Chapter 45 THE MEDICAL CONSENT AND NATURAL DEATH ACT

Sec.

§ 39-4501. Purposes — Application.

  1. The primary purposes of this chapter are:
    1. To provide and codify Idaho law concerning consent for the furnishing of hospital, medical, dental, surgical and other health care, treatment or procedures, and concerning what constitutes an informed consent for such health care, treatment or procedures; and
    2. To provide certainty and clarity in the law of medical consent in the furtherance of high standards of health care and its ready availability in proper cases.
  2. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to amend or repeal the provisions of chapter 3 or chapter 4, title 66, Idaho Code, as those provisions pertain to hospitalization or commitment of people with mental illness or developmental disability or the powers of guardians of developmentally disabled persons, nor the provisions of chapter 6, title 18, Idaho Code, pertaining to the provision of examinations, prescriptions, devices and informational materials regarding prevention of pregnancy or pertaining to therapeutic abortions and consent to the performance thereof.
  3. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit or require the provision of health care for a patient in contravention of the patient’s stated or implied objection thereto upon religious grounds nor shall anything in this chapter be construed to require the granting of permission for or on behalf of any patient who is not able to act for himself by his parent, spouse or guardian in violation of the religious beliefs of the patient or the patient’s parent or spouse.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4501, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2006, ch. 214, § 1, p. 645; am. 2007, ch. 196, § 1, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 1, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4501, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4501, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 214, deleted “medical attendance upon or” preceding “hospitalization” in subsection (2).

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, inserted “or chapter 4” in subsection (2).

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, substituted “surgical and other health care” for “or surgical care” and substituted “for such health care” for “for such care” in paragraph (1)(a) and substituted “hospitalization or commitment of people with mental illness or developmental disability or the powers of guardians of developmentally disabled persons” for “hospitalization of the mentally ill” in subsection (2).

§ 39-4502. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Advanced practice professional nurse” (APPN) means a professional nurse licensed in this state who has gained additional specialized knowledge, skills and experience through a nationally accredited program of study as defined by section 54-1402, Idaho Code, and is authorized to perform advanced nursing practice, which may include direct client care such as assessing, diagnosing, planning and prescribing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic and corrective measures, health promotion and preventive care as defined by rules of the board of nursing. The advanced practice professional nurse collaborates with other health professionals in providing health care.
  2. “Artificial life-sustaining procedure” means any medical procedure or intervention that utilizes mechanical means to sustain or supplant a vital function which, when applied to a qualified patient, would serve only to artificially prolong life. “Artificial life-sustaining procedure” does not include the administration of pain management medication or the performance of any medical procedure deemed necessary to provide comfort care or to alleviate pain.
  3. “Artificial nutrition and hydration” means supplying food and water through a conduit, such as a tube or intravenous line, where the recipient is not required to chew or swallow voluntarily, but does not include assisted feeding, such as spoon feeding or bottle feeding.
  4. “Attending physician” means the physician licensed by the state board of medicine who is selected by, or assigned to, the patient and who has primary responsibility for the treatment and care of the patient.
  5. “Cardiopulmonary resuscitation” or “CPR” means measures to restore cardiac function and/or to support ventilation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest.
  6. “Comfort care” means treatment and care to provide comfort and cleanliness. “Comfort care” includes:
    1. Oral and body hygiene;
    2. Reasonable efforts to offer food and fluids orally;
    3. Medication, positioning, warmth, appropriate lighting and other measures to relieve pain and suffering; and
    4. Privacy and respect for the dignity and humanity of the patient.
  7. “Consent to care” includes refusal to consent to care and/or withdrawal of care.
  8. “Directive,” “advance directive” or “health care directive” means a document that substantially meets the requirements of section 39-4510(1), Idaho Code, or is a “Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment” (POST) form or is another document which represents a competent person’s authentic expression of such person’s wishes concerning his or her health care.
  9. “Emergency medical services personnel” means personnel engaged in providing initial emergency medical assistance including, but not limited to, first responders, emergency medical technicians and paramedics.
  10. “Health care provider” or “provider” means any person or entity licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized by law to administer health care in the ordinary course of business or practice of a profession, including emergency or other medical services personnel. (11) “Persistent vegetative state” means an irreversible state that has been medically confirmed by a neurological specialist who is an expert in the examination of nonresponsive individuals in which the person has intact brain stem function but no higher cortical function and no awareness of self or environment.
  11. “Persistent vegetative state” means an irreversible state that has been medically confirmed by a neurological specialist who is an expert in the examination of nonresponsive individuals in which the person has intact brain stem function but no higher cortical function and no awareness of self or environment.
  12. “Physician” means a person who holds a current active license to practice medicine and surgery or osteopathic medicine and surgery in Idaho and is in good standing with no restriction upon or actions taken against his or her license.
  13. “Physician assistant” (PA) means any person, as defined in section 54-1803, Idaho Code, who is qualified by specialized education, training, experience and personal character and who has been licensed by the board of medicine to render patient services under the direction of a supervising and alternate supervising physician.
  14. “Physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form” means a form that satisfies the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code.
  15. “Physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) identification device” means standardized jewelry which can be worn around the wrist, neck or ankle, and which has been approved by the department of health and welfare. Such jewelry shall be issued only to persons who have a POST form complying with section 39-4512A, Idaho Code, stating that such person has chosen “Do Not Resuscitate: Allow Natural Death (No Code/DNR/DNAR): No CPR or advanced cardiac life support interventions” or the equivalent choice.
  16. “Surrogate decision maker” means the person authorized to consent to or refuse health care for another person as specified in section 39-4504(1), Idaho Code.
  17. “Terminal condition” means an incurable or irreversible condition which, without the administration of life-sustaining procedures, will, in the opinion of a physician, result in death if it runs its usual course.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4502, as added by 2007, ch. 196, § 2, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 2, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4502, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4502, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228, am. 1986, ch. 71, § 1, p. 196; am. 1988, c. 262, § 1, p. 508, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, added subsections (1), (13), and (16) and renumbered the subsequent subsections accordingly; in subsection (8), inserted “advance directive’”, substituted “that substantially meets” for “meeting”, deleted “signed by a physician” following “form”, and added the ending beginning “or is another document”; in subsection (14), substituted “means a form that satisfies the requirements of section 39-4512A” for “means a standardized form containing orders by a physician that states a person’s treatment wishes”; and added the second sentence in subsection (15). Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4502 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4503 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 3.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4503. Persons who may consent to their own care.

Any person, including one who is developmentally disabled and not a respondent as defined in section 66-402, Idaho Code, who comprehends the need for, the nature of and the significant risks ordinarily inherent in any contemplated hospital, medical, dental, surgical or other health care, treatment or procedure is competent to consent thereto on his or her own behalf. Any health care provider may provide such health care and services in reliance upon such a consent if the consenting person appears to the health care provider securing the consent to possess such requisite comprehension at the time of giving the consent.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4502, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 3, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 3, p. 825; am. 2017, ch. 273, § 1, p. 713.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4503, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4503, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. 1986, ch. 71, § 2, p. 196; am. 1988, ch. 262, § 2, p. 508; am. 2001, ch. 27, § 1, p. 32, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4502 and in the last sentence, twice substituted “health care provider” for “physician, dentist, hospital or other duly authorized person” and “physician or dentist,” respectively.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, substituted “Any person who comprehends” for “Any person of ordinary intelligence and awareness sufficient for him or her generally to comprehend” near the beginning and substituted “surgical and other health care” for “or surgical care” near the end of the first sentence and substituted “comprehension” for “intelligence and awareness” in the second sentence.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 273, inserted “including one who is developmentally disabled and not a respondent as defined in section 66-402, Idaho Code” near the beginning of the first sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4503 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4504 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 4.

§ 39-4504. Persons who may give consent to care for others.

  1. Consent for the furnishing of hospital, medical, dental, surgical or other health care, treatment or procedures to any person who is not then capable of giving such consent as provided in this chapter or who is a minor may be given or refused in the order of priority set forth hereafter; provided however, that the surrogate decision maker shall have sufficient comprehension as required to consent to his or her own health care pursuant to the provisions of section 39-4503, Idaho Code; and provided further that the surrogate decision maker shall not have authority to consent to or refuse health care contrary to such person’s advance directives, POST or wishes expressed by such person while the person was capable of consenting to his or her own health care:
    1. The court appointed guardian of such person;
    2. The person named in another person’s “Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care” pursuant to section 39-4510, Idaho Code, or a similar document authorized by this chapter if the conditions in such living will for authorizing the agent to act have been satisfied;
    3. If married, the spouse of such person;
    4. An adult child of such person;
    5. A parent of such person;
    6. The person named in a delegation of parental authority executed pursuant to section 15-5-104, Idaho Code;
    7. Any relative of such person who represents himself or herself to be an appropriate, responsible person to act under the circumstances;
    8. Any other competent individual representing himself or herself to be responsible for the health care of such person; or
  2. No person who, in good faith, gives consent or authorization for the provision of hospital, medical, dental, surgical or other health care, treatment or procedures to another person as provided by this chapter shall be subject to civil liability therefor.
  3. No health care provider who, in good faith, obtains consent from a person pursuant to either section 39-4503 or 39-4504(1), Idaho Code, shall be subject to civil liability therefor.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4503, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 4, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 4, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4504, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4504, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. 1986, ch. 71, § 3, p. 196, was repealed by S.L. 1988, ch. 262, § 3.

A former§ 39-4504, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4504, as added by 1988, ch. 262, § 4, p. 508; am. 2001, ch. 27, § 2, p. 32; am. 2004, ch. 56, § 1, p. 258, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4503 and in subsection (1)(g), inserted “and the subject person has not communicated and is unable to communicate his or her treatment wishes” near the middle; and in subsection (3), substituted “health care provider” for “physician, dentist, hospital or other duly authorized person,” and corrected the section references.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, in subsection (1), rewrote the introductory paragraph, adding the two provisos; substituted “court appointed” for “legal” in paragraph (a), added “if the conditions in such living will for authorizing the agent to act have been satisfied” in paragraph (b), added paragraphs (d) and (f), redesignating the subsequent paragraphs, and substituted “health care provider” for “physician or dentist” twice in paragraph (i); and, in subsection (2), inserted “or other health” and substituted “to another person” for “to another.”

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4504 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4505 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 5.

§ 39-4505. Blood testing.

  1. A physician may consent to ordering tests of a patient’s or a deceased person’s blood or other body fluids for the presence of blood-transmitted or body fluid-transmitted viruses or diseases without the prior consent of the patient if:
    1. There has been or is likely to be a significant exposure to the patient’s or a deceased person’s blood or body fluids by a person providing emergency or medical services to such patient which may result in the transmittal of a virus or disease; and
    2. The patient is unconscious or incapable of giving informed consent and the physician is unable to obtain consent pursuant to section 39-4504, Idaho Code.
  2. The department of health and welfare shall promulgate rules identifying the blood-transmitted or body fluid-transmitted viruses or diseases for which blood tests or body fluid tests can be ordered under this section and defining the term “significant exposure” as provided in this section.
  3. Results of tests conducted under this section which confirm the presence of a blood-transmitted or body fluid-transmitted virus or disease shall be reported to the director of the department of health and welfare in the name of the patient or deceased person. The department records containing such test results shall be used only by public health officials who must conduct investigations. The exposed person shall only be informed of the results of the test and shall not be informed of the name of the patient or deceased person. Protocols shall be established by hospitals to maintain confidentiality while disseminating the necessary test result information to persons who may have a significant exposure to blood or other body fluids and to maintain records of such tests to preserve the confidentiality of the test results.
  4. Any person who willfully or maliciously discloses the results of a test conducted under this section, except pursuant to a written authorization by the person whose blood was tested or by such person’s authorized representative, or as otherwise authorized by law, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4504, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 5, p. 579.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4505, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4505, as added by 1988, ch. 262, § 5, p. 508; am. 2004, ch. 56, § 2, p. 258, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4504 and updated the section reference in subsection (1)(b).

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4505 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4506 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 6.

§ 39-4506. Sufficiency of consent.

Consent, or refusal to consent, for the furnishing of health care, treatment or procedures shall be valid in all respects if the person giving or refusing the consent is sufficiently aware of pertinent facts respecting the need for, the nature of, and the significant risks ordinarily attendant upon such a person receiving such care, as to permit the giving or withholding of such consent to be a reasonably informed decision. Any such consent shall be deemed valid and so informed if the health care provider to whom it is given or by whom it is secured has made such disclosures and given such advice respecting pertinent facts and considerations as would ordinarily be made and given under the same or similar circumstances, by a like health care provider of good standing practicing in the same community. As used in this section, the term “in the same community” refers to that geographic area ordinarily served by the licensed general hospital at or nearest to which such consent is given.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4505, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 6, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 5, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4506, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4505, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. and redesig. 1988, ch. 262, § 6, p. 508, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4505 and inserted “or refusal to consent” and “or refusing” near the beginning.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, substituted “health care” for “hospital, medical, dental or surgical care” near the beginning of the first sentence and substituted “health care provider” for “physician or dentist” twice in the second sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4506 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4507 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 7.

CASE NOTES

Objective Medical-Community Standard.

There was insufficient evidence that a dentist failed to adequately inform a patient about a “silver crown” procedure. There was no evidence that a dentist in good standing, under the circumstances, would have apprised the patient of the obscure semantic distinction between a “crown” and an “amalgam buildup” or “amalgam crown.” Peckham v. Idaho State Bd. of Dentistry, 154 Idaho 846, 303 P.3d 205 (2013).

Decisions Under Prior Law
Analysis
Basis for Claim.

To establish a claim based on the doctrine of informed consent, a patient must prove three basic elements: nondisclosure, causation and injury. In order to show causation, the patient must prove that, if he had been informed of the material risks, he would not have consented to the procedure, and that he had been injured as a result of submitting to the medical procedure. Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011).

Consent Not Established.

The verified affidavit of the defendant physician, in which he testified as to his familiarity with the applicable standard of health care and his compliance therewith, was held insufficient to establish consent and entitle him to judgment as a matter of law. Rook v. Trout, 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), overruled on other grounds, Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011).

Defenses.

Those portions of Rook v. Trout , 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), which held that this section merely provides alternative defenses to a claim of lack of informed consent, and which held that the statute provides for a subjective patient-based standard of disclosure for informed consent are overruled; this section sets forth and requires an objective medical-community standard for determining whether a patient has been adequately informed prior to giving consent for medical treatment. Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011).

Nature of Disclosure.
Objective Medical-Community Standard.

A valid consent must be preceded by the physician disclosing those pertinent facts to the patient so that he or she is sufficiently aware of the need for, the nature of, and the significant risks ordinarily involved in the treatment to be provided, in order that the giving or withholding of consent be a reasonably informed decision. The requisite pertinent facts to be disclosed to the patient are those which would be given by a like physician of good standing practicing in the same community. Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011). Objective Medical-Community Standard.

The interpretation of this section as set forth in Rook v. Trout , 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), is contrary to the clear meaning and intent of the express language contained in the statute. The language of this section clearly and expressly establishes an objective medical-community standard, not a subjective patient-based standard. Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011).

Purpose.

The doctrine of informed consent is the general principle of law that a physician has a duty to disclose to his patient those risks of injury which might result from a proposed course of treatment. Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Verska v. St. Alphonsus Med. Ctr., — Idaho —, — P.3d —, 2011 Ida. LEXIS 149 (Nov. 9, 2011).

Responsibility of Hospital.

Since the responsibility for informed consent regarding health care is statutorily placed upon the physician or dentist, a hospital has no responsibility for consent. Keyser v. St. Mary’s Hosp., 662 F. Supp. 191 (D. Idaho 1987).

§ 39-4507. Form of consent.

It is not essential to the validity of any consent for the furnishing of hospital, medical, dental or surgical care, treatment or procedures that the consent be in writing or any other specific form of expression; provided however, when the giving of such consent is recited or documented in writing and expressly authorizes the care, treatment or procedures to be furnished, and when such writing or form has been executed or initialed by a person competent to give such consent for himself or another, such written consent, in the absence of convincing proof that it was secured maliciously or by fraud, is presumed to be valid for the furnishing of such care, treatment or procedures, and the advice and disclosures of the attending physician or dentist, as well as the level of informed awareness of the giver of such consent, shall be presumed to be sufficient.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4506, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 7, p. 579.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4507, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4506, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. 1986, ch. 71, § 4, p. 196; am. and redesig. 1988, ch. 262, § 7, p. 508; am. 2004, ch. 56, § 3, p. 258, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4506 and inserted “specific” preceding “form of expression.”

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4507 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4508 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 8.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Challenge to Presumption.

Where a written consent is signed, this section states that the advice and level of informed awareness are only “presumed sufficient.” To challenge this, the plaintiff need not establish by convincing proof that the consent was secured maliciously or by fraud. Rook v. Trout, 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), overruled on other grounds, Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991).

Where plaintiff was challenging only the “advice and disclosures” and the “level of informed awareness,” he was only required to overcome an ordinary presumption as to the sufficiency of consent. Rook v. Trout, 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), overruled on other grounds, Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991).

Convincing Proof.

The “convincing proof” requirement of this section applies only to challenges regarding whether the patient consented to the furnishing of medical care, not to challenges to the sufficiency of the advice and disclosures and the level of informed awareness. Rook v. Trout, 113 Idaho 652, 747 P.2d 61 (1987), overruled on other grounds, Sherwood v. Carter, 119 Idaho 246, 805 P.2d 452 (1991).

Where the record totally lacked any allegations that had a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s position been adequately informed, that person would not have consented to the surgery, the court properly granted summary judgment to doctors in patient’s malpractice action. Anderson v. Hollingsworth, 136 Idaho 800, 41 P.3d 228 (2001).

§ 39-4508. Responsibility for consent and documentation.

Obtaining sufficient consent for health care is the duty of the attending health care provider upon whose order or at whose direction the contemplated health care, treatment or procedure is rendered; provided however, a licensed hospital and any employee of a health care provider, acting with the approval of such an attending or other individual health care provider, may perform the ministerial act of documenting such consent by securing the completion and execution of a form or statement in which the giving of consent for such care is documented by or on behalf of the person. In performing such a ministerial act, the hospital or health care provider employee shall not be deemed to have engaged in the practice of medicine or dentistry.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4507, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 8, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 6, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Another former§ 39-4508, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4507, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. and redesig. 1988, ch. 262, § 8, p. 508, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4507 and twice deleted “lay or professional” following “dental office.”

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, in the first sentence, substituted “Obtaining sufficient consent for health care is the duty of the attending health care provider upon whose order or at whose direction the contemplated health care, treatment or procedure is rendered” for “Obtaining consent for health care is the duty of the attending physician or dentist or of another physician or dentist acting on his or her behalf or actually providing the contemplated care, treatment or procedure,” substituted “employee of a health care provider” for “medical or dental office employee,” and substituted “individual health care provider” for “physician or dentist”; and substituted “health care provider employee” for “medical or dental office employee” in the last sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4508 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4509 by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 9.

CASE NOTES

Decisions Under Prior Law
Hospital.

Since the responsibility for informed consent regarding health care is statutorily placed upon the physician or dentist, a hospital has no responsibility for consent. Keyser v. St. Mary’s Hosp., 662 F. Supp. 191 (D. Idaho 1987).

§ 39-4509. Statement of policy — Definition.

For purposes of sections 39-4509 through 39-4515, Idaho Code:

  1. The legislature recognizes the established common law and the fundamental right of competent persons to control the decisions relating to the rendering of their medical care, including the decision to have life-sustaining procedures withheld or withdrawn. The legislature further finds that modern medical technology has made possible the artificial prolongation of human life beyond natural limits. The legislature further finds that persons are sometimes unable to express their desire to withhold or withdraw such artificial life prolongation procedures which provide nothing medically necessary or beneficial to the person because of the person’s inability to communicate with the health care provider.
  2. In recognition of the dignity and privacy which persons have a right to expect, the legislature hereby declares that the laws of this state shall recognize the right of a competent person to have his or her wishes for medical treatment and for the withdrawal of artificial life-sustaining procedures carried out even though that person is no longer able to communicate with the health care provider.
  3. It is the intent of the legislature to establish an effective means for such communication. It is not the intent of the legislature that the procedures described in sections 39-4509 through 39-4515, Idaho Code, are the only effective means of such communication, and nothing in sections 39-4509 through 39-4515, Idaho Code, shall impair or supersede any legal right or legal responsibility which a person may have to effect the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining procedures in any lawful manner, provided that this sentence shall not be construed to authorize any violation of section 39-4514(3), Idaho Code. Any authentic expression of a person’s wishes with respect to health care should be honored.
  4. “Competent person” means any person who meets the requirements of section 39-4503, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4508, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. and redesig. 2007, ch. 196, § 9, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 7, p. 825; am. 2012, ch. 305, § 1, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4509, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4508, as added by 1977, ch. 106, § 1, p. 228; am. and redesig. 1988, ch. 262, § 9, p. 508, was repealed by S.L. 2005, ch. 120, § 1.

Another former§ 39-4509, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-4509, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2006, ch. 67, § 2, p. 199, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 196, § 10.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, redesignated the section from§ 39-4508 and added “definition” in the section catchline; corrected the section references in the introductory language; in subsection (1), substituted “recognizes the established common law and the fundamental right of adult persons” for “finds that adult persons have the fundamental right”; in subsection (3), twice substituted the section references for “this chapter”; and added subsection (4). This section was amended by two 2012 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, in subsections (1) and (2), substituted “person” or a variant thereof for “patient” or a variant thereof and substituted “health care provider” for “physician” twice; and substituted “who meets the requirements of section 39-4503, Idaho Code” for “emancipated minor or person eighteen (18) or more years of age who is of sound mind” in subsection (4).

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 305, added the proviso at the end of the second sentence in subsection (3).

§ 39-4510. Living will and durable power of attorney for health care.

  1. Any competent person may execute a document known as a “Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care.” Such document shall be in substantially the following form, or in another form that contains the elements set forth in this chapter. Any portions of the “Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care” which are left blank by the person executing the document shall be deemed to be intentional and shall not invalidate the document.

LIVING WILL AND DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE

Date of Directive: ....................

Name of person executing Directive: ...............................

Address of person executing Directive: ...............................

A LIVING WILL A Directive to Withhold or to Provide Treatment

1 I willfully and voluntarily make known my desire that my life shall not be prolonged artificially under the circumstances set forth below. This Directive shall only be effective if I am unable to communicate my instructions and:

a I have an incurable or irreversible injury, disease, illness or condition, and a medical doctor who has examined me has certified:

1 That such injury, disease, illness or condition is terminal; and

2 That the application of artificial life-sustaining procedures would serve only to prolong artificially my life; and

3 That my death is imminent, whether or not artificial life-sustaining procedures are utilized; or

b I have been diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state.

In such event, I direct that the following marked expression of my intent be followed, and that I receive any medical treatment or care that may be required to keep me free of pain or distress.

Check one box and initial the line after such box:

........ I direct that all medical treatment, care and procedures necessary to restore my health and sustain my life be provided to me. Nutrition and hydration, whether artificial or nonartificial, shall not be withheld or withdrawn from me if I would likely die primarily from malnutrition or dehydration rather than from my injury, disease, illness or condition.

OR

........ I direct that all medical treatment, care and procedures, including artificial life-sustaining procedures, be withheld or withdrawn, except that nutrition and hydration, whether artificial or nonartificial shall not be withheld or withdrawn from me if, as a result, I would likely die primarily from malnutrition or dehydration rather than from my injury, disease, illness or condition, as follows: (If none of the following boxes are checked and initialed, then both nutrition and hydration, of any nature, whether artificial or nonartificial, shall be administered.) Check one box and initial the line after such box:

A ........       Only hydration of any nature, whether artificial or nonartificial, shall be administered;

B ........       Only nutrition, of any nature, whether artificial or nonartificial, shall be administered;

C ........       Both nutrition and hydration, of any nature, whether artificial or nonartificial shall be administered.

OR

........ I direct that all medical treatment, care and procedures be withheld or withdrawn, including withdrawal of the administration of artificial nutrition and hydration.

2 If I have been diagnosed as pregnant, this Directive shall have no force during the course of my pregnancy.

3 I understand the full importance of this Directive and am mentally competent to make this Directive. No participant in the making of this Directive or in its being carried into effect shall be held responsible in any way for complying with my directions.

4 Check one box and initial the line after such box:

........ I have discussed these decisions with my physician, advanced practice professional nurse or physician assistant and have also completed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form that contains directions that may be more specific than, but are compatible with, this Directive. I hereby approve of those orders and incorporate them herein as if fully set forth.

OR

........ I have not completed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form. If a POST form is later signed by my physician, advanced practice professional nurse or physician assistant, then this living will shall be deemed modified to be compatible with the terms of the POST form.

A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE

1 DESIGNATION OF HEALTH CARE AGENT. None of the following may be designated as your agent: (1) your treating health care provider; (2) a nonrelative employee of your treating health care provider; (3) an operator of a community care facility; or (4) a nonrelative employee of an operator of a community care facility. If the agent or an alternate agent designated in this Directive is my spouse, and our marriage is thereafter dissolved, such designation shall be thereupon revoked.

I do hereby designate and appoint the following individual as my attorney in fact (agent) to make health care decisions for me as authorized in this Directive. (Insert name, address and telephone number of one individual only as your agent to make health care decisions for you.)

Name of Health Care Agent: ...............................

Address of Health Care Agent: ...............................

Telephone Number of Health Care Agent: ...............................

For the purposes of this Directive, “health care decision” means consent, refusal of consent, or withdrawal of consent to any care, treatment, service or procedure to maintain, diagnose or treat an individual’s physical condition.

2 CREATION OF DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE. By this portion of this Directive, I create a durable power of attorney for health care. This power of attorney shall not be affected by my subsequent incapacity. This power shall be effective only when I am unable to communicate rationally. 3. GENERAL STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY GRANTED. I hereby grant to my agent full power and authority to make health care decisions for me to the same extent that I could make such decisions for myself if I had the capacity to do so. In exercising this authority, my agent shall make health care decisions that are consistent with my desires as stated in this Directive or otherwise made known to my agent including, but not limited to, my desires concerning obtaining or refusing or withdrawing artificial life-sustaining care, treatment, services and procedures, including such desires set forth in a living will, Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, or similar document executed by me, if any. (If you want to limit the authority of your agent to make health care decisions for you, you can state the limitations in paragraph 4 (“Statement of Desires, Special Provisions, and Limitations”) below. You can indicate your desires by including a statement of your desires in the same paragraph.)

3 GENERAL STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY GRANTED. I hereby grant to my agent full power and authority to make health care decisions for me to the same extent that I could make such decisions for myself if I had the capacity to do so. In exercising this authority, my agent shall make health care decisions that are consistent with my desires as stated in this Directive or otherwise made known to my agent including, but not limited to, my desires concerning obtaining or refusing or withdrawing artificial life-sustaining care, treatment, services and procedures, including such desires set forth in a living will, Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, or similar document executed by me, if any. (If you want to limit the authority of your agent to make health care decisions for you, you can state the limitations in paragraph 4 (“Statement of Desires, Special Provisions, and Limitations”) below. You can indicate your desires by including a statement of your desires in the same paragraph.)

4 STATEMENT OF DESIRES, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND LIMITATIONS. (Your agent must make health care decisions that are consistent with your known desires. You can, but are not required to, state your desires in the space provided below. You should consider whether you want to include a statement of your desires concerning artificial life-sustaining care, treatment, services and procedures. You can also include a statement of your desires concerning other matters relating to your health care, including a list of one or more persons whom you designate to be able to receive medical information about you and/or to be allowed to visit you in a medical institution. You can also make your desires known to your agent by discussing your desires with your agent or by some other means. If there are any types of treatment that you do not want to be used, you should state them in the space below. If you want to limit in any other way the authority given your agent by this Directive, you should state the limits in the space below. If you do not state any limits, your agent will have broad powers to make health care decisions for you, except to the extent that there are limits provided by law.) In exercising the authority under this durable power of attorney for health care, my agent shall act consistently with my desires as stated below and is subject to the special provisions and limitations stated in my Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, a living will, or similar document executed by me, if any. Additional statement of desires, special provisions, and limitations: ........ (You may attach additional pages or documents if you need more space to complete your statement.)

5 INSPECTION AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION RELATING TO MY PHYSICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH.

A General Grant of Power and Authority. Subject to any limitations in this Directive, my agent has the power and authority to do all of the following: (1) Request, review and receive any information, verbal or written, regarding my physical or mental health including, but not limited to, medical and hospital records; (2) Execute on my behalf any releases or other documents that may be required in order to obtain this information; (3) Consent to the disclosure of this information; and (4) Consent to the donation of any of my organs for medical purposes. (If you want to limit the authority of your agent to receive and disclose information relating to your health, you must state the limitations in paragraph 4 (“Statement of Desires, Special Provisions, and Limitations”) above.)

B HIPAA Release Authority. My agent shall be treated as I would be with respect to my rights regarding the use and disclosure of my individually identifiable health information or other medical records. This release authority applies to any information governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), 42 U.S.C. 1320d and 45 CFR 160 through 164. I authorize any physician, health care professional, dentist, health plan, hospital, clinic, laboratory, pharmacy, or other covered health care provider, any insurance company, and the MIB Group, Inc. (formerly the Medical Information Bureau, Inc.) or other health care clearinghouse that has provided treatment or services to me, or that has paid for or is seeking payment from me for such services, to give, disclose and release to my agent, without restriction, all of my individually identifiable health information and medical records regarding any past, present or future medical or mental health condition, including all information relating to the diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, mental illness, and drug or alcohol abuse. The authority given my agent shall supersede any other agreement that I may have made with my health care providers to restrict access to or disclosure of my individually identifiable health information. The authority given my agent has no expiration date and shall expire only in the event that I revoke the authority in writing and deliver it to my health care provider. 6. SIGNING DOCUMENTS, WAIVERS AND RELEASES. Where necessary to implement the health care decisions that my agent is authorized by this Directive to make, my agent has the power and authority to execute on my behalf all of the following: (a) Documents titled, or purporting to be, a “Refusal to Permit Treatment” and/or a “Leaving Hospital Against Medical Advice”; and (b) Any necessary waiver or release from liability required by a hospital or physician.

7 DESIGNATION OF ALTERNATE AGENTS. (You are not required to designate any alternate agents but you may do so. Any alternate agent you designate will be able to make the same health care decisions as the agent you designated in paragraph 1 above, in the event that agent is unable or ineligible to act as your agent. If an alternate agent you designate is your spouse, he or she becomes ineligible to act as your agent if your marriage is thereafter dissolved.) If the person designated as my agent in paragraph 1 is not available or becomes ineligible to act as my agent to make a health care decision for me or loses the mental capacity to make health care decisions for me, or if I revoke that person’s appointment or authority to act as my agent to make health care decisions for me, then I designate and appoint the following persons to serve as my agent to make health care decisions for me as authorized in this Directive, such persons to serve in the order listed below:

AFirst Alternate Agent:

Name ...............................

Address ...............................

Telephone Number ...............................

B Second Alternate Agent:

Name ...............................

Address ...............................

Telephone Number ...............................

C Third Alternate Agent:

Name ...............................

Address ...............................

Telephone Number ...............................

8PRIOR DESIGNATIONS REVOKED. I revoke any prior durable power of attorney for health care.

DATE AND SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL. (You must date and sign this Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care.) I sign my name to this Statutory Form Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care on the date set forth at the beginning of this Form at ............... (City, State)....................

..............................

Signature

A health care directive meeting the requirements of subsection (1) of this section may be registered with the department of health and welfare pursuant to the provisions of section 39-4515, Idaho Code. Failure to register the health care directive shall not affect the validity of the health care directive.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4510, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2006, ch. 67, § 3, p. 199; am. 2007, ch. 196, § 11, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 8, p. 825; am. 2020, ch. 297, § 1, p. 854.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 67, added the subsection (1) designation and added subsection (2).

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, in the introductory paragraph in subsection (1), deleted the former third through fifth sentences, which read: “A ‘Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ executed prior to the effective date of this act, but which was in the ‘Living Will’ and/or ‘Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ form pursuant to prior Idaho law at the time of execution, or in another form that contained the elements set forth in this chapter at the time of execution, shall be deemed to be in compliance with this chapter. A ‘Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ or similar document(s) executed in another state which substantially complies with this chapter shall be deemed to be in compliance with this chapter. In this chapter, a ‘Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ may be referred to as a ‘directive’”; in the Living Will form, in subsection (1), deleted “Being of sound mind” from the beginning, in subsection (1)(a), inserted “or irreversible,” in the first boxed paragraph, in subsection (1)(b), deleted “and to abolish or alleviate pain or distress” following “sustain my life,” deleted former subsection (2), which read: “This Directive shall be the final expression of my legal right to refuse or accept medical and surgical treatment, and I accept the consequences of such refusal or acceptance” and redesignated subsections accordingly, and added subsection (4); in the Durable Power of Attorney form, in subsection (3), deleted “Subject to any limitations in this Directive, including as set forth in paragraph 2 immediately above” from the beginning, and in subsections (3) and (4), substituted “artificial life sustaining care” for “life-prolonging care,” and inserted “Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form.”

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, inserted “advanced practice professional nurse or physician assistant” in both paragraphs of 4, under “A LIVING WILL” and inserted “the MIB Group, Inc.” in the third sentence of 5.B. under “A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE”.

Compiler’s Notes.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 297, substituted “department of health and welfare” for “secretary of state” near the middle of the first sentence in subsection (2). Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the MIB Group, Inc., referred to in paragraph 5.B of the DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE, see https://www.mib.com .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2006, ch. 67 provided “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 6 of this act [§ 39-4515] shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval [March 15, 2006] and Sections 1 through 5 of this act [§§ 9-340C, 39-4510, 39-4511A, 39-4513, and former 39-4509] shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2006. The Secretary of State will accept registration applications pursuant to this act on or after January 1, 2007.”

§ 39-4511. [Amended and Redesignated.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-4511 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-4511A by S.L. 2012, ch. 302, § 9, effective July 1, 2012.

§ 39-4511A. Revocation of advance directive.

  1. A living will and durable power of attorney for health care or physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form or other advance directive may be revoked at any time by the maker thereof by any of the following methods:
    1. By being intentionally canceled, defaced, obliterated or burned, torn, or otherwise destroyed by the maker thereof, or by some person in his presence and by his direction;
    2. By a written, signed revocation of the maker thereof expressing his intent to revoke;
    3. By an oral expression by the maker thereof expressing his intent to revoke; or
    4. By any other action that clearly manifests the maker’s intent to revoke the advance directive.
  2. The maker of the revoked advance directive is responsible for notifying his health care provider of the revocation. A health care provider who does not have actual knowledge of the revocation is entitled to rely on an otherwise apparently valid advance directive as though it had not been revoked.
  3. There shall be no criminal or civil liability on the part of any person for the failure to act upon a revocation of a living will and durable power of attorney for health care, physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form or other advance directive made pursuant to this chapter unless that person has actual knowledge of the revocation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4511, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2006, ch. 67, § 4, p. 199; am. 2007, ch. 196, § 12, p. 579; am. and redesig. 2012, ch. 302, § 9, p. 825; am. 2017, ch. 273, § 2, p. 713.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 67, added subsection (3).

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, in the introductory paragraph in subsection (1), inserted “or physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form,” and deleted “without regard to his mental state or competence” following “by the maker thereof”; added subsection (2); redesignated former subsection (2) as (3), and therein inserted “or physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form”; and deleted former subsection (3), which read: “A person may register a revocation of a health care directive which meets the requirements of subsection (1)(b) of this section with the secretary of state pursuant to the provisions of section 39-4515, Idaho Code. Failure to register a revocation of the health care directive shall not affect the validity of the revocation.”

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, redesignated the section from§ 39-4511; in subsection (1), inserted “or other similar advance directive” in the introductory paragraph and “intentionally” in paragraph (a); substituted “health care provider” for “physician” in subsection (2); and, in subsection (3), inserted “or other advance directive” and substituted “this chapter” for “this section.” The 2017 amendment, by ch. 273, inserted “of advance directive” at the end of the section heading; in subsection (1), deleted “similar” preceding “advance directive” near the middle of the introductory paragraph and added paragraph (d); and rewrote subsection (2), which formerly read: “The maker of the revoked living will and durable power of attorney for health care is responsible for notifying his health care provider of the revocation”.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-4511.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2006, ch. 67 provided “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 6 of this act [§ 39-4515] shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval [March 15, 2006] and Sections 1 through 5 of this act [§§ 9-340C, 39-4510, 39-4511A, 39-4513, and former 39-4509] shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2006. The Secretary of State will accept registration applications pursuant to this act on or after January 1, 2007.”

§ 39-4511B. Suspension of advance directive.

  1. A living will and durable power of attorney for health care, physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form or other advance directive may be suspended at any time by the maker thereof by any of the following methods:
    1. By a written, signed suspension by the maker thereof expressing his intent to suspend;
    2. By an oral expression by the maker thereof expressing his intent to suspend; or
    3. By any other action that clearly manifests the maker’s intent to suspend the advance directive.
  2. A health care provider who does not have actual knowledge of the suspension is entitled to rely on an otherwise apparently valid advance directive as though it had not been suspended.
  3. Upon meeting the termination terms of the suspension, as defined by the written or oral expression by the maker, the conditions set forth in the living will and durable power of attorney, physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) or other advance directive will resume.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4511B, as added by 2012, ch. 302, § 10, p. 825; am. 2017, ch. 273, § 3, p. 713.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 273, inserted “of advance directive” at the end of the section heading; in subsection (1), deleted “similar” preceding “advance directive” in the introductory paragraph and added paragraph (c); added present subsection (2), redesignating former subsection (2) as subsection (3).

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviations enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4512. Execution of living will and durable power of attorney for health care.

A “Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care” shall be effective from the date of execution unless otherwise revoked. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a competent person from reexecuting a “Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care” at any time.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4512, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380.

§ 39-4512A. Physician orders for scope of treatment (POST).

  1. A physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form is a health care provider order signed by a physician or by a PA or by an APPN. The POST form must also be signed by the person, or it must be signed by the person’s surrogate decision maker provided that the POST form is not contrary to the person’s last known expressed wishes or directions.
  2. The POST form shall be effective from the date of execution unless suspended or revoked.
  3. The attending physician, APPN or PA shall, upon request of the person or the person’s surrogate decision maker, provide the person or the person’s surrogate decision maker with a copy of the POST form, discuss with the person or the person’s surrogate decision maker the form’s content and ramifications and treatment options, and assist the person or the person’s surrogate decision maker in the completion of the form.
  4. The attending physician, APPN or PA shall review the POST form:
    1. Each time the physician, APPN or PA examines the person, or at least every seven (7) days, for persons who are hospitalized; and
    2. Each time the person is transferred from one (1) care setting or care level to another; and
    3. Any time there is a substantial change in the person’s health status; and
    4. Any time the person’s treatment preferences change.
  5. A person who has completed a POST form pursuant to the provisions of this section or for whom a POST form has been completed at the request of his or her surrogate decision maker may wear a POST identification device as provided in section 39-4502(15), Idaho Code.
  6. The department of health and welfare shall develop the POST form.

Failure to meet these review requirements does not affect the POST form’s validity or enforceability. As conditions warrant, the physician, APPN or PA may issue a superseding POST form. The physician, APPN or PA shall, whenever practical, consult with the person or the person’s surrogate decision maker.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4512A, as added by 2007, ch. 196, § 13, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 11, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviations enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4512B. Adherence to physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) protocol.

  1. Health care providers and emergency medical services personnel shall comply with a person’s physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) instruction when presented with a POST form that meets the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code, or when a person is wearing a proper POST identification device pursuant to section 39-4512A(5), Idaho Code.
  2. A POST form that meets the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code, is deemed to meet the requirements of “Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)” orders at all Idaho health care facilities. Health care providers and emergency medical services personnel shall not require the completion of other forms in order for the person’s wishes to be respected.
  3. Nothing in this chapter is intended to nor shall it prevent physicians or other health care providers from executing or utilizing DNR orders consistent with their licensure; provided however, that if the person or person’s surrogate decision maker chooses to utilize the POST form, the health care provider shall accept and comply with the POST form and shall not require the completion of a DNR order in addition to a valid POST form.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4512B, as added by 2007, ch. 196, § 14, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 12, p. 825.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, inserted “that meets the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code” in both subsections (1) and (2), deleted “signed by a physician” following “POST form” in subsection (1), and added subsection (3).

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviations enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4512C. Duty to inspect.

Health care providers and emergency medical services personnel shall make reasonable efforts to inquire as to whether the patient has completed a physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form and inspect the patient for a POST identification device when presented with a situation calling for artificial life-sustaining treatment not caused by severe trauma or involving mass casualties and with no indication of homicide or suicide.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4512C, as added by 2007, ch. 196, § 15, p. 579.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4513. Immunity.

  1. No emergency medical services personnel, health care provider, facility, or individual employed by, acting as the agent of, or under contract with any such health care provider or facility shall be civilly or criminally liable or subject to discipline for unprofessional conduct for acts or omissions carried out or performed in good faith pursuant to the directives in a facially valid POST form, living will, DNR order or other health care directive, or pursuant to a POST identification device as provided for in section 39-4512A(5), Idaho Code.
  2. Any physician or other health care provider who for ethical or professional reasons is incapable or unwilling to conform to the desires of the person who may give consent to care for the patient under section 39-4504, Idaho Code, as expressed by the procedures set forth in this chapter may, subject to the requirements of section 39-4514(3), Idaho Code, withdraw without incurring any civil or criminal liability provided the physician or other health care provider, before withdrawal of his or her participation, makes a good faith effort to assist the person in obtaining the services of another physician or other health care provider who is willing to provide care for the person in accordance with the person’s expressed or documented wishes.
  3. No person who exercises the responsibilities of a durable power of attorney for health care in good faith shall be subject to civil or criminal liability as a result.
  4. Neither the registration of a health care directive in the health care directive registry under section 39-4515, Idaho Code, nor the revocation of such a directive requires a health care provider to request information from that registry. The decision of a health care provider to request or not to request a health care directive document from the registry shall be immune from civil or criminal liability. A health care provider who in good faith acts in reliance on a facially valid health care directive received from the health care directive registry shall be immune from civil or criminal liability for those acts done in such reliance.
  5. Health care providers and emergency medical services personnel may disregard the POST form or a POST identification device or a DNR order:
    1. If they believe in good faith that the order has been revoked; or
    2. To avoid oral or physical confrontation; or
    3. If ordered to do so by the attending physician.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4513, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2006, ch. 67, § 5, p. 199; am. 2007, ch. 196, § 16, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 13, p. 825; am. 2012, ch. 305, § 2, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 67, added subsection (4).

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, rewrote subsection (1), which formerly read: “No medical personnel or health care facility shall be civilly or criminally liable for acts or omissions carried out or performed pursuant to the directives in a facially valid living will or by the holder of a facially valid durable power of attorney or directive for health care if the medical personnel or health care facility acts in good faith”; in subsection (2), inserted “before withdrawal of his or her participation,” deleted “before withdrawal” following the last occurrence of “health care provider,” and added the language beginning “who is willing to provide care”; and added subsection (5). This section was amended by two 2012 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, substituted the current ending of subsection (1) beginning “DNR order” for “by the holder of a facially valid durable power of attorney or directive for health care”; added “or a DNR order” in the introductory paragraph in subsection (5); and substituted “person” for “patient” throughout the section.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 305, in subsection (2), substituted “person who may give consent to care for the patient under section 39-4504, Idaho Code” for “patient” and inserted “subject to the requirements of section 39-4514(3), Idaho Code”.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2006, ch. 67 provided “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 6 of this act [§ 39-4515] shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval [March 15, 2006] and Sections 1 through 5 of this act [§§ 9-340C, 39-4510, 39-4511A, 39-4513, and former 39-4509] shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2006. The Secretary of State will accept registration applications pursuant to this act on or after January 1, 2007”.

§ 39-4514. General provisions.

  1. Application. Except as specifically provided herein, sections 39-4510 through 39-4512B, Idaho Code, shall have no effect or be in any manner construed to apply to persons not executing a living will and durable power of attorney for health care, POST form or other health care directive pursuant to this chapter nor shall these sections in any manner affect the rights of any such persons or of others acting for or on behalf of such persons to give or refuse to give consent or withhold consent for any medical care; neither shall sections 39-4510 through 39-4512B, Idaho Code, be construed to affect chapter 3 or chapter 4, title 66, Idaho Code, in any manner.
  2. Euthanasia, mercy killing, or assisted suicide. This chapter does not make legal, and in no way condones, euthanasia, mercy killing, or assisted suicide or permit an affirmative or deliberate act or omission to end life, including any act or omission described in section 18-4017, Idaho Code, other than to allow the natural process of dying.
  3. Withdrawal of care. Assisted feeding or artificial nutrition and hydration may not be withdrawn or denied if its provision is directed by a competent patient in accordance with section 39-4503, Idaho Code, by a patient’s health care directive under section 39-4510, Idaho Code, or by a patient’s surrogate decision-maker in accordance with section 39-4504, Idaho Code. Health care necessary to sustain life or to provide appropriate comfort for a patient other than assisted feeding or artificial nutrition and hydration may not be withdrawn or denied if its provision is directed by a competent patient in accordance with section 39-4503, Idaho Code, by a patient’s health care directive under section 39-4510, Idaho Code, or by a patient’s surrogate decision-maker in accordance with section 39-4504, Idaho Code, unless such care would be futile care as defined in subsection (6) of this section. Except as specifically provided in chapters 3 and 4, title 66, Idaho Code, health care, assisted feeding or artificial nutrition and hydration, the denial of which is directed by a competent patient in accordance with section 39-4503, Idaho Code, by a patient’s health care directive under section 39-4510, Idaho Code, or by a patient’s surrogate decision-maker in accordance with section 39-4504, Idaho Code, shall be withdrawn and denied in accordance with a valid directive. This subsection does not require provision of treatment to a patient if it would require denial of the same or similar treatment to another patient.
  4. Comfort care. Persons caring for a person for whom artificial life-sustaining procedures or artificially administered nutrition and hydration are withheld or withdrawn shall provide comfort care as defined in section 39-4502, Idaho Code.
  5. Presumed consent to resuscitation. There is a presumption in favor of consent to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) unless:
    1. CPR is contrary to the person’s advance directive and/or POST;
    2. The person’s surrogate decision-maker has communicated the person’s unconditional wishes not to receive CPR;
    3. The person’s surrogate decision-maker has communicated the person’s conditional wishes not to receive CPR and those conditions have been met;
    4. The person has a proper POST identification device pursuant to section 39-4502(15), Idaho Code; or (e) The attending health care provider has executed a DNR order consistent with the person’s prior expressed wishes or the directives of the legally authorized surrogate decision-maker.
  6. Futile care. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require medical treatment that is medically inappropriate or futile; provided that this subsection does not authorize any violation of subsection (3) of this section. Futile care does not include comfort care. Futile care is a course of treatment:
    1. For a patient with a terminal condition for whom, in reasonable medical judgment, death is imminent within hours or at most a few days whether or not the medical treatment is provided and that, in reasonable medical judgment, will not improve the patient’s condition; or
    2. The denial of which in reasonable medical judgment will not result in or hasten the patient’s death.
  7. Existing directives and directives from other states. A health care directive executed prior to July 1, 2012, but which was in the living will, durable power of attorney for health care, DNR, or POST form pursuant to prior Idaho law at the time of execution, or in another form that contained the elements set forth in this chapter at the time of execution, shall be deemed to be in compliance with this chapter. Health care directives or similar documents executed in another state that substantially comply with this chapter shall be deemed to be in compliance with this chapter. This section shall be liberally construed to give the effect to any authentic expression of the person’s prior wishes or directives concerning his or her health care.
  8. Insurance.
    1. The making of a living will and/or durable power of attorney for health care, physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form, or DNR order pursuant to this chapter shall not restrict, inhibit or impair in any manner the sale, procurement or issuance of any policy of life insurance, nor shall it be deemed to modify the terms of an existing policy of life insurance. No policy of life insurance shall be legally impaired or invalidated in any manner by the withholding or withdrawal of artificial life-sustaining procedures from an insured person, notwithstanding any term of the policy to the contrary.
    2. No physician, health care facility or other health care provider and no health care service plan, insurer issuing disability insurance, self-insured employee plan, welfare benefit plan or nonprofit hospital service plan shall require any person to execute a living will and durable power of attorney for health care or physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form, or DNR order as a condition for being insured for, or receiving, health care services.
  9. Portability and copies.
    1. A physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form that meets the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code, shall be transferred with the person to, and be effective in, all care settings including, but not limited to, home care, ambulance or other transport, hospital, residential care facility, and hospice care. The POST form shall remain in effect until such time as there is a valid revocation pursuant to section 39-4511A, Idaho Code, or new orders are issued by a physician, APPN or PA.
    2. A photostatic, facsimile or electronic copy of a valid physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form may be treated as an original by a health care provider or by an institution receiving or treating a person.
  10. Registration. A directive or the revocation of a directive meeting the requirements of this chapter may be registered with the department of health and welfare pursuant to section 39-4515, Idaho Code. Failure to register the health care directive shall not affect the validity of the health care directive. (11) Rulemaking authority.
    1. The department of health and welfare shall adopt those rules and protocols necessary to administer the provisions of this chapter.
    2. In the adoption of a physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) or DNR protocol, the department shall adopt standardized POST identification devices to be used statewide.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4514, as added by 2005, ch. 120, § 2, p. 380; am. 2007, ch. 196, § 17, p. 579; am. 2012, ch. 302, § 14, p. 825; am. 2012, ch. 305, § 3, p. 844; am. 2013, ch. 151, § 1, p. 349; am. 2013, ch. 187, § 5, p. 447; am. 2017, ch. 273, § 4, p. 713; am. 2020, ch. 297, § 2, p. 854.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 196, in subsection (1), added “Application,” and inserted “or POST form” and “or chapter 4”; rewrote subsection (2), which formerly read: “The making of a ‘Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ pursuant to this chapter shall not restrict, inhibit or impair in any manner the sale, procurement or issuance of any policy of life insurance, nor shall it be deemed to modify the terms of an existing policy of life insurance. No policy of life insurance shall be legally impaired or invalidated in any manner by the withholding or withdrawal of artificial life-sustaining procedures from an insured patient, notwithstanding any term of the policy to the contrary”; rewrote subsection (3), which formerly read: “No physician, health facility or other health care provider and no health care service plan, insurer issuing disability insurance, self-insured employee plan, welfare benefit plan or nonprofit hospital service plan shall require any person to execute a ‘Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care’ as a condition for being insured for, or receiving, health care services”; and added subsections (4) through (10).

This section was amended by two 2012 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 302, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 305, added the exception at the beginning of subsection (1); added subsection (3), renumbering the subsequent subsections; and, in subsection (6), added “provided that this subsection does not authorize any violation of subsection (3) of this section. Futile care does not include comfort care. Futile care is a course of treatment” in the introductory paragraph and added paragraphs (a) and (b).

This section was amended by two 2013 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 151, inserted “necessary to sustain life or to provide appropriate comfort for a patient” in the second sentence in subsection (3). The 2013 amendment, by ch. 187, substituted “sections” for “Sections” near the beginning of subsection (1).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 273, rewrote subsection (5), which formerly read: “(5) Presumed consent to resuscitation. There is a presumption in favor of consent to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) unless: (a) A completed durable power of attorney for health care or living will for that person is in effect, pursuant to section 39-4510, Idaho Code, in which the person has stated that he or she does not wish to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and any terms set forth in the durable power of attorney for health care or living will upon which such statement is conditioned have been met; or (b) The person’s surrogate decision maker has communicated the person’s wishes not to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation and any terms on which the wishes not to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation are conditioned have been met; or (c) The person has a physician orders for scope of treatment (POST) form that meets the requirements of section 39-4512A, Idaho Code, stating that the person does not wish to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation and any terms on which the statement is conditioned have been met and/or has a proper POST identification device pursuant to section 39-4502(15), Idaho Code”.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 297, substituted “department of health and welfare” for “secretary of state” near the end of the first sentence in subsection (10).

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviations enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4515. Health care directive registry.

  1. The department of health and welfare shall create and maintain a health care directive registry. The health care directive registry shall be accessible through a web-based platform. The information contained in such registry shall include: the full name of the person executing the health care directive as stated in the directive, a file identification number unique to the person executing the directive, and the date the directive was executed. The registry shall be made available twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week and shall incorporate directives previously submitted to the secretary of state.
  2. The registry established under this section shall be accessible only by entering the identification file number and the assigned password on the health care directive registry.
  3. The department of health and welfare and those granted access to the health care directive registry shall use information contained in the registry only for purposes prescribed in this section. No person granted access to the registry shall use the information for commercial solicitations or in any fraudulent or improper way. Any commercial solicitation or fraudulent or improper use of information contained in the registry shall constitute a violation of this section and a violation of the Idaho consumer protection act.
  4. The department of health and welfare is not required to review a health care directive or revocation thereof to ensure that the document complies with any applicable and statutory requirements. Entry of a document into the health care directive registry pursuant to this section does not create a presumption favoring the validity of the document.
  5. The department of health and welfare shall delete a health care directive and the informational registration form from the health care directive registry when the department of health and welfare receives:
    1. Written notification to remove a health care directive signed by the maker thereof or that person’s legal representative along with the identification file number and assigned password; or
    2. Verification from the bureau of vital records and health statistics of the department of health and welfare that the person who executed the health care directive is deceased. The deletion under this paragraph shall be performed not less than once every two (2) years.
  6. Neither the department of health and welfare nor the state of Idaho shall be subject to civil liability for any claims or demands arising out of the administration or operation of the health care directive registry. (7) There is hereby created in the state treasury the health care directive registry fund, the moneys of which shall be continuously appropriated, administered by the department of health and welfare, and used to support, promote and maintain the health care directive registry. The fund shall consist of fees paid by persons registering health care directives under this section and income from investment from the fund, gifts, grants, bequests and other forms of voluntary donations. On notice from the department of health and welfare, the state treasurer shall invest and divest moneys in the fund, and moneys earned from such investment shall be credited to the fund.

A person may register with the department of health and welfare a health care directive or a revocation of a health care directive by submitting the directive or revocation, completing and submitting an informational registration form as required by the department of health and welfare, and paying the department the fee that the department may require for registering a health care directive. The person may register either online or by submitting the registration form in the mail. The person who submits a document for registration pursuant to this section by mail shall provide a return address.

The department of health and welfare may charge and collect a fee not to exceed ten dollars ($10.00) for the filing of a health care directive. All fees collected for the filing of a health care directive shall be deposited into the health care directive registry fund. No fee shall be charged for revoking a health care directive.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4515, as added by 2006, ch. 67, § 6, p. 199; am. 2020, ch. 297, § 3, p. 854.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 297, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Effective Dates.

Section 7 of S.L. 2006, ch. 67 provided “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 6 of this act [§ 39-4515] shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval [March 15, 2006] and Sections 1 through 5 of this act [§§ 9-340C, 39-4510, 39-4511A, 39-4513, and former 39-4509] shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2006. The Secretary of State will accept registration applications pursuant to this act on or after January 1, 2007.”

§ 39-4516. Life-sustaining treatment for unemancipated minors.

  1. This section shall be known and may be cited as “Simon’s Law.”
  2. As used in this section:
    1. “Order not to resuscitate” means a physician’s order that resuscitative measures shall not be provided to a person under a physician’s care in the event the person is found to have cardiopulmonary cessation. “Order not to resuscitate” shall include but is not limited to physician orders written as “do not resuscitate,” “do not allow resuscitation,” “do not allow resuscitative measures,” “DNAR,” “DNR,” “allow natural death,” or “AND”;
    2. “Reasonable medical judgment” means a medical judgment that would be made by a reasonably prudent health care provider who is knowledgeable about a patient’s case and the treatment possibilities with respect to the medical conditions involved; and
    3. “Unemancipated minor” means a minor who is not married or is not in active military service.
  3. An order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, and a similar physician’s order shall not be instituted, either orally or in writing, unless at least one (1) parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated minor who is a patient or resident of a hospital or health care facility under whose care the unemancipated minor has been admitted has first been notified of the physician’s intent to institute such an order, and reasonable attempts have been made to notify any other parent or legal guardian, provided such parent or guardian is reasonably available and has custodial or visitation rights. Such notification must be provided both orally and in writing to at least one (1) parent or legal guardian of the unemancipated minor patient unless, in the physician’s reasonable medical judgment, the urgency of the decision requires reliance on only providing the information orally. Such notification must also include informing the parent or legal guardian of the forty-eight (48) hour provision in subsection (5) of this section. Unless the parent or legal guardian agrees with the implementation of the following orders, an order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, or a similar physician’s order shall not be instituted, either orally or in writing, until at least forty-eight (48) hours after oral and written notice have been provided to at least one (1) parent or legal guardian in accordance with this section. The provision of such notification must be contemporaneously recorded in the patient’s medical record, specifying by whom and to whom the notification was given, the date and time of its provision, and whether it was provided in writing as well. When only one (1) parent or guardian has been notified, the nature of reasonable attempts to inform another parent or guardian, or the reason why such attempts were not made, must also be contemporaneously recorded in the unemancipated minor patient’s medical record.
  4. The requirements of subsection (3) of this section shall not apply after seventy-two (72) hours of diligent efforts have been made by the health care provider, without success, to contact and notify at least one (1) known parent or legal guardian of the unemancipated minor patient of the intent to implement an order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, or a similar physician’s order.
  5. Within forty-eight (48) hours of being notified of the intent to institute an order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, or a similar physician’s order according to subsection (3) of this section, a parent or legal guardian shall be entitled to request a transfer of the unemancipated minor patient or resident to another facility or discharge. If a transfer is requested by a parent or legal guardian, the hospital or health care facility under whose care the unemancipated minor is admitted must continue provision of artificial life-sustaining procedures and life-sustaining artificial nutrition and hydration for a minimum of fifteen (15) days after the transfer request has been made known and make every reasonable effort to assist the requesting parent or legal guardian in the transfer process. The hospital or health care facility’s duties and financial obligations regarding transfer shall be governed by existing state law, applicable rules or regulations, hospital policy, and relevant third-party payment contracts. (6) If a transfer cannot be arranged and executed within fifteen (15) days from the parent’s or guardian’s request to transfer, an order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, or a similar physician’s order may be instituted.
  6. If a transfer cannot be arranged and executed within fifteen (15) days from the parent’s or guardian’s request to transfer, an order not to resuscitate, an order to withhold artificial life-sustaining procedures, an order to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration, or a similar physician’s order may be instituted.
  7. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the rights pursuant to section 39-4503, 39-4504, 39-4509, or 39-4510, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4516, as added by 2020, ch. 337, § 1, p. 980.

Chapter 46 IDAHO DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES AND FACILITIES ACT

Sec.

§ 39-4601. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Act of 1978.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4601, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 240 and 270 of S.L. 1978 each purported to enact a new chapter 46 in title 39. Accordingly, chapter 270 was codified as chapter 46 of title 39, while chapter 270 was codified as chapter 48 of title 39 through the use of brackets. Chapter 47 of title 39 was added by S.L. 1978, chapter 155. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1978, chapter 240 was made permanent by S.L. 1979, chapter 313.

CASE NOTES

Cited

George ex rel. George v. Donovan, 114 Idaho 388, 757 P.2d 651 (1987).

§ 39-4602. Purpose.

It is declared to be the policy of the legislature of the state of Idaho to authorize and mandate the department of health and welfare to develop and coordinate services for developmentally disabled persons through adult and child development programs and through contracts with rehabilitation facilities. The complexities of developmental disabilities require the services of many state departments as well as those of the community. It is the intent of this chapter that the department of health and welfare will cooperate with recognized agencies, organizations and departments in implementing this chapter. Services should be planned and provided as a part of a continuum. A pattern of facilities, services and eligibility should be established which is sufficiently complete to meet the needs of each developmentally disabled person regardless of age or degree of disability, with consideration of the family.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4602, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 26, p. 542.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, substituted “disability” for “handicap” in the last sentence.

§ 39-4603. Declaration of rights.

Persons with developmental disabilities shall have the same legal rights and responsibilities guaranteed all other persons by the constitution and laws of the United States of America and by the constitution and laws of the state of Idaho.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4603, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624.

§ 39-4604. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Comprehensive developmental disability system” means a system of services including, but not limited to, the following basic services with the intention of providing alternatives to institutionalization:
    1. Evaluation services;
    2. Diagnostic services;
    3. Treatment services;
    4. Individualized developmental programs;
    5. Extended sheltered employment and work activities;
    6. Recreation services;
    7. Domiciliary care services;
    8. Special living arrangement services;
    9. Counseling services;
    10. Information and referral services;
    11. Follow-along services; and
    12. Transportation services.
  2. “Department” means the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  3. “Developmental disabilities facility” means any service or group of services which provide care to the developmentally disabled on an inpatient, outpatient, residential, clinical or other programmatic basis, including sheltered workshops and adult and child development centers.
  4. “Developmental disability” is:
    1. Attributable to an impairment, such as intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism or other condition found to be closely related to or similar to one of these impairments that requires similar treatment or services or is attributable to dyslexia resulting from such impairments;
    2. Has continued or can be expected to continue indefinitely; and
    3. Constitutes a substantial limitation to such person’s ability to function normally in society.
  5. “Habilitation” is the process of developing skills and abilities.
  6. “Normalization” is the process of providing services which promote a life as much as possible like that of the rest of the community, including living in the community and access to community resources.
  7. “Rehabilitation” is the process of improving skills or level of adjustment to increase the person’s ability to maintain satisfactory independent or dependent functioning.
  8. “Substantial limitation” is:
    1. A disability which results in substantial function limitation in three (3) or more of the following areas of major life activity:
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4604, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 27, p. 542.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, alphabetized the definitions, making subsection redesignations; in paragraph (4)(a), substituted “intellectual disability” for “mental retardation”; and in paragraph (4)(c) and in the introductory language in subsection (8), substituted “limitation” for “handicap.”

CASE NOTES

Cited

George ex rel. George v. Donovan, 114 Idaho 388, 757 P.2d 651 (1987).

§ 39-4605. Duties of the department.

The department shall provide appropriate services of habilitation and rehabilitation to the eligible population of developmentally disabled, and shall consult with the state council on developmental disabilities. The department shall be the primary agency responsible for the services set forth herein, and shall:

  1. Develop and prepare an annual plan for the initiation and maintenance of developmental disabilities services authorized in this chapter. Such services shall include, but not be limited to community comprehensive developmental disability services;
  2. Initiate and provide services which shall include, but not be limited to, community comprehensive developmental disabilities services;
  3. In order to provide services, enter into agreements with any person or persons, corporation or association, approved by the department, for the contracting of all or a portion of the costs of the care, treatment, maintenance, support and training of developmentally disabled persons; and
  4. Provide technical assistance for state and local personnel working in the field of developmental disabilities under this chapter.

Any person, corporation or association may make application to the department for approval and certification of the applicant’s developmental disabilities facility. The department may either grant or deny certification or revoke certification previously granted after investigation of the applicant’s facilities, to ascertain whether or not such facilities are adequate for the health, safety and the care, treatment, maintenance, training and support of developmentally disabled persons, in accordance with standards as set forth in rules and regulations promulgated by the board of health and welfare and consistent with existing national accreditation bodies.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4605, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624; am. 1980, ch. 325, § 8, p. 820.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of health and welfare,§ 56-1005.

State council on developmental disabilities,§ 67-6701 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 11 of S.L. 1980, ch. 325 declared an emergency. Approved April 2, 1980.

CASE NOTES

Funds.

Mandamus did not lie to compel the department of health and welfare to provide habilitative services for disabled children, where the agency had not refused to perform a duty directed by the legislature, but had actually performed the duty and simply run out of funds. George ex rel. George v. Donovan, 114 Idaho 388, 757 P.2d 651 (1987).

Although the department of health and welfare was required to provide services to developmentally handicapped children, it was constitutionally prohibited from transferring funds into the developmental disabilities program from nonmandatory programs, absent appropriation by the legislature. George ex rel. George v. Donovan, 114 Idaho 388, 757 P.2d 651 (1987).

§ 39-4606. Eligibility for services.

Any person suspected of a developmental disability shall be eligible for initial intake and for diagnostic services through any comprehensive developmental disability center, without reference to any other eligibility criteria.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4606, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624.

§ 39-4607. Effect on existing facilities.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the continuation of existing developmental disabilities facilities or services in the state.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4607, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624.

§ 39-4608. Discrimination prohibited.

The services provided under this chapter shall be made available without discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed or ability to pay.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4608, as added by 1978, ch. 270, § 1, p. 624.

Chapter 47 YELLOW DOT MOTOR VEHICLE MEDICAL INFORMATION ACT

Sec.

§ 39-4701. Short title.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Yellow Dot Motor Vehicle Medical Information Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4701, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former chapter 47, Title 39, which comprised§§ 39-4701 to 39-4708,. Legislative intent — Definitions — Standards of provision of respite care — Who may provide respite care — Eligibility for use of care — Reimbursement to providers for services — Liability of actions, was repealed by S.L. 1997, ch. 33§ 9, effective July 1, 1997. For present comparable law, see§§ 39-5101 to 39-5106.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2020, Chapter 283, codified as§§ 39-4701 through 39-4710.

§ 39-4702. Legislative intent.

It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a yellow dot program to assist:

  1. Drivers and passengers who participate in the program;
  2. Emergency medical responders in reporting critical medical information in the event of a motor vehicle accident or a medical emergency involving a participant’s vehicle; and
  3. Peace officers, or other law enforcement personnel, in becoming aware of a motorist’s or passenger’s critical medical information that may affect the officer’s encounter with the motorist or passenger during a traffic stop or welfare check.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4702, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4702 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4703. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Accident” means any event that results in an unintended injury or property damage attributable directly or indirectly to the motion of a motor vehicle or its load, a snowmobile, or special mobile equipment.
  2. “Department” means the department of health and welfare.
  3. “Driver” means every person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle.
  4. “Emergency medical responder” means:
    1. Emergency medical services licensed personnel as defined in section 56-1012(19), Idaho Code; or
    2. A physician, nurse, or other health care provider on the scene of a motor vehicle accident or emergency situation as provided in section 39-4708, Idaho Code, or who is accompanying or attending a patient removed from such an accident or emergency situation in an ambulance.
  5. “Motor vehicle” or “vehicle” means every vehicle that is self-propelled and, for the purpose of titling and registration meets federal motor vehicle safety standards as defined in section 49-107, Idaho Code. Motor vehicle does not include vehicles moved solely by human power, electric personal assistive mobility devices, personal delivery devices, electric-assisted bicycles, and motorized wheelchairs or other such vehicles that are specifically exempt from titling or registration requirements under title 49, Idaho Code.
  6. “Other responder” means a firefighter, peace officer, or other law enforcement personnel on the scene.
  7. “Peace officer” means any employee of a police or law enforcement agency that is a part of or administered by the state or any political subdivision thereof and whose duties include and primarily consist of the prevention and detection of crime and the enforcement of penal, traffic, or highway laws of this state or any political subdivision of this state.
  8. “Yellow dot motor vehicle medical information program” or “yellow dot program” means the program established pursuant to this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4703, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 50-1001 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4703 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4704. Authorization and funding.

  1. The department is authorized to develop and assist in the implementation of the yellow dot program.
  2. The department may accept donations and grants from any source, including eligible federal safety funds, to pay the expenses the department in the development and implementation of the yellow dot program.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4704, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4704 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4705. Publicizing program.

The department shall take reasonable measures to publicize the yellow dot program to potential participants, law enforcement officers, and emergency medical responders. In publicizing the yellow dot program, the department may cooperate with local law enforcement agencies, fire departments, emergency medical services agencies, the department of veterans affairs, and other governmental agencies. The department may also cooperate with and seek the assistance of interested nonprofit organizations, including but not limited to AARP, American automobile association, disabled American veterans, American veterans (AMVETS), the American legion, veterans of foreign wars of the United States, the military order of the purple heart, and the Idaho commission on aging. The department may also develop training materials on the yellow dot program that may be furnished to law enforcement agencies, fire departments, and emergency medical services agencies and used by such organizations for training purposes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4705, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Commission on aging,§ 67-5001 et seq.

Division of veterans services,§ 65-201 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4705 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

Federal References.

The department of veterans affairs, referred to in this section, is organized under 38 U.S.C.S. § 301 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviation enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-4706. Standard medical information form.

  1. The department is authorized to create a standard medical information form providing space for each participant to supply, at a minimum, the following information:
    1. The participant’s name;
    2. A photograph of the participant;
    3. Two (2) emergency contacts identified by the participant and their contact information;
    4. The participant’s relevant medical information, including medical conditions, recent surgeries, allergies, and medications;
    5. The participant’s hospital preference;
    6. Up to two (2) preferred physicians identified by the participant and their contact information; and
    7. The date on which the participant completed the form.
  2. The medical information form shall include a statement that the yellow dot program functions only as a facilitator and that all information supplied on the medical information form is the sole responsibility of the participant.
  3. The medical information form shall also include statements that the participant supplies the medical information voluntarily and that the participant authorizes the disclosure to, and use of, such medical information by emergency medical responders and other responders for the purposes described in section 39-4708, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4706, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4706 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4707. Distribution of program materials.

  1. The department may provide for, assist in, or authorize the printing of the standard medical information form as provided in section 39-4706, Idaho Code, and assembling of a yellow dot folder containing the medical information form and a yellow dot decal with an adhesive backing.
  2. Upon request, the department may provide yellow dot folders to the agencies and nonprofit organizations identified in section 39-4705, Idaho Code, subject to the limitations of resources for funding the program. The department may allow such agencies and organizations to copy the standard medical information form and assemble yellow dot folders for distribution to participants, or the department may authorize these agencies and organizations to prepare yellow dot folders for distribution.
  3. The department may also provide for dissemination of the medical information form and other yellow dot materials online.
  4. The department shall not charge any fee to participate in the yellow dot program.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4707, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4707 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4708. Motor vehicle accidents or emergency situations.

  1. If a driver or passenger of a motor vehicle becomes involved in a motor vehicle accident or emergency situation and a yellow dot decal is affixed to the vehicle, an emergency medical responder or other responder at the scene is authorized to search the vehicle for a yellow dot folder or folders.
  2. An emergency medical responder or other responder may use the information contained in the yellow dot folder for the following purposes:
    1. To identify a participant in the yellow dot program;
    2. To ascertain whether the participant has a medical condition that may impede communication with the responder;
    3. To communicate with the participant’s emergency contacts about the location and general condition of the participant; and
    4. To consider the person’s current medications and preexisting medical conditions when emergency medical treatment is administered for any injury the participant suffers.
  3. If, during a traffic stop involving a motor vehicle with a yellow dot decal affixed to the vehicle, a law enforcement officer reasonably believes the driver or passenger has a medical condition that is affecting the officer’s encounter with the driver or a passenger, such law enforcement officer, upon receiving consent from the driver or passenger, is authorized to review any yellow dot folder or folders present in the vehicle.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4708, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4708 was repealed. See Prior Laws§ 39-4701.

§ 39-4709. Liability.

Except for wanton or willful conduct, no emergency medical responder or other responder, nor any employer of an emergency medical responder or other responder, shall incur any liability if the emergency medical responder or other responder is unable to make contact, in good faith, with an emergency contact person or disseminates or fails to disseminate any information from the yellow dot folder to other emergency medical responders, hospitals, or any health care providers who render emergency medical treatment to the participant. No health care provider or employer of a health care provider shall incur any civil or criminal liability if the provider relies in good faith on the information provided through the yellow dot program.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4709, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

§ 39-4710. Presence of a yellow dot on a motor vehicle shall not provide probable cause.

Nothing in this chapter shall provide a peace officer with probable cause or other legal authority to stop a motor vehicle. Except for the limited authority provided in section 39-4708, Idaho Code, nothing in this chapter shall provide a peace officer with probable cause or other legal authority to search a motor vehicle or its occupants.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4710, as added by 2020, ch. 283, § 1, p. 824.

Chapter 47A PERSONAL CARE SERVICES

Sec.

39-A4701 — 39-A4707. [Amended and Redesignated.]

§ 39-A4701 — 39-A4707. [Amended and Redesignated.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Former §§ 39-A4701 to 39-A4707 were amended and redesignated as§§ 39-5601 to 39-5607, respectively, by§§ 1-7 of S.L. 1990, ch. 326.

Chapter 48 IMMUNIZATION

Sec.

§ 39-4801. Immunization required.

Except as provided in section 39-4802, Idaho Code, any child in Idaho of school age may attend grades preschool and kindergarten through twelve (12) of any public, private or parochial school operating in this state if otherwise eligible, provided that upon admission, the parent or guardian shall provide an immunization record to the school authorities regarding the child’s immunity to certain childhood diseases. This record, signed by a physician or his representative or another licensed health care professional, shall verify that such child has received, or is in the process of receiving immunizations as specified by the state board of health and welfare, or can effectively demonstrate, through verification in a form approved by the department of health and welfare, immunity gained through prior contraction of the disease.

Immunizations required and the manner and frequency of their administration shall be as prescribed by the state board of health and welfare and shall conform to recognized standard medical practices in the state. The state board of health and welfare, in cooperation with the state board of education and the Idaho school boards association, shall promulgate appropriate rules for the enforcement of the required immunization program and specify reporting requirements of schools, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C., [§ 39-4801]§ 39-4601, as added by 1978, ch. 240, § 1, p. 516; am. and redesig. 1979, ch. 313, § 1, p. 845; am. 1991, ch. 251, § 1, p. 619; am. 1992, ch. 102, § 1, p. 321; am. 2011, ch. 212, § 1, p. 599.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of education,§ 33-101 et seq.

State board of health and welfare,§ 56-1005.

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 212, in the first paragraph, substituted “an immunization record” for “a statement” near the end of the first sentence and substituted “This record” for “This statement shall provide a certificate” and inserted “or another licensed health care professional, shall verify” in the second sentence; and, in the last paragraph, deleted “and regulations” following “rules” in the last sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 240 and 270 of S.L. 1978 each purported to enact a new chapter 46 in title 39. Accordingly, chapter 270 was codified as chapter 46 of title 39, while chapter 270 was codified as chapter 48 of title 39 through the use of brackets. Chapter 47 of title 39 was added by S.L. 1978, chapter 155. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1978, chapter 240 was made permanent by S.L. 1979, chapter 313. The Idaho school boards association was founded in 1942 to assist locally elected school board members with policy services, publications, and legislative advocacy. See http://www.idsba.org .

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

§ 39-4802. Exemptions.

  1. Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted to school officials a certificate signed by a physician licensed by the state board of medicine stating that the physical condition of the child is such that all or any of the required immunizations would endanger the life or health of the child shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.
  2. Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.
History.

I.C., [§ 39-4802]§ 39-4602, as added by 1978, ch. 240, § 1, p. 516; am. and redesig. 1979, ch. 313, § 2, p. 845.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 240 and 270 of S.L. 1978 each purported to enact a new chapter 46 in title 39. Accordingly, chapter 270 was codified as chapter 46 of title 39, while chapter 270 was codified as chapter 48 of title 39 through the use of brackets. Chapter 47 of title 39 was added by S.L. 1978, chapter 155. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1978, chapter 240 was made permanent by S.L. 1979, chapter 313.

Section 2 of S.L. 1978, ch. 240 read: “The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-4803. Immunization registry.

  1. The department of health and welfare shall provide for the establishment of a voluntary registry of the immunization status of Idaho children against childhood diseases. The registry shall be maintained and its data disclosed as set out herein to further the following purposes:
    1. To make immunizations readily available to every Idaho citizen that desires to have their child immunized;
    2. To increase the voluntary immunization rate in Idaho to the maximum extent possible without mandating such immunizations;
    3. To recognize and respect the rights of parents and guardians to make health care decisions for their children; and
    4. To provide for timely reminders to parents of children in the registry.
  2. The name of a child and information relating to the immunization status of that child shall be collected and included in the registry unless a parent, guardian or other person legally responsible for the care of the child chooses not to have the child included in the registry upon a specified written statement. Such statement may not be part of a general authorization or release. The registry shall contain the following information for each child:
    1. The child’s name, address and birth date;
    2. The name and address of each parent of the child;
    3. The month, day, year and type of each immunization that has been administered to the child;
    4. The name, address and phone number of each provider that has administered an immunization to the child;
    5. If requested by a parent or guardian, any statement made pursuant to subsection (4) of this section; and
    6. Other information as authorized or requested by a parent or guardian.
  3. The department of health and welfare shall only disclose information relating to an individual child in the registry to the following upon a specific request:
    1. Employees of the health district in which the child resides or seeks medical services;
    2. Health records staff of the school or school district in which the child is enrolled;
    3. The operator of a licensed daycare facility in which the child is enrolled;
    4. Persons who are legally responsible for the long-term care of the child, including operators of licensed ICF/ID’s and residential or assisted living facilities, adoptive and foster parents and a guardian appointed pursuant to chapter 5, title 15, Idaho Code;
    5. Any health care provider rendering treatment to the child, and the provider’s agents;
    6. Any person possessing a lawful release, properly executed by the child’s parent or guardian;
    7. A parent of the child;
    8. Any hospital where the child is receiving care; or
    9. The Idaho health data exchange.
  4. A parent or guardian of the child shall have free and open access to all information in the registry that relates to their child or themselves. Upon the written request of a parent or guardian, the department of health and welfare shall: (a) Cause all information relating to the child to be removed from the registry;
    1. Cause all information relating to the child to be removed from the registry;
    2. Include in the registry the statement of a physician or parent pursuant to section 39-4802(2) or 39-1118(2), Idaho Code.
  5. All information contained in the registry or disclosed from it is confidential and may not be sold and may only be disclosed as specifically authorized in this section. A person or entity to whom information is disclosed from the registry may not thereafter disclose it to others except in accordance with state and federal laws applicable to the use of protected health information. Any person who discloses or authorizes disclosure of any information contained in the registry, except as authorized in this section, is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable for civil damages in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100) for each violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4803, as added by 1999, ch. 347, § 1, p. 926; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 118, p. 799; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 28, p. 542; am. 2010, ch. 336, § 1, p. 889; am. 2015, ch. 253, § 1, p. 1057.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

ICF/ID,§ 39-1301.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2010 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, substituted “operators of licensed ICF/ID’s” for “operators of licensed ICF/MR’s” in paragraph (3)(d).

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 336, in the introductory paragraphs in subsections (1) through (3), substituted “shall” for “may”; in the introductory paragraph in subsection (2), rewrote the first sentence, which formerly read: “The name of a child or information relating to the immunization status of that child may be collected or included in the registry only upon the separate and specific written authorization of a parent, guardian or other person legally responsible for the care of the child,” and in the second sentence, substituted “statement” for “authorization”; and in paragraph (3)(c), substituted “daycare facility” for “child care facility.”

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 253, added paragraph (3)(i); deleted “and any databases or files of other entities or persons to which information in the database has been disclosed” at the end of paragraph (4)(a); and added “except in accordance with state and federal laws applicable to the use of protected health information” at the end of second sentence of subsection (5).

§ 39-4804. Notification to parent or guardian.

  1. Before an immunization is administered to any child in this state, the parent or guardian of the child shall be notified that:
    1. Immunizations are not mandatory and may be refused on religious or other grounds;
    2. Participation in the immunization registry is voluntary;
    3. The parent or guardian is entitled to an accurate explanation of the complications known to follow such immunization.
  2. At the time information is initially collected regarding any child for entry into the registry created pursuant to this chapter, the parent or guardian shall be notified that:
    1. They have the right under Idaho law to submit a statement pursuant to the provisions of sections 39-1118 and 39-4802, Idaho Code, which exempts them from any requirement to have information regarding the child entered into the registry;
    2. At any time they have the right to remove any information from the registry regarding the child; and
    3. Immunizations are not mandatory and may be refused on religious or other grounds.
  3. The decision of a parent or guardian to:
    1. Submit a statement pursuant to the provisions of either section 39-1118(2) or 39-4802(2), Idaho Code;
    2. Remove any information regarding the child from the registry pursuant to the provisions of section 39-4803(4), Idaho Code; or
    3. Refuse the immunization on religious or other grounds;

shall not be used in any manner against the interests of the parent or guardian in any administrative, civil or criminal action.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4804, as added by 1999, ch. 347, § 3, p. 926; am. 2010, ch. 336, § 2, p. 889.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 336, designated the introductory paragraph as subsection (1) and redesignated former subsections (1) through (3) as paragraphs (1)(a) through (1)(c); and added subsections (2) and (3).

§ 39-4805. Idaho childhood immunization policy commission.

  1. There is hereby created in the department of health and welfare the Idaho childhood immunization policy commission. The purpose of the commission is to evaluate policies regarding childhood immunization in Idaho and make recommendations to the board of health and welfare on policy and to the Idaho legislature on legislative action to increase immunization rates.
  2. The commission shall be composed of eight (8) regular members and two (2) ex officio members:
    1. One (1) representative of the department of health and welfare, division of public health, appointed by the director of the department;
    2. One (1) representative of Idaho public health districts, appointed by the Idaho association of public health district directors;
    3. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho primary care association;
    4. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho hospital association;
    5. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho academy of family physicians;
    6. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho chapter of the American academy of pediatrics;
    7. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho immunization coalition;
    8. One (1) member appointed by the Idaho medical association;
    9. One (1) member of the Idaho senate who will serve as an ex officio member of the commission, appointed by the president pro tempore of the senate; and
    10. One (1) member of the Idaho house of representatives who will serve as an ex officio member of the commission, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives.
  3. The commission shall meet on or before October 1, 2010, and shall meet not less than once per each calendar year thereafter. At its initial meeting, the commission shall elect a chair, a vice chair and a secretary from among its members. These officers shall serve for terms of one (1) year and may be elected for successive terms. Meetings of the commission shall be held in Boise. Members may participate in meetings through electronic means.
  4. The department of health and welfare shall provide to the commission a suitable meeting location and reasonable clerical support.
  5. The duties and responsibilities of the commission are to:
    1. Review existing provisions of the Idaho Code and rules of the department of health and welfare regarding childhood immunization; and
    2. Make recommendations to the Idaho legislature for legislation and to the board of health and welfare for rulemaking on:
      1. Improving Idaho’s childhood immunization rates; (ii) The immunization requirements for children attending daycare and school;
      2. The Idaho immunization reminder information system;
      3. Public and private partnerships to improve immunization rates; and
      4. Other states best practices on improving immunization rates.
    3. Make recommendations to public agencies, health care providers and others regarding policies and practices that are designed to improve Idaho’s childhood immunization rates.

Each member of the commission shall serve at the pleasure of the person responsible for the member’s appointment. Members of the commission shall not be paid for their service or be entitled for reimbursement for travel expenses, except that members of the Idaho legislature serving as ex officio members of the commission shall be reimbursed for their vouched travel expenses associated with their service on the commission in a manner consistent with policy for other state officers and employees.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4805, as added by 2010, ch. 134, § 1, p. 285.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Websites for organizations referenced in subsection (2):

Idaho primary care association — http://idahopca.org

Idaho hospital association — https://www.teamiha.org

Idaho academy of family physicians — http://idahofamilyphysicians.org

Idaho chapter of the American academy of pediatrics — http://www.idahoaap.org

Idaho immunization coalition — http://idahoimmune.org

Idaho medical association — https://www.idmed.org

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2010, ch. 134 provided: “The provisions of this act shall be null, void and of no force and effect on and after July 1, 2014.” Section 1 of S.L. 2014, Chapter 50 repealed section 2 of S.L. 2010, Chapter 134, effective July 1, 2014.

Chapter 49 IDAHO HEALTH PLANNING ACT

Sec.

§ 39-4901. Purpose and policy.

It is the intent of the legislature to provide to all of Idaho residents a quality health care system for a reasonable cost and to prevent the deterioration of such system by the duplication of services or the introduction of new categories of services that are not necessary to their health. It is further the intent of the legislature to promote cooperation among health care providers in health planning activities and to provide access to necessary care for all who require it. It is hereby declared that it is in the public interest of the state, to provide for the relief from penalties of state and federal law, cooperative planning in health care that is likely to benefit the residents of the state.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4901, as added by 1994, ch. 283, § 2, p. 883.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 39-4901 to 39-4914, as enacted by S.L. 1980, ch. 121, § 1 and amended by S.L. 1982, ch. 55, § 1, expired on their own terms on July 1, 1983 (see former§ 39-4914) and were repealed by S.L. 1994, ch. 283, § 1, effective July 1, 2004.

§ 39-4902. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Cooperative agreement” means a written agreement between two (2) or more health care providers for the sharing, allocation or referral of patients, or the sharing or allocation of personnel, instructional programs, support services and facilities, medical, diagnostic, therapeutic or procedures or other services customarily offered by health care providers.
  2. “Certificate of public advantage” means a document issued by the attorney general to parties to a cooperative agreement, verifying that the attorney general declares that the purposes and objectives of the cooperative agreement meet the standards for such agreements set forth by statute.
  3. “Health care provider” means any person or health care facility licensed, registered, certified, permitted or otherwise officially recognized by the state to provide health care services in this state; or, in the case of a freestanding outpatient facility, one for which a facility fee is charged for health care services performed within.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4902, as added by 1994, ch. 283, § 2, p. 883.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4902 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-4901.

§ 39-4903. Cooperative agreements — Certification.

  1. A health care provider may negotiate and enter into cooperative agreements with other health care providers in the state if the likely benefits resulting from the agreements outweigh the disadvantages attributable to a reduction in competition that may result from such agreements.
  2. Parties to a cooperative agreement may apply to the Idaho attorney general for a certificate of public advantage governing that cooperative agreement. The application must include an executed written copy of the cooperative agreement and describe the nature and scope of the cooperation in the agreement and any consideration passing to any party under the agreement.
  3. The attorney general shall review the application in accordance with the standards set forth in subsection (4) of this section and may hold a public hearing in accordance with rules adopted by the attorney general under chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. The attorney general shall grant or deny the application within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of the application and that decision must be in writing and set forth the basis for the decision. The attorney general shall furnish a copy of the decision to the applicants and any intervenor.
  4. The attorney general shall issue a certificate of public advantage for a cooperative agreement if he determines that the applicants have demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the likely benefits resulting from the agreement outweigh any disadvantages attributable to a reduction in competition that may result from the agreement.
  5. In evaluating the potential benefits of a cooperative agreement, the attorney general shall consider whether one (1) or more of the following benefits may result from such agreement:
    1. The quality of health care provided to the consumers in the state will be enhanced;
    2. A hospital, if any, and other health care facilities that customarily serve the communities in the area likely affected by the cooperative agreement will be preserved;
    3. Services provided by the parties to the cooperative agreement will gain cost efficiency;
    4. The utilization of health care resources and equipment in the area likely affected by the cooperative agreement will improve;
    5. Duplication of health care resources in the area likely affected by the cooperative agreement will be avoided.
  6. The attorney general’s evaluation of any disadvantages attributable to any reduction in competition likely to result from the cooperative agreement may include, but need not be limited to, the following:
    1. The likely adverse impact, if any, on the ability of health maintenance organizations, preferred provider plans, hospital provider organizations, persons performing utilization review, or other health care payers to negotiate optimal payment and service arrangements with hospitals and other health care providers;
    2. Whether any reduction in competition among physicians, allied health professionals or other health care providers is likely to result directly or indirectly from the cooperative agreement; (c) Whether any arrangements that are less restrictive to competition could likely achieve substantially the same benefits or a more favorable balance of benefits over disadvantages than that likely to be achieved from reducing competition.
  7. Participants in an approved cooperative agreement issued under the provisions of this section are immune from civil enforcement action and criminal prosecution for actions that might otherwise violate antitrust laws of the state of Idaho taken in furtherance of the cooperative agreement. Nothing in this section shall limit the authority of the attorney general to initiate civil enforcement or criminal prosecution if he determines that the health care providers have exceeded the scope of the cooperative agreement approved under this act.
  8. The attorney general may request periodic written updates of the progress of the approved cooperative agreement. If updates are requested, the attorney general shall specify the intervals at which they must be submitted, which shall not be less than every ninety (90) days.
  9. Nothing in this act shall obligate health care providers to submit a request for approval of a cooperative agreement as set forth under the provisions of this section. Any person who implements any cooperative action or agreement without securing the approval of the attorney general under the provisions of this section is subject to any civil or criminal enforcement action for violations that may result from this action.
  10. It is the intent of this section to require the state of Idaho, through the office of the attorney general, to provide direction, supervision and control over approved cooperative agreements entered into under the provisions of this section. To achieve the goals specified in this section, this state direction, supervision and control of cooperative agreements will provide state action immunity under federal antitrust laws to health care providers who participate in discussions or negotiations authorized in this section, and to persons authorized by such persons to implement cooperative agreements.
  11. The attorney general may adopt rules for the implementation of this act, including rules establishing procedures and criteria for the review and evaluation of proposed cooperative agreements under this act. Rules adopted shall ensure that there is opportunity for public comment during the review and evaluation of proposed cooperative agreements.
  12. If the attorney general determines that the benefits resulting from or likely to result from a cooperative agreement under a certificate of public advantage no longer outweighs any disadvantages attributable to any actual or potential reduction in competition resulting from the cooperative agreement, he may revoke the certificate of public advantage governing the agreement and, if revoked, shall so notify the holders of the certificate. A holder of a certificate of public advantage whose certificate is revoked by the attorney general may contest the revocation by sending a written request for a hearing to the attorney general within ten (10) days after receipt of the notice of revocation.
  13. If a party to a cooperative agreement that is issued a certificate of public advantage terminates its participation in the agreement, the party shall file a notice of termination with the attorney general within thirty (30) days after the termination takes effect. If all parties to the cooperative agreement terminate their participation in the agreement, the attorney general shall revoke the certificate of public advantage for the agreement.
  14. The attorney general shall maintain files on all cooperative agreements for which certificates of public advantage are issued and that are in effect.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4903, as added by 1994, ch. 283, § 2, p. 883.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4903 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-4901.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” in subsections (7), (9), and (11) refer to S.L. 1994, ch. 283, which is compiled as§§ 39-4901 through 39-4904.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

A.L.R.

A.L.R. — Application of Clayton Act to Mergers and Acquisitions of Hospitals and Healthcare Systems (15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27). 13 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 7.

§ 39-4904. Judicial review.

Any applicant or intervenor aggrieved by a decision of the attorney general in granting or denying an application for a certificate of public advantage, refusing to act on such application or termination of a certificate of public advantage, is entitled to judicial review of the decision in accordance with chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4904, as added by 1994, ch. 283, § 2, p. 883.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-4904 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-4901.

Chapter 50 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR DISPLACED HOMEMAKER ACT

Sec.

§ 39-5001. Policy.

The policy of the state of Idaho is hereby declared to be a recognition of the increasing number of persons in the state who, having fulfilled the valuable role of homemaker, find themselves displaced because of death or disability of spouse, or divorce or other loss of family income. As a consequence, displaced homemakers have an insufficient income; high rate of unemployment due to age, lack of paid work experience and discrimination; and limited opportunities to collect funds of assistance from social security, unemployment compensation, medicaid or other health insurance benefits, or pension plans of the spouse. This chapter seeks to coordinate efforts by state and local public agencies in cooperation with private agencies and organizations to assist displaced homemakers to continue as productive citizens, even though their role has necessarily changed.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4901 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 61, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Two 1980 acts, chapters 121 and 333, purported to create a new chapter 49 in Title 39. Chapter 121 was compiled as Title 39, ch. 49 (§§ 39-4901 to 39-4914) and has since been repealed and replaced by current§§ 39-4901 to 39-4904. Chapter 333 was codified by the compiler as chapter 50 of Title 39 through the use of brackets. Sections 39-5002 and 39-5003 were amended and redesignated in 1999 and 1982, respectively, to unique code numbers. The remaining sections enacted by S.L. 1980, ch. 333 were permanently redesignated by S.L. 2005, chapter 25.

§ 39-5002. Definitions.

For purposes of this chapter:

  1. “Displaced homemaker” means a person who:
    1. Has worked in the home providing household services for family members, but who has lost the primary source of economic support and who must gain employment skills in order to earn a living; or
    2. Is a single parent with primary financial and custodial responsibility for supporting dependent children and who must gain employment skills in order to earn a living.
  2. “Administrator” means the administrator of the division of career technical education.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4902 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 1999, ch. 329, § 23, p. 852; am. 2000, ch. 292, § 1, p. 1007; am. 2016, ch. 25, § 37, p. 35.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board for career-technical education,§ 33-2202.

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 25, substituted “division of career technical education” for “division of professional-technical education” at the end of subsection (2).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was enacted as§ 39-4902 by S.L. 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; however, § 23 of S.L. 1999, ch. 329 amended the section as§ 39-5002.

