Transactions of 51 to 150 animals per year — two hundred and fifty dollars ($250);
- Transactions of 151 to 300 animals per year — five hundred dollars ($500);
- Transactions of 301 to 500 animals per year — seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750); and
- Transactions of more than 500 animals per year — one thousand dollars ($1,000); and
- Dealer license fee to transport dogs or cats in commerce — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125).
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 4; T.C.A., § 44-107; Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 1.
44-17-105. Issuance of dealer's license — Requirements.
-
The commissioner shall issue a license to an applicant after determining:
- The applicant or the responsible officers of the applicant are of good moral character;
- The applicant or any responsible officer of the applicant has never been convicted of cruelty to animals or of a violation of this part;
- An inspection has been made of the premises and a finding that it conforms to this part and the rules and regulations of the commissioner, and is a suitable place in which to conduct the dealer's business; and
- The dealer's business is to be conducted in a permanent structure or building.
- Each license shall be issued only for the premises and to the person or persons named in the application and shall not be transferable or assignable except with the written approval of the commissioner.
- Licenses shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 5; T.C.A., § 44-108.
Law Reviews.
Tennessee Civil Disabilities: A Systemic Approach (Neil P. Cohen), 41 Tenn. L. Rev. 253.
44-17-106. Annual renewal of dealer's license — Fee.
A license, unless sooner suspended or revoked, shall be renewable annually upon filing by the licensee and approval by the commissioner, of an annual report upon such forms and containing such information as the commissioner may prescribe by regulation. The fee for renewal of licenses shall be based upon the following:
- Dealer license fee to sell dogs or cats to research facilities — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125);
- Dealer license fee (wholesale) to sell dogs or cats for resale — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125);
-
Dealer license fee (retail) to buy dogs or cats for resale to be assessed as follows:
- Transactions of up to 50 animals per year — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125);
- Transactions of 51 to 150 animals per year — two hundred and fifty dollars ($250);
- Transactions of 151 to 300 animals per year — five hundred dollars ($500);
- Transactions of 301 to 500 animals per year — seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750); and
- Transactions of more than 500 animals per year — one thousand dollars ($1,000); and
- Dealer license fee to transport dogs or cats in commerce — one hundred and twenty-five dollars ($125).
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 6; T.C.A., § 44-109; Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 2.
44-17-107. Revocation or suspension of dealer's license — Grounds — Hearing — Appeal.
-
The license of any dealer may be suspended or revoked by the commissioner for any of the following reasons:
- The incompetence or untrustworthiness of the licensee;
- Willful falsification of any information contained in the application;
- The conviction of the licensee or any responsible officer of the licensee of cruelty to animals or a violation of this part; or
- The nonconformance by the licensee to this part or the rules and regulations of the commissioner.
- If the commissioner has reason to believe that the license of any dealer should be suspended or revoked for any of the above reasons, the commissioner shall give the dealer ten (10) days' written notice of the commissioner's intention to suspend or revoke the license of the dealer and shall give the dealer an opportunity for a hearing on the issue. The dealer may produce evidence to show cause why the license should not be revoked or suspended. If the commissioner determines that conditions exist that warrant the suspension or revocation of the license, the commissioner may suspend the license for such period of time as the commissioner may specify or may revoke it, and where appropriate, may make an order that the dealer cease and desist from continuing any violation found to have been made of this part. If the license is suspended, the dealer may apply, after ninety (90) days, for reinstatement of the license.
- Any dealer aggrieved by a final order of the commissioner issued under this section may, within sixty (60) days after entry of such an order, have the order reviewed upon petition of certiorari in the chancery or circuit court of the county in which the dealer's residence or place of business is located.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 7; T.C.A., § 44-110.
44-17-108. Semi-annual reports to commissioner.
Each dealer shall file, on forms and at such times as prescribed by the commissioner, semi-annual reports containing the following information:
- The number of dogs or cats in the possession of the dealer on the date the report is filed;
- The number of dogs and cats purchased during the reporting period and the names and addresses of the persons from whom they were purchased;
- The number of dogs and cats sold during the reporting period and the names and addresses of the persons to whom they were sold; and
- The number of dogs and cats received by the dealer during the reporting period under circumstances other than purchase and the names and addresses of the persons from whom they were obtained.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 8; T.C.A., § 44-111.
44-17-109. Registration of research facilities with commissioner.
Every research facility shall register with the commissioner in accordance with such rules and regulations as the commissioner may prescribe.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 9; T.C.A., § 44-112.
44-17-110. Identification of dogs and cats delivered to research facilities.
All dogs and cats delivered for transportation, transported, purchased, or sold to research facilities shall be marked or identified in such manner as the commissioner may prescribe.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 10; T.C.A., § 44-113.
44-17-111. Records of research facilities and dealers.
Research facilities and dealers shall make and keep such records with respect to their purchase, sale, transportation, and handling of dogs and cats as the commissioner may prescribe.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 11; T.C.A., § 44-114.
44-17-112. Sales of dogs and cats to research facilities — Restrictions.
Dogs and cats shall not be offered for sale or sold to a research facility at public auction or by weight. No research facility shall purchase dogs or cats at public auction or by weight, nor shall any research facility purchase dogs or cats except from a licensed dealer, public pound, humane society, or from a person who breeds dogs or cats for sale to a research facility.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 12; T.C.A., § 44-115.
44-17-113. Bills of sale evidencing purchase of dogs or cats by dealers or research facilities.
- The purchase of any dog or cat by a dealer or by a research facility shall be evidenced by a bill of sale signed by the seller. The bill of sale shall be in form approved by the commissioner and shall certify that the seller is the lawful owner of the dog or cat and that ownership is transferred to the dealer or research facility. The bill of sale shall make reference to the mark or identification required by § 44-17-110.
- The bill of sale shall bear the name, telephone number, and address of the seller, and the driver license or social security number of the seller. At the time of sale, the dealer or research facility making the purchase shall verify from the seller the seller's driver license or social security number, whichever is appropriate. The bill of sale shall also contain a description of the dog or cat sold under that bill adequate to identify the animal. A bill of sale containing the same information shall be furnished by a dealer to any person purchasing a dog or cat at a flea market. Nothing in this subsection (b) shall be construed as enlarging the enforcement responsibilities of the commissioner beyond that existing prior to March 17, 1978.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 13; 1978, ch. 640, § 3; T.C.A., § 44-116.
44-17-114. Time dealers must hold dogs and cats after acquisition.
No dealer shall sell or otherwise dispose of any dog or cat within a period of five (5) business days after the acquisition of the animal or within such other period as may be specified by the commissioner.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 14; T.C.A., § 44-117.
44-17-115. Authority of commissioner to inspect premises of dealers or research facilities — Inspection of conveyances — Rules and regulations regarding inspection.
- The premises of any dealer or research facility shall be made available to the commissioner or the commissioner's representative for inspection at all reasonable times. The commissioner or the commissioner's representative shall make or cause to be made such inspections or investigations of the premises as considered necessary.
- The commissioner or the commissioner's representative, or any legally constituted law enforcement agency, may stop any motor vehicle or other conveyance transporting dogs or cats for inspections as to the humane treatment of animals and compliance with licensing requirements of this part or for investigations in search of lost or stolen animals.
- The commissioner shall issue rules and regulations requiring licensed dealers and research facilities to permit inspection of their animals and records at reasonable hours upon request by legally constituted law enforcement agencies in search of lost animals.
- Nothing in this part shall be construed as authorizing the commissioner to promulgate rules, regulations, or orders governing the handling, care, treatment or inspection of animals during actual research or experimentation by a research facility.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 15; T.C.A., § 44-118; Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 3.
44-17-116. Violations of provisions a misdemeanor.
- A person who violates any of the provisions of this part commits a Class C misdemeanor.
- After notice of any violation received from the commissioner, each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate offense.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 16; T.C.A., § 44-119; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class C misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
44-17-117. Construction and enforcement of provisions.
When construing or enforcing §§ 44-17-101 — 44-17-107, the act, omission, or failure of any individual acting for or employed by a dealer or research facility, within the scope of the individual's employment or office, shall be considered to be the act, omission, or failure of the dealer or research facility as well as of the individual.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 17; T.C.A., § 44-120.
44-17-118. Rules and regulations.
The commissioner may promulgate such rules and regulations as are reasonably necessary to implement this part.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 18; T.C.A., § 44-121; Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 6.
44-17-119. Supplemental provisions.
This part is in addition to and supplementary of title 39, chapter 14, part 2.
Acts 1967, ch. 332, § 19; T.C.A., § 44-122; Acts 1996, ch. 675, § 45.
44-17-120. Destruction of dog causing death or serious injury to human — Notice to dog's owner.
