Article 1. General Provisions.

§ 122C-1. Short title.

This Chapter may be cited as the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, ss. 1, 2.

Cross References.

See the editor’s notes under G.S. 122C-22 referring to Session Laws 1999-237, ss. 18.8(a) through 18.8(c) regarding facility exemptions from licensure and certificate of need.

For exception from licensure under this chapter of inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse facilities that provide service exclusively to inmates of the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety, see G.S. 148-19.1 .

As to establishment of the School-Based Child and Family Team Initiative, see G.S. 143B-366 .

Mental Health/Substance Use Disorder Central Assessment and Navigation System Pilot Program.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.7(a)-(c), provides: “(a) Pilot Program Creation. — Of the funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2017-2018 fiscal year and the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2018-2019 fiscal year shall be used to oversee, in consultation with the local management entity/managed care organization (LME/MCO) responsible for the management and provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance use disorder services in New Hanover County under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, the establishment of a two-year pilot program to focus on assessing and navigating individuals seeking mental health or substance use disorder services, or both, to appropriate community-based services or other community resources in order to reduce the utilization of hospital emergency department services for mental health and substance use disorder services.

“(b) Program Design and Location. — The pilot program shall be conducted at New Hanover Regional Medical Center (NHRMC) and at Wellness City, operated by Recovery Innovations, Inc., by a three-person centralized team. The three-person team shall consist of the following individuals:

“(1) A master’s level, fully licensed clinician to perform comprehensive clinical assessments of NHRMC patients and other New Hanover County residents exhibiting symptoms of mental illness or substance use disorder who are referred to the pilot program.

“(2) A qualified professional to assist patients, particularly those with a completed comprehensive clinical assessment, with identifying and accessing appropriate community-based services or other community resources.

“(3) A North Carolina certified peer support specialist, with specialized training and personal experience in successfully managing his or her own serious mental illness or substance use disorder, to provide peer support services, including encouraging patients to take personal responsibility for managing their condition, assisting patients in establishing meaningful roles in society, and providing patients with transportation to and from appointments.

“(c) Reports. — By July 1, 2018, the LME/MCO responsible for the management and provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in New Hanover County, in collaboration with New Hanover Regional Medical Center and Recovery Innovations, Inc., shall submit an interim report on the effectiveness of the pilot program to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (Division). By October 1, 2018, the Division shall submit an interim report on the effectiveness of the program and the costs associated with administering the program to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division.

“By July 1, 2019, the LME/MCO responsible for the management and provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in New Hanover County, in collaboration with New Hanover Regional Medical Center and Recovery Innovations, Inc., shall submit a final report of the program to the Division. By October 1, 2019, the Division shall then submit a final report of the program to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division. The report shall include the Division’s recommendations with respect to sustaining or expanding the program.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12F.4A(a)-(e), as amended by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, provides: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services shall require local management entities, including local management entities that have been approved to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver (LME/MCOs), to implement clinical integration activities with Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) through Total Care, a collaborative initiative designed to improve and minimize the cost of care for patients who suffer from comorbid mental health or substance abuse and primary care or other chronic conditions.

“(b) The Department shall ensure that, by no later than January 1, 2014, all LME/MCOs submit claims data, including to the extent practical, retrospective claims data and integrated payment and reporting system (IPRS) data, to the CCNC Informatics Center and to the Medicaid Management Information System. Upon receipt of this claims data, CCNC shall provide access to clinical data and care management information within the CCNC Informatics Center to LME/MCOs and authorized behavioral health providers to support (i) treatment, quality assessment, and improvement activities or (ii) coordination of appropriate and effective patient care, treatment, or habilitation.

“(c) The Department, in consultation with CCNC and the LME/MCOs, shall develop quality and performance statistics on the status of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including, but not limited to, variations in total cost of care, clinical outcomes, and access to and utilization of services.

“(d) The Department shall, within available appropriations and as deemed necessary by the Department, expand or alter existing contracts by mutual agreement of all parties to the contract in order to implement the provisions of this section.

“(e) Repealed by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, effective July 1, 2017.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12F.5, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall not take any further action or expend any funds appropriated or available to the Department to develop and implement the health care information system for State facilities operated by the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services until each of the following conditions has been met:

“(1) By no later than March 1, 2014, the Department shall submit a detailed plan of this system to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Information Technology, and the Fiscal Research Division. The plan shall include an explanation of at least all of the following:

“a. The process the Department used to select the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VisTA), whether or not the selection process was competitive, and if not, why it was not.

“b. Requirements for vendor services to support system implementation and operation and the costs associated with this support.

“c. Governance structure for the system.

“d. Modules to be implemented in each facility and the reason for each.

“e. Assignment of responsibility for system maintenance, codes fixes, application upgrades, and hardware upgrades.

“f. Whether the application and database will be implemented at each facility or centrally managed by the Department and the reasons for the decision.

“g. Identification of additional hardware that will be required to support a statewide rollout and the location at which the Department plans to host it.

“h. Assignment of responsibility for backup and recovery.

“i. If there will be redundant failover between facilities.

“j. Plans, time lines, and costs for implementing any other modules currently offered by the United State Department of Veterans Affairs.

“k. A process for ensuring that the system software is upgraded whenever the United States Department of Veterans Affairs upgrades its system.

“ l . Technology constraints for VisTA and State-supported facilities and how they will be addressed, by facility.

“m. Facility on-boarding plan for the State psychiatric hospitals and other State facilities operated by the Division.

“n. Costs and sources of funding for planning, development, and implementation at each facility and five years of costs and sources of funding for operations and maintenance at each facility.

“o. Any other costs associated with system planning, development, implementation, operation, and maintenance.

“p. Any issues associated with the planning, development, and implementation, identified by the Department, the Office of the State Chief Information Officer, the Office of Information Technology Services, or the Office of State Budget and Management, with a solution for each identified issue.

“(2) Upon submission of the plan required by subdivision (1) of this section, the Department shall obtain prior approval from the State Chief Information Officer in order to take any further action or expend any funds appropriated or available to the Department to develop and implement the health care information system for State facilities operated by the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.”

Session Laws 2010-152, ss. 18.1-18.6, provide: “SECTION 18.1. The Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study and propose recommendations by January 31, 2011, regarding the cost-effectiveness of supportive housing as an alternative to institutionalization of the MH/DD/SA populations.

“SECTION 18.2. The study shall be conducted by a task force appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

“SECTION 18.3. The Task Force shall include the following:

“(1) Five representatives from various areas of the Department of Health and Human Services.

“(2) One representative from the Housing Trust Fund.

“(3) Six representatives from Local Management Entities.

“(4) Two representatives from the North Carolina Department of Correction [now the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety].

“(5) One representative from the Division of Medical Assistance.

“(6) One representative from Community Care of North Carolina.

“(7) Two representatives from private providers of housing services for the mentally ill.

“(8) Two representatives from public housing agencies.

“(9) Two consumer representatives — a direct consumer and a family member, from a MH/DD/SA consumer/advocacy group.

“SECTION 18.4. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall appoint two cochairs of the Task Force.

“SECTION 18.5. The Task Force will propose a plan focusing on the following goals:

“(1) Develop a cost-effective system of care for the MH/DD/SA population.

“(2) Decrease the need for hospital admission of target population.

“(3) Decrease the length of stay in psychiatric hospitals.

“(4) Decrease incarceration rate of the MH/DD/SA populations.

“(5) Decrease emergency room use by the MH/DD/SA populations.

“(6) Improve level of functioning of the MH/DD/SA populations.

“(7) Explore funding possibilities from Medicaid and other sources.

“(8) Decrease homelessness among the MH/DD/SA populations.

“(9) Maintain MH/DD/SA patients in community setting.

“(10) Decrease impact on law enforcement.

“(11) Make our communities safer for both consumers and others.

“(12) Reduce recidivism for the MH/DD/SA population.

“SECTION 18.6. The Task Force shall:

“(1) Identify frequent users of psychiatric beds (State and community) and emergency departments.

“(2) For the above group, determine:

“a. Their housing situation.

“b. Incarceration history.

“c. Recidivism rates.

“d. Treatment offered and treatment compliance.

“e. Other factors as determined by Task Force.

“(3) Review existing State and national initiatives in this area.

“(4) Use information from subdivisions (1) and (2) of this section to do the following:

“a. Study current practices and issues related to placement of MH/DD/SA populations following discharge from psychiatric facilities.

“b. Develop a business case for the development of a statewide supportive housing initiative to benefit MH/DD/SA populations.

“c. Calculate the number of supportive housing units needed in the State.

“d. Calculate the level of capital investment needed for this multiyear initiative.

“e. Propose different methods that could be used to pay for ongoing operational costs.

“f. Examine the potential cost-saving attained through this strategy.

“g. Calculate the level of capital investment needed for this multiyear initiative.

“(5) Other tasks as identified by the Task Force.”

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 2(a), provides: “The Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services of the Department of Health and Human Services shall collaborate with military agencies and other appropriate organizations to determine gaps in the care of current and former members of the reserve or active components of the Armed Forces of the United States with traumatic brain injury, shall develop recommendations for an accessible community-based neurobehavioral system of care for those service members, and shall report its recommendations by July 1, 2012, to the Chairs of the House of Representatives and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Health and Human Services and Justice and Public Safety, to the Chairs of the House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, Military, and Veterans Affairs, and to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. The recommendations shall be tailored so that, if implemented, services would be available to service members, veterans, and their families and would consist of neurobehavioral programs, residential programs, comprehensive day programs, and home-based programs.”

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 2(b), provides: “The Division of Medical Assistance of the Department of Health and Human Services, MedSolutions, Inc., and the appropriate health professionals at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs shall work together to ensure that MedSolutions, Inc., is using the appropriate evidence-based diagnostic testing (including imaging, biomarker testing, and other tests) for screening and assessment of traumatic brain injury.”

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 3(a) and (b), provides: “(a) The North Carolina Area Health Education Centers (AHEC) Program shall facilitate and continue to provide health education and skills training for health professional students; primary care, mental health, and substance abuse service providers; and hospital administrators about the health, mental health, and substance abuse needs of the military and their families. This training shall include information about the following:

“(1) The number of North Carolinians who are serving or who have served in the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States.

“(2) Military culture.

“(3) The average number of deployments, length of time in conflict zones, and potential injuries these members may have faced, particularly those who have served recently in Iraq or Afghanistan.

“(4) The types of health, mental health, and substance abuse disorders that service personnel may have experienced, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), military sexual trauma (MST), depression, substance use disorders, potential suicide risks, or domestic violence.

“(5) The potential impact of the deployment cycle on family members and children. This information shall include information about resiliency skills, intervention skills, resources, and community supports.

“(6) Evidence-based screening and assessment instruments.

“(7) Evidence-based case management, treatment, and medication management for different mental health and substance abuse problems, and potential adverse effects of prescribed medications, particularly for people with comorbidities.

“(8) Information about the TRICARE system, payment, and enrollment procedures.

“(9) Available referral sources through TRICARE, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Military One Source, Army One Source, Defense Centers of Excellence, Deployment Health Clinical Center, the North Carolina National Guard’s Integrated Behavioral Health System, Local Management Entities, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Citizen Services, North Carolina Health Info, Federally Qualified Health Centers, professional advocacy and support services, and other community resources.

“(b) In carrying out the requirements of Section 3(a) of this act, the AHEC Program shall collaborate with the Citizen Soldier Support Program; North Carolina health professional training programs; the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; the North Carolina Division of Veterans Affairs; The University of North Carolina; Operation Re-Entry North Carolina; the North Carolina Community College System; health care professional associations; the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services; Governor’s Focus on Servicemembers, Veterans, and Their Families; and academic health programs.”

Editor’s Note.

For comparable sections of repealed Chapter 122 and new Chapter 122C, see the table at the end of Chapter 122C.

Session Laws 2013-397, s. 9, provides: “The Transitions to Community Living Fund established pursuant to Section 10.23A(d) of S.L. 2012-142 terminates on June 30, 2020, and any balance remaining on that date shall revert to the General Fund.” Session Laws 2012-142, s. 10.23A(d) is noted in full above.

Session Laws 2020-78, s. 4E.2, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, shall report annually, beginning September 1, 2020, and ending on September 1, 2026, on the implementation of the use of funds to purchase inpatient alcohol and substance use disorder treatment services required by Section 12F.12 of S.L. 2015-241, as amended by Section 11F.4 of S.L. 2017-57. The report shall be submitted to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division with the following information for the prior fiscal year and the two preceding fiscal years, for each Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center (ADATC):

“(1) The number of beds in operation.

“(2) The number of bed days.

“(3) The total amount of receipts, the amount of those receipts that were received from local management entities/managed care organizations, and the amount of those receipts that were received from all other sources.

“(4) Cost of operation of the ADATC, with personnel and staffing costs reported separately from all other costs.

“(5) The ADATC’s profit or loss.”

Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.1, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to the 2019-2021 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2020-78, s. 22.3, is a severability clause.

Legal Periodicals.

For comment, “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Indefinite Confinement and the Unconstitutional Treatment of North Carolinians with Mental Retardation,” see 35 Campbell L. Rev. 257 (2013).

For article, “About a Revolution: Toward Integrated Treatment in Drug and Mental Health Courts,” see 97 N.C.L. Rev. 355 (2019).

For article, “COVID-19, Health Justice, and the Privilege of Space: A New Critical Intersectional Framework for Creating a Prescription for Equal Well-Being and Applied to Addressing Health of Children Residing in Psychiatric Institutions,” see 43 Campbell L. Rev. 309 (2021).

CASE NOTES

Personal Jurisdiction in Molestation by Foster Child Case. —

Where defendants raised the issues of failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but failed to raise the issue of personal jurisdiction, and stipulated in the record before the appellate court that they were properly before the trial court, the defendants could not argue that they were not subject to suit under Chapter 108A, G.S. 153A-77 , and this section. Hobbs v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 135 N.C. App. 412, 520 S.E.2d 595, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 1146 (1999).

Request for Instruction. —

Denial of defendant’s request for a modified jury instruction regarding post-verdict commitment procedures after a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity was not erroneous because the trial court properly instructed the jury on the “central meaning of the statute,” and its instruction substantially complied with defendant’s request. State v. Hall, 187 N.C. App. 308, 653 S.E.2d 200, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 2453 (2007).

§ 122C-2. Policy.

The policy of the State is to assist individuals with needs for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in ways consistent with the dignity, rights, and responsibilities of all North Carolina citizens. Within available resources it is the obligation of State and local government to provide mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services through a delivery system designed to meet the needs of clients in the least restrictive, therapeutically most appropriate setting available and to maximize their quality of life. It is further the obligation of State and local government to provide community-based services when such services are appropriate, unopposed by the affected individuals, and can be reasonably accommodated within available resources and taking into account the needs of other persons for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

State and local governments shall develop and maintain a unified system of services centered in area authorities or county programs. The public service system will strive to provide a continuum of services for clients while considering the availability of services in the private sector. Within available resources, State and local government shall ensure that the following core services are available:

  1. Screening, assessment, and referral.
  2. Emergency services.
  3. Service coordination.
  4. Consultation, prevention, and education.

    Within available resources, the State shall provide funding to support services to targeted populations, except that the State and counties shall provide matching funds for entitlement program services as required by law.

    As used in this Chapter, the phrase “within available resources” means State funds appropriated and non-State funds and other resources appropriated, allocated or otherwise made available for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

    The furnishing of services to implement the policy of this section requires the cooperation and financial assistance of counties, the State, and the federal government.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 1; 1983, c. 383, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 771; 1989, c. 625, s. 2; 2001-437, s. 1.1.

Editor’s Note.

The preamble to Session Laws 2001-437 reads:

“Whereas, the 1999 General Assembly, Regular Session 2000, established the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee (‘Committee’) on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services; and

“Whereas, the Committee was directed to develop a Plan for Mental Health System Reform; and Whereas, the General Assembly expressed the intent that the Plan be fully implemented not later than July 1, 2005; and

“Whereas, the General Assembly directed the Committee to ‘Report to the 2001 General Assembly upon its convening the changes that should be made to the governance, structure, and financing of the State’s mental health system at the State and local levels’; and

“Whereas, the Committee reviewed the governance, structure, and financing of the current mental health system and reported its findings and recommendations to the 2001 General Assembly for legislative action;

“Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:”

CASE NOTES

No Exception to the General Public Duty Doctrine Created. —

Neither G.S. 122C-301 nor this section expressly authorizes a private right of action for the breach of its terms or imposes an affirmative duty on an officer beyond the public duty doctrine. Lane v. City of Kinston, 142 N.C. App. 622, 544 S.E.2d 810, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 178 (2001).

Not Error to Order Readmission Despite Recommendation of Less Restrictive Treatment. —

Readmitting a juvenile to a psychiatric residential treatment facility despite a recommendation that the juvenile be discharged to less restrictive treatment did not err because no sufficient lesser facility was available, so (1) literally interpreting G.S. 122C-2 24.3(f), barring such readmission if less restrictive treatment were appropriate, was absurd, and (2) G.S. 122C-2 intended use of available resources. In re M.B., 240 N.C. App. 140, 771 S.E.2d 615, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 262 (2015).

§ 122C-3. Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this Chapter:

  1. Area authority. — The area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authority.
  2. Area board. — The area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse board. (2a) Area director. — The administrative head of the area authority program appointed pursuant to G.S. 122C-121 .

    (2b) “Behavioral health and intellectual/developmental disabilities tailored plan” or “BH IDD tailored plan” has the same meaning as in G.S. 108D-1 .

    (2c) Board of county commissioners. — Includes the participating boards of county commissioners for multicounty area authorities and multicounty programs.

  3. Camp Butner reservation. — The original Camp Butner reservation as may be designated by the Secretary as having been acquired by the State and includes not only areas which are owned and occupied by the State but also those which may have been leased or otherwise disposed of by the State, and also includes those areas within the municipal boundaries of the Town of Butner and that portion of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town of Butner consisting of lands not owned by the State of North Carolina.
  4. Catchment area. — The geographic part of the State served by a specific area authority or county program.
  5. City. — As defined in G.S. 153A-1(1) .
  6. Client. — An individual who is admitted to and receiving service from, or who in the past had been admitted to and received services from, a facility.
  7. Client advocate. — A person whose role is to monitor the protection of client rights or to act as an individual advocate on behalf of a particular client in a facility.
  8. Commission. — The Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, established under Part 4 of Article 3 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes. (8a) Commitment examiner. — A physician, an eligible psychologist, or any health professional or mental health professional who is certified under G.S. 122C-263.1 to perform the first examination for involuntary commitment described in G.S. 122C-263(c) or G.S. 122C-283(c) as required by Parts 7 and 8 of this Article.
  9. Confidential information. — Any information, whether recorded or not, relating to an individual served by a facility that was received in connection with the performance of any function of the facility. “Confidential information” does not include statistical information from reports and records or information regarding treatment or services which is shared for training, treatment, habilitation, or monitoring purposes that does not identify clients either directly or by reference to publicly known or available information.

    (9a) Core services. — Services that are necessary for the basic foundation of any service delivery system. Core services are of two types: front-end service capacity such as screening, assessment, and emergency triage, and indirect services such as prevention, education, and consultation at a community level.

  10. County of residence. — The county of a client’s domicile at the time of his or her admission or commitment to a facility. A county of residence is not changed because an individual is temporarily out of his or her county in a facility or otherwise. (10a) County program. — A mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services program established, operated, and governed by a county pursuant to G.S. 122C-115.1 .
  11. Dangerous to self or others.
    1. Dangerous to self. — Within the relevant past, the individual has done any of the following:
      1. The individual has acted in such a way as to show all of the following:
        1. The individual would be unable, without care, supervision, and the continued assistance of others not otherwise available, to exercise self-control, judgment, and discretion in the conduct of the individual’s daily responsibilities and social relations, or to satisfy the individual’s need for nourishment, personal or medical care, shelter, or self-protection and safety.
        2. There is a reasonable probability of the individual’s suffering serious physical debilitation within the near future unless adequate treatment is given pursuant to this Chapter. A showing of behavior that is grossly irrational, of actions that the individual is unable to control, of behavior that is grossly inappropriate to the situation, or of other evidence of severely impaired insight and judgment shall create a prima facie inference that the individual is unable to care for himself or herself.
      2. The individual has attempted suicide or threatened suicide and that there is a reasonable probability of suicide unless adequate treatment is given pursuant to this Chapter.
      3. The individual has mutilated himself or herself or has attempted to mutilate himself or herself and that there is a reasonable probability of serious self-mutilation unless adequate treatment is given pursuant to this Chapter. Previous episodes of dangerousness to self, when applicable, may be considered when determining reasonable probability of physical debilitation, suicide, or self-mutilation.
    2. Dangerous to others. — Within the relevant past, the individual has inflicted or attempted to inflict or threatened to inflict serious bodily harm on another, or has acted in such a way as to create a substantial risk of serious bodily harm to another, or has engaged in extreme destruction of property; and that there is a reasonable probability that this conduct will be repeated. Previous episodes of dangerousness to others, when applicable, may be considered when determining reasonable probability of future dangerous conduct. Clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that an individual has committed a homicide in the relevant past is prima facie evidence of dangerousness to others.

      (11a) Day/night service. — A service provided on a regular basis, in a structured environment that is offered to the same individual for a period of three or more hours within a 24-hour period.

      (12) Department. — The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

      (12a) Developmental disability. — A severe, chronic disability of a person that satisfies all of the following:

      a. Is attributable to a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments.

      b. Is manifested before the person attains age 22, unless the disability is caused by a traumatic brain injury, in which case the disability may be manifested after attaining age 22.

    3. Is likely to continue indefinitely.
    4. Results in substantial functional limitations in three or more of the following areas of major life activity: self-care, receptive and expressive language, capacity for independent living, learning, mobility, self-direction, and economic self-sufficiency.
    5. Reflects the person’s need for a combination and sequence of special interdisciplinary, or generic care, treatment, or other services that are of a lifelong or extended duration and are individually planned and coordinated; or when applied to children from birth through age four, may be evidenced as a developmental delay.
    6. Repealed by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 1, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

      (13) Division. — The Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services of the Department.

      (13a) Repealed by Session Laws 2000-67, s. 11.21(c), effective July 1, 2000.

      (13a1) Recodified as subdivision (13c).

      (13b) Recodified as subdivision (13d).

      (13c) Eligible infants and toddlers. — Children with or at risk for developmental delays or atypical development until all of the following have occurred:

      a. They have reached their third birthday.

      b. Their parents have requested to have them receive services in the preschool program for children with disabilities established under Article 9 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes.

      c. They have been placed in the program by the local educational agency.

      In no event shall a child be considered an eligible toddler after the beginning of the school year immediately following the child’s third birthday, unless the Secretary and the State Board enter into an agreement under G.S. 115C-107.1(c) .

      The early intervention services that may be provided for these children and their families include early identification and screening, multidisciplinary evaluations, case management services, family training, counseling and home visits, psychological services, speech pathology and audiology, and occupational and physical therapy. All evaluations performed as part of early intervention services shall be appropriate to the individual child’s age and development.

      (13d) Eligible psychologist. — A licensed psychologist who has at least two years’ clinical experience. After January 1, 1995, “eligible psychologist” means a licensed psychologist who holds permanent licensure and certification as a health services provider psychologist issued by the North Carolina Psychology Board.

      (14) Facility. — Any person at one location whose primary purpose is to provide services for the care, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation of individuals with mental illnesses or intellectual or other developmental disabilities or substance abusers, and includes all of the following:

      a. An “area facility,” which is a facility that is operated by or under contract with the area authority or county program. For the purposes of this subparagraph, a contract is a contract, memorandum of understanding, or other written agreement whereby the facility agrees to provide services to one or more clients of the area authority or county program. Area facilities may also be licensable facilities in accordance with Article 2 of this Chapter. A State facility is not an area facility.

      b. A “licensable facility,” which is a facility for one or more minors or for two or more adults that provides services to individuals who have mental illnesses or intellectual or other developmental disabilities or are substance abusers. These services shall be day services offered to the same individual for a period of three hours or more during a 24-hour period, or residential services provided for 24 consecutive hours or more. Facilities for individuals who are substance abusers include chemical dependency facilities.

      c. A “private facility,” which is a facility that is either a licensable facility or a special unit of a general hospital or a part of either in which the specific service provided is not covered under the terms of a contract with an area authority.

      d. The psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.

      e. A “residential facility,” which is a 24-hour facility that is not a hospital, including a group home.

      f. A “State facility”, which is a facility that is operated by the Secretary.

    7. A “24-hour facility,” which is a facility that provides a structured living environment and services for a period of 24 consecutive hours or more and includes hospitals that are facilities under this Chapter.
    8. A Veterans Administration facility or part thereof that provides services for the care, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation of individuals with mental illnesses or intellectual or other developmental disabilities or substance abusers.

      (15) Guardian. — A person appointed as a guardian of the person or general guardian by the court under Chapters 7A or 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes.

      (16) Habilitation. — Training, care, and specialized therapies undertaken to assist a client in maintaining his current level of functioning or in achieving progress in developmental skills areas.

      (16a) Health screening. — An appropriate screening suitable for the symptoms presented and within the capability of the entity, including ancillary services routinely available to the entity, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. An emergency medical condition exists if an individual has acute symptoms of sufficient severity, including severe pain, such that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in placing the individual’s health in serious jeopardy, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of any bodily organ or part.

      (16b) Incapable. — With respect to an individual, as defined in G.S. 122C-72(4). An adult individual who is incapable is not the same as an incompetent adult unless the adult individual has been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes.

      (17) Incompetent adult. — An adult individual who has been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes.

      (17a) Intellectual disability. — A developmental disability characterized by significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested before age 22.

      (18) Intoxicated. — The condition of an individual whose mental or physical functioning is presently substantially impaired as a result of the use of alcohol or other substance.

      (19) Law enforcement officer. — Sheriff, deputy sheriff, police officer, State highway patrolman, or an officer employed by a city or county under G.S. 122C-302 .

      (20) “Legally responsible person” means: (i) when applied to an adult, who has been adjudicated incompetent, a guardian, subject to the limitations of G.S. 35A-1241(3); (ii) when applied to a minor, a parent, guardian, a person standing in loco parentis, or a legal custodian other than a parent who has been granted specific authority by law or in a custody order to consent for medical care, including psychiatric treatment; or (iii) when applied to an adult who has a health care power of attorney and who is incapable as defined in G.S. 122C-72(4) a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney unless the adult is adjudicated incompetent following the execution of the health care power of attorney and the health care agent’s authority is suspended pursuant to G.S. 32A-22 and G.S. 35A-1208 ; provided that if an incapable adult does not have a health care agent or guardian, “legally responsible person” means one of the persons specified in subdivisions (3) through (7) of subsection (c) of G.S. 90-21.13 , to be selected based on the priority indicated in said subdivisions (3) through (7).

      (20a) Local funds. — Fees from services, including client payments, Medicare and the local and federal share of Medicaid receipts, fees from agencies under contract, gifts and donations, and county and municipal funds, and any other funds not administered by the Division.

      (20b) Local management entity (LME). — An area authority.

      (20c) Local management entity/managed care organization (LME/MCO). — A local management entity that is under contract with the Department to operate the combined Medicaid Waiver program authorized under Section 1915(b) and Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act or to operate a BH IDD tailored plan.

      (21) Mental illness. — The following:

      a. When applied to an adult, an illness which so lessens the capacity of the individual to use self-control, judgment, and discretion in the conduct of the individual’s affairs and social relations as to make it necessary or advisable for the individual to be under treatment, care, supervision, guidance, or control.

      b. When applied to a minor, a mental condition, other than an intellectual disability alone, that so impairs the minor’s capacity to exercise age adequate self-control or judgment in the conduct of the minor’s activities and social relationships so that the minor is in need of treatment.

      (22), (23) Repealed by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 1, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

      (23a) Minimally adequate services. — A level of service required for compliance with all applicable State and federal laws, rules, regulations, and policies and with generally accepted professional standards and principles.

      (24) Next of kin. — The individual designated in writing by the client or the client’s legally responsible person upon the client’s acceptance at a facility. If no such designation has been made, “next of kin” means the client’s spouse or nearest blood relation in accordance with G.S. 104A-1 .

      (25) Operating costs. — Expenditures made by an area authority in the delivery of services for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse as provided in this Chapter and includes the employment of legal counsel on a temporary basis to represent the interests of the area authority.

      (26) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 345, s. 1.

      (26a) Other recipient. — An individual who is not admitted to a facility but who receives a service other than care, treatment, or rehabilitation services. The services that the “other recipient” may receive include consultative, preventative, educational, and assessment services.

      (27) Outpatient treatment. — As used in Part 7 of Article 5 of this Chapter, means treatment in an outpatient setting and may include medication, individual or group therapy, day or partial day programming activities, services and training including educational and vocational activities, supervision of living arrangements, and any other services prescribed either to alleviate the individual’s illness or disability, to maintain semi-independent functioning, or to prevent further deterioration that may reasonably be predicted to result in the need for inpatient commitment to a 24-hour facility.

      (27a) Outpatient treatment physician or center. — As used in Part 7 of Article 5 of this Chapter, a physician or center that provides treatment services directly to the outpatient commitment respondent. An LME/MCO that contracts with an outpatient treatment physician or center to provide outpatient treatment services to a respondent is not an outpatient treatment physician or center. Every LME/MCO is responsible for contracting with qualified providers of services in accordance with G.S. 122C-141 , 122C-142(a), 122C-115.2(b)(1)b., and 122C-115.4(b)(2) to ensure the availability of qualified providers of outpatient commitment services to clients of LME/MCOs who are respondents to outpatient commitment proceedings and meet the criteria for outpatient commitment. A contracted provider with an LME/MCO shall not be designated as an outpatient treatment physician or center on an outpatient commitment order unless the respondent enrolled with an LME/MCO or is eligible for services through an LME/MCO, or the respondent otherwise qualifies for the provision of services offered by the provider.

      (28) Person. — Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint stock association, agency, or area authority.

      (29) Physician. — An individual licensed to practice medicine in North Carolina under Chapter 90 of the General Statutes or a licensed medical doctor employed by the Veterans Administration.

      (29a) Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 1, effective October 1, 2019.

      (29b) “Prepaid health plan” has the same meaning as in G.S. 108D-1 .

      (30) Provider of support services. — A person that provides to a facility support services such as data processing, dosage preparation, laboratory analyses, or legal, medical, accounting, or other professional services, including human services.

      (30a) Psychologist. — An individual licensed to practice psychology under Chapter 90 of the General Statutes. The term “eligible psychologist” is defined in subdivision (13d) of this section.

      (30b) Public services. — Publicly funded mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, whether provided by public or private providers.

      (31) Qualified professional. — Any individual with appropriate training or experience as specified by the General Statutes or by rule of the Commission in the fields of mental health or developmental disabilities or substance abuse treatment or habilitation, including physicians, psychologists, psychological associates, educators, social workers, registered nurses, certified fee-based practicing pastoral counselors, and certified counselors.

      (32) Responsible professional. — An individual within a facility who is designated by the facility director to be responsible for the care, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation of a specific client and who is eligible to provide care, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation relative to the client’s disability.

      (32a) Secretary. — The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

      (32b) Security recordings. — Any films, videos, or electronic or other media recordings of a common area in a State facility that are produced for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing the health and safety of clients, residents, staff, or visitors of that State facility. The term does not include recordings of a client’s clinical sessions or any other recordings that are part of a client’s confidential records or information.

      (33) Renumbered as subdivision (32a).

      (33a) Severe and persistent mental illness. —A mental disorder suffered by persons of 18 years of age or older that leads these persons to exhibit emotional or behavioral functioning that is so impaired as to interfere substantially with their capacity to remain in the community without supportive treatment or services of a long term or indefinite duration. This disorder is a severe and persistent mental disability, resulting in a long-term limitation of functional capacities for the primary activities of daily living, such as interpersonal relations, homemaking, self-care, employment, and recreation.

      (34) Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.2(c), effective July 1, 2002.

      (35) Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.2(c), effective July 1, 2002.

      (35a) Renumbered as subdivision (35e).

      (35b) Specialty services. — Services that are provided to consumers from low-incidence populations.

      (35c) State or Local Consumer Advocate. — The individual carrying out the duties of the State or Local Consumer Advocacy Program Office in accordance with Article 1A of this Chapter.

      (35d) State Plan. — The State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.

      (35e) State resources. — State and federal funds and other receipts administered by the Division.

      (36) Substance abuse. — The pathological use or abuse of alcohol or other drugs in a way or to a degree that produces an impairment in personal, social, or occupational functioning. “Substance abuse” may include a pattern of tolerance and withdrawal.

      (37) Substance abuser. — An individual who engages in substance abuse.

      (38) Targeted population. — Those individuals who are given service priority under the State Plan.

      (38a) Traumatic brain injury. — An injury to the brain caused by an external physical force resulting in total or partial functional disability, psychosocial impairment, or both, and meets all of the following criteria:

      a. Involves an open or closed head injury.

      b. Resulted from a single event, or resulted from a series of events which may include multiple concussions.

      c. Occurs with or without a loss of consciousness at the time of injury.

      d. Results in impairments in one or more areas of the following functions: cognition; language; memory; attention; reasoning; abstract thinking; judgment; problem-solving; sensory, perceptual, and motor abilities; psychosocial behavior; physical functions; information processing; and speech.

      e. Does not include brain injuries that are congenital or degenerative.

      (39) Uniform portal process. — A standardized process and procedures used to ensure consumer access to, and exit from, public services in accordance with the State Plan.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 28; Rev., s. 4574; C.S., s. 6189; 1945, c. 952, s. 18; 1947, c. 537, s. 12; 1949, c. 71, s. 3; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1957, c. 1232, s. 13; 1959, c. 1028, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, ss. 2, 10; c. 1184, s. 1; 1965, c. 933; 1973, c. 475, s. 2; c. 476, s. 133; c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, ss. 1, 3; 1977, c. 400, ss. 2, 12; c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1134, s. 2; 1979, c. 164, ss. 3, 4; c. 171, s. 2; c. 358, ss. 2, 26; c. 915, s. 1; c. 751, s. 28; 1981, c. 51, ss. 2-4; c. 539, s. 1; 1983, c. 280; c. 383, s. 2; c. 638, s. 2; c. 718, s. 1; c. 864, s. 4; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1110, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 1; c. 777, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 7; 1987, c. 345, s. 1; c. 830, ss. 47(a), (b); 1989, c. 141, s. 8; c. 223; c. 486, s. 2; c. 625, s. 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 11; c. 1003, s. 2; c. 1024, s. 26(a); 1993, c. 321, s. 220(a)-(c); c. 375, s. 6; c. 396, ss. 1, 2; 1995, c. 249, s. 1; c. 406, s. 5; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1997-456, s. 27; 1998-198, s. 3; 1998-202, s. 4(r); 1999-186, s. 1; 2000-67, s. 11.21(c); 2001-437, ss. 1.2(b), 1.2(c); 2001-437, s. 1.2(a); 2003-313, s. 1; 2006-69, s. 3(n); 2006-142, ss. 4(a), 7; 2007-269, s. 3.1; 2007-502, s. 15(a); 2008-107, s. 10.15(dd); 2013-85, s. 1; 2018-33, s. 1; 2019-76, s. 1; 2019-81, s. 9; 2019-240, ss. 20(a), 22, 26(a); 2021-77, s. 1.

Cross References.

As to licensure as a supervised living facility for developmentally disabled adults, see the editor’s notes under G.S. 122C-21 .

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

The definitions in the section above have been set out in alphabetical order at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Subdivisions (13a1) and (13b) were renumbered as subdivisions (13c) and (13d) pursuant to S.L. 1997-456, s. 27 which authorized the Revisor of Statutes to renumber or reletter sections and parts of sections having a number or letter designation that is incompatible with the General Assembly’s computer database.

Session Laws 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1003, s. 6 provides: “Sections 1 through 4 of this act [which amended this section] shall become effective July 1, 1990, and Section 5 of this act shall become effective July 1, 1991, if and only if specific funds are appropriated for the specific programs established by this act. Funds appropriated for the 1990-91 fiscal year or for any year in the future do not constitute any entitlement to services beyond those provided for that fiscal year. Nothing in this act creates any rights except to the extent that funds are appropriated by the State to implement its provisions from year to year and nothing in this act obligates the General Assembly to appropriate any funds to implement its provisions.” An appropriation was made to implement the provisions of this act in the 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990) Session.

The bracketed reference, “[ G.S. 115C-107.1(c) ]” in subdivision (13c), was added at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes as that appears to be the intended reference.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Session Laws 2017-32, s. 2, provides: “Any changes to clinical coverage policies and any changes to rules adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services relating to the qualifications for Qualified Professionals required under Section 1 of this act shall not become effective until DHHS has received CMS approval of the State Plan amendment required by Section 1 of this act.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 1, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 1 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-69, s. 3(n), effective July 10, 2006, in subdivision (13c)b., substituted “children with disabilities established under Article 9” for “handicapped children pursuant to Part 14 of Article IX”; and substituted “birthday, unless the Secretary and the State Board enter into an agreement under G.S. 115C-106.4(c)” for “birthday” in the second paragraph of subsection (13c).

Session Laws 2006-142, ss. 4(a) and 7, effective July 19, 2006, rewrote the introductory language; rewrote subdivision (14)b.; and added subdivision (20b).

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 3.1, added the language following “disposed of by the State” at the end of subdivision (3). For effective date, see Editor’s note.

Session Laws 2007-502, s. 15(a), effective October 1, 2007, deleted “as prescribed in Article 3 of Chapter 32 of the General Statutes” at the end of subdivision (20).

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15(dd), effective July 1, 2008, added subdivision (23a).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 1, added subdivisions (8a), (16a), (16b), and (27a); in subdivision (11), substituted “self” for “himself” twice; in subdivision (17), substituted “who has been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes” for “adjudicated incompetent”; in subdivision (20), substituted “G.S. 122C-72(4)” for “G.S. 122C-72(c)” and added the proviso at the end; in subdivision (20b), substituted “authority.” for “authority, county program, or consolidated human services agency. It is a collective term that refers to functional responsibilities rather than governance structure.”; and deleted subdivision (29a), which read: “ ‘Program director’ means the director of a county program established pursuant to G.S. 122C-115.1 .” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 1, rewrote this section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-81, s. 9, effective October 1, 2019, added subdivision (2b); redesignated former subdivision (2b) as subdivision (2c); added “or to operate a BH IDD tailored plan” at the end of subdivision (20c); and added subdivision (29b).

Session Laws 2019-240, ss. 20(a), 22, 26(a), effective November 6, 2019, redesignated former subdivision (33) as subdivision (32a); added subdivisions (32b) and 38(a); rewrote subdivision (12a); and in subdivision (20), inserted “subject to the limitations of G.S. 35A-1241(3)” in clause (i) and substituted “has a health care power of attorney and who is incapable as defined in G.S. 122C-72(4) a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney unless the adult is adjudicated incompetent following the execution of the health care power of attorney and the health care agent’s authority is suspended pursuant to G.S. 32A-22 and G.S. 35A-1208 ” for “is incapable as defined in G.S. 122C-72(4) and who has not been adjudicated incompetent” in clause (iii).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 1, effective July 2, 2021, substituted “a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments” for “one or more impairments” in subdivision (12a)a.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For survey of 1983 law on constitutional law, see 62 N.C.L. Rev. 1149 (1984).

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

For comment, “Criminal Defendants Deemed Incapable to Proceed to Trial: An Evaluation of North Carolina’s Statutory Scheme,” see 26 Campbell L. Rev. 41 (2004).

For comment, “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Indefinite Confinement and the Unconstitutional Treatment of North Carolinians with Mental Retardation,” see 35 Campbell L. Rev. 257 (2013).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Many of the cases cited below were decided under former statutory provisions.

Court Could Not Declare Subdivision Unconstitutional Nunc Pro Tunc. —

Where the trial court concluded the case or controversy by finding the respondent not mentally ill pursuant to this section, it lacked jurisdiction to subsequently (six months later) declare nunc pro tunc that subdivision (21)(ii) was unconstitutional. In re Lynette H., 323 N.C. 598 , 374 S.E.2d 272, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 702 (1988).

Effect of 1985 Amendment. —

When the legislature in 1985, deleted the term “recent past” and substituted the term “relevant past,” the Court of Appeals construed this legislative amendment as an effort on the part of the legislature to clarify the meaning of the statute, not to change the law. Davis v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 121 N.C. App. 105, 465 S.E.2d 2, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 1049 (1995).

Statutory language establishes a two-prong test for dangerousness to self. The first prong addresses self-care ability regarding one’s daily affairs. The second prong, which also must be satisfied for involuntary commitment to result, mandates a specific finding of a probability of serious physical debilitation resulting from the more general finding of lack of self-caring ability. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980); In re Crainshaw, 54 N.C. App. 429, 283 S.E.2d 553, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2844 (1981); In re Medlin, 59 N.C. App. 33, 295 S.E.2d 604, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2855 (1982).

Failure to Care for Needs as Dangerousness. —

Failure of a person to properly care for her medical needs, diet, grooming and general affairs would meet the required test of dangerousness to self. In re Medlin, 59 N.C. App. 33, 295 S.E.2d 604, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2855 (1982).

Eating disorders are subsumed under the definition of mental illness and are not included in the terms “chemical dependency” or “substance abuse.” Laurel Wood of Henderson, Inc. v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 117 N.C. App. 601, 452 S.E.2d 334, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 18 , rev'd in part, 342 N.C. 400 , 464 S.E.2d 44, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 679 (1995).

Unusual eating habits alone do not amount to danger as contemplated in this statute. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

The State may involuntarily commit a person who cannot be relied upon to maintain the proper diet necessary to her welfare and who has no income to cover the expense of food, clothing, fuel or shelter. In re Medlin, 59 N.C. App. 33, 295 S.E.2d 604, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2855 (1982).

Trial court must find three elements present in order to find that respondent is dangerous to others: (1) within the recent past (2) respondent has (a) inflicted serious bodily harm on another, or (b) attempted to inflict serious bodily harm on another, or (c) threatened to inflict serious bodily harm on another, or (d) has acted in such a manner as to create a substantial risk of serious bodily harm to another, and (3) there is a reasonable probability that such conduct will be repeated. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

The statutory definition of “mentally ill,” as applied, was not unconstitutionally vague. In re Hayes, 139 N.C. App. 114, 532 S.E.2d 553, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 820 (2000).

Trial Court Found Appellant Dangerous to Themselves. —

Trial court properly found that a complainant, whom the court recommitted for inpatient treatment, was a danger to the complainant because there was a reasonable possibility that the complainant would have suffered serious physical debilitation in the near future. In re Moore, 234 N.C. App. 37, 758 S.E.2d 33, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 490 (2014).

The trial court correctly found the appellant “dangerous to others,” under this section and G.S. 122C-276.1 , in spite of the appellant’s objection that murders which happened 10 years in the past should not be considered because of their “remoteness,” where, from both evidentiary and medical perspectives, the nature of his crimes was more important than their timing, and where the court’s findings on his dangerousness were also rooted in additional evidence unrelated to his prior crimes, including (1) his past and present mental illness, (2) his behavior since July 17, 1988 (including “slaw incident” during which he became upset and angry with his job supervisor over his co-worker’s premature disposal of coleslaw from the hospital grill where he was employed), and (3) his high likelihood of post-release relapse into multi-substance abuse, which all experts agreed was a trigger for his 1988 psychosis during which he killed four people and wounded several others. In re Hayes, 139 N.C. App. 114, 532 S.E.2d 553, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 820 (2000).

Record supported trial court’s judgment that defendant who was acquitted of multiple homicides by reason of insanity and was committed to a mental hospital did not meet his burden of proving he no longer had a mental illness and was not dangerous. In re Hayes, 151 N.C. App. 27, 564 S.E.2d 305, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 648 (2002).

Present statutory definition of “dangerous to others” does not require a finding of overt acts. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

Evidence was competent to support the trial court’s conclusions that respondent was mentally ill and dangerous to himself within the statutory definitions of those terms. In re Lowery, 110 N.C. App. 67, 428 S.E.2d 861, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 405 (1993).

“Recent Past” Same as “Relevant Past.” —

The Court of Appeals construed the term “recent past” to mean “relevant past”; as such, violent acts committed by mental patient within the six months prior to the district court hearing were the “relevant past.” Davis v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 121 N.C. App. 105, 465 S.E.2d 2, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 1049 (1995).

Former G.S. 122-58.1 et seq., and the related definition of mental illness under former G.S. 122-36 were not unconstitutionally vague. In re Salem, 31 N.C. App. 57, 228 S.E.2d 649, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 1902 (1976).

Facts Supporting Finding as to Mental Illness. —

The facts which the court recorded as supporting its ultimate findings, that respondent had delusions as to the extent of the danger posed by the Ku Klux Klan, that she misinterpreted stimuli, and that she was out of touch with reality, might have furnished some support for the ultimate finding that she was mentally ill, but they furnished no support for the court’s alternative finding that she was inebriate. In re Hogan, 32 N.C. App. 429, 232 S.E.2d 492, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1965 (1977).

The appellant could be found “mentally ill” although he was neither psychotic nor drug or alcohol dependent. In re Hayes, 139 N.C. App. 114, 532 S.E.2d 553, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 820 (2000).

Involuntary commitment of an individual under G.S. 122C-268(j) was improper because, even assuming that the trial court successfully incorporated the contents of the report by the individual’s doctor into its order, the order was insufficient to support the involuntary commitment because (1) the trial court’s findings reflected the individual’s mental illness, but they did not indicate that the individual’s illness or any of the individual’s symptoms would persist and endanger the individual within the near future pursuant to G.S. 122C-3(11)(a)(1) ; and (2) the trial court’s findings were insufficient to support its conclusion that the individual was dangerous to others pursuant to G.S. 122C-3(11)(b). In re Whatley, 224 N.C. App. 267, 736 S.E.2d 527, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1464 (2012).

Prisoners receiving mental health care were not covered by subsection (g) of former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62); the statute applied only to mental health patients who were not imprisoned with the Department of Corrections. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

With respect to the rights of prisoners receiving care in facilities operated by the Department of Human Resources [now Department of Health and Human Services], G.S. 143B-261.1 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto apply, rather than former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62), as they do to those prisoners who remain in prison for their mental health care. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

Mental Health Records Previously Admitted Into Evidence In Parental Rights Termination Case. —

Trial court did not err by considering mental health records of a mother contained within the underlying file and previously admitted into evidence in proceedings to terminate her parental rights, because the mental health records challenged by the mother were originally admitted into evidence during a permanency planning review hearing and were not challenged by the mother at that time. In re J.B., 172 N.C. App. 1, 616 S.E.2d 264, 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1589 (2005).

Facts Negating Finding as to Mental Retardation. —

Where the defendant had an IQ of 70 and presented evidence that he was employed and was able to function in society, the evidence negated a finding that he had deficit adaptive behavior. The defendant did not show he was mentally retarded. State v. Best, 342 N.C. 502 , 467 S.E.2d 45, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 7 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 878, 117 S. Ct. 203, 136 L. Ed. 2d 139, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 5631 (1996).

Insufficient Support for Determination that Patient was Dangerous. —

Involuntary commitment order was error because the order contained insufficient findings, as specifically required by G.S. 122C-268(j), to support the trial court’s determination that the patient was dangerous to himself and to others; statements in a physician’s report, incorporated by the order, that the patient was a 56-year-old white male, with a history of alcohol abuse/dependence, admitted with manic episode, and who continued to be symptomatic with limited insight regarding his illness, were not sufficient to support the trial court’s findings. In re Booker, 193 N.C. App. 433, 667 S.E.2d 302, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1808 (2008).

Trial court erred in ordering the involuntary commitment of the respondent because the evidence in the record on appeal was insufficient to satisfy the statutory criteria since there was no evidence that the respondent’s refusal to take his medication created a serious health risk in the near future, an expert’s only testimony concerning the respondent’s “nourishment” was that he lost some “unknown amount” of weight, but that his current weight was safe, and the respondent’s threat to sue his guardian and his alleged aggressive, but non-violent, actions toward the hospital staff could not be viewed as a threat to inflict “serious bodily harm.” In re W.R.D., 248 N.C. App. 512, 790 S.E.2d 344, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 806 (2016).

Trial court erred in involuntarily committing the respondent because, while the trial court’s findings reflected the respondent’s mental illness, there was no finding of the respondent suffering serious physical debilitation within the near future unless adequate treatment was given or that there was a reasonable probability of suicide unless adequate treatment was given. In re J.P.S., 264 N.C. App. 58, 823 S.E.2d 917, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 158 (2019).

There was no evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that respondent was dangerous to others because the psychologist did not state any opinion that respondent was dangerous to others, only that she was a danger to herself, and the hospital witness did not testify that respondent had threatened anyone or presented any danger to others. In re J.C.D., 265 N.C. App. 441, 828 S.E.2d 186, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 483 (2019).

Respondent’s involuntary commitment was erroneous as the findings of fact did not support the trial court’s conclusion that she was dangerous to herself because a physician’s testimony showed that, as of the hearing date, respondent was stabilized, medicated, and not suffering from any acute symptoms; although she had been a danger to herself in the past, that history alone could not support a finding that she would be a danger to herself in the future; her four psychiatric stays within the past two years and her schizophrenia did not support the conclusion she would be a danger to herself within the near future; and there was no evidence that her refusal to take her medication created a serious health risk in the near future. In re N.U., 270 N.C. App. 427, 840 S.E.2d 296, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 197 (2020).

In a case in which a trial court recommitted a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment, the patient unsuccessfully challenged the sufficiency of the findings under G.S. 122C-263(d)(1)(c) regarding whether, without treatment, his psychiatric condition would deteriorate and predictably result in dangerousness. The trial court’s written findings, coupled with the findings incorporated from a doctor’s report, were sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that, based on the patient’s psychiatric history, he was in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness. In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

In a case in which a patient challenged a trial court’s order recommitting him to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment, the patient unsuccessfully argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings that his condition would deteriorate and that he could likely become dangerous because, as the patient argued, his treating physician’s testimony regarding the patient’s history of violence and communication of threats was incompetent evidence because it was based on hearsay. The physician testified as an expert witness, and it was appropriate for him to base an expert opinion on both his personal examination of the patient and other information included in the patient’s official medical records, and G.S. 122C-263(d)(1)(c) required the physician to rely on the patient’s psychiatric history. In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Respondent was dangerous to himself where the evidence showed that he was unable without constant professional 24 hour supervision and medical treatment to satisfy his needs for personal or medical care, self-protection, and safety, he was grossly delusional, paranoid, and manic, he was likely to suffer debilitation without treatment, his loss of touch with reality made it difficult for him to exercise judgment in the conduct of his daily affairs, and he was at risk of harm outside the medical facility. Thus, there was a reasonable probability that he would suffer imminent harm absent commitment. In re B.S., 270 N.C. App. 414, 840 S.E.2d 308, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 200 (2020).

Trial court did not err in entering an involuntary commitment order because it properly found that a patient was a danger to himself; the trial court’s finding the patient’s ACT team was unable to sufficiently care for his dental and nourishment needs created the nexus between his mental illness and future harm to himself, and the trial court heard evidence of actions the patient was unable to control and of his severely impaired insight as to his own condition. In re C.G., 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (July 20, 2021).

Trial court’s findings of fact sufficiently showed that respondent was a danger to himself and others given his schizoaffective disorder, past hospitalizations, history of suicidal ideations, fast and incoherent speech, and recent expression of suicidal ideations toward his mother. In re Q.J., 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 358 (July 20, 2021).

Trial court’s findings were insufficient to support the conclusion that appellant was dangerous to others because it failed to find facts showing appellant to be dangerous to others, and the record did not disclose such facts. A psychiatrist failed to indicate which statutory basis supported further involuntary commitment, the examination form did not indicate whether appellant was a threat to himself or others and did not include any basis for deeming him dangerous, and she testified that she had not forced medication on appellant because he was not a danger to himself or others. In re K.V., 2021-NCCOA-492, 279 N.C. App. 368, 864 S.E.2d 870, 2021- NCCOA-492, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 514 (2021).

Findings Sufficient. —

Trial court’s findings of fact sufficiently showed that respondent was a danger to himself and others given his schizoaffective disorder, past hospitalizations, history of suicidal ideations, fast and incoherent speech, and recent expression of suicidal ideations toward his mother. In re Q.J., 2021-NCCOA-346, 278 N.C. App. 452, 863 S.E.2d 424, 2021- NCCOA-346, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 358 (2021).

Trial court did not err in entering an involuntary commitment order because it properly found that a patient was a danger to himself; the trial court’s finding the patient’s ACT team was unable to sufficiently care for his dental and nourishment needs created the nexus between his mental illness and future harm to himself, and the trial court heard evidence of actions the patient was unable to control and of his severely impaired insight as to his own condition. In re C.G., 2021-NCCOA-344, 278 N.C. App. 416, 863 S.E.2d 237, 2021- NCCOA-344, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (2021).

§ 122C-4. Use of phrase “client or the legally responsible person”.

  1. Except as otherwise provided by law, whenever in this Chapter the phrase “client or the legally responsible person” is used, and the client is a minor or an incompetent adult, the duty or right involved shall be exercised not by the client, but by the legally responsible person.
  2. Except as otherwise provided by law, whenever in this Chapter the phrase “client or the legally responsible person” is used, and the client is an incapable adult, the duty or right involved shall be exercised by a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney, if one exists, or by the client as expressed in a valid advance instruction for mental health treatment, if one exists. If no health care power of attorney or advance instruction for mental health treatment exists, the legally responsible person for an incapable adult who has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes shall be one of the persons listed in subdivisions (3) through (7) of subsection (c) of G.S. 90-21.13 , to be selected based on the priority order indicated in said subdivisions (3) through (7).

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 2; 2019-240, s. 26(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 2, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 2, substituted “the legally” for “his legally” in the section catchline; designated the previously existing provisions as subsection (a), and substituted “the legally” for “his legally” in the middle; and added subsection (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(b), effective November 6, 2019, in subsection (b), in the first sentence, deleted “who has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes” preceding “the duty” and deleted “not by the client but” following “be exercised.”

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

A minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation from a 24-hour facility, as that term is defined in G.S. 122C-3(14)g, does not have the right to choose at his or her own expense or the expense of his or her legally responsible person, an attorney of the minor client’s choice. The legally responsible person is the only one who can choose an attorney for the minor client unless the minor is over the age of 16 and emancipated. See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

§ 122C-5. Report on restraint and seclusion.

The Secretary shall report annually on October 1 to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services on the following for the immediately preceding fiscal year:

  1. The level of compliance of each facility with applicable State and federal laws, rules, and regulations governing the use of restraints and seclusion. The information shall indicate areas of highest and lowest levels of compliance.
  2. The total number of facilities that reported deaths under G.S. 122C-31 , the number of deaths reported by each facility, the number of deaths investigated pursuant to G.S. 122C-31 , and the number found by the investigation to be related to the use of restraint or seclusion.

History. 2000-129, s. 3(b); 2003-58, s. 1; 2011-291, s. 2.40.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-291, s. 2.40, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in the introductory paragraph.

§ 122C-6. Smoking prohibited; penalty.

  1. Smoking is prohibited inside facilities licensed under this Chapter. As used in this section, “smoking” means the use or possession of any lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, or other lighted smoking product. As used in this section, “inside” means a fully enclosed area.
  2. The person who owns, manages, operates, or otherwise controls a facility subject to this section shall:
    1. Conspicuously post signs clearly stating that smoking is prohibited inside the facility. The signs may include the international “No Smoking” symbol, which consists of a pictorial representation of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across it.
    2. Direct any person who is smoking inside the facility to extinguish the lighted smoking product.
    3. Provide written notice to individuals upon admittance that smoking is prohibited inside the facility and obtain the signature of the individual or the individual’s representative acknowledging receipt of the notice.
  3. The Department may impose an administrative penalty not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each violation on any person who owns, manages, operates, or otherwise controls a facility licensed under this Chapter and fails to comply with subsection (b) of this section. A violation of this section constitutes a civil offense only and is not a crime.
  4. This section does not apply to State psychiatric hospitals.

History. 2007-459, s. 3.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-459, s. 5, made this section effective October 1, 2007, and applicable to violations committed on or after that date.

Session Laws 2007-459, s. 5, also provides in part: “G.S. 131D-4.4(c)(3), 131E-114.3(b)(3), and 122C-6(b)(3), as enacted by this act, apply to individuals admitted to the facility on or after October 1, 2007.”

§§ 122C-7 through 122C-9.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 1A. MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program.

(This article has a contingent effective date)

§ 122C-10. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program.

The General Assembly finds that many consumers of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services are uncertain about their rights and responsibilities and how to access the public service system to obtain appropriate care and treatment. The General Assembly recognizes the importance of ensuring that consumers have information about the availability of services and access to resources to obtain timely quality care. There is established the MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program. The purpose of this Program is to provide consumers, their families, and providers with the information and advocacy needed to locate appropriate services, resolve complaints, or address common concerns and promote community involvement. It is further the intent of the General Assembly that the Department, within available resources and pursuant to its duties under this Chapter, ensure that the performance of the mental health care system in this State is closely monitored, reviews are conducted, findings and recommendations and reports are made, and that local and systemic problems are identified and corrected when necessary to promote the rights and interests of all consumers of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2001-437, s. 4, as amended by Session Laws 2002-126, s. 10.30, as amended by Session Laws 2003-284, s. 10.10, as amended by Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.27, provides that s. 2 of the act, which added this Article, becomes effective July 1 of the fiscal year for which funds are appropriated by the General Assembly for that purpose.

§ 122C-11. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program/definitions.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, as used in this Article:

  1. “MH/DD/SA” means mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
  2. “State Consumer Advocate” means the individual charged with the duties and functions of the State MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program established under this Article.
  3. “State Consumer Advocacy Program” means the State MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program.
  4. “Local Consumer Advocate” means an individual employed and certified by the State Consumer Advocate to perform the duties and functions of the MH/DD/SA Local Consumer Advocacy Program in accordance with this Article.
  5. “Local Consumer Advocacy Program” means a local MH/DD/SA Local Consumer Advocacy Program.
  6. “Consumer” means an individual who is a client or a potential client of public services from a State or area facility.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-12. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program.

The Secretary shall establish a State MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program office in the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The Secretary shall appoint a State Consumer Advocate. In selecting the State Consumer Advocate, the Secretary shall consider candidates recommended by citizens’ organizations representing the interest of individuals with needs for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. The State Consumer Advocate may hire individuals to assist in executing the State Consumer Advocacy Program and to act on the State Consumer Advocate’s behalf. The State Consumer Advocate shall have expertise and experience in MH/DD/SA, including expertise and experience in advocacy. The Attorney General shall provide legal staff and advice to the State Consumer Advocate.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-13. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State Consumer Advocate duties.

The State Consumer Advocate shall:

  1. Establish Local Quality Care Consumer Advocacy Programs described in G.S. 122C-14 and appoint the Local Consumer Advocates.
  2. Establish certification criteria and minimum training requirements for Local Consumer Advocates.
  3. Certify Local Consumer Advocates. The certification requirements shall include completion of the minimum training requirements established by the State Consumer Advocate.
  4. Provide training and technical Advocacy to Local Consumer Advocates.
  5. Establish procedures for processing and resolving complaints both at the State and local levels.
  6. Establish procedures for coordinating complaints with local human rights committees and the State protection and advocacy agency.
  7. Establish procedures for appropriate access by the State and Local Consumer Advocates to State, area authority, and county program facilities and records to ensure MH/DD/SA. The procedures shall include, but not be limited to, interviews of owners, consumers, and employees of State, area authority, and county program facilities, and on-site monitoring of conditions and services. The procedures shall ensure the confidentiality of these records and that the identity of any complainant or consumer will not be disclosed except as otherwise provided by law.
  8. Provide information to the public about available MH/DD/SA services, complaint procedures, and dispute resolution processes.
  9. Analyze and monitor the development and implementation of federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and policies relating to consumers and recommend changes as considered necessary to the Secretary.
  10. Analyze and monitor data relating to complaints or concerns about access and issues to identify significant local or systemic problems, as well as opportunities for improvement, and advise and assist the Secretary in developing policies, plans, and programs for ensuring that the quality of services provided to consumers is of a uniformly high standard.
  11. Submit a report annually to the Secretary, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Joint Legislative Health Care Oversight Committee containing data and findings regarding the types of problems experienced and complaints reported by or on behalf of providers, consumers, and employees of providers, as well as recommendations to resolve identified issues and to improve the administration of MH/DD/SA facilities and the delivery of MH/DD/SA services throughout the State.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27; 2011-291, s. 2.41.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-291, s. 2.41, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in subdivision (11).

§ 122C-14. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) Local Consumer Advocate; duties.

  1. The State Consumer Advocate shall establish a Local MH/DD/SA Consumer Advocacy Program in locations in the State to be designated by the Secretary. In determining where to locate the Local Consumer Advocacy Programs, the Secretary shall ensure reasonable consumer accessibility to the Local Consumer Advocates. Local Consumer Advocates shall administer the Local Consumer Advocacy Programs. The State Consumer Advocate shall appoint a Local Consumer Advocate for each of the Local Consumer Advocacy Programs. The State Consumer Advocate shall supervise the Local Consumer Advocates.
  2. Pursuant to policies and procedures established by the State Consumer Advocate, the Local Consumer Advocate shall:
    1. Assist consumers and their families with information, referral, and advocacy in obtaining appropriate services.
    2. Assist consumers and their families in understanding their rights and remedies available to them from the public service system.
    3. Serve as a liaison between consumers and their families and facility personnel and administration.
    4. Promote the development of consumer and citizen involvement in addressing issues relating to MH/DD/SA.
    5. Visit the State, area authority, or county program facilities to review and evaluate the quality of care provided to consumers and submit findings to the State Consumer Advocate.
    6. Work with providers and consumers and their families or advocates to resolve issues of common concern.
    7. Participate in regular Local Consumer Advocate training established by the State Consumer Advocate.
    8. Report regularly to area authorities and county programs, county and area authority boards, and boards of county commissioners about the Local Consumer Advocate’s activities, including the findings made pursuant to subdivision (5) of this subsection.
    9. Provide training and technical assistance to counties, area authority boards, and providers concerning responding to consumers, evaluating quality of care, and determining availability of services and access to resources.
    10. Coordinate activities with local human rights committees based on procedures developed by the State Consumer Advocate.
    11. Provide information to the public on MH/DD/SA issues.
    12. Perform any other related duties as directed by the State Consumer Advocate.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-15. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; authority to enter; communication with residents, clients, patients; review of records.

  1. For purposes of this section, G.S. 122C-16 and G.S. 122C-17 , “Consumer Advocate” means either the State Consumer Advocate or any Local Consumer Advocate.
  2. In performing the Consumer Advocate’s duties, a Consumer Advocate shall have access at all times to any State or area facility and shall have reasonable access to any consumer or to an employee of a State or area facility. Entry and access to any consumer or to an employee shall be conducted in a manner that will not significantly disrupt the provision of services. If a facility requires visitor registration, then the Consumer Advocate shall register.
  3. In performing the Consumer Advocate’s duties, a Consumer Advocate may communicate privately and confidentially with a consumer. A consumer shall not be compelled to communicate with a Consumer Advocate. When initiating communication, a Consumer Advocate shall inform the consumer of the Consumer Advocate’s purpose and that a consumer may refuse to communicate with the Consumer Advocate. A Consumer Advocate also may communicate privately and confidentially with State and area facility employees in performing the Consumer Advocate’s duties.
  4. Notwithstanding G.S. 8-53 , G.S. 8-53.3 , or any other law relating to confidentiality of communications involving a consumer, in the course of performing the Consumer Advocate’s duties, the Consumer Advocate may access any information, whether recorded or not, concerning the admission, discharge, medication, treatment, medical condition, or history of any consumer to the extent permitted by federal law and regulations. Notwithstanding any State law pertaining to the privacy of personnel records, in the course of the Consumer Advocate’s duties, the Consumer Advocate shall have access to personnel records of employees of State, area authority, or county program facilities.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-16. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; resolution of complaints.

  1. Following receipt of a complaint, a Consumer Advocate shall attempt to resolve the complaint using, whenever possible, informal mediation, conciliation, and persuasion.
  2. If a complaint concerns a particular consumer, the consumer may participate in determining what course of action the Consumer Advocate should take on the consumer’s behalf. If the consumer has an opinion concerning a course of action, the Consumer Advocate shall consider the consumer’s opinion.
  3. Following receipt of a complaint, a Consumer Advocate shall contact the service provider to allow the service provider the opportunity to respond, provide additional information, or initiate action to resolve the complaint.
  4. Complaints or conditions adversely affecting consumers that cannot be resolved in the manner described in subsection (a) of this section shall be referred by the Consumer Advocate to the appropriate licensing agency under Article 2 of this Chapter.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-17. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; confidentiality.

  1. Except as required by law, a Consumer Advocate shall not disclose the following:
    1. Any confidential or privileged information obtained pursuant to G.S. 122C-15 unless the affected individual authorizes disclosure in writing; or
    2. The name of anyone who has furnished information to a Consumer Advocate unless the individual authorizes disclosure in writing.
  2. Violation of this section is a Class 3 misdemeanor, punishable only by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).
  3. All confidential or privileged information obtained under this section and the names of persons providing information to a Consumer Advocate are exempt from disclosure pursuant to Chapter 132 of the General Statutes. Access to substance abuse records and redisclosure of protected information shall be in compliance with federal confidentiality laws protecting medical records.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-18. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; retaliation prohibited.

No one shall discriminate or retaliate against any person, provider, or facility because the person, provider, or facility in good faith complained or provided information to a Consumer Advocate.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-19. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; immunity from liability.

  1. The State and Local Consumer Advocate shall be immune from liability for the good faith performance of official Consumer Advocate duties.
  2. A State or area facility, its employees, and any other individual interviewed by a Consumer Advocate are immune from liability for damages resulting from disclosure of any information or documents to a Consumer Advocate pursuant to this Article.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§ 122C-20. (This article has a contingent effective date — see note) State/Local Consumer Advocate; penalty for willful interference.

Willful interference by an individual other than the consumer or the consumer’s representative with the State or a Local Consumer Advocate in the performance of the Consumer Advocate’s official duties is a Class 1 misdemeanor.

History. 2001-437, s. 2; 2002-126, s. 10.30; 2003-284, s. 10.10; 2005-276, s. 10.27.

Editor’s Note.

For contingent effective date, see editor’s note at G.S. 122C-10 .

§§ 122C-20.1 through 122C-20.4.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 1B. Transitions to Community Living.

Part 1. North Carolina Supportive Housing Program.

§ 122C-20.5. Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this Article:

  1. Individual with serious and persistent mental illness or SPMI. — A person who is 18 years of age or older who meets one of the following criteria:
    1. Has a mental illness or disorder that is so severe and chronic that it prevents or erodes development of functional capacities in primary aspects of daily life such as personal hygiene and self-care, decision making, interpersonal relationships, social transactions, learning, and recreational activities.
    2. Is receiving Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability Income due to mental illness.
  2. Individual with serious mental illness or SMI. — An individual who is 18 years of age or older with a mental illness or disorder that is described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, that impairs or impedes functioning in one or more major areas of living and is unlikely to improve without treatment, services, supports, or all three. The term does not include a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or dementia.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

Editor’s Note.

The definitions were enacted by Session Laws 2013-397, s. 6(a), in reverse order, and were redesignated at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

§ 122C-20.6. Department to establish statewide supportive housing program for individuals transitioning into community living; purpose.

The Department of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the North Carolina Housing Finance Agency, shall establish and administer a tenant-based rental assistance program known as the North Carolina Supportive Housing Program. The purpose of the program is to transition individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness or serious and persistent mental illness from institutional settings to more integrated community-based settings appropriate to meet their needs. Under the program, the Department, in consultation with the North Carolina Housing Finance Agency and LME/MCOs, shall arrange for program participants to be transitioned to housing slots available through the program with all the rights and obligations created by a landlord-tenant relationship.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.7. Administration of housing subsidies for supportive housing.

The Department may enter into a contract with a private vendor to serve as the housing subsidy administrator for the North Carolina Supportive Housing Program with responsibility for distributing rental vouchers and community living vouchers to program participants based on a formula developed by the Department.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.8. Eligibility requirements for NC Supportive Housing Program.

The Division of Aging and Adult Services shall adopt rules to establish eligibility requirements for the program. The eligibility requirements shall, at a minimum, include income eligibility requirements and requirements to give priority for program participation and transition services to individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness or serious and persistent mental illness who are currently residing in institutional settings. The Division may adopt temporary rules necessary to implement this Article.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.9. In-reach activities for supportive housing.

The Department shall have ongoing responsibility for developing and distributing a list of potentially eligible program participants for each LME/MCO by catchment area. Upon receipt of this information, each LME/MCO shall have ongoing responsibility for prioritizing the list of individuals to whom it will provide in-reach activities in order to (i) arrange an in-person meeting with potentially eligible participants to determine their eligibility and level of interest and (ii) report back to the Department on the LME/MCO’s recommended list of program participants on a daily basis. Upon receipt of an LME/MCO’s recommended list of program participants, the Department shall make a final determination of eligibility.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.10. Allocation of supportive housing slots to LME/MCOs.

The Department shall annually determine the number of housing slots to be allocated to each LME/MCO as follows:

  1. Each year, the Department shall distribute at least fifty percent (50%) of the housing slots available through this program equally among all LME/MCOs.
  2. The Department shall award additional housing slots to LME/MCOs based on local need, as determined by the information provided by LME/MCOs to the Department in accordance with G.S. 122C-20.9 .

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.11. Transition of program participants into housing slots.

The LME/MCO shall develop a written transition plan for each individual determined to be eligible and interested in participating in the North Carolina Supportive Housing Program. The transition plan for the approved housing slot shall identify at least all of the following:

  1. Available housing units that meet the individual’s needs.
  2. Any transition services that will be necessary for the individual, including, but not limited to, a one-time transition stability payment, not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) per individual, for up-front move-in costs approved by the Department or the housing subsidy administrator.
  3. Solutions to potential barriers to the individual’s successful transition to community-based supported housing.
  4. Any other information the Department deems necessary for the individual program participant’s successful transition into community-based supported housing.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.12. Transition services.

LME/MCOs shall provide individualized transition services to program participants within their respective catchment areas for the 90-day period following the individual’s transition into a housing slot provided through the program.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.13. Tenancy support services.

The Department or the housing subsidy administrator shall provide ongoing tenancy support services to program participants.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.14. Approval of landlords and housing units.

The Department shall develop an application process for owners of housing units seeking to participate in the program as landlords. The application process shall, at a minimum, include an inspection of the owners’ selected housing units and a requirement that owners receive educational information from the Department about the North Carolina Supportive Housing Program prior to being approved as landlords.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.15. Annual reporting on NC Supportive Housing Program.

Annually on October 1, the Department shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services of the General Assembly on the number of individuals within each LME/MCO catchment area who transitioned into housing slots available through the North Carolina Supportive Housing Program during the preceding calendar year. The report shall include a breakdown of all funds expended by each LME/MCO for transitioning these individuals into the housing slots.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

§ 122C-20.16. NC Supportive Housing Program not an entitlement.

The Department shall not be required to provide housing slots to individuals beyond the number that can be supported by funds appropriated by the General Assembly for this purpose. The supportive housing program established under this Part, whether administered by the Department or a private entity, is not an entitlement, and nothing in this Part shall create any property right.

History. 2013-397, s. 6(a).

Part 2. [Reserved]. [Repealed]

Article 2. Licensure of Facilities for Individuals With Mental Health Disorders, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Use Disorders.

§ 122C-21. Purpose.

The purpose of this Article is to provide for licensure of facilities for the individuals with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, and substance use disorders by the development, establishment, and enforcement of basic rules governing both of the following:

  1. The provision of services to individuals who receive services from licensable facilities as defined by this Chapter.
  2. The construction, maintenance, and operation of these licensable facilities that in the light of existing knowledge will ensure safe and adequate treatment of these individuals. The Department shall ensure that licensable facilities are inspected every two years to determine compliance with physical plant and life-safety requirements.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 4; 2005-276, s. 10.40A(c); 2021-77, s. 7.4(b).

Cross References.

As to penalties for violations of this Article, see G.S. 122C-24.1 .

Tiered State-County Special Assistance Pilot.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12D.2(a)-(e), provides: “(a) As used in this section, the term ‘group home’ means any facility that (i) is licensed under Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, (ii) meets the definition of a supervised living facility under 10A NCAC 27G.5601(c)(1) or 10A NCAC 27G.5601(c)(3), and (iii) serves adults whose primary diagnosis is mental illness or a developmental disability but may also have other diagnoses.

“(b) It is the intent of the General Assembly to create a State-County Special Assistance program that allows counties greater flexibility in serving individual needs within their communities and greater control over how county funds are used to support this program in light of the fact that counties are required to pay for fifty percent (50%) of the costs of this program. To that end, the General Assembly directs the Department of Health and Human Services to establish a pilot program in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.

“(c) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services (Department), shall establish a pilot program to implement a tiered rate structure within the State-County Special Assistance program for individuals residing in group homes, in-home living arrangements, and assisted living residences as defined in G.S. 131D-2.1 . The purposes of the pilot program are to (i) determine the best way to implement a block grant for this program statewide and (ii) test the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a tiered rate structure to address program participants’ intensity of need, including medication management. The Department shall select a minimum of four and a maximum of six counties to participate in the pilot program, at least two of which shall be rural counties and at least two of which shall be urban counties. The pilot program shall (i) be implemented during the 2013-2014 fiscal year, (ii) operate for at least a 12-month period, and (iii) comply with any agreements in effect between the State of North Carolina and the United States government.

“(d) The Department shall implement the pilot program in collaboration with the local departments of social services in the counties selected for participation. As part of the pilot program, the selected counties shall receive a State General Fund allocation as a block grant to be equally matched with county general funds. The General Fund allocation provided to each county participating in the pilot program shall be calculated based upon the average annual Special Assistance expenditures for that county during the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, adjusted for the amount of projected annual growth in the number of Special Assistance recipients in that county during the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium. These funds may be used to pay for room, board, and personal care services, including medication management, for individuals eligible to receive State-County Special Assistance, subject to the following limitations and requirements:

“(1) These funds shall not be used to cover any portion of the cost of providing services for which an individual receives Medicaid coverage.

“(2) The pilot program shall comply with all federal and State requirements governing the existing State-County Special Assistance program, except that Section 12D.3 does not apply to the pilot program.

“(3) The tiered rate structure shall be based upon intensity of need, and an individual’s placement within a tier shall be based upon an independent assessment of the individual’s need for room, board, and assistance with activities of daily living, including medication management.

“(e) By February 1, 2014, the Department shall submit a progress report on the implementation and operation of the pilot program, including any obstacles to implementation; and by February 1, 2015, the Department shall submit a final report on the results of the pilot program, along with any recommendations based on these results, to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division. The report due by February 1, 2015, shall include information from all participating counties on at least all of the following:

“(1) The amount of the tiered rates implemented as part of the pilot program.

“(2) The cost methodology for determining these tiered rates.

“(3) The number of individuals participating in the pilot program while residing in a group home.

“(4) The number of individuals participating in the pilot program while residing in an in-home living arrangement.

“(5) The number of individuals participating in the pilot program while residing in an assisted living residence as defined by G.S. 131D-2.1 , broken down by facility type.

“(6) A comparison of the number of recipients of State-County Special Assistance prior to and during the pilot program, broken down by county and living arrangement.

“(7) Any other information the Department deems relevant for determining the best way to implement a block grant statewide for the State-County Special Assistance program.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3A.1(a) provides: “(a) Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply in this Part:

“(1) CDC. — The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“(2) COVID-19. — Coronavirus disease 2019.

“(3) COVID-19 diagnostic test. — A test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to detect the presence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

“(4) COVID-19 emergency. — The period beginning March 10, 2020, and ending on the date the Governor signs an executive order rescinding Executive Order No. 116, Declaration of a State of Emergency to Coordinate Response and Protective Actions to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19.

“(5) COVID-19 antibody test. — A serological blood test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to measure the amount of antibodies or proteins present in the blood when the body is responding to an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3E.3(a)-(c), provides: “(a) Notwithstanding any provision of Article 2 of Chapter 122C, Articles 1 and 3 of Chapter 131D, and Chapter 131E of the General Statutes, or any other provision of law to the contrary, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regulation, and as applicable, local departments of social services, shall suspend all annual and biennial inspections and regular monitoring requirements for licensed facilities under Article 2 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, Articles 1 and 3 of Chapter 131D of the General Statutes, and Articles 5, 6, and 10 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes, and provisions within any rules adopted under these chapters that pertain to the Department or DHSR monitoring, inspection, or investigative requirements, except (i) as DHSR deems necessary to avoid serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to employees, residents, or patients of these facilities or (ii) as directed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“(b) DHSR shall review the compliance history of all facilities licensed under Article 2 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes and Article 1 of Chapter 131D of the General Statutes that were determined to be in violation, assessed penalties, or placed on probation within the six-month period preceding the beginning of the COVID-19 emergency, for noncompliance with rules or statutes or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines regarding infection control or the proper use of personal protective equipment. DHSR shall require employees of these facilities to undergo immediate training designated by DHSR about infection control and the proper use of personal protective equipment. The training required by this section may be conducted online, by video conference, or in such manner as DHSR determines appropriate under the circumstances.

“(c) This section is effective when it becomes law and expires 60 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded, or December 31, 2020, whichever is earlier.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.3(b)-(d), provides:

“(b) The Department of Health and Human Services shall establish a database or expand upon a currently existing database that makes publicly available a searchable listing of all applicable facilities and programs with all of the following information:

“(1) The facility or program name.

“(2) The location, including street and mailing addresses, city, and county, for the facility or program.

“(3) The contact information for the owners, director, or other individual in charge of the facility or program.

“(4) The dates and types of visits conducted by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(5) A description of the findings, including whether a complaint was substantiated or unsubstantiated, and identification of the violation cited if substantiated.

“(6) Any action taken under G.S. 122C-28.1 by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(c) The Department of Health and Human Services shall coordinate with the Department of Insurance to establish a toll-free number or website for individuals, providers, and insurers to use in verifying the licensure status of a facility providing mental health, behavioral health, and substance use disorder services.

“(d) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH‡/SAS), shall collaborate with community organizations, such as the National Alliance for Mental Illness (NAMI), for a public information campaign about the appropriate types of care for individuals with mental health disorders that, at a minimum, includes information on the importance of receiving care from a licensed facility or program with medical personnel licensed by the North Carolina Medical Board.”

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.4(a), effective July 2, 2021, rewrote the Article 2 heading, which formerly read: “Licensure of Facilities for the Mentally Ill, the Developmentally Disabled, and Substance Abusers.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.40A(c), effective July 1, 2005, added the last sentence in subdivision (2).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.4(b), effective July 2, 2021, substituted “individuals with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities” for “mentally ill, developmentally disabled”, and “substance use disorders” for “substance abusers”, inserted “both of the following”, and made stylistic changes.

§ 122C-22. Exclusions from licensure; deemed status. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. All of the following are excluded from the provisions of this Article and are not required to obtain licensure under this Article:
    1. Physicians and psychologists engaged in private office practice.
    2. General hospitals licensed under Article 5 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes, that operate special units for patients with a mental health disorder diagnosis, one or more developmental disabilities, or a substance use disorder.
    3. State and federally operated facilities.
    4. Adult care homes licensed under Chapter 131D of the General Statutes.
    5. Developmental child care centers licensed under Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes.
    6. Persons subject to licensure under rules of the Social Services Commission.
    7. Persons subject to rules and regulations of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation Services.
    8. Facilities that provide occasional respite care for not more than two individuals at a time; provided that the primary purpose of the facility is other than as defined in G.S. 122C-3(14).
    9. Twenty-four-hour nonprofit facilities established for the purposes of shelter care and recovery from alcohol or other substance use disorder through a 12-step, self-help, peer role modeling, and self-governance approach.
    10. Inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse facilities that provide services exclusively to inmates of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, as described in G.S. 148-19.1 .
    11. A charitable, nonprofit, faith-based, adult residential treatment facility that does not receive any federal or State funding and is a religious organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
    12. A home in which up to three adults, two or more having a disability, co-own or co-rent a home in which the persons with disabilities are receiving three or more hours of day services in the home or up to 24 hours of residential services in the home. The individuals who have disabilities cannot be required to move if the individuals change services, change service providers, or discontinue services.
  2. The Commission may adopt rules establishing a procedure whereby a facility that would otherwise require licensure under this Article that is certified by a nationally recognized agency, such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, may be deemed licensed under this Article by the Secretary. Any facility licensed under the provisions of this subsection shall continue to be subject to inspection by the Secretary. The Secretary shall collaborate with relevant agencies to ensure that any facilities deemed licensed under this Article maintain the required certification.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1110, s. 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 13; 1987, c. 345, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 5; 1995, c. 535, s. 7; 1997-506, s. 43; 2000-67, s. 11.25A; 2001-424, s. 25.19(b); 2004-199, s. 32; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2011-202, s. 1; 2012-15, s. 1; 2013-410, s. 11; 2017-186, s. 2(jjjjj); 2021-77, s. 7.3(a).

Cross References.

As to exemption from reporting of death of a client, see G.S. 122C-31(i) .

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(a), provides that inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse facilities that provide services exclusively to inmates of the Department of Correction shall be exempt from licensure by the Department of Health and Human Services under Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. If an inpatient facility provides services to inmates of the Department of Correction and to members of the general public, the portion of the facility that serves inmates shall be exempt from licensure.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(b), provides that any person who contracts to provide inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse services to inmates of the Department of Correction may construct and operate a new chemical dependency or substance abuse facility for that purpose without first obtaining a certificate of need from the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes. However, a new facility or addition developed for that purpose without a certificate of need shall not be licensed pursuant to Chapter 122C of the General Statutes and shall not admit anyone other than inmates unless the owner or operator first obtains a certificate of need.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(c), provides that section 18.8 applies to existing facilities, as well as future facilities contracting with the Department of Correction.

For prior similar legislation, see Session Laws 1995, c. 507, s. 19.9.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 1999.”

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 30.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 1999-2001 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 1999-2001 biennium.”

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 30.4, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.3(b)-(d), provides: “(b) The Department of Health and Human Services shall establish a database or expand upon a currently existing database that makes publicly available a searchable listing of all applicable facilities and programs with all of the following information:

“(1) The facility or program name.

“(2) The location, including street and mailing addresses, city, and county, for the facility or program.