§ 39-5003. Service centers.

The administrator is authorized to establish multipurpose service centers for displaced homemakers. Each center shall have an advisory board appointed by the administrator in consultation with the director of the center. Such board shall consist of individuals representing displaced homemakers, organizations and agencies providing services beneficial to displaced homemakers, and the general public.

Each center shall include the following services:

  1. Job counseling services designed for a displaced homemaker;
  2. Job training and placement services developed in cooperation with public and private employers to train displaced homemakers for available jobs in the public and private sectors, taking into account the skills and job experiences of a homemaker and to assist displaced homemakers in gaining admission to existing public and private job training programs;
  3. Health education and counseling services with respect to general principles of preventative health care, mental health, alcohol and drug addiction and other related health care matters;
  4. Financial management services which provide information and assistance with respect to insurance, taxes, estate and probate problems, mortgages, loans and other related financial matters; and
  5. Educational services including information about courses offering credit through secondary and postsecondary education programs and information about other services determined to be of interest and benefit to displaced homemakers.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4903 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 1982, ch. 20, § 1, p. 24.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was enacted as§ 39-4903 by S.L. 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; however, § 1 of S.L. 1982, ch. 20 amended the section as§ 39-5003.

§ 39-5004. Site selection.

  1. In selecting sites for the centers established under this chapter, the administrator shall consider:
    1. The needs of each region of the state for a center;
    2. The needs of both urban and rural communities; and
    3. The availability of existing facilities adaptable for use as a center.
  2. The administrator may select a public or nonprofit private organization to administer the centers.
  3. The administrator is authorized to enter into contracts with and make grants to the organizations selected for the purpose of establishing and administering centers under this chapter.
  4. The administrator shall cooperate with other state, local and federal agencies to coordinate, through the service centers, all programs applicable to displaced homemakers and to avoid duplication of services.
  5. To the greatest extent possible, the staff of the service centers established under this chapter, including supervisory, technical and administrative positions, shall be filled by displaced homemakers. Where necessary, potential staff members shall be provided with on-the-job training.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-4904 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 62, p. 82.

§ 39-5005. Eligibility and fees.

The administrator with the advice of the staff at the centers, shall promulgate rules concerning the eligibility of persons to receive assistance through the multipurpose service centers. A sliding fee may be charged for services at the discretion of the director of the center.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4905 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 63, p. 82.

§ 39-5006. Grants and gifts.

The director of the center may, with approval of the administrator, apply for and accept any funds, grants, gifts or services made available by any agency or department of the federal government or any private agency or individual, which funds shall be used to carry out the total program of the centers.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4906 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 64, p. 82.

§ 39-5007. Reports of each center.

The director of each center shall report to the administrator or his/her designee, and shall evaluate the effectiveness of the job training, placement and service to displaced homemakers, including the number of persons trained, the number of persons placed in employment, follow-up data on such persons, the number of persons served by the various service programs, and cost effectiveness of the various components of the center. The administrator shall report annually to the education committees of the house of representatives and the senate of the legislature on the status of the displaced homemaker program. The report shall be filed not later than the fifteenth legislative day and in addition to compilations of the information received from each center, may include recommendations of the administrator relating to the program.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4907 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 65, p. 82.

§ 39-5008. Discrimination prohibited.

No person shall, on the ground of sex, age, race, color, religion, national origin or disability, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity made available under this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-4908 as added by 1980, ch. 333, § 1, p. 859; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 66, p. 82; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 29, p. 542.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, substituted “origin or disability” for “origin or handicap.”

§ 39-5009. Displaced homemaker account — Fees on filing of divorce action.

  1. There is hereby created in the state operating fund the displaced homemaker account. All fees collected pursuant to subsection (2) of this section shall be deposited in the account. All moneys in the account shall be available for appropriation to the state board for career technical education for the purposes of this chapter.
  2. In addition to any other fees imposed for filing an action for divorce in the district court, there shall be collected a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) for each divorce action. The clerk of the district court shall remit such fees, separately identified, to the state treasurer for deposit in the displaced homemaker account. Fees shall be remitted to the state treasurer at the same time as other court fees are remitted.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5009, as added by 1982, ch. 187, § 1, p. 505; am. 1999, ch. 329, § 24, p. 852; am. 2016, ch. 25, § 38, p. 35.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board for career-technical education,§ 33-2202.

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 25, substituted “state board for career technical education” for “state board for professional-technical education” near the end of subsection (1).

Chapter 51 FAMILY SUPPORT AND IN-HOME ASSISTANCE

Sec.

§ 39-5100. Legislative findings.

The legislature of the state of Idaho finds that:

  1. Families are the major providers of support, care, information, training, and other services to their family members with developmental disabilities.
  2. Families with individuals who have developmental disabilities may experience extraordinary financial outlays, physical and emotional challenges, and daily stress.
  3. Failure to provide the necessary services and supports to families with a member with developmental disabilities can result in admission of the individual to institutional care.
  4. Flexible and coordinated support and assistance to families avoids duplication of services, uses existing resources more efficiently, and prevents gaps in services to families.
  5. A family’s ability to make informed decisions regarding in-home or out-of-home living arrangements for a member who has a developmental disability is critical to the quality and cost-effective care of their family member.
  6. Family support and in-home assistance promotes and enhances the family’s capacity to provide care.
  7. Family support and in-home assistance stimulates the formation of community supports to use public dollars more efficiently.

Therefore, it is in the interest of the state of Idaho to provide in-home assistance for families for supports that enable family members with developmental disabilities to reside at home.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5100, as added by 1997, ch. 33, § 2, p. 56.

§ 39-5101. Purpose.

This act authorizes a program of financial assistance to eligible families who agree to carry out home-based support for their family members with developmental disabilities.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5101, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 3, p. 56.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1981, ch. 234, which is compiled as§§ 39-5101 to 39-5106.

§ 39-5102. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Department” means the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  2. “Developmental disability” means a chronic disability of an individual which appears before the age of twenty-two (22) years of age and:
    1. Is attributable to an impairment, such as intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism or a condition found to be closely related to or similar to one (1) of these impairments that requires similar treatment or services, or is attributable to dyslexia resulting from such impairments; and
    2. Results in substantial functional limitations in three (3) or more of the following areas of major life activity: self-care, receptive and expressive language, learning, mobility, self-direction, capacity for independent living, or economic self-sufficiency; and
    3. Reflects the need for a combination and sequence of special, interdisciplinary treatment or other services which are of lifelong or extended duration and individually planned and coordinated.
  3. “Director” means the director of the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  4. “Family” means a group of interdependent persons residing in the same household and includes an individual with a developmental disability and one (1) or more of the following:
    1. A birth or adoptive mother or father, stepparent, brother, sister or any combination; or
    2. Extended blood relatives, such as a grandparent, aunt, uncle, nephew or niece; or
    3. Legal guardian.
  5. “In-home assistance application” means a written document describing the needs of an individual with developmental disabilities and specifying the services or supports required.
  6. “Institution” means any public or private residential facility which is licensed in the state of Idaho for the purpose of providing care and treatment for individuals with developmental disabilities.

The term “family” does not include paid providers of care.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5102, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 4, p. 56; am. 2010, ch. 235, § 30, p. 542.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 235, in paragraph (2)(a), substituted “intellectual disability” for “mental retardation”; and redesignated former subsection (6) as subsection (4), redesignating the subsequent subsections accordingly.

§ 39-5103. Standards for the provision of financial assistance.

The director of the Idaho department of health and welfare shall have the power and it shall be his duty to promulgate appropriate rules necessary to implement and enforce the following standards for the provision of in-home assistance:

  1. Financial assistance provided under this chapter shall not exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250) per month per individual, except that this limit may be waived by the department in cases of extraordinary need.
  2. The amount of a grant of assistance shall be made based upon the need for services as specified in section 39-5103(4), Idaho Code, without regard to the family’s income or eligibility for any other program administered by the department.
  3. Receipt of supports will be determined on an individual family basis. Support priorities will be determined with consideration for the following criteria:
    1. Families of individuals with a developmental disability who will be able to return to a home setting from an institution and to those families for whom supports will prevent placement of the member with a developmental disability in an institution;
    2. Severity of consequences without supports;
    3. Urgency of need;
    4. Availability of funds.
  4. Assistance moneys may be used for the following when no other assistance is available:
    1. Diagnostic and evaluative procedures;
    2. Purchase of special equipment;
    3. Specialized therapies;
    4. Special diets;
    5. Medical and dental care not covered under the family’s health insurance or other publicly funded programs;
    6. Home health or personal assistance services;
    7. Counseling for the individual or family, including behavior management;
    8. Respite care or out of the ordinary expenses related to supervised care according to the approved in-home assistance application, including necessary related sibling care;
    9. Environmental adaptations and technical assistance as necessary to permit successful integration and access;
    10. Special clothing including incontinence supplies;
    11. Necessary supports for participation in recreational services;
    12. Transportation;
    13. Housing modifications for the purpose of accessibility or ease in handling; and
    14. Similar or related costs.
  5. Families shall choose providers of services.
  6. Assistance moneys shall not be used for the payment of educational or educationally related services which properly are the responsibility of local public schools.
History.

(7) Supports under this chapter shall not replace or reduce other public benefits to families, or be considered as resources or income in any eligibility determination or sliding fee scale. History.

I.C.,§ 39-5103, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 5, p. 56.

§ 39-5104. Eligibility.

A family is eligible to participate in the family support and in-home assistance program if the family:

  1. Resides within the state of Idaho;
  2. Includes a family member with a developmental disability;
  3. Expresses willingness for the family member with a developmental disability to reside at home;
  4. Submits an in-home assistance application for the family member with a developmental disability;
  5. Obtains the agreed-upon services or equipment; and
  6. Accounts for the funds expended for the agreed-upon services and equipment.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5104, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 6, p. 56.

§ 39-5105. Discontinuance of assistance.

Assistance may be terminated under the following conditions:

  1. The family or individual requests termination;
  2. Death of the individual with a developmental disability;
  3. Eligibility criteria are no longer met; or
  4. Inadequate funds are available for continuance.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5105, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 7, p. 56.

§ 39-5106. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and cited as the “Developmental Disabilities Family Support and In-Home Assistance Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5106, as added by 1981, ch. 234, § 1, p. 472; am. 1997, ch. 33, § 8, p. 56.

Chapter 52 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT GRANTS

Sec.

§ 39-5201. Declaration of policy.

The legislature finds that domestic violence is an issue of growing concern. Research findings show that domestic violence constitutes a significant percentage of homicides, aggravated assaults, and assaults and batteries in the United States. Domestic violence is a disruptive influence on personal and community life and is often interrelated with a number of other family problems and stresses. Refuge for victims of domestic violence is essential to provide protection to victims from further abuse and physical harm. Refuge provides temporary safety and resources to victims who may not have access to such things if they remain in abusive situations.

It is the purpose of the legislature in the adoption of this chapter to provide funding for projects in the several areas of the state for the purpose of aiding victims of domestic violence and other crimes.

It is understood that the intention of the provisions of this chapter is not to supersede the authority or responsibilities of agencies of state government responsible for providing services to persons pursuant to the child protective act, crime victims compensation act or adult protective provisions in the Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5201, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 1, p. 1161.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Adult abuse, neglect and exploitation act,§ 39-5301 et seq.

Child protective act,§ 16-1601 et seq.

Crime victims compensation act,§ 72-1001 et seq.

Divorce, grounds and defenses,§ 32-601 et seq.

Marriage contract,§ 32-201 et seq.

Marriage licenses, certificates and records,§ 32-401 et seq.

Parent and child,§ 32-1001 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Two 1982 acts, chapters 181 and 286, purported to create a new chapter 52 in Title 39. Chapter 181 was compiled as Title 39, chapter 52 (§§ 39-5201 to 39-5213) while chapter 286 was designated by the compiler as Title 39, chapter 53 through the use of brackets. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1982, chapter 286 was made permanent by S.L. 1991, chapter 329.

§ 39-5202. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Domestic violence” means the physical injury, sexual abuse or forced imprisonment or threat thereof of a family or household member.
  2. “Family or household member” means one who is related by blood, marriage, or who resides or has resided with or has been married to the person committing the domestic violence.
  3. “Safe house” means a place available on an as needed basis for temporary residence to victims of domestic violence and their children.
  4. “Refuge” means a place available on a twenty-four (24) hour, seven (7) days a week basis, to provide temporary residence to victims of domestic violence and their children.
  5. “Crisis line” means an emergency twenty-four (24) hour telephone service staffed by persons able to provide information and referral to community services.
  6. “Council” means the Idaho council on domestic violence and victim assistance created in section 39-5203, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5202, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 2, p. 1161.

§ 39-5203. Council on domestic violence and victim assistance.

  1. The Idaho council on domestic violence and victim assistance is hereby established. The council shall be the advisory body for programs and services affecting victims of domestic violence and other crimes in Idaho.
  2. For budgetary purposes and for administrative support purposes, the council shall be assigned, by the governor, to a department or office within the state government.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5203, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 3, p. 1161.

§ 39-5204. Composition.

The council shall consist of seven (7) members appointed by the governor. At least one (1) member shall reside in each of the seven (7) [six (6)] substate regions established pursuant to section 39-104, Idaho Code. Members shall be representative of persons who have been victims of domestic violence, care providers, law enforcement officials, medical and mental health personnel, counselors, and interested and concerned members of the general public.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5204, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed inserted was added by the compiler to reflect the six substate regions created by the department of environmental quality pursuant to§ 39-104; Coeur d’Alene, Lewiston, Boise, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, and Twin Falls regions.

§ 39-5205. Appointment and term of office.

Each member of the council shall be appointed for a term of three (3) years, except that of the members first appointed; two (2) shall be appointed for a term of one (1) year, two (2) shall be appointed for a term of two (2) years, and three (3) shall be appointed for a term of three (3) years. If a vacancy occurs, a new member shall be appointed in accordance with the provisions of the original appointment for the unexpired portion of the vacated term. Members may be replaced because of poor attendance, lack of participation in the council’s work, or malfeasance in office.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5205, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469.

§ 39-5206. Compensation and expenses.

Members of the council shall be entitled to receive actual and necessary expenses plus compensation as provided in section 59-509(g), Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5206, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469.

§ 39-5207. Organization of council — Employment of necessary personnel.

  1. The council shall annually designate one (1) of its members to serve as chairman and one (1) member to serve as vice chairman, who shall act as chairman in the chairman’s absence. The chairman shall call meetings as provided in the rules of the council.
  2. The council shall adopt and amend rules governing its proceedings, activities and organization including, but not limited to, provisions governing a quorum, procedure, frequency and location of meetings, and establishment, functions and membership of council committees.
  3. The council may employ and shall fix the compensation, subject to provisions of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code, of such personnel as may be necessary including, but not limited to, an administrator, who shall be designated as the executive director of the council and who shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5207, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 4, p. 1161.

§ 39-5208. Responsibilities and duties.

The council shall:

  1. Establish standards for projects applying for grants from the council under this chapter;
  2. Disseminate information on availability of funds and the application process;
  3. Receive grant applications for the development and establishment of projects for victims of domestic violence and certain other crimes;
  4. Distribute funds after approval of projects meeting council standards;
  5. Assess, review and monitor the services and programs being provided for victims of domestic violence and other crimes under this chapter;
  6. Monitor programs and services for victims of domestic violence and other crimes to assure nonduplication of services and to encourage efficient and coordinated use of resources in the provision of services;
  7. Compile data on the services and programs provided to victims of domestic violence and other crimes and the geographic incidence of domestic violence and other crimes in this state; and
  8. Submit annual reports to the governor and the legislature.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5208, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 5, p. 1161.

§ 39-5209. Rules.

The council shall promulgate, adopt and amend rules and criteria to implement the provisions of this chapter regarding applications and grants for domestic violence project funding and for funding under any other grant program administered by the council. Such promulgation, adoption and amendment shall be in compliance with the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5209, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 6, p. 1161.

§ 39-5210. Eligible projects.

To be eligible for domestic violence grants pursuant to this chapter, a project must provide a safe house or refuge and a crisis line, except in the case of a project providing services to batterers. No funds may be granted to batterer programs from the domestic violence project account which are derived from marriage license or divorce fees. Other services which may be provided include, but are not limited to:

  1. Counseling;
  2. Educational services for community awareness, for prevention of domestic violence and for the care, treatment and rehabilitation of parties to domestic violence;
  3. Support groups;
  4. Assistance in obtaining legal, medical, psychological or vocational services.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5210, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 1990, ch. 243, § 1, p. 695; am. 1992, ch. 51, § 1, p. 156; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 7, p. 1161.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Domestic violence project account,§ 39-5212.

§ 39-5211. Qualifications of applicants.

To qualify for domestic violence grants under the provisions of this chapter, an applicant must:

  1. Propose to operate and provide an eligible project;
  2. Be a private, nonprofit corporation of the state of Idaho, or a public entity of the state of Idaho;
  3. Provide matching moneys equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the grant. The applicant may contribute to or provide the required local matching funds. The value of in-kind contributions and volunteer labor from the community may be computed and included as part of the local matching requirement;
  4. Require persons employed by or volunteering services to the project to maintain the confidentiality of any information that would identify individuals served by the project; such information identifying individuals served by the project shall be subject to disclosure according to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code;
  5. Require victims to reimburse the project monetarily or through volunteer efforts for services provided as they are able to do so. Minimum reimbursement may be established by the council, with a sliding scale of reimbursement based on the victim’s ability to pay;
  6. Provide a policy of nondiscrimination in its admissions and provision of services on the basis of race, religion, gender, color, age, marital status, national origin or ancestry.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5211, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 1990, ch. 213, § 45, p. 480; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 8, p. 1161; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 94, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” in subsection (4).

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993 and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 should take effect July 1, 1990.

§ 39-5212. Domestic violence project account.

There is hereby created in the state operating fund the domestic violence project account. Moneys received from the fees imposed by section 39-5213, Idaho Code, and section 39-6312, Idaho Code, shall be credited to the account and shall be perpetually appropriated to the council on domestic violence and victim assistance for grants for domestic violence projects and to meet the costs of maintaining the operation of the council.

Eligible projects shall be given priority by the council based upon an allocation of funds to projects in the seven (7) [six (6)] substate regions established pursuant to section 39-104, Idaho Code, in the proportion that marriage licenses are filed in each region.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5212, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 1990, ch. 243, § 2, p. 695; am. 2000, ch. 343, § 9, p. 1161.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed inserted was added by the compiler to reflect the six substate regions created by the department of environmental quality pursuant to§ 39-104; Coeur d’Alene, Lewiston, Boise, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, and Twin Falls regions.

§ 39-5213. Fee imposed.

  1. In addition to the fee due to the county recorder of each county of this state under the provisions of section 31-3205, Idaho Code, for the issuance of a marriage license, the recorder shall collect upon presentation of proper identification by the applicants an additional fee of fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each license issued, which additional fee shall be remitted to the state treasurer for credit to the “domestic violence project account” created in section 39-5212, Idaho Code.
  2. In addition to any other fee imposed for filing an action for divorce in the district court, there shall be collected a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) for each divorce action, separately identified, which additional fee shall be remitted to the state treasurer for credit to the domestic violence project account created in section 39-5212, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5213, as added by 1982, ch. 181, § 1, p. 469; am. 1990, ch. 244, § 1, p. 696.

Chapter 53 ADULT ABUSE, NEGLECT AND EXPLOITATION ACT

Sec.

§ 39-5301. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Adult Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5201, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 2, p. 846.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Medical Consent and Natural Death Act,§ 39-4501 et seq.

Protection of persons under disability,§ 15-5-101 et seq.

Residential care or assisted living act,§ 39-3301 et seq.

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 read, “The intent of this legislation is to ensure that the adult population (eighteen (18) years of age and older) in the state of Idaho is protected from abuse, neglect and exploitation through the joint efforts of the Idaho department of health and welfare and law enforcement services. A secondary purpose is to ensure that these protective services are provided in the least restrictive environment to assure maximum independence of the individuals served. Nothing in this act shall be construed to authorize or obligate the department to act or intervene in situations more appropriately addressed in the domestic violence act.”

Compiler’s Notes.

Two 1982 acts, chapters 181 and 286, purported to create a new chapter 52 in Title 39. Chapter 181 was compiled as Title 39, chapter 52 (§§ 39-5201 to 39-5213) while chapter 286 was designated by the compiler as Title 39, chapter 53 through the use of brackets. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1982, chapter 286 was made permanent by S.L. 1991, chapter 329.

§ 39-5301A. Declaration of policy.

  1. It is the intent of the adult abuse, neglect and exploitation act to authorize the fewest possible restrictions on the exercise of personal freedom and religious beliefs consistent with a vulnerable adult’s need for services and to empower vulnerable adults to protect themselves.
  2. The legislature recognizes that vulnerable adults sometimes experience difficulties managing their own affairs or are unable to protect themselves from abuse, neglect or exploitation. Often, vulnerable adults cannot find others who are able or willing to provide assistance.
  3. The commission is directed to investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, self-neglect or exploitation involving a vulnerable adult, to make appropriate referrals to law enforcement, and to arrange for the provision of necessary services. Further, the commission shall honor a vulnerable adult’s freedom of choice and right to self-determination. When it becomes necessary for the commission to assist a vulnerable adult, actions shall be tempered by the requirements of due process and must place the fewest possible restrictions on personal freedom. Services provided under this act are also intended to provide assistance to caregiving families experiencing difficulties in maintaining functionally impaired relatives in the household.
  4. In the process of carrying out its adult protective services responsibilities, the commission is directed to make effective use of multidisciplinary services available through any and all public agencies, community-based organizations, and informal resources.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5301A, as added by 1998, ch. 308, § 2, p. 1012; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 1, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “adult protective services” for “adult protection” near the beginning of subsection (4).

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in the last sentence in subsection (3) refers to S.L. 1998, Chapter 308, which is compiled as§§ 39-5301A to 39-5303, 39-5304 to 39-5306, and 39-5308 to 39-5310.

§ 39-5302. Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter:

  1. “Abuse” means the intentional or negligent infliction of physical pain, injury or mental injury.
  2. “Caretaker” means any individual or institution that is responsible by relationship, contract, or court order to provide food, shelter or clothing, or medical or other life-sustaining necessities to a vulnerable adult.
  3. “Commission” means the Idaho commission on aging, established pursuant to chapter 50, title 67, Idaho Code.
  4. “Department” means the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  5. “Emergency” means an exigent circumstance in which a vulnerable adult’s health and safety is placed in imminent danger. Imminent danger is when death or severe bodily injury could reasonably be expected to occur without intervention.
  6. “Exploitation” means an action that may include, but is not limited to, the unjust or improper use of a vulnerable adult’s financial power of attorney, funds, property, or resources by another person for profit or advantage.
  7. “Neglect” means failure of a caretaker to provide food, clothing, shelter or medical care reasonably necessary to sustain the life and health of a vulnerable adult, or the failure of a vulnerable adult to provide those services for himself.
  8. “Provider” means an area agency on aging or a person or an entity capable of providing adult protective services, including duly authorized agents and employees.
  9. “Supportive services” means noninvestigatory remedial, social, legal, health, educational, mental health and referral services provided to a vulnerable adult.
  10. “Vulnerable adult” means a person eighteen (18) years of age or older who is unable to protect himself from abuse, neglect or exploitation due to physical or mental impairment that affects the person’s judgment or behavior to the extent that he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate or implement decisions regarding his person.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to mean a person is abused, neglected, or exploited for the sole reason he is relying upon treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone in accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or religious denomination; nor shall the provisions of this chapter be construed to require any medical care or treatment in contravention of the stated or implied objection of such a person.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5202, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 3, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 1, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 3, p. 1012; am. 2008, ch. 209, § 2, p. 663; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 2, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq

Amendments.

The 2008 amendment, by ch. 209, in subsection (7), substituted “unjust or improper use” for “misuse,” and inserted “financial power of attorney.”

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, deleted former subsection (4), which read: “Contractor’ means an area agency on aging and its duly authorized agents and employees providing adult protection services pursuant to a contract with the commission in accordance with section 67-5011, Idaho Code. The commission designates area agencies on aging pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. 3025(a)(2)(A) and may establish by rule when duties or obligations under this chapter may be fulfilled by an area agency on aging”; redesignated former subsections (5) to (8) as present subsections (4) to (7); and added present subsection (8).

Compiler’s Notes.

Two 1982 acts, chapters 181 and 286, purported to create a new chapter 52 in Title 39. Chapter 181 was compiled as Title 39, chapter 52 (§§ 39-5201 to 39-5213) while chapter 286 was designated by the compiler as Title 39, chapter 53 through the use of brackets. The redesignation of the sections enacted by S.L. 1982, chapter 286 was made permanent by S.L. 1991, chapter 329.

§ 39-5303. Duty to report cases of abuse, neglect or exploitation of vulnerable adults.

  1. Any physician, nurse, employee of a public or private health facility, or a state-licensed or certified residential facility serving vulnerable adults, medical examiner, dentist, osteopath, optometrist, chiropractor, podiatrist, social worker, police officer, pharmacist, physical therapist, or home care worker who has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is being or has been abused, neglected or exploited shall immediately report such information to the commission. Provided however, that nursing facilities defined in section 39-1301(b), Idaho Code, and employees of such facilities shall make reports required under this chapter to the department. When there is reasonable cause to believe that abuse or sexual assault has resulted in death or serious physical injury jeopardizing the life, health or safety of a vulnerable adult, any person required to report under this section shall also report such information within four (4) hours to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
  2. Failure to report as provided under this section is a misdemeanor subject to punishment as provided in section 18-113, Idaho Code. If an employee at a state licensed or certified residential facility fails to report abuse or sexual assault that has resulted in death or serious physical injury jeopardizing the life, health or safety of a vulnerable adult as provided under this section, the department shall also have the authority to:
    1. Revoke the facility’s license and/or contract with the state to provide services;
    2. Deny payment;
    3. Assess and collect a civil monetary penalty with interest from the facility owner and/or facility administrator;
    4. Appoint temporary management;
    5. Close the facility and/or transfer residents to another certified facility;
    6. Direct a plan of correction;
    7. Ban admission of persons with certain diagnoses or requiring specialized care;
    8. Ban all admissions to the facility;
    9. Assign monitors to the facility; or
    10. Reduce the licensed bed capacity.
  3. Any person, including any officer or employee of a financial institution, who has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is being abused, neglected or exploited may report such information to the commission or its providers.
  4. The commission and its providers shall make training available to officers and employees of financial institutions in identifying and reporting instances of abuse, neglect or exploitation involving vulnerable adults.
  5. Any person who makes any report pursuant to this chapter, or who testifies in any administrative or judicial proceeding arising from such report, or who is authorized to provide supportive or emergency services pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability on account of such report, testimony or services provided in good faith, except that such immunity shall not extend to perjury, reports made in bad faith or with malicious purpose nor, in the case of provision of services, in the presence of gross negligence under the existing circumstances. (6) Any person who makes a report or allegation in bad faith, with malice or knowing it to be false, shall be liable to the party against whom the report was made for the amount of actual damages sustained or statutory damages in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500), whichever is greater, plus attorney’s fees and costs of suit. If the court finds that the defendant acted with malice or oppression, the court may award treble actual damages or treble statutory damages, whichever is greater.

Any action taken by the department pursuant to this subsection shall be appealable as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5203, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 213, § 46, p. 480; am. 1991, ch. 329, § 4, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 2, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 4, p. 1012; am. 1998, ch. 396, § 1, p. 1240; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 119, p. 799; am. 2018, ch. 56, § 1, p. 141; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 3, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 1998 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together. However, the two acts added and redesignated subsections differently. The compiler initially resolved the differences which were permanently resolved by the amendment of this section by S.L. 2000, chapter 274.

The 1998 amendment, by ch. 308, § 4, in subsection (1), at the end of the first sentence, deleted “of health and welfare” following “under this chapter to the department”, added present subsections (2) and (3), redesignated former subsection 2 as present subsection (4), and in present subsection (4), deleted “provision of” following “testimony or,” and inserted “provided in good faith,” and added subsection (5).

The 1998 amendment, by ch. 396, § 1, added the present second sentence in subsection (1); designated the second sentence of former subsection (1) as the first sentence of present subsection (2), and added the second sentence of subsection (2), and its subdivisions, and redesignated former subsection (2) as present subsection (3).

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 56, deleted “ombudsman for the elderly” preceding “osteopath, optometrist” in the first sentence of subsection (1).

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “providers” for “contractors” near the end of subsection (3) and near the beginning of subsection (4).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which was enacted as§ 39-5203 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5303 by § 46 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213.

Section 4 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 stated that “Section 39-5303, Idaho Code, as amended in Section 46, Chapter 286, Laws of 1990 be amended”. However,§ 39-5303 was amended by § 46 of ch. 213, Laws of 1990 and not ch. 286.

§ 39-5303A. Exemption from duty to report — Limited application of exemption.

  1. The requirements set forth in section 39-5303, Idaho Code, pertaining to the reporting of instances of abuse, neglect or exploitation of a vulnerable adult to the commission or the department shall not apply to situations involving resident-to-resident contact within public or private health facilities or state licensed or certified facilities which serve vulnerable adults, except in those cases involving sex abuse, death or serious physical injury that jeopardizes the life, health or safety of a vulnerable adult or repeated resident-to-resident physical or verbal altercations, not resulting in observable physical or mental injury, but constituting an ongoing pattern of resident behavior that a facility’s staff are unable to remedy through reasonable efforts.
  2. This exemption applies only to reports involving resident-to-resident abuse that are to be directed to the commission or the department pursuant to section 39-5303, Idaho Code. This exemption shall not limit any other reporting obligation or requirement whether statutory or otherwise.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5303A, as added by 2000, ch. 104, § 1, p. 232.

§ 39-5304. Reporting requirements, investigation, emergency access.

  1. When a report is required pursuant to this chapter, such report shall be made immediately to the commission or appropriate provider. Provided however, that nursing facilities defined in section 39-1301(b), Idaho Code, and employees of such facilities shall make reports required under this chapter to the department. If known, the report shall contain the name and address of the vulnerable adult; the caretaker; the alleged perpetrator; the nature and extent of suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation; and any other information that will be of assistance in the investigation.
  2. If the allegations in the report indicate that an emergency exists, the commission or provider must initiate an investigation immediately and initiate contact with the alleged vulnerable adult within twenty-four (24) hours from the time the report is received. All other investigations must be initiated within seventy-two (72) hours from the time the report is received.
  3. The investigation shall include a determination of the nature, extent and cause of the abuse, neglect, or exploitation, examination of evidence and consultation with persons thought to have knowledge of the circumstances, and identification, if possible, of the person alleged to be responsible for the abuse, neglect or exploitation of the vulnerable adult.
  4. Where no emergency exists, the commission or provider may determine, based on the review of the report and any initial inquiries, that an interview with the vulnerable adult is not necessary to the investigation. If the commission or provider determines that an interview is necessary, the preferred method of interviewing is by means of a personal visit with the vulnerable adult in the adult’s dwelling. Alternatively, the interview may occur in the local office of the commission or provider, or by telephone conversation, or by any other means available to the commission or provider. Decisions regarding the method of conducting any interview will be within the discretion of the commission or provider.
  5. Upon completion of an investigation, the commission or provider shall prepare a written report of the investigation. The name of the person making the original report or any person mentioned in the report shall not be disclosed unless those persons specifically request such disclosure or unless the disclosure is made pursuant to the commission’s duty to notify law enforcement as required in section 39-5310, Idaho Code, to a request to law enforcement for emergency access, a court order or hearing.

If the abuse, neglect, or exploitation is substantiated to have occurred in a state-certified or licensed facility, a copy of the findings shall be sent to the licensing and certification office of the department.

If the commission or provider determines that a report is unsubstantiated and that no other law has been violated, all records related to the report shall be expunged no later than three (3) years following the completion of the investigation.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5304, as added by 1991, ch. 329, § 5, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 3, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 5, p. 1012; am. 2000, ch. 104, § 2, p. 232; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 120, p. 799; am. 2001, ch. 79, § 1, p. 199; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 4, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2000 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 104, § 2, at the end of the first and second sentences in subsection (2), added “from the time the report is received”; in subsection (4), deleted the former first sentence which read: “The investigation shall include an interview with the vulnerable adult, if possible”, in the present first sentence, substituted “Where no emergency exists, the commission or contractor may determine, based on the review of the report and any initial inquiries, that an interview with the vulnerable adult is not necessary to the investigation, the preferred method of interviewing is” for “The commission or contractor shall conduct the interview, preferably,”, in the present second sentence, substituted “Alternatively,” for “If that is not possible”, and added the last sentence.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 274, § 120, in the second sentence of subsection (1), deleted “skilled” preceding “nursing facilities”.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “provider” for “contractor” throughout the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-5304, enacted as§ 39-5204 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5306 by § 8 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

§ 39-5305. Inspections — Right of entry.

  1. Upon receiving information that a vulnerable adult is alleged to be abused, neglected, or exploited, the commission or provider shall cause such investigation to be made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter as is appropriate. In making the investigation, the commission or provider shall use its own resources and may enlist the cooperation of peace officers. In an emergency, any authorized commission employee or provider shall enlist the cooperation of a peace officer to ensure the safety of the vulnerable adult and shall receive the peace officer’s assistance. Assistance in an emergency may include entry on private or public property where a vulnerable adult is allegedly subject to abuse, neglect or exploitation, and the removal and transportation of the vulnerable adult to a medical facility, care-providing facility, or other appropriate and safe environment.
  2. In a nonemergency, any peace officer may cooperate with an authorized commission employee or provider in ensuring the safety of a vulnerable adult who has been abused, neglected or exploited, including a vulnerable adult living in a condition of self-neglect. Assistance shall be provided only with the consent of the vulnerable adult or his legal representative.
  3. For the purposes of implementing or enforcing any provision of this chapter or any rule authorized under the provisions of this chapter, any duly authorized commission employee or provider may, upon presentation of appropriate credentials at any reasonable time, with consent or in an emergency, enter upon any private or public property where a vulnerable adult allegedly is subject to abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
  4. All inspections and searches conducted under the provisions of this chapter shall be performed in conformity with the prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures contained in the fourth amendment to the constitution of the United States and article I, section 17, of the constitution of the state of Idaho. The state shall not, under the authority granted in this chapter, conduct warrantless administrative searches of private property except with consent, or in an emergency.
  5. If consent to entry is not given, a commission employee or provider with the assistance of the county prosecutor may obtain, and any magistrate or district judge is authorized to issue, a search warrant upon showing that probable cause exists to believe a vulnerable adult is subject to abuse, neglect or exploitation. Upon request of a commission employee or provider, a peace officer shall serve the search warrant.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5305, as added by 1991, ch. 329, § 6, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 4, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 6, p. 1012; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 5, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “provider” for “contractor” throughout the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-5305, which was enacted as§ 39-5205 by S.L. 1982 ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5305 by § 47 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 and was further amended and redesignated as§ 39-5307 by § 9 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993 and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 should take effect July 1, 1990.

§ 39-5306. Supportive services and disclosure.

  1. If there is substantiated abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult, the commission or provider has the responsibility to assist the adult in obtaining available services.
  2. If the commission or provider develops a plan of supportive services for the vulnerable adult, the plan shall provide for appropriate supportive services available to the vulnerable adult that are least restrictive to personal freedom and shall provide encouragement for client self-determination and continuity of care.
  3. If the vulnerable adult does not consent to the receipt of reasonable and necessary supportive services, or if the vulnerable adult withdraws consent, services shall not be provided or continued.
  4. If the commission or provider determines that a vulnerable adult is an incapacitated person as defined in section 15-5-101(a), Idaho Code, mentally ill as defined in section 66-317, Idaho Code, or developmentally disabled as defined in section 66-402, Idaho Code, the commission or provider may petition the court for protective proceedings, appointment of a guardian or conservator and such other relief as may be provided by chapter 5, title 15, Idaho Code, and chapters 3 and 4, title 66, Idaho Code.
  5. An employee or provider of the commission shall not be appointed the guardian or conservator of a vulnerable adult unless the commission employee or provider has a spousal or familial relationship with the vulnerable adult.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5204, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 8, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 5, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 7, p. 1012; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 6, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5306, which was enacted as§ 39-5206 by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was repealed by S.L. 1991, ch. 329, § 7.

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “provider” for “contractor” throughout the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § [39-5304] 39-5204.

§ 39-5307. Access to records.

Any person, department, agency or commission authorized to carry out the duties enumerated in this chapter shall have access to all relevant records, which shall be subject to disclosure according to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code, and shall only be divulged with the written consent of the vulnerable adult or his legal representative. No medical records of any vulnerable adult may be divulged for any purpose without the express written consent of such person or his legal representative, or pursuant to other proper judicial process.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5205, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 213, § 47, p. 480; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 9, p. 846; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 95, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” in the first sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-5305.

Former§ 39-5307, which was enacted as§ 39-5207 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5308 by § 10 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993 and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 should take effect July 1, 1990.

§ 39-5308. Interagency cooperation.

  1. In performing the duties set forth in this chapter, the commission or provider may request the assistance of the staffs and resources of all appropriate state departments, agencies and commissions, and local health directors, and may utilize any other public or private agencies, groups or individuals who are appropriate and who may be available. Interagency cooperation shall include the involvement, when appropriate, of law enforcement personnel, department personnel, medical personnel, and any other person or entity deemed necessary due to their specialized training in providing services to vulnerable adults. Interagency cooperation may also include access to client information necessary for the provision of services to vulnerable adults.
  2. The commission shall provide to the department on at least a quarterly basis a listing of all alleged perpetrators against whom an allegation of adult abuse, neglect or exploitation has been substantiated. Upon request, all available supportive information shall be provided to enable the department to conduct criminal background checks and other required investigations.
  3. The department shall provide to the commission or provider any report received under this chapter from a nursing facility defined in section 39-1301(b), Idaho Code, or an employee of such facility.
  4. The commission or provider shall provide the department with any report received under this chapter involving allegations of abuse, neglect or exploitation occurring in a nursing facility as defined in section 39-1301(b), Idaho Code.
  5. The commission, providers, and the department shall use interagency staffing when necessary and share client and facility information necessary to provide services to vulnerable adults.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5207, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 10, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 6, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 8, p. 1012; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 121, p. 199; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 7, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “provider” or “providers” for “contractor” or “contractors” throughout the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § [39-5307] 39-5207.

Section 39-5308, which was enacted as§ 39-5208 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5309 by § 12 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

§ 39-5309. Coordination of services.

Subsequent to the authorization for the provision of reasonable and necessary emergency and support services, the commission or provider shall initiate a review of each case at reasonable intervals over a reasonable period of time as the commission or provider deems necessary based upon the circumstances in each individual case to determine whether continuation or modification of the services provided is warranted. A decision to continue the provision of such services should be made in concert with appropriate personnel from state agencies, departments, service providers and others, and shall comply with the consent provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5208, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 12, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 7, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 9, p. 1012; am. 2019, ch. 43, § 8, p. 116.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5309, which was enacted as§ 39-5209 by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was repealed by S.L. 1991, ch. 329, § 11.

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 43, substituted “provider” for “contractor” twice in the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section which was enacted as§ 39-5208 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2 and compiled as § [39-5308] 39-5208 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5309 by § 12 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

§ 39-5310. Report to law enforcement — Prosecution.

  1. If, as the result of any investigation initiated under the provisions of this chapter, it appears that the abuse, neglect, or exploitation has caused injury or a serious imposition on the rights of the vulnerable adult, the commission shall immediately notify the appropriate law enforcement agency which shall initiate an investigation and shall determine whether criminal proceedings should be initiated against the caretaker or other persons in accordance with applicable state law. Notwithstanding the prohibition against disclosure of names of persons associated with the written report of an investigation as provided in section 39-5304, Idaho Code, the commission shall disclose names associated with the written report when notification is made as required in this section.
  2. The abuse, neglect or exploitation of a vulnerable adult is a crime under section 18-1505, Idaho Code, and is subject to punishments provided in that section and other applicable state law.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5310, as added by 1991, ch. 329, § 13, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 8, p. 246; am. 1998, ch. 308, § 10, p. 1012; am. 2001, ch. 79, § 2, p. 199; am. 2005, ch. 166, § 3, p. 506.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§39-5310 which was enacted as§ 39-5210 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734 and was compiled as § [39-5310] 39-5210, was repealed by S.L. 1991, ch. 329, § 11.

§ 39-5311. Effect of actions taken pursuant to the natural death act.

Any action taken by a physician or health facility pursuant to an agreement with a vulnerable adult in accordance with the provisions of chapter 45, title 39, Idaho Code, shall not be construed to constitute abuse, exploitation, or neglect, so long as it is consistent with the withholding or withdrawal of artificial life-sustaining procedures from a qualified patient.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5211, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 14, p. 846.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which was enacted as§ 39-5211 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5311 by § 14 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

§ 39-5312. Rules.

The director of the commission shall have the authority to adopt, promulgate and enforce such rules as he deems necessary in carrying out the provisions of this chapter, subject to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5212, as added by 1982, ch. 286, § 2, p. 734; am. and redesig. 1991, ch. 329, § 15, p. 846; am. 1996, ch. 78, § 9, p. 246.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which was enacted as§ 39-5212 by S.L. 1982, ch. 286, § 2, was amended and redesignated as§ 39-5312 by § 15 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329.

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 read: “SECTION 111. Sections 1, 2, 46 and 47 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1990. All other sections of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1993.”

Section 17 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 declared an emergency and provided that Section 16 should be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval. Approved April 5, 1991.

Chapter 54 ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

Sec.

§ 39-5401. Definitions.

As used in this act:

  1. “Artificial insemination” means introduction of semen of a donor as defined herein, into a woman’s vagina, cervical canal or uterus through the use of instruments or other artificial means.
  2. “Donor” refers to a man who is not the husband of the woman upon whom the artificial insemination is performed.
History.

1982, ch. 349, § 1, p. 862.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Medical practice act,§ 54-1801 et seq.

Parent and child,§ 32-1001 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1982, ch. 349, which is compiled as§§ 39-5401 to 39-5407.

§ 39-5402. Performed only by physician.

Only physicians licensed under chapter 18, title 54, Idaho Code, and persons under their supervision may select artificial insemination donors and perform artificial insemination.

History.

1982, ch. 349, § 2, p. 862.

§ 39-5403. Consent — Filing and notice requirements.

  1. Artificial insemination shall not be performed upon a woman without her prior written request and consent and the prior written request and consent of her husband.
  2. Whenever a child is born who may have been conceived by artificial insemination, a copy of the request and consent required under subsection (1) of this section shall be filed by the physician who performs the artificial insemination with the state registrar of vital statistics. The state board of health and welfare shall have the authority to promulgate rules and regulations and to prescribe methods and forms of reporting, and fees to carry out the provisions of this act. Storage, retrieval and confidentiality of records shall be governed by chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code.
  3. The information filed under subsection (2) of this section shall be sealed by the state registrar and may be opened only upon an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, except that pursuant to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code, data contained in such records may be used for research and statistical purposes.
  4. If the physician who performs the artificial insemination does not deliver the child conceived as a result of the artificial insemination, it is the duty of the mother and her husband to give that physician notice of the child’s birth. The physician who performs the artificial insemination shall not be liable for noncompliance with subsection (2) of this section if the noncompliance is a result of the failure of the mother and her husband to notify the physician of the birth.
History.

1982, ch. 349, § 3, p. 862; am. 1990, ch. 213, § 48, p. 480; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 96, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of health and welfare,§ 56-1005.

State registrar of vital statistics,§ 39-243.

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” at the end of subsection (2) and in subsection (3).

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1982, ch. 349, which is compiled as§§ 39-5401 to 39-5407.

Effective Dates.

Section 8 of S.L. 1982, ch. 349 read: “The provisions of this act shall be effective on July 1, 1982, except subsections (2), (3) and (4) of section 3 [§ 39-5403] which shall take effect on July 1, 1983.” Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213 as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329 provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993 and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 should take effect July 1, 1990.

§ 39-5404. Restrictions on semen donations.

No semen shall be donated for use in artificial insemination by any person who:

  1. Has any disease or defect known by him to be transmissible by genes; or
  2. Knows or has reason to know he has a venereal disease.
History.

1982, ch. 349, § 4, p. 862.

§ 39-5405. Rights of donor, child, husband.

  1. The donor shall have no right, obligation or interest with respect to a child born as a result of the artificial insemination.
  2. A child born as a result of the artificial insemination shall have no right, obligation or interest with respect to such donor.
  3. The relationship, rights and obligation between a child born as a result of artificial insemination and the mother’s husband shall be the same for all legal intents and purposes as if the child had been naturally and legitimately conceived by the mother and the mother’s husband, if the husband consented to the performance of artificial insemination.
History.

1982, ch. 349, § 5, p. 862.

CASE NOTES

Non-parent Custody.

The Idaho supreme court’s decision in Stockwell v. Stockwell , 116 Idaho 297, 775 P.2d 611 (1989) is not a key to the courthouse for non-parents seeking custody of minor children. Nor has the Idaho legislature, as of June 2017, adopted a statutory framework that would enable the unmarried partner of a biological mother to seek custody or visitation of an artificially conceived child. Doe v. Doe, 162 Idaho 254, 395 P.3d 1287 (2017).

Standing.

Mother’s partner had no standing to claim, on behalf of the mother’s child, that this section violates equal protection, because the partner had no legally recognized or protected relationship with the child. Doe v. Doe, 162 Idaho 254, 395 P.3d 1287 (2017).

Unmarried Couple.

Mother’s partner could not, under this section, claim parentage of the mother’s child by virtue of having consented to the mother’s artificial insemination, as this section does not address the conception of a child through artificial insemination by an unmarried couple. Doe v. Doe, 162 Idaho 254, 395 P.3d 1287 (2017).

§ 39-5406. Application of act.

Except as may be otherwise provided by a judicial decree entered in any action filed before the effective date of this act, the provisions of this act apply to all persons conceived as a result of artificial insemination as defined herein.

History.

1982, ch. 349, § 6, p. 862.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1982, ch. 349, which is compiled as§§ 39-5401 to 39-5407.

The phrase “the effective date of this act” refers to the effective date of S.L. 1982, ch. 349, which was July 1, 1982.

Effective Dates.

Section 8 of S.L. 1982, ch. 349 read: “The provisions of this act shall be effective on July 1, 1982, except subsections (2), (3) and (4) of section 3 [§ 39-5403] which shall take effect on July 1, 1983.”

§ 39-5407. Penalty.

A person who violates the provisions of sections 2 [39-5402, Idaho Code], 3 [39-5403, Idaho Code], or 4 [39-5404, Idaho Code], of this act is guilty of a misdemeanor.

History.

1982, ch. 349, § 7, p. 862.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertions were added by the compiler to conform to the statutory citation style.

Effective Dates.

Section 8 of S.L. 1982, ch. 349 read: “The provisions of this act shall be effective on July 1, 1982, except subsections (2), (3) and (4) of section 3 [§ 39-5403] which shall take effect on July 1, 1983.”

§ 39-5408. HTLV-III antibody.

Every hospital, bank or other storage facility where a person has donated semen shall use all reasonable means to detect if the donor has an antibody to HTLV-III in his blood. In the event that an antibody to HTLV-III is detected, such semen shall not be used for any purposes of artificial insemination.

As used in this section, “HTLV-III” means the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5408, as added by 1986, ch. 111, § 1, p. 304.

Chapter 55 CLEAN INDOOR AIR

Sec.

§ 39-5501. Legislative findings and intent.

  1. Public health officials have concluded that secondhand tobacco smoke causes disease, including lung cancer and heart disease, in nonsmoking adults, as well as causes serious conditions in children such as asthma, respiratory infections, middle ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. In addition, public health officials have concluded that secondhand smoke can exacerbate adult asthma and allergies and cause eye, throat and nasal irritation. The conclusions of public health officials concerning secondhand tobacco smoke are sufficient to warrant measures that regulate smoking in public places in order to protect the public health and the health of employees who work at public places.
  2. The intent of this chapter is to protect the public health, comfort and environment, the health of employees who work at public places and the rights of nonsmokers to breathe clean air by prohibiting smoking in public places and at public meetings.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5501, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119; am. 2004, ch. 389, § 1, p. 1166.

§ 39-5502. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Auditorium” means a public building where an audience sits and any corridors, hallways or lobbies adjacent thereto.
  2. “Bar” means any indoor area open to the public operated primarily for the sale and service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption and where: (a) the service of food is incidental to the consumption of such beverages, or (b) no person under the age of twenty-one (21) years is permitted except as provided in section 23-943, Idaho Code, as it pertains to employees, musicians and singers, and all public entrances are clearly posted with signs warning patrons that it is a smoking facility and that persons under twenty-one (21) years of age are not permitted. “Bar” does not include any area within a restaurant.
  3. “Employer” means any person, partnership, limited liability company, association, corporation or nonprofit entity that employs one (1) or more persons, including the legislative, executive and judicial branches of state government; any county, city, or any other political subdivision of the state; or any other separate unit of state or local government.
  4. “Indoor shopping mall” means an indoor facility located at least fifty (50) feet from any public street or highway and housing no less than ten (10) retail establishments.
  5. “Public meeting” means all meetings open to the public.
  6. “Public place” means any enclosed indoor place of business, commerce, banking, financial service or other service-related activity, whether publicly or privately owned and whether operated for profit or not, to which persons not employed at the public place have general and regular access or which the public uses including:
    1. Buildings, offices, shops or restrooms;
    2. Waiting rooms for means of transportation or common carriers;
    3. Restaurants;
    4. Theaters, auditoriums, museums or art galleries;
    5. Hospitals, libraries, indoor shopping malls, indoor sports arenas, concert halls, or airport passenger terminals, and within twenty (20) feet of public entrances and exits to such facilities;
    6. Public or private elementary or secondary school buildings and educational facilities and within twenty (20) feet of entrances and exits of such buildings or facilities;
    7. Retail stores, grocery stores or arcades;
    8. Barbershops, hair salons or laundromats;
    9. Sports or fitness facilities;
    10. Common areas of nursing homes, resorts, hotels, motels, bed and breakfast lodging facilities and other similar lodging facilities, including lobbies, hallways, restaurants and other designated dining areas and restrooms of any of these;
    11. Any child care facility subject to licensure under the laws of Idaho, including those operated in private homes, when any child cared for under that license is present;
    12. Public means of mass transportation including vans, trains, taxicabs and limousines when passengers are present; and
    13. Any public place not exempted by section 39-5503, Idaho Code.
  7. “Publicly-owned building or office” means any enclosed indoor place or portion of a place owned, leased or rented by any state, county or municipal government, or by any agency supported by appropriation of, or by contracts or grants from, funds derived from the collection of federal, state, municipal or county taxes.
  8. “Restaurant” means an eating establishment including, but not limited to, coffee shops, cafes, cafeterias, and private and public school cafeterias, which gives or offers for sale food to the public, guests, or employees, as well as kitchens and catering facilities in which food is prepared on the premises for serving elsewhere. The term “restaurant” shall include a bar area within a restaurant.
  9. “Smoking” includes the possession of any lighted tobacco product in any form.
  10. “Smoking area” means a designated area in which smoking is permitted.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5502, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119; am. 2004, ch. 389, § 2, p. 1166.

§ 39-5503. Prohibitions — Exceptions.

  1. No person shall smoke in a public place, publicly-owned building or office, or at a public meeting, except in the following which may contain smoking areas or be designated as smoking areas in their entirety:
    1. Bars;
    2. Retail businesses primarily engaged in the sale of tobacco or tobacco products;
    3. Buildings owned and operated by social, fraternal, or religious organizations when used by the membership of the organization, their guests or families, or any facility that is rented or leased for private functions from which the public is excluded and for which arrangements are under the control of the sponsor of the function;
    4. Guest rooms in hotels, motels, bed and breakfast lodging facilities, and other similar lodging facilities, designated by the person or persons having management authority over such public lodging establishment as rooms in which smoking may be permitted;
    5. Theatrical production sites, if smoking is an integral part of the story in the theatrical production;
    6. Areas of owner-operated businesses, with no employees other than the owner-operators, that are not commonly open to the public;
    7. Any office or business, other than child care facilities, located within the proprietor’s private home when all such offices and/or businesses occupy less than fifty percent (50%) of the total area within the private home;
    8. Idaho state veterans homes, established pursuant to section 66-901, Idaho Code, that permit smoking in designated areas, provided that physical barriers and ventilation systems are used to reduce smoke in adjacent nonsmoking areas; and
    9. A designated employee breakroom established by a small business owner employing five (5) or fewer employees, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
      1. The breakroom is not accessible to minors;
      2. The breakroom is separated from other parts of the building by a floor to ceiling partition;
      3. The breakroom is not the sole means of entrance or exit to the establishment or its restrooms and is located in an area where no employee is required to enter as part of the employee’s work responsibilities. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “work responsibilities” does not include custodial or maintenance work performed in a breakroom when it is unoccupied; and
      4. “Warning: Smoking Permitted” signs are prominently posted in the smoking breakroom and properly maintained by the employer. The letters on such signs shall be at least one (1) inch in height.
  2. This section shall not be construed to require employers to provide reasonable accommodation to smokers, or to provide breakrooms for smokers or nonsmokers.
  3. Nothing in this section shall prohibit an employer from prohibiting smoking in an enclosed place of employment.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5503, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119; am. 2004, ch. 389, § 3, p. 1166; am. 2005, ch. 96, § 1, p. 315; am. 2007, ch. 272, § 1, p. 799.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 272, deleted former paragraph (1)(c), which read: “Bowling alleys,” and made related redesignations.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2005, ch. 96 declared an emergency. Approved March 21, 2005.

§ 39-5504. Designated smoking areas. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5504, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119, was repealed by S.L. 2004, ch. 389, § 4.

§ 39-5505. Smoking in elevators prohibited.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or any other statute, or county or city ordinance, no person shall smoke in any elevator generally accessible to the public. Signs indicating that smoking is prohibited shall be conspicuously posted in each elevator and at each entrance to an elevator car or bank of elevators.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5505, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119.

§ 39-5506. Responsibilities of employers.

  1. No employer or other person in charge of a public place or publicly-owned building or office shall knowingly or intentionally permit the smoking of tobacco products in violation of this chapter.
  2. Any employer or other person in charge of a public place or publicly-owned building or office who knowingly violates the provisions of this section is guilty of an infraction and is subject to a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100).
  3. Any employer who discharges or in any manner discriminates against an employee because that employee has made a complaint or has given information to the department of health and welfare or the department of labor pursuant to this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5506, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119; am. 2004, ch. 389, § 5, p. 1166.

§ 39-5507. Violations.

An employer, or other person in charge of a public place or publicly owned building, or the agent or employee of such person, who observes a person smoking in apparent violation of this chapter shall ask the person to extinguish all lighted tobacco products. If the person persists in violating this chapter, the employer, person in charge, agent or employee shall ask the person to leave the premises. Any person who refuses to either extinguish all lighted tobacco products or leave the premises is guilty of an infraction and is subject to a fine of seventeen dollars and fifty cents ($17.50). Any violation may be reported to a law enforcement officer.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5507, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119; am. 2004, ch. 389, § 6, p. 1166; am. 2015, ch. 198, § 3, p. 608.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 198, substituted “fine of seventeen dollars and fifty cents ($17.50)” for “fine not to exceed fifty dollars ($50.00)” at the end of the third sentence.

§ 39-5508. Rules and regulations.

The director of the Idaho department of health and welfare shall adopt rules and regulations necessary, reasonable and consistent with the intent of this chapter to implement the provisions of this chapter. The director may, upon request, waive the provisions of said rules and regulations if it is determined that there are compelling reasons to do so and a waiver will not significantly affect the health and comfort of nonsmokers.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5508, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of health and welfare,§ 56-1002.

§ 39-5509. Other statutes not affected.

The provisions of this chapter shall not be deemed to amend, modify or repeal sections 18-5904, 18-5905 and 18-5906, Idaho Code, relating to no smoking during public meetings.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5509, as added by 1985, ch. 60, § 1, p. 119.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1985, ch. 60 provided that the act should take effect on and after January 1, 1986.

§ 39-5510. Smoking on buses.

  1. Smoking of tobacco or other products in or upon any bus, except a charter bus, is a violation of the provisions of this chapter, and any person smoking tobacco or other products on a bus, except a charter bus shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be punished as provided in section 39-5507, Idaho Code.
  2. As used in this section:
    1. “Bus” means any passenger bus or coach or other motor vehicle having a seating capacity of fifteen (15) or more passengers operated by a bus company for the purpose of carrying passengers or cargo for hire.
    2. “Bus company” means any person, group of persons, association, partnership, corporation or other recognized legal entity providing for-hire transportation to passengers or cargo by bus upon the highways in the state, including passengers and cargo in interstate or intrastate travel. These terms also include cities, counties, districts, public corporations, boards and commissions established under the laws of this state providing transportation to passengers or cargo by bus upon the highways in the state, whether or not for hire.
    3. “Charter” means a group of persons, pursuant to a common purpose and under a single contract, and at a fixed charge in accordance with a bus company’s tariff, which has acquired the exclusive use of a bus to travel together to a specified destination or destinations, or special excursions to one (1) specific destination.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5510, as added by 1987, ch. 183, § 1, p. 362.

§ 39-5511. Local provisions.

Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to prevent local, county or municipal governments from adopting ordinances or regulations more restrictive than the provisions contained herein.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5511, as added by 2004, ch. 389, § 7, p. 1166.

Chapter 56 PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES

Sec.

§ 39-5601. Legislative intent.

The purpose and intent of this chapter is to authorize personal assistance services for medicaid eligible participants in the participant’s home and community. It is further the purpose of this chapter to help maintain these eligible participants in their own homes in order to provide for the greatest degree of independence and self-reliance possible.

Personal assistance services are an integral component of the long-term care service delivery system and they are to be designed to provide a range of services for persons who are elderly, for persons with disabilities and for children who meet medical necessity criteria for personal care services (PCS). These services are to help individuals compensate for functional limitations and are to be delivered over a sustained period of time to persons who lost or never acquired some degree of functional capacity. Services will be viewed as enhancing the quality of life, individual choice, consumer control, independence and community integration.

Personal assistance services related to functional need shall be provided in order to maintain the independence, privacy, and dignity of the individual in the least restrictive, most cost-effective setting.

The participant and, at the option of the participant, the family of the participant, if available, shall be involved in the development of the individual service plan based on the participant’s needs identified through an assessment conducted by the department.

History.

I.C., § 39-A4701, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 1, p. 888; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 122, p. 799; am. 2010, ch. 347, § 1, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 347, added “and for children who meet medical necessity criteria for personal care services (PCS)” in the first sentence in the second paragraph.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4701.

The letters “PCS” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-5602. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

  1. “Department” means the department of health and welfare of the state of Idaho.
  2. “Director” means the director of the department of health and welfare.
  3. “Eligible participant” or “participant” means an individual determined eligible by the department for Idaho medicaid services, as authorized by title XIX, of the social security act, as amended.
  4. “Fiscal intermediary agency” means an entity that provides services that allow the participant receiving personal assistance services, or his designee or legal representative, to choose the level of control he will assume in recruiting, selecting, managing, training and dismissing his personal assistant and over the manner in which services are delivered.
  5. “Individual service plan” means a document which outlines all services including, but not limited to, personal assistance services and IADLs, required to maintain the individual in his or her home and community.
  6. “Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)” means those activities performed in supporting the activities of daily living for an adult, including, but not limited to: managing money, preparing meals, shopping, light housekeeping, using the telephone, or getting around in the community.
  7. “PCS family alternate care provider” means an individual licensed by the department to provide personal care services to one (1) or two (2) children who are unable to reside in their own home and require assistance with medically oriented tasks related to the child’s physical or functional needs.
  8. “Personal assistance agency” means an entity that recruits, hires, fires, trains, supervises, schedules, oversees quality of work, takes responsibility for services provided, provides payroll and benefits for personal assistants working for them, is the employer of record and in fact.
  9. “Personal assistance services” includes both attendant care services and personal care services and means services that involve personal and medically oriented tasks dealing with the functional needs of the participant and accommodating the participant’s needs for long-term maintenance, supportive care or IADLs. These services may include, but are not limited to, personal assistance and medical tasks that can be done by unlicensed persons or delegated to unlicensed persons by a health care professional or participant. Services shall be based on the participant’s abilities and limitations, medical diagnosis or other category of disability.
  10. “Personal assistant” means an individual who directly provides personal assistance services.
  11. “Personal care services (PCS)” means a range of medically oriented care services related to a participant’s physical or functional requirements. These services are provided in the participant’s home or personal residence but do not include housekeeping or skilled nursing care.
  12. “Provider” means a personal assistance agency, a fiscal intermediary agency or a PCS family alternate care provider.
  13. “Representative” means an employee of the department of health and welfare.
  14. “Service coordination” means a case management activity that assists individuals eligible for medicaid in gaining and coordinating access to necessary care and services appropriate to the needs of the individual. Service coordination is a brokerage model of case management. (15) “Voucher service option” means a method of service provision whereby the participant receives vouchers to pay for personal assistance services.
History.

I.C., § 39-A4702, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 2, p. 888; am. 1997, ch. 316, § 1, p. 933; am. 1998, ch. 224, § 1, p. 770; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 123, p. 799; am. 2007, ch. 222, § 2, p. 665; am. 2010, ch. 347, § 2, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 222, deleted former subsections (1) and (12), which were the definitions for “Attendant care” and “Personal care services,” respectively, and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in subsection (5), substituted “agency” for “services,” inserted “an entity that provides,” and deleted “regardless of who the employer of record is, and allows the participant control over the manner in which services are delivered” from the end; in subsection (8), deleted “and may provide fiscal intermediary services” from the end; in subsection (9), in the first sentence, substituted “includes both attendant care services” for “includes attendant care,” and added the language beginning “and means services that involve personal and medically oriented tasks,” and added the last sentence; and in subsection (11), inserted “or a fiscal intermediary agency.”

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 347, deleted subsection (1), which was the definition for “case management,” added subsections (7), (11), and (14) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in subsection (4), added “and over the manner in which services are delivered”; in subsection (6), inserted “for an adult”; in the last sentence in subsection (9), deleted “regardless of age” following “limitations”; and in subsection (12), added “or a PCS family alternate care provider.”

Federal References.

Title XIX of the Social Security Act, referred to in subdivision (3), is compiled as 42 USCS § 1396 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4702.

The letters “IADL” and “PCS” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-5603. Standards for provision of personal assistance services.

The director shall have the power and it shall be his duty to promulgate and adopt appropriate rules necessary to implement and enforce standards for provision of personal assistance services.

The following standards for provision of personal assistance services and other provisions contained throughout this chapter and rules shall apply to participants and providers receiving or providing personal assistance services either as a medicaid option service or a waivered service, unless prohibited by federal law or contents of the federal waiver agreement.

  1. Personal care services shall be included in the medicaid services described in section 56-255(3) and (4), Idaho Code.
  2. Attendant care shall be included as a service under medicaid home and community-based waiver(s).
  3. All attendant care services must be authorized by the department or its designee.
  4. The department will establish by rule maximum hours per month of personal care services available to the individual participant under the state medicaid plan.
  5. The department shall enter into agreements with providers for the provision of personal assistance services. A single provider may operate as both a personal assistance agency and a fiscal intermediary agency. However, the agency must clearly document whether it is operating as a personal assistance agency or as a fiscal intermediary for each participant. The department may deny provider status or revoke that status when a provider is found to endanger the health, person or property of the participant, or is in violation of rules promulgated by the department or the provider agreement.
  6. A personal assistance agency shall have the responsibility for the following:
    1. Recruitment, hiring, firing, training, supervision, scheduling, payroll, and the assurance of quality of service, of its personal assistants;
    2. Complying with state and federal labor and tax laws, rules and regulations;
    3. Maintaining liability insurance coverage;
    4. Provision of an appropriately qualified nurse when required;
    5. Assignment of a qualified personal assistant to each authorized participant after consultation with and prior approval of that participant;
    6. Assuring all personal assistants providing services meet the standards and qualifications of this chapter;
    7. Billing medicaid for services approved and authorized;
    8. Collecting any participant contribution due;
    9. Referring participants to the department for service coordination services based on established criteria;
    10. Providing for care by a qualified replacement when the regular personal assistant is unable to provide the services, and providing for unanticipated services approved on the individual service plan when requested by the participant; and
    11. Conducting, at least annually, participant satisfaction/quality control reviews available to the department and general public.
  7. A fiscal intermediary agency shall have the responsibility for the following:
    1. To assure compliance with legal requirements related to the employment of participant/family directed personal assistants;
    2. To offer services to enable participants or families to perform required employer tasks themselves;
    3. To bill the medicaid program for services approved and authorized by the department;
    4. To collect any participant contribution due;
    5. To pay personal assistants for services;
    6. To perform all necessary withholding as required by state and federal labor and tax laws, rules and regulations;
    7. To assure that all personal assistants providing services meet the standards and qualifications of this chapter;
    8. To refer participants to service coordination services based on established criteria;
    9. To maintain liability insurance coverage;
    10. To conduct, at least annually, participant satisfaction and quality control reviews which shall be available to the department and to the general public; and
    11. To maintain documentation that the participant or his legal representative agrees in writing that he takes responsibility for and accepts potential risks, and any resulting consequences, for his choice to manage his own personal assistance services.
  8. Personal assistants are not employees of the state.
  9. Service coordination shall be made available to personal assistance participants where and when appropriate. In order to avoid a conflict of interest, service coordination shall not be provided by the same agency that provides personal assistance services to the participant.
  10. The department’s regional medicaid staff shall review and approve the individual service plan, authorize personal assistance services, the hours of service, and make appropriate referrals for service coordination for eligible individuals.
  11. The department shall establish and maintain a community awareness program that will educate Idaho citizens regarding the purpose and function of all long-term care alternatives including, but not limited to, personal assistance services and individual participant rights. This program will be developed in cooperation with other state agencies including, but not limited to, the commission on aging and the state independent living council.
  12. It shall be the responsibility of the participant or his designee or legal representative, when appropriate, to select the provider of personal assistance services.
  13. The department shall provide the participant, his designee or legal representative, with a list of available providers of personal assistance services; however, this does not relieve the participant or his designee or legal representative of the responsibility of provider selection.
  14. In those cases where the participant or his designee or legal representative cannot arrange for personal assistance services or asks for help in making arrangements, a representative of the department may arrange for or help arrange for personal assistance services on behalf of the participant.
History.

I.C., § 39-A4703, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 3, p. 888; am. 1997, ch. 316, § 2, p. 933; am. 1998, ch. 224, § 2, p. 770; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 124, p. 799; am. 2006, ch. 283, § 1, p. 869; am. 2007, ch. 222, § 3, p. 665; am. 2010, ch. 347, § 3, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Commission on aging,§ 67-5001 et seq.

State independent living council,§ 56-1201 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 283, deleted former subsection (2), which read: “Personal care services shall be ordered by a physician or authorized provider,” and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 222, rewrote subsection (1), which formerly read: “Personal care services shall be included as a state plan service under medicaid”: added the second sentence in subsection (5); in the introductory language in subsection (6), substituted “personal assistance agency” for “provider agency”; added paragraph (6)(h) and made related redesignations; in paragraph (6)(i), inserted “the department for”; in the introductory language in subsection (7), deleted “personal assistance agency that provides” preceding “fiscal,” and substituted “agency” for “services”; in paragraph (7)(b), deleted “supportive” preceding “services”; rewrote paragraph (7)(g), which formerly read: “To offer a full range of services and perform all services contained in a written agreement between the participant and the provider”; and added paragraphs (7)(h) through (7)(k).

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 347, throughout subsections (6) through (10), substituted “service coordination” for “case management.”

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4703.

§ 39-5604. Health and background checks.

The director shall require providers to obtain health tests or screens, criminal background and nurse’s aide registry checks, and licenses and/or certifications necessary to protect the health, person and property of the participant for any personal assistant acting as an employee, agent, or contractor of a provider. He may deny provider status or revoke that status when a provider or an employee, agent, or contractor of a provider, is found to endanger the health, person or property of the participant.

History.

I.C., § 39-A4704, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 4, p. 888; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 125, p. 799.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4704.

§ 39-5605. Training of personal assistants.

The director may require a personal assistant to successfully complete a training program established by the rules before beginning to provide personal assistance services. Those providing personal assistance services when the rule is established will be given a reasonable period of time to obtain the required training. The director may establish different training requirements for different services provided and for personal assistants serving participants with intensive needs. The department shall conduct training to include, but not be limited to, administrative rules, billing procedures and service requirements.

History.

I.C., § 39-A4705, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 5, p. 888; am. 1997, ch. 316, § 3, p. 933; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 126, p. 799.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4705.

§ 39-5606. Payment to be made to provider. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2011, ch. 164, § 1, effective July 1, 2011.

History.

I.C., § 39-A4706, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 6, p. 888; am. 1997, ch. 316, § 4, p. 933; am. 1998, ch. 224, § 3, p. 770; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 127, p. 799; am. 2010, ch. 296, § 1, p. 801; am. 2010, ch. 347, § 4, p. 905; am. 2011, ch. 148, § 1, p. 412; am. 2011, ch. 151, § 20, p. 414.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as § 39-A4706.

S.L. 2011, ch. 148, § 1 and S.L. 2011, ch. 151, § 20 both purported to amend this section; however, S.L. 2011, ch. 164, § 1 repealed this section, effective July 1, 2011.

§ 39-5607. Effect of personal assistance agency rates. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5607, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5607, as added by 1997, ch. 316, § 5, p. 933, was repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 224, § 4, effective July 1, 1998.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5607, as added by 2000, ch. 274, § 128, p. 799, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 222, § 4.

§ 39-5608. Liability of actions under this chapter.

  1. The participant, his designee or legal representative, if such is responsible, shall be liable for any acts of the participant performed or committed while receiving care or services under the provisions of this chapter.
  2. The department shall not be held liable for any actions under this chapter, except pursuant to section39-5603(13) [39-5603(12)], Idaho Code, when the representative of the department is acting on behalf of the participant, his designee or legal representative; however, the provisions of section39-5603(11) [39-5603(10)], Idaho Code, shall remain in force.
  3. Nothing in this chapter shall exempt the provider of services from any liability caused by such provider’s negligence, abuse, or other improper action of the provider.
History.

I.C., § 39-A4707, as added by 1981, ch. 65, § 1, p. 93; am. and redesig. 1990, ch. 326, § 7, p. 888; am. and redesig. 1997, ch. 316, § 6, p. 933; am. 2000, ch. 274, § 129, p. 799; am. 2006, ch. 283, § 2, p. 869.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 283, updated the section references in subsection (2).

Legislative Intent.

Section 7 of S.L. 1997, ch. 316 read: “It is the intent of the Legislature that the Department of Health and Welfare shall convene a committee consisting of providers of personal care services and recipients of such services and organizations representing such recipients, and other interested parties, for the purpose of planning the implementation of changes to the Medicaid waiver and Personal Care Services Program required by this act. At least one-half of the membership of the committee shall be recipients and their representatives.”

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-5607 and as § 39-A4707.

The bracketed insertions were added in this section by the compiler to supply the probable intended statutory references.

Effective Dates.

Section 8 of S.L. 1997, ch. 316 declared an emergency and provided that the act should be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 1997. Approved March 24, 1997.

§ 39-5609. Personal assistance oversight committee.

The department shall establish, as part of the medical care advisory committee (MCAC), an oversight subcommittee consisting of providers of personal assistance services and participants of such services and advocacy organizations representing such participants, and other interested parties, for the purpose of planning, monitoring, and recommending changes to the medicaid waiver and personal assistance programs to the MCAC. At least fifty-one percent (51%) of the committee membership shall be participants or their representatives.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5609, as added by 2000, ch. 274, § 130, p. 799; am. 2007, ch. 222, § 5, p. 665.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 222, deleted the former last sentence, which read: “The director shall determine when and if this role shall be performed by the MCAC.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The medical care advisory committee advises Idaho medicaid in the development and refinement of the medicaid program. See:

http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov / medical / medicaid / medicalcareadvisory committee/tabid/1206/default.aspx .

The letters “MCAC” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Chapter 57 PREVENTION OF MINORS’ ACCESS TO TOBACCO PRODUCTS OR ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES

Sec.

§ 39-5701. Legislative findings and intent.

The prevention of youth access to tobacco products and electronic smoking devices within the state of Idaho is hereby declared to be a state goal to promote the general health and welfare of Idaho’s young people.

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Idaho, and nicotine is a highly addictive, potentially harmful substance. Both present an urgent public health challenge. New and emerging tobacco products and electronic nicotine delivery devices like electronic cigarettes are linked to an increase in youth use of tobacco and nicotine products, are connected to the use of traditional tobacco products like cigarettes, and are associated with increased addiction in youth users. Therefore, it is this state’s policy to prevent the illegal sale, theft, and easy access of tobacco products and electronic smoking devices to minors, to prohibit the possession, distribution, and use of tobacco products and electronic smoking devices by minors, and to otherwise discourage and prevent the possession, use, and trafficking in tobacco products and electronic smoking devices by minors.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5701, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 1, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 39-5701 to 39-5708 which comprised: I.C.,§§ 39-5701 to 39-5708, as added by 1997, ch. 278, § 1, p. 824 was repealed by S.L. 1998, ch. 418, § 1, effective January 1, 1999.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Compiler’s Notes.

S.L. 1998, ch. 418, which repealed the prior version of this chapter, effective January 1, 1999, provides in § 3: “The Department of Health and Welfare is hereby authorized to begin rule promulgation and undertake other necessary tasks to administer the provisions of this act prior to January 1, 1999.”

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5702. Definitions.

The terms used in this chapter are defined as follows:

  1. “Business” means any company, partnership, firm, sole proprietorship, association, corporation, organization, or other legal entity, or a representative of the foregoing entities.
  2. “Delivery sale” means to distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices to a consumer in a state where either:
    1. The individual submits the order for such sale by means of a telephonic or other method of voice transmission, data transfer via computer networks, including the internet and other online services, or facsimile, or the mails; or
    2. The tobacco products or electronic smoking devices are delivered by use of the mails or a delivery service.
  3. “Delivery service” means any person who is engaged in the commercial delivery of letters, packages or other containers.
  4. “Department” means the state department of health and welfare or its duly authorized representative.
  5. “Distribute” means to give, deliver, sell, offer to give, offer to deliver, offer to sell or cause any person to do the same or hire any person to do the same.
  6. “Minor” means a person under eighteen (18) years of age.
  7. “Minor exempt permit” means a permittee location whose revenues from the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption comprises at least fifty-five percent (55%) of total revenues, or whose products and services are primarily obscene, pornographic, profane, or sexually oriented, is exempt from inspections assisted by a minor, if minors are not allowed in the location and such prohibition is posted clearly on all entrance doors.
  8. “Permit” means a permit issued by the department for the sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.
  9. “Permittee” means the holder of a valid permit for the sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.
  10. “Photographic identification” means state, district, territorial, possession, provincial, national or other equivalent government driver’s license, identification card or military card, in all cases bearing a photograph and a date of birth, or a valid passport.
  11. “Random unannounced inspection” means an inspection of retail outlets by a law enforcement agency or by the department, with or without the assistance of a minor, to monitor compliance of this chapter.
  12. “Seller” means the person who physically sells or distributes tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.
    1. “Tobacco product or electronic smoking device” means: (13)(a) “Tobacco product or electronic smoking device” means:
      1. Any substance containing, made of, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption or is likely to be consumed, whether inhaled, absorbed, or ingested by any other means, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, snuff, smoking or chewing tobacco, snus, tobacco papers, or smokeless tobacco;
      2. Any electronic smoking device that may be used to deliver an aerosolized or a vaporized substance to the person inhaling from the device, including but not limited to an electronic cigarette, an electronic cigar, an electronic pipe, a vape pen, or an electronic hookah, or any component, part, or accessory of such a device, or any substance intended to be aerosolized or vaporized during use of the device, whether or not the substance contains nicotine, or any heated or lighted device intended to be used for inhalation; or (iii) Any components, parts, or accessories of a tobacco product or an electronic smoking device, whether or not they contain tobacco or nicotine, including but not limited to filters, rolling papers, blunt or hemp wraps, and pipes, whether manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an electronic cigarette, electronic cigar, electronic hookah, or vape pen, or under any other product name or descriptor.
    2. The term “tobacco product or electronic smoking device” does not include drugs, devices, or combinations of products authorized for sale by the United States food and drug administration as those terms are defined in the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act.
  13. “Vending machine” means any mechanical, electronic, or other similar device which, upon the insertion of tokens, money or any other form of payment, dispenses tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.
  14. “Vendor-assisted sales” means any sale or distribution in which the customer has no access to the product except through the assistance of the seller.
  15. “Without a permit” means a business that has failed to obtain a permit or a business whose permit is suspended or revoked.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5702, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2003, ch. 159, § 1, p. 449; am. 2003, ch. 273, § 1, p. 728; am. 2004, ch. 318, § 5, p. 892; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 1, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 2, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5702 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2003 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2003 amendment, by ch. 159, inserted present subsection (7).

The 2003 amendment, by ch. 273, inserted subsections (2) and (3), and renumbered the subsequent subsections accordingly.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, added subsection (6) and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly and inserted “or electronic cigarettes” twice in subsection (2) and at the ends of subsections (13) and (15).

Effective Dates.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “electronic smoking devices” for “electronic cigarettes” throughout; deleted former subsection (6), which read: “Electronic cigarette’ means any device that can provide an inhaled dose of nicotine by delivering a vaporized solution. ‘Electronic cigarette’ includes the components of an electronic cigarette including, but not limited to, liquid nicotine” redesignated former subsections (7) to (17) as present subsections (6) to (16); added “or electronic smoking devices” at the ends of subsections (8) and (9); and rewrote former subsection (14) now (13), which read: “Tobacco product’ means any substance that contains tobacco including, but not limited to, cigarettes, cigars, pipes, snuff, smoking tobacco, tobacco papers or smokeless tobacco. Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

Section 14 of S.L. 2004, ch. 318 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 2004.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

§ 39-5703. Possession, distribution, or use by a minor.

  1. It shall be unlawful for a minor to possess, receive, purchase, use, or consume tobacco products or electronic smoking devices or to attempt any of the foregoing.
  2. It shall be unlawful for a minor to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices or to attempt either of the foregoing.
  3. It shall be unlawful for a minor to provide false identification or make any false statement regarding their age in an attempt to obtain tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.
  4. A minor who is assisting with a random unannounced inspection in accordance with this chapter shall not be in violation of this chapter.
  5. A minor may possess but not sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in the course of employment, for duties such as stocking shelves or carrying purchases to customers’ vehicles.
  6. Penalties for violations by a minor. A violation of subsection (1) of this section by a minor shall constitute an infraction and shall be punishable by a fine of seventeen dollars and fifty cents ($17.50). The first violation of subsection (2) or (3) of this section by a minor shall constitute an infraction and shall be punishable by a fine of two hundred dollars ($200). A subsequent violation of subsection (2) or (3) of this section by a minor shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by imprisonment in an appropriate facility not exceeding thirty (30) days, a fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300), or both such fine and imprisonment. The court may, in addition to the penalties provided in this section, require the minor and the minor’s parents or legal guardian to attend tobacco product or electronic smoking device awareness programs or to perform community service in programs related to tobacco product or electronic smoking device awareness.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5703, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 2, p. 118; am. 2015, ch. 158, § 1, p. 553; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 3, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5703 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “or electronic cigarettes” in subsections (1), (2) and (4).

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 158, deleted “sell, distribute” following “receive, purchase” in subsection (1); added subsection (2) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; and, in subsection (6), added the second and third sentences, and substituted “A subsequent violation of subsection (2) or (3) of this section” for “A violation of this chapter” and “thirty (30) days” for “six (6) months” in the fourth sentence. The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “electronic smoking devices” for “electric cigarettes” throughout; and rewrote the last sentence in subsection (6), which formerly read: “The court may, in addition to the penalties provided herein, require the minor and the minor’s parents or legal guardian to attend tobacco awareness programs or to perform community service in programs related to tobacco awareness.”

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Doe (In re Doe), 145 Idaho 980, 188 P.3d 922 (Ct. App. 2008).

§ 39-5704. Permitting of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices retailers.

  1. It shall be unlawful to sell or distribute or offer tobacco products or electronic smoking devices for sale or distribution at retail or to possess tobacco products or electronic smoking devices with the intention of selling at retail without having first obtained a tobacco product or electronic smoking device permit from the department, which shall be the only retail tobacco product or electronic smoking device permit or license required. Provided however, this section shall not be deemed to require a wholesaler or manufacturer’s representative or employees who, in the course of their employment, stock shelves and replenish tobacco products or electronic smoking devices at a permittee’s place of business to obtain a permit.
  2. The department shall administer the permitting of tobacco product or electronic smoking device retailers and shall be authorized to ensure compliance with this chapter. The department may promulgate rules in compliance with chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, regarding permitting of tobacco product or electronic smoking device retailers, inspections, and compliance checks, effective training, and employment practices under this chapter.
  3. Permits shall be issued annually for each business location to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter. A copy of this chapter, rules adopted by the department, appropriate signage required by this chapter, and any materials deemed necessary shall be provided with each permit issued.
  4. A separate permit must be obtained for each place of business and is nontransferable to another person, business, or location.
  5. Permittees may display the permit in a prominent location.
  6. A permittee may display a sign in each location within a place of business where tobacco products or electronic smoking devices are sold or distributed. A sign may be clearly visible to the customer and the seller and shall state: “STATE LAW PROHIBITS THE SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS OR ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES TO PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS. PROOF OF AGE REQUIRED. ANYONE WHO SELLS OR DISTRIBUTES TOBACCO PRODUCTS OR ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES TO A MINOR IS SUBJECT TO STRICT FINES AND PENALTIES. MINORS ARE SUBJECT TO FINES AND PENALTIES.”
  7. Permittees are responsible to educate employees as to the requirements of this chapter.
  8. It shall be unlawful for the permittee to allow employees who are minors to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices. Exception: Employees who are minors may possess but not sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in the course of employment, for such duties as stocking shelves or carrying purchases to customers’ vehicles.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5704, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 4, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5704 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “products or electronic smoking device retailers” for “product retailers” at the end of the section heading; inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” and inserted “products or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco” throughout the section; and deleted “for no charge” near the beginning of the first sentence in subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

CASE NOTES

Commerce Clause.

The legislature passed the prevention of minors’ access to tobacco act in an effort to prevent minors from accessing tobacco products, in part by regulating who is authorized to sell tobacco. This section is concerned with the introduction of any tobacco products into Idaho by anyone not first obtaining a tobacco permit; the act is a non-discriminatory statute regulating the off-reservation conduct of a Native American. State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109, cert. denied, 562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 150, 178 L. Ed. 2d 37 (2010).

§ 39-5705. Sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices to a minor.

  1. It shall be unlawful to sell, distribute, or offer tobacco products or electronic smoking devices to a minor.
  2. It shall be an affirmative defense that the seller of a tobacco product or an electronic smoking device to a minor in violation of this section had requested, examined, and reasonably relied upon a photographic identification from such person establishing that the person is at least eighteen (18) years of age prior to selling such person a tobacco product or an electronic smoking device. The failure of a seller to request and examine photographic identification from a person under eighteen (18) years of age prior to the sale of a tobacco product or an electronic smoking device to such person shall be construed against the seller and form a conclusive basis for the seller’s violation of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5705, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2001, ch. 39, § 1, p. 74; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 3, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 5, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5705 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “and electronic cigarettes” in the section heading, inserted “or electronic cigarettes” in subsection (1), and inserted “or an electronic cigarette” three times in subsection (2).

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “products or electronic smoking devices” for “products and electronic cigarettes” in the section heading and substituted “electronic smoking device” for “electronic cigarette” and “electronic smoking devices” for “electronic cigarettes” throughout the section.

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

Section 4 of S.L. 2001, ch. 39 declared an emergency retroactively to January 1, 2001 and approved March 8, 2001.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

§ 39-5706. Vendor-assisted sales.

  1. It shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices by any means other than vendor-assisted sales where the customer has no access to the product except through the assistance of the seller.
  2. On and after January 1, 2020, it shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices from vending machines or self-service displays.
  3. Stores with tobacco products or electronic smoking devices comprising at least seventy-five percent (75%) of total merchandise are exempt from requiring vendor-assisted sales, if minors are not allowed in the store and such prohibition is posted clearly on all entrance doors.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5706, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 4, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 6, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5706 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “or electronic cigarettes” in subsections (1) and (4); deleted the former second sentence of subsection (2), which read: “From January 1, 1999, to December 31, 1999, vending machines shall be located in a place not accessible to persons under the age of nineteen (19) years”; and added subsection (3), redesignating the subsequent subsections accordingly.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “electronic smoking devices” for “electronic cigarettes” near the beginning of subsection (1); rewrote subsection (2), which formerly read: “On and after January 1, 2000, it shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products from a vending machine”; deleted former subsections (3) and (4), which read: “(3) On and after January 1, 2013, it shall be unlawful to sell or distribute electronic cigarettes from a vending machine. (4) It shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic cigarettes from self-service displays”; redesignated former subsection (5) as present subsection (3); and inserted “or electronic smoking devices” near the beginning of subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5707. Opened packages and samples.

  1. It shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices for commercial purposes other than in the federally required sealed package provided by the manufacturer with all the required warning labels and health warnings.
  2. It shall be unlawful to sell or distribute tobacco products or electronic smoking devices for free or below the cost of such products to the sellers or distributors of the products for commercial or promotional purposes to members of the general public in public places or at public events.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5707, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 7, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5707 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” near the beginning of subsections (1) and (2).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5708. Civil penalties for violations of permit.

  1. Any permittee who fails to comply with any part of this chapter or any current state or local law or rule or regulation regarding the sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices shall be subject to a civil penalty as provided in this section or have their permit suspended, pursuant to compliance with the contested case provisions of the Idaho administrative procedure act, chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, or both.
  2. If a seller who is not a permittee violates section 39-5705, Idaho Code, and sells or distributes tobacco products or electronic smoking devices to a minor, then the seller shall be fined one hundred dollars ($100).
  3. In the case of a first violation, the permittee shall be notified in writing of penalties to be levied for further violations.
  4. In the case of a second violation, the permittee shall be fined two hundred dollars ($200) and shall be notified in writing of penalties to be levied for further violations. For a violation of section 39-5705, Idaho Code, the permittee shall not be fined if the permittee can show that a training program was in place for the employee and that the permittee has a form signed by that employee on file stating that the employee understands the tobacco product or electronic smoking device laws dealing with minors and the unlawful purchase of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices, but the permittee shall be notified in writing of penalties to be levied for any further violations. If no such training is in place, the permittee shall be fined two hundred dollars ($200).
  5. In the case of a third violation in a two (2) year period, the permittee shall be fined two hundred dollars ($200) and the permit may be suspended for up to seven (7) days. If the violation is by an employee, at the same location, who was involved in any previous citation for violation, the permittee shall be fined four hundred dollars ($400). Effective training and employment practices by the permittee, as determined by the department, shall be a mitigating factor in determining permit suspension. Tobacco product or electronic smoking device retailers must remove all tobacco products or electronic smoking devices from all areas accessible to or visible to the public while the permit is suspended.
  6. In the case of four (4) or more violations within a two (2) year period, the permittee shall be fined four hundred dollars ($400) and the permit shall be revoked until such time that the permittee demonstrates an effective training plan to the department, but in no case shall the revocation be for less than thirty (30) days. Tobacco product or electronic smoking device retailers must remove all tobacco products or electronic smoking devices from all areas accessible to or visible to the public while the permit is revoked.
  7. All moneys collected for violations pursuant to this section shall be remitted to the prevention of minors’ access to tobacco products or electronic smoking devices fund created in section 39-5711, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5708, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2001, ch. 39, § 2, p. 74; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 5, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 8, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5708 was repealed. See Prior Laws,§ 39-5701.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “Civil penalty for violations relating to electronic cigarettes” in the section heading; designated the existing introductory paragraph as (1), redesignating the subsequent subsections accordingly; and, in subsection (2), inserted “or electronic cigarettes” and “then.”

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, deleted “Civil penalty for violations relating to electronic cigarettes” from the end of the section heading; inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” and inserted “product or electronic smoking device” or “products or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco” throughout the section; substituted “electronic smoking devices” for “electronic cigarettes” near the middle of subsection (2).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

Section 4 of S.L. 2001, ch. 39 declared an emergency retroactively to January 1, 2001 and approved March 8, 2001.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

§ 39-5709. Criminal penalties for violations without a permit.

Sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices, or any violation of this chapter, without a permit is considered by the state of Idaho as an effort to subvert the state’s public purpose to prevent minor’s access to tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.

  1. The sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices without a permit shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months in the county jail, a fine of three hundred dollars ($300), or by both such fine and imprisonment. If the sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices was to a minor, the fine shall be no less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to an employee of the business engaged in the sale of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices if the sale occurred during the course of such employment and the seller does not have an ownership interest in the business.
  2. In addition to the penalties set forth in subsection (1) of this section, the court may impose an additional fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day beginning the day following the date of citation as long as the illegal tobacco products or electronic smoking devices sales or distribution continues. The first seven (7) days of additional fines may be suspended, provided that the business or seller is able to prove that the business or seller has applied for the permit within seven (7) days of the citation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5709, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 9, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” throughout the section.

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5710. Conduct of enforcement actions.

  1. It is the intent of the legislature that law enforcement agencies, the attorney general, and the department shall enforce this chapter and rules promulgated pursuant thereto in a manner that can reasonably be expected to significantly reduce the extent to which tobacco products and electronic smoking devices are sold or distributed to minors.
  2. Law enforcement agencies may conduct random unannounced inspections at locations where tobacco products or electronic smoking devices are sold or distributed to ensure compliance with this chapter. A copy of all citations issued under this chapter shall be submitted to the department.
  3. The department shall conduct at least one (1) random unannounced inspection per year at all locations where tobacco products or electronic smoking devices are sold or distributed at retail to ensure compliance with this chapter. The department shall conduct inspections for minor exempt permittees without the assistance of a minor. The department shall conduct inspections for all other permittees with the assistance of a minor. Each year, the department shall conduct random unannounced inspections equal to the number of permittees multiplied by the violation percentage rate reported for the previous year multiplied by a factor of ten (10). Local law enforcement agencies are encouraged to contract with the department to perform these required inspections.
  4. Minors may assist with random unannounced inspections with the written consent of a parent or legal guardian. When assisting with these inspections, minors shall not provide false identification nor make any false statement regarding their age.
  5. Citizens may file a written complaint of noncompliance of this chapter with the department, or with a law enforcement agency. Permit holders under 26 U.S.C. 5712 may file written complaints relating to delivery sales to the department or the attorney general’s offices. Complaints shall be investigated and the proper enforcement actions taken.
  6. Within a reasonable time, not later than two (2) business days after an inspection has occurred, a representative of the business inspected shall be informed in writing of the results of the inspection.
  7. The attorney general or his designee, or any person who holds a permit under 26 U.S.C. 5712, may bring an action in district court in Idaho to prevent or restrain violations of this chapter by any person or by any person controlling such person.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5710, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2001, ch. 39, § 3, p. 74; am. 2003, ch. 159, § 2, p. 449; am. 2003, ch. 273, § 2, p. 728; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 6, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 10, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2003 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2003 amendment, by ch. 159, rewrote subsection (3) to allow for the inspection of minor exempt permittees without the assistance of a minor.

The 2003 amendment, by ch. 273, inserted “the attorney general” in subsection (1); inserted the present second sentence in subsection (5); and added subsection (7).

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “and electronic cigarettes” near the end of subsection (1) and inserted “or electronic cigarettes” in the first sentence in subsection (2).

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, substituted “electronic smoking devices” for “electronic cigarettes” near the end of subsection (1) and near the middle of the first sentence in subsection (2); and inserted “or electronic smoking devices” near the middle of the first sentence in subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

Section 4 of S.L. 2001, ch. 39 declared an emergency retroactively to January 1, 2001 and approved March 8, 2001.

§ 39-5711. Funding and creation of prevention of minors’ access to tobacco products or electronic smoking devices fund.

There is hereby created the prevention of minors’ access to tobacco products or electronic smoking devices fund in the state treasury. Moneys in the fund shall be used to fund the administration, inspections and enforcement of this chapter. Moneys in the fund may be expended only pursuant to appropriation. The fund shall consist of:

  1. The current federal funds that are available for inspections or for the prevention of minors’ access to tobacco products or electronic smoking devices shall be utilized by the department;
  2. The fines from the civil penalties pursuant to section 39-5708, Idaho Code; and
  3. Moneys from any other source.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5711, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 11, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, inserted “products or electronic smoking devices” near the end of the section heading, near the end of the first sentence in the introductory paragraph, and near the end of subsection (1).