- Any dog that attacks a human and causes death or serious bodily injury may be destroyed upon the order of the judge of the general sessions court of the county wherein the attack occurred. Such orders shall be granted on the petition of the district attorney general for the county. The petition shall name the owner of the dog, and the owner shall be given notice in accordance with Rule 4.01 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, that if the owner does not appear before the court within five (5) days of the receipt thereof and show cause why the dog should not be destroyed, then the order shall issue and the dog shall be destroyed.
- Notwithstanding subsection (a), in counties having a population in excess of eight hundred thousand (800,000), or having a metropolitan form of government and a population in excess of one hundred thousand (100,000), according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census, a municipality or county is authorized to adopt local ordinances authorizing the municipality or the county to appropriately petition in a general sessions court to provide for the disposition of dangerous dogs or dogs causing death or serious bodily injury to humans or other animals.
Acts 1978, ch. 757, § 1; T.C.A., § 44-123; Acts 1999, ch. 85, § 1; 2010, ch. 882, § 1; 2014, ch. 562, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. For table of U.S. decennial populations of Tennessee counties, see Volume 13 and its supplement.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment, in (a), substituted “serious bodily injury” for “serious injury” in the first sentence, and substituted “given notice in accordance with Rule 4.01 of the Tennessee rules of civil procedure,” for “given notice as in civil cases,” in the third sentence; and, in (b), substituted “population in excess of eight hundred thousand (800,000), or having a metropolitan form of government and a population in excess of one hundred thousand (100,000), according to the 2000 federal census” for “population of not less than eight hundred twenty-five thousand (825,000) nor more than eight hundred thirty thousand (830,000), according to the 1990 federal census”, substituted “dangerous dogs or dogs” for “dangerous dogs and/or dogs”, and substituted “serious bodily injury” for “serious injury”.
The 2014 amendment substituted “judge of the general sessions court” for “judge of the circuit court” in the first sentence of (a).
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 882, § 2. May 5, 2010.
Acts 2014, ch. 562, § 2. July 1, 2014.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Legislative Intent.
Acting under the police power of the state, the general assembly, through T.C.A. § 44-17-120, seeks to protect the public against attacks by a vicious or rabid dog by providing a summary procedure for the destruction of a such an animal; yet, at the same time, seeks to give the owner a reasonable opportunity to test the validity of the order of destruction. State v. Hartley, 790 S.W.2d 276, 1990 Tenn. LEXIS 215 (Tenn. 1990).
2. Due Process.
Where a show cause order is issued on an oath based on “information and belief,” to satisfy the requirements of due process, the trial court should require the district attorney general to present evidence making out a prima facie case for the destruction of the dog that is the subject of the petition, in accordance with the requirements of T.C.A. § 44-17-120. If the dog owner is then unable to prove that the elements of T.C.A. § 44-17-120 have not been established, by a preponderance of the evidence, an order authorizing destruction of the dog should issue. State v. Hartley, 790 S.W.2d 276, 1990 Tenn. LEXIS 215 (Tenn. 1990).
3. No Right to Jury Trial.
Proceedings under T.C.A. § 44-17-120 are equitable, or remedial in nature, and no right to trial by jury is afforded. State v. Hartley, 790 S.W.2d 276, 1990 Tenn. LEXIS 215 (Tenn. 1990).
Collateral References.
Liability of owner of dog for dog's biting veterinarian or veterinarian's employee. 4 A.L.R.4th 349.
44-17-121. Confiscation of animals.
Subject to this part, the commissioner has the authority to confiscate animals as may be necessary to provide for the humane treatment of such animals.
Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 4.
44-17-122. Cooperation with local and federal authorities.
The commissioner may enter into cooperative agreements with local and/or federal agencies for purposes of implementing this part. When implementing the provisions for issuance of dealer licenses, the commissioner shall take into consideration other federal and/or local licensing regulations that may apply, it being the intent of the legislature not to impose duplicative licensing requirements and costs for dealers.
Acts 2002, ch. 774, § 5.
Part 2
Dogs Killing Livestock
44-17-201. Owners of dogs are liable for livestock killed.
Where any dog shall kill, or in any manner damage, any livestock in this state, the owner or harborer of such dog shall be liable, in an action for damage, to the owner of such livestock.
Acts 1859-1860, ch. 45, § 1; Shan., § 2871; mod. Code 1932, § 5105; Acts 1949, ch. 262, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 5105; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-101.
Cited: Henry v. Roach, 41 Tenn. App. 289, 293 S.W.2d 480, 1956 Tenn. App. LEXIS 169 (1956); McAbee v. Daniel, 60 Tenn. App. 239, 445 S.W.2d 917, 1968 Tenn. App. LEXIS 285 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1968); Blair v. Jackson, 526 S.W.2d 120, 1973 Tenn. App. LEXIS 245 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1973).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Dogs of Different Owners Doing Damage.
The owner of sheep cannot maintain a joint action against the different owners of dogs that unite in depredations upon his sheep, but must sue each separately for the damage done by his own dog. Dyer v. Hutchins, 87 Tenn. 198, 10 S.W. 194, 1888 Tenn. LEXIS 52 (1889); Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Rowe, 543 S.W.2d 337, 1976 Tenn. LEXIS 478 (Tenn. 1976).
44-17-202. Ignorance of dog's habits is no defense.
Ignorance of the vicious habits or character of the dog on the part of its owner shall be no defense in actions arising under § 44-17-201.
Acts 1859-1860, ch. 45, § 2; Shan., § 2872; Code 1932, § 5106; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-102.
Cited: Birdsong v. Wilkinson, 13 Tenn. App. 276, 1931 Tenn. App. LEXIS 70 (1931); Henry v. Roach, 41 Tenn. App. 289, 293 S.W.2d 480, 1956 Tenn. App. LEXIS 169 (1956); McAbee v. Daniel, 60 Tenn. App. 239, 445 S.W.2d 917, 1968 Tenn. App. LEXIS 285 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1968); Blair v. Jackson, 526 S.W.2d 120, 1973 Tenn. App. LEXIS 245 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1973).
44-17-203. No damages recoverable for killing or injuring such dog.
In an action for damages against a person for killing or injuring a dog, satisfactory proof that the dog had been or was killing or worrying livestock constitutes a good defense to such action.
Acts 1859-1860, ch. 45, § 3; Shan., § 2873; Code 1932, § 5107; Acts 1949, ch. 262, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 5107; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 44-103.
Cross-References. No liability for killing proud bitch at large, § 44-8-411.
Textbooks. Tennessee Jurisprudence, 2 Tenn. Juris., Animals, § 5.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Private Act.
A private act applicable only to counties of certain population and providing for the licensing of dogs and the protection of livestock from dogs repealed by implication other laws on the same subject insofar as the particular county falling within the provisions of the private act was concerned. Birdsong v. Wilkinson, 13 Tenn. App. 276, 1931 Tenn. App. LEXIS 70 (1931).
Part 3
Non-livestock Animal Humane Death Act
44-17-301. Title.
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Non-livestock Animal Humane Death Act.”
Acts 1980, ch. 482, § 1; 2001, ch. 70, § 1.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Relation to Employment Law.
Where employee reported violations of Tennessee's Veterinary Practice Act and the Non-livestock Animal Humane Death Act, as well as the regulations pertaining to those Acts, the employee did not have to show a subjective intent to promote the public good in order to pursue her claims based upon refusal to participate, or that she acted solely with a purpose to further the public good, without any consideration of his or her own personal interest. Coleman v. Humane Soc'y of Memphis, — S.W.3d —, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 77 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2014).
44-17-302. Application.
- This part shall be applicable only to public and private agencies, animal shelters and other facilities operated for the collection, care or euthanasia of stray, neglected, abandoned or unwanted non-livestock animals.
- This part shall apply to any licensed veterinarian, Tennessee veterinarian medical technician, employee, volunteer, whether compensated or otherwise, or any other person acting as an agent on behalf of a public or private agency, animal shelter or other facility operated for the collection, care or euthanasia of stray, neglected, abandoned or unwanted non-livestock animals.
Acts 1980, ch. 482, § 2; 2001, ch. 70, § 1; 2008, ch. 639, § 2.
Amendments. The 2008 amendment added (b).
Effective Dates. Acts 2008, ch. 639, § 4. July 1, 2008.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Applicability.
Tennessee's lethal injection protocol does not violate the Non-livestock Humane Death Act, T.C.A. § 44-17-301 et seq., because the plain language of the act is applicable only to certain public and private agencies set out in T.C.A. § 44-17-302, which group does not include the department of correction; also, the plain language in the statutory definition of a non-livestock animal as provided in T.C.A. § 39-14-201 does not include human beings. Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 828 (Tenn. 2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1147, 126 S. Ct. 2288, 164 L. Ed. 2d 813, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 3970 (2006).