“(3) The contact information for the owners, director, or other individual in charge of the facility or program.

“(4) The dates and types of visits conducted by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(5) A description of the findings, including whether a complaint was substantiated or unsubstantiated, and identification of the violation cited if substantiated.

“(6) Any action taken under G.S. 122C-28.1 by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(c) The Department of Health and Human Services shall coordinate with the Department of Insurance to establish a toll-free number or website for individuals, providers, and insurers to use in verifying the licensure status of a facility providing mental health, behavioral health, and substance use disorder services.

“(d) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS), shall collaborate with community organizations, such as the National Alliance for Mental Illness (NAMI), for a public information campaign about the appropriate types of care for individuals with mental health disorders that, at a minimum, includes information on the importance of receiving care from a licensed facility or program with medical personnel licensed by the North Carolina Medical Board.”

Overnight Respite Services in Adult Day Care Facilities Pilot Program.

The preamble to Session Laws 2011-104, provides: “Whereas, the population of adults who are elderly or disabled in North Carolina is expected to increase, thereby increasing the need for safe and available overnight respite care; and

“Whereas, adult day care provides group care and supervision to adults who may be physically or mentally disabled; and

“Whereas, adult day care provides care and supervision during the day, allowing caregivers a time of respite or allowing caregivers to attend to other duties, including work; and

“Whereas, adult day care allows individuals to remain in their communities and/or in familiar surroundings, thereby prolonging or eliminating the need for placement in a long-term care facility; Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts.”

Session Laws 2011-104, ss. 1-3, as amended by Session Laws 2015-52, ss. 1, 2, provides: “1.(a) Notwithstanding G.S. 131D-6(b), the Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct a pilot program to assess the provision of overnight respite services in adult day care programs. The Secretary shall select a minimum of two, and a maximum of four, stable and successful certified adult day care programs in which to conduct the pilot. At least two of the programs selected shall be operated by an organization that has been offering adult day care in North Carolina since 1980 and has received national recognition including all of the following criteria: designated as a National Model Adult Day Care Center by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, designated as the only Teaching Day Center for recipients of North Carolina adult day care startup funds, received the North Carolina Non-Profit Center’s Non-Profit Sector Stewardship Award for exemplary stewardship of resources, and received Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification.

“(b) The provision of 24-hour care under this act shall not exceed 14 consecutive calendar days, or more than 60 total calendar days, during a 365-day period, for each participant receiving overnight respite services. The capacity of the 24-hour overnight respite program authorized under this act shall not exceed six beds. The State is not authorized to pay for any overnight respite services offered through this pilot, and the pilot shall not be eligible to enroll or otherwise participate in the Medicaid program.

“(c) An adult day care program participating in this pilot shall be currently certified by the Department to provide adult day care. An adult day care program participating in the pilot shall be exempt from adult care home licensure pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 131D of the General Statutes and shall be exempt from licensure under Chapter 131E and Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. The Department of Health and Human Services shall adopt rules to include minimum requirements to ensure the health and safety of adult day care overnight respite participants. These requirements shall specify program management, staffing, building specifications, fire safety, sanitation, nutrition, enrollment, medication management, and program activities. Participant assessments conducted by the adult day care pilot programs shall provide sufficient information to ensure appropriate care and to protect the health and safety of participants but shall not be more onerous than current adult day care assessments. The Division of Health Service Regulation shall have the authority to enforce the rules adopted by the Department. Prior to the provision of overnight respite services, an adult day care program participating in the pilot shall receive an initial inspection by the Division of Health Service Regulation for compliance with the rules. On a basis not less than every six months, the Division of Health Service Regulation shall conduct monitoring visits and shall also be responsible for the investigation of complaints. Each adult day care program participating in the pilot shall periodically report the number of individuals served and the average daily census to the Division of Health Service Regulation, on a schedule determined by the Division. The Division of Health Service Regulation shall have the authority to suspend admissions or terminate the pilot program at any time due to noncompliance with regulatory requirements which has resulted in death or serious physical harm, or when there is a substantial risk that death or serious physical harm will occur.

“2(a). The Department of Health and Human Services shall report on the status of the pilot once a year to the Program Evaluation Division. The Program Evaluation Division shall evaluate the provision of overnight respite services in an adult day care program through the experiences of this pilot. The evaluation shall include whether this pilot was successful as measured by the participants in receipt of overnight respite, the primary caregivers of participants, the adult day care programs participating in the pilot, and the Department of Health and Human Services. On or before October 1, 2014, the Program Evaluation Division shall provide a report to the General Assembly on the feasibility of continuing to provide overnight respite in an adult day care program.

“(b) Following the 2014 report and in order to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the pilot, the Department of Health and Human Services shall coordinate with the Program Evaluation Division regarding the collection of additional information. The Program Evaluation Division shall specify what information the Department needs to collect and the timeframe for reporting the information. Based on information collected through the Department, the Program Evaluation Division shall provide information on each of the items below which will assist in determining whether the provision of overnight respite in an adult day care setting is a worthwhile service.

“(1) The actual number of overnight respite participants per month.

“(2) The percentage of an adult day care entity’s clients that need overnight respite; the percentage of clients that use overnight respite; the percentage of clients using the service more than once if they had a need arise; the percentage of clients using overnight respite that are not regular adult day care clients; and the average monthly bed utilization for overnight respite at each location.

“(3) Customer satisfaction levels for individuals who participate and their families.

“(4) Satisfaction levels of adult day care entities offering overnight respite services.

“(5) The viability of an adult day care offering overnight respite from a cost/benefit standpoint

“(6) The need for overnight respite options in the State currently and the need forecast through 2025.

“(7) The degree to which overnight respite provided in an adult day care setting supports older and disabled adults who wish to live in the least restrictive and supportive setting possible.

“(8) The potential for saving public dollars due to delayed institutionalization when overnight respite is readily available.

“(9) Based on the pilot, a recommendation regarding whether the State should allow the provision of overnight respite in an adult day care setting beyond the pilot.

“(10) A recommendation regarding whether the current regulations are sufficient to ensure the safety and well-being of residents participating in overnight respite in an adult day care setting.

“(11) A recommendation regarding whether adult day care overnight respite should require certification or licensure.

“(12) If a recommendation is made to expand overnight respite in an adult day care setting, the feasibility of funding sources other than private pay, including the possibility of coverage for the service under Medicaid.

“The Program Evaluation Division shall provide an interim report on the criteria specified in this section on or before December 1, 2015, and a final report on or before October 1, 2016, to the Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee and to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services.

“3. This act becomes effective when it becomes law [June 2, 2011]; adult day care programs participating in the pilot shall be selected and have received an initial inspection by January 1, 2012; and this act is repealed June 30, 2017.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-199, s. 32, effective August 17, 2004, added subdivision (a)(11); and made minor stylistic changes.

Session Laws 2011-202, s. 1, effective June 23, 2011, added subdivision (a)(12).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(jjjjj), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (a)(10).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.3(a), effective January 1, 2022, substituted “patients with a mental health disorder diagnosis, one or more developmental disabilities, or a substance use disorder” for “the mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers” in subdivision (a)(2); substituted “substance use disorder” for “drug addiction” in subdivision (a)(9); and in subsection (b), in the first sentence, deleted “licensable” preceding “facility” and inserted “that would otherwise require licensure under this Article that is”, and added the last sentence.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ooo), substituted “the Department of Adult Correction,” for “the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety,” in subdivision (a)(10). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-22. Exclusions from licensure; deemed status. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. All of the following are excluded from the provisions of this Article and are not required to obtain licensure under this Article:
    1. Physicians and psychologists engaged in private office practice.
    2. General hospitals licensed under Article 5 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes, that operate special units for patients with a mental health disorder diagnosis, one or more developmental disabilities, or a substance use disorder.
    3. State and federally operated facilities.
    4. Adult care homes licensed under Chapter 131D of the General Statutes.
    5. Developmental child care centers licensed under Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes.
    6. Persons subject to licensure under rules of the Social Services Commission.
    7. Persons subject to rules and regulations of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation Services.
    8. Facilities that provide occasional respite care for not more than two individuals at a time; provided that the primary purpose of the facility is other than as defined in G.S. 122C-3(14).
    9. Twenty-four-hour nonprofit facilities established for the purposes of shelter care and recovery from alcohol or other substance use disorder through a 12-step, self-help, peer role modeling, and self-governance approach.
    10. Inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse facilities that provide services exclusively to inmates of the Department of Adult Correction, as described in G.S. 148-19.1 .
    11. A charitable, nonprofit, faith-based, adult residential treatment facility that does not receive any federal or State funding and is a religious organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
    12. A home in which up to three adults, two or more having a disability, co-own or co-rent a home in which the persons with disabilities are receiving three or more hours of day services in the home or up to 24 hours of residential services in the home. The individuals who have disabilities cannot be required to move if the individuals change services, change service providers, or discontinue services.
  2. The Commission may adopt rules establishing a procedure whereby a facility that would otherwise require licensure under this Article that is certified by a nationally recognized agency, such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, may be deemed licensed under this Article by the Secretary. Any facility licensed under the provisions of this subsection shall continue to be subject to inspection by the Secretary. The Secretary shall collaborate with relevant agencies to ensure that any facilities deemed licensed under this Article maintain the required certification.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1110, s. 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 13; 1987, c. 345, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 5; 1995, c. 535, s. 7; 1997-506, s. 43; 2000-67, s. 11.25A; 2001-424, s. 25.19(b); 2004-199, s. 32; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2011-202, s. 1; 2012-15, s. 1; 2013-410, s. 11; 2017-186, s. 2(jjjjj); 2021-77, s. 7.3(a); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ooo).

Cross References.

As to exemption from reporting of death of a client, see G.S. 122C-31(i) .

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(a), provides that inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse facilities that provide services exclusively to inmates of the Department of Correction shall be exempt from licensure by the Department of Health and Human Services under Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. If an inpatient facility provides services to inmates of the Department of Correction and to members of the general public, the portion of the facility that serves inmates shall be exempt from licensure.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(b), provides that any person who contracts to provide inpatient chemical dependency or substance abuse services to inmates of the Department of Correction may construct and operate a new chemical dependency or substance abuse facility for that purpose without first obtaining a certificate of need from the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes. However, a new facility or addition developed for that purpose without a certificate of need shall not be licensed pursuant to Chapter 122C of the General Statutes and shall not admit anyone other than inmates unless the owner or operator first obtains a certificate of need.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 18.8(c), provides that section 18.8 applies to existing facilities, as well as future facilities contracting with the Department of Correction.

For prior similar legislation, see Session Laws 1995, c. 507, s. 19.9.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 1999.”

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 30.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 1999-2001 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 1999-2001 biennium.”

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 30.4, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.3(b)-(d), provides: “(b) The Department of Health and Human Services shall establish a database or expand upon a currently existing database that makes publicly available a searchable listing of all applicable facilities and programs with all of the following information:

“(1) The facility or program name.

“(2) The location, including street and mailing addresses, city, and county, for the facility or program.

“(3) The contact information for the owners, director, or other individual in charge of the facility or program.

“(4) The dates and types of visits conducted by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(5) A description of the findings, including whether a complaint was substantiated or unsubstantiated, and identification of the violation cited if substantiated.

“(6) Any action taken under G.S. 122C-28.1 by the Division of Health Services Regulation.

“(c) The Department of Health and Human Services shall coordinate with the Department of Insurance to establish a toll-free number or website for individuals, providers, and insurers to use in verifying the licensure status of a facility providing mental health, behavioral health, and substance use disorder services.

“(d) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS), shall collaborate with community organizations, such as the National Alliance for Mental Illness (NAMI), for a public information campaign about the appropriate types of care for individuals with mental health disorders that, at a minimum, includes information on the importance of receiving care from a licensed facility or program with medical personnel licensed by the North Carolina Medical Board.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to subdivision (a)(10) of this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ooo), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Overnight Respite Services in Adult Day Care Facilities Pilot Program.

The preamble to Session Laws 2011-104, provides: “Whereas, the population of adults who are elderly or disabled in North Carolina is expected to increase, thereby increasing the need for safe and available overnight respite care; and

“Whereas, adult day care provides group care and supervision to adults who may be physically or mentally disabled; and

“Whereas, adult day care provides care and supervision during the day, allowing caregivers a time of respite or allowing caregivers to attend to other duties, including work; and

“Whereas, adult day care allows individuals to remain in their communities and/or in familiar surroundings, thereby prolonging or eliminating the need for placement in a long-term care facility; Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts.”

Session Laws 2011-104, ss. 1-3, as amended by Session Laws 2015-52, ss. 1, 2, provides: “1.(a) Notwithstanding G.S. 131D-6(b), the Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct a pilot program to assess the provision of overnight respite services in adult day care programs. The Secretary shall select a minimum of two, and a maximum of four, stable and successful certified adult day care programs in which to conduct the pilot. At least two of the programs selected shall be operated by an organization that has been offering adult day care in North Carolina since 1980 and has received national recognition including all of the following criteria: designated as a National Model Adult Day Care Center by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, designated as the only Teaching Day Center for recipients of North Carolina adult day care startup funds, received the North Carolina Non-Profit Center’s Non-Profit Sector Stewardship Award for exemplary stewardship of resources, and received Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification.

“(b) The provision of 24-hour care under this act shall not exceed 14 consecutive calendar days, or more than 60 total calendar days, during a 365-day period, for each participant receiving overnight respite services. The capacity of the 24-hour overnight respite program authorized under this act shall not exceed six beds. The State is not authorized to pay for any overnight respite services offered through this pilot, and the pilot shall not be eligible to enroll or otherwise participate in the Medicaid program.

“(c) An adult day care program participating in this pilot shall be currently certified by the Department to provide adult day care. An adult day care program participating in the pilot shall be exempt from adult care home licensure pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 131D of the General Statutes and shall be exempt from licensure under Chapter 131E and Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. The Department of Health and Human Services shall adopt rules to include minimum requirements to ensure the health and safety of adult day care overnight respite participants. These requirements shall specify program management, staffing, building specifications, fire safety, sanitation, nutrition, enrollment, medication management, and program activities. Participant assessments conducted by the adult day care pilot programs shall provide sufficient information to ensure appropriate care and to protect the health and safety of participants but shall not be more onerous than current adult day care assessments. The Division of Health Service Regulation shall have the authority to enforce the rules adopted by the Department. Prior to the provision of overnight respite services, an adult day care program participating in the pilot shall receive an initial inspection by the Division of Health Service Regulation for compliance with the rules. On a basis not less than every six months, the Division of Health Service Regulation shall conduct monitoring visits and shall also be responsible for the investigation of complaints. Each adult day care program participating in the pilot shall periodically report the number of individuals served and the average daily census to the Division of Health Service Regulation, on a schedule determined by the Division. The Division of Health Service Regulation shall have the authority to suspend admissions or terminate the pilot program at any time due to noncompliance with regulatory requirements which has resulted in death or serious physical harm, or when there is a substantial risk that death or serious physical harm will occur.

“2(a). The Department of Health and Human Services shall report on the status of the pilot once a year to the Program Evaluation Division. The Program Evaluation Division shall evaluate the provision of overnight respite services in an adult day care program through the experiences of this pilot. The evaluation shall include whether this pilot was successful as measured by the participants in receipt of overnight respite, the primary caregivers of participants, the adult day care programs participating in the pilot, and the Department of Health and Human Services. On or before October 1, 2014, the Program Evaluation Division shall provide a report to the General Assembly on the feasibility of continuing to provide overnight respite in an adult day care program.

“(b) Following the 2014 report and in order to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the pilot, the Department of Health and Human Services shall coordinate with the Program Evaluation Division regarding the collection of additional information. The Program Evaluation Division shall specify what information the Department needs to collect and the timeframe for reporting the information. Based on information collected through the Department, the Program Evaluation Division shall provide information on each of the items below which will assist in determining whether the provision of overnight respite in an adult day care setting is a worthwhile service.

“(1) The actual number of overnight respite participants per month.

“(2) The percentage of an adult day care entity’s clients that need overnight respite; the percentage of clients that use overnight respite; the percentage of clients using the service more than once if they had a need arise; the percentage of clients using overnight respite that are not regular adult day care clients; and the average monthly bed utilization for overnight respite at each location.

“(3) Customer satisfaction levels for individuals who participate and their families.

“(4) Satisfaction levels of adult day care entities offering overnight respite services.

“(5) The viability of an adult day care offering overnight respite from a cost/benefit standpoint

“(6) The need for overnight respite options in the State currently and the need forecast through 2025.

“(7) The degree to which overnight respite provided in an adult day care setting supports older and disabled adults who wish to live in the least restrictive and supportive setting possible.

“(8) The potential for saving public dollars due to delayed institutionalization when overnight respite is readily available.

“(9) Based on the pilot, a recommendation regarding whether the State should allow the provision of overnight respite in an adult day care setting beyond the pilot.

“(10) A recommendation regarding whether the current regulations are sufficient to ensure the safety and well-being of residents participating in overnight respite in an adult day care setting.

“(11) A recommendation regarding whether adult day care overnight respite should require certification or licensure.

“(12) If a recommendation is made to expand overnight respite in an adult day care setting, the feasibility of funding sources other than private pay, including the possibility of coverage for the service under Medicaid.

“The Program Evaluation Division shall provide an interim report on the criteria specified in this section on or before December 1, 2015, and a final report on or before October 1, 2016, to the Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee and to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services.

“3. This act becomes effective when it becomes law [June 2, 2011]; adult day care programs participating in the pilot shall be selected and have received an initial inspection by January 1, 2012; and this act is repealed June 30, 2017.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-199, s. 32, effective August 17, 2004, added subdivision (a)(11); and made minor stylistic changes.

Session Laws 2011-202, s. 1, effective June 23, 2011, added subdivision (a)(12).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(jjjjj), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (a)(10).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.3(a), effective January 1, 2022, substituted “patients with a mental health disorder diagnosis, one or more developmental disabilities, or a substance use disorder” for “the mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers” in subdivision (a)(2); substituted “substance use disorder” for “drug addiction” in subdivision (a)(9); and in subsection (b), in the first sentence, deleted “licensable” preceding “facility” and inserted “that would otherwise require licensure under this Article that is”, and added the last sentence.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ooo), substituted “the Department of Adult Correction,” for “the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety,” in subdivision (a)(10). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-23. Licensure.

  1. No person shall establish, maintain, or operate a licensable facility for individuals with mental illnesses, individuals with intellectual or other developmental disabilities, or substance abusers without a current license issued by the Secretary.
  2. Each license is issued to the person only for the premises named in the application and is not transferrable or assignable except with prior written approval of the Secretary.
  3. Any person that intends to establish, maintain, or operate a licensable facility shall apply to the Secretary for a license. The Secretary shall prescribe by rule the contents of the application forms.
  4. The Secretary shall issue a license if the Secretary finds that the person complies with this Article and the rules of the Commission and Secretary.
  5. Initial licenses issued under this section are valid for not more than 15 months. Licenses shall be renewed annually thereafter and shall expire at the end of the calendar year. The expiration date of a license shall be specified on the license when issued. Renewal of a regular license is contingent upon receipt of information required by the Secretary for renewal and continued compliance with this Article and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary. Licenses for facilities that have not served any clients during the previous 12 months are not eligible for renewal.The Secretary may issue a provisional license for a period up to six months to a person obtaining the initial license for a facility. The licensee must demonstrate substantial compliance prior to being issued a full license.A provisional license for a period not to exceed six months may be granted by the Secretary to a person that is temporarily unable to comply with a rule when the noncompliance does not present an immediate threat to the health and safety of the individuals in the licensable facility. During this period the licensable facility shall correct the noncompliance based on a plan submitted to and approved by the Secretary. A provisional license for an additional period of time to meet the noncompliance shall not be issued. (e1) Except as provided in subsection (e2) of this section, the Secretary shall not (i) enroll as a new provider in the North Carolina Medicaid or North Carolina Health Choice programs, (ii) revalidate as an enrolled provider in the Medicaid or NC Health Choice programs during the period of the license revocation or suspension, or (iii) issue a license for a new facility or a new service to any applicant meeting any of the following criteria:
    1. The applicant was the owner, principal, or affiliate of a licensable facility under Chapter 122C, Chapter 131D, or Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes that had its license revoked until 60 months after the date of the revocation.
    2. The applicant is the owner, principal, or affiliate of a licensable facility that was assessed a penalty for a Type A or Type B violation under Article 3 of this Chapter, or any combination thereof, and any one of the following conditions exist:
      1. A single violation has been assessed in the six months prior to the application.
      2. Two violations have been assessed in the 18 months prior to the application and 18 months have not passed from the date of the most recent violation.
      3. Three violations have been assessed in the 36 months prior to the application and 36 months have not passed from the date of the most recent violation.
      4. Four or more violations have been assessed in the 60 months prior to application and 60 months have not passed from the date of the most recent violation.
    3. The applicant is the owner, principal, or affiliate of a licensable facility that had its license summarily suspended or downgraded to provisional status as a result of violations under G.S. 122C 24.1(a) until 60 months after the date of reinstatement or restoration of the license.
    4. The applicant is the owner, principal, or affiliate of a licensable facility that had its license summarily suspended or downgraded to provisional status as a result of violations under Article 1A of Chapter 131D of the General Statutes until 60 months after the date of reinstatement or restoration of the license.

      (e2) The Secretary may enroll a provider described in subsection (e1) of this section if any of the following circumstances apply:

      (1) The applicant is an area program or county program providing services under G.S. 122C-141 , and there is no other provider of the service in the catchment area.

      (2) The Secretary finds that the area program or county program has shown good cause by clear and convincing evidence why the enrollment should be allowed.

      (e3) Licensure or enrollment shall be denied if an applicant’s history as a provider under Chapter 131D, Chapter 122C, or Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes is such that the Secretary has concluded the applicant will likely be unable to comply with licensing or enrollment statutes, rules, or regulations. In the event the Secretary denies licensure or enrollment under this subsection, the reasons for the denial and appeal rights pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 150B shall be given to the provider in writing.

  6. Upon written application and in accordance with rules of the Commission, the Secretary may for good cause waive any of the rules implementing this Article, so long as those rules do not affect the health, safety, or welfare of the individuals within the licensable facility. Decisions made pursuant to this subsection may be appealed by filing a contested case under Article 3 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
  7. The Secretary may suspend the admission of any new clients to a facility licensed under this Article where the conditions of the facility are detrimental to the health or safety of the clients. This suspension shall be for the period determined by the Secretary and shall remain in effect until the Secretary is satisfied that conditions or circumstances merit removal of the suspension. In suspending admissions under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider the following factors:
    1. The degree of sanctions necessary to ensure compliance with this section and rules adopted to implement this subsection.
    2. The character and degree of impact of the conditions at the facility on the health or safety of its clients.

      A facility may contest a suspension of admissions under this subsection in accordance with Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. In contesting the suspension of admissions, the facility must file a petition for a contested case within 20 days after the Department mails notice of suspension of admissions to the licensee.

  8. The Department shall charge facilities licensed under this Chapter a nonrefundable annual base license fee plus a nonrefundable annual per-bed fee as follows:

    Click to view

  9. A social setting detoxification facility or medical detoxification facility subject to licensure under this Chapter shall not deny admission or treatment to an individual based solely on the individual’s inability to pay.

Type of Facility Number of Beds Base Fee Per-Bed Fee Facilities (non-ICF/IID): 0 beds $215.00 $0 1 to 6 beds $305.00 $0 More than 6 beds $475.00 $17.50 ICF/IID Only: 1 to 6 beds $845.00 $0 More than 6 beds $800.00 $17.50

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 60; Rev., s. 4600; C.S., s. 6219; 1945, c. 952, s. 41; 1957, c. 100, ss. 1, 4; 1963, c. 813, s. 1; c. 1166, s. 7; 1965, c. 1178, ss. 1-3; 1969, c. 954; 1973, c. 476, ss. 133, 152; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1983, c. 718, ss. 1, 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 8; 1987, c. 345, ss. 3, 4; 1989, c. 625, s. 6; 2000-55, s. 3; 2002-164, s. 4.1; 2003-284, s. 34.8(a); 2003-294, s. 2; 2003-390, s. 3; 2005-276, ss. 41.2(h), 10.40A(d); 2006-66, s. 10.23; 2009-451, s. 10.76(f); 2021-77, ss. 2, 7.1(b); 2021-88, s. 9(h).

Comprehensive Treatment Services Program.

Session Laws 2007-323, ss. 10.10(a)-(h), (j), (k), provide: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services shall continue the Comprehensive Treatment Services Program for children at risk for institutionalization or other out-of-home placement. The Program shall be implemented by the Department in consultation with the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [now the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety], the Department of Public Instruction, and other affected State agencies. The purpose of the Program is to provide appropriate and medically necessary nonresidential and residential treatment alternatives for children at risk of institutionalization or other out-of-home placement. Program funds shall be targeted for non-Medicaid eligible children. Program funds may also be used to expand a system-of-care approach for services to children and their families statewide. The program shall include the following:

“(1) Behavioral health screening for all children at risk of institutionalization or other out-of-home placement.

“(2) Appropriate and medically necessary nonresidential and residential services for children within the child mental health deaf and hard of hearing target population.

“(3) Appropriate and medically necessary nonresidential and residential treatment services, including placements for sexually aggressive youth.

“(4) Appropriate and medically necessary nonresidential and residential treatment services, including placements for youth needing substance abuse treatment services and children with serious emotional disturbances.

“(5) Multidisciplinary case management services, as needed.

“(6) A system of utilization review specific to the nature and design of the Program.

“(7) Mechanisms to ensure that children are not placed in department of social services custody for the purpose of obtaining mental health residential treatment services.

“(8) Mechanisms to maximize current State and local funds and to expand use of Medicaid funds to accomplish the intent of this Program.

“(9) Other appropriate components to accomplish the Program’s purpose.

“(10) The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services may enter into contracts with residential service providers.

“(11) A system of identifying and tracking children placed outside of the family unit in group homes, therapeutic foster care home settings, and other out-of-home placements.

“(12) The development of a strong infrastructure of interagency collaboration.

“(13) Individualized strengths-based care.

“(b) In order to ensure that children at risk for institutionalization or other out-of-home placement are appropriately served by the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, shall do the following with respect to services provided to these children:

“(1) Provide only those treatment services that are medically necessary.

“(2) Implement utilization review of services provided.

“(3) Adopt the following guiding principles for the provision of services:

“a. Service delivery system must be outcome-oriented and evaluation-based.

“b. Services should be delivered as close as possible to the child’s home.

“c. Services selected should be those that are most efficient in terms of cost and effectiveness.

“d. Services should not be provided solely for the convenience of the provider or the client.

“e. Families and consumers should be involved in decision making throughout treatment planning and delivery.

“f. Services shall be specified, delivered, and monitored through a unified Child and Family Plan incorporating the principles of one-child-one-team-one-plan.

“g. Out-of-home placements for children shall be a last resort and shall include concrete plans to bring the children back to a stable, permanent home, their schools, and their community.

“(4) Implement all of the following cost-reduction strategies:

“a. Preauthorization for all services except emergency services.

“b. Levels of care to assist in the development of treatment plans.

“c. Clinically appropriate services.

“(c) The Department shall collaborate with other affected State agencies such as the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Department of Public Instruction, the Administrative Office of the Courts, and with local departments of social services, area mental health programs, and local education agencies to eliminate cost shifting and facilitate cost-sharing among these governmental agencies with respect to the treatment and placement services.

“(d) The Department shall not allocate funds appropriated for Program services until a Memorandum of Agreement has been executed between the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Public Instruction, and other affected State agencies. The Memorandum of Agreement shall address specifically the roles and responsibilities of the various departmental divisions and affected State agencies involved in the administration, financing, care, and placement of children at risk of institutionalization or other out-of-home placement. The Department shall not allocate funds appropriated in this act for the Program until the Memoranda of Agreement between local departments of social services, area mental health programs, local education agencies, the Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, as appropriate, are executed to effectuate the purpose of the Program. The Memoranda of Agreement shall address issues pertinent to local implementation of the Program, including provision for the immediate availability of student records to a local school administrative unit receiving a child placed in a residential setting outside the child’s home county.

“(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, services under the Comprehensive Treatment Services Program are not an entitlement for non-Medicaid eligible children served by the Program.

“(f) Of the funds appropriated in this act for the Comprehensive Treatment Services Program, the Department of Health and Human Services shall establish a reserve of three percent (3%) to ensure availability of these funds to address specialized needs for children with unique or highly complex problems.

“(g) The Department of Health and Human Services, in conjunction with the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Department of Public Instruction, and other affected agencies, shall report on the following Program information:

“(1) The number and other demographic information of children served.

“(2) The amount and source of funds expended to implement the Program.

“(3) Information regarding the number of children screened, specific placement of children, including the placement of children in programs or facilities outside of the child’s home county, and treatment needs of children served.

“(4) The average length of stay in residential treatment, transition, and return to home.

“(5) The number of children diverted from institutions or other out-of-home placements such as training schools and State psychiatric hospitals and a description of the services provided.

“(6) Recommendations on other areas of the Program that need to be improved.

“(7) Other information relevant to successful implementation of the Program.

“(h) The Department shall report on the following Program funding information:

“(1) The amount of Program funding allocated and expended by each LME.

“(2) The amount of Program funds each LME transferred out of the Program to serve purposes other than those outlined by this Program and an explanation of why LMEs transferred the funding.

“(3) Recommendations to improve the penetration rate of Program funds to serve the intended populations across the State.

“(j) Upon approval of the Legislative Services Commission, the Legislative Services Officer shall assign professional and clerical staff to assist in the work of the Task Force. Professional staff shall be those assigned to subject areas or agencies involving child-serving programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Department of Public Instruction. Clerical staff shall be furnished to the Task Force through the offices of the House of Representatives and Senate Directors of Legislative Assistants.

“(k) The Department shall report on April 1, 2008, and April 1, 2009, on the implementation of subsections (a) through (h) of this section. The reports required under this subsection shall be made to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division.”

For similar provisions, see 2003-294, s. 6(a), and 2005-276, s. 10.25(a)-(g) and (m).

Editor’s Note.

Subsection (i) was originally enacted as subsection (h) by Session Laws 2003-390, s. 3. It was redesignated at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6 is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2007’.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(d), made the amendments to subsection (e1) of this section by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(b), effective July 2, 2021, and applicable to cease and desist letters sent by the Department of Health and Human Services on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, ss. 10.40A(d), effective July 1, 2005, and 41.2(h), effective October 1, 2005, rewrote subsection (e); and in subsection (h), increased the base fees and per-bed fees.

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.23, effective July 1, 2006, in subsection (h), deleted “that have licensed beds” following “under this Chapter,” and rewrote the table listing the per-bed fees.

Session Laws 2009-451, s. 10.76(f), effective the seventh calendar day after the date this act becomes law [August 14, 2009], in subsection (h), in the “Base Fee” column, substituted “$215.00” for “$175.00,” “$305.00” for “$250.00,” “$475.00” for “$350.00,” “$845.00” for “$650.00,” and “$800.00” for “$650.00”, and in the “Per-Bed Fee” column substituted “$17.50” for “$12.50” twice.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 2, effective July 2, 2021, substituted “by filing a contested case under Article 3 of Chapter 150B” for “to the Commission for a hearing in accordance with Chapter 150B” in the last sentence of subsection (f).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(b), rewrote subsection (e1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-88, s. 9(h), effective July 22, 2021, rewrote subsection (a); substituted “is not transferrable” for “shall not be transferrable” in subsection (b); substituted “that intends” for “who intends” in the first sentence of subsection (c); in subsection (e), in the first sentence of the first paragraph, deleted “the authority of” preceding “this section” and substituted “are valid” for “shall be valid,” and, in the last paragraph, substituted “that is temporarily” for “who is temporarily,” and “shall not be” for “may not be” in the last paragraph of subsection (e); inserted “of the General Statutes” in subdivisions (e1)(1), and (e1)(4); rewrote subsection (e3); substituted “so long as” for “provided” in the first sentence of subsection (f); substituted “subsection” for “subsection, and” in subdivision (g)(1); and substituted “(non-ICF/IID)” for “(non-ICF/MR),” and “ICF/IID” for “ICF/MR” in subsection (h).

§ 122C-23.1. Licensure of residential treatment facilities.

  1. The General Assembly finds:
    1. That much of the care for residential treatment facility residents is paid by the State and the counties;
    2. That the cost to the State for care for residents of residential treatment facilities is substantial, and high vacancy rates in residential treatment facilities further increase the cost of care;
    3. That the proliferation of residential treatment facilities results in costly duplication and underuse of facilities and may result in lower quality service;
    4. There is currently no ongoing relationship between some applicants for licensure and local management entities (LMEs) that are responsible for the placement of children and adults in residential treatment facilities; and
    5. That it is necessary to protect the general welfare and lives, health, and property of the people of the State for the local management entity (LME) to verify that additional beds are needed in the LME’s catchment area before new residential treatment facilities are licensed. This process is established to ensure that unnecessary costs to the State do not result, residential treatment facility beds are available where needed, and that individuals who need care in residential treatment facilities may have access to quality care.Based on these findings, the Department of Health and Human Services may license new residential treatment facilities if the applicant for licensure submits with the application a letter of support obtained from the local management entity in whose catchment area the facility will be located. The letter of support shall be submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regulation and Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and shall specify the number of existing beds in the same type of facility in the catchment area and the projected need for additional beds of the same type of facility.
  2. All private psychiatric residential treatment facilities (PRTFs), as defined in G.S. 122C-450(a)(3) , that serve children eligible to attend the public schools in accordance with G.S. 115C-366 , including a student who has been suspended or expelled but otherwise meets the requirements of that statute, shall have a facility-based school as a condition of licensure. Subject to the time limits of subsection (c) of this section, the school shall meet all the requirements of a qualified nonpublic school under Article 39 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes and of a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program as defined in G.S. 122C-450(a)(2) . The requirements of this subsection and subsection (c) of this section do not apply to PRTFs that are approved charter schools pursuant to Article 14A of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes.
  3. The Department of Health and Human Services may issue an initial license to a PRTF that meets all licensure requirements except for the approval of the facility-based school as a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program by the Department of Public Instruction. This initial license is valid for a period of six months, during which time the PRTF shall obtain approval of its facility-based school as a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program by the Department of Public Instruction. If such approval is not obtained before the expiration of the initial license, the Department of Health and Human Services shall review the PRTF’s license for appropriate action. If the PRTF obtains approval as a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program, the Department of Health and Human Services may issue a license for the remainder of the calendar year, and the facility is eligible for annual renewal thereafter.
  4. At any time upon receipt of a written notice from the Department of Public Instruction that a PRTF has not provided or is not providing educational services, or is not reasonably cooperating with the Department of Public Instruction to ensure those services are provided and that compliance with State and federal law is assured, the Department of Health and Human Services shall review the PRTF’s license for appropriate action. The Department of Health and Human Services may issue sanctions including (i) requiring a refund of all State funds disbursed for the provision of educational services for the current fiscal year, (ii) barring future funding for the provision of educational services for the current or following year, or (iii) suspending or revoking the PRTF’s license.
  5. As used in this section, “residential treatment facility” means a “residential facility” as defined in and licensed under this Chapter, but not subject to Certificate of Need requirements under Article 9 of Chapter 131E of the General Statutes.

History. 2005-276, s. 10.40(a); 2007-182, s. 1; 2014-100, s. 8.39(c); 2014-101, s. 7.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-182, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007, substituted “Division of Health Service Regulation” for “Division of Facility Services” near the middle of the last paragraph.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(c), effective July 1, 2014, inserted the subsection (a) designation; added subsections (b) through (d); and redesignated the former last sentence as subsection (e) and substituted “section” for “subsection” therein.

Session Laws 2014-101, s. 7, substituted “Article 14A of Chapter 115C” for “Part 6A of Article 16 of Chapter 115C” in subsection (b). See Editor’s note for effective date and applicability.

§ 122C-24. Adverse action on a license.

  1. The Secretary may deny, suspend, amend, or revoke a license in any case in which the Secretary finds that there has been a substantial failure to comply with any provision of this Article or other applicable statutes or any applicable rule adopted pursuant to these statutes. Action[s] under this section and appeals of those actions shall be in accordance with rules of the Commission and Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
  2. When an appeal is filed concerning the denial, suspension, amendment, or revocation of a license, a copy of the proposal for decision shall be sent to the Chairman of the Commission in addition to the parties specified in G.S. 150B-34 . The Chairman or members of the Commission designated by the Chairman may submit for the Secretary’s consideration written or oral comments concerning the proposal prior to the issuance of a final agency decision in accordance with G.S. 150B-36 .

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, ss. 8-10; 1987, c. 345, s. 5.

Cross References.

As to licensure as a supervised living facility for developmentally disabled adults, see the editor’s notes under G.S. 122C-21 .

Editor’s Note.

The word “Action” at the beginning of the second sentence of subsection (a) was apparently intended to be the word “Actions.”

G.S. 150B-36 , referred to in subsection (b), was repealed by Session Laws 2011-398, s. 20, effective January 1, 2012, and applicable to contested cases commenced on or after that date.

§ 122C-24.1. Penalties; remedies.

  1. Violation Classification and Penalties. —  The Department of Health and Human Services shall impose an administrative penalty in accordance with provisions of this Article on any facility licensed under this Article which is found to be in violation of Article 2 or 3 of this Chapter or applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Citations for violations shall be classified and penalties assessed according to the nature of the violation as follows:
    1. “Type A1 Violation” means a violation by a facility of the regulations, standards, and requirements set forth in Article 2 or 3 of this Chapter or applicable State or federal laws and regulations governing the licensure or certification of a facility which results in death or serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The person making the findings shall do the following:
      1. Orally and immediately inform the facility of the Type A1 Violation and the specific findings.

        a1. Require a written plan of protection regarding how the facility will immediately abate the Type A1 Violation in order to protect clients from further risk or additional harm.

      2. Within 15 working days of the investigation, send a report of the findings to the facility.
      3. Require a plan of correction to be submitted to the Department, based on a written report of the findings, that describes steps the facility will take to achieve and maintain compliance.

        The Department shall impose a civil penalty in an amount not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each Type Al Violation in facilities or programs that serve six or fewer persons. The Department shall impose a civil penalty in an amount not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) nor more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each Type A1 Violation in facilities or programs that serve seven or more persons. Where a facility has failed to correct a Type A1 Violation, the Department shall access the facility a civil penalty in the amount of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day that the violation continues beyond the time specified for correction. The Department or its authorized representative shall determine whether the violation has been corrected.

        (1a) “Type A2 Violation” means a violation by a facility of the regulations, standards, and requirements set forth in Article 2 or 3 of this Chapter or applicable State or federal laws and regulations governing the licensure or certification of a facility which results in substantial risk that death or serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation will occur. The person making the findings shall do the following:

        a. Orally and immediately inform the facility of the Type A2 Violation and the specific findings.

        b. Require a written plan of protection regarding how the facility will immediately abate the Type A2 Violation in order to protect clients or residents from further risk or additional harm.

        c. Within 15 working days of the investigation, send a report of the findings to the facility.

      4. Require a plan of correction to be submitted to the Department, based on the written report of the findings, that describes steps the facility will take to achieve and maintain compliance.

        The violation or violations shall be corrected within the time specified for correction by the Department or its authorized representative. The Department may or may not assess a penalty taking into consideration the compliance history, preventative measures, and response to previous violations by the facility. Where a facility has failed to correct a Type A2 Violation, the Department shall assess the facility a civil penalty in the amount of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day that the deficiency continues beyond the time specified for correction by the Department or its authorized representative. The Department or its authorized representative shall determine whether the violation has been corrected.

        (1b) Repealed by Session Laws 2016-50, s. 1, effective June 30, 2016.

    2. “Type B Violation” means a violation by a facility of the regulations, standards, and requirements set forth in Article 2 or 3 of this Chapter or applicable State or federal laws and regulations governing the licensure or certification of a facility which is detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of any client or patient, but which does not result in substantial risk that death or serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation will occur. The person making the findings shall do the following:
      1. Orally and immediately inform the facility of the Type B Violation and the specific findings.
      2. Require a written plan of protection regarding how the facility will immediately abate the Type B Violation in order to protect clients or residents from further risk or additional harm.
      3. Within 15 working days of the investigation, send a report of the findings to the facility.
      4. Require a plan of correction to be submitted to the Department, based on the written report of the findings, that describes steps the facility will take to achieve and maintain compliance.

        Where a facility has failed to correct a Type B Violation within the time specified for correction by the Department or its authorized representative, the Department shall assess the facility a civil penalty in the amount of up to four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each day that the violation continues beyond the date specified for correction without just reason for the failure. The Department or its authorized representative shall ensure that the violation has been corrected.

        (2a) A Type A1, Type A2, or Type B Violation as defined above shall not include a violation by a facility of the regulations, standards, and requirements set forth in Article 2 or 3 of this Chapter or applicable State or federal laws and regulations governing the licensure or certification of a facility if all of the following criteria are met:

        a. The violation was discovered by the facility.

        b. The Department determines that the violation was abated immediately.

        c. The violation was corrected prior to inspection by the Department.

        d. The Department determines that reasonable preventative measures were in place prior to the violation.

      5. The Department determines that subsequent to the violation, the facility implemented corrective measures to achieve and maintain compliance.

        (2b) As used in this section, “substantial risk” shall mean the risk of an outcome that is substantially certain to materialize if immediate action is not taken.

    3. Repeat Violations. —  The Department shall impose a civil penalty which is treble the amount assessed under this subsection when a facility under the same management or ownership has received a citation during the previous 12 months for which the appeal rights are exhausted and penalty payment is expected or has occurred, and the current violation is for the same specific provision of a statute or regulation for which it received a violation during the previous 12 months.
  2. Repealed by Session Laws 2011-249, s. 1, effective June 23, 2011.
  3. Factors to Be Considered in Determining Amount of Initial Penalty. —  In determining the amount of the initial penalty to be imposed under this section, the Department shall consider the following factors:
    1. There is substantial risk that serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation will occur, and this has not been corrected within the time specified by the Department or its authorized representative;
    2. Serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation, without substantial risk for client death, did occur;
    3. Serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation, with substantial risk for client death, did occur; (3a) A client died;

      (3b) A client died and there is substantial risk to others for serious physical harm, abuse, neglect, or exploitation;

      (3c) A client died and there is substantial risk for further client death;

    4. The reasonable diligence exercised by the licensee to comply with G.S. 131E-256 and other applicable State and federal laws and regulations;
    5. Efforts by the licensee to correct violations;
    6. The number and type of previous violations committed by the licensee within the past 36 months; and
    7. Repealed by Session Laws 2011-249, s. 1, effective June 23, 2011.
    8. The number of clients or patients put at risk by the violation.
  4. The facts found to support the factors in subsection (c) of this section shall be the basis in determining the amount of the penalty. The Department shall document the findings in written record and shall make the written record available to all affected parties including:
    1. The licensee involved;
    2. The clients or patients affected; and
    3. The family members or guardians of the clients or patients affected.
  5. The Department shall impose a civil penalty of fifty dollars ($50.00) per day on any facility which refuses to allow an authorized representative of the Department to inspect the premises and records of the facility.
  6. Any facility wishing to contest a penalty shall be entitled to an administrative hearing as provided in Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. A petition for a contested case shall be filed within 30 days after the Department mails a notice of penalty to a licensee. At least the following specific issues shall be addressed at the administrative hearing:
    1. The reasonableness of the amount of any civil penalty assessed, and
    2. The degree to which each factor has been evaluated pursuant to subsection (c) of this section to be considered in determining the amount of an initial penalty.If a civil penalty is found to be unreasonable or if the evaluation of each factor is found to be incomplete, the hearing officer may recommend that the penalty be adjusted accordingly.
  7. Any penalty imposed by the Department of Health and Human Services under this section shall commence on the date of the letter of notification of the penalty amount.
  8. The Secretary may bring a civil action in the superior court of the county wherein the violation occurred to recover the amount of the administrative penalty whenever a facility:
    1. Which has not requested an administrative hearing fails to pay the penalty within 60 days after being notified of the penalty, or
    2. Which has requested an administrative hearing fails to pay the penalty within 60 days after receipt of a written copy of the decision as provided in G.S. 150B-37 .
  9. In lieu of assessing all or some of the administrative penalty, the Secretary may order a facility to provide staff training, or consider the approval of training completed by the facility after the violation, if all of the following criteria are met:
    1. The training is determined by the Department to be specific to the violation.
    2. The training is approved by the Department.
    3. The training is taught by someone approved by the Department.
    4. The facility has corrected the violation and continues to remain in compliance with the regulation.
  10. The clear proceeds of civil penalties provided for in this section shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for deposit in accordance with State law.
  11. In considering renewal of a license, the Department shall not renew a license if outstanding fines and penalties imposed by the Department against the facility or program have not been paid. Fines and penalties for which an appeal is pending are exempt from consideration for nonrenewal under this subsection.

History. 2000-55, s. 4; 2005-276, ss. 10.40A(e), 10.40A(f); 2011-249, s. 1; 2011-398, s. 39; 2016-50, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Subdivision (a)(1c), as enacted by Session Laws 2016-50, s. 1, was redesignated as subdivision (a)(2b) at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, ss. 10.40A(e) and 10.40A(f), effective July 1, 2005, rewrote the second paragraph of subdivision (a)(1); and in subdivision (b)(1), substituted “one thousand dollars ($1,000)” for “five hundred dollars ($500.00)”; and in subdivision (b)(2), substituted “four hundred dollars ($400.00)” for “two hundred dollars ($200.00).”

Session Laws 2011-249, s. 1, effective June 23, 2011, rewrote the section.

Session Laws 2016-50, s. 1, effective June 30, 2016, deleted former subdivision (a)(1b); added subdivisions (a)(1c) and (a)(2a); and rewrote subsection (i). See editor’s note for redesignation of subdivision (a)(1c).

§ 122C-25. Inspections; confidentiality.

  1. The Secretary shall make or cause to be made inspections that the Secretary considers necessary. Facilities licensed under this Article shall be subject to inspection at all times by the Secretary. All residential facilities as defined in G.S. 122C-3(14)e. shall be inspected on an annual basis.
  2. Notwithstanding G.S. 8-53 , G.S. 8-53.3 or any other law relating to confidentiality of communications involving a patient or client, in the course of an inspection conducted under this section, representatives of the Secretary may review any writing or other record concerning the admission, discharge, medication, treatment, medical condition, or history of any individual who is or has been a patient, resident, or client of a licensable facility and the personnel records of those individuals employed by the licensable facility.A licensable facility, its employees, and any other individual interviewed in the course of an inspection are immune from liability for damages resulting from disclosure of any information to the Secretary.Except as required by law, it is unlawful for the Secretary or an employee of the Department to disclose the following information to someone not authorized to receive the information:
    1. Any confidential or privileged information obtained under this section unless the client or his legally responsible person authorizes disclosure in writing; or
    2. The name of anyone who has furnished information concerning a licensable facility without the individual’s consent.Violation of this subsection is a Class 3 misdemeanor punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).All confidential or privileged information obtained under this section and the names of persons providing this information are exempt from Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
  3. The Secretary shall adopt rules regarding inspections, that, at a minimum, provide for:
    1. A general administrative schedule for inspections; and
    2. An unscheduled inspection without notice, if there is a complaint alleging the violation of any licensing rule adopted under this Article.
  4. All residential facilities, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(14)e., shall ensure that the Division of Health Service Regulation complaint hotline number is posted conspicuously in a public place in the facility.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 918; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 2005-276, ss. 10.40A(g), 10.40A(h); 2007-182, s. 1.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, ss. 10.40A(g) and 10.40A(h), effective July 1, 2007, added the second sentence in subsection (a); and added subsection (d). For applicability, see Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-182, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007, substituted “Division of Health Service Regulation” for “Division of Facility Services” in subsection (d).

§ 122C-26. Powers of the Commission.

In addition to other powers and duties, the Commission shall exercise the following powers and duties:

  1. Adopt, amend, and repeal rules consistent with the laws of this State and the laws and regulations of the federal government to implement the provisions and purposes of this Article;
  2. Issue declaratory rulings needed to implement the provisions and purposes of this Article;
  3. Adopt rules governing appeals of decisions to approve or deny licensure under this Article;
  4. Adopt rules for the waiver of rules adopted under this Article; and
  5. Adopt rules applicable to facilities licensed under this Article that do the following:
    1. Establishing personnel requirements of staff employed in facilities.
    2. Establishing qualifications of facility administrators or directors.
    3. Establishing requirements for death reporting including confidentiality provisions related to death reporting.
    4. Establishing requirements for patient advocates.
    5. Requiring facility personnel who refer clients to provider agencies to disclose any pecuniary interest the referring person has in the provider agency, or other interest that may give rise to the appearance of impropriety.
    6. Establishing standardized procedures for facilities in training and record keeping of the measures taken to inform employees and volunteers of the duties imposed by G.S. 122C-66 .
  6. Adopt rules providing for the licensure and accreditation of residential treatment facilities that provide services to persons with traumatic brain injury.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2000-55, s. 5; 2005-276, s. 10.33; 2009-361, s. 1; 2015-36, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2009-490, s. 4, as amended by Session Laws 2012-15, s. 2, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regulation shall establish a pilot program to study the use of electronic supervision devices as an alternative means of supervision during sleep hours at facilities for children and adolescents who have a primary diagnosis of mental illness and/or emotional disturbance. The pilot program shall be implemented at a facility currently authorized to waive the requirement set forth in 10A NCAC 27G.1704(c) or any related or subsequent rule or regulation by the Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services setting minimum overnight staffing requirements. The waiver shall remain in effect until December 31, 2015; however, the Division reserves the right to rescind the waiver if, at the time of the facility’s license renewal, there are outstanding deficiencies that have remained uncorrected upon follow-up survey, that are related to electronic supervision.”

Session Laws 2009-490, s. 5, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall report on the implementation of the pilot program described in Section 4 of this act, including any findings and recommendations to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division not later than April 10, 2010.”

Session Laws 2015-264, s. 91.4(a), provides that: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the pilot program established by the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regulation, to study the use of electronic supervision devices as an alternative means of supervision during sleep hours at facilities for children and adolescents who have a primary diagnosis of mental illness and/or emotional disturbance shall remain in effect and shall extend to facilities that are authorized to provide services in accordance with Section .1700 of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Residential Treatment Staff Secure for Children or Adolescents, currently owned or operated with the facility currently authorized to waive the requirement set forth in 10A NCAC 27G .1704(c) or any related or subsequent rule or regulation by the Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services setting minimum overnight staffing requirements. The waiver for these facilities shall remain in effect; however, the Division reserves the right to rescind the waiver if, at the time of the facility’s license renewal, there are outstanding deficiencies that have remained uncorrected upon follow-up surveys that are related to electronic supervision.” Session Laws 2015-264, s. 91.4(b) which provided that the section expires on June 30, 2016, was repealed by Session Laws 2016-50, s. 3, effective June 30, 2016.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.33, effective July 1, 2005, added subdivision (5)e., and made minor punctuation changes.

Session Laws 2009-361, s. 1, effective July 27, 2009, added subdivision (6).

Session Laws 2015-36, s. 1, effective May 26, 2015, in subdivision (5), made minor stylistic and punctuation changes throughout, and added subdivision (5)f. and made a related change.

§ 122C-27. Powers of the Secretary.

The Secretary shall have the power to do all of the following:

  1. Administer and enforce the provisions, rules, and decisions pursuant to this Article.
  2. Appoint hearing officers to conduct appeals under this Article.
  3. Prescribe by rule the contents of the application for licensure and renewal.
  4. Inspect facilities and records of each facility to be licensed under this Article under the rules and decisions pursuant to this Article.
  5. Issue a license upon a finding that the applicant and facility comply with the provisions of this Article and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary.
  6. Define by rule procedures for submission of periodic reports by facilities licensed under this Article.
  7. Grant, deny, suspend, or revoke a license under this Article.

    (7a) Issue orders directing facilities not licensed under this Article that are providing services requiring a license under this Article to cease and desist from engaging in any act or practice in violation of the provisions of this Article.

  8. In accordance with rules of the Commission, make final agency decisions for appeals from the denial, suspension, or revocation of a license in accordance with G.S. 122C-24 .
  9. In accordance with rules of the Commission, grant waiver for good cause of any rules implementing this Article that do not affect the health, safety, or welfare of individuals within a licensable facility.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2021-77, s. 7.1(c).

Editor’s Note.

Subdivision (7a) was added by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(c) as subdivision (8), but was redesignated as subdivision (7a) at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes. Subdivisions (8) and (9) as amended by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(c) maintained their original designation as directed by the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(d), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(c), effective July 2, 2021, and applicable to cease and desist letters sent by the Department of Health and Human Services on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(c), inserted “have the power to do all of the following” in the introductory paragraph; redesignated former subdivisions (8), and (9) as present subdivisions (9), and (10); added present subdivision (8); and made stylistic changes throughout. For effective date, applicability, and treatment, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-28. Penalties.

Operating a licensable facility without a license is a Class H felony, including a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day that the facility is in operation in violation of this Article.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 919; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 2021-77, s. 7.2(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.2(b), made the rewriting of this section by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.2(a), effective December 1, 2021, and applicable to offenses committed on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.2(a), rewrote the section, which formerly read: “Operating a licensable facility without a license is a Class 3 misdemeanor and is punishable only by a fine not to exceed fifty dollars ($50.00), for the first offense and a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00), for each subsequent offense. Each day’s operation of a licensable facility without a license is a separate offense.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-28.1. Facilities in violation of this Article.

  1. If the Department has directed a facility not licensed under this Article that is providing services requiring a license under this Article to cease and desist from engaging in any act or practice in violation of this Article, then the Department shall conduct a follow-up visit to determine if the Secretary may issue a cease and desist order pursuant to G.S. 122C-27 , unless a cease and desist order has already been issued.
  2. The district attorney’s office with jurisdiction over the facility shall collect information on the total amount of fines collected pursuant to G.S. 122C-28 and report that information to the Department.

History. 2021-77, s. 7.1(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(d), made this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 7.1(a), effective July 2, 2021, and applicable to cease and desist letters sent by the Department of Health and Human Services on or after that date.

§ 122C-29. Injunction.

  1. Notwithstanding the existence or pursuit of any other remedy, the Secretary may, in the way provided by law, maintain an action in the name of the State for injunction or other process against any person to restrain or prevent the establishment, conduct, management, or operation of a licensable facility operating without a license or in a way that threatens the health, safety, or welfare of the individuals in the licensable facility.
  2. If any individual interferes with the proper performance or duty of the Secretary in carrying out this Article, the Secretary may institute an action in the superior court of the county in which the interference occurred for injunctive relief against the continued interference, irrespective of all other remedies at law.

History. 1983, c. 718, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-30. Peer review committee; immunity from liability; confidentiality.

For purposes of peer review functions of a facility licensed under the provisions of this Chapter:

  1. A member of a duly appointed peer review committee or quality assurance committee who acts without malice or fraud shall not be subject to liability for damages in any civil action on account of any act, statement, or proceeding undertaken, made, or performed within the scope of the functions of the committee; and
  2. Proceedings of a peer review or quality assurance committee, the records and materials it produces, and the material it considers shall be confidential and not considered public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 , “Public records’ defined,” and shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action against a facility or a provider of professional health services that results from matters which are the subject of evaluation and review by the committee. No person who was in attendance at a meeting of the committee shall be required to testify in any civil action as to any evidence or other matters produced or presented during the proceedings of the committee or as to any findings, recommendations, evaluations, opinions, or other actions of the committee or its members. However, information, documents or records otherwise available are not immune from discovery or use in a civil action merely because they were presented during proceedings of the committee, and nothing herein shall prevent a provider of professional health services from using such otherwise available information, documents or records in connection with an administrative hearing or civil suit relating to the medical staff membership, clinical privileges or employment of the provider. Documents otherwise available as public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 do not lose their status as public records merely because they were presented or considered during proceedings of the committee. A member of the committee or a person who testifies before the committee may be subpoenaed and be required to testify in a civil action as to events of which the person has knowledge independent of the peer review or quality assurance process, but cannot be asked about the person’s testimony before the committee for impeachment or other purposes or about any opinions formed as a result of the committee hearings.

History. 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1053, s. 2; 2004-149, s. 2.8.

Cross References.

As to provisions pertaining to medical review committees, see G.S. 131E-95 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-149, s. 2.8, effective August 2, 2004, substituted “facility” for “hospital” in the first sentence; inserted “or quality assurance committee” in subdivision (1); in subdivision (2), inserted “or quality assurance” in the first sentence, inserted the fourth sentence, and in the last sentence, inserted “or quality assurance” preceding “process,” and substituted gender neutral language.

§ 122C-31. Report required upon death of client.

  1. A facility shall notify the Secretary immediately upon the death of any client of the facility that occurs within seven days of physical restraint or seclusion of the client, and shall notify the Secretary within three days of the death of any client of the facility resulting from violence, accident, suicide, or homicide. The Secretary may assess a civil penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) and not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) against a facility that fails to notify the Secretary of a death and the circumstances surrounding the death known to the facility. Chapter 150B of the General Statutes governs the assessment of a penalty under this section. A civil penalty owed under this section may be recovered in a civil action brought by the Secretary or the Attorney General. The clear proceeds of the penalty shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for deposit in accordance with State law.
  2. Upon receipt of notification from a facility in accordance with subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall notify the State protection and advocacy agency designated under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 15001, et seq., that a person with a disability has died. The Secretary shall provide the agency access to the information about each death reported pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, including information resulting from any investigation of the death by the Department and from reports received from the Chief Medical Examiner pursuant to G.S. 130A-385 . The agency shall use the information in accordance with its powers and duties under applicable State and federal law and regulations.
  3. If the death of a client of a facility occurs within seven days of the use of physical restraint or seclusion, then the Secretary shall initiate immediately an investigation of the death.
  4. An inpatient psychiatric unit of a hospital licensed under Chapter 131E of the General Statutes shall comply with this section.
  5. Nothing in this section abrogates State or federal law or requirements pertaining to the confidentiality, privilege, or other prohibition against disclosure of information provided to the Secretary or the agency. In carrying out the requirements of this section, the Secretary and the agency shall adhere to State and federal requirements of confidentiality, privilege, and other prohibitions against disclosure and release applicable to the information received under this section. A facility or provider that makes available confidential information in accordance with this section and with State and federal law is not liable for the release of the information.
  6. The Secretary shall establish a standard reporting format for reporting deaths pursuant to this section and shall provide to facilities subject to this section a form for the facility’s use in complying with this section.
  7. In addition to the reporting requirements specified in subsections (a) through (e) of this section, and pursuant to G.S. 130A-383 , every State facility shall report, without redactions other than to protect confidential personnel information, the death of any client of the facility, and, if known, the death of any former client of a facility who dies within 14 days of release from the facility, regardless of the manner of death:
    1. To the medical examiner of the county in which the body of the deceased is found; and
    2. To the State protection and advocacy agency designated under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 15001, et seq. The State protection and advocacy agency shall use the information in accordance with its powers and duties under applicable State or federal law and regulations.
  8. Notwithstanding G.S. 122C-52 , and unless otherwise prohibited by State or federal law or requirements, in order to provide for greater transparency in connection with the reporting requirements specified in subsections (a) through (g) of this section, the following information in reports made pursuant to this section shall be public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 when reported by a State facility:
    1. The name, sex, age, and date of birth of the deceased.
    2. The name of the facility providing the report.
    3. The date, time, and location of the death.
    4. A brief description of the circumstances of death, including the manner of death, if known.
    5. A list of all entities to whom the event was reported.
  9. Notwithstanding G.S. 122C-22 , all facilities, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(14), shall comply with this section.

History. 2000-129, s. 3(a); 2007-323, ss. 19.1(e), (f); 2008-131, s. 1; 2009-299, ss. 1-4.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 19.1(e), (f), substituted “the agency” for “the Council” throughout subsections (b) and (e); in subsection (b), substituted “State protection and advocacy agency designated under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 2000, P.L. 106-402” for “Governor’s Advocacy Council for Persons with Disabilities” in the first sentence, and substituted “duties under applicable State and federal law” for “duties under G.S. 143B-403.1 and applicable federal law” in the last sentence. For effective date, see Editor’s note.

Session Laws 2008-131, s. 1, effective July 28, 2008, added subsection (g).

Session Laws 2009-299, ss. 1 to 4, effective July 17, 2009, in subsection (b), substituted “42 U.S.C. § 15001, et seq.” for “P.L. 106-402”; rewrote subsection (g); and added subsections (h) and (i).

§ 122C-32. Patient visitation rights for residents of residential treatment facilities.

  1. Any facility licensed under this Chapter shall allow clients to receive visitors of their choice to the fullest extent permitted under the infection and prevention control program of the facility and applicable guidelines or orders issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department, local health departments, or any other government public health agency.
  2. In the event the Department finds a facility has violated any rule, regulation, guidance, directive, or law relating to a client’s visitation rights, the Department may issue a warning to the facility about the violation and give the facility not more than 24 hours to allow visitation. If visitation is not allowed after the 24-hour warning period, the Department shall impose a civil penalty in an amount not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each instance on each day the facility was found to have a violation. This civil penalty shall be in addition to any licensure action, fine, or civil penalty that the Department may impose pursuant to this Chapter.
  3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, in the event that circumstances require the complete closure of a facility to visitors, the facility shall use its best efforts to develop alternate visitation protocols that would allow visitation to the greatest extent safely possible. If those alternate protocols are found by the Department, the local health departments, or any other government public health agency to violate any rule, regulation, guidance, or federal law relating to a client’s visitation rights, the Department may impose a civil penalty in an amount not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each instance on each day the facility was found to have a violation. This civil penalty shall be in addition to any fine or civil penalty that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or other federal agency may choose to impose and any licensure action, fine, or civil penalty that the Department may impose pursuant to this Chapter.
  4. Each facility shall provide notice of the client visitation rights in this act to clients and, when possible, family members of clients. The required notice shall also include the contact information for the agency or individuals tasked with investigating violations of facility client visitation.
  5. Subject to, and to the fullest extent permitted by, any rules, regulations, or guidelines adopted by either the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or any federal law, each facility shall allow compassionate care visits. The facility may require compassionate care visitors to submit to health screenings necessary to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section, the facility may restrict a compassionate care visitor who does not pass a health screening requirement or who has tested positive for an infectious disease. The facility may require compassionate care visitors to adhere to infection control procedures, including wearing personal protective equipment. Compassionate care situations that require visits include, but are not limited to, the following:
    1. End-of-life situations.
    2. A resident who was living with his or her family before recently being admitted to the facility is struggling with the change in environment and lack of physical family support.
    3. A resident who is grieving after a friend or family member recently passed away.
    4. A resident who needs cueing and encouragement with eating or drinking, previously provided by family or caregivers, is experiencing weight loss or dehydration.
    5. A resident, who used to talk and interact with others, is experiencing emotional distress, seldom speaking, or crying more frequently when the resident had rarely cried in the past.

History. 2021-171, s. 6; 2021-181, s. 2(f).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-171 provides in its preamble: “Whereas, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused great uncertainty and anxiety across our State and has significantly affected patients and residents in health care facilities; and

“Whereas, health care facilities have made many efforts to keep patients and employees in a safe environment and have endeavored to minimize, to the extent possible, the risk of spread of the coronavirus disease; and

“Whereas, as a result of COVID-19 prevention measures, many unintended consequences have occurred to patients and residents of these facilities who were not diagnosed with COVID-19; and

“Whereas, the General Assembly has become aware of numerous patients and residents of health care facilities across our State who were not diagnosed with COVID-19, but as a result of visitation policies have been prohibited from having any visitors, including a spouse, parent, close family member, guardian, health care agent, or caregiver; and

“Whereas, many families have been unable to be physically present with their loved ones while in a hospital, nursing home, combination home, hospice care, adult care home, special care unit, or residential treatment setting for mental illness, developmental or intellectual disability, or substance use disorder, and have been limited to electronic video communications, if any, with the patient; and

“Whereas, the patients and residents who have been affected in the above_described manner have included adults, minors, and individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities; and

“Whereas, the General Assembly finds that it is in the interest of the State and its residents that these patients and residents of health care facilities, in compliance with the rules, regulations, and guidelines of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and federal law, should not be denied visitation by visitors of their choosing throughout the period of hospitalization or residential treatment; Now, therefore,”

Session Laws 2021-171, s. 1, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The No Patient Left Alone Act.’”

Session Laws 2021-171, s. 7, made this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-171, s. 6, effective November 1, 2021.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-181, s. 2(f), effective November 1, 2021, in the first sentence of subsection (e), added “Subject to, and to the fullest extent…Prevention or any federal law” at the beginning, and made a related change.

§§ 122C-33 through 122C-50.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 3. Clients’ Rights and Advance Instruction.

Part 1. Client’s Rights.

§ 122C-51. Declaration of policy on clients’ rights.

It is the policy of the State to assure basic human rights to each client of a facility. These rights include the right to dignity, privacy, humane care, and freedom from mental and physical abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Each facility shall assure to each client the right to live as normally as possible while receiving care and treatment.

It is further the policy of this State that each client who is admitted to and is receiving services from a facility has the right to treatment, including access to medical care and habilitation, regardless of age or degree of mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse. Each client has the right to an individualized written treatment or habilitation plan setting forth a program to maximize the development or restoration of his capabilities.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 1, 8; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 7; 1997-442, s. 1.

Cross References.

As to penalties for violations of this Article, see G.S. 122C-24.1 .

Legal Periodicals.

For note discussing the application of the constitutional right of privacy to a mental patient’s refusal of psychotropic medication, see 57 N.C.L. Rev. 1481 (1979).

For comment on exclusionary zoning of community facilities, see 12 N.C. Cent. L.J. 167 (1980).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

The provisions of former G.S. 122-55.1 through 122-55.14, relating to patients’ rights, applied to services provided for an area mental health authority (now area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authority) by a general hospital, etc., on a contractual basis. See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. R.J. Bickel, Deputy Director for Administration, Division of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Services, 48 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 9 (1978).

See opinion of Attorney General to Dr. Lenore Behar, Chief, Children and Youth Services, Division of Mental Health Services, 44 N.C.A.G. 3 (1974), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-52. Right to confidentiality.

  1. Except as provided in G.S. 132-5 and G.S. 122C-31(h) , confidential information acquired in attending or treating a client is not a public record under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
  2. Except as authorized by G.S. 122C-53 through G.S. 122C-56 , no individual having access to confidential information may disclose this information, provided, however, a HIPAA covered entity or business associate receiving confidential information that has been disclosed pursuant to G.S. 122C-53 through G.S. 122C-56 may use and disclose such information as permitted or required under 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 164, Subpart E.
  3. Except as provided by G.S. 122C-53 through G.S. 122C-56 , each client has the right that no confidential information acquired be disclosed by the facility.
  4. No provision of G.S. 122C-205 and G.S. 122C-53 through G.S. 122C-56 permitting disclosure of confidential information may apply to the records of a client when federal statutes or regulations applicable to that client prohibit the disclosure of this information.
  5. Except as required or permitted by law, disclosure of confidential information to someone not authorized to receive the information is a Class 3 misdemeanor and is punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).

History. 1955, c. 887, s. 12; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1965, c. 800, s. 4; 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 5; c. 1408, s. 2; 1979, c. 147; 1983, c. 383, s. 10; c. 491; c. 638, s. 22; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 11; 1987, c. 749, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 920; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 2009-299, s. 5; 2011-314, s. 2(a).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-299, s. 5, effective July 17, 2009, inserted “and G.S. 122C-31(h) ” in subsection (a).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 law on evidence, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1456 (1980).

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

CASE NOTES

Applicability. —

Workers’ compensation claimant had no statutory right to bar the public disclosure of his workers’ compensation file because (1) the disclosure of documents that were not awards was statutorily prevented, (2) the general assembly did not exempt awards, (3) the physician-patient privilege was irrelevant, (4) the prohibition against disclosing mental health records did not apply, and (5) the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act did not apply to the Industrial Commission (Commission) and let physicians disclose health information to the Commission. Mastanduno v. Nat'l Freight Indus., 262 N.C. App. 77, 821 S.E.2d 592, 2018 N.C. App. LEXIS 1024 (2018), writ denied, 371 N.C. 785 , 819 S.E.2d 559, 2018 N.C. LEXIS 982 (2018), cert. denied, 372 N.C. 52 , 822 S.E.2d 636, 2019 N.C. LEXIS 109 (2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 269, 205 L. Ed. 2d 133, 2019 U.S. LEXIS 5952 (2019).

Mental Health Records Previously Admitted Into Evidence In Parental Rights Termination Case. —

Trial court did not err by considering mental health records of a mother contained within the underlying file and previously admitted into evidence in proceedings to terminate her parental rights, because the mental health records challenged by the mother were originally admitted into evidence during a permanency planning review hearing and were not challenged by the mother at that time. In re J.B., 172 N.C. App. 1, 616 S.E.2d 264, 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1589 (2005).

Mental Health Records Admissible. —

Rutherford County Department of Social Services was not precluded from admitting the mother’s mental health records into evidence. In re J.S.L., 177 N.C. App. 151, 628 S.E.2d 387, 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 883 (2006).

Disclosure of the decedent’s substance abuse treatment information, pursuant to a trial judge’s order in a medical malpractice action where the decedent’s mental health and history of substance abuse were placed at issue by the decedent and later the decedent’s executor, was authorized by the exception codified in G.S. 122C-54 because the disclosure of the information was not prohibited by 42 C.F.R. §§ 2.63(a)(3) and 2.64(d). Spangler v. Olchowski, 187 N.C. App. 684, 654 S.E.2d 507, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 2575 (2007).

§ 122C-53. Exceptions; client.

  1. A facility may disclose confidential information if the client or the legally responsible person consents in writing to the release of the information to a specified person. This release is valid for a specified length of time and is subject to revocation by the consenting individual.
  2. A facility may disclose (i) the fact of admission or discharge of a client and (ii) the time and location of admission or discharge to the client’s next of kin whenever the responsible professional determines that the disclosure is in the best interest of the client.
  3. Upon request a client shall have access to confidential information in the client’s record except information that would be injurious to the client’s physical or mental well-being as determined by the attending physician or, if there is none, by the facility director or the facility director’s designee. If the attending physician or, if there is none, the facility director or the facility director’s designee has refused to provide confidential information to a client, the client may request that the information be sent to a physician or psychologist of the client’s choice, and in this event the information shall be so provided.
  4. Except as provided by G.S. 90-21.4(b) , upon request the legally responsible person of a client shall have access to confidential information in the client’s record; except information that would be injurious to the client’s physical or mental well-being as determined by the attending physician or, if there is none, by the facility director or the facility director’s designee. If the attending physician or, if there is none, the facility director or the facility director’s designee has refused to provide confidential information to the legally responsible person, the legally responsible person may request that the information be sent to a physician or psychologist of the legally responsible person’s choice, and in this event the information shall be so provided.
  5. A client advocate’s access to confidential information and the client’s responsibility for safeguarding this information are as provided by subsection (g) of this section.
  6. As used in subsection (g) of this section, the following terms have the meanings specified:
    1. “Internal client advocate” means a client advocate who is employed by the facility or has a written contractual agreement with the Department or with the facility to provide monitoring and advocacy services to clients in the facility in which the client is receiving services.
    2. “External client advocate” means a client advocate acting on behalf of a particular client with the written consent and authorization under either of the following circumstances:
      1. In the case of a client who is an adult and who has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes, of the client.
      2. In the case of any other client, of the client and the legally responsible person.
  7. An internal client advocate shall be granted, without the consent of the client or the legally responsible person, access to routine reports and other confidential information necessary to fulfill monitoring and advocacy functions. In this role, the internal client advocate may disclose confidential information received to the client involved, to the legally responsible person, to the director of the facility or the director’s designee, to other individuals within the facility who are involved in the treatment or habilitation of the client, or to the Secretary in accordance with the rules of the Commission. Any further disclosure shall require the written consent of the client and the legally responsible person. An external client advocate shall have access to confidential information only upon the written consent of the client and his legally responsible person. In this role, the external client advocate may use the information only as authorized by the client and his legally responsible person.
  8. In accordance with G.S. 122C-205 , the facility shall notify the appropriate individuals upon the escape from and subsequent return of clients to a 24-hour facility.
  9. Upon the request of (i) a client who is an adult and who has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes, or (ii) the legally responsible person for any other client, a facility shall disclose to an attorney confidential information relating to that client.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 2-5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 26(d); 1995, c. 507, s. 23.4; 2018-33, s. 3.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 3, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 3, substituted “the facility director’s designee” for “his designee” throughout; in subsection (b), added the item (i) designator, and added item (ii); in subdivision (f)(2), added “under either of the following circumstances” in the introductory paragraph; and made minor grammatical, gender neutral, and punctuation changes throughout. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

One of the cases annotated below was decided under former statutory provisions.

Prisoners receiving mental health care were not covered by former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62); the statutes applied only to mental health patients who were not imprisoned with the Department of Correction. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

With respect to the rights of prisoners receiving care in facilities operated by the Department of Human Resources, G.S. 143B-261.1 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto apply, rather than former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62), as they do to those prisoners who remained in prison for their mental health care. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

There is no absolute prohibition against disclosing information from a former patient’s records to the former patient. Such a request should be acted upon according to the circumstances of the case. See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. R. Patterson Webb, Assistant Commissioner for Administration, N.C. Department of Mental Health, 42 N.C.A.G. 291 (1973), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-54. Exceptions; abuse reports and court proceedings.

  1. A facility shall disclose confidential information if a court of competent jurisdiction issues an order compelling disclosure.

    (a1) Upon a determination by the facility director or the facility director’s designee that disclosure is in the best interests of the client, a facility may disclose confidential information for purposes of filing a petition for involuntary commitment of a client pursuant to Article 5 of this Chapter or for purposes of filing a petition for the adjudication of incompetency of the client and the appointment of a guardian or an interim guardian under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes.

  2. If an individual is a defendant in a criminal case and a mental examination of the defendant has been ordered by the court as provided in G.S. 15A-1002 , the facility shall send the results or the report of the mental examination to the clerk of court, to the district attorney or prosecuting officer, and to the attorney of record for the defendant as provided in G.S. 15A-1002 (d). The report shall contain a treatment recommendation, if any, and an opinion as to whether there is a likelihood that the defendant will gain the capacity to proceed.
  3. When an individual is held at a facility under involuntary commitment or voluntary admission proceedings that require district court hearings or rehearings pursuant to Article 5 of this Chapter, certified copies of written results of examinations, gathered during the course of the current commitment or admission, shall be furnished by the facility to the client’s counsel, the attorney representing the State’s interest, and the court. Upon request, the facility shall disclose to respondent’s counsel, the attorney representing the State’s interest, and the court confidential information collected, maintained, or used in attending or treating the respondent during the proceeding for voluntary admission or involuntary commitment. Other medical records shall be furnished only upon court order. The confidentiality of client information shall be preserved in all matters except those pertaining to the necessity for admission or continued stay in the facility or commitment under review.
  4. Any individual seeking confidential information contained in the court files or the court records of a proceeding made pursuant to Article 5 of this Chapter may file a written motion in the cause setting out why the information is needed. A district court judge may issue an order to disclose the confidential information sought if he finds the order is appropriate under the circumstances and if he finds that it is in the best interest of the individual admitted or committed or of the public to have the information disclosed. (d1) Repealed by Session Laws 2015-195, s. 11(a), effective January 1, 2016.

    (d2) The record of involuntary commitment for inpatient or outpatient mental health treatment or for substance abuse treatment required to be reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) by G.S. 14-409.43 shall be accessible only by the sheriff or the sheriff’s designee for the purposes of conducting background checks under G.S. 14-404 and shall remain otherwise confidential as provided by this Article.

  5. Upon the request of the legally responsible person or the minor admitted or committed, and after that minor has both been released and reached adulthood, the court records of that minor made in proceedings pursuant to Article 5 of this Chapter may be expunged from the files of the court. The minor and the minor’s legally responsible person shall be informed in writing by the court of the right provided by this subsection at the time that the application for admission is filed with the court.
  6. A State facility and the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill may disclose confidential information to staff attorneys of the Attorney General’s office whenever the information is necessary to the performance of the statutory responsibilities of the Attorney General’s office or to its performance when acting as attorney for a State facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.
  7. A facility may disclose confidential information to an attorney who represents either the facility or an employee of the facility, if such information is relevant to litigation, to the operations of the facility, or to the provision of services by the facility. An employee may discuss confidential information with the employee’s attorney or with an attorney representing the facility in which the employee is employed.
  8. A facility shall disclose confidential information for purposes of complying with Article 3 of Chapter 7B of the General Statutes and Article 6 of Chapter 108A of the General Statutes, or as required by other State or federal law.
  9. G.S. 132-1.4 shall apply to the records of criminal investigations conducted by any law enforcement unit of a State facility, and information described in G.S. 132-1.4(c) that is collected by the State facility law enforcement unit shall be public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 .
  10. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the Secretary may inform any person of any incident or event involving the welfare of a client or former client when the Secretary determines that the release of the information is essential to maintaining the integrity of the Department. However, the release shall not include information that identifies the client directly, or information for which disclosure is prohibited by State or federal law or requirements, or information for which, in the Secretary’s judgment, by reference to publicly known or available information, there is a reasonable basis to believe the client will be identified.

History. 1955, c. 887, s. 12; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 5; c. 1408, s. 2; 1977, c. 696, s. 1; 1979, c. 147; c. 915, s. 20; 1983, c. 383, s. 10; c. 491; c. 638, s. 22; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 638, ss. 1, 3.1; 1989, c. 141, s. 9; 1993, c. 516, s. 12; 1998-202, s. 13(dd); 2003-313, s. 2; 2008-210, s. 1; 2009-299, s. 6; 2013-18, s. 7; 2013-369, ss. 7, 8; 2015-195, s. 11(a), (e); 2018-33, s. 4.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1993, c. 516, s. 13 provides that nothing in the act obligates the General Assembly to make any appropriations to implement it.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 4, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2008-210, s. 1, effective December 1, 2008, added subsection (d1).

Session Laws 2009-299, s. 6, effective July 17, 2009, added subsections (i) and (j).

Session Laws 2015-195, s. 11(a), (e), effective January 1, 2016, repealed subsection (d1); and rewrote subsection (d2).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 4, substituted “the facility director’s designee” for “his designee” in subsection (a1); rewrote subsection (c); substituted “the minor’s legally” for “his legally” in the second sentence of subsection (e); and, in the last sentence of subsection (g), substituted “the employee’s attorney” for “his attorney” and “the employee is” for “he is.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

CASE NOTES

Mental Health Records Previously Admitted Into Evidence In Parental Rights Termination Case. —

Trial court did not err by considering mental health records of a mother contained within the underlying file and previously admitted into evidence in proceedings to terminate her parental rights, because the mental health records challenged by the mother were originally admitted into evidence during a permanency planning review hearing and were not challenged by the mother at that time. In re J.B., 172 N.C. App. 1, 616 S.E.2d 264, 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1589 (2005).

Disclosure of Information Authorized. —

Disclosure of the decedent’s substance abuse treatment information, pursuant to a trial judge’s order in a medical malpractice action where the decedent’s mental health and history of substance abuse were placed at issue by the decedent and later BY the decedent’s executor, was authorized by the exception codified in G.S. 122C-54 as the disclosure of the information was not prohibited by 42 C.F.R. §§ 2.63(a)(3) and 2.64(d). Spangler v. Olchowski, 187 N.C. App. 684, 654 S.E.2d 507, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 2575 (2007).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Information may be submitted to Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services). See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. R. Patterson Webb, Assistant Commissioner for Administration, N.C. Department of Mental Health, 42 N.C.A.G. 206 (1973), rendered under former statutory provisions.

When ordered by the clerk of superior court, an agent or employee of a State mental institution must disclose information from a patient’s record in proceedings to determine whether such patient should be hospitalized. See opinion of Attorney General to Pedro Carreras, M.D., John Umstead Hospital, 41 N.C.A.G. 666 (1971), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-54.1.

Recodified as G.S. 14-409.42 by Session Laws 2015-195, s. 11(b), effective August 5, 2015.

Editor’s Note.

This section was enacted as G.S. 122C-54.1 and was recodified as G.S. 14-409.42 by Session Laws 2015-195, s. 11(b), effective August 5, 2015.

§ 122C-55. Exceptions; care and treatment. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. Any facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with any other facility when necessary to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
    1. “Client” includes an enrollee as defined in G.S. 108D-1 . (1a) Coordinate. — The provision, coordination, or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and other health or related services by one or more facilities and includes the referral of a client from one facility to another.
    2. Facility or area facility. — Include[s] an area authority or a prepaid health plan.
    3. Secretary. — Includes any primary care case management programs that contract with the Department to provide a primary care case management program for recipients of publicly funded health and related services.

      (a1) Any facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the Secretary, and the Secretary may share confidential information regarding any client with a facility when necessary to conduct quality assessment and improvement activities or to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client. For purposes of this subsection, subsection (a6), and subsection (a7) of this section, the purposes or activities for which confidential information may be disclosed include, but are not limited to, case management and care coordination, disease management, outcomes evaluation, the development of clinical guidelines and protocols, the development of care management plans and systems, population-based activities relating to improving or reducing health care costs, and the provision, coordination, or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and other health or related services.

      (a2) Any facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with any other area facility or State facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill when necessary to conduct payment activities relating to an individual served by the facility. Payment activities are activities undertaken by a facility to obtain payment or receive reimbursement for the provision of services and may include, but are not limited to, determinations of eligibility or coverage, coordination of benefits, determinations of cost-sharing amounts, claims management, claims processing, claims adjudication, claims appeals, billing and collection activities, medical necessity reviews, utilization management and review, precertification and preauthorization of services, concurrent and retrospective review of services, and appeals related to utilization management and review.

      (a3) Whenever there is reason to believe that a client is eligible for benefits through a Department program, any facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the Secretary, and the Secretary may share confidential information regarding any client with an area facility or State facility or the psychiatric services of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill. Disclosure is limited to that information necessary to establish initial eligibility for benefits, determine continued eligibility over time, and obtain reimbursement for the costs of services provided to the client.