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5712. Severability.

If any section or provision of this chapter is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other sections or provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5712, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

S.L. 1998, chapter 418, became law without the governor’s signature.

§ 39-5713. Local ordinances.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit local units of government from passing ordinances which are more stringent than the provisions of this chapter. Provided however, local units of government shall not have the power to require a permit or license for the sale or distribution of tobacco products or electronic cigarettes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5713, as added by 1998, ch. 418, § 2, p. 1316; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 7, p. 118.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, added “or electronic cigarettes” at the end of the last sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1998, ch. 418, became effective without the governor’s signature, and provided: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1999. The Department of Health and Welfare is hereby authorized to begin rule promulgation and undertake other necessary tasks to administer the provisions of this act prior to January 1, 1999.”

§ 39-5714. Requirements for delivery sales.

  1. No permittee shall make a delivery sale of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices to any individual who is under age eighteen (18) years in this state.
  2. Each permittee taking a delivery sale order shall comply with: the age verification requirements set forth in section 39-5715, Idaho Code; the disclosure and notice requirements set forth in section 39-5716, Idaho Code; the shipping requirements set forth in section 39-5717, Idaho Code; the registration and reporting requirements set forth in section 39-5718, Idaho Code; all tax collection requirements provided by title 63, Idaho Code; and all other laws of the state of Idaho generally applicable to sales of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices that occur entirely within Idaho, including but not limited to those laws imposing excise taxes, sales and use taxes, licensing and tax stamping requirements, and escrow or other payment obligations.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5714, as added by 2003, ch. 273, § 3, p. 728; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 8, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 12, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, added the last sentence in subsection (1).

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, in subsection (1), inserted “or electronic smoking devices” near the beginning of the first sentence and deleted the second sentence, which read: “No seller shall make a delivery sale of electronic cigarettes to any minor in this state”; and inserted “or electronic smoking devices” near the end of subsection (2).

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

§ 39-5715. Age verification requirements.

No permittee shall mail or ship tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in connection with a delivery sale order unless, before mailing or shipping such tobacco products or electronic smoking devices, the permittee accepting the delivery sale order first obtains from the prospective customer a certification that includes proof of age that the purchaser is at least eighteen (18) years old, the credit or debit card used for payment has been issued in the purchaser’s name, and the address to which the tobacco products or electronic smoking devices are being shipped matches the credit card company’s address for the cardholder or employs technology that requires and authenticates independent, third-party age and identity verification services, comparing data against third-party sources.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5715, as added by 2003, ch. 273, § 3, p. 728; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 9, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 13, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, added the subsection (1) designation to the existing provisions and added subsection (2).

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

§ 39-5716. Disclosure and notice requirements.

For all delivery sales a permittee shall post on any advertisement or website:

  1. The cautionary language for signs under section 39-5704(6), Idaho Code;
  2. A prominent and clearly legible statement that consists of one (1) of the warnings set forth in section 4(a)(1) of the federal cigarette labeling and advertising act (15 U.S.C. section 1333(a)(1)) rotated on a quarterly basis;
  3. A prominent and clearly legible statement that sales of cigarettes are taxable under chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code, and an explanation of how such tax has been, or is to be paid, with respect to such delivery sale.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5716, as added by 2003, ch. 273, § 3, p. 728.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-5717. Shipping requirements — Tobacco products or electronic smoking devices.

Each permittee who mails or ships tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in connection with a delivery sale order shall include as part of the shipping documents a clear and conspicuous statement providing as follows:

“TOBACCO PRODUCTS OR ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES: IDAHO LAW PROHIBITS SHIPPING TO INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS, AND REQUIRES THE PAYMENT OF TAXES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 25, TITLE 63, IDAHO CODE. PERSONS VIOLATING THIS MAY BE CIVILLY AND CRIMINALLY LIABLE.”

Anyone delivering any such container distributes tobacco products or electronic smoking devices as defined in section 39-5702(5), Idaho Code, and is subject to the terms and requirements of this chapter. If a permittee taking a delivery sale order also delivers the tobacco products or electronic smoking devices without using a third-party delivery service, the permittee shall comply with all the requirements of vendor-assisted sales as defined in section 39-5702(15), Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5717, as added by 2003, ch. 273, § 3, p. 728; am. 2012, ch. 39, § 10, p. 118; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 14, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 39, inserted “Tobacco products” in the section heading and substituted “39-5702(16), Idaho Code” for “39-5702(14), Idaho Code” near the end of the section.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” in the section heading and throughout the section; and substituted “section39-5702(15), Idaho Code” for “39-5702(16), Idaho Code” at the end of the last sentence in the last paragraph.

§ 39-5717A. Shipping requirements

Electronic cigarettes. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2020, ch. 318, § 15, effective July 1, 2020.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5717A, as added by 2012, ch. 39, § 11, p. 118.

§ 39-5718. Registration and reporting requirements.

  1. Prior to making delivery sales or shipping tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in connection with any such sales, every business shall obtain a permit from the department and file with the state tax commission a statement setting forth the permittee’s name, trade name, and the address of the business’s principal place of business and any other place of business.
  2. No later than the tenth day of each calendar month, each permittee that has made a delivery sale or shipped or delivered tobacco products or electronic smoking devices in connection with any such sale during the previous calendar month shall file with the department and the state tax commission a memorandum or a copy of the invoice that provides for each and every such delivery sale:
    1. The name and address of the individual to whom the delivery sale was made;
    2. The brand or brands of the tobacco products or electronic smoking devices that were sold in such delivery sale; and
    3. The quantity of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices that were sold in such delivery sale.
  3. Any tobacco products or electronic smoking devices sold or attempted to be sold in a delivery sale that does not meet the requirements of this chapter shall be forfeited to the state of Idaho.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5718, as added by 2003, ch. 273, § 3, p. 728; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 16, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission,§ 63-101 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, inserted “or electronic smoking devices” following “tobacco products” throughout the section.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

Chapter 58 HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY SITING

Sec.

§ 39-5801. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “State Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5801, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5802. Legislative intent.

  1. The legislature of the state of Idaho hereby finds that adverse public health and environmental impacts can result from the improper land disposal of hazardous waste and that the need for establishing safe sites with adequate capacity for the disposal of hazardous waste is a matter of statewide concern, and the provisions of this chapter are therefore enacted to provide an effective method of establishing such sites.
  2. It is the intent of the legislature of the state of Idaho that generators of hazardous waste be encouraged to use on-site and off-site alternative treatment methods to reduce the amount of hazardous waste that must be discharged into the environment and to reduce associated hazards to the health and welfare of the citizens of this state. Alternative management technologies which detoxify, stabilize and reduce the amount of hazardous waste that must be buried are available. For such purpose, the provisions of this chapter are enacted to allow the development of safe alternative methods for the treatment of hazardous waste and to provide a means for the designation of hazardous waste disposal sites when such methods are unable to obviate the need for hazardous waste disposal on land. Whereas the state of Idaho may be responsible for the perpetual care of hazardous waste land disposal facilities, alternative technologies such as incineration, resource recovery, or physical, chemical or biological degradation should be implemented to the maximum extent possible.
  3. It is the intent of the legislature that the site license process not duplicate the existing hazardous waste management act permitting process as set forth in section 39-4409, Idaho Code. The site license is a preliminary, general review which is not based on the type of specific, detailed technical information required for the hazardous waste management act permit.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5802, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 1987, ch. 103, § 1, p. 207.

§ 39-5803. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Panel” means the site review panel created in section 39-5811 [39-5812], Idaho Code.
  2. “Committee” means the state hazardous waste management planning committee created in section 39-5805, Idaho Code.
  3. “Department” means the department of environmental quality.
  4. “Designated facility” means a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility which has received a permit or has interim status under title II of the solid waste disposal act or has a permit from the state authorized under section 3006 of title II of the solid waste disposal act (42 U.S.C.A. section 3006) [42 U.S.C. section 6926].
  5. “Director” means the director of the department of environmental quality.
  6. “Disposal” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  7. “Disposal facility” means a facility or a part of a facility at which managed hazardous waste, as defined by rule, is intentionally placed into or on any land or water and at which hazardous waste will remain after closure.
  8. “Generator” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  9. “Hazardous waste” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  10. “Hazardous waste management” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  11. “On-site” means on the same or geographically contiguous property which may be divided by a public or private right-of-way if the entrance and exit between the pieces of property are at a crossroads intersection and access is by crossing rather than going along the right-of-way. Noncontiguous pieces of property owned by the same person but connected by a right-of-way which the owner controls and to which the public does not have access is also considered on-site property.
  12. “Operator” means the person responsible for the overall operation of a disposal, treatment or storage facility with approval of the director either by contract or permit.
  13. “Person” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  14. “Plan” means the state hazardous waste management plan prepared under the provisions of section 39-5806, Idaho Code.
  15. “Storage” is defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code.
  16. “Storage facility” means a facility or part of a facility at which managed hazardous waste, as defined by rule and regulation is subject to storage.
  17. “Title II of the solid waste disposal act” means sections 1001 through 8006 of public law 89-272, 42 U.S.C. 6901, 6902 through 6910, 6912 through 6940 and 6942 through 6986.

For purposes of this chapter, words and phrases defined in section 39-4403, Idaho Code, shall carry the same meaning when used in this chapter unless the context clearly denotes otherwise.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5803, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 50, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-104.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (1) was added by the compiler to correct the statutory reference.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (4) was added by the compiler to supply the correct current codification of the referenced federal act.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-5804. Methods of hazardous waste management.

The department and the committee in the conduct of their duties under the provisions of this chapter and under the provisions of chapter 44, title 39, Idaho Code, shall assist in encouraging, developing and implementing methods of hazardous waste management which are environmentally sound, which maximize the utilization of valuable resources and which encourage resource conservation including source separation and waste reduction.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5804, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5805. State hazardous waste management planning committee — Creation — Members.

  1. The state hazardous waste management planning committee is hereby created in the department. The committee shall represent diverse geographical areas of the state. No later than September 1, 1985, the governor shall, subject to the advice and consent of the senate, appoint seventeen (17) members to the committee consisting of the following representatives:
    1. One (1) representative of city government;
    2. One (1) representative of county government;
    3. One (1) hazardous waste transporter;
    4. One (1) hazardous waste generator;
    5. One (1) hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility operator;
    6. One (1) member of an environmental group;
    7. One (1) member of a conservation group;
    8. Two (2) members of the general public;
    9. The director of the department or his designee;
    10. The director of the department of water resources or his designee;
    11. One (1) licensed professional engineer;
    12. A faculty member of a university or college in this state well versed in geology, hydrology or other environmental matters;
    13. The director of the Idaho transportation department or his designee;
    14. One (1) representative of the mining industry;
    15. One (1) representative of the forest products industry; and
    16. One (1) representative of the agricultural industry.
  2. A vacancy occurring on the committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
  3. The chairman of the committee shall be elected by the members of the committee and the chairman shall be a voting member of the committee.
  4. Members of the committee who are not state employees shall be entitled to receive compensation as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.
  5. The committee by majority vote shall establish operating procedures. The operating procedures shall be made available for public review.
  6. In the conduct of its business, the committee shall solicit the advice of, and consult periodically with cities, counties and persons within the state for the purpose of receiving information or advice that may be helpful in the preparation of the plan.
  7. Employees of the department of environmental quality, department of water resources and the transportation department shall assist the committee on a priority basis.
  8. The committee shall disband after final approval of the plan by the legislature.
  9. Upon petition to the director and the director’s recommendation to the governor, the governor shall appoint a committee in the same manner as the original committee to amend or revise the plan.
History.

(10) The committee shall hold its first meeting as soon as practicable after confirmation by the senate. History.

I.C.,§ 39-5805, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 51, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of water resources,§ 42-1701 et seq.

Transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

§ 39-5806. State hazardous waste siting management plan — Preparation — Inclusions — Studies — Public hearings — Summary — Amendments — Recommendation.

  1. Not later than January 1, 1987, the committee shall prepare a state hazardous waste siting management plan.
  2. The plan shall:
    1. Provide for a reasonable geographic distribution of hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities to meet existing and probable future needs.
    2. Be based upon location of generators, health and safety, economics of transporting, types of waste and existing hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities.
    3. Include necessary legislative, administrative and economic mechanisms, a timetable to carry out the plan.
  3. The committee may instruct the department of environmental quality, the department of water resources and the transportation department to complete studies as considered reasonably necessary for the completion of the plan. The studies may include:
    1. An inventory and evaluation of the sources of hazardous waste generation within this state or from other states, including the types and quantities of the hazardous waste.
    2. An inventory and evaluation of current hazardous waste management practices and costs, including treatment and disposal, within this state.
    3. A projection or determination of future hazardous waste management needs based on an evaluation of existing capacities, treatment or disposal capabilities, manufacturing activity, limitations and constraints. Projection of needs shall consider the types and sizes of hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, general locations within the state, management control systems, and an identified need for additional privately owned or state owned treatment, storage, or disposal facilities.
    4. An investigation and analysis of methods and incentives to encourage interstate and international cooperation in the management of hazardous waste.
    5. An investigation and analysis of methods, incentives or technologies for source reduction, reuse, recycling, or recovery of potentially hazardous waste and a strategy for encouraging the utilization or reduction of hazardous waste.
    6. An investigation and analysis of alternate methods for treatment and disposal of hazardous waste.
  4. Upon completion of the plan, the committee shall publish a notice after giving twenty (20) days’ notice as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code, in a number of newspapers and shall issue a statewide news release announcing the availability of the plan for inspection by interested persons. The announcement shall indicate where and how the plan may be obtained or reviewed and shall indicate that not less than three (3) public hearings shall be conducted at varying locations in the state before formal adoption. The first public hearing shall not be held until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date of the notice announcing the availability of the plan.
History.

(5) After public hearings, the committee shall prepare a written summary of the comments received, provide comments on the major concerns raised, make amendments to the plan as necessary and shall formally adopt the plan, and shall submit the plan to the legislature at the first regular session of the legislature following adoption of the plan. History.

I.C.,§ 39-5806, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 52, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of water resources,§ 42-1701 et seq.

Transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

§ 39-5807. Amendment or rejection of plan.

The legislature shall amend, adopt or reject the plan by passage of a concurrent resolution at the regular legislative session when it receives the plan. If the legislature amends or rejects the plan, it shall indicate its reasons for amendment or rejection by passage of a concurrent resolution and return the plan to the committee.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5807, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5808. Siting license required.

No person shall construct, expand, enlarge or alter a commercial hazardous waste disposal, treatment or storage facility or any on-site land disposal facility for wastes listed pursuant to section 201(d)(2) and (e), as modified by section 209 of “The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984,” as enacted by the U.S. congress, without a siting license from the department. The owner or operator of the facility or site rather than the builder shall be responsible for obtaining the license. Facilities exempted from permitting under the provisions of section 39-4409, Idaho Code, shall not require a license under the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5808, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

The extant provisions of sections 201 and 209 of the hazardous and solid waste amendments of 1984, referred to in this section, are codified as 42 USCS § 6924.

§ 39-5809. Permits and licenses — Issuance prior to adoption of plan.

The director may issue permits under the provisions of chapter 44, title 39, Idaho Code, or licenses pursuant to this chapter, for existing or proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities and other authorized operations before the adoption of the plan by the committee.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5809, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5810. Licenses — Issuance after adoption of plan.

After the plan has been adopted by the committee, the director shall not issue a license under the provisions of this chapter for a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility until the director has made a determination that the action is consistent with the adopted hazardous waste management plan. The director may exempt classes or categories of hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities from complying with the hazardous waste management plan if the exemption is in the public interest and consistent with state and federal law. If the director exempts classes or categories of hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities from complying with the hazardous waste management plan, rules and regulations shall be promulgated in compliance with chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, specifically indicating the exemption.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5810, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5811. Expansion, enlargement or alteration of treatment, storage, or disposal facility — Review — Siting licenses.

  1. A hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility in existence on July 1, 1985, shall not require a review under the provisions of this chapter.
  2. The expansion, enlargement, or alteration of a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility in existence on July 1, 1985, constitutes a new proposal for which a siting license is required.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5811, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5812. Site review panels — Members, chairman, quorum, meetings, staff.

  1. A site review panel shall be established to insure public input in the licensing process and to recommend to the director conditions which should be included in the siting license. Such conditions may include measures to mitigate public concerns for the following types of facilities:
    1. All commercial hazardous waste disposal facilities not in existence prior to July 1, 1985;
    2. All commercial hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities not in existence prior to July 1, 1985;
    3. Any on-site disposal of wastes listed pursuant to section 201(d) (2) and (e) as modified by section 209 of “The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984,” as enacted by the U.S. congress, for sites not in existence prior to July 1, 1985;
    4. Any significant expansion of the above-listed facilities after July 1, 1985.
  2. The following six (6) members shall serve on every panel established to review a siting license application:
    1. Three (3) members shall be representatives of this state, one (1) each from the department of environmental quality, the department of water resources and the Idaho transportation department. A member who is a representative of this state shall be appointed by each of the directors of the respective departments and a vacancy shall be filled as necessary by the appropriate director. A member who is a representative of the state shall be appointed to serve on site review panels for a period of two (2) years and may be appointed for additional two (2) year periods. In addition, a member who is a representative of the state may serve beyond the expiration of the member’s two (2) year period of service for so long a period of time as is necessary to complete action on siting license applications pending at the expiration of the member’s term.
    2. Three (3) members shall be public members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate. One (1) public member shall be a geologist or hydrologist, one (1) an engineer, and one (1) a representative of industries which generate hazardous waste. One (1) public member shall be on the faculty of an institution of higher education in this state. A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the period in the same manner as the original appointment. A member who is a public member shall be appointed to serve on site review panels for a period of three (3) years and may be appointed for additional three (3) year periods.
  3. The following four (4) members shall serve on a panel which is established to consider a particular siting license application:
    1. Two (2) members shall be appointed by the city council of the city located closest to or in which the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility is proposed to be located, at least one (1) of whom shall be a resident of the city. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular siting license application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    2. Two (2) members shall be residents of the county where the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility is proposed to be located and shall be appointed by the board of commissioners of the county. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular siting license application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review. (4) The member appointed as the representative of the state from the department shall be chairman of each panel and shall notify the city council of the nearest city and the board of county commissioners of a siting license application filed with the department, and shall instruct the city and county to appoint the necessary representatives to a panel. The chairman shall be a nonvoting member of the panel except when the chairman’s vote is necessary to break a tie vote.
  4. The member appointed as the representative of the state from the department shall be chairman of each panel and shall notify the city council of the nearest city and the board of county commissioners of a siting license application filed with the department, and shall instruct the city and county to appoint the necessary representatives to a panel. The chairman shall be a nonvoting member of the panel except when the chairman’s vote is necessary to break a tie vote.
  5. Six (6) of the ten (10) members of the panel shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business of the panel and the concurrence of six (6) members of the panel shall constitute a legal action of the panel. All meetings of the panel shall be conducted pursuant to the state open meeting law.
  6. The director shall make staff available to assist a panel in carrying out its responsibilities.
  7. Members of the panel who are not state employees shall be entitled to receive compensation as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.

A panel shall consist of ten (10) members to be appointed as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5812, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 1987, ch. 103, § 2, p. 207; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 53, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-104.

Department of water resources,§ 42-1701 et seq.

Open meetings law,§ 74-201 et seq.

Transportation department,§ 40-501 et seq.

Federal References.

The extant provisions of sections 201 and 209 of the hazardous and solid waste amendments of 1984, referred to in paragraph (1)(e), are codified as 42 USCS § 6924.

§ 39-5813. Siting license application — Fee — Rules and regulations.

  1. An application for a siting license shall include:
    1. The name and residence of the applicant;
    2. The location of the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility;
    3. Engineering or hydrogeologic information to indicate compliance with technical criteria as adopted in the hazardous waste management plan if applicable;
    4. A description of the types of wastes proposed to be handled at the facility;
    5. Information showing that harm to scenic, historic, cultural or recreational values is not substantial or can be mitigated;
    6. Information showing that the risk and impact of accident during transport of hazardous waste is not substantial or can be mitigated; and
    7. Information showing that the impact on local government is not adverse regarding health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development or can be mitigated.
  2. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the application, the director shall determine whether it is complete. If it is not complete, the director shall notify the applicant and state the areas of deficiency.
  3. The application shall be accompanied by a siting license fee. The director shall establish by rule, the scale for determining the siting license application fee. The fee shall not exceed seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) and shall be based on the cost to the department of reviewing the siting license application. The scale shall be based on characteristics including the site size, projected waste volume, and hydrogeological characteristics surrounding the site. Fees received pursuant to this section may be expended by the director to pay the actual, reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the department in acting upon a siting license application. The director may promulgate rules and regulations in compliance with chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, in order to implement and administer the provisions of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5813, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 1987, ch. 103, § 3, p. 207.

§ 39-5814. Duties of director upon receipt of a siting license application — Recommendation.

  1. Upon receipt of a complete siting license application, the director or an authorized representative of the director shall:
    1. Immediately notify the permanent panel members, the city and/or county in which the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility is located or proposed to be located, the state fire marshal, the director of the department of fish and game, the director of the Idaho state police, and each division within the department that has responsibility in land, air or water management, and other appropriate agencies. The notice shall describe the procedure and the schedule based on the complexity of the application by which the siting license may be approved or denied.
    2. Immediately publish a notice that the application has been received, as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code, in a newspaper having major circulation in the county and the immediate vicinity of the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. The required published notice shall contain a map indicating the location of the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility and shall contain a description of the proposed action and the location where the complete application package may be reviewed and where copies may be obtained. The notice shall describe the procedure by which the siting license may be granted.
  2. Upon notification by the director, the chairman shall immediately notify the representatives of the state to the panel and the public members. The chairman shall also notify the applicable county and city for their appointment of members as provided in subsection (3) of section 39-5812, Idaho Code. Within thirty (30) days after the notification, the board of commissioners of the county and the city council shall select the members to serve on the panel. The panel shall be created at that time and notification of the creation of the panel shall be made to the chairman.
  3. If technical criteria are not applicable, the director shall submit to the panel a draft site license which includes conditions based on the information submitted in the application. The director shall also recommend to the panel that the license be issued or denied. The draft license submittal shall be made within sixty-five (65) days after a complete application is received.
  4. If technical criteria as adopted in the hazardous waste management plan are applicable, the director shall determine if the proposed facility complies with the criteria. Such determination shall be made within forty-five (45) days after a complete application is received. If the technical criteria are not met, the director shall deny the license and the panel shall be disbanded. If the technical criteria are met, the director shall submit to the panel a draft site license which includes conditions regarding the technical criteria to be met. These conditions may be more stringent than those in the plan if warranted by information provided in the application. The draft license may also include additional conditions based on the information submitted in the application regarding the construction of the facility. The director shall also recommend to the panel that the license be issued or denied. The denial or draft license submittal shall be made within sixty-five (65) days after a complete application is received. The director shall immediately notify the applicant and the chairman of the panel of the denial or draft license submittal.
  5. Within ten (10) days after submittal of a draft license, the panel shall meet to review and establish a timetable for the consideration of the draft site license. (6) The panel shall:
  6. The panel shall:
    1. Set a date and arrange for publication of notice of a public hearing in a newspaper having major circulation in the vicinity of the proposed site, at its first meeting. The public notice shall:
      1. Contain a map indicating the location of the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility, a description of the proposed action, and the location where the application for a siting license may be reviewed and where copies may be obtained;
      2. Identify the time, place and location for the public hearing held to receive public comment and input on the application for a siting license;
    2. Publish the notice not less than thirty (30) days before the date of the public hearing and the notice shall be, at a minimum, a twenty (20) days’ notice as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code.
  7. Comment and input on the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility may be presented orally or in writing at the public hearing, and shall continue to be accepted in writing by the panel for fifteen (15) days after the public hearing date.
  8. The panel shall consider, among other things:
    1. The risk and impact of accident during the transportation of hazardous waste;
    2. The risk of fires or explosions from improper treatment, storage, or disposal methods;
    3. The impact on local units of government where the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility is to be located in terms of health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development. The panel shall also consider city and county ordinances, permits or other requirements and their potential relationship to the proposed hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility;
    4. The nature of the probable environmental impact.
  9. The panel’s primary responsibility shall be to consider the concerns and objections submitted by the public. The panel shall facilitate efforts to provide that the concerns and objections are mitigated by proposing additional conditions regarding the construction of the facility. The panel may propose conditions which integrate the provisions of the city or county ordinances, permits or requirements.
  10. Within ninety (90) days after creation, the panel shall recommend to the director that the license be issued as proposed, issued with different or additional conditions, or denied. The director shall make a final decision within thirty (30) days after receipt of the panel’s recommendation. If the panel recommends different or additional conditions, a clear statement of the need for the condition must be submitted to the director. If the panel recommends denial, a clear statement of the reasons for the denial must be submitted to the director.
  11. The director shall issue a siting license if the director determines that:
    1. The technical criteria are met;
    2. The harm to scenic, historic, cultural or recreational values is not substantial or can be mitigated by appropriate license conditions;
    3. The risk and impact of accident during transportation of hazardous waste is not substantial or can be mitigated with appropriate license conditions;
    4. The impact on local government is not adverse regarding health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development or can be mitigated with appropriate license conditions; and
    5. No other major concerns have been raised by the panel regarding public health or the environment which cannot be mitigated by special license conditions. (12) An applicant denied a siting license pursuant to this chapter or any person aggrieved by a decision of the director pursuant to this chapter may within twenty-eight (28) days, after all remedies have been exhausted under the provisions of this chapter, seek judicial review under the procedures provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

(13) No permit pursuant to section 39-4409, Idaho Code, shall be issued unless the applicant has been issued a site license.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5814, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 1987, ch. 103, § 4, p. 207; am. 1993, ch. 216, § 29, p. 587; am. 2000, ch. 469, § 99, p. 1450.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of fish and game,§ 36-106.

Director of state police,§ 67-2901.

State fire marshal,§ 41-254.

§ 39-5815. Notice for and creation of panel after nonrejection or approval of siting license application — Timetable for consideration of proposed facility — Public hearing — Notice — Comment and input — Municipal impact — Considerations

Advice. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5815, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220, was repealed by S.L. 1987, ch. 103, § 5.

§ 39-5816. Local restrictions on hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility construction.

An ordinance, permit requirement or other requirement of a city or county shall not prohibit the construction of a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility in that city or county.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5816, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5817. Coordination and integration with state and federal law.

The director shall coordinate and integrate the provisions of this chapter for purposes of administration and enforcement with appropriate state and federal law.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5817, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

§ 39-5818. Information obtained — Public record.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, information obtained by the department under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to be a public record.
  2. A person regulated under the provisions of this chapter may designate a record, site license application, other information, or a portion of a record, site license application, or other information furnished to or obtained by the department or its agents, as being only for the use of the department and the panel. The material shall then be subject to disclosure according to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5818, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220; am. 1990, ch. 213, § 49, p. 480; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 97, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” in subsection (2)

Effective Dates.

Section 111 of S.L. 1990, ch. 213, as amended by § 16 of S.L. 1991, ch. 329, provided that §§ 3 through 45 and 48 through 110 of the act should take effect July 1, 1993, and that §§ 1, 2, 46 and 47 take effect July 1, 1990.

§ 39-5819. Certification of city, county, or district health departments.

The department may certify a city, county or health district to administer and enforce portions of this chapter and chapter 44, title 39, Idaho Code, but only to the extent consistent with obtaining and maintaining authorization of the state’s hazardous waste management program pursuant to section 3006 of title II of the solid waste disposal act. Certification procedures shall be established by the department by rule [rules] and regulations. The director may rescind certification upon the request of the certified city, county, or health district, or after reasonable notice and hearing, if the director finds that a city, county, or health district is not administering and enforcing the provisions of this chapter or chapter 44, title 39, Idaho Code, or both, as required.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5819, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

Section 3006 of title II of the solid waste disposal act is codified as 42 USCS § 6924.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed word “rules” in the second sentence was inserted by the compiler.

§ 39-5820. Remedy for devaluation of property caused by approved facility.

  1. Before construction of a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility, but in no case later than nine (9) months after approval of a site license for a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility, any owner or user of real property adversely affected by approval may bring an action in a district court of competent jurisdiction against the owner of the proposed facility. If the court determines that the planned construction and operation of the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility will result in the devaluation of the plaintiff’s property or will otherwise interfere with the plaintiff’s rights in the property, it shall order the owner to compensate the plaintiff in an amount equal to the value of the plaintiff’s loss.
  2. The remedy provided in subsection (1) of this section shall be in addition to other remedies provided by law for owners or users aggrieved by the proposed construction and operation of a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility.
  3. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent an owner or user of property aggrieved by the construction and operation of a facility from seeking damages that result from a subsequent modification of the design or operation of a facility but such damages are limited to the incremental damage that results from the modification. Any action for such damages under this section shall be brought within nine (9) months after the siting license for modification of the design or operation of the facility is approved.
  4. For the purpose of assessing damages, the value of the rights affected is fixed at the date the siting license is approved and the actual value of the right at that date is the basis for the determination of the amount of damage suffered, and no improvements to the property subsequent to the date of approval of the plans shall be included in the assessment of damages. Similarly, for any subsequent modification of a facility, value is fixed at the date of approval of the siting license.
  5. The owner or operator of a proposed facility may, at any time before an award of damages, abandon the construction or operation of the facility or any modification and cause the action to be dismissed. As a condition of dismissal, however, the owner or operator shall compensate the plaintiff for any actual damage sustained as a result of construction or operation of the facility before abandonment together with court costs and a reasonable attorney’s fee.
  6. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent a court from enjoining any activity at a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility that is outside of, or not in compliance with, the terms and conditions of an approved hazardous waste operations permit pursuant to section 39-4409, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5820, as added by 1985, ch. 113, § 1, p. 220.

Chapter 59 IDAHO RURAL HEALTH CARE ACCESS PROGRAM

Sec.

§ 39-5901. Short title.

This act shall be known and cited as the “Idaho Rural Health Care Access Program.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5901, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5901, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5901, as added by 1991, ch. 240, § 1, p. 579, was repealed by S.L. 2000, ch. 262, § 1, effective July 1, 2000.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2000, ch. 262, which is compiled as§§ 39-5901 to 39-5913.

§ 39-5902. Rural health care access and physician incentive funds.

  1. There is hereby created in the state treasury a fund known as the “Rural Health Care Access Fund.” Subject to appropriation by the legislature, moneys in the fund shall be used exclusively for the purpose of grants for improving access to primary care medical services in areas designated as primary care health professional shortage areas and medically underserved areas and their administration pursuant to this chapter.
  2. There is hereby created in the state treasury a fund known as the “Rural Physician Incentive Fund.” Money is payable into the fund as provided for in section 33-3723, Idaho Code. The moneys in the rural physician incentive fund are hereby appropriated for the uses of the fund. The state department of health and welfare may use the moneys in the fund to pay:
    1. The educational debts of rural physicians who practice primary care medicine in medically underserved areas of the state that demonstrate a need for assistance in physician recruitment; and
    2. The expenses of administering the rural physician incentive program. The expenses of administering the program shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the annual fees assessed pursuant to section 33-3723, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5902, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 4, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-5902, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-5902, as added by 1991, ch. 240, § 1, p. 579; am. 1993, ch. 141, § 1, p. 373, was repealed by S.L. 2000, ch. 262, § 2, effective July 1, 2000.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, substituted “access and physician incentive funds” for “access fund” in the section heading and added subsection (2).

Compiler’s Notes.

The provisions in subsection (2) were derived from former§§ 33-3724 and 33-3725, which were repealed by S.L. 2012, ch. 44, §§ 2 and 3, effective July 1, 2012.

§ 39-5903. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Applicant” means an entity submitting documents required by the department for the purpose of requesting a grant from the rural health care access and physician incentive program.
  2. “Application period” means the time period from July 1 to August 30 of the state fiscal year for which funding is requested.
  3. “Approval” means written notification that the application will be awarded funding through the rural health care access and physician incentive program.
  4. “Board” means the joint health care access and physician incentive grant review board.
  5. “Community sponsoring organization” means a hospital, medical clinic or other medical organization that is located in an eligible area and employs physicians for purposes of providing primary care medical services to patients.
  6. “Department” means the department of health and welfare.
  7. “Director” means the director of the department of health and welfare.
  8. “Eligible area for physician incentive grants” means a medically underserved area of Idaho, further defined to mean an area designated by the United States secretary of health and human services as a health professional shortage area.
  9. “Grant period” means the time immediately following the application period from July 1 through June 30 (state fiscal year) for which funding is granted.
  10. “Nurse practitioner” means a health care provider licensed pursuant to chapter 14, title 54, Idaho Code.
  11. “Oral health care provider” means a dentist or dental hygienist licensed pursuant to chapter 9, title 54, Idaho Code.
  12. “Physician assistant” means a health care provider licensed pursuant to chapter 18, title 54, Idaho Code.
  13. “Primary care,” for purposes of rural health care access grants, means the provision of professional comprehensive health services, including oral health care services, that includes health education and disease prevention, initial assessment of health problems, treatment of acute care and chronic health problems, and the overall management of an individual’s or family’s health care services as provided by an Idaho licensed internist, obstetrician, gynecologist, pediatrician, family practitioner, general practitioner, dentist, dental hygienist, nurse practitioner or physician assistant. It provides the initial contact for health services and referral for secondary and tertiary care.
  14. “Primary care health professional shortage area” means a geographic area or population group which the U.S. secretary of health and human services has determined is underserved by primary care health professional(s).
  15. “Primary care medicine,” for purposes of rural physician incentive grants, means family medicine, general internal medicine and general pediatrics. Provided however, if there is a demonstrated high level of need in an eligible area as determined by the board, it may also include obstetrics and gynecology, general psychiatry, general surgery and emergency medicine.
  16. “Medically underserved area” means a geographic area which the U.S. secretary of health and human services has determined is underserved by primary care health professional(s).
  17. “Qualified medical education debt” means a debt with a financial aid program or financial institution incurred to meet the educational costs of attending a medical school. (18) “Rural health care access grant” means a grant awarded pursuant to this chapter.
  18. “Rural health care access grant” means a grant awarded pursuant to this chapter.
  19. “Rural health care access and physician incentive program” means the program that administers the rural health care access and physician incentive funds.
  20. “Rural physician,” for purposes of physician incentive grants, means a licensed Idaho physician, whether a medical doctor or doctor of osteopathic medicine, who spends a minimum of twenty-eight (28) hours per week, on average, providing primary care medicine services to patients in an eligible area.
  21. “Rural physician incentive fee” means the fee assessed by the state to students preparing to be physicians in the fields of medicine or osteopathic medicine who are supported by the state pursuant to an interstate compact for professional education in those fields, as those fields are defined by the compact.
  22. “Rural physician incentive fund” means the special revenue account in the state treasury created pursuant to section 39-5902, Idaho Code, relating to the rural health care access and physician incentive grant program.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5903, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2002, ch. 354, § 1, p. 1010; am. 2007, ch. 199, § 2, p. 605; am. 2009, ch. 119, § 1, p. 382; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 5, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 199, deleted “rural” preceding “health care” in subsection (4).

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 119, substituted “July 1 to August 30 of the state fiscal year” for “January 15 to April 15 prior to the state fiscal year” in subsection (2).

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, added subsections (5), (8), (15), (17), and (20) to (22), redesignating the existing subsections, as necessary; in subsection (1), substituted “department” for “rural health care access program” and “access and physician incentive program” for “access fund”; substituted “access and physician incentive program” for “access fund” in subsection (3); in subsection (4), inserted “joint” and substituted “access and physician incentive grant” for “access program”; in subsection (13), inserted “for purposes or rural health care access grants” near the beginning; and, in subsection (19), twice inserted “and physician incentive” and substituted “funds” for “fund” at the end.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-5904. Joint health care access and physician incentive grant review board.

  1. The director shall appoint the members of a board to be known as the joint health care access and physician incentive grant review board, who shall serve at the pleasure of the director. Board members shall not be compensated, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses incurred for attendance at board meetings.
  2. The board shall meet at least annually, for the purposes described in this chapter.
  3. The board shall be composed of the following: a representative from the Idaho academy of family physicians, a representative from the nurse practitioner conference group, a rural hospital administrator, a representative from the physician assistant association, a representative from the office of rural health, division of public health, a faculty member from one (1) of the Idaho family medicine residency programs, an Idaho medical association representative, an Idaho hospital association representative, an Idaho primary care association representative, an Idaho area health education center representative, a medical student program administrator representative from each state supported program, and an Idaho association of counties representative.
  4. Appointments to the board shall be for three (3) years. Board members may be reappointed at the end of each three (3) year period. Initial appointments shall be staggered in such a manner that approximately one-third (1/3) are appointed for one (1) year, one-third (1/3) are appointed for two (2) years, and one-third (1/3) are appointed for three (3) years.
  5. A majority of the board members constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote is required by the quorum in finalizing decisions.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5904, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2007, ch. 199, § 3, p. 605; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 6, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 199, in the section catchline and in subsection (1), deleted “rural” preceding “health care”; and in subsection (3), added “and an Idaho association of counties representative.”

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, substituted “joint health care access and physician incentive” for “health care access” in the section heading and subsection (1); and, in subsection (3), substituted “a representative from the office of rural health, division of public health” for “the health resource supervisor from the division of health”, and inserted “an Idaho area health education center representative, a medical student program administrator representative from each state supported program” near the end.

Compiler’s Notes.

Websites for organizations referenced in subsection (3):

Idaho academy of family physicians — http://idahofamilyphysicians.org

nurse practitioner conference group — http://www.npidaho.org

physician assistant association — http://idahopa.org

division of health — http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/tabid/60/Default.aspx

Idaho medical association — http://www.idmed.org/

Idaho hospital association — http://www.teamiha.org

Idaho primary care association — http://idahopca.org

Idaho association of counties — http://www.idcounties.org

§ 39-5905. Scope of rural health care access and physician incentive grant support.

The board may award grants, in accordance with the procedures and criteria in this chapter, to governmental and nonprofit entities and to physicians for qualified medical education debt repayments for the purpose of improving access to primary health care services to rural and underserved areas and for physician loan repayment.

  1. Rural health care access grant awards:
    1. Individual grant awards will be limited to a total of thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000), direct and indirect costs, per year.
    2. Applicants may propose projects for funding for up to three (3) years.
      1. Continued funding for projects beyond the first grant year, years two (2) and three (3), shall be subject to the appropriation of funds and grantee performance.
      2. No project may be funded for more than a total of three (3) years.
      3. Any unused grant funds shall be returned to the rural health care access fund by the applicant no later than June 1 of the grant period.
    3. No funds awarded under a grant may be used for purchase, construction, renovation or improvement of real property or for projects which are solely or predominantly designed for the purchase of equipment. Use of funds for the purchase of equipment may be allowed when such equipment is an essential component of a program. However, the purchase of equipment may not represent more than forty percent (40%) of the total annual share of a proposal. Indirect costs shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total project.
  2. Physician incentive grant awards:
    1. A physician selected to receive a rural physician incentive grant award shall be entitled to receive qualified medical education debt repayments for a period not to exceed four (4) years in such amount as is determined annually.
    2. Award amounts shall be established annually based on recommendations of the joint health care access and physician incentive grant review board utilizing such factors as availability of funding, the number of new applicants and the hours an award recipient will devote to providing primary care medicine in an eligible area.
    3. The award shall not exceed the qualified medical education debt incurred by the recipient, and the maximum amount of educational debt repayments that a rural physician may receive shall be one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) over such four (4) year period.
    4. All physician incentive grant awards shall be paid directly from the physician incentive fund to the physician receiving the award.
    5. In determining the awards to be made in any given year, the board shall consider the value of retaining an appropriate balance in the fund for use in future years.
    6. An award payment to a recipient in a single year is not guaranteed or assured in subsequent years and may be increased or reduced.
    7. Any unused grant funds shall be returned to the physician incentive fund by the applicant no later than June 1 of the grant period.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5905, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2009, ch. 119, § 2, p. 382; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 7, p. 132; am. 2015, ch. 159, § 1, p. 554.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 119, substituted “August 30” for “June 10” in subsection (2)(c).

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, inserted “rural health care access and physician incentive” in the section heading; in the introductory paragraph, inserted “and to physicians for qualified medical education debt repayments” and “and for physician loan repayment”; inserted the introductory paragraph in subsection (1) and redesignated the subordinate parts thereof; substituted “June 1” for “August 30” in paragraph (1)(b)(iii); and added subsection (2).

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 159, in subsection (2), substituted “one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)” for “fifty thousand dollars ($50,000” in paragraph (c) and rewrote paragraph (e), which formerly read: “The total of all awards from the rural physician incentive fund contractually committed in a year shall not exceed the annual amount deposited in the fund that same year”.

§ 39-5906. Categories of rural health care access and physician incentive grants.

  1. There are three (3) categories of rural health care access grant assistance:
    1. Telehealth projects — Grant funds may be used for projects that involve the use of telecommunications technologies for distance learning and for projects to improve access to care for rural communities.
    2. Community development projects — Grant funds may be used for health needs assessments, marketplace analysis, financial analysis and strategic planning activities.
    3. Other — Communities may choose to apply for funds for activities that they have identified and determined will help to improve access to primary care in rural areas, including loan repayment for primary care providers, recruitment incentive, and/or reimbursement of relocation expenses for primary care providers.
  2. Physician incentive grants: Grants are limited to loan repayment for physicians providing primary care medicine in eligible areas.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5906, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 8, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, inserted “rural health care access and physician incentive” in the section heading; rewrote the former introductory language which read: “There are four (4) categories of grant assistance” and designated that paragraph as subsection (1); deleted former subsection (1), which read: “Recruitment and retention of primary care providers — Grant funds may be used for loan repayment for primary care providers, recruitment incentive, and/or reimbursement of relocation expenses for primary care providers”; redesignated former subsections (2) through (4) as paragraphs (a) through (c); inserted “including load repayment for primary care providers, recruitment incentive, and/or reimbursement of relocation expenses for primary care providers” at the end of paragraph (c); and added subsection (2).

§ 39-5907. Eligibility for grants.

Applicants must meet the following requirements:

  1. Rural health care access grant awards:
    1. The geographical area to be benefitted must be located in a current primary care or dental health professional shortage area or a medically underserved area.
    2. The applicant must be a governmental entity or a nonprofit entity registered with the Idaho secretary of state.
  2. Rural physician incentive grant awards:
    1. A physician who meets the following requirements is eligible to apply for a rural physician incentive grant award:
      1. During the period covered by the award, the physician must be a rural physician providing primary care medicine in an eligible area. A physician may provide patient care services in primary care medicine in more than one (1) eligible area;
      2. The physician must be a doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathic medicine and have completed an accreditation council of graduate medical education or American osteopathic association residency;
      3. The physician must be Idaho medical board certified/board eligible, be eligible for an unrestricted Idaho medical license and be able to meet the medical staffing requirements of the sponsoring organization when applicable; and
      4. The physician must accept medicare and medicaid patients within the capacity of his or her primary care medicine practice.
      5. Documentation of one (1) or more vendor price quotes for all proposed equipment purchases;
      6. Contact person for verification of fiscal information;
    2. Physicians who have paid the fee authorized in section 33-3723, Idaho Code, shall be given a preference over other applicants.
    3. A physician shall not be entitled to receive an award under this program if the physician is receiving payments for purposes of repaying qualified medical education debt from another state or from a federal debt repayment program.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5907, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 9, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, added the introductory paragraph in subsection (1) and redesignated the subordinate parts thereof; and added subsection (2).

§ 39-5908. Rural health care access and physician incentive applications required.

  1. A completed grant application must be submitted by the applicant for the purpose of requesting a grant or contract, on or before the conclusion of the application period specified for the appropriate grant cycle. All applications must include the required information.
  2. The grant application and any attachments submitted by the applicant shall be the primary source of information for awarding a grant. Additionally, the board may request and/or use other information known to it in making its decision.
  3. All rural health care access applications shall include:
    1. Geographical area of need;
    2. Individual or entity requesting funds;
    3. Narrative description of the methods to be used to address needs and demonstrate the potential of the project to improve access to health care services in the community;
    4. Identification of measurable goals, objectives to be used to reach the goals, and the resources necessary to complete each activity;
    5. Estimation of how long it will take to accomplish the individual activities of the project;
    6. Demonstrated community and organizational support for the project;
    7. County or local governmental endorsement;
    8. Operating budget including:
    9. Proportion of operating budget, if any, the applicant proposes to match with the rural health care access grant funds;
      1. Federal tax identification number; and
    10. Other information required by the board.
  4. All rural physician incentive applications shall:
    1. Be on a form prescribed by the rural health care access and physician incentive board; and
    2. Include a letter of support along with supporting documentation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5908, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 10, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, rewrote the section heading, which formerly read: “Application required”; in subsection (1), deleted “rural health care access” following “A complete” and inserted “or contract” in the first sentence and added the second sentence; added subsection (2) and redesignated former subsections (2) and (3) as present subsections (3) and (4); substituted “All rural health care access applications” for “Each application” in the introductory paragraph in subsection (3); and rewrote subsection (4), which formerly read: “All applications must include the required information”; and deleted former subsection (4), which read: “The grant application and any attachments submitted by the applicant shall be the primary source of information for awarding a grant. Additionally, the board may request and/or use other information known to them in making their decision.”

§ 39-5909. Rural health care access and physician incentive grant award schedule.

The board shall conduct the grant process in accordance with the following schedule:

  1. The rural health care access and physician incentive program manager will generate, and make available, a list of areas eligible for potential grant assistance no later than May 1 prior to the application period.
  2. The rural health care access and physician incentive program manager shall develop an application form and make guidance available no later than July 1 which shall initiate the application period prior to the grant period.
  3. The completed application shall be submitted no later than August 30 of the application period.
  4. The board shall issue notification to every applicant regarding the disposition of their grant request by October 30 prior to the grant period.
  5. Funds for approved rural health care access grants shall be disbursed during November of that grant period or over the course of the current grant year as funds become available.
  6. Funds for approved rural physician incentive grants shall be disbursed upon completion of six (6) months of service in an eligible area during the initial grant period and annually thereafter upon completion of a twelve (12) month term of service in an eligible area.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5909, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2002, ch. 354, § 2, p. 354; am. 2009, ch. 119, § 3, p. 382; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 11, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 119, in subsection (1), substituted “May 1” for “November 15”; in subsection (2), substituted “July 1” for “January 15”; in subsection (3), substituted “August 30” for “April 15”; in subsection (4), substituted “October 30” for “June 15”; and, in subsection (5), substituted “November” for “July.”

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, added “Rural health care access and physician incentive” to the beginning of the section heading; substituted “and physician incentive program manager” for “director” in subsections (1) and (2); inserted “rural health care access” in subsection (5); and added subsection (6).

§ 39-5910. Rural health care access and physician incentive award criteria.

  1. Rural health care access awards shall be made by the board based on the following weighted criteria:
    1. Background of bidding organization. The applicant must show adequate experience, knowledge, and qualifications to adequately perform the scope of work: weight = 10%;
    2. Community and organizational support. The applicant must demonstrate community and organizational support for the project: weight = 15%;
    3. Specificity and clarity of scope of project. The proposal will be evaluated based on the extent to which the goals and objectives are specific, measurable, and relevant to the purpose of the proposal and the activities planned to accomplish those objectives are germane and can be sustained beyond the grant time frame. Additionally, there must be a demonstrated need for and lack of availability of funds from other sources to address the primary health care needs of the defined area of service: weight = 35%;
    4. Monitoring and evaluation. The proposal will be evaluated based on the extent to which the monitoring and evaluation system will document program or activity progress and measure effectiveness: weight = 15%;
    5. Budget. The proposal will be evaluated based on the extent to which a detailed itemized budget and justification are consistent with stated objectives and planned program activities: weight = 25%.
  2. Physician incentive awards shall be made by the board based on ranking and priority of applicants in accordance with the following criteria:
      1. Priority selection for physicians who were Idaho resident students and were assessed the rural physician incentive fee and paid into the fund, followed by physicians who were Idaho residents prior to completing medical school out of state and who did not contribute to the fund, followed by physicians from other states who were not Idaho residents; (a)(i) Priority selection for physicians who were Idaho resident students and were assessed the rural physician incentive fee and paid into the fund, followed by physicians who were Idaho residents prior to completing medical school out of state and who did not contribute to the fund, followed by physicians from other states who were not Idaho residents;
      2. Demonstrated physician shortage in the eligible area to be benefitted;
      3. Demonstrated physician recruiting difficulties in the eligible area to be benefitted;
      4. Support of the medical community and community leaders in the eligible area.
    1. In reviewing and weighing criteria, all relevant factors shall be considered.
    2. If a physician selected for an award of debt payments does not accept the award in the manner provided pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, then the award shall be awarded to the next eligible applicant who has not received an award.
    3. The physician is liable for the payments if the physician ceases to practice in the eligible area during the contract period.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-5910, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 12, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, added “Rural health care access and physician incentive” to the beginning of the section heading; added the subsection (1) designation to the introductory paragraph and redesignated the subordinate parts thereof; substituted “Rural health care access awards shall be made by the board” for “The board shall awards grants” at the beginning of subsection (1); and added subsection (2).

§ 39-5911. Negotiation. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2012, ch. 44, § 13, effective July 1, 2012.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5911, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734.

§ 39-5912. Fraudulent information on grant application.

Providing false information on any application or document submitted under this statute is a misdemeanor and grounds for declaring the applicant ineligible. Any and all funds determined to have been acquired on the basis of fraudulent information must be returned to the rural health care access and physician incentive grant program. This section shall not limit other remedies which may be available for the filing of false or fraudulent applications.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5912, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734; am. 2012, ch. 44, § 14, p. 132.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 44, substituted “access and physician incentive grant program” for “access fund” at the end of the second sentence.

§ 39-5913. Administrative appeals.

Applicants aggrieved by the award or failure to award a grant pursuant to this chapter shall be afforded the remedies provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-5913, as added by 2000, ch. 262, § 2, p. 734.

Chapter 60 CHILDREN’S TRUST FUND

Sec.

§ 39-6001. Children’s trust fund board — Creation.

  1. There is hereby created within the department of health and welfare a children’s trust fund and a children’s trust fund board to administer the children’s trust fund.
  2. The children’s trust fund board shall consist of a chairperson and nine (9) other members as follows:
    1. The chairperson and six (6) other members of the board shall be appointed by the governor and shall be selected for their interest and expertise in the prevention of child abuse. There shall be one (1) board member appointed from each of the seven (7) judicial districts of the state as enumerated in chapter 8, title 1, Idaho Code. Members shall be appointed to serve for three (3) year terms. Vacancies shall be filled for any unexpired term by appointment in the same manner as the original appointments were made.
    2. The superintendent of public instruction, the attorney general, and the director of the department of health and welfare or their designees shall be members and shall serve as voting members of the children’s trust fund board.
  3. A quorum of the children’s trust fund board shall consist of a majority of its members which quorum must be present in order to conduct any business.
  4. The chairperson of the children’s trust fund board shall have no vote except in the event of a tie vote of a quorum of the members of the board.
  5. Board members shall be compensated as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.
  6. Members of the children’s trust fund board shall serve until a successor has been appointed but may be removed by the appointing official for misconduct or failure to carry out the duties provided in this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6001, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 2, p. 841; am. 2014, ch. 52, § 1, p. 129.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Director of department of health and welfare,§ 56-1002 et seq.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 52, deleted “except that the chairperson and three (3) other members shall initially serve for four (4) years” at the end of the third sentence in paragraph (2)(a); and, in subsection (6), inserted “shall serve until a successor has been appointed but” and substituted “appointing official” for “governor”.

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 1985, ch. 31 read: “The legislature hereby declares that the children of the state of Idaho are its single greatest resource and that these children require the utmost protection to guard their future and the future of the state. The legislature recognizes that child abuse and neglect is a threat to the family unit and imposes major expenses on society. The legislature further declares that there is a need to assist private and public agencies in identifying and establishing community-based educational and service programs for the prevention of child abuse and neglect. It is the intent of the legislature that an increase in prevention programs will help break the cycle of child abuse and will help reduce the breakdown in families and thus reduce the need for state intervention and state expenses. It is further the intent of the legislature that prevention of child abuse and child neglect programs are partnerships between communities, citizens, and the state.”

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

An appointment of a member of the judiciary to the children’s trust account [fund] board would violate the separation of powers clause, Idaho Const., Art. II, § 1.OAG 85-5.

§ 39-6002. Children’s trust fund board — Powers and duties.

To carry out the purposes of this chapter, the children’s trust fund board may:

  1. Independently, in collaborative relationships or partnerships, contract with public or private nonprofit organizations, agencies, schools or with qualified individuals, establish community-based educational and service programs and initiatives designed to reduce or prevent the occurrence of child abuse and neglect.
    1. Each contract entered into by the board shall contain a provision for the evaluation of services provided under the contract. Contracts for services to prevent child abuse and child neglect may be awarded to new programs, existing programs, initiatives, and to demonstration projects.
    2. Continuation of contracts shall be based upon goal attainment.
  2. Facilitate the exchange of information between groups concerned with families and children.
  3. Consult with state departments, agencies, commissions and boards to help determine the probable effectiveness, fiscal soundness, and need for proposed educational and service programs for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
  4. Adopt rules pursuant to chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
  5. Employ an executive director who shall be responsible for the performance of the administrative functions of the board and such other duties as the board may direct. The board may also employ or contract with other individuals to provide professional, clerical or other services deemed necessary by the board to effectuate the provisions of this chapter and the rules of the board, and purchase or rent necessary office space, equipment and supplies. The compensation of the executive director and other personnel shall be determined by the board, and the executive director shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code.
  6. Solicit and accept grants, donations, gifts and other moneys as necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6002, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 1990, ch. 208, § 1, p. 464; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 3, p. 841; am. 2014, ch. 52, § 2, p. 129.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 52, rewrote subsection (1), which formerly read: “Contract with public or private nonprofit organizations, agencies, schools or with qualified individuals for the establishment of community-based educational and service programs designed to reduce the occurrence of child abuse and neglect. Each contract entered into by the board shall contain a provision for the evaluation of services provided under the contract. Contracts for services to prevent child abuse and child neglect may be awarded to existing programs and to demonstration projects. Continuation of contracts shall be based upon goal attainment”; in subsection (4), deleted “The children’s trust fund board may” from the beginning; rewrote subsection (5), which formerly read: “Employ and shall fix the compensation of a part-time administrator who shall be designated as the executive director of the board and who shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code”; and added subsection (6).

§ 39-6003. Criteria for programs.

  1. Programs contracted for with moneys received pursuant to section 63-3067A, Idaho Code, are intended to provide prevention services. “Prevention services” means any community-based educational or service program designed to prevent or alleviate child abuse or neglect. “Prevention services” shall not include direct treatment programs.
  2. Moneys appropriated by the legislature may also be used for salaries pursuant to subsection (5) of section 39-6002, Idaho Code.
  3. The children’s trust fund board shall develop policies to determine whether programs will receive renewed funding. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require continued funding by the state of Idaho or the children’s trust fund board.
  4. The children’s trust fund board shall prepare a report on its activities and the effectiveness of those activities in fostering the prevention of child abuse and neglect annually, and deliver that report to the governor and legislature on January 15 of each year.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6003, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 1990, ch. 208, § 2, p. 464; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 4, p. 841; am. 2014, ch. 52, § 3, p. 129.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 52, substituted “may also be used for salaries” for “also may be used for a part-time administrator” in subsection (2).

§ 39-6004. Consideration in award of contracts.

In awarding contracts pursuant to section 39-6002, Idaho Code, consideration shall be given to factors such as need, coordination with or enhancement of existing services, and evidence of community support or volunteers for the program.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6004, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 2018, ch. 169, § 10, p. 344.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 169, substituted “39-6002” for “39-5502” near the beginning of the section.

§ 39-6005. Matching funds.

The children’s trust fund board, in its discretion, may require a certain percentage of the funding for programs approved by the board be provided by the entity sponsoring or proposing the program. Contributions such as materials, personnel, supplies, physical facilities or services may be considered as all or part of the funding provided by the petitioning entity.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6005, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 5, p. 841.

§ 39-6006. Reports. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6006, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59, was repealed by S.L. 2002, ch. 292, § 6.

§ 39-6007. Children’s trust fund — Creation.

  1. There is hereby created in the state treasury the children’s trust fund.
  2. The fund shall consist of:
    1. Moneys appropriated to the fund;
    2. Moneys as provided in section 63-3067A, Idaho Code;
    3. Donations, gifts, grants and other moneys from any source; and
    4. Any other moneys which may hereafter be provided by law.
  3. Moneys in the fund may be expended for purposes provided in this chapter, provided that the children’s trust fund advisory board is authorized to expend up to fifty percent (50%) of the moneys generated annually pursuant to section 63-3067A, Idaho Code. Interest earned on the investment of idle money in the children’s trust fund shall be returned to the children’s trust fund.
  4. Disbursements of moneys from the fund shall be on the authorization of the children’s trust fund board or a duly authorized representative of the board.
  5. After the balance in the children’s trust fund has reached two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000), no further collections shall be received by the state tax commission, and all references to the fund shall be deleted from income tax forms.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6007, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 1987, ch. 337, § 4, p. 709; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 7, p. 841; am. 2005, ch. 342, § 1, p. 1069; am. 2014, ch. 52, § 4, p. 129.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission,§ 63-101 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 52, in subsection (1)(c), inserted “and other moneys”; and inserted “state” in subsection (5).

§ 39-6008. Duties of department of health and welfare.

The department of health and welfare under the direction of the children’s trust fund board shall be responsible for the management and accounting of moneys expended from the children’s trust fund.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6008, as added by 1985, ch. 31, § 2, p. 59; am. 2002, ch. 292, § 8, p. 841.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Chapter 61 IDAHO CONRAD J-1 VISA WAIVER AND NATIONAL INTEREST WAIVER PROGRAMS

Sec.

§ 39-6101. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Conrad J-1 Visa Waiver Program and National Interest Waiver Program.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6101, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 2, p. 325.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, added “and National Interest Waiver Program.”

§ 39-6102. Purpose.

Under this chapter, rural and underserved communities in Idaho would be able to apply for the placement of a foreign trained physician after demonstrating that they are unable to recruit an American physician, and all other recruitment/placement possibilities have proven to be inaccessible.

  1. The “Idaho Conrad J-1 Visa Waiver Program” authorizes the Idaho department of health and welfare to recommend up to thirty (30) foreign trained physicians per federal fiscal year to locate in communities that are federally designated as having a health workforce shortage. No more than ten (10) of thirty (30) recommendations may be for physician specialists other than pediatrics, internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, psychiatry or general surgery. Applications for specialists must demonstrate a need for the type of specialty held by the petitioning physician. Final approval of J-1 visa waiver requests are made by the United States bureau of citizenship and immigration services.
  2. Provided health care organizations located in federally designated shortage areas do not utilize the full annual allocation of J-1 visa waivers, the department will accept no more than ten (10) waiver applications six (6) months after the beginning of each federal fiscal year for petitioning J-1 visa waiver physicians to work in areas without a federal shortage area designation. The practice and petitioning physician must serve patients who reside in federally designated areas of underservice. The maximum number of flex waiver applications available to specialists is limited to no more than five (5) per federal fiscal year.
  3. The “National Interest Waiver Program” allows the Idaho department of health and welfare to testify that it is in the public’s interest that a waiver be granted to a foreign trained physician who commits to locating in a community that is federally determined as having a health workforce shortage. Final approval of the national interest waiver request is made by the United States bureau of citizenship and immigration services.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6102, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 3, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 1, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, moved the former first two sentences and designated them as subsection (1) and added subsection (2).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted the second and third sentences in subsection (1); and added subsection (2), redesignating former subsection (2) as subsection (3).

Federal References.

The United States bureau of citizenship and immigration services is established at 6 USCS § 271.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6103. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6103, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437.

§ 39-6104. Incorporation by reference.

P.L. 103-416, amended by P.L. 107-273, November 2, 2002, 8 U.S.C. 1184(l) and 22 CFR sec. 514.44(e) [22 CFR § 41.63(e)], F.R. volume 60, No. 197, 8 CFR sec. 214.12, 8 CFR sec. 245 and 18 U.S.C. 1001 are incorporated by reference.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6104, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 4, p. 325.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, inserted “8 CFR sec. 214.12, 8 CFR sec. 245.”

Federal References.

Public Law 103-416, the immigration and nationality technical corrections act of 1994, is codified throughout chapter 12, title 8, United States Code Service.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion was added by the compiler to reflect the renumbering of the referenced Code of Federal Regulations provision in 1999.

§ 39-6105. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Applicant” means a health care facility that seeks to employ a physician and is requesting state support of a J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver.
  2. “Area of underservice” means a health professional shortage area in primary care or mental health, a medically underserved area, or a medically underserved population, federally designated by the secretary of health and human services.
  3. “Department” means the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  4. “Employment contract” means a legally binding agreement between the applicant and the physician named in the J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver application which contains all terms and conditions of employment, including, but not limited to, the salary, benefits, length of employment and any other consideration owing under the agreement. The employment contract must meet all state and federal criteria, including labor and immigration rules.
  5. “Federal fiscal year” means the twelve (12) months which commence the first day of October in each year and close on the thirtieth day of September of the following year.
  6. “Flex” means the maximum of ten (10) waiver applications, with no more than five (5) available to specialists, that may be submitted six (6) months following the beginning of each federal fiscal year for J-1 visa waiver physicians to work in areas without a federal shortage area designation.
  7. “Full time” means a working week of a minimum of forty (40) hours at one (1) or more health care facilities.
  8. “Health care facility” means an entity with an active Idaho taxpayer identification number doing business or proposing to do business in the practice location where the physician would be employed, whose stated purposes include the delivery of primary medical or mental health care.
  9. “Interested government agency” means an agency that has the authority from the United States department of state to submit requests for J-1 visa waivers of foreign physician petitioners on behalf of public interest.
  10. “J-1 visa” means an entrance permit into the United States for a foreign trained physician who is a nonimmigrant admitted under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the United States information and education exchange act or who acquired such status or who acquired exchange visitor status under the act.
  11. “J-1 visa waiver” means a federal action that waives the requirement for a foreign physician, in the United States on a J-1 visa, to return to his home country for a two (2) year period following medical residency training.
  12. “National interest waiver” means an exemption from the labor certification process administered by the United States department of labor for foreign physicians whose will to stay in the United States and work in an area of underservice in Idaho is determined to be in the public interest by the Idaho department of health and welfare.
  13. “New start” means a health care facility as defined in subsection (8) of this section, that has been in existence for twelve (12) months or less.
  14. “Petitioning physician” means the foreign physician, named in the J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver application, who requires a waiver to remain in the United States to practice medicine. (15) “Primary care” means a medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy licensed in pediatrics, family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, general surgery or psychiatry.
  15. “Primary care” means a medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy licensed in pediatrics, family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, general surgery or psychiatry.
  16. “Sliding fee discount schedule” means a written delineation documenting the value of charge discounts granted to patients based upon financial hardship and federal poverty guidelines.
  17. “Specialist” means a medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy in any specialty or subspecialty other than pediatrics, family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, general surgery or psychiatry.
  18. “Unmet need” means a vacancy or shortage of primary care or specialist physicians experienced by a community or population, as defined by federally designated health professional shortage areas or medically underserved areas/populations or as demonstrated by additional data and information required by the department.
  19. “Vacancy” means a full-time physician practice opportunity in the delivery of health care services.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6105, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 5, p. 325; am. 2014, ch. 61, § 1, p. 144; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 2, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in subsections (1), (5), and (14), inserted “J-1” and “or national interest waiver” preceding and following “visa waiver”; added the last sentence in subsection (2); in subsection (7), substituted “at one (1) or more health care facilities” for “at a health care facility”; added subsections (11) and (12), and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly; and deleted former subsection (17), which was the definition for “visa waiver.”

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 61, inserted “general surgery” near the end of subsection (15).

Federal References.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, deleted the former last sentence in subsection (2), which read: “Physician scarcity areas as determined by the centers for medicaid and medicare services are included for the purpose of placing national interest waiver petitioning physicians”; deleted former subsection (4), which read: “De-designation threshold’ means the number of full-time equivalent primary care physicians necessary to remove the federal designation as an area of underservice”; redesignated former subsections (5) and (6) as present subsections (4) and (5); added present subsection (6); inserted “Petitioning” at the beginning of subsection (14); added subsection (17), redesignating former subsections (17) and (18) as present subsections (18) and (19); in subsection (18), substituted “primary care or specialist physicians” for “primary care health physicians” near the beginning and added “or as demonstrated by additional data and information required by the department” at the end; and substituted “health care services” for “primary care services” at the end of subsection (19). Federal References.

The reference in subsection (10) to the United States information and education exchange act should be to the immigration and nationality act. See 8 USCS § 1101(a)(15)(J).

Compiler’s Notes.

For additional information on the J-1 visa program, referred to in this section, see https://j1visa.state.gov .

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6106. General requirements and limitations.

  1. J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver request. The department may only submit a waiver request when:
    1. The application contains all of the required information and documentation; and
    2. The application meets all state and federal criteria; and
    3. Foreign exchange physicians having a J-1 case number assigned by the United States department of state have paid all federal processing fees; and
    4. The applicant has paid the state of Idaho application processing fee.
  2. Limitations of department actions.
    1. Prior to submission of an application, the department may provide information to the applicant on preparing a complete application.
    2. The department will not be responsible for adding any information to incomplete application packets.
    3. For applicants who have benefited from department waiver requests previously, the applicant’s history of compliance will be a consideration in future decisions for waiver requests.
    4. In any single program year, a health care facility will not be allotted more than two (2) J-1 visa waiver request applications per practice location.
    5. The shortage area designation must be current on the date the United States department of state reviews and recommends the application and on the date the immigration agency approves the J-1 visa waiver and national interest waiver. Any application that is being submitted to the department at the end of the three (3) year health professional shortage area designation cycle may be summarily denied if the renewal is not obtained.
      1. Participation by the department in the J-1 visa waiver program and in the national interest waiver program is completely discretionary and voluntary. The department may elect not to participate in the program at any time. The submission of a complete waiver application package does not ensure the department will recommend a waiver. The department reserves the right to recommend or decline any request for a waiver.
      2. The department, its employees or agents are held harmless of any perceived consequence for the denial of a waiver petitioner, or the approved placement of one that is not favorable.
      3. Application procedures for J-1 visa waiver physician placements were developed by the department in compliance with P.L. 103-416 and subsequent revisions. The procedures for the issuance of national interest waiver recommendations were developed by the department in compliance with 8 CFR sec. 214.12 and 8 CFR sec. 245 and subsequent revisions. These procedures are subject to updates and changes at any time. Interpretation of these procedures rests solely with the department in consultation with the appropriate federal agencies.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6106, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 6, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 3, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in the introductory language in subsection (1), substituted “J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver request” for “Visa waiver request” and deleted “visa” following “submit a”; in subsection (2)(d)(i), inserted “J-1 visa”; in subsection (2)(d)(ii), inserted “J-1”; in the first sentence in subsection (2)(e), inserted “and national interest waiver”; in subsection (2)(e)(i), in the first sentence, deleted “Idaho conrad” preceding “J-1 visa waiver” and inserted “and in the national interest waiver program” and, in the third sentence, inserted “application”; and, in subsection (2)(e)(iii), in the first sentence, deleted “Idaho conrad” preceding “J-1 visa waiver” and added the second sentence.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, in subsection (2), rewrote paragraph (d), which formerly read: “In any single program year, a health care facility in any one (1) area of underservice: (i) Will not be allotted more than two (2) J-1 visa waiver request applications; and (ii) Will not exceed by more than one and nine-tenths (1.9) full-time equivalents, the number of J-1 physicians needed to eliminate the physician shortage as defined by the current de-designation threshold in any single program year”.

Federal References.

P.L. 103-416, referred to in paragraph (2)(e)(iii), is codified as 8 U.S.C.S. § 1401 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6107. Applied principles.

  1. Option of last resort. The J-1 visa waiver and national interest waiver programs are considered a final source for recruiting qualified physicians. These programs are not a substitute for broad recruiting efforts for graduates from United States medical schools, but an option of last resort. Any application that qualifies for consideration under any other interested government agency or federal program, such as the one administered by the department of health and human services, must be submitted under that program in lieu of the J-1 visa waiver program. The option of last resort principle does not apply to national interest waiver petitioning physicians for whom a J-1 visa waiver request was issued by the state of Idaho; in which case, physician retention is the objective if it is determined to be in the public interest.
  2. Waiver request applications will only be considered for health care facilities that can provide evidence of sustained active recruitment over a period of at least six (6) months for the physician vacancy in the practice location. The six (6) month vacancy requirement does not apply to a national interest waiver petitioning physician for whom a J-1 visa waiver request was issued by the state of Idaho.
  3. The J-1 visa waiver program and national interest waiver program will be used to assist health care facilities that can document the provision of health care services to all residents of the federally determined area of underservice. When a federal designation is for an underserved population, the health care facility must document the provision of care to, and assure access by, the underserved population.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6107, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 7, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 4, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in subsection (1), in the first sentence, inserted “J-1” and “and national interest waiver” and, in the fourth sentence, deleted “Idaho conrad” preceding “J-1 visa waiver” and added the last sentence; in subsection (2), added the last sentence; and, in subsection (3), inserted “J-1” and “and national interest waiver program” and substituted “federally determined area of underservice” for “federally designated underserved area.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, substituted “physician vacancy” for “primary care vacancy” near the end of the first sentence in subsection (2) and substituted “health care services” for “primary health care services” in the first sentence in subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6108. Criteria for applicants.

  1. Applicants must be existing health care facilities that:
    1. Have an active taxpayer identification number in Idaho; and
    2. Have provided medical or mental health care in Idaho for a minimum of twelve (12) months prior to submitting the application, or meet the requirements for a new start as defined in this chapter.
  2. The waiver request to the department must come from a U.S. health care facility on behalf of the physician and not directly from the physician or his representative.
  3. J-1 visa waiver and national interest waiver petitioners with fellowship training must contract with employers to provide primary care services full time.
  4. Applicants must not be former J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver physicians who are currently fulfilling their required three (3) or five (5) year obligation.
  5. Applicants may not submit waiver requests for a relative.
  6. Applicants must accept all patients regardless of their ability to pay.
  7. Except for state institutional and correctional facilities designated as federal shortage areas, the applicant must:
    1. Serve medicare clients, medicaid clients, low-income clients, uninsured clients, and the population of a federal shortage designation.
    2. Agree to implement a sliding fee discount schedule. The schedule must be:
      1. Available in Spanish (where applicable) and English; and
      2. Posted conspicuously; and
      3. Distributed in hard copy on request to individuals making or keeping appointments with that physician.
  8. Applicants must have a signed employment contract with the physician, and guarantee wages for the duration of the contract.
  9. Applicants must cooperate in providing the department with clarifying information, verifying information already provided, or in any investigation of the applicant’s financial status and payer mix.
  10. Applicants must first apply through any organization with federal or interested governmental agency authority which submits waiver requests for Idaho’s underserved rural areas. Documentation which fully explains why this route was not taken for placement is required as part of the application.
  11. The physician’s name and practice location will be made available to the public as a provider who accepts medicare, medicaid and utilizes a sliding fee schedule for the low-income population.
  12. An assurance letter that the health care facility, its principals, and the J-1 or national interest waiver petitioning physician are not under investigation for, under probation for, or under restriction for medicare or medicaid fraud, or other violations of law or licensure restrictions that may indicate that it may not be in the public interest that a waiver be granted, must be provided.
  13. The applicant and its principals must be free of default on any federal or state scholarship or loan repayment program such as the national health service corps or by the state.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6108, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 8, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 5, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in subsection (3), inserted “and national interest waiver”; in subsections (4) and (12), inserted “or national interest waiver”; in subsection (4), inserted “or five (5)”; in subsection (8), substituted “for the duration of the contract” for “for the three (3) years of the contract”; and, in subsection (12), deleted “of the two (2) year home residency requirement” preceding “be granted.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, substituted “a federal shortage designation” for “the federal designation” at the end of paragraph (7)(a); and deleted “of primary health” following “public as a provider” near the middle of subsection (11).

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6109. Contract requirements for J-1 visa waivers.

Throughout the period of obligation, regardless of the petitioning physician’s visa status, the employment contract must:

  1. Meet state and federal requirements;
  2. Not prevent the physician from providing medical services in the designated shortage area after the term of employment. A noncompetition clause or any provision that purports to limit the J-1 visa waiver physician’s ability to remain in the area upon completion of the contract term is prohibited by regulation;
  3. State that the physician must serve medicare clients, medicaid clients, low-income clients, uninsured clients, and the population of the federal designation for the area of underservice full time;
  4. Include a notarized statement by the physician that he agrees to meet the requirements set forth in section 214(l) of the immigration and nationality act;
  5. Guarantee the physician a base salary of at least ninety-five percent (95%) of step II of the local prevailing wage for the field of practice in the area to be served;
  6. Specify that benefits offered are not included as part of base salary;
  7. Include leave (annual, sick, continuing medical education and holiday);
  8. State that amendments shall adhere to state and federal J-1 visa waiver requirements;
  9. Acknowledge that the contract may be terminated only with cause and cannot be terminated by mutual agreement until the statutorily required three (3) years of medical service have expired;
  10. Be assignable only by the employer to a successor with concurrence of the department;
  11. Include the practice site address, the days and hours of practice, field of medicine, and a statement that on-call and travel times are not included in the minimum hours;
  12. Include a statement that the employment will start within ninety (90) days after the waiver approval has been issued;
  13. Not commence until after the petitioning physician’s J-1 waiver and appropriate work authorization are approved and the residency program has been successfully completed. The contract shall affirm that no transfer or other modification regarding the duration of contract dates will be approved unless extenuating circumstances are shown to exist, as determined by the department and approved by the United States attorney general in accordance with applicable federal rules and regulations;
  14. Not be subject to changes which result in termination of contract, change in practice scope, or relocation from a site approved in the application. Any proposed changes must be presented in writing to the department for consideration and approval at least thirty (30) days prior to the proposed change. Moving or placement of a J-1 visa waiver physician to a location that was not approved by the department will result in the physician and applicant being in noncompliance with the program and will be reported as such to the immigration agency. It will also limit the applicant’s future participation in the program;
  15. Be signed by both the J-1 visa waiver petitioning physician and the applicant employer, and the date it is signed must be clear.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6109, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 9, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 6, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in the section catchline, added “for J-1 visa waivers”; and in subsection (9), inserted “of medical service.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “the petitioning” near the middle of the introductory paragraph; added subsection (12), redesignating the remaining subsections accordingly; in the first sentence in present subsection (13), inserted “petitioning” near the beginning; and inserted “J-1 visa waiver” near the beginning of the third sentence in present subsection (14).

Federal References.

Section 214( l ) of the immigration and nationality act, referred to in subsection (4), is codified as 8 U.S.C.S. 1184( l ).

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6109A. Contract requirements for national interest waivers.

Throughout the period of obligation, regardless of physician’s visa status, the employment contract must:

  1. Meet state and federal requirements;
  2. Not prevent the physician from providing medical services in the designated shortage area after the term of employment. A noncompetition clause or any provision that purports to limit the national interest waiver physician’s ability to remain in the area upon completion of the contract term is prohibited;
  3. State that the physician must serve medicare clients, medicaid clients, low-income clients, uninsured clients and the population of the federal designation for the area of underservice full time;
  4. Guarantee the physician a base salary of at least ninety-five percent (95%) of step II of the local prevailing wage for the field of practice in the area to be served;
  5. Specify that benefits offered are not included as part of the base salary;
  6. Include annual, sick, continuing medical education and holiday leave;
  7. State that amendments shall adhere to state and federal national interest waiver requirements;
  8. Acknowledge that the contract may be terminated only with cause and cannot be terminated by mutual agreement until the statutorily required five (5) years of medical service have expired;
  9. Be assignable only by the employer to a successor with concurrence of the department;
  10. Include the practice site address, the days and hours of practice and field of medicine;
  11. Include a statement that the employment will start within ninety (90) days after the waiver approval has been issued;
  12. Not be subject to changes which result in termination of contract, change in practice scope or relocation from a site approved in the application. Any proposed changes must be presented in writing to the department for consideration and approval at least thirty (30) days prior to the proposed change. Moving or placement of a physician to a location that was not approved by the department will result in the physician and applicant being in noncompliance with the program. It will also limit the applicant’s future participation in the program; and
  13. Be signed by both the national interest waiver petitioning physician and the applicant employer, and the date it is signed must be clear.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6109A, as added by 2009, ch. 106, § 10, p. 325.

§ 39-6110. Criteria for proposed practice location.

  1. The proposed practice location must:
    1. Be located in an area of underservice federally designated by the secretary of health and human services; or
    2. Serve patients who reside in an area of underservice federally designated by the secretary of health and human services for flex waiver applications only.
  2. If a new practice location is planned, additional criteria apply. New practice locations must:
    1. Have the legal, financial, and organizational structure necessary to provide a stable practice environment, and must provide a business plan that supports this information;
    2. Support a full-time physician practice;
    3. Have written referral plans that describe how patients using the new practice care location will be connected to existing secondary and tertiary care if needed.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6110, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 11, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 7, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, added subsection (1)(d) and redesignated former subsection (1)(d) as subsection (1)(e).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, rewrote subsection (1) to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable; and substituted “practice care location” for “primary care location” near the middle of paragraph (2)(c).

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6111. Criteria for the J-1 petitioning physician.

  1. The petitioning physician must not have a J-1 visa waiver pending for any other employment offer, and must provide a notarized statement testifying to this fact.
  2. The physician must have the qualifications described in recruitment efforts for a specific vacancy.
  3. Petitioning physicians must:
    1. Provide direct patient care full time; and
    2. Be trained in:
      1. Family medicine;
      2. Internal medicine;
      3. Pediatrics;
      4. Obstetrics and gynecology;
      5. General surgery;
      6. Psychiatry and its subspecialties; or
      7. Other specialties licensed or eligible for licensure by the Idaho board of medicine, if there is a demonstrated need by the applicant organization.
  4. Physicians must apply and be eligible for an active Idaho medical license. The petitioning physician may be participating in an accredited residency program for this application, but must have successfully completed the third year of their residency training program for their employment contract to be activated. The petitioning physician must have an unrestricted license to practice in the state of Idaho and be board certified or eligible in his respective medical specialty at the commencement of employment. A copy of the acknowledgment of receipt form from the state board of medicine must be included in the waiver request.
  5. Physicians must have at least one (1) recommendation from their residency program that:
    1. Addresses the physician’s interpersonal and professional ability to effectively care for diverse and low-income persons in the United States;
    2. Describes an ability to work well with supervisory and subordinate medical staff, and adapt to the culture of United States health care facilities;
    3. Documents the level of specialty training, if any;
    4. Is prepared on residency program letterhead and is signed by residency program staff or faculty; and
    5. Includes name, title, relationship to physician, address, and telephone number of signatory.
  6. The petitioning physician must agree with all provisions of the employment contract as described in section 39-6109, Idaho Code. Other negotiable terms of the contract are between the petitioning physician and the hiring agency.
  7. The petitioning physician must:
    1. Agree to work full time for no less than three (3) years in an area of underservice in the state of Idaho;
    2. Provide health care to medicare and medicaid beneficiaries;
    3. Post and implement a sliding fee discount schedule;
    4. Serve the low-income population;
    5. Serve the uninsured population; and
    6. Serve the shortage designation population; or
    7. Serve the population of a local, state, or federal governmental institution or corrections facility as an employee of the institution.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6111, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 12, p. 325; am. 2014, ch. 61, § 2, p. 144; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 8, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in the section catchline, inserted “J-1 petitioning”; and in subsection (4), substituted “must apply and be eligible for an active Idaho medical license” for “must have an active Idaho medical license” in the first sentence, added “at the commencement of employment” in the third sentence, and substituted “copy of the acknowledgement of receipt form from the state board of medicine” for “copy of the license” in the last sentence.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 61, in subsection (3), inserted present paragraph (b)(v) and redesignated former paragraph (b)(v) as paragraph (b)(vi).

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “petitioning” preceding “physician” near the beginning of subsections (1), (3), (6), and (7), and in the second and third sentences in subsection (4) and near the middle of the last sentence in subsection (6); and added paragraph (3)(b)(vii).

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6111A. Flex waivers for J-1 petitioning physicians.

The department will accept no more than ten (10) waiver applications six (6) months after the beginning of each federal fiscal year for petitioning J-1 visa waiver physicians to work in areas without a federal shortage area designation. The practice and petitioning physician must serve patients who reside in federally designated areas of underservice. The maximum number of flex applications may not exceed the total number of waiver slots available.

  1. The practice location must be located outside of a federally designated shortage area to apply for a flex waiver.
  2. The applicant organization and petitioning physician must meet all eligibility, application and reporting requirements with the exception of the practice location.
  3. The applicant organization must submit documentation demonstrating how the practice location and petitioning physician will serve patients who reside in federally designated areas of underservice.
  4. The maximum number of flex waiver applications available for specialists is limited to no more than five (5) per federal fiscal year.
  5. Flex waiver applications must demonstrate a need for the primary care or specialty petitioning physician.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6111A, as added by 2017, ch. 72, § 9, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-6111A was amended and redesignated as§ 39-6111B, pursuant to S.L. 2017, ch. 72, § 10.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6111B. Criteria for the national interest waiver petitioning physician.

The national interest waiver petitioning physician must:

    1. Provide direct patient care full time; and (1)(a) Provide direct patient care full time; and
    2. Be trained in:
      1. Family medicine;
      2. Internal medicine;
      3. Pediatrics;
      4. Obstetrics and gynecology;
      5. General surgery; or
      6. Psychiatry and its subspecialties.
  1. Apply and be eligible for an active Idaho medical license. The physician may be participating in an accredited residency program for this application, but must have successfully completed the third year of his residency training program for his employment contract to be activated. The physician must have an unrestricted license to practice in the state of Idaho and be board certified or eligible in his respective medical specialty at the commencement of employment. A copy of the acknowledgment of receipt form from the state board of medicine must be included in the waiver request.
  2. Have at least one (1) recommendation from their residency program and one (1) from a previous employer, if applicable, that:
    1. Addresses the physician’s interpersonal and professional ability to effectively care for diverse and low-income persons in the United States;
    2. Describes an ability to work well with supervisory and subordinate medical staff, and adapt to the culture of United States health care facilities;
    3. Documents the level of specialty training, if any;
    4. Is prepared on residency program letterhead or the employer’s business letterhead and is signed by residency program staff or faculty; and
    5. Includes name, title, relationship to physician, address and phone number of signatory.
  3. Agree with all provisions of the employment contract as described in section 39-6109A, Idaho Code. Other negotiable terms of the contract are between the physician and the hiring agency.
    1. Agree to work full time for no less than five (5) years in an area of underservice in the state of Idaho unless the physician qualifies for the three (3) year service provision under the applicable national interest waiver rules and regulations or the physician is transferring from another area of underservice; (5)(a) Agree to work full time for no less than five (5) years in an area of underservice in the state of Idaho unless the physician qualifies for the three (3) year service provision under the applicable national interest waiver rules and regulations or the physician is transferring from another area of underservice;
    2. Provide health care to medicare and medicaid beneficiaries;
    3. Post and implement a sliding fee discount schedule;
    4. Serve the low-income population;
    5. Serve the uninsured population; and
    6. Serve the shortage designation population; or
    7. Serve the population of a local, state or federal governmental institution or corrections facility as an employee of the institution.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6111A, as added by 2009, ch. 106, § 13, p. 325; am. 2014, ch. 61, § 3, p. 144; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 72, § 10, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 61, in subsection (1), inserted present paragraph (b)(v) and redesignated former paragraph (b)(v) as paragraph (b)(vi).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-6111A and was redesignated as this section, pursuant to S.L. 2017, ch. 72, § 10.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6112. Joint reporting requirement upon commencement of practice.

  1. Notification of waiver status and commencement of employment must be submitted to the department upon receipt of written notification of approval from the immigration agency. This notification must include the date the medical service obligation commences, and a copy of the notification of approval from the immigration agency.
  2. The waiver physician and the applicant must, on commencement of practice and annually thereafter or more frequently as determined by the department, and upon expiration of the physician’s service obligation to the underserved area, verify the physician’s practice site address and field of practice. Further, documentation that the population the physician was to serve was indeed served must be submitted. This will include the facility’s payer mix, the number of patients seen by the physician, and the payer mix of those patients. When submitting the final report, the physician must indicate whether he intends to remain in the shortage area to practice.
  3. Sites receiving waiver approval must agree to report to the department on the status of the physician’s activities at the beginning of the physician’s employment and every year thereafter during the three (3) to five (5) year medical service obligation period. Failure to provide these reports within thirty (30) days of the annual anniversary date of approval of the J-1 visa or national interest waiver in an accurate manner or failure to demonstrate good faith in utilizing a physician’s services in accordance with these policies will jeopardize future eligibility for placements and will be cause for reporting and referral to the United States department of state and immigration agency. This referral could ultimately lead to deportation proceedings against the physician.
  4. Any amendments made to the required elements of the employment contract during the physician’s medical service obligation must be reported to the department for review. The department will complete review and provide notice of approval or declination of such amendments within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6112, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 14, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 11, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, substituted “the medical service obligation” for “the three (3) year obligation” in the second sentence in subsection (1); substituted “the physician’s service obligation to the underserved area” for “the first three (3) years of the contract” in the first sentence in subsection (2); in subsection (3), substituted “the three (3) to five (5) year medical service obligation period” for “the three (3) year waiver service period” in the first sentence, inserted “or national interest waiver” in the second sentence, and deleted “J-1” preceding “physician” at the end of the last sentence; and substituted “the physician’s medical service obligation” for “the first three (3) years for primary care physicians of contracted employment” in the first sentence in subsection (4). The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, in subsection (2), inserted “waiver” near the beginning of the first sentence and deleted “for population designated health professional shortage areas” following “Further” at the beginning of the second sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6113. Application fee.

At the time the application is submitted to the department, an administrative fee must be paid to the department by the applicant. The fee amount will be determined by the director of the department, will not be less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for a J-1 visa waiver request, and three hundred fifty dollars ($350) for a national interest waiver request, and may be revised at the beginning of the state fiscal year by the director based on costs to administer the program. The fee is nonrefundable.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6113, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 15, p. 325.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, inserted “for a J-1 visa waiver request, and three hundred fifty dollars ($350) for a national interest waiver request” in the second sentence.

§ 39-6114. Required application forms and accompanying documents for a J-1 visa waiver request.

  1. Applications for the J-1 visa waiver program must include, but not be limited to, the following:
    1. Evidence the applicant has no other mechanism through another process or interested government agency to apply for a J-1 visa waiver for the petitioning physician;
    2. Evidence of recruiting efforts over a minimum of six (6) months prior to when the physician applied for the vacancy; this must include regional and national electronic or print advertising stating the position available and the practice site location. Copies of advertisements submitted must show the publication date. Advertisements run at the time of or after preparation of the employment contract are unusable. Online advertisements must show dates the advertisements were online. Contracts with recruitment firms are allowable as evidence in lieu of electronic or print advertisements if the activities described in this section are provided under contract. Recruitment firm contracts must be included if applicable;
    3. Evidence that the petitioning physician selected for the position visited the practice site;
    4. A mailing list of physicians who applied for the position and the reason they were not selected;
    5. Evidence that the applicant has been providing medical or mental health care in Idaho for at least twelve (12) months or meets the requirements for a new start as defined in this chapter. This includes, but may not be limited to, the Idaho taxpayer identification number, facility address, fax and telephone numbers, and staffing list;
    6. A copy of an employment contract between the petitioning physician and the applicant for no less than three (3) years;
    7. Evidence that the employment site is in a designated area of underservice;
    8. The request must be submitted by the applicant or applicant’s representative. The letter must be written on the applicant’s letterhead stationery, which includes address, telephone and fax numbers, if any. Letters, contracts and forms must contain original signatures;
    9. A copy of the sliding fee scale which the health care facility must agree to implement and post;
    10. A copy of the petitioning physician’s license to practice medicine in the state of Idaho, or proof of the physician’s eligibility to apply for an Idaho license;
    11. Legible copies of all IAP-66/DS 2019 forms (certificate of eligibility for exchange visitor status), covering every period the physician was in J-1 status, submitted in chronological order;
    12. Legible copies (front and back) of all I-94 entry and departure cards for the physician and family members;
    13. The petitioning physician’s curriculum vitae;
    14. A statement of “no objection from the government” of the petitioning physician’s country of nationality, if applicable. The government of the country to which the petitioning physician is otherwise contractually obliged to return must furnish a letter to the director of the United States department of state with a statement in writing that there is no objection to such waiver in cases where the petitioning physician’s medical education or training is funded by the government of the petitioning physician’s home country. Whether or not there is foreign government funding can be determined from examining the physician’s IAP-66 form. This letter must be in English and follow the procedures and format outlined in federal register volume 60, number 197, published October 12, 1995 (or subsequent revisions);
    15. Payment of the department’s administrative application processing fee;
    16. Federal form G-28 or letterhead from the law office, if the physician is being represented by an attorney, with telephone and fax numbers, and a contact name and address;
    17. A copy of the United States department of state issued instruction sheet with case number.
  2. The state may require any other documentation or information for the support and approval process in the waiver application on the part of the petitioning physician or the applicant.
  3. These requirements are subject to change without notice.
  4. J-1 visa waiver program application forms and instructions are available and may be requested from the department.
  5. The petitioning physician’s case number must appear on each page. The case number is assigned by the United States department of state.
  6. All required information and documentation must be submitted in a single package with all documents presented per instructions that will be provided by the department upon request. One (1) single-sided, unbound original and one (1) single-sided, unbound copy must be included. Waiver requests that do not comply with these requirements and the instructions provided by the department will not be considered.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6114, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 16, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 12, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in the section catchline, added “for a J-1 visa waiver request”; in the introductory language in subsection (1) and in subsection (4), deleted “Idaho conrad” preceding “J-1 visa waiver”; and, in subsection (1)(j), added “in the state of Idaho, or proof of the physician’s eligibility to apply for an Idaho license.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “petitioning” preceding “physician” throughout the section; and in paragraph (1)(b), in the first sentence, inserted “electronic or” near the middle and deleted “and at least six (6) certified letters to medical schools to advertise the vacancy” from the end, and substituted “electronic or print advertisements” for “print advertisements or letters” near the middle of the fifth sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

The J-1 visa waiver and national interest waiver programs are administered by the state office of rural health and primary care. See http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/ Health / RuralHealthandPrimaryCare / J1 VisaWaiverNationalInterestWaiver / tabid / 413/Default.aspx .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6114A. Required application forms and documents for a national interest waiver request.

  1. Applications for the national interest waiver program must include, but not be limited to, the following:
    1. Evidence of recruiting efforts over a minimum of six (6) months prior to when the petitioning physician applied for the vacancy. This evidence must include regional and national electronic or print advertising stating the position available and the practice site location. Copies of advertisements submitted must show the publication date. Advertisements run at the time of or after preparation of the employment contract are unusable. Online advertisements must show dates the advertisements were online. Contracts with recruitment firms are allowable as evidence in lieu of electronic or print advertisements if the activities described in this paragraph are provided under contract. Recruitment firm contracts must be included, if applicable. The provision of evidence for recruitment efforts over a six (6) month period is not necessary for national interest waiver petitioning physicians who receive a J-1 visa waiver at the request of the state of Idaho;
    2. Evidence that the physician selected for the position visited the practice site;
    3. A mailing list of physicians who applied for the position and the reason they were not selected;
    4. Evidence that the applicant has been providing medical or mental health care in Idaho for at least twelve (12) months or meets the requirements for a new start as defined in section 39-6105, Idaho Code. This includes, but may not be limited to, the Idaho taxpayer identification number, facility address, fax and telephone numbers and staffing list;
    5. A copy of an employment contract between the physician and the applicant;
    6. Evidence that the employment site is in a federally determined area of underservice;
    7. The request must be submitted by the applicant or applicant’s representative. The letter must be written on the applicant’s letterhead stationery, which includes address, telephone and fax numbers, if any. Letters, contracts and forms must contain original signatures;
    8. A copy of the sliding fee scale which the health care facility must agree to implement and post;
    9. A copy of the physician’s license to practice medicine in the state of Idaho, or eligibility to apply for an Idaho license;
    10. Legible copies of any DS 2019 forms (formerly IAP-66), and other United States immigration documentation attesting to the physician’s current legal status and history of stay in the United States;
    11. The physician’s curriculum vitae; and
    12. Payment of the department’s administrative application processing fee.
  2. The state of Idaho may require any other documentation or information for the support and approval process in the waiver application on the part of the physician or the applicant.
  3. These requirements are subject to change without notice.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6114A, as added by 2009, ch. 106, § 17, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 13, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES
Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, in paragraph (1)(a), in the first sentence, inserted “petitioning” and, in the second sentence, inserted “electronic or” preceding “print advertising” near the middle and deleted “and at least six (6) certified letters to medical schools to advertise the vacancy” from the end, and substituted “electronic or print advertisements” for “print advertisements or letters” near the middle of the fifth sentence.