44-17-303. Methods allowed.
-
Sodium pentobarbital and such other agents as may be specifically approved by the rules of the board of veterinary medicine shall be the only methods used for euthanasia of non-livestock animals by public and private agencies, animal shelters and other facilities operated for the collection, care or euthanasia of stray, neglected, abandoned or unwanted non-livestock animals. A lethal solution shall be used in the following order of preference:
- Intravenous injection by hypodermic needle;
- Intraperitoneal injection by hypodermic needle;
- Intracardial injection by hypodermic needle, but only if performed on heavily sedated, anesthetized or comatose animals; or
- Solution or powder added to food.
- A non-livestock animal may be tranquilized with an approved and humane substance before any form of euthanasia involving a lethal injection is performed, but the animal must be tranquilized if the euthanasia is performed by the method described in subdivision (a)(3).
- Succinylcholine chloride, curare, curariform mixtures, strychnine, nicotine, chloral hydrate, magnesium or potassium or any substance that acts as a neuromuscular blocking agent, or any chamber that causes a change in body oxygen may not be used on any non-livestock animal for the purpose of euthanasia. Any such chamber in use as of July 1, 2001, shall be phased out and shall not be used on or after July 1, 2002.
- Euthanasia shall be performed only by a licensed veterinarian, Tennessee veterinarian medical technician or an employee or agent of a public or private agency, animal shelter or other facility operated for the collection, care or euthanasia of stray, neglected, abandoned or unwanted non-livestock animals, provided that the Tennessee veterinarian medical technician, employee or agent has successfully completed a euthanasia-technician certification course. The curriculum for such course must be approved by the board of veterinary medical examiners and must include, at a minimum, knowledge of animal anatomy, behavior and physiology; animal restraint and handling as it pertains to euthanasia; the pharmacology, proper dosages, administration techniques of euthanasia solution, verification of death techniques, laws regulating the storage, security and accountability of euthanasia solutions; euthanasia technician stress management and the proper disposal of euthanized non-livestock animals.
- An employee, agent or Tennessee veterinarian medical technician performing euthanasia prior to July 1, 2001, who previously passed an approved euthanasia-technician certification course will be accepted as qualified under this part to perform euthanasia on non-livestock animals. Any other employee, agent or Tennessee veterinarian medical technician seeking to perform euthanasia on non-livestock animals on or after July 1, 2001, must obtain certification prior to performing any such euthanasia.
- A non-livestock animal may not be left unattended between the time euthanasia procedures are first begun and the time that death occurs, nor may its body be disposed of until a qualified person confirms death.
- Notwithstanding this section or any other law to the contrary, whenever an emergency situation exists in the field that requires the immediate euthanasia of an injured, dangerous or severely diseased non-livestock animal, a law enforcement officer, a veterinarian, or agent of a local animal control unit or the designee of such an agent may humanely destroy the non-livestock animal.
- For purposes of this part, “non-livestock animal” shall have the meaning set forth in § 39-14-201.
- The attorney general and reporter may bring an action to enjoin any violation of this part.
- Any person who violates this part is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
- These provisions shall not apply to exotic animals being held under the authority of title 70, chapter 4, part 4, and Rule 1660-1-18-.05 of the Official Compilation of Rules and Regulations of the State of Tennessee.
Acts 1980, ch. 482, § 3; 1997, ch. 106, §§ 8, 9; 2001, ch. 70, § 1; 2008, ch. 639, § 1.
Amendments. The 2008 amendment substituted “before any form of euthanasia involving a lethal injection is performed, but the animal must be tranquilized if the euthanasia is performed by the method described in subdivision (a)(3)” for “before euthanasia is performed” at the end of (b).
Effective Dates. Acts 2008, ch. 639, § 4. July 1, 2008.
Cross-References. Penalty for Class A misdemeanor, § 40-35-111.
Attorney General Opinions. Applicability of T.C.A. § 44-17-303(a)(3) to licensed veterinarians, OAG 07-158 (12/5/07).
Cited: Cole v. State, — S.W.3d —, 2011 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 186 (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 8, 2011).
44-17-304. Minimum holding time before an animal may be euthanized — Emergency exception.
- Before any public or private agency, animal shelter or other facility operated for the collection, care or euthanasia of stray, neglected, abandoned or unwanted non-livestock animals euthanizes a non-livestock animal that the facility knows or should know, by identification or vaccination tags, personal knowledge or otherwise, has an owner, the facility shall be required to hold the animal for at least three (3) full business days from the time it is brought to the facility before the animal may be euthanized.
- Subsection (a) shall not apply where an emergency situation exists that requires the immediate euthanasia of an injured, dangerous or severely diseased non-livestock animal.
- A public or private agency, animal shelter, or other facility that knows or should know that a non-livestock animal has an owner under subsection (a) must make a reasonable effort to locate and notify the animal's owners within forty-eight (48) hours of the time that the public or private agency, animal shelter, or other facility takes custody of the animal or, if the animal is taken into custody on a Friday, within two (2) business days of the date that the public or private agency, animal shelter, or other facility takes custody of the animal.
Acts 2008, ch. 639, § 3; 2017, ch. 206, § 3.
Amendments. The 2017 amendment added (c).
Effective Dates. Acts 2008, ch. 639, § 4. July 1, 2008.
Acts 2017, ch. 206, § 4. April 27, 2017.
44-17-305. [Repealed.]
Compiler's Notes. Former §§ 44-17-304, 44-17-305 (Acts 1980, ch. 482, §§ 4, 5), concerning the construction and use of chambers, were repealed by Acts 2001, ch. 70, § 1, effective July 1, 2001.
Part 4
Miscellaneous Provisions
44-17-401. Electronic locating collars.
No agency or entity of state or local government shall enact, adopt, promulgate, or enforce any law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or other policy that restricts or prevents the owner of any dog from using an electronic locating collar to protect the dog from loss; except that the fish and wildlife commission may limit the use of electronic locating collars through the promulgation of rules and regulations when required for the proper management of wildlife species.
Acts 1996, ch. 789, § 1; 2012, ch. 993, § 6.
Amendments. The 2012 amendment substituted “fish and wildlife commission” for “wildlife resources commission”.
Effective Dates. Acts 2012, ch. 993, § 14. June 30, 2012.
44-17-402. Retrieval of hunting dogs from federal property operated by wildlife resources agency.
If the owner or a person in control of a dog is hunting with either a firearm or a bow and arrow, and that person's dog strays onto property owned by the federal government and operated by the Tennessee wildlife resources agency, the owner or person may proceed onto the property without the person's firearm or bow and arrow. The person shall not be liable for any criminal sanction related to the pursuit of the dog. However, nothing in this section shall be construed to grant civil immunity to the owner or the person in control of the dog for any personal injury or property damage caused by the dog.
Acts 1996, ch. 789, § 2.
44-17-403. Death of pet caused by negligent act of another — Damages.
-
- If a person's pet is killed or sustains injuries that result in death caused by the unlawful and intentional, or negligent, act of another or the animal of another, the trier of fact may find the individual causing the death or the owner of the animal causing the death liable for up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) in noneconomic damages; provided, that if the death is caused by the negligent act of another, the death or fatal injury must occur on the property of the deceased pet's owner or caretaker, or while under the control and supervision of the deceased pet's owner or caretaker.
- If an unlawful act resulted in the death or permanent disability of a person's guide dog, then the value of the guide dog shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, both the cost of the guide dog as well as the cost of any specialized training the guide dog received.
- As used in this section, “pet” means any domesticated dog or cat normally maintained in or near the household of its owner.
- Limits for noneconomic damages set out in subsection (a) shall not apply to causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress or any other civil action other than the direct and sole loss of a pet.
- Noneconomic damages awarded pursuant to this section shall be limited to compensation for the loss of the reasonably expected society, companionship, love and affection of the pet.
- This section shall not apply to any not-for-profit entity or governmental agency, or its employees, negligently causing the death of a pet while acting on the behalf of public health or animal welfare; to any killing of a dog that has been or was killing or worrying livestock as in § 44-17-203; nor shall this section be construed to authorize any award of noneconomic damages in an action for professional negligence against a licensed veterinarian.
Acts 2000, ch. 762, § 1; 2004, ch. 940, § 4; 2004, ch. 957, §§ 5, 6, 7.
Compiler's Notes. Acts 2000, ch. 762, § 2, provided that this section shall be known and may be cited as the “T-Bo Act.”