      (a4) An area authority or prepaid health plan may share confidential information regarding any client with any area facility, and any area facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the area authority or prepaid health plan, when the area authority or prepaid health plan determines the disclosure is necessary to develop, manage, monitor, or evaluate the area authority’s or prepaid health plan’s network of qualified providers as provided in G.S. 122C-115.2(b)(1)b., G.S. 122C-141(a), Article 3 of Chapter 108D of the General Statutes, the State Plan, rules of the Secretary, and contracts between the facility and the Department. For the purposes of this subsection, the purposes or activities for which confidential information may be disclosed include, but are not limited to, quality assessment and improvement activities, provider accreditation and staff credentialing, developing contracts and negotiating rates, investigating and responding to client grievances and complaints, evaluating practitioner and provider performance, auditing functions, on-site monitoring, conducting consumer satisfaction studies, and collecting and analyzing performance data.

      (a5) Any area facility may share confidential information with any other area facility regarding an applicant when necessary to determine whether the applicant is eligible for area facility services. For the purpose of this subsection, the term “applicant” means an individual who contacts an area facility for services.

      (a6) When necessary to conduct quality assessment and improvement activities or to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client, the Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management program, may disclose confidential information acquired pursuant to subsection (a1) of this section to a health care provider or other entity that has entered into a written agreement with the Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management program, to participate in the care management support network and systems developed and maintained by the primary care case manager for the purpose of coordinating and improving the quality of care for recipients of publicly funded health and related services. Health care providers and other entities receiving confidential information that has been disclosed pursuant to this subsection may use and disclose the information as permitted or required under 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 164, Subpart E.

      (a7) A facility may share confidential information with one or more HIPAA covered entities or business associates for the same purposes set forth in subsection (a1) of this section. Before making disclosures under this subsection, the facility shall inform the client or the client’s legally responsible person that the facility may make the disclosures unless the client or the client’s legally responsible person objects in writing or signs a non-disclosure form that shall be supplied by the facility. If the client or the client’s legally responsible person objects in writing or signs a non-disclosure form, the disclosures otherwise permitted by this subsection are prohibited. A covered entity or business associate receiving confidential information that has been disclosed by a facility pursuant to this subsection may use and disclose the information as permitted or required under 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 164, Subpart E. This confidential information, however, shall not be used or disclosed for discriminatory purposes including, without limitation, employment discrimination, medical insurance coverage or rate discrimination, or discrimination by law enforcement officers.

  2. A facility, physician, or other individual responsible for evaluation, management, supervision, or treatment of respondents examined or committed for outpatient treatment under the provisions of Article 5 of this Chapter may request, receive, and disclose confidential information to the extent necessary to fulfill the facility’s, physician’s, or individual’s responsibilities.
  3. A facility may furnish confidential information in its possession to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety when requested by that department regarding any client of that facility when the inmate has been determined by the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety to be in need of treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse. The Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety may furnish to a facility confidential information in its possession about treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse that the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety has provided to any present or former inmate if the inmate is presently seeking treatment from the requesting facility or if the inmate has been involuntarily committed to the requesting facility for inpatient or outpatient treatment. Under the circumstances described in this subsection, the consent of the client or inmate is not required in order for this information to be furnished, and the information shall be furnished despite objection by the client or inmate. Confidential information disclosed pursuant to this subsection is restricted from further disclosure.

    (c1) (See editor’s note for effective date information) A facility may furnish confidential information in its possession to the sheriff of any county when requested by the sheriff regarding any client of that facility who is confined in the county’s jail or jail annex when the inmate has been determined by the county jail medical unit to be in need of treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse. The sheriff may furnish to a facility confidential information in its possession about treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse that the county jail medical unit has provided to any present or former inmate if the inmate is presently seeking treatment from the requesting facility or if the inmate has been involuntarily committed to the requesting facility for inpatient or outpatient treatment. Under the circumstances described in this subsection, the consent of the client or inmate is not required in order for this information to be furnished, and the information shall be furnished despite objection by the client or inmate. Confidential information disclosed pursuant to this subsection is restricted from further disclosure.

  4. A responsible professional may disclose confidential information when in the responsible professional’s opinion there is an imminent danger to the health or safety of the client or another individual or there is a likelihood of the commission of a felony or violent misdemeanor.
  5. A responsible professional may exchange confidential information with a physician or other health care provider that is providing emergency medical services to a client. Disclosure of the information is limited to that necessary to meet the emergency as determined by the responsible professional.

    (e1) A State facility may furnish client identifying information to the Department for the purpose of maintaining an index of clients served in State facilities that may be used by State facilities only if that information is necessary for the appropriate and effective evaluation, care, and treatment of the client.

    (e2) A responsible professional may disclose an advance instruction for mental health treatment or confidential information from an advance instruction to a physician, psychologist, or other qualified professional when the responsible professional determines that disclosure is necessary to give effect to or provide treatment in accordance with the advance instruction.

  6. A facility may disclose confidential information to a provider of support services whenever the facility has entered into a written agreement with a person to provide support services and the agreement includes a provision in which the provider of support services acknowledges that in receiving, storing, processing, or otherwise dealing with any confidential information, the provider of support services will safeguard and not further disclose the information.
  7. Whenever there is reason to believe that the client is eligible for financial benefits through a governmental agency, a facility may disclose confidential information to State, local, or federal government agencies. Except as provided in subsections (a3) and (g1) of this section, disclosure is limited to that confidential information necessary to establish financial benefits for a client. Except as provided in subsection (g1) of this section, after establishment of these benefits, the consent of the client or the client’s legally responsible person is required for further release of confidential information under this subsection. (g1) A State facility operated under the authority of G.S. 122C-181 may disclose confidential information for the purpose of collecting payment due the facility for the cost of care, treatment, or habilitation.

    (g2) Whenever there is reason to believe that the client is eligible for educational services through a governmental agency, a facility shall disclose client identifying information to the Department of Public Instruction. Disclosure is limited to that information necessary to establish, coordinate, or maintain educational services. The Department of Public Instruction may further disclose client identifying information to a local school administrative unit as necessary.

  8. Within a facility, employees, students, consultants, or volunteers involved in the care, treatment, or habilitation of a client may exchange confidential information as needed for the purpose of carrying out their responsibility in serving the client.
  9. Upon specific request, a responsible professional may release confidential information to a physician or psychologist who referred the client to the facility.
  10. Upon request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client or the client’s legally responsible person, the responsible professional shall provide the next of kin or other family member or the designee with notification of the client’s diagnosis, the prognosis, the medications prescribed, the dosage of the medications prescribed, the side effects of the medications prescribed, if any, and the progress of the client, if the client or the client’s legally responsible person has consented in writing, or the client has consented orally in the presence of a witness selected by the client, prior to the release of this information. Both the client’s or the legally responsible person’s consent and the release of this information shall be documented in the client’s medical record. This consent shall be valid for a specified length of time only and is subject to revocation by the consenting individual.
  11. Notwithstanding G.S. 122C-53(b) or G.S. 122C-206 , upon request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client or the client’s legally responsible person, the responsible professional shall provide the next of kin, the family member, or the designee, notification of the client’s admission to the facility, transfer to another facility, decision to leave the facility against medical advice, discharge from the facility, and referrals and appointment information for treatment after discharge, after notification to the client that this information has been requested.
  12. In response to a written request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client, for additional information not provided for in subsections (j) and (k) of this section, and when the written request identifies the intended use for this information, the responsible professional shall, in a timely manner, do one or more of the following:
    1. Provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that providing this information will be to the client’s therapeutic benefit, if the client or the client’s legally responsible person has consented in writing to the release of the information requested.
    2. Refuse to provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that providing this information will be detrimental to the therapeutic relationship between client and professional.
    3. Refuse to provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that the next of kin or family member or designee does not have a legitimate need for the information requested.
  13. The Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services shall adopt rules specifically to define the legitimate role referred to in subsections (j), (k), and (l) of this section.

History. 1955, c. 887, s. 12; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 5; c. 1408, s. 2; 1979, c. 147; 1983, c. 383, s. 10; c. 491; c. 638, s. 22; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 15; 1987, c. 638, ss. 2, 3; 1989, c. 141, s. 10; c. 438; c. 625, s. 8; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 27; 1991, c. 359, s. 1; c. 544, s. 1; 1998-198, s. 4; 2003-313, s. 3; 2009-65, s. 1(a), (b); 2009-487, s. 5; 2009-570, s. 43; 2011-102, ss. 3, 4; 2011-145, ss. 10.14, 19.1(h); 2011-314, s. 2(b); 2011-391, s. 23; 2014-100, s. 8.39(d); 2017-186, s. 2(kkkkk); 2018-33, s. 5; 2019-81, s. 9A; 2019-177, s. 6.1(a), (b); 2019-240, s. 26(c).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 10.14, effective July 1, 2011, would have amended subsection (g) and added subsection (g1), but was repealed by Session Laws 2011-391, s. 23, effective July 1, 2011.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2011.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, the bracketed text has been inserted in subdivision (a)(2).

This section was amended by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 5, effective October 1, 2019, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . The word “or” was not struck through preceding “State” in the first sentence of subsection (a2) and following “State” in subsection (a3). The language at the beginning of the October 1, 2019, version of subsection (a2) should probably read “Any State facility” and the language in the October 1, 2019, version of subsection (a3) should probably read “any State facility.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, as amended by Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(b), provides: “ G.S. 122C-55(c1), as enacted by Section 5 of this act, and Sections 44, 45(a), and 45(b) of this act are effective when the act becomes law. The remainder of this act becomes effective October 1, 2019, and applies to proceedings initiated on or after that date.”

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(c), provides, in part: “Subsection (b) of this section becomes retroactively effective June 22, 2018. Nothing in subsection (b) of this section imposes liability on a facility or sheriff for failing to furnish confidential information before the date this act becomes law.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-65, s. 1(a) and (b), effective June 8, 2009, rewrote subsection (a1) and added subsection (a6).

Session Laws 2009-487, s. 5, effective August 26, 2009, inserted “ ‘facility’ includes an LME and” in the last sentence of subsection (a1).

Session Laws 2009-570, s. 43, effective August 28, 2009, substituted “the Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program” for “a Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program” in the last sentence of subsection (a6).

Session Laws 2011-102, ss. 3, 4, effective June 2, 2011, in subsection (g), substituted “subsections (a3) and (g1) of this section” for “G.S. 122C-55(a3)” in the second sentence, and added “Except as provided in subsection (g1) of this section” at the beginning of the last sentence.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(d), effective July 1, 2014, added subsection (g2).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(kkkkk), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout subsection (c).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 5, rewrote subsection (a); in subsection (a1), deleted the former last sentence, which read: “As used in this section, ‘facility’ includes an LME and ‘Secretary’ includes the Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management programs that contract with the Department to provide a primary care case management program for recipients of publicly funded health and related services.”; in subsection (a2), in the first sentence, deleted “area” following “Any” and, in the second sentence, substituted “payment or receive reimbursement” for “or provide reimbursement”; in subsection (a3), deleted “area” following “State or”; and added subsection (c1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-81, s. 9A, effective October 1, 2019, added subdivision (a)(1); redesignated former subdivision (a)(1) as present subdivision (a)(1a); added “or a prepaid health plan” at the end of subdivision (a)(2); and rewrote subsections (a2), (a3), and (a4).

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(a), effective October 1, 2019, rewrote the section.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(c), effective November 6, 2019, deleted “or State” following “Any” at the beginning of subsection (a2); and deleted “State or” following “program, any” in the first sentence of subdivision (a3).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” throughout subsection (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

For note, “Double Secret Protection: Bridging Federal and State Law to Protect Privacy Rights for Telemental and Mobile Health Users,” see 67 Duke L.J. 1115 (2018).

§ 122C-55. Exceptions; care and treatment. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. Any facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with any other facility when necessary to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
    1. “Client” includes an enrollee as defined in G.S. 108D-1 . (1a) Coordinate. — The provision, coordination, or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and other health or related services by one or more facilities and includes the referral of a client from one facility to another.
    2. Facility or area facility. — Include[s] an area authority or a prepaid health plan.
    3. Secretary. — Includes any primary care case management programs that contract with the Department to provide a primary care case management program for recipients of publicly funded health and related services.

      (a1) Any facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the Secretary, and the Secretary may share confidential information regarding any client with a facility when necessary to conduct quality assessment and improvement activities or to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client. For purposes of this subsection, subsection (a6), and subsection (a7) of this section, the purposes or activities for which confidential information may be disclosed include, but are not limited to, case management and care coordination, disease management, outcomes evaluation, the development of clinical guidelines and protocols, the development of care management plans and systems, population-based activities relating to improving or reducing health care costs, and the provision, coordination, or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and other health or related services.

      (a2) Any facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with any other area facility or State facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill when necessary to conduct payment activities relating to an individual served by the facility. Payment activities are activities undertaken by a facility to obtain payment or receive reimbursement for the provision of services and may include, but are not limited to, determinations of eligibility or coverage, coordination of benefits, determinations of cost-sharing amounts, claims management, claims processing, claims adjudication, claims appeals, billing and collection activities, medical necessity reviews, utilization management and review, precertification and preauthorization of services, concurrent and retrospective review of services, and appeals related to utilization management and review.

      (a3) Whenever there is reason to believe that a client is eligible for benefits through a Department program, any facility or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the Secretary, and the Secretary may share confidential information regarding any client with an area facility or State facility or the psychiatric services of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill. Disclosure is limited to that information necessary to establish initial eligibility for benefits, determine continued eligibility over time, and obtain reimbursement for the costs of services provided to the client.

      (a4) An area authority or prepaid health plan may share confidential information regarding any client with any area facility, and any area facility may share confidential information regarding any client of that facility with the area authority or prepaid health plan, when the area authority or prepaid health plan determines the disclosure is necessary to develop, manage, monitor, or evaluate the area authority’s or prepaid health plan’s network of qualified providers as provided in G.S. 122C-115.2(b)(1)b., G.S. 122C-141(a), Article 3 of Chapter 108D of the General Statutes, the State Plan, rules of the Secretary, and contracts between the facility and the Department. For the purposes of this subsection, the purposes or activities for which confidential information may be disclosed include, but are not limited to, quality assessment and improvement activities, provider accreditation and staff credentialing, developing contracts and negotiating rates, investigating and responding to client grievances and complaints, evaluating practitioner and provider performance, auditing functions, on-site monitoring, conducting consumer satisfaction studies, and collecting and analyzing performance data.

      (a5) Any area facility may share confidential information with any other area facility regarding an applicant when necessary to determine whether the applicant is eligible for area facility services. For the purpose of this subsection, the term “applicant” means an individual who contacts an area facility for services.

      (a6) When necessary to conduct quality assessment and improvement activities or to coordinate appropriate and effective care, treatment, or habilitation of the client, the Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management program, may disclose confidential information acquired pursuant to subsection (a1) of this section to a health care provider or other entity that has entered into a written agreement with the Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management program, to participate in the care management support network and systems developed and maintained by the primary care case manager for the purpose of coordinating and improving the quality of care for recipients of publicly funded health and related services. Health care providers and other entities receiving confidential information that has been disclosed pursuant to this subsection may use and disclose the information as permitted or required under 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 164, Subpart E.

      (a7) A facility may share confidential information with one or more HIPAA covered entities or business associates for the same purposes set forth in subsection (a1) of this section. Before making disclosures under this subsection, the facility shall inform the client or the client’s legally responsible person that the facility may make the disclosures unless the client or the client’s legally responsible person objects in writing or signs a non-disclosure form that shall be supplied by the facility. If the client or the client’s legally responsible person objects in writing or signs a non-disclosure form, the disclosures otherwise permitted by this subsection are prohibited. A covered entity or business associate receiving confidential information that has been disclosed by a facility pursuant to this subsection may use and disclose the information as permitted or required under 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 164, Subpart E. This confidential information, however, shall not be used or disclosed for discriminatory purposes including, without limitation, employment discrimination, medical insurance coverage or rate discrimination, or discrimination by law enforcement officers.

  2. A facility, physician, or other individual responsible for evaluation, management, supervision, or treatment of respondents examined or committed for outpatient treatment under the provisions of Article 5 of this Chapter may request, receive, and disclose confidential information to the extent necessary to fulfill the facility’s, physician’s, or individual’s responsibilities.
  3. A facility may furnish confidential information in its possession to the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction when requested by that department regarding any client of that facility when the inmate has been determined by the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction to be in need of treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse. The Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction may furnish to a facility confidential information in its possession about treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse that the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction has provided to any present or former inmate if the inmate is presently seeking treatment from the requesting facility or if the inmate has been involuntarily committed to the requesting facility for inpatient or outpatient treatment. Under the circumstances described in this subsection, the consent of the client or inmate is not required in order for this information to be furnished, and the information shall be furnished despite objection by the client or inmate. Confidential information disclosed pursuant to this subsection is restricted from further disclosure.

    (c1) (See editor’s note for effective date information) A facility may furnish confidential information in its possession to the sheriff of any county when requested by the sheriff regarding any client of that facility who is confined in the county’s jail or jail annex when the inmate has been determined by the county jail medical unit to be in need of treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse. The sheriff may furnish to a facility confidential information in its possession about treatment for mental illness, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse that the county jail medical unit has provided to any present or former inmate if the inmate is presently seeking treatment from the requesting facility or if the inmate has been involuntarily committed to the requesting facility for inpatient or outpatient treatment. Under the circumstances described in this subsection, the consent of the client or inmate is not required in order for this information to be furnished, and the information shall be furnished despite objection by the client or inmate. Confidential information disclosed pursuant to this subsection is restricted from further disclosure.

  4. A responsible professional may disclose confidential information when in the responsible professional’s opinion there is an imminent danger to the health or safety of the client or another individual or there is a likelihood of the commission of a felony or violent misdemeanor.
  5. A responsible professional may exchange confidential information with a physician or other health care provider that is providing emergency medical services to a client. Disclosure of the information is limited to that necessary to meet the emergency as determined by the responsible professional.

    (e1) A State facility may furnish client identifying information to the Department for the purpose of maintaining an index of clients served in State facilities that may be used by State facilities only if that information is necessary for the appropriate and effective evaluation, care, and treatment of the client.

    (e2) A responsible professional may disclose an advance instruction for mental health treatment or confidential information from an advance instruction to a physician, psychologist, or other qualified professional when the responsible professional determines that disclosure is necessary to give effect to or provide treatment in accordance with the advance instruction.

  6. A facility may disclose confidential information to a provider of support services whenever the facility has entered into a written agreement with a person to provide support services and the agreement includes a provision in which the provider of support services acknowledges that in receiving, storing, processing, or otherwise dealing with any confidential information, the provider of support services will safeguard and not further disclose the information.
  7. Whenever there is reason to believe that the client is eligible for financial benefits through a governmental agency, a facility may disclose confidential information to State, local, or federal government agencies. Except as provided in subsections (a3) and (g1) of this section, disclosure is limited to that confidential information necessary to establish financial benefits for a client. Except as provided in subsection (g1) of this section, after establishment of these benefits, the consent of the client or the client’s legally responsible person is required for further release of confidential information under this subsection. (g1) A State facility operated under the authority of G.S. 122C-181 may disclose confidential information for the purpose of collecting payment due the facility for the cost of care, treatment, or habilitation.

    (g2) Whenever there is reason to believe that the client is eligible for educational services through a governmental agency, a facility shall disclose client identifying information to the Department of Public Instruction. Disclosure is limited to that information necessary to establish, coordinate, or maintain educational services. The Department of Public Instruction may further disclose client identifying information to a local school administrative unit as necessary.

  8. Within a facility, employees, students, consultants, or volunteers involved in the care, treatment, or habilitation of a client may exchange confidential information as needed for the purpose of carrying out their responsibility in serving the client.
  9. Upon specific request, a responsible professional may release confidential information to a physician or psychologist who referred the client to the facility.
  10. Upon request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client or the client’s legally responsible person, the responsible professional shall provide the next of kin or other family member or the designee with notification of the client’s diagnosis, the prognosis, the medications prescribed, the dosage of the medications prescribed, the side effects of the medications prescribed, if any, and the progress of the client, if the client or the client’s legally responsible person has consented in writing, or the client has consented orally in the presence of a witness selected by the client, prior to the release of this information. Both the client’s or the legally responsible person’s consent and the release of this information shall be documented in the client’s medical record. This consent shall be valid for a specified length of time only and is subject to revocation by the consenting individual.
  11. Notwithstanding G.S. 122C-53(b) or G.S. 122C-206 , upon request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client or the client’s legally responsible person, the responsible professional shall provide the next of kin, the family member, or the designee, notification of the client’s admission to the facility, transfer to another facility, decision to leave the facility against medical advice, discharge from the facility, and referrals and appointment information for treatment after discharge, after notification to the client that this information has been requested.
  12. In response to a written request of the next of kin or other family member who has a legitimate role in the therapeutic services offered, or other person designated by the client, for additional information not provided for in subsections (j) and (k) of this section, and when the written request identifies the intended use for this information, the responsible professional shall, in a timely manner, do one or more of the following:
    1. Provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that providing this information will be to the client’s therapeutic benefit, if the client or the client’s legally responsible person has consented in writing to the release of the information requested.
    2. Refuse to provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that providing this information will be detrimental to the therapeutic relationship between client and professional.
    3. Refuse to provide the information requested based upon the responsible professional’s determination that the next of kin or family member or designee does not have a legitimate need for the information requested.
  13. The Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services shall adopt rules specifically to define the legitimate role referred to in subsections (j), (k), and (l) of this section.

History. 1955, c. 887, s. 12; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 5; c. 1408, s. 2; 1979, c. 147; 1983, c. 383, s. 10; c. 491; c. 638, s. 22; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 15; 1987, c. 638, ss. 2, 3; 1989, c. 141, s. 10; c. 438; c. 625, s. 8; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 27; 1991, c. 359, s. 1; c. 544, s. 1; 1998-198, s. 4; 2003-313, s. 3; 2009-65, s. 1(a), (b); 2009-487, s. 5; 2009-570, s. 43; 2011-102, ss. 3, 4; 2011-145, ss. 10.14, 19.1(h); 2011-314, s. 2(b); 2011-391, s. 23; 2014-100, s. 8.39(d); 2017-186, s. 2(kkkkk); 2018-33, s. 5; 2019-81, s. 9A; 2019-177, s. 6.1(a), (b); 2019-240, s. 26(c); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 10.14, effective July 1, 2011, would have amended subsection (g) and added subsection (g1), but was repealed by Session Laws 2011-391, s. 23, effective July 1, 2011.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2011.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, the bracketed text has been inserted in subdivision (a)(2).

This section was amended by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 5, effective October 1, 2019, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . The word “or” was not struck through preceding “State” in the first sentence of subsection (a2) and following “State” in subsection (a3). The language at the beginning of the October 1, 2019, version of subsection (a2) should probably read “Any State facility” and the language in the October 1, 2019, version of subsection (a3) should probably read “any State facility.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, as amended by Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(b), provides: “ G.S. 122C-55(c1), as enacted by Section 5 of this act, and Sections 44, 45(a), and 45(b) of this act are effective when the act becomes law. The remainder of this act becomes effective October 1, 2019, and applies to proceedings initiated on or after that date.”

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(c), provides, in part: “Subsection (b) of this section becomes retroactively effective June 22, 2018. Nothing in subsection (b) of this section imposes liability on a facility or sheriff for failing to furnish confidential information before the date this act becomes law.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-65, s. 1(a) and (b), effective June 8, 2009, rewrote subsection (a1) and added subsection (a6).

Session Laws 2009-487, s. 5, effective August 26, 2009, inserted “ ‘facility’ includes an LME and” in the last sentence of subsection (a1).

Session Laws 2009-570, s. 43, effective August 28, 2009, substituted “the Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program” for “a Department’s Community Care of North Carolina Program” in the last sentence of subsection (a6).

Session Laws 2011-102, ss. 3, 4, effective June 2, 2011, in subsection (g), substituted “subsections (a3) and (g1) of this section” for “G.S. 122C-55(a3)” in the second sentence, and added “Except as provided in subsection (g1) of this section” at the beginning of the last sentence.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(d), effective July 1, 2014, added subsection (g2).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(kkkkk), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout subsection (c).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 5, rewrote subsection (a); in subsection (a1), deleted the former last sentence, which read: “As used in this section, ‘facility’ includes an LME and ‘Secretary’ includes the Community Care of North Carolina Program, or other primary care case management programs that contract with the Department to provide a primary care case management program for recipients of publicly funded health and related services.”; in subsection (a2), in the first sentence, deleted “area” following “Any” and, in the second sentence, substituted “payment or receive reimbursement” for “or provide reimbursement”; in subsection (a3), deleted “area” following “State or”; and added subsection (c1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-81, s. 9A, effective October 1, 2019, added subdivision (a)(1); redesignated former subdivision (a)(1) as present subdivision (a)(1a); added “or a prepaid health plan” at the end of subdivision (a)(2); and rewrote subsections (a2), (a3), and (a4).

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 6.1(a), effective October 1, 2019, rewrote the section.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(c), effective November 6, 2019, deleted “or State” following “Any” at the beginning of subsection (a2); and deleted “State or” following “program, any” in the first sentence of subdivision (a3).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” throughout subsection (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

For note, “Double Secret Protection: Bridging Federal and State Law to Protect Privacy Rights for Telemental and Mobile Health Users,” see 67 Duke L.J. 1115 (2018).

§ 122C-56. Exceptions; research and planning.

  1. The Secretary may require information that does not identify clients from State and area facilities for purposes of preparing statistical reports of activities and services and for planning and study. The Secretary may also receive confidential information from State and area facilities when specifically required by other State or federal law.
  2. The Secretary may have access to confidential information from private or public agencies or agents for purposes of research and evaluation in the areas of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse. No confidential information shall be further disclosed.
  3. A facility may disclose confidential information to persons responsible for conducting general research or clinical, financial, or administrative audits if there is a justifiable documented need for this information. A person receiving the information may not directly or indirectly identify any client in any report of the research or audit or otherwise disclose client identity in any way.

History. 1965, c. 800, s. 4; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 9.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

§ 122C-56.1. Exceptions; security recordings.

  1. Security recordings are not a public record under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes and are confidential information under this Chapter.
  2. A State facility is not required to disclose its security recordings unless required under federal law or compelled by a court of competent jurisdiction.
  3. A State facility shall allow viewing of security recordings by an internal client advocate.
  4. A State facility may allow viewing of a security recording by a client or their legally responsible person if, in the opinion of the responsible professional, it is determined to be in the best interest of the client.

History. 2019-240, s. 20(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 28, made this section effective November 6, 2019.

§ 122C-57. Right to treatment and consent to treatment.

  1. Each client who is admitted to and is receiving services from a facility has the right to receive age-appropriate treatment for a mental illness, an intellectual or other developmental disability, substance abuse, or a combination thereof. Each client within 30 days of admission to a facility shall have an individual written treatment or habilitation plan implemented by the facility. The client and the client’s legally responsible person shall be informed in advance of the potential risks and alleged benefits of the treatment choices.
  2. Each client has the right to be free from unnecessary or excessive medication. Medication shall not be used for punishment, discipline, or staff convenience.
  3. Medication shall be administered in accordance with accepted medical standards and only upon the order of a physician as documented in the client’s record.
  4. Each voluntarily admitted client or the client’s legally responsible person (including a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney) has the right to consent to or refuse any treatment offered by the facility. Consent may be withdrawn at any time by the person who gave the consent. If treatment is refused, the qualified professional shall determine whether treatment in some other modality is possible. If all appropriate treatment modalities are refused, the voluntarily admitted client may be discharged. In an emergency, a voluntarily admitted client may be administered treatment or medication, other than those specified in subsection (f) of this section, despite the refusal of the client or the client’s legally responsible person, even if the client’s refusal is expressed in a valid advance instruction for mental health treatment. The Commission may adopt rules to provide a procedure to be followed when a voluntarily admitted client refuses treatment. (d1) Except as provided in G.S. 90-21.4 , discharge of a voluntarily admitted minor from treatment shall include notice to and consultation with the minor’s legally responsible person and in no event shall a minor be discharged from treatment upon the minor’s request alone.
  5. In the case of an involuntarily committed client, treatment measures other than those requiring express written consent as specified in subsection (f) of this section may be given despite the refusal of the client, the client’s legally responsible person, a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney, or the client’s refusal expressed in a valid advance instruction for mental health treatment in the event of an emergency or when consideration of side effects related to the specific treatment measure is given and in the professional judgment, as documented in the client’s record, of the treating physician and a second physician, who is either the director of clinical services of the facility, or the director’s designee, that any of the following is true:
    1. The client, without the benefit of the specific treatment measure, is incapable of participating in any available treatment plan which will give the client a realistic opportunity of improving the client’s condition.
    2. There is, without the benefit of the specific treatment measure, a significant possibility that the client will harm self or others before improvement of the client’s condition is realized.
  6. Treatment involving electroshock therapy, the use of experimental drugs or procedures, or surgery other than emergency surgery may not be given without the express and informed written consent of the client, the client’s legally responsible person, a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney, or the client’s consent expressed in a valid advance instruction for mental health treatment. This consent may be withdrawn at any time by the person who gave the consent. The Commission may adopt rules specifying other therapeutic and diagnostic procedures that require the express and informed written consent of the client, the client’s legally responsible person, or a health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 6, 7; 1981, c. 328, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1995, c. 336, s. 1; 1997-442, s. 3; 1998-198, s. 5; 1998-217, s. 53(a)(4); 1999-456, s. 4; 2007-502, s. 15(b); 2019-76, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

The subsection designation (d1) was assigned by the Revisor of Statutes, the designation in Session Laws 1995, c. 336, s. 1 having been (d)(1).

Session Laws 2007-502, ss. 18, 19, provide: “18. The Legislative Research Commission shall study the issue of whether North Carolina law should be amended to allow a person to require life-prolonging measures. The LRC shall involve all stakeholders in the study. The LRC shall report its recommendations to the 2008 Session of the 2007 General Assembly.

“19. The North Carolina Institute of Medicine (Institute) shall study issues related to the provision of end-of-life medical care in North Carolina. As part of the study, the Division of Health Service Regulation, Department of Health and Human Services, and the North Carolina Board of Medicine shall provide to the Institute nonidentifying information regarding claims and complaints related to end-of-life medical treatment by health care providers that was contrary to the express wishes of either the patient or a person authorized by law to make treatment decisions on behalf of the patient. The Institute may review any other data related to end-of-life medical care and treatment the Institute determines is relevant.

“The purpose of this study is to determine whether statutory changes related to advance directives and health care powers of attorney impact the type and quantity of end-of-life medical care provided to patients, whether the patient’s or patient representative’s express wishes regarding the provision of treatment at the end of life are being honored, and whether there is any change in the number of persons who request continued treatment at the end of their lives, but do not receive that treatment.

“The Institute shall report its findings to the following entities no later than January 30, 2013:

“(1) The 2013 General Assembly.

“(2) The North Carolina Bar Association.

“(3) The North Carolina Medical Society.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 2 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-502, s. 15(b), effective October 1, 2007, in subsection (d), rewrote the first and next-to-last sentences.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 2, substituted “a mental illness, an intellectual or other developmental disability, substance abuse, or a combination thereof” for “mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse illness or disability” at the end of the first sentence of subsection (a); substituted “that any of the following is true” for “either” in subsection (e); and made a stylistic change. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Subsection (a) sets a level of care to which each person receiving services from a facility is entitled and if the person is no longer entitled to receive services, they have no entitlement to treatment or care pursuant to this subsection. In re Royal, 128 N.C. App. 645, 495 S.E.2d 404, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 153 (1998).

§ 122C-58. Civil rights and civil remedies.

Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, each adult client of a facility keeps the same right as any other citizen of North Carolina to exercise all civil rights, including the right to dispose of property, execute instruments, make purchases, enter into contractual relationships, register and vote, bring civil actions, and marry and get a divorce, unless the exercise of a civil right has been precluded by an unrevoked adjudication of incompetency. This section shall not be construed as validating the act of any client who was in fact incompetent at the time he performed the act.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 2-5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The case annotated below was decided under former statutory provisions.

Prisoners receiving mental health care were not covered by former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62); the statutes applied only to mental health patients who were not imprisoned with the Department of Correction. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

With respect to the rights of prisoners receiving care in facilities operated by the Department of Human Resources, G.S. 143B-261.1 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto apply, rather than former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62), as they do to those prisoners who remained in prison for their mental health care. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982).

§ 122C-59. Use of corporal punishment.

Corporal punishment may not be inflicted upon any client.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-60. Use of physical restraints or seclusion.

  1. Physical restraint or seclusion of a client shall be employed only when there is imminent danger of abuse or injury to the client or others, when substantial property damage is occurring, or when the restraint or seclusion is necessary as a measure of therapeutic treatment. For purposes of this section, a technique to reenact the birthing process as defined by G.S. 14-401.21 is not a measure of therapeutic treatment. All instances of restraint or seclusion and the detailed reasons for such action shall be documented in the client’s record. Each client who is restrained or secluded shall be observed frequently, and a written notation of the observation shall be made in the client’s record. (a1) A facility that employs physical restraint or seclusion of a client shall collect data on the use of the restraints and seclusion. The data shall reflect for each incidence, the type of procedure used, the length of time employed, alternatives considered or employed, and the effectiveness of the procedure or alternative employed. The facility shall analyze the data on at least a quarterly basis to monitor effectiveness, determine trends, and take corrective action where necessary. The facility shall make the data available to the Secretary upon request. Nothing in this subsection abrogates State or federal law or requirements pertaining to the confidentiality, privilege, or other prohibition against disclosure of information provided to the Secretary under this subsection. In reviewing data requested under this subsection, the Secretary shall adhere to State and federal requirements of confidentiality, privilege, and other prohibitions against disclosure and release applicable to the information received under this subsection.

    (a2) Facilities shall implement policies and practices that emphasize the use of alternatives to physical restraint and seclusion. Physical restraint and seclusion may be employed only by staff who have been trained and have demonstrated competence in the proper use of and alternatives to these procedures. Facilities shall ensure that staff authorized to employ and terminate these procedures are retrained and have demonstrated competence at least annually.

  2. The Commission shall adopt rules to implement this section. In adopting rules, the Commission shall take into consideration federal regulations and national accreditation standards. Rules adopted by the Commission shall include:
    1. Staff training and competence in:
      1. The use of positive behavioral supports.
      2. Communication strategies for defusing and deescalating potentially dangerous behavior.
      3. Monitoring vital indicators.
      4. Administration of CPR.
      5. Debriefing with client and staff.
      6. Methods for determining staff competence, including qualifications of trainers and training curricula.
      7. Other areas to ensure the safe and appropriate use of restraints and seclusion.
    2. Other matters relating to the use of physical restraint or seclusion of clients necessary to ensure the safety of clients and others.The Department may investigate complaints and inspect a facility at any time to ensure compliance with this section.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2000-129, s. 1; 2003-205, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

The preamble to Session Laws 2003-205, provides: “Whereas, United States Representative Sue Myrick, a member of the North Carolina congressional delegation, introduced House Concurrent Resolution 435 in Congress encouraging states to outlaw ‘rebirthing’; and

“Whereas, the United States Congress adopted House Concurrent Resolution 435, which passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 397-0; and

“Whereas, in House Concurrent Resolution 435, the United States Congress expressed the sense that the technique known as ‘rebirthing’, a form of ‘attachment therapy’, is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be prohibited; and

“Whereas, on April 18, 2000, Candace Newmaker, a child from North Carolina, died from use of the ‘rebirthing technique’, and four other children have died from other forms of ‘attachment therapy’; and

“Whereas, the American Psychological Association does not recognize ‘rebirthing’ as proper treatment; Now, therefore,

“The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:”

CASE NOTES

Standard of Liability. —

Adopting the standard enunciated in Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 102 S. Ct. 2452, 73 L. Ed. 2d 28 (1982), the court held that so long as the requisite procedures were followed, and the decision to restrain a plaintiff, a voluntarily admitted patient at a State mental hospital, was an exercise of professional judgment, the defendants were not liable to the plaintiff for their actions. Alt v. Parker, 112 N.C. App. 307, 435 S.E.2d 773, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 1097 (1993).

§ 122C-61. Treatment rights in 24-hour facilities.

In addition to the rights set forth in G.S. 122C-57 , each client who is receiving services at a 24-hour facility has the following rights:

  1. The right to receive necessary treatment for and prevention of physical ailments based upon the client’s condition and projected length of stay. The facility may seek to collect appropriate reimbursement for its costs in providing the treatment and prevention; and
  2. The right to have, as soon as practical during treatment or habilitation but not later than the time of discharge, an individualized written discharge plan containing recommendations for further services designed to enable the client to live as normally as possible. A discharge plan may not be required when it is not feasible because of an unanticipated discontinuation of a client’s treatment. With the consent of the client or his legally responsible person, the professionals responsible for the plans shall contact appropriate agencies at the client’s destination or in his home community before formulating the recommendations. A copy of the plan shall be furnished to the client or to his legally responsible person and, with the consent of the client, to the client’s next of kin.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 6, 7; 1981, c. 328, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-62. Additional rights in 24-hour facilities. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. In addition to the rights enumerated in G.S. 122C-51 through G.S. 122C-61 , each adult client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility keeps the right to:
    1. Send and receive sealed mail and have access to writing material, postage, and staff assistance when necessary;
    2. Contact and consult with, at his own expense and at no cost to the facility, legal counsel, private physicians, and private mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse professionals of his choice; and
    3. Contact and consult with a client advocate if there is a client advocate. The rights specified in this subsection may not be restricted by the facility and each adult client may exercise these rights at all reasonable times.
  2. Except as provided in subsections (e) and (h) of this section, each adult client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility at all times keeps the right to:
    1. Make and receive confidential telephone calls. All long distance calls shall be paid for by the client at the time of making the call or made collect to the receiving party;
    2. Receive visitors between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. for a period of at least six hours daily, two hours of which shall be after 6:00 p.m.; however visiting shall not take precedence over therapies;
    3. Communicate and meet under appropriate supervision with individuals of his own choice upon the consent of the individuals;
    4. Make visits outside the custody of the facility unless:
      1. Commitment proceedings were initiated as the result of the client’s being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity or incapable of proceeding;
      2. The client was voluntarily admitted or committed to the facility while under order of commitment to a correctional facility of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety; or
      3. The client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ; A court order may expressly authorize visits otherwise prohibited by the existence of the conditions prescribed by this subdivision;
    5. Be out of doors daily and have access to facilities and equipment for physical exercise several times a week;
    6. Except as prohibited by law, keep and use personal clothing and possessions, unless the client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ;
    7. Participate in religious worship;
    8. Keep and spend a reasonable sum of his own money;
    9. Retain a driver’s license, unless otherwise prohibited by Chapter 20 of the General Statutes; and
    10. Have access to individual storage space for his private use.
  3. In addition to the rights enumerated in G.S. 122C-51 through G.S. 122C-57 and G.S. 122C-59 through G.S. 122C-61 , each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility has the right to have access to proper adult supervision and guidance. In recognition of the minor’s status as a developing individual, the minor shall be provided opportunities to enable him to mature physically, emotionally, intellectually, socially, and vocationally. In view of the physical, emotional, and intellectual immaturity of the minor, the 24-hour facility shall provide appropriate structure, supervision and control consistent with the rights given to the minor pursuant to this Part. The facility shall also, where practical, make reasonable efforts to ensure that each minor client receives treatment apart and separate from adult clients unless the treatment needs of the minor client dictate otherwise.Each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation from a 24-hour facility has the right to:
    1. Communicate and consult with his parents or guardian or the agency or individual having legal custody of him;
    2. Contact and consult with, at his own expense or that of his legally responsible person and at no cost to the facility, legal counsel, private physicians, private mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse professionals, of his or his legally responsible person’s choice; and
    3. Contact and consult with a client advocate, if there is a client advocate. The rights specified in this subsection may not be restricted by the facility and each minor client may exercise these rights at all reasonable times.
  4. Except as provided in subsections (e) and (h) of this section, each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility has the right to:
    1. Make and receive telephone calls. All long distance calls shall be paid for by the client at the time of making the call or made collect to the receiving party;
    2. Send and receive mail and have access to writing materials, postage, and staff assistance when necessary;
    3. Under appropriate supervision, receive visitors between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. for a period of at least six hours daily, two hours of which shall be after 6:00 p.m.; however visiting shall not take precedence over school or therapies;
    4. Receive special education and vocational training in accordance with federal and State law;
    5. Be out of doors daily and participate in play, recreation, and physical exercise on a regular basis in accordance with his needs;
    6. Except as prohibited by law, keep and use personal clothing and possessions under appropriate supervision, unless the client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ;
    7. Participate in religious worship;
    8. Have access to individual storage space for the safekeeping of personal belongings;
    9. Have access to and spend a reasonable sum of his own money; and
    10. Retain a driver’s license, unless otherwise prohibited by Chapter 20 of the General Statutes.
  5. No right enumerated in subsections (b) or (d) of this section may be limited or restricted except by the qualified professional responsible for the formulation of the client’s treatment or habilitation plan. A written statement shall be placed in the client’s record that indicates the detailed reason for the restriction. The restriction shall be reasonable and related to the client’s treatment or habilitation needs. A restriction is effective for a period not to exceed 30 days. An evaluation of each restriction shall be conducted by the qualified professional at least every seven days, at which time the restriction may be removed. Each evaluation of a restriction shall be documented in the client’s record. Restrictions on rights may be renewed only by a written statement entered by the qualified professional in the client’s record that states the reason for the renewal of the restriction. In the case of an adult client who has not been adjudicated incompetent, in each instance of an initial restriction or renewal of a restriction of rights, an individual designated by the client shall, upon the consent of the client, be notified of the restriction and of the reason for it. In the case of a minor client or an incompetent adult client, the legally responsible person shall be notified of each instance of an initial restriction or renewal of a restriction of rights and of the reason for it. Notification of the designated individual or legally responsible person shall be documented in writing in the client’s record.
  6. The Commission may adopt rules to implement subsection (e) of this section.
  7. With regard to clients being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 or clients in a facility for substance abuse, and notwithstanding the prior provisions of this section, the Commission may adopt rules restricting the rights set forth under (b)(2), (b)(3), and (d)(3) of this section if restrictions are necessary and reasonable in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the client involved or other clients.
  8. The rights stated in subdivisions (b)(2), (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(10), (d)(3), (d)(5) and (d)(8) may be modified in a general hospital by that hospital to be the same as for other patients in that hospital; provided that any restriction of a specific client’s rights shall be done in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this section.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 2-5, 8; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 10; 1995, c. 299, s. 2; 1997-456, s. 27; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(lllll).

Editor’s Note.

As the text that formerly made up this Article has been recodified as Part 1 of this article by Session Laws 1997-442, the term “this Part” was substituted for “this Article” in the third sentence of subsection (c) by direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2( lllll ), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (b)(4)b.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in sub-subdivision (b)(4)b. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

CASE NOTES

Prisoners receiving mental health care were not covered by former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62); the statutes applied only to mental health patients who were not imprisoned with the Department of Correction. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982) (decided under prior law) .

With respect to the rights of prisoners receiving care in facilities operated by the Department of Human Resources, G.S. 143B-261.1 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto apply, rather than former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62), as they do to those prisoners who remained in prison for their mental health care. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982) (decided under prior law) .

Supervision Ratio Proper. —

Trial court did not err by ordering a one-to-five ratio of staff supervision, as the government’s interest in keeping the public safe, in conjunction with the plain language of G.S. 122C-62 , provided the trial court jurisdiction to determine the parameters of the confinement of a not guilty by reason of insanity defendant within the statutory structure of G.S. 122C-62 , including the ability to leave the facility to which they are validly committed. In re E.W.P., 857 S.E.2d 865 (Apr. 20, 2021).

Unsupervised Pass Denied. —

Trial court did not err in denying recommendation of unsupervised passes for a not guilty by reason of insanity patient; G.S. 122C-62(b)(4) required court approval via a court order prior to the patient being granted visits outside the custody of the facility, and visits outside the custody of the facility included unsupervised passes or visits on the hospital premises in addition to off-campus visits. In re Williamson, 151 N.C. App. 260, 564 S.E.2d 915, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 711 (2002).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

A minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation from a 24-hour facility, as that term is defined in G.S. 122C-3(14)g, does not have the right to choose at his or her own expense or the expense of his or her legally responsible person, an attorney of the minor client’s choice. The legally responsible person is the only one who can choose an attorney for the minor client unless the minor is over the age of 16 and emancipated. See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

Although a minor cannot obtain legal representation without the consent of the legally responsible person, the rights of the child can be adequately protected. First, the Department of Social Services can conduct an investigation of the legally responsible person pursuant to G.S. 7A-542 et seq. (see now G.S. 7B-300 et seq.), the guardian ad litem program can provide additional support for abused, neglected, or dependent juveniles, including legal support and, a minor receives representation for the commitment proceedings by virtue of G.S. 122C-224.1 and G.S. 122C-270 . See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

§ 122C-62. Additional rights in 24-hour facilities. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. In addition to the rights enumerated in G.S. 122C-51 through G.S. 122C-61 , each adult client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility keeps the right to:
    1. Send and receive sealed mail and have access to writing material, postage, and staff assistance when necessary;
    2. Contact and consult with, at his own expense and at no cost to the facility, legal counsel, private physicians, and private mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse professionals of his choice; and
    3. Contact and consult with a client advocate if there is a client advocate. The rights specified in this subsection may not be restricted by the facility and each adult client may exercise these rights at all reasonable times.
  2. Except as provided in subsections (e) and (h) of this section, each adult client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility at all times keeps the right to:
    1. Make and receive confidential telephone calls. All long distance calls shall be paid for by the client at the time of making the call or made collect to the receiving party;
    2. Receive visitors between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. for a period of at least six hours daily, two hours of which shall be after 6:00 p.m.; however visiting shall not take precedence over therapies;
    3. Communicate and meet under appropriate supervision with individuals of his own choice upon the consent of the individuals;
    4. Make visits outside the custody of the facility unless:
      1. Commitment proceedings were initiated as the result of the client’s being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity or incapable of proceeding;
      2. The client was voluntarily admitted or committed to the facility while under order of commitment to a correctional facility of the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction; or
      3. The client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ; A court order may expressly authorize visits otherwise prohibited by the existence of the conditions prescribed by this subdivision;
    5. Be out of doors daily and have access to facilities and equipment for physical exercise several times a week;
    6. Except as prohibited by law, keep and use personal clothing and possessions, unless the client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ;
    7. Participate in religious worship;
    8. Keep and spend a reasonable sum of his own money;
    9. Retain a driver’s license, unless otherwise prohibited by Chapter 20 of the General Statutes; and
    10. Have access to individual storage space for his private use.
  3. In addition to the rights enumerated in G.S. 122C-51 through G.S. 122C-57 and G.S. 122C-59 through G.S. 122C-61 , each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility has the right to have access to proper adult supervision and guidance. In recognition of the minor’s status as a developing individual, the minor shall be provided opportunities to enable him to mature physically, emotionally, intellectually, socially, and vocationally. In view of the physical, emotional, and intellectual immaturity of the minor, the 24-hour facility shall provide appropriate structure, supervision and control consistent with the rights given to the minor pursuant to this Part. The facility shall also, where practical, make reasonable efforts to ensure that each minor client receives treatment apart and separate from adult clients unless the treatment needs of the minor client dictate otherwise.Each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation from a 24-hour facility has the right to:
    1. Communicate and consult with his parents or guardian or the agency or individual having legal custody of him;
    2. Contact and consult with, at his own expense or that of his legally responsible person and at no cost to the facility, legal counsel, private physicians, private mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse professionals, of his or his legally responsible person’s choice; and
    3. Contact and consult with a client advocate, if there is a client advocate. The rights specified in this subsection may not be restricted by the facility and each minor client may exercise these rights at all reasonable times.
  4. Except as provided in subsections (e) and (h) of this section, each minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility has the right to:
    1. Make and receive telephone calls. All long distance calls shall be paid for by the client at the time of making the call or made collect to the receiving party;
    2. Send and receive mail and have access to writing materials, postage, and staff assistance when necessary;
    3. Under appropriate supervision, receive visitors between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. for a period of at least six hours daily, two hours of which shall be after 6:00 p.m.; however visiting shall not take precedence over school or therapies;
    4. Receive special education and vocational training in accordance with federal and State law;
    5. Be out of doors daily and participate in play, recreation, and physical exercise on a regular basis in accordance with his needs;
    6. Except as prohibited by law, keep and use personal clothing and possessions under appropriate supervision, unless the client is being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 ;
    7. Participate in religious worship;
    8. Have access to individual storage space for the safekeeping of personal belongings;
    9. Have access to and spend a reasonable sum of his own money; and
    10. Retain a driver’s license, unless otherwise prohibited by Chapter 20 of the General Statutes.
  5. No right enumerated in subsections (b) or (d) of this section may be limited or restricted except by the qualified professional responsible for the formulation of the client’s treatment or habilitation plan. A written statement shall be placed in the client’s record that indicates the detailed reason for the restriction. The restriction shall be reasonable and related to the client’s treatment or habilitation needs. A restriction is effective for a period not to exceed 30 days. An evaluation of each restriction shall be conducted by the qualified professional at least every seven days, at which time the restriction may be removed. Each evaluation of a restriction shall be documented in the client’s record. Restrictions on rights may be renewed only by a written statement entered by the qualified professional in the client’s record that states the reason for the renewal of the restriction. In the case of an adult client who has not been adjudicated incompetent, in each instance of an initial restriction or renewal of a restriction of rights, an individual designated by the client shall, upon the consent of the client, be notified of the restriction and of the reason for it. In the case of a minor client or an incompetent adult client, the legally responsible person shall be notified of each instance of an initial restriction or renewal of a restriction of rights and of the reason for it. Notification of the designated individual or legally responsible person shall be documented in writing in the client’s record.
  6. The Commission may adopt rules to implement subsection (e) of this section.
  7. With regard to clients being held to determine capacity to proceed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 or clients in a facility for substance abuse, and notwithstanding the prior provisions of this section, the Commission may adopt rules restricting the rights set forth under (b)(2), (b)(3), and (d)(3) of this section if restrictions are necessary and reasonable in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the client involved or other clients.
  8. The rights stated in subdivisions (b)(2), (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(10), (d)(3), (d)(5) and (d)(8) may be modified in a general hospital by that hospital to be the same as for other patients in that hospital; provided that any restriction of a specific client’s rights shall be done in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this section.

History. 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 1436, ss. 2-5, 8; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 10; 1995, c. 299, s. 2; 1997-456, s. 27; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(lllll); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p).

Editor’s Note.

As the text that formerly made up this Article has been recodified as Part 1 of this article by Session Laws 1997-442, the term “this Part” was substituted for “this Article” in the third sentence of subsection (c) by direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2( lllll ), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (b)(4)b.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in sub-subdivision (b)(4)b. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

CASE NOTES

Prisoners receiving mental health care were not covered by former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62); the statutes applied only to mental health patients who were not imprisoned with the Department of Correction. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982) (decided under prior law) .

With respect to the rights of prisoners receiving care in facilities operated by the Department of Human Resources, G.S. 143B-261.1 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto apply, rather than former G.S. 122-36 (see now G.S. 122C-3 ) and former G.S. 122-55.2 (see now G.S. 122C-53 , 122C-58, and 122C-62), as they do to those prisoners who remained in prison for their mental health care. Baugh v. Woodard, 56 N.C. App. 180, 287 S.E.2d 412, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2346 (1982) (decided under prior law) .

Supervision Ratio Proper. —

Trial court did not err by ordering a one-to-five ratio of staff supervision, as the government’s interest in keeping the public safe, in conjunction with the plain language of G.S. 122C-62 , provided the trial court jurisdiction to determine the parameters of the confinement of a not guilty by reason of insanity defendant within the statutory structure of G.S. 122C-62 , including the ability to leave the facility to which they are validly committed. In re E.W.P., 857 S.E.2d 865 (Apr. 20, 2021).

Unsupervised Pass Denied. —

Trial court did not err in denying recommendation of unsupervised passes for a not guilty by reason of insanity patient; G.S. 122C-62(b)(4) required court approval via a court order prior to the patient being granted visits outside the custody of the facility, and visits outside the custody of the facility included unsupervised passes or visits on the hospital premises in addition to off-campus visits. In re Williamson, 151 N.C. App. 260, 564 S.E.2d 915, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 711 (2002).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

A minor client who is receiving treatment or habilitation from a 24-hour facility, as that term is defined in G.S. 122C-3(14)g, does not have the right to choose at his or her own expense or the expense of his or her legally responsible person, an attorney of the minor client’s choice. The legally responsible person is the only one who can choose an attorney for the minor client unless the minor is over the age of 16 and emancipated. See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

Although a minor cannot obtain legal representation without the consent of the legally responsible person, the rights of the child can be adequately protected. First, the Department of Social Services can conduct an investigation of the legally responsible person pursuant to G.S. 7A-542 et seq. (see now G.S. 7B-300 et seq.), the guardian ad litem program can provide additional support for abused, neglected, or dependent juveniles, including legal support and, a minor receives representation for the commitment proceedings by virtue of G.S. 122C-224.1 and G.S. 122C-270 . See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

§ 122C-63. Assurance for continuity of care for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

  1. Any individual with an intellectual disability admitted for residential care or treatment for other than respite or emergency care to any residential facility operated under the authority of this Chapter and supported all or in part by State-appropriated funds has the right to residential placement in an alternative facility if the client is in need of placement and if the original facility can no longer provide the necessary care or treatment.
  2. The operator of a residential facility providing residential care or treatment, for other than respite or emergency care, for individuals with intellectual disabilities shall notify the area authority serving the client’s county of residence of the operator’s intent to close a facility or to discharge a client who may be in need of continuing care at least 60 days prior to the closing or discharge.The operator’s notification to the area authority of intent to close a facility or to discharge a client who may be in need of continuing care constitutes the operator’s acknowledgement of the obligation to continue to serve the client until whichever of the following occurs first:
    1. The area authority determines that the client is not in need of continuing care.
    2. The client is moved to an alternative residential placement.
    3. Sixty days have elapsed.In cases in which the safety of the client who may be in need of continuing care, of other clients, of the staff of the residential facility, or of the general public, is concerned, this 60-day notification period may be waived by securing an emergency placement in a more secure and safe facility. The operator of the residential facility shall notify the area authority that an emergency placement has been arranged within 24 hours of the placement. The area authority and the Secretary shall retain their respective responsibilities upon receipt of this notice.
  3. An individual who may be in need of continuing care may be discharged from a residential facility without further claim for continuing care against the area authority or the State if any of the following is true:
    1. After the parent or guardian, if the client is a minor or an adjudicated incompetent adult, or the client, if an adult not adjudicated incompetent, has entered into a contract with the operator upon the client’s admission to the original residential facility, the parent, guardian, or client who entered into the contract refuses to carry out the contract.
    2. After an alternative placement for a client in need of continuing care is located, the parent or guardian who admitted the client to the residential facility, if the client is a minor or an adjudicated incompetent adult, or the client, if the client is an adult not adjudicated incompetent, refuses the alternative placement.
  4. Decisions made by the area authority regarding the need for continued placement or regarding the availability of an alternative placement of a client may be appealed pursuant to the appeals process of the area authority and subsequently to the Secretary or the Commission under their rules. If the appeal process extends beyond the operator’s 60-day obligation to continue to serve the client, the Secretary shall arrange a temporary placement in a State developmental center pending the outcome of the appeal.
  5. The area authority that serves the county of residence of the client is responsible for assessing the need for continuity of care and for the coordination of the placement among available public and private facilities whenever the authority is notified that a client may be in need of continuing care. If an alternative placement is not available beyond the operator’s 60-day obligation to continue to serve the client, the Secretary shall arrange for a temporary placement in a State developmental center. The area authority shall retain responsibility for coordination of placement during a temporary placement in a State developmental center.
  6. The Secretary is responsible for coordinative and financial assistance to the area authority in the performing of its duties to coordinate placement so as to assure continuity of care and for assuring a continuity of care placement beyond the operator’s 60-day obligation period.
  7. The area authority’s financial responsibility, through local and allocated State resources, is limited to the following:
    1. Costs relating to the identification and coordination of alternative placements.
    2. If the original facility is an area facility, maintenance of the client in the original facility for up to 60 days.
    3. Release of allocated categorical State funds used to support the care or treatment of the specific client at the time of alternative placement if the Secretary requires the release.
  8. In accordance with G.S. 143B-147(a)(1) the Commission shall develop programmatic rules to implement this section, and, in accordance with G.S. 122C-112(a)(6), the Secretary shall adopt budgetary rules to implement this section.

History. 1981, c. 1012; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2019-76, s. 3.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 3 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 3, rewrote this section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-64. Client rights and human rights committees.

Client rights and human rights committees responsible for protecting the rights of clients shall be established at each State facility, for each local management entity, and provider agency. The Commission shall adopt rules for the establishment, composition, and duties of the committees and procedures for appointment and coordination with the State and Local Consumer Advocacy programs. The membership of the client rights and human rights committee for a multicounty program or local management entity shall include a representative from each of the participating counties.

History. 1985-589, s. 2; 2001-437, s. 1.3; 2009-190, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-190, s. 1, effective June 26, 2009, inserted “Client rights and” in the section catchline; in the first sentence, substituted “Client rights and human rights” for “Human rights” at the beginning, and “facility, for each local management entity, and provider agency” for “facility and for each area authority and county program” at the end, rewrote the last sentence which read: “In multicounty area authorities and multicounty programs, the membership of the human rights committee shall include a representative from each of the participating counties.”

§ 122C-65. Offenses relating to clients.

  1. For the protection of clients receiving treatment or habilitation in a 24-hour facility, it is unlawful for any individual who is not a developmentally disabled client in a facility:
    1. To assist, advise, or solicit, or to offer to assist, advise, or solicit a client of a facility to leave without authority;
    2. To transport or to offer to transport a client of a facility to or from any place without the facility’s authority;
    3. To receive or to offer to receive a minor client of a facility into any place, structure, building, or conveyance for the purpose of engaging in any act that would constitute a sex offense, or to solicit a minor client of a facility to engage in any act that would constitute a sex offense;
    4. To hide an individual who has left a facility without authority; or
    5. To engage in, or offer to engage in an act with a client of a facility that would constitute a sex offense.
  2. Violation of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 53; Rev., s. 3694; C.S., s. 6171; 1963, c. 1184, ss. 1, 6; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 11; 1993, c. 539, s. 921; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).

§ 122C-66. Protection from abuse and exploitation; reporting.

  1. An employee of or a volunteer at a facility who, other than as a part of generally accepted medical or therapeutic procedure, knowingly causes pain or injury to a client is guilty of a Class A1 misdemeanor. Any employee or volunteer who uses reasonable force to carry out the provisions of G.S. 122C-60 or to protect himself or others from a violent client does not violate this subsection. (a1) An employee of or a volunteer at a facility who borrows or takes personal property from a client is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any employee or volunteer who uses reasonable force to carry out the provisions of G.S. 122C-60 or to protect himself or others from a violent client does not violate this subsection.
  2. An employee of or a volunteer at a facility who witnesses or has knowledge of a violation of subsection (a), subsection (a1), or of an accidental injury to a client shall report the violation or accidental injury to authorized personnel designated by the facility. No employee making a report may be threatened or harassed by any other employee or volunteer on account of the report. Violation of this subsection is a Class 1 misdemeanor.

    (b1) The employee of or a volunteer at a facility who witnesses a client become a victim of a violation of Article 7A or Article 26 of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes shall report the allegations within 24 hours after witnessing the violation to one of the following: (i) the department of social services in the county where the facility serves the client; (ii) the district attorney in the district where the facility serves the client; or (iii) the appropriate local law enforcement agency in the city or county where the facility serves the client. A violation of this section is a Class A1 misdemeanor. No employee making a report may be threatened or harassed by any other employee or volunteer on account of the report.

  3. The identity of an individual who makes a report under this section or who cooperates in an ensuing investigation may not be disclosed without the reporting individual’s consent, except to persons authorized by the facility or by State or federal law to investigate or prosecute these incidents, or in a grievance or personnel hearing or civil or criminal action in which the reporting individual is testifying, or when disclosure is legally compelled or authorized by judicial discovery. This subsection shall not be interpreted to require the disclosure of the identity of an individual where it is otherwise prohibited by law.
  4. An employee who makes a report in good faith under this section is immune from any civil liability that might otherwise occur for the report. In any case involving liability, making of a report under this section is prima facie evidence that the maker acted in good faith.
  5. The duty imposed by this section is in addition to any duty imposed by G.S. 7B-301 or G.S. 108A-102 .
  6. Except for reports made pursuant to subsection (b1) of this section, the facility shall investigate or provide for the investigation of all reports made under the provisions of this section.
  7. The county department of social services and the district attorney to whom a report is made under subsection (b1) of this section shall investigate or provide for the investigation of each such report.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, ss. 922, 923; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1998-202, s. 13(ee); 2015-36, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2015-36, s. 3, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2015-36, s. 2, applicable to offenses committed on or after December 1, 2015.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2015-36, s. 2, effective December 1, 2015, substituted “client is guilty of a Class A1 misdemeanor” for “client or borrows or takes personal property from a client is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor” in the first sentence of subsection (a); added subsections (a1), (b1), and (g); in subsection (b), inserted “or a volunteer at” and “subsection (a1)” in the first sentence, and substituted “Class 1 misdemeanor” for “Class 3 misdemeanor punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00)” in the last sentence; made minor stylistic changes in subsection (c); and added the exception at the beginning of subsection (f). For applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Cause of Action Under Section. —

While this section requires reporting of known or suspected abuse of patients in facilities subject to the licensing requirements of this Chapter, such as the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center, the language of this provision does not create a cause of action for retaliatory discharge against an employer by an employee discharged in retaliation for reporting suspected patient abuse. Lenzer v. Flaherty, 106 N.C. App. 496, 418 S.E.2d 276, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 559 , writ denied, 332 N.C. 345 , 421 S.E.2d 348, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 526 (1992).

Discharge resulting from a report made pursuant to this section would give rise to a cause of action for wrongful discharge under the public policy exception to the at-will doctrine. Lenzer v. Flaherty, 106 N.C. App. 496, 418 S.E.2d 276, 1992 N.C. App. LEXIS 559 , writ denied, 332 N.C. 345 , 421 S.E.2d 348, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 526 (1992).

§ 122C-67. Other rules regarding abuse, exploitation, neglect not prohibited.

G.S. 122C-66 does not prohibit the Commission from adopting rules for State and area facilities and does not prohibit other facilities from issuing policies regarding other forms of prohibited abuse, exploitation, or neglect.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-68 through 122C-70.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2. Advance Instruction for Mental Health Treatment.

§ 122C-71. Purpose.

  1. The General Assembly recognizes as a matter of public policy the fundamental right of an individual to control the decisions relating to the individual’s mental health care.
  2. The purpose of this Part is to establish an additional, nonexclusive method for an individual to exercise the right to consent to or refuse mental health treatment when the individual lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate mental health treatment decisions.
  3. This Part is intended and shall be construed to be consistent with the provisions of Article 3 of Chapter 32A of the General Statutes, provided that in the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Part and Article 3 of Chapter 32A, the provisions of this Part control.

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2.

Legal Periodicals.

See legislative survey, 21 Campbell L. Rev. 323 (1999).

For note, “Double Secret Protection: Bridging Federal and State Law to Protect Privacy Rights for Telemental and Mobile Health Users,” see 67 Duke L.J. 1115 (2018).

§ 122C-72. Definitions.

As used in this Part, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following terms have the meanings specified:

  1. “Advance instruction for mental health treatment” or “advance instruction” means a written instrument, signed in the presence of two qualified witnesses who believe the principal to be of sound mind at the time of the signing, and acknowledged before a notary public, pursuant to which the principal makes a declaration of instructions, information, and preferences regarding the principal’s mental health treatment and states that the principal is aware that the advance instruction authorizes a mental health treatment provider to act according to the instruction. It may also state the principal’s instructions regarding, but not limited to, consent to or refusal of mental health treatment when the principal is incapable.
  2. “Attending physician” means the physician who has primary responsibility for the care and treatment of the principal.
  3. Repealed by Session Laws 1998-198, s. 2, effective October 1, 1998.
  4. “Incapable” means that, in the opinion of a physician or eligible psychologist, the person currently lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make and communicate mental health treatment decisions. As used in this Part, the term “eligible psychologist” has the meaning given in G.S. 122C-3(13d).
  5. “Mental health treatment” means the process of providing for the physical, emotional, psychological, and social needs of the principal for the principal’s mental illness. “Mental health treatment” includes, but is not limited to, electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), commonly referred to as “shock treatment”, treatment of mental illness with psychotropic medication, and admission to and retention in a facility for care or treatment of mental illness.
  6. “Principal” means the person making the advance instruction.
  7. “Qualified witness” means a witness who affirms that the principal is personally known to the witness, that the principal signed or acknowledged the principal’s signature on the advance instruction in the presence of the witness, that the witness believes the principal to be of sound mind and not to be under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and that the witness is not:
    1. The attending physician or mental health service provider or an employee of the physician or mental health treatment provider;
    2. An owner, operator, or employee of an owner or operator of a health care facility in which the principal is a patient or resident; or
    3. Related within the third degree to the principal or to the principal’s spouse.

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2.

§ 122C-73. Scope, use, and authority of advance instruction for mental health treatment.

  1. Any adult of sound mind may make an advance instruction regarding mental health treatment. The advance instruction may include consent to or refusal of mental health treatment.
  2. An advance instruction may include, but is not limited to, the names and telephone numbers of individuals to be contacted in case of a mental health crisis, situations that may cause the principal to experience a mental health crisis, responses that may assist the principal to remain in the principal’s home during a mental health crisis, the types of assistance that may help stabilize the principal if it becomes necessary to enter a facility, and medications that the principal is taking or has taken in the past and the effects of those medications.
  3. An individual shall not be required to execute or to refrain from executing an advance instruction as a condition for insurance coverage, as a condition for receiving mental or physical health services, as a condition for receiving privileges while in a facility, or as a condition of discharge from a facility.

    (c1) A principal, through an advance instruction, may grant or withhold authority for mental health treatment, including, but not limited to, the use of psychotropic medication, electroconvulsive treatment, and admission to and retention in a facility for the care or treatment of mental illness.

  4. A principal may nominate, by advance instruction for mental health treatment, the guardian of the person of the principal if a guardianship proceeding is thereafter commenced. The court shall make its appointment in accordance with the principal’s most recent nomination in an unrevoked advance instruction for mental health treatment, except for good cause shown.
  5. If, following the execution of an advance instruction for mental health treatment, a court of competent jurisdiction appoints a guardian of the person of the principal, or a general guardian with powers over the person of the principal, the guardian shall follow the advance instruction consistent with G.S. 35A-1201(a)(5).
  6. An advance instruction for mental health treatment may be combined with a health care power of attorney or general power of attorney that is executed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 32A or Chapter 32C of the General Statutes so long as each form shall be executed in accordance with its own statute.

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2; 2017-153, s. 2.7.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-153, s. 2.7, effective January 1, 2018, inserted “or Chapter 32C” in subsection (f).

§ 122C-74. Effectiveness and duration; revocation.

  1. A validly executed advance instruction becomes effective upon its proper execution and remains valid unless revoked.
  2. The attending physician or other mental health treatment provider may consider valid and rely upon an advance instruction, or a copy of that advance instruction that is obtained from the Advance Health Care Directive Registry maintained by the Secretary of State pursuant to Article 21 of Chapter 130A of the General Statutes, in the absence of actual knowledge of its revocation or invalidity.
  3. An attending physician or other mental health treatment provider may presume that a person who executed an advance instruction in accordance with this Part was of sound mind and acted voluntarily when he or she executed the advance instruction.
  4. An attending physician or other mental health treatment provider shall act in accordance with an advance instruction when the principal has been determined to be incapable. If a patient is incapable, an advance instruction executed in accordance with this Article is presumed to be valid.
  5. The attending physician or mental health treatment provider shall continue to obtain the principal’s informed consent to all mental health treatment decisions when the principal is capable of providing informed consent or refusal, as required by G.S. 122C-57 . Unless the principal is deemed incapable by the attending physician or eligible psychologist, the instructions of the principal at the time of treatment shall supersede the declarations expressed in the principal’s advance instruction.
  6. The fact of a principal’s having executed an advance instruction shall not be considered an indication of a principal’s capacity to make or communicate mental health treatment decisions at such times as those decisions are required.
  7. Upon being presented with an advance instruction, an attending physician or other mental health treatment provider shall make the advance instruction a part of the principal’s medical record. When acting under authority of an advance instruction, an attending physician or other mental health treatment provider shall comply with the advance instruction unless:
    1. Compliance, in the opinion of the attending physician or other mental health treatment provider, is not consistent with generally accepted community practice standards of treatment to benefit the principal;
    2. Compliance is not consistent with the availability of treatments requested;
    3. Compliance is not consistent with applicable law;
    4. The principal is committed to a 24-hour facility pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, and treatment is authorized in compliance with G.S. 122C-57 and rules adopted pursuant to it; or
    5. Compliance, in the opinion of the attending physician or other mental health treatment provider, is not consistent with appropriate treatment in case of an emergency endangering life or health. In the event that one part of the advance instruction is unable to be followed because of one or more of the above, all other parts of the advance instruction shall nonetheless be followed.
  8. If the attending physician or other mental health treatment provider is unwilling at any time to comply with any part or parts of an advance instruction for one or more of the reasons set out in subdivisions (1) through (5) of subsection (g), the attending physician or other mental health care treatment provider shall promptly notify the principal and, if applicable, the health care agent and shall document the reason for not complying with the advance instruction and shall document the notification in the principal’s medical record.
  9. An advance instruction does not limit any authority provided in Article 5 of G.S. 122C either to take a person into custody, or to admit, retain, or treat a person in a facility.
  10. An advance instruction may be revoked at any time by the principal so long as the principal is not incapable. The principal may exercise this right of revocation in any manner by which the principal is able to communicate an intent to revoke and by notifying the revocation to the treating physician or other mental health treatment provider. The attending physician or other mental health treatment provider shall note the revocation as part of the principal’s medical record.

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2; 2001-455, s. 5; 2001-513, s. 30(b).

§ 122C-75. Reliance on advance instruction for mental health treatment.

  1. An attending physician or eligible psychologist who in good faith determines that the principal is or is not incapable for the purpose of deciding whether to proceed or not to proceed according to an advance instruction, is not subject to criminal prosecution, civil liability, or professional disciplinary action for making and acting upon that determination.
  2. In the absence of actual knowledge of the revocation of an advance instruction, no attending physician or other mental health treatment provider shall be subject to criminal prosecution or civil liability or be deemed to have engaged in unprofessional conduct as a result of the provision of treatment to a principal in accordance with this Part unless the absence of actual knowledge resulted from the negligence of the attending physician or mental health treatment provider.
  3. An attending physician or mental health treatment provider who administers or does not administer mental health treatment according to and in good faith reliance upon the validity of an advance instruction is not subject to criminal prosecution, civil liability, or professional disciplinary action resulting from a subsequent finding of an advance instruction’s invalidity.
  4. No attending physician or mental health treatment provider who administers or does not administer treatment under authorization obtained pursuant to this Part shall incur liability arising out of a claim to the extent that the claim is based on lack of informed consent or authorization for this action.
  5. This section shall not be construed as affecting or limiting any liability that arises out of a negligent act or omission in connection with the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a principal under an advance instruction or that arises out of any deviation from reasonable medical standards.

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2.

§ 122C-76. Penalty.

It is a Class 2 misdemeanor for a person, without authorization of the principal, willfully to alter, forge, conceal, or destroy an instrument, the reinstatement or revocation of an instrument, or any other evidence or document reflecting the principal’s desires and interests, with the intent or effect of affecting a mental health treatment decision.

History. 1997-442, s. 2.

§ 122C-77. Statutory form for advance instruction for mental health treatment.

  1. This Part shall not be construed to invalidate an advance instruction for mental health treatment that was executed and was otherwise valid.
  2. The use of the following or similar form after the effective date of this Part in the creation of an advance instruction for mental health treatment is lawful, and, when used, it shall specifically meet the requirements and be construed in accordance with the provisions of this Part.

    Click to view

“ADVANCE INSTRUCTION FOR MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT I, , being an adult of sound mind, willfully and voluntarily make this advance instruction for mental health treatment to be followed if it is determined by a physician or eligible psychologist that my ability to receive and evaluate information effectively or communicate decisions is impaired to such an extent that I lack the capacity to refuse or consent to mental health treatment. “Mental health treatment” means the process of providing for the physical, emotional, psychological, and social needs of the principal. “Mental health treatment” includes electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), commonly referred to as “shock treatment”, treatment of mental illness with psychotropic medication, and admission to and retention in a facility for care or treatment of mental illness. I understand that under , other than for specific exceptions stated there, mental health treatment may not be administered without my express and informed written consent or, if I am incapable of giving my informed consent, the express and informed consent of my legally responsible person, my health care agent named pursuant to a valid health care power of attorney, or my consent expressed in this advance instruction for mental health treatment. I understand that I may become incapable of giving or withholding informed consent for mental health treatment due to the symptoms of a diagnosed mental disorder. These symptoms may include: G.S. 122C-57 PSYCHOACTIVE MEDICATIONS If I become incapable of giving or withholding informed consent for mental health treatment, my instructions regarding psychoactive medications are as follows: (Place initials beside choice.) I consent to the administration of the following medications: I do not consent to the administration of the following medications: Conditions or limitations: ADMISSION TO AND RETENTION IN FACILITY If I become incapable of giving or withholding informed consent for mental health treatment, my instructions regarding admission to and retention in a health care facility for mental health treatment are as follows: (Place initials beside choice.) I consent to being admitted to a health care facility for mental health treatment. My facility preference is I do not consent to being admitted to a health care facility for mental health treatment. This advance instruction cannot, by law, provide consent to retain me in a facility for more than 15 days. Conditions or limitation ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS These instructions shall apply during the entire length of my incapacity. In case of mental health crisis, please contact: 1. Name: Home Address: Home Telephone Number: Work Telephone Number: Relationship to Me: 2. Name: Home Address: Home Telephone Number: Work Telephone Number: Relationship to Me: 3. My Physician: Name: Telephone Number: 4 My Therapist: . Name: Telephone Number: The following may cause me to experience a mental health crisis: The following may help me avoid a hospitalization: I generally react to being hospitalized as follows: Staff of the hospital or crisis unit can help me by doing the following: I give permission for the following person or people to visit me: Instructions concerning any other medical interventions, such as electroconvulsive (ECT) treatment (commonly referred to as “shock treatment”): Other instructions: I have attached an additional sheet of instructions to be followed SHARING OF INFORMATION BY PROVIDERS I understand that the information in this document may be shared by my mental health treatment provider with any other mental health treatment provider who may serve me when necessary to provide treatment in accor- dance with this advance instruction. Other instructions about sharing of information: SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL By signing here, I indicate that I am mentally alert and competent, fully informed as to the contents of this document, and understand the full impact of having made this advance instruction for mental health treatment. Signature of Principal Date NATURE OF WITNESSES I hereby state that the principal is personally known to me, that the principal signed or acknowledged the principal’s signature on this advance instruction for mental health treatment in my presence, that the principal appears to be of sound mind and not under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and that I am not: a. The attending physician or mental health service provider or an employee of the physician or mental health treatment provider; b. An owner, operator, or employee of an owner or operator of a health care facility in which the principal is a patient or resident; or c. Related within the third degree to the principal or to the principal’s spouse. AFFIRMATION OF WITNESSES We affirm that the principal is personally known to us, that the principal signed or acknowledged the principal’s signature on this advance instruction for mental health treatment in our presence, that the principal appears to be of sound mind and not under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and that neither of us is: A person appointed as an attorney-in-fact by this document; The principal’s attending physician or mental health service provider or a relative of the physician or provider; The owner, operator, or relative of an owner or operator of a facility in which the principal is a patient or resident; or A person related to the principal by blood, marriage, or adoption. Witnessed by: Witness: Date: Witness: Date: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CERTIFICATION OF NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, , a Notary Public for the County cited above in the State of North Carolina, hereby certify that appeared before me and swore or affirmed to me and to the witnesses in my presence that this instrument is an advance instruction for mental health treatment, and that he/she willingly and voluntarily made and executed it as his/her free act and deed for the purposes expressed in it. I further certify that and , witnesses, appeared before me and swore or affirmed that they witnessed sign the attached advance instruction for mental health treatment, believing him/her to be of sound mind; and also swore that at the time they witnessed the signing they were not (i) the attending physician or mental health treatment provider or an employee of the physician or mental health treatment provider and (ii) they were not an owner, operator, or employee of an owner or operator of a health care facility in which the principal is a patient or resident, and (iii) they were not related within the third degree to the principal or to the principal’s spouse. I further certify that I am satisfied as to the genuineness and due execution of the instrument. This is the day of , Notary Public My Commission expires: NOTICE TO PERSON MAKING AN INSTRUCTION FOR MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT This is an important legal document. It creates an instruction for mental health treatment. Before signing this document you should know these important facts: This document allows you to make decisions in advance about certain types of mental health treatment. The instructions you include in this declaration will be followed if a physician or eligible psychologist determines that you are incapable of making and communicating treatment decisions. Otherwise you will be considered capable to give or withhold consent for the treatments. Your instructions may be overridden if you are being held in accordance with civil commitment law. Under the Health Care Power of Attorney you may also appoint a person as your health care agent to make treatment decisions for you if you become incapable. You have the right to revoke this document at any time you have not been determined to be incapable. YOU MAY NOT REVOKE THIS ADVANCE INSTRUCTION WHEN YOU ARE FOUND INCAPABLE BY A PHYSICIAN OR OTHER AUTHORIZED MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT PROVIDER. A revocation is effective when it is communicated to your attending physician or other provider. The physician or other provider shall note the revocation in your medical record. To be valid, this advance instruction must be signed by two qualified witnesses, personally known to you, who are present when you sign or acknowledge your signature. It must also be acknowledged before a notary public. NOTICE TO PHYSICIAN OR OTHER MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT PROVIDER Under North Carolina law, a person may use this advance instruction to provide consent for future mental health treatment if the person later becomes incapable of making those decisions. Under the Health Care Power of Attorney the person may also appoint a health care agent to make mental health treatment decisions for the person when incapable. A person is “incapable” when in the opinion of a physician or eligible psychologist the person currently lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make and communicate mental health treatment decisions. This document becomes effective upon its proper execution and remains valid unless revoked. Upon being presented with this advance instruction, the physician or other provider must make it a part of the person’s medical record. The attending physician or other mental health treatment provider must act in accordance with the statements expressed in the advance instruction when the person is determined to be incapable, unless compliance is not consistent with . The physician or other mental health treatment provider shall promptly notify the principal and, if applicable, the health care agent, and document noncompliance with any part of an advance instruction in the principal’s medical record. The physician or other mental health treatment provider may rely upon the authority of a signed, witnessed, dated, and notarized advance instruction, as provided in G.S. 122C-74(g) G.S. 122C-75

History. 1997-442, s. 2; 1998-198, s. 2; 1998-217, s. 53(a)(5); 2019-240, s. 26(d).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1998-217, s. 53(a)(5), provides: “The Revisor of Statutes may delete from G.S. 122C-77 , as rewritten by Section 2 of that act, any lines on the form to be filled in where it was clearly intended that those lines be deleted but which do not appear to be stricken through because of formatting.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(d), effective November 6, 2019, deleted “prior to January 1, 1999” following “was executed” in subsection (a); and substituted “for more than 15 days” for “for more than 10 days” in the “ADMISSION TO AND RETENTION IN FACILITY” provisions of the form in subsection (b).

§§ 122C-78, 122C-79.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 3A. Miscellaneous Provisions.

§ 122C-80. Criminal history record check required for certain applicants for employment.

  1. Definition. —  As used in this section, the term “provider” applies to an area authority/county program and any provider of mental health, developmental disability, and substance abuse services that is licensable under Article 2 of this Chapter.
  2. Requirement. —  An offer of employment by a provider licensed under this Chapter to an applicant to fill a position that does not require the applicant to have an occupational license is conditioned on consent to a State and national criminal history record check of the applicant. If the applicant has been a resident of this State for less than five years, then the offer of employment is conditioned on consent to a State and national criminal history record check of the applicant. The national criminal history record check shall include a check of the applicant’s fingerprints. If the applicant has been a resident of this State for five years or more, then the offer is conditioned on consent to a State criminal history record check of the applicant. A provider shall not employ an applicant who refuses to consent to a criminal history record check required by this section. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, within five business days of making the conditional offer of employment, a provider shall submit a request to the Department of Public Safety under G.S. 143B-939 to conduct a criminal history record check required by this section or shall submit a request to a private entity to conduct a State criminal history record check required by this section. Notwithstanding G.S. 143B-939 , the Department of Public Safety shall return the results of national criminal history record checks for employment positions not covered by Public Law 105-277 to the Department of Health and Human Services, Criminal Records Check Unit. Within five business days of receipt of the national criminal history of the person, the Department of Health and Human Services, Criminal Records Check Unit, shall notify the provider as to whether the information received may affect the employability of the applicant. In no case shall the results of the national criminal history record check be shared with the provider. Providers shall make available upon request verification that a criminal history check has been completed on any staff covered by this section. A county that has adopted an appropriate local ordinance and has access to the Department of Public Safety data bank may conduct on behalf of a provider a State criminal history record check required by this section without the provider having to submit a request to the Department of Justice. In such a case, the county shall commence with the State criminal history record check required by this section within five business days of the conditional offer of employment by the provider. All criminal history information received by the provider is confidential and may not be disclosed, except to the applicant as provided in subsection (c) of this section. For purposes of this subsection, the term “private entity” means a business regularly engaged in conducting criminal history record checks utilizing public records obtained from a State agency.
  3. Action. —  If an applicant’s criminal history record check reveals one or more convictions of a relevant offense, the provider shall consider all of the following factors in determining whether to hire the applicant:
    1. The level and seriousness of the crime.
    2. The date of the crime.
    3. The age of the person at the time of the conviction.
    4. The circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime, if known.
    5. The nexus between the criminal conduct of the person and the job duties of the position to be filled.
    6. The prison, jail, probation, parole, rehabilitation, and employment records of the person since the date the crime was committed.
    7. The subsequent commission by the person of a relevant offense.

      The fact of conviction of a relevant offense alone shall not be a bar to employment; however, the listed factors shall be considered by the provider. If the provider disqualifies an applicant after consideration of the relevant factors, then the provider may disclose information contained in the criminal history record check that is relevant to the disqualification, but may not provide a copy of the criminal history record check to the applicant.