Compiler’s Notes.

The J-1 visa waiver and national interest waiver programs are administered by the state office of rural health and primary care. See http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/ Health / RuralHealthandPrimaryCare / J1 VisaWaiverNationalInterestWaiver / tabid / 413/Default.aspx .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6115. Criteria applied to federally designated facilities.

Local, state, or federal institutions which offer health care services and are federally designated as a shortage facility accompanied by a health professional shortage area score may submit an application. Physician services may be limited to the population of the institution. All other state and federal requirements must be met.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6115, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 14, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, substituted “health care services” for “primary care services” near the beginning of the first sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6116. Department review and action.

  1. The department will review applications for completeness in date order received.
  2. Applications submitted for petitioning physicians with language skills appropriate to the community they wish to serve will be given priority.
  3. Selection preference will be given to applications received from health professional shortage areas having the greatest unmet need for physicians.
  4. Applications must be mailed, sent by commercial carrier, or delivered in person. Applications may not be sent electronically. The department is not responsible for applications or related materials lost in the mail.
  5. The department may limit the time period during which applications may be submitted including refusing to process applications after the department has submitted requests for all applications allowed in a given federal fiscal year.
  6. In the event an applicant for a J-1 visa waiver or a national interest waiver submits an application to the department, the department will acknowledge receipt of the copy of the application within five (5) business days of receipt.
  7. The department will review applications within thirty (30) working days of receipt of the application to determine if the application is complete, and provide a written explanation of missing items.
  8. An additional fee will not be charged for incomplete applications if the missing items are provided within thirty (30) calendar days of the date on the letter of explanation from the department. If new information is not received within this time frame, the application will be returned to the applicant. The application fee will not be returned.
  9. The department will return applications and application fees to applicants having had two (2) approved J-1 visa waiver requests in the current federal fiscal year for the shortage area or applications received after thirty (30) placements have been recommended.
  10. The department will review complete applications against the criteria specified in this chapter.
  11. The department may:
    1. Request additional clarifying information;
    2. Verify information presented;
    3. Investigate the financial status of the applicant;
    4. Request verification of the health care facility’s payer mix for the previous twelve (12) to eighteen (18) months; and
    5. Return the application as incomplete if the applicant does not supply the requested clarifying information in its entirety within thirty (30) days of request. The application fee is nonrefundable. Incomplete applications must be resubmitted with the application fee. Resubmitted applications will be considered new applications and will be reviewed in date order received.
  12. The department may request the director of the United States department of state to recommend that the immigration agency grant the J-1 visa waiver.
  13. The department may provide a letter of attestation to the immigration agency that the physician’s work in Idaho is in the public interest for a national interest waiver.
  14. The department will notify the applicant in writing of action taken by the department. If the decision is to decline the J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver request, the department will provide an explanation of how the application failed to meet the stated criterion or criteria. The application fee is nonrefundable. (15) The department may deny a J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver request or, prior to United States department of state or immigration agency approval, may withdraw a J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver recommendation for cause, which shall include the following:
  15. The department may deny a J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver request or, prior to United States department of state or immigration agency approval, may withdraw a J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver recommendation for cause, which shall include the following:
    1. The application is not consistent with state or federal criteria;
    2. Fraud;
    3. Misrepresentation;
    4. False statements;
    5. Misleading statements;
    6. Evasion or suppression of material facts in the J-1 visa waiver or national interest waiver application or in any of its required documentation and supporting materials;
    7. Incomplete or insufficient information;
    8. Allowable number of recommendations for the facility or year has been met.
  16. Applications denied may be resubmitted with concerns addressed, with the application fee. Resubmitted applications will be considered new applications and will be reviewed in date order received.
  17. The department retains the authority to audit, monitor and conduct unannounced site visits.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6116, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 18, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 15, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in subsections (6) and (14), and throughout subsection (15), inserted “or a national interest waiver” or similar language; in subsection (12), inserted “J-1 visa”; added subsection (13) and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly; in the introductory paragraph in present subsection (15), twice inserted “J-1” and inserted “or immigration agency”; and in subsection (15)(f), inserted “J-1.”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “petitioning” near the beginning of the subsection (2); substituted “health professional shortage area having the greatest unmet need for physicians” for “HPSAs having the greatest unmet need for primary care physicians” at the end of subsection (3); substituted “thirty (30) working days” for “fifteen (15) working days” near the beginning of subsection (7); substituted “shortage area or applications” for “shortage area, applications received that exceed the de-designation threshold limit, and applications” near the end of subsection (9); and substituted “facility” for “area” near the end of paragraph (15)(h).

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on health professional shortage areas, referred to in subsection (3), see http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/oRuralHealthandPrimaryCare/ShortageDesignations/tabid/415/Default.aspx .

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6117. Eligibility for future participation.

Health care facilities may be denied future participation in the J-1 visa waiver program or national interest waiver program if:

  1. The required annual reports are not submitted in a complete and timely manner;
  2. A waiver physician does not serve the designated shortage area or shortage population approved at the time of placement for the full three (3) to five (5) years of employment. This does not apply only if the approved site is in a designated health professional shortage area that loses its designation after the waiver physician begins employment;
  3. A waiver physician does not remain employed by the applicant for the full three (3) to five (5) years of employment;
  4. The applicant or waiver physician is not in compliance with the terms defined in this chapter or any federal requirements.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6117, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2009, ch. 106, § 19, p. 325; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 16, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 106, in the introductory paragraph, deleted “Idaho conrad” preceding “J-1 visa waiver” and inserted “or national interest waiver program”; ;and, in subsections (2) and (3), inserted “to five (5).”

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “waiver” preceding “physician” throughout the section.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

§ 39-6118. Department responsibility to report.

The department shall report to the United States department of state and the immigration agency if the applicant or waiver physician is determined to be out of compliance with any of the provisions of this chapter or if the waiver physician is determined to have left employment in the federally designated area.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6118, as added by 2004, ch. 128, § 1, p. 437; am. 2017, ch. 72, § 17, p. 171.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 72, inserted “waiver” preceding “physician” throughout the section.

Effective Dates.

Section 18 of S.L. 2017, ch. 72 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 2017.

Chapter 62 PCB WASTE DISPOSAL

Sec.

§ 39-6201. Short title. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6201, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6202. Legislative findings and purposes. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6202, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6203. Definitions. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6203, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 54, p. 253, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6204. Legislative intent. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6204, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6205. Rules and regulations in general. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6205, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6206. General powers and duties of director. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6206, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6207. Unauthorized disposal of PCB waste prohibited. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6207, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6208. Records — Reporting

Monitoring. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6208, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411; am. 1990, ch. 213, § 50, p. 480, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6209. Investigation — Inspection

Right of entry. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6209, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6210. Enforcement procedures. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6210, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6211. Remedies. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6211, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6212. Violation — Penalty

Misdemeanor. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6212, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6213. Interstate cooperation. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6213, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6214. Employment security. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6214, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6215. Good samaritan protection. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6215, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

§ 39-6216. Severability. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6216, as added by 1987, ch. 198, § 1, p. 411, was repealed by S.L. 2007, ch. 83, § 7.

Chapter 63 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRIME PREVENTION

Sec.

§ 39-6301. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Domestic Violence Crime Prevention Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6301, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

CASE NOTES

Standard of Proof.

The standard of proof in protection order proceedings under the domestic violence crime prevention act is by a preponderance of the evidence. Ellibee v. Ellibee, 121 Idaho 501, 826 P.2d 462 (1992).

§ 39-6302. Statement of purpose.

For purposes of this chapter, the legislature adopts by reference the declaration of policy in section 39-5201, Idaho Code. Additionally, the legislature finds that a significant number of homicides, aggravated assaults, and assaults and batteries occur within the home between adult members of families. Furthermore, research shows that domestic violence is a crime which can be deterred, prevented or reduced by legal intervention. Domestic violence can also be deterred, prevented or reduced by vigorous prosecution by law enforcement agencies and prosecutors and by appropriate attention and concern by the courts whenever reasonable cause exists for arrest and prosecution.

The purpose of this act is to address domestic violence as a serious crime against society and to assure the victims of domestic violence the protection from abuse which the law and those who enforce the law can provide.

It is the intent of the legislature to expand the ability of the courts to assist victims by providing a legal means for victims of domestic violence to seek protection orders to prevent such further incidents of abuse. It is the intent of the legislature that the official response to cases of domestic violence shall stress the enforcement of the laws to protect the victim and shall communicate the attitude that violent behavior in the home is criminal behavior and will not be tolerated. It is the intent of the legislature to presume the validity of protection orders issued by courts in all states, the District of Columbia, United States territories and all federally recognized Indian tribes within the United States, and to afford full faith and credit to those orders. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed liberally to promote these purposes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6302, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 1, p. 305; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 1, p. 888.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in the second paragraph refers to S.L. 1988, ch. 341, which is codified as§§ 39-6301 to 39-6306 and 39-6307 to 39-6317.

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

§ 39-6303. Definitions.

  1. “Domestic violence” means the physical injury, sexual abuse or forced imprisonment or threat thereof of a family or household member, or of a minor child by a person with whom the minor child has had or is having a dating relationship, or of an adult by a person with whom the adult has had or is having a dating relationship.
  2. “Dating relationship,” for the purposes of this chapter, is defined as a social relationship of a romantic nature. Factors that the court may consider in making this determination include:
    1. The nature of the relationship;
    2. The length of time the relationship has existed;
    3. The frequency of interaction between the parties; and
    4. The time since termination of the relationship, if applicable.
  3. “Family member” means spouses, former spouses and persons related by blood, adoption or marriage.
  4. “Family dwelling” is any premises in which the petitioner resides.
  5. “Foreign protection order” means a protection order issued by a tribunal of another state.
  6. “Household member” means persons who reside or have resided together, and persons who have a child in common regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time.
  7. “Judicial day” means any day upon which court business may be transacted as provided in sections 1-1606 and 1-1607, Idaho Code.
  8. “Protection order” means any order issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or acts of harassment against, or contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another person, where the order was issued:
    1. Pursuant to this chapter;
    2. In another jurisdiction pursuant to a provision similar to section 39-6306, Idaho Code; or
    3. In any criminal or civil action, as a temporary or final order (other than a support or child custody order), and where the order was issued in a response to a criminal complaint, petition or motion filed by or on behalf of a person seeking protection, and issued after giving notice and an opportunity to respond to the person being restrained.
  9. “Respondent” means the individual against whom enforcement of a protection order is sought.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6303, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 2, p. 305; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 2, p. 888; am. 2000, ch. 136, § 1, p. 355; am. 2002, ch. 213, § 1, p. 587; am. 2002, ch. 331, § 1, p. 937; am. 2003, ch. 16, § 9, p. 48.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2002 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2002 amendment, by ch. 213, added the definition of “foreign protection order,” redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly, and added the definition of “respondent.”

The 2002 amendment, by ch. 331, added the language beginning “or of an adult” at the end of the definition of “domestic violence,” rewrote the definition of “family member,” added the definition of “household member,” and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly.

Legislative Intent.

Section 4 of S.L. 2000, ch. 136 provides: “In enacting this legislation it is the intent of the Legislature to recognize the rights of parents to provide protection for their minor children. No other intent is expressed or implied.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

Section 18 of S.L. 2003, ch. 16 declared an emergency. Approved February 12, 2003.

CASE NOTES

Dating Relationship.

In a prosecution under§ 18-923, definition of “dating relationship” was not facially vague because it could not be said that there was no type of relationship that plainly fell within this definition. State v. Laramore, 145 Idaho 428, 179 P.3d 1084 (Ct. App. 2007).

Former Spouse.

Even though former husband had joint legal custody of children, the domestic violence crime prevention act was the proper vehicle for divorced mother to obtain protection order against her former husband in favor of their children. Ellibee v. Ellibee, 121 Idaho 501, 826 P.2d 462 (1992).

§ 39-6304. Action for protection.

  1. There shall exist an action known as a “petition for a protection order” in cases of domestic violence.
  2. A person may seek relief from domestic violence by filing a petition based on a sworn affidavit with the magistrates division of the district court, alleging that the person or a family or household member, whether an adult or a child, is the victim of domestic violence. Any petition properly filed under this chapter may seek protection for any additional persons covered by this chapter. A custodial or noncustodial parent or guardian may file a petition on behalf of a minor child who is the victim of domestic violence.
  3. A person’s right to petition for relief under this chapter shall not be affected by that person’s having left the residence or household to avoid abuse.
  4. The petition shall disclose the existence of any custody or any marital annulment, dissolution or separation proceedings pending between the parties, the existence of any other custody order affecting the children of the parties, and the existence of child protection or adoption proceedings affecting the children of any party.
  5. When the petitioner requests custody of any child, the petition shall disclose:
    1. The county and state where the child has resided for six (6) months immediately prior to the filing of the petition;
    2. The party or other responsible person with whom the child is presently residing; and
    3. The party or other responsible person with whom the child has resided for six (6) months immediately prior to the filing of the petition.
  6. A petition shall be filed in the county of the respondent’s residence, the petitioner’s residence, or where the petitioner is temporarily residing.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6304, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 3, p. 305; am. 2000, ch. 136, § 2, p. 355.

STATUTORY NOTES

Legislative Intent.

Section 4 of S.L. 2000, ch. 136 provides: “In enacting this legislation it is the intent of the Legislature to recognize the rights of parents to provide protection for their minor children. No other intent is expressed or implied.”

CASE NOTES

Former Spouse.
Protection Order.

Even though former husband had joint legal custody of children, the domestic violence crime prevention act was the proper vehicle for divorced mother to obtain protection order against her former husband in favor of their children. Ellibee v. Ellibee, 121 Idaho 501, 826 P.2d 462 (1992). Protection Order.

Ninety-day protection order was properly entered under this chapter, because the testimony of the petitioner and the petitioner’s then spouse suggested that the spouse could act unpredictably, and in a potentially dangerous manner, and that the spouse constituted a threat to the bodily safety of both the petitioner and the petitoner’s child. Turner v. Turner, 155 Idaho 819, 317 P.3d 716 (2013).

§ 39-6305. Fees waived.

No filing fee, service fee, hearing fee or bond shall be charged for proceedings seeking only the relief provided under this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6305, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

§ 39-6306. Hearing on petition for protection order — Relief provided and realignment of designation of parties.

  1. Upon filing of a petition based upon a sworn affidavit for a protection order, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the relief sought shall be granted within fourteen (14) days. If either party is represented by counsel at a hearing seeking entry of a protection order, the court shall permit a continuance, if requested, of the proceedings so that counsel may be obtained by the other party. If the court finds that it is necessary for both parties to be represented by counsel, the court shall enter appropriate orders to ensure that counsel is retained. The order entered may require either the petitioner or respondent, or both, to pay for costs of counsel. Upon a showing that there is an immediate and present danger of domestic violence to the petitioner the court may, if requested, order for a period not to exceed one (1) year that:
    1. Temporary custody of the minor children of the petitioner or of the parties be awarded to the petitioner or respondent if exercise of such jurisdiction is consistent with the provisions of section 32-11-204, Idaho Code, and consistent with prior custody orders entered by a court of competent jurisdiction unless grounds exist pursuant to section 32-717, Idaho Code;
    2. A party be restrained from committing acts of domestic violence;
    3. Exclude the respondent from the dwelling which the parties share or from the residence of the petitioner;
    4. The respondent be ordered to participate in treatment or counseling services. The council on domestic violence [and victim assistance], in recognition of the particular treatment requirements for batterers, shall develop minimal program and treatment standards to be used as guidelines for recommending approval of batterer programs to the court;
    5. Other relief be ordered as the court deems necessary for the protection of a family or household member, including orders or directives to a peace officer, as allowed under this chapter;
    6. The respondent be required to pay service fees, and to reimburse the petitioner for costs incurred in bringing the action, including a reasonable attorney’s fee;
    7. The respondent be restrained from harassing, annoying, disturbing the peace of, telephoning, contacting, or otherwise communicating, directly or indirectly, with the petitioner and any designated family member or specifically designated person of the respondent’s household, including the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner;
    8. The respondent be restrained from entering any premises when it appears to the court that such restraint is necessary to prevent the respondent from contacting, harassing, annoying, disturbing the peace of or telephoning the petitioner or the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner; and/or
    9. The respondent be restrained from coming within one thousand five hundred (1,500) feet or other appropriate distance of the petitioner, the petitioner’s residence, the school or place of employment of the petitioner, or any specified place frequented by the petitioner and by any other designated family member or specifically designated person of the respondent’s household, including the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner. (2) Immediate and present danger under this section includes, but is not limited to, situations in which the respondent has recently threatened the petitioner with bodily harm or engaged in domestic violence against the petitioner or where there is reasonable cause to believe bodily harm may result.

(3) No order made under this chapter shall in any manner affect title to real property.

(4) Relief shall not be denied because petitioner used reasonable force in self-defense against respondent, or because petitioner or respondent was a minor at the time of the incident of domestic violence.

(5) Any relief granted by the protection order, other than a judgment for costs, shall be for a fixed period not to exceed one (1) year; provided, that an order obtained pursuant to this chapter may, upon motion and upon good cause shown, continue for an appropriate time period as directed by the court or be made permanent if the requirements of this chapter are met, provided the order may be terminated or modified by further order of the court either on written stipulation filed with the court or on the motion of a party and after a hearing on the motion. The motion to renew an order may be granted without a hearing, if not timely objected to by the party against whom the order was entered.

(6) In providing relief under this chapter, the court may realign the designation of the parties as “petitioner” and “respondent” where the court finds that the original petitioner is the abuser and the original respondent is the victim of domestic violence.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6306, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 4, p. 305; am. 1990, ch. 234, § 1, p. 667; am. 1991, ch. 300, § 1, p. 787; am. 1995, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1212; am. 2000, ch. 227, § 3, p. 623; am. 2006, ch. 287, § 1, p. 883.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 287, near the end of the introductory paragraph of subsection (1) and in subsection (5), substituted “one (1) year” for “three (3) months”; rewrote subsection (1)(g), which formerly read: “The respondent be restrained from contacting, molesting, interfering with or menacing the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner; and/or”; in subsection (1)(h), substituted “harassing, annoying, disturbing the peace of or telephoning” for “molesting, interfering with or menacing”; added subsection (1)(i); in subsection (2), added “or where there is reasonable cause to believe bodily harm may result” at the end; and, in the first sentence of subsection (5), substituted “continue for an appropriate time period as directed by the court or be made permanent” for “be renewed for additional terms not to exceed one (1) year each,” and added the proviso at the end.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in paragraph (1)(d) was added by the compiler to supply the full name of the referenced agency. See§ 39-5203.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2006, ch. 287 declared an emergency. Approved March 31, 2006.

CASE NOTES

Burden of Proof.

Burden of proof under this chapter is the preponderance of the evidence. Turner v. Turner, 155 Idaho 819, 317 P.3d 716 (2013).

Protection Order.

Ninety-day protection order was properly entered under this chapter, because the testimony of the petitioner and the petitioner’s then spouse suggested that the spouse could act unpredictably, and in a potentially dangerous manner, and that the spouse constituted a threat to the bodily safety of both the petitioner and the petitioner’s child. Turner v. Turner, 155 Idaho 819, 317 P.3d 716 (2013).

It was not an abuse of discretion to issue a civil protection order on a child’s behalf against a father: (1) the father’s claims of a right to discipline the child and protect the father from the child did not bar the order, as the father had no parental duty to exercise the discipline used, nor did the father act in self-defense or use reasonable force, and (2) an immediate and present danger of domestic violence warranted the issuance of the order, as the child’s concussion and cervical strain were physical injuries sustained in a recent domestic violence incident. Doe v. Doe, 160 Idaho 854, 380 P.3d 175 (2016).

§ 39-6306A. Uniform interstate enforcement of domestic violence protection orders act.

  1. Short Title. This section may be cited as the “Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act.”
  2. Definitions. As used in this section:
    1. “Issuing state” means the state whose tribunal issues a protection order.
    2. “Mutual foreign protection order” means a foreign protection order that includes provisions in favor of both the protected individual seeking enforcement of the order and the respondent.
    3. “Protected individual” means an individual protected by a protection order.
    4. “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The term includes an Indian tribe or band that has jurisdiction to issue protection orders.
    5. “Tribunal” means a court, agency, or other entity authorized by law to issue or modify a protection order.
  3. Judicial Enforcement of Order.
    1. A person authorized by the law of this state to seek enforcement of a protection order may seek enforcement of a valid foreign protection order in a tribunal of this state. The tribunal shall enforce the terms of the order, including terms that provide relief that a tribunal of this state would lack power to provide but for this section. The tribunal shall enforce the order, whether the order was obtained by independent action or in another proceeding, if it is an order issued in response to a complaint, petition or motion filed by or on behalf of an individual seeking protection. In a proceeding to enforce a foreign protection order, the tribunal shall follow the procedures of this state for the enforcement of protection orders.
    2. A tribunal of this state may not enforce a foreign protection order issued by a tribunal of a state that does not recognize the standing of a protected individual to seek enforcement of the order.
    3. A tribunal of this state shall enforce the provisions of a valid foreign protection order which govern custody and visitation if the order was issued in accordance with the jurisdictional requirements governing the issuance of custody and visitation orders in the issuing state.
    4. A foreign protection order is valid if it:
      1. Identifies the protected individual and the respondent;
      2. Is currently in effect;
      3. Was issued by a tribunal that had jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter under the law of the issuing state; and
      4. Was issued after the respondent was given reasonable notice and had an opportunity to be heard before the tribunal issued the order or, in the case of an order ex parte, the respondent was given notice and has had or will have an opportunity to be heard within a reasonable time after the order was issued, in a manner consistent with the rights of the respondent to due process.
    5. A foreign protection order valid on its face is prima facie evidence of its validity.
    6. Absence of any of the criteria for validity of a foreign protection order is an affirmative defense in an action seeking enforcement of the order. (g) A tribunal of this state may enforce provisions of a mutual foreign protection order which favor a respondent only if:
      1. The respondent filed a written pleading seeking a protection order from the tribunal of the issuing state; and
      2. The tribunal of the issuing state made specific findings in favor of the respondent.
  4. Nonjudicial Enforcement of Order.
    1. A law enforcement officer of this state, upon determining that there is probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists and that the order has been violated, shall enforce the order as if it were the order of a tribunal of this state. Presentation of a foreign protection order that identifies both the protected individual and the respondent and, on its face, is currently in effect constitutes probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists. For the purposes of this subsection, the foreign protection order may be inscribed on a tangible medium or may have been stored in an electronic or other medium if it is retrievable in perceivable form. Presentation of a certified copy of a foreign protection order is not required for enforcement.
    2. If a foreign protection order is not presented, a law enforcement officer of this state may consider other information in determining whether there is probable cause to believe that a valid foreign protection order exists.
    3. If a law enforcement officer of this state determines that an otherwise valid foreign protection order cannot be enforced because the respondent has not been notified or served with the order, the officer shall inform the respondent of the order, make a reasonable effort to serve the order upon the respondent, and allow the respondent a reasonable opportunity to comply with the order before enforcing the order.
    4. Registration or filing of an order in this state is not required for the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order pursuant to this section.
  5. Registration of Order.
    1. Any individual may register a foreign protection order in this state pursuant to section 39-6311, Idaho Code. To register a foreign protection order, an individual shall present a copy of a protection order which has been certified by the issuing state to a court of this state in order to be entered in the Idaho law enforcement telecommunications system pursuant to section 39-6311, Idaho Code.
    2. An individual registering a foreign protection order shall file with the court an affidavit by the protected individual stating that, to the best of the protected individual’s knowledge, the order is currently in effect.
    3. A fee may not be charged for the registration of a foreign protection order.
    4. A foreign protection order registered under this section may be entered in any existing state or federal registry of protection orders, in accordance with applicable law.
  6. Immunity. This state or a local governmental agency, or a law enforcement officer, prosecuting attorney, clerk of court, or any state or local governmental official acting in an official capacity, is immune from civil and criminal liability for an act or omission arising out of the registration or enforcement of a foreign protection order or the detention or arrest of an alleged violator of a foreign protection order if the act or omission was done in good faith in an effort to comply with this section.
  7. Uniformity of Application and Construction. In applying and construing this section, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it. (8) Transitional Provision. This section applies to foreign protection orders issued before July 1, 2002, and to continuing actions for enforcement of foreign protection orders commenced before July 1, 2002. A request for enforcement of a foreign protection order made on or after July 1, 2002, for violations of a foreign protection order occurring before that date is governed by this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6306A, as added by 2002, ch. 213, § 3, p. 587; am. 2003, ch. 213, § 1, p. 558.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6306A, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6306A, as added by 1999, ch. 330, § 3, p. 888, was repealed by S.L. 2002, ch. 213, § 2.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Hartzell, 155 Idaho 107, 305 P.3d 551 (Ct. App. 2013).

§ 39-6307. Security.

Whenever a protection order is issued under this chapter, the issuing court may set a security amount for a violation of the order.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6307, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

§ 39-6308. Ex parte temporary protection order.

  1. Where an application under this section alleges that irreparable injury could result from domestic violence if an order is not issued immediately without prior notice to the respondent, the court may grant an ex parte temporary protection order based upon the affidavit submitted or otherwise shall hold a hearing which may be ex parte on the day a petition is filed or on the following judicial day to determine whether the court should grant an ex parte temporary protection order, pending a full hearing, and grant such other relief as the court deems proper, including an order:
    1. Restraining any party from committing acts of domestic violence;
    2. Excluding any party from the dwelling shared or from the residence of the other until further order of the court;
    3. Restraining any party from interfering with the other’s custody of the minor children or from removing the children from the jurisdiction of the court;
    4. Ordering other relief as the court deems necessary for the protection of a family or household member, including orders or directives to a peace officer, as allowed under this chapter;
    5. Restraining the respondent from contacting, molesting, interfering with or menacing the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner;
    6. Restraining the respondent from entering any premises when it appears to the court that such restraint is necessary to prevent the respondent from contacting, molesting, interfering with or menacing the petitioner or the minor children whose custody is awarded to the petitioner; and/or
    7. Restraining the respondent from taking more than personal clothing and toiletries and any other items specifically ordered by the court.
  2. An ex parte hearing to consider the issuance of a temporary protection order may be conducted by telephone in accordance with procedures established by the Idaho supreme court.
  3. Irreparable injury under this section includes but is not limited to situations in which the respondent has recently threatened the petitioner with bodily injury or has engaged in acts of domestic violence against the petitioner.
  4. The court shall hold an ex parte hearing on the day the petition is filed or on the following judicial day.
History.

(5) An ex parte temporary protection order shall be effective for a fixed period not to exceed fourteen (14) days, but may be reissued. A full hearing, as provided in this chapter, shall be set for not later than fourteen (14) days from the issuance of the temporary order. The respondent shall be served with a copy of the ex parte order along with a copy of the petition and notice of the date set for the hearing. If the ex parte temporary protection order substantially affects the respondent’s rights to enter the domicile or the respondent’s right to custody or visitation of the respondent’s children and the ends of justice so require, the respondent may move the court for an order shortening the time period within which the hearing required under the provisions of section 39-6306, Idaho Code, must be held. Motions seeking an order shortening the time period must be served upon the petitioner at least two (2) days prior to the hearing on the motion. History.

I.C.,§ 39-6308, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 5, p. 305; am. 1990, ch. 234, § 2, p. 667.

CASE NOTES

Probable Cause for Arrest for Violation.

Police officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for false arrest claims brought against them where they could not have reasonably believed that the arrest complied with the Fourth Amendment since any reasonably competent officer would have ascertained the terms of the protection order before making the arrest for failing to comply with it. Beier v. City of Lewiston, 354 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2004), overruled on other grounds, City of Los Angeles v. Mendez, 137 S. Ct. 1539, 198 L. Ed. 2d 52 (2017).

Protection Order.

Ninety-day protection order was properly entered under this chapter, because the testimony of the petitioner and the petitioner’s then spouse suggested that the spouse could act unpredictably, and in a potentially dangerous manner, and that the spouse constituted a threat to the bodily safety of both the petitioner and the petitioner’s child. Turner v. Turner, 155 Idaho 819, 317 P.3d 716 (2013).

§ 39-6309. Issuance of order — Assistance of peace officer — Designation of appropriate law enforcement agency.

When an order is issued or a foreign protection order is recognized under this chapter upon request of the petitioner, the court may order a peace officer to accompany the petitioner and assist in placing the petitioner in possession of the dwelling or residence, or otherwise assist in the execution of the protection order. A certified copy of the order shall be prepared by the clerk for transmittal to the appropriate law enforcement agency as specified in section 39-6311, Idaho Code. Orders issued or foreign protection orders recognized under this chapter shall include an instruction to the appropriate law enforcement agency to execute, serve, or enforce the order.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6309, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 4, p. 888; am. 2002, ch. 213, § 4, p. 587.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

§ 39-6310. Order and service.

  1. An order issued under this chapter along with a copy of the petition for a protection order, if the respondent has not previously received the petition, shall be personally served upon the respondent, except as provided in subsections (6), (7) and (8) of this section.
  2. A peace officer of the jurisdiction in which the respondent resides shall serve the respondent personally unless the petitioner elects to have the respondent served by a private party at the petitioner’s own expense.
  3. If service by a peace officer is to be used, the clerk of the court shall have a copy of any order issued under this chapter and a copy of the petition for a protection order, if the respondent has not previously received the petition, forwarded on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order for service upon the respondent. Service of an order issued under this chapter shall take precedence over the service of other documents unless they are of a similar emergency nature.
  4. If the peace officer cannot complete service upon the respondent within ten (10) days, the sheriff or municipal peace officer shall notify the petitioner. The petitioner shall provide information sufficient to permit notification.
  5. Returns of service under this chapter shall be made in accordance with the applicable court rules.
  6. If an order entered by the court recites that the respondent appeared in person before the court and receives a copy of the order, the necessity for further service is waived and proof of service of that order is not necessary.
  7. If a party has appeared in person before the court and has waived personal service, the clerk of the court shall complete service of any notice of hearing or orders or modifications by certified mail to the party’s address as shown on the court petition which resulted in the issuance of the order or modification. Parties shall at all times keep the court informed of their current mailing address.
  8. If a foreign protection order is registered with the court under section 39-6306A, Idaho Code, the necessity for further service is waived and proof of service of that order is not necessary.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6310, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1996, ch. 236, § 1, p. 765; am. 1997, ch. 69, § 1, p. 144; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 5, p. 888; am. 2000, ch. 72, § 1, p. 154; am. 2002, ch. 213, § 5, p. 587.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

CASE NOTES

Duty to Serve.

Where the record supported the conclusion that there was a substantial basis for the issuance of a protection order, it was the duty of the deputy to serve the order upon issuance. State v. Mathews, 133 Idaho 300, 986 P.2d 323 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1168, 120 S. Ct. 1190, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1095 (2000).

§ 39-6311. Order — Transmittal to law enforcement agency — Record in Idaho public safety and security information system — Enforceability.

  1. The orders issued under sections 39-6306 and 39-6308, Idaho Code, or foreign protection orders recognized under section 39-6306A, Idaho Code, shall be in a form approved by the supreme court of the state of Idaho.
    1. A copy of a protection order granted or a foreign protection order recognized under this chapter shall be forwarded by the clerk of the court on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order. (2)(a) A copy of a protection order granted or a foreign protection order recognized under this chapter shall be forwarded by the clerk of the court on or before the next judicial day to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the order.
    2. Upon receipt of the order, the law enforcement agency shall forthwith enter the order and its expiration date into the Idaho public safety and security information system available in this state used by law enforcement agencies to list outstanding warrants. Notification of service as required in section 39-6310, Idaho Code, shall also be entered into the Idaho public safety and security information system upon receipt. Entry into the Idaho public safety and security information system constitutes notice to all law enforcement agencies of the existence of the order. The order is fully enforceable in any county in the state. Renewals of the order shall be recorded in the same manner as original orders. The information entered shall specifically state that the protection order is civil in nature. If the appropriate law enforcement agency determines that the service information sheet is incomplete or cannot be entered into the Idaho public safety and security information system upon receipt, the service information sheet shall be returned to the clerk of the court. The clerk of the court shall then notify the petitioner of the error or omission.
  2. Law enforcement agencies shall establish procedures reasonably adequate to assure that an officer approaching or actually at the scene of an incident of domestic violence may be informed of the existence and terms of such protection order.
  3. A protection order shall remain in effect for the term set by the court or until terminated by the court. A protection order may, upon motion and upon good cause shown, be renewed for additional terms not to exceed one (1) year each if the requirements of this chapter are met. The motion to renew an order may be granted without a hearing, if not timely objected to by the party against whom the order was entered. If the petitioner voluntarily and without duress consents to the waiver of any portion of the protection order vis-a-vis the respondent pursuant to section 39-6313, Idaho Code, the order may be modified by the court.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6311, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1989, ch. 136, § 6, p. 305; am. 1990, ch. 293, § 1, p. 813; am. 1991, ch. 300, § 2, p. 787; am. 1995, ch. 357, § 2, p. 1212; am. 1996, ch. 362, § 1, p. 1218; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 6, p. 388; am. 2002, ch. 213, § 6, p. 587; am. 2013, ch. 187, § 6, p. 447.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho public safety and security information system,§ 19-5201 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2013 amendment, by ch. 187, substituted “Idaho public safety and security information system” for “Idaho law enforcement telecommunications system” in the section heading and throughout the section.

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Whiteley, 124 Idaho 261, 858 P.2d 800 (Ct. App. 1993).

§ 39-6312. Violation of order — Penalties.

  1. Whenever a protection order is granted and the respondent or person to be restrained had notice of the order, a violation of the provisions of the order or of a provision excluding the person from a residence shall be a misdemeanor punishable by not to exceed one (l) year in jail and a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), ten dollars ($10.00) of which shall be deposited to the credit of the domestic violence project account created in section 39-5212, Idaho Code.
  2. A peace officer may arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order, if the person restrained had notice of the order.
  3. The person against whom a protection order has been issued by an out-of-state court is presumed to have notice of the order if the victim presents to the officer proof of service of the order.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6312, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1990, ch. 234, § 3, p. 667; am. 1991, ch. 169, § 1, p. 409; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 7, p. 388.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

CASE NOTES

Arrest Following Violation of Order.

Police officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for false arrest claims brought against them where they could not have reasonably believed that the arrest complied with the Fourth Amendment since any reasonably competent officer would have ascertained the terms of the protection order before making the arrest for failing to comply with it. Beier v. City of Lewiston, 354 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2004), overruled on other grounds, City of Los Angeles v. Mendez, 137 S. Ct. 1539, 198 L. Ed. 2d 52 (2017).

Order Not Violates.
Search Following Violation of Order.

Defendant who was served with a protection order, stating that he was not to “harass, annoy, [or] disturb the peace of” his former wife and her children, did not violate that order by subsequently having the electrical power turned off to a home that he owned and that the ex-wife and children lived in. State v. Pierce, 159 Idaho 661, 365 P.3d 417 (Ct. App. 2015). Search Following Violation of Order.

Where defendant’s arrest was legal on the basis of his violation of a civil protection order (CPO), and where defendant consented to a search of his duffel bag immediately following his arrest, the evidence found in the duffel bag as a result of the search was properly admissible. State v. Whiteley, 124 Idaho 261, 858 P.2d 800 (Ct. App. 1993).

§ 39-6313. Order — Modification — Transmittal.

Upon application with notice to all parties and after a hearing, the court may modify the terms of an existing protection order. In any situation where an order is terminated or modified before its expiration date, the clerk of the court shall forward on or before the next judicial day a true copy of the modified order or the termination order to the appropriate law enforcement agency specified in the modification or termination order. Upon receipt of the order, the law enforcement agency shall promptly enter it in the Idaho law enforcement telecommunications system [public safety and security information system].

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6313, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in the last sentence was added by the compiler to update the name of the referenced system. See§ 19-5201 et seq.

§ 39-6314. Peace officers — Immunity.

No peace officer may be held criminally or civilly liable for actions or omissions in the performance of the duties of his office under this chapter, including the enforcement of out-of-state protection orders, if the peace officer acts in good faith and without malice.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6314, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1999, ch. 330, § 8, p. 388.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 9 of S.L. 1999, ch. 330 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 1999.

§ 39-6315. Proceedings additional.

Any proceedings under this chapter are in addition to other civil or criminal remedies.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6315, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

§ 39-6316. Law enforcement officers — Training, powers, duties.

  1. All training provided by the peace officers standards and training academy relating to the handling of domestic violence complaints by law enforcement officers shall stress enforcement of criminal laws in domestic situations, availability of community resources, and protection of the victim. Law enforcement agencies and community organizations with expertise in the issue of domestic violence shall cooperate in all aspects of such training.
  2. When a peace officer responds to a domestic violence call, the officer shall give a written statement to victims which alerts the victim to the availability of a shelter or other resources in the community, and give the victim a written notice provided by the Idaho state police substantially stating the following:
  3. The peace officer shall make every effort to arrange, offer, or facilitate transportation for the victim to a hospital for treatment of injuries or to a place of safety or shelter.
  4. The law enforcement agency shall forward the offense report to the appropriate prosecutor within ten (10) days of making such report if there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed, unless the case is under active investigation.

IF YOU ARE THE VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, you can ask the city or county prosecuting attorney to file a criminal complaint. You also have the right to file a petition in magistrate court requesting an order for protection from domestic abuse which could include any of the following: (a) an order restraining your abuser from further acts of abuse; (b) an order directing your abuser to leave your household; (c) an order preventing your abuser from entering your residence, school, business, or place of employment; (d) an order awarding you or the other parent custody of or visitation with your minor child or children; and (e) an order restraining your abuser from molesting or interfering with minor children in your custody. The forms you need to obtain a protection order are available from the clerk of the district court. The resources available in this community for information relating to domestic violence, treatment of injuries and places of safety and shelters are: (For safety reasons, inclusion of shelter/safe house addresses is not necessary). You also have the right to sue for losses suffered as a result of the abuse, including medical and moving expenses, loss of earnings or support, and other out-of-pocket expenses for injuries sustained and damage to your property. This can be done without an attorney in small claims court if the total amount claimed is less than five thousand dollars ($5,000).

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6316, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013; am. 1990, ch. 234, § 4, p. 667; am. 1992, ch. 74, § 4, p. 210; am. 2000, ch. 250, § 12, p. 702; am. 2000, ch. 469, § 100, p. 1450; am. 2006, ch. 263, § 5, p. 815.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Peace officers standards and training council,§ 19-5101 et seq.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2000 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 250, § 12, in the first paragraph of subsection (2), substituted “alerts the victim” for “alert the victim” and substituted “four thousand dollars ($4,000)” for “three thousand dollars ($3,000)” at the end of subsection (2).

The 2000 amendment, by ch. 469, § 100, in the first paragraph of subsection (2), substituted “Idaho state police” for “department of law enforcement” and substituted “is not necessary” for “are not necessary” within the parenthetical phrase in the second paragraph of subsection (2).

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 263, substituted “five thousand dollars ($5,000)” for “four thousand dollars ($4,000)” at the end of the sample notice in subsection (2).

Compiler’s Notes.

The amendment by S.L. 2000, ch. 250, § 12, applies to all actions filed on and after January 1, 2001, pursuant to S.L. 2000, ch. 250, § 13.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-6317. Severability.

The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of remaining portions of this act.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6317, as added by 1988, ch. 341, § 1, p. 1013.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 1988, ch. 341, which is codified as§§ 39-6301 to 39-6306 and 39-6307 to 39-6317.

§ 39-6318. Order for transfer of wireless telephone service.

  1. In order to ensure that a requesting party can maintain an existing wireless telephone number and the wireless numbers of any minor children in the care of the requesting party, a court may issue an order, after notice and a hearing, directing a wireless telephone service provider to transfer the billing responsibility for and rights to the wireless telephone number or numbers to the requesting party, if the requesting party is not the account holder.
    1. The order transferring billing responsibility for and rights to the wireless telephone number or numbers to a requesting party shall be a separate order that is directed to the wireless telephone service provider. The order shall list the name and billing telephone number of the account holder, the name and contact information of the person to whom the telephone number or numbers will be transferred and each telephone number to be transferred to that person. The court shall ensure that the contact information of the requesting party is not provided to the account holder. (2)(a) The order transferring billing responsibility for and rights to the wireless telephone number or numbers to a requesting party shall be a separate order that is directed to the wireless telephone service provider. The order shall list the name and billing telephone number of the account holder, the name and contact information of the person to whom the telephone number or numbers will be transferred and each telephone number to be transferred to that person. The court shall ensure that the contact information of the requesting party is not provided to the account holder.
    2. The order shall be served on the wireless service provider’s agent for service of process listed with the secretary of state.
    3. Where the wireless service provider cannot operationally or technically effectuate the order due to certain circumstances including, but not limited to, any of the following, the wireless service provider shall notify the requesting party when:
      1. The account holder has already terminated the account;
      2. Differences in network technology prevent the functionality of a device on the network; or
      3. There are geographic or other limitations on network or service availability.
    1. Upon transfer of billing responsibility for and rights to a wireless telephone number or numbers to a requesting party, pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, by a wireless telephone service provider, the requesting party shall assume all financial responsibility for the transferred wireless telephone number or numbers, monthly service costs and costs for any mobile device associated with the wireless telephone number or numbers. (3)(a) Upon transfer of billing responsibility for and rights to a wireless telephone number or numbers to a requesting party, pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, by a wireless telephone service provider, the requesting party shall assume all financial responsibility for the transferred wireless telephone number or numbers, monthly service costs and costs for any mobile device associated with the wireless telephone number or numbers.
    2. This section shall not preclude a wireless service provider from applying any routine and customary requirements for account establishment to the requesting party as part of this transfer of billing responsibility for a wireless telephone number or numbers and any devices attached to that number or numbers including, but not limited to, identification, financial information and customer preferences.
  2. This section shall not affect the ability of the court to apportion the assets and debts of the parties as provided for in law or the ability to determine the temporary use, possession and control of personal property.
  3. No cause of action shall lie against any wireless telephone service provider, its officers, employees or agents for actions taken in accordance with the terms of a court order issued pursuant to the provisions of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6318, as added by 2018, ch. 227, § 2, p. 518.

STATUTORY NOTES

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 2018, ch. 227 provided: “Legislative Intent. It is the intent of the Legislature to allow a victim of domestic violence to retain the use of an existing wireless telephone number and access to the contacts and other information that may be contained in an existing wireless telephone. For many victims of domestic violence, a wireless telephone is a lifeline to the community resources, the life-saving services and the support networks victims need in order to leave a batterer and an abusive environment. Many victims require access to a wireless telephone to obtain counseling services and legal assistance, such as securing a protection order. For these victims, a wireless telephone serves as a critical tool for making appointments and communicating with advocates. This can be a problem if the domestic violence victim is not the account holder for the wireless telephone, as only an account holder has the authority to release the telephone number or numbers contained in the account.”

Chapter 64 CLEAN LAKES ACT

Sec.

§ 39-6401. Legislative intent. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6401, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6402. Definitions. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6402, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6403. Declaration of policies and purposes. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6403, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6404. Establishment of a regional clean lakes coordinating council. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6404, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 55, p. 253.

§ 39-6405. Membership. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6405, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6406. Public advisory committee. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6406, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6407. Technical advisory group. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6407, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 56, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

S.L. 2010, ch. 279, § 1 purported to amend this section. However, S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1 repealed§§ 39-6401 through 39-6413. Therefore, the amendment of this section was not compiled.

§ 39-6408. Duties of the regional council. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6408, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6409. Responsibilities. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6409, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6410. Lake management plans. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6410, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6411. Moneys. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6411, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

§ 39-6412. Organization. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6412, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953; am. 1993, ch. 387, § 8, p. 1417.

§ 39-6413. Quorum. [Repealed.]

Repealed by S.L. 2010, ch. 59, § 1, effective July 1, 2010.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6413, as added by 1989, ch. 383, § 1, p. 953.

Chapter 65 WASTE TIRE DISPOSAL

Sec.

§ 39-6501. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “City” means the city where the waste tire storage site is located.
  2. “County” means the county where the waste tire storage site is located.
  3. “Department” means the department of environmental quality.
  4. “Dispose” means to drop, deposit, dump, spill or permanently place any waste tire onto or under the ground or into the waters of this state, or to own or control property where waste tires are dropped, deposited, dumped, spilled or permanently placed onto or under the ground or into the waters of this state.
  5. “Existing waste tire storage site” means any property storing waste tires prior to recycle, reuse, or final disposal as of July 1, 2003, regardless of whether the owner or operator possesses a permit or other written city or county authorization authorizing the storage of waste tires at the property.
  6. “Mining waste tire” means a waste tire which is greater than fifty-four (54) inches in diameter which was used in mining operations. Mining waste tires may be disposed of by burial. The department of lands shall prepare guidelines to govern the burial of mining waste tires.
  7. “Motor vehicle” means any automobile, motorcycle, truck, trailer, semitrailer, truck tractor and semitrailer combination or other vehicle operated on the roads of this state, used to transport persons or property and propelled by power other than muscular power, but motor vehicle does not include bicycles.
  8. “New waste tire storage site” means any property that is not storing waste tires as of July 1, 2003, and applies for and receives a permit or other written city or county authorization to store waste tires prior to recycle, reuse or final disposal on or after July 1, 2003.
  9. “Operator” means any person presently, or who was during any period of waste tire storage or disposal, in control of, or having responsibility for a waste tire storage site or a waste tire disposal site.
  10. “Owner” means a person who owned a waste tire storage site or disposal site at any time waste tires are stored or disposed at the property, and the current owner of the waste tire storage site or waste tire disposal site.
  11. “Person” means an individual, public or private corporation, partnership, association, firm, joint stock company, joint venture, trust, estate, municipality, commission, political subdivision of the state, state or federal agency, department or instrumentality, special district, interstate body or any legal entity, which is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties.
  12. “Retail tire dealer” means any person actively engaged in the business of selling new, used, or retread replacement tires at the retail level.
  13. “Store” or “storage” means to accumulate more than two hundred (200) waste tires at any time, in a manner that does not constitute final disposal at a waste tire disposal site, or to own or control property on which more than two hundred (200) waste tires accumulate at any given time, in a manner that does not constitute final disposal at a waste tire disposal site. The following activities shall not constitute “storing” or “storage” of waste tires:
    1. A retail tire dealer collecting less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) waste tires at any point in time for each retail business location.
    2. A tire retreader collecting less than three thousand (3,000) waste tires at any point in time for each individual retread operation so long as the waste tires are of the type the retreader is actively retreading.
    3. A wrecking salvage business collecting less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) waste tires for each retail business location.
    4. A waste tire disposal site collecting waste tires for disposal at the site in accordance with the site’s approved operating plan.
    5. A wholesale tire dealer collecting less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) waste tires at any point in time for each wholesale business location.
    6. An approved solid waste transfer station or solid waste landfill collecting less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) waste tires prior to transfer to an approved waste tire storage or disposal site.
    7. A farm or livestock operation which utilizes waste tires to secure farm or livestock silage or wastes provided the total number of waste tires shall not exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500).
    8. A permitted facility storing tires for an approved beneficial use.
  14. “Tire” has the meaning provided in section 49-121, Idaho Code.
  15. “Tire retreader” means any person actively engaged in the business of retreading tires by scarifying the surface to remove the old surface tread and attaching a new tread to make a usable tire.
  16. “Transport” or “transporting” means picking up or hauling waste tires.
  17. “Waste tire” means a motor vehicle tire originally used for operation of a vehicle on a public roadway which is no longer suitable for its original intended purpose because of wear, damage or defect.
  18. “Waste tire storage site” means a new or existing waste tire storage site.
  19. “Waste tire disposal site” means a public or private municipal solid waste landfill operating in compliance with section 39-6503, Idaho Code.
  20. “Wholesale tire dealer” means any person engaged in the business of selling new replacement tires to tire retailers.
  21. “Wrecking salvage business” means any establishment or place of business which is maintained, used, or operated, for storing, keeping, buying, or selling wrecked, scrapped, ruined, or dismantled motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6501, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 1, p. 1372; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 57, p. 253; am. 2003, ch. 281, § 1, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-101 et seq.

Department of lands,§ 58-101 et seq.

§ 39-6502. Waste tire storage sites.

  1. No person shall store waste tires on any public or private property in this state or in the waters of this state unless the property is a waste tire storage site as defined or otherwise exempted in this chapter.
  2. Permit or local authorization required. No person shall own or operate a waste tire storage site without a permit or other written county or city authorization, as follows:
    1. Counties and cities shall only issue permits or other written authorizations that contain terms and conditions that assure waste tire storage sites are operated in compliance with this chapter and any additional requirements the county or city deems appropriate. Counties and cities shall review waste tire storage site applications pursuant to the procedures contained in section 67-6512, Idaho Code.
    2. Existing waste tire storage sites.
      1. Within three (3) months of the effective date of this chapter, the owner or operator of an existing site that is:
        1. Operating without a permit or other written local authorization on the effective date of this chapter, shall apply to the respective county or city jurisdiction for approval to operate the existing site via an approved permit or other written city or county authorization; or
        2. Operating with a previously issued permit or other written city or county authorization on the effective date of this chapter, shall notify the respective county or city jurisdiction.
      2. If an existing waste tire storage facility fails to submit to the county or city an application by October 1, 2003, the existing waste tire storage site shall cease storing waste tires by January 1, 2004.
      3. If the county or city determines not to issue a permit, other written authorization, or a modification to an existing permit or approval, for the existing waste tire storage site, the existing waste tire storage site shall cease storing waste tires no later than three (3) months after receiving notice of the determination not to issue a permit, other written authorization, or modification for the site.
      4. The current owner or operator of a new waste tire storage site shall comply with the financial assurance requirement of this section prior to commencing waste tire storage at the site.
    3. New waste tire storage sites. The current owner or operator of a new waste tire storage site shall not commence waste tire storage at the site until the county or city issues a permit or other written authorization permitting waste tire storage.
    4. Counties and cities shall issue permits and other written local authorizations for waste tire storage sites.
    5. Financial assurance. The owner or operator of a waste tire storage site shall maintain financial assurance in the form of a cash bond payable to the county or city, in an amount acceptable to the county or city where the waste tire storage site is located; provided however, counties and cities shall require a minimum initial financial assurance of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per tire authorized to be stored at the site. The amount of financial assurance shall be adjusted each year in accordance with the consumer price index on the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit or other city or county written authorization. Failure to adjust the amount of financial assurance on the anniversary date each year shall constitute failure to comply with the provisions of this chapter and shall result in automatic revocation of the permit or other written city or county authorization and forfeiture of the bond. Cities and counties shall only process an application submitted under this section when documentation submitted with the application establishes compliance with the financial assurance requirement of this paragraph. (i) The current owner or operator of an existing waste tire storage site shall comply with the financial assurance requirement of this paragraph by October 1, 2003. Except that the owner or operator of the existing waste tire storage site located in the magic valley as provided by rule of the department shall comply with the financial assurance requirement of this paragraph by July 1, 2005.
    6. Siting. Counties and cities shall only issue a permit or written authorization to a waste tire storage site when the application establishes that the proposed or existing site is located on property owned as exclusively for industrial use.
    7. Application processing fee. Counties and cities may charge a fee for processing a waste tire storage site permit or authorization application or renewal.
    8. Records. Owners and operators of a waste tire storage site shall record and maintain on-site for a period of three (3) years, operational records including, but not limited to, the daily quantity of tires transported to and from the site, and the estimated quantity of tires located at the site.
    9. Suspension, revocation, renewal of permit or written authorization. The county or city may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a waste tire storage site’s permit or written authorization if the county or city determines that the site is operating in violation of any requirement of this section or any term or condition of the site’s permit or written authorization.
  3. In the event the current owner or operator of an existing or new waste tire storage site fails to comply with the requirements of this section, the board of county commissioners or city council may declare the site a public nuisance; and may declare a public health or safety emergency based on potential fire hazard, threat of insect borne disease, or potential contamination of the state’s ground or surface waters. If the respective governing authority has declared a public health or safety emergency, they may petition the board of examiners for, and the board of examiners may authorize, the issuance of deficiency warrants for the purpose of removing and properly disposing of the tires upon the recommendation of the state fire marshal in the event of fire hazard, or the district health department in the event of insect borne disease hazard, or the department in the event of ground or surface water contamination hazard.
    1. Upon authorization of deficiency warrants by the board of examiners in accordance with provisions of this section, the state controller shall, after notice to the state treasurer, draw deficiency warrants in the authorized amounts against the general fund.
    2. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to change or impair any right of recovery or subrogation arising under any other provision of law.

Upon written request from the city council or board of county commissioners to the department, the department shall be responsible for the permitting and authorization requirements of this section with respect to any application submitted to the county or city, in lieu of the county or city.

Upon written request from the city council or board of county commissioners to the department, the cash bond will be written in favor of the department, in lieu of the city or county. In such cases, the department will oversee use of the bond should two (2) owners or operators become liable on the bond obligation.

History.

(c) The attorney general shall act to fully recover all costs incurred by the state of Idaho and its political subdivisions pursuant to this section. History.

I.C.,§ 39-6502, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 3, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1001 et seq.

State board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§ 41-254.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6502, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6502, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 2, p. 1372, was repealed by § 2 of S.L. 1991, ch. 308, as amended by § 8 of S.L. 1993, ch. 375, effective July 1, 1996.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this chapter” in paragraph (2)(b) refers to the effective date of S.L. 2003, ch. 281, which was July 1, 2003.

§ 39-6503. Waste tire disposal.

  1. No person shall dispose of waste tires on any public or private property in this state or in the waters of this state except at permitted public or private municipal solid waste landfills which have been approved to accept waste tires in their operating plans as specified in the following subsection.
  2. Waste tires may be disposed at a permitted public or private municipal solid waste landfill with an approved operating plan only if the waste tires have been processed to meet the following criteria:
    1. The volume of one hundred (100) unprepared randomly selected whole tires in one (1) continuous test period must be reduced by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the original volume as specified in subsection (3) of this section. No single void space greater than one hundred twenty-five (125) cubic inches may remain in the randomly placed processed tires; or
    2. The tires shall be reduced to an average chip size no greater than sixty-four (64) square inches in any randomly selected sample of ten (10) tires or more. No more than forty percent (40%) of the chips may exceed sixty-four (64) square inches.
  3. Tire volumes shall be calculated as follows:
    1. Unprocessed whole tire volume shall be calculated by randomly placing one hundred (100) unprepared randomly selected whole tires in a rectangular container and multiplying the depth of unprocessed tires by the bottom area of the container.
    2. Processed tire volume shall be determined by randomly placing the processed tire test quantity in a rectangular container and leveling the surface. It shall be calculated by multiplying the depth of processed tires by the bottom area of the container.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6503, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 4, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6503, comprising I.C.,§ 39-6503, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 3, p. 1372; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 58, p. 253, was repealed by S.L. 2003, ch. 281, § 2, p. 758.

§ 39-6504. Transport of waste tires.

  1. No person shall transport waste tires for storage to any location in this state other than to a waste tire storage site for which a city or county has issued a permit or other written county or city authorization in active status.
  2. No person shall transport waste tires for disposal to any location in this state other than to a municipal solid waste landfill which is operating in compliance with the requirements of section 39-6503, Idaho Code.
  3. Nothing in this section shall prohibit any person from transporting waste tires to facilities in the state which possess a valid air quality permit, provided the permit allows for an approved beneficial use of the waste tires.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6504, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 5, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6504, comprising I.C.,§ 39-6504, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 4, p. 1372; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 59, p. 253 was repealed by S.L. 2003, ch. 281, § 2, p. 758.

§ 39-6505. Prohibited acts.

No person shall advertise or represent himself/herself as being in the business of accepting waste tires for transport, storage, or disposal without being in full compliance with all the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6505, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 6, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6505, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-6505, as added by S.L. 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808 as amended by S.L. 1993, ch. 375, § 5, p. 1372 and was repealed by S.L. 1991, ch. 308, §§ 2 and 3.

§ 39-6506. Recycling and reuse of waste tires.

The state of Idaho seeks to protect human health and the environment by encouraging the recycling and reuse of waste tires. Accordingly, the legislature directs the department to identify approved methods of recycling and reuse of waste tires.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6506, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 7, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-6506, comprising I.C.,§ 39-6506, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 6, p. 1372; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 60, p. 253, was repealed by S.L. 2003, ch. 281, § 2, p. 758.

§ 39-6507. Penalties.

Any person who knowingly stores, transports or disposes of a tire in violation of the provisions of this chapter is subject to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) per violation and is subject to the provisions of the environmental protection and health act contained in section 39-108, Idaho Code. Each tire so disposed of improperly constitutes a separate violation.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6507, as added by 1991, ch. 308, § 1, p. 808; am. 1993, ch. 375, § 7, p. 1372; am. 2003, ch. 281, § 8, p. 758.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 3 of S.L. 1991, ch. 308 as amended by § 8 of S.L. 1993, ch. 375 read: “Section 1 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1991. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1996. Any moneys in the Waste Tire Grant Account which are unexpended or unencumbered on June 30, 1996, shall be transmitted to the state highway account.”

§ 39-6508. Purpose.

The state of Idaho supports and encourages the reuse and recycling of waste tires. The legislature finds the paramount public interest in regulating waste tires is to protect public health and safety. In particular, the legislature is concerned with eliminating potential fire hazards; minimizing or eliminating potential breeding grounds for disease-bearing insects; and eliminating potential sources of surface and ground water contamination.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6508, as added by 2003, ch. 281, § 9, p. 758.

Chapter 66 BIG PAYETTE LAKE WATER QUALITY ACT

Sec.

§ 39-6601. Legislative intent.

The legislature finds that the waters of Big Payette Lake and its watershed are threatened with deterioration due to expanding residential development, greater public use and growing land use activities, that these pressures may endanger the drinkability, economic potential, fisheries, natural beauty, recreational use, swimability and wildlife values of the lake; that the state holds all such public lakes in trust for the use of all its citizens; that to preserve and protect such public lakes and to increase and enhance the use and enjoyment of such lakes is in the best interest of all the citizens of the state; that natural lakes form an important basis of the state’s economy and that the increasing demand upon the lake waters of this state require coordinated state and local action to protect, preserve and improve the water qualify [quality] of the lakes.

The legislature declares that it is necessary to embark upon a program of water quality protection for the lake so that future generations of Idahoans may use and enjoy it. This act creates a program to protect, preserve and, where necessary, improve the water quality of the lake while accommodating private, public and commercial activities to the extent prudent and practicable. The program as set forth in this act shall require a working partnership of federal, state and local agencies.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6601, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion near the end of the first paragraph was added by the compiler to supply the probable intended word.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 1993, ch. 200, which is codified as§§ 39-6601 to 39-6612.

§ 39-6602. Definitions.

Whenever used in this chapter:

  1. “Citizens committee” means the committee named by the council consisting of members of the public.
  2. “Council” means the “Big Payette Lake Water Quality Council” established in this chapter.
  3. “Lake” means the Big Payette Lake and its watershed which shall include all tributaries, and small lakes on those tributaries, to the North Fork of the Payette River above Big Payette Lake. The term “lake” shall also include all tributaries, and small lakes on those tributaries, that drain directly into Big Payette Lake before the dam on the North Fork of the Payette Lake as it leaves Big Payette Lake.
  4. “Plan” means the comprehensive water quality management plan for the lake to be developed after the initial study, and as modified over time.
  5. “Pollution” means water pollution as defined in section 39-103, Idaho Code.
  6. “Program” means all the actions to be performed by the council pursuant to this chapter.
  7. “Study” means the comprehensive, scientifically-based study of water quality in the lake.
  8. “Technical committee” means the advisory committee named by the council pursuant to this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6602, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

§ 39-6603. Establishment of the Big Payette Lake water quality council.

There is hereby created a Big Payette Lake water quality council for the lake. It shall be the responsibility of the council to develop and implement the program created in this chapter. The council shall be assisted in carrying out its responsibilities by the department of environmental quality, the local public health district and other appropriate state and local agencies as needed.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6603, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 61, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-101 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6604. Declaration of policies and purposes.

The council shall develop and implement a program that includes:

  1. The assembly of all historical data on water quality studies in the lake.
  2. An assessment of present and projected land and water uses related to the lake.
  3. The performance of a comprehensive, scientifically-based study of water quality in the lake. This study will include, but not be limited to, all point and nonpoint sources of nutrients, bacteria, sediments and potential pollution.
  4. The continued collection of important data after the initial study is completed as required by and for use in a nutrient load/lake response predictive model which shall be developed as part of the initial study.
  5. The preparation of a water quality management plan upon completion of the initial study, such plan to be updated regularly as new knowledge becomes available.
  6. The submittal of such plan to the legislature which shall accept, modify or reject the plan. The council will assist and coordinate the implementation of the accepted plan with federal, state and local authorities for seven (7) years after acceptance, after which the council and its committees will disband and be succeeded by appropriate multiagency oversight of the plan, its modification, and maintenance of the nutrient load/lake response predictive model. The city council of McCall and the Valley county commission may establish appropriate public committees to advise in matters related to the implementation of the plan on a continuing basis.
  7. An active public participation program with stakeholders and other interested parties in the design of the study, and the preparation and implementation of the plan, from the beginning of the council’s activities and until its disbandment. This program shall include regular reports to the public through forums, printed material and otherwise of lake conditions, findings of the study and progress in the development and implementation of the plan.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6604, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550; am. 2000, ch. 27, § 1, p. 52.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6605. Membership.

The council shall consist of nine (9) members appointed by the governor. The governor shall appoint one (1) member who shall be a Valley county commissioner at the time of their appointment, one (1) member who shall be an elected member of the McCall city government at the time of their appointment, one (1) local resident to represent sporting interests in the area, one (1) member to represent lumbering interests in the watershed, one (1) member to represent commercial interests in Valley county, and four (4) members at large who are full or part-time residents of Valley county. The terms of the members shall be three (3) years with the initial term to be staggered in terms of one (1), two (2), and three (3) years by the governor when he makes the appointment. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment of the governor upon recommendation of the council. A majority of the members of the council must maintain their primary residence in Valley county. Once established, the council will convene to adopt rules for its operation.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6605, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6606. Duties of council.

The council shall have the following duties:

  1. To coordinate activities related to the study of water quality in the lake, the development of a water quality management plan, and the implementation of that plan until disbandment as provided herein.
  2. To conduct a public awareness program to educate the general public on methods and responsibilities to protect the lake.
  3. To make an examination, as the council deems necessary, of environmental conditions in, upon and around the lake. The objective shall be to obtain a scientifically sound baseline study for planning future action by appropriate authorities.
  4. To undertake and complete a management plan with recommendations for the lake based upon such examination and study. The plan to be prepared shall specifically identify and address lake protection concerns upon the lake and within the surrounding watershed where land use, scenic values, water uses, residential development, wildlife habitat, fisheries, industry, commerce and other forms of human activity are both influenced by the lake and may reasonably be expected to significantly impact the water quality of the lake.
  5. To promote, until disbandment, the implementation of the plan by serving in an advisory capacity to those city, planning and zoning, county, state and federal authorities with responsibilities affecting lake management or lake water quality. The council may recommend, as appropriate, the adoption of any statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations needed to implement the plan.
  6. To consult with the public and keep the public informed through public forums and written reports of all activities of the council.
  7. The duties of the council are ongoing and continuous until its disbandment. The council shall have the authority to complete the examination and study and prepare the plan complete with recommendations for the lake and its tributaries.
  8. The council and all its committees will automatically disband seven (7) years after the plan, as and/or if, modified, is adopted by the legislature. Before disbandment, the council shall assist local, city, state and federal authorities in the establishment of a multiagency oversight capability to succeed the council.
  9. The council shall not have any regulatory or enforcement powers.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6606, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550; am. 2000, ch. 27, § 2, p. 52.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6607. Organization.

  1. After appointment, the members of the council shall choose one (1) member as chairman of the council and shall elect a secretary and treasurer of the council who may or may not be members of the council. The secretary and the treasurer may be one (1) person. The secretary shall keep a record of all council proceedings, minutes of all meetings, certificates, contracts, bonds given by employees and all corporate acts which shall be open to inspection to all interested parties.
  2. The treasurer shall keep strict and accurate accounts of all money received by and disbursed for and on behalf of the council in permanent records. The treasurer shall prepare or cause to be prepared annual financial statements on a fiscal year basis ending June 30 of each year. Such financial statements shall be available for inspection by any citizen.
  3. Members of the council shall serve without compensation. No member shall receive any compensation as an employee of the council or otherwise, other than herein provided, and no member of the council shall be interested in any contract or transaction with the council except in his official representative capacity.
  4. It shall be the duty of the council to cause an audit to be made of all financial affairs of the council during each year ending June 30. A financial statement shall be certified by the person making such audit.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6607, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6608. Quorum.

  1. A majority of the members of the council shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the members present shall be required to take action with respect to any matter. The vote of each member shall be individually recorded.
  2. The council may in other respects adopt its own operating procedures, which procedures shall be made available for public review.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6608, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6609. Technical committee.

To assist in the development of its program, the council shall create a technical committee which may include, but is not exclusively limited to, designated representatives of the public health district, city and county planning or engineering departments, the county planning and zoning commission, the McCall water and sewer district, department of environmental quality, department of lands, department of fish and game, department of parks and recreation, department of water resources, state soil and water conservation commission, United States forest service, United States army corps of engineers, United States agricultural conservation and stabilization services, United States natural resources conservation service, United States geological survey, United States environmental protection agency and representatives proposed by interests in agriculture, environmental protection, forest products, sporting and mining. Indian tribes may nominate a representative for the technical committee. Members shall serve without state compensation except such normal compensation received by members who are state, city, county, district or federal employees serving in the normal course and scope of their employment.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6609, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 62, p. 253; am. 2010, ch. 279, § 27, p. 719.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 279, in the first sentence, substituted “state soil and water conservation commission” for “state soil conservation commission” and substituted “United States natural resources conservation service” for “United States soil conservation service.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6610. Citizens committee.

The council shall create a citizens committee comprised of citizens who express an interest in the council’s program for the lake, the study and the plan. Citizens performing volunteer services in support of the council’s program shall be automatic members of the citizens committee. Members of the citizens committee may meet with the council with full right to participate in all proceedings and discussions except that citizen committee members shall not be voting members.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6610, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

§ 39-6611. Lake management plan.

  1. When the council has received and accepted the study, it shall make the same available to all appropriate and interested city, county, health district, state and federal agencies and to any interested individual or affected lake agency or association. For a period of ninety (90) days after dissemination, any interested agency or person may submit written suggestions, comments or proposals for the lake management plan or recommendations to the council.
  2. The council shall thereafter prepare a lake management plan and recommendations which shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days after dissemination of the examination and baseline study.
  3. The council shall identify sources and types of pollution within the planning area and identify existing and potential programs and measures by which this pollution might be abated, and summarize the past successes of these efforts, including notable voids in funding, regulatory powers or interagency coordination.
  4. The council shall identify present and future water and land uses within the watershed and comment on the implication of these various uses on the lake.
  5. Once completed, the council shall provide copies of its plan and recommendations to all agencies, persons and associations who have indicated an interest in the examination and baseline study. The council shall thereupon provide for one (1) or more public hearings upon its lake management plan and recommendations with notice given as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  6. After receiving the information obtained at the public hearing(s), the council shall make such changes and revisions as it deems necessary and within thirty (30) days after such public hearing, but in no event later than the next regular session of the Idaho legislature, the council shall submit the plan to the legislature.
  7. The legislature shall, within the next regular session during or after which it receives the plan, accept, reject or modify the plan. Such accepted or modified plan shall have the force and effect of law.
  8. Thereafter, the council shall assist public and governmental authorities to adopt and enforce the provisions of the plan for which that authority has a responsibility. Before its disbandment, the council shall also assist these authorities to establish an ongoing joint-agency oversight responsibility for the plan and its recommendations.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6611, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality. The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-6612. Accounts.

  1. There is hereby created in the state treasury a dedicated fund known as the Payette Lake trust account. Moneys in the Payette Lake trust account may come from appropriations, grants, gifts, donations, use fees or such other sources as may be authorized by the legislature. Moneys in the account shall be exclusively for the development and implementation of the program. Moneys in the account may only be expended pursuant to appropriation, and then only as authorized by a resolution duly adopted by a majority of the council.
  2. There is hereby created in the state treasury a dedicated fund known as the Big Payette Lake water quality council administrative account. All money in the account is to be derived exclusively from private, nongovernmental funding sources. All money in the account is appropriated continuously to the council to be used exclusively to defray the costs of council administration. The account shall not be subject to the provisions of the standard appropriations act of 1945.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6612, as added by 1993, ch. 200, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Standard appropriations act of 1945,§ 67-3601 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The Big Payette Lake water quality council disbanded in March 2005 and was replaced by the Big Payette waterside advisory group, a committee of agencies and citizens overseen by the department of environmental quality.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1993, ch. 200 declared an emergency. Approved March 26, 1993.

Chapter 67 TREASURE VALLEY AND REGIONAL AIR QUALITY COUNCIL ACT

Sec.

§ 39-6701. Legislative statement of findings and intent.

  1. The legislature finds that the air quality in certain regions of the state is threatened with deterioration. This deterioration may endanger the breathability, economic potential, public health, natural beauty, recreational use and livability in various regions of the state. It is the intent of the legislature in establishing this chapter to preserve and protect the air quality of the entire state.
  2. The legislature declares that it is necessary to embark upon a program of air quality protection for future generations of Idahoans. This chapter establishes a treasure valley air quality council and also allows for the creation of regional air quality councils as necessary to protect, preserve and, where necessary, improve the quality of air in a specified geographical area while accommodating private, public and commercial activities. The plan developed by an air quality council as set forth in this chapter shall require a working partnership of state and local agencies of government as well as the private sector.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6701, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6702. Establishment of the Treasure Valley air quality council.

There is hereby established a Treasure Valley air quality council within the Idaho department of environmental quality. It shall be the responsibility of the council to develop a plan and carry out the duties established by this chapter. The council shall be assisted in its work by the department of environmental quality and other appropriate state and local agencies as needed.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6702, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-101 et seq.

§ 39-6703. Establishment of a regional air quality council — Petition.

  1. There is hereby authorized the establishment of regional air quality councils within the Idaho department of environmental quality.
  2. Any ten (10) persons living within the boundaries of a geographical area proposed for the establishment of a regional air quality council may file a petition with the board of environmental quality within the department of environmental quality requesting a regional air quality council be established. The petition shall set forth:
    1. The proposed name of the regional air quality council;
    2. The needs, in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, for such a council;
    3. The geographical boundaries of the territory proposed for development of a plan by a council; and
    4. A request that the board duly define the geographic boundaries for a council.
  3. Within thirty (30) days after such petition has been filed with the board, it shall cause due notice to be given of a proposed hearing upon the petition. After such hearing, if the board determines upon the facts presented at the hearing and upon such other relevant facts and information as may be available, that there is need in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, for the establishment of a regional air quality council, it shall approve the petition and shall make and record such approval. The board shall immediately as practicable notify the governor by forwarding a copy of the board’s approval to the governor. Within a reasonable time, but not to exceed ninety (90) days, the governor shall appoint members to that regional air quality council in accordance with the provisions of section 39-6708, Idaho Code.
  4. It shall be the responsibility of any council established under this chapter to develop a plan and carry out the duties established by this chapter. The council shall be assisted in its work by the department of environmental quality and other appropriate state and local agencies as needed.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6703, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of environmental quality,§ 39-107.

§ 39-6704. Establishment of a citizens committee.

Each council established under the provisions of this chapter shall create a citizens committee comprised of citizens who express an interest in the council’s purpose and work. Citizens performing volunteer services in support of the work of a council shall automatically be members of the citizens committee. Members of the citizens committee may meet with the council with full right to attend all proceedings and discussions and submit comments, except that citizen committee members shall not be voting members.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6704, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6705. Definitions.

Whenever used in this chapter:

  1. “Air pollution” means air pollution as defined in section 39-103, Idaho Code.
  2. “Air quality plan” means the comprehensive, air quality management plan for a specified regional area as developed and modified by a regional air quality council.
  3. “Citizens committee” means the committee consisting of members of the public created pursuant to section 39-6704, Idaho Code, by an air quality council established under the provisions of this chapter.
  4. “Council” means a regional air quality council established pursuant to this chapter.
  5. “Local governing agency” means a county or city government agency.
  6. “Specified regional area” means a county or counties, or a defined geographical area where air quality is threatened.
  7. “Study” means the comprehensive, scientifically-based study of air quality in a specified regional area including the study of air quality in the Treasure Valley.
  8. “Treasure Valley” means the geographic boundaries encompassed by Ada and Canyon counties.
  9. “Treasure Valley air quality council” means the regional air quality council established in section 39-6702, Idaho Code.
  10. “Treasure Valley air quality plan” means the comprehensive, air quality management plan for Ada and Canyon counties as developed and modified by the Treasure Valley air quality council.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6705, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6706. Declaration of policies and purposes.

The Treasure Valley air quality council, and any regional air quality council established pursuant to this chapter, shall develop and implement an air quality plan in accordance with the environmental protection and health act, sections 39-101 through 39-130, Idaho Code, that includes:

  1. The compilation of all historical data on air quality studies in the Treasure Valley, or in a specified regional area;
  2. An assessment of present and projected emissions related to the Treasure Valley, or related to a specified regional area;
  3. The completion of a comprehensive, scientifically-based study of air quality in the Treasure Valley, or in a specified regional area;
  4. A description of actions to be taken by governmental agencies and nongovernmental entities to protect, preserve and, when necessary, improve the air quality in the Treasure Valley, or in a specified regional area; and
  5. The submittal of an air quality management plan to the legislature which may reject the plan in whole or in part pursuant to a concurrent resolution. The Treasure Valley air quality council, and any regional air quality council established pursuant to this chapter, shall assist and coordinate the implementation of the accepted plan with federal, state and local authorities for seven (7) years after acceptance, after which the Treasure Valley air quality council, or any regional air quality council, and its committees shall disband.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6706, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (5) of this section, the Treasure Valley air quality council has disbanded.

§ 39-6707. Membership of the Treasure Valley air quality council.

  1. The Treasure Valley air quality council shall consist of fourteen (14) members appointed by the governor. The governor shall appoint one (1) member who shall be an Ada county commissioner; one (1) member who shall be a Canyon county commissioner; one (1) member who is an elected member of a city government in Ada county; one (1) member who is an elected member of a city government in Canyon county; two (2) members who represent agricultural interests in the Treasure Valley; two (2) members who represent commercial interests in the Treasure Valley; two (2) members from manufacturing or food processing industries located in the Treasure Valley; two (2) members from recognized Idaho environmental organizations; and two (2) members at large who are full-time residents of Ada or Canyon county.
  2. The terms of the members shall be three (3) years with the initial term to be staggered in terms of one (1), two (2), and three (3) years by the governor when he makes the original appointment.
  3. The governor shall designate one (1) member to serve as chair of the Treasure Valley air quality council.
  4. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment of the governor.
  5. All members of the Treasure Valley council shall maintain their primary residence in either Ada or Canyon county during the term of the member’s appointment.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6707, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6708. Membership of a regional air quality council.

  1. A council shall consist of fourteen (14) members appointed by the governor. The governor shall appoint two (2) members from each of the following categories: two (2) members who are county commissioners within the specified regional area; two (2) members who are at the time of appointment, elected members of a city government in the specified regional area; two (2) members who represent agricultural interests in the specified regional area; two (2) members who represent commercial interests in the specified regional area; two (2) members from industries located in the specified regional area; two (2) members from recognized Idaho environmental organizations; and two (2) members at large who are full-time residents of the specified regional area.
  2. The terms of the members shall be three (3) years with the initial term to be staggered in terms of one (1), two (2), and three (3) years by the governor when he makes the original appointments.
  3. The governor shall designate one (1) member to serve as chair of the council.
  4. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment of the governor.
  5. All members of a council shall maintain their primary residence in the specified regional area during the term of the member’s appointment.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6708, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6709. Duties of the Treasure Valley air quality council and any regional air quality council — Powers.

  1. The Treasure Valley air quality council, and any regional council established pursuant to this chapter, shall have the following duties:
    1. To coordinate activities related to the study of air quality, the development of an air quality plan for the area, and oversee the implementation of that plan.
    2. To conduct a public awareness program to educate the general public on methods and responsibilities to protect the air shed.
    3. To examine, as the Treasure Valley or regional council deems necessary, air quality conditions in, upon and around the Treasure Valley, or in, upon and around a specified regional area. The objective shall be to obtain a scientifically-sound baseline study for planning future action by appropriate federal, state and local government, and the private sectors.
    4. To promote, until dissolution, the implementation of the Treasure Valley air quality plan, or the air quality plan of a regional council, by serving in an advisory capacity to those local, state and federal government agencies with responsibilities affecting air quality. Any council may recommend, as appropriate, the adoption of any statutes, ordinances, policies and rules needed by such governmental agencies to implement the plan.
    5. To consult with the public and keep the public informed of activities of the council through public forums and written reports.
    6. To establish a citizens committee pursuant to section 39-6704, Idaho Code.
    7. To perform its duties continuously until its dissolution.
    8. Prior to the automatic dissolution of the council and all its committees seven (7) years after the council’s plan is adopted by the legislature, to assist local, state and federal agencies in the establishment of a multiagency oversight capability to succeed the council.
  2. A council shall not have any regulatory or enforcement powers.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6709, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6710. Quorum — Procedures.

  1. A majority of the members of the Treasure Valley air quality council, or a regional council, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the members present shall be required to take action with respect to any matter.
  2. The Treasure Valley air quality council, or a regional council, may adopt its own operating rules and procedures which shall be made available to the public.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6710, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6711. Treasure Valley air quality plan.

  1. The Treasure Valley air quality council shall complete a draft plan by July 1, 2006. It shall make the study available to all appropriate and interested local, state and federal agencies and to any interested persons. For a period of ninety (90) days after dissemination, any interested agency or person may submit written suggestions, comments or proposals for the plan, or recommendations to the council.
  2. The council shall thereafter prepare a final Treasure Valley air quality plan which shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days after dissemination of the study.
  3. The council shall identify in the plan all known present and future air issues in Ada and Canyon counties.
  4. Once completed, the council shall provide copies of its plan to all agencies and persons who have indicated an interest in the study. The council shall thereupon provide for one (1) or more public hearings upon its plan and recommendations with notice given as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  5. After receiving the information obtained at the public hearing, the council shall make such changes and revisions as it deems necessary and within thirty (30) days after such public hearing, but in no event later than the next regular session of the Idaho legislature, the council shall submit the plan to the legislature.
  6. The legislature may, within the next regular session during or after which it receives the plan, reject the plan in whole or in part by concurrent resolution.
  7. Thereafter, the council shall assist in the implementation of the provisions of the plan. Before its dissolution, the council shall also assist these local, state and federal agencies to establish an ongoing, joint-agency oversight responsibility for the plan.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6711, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6712. Implementation of the Treasure Valley air quality plan.

To the greatest extent practicable, all Idaho state and local government agencies shall implement the plan and its recommendations. In circumstances where any state or local government agency chooses not to so incorporate and implement any element of the plan, any such agency shall provide to the council in writing the reasons why such incorporation and implementation have not been adopted.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6712, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6713. Treasure Valley air quality trust fund.

There is hereby created in the state treasury a dedicated fund known as the “Treasure Valley Air Quality Trust Fund” which shall be referred to as the Treasure Valley fund. Moneys in the Treasure Valley fund may come from grants, gifts, donations, use fees or such other sources as may be authorized by the legislature. Moneys in the fund shall be used exclusively for the purpose of fulfillment of the statutorily-required duties of the Treasure Valley air quality council. Moneys in the fund may only be expended as authorized by a resolution duly adopted by a majority of the council.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6713, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6714. Air quality plan of a regional air quality council.

  1. A regional air quality council shall develop and accept the study within one (1) year after establishment of the council. It shall make the study available to all appropriate and interested local, state and federal agencies and to any interested persons. For a period of ninety (90) days after dissemination, any interested agency or person may submit written suggestions, comments or proposals for the plan, or recommendations to the council.
  2. The council shall thereafter prepare a final regional air quality plan which shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days after dissemination of the study.
  3. The council shall identify present and future air issues in the specified regional area.
  4. Once completed, the council shall provide copies of its plan to all agencies and persons who have indicated an interest in the study. The council shall thereupon provide for one (1) or more public hearings upon its plan and recommendations with notice given as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  5. After receiving the information obtained at the public hearing, the council shall make such changes and revisions as it deems necessary and within thirty (30) days after such public hearing, but in no event later than the next regular session of the Idaho legislature, the council shall submit the plan to the legislature.
  6. The legislature shall, within the next regular session during or after which it receives the plan, accept, reject or modify the plan by concurrent resolution.
  7. Thereafter, the council shall assist in the adoption and enforcement of the provisions of the plan. Before its dissolution, the council shall also assist these local, state and federal agencies to establish an ongoing, joint-agency oversight responsibility for the plan.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-6714, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6715. Implementation of a regional air quality plan.

To the greatest extent practicable, all Idaho state and local government agencies shall incorporate and implement the plan and its recommendations. In circumstances where any state or local government agency chooses not to implement any element of the plan, any such agency shall provide to the council a written explanation of its failure to implement that portion of the plan.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6715, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6716. Regional fund.

There is hereby created in the state treasury a dedicated fund known as the “Regional Air Quality Trust Fund” which shall be referred to as the regional fund. Moneys in the regional fund may come from grants, gifts, donations, use fees or such other sources as may be authorized by the legislature. Moneys in the fund shall be used exclusively for the purpose of fulfillment of the statutorily-required duties of a regional air quality council. Moneys in the fund may only be expended as authorized by a resolution duly adopted by a majority of a council.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6716, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616.

§ 39-6717. Savings clause.

Nothing in this chapter shall alter or affect the provisions of section 39-114, Idaho Code, on the open burning of crop residue.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-6717, as added by 2005, ch. 206, § 1, p. 616; am. 2008, ch. 71, § 5, p. 191.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2008 amendment, by ch. 71, substituted “section 39-114” for “chapter 48, title 22” and “on the open burning of crop residue” for “on smoke management and crop residue disposal.”

Effective Dates.

Section 6 of S.L. 2008, ch. 71 declared an emergency. Approved March 7, 2008.

Chapter 68, 69 [RESERVED]

Chapter 70 SALE AND DISPOSAL OF BATTERIES

Sec.

§ 39-7001. Definition of lead acid battery.

For the purpose of this chapter, “lead acid battery” means a battery with a core of elemental lead and a capacity of six (6) or more volts which is suitable for use in farm equipment, construction equipment, a motor vehicle or a boat. Batteries only suitable for motor cycles, off-road recreation vehicles or lawn and garden equipment are exempt from the fees in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7001, as added by 1991, ch. 292, § 1, p. 752.

§ 39-7002. Disposal of lead acid batteries.

  1. The disposal of lead acid batteries in landfills and the incineration of those batteries is prohibited. An owner or operator of a solid waste disposal facility shall not knowingly accept a lead acid battery for disposal unless the owner or operator is removing lead acid batteries from the waste stream for recycling. A lead acid battery shall be discarded or disposed of only as follows:
    1. A lead acid battery retailer or wholesaler may deliver a lead acid battery to any one (1) of the following:
      1. A permitted secondary lead smelter.
      2. A battery manufacturer.
      3. A collection or recycling facility authorized by the federal environmental protection agency or department of environmental quality.
      4. In the case of battery retailers only, an agent of a battery wholesaler.
      5. A landfill operator who offers collection services for recycling lead acid batteries.
  2. A person other than a lead acid battery retailer or wholesaler may deliver a lead acid battery to any of the following:
    1. A lead acid battery retailer or wholesaler.
    2. A permitted secondary lead smelter.
    3. A collection or recycling facility authorized by the federal environmental protection agency or the department of environmental quality.
    4. A landfill operator who offers collection services for recycling lead acid batteries.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7002, as added by 1991, ch. 292, § 1, p. 752; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 63, p. 253.

§ 39-7003. Sale of lead acid batteries — Fee — Notice.

  1. A lead acid battery seller shall accept from customers at the point of transfer used lead acid batteries of the type and quantity sold at that point of transfer and may accept additional batteries. A lead acid battery seller shall post a written notice which is clearly visible in the public sales area of the establishment and which contains the following language:
  2. Each person who purchases a new lead acid battery shall be assessed a fee of ten dollars ($10.00) per battery by the seller. A seller shall refund the ten dollar ($10.00) fee to any person who presents a used lead acid battery to the seller with a receipt for the purchase of a new battery from that seller within the thirty (30) day period immediately following the purchase. A seller may keep any lead acid battery fee moneys which are not properly claimed within thirty (30) days after the date of sale.
  3. All lead acid batteries sold after July 1, 1992, shall bear a universally accepted recycling symbol.
  4. An advertisement or other printed promotional material related to the sale of lead acid batteries shall contain the following notice in bold print:
  5. The provisions of this section do not apply to a person whose sales of batteries are not in the ordinary course of business.
  6. A wholesale seller of lead acid batteries who sells batteries to this state, to a political subdivision of this state or to a private entity which resells the batteries is not subject to the fees in this chapter.
  7. A person or entity who manufactures or sells equipment or vehicles, the final product of which includes a lead acid battery as a component part, is not subject to the fees in this chapter as long as the lead acid battery is attached to and is a component part of said equipment or vehicle.

“It is unlawful to dispose of a motor vehicle battery or other lead acid battery in a landfill or any unauthorized site.

Recycle all used batteries.”

The seller is required by law to accept used lead acid batteries. When any new lead acid battery is purchased, an additional fee of ten dollars ($10.00) will be charged unless a used battery is returned for refund within thirty (30) days.

“A fee is imposed on the purchase of each new lead acid battery unless a used battery is returned where applicable.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7003, as added by 1991, ch. 292, § 1, p. 752; am. 2009, ch. 172, § 1, p. 550.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.
Effective Dates.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 172, increased the fee amounts in subsections (1) and (2) from $5 to $10. Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2009, ch. 172 declared an emergency. Approved April 17, 2009.

§ 39-7004. Penalties.

  1. A person who improperly disposes of a battery in violation of the provisions of this chapter is subject to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) per violation and is subject to the penalty provisions of the environmental protection and health act contained in chapter 1, title 39, Idaho Code. Each battery which is so disposed of improperly constitutes a separate violation.
  2. A person who knowingly violates any provision of this chapter other than as described in subparagraph (1) of this section is subject to a civil penalty of not more than one hundred dollars ($100) per violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7004, as added by 1991, ch. 292, § 1, p. 752.

Chapter 71 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACT

Sec.

§ 39-7101. Short title.

This chapter may be known and cited as the “Idaho Hazardous Substance Response Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7101, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582.

§ 39-7102. Legislative findings and purposes.

  1. The legislature of the state of Idaho finds:
    1. That the state has a duty to protect the health, safety and welfare of the people of Idaho;
    2. That the protection and preservation of Idaho’s environment promotes the health, safety and welfare of her people;
    3. That the unexpected and uncontrolled releases or threat of releases of hazardous substances constitute a threat to the people and environment of Idaho; and
    4. That knowledgeable persons, governmental entities and organizations should be encouraged to lend expert assistance in the event of a hazardous substance incident.
  2. Therefore, it is hereby declared that the purposes of the provisions of this chapter are:
    1. To facilitate emergency response planning and coordination at a state and local level;
    2. To provide for the prompt response and containment of releases or threats of release of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances to include explosives and weapons of mass destruction;
    3. To provide liability for emergency response costs associated with responding to hazardous substances incidents;
    4. To encourage knowledgeable persons, governmental entities and organizations to lend assistance by providing them with limited immunity from civil liability; and
    5. To provide a mechanism for recovery of costs incurred by the state and local governments in responding to emergency hazardous substance incidents to be used in lieu of, and not in addition to, cost recovery mechanisms or claims for relief provided by applicable federal laws. By enacting this chapter, it is the intent of the legislature that the state and local governments elect to proceed in state courts under the provisions of this chapter and other provisions of state law rather than in federal court under federal laws, where necessary to recover emergency response costs. There is no provision for cost recovery for a hazardous substance incident response occurring on private property where the owner responds to the incident with the approval of the incident commander.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7102, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 1, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, in subsections (1)(c) and (2)(b), inserted “or threats of release” or similar language; in subsection (2)(b), inserted “or potentially hazardous” and added “to include explosives and weapons of mass destruction”; and, in subsection (2)(c), inserted “responding to.”

§ 39-7103. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Emergency” means a release or threat of release that, in the reasonable judgment of the local emergency response authority in consultation with the office, threatens immediate harm to the environment or the health and safety of any individual and that requires immediate action for the containment or control of a hazardous or potentially hazardous substance to prevent, minimize or mitigate harm to the public health, safety or the environment which may result if action is not taken.
  2. “Hazardous substance incident” means an emergency circumstance requiring a response by the state emergency response team or the local emergency response authority to monitor, assess and evaluate a release or threat of a release of a hazardous or potentially hazardous substance. A hazardous substance incident may require containment or confinement or both, but does not include site cleanup or remediation efforts after the incident commander has determined the emergency has ended.
  3. “Hazardous substance” means:
    1. Any “hazardous substance” within the scope of section 101(14) of the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601(14);
    2. Any hazardous substance within the scope of section 104 of the federal hazardous materials transportation act, 49 U.S.C. 1803, and the federal department of transportation regulations promulgated pursuant thereto;
    3. Any extremely hazardous substance within the scope of section 302 of the federal emergency planning and community right-to-know act, 42 U.S.C. 11002; and
    4. Any explosive or weapon of mass destruction utilized or threatened to be utilized in an act of terrorism, crime or other threat to public safety.
  4. “Incident commander” is the person in charge of all responders to a hazardous substance incident and who is identified in the Idaho hazardous materials emergency incident command and response plan or the private emergency response plan.
  5. “Local emergency response authority” means those persons designated under section 39-7105, Idaho Code, by the city, county, or the military division to be first responders to hazardous substance incidents.
  6. “Military division” means the military division of the office of the governor.
  7. “Office” means the Idaho office of emergency management within the military division.
  8. “Person” means any individual, public or private corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, firm, trust, estate, the United States or any department, institution, or agency thereof, the state or any department, institution, or agency thereof, any municipal corporation, county, city, or other political subdivision of the state, or any other legal entity whatsoever which is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties.
  9. “Potentially hazardous substance” means any substance which in the reasonable judgment of the local emergency response authority in consultation with the office is likely a hazardous substance.
  10. “Private emergency response plan” means a plan designed to respond to emergency releases of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances at a specific facility or under a specific set of conditions. (11) “Release” means any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, escaping, dumping or disposing of a hazardous or potentially hazardous substance, or the threat of the same, into the environment. “Release” does not include any discharge of a hazardous substance into the environment which is authorized by limits and conditions in a federal or state permit relating to the protection of public health or the environment so long as the permitted activity from which the release occurs is in compliance with applicable limits and conditions of the permit.

(12) “State emergency response team” means one (1) of the state emergency response teams authorized by the military division to respond to hazardous substance incidents.

(13) “Threat of release” means the release of a hazardous or potentially hazardous substance is likely.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7103, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 1, p. 357; am. 2004, ch. 58, § 1, p. 268; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 2, p. 844; am. 2016, ch. 118, § 3, p. 331.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho office of emergency management,§ 46-1004.

Military division,§ 67-802.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable, adding paragraph (4)(d) and subsections (9) and (13).

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 118, deleted former subsection (1), which read: “’Bureau’ means the bureau of homeland security within the military division”; redesignated former subsections (2) through (7) as present subsections (1) through (6); substituted “the office” for “the bureau” in present subsections (1) and (9); and added present subsection (7).

Federal References.

The reference to 49 U.S.C. 1803 in subsection (3)(b) should have been to 49 U.S.C. App. 1803, which was repealed in 1994. See now 49 USCS § 5103.

§ 39-7104. Military division — Powers and duties.