Acts 2000, ch. 762, § 4, provided that this section shall apply to any fatal injury sustained on or after May 22, 2000.
Acts 2004, ch. 940, § 1 provided that the act shall be known and may be cited as the “General Patton Act of 2003”.
Acts 2004, ch. 940, § 8 provided that the provisions of this act shall not apply to any animal while that animal is being used for training, for an occupational purpose, or for hunting.
Law Reviews.
Animal Consortium, 84 Tenn. L.Rev. 893 (2017).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Noneconomic Damages Not Allowed.
Cat owners were not entitled to recover noneconomic damages for the death of their cat where the veterinarian who improperly paced a feeding tube in the cat's trachea and the sole member of the LLC that employed the veterinarian were both licensed veterinarians. Delany v. Kriger, — S.W.3d —, 2019 Tenn. App. LEXIS 139 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2019).
Collateral References.
Recovery of damages for emotional distress due to treatment of pets and animals. 91 A.L.R.5th 545.
44-17-404. Recovery for death or injury to guide dogs.
If a person's guide dog is killed or sustains injuries that result in death or permanent disability caused by the unlawful and intentional, or negligent, act of another or the animal of another, then the trier of fact may find the individual causing the death or the owner of the animal causing the death liable for economic damages, which shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, both the cost of the guide dog as well as the cost of any specialized training the guide dog received.
Acts 2004, ch. 957, § 3.
Cross-References. Actions deemed theft of guide dogs, § 39-14-208.
Aggravated cruelty to animals, § 39-14-212.
Part 5
Spay/Neuter Law
44-17-501. Short title.
This part shall be known and may be cited as “The Tennessee Spay/Neuter Law.”
Acts 2000, ch. 789, § 2.
44-17-502. Requirement for adoption.
-
No person shall adopt a dog or cat from an agency, including, but not limited to, an animal shelter, dog pound, animal control agency or humane shelter operated by a municipality, county, or other governmental agency within the state, or a private organization operating a shelter from which animals are adopted or reclaimed, unless:
- The dog or cat has already been spayed or neutered;
- The dog or cat has been spayed or neutered by a licensed veterinarian while in the custody of the agency; or
-
The new owner signs a written agreement with the agency stating that the new owner will have the dog or cat spayed or neutered by a licensed veterinarian:
- Within thirty (30) days of the date of the adoption, if such dog or cat is sexually mature; or
- Within thirty (30) days after the dog or cat reaches six (6) months of age, if the dog or cat is not sexually mature at the time of the adoption.
- Nothing in this section shall preclude the spaying or neutering of a sexually immature dog or cat at the discretion of a licensed veterinarian with the consent of the new owner.
Acts 2000, ch. 789, § 3.
44-17-503. Deposit — Forfeiture of deposit — Use of forfeited deposits.
- If the dog or cat being adopted has not been spayed or neutered, the agency shall require a deposit of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) from the new owner prior to the adoption in order to ensure that the dog or cat is spayed or neutered. The new owner may request and shall receive a refund of the deposit from the agency upon providing confirmation of the spaying or neutering.
-
- If the new owner fails to have the dog or cat spayed or neutered within the time frame established by § 44-17-502, or if the spaying or neutering is timely performed, but the new owner fails to request the return of the deposit within an additional ten (10) days after the date by which the spaying or neutering is required to be performed, the deposit shall be forfeited to the agency holding the deposit and shall be used by the agency to conduct programs to spay or neuter dogs and cats in the community where the agency is located.
- The forfeited deposit may also be used to defray operational expenses of the programs, including, but not limited to, costs for purchasing food, medications, tests, upgrades for the animal housing areas, or any other supplies or products which would improve the quality of life for dogs or cats in such programs.
- No forfeited deposit may be used to pay salaries of persons employed by any agency located within the county.
- Before the forfeited deposits may be used by an agency for the purposes set out in this subsection (b), the agency shall maintain a minimum balance in the forfeited deposit fund of no less than the total amount of unclaimed deposits collected during the previous six-month period.
Acts 2000, ch. 789, § 4; 2010, ch. 615, § 1; 2012, ch. 513, § 1; 2018, ch. 635, § 1.
Amendments. The 2010 amendment substituted “in the community where the agency is located” for “and/or to conduct educational programs in support of the spaying and neutering of dogs and cats” at the end of (b).
The 2012 amendment added the proviso to the end of (b).
The 2018 amendment rewrote (b) which read: “(b) If the new owner fails to have the dog or cat spayed or neutered within the time frame established by § 44-17-502, or if the spaying or neutering is timely performed, but the new owner fails to request the return of the deposit within an additional ten (10) days after the date by which the spaying or neutering is required to be performed, the deposit shall be forfeited to the agency holding the deposit and shall be used by the agency to conduct programs to spay or neuter dogs and cats in the community where the agency is located; provided, that in any county having a population of not less than fifty-three thousand five hundred (53,500) nor more than fifty-three thousand six hundred (53,600), according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census, the deposit shall be used to defray operational expenses of the programs, including, but not limited to, costs for purchasing food, medications, tests, upgrades for the animal housing areas, or any other supplies or products which would improve the quality of life for dogs or cats in such programs, and the deposit shall not be used to pay salaries of persons employed by any agency located within such county.”
Effective Dates. Acts 2010, ch. 615, § 2. March 2, 2010.
Acts 2012, ch. 513, § 2. February 7, 2012.
Acts 2018, ch. 635, § 2. July 1, 2018.
44-17-504. Petition for compliance.
If a person fails to comply with this part, the agency may file a petition with a court of competent jurisdiction seeking compliance and/or requesting return of the dog or cat to the agency from which it was adopted.
Acts 2000, ch. 789, § 5.
44-17-505. Dogs or cats claimed by owner.
Nothing in this part shall be construed to authorize an agency to spay or neuter a dog or cat, if the dog or cat is being claimed by and returned to its lawful owner within seven (7) days of the dog or cat being taken into custody by the agency.
Acts 2000, ch. 789, § 6.
Part 6
Chemical Capture
44-17-601. “Chemical capture” defined — Authorized drugs — Administration of drugs.
- As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires, “chemical capture” means the capture of a dog or cat by means of sedation using approved drugs as provided in this part and appropriate drug administering equipment.
- Chemical capture by certified animal chemical capture technicians shall only be effected by use of Telazol or such other drugs as may be determined by the board of veterinary medical examiners.
- Drugs used for chemical capture shall only be administered by a licensed veterinarian, a licensed veterinary technician employed by and functioning under the direct supervision of a licensed veterinarian, or such other individuals qualified as certified animal chemical capture technicians as determined by the board of veterinary medical examiners pursuant to § 63-12-144.
- With respect to certified animal chemical capture technicians, chemical capture shall be effected only in accordance with a written protocol and only when all other methods of capture have failed.
Acts 2008, ch. 805, § 1.
Compiler's Notes. Acts 2008, ch 805, § 3 provided that the board of veterinary medical examiners is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations to effectuate the purposes of the act. The rules and regulations shall be promulgated in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5.
Effective Dates. Acts 2008, ch. 805, § 4. January 1, 2009; provided, that for purposes of promulgating rules and regulations, the act shall take effect April 25, 2008.
Part 7
Commercial Breeder Act [Expired]
44-17-701. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-702. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-703. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-704. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-705. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-706. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-707. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-708. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-709. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-710. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-711. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-712. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-713. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-714. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
44-17-715. [Expired.]
Compiler's Notes. Former part 7, §§ 44-17-701 — 44-17-715 (Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 1), concerning the commercial breeder act, expired on June 30, 2014.
Acts 2009, ch. 591, § 3(b) provided that the act, which added title 44, ch. 17, part 7 and § 47-18-130, shall terminate and expire on June 30, 2014. The comptroller of the treasury is urged to study the implementation and impact of the provisions of the act as it implements the licensing of commercial breeders of dogs and cats. As a part of the study, the comptroller shall examine the benefits afforded to the public by the licensing of commercial breeders, the health of dogs and cats maintained by these commercial breeders, and the impact upon the costs of dogs and cats that are sold to the public by these commercial breeders. If a study is conducted, the comptroller shall report any findings and recommendations of the study to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2014.