  4. Limited Immunity. —  A provider and an officer or employee of a provider that, in good faith, complies with this section shall be immune from civil liability for:
    1. The failure of the provider to employ an individual on the basis of information provided in the criminal history record check of the individual.
    2. Failure to check an employee’s history of criminal offenses if the employee’s criminal history record check is requested and received in compliance with this section.
  5. Relevant Offense. —  As used in this section, “relevant offense” means a county, state, or federal criminal history of conviction or pending indictment of a crime, whether a misdemeanor or felony, that bears upon an individual’s fitness to have responsibility for the safety and well-being of persons needing mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse services. These crimes include the criminal offenses set forth in any of the following Articles of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes: Article 5, Counterfeiting and Issuing Monetary Substitutes; Article 5A, Endangering Executive and Legislative Officers; Article 6, Homicide; Article 7B, Rape and Other Sex Offenses; Article 8, Assaults; Article 10, Kidnapping and Abduction; Article 13, Malicious Injury or Damage by Use of Explosive or Incendiary Device or Material; Article 14, Burglary and Other Housebreakings; Article 15, Arson and Other Burnings; Article 16, Larceny; Article 17, Robbery; Article 18, Embezzlement; Article 19, False Pretenses and Cheats; Article 19A, Obtaining Property or Services by False or Fraudulent Use of Credit Device or Other Means; Article 19B, Financial Transaction Card Crime Act; Article 20, Frauds; Article 21, Forgery; Article 26, Offenses Against Public Morality and Decency; Article 26A, Adult Establishments; Article 27, Prostitution; Article 28, Perjury; Article 29, Bribery; Article 31, Misconduct in Public Office; Article 35, Offenses Against the Public Peace; Article 36A, Riots, Civil Disorders, and Emergencies; Article 39, Protection of Minors; Article 40, Protection of the Family; Article 59, Public Intoxication; and Article 60, Computer-Related Crime. These crimes also include possession or sale of drugs in violation of the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act, Article 5 of Chapter 90 of the General Statutes, and alcohol-related offenses such as sale to underage persons in violation of G.S. 18B-302 or driving while impaired in violation of G.S. 20-138.1 through G.S. 20-138.5 .
  6. Penalty for Furnishing False Information. —  Any applicant for employment who willfully furnishes, supplies, or otherwise gives false information on an employment application that is the basis for a criminal history record check under this section shall be guilty of a Class A1 misdemeanor.
  7. Conditional Employment. —  A provider may employ an applicant conditionally prior to obtaining the results of a criminal history record check regarding the applicant if both of the following requirements are met:
    1. The provider shall not employ an applicant prior to obtaining the applicant’s consent for criminal history record check as required in subsection (b) of this section or the completed fingerprint cards as required in G.S. 143B-939 .
    2. The provider shall submit the request for a criminal history record check not later than five business days after the individual begins conditional employment.

History. 2000-154, s. 4; 2001-155, s. 1; 2004-124, ss. 10.19D(c), (h); 2005-4, ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(a); 2007-444, s. 3; 2012-12, s. 2(tt); 2014-100, s. 17.1(q), (ddd); 2015-181, s. 47.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-4, ss. 1-5(a), effective March 23, 2005, rewrote subsection (a); in subsection (b), substituted “Criminal Records Check Unit” for “Division of Facility Services” at the end of the seventh sentence and in the eighth sentence, and “notify the provider as to whether the information received may affect the employability of the applicant. In no case shall the results of the national criminal history record check be shared with the provider” for “shall provide to the area authority the results of the national criminal history check” at the end of the eighth sentence, inserted the present ninth sentence, and substituted “Providers” for “Area authorities” at the beginning of the present tenth sentence; substituted “a provider” for “an area authority” throughout the section; and substituted “provider” for “area authority” throughout subection (c), in subdivision (d)(1), and in subdivisions (g)(1) and (g)(2).

Session Laws 2007-444, s. 3, effective August 23, 2007, in subsection (b), added “or shall submit a request to a private entity to conduct a State criminal history record check required by this section” in the sixth sentence, and added the last sentence.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(q) and (ddd), effective July 1, 2014, in subsection (b), substituted “Department of Public Safety” for “Department of Justice” and “G.S. 143B-939” for “G.S. 114-19.10” in the sixth and seventh sentences and substituted “Department of Public Safety” for “Division of Criminal Information” in the eleventh sentence; and substituted “G.S. 143B-939” for “G.S. 114-19.10” in subdivision (g)(1).

§ 122C-81. National accreditation benchmarks.

  1. As used in this section, the term:
    1. “National accreditation” applies to accreditation by an entity approved by the Secretary that accredits mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    2. “Provider” applies to only those providers of services, including facilities, requiring national accreditation, which services are designated by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.
  2. The Secretary, through the Medicaid State Plan, Medicaid waiver, or rules adopted by the Secretary, shall designate the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services that require national accreditation. In accordance with rules of the Commission, the Secretary may exempt a provider that is accredited under this section and in good standing with the national accrediting agency from undergoing any routine monitoring that is duplicative of the oversight by the national accrediting agency.
  3. Providers enrolled with the Medicaid program prior to July 1, 2008, and providing services that require national accreditation approved by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, shall successfully complete national accreditation requirements within three years of enrollment with the Medicaid program. Providers shall meet the following benchmarks to ensure continuity of care for consumers in the event the provider does not make sufficient progress in achieving national accreditation in a timely manner:
    1. Nine months prior to the accreditation deadline —  Formal selection of an accrediting agency as documented by a letter from the agency to the provider acknowledging the provider’s selection of that accrediting agency. A provider failing to meet this benchmark shall be prohibited from admitting new clients to service. If a provider fails to meet this benchmark, then the LMEs shall work with the provider to transfer all the provider’s entire case load to another provider within four months of the date of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark. The transfer of the case load shall be in increments such that not fewer than twenty-five percent (25%) of the provider’s total caseload shall be transferred per month. The Department shall terminate the provider’s enrollment in the Medicaid program within four months of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark.
    2. Six months prior to the accreditation deadline —  An on-site accreditation review scheduled by the accrediting agency as documented by a letter from the agency to the facility. A provider failing to meet this benchmark will be prohibited from admitting new clients to service. If a provider fails to meet this benchmark, then the LMEs shall work with the provider to transfer the provider’s entire case load to another provider within three months of the date of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark. The transfer of the case load shall be in increments such that not fewer than thirty-three percent (33%) of the provider’s total caseload shall be transferred per month. The Department shall terminate the provider’s enrollment in the Medicaid program within three months of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark.
    3. Three months prior to the accreditation deadline —  Completion of an on-site accreditation review, receipt of initial feedback from accrediting agency, and submission of a Plan of Correction for any deficiencies noted by the accrediting agency. A provider failing to meet this benchmark shall be prohibited from admitting new clients to service. If a provider fails to meet this benchmark, then the LMEs shall work with the provider to transfer the provider’s entire case load to another provider within two months of the date of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark. The transfer of the case load shall be in increments such that not fewer than fifty percent (50%) of the provider’s total caseload shall be transferred per month. The Department shall terminate the provider’s enrollment in the Medicaid program within two months of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark.
    4. Accreditation deadline —  Approval as fully accredited by the national accrediting agency. A provider failing to meet this requirement shall be prohibited from admitting new clients to service. The LMEs will work with a provider failing to meet this deadline to transition clients currently receiving service to other providers within 60 days. The Department shall terminate the provider’s enrollment in the Medicaid program within 60 days of the provider’s failure to meet the benchmark.
    5. A provider that has its enrollment terminated in the Medicaid program as a result of failure to meet benchmarks for national accreditation or failure to continue to be nationally accredited may not apply for re-enrollment in the Medicaid program for at least one year following its enrollment termination.
  4. Providers enrolled in the Medicaid program or contracting for State-funded services on or after July 1, 2008, and providing services which require national accreditation shall successfully complete all accreditation requirements and be awarded national accreditation within one year of enrollment in the Medicaid program or within two years following the provider’s first contract to deliver a State-funded service requiring national accreditation. Providers providing services that require national accreditation shall be required to discontinue service delivery and shall have their Medicaid enrollment and any service contracts terminated if they do not meet the following benchmarks for demonstrating sufficient progress in achieving national accreditation following the date of enrollment in the Medicaid program or initial contract for State-funded services:
    1. Three months —  On-site accreditation review scheduled by accrediting agency as documented by a letter from the agency to the provider and completion of self-study and self-evaluation protocols distributed by the selected accrediting agency.
    2. Six months —  On-site accreditation review scheduled by accrediting agency as documented by a letter from the agency to the provider.
    3. Nine months —  Completion of on-site accreditation review, receipt of initial feedback from accrediting agency, plan to address any deficiencies identified developed.
    4. If a provider’s Medicaid enrollment or service delivery contracts are terminated as a result of failure to meet accreditation benchmarks or failure to continue to be nationally accredited, the provider will work with the LME to transition consumers served by the provider to other service providers in an orderly fashion within 60 days of notification by the LME of such failure.
    5. A provider that has its Medicaid enrollment or service delivery contracts terminated as a result of failure to meet accreditation benchmarks or failure to continue to be nationally accredited may not reapply for enrollment in the Medicaid program or enter into any new service delivery contracts for at least one year following enrollment or contract termination.
  5. The Commission may adopt rules establishing a procedure by which a provider that is accredited under this section and in good standing with the national accrediting agency may be exempt from undergoing any routine monitoring that is duplicative of the oversight by the national accrediting agency. Any provider shall continue to be subject to inspection by the Secretary, provided the inspection is not duplicative of inspections required by the national accrediting agency. Rules adopted under this subsection may not waive any requirements that may be imposed under federal law.

History. 2008-107, s. 10.15A(c); 2015-286, s. 3.7.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2015-286, s. 3.7, effective October 22, 2015, added the last sentence of subsection (b); and added subsection (e).

Article 4. Organization and System for Delivery of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.

Part 1. Policy.

§ 122C-101. Policy.

Within the public system of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, there are area, county, and State facilities. An area authority or county program is the locus of coordination among public services for clients of its catchment area.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 13; 1993, c. 396, s. 3; 2001-437, s. 1.4.

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.5A, provides: “It is the intent of the General Assembly to reduce avoidable emergency department readmissions and emergency department boarding times among individuals with behavioral health needs. To that end, of the funds appropriated to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the sum of two million dollars ($2,000,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2017-2018 fiscal year shall be allocated for the development and establishment of a two-year pilot program at a hospital in Wake County to support a hospital-based, comprehensive community case management program. The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, in consultation with LME/MCOs responsible for the management and provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorder services in Wake County under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, shall oversee the development and establishment of the pilot program to ensure it is designed to reduce avoidable emergency department readmissions and emergency department boarding times among individuals with behavioral health needs. The pilot program shall be conducted at the hospital in Wake County with the largest number of emergency department visits that agrees to participate in the two-year pilot program authorized by this subsection.

“By December 1, 2020, the Department shall submit a report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division evaluating the effectiveness of the pilot program in reducing avoidable emergency department readmissions and emergency department boarding times among individuals with behavioral health needs.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

§ 122C-102. State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services; system performance measures.

  1. Purpose of State Plan. —  The Department shall develop and implement a State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. The purpose of the State Plan is to provide a strategic template regarding how State and local resources shall be organized and used to provide services. The State Plan shall be issued every three years beginning July 1, 2007. It shall identify specific goals to be achieved by the Department, area authorities, and county programs over a three-year period of time and benchmarks for determining whether progress is being made towards those goals. It shall also identify data that will be used to measure progress towards the specified goals. In order to increase the ability of the State, area authorities, county programs, private providers, and consumers to successfully implement the goals of the State Plan, the Department shall not adopt or implement policies that are inconsistent with the State Plan without first consulting with the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.
  2. Content of State Plan. —  The State Plan shall include the following:
    1. Vision and mission of the State Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services system.
    2. Repealed by Session Laws 2006-142, s. 2(a), effective July 19, 2006.
    3. Protection of client rights and consumer involvement in planning and management of system services.
    4. Provision of services to targeted populations, including criteria for identifying targeted populations.
    5. Compliance with federal mandates in establishing service priorities in mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
    6. Description of the core services that are available to all individuals in order to improve consumer access to mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services at the local level.
    7. Service standards for the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system.
    8. Implementation of the uniform portal process.
    9. Strategies and schedules for implementing the service plan, including consultation on Medicaid policy with area and county programs, qualified providers, and others as designated by the Secretary, intersystem collaboration, promotion of best practices, technical assistance, outcome-based monitoring, and evaluation.
    10. A plan for coordination of the State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services with the Medicaid State Plan, and NC Health Choice.
    11. A business plan to demonstrate efficient and effective resource management of the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system, including strategies for accountability for non-Medicaid and Medicaid services.
    12. Strategies and schedules for implementing a phased in plan to eliminate disparities in the allocation of State funding across county programs and area authorities by January 1, 2007, including methods to identify service gaps and to ensure equitable use of State funds to fill those gaps among all counties.
  3. Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12A.8(c), effective July 1, 2013.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.5; 2006-142, s. 2(a); 2011-291, s. 2.42; 2013-360, s. 12A.8(c).

Adult Care Home Model for Community-Based Services.

Session Laws 2001-424, s. 21.54(a) and (b) contained similar provisions.

Session Laws 2001-424, s. 21.58(b), provides: “The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall develop a plan, after consultation with advocacy groups and affected State and local agencies and programs concerned with the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services needs of the State, for the use of funds from the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs established under G.S. 143D-15D to meet the mental health needs of the State. The plan shall be consistent with the plan developed pursuant to G.S. 122C-102 , if enacted in House Bill 381 of the 2001 General Assembly. Funds shall not be transferred from the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs until the Secretary has consulted with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Chairs of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services and the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services.”

Session Laws 2001-424, ss. 21.62 (a) to (d), provide: “(a) In keeping with the United States Supreme Court Decision in Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W. and State policy to provide appropriate services to clients in the least restrictive and most appropriate environment, the Department of Health and Human Services shall develop and implement a plan for the transfer of residents of State mental retardation centers, if appropriate, as follows:

“(1) Transfer those residents of the centers that need institutional services to a private intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded.

“(2) Transition to community programs and services those residents of the center that may be appropriately served in the community.

“The Department shall develop a transition plan for moving each resident of the mental retardation center to the community-based services and supports, if appropriate. The transition plan shall be developed in consultation with the resident and the resident’s family or guardian.

“(b) The Department may use funds from the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs to facilitate the transition of residents into alternative community-based services as required under subsection (a) of this section [s. 21.62 (a) of Session Laws 2001-424]. Nonrecurring savings realized from implementation of the plan required under subsection (a) of this section [s. 21.62 (a) of Session Laws 2001-424] shall be deposited to the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs to be used to facilitate the transition of clients into appropriate community-based services and supports in accordance with Section 21.58 of this ac [Session Laws 2001-424]. Recurring savings realized through implementation of this section [s. 21.62 of Session Laws 2001-424] shall be retained by the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (i) for implementation of subsection (a)(1) and (2) of this section [ss. 21.62 (a) (1) and (a) (2) of Session Laws 2001-424], and (ii) to support the recurring costs of additional community-based placements from Division facilities in accordance with Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W.

“(c) On or before January 1, 2002, and again on or before May 1, 2002, and May 1, 2003, the Department shall report to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division on its progress in implementing this section [s. 21.62 of Session Laws 2001-424].

“(d) Before closing one or more State mental retardation centers the Department shall report the closure to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations.”

Session Laws 2003-284, ss. 10.15(a) through (c), provide: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services shall develop and implement a plan for the reorganization of outreach services performed by the State mental retardation centers. The plan shall provide for the elimination of self-referrals by the mental retardation centers and shall include the following:

“(1) The area and county mental health programs shall have exclusive authority for referring to the mental retardation centers persons in the community who are in need of specialized services.

“(2) The mental retardation centers shall coordinate the transition of residents from the mental retardation centers to area and county mental health programs, and shall provide technical assistance to community service providers and families who care for transitioned residents, and to others in the community, as appropriate, for the purpose of furthering community services and placement.

“(3) The method for allocating savings in State appropriations from the mental retardation centers across the area and county mental health programs.

“(b) In accordance with the plan established in subsection (a) of this section, any recurring and nonrecurring savings in State appropriations that result from the transfer of referral activities in the mental retardation centers to area and county mental health programs shall be transferred from the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services to area and county mental health programs for referral activities.

“(c) The Department of Health and Human Services shall report on the implementation of this section to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division. This report shall be submitted on February 1, 2004.”

Session Laws 2003-284, ss. 10.12(a) through (d), effective July 1, 2003, provide: “(a) In keeping with the United States Supreme Court decision in Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W. and State policy to provide appropriate services to clients in the least restrictive and most appropriate environment, the Department of Health and Human Services shall develop and implement a plan for the construction of a replacement facility for Dorothea Dix Hospital and for the transition of patients to the community or to other long-term care facilities, as appropriate. The goal is to develop mechanisms and identify resources needed to enable patients and their families to receive the necessary services and supports based on the following guiding principles:

“(1) Individuals shall be provided acute psychiatric care in non-State facilities when appropriate.

“(2) Individuals shall be provided acute psychiatric care in State facilities only when non-State facilities are unavailable.

“(3) Individuals shall receive evidenced-based psychiatric services and care that are cost-efficient.

“(4) The State shall minimize cost shifting to other State and local facilities or institutions.

“(b) The Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct an analysis of the individual patient service needs and shall develop and implement an individual transition plan, as appropriate, for patients in each hospital. The State shall ensure that each individual transition plan, as appropriate, shall take into consideration the availability of appropriate alternative placements based on the needs of the patient and within resources available for the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system. In developing each plan, the Department shall consult with the patient and the patient’s family or other legal representative.

“(c) In accordance with the plan established in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, any nonrecurring savings in State appropriations that result from reductions in beds or services shall be placed in the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs. These funds shall be used to facilitate the transition of clients into appropriate community-based services and supports in accordance with G.S. 143-15.3D. Recurring savings realized through implementation of this section shall be retained by the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, (i) for implementation of subsections (a) and (b) of this section and (ii) to support the recurring costs of additional community-based placements from Division facilities in accordance with Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W.

“(d) The Department of Health and Human Services shall submit reports on the status of implementation of this section to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division. These reports shall be submitted on December 1, 2003, and May 1, 2004.”

For similar prior provisions see S.L. 2001-424, ss. 21.63(a) to (e).

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 10.12, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of State Operated Facilities, shall issue a Request for Proposal for the consolidation of forensic hospital care. The operation shall initially be located at the Dorothea Dix complex. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to proceed with contracting with a private entity if the Secretary can justify savings through the contract. The Secretary shall compare the Department’s total cost to provide forensic care to proposals received and determine whether it is cost-effective to contract for this service. The Secretary may only proceed if the Secretary determines the Department will save money and ensure appropriate safety and quality of care for patients.

“The Secretary shall report to the Joint Appropriations Subcommittee for Health and Human Services by October 30, 2011, with cost detail and savings identified from the proposals.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.13(a), provides: “Effective July 1, 2000, the county share of the cost of Medicaid services currently and previously provided by area mental health authorities shall be increased incrementally each fiscal year until the county share reaches fifteen percent (15%) of the nonfederal share by State fiscal year 2009-2010.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.13(b), provides: “Effective July 1, 2000, the county share of the cost of Medicaid Personal Care Services paid to adult care homes shall be decreased incrementally each fiscal year until the county share reaches fifteen percent (15%) of the nonfederal share by State fiscal year 2009-2010.”

For similar prior provisions see Session Laws 2003-284, §§ 10.22(a) and (b).

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.24(a)-(c), provides: “The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services shall, in consultation with interested advocacy groups and affected State and local agencies, develop a long-range plan for addressing the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services needs of the State. The plan shall be consistent with the plan developed pursuant to G.S. 122C-102 and shall address the following:

“(1) The service needed at the community level within each LME in order to ensure an adequate level of services to the average number of persons needing the services based on population projections.‘

“(2) The full continuum of services needed for each disability group within an LME, including:

“a. Which services could be regional or multi-LME based;

“b. What percent of the population each LME would expect to use State-level facilities; and

“c. An inventory of existing services within each LME for each disability group, and the gaps that exist;

“(3) Projected growth in services for each disability group within each LME or region that can reasonably be managed over the ensuing five-year period; and

“(4) Projected start-up costs and the total funding needed in each year from the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs to implement the long-range plan.

“Funds shall not be transferred from the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs until the Secretary has consulted with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Chairs of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services and the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services.

“(b) The Department shall use not less than fifty percent (50%) of moneys in the Trust Fund established pursuant to G.S. 143-15D for the 2005-2006 fiscal year for nonrecurring start-up funds for community-based services, including funding for existing area program services to transition to the private sector or to another public service agency. Moneys in the Trust Fund may be used to expand recurring community-based services only if sufficient recurring funds can be identified within the Department from funds currently budgeted for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, area mental health programs or county programs, or local government.

“(c) Not later than March 1, 2006, the Department of Health and Human Services shall report on the implementation of this section to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 10.49(u), provides: “In keeping with the United States Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. & E.W. and State policy to provide appropriate services to clients in the least restrictive and most appropriate environment, the Department of Health and Human Services shall continue to implement a plan for the transition of patients from State psychiatric hospitals to the community or to other long-term care facilities, as appropriate. The goal is to develop mechanisms and identify resources needed to enable patients and their families to receive the necessary services and supports based on the following guiding principles:

“(1) Individuals shall be provided acute psychiatric care in non-State facilities when appropriate.

“(2) Individuals shall be provided acute psychiatric care in State facilities only when non-State facilities are unavailable.

“(3) Individuals shall receive evidence-based psychiatric services and care that are cost-efficient.

“(4) The State shall minimize cost shifting to other State and local facilities or institutions.

“The Department of Health and Human Services shall conduct an analysis of the individual patient service needs and shall develop and implement an individual transition plan, as appropriate, for patients in each hospital. The State shall ensure that each individual transition plan, as appropriate, shall take into consideration the availability of appropriate alternative placements based on the needs of the patient and within resources available for the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system. In developing each plan, the Department shall consult with the patient and the patient’s family or other legal representative.

“The Department of Health and Human Services shall submit reports on the status of implementation of this section to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division. These reports shall be submitted on December 1, 2007, and May 1, 2008.”

For similar prior provisions see S.L. 2005-276, ss. 10.28(a) to (d).

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.29(a), provides: “In accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ plan for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system reform, the Department shall ensure that the downsizing of the State’s regional mental retardation facilities is continuously based upon residents’ needs and the availability of community-based services with a targeted goal of four percent (4%) each year. The Department shall implement cost-containment and reduction strategies to ensure the corresponding financial and staff downsizing of each facility. The Department shall manage the client population of the mental retardation centers in order to ensure that placements for ICF-MR level of care shall be made in non-State facilities. Admissions to State ICF-MR facilities are permitted only as a last resort and only upon approval of the Department. The corresponding budgets for each of the State mental retardation centers shall be reduced, and positions shall be eliminated as the census of each facility decreases. At no time shall mental retardation center positions be transferred to other units within a facility or assigned nondirect care activities such as outreach.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.29(b), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall apply any savings in State appropriations in each year of the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium that result from reductions in beds or services as follows:

“(1) The Department shall place nonrecurring savings in the Trust Fund for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services and Bridge Funding Needs and use the savings to facilitate the transition of clients into appropriate community-based services and support in accordance with G.S. 143-15.3D;

“(2) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, shall retain recurring savings realized through implementation of this section to support the recurring costs of additional community-based placements from Division facilities in accordance with Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W. In determining the savings in this section, savings shall include all savings realized from the downsizing of the State mental retardation centers, including the savings in direct State appropriations in the budgets of the State mental retardation centers; and

“(3) The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance, shall transfer any recurring Medicaid savings resulting from the downsizing of State-operated MR centers from the ICF-MR line in Medicaid to the CAP-MR/DD line.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.29(c), provides: “Consistent with the requirements of this section, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall develop a plan to ensure that there are sufficient developmental disability/mental retardation regional centers to correspond with service catchment areas. The Plan shall address:

“(1) Methods of funding for community services necessitated by down-sizing;

“(2) How many State-operated beds and non-State operated beds are needed to serve the population; and

“(3) Alternative uses for facilities.

“Not later than April 1, 2006, the Department shall report on the development of the plan, and not later than April 1, 2007, shall report the final plan, including recommendations for legislative action, to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.29(d), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall report on its progress in complying with this section to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division. The Department shall submit the progress report no later than January 15, 2006, and submit a final report no later than May 1, 2006.”

For prior provisions, see Session Laws 2003-284, ss 10.14(a)-(d).

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 12F.1, as amended by Session Laws 2017-212, s. 3.1, provides: “(a) Definitions. — As used in this section, the following terms have the following meanings:

“(1) Department. — The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

“(2) FQHC. — A federally qualified health center located in this State.

“(3) Prescriber. — Anyone authorized to prescribe drugs pursuant to the laws of this State.

“(4) Program participant. — An individual who (i) has been clinically assessed and diagnosed with opioid addiction, (ii) is selected by an FQHC to participate in the pilot program authorized by this section, and (iii) as part of the pilot program, receives the nonnarcotic, nonaddictive, extended-release, injectable formulation of opioid antagonist approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence.

“(b) Pilot Program. — The Department shall oversee the administration of a three-year pilot program to be conducted by designated FQHCs to address North Carolina’s growing opioid addiction and overdose crisis. The goal of the pilot program is to study the effectiveness of combining behavioral therapy with the utilization of a nonnarcotic, nonaddictive, extended-release, injectable formulation of opioid antagonist approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence. In conducting the pilot program, selected FQHCs may collaborate with the Department, the North Carolina Institute of Medicine (NCIOM), and any other qualified entity or State agency that may be of assistance in accomplishing the objectives of the pilot program. Prior to the initiation of this pilot program, the Department shall, in collaboration with the NCIOM or any other qualified entity, determine the number of program participants needed to participate in the pilot program in order to ensure sufficient statistical significance to support any conclusions about the effectiveness of the pilot program.

“(c) Selection of Participating FQHCs. — Not later than 30 days after the effective date of this section, the Department shall select a minimum of three and not more than five FQHCs located in different areas of the State to participate in the pilot program authorized by this section, giving first priority to FQHCs that have received supplemental grant funds from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, for substance abuse service expansion with a focus on medication-assisted treatment in opioid use disorders.

“(d) Selection of Program Participants. — Not later than 60 days after the effective date of this section, the Department shall develop, in collaboration with the NCIOM or any other qualified entity, a methodology for selecting program participants at each FQHC. Only individuals who have been clinically assessed and diagnosed with opioid addiction may be selected and treated as program participants. Individuals who have been referred from local criminal justice agencies may be selected as program participants.

“(e) Treatment Standards. — As a condition of participating in the pilot program authorized by this section, each FQHC shall sign a written participation agreement provided by the Department that requires the FQHC to adhere to at least all of the following treatment standards for the duration of its participation in the pilot program:

“(1) Treatment may be provided to program participants only by a treatment provider who is affiliated with a participating FQHC.

“(2) Only individuals who have been clinically assessed and diagnosed with opioid addiction may be selected and treated as program participants.

“(3) Treatment providers at participating FQHCs shall do all of the following:

“a. Provide treatment based on an integrated service delivery model that consists of the coordination of care between a prescriber and an addiction services provider.

“b. Conduct any necessary additional professional, comprehensive substance use disorder and mental health diagnostic assessments of individuals under consideration for selection as pilot program participants to determine if they would benefit from substance use disorder treatment and monitoring.

“c. Determine, based on the assessments described in sub-subdivision b. of this subdivision, the treatment needs of the program participants served by the treatment provider.

“d. Develop individualized treatment goals and objectives for each program participant.

“e. Provide program participants with access to medication-assisted treatment utilizing a nonnarcotic, nonaddictive, extended-release, injectable formulation of opioid antagonist.

“f. In addition to medication-assisted treatment, provide program participants with other types of therapies, including behavioral therapies, outpatient programs, and community support, for opioid use disorder and any other disorders that are determined by the treatment provider to be co-occurring disorders.

“g. In the case of medication-assisted treatment provided under the pilot program, a drug may be used only if it has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with behavioral therapy for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence.

“h. Comply with all applicable federal opioid treatment standards.

“i.Monitor the progress of program participants through the use of regular drug testing, including urinalysis..

“(f) FQHC Reports. — No later than 60 days after the effective date of this section, the Department shall, in collaboration with the NCIOM or any other qualified entity, develop a standardized methodology for the collection of information on program participants at each FQHC. As a condition of participating in the pilot program authorized by this section, each selected FQHC must agree to follow this standardized methodology for (i) collecting information on program participants and (ii) annually reporting that information to the Department, in the format prescribed by the Department. The annual report shall include at least all of the following information, in the format prescribed by the Department:

“(1) For each program participant, that individual’s age, sex, and length of treatment. This information shall be reported to the Department in a manner that does not disclose personally identifying information about program participants.

“(2) The total number of program participants who successfully transitioned to opioid abstinence for a minimum of 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months, 12 months, and 18 months.

“(3) The amount of State appropriations expended on a per program participant basis at each participating FQHC..

“(g) Evaluation of Pilot Program. — By November 1, 2020, the Department shall conduct and submit to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of this pilot program in addressing North Carolina’s growing opioid addiction and overdose crisis. The Department may contract with an institution of higher education or other qualified entity with expertise in evaluating programs similar to the pilot program authorized by this section. The comprehensive evaluation shall include whether this pilot program was successful as measured by at least all of the following:

“(1) The total number of program participants who successfully transitioned to opioid abstinence for a minimum of 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months, 12 months, and 18 months.

“(2) A cost-benefit analysis of the pilot program.

“(h) Expiration. — The pilot program conducted at each selected FQHC shall expire no later than three years after the date of its commencement at that particular FQHC.’

“(i) Funds in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) from the federal Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant shall be allocated to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, for the 2016-2017 fiscal year. These funds shall be allocated to the FQHCs selected to participate in the pilot program authorized by this section on a per program participant basis to offset the cost of the following services:

“(1) Medication dispensed to program participants.

“(2) Provider fees for services rendered to program participants.

“(3) Up to 14 days of detoxification services.

“(4) Behavioral therapy for program participants.

“(5) Drug testing and monitoring of program participants.

“(j) Subsection (i) of this section becomes effective July 1, 2016. The remainder of this section is effective when it becomes law.”

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 12F.10, as amended by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.6(a), (b), provides: “(a) The General Assembly finds that behavioral health services within the State are fragmented and a statewide comprehensive plan is necessary to ensure that individuals with behavioral health needs are timely served in the most appropriate settings and with the most appropriate services in order to achieve the best possible outcomes. The General Assembly further finds the absence of a statewide strategic plan that defines, coordinates, and facilitates the allocation of resources for needed services is an obstacle to improving the desired outcomes for behavioral health services in this State. It is the intention of the General Assembly to improve the delivery and coordination of behavioral health services across the State by targeting State resources to identified needs of covered populations and to treatments and services most effective at producing positive, measurable outcomes.

“(b) By January 1, 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services shall develop and submit to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice, and the Fiscal Research Division a strategic statewide plan to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of State-funded behavioral health services. In developing the plan, the Department shall review and consider its past and current studies, and associated reports, relating to behavioral health services in the State. The plan shall include at least all of the following:

“(1) Identification of the Division that will (i) assume lead responsibility for the organization and delivery of publicly funded behavioral health services and (ii) define the current and future roles and responsibilities of local management entities/managed care organizations (LME/MCOs) with respect to the organization and delivery of publicly funded behavioral health services.

“(2) A process for ensuring that all State contracts with behavioral health providers and managed care organizations responsible for managing Medicaid behavioral health services (including LME/MCOs) contain goals for overall behavioral health services, along with specific measurable outcomes for all publicly funded mental health, developmental disabilities, substance abuse, and traumatic brain injury services.

“(3) A statewide needs assessment for mental health, developmental disabilities, substance abuse, and traumatic brain injury services by county and type of service, broken down by the source of funding. The needs assessment must include a defined service continuum to address identified needs for targeted populations.

“(4) Specific solvency standards to be incorporated into State contracts with LME/MCOs that define appropriate cash balances, predictors for sustainability, and measures for performance that the LME/MCOs will monitor and report to the Department on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.

“(5) Any other component, study, or report that the Department deems necessary to achieve the goal of improving the effective and efficient delivery and coordination of publicly funded behavioral health services across the State.

“(b1) In the development of the strategic statewide plan, required under subsection (b) of this section, the Department of Health and Human Services shall consider policy issues pertaining to the delivery of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Consideration shall be given to all of the following:

“(1) The causes and potential solutions for the growing waitlist for NC Innovations Waiver slots. Potential solutions to be studied include the following:

“a. Increasing the funding for the 1915(c) Innovations Waiver to result in more individuals served.

“b. Creating new support waiver slots as recommended in the March 2015 “Study Additional 1915(c) Waiver” report from the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance, to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services.

“c. Utilizing a 1915(i) waiver option and exploring how the 1115 waiver required for Medicaid transformation may assist in addressing current waitlist for services.

“(2) Issues surrounding single-stream funding and how single-stream funding is used to support services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“(3) Multiple federal mandates that will directly impact current services and supports for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, including Home and Community-Based Services changes, the Work Force Innovations and Opportunities Act, and changes under section 14(c) of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.

“(4) The coverage of services for the treatment of autism, including any State Plan amendment needed to address guidance issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”

“(c) The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice shall each establish a subcommittee on Behavioral Health Services. The subcommittees shall meet jointly to do the following:

“(1) Oversee the Department’s development of the strategic plan required by subsection (b) of this section.

“(2) Review the strategic plan developed by the Department in accordance with subsection (b) of this section, including a review of all performance-related goals and measures for the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, substance abuse, and traumatic brain injury services.

“(3) Review consolidated monthly, quarterly, and annual reports and analyses of behavioral health services funded by Medicaid and State-only appropriations.

“The subcommittees shall jointly make recommendations about the areas of oversight and review described in subdivisions (1) through (3) of this subsection and report their findings and recommendations to their respective committees. In conducting the required oversight and review, the subcommittees may seek input from other states, stakeholders, and national experts as they deem necessary in conducting their examination and developing their recommendations.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.7, provides: “Of the funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the sum of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) in recurring funds for the 2018-2019 fiscal year shall be allocated as a grant to the North Carolina Association of People Supporting Employment First (NC APSE) to develop and implement training programs for the Department, including online training modules, on the provision of evidence-based supported employment services for individuals in targeted populations, in order to assist these individuals with preparation for, identification of, and maintenance of integrated, paid, competitive employment. The Department shall make these training programs available throughout the State to (i) employers that have hired or are willing to hire individuals in targeted populations, (ii) service providers of local management entities/managed care organizations, and (iii) any other entity the Department determines will benefit from receiving this training in order to achieve improved employment outcomes for individuals in targeted populations. As used in this section, ‘individuals in targeted populations’ means individuals with serious mental illness who are in or at risk of entry to an adult care home and individuals with intellectual disabilities, developmental disabilities, or both.”

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2001-424, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Acts of 2001.’ ”

Session Laws 2001-424, s. 36.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2001-2003 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2001-2003 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2001-424, s. 36.5, is a severability clause.

For provisions of Session Laws 2001-437, ss. 3(a) to 3(d), relating to certification of area authorities and county programs to administer and deliver mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, see note at G.S. 122C-10 .

Session Laws 2003-284, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2003’.”

Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2003-2005 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2003-284, s. 49.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2005’.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2005-2007 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 46.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2007’.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2007-2009 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2011.’ ”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 32.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 12F.3, provides: “(a) Funds appropriated in this act to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, for the 2016-2017 fiscal year to implement the recommendations of the Governor’s Task Force on Mental Health and Substance Use established pursuant to Executive Order No. 76 (Governor’s Task Force) shall be deposited into the reserve fund established pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.

“(b) The Mental Health and Substance Use Task Force Reserve Fund is hereby established as a fund within the General Fund. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, monies in the Reserve Fund shall not revert at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain available until expended. Monies in the Fund may only be expended to implement the recommendations of the Governor’s Task Force; provided, however, that no funds shall be expended until both of the following conditions have been met:

“(1) The Department of Health and Human Services shall obtain the prior approval of the Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) on a detailed implementation plan with key milestones and due dates.

“(2) The Department of Health and Human Services shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services and the Fiscal Research Division within 10 days after obtaining the approval required by subdivision (1) of this subsection. The report shall include (i) an explanation of the specific amounts and uses of these funds and (ii) a detailed implementation plan with key milestones, due dates, and expected outcomes.”

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2016.’ ”

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2016-2017 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2016-2017 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2016-94, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2018.’ ”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2018-2019 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2018-2019 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 2(a), effective July 19, 2006, added “system performance measures” to the section heading; rewrote the previously existing provisions of the section as subsections (a) and (b); and added subsection (c).

Session Laws 2011-291, s. 2.42, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in the last sentence of subsection (c).

Legal Periodicals.

For comment, “Outsourcing Our Children: The Failure to Treat Mental Illness In-State,” see 36 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 66 (2013).

§§ 122C-103 through 122C-110.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2. State, County and Area Authority.

§ 122C-111. Administration.

The Secretary shall administer and enforce the provisions of this Chapter and the rules of the Commission and shall operate State facilities. An area director or program director shall (i) manage the public mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse system for the area authority or county program according to the local business plan, and (ii) enforce applicable State laws, rules of the Commission, and rules of the Secretary. The Secretary in cooperation with area and county program directors and State facility directors shall provide for the coordination of public services between area authorities, county programs, and State facilities. The area authority or county program shall monitor the provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services for compliance with the law, which monitoring and management shall not supersede or duplicate the regulatory authority or functions of agencies of the Department.

History. 1963, c. 1166, s. 3; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2001-437, s. 1.6; 2002-164, s. 4.2; 2006-142, s. 4(b).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4(b), effective July 19, 2006, substituted “shall (i) manage the public mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse system for the area authority or county program according to the local business plan, and (ii) enforce” for “shall administer the programs of the area authority or county program, as applicable, and enforce” in the second sentence; and substituted “disabilities” for “disability,” and inserted “and management” in the last sentence.

§ 122C-112. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.7(a), effective July 1, 2002.

§ 122C-112.1. Powers and duties of the Secretary.

  1. The Secretary shall do all of the following:
    1. Oversee development and implementation of the State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.
    2. Enforce the provisions of this Chapter and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary.
    3. Establish a process and criteria for the submission, review, and approval or disapproval of LME business plans submitted by area authorities and county programs for the management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    4. Adopt rules specifying the content and format of LME business plans.
    5. Review LME business plans and, upon approval of the plan, certify the submitting area authority or county program to manage the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the applicable catchment area.
    6. Establish comprehensive, cohesive oversight and monitoring procedures and processes to ensure continuous compliance by area authorities, county programs, and all providers of public services with State and federal policy, law, and standards. The procedures shall include the development and use of critical performance measures and report cards for each area authority and county program.
    7. Conduct regularly scheduled monitoring and oversight of area authority, county programs, and all providers of public services. Monitoring and oversight shall be used to assess compliance with the LME business plan and implementation of core LME functions. Monitoring shall also include the examination of LME and provider performance on outcome measures including adherence to best practices, the assessment of consumer satisfaction, and the review of client rights complaints.
    8. Make findings and recommendations based on information and data collected pursuant to subdivision (7) of this subsection and submit these findings and recommendations to the applicable area authority board, county program director, board of county commissioners, providers of public services, and to the Local Consumer Advocacy Office.
    9. Provide ongoing and focused technical assistance to area authorities and county programs in the implementation of the LME functions and the establishment and operation of community-based programs. The technical assistance required under this subdivision includes, but is not limited to, the technical assistance required under G.S. 122C-115.4(d)(2). The Secretary shall include in the State Plan a mechanism for monitoring the Department’s success in implementing this duty and the progress of area authorities and county programs in achieving these functions.
    10. Operate State facilities and adopt rules pertaining to their operation.
    11. Develop a unified system of services provided at the community level, by State facilities, and by providers enrolled or under a contract with the State and an area authority or county program.
    12. Adopt rules governing the expenditure of all funds for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse programs and services.
    13. Adopt rules to implement the appeal procedure authorized by G.S. 122C-151.2 .
    14. Implement the uniform portal process developed under rules adopted by the Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services in accordance with G.S. 122C-114 .
    15. Except as provided in G.S. 122C-26(4), adopt rules establishing procedures for waiver of rules adopted by the Secretary under this Chapter.
    16. Notify the clerks of superior court of changes in the designation of State facility regions and of facilities designated under G.S. 122C-252 .
    17. Promote public awareness and understanding of mental health, mental illness, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
    18. Administer and enforce rules that are conditions of participation for federal or State financial aid.
    19. Carry out G.S. 122C-361 .
    20. Monitor the fiscal and administrative practices of area authorities and county programs to ensure that the programs are accountable to the State for the management and use of federal and State funds allocated for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. The Secretary shall ensure maximum accountability by area authorities and county programs for rate-setting methodologies, reimbursement procedures, billing procedures, provider contracting procedures, record keeping, documentation, and other matters pertaining to financial management and fiscal accountability. The Secretary shall further ensure that the practices are consistent with professionally accepted accounting and management principles.
    21. Provide technical assistance, including conflict resolution, to counties in the development and implementation of area authority and county program business plans and other matters, as requested by the county.
    22. Develop a methodology to be used for calculating county resources to reflect cash and in-kind contributions of the county.
    23. Adopt rules establishing program evaluation and management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    24. Adopt rules regarding the requirements of the federal government for grants-in-aid for mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse programs which may be made available to area authorities or county programs or the State. This section shall be liberally construed in order that the State and its citizens may benefit from the grants-in-aid.
    25. Adopt rules for determining minimally adequate services for purposes of G.S. 122C-124.1 and G.S. 122C-125 .
    26. Establish a process for approving area authorities and county programs to provide services directly in accordance with G.S. 122C-141 .
    27. Sponsor training opportunities in the fields of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
    28. Enforce the protection of the rights of clients served by State facilities, area authorities, county programs, and providers of public services.
    29. Adopt rules for the enforcement of the protection of the rights of clients being served by State facilities, area authorities, county programs, and providers of public services.
    30. Prior to requesting approval to close a State facility under G.S. 122C-181(b):
      1. Notify the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, and members of the General Assembly who represent catchment areas affected by the closure; and
      2. Present a plan for the closure to the members of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, and the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services for their review, advice, and recommendations. The plan shall address specifically how patients will be cared for after closure, how support services to community-based agencies and outreach services will be continued, and the impact on remaining State facilities. In implementing the plan, the Secretary shall take into consideration the comments and recommendations of the committees to which the plan is presented under this subdivision.
    31. Ensure that the State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services is coordinated with the Medicaid State Plan and NC Health Choice.
    32. Implement standard forms, quality measures, contracts, processes, and procedures to be used by all area authorities and county programs with other public and private service providers. The Secretary shall consult with LMEs, CFACs, counties, and qualified providers regarding the development of any forms, processes, and procedures required under this subdivision. Any document, process, or procedure developed under this subdivision shall place an obligation upon providers to transmit to LMEs timely client information and outcome data. The Secretary shall also adopt rules regarding what constitutes a clean claim for purposes of billing.When implementing this subdivision, the Secretary shall balance the need for LMEs to exercise discretion in the discharge of their LME functions with the need of qualified providers for a uniform system of doing business with public entities.
    33. Develop and implement critical performance indicators to be used to hold LMEs accountable for managing the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services system. The performance system indicators shall be implemented no later than July 1, 2007.
    34. Adopt a copayment schedule for behavioral health services, intellectual and developmental disabilities services, and substance use disorder services based on the Medicaid copayments for those services to be used by LMEs and by contractual provider agencies under G.S. 122C-146 . The copayment schedule adopted under this subdivision shall require a copayment for services identified by the Secretary. Families whose family income is three hundred percent (300%) or greater of the federal poverty level are eligible for services with the applicable copayment.
    35. Develop and adopt rules governing a statewide data system containing waiting list information obtained annually from each LME as required under G.S. 122C-115.4(b)(8). The rules adopted shall establish standardized criteria to be used by LMEs to ensure that the waiting list data are consistent across LMEs. The Department shall use data collected from LMEs under G.S. 122C-115.4(b)(8) for statewide planning and needs projections. The creation of the statewide waiting list data system does not create an entitlement to services for individuals on the waiting list. The Department shall report annually to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services its recommendations based on data obtained annually from each LME. The report shall indicate the services that are most needed throughout the State, plans to address unmet needs, and any cost projections for providing needed services.
    36. The Department shall ensure that developmental disability services funded from State appropriations to or allocations from the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, including CAP-MRDD are authorized on a quarterly, semiannual, or annual basis, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department, unless a change in the individual’s person-centered plan indicates a different authorization frequency.
    37. The Department shall develop new developmental disability service definitions for developmental disability services funded from State appropriations to or allocations from the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, including CAP-MRDD that allow for person-centered and self-directed supports.
    38. Adopt rules establishing a procedure for single-county disengagement from an area authority operating under a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.
    39. Develop and use a standard contract for all local management entity/managed care organizations for operation of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver that requires compliance by each LME/MCO with all provisions of the contract to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver and with all applicable provisions of State and federal law.
  2. The Secretary may do the following:
    1. Acquire, by purchase or otherwise in the name of the Department, equipment, supplies, and other personal property necessary to carry out the mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse programs.
    2. Promote and conduct research in the fields of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse; promote best practices.
    3. Receive donations of money, securities, equipment, supplies, or any other personal property of any kind or description that shall be used by the Secretary for the purpose of carrying out mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse programs. Any donations shall be reported to the Office of State Budget and Management as determined by that office.
    4. Accept, allocate, and spend any federal funds for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse activities that may be made available to the State by the federal government. This Chapter shall be liberally construed in order that the State and its citizens may benefit fully from these funds. Any federal funds received shall be deposited with the Department of State Treasurer and shall be appropriated by the General Assembly for the mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse purposes specified.
    5. Enter into agreements authorized by G.S. 122C-346 .
    6. Notwithstanding G.S. 126-18 , authorize funds for contracting with a person, firm, or corporation for aid or assistance in locating, recruiting, or arranging employment of health care professionals in any facility listed in G.S. 122C-181 .
    7. Contract with one or more private providers or other public service agencies to serve clients of an area authority or county program and reallocate program funds to pay for services under the contract if the Secretary finds all of the following:
      1. The area authority or county program refuses or has failed to provide the services to clients within its catchment area, or provide specialty services in another catchment area, in a manner that is at least adequate.
      2. Clients within the area authority or county program catchment area will either not be served or will suffer an unreasonable hardship if required to obtain the services from another area authority or county program.
      3. There is at least one private provider or public service agency within the area authority or county program catchment area, or within reasonable proximity to the catchment area, willing and able to provide services under contract. Before contracting with a private provider as authorized under this subdivision, the Secretary shall provide written notification to the area authority or county program and to the applicable participating boards of county commissioners of the Secretary’s intent to contract and shall provide the area authority or county program and the applicable participating boards of county commissioners an opportunity to be heard.
    8. Contract with one or more private providers or other public service agencies to serve clients from more than one area authority or county program and reallocate the funds of the applicable programs to pay for services under the contract if the Secretary finds either that there is no other area authority or county program available to act as the administrative entity under contract with the provider or that the area authority or county program refuses or has failed to properly manage and administer the contract with the contract provider, and clients will either not be served or will suffer unreasonable hardship if services are not provided under the contract. Before contracting with a private provider as authorized under this subdivision, the Secretary shall provide written notification to the area authority or county program and the applicable participating boards of county commissioners of the Secretary’s intent to contract and shall provide the area authority or county program and the applicable participating boards of county commissioners an opportunity to be heard.
    9. Require reports of client characteristics, staffing patterns, agency policies or activities, services, or specific financial data of the area authority, county program, and providers of public services. The reports shall not identify individual clients of the area authority or county program unless specifically required by State law or by federal law or regulation or unless valid consent for the release has been given by the client or legally responsible person.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.7(b); 2006-142, s. 4(m); 2007-410, s. 2; 2007-504, s. 2.2; 2009-186, s. 2; 2011-291, ss. 2.43, 2.44; 2012-151, s. 7(b); 2013-85, s. 3; 2021-77, s. 3.

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4(m), effective July 19, 2006, rewrote subsection (a).

Session Laws 2007-410, s. 2, effective August 21, 2007, added subdivision (a)(34).

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 2.2, effective October 1, 2007, substituted the present subdivision (a)(14) for the former subdivision (a)(14), which read “Adopt rules for the implementation of the uniform portal process.”

Session Laws 2009-186, s. 2, effective July 1, 2009, added subdivisions (a)(35) through (a)(37).

Session Laws 2011-291, ss. 2.43 and 2.44, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in sub-subdivisions (a)(30)a. and (a)(30)b., and subdivision (a)(35).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 3, effective July 2, 2021, rewrote subdivision (a)(34).

CASE NOTES

The State, acting through the Secretary, was responsible for a young incompetent adult who, from birth, had been a ward of the State or of a guardian appointed by the State, and the Secretary at her election could provide required treatment of this individual through local authorities. Thomas S. v. Morrow, 781 F.2d 367, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21712 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124, 106 S. Ct. 1992, 90 L. Ed. 2d 673, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 3166 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 869, 107 S. Ct. 235, 93 L. Ed. 2d 161, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4118 (1986) (decided under former § 122-35.36).

§ 122C-113. Cooperation between Secretary and other agencies. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. The Secretary shall cooperate with other State agencies to coordinate services for the treatment and habilitation of individuals who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers. The Secretary shall also coordinate with these agencies to provide public education to promote a better understanding of mental illness, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
  2. The Secretary shall promote cooperation among area facilities, State facilities, and local agencies to facilitate the provision of services to individuals who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers.

    (b1) The Secretary shall cooperate with the State Board of Education and the Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety in coordinating the responsibilities of the Department of Health and Human Services, the State Board of Education, the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, and the Department of Public Instruction for adolescent substance abuse programs. The Department of Health and Human Services, through its Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, in cooperation with the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, shall be responsible for intervention and treatment in non-school based programs. The State Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruction, in consultation with the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, shall have primary responsibility for in-school education, identification, and intervention services, including student assistance programs.

  3. The Secretary shall adopt rules to assure this coordination.

History. 1963, c. 1166, s. 3; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 863, s. 1; 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1993, c. 522, s. 9; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 4(s); 2000-137, s. 4(v); 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2017-186, s. 2(mmmmm).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(mmmmm), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” throughout subsection (b1).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), in subsection (b1), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” four times. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-113. Cooperation between Secretary and other agencies. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. The Secretary shall cooperate with other State agencies to coordinate services for the treatment and habilitation of individuals who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers. The Secretary shall also coordinate with these agencies to provide public education to promote a better understanding of mental illness, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse.
  2. The Secretary shall promote cooperation among area facilities, State facilities, and local agencies to facilitate the provision of services to individuals who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers.

    (b1) The Secretary shall cooperate with the State Board of Education and the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety in coordinating the responsibilities of the Department of Health and Human Services, the State Board of Education, the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, and the Department of Public Instruction for adolescent substance abuse programs. The Department of Health and Human Services, through its Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, in cooperation with the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, shall be responsible for intervention and treatment in non-school based programs. The State Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruction, in consultation with the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety, shall have primary responsibility for in-school education, identification, and intervention services, including student assistance programs.

  3. The Secretary shall adopt rules to assure this coordination.

History. 1963, c. 1166, s. 3; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 863, s. 1; 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1993, c. 522, s. 9; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 4(s); 2000-137, s. 4(v); 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2017-186, s. 2(mmmmm); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(mmmmm), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” throughout subsection (b1).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), in subsection (b1), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” four times. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-114. Powers and duties of the Commission.

  1. The Commission shall have authority as provided by this Chapter, Chapters 90 and 148 of the General Statutes, and by G.S. 143B-147 .
  2. The Commission shall adopt rules regarding all of the following:
    1. The development of a process for screening, triage, and referral, including a uniform portal process, for implementation by the Secretary as required under G.S. 122C-112.1(14).
    2. LME monitoring of providers of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    3. LME provision of technical assistance to providers of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    4. The requirements of a qualified public or private provider as that term is used in G.S. 122C-141 . In adopting rules under this subsection, the Commission shall take into account the need to ensure fair competition among providers.

History. C.S., s. 6153; 1929, c. 265, s. 1; 1933, c. 342, s. 1; 1943, cc. 32, 164; 1945, c. 952, s. 9; 1947, c. 537, s. 5; 1957, c. 1232, s. 1; 1959, c. 348, s. 3; c. 1002, s. 3; c. 1028, ss. 1, 2, 3, 5; 1963, c. 451, s. 1; c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2007-504, s. 2.3; 2012-66, s. 1.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 2.3, effective October 1, 2007, designated the existing provisions as subsection (a) and added subsection (b).

§ 122C-115. Duties of counties; appropriation and allocation of funds by counties and cities.

  1. A county shall provide mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in accordance with rules, policies, and guidelines adopted pursuant to statewide restructuring of the management responsibilities for the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual or other developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders under a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver through an area authority. Beginning July 1, 2012, the catchment area of an area authority shall contain a minimum population of at least 300,000. Beginning July 1, 2013, the catchment area of an area authority shall contain a minimum population of at least 500,000. To the extent this section conflicts with G.S. 153A-77 or G.S. 122C-115.1 , the provisions of this section control. (a1) Effective July 1, 2012, the Department shall reduce the administrative funding for LMEs that do not comply with the minimum population requirement of 300,000 to a rate consistent with the funding rate provided to LMEs with a population of 300,000.

    (a2) Effective July 1, 2013, the Department shall reassign management responsibilities for Medicaid funds and State funds away from LMEs that are not in compliance with the minimum population requirement of 500,000 to LMEs that are fully compliant with all catchment area requirements, including the minimum population requirements specified in this section.

    (a3) A county that wishes to disengage from a local management entity/managed care organization and realign with another multicounty area authority operating under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver may do so with the approval of the Secretary. The Secretary shall adopt rules to establish a process for county disengagement that shall ensure, at a minimum, the following:

    1. Provision of services is not disrupted by the disengagement.
    2. The disengaging county either is in compliance or plans to merge with an area authority that is in compliance with population requirements provided in G.S. 122C-115(a) of this section.
    3. The timing of the disengagement is accounted for and does not conflict with setting capitation rates.
    4. Adequate notice is provided to the affected counties, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the General Assembly.
    5. Provision for distribution of any real property no longer within the catchment area of the area authority.
  2. Counties shall and cities may appropriate funds for the support of programs that serve the catchment area, whether the programs are physically located within a single county or whether any facility housing a program is owned and operated by the city or county. Counties and cities may make appropriations for the purposes of this Chapter and may allocate for these purposes other revenues not restricted by law, and counties may fund them by levy of property taxes pursuant to G.S. 153A-149(c)(22).
  3. Except as authorized in G.S. 122C-115.1 , within a catchment area designated in the business plan pursuant to G.S. 122C-115.2 , a board of county commissioners or two or more boards of county commissioners jointly shall establish an area authority with the approval of the Secretary. (c1) Area authorities may add one or more additional counties to their existing catchment area upon the adoption of a resolution to that effect by a majority of the members of the area board and the approval of the Secretary.
  4. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, counties shall not reduce county appropriations and expenditures for current operations and ongoing programs and services of area authorities or county programs because of the availability of State-allocated funds, fees, capitation amounts, or fund balance to the area authority or county program. Counties may reduce county appropriations by the amount previously appropriated by the county for one-time, nonrecurring special needs of the area authority or county program.
  5. Beginning on the date that capitated contracts under Article 4 of Chapter 108D of the General Statutes begin, LME/MCOs shall cease managing Medicaid services for all Medicaid recipients other than recipients described in G.S. 108D-40(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), (7), (10), (11), (12), and (13). Until BH IDD tailored plans become operational, all of the following shall occur:
    1. LME/MCOs shall continue to manage the Medicaid services that are covered by the LME/MCOs under the combined 1915(b) and (c) waivers for Medicaid recipients described in G.S. 108D-40(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), (7), (10), (11), (12), and (13).
    2. The Division of Health Benefits shall negotiate actuarially sound capitation rates directly with the LME/MCOs based on the change in composition of the population being served by the LME/MCOs.
    3. Capitation payments under contracts between the Division of Health Benefits and the LME/MCOs shall be made directly to the LME/MCO by the Division of Health Benefits.
  6. Entities operating the BH IDD tailored plans under G.S. 108D-60 may continue to manage the behavioral health, intellectual and developmental disability, and traumatic brain injury services for any Medicaid recipients described in G.S. 108D-40(a)(4), (5), (7), (10), (11), (12), and (13) under any contract with the Department in accordance with G.S. 108D-60 (b).

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, ss. 5, 23; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 1; 1999-202, s. 1; 2001-437, s. 1.8; 2004-124, s. 10.26(a); 2006-66, s. 10.32(c), (d); 2007-504, s. 1.3; 2011-264, s. 2; 2012-151, ss. 1, 6; 2013-85, s. 4(a)-(c); 2013-363, s. 4.12(a); 2013-378, s. 11; 2013-410, s. 23(a); 2015-245, s. 4; 2018-48, s. 1; 2019-81, ss. 12, 14(a)(8); 2020-88, s. 12(c); 2021-62, ss. 3.4A(b), 4.8(d).

School-Based Child and Family Team Initiative.

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 6.24, provides for the development and implementation of a School-Based Child and Family Team Initiative. See note at G.S. 115C-105.20 .

Session Laws 2021-62, s. 3.5A.(a)-(h), provides “(a) When a county disengages from one area authority and realigns with another area authority under G.S. 122C-115 , a portion of the risk reserve and other funds of the area authority from which the county is disengaging shall be transferred to the area authority with which the county is realigning. The amount of risk reserve and other funds to be transferred shall be determined by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in accordance with a formula or formulas developed in accordance with this section.

“(b) Any formula developed by DHHS under this section shall consider the stability of both the area authority from which the county is disengaging and the area authority with which the county is realigning. The formula shall support the ability for each area authority to carry out its responsibilities under State law and shall support the successful operation of BH IDD tailored plans under G.S. 108D-60 . The formula shall assure that the area authority from which the county is disengaging retains sufficient funds to pay any outstanding liabilities to health care providers, staff-related expenses, and other liabilities.

“(c) Upon the Secretary’s approval of a disengagement under G.S. 122C-115(a3), the area authority from which the county is disengaging and the area authority with which the county is realigning shall provide DHHS with all financial information requested by DHHS that is necessary to determine the amount of funds to be transferred using the formula or formulas developed under this section.

“(d) Prior to finalizing any formula developed under this section, DHHS shall post the proposed formula on its website and provide notice of the proposed formula to all area authorities, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice, and the Fiscal Research Division. DHHS shall accept public comment on the proposed formula. DHHS shall post the final version of the formula on its website no later than August 1, 2021.

“(e) No later than October 15, 2021, DHHS shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice, and the Fiscal Research Division on any formulas developed under this section and any funds transferred during the previous quarter. Beginning January 15, 2022, and quarterly thereafter through April 15, 2026, DHHS shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice, and the Fiscal Research Division on any funds transferred as a result of disengagements during the previous quarter. A final quarterly report shall be due June 30, 2026, for the quarter ending on that date.

“(f) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the development and application of the formula or formulas under this section shall be exempt from the rulemaking requirements under Article 2A of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes and the contested case provisions of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.

“(g) This section is effective when it becomes law and applies to disengagements approved by DHHS with an effective date on or after September 1, 2021.

“(h) This section shall expire on June 30, 2026.”

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2012-151, s. 6, was codified at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes as subsection (c1) of G.S. 122C-115 .

Subdivision (9) of Session Laws 2015-245, s. 4, as amended by Session Laws 2018-48, s. 1, and Session Laws 2019-81, s. 12, was codified as subsection (e) of this section, by Session Laws 2019-81, s. 14(a)(8), effective October 1, 2019.

Session Laws 2019-81, s. 14(a)(8) provides, in part, that: “the tag line shall not be codified, and the words ‘under Article 4 of Chapter 108D of the General Statutes’ shall be inserted after the words ‘capitated contracts’.”

This section is printed in the supplement to correct an error in the main volume.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-124, s. 10.26(a), effective July 17, 2004, and expiring July 1, 2005, added the last sentence of subsection (a).

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.32(c), (d), effective July 1, 2007, inserted the second sentence in subsection (a); and added subsection (a1).

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.3, effective August 30, 2007, rewrote subsection (a1).

Session Laws 2011-264, s. 2, effective June 23, 2011, in subsection (a), deleted the former second sentence, which read: “The catchment area of an area authority or a county program shall contain either a minimum population of at least 200,000 or a minimum of six counties,” and added the second and third sentences; rewrote subsection (a1), which formerly read: “Effective July 1, 2007, the Department of Health and Human Services shall reduce by ten percent (10%) annually the administrative funding for LMEs that do not comply with the catchment area requirements of subsection (a) of this section. However, an LME that does not comply with the catchment area requirements because of a change in county membership shall have 12 months from the effective date of the change to comply with subsection (a) of this section”; and added subsection (a2).

Session Laws 2019-81, ss. 12 and 14(a)(8), effective October 1, 2019, added subsection (e). For clarification, see editor’s notes.

Session Laws 2020-88, s. 12(c), effective July 2, 2020, inserted “(5a)” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (e) and in subdivision (e)(1).

Session Laws 2021-62, s. 3.4A(b), effective June 29, 2021, added subsection (f).

Session Laws 2021-62, s. 4.8(d), effective July 1, 2021, deleted “(5a)” preceding “(6)” in subsection (e) and subdivision (e)(1).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Actual Notice of Rehearing Is Required Absent Waiver or Consent to Nonservice. This section and G.S. 153A-77(a) do not exempt any county from the service delivery mandates of Chapter 122C because the latter provision, allowing Boards of Commissioners of counties with populations greater than 425,000 to assume direct control over boards of health, social services, and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, only pertains to the governing structure of a county program and not to the provision of services. See opinion of Attorney General to Eddie S. Winstead III, Esq., Harrington, Ward, Gilleland & Winstead, L.L.P., 2002 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 24 (9/6/02).

§ 122C-115.1. County governance and operation of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services program.

  1. A county may operate a county program for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services as a single county or, pursuant to Article 20 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes, may enter into an interlocal agreement with one or more other counties for the operation of a multicounty program. An interlocal agreement shall provide for the following:
    1. Adoption and administration of the program budget in accordance with Chapter 159 of the General Statutes.
    2. Appointment of a program director to carry out the provisions of G.S. 122C-111 and duties and responsibilities delegated by the county. Except when specifically waived by the Secretary, the program director shall meet all the following minimum qualifications:
      1. Masters degree.
      2. Related experience.
      3. Management experience.
      4. Any other qualifications required under G.S. 122C-120.1 .
    3. Repealed by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.32(e), effective July 1, 2007.
    4. Compliance with the provisions of this Chapter and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary.
    5. Written notification to the Secretary prior to the termination of the interlocal agreement.
    6. Appointment of an advisory committee. The interlocal agreement shall designate a county manager to whom the advisory committee shall report. The interlocal agreement shall also designate the appointing authorities. The appointing authorities shall make appointments that take into account sufficient citizen participation, equitable representation of the disability groups, and equitable representation of participating counties. The membership shall conform to the requirements provided in G.S. 122C-118.1 .
  2. Before establishing a county program pursuant to this section, a county board of commissioners shall hold a public hearing with notice published at least 10 days before the hearing.
  3. A county shall ensure that the county program and the services provided through the county program comply with the provisions of this Chapter and the rules adopted by the Commission and the Secretary.
  4. A county program shall submit on a quarterly basis to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners service delivery reports that assess the quality and availability of public services within the county program’s catchment area. The service delivery reports shall include the types of services delivered, number of recipients served, and services requested but not delivered due to staffing, financial, or other constraints. In addition, at least annually, a progress report shall be submitted to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners. The progress report shall include an assessment of the progress in implementing local service plans, goals, and outcomes. All reports shall be in a format and shall contain any additional information required by the Secretary or board of county commissioners.
  5. Within 30 days of the end of each quarter of the fiscal year, the program director and finance officer of the county program shall present to each member of the board of county commissioners a budgetary statement and balance sheet that details the assets, liabilities, and fund balance of the county program. This information shall be read into the minutes of the meeting at which it is presented. The program director or finance officer of the county program shall provide to the board of county commissioners ad hoc reports as requested by the board of county commissioners.
  6. In a single-county program, the program director shall be appointed by the county manager. In a multicounty program, the program director shall be appointed in accordance with the terms of the interlocal agreement.Except when specifically waived by the Secretary, the program director in a single county program shall meet all the following minimum qualifications:
    1. Masters degree.
    2. Related experience.
    3. Management experience.
    4. Any other qualifications required under G.S. 122C-120.1 .
  7. In a single-county program, an advisory committee shall be appointed by the board of county commissioners and shall report to the county manager. The appointments shall take into account sufficient citizen participation, equitable representation of the disability groups, and equitable representation of participating counties. The membership shall conform to the requirements in G.S. 122C-118.1 . In a multicounty program, the advisory committee shall be appointed in accordance with the terms of the interlocal agreement.
  8. The county program may contract to provide services to governmental or private entities, including Employee Assistance Programs.
  9. Except as otherwise specifically provided, this Chapter applies to counties that provide mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services through a county program. As used in the applicable sections of this Article, the terms “area authority”, “area program”, and “area facility” shall be construed to include “county program”.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.9; 2006-66, s. 10.32(e); 2006-142, s. 4(f), (g), (i), (j); 2012-151, s. 2(b).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

For provisions of Session Laws 2001-437, ss. 3(a) to 3(d), relating to certification of area authorities and county programs to administer and deliver mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, see note at G.S. 122C-10 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.32(e), effective July 1, 2007, repealed subdivision (a)(3).

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4(f), (g), effective July 19, 2006, in subdivision (a)(6) and subsection (g), substituted “The membership” for “At least fifty percent (50%) of the membership,” and substituted “G.S. 122C-118.1” for “G.S. 122C-118.1(b)(1)-(4).”

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4(i), (j), effective January 1, 2007, in subdivision (a)(2), inserted “all” following “director shall meet,” added subdivision (a)(2)d, and made minor stylistic changes; and added the second paragraph in subsection (f).

§ 122C-115.2. LME business plan required; content, process, certification.

  1. Every county, through an area authority or county program, shall provide for the development, review, and approval of an LME business plan for the management and delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. An LME business plan shall provide detailed information regarding how the area authority or county program will meet State standards, laws, and rules for ensuring quality mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including outcome measures for evaluating program effectiveness. The business plan shall be in effect for at least three State fiscal years. The Secretary shall develop a model business plan that illustrates compliance with this section, including specific State standards and rules adopted by the Secretary. The Secretary shall provide each LME with the model business plan to assist the LME in developing its business plan.
  2. Business plans shall include the following:
    1. Description of how the following core administrative functions will be carried out:
      1. Planning. —  Local services plans that identify service gaps and methods for filling the gaps, ensure the availability of an array of services based on consumer needs, provision of core services, equitable service delivery among member counties, and prescribing the efficient and effective use of all funds for targeted services. Local planning shall be an open process involving key stakeholders.
      2. Provider network development. —  Ensuring available, qualified providers to deliver services based on the business plan. Development of new providers and monitoring provider performance and service outcomes. Provider network development shall address consumer choice and fair competition. For the purposes of this section, a “qualified provider” means a provider who meets the provider qualifications as defined by rules adopted by the Secretary.
      3. Service management. —  Implementation of uniform portal process. Service management shall include appropriate level and intensity of services, management of State hospitals/facilities bed days, utilization management, case management, and quality management. If services are provided directly by the area authority or county program, then the plan shall indicate how consumer choice and fair competition in the marketplace is ensured.
      4. Financial management and accountability. —  Carrying out business functions in an efficient and effective manner, cost-sharing, and managing resources dedicated to the public system.
      5. Service monitoring and oversight. —  Ensuring that services provided to consumers and families meet State outcome standards and ensure quality performance by providers in the network.
      6. Evaluation. —  Self-evaluation based on statewide outcome standards and participation in independent evaluation studies.
      7. Collaboration. —  Collaborating with other local service systems in ensuring access and coordination of services at the local level. Collaborating with other area authorities and county programs and the State in planning and ensuring the delivery of services.
      8. Access. —  Ensuring access to core and targeted services.
    2. Description of how the following will be addressed:
      1. Reasonable administrative costs based on uniform State criteria for calculating administrative costs and costs or savings anticipated from consolidation.
      2. Proposed reinvestment of savings toward direct services.
      3. Compliance with the catchment area consolidation plan adopted by the Secretary.
      4. Based on rules adopted by the Secretary, method for calculating county resources to reflect cash and in-kind contributions of the county.
      5. Financial and services accountability and oversight in accordance with State and federal law.
      6. The composition, appointments, selection process, and the process for notifying each board of county commissioners of all appointments made to the area authority board.
      7. The population base of the catchment area to be served.
      8. Use of local funds for the alteration, improvement, and rehabilitation of real property as authorized by and in accordance with G.S. 122C-147 .
      9. The resources available and needed within the catchment area to prevent out-of-community placements and shall include input from the community public agencies.
    3. Other matters determined by the Secretary to be necessary to effectively and efficiently ensure the provision of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services through an area authority or county program.
  3. The county program or area authority proposing the business plan shall submit the proposed plan as approved by the board of county commissioners to the Secretary for review and certification. The Secretary shall review the business plan within 30 days of receipt of the plan. If the business plan meets all of the requirements of State law and standards adopted by the Secretary, then the Secretary shall certify the area authority or county program as a single-county area authority, a single-county program, a multicounty area authority, or a multicounty program. A business plan that demonstrates substantial compliance with the model business plan developed by the Secretary shall be deemed as meeting the requirements of State law and standards adopted by the Secretary. Implementation of the certified plan shall begin within 30 days of certification. If the Secretary determines that changes to the plan are necessary, then the Secretary shall so notify the submitting county program or area authority and the applicable participating boards of county commissioners and shall indicate in the notification the changes that need to be made in order for the proposed program to be certified. If the Secretary determines that a business plan needs substantial changes in order to be certifiable, the Secretary shall provide the LME submitting the plan with detailed information on each area of the plan that is in need of change, the particular State law or standard adopted by the Secretary that has not been met, and instructions or assistance on what changes need to be made in order for the plan to be certifiable. The submitting county program or area authority shall have 30 days from receipt of the Secretary’s notice to make the requested changes and resubmit the amended plan to the Secretary for review. The Secretary shall provide whatever assistance is necessary to resolve outstanding issues. Amendments to the business plan shall be subject to the approval of the participating boards of county commissioners.
  4. Annually, in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary, each area authority and county program submitting a business plan shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with the Secretary for the purpose of ensuring that State funds are used in accordance with priorities expressed in the business plan.
  5. The Secretary may waive any requirements of this section that are inconsistent with or incompatible with contracts entered into between the Department and the area authority for the management responsibilities for the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual or other developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders under a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.9; 2002-164, s. 4.3; 2006-142, s. 4(c); 2007-504, s. 2.1; 2012-151, s. 9(b).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

For provisions of Session Laws 2001-437, ss. 3(a) to 3(d), relating to certification of area authorities and county programs to administer and deliver mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, see note at G.S. 122C-10 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4(c), effective July 19, 2006, substituted “LME business plan” for “Business plan” in the section heading; and in subsection (a), inserted “the” preceding “development” near the beginning of the first sentence, substituted “an LME business plan” for “a business plan” in the first and second sentences, and substituted “information regarding” for “information on” in the second sentence.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 2.1, effective October 1, 2007, added the last two sentences in subsection (a); and in subsection (c), added the fourth and seventh sentences.

§ 122C-115.3. Dissolution of area authority.

  1. Repealed by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 5(a), effective June 12, 2013.
  2. No county shall withdraw from an area authority nor shall an area authority be dissolved without prior approval of the Secretary.

    (b1) The Secretary shall, prior to the date that BH IDD tailored plans begin operating, direct the dissolution of any area authority that does not receive an initial contract to operate a BH IDD tailored plan. The Secretary shall deliver a notice of dissolution to the board of county commissioners of each of the counties in the dissolved LME/MCO.

  3. , (d) Repealed by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 5(a), effective June 12, 2013.

    (e) Any fund balance or risk reserve available to an area authority at the time of its dissolution that is not utilized to pay liabilities shall be transferred to one or more area authorities contracted to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver or a BH IDD tailored plan in all or a portion of the catchment area of the dissolved area authority, as directed by the Department.

    (e1) Effective until the date that BH IDD tailored plans begin operating, if the fund balance transferred from the dissolved area authority under subsection (e) of this section is insufficient to constitute fifteen percent (15%) of the anticipated operational expenses arising from assumption of responsibilities from the dissolved area authority, the Secretary shall guarantee the operational reserves for the area authority assuming the responsibilities under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver until the assuming area authority has reestablished fifteen percent (15%) operational reserves.

    (f), (g) Repealed by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 5(a), effective June 12, 2013.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.9; 2011-102, s. 5; 2011-264, s. 3; 2013-85, s. 5(a)-(c); 2021-62, s. 3.5(a)-(c).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2013-85 provides in its preamble: “Whereas, S.L. 2011-264, as amended by Section 13 of S.L. 2012-151, required the Department of Health and Human Services (Department) to restructure the statewide management of the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders through the statewide expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver; and

“Whereas, a local management entity anaged care organization (LME/MCO) that is awarded a contract to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver was required to maintain fidelity to the Piedmont Behavioral Health (PBH) demonstration model; and

“Whereas, LME/MCOs are acting as Medicaid vendors and the Department must ensure that they are compliant with the provisions of S.L. 2011-264, as amended by Section 13 of S.L. 2012-151, as well as all applicable federal, State, and contractual requirements; Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2011-102, s. 5, effective June 2, 2011, substituted “fund balance” for “budgetary surplus” in the first sentence of subsection (e).

Session Laws 2011-264, s. 3, effective June 23, 2011, in subsection (a), added the next-to-last sentence, and inserted “for other reasons” in the last sentence.

Session Laws 2021-62, s. 3.5(a), (b), (c), effective June 29, 2021, added subsections (b1) and (e1); and rewrote subsection (e).

§ 122C-115.4. Functions of local management entities. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. Local management entities are responsible for the management and oversight of the public system of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services at the community level. An LME shall plan, develop, implement, and monitor services within a specified geographic area to ensure expected outcomes for consumers within available resources.
  2. The primary functions of an LME are designated in this subsection and shall not be conducted by any other entity unless an LME voluntarily enters into a contract with that entity under subsection (c) of this section. The primary functions include all of the following:
    1. Access for all citizens to the core services and administrative functions described in G.S. 122C-2 . In particular, this shall include the implementation of a 24-hour a day, seven-day a week screening, triage, and referral process and a uniform portal of entry into care.
    2. Provider monitoring, technical assistance, capacity development, and quality control. If at anytime the LME has reasonable cause to believe a violation of licensure rules has occurred, the LME shall make a referral to the Division of Health Service Regulation. If at anytime the LME has reasonable cause to believe the abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a client has occurred, the LME shall make a referral to the local Department of Social Services, Child Protective Services Program, or Adult Protective Services Program.
    3. Utilization management, utilization review, and determination of the appropriate level and intensity of services. An LME may participate in the development of person centered plans for any consumer and shall monitor the implementation of person centered plans. An LME shall review and approve person centered plans for consumers who receive State-funded services and shall conduct concurrent reviews of person centered plans for consumers in the LME’s catchment area who receive Medicaid funded services.
    4. Authorization of the utilization of State psychiatric hospitals and other State facilities. Authorization of eligibility determination requests for recipients under a CAP-MR/DD waiver.
    5. Care coordination and quality management. This function involves individual client care decisions at critical treatment junctures to assure clients’ care is coordinated, received when needed, likely to produce good outcomes, and is neither too little nor too much service to achieve the desired results. Care coordination is sometimes referred to as “care management.” Care coordination shall be provided by clinically trained professionals with the authority and skills necessary to determine appropriate diagnosis and treatment, approve treatment and service plans, when necessary to link clients to higher levels of care quickly and efficiently, to facilitate the resolution of disagreements between providers and clinicians, and to consult with providers, clinicians, case managers, and utilization reviewers. Care coordination activities for high-risk/high-cost consumers or consumers at a critical treatment juncture include the following:
      1. Assisting with the development of a single care plan for individual clients, including participating in child and family teams around the development of plans for children and adolescents.
      2. Addressing difficult situations for clients or providers.
      3. Consulting with providers regarding difficult or unusual care situations.
      4. Ensuring that consumers are linked to primary care providers to address the consumer’s physical health needs.
      5. Coordinating client transitions from one service to another.
      6. Conducting customer service interventions.
      7. Assuring clients are given additional, fewer, or different services as client needs increase, lessen, or change.
      8. Interfacing with utilization reviewers and case managers.
      9. Providing leadership on the development and use of communication protocols.
      10. Participating in the development of discharge plans for consumers being discharged from a State facility or other inpatient setting who have not been previously served in the community.
    6. Community collaboration and consumer affairs including a process to protect consumer rights, an appeals process, and support of an effective consumer and family advisory committee.
    7. Financial management and accountability for the use of State and local funds and information management for the delivery of publicly funded services. (7a) Community crisis services planning in accordance with G.S. 122C-2 02.2.
    8. Each LME shall develop a waiting list of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities that are waiting for specific services. The LME shall develop the list in accordance with rules adopted by the Secretary to ensure that waiting list data are collected consistently across LMEs. Each LME shall report this data annually to the Department. The data collected should include numbers of persons who are:
      1. Waiting for residential services.
      2. Potentially eligible for CAP-MRDD.
      3. In need of other services and supports funded from State appropriations to or allocations from the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, including CAP-MRDD.Subject to all applicable State and federal laws and rules established by the Secretary and the Commission, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preempt or supersede the regulatory or licensing authority of other State or local departments or divisions.
  3. Subject to subsection (b) of this section and all applicable State and federal laws and rules established by the Secretary, an LME may contract with a public or private entity for the implementation of LME functions designated under subsection (b) of this section.
  4. Except as provided in G.S. 122C-124.1 and G.S. 122C-125 , the Secretary may neither remove from an LME nor designate another entity as eligible to implement any function enumerated under subsection (b) of this section unless all of the following applies:
    1. The LME fails during the previous consecutive three months to achieve a satisfactory outcome on any of the critical performance measures developed by the Secretary under G.S. 122C-112.1(33).
    2. The Secretary provides focused technical assistance to the LME in the implementation of the function. The assistance shall continue for at least three months or until the LME achieves a satisfactory outcome on the performance measure, whichever occurs first.
    3. If, after three months of receiving technical assistance from the Secretary, the LME still fails to achieve or maintain a satisfactory outcome on the critical performance measure, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with another LME or agency to implement the function on behalf of the LME from which the function has been removed.
  5. Notwithstanding subsection (d) of this section, in the case of serious financial mismanagement or serious regulatory noncompliance, the Secretary may temporarily remove an LME function after consultation with the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services.
  6. The Commission shall adopt rules regarding the following matters:
    1. The definition of a high risk consumer. Until such time as the Commission adopts a rule under this subdivision, a high risk consumer means a person who has been assessed as needing emergent crisis services three or more times in the previous 12 months.
    2. The definition of a high cost consumer. Until such time as the Commission adopts a rule under this subdivision, a high cost consumer means a person whose treatment plan is expected to incur costs in the top twenty percent (20%) of expenditures for all consumers in a disability group.
    3. The notice and procedural requirements for removing one or more LME functions under subsection (d) of this section.
  7. The Commission shall adopt rules to ensure that the needs of members of the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their family members are met by requiring:
    1. Each LME to have at least one trained care coordination person on staff to serve as the point of contact for TRICARE, the North Carolina National Guard’s Integrated Behavioral Health System, the Army Reserve Department of Psychological Health, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, and related organizations to ensure that members of the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their family members have access to State-funded services when they are not eligible for federally funded mental health or substance abuse services.
    2. LME staff members who provide screening, triage, or referral services to receive training to enhance the services provided to members of the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their families. The training required by this subdivision shall include training on at least all of the following:
      1. The number of persons who serve or who have served in the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States in the LME’s catchment area.
      2. The types of mental health and substance abuse disorders that these service personnel and their families may have experienced, including traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, substance use disorders, potential suicide risks, military sexual trauma, and domestic violence.
      3. Appropriate resources to which these service personnel and their families may be referred as needed.

History. 2006-142, s. 4(d); 2007-323, ss. 10.49(l), (hh); 2007-484, ss. 18, 43.7(a)-(c); 2007-504, s. 1.2; 2008-107, s. 10.15(cc); 2009-186, s. 1; 2009-189, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2011-185, s. 6; 2011-291, s. 2.45; 2012-66, s. 2; 2012-83, s. 43; 2017-186, s. 2(nnnnn); 2018-33, s. 6.

Community Support Providers Appeals Process.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(e1)-(e4), as amended by Session Laws 2009-526, s. 2(c) and Session Laws 2009-550, s. 1.1(c), provides: “(e1) For the purpose of expediting the resolution of community support provider appeals and thereby saving State and federal funds that are paid for services that are found to be unnecessary or otherwise ineligible for payment, the Department shall implement on a temporary basis a community support provider appeals process. The process shall be a substitute for informal provider appeals at the Department level and formal provider appeals by the Office of Administrative Hearings. The community support provider appeals process shall apply to a community support services provider:

“(1) Who is aggrieved by a decision of the Department to reduce, deny, recoup, or recover reimbursement for community support services, or to deny, suspend, or revoke a provider agreement to provide community support services.

“(2) Whose endorsement has been withdrawn or whose application for endorsement has been denied by a local management entity.

“(e2) The community support provider appeals process shall be developed and implemented as follows:

“(1) A hearing under this section shall be commenced by filing a petition with the chief hearings clerk of the Department within 30 days of the mailing of the notice by the Department of the action giving rise to the contested case. The petition shall identify the petitioner, be signed by the party or representative of the party, and shall describe the agency action giving rise to the contested case. As used in this section, ‘file or filing’ means to place the paper or item to be filed into the care and custody of the chief hearings clerk of the Department and acceptance thereof by the chief hearings clerk, except that the hearing officer may permit the papers to be filed with the hearing officer, in which event the hearing officer shall note thereon the filing date. The Department shall supply forms for use in these contested cases.

“(2) If there is a timely request for an appeal, the Department shall promptly designate a hearing officer who shall hold an evidentiary hearing. The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing according to applicable federal law and regulations and shall ensure that:

“a. Notice of the hearing is given not less than 15 days before the hearing. The notice shall state the date, hour, and place of the hearing and shall be deemed to have been given on the date that a copy of the notice is mailed, via certified mail, to the address provided by the petitioner in the petition for hearing.