  1. The military division through the Idaho office of emergency management shall implement the provisions of this chapter and direct the activities of its staff and, in so doing, the military division may:
    1. Through the office, in accordance with the laws of the state, hire, fix the compensation, and prescribe the powers and duties of such other individuals, including consultants, emergency teams and committees, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
    2. Create and implement state emergency response teams that have appropriately trained personnel and necessary equipment to respond to hazardous substance incidents. The military division shall enter into a written agreement with each entity or person providing equipment or services to a designated emergency response team. The teams shall be available and may respond to hazardous substance incidents at the direction of the military division or its designee or local incident commander.
    3. Contract with persons to meet state emergency response needs for the teams and response authorities.
    4. Advise, consult and cooperate with agencies of the state and federal government, other states and their state agencies, cities, counties, tribal governments and other persons concerned with emergency response and matters relating to and arising out of hazardous substance incidents.
    5. Encourage, participate in, or conduct studies, investigations, training, research, and demonstrations for and with state emergency response teams, local emergency response authorities and other interested persons.
    6. Collect and disseminate information relating to emergency response to hazardous substance incidents.
    7. Accept and administer loans, grants, or other funds or gifts, conditional or otherwise, made to the state for emergency response activities provided for in this chapter.
    8. Submit an annual report prior to February 1 to the governor and to the legislature concerning emergency response to hazardous substance incidents.
    9. Prepare, coordinate, implement and update a statewide hazardous materials incident command and response plan that coordinates state and local emergency response authorities to respond to hazardous substance incidents within the state for approval by the legislature. The plan shall address radiation, explosive and weapons of mass destruction incidents. The Idaho hazardous materials incident command and response plan shall be consistent with and a part of the Idaho state disaster plan provided in section 46-1006, Idaho Code, after legislative approval.
  2. The military division shall have the powers and duties of a state emergency response commission under the federal emergency planning and community right-to-know act, 42 U.S.C. section 11001 et seq.
  3. The military division may promulgate rules and procedures to govern reimbursement of claims pursuant to this chapter.
  4. All state agencies and institutions will cooperate and provide staff assistance to the military division in carrying out its duties under this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7104, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 2, p. 357; am. 1998, ch. 99, § 1, p. 347; am. 2004, ch. 58, § 2, p. 268; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 3, p. 844; am. 2016, ch. 118, § 4, p. 331.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Military division,§ 67-802.

Idaho office of emergency management,§ 46-1004.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, inserted “explosive and weapons of mass destruction” in the second sentence in subsection (1)(i).

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 118, in subsection (1), substituted “Idaho office of emergency management” for “bureau of homeland security” in the introductory paragraph, and substituted “the office” for “the bureau” near the beginning of paragraph (a).

§ 39-7105. Local emergency response authorities — Designation.

  1. It is the purpose of the provisions of this section to provide for the designation of local emergency response authorities for hazardous substance incidents.
  2. Cities and counties shall designate the local emergency response authorities for hazardous substance incidents that occur within their respective jurisdictions. Cities and counties are encouraged to appoint a response authority whose members will become trained in hazardous substance incident response.
    1. The governing body of every city shall designate by ordinance or resolution a local emergency response authority for hazardous substance incidents occurring within the corporate limits of such city. A city may designate the county as its emergency response authority and participate in the county plan for hazardous substance incident response, and shall notify the county of that designation in writing.
    2. The board of county commissioners of every county in the state shall designate by ordinance or resolution a local emergency response authority for hazardous substance incidents occurring within the unincorporated area of such county.
    3. The governing body of every city and every board of county commissioners shall notify the military division and Idaho emergency medical services communications center of its designated local emergency response authority. Such notification shall be in writing and shall occur as soon as practicable, and, in any event, no later than sixty (60) calendar days after this chapter becomes effective. Thereafter, any changes in such designations shall be communicated to the military division and Idaho emergency medical services communications center no later than ten (10) working days before such change becomes effective.
    4. If no local emergency response authority having the ability to respond to a hazardous substance incident exists within a city or county or if such a political subdivision is unable to obtain the services of an emergency response authority by way of a mutual aid agreement, contract or otherwise, such city or county may petition the military division to designate an emergency response authority to respond to hazardous substance incidents within the petitioning political subdivision’s jurisdiction. The military division, in consultation with such political subdivision, may thereafter designate appropriate local emergency response authorities.
  3. If a hazardous substance incident occurs in an area in which no local emergency response authority has been designated, or if the Idaho state police has been designated as the local emergency response authority, the Idaho state police shall be the local emergency response authority for such hazardous substance incident for the purposes of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7105, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1995, ch. 116, § 24, p. 386; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 3, p. 357; am. 2000, ch. 469, § 101, p. 1450.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Emergency communications commission,§ 31-4815. Idaho state police,§ 67-2901 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “this chapter becomes effective” in paragraph (2)(c) refers to the effective date of this chapter, as enacted by S.L. 1991, ch. 242, which was April 4, 1991.

Effective Dates.

Section 30 of S.L. 1995, ch. 116 declared an emergency. Approved March 14, 1995.

§ 39-7106. Local emergency response authorities — Powers and duties.

  1. Every local emergency response authority designated in or pursuant to this chapter will respond to a hazardous substance incident occurring within its jurisdiction in a fashion consistent with the Idaho hazardous materials emergency incident command and response plan except as provided in a private emergency response plan. The local emergency response authority will also respond to a hazardous substance incident which initially occurs within its jurisdiction but which spreads to another jurisdiction. If a hazardous substance incident occurs on a boundary between two (2) jurisdictions or in an area where the jurisdiction is not readily ascertainable, the first local emergency response authority to arrive at the scene of the incident will perform the initial emergency response.
  2. The incident commander shall declare the hazardous substance incident ended when the threat to public health and safety has ended and the threat to the environment has been minimized.
  3. Mutual aid agreements or contracts are encouraged among governmental entities, private parties, local emergency response authorities and the military division in order to safely respond to hazardous substance incidents. Further, mutual aid agreements are encouraged among governmental entities, local emergency response authorities and the military division with other similar entities in other states and Canada in order to ensure appropriate response to hazardous substance incidents.
  4. Any local emergency response authority designated in or pursuant to the provisions of section 39-7105, Idaho Code, may request the military division to provide assistance consistent with the Idaho hazardous materials emergency incident command and response plan.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7106, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 4, p. 357.

§ 39-7107. State disaster preparedness act controls disaster emergencies, except for the liability of responsible persons.

In the event a disaster emergency or local disaster emergency is declared by proper authority as defined and set forth in chapter 10, title 46, Idaho Code, as a result of a hazardous substance incident, the provisions of chapter 10, title 46, Idaho Code, shall govern, except that the provisions of section 39-7109, Idaho Code, shall govern reimbursement of emergency response costs and the provisions of sections 39-7111 and 39-7112, Idaho Code, shall govern the liability of and cost recovery against persons responsible for hazardous substance incidents resulting in disaster emergencies in any case.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7107, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582.

§ 39-7108. Notification of release is required.

  1. Any person who has responsibility for reporting a release under the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9603, shall, as soon as practicable after he has knowledge of any such reportable release other than a permitted release or as exempted in section 39-7108(3), Idaho Code, notify the military division of such release.
  2. Any person who has responsibility for reporting a release under the federal emergency planning and community right-to-know act, 42 U.S.C. 11001 et seq., shall as soon as practicable after he has knowledge of any such reportable release other than a permitted release notify the military division of such release.
  3. Any facility having a release reportable under section 39-7108(1), Idaho Code, shall not be required to report the release to the military division if the following circumstances are met:
    1. Such release is not reportable under subsection (2) of section 39-7108, Idaho Code.
    2. The facility has an approved private emergency response plan that details how such spills shall be responded to and reported.
  4. The military division shall immediately notify the department of environmental quality of any release reported to the military division. Such reporting to the military division shall fulfill all state reporting requirements for the department of environmental quality.
  5. Any person who does not notify the military division in accordance with the provisions of section 39-7108, Idaho Code, shall be liable for a civil penalty of a sum not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day the violation continues to a maximum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
  6. No penalty pursuant to this section shall occur if an incident occurs on private property and results in no offsite environmental damage.

This provision does not relieve the facility from any reporting required under other federal statutory, regulatory or other permit authorities.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7108, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 5, p. 357; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 64, p. 253.

§ 39-7109. Right to claim reimbursement.

  1. State emergency response teams and local emergency response authorities may submit claims to the military division for reimbursement of the following documented costs incurred as a result of their response to a hazardous substance incident:
    1. Disposable materials and supplies acquired, consumed and expended specifically for the purpose of the response;
    2. Compensation of employees for the time and efforts devoted specifically to the response that are not otherwise provided for in the applicant’s operating budget, (e.g., overtime pay for permanent full-time and other than full-time employees, recalled personnel or responding when out of jurisdiction);
    3. Rental or leasing of equipment used specifically for the response (e.g., protective equipment or clothing, scientific and technical equipment);
    4. Replacement costs for equipment owned by the applicant that is contaminated beyond reuse or repair, if the applicant can demonstrate that the equipment was a total loss and that the loss occurred as a result of the response (e.g., self-contained breathing apparatus irretrievably contaminated during the response);
    5. Decontamination of equipment contaminated during the response;
    6. Special technical services specifically required for the response (e.g., costs associated with the time and efforts of local and state personnel to recover the costs of response and of technical experts/specialists not otherwise provided for by the local government);
    7. Medical monitoring or treatment of response personnel;
    8. Laboratory costs for purposes of analyzing samples taken during the response; and
    9. Disposal costs. Such costs may be reimbursed as provided in this chapter.
  2. A private person, who is not a part of the state emergency response team or a local emergency response authority and is not liable under section 39-7111, Idaho Code, may submit a claim to the military division for costs identified in section 39-7109, Idaho Code, if their response was requested by the incident commander.
  3. Claims for reimbursement shall be submitted to the military division within sixty (60) days after termination of the hazardous substance incident for the state’s determination of payment, if any.
  4. Reimbursements shall only be paid after the military division finds that the actions by the state emergency response team or the local emergency response authority were taken in response to a hazardous substance incident as defined in this chapter.
  5. The state of Idaho shall be subrogated to the rights of any such person so reimbursed to the extent of such reimbursement.

Reimbursement for the costs identified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this subsection will not exceed the duration of the response.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7109, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 6, p. 357; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 4, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, in the introductory paragraph in subsection (1), deleted “and containment of” following “their response to”; and, in subsection (1)(f), inserted “local and state personnel to recover the costs of response and of.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-7110. Deficiency warrants for reimbursement of response costs.

  1. The military division shall review all claims for reimbursement and make recommendations as to payment or nonpayment of the claims to the board of examiners within one hundred twenty (120) days after termination of the hazardous substance incident. The board of examiners may authorize the issuance of deficiency warrants for the purpose of reimbursing reasonable and documented costs associated with emergency response actions taken pursuant to this chapter. The costs associated with routine firefighting procedures shall not be reimbursable costs under this chapter.
  2. Deficiency warrants authorized by the board of examiners shall not exceed the sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for reimbursement of all claims made as a result of a single hazardous substance incident. In the event all claims for reimbursement for a single hazardous substance incident exceed the sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), the board of examiners shall determine an appropriate and equitable basis of payment of reimbursements.
  3. Upon authorization of deficiency warrants by the board of examiners in accordance with the provisions of this section, the state controller shall draw deficiency warrants in the authorized amounts against the general fund.
  4. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to change or impair any right of recovery or subrogation arising under any other provisions of law.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7110, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1994, ch. 180, § 75, p. 420; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 7, p. 357; am. 2003, ch. 32, § 21, p. 115.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

State controller,§ 67-1001 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 241 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 provided that such act should become effective on and after the first Monday in January, 1995 [January 2, 1995] if the amendment to the Constitution of Idaho changing the name of the state auditor to state controller [1994 S.J.R. No. 109, p. 1493] was adopted at the general election held on November 8, 1994. Since such amendment was adopted, the amendment to this section by § 75 of S.L. 1994, ch. 180 became effective January 2, 1995.

§ 39-7111. Liability for release of a hazardous substance.

  1. Any person who owns, controls, transports, or causes the release or threat of release of a substance which is involved in a hazardous substance incident shall be strictly liable for the costs arising out of a hazardous substance incident, identified in section 39-7112, Idaho Code. There shall be no liability under this chapter for a person otherwise liable who can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that:
    1. The hazardous substance incident was caused solely by:
      1. An act of God;
      2. An act of war;
      3. An act or omission of a third party, other than an employee or agent of the potentially liable person if:
        1. The potentially liable person exercised reasonable care with respect to the substance involved, taking into consideration the characteristics of the substance in light of all relevant facts and circumstances; and
        2. The potentially liable person took precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of any such third party and the consequences that could foreseeably result from such acts or omissions; or
      4. Application of a pesticide product or fertilizer registered under the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act, 7 U.S.C. section 136, et seq., according to label requirements; or
    2. The substance was not a hazardous substance and the person otherwise liable acted reasonably under the circumstances.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7111, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 5, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, in the first sentence in subsection (1), inserted “or threat of release” and deleted “hazardous” preceding the first occurrence of “substance”; in subsection (1)(a)(iii)1., twice deleted “hazardous” preceding “substance”; and added subsection (1)(b).

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was enacted with a subsection (1), but no subsection (2).

§ 39-7112. Cost recovery and civil remedies.

  1. The military division shall be responsible for recovering those costs incurred by the state arising out of a hazardous substance incident identified in section 39-7109, Idaho Code, and other costs including processing the documented costs submitted by response agencies, attorney’s fees, investigation costs, prelitigation and litigation costs.
  2. In deciding whether to commence a cost recovery action, and against whom a cost recovery action will be filed, the military division in exercising its prosecutorial discretion will take into consideration the cause of the incident, the total amount of cost incurred in responding to the incident, the avoidability of the incident and such other factors as the military division deems appropriate.
  3. The remedy for the recovery of those emergency response costs identified in section 39-7109, Idaho Code, provided by this chapter shall be exclusive and shall not be used in conjunction with or in addition to any other remedy for recovery of such costs provided by applicable federal laws. Any person who receives compensation for the emergency response costs pursuant to any other federal or state law shall be precluded from recovering compensation for such costs pursuant to this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall otherwise affect or modify in any way the obligations or liability of any person under any other provision of state or federal law, including common law, for damages, injury or loss resulting from the release of any hazardous substance or potentially hazardous substance or for remedial action or the cost of remedial action for such release.
  4. It shall be the duty of the attorney general to commence any civil action brought by the military division pursuant to this chapter. At the request of a political subdivision of the state or a local governmental entity who has responded to or contained a hazardous substance incident, the attorney general may commence a civil action on their behalf pursuant to this chapter.
  5. Any person who renders assistance at the request of the incident commander or his authorized designee in response to a hazardous substance incident may file a civil action under the provisions of this chapter for recoverable costs which have not been reimbursed by the state.
  6. There is hereby created in the state treasury the hazardous substance emergency response fund. Recoveries by the state for reimbursed costs shall be deposited in said fund to offset amounts paid as reimbursement.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7112, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 8, p. 357; am. 2004, ch. 181, § 1, p. 568; am. 2009, ch. 281, § 6, p. 844.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 39-7112.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 281, in subsection (1), substituted “other costs” for “legal costs” and inserted “processing the documented costs submitted by response agencies” and “prelitigation”; in the last sentence in subsection (3), inserted “or potentially hazardous substance”; and, in subsection (5), inserted “at the request of the incident commander or his authorized designee.”

§ 39-7113. Persons rendering assistance relating to hazardous substance incidents — Good samaritan limited immunity.

  1. Consistent with the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this section:
    1. The state shall be liable for the acts or omissions of the state emergency response teams responding to a hazardous substance incident.
    2. The designating or requesting city or county shall be liable for the acts or omissions of a local emergency response authority responding to a hazardous substance incident within its jurisdiction.
  2. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any state emergency response team, local emergency response authority or other person who responds to a hazardous substance incident at the request of an incident commander shall not be subject to civil liability for assistance or advice, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section.
  3. The exemption from civil liability provided in this section shall not apply to:
    1. An act or omission that caused in whole or in part such hazardous substance incident or a person who may otherwise be liable therefor; or
    2. Any person who has acted in a grossly negligent, reckless, or intentional manner.
  4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate or limit the immunity granted to governmental entities pursuant to chapter 9, title 6, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7113, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582.

§ 39-7114. Private emergency response plan approval.

Private emergency response plans may be prepared for any facility or specific set of conditions. A private emergency response plan must be approved by the local emergency response authority or the military division unless the plan:

  1. Is a contingency plan that has been approved in the issuance of a final part B operating permit, in accordance with section 39-4401, Idaho Code, by the Idaho department of environmental quality;
  2. Is a contingency plan prepared in accordance with the requirements of rules promulgated pursuant to section 39-4401, Idaho Code, by the Idaho department of environmental quality;
  3. Has otherwise been approved by the military division or department of environmental quality. Private emergency response plans must be submitted, for file purposes, to the local emergency response authorities and the military division to qualify as a private emergency response plan under this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7114, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582; am. 1997, ch. 121, § 9, p. 357; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 65, p. 253.

§ 39-7114A. Civil air patrol.

  1. There is hereby established within the military division and the Idaho office of emergency management the Idaho directorate of civil air patrol. The mission of the directorate shall be to provide support for and facilitate the operation of the civil air patrol, Idaho wing, which shall be under the command and control of the duly appointed commanding officer of such wing.
  2. In consideration for services rendered to the state of Idaho by the directorate of civil air patrol, Idaho wing, the military division shall provide in-kind services to the directorate in the form of land use, hangar facilities, mess and billeting facilities, office space and other entities when deemed necessary and when such facilities are available.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7114A, as added by 2012, ch. 313, § 1, p. 862; am. 2016, ch. 118, § 5, p. 331.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho office of emergency management,§ 46-1004.

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 118, substituted “Idaho office of emergency management” for “bureau of homeland security” in subsection (1).

§ 39-7115. Severability.

The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of remaining portions of this act.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7115, as added by 1991, ch. 242, § 1, p. 582.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 1991, ch. 242, which is compiled as§§ 39-7101 to 39-7115.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1991, ch. 242 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 1991.

Chapter 72 IDAHO LAND REMEDIATION ACT

Sec.

§ 39-7201. Short title.

This chapter may be known and cited as the “Idaho Land Remediation Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7201, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7202. Legislative findings.

The legislature hereby finds and declares:

  1. That it is the policy of the state of Idaho to provide for the protection of the public health, welfare, safety, and environment; and to foster the remediation, transfer, reuse, or redevelopment of sites or groups of sites based on the risk to human health and the environment where releases or threatened release of hazardous substances or petroleum exists. The minimization of risk to public health and the environment on a commercial and industrial site offers significant potential economic benefit to local communities and is vital to their use and reuse as sources of employment, housing, recreation and open-space areas.
  2. That establishing a voluntary program for the remediation of hazardous substance or petroleum contaminated sites will encourage innovation and cooperation between the state, local communities, and interested persons and will promote the economic revitalization of property. It is intended that this program will provide for an expedited remediation process by eliminating the need for many adversarial enforcement actions and delays in remediation plan approvals.
  3. That providing financial assistance to eligible property owners who conduct voluntary cleanups will promote the economic revitalization of property, particularly in rural communities, and will reduce or eliminate the need for many adversarial enforcement actions and delays in remediation plan approvals.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7202, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795; am. 2006, ch. 308, § 1, p. 947.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 308, added subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7203. General definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Board” means the board of environmental quality.
  2. “Department” means the department of environmental quality.
  3. “Eligible property owner” means any individual, association, partnership, firm, joint stock company, trust, estate, private corporation, or any other nonpublic entity that is the current owner of a contaminated property, but that did not cause, contribute, or consent to the release that led to the contamination or own the property at the time of the release that led to the contamination. An eligible property owner shall not include any individual, association, partnership, firm, joint stock company, trust, estate, private corporation, or any other nonpublic entity that is:
    1. Affiliated with any individual or entity that caused, contributed, or consented to the release that led to the contamination, or owned the property at the time of the release that led to the contamination, whether directly or through a direct or indirect familial relationship, or any contractual, corporate, or financial relationship, excluding such relationships created by a contract for the sale of the property at issue; or
    2. The owner as a result of a reorganization of an entity that caused, contributed, or consented to the release that led to the contamination, or that owned the property at the time of the release that led to the contamination.
  4. “Hazardous substance” has the meaning set forth in section 101(14) of the comprehensive environmental, response, compensation and liability act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 (14) as amended.
  5. “Person” means any individual, association, partnership, firm, joint stock company, trust, estate, political subdivision, public or private corporation, state or federal governmental department, agency or instrumentality, or any other legal entity which is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties.
  6. “Petroleum” includes petroleum asphalt and crude oil or any part of petroleum asphalt or crude oil that is liquid at standard conditions of temperature and pressure (sixty (60) degrees Fahrenheit and fourteen and seven-tenths (14.7) pounds per square inch absolute).
  7. “Qualifying remediation costs” means reasonable costs incurred performing remediation activities integral to achieving the cleanup goals identified in a remediation work plan approved by the department.
  8. “Release” means any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment, including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers, or other closed receptacles containing any hazardous substance or petroleum.
  9. “Remediation” means any of the following:
    1. Actions necessary to prevent, minimize, or mitigate damages to the public health or welfare or to the environment, which may otherwise result from a release or threat of a release; or
    2. Actions consistent with a permanent remedy taken instead of, or in addition to, removal actions in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or petroleum into the environment to eliminate the release of hazardous substances or petroleum so that the hazardous substances or petroleum do not migrate to cause substantial danger to present or future public health or welfare or the environment; or (c) The cleanup or removal of released hazardous substances or petroleum from the environment.
  10. “Site” means a parcel of real estate for which an application has been submitted under section 39-7204, Idaho Code.
  11. “Technical professional” means a professional geologist or professional engineer registered in the state of Idaho.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7203, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 66, p. 253; am. 2006, ch. 308, § 2, p. 947.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of environmental quality,§ 39-107.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 308, added subsections (3), (7), and (11), and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7204. Participation.

  1. To participate in the remediation program a person must submit an application to the department as described under subsection (2) of this section.
  2. An application submitted under this section must meet the following conditions:
    1. Contain the following general information concerning:
      1. the person,
      2. the site, and
      3. other background information as requested by the department;
    2. An environmental assessment that conforms to ASTM Standard Practice E 1527, as amended, or equivalent.
  3. Not more than thirty (30) days after receiving an application under subsection (2) of this section, the department shall determine if the person is eligible to participate in the remediation program under this chapter.
  4. The department may reject an application submitted under subsection (2) of this section for any of the following reasons:
    1. Remediation is required pursuant to sections 39-101 through 39-129, sections 39-4401 through 39-4432, or sections 39-7401 through 39-7420, Idaho Code, or rules promulgated thereunder, or other applicable statutory or common law; or
    2. The condition of the hazardous substance or petroleum described in the application constitutes an imminent and substantial threat to human health or the environment; or
    3. The application is not complete.
  5. If the application is rejected under subsection (4)(c) of this section, the department shall provide the person with a list of all information needed to make the application complete. If the department fails to comply with this subsection, the application shall be considered completed for the purposes of this chapter.
  6. If the department rejects an application, the department shall do the following:
    1. Notify the person that the department rejected the application;
    2. Explain the reason the department rejected the application.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7204, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

For ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, see http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1527.htm .

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7205. Work plans.

  1. If the department determines an application is eligible under this chapter, the person may submit a proposed voluntary remediation work plan to the department. Before the department evaluates a proposed voluntary remediation work plan, the person who submitted the work plan and the department must enter into a voluntary remediation agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions of the evaluation and the implementation of the work plan.
    1. A voluntary remediation agreement must include the following:
      1. An estimation of costs the department may incur under this chapter;
      2. A payment schedule of all reasonable costs estimated to be incurred by the department in the review and oversight of the work plan;
      3. A provision for the department’s oversight including access to site and pertinent site records;
      4. A timetable for the department to do the following:
        1. Reasonably review and evaluate the adequacy of the work plan; or
        2. Make a determination concerning the approval or rejection of the work plan;
      5. A provision to modify the voluntary remediation agreement and voluntary remediation work plan based upon unanticipated site conditions;
      6. Any other conditions considered necessary by the department or the person concerning the effective and efficient implementation of this chapter.
      7. request a public hearing concerning the proposed voluntary remediation work plan.
    2. A proposed voluntary remediation work plan must include a proposed statement of work and schedule to accomplish the remediation in accordance with rules established by the board. Any institutional control proposed as part of a work plan that requires activity and/or use limitations shall comply with the uniform environmental covenants act, chapter 30, title 55, Idaho Code.
  2. If a voluntary remediation agreement is not reached between a person and the department within a reasonable time after good faith negotiations have begun, the person or the department may withdraw from the negotiations.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7205, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795; am. 2010, ch. 99, § 1, p. 191.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 99, added the last sentence in paragraph (1)(b).

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7206. Evaluation and review responsibilities.

  1. Pursuant to the signed voluntary remediation agreement, the department or a person under contract with the department shall do the following:
    1. Review and evaluate the site and the affected area surrounding the site;
    2. Review and evaluate the proposed voluntary remediation work plan for protection of public health and the environment based on rules promulgated by the board.
  2. At any time during the evaluation of a proposed voluntary remediation work plan, the department may request that a person submit additional or corrected information to the department. A person may:
    1. Comply with the request; or
    2. Withdraw the person’s proposed voluntary remediation work plan from consideration and terminate the voluntary remediation agreement.
  3. Before the department approves a proposed voluntary remediation work plan under this section, the department must:
    1. Notify local government units located in a county affected by the proposed voluntary remediation work plan of the work plan; and,
    2. Provide that a copy of the proposed voluntary remediation work plan and a copy of the voluntary remediation agreement be placed in at least one (1) public library in a county affected by the work plan; and,
    3. Notify by reasonable public notice potentially affected persons to request comments concerning the proposed voluntary remediation work plan; and,
    4. Provide a comment period of at least thirty (30) days following publication of a notice under this section. During the comment period, interested potentially affected persons may do the following:
    5. submit written comments to the department concerning the proposed voluntary remediation work plan,
  4. If the department receives a significant number of written requests from potentially affected persons, the department may hold a public hearing in the geographical area affected by the proposed voluntary remediation work plan on the question of whether to modify, approve or reject the work plan. All written comments and public testimony shall be considered by the department.
  5. The department shall:
    1. Approve;
    2. Modify and approve; or
    3. Reject the proposed voluntary remediation work plan.
  6. If the department rejects a proposed voluntary remediation work plan under this section:
    1. The department shall notify the person and specify the reasons for rejecting the work plan; and
    2. The person may appeal the department’s decision under chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  7. If the department approves, or modifies and approves, a proposed voluntary remediation work plan under this section, the department shall: (a) Notify the person in writing, under the applicable provisions set forth in this chapter, that the voluntary remediation work plan has been approved, or modified and approved;

(b) Incorporate the approved voluntary remediation work plan into the voluntary remediation agreement.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7206, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7207. Covenant not to sue.

  1. If the department determines that a person has successfully completed a voluntary remediation work plan approved under this chapter, the department shall certify that the work plan has been successfully implemented or satisfied by issuing the person a certificate of completion. The issuance of a certificate of completion under this section is a final agency action for purposes of this chapter.
  2. A person who receives a certificate of completion under this section shall record a copy of the certificate of completion with the deed for the site on which the remediation took place.
  3. If the department determines that the person has not successfully implemented a voluntary remediation work plan approved under this chapter, the department shall notify the person of this determination under this chapter.
  4. If the department issues a certificate of completion to a person under this chapter, the department, upon request, shall also negotiate and provide the person a covenant not to sue for any claim for environmental remediation under state law resulting from or based upon the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or petroleum that is the subject of the approved voluntary remediation work plan successfully implemented under this chapter. The covenant not to sue shall extend to any current or future owner or operator of the site or portion thereof who did not cause, aggravate, or contribute to the release or threatened release.
  5. A covenant not to sue issued under this section shall not apply to claims for a condition or the extent of a condition that:
    1. Was present on the site involved in an approved and implemented voluntary remediation work plan; and
    2. Was not known to the department at the time the department issued the certificate of completion under this chapter.
  6. Except as provided under federal law or agreed to by a federal governmental entity, a covenant not to sue issued under this section shall not release a person from liability to the federal government for claims based on federal law.
  7. During the implementation of an approved voluntary remediation work plan, the department shall not bring an action, including an administrative or judicial action for any liability for remediation relating to the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or petroleum that is the subject of the voluntary remediation work plan, against a person who entered into a voluntary remediation agreement and who is implementing the voluntary remediation work plan in accordance with such agreement implementing the voluntary remediation work plan.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7207, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7208. Recision.

  1. This chapter does not prohibit or limit the department’s recision of the voluntary remediation agreement or the covenant not to sue at any time if:
    1. The person implementing the work plan fails substantially to comply with the terms and conditions of:
      1. a voluntary remediation agreement, or
      2. covenant not to sue;
    2. A hazardous substance or petroleum release becomes an imminent and substantial threat to human health or the environment.
  2. The department shall also notify the county in which the said site exists of recision of the covenant not to sue for the purposes of determining property exemptions provided under section 63-602BB, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7208, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795; am. 1997, ch. 117, § 41, p. 298.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

Section 42 of S.L. 1997, ch. 117 declared an emergency and provided that §§ 1 through 40 would be in full force and effect on and after passage and approval and that § 41 should be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997. Approved March 15, 1997.

§ 39-7209. Lender liability.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the board, a person who maintains indicia of ownership primarily to protect a security interest in a site, and who does not participate in the management of the site, shall not be considered an owner or operator of that site, nor liable under any pollution control or other environmental protection law, rule or regulation, or otherwise responsible for any environmental contamination or response activity costs consistent with United States environmental protection agency policy, 60 Federal Register 63517, dated December 11, 1995, as amended. This section shall apply to all indicia of ownership existing at the time of passage of this chapter and those arising thereafter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7209, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7210. Rules.

Within one (1) year after the effective date of this section, the board shall, through negotiated rulemaking, adopt rules to carry out the purposes of this provision consistent with federal and state law which shall provide for the following:

  1. The establishment of methodologies to determine site-specific risk-based remediation standards, which shall be no more stringent than applicable or appropriate relevant federal and state standards and are consistent with 42 U.S.C. 9621, taking into consideration scientific information regarding the following:
    1. protection of public health and the environment,
    2. the future industrial, commercial, residential, or other use of the site to be remediated and of surrounding properties,
    3. the availability of institutional or engineering controls that are protective of public health and the environment, including deed restrictions, and
    4. natural background levels for hazardous constituents;
  2. The establishment of administrative procedures that minimize delay and expense of the remediation, processing submissions and overseeing remediation;
  3. The issuance of certificates of completion once the voluntary remediation work plans is [are] implemented;
  4. Consistent with applicable local, state and federal law, guidelines to assist in the issuance of any permits required to initiate and complete a voluntary remediation work plan;
  5. Collection and payment of fees to defray the actual reasonable costs of the voluntary remediation program.[;]
  6. Lender liability consistent with United States environmental protection agency policy, 60 Federal Register 63517, dated December 11, 1995, as amended.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7210, as added by 1996, ch. 252, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this section” in the introductory paragraph refers to the effective date of the enactment of this section by S.L. 1996, ch. 252, which was February 15, 1997.

The bracketed insertions in paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(5) were added by the compiler to correct the enacting legislation.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 252 read: “This act shall be in full force and effect on and after February 15, 1997, provided that the Board of Health and Welfare is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this act on and after July 1, 1996, as provided in Section 39-7210, Idaho Code, contained in Section 1 of this act. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 1997.” Such rules were proposed on November 16, 1996 and, thus, the act became effective February 15, 1997.

§ 39-7211. Idaho community reinvestment pilot initiative. [For contingent repeal, see Compiler’s note.]

  1. There is hereby established in the state treasury a fund to be known as the Idaho community reinvestment pilot initiative fund which shall consist of moneys appropriated to the fund, donations, gifts and grants from any source and any other moneys which may hereafter be provided by law. The state treasurer shall be the custodian of the fund and shall invest said moneys in accordance with law. Any interest earned on the moneys in the fund shall be deposited in the fund. Moneys in the fund shall be disbursed in accordance with the directions of the director of the department of environmental quality. All moneys in the fund are perpetually appropriated to the director for expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this section.
  2. The state of Idaho hereby authorizes financial assistance to eligible property owners conducting voluntary cleanup actions pursuant to this chapter. The financial assistance authorized by this section shall not exceed one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per project and shall be limited to, subject to the one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) maximum, seventy-percent (70%) of a project’s qualifying remediation costs certified by the department pursuant to this section.
  3. Pursuant to general fund appropriation, the maximum overall financial assistance authorized by this section is one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) in qualified remediation cost expenditures. A maximum of ten (10) projects may participate in the initiative.
  4. The department shall establish an annual priority list for community revitalization projects. The priority list shall be used as the method for allocating funds under this initiative.
    1. On an annual basis, the department shall establish, at a minimum, a continuous three (3) month calendar period in which eligible property owners may submit a written request, on a standard form developed by the department, to participate.
    2. On an annual basis, the department shall develop a priority list based on a weighted numerical points system established by the department. The rating system shall consider the following criteria wherein the department shall weigh each succeeding criteria less heavily than the preceding criteria:
      1. Whether the project is located in a city with a population of under twenty thousand (20,000) residents;
      2. The level of social and economic benefit expected from the proposed reuse plan;
      3. Whether contamination is preventing or complicating redevelopment;
      4. Whether a reuse plan meets local planning and reuse goals, is compatible with long-term plans, and is ready to proceed;
      5. The level of human health risks the cleanup will remedy;
      6. Current property conditions, including building safety concerns, vacancy rates and the level of negative visual impact the property has on the community.
    3. The department shall maintain annual priority lists of the twenty-five (25) highest priority projects.
    4. After finalizing the priority list, the department shall contact, in writing, the eligible property owners that submitted the ten (10) highest ranked priority projects and will set a target date for the eligible property owners to enter into a voluntary remediation agreement as described in subsection (1) of section 39-7205, Idaho Code.
    5. The department may bypass a project, and submit in its place the next highest priority project on the project list, for any of the following reasons:
      1. The eligible property owner fails to enter into a voluntary remediation agreement by the target date established by the department;
      2. The eligible property owner, in writing, withdraws its request to participate; or
      3. The voluntary remediation agreement is terminated or rescinded by the department prior to commencement of remediation as described in the voluntary remediation agreement approved by the department.
  5. Eligible property owners may request a community investment rebate by submitting documentation and certifications enumerated in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this subsection to the department. Eligible property owners shall submit this information no more than sixty (60) days after the department issues a certificate of completion for the project. Eligible property owners must receive a written certificate of completion from the department before the department may certify qualifying remediation costs or provide a community reinvestment rebate. Information to be submitted includes:
    1. Copies of contracts and documentation of contract negotiations, accounts, invoices, sales tickets, or other payment records from purchases, sales, leases, or other transactions involving actual costs incurred completing remediation activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the department;
    2. Notarized documentation completed and signed by the participant certifying that all information contained in the application, including all records of claims, costs incurred, and costs paid, are true and correct and constitute qualifying remediation costs;
    3. Notarized documentation completed and signed by a technical professional certifying that a technical professional oversaw all remediation work plan activities and that all costs associated with documents submitted pursuant to this subsection constitute qualifying remediation costs.
  6. Community reinvestment rebate requests shall be reviewed and certified as follows:
    1. The department shall review each community reinvestment rebate request and determine whether the request is complete. If the department determines the request is incomplete, the department shall return the request, with the deficiencies indicated, to the eligible property owner by certified mail;
    2. Once a community reinvestment rebate request is deemed complete, the department shall review the request and determine the project’s qualifying remediation costs. The department shall then issue a certification of the qualifying remediation costs for all those costs found to be reasonable by the department;
    3. The department shall issue the eligible property owner a community reinvestment rebate in the amount it certified as qualified remediation costs no more than thirty (30) days after department certification;
    4. Any eligible property owner or technical professional determined in a civil enforcement action to have submitted a false statement, representation or certification in any application, record, report, plan or other document submitted to the department, shall reimburse the state of Idaho for moneys wrongfully rebated and shall be liable for civil penalties and expenses incurred by the department in accordance with chapter 1, title 39, Idaho Code. (7) Eligible property owners that receive a community investment rebate are not eligible to receive the property tax exemption established under section 63-602BB, Idaho Code.

The department shall notify the bypassed eligible property owner of the reason or reasons for the bypass.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7211, as added by 2006, ch. 308, § 3, p. 947.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 4 of S.L. 2006, ch. 308 provided: “Section 3 of this act shall be null, void and of no force and effect on and after the date the director of the Department of Environmental Quality certifies to the Secretary of State that the department has expended funds at ten community revitalization projects pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 of this act.”

Chapter 73 [RESERVED]

Chapter 74 IDAHO SOLID WASTE FACILITIES ACT

Sec.

§ 39-7401. Legislative findings and purposes.

  1. The legislature finds:
    1. That adverse public health and environmental impacts can result from the improper land disposal of solid waste and that the need for establishing safe sites with adequate capacity for the disposal of solid waste is a matter of statewide concern and necessity; and
    2. That the resource conservation and recovery act (42 U.S.C. sec. 6901, et seq.) as amended, and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, establish complex, detailed and costly provisions for the location, design, operation and monitoring of solid waste disposal sites, including such sites as may be operated pursuant to the responsibility established in chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code; and
    3. That a state program to implement flexible standards provided in 40 CFR 258, if approved by the U.S. environmental protection agency, enables a state to take advantage of site specific factors in the design and operation of solid waste facilities and flexibility in meeting federal criteria set forth in that regulation; and
    4. That 40 CFR 258 provides that such a program of flexible standards requires approvals by a designated state agency; and
    5. That chapter 1, title 39, Idaho Code, vests the department of environmental quality with the responsibility to issue a certificate of suitability concerning prospective solid waste landfill sites, to approve solid waste facility and ground water monitoring programs and to provide approvals pursuant to 40 CFR 258; and
    6. That chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code, imposes on the counties the primary responsibility for the development and operation of a solid waste management system; and
    7. That chapter 4, title 39, Idaho Code, vests the health districts with the primary responsibility for the review of solid waste facility operations plans and the enforcement of solid waste management operations; and
    8. That the coordination and timeliness of response to federal law on the part of all public officials within the state is critical to compliance with federal regulations, the ability of each affected agency to carry out their statutory responsibilities and the avoidance of excessive construction and public expenditures.
  2. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to establish a program of solid waste management which complies with 40 CFR 258 and facilitates the incorporation of flexible standards in facility design and operation. The legislature hereby establishes the solid waste disposal standards and procedures outlined herein and a facility approval process for the state of Idaho, the political subdivisions thereof, and any private solid waste disposal site owner in order to facilitate the development and operation of solid waste disposal sites, to effect timely and responsible completion of statutory duties and to ensure protection of human health and the environment, to protect the air, land and waters of the state of Idaho.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7401, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 1, p. 342; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 67, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-7402. Applicability.

  1. The standards and procedures set forth in this chapter apply to owners and operators of new municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) units, existing MSWLF units, and lateral expansions of existing MSWLF units, except as otherwise specifically provided.
  2. The requirements of this chapter do not apply to MSWLF units that ceased to accept waste on or prior to October 9, 1991.
  3. MSWLF units that receive waste after October 9, 1991, but stop receiving waste in conformance with the provisions of 40 CFR 258.1(d), are exempt from the requirements of this chapter, except as expressly provided herein.
  4. All MSWLF units that receive waste on or after October 9, 1993, must comply with all of the requirements of this chapter, unless otherwise allowed in 40 CFR 258.1(d), (e) or (f).
  5. MSWLF units failing to satisfy these standards shall cease operation and shall not accept municipal solid waste for disposal by order of the department of environmental quality and/or the district health department until provisions of this chapter are complied with unless a compliance schedule has been approved by the director of the department of environmental quality and/or the district health department.
  6. MSWLF units failing to satisfy the requirements set forth in this chapter are considered open dumps for purposes of state solid waste management planning and are prohibited under section 4005 of RCRA.
  7. MSWLF units containing sewage sludge and which fail to satisfy the criteria set forth in 40 CFR 258 violate sections 309 and 405(e) of the clean water act.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7402, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 2, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 2, p. 156; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 68, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

Section 4005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), referred to in subsection (6), is compiled as 42 USCS § 6945.

Sections 309 and 405(e) of the clean water act, referred to in subsection (7), are codified as 42 USCS §§ 1319 and 1345(e), respectively.

Compiler’s Notes.

The letters “MSWLF” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

County Board of Commissioners.

A county board of commissioners does not fall within the definition of an “agency” for the purposes of applying the administrative procedures act in its totality; however, the commissioners’ decisions are subject to judicial review under this chapter. Petersen v. Franklin County, 130 Idaho 176, 938 P.2d 1214 (1997).

§ 39-7402A. Excluded facilities.

This chapter shall not apply to any facility subject to the provisions of subtitle C of RCRA, the hazardous waste management act of 1983, as amended (section 39-4401, et seq., Idaho Code) or the state hazardous waste facility siting act, as amended (section 39-5801, et seq., Idaho Code).

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7421, as added by 1992, ch. 292, § 2, p. 972; am. and redesig. 1993, ch. 139, § 3, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Legislative Intent.

Section 1 of S.L. 1992, ch. 292 read: “(1) The legislature of the State of Idaho hereby finds that: (a) certain classes of facilities that dispose of, store or treat hazardous materials and wastes are comprehensively regulated pursuant to federal and state laws.

“(2) Therefore, it is hereby declared that the purpose of this act is to preclude additional regulations through the enactment of Section 39-7421, Idaho Code.”

Federal References.

Subtitle C of the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA), referred to in this section, is compiled as 42 USCS § 6921 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-7421.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1992, ch. 292 declared an emergency. Approved April 8, 1992.

§ 39-7403. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Active portion” means that part of a facility or unit that has received or is receiving wastes and that has not been closed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.60.
  2. “Agricultural wastes” means wastes generated on farms resulting from the production of agricultural products including, but not limited to, manures and carcasses of dead animals weighing each or collectively in excess of fifteen (15) pounds but do not include wastes that are classified as hazardous.
  3. “Applicant” means the owner or the operator with the owner’s written consent.
  4. “Aquifer” means a geological formation, group of formations, or a portion of a formation capable of yielding significant quantities of ground water to wells or springs.
  5. “Board” means the Idaho board of environmental quality.
  6. “Buffer zone” means that part of a facility that lies between the active portion and the property boundary.
  7. “Clean soils and clean dredge spoils” means soils and dredge spoils which are not hazardous wastes or problem wastes as defined in this section.
  8. “Commercial solid waste” means all types of solid waste generated by stores, offices, restaurants, warehouses and other nonmanufacturing activities, excluding residential and industrial wastes.
  9. “Commercial solid waste facility” means a facility owned and operated as an enterprise conducted with the intent of making a profit by any individual, association, firm, or partnership for the disposal of solid waste, but excludes a facility owned or operated by a political subdivision, state or federal agency, municipality or a facility owned or operated by any individual, association, firm or partnership exclusively for the disposal of solid waste generated by such individual, association, firm or partnership.
  10. “Construction/demolition waste” means the waste building materials, packaging and rubble resulting from construction, remodeling, repair and demolition operations on pavements, houses, commercial buildings and other structures. Such waste includes, but is not limited to, bricks, concrete, other masonry materials, soil, rock, lumber, road spoils, rebar, paving materials and tree stumps. Noninert wastes and asbestos wastes are not considered to be demolition waste for the purposes of this chapter.
  11. “Contaminate” means to allow discharge of a substance from a landfill that would cause:
    1. The concentration of that substance in the ground water to exceed the maximum contamination level (MCL) specified in 40 CFR 258.40, Idaho drinking water standards; or
    2. A statistically significant increase in the concentration of that substance in the ground water where the existing concentration of that substance exceeds the maximum contamination level specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection; or
    3. A statistically significant increase above background in the concentration of a substance which:
      1. is not specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection; and
      2. is a result of the disposal of solid waste; and
      3. has been determined by the department to present a substantial risk to human health or the environment in the concentrations found at the point of compliance. (12) “County” means any county in the state of Idaho.
      4. within one thousand (1,000) feet of any perennial lake or pond.
  12. “County” means any county in the state of Idaho.
  13. “Cover material” means soil or other suitable material that is used to protect the active portion of the MSWLF unit.
  14. “Director” means the director of the Idaho department of environmental quality.
  15. “Existing MSWLF unit” means any municipal solid waste landfill unit that is receiving solid waste as of the applicable date specified in 40 CFR 258.1(e).
  16. “Facility” means all contiguous land and structures, buffer zones, and other appurtenances and improvements on the land used for the disposal of solid waste.
  17. “Floodplain” means the area encompassed by the one hundred (100) year flood as defined by applicable federal emergency management agency (FEMA) flood insurance maps or, if no map exists, then as defined in 40 CFR 258.11.
  18. “Ground water” means water below the land surface in a zone of saturation.
  19. “Health district” means one (1) of the seven (7) district health departments of the state of Idaho.
  20. “Holocene fault” means a fault characterized as a fracture or a zone of fractures in any material along which strata on one (1) side have been displaced with respect to that on the other side and holocene being the most recent epoch of the quaternary period, extending from the end of the pleistocene epoch to the present.
  21. “Household waste” means any solid waste, including garbage, trash and sanitary waste in septic tanks, derived from households, including single and multiple residences, hotels and motels, bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew quarters, campgrounds, picnic grounds and day use recreation areas.
  22. “Industrial solid waste” means solid waste generated by manufacturing or industrial processes that is not a hazardous waste regulated under subtitle C of RCRA. Such waste may include, but is not limited to, waste resulting from the following manufacturing processes: electric power generation; fertilizer and agricultural chemicals; food and related products and byproducts; inorganic chemicals; iron and steel manufacturing; leather and leather products; nonferrous metals manufacturing/foundries; organic chemicals; plastics and resins manufacturing; pulp and paper industry; rubber and miscellaneous plastic products; stone, glass, clay and concrete products; textile manufacturing; transportation equipment; and water treatment. This term does not include mining waste or oil and gas waste.
  23. “Inert wastes” means noncombustible, nonhazardous, nonputrescible, nonleaching solid wastes that are likely to retain their physical and chemical structure under expected conditions of disposal, including resistance to biological attack.
  24. “Landfill” means an area of land or an excavation in which wastes are placed for permanent disposal, and that is not a land application unit, surface impoundment, injection well or waste pile.
  25. “Landspreading disposal facility” or “land application unit” means a facility that applies sludges or other solid wastes onto or incorporates solid waste into the soil surface, excluding manure spreading operations, at greater than agronomic rates and soil conditioners and immobilization rates.
  26. “Lateral expansion” means a horizontal expansion of the waste boundaries of an existing MSWLF unit.
  27. “Leachate” means a liquid that has passed through or emerged from solid waste and contains soluble, suspended or miscible materials removed from such waste.
  28. “Limited purpose landfill” means a landfill that receives solid waste of limited type with known and consistent composition other than wood wastes, municipal solid waste, inert waste and construction/demolition waste. (29) “Liquid waste” as defined in 40 CFR 258.28(c)(1).
    1. Overburden, waste dumps and low-grade stockpiles from mining operations;
    2. Liquid wastes whose discharge or potential discharge is regulated under federal, state or local water pollution permits;
    3. Hazardous wastes as designated in the hazardous waste management act, chapter 44, title 39, Idaho Code;
    4. Wood waste used for ornamental, animal bedding, mulch and plant bedding and road building purposes;
    5. Agricultural wastes, limited to manures and crop residues, returned to the soils at agronomic rates;
    6. Clean soils and clean dredge spoils as otherwise regulated under section 404 of the federal clean water act (PL 95-217);
    7. Septage taken to a sewage treatment plant permitted by either the U.S. environmental protection agency or the department; and
    8. Wood debris resulting from the harvesting of timber and the disposal of which is permitted under chapter 1, title 38, Idaho Code.

(30) “Monofill” means a landfill which contains a specific waste whose waste stream characteristics remain unchanged over time and may include special wastes, problem wastes or other consistent characteristic wastes but do not include wastes regulated under any other applicable regulations.

(31) “Municipal solid waste landfill unit (MSWLF)” means a discrete area of land or an excavation that receives household waste, and that is not a land application unit, surface impoundment, injection well, or waste pile, as those terms are defined under 40 CFR 257.2. A MSWLF unit also may receive other types of RCRA subtitle D wastes, such as commercial solid waste, nonhazardous sludge, conditionally exempt small quantity generator waste and industrial solid waste. Such a landfill may be publicly or privately owned. A MSWLF unit may be a new MSWLF unit, an existing MSWLF unit or a lateral expansion.

(32) “New MSWLF unit” means any municipal solid waste landfill unit that has not received waste prior to October 9, 1993, or prior to October 9, 1995, if the MSWLF unit meets the conditions specified in 40 CFR 258.1(f)(1).

(33) “Open burning” means the combustion of solid waste without: (a) control of combustion air to maintain adequate temperature for efficient combustion; (b) containment of the combustion reaction in an enclosed device to provide sufficient resident time and mixing for complete combustion; and (c) control of the emission of the combustion products.

(34) “Operator” means the person(s) responsible for the overall operation of a facility or part of a facility.

(35) “Owner” means the person(s) who owns a facility or part of a facility.

(36) “Permeability” means the capacity of a material to transmit a liquid. For the purposes of this chapter permeability is expressed in terms of hydraulic conductivity of water in centimeters-per-second units of measurement.

(37) “Person” means an individual, association, firm, partnership, political subdivision, public or private corporation, state or federal agency, municipality, industry, or any other legal entity whatsoever.

(38) “Pile” or “waste pile” means any noncontainerized solid, nonflowing waste that is accumulated for treatment or storage.

(39) “Plan of operation” means the written plan developed by an owner or operator of a MSWLF unit detailing how the facility is to be operated during its active life, during closure, and throughout the post closure period.

(40) “Point of compliance” means a vertical surface located at the hydraulically downgradient intercept with the uppermost aquifer at which a release from a waste management unit measured as change in constituent values will trigger assessment monitoring. Point of compliance shall be used to define the facility design, location and frequency of ground water monitoring wells and corrective action.

(41) “Post closure” means the requirements placed upon the MSWLF unit after closure to ensure their environmental safety for a thirty (30) year period or until the site becomes stabilized in accordance with section 39-7416, Idaho Code.

(42) “Processing” means an operation conducted on solid waste to prepare it for disposal.

(43) “Qualified professional” means a licensed professional geologist or licensed professional engineer, as appropriate, holding current professional registration in compliance with applicable provisions of the Idaho Code. (44) “RCRA” means the resource conservation and recovery act (42 U.S.C. sec. 6901 et seq.), as amended.

(45) “Run-off” means any rainwater, leachate, or other liquid that drains over land from any part of a facility.

(46) “Run-on” means any rainwater, leachate, or other liquid that drains over land onto any part of a facility.

(47) “Saturated zone” means that part of the earth’s crust in which all voids are filled with water.

(48) “Septage” means a semisolid consisting of settled sewage solids combined with varying amounts of water and dissolved materials generated from a septic tank system.

(49) “Sludge” means any solid, semisolid, or liquid waste generated from a municipal, commercial, or industrial waste water treatment plant, water supply treatment plant or air pollution control facility exclusive of the treated effluent from a waste water treatment plant.

(50) “Solid waste” means any garbage or refuse, sludge from a waste water treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility and other discarded material including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations and from community activities, but does not include solid or dissolved materials in domestic sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or industrial discharges that are point sources subject to permit under 33 U.S.C. 1342, or source, special nuclear, or byproduct material as defined in the atomic energy act of 1954, as amended (68 Stat. 923). These regulations shall not apply to the following solid wastes:

(51) “Special waste” means those wastes which require special treatment or handling after it arrives at the disposal site. The term includes, but is not limited to, asbestos containing material, petroleum contaminated soils, low-level PCB containing material, low-level dioxin containing material and uncut tires.

(52) “Statistically significant” means significant as determined by ANOVA analysis of variance as applied within 40 CFR 258.53(h)(2) or as provided by 40 CFR 258.53(g)(5).

(53) “Uppermost aquifer” means the geological formation nearest the natural ground surface that is an aquifer as well as lower aquifers that are hydraulically interconnected with this aquifer within the facility’s property boundary. (54) “Waste management unit boundary” means a vertical surface located at the hydraulically downgradient limit of the unit. This vertical surface extends down into the uppermost aquifer.

(55) “Water quality standard” means a standard set for maximum allowable contamination in surface waters and ground water as set forth in the water quality standards for waters for the state of Idaho.

(56) “Wetlands” as defined in 40 CFR 232.2(r).

(57) “Wood waste” means solid waste consisting of wood pieces or particles generated as a byproduct or waste from the manufacturing of wood products, handling and storage of raw materials and trees and stumps. This includes, but is not limited to, sawdust, chips, shavings, bark, pulp, hog fuel and log yard waste, but does not include wood pieces or particles containing chemical preservatives such as creosote, pentachlorophenol, or copper-chrome-arsenate.

Undefined terms shall be given their usual and ordinary meaning within the context of the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7403, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 4, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 3, p. 156; am. 1996, ch. 419, § 1, p. 1389; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 69, p. 253; am. 2007, ch. 83, § 8, p. 221.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of environmental quality,§ 39-107.

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 83, deleted former subsection (50)(h), which read: “Radioactive wastes, defined in the radiation and nuclear materials act, chapter 30, title 39, Idaho Code” and made a related redesignation.

Federal References.

The atomic energy act of 1954, referred to in the introductory paragraph in subsection (50), is compiled as 42 USCS § 2011 et seq.

Subtitle C of the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA), referred to in subsection (22), is compiled as 42 USCS § 6921 et seq.

Subtitle D of the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA), referred to in subsection (31), is codified as 42 USCS § 6941 et seq.

Section 404 of the federal clean air act (PL 25-217), referred to in paragraph (50)(f), is codified as 33 U.S.C.S. § 1344.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “injection well” is not defined under 40 C.F.R. § 257.2. However, a definition may be found at 40 C.F.R. § 260.10.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

A.L.R.

A.L.R. — What Constitutes Solid Waste Subject to Regulation under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.). 83 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 235.

§ 39-7404. Consistency with federal law — Status of appendices.

The legislature intends that the state of Idaho enact and carry out a solid waste program that will enable the state to achieve approved state status with respect to solid waste disposal facility regulation from the federal government.

The legislature finds that subtitle D of RCRA, and in particular the code of federal regulations, title 40, part 257 and 258, establish complex, detailed and costly provisions for the disposal of solid waste. By the provisions of this chapter, the legislature desires to avoid duplicative or conflicting state and federal regulatory systems and allow local MSWLF unit owners the maximum flexibility possible under 40 CFR 257 and 258, to meet the substantive goals of protection of human health and the environment with consideration for actual site and climatic conditions. At any time that 40 CFR 257 or 40 CFR 258 is amended, any additional flexibility or extension otherwise prohibited by this chapter shall be allowed as applicable.

The board may not promulgate any rule pursuant to this act that would impose conditions or requirements more stringent or broader in scope than the referenced RCRA regulations of the United States environmental protection agency or the provisions of this chapter. Until regulations are adopted, agency conclusions in appendix B through appendix H, inclusive, per the “Federal Register” of October 9, 1991, shall be used for technical guidance for relevant provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7404, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 5, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 4, p. 156.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

Subtitle D of the resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA), referred to in the second paragraph, is codified as 42 USCS § 6941 et seq.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), referred to in the second and third paragraphs of this section, is compiled as 42 USCS § 6901 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in the third paragraph was added to this section by S.L. 1993, ch. 139, which is codified as§§ 39-105, 39-414, 39-7401 to 39-7404, 39-7406 to 39-7408, and 39-7409 to 39-7420. The term is probably meant to refer to “this chapter,” being chapter 74, title 39, Idaho Code.

§ 39-7405. Authority regarding solid waste.

The local government entity with legal responsibility for disposal of solid waste pursuant to the provisions of chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code, shall have full authority to manage and control the ownership, disposition and ultimate disposal of solid waste within its jurisdiction. It is the intention of the legislature that this grant of authority shall be construed in manner commensurate with the full extent of the duties established in chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7405, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972.

§ 39-7406. Respective roles of county, director and health district — Liberal construction.

  1. The county, director and health district each perform key roles in statewide solid waste management. Principal jurisdiction for the various functions of solid waste regulation and management as it pertains to site selection, development, operation, and closure shall be carried out as outlined herein:
    1. Each county may select a solid waste landfill site or sites, evaluate said site(s) for compliance with site certification criteria, develop design plans for construction and operation of MSWLF unit(s), including ground water monitoring programs, provide for public review of its site certification, facility design and operation plans through the conduct of a twenty-eight (28) day public comment period, publish legal notices, serve as the repository of funds established for financial assurance, cooperate with the director and district to construct and operate a solid waste disposal system which protects human health and the environment, and perform such other solid waste related duties as may be specified in chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code;
    2. The director shall interact and cooperate with federal agencies to secure approved state status concerning solid waste programs, administer the site selection process by requiring an owner to certify, through such professional documentation as may be required in this chapter, that the site is not encumbered by critical site limitations as set forth in section 39-7407, Idaho Code, ascertaining that such certification has been made by a qualified professional, review and approve MSWLF unit design plans, the ground water monitoring program, alternative daily cover and final cover, alternative closure and post-closure care requirements recommended to the director for approval by the district, financial assurance and any other approvals required in 40 CFR 258, prepare and/or adopt such regulations as may be necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter, and cooperate in actual site monitoring and corrective action programs; and
    3. The health district shall ascertain that operations standards are met, prepare and/or adopt technical guidance, review and recommend approval of alternative operating, closure and post-closure requirements to the director, and review and enforce all aspects of operation, closure and post closure except as specified above.
    4. All approvals required by 40 CFR 258 shall be obtained by the owner and/or applicant; and all provisions of 40 CFR 258 which provide for flexibility may be obtained by the owner and/or applicant; and the director shall have the authority to grant all such approvals in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the duty to make a determination that an application meets standards or provides an acceptable alternative, and the duty to approve or disapprove the application in a timely manner prescribed in this chapter.
  2. This chapter shall be liberally construed to allow these public entities having jurisdiction to perform their respective roles to protect human health and the environment through expeditious and technically proper solid waste management practices, while recognizing the authority of local governments to act in their governmental capacity to perform the duties prescribed in chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7406, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 6, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 5, p. 156.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-7407. Location restrictions — Site certification.

  1. The following location restrictions shall apply to all new MSWLF units, existing MSWLF units, and lateral expansions. Existing sites that cannot demonstrate compliance with the following standards for airports, floodplains, or unstable areas, must close by October 9, 1996, except as otherwise provided in 40 CFR 258.16.
  2. All MSWLF units to which this chapter is applicable shall meet the following locational standards:
    1. Shall not be located proximate to an airport runway except as provided in 40 CFR 258.10;
    2. Shall not be located in areas designated by the United States fish and wildlife service or the Idaho department of fish and game as critical habitat for endangered or threatened species of plants, fish, or wildlife, or designated as critical migratory routes for protectively managed species;
    3. Shall not be located so that the active portion is closer than two hundred (200) feet to the property line of adjacent land;
    4. Shall not be located so as to be at variance with any locally adopted land use plan or zoning requirement unless otherwise provided by local law or ordinance, provided that if no land use plan has been adopted by the local government which would have land use jurisdiction pursuant to chapter 65, title 67, Idaho Code, the site certification shall contain an analysis of the factors outlined in section 67-6508, Idaho Code, accompanied by findings and conclusions, setting forth the reasons therefore, entered by the local government with jurisdiction after a public hearing in accord with provisions of section 67-6509, Idaho Code, that the public interest would be served by locating a solid waste landfill on the site for which certification is sought;
    5. Shall not be located so that the active portion is any closer than one thousand (1,000) feet to any state or national park, or land reserved or withdrawn for scenic or natural use;
    6. Shall not be located within a one hundred (100) year flood plain except as provided in 40 CFR 258.11;
    7. Shall not be located in wetlands, except as provided in 40 CFR 258.12;
    8. A MSWLF unit active portion shall not be located:
    9. within three hundred (300) feet or the distance of the point of compliance, whichever is greater, upstream of a perennial stream, or river; and
      1. A MSWLF unit active portion shall not be located where the integrity of the site would be compromised by the presence of ground water which would interfere with construction or operation of the site;
    10. A MSWLF unit shall not be located:
      1. within two hundred (200) feet of a holocene fault as defined in 40 CFR 258.13 or adjacent to geologic features which could compromise the structural integrity of the MSWLF unit; and
      2. within seismic impact zones except as provided in 40 CFR 258.14; and
History.

(k) A MSWLF unit active portion shall not be located on any site whose natural state would be considered unstable in that its undisturbed character would not permit establishment of an MSWLF unit without unduly threatening the integrity of the design due to inherent site instability. The provisions of 40 CFR 258.15 shall be followed. History.

I.C.,§ 39-7407, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 7, p. 342.

CASE NOTES

Evidence Inadmissible.

In action concerning open meetings law and review of an agency action brought pursuant to the administrative procedures act concerning site selection of a landfill, the district court erred in allowing county commissioners to supplement its record with findings of fact regarding compliance with local land use plan where the parties did not make any allegations that there was a procedural irregularity. Petersen v. Franklin County, 130 Idaho 176, 938 P.2d 1214 (1997).

§ 39-7408. Site certification procedure.

  1. It shall be the responsibility of each applicant to obtain site certification from the director. The site certification process is hereby established to ascertain compliance with the requirements of section 39-7407, Idaho Code.
  2. The site certification procedure shall be administered in the following manner:
    1. Prior to submittal of the application, the applicant may conduct a site tour for the director, health district and all other public agencies with jurisdiction to familiarize the agencies with characteristics of the site and site surroundings.
    2. The applicant may then submit an application to the director. The application shall address each of the criteria set forth in section 39-7407, Idaho Code, explaining the technical findings regarding each.
    3. Wherever technical evaluation of relevant information is required, a qualified professional, as appropriate, shall certify compliance with the requisite criteria.
    4. When the application is submitted to the director, the applicant shall publish legal notice of submittal of the application in the newspaper published in the county as determined by the criteria in section 31-819, Idaho Code, and shall make the application available for public inspection and copying. The date of publication of such notice shall begin a twenty-eight (28) day comment period during which written comments concerning the application may be submitted to the director.
    5. The director shall act upon the application within twenty-one (21) days of the end of the comment period set forth above and shall enter a decision either certifying the site or rejecting the application. The director shall review the site certification application, not contravening the opinion of the applicant’s qualified professional(s) without reliable empirical evidence that the affirmations in the application are erroneous. Upon finding that the criteria of section 39-7407, Idaho Code, have been affirmed by qualified professionals, the director shall certify the site. Any rejection of a site certification application shall be accompanied by findings in writing expressly stating the criteria insufficiently documented and/or violated and the evidence relied upon in making such determination. Failure of the director to act within twenty-one (21) days shall constitute site certification. An applicant shall be provided an opportunity to appeal any denial of certification.
    6. Site certification is transferable with ownership of the site.
    7. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of certification from the director, the applicant shall publish notice in the newspaper provided for in subsection (d) of this section, informing the public that certification of the site has been approved.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7408, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 8, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

Time Limitations.

Time for filing a petition for review of county commissioner’s landfill site selection was tolled because the minutes of meeting where final site selection was made never used the word “final”, the landowners never knew the decision was final and the statement the commissioners would like comments concerning the decisions within 30 days led landowners to believe that they had 30 days in which to object, rather than twenty-eight days, and because commissioners failed to publish the decision as required by subsection (d) and landowners were still attempting to exhaust their administrative remedies following the meeting. Petersen v. Franklin County, 130 Idaho 176, 938 P.2d 1214 (1997).

§ 39-7408A. Site certification procedure for commercial solid waste facilities.

In addition to obtaining site certification as provided in section 39-7408, Idaho Code, no owner or operator of a commercial solid waste facility shall construct, expand or enlarge such a facility without a siting license from the director. Commercial solid waste facilities constructed and in operation on the effective date of this section are not required to obtain a siting license except to expand or enlarge such facilities.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7408A, as added by 1996, ch. 419, § 2, p. 1389.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this section” refers to the effective date of S.L. 1996, ch. 419, which was March 20, 1996.

§ 39-7408B. Site review panels — Members, chairman, quorum, meetings, staff.

  1. A site review panel shall be established to insure public input in the licensing process, to recommend to the director conditions which should be included in a siting license and to recommend to the director whether a particular facility should or should not be constructed, expanded or enlarged.
  2. A panel shall consist of eight (8) members to be appointed as follows:
    1. Three (3) members shall be the director of the department of environmental quality or his designee, the director of the Idaho transportation department or his designee and the director of the department of water resources or his designee.
    2. One (1) member shall be a public member appointed by the governor. The public member shall be an environmental professional, shall serve as chairman of the panel and shall be a voting member. A member who is a public member shall be appointed to serve on site review panels only until the particular siting license application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    3. Two (2) members shall be appointed by the city council of the city located closest to or in which the commercial solid waste facility is proposed to be located, at least one (1) of whom shall be a resident of the city. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular siting license application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    4. Two (2) members shall be appointed by the county commission and be residents of the county where the commercial solid waste facility is proposed to be located. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular siting license application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    5. A person nominated to represent a city or county shall not have a conflict of interest, as that term is defined in section 74-403, Idaho Code, or derive any economic gain as that term is defined in section 74-403, Idaho Code, from the location or siting of the proposed commercial solid waste facility.
  3. The director shall notify the city council of the nearest city and the board of county commissioners of a siting license application filed with the department, and shall instruct the city and county to appoint the necessary members to a panel.
  4. Five (5) of the eight (8) members of the panel shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business of the panel and the concurrence of five (5) members of the panel shall constitute a legal action of the panel, provided that no meeting of the panel shall occur unless there are at least as many members present representing the city and county as there are representing the state and the public as appointed pursuant to subsections (2)(a) and (b) of this section. All meetings of the panel shall be conducted pursuant to the state open meeting law.
  5. The director shall make staff available to assist a panel in carrying out its responsibilities.
  6. Members of the panel who are not state employees shall be entitled to receive compensation as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7408B, as added by 1996, ch. 419, § 2, p. 1389; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 70, p. 253; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 98, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of environmental quality,§ 39-105.

Director of department of water resources,§ 42-1701.

Director of Idaho transportation department,§ 40-503.

Open meetings law,§ 74-201 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “74-403” for “59-703” in two instances in paragraph (2)(e).

§ 39-7408C. Siting license application — Fee — Rules.

  1. An application for a siting license shall include:
    1. The name and residence of the applicant;
    2. The location of the proposed commercial solid waste facility;
    3. Engineering, hydrogeologic and air quality information to indicate compliance with technical criteria as may be provided by law;
    4. A description of the types of wastes proposed to be handled at the facility;
    5. Information showing that harm to scenic, public health, historic, cultural or recreational values is not substantial or can be mitigated;
    6. Information showing that the risk and impact of accident during transportation of solid waste is not substantial or can be mitigated;
    7. Information showing that the impact on local government is not adverse regarding health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development or can be mitigated;
    8. Financial information to indicate the applicant’s financial capability to construct, operate and close a commercial solid waste facility.
  2. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the application, the director shall determine whether it is complete. If it is not complete, the director shall notify the applicant and state the areas of deficiency.
  3. The application shall be accompanied by a siting license fee. The director shall establish by rule the scale for determining the siting license application fee. The fee shall not exceed seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) and shall be based on the cost to the department of reviewing the siting license application. The scale shall be based on characteristics including the site size, projected waste volume, and hydrogeological and atmospheric characteristics surrounding the site. Fees received pursuant to this section may be expended by the director to pay the actual, reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the department in acting upon a siting license application.
  4. The director shall promulgate rules in compliance with chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, to implement the provisions of this section.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7408C, as added by 1996, ch. 419, § 2, p. 1389.

§ 39-7408D. Duties of the director relative to siting applications.

  1. Upon receipt of a complete siting license application, the director or an authorized representative of the director shall:
    1. Notify the permanent panel members, the city and/or county in which the commercial solid waste facility is located or proposed to be located, the director of the department of fish and game, the director of the Idaho state police, and other state agencies as deemed appropriate by the director.
    2. Publish a notice that the application has been received, as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code, in a newspaper having major circulation in the county and the immediate vicinity of the proposed commercial solid waste facility. The notice shall contain a map indicating the location of the proposed commercial solid waste facility, a description of the proposed action and the location where the application may be reviewed. The notice shall describe the procedure by which the siting license may be granted.
  2. Upon notification by the director, the chairman shall immediately notify the representatives of the state to the panel and the public members. The chairman shall also notify the applicable county and city for their appointment of members as provided in subsection (2) of section 39-7408B, Idaho Code. Within thirty (30) days after the notification, the board of commissioners of the county and the city council shall select the members to serve on the panel. The panel shall be created at that time and notification of the creation of the panel shall be made to the chairman.
  3. Within thirty (30) days after appointment of panel members, the panel shall meet to review and establish a timetable for the consideration of the draft site license.
  4. The panel shall:
    1. Set a date and arrange for publication of notice of a public hearing in a newspaper having major circulation in the vicinity of the proposed site, at its first meeting. The public notice shall:
      1. Contain a map indicating the location of the proposed commercial solid waste facility, a description of the proposed action, and the location where the application for a siting license may be reviewed and where copies may be obtained;
      2. Identify the time, place and location for the public hearing held to receive public comment and input on the application for a siting license;
    2. Publish the notice not less than thirty (30) days before the date of the public hearing and the notice shall be, at a minimum, a twenty (20) days’ notice as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code.
  5. Comment and input on the proposed commercial solid waste facility may be presented orally or in writing at the public hearing, and shall continue to be accepted in writing by the panel for thirty (30) days after the public hearing date. The public hearing shall be held in the same county as the proposed site. If the proposed site is adjacent to a city or populated area in a neighboring county, it is recommended that public hearings also be held in the neighboring county.
  6. The panel shall consider, but not be limited to, the following:
    1. The risk of the spread of disease or impact upon public health from improper treatment, storage, or incineration methods;
    2. The impact on local units of government where the proposed commercial solid waste facility is to be located in terms of health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development. The panel shall also consider city and county ordinances, permits or other requirements and their potential relationship to the proposed commercial solid waste facility;
    3. The nature of the probable environmental and public health impact;
    4. The financial capability of the applicant to construct, operate and close the commercial solid waste facility.
  7. The panel shall consider the concerns and objections submitted by the public. The panel shall facilitate efforts to provide that the concerns and objections are mitigated by proposing additional conditions regarding the construction of the commercial solid waste facility. The panel may propose conditions which integrate the provisions of the city or county ordinances, permits or requirements.
  8. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after creation, the panel shall recommend to the director that the license be issued, issued with conditions, or rejected. The director shall act on a license application within sixty (60) days after receipt of the panel’s recommendation. If the panel recommends conditions, a clear statement of the need for a condition must be submitted to the director. If the panel recommends rejection, a clear statement of the reasons for the denial must be submitted to the director.
  9. The director shall issue, issue with conditions or reject a siting license only as recommended by the siting panel. The director may reconvene a siting panel and request reconsideration of its original recommendation prior to the director’s final action.
  10. An applicant or any person aggrieved by a decision of the director pursuant to this chapter may within sixty (60) days of the director’s decision, and, after all remedies have been exhausted under the provisions of this chapter, seek judicial review under the procedures provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, and may also seek de novo judicial review.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7408D, as added by 1996, ch. 419, § 2, p. 1389; am. 2000, ch. 469, § 102, p. 1450.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of fish and game,§ 36-106.

Director of Idaho state police,§ 67-2901.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 1996, ch. 419 declared an emergency. Approved March 20, 1996.

§ 39-7409. Standards for design.

  1. Applicability. These standards apply to new MSWLF units and lateral expansions of existing facilities as provided in 40 CFR 258.40.
  2. Liner designs. All owners or operators of MSWLF units shall use one (1) of the following designs:
    1. Composite liner design. A liner as provided under 40 CFR 258.40(b) and shall include a leachate collection system as provided under 40 CFR 258.40(a)(2); or
    2. Alternate liner design. A site-specific design based upon environmental performance, as allowed under 40 CFR 258.40(a)(1) which will ensure that the concentration values listed in table 1, 40 CFR 258.40, or as amended, will not be exceeded in the uppermost aquifer at the relevant point of compliance. This design shall demonstrate consideration of site specific factors as provided in 40 CFR 258.40(c) and shall include a leachate collection system as provided under 40 CFR 258.40(a)(2); or
    3. Arid design. A site-specific design based upon environmental performance, as allowed under 40 CFR 258.40(a)(1) which will ensure that the concentration values listed in table 1, 40 CFR 258.40, or as amended, will not be exceeded in the uppermost aquifer at the relevant point of compliance. This design shall use both field collected data and predictions that maximize contaminant migration for demonstrating no potential for migration. This design will apply to locations having less than twenty-five (25) inches of precipitation annually, net evaporative losses greater than thirty (30) inches annually, and holding capacity in native soils greater than annual absorbance; and
      1. solid waste is deposited no less than fifty (50) feet above the seasonal high level of ground water in the uppermost aquifer;
      2. the geologic formation beneath the site and above the uppermost aquifer must have capillary capacities greater than the projected maximum volume of leachate generated during the active life of the MSWLF unit; and
      3. “no potential for migration” is demonstrated when the geologic formation beneath the site and above the uppermost aquifer has sufficient hydrogeological characteristics and holding capacity adequate to contain all hazardous constituents generated during the active life, closure and post-closure care periods.
  3. Point of compliance. For each MSWLF unit, the relevant point of compliance shall be set by a qualified professional by criteria contained in 40 CFR 258.40(d)(1) through (d)(8), inclusive, subject to approval by the director.
  4. Leachate discharge shall comply with permitted discharge requirements under the federal clean water act (PL 95-217) and federal storm water discharge regulations (40 CFR part 122).
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7409, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 9, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

The federal clean water act, referred to in subsection (4) of this section, is compiled as 33 USCS § 1251 et seq.

§ 39-7410. Ground water monitoring design.

  1. Applicability. These requirements apply to MSWLF units except:
    1. When the MSWLF unit meets the conditions for exemption in 40 CFR 258.1(f); provided however, that the director may, at his discretion, require monitoring of a MSWLF unit which meets the conditions for exemption in 40 CFR 258.1(f), if necessary to protect ground water resources. If the director does require ground water monitoring of such MSWLF unit, a method other than the ground water monitoring wells required in this section and in 40 CFR 258.51 through 258.55 may be used to detect a release of contamination from the unit; or
    2. When suspended upon demonstration in accordance with 40 CFR 258.50 that there is no potential for migration of hazardous constituents from the MSWLF unit to the uppermost aquifer during the active life of the unit and the post-closure care periods when certified by a qualified professional and approved by the director.
  2. Ground water monitoring program. All monitoring programs shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the guidance of relevant portions of appendix F per the “Federal Register” of October 9, 1991. The schedule for compliance as provided by 40 CFR 258.50 shall apply unless an alternative schedule is approved by the director.
    1. A ground water monitoring system must be installed that consists of a sufficient number of wells, installed at appropriate locations and depths, to conform with the requirements of 40 CFR 258.51(a) and (d).
    2. A multiunit ground water monitoring system may be constructed instead of separate ground water monitoring systems for each MSWLF unit as provided in 40 CFR 258.51(b).
    3. Monitoring wells must be cased in a manner that maintains the integrity of the monitoring well bore hole as provided in 40 CFR 258.51(c). Wells must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent contamination of the samples, the sampled strata, and between aquifers and water bearing strata, and in accordance with Idaho department of water resources, well construction standards and the monitoring well standards of the national ground water association.
  3. Point of compliance. For each MSWLF unit, the relevant point of compliance shall be set as a function of site and monitoring program design subject to the approval of the director. The relevant point of compliance for purposes of MSWLF unit design, well location and corrective action shall be:
    1. Located within the flow pathway(s) predicted from the results of the hydrogeologic investigation;
    2. No more than one hundred fifty (150) meters downgradient from the waste management unit boundary;
    3. On contiguous property owned, or otherwise subject to possessory rights by the MSWLF owner;
    4. Shall be identified by the qualified professional on all reports and documents pertaining to analysis of ground water protection measures; and
    5. Determined in consideration of factors provided in 40 CFR 258.40(d).
  4. Ground water characterization, sampling and analysis requirements.
    1. The ground water monitoring system must include sampling and analysis procedures consistent with 40 CFR 258.53.
    2. Monitoring wells shall be tested for the constituents listed in 40 CFR 258, appendix I, plus temperature, unless otherwise authorized by the director as provided in 40 CFR 258.54.
    3. Background values will be based on an independent sample from each well sampled at three (3) month intervals in a one (1) year period.
  5. Detection monitoring program.
    1. Detection monitoring is required throughout the active life and post-closure care period at MSWLF units as provided in 40 CFR 258.54 at all ground water monitoring wells as defined in 40 CFR 258.51(a)(1) and (a)(2) for constituents listed in 40 CFR 258, appendix I.
    2. Each well shall be monitored on a semiannual basis after background characterization. Alternative constituents and sampling frequency may be approved by the director based upon considerations as defined in 40 CFR 258.54(a)(2) and (b). Requests for alternative constituents or frequency shall be based on a report certified by a qualified professional.
    3. Each ground water sample event must include a determination of the ground water surface elevation, flow direction and rate.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7413, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. and redesig. 1993, ch. 139, § 11, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 6, p. 156; am. 1997, ch. 11, § 1, p. 11.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-7410, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-7410, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972, was repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 139, § 10, effective March 25, 1993.

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-7413.

The Idaho department of water resources well construction standards, referred to in paragraph (2)(c), may be found at Idaho Administrative Code § 37.03.09.

The national groundwater association, referred to in paragraph (2)(c), provides guidance on management and protection of groundwater resources. See http://ngwa.org .

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 1997, ch. 11 declared an emergency. Approved February 7, 1997.

§ 39-7411. Design review procedure.

  1. Design of a MSWLF unit shall not be reviewed until site certification has been obtained. After obtaining site certification, an applicant shall produce design plans and specifications which comply with the design standards set forth in sections 39-7409 and 39-7410, Idaho Code. The responsibility for complying with said standards shall rest solely with the applicant of the site.
  2. An applicant may notify the director of its intent to initiate a MSWLF site design and meet with the director to discuss standards, schedule, design process to be used and particular concerns of the director.
  3. The applicant shall conduct aerial and cadastral surveys, relevant studies, and prepare a hydrogeologic report which will satisfy standards and other provisions in accordance with this chapter and applicable state regulations. Specific climatic data and verification of location restrictions shall be included.
  4. The applicant shall submit findings and a tentative design plan, including preliminary schematic design of environmental monitoring systems to the director as a result of the preliminary design investigation. The submittal initiates a twenty-eight (28) day period for department review and comment. Concurrent with the submittal to the director, the applicant shall publish notice in a newspaper of general circulation, as determined by the criteria in section 31-819, Idaho Code, in the county wherein the MSWLF would be located notifying the public that a preliminary design plan has been submitted to the director and is available for public review. The date of publication initiates a twenty-eight (28) day period for department review and public comment. Written public comments concerning the proposed design plan shall be compiled by the director. The compiled public comments received by the director and those generated by the director shall be transmitted to the owner, and the applicant if other than the owner, no more than thirty-five (35) days after the date of publication of the notice or seven (7) days after the end of the public comment period, whichever is later.
  5. When a response is received from the director, the applicant may submit the facility design, ground water monitoring program, and specifications, in a final design report which addresses standards established by this chapter, applicable federal regulations and other relevant provisions of state law. Said submittal shall include a site-specific analysis of hydrogeologic conditions, location restrictions and other factors relevant to long-term site integrity, and shall address comments from the public and the director related to objective standards in the final design report. Said submittal shall be prepared by a qualified professional in a manner consistent with sound professional practices. The submittal of this final design report initiates a fifty-six (56) day period for the director’s review.
  6. Concurrent with submittal to the director, the applicant shall release the final design report, including all supporting reports, plans and documentation, to the extent practicable, for public comment by placing it for inspection at every public library within the county where the proposed MSWLF would be located. Copies of the submittal shall be made available for possession, at the cost of duplication, at a public location in the county seat of the county where the proposed MSWLF unit would be located. The applicant shall publish notice in a newspaper of general circulation, as determined by the criteria in section 31-819, Idaho Code, in the county wherein the MSWLF would be located notifying the public that a final design report has been submitted to the director and is available for public review. Public comments shall be submitted, in writing, to the director within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of publication. (7) No more than fifty-six (56) days after publication of notice of submittal, or twenty-eight (28) days after the close of an advertised public comment period, whichever is later, the director shall enter a decision either approving or disapproving the final design. The decision shall be in writing and shall make one (1) of the following findings:
  7. No more than fifty-six (56) days after publication of notice of submittal, or twenty-eight (28) days after the close of an advertised public comment period, whichever is later, the director shall enter a decision either approving or disapproving the final design. The decision shall be in writing and shall make one (1) of the following findings:
    1. Based upon the information submitted, design complies with applicable standards.
    2. Based upon the information submitted, the design does not comply with applicable standards, setting forth with specificity the material standards not met or insufficiently documented.
    3. Failure to comport with professional standards.
  8. Upon entering a decision of disapproval, an automatic twenty-one (21) day stay of proceedings shall occur unless waived by the applicant. During the twenty-one (21) day stay, the director and the applicant may meet and confer to attempt to reconcile differences. At any point during that twenty-one (21) day period the director and applicant can reach an accord and approval can be granted, with construction authorized at that point. The applicant can tender a written waiver of this twenty-one (21) day reconciliation period which would initiate the requirement provided for in subsection (9) of this section. At any time in the review process or post-decision reconciliation process the applicant and director may mutually agree to extend the timeframes contained herein and may resort to mediation, arbitration, or binding arbitration to resolve differences as they mutually see fit.
  9. If differences are not reconciled in the period set forth in subsection (8) of this section, the director shall notify the owner that the design remains disapproved. Said notice of disapproval shall incorporate the rationale for disapproval contained in the original decision of disapproval, deleting any issues resolved in the post-decision reconciliation period.
  10. Following final action by the director the applicant may file a petition with the district court, with concurrent notice to the director, in the county where the proposed MSWLF would be located for expedited appellate review of the director’s decision. The petition shall set forth the specific basis for the appeal and shall identify the legal and factual basis for contesting the disapproval by the director. The director shall submit a copy of the entire record upon which its disapproval has been based no more than fourteen (14) days after the date the applicant’s petition for review has been filed. Only information which has been available during the design review process may be used in the judicial review process.
  11. All issues claimed as a basis of appeal by the applicant shall be addressed in a memorandum filed with the petition appealing disapproval by the director. The director shall submit a reply memorandum no later than fourteen (14) days after the applicant’s petition for review has been filed.
  12. Upon the record, the applicable law, the memoranda of the respective parties, and such independent technical assistance as the court may find it necessary and appropriate to retain, the court shall evaluate the applicant’s petition and the decision by the director and shall render a decision no more than twenty-one (21) days after the completed record, and accompanying memorandum, if one is filed, are submitted to the court by the director. The court shall sustain the director’s disapproval action if it affirmatively finds that the record contains substantial evidence that the design does not comply with standards as specified pursuant to section 39-7412(7)(b) or (c), Idaho Code. If the court finds the disapproval is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, it shall reverse the director’s action and remand the matter to the director with appropriate instructions. (13) The procedure set forth in subsections (10) through (12) of this section are effective until January 1, 1994. On and after January 1, 1994, the applicant is entitled to judicial review pursuant to chapter 67, title 52 [chapter 52, title 67], Idaho Code. Upon waiver or expiration of the twenty-one (21) day reconciliation period, the director and the applicant shall stipulate to accelerated judicial review pursuant to court approval where the ordinary review period provided in chapter 67, title 52 [chapter 52, title 67], Idaho Code, may reasonably result in substantial increased costs to the applicant, potential violations of federal or state environmental laws or threats to the public health and environment.

Failure of the director to respond to an applicant’s request for approval in the manner provided herein shall constitute approval of the request. Construction shall not be initiated on a MSWLF unit until approval has been granted, except that construction prior to approval may be initiated prior to July 1, 1993, for a MSWLF unit which meets the design standard of section 39-7409(2)(a), Idaho Code. The applicant shall publish notice of approval in a newspaper of general circulation when affirmative or defacto [ de facto ] approval is given.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7411, as added by 1993, ch. 139, § 12, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-7411 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-7412 by § 13 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139.

The bracketed insertion near the end of subsection (7) was added by the compiler to correct the legal term.

The bracketed references “chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code,” contained in subsection (13), were inserted by the compiler to correct the statutory reference.

§ 39-7412. Standards for operation.

Owners or operators of all MSWLF units shall:

  1. Implement a program for detecting and preventing disposal of regulated hazardous wastes as provided in 40 CFR 258.20;
  2. Provide for daily cover as provided in 40 CFR 258.21. Alternative materials or cover frequency other than daily cover may be used only as specified by the MSWLF plan of operation;
  3. Provide disease vector control as provided in 40 CFR 258.22;
  4. Implement a program of routine methane monitoring and control as provided in 40 CFR 258.23;
  5. Ensure that MSWLF units do not violate any ambient air quality standard or emission standard from any emission of landfill gases, combustion or any other emission associated with a MSWLF unit as provided in 40 CFR 258.24;
  6. Provide and control access as provided in 40 CFR 258.25;
  7. Design, construct and maintain a run-on/run-off control system as provided in 40 CFR 258.26 to:
    1. Prevent all the run-on of surface waters and other liquids resulting from a maximum flow of a twenty-five (25) year storm, or snowmelt into the active portion of the MSWLF unit;
    2. Control the collection of the run-off of surface waters and other liquids resulting from a twenty-four (24) hour, twenty-five (25) year storm, or snowmelt, whichever is greater, from the active portion and the closed portions of a MSWLF unit; and
    3. Prevent the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States and the state of Idaho as defined in 40 CFR 258.27;
  8. Prohibit the disposal of noncontainerized liquids or sludges containing free liquids in MSWLF units except as provided in 40 CFR 258.28;
  9. Establish an operating and recordkeeping procedure as provided in 40 CFR 258.29; and
  10. Comply with operating procedures established by the board for implementation by the districts which are intended to assure operations which protect the public health and maintain the integrity of the landfill design.
  11. MSWLF units that dispose of greater than twenty (20) tons per day of municipal solid waste based on an annual average shall:
    1. Monitor daily climatic conditions. Monitoring shall include precipitation including snow, evaporation, evaporative water temperature, air temperature, wind speed and direction; and
    2. Weigh all incoming waste or provide an equivalent method of measuring waste tonnage capable of estimating total annual solid waste tonnage.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7411, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. and redesig. 1993, ch. 139, § 13, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-7411.

Former§ 39-7412 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-7413 by § 14 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139.

CASE NOTES

Negligence per se.

In a suit by guardians of children who were killed in a landfill accident against the county operating the landfill, the district court erred in determining that the county’s violations were not negligence per se and by applying the common law willful or wanton standard. O’Guin v. Bingham County, 142 Idaho 49, 122 P.3d 308 (2005).

§ 39-7413. Operations plan review.

  1. Prior to operation of a MSWLF unit, an operations plan shall be submitted to the health district with jurisdiction. It shall be the responsibility of each applicant of a MSWLF unit to certify to the health district that the provisions of section 39-7412, Idaho Code, have been complied with through development of an operating plan. No solid waste disposal facility shall accept waste without a current operating certificate from the health district with jurisdiction.
  2. The health district shall review operational plans in the same manner as the director reviews requests for site certification pursuant to section 39-7408, Idaho Code. An applicant shall provide information in the operations plan in sufficient detail to show compliance with the provisions of section 39-7412, Idaho Code, and required procedures adopted pursuant thereto. The same standards of review shall apply to an operations plan as apply to the site certification process. The health district shall accept certification by a qualified professional that standards of operation have been met upon presentation of the professional’s certification of compliance and presentation of a written explanation of operational practices which will be undertaken to meet standards established in section 39-7412, Idaho Code.
  3. If an operations plan provides for alternative operating criteria requiring approval by the director as provided in 40 CFR 258, the health district shall make a decision recommending approval or disapproval. Such plan shall be submitted by the health district to the director for his review. The submittal shall be accompanied by findings of fact and the recommendation from the health district.
  4. The director shall review the recommendation submitted by the health districts and shall make a decision to approve or disapprove. The director shall review recommendations for approval using the same standards of review provided in section 39-7408(2)(e), Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7412, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. and redesig. 1993, ch. 139, § 14, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 7, p. 156.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

This section was formerly compiled as§ 39-7412.

Former§ 39-7413 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-7410 by § 11 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139.

§ 39-7414. Assessment monitoring and corrective action.

  1. Applicability. These standards apply whenever a statistically significant increase over background has been detected for one (1) or more constituents listed in 40 CFR 258, appendix I or an alternative list approved in accordance with 40 CFR 258.54(a)(2).
  2. Assessment monitoring programs shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.55.
  3. Assessment of corrective measures shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.56.
  4. Selection of remedy shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.57.
  5. Implementation of corrective action program shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.58.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7414, as added by 1993, ch. 139, § 15, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§ 39-7414, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-7414, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972, was repealed by S.L. 1993, ch. 139, § 10, effective March 25, 1993.

§ 39-7415. Standards for closure.

  1. Applicability. These standards apply to all MSWLF units that receive wastes on or after October 9, 1993, except as provided by 40 CFR 258. MSWLF units that accept waste after October 9, 1991, but cease to accept waste prior to October 9, 1993, shall at a minimum comply with subsections (2)(a) and (3) of this section in addition to the “sanitary landfill closure guidance” criteria as adopted by the health district.
  2. Cover designs. Owners or operators of MSWLF units shall install one (1) of the following final cover systems:
    1. A cover as provided under 40 CFR 258.60(a); or
    2. The cover material must be fine-grained with intrinsic permeability no greater than 1 X 10-3 cm/sec and a minimum thickness of twenty-four (24) inches; and
      1. Have capillary holding capacity greater than the projected maximum accumulated volume of water as determined by utilization of accepted water balance methodology based on local or regional twenty-five (25) year climatic records;
      2. Annual precipitation is less than twenty-five (25) inches with net evaporative losses greater than thirty (30) inches annually;
      3. The top six (6) inches of the cover shall be capable of sustaining shallow rooted native plant growth; and
      4. This design shall demonstrate consideration of site specific factors as provided in 40 CFR 258.60(b); or
    3. As provided in 40 CFR 258.60(b).
  3. The final grade of slopes shall be greater than two percent (2%) unless otherwise supported by the post closure plan and uses approved by the health district, and the grade of side slopes not more than thirty-three percent (33%).
  4. Closure plan preparation, placement in operating record, notice of intent to close, time requirements for commencement and completion of closure activities, certification, deed notation and removal of deed notation shall be conducted as provided in 40 CFR 258.60(c) through (j), inclusive. The deed notation and removal of deed notation shall comply with the uniform environmental covenants act, chapter 30, title 55, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7415, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 16, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 8, p. 156; am. 2010, ch. 99, § 2, p. 191.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 99, added the last sentence in subsection (4).

§ 39-7416. Standards for post closure care.

  1. Applicability. Post closure maintenance standards apply to all MSWLF units that receive wastes on or after October 9, 1993, except as provided by 40 CFR 258.1.
  2. Post closure care shall be conducted as provided under 40 CFR 258.61.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7416, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 17, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 9, p. 156.

§ 39-7417. Financial assurance for closure, post closure care and corrective action.

  1. Applicability. These requirements shall apply to new MSWLF units, existing MSWLF units and lateral expansions except as exempted in 40 CFR 258.1(d) and 258.70(a).
  2. The requirements of this section are effective April 9, 1995, except for MSWLF units meeting the conditions of 40 CFR 258.1(f)(1), in which case the effective date is October 9, 1995, or at such later date upon subsequent amendment of 40 CFR 258.70 through 258.74.
  3. All MSWLF units shall be underwritten by financial assurance provisions as provided by the following:
    1. Closure as provided in 40 CFR 258.71;
    2. Post closure care as provided in 40 CFR 258.72; and
    3. Corrective action as provided in 40 CFR 258.73.
  4. The financial assurance mechanisms provided for MSWLF units shall include any mechanism or a combination of mechanisms meeting the criteria of 40 CFR 258.74.
  5. Counties may use available borrowing capability through registered warrants for a prearranged amount and preapproved by a lending institution as a financial mechanism to assure assessment monitoring and corrective action needs.
  6. Subdivisions of the state may use any method provided by law to meet the requirements of this section.
  7. MSWLF units owned or operated by subdivisions of the state that qualify under 40 CFR 258.74(f) may include any mechanism allowed to them upon adoption and publication.
  8. Financial assurance funds for MSWLF units not located on federal or state lands shall be deposited in a county trust fund in the county in which the MSWLF unit is located. The county shall act as the trustee for the trust funds, and as named coprincipal for surety bonds, letters of credit, and insurance. As trustee, the county may require an independent audit of the adequacy of the financial assurance but shall not become liable for financial assurance except in the case of default as otherwise defined by federal and state law.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7417, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 18, p. 342; am. 1994, ch. 75, § 10, p. 156.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The effective date of the requirements of this section, pursuant to the 1996 amendment of 40 C.F.R. § 258.70, referred to in subsection (2), are April 9, 1997, and October 9, 1997, for MSWLF units meeting the conditions of 40 C.F.R. § 258.1(f)(1).