Chapter 18
Feedlots, Dairy Farms and Poultry Production Houses
44-18-101. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Dairy farm” means any place or premises where one (1) or more cows are kept and from which a part or all of the milk or milk products is provided, sold or offered for sale to a milk plant, transfer station or receiving station;
- “Department” means the department of environment and conservation, and includes any officer, agency or designee of that department;
- “Established date of operation” means the date on which a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house commenced operating. If the physical facilities of the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house are subsequently expanded, the established date of operation for each expansion is deemed to be a separate and independent “established date of operation” established as of this date of commencement of the expanded operations, and the commencement of expanded operations shall not divest the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house of a previously established date of operation;
- “Established date of ownership” means the date of the recording of an appropriate muniment of title establishing the ownership of realty;
- “Feedlot” means a lot, yard, corral or other area in which livestock are confined, primarily for the purposes of feeding, growing, raising, or birthing prior to slaughter. “Feedlot” does not include areas that are used for the raising of crops or other vegetation upon which livestock are allowed to graze or feed;
- “Livestock” means all equine as well as animals that are being raised primarily for use as food or fiber for human utilization or consumption including, but not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, goats, and poultry;
- “Materially affects” means prohibits or regulates with respect to the location, or the emission of noise, effluent, odors, sewage, waste or similar products resulting from the operation or the location or use of buildings, machinery, vehicles, equipment or other real or personal property used in the operation of a livestock feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house;
- “Nuisance” means and includes public or private nuisance as defined either by statute or by the common law;
- “Nuisance action or proceeding” means and includes every action, claim or proceeding, whether brought at law, in equity or as an administrative proceeding, that is based on nuisance;
- “Owner or operator” means any person who owns, leases, operates, controls or supervises a feedlot;
- “Poultry production house” means any place or premises where chickens are kept for the production of eggs or broilers for resale to processors, wholesalers or retailers;
- “Regulations” means a resolution by the county legislative body or an ordinance by the governing body of any municipality regulating or prohibiting the normal noises of animals or fowls, the noises in the operation of the equipment, the odors normally associated with any feedlot, dairy farm, or poultry production house, or the preclusion of any animals or fowls from within the city or from within a defined area of the county;
- “Rule of the department” means a rule as defined in the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, that materially affects the operation of a feedlot, dairy farm, or poultry production house and that has been adopted by the department. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to empower the department to make any rule; and
- “Zoning requirement” means a regulation or ordinance that has been adopted by a city, county, township, school district, or any special-purpose district or authority, that materially affects the operation of a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to empower any agency described in this definition to make any regulation or ordinance.
Acts 1979, ch. 138, § 1; T.C.A., § 53-6701; Acts 1992, ch. 693, § 1; 1996, ch. 792, § 2; 2002, ch. 635, §§ 1, 2.
Cross-References. Egg promotion board, § 43-29-120.
Right to farm, title 43, ch. 26.
Comparative Legislation. Nuisance — Feedlots, dairy farms and egg houses:
Ala. Code § 6-5-127.
Ark. Code § 2-4-101 et seq.
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 41-1-7.
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.072.
Miss. Code Ann. § 95-3-29.
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.295.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 106-700 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-22.28 et seq.
Cited: Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLC, — S.W.3d —, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 229 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2012).
Collateral References. Nuisance 6.
44-18-102. Nuisance action or proceeding against feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house.
- In any nuisance action or proceeding against a feedlot, dairy farm, or poultry production house brought by or on behalf of a person whose date of ownership of realty is subsequent to the established date of operation of the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, proof of compliance with §§ 44-18-103 and 44-18-104 shall be an absolute defense; provided, that the conditions or circumstances alleged to constitute a nuisance are subject to regulatory jurisdiction in accordance with § 44-18-103 or § 44-18-104.
- In any nuisance action or proceeding against a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house brought by or on behalf of a person whose date of ownership of realty precedes the established date of operation of the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, but whose actual or proposed use of the realty for residential or commercial purposes is subsequent to the established date of operation of the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, proof of compliance with §§ 44-18-103 and 44-18-104 shall be an absolute defense; provided, that the conditions or circumstances alleged to constitute a nuisance are subject to regulatory jurisdiction in accordance with § 44-18-103 or § 44-18-104.
- The normal noises and appearance of the animals or fowls, the noises in the operation of the equipment or the appearance of the equipment, the odors normally associated with any feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, the appearance of a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, or litter and/or manure additive that is designed to bind soluble phosphorous in conformity with the Tennessee Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) interim conservation practice standard if used by any feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house, shall not constitute grounds for any nuisance action or proceeding against a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house brought by or on behalf of a person whose date of ownership of realty is subsequent to the established date of operation of the feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house.
Acts 1979, ch. 138, § 2; T.C.A., § 53-6702; Acts 2002, ch. 635, §§ 2, 3.
44-18-103. Applicability of rules of department.
- This section shall apply to the department's rules except for rules required for delegation of the national pollutant discharge elimination system permit program pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Section 402, Public Law 92-500, 33 U.S.C. 1342, as amended.
-
The applicability of rules of the department, other than those issued under the Tennessee Air Quality Act, compiled in title 68, chapter 201, part 1, shall be as follows:
- A rule of the department in effect before April 12, 1979, shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to April 12, 1979;
- A rule of the department shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation subsequent to the effective date of the rule;
- A rule of the department adopted after April 12, 1979, shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house holding any department permit and having an established date of operation prior to the effective date of the rule; and
- A rule of the department adopted after April 12, 1979, shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house not previously required to hold a department permit and having an established date of operation prior to the effective date of the rule.
-
The applicability of rules promulgated under the “Tennessee Air Quality Act,” compiled in title 68, chapter 201, part 1, shall be as follows:
- A rule of the department or the air pollution control board in effect on April 12, 1979, shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to April 12, 1979;
- A rule of the department or the air pollution control board shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation subsequent to the effective date of the rule; and
- A rule of the department or the air pollution control board pertaining to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house adopted after April 12, 1979, shall not apply to any feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house having an established date of operation prior to the effective date of the rule.
Acts 1979, ch. 138, § 3; T.C.A., § 53-6703; Acts 1992, ch. 693, § 1; 2002, ch. 635, § 2.
44-18-104. Applicability of zoning requirements and regulations.
-
The applicability of zoning requirements is as follows:
- A zoning requirement shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation subsequent to the effective date of the zoning requirements;
- A zoning requirement shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to the effective date of the zoning requirement;
- A zoning requirement that is in effect on April 12, 1979, shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to April 12, 1979; and
- A zoning requirement adopted by a city shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house that becomes located within an incorporated or unincorporated area subject to regulation by that city by virtue of an incorporation or annexation that takes effect after April 12, 1979.
- A person shall comply with this section as a matter of law where no zoning requirement exists.
-
The applicability of regulations shall be as follows:
- A regulation shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation subsequent to the effective date of such regulation;
- A regulation shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to the effective date of the regulation;
- A regulation that is in effect on April 12, 1979, shall apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house with an established date of operation prior to April 12, 1979; and
- A regulation adopted by a city shall not apply to a feedlot, dairy farm or poultry production house that becomes located within an incorporated or unincorporated area subject to regulation by such city by virtue of an incorporation or annexation that takes effect after April 12, 1979.
- A person shall comply with this section as a matter of law where no regulation exists.
Acts 1979, ch. 138, § 4; T.C.A., § 53-6704; Acts 2002, ch. 635, § 2.
Attorney General Opinions. Based on the applicable definitions of “agriculture” and “agricultural,” concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) clearly involve “agricultural” activities and the “agricultural” use of land and structures. Thus, a county is not authorized to regulate CAFOs under its zoning powers or its general powers. T.C.A. § 44-18-104 merely sets forth which zoning requirements and regulations apply when determining whether a feedlot, dairy farm, or poultry production house is to be afforded absolute immunity from a nuisance claim, but it does not provide authority for a county to enact zoning requirements or regulations. T.C.A. § 13-7-114, which prevents counties from using their zoning power to regulate structures and land used for agricultural purposes, is not in conflict with T.C.A. § 44-18-104 because there is no independent source of zoning power bestowed upon any local entity under this right-to-farm law. T.C.A § 44-18-104(b) and (d) do not direct compliance with the section when no zoning requirements or regulations exist. When no zoning requirements or regulations exist, these provisions convey that a person’s compliance with the section is deemed to be established as a matter of law. OAG 18-30, 2018 Tenn. AG LEXIS 29 (7/6/2018).
Cited: Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLC, — S.W.3d —, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 229 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2012).
Chapter 19
Dairy Industry Promotion Act
44-19-101. Short title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Dairy Industry Promotion Act.”
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 1.
Comparative Legislation. Dairy industry promotion:
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 247.450 et seq.
Miss. Code Ann. § 69-35-1 et seq.
Collateral References. Agriculture 2.
44-19-102. Legislative declaration.
It is declared that the general assembly finds that it is in the interest of the public welfare that Tennessee farmers who are producers of milk and milk products be permitted and encouraged to act jointly and in cooperation with other producers, handlers, dealers and processors of milk products in promoting and stimulating, by advertising, research, nutrition education and other methods, the increased consumption, use and sale of all domestic milk and milk products without identification by brand or trade name.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 2.