“b. The hearing is held in Wake County, except that the hearing officer may, take testimony and receive evidence by telephone or other electronic means. The petitioner and the petitioner’s legal representative may appear before the hearing officer in Wake County.

“c. Discovery is no more extensive or formal than that required by federal law and regulations applicable to the hearings. Prior to and during the hearing, a provider representative shall have adequate opportunity to examine the provider’s own case file. No later than five days before the date of the hearing, each party to a contested case shall identify each witness that the party intends to call.

“(3) The hearing officer shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations and regulate the conduct of the hearing. The following shall apply to hearings held pursuant to this section:

“a. At the hearing, the parties may present such sworn evidence, law, and regulations as are relevant to the issues in the case.

“b. The petitioner and the respondent agency each have a right to be represented by a person of his choice, including an attorney obtained at the party’s own expense.

“c. The petitioner and the respondent agency shall each have the right to cross-examine witnesses as well as make a closing argument summarizing his view of the case and the law.

“d. The appeal hearing shall be recorded. If a petition for judicial review is filed the Department shall include a copy of the recording of the hearing as part of the official record. The recording of the appeal hearing may be erased or otherwise destroyed 180 days after the final decision is mailed as provided in G.S. 108A-79(i)(5).

“(4) The hearing officer shall decide the case based upon a preponderance of the evidence, giving deference to the demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the agency as provided in G.S. 150B-34(a). The hearing officer shall prepare a proposal for the decision, citing relevant law, regulations, and evidence, which shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency.

“(5) The petitioner and the respondent agency shall have 15 days from the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision to present written arguments in opposition to or in support of the proposal for decision to the designated official of the Department who will make the final decision. If neither written arguments are presented, nor extension of time granted by the final agency decision maker for good cause, within 15 days of the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision, the proposal for decision becomes final. If written arguments are presented, such arguments shall be considered and the final decision shall be rendered. The final decision shall be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition. This time limit may be extended by agreement of the parties or by final agency decision maker, for good cause shown. The final decision shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency. In the absence of a petition for judicial review filed pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, the final decision shall be binding upon the petitioner and the Department.

“(6) A petitioner who is dissatisfied with the final decision of the Department may file, within 30 days of the service of the decision, a petition for judicial review in the Superior Court of Wake County or of the county from which the case arose. The judicial review shall be conducted according to Article 4 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.

“(7) In the event of a conflict between federal law or regulations and State law or regulations, federal law or regulations shall control. This section applies to all petitions that are filed by a Medicaid community support services provider on or after July 1, 2008, and for all Medicaid community support services provider petitions that have been filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings previous to July 1, 2008, but for which a hearing on the merits has not been commenced prior to that date. The requirement that the agency decision must be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition for hearing shall not apply to (i) community support services provider petitions that were filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings or (ii) requests for a hearing under the Department’s informal settlement process prior to the effective date of this act. The Office of Administrative Hearings shall transfer all cases affected by this section to the Department of Health and Human Services within 30 days of the effective date of this section. This act preempts the existing informal appeal process and reconsideration review process at the Department of Health and Human Services and the existing appeal process at the Office of Administrative Hearings with regard to all appeals filed by Medicaid community support services providers under the Medical Assistance program.

“(e3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the Department of Health and Human Services may, pursuant to its statutory authority or federal Medicaid requirements, suspend the endorsement or Medicaid participation of a provider of community support services pending a final agency decision based on a fair hearing of the provider’s appeal filed with the Department under its community support provider appeal process. A provider of community support services whose endorsement, Medicaid participation, or services have been suspended is not entitled to payment during the period the appeal is pending, and the Department shall make no such payment to the provider during that period. If the final agency decision is in favor of the provider, the Department shall remove the suspension, commence payment for provider services, and reimburse the provider for payments withheld during the period of appeal. Contracts between the Department or a local management entity and the provider shall contain a provision indicating the circumstances under which a provider may appeal an agency decision and giving notice of the suspension of payments to the provider while the appeal is pending. This subsection applies to community support provider appeals pending in the Department of Health and Human Services or the Office of Administrative Hearings, as applicable, on and after July 1, 2008.

“(e4) The Department’s community support provider appeals process established under this section shall expire July 1, 2010. The Department shall report to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division on March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, and March 1, 2010, on the effectiveness and efficiency of the community support provider appeals process.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(j), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance, shall adopt a policy reducing the maximum allowable hours for community support services to eight hours per week. This subsection does not apply to community support services offered under a Medicaid managed care, capitated at-risk waiver.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 10.24(a), (b), provided: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall select up to two additional Local Management Entities (LMEs) to implement the capitated 1915 (b)/(c) Medicaid waiver as a demonstration program during the 2010-2011 fiscal year. The waiver program shall include all Medicaid-covered mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. Expansion of the waiver to additional LMEs shall be contingent upon approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“(b) The Department shall conduct an evaluation of the capitated 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid waiver demonstration program sites to determine the programs’ impact on consumers with developmental disabilities. The evaluation shall include a satisfaction survey of consumers. The Department shall consider the impact on ICF/MR facilities included in the waiver to determine and, to the extent possible, minimize potential inconsistencies with the DMA-ICF/MR rate plan and the requirements of G.S. 131E-176 and G.S. 131E-178 without negatively impacting the viability and success of the waiver program. The Department shall consult with stakeholders and evaluate all other waiver options, including the possibility of a waiver without a 1915(b)/(c) combination. The Department shall report to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division no later than April 1, 2012, after which time the Department may expand the capitated 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid waiver to additional LMEs.

“The Department shall not approve any expansion of the Piedmont Behavioral Healthcare LME (PBH) beyond its existing catchment area until after the Department has completed its evaluation and made its report pursuant to this subsection.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 10.24(a), (b) was repealed by Session Laws 2011-102, s. 1.

Session Laws 2011-102, s. 2, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall implement additional capitated 1915(b)(c) Medicaid waivers during the 2011-2012 fiscal year through a Request for Application (RFA) process for LME applicants who prove readiness. The Department shall consult with stakeholders during the approval process. The waiver program shall include all Medicaid-covered mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. Expansion of the waiver is contingent upon approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”

Session Laws 2011-264, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2012-151, s. 13(a) and (b), provides: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall proceed with statewide restructuring of the management responsibilities for the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders through expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. It is the intent of the General Assembly that expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver will be completed by July 1, 2013, and will result in the establishment of a system that is capable of managing all public resources that may become available for mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including federal block grant funds, federal funding for Medicaid and Health Choice, and all other public funding sources. In implementing the restructuring and expansion authorized in this section, the Department shall do all of the following:

“(1) Establish accountability for the development and management of a local system that ensures easy access to care, the availability and delivery of necessary services, and continuity of care for consumers in need of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“(2) Maintain fidelity to the Piedmont Behavioral Health (PBH) demonstration model, a proven system for the operation of all public resources for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“(3) Designate an area authority for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services to assume responsibility for all aspects of Waiver management. The following operational models are acceptable:

“a. Merger model: A single larger LME is formed from the merger of two or more LMEs.

“b. Interlocal agreement among LMEs: A single LME is identified as the leader for all Waiver operations, financial management, and accountability for performance measures.

“(4) Use managed care strategies, including care coordination and utilization management, to reduce the trend of escalating costs in the State Medicaid program while ensuring medically necessary care and deploy a system for the allocation of resources based on the reliable assessment of intensity of need. The Department shall design these strategies to efficiently direct consumers to appropriate services and to ensure that consumers receive no more and no less than the amount of services determined to be medically necessary and at the appropriate funding level.

“(5) As the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver expands statewide, phase out the current CAP-MR/DD Waiver as well as the utilization management functions currently performed by public and private contractors.

“(6) Design the Innovations Waiver in such a way as to serve the maximum number of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities within aggregate funding.

“(7) Require LMEs approved to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver to do all of the following:

“a. Maintain a local presence in order to respond to the unique needs and priorities of localities.

“b. Implement a process for feedback end exchange of information and ideas to ensure communication with consumers, families, providers, and stakeholders regarding disability-specific and general Waiver operations.

“c. Establish and maintain systems for ongoing communication and coordination regarding the care of individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders with other organized systems such as local departments of social services, Community Care of North Carolina, hospitals, school systems, the Department of Juvenile Justice, and other community agencies.

“d. Comply with the following operational requirements:

“1. Maintain disability specific infrastructure and competency to address the clinical, treatment, rehabilitative, habilitative, and support needs of all disabilities covered by the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.

“2. Maintain administrative and clinical functions, including requirements for customer service, quality management, due process, provider network development, information systems, financial reporting, and staffing.

“3. Maintain full accountability for all aspects of Waiver operations and for meeting all contract requirements specified by the Department. The Department shall not require LMEs to subcontract any managed care functions or nonservice activities to other entities. However, LMEs that choose to subcontract managed care functions to other entities will be limited to the following:

“I. Information systems.

“II. Customer service (including call center) operations.

“III. Claims processing.

“IV. Provider, enrollment, credentialing, and monitoring.

“V. Professional services.

“VI. Treatment Plan development.

“VII. Referral to services.

“(b) By August 1, 2011, the Department shall select LMEs that have been assessed to meet minimum criteria for Waiver operations according to the requirements of RFA #2011-261 issued on April 1, 2011.

“(c) The Department shall require LMEs that have not been approved by the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver by January 1, 2013, to merge with or be aligned through an interlocal agreement with an LME that has been approved by the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. If any LME fails to comply with this requirement, or fails to meet performance requirements of an approved contract with the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, the Department shall assign responsibility for management of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver on behalf of the noncompliant LME to an LME that is successfully operating the Waiver and successfully meeting performance requirements of the contract with the Department. Those LMEs approved to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver under an interlocal agreement must have a single LME entity designated as responsible for all aspects of Waiver operations and solely responsible for meeting contract requirements.

“(d) County governments are not financially liable for overspending or cost overruns associated with an area authority’s operation of a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. County governments are not financially liable for overspending or cost overruns of Medicaid services associated with a county program or multicounty program’s operation of a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver beyond the county program or multicounty program’s Medicaid risk reserve and Medicaid fund balance amounts.

“(e) Providers of targeted case management under the CAP-MR/DD Waiver are qualified to provide the 1915(c) service known as Community Guide under the Innovations Waiver. During the first year of assuming responsibility for Waiver operations, LMEs shall offer to contract with providers that were previously approved to provide targeted case management to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities under the CAP-MR/DD Waiver, for the provision of Community Guide services.

“(f) By December 31, 2011, the Department shall determine the feasibility of adding habilitation services to the State Medicaid Plan through the 1915(i) Option as a strategy to address the needs of Medicaid enrollees with IDD who are not enrolled in the Innovations Waiver and are not residing in an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded (ICF-MR facility).

“(g) The Department shall consider the impact on ICF-MR facilities included in the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver to determine and, to the extent possible, minimize potential inconsistencies with the requirements of G.S. 131E-176 and G.S. 131E-178 without negatively impacting the viability and success of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver programs.

“(h) The Department shall discontinue the pilot program to administer the Supports Intensity Scale to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in non-Waiver LMEs.

“(i) The Department shall establish written policies ensuring alignment of objectives and operational coordination of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver and the care of individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders with other organized systems under the auspices of the Department, including Community Care of North Carolina.

“(j) In the development of the budget for the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium and subsequent biennia, the General Assembly shall consider a reinvestment of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the total projected State savings for that biennium from the operation of the 1915(b)/(c) Waiver, for the purpose of expanding the number of consumers served by the Innovations 1915(c) Medicaid Waiver, or for the purpose of expanding other services that are designed to meet the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“(k) By October 1, 2011, the Department, in coordination with the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the Division of Medical Assistance, LMEs, PBH, and with stakeholder input, shall submit to the appropriate Oversight Committee of the General Assembly a strategic plan delineating specific strategies and agency responsibilities for the achievement of the objectives and deadlines set forth in this Act.

“( l ) The Department shall submit status reports to the General Assembly on the restructuring and expansion authorized in this section on January 1, 2012, April 1, 2012, October 1, 2012, February 1, 2013, and October 1, 2013.”

For provisions pertaining to actions by the Secretary to ensure effective management of behavioral health services under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, see G.S. 122C-124.2 , as added by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 2, effective June 12, 2013.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12F.4A(a)-(e), as amended by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, provides: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services shall require local management entities, including local management entities that have been approved to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver (LME/MCOs), to implement clinical integration activities with Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) through Total Care, a collaborative initiative designed to improve and minimize the cost of care for patients who suffer from comorbid mental health or substance abuse and primary care or other chronic conditions.

“(b) The Department shall ensure that, by no later than January 1, 2014, all LME/MCOs submit claims data, including to the extent practical, retrospective claims data and integrated payment and reporting system (IPRS) data, to the CCNC Informatics Center and to the Medicaid Management Information System. Upon receipt of this claims data, CCNC shall provide access to clinical data and care management information within the CCNC Informatics Center to LME/MCOs and authorized behavioral health providers to support (i) treatment, quality assessment, and improvement activities or (ii) coordination of appropriate and effective patient care, treatment, or habilitation.

“(c) The Department, in consultation with CCNC and the LME/MCOs, shall develop quality and performance statistics on the status of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including, but not limited to, variations in total cost of care, clinical outcomes, and access to and utilization of services.

“(d) The Department shall, within available appropriations and as deemed necessary by the Department, expand or alter existing contracts by mutual agreement of all parties to the contract in order to implement the provisions of this section.

“(e) Repealed by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, effective July 1, 2017.”

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(a), repealed amendments to G.S. 112C-115.4(b)(5) provided that House Bill 627, 2007 Regular Session [2007-504] becomes law. Amendments to G.S. 112C-115.4(b)(5) by Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.2, and Session Laws 2007-323, s. 10.49( l ), as amended by 2007-484, s. 43.7(b), are identical.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(b), provides: “In order to ensure accountability for services provided and funds expended for community services, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, shall develop a tiered rate structure to replace the blended rate currently used for community support services. Under the new tiered structure, services that are necessary but do not require the skill, education, or knowledge of a qualified professional should not be paid at the same rate as services provided by qualified skilled professionals. The Department shall not implement the tiered rate structure until 15 days after it has notified the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. The Department shall report on the development of the structure to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services not later than October 1, 2008.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2008’.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 30.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2008-2009 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2008-2009 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 30.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2010’. ”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2010-2011 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 8(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services of the Department of Health and Human Services shall, in conjunction with the Citizen Soldier Support Program, the Governor’s Focus on Servicemembers, Veterans, and Their Families, the North Carolina Division of Veterans Affairs, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, and other appropriate organizations, develop a training curriculum to be targeted at the following types of organizations:

“(1) Crisis workers, including mental health and addiction services staff on mobile crisis teams; screening, triage, and referral (STR) teams; public safety officers; crisis intervention teams (CITs); emergency management technicians (EMTs); disaster and emergency response teams; local sheriffs’ offices; and local Red Cross chapters.

“(2) Veterans service organizations and veterans service officers.

“(3) Professional advocacy and support organizations, including the National Alliance on Mental Illness North Carolina, the Traumatic Brain Injury Association of North Carolina, and other nonprofit organizations that have a mission to serve members of the active duty and reserve components, veteran members of the military, and their families.

“(4) Military chaplains.

“(b) The training curriculum shall include information about the following core issues:

“(1) The types of mental health and substance abuse disorders that service personnel and their families may have experienced, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), military sexual trauma (MST), depression, substance use disorder (SUD), potential suicide risks, or domestic violence.

“(2) Strategies to encourage eligible veterans to enroll in and access services through the VA system, including opportunities to enroll former military members with previously undiagnosed PTSD, MST, TBI, or SUD, and those who left under less than honorable discharges into the VA system, if the reason for the discharge was due to behavioral health problems that arose or were exacerbated through military service.

“(3) Available referral sources through TRICARE, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Military One Source, Army One Source, Defense Centers of Excellence, Deployment Health Clinical Center, the North Carolina National Guard’s Integrated Behavioral Health System, Local Management Entities, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Citizen Services, North Carolina Health Info, Federally Qualified Health Centers, professional advocacy and support services, and other community resources.

“(c) That portion of the training curriculum directed towards crisis workers, professional advocacy and support organizations, and faith communities shall include information about the following:

“(1) The number of North Carolinians who are serving or who have served in the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States.

“(2) Military culture.

“(3) The average number of deployments, length of time in conflict zones, and potential injuries these members may have faced, particularly those who have served recently in Iraq or Afghanistan.

“(4) The potential impact of the deployment cycle on family members and children. This information shall include information about resiliency skills, intervention skills, resources, and community supports, with a focus on the critical role of the faith community in the provision of assistance with needed service, personal support, and, when necessary, grief counseling.

“(5) Early identification of individual or family members with mental health or substance abuse disorders and appropriate referral sources.

“(d) On or before July 1, 2012, the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services shall report on the curriculum developed pursuant to this section to the Joint Legislative Health Care Oversight Committee, the House of Representatives and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Health and Human Services, and the House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, Military, and Veterans Affairs.”

Session Laws 2012-171, ss. 1-3 provide: “1. Qualified provider. — The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall ensure that Critical Access Behavioral Health Agencies (CABHAs) are the only providers of the following Medicaid services: (i) Community Support Team; (ii) Intensive In-Home; and (iii) Child and Adolescent Day Treatment. CABHAs shall provide these services in accordance with all of the following:

“(1) State statutory requirements regulating the provision of mental health and substance abuse services in Chapter 122C of the General Statutes.

“(2) Chapters 21 through 25 and Chapter 27 of Title 10A of the North Carolina Administrative Code.

“(3) Clinical policy requirements specified in Medicaid Clinical Coverage Policy, Section 8, and in the 1915(b) MH/DD/SAS Health Plan Waiver.

“(4) Federal Medicaid policy as outlined in 42 C.F.R. Chapter IV, Subchapter C.

“2. Required services. — Each CABHA shall, at a minimum, provide comprehensive clinical assessment, medication management, outpatient therapy, and at least two of the following listed services within an age and disability-specific continuum:

“(1) Intensive In-Home.

“(2) Community Support Team.

“(3) Child and Adolescent Day Treatment.

“(4) Substance Abuse Intensive Outpatient Program.

“(5) Substance Abuse Comprehensive Outpatient Treatment.

“(6) Child and Adolescent Residential Treatment Level II — Family and Program Type, Level III, or Level IV (provision of multiple residential service levels counts as one service).

“(7) Psychosocial Rehabilitation.

“(8) Assertive Community Treatment Team.

“(9) Multi-Systemic Therapy.

“(10) Partial Hospitalization.

“(11) Substance Abuse Medically Monitored Community Residential Treatment.

“(12) Substance Abuse Non-Medical Community Residential Treatment.

“(13) Outpatient Opioid Treatment.

“(14) Any other mental health or substance abuse service required to be delivered by a CABHA as set forth in the North Carolina State Plan of Medical Assistance as approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) or in a waiver approved by CMS pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1915(b).

“3. Staffing. — In accordance with the North Carolina State Plan of Medical Assistance, the Department shall ensure each CABHA meet the following staffing requirements:

“(1) A medical director who is a medical doctor licensed in North Carolina, enrolled as a provider, and in good standing with the Division of Medical Assistance. The medical director shall provide medical, clinical, and quality management oversight of the agency’s CABHA services described in Section 2 of this act.

“(2) A clinical director who shall be one of the following licensed or certified providers:

“a. Licensed medical doctor.

“b. Licensed psychologist.

“c. Licensed clinical social worker.

“d. Licensed psychological associate.

“e. Licensed professional counselor.

“f. Licensed marriage and family therapist.

“g. Licensed nurse practitioner.

“h. Licensed clinical addiction specialist.

“i. Certified clinical supervisor.

“(3) A quality management/training director who shall have any training or experience in quality management or training.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made subdivision (b)(7a) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 6, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-323, ss. 10.49( l ) and 10.49(hh), effective July 1, 2007, rewrote subdivision (b)(5); and substituted “may neither remove from an LME nor designate another entity as eligible to implement” for “may not remove from an LME” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 18, effective August 30, 2007, substituted “G.S. 122C-124.1” for “G.S. 122C-142.1” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(b), effective July 1, 2007, substituted “Conducting customer” for “Customer” in subdivision (b)(5)f.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.2, as amended by Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(c), effective July 1, 2007, inserted “are designated in this subsection and shall not be conducted by any other entity unless an LME voluntarily enters into a contract with that entity under subsection (c) of this section. The primary functions” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (b); inserted “and administrative functions” in subdivision (b)(1); inserted “fails to adequately document the provision of services, fails to provide required staff training” in subdivision (b)(2); rewrote subdivisions (b)(3) and (b)(5); added the concluding paragraph of subsection (b); rewrote subsection (c); in subsection (d), substituted “G.S. 122C-124.1” for “G.S. 122C-142.1,” substituted “neither” for “not,” and inserted “nor designate another entity as eligible to implement.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15(cc), effective July 1, 2008, inserted “consecutive” in subdivision (d)(1); and substituted “three” for “six” in subdivisions (d)(3) and (d)(4).

Session Laws 2009-186, s. 1, effective July 1, 2009, added subdivision (b)(8).

Session Laws 2009-189, s. 1, effective June 26, 2009, rewrote subdivision (b)(2).

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 6, effective June 20, 2011, added subsection (g).

Session Laws 2011-291, s. 2.45, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in subsection (e).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(nnnnn), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” for “Division of Adult Correction” in subdivision (g)(1).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 6, added subdivision (b)(7a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (g)(1). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-115.4. Functions of local management entities. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. Local management entities are responsible for the management and oversight of the public system of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services at the community level. An LME shall plan, develop, implement, and monitor services within a specified geographic area to ensure expected outcomes for consumers within available resources.
  2. The primary functions of an LME are designated in this subsection and shall not be conducted by any other entity unless an LME voluntarily enters into a contract with that entity under subsection (c) of this section. The primary functions include all of the following:
    1. Access for all citizens to the core services and administrative functions described in G.S. 122C-2 . In particular, this shall include the implementation of a 24-hour a day, seven-day a week screening, triage, and referral process and a uniform portal of entry into care.
    2. Provider monitoring, technical assistance, capacity development, and quality control. If at anytime the LME has reasonable cause to believe a violation of licensure rules has occurred, the LME shall make a referral to the Division of Health Service Regulation. If at anytime the LME has reasonable cause to believe the abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a client has occurred, the LME shall make a referral to the local Department of Social Services, Child Protective Services Program, or Adult Protective Services Program.
    3. Utilization management, utilization review, and determination of the appropriate level and intensity of services. An LME may participate in the development of person centered plans for any consumer and shall monitor the implementation of person centered plans. An LME shall review and approve person centered plans for consumers who receive State-funded services and shall conduct concurrent reviews of person centered plans for consumers in the LME’s catchment area who receive Medicaid funded services.
    4. Authorization of the utilization of State psychiatric hospitals and other State facilities. Authorization of eligibility determination requests for recipients under a CAP-MR/DD waiver.
    5. Care coordination and quality management. This function involves individual client care decisions at critical treatment junctures to assure clients’ care is coordinated, received when needed, likely to produce good outcomes, and is neither too little nor too much service to achieve the desired results. Care coordination is sometimes referred to as “care management.” Care coordination shall be provided by clinically trained professionals with the authority and skills necessary to determine appropriate diagnosis and treatment, approve treatment and service plans, when necessary to link clients to higher levels of care quickly and efficiently, to facilitate the resolution of disagreements between providers and clinicians, and to consult with providers, clinicians, case managers, and utilization reviewers. Care coordination activities for high-risk/high-cost consumers or consumers at a critical treatment juncture include the following:
      1. Assisting with the development of a single care plan for individual clients, including participating in child and family teams around the development of plans for children and adolescents.
      2. Addressing difficult situations for clients or providers.
      3. Consulting with providers regarding difficult or unusual care situations.
      4. Ensuring that consumers are linked to primary care providers to address the consumer’s physical health needs.
      5. Coordinating client transitions from one service to another.
      6. Conducting customer service interventions.
      7. Assuring clients are given additional, fewer, or different services as client needs increase, lessen, or change.
      8. Interfacing with utilization reviewers and case managers.
      9. Providing leadership on the development and use of communication protocols.
      10. Participating in the development of discharge plans for consumers being discharged from a State facility or other inpatient setting who have not been previously served in the community.
    6. Community collaboration and consumer affairs including a process to protect consumer rights, an appeals process, and support of an effective consumer and family advisory committee.
    7. Financial management and accountability for the use of State and local funds and information management for the delivery of publicly funded services. (7a) Community crisis services planning in accordance with G.S. 122C-2 02.2.
    8. Each LME shall develop a waiting list of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities that are waiting for specific services. The LME shall develop the list in accordance with rules adopted by the Secretary to ensure that waiting list data are collected consistently across LMEs. Each LME shall report this data annually to the Department. The data collected should include numbers of persons who are:
      1. Waiting for residential services.
      2. Potentially eligible for CAP-MRDD.
      3. In need of other services and supports funded from State appropriations to or allocations from the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, including CAP-MRDD.Subject to all applicable State and federal laws and rules established by the Secretary and the Commission, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preempt or supersede the regulatory or licensing authority of other State or local departments or divisions.
  3. Subject to subsection (b) of this section and all applicable State and federal laws and rules established by the Secretary, an LME may contract with a public or private entity for the implementation of LME functions designated under subsection (b) of this section.
  4. Except as provided in G.S. 122C-124.1 and G.S. 122C-125 , the Secretary may neither remove from an LME nor designate another entity as eligible to implement any function enumerated under subsection (b) of this section unless all of the following applies:
    1. The LME fails during the previous consecutive three months to achieve a satisfactory outcome on any of the critical performance measures developed by the Secretary under G.S. 122C-112.1(33).
    2. The Secretary provides focused technical assistance to the LME in the implementation of the function. The assistance shall continue for at least three months or until the LME achieves a satisfactory outcome on the performance measure, whichever occurs first.
    3. If, after three months of receiving technical assistance from the Secretary, the LME still fails to achieve or maintain a satisfactory outcome on the critical performance measure, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with another LME or agency to implement the function on behalf of the LME from which the function has been removed.
  5. Notwithstanding subsection (d) of this section, in the case of serious financial mismanagement or serious regulatory noncompliance, the Secretary may temporarily remove an LME function after consultation with the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services.
  6. The Commission shall adopt rules regarding the following matters:
    1. The definition of a high risk consumer. Until such time as the Commission adopts a rule under this subdivision, a high risk consumer means a person who has been assessed as needing emergent crisis services three or more times in the previous 12 months.
    2. The definition of a high cost consumer. Until such time as the Commission adopts a rule under this subdivision, a high cost consumer means a person whose treatment plan is expected to incur costs in the top twenty percent (20%) of expenditures for all consumers in a disability group.
    3. The notice and procedural requirements for removing one or more LME functions under subsection (d) of this section.
  7. The Commission shall adopt rules to ensure that the needs of members of the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their family members are met by requiring:
    1. Each LME to have at least one trained care coordination person on staff to serve as the point of contact for TRICARE, the North Carolina National Guard’s Integrated Behavioral Health System, the Army Reserve Department of Psychological Health, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the Division of Juvenile Justice, and related organizations to ensure that members of the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their family members have access to State-funded services when they are not eligible for federally funded mental health or substance abuse services.
    2. LME staff members who provide screening, triage, or referral services to receive training to enhance the services provided to members of the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, veterans, and their families. The training required by this subdivision shall include training on at least all of the following:
      1. The number of persons who serve or who have served in the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States in the LME’s catchment area.
      2. The types of mental health and substance abuse disorders that these service personnel and their families may have experienced, including traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, substance use disorders, potential suicide risks, military sexual trauma, and domestic violence.
      3. Appropriate resources to which these service personnel and their families may be referred as needed.

History. 2006-142, s. 4(d); 2007-323, ss. 10.49(l), (hh); 2007-484, ss. 18, 43.7(a)-(c); 2007-504, s. 1.2; 2008-107, s. 10.15(cc); 2009-186, s. 1; 2009-189, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2011-185, s. 6; 2011-291, s. 2.45; 2012-66, s. 2; 2012-83, s. 43; 2017-186, s. 2(nnnnn); 2018-33, s. 6; 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z).

Community Support Providers Appeals Process.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(e1)-(e4), as amended by Session Laws 2009-526, s. 2(c) and Session Laws 2009-550, s. 1.1(c), provides: “(e1) For the purpose of expediting the resolution of community support provider appeals and thereby saving State and federal funds that are paid for services that are found to be unnecessary or otherwise ineligible for payment, the Department shall implement on a temporary basis a community support provider appeals process. The process shall be a substitute for informal provider appeals at the Department level and formal provider appeals by the Office of Administrative Hearings. The community support provider appeals process shall apply to a community support services provider:

“(1) Who is aggrieved by a decision of the Department to reduce, deny, recoup, or recover reimbursement for community support services, or to deny, suspend, or revoke a provider agreement to provide community support services.

“(2) Whose endorsement has been withdrawn or whose application for endorsement has been denied by a local management entity.

“(e2) The community support provider appeals process shall be developed and implemented as follows:

“(1) A hearing under this section shall be commenced by filing a petition with the chief hearings clerk of the Department within 30 days of the mailing of the notice by the Department of the action giving rise to the contested case. The petition shall identify the petitioner, be signed by the party or representative of the party, and shall describe the agency action giving rise to the contested case. As used in this section, ‘file or filing’ means to place the paper or item to be filed into the care and custody of the chief hearings clerk of the Department and acceptance thereof by the chief hearings clerk, except that the hearing officer may permit the papers to be filed with the hearing officer, in which event the hearing officer shall note thereon the filing date. The Department shall supply forms for use in these contested cases.

“(2) If there is a timely request for an appeal, the Department shall promptly designate a hearing officer who shall hold an evidentiary hearing. The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing according to applicable federal law and regulations and shall ensure that:

“a. Notice of the hearing is given not less than 15 days before the hearing. The notice shall state the date, hour, and place of the hearing and shall be deemed to have been given on the date that a copy of the notice is mailed, via certified mail, to the address provided by the petitioner in the petition for hearing.

“b. The hearing is held in Wake County, except that the hearing officer may, take testimony and receive evidence by telephone or other electronic means. The petitioner and the petitioner’s legal representative may appear before the hearing officer in Wake County.

“c. Discovery is no more extensive or formal than that required by federal law and regulations applicable to the hearings. Prior to and during the hearing, a provider representative shall have adequate opportunity to examine the provider’s own case file. No later than five days before the date of the hearing, each party to a contested case shall identify each witness that the party intends to call.

“(3) The hearing officer shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations and regulate the conduct of the hearing. The following shall apply to hearings held pursuant to this section:

“a. At the hearing, the parties may present such sworn evidence, law, and regulations as are relevant to the issues in the case.

“b. The petitioner and the respondent agency each have a right to be represented by a person of his choice, including an attorney obtained at the party’s own expense.

“c. The petitioner and the respondent agency shall each have the right to cross-examine witnesses as well as make a closing argument summarizing his view of the case and the law.

“d. The appeal hearing shall be recorded. If a petition for judicial review is filed the Department shall include a copy of the recording of the hearing as part of the official record. The recording of the appeal hearing may be erased or otherwise destroyed 180 days after the final decision is mailed as provided in G.S. 108A-79(i)(5).

“(4) The hearing officer shall decide the case based upon a preponderance of the evidence, giving deference to the demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the agency as provided in G.S. 150B-34(a). The hearing officer shall prepare a proposal for the decision, citing relevant law, regulations, and evidence, which shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency.

“(5) The petitioner and the respondent agency shall have 15 days from the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision to present written arguments in opposition to or in support of the proposal for decision to the designated official of the Department who will make the final decision. If neither written arguments are presented, nor extension of time granted by the final agency decision maker for good cause, within 15 days of the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision, the proposal for decision becomes final. If written arguments are presented, such arguments shall be considered and the final decision shall be rendered. The final decision shall be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition. This time limit may be extended by agreement of the parties or by final agency decision maker, for good cause shown. The final decision shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency. In the absence of a petition for judicial review filed pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, the final decision shall be binding upon the petitioner and the Department.

“(6) A petitioner who is dissatisfied with the final decision of the Department may file, within 30 days of the service of the decision, a petition for judicial review in the Superior Court of Wake County or of the county from which the case arose. The judicial review shall be conducted according to Article 4 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.

“(7) In the event of a conflict between federal law or regulations and State law or regulations, federal law or regulations shall control. This section applies to all petitions that are filed by a Medicaid community support services provider on or after July 1, 2008, and for all Medicaid community support services provider petitions that have been filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings previous to July 1, 2008, but for which a hearing on the merits has not been commenced prior to that date. The requirement that the agency decision must be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition for hearing shall not apply to (i) community support services provider petitions that were filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings or (ii) requests for a hearing under the Department’s informal settlement process prior to the effective date of this act. The Office of Administrative Hearings shall transfer all cases affected by this section to the Department of Health and Human Services within 30 days of the effective date of this section. This act preempts the existing informal appeal process and reconsideration review process at the Department of Health and Human Services and the existing appeal process at the Office of Administrative Hearings with regard to all appeals filed by Medicaid community support services providers under the Medical Assistance program.

“(e3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the Department of Health and Human Services may, pursuant to its statutory authority or federal Medicaid requirements, suspend the endorsement or Medicaid participation of a provider of community support services pending a final agency decision based on a fair hearing of the provider’s appeal filed with the Department under its community support provider appeal process. A provider of community support services whose endorsement, Medicaid participation, or services have been suspended is not entitled to payment during the period the appeal is pending, and the Department shall make no such payment to the provider during that period. If the final agency decision is in favor of the provider, the Department shall remove the suspension, commence payment for provider services, and reimburse the provider for payments withheld during the period of appeal. Contracts between the Department or a local management entity and the provider shall contain a provision indicating the circumstances under which a provider may appeal an agency decision and giving notice of the suspension of payments to the provider while the appeal is pending. This subsection applies to community support provider appeals pending in the Department of Health and Human Services or the Office of Administrative Hearings, as applicable, on and after July 1, 2008.

“(e4) The Department’s community support provider appeals process established under this section shall expire July 1, 2010. The Department shall report to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division on March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, and March 1, 2010, on the effectiveness and efficiency of the community support provider appeals process.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(j), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance, shall adopt a policy reducing the maximum allowable hours for community support services to eight hours per week. This subsection does not apply to community support services offered under a Medicaid managed care, capitated at-risk waiver.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 10.24(a), (b), provided: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall select up to two additional Local Management Entities (LMEs) to implement the capitated 1915 (b)/(c) Medicaid waiver as a demonstration program during the 2010-2011 fiscal year. The waiver program shall include all Medicaid-covered mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. Expansion of the waiver to additional LMEs shall be contingent upon approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“(b) The Department shall conduct an evaluation of the capitated 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid waiver demonstration program sites to determine the programs’ impact on consumers with developmental disabilities. The evaluation shall include a satisfaction survey of consumers. The Department shall consider the impact on ICF/MR facilities included in the waiver to determine and, to the extent possible, minimize potential inconsistencies with the DMA-ICF/MR rate plan and the requirements of G.S. 131E-176 and G.S. 131E-178 without negatively impacting the viability and success of the waiver program. The Department shall consult with stakeholders and evaluate all other waiver options, including the possibility of a waiver without a 1915(b)/(c) combination. The Department shall report to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division no later than April 1, 2012, after which time the Department may expand the capitated 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid waiver to additional LMEs.

“The Department shall not approve any expansion of the Piedmont Behavioral Healthcare LME (PBH) beyond its existing catchment area until after the Department has completed its evaluation and made its report pursuant to this subsection.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 10.24(a), (b) was repealed by Session Laws 2011-102, s. 1.

Session Laws 2011-102, s. 2, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall implement additional capitated 1915(b)(c) Medicaid waivers during the 2011-2012 fiscal year through a Request for Application (RFA) process for LME applicants who prove readiness. The Department shall consult with stakeholders during the approval process. The waiver program shall include all Medicaid-covered mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. Expansion of the waiver is contingent upon approval by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”

Session Laws 2011-264, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2012-151, s. 13(a) and (b), provides: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall proceed with statewide restructuring of the management responsibilities for the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders through expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. It is the intent of the General Assembly that expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver will be completed by July 1, 2013, and will result in the establishment of a system that is capable of managing all public resources that may become available for mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including federal block grant funds, federal funding for Medicaid and Health Choice, and all other public funding sources. In implementing the restructuring and expansion authorized in this section, the Department shall do all of the following:

“(1) Establish accountability for the development and management of a local system that ensures easy access to care, the availability and delivery of necessary services, and continuity of care for consumers in need of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“(2) Maintain fidelity to the Piedmont Behavioral Health (PBH) demonstration model, a proven system for the operation of all public resources for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“(3) Designate an area authority for mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services to assume responsibility for all aspects of Waiver management. The following operational models are acceptable:

“a. Merger model: A single larger LME is formed from the merger of two or more LMEs.

“b. Interlocal agreement among LMEs: A single LME is identified as the leader for all Waiver operations, financial management, and accountability for performance measures.

“(4) Use managed care strategies, including care coordination and utilization management, to reduce the trend of escalating costs in the State Medicaid program while ensuring medically necessary care and deploy a system for the allocation of resources based on the reliable assessment of intensity of need. The Department shall design these strategies to efficiently direct consumers to appropriate services and to ensure that consumers receive no more and no less than the amount of services determined to be medically necessary and at the appropriate funding level.

“(5) As the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver expands statewide, phase out the current CAP-MR/DD Waiver as well as the utilization management functions currently performed by public and private contractors.

“(6) Design the Innovations Waiver in such a way as to serve the maximum number of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities within aggregate funding.

“(7) Require LMEs approved to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver to do all of the following:

“a. Maintain a local presence in order to respond to the unique needs and priorities of localities.

“b. Implement a process for feedback end exchange of information and ideas to ensure communication with consumers, families, providers, and stakeholders regarding disability-specific and general Waiver operations.

“c. Establish and maintain systems for ongoing communication and coordination regarding the care of individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders with other organized systems such as local departments of social services, Community Care of North Carolina, hospitals, school systems, the Department of Juvenile Justice, and other community agencies.

“d. Comply with the following operational requirements:

“1. Maintain disability specific infrastructure and competency to address the clinical, treatment, rehabilitative, habilitative, and support needs of all disabilities covered by the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.

“2. Maintain administrative and clinical functions, including requirements for customer service, quality management, due process, provider network development, information systems, financial reporting, and staffing.

“3. Maintain full accountability for all aspects of Waiver operations and for meeting all contract requirements specified by the Department. The Department shall not require LMEs to subcontract any managed care functions or nonservice activities to other entities. However, LMEs that choose to subcontract managed care functions to other entities will be limited to the following:

“I. Information systems.

“II. Customer service (including call center) operations.

“III. Claims processing.

“IV. Provider, enrollment, credentialing, and monitoring.

“V. Professional services.

“VI. Treatment Plan development.

“VII. Referral to services.

“(b) By August 1, 2011, the Department shall select LMEs that have been assessed to meet minimum criteria for Waiver operations according to the requirements of RFA #2011-261 issued on April 1, 2011.

“(c) The Department shall require LMEs that have not been approved by the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver by January 1, 2013, to merge with or be aligned through an interlocal agreement with an LME that has been approved by the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. If any LME fails to comply with this requirement, or fails to meet performance requirements of an approved contract with the Department to operate a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, the Department shall assign responsibility for management of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver on behalf of the noncompliant LME to an LME that is successfully operating the Waiver and successfully meeting performance requirements of the contract with the Department. Those LMEs approved to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver under an interlocal agreement must have a single LME entity designated as responsible for all aspects of Waiver operations and solely responsible for meeting contract requirements.

“(d) County governments are not financially liable for overspending or cost overruns associated with an area authority’s operation of a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver. County governments are not financially liable for overspending or cost overruns of Medicaid services associated with a county program or multicounty program’s operation of a 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver beyond the county program or multicounty program’s Medicaid risk reserve and Medicaid fund balance amounts.

“(e) Providers of targeted case management under the CAP-MR/DD Waiver are qualified to provide the 1915(c) service known as Community Guide under the Innovations Waiver. During the first year of assuming responsibility for Waiver operations, LMEs shall offer to contract with providers that were previously approved to provide targeted case management to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities under the CAP-MR/DD Waiver, for the provision of Community Guide services.

“(f) By December 31, 2011, the Department shall determine the feasibility of adding habilitation services to the State Medicaid Plan through the 1915(i) Option as a strategy to address the needs of Medicaid enrollees with IDD who are not enrolled in the Innovations Waiver and are not residing in an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded (ICF-MR facility).

“(g) The Department shall consider the impact on ICF-MR facilities included in the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver to determine and, to the extent possible, minimize potential inconsistencies with the requirements of G.S. 131E-176 and G.S. 131E-178 without negatively impacting the viability and success of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver programs.

“(h) The Department shall discontinue the pilot program to administer the Supports Intensity Scale to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in non-Waiver LMEs.

“(i) The Department shall establish written policies ensuring alignment of objectives and operational coordination of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver and the care of individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders with other organized systems under the auspices of the Department, including Community Care of North Carolina.

“(j) In the development of the budget for the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium and subsequent biennia, the General Assembly shall consider a reinvestment of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the total projected State savings for that biennium from the operation of the 1915(b)/(c) Waiver, for the purpose of expanding the number of consumers served by the Innovations 1915(c) Medicaid Waiver, or for the purpose of expanding other services that are designed to meet the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“(k) By October 1, 2011, the Department, in coordination with the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the Division of Medical Assistance, LMEs, PBH, and with stakeholder input, shall submit to the appropriate Oversight Committee of the General Assembly a strategic plan delineating specific strategies and agency responsibilities for the achievement of the objectives and deadlines set forth in this Act.

“( l ) The Department shall submit status reports to the General Assembly on the restructuring and expansion authorized in this section on January 1, 2012, April 1, 2012, October 1, 2012, February 1, 2013, and October 1, 2013.”

For provisions pertaining to actions by the Secretary to ensure effective management of behavioral health services under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver, see G.S. 122C-124.2 , as added by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 2, effective June 12, 2013.

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12F.4A(a)-(e), as amended by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, provides: “(a) The Department of Health and Human Services shall require local management entities, including local management entities that have been approved to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver (LME/MCOs), to implement clinical integration activities with Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) through Total Care, a collaborative initiative designed to improve and minimize the cost of care for patients who suffer from comorbid mental health or substance abuse and primary care or other chronic conditions.

“(b) The Department shall ensure that, by no later than January 1, 2014, all LME/MCOs submit claims data, including to the extent practical, retrospective claims data and integrated payment and reporting system (IPRS) data, to the CCNC Informatics Center and to the Medicaid Management Information System. Upon receipt of this claims data, CCNC shall provide access to clinical data and care management information within the CCNC Informatics Center to LME/MCOs and authorized behavioral health providers to support (i) treatment, quality assessment, and improvement activities or (ii) coordination of appropriate and effective patient care, treatment, or habilitation.

“(c) The Department, in consultation with CCNC and the LME/MCOs, shall develop quality and performance statistics on the status of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, including, but not limited to, variations in total cost of care, clinical outcomes, and access to and utilization of services.

“(d) The Department shall, within available appropriations and as deemed necessary by the Department, expand or alter existing contracts by mutual agreement of all parties to the contract in order to implement the provisions of this section.

“(e) Repealed by Session Laws 2017-57, s. 11F.16, effective July 1, 2017.”

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(a), repealed amendments to G.S. 112C-115.4(b)(5) provided that House Bill 627, 2007 Regular Session [2007-504] becomes law. Amendments to G.S. 112C-115.4(b)(5) by Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.2, and Session Laws 2007-323, s. 10.49( l ), as amended by 2007-484, s. 43.7(b), are identical.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(b), provides: “In order to ensure accountability for services provided and funds expended for community services, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, shall develop a tiered rate structure to replace the blended rate currently used for community support services. Under the new tiered structure, services that are necessary but do not require the skill, education, or knowledge of a qualified professional should not be paid at the same rate as services provided by qualified skilled professionals. The Department shall not implement the tiered rate structure until 15 days after it has notified the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. The Department shall report on the development of the structure to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services not later than October 1, 2008.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2008’.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 30.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2008-2009 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2008-2009 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 30.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2010’. ”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2010-2011 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 32.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 8(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services of the Department of Health and Human Services shall, in conjunction with the Citizen Soldier Support Program, the Governor’s Focus on Servicemembers, Veterans, and Their Families, the North Carolina Division of Veterans Affairs, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, and other appropriate organizations, develop a training curriculum to be targeted at the following types of organizations:

“(1) Crisis workers, including mental health and addiction services staff on mobile crisis teams; screening, triage, and referral (STR) teams; public safety officers; crisis intervention teams (CITs); emergency management technicians (EMTs); disaster and emergency response teams; local sheriffs’ offices; and local Red Cross chapters.

“(2) Veterans service organizations and veterans service officers.

“(3) Professional advocacy and support organizations, including the National Alliance on Mental Illness North Carolina, the Traumatic Brain Injury Association of North Carolina, and other nonprofit organizations that have a mission to serve members of the active duty and reserve components, veteran members of the military, and their families.

“(4) Military chaplains.

“(b) The training curriculum shall include information about the following core issues:

“(1) The types of mental health and substance abuse disorders that service personnel and their families may have experienced, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), military sexual trauma (MST), depression, substance use disorder (SUD), potential suicide risks, or domestic violence.

“(2) Strategies to encourage eligible veterans to enroll in and access services through the VA system, including opportunities to enroll former military members with previously undiagnosed PTSD, MST, TBI, or SUD, and those who left under less than honorable discharges into the VA system, if the reason for the discharge was due to behavioral health problems that arose or were exacerbated through military service.

“(3) Available referral sources through TRICARE, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Military One Source, Army One Source, Defense Centers of Excellence, Deployment Health Clinical Center, the North Carolina National Guard’s Integrated Behavioral Health System, Local Management Entities, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Citizen Services, North Carolina Health Info, Federally Qualified Health Centers, professional advocacy and support services, and other community resources.

“(c) That portion of the training curriculum directed towards crisis workers, professional advocacy and support organizations, and faith communities shall include information about the following:

“(1) The number of North Carolinians who are serving or who have served in the active or reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States.

“(2) Military culture.

“(3) The average number of deployments, length of time in conflict zones, and potential injuries these members may have faced, particularly those who have served recently in Iraq or Afghanistan.

“(4) The potential impact of the deployment cycle on family members and children. This information shall include information about resiliency skills, intervention skills, resources, and community supports, with a focus on the critical role of the faith community in the provision of assistance with needed service, personal support, and, when necessary, grief counseling.

“(5) Early identification of individual or family members with mental health or substance abuse disorders and appropriate referral sources.

“(d) On or before July 1, 2012, the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services shall report on the curriculum developed pursuant to this section to the Joint Legislative Health Care Oversight Committee, the House of Representatives and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Health and Human Services, and the House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, Military, and Veterans Affairs.”

Session Laws 2012-171, ss. 1-3 provide: “1. Qualified provider. — The Department of Health and Human Services (Department) shall ensure that Critical Access Behavioral Health Agencies (CABHAs) are the only providers of the following Medicaid services: (i) Community Support Team; (ii) Intensive In-Home; and (iii) Child and Adolescent Day Treatment. CABHAs shall provide these services in accordance with all of the following:

“(1) State statutory requirements regulating the provision of mental health and substance abuse services in Chapter 122C of the General Statutes.

“(2) Chapters 21 through 25 and Chapter 27 of Title 10A of the North Carolina Administrative Code.

“(3) Clinical policy requirements specified in Medicaid Clinical Coverage Policy, Section 8, and in the 1915(b) MH/DD/SAS Health Plan Waiver.

“(4) Federal Medicaid policy as outlined in 42 C.F.R. Chapter IV, Subchapter C.

“2. Required services. — Each CABHA shall, at a minimum, provide comprehensive clinical assessment, medication management, outpatient therapy, and at least two of the following listed services within an age and disability-specific continuum:

“(1) Intensive In-Home.

“(2) Community Support Team.

“(3) Child and Adolescent Day Treatment.

“(4) Substance Abuse Intensive Outpatient Program.

“(5) Substance Abuse Comprehensive Outpatient Treatment.

“(6) Child and Adolescent Residential Treatment Level II — Family and Program Type, Level III, or Level IV (provision of multiple residential service levels counts as one service).

“(7) Psychosocial Rehabilitation.

“(8) Assertive Community Treatment Team.

“(9) Multi-Systemic Therapy.

“(10) Partial Hospitalization.

“(11) Substance Abuse Medically Monitored Community Residential Treatment.

“(12) Substance Abuse Non-Medical Community Residential Treatment.

“(13) Outpatient Opioid Treatment.

“(14) Any other mental health or substance abuse service required to be delivered by a CABHA as set forth in the North Carolina State Plan of Medical Assistance as approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) or in a waiver approved by CMS pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1915(b).

“3. Staffing. — In accordance with the North Carolina State Plan of Medical Assistance, the Department shall ensure each CABHA meet the following staffing requirements:

“(1) A medical director who is a medical doctor licensed in North Carolina, enrolled as a provider, and in good standing with the Division of Medical Assistance. The medical director shall provide medical, clinical, and quality management oversight of the agency’s CABHA services described in Section 2 of this act.

“(2) A clinical director who shall be one of the following licensed or certified providers:

“a. Licensed medical doctor.

“b. Licensed psychologist.

“c. Licensed clinical social worker.

“d. Licensed psychological associate.

“e. Licensed professional counselor.

“f. Licensed marriage and family therapist.

“g. Licensed nurse practitioner.

“h. Licensed clinical addiction specialist.

“i. Certified clinical supervisor.

“(3) A quality management/training director who shall have any training or experience in quality management or training.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2013.’ ”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.2, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2013-360, s. 38.5, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2017.’ ”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.”

Session Laws 2017-57, s. 39.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made subdivision (b)(7a) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 6, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-323, ss. 10.49( l ) and 10.49(hh), effective July 1, 2007, rewrote subdivision (b)(5); and substituted “may neither remove from an LME nor designate another entity as eligible to implement” for “may not remove from an LME” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 18, effective August 30, 2007, substituted “G.S. 122C-124.1” for “G.S. 122C-142.1” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(b), effective July 1, 2007, substituted “Conducting customer” for “Customer” in subdivision (b)(5)f.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.2, as amended by Session Laws 2007-484, s. 43.7(c), effective July 1, 2007, inserted “are designated in this subsection and shall not be conducted by any other entity unless an LME voluntarily enters into a contract with that entity under subsection (c) of this section. The primary functions” in the introductory paragraph of subsection (b); inserted “and administrative functions” in subdivision (b)(1); inserted “fails to adequately document the provision of services, fails to provide required staff training” in subdivision (b)(2); rewrote subdivisions (b)(3) and (b)(5); added the concluding paragraph of subsection (b); rewrote subsection (c); in subsection (d), substituted “G.S. 122C-124.1” for “G.S. 122C-142.1,” substituted “neither” for “not,” and inserted “nor designate another entity as eligible to implement.”

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15(cc), effective July 1, 2008, inserted “consecutive” in subdivision (d)(1); and substituted “three” for “six” in subdivisions (d)(3) and (d)(4).

Session Laws 2009-186, s. 1, effective July 1, 2009, added subdivision (b)(8).

Session Laws 2009-189, s. 1, effective June 26, 2009, rewrote subdivision (b)(2).

Session Laws 2011-185, s. 6, effective June 20, 2011, added subsection (g).

Session Laws 2011-291, s. 2.45, effective June 24, 2011, substituted “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services” for “Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” in subsection (e).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(nnnnn), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” for “Division of Adult Correction” in subdivision (g)(1).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 6, added subdivision (b)(7a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice” in subdivision (g)(1). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-116. Status of area authority; status of consolidated human services agency.

  1. An area authority is a local political subdivision of the State.
  2. A consolidated human services agency is a department of the county.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 2; 1981, c. 51, ss. 3, 4; c. 539, s. 1; 1983, c. 280; c. 383, s. 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 690, s. 10; 2012-151, s. 2(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1997-7, s. 1, provides that the Secretary of the Department of Human Resources shall dissolve all area mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse authorities that are comprised of three counties at least two of which each have a population of 90,000 or more according to the most recent decennial federal census. Prior to dissolution, the Secretary shall make the necessary and appropriate provisions relating to personnel and other matters, and dealing with the distribution of the assets and liabilities of the area authority. The dissolution shall take effect not later than June 30, 1997. The Secretary shall permit counties that were part of an area authority dissolved pursuant to this act to provide mental health services as a single-county area authority or to align with another single-county or multicounty area authority.

CASE NOTES

Local Political Subdivision. —

North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services is the agency responsible for operating the state’s Medicaid plan; a local political subdivision of the State under G.S. 122C-116(a), is one which has contracted with the NCDHHS to operate a managed care Medicaid program on the state’s behalf. K.C. v. Shipman, 716 F.3d 107, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9536 (4th Cir. 2013).

§ 122C-117. Powers and duties of the area authority. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. The area authority shall do all of the following:
    1. Engage in comprehensive planning, budgeting, implementing, and monitoring of community-based mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    2. Ensure the provision of services to clients in the catchment area, including clients committed to the custody of the Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety.
    3. Determine the needs of the area authority’s clients and coordinate with the Secretary and with the Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety the provision of services to clients through area and State facilities.
    4. Develop plans and budgets for the area authority subject to the approval of the Secretary. The area authority shall submit the approved budget to the board of county commissioners and the county manager and provide quarterly reports on the financial status of the program in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
    5. Assure that the services provided by the county through the area authority meet the rules of the Commission and Secretary.
    6. Comply with federal requirements as a condition of receipt of federal grants.
    7. Appoint an area director in accordance with G.S. 122C-121(d).
    8. Develop and submit to the board of county commissioners for approval the business plan required under G.S. 122C-115.2 . A multicounty area authority shall submit the business plan to each participating board of county commissioners for its approval. The boards of county commissioners of a multicounty area authority shall jointly submit one approved business plan to the Secretary for approval and certification.
    9. Perform public relations and community advocacy functions.
    10. Recommend to the board of county commissioners the creation of local program services.
    11. Submit to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners service delivery reports, on a quarterly basis, that assess the quality and availability of public services within the area authority’s catchment area. The service delivery reports shall include the types of services delivered, number of recipients served, and services requested but not delivered due to staffing, financial, or other constraints. In addition, at least annually, a progress report shall be submitted to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners. The progress report shall include an assessment of the progress in implementing local service plans, goals, and outcomes. All reports shall be in a format and shall contain any additional information required by the Secretary or board of county commissioners.
    12. Comply with this Article and rules adopted by the Secretary for the development and submission of and compliance with the area authority business plan.
    13. Coordinate with Treatment Accountability for Safer Communities for the provision of services to criminal justice clients.
    14. Maintain a 24-hour a day, seven day a week crisis response service. Crisis response shall include telephone and face-to-face capabilities. Crisis phone response shall include triage and referral to appropriate face-to-face crisis providers and shall be initiated within one hour of notification. Crisis services do not require prior authorization but shall be delivered in compliance with appropriate policies and procedures. Crisis services shall be designed for prevention, intervention, and resolution, not merely triage and transfer, and shall be provided in the least restrictive setting possible, consistent with individual and family need and community safety.
    15. An LME that utilizes single stream funding shall, on a biannual basis, report on the allocation of service dollars and allow for public comment at a regularly scheduled LME board of directors meeting.
    16. Before an LME proposes to reduce State funding to HUD group homes and HUD apartments below the original appropriation of State funds, the LME must:
      1. Receive approval of the reduction in funding from the Department, and
      2. Hold a public hearing at an open LME board meeting to receive comment on the reduction in funding.
    17. Have the authority to borrow money with the approval of the Local Government Commission.
    18. Develop and adopt community crisis services plans in accordance with G.S. 122C-202.2 . (a1) The area authority may contract to provide services to governmental or private entities, including Employee Assistance Programs.
  2. The governing unit of the area authority is the area board. All powers, duties, functions, rights, privileges, or immunities conferred on the area authority may be exercised by the area board.
  3. Within 30 days of the end of each quarter of the fiscal year, the area director and finance officer of the area authority shall provide the quarterly report of the area authority to the county finance officer. The county finance officer shall provide the quarterly report to the board of county commissioners at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board. The clerk of the board of commissioners shall notify the area director and the county finance officer if the quarterly report required by this subsection has not been submitted within the required period of time. This information shall be delivered to the county and, at the request of the board of county commissioners, may be presented in person by the area director or the director’s designee.
  4. A multicounty area authority shall provide to each board of county commissioners of participating counties a copy of the area authority’s annual audit. The audit findings shall be presented in a format prescribed by the county and shall be read into the minutes of the meeting at which the audit findings are presented.

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 661; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, ss. 1, 3, 14, 23; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1983, c. 383, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 830, s. 47(d); 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1991, c. 215, s. 1; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 2; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 4(t); 2000-137, s. 4(w); 2001-437, s. 1.10; 2001-487, s. 79.5; 2005-371, s. 2; 2006-142, s. 3(a); 2009-191, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2012-151, s. 9(a); 2017-186, s. 2(ooooo); 2018-33, s. 7.

Cross References.

As to quarterly reports by mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services area authority or county program, see G.S. 153A-453 .

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made subdivision (a)(18) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 7, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-371, s. 2, effective September 8, 2005, added subdivision (a)(14).

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 3(a), effective July 19, 2006, in subsection (c), substituted “the quarterly report of the area authority to the county finance officer” for “to each member of the board of county commissioners the quarterly report of the area authority,” and inserted the second and third sentences.

Session Laws 2009-191, s. 1, effective July 1, 2009, added subdivisions (a)(15) and (16).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ooooo), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” in subdivisions (a)(2) and (a)(3).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 7, added subdivision (a)(18). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), in subdivisions (a)(2) and (a)(3), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice.” For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-117. Powers and duties of the area authority. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. The area authority shall do all of the following:
    1. Engage in comprehensive planning, budgeting, implementing, and monitoring of community-based mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.
    2. Ensure the provision of services to clients in the catchment area, including clients committed to the custody of the Division of Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety.
    3. Determine the needs of the area authority’s clients and coordinate with the Secretary and with the Division of Juvenile Justice  of the Department of Public Safety the provision of services to clients through area and State facilities.
    4. Develop plans and budgets for the area authority subject to the approval of the Secretary. The area authority shall submit the approved budget to the board of county commissioners and the county manager and provide quarterly reports on the financial status of the program in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
    5. Assure that the services provided by the county through the area authority meet the rules of the Commission and Secretary.
    6. Comply with federal requirements as a condition of receipt of federal grants.
    7. Appoint an area director in accordance with G.S. 122C-121(d).
    8. Develop and submit to the board of county commissioners for approval the business plan required under G.S. 122C-115.2 . A multicounty area authority shall submit the business plan to each participating board of county commissioners for its approval. The boards of county commissioners of a multicounty area authority shall jointly submit one approved business plan to the Secretary for approval and certification.
    9. Perform public relations and community advocacy functions.
    10. Recommend to the board of county commissioners the creation of local program services.
    11. Submit to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners service delivery reports, on a quarterly basis, that assess the quality and availability of public services within the area authority’s catchment area. The service delivery reports shall include the types of services delivered, number of recipients served, and services requested but not delivered due to staffing, financial, or other constraints. In addition, at least annually, a progress report shall be submitted to the Secretary and the board of county commissioners. The progress report shall include an assessment of the progress in implementing local service plans, goals, and outcomes. All reports shall be in a format and shall contain any additional information required by the Secretary or board of county commissioners.
    12. Comply with this Article and rules adopted by the Secretary for the development and submission of and compliance with the area authority business plan.
    13. Coordinate with Treatment Accountability for Safer Communities for the provision of services to criminal justice clients.
    14. Maintain a 24-hour a day, seven day a week crisis response service. Crisis response shall include telephone and face-to-face capabilities. Crisis phone response shall include triage and referral to appropriate face-to-face crisis providers and shall be initiated within one hour of notification. Crisis services do not require prior authorization but shall be delivered in compliance with appropriate policies and procedures. Crisis services shall be designed for prevention, intervention, and resolution, not merely triage and transfer, and shall be provided in the least restrictive setting possible, consistent with individual and family need and community safety.
    15. An LME that utilizes single stream funding shall, on a biannual basis, report on the allocation of service dollars and allow for public comment at a regularly scheduled LME board of directors meeting.
    16. Before an LME proposes to reduce State funding to HUD group homes and HUD apartments below the original appropriation of State funds, the LME must:
      1. Receive approval of the reduction in funding from the Department, and
      2. Hold a public hearing at an open LME board meeting to receive comment on the reduction in funding.
    17. Have the authority to borrow money with the approval of the Local Government Commission.
    18. Develop and adopt community crisis services plans in accordance with G.S. 122C-202.2 . (a1) The area authority may contract to provide services to governmental or private entities, including Employee Assistance Programs.
  2. The governing unit of the area authority is the area board. All powers, duties, functions, rights, privileges, or immunities conferred on the area authority may be exercised by the area board.
  3. Within 30 days of the end of each quarter of the fiscal year, the area director and finance officer of the area authority shall provide the quarterly report of the area authority to the county finance officer. The county finance officer shall provide the quarterly report to the board of county commissioners at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board. The clerk of the board of commissioners shall notify the area director and the county finance officer if the quarterly report required by this subsection has not been submitted within the required period of time. This information shall be delivered to the county and, at the request of the board of county commissioners, may be presented in person by the area director or the director’s designee.
  4. A multicounty area authority shall provide to each board of county commissioners of participating counties a copy of the area authority’s annual audit. The audit findings shall be presented in a format prescribed by the county and shall be read into the minutes of the meeting at which the audit findings are presented.

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 661; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, ss. 1, 3, 14, 23; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1983, c. 383, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 830, s. 47(d); 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1991, c. 215, s. 1; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 2; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 4(t); 2000-137, s. 4(w); 2001-437, s. 1.10; 2001-487, s. 79.5; 2005-371, s. 2; 2006-142, s. 3(a); 2009-191, s. 1; 2011-145, s. 19.1(l); 2012-151, s. 9(a); 2017-186, s. 2(ooooo); 2018-33, s. 7; 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z).

Cross References.

As to quarterly reports by mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services area authority or county program, see G.S. 153A-453 .

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made subdivision (a)(18) of this section, as added by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 7, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-371, s. 2, effective September 8, 2005, added subdivision (a)(14).

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 3(a), effective July 19, 2006, in subsection (c), substituted “the quarterly report of the area authority to the county finance officer” for “to each member of the board of county commissioners the quarterly report of the area authority,” and inserted the second and third sentences.

Session Laws 2009-191, s. 1, effective July 1, 2009, added subdivisions (a)(15) and (16).

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ooooo), effective December 1, 2017, substituted “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and” for “Division of” in subdivisions (a)(2) and (a)(3).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 7, added subdivision (a)(18). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(z), in subdivisions (a)(2) and (a)(3), substituted “Division of Juvenile Justice” for “Juvenile Justice Section of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice.” For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-118. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.11, effective July 1, 2002.

§ 122C-118.1. Structure of area board.

  1. An area board shall have no fewer than 11 and no more than 21 voting members. The board of county commissioners, or the boards of county commissioners within the area, shall appoint members consistent with the requirements provided in subsection (b) of this section. The process for appointing members shall ensure participation from each of the constituent counties of a multicounty area authority. If the board or boards fail to comply with the requirements of subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary shall appoint the unrepresented category. The boards of county commissioners within a multicounty area with a catchment population of at least 1,250,000 shall have the option to appoint members of the area board in a manner or with a composition other than as required by this section by each county adopting a resolution to that effect and receiving written approval from the Secretary. A member of the board may be removed with or without cause by the initial appointing authority. The area board may declare vacant the office of an appointed member who does not attend three consecutive scheduled meetings without justifiable excuse. The chair of the area board shall notify the appropriate appointing authority of any vacancy. Vacancies on the board shall be filled by the initial appointing authority before the end of the term of the vacated seat or within 90 days of the vacancy, whichever occurs first, and the appointments shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term.
  2. Within the maximum membership provided in  subsection (a) of this section, the membership of the area board shall reside within the catchment area and be composed as follows:
    1. At least one member who is a current county commissioner.
    2. The chair of the local Consumer and Family Advisory Committee (CFAC) or the chair’s designee.
    3. At least one family member of the local CFAC, as recommended by the local CFAC, representing the interests of the following:
      1. Individuals with mental illness.
      2. Individuals in recovery from addiction.
      3. Individuals with intellectual or other developmental disabilities.
    4. At least one openly declared consumer member of the local CFAC, as recommended by the local CFAC, representing the interests of the following:
      1. Individuals with mental illness.
      2. Individuals with intellectual or other developmental disabilities.
      3. Individuals in recovery from addiction.
    5. An individual with health care expertise and experience in the fields of mental health, intellectual or other developmental disabilities, or substance abuse services.
    6. An individual with health care administration expertise consistent with the scale and nature of the managed care organization.
    7. An individual with financial expertise consistent with the scale and nature of the managed care organization.
    8. An individual with insurance expertise consistent with the scale and nature of the managed care organization.
    9. An individual with social services expertise and experience in the fields of mental health, intellectual or other developmental disabilities, or substance abuse services.
    10. An attorney with health care expertise.
    11. A member who represents the general public and who is not employed by or affiliated with the Department of Health and Human Services, as appointed by the Secretary.
    12. The President of the LME/MCO Provider Council or the President’s designee to serve as a nonvoting member who shall participate only in Board activities that are open to the public.
    13. An administrator of a hospital providing mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse emergency services to serve as a nonvoting member who shall participate only in Board activities that are open to the public.Except as provided in subdivisions (12) and (13) of this subsection, an individual that contracts with a local management entity (LME) for the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services may not serve on the board of the LME for the period during which the contract for services is in effect. No person registered as a lobbyist under Chapter 120C of the General Statutes shall be appointed to or serve on an area authority board. Of the members described in subdivisions (2) through (4) of this subsection, the boards of county commissioners shall ensure there is at least one member representing the interest of each of the following: (i) individuals with mental illness, (ii) individuals with intellectual or other developmental disabilities, and (iii) individuals in recovery from addiction.
  3. The board of county commissioners may elect to appoint a member of the area authority board to fill concurrently no more than two categories of membership if the member has the qualifications or attributes of the two categories of membership.
  4. Any member of an area board who is a county commissioner serves on the board in an ex officio capacity at the pleasure of the initial appointing authority, for a term not to exceed the earlier of three years or the member’s service as a county commissioner. Any member of an area board who is a county manager serves on the board at the pleasure of the initial appointing authority, for a term not to exceed the earlier of three years or the duration of the member’s employment as a county manager. The terms of members on the area board shall be for three years, except that upon the initial formation of an area board in compliance with subsection (a) of this section, one-third shall be appointed for one year, one-third for two years, and all remaining members for three years. Members shall not be appointed for more than three consecutive terms.
  5. Upon request, the board shall provide information pertaining to the membership of the board that is a public record under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
  6. An area authority that adds one or more counties to its existing catchment area under G.S. 122C-115(c1) shall ensure that the expanded catchment area is represented through membership on the area board, with or without adding area board members under this section, as provided in G.S. 122C-118.1(a).

History. 2001-437, s. 1.11(b); 2002-159, s. 40(a); 2006-142, s. 4(e); 2007-504, s. 1.4; 2010-31, s. 10.7; 2012-151, s. 3(a); 2013-85, ss. 6, 7; 2017-6, s. 3; 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b), 6.1.

Re-recodification; Technical and Conforming Changes.

Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, provides, in part: “The Revisor of Statutes shall recodify Chapter 138A of the General Statutes, Chapter 120C of the General Statutes, as well as Chapter 163 of the General Statutes, as amended by this act, into a new Chapter 163A of the General Statutes to be entitled ‘Elections and Ethics Enforcement Act,’ as enacted by Section 4 of this act. The Revisor may also recodify into the new Chapter 163A of the General Statutes other existing statutory laws relating to elections and ethics enforcement that are located elsewhere in the General Statutes as the Revisor deems appropriate.” The Revisor was further authorized to make technical and conforming changes to catchlines, internal citations, and other references throughout the General Statutes to effectuate this recodification. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor substituted “Article 8 of Chapter 163A” for “Chapter 120C” in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2018-146, ss. 3.1(a), (b) and 6.1, repealed Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3, and authorized the Revisor of Statutes to re-recodify Chapter 163A into Chapters 163, 138A, and 120C and to revert the changes made by the Revisor pursuant to Session Laws 2017-6, s. 3. Pursuant to this authority, the Revisor of Statutes reverted the change to the reference in subsection (b).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.4, applicable to appointments made on and after October 1, 2007, deleted “and serving a catchment area with a population of more than 500,000” following “counties” in the second sentence in subsection (a); in subsection (b), inserted “Except as otherwise provided in this subsection” at the beginning of the introductory paragraph, and added the concluding paragraph.

Session Laws 2010-31, s. 10.7, effective July 1, 2010, in subsection (d), added “at the pleasure of the initial appointing authority, for a term not to exceed the member’s service as a county commissioner” in the first sentence, added the second sentence, deleted the former second sentence, which read: “The terms of county commissioners on an area board are concurrent with their terms as county commissioners,” in the third sentence, inserted “other than county commissioners and county managers,” and added the last sentence.

§ 122C-118.2. Establishment of county commissioner advisory board.

  1. There is established a county commissioner advisory board for each catchment area, consisting of one county commissioner from each county in the catchment area, designated by the board of commissioners of each county. The county commissioner advisory board shall meet on a regular basis, and its duties shall include serving as the chief advisory board to the area authority and to the director of the area authority on matters pertaining to the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual or other developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders in the catchment area. The county commissioner advisory board serves in an advisory capacity only to the area authority, and its duties do not include authority over budgeting, personnel matters, governance, or policymaking of the area authority.
  2. Each board of commissioners within the catchment area shall designate from its members the commissioner to serve on the county commissioner advisory board. Each board of commissioners may determine the manner of designation, the term of service, and the conditions under which its designee will serve on the county commissioner advisory board.

History. 2013-85, s. 8.

§ 122C-119. Organization of area board.

  1. The area board shall meet at least six times per year.
  2. Meetings shall be called by the area board chairman or by three or more members of the board after notifying the area board chairman in writing.
  3. Members of the area board elect the board’s chairman. The term of office of the area board chairman shall be one year. A county commissioner area board member may serve as the area board chairman.
  4. The area board shall establish a finance committee that shall meet at least six times per year to review the financial strength of the area program. The finance committee shall have a minimum of three members, two of whom have expertise in budgeting and fiscal control. The member of the area board who is the county finance officer or individual with financial expertise shall serve as an ex officio member. All other finance officers of participating counties in a multicounty area authority may serve as ex officio members. If the area board so chooses, the entire area board may function as the finance committee; however, its required meetings as a finance committee shall be distinct from its meetings as an area board.

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 455; c. 476, s. 133; c. 1355; 1975, c. 400, ss. 1-4; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, ss. 6, 23; c. 455; 1981, c. 52; 1983, c. 6; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 4; 2001-437, s. 1.11(c).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

§ 122C-119.1. Area Authority board members’ training.

All members of the governing body for an area authority shall receive initial orientation on board members’ responsibilities and annual training provided by the Department which shall include fiscal management, budget development, and fiscal accountability. A member’s refusal to be trained shall be grounds for removal from the board.

History. 1995, c. 507, s. 23.3; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 5; 2012-151, s. 4(a).

§ 122C-120. Compensation of area board members.

  1. Area board members may receive as compensation for their services per diem and a subsistence allowance for each day during which they are engaged in the official business of the area board. The amount of the per diem and subsistence allowances shall be established by the area board. The amount of per diem allowance shall not exceed fifty dollars ($50.00). Reimbursement of subsistence expenses shall be at the rates allowed to State officers and employees under G.S. 138-6(a)(3).
  2. Area board members may be reimbursed for all necessary travel expenses and registration fees in amounts fixed by the board.

History. 1979, c. 358, s. 28; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2000-67, s. 11.18.

§ 122C-120.1. Job classifications; director and finance officer.

  1. The Office of State Human Resources shall develop a job classification for director of an area authority or county program that reflects the skills required of an individual operating a local management entity. The Office of State Human Resources shall also review the job classifications for area authority and county program finance officers to determine whether they reflect the skills necessary to manage the finances of a local management entity. The Commission shall adopt a job classification for director and any new or revised job classifications for finance officers no later than December 31, 2006.
  2. The job classifications developed under subsection (a) of this section shall apply to persons newly hired on or after January 1, 2007.

History. 2006-142, s. 4(h); 2013-382, s. 9.1(c).

§ 122C-121. Area director.

  1. The area director is an employee of the area board, shall serve at the pleasure of the board, and shall be appointed in accordance with G.S. 122C-117(7). As used in this subsection, “employee” means an individual and does not include a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability corporation, or any other business association.

    (a1) The area board shall establish the area director’s salary under Article 3 of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes. Notwithstanding G.S. 126-9(b), an area director may be paid a salary that is in excess of the salary ranges established by the State Human Resources Commission. Any salary that is higher than the maximum of the applicable salary range shall be supported by documentation of comparable salaries in comparable operations within the region and shall also include the specific amount the board proposes to pay the director. The area board shall not authorize any salary adjustment that is above the normal allowable salary range without obtaining prior approval from the Director of the Office of State Human Resources.

    (a2) The area board shall not provide the director with any benefits that are not also provided by the area board to all permanent employees of the area program, except that the area board may, in its discretion, offer severance benefits, relocation expenses, or both, to an applicant for the position of director as an incentive for the applicant to accept an offer of employment. The director shall be reimbursed only for allowable employment-related expenses at the same rate and in the same manner as other employees of the area program.

  2. The area board shall evaluate annually the area director for performance based on criteria established by the Secretary and the area board. In conducting the evaluation, the area board shall consider comments from the board of county commissioners.
  3. The area director is the administrative head of the area program. In addition to the duties under G.S. 122C-111 , the area director shall:
    1. Appoint, supervise, and terminate area program staff.
    2. Administer area authority services.
    3. Develop the budget of the area authority for review by the area board.
    4. Provide information and advice to the board of county commissioners through the county manager.
    5. Act as liaison between the area authority and the Department.
  4. Except when specifically waived by the Secretary, the area director shall meet all the following minimum qualifications:
    1. Masters degree.
    2. Related experience.
    3. Management experience.
    4. Any other qualifications required under G.S. 122C-120.1 .

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 14; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2001-437, s. 1.12; 2006-142, s. 4(k); 2007-323, s. 6.20(a); 2012-151, s. 11(c); 2013-339, s. 1; 2013-382, s. 9.1(c).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-323, s. 6.20(a), effective July 31, 2007, in subsection (a), inserted “shall serve at the pleasure of the board” in the first sentence and substituted the present second sentence for the former, which read: “The area director is the administrative head of the area program”; added subsections (a1) and (a2); in subsection (c), added the first sentence in the introductory paragraph, and substituted “Appoint, supervise, and terminate” for “Appoint and supervise” at the beginning of subdivision (c)(1).

§ 122C-122. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2012-151, s. 12(a), effective July 12, 2012.

History. 1977, c. 679, s. 7; c. 725, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 26; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 550, s. 26; repealed by 2012-151, s. 12(a), effective July 12, 2012.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2012-151, s. 12(e), provides: “In order to achieve continuity of care and services, any successor guardian shall make diligent efforts to continue existing contracts entered into under the authority of G.S. 122C-122 where consistent with the best interest of the ward as required by Chapter 35A of the General Statutes.”

Former § 122C-122 pertained to public guardians.

§ 122C-123. Other agency responsibility.

Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S. 122C-112(a)(10), G.S. 122C-117(a)(1), G.S. 122C-127 , and G.S. 122C-131 , other agencies of the Department, other State agencies, and other local agencies shall continue responsibility for services they provide for persons with developmental disabilities.

History. 1987, c. 830, s. 47(e); 1989, c. 625, s. 14; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 690, s. 11.

§ 122C-123.1. Area authority reimbursement to State for disallowed expenditures.

Any funds or part thereof of an area authority that are transferred by the area authority to any entity including a firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint stock association, agency, or nonprofit private foundation shall be subject to reimbursement by the area authority to the State when expenditures of the area authority are disallowed pursuant to a State or federal audit.

History. 1999-237, s. 11.41.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1999-237, s. 11.41, originally enacted this section as G.S. 122C-123 A. It was subsequently redesignated as G.S. 122C-123.1 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

§ 122C-124. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.13(a), effective July 1, 2002.

§ 122C-124.1. Actions by the Secretary when area authority or county program is not providing minimally adequate services.

  1. Notice of Likelihood of Action. —  When the Secretary determines that there is a likelihood of suspension of funding, assumption of service delivery or management functions, or appointment of a caretaker board under this section within the ensuing 60 days, the Secretary shall so notify in writing the area authority board or the county program and the board of county commissioners of the area authority or county program. The notice shall state the particular deficiencies in program services or administration that must be remedied to avoid action by the Secretary under this section. The area authority board or county program shall have 60 days from the date it receives notice under this subsection to take remedial action to correct the deficiencies. The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to the area authority or county program in remedying deficiencies.
  2. Suspension of Funding; Assumption of Service Delivery or Management Functions. —  If the Secretary determines that a county, through an area authority or county program, is not providing minimally adequate services to persons in need in a timely manner, or fails to demonstrate reasonable efforts to do so, the Secretary, after providing written notification of the Secretary’s intent to the area authority or county program and to the board of county commissioners of the area authority or county program, and after providing the area authority or county program and the boards of county commissioners of the area authority or county program an opportunity to be heard, may:
    1. Withhold funding for the particular service or services in question from the area authority or county program and ensure the provision of these services through contracts with public or private agencies or by direct operation by the Department.Upon suspension of funding, the Department shall direct the development and oversee implementation of a corrective plan of action and provide notification to the area authority or county program and the board of county commissioners of the area authority or county program of any ongoing concerns or problems with the area authority’s or county program’s finances or delivery of services.
    2. Assume control of the particular service or management functions in question or of the area authority or county program and appoint an administrator to exercise the powers assumed. This assumption of control shall have the effect of divesting the area authority or county program of its powers in G.S. 122C-115.1 and G.S. 122C-117 and all other service delivery powers conferred on the area authority or county program by law as they pertain to this service or management function. County funding of the area authority or county program shall continue when the State has assumed control of the catchment area or of the area authority or county program. At no time after the State has assumed this control shall a county withdraw funds previously obligated or appropriated to the area authority or county program.Upon assumption of control of service delivery or management functions, the Department shall, in conjunction with the area authority or county program, develop and implement a corrective plan of action and provide notification to the area authority or county program and the board of county commissioners of the area authority or county program of the plan. The Department shall also keep the area authority board and the board of county commissioners informed of any ongoing concerns or problems with the delivery of services.
  3. Appointment of Caretaker Administrator. —  In the event that a county, through an area authority or county program, fails to comply with the corrective plan of action required when funding is suspended or when the State assumes control of service delivery or management functions, the Secretary, after providing written notification of the Secretary’s intent to the area authority or county program and the applicable participating boards of county commissioners of the area authority or county program, shall appoint a caretaker administrator, a caretaker board of directors, or both.The Secretary may assign any of the powers and duties of the area director or program director or of the area authority board or board of county commissioners of the area authority or county program pertaining to the operation of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services to the caretaker board or to the caretaker administrator as it deems necessary and appropriate to continue to provide direct services to clients, including the powers as to the adoption of budgets, expenditures of money, and all other financial powers conferred on the area authority or county program by law pertaining to the operation of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services. County funding of the area authority or county program shall continue when the State has assumed control of the financial affairs of the program. At no time after the State has assumed this control shall a county withdraw funds previously obligated or appropriated to the area authority or county program. The caretaker administrator and the caretaker board shall perform all of these powers and duties. The Secretary may terminate the area director or program director when it appoints a caretaker administrator. Chapter 150B of the General Statutes shall apply to the decision to terminate the area director or program director. Neither party to any such contract shall be entitled to damages. After a caretaker board has been appointed, the General Assembly shall consider, at its next regular session, the future governance of the identified area authority or county program.

History. 2001-437, s. 1.13(b); 2008-107, s. 10.15(ee).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15(ee), effective July 1, 2008, deleted “in accordance with rules adopted by the Secretary or the Commission” following “minimally adequate services” in the introductory language of subsection (b).

§ 122C-124.2. Actions by the Secretary to ensure effective management of behavioral health services under the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.