Effective Dates.

Section 11 of S.L. 1994, ch. 75 declared an emergency. Approved March 9, 1994.

§ 39-7418. Modifications to sites approved under this chapter.

  1. The following classes of modifications to approved sites shall require that an owner or operator amend the approved design or ground water monitoring program:
    1. Lateral expansion outside the approved waste management unit boundary design;
    2. Unpredictable change affecting any environmental monitoring program;
    3. Change of liner design; or
    4. A modification of the design or operation due to initiation of corrective action and remediation.
  2. The scope of new investigations and plan amendment shall be defined by the owner, director and health district before any modification to the decision is begun. Only those stages of the applicable approval process affected by the request for modification shall be required.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7418, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 19, p. 342.

§ 39-7419. Inspections.

  1. All MSWLF units shall be subject to routine inspection by the county, director and health district in accordance with relevant provisions of the Idaho Code.
  2. At intervals of not less than three (3) years, nor more than five (5) years, the owner, county, director and health district shall jointly conduct a comprehensive review of the MSWLF unit for provisions contained in this chapter, technical guidance, other provisions, and the plan for design and operation, as amended. A record of the review shall be placed in the operating record of the MSWLF unit which shall be maintained by the owner and the health district with jurisdiction. Operating procedures shall be recertified at intervals of no more than three (3) years.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7419, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 20, p. 342.

§ 39-7420. Violations and enforcement.

  1. Failure to comply with the requirements established in this chapter, requirements of rules established pursuant to this chapter, and reasonable conditions of approval granted pursuant to this chapter shall be unlawful. Particularly with respect to siting and operation of a municipal solid waste landfill to satisfy the requirements of chapter 44, title 31, Idaho Code, enforcement should focus upon remediation of deficiencies, rather than punishment. Penalties should be imposed where practices show disregard for protection of human health, safety and the environment.
  2. Each public agency with responsibility for enforcement of requirements established in this chapter may inspect, monitor and employ such methods of enforcement as they may be empowered to use by statute or local ordinance.
    1. The director may apply the provisions of section 39-108, Idaho Code, to insure compliance.
    2. The respective health districts or the several counties may employ the use of negotiated compliance agreements in addition to civil legal remedies and misdemeanor criminal penalties otherwise authorized in order to obtain compliance with requirements established herein.
  3. Where more than one (1) public entity undertakes enforcement efforts to obtain compliance with the provisions of this chapter, enforcement efforts should be coordinated to the greatest extent possible to minimize conflict among requirements and costs of compliance.
  4. A private right of action in behalf of any person who has been injured or damaged by any approval authorized in this chapter or violation of the terms of any approval or regulation authorized in this chapter may be maintained in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and/or the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, as applicable.
  5. If a district fails to carry out responsibilities established in this chapter, the director may assume the authority otherwise to be implemented by a district.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7420, as added by 1992, ch. 331, § 1, p. 972; am. 1993, ch. 139, § 21, p. 342.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 24 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139 read: “If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this act is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

Effective Dates.

Section 4 of S.L. 1992, ch. 331 declared an emergency. This section became law without the governor’s signature on April 15, 1992. Section 25 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139 declared an emergency. Approved March 25, 1993.

CASE NOTES

Review.

Site selection by the county commissioners is a significant step in the process of selecting a building and operating a landfill and falls within the “approval authorized” contemplated by subsection (4) of this section, and, therefore, landowners are permitted to seek judicial review of the site selection under the administrative procedures act. Petersen v. Franklin County, 130 Idaho 176, 938 P.2d 1214 (1997).

§ 39-7421. Research, development and demonstration permits.

  1. The provisions of 42 U.S.C. 6945(c)(1)(B) and 40 CFR 258 allow the administrator of the United States environmental protection agency to approve state research, development and demonstration permit programs.
  2. The director shall initiate the process outlined in 40 CFR 239 by which the state may receive authorization to issue research, development and demonstration (RDD) permits in compliance with 40 CFR 258.4 at such time as:
    1. The department receives a request from any individual who expresses an intent to apply for an RDD permit; and
    2. The department and requesting individual enter into a written agreement in which the requesting individual agrees to reimburse the department for the reasonable and necessary cost to make such application.
  3. Upon receipt of state authorization to issue such permits, the director may issue an RDD permit for a new MSWLF unit, existing MSWLF unit, or lateral expansion for which the owner or operator proposes to utilize innovative and new methods which vary from either or both of the following criteria:
    1. The run-on control systems required by section 39-7412(7)(a), Idaho Code; and
    2. The liquid restrictions in section 39-7412(8), Idaho Code.
  4. Any permit issued under subsection (3) of this section shall include the following terms and conditions:
    1. The MSWLF unit shall have a leachate collection system designed and constructed to maintain less than a thirty (30) centimeter depth of leachate on the liner;
    2. Any liquids to be recirculated, injected or otherwise placed in the MSWLF unit shall be appropriate for the purposes of determining the efficacy and performance capabilities of the technology or process and shall be approved by the director;
    3. The MSWLF unit owner or operator shall install and operate a landfill gas collection and control system in accordance with emission control requirements as specified in 40 CFR part 60, and when collected in economically feasible volumes, landfill gas shall be used for energy generation.
  5. Upon receipt of state authorization to issue such permits, the director may issue an RDD permit for a new MSWLF unit, existing MSWLF unit, or lateral expansion, for which the owner or operator proposes to utilize innovative and new methods which vary from the final cover criteria of 40 CFR 258.60 (a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(1) provided the landfill owner or operator demonstrates that the infiltration of liquid will not cause contamination of ground water or surface water, or cause leachate depth on the liner to exceed thirty (30) centimeters.
  6. Any permit issued under the provisions of this section shall include terms and conditions at least as protective as the criteria for MSWLFs to assure protection of human health and the environment. Such permits shall:
    1. Provide for the construction and operation of such facilities as necessary, for not longer than three (3) years, unless renewed as provided in subsection (8) of this section;
    2. Provide that the MSWLF unit must receive only those types and quantities of municipal solid waste and nonhazardous wastes which the director deems appropriate for the purposes of determining the efficacy and performance capabilities of the technology or process;
    3. Include such requirements as necessary to protect human health and the environment, including such requirements as necessary for testing and providing information to the director with respect to the operation of the facility;
    4. Require the owner or operator of a MSWLF unit permitted under this section to submit an annual report to the director showing whether and to what extent the site is progressing in attaining project goals. The report shall also include a summary of all monitoring and testing results, as well as any other operating information specified by the director in the permit. Annual reports shall be submitted to the director within three (3) months after the anniversary date of the approved permit or permit renewal; and
    5. Require compliance with all criteria in chapter 74, title 39, Idaho Code, except as permitted under this section.
  7. The director may order an immediate termination of all operations at the facility allowed under this section or other corrective measures at any time the director determines that the overall goals of the project are not being attained including, but not limited to, protection of human health or the environment.
  8. Any permit issued under the provisions of this section shall not exceed three (3) years and each renewal of a permit shall not exceed three (3) years.
    1. The total term for a permit for a project, including renewals, shall not exceed twelve (12) years.
    2. During permit renewal, the applicant shall provide a detailed assessment of the project showing the status with respect to achieving project goals, a list of problems and status with respect to problem resolutions, and any other requirements that the director determines necessary for permit renewal.
    3. Owners or operators requesting permit renewal shall submit the permit renewal application to the director at least six (6) months prior to the existing permit expiration date.
  9. It shall be unlawful to begin construction to implement or otherwise utilize the exemptions provided in this section without first receiving a permit from the director. Permit applications will be processed in the following manner:
    1. The director shall review the RDD permit application and each subsequent permit renewal in the same manner as the director reviews requests for design approval pursuant to section 39-7411, Idaho Code. An applicant shall provide information in the permit application in sufficient detail to address design, operating, closure, postclosure and financial assurance requirements.
    2. Each permit application and permit renewal application shall require the owner or operator to certify to the director that the information contained in the application is, to the best of his or her knowledge, accurate and true, and the MSWLF unit is in compliance with applicable law.
  10. Permit review and oversight costs incurred by the department of environmental quality, or “department,” and health district shall be reimbursed by the applicant or permittee. Reimbursable review and oversight costs shall include, but are not limited to:
    1. Reasonable costs associated with the director’s review of a permit application submitted pursuant to this section, including department staff time and the cost of goods and services contracted by the department in performance of the activities described in this section;
    2. Reasonable costs associated with the health district’s review of portions of a permit application submitted pursuant to this section when such review is delegated to the health district by statute, rule, or agreement with the director;
    3. Reasonable costs associated with the department’s and health district’s oversight of permitted RDD units, including inspections and the review of annual reports, monitoring, and testing results required pursuant to this section or required by permit, and the processing of permit amendments and terminations; and
    4. All other reasonable and necessary costs of actions taken by the department pursuant to this section.
  11. Reimbursable review and oversight costs incurred by the department and health district, as defined in subsection (10) of this section, shall be reimbursed as follows:
    1. Each permit application submitted to the director pursuant to this section shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and an estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs the department and health district may incur associated with the review of the permit application and oversight of the permit. Each permit renewal application submitted to the director pursuant to this section shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee of one hundred dollars ($100) and an estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs the department and health district may incur associated with the review and oversight of the permit renewal.
    2. If the department, in consultation with the health district, determines that the applicant’s estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs is accurate, and the submission of such funds will adequately reimburse the department and the health district for the cost of all review and oversight activities associated with that permit application or renewal application, the department shall notify the applicant, and the applicant shall submit to the department the full amount, or an installment deposit in the amount required pursuant to this subsection.
    3. If the department, in consultation with the health district, determines that the applicant’s estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs is not accurate, and the submission of such funds will not adequately reimburse the department and the health district for the cost of all review and oversight activities associated with that permit application or renewal application, the department shall notify the applicant and the application shall be returned to the applicant.
    4. Upon receipt of funds in the amount estimated by the applicant and concurred to by the department and health district, or receipt of an installment deposit in the amount required under this subsection, the director shall initiate permit application review or permit renewal review.
    5. Once the department and the health district concur with an applicant’s estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs, and the department provides the applicant notice thereof, a permit applicant or permit renewal applicant may submit to the department the reimbursement funds in their entirety or an installment deposit of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500). Should funding be required for costs incurred in excess of the initial two thousand five hundred dollar ($2,500) deposit, the department shall notify the applicant of required successive deposits in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500). The department shall pass along funds collected on behalf of the health district for reimbursable review and oversight costs incurred by such district within sixty (60) days of receipt of such funds from the applicant, or within sixty (60) days of receipt of a certified request for such funds from the health district, whichever is later. Any unused portion of the reimbursement funds, deposit, or successive deposit shall be returned to the applicant within sixty (60) days of the director’s final decision to issue or deny a permit or permit renewal pursuant to this section. If the applicant fails to submit a successive deposit, the department shall suspend review of the permit application or renewal application, and the director shall be relieved of any applicable statutory or regulatory permit application or renewal application review deadlines during the review suspension.
    6. The director shall, as a condition of renewal, require renewal applicants to reimburse the department for previously uncaptured reimbursable permit review and oversight costs incurred by the department or health district during the prior permit term.
    7. Upon request, the department shall provide documentation to the applicant to aid in the development of the applicant’s estimation of reimbursable review and oversight costs or to support the department’s claims and any health district claims for such reimbursement.
    8. Funds submitted to the department pursuant to this section shall not be returned if a permit application is terminated, withdrawn, returned, or denied unless the funds, or some portion thereof, have not been used by the department or health district as of the date of the termination, withdrawal, return, or denial.
  12. A permit issued pursuant to this section may be transferred only to a new owner or operator of the permitted MSWLF. The new owner or operator shall submit to the director in writing, a request for permit transfer. The request shall include a statement that the new owner or operator will comply with all terms and conditions of the permit. Upon transfer of the permit, the new owner or operator shall be responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit, and shall be subject to enforcement of such terms and conditions.
  13. The following MSWLF units are not eligible for a permit issued pursuant to this section:
    1. MSWLF units operating under an exemption set forth in section 39-7409(2)(c), Idaho Code.
    2. MSWLF units operating under an exemption set forth in 40 CFR 258.1(f).
    3. MSWLF units that dispose of twenty (20) tons of solid waste per day or less, based on an annual average, are not eligible for a variance from 40 CFR 258.60(b)(1), except in accordance with 40 CFR 258.60(b)(3).
    4. MSWLF units that have exceeded ground water protection standards at statistically significant levels as specified in section 39-7410(4)(a), Idaho Code, from any waste unit on site and have not implemented a remedy in accordance with section 39-7414, Idaho Code, prior to RDD permit application submittal.
    5. MSWLF units that have landfill gas concentration exceedances, as specified in section 39-7412(4), Idaho Code, from any waste unit on site and have not implemented a remedy in accordance with section 39-7412(4), Idaho Code, prior to RDD permit application submittal.
  14. Owners or operators of MSWLF units circulating leachate or gas condensate derived from the MSWLF unit in compliance with section 39-7412(8), Idaho Code, and 40 CFR 258.28, and not implementing or otherwise utilizing an exemption under this section, are not required to comply with the requirements of this section.
  15. An applicant or permittee may appeal any final decision made by the director under this section by filing a request for hearing in accordance with rules promulgated by the department governing contested cases, or in the absence of such rules, in accordance with the procedures in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7421, as added by 2010, ch. 146, § 1, p. 309.

STATUTORY NOTES
Compiler’s Notes.

Former§ 39-7421 was amended and redesignated as§ 39-7402A by § 3 of S.L. 1993, ch. 139.

The letters “RDD” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Chapter 75 ADOPTION AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Sec.

§ 39-7501. Interstate compact on adoption and medical assistance.

The interstate compact on adoption and medical assistance is hereby enacted into law and entered into by the state of Idaho as a party, and is in full force and effect between the state and other states joining the agreement in accordance with its terms.

INTERSTATE COMPACT ON ADOPTION AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

ARTICLE I. FINDINGS

The states which are parties to this Compact find that:

  1. In order to obtain adoptive families for children with special needs, states must assure prospective adoptive parents of substantial assistance (usually on a continuing basis) in meeting the high costs of supporting and providing for the special needs and the services required by such children.
  2. The states have a fundamental interest in promoting adoption for children with special needs because the care, emotional stability, and general support and encouragement required by such children can be best, and often only, obtained in family homes with a normal parent-child relationship.
  3. The states obtain fiscal advantages from providing adoption assistance because the alternative is for the states to bear the higher cost of meeting all the needs of children while in foster care.
  4. The necessary assurances of adoption assistance for children with special needs, in those instances where children and adoptive parents live in states other than the one undertaking to provide the assistance, include the establishment and maintenance of suitable substantive guarantees and workable procedures for interstate cooperation and payments to assist with the necessary costs of child maintenance, the procurement of services, and the provision of medical assistance.

ARTICLE II. PURPOSES

The purposes of this Compact are to:

  1. Strengthen protections for the interests of children with special needs on behalf of whom adoption assistance is committed to be paid, when such children are in or move to states other than the one committed to provide adoption assistance.
  2. Provide substantive assurances and operating procedures which will promote the delivery of medical and other services to children on an interstate basis through programs of adoption assistance established by the laws of the states which are parties to this Compact.

ARTICLE III. DEFINITIONS

As used in this Compact, unless the context clearly requires a different construction:

  1. “Child with special needs” means a minor who has not yet attained the age at which the state normally discontinues children’s services, or a child who has not yet reached the age of 21 where the state determines that the child’s mental or physical handicaps warrant the continuation of assistance beyond the age of majority, for whom the state has determined the following:
    1. That the child cannot or should not be returned to the home of his or her parents; 2. That there exists with respect to the child a specific factor or condition (such as his ethnic background, age, or membership in a minority or sibling group, or the presence of factors such as medical condition or physical, mental, or emotional handicaps) because of which it is reasonable to conclude that such child cannot be placed with adoptive parents without providing adoption assistance;
  2. “Adoption assistance” means the payment or payments for the maintenance of a child which are made or committed to be made pursuant to the adoption assistance program established by the laws of a party state.
  3. “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or a Territory or Possession of the United States.
  4. “Adoption assistance state” means the state that is signatory to an adoption assistance agreement in a particular case.
  5. “Residence state” means the state in which the child is a resident by virtue of the residence of the adoptive parents.
  6. “Parents” mean either the singular or plural of the word “parent”.

3. That, except where it would be against the best interests of the child because of such factors as the existence of significant emotional ties with prospective adoptive parents while in their care as a foster child, a reasonable but unsuccessful effort has been made to place the child with appropriate adoptive parents without providing adoption assistance.

ARTICLE IV. ADOPTION ASSISTANCE

  1. Each state shall determine the amounts of adoption assistance and other aid which it will give to children with special needs and their adoptive parents in accordance with its own laws and programs. The adoption assistance and other aid may be made subject to periodic reevaluation of eligibility by the adoption assistance state in accordance with its laws.
  2. The adoption assistance, medical assistance, and other services and benefits to which this Compact applies are those provided to children with special needs and their adoptive parents from the effective date of the adoption assistance agreement.
  3. Every case of adoption assistance shall include a written adoption assistance agreement between the adoptive parents and the appropriate agency of the state undertaking to provide the adoption assistance. Every such agreement shall contain provisions for the fixing of actual or potential interstate aspects of the assistance so provided as follows:
    1. An express commitment that the assistance so provided shall be payable without regard for the state of residence of the adoptive parents, both at the outset of the agreement period and at all times during its continuance;
    2. A provision setting forth with particularity the types of care and services toward which the adoption assistance state will make payments;
    3. A commitment to make medical assistance available to the child in accordance with Article V of this Compact;
    4. An express declaration that the agreement is for the benefit of the child, the adoptive parents and the state and that is enforceable by any or all of them; and
    5. The date or dates upon which each payment or other benefit provided thereunder is to commence, but in no event prior to the effective date of the adoption assistance agreement.
  4. Any services or benefits provided for a child by the residence state and the adoption assistance state may be facilitated by the party states on each other’s behalf. To this end, the personnel of the child welfare agencies of the party states will assist each other, as well as the beneficiaries of adoption assistance agreements, in assuring prompt and full access to all benefits expressly included in such agreements. It is further recognized and agreed that, in general, all children to whom adoption assistance agreements apply will be eligible for benefits under the child welfare, education, rehabilitation, mental health, and other programs of their state of residence on the same basis as other resident children. (e) Adoption assistance payments on behalf of a child in another state shall be made on the same basis and in the same amounts as they would be made if the child were living in the state making the payments, except that the laws of the adoption assistance state may provide for the payment of higher amounts.

ARTICLE V. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

  1. Children for whom a party state is committed, in accordance with the terms of an adoption assistance agreement to provide federally aided medical assistance under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, are eligible for such medical assistance during the entire period for which the agreement is in effect. Upon application therefor, the adoptive parents of a child who is the subject of such an adoption assistance agreement shall receive a medical assistance identification document made out in the child’s name. The identification shall be issued by the medical assistance program of the residence state and shall entitle the child to the same benefits, pursuant to the same procedures, as any other child who is covered by the medical assistance program in that state, whether or not the adoptive parents are themselves eligible for medical assistance.
  2. The identification document shall bear no indication that an adoption assistance agreement with another state is the basis for its issuance. However, if the identification is issued pursuant to such an adoption assistance agreement, the records of the issuing state and the adoption assistance state shall show the fact, and shall contain a copy of the adoption assistance agreement and any amendment or replacement thereof, as well as all other pertinent information. The adoption assistance and medical assistance programs of the adoption assistance state shall be notified of the issuance of such identification.
  3. A state which has issued a medical assistance identification document pursuant to this Compact, which identification is valid and currently in force, shall accept, process and pay medical assistance claims thereon as it would with any other medical assistance claims by eligible residents.
  4. The federally aided medical assistance provided by a party state pursuant to this Compact shall be in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Article. In addition, when a child who is covered by an adoption assistance agreement is living in another party state, payment or reimbursement for any medical services and benefits specified under the terms of the adoption assistance agreement, which are not available to the child under the Title XIX medical assistance program of the residence state, shall be made by the adoption assistance state as required by its law. Any payments so provided shall be of the same kind and at the same rates as provided for children who are living in the adoption assistance state. However, where the payment rate authorized for a covered service under the medical assistance program of the adoption assistance state exceeds the rate authorized by the residence state for that service, the adoption assistance state shall not be required to pay the additional amounts for the services or benefits covered by the residence state.
  5. A child referred to in paragraph (a) of this Article, whose residence is changed from one party state to another party state shall be eligible for federally aided medical assistance under the medical assistance program of the new state of residence. ARTICLE VI. COMPACT ADMINISTRATION
    1. Documentation of continuing adoption assistance eligibility;
    2. Interstate payments and reimbursements; and
    3. Any and all other matters arising pursuant to this Compact.

(a) In accordance with its own laws and procedures, each state which is a party to this Compact shall designate a Compact Administrator and such Deputy Compact Administrator as it deems necessary. The Compact Administrator shall coordinate all activities under this Compact within his or her state. The Compact Administrator shall also be the principal contact for officials and agencies within and without the state for the facilitation of interstate relations involving this Compact and the protection of benefits and services provided pursuant thereto. In this capacity, the Compact Administrator will be responsible for assisting child welfare agency personnel from other party states and adoptive families receiving adoption and medical assistance on an interstate basis.

(b) Acting jointly, the Compact Administrators shall develop uniform forms and administrative procedures for the interstate monitoring and delivery of adoption and medical assistance benefits and services pursuant to this Compact. The forms and procedures so developed may deal with such matters as:

(c)(1) Some or all of the parties to this Compact may enter into supplementary agreements for the provision of or payment for additional medical benefits and services, as provided in Article V(d); for interstate service delivery, pursuant to Article IV(d); or for matters related thereto. Such agreements shall not be inconsistent with this Compact, nor shall they relieve the party states of any obligation to provide adoption and medical assistance in accordance with applicable state and federal law and the terms of this compact.

(2) Administrative procedures or forms implementing the supplementary agreements referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this Article may be developed by joint action of the Compact Administrators of those states which are party to such supplementary agreements.

(d) It shall be the responsibility of the Compact Administrator to ascertain whether and to what extent additional legislation may be necessary in his or her own state to carry out the provisions of this Article IV or any supplementary agreements pursuant to this Compact.

ARTICLE VII. JOINDER AND WITHDRAWAL

  1. This Compact shall be open to joinder by any state. It shall enter into force as to a state when its duly constituted and empowered authority has executed it.
  2. In order that the provisions of this Compact may be accessible to and known by the general public, and so that they may be implemented as law in each of the party states, the authority which has executed the Compact in each party state shall cause the full text of the Compact and a notice of its execution to be published in his or her state. The executing authority in any party state shall also provide copies of the Compact upon request.
  3. Withdrawal from this Compact shall be by written notice, sent by the authority which executed it, to the appropriate officials of all other party states, but no such notice shall take effect until one year after it is given in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph.
  4. All adoption assistance agreements outstanding and to which a party state is a signatory at the time when its withdrawal from this compact takes effect shall continue to have the effects given to them pursuant to this Compact until they expire or are terminated in accordance with their provisions. Until such expiration or termination, all beneficiaries of the agreements involved shall continue to have all rights and obligations conferred or imposed by this Compact, and the withdrawing state shall continue to administer the Compact to the extent necessary to accord and implement fully the rights and protections preserved hereby. ARTICLE VIII. CONSTRUCTION AND SEVERABILITY

The provisions of this Compact shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes thereof. The provisions of this Compact shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, or provision of this Compact is declared to be contrary to the Constitution of the United States or of any party state, or where the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person, or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Compact and the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this Compact shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state party thereto, the Compact shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all severable matters.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7501, as added by 1994, ch. 69, § 1, p. 141.

STATUTORY NOTES

Federal References.

Title XIX of the Social Security Act, referred to in subsection (a) of Article V, is compiled as 42 USCS §§ 1396 to 1396v.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the interstate compact on adoption and medical assistance, see http://aaicama.org .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-7502. Compact administrator.

Pursuant to said compact, the governor is hereby authorized and empowered to designate an officer who shall be the compact administrator and who, acting jointly with like officers of other party states, shall develop guidelines and procedures to carry out more effectively the terms of the compact. Said compact administrator shall serve subject to the pleasure of the governor. The compact administrator is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to cooperate with all departments, agencies and officers of and in the government of this state and its subdivisions in facilitating the proper administration of the compact or of any supplementary agreement or agreements entered into by this state thereunder.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7502, as added by 1994, ch. 69, § 1, p. 141.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

For association of administrators for the interstate compact on adoption and medical assistance, see http://aaicama.org .

§ 39-7503. Supplementary agreements and financial arrangements.

The compact administrator is hereby authorized and empowered to enter into supplementary agreements with appropriate officials of other states pursuant to the compact. In the event that such supplementary agreement shall require or contemplate the use of any institution or facility of this state or require or contemplate the provision of any service of this state, said supplementary agreement shall have no force or effect until approved by the head of the department or agency under whose jurisdiction said institution or facility is operated or whose department or agency will be charged with the rendering of such service. The compact administrator, subject to the approval of the board of examiners, may make or arrange for any payments necessary to discharge any financial obligations imposed upon this state by the compact or by any supplementary agreement entered into thereunder.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7503, as added by 1994, ch. 69, § 1, p. 141.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

For association of administrators for the interstate compact on adoption and medical assistance, see http://aaicama.org .

§ 39-7504. Financial responsibility of parents of estate.

The compact administrator shall take appropriate action pursuant to existing law to effect the recovery from relevant parents of estate, at the option of said administrator, of any and all costs expended by the state, or any of its subdivisions, with respect to Idaho children handled under said compact.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7504, as added by 1994, ch. 69, § 1, p. 141; am. 2012, ch. 257, § 11, p. 709.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 257, deleted “and guardians” and “or guardians” following “parents” in the section heading and in the text.

§ 39-7505. Responsibilities of enforcement.

The courts, departments, agencies and officers of this state and its subdivisions shall enforce this compact and shall do all things appropriate to the effectuation of its purposes and intent which may be within their respective jurisdiction.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7505, as added by 1994, ch. 69, § 1, p. 141.

Chapter 76 PUBLIC DRINKING WATER SYSTEM LOANS

Sec.

§ 39-7601. Authorization of loans.

The director is hereby authorized to make loans at or below market interest rates, as funds are available, to any eligible public water system to assist the public water system or which will facilitate their compliance with national primary drinking water regulations applicable to the system or to otherwise significantly further the health protection objectives of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7601, as added by 1997, ch. 26, § 2, p. 36.

§ 39-7602. Disbursements by the director of loans to public water systems — Limitations on loans — Rules — Approval of the attorney general — Audit of disbursements.

  1. There is hereby created the drinking water loan fund. The department of environmental quality shall use moneys from this fund only for providing loans, or as a source of reserve and security for leveraged loans, the proceeds of which are deposited in the drinking water loan fund, or for other financial assistance authorized in this chapter or by federal law to community water systems and nonprofit noncommunity water systems. Financial assistance under this section may be used by a public water system only for project expenditures, not including monitoring, operation and maintenance expenditures, which will facilitate compliance with national primary drinking water standards applicable to the system or which will significantly further the health protection objectives of this chapter. The funds may also be used for public water systems using constructed conveyances and not piped water systems if they meet the requirements of the safe drinking water act amendments of 1996 and the director determines that the water provided for residential or similar uses for cooking, drinking and bathing is centrally treated or treated at the point of entry to achieve the equivalent level of protection provided by the applicable national primary drinking water regulations. The funds shall not be used for the acquisition of real property or an interest in real property unless the acquisition is integral to the project authorized by this section and the purchase is from a willing seller.
    1. Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, no loan assistance shall be provided to a public water system that: (2)(a) Except as provided in subsection (2)(b) of this section, no loan assistance shall be provided to a public water system that:
      1. Does not have the technical, managerial and financial capability to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter; or
      2. Is in significant noncompliance with any requirement of a national primary drinking water regulation or variance.
    2. A public water system referenced in subsection (2)(a) of this section may receive assistance under this section if:
      1. The assistance will ensure compliance, and
      2. If subsection (2)(a)(i) of this section applies to the system, the owner or operator of the system agrees to undertake feasible and appropriate changes in operations, including ownership, management, accounting, rates, maintenance, consolidation, alternative water supply or other procedures, and then only if the director determines that the measures are necessary to ensure that the system has the technical, managerial and financial capability to comply with the requirements of this chapter and the safe drinking water act amendments of 1996.
      3. Principal and interest payments on each loan will commence not later than one (1) year after completion of the project for which the loan was made and each loan will be fully amortized not later than twenty (20) years after completion of the project, except that in the case of a disadvantaged community, an extended form for a loan may be allowed if it terminates not later than thirty (30) years after the date the project is completed, and does not exceed the design life of the project,
      4. The recipient of each loan will establish a dedicated source of revenue, or, in the case of a privately owned system, demonstrate that there is adequate security, for the repayment of the loan, and
      5. The drinking water loan fund will be credited with all payment of principal and interest on each loan;
  2. Except as otherwise prohibited by state law, the amounts deposited into the drinking water loan fund under this chapter may be used only for the following:
    1. To make loans on the conditions that: (i) The interest rate for each loan is less than or equal to the market interest rate,
    2. To buy or refinance the debt obligation of a municipality or an intermunicipal or interstate agency within the state at an interest rate that is less than or equal to the market interest rate in any case in which a debt obligation is incurred after July 1, 1993;
    3. As a source of revenue or security for the payment of principal and interest on revenue or general obligation bonds issued by the state if the proceeds of the sale of the bonds will be deposited into the drinking water loan fund; and
    4. To earn interest on the amounts deposited into the drinking water loan fund.
  3. For every agreement between the state and the federal government by which funds are made available, the state shall deposit in the drinking water loan fund an amount equal to at least twenty percent (20%) of the total amount of the grant to be made to the state on or before the dates on which grant payments are made to the state.
  4. The director may promulgate rules necessary for the making and enforcing of loan contracts hereunder and for establishing procedures to be followed in applying for state loans or loan subsidies or training assistance herein authorized as shall be necessary for the effective administration of the loan program.
  5. All contracts entered into pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to approval by the attorney general as to form. All disbursements by the state pursuant to such contracts shall be made after audit and upon warrant as provided by law on vouchers approved by the director.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7602, as added by 1997, ch. 26, § 2, p. 36; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 71, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Department of environmental quality,§ 39-101 et seq.

Federal References.

The safe drinking water act amendments of 1996, referred to in subsections (1) and (2)(b)(ii), are compiled as 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

A.L.R.

Citizen’s Cause of Action Under Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-8. 16 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 4.

§ 39-7603. Investment of funds in drinking water loan account [fund].

Surplus moneys in the drinking water loan account [fund] established by section 39-7602, Idaho Code, shall be invested by the state treasurer in the manner for idle state moneys in the state treasury as provided for in section 67-1210, Idaho Code. Interest received on all such investments shall be paid into the account [fund]. The account [fund] shall have paid into it: federal funds which are received by the state to provide for drinking water loans to public water systems together with the required state matching funds; all principal and interest repayments of loans made pursuant to this chapter; all donations and grants from any source which may be used for the provisions of this chapter; fund transfers from the wastewater facility loan account; and any moneys which may hereafter be provided by law.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7603, as added by 1997, ch. 26, § 2, p. 36; am. 2014, ch. 59, § 3, p. 141.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Wastewater facility loan account,§ 39-3629.

Amendments.

The 2014 amendment, by ch. 59, inserted “fund transfers from the wastewater facility loan account” near the end of the section.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertions in the section heading and text were added by the compiler to reflect the 2001 name change of the fund. See§ 39-7602.

§ 39-7604. Appropriations for the drinking water loan account [fund] — Purpose of chapter.

Moneys in the drinking water loan account [fund] are hereby perpetually appropriated to provide loans and other forms of financial assistance authorized under title XVI of the public health service act known as the safe drinking water act and the safe drinking water act amendments of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., to any eligible public water system in order to enable the system to comply with the above referenced act and relevant regulations.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7604, as added by 1997, ch. 26, § 2, p. 36.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertions in the section heading and text were added by the compiler to reflect the 2001 name change of the fund.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

A.L.R.

Citizen’s Cause of Action Under Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-8. 16 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 4.

§ 39-7605. Limits on the amounts and loans.

The director may make loans to eligible public water systems pursuant to the requirements of this chapter and federal laws and regulations provided, that the projected disbursements for such loans would not cause the projected balance in the loan fund to fall below zero at any time. All loan disbursements shall be subject to the availability of moneys in the account [fund].

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7605, as added by 1997, ch. 26, § 2, p. 36.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion at the end of the section was added by the compiler to reflect the 2001 name change to the drinking water loan fund.

§ 39-7606. Public water system supervision fund.

  1. There is hereby created in the state treasury the public water system supervision fund. Moneys in the fund shall consist of fees assessed pursuant to rules of the department on regulated public drinking water systems, federal funds which are received by the state to provide for the public water system supervision program, donations, state appropriations and any other moneys from whatever source.
  2. Idle or surplus moneys in the public water system supervision fund established by this section shall be invested by the state treasurer in the manner for idle state moneys in the state treasury as provided for in section 67-1210, Idaho Code. Interest received on all such investments shall be paid into the fund. Moneys in the fund may be expended pursuant to appropriation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7606, as added by 2000, ch. 165, § 1, p. 416.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 165 declared an emergency. Approved April 3, 2000.

Chapter 77 VOLUNTEER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER IMMUNITY

Sec.

§ 39-7701. Legislative findings.

The legislature of the state of Idaho finds that access to high quality health care services is a concern of all persons. However, access to such services is severely limited for some residents of the state, particularly those who reside in remote, rural areas or in the urban areas. Physicians and other health care professionals have traditionally worked to assure broad access to health care services and many are willing to volunteer their services to address the health care needs of Idahoans who may otherwise not be able to obtain such services. The public policy of this state is to encourage and facilitate voluntary provision of health care services.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7701, as added by 1998, ch. 295, § 1, p. 976.

§ 39-7702. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Community health screening event” means an event sponsored by a school, a church, a civic club or another community organization for the purpose of providing health screenings by health care providers who are not compensated for their volunteer service at the event.
  2. “Compensation” means any remuneration, whether by way of salary, fee or otherwise, for health care services rendered. Compensation does not include actual and necessary expenses that are incurred by a volunteer health care provider in connection with the services provided or the duties performed by the health care provider on behalf of a free clinic, and that are reimbursed to the volunteer health care provider.
  3. “Free medical clinic” means a facility other than a hospital or health care provider’s office which is an organized community-based program, registered with the department of health and welfare, at which primary medical care is provided without charge to individuals unable to pay for it, and at which the care provided does not include the use of general anesthesia or require an overnight stay in a health care facility.
  4. “Health care provider” means any physician, dentist, optometrist, physician assistant, nurse, or other person who is licensed, certified, or registered under title 54, Idaho Code, to provide health care or other professional services or who is otherwise authorized to practice in Idaho. “Health care provider” also includes an individual enrolled in an accredited education or training program for licensure, certification, or registration under title 54, Idaho Code, while the individual is providing services under the direct supervision of a person who is licensed, certified, or registered under title 54, Idaho Code, and practicing within his regulated scope of practice, as long as the patient has been notified that the individual is a student.
  5. “Health screening” means an examination, an evaluation or another health care assessment of a person by a licensed health care provider practicing within the provider’s scope of practice to determine the fitness of an individual to participate in an event or activity or to determine whether an individual needs additional health care evaluation or treatment.
  6. “Voluntary provision of health care services” means providing professional services by a health care provider without compensation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7702, as added by 1998, ch. 295, § 1, p. 976; am. 2018, ch. 38, § 1, p. 97; am. 2020, ch. 57, § 1, p. 138.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 38, added present subsections (1) and (5) and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 57, rewrote subsection (4), which formerly read: “Health care provider’ means any physician, dentist, optometrist, physician assistant or nurse who is licensed, certified, registered or otherwise authorized to practice in Idaho.”

§ 39-7703. Immunity from liability for health care providers providing charitable medical care.

  1. Any health care provider who voluntarily provides needed medical or health care services to any person at a free medical clinic or who provides health screenings at a community health screening event without compensation or the expectation of compensation shall be immune from liability for any civil action arising out of the provision of such medical or health services. This section shall not extend immunity to the health care provider for any acts constituting intentional, willful or grossly negligent conduct or to acts by a health care provider that are outside the scope of practice authorized by the provider’s licensure, certification or registration.
  2. Immunity pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall apply only if the health care provider and the patient execute a written waiver in advance of the rendering of such medical services specifying that such services are provided without the expectation of compensation and that the health care provider shall be immune as specified herein.
  3. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a free medical clinic from accepting voluntary contributions for health care services provided to a patient who has acknowledged his or her ability and willingness to pay a portion of the value of the health care services provided. Any voluntary contribution collected for providing care at a free medical clinic shall be used only to pay overhead expenses of operating the clinic. No portion of any moneys collected shall be used to provide compensation to any health care provider.
  4. If a health care provider is insured for liability for negligent acts or omissions arising from providing health care services at a free clinic, the immunity provided in subsection (1) of this section is waived, provided however, the amount recovered shall not exceed the limits of such applicable insurance coverage.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7703, as added by 1998, ch. 295, § 1, p. 976; am. 2018, ch. 38, § 2, p. 97.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 38, in subsection (1), substituted “clinic or who provides health screenings at a community health screening event without compensation or the expectation of compensation” for “clinic without compensation or the expectation of compensation due to the inability of such person to pay for the services” near the middle of the first sentence.

§ 39-7704. Registration of free medical clinics — Requirements.

  1. Before providing volunteer health care services in this state, a free medical clinic shall register with the department of health and welfare by submitting a registration fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) and filing a registration form that shall contain:
    1. The name of the free clinic and sponsoring organization, if any;
    2. The name of the principal individual or individuals who are the officers or organizational officials responsible for the operation of the free clinic or sponsoring organization, if any;
    3. The address, including street, city, zip code and county, of the free clinic;
    4. Telephone number;
    5. Such additional information as the department may require.
  2. Each free clinic shall maintain a list of health care providers associated with its provision of voluntary health care services. For each such health care provider, the free clinic shall maintain a copy of a current license, certificate or registration and shall further require each health care provider to attest in writing that such provider’s license, certificate or registration is not suspended or revoked pursuant to disciplinary proceedings in any jurisdiction.
  3. The free clinic shall maintain such records for a period of at least five (5) years following the provision of health care services and shall furnish such records upon request to the department.
  4. Compliance with subsections (1) and (2) of this section shall be prima facie evidence that the free clinic has exercised due care in its selection of health care providers and shall be immune from suit for negligent acts or omissions as provided in subsection (1) of section 39-7703, Idaho Code.
  5. The department may revoke the registration of any free clinic who fails to comply with the requirements of subsections (1) through (4) of this section. Any such revocation shall be conducted in accordance with the administrative procedure act.
  6. The provisions of this section shall not apply to community health screening events.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7704, as added by 1998, ch. 295, § 1, p. 976; am. 2018, ch. 38, § 3, p. 97.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Administrative procedure act,§ 67-5201 et seq.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 38, added subsection (6).

§ 39-7705. Costs and fees.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a party names as a defendant a health care provider who has immunity pursuant to section 39-7703, Idaho Code, in a suit alleging willful or intentional misconduct or gross negligence arising out of treatment at a free clinic which qualifies for immunity pursuant to section 39-7703, Idaho Code, and the trial judge dismisses the complaint or grants a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, or directs a verdict for a defendant, or grants a defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or at any point in the proceedings grants a plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action against the defendant, the defendant shall be entitled to full costs and reasonable attorney’s fees expended in connection with the defendant’s defense of the action. If good reason is shown, the trial judge may suspend the operation of this section.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7705, as added by 1998, ch. 295, § 1, p. 976.

Chapter 78 TOBACCO MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Sec.

§ 39-7801. Findings and purpose.

  1. Cigarette smoking presents serious public health concerns to the state of Idaho (“state”) and to the citizens of the state. The surgeon general has determined that smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease and other serious diseases, and that there are hundreds of thousands of tobacco-related deaths in the United States each year. These diseases most often do not appear until many years after the person in question begins smoking.
  2. Cigarette smoking also presents serious financial concerns for the state. Under certain health-care programs, the state may have a legal obligation to provide medical assistance to eligible persons for health conditions associated with cigarette smoking, and those persons may have a legal entitlement to receive such medical assistance.
  3. Under these programs, the state pays millions of dollars each year to provide medical assistance for these persons for health conditions associated with cigarette smoking.
  4. It is the policy of the state that financial burdens imposed on the state by cigarette smoking be borne by tobacco product manufacturers rather than by the state to the extent that such manufacturers either determine to enter into a settlement with the state or are found culpable by the courts.
  5. On November 23, 1998, leading United States tobacco product manufacturers entered into a settlement agreement, entitled the “Master Settlement Agreement,” with the state. The Master Settlement Agreement obligates these manufacturers, in return for a release of past, present and certain future claims against them as described therein, to pay substantial sums to the state (tied in part to their volume of sales); to fund a national foundation devoted to the interests of public health; and to make substantial changes in their advertising and marketing practices and corporate culture, with the intention of reducing underage smoking.
  6. It would be contrary to the policy of the state if tobacco product manufacturers who determine not to enter into such a settlement could use a resulting cost advantage to derive large, short-term profits in the years before liability may arise without ensuring that the state will have an eventual source of recovery from them if they are proven to have acted culpably. It is thus in the interest of the state to require that such manufacturers establish a reserve fund to guarantee a source of compensation and to prevent such manufacturers from deriving large, short-term profits and then becoming judgment-proof before liability may arise.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7801, as added by 1999, ch. 7, § 1, p. 7.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

ALR. — Validity, Construction, Application, and Effect of Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) Between Tobacco Companies and Various States, and State Statutes Implementing Agreement; Use and Distribution of MSA Proceeds. 25 A.L.R.6th 435.

§ 39-7802. Definitions.

  1. “Adjusted for inflation” means increased in accordance with the formula for inflation adjustment set forth in Exhibit C to the Master Settlement Agreement.
  2. “Affiliate” means a person who directly or indirectly owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with, another person. Solely for purposes of this definition, the terms “owns,” “is owned” and “ownership” mean ownership of an equity interest, or the equivalent thereof, of ten percent (10%) or more, and the term “person” means an individual, partnership, committee, association, corporation or any other organization or group of persons.
  3. “Allocable share” means allocable share as that term is defined in the Master Settlement Agreement.
  4. “Cigarette” means any product that contains nicotine, is intended to be burned or heated under ordinary conditions of use, and consists of or contains: (1) any roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or in any substance not containing tobacco; or (2) tobacco, in any form, that is functional in the product, which, because of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a cigarette; or (3) any roll of tobacco wrapped in any substance containing tobacco which, because of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a cigarette described in clause (1) of this definition. The term “cigarette” includes “roll-your-own” (i.e., any tobacco which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes). For purposes of this definition of “cigarette,” nine one-hundredths (0.09) ounces of “roll-your-own” tobacco shall constitute one (1) individual “cigarette.”
  5. “Master Settlement Agreement” means the settlement agreement (and related documents) entered into on November 23, 1998, by the state and leading United States tobacco product manufacturers.
  6. “Qualified escrow fund” means an escrow arrangement with a federally or state-chartered financial institution having no affiliation with any tobacco product manufacturer and having assets of at least one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) where such arrangement requires that such financial institution hold the escrowed funds’ principal for the benefit of releasing parties and prohibits the tobacco product manufacturer placing the funds into escrow from using, accessing or directing the use of the funds’ principal except as consistent with section 39-7803, Idaho Code.
  7. “Released claims” means released claims as that term is defined in the Master Settlement Agreement.
  8. “Releasing parties” means releasing parties as that term is defined in the Master Settlement Agreement.
  9. “Tobacco product manufacturer” means an entity that after the date of enactment of this act directly (and not exclusively through any affiliate):
    1. Manufactures cigarettes anywhere that such manufacturer intends to be sold in the United States, including cigarettes intended to be sold in the United States through an importer (except where such importer is an original participating manufacturer (as that term is defined in the Master Settlement Agreement) that will be responsible for the payments under the Master Settlement Agreement with respect to such cigarettes as a result of the provisions of subsections II(mm) of the Master Settlement Agreement and that pays the taxes specified in subsection II(z) of the Master Settlement Agreement, and provided that the manufacturer of such cigarettes does not market or advertise such cigarettes in the United States);
    2. Is the first purchaser anywhere for resale in the United States of cigarettes manufactured anywhere that the manufacturer does not intend to be sold in the United States; or
    3. Becomes a successor of an entity described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection.
  10. “Units sold” means the number of individual cigarettes sold in the state by the applicable tobacco product manufacturer (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries) during the year in question, as measured by excise taxes collected by the state on packs (or “roll-your-own” tobacco containers) bearing the excise tax stamp of the state or on unstamped “roll-your-own” tobacco containers, with each nine one-hundredths (0.09) ounces of “roll-your-own” tobacco equaling one (1) unit sold. The state tax commission shall promulgate such rules as are necessary to ascertain the amount of state excise tax paid on the cigarettes of such tobacco product manufacturer for each year.

The term “tobacco product manufacturer” shall not include an affiliate of a tobacco product manufacturer unless such affiliate itself falls within any of paragraphs (1) through (3) of this subsection.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7802, as added by 1999, ch. 7, § 1, p. 7; am. 2005, ch. 39, § 1, p. 159.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12, and§ 63-101.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the date of enactment of this act” in paragraph (h)(i) refers to the date of enactment of S.L. 1999, ch. 7, which was approved by the governor on February 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999.

For more on Master Settlement Agreement, see http://www.ag.idaho.gov/tobacco/Master Settlement.html .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

§ 39-7803. Requirements. [For contingent repeal, see Compiler’s note following second version of this section.]

Any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries) after the date of enactment of this act shall do one (1) of the following:

  1. Become a participating manufacturer (as that term is defined in section II(jj) of the Master Settlement Agreement) and generally perform its financial obligations under the Master Settlement Agreement; or
    1. Place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts (as such amounts are adjusted for inflation): (b)(1) Place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts (as such amounts are adjusted for inflation):
    2. A tobacco product manufacturer that places funds into escrow pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall receive the interest or other appreciation on such funds as earned. Such funds themselves shall be released from escrow only under the following circumstances:
      1. To pay a judgment or settlement on any released claim brought against such tobacco product manufacturer by the state or any releasing party located or residing in the state. Funds shall be released from escrow under this subparagraph: (i) in the order in which they were placed into escrow; and (ii) only to the extent and at the time necessary to make payments required under such judgment or settlement;
      2. To the extent that a tobacco product manufacturer establishes that the amount it was required to place into escrow on account of units sold in the state in a particular year was greater than the Master Settlement Agreement payments, as determined pursuant to section IX(i) of that Agreement including after final determination of all adjustments, that such manufacturer would have been required to make on account of such units sold had it been a participating manufacturer, the excess shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer; or
      3. To the extent not released from escrow under subparagraphs (A) or (B) of this paragraph, funds shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer twenty-five (25) years after the date on which they were placed into escrow.
    3. Each tobacco product manufacturer that elects to place funds into escrow pursuant to this section shall annually certify to the attorney general that it is in compliance with this section. The attorney general may bring a civil action on behalf of the state against any tobacco product manufacturer that fails to place into escrow the funds required under this section. Any tobacco product manufacturer that fails in any year to place into escrow the funds required under this section shall:
      1. Be required within fifteen (15) days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with this section. The court, upon a finding of a violation of this section, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the general fund of the state in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow; (B) In the case of a knowing violation, be required within fifteen (15) days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with this section. The court, upon a finding of a knowing violation of this subsection, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the general fund of the state in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed three hundred percent (300%) of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow; and
    4. In any action brought under this section, the court shall award the attorney general, if he is the prevailing party, reasonable costs, expenses and attorney’s fees in bringing his action.

1999: $.0094241 per unit sold after the date of enactment of this act;

2000: $.0104712 per unit sold;

For each of 2001 and 2002: $.0136125 per unit sold;

For each of 2003 through 2006: $.0167539 per unit sold;

For each of 2007 and each year thereafter: $.0188482 per unit sold.

(C) In the case of a second knowing violation, be prohibited from selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary) for a period not to exceed two (2) years.

Each failure to make an annual deposit required under this section shall constitute a separate violation.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7803, as added by 1999, ch. 7, § 1, p. 7; am. 2000, ch. 118, § 1, p. 256; am. 2003, ch. 289, § 1, p. 781.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on Master Settlement Agreement, see http://www.ag.idaho.gov/tobacco/Master Settlement.html .

The phrase “the date of enactment of this act” in the introductory paragraph and in paragraph (b)(1) refers to the date of enactment of S.L. 1999, ch. 7, which was approved by the governor on February 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

§ 39-7803. Requirements. [Effective contingent upon governor’s proclamation; see Compiler’s note following this section.]

Any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries) after the date of enactment of this act shall do one (1) of the following:

  1. Become a participating manufacturer (as that term is defined in section II(jj) of the Master Settlement Agreement) and generally perform its financial obligations under the Master Settlement Agreement; or
    1. Place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts (as such amounts are adjusted for inflation): (b)(1) Place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts (as such amounts are adjusted for inflation):
    2. A tobacco product manufacturer that places funds into escrow pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall receive the interest or other appreciation on such funds as earned. Such funds themselves shall be released from escrow only under the following circumstances:
      1. To pay a judgment or settlement on any released claim brought against such tobacco product manufacturer by the state or any releasing party located or residing in the state. Funds shall be released from escrow under this subparagraph: (i) in the order in which they were placed into escrow; and (ii) only to the extent and at the time necessary to make payments required under such judgment or settlement;
      2. To the extent that a tobacco product manufacturer establishes that the amount it was required to place into escrow in a particular year was greater than the state’s allocable share of the total payments that such manufacturer would have been required to make in that year under the Master Settlement Agreement (as determined pursuant to section IX(i)(2) of the Master Settlement Agreement, and before any of the adjustments or offsets described in section IX(i)(3) of that Agreement other than the inflation adjustment) had it been a participating manufacturer, the excess shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer; or
      3. To the extent not released from escrow under subparagraphs (A) or (B) of this paragraph, funds shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer twenty-five (25) years after the date on which they were placed into escrow.
    3. Each tobacco product manufacturer that elects to place funds into escrow pursuant to this section shall annually certify to the attorney general that it is in compliance with this section. The attorney general may bring a civil action on behalf of the state against any tobacco product manufacturer that fails to place into escrow the funds required under this section. Any tobacco product manufacturer that fails in any year to place into escrow the funds required under this section shall:
      1. Be required within fifteen (15) days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with this section. The court, upon a finding of a violation of this section, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the general fund of the state in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow; (B) In the case of a knowing violation, be required within fifteen (15) days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with this section. The court, upon a finding of a knowing violation of this subsection, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the general fund of the state in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed three hundred percent (300%) of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow; and
    4. In any action brought under this section, the court shall award the attorney general, if he is the prevailing party, reasonable costs, expenses and attorney’s fees in bringing his action.

1999: $.0094241 per unit sold after the date of enactment of this act;

2000: $.0104712 per unit sold;

For each of 2001 and 2002: $.0136125 per unit sold;

For each of 2003 through 2006: $.0167539 per unit sold;

For each of 2007 and each year thereafter: $.0188482 per unit sold.

(C) In the case of a second knowing violation, be prohibited from selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary) for a period not to exceed two (2) years.

Each failure to make an annual deposit required under this section shall constitute a separate violation.

History.

I.C.,§ 38-7803, as added by 2003, ch. 289, § 4, p. 781.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on Master Settlement Agreement, see http://www.ag.idaho.gov/tobacco/Master Settlement.html .

The phrase “the date of enactment of this act” in the introductory paragraph and in paragraph (b)(1) refers to the date of enactment of S.L. 1999, ch. 7, which was approved by the governor on February 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999.

Section 2 of S.L. 2003, ch. 289 provides: “Severability. If this act, or any portion of the amendment of subsection (b)(2)(B) of Section 39-7803, Idaho Code, made by this act, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, then Sections 3 and 4 of this act shall be in full force and effect. If such finding occurs, the Governor shall, upon his determination that such event has occurred, make a proclamation declaring said event to have happened and the date of such event and file the same with the Secretary of State.” Section 3 of S.L. 2003, ch. 289 repeals Section 39-7803, as amended through S.L. 2003, ch. 289, § 1, and Section 4 of S.L. 2003, ch. 289 enacts this new version of the same code section.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-7804, 39-7805. Cigarette distributor and stamping agent duties — Additional attorney general authority and service of process. [Repealed.]

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The following sections were repealed by S.L. 2003, ch. 33, § 1, effective July 1, 2003:

§ 39-7804, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-7804, as added by 2002, ch. 284, § 2, p. 827.

§ 39-7805, which comprised I.C.,§ 39-7805, as added by 2002, ch. 284, § 3, p. 827.

Chapter 79 LOCAL OPTION SWINE FACILITIES SITING ACT

Sec.

§ 39-7901. Short title.

This act shall be known as the “Local Option Swine Facilities Siting Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7901, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2000, ch. 268, which is codified as§§ 39-7901 to 39-7916.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7902. Legislative findings and purposes.

  1. The legislature finds that:
    1. The swine industry is experiencing rapid changes such as increased sophistication of production technology, increased demand for capital to maintain or expand operations, consolidation of production and packing facilities and changing consumer demands and markets;
    2. Large swine facilities increase social and environmental impacts in the areas where these facilities are located;
    3. Adverse public health and environmental impacts can result from the improper siting of large swine facilities, therefore the need for establishing safe sites with an adequate supply of natural resources, such as water, and an adequate capacity for the disposal of animal waste is a matter of statewide concern;
    4. Section 39-104A, Idaho Code, vests the department of environmental quality with the responsibility to make rules regulating swine operations; and section 39-105, Idaho Code, vests the department of environmental quality with the responsibility for the general supervision of the promotion and protection of the life, health and environment of the people of the state, including regulation of air quality, water quality and disposal of solid waste.
    1. To facilitate swine facility siting decisions by boards of county commissioners and governing bodies of cities, this chapter establishes a review process within the department of environmental quality for construction or expansion of large swine facilities of a certain size, and to require approval of sites. (2)(a) To facilitate swine facility siting decisions by boards of county commissioners and governing bodies of cities, this chapter establishes a review process within the department of environmental quality for construction or expansion of large swine facilities of a certain size, and to require approval of sites.
    2. The procedures and requirements established in this chapter are necessary to facilitate the proper siting of large swine facilities, to effect timely and responsible completion of statutory duties and to ensure protection of human health, natural resources, private property values and the environment of the state.
    3. The site approval required in this chapter is required in addition to any other license, permit or approval required by law or rule.
  2. It is the intent of the legislature that this chapter will be applied only to swine facilities with a capacity of twenty thousand (20,000) animal units or more and that this chapter will not be applied to any other confined animal feeding operations.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7902, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 72, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7903. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Active unit” means that part of a facility or unit that has received or is receiving wastes and that has not been closed.
  2. “Animal unit” is a unit of measurement equaling two and one-half (2 ½) swine, each weighing over twenty-five (25) kilograms (approximately fifty-five (55) pounds), or ten (10) weaned swine, each weighing under twenty-five (25) kilograms. Total animal units are calculated by adding the number of swine weighing over twenty-five (25) kilograms (approximately fifty-five (55) pounds) multiplied by four-tenths (.4), plus the number of weaned swine weighing under twenty-five (25) kilograms multiplied by one-tenth (.1).
  3. “Animal waste” means animal excrement, feed wastes, process wastewater or any other waste associated with the confinement of swine.
  4. “Animal waste management system” means any structure or system that provides for the collection, treatment, disposal, distribution or storage of animal waste.
  5. “Applicant” means the owner or the operator with the owner’s written consent.
  6. “Aquifer” means a geological formation, group of formations, or a portion of a formation capable of yielding significant quantities of ground water to wells or springs.
  7. “Certified planner” means a person who has completed the nutrient management certification in accordance with the nutrient management standard.
  8. “County” means any county in the state of Idaho.
  9. “Department” means the Idaho department of environmental quality.
  10. “Director” means the director of the Idaho department of environmental quality or his designee.
  11. “Existing facility” means a facility built and in operation one (1) year or more before the original effective date of this chapter.
  12. “Expand” or “expanding facility” means a swine facility of less than twenty thousand (20,000) animal units that increases its one-time animal unit capacity to twenty thousand (20,000) or more animal units.
  13. “Facility” means any place, site or location or part thereof where swine are kept, handled, housed, or otherwise maintained and includes, but is not limited to, all buildings, lots, pens, animal waste management systems, structures, and other appurtenances and improvements on the land.
  14. “Ground water” means water below the land surface in a zone of saturation.
  15. “Holocene fault” means a fault characterized as a fracture or a zone of fractures in any material along which strata on one (1) side have been displaced with respect to that on the other side and holocene being the most recent epoch of the quaternary period, extending from the end of the pleistocene epoch to the present.
  16. “Land application” means the spreading on or incorporation of animal waste into the soil mantle primarily for beneficial purposes.
  17. “Natural resources conservation service” or “NRCS” means the United States department of agriculture, natural resources conservation service.
  18. “Nutrient management plan” means a plan prepared in compliance with the nutrient management standard or other equally protective standard approved by the director for managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the land application of nutrients and soil amendments for plant production and to minimize the potential for environmental degradation, particularly of water quality. (19) “Nutrient management standard” means the standard of the United States department of agriculture, natural resource conservation service code 590 or the Idaho agricultural pollution abatement plan, nutrient management standard component practice.

(20) “One-time animal unit capacity” means the maximum number of animal units that a facility is capable of housing at any given point in time.

(21) “Operate” means to confine, feed, propagate, house or otherwise sustain swine.

(22) “Operator” means the person(s) responsible for the overall operation of a facility or part of a facility.

(23) “Owner” means the person(s) who owns a facility or part of a facility.

(24) “Permit” when used as a noun means a permit issued by the director pursuant to rules of the department.

(25) “Person” means an individual, association, firm, partnership, political subdivision, public or private corporation, state or federal agency, municipality, industry or any other legal entity whatsoever, and includes owners and operators.

(26) “Plan of operation” or “operating plan” means the written plan developed by an owner or operator of a swine facility unit detailing how the facility is to be operated during its active life, during closure, and throughout the postclosure period.

(27) “Process wastewater” means any water used in the facility that comes into contact with any manure, litter, bedding, raw, intermediate, or final material or product used in or resulting from the production of swine and any products directly or indirectly used in the operation of a facility, such as spillage or overflow from animal watering systems; washing, cleaning, or flushing pens, barns, manure pits, or spray cooling of animals; and dust control and any precipitation which comes into contact with animals or animal waste.

(28) “Qualified professional” means a licensed professional geologist or licensed professional engineer, as appropriate, holding current professional registration in compliance with applicable provisions of the Idaho Code.

(29) “Unauthorized discharge” means a release of animal waste to the environment or waters of the state that is not authorized by the license or the terms of a national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) permit issued by the federal environmental protection agency.

(30) “Water quality standard” means a standard set for maximum allowable contamination in surface waters and ground water as set forth in the water quality standards for waters for the state of Idaho.

(31) “Waters of the state” means all the accumulations of water, surface and underground, natural and artificial, public and private, or parts thereof which are wholly or partially within, which flow through or border upon the state.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7903, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 73, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “original effective date of this chapter” in subdivision (11) refers to the effective date of S.L. 2000, ch. 268, which was April 12, 2000.

For natural resources conservation service, conservation practice standard 590, see http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov / references / public / WI/590.pdf .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7904. Site approval required — Site approval is supplemental — Local option — Local action required for department action.

  1. No person may construct or expand a large swine facility regulated by this chapter without first obtaining site approval from the director as provided in this chapter.
  2. The site approval required by this chapter for construction or expansion of a large swine facility is required in addition to requirements of any rules of the department. Further, the site approval required by this chapter must be obtained in addition to any other license, permit or approval required by law or rule.
  3. This chapter does not preempt the local regulation of swine facilities. This chapter provides boards of county commissioners and governing bodies of cities with an optional procedure for siting swine facilities. If boards of county commissioners and governing bodies of cities do not exercise their option to comply with this chapter, they are not subject to its provisions and may exercise individual authority to accept, regulate or reject swine facilities independently of this chapter.
  4. This chapter applies only if the board of county commissioners or governing body of a city, whichever has jurisdiction over the site for a proposed swine facility, chooses to comply with this chapter. If a board of county commissioners or a governing body of a city with jurisdiction chooses not to comply with this chapter, the department is not required to take any action under this chapter.
  5. Boards of county commissioners and governing bodies of cities that choose to comply with this chapter shall signify compliance by resolution or ordinance communicated to the director in writing.
  6. If a board of county commissioners or a governing body of a city chooses to comply with this chapter, the department does not have to issue a determination or notice of environmental suitability of facility location pursuant to its rules for swine facilities, IDAPA 16.01.09 [58.01.09].
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7904, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (6) was added by the compiler to reflect the 2000 amendment of the Idaho Administrative Code, transferring control of service facilities to the department of environmental quality.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7905. Application — Facilities regulated.

  1. The following swine facilities must obtain site approval under this chapter:
    1. New swine facilities having a one-time animal unit capacity of twenty thousand (20,000) or more animal units; and
    2. Existing swine facilities that expand their one-time animal unit capacity to twenty thousand (20,000) animal units or more.
  2. Two (2) or more swine facilities under common owners, operators or those with whom the owners or operators contract or are located within the same county or within five (5) miles of each other shall be considered, for purposes of licensing, to be a single facility regulated under this chapter, even though separately their capacity is less than twenty thousand (20,000) animal units. In each case, the director shall determine whether one (1) or multiple site approvals are required.
    1. Existing swine facilities with a one-time animal unit capacity of twenty thousand (20,000) animal units built and in operation one (1) year or more before the original effective date of this chapter are exempt from the requirement to obtain a site approval pursuant to this chapter unless they expand as provided in this section. However, such facilities shall register with the director within three (3) months after the original effective date of this chapter. The director shall determine the information that must be submitted as part of their registration. (3)(a) Existing swine facilities with a one-time animal unit capacity of twenty thousand (20,000) animal units built and in operation one (1) year or more before the original effective date of this chapter are exempt from the requirement to obtain a site approval pursuant to this chapter unless they expand as provided in this section. However, such facilities shall register with the director within three (3) months after the original effective date of this chapter. The director shall determine the information that must be submitted as part of their registration.
    2. Existing swine facilities required in this subsection to register with the director shall submit a nutrient management plan and closure plan to the director for approval within two (2) years of the original effective date of this chapter in accordance with rules of the department. An application fee shall not be required unless the facility is expanding.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7905, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the original effective date of this chapter” in subsection (3) refers to the effective date of S.L. 2000, ch. 268, which was April 12, 2000.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7906. Director may make rules and contract with other agencies.

  1. The director may adopt administrative rules he deems necessary or helpful to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
  2. The director may enter into contracts, agreements, memorandums and other arrangements with federal, state and local agencies to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7906, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7907. Location guidelines.

This section provides location guidelines for swine facilities regulated by this chapter. Where the location guidelines provide a specific setback distance, that distance is the minimum setback distance that may be imposed. Further setback distances shall be imposed as circumstances require.

  1. A swine facility regulated by this chapter shall not:
    1. Locate its closest waste facility within at least two (2) miles of any occupied residence not owned or leased by the owner or operator of the swine facility;
    2. Land apply liquid animal waste within at least one (1) mile of the nearest corner of an occupied residence not owned or leased by the owner or operator of the swine facility.
  2. The setback distances provided in subsection (1) of this section do not apply if the affected property owner executes a written waiver with the owner or operator of the swine facility, under terms and conditions that the parties may negotiate. The written waiver is effective when recorded in the offices of the recorder of deeds in the county in which the property is located. The recorded waiver shall preclude enforcement of the setback distances contained in subsection (1) of this section. A change in ownership of the applicable property or change in ownership of the swine facility does not affect the validity of the waiver.
  3. All distances between occupied residences and swine facilities shall be measured from the closest corner of the walls of the occupied residence to the closest point of the nearest waste structure or waste facility, as defined by the director.
  4. No liquid animal waste may be land applied within at least one hundred (100) feet of an existing public or private drinking water well.
  5. The minimum distance from a waste structure or waste facility to a domestic well, public well or public water source shall be at least one (1) mile.
  6. Further, swine facilities shall not be located:
    1. In areas designated by the United States fish and wildlife service or the Idaho department of fish and game as critical habitat for endangered or threatened species of plants, fish or wildlife;
    2. So as to be at variance with any locally adopted land use plan or zoning requirement unless otherwise provided by local law or ordinance. If no land use plan has been adopted by the local government which would have land use jurisdiction pursuant to chapter 65, title 67, Idaho Code, the recommendations of the panel approving a site shall contain an analysis of the requirements and guidelines provided in this chapter. The analysis shall be accompanied by findings and conclusions, entered by the local government with jurisdiction after the local government has held a public hearing in accord with section 67-6509, Idaho Code, that the public interest would be served by locating a swine facility on the site for which approval is sought;
    3. No nearer than one (1) mile to any local, state or national park, or land reserved or withdrawn for scenic or natural use; and
    4. No nearer than two (2) miles to a school, church, hospital or community center.
  7. A swine facility active unit shall not be located:
    1. Within a one hundred (100) year flood plain;
    2. Within five hundred (500) feet upstream of a perennial stream or river;
    3. Within one thousand (1,000) feet of any perennial lake or pond;
    4. So as to cause any measurable impact on water quality limited streams;
    5. Within a wetland;
    6. Within two hundred (200) feet to the property line of adjacent land;
    7. Within two hundred (200) feet of a holocene fault or adjacent to geologic features which could compromise the structural integrity of a swine facility active unit unless the owner or operator demonstrates to the director that an alternative setback distance of less than two hundred (200) feet will prevent damage to the structural integrity of the swine facility unit and will be protective of human health and the environment. For the purposes of this subsection:
      1. “Fault” means a fracture or a zone of fractures in any material along which strata on one (1) side have been displaced with respect to that on the other side;
      2. “Displacement” means the relative movement of any two (2) sides of a fault measured in any direction;
      3. “Holocene” means the most recent epoch of the quaternary period, extending from the end of the pleistocene epoch to the present.
      4. “Maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material” means the maximum expected horizontal acceleration depicted on a seismic hazard map, with a ninety percent (90%) or greater probability that the acceleration will not be exceeded in two hundred fifty (250) years, or the maximum expected horizontal acceleration based on a site-specific seismic risk assessment;
      5. “Lithified earth material” means all rock, including all naturally occurring and naturally formed aggregates or masses of minerals or small particles of older rock that formed by crystallization of magma or by induration of loose sediments. This term does not include man-made materials, such as fill, concrete and asphalt, or unconsolidated earth materials, soil, or regolith lying at or near the earth’s surface.
    8. Within seismic impact zones, unless the owner or operator demonstrates to the director that all swine facility active units and surface water control systems, are designed to resist the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material for the site. The owner or operator must place the demonstration in the operating record and notify the director that it has been placed in the operating record. For the purposes of this section:
    9. “Seismic impact zone” means an area with a ten percent (10%) or greater probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material, expressed as a percentage of the earth’s gravitational pull (g), will exceed one-tenth (0.10g) in two hundred fifty (250) years;
      1. On any site whose natural state would be considered unstable in that its undisturbed character would not permit establishment of a swine facility without unduly threatening the integrity of the design due to inherent site instability;
    10. Where the integrity of the site would be compromised by the presence of ground water which would interfere with construction or operation of the active unit.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7907, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 350, § 2, p. 1228.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 350 declared an emergency. Approved April 9, 2001.

§ 39-7908. Site review panels established.

  1. A site review panel shall be established to ensure public input in the siting process and to recommend to the director site approval, approval with conditions or rejection.
  2. A panel shall consist of eight (8) members to be appointed as follows:
    1. Three (3) members shall be the director of the department of environmental quality or his designee, the director of the department of water resources or his designee, and the director of the department of agriculture or his designee.
    2. One (1) member shall be a public member appointed by the governor. The public member shall be an environmental professional, shall serve as chairman of the panel and shall be a voting member. A member who is a public member shall be appointed to serve on site review panels only until the particular site application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    3. Two (2) members shall be appointed by the city council of the city located closest to, or in which the swine facility is proposed to be located or expanded, provided the governing body of the city has signified compliance with this chapter as provided in section 39-7903, Idaho Code. At least one (1) shall be a resident of the city. However, if two (2) cities are equidistant from the proposed or expanding swine facility, plus or minus five (5) miles, the city council of each city shall appoint one (1) member each to the site review panel, each of whom shall be a resident of the city appointing them. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular site application subject to their review is approved or it is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    4. Two (2) members shall be appointed by the county commission and be residents of the county where the swine facility is proposed to be located or expanded, provided the board of county commissioners has signified compliance with this chapter as provided in section 39-7903, Idaho Code. The members serving pursuant to this subsection shall serve until the particular site application subject to their review is approved, or until the application is rejected and is no longer subject to their review.
    5. A person nominated to represent a city or county shall not have a conflict of interest, as that term is defined in section 74-403, Idaho Code, or derive any economic gain as that term is defined in section 74-403, Idaho Code, from the location of the proposed or expanding swine facility.
  3. The director shall notify the city council of the nearest city, or cities if two (2) cities are within five (5) miles of the site of the proposed facility, and the board of county commissioners in which the site is located, of a site application filed with the department and shall instruct the city or cities and county to appoint the necessary members to a panel.
  4. A majority of members of the panel shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business of the panel and the concurrence of a majority of the panel shall constitute a legal action of the panel, provided that no meeting of the panel shall occur unless there are at least as many members present representing the city and county as there are representing the state and the public as appointed pursuant to subsections (2)(a) and (b) of this section. All meetings of the panel shall be conducted pursuant to the state open meeting law.
  5. The director shall make staff available to assist the panel in carrying out its responsibilities. (6) Members of the panel who are not state employees shall be entitled to receive compensation as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7908, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 74, p. 253; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 99, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of agriculture,§ 22-101.

Director of department of environmental quality,§ 39-105.

Director of department of water resources,§ 42-1701.

State open meetings law,§ 74-201 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “74-403” for “59-703” in two instances in paragraph (2)(e).

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7909. Siting application — Fee — Rules.

  1. A site application shall include, in a format set forth by the director and when determined applicable by the director, the following information:
    1. Name, mailing address and phone number of the facility owner;
    2. Name, mailing address and phone number of the facility operator;
    3. Name and mailing address of the facility;
    4. Legal description of the facility location;
    5. The legal structure of the entity owning the facility, including the names and addresses of all directors, officers, registered agents and partners;
    6. The names and locations of all swine facilities owned and/or operated by the applicant within the last ten (10) years;
    7. The one-time animal unit capacity of the facility;
    8. The type of animals to be confined at the facility;
    9. Evidence that a valid water right exists to supply adequate water for the proposed facility or a copy of either an application for a permit to appropriate water or an application to change the point of diversion, place, period and nature of use of an existing water right that has been filed with the Idaho department of water resources which, if approved, will supply adequate water for the proposed operation;
    10. The facility’s biosecurity and sanitary standards.
  2. A facility plan. Plans and specifications for the facility’s animal waste management system that include the following information:
    1. Vicinity map(s) prepared on one (1) or more seven and one-half minute (7.5′) USGS topographic quadrangle maps or a high quality reproduction(s) that includes the following:
      1. Layout of the facility, including buildings and animal waste management system;
      2. The one hundred (100) year FEMA flood zones or other appropriate flood data for the facility site and land application sites owned or leased by the applicant;
      3. The location of occupied dwellings, public and private gathering places, such as schools, churches and parks, and incorporated municipalities which are within a two (2) mile radius of the facility; and
      4. Private and community domestic water wells, irrigation wells, irrigation conveyance and drainage structures, monitoring wells, wetlands, streams, springs, and reservoirs which are within a one (1) mile radius of the facility.
    2. Facility specifications including:
      1. A site plan showing:
      2. Building plans showing:
        1. Building locations;
        2. Waste facilities;
        3. All waste conveyance systems; and
        4. All irrigation systems used for land application, including details of approved water supply protection devices.
  1. All wastewater collection systems in housed units;
  2. All freshwater supply systems, including details of approved water supply protection devices; 3. Detailed drawings of wastewater collection and conveyance systems and containment construction; and
  3. Site characterization. A characterization of the facility and any land application site(s) owned or operated by the applicant, prepared by a registered professional geologist, a registered professional engineer or a qualified ground water hydrologist, that includes the following information:
    1. A description of monitoring methods, frequency and reporting components related to either leak detection systems and/or ground water monitoring wells;
    2. The climatic, hydrogeologic and soil characteristics;
    3. The depth to water and a potentiometric map for the uppermost and regional aquifer;
    4. The vertical and horizontal conductivity, gradient and ground water flow direction and velocity;
    5. Estimates of recharge to the uppermost aquifer;
    6. Information which characterizes the relationship between the ground water and adjacent surface waters; and
    7. A summary of local ground water quality data.
  4. A nutrient management plan. A plan prepared by a certified planner demonstrating compliance with the nutrient management standard for land application.
  5. A plan for meeting standards for heavy metals as those provided in 40 CFR section 503, subchapter O.
  6. A plan for disposal of dead animal carcasses.
  7. An air quality management plan.
  8. A closure plan. A plan describing the procedures for final closure of a facility that ensures no adverse impacts to the environment and waters of the state and that includes:
    1. The estimated length of operation of the facility;
    2. A description of the procedures, methods and schedule to be implemented at the facility for final disposal, handling, management and/or treatment of all animal waste;
    3. A plan for permanent disposal of residual solid waste.
  9. Other information. An applicant shall provide any other information relative to this section and deemed necessary by the director to assess protection of human health and the environment, including information showing that:
    1. The harm to scenic, public health, environmental, private property, historic, cultural or recreational values is not substantial or can be mitigated;
    2. The risk and impact of accident during transportation of animal waste or animal carcasses is not substantial or can be mitigated. Dead animals shall be removed from the facility for rendering, cremation, burial, composting or other disposal in accordance with IDAPA 02.04.03, “Rules of Department of Agriculture Governing Animal Industry,” section 050, “Dead Animals, Movement, Disposal”;
    3. The impact on local government is not adverse regarding health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development or can be mitigated;
    4. The facility or operations associated with the facility do not create a public health hazard or nuisance conditions including odors;
    5. The applicant has the financial ability to construct, operate and close the facility.
  10. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the application, the director shall determine whether it is complete. If it is not complete, the director shall notify the applicant and state the areas of deficiency. (11) The application shall be accompanied by a fee. The director shall establish by rule the scale for determining the application fee. The fee shall be based on the cost to the site review panel of reviewing the application. The scale shall be based on characteristics including the site size, projected waste volume, and hydrogeological and atmospheric characteristics surrounding the site. Fees received pursuant to this section may be expended by the director to pay the actual, reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the department in acting upon an application.

4. Detailed construction and installation procedures.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7909, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The provisions of the Idaho Administrative Code relating to animal industries and the disposal of dead animals were revised in 2002. Rules governing dead animals movement and disposal are now found at IDAPA 02.04.17.

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7910. Duties of the director relative to applications.

  1. Upon determination that a siting application is complete, the director shall:
    1. Notify the permanent panel members, the city and/or county in which the swine facility site is located, the director of the department of fish and game, the director of the department of law enforcement [Idaho state police], and other state agencies as deemed appropriate by the director.
    2. Publish a notice that the application has been received, as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code, in a newspaper having major circulation in the county and the immediate vicinity of the site. The notice shall contain a map indicating the location of the site, a description of the proposed action and the location where the application may be reviewed. The notice shall describe the procedure by which the siting approval under this chapter may be granted.
  2. Upon notification by the director, the chairman shall immediately notify the representatives of the state to the panel and the public members. The chairman shall also notify the applicable county and city for their appointment of members as provided in subsection (2) of section 39-7908, Idaho Code. Within thirty (30) days after the notification, the board of commissioners of the county and the city council shall select the members to serve on the panel. The panel shall be created at that time and notification of the creation of the panel shall be made to the chairman.
  3. Within thirty (30) days after appointment of panel members, the panel shall meet to review and establish a timetable for the consideration of the draft site approval.
  4. The panel shall:
    1. Set a date and arrange for publication of notice of a public hearing in a newspaper having major circulation in the vicinity of the proposed site, at its first meeting. The public notice shall:
      1. Contain a map indicating the location of the site and proposed facility, a description of the proposed action, and the location where the application for a siting approval may be reviewed and where copies may be obtained;
      2. Identify the time, place and location for the public hearing held to receive public comment and input on the application for a siting approval;
    2. Publish the notice not less than thirty (30) days before the date of the public hearing and the notice shall be, at a minimum, a twenty (20) days’ notice as provided in section 60-109, Idaho Code.
  5. Comment and input on the proposed siting of the swine facility may be presented orally or in writing at the public hearing, and shall continue to be accepted in writing by the panel for thirty (30) days after the public hearing date. The public hearing shall be held in the same county as the proposed site. If the proposed site is adjacent to a city or populated area in a neighboring county, it is recommended that public hearings also be held in the neighboring county.
  6. The panel shall consider, but not be limited to, the following:
    1. The risk of the spread of disease or impact upon public health from improper treatment, storage or incineration methods;
    2. The impact on local units of government where the proposed swine facility is to be located in terms of health, safety, cost and consistency with local planning and existing development;
    3. The nature of the probable environmental and public health impact;
    4. The financial capability of the applicant to construct, operate and close the swine facility.
    5. Impact on adjacent property values.
  7. The panel shall consider the concerns and objections submitted by the public. The panel shall facilitate efforts to provide that the concerns and objections are mitigated by proposing additional conditions regarding the construction of the swine facility. The panel may propose conditions which integrate the provisions of the city or county ordinances, permits or requirements.
  8. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after creation, the panel shall issue an approval letter, approval letter with conditions, or rejection. If the panel recommends conditions, a clear statement of the need for a condition must be submitted to the director. If the panel recommends rejection, a clear statement of the reasons for the rejection must be submitted to the director.
  9. The director shall not issue a permit to operate under IDAPA 16.01.09 [58.01.09], unless a site has been approved by the site review panel. Approval of a site by the panel does not require the director to issue a permit to operate under IDAPA 16.01.09 [58.01.09].
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7910, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Director of department of fish and game,§ 36-106.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion was added in paragraph (1)(a) by the compiler to reflect the reorganization of the department of law enforcement as the Idaho state police by S.L. 2000, ch. 469.

The bracketed insertions in subsection (9) were added by the compiler to reflect the 2000 reorganization of the Idaho Administrative Code, transferring the permitting of swine and poultry facilities to the department of environmental quality.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7911. Financial assurance for closure and remediation.

  1. All swine facilities regulated by section 39-104A, Idaho Code, and this chapter shall provide financial assurances demonstrating financial capability to meet requirements for closure of the facilities and remediation. Requirements for financial assurances shall be determined by the agency as set forth in rule. Financial assurances may include any mechanism or combination of mechanisms meeting the requirements established by agency rule including, but not limited to, surety bonds, trust funds, irrevocable letters of credit, insurance and corporate guarantees. The mechanism(s) used to demonstrate financial capability must be legally valid, binding and enforceable under applicable law and must ensure that the funds necessary to meet the costs of closure and remediation will be available whenever the funds are needed. The director may retain financial assurances for up to five (5) years after closure of a facility to ensure proper closure and remediation, as defined by rule.
  2. Nothing in this section prohibits the boards of county commissioners of any county or the governing body of any city from adopting regulations that are more stringent or that require greater financial assurances than those imposed by the department of environmental quality.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7911, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 75, p. 253.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7912. Director may request additional information.

The applicant shall provide the director with additional information the director deems necessary to process an application, within thirty (30) days of the director’s request. The time period within which the director must act with regard to an application shall be stayed until the information requested is provided. If an applicant fails to provide the information within this time period, unless a longer time period is allowed by the director, the director may stop the application process and require the applicant to submit a new application.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7912, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7913. Violations and enforcement.

  1. The following acts are unlawful:
    1. Failure to comply with this chapter and any rules of the department regulating swine facilities, and conditions of site approval granted pursuant to this chapter;
    2. Knowingly making a false statement, representation, or certification in any application report, document, or record developed, maintained, or submitted pursuant to this chapter, rules or conditions of a site approval.
  2. Any person violating this chapter or any site approval or order under this chapter is liable for a civil or criminal penalty in accordance with chapter 1, title 39, Idaho Code. The director may apply the provisions of chapter 1, title 39, Idaho Code, to ensure compliance.
  3. The director may revoke a site approval:
    1. For material violation of any condition of a site approval, final agency order or order or judgment of a court secured by any state or federal agency and relating to the operation of a swine facility;
    2. If an approval was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose all relevant facts;
    3. If approval for adequate water rights cannot be obtained from the Idaho department of water resources;
    4. The site or facility does not meet the requirements of this chapter.
  4. A private right of action on behalf of any person who has been injured or damaged by any approval authorized in this chapter or violation of the terms of any approval or rule authorized in this chapter may be maintained in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and/or the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, as applicable.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-7913, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of water resources,§ 42-1701 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7914. Confidentiality of records.

Information obtained by a public agency pursuant to this chapter or its associated rules is subject to public disclosure pursuant to the provisions of chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. Information submitted under a trade secret claim may be entitled to confidential treatment as provided in section 74-114, Idaho Code, and rules of the department of environmental quality.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7914, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755; am. 2001, ch. 103, § 76, p. 253; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 100, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” and substituted “74-114” for “9-342A”.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7915. Severability clause.

If any provision of this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7915, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

§ 39-7916. Conflicts clause.

If a conflict arises between this chapter and rules of the department regulating swine facilities, the most restrictive provision shall apply.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-7916, as added by 2000, ch. 268, § 1, p. 755.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2000, ch. 268 declared an emergency. Approved April 12, 2000.

Chapter 80 UNIFORM PUBLIC SCHOOL BUILDING SAFETY

Sec.

§ 39-8001. Short title.

This act, comprised of Sections 39-8001, 39-8002, 39-8003, 39-8004, 39-8005, 39-8006, 39-8007, 39-8008, 39-8009, 39-8010, 39-8011 and 39-8012, Idaho Code, shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Uniform School Building Safety Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8001, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 2000, ch. 352, which is compiled as§§ 39-8001 through 39-8006, and 39-8007 through 39-8012, and 39-4113.

§ 39-8002. Declaration of purpose.

The purpose of this act is to assure the safety of children and others who use Idaho’s public schools by providing for a uniform school building safety code to apply to school buildings and by establishing procedures for achieving compliance with the code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8002, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 2000, ch. 352, which is compiled as§§ 39-8001 through 39-8006, and 39-8007 through 39-8012, and 39-4113.

§ 39-8003. Scope.

This act shall apply to all facilities, existing now or constructed in the future, that are owned, leased or used for educational purposes by public school districts, charter schools, or a school for children in any grades kindergarten through twelve (12) that is operated by the state of Idaho receiving state funding. The authority granted under this act shall not prohibit local governments from acting to enforce applicable building and fire codes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8003, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2001, ch. 326, § 4, p. 1143.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 2000, ch. 352, which is compiled as§§ 39-8001 through 39-8006, and 39-8007 through 39-8012, and 39-4113.

Effective Dates.

Section 6 of S.L. 2001, ch. 326 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2001.

§ 39-8004. Definitions.

As used in this act:

  1. “Administrator” means the administrator of the division of building safety or his designated representative.
  2. “Day” shall mean a calendar day unless otherwise specified.
  3. “Imminent safety hazard” means a condition that presents an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury to occupants of a building.
  4. “Licensed professional” means a person licensed by the state of Idaho as an architect or an engineer.
  5. “Local government” means any city or county of this state.
  6. “Serious safety hazard” means a condition that presents an unreasonable health risk or risk of injury to occupants of a building.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8004, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2002, ch. 158, § 2, p. 458.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 2000, ch. 352, which is compiled as§§ 39-8001 through 39-8006, and 39-8007 through 39-8012, and 39-4113.

§ 39-8005. Idaho uniform school building safety code committee created — Appointment — Terms — Quorum — Meetings — Compensation.

There is hereby created within the office of the superintendent of public instruction the Idaho uniform school building safety code committee, hereafter referred to as the committee. The committee shall consist of eight (8) members and shall include one (1) representative from each of the following: the office of the superintendent of public instruction; the division of building safety; and the insurance industry, appointed by the department of insurance. The governor shall appoint three (3) members as follows: one (1) representative of local school boards; one (1) representative of school superintendents and a chairman, all of whom shall serve at his pleasure. The committee shall also include two (2) members of the Idaho legislature, one (1) appointed by the president pro tempore of the senate and one (1) appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives. A majority of the membership of the committee is a quorum. Upon completion of development of the Idaho uniform school safety code provided for in section 39-8006, Idaho Code, the committee shall meet at least annually to review and make any necessary revisions to the Idaho uniform school safety code. Each member of the committee shall be reimbursed for expenses as provided by section 59-509(b), Idaho Code, for each day spent in attendance at meetings of the committee.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8005, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2010, ch. 166, § 1, p. 340.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of insurance,§ 41-201 et seq.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq,

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 166, in the second sentence, substituted “eight (8) members” for “nine (9) members” and deleted “the department of administration” following “the division of business safety.”

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2000, ch. 352, provides: “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 39-8005, Idaho Code, and Section 39-8006, Idaho Code, as enacted by Section 1 of this act, shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval. The remaining provisions of Section 1 of this act, and Section 2 of this act, shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2000.”

§ 39-8006. Committee to develop Idaho uniform school building safety code — Interim code.

  1. The committee shall develop the Idaho uniform school building safety code to be adopted by rule of the administrator pursuant to section 39-8007, Idaho Code. The Idaho uniform school building safety code shall address elements of the national codes identified in section 39-4109, Idaho Code, and rule of the state board of education at IDAPA 08.02.02.130.
  2. Until the Idaho uniform school building safety code is adopted by rule pursuant to section 39-8007, Idaho Code, the national codes adopted under section 39-4109, Idaho Code, and rule of the state board of education at IDAPA 08.02.02.130 shall serve as the interim Idaho uniform school building safety code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8006, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of education,§ 33-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2000, ch. 352, provides: “An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Section 39-8005, Idaho Code, and Section 39-8006, Idaho Code, as enacted by Section 1 of this act, shall be in full force and effect on and after its passage and approval. The remaining provisions of Section 1 of this act, and Section 2 of this act, shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2000.”

§ 39-8006A. Best practices maintenance plan for school buildings.

The administrator of the division of building safety and the state department of education shall consult and shall draft a best practices maintenance plan for school buildings which shall be supplied to the superintendent of each school district. Based on the best practices maintenance plan, each school district shall develop a ten (10) year plan and submit it to the division of building safety for approval. Such plan shall be submitted in all years ending in zero (0) or five (5), and shall include information detailing the work completed pursuant to the previous maintenance plan and any revisions to that plan.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8006A, as added by 2006, ch. 311, § 9, p. 957; am. 2012, ch. 66, § 2, p. 188.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

State department of education,§ 33-125.

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 66, substituted “division of building safety” for “state department of education” near the end of the second sentence; and, in the third sentence, substituted “Such plan shall be submitted in all years ending in zero (0) or five (5), and shall include information” for “Annually thereafter, the school district shall submit a report to the state department of education” and inserted “previous” preceding “maintenance.”

Legislative Intent.
Legislative Findings and Intent

“(1) Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho provides that ‘it shall be the duty of the legislature of Idaho, to establish and maintain a general, uniform and thorough system of public, free common schools.’

“(2) In the case of Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. Evans , 123 Idaho 573 (1993), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the then existing State Board of Education rules for school facilities, textbooks and curriculum, and transportation systems were consistent with the thoroughness requirements of Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho. The Supreme Court remanded the case for trial to determine if the system of funding was providing such school facilities, textbooks and curriculum, and transportation systems called for in the rules.

“(3) In response to that action, the Legislature enacted Section 33-1612, Idaho Code, which defined thoroughness and included ‘a safe environment conducive to learning’ among the statutory definitions of thoroughness. “(4) In a subsequent ruling in the same case, Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. State , 132 Idaho 559 (1999), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the statutory requirement of ‘a safe environment conducive to learning’ and the rules adopted pursuant to it were consistent with the thoroughness requirements of Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho, and that such a safe environment was inherently part of a thorough system of public, free common schools required by Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho. The Supreme Court remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the funding system was providing a safe environment conducive to learning.

“(5) On February 5, 2001, the Fourth Judicial District Court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that the system of school funding then in existence was constitutionally deficient in its ability to repair or replace dangerous or unsafe conditions in school buildings.

“(6) On December 21, 2005, on appeal to the Supreme Court, the Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s February 5, 2001, decision and said:

In sum, the evidence in the record clearly supports the district court’s 2001 Findings. We affirm the conclusion of the district court that the current funding system is simply not sufficient to carry out the Legislature’s duty under the constitution. While the Legislature has made laudable efforts to address the safety concerns of various school districts, the task is not yet complete. The appropriate remedy, however, must be fashioned by the Legislature and not this Court. Quite simply, Article IX of our constitution means what it says: “[I]t shall be the duty of the Legislature of Idaho, to establish and maintain a general, uniform and thorough system of public, free common schools.” Thus, it is the duty of the State, and not this Court or the local school districts, to meet this constitutional mandate.

“(7) In response to the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision, and mindful that the Supreme Court has recognized the Legislature’s efforts, following the district court’s decision in 2001, to provide a system of funding that provides safe schools, it is the purpose of this Act to fulfill the Legislature’s responsibility under Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho, by establishing an ongoing, state-funded system for funding repair or replacement of unsafe school facilities in a manner that fairly and equitably balances the state and local contributions. It requires funds to be dedicated to maintenance to arrest deterioration of schools before they become unsafe.

“(8) In proposing this Act, it is the intent of the Legislature to:

“(a) Amend the statutes addressing the School District Building Account to provide an ongoing means of providing funds from that account for the purpose of assisting school districts to fund repair or replacement of unsafe school facilities; and

“(b) Remove all artificial limits on the functioning of the bond levy equalization value index. The index measures a school district’s relative ability to pay, and provides a secure, ongoing revenue source for the bond levy equalization program, enabling each school district’s full share of state lottery funds to be used for school building maintenance and repairs; and

“(c) Establish an ongoing School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program to assist school districts to fund repair or replacement of unsafe school buildings when school districts are unable to fund necessary repair or replacement; and

“(d) Provide ongoing, fair and equitable state assistance to school districts under the School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program whereby the state initially funds the total cost of repair and replacement that school districts are unable to fund themselves. It creates the necessary taxing authority to pay the school district’s share of the cost of repair or replacement, and establishes a statutory formula to annually determine the school district’s fair and equitable share of the costs of repair or replacement that compares the school district’s bonds and/or plant facilities levy rates to the statewide average bond and/or facility levy rate; and “(e) Require each school district to annually set aside an adequate amount of moneys for the exclusive purpose of school building maintenance in order to arrest deterioration in school facilities that have lead to unsafe conditions and to provide a sliding scale of state match subsidies for this amount based upon the school district’s relative ability to pay.”

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 13 of S.L. 2006, ch. 311 provided: “Nonseverability. With the exception of Sections 4, 11 and 12 of this act, the remaining provisions of this act are hereby declared to be nonseverable and if any provision of the remaining portions of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall render all such remaining portions of this act null, void and of no force or effect.”

§ 39-8007. Powers and duties of the administrator.