44-19-103. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- “Commissioner” means the commissioner of agriculture;
- “Department” means the department of agriculture;
- “Handler” or “dealer” means any person, including any distributor, processor, bulk handler, or operator of a store, who purchases or receives on consignment or otherwise, milk or milk products of every kind and description, within the state, for sale, shipment, storage, processing or manufacture;
- “Milk” means milk from cows and all of its natural components, sweet cream, sour cream, skim milk, flavored milk, buttermilk, condensed or concentrated, whole, low fat, or skim milk for use in milk products of every kind and description;
- “Person” means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, cooperative or other business entity;
- “Processor” means any person engaged in the business of processing milk and other materials into milk products of every kind and description;
- “Producer” means every person in the state of Tennessee who produces milk or cream from cows and thereafter causes the same to be marketed as milk, cream or other milk and dairy products who has been issued and possesses a valid current producer's permit or certification, issued by the department;
- “Purchaser” means any handler, dealer or processor who purchases or receives milk and milk products from producers on a commercial basis;
- “Referendum” means any voting procedure under which affected producers may, by secret ballot, vote for or against an assessment authorized by this chapter;
- “Tennessee dairy promotion committee” means a statewide committee appointed by the commissioner established pursuant to this chapter; and
- “Vote” means to cast a ballot in a referendum.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 3.
44-19-104. Actions not illegal or in restraint of trade.
No association, meeting or activity undertaken pursuant to this chapter and intended to benefit all of the producers, handlers and processors of milk products shall be illegal or in restraint of trade.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 4.
44-19-105. Referendum on assessment authorized.
Producers of milk and milk products on a commercial basis may, by referendum of producers held in accordance with this chapter, levy upon themselves an assessment on milk products for the purpose of financing or contributing to the financing of a program of promoting, advertising, researching and other methods designed to increase the consumption, use and sale of domestic milk and milk products.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 5.
44-19-106. Petition for assessment.
Whenever the commissioner has received a petition signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the producers of milk in the state of Tennessee, the commissioner shall publish the filing of the petition through the medium of the public press in the state within fifteen (15) days of the receipt thereof. The petition shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
- Date;
- Amount of assessment sought, subject to the limits set forth in this chapter, and any change in assessment sought or the termination of an existing assessment;
- The date when, if approved, the assessment, change in assessment or termination of an existing assessment will take effect; and
- A statement that the persons signing the petition are producers in Tennessee holding a valid producer permit or certification issued by the department.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 6.
Cross-References. Petition of referendum on assent to or change in referendum, § 44-19-118.
44-19-107. Consideration and certification of petition.
Upon the filing with the commissioner of a petition for referendum, the commissioner shall, within fifteen (15) days thereafter, convene the Tennessee dairy promotion committee, established by § 44-19-114, to consider the petition; and if upon such consideration the committee finds the petition for referendum to meet the requirements of this chapter, then, and in such an event, it shall be the duty of the commissioner to certify the petition for referendum as provided in this chapter.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 7.
Cross-References. Tennessee dairy promotion committee, § 44-19-114.
44-19-108. Filing of petition — Effect of referendum.
The commissioner shall, within sixty (60) days after the filing of a petition for referendum, and subject to a finding by the Tennessee dairy promotion committee that the petition is properly filed, determine by referendum whether the producers assent to the proposed assessment, change in assessment or termination of an existing assessment. The producers shall be deemed to have assented to the assessment, change in assessment or termination of an existing assessment if a simple majority of those voting assent to the assessment, change in assessment or termination of an existing assessment by affirmative vote.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 8.
44-19-109. Conducting of referendum — Voting — Qualifications.
- Any referendum conducted under this chapter shall be held on a statewide basis.
- Persons eligible to participate in the referendum shall include all producers engaged in the production of milk products on a commercial basis, who have been issued and possess a valid current producer's permit, or certification, issued by the department.
- In the referendum, individuals so eligible for participation shall have one (1) vote per permit or certificate.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 9.
44-19-110. Supervision and cost of referendum.
The manner, conduct, and management of any referendum held under this chapter shall be under the supervision and direction of the commissioner. The expense of the referendum shall be paid by the department if there is no assessment currently in effect; otherwise, the Tennessee dairy promotion committee shall bear the cost of the referendum as part of its regular budget.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 10.
44-19-111. Notice of referendum and assessment — Ballots.
With respect to any referendum conducted under this chapter, the commissioner shall, before calling and announcing such referendum, give notice of the effective date of the assessment, if adopted, and the amount and basis of the assessment proposed to be collected; provided, that no assessment levied under this chapter shall exceed ten cents (10¢) per hundred weight. Voting in the referendum shall be by mail ballots returned to an address determined and announced by the commissioner who shall mail a ballot to all qualified producers eligible to vote in the referendum.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 11.
44-19-112. Distribution of ballots — Declaration of results.
The commissioner shall prepare and distribute to all eligible voters, by mail, in advance of the referendum, all necessary ballots for the purpose thereof; and following the referendum and within ten (10) days following the return date for such ballots, the commissioner shall canvass and publicly declare the result of the referendum.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 12.
44-19-113. Implementation of results — Imposition, notice and disposition of assessment.
Upon the approval of an assessment or a change in assessment in accordance with this chapter, the commissioner shall notify forthwith, by certified mail, all persons engaged either in the business of purchasing milk directly from producers or marketing milk in this state, either individually or on behalf of producers, that on and after the date specified in such letter, the specified assessment shall be deducted from the producer's payment for the sale or marketing of milk. The assessment so deducted shall, on or before the twenty-fifth day of the month following the end of the month in which milk is sold or marketed, be remitted to the Tennessee dairy promotion committee established in this chapter. These funds, including donations from individuals, concerns, corporations and grants from state or governmental agencies, shall be used for the purpose of promoting and stimulating by advertising, research, nutrition education and other methods, the increased consumption, use and sale, of milk. The books and records relating to the payment of the assessment of all persons who purchase or market milk shall at all times during regular business hours be open for inspection by the commissioner or the commissioner's duly authorized agents.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 13.
44-19-114. Tennessee dairy promotion committee.
- A Tennessee dairy promotion committee shall be established, which shall consist of an odd number of members with no fewer than five (5) and no more than eleven (11) members. The commissioner shall be an ex officio member with nonvoting status.
- The committee shall be organized as a statewide committee appointed by the commissioner from nominations received from agricultural dairy cooperatives and individual producers who are not members of agricultural dairy cooperatives in the state of Tennessee, and shall be known as the Tennessee dairy promotion committee. Nominating procedures, qualifications, representation, and term of office shall be prescribed by the commissioner. The committee shall be composed of producers directly affected by the assessments in proportional representation by method of marketing either through agricultural dairy cooperatives or by direct sale, as the program shall prescribe.
- A member of the committee shall be entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses in accordance with the comprehensive travel regulations as promulgated by the department of finance and administration and approved by the attorney general and reporter, and fifty dollars ($50.00) per diem while attending meetings of the committee or engaged in the performance of official responsibilities delegated by the committee.
-
The duties and responsibilities of the committee shall be prescribed by the commissioner and, to the extent applicable, shall include the following duties and responsibilities:
- Developing and recommending to the commissioner administrative rules and procedures relating to the assessment;
- Recommending to the commissioner such amendments to the administrative procedures as may be deemed advisable;
- Preparing and effectuating the estimated budget required for the proper operation of the committee;
- Developing methods for assessing producers, and methods for collecting the necessary funds;
- Collecting and assembling information and data necessary for the proper administration of the assessment program;
- Contracting with existing non-brand dairy promotion organizations; and
- Performing any other duties necessary for the operation of the dairy industry promotion program in coordination with the commissioner.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 14.
Compiler's Notes. The Tennessee dairy promotion committee, created by this section, terminates June 30, 2021. See §§ 4-29-112, 4-29-242.
44-19-115. Refund of promotion money.
If and when the national program pursuant to the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-180) establishes a procedure for the return of promotion moneys to the producer, at the producer's request, then and only then shall the Tennessee dairy promotion committee, upon written request of any producer, refund from the funds collected from that producer pursuant to this chapter the same proportion of moneys as the national program. The refund request by affidavit of the individual producers shall provide for the refund of moneys collected from that producer during the immediately preceding three-month period, except producers may request a partial refund. Refund forms shall be provided to producers at the producers' request by the committee, and producers desiring refunds shall file refund forms before the end of the month immediately following the three-month period for which the refund is being requested. Producers shall establish their right to a refund by providing copies of vouchers or sales receipts from processors or buyers showing contributions withheld from the producer pursuant to this chapter.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 15.