  1. For all local management entity/managed care organizations, the Secretary shall certify whether the LME/MCO is in compliance or is not in compliance with all requirements of subdivisions (1) through (3) of subsection (b) of this section. The Secretary’s certification shall be made every six months beginning August 1, 2013. In order to ensure accurate evaluation of administrative, operational, actuarial and financial components, and overall performance of the LME/MCO, the Secretary’s certification shall be based upon an internal and external assessment made by an independent external review agency in accordance with applicable federal and State laws and regulations. Beginning on February 1, 2014, and for all subsequent assessments for certification, the independent review will be made by an External Quality Review Organization approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and in accordance with applicable federal and State laws and regulations.
  2. The Secretary’s certification under subsection (a) of this section shall be in writing and signed by the Secretary and shall contain a clear and unequivocal statement that the Secretary has determined the local management entity/managed care organization to be in compliance with all of the following requirements:
    1. The LME/MCO has made adequate provision against the risk of insolvency and either (i) is not required to be under a corrective action plan in accordance with G.S. 122C-125.2 or (ii) is in compliance with a corrective action plan required under G.S. 122C-125.2 .
    2. The LME/MCO is making timely provider payments. The Secretary shall certify that an LME/MCO is making timely provider payments if there are no consecutive three-month periods during which the LME/MCO paid less than ninety percent (90%) of clean claims for covered services within the 30-day period following the LME/MCO’s receipt of these claims during that three-month period. As used in this subdivision, a “clean claim” is a claim that can be processed without obtaining additional information from the provider of the service or from a third party. The term includes a claim with errors originating in the LME/MCO’s claims system. The term does not include a claim from a provider who is under investigation by a governmental agency for fraud or abuse or a claim under review for medical necessity.
    3. The LME/MCO is exchanging billing, payment, and transaction information with the Department and providers in a manner that complies with all applicable federal standards, including all of the following:
      1. Standards for information transactions and data elements specified in 42 U.S.C. § 1302d-2 of the Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as from time to time amended.
      2. Standards for health care claims or equivalent encounter information transactions specified in HIPAA regulations in 45 C.F.R. § 162.1102, as from time to time amended.
      3. Implementation specifications for Electronic Data Interchange standards published and maintained by the Accredited Standards Committee (ASC X12) and referenced in HIPAA regulations in 45 C.F.R. § 162.920, as from time to time amended.
  3. If the Secretary does not provide a local management entity/managed care organization with the certification of compliance required by this section based upon the LME/MCO’s failure to comply with any of the requirements specified in subdivisions (1) through (3) of subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary shall do the following:
    1. Prepare a written notice informing the LME/MCO of the provisions of subdivision (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (b) of this section with which the LME/MCO is deemed not to be in compliance and the reasons for the determination of noncompliance.
    2. Cause the notice of the noncompliance to be delivered to the LME/MCO.
    3. Not later than 10 days after the Secretary’s notice of noncompliance is provided to the LME/MCO, assign the Contract of the noncompliant LME/MCO to a compliant LME/MCO.
    4. Oversee the transfer of the operations and contracts from the noncompliant LME/MCO to the compliant LME/MCO in accordance with the provisions in subsection (e) of this section.
  4. If, at any time, in the Secretary’s determination, a local management entity/managed care organization is not in compliance with a requirement of the Contract other than those specified in subdivisions (1) through (3) of subsection (b) of this section, then the Secretary shall do all of the following:
    1. Prepare a written notice informing the LME/MCO of the provisions of the Contract with which the LME/MCO is deemed not to be in compliance and the reasons therefor.
    2. Cause the notice of the noncompliance to be delivered to the LME/MCO.
    3. Allow the noncompliant LME/MCO 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notice to respond to the notice of noncompliance and to demonstrate compliance to the satisfaction of the Secretary.
    4. Upon the expiration of the period allowed under subdivision (3) of this subsection, make a final determination on the issue of compliance and promptly notify the LME/MCO of the determination.
    5. Upon a final determination that an LME/MCO is noncompliant, allow no more than 30 days following the date of notification of the final determination of noncompliance for the noncompliant LME/MCO to complete negotiations for a merger or realignment with a compliant LME/MCO that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    6. If the noncompliant LME/MCO does not successfully complete negotiations with a compliant LME/MCO as described in subdivision (5) of this subsection, assign the Contract of the noncompliant LME/MCO to a compliant LME/MCO.
    7. Oversee the transfer of the operations and contracts from the noncompliant LME/MCO to the compliant LME/MCO in accordance with the provisions in subsection (e) of this section.
  5. If the Secretary assigns the Contract of a noncompliant local management entity/managed care organization to a compliant LME/MCO under subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section, or under subdivision (6) of subsection (d) of this section, the Secretary shall oversee the orderly transfer of all management responsibilities, operations, and contracts of the noncompliant LME/MCO to the compliant LME/MCO. The noncompliant LME/MCO shall cooperate with the Secretary in order to ensure the uninterrupted provision of services to Medicaid recipients. In making this transfer, the Secretary shall do all of the following:
    1. Arrange for the providers of services to be reimbursed from the remaining fund balance or risk reserve of the noncompliant LME/MCO, or from other funds of the Department if necessary, for proper, authorized, and valid claims for services rendered that were not previously paid by the noncompliant LME/MCO.
    2. Effectuate an orderly transfer of management responsibilities from the noncompliant LME/MCO to the compliant LME/MCO, including the responsibility of paying providers for covered services that are subsequently rendered.
    3. Oversee the dissolution of the noncompliant LME/MCO, including transferring to the compliant LME/MCO all assets of the noncompliant LME/MCO, including any balance remaining in its risk reserve after payments have been made under subdivision (1) of this subsection. Risk reserve funds of the noncompliant LME/MCO may be used only to pay authorized and approved provider claims. Any funds remaining in the risk reserve transferred under this subdivision shall become part of the compliant LME/MCO’s risk reserve and subject to the same restrictions on the use of the risk reserve applicable to the compliant LME/MCO. If the risk reserves transferred from the noncompliant LME/MCO are insufficient, the Secretary shall guarantee any needed risk reserves for the compliant LME/MCO arising from the additional risks being assumed by the compliant LME/MCO until the compliant LME/MCO has established fifteen percent (15%) risk reserves. All other assets shall be used to satisfy the liabilities of the noncompliant LME/MCO. In the event there are insufficient assets to satisfy the liabilities of the noncompliant LME/MCO, it shall be the responsibility of the Secretary to satisfy the liabilities of the noncompliant LME/MCO.
    4. Following completion of the actions specified in subdivisions (1) through (3) of this subsection, direct the dissolution of the noncompliant LME/MCO and deliver a notice of dissolution to the board of county commissioners of each of the counties in the dissolved LME/MCO. An LME/MCO that is dissolved by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this section may be dissolved at any time during the fiscal year.
  6. The Secretary shall provide a copy of each written, signed certification of compliance or noncompliance completed in accordance with this section to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division.
  7. As used in this section, the following terms mean:
    1. Compliant local management entity/managed care organization. — An LME/MCO that has undergone an independent external assessment and been determined by the Secretary to be operating successfully and to have the capability of expanding.
    2. Contract. — The contract between the Department of Health and Human Services and a local management entity for the operation of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver.

History. 2013-85, s. 2; 2018-5, s. 11F.10(d).

Editor’s Note.

The definitions in subsection (g), as enacted by Session Laws 2013-85, s. 2, were in reverse order, and were redesignated at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes to preserve alphabetical order.

Session Laws 2013-85 provides in its preamble: “Whereas, S.L. 2011-264, as amended by Section 13 of S.L. 2012-151, required the Department of Health and Human Services (Department) to restructure the statewide management of the delivery of services for individuals with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and substance abuse disorders through the statewide expansion of the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver; and

“Whereas, a local management entity anaged care organization (LME/MCO) that is awarded a contract to operate the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver was required to maintain fidelity to the Piedmont Behavioral Health (PBH) demonstration model; and

“Whereas, LME/MCOs are acting as Medicaid vendors and the Department must ensure that they are compliant with the provisions of S.L. 2011-264, as amended by Section 13 of S.L. 2012-151, as well as all applicable federal, State, and contractual requirements; Now, therefore, The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.10(a), provides: “The General Assembly finds that a viable State-funded behavioral health system is critical to accomplishing the State’s goals for behavioral health, meeting the needs of the covered populations, and achieving the desired outcomes detailed in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Strategic Plan for Improvement of Behavioral Health Services. Integral to assessing the State’s behavioral health system is the development of a method to determine the viability of local management entities anaged care organizations (LME/MCOs) and the establishment of short-term and intermediate term solvency standards that provide a uniform analysis of each LME/MCO’s financial position, provide a mechanism for ongoing assessment of each LME/MCO’s viability, inform the State’s funding decisions, and enhance short-term and intermediate term planning by the LME/MCOs.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2018.’ ”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2018-2019 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2018-2019 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.10(d), effective September 1, 2018, rewrote subdivision (b)(1); and substituted “subsection (b)” for “subsection (c)” in the middle of subdivision (c)(1).

§ 122C-125. Area Authority financial failure; State assumption of financial control.

At any time that the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services determines that an area authority is in imminent danger of failing financially and of failing to provide direct services to clients, the Secretary, after providing written notification of the Secretary’s intent to the area board and after providing the area authority an opportunity to be heard, may assume control of the financial affairs of the area authority and appoint an administrator to exercise the powers assumed. This assumption of control shall have the effect of divesting the area authority of its powers as to the adoption of budgets, expenditures of money, and all other financial powers conferred in the area authority by law. County funding of the area authority shall continue when the State has assumed control of the financial affairs of the area authority. At no time after the State has assumed this control shall a county withdraw funds previously obligated or appropriated to the area authority. The Secretary shall adopt rules to define imminent danger of failing financially and of failing to provide direct services to clients.

Upon assumption of financial control, the Department shall, in conjunction with the area authority, develop and implement a corrective plan of action and provide notification to the area authority’s board of directors of the plan. The Department shall also keep the county board of commissioners and the area authority’s board of directors informed of any ongoing concerns or problems with the area authority’s finances.

History. 1995, c. 507, s. 23.2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 749, s. 7; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a).

§ 122C-125.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.13(a), effective July 1, 2002.

§ 122C-125.2. LME/MCO solvency ranges; formula; corrective action plan.

  1. Beginning on September 1, 2018, the Department shall calculate on a quarterly basis a solvency range for each LME/MCO as a sum of the following figures to produce upper and lower range values:
    1. Incurred but not reported claims figure. — The incurred but not reported claims figure shall be calculated by multiplying an LME/MCO’s service spending for the preceding 12 months by six and eight-tenths percent (6.8%). If an LME/MCO experiences extenuating circumstances supported by actuarial documentation, then the Department may utilize a percentage other than six and eight-tenths (6.8%) for that LME/MCO.
    2. Net operating liabilities figure. — The net operating liabilities figure shall be calculated by subtracting noncash current accounts receivable from the nonclaims current liabilities, as reported on the LME/MCO’s most recent balance sheet. If the noncash accounts receivable are greater than the nonclaim liabilities, then the value for the net operating liabilities figure is zero.
    3. Catastrophic or extraordinary events range. — The catastrophic or extraordinary events range shall be calculated as the range between a lower figure and an upper figure. The lower figure shall be calculated by multiplying an LME/MCO’s service expenditures from the preceding 12 months by four and fifteen-hundredths percent (4.15%). The upper figure shall be calculated by multiplying an LME/MCO’s service expenditures from the preceding 12 months by eight and three-tenths percent (8.3%).
    4. Required intergovernmental transfers figure. — The required intergovernmental transfers figure is the amount of funds needed by an LME/MCO to make any intergovernmental transfers required by law over the subsequent 24 months.
    5. Projected operating loss figure. — The projected operating loss figure is the projected net loss for an LME/MCO over the subsequent 24 months. In projecting the net loss for an LME/MCO, the Department shall use the net loss of the LME/MCO in the preceding 12 months adjusted for any changes in single-stream funding, intergovernmental transfers, or other factors known to the Department that will impact the LME/MCO’s net loss over the subsequent 24 months. If a net profit is projected for an LME/MCO, then this figure is zero.
    6. Reinvestment plan figure. — The reinvestment plan figure is the amount required for all qualifying expenditures contained in an LME/MCO’s reinvestment plans over the subsequent 36 months. To qualify as an expenditure under this subdivision, the expenditure must be related to one of the following:
      1. An initiative that supports specific goals or health status outcomes of the State in relation to the State’s behavioral health needs.
      2. An initiative that meets a State behavioral health need, as defined in law or by the Department.
      3. Funding for infrastructure that supports the effective and efficient operation of the LME/MCO.
      4. Funding for a facility within the LME/MCO catchment area that is necessary to meet to the needs of the population served by the LME/MCO.
      5. New or expanded initiatives and programmatic improvements to the State behavioral health system.
      6. Working capital to be utilized to fund changes in rates, operations, or programs.
      7. Assistance to public school units within the LME/MCO catchment area for student behavioral health needs.
  2. Upon calculation of the solvency range for each LME/MCO required by subsection (a) of this section, the Department shall compare the cash balance of each LME/MCO to its solvency range. For purposes of this subsection, the cash balance shall consist of the total of the LME/MCO’s cash and investment balances, including its Medicaid Risk Reserve, as reported on the LME/MCO’s most recent balance sheet.Upon comparison of an LME/MCO’s cash balance to its solvency range, the Department shall take one of the following actions:
    1. If an LME/MCO’s cash balance is five percent (5%) or more below the lower solvency range figure or five percent (5%) or more above the upper solvency range figure, then the Department shall notify the LME/MCO and the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly of the comparison results. Within 30 days from providing notice to the LME/MCO, the Department shall develop, in collaboration with the LME/MCO, a corrective action plan for the LME/MCO. The corrective action plan must include specific actions, which may include changes to the LME/MCO’s reinvestment plan, utilization management, and capitation or provider rates, to bring the LME/MCO’s cash balance within the solvency range, as well as a time line for implementation of these actions.
    2. If an LME/MCO’s cash balance is neither five percent (5%) or more below the lower solvency range figure nor five percent (5%) or more above the upper solvency range figure, then the Department shall notify the LME/MCO and the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly of the LME/MCO’s solvency range for the quarter and the Department’s comparison of the LME/MCO’s cash balance to this solvency range. No further action shall be required.
  3. Beginning on October 15, 2018, the Department shall submit a quarterly report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and NC Health Choice, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, and the Fiscal Research Division detailing the solvency ranges and comparisons required under subsection (b) of this section for each LME/MCO. The Department shall include in its report a copy of any new corrective action plans developed as a result of those comparisons, as well as any status updates on previously reported corrective action plans.
  4. For any calculation required by this section that is based upon the preceding 12 months, the Department is authorized to make adjustments to that calculation that take into account any changes in an LME/MCO’s catchment area that occurred during that 12-month period.

History. 2018-5, s. 11F.10(b); 2020-49, s. 5.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.10(f), made this section effective June 12, 2018.

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.10(a), provides: “(a) The General Assembly finds that a viable State-funded behavioral health system is critical to accomplishing the State’s goals for behavioral health, meeting the needs of the covered populations, and achieving the desired outcomes detailed in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Strategic Plan for Improvement of Behavioral Health Services. Integral to assessing the State’s behavioral health system is the development of a method to determine the viability of local management entities/managed care organizations (LME/MCOs) and the establishment of short-term and intermediate term solvency standards that provide a uniform analysis of each LME/MCO’s financial position, provide a mechanism for ongoing assessment of each LME/MCO’s viability, inform the State’s funding decisions, and enhance short-term and intermediate term planning by the LME/MCOs.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 11F.10(c), provides: “(c) At the next renewal or amendment of a contract with a local management entity an- aged care organization (LME/MCO), the De- partment of Health and Human Services shall explicitly require, as part of that contract, the LME/MCO to comply with G.S. 122C-125.2 , as enacted by subsection (b) of this section.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2018.’ ”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.4, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2018-2019 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2018-2019 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2018-5, s. 39.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2020-49, s. 5, effective June 29, 2020, added sub-subdivision (a)(6)g.

§§ 122C-125.3 through 122C-125.5.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

§ 122C-125.6. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.13(a), effective July 1, 2002.

§ 122C-126.1. Confidentiality of competitive health care information.

  1. For the purposes of this section, competitive health care information means information relating to competitive health care activities by or on behalf of the area authority. Competitive health care information shall be confidential and not a public record under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes; provided that any contract entered into by or on behalf of an area authority shall be a public record, unless otherwise exempted by law, or the contract contains competitive health care information, the determination of which shall be as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
  2. If an area authority is requested to disclose any contract that the area authority believes in good faith contains or constitutes competitive health care information, the area authority may either redact the portions of the contract believed to constitute competitive health care information prior to disclosure or, if the entire contract constitutes competitive health care information, refuse disclosure of the contract. The person requesting disclosure of the contract may institute an action pursuant to G.S. 132-9 to compel disclosure of the contract or any redacted portion thereof. In any action brought under this subsection, the issue for decision by the court shall be whether the contract, or portions of the contract withheld, constitutes competitive health care information, and in making its determination, the court shall be guided by the procedures and standards applicable to protective orders requested under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Before rendering a decision, the court shall review the contract in camera and hear arguments from the parties. If the court finds that the contract constitutes or contains competitive health care information, the court may either deny disclosure or may make such other appropriate orders as are permitted under Rule 26(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
  3. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prevent the Attorney General, the State Auditor, or an elected public body, in closed session, which has responsibility for the area authority, from having access to this confidential information. The disclosure to any public entity does not affect the confidentiality of the information. Members of the public entity shall have a duty not to further disclose the confidential information.

History. 2012-151, s. 10.

Part 2A. Consolidated Human Services.

§ 122C-127. Consolidated human services board; human services director.

  1. Except as otherwise provided by this section and subject to any limitations that may be imposed by the board of county commissioners under G.S. 153A-77 , a consolidated human services agency shall have the responsibility and authority set forth in G.S. 122C-117(a) to carry out the programs established in this Chapter in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Department and under the supervision of the Secretary in the same manner as an area authority. In addition to the powers conferred by G.S. 153A-77(d) , a consolidated human services board shall have all the powers and duties of the governing unit of an area authority as provided by G.S. 122C-117(b), except that the consolidated human services board may not:
    1. Appoint the human services director.
    2. Transmit or present the budget for social services programs.
    3. Enter into contracts, including contracts to provide services to governmental or private entities, unless specifically authorized to do so by the board of county commissioners in accordance with county contracting policies and procedures.
  2. In addition to the powers conferred by G.S. 153A-77(e) , a human services director shall have all the powers and duties of an area director as provided by G.S. 122C-121 , except that the human services director may:
    1. Serve as the executive officer of the consolidated human services board only to the extent and in the manner authorized by the county manager.
    2. Appoint staff of the consolidated human services agency only upon the approval of the county manager.The human services director is not an employee of the area board, but serves as an employee of the county under the direct supervision of the county manager.

History. 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 690, s. 12.

§§ 122C-128 through 122C-130.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 3. Service Delivery System.

§ 122C-131. Composition of system.

Mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services of the public system in this State shall be delivered through area authorities and State facilities.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 15.

§§ 122C-132, 122C-132.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.14, effective July 1, 2002.

§§ 122C-133 through 122C-140.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 4. Area Facilities.

§ 122C-141. Provision of services.

  1. The area authority or county program shall contract with other qualified public or private providers, agencies, institutions, or resources for the provision of services, and, subject to the approval of the Secretary, is authorized to provide services directly. The area authority or county program shall indicate in its local business plan how services will be provided and how the provision of services will address issues of access, availability of qualified public or private providers, consumer choice, and fair competition. The Secretary shall take into account these issues when reviewing the local business plan and considering approval of the direct provision of services. Unless an area authority or county program requests a shorter time, any approval granted by the Secretary shall be for not less than one year. The Secretary shall develop criteria for the approval of direct service provision by area authorities and county programs in accordance with this section and as evidenced by compliance with the local business plan. For the purposes of this section, a qualified public or private provider is a provider that meets the provider qualifications as defined by rules adopted by the Secretary.
  2. All area authority or county program services provided directly or under contract shall meet the requirements of applicable State statutes and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary. The Secretary may delay payments and, with written notification of cause, may reduce or deny payment of funds if an area authority or county program fails to meet these requirements.
  3. The area authority or board of county commissioners of a county program may contract with a health maintenance organization, certified and operating in accordance with the provisions of Article 67 of Chapter 58 of the General Statutes for the area authority or county program, to provide mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse services to enrollees in a health care plan provided by the health maintenance organization. The terms of the contract must meet the requirements of all applicable State statutes and rules of the Commission and Secretary governing both the provision of services by an area authority or county program and the general and fiscal operation of an area authority or county program and the reimbursement rate for services rendered shall be based on the usual and customary charges paid by the health maintenance organization to similar providers. Any provision in conflict with a State statute or rule of the Commission or the Secretary shall be void; however, the presence of any void provision in that contract does not render void any other provision in that contract which is not in conflict with a State statute or rule of the Commission or the Secretary. Subject to approval by the Secretary and pending the timely reimbursement of the contractual charges, the area authority or county program may expend funds for costs which may be incurred by the area authority or county program as a result of providing the additional services under a contractual agreement with a health maintenance organization.
  4. If two or more counties enter into an interlocal agreement under Article 20 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes to be a public provider of mental health, developmental disabilities, or substance abuse services (“public provider”), before an LME may enter into a contract with the public provider, all of the following must apply:
    1. The public provider must meet all the provider qualifications as defined by rules adopted by the Commission. A county that satisfies its duties under G.S. 122C-115(a) through a consolidated human services agency may not be considered a qualified provider for purposes of this subdivision.
    2. The LME must adopt a conflict of interest policy that applies to all provider contracts.
    3. The interlocal agreement must provide that any liabilities of the public provider shall be paid from its unobligated surplus funds and that if those funds are not sufficient to satisfy the indebtedness, the remaining indebtedness shall be apportioned to the participating counties.
  5. When enforcing rules adopted by the Commission,  the Secretary shall ensure that there is fair competition among providers.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, ss. 7, 18; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; c. 539, ss. 3, 4; c. 614, s. 7; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 839; 1989, c. 625, s. 16; 2001-437, s. 1.15; 2006-142, s. 4(l); 2007-504, s. 2.4(a).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 2.4(b), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall study the effect of G.S. 122C-141(d) and shall report its findings and recommendations to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services by December 1, 2009.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 4( l ), effective July 19, 2006, added subsections (d) and (e).

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 2.4, effective August 30, 2007, added the fourth sentence in subsection (a); substituted “Commission” for “Secretary” in subdivision (d)(1); rewrote subsection (e).

§ 122C-142. Contract for services.

  1. When the area authority contracts with persons for the provision of services, it shall use the standard contract adopted by the Secretary and shall assure that these contracted services meet the requirements of applicable State statutes and the rules of the Commission and the Secretary. However, an area authority may amend the contract to comply with any court-imposed duty or responsibility. An area authority that is operating under a Medicaid waiver may amend the contract subject to the approval of the Secretary.  Terms of the standard contract shall require the area authority to monitor the contract to assure that rules and State statutes are met. It shall also place an obligation upon the entity providing services to provide to the area authority timely data regarding the clients being served, the services provided, and the client outcomes. The Secretary may also monitor contracted services to assure that rules and State statutes are met.
  2. When the area authority contracts for services, it may provide funds to purchase liability insurance, to provide legal representation, and to pay any claim with respect to liability for acts, omissions, or decisions by members of the boards or employees of the persons with whom the area authority contracts. These acts, omissions, and decisions shall be ones that arise out of the performance of the contract and may not result from actual fraud, corruption, or actual malice on the part of the board members or employees.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 18; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; c. 539, ss. 3, 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2006-142, s. 1; 2006-259, s. 23; 2013-85, s. 9.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-142, s. 1, effective July 19, 2006, in subsection (a) in the first sentence, deleted “the area authority” following “the provision of services,” and inserted “it shall use the standard contract adopted by the Secretary and,” inserted the second sentence, in the fourth sentence, inserted “standard” preceding “contract,” and inserted the fifth sentence.

Session Laws 2006-259, s. 23, effective August 23, 2006, inserted the third sentence in subsection (a).

§ 122C-142.1. Substance abuse services for those convicted of driving while impaired or driving while less than 21 years old after consuming alcohol or drugs.

  1. Services. —  An area authority shall provide, directly or by contract, the substance abuse services needed by a person to obtain a certificate of completion required under G.S. 20-17.6 as a condition for the restoration of a drivers license. A person may obtain the required services from an area facility, from a private facility authorized by the Department to provide this service, or, with the approval of the Department, from an agency that is located in another state. (a1) Authorization of a Private Facility Provider. — The Department shall authorize a private facility located in this State to provide substance abuse services needed by a person to obtain a certificate of completion if the private facility complies with all of the requirements of this subsection:
    1. Notifies both the designated area facility for the catchment area in which it is located and the Department of its intent to provide the services.
    2. Agrees to comply with the laws and rules concerning these services that apply to area facilities.
    3. Pays the Department the applicable fee for authorizing and monitoring the services of the facility. The initial fee is payable at the time the facility notifies the Department of its intent to provide the services and by July 1 of each year thereafter. Collected fees shall be used by the Division for program monitoring and quality assurance. The applicable fee is based upon the number of assessments completed during the prior fiscal year as set forth below:

      Number of Assessments Fee Amount

      0-24 $250.00

      25-99 $500.00

      100 or more $750.00.

  2. Assessments.—  To conduct a substance abuse assessment, a facility shall give a client a standardized test approved by the Department to determine chemical dependency and shall conduct a clinical interview with the client. Based on the assessment, the facility shall recommend that the client either attend an alcohol and drug education traffic (ADET) school or obtain treatment. A recommendation shall be reviewed and signed by a certified alcoholism, drug abuse, or substance abuse counselor, as defined by the Commission, a Certified Substance Abuse Counselor, or by a physician certified by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). The signature on the recommendation shall be the personal signature of the individual authorized to review the recommendation and not the signature of his or her agent. The signature shall reflect that the authorized individual has personally reviewed the recommendation and, with full knowledge of the contents of the recommendation, approved of the recommended treatment.

    (b1) Persons Authorized to Conduct Assessments. — The following individuals are authorized to conduct a substance abuse assessment under subsection (b) of this section:

    1. A Certified Substance Abuse Counselor (CSAC), as defined by the Commission.
    2. A Licensed Clinical Addiction Specialist (LCAS), as defined by the Commission.
    3. Repealed by Session Laws 2004-197, s. 2, effective October 1, 2008, and applicable to substance abuse assessments conducted on or after that date.
    4. A person licensed by the North Carolina Medical Board or the North Carolina Psychology Board.
    5. A physician certified by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).
  3. School or Treatment. —  Attendance at an ADET school is required if none of the following applies and completion of a treatment program is required if any of the following applies:
    1. The person took a chemical test at the time of the offense that caused the person’s license to be revoked and the test revealed that the person had an alcohol concentration at any relevant time after driving of at least 0.15.
    2. The person has a prior conviction of an offense involving impaired driving.
    3. The substance abuse assessment identifies a substance abuse disability.
  4. Standards. —  An ADET school shall offer the curriculum established by the Commission and shall comply with the rules adopted by the Commission. A substance abuse treatment program offered to a person who needs the program to obtain a certificate of completion shall comply with the rules adopted by the Commission.

    (d1) Persons Authorized to Provide Instruction. — Beginning January 1, 2009, individuals who provide ADET school instruction as a Department-authorized ADETS instructor must have at least one of the following qualifications:

    1. A Certified Substance Abuse Counselor (CSAC), as defined by the Commission.
    2. A Licensed Clinical Addictions Specialist (LCAS), as defined by the Commission.
    3. A Certified Substance Abuse Prevention Consultant (CSAPC), as defined by the Commission.
  5. Certificate of Completion. —  Any facility that issues a certificate of completion shall forward the original certificate of completion to the Department. The Department shall review the certificate of completion for accuracy and completeness. If the Department finds the certificate of completion to be accurate and complete, the Department shall forward it to the Division of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Transportation. If the Department finds the certificate of completion is not accurate or complete, the Department shall return the certificate of completion to the area facility for appropriate action.
  6. Fees. —  A person who has a substance abuse assessment conducted for the purpose of obtaining a certificate of completion shall pay to the assessing agency a fee of one hundred dollars ($100). A person shall pay to a school a fee of one hundred sixty dollars ($160.00). A person shall pay to a treatment facility a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75.00). If the defendant is treated by an area mental health facility, G.S. 122C-146 applies after receipt of the seventy-five dollar ($75.00) fee.A facility that provides to a person who is required to obtain a certificate of completion a substance abuse assessment, an ADET school, or a substance abuse treatment program may require the person to pay a fee required by this subsection before it issues a certificate of completion. As stated in G.S. 122C-146 , however, an area facility may not deny a service to a person because the person is unable to pay.A facility shall remit to the Department ten percent (10%) of each fee paid to the facility under this subsection by a person who attends an ADET school conducted by the facility. The Department may use amounts remitted to it under this subsection only to support, evaluate, and administer ADET schools. (f1) Multiple Assessments. — If a person has more than one offense for which a certificate of completion is required under G.S. 20-17.6 , the person shall pay the assessment fee required under subsection (f) of this section for each certificate of completion required. However, the facility shall conduct only one substance abuse assessment and recommend only one ADET school or treatment program for all certificates of completion required at that time, and the person shall pay the fee required under subsection (f) of this section for only one school or treatment program.If any of the criteria in subdivisions (c)(1), (c)(2), or (c)(3) of this section are present in any of the offenses for which the person needs a certificate of completion, completion of a treatment program shall be required pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.The provisions of this subsection do not apply to subsequent assessments performed after a certificate of completion has already been issued for a previous assessment.
  7. Out-of-State Services. —  A person may obtain a substance abuse service needed to obtain a certificate of completion from a provider located in another state if the service offered by that provider is substantially similar to the service offered by a provider located in this State. A person who obtains a service from a provider located in another state is responsible for paying any fees imposed by the provider.
  8. Rules. —  The Commission may adopt rules to implement this section. In developing rules for determining when a person needs to be placed in a substance abuse treatment program, the Commission shall consider diagnostic criteria such as those contained in the most recent revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual or used by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).
  9. Report. —  The Department shall submit an annual report on substance abuse assessments to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations. The report is due by February 1. Each facility that provides services needed by a person to obtain a certificate of completion shall file an annual report with the Department by October 1 that contains the information the Department needs to compile the report the Department is required to submit under this section.The report submitted to the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations shall include all of the following information and any other information requested by that Commission:
    1. The number of persons required to obtain a certificate of completion during the previous fiscal year as a condition of restoring the person’s drivers license under G.S. 20-17.6 .
    2. The number of substance abuse assessments conducted during the previous fiscal year for the purpose of obtaining a certificate of completion.
    3. Of the number of assessments reported under subdivision (2) of this subsection, the number recommending attendance at an ADET school, the number recommending treatment, and, for those recommending treatment, the level of treatment recommended.
    4. Of the number of persons recommended for an ADET school or treatment under subdivision (3) of this subsection, the number who completed the school or treatment.
    5. The number of substance abuse assessments conducted by each facility and, of these assessments, the number that recommended attendance at an ADET school and the number that recommended treatment.
    6. The fees paid to a facility for providing services for persons to obtain a certificate of completion and the facility’s costs in providing those services.
  10. Repealed by Session Laws 2013-360, s. 12A.8(a), effective July 1, 2013.

History. 1995, c. 496, ss. 10, 13; 2001-370, s. 9; 2003-396, ss. 1, 3, 4; 2004-197, ss. 1, 2, 3; 2005-312, ss. 1, 2, 4; 2008-130, ss. 7, 8; 2013-360, s. 12A.8(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995, c. 496, s. 14, provided that this section became effective January 1, 1996, and was applicable to offenses occurring on or after that date, and that s. 13, which substituted “less than 21 years old” for “a provisional licensee” in the catchline, became effective only if House Bill 353 of the 1995 General Assembly was enacted. House Bill 353 was ratified as Session Laws 1995, c. 506, on July 28, 1995.

Pursuant to Session Laws 2005-312, s. 5, amendments to subsection (f) of this section are effective when the rules adopted under section 3 of the act become effective and shall apply to fees charged for ADET School Instruction that commences on or after that date. The rule changes were adopted and took effect October 1, 2006.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-197, s. 2, effective October 1, 2008, and applicable to substance abuse assessments conducted on or after that date, repealed subdivision (b1)(3) which read: “(3) A Substance Abuse Counselor Intern who is supervised by a Certified Clinical Supervisor (CCS), as defined by the Commission, and who meets the minimum qualifications established by the Commission for individuals performing substance abuse assessments.”

Session Laws 2004-197, s. 3, effective October 1, 2004, substituted “one hundred dollars ($100)” for “fifty dollars ($50)” in subsection (f).

Session Laws 2005-312, s. 1, effective when the rules adopted under Section 3 of the act become effective, and applicable to fees charged for ADET school instruction that commences on or after that date, in subsection (f), in the first paragraph, added the second sentence and deleted “treatment facility or” preceding “school” and substituted “one hundred sixty dollars ($160.00)” for “seventy-five dollars ($75.00)” in the third sentence, and in the first sentence of the third paragraph, substituted “A facility” for “An area facility” and “ten percent (10%)” for “five percent (5%),” and deleted “area” preceding “facility” twice. See Editor’s note.

Session Laws 2005-312, ss. 2 and 4, effective August 25, 2005, added subsections (d1) and (j).

Session Laws 2008-130, ss. 7 and 8, effective July 28, 2008, in subdivision (b1)(2), substituted “Licensed” for “Certified” and substituted “(LCAS)” for “(CCAS)”; made minor grammatical changes throughout subsection (d1); and in subdivision (d1)(2), substituted “Licensed” for “Certified,” substituted “Addictions” for “Addiction,” and substituted “(LCAS)” for “(CCAS).”

§ 122C-142.2. Presentation at a hospital for mental health treatment.

  1. Definitions. —  The following definitions apply in this section:
    1. Assessment. — A comprehensive clinical assessment, psychiatric evaluation, or a substantially equivalent assessment.
    2. Director. — The director of the department of social services in the county in which the juvenile resides or is found, or the director’s representative as authorized in G.S. 108A-14 .
  2. If a juvenile in the custody of a department of social services presents to a hospital emergency department for mental health treatment, the director shall contact the appropriate LME/MCO or prepaid health plan within 24 hours of the determination that the juvenile should not remain at the hospital and no appropriate placement is immediately available, to request an assessment.
  3. Consistent with the care coordination responsibilities under G.S. 122C-115.4(b)(5), the LME/MCO or prepaid health plan must, when applicable or required by their contract with the Department, arrange for an assessment performed by either the juvenile’s clinical home provider; the hospital, if able and willing; or other qualified licensed clinician within five business days following notification from the director.
  4. Based on the findings and recommendations of the assessment, all of the following must occur:
    1. If the comprehensive clinical assessment recommends a traditional foster home or a Level I group home, the director shall identify and provide the placement within five business days. The county department of social services shall be responsible for transporting the juvenile to the identified placement within five business days.
    2. If the assessment recommends a level of care requiring prior authorization by the LME/MCO or prepaid health plan, the LME/MCO or prepaid health plan shall authorize an appropriate level of care and identify appropriate providers within five business days and assign a care coordinator for the duration that the LME/MCO or prepaid health plan provides services to the juvenile. Once an appropriate level of care has been authorized and providers identified, the director shall place the juvenile in the appropriate placement within five business days. The county department of social services shall be responsible for transporting the juvenile to the identified placement.
  5. The county department of social services shall provide ongoing case management, virtually or in person, to address the juvenile’s educational and social needs during the juvenile’s stay in the hospital. The hospital shall cooperate with the county department of social services to provide access to the juvenile during the juvenile’s stay in the hospital.
  6. If, on completion of the assessment, the director under subdivision (d)(1) of this section or LME/MCO or prepaid health plan under subdivision (d)(2) of this section is unable to identify an appropriate available placement or provider for the juvenile, or if the assessment recommendations differ, the director shall immediately notify the Department of Health and Human Services’ Rapid Response Team. The director, pursuant to G.S. 7B-302(a1)(1), is authorized to disclose confidential information to the Rapid Response Team to ensure the juvenile is protected from abuse or neglect and for the provision of protective services to the juvenile. All confidential information disclosed to the Rapid Response Team shall remain confidential, shall not be further redisclosed unless authorized by State or federal law or regulations, and shall not be considered a public record. Notification to the Rapid Response Team does not relieve the director, LME/MCO, prepaid health plan, or any other entity from carrying out their responsibilities to the juvenile.
  7. The Rapid Response Team shall be comprised of representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services from the Division of Social Services; the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services; and the Division of Health Benefits. Upon receipt of a notification from a director, the Rapid Response Team shall evaluate the information provided and coordinate a response to address the immediate needs of the juvenile, which may include any of the following:
    1. Identifying an appropriate level of care for the juvenile.
    2. Identifying appropriate providers or other placement for the juvenile.
    3. Making a referral to qualified services providers.
    4. Developing an action plan to ensure the needs of the juvenile are met.
    5. Developing a plan to ensure that relevant parties carry out any responsibilities to the juvenile.

History. 2021-132, s. 5(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2021-132, s. 5(c), made this section, as added by Session Laws 2021-132, s. 5(a), effective October 1, 2021.

§ 122C-143. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220.

§ 122C-143.1. Policy guidance.

  1. The General Assembly shall, as it considers necessary, endorse as policy guidance long-range plans for the broad age/disability categories of persons to be served and the services to be provided by area authorities.
  2. The Secretary shall develop a payment policy that designates, within broad age/disability categories, the priority populations, based on their disability level and the types of service to be supported by State resources. The Secretary shall review the Department’s payment policy annually to assure that payments are made consistent with the State’s long-range plans.
  3. The Secretary shall ensure that the payment policy provides incentives designated to target resources consistent with legislative policy and with the State’s long-range plans and to promote equal accessibility to services for individuals regardless of their catchment area.
  4. Upon request of the Secretary, each area authority shall develop, revise, or amend its local long-range plans to be consistent with the policy guidance set forth in the State’s long-range plans. Local service implementation plans shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary.
  5. The Secretary shall ensure that the Department’s requests for expansion funds for area authorities are consistent with the State’s long-range plans and include consideration of needs identified by the area authorities and their local plans.

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(e).

§ 122C-143.2. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2001-437, s. 1.16, effective July 1, 2002.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2002-159, s. 40(b), effective October 11, 2002, had substituted “G.S. 122C-147.1(d)(2)” for “G.S. 147.1(c)92)” in subsection (c).

§ 122C-144. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220(d), effective July 1, 1993.

§ 122C-144.1. Budget format and reports.

  1. The area authority shall maintain its budget in accordance with the requirements of Article 3 of Subchapter III of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes, the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act.
  2. The Secretary may require periodic reports of receipts and expenditures for all area authority services provided directly or under contract according to a format prescribed by the Secretary.
  3. In accordance with G.S. 159-34 , the area authority shall have an audit completed and submit it to the Local Government Commission.
  4. The Secretary may require reports of client characteristics, staffing patterns, agency policies or activities, services, or specific financial data of the area authority, but the reports shall not identify individual clients of the area authority unless specifically required by State statute or federal statute or regulation, or unless valid consent for the release has been given by the client or legally responsible person.

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(g).

§ 122C-145. [Repealed]

Renumbered as G.S. 122C-151.2 by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220.

§ 122C-146. Uniform co-payment schedule.

  1. The LME and its contractual provider agencies shall implement the co-payment schedule based on family income adopted by the Secretary under G.S. 122C-112.1(a)(34). The LME is responsible for determining the applicability of the co-payment to individuals authorized by the LME to receive services. An LME that provides services and its contractual provider agencies shall also make every reasonable effort to collect appropriate reimbursement for costs in providing these services from individuals or entities able to pay, including insurance and third-party payments. However, no individual may be refused services because of an inability to pay.
  2. Individuals may not be charged for free services, as required in “The Amendments to the Education of the Handicapped Act”, P.L. 99-457, provided to eligible infants and toddlers and their families. This exemption from charges does not exempt insurers or other third-party payors from being charged for payment for these services, if the person who is legally responsible for any eligible infant or toddler is first advised that the person may or may not grant permission for the insurer or other payor to be billed for the free services.
  3. All funds collected from co-payments for LME operated services shall be used to provide services to individuals in targeted populations.The collection of co-payments by an LME that provides services may not be used as justification for reduction or replacement of the budgeted commitment of local tax revenue. All funds collected from co-payments by contractual provider agencies shall be used to provide services to individuals in targeted populations.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 16; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1003, s. 4; 1991, c. 215, s. 2; 1993, c. 487, s. 3; c. 553, s. 36; 2007-410, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1003, s. 6 provided: “Sections 1 through 4 of this act [which amended this section] shall become effective July 1, 1990, and Section 5 of this act shall become effective July 1, 1991, if and only if specific funds are appropriated for the specific programs established by this act. Funds appropriated for the 1990-91 fiscal year or for any year in the future do not constitute any entitlement to services beyond those provided for that fiscal year. Nothing in this act creates any rights except to the extent that funds are appropriated by the State to implement its provisions from year to year and nothing in this act obligates the General Assembly to appropriate any funds to implement its provisions.” An appropriation was made to implement the provisions of this act in the 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990) Session.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-410, s. 1, effective July 1, 2008, and applicable to services provided on or after that date, rewrote the section.

§ 122C-147. Financing and title of area authority property.

  1. Repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220(i).
  2. Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary, State appropriations to area authorities shall be used exclusively for the operating costs of the area authority; provided however:
    1. The Secretary may specify that designated State funds may be used by area authorities (i) for the purchase, alteration, improvement, or rehabilitation of real estate to be used as a facility or (ii) in contracting with a private, nonprofit corporation or with another governmental entity that operates facilities for the mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or substance abusers and according to the terms of the contract between the area authority and the private, nonprofit corporation or with the governmental entity, for the purchase, alteration, improvement, rehabilitation of real estate or, to make a lump sum down payment or periodic payments on a real property mortgage in the name of the private, nonprofit corporation or governmental entity.
    2. Upon cessation of the use of the facility by the area authority, if operated by the area authority, or upon termination, default, or nonrenewal of the contract if operated by a contractual agency, the Department shall be reimbursed in accordance with rules adopted by the Secretary for the Department’s participation in the purchase of the facility.
  3. All real property purchased for use by the area authority shall be provided by local or federal funds unless otherwise allowed under subsection (b) of this section or by specific capital funds appropriated by the General Assembly. The title to this real property and the authority to acquire it is held by the area authority. Real property may not be acquired by means of an installment contract under G.S. 160A-20 unless the Local Government Commission has approved the acquisition. No deficiency judgment may be rendered against any unit of local government in any action for breach of a contractual obligation authorized by this subsection, and the taxing power of a unit of local government is not and may not be pledged directly or indirectly to secure any moneys due under a contract authorized by this subsection.
  4. The area authority may lease real property.
  5. Equipment necessary for the operation of the area authority may be obtained with local, State, federal, or donated funds, or a combination of these.
  6. The area authority may acquire or lease personal property. An acquisition may be accomplished by an installment contract under G.S. 160A-20 or by a lease-purchase agreement. An area authority may not acquire personal property by means of an installment contract under G.S. 160A-20 without the approval of the board or boards of commissioners of all the counties that comprise the area authority. The approval of a board of county commissioners shall be by resolution of the board and may have any necessary or proper conditions, including provisions for distribution of the proceeds in the event of disposition of the property by the area authority. The area authority may not acquire personal property by means of an installment contract under G.S. 160A-20 without the approval of the Local Government Commission, when required by that statute. No deficiency judgment may be rendered against any unit of local government in any action for breach of a contractual obligation authorized by this subsection, and the taxing power of a unit of local government is not and shall not be pledged directly or indirectly to secure any moneys due under a contract authorized by this subsection. Title to personal property may be held by the area authority.
  7. All area authority funds shall be spent in accordance with the rules of the Secretary. Failure to comply with the rules is grounds for the Secretary to stop participation in the funding of the particular program. The Secretary may withdraw funds from a specific program of services not being administered in accordance with an approved plan and budget after written notice and subject to an appeal as provided by G.S. 122C-145 and Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
  8. Notwithstanding subsection (b) of this section and in addition to the purposes listed in that subsection, the funds allocated by the Secretary for services for members of the class identified in Willie M., et al. vs. Hunt, et al. (C-C-79-294, Western District) may be used for the purchase, alteration, improvement, or rehabilitation of real property owned or to be owned by a nonprofit corporation or by another governmental entity and used or to be used as a facility.
  9. Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section and in addition to the purposes listed in that subsection, funds allocated by the Secretary for services for members of the class identified in Willie M., et al. vs. Hunt, et al. (C-C-79-294, Western District) may be used for the purchase, alteration, improvement, or rehabilitation of real property used by an area authority as long as the title to the real property is vested in the county where the property is located or is vested in another governmental entity. If the property ceases to be used in accordance with the annual plan, the unamortized part of funds spent under this subsection for the purchase, alteration, improvement, or rehabilitation of real property shall be returned to the Department, in accordance with the rules of the Secretary.
  10. Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section the area authority, with the approval of the Secretary, may use local funds for the alteration, improvement, and rehabilitation of real property owned by a nonprofit corporation or by another governmental entity under contract with the area authority and used or to be used as a facility. Prior to the use of county appropriated funds for this purpose, the area authority shall obtain consent of the board or boards of commissioners of all the counties that comprise the area authority. The consent shall be by resolution of the affected board or boards of county commissioners and may have any necessary or proper conditions, including provisions for distribution of the proceeds in the event of disposition of the property.

History. 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 613; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 29; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1983, c. 5; c. 25; c. 402; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 720, s. 3; c. 784; 1989, c. 625, s. 17; 1993, c. 321, s. 220(h), (i); 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 592, s. 1; 1995, c. 305, s. 1; 2012-151, s. 8.

Editor’s Note.

Subsection (a) of this section, concerning allocation of funds for area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services, was repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220. For present similar provisions, see G.S. 122C-147.1 .

Section 122C-145, referred to in subsection (g), was renumbered as G.S. 122C-151.2 by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220(m), effective January 1, 1993.

For elimination of administration, infrastructure, funding designation, and eligibility determination process for former Willie M program, see note at G.S. 143B-137.1 under “Services to Children at Risk for Institutionalization or Other Out-of-Home Placement.”

§ 122C-147.1. Appropriations and allocations.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, funds shall be appropriated by the General Assembly in broad age/disability categories. The Secretary shall allocate and account for funds in broad age/disability categories so that the area authority may, with flexibility, earn funds in response to local needs that are identified within the payment policy developed in accordance with G.S. 122C-143.1(b).
  2. When the General Assembly determines that it is necessary to appropriate funds for a more specific purpose than the broad age/disability category, the Secretary shall determine whether expenditure accounting, special reporting within earning from a broad fund, the Memorandum of Agreement, or some other mechanism allows the best accounting for the funds.

    (b1) Notwithstanding subsection (b) of this section, funds appropriated by the General Assembly for crisis services shall not be allocated in broad disability or age/disability categories. Subsection (c) of this section shall not apply to funds appropriated by the General Assembly for crisis services.

  3. Funds that have been appropriated by the General Assembly for a more specific purpose than specified in subsection (a) of this section shall be converted to a broad age/disability category at the beginning of the second biennium following the appropriation, unless otherwise acted upon by the General Assembly.
  4. The Secretary shall allocate funds to area programs:
    1. To be earned in a purchase of service basis, at negotiated reimbursement rates, for services that are included in the payment policy and delivered to mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and substance abuse clients and for services that are included in the payment policy to other recipients; or
    2. To be paid under a grant on the basis of agreed-upon expenditures, when the Secretary determines that it would be impractical to pay on a purchase of service basis.

      (d1) Notwithstanding subsections (b) and (d) of this section, each area program shall determine whether to earn the funds for crisis services and funds for services to substance abuse clients in a purchase-for-service basis, under a grant, or some combination of the two. Area programs shall account for funds expended on a grant basis according to procedures required by the Secretary and in a manner that is similar to funds expended in a purchase-for-service basis.

  5. After the close of a fiscal year, final payments of funds shall be made:
    1. Under the purchase of service basis, on the earnings of the area authority for the delivery to individuals within each age/disability group, of any services that are consistent with the payment policy established in G.S. 122C-143.1(b), up to the final allocation amount; or
    2. When awarded on an expenditure basis, on allowable actual expenditures, up to the final allocation amount.Under rules adopted by the Secretary, final payments shall be adjusted on the basis of the audit required in G.S. 122C-144.1(d).

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(j); 2007-323, ss. 10.49(b), (q).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-323, ss. 10.49(b) and 10.49(q), effective July 1, 2007, added subsections (b1) and (d1).

§ 122C-147.2. Purchase of services and reimbursement rates.

  1. When funds are used to purchase services, the following provisions apply:
    1. Reimbursement rates for specific types of service shall be negotiated between the Secretary and the area authority. The negotiation shall begin with the rate determined by a standardized cost-finding and rate-setting procedure approved by the Secretary.
    2. The reimbursement rate used for the payment of services shall incorporate operating and administrative costs, including costs for property in accordance with G.S. 122C-147 .
  2. To ensure uniformity in rates charged to area programs and funded with State-allocated resources, the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services of the Department of Health and Human Services may require a private agency that provides services under contract with an area program or county program, except for hospital services that have an established Medicaid rate, to complete an agency-wide uniform cost finding in accordance with subsection (a) of this section. The resulting cost shall be the maximum included for the private agency in the contracting area program’s unit cost finding. If a private agency fails to timely and accurately complete the required agency-wide uniform cost finding in a manner acceptable to the Department’s controller’s office, the Department may suspend all Department funding and payment to the private agency until such time as an acceptable cost finding has been completed by the private agency and approved by the Department’s controller’s office.

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(j); 2005-276, s. 10.30.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2005-276, s. 10.30, effective July 1, 2005, designated the previously undesignated introductory paragraph as subsection (a); in subdivision (a)(1), deleted “that is required by G.S. 122C-143.2(a) or by another method” following “procedure”; added subsection (b), and made a minor stylistic change.

§§ 122C-148 through 122C-150. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220.

Editor’s Note.

For present provisions relating to appropriations and allocations, see G.S. 122C-147.1 .

§ 122C-151. Responsibilities of those receiving appropriations.

  1. All resources allocated to and received by any area authority and used for programs of mental health, developmental disabilities, substance abuse or other related services are subject to the conditions specified in this Article and to the rules of the Commission and the Secretary and to the conditions of the Memorandum of Agreement specified in G.S. 122C-143.2 .
  2. If an area authority fails to complete actions necessary for the development of a Memorandum of Agreement, fails to file required reports within the time limit set by the Secretary, or fails to comply with any other requirements specified in this Article, the Secretary may:
    1. Delay payments; and
    2. With written notification of cause and subject to an appeal as provided by G.S. 122C-151.2 , reduce or deny payment of funds. Restoration of funds upon compliance is within the discretion of the Secretary.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 25; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 19; 1993, c. 321, s. 220(l).

§ 122C-151.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1993, c. 321, s. 220(n), as amended by Session Laws 1993 (Regular Session, 1994), c. 591, s. 7.

§ 122C-151.2. Appeal by area authorities and county programs.

  1. The area authority or county program may appeal to the Commission any action regarding rules under the jurisdiction of the Commission or rules under the joint jurisdiction of the Commission and the Secretary.
  2. The area authority or county program may appeal to the Secretary any action regarding rules under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
  3. Appeals shall be conducted according to rules adopted by the Commission and Secretary and in accordance with Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, ss. 7, 19; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; c. 614, s. 7; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 720, s. 3; 1993, c. 321, s. 220(m); 2001-437, s. 1.17(a).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

§ 122C-151.3. Dispute with area authorities or county programs.

  1. An area authority or county program shall establish written procedures for resolving disputes over decisions of an area authority or county program that may be appealed to the State MH/DD/SA Appeals Panel under G.S. 122C-151.4 . The procedures shall be informal and shall provide an opportunity for those who dispute the decision to present their position.
  2. This section does not apply to LME/MCOs, enrollees, applicants, providers of emergency services, or network providers subject to Chapter 108D of the General Statutes.

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(o); 2001-437, s. 1.17(b); 2013-397, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2013-397, s. 5, provides: “By September 30, 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services shall take any action necessary to implement this act, including submitting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services a Medicaid State Plan Amendment with a retroactive effective date of July 1, 2013. On or before September 30, 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services shall report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services on the status of the implementation of this act.”

Session Laws 2013-397, s. 11, made the amendment to this section by Session Laws 2013-397, s. 2, applicable to grievances and managed care actions filed on or after August 23, 2013.

§ 122C-151.4. Appeal to State MH/DD/SA Appeals Panel.

  1. Definitions. —  The following definitions apply in this section:
    1. Repealed by Session Laws 2021-88, s. 16(d), effective July 22, 2021.

      (1a) Client. — An individual who is admitted to or receiving public services from an area facility. The term includes the client’s personal representative or designee.

      (1b) Contract. — A contract with an area authority or county program to provide services, other than personal services, to clients and other recipients of services.

    2. Contractor. — A person that has a contract or that had a contract during the current fiscal year.
    3. Former contractor. — A person that had a contract during the previous fiscal year.
    4. Panel. — The State MH/DD/SA Appeals Panel established under this section.
  2. Appeals Panel. —  The State MH/DD/SA Appeals Panel is established. The Panel shall consist of three members appointed by the Secretary. The Secretary shall determine the qualifications of the Panel members. Panel members serve at the pleasure of the Secretary.
  3. Persons That May Appeal. —  The following persons may appeal to the Panel after having exhausted the appeals process at the appropriate area authority or county program:
    1. A contractor or a former contractor that claims that an area authority or county program is not acting or has not acted within applicable State law or rules in denying the contractor’s application for endorsement or in imposing a particular requirement on the contractor on fulfillment of the contract.
    2. A contractor or a former contractor that claims that a requirement of the contract substantially compromises the ability of the contractor to fulfill the contract.
    3. A contractor or former contractor that claims that an area authority or county program has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in reducing funding for the type of services provided or formerly provided by the contractor or former contractor.
    4. A client or a person who was a client in the previous fiscal year, who claims that an area authority or county program has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in reducing funding for the type of services provided or formerly provided to the client directly by the area authority or county program.
    5. A person that claims that an area authority or county program did not comply with a State law or a rule adopted by the Secretary or the Commission in developing the plans and budgets of the area authority or county program and that the failure to comply has adversely affected the ability of the person to participate in the development of the plans and budgets.
  4. Hearing. —  All members of the Panel shall hear an appeal to the Panel. An appeal shall be filed with the Panel within the time required by the Secretary and shall be heard by the Panel within the time required by the Secretary. A hearing shall be conducted at the place determined in accordance with the rules adopted by the Secretary. A hearing before the Panel shall be informal; no sworn testimony shall be taken and the rules of evidence do not apply. The person that appeals to the Panel has the burden of proof. The Panel shall not stay a decision of an area authority during an appeal to the Panel.
  5. Decision. —  The Panel shall make a written decision on each appeal to the Panel within the time set by the Secretary. A decision may direct a contractor, an area authority, or a county program to take an action or to refrain from taking an action, but it shall not require a party to the appeal to pay any amount except payment due under the contract. In making a decision, the Panel shall determine the course of action that best protects or benefits the clients of the area authority or county program. If a party to an appeal fails to comply with a decision of the Panel and the Secretary determines that the failure deprives clients of the area authority or county program of a type of needed service, the Secretary may use funds previously allocated to the area authority or county program to provide the service.
  6. Chapter 150B Appeal. —  A person that is dissatisfied with a decision of the Panel may commence a contested case under Article 3 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. Notwithstanding G.S. 150B-2(1b), an area authority or county program is considered an agency for purposes of the limited appeal authorized by this section. If the need to first appeal to the Panel is waived by the Secretary, a contractor may appeal directly to the Office of Administrative Hearings after having exhausted the appeals process at the appropriate area authority or county program.
  7. Limitation of Applicability. —  This section does not apply to LME/MCOs, enrollees, applicants, providers of emergency services, or network providers subject to Chapter 108D of the General Statutes.

History. 1993, c. 321, s. 220(o); 2001-437, s. 1.17(c); 2008-107, s. 10.15A(h); 2011-398, s. 40; 2012-66, s. 3; 2013-397, s. 3; 2021-88, s. 16(d).

Community Support Providers Appeals Process.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(e1)-(e4), as amended by Session Laws 2009-526, s. 2(c), and Session Laws 2009-550, s. 1.1(c), provides: “(e1) For the purpose of expediting the resolution of community support provider appeals and thereby saving State and federal funds that are paid for services that are found to be unnecessary or otherwise ineligible for payment, the Department shall implement on a temporary basis a community support provider appeals process. The process shall be a substitute for informal provider appeals at the Department level and formal provider appeals by the Office of Administrative Hearings. The community support provider appeals process shall apply to a community support services provider:

“(1) Who is aggrieved by a decision of the Department to reduce, deny, recoup, or recover reimbursement for community support services, or to deny, suspend, or revoke a provider agreement to provide community support services.

“(2) Whose endorsement has been withdrawn or whose application for endorsement has been denied by a local management entity.

“(e2) The community support provider appeals process shall be developed and implemented as follows:

“(1) A hearing under this section shall be commenced by filing a petition with the chief hearings clerk of the Department within 30 days of the mailing of the notice by the Department of the action giving rise to the contested case. The petition shall identify the petitioner, be signed by the party or representative of the party, and shall describe the agency action giving rise to the contested case. As used in this section, ‘file or filing’ means to place the paper or item to be filed into the care and custody of the chief hearings clerk of the Department and acceptance thereof by the chief hearings clerk, except that the hearing officer may permit the papers to be filed with the hearing officer, in which event the hearing officer shall note thereon the filing date. The Department shall supply forms for use in these contested cases.

“(2) If there is a timely request for an appeal, the Department shall promptly designate a hearing officer who shall hold an evidentiary hearing. The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing according to applicable federal law and regulations and shall ensure that:

“a. Notice of the hearing is given not less than 15 days before the hearing. The notice shall state the date, hour, and place of the hearing and shall be deemed to have been given on the date that a copy of the notice is mailed, via certified mail, to the address provided by the petitioner in the petition for hearing.

“b. The hearing is held in Wake County, except that the hearing officer may, take testimony and receive evidence by telephone or other electronic means. The petitioner and the petitioner’s legal representative may appear before the hearing officer in Wake County.

“c. Discovery is no more extensive or formal than that required by federal law and regulations applicable to the hearings. Prior to and during the hearing, a provider representative shall have adequate opportunity to examine the provider’s own case file. No later than five days before the date of the hearing, each party to a contested case shall identify each witness that the party intends to call.

“(3) The hearing officer shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations and regulate the conduct of the hearing. The following shall apply to hearings held pursuant to this section:

“a. At the hearing, the parties may present such sworn evidence, law, and regulations as are relevant to the issues in the case.

“b. The petitioner and the respondent agency each have a right to be represented by a person of his choice, including an attorney obtained at the party’s own expense.

“c. The petitioner and the respondent agency shall each have the right to cross-examine witnesses as well as make a closing argument summarizing his view of the case and the law.

“d. The appeal hearing shall be recorded. If a petition for judicial review is filed the Department shall include a copy of the recording of the hearing as part of the official record. The recording of the appeal hearing may be erased or otherwise destroyed 180 days after the final decision is mailed as provided in G.S. 108A-79(i)(5).

“(4) The hearing officer shall decide the case based upon a preponderance of the evidence, giving deference to the demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the agency as provided in G.S. 150B-34(a). The hearing officer shall prepare a proposal for the decision, citing relevant law, regulations, and evidence, which shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency.

“(5) The petitioner and the respondent agency shall have 15 days from the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision to present written arguments in opposition to or in support of the proposal for decision to the designated official of the Department who will make the final decision. If neither written arguments are presented, nor extension of time granted by the final agency decision maker for good cause, within 15 days of the date of the mailing of the proposal for decision, the proposal for decision becomes final. If written arguments are presented, such arguments shall be considered and the final decision shall be rendered. The final decision shall be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition. This time limit may be extended by agreement of the parties or by final agency decision maker, for good cause shown. The final decision shall be served upon the petitioner or the petitioner’s representative by certified mail, with a copy furnished to the respondent agency. In the absence of a petition for judicial review filed pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, the final decision shall be binding upon the petitioner and the Department.

“(6) A petitioner who is dissatisfied with the final decision of the Department may file, within 30 days of the service of the decision, a petition for judicial review in the Superior Court of Wake County or of the county from which the case arose. The judicial review shall be conducted according to Article 4 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.

“(7) In the event of a conflict between federal law or regulations and State law or regulations, federal law or regulations shall control. This section applies to all petitions that are filed by a Medicaid community support services provider on or after July 1, 2008, and for all Medicaid community support services provider petitions that have been filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings previous to July 1, 2008, but for which a hearing on the merits has not been commenced prior to that date. The requirement that the agency decision must be rendered not more than 180 days from the date of the filing of the petition for hearing shall not apply to (i) community support services provider petitions that were filed at the Office of Administrative Hearings or (ii) requests for a hearing under the Department’s informal settlement process prior to the effective date of this act. The Office of Administrative Hearings shall transfer all cases affected by this section to the Department of Health and Human Services within 30 days of the effective date of this section. This act preempts the existing informal appeal process and reconsideration review process at the Department of Health and Human Services and the existing appeal process at the Office of Administrative Hearings with regard to all appeals filed by Medicaid community support services providers under the Medical Assistance program.

“(e3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the Department of Health and Human Services may, pursuant to its statutory authority or federal Medicaid requirements, suspend the endorsement or Medicaid participation of a provider of community support services pending a final agency decision based on a fair hearing of the provider’s appeal filed with the Department under its community support provider appeal process. A provider of community support services whose endorsement, Medicaid participation, or services have been suspended is not entitled to payment during the period the appeal is pending, and the Department shall make no such payment to the provider during that period. If the final agency decision is in favor of the provider, the Department shall remove the suspension, commence payment for provider services, and reimburse the provider for payments withheld during the period of appeal. Contracts between the Department or a local management entity and the provider shall contain a provision indicating the circumstances under which a provider may appeal an agency decision and giving notice of the suspension of payments to the provider while the appeal is pending. This subsection applies to community support provider appeals pending in the Department of Health and Human Services or the Office of Administrative Hearings, as applicable, on and after July 1, 2008.

“(e4) The Department’s community support provider appeals process established under this section shall expire July 1, 2010. The Department shall report to the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Health and Human Services, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, and the Fiscal Research Division on March 1, 2009, October 1, 2009, and March 1, 2010, on the effectiveness and efficiency of the community support provider appeals process.”

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Some of the definitions in subsection (a) were renumbered at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes to maintain alphabetical order.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2008-107, s. 10.15A(h), effective July 1, 2008, inserted “or whose application for endorsement has been denied by an area authority or county program” in subdivision (a)(2); inserted “denying the contractor’s application for endorsement or in” in subdivision (c)(1); added the third sentence in subsection (f); and added subsection (g).

Session Laws 2021-88, s. 16(d), effective July 22, 2021, rewrote the section.

§ 122C-152. Liability insurance and waiver of immunity as to torts of agents, employees, and board members.

  1. An area authority, by securing liability insurance as provided in this section, may waive its governmental immunity from liability for damage by reason of death or injury to person or property caused by the negligence or tort of any agent, employee, or board member of the area authority when acting within the scope of his authority or within the course of his duties or employment. Governmental immunity is waived by the act of obtaining this insurance, but it is waived by only to the extent that the area authority is indemnified by insurance for the negligence or tort.
  2. Any contract of insurance purchased pursuant to this section shall be issued by a company or corporation licensed and authorized to execute insurance contracts in this State and shall by its terms adequately insure the area authority against any and all liability for any damages by reason of death or injury to a person or property proximately caused by the negligent acts or torts of the agents, employees, and board members of the area authority when acting within the course of their duties or employment. The area board shall determine the extent of the liability and what agents, employees by class, and board members are covered by any insurance purchased pursuant to this subsection. Any company or corporation that enters into a contract of insurance as described in this section with the authority, by this act waives any defense based upon the governmental immunity of the area authority.
  3. Any persons sustaining damages, or, in the case of death, his personal representative, may sue an area authority insured under this section for the recovery of damages in any court of competent jurisdiction in this State, but only in a county located within the geographic limits of the authority. It is no defense to any action that the negligence or tort complained of was in pursuance of a governmental or discretionary function of the area authority if, and to the extent that, the authority has insurance coverage as provided by this section.
  4. Except as expressly provided by subsection (c) of this section, nothing in this section deprives any area authority of any defense whatsoever to any action for damages or to restrict, limit, or otherwise affect any defense which the area authority may have at common law or by virtue of any statute. Nothing in this section relieves any person sustaining damages nor any personal representative of any decedent from any duty to give notice of a claim to the area authority or to commence any civil action for the recovery of damages within the applicable period of time prescribed or limited by statute.
  5. The area authority may incur liability pursuant to this section only with respect to a claim arising after the authority has procured liability insurance pursuant to this section and during the time when the insurance is in force.
  6. No part of the pleadings that relate to or allege facts as to a defendant’s insurance against liability may be read or mentioned in the presence of the trial jury in any action brought pursuant to this section. This liability does not attach unless the plaintiff waives the right to have all issues of law or fact relating to insurance in the action determined by a jury. These issues shall be heard and determined by the judge, and the jury shall be absent during any motions, arguments, testimony, or announcement of findings of fact or conclusions of law with respect to insurance.

History. 1981, c. 539, s. 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Sovereign Immunity Waived. —

Where sovereign immunity is waived by the purchase of liability insurance, subject matter jurisdiction is statutorily vested in the superior court. Meyer v. Walls, 122 N.C. App. 507, 471 S.E.2d 422, 1996 N.C. App. LEXIS 468 (1996), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 347 N.C. 97 , 489 S.E.2d 880, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 595 (1997).

§ 122C-153. Defense of agents, employees, and board members.

  1. Upon request made by or in behalf of any agent, employee, or board member or former agent, employee, or board member of the area authority, any area authority may provide for the defense of any civil or criminal action or proceeding brought against him either in his official or in his individual capacity, or both, on account of any act done or omission made, or any act allegedly done or omission allegedly made, in the scope and course of his duty as an agent, employee, or board member. The defense may be provided by the local board by employing counsel or by purchasing insurance that requires that the insurer provide the defense. Nothing in this section requires any area authority to provide for the defense of any action or proceeding of any nature.
  2. An area authority may budget funds for the purpose of paying all or part of the claim made or any civil judgment entered against any of its agents, employees, or board members or former agents, employees, or board members when a claim is made or judgment is rendered as damages on account of any act done or omission made, or any act allegedly done or omission allegedly made, in the scope and course of his duty as an agent, employee, or board member of the area authority. Nothing in this section shall authorize any area authority to budget funds for the purpose of paying any claim made or civil judgment against any of its agents, employees, or board members, or former agents, employees, or board members, if the authority finds that the agent, employee, or board member acted or failed to act because of actual fraud, corruption, or actual malice on his part. Any authority may budget for and purchase insurance coverage for payment of claims or judgments pursuant to this section. Nothing in this section requires any authority to pay any claim or judgment referred to, and the purchase of insurance coverage for payment of the claim or judgment may not be considered an assumption of any liability not covered by the insurance contract and may not be deemed an assumption of liability or payment of any claim or judgment in excess of the limits of coverage in the insurance contract.
  3. Subsection (b) of this section does not authorize an authority to pay all or part of a claim made or civil judgment entered or to provide a defense to a criminal charge unless (i) notice of the claim or litigation is given to the area authority before the time that the claim is settled or civil judgment is entered; and (ii) the area authority has adopted, and made available for public inspection, uniform standards under which claims made, civil judgments entered, or criminal charges against agents, employees, or board members or former agents, employees, or board members shall be defended or paid.
  4. The board or boards of county commissioners that establish the area authority and the Secretary may allocate funds not otherwise restricted by law, in addition to the funds allocated for the operation of the program, for the purpose of paying legal defense, judgments, and settlements under this section.

History. 1981, c. 539, s. 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-154. Personnel.

Employees under the direct supervision of the area director are employees of the area authority. For the purpose of personnel administration, Chapter 126 of the General Statutes applies unless otherwise provided in this Article. Employees appointed by the county program director are employees of the county. In a multicounty program, employment of county program staff shall be as agreed upon in the interlocal agreement adopted pursuant to G.S. 122C-115.1 . Notwithstanding G.S. 126-9(b), an employee of an area authority may be paid a salary that is in excess of the salary ranges established by the State Human Resources Commission. Any salary that is higher than the maximum of the applicable salary range shall be supported by documentation of comparable salaries in comparable operations within the region and shall also include the specific amount the board proposes to pay the employee. The area board shall not authorize any salary adjustment that is above the normal allowable salary range without obtaining prior approval from the Director of the Office of State Human Resources.

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 14; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2001-437, s. 1.18; 2012-151, s. 11(b); 2013-382, s. 9.1(c).

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

§ 122C-155. Supervision of services.

Unless otherwise specified, client services are the responsibility of a qualified professional. Direct medical and psychiatric services shall be provided by a qualified psychiatrist or a physician with adequate training and experience acceptable to the Secretary.

History. 1971, c. 470, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 568, s. 1; c. 679, s. 7; 1979, c. 358, s. 14; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-156. Salary plan for employees of the area authority.

  1. The area authority shall establish a salary plan which shall set the salaries for employees of the area authority. The salary plan shall be in compliance with Chapter 126 of the General Statutes. In a multi-county area, the salary plan shall not exceed the highest paying salary plan of any county in that area. In a single-county area, the salary plan shall not exceed the county’s salary plan. The salary plan limitations set forth in this section may be exceeded only if the area authority and the board or boards of county commissioners, as the case may be, jointly agree to exceed these limitations.
  2. An area authority may purchase life insurance or health insurance or both for the benefit of all or any class of authority officers or employees as a part of its compensation. An area authority may provide other fringe benefits for authority officers and employees.
  3. An area authority that is providing health insurance under subsection (b) of this section may provide health insurance for all or any class of former officers and employees of the area authority who are receiving benefits under Article 3 of Chapter 128 of the General Statutes. Health insurance may be paid entirely by the area authority, partly by the area authority and former officer or employee, or entirely by the former officer or employee, at the option of the area board.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, ss. 15, 23; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-157. Establishment of a professional reimbursement policy.

The area authority shall adopt and enforce a professional reimbursement policy. This policy shall (i) require that fees for the provision of services received directly under the supervision of the area authority shall be paid to the area authority, (ii) prohibit employees of the area authority from providing services on a private basis which require the use of the resources and facilities of the area authority, and (iii) provide that employees may not accept dual compensation and dual employment unless they have the written permission of the area authority.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 17; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-158. Privacy of personnel records.

  1. Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S. 132-6 or any other State statute concerning access to public records, personnel files of employees or applicants for employment maintained by an area authority are subject to inspection and may be disclosed only as provided by this section. For purposes of this section, an employee’s personnel file consists of any information in any form gathered by the area authority with respect to that employee, including his application, selection or nonselection, performance, promotions, demotions, transfers, suspensions and other disciplinary actions, evaluation forms, leave, salary, and termination of employment. As used in this section, “employee” includes former employees of the area authority.
  2. The following information with respect to each employee is a matter of public record:
    1. Name.
    2. Age.
    3. Date of original employment or appointment to the area authority.
    4. The terms of any contract by which the employee is employed whether written or oral, past and current, to the extent that the agency has the written contract or a record of the oral contract in its possession.
    5. Current position.
    6. Title.
    7. Current salary.
    8. Date and amount of each increase or decrease in salary with that area authority.
    9. Date and type  each promotion, demotion, transfer, suspension, separation, or other change in position classification with that area authority.
    10. Date and general description of the reasons for each promotion with that area authority.
    11. Date and type of each dismissal, suspension, or demotion for disciplinary reasons taken by the area authority. If the disciplinary action was a dismissal, a copy of the written notice of the final decision of the area authority setting forth the specific acts or omissions that are the basis of the dismissal.
    12. The office to which the employee is currently assigned.

      (b1) For the purposes of this subsection, the term “salary” includes pay, benefits, incentives, bonuses, and deferred and all other forms of compensation paid by the employing entity.

      (b2) The area authority shall determine in what form and by whom this information will be maintained. Any person may have access to this information for the purpose of inspection, examination, and copying during regular business hours, subject only to rules for the safekeeping of public records as the area authority may have adopted. Any person denied access to this information may apply to the appropriate division of the General Court of Justice for an order compelling disclosure, and the court shall have jurisdiction to issue these orders.

  3. All information contained in an employee’s personnel file, other than the information made public by subsection (b) of this section, is confidential and is open to inspection only in the following instances:
    1. The employee or an authorized agent may examine portions of his personnel file except (i) letters of reference solicited before employment, and (ii) information concerning a medical disability, mental or physical, that a prudent physician would not divulge to a patient.
    2. A licensed physician designated in writing by the employee may examine the employee’s medical record.
    3. An area authority employee having supervisory authority over the employee may examine all material in the employee’s personnel file.
    4. By order of a court of competent jurisdiction, any person may examine the part of an employee’s personnel file that is ordered by the court.
    5. An official of an agency of the State or federal government, or any political subdivision of the State, may inspect any part of a personnel file pursuant to G.S. 122C-25(b) or G.S. 122C-192(a) or when the inspection is considered by the official having custody of the records to be inspected to be necessary and essential to the pursuance of a proper function of the inspecting agency. No information may be divulged for the purpose of assisting in a criminal prosecution of the employee or for the purpose of assisting in an investigation of the employee’s tax liability. However, the official having custody of the records may release the name, address, and telephone number from a personnel file for the purpose of assisting in a criminal investigation.
    6. An employee may sign a written release, to be placed with the employee’s personnel file, that permits the person with custody of the file to provide, either in person, by telephone or by mail, information specified in the release to prospective employers, educational institutions, or other persons specified in the release.
    7. The area authority may tell any person of the employment or nonemployment, promotion, demotion, suspension, or other disciplinary action, reinstatement, transfer, or termination of an employee and the reasons for that personnel action. Before releasing the information, the area authority shall determine in writing that the release is essential to maintaining public confidence in the administration of services or to maintaining the level and quality of services. This written determination shall be retained as a record for public inspection and shall become part of the employee’s personnel file.
  4. Even if considered part of an employee’s personnel file, the following information need not be disclosed to an employee nor to any other person:
    1. Testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment, employment, or promotion in the area authority service, when disclosure would compromise the objectivity or the fairness of the testing or examination process.
    2. Investigative reports or memoranda and other information concerning the investigation of possible criminal action of an employee, until the investigation is completed and no criminal action taken, or until the criminal action is concluded.
    3. Information that might identify an undercover law-enforcement officer or a law-enforcement informer.
    4. Notes, preliminary drafts, and internal communications concerning an employee. In the event these materials are used for any official personnel decision, then the employee or an authorized agent has a right to inspect these materials.
  5. The area authority may permit access, subject to limitations it may impose, to selected personnel files by a professional representative of a training, research, or academic institution if that representative certifies that he will not release information identifying the employees whose files are opened and that the information will be used solely for statistical, research, or teaching purposes. This certification shall be retained by the area authority as long as each personnel file so examined is retained.
  6. The area authority that maintains personnel files containing information other than the information mentioned in subsection (b) of this section shall establish procedures whereby an employee who objects to material in the employee’s file on grounds that it is inaccurate or misleading may seek to have the material removed from the file or may place in the file a statement relating to the material.
  7. Permitting access, other than that authorized by this section, to a personnel file of an employee of an area authority is a Class 3 misdemeanor and is punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).
  8. Anyone who, knowing that he is not authorized to do so, examines, removes, or copies information in a personnel file of an employee of an area authority is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor and is punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).

History. 1983, c. 281; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, ss. 924, 925; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 2007-508, s. 3; 2010-169, s. 18(d).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-508, s. 3, effective August 30, 2007, in subsection (b), inserted “the terms of any contract by which the employee is employed whether written or oral, past and current, to the extent that the board has the written contract or a record of the oral contract in its possession” in the first sentence and added the second sentence.

Session Laws 2010-169, s. 18(d), effective October 1, 2010, subdivided subsection (b), adding the subdivision designations and making multiple stylistic changes; in subdivision (a)(8), substituted “each increase or decrease in salary with that area authority” for “most recent increase or decrease in salary”; in subdivision (a)(9), substituted “Date and type of each promotion” for “date of most recent promotion,” and added “with that area authority”; added subdivisions (a)(10) and (a)(11); and added the subsection (b1) and (b2) designations.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Fired by Liars: Due Process Implications in the Recent Changes to North Carolina’s Public Disclosure Laws,” 89 N.C.L. Rev. 2228 (2011).

§§ 122C-159 through 122C-169.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 4A. Consumer and Family Advisory Committees.

§ 122C-170. Local Consumer and Family Advisory Committees.

  1. Area authorities shall establish committees made up of consumers and family members to be known as Consumer and Family Advisory Committees (CFACS). A local CFAC shall be a self-governing and a self-directed organization that advises the area authority in its catchment area on the planning and management of the local public mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services system.Each CFAC shall adopt bylaws to govern the selection and appointment of its members, their terms of service, the number of members, and other procedural matters. At the request of either the CFAC or the governing board of the area authority, the CFAC and the governing board shall execute an agreement that identifies the roles and responsibilities of each party, channels of communication between the parties, and a process for resolving disputes between the parties.
  2. Each of the disability groups shall be equally represented on the CFAC, and the CFAC shall reflect as closely as possible the racial and ethnic composition of the catchment area. The terms of members shall be three years, and no member may serve more than three consecutive terms. The CFAC shall be composed exclusively of:
    1. Adult consumers of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services.
    2. Family members of consumers of mental health, intellectual and development disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services.
  3. The CFAC shall undertake all of the following:
    1. Review, comment on, and monitor the implementation of the contract deliverables between area authorities and the Department of Health and Human Services.
    2. Identify service gaps and underserved populations.
    3. Make recommendations regarding the service array and monitor the development of additional services.
    4. Review and comment on the area authority budget.
    5. Develop a collaborative and working relationship with the area authorities member advisory committees to obtain input related to service delivery and system change issues.
    6. Submit to the State Consumer and Family Advisory Committee findings and recommendations regarding ways to improve the delivery of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services, including Statewide issues.
  4. The director of the area authority shall provide sufficient staff to assist the CFAC in implementing its duties under subsection (c) of this section. The assistance shall include data for the identification of service gaps and underserved populations, training to review and comment on contract deliverables and budgets, procedures to allow participation in quality monitoring, and technical advice on rules of procedure and applicable laws.

History. 2006-142, s. 5; 2012-151, s. 5; 2021-77, s. 8.1.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 8.1, effective July 2, 2021, in subsection (a), deleted “and county programs” following “Area authorities” and “or county program” following “area authority”, and substituted “intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services” for “developmental disabilities, substance abuse services and”; substituted “authority” for “authority or county program” in the last paragraph of subsection (a); substituted “intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services” for “developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services” in subdivisions (b)(1) and (b)(2); substituted “contract deliverables between area authorities and the Department of Health and Human Services” for “local business plan” in subdivision (c)(1); deleted “or county program” following “authority” in subdivision (c)(4); rewrote subdivision (c)(5); substituted “intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services, including Statewide issues” for “developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services” in subdivision (c)(6); and in subsection (d), deleted “or county program” following “area authority” in the first sentence, and substituted “contract deliverables” for “business plans” in the second sentence.

§ 122C-171. State Consumer and Family Advisory Committee.

  1. There is established the State Consumer and Family Advisory Committee (State CFAC). The State CFAC shall be a self-governing and self-directed organization that advises the Department and the General Assembly on the planning and management of the State’s public mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services system.
  2. The State CFAC shall be composed of 21 members. The members shall be composed exclusively of adult consumers of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services and family members of consumers of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services. The terms of members shall be three years, and no member may serve more than two consecutive terms. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing authority. The members shall be appointed as follows:
    1. Nine members appointed by the Secretary. The Secretary’s appointments shall reflect each of the disability groups. The terms shall be staggered so that terms of three of the appointees expire each year.
    2. Four members appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate as follows:
      1. One member from the eastern region of the State.
      2. One member from the central region of the State.
      3. Two members from the western region of the State.

        The terms of the appointees shall be staggered so that the term of one appointee expires every year.

    3. Four members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives as follows:
      1. One member from the eastern region of the State.
      2. Two members from the central region of the State.
      3. One member from the western region of the State.

        The terms of the appointees shall be staggered so that the term of one appointee expires every year.

    4. Repealed by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 4(a), effective July 2, 2021, and applicable only to appointments to the Consumer and Family Advisory Committee made on or after that date.
    5. Four members appointed by the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners as follows:
      1. Two members from the eastern region of the State.
      2. One member from the central region of the State.
      3. One member from the western region of the State.

        The terms of the appointees shall be staggered so that the term of one appointee expires every year.

  3. The State CFAC shall undertake all of the following:
    1. Review, comment on, and monitor the implementation of the State Plan for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services.
    2. Identify service gaps and underserved populations.
    3. Make recommendations regarding the service array and monitor the development of additional services.
    4. Review and comment on the State budget for mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services.
    5. Review and comment on contract deliverables and the process and outcomes of prepaid health plans in meeting these contract deliverables.
    6. Receive the findings and recommendations by local CFACs regarding ways to improve the delivery of mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services, including Statewide issues.
    7. Develop a collaborative and working relationship with the prepaid health plan member advisory committees to obtain input related to service delivery and system change issues.
  4. The Secretary shall provide sufficient staff to assist the State CFAC in implementing its duties under subsection (c) of this section. The assistance shall include data for the identification of service gaps and underserved populations, training to review and comment on the State Plan and departmental budget, procedures to allow participation in quality monitoring, and technical advice on rules of procedure and applicable laws.
  5. State CFAC members shall receive the per diem and allowances prescribed by G.S. 138-5 for State boards and commissions.

History. 2006-142, s. 5; 2009-50, s. 1; 2021-77, s. 4(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 4(b), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-77, s. 4(a), effective July 2, 2021, and applicable only to appointments to the Consumer and Family Advisory Committee made on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-50, s. 1, effective January 1, 2010, deleted “General Assembly upon the recommendation of the” following “Three by the” in subdivisions (b)(2) and (b)(3).

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 4(a), rewrote subsections (a), and (b); substituted “intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services” for “developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services” in subdivision (c)(4); rewrote subdivision (c)(5); substituted “intellectual and developmental disabilities, substance use disorder, and traumatic brain injury services, including Statewide issues” for “developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services” in subdivision (c)(6); and rewrote subdivision (c)(7). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§§ 122C-172 through 122C-180.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 5. State Facilities.

§ 122C-181. Secretary’s jurisdiction over State facilities.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary shall operate the following facilities:
    1. Psychiatric Hospitals:
      1. Cherry Hospital.

        a1. Central Regional Hospital.

      2. , c.Repealed by Session Laws 2007-177, s. 2. See Editor’s note.

        d. Broughton Hospital.

    2. Developmental Centers:
      1. Caswell Developmental Center.
      2. Repealed by Session Laws 2007-177, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007.

        b1. J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center.

      3. Murdoch Developmental Center.
      4. through e. Repealed by Session Laws 2007-177, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007.
    3. Alcohol and Drug Treatment Centers:
      1. Walter B. Jones Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center.
      2. Repealed by Session Laws 2007-177, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007.
      3. Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center.
      4. R.J. Blackley Alcohol and Drug Treatment Center.
    4. Neuro-Medical Treatment Centers:
      1. through c. Repealed by Session Laws 2007-177, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007.

        d. Black Mountain Neuro-Medical Treatment Center.

        e. O’Berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center.

        f. Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center.