  1. The administrator shall enforce the provisions of this chapter in cooperation with the superintendent of public instruction and the building code advisory board [Idaho building code board].
  2. The administrator shall promulgate rules necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. Such rules shall be promulgated pursuant to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  3. The administrator shall establish a program for the timely review of public school construction plans as required by section 39-4113(4)(f), Idaho Code.
  4. Upon request, the administrator shall provide training to school districts on the Idaho uniform school building safety code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8007, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2009, ch. 219, § 3, p. 681; am. 2010, ch. 166, § 2, p. 340; am. 2010, ch. 174, § 2, p. 357.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2009 amendment, by ch. 219, in subsection (3), deleted “all” preceding “public school construction plans” and updated the section reference in light of the 2009 amendment for§ 39-4113.

This section was amended by two 2010 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 166, deleted “the department of administration” following “superintendent of public instruction” in subsection (1).

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 174, updated the section reference in subsection (3) in light of the 2010 amendment of§ 39-4113.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (1) was added by the compiler to reflect the 2002 name change of the referenced agency. See§ 39-4106.

§ 39-8008. Additional duties of administrator — Right of inspection — Posting.

  1. The administrator shall have authority under this section to enter all public school facilities covered by this chapter at reasonable times to inspect, on an annual basis, such facilities for compliance with the Idaho uniform school building safety code; provided however, that inspections shall take into account the age of the school facilities and the appropriate codes that would have been in effect at the time of the construction of such facilities; provided further, that regardless of the codes in effect at the time of construction, imminent safety hazards found in public school facilities shall be identified and the provisions of this chapter relating to such imminent safety hazards shall apply.
  2. If the administrator finds a violation of the Idaho uniform school building safety code that he concludes does not constitute an imminent safety hazard or serious safety hazard, he shall notify in writing the school district superintendent, principal, board member, or other person in charge. Such notification shall state, in bold print, that the citations for violations or nonconformances constitute recommendations only.
  3. If the administrator finds a violation of the Idaho uniform school building safety code that he concludes constitutes a serious safety hazard, he shall immediately issue a written order or notice requiring the school superintendent, principal, board of trustees or other person in charge to eliminate the condition without delay and within the time specified by the administrator in the notice or order, but not exceeding one (1) year. The administrator may also designate a licensed professional to independently evaluate the identified condition prior to issuing a written order to eliminate the condition.
  4. If the administrator finds a violation of the Idaho uniform school building safety code that he concludes constitutes an imminent safety hazard, he shall, within two (2) working days, designate a licensed professional to independently evaluate the identified condition prior to issuing any report under this chapter. That licensed professional shall, within fourteen (14) days, complete its independent evaluation of the condition identified by the administrator and notify the administrator of its conclusions. If the administrator determines that the condition constituting an imminent safety hazard could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm before the evaluation of the designated licensed professional can be completed and before the condition can be eliminated, he shall determine the extent of the area where such condition exists and thereupon shall issue a written order or notice requiring the school district superintendent, principal, board of trustees or other person in charge to cause all persons, except those necessary to eliminate the condition, to be withdrawn from, and to be restrained from entering, such area pending the evaluation of the designated licensed professional. This order shall be withdrawn if the evaluation of the designated licensed professional does not concur with the administrator that the condition constitutes an imminent safety hazard as could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm before the condition can be eliminated.
  5. If upon receipt of the findings of the designated licensed professional, the administrator concludes that any condition identified by such licensed professional constitutes an imminent safety hazard, the administrator shall immediately serve, or cause to be served, written notice or order upon the school district superintendent, principal, board of trustees or other person in charge describing the imminent safety hazard. The administrator shall also notify in writing the state superintendent of public instruction of such imminent safety hazard. Upon receipt of such written notice or order, the school district superintendent, principal, board of trustees, or other person in charge shall require all changes necessary to eliminate the imminent safety hazard be made, without delay and within the time specified by the administrator in the notice or order. If the condition presenting an imminent safety hazard is not corrected within the specified time, or if the administrator determines that the condition constituting such imminent safety hazard could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm before the condition can be eliminated, if he has not previously done so he shall determine the extent of the area where such condition exists and thereupon shall issue an order or notice requiring the school district superintendent, principal, board member, or other person in charge to cause all persons, except those necessary to eliminate the condition, to be withdrawn from, and to be restrained from entering, such area. The school district superintendent, principal, board member, or other person in charge shall assist the administrator as necessary to post such areas to prevent injury. (6) If the administrator finds a violation of the Idaho uniform school building safety code that he concludes constitutes a serious safety hazard and issues a written order or notice requiring the conditions to be eliminated in not more than one (1) year, and the school superintendent, principal, board of trustees, or other person in charge contests the administrator’s finding that the condition is a serious safety hazard, then the school superintendent, principal, board of trustees, or other person in charge shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of the issuance of the administrator’s written order or notice to request a hearing to initiate a contested case under chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. If a hearing is requested, the superintendent of public instruction shall appoint a hearing officer to consider the contested case. All administrative proceedings under this subsection shall be expedited as necessary to assure that serious safety hazards are eliminated as required by this section if the administrator’s initial determination that there was a serious safety hazard is confirmed in the contested case proceedings.

(7) The administrator shall monitor the school district’s progress in addressing any identified imminent safety hazard or serious safety hazard to ensure that appropriate corrective action was taken. The administrator may extend the time for completing corrective action if he deems necessary.

(8) Upon completion of corrective action and verification of such completion by the division of building safety and the department of administration, the administrator shall provide a report to the state superintendent of public instruction, the local superintendent of schools and the chair of the local school board.

(9) Annual inspections of public school facilities conducted by the administrator under the provisions of this section shall be funded pursuant to legislative appropriation.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8008, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2001, ch. 326, § 5, p. 1143; am. 2002, ch. 126, § 2, p. 352; am. 2002, ch. 158, § 3, p. 458; am. 2003, ch. 16, § 10, p. 48; am. 2010, ch. 166, § 3, p. 340.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of administration,§ 67-5701 et seq.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2002 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2002 amendment, by ch. 126, in subsection (1), inserted “under this section” following “shall have authority,” substituted “at reasonable times to inspect, on an annual basis, such facilities for compliance” for “at reasonable times and to inspect such facilities for compliance”; added the last two clauses; in subsection (2), added the last sentence; and added present subsection (10).

The 2002 amendment, by ch. 158, in subsection (2), inserted “or serious safety hazard” following “an imminent safety hazard,” added present subsections (3) and (7), and redesignated former subsections (3) through (7) as present subsections (4) through (9), in present subsection (4), in the fourth sentence, substituted “board of trustees” for “board member”; in present subsection (6), in the first and second sentences, substituted “board of trustees” for “board member”.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 166, added the last sentence in subsection (3); in subsection (4), in the first sentence, deleted “immediately notify the department of administration and request that the department of administration” following “he shall,” and inserted “within 2 working days” and “identified,” deleted the former second sentence, which read: “The department of administration shall, within two (2) working days, designate a licensed professional to independently evaluate the condition identified,” in the second sentence, substituted “administrator” for “director of the department of administration,” and throughout the last two sentences, substituted “designated licensed professional” for “department of administration”; deleted subsection (5), which dealt with duties of the department of administration regarding imminent safety hazards, and redesignated subsections accordingly; and in the first sentence in subsection (5), substituted the language beginning “If upon receipt” and ending “constitutes an imminent safety hazard” for “Upon receipt of such notification in writing.”

Effective Dates.

Section 6 of S.L. 2001, ch. 326 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2001.

Section 18 of S.L. 2003, ch. 16 declared an emergency. Approved February 12, 2003.

§ 39-8009. Injunction.

Upon failure of the district superintendent, principal, board of trustees, or other person in charge to comply with the requirements stated in any notice or order relating to an imminent safety hazard or serious safety hazard, the administrator may maintain an action in the name of the state of Idaho to enjoin the district superintendent, principal, board of trustees or other person in charge from acting in violation of such notice or order or from doing any action that interferes with the administrator carrying out his statutory duties. Such action shall be brought in the district court in which said acts are claimed to have been committed by filing a verified complaint setting forth said act. The court, if satisfied from such complaint or affidavits that the act complained of has been or is being committed and will persist, may issue a temporary writ without notice or bond enjoining the defendant from the commission of such act pending final disposition of the cause. The cause shall proceed as in other causes for injunction. If, at the trial, the commission of said act by the defendant be established and the court further finds it probable that the defendant will continue in such act or similar acts, the court shall enter a decree enjoining said defendant from committing said or similar acts.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8009, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2002, ch. 158, § 4, p. 458.

§ 39-8010. Appeal to building code advisory board [Idaho building code board].

  1. The Idaho building code advisory board [Idaho building code board] shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of notice for an appeal, hear such appeal brought before it by a school district affected by any finding pursuant to this chapter that there exists in a school building a violation of the uniform school building safety code, provided however, that an appeal brought pursuant to this section shall not affect the ability of the administrator to obtain an injunction pursuant to section 39-8009, Idaho Code. Such hearing shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. Final decisions of the board, other than code interpretations, are subject to judicial review in accordance with the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code.
  2. The board shall provide reasonable interpretations of the codes enumerated in this chapter.
  3. Within ten (10) days of the conclusion of the hearing, the board shall render its findings and decisions in writing to the state superintendent of public instruction, the administrator of the division of building safety and the appealing district.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8010, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2010, ch. 166, § 4, p. 340.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2010 amendment, by ch. 166, deleted “the director of the department of administration” following “superintendent of public instruction” in subsection (3).

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in the section heading and in subsection (1) were added by the compiler to reflect the 2002 name change of the referenced agency. See§ 39-4106.

§ 39-8011. Violations.

  1. If a school district, the district superintendent, principal, board of trustees, or other person in charge willfully violates the provisions of this chapter, the state superintendent of public instruction shall withhold such ensuing apportionments as are necessary to make repairs to abate the identified imminent safety hazard or serious safety hazard. Withheld funds, not to exceed one and one-half percent (1 ½%) of the district’s appropriation, shall be disbursed only to pay for such repairs.
  2. If the funds that would be raised over two (2) fiscal years from applying the provisions of subsection (1) of this section are insufficient, in combination with all moneys that will be available in the district’s school building maintenance allocation for the same period, to provide sufficient moneys to abate the identified imminent or serious safety hazard, then the administrator shall submit an application to abate said hazard to the Idaho public school facilities cooperative funding program panel pursuant to section 33-909, Idaho Code.
  3. It is a misdemeanor to remove, without permission of the administrator, a notice or order posted pursuant to this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8011, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182; am. 2002, ch. 158, § 5, p. 458; am. 2006, ch. 311, § 10, p. 957; am. 2007, ch. 142, § 2, p. 412.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for misdemeanor when not otherwise provided,§ 18-113.

Superintendent of public instruction,§ 67-1501 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 311, added subsection (2) and redesignated former subsection (2) as (3).

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 142, in subsection (2), substituted “maintenance allocation” for “maintenance fund” near the middle.

Legislative Intent.
Legislative Findings and Intent

“(1) Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho provides that ‘it shall be the duty of the legislature of Idaho, to establish and maintain a general, uniform and thorough system of public, free common schools.’

“(2) In the case of Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. Evans , 123 Idaho 573 (1993), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the then existing State Board of Education rules for school facilities, textbooks and curriculum, and transportation systems were consistent with the thoroughness requirements of Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho. The Supreme Court remanded the case for trial to determine if the system of funding was providing such school facilities, textbooks and curriculum, and transportation systems called for in the rules. “(3) In response to that action, the Legislature enacted Section 33-1612, Idaho Code, which defined thoroughness and included ‘a safe environment conducive to learning’ among the statutory definitions of thoroughness.

“(4) In a subsequent ruling in the same case, Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. State , 132 Idaho 559 (1999), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the statutory requirement of ‘a safe environment conducive to learning’ and the rules adopted pursuant to it were consistent with the thoroughness requirements of Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho, and that such a safe environment was inherently part of a thorough system of public, free common schools required by Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho. The Supreme Court remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the funding system was providing a safe environment conducive to learning.

“(5) On February 5, 2001, the Fourth Judicial District Court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that the system of school funding then in existence was constitutionally deficient in its ability to repair or replace dangerous or unsafe conditions in school buildings.

“(6) On December 21, 2005, on appeal to the Supreme Court, the Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s February 5, 2001, decision and said:

In sum, the evidence in the record clearly supports the district court’s 2001 Findings. We affirm the conclusion of the district court that the current funding system is simply not sufficient to carry out the Legislature’s duty under the constitution. While the Legislature has made laudable efforts to address the safety concerns of various school districts, the task is not yet complete. The appropriate remedy, however, must be fashioned by the Legislature and not this Court. Quite simply, Article IX of our constitution means what it says: “[I]t shall be the duty of the Legislature of Idaho, to establish and maintain a general, uniform and thorough system of public, free common schools.” Thus, it is the duty of the State, and not this Court or the local school districts, to meet this constitutional mandate.

“(7) In response to the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision, and mindful that the Supreme Court has recognized the Legislature’s efforts, following the district court’s decision in 2001, to provide a system of funding that provides safe schools, it is the purpose of this Act to fulfill the Legislature’s responsibility under Section 1, Article IX, of the Constitution of the state of Idaho, by establishing an ongoing, state-funded system for funding repair or replacement of unsafe school facilities in a manner that fairly and equitably balances the state and local contributions. It requires funds to be dedicated to maintenance to arrest deterioration of schools before they become unsafe.

“(8) In proposing this Act, it is the intent of the Legislature to:

“(a) Amend the statutes addressing the School District Building Account to provide an ongoing means of providing funds from that account for the purpose of assisting school districts to fund repair or replacement of unsafe school facilities; and

“(b) Remove all artificial limits on the functioning of the bond levy equalization value index. The index measures a school district’s relative ability to pay, and provides a secure, ongoing revenue source for the bond levy equalization program, enabling each school district’s full share of state lottery funds to be used for school building maintenance and repairs; and

“(c) Establish an ongoing School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program to assist school districts to fund repair or replacement of unsafe school buildings when school districts are unable to fund necessary repair or replacement; and “(d) Provide ongoing, fair and equitable state assistance to school districts under the School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program whereby the state initially funds the total cost of repair and replacement that school districts are unable to fund themselves. It creates the necessary taxing authority to pay the school district’s share of the cost of repair or replacement, and establishes a statutory formula to annually determine the school district’s fair and equitable share of the costs of repair or replacement that compares the school district’s bonds and/or plant facilities levy rates to the statewide average bond and/or facility levy rate; and

“(e) Require each school district to annually set aside an adequate amount of moneys for the exclusive purpose of school building maintenance in order to arrest deterioration in school facilities that have lead to unsafe conditions and to provide a sliding scale of state match subsidies for this amount based upon the school district’s relative ability to pay.”

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 13 of S.L. 2006, ch. 311 provided: “Nonseverability. With the exception of Sections 4, 11 and 12 of this act, the remaining provisions of this act are hereby declared to be nonseverable and if any provision of the remaining portions of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall render all such remaining portions of this act null, void and of no force or effect.”

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2007, ch. 142 declared an emergency retroactively to July 1, 2006 and approved March 21, 2007.

§ 39-8012. Severability.

If any portion of this act, or the application of any provision of this act to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this act, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8012, as added by 2000, ch. 352, § 1, p. 1182.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” refer to S.L. 2000, ch. 352, which is compiled as§§ 39-8001 through 39-8006, and 39-8007 through 39-8012, and 39-4113.

Chapter 81 BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8101. Short title.

This act may be known and cited as the “Basin Environmental Improvement Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8101, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 66, 357 and 371 of S.L. 2001 each purported to enact a new chapter 81 in title 39. Accordingly, ch. 66 was codified as title 39, chapter 83 (§§ [39-8301] 39-8101 to [39-8302] 39-8102), ch. 357 was codified as title 39, ch. 82 (§§ [39-8201] 39-8101 to [39-8207] 39-8107) and ch. 371 was codified as title 39, chapter 81 (§§ 39-8101 to 39-8115). The compiler had inserted bracketed section designations in the enactments by ch. 66 and 357 to indicate the necessary change in numbering from the law as enacted. Those redesignations of the provisions enacted by S.L. 2001, ch. 357 were made permanent by S.L. 2005, ch. 25. The provisions enacted by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 1 were repealed by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 2, effective July 1, 2003.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2001, ch. 371, which is codified as§ 39-3613 and 39-8101 to 39-8115.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8102. Policy of state.

The Idaho legislature declares that environmental protection and improvement of the Coeur d’Alene basin to protect human health and enhance natural resources is very important to the state. Therefore, it is the policy of the state to provide in this chapter a system for environmental remediation, natural resource restoration and related measures to address heavy metal contamination in the basin. The system provided in this chapter is intended to protect and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people of Idaho in a manner consistent with local, state, federal and tribal participation and resources.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8102, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8103. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:

  1. “Administrator” means the administrator or a member of the board of administrators of the basin environmental improvement fund and financing authority.
  2. “Basin” means the watershed of Coeur d’Alene Lake within the counties of Shoshone, Kootenai and Benewah in the state of Idaho.
  3. “Basin environmental improvement fund and financing authority” or “financing authority” means the entity established by the authority of this chapter, and agreements, compacts, reciprocal legislation or resolutions with or by the United States of America, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the state of Washington to accept and invest funds and finance the activities of the basin project.
  4. “Basin environmental improvement project” or “basin project” means the environmental and natural resources restoration and related measures regarding heavy metal contamination in the basin undertaken by the commission.
  5. “Basin environmental improvement project commission” or “commission” means the entity organized by the authority of this chapter and agreements, compacts, reciprocal legislation or resolutions with or by the United States of America, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the state of Washington to implement the basin project.
  6. “Board of administrators” or “administrators” means the administrator or board of administrators of the basin environmental improvement fund and financing authority.
  7. “Board of commissioners” or “commission” means the board of commissioners of the basin environmental improvement project commission.
  8. “Bonds” or “notes” or “bond anticipation notes” or “other obligations” means any bonds, notes, debentures, interim certificates or other evidence of financial indebtedness issued by the financing authority pursuant to this chapter.
  9. “Commissioner” means a member of the board of commissioners of the basin environmental improvement project commission.
  10. “Executive director” means the executive director of the basin environmental improvement project commission.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8103, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8104. Establishment of agreements or compacts for participation in basin project commission.

The director of the department of environmental quality and the attorney general of the state of Idaho or their delegates shall represent the state of Idaho in negotiations with representatives of the state of Washington, the Coeur d’Alene tribe and the United States of America for the purpose of reaching agreements or compacts between the state of Idaho and any or all of the other named governments regarding participation in the basin project commission and the basin financing authority, for the purpose of providing for environmental remediation and natural resource restoration in the Coeur d’Alene basin in a manner consistent with local, state, federal and tribal authorities and resources; provided however, that any agreement or compact entered into on behalf of the named governments shall not be binding or obligatory upon any of those governments until the agreement or compact is approved by the requisite named governments. The governor of the state of Idaho may enter into any agreement or compact consistent with this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8104, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Director of department of environmental quality,§ 39-105.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8105. Governor shall request reciprocal legislation or resolution.

The governor of the state of Idaho shall advise the chairman of the Coeur d’Alene tribe, the governor of the state of Washington and the president of the United States of America of the enactment of this chapter and request that, if necessary, reciprocal resolutions or legislation be enacted by those governments to authorize negotiation and entry into agreements or compacts regarding participation in the basin environmental improvement project commission and financing authority.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8105, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8106. Basin project commission — Establishment — Composition — Powers — Duties — Funding.

  1. The basin environmental improvement project commission is hereby created and shall become operational when the director of the department of environmental quality, by execution of an appropriate order, determines that:
    1. Significant funds from any source have been provided to the basin improvement fund and financing authority; or
    2. Any one (1) or more agreements or compacts have been entered into between the state of Idaho and the state of Washington, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the United States of America providing for participation in the basin project commission and financing authority.
  2. Any agreement or compact providing for participation in the basin project commission and financing authority shall be consistent with the terms of this chapter.
  3. The board of commissioners of the basin project commission shall include one (1) representative of the state of Idaho and one (1) representative from each of the county commissions of Shoshone, Kootenai and Benewah counties of the state of Idaho as appointed by the governor of the state of Idaho. Upon participation of the state of Washington, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the United States of America through agreement or compact, the board of commissioners shall also include, according to such participation: one (1) representative of the state of Washington appointed by the governor of Washington; one (1) tribal council member of the Coeur d’Alene tribe appointed by the council of the Coeur d’Alene tribe; and one (1) representative of the United States of America appointed by the president of the United States of America.
  4. The commission shall act by majority vote except that the vote of any commissioner representative of the state of Idaho, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the United States of America, or the unanimous vote of all three (3) commissioners representing Shoshone, Kootenai and Benewah counties, may veto any majority vote, in which event the action is not valid. The fiduciary duties of each commissioner shall be to their respective federal, tribal, state, or local governmental entity and such duties shall not disqualify any commissioner from full participation in any commission action. The commission may establish an advisory group to provide local citizen input to the commission in the performance of its duties. The commission shall distribute and publish a public involvement policy, to include procedures to assure adherence to the open meeting law and the public records act.
  5. The commission shall adopt as the basin project workplan a record of decisions approved pursuant to the federal comprehensive environmental responsibility [response,] compensation and liability act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended, by the environmental protection agency of the United States of America, the department of environmental quality of the state of Idaho and, upon its participation, the Coeur d’Alene tribe, for environmental remediation and related measures pertaining to contamination by heavy metals in the basin. Amendment of the basin project workplan shall be made by the commission upon approval of the United States environmental protection agency, the Idaho department of environmental quality and the Coeur d’Alene tribe.
  6. The commission shall, to the extent that funds are available from the financing authority and any other source, implement the basin project workplan.
  7. The commission may select institutional control measures in implementation of the basin project workplan. The measures shall be adopted and implemented by appropriate local and tribal governments as a condition of remediation or restoration activities within those jurisdictions.
  8. The commission shall appoint an executive director to administer the basin project.
  9. The commission shall annually fix and determine, consistent with the basin project workplan and its schedule, the priorities of the basin project, the amount of money required from the financing authority, federal grants and taxation for implementing the basin project priorities including costs of construction and other activities, costs of operation and maintenance of the work, equipment of the basin project, and costs of administration.
  10. The commission shall have, within the basin, the authority of a board of commissioners of a flood control district as provided in chapter 31, title 42, Idaho Code, and the authority of a board of commissioners of a drainage district as provided in chapters 29 and 30, title 42, Idaho Code.
  11. The commission shall have the following powers and duties which may be exercised through the executive director of the basin project commission:
    1. To employ personnel as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the basin project commission;
    2. To sue and be sued in the name of the basin project commission and to make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its power;
    3. To manage and conduct the business and affairs of the basin project commission, both within and without the basin;
    4. To design, construct, operate and maintain structural works and actions as provided by the basin project workplan or procure or contract for the performance of those works and actions or portions thereof by any local, state, tribal or federal governmental entity or any private entity or individual;
    5. To prescribe the duties of officers, agents and employees as may be required;
    6. To establish the fiscal year of the basin project commission, to keep records of all business transactions of the basin project commission and to provide an annual public accounting of all expenditures;
    7. To obtain options upon and acquire by purchase, exchange, lease, gift, grant, bequest, devise, or otherwise, any real or personal property, and improve any properties acquired; to receive income from properties and to expend the income in carrying out the purposes and provisions of the basin project commission; and to lease any of its property or interest therein in furtherance of the purposes and provisions of the basin project commission;
    8. To convey rights-of-way and easements for highways, public roads, public utilities, and for other purposes, over basin project property, as shall be determined by the commission to be in the best interests of the basin project;
    9. To convey by deed, bill of sale, or other appropriate instrument all of the estate and interest of the basin project commission, in any real or personal property;
    10. To enter into contracts or agreements with the United States of America or any of its agencies, the states of Idaho or Washington or any of their agencies or political subdivisions or the Coeur d’Alene tribe or any of its agencies or subdivisions or private entities or individuals and to cooperate with those governments, agencies, subdivisions, private entities or individuals in effectuating, promoting and accomplishing the purposes of the basin project;
    11. To bear its allocated share of the cost of any project resulting from any contract or agreement entered into as provided in this chapter;
    12. To assume, administer and maintain pursuant to any agreement or contract entered into in accordance with this chapter any environmental remediation or restoration measure within the basin undertaken by or in cooperation with the United States of America or any of its agencies, the states of Idaho or Washington or any of their agencies or subdivisions, or the Coeur d’Alene tribe or any of its agencies or subdivisions, or any combinations thereof;
    13. To accept donations, gifts and contributions in money, services, materials, or otherwise, from the United States of America or any of its agencies, or the states of Idaho or Washington or any of their agencies or political subdivisions, or the Coeur d’Alene tribe or any of its agencies or subdivisions, or private entities or individuals, or any combinations thereof, and to expend such moneys, services, or materials in carrying on its operations;
    14. To exercise all other powers necessary or helpful in carrying out the purposes and provisions of the basin project commission as provided in this chapter and by agreements or compacts between the states of Idaho and Washington, the Coeur d’Alene tribe and the United States of America.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8106, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295; am. 2002, ch. 39, § 1, p. 87; am. 2003, ch. 220, § 1, p. 570.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The open meetings law, referred to near the end of subsection (4), is codified as§ 74-201 et seq.

The public records act, referred to at the end of subsection (4), is codified as§74-101 et seq.

The bracketed insertion in subsection (5) was added by the compiler to correct the name of the referenced federal act. See 42 USCS § 9601 et seq.

For more on the basin environmental improvement project commission, see http://www.basincommission.com .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

Section 2 of S.L. 2002, ch. 39 declared an emergency. Approved February 19, 2002.

Section 2 of S.L. 2003, ch. 220 declared an emergency. Approved April 4, 2003.

§ 39-8107. Basin fund and financing authority — Establishment — Administrators — Powers.

  1. The basin environmental improvement fund and financing authority is hereby created and shall become operational when the director of the department of environmental quality, by execution of an appropriate order, determines that significant funds have been provided to the financing authority from any source, or any one (1) or more agreements or compacts between the state of Idaho and the state of Washington, the Coeur d’Alene tribe or the United States of America providing for participation in the basin project commission and financing authority. The financing authority shall be an independent public body corporate and politic within the meaning of section 1, article viii, of the constitution of the state of Idaho, with no power to levy taxes or to obligate the general fund of the state of Idaho.
  2. The administrator or board of administrators of the financing authority shall consist of one (1) representative appointed by the governor of the state of Idaho. Upon participation in the basin project by agreement or compact, one (1) representative shall be appointed by the council of the Coeur d’Alene tribe, one (1) representative shall be appointed by the governor of the state of Washington and one (1) representative shall be appointed by the president of the United States of America. Appointments shall be made on the basis of demonstrated investment and financial management expertise. Each administrator shall serve at the pleasure of his or her respective appointing authority and may be removed and replaced at any time. Administrators shall not be compensated. Two (2) or more administrators shall constitute a board and may act by majority vote. Meetings shall be held whenever a majority of administrators so request. The administrator or board of administrators shall direct the activities of the financing authority.
  3. The funds of the financing authority may include moneys and any income paid in settlement of any claims or lawsuits regarding heavy metals contamination in the basin, annual appropriations by the states of Idaho and Washington or the Coeur d’Alene tribe, receipts from the issuance of bonds and any other source, public or private. To the extent allowed by law, the funds of the financing authority shall not be considered federal funds and shall be available for use as state matching funds for federal grants.
  4. The financing authority may administer its funds to maximize income to fund the basin project. The financing authority is hereby authorized to invest any funds not needed for immediate use or disbursement, including any funds held in reserve, in:
    1. Bonds, notes and other obligations of the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof and other securities secured by such bonds, notes or other obligations;
    2. Money market funds which are insured or the assets of which are limited to obligations of the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof;
    3. Time certificates of deposit and savings accounts; and
    4. Commercial paper which, at the time of its purchase, is rated in the highest category by a nationally recognized rating service.
  5. The financing authority may contract for services deemed necessary to carry out its duties including, but not limited to, financial, legal and accounting services.
  6. The financing authority may provide moneys from its funds to the basin project commission not to exceed such amounts as annually may be requested by the basin project commission.
  7. The financing authority shall establish its fiscal year, keep records of all investments, expenditures and business transactions and provide for an annual public accounting.
  8. The financing authority may exercise all other powers necessary or appropriate to carry out its corporate purposes including, without limitation, the following:
    1. To sue and be sued in its own name;
    2. To have an official seal and to alter the seal at its pleasure;
    3. To maintain an office at a place or places within this state as it may designate;
    4. To hire officers, agents and employees as may be required and to prescribe its duties;
    5. To make and execute contracts and all other instruments necessary or convenient for the exercise of its powers and functions;
    6. To obtain insurance against any loss in connection with its property and other assets in amounts and from insurers it deems desirable;
    7. To borrow money and issue bonds and notes or other evidences of indebtedness as hereinafter provided; and
    8. To the extent permitted under its contract with the holders of bonds, notes and other obligations of the financing authority, to consent to any modification of any contract, lease or agreement of any kind to which the financing authority is a party.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8107, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8108. Financing authority may issue notes and bonds — Related powers and duties.

  1. The financing authority may issue from time to time its notes and bonds in a principal amount as the financing authority determines to be necessary to provide sufficient funds for achieving any of its corporate purposes, including the payment of interest on notes and bonds of the financing authority, establishment of reserves to secure notes and bonds, and all other expenditures of the financing authority incident to and necessary or convenient to carry out its corporate purposes and powers.
  2. The financing authority may issue:
    1. Bonds or notes, in one (1) or more series, to finance the basin project or any portion or portions thereof;
    2. Notes in anticipation of appropriations or other revenues;
    3. Notes to renew notes; and
    4. Bonds to pay notes, including the interest thereon, and whenever it deems refunding expedient, to refund any bonds by the issuance of new bonds, whether the bonds to be refunded have or have not matured, and to issue bonds partly to refund bonds then outstanding and partly for any of its corporate purposes. The refunding bonds may be:
      1. Exchanged for bonds to be refunded; or
      2. Sold and the proceeds applied to the purchase, redemption or payment of such bonds.
  3. Every issue of its notes and bonds shall be special obligations of the financing authority payable out of such fund or funds as shall be specified by the financing authority.
    1. The notes and bonds shall be authorized by resolution or resolutions of the financing authority, shall bear a date or dates and shall mature at a time or times as the resolution or resolutions may provide, except that no note shall mature more than one (1) year from the date of its issue and no bond shall mature more than thirty (30) years from the date of its issue. The bonds may be issued as serial bonds payable in annual installments or as term bonds or as a combination thereof. The notes and bonds shall bear interest at a rate or rates, be in denominations, be in a form, either coupon or registered, carry registration privileges, be executed in a manner, be payable in a medium of payment, at a place or places, and be subject to terms of redemption as the resolution or resolutions may provide. The notes and bonds of the financing authority may be sold by the financing authority, at public or private sale, at a price or prices, at, above, or below par, as the financing authority shall determine.
    2. Any resolution or resolutions authorizing any notes or bonds or any issue thereof may contain provisions, which shall be a part of the contract or contracts with the holders thereof, as to:
      1. Pledging all or any part of the revenues to secure the payment of the notes or bonds or of any issue thereof, subject to such agreements with noteholders or bondholders as may then exist;
      2. Pledging all or any part of the assets of the financing authority to secure the payment of the notes or bonds or of any issue of notes or bonds, subject to agreements with noteholders or bondholders as may then exist;
      3. The setting aside of reserves or sinking funds and the regulation and disposition thereof; (iv) Limitations on the purpose to which the proceeds of sale of notes or bonds may be applied;
      4. Limitations on the issuance of additional notes or bonds, the terms upon which additional notes or bonds may be issued and secured, and the refunding of outstanding or other notes or bonds;
      5. The procedure, if any, by which the terms of any contract with noteholders or bondholders may be amended or abrogated, the amount of notes or bonds the holders of which must consent thereto, and the manner in which such consent may be given;
      6. Limitations on the amount of moneys to be expended by the financing agency for operating expenses of the financing authority;
      7. Vesting in a trustee’s or trustees’ property, rights, powers and duties in trust as the financing authority may determine, which may include any or all of the rights, powers and duties of the trustee appointed by the bondholders pursuant to this chapter, and limiting or abrogating the right of the bondholders to appoint a trustee under this chapter or limiting the rights, powers and duties of the trustee;
      8. Defining the acts or omissions to act which shall constitute a default in the obligations and duties of the financing authority to the holders of the notes or bonds and providing for the rights and remedies of the holders of the notes or bonds in the event of a default, including as a matter of right the appointment of a receiver; provided however, that these rights and remedies shall be consistent with this chapter and the laws of the state of Idaho;
      9. Any other matters, of like or different character, which in any way affect the security or protection of the holders of the notes or bonds.
    3. Any pledge made by the financing authority shall be valid and binding from the time when the pledge is made; the revenues, moneys or property so pledged and thereafter received by the financing agency shall immediately be subject to the lien of the pledge without any physical delivery thereof or further act, and the lien of the pledge shall be valid and binding against all parties having claims of any kind in tort, contract or otherwise against the financing authority, irrespective of whether the parties have notice thereof. Neither the resolution nor any other instrument by which a pledge is created need be recorded.
    4. Neither any administrator of the financing authority nor any other person executing the notes or bonds are subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance thereof.
    5. The financing authority, subject to agreements with noteholders or bondholders as may then exist, shall have power out of any funds available therefor to purchase notes or bonds of the financing authority, which shall thereupon be canceled, at a price not exceeding:
      1. If the notes or bonds are then redeemable, the redemption price, including redemption premium, if any, then applicable plus accrued interest to the next interest payment thereon; or
      2. If the notes or bonds are not then redeemable, the redemption price applicable on the first date after such purchase upon which the notes or bonds become subject to redemption plus accrued interest to such date.
    6. In the discretion of the financing authority, the bonds may be secured by a trust indenture by and between the financing authority and a corporate trustee which may be any trust company or bank having the power of a trust company in the state. The trust indenture may contain provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and remedies of the bondholders as may be reasonable and proper and not in violation of law, including covenants setting forth the duties of the financing authority in relation to the exercise of its corporate powers and the custody, safeguarding and application of all moneys. The financing authority may provide by a trust indenture for the payment of the proceeds of the bonds and the revenues to the trustee under the trust indenture or other depository, and for the method of disbursement thereof, with safeguards and restrictions as it may determine. All expenses incurred in carrying out the trust indenture may be treated as a part of the operating expenses of the financing agency. If the bonds are secured by a trust indenture, the bondholders have no authority to appoint a separate trustee to represent them.
    7. Whether or not the notes and bonds are of a form and character as to be negotiable instruments under the terms of the uniform commercial code, the notes and bonds are hereby made negotiable instruments within the meaning, and for all the purposes, of the uniform commercial code, subject only to the provisions of the notes and bonds for registration.
    8. In case any of the administrators or officers of the financing authority whose signatures appear on any notes or bonds or coupons shall cease to be administrators or officers before the delivery of the notes or bonds, the signatures shall, nevertheless, be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the administrators or officers had remained in office until delivery.
  4. The financing authority may provide for the issuance of refunding obligations for the purpose of refunding any obligations then outstanding which have been issued under the provisions of this chapter, including the advance refunding of obligations as provided by section 57-504, Idaho Code, and including the payment of any redemption premium thereon and any interest accrued or to accrue to the date of redemption of such obligations and for any corporate purpose of the financing authority. The issuance of the obligations, the maturities and other details thereof, the rights of the holders thereof, and the rights, duties and obligations of the financing authority in respect of the same shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter which relate to the issuance of obligations, insofar as such provisions may be appropriate.
  5. Refunding obligations issued as provided in subsection (4) of this section may be sold or exchanged for outstanding obligations issued under this chapter and, if sold, the proceeds thereof may be applied, in addition to any other authorized purposes, to the purchase, redemption or payment of such outstanding obligations. Pending the application of the proceeds of any refunding obligations, with any other available funds, to the payment of the principal, accrued interest and any redemption premium on the obligations being refunded, and, if so provided or permitted in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the refunding obligations or in the trust agreement securing the same, to the payment of any interest on the refunding obligations and any expenses in connection with refunding, the proceeds may be invested in direct obligations of, or obligations the principal of and the interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of America which shall mature or which shall be subject to redemption by the holders thereof, at the option of the holders, not later than the respective dates when the proceeds, together with the interest accruing thereon, will be required for the purposes intended.
  6. All funds of the financing authority except as otherwise authorized or provided in this chapter shall be deposited as soon as practicable in a separate account or accounts in banks or trust companies organized under the laws of the state of Idaho or the national banking association. The moneys in the accounts shall be paid out on checks signed by the chair of the board of administrators or other officers or employees of the financing authority as the administrators authorize. All deposits of the moneys shall, if required by the financing authority, be secured by obligations of the United States of America, of the state or of any municipalities or political subdivisions or agencies of the state at a market value equal at all times to the amount of the deposit, and all banks and trust companies are authorized to give security for the deposits.
  7. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the financing authority may contract with the holders of any of its notes or bonds as to the custody, collection, securing, investment and payment of any moneys of the financing authority and of any moneys held in trust or otherwise for the payment of notes or bonds, and to carry out the contract. Moneys held in trust or otherwise for the payment of notes or bonds or in any way to secure notes or bonds and deposits of the moneys may be secured in the same manner as moneys of the financing authority, and all banks and trust companies are authorized to give security for the deposits.
  8. The financing authority may contract with the holders of bonds or notes with respect to the rights of such holders in the event of a default in the payment of principal or interest on such bonds or notes.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8108, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8109. Notes and bonds — State will not impair vested rights.

The state pledges to and agrees with the holders of any notes or bonds issued under this chapter that the state will not limit or alter the rights hereby vested in the financing authority to fulfill the terms of any agreements made with the holders thereof or in any way impair the rights and remedies of the holders until the notes and bonds, together with the interest thereon, with interest on any unpaid installments of interest, and all costs and expenses in connection with any action or proceeding by or on behalf of the holders, are fully met and discharged. The financing authority may include this pledge and agreement of the state in any agreement with the holders of the notes or bonds.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8109, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8110. Limitation of liability — Notes and bonds are not a debt of the state.

The notes, bonds or other obligations of the financing authority are not an indebtedness or obligation of the state of Idaho, or of any department, board, commission, agency, political subdivision, body corporate and politic, or instrumentality of a municipality or county within the state, nor shall such notes, bonds or obligations of the financing authority constitute the giving or loaning of the credit of the state of Idaho, or of any department, board, commission, agency, political subdivision, body corporate and politic or instrumentality of a municipality or county within the state, nor shall they be payable out of any funds other than those of the financing authority; and the notes and bonds shall contain on the face thereof a statement to that effect.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8110, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8111. State may make grants to financing authority.

The state may make grants of money or property to the financing authority for the purpose of enabling it to carry out its corporate purposes and for the exercise of its powers including, but not limited to, deposits to the reserve funds. This section does not limit any other power the state may have to make grants to the financing authority.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8111, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8112. Notes and bonds of financing authority are legal investments.

The notes and bonds of the financing authority are legal investments in which all public officers and public bodies of this state, its political subdivisions, all municipalities and municipal subdivisions, all insurance companies and associations and other persons carrying on an insurance business, all banks, bankers, banking associations, trust companies, savings banks and savings associations, including savings and loan associations, building and loan associations, investment companies and other persons carrying on a banking business, all administrators, guardians, executors, trustees and other fiduciaries, and all other persons whatsoever who are now or may hereafter be authorized to invest in bonds or in other obligations of the state, may properly and legally invest funds, including capital, in their control or belonging to them. The notes and bonds are also hereby made securities which may properly and legally be deposited with and received by all public officers and bodies of the state or any agency or political subdivision of the state and all municipalities and public corporations for any purpose for which the deposit of bonds or other obligations of the state is authorized by law.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8112, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8113. Notes and bonds of financing authority are tax exempt.

The basin project commission and the financing authority perform essential governmental functions in the exercise of the powers conferred upon them under this chapter. The notes and bonds of the financing authority issued under this chapter, and the income therefrom, including any profit made on the sale thereof, and all its fees, charges, gifts, grants, revenues, receipts, and other moneys received, pledged to pay or secure the payment of the notes or bonds, are exempt from taxation by the state, municipalities and all other political subdivisions of the state. Any property acquired or used by the basin project commission consistent with this chapter are [is] exempt from taxation and assessments.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8113, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertion in the last sentence was added to correct the syntax of the sentence.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8114. Chapter not a limitation of powers.

This chapter does not restrict or limit the powers which the basin project commission or financing authority might otherwise have under any laws of this state, and this chapter is cumulative to those powers. This chapter provides an additional and alternative method for actions authorized and shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to powers conferred by other laws. However, the issuance of bonds, notes and other obligations and refunding bonds under this chapter need not comply with the requirements of any other state law applicable to the issuance of bonds, notes and other obligations. Contracts for the construction and acquisition of any facilities undertaken pursuant to this chapter need not comply with any other state law applicable to contracts for the construction and acquisition of state owned property. No proceedings, notice or approval is required for the issuance of any bonds, notes and other obligations or any instrument as security therefor, except as is provided in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8114, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2001, ch. 371 declared an emergency. Approved April 10, 2001.

§ 39-8115. Inconsistent laws — This chapter controls.

If any provision of this chapter is inconsistent with the provisions of any other law, general, specific or local, the provisions of this chapter control.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8115, as added by 2001, ch. 371, § 2, p. 1295.

Chapter 82 IDAHO SAFE HAVEN ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8201. Title.

This chapter shall be known as the “Idaho Safe Haven Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8101, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 68, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 66, 357 and 371 of S.L. 2001 each purported to enact a new chapter 81 in title 39. Accordingly, ch. 66 was codified as title 39, chapter 83 (§§ [39-8301] 39-8101 to [39-8302] 39-8102), ch. 357 was codified as title 39, ch. 82 (§§ [39-8201] 39-8101 to [39-8207] 39-8107) and ch. 371 was codified as title 39, chapter 81 (§§ 39-8101 to 39-8115). The compiler had inserted bracketed section designations in the enactments by ch. 66 and 357 to indicate the necessary change in numbering from the law as enacted. Those redesignations of the provisions enacted by S.L. 2001, ch. 357 were made permanent by S.L. 2005, ch. 25. The provisions enacted by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 1 were repealed by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 2, effective July 1, 2003.

§ 39-8202. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall mean:

  1. “Custodial parent,” for the purposes of this chapter, means, in the absence of a court decree, the parent with whom the child resides.
  2. “Safe haven” means:
    1. Hospitals licensed in the state of Idaho;
    2. Licensed physicians in the state of Idaho and staff working at their offices and clinics;
    3. Advanced practice professional nurses, including certified nurse-midwives, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners and certified registered nurse anesthetists licensed or registered pursuant to chapter 14, title 54, Idaho Code;
    4. Physician assistants licensed pursuant to chapter 18, title 54, Idaho Code;
    5. Medical personnel acting or serving in the capacity as a licensed provider, affiliated with a recognized Idaho EMS agency. For purposes of this act, “medical personnel” shall include those individuals certified by the department of health and welfare as:
      1. First responders;
      2. Emergency medical technicians — basic;
      3. Advanced emergency medical technicians — ambulance;
      4. Emergency medical technicians — intermediate; and
      5. Emergency medical technicians — paramedic.
    6. A fire station operated by a city, a county, a tribal entity, a fire protection district or a volunteer fire department if there are personnel on duty.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8102, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 69, p. 82; am. 2017, ch. 200, § 1, p. 502.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 200, rewrote the introductory paragraph in paragraph (2)(e), which formerly read: “Medical personnel when making an emergency response to a ‘911’ call from a custodial parent, for the purpose of taking temporary physical custody of a child pursuant to the provisions of this act. For purposes of this act, ‘medical personnel’ shall include those individuals certified by the department of health and welfare as”; and added paragraph (2)(f).

Compiler’s Notes.

The words “this act” in subsection (e) refer to S.L. 2001, ch. 357, § 1 which is compiled as§§ 16-1513, 16-1608, 16-1609, 16-1634, 16-2007, and 39-8201 to 39-8207.

§ 39-8203. Emergency custody of certain abandoned children — Confidentiality — Immunity.

  1. A safe haven shall take temporary physical custody of a child, without court order, if the child is personally delivered to a safe haven, provided that:
    1. The child is no more than thirty (30) days of age;
    2. The custodial parent delivers the child to the safe haven; and
    3. The custodial parent does not express an intent to return for the child.
  2. If a safe haven takes temporary physical custody of a child pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, the safe haven shall:
    1. Perform any act necessary, in accordance with generally accepted standards of professional practice, to protect, preserve, or aid the physical health and safety of the child during the temporary physical custody including, but not limited to, delivering the child to a hospital for care or treatment; and
    2. Immediately notify a peace officer or other person appointed by the court of the abandonment.
  3. The safe haven shall not inquire as to the identity of the custodial parent and, if the identity of a parent is known to the safe haven, the safe haven shall keep all information as to the identity confidential. The custodial parent leaving the child shall not be required to provide any information to the safe haven but may voluntarily provide information including, but not limited to, medical history of the parent(s) or the child.
  4. A safe haven with responsibility for performing duties under this section, and any employee, doctor, or other personnel working at the safe haven, are immune from any civil or criminal liability that otherwise might result from their actions, if they are acting in good faith in receiving a child and performing duties under this section.
  5. A custodial parent may leave a child with a safe haven in this state without being subjected to prosecution for abandonment pursuant to the provisions of title 18, Idaho Code, provided that the child was no more than thirty (30) days of age when it was left at the safe haven, as determined within a reasonable degree of medical certainty.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8103, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 70, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The letter “s” enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-8204. Protective custody — Placement — Immunity.

  1. Upon notification by a safe haven that a child has been abandoned pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, a peace officer or other person appointed by the court shall take protective custody of the child and shall immediately deliver the child to the care, control and custody of the department of health and welfare. Provided however, where the child requires further medical evaluation, care or treatment, the child shall be left in the care of a hospital and the peace officer or other person appointed by the court shall notify the court and prosecutor of the action taken and the location of the child so that a shelter care hearing may be held.
  2. The department of health and welfare shall place an abandoned child with a potential adoptive parent as soon as possible.
  3. A peace officer or other person appointed by the court who takes a child into custody under this section, shall not be held liable either criminally or civilly unless the action of taking the child was exercised in bad faith or in violation of the provisions of this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8104, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 71, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

§ 39-8205. Shelter care hearing — Investigation — Adjudicatory hearing — Termination of parent-child relationship.

  1. A shelter care hearing shall be held pursuant to section 16-1615, Idaho Code, and the department shall file a petition for adjudicatory hearing to vest legal custody in the department pursuant to section 16-1621, Idaho Code, at or prior to the time set for shelter care hearing.
  2. A child protective investigation or criminal investigation shall not be initiated based on a claim of abandonment unless a claim of parental rights is made and the court orders the investigation.
  3. During the initial thirty (30) day period from the time the child was delivered to a safe haven by a custodial parent, the department shall request assistance from law enforcement officials to investigate through the missing children information clearinghouse and other state and national resources to ensure that the child is not a missing child.
  4. An adjudicatory hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 16-1619, Idaho Code, and section 16-1621, Idaho Code.
  5. As soon as practicable following the initial thirty (30) day period from the time the child was delivered to a safe haven by a custodial parent, the department shall petition to terminate the parental rights of the parent who abandoned the child at the safe haven and any unknown parent pursuant to section 16-1624, Idaho Code, and in accordance with chapter 20, title 16, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8105, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 72, p. 82; am. 2005, ch. 391, § 56, p. 1263.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2005 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2005 amendment, by ch. 25, redesignated this section from§ 39-8105.

The 2005 amendment, by ch. 391, also redesignated this section from§ 39-8105 and updated references to the revised chapter 16 of title 16.

§ 39-8206. Claim of parental rights — Procedure.

  1. A parent of the child may make a claim of parental rights of an abandoned child, abandoned pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, by filing a notice of claim of parental rights with the vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare. The vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare shall maintain an abandoned child registry for this purpose which shall be subject to disclosure according to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. The department shall provide forms for the purpose of filing a claim of parental rights, and the forms shall be made available through the vital statistics unit of the Idaho department of health and welfare and in the office of the county clerk in every county of this state. Any parent claiming a parental right of an abandoned child, abandoned pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, shall file the form with the vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare. The form must be filled out completely and provide the name and address for service of the person asserting the parental claim and set forth the approximate date the child was left in a safe haven. The form must be signed by the person claiming the parental right and be witnessed before a notary public. The department shall record the date and time the claim of parental rights is filed with the department. The claim shall be deemed to be duly filed with the department as of the date and time recorded on the claim by the department. To be valid, a claim of parental rights must be filed before an order terminating parental rights is entered by the court. A parent that fails to file a claim of parental rights prior to entry of an order terminating their parental rights is deemed to have abandoned the child and waived and surrendered any right in relation to the child, including the right to notice of any judicial proceeding in connection with the termination of parental rights or adoption of the child. Registration of notice of commencement of paternity proceedings pursuant to chapter 15, title 16, Idaho Code, shall not satisfy the requirements of this section.
  2. Prior to the time set for hearing on the petition to terminate parental rights filed by the department of health and welfare, and prior to entry of an order terminating parental rights by the court, the department of health and welfare shall obtain and file with the court a certificate from the vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare, signed by the state registrar of vital statistics, which certificate shall state that a diligent search has been made of the registry of claims of parental rights of abandoned children, abandoned pursuant to this chapter, and shall set forth the results of that search.
  3. If a claim of parental rights is made before an order terminating parental rights is entered by the court, notice pursuant to section 16-2007, Idaho Code, will be required and the court shall hold the action for involuntary termination of parental rights in abeyance for a period of time not to exceed sixty (60) days unless otherwise ordered by the court. During that period: (a) The court shall order genetic testing to establish maternity or paternity, at the expense of the person or persons claiming the parental right.
  4. If there is no showing that a parent has claimed a parental right to the child, the department of health and welfare shall file with the court a certificate from the vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare, signed by the state registrar of vital statistics, stating that a diligent search has been made of the registry of parental claims for children abandoned pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and that no parental claim has been made. The certificate shall be filed with the court prior to the entrance of the final order of termination of parental rights.

(b) The department of health and welfare shall conduct an investigation pursuant to section 16-2008, Idaho Code, and in those cases where a guardian ad litem has been appointed, the guardian ad litem shall have all rights, powers and duties as provided for in chapter 16, title 16, Idaho Code, and as provided for in chapter 20, title 16, Idaho Code.

(c) When indicated as a result of the investigation, a shelter care hearing shall be conducted by the court in accordance with section 16-1615, Idaho Code, within forty-eight (48) hours, or at an earlier time if ordered by the court, to determine whether the child should remain in the physical custody of the department or be released to a parent or other third party.

(d) Further proceedings shall be conducted as the court determines appropriate. However, where a claim of parental rights is made before an order terminating parental rights is entered by the court, a parent shall not be found to have neglected or abandoned a child placed in accordance with this chapter solely because the child was left with a safe haven.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8106, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 73, p. 82; am. 2005, ch. 391, § 57, p. 1263; am. 2015, ch. 141, § 101, p. 379.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State registrar of vital statistics,§ 39-243.

Amendments.

This section was amended by two 2005 acts which appear to be compatible and have been compiled together.

The 2005 amendment, by ch. 25, redesignated this section from§ 39-8106.

The 2005 amendment, by ch. 391, also redesignated this section from§ 39-8106 and updated references to the revised chapter 16 of title 16.

The 2015 amendment, by ch. 141, substituted “chapter 1, title 74” for “chapter 3, title 9” in the second sentence of subsection (1).

Compiler’s Notes.

The vital statistics unit of the department of health and welfare, referred to in this section, is the bureau of vital records and health statistics. See http://www.healthand welfare.idaho.gov / health / vitalrecordsand healthstatistics/tabid/1504/default.aspx .

§ 39-8207. Report to legislature.

The department of health and welfare shall evaluate the program and shall submit a written report on the program, including recommendations for revisions and improvements, to the senate health and welfare committee and the house of representatives health and welfare committee of the legislature of the state of Idaho no later than two (2) years after the effective date of this act.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8107, as added by 2001, ch. 357, § 1, p. 1252; am. and redesig. 2005, ch. 25, § 74, p. 82.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “effective date of this act”, refers to the effective date of S.L. 2001, ch. 357, which was July 1, 2001.

Chapter 83 GENETIC TESTING PRIVACY ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8301. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Genetic Testing Privacy Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8301, as added by 2006, ch. 293, § 1, p. 903.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 39-8301 and 39-8302, enacted as§§ 39-8101 and 39-8102 by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 1, were repealed by 2001, ch. 66, § 2, effective July 1, 2003.

§ 39-8302. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Blood relative” means a person’s biologically related parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece or first cousin.
  2. “DNA” means deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid and chromosomes which may be analyzed to detect heritable diseases or conditions, including the identification of carriers, predicting risk of disease, or establishing a clinical diagnosis.
  3. “DNA sample” means any human biological specimen from which DNA can be extracted, or DNA extracted from such specimen.
  4. “Employer” means any person, partnership, limited liability company, association, corporation, labor organization, employment agency or nonprofit entity that employs five (5) or more persons including relatives, and including the legislative, executive and judicial branches of state government; any county, city, or any other political subdivision of the state; or any other separate unit of state or local government.
  5. “Genetic analysis” or “genetic test” means the testing or analysis of an identifiable individual’s DNA that results in information that is derived from the presence, absence, alteration or mutation of an inherited gene or genes, or the presence or absence of a specific DNA marker or markers. “Genetic analysis” or “genetic test” does not mean:
    1. A routine physical examination;
    2. A routine chemical, blood or urine analysis;
    3. A test to identify the presence of drugs or HIV infection; or
    4. A test performed due to the presence of signs, symptoms or other manifestations of a disease, illness, impairment or other disorder.
  6. “Individual” means the person from whose body the DNA sample originated.
  7. “Person” means any person, organization or entity other than the individual.
  8. “Private genetic information” means any information about an identifiable individual that is derived from the presence, absence, alteration or mutation of an inherited gene or genes, or the presence or absence of a specific DNA marker or markers, and which has been obtained from a genetic test or analysis of the individual’s DNA or from a genetic test or analysis of a person’s DNA of whom the individual is a blood relative. “Private genetic information” does not include information that is derived from:
    1. A routine physical examination;
    2. A routine chemical, blood or urine analysis;
    3. A test to identify the presence of drugs or HIV infection; or
    4. A test performed due to the presence of signs, symptoms or other manifestations of a disease, illness, impairment or other disorder.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8302, as added by 2006, ch. 293, § 1, p. 903.

STATUTORY NOTES

Prior Laws.

Former§§ 39-8301 and 39-8302, enacted as§§ 39-8101 and 39-8102 by S.L. 2001, ch. 66, § 1, were repealed by 2001, ch. 66, § 2, effective July 1, 2003.

§ 39-8303. Restrictions on employers.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, an employer shall not, in connection with a hiring, promotion, retention or other related decision:
    1. Access or otherwise take into consideration private genetic information about an individual;
    2. Request or require an individual to consent to a release for the purpose of accessing private genetic information about the individual;
    3. Request or require an individual or his blood relative to submit to a genetic test; or
    4. Inquire into the fact that an individual or his blood relative has taken or refused to take a genetic test.
    1. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an employer may seek an order compelling the disclosure of private genetic information held by an individual or third party pursuant to subsection (2)(b) of this section in connection with: (2)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an employer may seek an order compelling the disclosure of private genetic information held by an individual or third party pursuant to subsection (2)(b) of this section in connection with:
      1. An employment-related judicial or administrative proceeding in which the individual has placed his health at issue; or
      2. An employment-related decision in which the employer has a reasonable basis to believe that the individual’s health condition poses a real and unjustifiable safety risk requiring the change or denial of an assignment.
      1. An order compelling the disclosure of private genetic information pursuant to this subsection (2) may only be entered upon a finding that: (b)(i) An order compelling the disclosure of private genetic information pursuant to this subsection (2) may only be entered upon a finding that:
        1. Other ways of obtaining the private information are not available or would not be effective; and
        2. There is a compelling need for the private genetic information which substantially outweighs the potential harm to the privacy interests of the individual.
      2. An order compelling the disclosure of private genetic information pursuant to this subsection (2) shall:
        1. Limit disclosure to those parts of the record containing information essential to fulfill the objective of the order;
        2. Limit disclosure to those persons whose need for the information is the basis of the order; and
        3. Include such other measures as may be necessary to limit disclosure for the protection of the individual.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8303, as added by 2006, ch. 293, § 1, p. 903.

§ 39-8304. Enforcement.

  1. Whenever the attorney general has reason to believe that any employer is engaging, has engaged, or is about to engage in any act in violation of this chapter, the attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state against that employer:
    1. To obtain a declaratory judgment that the act violates the provisions of this chapter;
    2. To enjoin any act that violates the provisions of this chapter by issuance of a temporary restraining order or preliminary or permanent injunction, without bond, upon the giving of appropriate notice;
    3. To recover on behalf of the state and its agencies actual damages or restitution; or
    4. To recover civil penalties of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation and reasonable expenses, investigative costs and attorney’s fees.
  2. The penalties provided in this section are in addition to any other available remedy at law or equity.
  3. Any civil penalty imposed pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the state general fund.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8304, as added by 2006, ch. 293, § 1, p. 903.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Chapter 84 TOBACCO MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COMPLEMENTARY ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8401. Findings and purpose.

The legislature finds that violations of Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act threaten the integrity of Idaho’s master settlement agreement with leading tobacco product manufacturers, the fiscal soundness of the state, and the public health. The legislature finds that enacting procedural enhancements will help prevent violations of Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act and thereby safeguard the master settlement agreement, the fiscal soundness of the state and the public health.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8401, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Tobacco master settlement agreement,§ 39-7801 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 33 and 231 of S.L. 2003 each purported to enact a new chapter 84 in title 39. Accordingly, ch. 33 was codified as title 39, chapter 84 (§§ 39-8401 to 39-8407) and ch. 231 was codified as title 39, chapter 84[85] (§§ 39-8401 [39-8501] to 39-8404 [39-8504]). The chapter enacted by S.L. 2003, ch. 231 was subsequently amended and permanently redesignated as title 39, chapter 85, Idaho Code, by S.L. 2004, ch. 318.

For more on Master Settlement Agreement, see http://www.ag.idaho.gov/tobacco/Master Settlement.html .

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

ALR. — Validity, Construction, Application, and Effect of Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) Between Tobacco Companies and Various States, and State Statutes Implementing Agreement; Use and Distribution of MSA Proceeds. 25 A.L.R.6th 435.

§ 39-8402. Definitions.

  1. “Brand family” means all styles of cigarettes sold under the same trademark and differentiated from one another by means of additional modifiers or descriptors including, but not limited to, “menthol,” “lights,” “kings,” and “100s,” and includes any brand name (alone or in conjunction with any other word), trademark, logo, symbol, motto, selling message, recognizable pattern of colors, or any other indicia of product identification identical or similar to, or identifiable with, a previously known brand of cigarettes.
  2. “Cigarette” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-7802(d), Idaho Code.
  3. “Commission” means the state tax commission for the state of Idaho.
  4. “Master settlement agreement” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-7802(e), Idaho Code.
  5. “Nonparticipating manufacturer” means any tobacco product manufacturer that is not a participating manufacturer.
  6. “Participating manufacturer” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section II(jj) of the master settlement agreement and all amendments thereto.
  7. “Qualified escrow fund” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-7802(f), Idaho Code.
  8. “Stamping agent” means a person who is authorized to wholesale cigarettes or is required to affix tax stamps to packages or other containers of cigarettes as well as any person who pays a tobacco products tax on “roll your own” tobacco, pursuant to chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code.
  9. “Tobacco product manufacturer” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-7802(i), Idaho Code.
  10. “Units sold” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-7802(j), Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8402, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145; am. 2006, ch. 74, § 1, p. 227.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2006 amendment, by ch. 74, in subsection (8), substituted “to wholesale cigarettes or is required” for “or required” and “as well as any person who pays a tobacco products tax on ‘roll your own’ tobacco, pursuant to” for “under.”

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

CASE NOTES

Cited

State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109 (2010).

§ 39-8403. Certifications — Directory — Tax stamps.

  1. Every tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this state whether directly or through a wholesaler, distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries shall execute and deliver on a form prescribed by the attorney general a certification to the attorney general no later than the thirtieth day of April each year, certifying, under penalty of perjury, that, as of the date of such certification, such tobacco product manufacturer is either: a participating manufacturer; or in full compliance with section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, including all quarterly installment payments required by section 39-8405(5), Idaho Code.
    1. A participating manufacturer shall include in its certification a list of its brand families. The participating manufacturer shall update such list thirty (30) days prior to any addition to or modification of its brand families by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the attorney general.
    2. A nonparticipating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of all of its brand families that were sold in the state at any time during the preceding calendar year, or that have been sold in the state at any time during the current calendar year, and shall:
      1. List, for each brand family, the number of units sold in the state during the preceding calendar year;
      2. Note, by means of an asterisk, any brand family sold in the state during the preceding calendar year that is no longer being sold in the state as of the date of such certification;
      3. Identify by name and address any other manufacturer of such brand families in the preceding calendar year or the current calendar year. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall update such list thirty (30) days prior to any addition to or modification of its brand families by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the attorney general;
    3. In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, such certification shall further certify:
      1. That such nonparticipating manufacturer is registered to do business in the state or has appointed an agent for service of process and provided notice thereof as required by section 39-8404, Idaho Code;
      2. That such nonparticipating manufacturer has:
        1. Established and continues to maintain a qualified escrow fund;
        2. Executed a qualified escrow agreement that has been reviewed and approved by the attorney general and that governs the qualified escrow fund;
        3. The amount such nonparticipating manufacturer placed in such fund for cigarettes sold in the state during the preceding calendar year, the date and amount of each such deposit, and such evidence or verification as may be deemed necessary by the attorney general to confirm the foregoing; 4. The amount and date of any withdrawal or transfer of funds the nonparticipating manufacturer made at any time from such fund or from any other qualified escrow fund into which it ever made escrow payments pursuant to section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, and all rules promulgated thereto.
      3. That such nonparticipating manufacturer is in full compliance with section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, and this section, and any rules promulgated pursuant thereto.
      4. 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the financial institution where the nonparticipating manufacturer has established such qualified escrow fund required pursuant to section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, and all rules promulgated thereto;
    4. A tobacco product manufacturer may not include a brand family in its certification unless:
      1. In the case of a participating manufacturer, said participating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of calculating its payments under the master settlement agreement for the relevant year, in the volume and shares determined pursuant to the master settlement agreement; and
      2. In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, said nonparticipating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code. Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the state’s right to maintain that a brand family constitutes cigarettes of a different tobacco product manufacturer for purposes of calculating payments under the master settlement agreement or for purposes of section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code.
    5. Tobacco product manufacturers shall maintain all invoices and documentation of sales and other such information relied upon for such certification for a period of five (5) years, unless otherwise required by law to maintain them for a greater period of time.
  2. Not later than September 30, 2003, the attorney general shall develop and publish on his website a directory listing all tobacco product manufacturers that have provided current and accurate certifications conforming to the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, and all brand families that are listed in such certifications, except as noted below.
    1. The attorney general shall not include or retain in such directory the name or brand families of any nonparticipating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or whose certification the attorney general determines is not in compliance with subsections (1)(b) and (c) of this section, unless the attorney general has determined that such violation has been cured to the satisfaction of the attorney general.
    2. Neither a tobacco product manufacturer nor a brand family shall be included or retained in the directory if the attorney general concludes in the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer that:
      1. Any escrow payment required pursuant to section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, for any period and for any brand family, whether or not listed by such nonparticipating manufacturer, has not been fully paid into a qualified escrow fund governed by a qualified escrow agreement that has been approved by the attorney general; or
      2. Any outstanding final judgment, including interest thereon, for a violation of Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act has not been fully satisfied for such brand family and such manufacturer.
    3. The attorney general shall update the directory as necessary in order to correct mistakes and to add or remove a tobacco product manufacturer or brand families to keep the directory in conformity with the requirements of this chapter. The attorney general shall transmit by electronic mail, if possible, or by other means as are reasonable to each stamping agent, notice of the addition to, or removal from, the directory of any tobacco product manufacturer or brand family. (d) Every stamping agent shall provide and update as necessary a mailing address and, where available, an electronic mail address to the attorney general for the purpose of receiving any notifications as may be required by this chapter.
  3. It shall be unlawful for any person:
    1. To affix a stamp to a package or other container of cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer or brand family not included in the directory;
    2. To sell, offer or possess for sale in this state, cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer or brand family not included in the directory;
    3. To acquire, hold, own, possess, transport, import, or cause to be imported cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended for distribution or sale in the state in violation of this subsection (3).
  4. Nothing in this chapter shall excuse payment of cigarette taxes under chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code, by any person in regard to any package or other container of cigarettes not included in the directory but sold by that person.
  5. The attorney general may condition certification of a nonparticipating tobacco product manufacturer upon obtaining from the manufacturer its consent to be sued in Idaho district court for purposes of the state of Idaho enforcing any provisions of chapter 78 or 84, title 39, Idaho Code, or for the state bringing a released claim as that term is defined by subsection (g) of section 39-7802, Idaho Code.

2. The account number of such qualified escrow fund and any subaccount number for the state of Idaho;

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8403, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145; am. 2005, ch. 40, § 1, p. 160.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

For current directory of compliant tobacco product manufacturers and brand families, see http://www.ag.idaho.gov/tobacco/directory main.html .

CASE NOTES

Federal Preemption.

State’s lawsuit against a company owned by a Native American for violations of this section and§ 63-2503 was not subject to complete preemption by federal law because the state has authority to impose taxes on cigarette sales between tribe members and nonmembers. Idaho v. Native Wholesale Supply Co., Case No. 08-CV-396-S-EJL, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28688 (D. Idaho Apr. 6, 2009).

Interstate Commerce.

State has subject matter jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this chapter and to prevent non-compliant cigarettes from being imported into Idaho because a Native American retailer’s importation of non-compliant cigarettes into Idaho was an off-reservation activity, and the retailer’s activities were not limited to reservations. State v. Native Wholesale Supply Co., 155 Idaho 337, 312 P.3d 1257 (2013). Interstate Commerce.

This section clearly prohibits selling, or offering for sale, noncompliant cigarettes, in Idaho. It does not facially discriminate against interstate commerce, but prohibits both intrastate and interstate parties from selling, or offering for sale, such cigarettes. State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109, cert. denied, 562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 150, 178 L. Ed. 2d 37 (2010).

§ 39-8404. Agent for service of process.

  1. Any nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer that has not registered to do business in this state as a foreign corporation or business entity shall, as a condition precedent to having its brand families listed or retained in the directory, appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in this state to act as agent for the service of process on whom all process, and any action or proceeding against it concerning or arising out of the enforcement of this chapter and Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act, may be served in any manner authorized by law. Such service shall constitute legal and valid service of process on the nonparticipating manufacturer. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide the name, address, phone number and proof of the appointment and availability of such agent to, and to the satisfaction of, the attorney general.
  2. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide notice to the attorney general thirty (30) calendar days prior to termination of the authority of an agent and shall further provide proof to the satisfaction of the attorney general of the appointment of a new agent no less than five (5) calendar days prior to the termination of an existing agent appointment. In the event an agent terminates an agency appointment, the nonparticipating manufacturer shall notify the attorney general of said termination within five (5) calendar days and shall include proof to the satisfaction of the attorney general of the appointment of a new agent.
  3. Any nonparticipating manufacturer whose products are sold in this state, without appointing or designating an agent as herein required, shall be deemed to have appointed the secretary of state as such agent and may be proceeded against in courts of this state by service of process upon the secretary of state; however, the appointment of the secretary of state as such agent shall not satisfy the condition precedent to having its brand families listed or retained in the directory.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8404, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Secretary of state,§ 67-901 et seq.

Tobacco master settlement agreement,§ 39-7801 et seq.

§ 39-8405. Reporting of information — Escrow installments.

  1. Not later than twenty (20) calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter, and more frequently if so directed by the attorney general, each stamping agent shall submit such information as the attorney general requires to facilitate compliance with this chapter including, but not limited to, a list by brand family of the total number of cigarettes for which the stamping agent affixed stamps during the previous calendar quarter or otherwise paid the tax due for such cigarettes. The stamping agent shall maintain, and make available to the attorney general, all invoices and documentation of sales of all nonparticipating manufacturer cigarettes and any other information relied upon in reporting to the attorney general for a period of five (5) years.
  2. The commission is authorized to disclose to the attorney general any information received under this chapter or Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act and requested by the attorney general for purposes of determining compliance with and enforcing the provisions of this chapter. The commission and attorney general shall share with each other the information received under this chapter or chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code, and may share such information with other federal, state or local agencies only for purposes of enforcement of this chapter, Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act, or corresponding laws of other states.
  3. The attorney general may require at any time from the nonparticipating manufacturer proof, from the financial institution in which such manufacturer has established a qualified escrow fund for the purpose of compliance with Idaho’s tobacco master settlement agreement act, of the amount of money in such fund, exclusive of interest, and the amount and date of each deposit to the fund, and the amount and date of each withdrawal from the fund.
  4. In addition to the information required to be submitted pursuant to this chapter, the attorney general may require a stamping agent or tobacco product manufacturer to submit any additional information including, but not limited to, samples of the packaging or labeling of each brand family, as is necessary to enable the attorney general to determine whether a tobacco product manufacturer or stamping agent is in compliance with this chapter.
  5. To promote compliance with the provisions of this chapter, the attorney general may promulgate rules requiring a tobacco product manufacturer subject to the requirements of section 39-7803(b), Idaho Code, to make the escrow deposits required in quarterly installments during the year in which the sales covered by such deposits are made. The attorney general may require production of information sufficient to enable the attorney general to determine the adequacy of the amount of the installment deposit.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8405, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Tobacco master settlement agreement,§ 39-7801 et seq.

§ 39-8406. Penalties and other remedies.

  1. Each stamp affixed, each sale or offer to sell, and each cigarette possessed in violation of section 39-8403(3), Idaho Code, shall constitute a separate violation. For each violation hereof, the district court may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of five hundred percent (500%) of the retail value of the cigarettes or five thousand dollars ($5,000) upon a determination of violation of section 39-8403(3), Idaho Code, or any rule adopted pursuant thereto.
  2. In addition to or in lieu of any other civil or criminal remedy provided by law, upon a determination that a stamping agent has violated section 39-8403(3), Idaho Code, or any rule adopted pursuant thereto, the commission may revoke or suspend the license of any stamping agent in the manner provided by law.
  3. Any cigarettes that have had stamps affixed, been sold, offered for sale or possessed for sale in this state in violation of section 39-8403(3) shall be deemed contraband under section 63-2513, Idaho Code, and such cigarettes shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture by the commission as provided in such section, and all such cigarettes so seized and forfeited shall be destroyed and not resold.
  4. The attorney general may seek an injunction to prevent or restrain a threatened or actual violation of section 39-8403(3), 39-8405(1) or 39-8405(4), Idaho Code, by a stamping agent and to compel the stamping agent to comply with such subsections.
  5. A person who violates section 39-8403(3), Idaho Code, engages in an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of the Idaho consumer protection act, chapter 6, title 48, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8406, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145.

§ 39-8407. Miscellaneous provisions.

  1. A determination of the attorney general to exclude or remove from the directory a brand family or tobacco product manufacturer shall be subject to review in the manner prescribed by Idaho’s administrative procedure act.
  2. No person shall be issued a license or granted a renewal of a license to act as a stamping agent unless such person has certified, in writing, that such person will comply fully with this chapter.
  3. For the year 2003, the first report of stamping agents required by section 39-8405(1), Idaho Code, shall be due thirty (30) calendar days after the effective date of this chapter; the certifications by a tobacco product manufacturer described in section 39-8403(1), Idaho Code, shall be due forty-five (45) days after such effective date; and the directory described in section 39-8403(2), Idaho Code, shall be published or made available within ninety (90) calendar days after such effective date.
  4. The commission and the attorney general may promulgate rules necessary to effect the purposes of this chapter.
  5. In any action brought by the attorney general to enforce this chapter, the attorney general shall be entitled to recover the costs of investigation, expert witness fees, costs of the action and reasonable attorney’s fees.
  6. If a court determines that a person has violated this chapter, the court shall order any profits, gain, gross receipts or other benefit from the violation to be disgorged and paid to the state treasurer for deposit in the general fund. Unless otherwise expressly provided the remedies or penalties provided by this chapter are cumulative to each other and to the remedies or penalties available under all other laws of this state.
  7. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the provisions of this chapter and of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement act conflict and cannot be harmonized, then such provisions of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement act, chapter 78, title 39, Idaho Code, shall control. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter causes the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement act to no longer constitute a qualifying or model statute, as those terms are defined in the master settlement agreement, then that portion of this chapter shall not be valid. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or any part thereof.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8407, as added by 2003, ch. 33, § 2, p. 145.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Administrative procedure act,§ 67-5201 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this chapter,” and similar phrases, in subsection (3) refers to the effective date of S.L. 2003, ch. 33, which was July 1, 2003.

CASE NOTES

Attorney Fees.

When the state sued an online proprietor who sold noncompliant cigarettes to Idaho consumers without a permit in violation of this chapter, the district court properly awarded the state summary judgment and attorney fees. Subsection (5) of this section applies and is interpreted to permit the attorney general to recover attorney fees when the attorney general is the prevailing party. State v. Maybee, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109, cert. denied, 562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 150, 178 L. Ed. 2d 37 (2010).

§ 39-8408 — 39-8419. [Reserved.]

  1. The legislature finds that the commercial use of cigarette rolling machines in this state has the potential to circumvent various requirements under Idaho law related to the manufacturing, marketing, sale and taxation of cigarettes. Such use is to the detriment of the fiscal soundness of the state and the public health.
  2. This legislation is intended to ensure that cigarette rolling machine operators comply with applicable Idaho laws governing the manufacturing, marketing, sale and taxation of cigarettes and that the use of such cigarette rolling machines will not circumvent these laws and undercut the purposes for which they were enacted.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8420, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 1, p. 548.

§ 39-8421. Definitions.

As used in sections 39-8420 through 39-8425, Idaho Code:

  1. The definitions set forth in section 39-8402, Idaho Code, of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement complementary act, and in this section, apply to sections 39-8420 through 39-8425, Idaho Code.
  2. “Cigarette rolling machine” means any machine or device that has the capability to produce at least one hundred fifty (150) cigarettes in less than thirty (30) minutes.
  3. “Cigarette rolling machine operator” means any person who owns or leases or otherwise has available for use a cigarette rolling machine and makes such a machine available for use by another person in a commercial setting in order to manufacture a cigarette. No person shall be deemed a cigarette rolling machine operator based solely upon that person’s manufacture, sale, enabling, disabling, or repair of a cigarette rolling machine.
  4. “Minor” has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-5702(6), Idaho Code.
  5. “Person” means natural persons, corporations both foreign and domestic, trusts, partnerships both limited and general, incorporated or unincorporated associations, companies, business entities, and any other legal entity, or any other group associated in fact although not a legal entity.
  6. “Tobacco products” means any substance that contains tobacco, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, snuff, smoking tobacco, tobacco papers, or smokeless tobacco.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8421, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 2, p. 548; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 18, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, deleted “of the Idaho prevention of minor’s access to tobacco act” at the end of subsection (4); and rewrote subsection (6), which formerly read: “’Tobacco products’ has the same meaning as that term is defined in section 39-5702(13), Idaho Code, of the Idaho prevention of minors’ access to tobacco act.”

§ 39-8422. Certification of cigarette rolling machine operators.

A cigarette rolling machine operator may not locate at, offer, or make a cigarette rolling machine available for use, or offer for sale cigarettes manufactured by the operator or any other person at the location of the operator’s cigarette rolling machine, until the operator has first been certified by the attorney general upon a form prescribed by the attorney general. The attorney general shall annually certify a cigarette rolling machine operator, but only after he has obtained adequate certification from the operator, as set forth in section 39-8423, Idaho Code, and has been provided by the operator sufficient information identifying the operator, the location, the make and brand of the operator’s cigarette rolling machine, and the person(s) from whom the operator will purchase its tobacco for purposes of the operator’s cigarette rolling machine’s manufacturing of cigarettes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8422, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 3, p. 548.

§ 39-8423. Requirements for certification.

  1. Before a cigarette rolling machine operator may be certified by the attorney general, the operator shall certify, under penalty of perjury, that:
    1. All tobacco to be used in the operator’s cigarette rolling machine, regardless of the tobacco’s label or description thereof, will only be of a brand family and of a tobacco product manufacturer listed on the directory maintained by the attorney general pursuant to section 39-8403, Idaho Code, of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement complementary act;
    2. All applicable state tobacco taxes have been paid, as required by the cigarette and tobacco products tax act, chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code, for the tobacco to be used in the operator’s cigarette rolling machine;
    3. The operator has obtained, and has a current permit issued, pursuant to section 39-5704, Idaho Code;
    4. All cigarette tubes used in the operator’s cigarette rolling machine shall be constructed of paper of a type determined by the attorney general, pursuant to regulations to be promulgated by the attorney general, to reduce the likely ignition propensity of cigarettes to be made with such tubes;
      1. At any location where the operator has a cigarette rolling machine, seventy-five percent (75%) of the revenues of the operator’s total merchandise sales at that location are comprised of tobacco products; or (e)(i) At any location where the operator has a cigarette rolling machine, seventy-five percent (75%) of the revenues of the operator’s total merchandise sales at that location are comprised of tobacco products; or
      2. The location where the cigarette rolling machine is situated prohibits minors from entering the premises;
    5. The operator will not sell cigarettes or make a cigarette rolling machine available for use, in any quantity less than twenty (20) cigarettes per transaction, except for samples prepared in connection with the purchase or prospective purchase of tobacco and consumed or destroyed at the premises where the cigarette rolling machine is located; and
    6. The operator will not accept or allow its cigarette rolling machine to be used to manufacture cigarettes with tobacco that was not first purchased or obtained from the operator and for which the operator will timely and properly report to the attorney general as set forth in subsection (2) of this section.
  2. After being certified, the cigarette rolling machine operator shall annually certify, under penalty of perjury, to the provisions set forth in subsection (1) of this section. Additionally, the operator shall quarterly report to the attorney general on a form prescribed by the attorney general:
    1. The number of cigarettes that the operator’s cigarette rolling machine manufactured during that quarter;
    2. The brand families, the tobacco product manufacturer of each brand family, and the ounces of tobacco of each such brand family that were used in the operator’s cigarette rolling machine to manufacture cigarettes during the quarter; and
    3. The person or persons from whom the operator purchased or obtained the tobacco that the operator’s machine used to manufacture cigarettes.
  3. The cigarette rolling machine operator’s annual certification shall be due to the attorney general no later than the thirtieth day of April each year.
  4. All tobacco certified under subsection (1)(a) of this section shall be deemed to be “roll-your-own” tobacco for purposes of section 39-7802(d), Idaho Code, of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement act. (5) A cigarette rolling machine operator shall not be required to comply with the provisions of subsection (1)(d) of this section until the attorney general has promulgated rules implementing this subsection, pursuant to section 39-8425, Idaho Code, and the effective date provided for such rules has passed.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8423, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 4, p. 548; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 19, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, deleted “of the Idaho prevention of minors’ access to tobacco act” at the end of paragraph (1)(c) and substituted “subsection (1)(d) of this section” for “section 39-8423(1)(d), Idaho Code” near the beginning of subsection (5).

§ 39-8424. Violations — Attorney general and district court authority — Revocation of certification.

  1. Any person who violates any provision of this act, or any certification provided by the attorney general, is subject to the imposition of a civil penalty by the district court in the amount set forth in section 39-8406(1), Idaho Code. The attorney general and the district courts shall have the same authority in enforcing and carrying out the provisions of this section as is granted the attorney general and district courts under sections 39-8406 and 39-8407, Idaho Code, of the Idaho tobacco master settlement agreement complementary act.
  2. In addition to the authority set forth in subsection (1) of this section:
    1. The district court shall have the authority to revoke the cigarette rolling machine operator’s permit issued by the department of health and welfare, pursuant to chapter 57, title 39, Idaho Code, for a period of at least three (3) months but up to one (1) year.
      1. The attorney general may suspend or revoke a cigarette rolling machine operator’s certification for violation of any provisions of this act or the operator’s certification or any rule adopted by the attorney general pursuant to this act. (b)(i) The attorney general may suspend or revoke a cigarette rolling machine operator’s certification for violation of any provisions of this act or the operator’s certification or any rule adopted by the attorney general pursuant to this act.
      2. A determination by the attorney general to deny a certification application or to suspend or revoke a cigarette rolling machine operator’s certification shall be subject to review in the manner prescribed by Idaho’s administrative procedure act, chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. In instances where a certification is suspended or revoked, the cigarette rolling machine operator may not thereafter use or make the machine available for use and shall have ten (10) days after receiving actual notice that its certification has been suspended or revoked to remove the machine from the operator’s commercial premises. If the operator fails to remove the cigarette rolling machine within this time period, the machine shall be deemed contraband and subject to seizure and forfeiture. During the period in which the operator’s certification has been suspended or revoked, the operator may store the machine at a storage site as long as the machine is not used by or available to persons for use to manufacture cigarettes.
  3. No person who manufactures a cigarette using a cigarette rolling machine shall sell or offer that cigarette for sale in this state. This prohibition shall not apply to any person holding a federal license as a cigarette manufacturer.
  4. Unless expressly provided, the remedies or penalties provided by this act are cumulative to each other and to the remedies or penalties available under all other laws of this state.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8424, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 5, p. 548; am. 2020, ch. 318, § 20, p. 905.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.
Compiler’s Notes.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 318, in subsection (2), in paragraph (a), deleted “tobacco” preceding “permit issued” near the beginning and substituted “chapter 57, title 39, Idaho Code” for “the Idaho prevention of minors’ access to tobacco act.” Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” near the beginning of subsection (1) refers to S.L. 2012, Chapter 206, which is codified as§§ 39-8420 to 39-8425.

§ 39-8425. Rulemaking.

The attorney general may adopt rules to implement this act. With respect to section 39-8423(1)(d), Idaho Code, the attorney general shall adopt rules with an effective date that is no earlier than July 1, 2013. In adopting rules implementing subsection 39-8423(1)(d), Idaho Code, the attorney general may provide for an effective date that is later than July 2, 2013, if, in his discretion, such later effective date is warranted.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8425, as added by 2012, ch. 206, § 6, p. 548.

§ 39-8420. Legislative findings and intent.

Chapter 85 LAKE PEND OREILLE, PEND OREILLE RIVER, PRIEST LAKE AND PRIEST RIVER COMMISSION

Sec.

§ 39-8501. Creation of Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission.

There is hereby created in the area in and around Bonner county, the Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8401, as added by 2003, ch. 231, § 1, p. 590; am. and redesig. 2004, ch. 318, § 7, p. 892.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Chapters 33 and 231 of S.L. 2003 each purported to enact a new chapter 84 in title 39. Accordingly, ch. 33 was codified as title 39, chapter 84 (§§ 39-8401 to 39-8407) and ch. 231 was codified as title 39, chapter 84[85] (§§ 39-8401 [39-8501] to 39-8404 [39-8504]). The chapter enacted by S.L. 2003, ch. 231 was amended and permanently redesignated as title 39, chapter 85, Idaho Code, by S.L. 2004, ch. 318.

For more on the Pend Oreille basin commission, see http://lakescommission.com

Effective Dates.

Section 14 of S.L. 2004, ch. 318 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 2004.

§ 39-8502. Membership.

The commission shall consist of seven (7) members as follows: a chairman and four (4) members who may be residents of the county of Bonner and shall be selected by the governor; the regional director of the United States fish and wildlife service; and the attorney general of the state of Idaho or the attorney general’s designee. The governor of the state of Montana or the Montana governor’s designee shall be an ex officio member of the commission. The terms of the members shall be three (3) years with the initial term to be staggered in terms of one (1), two (2) and three (3) years by the governor when he makes the appointment. A majority of the commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The chairman and the four (4) members appointed by the governor shall be confirmed by the senate. Members shall be compensated as provided in section 59-509(b), Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8402, as added by 2003, ch. 231, § 1, p. 590; am. and redesig. 2004, ch. 318, § 8, p. 892.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 14 of S.L. 2004, ch. 318 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 2004.

§ 39-8503. Duties of the commission.

  1. The Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission shall have:
    1. The duty to study, investigate and select ways and means of controlling the water quality and water quantity as they relate to waters of Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River for the communities’ interests and interests of the state of Idaho and for the survival of the native species of fish contiguous to the Pend Oreille Priest Basin. Those species are bull trout, westslope cutthroat, mountain white fish, pike minnow and the forage base for bull trout and kokanee salmon;
    2. The authority to study, investigate, develop and select strategies with the department of water resources, the department of environmental quality, the department of fish and game, the department of lands, the United States fish and wildlife service, and the U.S. army corps of engineers for the preservation of the said species of native fish, scenic beauty, health, recreation, transportation and commercial purposes necessary and desirable for all the inhabitants of the state;
    3. The authority to receive and direct any mitigation moneys into the Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission fund created in section 39-8504, Idaho Code; and
    4. The authority to designate one (1) or more representatives to participate in proceedings relating to the Columbia River Basin, including but not limited to those of the Albeni Falls mitigation work group, the technical management team and other proceedings regarding federal Columbia River power system operations, the Columbia River treaty, and the Idaho invasive species council.
  2. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the commission to establish or require minimum stream flows or lake levels, which may only be established under the provisions of chapter 15, title 42, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8403, as added by 2003, ch. 231, § 1, p. 590; am. and redesig. 2004, ch. 318, § 9, p. 892; am. 2018, ch. 63, § 1, p. 154.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Department of environmental quality,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Department of fish and game,§ 36-101 et seq.

Department of lands,§ 58-101 et seq.

Department of water resources,§ 42-1701 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 63, divided and designated the existing provisions of subsection (1) as paragraphs (a) through (c) and added paragraph (1)(d).

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the Pend Oreille basin commission, see http://lakescommission.com

Effective Dates.

Section 14 of S.L. 2004, ch. 318 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 2004.

Section 3 of S.L. 2018, ch. 60 declared an emergency. Approved March 13, 2018.

§ 39-8504. Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission fund established.

There is hereby created in the state treasury the Lake Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille River, Priest Lake and Priest River commission fund. Moneys in the fund may consist of appropriations, federal funds, mitigation moneys, donations or moneys of any source. Moneys in the fund may be dispersed for necessary corrective actions to complete the corrective measures as they pertain to duties of the commission created under this chapter. The release of any mitigation funds from the fund shall be authorized by the state board of examiners. Moneys in the fund may also be used to pay the administrative costs of the commission and to provide for participation in proceedings relating to the Columbia River Basin, as authorized under the provisions of section 39-8503, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8404, as added by 2003, ch. 231, § 1, p. 590; am. and redesig. 2004, ch. 318, § 10, p. 892; am. 2018, ch. 63, § 2, p. 154.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of examiners,§ 67-2001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2018 amendment, by ch. 63, added “and to provide for participation in proceedings relating to the Columbia River Basin, as authorized under the provisions of section 39-8503, Idaho Code” at the end of the section.

Effective Dates.

Section 14 of S.L. 2004, ch. 318 declared an emergency. Approved March 24, 2004.

Section 3 of S.L. 2018, ch. 63 declared an emergency. Approved March 13, 2018.

Chapter 86 IDAHO ELEVATOR SAFETY CODE ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8601. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Elevator Safety Code Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8601, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8602. Legislative findings and intent.

  1. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for safety of life and limb and to ensure that the safe design, mechanical and electrical operation, erection, installation, alteration, maintenance, inspection and repair of elevators, escalators, moving walks, platform lifts, material lifts, and dumbwaiters, and all such operation, erection, installation, alteration, maintenance, inspection and repair subject to the provisions of this chapter shall be reasonably safe to persons and property and in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. The use of unsafe and defective lifting devices imposes a substantial probability of serious and preventable injury to employees and the public exposed to unsafe conditions. The prevention of these injuries and the protection of employees and the public from unsafe conditions is in the best interest of the people of this state. Personnel performing work covered by this chapter must, by documented training or experience or both, be familiar with the operation and safety functions of the components and equipment and be licensed in accordance with this chapter. Training and experience shall include, but are not limited to, recognizing the safety hazards and performing the procedures to which they are assigned in conformance with the requirements of this chapter. This chapter establishes the minimum acceptable standards for personnel performing all inspections required in this chapter.
  2. This chapter is not intended to prevent the use of systems, methods or devices of equivalent or superior quality, strength, fire resistance, code effectiveness, durability and safety to those required by this chapter, provided that there is technical documentation to demonstrate the equivalency of the system, method or device, as prescribed in this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8602, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8603. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the terms defined in this section shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

  1. “Administrator” means the administrator of the division of building safety for the state of Idaho.
  2. “ANSI” means the American national standards institute.
  3. “ASME” means the American society of mechanical engineers.
  4. “Conveyance” includes elevators, escalators, moving walks, platform lifts, material lifts, and dumbwaiters.
  5. “Division” means the Idaho division of building safety.
  6. “Dumbwaiter” means a hoisting and lowering mechanism equipped with a car of limited size that is used exclusively for carrying materials and that moves in guide rails and serves two (2) or more landings.
  7. “Elevator” means a hoisting or lowering machine equipped with a car or platform that moves in guides and services two (2) or more floors or landings of a building or structure.
  8. “Escalator” means a power-driven, inclined, continuous stairway used for raising and lowering passengers.
  9. “Installation” means a complete conveyance including any hoistway, hoistway enclosures and related construction and all machinery and equipment for its operation.
    1. “Existing installation” means an installation that has been completed or upon which construction was commenced prior to July 1, 2004.
    2. “New installation” means any installation not classified as an existing installation by definition, or an existing conveyance moved to a new location subsequent to July 1, 2004.
  10. “Maintenance” means a process of routine examination, lubrication, cleaning, adjustment, and replacement of parts for the performance in accordance with applicable code requirements.
  11. “Major alteration” means any change to equipment or other maintenance, repair or replacement where work is defined by any applicable code requirement.
  12. “Material lift” means a hoisting and lowering mechanism normally classified as an elevator, equipped with a car that moves within a guide system installed at an angle of greater than seventy degrees (70/d) from the horizontal, serving two (2) or more landings, for the purpose of transporting materials that are manually or automatically loaded or unloaded.
  13. “Modernization” means the replacing or upgrading of any major operating component(s) of a conveyance.
  14. “Moving walks” means a type of passenger-carrying device on which passengers stand or walk and in which the passenger-carrying surface remains parallel to its direction of motion and is uninterrupted.
  15. “Owner” includes the designated agent or representative of the owner.
  16. “Platform lift” means a hoisting and lowering mechanism that moves within a guide system and serves two (2) or more landings and may include vertical or inclined platform lifts used by persons who are mobility impaired.
  17. “Private residence” means a separate dwelling or a separate apartment in a multiple dwelling occupied only by the members of a single family unit. (18) “Qualified elevator inspector” or “QEI” means a person who is currently certified by the National Association of Elevator Safety Authorities International (NAESA International) accredited certifying organization as meeting the requirements of the ASME QEI-1 Standard for the Qualification of Elevator Inspectors and who is employed by or under contract to the division of building safety.

(19) “Repair” means the process of rehabilitation, upgrading or replacement of parts that are basically the same as the originals for the purpose of ensuring performance in accordance with the applicable code requirements.

(20) “Replacement” means the substitution of a device or component in its entirety with a new unit that is basically the same as the original for the purpose of ensuring performance in accordance with the applicable code requirements.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8603, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2020, ch. 99, § 1, p. 258.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

Amendments.

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 99, substituted “ASME QEI-1 Standard for the Qualification of Elevator Inspectors” for “NAESA International QEI-1 standard” near the end of subsection (18).

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the American national standards institute, referred to in subsection (2), see http://ansi.org .

For more on the American society of mechanical engineers, referred to in subsection (3), see http://www.asme.org .

For more on NAESA International, referred to in subsection (18), see http://naesai.org .

For more on ASME QEI-1, Standard for the Qualification of Elevator Inspectors, referred to in subsection (18), see https://webstore.ansi.org/Standards/ASME/ASMEQEI2018 .

§ 39-8604. Enforcement.

The administrator shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. Local governments shall not adopt codes or institute enforcement programs with regard to conveyances.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8604, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8605. Administrator’s rulemaking authority.

The administrator may adopt rules and codes governing the operation, installation, alteration, maintenance, inspection and repair of conveyances and shall adopt minimum standards governing existing installations. The administrator may adopt such rules and fees as are reasonably necessary to establish and administer the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8605, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8606. Scope — Exemptions.