Compiler's Notes. The Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-180) is codified as 7 U.S.C. §§ 608, 1314, 1379, 1421, 1427, 1445, 1446, 4501-4514, and 4531.
44-19-116. Deposits — Disbursements.
Any moneys collected pursuant to this chapter shall not be state funds, and shall be deposited in a bank or other depository in this state, as from time to time determined by the Tennessee dairy promotion committee, allocated to the dairy industry promotion program under which they are collected, and disbursed by the committee only for necessary expenses incurred with respect to the program, including expenses and per diem of the committee, in accordance with the rules and regulations established under the program by the commissioner.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 16.
44-19-117. Investments — Use of funds.
The Tennessee dairy promotion committee may invest all assessments, gifts or grants that are collected or received by the committee. The committee may not use funds received, collected or accrued for any purpose other than program operations including the purposes designated for those funds in this chapter, and the reasonable costs or expenses necessary to the operation of the committee. No such funds may be used to influence either state or federal legislation or rule making.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 17.
44-19-118. Change or termination of assessment — Petition — Referendum.
Upon written petition duly signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the producers affected by the assessment, the commissioner shall, in accordance with the procedure established in §§ 44-19-109 — 44-19-112, conduct a referendum to determine whether the producers assent to a change of the assessment or to terminate the assessment. The producers shall be deemed to have assented to a change of the assessment or termination of assessment if a majority of those voting vote in favor of the change or termination.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 18.
Cross-References. Simple majority, § 44-19-108.
44-19-119. Reports — Information — Audits.
- The commissioner may require purchasers to file such information and reports as may be reasonably necessary to assist in carrying out the purposes of this chapter.
- The Tennessee dairy promotion committee shall prepare an annual report of its activities through June 30 of each year, and submit this report to the commissioner.
- The annual report and all books of accounts and financial records of all funds received by assessment shall be subject to audit annually by the comptroller of the treasury. The audit may be performed by a licensed independent public accountant selected by the committee and approved by the comptroller of the treasury. The cost of any audit shall be paid by the committee. The comptroller of the treasury shall ensure that audits are prepared in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards and determine if the audits meet minimum audit standards prescribed by the comptroller of the treasury. No audit may be accepted as meeting the requirements of this section until approved by the comptroller of the treasury.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 19.
44-19-120. Promulgation of rules and regulations.
The commissioner may make and promulgate such rules and regulations in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions and intent of this chapter.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 20.
44-19-121. Orders and injunctions restraining violations — Unpaid assessments.
- Whenever in the judgment of the commissioner or the Tennessee dairy promotion committee on recommendation to the commissioner, a purchaser is engaged in or is about to engage in any acts or practices that constitute a violation of any of the sections of this chapter, the commissioner may make application to a court of appropriate jurisdiction for an order enjoining the act or acts or practices and obtain a restraining order and preliminary injunction against the violation.
- Any due and payable assessment shall constitute a personal debt of every person who is liable and the same sum shall be due and payable to the committee. In the event any person fails to pay the full amount of the person's assessment before the due date, the commissioner may add to the unpaid assessment an amount not exceeding ten percent (10%) of the amount due to defray the cost of enforcing collection. In the event any person fails to pay any due and payable assessment, the commissioner may bring a civil action against that person for collection, together with the above specified ten percent (10%).
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 21.
44-19-122. Termination of assessments and chapter.
If there is a termination of assessments pursuant to the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-180), this chapter shall be null and void.
Acts 1984, ch. 948, § 22.
Compiler's Notes. The Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-180) is codified as 608, 1314, 1379, 1421, 1427, 1445, 1446, 4501-4514, and 4531.
Chapter 20
Equine Activities — Liability
44-20-101. Legislative findings and intent.
The general assembly recognizes that persons who participate in equine activities may incur injuries as a result of the risks involved in such activities. The general assembly also finds that the state and its citizens derive numerous economic and personal benefits from these activities. It is, therefore, the intent of the general assembly to encourage equine activities by limiting the civil liability of those involved in such activities.
Acts 1992, ch. 974, § 2.
Law Reviews.
The New Equine Liability Statutes (Terence J. Centner), 62 Tenn. L. Rev. 997 (1995).
Comparative Legislation. Liability for injury or death resulting from equine activity:
Ga. O.C.G.A. § 4-12-1 et seq.
Va. Code § 3.1-796.130 et seq.
Cited: Teles v. Big Rock Stables, L.P., 419 F. Supp. 2d 1003, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13035 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2006).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Interpretation.
Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-101 et seq., must be strictly construed, since it is in derogation of common law; the legislature has indicated in the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-101, that it intends to limit the civil liability of those involved in certain kinds of activities that involve horses because of known risks associated with such animals, not that it intends to totally eliminate such liability, and thus, a court may not construe the Act in a way that reduced civil liability beyond the limits expressly contained in the Act or required by necessary implication from its provisions. Smith v. Phillips, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 228 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2010).
Collateral References. 65A C.J.S. Negligence § 234.
Validity, Construction, and Application of Statutory Exemptions from Liability for Persons Injured by Equine or Equestrian Activities. 79 A.L.R.6th 487.
Animals 111.1.
44-20-102. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
- “Engages in an equine activity” means riding, training, assisting in medical treatment of, driving, or being a passenger upon an equine, whether mounted or unmounted or any person assisting a participant or show management.
- “Engages in an equine activity” does not include being a spectator at an equine activity, except in cases where the spectator places the spectator's person in an unauthorized area and in immediate proximity to the equine activity;
- “Equine” means a horse, pony, mule, donkey, or hinny;
-
“Equine activity” means:
- Equine shows, fairs, competitions, performances, or parades that involve any or all breeds of equines and any of the equine disciplines, including, but not limited to, dressage, hunter and jumper horse shows, grand prix jumping, three-day events, combined training, rodeos, driving, pulling, cutting, polo, steeplechasing, English and western performance riding, endurance trail riding and western games, and hunting;
- Equine training or teaching activities, or both;
- Boarding equines;
- Riding, inspecting, or evaluating an equine belonging to another, whether or not the owner has received some monetary consideration or other thing of value for the use of the equine or is permitting a prospective purchaser of the equine to ride, inspect, or evaluate the equine;
- Rides, trips, hunts, or other equine activities of any type, however informal or impromptu, that are sponsored by an equine activity sponsor; and
- Placing or replacing horseshoes on an equine;
- “Equine activity sponsor” means an individual, group, club, partnership, or corporation, whether or not the sponsor is operating for profit or nonprofit, that sponsors, organizes, or provides the facilities for an equine activity, including, but not limited to, pony clubs, 4-H clubs, hunt clubs, riding clubs, school and college-sponsored classes, programs and activities, therapeutic riding programs, and operators, instructors, and promoters of equine facilities, including, but not limited to, stables, clubhouses, ponyride strings, fairs, and arenas at which the activity is held;
-
“Equine professional” means a person engaged for compensation:
- In instructing a participant or renting to a participant an equine for the purpose of riding, driving, or being a passenger upon the equine; or
- In renting equipment or tack to a participant;
-
“Inherent risks of equine activities” means those dangers or conditions that are an integral part of equine activities, including, but not limited to:
- The propensity of an equine to behave in ways that may result in injury, harm, or death to persons on or around them;
- The unpredictability of an equine's reaction to such things as sounds, sudden movements, and unfamiliar objects, persons, or other animals;
- Certain hazards such as surface and subsurface conditions;
- Collisions with other equines or objects; and
- The potential of a participant to act in a negligent manner that may contribute to injury to the participant or others, such as failing to maintain control over the animal or not acting within the participant's ability; and
- “Participant” means any person, whether amateur or professional, who engages in an equine activity, whether or not a fee is paid to participate in the equine activity.
Acts 1992, ch. 974, § 3.
Cited: Teles v. Big Rock Stables, L.P., 419 F. Supp. 2d 1003, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13035 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2006); H & R Block E. Tax Servs. v. Dep't of Commerce & Industry, Div. of Ins., 267 S.W.3d 848, 2008 Tenn. App. LEXIS 53 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2008).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Immunity.
Because immunity from liability under the Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-103, attaches to injuries resulting from the inherent risks of “equine activities” it is the definition of that term that must be considered in applying the statutory immunity; the purpose of the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-102(1), is not to expand the definition of “equine activity” beyond the limits set out in § 44-2-102(3) but rather to draw a clear distinction between those with an active connection with such activities, and those who merely observe them. Smith v. Phillips, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 228 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2010).