    5. Residential Programs for Children:
      1. Whitaker School.
      2. Wright School.
  2. Subject to the requirements of subsection (c) of this section, the Secretary may, with the approval of the Governor and Council of State, close any State facility.
  3. Closure of a State facility under subsection (b) of this section becomes effective on the earlier of the 31st legislative day or the day of adjournment of the next regular session of the General Assembly that begins at least 10 days after the date the closure is approved, unless a different effective date applies under this subsection. If a bill that specifically disapproves the State facility closure is introduced in either house of the General Assembly before the thirty-first legislative day of that session, the closure becomes effective on the earlier of either the day an unfavorable final action is taken on the bill or the day that session of the General Assembly adjourns without ratifying a bill that specifically disapproves the State facility closure. If the Secretary specifies a later effective date for closure than the date that would otherwise apply under this subsection, the later date applies. Closure of a State facility does not become effective if the closure is specifically disapproved by a bill enacted into law before it becomes effective. Notwithstanding any rule of either house of the General Assembly, any member of the General Assembly may introduce a bill during the first 30 legislative days of any regular session to disapprove closure of a facility that has been approved by the Governor and Council of State as provided in subsection (b) of this section. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair the Secretary’s power or duty otherwise imposed by law to close a State facility temporarily for the protection of health and safety.

History. Code, ss. 2227, 2240; 1899, c. 1, s. 1; Rev., s. 4542; C.S., s. 6151; 1945, c. 952, s. 8; 1947, c. 537, s. 2; 1949, c. 1206, s. 1; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1959, c. 348, s. 1; c. 1002, s. 1; c. 1008; c. 1028, ss. 1-4; 1961, c. 513; c. 1173, ss. 1, 2, 4; 1963, c. 1166, ss. 2, 10, 12; c. 1184, s. 6; 1967, c. 151; 1969, c. 982; 1973, c. 476, ss. 128, 133, 138; 1975, c. 19, s. 41; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; c. 77; c. 412, s. 4; 1983, c. 383, s. 9; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 145, s. 1; 1991, c. 689, s. 136; 2001-437, s. 1.19; 2001-487, s. 80(a); 2007-177, ss. 1, 2.

Editor’s Note.

For preamble to Session Laws 2001-437, see the note at G.S. 122C-2 .

Session Laws 2003-314, s. 3.1, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall maintain all existing educational and research programs in psychiatry and psychology conducted at Dorothea Dix Hospital and John Umstead Hospital by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine and by the Psychology Department within the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, unless the programs are otherwise modified by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine or the College of Arts and Sciences. The University of North Carolina School of Medicine shall retain authority over all educational and research programs in psychiatry and the University of North Carolina College of Arts and Sciences shall retain authority over all educational and research programs in psychology conducted at these hospitals and at any new State psychiatric hospital. The Secretary shall consult with the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in programmatic, operational, and facility planning of the new psychiatric hospital to ensure appropriate patient treatment and continuation of educational and research programs conducted by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. In addition, the Secretary shall consult with the University of North Carolina College of Arts and Sciences to ensure appropriate continuation of educational and research programs conducted by the University of North Carolina College of Arts and Sciences.”

For prior similar provisions, see Session Laws 2002-159, s. 91.

Session Laws 2007-177, s. 2, added subdivision (a)(1)a1. and deleted subdivisions (a)(1)b. and (a)(1)c., contingently effective upon the closure of the Dorothea Dix Hospital and the termination of service to psychiatric patients. The Revisor of Statutes is informed that the hospital is closed, and that patients are no longer being served there.

Session Laws 2007-177, s. 5, provides: “Section 2 of this act becomes effective when the Dorothea Dix Hospital is closed and is no longer serving psychiatric patients. The remainder of this act is effective when it becomes law.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-177, s. 1, effective July 5, 2007, rewrote subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(4) and added subdivision (a)(5).

Session Laws 2007-177, s. 2, effective when the Dorothea Dix Hospital is closed and is no longer serving psychiatric patients, added subdivision (a)(1)a1 and deleted subdivisions (a)(1)b and (a)(1)c.

CASE NOTES

As a licensed dentist employed at a State mental hospital, petitioner was bound to follow both the rules and regulations of the Department of Human Resources, which regulate employees at those institutions, and the rules and regulations of the Board of Dental Examiners, which regulates the practice of all dentists practicing in North Carolina. Woodlief v. North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Exmrs., 104 N.C. App. 52, 407 S.E.2d 596, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 970 (1991).

§ 122C-182. Authority to contract with area authorities.

To establish a coordinated system of services for its clients, a State facility shall contract with an area authority. Contracted services shall meet the rules of the Commission and the Secretary.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-183. Appointment of employees as police officers who may arrest without warrant.

The director of each State facility may appoint as special police officers the number of employees of their respective facilities they consider necessary. Within the grounds of the State facility the employees appointed as special police officers have all the powers of police officers of cities. The Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, may assign these special police officers to other State-operated facilities on a temporary basis to carry out the powers allowed under this section and as otherwise provided by laws relating to the specific joint security force to which they are assigned. Upon this temporary assignment, the special police officer will take the oath in G.S. 122C-184 for that specific facility. Following the oath, the police officer has the right to arrest without warrant individuals committing violations of the State law or the ordinances or rules of that facility in their presence and to bring the offenders before a magistrate who shall proceed as in other criminal cases.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 55; 1901, c. 627; Rev., s. 4569; C.S., s. 6181; 1921, c. 207; 1957, c. 1232, s. 12; 1959, c. 1002, s. 12; 1973, c. 108, s. 73; c. 673, s. 12.1; 1981, c. 635, s. 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2019-240, s. 19(a).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(a), effective November 6, 2019, added the third and fourth sentences and in the fifth sentence substituted “Following the oath, the police officer has” for “They have.”

§ 122C-184. Oath of special police officers.

Before exercising the duties of a special police officer, the employees appointed under G.S. 122C-183 shall take an oath or affirmation of office before an officer empowered to administer oaths. The oath or affirmation shall be filed with the records of the Department. The oath or affirmation of office is:

State of North Carolina: County. I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will well and truly execute the duties of office of special police officer in and for the State facility called , according to the best of my skill and ability and according to law; and that I will use my best endeavors to enforce all the ordinances of said facility, and to suppress nuisances, and to suppress and prevent disorderly conduct within these grounds. So help me, God. Sworn and subscribed before me, this day of , A.D. .

Click to view

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 56; 1901, c. 627; Rev., s. 4570; C.S., s. 6182; 1963, c. 1166, s. 11; 1973, c. 108, s. 74; c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-185. Application of funds belonging to State facilities.

  1. All moneys and proceeds of property donated to any State facility shall be deposited into the State treasury and accounted for in the appropriate fund as determined by the Secretary and approved by the Office of State Budget and Management. All moneys and proceeds of property donated in which there are special directions for their application and the interest earned on these funds shall be spent as the donor has directed and except as required for deposit with the State treasury, shall not be subject to the provisions of the State Budget Act except for capital improvements projects which shall be authorized and executed in accordance with G.S. 143C-8-8 and G.S. 143C-8-9 .
  2. Proceeds from the transfer or sale of surplus, obsolete, or unused equipment of State facilities shall be deposited and accounted for in accordance with G.S. 143-49(4).
  3. The net proceeds from the sale, lease, rental, or other disposition of real estate owned by a State facility shall be deposited and accounted for in accordance with G.S. 146-30 .
  4. All proceeds from the operation of vending facilities as defined in G.S. 111-42(d) and operated by State facilities shall be deposited and accounted for in accordance with the State Budget Act, Chapter 143C of the General Statutes.
  5. All other revenues and other receipts collected by a State facility shall be deposited to the credit of the State treasury in accordance with G.S. 147-77 .

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 34; Rev., s. 4552; C.S., s. 6167; 1963, c. 1166, s. 13; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2000-140, s. 93.1(a); 2001-424, s. 12.2(b); 2006-203, s. 68.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2006-203, s. 126, provides, in part: “Prosecutions for offenses committed before the effective date of this act are not abated or affected by this act, and the statutes that would be applicable but for this act remain applicable to those prosecutions.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-203, s. 68, effective July 1, 2007, and applicable to the budget for the 2007-2009 biennium and each subsequent biennium thereafter, in subsection (a), substituted “State Budget Act” for “Executive Budget Act,” and substituted “G.S. 143C-8-8 and G.S. 143C-8-9 ” for “G.S. 143-18.1”; and in subsection (d), substituted “the State Budget Act, Chapter 143C of the General Statutes” for “G.S. 143-12.1.”

§ 122C-186. General Assembly visitors of State facilities.

The members of the General Assembly are ex officio visitors of all State facilities, provided that the common law right of visitation of a State facility is abrogated to the extent that it does not include the right to access to confidential information. This right of access is only as granted by statute.

History. 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-187 through 122C-190.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 6. Quality Assurance.

§ 122C-191. Quality of services.

  1. The assurance that services provided are of the highest possible quality within available resources is an obligation of the area authority and the Secretary.
  2. Each area authority and State facility shall comply with the rules of the Commission regarding quality assurance activities, including: program evaluation; utilization and peer review; and staff qualifications, privileging, supervision, education, and training. These rules may not nullify compliance otherwise required by Chapter 126 of the General Statutes.
  3. Each area authority and State facility shall develop internal processes to monitor and evaluate the level of quality obtained by all its programs and services including the activities prescribed in the rules of the Commission.
  4. The Secretary shall develop rules for a review process to monitor area facilities and State facilities for compliance with the required quality assurance activities as well as other rules of the Commission and the Secretary. The rules may provide that the Secretary has the authority to determine whether applicable standards of practice have been met.
  5. For purposes of peer review functions only:
    1. A member of a duly appointed quality assurance committee who acts without malice or fraud shall not be subject to liability for damages in any civil action on account of any act, statement, or proceeding undertaken, made, or performed within the scope of the functions of the committee.
    2. The proceedings of a quality assurance committee, the records and materials it produces, and the material it considers shall be confidential and not considered public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 , “ ‘Public records’ defined,” and shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action against a facility or a provider of professional health services that results from matters which are the subject of evaluation and review by the committee. No person who was in attendance at a meeting of the committee shall be required to testify in any civil action as to any evidence or other matters produced or presented during the proceedings of the committee or as to any findings, recommendations, evaluations, opinions, or other actions of the committee or its members. However, information, documents or records otherwise available are not immune from discovery or use in a civil action merely because they were presented during proceedings of the committee, and nothing herein shall prevent a provider of professional health services from using such otherwise available information, documents or records in connection with an administrative hearing or civil suit relating to the medical staff membership, clinical privileges or employment of the provider. Documents otherwise available as public records within the meaning of G.S. 132-1 do not lose their status as public records merely because they were presented or considered during proceedings of the committee. A member of the committee or a person who testifies before the committee may be subpoenaed and be required to testify in a civil action as to events of which the person has knowledge independent of the peer review process, but cannot be asked about the person’s testimony before the committee for impeachment or other purposes or about any opinions formed as a result of the committee hearings.
    3. Peer review information that is confidential and is not subject to discovery or use in civil actions under this section may be released to a professional standards review organization that contracts with an agency of this State or the federal government to perform any accreditation or certification function, including the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Information released under this subdivision shall be limited to that which is reasonably necessary and relevant to the standards review organization’s determination to grant or continue accreditation or certification. Information released under this subdivision retains its confidentiality and is not subject to discovery or use in any civil actions as provided under this subsection, and the standards review organization shall keep the information confidential subject to this section.

History. 1977, c. 568, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 1; 1983, c. 383, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1053, s. 1; 1998-212, s. 12.35C(d); 1999-222, s. 1; 2004-149, s. 2.7.

Cross References.

As to provisions pertaining to medical review committees, see G.S. 131E-95 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-149, s. 2.7, effective August 2, 2004, in subdivision (e)(2), inserted the fourth sentence, and substituted a gender neutral term; in subdivision (e)(3), twice substituted “this section” for “subdivision (2) of this subsection,” added “including the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations” at the end of the first sentence, and in the second sentence, substituted “this section” for “that subdivision.”

§ 122C-192. Review and protection of information.

  1. Notwithstanding G.S. 8-53 , G.S. 8-53.3 , or any other law relating to confidentiality of communications involving a patient or client, as needed to ensure quality assurance activities, the Secretary may review any writing or other record concerning the admission, discharge, medication, treatment, medical condition, or history of a client of an area authority or State facility. The Secretary may also review the personnel records of employees of an area authority or State facility.
  2. An area authority, State facility, its employees, and any other individual interviewed in the course of an inspection are immune from liability for damages resulting from disclosure of any information to the Secretary.Except as required by law, it is unlawful for the Secretary or his representative to disclose:
    1. Any confidential or privileged information obtained under this section unless the client or his legally responsible person authorizes disclosure in writing; or
    2. The name of anyone who has furnished information concerning an area authority or State facility without that individual’s consent.Violation of this subsection is a Class 3 misdemeanor punishable only by a fine, not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00).
  3. The Secretary shall adopt rules to ensure that unauthorized disclosure does not occur.
  4. All confidential or privileged information obtained under this section and the names of individuals providing such information are not public records under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 926; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).

§ 122C-193.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 7. Contested Case Hearings for Eligible Assaultive and Violent Children.

§§ 122C-194 through 122C-200. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2000-67, s. 11.21(e), effective July 1, 2000.

Article 5. Procedures for Admission and Discharge of Clients.

Part 1. General Provisions.

§ 122C-201. Declaration of policy.

It is State policy to encourage voluntary admissions to facilities. It is further State policy that no individual shall be involuntarily committed to a 24-hour facility unless that individual is mentally ill or a substance abuser and dangerous to self or others. All admissions and commitments shall be accomplished under conditions that protect the dignity and constitutional rights of the individual.

It is further State policy that, except as provided in G.S. 122C-212(b), individuals who have been voluntarily admitted shall be discharged upon application and that involuntarily committed individuals shall be discharged as soon as a less restrictive mode of treatment is appropriate.

History. 1973, c. 723, s. 1; c. 726, s. 1; c. 1084; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, ss. 2, 11; 1983, c. 638, s. 1; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For article on the result of the 1979 statutory changes in involuntary civil commitment in North Carolina, see 60 N.C.L. Rev. 985 (1982).

For article on the attorney’s role in involuntary civil commitment in North Carolina, see 60 N.C.L. Rev. 1027 (1982).

For note discussing the overinclusive and underinclusive nature of the North Carolina involuntary civil commitment system, see 63 N.C.L. Rev. 241 (1984).

For article discussing involuntary commitment of the mentally disabled, see 14 N.C. Cent. L.J. 406 (1984).

For note on the duty to commit dangerous mental patients, see 66 N.C.L. Rev. 1311 (1988).

For note, “Helplessly Imprisoned: State v. Hammonds Holds Involuntarily Committed Patients to the Same Constitutional Restraints as Prisoners,” see 38 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 173 (2016).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Most of the cases cited below were decided under former statutory provisions.

Constitutionality. —

The statutory scheme for involuntary commitment is constitutional. In re Jackson, 60 N.C. App. 581, 299 S.E.2d 677, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2504 (1983); French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

The North Carolina General Assembly has enacted an excellent legislative scheme which adequately protects the interests of all who may be involved in an involuntary commitment proceeding. In re Jackson, 60 N.C. App. 581, 299 S.E.2d 677, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2504 (1983).

Public Policy to Prevent Unnecessary Commitments. —

The policy of this State is to prevent the possibility that persons who are not mentally ill or inebriates and dangerous to themselves or others would be involuntarily committed. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Purpose of Involuntary Commitment Proceeding. —

The primary purpose of an involuntary commitment proceeding is to protect the person who, after due process, has been found to be both mentally ill and imminently dangerous, by placing such a person in more protected environment where the danger may be minimized and his treatment facilitated; in a real sense the proceeding is an important step in his medical and psychiatric treatment. In re Farrow, 41 N.C. App. 680, 255 S.E.2d 777, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2728 (1979).

Two purposes for the involuntary commitment statute are (1) to allow temporary withdrawal from society of those who may be dangerous and (2) to provide treatment. In re Medlin, 59 N.C. App. 33, 295 S.E.2d 604, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2855 (1982).

An involuntary commitment proceeding is a proceeding of a civil nature which is governed by pertinent Rules of Civil Procedure. In re Underwood, 38 N.C. App. 344, 247 S.E.2d 778, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2179 (1978).

Requirements for Entering Commitment Order. —

To enter a commitment order, the trial court is required to ultimately find two distinct facts, i.e., that the respondent is mentally ill and is dangerous to himself or to others. In re Collins, 49 N.C. App. 243, 271 S.E.2d 72, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3374 (1980).

Requirement That Person Be Dangerous. —

By requiring that the person be found dangerous to himself or others, the legislature has made it clear that involuntary commitment is not for all those who are mentally ill, or even for those whose mental illness may make it necessary for them to have custodial care. In re Doty, 38 N.C. App. 233, 247 S.E.2d 628, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2136 (1978).

Where doctor testified only that the respondent was unable to care for herself and that she was a complete nursing care problem, and there was no showing that the respondent was dangerous to herself, the requirements for involuntary commitment were not met. In re Doty, 38 N.C. App. 233, 247 S.E.2d 628, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2136 (1978).

Standard of Commitment for Minors. —

Former Chapter 122 was written to provide constitutionally defensible procedural and evidentiary rules. To allow juvenile court judges to commit minors to mental institutions with a lesser standard than that set forth in former Chapter 122 would subject such commitments to constitutional challenge as a deprivation of liberty without due process of law. In re Mikels, 31 N.C. App. 470, 230 S.E.2d 155, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2019 (1976).

Negligent Failure to Commit. —

For case in which federal district court adopted a “psychotherapist judgment rule” in considering alleged negligent failure to have patient involuntarily committed, see Currie v. United States, 644 F. Supp. 1074, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19491 (M.D.N.C. 1986), aff'd, 836 F.2d 209, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16735 (4th Cir. 1987).

Jury Adequately Charged Regarding Procedures Under Acquittal on Grounds of Insanity. —

Pattern jury instruction in N.C.P.I.-Crim. 304.10, which informed the jury of the commitment hearing procedures in G.S. 15A-1321 and 15A-1322 pursuant to this Article, adequately charged the jury regarding procedures under acquittal on the ground of insanity. State v. Allen, 322 N.C. 176 , 367 S.E.2d 626, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 295 (1988).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

EDITOR’S NOTE.— The opinions below were rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-202. Applicability of Article.

This Article applies to all facilities unless expressly provided otherwise. Specific provisions that are delineated by the disability of the client, whether the client has a mental illness, has an intellectual or other developmental disability, or is a substance abuser, also apply to all facilities for that client’s disability. Provisions that refer to a specific facility or type of facility apply only to the designated facility or facilities.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 20; 2019-76, s. 4.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 4 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 4, substituted “the client has a mental illness, has an intellectual or other developmental disability, or is a” for “mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, or”. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-202.1. Hospital privileges.

Nothing in this Article related to admission, commitment, or treatment shall be deemed to mandate hospitals to grant or deny to any individuals privileges to practice in hospitals.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-202.2. LME/MCO community crisis services plan; commitment examiners; transporting agencies; training; collaboration.

  1. Every LME/MCO shall adopt a community crisis services plan in accordance with this section to facilitate first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location required pursuant to Parts 7 and 8 of this Article within its catchment area. The community crisis services plan for the LME/MCO’s catchment area shall be comprised of separate plans, known as “local area crisis services plans” for each of the local areas or regions within the catchment area that the LME/MCO identifies as an appropriate local planning area, taking into consideration the available resources and interested stakeholders within a particular geographic area or region of the catchment area. Each LME/MCO may determine the number and geographic boundaries of the local planning areas within its catchment area. Each local area crisis services plan shall, for the local area covered by the local plan, do at least all of the following:
    1. Incorporate the involuntary commitment transportation agreement adopted pursuant to G.S. 122C-251(g) for the cities and counties within the local planning areas which identifies the law enforcement officers, designees under G.S. 122C-251(g), or individuals or entities otherwise required to provide custody and transportation of a respondent for a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location required by G.S. 122C-263 (a) and G.S. 122C-283 . Notwithstanding the foregoing, counties and cities shall retain the responsibilities for custody and transportation set forth in this Article, except as otherwise set forth in a plan developed, agreed upon, and adopted in compliance with this section and G.S. 122C-251(g).
    2. Identify one or more area facilities or other locations in accordance with G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-283 . Each LME/MCO shall contract with one or more facilities or other locations described in G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-283 for the provision of health screenings and first examinations required by G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-283 for the provision of first examination in conjunction with a health screening required by G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-283, to meet the needs of its local planning area.
    3. Identify available training for law enforcement personnel and other persons designated or required under G.S. 122C-251(g) to provide transportation and custody of involuntary commitment respondents. Law enforcement officers may request to participate in the training program identified by the LME/MCO. Persons who are designated in compliance with G.S. 122C-251(g) to provide all or part of the transportation and custody required for involuntary commitment proceedings under this Article and who are not law enforcement officers shall participate in the training. To the extent feasible, the identified training shall address the use of de-escalation strategies and techniques, the safe use of force and restraint, respondent rights relevant to custody and transportation, the location of any area facilities identified by the LME/MCO pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection, and the completion and return of the custody order to the clerk of superior court. The training identified by the LME/MCO may be comprised of one or more programs and may include a Crisis Intervention Team program or other mental health training program or a combination of these programs.
  2. Law enforcement agencies, acute care hospitals, magistrates, area facilities with identified commitment examiners, and other affected agencies shall participate with the LME/MCO in the development of the local area crisis services plans described in this section. Other stakeholders and community partners identified by the LME/MCO may be invited to participate in the planning. No local area crisis services plan developed under this section shall be adopted or thereafter be effective or implemented unless such plan first has been mutually agreed upon in writing by all entities identified in the plan pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. If any member of the Crisis Planning Committee fails to agree to the plan in writing, the Secretary shall develop a procedure to attempt to resolve the conflict in order to achieve approval of the Plan.
  3. The plans adopted under this section may, by mutual agreement of all entities identified in the plan, address any other matters necessary to facilitate the custody, transportation, examination, and treatment of respondents to commitment proceedings under Parts 7 and 8 of this Article.

History. 2018-33, s. 8.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made this section effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 44, provides: “Each LME/MCO shall submit to the Department of Health and Human Services a copy of its current community crisis services plan adopted pursuant to G.S. 122C-202.2 , as enacted by this act, by the earlier of (i) 12 months after the date the Department receives notification that the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services has approved all necessary waivers and State Plan amendments for Medicaid and NC Health Choice transformation as provided for in S.L. 2015-245, as amended, or (ii) six months prior to the date the Department actually initiates capitated contracts with Prepaid Health Plans, as defined in Section 4 of S.L. 2015-245, as amended, for the delivery of Medicaid and NC Health Choice services. The Department shall notify each LME/MCO when the earlier of these conditions occurs.” Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(j), effective November 6, 2019, repealed Session Laws 2018-33, s. 44.

§ 122C-203. Admission or commitment and incompetency proceedings to have no effect on one another.

The admission or commitment to a facility of an individual who allegedly has a mental illness, an alleged substance abuser, or an individual who allegedly has an intellectual or other developmental disability under the provisions of this Article shall in no way affect incompetency proceedings as set forth in Chapter 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes and incompetency proceedings under those Chapters shall have no effect upon admission or commitment proceedings under this Article.

History. 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 21; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 26(b); 2019-76, s. 5.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 5 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 5, rewrote this section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-204. Civil liability for corruptly attempting admission or commitment.

Nothing in this Article relieves from liability in any suit instituted in the courts of this State any individual who unlawfully, maliciously, and corruptly attempts to admit or commit any individual to any facility under this Article.

History. 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-205. Return of clients to 24-hour facilities.

  1. When a client of a 24-hour facility who:
    1. Has been involuntarily committed;
    2. Is being detained pending a judicial hearing;
    3. Has been voluntarily admitted but is a minor or incompetent adult;
    4. Has been placed on conditional release from the facility; or
    5. Has been involuntarily committed or voluntarily admitted and is the subject of a detainer placed with the 24-hour facility by an appropriate official

      escapes or breaches a condition of his release, if applicable, the responsible professional shall notify or cause to be notified immediately the appropriate law enforcement agency in the county of residence of the client, the appropriate law enforcement agency in the county where the facility is located, and the appropriate law enforcement agency in any county where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the client may be found. The responsible professional shall determine the amount of personal identifying and background information reasonably necessary to divulge to the law enforcement agency or agencies under the particular circumstances involved in order to assure the expeditious return of the client to the 24-hour facility involved and protect the general public.

  2. When a competent adult who has been voluntarily admitted to a 24-hour facility escapes or breaches a condition of his release, the responsible professional, in the exercise of accepted professional judgment, practice, and standards, will determine if it is reasonably foreseeable that:
    1. The client may cause physical harm to others or himself;
    2. The client may cause damage to property;
    3. The client may commit a felony or a violent misdemeanor; or
    4. That the health or safety of the client may be endangered

      unless he is immediately returned to the facility. If the responsible professional finds that any or all of these occurrences are reasonably foreseeable, he will follow the same procedures as those set forth in subsection (a) of this section.

  3. Upon receipt of notice of an escape or breach of a condition of release as described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, an appropriate law enforcement officer shall take the client into custody and have the client returned to the 24-hour facility from which the client has escaped or has been conditionally released. Transportation of the client back to the 24-hour facility shall be provided in the same manner as described in G.S. 122C-251 and G.S. 122C-408(b) . Law enforcement agencies who are notified of a client’s escape or breach of conditional release shall be notified of the client’s return by the responsible 24-hour facility. Under the circumstances described in this section, the initial notification by the 24-hour facility of the client’s escape or breach of conditional release shall be given by telephone communication to the appropriate law enforcement agency or agencies and, if available and appropriate, by Department of Public Safety message to any law enforcement agency in or out of state and by entry into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) telecommunications system. As soon as reasonably possible following notification, written authorization to take the client into custody shall also be issued by the 24-hour facility. Under this section, law enforcement officers shall have the authority to take a client into custody upon receipt of the telephone notification or Department of Public Safety message prior to receiving written authorization. The notification of a law enforcement agency does not, in and of itself, render this information public information within the purview of Chapter 132 of the General Statutes. However, the responsible law enforcement agency shall determine the extent of disclosure of personal identifying and background information reasonably necessary, under the circumstances, in order to assure the expeditious return of a client to the 24-hour facility involved and to protect the general public and is authorized to make such disclosure. The responsible law enforcement agency may also place any appropriate message or entry into either the Department of Public Safety’s Criminal Information System or National Crime Information System, or both, as appropriate.
  4. In the situations described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the responsible professional shall also notify or cause to be notified as soon as practicable:
    1. The next of kin of the client or legally responsible person for the client;
    2. The clerk of superior court of the county of commitment of the client;
    3. The area authority of the county of residence of the client, if appropriate;
    4. The physician or eligible psychologist who performed the first examination for a commitment of the client, if appropriate; and
    5. Any official who has placed a detainer on a client as described in subdivision (a)(5) of this section

      of the escape or breach of condition of the client’s release upon occurrence of either action and of his subsequent return to the facility.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 27; Rev., s. 4563; C.S., s. 6175; 1927, c. 114; 1945, c. 952, s. 12; 1953, c. 256, s. 1; 1955, c. 887, s. 3; 1973, c. 673, s. 11; 1983, c. 548; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, ss. 12-14; 1987, c. 749, s. 1; 2014-100, s. 17.1(eee).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 17.1(eee), effective July 1, 2014, in subsection (c), substituted “Department of Public Safety” for “Division of Criminal Information (DCI)” or similar language in the fourth and sixth sentences, and substituted “Department of Public Safety’s Criminal Information System” for “Division of Criminal Information System” in the last sentence.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Protection Rights. See opinion of Attorney General to Lena Davis, Broughton Hospital, 41 N.C.A.G. 900 (1972), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-205.1. Discharge of clients who escape or breach the condition of release.

  1. As described in G.S. 122C-205(a), when a client of a 24-hour facility escapes or breaches the condition of his release and does not return to the facility, the facility shall:
    1. If the client was admitted under Part 2 of this Article or under Parts 3 or 4 of this Article to a nonrestrictive facility, discharge the client based on the professional judgment of the responsible professional;
    2. If the client was admitted under Part 3 or Part 4 of this Article to a restrictive facility, discharge the client when the period for continued treatment, as specified by the court, expires;
    3. If the client was admitted pending a district court hearing under Part 7 of this Article, request that the court consider dismissal or continuance of the case at the initial district court hearing; or
    4. If the client was committed under Part 7 of this Article, discharge the client when the commitment expires.
  2. As described in G.S. 122C-205(a), when a client of a 24-hour facility who was admitted under Part 8 of this Article escapes or breaches the conditions of his release and does not return to the facility, the facility may discharge the client from the facility based on the professional judgment of the responsible professional and following consultation with the appropriate area authority or physician.
  3. Upon discharge of the client, the 24-hour facility shall notify all the persons directed to be notified of the client’s escape or breach of conditional release under 122C-205(a), (b) and (d) that the client has been discharged.
  4. If the client is returned to the 24-hour facility subsequent to discharge from the facility, applicable admission or commitment procedures shall be followed, when appropriate.

History. 1987, c. 674, s. 1.

§ 122C-206. Transfers of clients between 24-hour facilities; transfer of clients from 24-hour facilities to acute care hospitals.

  1. Before transferring a voluntary adult client from one 24-hour facility to another, the responsible professional at the original facility shall: (i) get authorization from the receiving facility that the facility will admit the client; (ii) get consent from the client; and (iii) if consent to share information is granted by the client, or if the disclosure of information is permitted under G.S. 122C-53(b), notify the next of kin of the time and location of the transfer. The preceding requirements of this paragraph may be waived if the client has been admitted under emergency procedures to a State facility not serving the client’s region of the State. Following an emergency admission, the client may be transferred to the appropriate State facility without consent according to the rules of the Commission.
  2. Before transferring a respondent held for a district court hearing or a committed respondent from one 24-hour facility to another, the responsible professional at the original facility shall:
    1. Obtain authorization from the receiving facility that the facility will admit the respondent; and
    2. Provide reasonable notice to the respondent or the legally responsible person, and to the respondent’s counsel, of the reason for the transfer and document the notice in the client’s record.No later than 24 hours after the transfer, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the petitioner, the clerk of court, the respondent’s counsel, and, if consent is granted by the respondent, or if the disclosure of the information is permitted under G.S. 122C-53 or other applicable law, the next of kin, that the transfer is complete. If the transfer is completed before the judicial commitment hearing, these proceedings shall be initiated by the receiving facility. If the respondent is a minor, an incompetent adult, or is deemed incapable, then the responsible professional at the original facility shall, not later than 24 hours after the transfer, notify the respondent’s legally responsible person of the location of the transfer and that the transfer is complete.
  3. Minors and incompetent adults, admitted pursuant to Parts 3 and 4 of this Article, may be transferred from one 24-hour facility to another following the same procedures specified in subsection (b) of this section. In addition, the legally responsible person shall be consulted before the proposed transfer and notified, within 24 hours after the transfer is complete, of the location of the transfer and that the transfer is complete. If the transfer is completed before the judicial determination required in G.S. 122C-223 or G.S. 122C-232 , these proceedings shall be initiated by the receiving facility. (c1) If a client described in subsections (b) or (c) of this section is to be transferred from one 24-hour facility to another, or to an acute care hospital pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, and transportation is needed, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the clerk of court or magistrate, and the clerk of court or magistrate shall issue a custody order for transportation of the client as provided by G.S. 122C-251 .
  4. Minors and incompetent adults, admitted pursuant to Part 5 of this Article and incapable adults admitted pursuant to Part 2A of this Article, may be transferred from one 24-hour facility to another provided that prior to transfer the responsible professional at the original facility shall:
    1. Obtain authorization from the receiving facility that the facility will admit the client; and
    2. Provide reasonable notice to the client regarding the reason for transfer and document the notice in the client’s record; and
    3. Provide reasonable notice to and consult with the legally responsible person regarding the reason for the transfer and document the notice and consultation in the client’s record.No later than 24 hours after the transfer, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the legally responsible person that the transfer is completed.
  5. The responsible professional may transfer a client from one 24-hour facility to another or to an acute care hospital for emergency medical treatment, emergency medical evaluation, or emergency surgery without notice to or consent from the client. Within a reasonable period of time the responsible professional shall notify the next of kin or the legally responsible person of the client of the transfer.
  6. When a client is transferred from one 24-hour facility to another solely for medical reasons, the client shall be returned to the original facility when the medical care is completed unless the responsible professionals at both facilities concur that discharge of the client who is not subject to G.S. 122C-266(b) is appropriate.

    (f1) When a client is transferred from a 24-hour facility to an acute care hospital solely for medical reasons, the hospital shall return the client to the original facility as soon as the next client space becomes available at the original facility after completion of the client’s medical care. With the exception of facility-based crisis centers, the original facility must allow at least 12 hours for the client’s return before assigning the client’s room or bed to another patient, unless both facilities agree that return of the client in this time period is not feasible. The original facility must accept the return of the client in priority over other clients seeking admission, except in the cases of patients designated incapable to proceed to trial by court order. If the responsible professionals at both facilities concur that discharge of a client who is not subject to G.S. 122C-266(b) is appropriate, the client may be discharged. If, at the time of the transfer, a client is being held under a custody order pending a second commitment examination or a district court hearing under involuntary commitment proceedings, the custody order shall remain valid throughout the period of time necessary to complete the client’s medical care and transport the client between the 24-hour facility and the acute care hospital; provided, however, that the requirement for a timely hearing under G.S. 122C-268(a) applies. Any decision to terminate the proceedings because the respondent no longer meets the criteria for commitment or because a hearing cannot be held within the time required by G.S. 122C-268(a) shall be documented and reported to the clerk of superior court in accordance with G.S. 122C-266(c).

  7. The Commission may adopt rules to implement this section.

History. 1919, c. 330; C.S., s. 6163; 1925, c. 51, s. 1; 1945, c. 925, s. 5; 1947, c. 537, s. 9; c. 623, s. 1; 1953, c. 675, s. 15; 1955, c. 1274, s. 1; 1959, c. 1002, s. 11; 1963, c. 1166, ss. 10, 12; 1973, c. 475, s. 1; c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, ss. 7, 8; c. 1436, ss. 6, 7; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; c. 328, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 15; 1991, c. 704, s. 1; 2018-33, s. 9.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 9, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 9, added “transfer of clients from 24-hour facilities to acute care hospitals” in the section catchline; in subsection (a), added “or if the disclosure of information is permitted under G.S. 122C-53 (b)” in the first sentence; in subdivision (b)(2), substituted “respondent or the legally responsible person, and to the respondent’s counsel” for “respondent, or legally responsible person,”; in the ending undesignated paragraph of subsection (b), in the first sentence, substituted “than 24 hours” for “that 24 hours,” inserted “the respondent’s counsel” and “or if the disclosure of the information is permitted under G.S. 122C-53 or other applicable law,” and substituted “complete” for “completed,” and added the last sentence; in subsection (c), added “and notified, within 24 hours after the transfer is complete, of the location of the transfer and that the transfer is complete” at the end of the second sentence; in subsection (c1), added “or to an acute care hospital pursuant to subsection (e) of this section”; in subsection (d), in the introductory paragraph, inserted “Article and incapable adults admitted pursuant to Part 2A of this”; in subsection (e), substituted “one 24-hour facility to another or to an acute care hospital” for “one facility to another”; in subsection (f), substituted “from one 24-hour facility to another” for “to another facility”; and added subsection (f1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-207. Confidentiality.

Court records made in all proceedings pursuant to this Article are confidential, and are not open to the general public except as provided for by G.S. 122C-54(d).

History. 1977, c. 696, s. 1; 1979, c. 164, s. 2; c. 915, s. 20; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Legal Periodicals.

For article on the result of the 1979 statutory changes in involuntary civil commitment in North Carolina, see 60 N.C.L. Rev. 985 (1982).

§ 122C-208. Voluntary admission not admissible in involuntary proceeding.

Except when considering treatment history as it pertains to an involuntary outpatient commitment, the fact that an individual has been voluntarily admitted for treatment shall not be competent evidence in an involuntary commitment proceeding.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Harmless Error. —

Evidence admitted in violation of former G.S. 122-56.6 was subject to the doctrine of harmless error. In re Salem, 31 N.C. App. 57, 228 S.E.2d 649, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 1902 (1976).

§ 122C-209. Voluntary admissions acceptance.

Nothing contained in Parts 2 through 5 of this Article requires a private physician or private facility to accept an individual as a client for examination or treatment. Examination or treatment at a private facility or by a private physician is at the expense of the individual to the extent that charges are not disposed of by contract between the area authority and private facility.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-210. Guardian to pay expenses out of estate.

It is the duty of the guardian who has legal custody of the estate of an incompetent individual held pursuant to the provisions of this Article in a facility to supply funds for his support in the facility during the stay as long as there are sufficient funds for that purpose over and beyond maintaining and supporting those individuals who may be legally dependent on the estate.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-210.1. Immunity from liability.

No facility, person, or entity, including an area facility, a facility licensed under this Chapter, an acute care hospital, a general hospital, an area authority, a law enforcement officer, an LME, or an LME/MCO, or any of their officials, staff, or employees, or any other physician or individual who is responsible for the custody, transportation, examination, admission, management, supervision, treatment, or release of a respondent or client and who is not grossly negligent, is civilly or criminally liable, personally or otherwise, for that person’s or entity’s actions or omissions arising from these responsibilities or for the actions or omissions of a respondent or client. This immunity is in addition to any other legal immunity from liability to which these persons, entities, facilities, agencies, or individuals may be entitled and applies to actions performed in connection with, or arising out of, the custody, transportation, examination, commitment, admission, management, supervision, treatment, or release of any individual pursuant to or under the authority of this Article or otherwise.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 31; Rev., s. 4560; C.S., s. 6172; 1961, c. 511, s. 1; 1973, c. 673, s. 10; 1983, c. 638, s. 15; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 3; 2018-33, s. 10.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 10, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 10, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

For article, “How Qualified Is Qualified Immunity: Adding A Third Prong To The Qualified Immunity Analysis,” see 43 Campbell L. Rev. 403 (2021).

CASE NOTES

Exercise of Professional Judgment. —

Adopting the standard enunciated in Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 102 S. Ct. 2452, 73 L. Ed. 2d 28 (1982), the court held that so long as the requisite procedures were followed, and the decision to restrain plaintiff, a voluntarily admitted patient at a State mental hospital, was an exercise of professional judgment, the defendants were not liable to the plaintiff for their actions. Alt v. Parker, 112 N.C. App. 307, 435 S.E.2d 773, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 1097 (1993).

Failure to Seek Involuntary Commitment of Patient. —

The statutory immunity given by this section makes it most unlikely that the North Carolina Supreme Court would hold that North Carolina’s public policy and its tort law would impose tort liabilities upon psychiatrists at Veterans Administration hospital for a mistake in not seeking involuntary commitment of a patient. Currie v. United States, 836 F.2d 209, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16735 (4th Cir. 1987).

Plaintiff Must Allege Gross or Intentional Negligence or Immunity Will Preclude Claim. —

Absent allegation of gross or intentional negligence, plaintiffs’ claims of negligence on part of health care providers at Veteran’s Administration facility were precluded by statutory immunity. Cantrell v. United States, 735 F. Supp. 670, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12849 (E.D.N.C. 1988).

Because there was a question of fact as to whether defendant rehabilitation center and its chief operating officer followed the applicable standard of care, they were not entitled to qualified immunity under G.S. 122C-210.1 on plaintiff’s wrongful death claims as a matter of law; plaintiff alleged facts that defendants had violated accepted professional judgment, practice and standards, an investigative report from the North Carolina Division of Facility Services found that the facility had failed to adequately supervise plaintiff’s brother, and plaintiff’s complaint was certified by an expert under N.C. R. Civ. P. 9(j) that the medical care outlined in the complaint did not comply with the applicable standard of care. Snyder v. Learning Servs. Corp., 187 N.C. App. 480, 653 S.E.2d 548, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 2454 (2007).

Liability for Wrongful Acts of Discharged Patient. —

The directors and superintendent of a hospital for the insane acting under former statutory provisions in discharging or releasing a patient therefrom could not be held responsible in damages for the subsequent killing by such patient of another under a charge of negligence. Bollinger v. Rader, 151 N.C. 381 , 151 N.C. 383 , 66 S.E. 314, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 280 (1909).

§ 122C-210.2. Research at State facilities for the mentally ill.

  1. For research purposes, State facilities for the mentally ill may be designated by the Secretary as facilities for the voluntary admission of adults who are not admissible as clients otherwise. Designation of these facilities shall be made in accordance with rules of the Secretary that assure the protection of those admitted for research purposes.
  2. Individuals may be admitted to such designated facilities on either an outpatient or inpatient basis.
  3. The Human Rights Committee of the designated facility shall monitor the care of individuals admitted for research during their participation in any research program.
  4. For these individuals admitted to such designated facilities for research purposes only, the following provisions shall apply:
    1. A written application for admission pursuant to G.S. 122C-211(a) and an examination by a physician within 24 hours of admission shall be provided to each of these individuals;
    2. They shall be exempt from the provisions of G.S. 122C-57(a) governing the rights to treatment and to a treatment plan; the requirements of G.S. 122C-61(2) and G.S. 122C-212(b); and the requirements of any single portal of entry and exit plan; however, nothing in this section shall take away the individual’s right to be informed of the potential risks and alleged benefits of their participation in any research program;
    3. The Secretary shall exempt these individuals from the provisions of Article 7 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes requiring payment for treatment in a State institution. The Secretary may also authorize reasonable compensation to be paid to individuals participating in research projects for their services; provided, that the compensation is paid from research grant funds; and
    4. The Commission shall adopt rules regarding the admission, care and discharge of those individuals admitted for research purposes only.

History. 1987, c. 358, s. 1.

§ 122C-210.3. Electronic and facsimile transmission of custody orders.

A custody order entered by the clerk or magistrate pursuant to this Chapter may be delivered to the law enforcement officer or other person designated or required to provide transportation and custody pursuant to G.S. 122C-251 by electronic or facsimile transmission.

History. 2015-176, s. 2.5(b); 2018-33, s. 11.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2015-176, s. 4, made this section effective August 5, 2015.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 11, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 11, added “or other person designated or required to provide transportation and custody pursuant to G.S. 122C-251 ” in the middle. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Part 2. Voluntary Admissions and Discharges, Competent Adults, Facilities for the Mentally Ill and Substance Abusers.

§ 122C-211. Admissions.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (b) through (f) of this section, any individual, including a parent in a family unit, in need of treatment for mental illness or substance abuse may seek voluntary admission at any facility by presenting himself or herself for evaluation to the facility. No physician’s statement is necessary, but a written application for evaluation or admission, signed by the individual seeking admission, or the individual’s legally responsible person, is required. The application form shall be available at all times at all facilities. However, no one shall be denied admission because application forms are not available. An evaluation shall determine whether the individual is in need of care, treatment, habilitation or rehabilitation for mental illness or substance abuse or further evaluation by the facility. Information provided by family members regarding the individual’s need for treatment shall be reviewed in the evaluation. If applicable, information provided in an advance instruction for mental health treatment by the client or the client’s legally responsible person shall be reviewed in the evaluation. An individual may not be accepted as a client if the facility determines that the individual does not need or cannot benefit from the care, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation available and that the individual is not in need of further evaluation by the facility. The facility shall give to an individual who is denied admission a referral to another facility or facilities that may be able to provide the treatment needed by the client.
  2. In 24-hour facilities the application shall acknowledge that the applicant may be held by the facility for a period of 72 hours after any written request for release that the applicant may make, and shall acknowledge that the 24-hour facility may have the legal right to petition for involuntary commitment of the applicant during that period. At the time of application, the facility shall tell the applicant about procedures for discharge.
  3. Any individual who voluntarily seeks admission to a 24-hour facility in which medical care is an integral component of the treatment shall be examined and evaluated by a physician of the facility within 24 hours of admission. The evaluation shall determine whether the individual is in need of treatment for mental illness or substance abuse or further evaluation by the facility. If the evaluating physician determines that the individual will not benefit from the treatment available, the individual shall not be accepted as a client.
  4. Any individual who voluntarily seeks admission to any 24-hour facility, other than one in which medical care is an integral component of the treatment, shall have a medical examination within 30 days before or after admission if it is reasonably expected that the individual will receive treatment for more than 30 days or shall produce a current, valid physical examination report, signed by a physician, completed within 12 months prior to the current admission. When applicable, this examination may be included in an examination conducted to meet the requirements of G.S. 122C-223 or G.S. 122C-232 .
  5. Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 12, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.
  6. A family unit may voluntarily seek admission to a 24-hour substance abuse facility that is able to provide, directly or by contract, treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation services that will specifically address the family unit’s needs. These services shall include gender-specific substance abuse treatment, habilitation, or rehabilitation for the parent as well as assessment, well-child care, and, as needed, early intervention services for the child. A family unit that voluntarily seeks admission to a 24-hour substance abuse facility shall be evaluated by the facility to determine whether the family unit would benefit from the services of the facility. A facility shall not accept a family unit as a client if the facility determines that the family unit does not need or cannot benefit from the care, habilitation, or rehabilitation available at the facility. The facility shall give to a family unit that is denied admission a referral to another facility or facilities that may be able to provide treatment needed by the family unit. Except as otherwise provided, this section applies to a parent in a family unit seeking admission under this section.

    (f1) Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 12, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

  7. As used in this Part, the term “family unit” means a parent and the parent’s dependent children under the age of three years.

History. 1945, c. 952, s. 471/2; 1963, c. 1184, s. 22; 1973, c. 723, s. 1; c. 1084; 1983, c. 383, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 16; 1989, c. 287; 1998-47, s. 1(a); 1998-198, s. 6; 1998-217, s. 53(a)(1), (2); 1999-456, s. 5; 2018-33, s. 12.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1998-47, s. 1, which amended this section, was effective retroactively to October 1, 1997.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 12, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 12, in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “through (f)” for “through (f1)” and added “or herself,” in the second sentence, added “or the individual’s legally responsible person,” and added the seventh sentence; and deleted subsections (e) and (f1). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Civil Commitment of Minors: Due and Undue Process,” see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1133 (1980).

For survey of 1979 criminal law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1350 (1980).

CASE NOTES

Standard of Care Due Prospective Clients. —

While voluntary written policies and procedures do not themselves establish a per se standard of due care appropriate to prospective clients, they represent some evidence of a reasonably prudent standard of care. Klassette ex rel. Klassette v. Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Auth., 88 N.C. App. 495, 364 S.E.2d 179, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 75 (1988).

Duty to Refer to Another Facility. —

This section imposes on a facility the duty to refer an individual to another facility for treatment; therefore, the facility must necessarily use due care in exercising its judgment not to refer an individual for further treatment. Klassette ex rel. Klassette v. Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Auth., 88 N.C. App. 495, 364 S.E.2d 179, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 75 (1988).

Shift supervisor of treatment center was required to use due care in deciding whether or not to refer plaintiff for further aid when his friend brought him to the center unconscious and notified the shift supervisor of his drug overdose. Klassette ex rel. Klassette v. Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Auth., 88 N.C. App. 495, 364 S.E.2d 179, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 75 (1988).

Control Not Conferred by Voluntary Commitment. —

Voluntary commitment to treatment facility by veteran for severe post traumatic stress disorder would not have conferred control over him. Cantrell v. United States, 735 F. Supp. 670, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12849 (E.D.N.C. 1988).

No Requirement That Minor Voluntarily Committed Receive Medical Examination Within Twenty-Four Hours Of Admission. —

Because there was insufficient record evidence that medical care was an integral component of treatment at a psychiatric treatment facility, there was no statutory requirement that a minor who was voluntarily admitted to the facility receive a medical examination within twenty-four hours of admission; the minor made no argument that the requirements of subsection (d) had been violated. In re A.N.B., 232 N.C. App. 407, 754 S.E.2d 442 (2014).

Insufficient Evidence Medical Care Was Integral Component Of Treatment At Psychiatric Treatment Facility. —

Subsection (c) did not apply because there was not sufficient record evidence that a psychiatric treatment facility was a facility in which medical care was an integral component of the treatment; the use of prescription medications at the facility was not a sufficient to define it as such a facility. In re A.N.B., 232 N.C. App. 407, 754 S.E.2d 442 (2014).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Voluntarily Admitted Patient May Be Involuntarily Returned After Escape. See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. R.J. Bickel, Division of Mental Health Services, Department of Human Resources, 44 N.C.A.G. 52 (1974), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-212. Discharges.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, an individual who has been voluntarily admitted to a facility shall be discharged upon the individual’s own request. A request for discharge from a 24-hour facility shall be in writing.
  2. An individual who has been voluntarily admitted to a 24-hour facility may be held for 72 hours after the individual’s written application for discharge is submitted.

History. 1973, c. 723, s. 1; c. 1084; 1983, c. 383, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 13.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 13, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 13, in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “subsection (b)” for “subsections (b) and (c)” and “the individual’s own” for “his own”; in subsection (b), substituted “the individual’s written” for “his written”; and deleted former subsection (c), which read: “When an individual from a single portal area who has been voluntarily admitted to an area or State 24-hour facility is discharged, the discharge shall follow the procedures as prescribed in the area plan.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “The Duty to Control in Negligent Release Cases: King v. Durham County Mental Health Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Authority,” see 21 N.C. Cent. L.J. 379 (1995).

CASE NOTES

Control Not Conferred by Voluntary Commitment. —

Voluntary commitment to treatment facility by veteran for severe post traumatic stress disorder would not have conferred control over him. Cantrell v. United States, 735 F. Supp. 670, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12849 (E.D.N.C. 1988).

§§ 122C-213 through 122C-215.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2A. Voluntary Admissions and Discharges; Incapable Adults; Facilities for Individuals With Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder.

§ 122C-216. Voluntary admission of individuals determined to be incapable.

  1. An individual in need of treatment for mental illness and who is incapable, as defined in G.S. 122C-3 and G.S. 122C-72 , may be admitted to and treated in a facility pursuant to an advance instruction for mental health treatment executed in accordance with Part 2 of Article 3 of this Chapter or pursuant to the authority of a health care agent named in a valid health care power of attorney executed in accordance with Article 3 of Chapter 32A of the General Statutes.
  2. Except as otherwise provided in this Part, G.S. 122C-211 applies to admissions of incapable adults under this Part.
  3. An advance instruction for mental health treatment shall be governed by Part 2 of Article 3 of this Chapter.
  4. When a health care power of attorney authorizes a health care agent pursuant to G.S. 32A-19 to make mental health treatment decisions for an incapable individual, the health care agent shall act for the individual in applying for admission and consenting to treatment at a facility, consistent with the extent and limitations of authority granted in the health care power of attorney for as long as the individual remains incapable.
  5. A 24-hour facility may not hold an individual under a voluntary admission who is determined to be incapable at the time of admission and who is admitted pursuant to an advance instruction for mental health treatment for more than 15 days, except as provided in G.S. 122C-211 (b); provided, however, that an individual who regains sufficient understanding and capacity to make and communicate mental health treatment decisions may elect to continue his or her admission and treatment pursuant to the individual’s informed consent in accordance with G.S. 122C-211 . A 24-hour facility may file a petition for involuntary commitment pursuant to Article 5 of this Chapter if an individual meets applicable criteria at the conclusion of this 15-day period.
  6. For purposes of this section, if an incapable adult in need of treatment has no health care power of attorney or advance instruction for mental health treatment that addresses the needed treatment, and the incapable adult has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes, the legally responsible person for the incapable adult shall be one of the persons listed in subdivisions (3) through (7) of subsection (c) of G.S. 90-21.13 , to be selected based on the priority order indicated in said subdivisions (3) through (7); provided that the persons listed in subdivisions (4) through (7) of subsection (c) of G.S. 90-21.13 shall not have the authority to admit an incapable adult to a 24-hour facility where the adult will be subject to the same or similar restrictions on freedom of movement present in the State facilities for the mentally ill.

History. 2018-33, s. 14; 2019-240, s. 26(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made this part effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-33, s. 14, enacted this section as G.S. 122C-213 . It was redesignated as G.S. 122C-216 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(e), effective November 6, 2019, added subsection (f).

§ 122C-217. Discharge of individuals determined to be incapable.

  1. The responsible professional shall unconditionally discharge an individual admitted to a facility pursuant to this Part at any time it is determined the individual is no longer mentally ill or in need of treatment at the facility.
  2. An individual who has been voluntarily admitted to a facility pursuant to this Part and who is no longer deemed incapable shall be discharged upon his or her own request. An individual’s request for discharge from a 24-hour facility shall be in writing. A facility may hold an individual who has been voluntarily admitted to a 24-hour facility pursuant to this Part for up to 72 hours after the individual submits a written request for discharge, but the facility shall release the individual upon the expiration of 72 hours following submission of the written request for discharge unless the responsible professional obtains an order under Part 7 or 8 of this Article to hold the client.
  3. A health care agent named in a valid health care power of attorney or the legally responsible person may submit on behalf of an individual admitted to a facility under this Part a written request to have the individual discharged from the facility, provided (i) the individual remains incapable at the time of the request and (ii) the request is not inconsistent with the authority expressed in the health care power of attorney or other controlling document. A facility may hold an individual for up to 72 hours after a health care agent submits a written request for the individual’s discharge but shall release the individual upon the expiration of 72 hours following submission of the written request for discharge unless the responsible professional obtains an order under Part 7 or 8 of this Article to hold the client.
  4. If, in the opinion of a physician or eligible psychologist, an individual admitted to a facility under this Part regains sufficient understanding and capacity to make and communicate mental health treatment decisions while in treatment, and the individual refuses to sign an authorization for continued treatment within 72 hours after regaining decisional capacity, the facility shall discharge the individual unless the responsible professional obtains an order under Part 7 or 8 of this Article to hold the client.
  5. In any case in which an order is issued authorizing the involuntary commitment of an individual admitted to a facility under this Part, the facility’s further treatment and holding of the individual shall be in accordance with Part 7 or 8 of this Article, whichever is applicable.

History. 2018-33, s. 14.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 14, enacted this section as G.S. 122C-214. It was redesignated as G.S. 122C-217 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

§§ 122C-218 through 122C-220.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 3. Voluntary Admissions and Discharges, Minors, Facilities for the Mentally Ill and Substance Abusers.

§ 122C-221. Admissions.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in this Part, a minor may be admitted to a facility if the minor is mentally ill or a substance abuser and in need of treatment. Except as otherwise provided in this Part, the provisions of G.S. 122C-211 shall apply to admissions of minors under this Part. Except as provided in G.S. 90-21.5 , in applying for admission to a facility, in consenting to medical treatment when consent is required, and in any other legal procedure under this Article, the legally responsible person shall act for the minor. The application of the minor shall be in writing and signed by the legally responsible person. If a minor reaches the age of 18 while in treatment under this Part, further treatment is authorized only on the written authorization of the client or under the provisions of Part 7 or Part 8 of Article 5 of this Chapter.
  2. The Commission shall adopt rules governing procedures for admission to 24-hour facilities not falling within the category of facilities where freedom of movement is restricted. These rules shall be designed to ensure that no minor is improperly admitted to or improperly remains in a 24-hour facility.

History. 1973, c. 1084; 1983, c. 302, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 370, s. 1; 2018-33, s. 15.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 370 rewrote this Part. Where appropriate, the historical citations to the sections in the Part as originally enacted have been added to corresponding sections in the rewritten Part.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 15, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 15, added the next to last sentence in subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Minor is entitled to protection of due process procedures. In re Long, 25 N.C. App. 702, 214 S.E.2d 626, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2381 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 913 (1975) (decided under former statutory procedures).

The admission procedure under former Chapter 122 was permissible. The judicial deference afforded to parental authority, along with the parent’s interest in being able to seek immediate treatment and the policy of encouraging voluntary admissions, would outweigh any interest the minor might have in a pre-admission hearing. However, the continued confinement of a minor based on that procedure would require procedural safeguards consistent with the due process clause. Such procedural due process should be afforded at the earliest possible time after admission. In re Long, 25 N.C. App. 702, 214 S.E.2d 626, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2381 , cert. denied, 288 N.C. 241 , 217 S.E.2d 665, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 913 (1975).

§ 122C-222. Admissions to State facilities.

Admission of a minor who is a resident of a county that is not in a single portal area shall be made to a State facility following screening and upon referral by an area authority, a physician, or an eligible psychologist. Further planning of treatment and discharge for the minor is the joint responsibility of the State facility and the person making the referral.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 370 rewrote this section, which formerly related to emergency admission to a 24-hour facility. As to emergency admission to a 24-hour facility, see now G.S. 122C-223 .

§ 122C-223. Emergency admission to a 24-hour facility.

  1. In an emergency situation, when the legally responsible person does not appear with the minor to apply for admission, a minor who is mentally ill or a substance abuser and in need of treatment may be admitted to a 24-hour facility upon his own written application. The application shall serve as the initiating document for the hearing required by G.S. 122C-224 .
  2. Within 24 hours of admission, the facility shall notify the legally responsible person of the admission unless notification is impossible due to an inability to identify, to locate, or to contact him after all reasonable means to establish contact have been attempted.
  3. If the legally responsible person cannot be located within 72 hours of admission, the responsible professional shall initiate proceedings for juvenile protective services as described in Article 3 of Chapter 7B of the General Statutes in either the minor’s county of residence or in the county in which the facility is located.
  4. Within 24 hours of an emergency admission to a State facility, the State facility shall notify the area authority and, as appropriate, the minor’s physician or eligible psychologist. Further planning of treatment and discharge for the minor is the joint responsibility of the State facility and the appropriate person in the community.

History. 1973, c. 1084; 1983, c. 302, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 370, s. 1; 1998-202, s. 13(ff).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 370 rewrote this section, which formerly related to judicial determinations. As to judicial review of voluntary admissions, see now G.S. 122C-224 . Former G.S. 122C-222 related to emergency admission to a 24-hour facility.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Civil Commitment of Minors: Due and Undue Process,” see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1133 (1980).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

The post-admission procedures specified by former G.S. 122-56.7 did not violate the right to privacy of a voluntarily admitted minor or incompetent person. Opinion of Attorney General to Mr. John L. Pinnix, 20 August 1975.

Following Admission of Minor Child to Treatment Facility Only Court or Facility May Release Minor. Pursuant to the provisions of former G.S. 122-56.7, parents who applied for admission of their minor child to a treatment facility could not later obtain a discharge of the child prior to judicial determination of the need for further treatment at the treatment facility. Only the court or the treatment facility could release the minor child and only then upon determination that the child did not need further hospitalization. See opinion of Attorney General to Mary B. Chamblee, Assistant Public Defender, 26th Judicial District, 49 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 166 (1980).

§ 122C-224. Judicial review of voluntary admission.

  1. When a minor is admitted to a 24-hour facility where the minor will be subjected to the same restrictions on his freedom of movement present in the State facilities for the mentally ill, or to similar restrictions, a hearing shall be held by the district court in the county in which the 24-hour facility is located within 15 days of the day that the minor is admitted to the facility. A continuance of not more than five days may be granted.
  2. Before the admission, the facility shall provide the minor and his legally responsible person with written information describing the procedures for court review of the admission and informing them about the discharge procedures. They shall also be informed that, after a written request for discharge, the facility may hold the minor for 72 hours during which time the facility may apply for a petition for involuntary commitment.
  3. Within 24 hours after admission, the facility shall notify the clerk of court in the county where the facility is located that the minor has been admitted and that a hearing for concurrence in the admission must be scheduled. At the time notice is given to schedule a hearing, the facility shall (i) notify the clerk of the names and addresses of the legally responsible person and the responsible professional and (ii) provide the clerk with a copy of the legally responsible person’s written application for admission of the minor and the facility’s written evaluation of the minor, both of which are required under G.S. 122C-211(a).

History. 1975, c. 839; 1977, c. 756; 1979, c. 171, s. 1; 1983, c. 889, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 370, s. 1; 2018-33, s. 16.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 370 rewrote this section, which formerly related to discharges. As to discharges, see now G.S. 122C-224.7 . Former G.S. 122C-223 related to judicial determinations.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (c) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 16, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 16, in subsection (c), added the item (i) designator, added item (ii), and made a minor punctuation and grammatical change. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-224.1. Duties of clerk of court.

  1. Within 48 hours of receipt of notice that a minor has been admitted to a 24-hour facility wherein his freedom of movement will be restricted, an attorney shall be appointed for the minor in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. When a minor has been admitted to a State facility for the mentally ill, the attorney appointed shall be the attorney employed in accordance with G.S. 122C-270(a) through (c). All minors shall be conclusively presumed to be indigent, and it shall not be necessary for the court to receive from any minor an affidavit of indigency. The attorney shall be paid a reasonable fee in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. The judge may require payment of the attorney’s fee from a person other than the minor as provided in G.S. 7A-450.1 through G.S. 7A-450.4 .
  2. Upon receipt of notice that a minor has been admitted to a 24-hour facility wherein his freedom of movement will be restricted, the clerk shall calendar a hearing to be held within 15 days of admission for the purpose of review of the minor’s admission. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given as provided in G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4(j) to the attorney in lieu of the minor, as soon as possible but not later than 72 hours before the scheduled hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be sent to the legally responsible person and the responsible professional as soon as possible but not later than 72 hours before the hearing by first-class mail postage prepaid to the individual’s last known address.
  3. The clerk shall schedule all hearings and rehearings and send all notices as required by this Part.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1; 2000-144, s. 37.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Although a minor cannot obtain legal representation without the consent of the legally responsible person, the rights of the child can be adequately protected. First, the Department of Social Services can conduct an investigation of the legally responsible person pursuant to G.S. 7A-542 et seq. [see now G.S. 7B-300 et seq.], the guardian ad litem program can provide additional support for abused, neglected, or dependent juveniles, including legal support and, a minor receives representation for the commitment proceedings by virtue of this section and G.S. 122C-270 . See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

§ 122C-224.2. Duties of the attorney for the minor.

  1. The attorney shall meet with the minor within 10 days of his appointment but not later than 48 hours before the hearing. In addition, the attorney shall inform the minor of the scheduled hearing and shall give the minor a copy of the notice of the time and place of the hearing no later than 48 hours before the hearing.
  2. The attorney shall counsel the minor concerning the hearing procedure and the potential effects of the hearing proceeding on the minor. If the minor does not wish to appear, the attorney shall file a motion with the court before the scheduled hearing to waive the minor’s right to be present at the hearing procedure except during the minor’s own testimony. If the attorney determines that the minor does not wish to appear before the judge to provide his own testimony, the attorney shall file a separate motion with the court before the hearing to waive the minor’s right to testify.
  3. In all actions on behalf of the minor, the attorney shall represent the minor until formally relieved of the responsibility by the judge.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

§ 122C-224.3. Hearing for review of admission.

  1. Hearings shall be held at the 24-hour facility in which the minor is being treated, if it is located within the judge’s district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 , unless the judge determines that the court calendar will be disrupted by such scheduling. In cases where the hearing cannot be held in the 24-hour facility, the judge may schedule the hearing in another location, including the judge’s chambers. The hearing may not be held in a regular courtroom, over objection of the minor’s attorney, if in the discretion of the judge a more suitable place is available.
  2. The minor shall have the right to be present at the hearing unless the judge rules favorably on the motion of the attorney to waive the minor’s appearance. However, the minor shall retain the right to appear before the judge to provide his own testimony and to respond to the judge’s questions unless the judge makes a separate finding that the minor does not wish to appear upon motion of the attorney.
  3. Certified copies of reports and findings of physicians, psychologists and other responsible professionals as well as previous and current medical records are admissible in evidence, but the minor’s right, through his attorney, to confront and cross-examine witnesses may not be denied.
  4. Hearings shall be closed to the public unless the attorney requests otherwise.
  5. A copy of all documents admitted into evidence and a transcript of the proceedings shall be furnished to the attorney, on request, by the clerk upon the direction of a district court judge. The copies shall be provided at State expense.
  6. For an admission to be authorized beyond the hearing, the minor must be (1) mentally ill or a substance abuser and (2) in need of further treatment at the 24-hour facility to which he has been admitted. Further treatment at the admitting facility should be undertaken only when lesser measures will be insufficient. It is not necessary that the judge make a finding of dangerousness in order to support a concurrence in the admission.
  7. The court shall make one of the following dispositions:
    1. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the requirements of subsection (f) have been met, the court shall concur with the voluntary admission and set the length of the authorized admission of the minor for a period not to exceed 90 days; or
    2. If the court determines that there exist reasonable grounds to believe that the requirements of subsection (f) have been met but that additional diagnosis and evaluation is needed before the court can concur in the admission, the court may make a one time authorization of up to an additional 15 days of stay, during which time further diagnosis and evaluation shall be conducted; or
    3. If the court determines that the conditions for concurrence or continued diagnosis and evaluation have not been met, the judge shall order that the minor be released.
  8. The decision of the District Court in all hearings and rehearings is final. Appeal may be had to the Court of Appeals by the State or by any party on the record as in civil cases. The minor may be retained and treated in accordance with this Part, pending the outcome of the appeal, unless otherwise ordered by the District Court or the Court of Appeals.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 113.

CASE NOTES

Confrontation Rights. —

Trial court erred in relying solely on a staff member’s evaluation in committing a juvenile to a treatment facility because, while the plain language of the statute at issue permitted admission of relevant medical records (such as the staff member’s report) into evidence, it also ensured the juvenile’s right to confront and cross-examine her, and the staff member’s unavailability to testify at the hearing denied the juvenile’s right to cross-examine her. In re C.W.F., 232 N.C. App. 213, 753 S.E.2d 736, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 119 (2014).

Appellate Review. —

Because orders of voluntary admission of a minor to a twenty-four hour psychiatric treatment facility can only be for a maximum length of ninety days, appeal from orders of voluntary admission of a minor to a twenty-four hour facility falls into the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to the mootness doctrine. In re A.N.B., 232 N.C. App. 407, 754 S.E.2d 442 (2014).

Because of the State’s great interest in preventing unwarranted admission of juveniles into twenty-four hour psychiatric treatment facilities, appeal from orders of voluntary admission of a minor to such a facility falls into the public policy exception of the mootness doctrine. In re A.N.B., 232 N.C. App. 407, 754 S.E.2d 442 (2014).

Failure To Find Minor In Need Of Further Treatment. —

Trial court erred in continuing a minor’s admission at a psychiatric treatment facility because it failed to make a specific finding that the minor was in need of further treatment at the facility; though need for further treatment is a reasonable inference of the findings and conclusions made, the required ultimate findings of fact must be made explicitly. In re A.N.B., 232 N.C. App. 407, 754 S.E.2d 442 (2014).

Not Error to Order Readmission Despite Recommendation of Less Restrictive Treatment. —

Readmitting a juvenile to a psychiatric residential treatment facility despite a recommendation that the juvenile be discharged to less restrictive treatment did not err because no sufficient lesser facility was available, so (1) literally interpreting G.S. 122C-2 24.3(f), barring such readmission if less restrictive treatment were appropriate, was absurd, and (2) G.S. 122C-2 intended use of available resources. In re M.B., 240 N.C. App. 140, 771 S.E.2d 615, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 262 (2015).

§ 122C-224.4. Rehearings.

  1. A minor admitted to a 24-hour facility upon order of the court for further diagnosis and evaluation shall have the right to a rehearing if the responsible professional determines that the minor is in need of further treatment beyond the time authorized by the court for diagnosis and evaluation.
  2. A minor admitted to a 24-hour facility upon the concurrence of the court shall have the right to a rehearing for further concurrence in continued treatment before the end of the period authorized by the court. The court shall review the continued admission in accordance with the hearing procedures in this Part. The court may order discharge of the minor if the minor no longer meets the criteria for admission. If the minor continues to meet the criteria for admission the court shall concur with the continued admission of the minor and set the length of the authorized admission for a period not to exceed 180 days. Subsequent rehearings shall be scheduled at the end of each subsequent authorized treatment period, but no longer than every 180 days.
  3. The responsible professional shall notify the clerk, no later than 15 days before the end of the authorized admission, that continued stay beyond the authorized admission is recommended for the minor. The clerk shall calendar the rehearing to be held before the end of the current authorized admission.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

§ 122C-224.5. Transportation.

When it is necessary for a minor to be transported to a location other than the treating facility for the purpose of a hearing, transportation shall be provided under the provisions of G.S. 122C-251 . However, the 24-hour facility may obtain permission from the court to routinely provide transportation of minors to and from hearings.

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

§ 122C-224.6. Treatment pending hearing and after authorization for or concurrence in admission.

  1. Pending the initial hearing and after authorization for further diagnosis and evaluation, or concurrence in admission, the responsible professional may administer to the minor reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment that is consistent with accepted medical standards and consistent with Article 3 of this Chapter.
  2. The responsible professional may release the minor conditionally for periods not in excess of 30 days on specified appropriate conditions. Violation of the conditions is grounds for return of the minor to the 24-hour facility. A law enforcement officer, on request of the responsible professional, shall take the minor into custody and return him to the facility in accordance with G.S. 122C-205 .

History. 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

§ 122C-224.7. Discharge.

  1. The responsible professional shall unconditionally discharge a minor from treatment at any time that it is determined that the minor is no longer mentally ill or a substance abuser, or no longer in need of treatment at the facility.
  2. The legally responsible person may file a written request for discharge from the facility at any time. The facility may hold the minor in the facility for 72 hours after receipt of the request for discharge. If the responsible professional believes that the minor is mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others, he may file a petition for involuntary commitment under the provisions of Part 7 of this Article. If the responsible professional believes that the minor is a substance abuser and dangerous to himself or others, he may file a petition for involuntary commitment under the provisions of Part 8 of this Article. If an order authorizing the holding of the minor under involuntary commitment procedures is issued, further treatment and holding shall follow the provisions of Part 7 or Part 8 whichever is applicable. If an order authorizing the holding of the minor under involuntary commitment procedures is not issued, the minor shall be discharged.
  3. If a client reaches age 18 while in treatment, and the client refuses to sign an authorization for continued treatment within 72 hours of reaching 18, he shall be discharged unless the responsible professional obtains an order to hold the client under the provisions of Part 7 or Part 8 of this Article pursuant to an involuntary commitment.

History. 1975, c. 839; 1977, c. 756; 1979, c. 171, s. 1; 1983, c. 889, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 370, s. 1.

§§ 122C-225 through 122C-229.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 4. Voluntary Admissions and Discharges, Incompetent Adults, Facilities for the Mentally Ill and Substance Abusers.

§ 122C-230. Applicability of Part 4.

This Part applies to adults who are adjudicated incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction. This Part does not apply to the admission of adults who are deemed incapable but who have not been adjudicated incompetent.

History. 2018-33, s. 17.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made this section effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

§ 122C-231. Admissions.

Except as otherwise provided in this Part an incompetent adult may be admitted to a facility when the individual is mentally ill or a substance abuser and in need of treatment. The provisions of G.S. 122C-211 shall apply to admissions of an incompetent adult under this Part except that the legally responsible person shall act for the individual, in applying for admission to a facility, in consenting to medical treatment when consent is required, in giving or receiving any legal notice, and in any other legal procedure under this Article.

History. 1973, c. 1084; 1983, c. 302, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Subject Matter Jurisdiction.—

Trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to enter a voluntary admission order concurring in the admission of a patient to a psychiatric facility and authorizing that the patient remain admitted for additional inpatient treatment, when the patient was an adult incompetent, because the court never received a written and signed application by the patient’s guardian for the patient’s voluntary admission to the facility to initiate the post-admission review hearing from which the court’s order arose. In re Wolfe, 254 N.C. App. 416, 803 S.E.2d 649, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 555 (2017).

§ 122C-232. Judicial determination.

  1. When an incompetent adult is admitted to a 24-hour facility where the incompetent adult will be subjected to the same restrictions on freedom of movement present in the State facilities for the mentally ill, or to similar restrictions, a hearing shall be held in the district court in the county in which the 24-hour facility is located within 10 days after the day the incompetent adult is admitted to the facility. A continuance of not more than five days may be granted upon motion [of] any of the following:
    1. The court.
    2. Respondent’s counsel.
    3. The responsible professional.

      The Commission shall adopt rules governing procedures for admission to other 24-hour facilities not falling within the category of facilities where freedom of movement is restricted; these rules shall be designed to ensure that no incompetent adult is improperly admitted to or remains in a facility.

      (a1) Prior to admission, the facility shall provide the incompetent adult and the legally responsible person with written information describing the procedures for court review of the admission and the procedures for discharge.

      (a2) Within 24 hours after admission, the facility shall notify the clerk of court of the county in which the facility is located that the incompetent adult has been admitted and that a hearing for concurrence in the admission must be scheduled. At the time the facility provides notice to the court to schedule a hearing for concurrence, the facility shall notify the clerk of the names and addresses of the legally responsible person and the responsible professional and provide a copy of the legally responsible person’s written application for evaluation or admission of the incompetent adult and the facility’s evaluation of the incompetent adult.

  2. In any case requiring the hearing described in subsection (a) of this section, no petition is necessary; the written application for voluntary admission shall serve as the initiating document for the hearing. The court shall determine whether the incompetent adult is mentally ill or a substance abuser and is in need of further treatment at the facility. Further treatment at the facility should be undertaken only when lesser measures will be insufficient. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that these requirements have been met, the court shall concur with the voluntary admission of the incompetent adult and set the length of the authorized admission for a period not to exceed 90 days. If the court finds that these requirements have not been met, it shall order that the incompetent adult be released. A finding of dangerousness to self or others is not necessary to support the determination that further treatment should be undertaken.
  3. Unless otherwise provided in this Part, the hearing specified in subsection (a) of this section, including the provisions for representation of indigent incompetent adults, all subsequent proceedings, and conditional release are governed by the involuntary commitment procedures of Part 7 of this Article.
  4. In addition to the notice of hearings and rehearings to the incompetent adult and his or her counsel required under Part 7 of this Article, notice shall be given by the clerk to the legally responsible person or a successor to the legally responsible person. The legally responsible person or a successor to the legally responsible person may also file with the clerk of court a written waiver of the right to receive notice.

History. 1975, c. 839; 1977, c. 756; 1979, c. 171, s. 1; 1983, c. 889, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 18.

Editor’s Note.

The bracketed “of” in subsection (a) was inserted at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 18, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 18, in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “on freedom” for “on his freedom” and substituted “days after the day the” for “days of the day that the” and in the second sentence, substituted “motion any of the following” for “motion of”, and made minor punctuation and grammatical changes in the subdivisions; added subsections (a1) and (a2); in subsection (b), added “and set the length of the authorized admission for a period not to exceed 90 days” at the end of the fourth sentence; and, in subsection (d), in the first sentence, substituted “his or her counsel required under Part 7 of this Article, notice shall be given by the clerk to the legally responsible person or a successor to the legally responsible person” for “his counsel required under Part 7 of this Article, notice shall be given by the clerk to the legally responsible person, or his successor” and in the second sentence, substituted “person or a successor to the legally responsible person may” for “person, or his successor may” and substituted “the right” for “his right.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Before a court can concur with a voluntary commitment for an incompetent, it must find that the incompetent is mentally ill or an inebriate and is in need of further treatment at the treatment facility. In re Hiatt, 45 N.C. App. 318, 262 S.E.2d 685, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2634 (1980) (decided under former statutory provisions).

Subject Matter Jurisdiction. —

Trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to enter a voluntary admission order concurring in the admission of a patient to a psychiatric facility and authorizing that the patient remain admitted for additional inpatient treatment, when the patient was an adult incompetent, because the court never received a written and signed application by the patient’s guardian for the patient’s voluntary admission to the facility to initiate the post-admission review hearing from which the court’s order arose. In re Wolfe, 254 N.C. App. 416, 803 S.E.2d 649, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 555 (2017).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

The post-admission procedures specified by former G.S. 122-56.7 did not violate the right to privacy of a voluntarily admitted minor or incompetent person. Opinion of Attorney General to Mr. John L. Pinnix, 20 August 1975.

§ 122C-233. Discharges.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, an incompetent adult shall be discharged upon the request of the legally responsible person as provided in G.S. 122C-212 .
  2. After the court has concurred in the admission of an incompetent adult to a 24-hour facility as provided in G.S. 122C-232 , only the facility or the court may release the incompetent adult at any time when either determines that the incompetent adult does not need further treatment at the facility. If the legally responsible person believes that release is in the best interest of the incompetent adult, and the facility refuses release, the legally responsible person may apply to the court for a hearing for discharge.

History. 1975, c. 839; 1977, c. 756; 1979, c. 171, s. 1; 1983, c. 889, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-234 through 122C-240.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 5. Voluntary Admissions and Discharges, Minors and Adults, Facilities for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities.

§ 122C-241. Admissions.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, an individual with intellectual or other developmental disabilities may be admitted to a facility for individuals with intellectual or other developmental disabilities to receive care, habilitation, rehabilitation, training, or treatment. Application for admission is made as follows:
    1. A minor with intellectual or other developmental disabilities may be admitted upon application by both the father and the mother if they are living together and, if not, by the parent or parents having custody or by the legally responsible person.
    2. An adult with intellectual or other developmental disabilities who has been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes may be admitted upon application by the adult’s guardian.
    3. An adult with intellectual or other developmental disabilities who has not been adjudicated incompetent under Chapter 35A or former Chapters 33 or 35 of the General Statutes may be admitted upon the adult’s own application.
  2. Prior to admission to a 24-hour facility, the individual shall be examined and evaluated by a physician or psychologist to determine whether the individual has a developmental disability. In addition, the individual shall be examined and evaluated by a qualified developmental disabilities professional no sooner than 31 days prior to admission or within 72 hours after admission to determine whether the individual is in need of care, habilitation, rehabilitation, training, or treatment by the facility. If the evaluating professional determines that the individual will not benefit from an admission, the individual shall not be admitted as a client.
  3. An admission to an area or State 24-hour facility of an individual from a single portal area shall follow the procedures as prescribed in the area plan. When an individual from a single portal area presents himself or herself or is presented for admission directly to a State developmental center and is in need of an emergency admission, he or she may be accepted for admission. The State developmental center shall notify the area authority within 24 hours of the admission and further planning of treatment for the individual is the joint responsibility of the area authority and the State developmental center as prescribed in the area plan.

History. 1963, c. 1184, s. 6; 1965, c. 800, s. 12; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1983, c. 383, s. 7; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 14; 1989, c. 625, s. 22; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 26(d); 2019-76, s. 6.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 6 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 6, rewrote this section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-242. Discharges.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (b) through (d) of this section, discharges from facilities for individuals with developmental disabilities are made upon request of the individual authorized in G.S. 122C-241(a) to make application for admission or by the director of the facility.
  2. Any adult who has not been declared incompetent and who is admitted to a 24-hour facility shall be discharged upon his own request, unless the director of the facility has reason to believe that the adult is endangering himself by the discharge. In this case the individual may be held for a period not to exceed five days while the director petitions for the adjudication of incompetency of the individual and the appointment of an interim guardian under Chapter 35A of the General Statutes.
  3. Any individual admitted to a 24-hour facility may be discharged when in the judgment of the director of the facility the individual is no longer in need of care, treatment, habilitation or rehabilitation by the facility or the individual will no longer benefit from the service available. In the case of an area or State facility rules adopted by the Commission or by the Secretary in accordance with G.S. 122C-63 shall be followed.
  4. When the individual to be discharged from an area or State 24-hour facility is a resident of a single portal area, the discharge shall follow the procedures described in the area plan.

History. 1963, c. 1184, s. 6; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1983, c. 383, s. 8; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 625, s. 22; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1024, s. 26(c).

§§ 122C-243 through 122C-250.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 6. Involuntary Commitment — General Provisions.