  1. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all conveyances within the state of Idaho except the following or as provided in subsection (b) of this section:
    1. Conveyances located in private residences;
    2. Conveyances in federally owned facilities;
    3. Conveyances permanently removed from service or made effectively inoperative; and
    4. Conveyances erected temporarily for use only during construction work that are of such a design that they must be operated by a workman stationed at the hoisting machine.
  2. Conveyances erected before July 1, 2004, pursuant to section 39-8614(3), Idaho Code, are subject only to the requirements of the safety code for existing elevators and escalators (ASME A17.3). Such conveyances, however, shall also be exempted from any requirements of that ASME A17.3 requiring conveyances to be modified with upgrades or replacements that would fall within the definition of “modernization” as defined in section 39-8603, Idaho Code, or to be modified with additional safety features falling within the definition of “alteration” unless:
    1. The total cost of the modification is less than five thousand dollars ($5,000); or
    2. The conveyance is not situated in a privately owned business facility; or
    3. The facility in which the conveyance is located is being altered, as defined within the provisions and guidelines applicable to the Americans with disabilities act of 1990 and amendments thereto, provided that said alterations are significant in that they affect the accessibility of the majority of floor space on at least one (1) floor of the building.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8606, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2012, ch. 42, § 1, p. 130.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2012 amendment, by ch. 42, added the subsection (a) designation to the existing provisions; inserted “or as provided in subsection (b) of this section” at the end of the introductory paragraph in subsection (a); and added subsection (b).

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2012, ch. 42, declared an emergency. Approved March 6, 2012.

§ 39-8607. Inspections.

On and after July 1, 2004, all installations and periodic inspections required by this chapter shall be performed by a QEI as defined in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8607, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8608. Installation permits required — Application — Posting — Exceptions — Other licenses, permits and inspections.

  1. On and after July 1, 2004, it shall be unlawful for any person to do, or cause or permit to be done, whether acting as principal, agent or employee, any installation or major alteration of any conveyance in the state of Idaho without first procuring an installation permit from the division of building safety authorizing the work to be done.
  2. The owner of a conveyance shall submit an application for the permit in a form that the division may prescribe. A copy of the plans or specifications for the installation, erection, major alteration, or relocation shall be attached to the permit application.
  3. The permit issued by the division shall be kept posted conspicuously at the site of installation.
  4. No installation permit is required for repairs and replacement normally necessary for maintenance and made with parts of equivalent materials, strength and design, or for installations and major alterations that have been commenced prior to July 1, 2004, or for new installations let for bid prior to November 1, 2002.
  5. The installation permit and inspections required in this chapter are not exclusive. Installations and major alterations of conveyances as herein defined may be subject to licensing, permitting and inspection requirements set forth in other provisions of law.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8608, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Division of building safety,§ 67-2601A.

§ 39-8609. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of equipment and for periodic tests.

  1. The person installing or altering a conveyance is responsible for its operation and maintenance until the division has issued an operating certificate for the conveyance. The owner is responsible for all tests of a new, relocated or altered conveyance until the division has issued an operating permit for the conveyance.
  2. The owner shall be responsible for the safe operation and proper maintenance of the conveyance after the division has issued the operating certificate and also during the period of effectiveness of any temporary operating permit. The owner shall be responsible for assuring that all required periodic tests are performed by a QEI as defined in this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8609, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8610. Temporary certificate to operate.

A temporary certificate to operate may be issued by the administrator. No temporary certificate shall be issued when life-safety nonconformances are present. Before the expiration of the temporary certificate, the conveyance shall be reinspected and a five (5) year certificate to operate shall be issued or the conveyance shall be put out of service.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8610, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2011, ch. 24, § 1, p. 65.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 24, deleted “and shall be effective for not more than sixty (60) days” from the end of the first sentence and substituted “the temporary certificate” for “sixty (60) days” and “five (5) year certificate” for “permanent certificate” in the last sentence.

§ 39-8611. Certificate to operate.

  1. Inspection and certificate. No conveyance shall be placed into operation until an inspection has been performed and a certificate to operate has been issued by the division.
  2. Inspection prior to issuance. A certificate to operate may be issued only if, after a thorough inspection, the QEI finds that the conveyance meets the required safety standards. If the conveyance is found to be unsafe, the division shall prohibit the use of the conveyance until it is made safe. Conveyances shall comply with the codes set forth in section 39-8614, Idaho Code.
  3. Term of certificate. A certificate to operate shall be in effect for five (5) years, provided that the conveyance continues to meet the requirements of the appropriate codes as evidenced by annual inspections.
  4. Revocation of certificate. The certificate to operate shall remain the property of the state of Idaho and may be revoked at any time if the conveyance fails to meet the requirements of the appropriate codes or if the annual certification fee is not paid.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8611, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2007, ch. 137, § 1, p. 397.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 137, added the last sentence in subsection (2).

§ 39-8612. Operation without certificate may be enjoined.

Whenever any conveyance is being operated without a certificate required by this chapter, the administrator may apply to the district court of the county in which the conveyance is located for a temporary restraining order or a temporary or permanent injunction restraining the operation of the conveyance until the division issues a certificate to operate. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the division shall not be required to post a bond.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8612, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8613. Order to discontinue operation — Notice — Conditions — Contents of order — Rescission of order — Violation — Penalty — Random inspections.

  1. The administrator may order the owner or person operating a conveyance to discontinue the operation of a conveyance, and may place a notice that states that the conveyance shall not be operated, in a conspicuous place in the conveyance if the conveyance:
    1. Has not been constructed, installed, maintained or repaired in accordance with the requirements of this chapter; or
    2. Has otherwise become unsafe.
  2. The administrator’s order is effective immediately and shall not be stayed by a request for an administrative hearing.
  3. The administrator shall prescribe a form for the order to discontinue operation. The order shall specify why the conveyance violates this chapter or is otherwise unsafe.
  4. The administrator shall rescind the order to discontinue operation if the conveyance is fixed or modified to bring it into compliance with this chapter.
  5. An owner or a person that knowingly operates or allows the operation of a conveyance in contravention of an order to discontinue operation, or that removes a notice not to operate, is:
    1. Guilty of a misdemeanor; and
    2. Subject to a civil penalty.
  6. The division may conduct random on-site inspections and tests on existing installations and may witness periodic inspections and testing in order to ensure satisfactory performance.
  7. Administrative hearings of appeals from orders issued by the administrator shall be governed by the provisions of the Idaho administrative procedure act, chapter 67 [52], title 52 [67], Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8613, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Penalty for violations of chapter,§ 39-8619, 39-8620.

Compiler’s Notes.

The bracketed insertions in subsection (7) were added by the compiler to correct the statutory reference.

§ 39-8614. Adoption of codes.

  1. The following codes, including those updates, addenda and amendments thereto hereafter adopted by the division as set forth in the duly promulgated administrative rules, are hereby adopted for all conveyances subject to this chapter as may be applicable:
    1. ANSI/ASME, A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.
    2. ANSI/ASME, A17.3 Safety Code for Existing Elevators and Escalators.
    3. ANSI/ASME, A17.4 Guide for Emergency Personnel.
    4. ANSI/ASME, A17.5 Elevator and Escalator Electrical Equipment.
    5. ANSI/ASME, A17.6 Standard for Elevator Suspension, Compensation, and Governor Systems.
    6. ANSI/ASME, A17.7 Performance-Based Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.
    7. ANSI/ASME, A17.8 Standard for Wind Turbine Tower Elevators.
    8. ICC/ANSI, A117.1 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities.
    9. ANSI/ASME, A18.1 Safety Standard for Platform Lifts and Chairlifts.
    10. ASME, QEI-1 Standard for the Qualification of Elevator Inspectors.
  2. Conveyances placed into operation after July 1, 2004, shall comply with those codes in effect on the date the division received the application for the permit or certificate for the conveyance.
  3. Conveyances placed into operation prior to July 1, 2004, shall be required to comply only with the Safety Code for Existing Elevators and Escalators.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8614, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2007, ch. 137, § 2, p. 397; am. 2020, ch. 99, § 2, p. 258.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 137, designated the formerly undesignated introductory language as subsection (1), inserted “and amendments thereto hereafter adopted by the division” and “as may be applicable below” therein, and made related redesignations; and added subsections (2) and (3).

The 2020 amendment, by ch. 99, rewrote subsection (1) to the extent that a detailed comparison is impracticable.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on the American national standards institute (ANSI), see http://ansi.org .

For more on the American society of mechanical engineers (ASME), see http://www.asme.org .

§ 39-8615. Inspections and tests.

Conveyances shall have an inspection performed in accordance with ANSI/ASME standards set forth in section 39-8614, Idaho Code. The following types of inspections are required:

  1. Acceptance. The initial inspection and tests of new or altered equipment by a QEI to check for compliance with the applicable code requirements.
  2. Periodic. Periodic inspection and tests plus additional detailed examination and operation of equipment at specified intervals performed by a QEI to check for compliance with the applicable code requirements. Periodic inspections are required at least every five (5) years.
  3. Routine. Annual examinations performed in compliance with applicable codes to verify compliance with requirements.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8615, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8616. Fees.

The division shall have authority to charge certain fees in accordance with the fee schedule established by the division, which schedule shall not exceed the amounts set forth as follows and which amounts may be reduced by the division as set forth in duly promulgated administrative rules:

  1. Installation, alteration, modernization or relocation fee schedule. Fees include one (1) plan review and certificate to operate, and two (2) acceptance inspections (each inspection thereafter will incur a reinspection fee):
    1. Certification fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $1,500
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $1,500
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $1,000
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $750
    2. Reinspection fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $500
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $500
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $500
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $250
  2. Annual certificate to operate fee schedule. Fees include annual certificate to operate and periodic inspection (every five (5) years), and one (1) reinspection as may be necessary (each inspection thereafter will incur a reinspection fee):
    1. Certification fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $225
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $225
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $125
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $100
    2. Reinspection fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $225
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $225
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $125
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $100
  3. Temporary certificate to operate fee schedule (same as annual) and one (1) reinspection fee as may be necessary (each inspection thereafter will incur a reinspection fee):
    1. Temporary certification fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $225
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $225
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $125
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $100
    2. Reinspection fee:
      1. Traction and roped hydraulic elevator ...............................  $225
      2. Moving walk/escalator ...............................  $225
      3. Hydraulic elevator ...............................  $125
      4. Platform lift/material lift/dumbwaiter ...............................  $100
  4. Application for initial certification (nonrefundable): All conveyances ...............................  $50
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8616, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2007, ch. 137, § 3, p. 397.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 137, rewrote the introductory language, which formerly read: “Fees to be charged by the division shall be as follows”; and in the introductory language in subsections (2) and (3), added “and (1) reinspection fee as may be necessary (each inspection thereafter will incur a reinspection fee)” or similar language.

Compiler’s Notes.

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

§ 39-8617. Annual renewal.

Certificates to operate shall be renewed annually by making application to the division on such forms as the division may prescribe. Successful application shall require payment of the annual renewal fee and submission of a satisfactory routine inspection form, provided however, that on each five (5) year anniversary of issuance of the certificate, successful application shall require payment of the annual renewal fee and submission of a satisfactory periodic inspection form.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8617, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8618. Inspection reports and compliance agreements.

  1. Within fifteen (15) days of completion of the inspection, all inspection reports shall be filed with the division and a copy shall be sent to the owner for corrective actions as required.
  2. Within thirty (30) days of the delivery of an inspection report to the owner and the division, the owner and the division shall enter into a compliance agreement whereby the owner and the division shall agree upon a schedule for corrective actions identified in the inspection report. The division shall issue a temporary certificate to operate if the corrective actions are not related to life safety issues. The owner and the division shall thereafter act in good faith to comply with the provisions of the compliance agreement.
  3. Where there are practical difficulties involved in complying with this chapter or any provision of any applicable code, as part of a compliance agreement, the owner and the division may identify alternative means of compliance so long as such alternative means do not lessen health, fire and life safety requirements and are otherwise consistent with the intent and purpose of applicable codes.
  4. An owner’s failure to complete the corrective actions set forth in the compliance agreement shall constitute grounds for the imposition of civil penalties and such further action as the division may deem appropriate if the owner:
    1. Fails to initiate corrective action; and
    2. Fails to provide evidence of compliance within thirty (30) days of the owner’s receipt of written notice from the division of a failure to comply.
  5. An owner shall not be deemed to be in violation of this chapter:
    1. If the owner and the division are in the process of entering into a compliance agreement; or
    2. If the owner is undertaking corrective action as set forth in the compliance agreement; or
    3. If upon the expiration of thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from the division specifying the particulars in which the owner has failed to perform its obligations under a compliance agreement, the owner fails, prior to expiration of said thirty (30) day period, to rectify the particulars specified in such notice; or
    4. If an owner’s failure to perform under this chapter cannot be reasonably rectified within thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from the division, but the owner, having received the notice, has commenced actions necessary to cure the failure and is diligently pursuing the cure of the failure.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8618, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067; am. 2007, ch. 137, § 4, p. 397.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2007 amendment, by ch. 137, added the subsection (1) and (4) designations and added subsections (2), (3), and (5); and in subsection (4), in the introductory language, added “An owner’s” and “if the owner,” and substituted “complete the corrective actions set forth in the compliance agreement” for “complete corrective actions within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the inspection report,” and added paragraphs (4)(a) and (4)(b).

§ 39-8619. Violations — Misdemeanors.

  1. Any person who willfully violates any provision of this chapter or the duly promulgated rules hereunder is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300) or by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months or by both such fine and imprisonment.
  2. A separate violation is deemed to have occurred with respect to each conveyance not in compliance with this chapter. Each day such violation continues constitutes a separate offense.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8619, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8620. Civil penalty for violation of chapter — Notice.

  1. The administrator may assess a penalty against a person violating a provision of this chapter. The penalty shall be not more than five hundred dollars ($500) per violation. Each day that the violation continues is a separate violation and is subject to a separate penalty.
  2. The administrator shall notify the violator of his action and the reasons for his action in writing. The administrator shall send the notice by certified mail to the violator’s last known address. The notice shall inform the violator that a hearing may be requested under the provisions of the Idaho administrative procedure act, chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. A request for a hearing shall not stay the effect of the penalty.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8620, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8621. No limitation or assumption of liability.

This chapter shall not be construed to relieve or lessen the responsibility of any person, firm or corporation owning, operating, controlling, maintaining, erecting, constructing, installing, altering, inspecting, testing or repairing any conveyance covered by this chapter for damages to any person or property caused by any defect therein, nor does the state assume any such liability or responsibility for any liability to any person for whatever reason whatsoever by the adoption of this chapter or any acts or omissions arising hereunder.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8621, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8622. Accidents — Report and investigation — Cessation of use — Removal of damaged parts.

The owner shall promptly notify the division of each accident to a person requiring the service of a physician or resulting in a disability exceeding one (1) day and shall afford the division every facility for investigating and inspecting the accident. After being so notified, the division shall without delay make an inspection and shall place on file a full and complete report of the accident. The report shall detail all material facts and information gathered as a part of the investigation and shall include the potential cause or causes of the accident, as may be ascertained by the division. The report shall be open to public inspection at all reasonable hours. When an accident involves the failure or destruction of any part of the construction or the operating mechanism of a conveyance, the use of the conveyance is forbidden until it has been made safe, it has been reinspected, any repairs, changes or alterations have been approved by the division, and a permit has been issued by the division. The removal of any part of the damaged construction or operating mechanism from the premises is forbidden until the division grants permission to do so.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8622, as added by 2004, ch. 359, § 1, p. 1067.

§ 39-8623. Idaho elevator safety fund established.

All moneys received by the administrator under the provisions of this chapter shall be paid into the state treasury as directed by section 59-1014, Idaho Code, and shall be placed by the state treasurer to the credit of a dedicated fund to be known as the “Idaho Elevator Safety Fund” which is hereby established. All such moneys hereafter placed in the fund are hereby set aside and appropriated to the division of building safety to carry into effect the provisions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8623, as added by 2006, ch. 81, § 1, p. 243.

Chapter 87 IDAHO COMMONSENSE CONSUMPTION ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8701. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Commonsense Consumption Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8701, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

§ 39-8702. Prevention of frivolous lawsuits.

Except as provided in section 39-8703, Idaho Code, a manufacturer, packer, distributor, carrier, holder, seller, marketer or advertiser of a food, as defined in section 39-8704, Idaho Code, or an association of one (1) or more of such entities, shall not be subject to civil liability arising under any Idaho law for any claim, as defined in section 39-8704, Idaho Code, arising out of weight gain, obesity, a health condition associated with weight gain or obesity, or any other generally known obesity-related condition allegedly caused by or allegedly likely to result from long-term consumption of food.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8702, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

§ 39-8703. Exemption.

Notwithstanding section 39-8702, Idaho Code, civil liability shall not be precluded where the claim of weight gain, obesity, a health condition associated with weight gain or obesity, or any other generally known obesity-related condition allegedly caused by or allegedly likely to result from long-term consumption of food is based on:

  1. A material violation of an adulteration or misbranding provision set forth by statute, rule or regulation in Idaho or the United States provided the claimed injury was proximately caused by such violation; or
  2. Any other material violation of federal or state law applicable to manufacturing, marketing, distribution, advertising, labeling or the sale of food, provided such violation is knowing and willful, as defined in section 39-8704, Idaho Code, and provided further that the claimed injury was proximately caused by such violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8703, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

§ 39-8704. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Claim” means any claim by or on behalf of a natural person as well as any derivative or other claim arising therefrom asserted by or on behalf of any other person.
  2. “Food” means:
    1. Articles used for food or drink for persons or other animals;
    2. Chewing gum; and
    3. Articles used for components of any other such article.
  3. “Generally known obesity-related condition allegedly caused by or allegedly likely to result from long-term consumption” means an obesity-related condition generally known to result or to likely result from the cumulative effect of consumption and not from a single instance of consumption.
  4. “Knowing and willful violation” means:
    1. The conduct constituting the violation was committed with the intent to deceive or injure consumers or with actual knowledge that such conduct was injurious to consumers; and
    2. The conduct constituting the violation was not required by any law, regulation, order or rule of the United States, the state of Idaho, or any political subdivision thereof.
  5. “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, firm, association, governmental subdivision or agency, public or private organization or other legal entity.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8704, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

§ 39-8705. Pleading requirements.

  1. In any action exempted pursuant to section 39-8703(1), Idaho Code, the complaint initiating such action shall state with particularity the following:
    1. The statute, rule, regulation or other law of Idaho or the United States that was allegedly violated;
    2. The facts that are alleged to constitute a material violation of such law; and
    3. The facts that are alleged to demonstrate that such violation proximately caused actual injury to the plaintiff.
  2. In any action exempted pursuant to section 39-8703(2), Idaho Code, the complaint initiating such action shall state with particularity facts sufficient to support a reasonable inference that the violation was done with the intent to deceive or injure consumers or with actual knowledge that such violation was injurious to consumers.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8705, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

§ 39-8706. Stay pending motion to dismiss.

In any action exempted pursuant to section 39-8703, Idaho Code, all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss unless the court finds upon the motion of any party that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to that party. During the pendency of any stay of discovery, unless otherwise ordered by the court, any party to the action with actual notice of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all documents, data compilations, including electronically recorded or stored data, and tangible objects that are in the custody or control of such party and that are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production of documents from an opposing party.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8706, as added by 2004, ch. 380, § 1, p. 1140.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2004, ch. 380, provided: “The provisions of this act shall apply to all covered claims pending on the effective date of this act [July 1, 2004] and to all claims filed thereafter, regardless of when the claim arose.”

Chapter 88 IDAHO UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK ACT

Sec.

§ 39-8801. Short title.

This act may be known and cited as the “Idaho Underground Storage Tank Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8801, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2007, ch. 29, which is codified as§§ 39-8801 to 39-8812.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8802. Legislative findings and intent.

  1. The legislature of the state of Idaho finds:
    1. That the protection of the environment from leaking underground storage tanks is a matter of statewide concern;
    2. That subchapter IX of the solid waste disposal act (42 U.S.C. 6991, et seq. (2000)), as amended by the underground storage tank compliance act, public law 109-58, title XV, August 8, 2005, and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, establish federal law regulating underground storage tanks; and
    3. That 42 U.S.C. 6991c(a) and 40 CFR part 281 allow the administrator of the United States environmental protection agency to approve a state program.
  2. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature:
    1. To establish a state underground storage tank program to comply with the requirements of the underground storage tank compliance act, public law 109-58, title XV, August 8, 2005, and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and 40 CFR part 280, so that the Idaho department of environmental quality may promulgate rules, through negotiated rulemaking, to implement a state underground storage tank program as provided in section 39-8805, Idaho Code;
    2. That such program not constitute a new corrective action program;
    3. That such program qualify the state for federal funding from the federal leaking underground storage tank trust fund;
    4. That such program may be funded as provided in section 39-119, Idaho Code, not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) per tank per year. These funds shall only be used for the underground storage tank program;
    5. A fee balance greater than thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) as of December 31 of each year, excluding any early payments for the fees due January 2 of the following year, shall be used to reduce the following year’s fee; and
    6. Prior to February 1 of each year, the director shall report to the governor and the legislature on the use of fees collected the previous year. At a minimum, the report shall include:
      1. A list of all tanks subject to inspection;
      2. The type of inspection and regulatory authority or guidance used; and
      3. A detailed accounting of how fee funds were spent.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8802, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57; am. 2016, ch. 52, § 1, p. 148.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 52, rewrote paragraph (2)(d), which formerly read: “That such program not be funded by user fees or other fees for service such as that provided in section 39-119, Idaho Code”; and added paragraphs (2)(e) and (2)(f).

Federal References.

The federal leaking underground storage tank trust fund, referred to at the end of paragraph (2)(c), is established at 26 USCS § 9508.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8803. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Board” means the Idaho board of environmental quality.
  2. “Board of trustees” means the board of trustees established in section 41-4904, Idaho Code.
  3. “Department” means the Idaho department of environmental quality.
  4. “Director” means the director of the Idaho department of environmental quality.
  5. “Underground storage tank system” means underground storage tank as defined by 42 U.S.C. 6991(10).
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8803, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Board of environmental quality,§ 39-107.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8804. Program scope.

The requirements of this chapter and rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter, shall apply to underground storage tank systems in the state of Idaho, owners and operators of underground storage tank systems in the state of Idaho, persons who install or inspect installations of underground storage tank systems in the state of Idaho, persons who manufacture any regulated component of an underground storage tank system installed in the state of Idaho, and persons who deliver fuel to a regulated underground storage tank system in the state of Idaho.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8804, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8805. Rules governing underground storage tank systems.

  1. Pursuant to the procedures established by the Idaho administrative procedure act, chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, the department shall promulgate through negotiated rulemaking, and the board shall adopt, rules as are necessary to regulate underground storage tank systems within the state. This includes, but is not limited to, rules addressing:
    1. Inspection and certification of underground storage tanks;
    2. Operator training;
    3. Release prevention, compliance and enforcement;
    4. Delivery prohibitions; and
    5. Additional measures to protect ground water.
  2. The board of trustees shall participate in any such negotiated rulemaking through designated representatives.
  3. The rules, promulgated and adopted pursuant to this chapter, and guidance or policy provisions developed in regard to rules promulgated and adopted pursuant to this chapter, shall not be broader in scope, more stringent than, or propose to regulate an activity not regulated by federal law or regulations governing underground storage tanks except as provided by section 39-107D, Idaho Code.
  4. To the degree that any rule promulgated and adopted pursuant to this chapter, or guidance or policy developed in regard to any rule promulgated and adopted pursuant to this chapter, is based upon science, the department shall use:
    1. The best available peer reviewed science and supporting studies conducted in accordance with sound and objective scientific practices; and
    2. Data collected by accepted methods or best available methods if the reliability of the method and the nature of the decision justifies use of the data.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8805, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8805A. Compliance date for certain rules.

  1. Compliance with the additional testing and inspection requirements set forth in 40 CFR 280.10 concerning emergency power generators, 40 CFR 280.35 concerning spill prevention equipment and containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of piping and overfill prevention equipment, and 40 CFR 280.40 concerning release detection, as adopted by Idaho and incorporated by reference in IDAPA 58.01.07.004, shall be required only on and after October 13, 2021, notwithstanding any prior date set forth in said regulations or rule.
  2. The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall be retroactive to the effective date of IDAPA 58.01.07.004, to wit March 24, 2017.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8805A, as added by 2019, ch. 34, § 1, p. 96.

§ 39-8806. Additional measures to protect ground water.

New and replacement underground storage tank systems and connected piping installed after the effective date of this chapter and located within one thousand (1,000) feet of any existing community water system or any existing potable drinking water well, shall comply with the secondary containment requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6991b(i)(1).

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8806, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “effective date of this chapter” refers to the effective date of S.L. 2007, Ch. 29, which was February 23, 2007.

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8807. Operator training.

  1. The department shall adopt an operator training program to be conducted by either the department or a state of Idaho approved third party to help underground storage tank system owners and operators and their employees understand and comply with the requirements of this chapter and rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter. The training shall be consistent with 42 U.S.C. 6991i(a).
  2. Training conducted by the department shall be offered on location to owners, operators and employees of underground storage tank systems regulated under this chapter. The training shall be specific to the equipment on location.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8807, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57; am. 2016, ch. 52, § 2, p. 148.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 52, deleted “at no cost” following “offered” in the first sentence of subsection (2).

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8808. Inspections.

  1. Underground storage tank systems regulated under this chapter which have not been inspected by the department or the United States environmental protection agency since December 22, 1998, shall be inspected by the department in compliance with this chapter.
  2. After completion of all inspections required under subsection (1) of this section, the department or a third party inspector certified by an approved state or national program, shall conduct on-site inspections of underground storage tank systems regulated under this chapter at least once every three (3) years to determine compliance with this chapter.
  3. If the department conducts the inspection, it shall not charge an additional fee for the inspection.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8808, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57; am. 2016, ch. 52, § 3, p. 148.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2016 amendment, by ch. 52, substituted “an additional fee” for “a fee” in subsection (3).

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8809. Delivery prohibition.

  1. Effective August 8, 2007, it shall be unlawful for any person to deliver to, deposit into, or accept a regulated substance into an underground storage tank regulated under this chapter at a facility which has been identified by the department to be ineligible for such delivery, deposit, or acceptance.
  2. The department shall promulgate through negotiated rulemaking, and the board shall adopt, rules governing delivery prohibition as provided in section 39-8805, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8809, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8810. Underground storage tank database.

The department shall develop and use a database, which shall be available to the public on the internet, detailing the status of all underground storage tanks in the state of Idaho which are subject to regulation, including whether they are subject to delivery prohibition. The department shall develop the database within one (1) year of the effective date of this chapter. Such database shall be accurate, updated no less than quarterly, and subject to public review and correction by petition to the department.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8810, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “effective date of this chapter” refers to the effective date of S.L. 2007, Ch. 29, which was February 23, 2007.

For more on the underground storage tank database, see http://www.deq.idaho.gov/ waste/progissues/ustlust/index.cfm .

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8811. Enforcement.

Failure to comply with this chapter or rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to enforcement pursuant to the enforcement provisions of the Idaho environmental protection and health act contained in section 39-108, Idaho Code, provided however, that any monetary penalties for violations of the provisions of this chapter, or rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter, shall be assessed against the violator, or the violator shall be sued to recover in court, as follows:

  1. Anyone subject to the provisions of this chapter as provided in section 39-8804, Idaho Code, or rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter, who has been determined in a civil enforcement action to have failed to comply with tank notification requirements, or to have submitted false information pursuant to tank notification requirements, as provided in this chapter, any rule promulgated pursuant to this chapter or any order entered related to such violation, shall be liable for penalties of up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation.
  2. Anyone subject to the provisions of this chapter as provided in section 39-8804, Idaho Code, or rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter, who has been determined in a civil enforcement action to have failed to comply with any provisions of this chapter, any rule promulgated pursuant to this chapter or any order entered related to such violation, for existing or new tank systems, shall be liable for penalties of up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each tank for each day of violation. If the violation is continuous, the violator shall be liable for penalties of up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each day of violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8811, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57; am. 2011, ch. 41, § 1, p. 96.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2011 amendment, by ch. 41, added “provided, however, that any monetary penalties for violations of the provisions of this chapter, or rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter, shall be assessed against the violator, or the violator shall be sued to recover in court, as follows” at the end of the introductory paragraph and added subsections (1) and (2).

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

Section 2 of S.L. 2011, ch. 41 declared an emergency. Approved March 8, 2011.

§ 39-8812. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of remaining portions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8812, as added by 2007, ch. 29, § 1, p. 57.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 2 of S.L. 2007, ch. 29 declared an emergency. Approved February 23, 2007.

§ 39-8813. Idaho underground storage tank program fund.

  1. All moneys received from fees collected from all regulated underground storage tanks shall be forwarded to the department and shall be paid into the Idaho underground storage tank program fund, which is hereby created in the office of the state treasurer.
  2. Such moneys and all interest earned thereon shall be kept in the Idaho underground storage tank program fund and shall be expended for compliance, training, technical, legal and administrative support necessary for implementing the program required under the Idaho underground storage tank act as provided in this chapter.
  3. Costs and expenses incurred by the department in performing the duties, and the exercise of its powers in carrying out the underground storage tank program, shall be paid out of the fund.
  4. Idle moneys in the Idaho underground storage tank program fund established in this section shall be invested by the state treasurer as provided in section 67-1210, Idaho Code. Interest earned on all such investments shall be paid into the fund. Moneys in the fund may be expended pursuant to appropriation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8813, as added by 2017, ch. 40, § 1, p. 62.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State treasurer,§ 67-1201 et seq.

Chapter 89 REDUCED CIGARETTE IGNITION PROPENSITY

Sec.

§ 39-8901. Short title. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

This act may be known and cited as the “Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity and Firefighter Protection Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8901, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 792.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2008, ch. 278, which is codified as§§ 39-8901 to 39-8911.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8902. Definitions. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Agent” means any person authorized by the state tax commission to purchase and affix stamps on packages of cigarettes.
  2. “Cigarette” means any roll for smoking, whether made wholly or in part of tobacco or any other substance, irrespective of size or shape, and whether or not such tobacco or substance is flavored, adulterated or mixed with any other ingredient, the wrapper or cover of which is made of paper or any other substance or material, other than tobacco.
  3. “Manufacturer” means:
    1. Any entity that manufactures or otherwise produces cigarettes or causes cigarettes to be manufactured or produced anywhere that the manufacturer intends to be sold in this state, including cigarettes intended to be sold in the United States through an importer; or
    2. The first purchaser anywhere that intends to resell in the United States cigarettes manufactured anywhere that the original manufacturer or maker does not intend to be sold in the United States; or
    3. Any entity that becomes a successor of an entity described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection.
  4. “Quality control and quality assurance program” means the laboratory procedures implemented to ensure that operator bias, systematic and nonsystematic methodological errors, and equipment-related problems do not affect the results of the testing. The program ensures that the testing repeatability remains within the required repeatability values stated in section 39-8903(1)(f), Idaho Code, for all test trials used to certify cigarettes in accordance with this chapter.
  5. “Repeatability” means the range of values within which the repeat results of cigarette test trials from a single laboratory will fall ninety-five percent (95%) of the time.
  6. “Retail dealer” means any person, other than a manufacturer or wholesale dealer, engaged in selling cigarettes or tobacco products.
  7. “Sale” means any transfer of title or possession or both, exchange or barter, conditional or otherwise, in any manner or by any means whatever or any agreement therefor. In addition to cash and credit sales, the giving of cigarettes as samples, prizes or gifts, and the exchanging of cigarettes for any consideration other than money, are considered sales.
  8. “Wholesale dealer” means any person other than a manufacturer who sells cigarettes or tobacco products to retail dealers or other persons for purposes of resale, and any person who owns, operates or maintains one (1) or more cigarette or tobacco product vending machines in, at or upon premises owned or occupied by any other person.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8902, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 792.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8903. Test method and performance standard. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

  1. Except as provided in subsection (7) of this section, no cigarettes may be sold or offered for sale in this state or offered for sale or sold to persons located in this state unless the cigarettes have been tested in accordance with the test method and meet the performance standard specified in this section, a written certification has been filed by the manufacturer with the state fire marshal in accordance with section 39-8904, Idaho Code, and the cigarettes have been marked in accordance with section 39-8905, Idaho Code.
    1. Testing of cigarettes shall be conducted in accordance with the American society of testing and materials (ASTM) standard E2187-04, “standard test method for measuring the ignition strength of cigarettes.”
    2. Testing shall be conducted on ten (10) layers of filter paper.
    3. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the cigarettes tested in a test trial in accordance with this section shall exhibit full-length burns. Forty (40) replicate tests shall comprise a complete test trial for each cigarette tested.
    4. The performance standard required in this section shall only be applied to a complete test trial.
    5. Written certifications shall be based upon testing conducted by a laboratory that has been accredited pursuant to standard ISO/IEC 17025 of the international organization for standardization (ISO), or other comparable accreditation standard required by the state fire marshal.
    6. Laboratories conducting testing in accordance with this section shall implement a quality control and quality assurance program that includes a procedure that will determine the repeatability of the testing results. The repeatability value shall be no greater than 0.19.
    7. This section does not require additional testing if cigarettes are tested consistent with this chapter for any other purpose.
    8. Testing performed or sponsored by the state fire marshal to determine a cigarette’s compliance with the performance standard required in this section shall be conducted in accordance with this section.
  2. Each cigarette listed in a certification submitted pursuant to section 39-8904, Idaho Code, that uses lowered permeability bands in the cigarette paper to achieve compliance with the performance standard set forth in this section shall have at least two (2) nominally identical bands on the paper surrounding the tobacco column. At least one (1) complete band shall be located at least fifteen (15) millimeters from the lighting end of the cigarette. For cigarettes on which the bands are positioned by design, there shall be at least two (2) bands fully located at least fifteen (15) millimeters from the lighting end and ten (10) millimeters from the filter end of the tobacco column, or ten (10) millimeters from the labeled end of the tobacco column for nonfiltered cigarettes.
  3. A manufacturer of a cigarette that the state fire marshal determines cannot be tested in accordance with the test method prescribed in paragraph (1)(a) of this section shall propose a test method and performance standard for the cigarette to the state fire marshal. Upon approval of the proposed test method and a determination by the state fire marshal that the performance standard proposed by the manufacturer is equivalent to the performance standard prescribed in paragraph (1)(c) of this section, the manufacturer may employ that test method and performance standard to certify the cigarette pursuant to section 39-8904, Idaho Code. If the state fire marshal determines that another state has enacted reduced cigarette ignition propensity standards that include a test method and performance standard that are the same as those contained in this chapter, and the state fire marshal finds that the officials responsible for implementing those requirements have approved the proposed alternative test method and performance standard for a particular cigarette proposed by a manufacturer as meeting the fire safety standards of that state’s law or regulation under a legal provision comparable to this section, then the state fire marshal shall authorize that manufacturer to employ the alternative test method and performance standard to certify that cigarette for sale in this state, unless the state fire marshal demonstrates a reasonable basis why the alternative test should not be accepted under this chapter. All other applicable requirements of this section shall apply to the manufacturer. (4) Each manufacturer shall maintain copies of the reports of all tests conducted on all cigarettes offered for sale for a period of three (3) years, and shall make copies of these reports available to the state fire marshal and the attorney general upon written request. Any manufacturer who fails to make copies of these reports available within sixty (60) days of receiving a written request shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each day after the sixtieth day that the manufacturer does not make the copies available.
    1. Wholesale or retail dealers from selling their existing inventory of cigarettes on or after the effective date of this chapter if the wholesale or retail dealer can establish that state tax stamps were affixed to the cigarettes prior to the effective date and the wholesale or retail dealer can establish that the inventory was purchased prior to the effective date in comparable quantity to the inventory purchased during the same period of the prior year; or
    2. The sale of cigarettes solely for the purpose of consumer testing. For purposes of this subsection, the term “consumer testing” means an assessment of cigarettes that is conducted by a manufacturer, or under the control and direction of a manufacturer, for the purpose of evaluating consumer acceptance of those cigarettes, utilizing only the quantity of cigarettes that is reasonably necessary for the assessment.

(5) The state fire marshal may adopt a subsequent ASTM standard test method for measuring the ignition strength of cigarettes upon a finding that the subsequent method does not result in a change in the percentage of full-length burns exhibited by any tested cigarette when compared to the percentage of full-length burns the same cigarette would exhibit when tested in accordance with ASTM standard E2187-04 and the performance standard in subsection (1)(c) of this section.

(6) The state fire marshal shall review the effectiveness of this section and report the state fire marshal’s findings every three (3) years to the legislature and, if appropriate, make recommendations for legislation to improve the effectiveness of this chapter. The report and legislative recommendations shall be submitted no later than June 30 following the conclusion of each three (3) year period.

(7) The requirements of subsection (1) of this section shall not prohibit:

(8) This chapter shall be implemented in accordance with the implementation and substance of the New York fire safety standards for cigarettes.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8903, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 793.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more on ASTM E2187-09, see http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2187.htm .

For more on ISO/IEC 17025, see http://www.isoiec17025.com/wst page4.html .

The phrase “the effective date of this chapter” in paragraph (7)(a) refers to the effective date of S.L. 2008, ch. 278, which was April 1, 2009.

For more on the New York fire safety standards for cigarettes, see http://firesafe cigarettes.org/assets/files/Harvardstudy.pdf .

The words enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8904. Certification and product change. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

  1. Each manufacturer shall submit to the state fire marshal a written certification attesting that:
    1. Each cigarette listed in the certification has been tested in accordance with section 39-8903, Idaho Code; and
    2. Each cigarette listed in the certification meets the performance standard set forth in section 39-8903, Idaho Code.
  2. Each cigarette listed in the certification shall be described with the following information:
    1. Brand, or trade name on the package;
    2. Style, such as light or ultra light;
    3. Length in millimeters;
    4. Circumference in millimeters;
    5. Flavor, such as menthol or chocolate, if applicable;
    6. Filter or nonfilter;
    7. Package description, such as soft pack or box;
    8. Marking pursuant to section 39-8905, Idaho Code;
    9. The name, address and telephone number of the laboratory, if different than the manufacturer that conducted the test; and
    10. The date that the testing occurred.
  3. The certifications shall be made available to the attorney general for purposes consistent with this chapter and the state tax commission for purposes of ensuring compliance with this section.
  4. Each cigarette certified under this section shall be recertified every three (3) years.
  5. For each brand family listed in a certification, a manufacturer shall pay to the state fire marshal a one thousand dollar ($1000) fee. The fee paid shall apply to all cigarettes within the brand family certified and shall include any new cigarette certified within the brand family during the three (3) year certification period.
  6. All moneys collected as certification fees submitted by manufacturers shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of a special account in the state operating fund hereby created to be known as the “Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity and Firefighter Protection Act Enforcement Fund.” The fund shall, in addition to any other moneys made available for that purpose, be available to the state fire marshal solely to support processing, testing, enforcement and oversight activities under this chapter.
  7. If a manufacturer has certified a cigarette pursuant to this section, and thereafter makes any change to the cigarette that is likely to alter its compliance with the reduced cigarette ignition propensity standards required in this chapter, that cigarette shall not be sold or offered for sale in this state until the manufacturer retests the cigarette in accordance with the testing standards set forth in section 39-8903, Idaho Code, and maintains records of that retesting as required by section 39-8903, Idaho Code. Any altered cigarette which does not meet the performance standard set forth in section 39-8903, Idaho Code, may not be sold in this state.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8904, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 795.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8905. Marking of cigarette packaging. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

  1. Cigarettes that are certified by a manufacturer in accordance with section 39-8904, Idaho Code, shall be marked to indicate compliance with the requirements of section 39-8903, Idaho Code. The marking shall be in eight (8) point type or larger and consist of:
    1. Modification of the product UPC code to include a visible mark printed at or around the area of the UPC code. The mark may consist of alphanumeric or symbolic characters permanently stamped, engraved, embossed or printed in conjunction with the UPC; or
    2. Any visible combination of alphanumeric or symbolic characters permanently stamped, engraved or embossed upon the cigarette package or cellophane wrap; or
    3. Printed, stamped, engraved or embossed text that indicates that the cigarettes meet the standards of this chapter.
  2. A manufacturer shall use only one (1) marking, and shall apply this marking uniformly for all packages including, but not limited to, packs, cartons and cases, and brands marketed by that manufacturer.
  3. The state fire marshal shall be notified as to the marking that is selected.
  4. Prior to the certification of any cigarette, a manufacturer shall present its proposed marking to the state fire marshal for approval. Upon receipt of the request, the state fire marshal shall approve or disapprove the marking offered, except that the state fire marshal shall approve:
    1. Any marking in use and approved for sale in another state; or
    2. The letters “FSC,” which signify fire standards compliant, appearing in eight (8) point type or larger and permanently printed, stamped, engraved or embossed on the package at or near the UPC code.
  5. No manufacturer shall modify its approved marking unless the modification has been approved by the state fire marshal in accordance with this section.
  6. Manufacturers certifying cigarettes in accordance with section 39-8904, Idaho Code, shall provide a copy of the certifications to all wholesale dealers and agents to which they sell cigarettes, and shall also provide sufficient copies of an illustration of the package marking utilized by the manufacturer pursuant to this section for each retail dealer to which the wholesale dealers or agents sell cigarettes. Wholesale dealers and agents shall provide a copy of these package markings received from manufacturers to all retail dealers to which they sell cigarettes. Wholesale dealers, agents and retail dealers shall permit the state fire marshal, the state tax commission, the attorney general, and their employees to inspect markings of cigarette packaging marked in accordance with this section.

Proposed markings shall be deemed approved if the state fire marshal fails to act within ten (10) business days of receiving a request for approval.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8905, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 796.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8906. Penalties. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

  1. A manufacturer, wholesale dealer, agent or any other person or entity who knowingly sells or offers to sell cigarettes, other than through retail sale, in violation of section 39-8903, Idaho Code, shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for each pack of the cigarettes sold or offered for sale; provided however, that in no case shall the penalty against that person or entity exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) during any thirty (30) day period.
  2. A retail dealer who knowingly sells or offers to sell cigarettes in violation of section 39-8903, Idaho Code, shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for each pack of the cigarettes sold or offered for sale; provided however, that in no case shall the penalty against that retail dealer exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) during any thirty (30) day period.
  3. In addition to any penalty prescribed by law, any corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, limited partnership or association engaged in the manufacture of cigarettes that knowingly makes a false certification pursuant to section 39-8904, Idaho Code, shall be subject to a civil penalty of at least seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) and not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for each false certification.
  4. Any person violating any other provision in this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty for a first offense not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), and for a subsequent offense subject to a civil penalty not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each violation.
  5. Any cigarettes that have been sold or offered for sale that do not comply with the performance standard required by section 39-8903, Idaho Code, shall be subject to forfeiture. Cigarettes forfeited pursuant to this subsection shall be destroyed; provided however, that prior to the destruction of any cigarettes forfeited pursuant to these provisions, the true holder of the trademark rights in the cigarette brand shall be permitted to inspect the cigarettes.
  6. In addition to any other remedy provided by law, the state fire marshal or attorney general may file an action in district court for a violation of this chapter, including petitioning for injunctive relief or to recover any costs or damages suffered by the state because of a violation of this chapter, including enforcement costs relating to the specific violation and attorney’s fees. Each violation of this chapter or of rules adopted under this chapter constitutes a separate civil violation for which the state fire marshal or attorney general may obtain relief.
  7. Whenever any law enforcement personnel or duly authorized representative of the state fire marshal shall discover any cigarettes that have not been marked in the manner required in section 39-8905, Idaho Code, the personnel is hereby authorized and empowered to seize and take possession of the cigarettes. The cigarettes shall be turned over to the state tax commission, and shall be forfeited to the state. Cigarettes seized pursuant to this subsection shall be destroyed; provided however, that prior to the destruction of any cigarettes seized pursuant to these provisions, the true holder of the trademark rights in the cigarette brand shall be permitted to inspect the cigarettes.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8906, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 797.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8907. Implementation. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

  1. The state fire marshal may promulgate rules pursuant to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, the administrative procedure act, necessary to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.
  2. The state tax commission in the regular course of conducting inspections of wholesale dealers, agents and retail dealers, as authorized under chapter 25, title 63, Idaho Code, may inspect the cigarettes to determine if the cigarettes are marked as required in section 39-8905, Idaho Code. If the cigarettes are not marked as required, the state tax commission shall notify the state fire marshal.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-8907, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 798.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided: “Local Regulation. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the local governmental units of this state may neither enact nor enforce any ordinance or other local law or regulation conflicting with, or preempted by, any provision of this chapter or with any policy of this state expressed by this chapter, whether that policy be expressed by inclusion of a provision in this chapter or by exclusion of that subject from this chapter.”

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8908. Inspection. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

To enforce the provisions of this chapter, the attorney general, the state tax commission and the state fire marshal, their duly authorized representatives and other law enforcement personnel are hereby authorized to examine the books, papers, invoices and other records of any person in possession, control or occupancy of any premises where cigarettes are placed, stored, sold or offered for sale, as well as the stock of cigarettes on the premises. Every person in the possession, control or occupancy of any premises where cigarettes are placed, sold or offered for sale, is hereby directed and required to give the attorney general, the state tax commission and the state fire marshal, their duly authorized representatives and other law enforcement personnel the means, facilities and opportunity for the examinations authorized in this section.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8908, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 798.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

State tax commission, Idaho Const., Art. VII, § 12 and§ 63-101 et seq.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8909. Reduced cigarette ignition propensity and firefighter protection act fund. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

All moneys collected as civil penalties under section 39-8906, Idaho Code, shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of a special account in the state operating fund hereby created to be known as the “Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity and Firefighter Protection Act Fund.” The moneys shall be deposited to the credit of the fund and shall, in addition to any other moneys made available for that purpose, be made available to the state fire marshal to support fire safety and prevention programs.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8909, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 798.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State fire marshal,§§ 41-254, 41-255.

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8910. Sale outside of Idaho. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit any person or entity from manufacturing or selling cigarettes that do not meet the requirements of section 39-8903, Idaho Code, if the cigarettes are or will be stamped for sale in another state or are packaged for sale outside the United States and that person or entity has taken reasonable steps to ensure that the cigarettes will not be sold or offered for sale to persons located in this state.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8910, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 798.

STATUTORY NOTES

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

§ 39-8911. Preemption. [Contingent repeal — See § 39-8911.]

This chapter shall be repealed if a federal reduced cigarette ignition propensity standard that preempts this chapter is adopted and becomes effective.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-8911, as added by 2008, ch. 278, § 1, p. 798.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided: “Local Regulation. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the local governmental units of this state may neither enact nor enforce any ordinance or other local law or regulation conflicting with, or preempted by, any provision of this chapter or with any policy of this state expressed by this chapter, whether that policy be expressed by inclusion of a provision in this chapter or by exclusion of that subject from this chapter.”

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2008, ch. 278 provided that Section 1 of the act, enacting chapter 89, title 39, Idaho Code, should take effect on and after the first day of the thirteenth month after passage and approval [April 1, 2009].

Chapter 90 IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT

Sec.

§ 39-9001. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Health Freedom Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9001, as added by 2010, ch. 46, § 1, p. 84.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Idaho Law Review.

Idaho Law Review. — Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Nullification and the Question of Gubernatorial Executive Power in Idaho, Comment. 49 Idaho L. Rev. 659 (2013).

§ 39-9002. Definitions.

  1. “Health care services” shall mean any service, treatment, or provision of product for the care of physical or mental disease, illness, injury, defect or condition, or to otherwise maintain or improve physical or mental health, subject to all laws and rules regulating health service providers and products within the state of Idaho.
  2. “Mode of securing” shall mean to purchase directly or on credit or by trade, or to contract for third-party payment by insurance or other legal means authorized by the state of Idaho, or to apply for or accept employer or government sponsored health care benefits under such conditions as may legally be required as a condition of such benefits, or any combination of the same.
  3. “Penalty” shall mean any civil or criminal fine, tax, salary or wage withholding, surcharge, fee or any other imposed consequence, established by law or rule of the federal government of the United States of America or its subdivision or agency, that is used to punish or discourage the exercise of rights protected under this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9002, as added by 2010, ch. 46, § 1, p. 84.

§ 39-9003. Statement of public policy.

  1. The power to require or regulate a person’s choice in the mode of securing health care services, or to impose a penalty related thereto, is not found in the Constitution of the United States of America, and is therefore a power reserved to the people pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, and to the several states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The state of Idaho hereby exercises its sovereign power to declare the public policy of the state of Idaho regarding the right of all persons residing in the state of Idaho in choosing the mode of securing health care services free from the imposition of penalties, or the threat thereof, by the federal government of the United States of America relating thereto.
  2. It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America.
  3. The policy stated herein shall not be applied to impair any right of contract related to the provision of health care services to any person or group.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9003, as added by 2010, ch. 46, § 1, p. 84.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Idaho Law Review.

Idaho Law Review. — Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Nullification and the Question of Gubernatorial Executive Power in Idaho, Comment. 49 Idaho L. Rev. 659 (2013).

§ 39-9004. Enforcement.

  1. No public official, employee, or agent of the state of Idaho or any of its political subdivisions, shall act to impose, collect, enforce, or effectuate any penalty in the state of Idaho that violates the public policy set forth in section 39-9003(2), Idaho Code.
  2. The attorney general shall take such action as is provided in section 67-1401(15), Idaho Code, in the defense or prosecution of rights protected under this act.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9004, as added by 2010, ch. 46, § 1, p. 84.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act”, in subsection (2), refers to S.L. 2010, ch. 46, which is codified as§§ 39-9001 to 39-9004 and 67-1401.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Idaho Law Review.

Idaho Law Review. — Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Nullification and the Question of Gubernatorial Executive Power in Idaho, Comment. 49 Idaho L. Rev. 659 (2013).

Chapter 91 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTERS

Sec.

§ 39-9101. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Behavioral Health Community Crisis Centers Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9101, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9102. Declaration of policy and intent.

  1. Citizens of Idaho experiencing a behavioral health crisis are often incarcerated, hospitalized or treated in hospital emergency departments because an appropriate level of care to meet their needs is not available.
  2. Hospital emergency departments, jails and law enforcement agencies in Idaho have become the default providers of crisis intervention to Idaho citizens with behavioral health disorders. Extensive resources are being unnecessarily expended by law enforcement and hospitals on behavioral health crisis services.
  3. It is the policy of this state that citizens with behavioral health disorders should not be needlessly incarcerated when no crime has been perpetrated or the crime is of a minor nature arising from a behavioral health disorder, crisis or incident.
  4. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that behavioral health community crisis centers, hereinafter referred to as crisis centers, be developed and operated, as funding is appropriated, to provide the appropriate level of care to meet the needs of Idahoans experiencing behavioral health crises.
  5. The crisis centers shall be available on a voluntary basis to individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis. The centers shall provide transitional de-escalation, stabilization and community referral services only, and the centers shall not serve as inpatient or residential facilities.
  6. This chapter and any subsequent administrative rules shall not assume authority over other community efforts to assist Idahoans experiencing behavioral health crises.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9102, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9103. Definitions.

  1. “Behavioral health” means an integrated or combined system for evaluation and treatment of mental health and substance use disorders.
  2. “Behavioral health community crisis center” or “crisis center” means a voluntary outpatient facility operated twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week and three hundred sixty-five (365) days a year to provide evaluation, intervention and referral for individuals experiencing a crisis due to a behavioral health condition. The facility may not provide services to a client for more than twenty-three (23) hours and fifty-nine (59) minutes in a single episode of care.
  3. “Department” means the department of health and welfare.
  4. “Director” means the director of the department of health and welfare.
  5. “Region” means the administrative regions as defined by the department of health and welfare. Two (2) or more regions may consolidate for the purposes of this chapter. For the purposes of this chapter, regions will be consistent with judicial districts.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9103, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9104. Governance of behavioral health community crisis centers.

  1. Crisis centers shall be directed by a board of directors. The board of directors shall guide the organization, implementation and operation of the crisis center.
  2. The board shall consist of no fewer than five (5) members and shall include, at a minimum, a local behavioral health consumer, a physician, law enforcement and a county commissioner from within the region.
  3. If the organization contracted for operation of the crisis centers is already governed by a board of directors, the board shall establish an advisory committee to advise it on the organization, implementation and operation of the crisis center.
  4. If the organization contracted for operation of the crisis center develops an advisory committee, the committee shall have no fewer than five (5) members and shall include a local behavioral health consumer, a physician, law enforcement and a county commissioner from within the region.
  5. The term of board or advisory committee membership, appointment authority for members and organizational structures shall be guided by bylaws, articles of incorporation or other policy directives established by the entity operating the facility.
  6. The department, as the state behavioral health authority established by section 39-3123, Idaho Code, shall oversee the crisis centers to ensure compliance with the intent of this chapter, application of the model, associated administrative rules and patient safety. The department shall be authorized to perform annual audits of crisis centers as necessary to fulfill its oversight responsibility.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9104, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9105. Behavioral health community crisis center evaluation.

Each crisis center shall annually evaluate the effectiveness and cost efficacy of its center and submit a report of findings to the department of health and welfare by August 1 of each year. The department shall annually report findings of the crisis center evaluations to germane committees of the Idaho legislature.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9105, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9106. Behavioral health community crisis center funding.

Subject to appropriation by the legislature, the department shall be responsible for administering, allocating and distributing all appropriations from the legislature for crisis centers.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9106, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9107. Community contribution.

Communities that receive state funding to establish a crisis center shall, to the maximum extent possible, contribute financial or in-kind support to the development and operation of the crisis center.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9107, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9108. Services to be nondiscriminatory — Fees.

No regional crisis center shall refuse service to any person because of race, color, religion or because of inability to pay. Persons receiving services may be charged fees for the services they receive. The crisis center fee determination schedule shall be approved by the department of health and welfare. Fees collected by the crisis centers shall become part of their budget and utilized at the direction of the crisis center’s board or governance committee.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9108, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

§ 39-9109. Rulemaking authority.

The director is authorized to promulgate rules necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter that are consistent with its provisions.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9109, as added by 2014, ch. 131, § 1, p. 365.

Chapter 92 IDAHO DIRECT PRIMARY CARE ACT

Sec.

§ 39-9201. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Direct Primary Care Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9201, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9202. Public policy.

It is the policy of the state of Idaho to promote personal responsibility for health care and the cost-effective delivery of medical services by encouraging innovative use of direct patient-provider practices for primary medical care. Direct patient-provider practices utilize a model of periodic fees for provider access and medical management over time, rather than simply a fee for visit or procedure service model. Some patients and individual primary care providers may wish to establish direct agreements with one another as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service care financed through health insurance. The purpose of this act is to confirm that direct patient-provider agreements that satisfy the provisions of this chapter do not constitute insurance.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9202, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in the last sentence refers to S.L. 2015, Chapter 291, which is codified as§§ 39-9201 to 39-9209. The reference probably should be to “this chapter,” being chapter 92, title 39, Idaho Code.

§ 39-9203. Definitions.

For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:

  1. “Direct fee” means an agreed-upon fee charged by a primary care provider as consideration for providing and being available to provide direct primary care services described in a direct primary care agreement.
  2. “Direct primary care agreement” means a written contract between a primary care provider and an individual patient or a patient’s representative in which the primary care provider agrees to provide direct primary care services to the patient over a specified period of time for payment of a direct fee.
  3. “Direct primary care services” means those services that a primary care provider is licensed or otherwise legally authorized to provide and may include, but are not limited to, such services as screening, assessment, diagnosis and treatment for the purpose of promoting health; detection, management and care of disease or injury; or routine preventive or diagnostic dental treatment. Such services may be provided in a primary care provider’s office, the patient’s home or other locations where a patient visit with the primary care provider needs to occur.
  4. “Patient” means a person who is entitled to receive direct primary care services under a direct care agreement.
  5. “Patient’s representative” means a person identified in section 39-4504(1)(a) through (g), Idaho Code.
  6. “Primary care provider” means a natural person licensed or otherwise legally authorized to provide health care services in the state of Idaho in the field of pediatrics, family medicine, internal medicine or dentistry, who provides such services either alone or in professional association with others in a form and within a scope permitted by such licensure or legal authorization for the provision of such services, and who enters into a direct primary care agreement.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9203, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9204. Direct primary care agreement provisions.

  1. A direct primary care agreement shall identify:
    1. The primary care provider and the patient;
    2. The general scope of services as well as the specific services to be provided by the primary care provider;
    3. The location or locations where services are to be provided;
    4. The amount of the direct fee and the time interval at which it is to be paid; and
    5. The term of the agreement and the conditions upon which it may be terminated by the primary care provider. The agreement shall be terminable at will by written notice from the patient to the primary care provider.
  2. If a party provides written notice of termination of the direct primary care agreement, the primary care provider shall refund to the patient all unearned direct fees within thirty (30) days following the notice of termination.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9204, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9205. Insurance billing prohibited.

Neither the patient nor the primary care provider shall submit a bill to an insurer for the services provided under a direct primary care agreement.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9205, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9206. Agreements not classified as insurance.

Direct primary care agreements are not subject to regulation as insurance under title 41, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9206, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9207. Disclaimer.

A direct primary care agreement shall include the following disclaimer: “This agreement does not provide health insurance coverage, including the minimal essential coverage required by applicable federal law. It provides only the services described herein. It is recommended that health care insurance be obtained to cover medical services not provided for under this direct primary care agreement.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9207, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9208. Restrictions on transfer.

A direct primary care agreement may not be sold or transferred by the primary care provider without the written consent of the patient and may be transferred only to another primary care provider. A direct primary care agreement may not be sold to a group, employer or group of subscribers because it is an individual agreement between a primary care provider and a patient. These limitations do not prohibit the presentation of marketing materials to groups of potential patients or their representatives but said marketing materials are subject to chapter 6, title 48, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9208, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

§ 39-9209. Effect of this chapter.

This chapter does not prohibit health care providers who are not primary care providers from entering into agreements with patients to the extent such agreements do not violate the provisions of title 41, Idaho Code.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9209, as added by 2015, ch. 291, § 1, p. 1164.

Chapter 93 IDAHO UNBORN INFANTS DIGNITY ACT

Sec.

__________

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

S.L. 2016, Chapter 168 and S.L. 2016, Chapter 368 each enacted a new chapter 93 in title 39 of the Idaho Code. S.L. 2016, Chapter 368 remained as enacted. S.L. 2016, Chapter 168 was redesignated by the compiler, through the use of brackets as chapter 94, title 39, Idaho Code. The redesignation of S.L. 2016, chapter 168 was made permanent by S.L. 2017, ch. 58, § 19.

__________

§ 39-9301. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Idaho Unborn Infants Dignity Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9301, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9302. Legislative findings and purpose.

  1. The legislature of the state of Idaho finds that:
    1. Deceased unborn infants deserve the same respect and dignity as other deceased human beings.
    2. It continues to be the public policy of the state of Idaho to promote live childbirth over abortion. Permitting the sale, transfer, distribution or donation of the bodily remains of aborted infants, particularly for pecuniary gain, and the use of the remains of aborted infants for experimentation undermine that public policy as well as proper ethical standards of medical conduct.
    3. It is contrary to the public policy of the state of Idaho for an individual to become pregnant for the purpose of aborting an unborn infant and thereafter selling, transferring, distributing or donating the unborn infant’s bodily remains for experimentation or other use.
  2. Based on the findings in subsection (1) of this section, the purpose of this chapter is to:
    1. Prohibit the sale, transfer, distribution or other unlawful disposition of an unborn infant or the bodily remains of an aborted infant;
    2. Prohibit the use of bodily remains of aborted infants for experimentation;
    3. Ensure that the bodily remains of unborn infants whose death resulted from an occurrence other than abortion are not sold, transferred or distributed for experimentation without the mother’s informed, written consent; and
    4. In accordance with the provisions of this chapter, prohibit all Idaho institutions of higher education that receive public moneys from engaging in medical research using organs or tissue, including human embryonic stem cells, obtained from aborted infants.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9302, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9303. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Aborted infant” means a deceased unborn infant whose death was caused by abortion.
  2. “Abortion” has the same meaning as provided in section 18-604, Idaho Code.
  3. “Bodily remains” means the physical remains, body parts or tissue of a deceased unborn infant who has been expelled or extracted from the infant’s mother.
  4. “Experiment” or “experimentation” means the use of bodily remains, including embryonic stem cells, or the use of an unborn infant intended to be aborted, in any trial, test, procedure or observation carried out with the goal of verifying, refuting or establishing the validity of a hypothesis, but does not include:
    1. Diagnostic or remedial tests, procedures or observations that have the purpose of promoting the life or health of an unborn infant or of the mother of an unborn infant; or
    2. Pathological study.
  5. “Fetal death” means the death of an unborn infant prior to expulsion or extraction from the unborn infant’s mother, provided that the unborn infant reached a stage of development such that there are cartilaginous structures or fetal or skeletal parts. The unborn infant’s death is indicated by the fact that, after such expulsion or extraction, the unborn infant does not breathe or show any other evidence of life such as a heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord or definite movement of voluntary muscles.
  6. “Final disposition” means the burial, cremation or other legal disposition of a deceased unborn infant.
  7. “Miscarriage” means the spontaneous or accidental death of an unborn infant in utero other than by induced abortion or stillbirth. The infant’s death is indicated by the fact that, after the expulsion or extraction of the unborn infant, the infant does not breathe or show any other evidence of life such as a heartbeat, pulsation of the umbilical cord or definite movement of voluntary muscles.
  8. “Pathological” means the examination of body tissue for diagnostic or forensic purposes and any related activities necessary to perform such a study. The term “study” includes any study or test, genetic or otherwise, to determine paternity or the cause of death.
  9. “Stillbirth” has the same meaning as provided in section 39-241, Idaho Code.
  10. “Unborn infant” has the same meaning as “fetus” and “unborn child” as provided in section 18-604, Idaho Code.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9303, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9304. Release of remains for final disposition.

In every instance of fetal death involving miscarriage or stillbirth, the individual in charge of the institution where the bodily remains of the deceased unborn infant were expelled or extracted, or the individual’s designee, shall notify the mother or the mother’s authorized representative that the mother has a right to direct the receipt and disposition of her deceased unborn infant’s bodily remains. Upon request by the mother or her authorized representative, the institution shall make arrangements for the release of the bodily remains to the mother or her authorized representative for final disposition in accordance with applicable law.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9304, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9305. Miscarriage certificates.

The state registrar of vital statistics shall establish such forms and procedures as are necessary to file miscarriage certificates for unborn infants whose death occurred as a result of miscarriage. The filing of a miscarriage certificate shall be voluntary at the request of the unborn infant’s parent or parents and shall be filed only if the miscarriage is certified by a physician, a physician’s assistant or an advanced practice registered nurse.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9305, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State registrar of vital statistics,§ 39-243.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9306. Prohibitions.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no person shall knowingly sell, transfer, distribute, donate, accept, use or attempt to use the body or bodily remains of an aborted infant.
  2. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no person shall knowingly aid or abet any such sale, transfer, distribution, other unlawful disposition, acceptance, use or attempted use of the body or bodily remains of an aborted infant.
  3. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no person or public institution operating in Idaho shall knowingly use an unborn infant or the bodily remains or embryonic stem cells of an aborted infant in animal or human research, experimentation or study, or for transplantation, except:
    1. For diagnostic or remedial procedures that have the purpose of promoting the life or health of the unborn infant or the unborn infant’s mother;
    2. For pathological study; or
    3. For the applicable materials used in research projects and grants that were undertaken or made before July 1, 2016.
  4. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no person shall knowingly experiment upon an unborn infant who is intended to be aborted unless the experimentation is therapeutic to the unborn infant.
  5. The terms “transfer,” “accept” and “acceptance” as used in this section do not apply to the transfer or acceptance of the body or bodily remains of an aborted infant for the sole purpose of lawfully disposing of the body or bodily remains of the aborted infant.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9306, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078; am. 2017, ch. 298, § 1, p. 796.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 298, rewrote paragraph (3)(c), which formerly read: “For the completion of research projects and grants that were undertaken or made before July 1, 2016. Such projects and grants shall not be extended or renewed”.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9307. Informed consent required for certain experimentation.

Bodily remains of an unborn infant whose death occurred as a result of miscarriage or stillbirth may be used for animal or human research, experimentation, study or transplantation only if the mother of the deceased unborn infant makes a signed, written statement declaring that:

  1. The mother donates the specific bodily remains for animal or human research, experimentation, study or transplantation;
  2. The donation is made without any restriction regarding the identity of individuals who may be the recipients of transplantations of any bodily remains;
  3. The mother has not been informed of the identity of any individuals who may be recipients of transplantations of bodily remains;
  4. The mother understands her right to obtain the bodily remains for final disposition in accordance with the provisions of this act; and
  5. Full disclosure has been provided to the mother with regard to the attending physician’s interest, if any, in the research, experimentation, study or transplantation to be conducted with specific bodily remains.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9307, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” in subsection (4) refers to S.L. 2016, Chapter 368, which is codified as§§ 39-9301 to 39-9311.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9308. Criminal penalties.

  1. A person who violates section 39-9306(1) or (2), Idaho Code, shall be guilty of a felony for each violation and shall be subject to a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), imprisonment in the state prison for a term not to exceed five (5) years, or both.
  2. A person who violates section 39-9306(3) or (4), Idaho Code, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed six (6) months, or both. Any person who pleads guilty to or is found guilty of a violation of section 39-9306(3) or (4), Idaho Code, who previously has pled guilty to or been found guilty of a violation of either such subsection, notwithstanding the form of the judgment or withheld judgment, shall be guilty of a felony and shall be subject to a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), imprisonment in the state prison not to exceed one (1) year, or both.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9308, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9309. Duties of the attorney general and prosecutors.

The Idaho attorney general or the appropriate prosecuting attorney may initiate actions or proceedings for a violation of any criminal provisions in this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9309, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Attorney general,§ 67-1401 et seq.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9310. Civil and administrative actions.

  1. In addition to the remedies available under the statutory or common laws of Idaho, failure to comply with the requirements of section 39-9306, Idaho Code, shall provide a basis for recovery of damages for the parent of an unborn infant or, if the mother is a minor, for the parent or guardian of the mother of an unborn infant, for the unlawful disposition of or experimentation on an unborn infant or on bodily remains.
  2. Any conviction of a health care provider for failure to comply with the requirements of section 39-9306, Idaho Code, shall result in the suspension of such provider’s license for a period of at least one (1) year, and such license shall be reinstated after that time only under such conditions as the Idaho board of medicine shall require to ensure compliance with this chapter.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9310, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

§ 39-9311. Construction.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to create or recognize a right to abortion.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9311, as added by 2016, ch. 368, § 1, p. 1078.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

Section 2 of S.L. 2016, ch. 368 provided: “Severability. The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.”

Chapter 94 RIGHT TO TRY ACT

Sec.

__________

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

S.L. 2016, Chapter 168 and S.L. 2016, Chapter 368 each enacted a new chapter 93 in title 39 of the Idaho Code. S.L. 2016, Chapter 368 remained as enacted. S.L. 2016, Chapter 168 was redesignated by the compiler, through the use of brackets, as chapter 94, title 39, Idaho Code. The redesignation was made permanent by S.L. 2017, ch. 58, § 19.

__________

§ 39-9401. Short title.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Right to Try Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9301, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9301.

§ 39-9402. Legislative intent.

It is the intent of the legislature to provide the opportunity for terminally ill patients to have access to certain investigational treatments without requiring another party, including a physician, manufacturer, insurer or government agency, to offer, provide or pay for such treatments. By enacting this chapter, the legislature intends only to permit these treatments to terminally ill patients in Idaho. It is not the intent of the legislature to create an obligation but to ensure that all persons or parties availing themselves of this chapter do so voluntarily. Due to the experimental nature of these treatments, it is further the intent of the legislature to protect physicians and other parties from civil, criminal or professional liability relating to the treatments.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9302, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9302.

§ 39-9403. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Eligible patient” or “patient” means an individual who has a terminal illness and has:
    1. Considered all other treatment options currently approved by the United States food and drug administration;
    2. Received a recommendation from the patient’s treating physician for an investigational drug, biological product or device for purposes related to the terminal illness;
    3. Given written, informed consent for the use of the recommended investigational drug, biological product or device; and
    4. Received documentation from the eligible patient’s treating physician that the eligible patient meets the requirements of this subsection.
  2. “Investigational drug, biological product or device” means a drug, biological product or device that has successfully completed phase 1 of a clinical trial but has not yet been approved for general use by the United States food and drug administration and remains under investigation in a United States food and drug administration-approved clinical trial.
  3. “Terminal illness” means a progressive disease or medical or surgical condition that:
    1. Entails functional impairment that significantly impacts the patient’s activities of daily living;
    2. Is not considered by a treating physician to be reversible even with administration of current United States food and drug administration-approved and available treatments; and
    3. Without life-sustaining procedures, will soon result in death.
  4. “Written, informed consent” means a written document that is signed by the eligible patient and, if the patient is a minor, a parent or legal guardian, which document is attested to by the patient’s physician and a witness and that includes the following:
    1. An explanation of the currently approved products and treatments for the disease or condition from which the patient suffers;
    2. An attestation that the patient concurs with the patient’s physician in believing that all currently approved and conventionally recognized treatments are unlikely to prolong the patient’s life;
    3. Clear identification of the specific proposed investigational drug, biological product or device that the patient is seeking to use;
    4. A description of the potentially best and worst outcomes of using the investigational drug, biological product or device and a realistic description of the most likely outcome. The description shall include the possibility that new, unanticipated, different or worse symptoms might result and that death could be hastened by the proposed treatment. The description shall be based on the physician’s knowledge of the proposed treatment in conjunction with an awareness of the patient’s condition;
    5. A statement that the patient’s health plan or third-party administrator and provider are not obligated to pay for any care or treatments consequent to the use of the investigational drug, biological product or device unless specifically required to do so by law or contract;
    6. A statement that the patient’s eligibility for hospice care might be withdrawn if the patient begins curative treatment with the investigational drug, biological product or device and that care may be reinstated if the treatment ends and the patient meets hospice eligibility requirements; and (g) A statement that the patient understands that the patient is responsible for all expenses consequent to the use of the investigational drug, biological product or device and that this liability extends to the patient’s estate unless a contract between the patient and the manufacturer of the drug, biological product or device states otherwise.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9303, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9303.

§ 39-9404. Investigational drugs — Right to try and provide.

  1. An eligible patient may request, and a manufacturer may make available to an eligible patient under the supervision of the patient’s treating physician, the manufacturer’s investigational drug, biological product or device, which drug, product or device shall be clearly labeled as investigational; provided however, that this chapter does not require that a manufacturer make available an investigational drug, biological product or device to an eligible patient.
  2. A manufacturer may:
    1. Provide an investigational drug, biological product or device to an eligible patient without receiving compensation; or
    2. Require an eligible patient to pay the costs associated with the manufacture of the investigational drug, biological product or device.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9304, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9304.

Federal References.

For further information on the United States food and drug administration, see http://www.fda.gov .

§ 39-9405. No coverage obligation.

  1. This chapter does not expand the coverage required of an insurer under the laws of this state.
  2. A health plan, third-party administrator or government agency may, but is not required to, provide coverage for the cost of an investigational drug, biological product or device or the cost of services related to the use of an investigational drug, biological product or device.
  3. This chapter does not require any health plan, third-party administrator or government agency to pay costs associated with the use of an investigational drug, biological product or device.
  4. This chapter does not require a hospital or facility licensed in this state to provide new or additional services unless such services are approved by the hospital or facility.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9305, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9305.

§ 39-9406. Heirs not liable for treatment debt.

If a patient dies while being treated by an investigational drug, biological product or device under the terms of this chapter, the patient’s heirs are not liable for any outstanding debt related to the treatment or lack of insurance due to the treatment.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9306, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9306.

§ 39-9407. Prohibitions.

  1. A licensing board or disciplinary body of this state shall not revoke, fail to renew, suspend or take any action against a health care provider’s license based solely on the provider’s recommendations to an eligible patient regarding access to or treatment with an investigational drug, biological product or device as allowed under this act.
  2. An entity responsible for medicare certification shall not take action against a health care provider’s medicare certification based solely on the health care provider’s recommendation that a patient have access to an investigational drug, biological product or device as allowed under this act.
  3. An official, employee or agent of this state shall not block or attempt to block an eligible patient’s access to an investigational drug, biological product or device as allowed under this act.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9307, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9307.

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” at the end of subsections (2) and (3) refers to S.L. 2016, Chapter 168, which is codified as§§ 39-9401 to 39-9409.

§ 39-9408. Limitations.

  1. This chapter does not create a private cause of action against a manufacturer of an investigational drug, biological product or device or against a physician or any other person or entity involved in the care of an eligible patient using an investigational drug, biological product or device for any harm done to the eligible patient resulting from the investigational drug, biological product or device, provided that the manufacturer, physician, or person or entity has exercised reasonable care and complied in good faith with the terms of this chapter.
  2. This chapter does not create a private cause of action against a treating physician who refuses to recommend an investigational drug, biological product or device to a patient with a terminal illness.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9308, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9308.

§ 39-9409. Mandatory coverage not affected.

This chapter does not affect any mandatory health care coverage for participation in clinical trials provided elsewhere by law.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9309, as added by 2016, ch. 168, § 1, p. 466; am. and redesig. 2017, ch. 58, § 19, p. 91.

STATUTORY NOTES

Amendments.

The 2017 amendment, by ch. 58, redesignated this section from§ 39-9309.

Chapter 95 ABORTION COMPLICATIONS REPORTING ACT

Sec.

§ 39-9501. Short title.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Abortion Complications Reporting Act.”

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9501, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The term “this act” refers to S.L. 2018, Chapter 225, which is codified as§§ 39-9501 through 39-9509, 54-1413, and 54-1814. The term should probably read “this chapter,” being chapter 95, title 39, Idaho Code.

§ 39-9502. Legislative findings and purpose.

  1. The legislature of the state of Idaho asserts and finds that:
    1. The state “has legitimate interests from the outset of pregnancy in protecting the health of women,” as found by the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey ;
    2. Specifically, the state “has a legitimate concern with the health of women who undergo abortions,” as found by the United States Supreme Court in Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reproductive Health, Inc. ;
    3. Surgical abortion is an invasive procedure that can cause severe physical and psychological complications for women, both short-term and long-term, including, but not limited to, uterine perforation, cervical perforation, infection, bleeding, hemorrhage, blood clots, failure to actually terminate the pregnancy, incomplete abortion, retained tissue, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometritis, missed ectopic pregnancy, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, renal failure, metabolic disorder, shock, embolism, coma, placenta previa in subsequent pregnancies, preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies, free fluid in the abdomen, adverse reactions to anesthesia and other drugs, an increased risk for developing breast cancer, psychological or emotional complications such as depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety and sleeping disorders, and death;
    4. To facilitate reliable scientific studies and research on the safety and efficacy of abortion, it is essential that the medical and public health communities have access to accurate information both on the abortion procedure and on complications resulting from abortion;
    5. Abortion “record keeping and reporting provisions that are reasonably directed to the preservation of maternal health and that properly respect a patient’s confidentiality and privacy are permissible,” according to the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Danforth ;
    6. Abortion and complication reporting provisions do not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. Specifically, the “collection of information with respect to actual patients is a vital element of medical research, and so it cannot be said that the requirements serve no purpose other than to make abortions more difficult,” as found by the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey ;
    7. The use of RU-486 as part of a chemical abortion can cause significant medical risks including, but not limited to, abdominal pain, cramping, vomiting, headache, fatigue, uterine hemorrhage, infections and pelvic inflammatory disease;
    8. The risk of abortion complications increases with advancing gestational age;
    9. Studies document that increased rates of complications, including incomplete abortion, occur even within the gestational limit approved by the federal food and drug administration (FDA);
    10. In July 2011, the FDA reported two thousand two hundred seven (2,207) adverse events after women used RU-486 for abortions. Among these events were fourteen (14) deaths, six hundred twelve (612) hospitalizations, three hundred thirty-nine (339) blood transfusions, and two hundred fifty-six (256) infections, including forty-eight (48) severe infections;
    11. The adverse event reports systems relied upon by the FDA have limitations and typically detect only a small proportion of events that actually occur. Furthermore, the FDA has failed to publicly release data since 2011, and it is necessary to develop a state-based information system in the wake of court rulings legalizing telemedicine abortions; and ( l ) To promote its interest in maternal health and life, the state of Idaho maintains an interest in:
      1. Collecting information on all complications from all abortions performed in the state; and
      2. Compiling statistical reports based on abortion complication information collected pursuant to this chapter for future scientific studies and public health research.
  2. Based on the findings in subsection (1) of this section, it is the purpose of this chapter to promote the health and safety of women by adding to the sum of medical and public health knowledge through the compilation of relevant data on all abortions performed in the state, as well as on all medical complications and maternal deaths resulting from these abortions.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9502, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The abbreviation enclosed in parentheses so appeared in the law as enacted.

For more information on the federal food and drug administration, see https://www.fda.gov .

§ 39-9503. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Abortion” shall have the same meaning as provided in section 18-502, Idaho Code.
  2. “Complication” means any of the following, if it constitutes an abnormal or a deviant process or event arising from the performance or completion of an abortion:
    1. Uterine perforation or injury to the uterus;
    2. Injury or damage to any organ;
    3. Cervical perforation or injury to the cervix;
    4. Infection;
    5. Heavy or excessive bleeding;
    6. Hemorrhage;
    7. Blood clots;
    8. Blood transfusion;
    9. Failure to actually terminate the pregnancy;
    10. Incomplete abortion or retained tissue;
    11. Weakness, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea that lasts more than twenty-four (24) hours;
    12. Pain or cramps that do not improve with medication;
    13. A fever of one hundred and four-tenths (100.4) degrees or higher for more than twenty-four (24) hours;
    14. Hemolytic reaction due to the administration of ABO-incompatible blood or blood products;
    15. Hypoglycemia where onset occurs while the patient is being cared for in the abortion facility;
    16. Pelvic inflammatory disease;
    17. Endometritis;
    18. Missed ectopic pregnancy;
    19. Cardiac arrest;
    20. Respiratory arrest;
    21. Renal failure;
    22. Metabolic disorder;
    23. Shock;
    24. Embolism;
    25. Coma;
    26. Placenta previa or preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies;
    27. Free fluid in the abdomen;
    28. Adverse or allergic reaction to anesthesia or other drugs;
    29. Subsequent development of breast cancer;
    30. Death;
    31. Any psychological or emotional condition reported by the patient, such as depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety or a sleeping disorder; or
    32. Any other adverse event as defined by the federal food and drug administration criteria provided in the medwatch reporting system.
  3. “Department” means the state department of health and welfare.
  4. “Facility” means any public or private hospital, clinic, center, medical school, medical training institution, health care facility, physician’s office, infirmary, dispensary, ambulatory surgical center or other institution or location where medical care is provided to any person.
  5. “Hospital” means any institution licensed as a hospital pursuant to chapter 13, title 39, Idaho Code.
  6. “Medical practitioner” means a licensed medical care provider capable of making a diagnosis within the scope of such provider’s license.
  7. “Pregnant” or “pregnancy” means the reproductive condition of having an unborn child in the uterus.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9503, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509; am. 2019, ch. 50, § 1, p. 135.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

Idaho department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 50, in subsection (2), rewrote the introductory paragraph, which formerly read: “Complication’ means an abnormal or a deviant process or event arising from the performance or completion of an abortion, as follows”, deleted former paragraph (k), which read: “The need for follow-up care, surgery or an aspiration procedure for incomplete abortion or retained tissue”, deleted former paragraph (q), which read: “Physical injury associated with care received in the abortion facility”, deleted former paragraphs (ff) to (hh), which read: “(ff) Inability, refusal or unwillingness to have follow-up care, surgery or an aspiration procedure following an incomplete abortion or retained tissue, (gg) Inability, refusal or unwillingness to have a follow-up visit, (hh) Referral to or care provided by a hospital, emergency department or urgent care clinic or department”, and redesignated the remaining paragraphs accordingly.

Compiler’s Notes.

For more information on the federal food and drug administration, see https://www.fda.gov .

For more information on the FDA’s MedWatch reporting system, see https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/default.htm .

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2019, ch. 50 declared an emergency. Approved. March 7, 2019.

§ 39-9504. Abortion complication reporting.

  1. Every hospital, licensed health care facility or individual medical practitioner shall file a written report with the department regarding each woman who comes under the hospital’s, health care facility’s or medical practitioner’s care and receives treatment for any item listed in section 39-9503(2), Idaho Code, that the attending medical practitioner has reason to believe, in the practitioner’s reasonable medical judgment, constitutes an abnormal or a deviant process or event arising from the performance or completion of an abortion. Such reports shall be completed by the hospital, health care facility or attending medical practitioner who treated the woman, signed by the attending medical practitioner and transmitted to the department within ninety (90) days from the last date of treatment or other care or consultation for the complication.
  2. Every hospital, licensed health care facility or individual medical practitioner required to submit a complication report shall attempt to ascertain and shall report on the following:
    1. The age and race of the woman;
    2. The woman’s state and county of residence;
    3. The number of previous pregnancies, number of live births and number of previous abortions of the woman;
    4. The date the abortion was performed and the date that the abortion was completed, as well as the gestational age of the fetus, as defined in section 18-604, Idaho Code, and the methods used;
    5. Identification of the physician who performed the abortion, the facility where the abortion was performed and the referring medical practitioner, agency or service, if any;
    6. The specific complication, as that term is defined in section 39-9503(2), Idaho Code, including, where applicable, the location of the complication in the woman’s body, the date on which the complication occurred and whether there were any preexisting medical conditions that would potentially complicate pregnancy or the abortion;
    7. Whether any post-abortion follow-up visit was scheduled or required by the abortion provider and, if so, whether the woman refused or failed to attend such follow-up visit;
    8. Whether the woman was referred to a hospital, emergency department, or urgent care clinic or department for treatment for any item listed in section 39-9503(2), Idaho Code;
    9. Any follow-up care, surgery, or aspiration procedure performed because of incomplete abortion or retained tissue; and
    10. Whether the woman received treatment from any other medical practitioner for the specific complication and, if so, when such previous treatment occurred, and the medical practitioner or practitioners who provided the treatment.
  3. Reports required under this section shall not contain:
    1. The name of the woman;
    2. Common identifiers such as the woman’s social security number or motor vehicle operator’s license number; or
    3. Other information or identifiers that would make it possible to identify, in any manner or under any circumstances, a woman who has obtained an abortion and subsequently suffered an abortion-related complication. (4) The department shall prepare a comprehensive annual statistical report for the legislature based on the data gathered from reports under this section. The statistical report shall not lead to the disclosure of the identity of any medical practitioner, or any person filing a report under this section nor of a woman about whom a report is filed. The aggregate data shall also be made independently available to the public by the department in a downloadable format.

(5) The department shall summarize aggregate data from the reports required under this chapter and submit the data to the federal centers for disease control and prevention for the purpose of inclusion in the annual vital statistics report. The aggregate data shall also be made independently available to the public by the department in a downloadable format.

(6) Reports filed pursuant to this section shall not be deemed public records and shall remain confidential, except that disclosure may be made to law enforcement officials upon an order of a court after application showing good cause. The court may condition disclosure of the information upon any appropriate safeguards it may impose.

(7) Absent a valid court order or judicial subpoena, the department, any other state department, agency or office, or any employees or contractor thereof shall not compare data concerning abortions or abortion complications maintained in an electronic or other information system file with data in any other electronic or other information system, a comparison of which could result in identifying, in any manner or under any circumstances, a woman obtaining or seeking to obtain an abortion.

(8) Statistical information that may reveal the identity of a woman obtaining or seeking to obtain an abortion shall not be maintained by the department, any other state department, agency or office, or any employee or contractor thereof.

(9) The department or an employee or contractor of the department shall not disclose to a person or entity outside the department the reports or the contents of the reports required under this section in a manner or fashion that would permit the person or entity to whom the report is disclosed to identify, in any way or under any circumstances, the woman who is the subject of the report.

(10) Original copies of all reports filed under this section shall be available to the state board of medicine for use in the performance of its official duties.

(11) The department shall communicate this reporting requirement to all medical professional organizations, medical practitioners, hospitals, emergency departments, abortion facilities, clinics, ambulatory surgical facilities, and other health care facilities operating in the state.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9504, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509; am. 2019, ch. 50, § 2, p. 135.

STATUTORY NOTES

Cross References.

State board of medicine,§ 54-1805.

Amendments.

The 2019 amendment, by ch. 50, rewrote the first sentence in subsection (1), which formerly read: “Every hospital, licensed health care facility or individual medical practitioner shall file a written report with the department regarding each woman who comes under the hospital’s, health care facility’s or medical practitioner’s care and reports any complication, requires medical treatment or suffers death that the attending medical practitioner has reason to believe, in the practitioner’s reasonable medical judgment, is a direct or an indirect result of an abortion”; and added paragraphs (g) to (j) in subsection (2).

Effective Dates.

Section 3 of S.L. 2019, ch. 50 declared an emergency. Approved. March 7, 2019.

§ 39-9505. Reporting forms.

The department shall create the forms required by this chapter within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this chapter. Such forms shall provide for the reporting of information required by section 39-9504(2), Idaho Code. No provision of this chapter requiring the reporting of information on forms published by the department shall be applicable until ten (10) days after the requisite forms are first created or until the effective date of this chapter, whichever is later.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9505, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

STATUTORY NOTES

Compiler’s Notes.

The phrase “the effective date of this chapter” in the first and last sentences refers to the effective date of S.L. 2018, Chapter 225, which was effective July 1, 2018.

§ 39-9506. Penalties and professional sanctions.

  1. Any person who willfully delivers or discloses to the department any report, record or information required pursuant to this chapter and known by him or her to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
  2. Any person who willfully discloses any information obtained from reports filed pursuant to this chapter, other than the disclosure authorized by this chapter or otherwise authorized by law, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
  3. Any person required under this chapter to file a report, keep any records or supply any information, who willfully fails to file such report, keep such records or supply such information at the time or times required by law or rule, is:
    1. Guilty of unprofessional conduct, and his or her professional license is subject to discipline in accordance with procedures governing his or her license; and
    2. Subject to a civil fine of five hundred dollars ($500) for each instance of failure to report, if such person is a medical practitioner responsible for filing an adverse reaction report with the department.
  4. In addition to the above penalties, any facility that willfully violates any of the requirements of this chapter shall:
    1. In the case of a first violation, be subject to a civil fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each instance of failure to report;
    2. Have its license suspended for a period of six (6) months for the second violation; and
    3. Have its license suspended for a period of one (1) year upon a third or subsequent violation.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9506, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

§ 39-9507. Construction.

  1. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as creating or recognizing a right to abortion.
  2. It is not the intention of this chapter to make lawful an abortion that is currently unlawful.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9507, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

§ 39-9508. Right of intervention.

The legislature, by concurrent resolution, may appoint one (1) or more of its members who sponsored or co-sponsored this chapter in his or her official capacity, or other member or members if the original sponsors and co-sponsors are no longer serving, to intervene as a matter of right in any case in which the constitutionality of this law is challenged.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9508, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

§ 39-9509. Severability.

The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable, and if any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9509, as added by 2018, ch. 225, § 1, p. 509.

Chapter 96 MATERNAL MORTALITY REVIEW

Sec.

§ 39-9601. Legislative findings. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

The legislature of the state of Idaho finds that:

  1. According to the world health organization, maternal mortality rates worldwide dropped 44% between 1990 and 2015, but increased in the United States;
  2. The institute for health metrics and evaluation at the university of Washington found the United States has a maternal death rate of 26.4 per 100,000 live births, compared to other countries such as the United Kingdom (9.2), Germany (9), France (7.8), Canada (7.3), Spain (5.6), Italy (4.2), and Finland (3.8);
  3. In 2018, Idaho ranked thirty-first out of fifty states in rates of maternal mortality, according to the centers for disease control and prevention. Per Idaho vital statistics, Idaho’s maternal death rate in 2017 was 27.1 deaths per 100,000 live births;
  4. Maternal deaths are a serious public health concern and have a tremendous family and societal impact;
  5. No statewide process currently exists for the confidential identification, investigation, or dissemination of findings regarding maternal deaths; and
  6. The state has a public health interest in the establishment of a process for review of maternal deaths in order to develop strategies for the prevention of maternal deaths.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9601, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

Compiler’s Notes.

For further information on the world health organization, referred to in subsection (1), see https://www.who.int .

For further information on the institute for health metrics and evaluation, referred to in subsection (2), see http://www.healthdata.org .

For further information on maternal mortality and the centers for disease control and prevention, referred to in subsection (3), see https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/maternal-deaths .

§ 39-9602. Definitions. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

As used in this chapter:

  1. “Committee” means the maternal mortality review committee established by section 39-9603, Idaho Code.
  2. “Department” means the state department of health and welfare.
  3. “Maternal death” means the death of a woman from any cause during pregnancy or within one (1) year following the end of the pregnancy.
History.

I.C.,§ 39-9602, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.

§ 39-9603. Establishment of maternal mortality review committee. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

  1. There is hereby established in the department a maternal mortality review committee, which committee shall conduct comprehensive, multidisciplinary reviews of maternal deaths in Idaho for the purposes of identifying factors associated with the deaths and to make policy recommendations to improve health care services for women and reduce the incidence of maternal mortality in the state. The department may enter into a contract with a third party for administrative functions of the committee.
  2. The committee shall consist of at least twelve (12) but no more than fifteen (15) members selected by the department, to include:
    1. Five (5) physicians licensed under chapter 18, title 54, Idaho Code, with one (1) each from the following medical specialties:
      1. Family medicine with a practice that includes maternity care and delivery;
      2. Obstetrics and gynecology;
      3. Maternal fetal medicine;
      4. Family medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, or emergency medicine that includes maternity care and delivery in a rural setting; and
      5. Medical examiner or pathologist or other physician who conducts autopsies;
    2. One (1) advanced practice professional nurse midwife licensed under chapter 14, title 54, Idaho Code;
    3. One (1) registered nurse licensed under chapter 14, title 54, Idaho Code, working in labor and delivery;
    4. One (1) midwife licensed under chapter 55, title 54, Idaho Code;
    5. One (1) coroner;
    6. One (1) master social worker licensed under chapter 32, title 54, Idaho Code;
    7. One (1) emergency medical services provider licensed under chapter 10, title 56, Idaho Code; and
    8. One (1) public health representative with an expertise in maternal and child health.
  3. In selecting committee members, the department shall consider a composition that is reasonably representative of the state’s geographic diversity.
  4. The department shall:
    1. Identify maternal death cases;
    2. Obtain and review medical records and other relevant data using best practices for case reviews;
    3. Consult, as appropriate, with relevant experts to evaluate and interpret the records and data;
    4. Consult, as appropriate, with family members and other affected or involved persons to collect additional relevant information;
    5. Convene the committee at least annually and provide committee members with the available information necessary to fully review each case; and
    6. Deliver an annual report of the committee’s findings and recommendations to the legislature and make these findings and recommendations available to health care providers, health care facilities, and the general public. (5) The committee shall:

(a) Review medical records and other data obtained by the department for each case;

(b) Make determinations regarding the preventability of maternal deaths; and

(c) Develop recommendations for the prevention of maternal deaths.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9603, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

§ 39-9604. Proceedings, records, confidentiality, and immunity. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

The purpose of the maternal mortality review committee is to gather data and information concerning maternal mortality, conduct thorough and unbiased critical analyses of the causes of maternal mortality, and recommend possible changes to health care delivery in this state to reduce or eliminate preventable maternal deaths. In order to collect the necessary data and information, to the fullest extent possible, the proceedings of the committee and the statements, records, and information created or made therein or gathered by the committee in furtherance of its duties shall be treated as confidential and privileged, and the committee and all participants shall be afforded all protections provided to other organizations and participants therein conducting peer review or other critical analyses under sections 39-1392a through 39-1392f, Idaho Code, or other provisions of state or federal law. Nothing in this chapter shall affect the privileged and confidential nature of a health care organization’s peer review records, activities, or actions.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9604, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

§ 39-9605. Access to records. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

Upon request of the department, all information relating to the incidence of maternal mortality under review shall be provided by health care providers, providers of social services, health care facilities, law enforcement agencies, coroners, medical examiners, emergency medical service personnel, providers of medical transport services, and any other political subdivision or agency of state government having information relevant to the performance of the committee’s duties.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9605, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

§ 39-9606. Rulemaking. [Null and void, effective July 1, 2023.]

The department of health and welfare may promulgate rules pursuant to chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, necessary to administer this chapter.

History.

I.C.,§ 39-9606, as added by 2019, ch. 92, § 1, p. 336.

STATUTORY NOTES

Null and Void, effective July 1, 2023.

This section is null and void, effective July 1, 2023, pursuant to S.L. 2019, ch. 92, § 2.

Cross References.

Department of health and welfare,§ 56-1001 et seq.