In a rider's action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when an owner's horse bit him, the trial court erred in granting the owner summary judgment on the ground that he was entitled to immunity under the Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-103, because the activity the rider engaged in was a social horseback outing among friends who owned horses, and it did not meet the statutory definition of “equine activities” under the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-102(3); the terms used by the legislature to describe a sponsor in the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-101(4), make it clear that the intent is to cover those entities or individuals engaged in regular events or programs, generally open to the public or to members, that promote equine activities, which is the purpose of providing immunity. Smith v. Phillips, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 228 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2010).
Collateral References.
Validity, Construction, and Application of Statutory Exemptions from Liability for Persons Injured by Equine or Equestrian Activities. 79 A.L.R.6th 487.
44-20-103. Limitation on liability for injury or death of participant.
Except as provided in § 44-20-104, an equine activity sponsor, an equine professional, or any other person, which shall include a corporation or partnership, shall not be liable for an injury to or the death of a participant resulting from the inherent risks of equine activities. Except as provided in § 44-20-104, no participant or participant's representative shall make any claim against, maintain an action against, or recover from an equine activity sponsor, an equine professional, or any other person for injury, loss, damage, or death of the participant resulting from any of the inherent risks of equine activities.
Acts 1992, ch. 974, § 4.
Cited: Teles v. Big Rock Stables, L.P., 419 F. Supp. 2d 1003, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13035 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2006).
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Immunity.
Because immunity from liability under the Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-103, attaches to injuries resulting from the inherent risks of “equine activities” it is the definition of that term that must be considered in applying the statutory immunity; the purpose of the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-102(1), is not to expand the definition of “equine activity” beyond the limits set out in § 44-2-102(3) but rather to draw a clear distinction between those with an active connection with such activities, and those who merely observe them. Smith v. Phillips, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 228 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2010).
In a rider's action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when an owner's horse bit him, the trial court erred in granting the owner summary judgment on the ground that he was entitled to immunity under the Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-103, because the activity the rider engaged in was a social horseback outing among friends who owned horses, and it did not meet the statutory definition of “equine activities” under the Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-102(3), and therefore, the immunity created in § 44-20-103, did not apply; based on the language of the Act, the legislature does not intend that immunity would apply to a social ride among horse owners who are friends. Smith v. Phillips, — S.W.3d —, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 228 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2010).
Collateral References.
Validity, Construction, and Application of Statutory Exemptions from Liability for Persons Injured by Equine or Equestrian Activities. 79 A.L.R.6th 487.
44-20-104. Applicability — Where liability not prevented or limited.
- This chapter shall not apply to the horse racing industry as regulated in title 4, chapter 36.
-
Nothing in § 44-20-103 shall prevent or limit the liability of an equine activity sponsor, an equine professional, or any other person if the equine activity sponsor, equine professional, or person:
-
- Provided the equipment or tack, and knew or should have known that the equipment or tack was faulty, and the equipment or tack was faulty to the extent that it did cause the injury; or
- Provided the equine and failed to make reasonable and prudent efforts to determine the ability of the participant to engage safely in the equine activity and determine the ability of the participant to safely manage the particular equine based on the participant's representations of the participant's ability;
- Owns, leases, rents, or otherwise is in lawful possession and control of the land or facilities upon which the participant sustained injuries because of a dangerous latent condition that was known to the equine activity sponsor, equine professional, or person and for which warning signs have not been conspicuously posted;
- Commits an act or omission that constitutes willful or wanton disregard for the safety of the participant, and that act or omission caused the injury; or
- Intentionally injures the participant.
-
-
Nothing in § 44-20-103 shall prevent or limit the liability of an equine activity sponsor or an equine professional:
- Under product liability provisions in title 29, chapter 28; or
- Under trespass provisions in chapter 8 of this title.
- Title 70, chapter 7 does not apply to an equine activity sponsor or an equine professional. It is the legislative intent that equine activity sponsors and equine professionals be held to a higher standard of care.
Acts 1992, ch. 974, § 5.
NOTES TO DECISIONS
1. Summary Judgment.
Defendants were denied summary judgment in a personal injury suit filed by an injured horseback rider, in part, because it was not clear, based on the allegations in the rider's complaint, that the Tennessee Equine Activities Act, T.C.A. § 44-20-101 et seq., provides immunity to defendants in the suit. Disputed issues of material fact existed as to whether the rider's fall was the result of an inherent risk of horseback riding, which would be covered by the act, or whether her injuries resulted from the provision of faulty tack and/or from defendants' willful disregard for the rider's safety, both of which are exempted from statutory protection under T.C.A. § 44-20-104. Teles v. Big Rock Stables, L.P., 419 F. Supp. 2d 1003, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13035 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 27, 2006).
Collateral References.
Validity, Construction, and Application of Statutory Exemptions from Liability for Persons Injured by Equine or Equestrian Activities. 79 A.L.R.6th 487.
44-20-105. Warning signs and notice.
- Every equine professional shall post and maintain signs that contain the warning notice specified in subsection (b). The signs shall be placed in clearly visible locations on or near stables, corrals, or arenas where the equine professional conducts equine activities if the stables, corrals, or arenas are owned, managed, or controlled by the equine professional. The warning notice specified in subsection (b) shall appear on the sign in black letters, with each letter to be a minimum of one inch (1") in height. Every written contract entered into by an equine professional for the providing of professional services, instruction, or the rental of equipment or tack or an equine to a participant, whether or not the contract involves equine activities on or off the location or site of the equine professional's business, shall contain in clearly readable print the warning notice specified in subsection (b).
-
The signs and contracts described in subsection (a) shall contain the following warning notice:
WARNING
Under Tennessee Law, an equine professional is not liable for an injury to or the death of a participant in equine activities resulting from the inherent risks of equine activities, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated, title 44, chapter 20.
Acts 1992, ch. 974, § 6.
Collateral References.
Validity, Construction, and Application of Statutory Exemptions from Liability for Persons Injured by Equine or Equestrian Activities. 79 A.L.R.6th 487.
Chapter 21
Liability of Bovine Owners
44-21-101. Chapter definitions.
As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
-
“Bovine activity” means any activity involving one (1) or more bovine, including, but not limited to:
- Grazing, herding, feeding, branding, milking or any other activity that involves the care or maintenance of bovine;
- Bovine shows, fairs, competitions or auctions;
- Bovine training or teaching activities;
- Boarding bovine; or
- Riding, inspecting, or evaluating bovine;
- “Bovine owner” means any person with ownership rights to bovine;
-
“Inherent risks of bovine activities” means dangers or conditions that are an integral part of bovine activities, including, but not limited to:
- The propensity of a bovine to behave in ways that may result in injury, loss, damage or death to persons on or around the bovine;
- The unpredictability of a bovine's reaction to sounds, sudden movements, and unfamiliar objects, persons, or other animals;
- Certain hazards on the property, such as surface and subsurface conditions; or
- Collisions with other bovine or objects; and
- “Person” means an individual, corporation or any other legal entity.
Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 1.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 2. April 14, 2011.
44-21-102. No liability for inherent risks of bovine activities.
- A bovine owner shall not be liable for any injury, loss, damage, or death of a person resulting from the inherent risks of bovine activities.
- Except as provided in § 44-21-103, no person shall make any claim against, maintain an action against, or recover from a bovine owner for injury, loss, damage, or death of the person resulting from the inherent risks of bovine activities.
Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 1.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 2. April 14, 2011.
44-21-103. Bovine owner activities that preclude limitations on liability.
-
Nothing in § 44-21-102 shall prevent or limit the liability of a bovine owner if the owner:
- Fails to post and maintain warning signs pursuant to § 44-21-104(a);
- Fails to maintain proper fences and enclosures pursuant to chapter 8 of this title; or
- Commits an act or omission that constitutes willful or wanton disregard for the safety of the person, and that act or omission caused the injury, loss, damage, or death.
- Title 70, chapter 7 shall not apply to a bovine owner if the injury, loss, damage or death resulted from a bovine activity.
Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 1.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 2. April 14, 2011.
44-21-104. Warning signs.
- A bovine owner shall post and maintain signs that contain the warning notice specified in subsection (b). The signs shall be placed in clearly visible locations on or near stables, corrals, fences, enclosures or arenas where the owner conducts bovine activities. The warning notice specified in subsection (b) shall appear on the sign in black letters, with each letter to be a minimum of one inch (1") in height.
-
The signs described in subsection (a) shall contain the following warning notice:
WARNING
Under Tennessee Law, a bovine owner is not liable for any injury, loss, damage, or death of a person resulting from the inherent risks of bovine activities, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated, title 44, chapter 21.
Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 1.
Effective Dates. Acts 2011, ch. 74, § 2. April 14, 2011.