§ 122C-251. Custody and transportation.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (c), (f), and (g) [of this section], transportation of a respondent within a county under the involuntary commitment proceedings of this Article, including admission and discharge, shall be provided by the city or county. The city has the duty to provide transportation of a respondent who is a resident of the city or who is physically taken into custody in the city limits. The county has the duty to provide transportation for a respondent who resides in the county outside city limits or who is physically taken into custody outside of city limits. However, cities and counties may contract with each other to provide transportation.
  2. Except as provided in subsections (c), (f), and (g) [of this section] or in G.S. 122C-408(b) , transportation between counties under the involuntary commitment proceedings of this Article for a first examination as described in G.S. 122C-263(a) and G.S. 122C-283(a) and for admission to a 24-hour facility shall be provided by the county where the respondent is taken into custody. Transportation between counties under the involuntary commitment proceedings of this Article for respondents held in 24-hour facilities who have requested a change of venue for the district court hearing shall be provided by the county where the petition for involuntary commitment was initiated. Transportation between counties under the involuntary commitment proceedings of this Article for discharge of a respondent from a 24-hour facility shall be provided by the county of residence of the respondent. However, a respondent being discharged from a facility may use his own transportation at his own expense.
  3. Transportation of a respondent may be (i) by city- or county-owned vehicles, (ii) by private vehicle by contract with the city or county, or (iii) as provided in an agreement developed and adopted under subsection (g) of this section and G.S. 122C-202.2 . To the extent feasible, law enforcement officers transporting respondents shall dress in plain clothes and shall travel in unmarked vehicles. Further, law enforcement officers, to the extent possible, shall advise respondents when taking them into custody that they are not under arrest and have not committed a crime, but are being taken into custody and transported to receive treatment and for their own safety and that of others.
  4. To the extent feasible, in providing transportation of a respondent, a city or county shall provide a driver or attendant who is the same sex as the respondent, unless the law enforcement officer allows a family member of the respondent to accompany the respondent in lieu of an attendant of the same sex as the respondent.
  5. In taking custody and providing transportation as required by this section, the law enforcement officer may use reasonable force to restrain the respondent if it appears necessary to protect the law enforcement officer, the respondent, or others. Any use of restraints shall be as reasonably determined by the officer to be necessary under the circumstances for the safety of the respondent, the law enforcement officer, and other persons. Every effort to avoid restraint of a child under the age of 10 shall be made by the transporting officer unless the child’s behavior or other circumstances dictate that restraint is necessary. The law enforcement officer shall respond to all inquiries from the facility concerning the respondent’s behavior and the use of any restraints related to the custody and transportation of the respondent, except in circumstances where providing that information is confidential or would otherwise compromise a law enforcement investigation. No law enforcement officer or other person designated or required to provide custody or transport of a client under G.S. 122C-251 may be held criminally or civilly liable for assault, false imprisonment, or other torts or crimes on account of reasonable measures taken under the authority of this Article.
  6. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this section, a clerk, a magistrate, or a district court judge, where applicable, may authorize either a health care provider of the respondent or the family or immediate friends of the respondent, if they so request, to transport the respondent in accordance with the procedures of this Article. This authorization shall only be granted in cases where the danger to the public, the health care provider of the respondent, the family or friends of the respondent, or the respondent himself or herself is not substantial. The health care provider of the respondent or the family or immediate friends of the respondent shall bear the costs of providing this transportation.
  7. The governing body of a city or county shall adopt a plan known as an “involuntary commitment transportation agreement” or “transportation agreement” for the custody and transportation of respondents in involuntary commitment proceedings under this Article as follows:
    1. Law enforcement and other affected agencies, including local acute care hospitals and other mental health providers, shall participate in developing the transportation agreement. The area authority may participate in developing the transportation agreement.
    2. The transportation agreement may designate law enforcement officers, volunteers, or other public or private personnel who have agreed pursuant to subsection (g) of this section to provide all or parts of the custody and transportation required by involuntary commitment proceedings. Persons so designated or otherwise required to provide all or parts of the custody and transportation required by involuntary commitment proceedings shall be trained as set forth in G.S. 122C-202.2(a)(3), and the plan shall assure adequate safety and protections for both the public and the respondent. Any person or agency designated or required to provide all or parts of the custody and transportation required by involuntary commitment proceedings shall follow the procedures in this Article. References in this Article to a law enforcement officer apply to any person or entity designated to provide custody or transportation. The transportation agreement may provide that private personnel or agencies may contract for transportation services to transport respondents under involuntary commitment from one entity to another.
    3. A person shall not be designated under subsection (g) of this section without that person’s written consent and the written consent of his or her employer, if applicable. An agency, corporation, or entity shall not be designated without the written consent of that agency, corporation, or entity. Any person, agency, corporation, or other entity shall be designated to provide only the services which the person, agency, corporation, or other entity has previously consented in writing to provide and shall be permitted to withdraw from or discontinue providing services, in whole or in part, upon written notice to the designating governing body. The transportation agreement shall be submitted to the magistrates in the city or county’s judicial district, to the county clerks of court, to the LME/MCO that serves the city or county, and to the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services on or before January 1, 2019. If the city or county modifies the transportation agreement, it will submit the modified agreement to their magistrates in their judicial district, county clerks of court, the LME/MCO that serves the city or county, and the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services at least 10 days prior to the effective date of the new plan.
    4. Counties and cities shall retain and be required to perform the responsibilities set forth in this Article, except as set forth in a plan developed, agreed upon, and adopted in compliance with this subsection.
  8. The cost and expenses of custody and transportation of a respondent as required by the involuntary commitment procedures of this Article, to the extent they are not reimbursed by a third-party insurer, are the responsibility of the county of residence of the respondent. The State (when providing transportation under G.S. 122C-408(b) ), a city, or a county is entitled to recover the reasonable cost of transportation from the county of residence of the respondent. The county of residence of the respondent shall reimburse the State, another county, or a city the reasonable transportation costs incurred as authorized by this subsection. The county of residence of the respondent is entitled to recover the reasonable cost of transportation it has paid to the State, a city, or a county. Provided that the county of residence provides the respondent or other individual liable for the respondent’s support a reasonable notice and opportunity to object to the reimbursement, the county of residence of the respondent may recover that cost from:
    1. The respondent, if the respondent is not indigent;
    2. Any person or entity that is legally liable for the resident’s support and maintenance provided there is sufficient property to pay the cost;
    3. Any person or entity that is contractually responsible for the cost; or
    4. Any person or entity that otherwise is liable under federal, State, or local law for the cost.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 32; Rev., s. 4555; 1919, c. 326, s. 4; C.S., ss. 6201, 6202; 1945, c. 952, ss. 29, 30; 1953, c. 256, s. 6; 1961, c. 186; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1969, c. 982; 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, ss. 21, 22; 1983, c. 138, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 268; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 4; 1999-201, s. 1; 1999-456, s. 36; 2015-176, s. 2.5(a); 2018-33, s. 19; 2019-240, s. 26(f); 2021-138, s. 6(a).

Local Modification.

Ashe: 2013-114, s. 1; Cumberland: 2013-114, s. 1; Wilkes: 2013-114, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

The bracketed “of this section” in the first sentence of subsections (a) and (b) were inserted at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 19, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-138, s. 6(b), made the amendments to subsection (f) of this section by Session Laws 2021-138, s. 6(a), effective October 1, 2021, and applicable to custody orders issued on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-138, s. 22(a), is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2015-176, s. 2.5(a), effective August 5, 2015, added “To the extent feasible” at the beginning of subsection (d) and made a related change.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 19, substituted “Custody and transportation” for “Transportation” in the section catchline; in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “subsections (c), (f), and (g)” for “subsections (f) and (g)” and in the second and third sentences, added “physically”; in subsection (b), in the first sentence, substituted “subsections (c), (f), and (g)” for “subsections (f) and (g)” and added “for a first examination as described in G.S. 122C-263(a) and G.S. 122C-283(a) and”; in subsection (c), in the first sentence, substituted “(i) by city- or county-owned vehicles, (ii) by private vehicle by contract with the city or county, or (iii) as provided in an agreement developed and adopted under subsection (g) of this section and G.S. 122C-202.2 ” for “by city- or county-owned vehicles or by private vehicle by contract with the city or county” and in the last sentence, added “taken into custody”; rewrote subsections (e) and (g); in subsection (h), in the introductory paragraph, substituted “of custody and transportation of a respondent as required by the involuntary commitment procedures of this Article, to the extent they are not reimbursed by a third-party insurer, are the responsibility of the county of residence of the respondent, to the extent they are not reimbursed by a third-party insurer” for “of transporting a respondent to or from a 24-hour facility is the responsibility of the county of residence of the respondent”; and made minor gender neutral and punctuation changes throughout. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(f), effective November 6, 2019, deleted “to the extent they are not reimbursed by a third-party insurer” following “residence of the respondent” in the first sentence in subsection (h).

Session Laws 2021-138, s. 6(a), in subsection (f), inserted “either a health care provider of the respondent or”, “the health care provider of the respondent”, and “health care provider of the respondent or the” and made a stylistic change. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “One Size Only Fits Some: Presuming Custody for the Involuntarily Committed,” see 97 N.C.L. Rev. 1014 (2019).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Former G.S. 122-58.14 (see now this section) required a city to provide the transportation necessary to take a resident of the city who was being processed for involuntary commitment to a community mental health facility which was located outside of the city but inside of the same county. Opinion of Attorney General to Mr. W.B. Trevorrow, 7 October 1975.

§ 122C-252. Twenty-four hour facilities for custody and treatment of involuntary clients.

State facilities, 24-hour facilities licensed under this Chapter or hospitals licensed under Chapter 131E may be designated by the Secretary as facilities for the custody and treatment of involuntary clients. Designation of these facilities shall be made in accordance with rules of the Secretary that assure the protection of the client and the general public. Facilities so designated may detain a client under the procedures of Parts 7 and 8 of this Article both before a district court hearing and after commitment of the respondent.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 4; c. 679, s. 8; c. 739, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 27; c. 915, s. 4; 1983, c. 380, ss. 4, 10; c. 638, ss. 6, 7, 25.1; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Custody. —

Following a first examination, custody continues with law enforcement until the respondent is transferred to a 24-hour facility for the custody and treatment of involuntary clients, or, in cases where commitment is not recommended, returned to a residence and released from custody; the legislature has not seen fit to confer custody of an involuntary commitment respondent on anyone other than law enforcement or other person properly designated prior to and during a first examination. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

No Special Relationship Imposed Liability. —

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because healthcare providers did not have custody of or a legal right to control a patient when conducting their first examination, and thus, no special relationship was created imposing liability; the county sheriff’s department assumed custody of the patient until he was delivered to a 24-hour facility or transported to his home or the home of a consenting individual. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

CASE NOTES

Custody. —

Following a first examination, custody continues with law enforcement until the respondent is transferred to a 24-hour facility for the custody and treatment of involuntary clients, or, in cases where commitment is not recommended, returned to a residence and released from custody; the legislature has not seen fit to confer custody of an involuntary commitment respondent on anyone other than law enforcement or other person properly designated prior to and during a first examination. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

No Special Relationship Imposed Liability. —

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because healthcare providers did not have custody of or a legal right to control a patient when conducting their first examination, and thus, no special relationship was created imposing liability; the county sheriff’s department assumed custody of the patient until he was delivered to a 24-hour facility or transported to his home or the home of a consenting individual. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

§ 122C-253. Fees under commitment order.

Nothing contained in Parts 6, 7, or 8 of this Article requires a private physician, private psychologist, commitment examiner, or private facility to accept a respondent as a client either before or after commitment. Treatment at a private facility or by a private physician, psychologist, or commitment examiner is at the expense of the respondent to the extent that the charges are not disposed of by contract between the area authority and the private facility. An area authority and its contract agencies shall set and recover fees for inpatient or outpatient treatment services provided under a commitment order in accordance with G.S. 122C-146 .

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 8; c. 739, s. 2; 1979, c. 358, s. 26; c. 915, ss. 8, 15, 16; 1981, c. 537, s. 1; 1983, c. 380, s. 8; c. 638, s. 14; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 3; 2018-33, s. 20.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 20, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 20, inserted “commitment examiner,” in the first sentence; and substituted “physician, psychologist, or commitment examiner” for “physician or private psychologist” in the second sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-254. Housing responsibility for certain clients in or escapees from involuntary commitment.

  1. Any individual who has been involuntarily committed under the provisions of this Article to a 24-hour facility:
    1. Who escapes from or is absent without authorization from the facility before being discharged; and
    2. Who is charged with a criminal offense committed after the escape or during the unauthorized absence; and
    3. Whose involuntary commitment is determined to be still valid by the judge or judicial officer who would make the pretrial release determination regarding the criminal offense under the provisions of G.S. 15A-533 and G.S. 15A-534 ; or
    4. Who is charged with committing a crime while still residing in the facility and whose commitment is still valid as prescribed by subdivision (3) of this section; shall be denied pretrial release pursuant to G.S. 15A-533 and G.S. 15A-534 . In lieu of pretrial release, and pending the additional proceedings on the criminal offense, the individual shall be returned to the 24-hour facility in which he was residing at the time of the alleged crime or from which he escaped or absented himself for continuation of his commitment.
  2. Absent findings of lack of mental responsibility for his criminal offense or lack of competency to stand trial for the criminal offense, the involuntary commitment of an individual as described in subsection (a) of this section shall not be utilized in lieu of nor shall it constitute a bar to proceeding to trial for the criminal offense. At any time that the district court or the responsible professional of the 24-hour facility finds that the individual should be unconditionally discharged, committed for outpatient treatment, or conditionally released, the facility shall notify the clerk of superior court in the county in which the criminal charge is pending before making the change in status. At this time, a pretrial release determination pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 15A-533 and G.S. 15A-534 shall be made. In this event, arrangements for returning the individual for the pretrial release determination shall be the responsibility of the clerk of superior court.
  3. An individual who has been processed in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section may not later be returned to a 24-hour facility before trial except pursuant to involuntary commitment proceedings by the district court in accordance with Parts 7 and 8 of this Article or after proceedings in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 15A-1002 or G.S. 15A-1321 .
  4. Other involuntarily committed respondents who escape, but do not meet the additional criteria specified in subsection (a) of this section, are handled in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 122C-205 .

History. 1981, c. 936, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-255. Report required.

Each 24-hour facility that (i) falls under the category of nonhospital medical detoxification, facility-based crisis service, or inpatient hospital treatment, (ii) is not a State facility under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and (iii) is designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as a facility for the custody and treatment of individuals under a petition of involuntary commitment pursuant to G.S. 122C-252 and 10A NCAC 26C.0101 shall submit a written report on involuntary commitments each January 1 and each July 1 to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. The report shall include all of the following:

  1. The number and primary presenting conditions of individuals receiving treatment from the facility under a petition of involuntary commitment.

    (1a) The transportation method utilized by individuals admitted under a petition of involuntary commitment to the 24-hour facility.

    (1b) The number of individuals moved to voluntary status at any time between arrival at the 24-hour facility and completion of the required 24-hour examination.

  2. The number of individuals for whom an involuntary commitment proceeding was initiated at the facility, who were referred to a different facility or program.
  3. The reason for referring the individuals described in subdivision (2) of this section to a different facility or program, including the need for more intensive medical supervision.

History. 2011-346, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 21; 2021-77, s. 5.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-346, s. 2, was codified as G.S. 122C-255 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 21, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 21, substituted “Each 24-hour facility” for “Beginning January 1, 2012, each 24-hour residential facility” in the introductory paragraph. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 5, effective July 2, 2021, added subdivisions (1a) and (1b).

§§ 122C-256 through 122C-260.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 7. Involuntary Commitment of the Mentally Ill; Facilities for the Mentally Ill.

§ 122C-261. Affidavit and petition before clerk or magistrate when immediate hospitalization is not necessary; custody order.

  1. Anyone who has knowledge of an individual who has a mental illness and is either (i) dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or dangerous to others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b., or (ii) in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness, may appear before a clerk or assistant or deputy clerk of superior court or a magistrate and execute an affidavit to this effect, and petition the clerk or magistrate for issuance of an order to take the respondent into custody for examination by a commitment examiner. The affidavit shall include the facts on which the affiant’s opinion is based. If the affiant has knowledge or reasonably believes that the respondent, in addition to having a mental illness, also has an intellectual disability, this fact shall be stated in the affidavit. Jurisdiction under this subsection is in the clerk or magistrate in the county where the respondent resides or is found.
  2. If the clerk or magistrate finds reasonable grounds to believe that the facts alleged in the affidavit are true and that the respondent probably has a mental illness and is either (i) dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or dangerous to others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b., or (ii) in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer or any other designated person under G.S. 122C-251(g) to take the respondent into custody for examination by a commitment examiner. If the clerk or magistrate finds that, in addition to probably having a mental illness, the respondent also probably has an intellectual disability, the clerk or magistrate shall contact the area authority before issuing a custody order and the area authority shall designate the facility to which the respondent is to be taken for examination by a commitment examiner. The clerk or magistrate shall provide the petitioner and the respondent, if present, with specific information regarding the next steps that will occur for the respondent.
  3. If the clerk or magistrate issues a custody order, the clerk or magistrate shall also make inquiry in any reliable way as to whether the respondent is indigent within the meaning of G.S. 7A-450 . A magistrate shall report the result of this inquiry to the clerk.
  4. If the affiant is a commitment examiner, all of the following apply:
    1. If the affiant has examined the respondent, the affiant may execute the affidavit before any official authorized to administer oaths. This affiant is not required to appear before the clerk or magistrate for this purpose. This affiant shall file the affidavit with the clerk or magistrate by delivering to the clerk or magistrate the original affidavit, by transmitting a copy in paper form that is printed through the facsimile transmission of the affidavit, or by delivering the affidavit through electronic transmission. If the affidavit is filed through electronic or facsimile transmission, the affiant shall mail the original affidavit no later than five days after the facsimile transmission of the affidavit to the clerk or magistrate to be filed by the clerk or magistrate with the facsimile copy of the affidavit.
    2. This affiant’s examination shall comply with the requirements of the initial examination as provided in G.S. 122C-263(c). The affiant shall document in writing and file the examination findings with the affidavit delivered to the clerk or magistrate in accordance with subdivision (1) of subsection (d) of this section.
    3. If the commitment examiner recommends outpatient commitment according to the criteria for outpatient commitment set forth in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1) and the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order that a hearing before a district court judge be held to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed. The commitment examiner shall contact the LME/MCO that serves the county where the respondent resides or the LME/MCO that coordinated services for the respondent to inform the LME/MCO that the respondent has been scheduled for an appointment with an outpatient treatment physician or center. The commitment examiner shall provide the respondent with written notice of any scheduled appointment and the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center.
    4. If the commitment examiner recommends inpatient commitment based on the criteria for inpatient commitment set forth in G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent meets the criteria for inpatient commitment, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody for transportation to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 , provided that if a 24-hour facility is not immediately available or appropriate to the respondent’s medical condition, the respondent may be temporarily detained under appropriate supervision and, upon further examination, released in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(d)(2).
    5. If the affiant is a physician or eligible psychologist at a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 who recommends inpatient commitment; the respondent is physically present on the premises of the same 24-hour facility; and the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent meets the criteria for inpatient commitment, then the clerk or magistrate may issue an order by facsimile transmission or may issue an electronically scanned order by electronic transmission to the physician or eligible psychologist at the 24-hour facility, or a designee, to take the respondent into custody at the 24-hour facility and proceed according to G.S. 122C-266 . Upon receipt of the custody order, the physician or eligible psychologist at the 24-hour facility, or a designee, shall immediately (i) notify the respondent that the respondent is not under arrest and has not committed a crime but is being taken into custody to receive treatment and for the respondent’s own safety and the safety of others, (ii) take the respondent into custody, and (iii) complete and sign the appropriate portion of the custody order and return the order to the clerk or magistrate either by facsimile transmission or by scanning it and sending it by electronic transmission. The physician or eligible psychologist, or a designee, shall mail the original custody order no later than five days after returning it by means of facsimile or electronic transmission to the clerk or magistrate. The clerk or magistrate shall file the original custody order with the copy of the custody order that was electronically returned.Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, a clerk or magistrate shall not issue a custody order to a physician or eligible psychologist at a 24-hour facility, or a designee, if the physician or eligible psychologist, or a designee, has not completed training in proper service and return of service. As used in this subdivision, the term “designee” includes the 24-hour facility’s on-site police security personnel.The Department of Health and Human Services shall cooperate and collaborate with the Administrative Office of the Courts and the UNC School of Government to develop protocols to implement this section, including a procedure for notifying clerks and magistrates of the names of the physicians, psychologists, and designees who have completed the training. The Secretary of the Department shall oversee implementation of these protocols.
    6. If the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent, in addition to having a mental illness, also has an intellectual disability, the clerk or magistrate shall contact the area authority before issuing the order and the area authority shall designate the facility to which the respondent is to be transported.
    7. If a commitment examiner executes an affidavit for inpatient commitment of a respondent, a physician who is not the commitment examiner who performed the examination under this section shall be required to perform the examination required by G.S. 122C-266 .
    8. No commitment examiner, area facility, acute care hospital, general hospital, or other site of first examination, or its officials, staff, employees, or other individuals responsible for the custody, examination, detention, management, supervision, treatment, or release of an individual examined for commitment, who is not grossly negligent, shall be held liable in any civil or criminal action for taking measures to temporarily detain an individual for the period of time necessary to complete a commitment examination, submit an affidavit to the magistrate or clerk of court, and await the issuance of a custody order as authorized by this section.
  5. Except as provided in subdivision (5) of subsection (d) of this section, upon receipt of the custody order of the clerk or magistrate or a custody order issued by the court pursuant to G.S. 15A-1003 , a law enforcement officer, person designated under G.S. 122C-251(g), or other person identified in the order shall take the respondent into custody within 24 hours after the order is signed, and proceed according to G.S. 122C-263 . The custody order is valid throughout the State.Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, in no event shall an individual known or reasonably believed to have an intellectual disability be admitted to a State psychiatric hospital, except the following:
    1. Persons described in G.S. 122C-266(b).
    2. Persons admitted pursuant to G.S. 15A-1321 .
    3. Respondents who are so extremely dangerous as to pose a serious threat to the community and to other patients committed to non-State hospital psychiatric inpatient units, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.
    4. Respondents who are so gravely disabled by both multiple disorders and medical fragility or multiple disorders and deafness that alternative care is inappropriate, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.Individuals transported to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses who are not admitted by the facility may be transported by appropriate law enforcement officers or designated staff of the State facility in State-owned vehicles to an appropriate 24-hour facility that provides psychiatric inpatient care.No later than 24 hours after the transfer, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the petitioner, the clerk of court, and, if consent is granted by the respondent, the next of kin, that the transfer has been completed.
  6. Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, effective October 1, 2019.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 3; 1979, c. 164, s. 2; c. 915, ss. 3, 18; 1983, c. 383, s. 5; c. 638, ss. 3-5; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, ss. 2, 4; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 17; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, ss. 1, 2; c. 1024, s. 27.1; 1991, c. 37, s. 7; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 6; 1997-456, s. 47; 2004-23, s. 1(a); 2005-135, s. 1; 2009-315, s. 1; 2009-340, s. 1; 2013-308, ss. 1, 2; 2018-33, s. 22; 2019-76, s. 7; 2019-240, s. 26(g).

Cross References.

As to establishment of guidelines for treatment of individuals involuntarily committed following a determination of incapacity to proceed, see G.S. 143B-147(e).

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2006-2007 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Editor’s note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 22, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 7 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-23, s. 1(a), effective June, 25, 2004, added the last sentence in subsection (e).

Session Laws 2005-135, s. 1, effective June 29, 2005, added the present third and fourth sentences of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2009-315, s. 1, effective July 17, 2009, added the eighth sentence of subsection (d).

Session Laws 2009-340, s. 1, effective October 1, 2009, in subsection (d), added the proviso at the end of the ninth sentence, and deleted “However” from the beginning of the next-to-last sentence.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 22, substituted “commitment examiner” for “physician or eligible psychologist” throughout the section; in subsection (b), in the first sentence, substituted “designated person under G.S. 122C-251 (g)” for “person authorized under G.S. 122C-251 ”; in subdivision (d)(1), in the first sentence, substituted “If the affiant has examined the respondent, the affiant” for “The affiant,” in the second sentence, substituted “affidavit, by transmitting” for “affidavit or” near the middle, and substituted “affidavit, or by delivering the affidavit through electronic transmission” for “affidavit” at the end; and in the third sentence, inserted “electronic or”; in subdivision (d)(2), added the last sentence; in subdivision (d)(3), in the first sentence, added “according to the criteria for outpatient commitment set forth in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1),” deleted the former second sentence, which read: “The physician or eligible psychologist shall provide the respondent with written notice of any scheduled appointment and the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center.”; in the present second sentence, substituted “LME/MCO” for “local management entity” three times, and added the last sentence; in subdivision (d)(4), inserted “based on the criteria for inpatient commitment set forth in G.S. 122C-263(d)(2),” and substituted “to a law enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody for transportation to a 24-hour facility” for “for transportation to or custody at a 24-hour facility”; in subdivision (d)(7), substituted “a physician who is not the commitment examiner who performed the examination under this section” for “a second physician”; added subdivision (d)(8); in subsection (e), substituted “law enforcement officer, person designated under G.S. 122C-251(g), or other person identified” for “law enforcement officer or other person designated”; deleted the former first paragraph of subsection (f) and redesignated the former second through fourth paragraphs of subsection (f) as the second through fourth paragraphs of subsection (e); and, in the next to last paragraph of subsection (e), added “appropriate.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 7, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(g), effective November 6, 2019, substituted “to temporarily detain an individual for the period of time necessary to complete a commitment examination, submit an affidavit to the magistrate or clerk of court, and await the issuance of a custody order as authorized by this section” for “prior to the inpatient admission of the individual to a 24-hour facility” at the end of subdivision (d)(8).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

For comment, “Senate Bill 43: A Refinement of North Carolina’s Involuntary Civil Commitment Procedures,” see 14 Campbell L. Rev. 105 (1992).

For note, “Helplessly Imprisoned: State v. Hammonds Holds Involuntarily Committed Patients to the Same Constitutional Restraints as Prisoners,” see 38 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 173 (2016).

For article, “One Size Only Fits Some: Presuming Custody for the Involuntarily Committed,” see 97 N.C.L. Rev. 1014 (2019).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Some of the cases cited below were decided under former statutory provisions.

Common Law. —

At common law there was a right to detain a mentally ill person in order to protect such person from self-injury and the public from injury at the hands of such deranged person. This doubtless accounts for the action of the legislature in authorizing such an emergency commitment. The action of the legislature supplanted the common-law rule. Samons v. Meymandi, 9 N.C. App. 490, 177 S.E.2d 209, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1392 (1970), cert. denied, 277 N.C. 458 , 178 S.E.2d 225, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 1041 (1971).

Right to trial by jury did not exist at common law in insanity proceedings and was thus not required under former G.S. 122-58.3. In re Taylor, 25 N.C. App. 642, 215 S.E.2d 789, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2350 (1975).

A commitment order is essentially a judgment by which a person is deprived of his liberty, and as a result, he is entitled to the safeguard of a determination by a neutral officer of the court that reasonable grounds exist for his original detention, just as he would be if he were to be deprived of liberty in a criminal context. In re Reed, 39 N.C. App. 227, 249 S.E.2d 864, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2363 (1978).

Requirements of former G.S. 122-58.3 (see now G.S. 122C-261 and G.S. 122C-281 ) were required to be followed diligently. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980); In re Barnhill, 72 N.C. App. 530, 325 S.E.2d 308, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3106 (1985).

Contents and Sufficiency of Affidavit. —

The affidavit must set out facts upon which the affiant’s opinion is based. Such facts must be sufficient to establish to the affiant’s satisfaction that the patient is imminently dangerous to himself or others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

Petition for involuntary commitment which was not confirmed by oath or affirmation before a duly authorized certifying officer did not comply with the requirements of former G.S. 122-58.3(a) (see now G.S. 122C-261 and G.S. 122C-281 ) and could not serve as a basis for involuntary commitment. In re Ingram, 74 N.C. App. 579, 328 S.E.2d 588, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3502 (1985).

Insufficient Affidavit. —

An affidavit which stated that the respondent was “believed to have been on drugs for a number of years,” was “so mixed up,” and was “at a place where he is dangerous to himself” was insufficient to establish reasonable grounds for the issuance of a custody order. In re Reed, 39 N.C. App. 227, 249 S.E.2d 864, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2363 (1978).

No Duty to Third Parties. —

When a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding is delivered to a hospital for an initial examination to recommend whether commitment is required, neither the examiner nor the hospital obtains custody or a legal right to control the respondent unless and until involuntary commitment is recommended; neither the examiner nor the facility owes a duty to third parties for harm resulting from an examiner’s recommendation, even if the examination failed to comply with statutory requirements. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Control Over Respondent. —

While it is the finding by the physician that directly results in the restraint of the respondent, the examiner at a first examination is empowered only to make certain findings, and it is only after specific findings are made that control is exercised. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Examiner has no discretion whether or not to release a respondent, but it is the statutes that dictate the result on the basis of the examiner’s findings, and the examiner is not authorized by law to deviate from those statutorily-imposed results; nor may the examiner assume control over the respondent, and thus, in short a right or duty to make a determination that may result in assuming a legal right to control is distinct from the legal right to control itself. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Waiver of Challenge to Sufficiency of Affidavit. —

Complainant waived any challenge to the sufficiency of the affidavit to support a magistrate’s original custody order because the complainant failed to raise the issue of the sufficiency of the affidavit during the first involuntary commitment hearing and the record did not reflect that the complainant raised it at any of the four recommitment hearings preceding the complainant’s appeal. In re Moore, 234 N.C. App. 37, 758 S.E.2d 33, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 490 (2014).

No Special Relationship Imposed Liability. —

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because the nature of the duty imposed, in light of the particulars of the statutory scheme, was insufficient to impose a “special relationship” between healthcare providers and the patient; the healthcare providers had no right to control the patient at the time of the alleged breach of duty to him because it occurred prior to his admission to their care. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Jurisdiction. —

In a case in which a trial court’s order recommitted a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment and the patient argued that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, while he used the phrase subject matter jurisdiction, he was actually arguing that the trial court did not have authority to order an 180-day commitment under G.S. 122C-271(b). There was no dispute that the trial court had authority to adjudicate the issues in dispute and had jurisdiction over the parties, as a result, the trial court’s May 21, 2007 order was not void, even if contrary to law; the trial court obtained jurisdiction over the civil commitment proceedings when the petition and affidavit were filed pursuant to G.S. 122C-261 . In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Statement Held Not to Establish Grounds for Commitment. —

Statement that “respondent has strange behavior and irrational in her thinking” was not a statement of fact but a pure conclusion of the affiant, and did not suffice to establish reasonable grounds for issuance of commitment order. In re Ingram, 74 N.C. App. 579, 328 S.E.2d 588, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3502 (1985).

Statement Held Not to Establish Mental Illness or Dangerousness. —

Statements that respondent “Leaves home and no one knows of her whereabouts, and at times spends the night away from home. Accuses husband of improprieties” did not establish facts showing or tending to show that respondent was mentally ill or dangerous to herself or others. In re Ingram, 74 N.C. App. 579, 328 S.E.2d 588, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3502 (1985).

Effect of G.S. 8-53 . —

For discussion of former statutory provisions making it manifest that the physician’s role in involuntary commitment proceedings was not intended to be inhibited by G.S. 8-53 , see In re Farrow, 41 N.C. App. 680, 255 S.E.2d 777, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2728 (1979).

Defenses of Insanity and Unconsciousness Distinguished. —

The defenses of insanity and unconsciousness are not the same; a defendant found not guilty by reason of unconsciousness, as distinct from insanity, is not subject to commitment to a hospital for the mentally ill; however, such a defendant is subject to involuntary commitment to a facility for the mentally ill if found in a civil commitment proceeding to be mentally ill and either dangerous to himself or others or in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness. State v. Fields, 324 N.C. 204 , 376 S.E.2d 740, 1989 N.C. LEXIS 94 (1989).

Denial of Gun Permit Not Warranted. —

G.S. 14-404(c)(4) did not support the denial of a gun permit application to an applicant since the G.S. 122C-261(e) , 122C-262 122C-263, 122C-266, and 122C-268 requirements were not met, even though the applicant was taken for an involuntary psychiatric examination when the applicant was 21 years old; neither inpatient nor outpatient commitment was recommended. Waldron v. Batten, 191 N.C. App. 237, 662 S.E.2d 568, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193 (2008).

Excessive Force. —

Where a decedent was tased when officers executed an involuntary commitment order on the decedent, the officers used unreasonably excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment because, inter alia, immediately tasing a non-criminal, mentally ill individual, who seconds before had been conversational, was not a proportional response; however, the officers were entitled to qualified immunity as to the excessive force claim because the decedent’s right not to be tased while offering stationary and non-violent resistance to a lawful seizure was not clearly established. Estate of Armstrong v. Village of Pinehurst, 810 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 380 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 61, 196 L. Ed. 2d 32, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5064 (2016).

§ 122C-262. Special emergency procedure for individuals needing immediate hospitalization.

  1. Anyone, including a law enforcement officer, who has knowledge of an individual who is subject to inpatient commitment according to the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and who requires immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self or others, may transport the individual directly to an area facility or other place, including a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses, for examination by a commitment examiner in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(c).
  2. Upon examination by the commitment examiner, if the individual meets the inpatient commitment criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and requires immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self or others, the commitment examiner shall so certify in writing before any official authorized to administer oaths. The certificate shall also state the reason that the individual requires immediate hospitalization. If the commitment examiner knows or has reason to believe that the individual has an intellectual disability, the certificate shall so state.
  3. If the commitment examiner executes the oath, appearance before a magistrate shall be waived. The commitment examiner shall send a copy of the certificate to the clerk of superior court by the most reliable and expeditious means. If it cannot be reasonably anticipated that the clerk will receive the copy within 24 hours, excluding Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, of the time that it was signed, the physician or eligible psychologist shall also communicate the findings to the clerk by telephone.
  4. Anyone, including a law enforcement officer if necessary, may transport the individual to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 for examination and treatment pending a district court hearing. If there is no area 24-hour facility and if the respondent is indigent and unable to pay for care at a private 24-hour facility, the law enforcement officer or other designated person providing transportation shall take the respondent to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses designated by the Commission in accordance with G.S. 143B-147(a)(1)a. and immediately notify the clerk of superior court of this action. The commitment examiner’s certificate shall serve as the custody order and the law enforcement officer or other designated person shall provide transportation in accordance with G.S. 122C-251 . If a 24-hour facility is not immediately available or appropriate to the respondent’s medical condition, the respondent may be temporarily detained under appropriate supervision in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and released in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(d)(2).In the event an individual known or reasonably believed to have an intellectual disability is transported to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses, in no event shall that individual be admitted to that facility unless the individual is in one or more of the following categories:
    1. Persons described in G.S. 122C-266(b).
    2. Persons admitted pursuant to G.S. 15A-1321 .
    3. Respondents who are so extremely dangerous as to pose a serious threat to the community and to other patients committed to non-State hospital psychiatric inpatient units, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.
    4. Respondents who are so gravely disabled by both multiple disorders and medical fragility or multiple disorders and deafness that alternative care is inappropriate, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.Individuals transported to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses who are not admitted by the facility may be transported by law enforcement officers or designated staff of the State facility in State-owned vehicles to an appropriate 24-hour facility that provides psychiatric inpatient care.No later than 24 hours after the transfer, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the petitioner, the clerk of court, and, if consent is granted by the respondent, the next of kin, that the transfer has been completed.
  5. Respondents received at a 24-hour facility under this section shall be examined by a second physician in accordance with G.S. 122C-266 . After receipt of notification that the district court has determined reasonable grounds for the commitment, further proceedings shall be carried out in the same way as for all other respondents under this Part.
  6. If, upon examination of a respondent presented in accordance with subsection (a) of this section, the commitment examiner finds that the individual meets the criteria for inpatient commitment specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) but does not require immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self or others, the commitment examiner may petition the clerk or magistrate in accordance with G.S. 122C-261(d) for an order to take the individual into custody for transport to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 . If the commitment examiner recommends inpatient commitment and the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent meets the criteria for inpatient commitment, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order for transport to or custody at a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 . If, however, a 24-hour facility is not immediately available or appropriate to the respondent’s medical condition, the respondent may be temporarily detained under appropriate supervision in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and released in accordance with G.S. 122C-263(d)(2).
  7. This section applies exclusively to an individual who is transported to an area facility or other place for an examination by a commitment examiner in accordance with subsection (a) of this section.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 1987, c. 596, s. 1; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 7; 2018-33, s. 23; 2019-76, s. 8.

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2006-2007 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Editor’s note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 23, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 8 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 23, substituted “commitment examiner” for “physician or eligible psychologist” throughout the section; in subsection (a), substituted “G.S. 122C-263(d)(2)” for “G.S. 122C-261(a)”; in subsection (b), in the first sentence, substituted “inpatient commitment criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and requires immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to self or others, the commitment examiner” for “criteria required in G.S. 122C-261(a) , the physician or eligible psychologist”; in subsection (d), in the first paragraph, added the last sentence; and added subsections (f) and (g). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 8, substituted “individuals with mental illnesses” for “the mentally ill” near the end of subsection (a); substituted “has an intellectual disability” for “is mentally retarded” in the last sentence of subsection (b); rewrote subsection (d); deleted “the provisions of” preceding “this section” in the first sentence of subsection (e); and substituted “G.S. 122C-252. If, however,” for “G.S. 122C-252; provided, however, that if” in the last sentence of subsection (f). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s notes.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

CASE NOTES

Former G.S. 122-58.18 (see now G.S. 122C-262 and 122C-282) was not intended to be used indiscriminately and clearly defined the limited time and circumstances for such use. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780 (1980), decided under former statutory provisions.

Affidavit. —

The affidavit must set out facts upon which the affiant’s opinion is based. Such facts must be sufficient to establish to the affiant’s satisfaction that the patient is imminently dangerous to himself or others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780 (1980), decided under former statutory provisions.

Reliance on Information Gained from Others. —

An officer’s petition for involuntary commitment of respondent pursuant to the emergency procedures for violent persons was not required to be dismissed because the officer did not personally observe the respondent in an act of violence but relied on information gained from others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780 (1980), decided under former statutory provisions.

Defendant required immediate hospitalization to prevent harm to himself, pursuant to this section, evidenced by the testimony that when appellant abruptly left the doctor’s office, he said he was going to kill himself. In re Woodie, 116 N.C. App. 425, 448 S.E.2d 142, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 1045 (1994).

No Overt Act Required. —

In finding one to be imminently dangerous, there is no requirement of an overt act. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780 (1980), decided under former statutory provisions.

Concealing a potentially dangerous weapon is evidence of imminent danger. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780 (1980), decided under former statutory provisions.

Denial of Gun Permit Not Warranted. —

G.S. 14-404(c)(4) did not support the denial of a gun permit application to an applicant since the G.S. 122C-261(e) , 122C-262, 122C-263, 122C-266, and 122C-268 requirements were not met, even though the applicant was taken for an involuntary psychiatric examination when the applicant was 21 years old; neither inpatient nor outpatient commitment was recommended. Waldron v. Batten, 191 N.C. App. 237, 662 S.E.2d 568, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193 (2008).

Excessive Force. —

Where a decedent was tased when officers executed an involuntary commitment order on the decedent, the officers used unreasonably excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment because, inter alia, immediately tasing a non-criminal, mentally ill individual, who seconds before had been conversational, was not a proportional response; however, the officers were entitled to qualified immunity as to the excessive force claim because the decedent’s right not to be tased while offering stationary and non-violent resistance to a lawful seizure was not clearly established. Estate of Armstrong v. Village of Pinehurst, 810 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 380 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 61, 196 L. Ed. 2d 32, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5064 (2016).

Constitutional Protection Not Affected. —

While this section provides permission and procedures to transport those subject to inpatient commitment who require immediate hospitalization to prevent harm, this section does not and cannot lessen the protection provided the mentally ill, or suspected mentally ill, by the Fourth Amendment. White v. Town of Chapel Hill, 899 F. Supp. 1428, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13844 (M.D.N.C.), aff'd, 70 F.3d 1264, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38691 (4th Cir. 1995).

Control Over Respondent. —

While it is the finding by the physician that directly results in the restraint of the respondent, the examiner at a first examination is empowered only to make certain findings, and it is only after specific findings are made that control is exercised. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Examiner has no discretion whether or not to release a respondent, but it is the statutes that dictate the result on the basis of the examiner’s findings, and the examiner is not authorized by law to deviate from those statutorily-imposed results; nor may the examiner assume control over the respondent, and thus, in short a right or duty to make a determination that may result in assuming a legal right to control is distinct from the legal right to control itself. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Illustrative Case. —

Where police had been called to plaintiff’s apartment in relation to a “hostage situation”, plaintiff’s journal notes referenced killing himself and others, and plaintiff refused to come out of his house, police had probable cause under this section to surround plaintiff’s home, ask him to come out, and seize him upon his voluntary exit. White v. Town of Chapel Hill, 899 F. Supp. 1428, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13844 (M.D.N.C.), aff'd, 70 F.3d 1264, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38691 (4th Cir. 1995).

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because the nature of the duty imposed, in light of the particulars of the statutory scheme, was insufficient to impose a “special relationship” between healthcare providers and the patient; the healthcare providers had no right to control the patient at the time of the alleged breach of duty to him because it occurred prior to his admission to their care. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

§ 122C-263. Duties of law enforcement officer; first examination.

  1. Without unnecessary delay after assuming custody, the law enforcement officer or the individual designated or required to provide transportation pursuant to G.S. 122C-251(g) shall take the respondent to a facility or other location identified by the LME/MCO in the community crisis services plan adopted pursuant to G.S. 122C-202.2 that has an available commitment examiner and is capable of performing a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location, unless circumstances indicate the respondent appears to be suffering a medical emergency in which case the law enforcement officer will seek immediate medical assistance for the respondent. If a commitment examiner is not available, whether on-site, on-call, or via telehealth, at any facility or location, or if a plan has not been adopted, the person designated to provide transportation shall take the respondent to an alternative non-hospital provider or facility-based crisis center for a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location. If no non-hospital provider or facility-based crisis center for a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location for health screening and first examination exists, the person designated to provide transportation shall take the respondent to a private hospital or clinic, a general hospital, an acute care hospital, or a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses. If a commitment examiner is not immediately available, the respondent may be temporarily detained in an area facility, if one is available; if an area facility is not available, the respondent may be detained under appropriate supervision in the respondent’s home, in a private hospital or a clinic, in a general hospital, or in a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses, but not in a jail or other penal facility. For the purposes of this section, “non-hospital provider” means an outpatient provider that provides either behavioral health or medical services. (a1) A facility or other location to which a respondent is transported under subsection (a) of this section shall provide a health screening of the respondent. The health screening shall be conducted by a commitment examiner or other individual who is determined by the area facility, contracted facility, or other location to be qualified to perform the health screening. The Department will work with commitment examiner professionals to develop a screening tool for this purpose. The respondent may either be in the physical face-to-face presence of the person conducting the screen or may be examined utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. Documentation of the health screening required under this subsection that is completed prior to transporting the patient to any general hospital, acute care hospital, or designated facility shall accompany the patient or otherwise be made available at the time of transportation to the receiving facility.
  2. The examination set forth in subsection (a) of this section is not required under any of the following circumstances:
    1. The affiant who obtained the custody order is a commitment examiner who recommends inpatient commitment.
    2. The custody order states that the respondent was charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found incapable of proceeding.
    3. Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 596, s. 3. In any of these cases, the law enforcement officer or person designated under G.S. 122C-251(g) shall take the respondent directly to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 .
  3. The commitment examiner described in subsection (a) of this section shall examine the respondent as soon as possible, and in any event within 24 hours after the respondent is presented for examination. When the examination set forth in subsection (a) of this section is performed by a commitment examiner, the respondent may either be in the physical face-to-face presence of the commitment examiner or may be examined utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. A commitment examiner who examines a respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subsection (d) of this section would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. A commitment examiner who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a person authorized to perform examinations under this section. As used in this section, “telehealth” means the use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other. A recipient is referred by one provider to receive the services of another provider via telehealth.The examination shall include an assessment of at least all of the following with respect to the respondent:
    1. Current and previous mental illness and intellectual disability including, if available, previous treatment history.
    2. Dangerousness to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a. or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b.
    3. Ability to survive safely without inpatient commitment, including the availability of supervision from family, friends, or others.
    4. Capacity to make an informed decision concerning treatment.
  4. After the conclusion of the examination the commitment examiner shall make the following determinations:
    1. If the commitment examiner finds all of the following, the commitment examiner shall so show on the examination report and shall recommend outpatient commitment:
      1. The respondent has a mental illness.
      2. The respondent is capable of surviving safely in the community with available supervision from family, friends, or others.
      3. Based on the respondent’s psychiatric history, the respondent is in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness as defined by G.S. 122C-3(11) .
      4. The respondent’s current mental status or the nature of the respondent’s illness limits or negates the respondent’s ability to make an informed decision to seek voluntarily or comply with recommended treatment. In addition, the commitment examiner shall show the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center in accordance with subsection (f) of this section. The person designated in the order to provide transportation shall return the respondent to the respondent’s regular residence or, with the respondent’s consent, to the home of a consenting individual located in the originating county, and the respondent shall be released from custody.
    2. If the commitment examiner finds that the respondent has a mental illness and is dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11)b., the commitment examiner shall recommend inpatient commitment, and shall so show on the examination report. If, in addition to mental illness and dangerousness, the commitment examiner also finds that the respondent is known or reasonably believed to have an intellectual disability, this finding shall be shown on the report. Upon notification, the law enforcement officer or other designated person shall take the respondent to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 pending a district court hearing. To the extent feasible, in providing the transportation of the respondent, the law enforcement officer shall act within six hours of notification. The other designated person shall take the respondent to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 pending a district court hearing within six hours of notification. If there is no area 24-hour facility and if the respondent is indigent and unable to pay for care at a private 24-hour facility, the law enforcement officer or other designated person shall take the respondent to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses designated by the Commission in accordance with G.S. 143B-147(a)(1)a. for custody, observation, and treatment and immediately notify the clerk of superior court of this action. If a 24-hour facility is not immediately available or appropriate to the respondent’s medical condition, the respondent may be temporarily detained under appropriate supervision at the site of the first examination. Upon the commitment examiner’s determination that a 24-hour facility is available and medically appropriate, the law enforcement officer or other designated person shall transport the respondent after receiving a request for transportation by the facility of the commitment examiner. To the extent feasible, in providing the transportation of the respondent, the law enforcement officer shall act within six hours of notification. The other designated person shall transport the respondent without unnecessary delay and within six hours after receiving a request for transportation by the facility of the commitment examiner. At any time during the respondent’s temporary detention under appropriate supervision, if a commitment examiner determines that the respondent is no longer in need of inpatient commitment, the proceedings shall be terminated and the respondent transported and released in accordance with subdivision (3) of this subsection. However, if the commitment examiner determines that the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment, as defined in subdivision (1) of this subsection, the commitment examiner may recommend outpatient commitment, and the respondent shall be transported and released in accordance with subdivision (1) of this subsection. Any decision to terminate the proceedings or to recommend outpatient commitment after an initial recommendation of inpatient commitment shall be documented and reported to the clerk of superior court in accordance with subsection (e) of this section. If the respondent is temporarily detained and a 24-hour facility is not available or medically appropriate seven days after the issuance of the custody order, a commitment examiner shall report this fact to the clerk of superior court and the proceedings shall be terminated. Termination of proceedings pursuant to this subdivision shall not prohibit or prevent the initiation of new involuntary commitment proceedings when appropriate. A commitment examiner may initiate a new involuntary commitment proceeding prior to the expiration of this seven-day period, as long as the respondent continues to meet applicable criteria. Affidavits filed in support of proceedings terminated pursuant to this subdivision shall not be submitted in support of any subsequent petitions for involuntary commitment. If the affiant initiating new commitment proceedings is a commitment examiner, the affiant shall conduct a new examination and shall not rely upon examinations conducted as part of proceedings terminated pursuant to this subdivision.In the event an individual known or reasonably believed to have an intellectual disability is transported to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses, in no event shall that individual be admitted to that facility unless the individual is in one or more of the following categories:
      1. Persons described in G.S. 122C-266(b).
      2. Persons admitted pursuant to G.S. 15A-1321 .
      3. Respondents who are so extremely dangerous as to pose a serious threat to the community and to other patients committed to non-State hospital psychiatric inpatient units, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.
      4. Respondents who are so gravely disabled by both multiple disorders and medical fragility or multiple disorders and deafness that alternative care is inappropriate, as determined by the Director of the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services or the Director’s designee.Individuals transported to a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses who are not admitted by the facility may be transported by law enforcement officers or designated staff of the State facility in State-owned vehicles to an appropriate 24-hour facility that provides psychiatric inpatient care.No later than 24 hours after the transfer, the responsible professional at the original facility shall notify the petitioner, the clerk of court, and, if consent is granted by the respondent, the next of kin, that the transfer has been completed.
    3. If the commitment examiner finds that neither condition described in subdivisions (1) or (2) of this subsection exists, the proceedings shall be terminated. The person designated in the order to provide transportation shall return the respondent to the respondent’s regular residence or, with the respondent’s consent, to the home of a consenting individual located in the originating county and the respondent shall be released from custody.
  5. The findings of the commitment examiner and the facts on which they are based shall be in writing in all cases. The commitment examiner shall send a copy of the findings to the clerk of superior court by the most reliable and expeditious means. If it cannot be reasonably anticipated that the clerk will receive the copy within 48 hours of the time that it was signed, the physician or eligible psychologist shall also communicate his findings to the clerk by telephone.
  6. When outpatient commitment is recommended, the commitment examiner, if different from the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center, shall contact the LME/MCO that serves the county where the respondent resides or the LME/MCO that coordinated services for the respondent to inform the LME/MCO that the respondent is being recommended for outpatient commitment. The commitment examiner shall give the respondent a written notice listing the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center.
  7. The commitment examiner, at the completion of the examination, shall provide the respondent with specific information regarding the next steps that will occur.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 4; c. 679, s. 8; c. 739, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 27; c. 915, s. 4; 1983, c. 380, ss. 4, 10; c. 638, ss. 6, 7, 25.1; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, ss. 2, 5, 6; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 18; 1987, c. 596, s. 3; 1989, c. 225, s. 2; c. 770, s. 74; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, ss. 3, 4; 1991, c. 37, s. 8; c. 636, s. 2(1); c. 761, s. 49; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 8(a)-(d); 2009-315, s. 2; 2009-340, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 24; 2018-76, s. 3.2(a); 2019-76, s. 9; 2019-177, s. 7(a); 2021-77, s. 6(a).

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2006-2007 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Editor’s note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

A period was deleted at the end of the second paragraph of subsection (c) at the direction of the Reviser of Statutes.

This section was amended by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 24 and 2018-76, s. 3.2(a), effective October 1, 2019, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . However, in subsection (a), amendments in each of the acts did not account for the changes made by the other. The first two sentences in subsection (a) have been set out in the form above at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 24, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(c), made the rewriting of subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(a), effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(c), made the amendment of subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(a), effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 9 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-315, s. 2, effective July 17, 2009, added the second through last sentences of subsection (c).

Session Laws 2009-340, s. 2, effective October 1, 2009, added the last seven sentences in the first paragraph of subdivision (d)(2).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 24, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(a), rewrote subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 9, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(a), rewrote subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 6(a), effective July 2, 2021, substituted “telehealth” for “telemedicine” throughout subsections (a), (a1) and (c); and substituted “‘telehealth’ means the use of two way, real time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other” for “‘telemedicine’ is the use of two way real time interactive audio and video between places of lesser and greater medical capability or expertise to provide and support health care when distance separates participants who are in different geographical locations” in subsection (c).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For comment, “Criminal Defendants Deemed Incapable to Proceed to Trial: An Evaluation of North Carolina’s Statutory Scheme,” see 26 Campbell L. Rev. 41 (2004).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Some of the cases cited below were decided under former statutory provisions.

Duty of Physician to Make Examination. —

It was the purpose of former G.S. 122-58.4 that only mentally ill persons in need of restraint be deprived of their liberty. This could only be assured by the doctor making the required examination before executing the certificate. McLean v. Sale, 38 N.C. App. 520, 248 S.E.2d 372, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2230 (1978), cert. denied, 296 N.C. 585 , 254 S.E.2d 32, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1217 (1979).

Former G.S. 122-58.4 imposed a positive duty to make the examination before signing the certificate. McLean v. Sale, 38 N.C. App. 520, 248 S.E.2d 372, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2230 (1978), cert. denied, 296 N.C. 585 , 254 S.E.2d 32, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1217 (1979); McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Physical Presence of Person to Be Examined Required. —

“Examine” requires that the person to be examined be physically in the presence of the qualified physician, so that the physician may actually utilize his five senses, or such of them as he deems necessary, in carrying out the mandate of this section. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

The requirement that the law-enforcement officer must take and present the person to be examined to the physician requires that the person must be physically present before the physician for the purpose of the examination. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

An intentional or negligent violation of the physician’s duty to make an examination cannot be the subject of immunity. McLean v. Sale, 38 N.C. App. 520, 248 S.E.2d 372, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2230 (1978), cert. denied, 296 N.C. 585 , 254 S.E.2d 32, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1217 (1979).

Negligence. —

Involuntary commitment statutes, including G.S. 122C-263 are designed to protect against arbitrary or ill-considered involuntary commitment and, although there may be some “generalized safety implications” in those statutes, they are not considered public safety statutes as defined by the North Carolina Supreme Court; therefore, any violation thereof cannot be considered negligence per se. Gregory v. Kilbride, 150 N.C. App. 601, 565 S.E.2d 685, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 685 (2002).

Admissibility of Evidence. —

In a case in which a patient challenged a trial court’s order recommitting him to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment, the patient unsuccessfully argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings that his condition would deteriorate and that he could likely become dangerous because, as the patient argued, his treating physician’s testimony regarding the patient’s history of violence and communication of threats was incompetent evidence because it was based on hearsay. The physician testified as an expert witness, and it was appropriate for him to base an expert opinion on both his personal examination of the patient and other information included in the patient’s official medical records, and G.S. 122C-263(d)(1)(c) required the physician to rely on the patient’s psychiatric history. In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Relief from Wrongful Certification. —

A complaint which alleged that the defendant had certified that he had examined the plaintiff pursuant to this section and recommended commitment when in fact the plaintiff had not been examined by the defendant was sufficient to state a claim for which relief could be granted for wrongful certification of the plaintiff for admission to a mental hospital. McLean v. Sale, 38 N.C. App. 520, 248 S.E.2d 372, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2230 (1978), cert. denied, 296 N.C. 585 , 254 S.E.2d 32, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1217 (1979).

A physician’s failure to perform an examination prior to signing certificate is a violation of the statute, and if plaintiff is involuntarily committed as a result of defendant’s actions, a cause of action arises against defendant, and this is true regardless of what may have prompted defendant to fail to make the examination of plaintiff. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Relevance of Reasons for Failing to Examine. —

The reasons for which defendant physician failed to make the required examination prior to signing the certificate were competent on the question of punitive damages, but not on the issue of whether defendant violated his statutory duty to plaintiff. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Denial of Gun Permit Not Warranted. —

G.S. 14-404(c)(4) did not support the denial of a gun permit application to an applicant since the G.S. 122C-261(e) , 122C-262, 122C-263, 122C-266, and 122C-268 requirements were not met, even though the applicant was taken for an involuntary psychiatric examination when the applicant was 21 years old; neither inpatient nor outpatient commitment was recommended. Waldron v. Batten, 191 N.C. App. 237, 662 S.E.2d 568, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193 (2008).

Control Over Respondent. —

While it is the finding by the physician that directly results in the restraint of the respondent, the examiner at a first examination is empowered only to make certain findings, and it is only after specific findings are made that control is exercised. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Control Over Respondent. —

Examiner has no discretion whether or not to release a respondent, but it is the statutes that dictate the result on the basis of the examiner’s findings, and the examiner is not authorized by law to deviate from those statutorily-imposed results; nor may the examiner assume control over the respondent, and thus, in short a right or duty to make a determination that may result in assuming a legal right to control is distinct from the legal right to control itself. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Sufficiency of Court Findings. —

In a case in which a trial court recommitted a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment, the patient unsuccessfully challenged the sufficiency of the findings under G.S. 122C-263(d)(1)(c) regarding whether, without treatment, his psychiatric condition would deteriorate and predictably result in dangerousness. The trial court’s written findings, coupled with the findings incorporated from a doctor’s report, were sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that, based on the patient’s psychiatric history, he was in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness. In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

No Special Relationship Imposed Liability. —

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because the nature of the duty imposed, in light of the particulars of the statutory scheme, was insufficient to impose a “special relationship” between healthcare providers and the patient; the healthcare providers had no right to control the patient at the time of the alleged breach of duty to him because it occurred prior to his admission to their care. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because healthcare providers did not have custody of or a legal right to control a patient when conducting their first examination, and thus, no special relationship was created imposing liability; the county sheriff’s department assumed custody of the patient until he was delivered to a 24-hour facility or transported to his home or the home of a consenting individual. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Custody. —

Following a first examination, custody continues with law enforcement until the respondent is transferred to a 24-hour facility for the custody and treatment of involuntary clients, or, in cases where commitment is not recommended, returned to a residence and released from custody; the legislature has not seen fit to confer custody of an involuntary commitment respondent on anyone other than law enforcement or other person properly designated prior to and during a first examination. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

No Duty to Third Parties. —

When a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding is delivered to a hospital for an initial examination to recommend whether commitment is required, neither the examiner nor the hospital obtains custody or a legal right to control the respondent unless and until involuntary commitment is recommended; neither the examiner nor the facility owes a duty to third parties for harm resulting from an examiner’s recommendation, even if the examination failed to comply with statutory requirements. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

§ 122C-263.1. Secretary’s authority to certify commitment examiners; training of certified commitment examiners performing first examinations.

  1. Physicians and eligible psychologists are qualified to perform the commitment examinations required under G.S. 122C-263 (c) and G.S. 122C-283 (c). The Secretary of Health and Human Services may individually certify to perform the first commitment examinations required by G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 other health, mental health, and substance abuse professionals whose scope of practice includes diagnosing and documenting psychiatric or substance use disorders and conducting mental status examinations to determine capacity to give informed consent to treatment as follows:
    1. The Secretary has received a request:
      1. To certify a licensed clinical social worker, a master’s or higher level degree nurse practitioner, a licensed clinical mental health counselor, a licensed marriage and family therapist, or a physician assistant to conduct the first examinations described in G.S. 122C-263(c) and G.S. 122C-283(c).
      2. To certify a master’s level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the first examination described in G.S. 122C-283(c).
    2. The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding all of the following:
      1. The request meets the requirements of this section.
      2. , c.Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 25, effective October 1, 2019. d. The Department determines that the applicant possesses the professional licensure, registration, or certification to qualify the applicant as a professional whose scope of practice includes diagnosing and documenting psychiatric or substance use disorders and conducting mental status examinations to determine capacity to give informed consent to treatment.

        e. The applicant for certification has successfully completed the Department’s standardized training program for involuntary commitment and has successfully passed the examination for that program.

    3. Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 25, effective October 1, 2019.
    4. A certification granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect for a period of up to three years and may be rescinded at any time within this period if the Secretary finds the certified individual has failed to meet the requirements of this section. Certification may be renewed every three years upon completion of a refresher training program approved by the Department.
    5. In no event shall the certification of a licensed clinical social worker, master’s or higher level degree nurse practitioner, licensed clinical mental health counsellor, a licensed marriage and family therapist, physician assistant, or master’s level certified clinical addictions specialist under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the master’s level nurse practitioner, licensed clinical mental health counselor, a licensed marriage and family therapist, physician assistant, or the master’s level certified clinical addictions specialist.
    6. The Department shall require that individuals certified to perform initial examinations under this section have successfully completed the Department’s standardized involuntary commitment training program and examination. The Department shall maintain a list of these individuals on its Internet Web site.
    7. Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 25, effective October 1, 2019.

      (7a) No less than annually, the Department shall submit a list of certified first commitment examiners to the Chief District Court Judge of each judicial district in North Carolina and maintain a current list of certified first commitment examiners on its Internet Web site.

    8. A master’s level licensed clinical addiction specialist shall only be authorized to conduct the initial examination of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-281 (a).
    9. A licensed marriage and family therapist shall not be authorized to conduct the initial examination of an individual married to a patient of the licensed marriage and family therapist.
  2. The Department shall expand its standardized certification training program to include refresher training for all certified providers performing initial examinations pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.

History. 2011-346, s. 1; 2018-33, s. 25; 2019-240, ss. 3(i), 26(h); 2020-82, s. 2(a).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 25, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 3(k), provides: “The Codifier of Rules shall make any conforming rule changes necessary to reflect the name changes made by this act.”

Session Laws 2020-82, s. 6(a), is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 25, rewrote subsection (a) and substituted “Department” for “Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services” at the beginning of subsection (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 3(i), effective January 1, 2020, substituted “clinical mental health” for “professional” preceding “counsellor” in subdivisions (a)(1)a and (a)(5).

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(h), effective November 6, 2019, deleted “LME/MCO responsibilities” following “examinations” in the section heading; in subdivision (a)(1)a, substituted “counselor” for “counsellor” and substituted “physician” for “physician’s”; and substituted “counselor” for “counsellor” in subdivision (a)(5).

Session Laws 2020-82, s. 2(a), effective October 1, 2020, added “a licensed marriage and family therapist” in sub-subdivision (a)(1)a. and twice in subdivision (a)(5); and added subdivision (a)(9).

§ 122C-263.2. Mental health crisis management: reasonable safety and containment measures.

An acute care hospital licensed under Chapter 131E, a department thereof, or other site of first examination that that uses reasonable safety or containment measures and precautions to manage the population of patients being held under appropriate supervision pending involuntary commitment placement and that does not otherwise operate as a licensable mental health facility shall not be deemed to be acting as a 24-hour facility; operating a psychiatric, substance abuse, or special care unit; offering psychiatric or substance abuse services; or acting as a licensed or unlicensed mental health facility. Actions considered to be reasonable safety or containment measures and precautions shall include the following: (i) altering rooms or removing items to prevent injury; (ii) placing patients in a consolidated location of the hospital; (iii) improvements to security and protection of staff; and (iv) any other reasonable measures that do not violate applicable law.

Reasonable safety or containment measures and precautions shall not be considered a violation of rules regulating acute care hospitals or mental health facilities. Placing patients in a consolidated location of the hospital pursuant to this subsection shall not constitute a special care unit. Nothing in this subsection relieves an acute care hospital or other site of first examination from complying with all other applicable laws or rules.

History. 2012-128, s. 1.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2012-128, s. 2, which expires on December 31, 2013, provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services shall study LME efforts and activities (i) to reduce the need for acute care inpatient admissions for patients with a primary diagnosis of a mental health disorder, developmental disability, or substance abuse disorder and (ii) to reduce the number of patients requiring three or more episodes of crisis services. For the purpose of this section, crisis services include facility-based crisis services, mobile crisis services, and emergency department services. As part of their efforts, LMEs shall ensure appropriate levels of community-based care, including assessment management, boarding, and placement of individuals during the involuntary commitment process. The Department shall report its findings to the General Assembly beginning October 1, 2012, and quarterly thereafter. This section shall expire December 31, 2013.”

§ 122C-264. Duties of clerk of superior court and the district attorney.

  1. Upon receipt of a commitment examiner’s finding that the respondent meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(1) and that outpatient commitment is recommended, the clerk of superior court of the county where the petition was initiated, upon direction of a district court judge, shall calendar the matter for hearing and shall notify the respondent, the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center, and the petitioner of the time and place of the hearing. The petitioner may file a written waiver of his right to notice under this subsection with the clerk of court.
  2. Upon receipt by the clerk of superior court pursuant to G.S. 122C-266(c) of a commitment examiner’s finding that a respondent meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) and that inpatient commitment is recommended, the clerk of superior court of the county where the 24-hour facility is located shall, after determination required by G.S. 122C-261(c) and upon direction of a district court judge, assign counsel if necessary, calendar the matter for hearing, and notify the respondent, his counsel, and the petitioner of the time and place of the hearing. The petitioner or respondent, directly or through counsel, may file a written waiver of the right to notice under this subsection with the clerk of court. (b1) Upon receipt of a commitment examiner’s certificate that a respondent meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) and that immediate hospitalization is needed pursuant to G.S. 122C-262 , the clerk of superior court of the county where the treatment facility is located shall submit the certificate to the Chief District Court Judge. The court shall review the certificate within 24 hours, excluding Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, for a finding of reasonable grounds in accordance with [G.S.] 122C-261(b). The clerk shall notify the treatment facility of the court’s findings by telephone and shall proceed as set forth in subsections (b), (c), and (f) of this section.
  3. Notice to the respondent, required by subsections (a) and (b) of this section, shall be given as provided in G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4(j) at least 72 hours before the hearing. Notice to other individuals shall be sent at least 72 hours before the hearing by first-class mail postage prepaid to the individual’s last known address. G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 6 shall not apply.
  4. In cases described in G.S. 122C-266(b) in addition to notice required in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the clerk of superior court shall notify the chief district judge and the district attorney in the county in which the defendant was found incapable of proceeding. The notice shall be given in the same way as the notice required by subsection (c) of this section. The judge or the district attorney may file a written waiver of his right to notice under this subsection with the clerk of court. (d1) For hearings and rehearings pursuant to G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 , the clerk of superior court shall calendar the hearing or rehearing and shall notify the respondent, his counsel, counsel for the State, and the district attorney involved in the original trial. The notice shall be given in the same manner as the notice required by subsection (c) of this section. Upon receipt of the notice, the district attorney shall notify any persons he deems appropriate, including anyone who has filed with his office a written request for notification of any hearing or rehearing concerning discharge or conditional release of a respondent. Notice sent by the district attorney shall be by first-class mail to the person’s last known address.
  5. Repealed by Session Laws 2017-158, s. 21, effective July 21, 2017.
  6. The clerk of superior court of the county where inpatient commitment hearings and rehearings are held shall provide all notices, send all records and maintain a record of all proceedings as required by this Part; provided that if the respondent has been committed to a 24-hour facility in a county other than his county of residence and the district court hearing is held in the county of the facility, the clerk of superior court in the county of the facility shall forward the record of the proceedings to the clerk of superior court in the county of respondent’s residence, where they shall be maintained by receiving clerk.

History. 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 5; c. 414, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, s. 5; 1983, c. 380, s. 9; c. 638, ss. 8, 16; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 7; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 19; 1987, c. 596, s. 2; 1991, c. 37, s. 4; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 9; 2017-158, s. 21; 2018-33, s. 26.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 26, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-158, s. 21, effective July 21, 2017, deleted former subsection (e) which read: “The clerk of superior court of the county where outpatient commitment is to be supervised shall keep a separate list regarding outpatient commitment and shall prepare quarterly reports listing all active cases, the assigned supervisor, and the disposition of all hearings, supplemental hearings, and rehearings.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 26, substituted “commitment examiner’s” for “physician’s or eligible psychologist’s” throughout the section; in subsection (b), in the first sentence, inserted “by the clerk of superior court pursuant to G.S. 122C-266(c),” and, in the last sentence, inserted “or respondent, directly or through counsel,” and substituted “the right” for “his right.” For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality of Former Section. —

Former G.S. 122-58.5 stated that at the minimum the notice should be served 48 hours in advance of the hearing. This time period was constitutionally adequate to allow for sufficient preparation, especially in light of the fact that continuances could be granted, which would prevent any prejudice because of insufficient time to prepare. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

Former G.S. 122-58.5 used the terms “notify” and “notice.” There could be little doubt that these terms were used to carry the full panoply of due process notice mandated by the law of the land. When the legislature uses the term “notice” it means such notice as is required by due process and, therefore, former G.S. 122-58.5 was constitutional on its face. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

In light of the nature of the proceedings, the procedure in former G.S. 122-58.5 was reasonably calculated to inform the respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding of the nature and purpose of the hearing and, therefore, was not constitutionally infirm. There is no constitutional mandate to notify the respondent of the burden of proof or to serve upon him a list of witnesses and the substance of their proposed testimony. Such is not even required in a criminal proceeding. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittee. —

Because the plain language of the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-264(d1), requires that notice of G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 hearings be given to anyone who has requested notice of a hearing concerning discharge or conditional release, the statute recognizes that hearings under G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 are hearings that may involve a conditional release; construing G.S. 122C-268.1, G.S. 122C-276.1, and G.S. 122C-277 in pari materia, it is reasonable to read these statutes as providing the same dispositional alternatives, recommitment, discharge, or conditional release, regardless whether the hearing was initiated by a respondent’s treating physician or whether it was automatically calendared pursuant to a statutory mandate, and if a trial court may order a conditional release when requested by a treating physician, then the trial court itself has commensurate authority under G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release in an automatically calendared proceeding. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

§ 122C-265. Outpatient commitment; examination and treatment pending hearing.

  1. If a respondent, who has been recommended for outpatient commitment by [a] commitment examiner different from the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center, fails to appear for examination by the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center at the designated time, the physician or center shall notify the clerk of superior court who shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody and take him immediately to the outpatient treatment physician or center for evaluation. The custody order is valid throughout the State. The law-enforcement officer may wait during the examination and return the respondent to his home after the examination.
  2. The examining commitment examiner or the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center may prescribe to the respondent reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment that are consistent with accepted medical standards pending the district court hearing.
  3. In no event may a respondent released on a recommendation that he or she meets the outpatient commitment criteria be physically forced to take medication or forcibly detained for treatment pending a district court hearing.
  4. If at any time pending the district court hearing the outpatient treatment physician or center determines that the respondent does not meet the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), the physician shall release the respondent and notify the clerk of court and the proceedings shall be terminated.
  5. If a respondent becomes dangerous to self as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b., pending a district court hearing on outpatient commitment, new proceedings for involuntary inpatient commitment may be initiated.
  6. If an inpatient commitment proceeding is initiated pending the hearing for outpatient commitment and the respondent is admitted to a 24-hour facility to be held for an inpatient commitment hearing, notice shall be sent by the clerk of court in the county where the respondent is being held to the clerk of court of the county where the outpatient commitment was initiated and the outpatient commitment proceeding shall be terminated.

History. 1983, c. 638, s. 11; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 6; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 5; 1991, c. 636, s. 2(2); c. 761, s. 49; 2004-23, s. 2(a); 2018-33, s. 27.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 27, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-23, s. 2(a), effective June 25, 2004, inserted the second sentence in subsection (a).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 27, in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “commitment examiner” for “an examining physician or eligible psychologist” and deleted “or other person authorized under G.S. 122C-251 ” preceding “to take the respondent”; in subsection (b), substituted “commitment examiner” for “physician”; and made minor stylistic, gender neutral, and punctuation changes. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-266. Inpatient commitment; second examination and treatment pending hearing.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (b) and (e), within 24 hours of arrival at a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 , the respondent shall be examined by a physician. This physician shall not be the same physician who completed the certificate or examination under the provisions of G.S. 122C-262 or G.S. 122C-263 . The examination shall include but is not limited to the assessment specified in G.S. 122C-263 (c).
    1. If the physician finds that the respondent is mentally ill and is dangerous to self, as defined by G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or others, as defined by G.S. 122C-3(11) b., the physician shall hold the respondent at the facility pending the district court hearing.
    2. If the physician finds that the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment under G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), the physician shall show these findings on the physician’s examination report, release the respondent pending the district court hearing, and notify the clerk of superior court of the county where the petition was initiated of these findings. In addition, the examining physician shall show on the examination report the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center. The physician shall give the respondent a written notice listing the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center and directing the respondent to appear at that address at a specified date and time. The examining physician before the appointment shall notify by telephone and shall send a copy of the notice and the examination report to the proposed outpatient treatment physician or center.
    3. If the physician finds that the respondent does not meet the criteria for commitment under either G.S. 122C-263(d)(1) or G.S. 122C-263(d)(2), the physician shall release the respondent and the proceedings shall be terminated.
    4. If the respondent is released under subdivisions (2) or (3) of this subsection, the law enforcement officer or other person designated to provide transportation shall return the respondent to the respondent’s residence in the originating county or, if requested by the respondent, to another location in the originating county. (a1) The second examination of a respondent required by subsection (a) of this section to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to mental illness may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of a physician or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures, provided that the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth is satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the examining physician. An examining physician who is not so satisfied shall note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent shall be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a physician. As used in this section, “telehealth” means the use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other.
  2. If the custody order states that the respondent was charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving assault with a deadly weapon, and that he was found incapable of proceeding, the physician shall examine him as set forth in subsection (a) of this section. However, the physician may not release him from the facility until ordered to do so following the district court hearing.
  3. The findings of the physician and the facts on which they are based shall be in writing, in all cases. A copy of the findings shall be sent to the clerk of superior court by reliable and expeditious means.
  4. Pending the district court hearing, the physician attending the respondent may administer to the respondent reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment that is consistent with accepted medical standards. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, if at any time pending the district court hearing, the attending physician determines that the respondent no longer meets the criteria of either G.S. 122C-263(d)(1) or (d)(2), he shall release the respondent and notify the clerk of court and the proceedings shall be terminated.
  5. If the 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 or G.S. 122C-262 is the facility in which the first examination by a physician or eligible psychologist occurred and is the same facility in which the respondent is held, the second examination shall occur not later than the following regular working day.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 6; 1979, c. 915, s. 6; 1983, c. 380, s. 5; c. 638, ss. 9, 10; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 1987, c. 596, s. 4; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 6; 1991, c. 37, s. 9; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 10(a), (b); 2021-77, s. 6(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3A.1(a), provides: “Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply in this Part:

“(1) CDC. — The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“(2) COVID-19. — Coronavirus disease 2019.

“(3) COVID-19 diagnostic test. — A test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to detect the presence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

“(4) COVID-19 emergency. — The period beginning March 10, 2020, and ending on the date the Governor signs an executive order rescinding Executive Order No. 116, Declaration of a State of Emergency to Coordinate Response and Protective Actions to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19.

“(5) COVID-19 antibody test. — A serological blood test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to measure the amount of antibodies or proteins present in the blood when the body is responding to an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3F.1(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The following words have the following meanings in this section:

“(1) Commitment examiner. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(2) Telehealth. — The use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other.

“(3) Qualified professional. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(b) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the first examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-283 (a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of the commitment examiner or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. A commitment examiner who examines a respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-283 (d) would not be different if the examination had been conducted in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. A commitment examiner who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a person authorized to perform examinations under G.S. 122C-283.

“(c) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the second examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-266(a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to mental illness or required by G.S. 122C-285(a) to determine if the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of a physician or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures, provided that the following conditions are met:

“(1) In the case of involuntary commitment due to mental illness, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(3) of G.S. 122C-266 would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the examining physician. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a physician.

“(2) In the case of involuntary commitment due to substance use disorder, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-285(a) would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a qualified professional, as defined in G.S. 122C-3 ; provided that, if the initial commitment examination was performed by a qualified professional, then this face-to-face examination shall be in the presence of a physician.

“(d) This section is effective when it becomes law and expires 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 6(b), effective July 2, 2021, added subsection (a1).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

CASE NOTES

Effect of G.S. 8-53 . —

For discussion of former statutory provisions making it manifest that the physician’s role in involuntary commitment proceedings was not intended to be inhibited by G.S. 8-53 , see In re Farrow, 41 N.C. App. 680, 255 S.E.2d 777, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2728 (1979).

“Within 24 hours of Arrival” — Applicability. —

The words “within 24 hours of arrival” demonstrate the applicability of that provision to the initial commitment phase. It would not make sense to apply that provision to the circumstances of a rehearing at which time there is no longer a question of whether the initial commitment had been proper. In re Lowery, 110 N.C. App. 67, 428 S.E.2d 861, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 405 (1993).

Second Examination — Purpose. —

The purpose of the second examination is to protect the rights of a respondent who has been taken to a medical facility immediately prior thereto to insure that he was properly committed. In re Lowery, 110 N.C. App. 67, 428 S.E.2d 861, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 405 (1993).

Proof Sufficient for Finding of “Dangerous to Self.” —

The doctor’s findings on the examination report and testimony at the involuntary commitment hearing were sufficient proof that appellant fit the category of one who was “dangerous to self.” In re Woodie, 116 N.C. App. 425, 448 S.E.2d 142, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 1045 (1994).

Denial of Gun Permit Not Warranted. —

G.S. 14-404(c)(4) did not support the denial of a gun permit application to an applicant since the G.S. 122C-261(e) , 122C-262, 122C-263, 122C-266, and 122C-268 requirements were not met, even though the applicant was taken for an involuntary psychiatric examination when the applicant was 21 years old; neither inpatient nor outpatient commitment was recommended. Waldron v. Batten, 191 N.C. App. 237, 662 S.E.2d 568, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193 (2008).

Preservation for Review. —

Because a patient did not raise the issue of a violation of subsection (a) before the district court, she failed to preserve the issue for appellate review; the court of appeals improperly vacated the patient’s involuntary commitment order because it erred in holding that subsection (a) imposed a statutory mandate that automatically preserves a violation of that provision for appellate review. In re E.D., 372 N.C. 111 , 827 S.E.2d 450, 2019 N.C. LEXIS 377 (2019).

Subsection (a) does not require a specific act by a trial judge and does not place any responsibility on a presiding judge, but instead, the provision requires that a physician perform an examination at a designated “state facility”; therefore, subsection (a) does not fit within either category of statutory mandates that would automatically preserve an issue for appellate review. In re E.D., 372 N.C. 111 , 827 S.E.2d 450, 2019 N.C. LEXIS 377 (2019).

§ 122C-267. Outpatient commitment; district court hearing.

  1. A hearing shall be held in district court within 10 days of the day the respondent is taken into custody pursuant to G.S. 122C-261(e) . Upon its own motion or upon motion of the proposed outpatient treatment physician or the respondent, the court may grant a continuance of not more than five days.
  2. The respondent shall be present at the hearing. A subpoena may be issued to compel the respondent’s presence at a hearing. The petitioner and the proposed outpatient treatment physician or his designee may be present and may provide testimony.
  3. Certified copies of reports and findings of commitment examiners and medical records of previous and current treatment are admissible in evidence.
  4. At the hearing to determine the necessity and appropriateness of outpatient commitment, the respondent need not, but may, be represented by counsel. However, if the court determines that the legal or factual issues raised are of such complexity that the assistance of counsel is necessary for an adequate presentation of the merits or that the respondent is unable to speak for himself, the court may continue the case for not more than five days and order the appointment of counsel for an indigent respondent. Appointment of counsel shall be in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  5. Hearings may be held at the area facility in which the respondent is being treated, if it is located within the judge’s district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 , or in the judge’s chambers. A hearing may not be held in a regular courtroom, over objection of the respondent, if in the discretion of a judge a more suitable place is available.
  6. The hearing shall be closed to the public unless the respondent requests otherwise.
  7. A copy of all documents admitted into evidence and a transcript of the proceedings shall be furnished to the respondent on request by the clerk upon the direction of a district court judge. If the client is indigent, the copies shall be provided at State expense.
  8. To support an outpatient commitment order, the court is required to find by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1). The court shall record the facts which support its findings and shall show on the order the center or physician who is responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1975, cc. 322, 459; 1977, c. 400, s. 7; c. 1126, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, ss. 7, 13; 1983, c. 380, s. 6; c. 638, ss. 12, 13; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 8; 1987, c. 282, s. 18; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 113.1; 2000-144, s. 38; 2018-33, s. 28.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (c) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 28, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 28, substituted “commitment examiners” for “physicians and psychologists” in subsection (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Most of the cases below were decided under former statutory provisions.

The 10-day custody period prior to a full adversary hearing does not constitute a denial of due process. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

The failure to provide a jury trial in involuntary commitment proceedings does not violate the equal protection clause. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

A standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is not mandated by the due process clause, and the North Carolina legislature’s choice of proof by clear, cogent and convincing evidence does not violate that constitutional prohibition. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

Self-Incrimination. —

To apply the privilege against self-incrimination to proceedings under former similar provisions would be to destroy the valid purposes which they serve, as it would make them unworkable and ineffective. French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 443 U.S. 901, 99 S. Ct. 3091, 61 L. Ed. 2d 869, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2401 (1979).

Failure to Afford Right of Cross-Examination. —

Where the record showed that examining physician’s affidavit formed the basis of order of commitment, and respondent was not afforded the right, guaranteed by statute, to cross-examine the physician, the evidence was not sufficient to support the findings required and to support commitment. In re Benton, 26 N.C. App. 294, 215 S.E.2d 792, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2028 (1975).

Assuming, without conceding, that a physician’s brief statement and conclusion as to the imminent danger of the respondent would support a recommitment order, his failure to appear at the hearing deprived the respondent of his right of confrontation and cross-examination. In re Mackie, 36 N.C. App. 638, 244 S.E.2d 450, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2569 (1978).

Effect of G.S. 8-53 . —

For discussion of former statutory provisions making it manifest that the physician’s role in involuntary commitment proceedings was not intended to be inhibited by G.S. 8-53 , see In re Farrow, 41 N.C. App. 680, 255 S.E.2d 777, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2728 (1979).

Findings Prerequisite to Commitment. —

Statutory mandate under former statutory provisions required as a condition to a valid commitment order that the district court find two distinct facts: first, that the respondent was mentally ill or inebriate, and second, that the respondent was dangerous to himself or others. In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E.2d 409, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2283 (1975); In re Hogan, 32 N.C. App. 429, 232 S.E.2d 492, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1965 (1977); In re Bartley, 40 N.C. App. 218, 252 S.E.2d 553, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2608 (1979).

In a case in which a trial court recommitted a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment, the patient unsuccessfully challenged the sufficiency of the findings under G.S. 122C-263(d)(1)(c) regarding whether, without treatment, his psychiatric condition would deteriorate and predictably result in dangerousness. The trial court’s written findings, coupled with the findings incorporated from a doctor’s report, were sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that, based on the patient’s psychiatric history, he was in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness. In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Facts Must Be Found and Recorded. —

The two distinct ultimate facts of (1) mental illness or inebriacy and (2) danger under former statutory provisions had to be supported by facts which were found from the evidence and recorded by the district court. In re Williamson, 36 N.C. App. 362, 244 S.E.2d 189, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483 (1978).

Recording of Findings Mandatory. —

The direction to the court under former G.S. 122-58.7(i) to record the facts which supported its findings was mandatory. In re Koyi, 34 N.C. App. 320, 238 S.E.2d 153, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1668 (1977); In re Jacobs, 38 N.C. App. 573, 248 S.E.2d 448, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2243 (1978); In re Bartley, 40 N.C. App. 218, 252 S.E.2d 553, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2608 (1979); In re Caver, 40 N.C. App. 264, 252 S.E.2d 284, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2618 (1979).

No Requirement That Findings Be Based Solely on Medical Evidence. —

The involuntary commitment statutes do not require that an order of commitment may issue only when the requisite factual findings are supported by competent medical evidence. All that is required is that the court make the essential findings from “clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.” In re Underwood, 38 N.C. App. 344, 247 S.E.2d 778, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2179 (1978).

No Overt Act Required. —

An overt act may be clear, cogent and convincing evidence which will support a finding of danger, but it is not necessary that there be an overt act to establish dangerousness. In re Salem, 31 N.C. App. 57, 228 S.E.2d 649, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 1902 (1976).

Threats as Evidence of Dangerousness. —

The fundamental differences between a criminal charge based entirely on threats and an involuntary commitment in which threats merely serve as some evidence of the dangerousness of the person weigh against the use of such strict standards in the latter case. In re Williamson, 36 N.C. App. 362, 244 S.E.2d 189, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483 (1978).

Inadequate Evidence for Findings. —

The finding that respondent was “preoccupied with religious subjects” hardly furnished support for an ultimate finding either that she was mentally ill or that she was imminently dangerous to herself or others. In re Hogan, 32 N.C. App. 429, 232 S.E.2d 492, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1965 (1977).

Where doctor testified only that the respondent was unable to care for herself and that she was a complete nursing care problem, there was no showing that the respondent was dangerous to herself and the requirements for involuntary commitment were not met. In re Doty, 38 N.C. App. 233, 247 S.E.2d 628, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2136 (1978).

For other instances in which the State failed to present clear, cogent and convincing evidence of imminent danger, see In re Salem, 31 N.C. App. 57, 228 S.E.2d 649, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 1902 (1976); In re Hatley, 291 N.C. 693 , 231 S.E.2d 633, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1235 (1977).

Burden of Proof on State. —

Subsection (a) of former G.S. 122-58.7 indicated a conscious legislative decision to place the burden on the State to come forward with evidence to justify the commitment within 10 days. In re Jacobs, 38 N.C. App. 573, 248 S.E.2d 448, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2243 (1978).

Questions of Fact. —

Whether a person is mentally ill or inebriate, and whether he is dangerous to himself or others, present questions of fact. In re Hogan, 32 N.C. App. 429, 232 S.E.2d 492, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1965 (1977).

It is for the trier of fact to determine whether evidence offered in a particular case is clear, cogent, and convincing. In re Underwood, 38 N.C. App. 344, 247 S.E.2d 778, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2179 (1978).

Standards on Review. —

On appeal from an order of commitment, the questions for determination in the Court of Appeals become (1) whether the court’s ultimate findings are indeed supported by the “facts” which the court recorded in its order as supporting its findings, and (2) whether in any event there was competent evidence to support the court’s findings. In re Hogan, 32 N.C. App. 429, 232 S.E.2d 492, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1965 (1977).

Time for Hearing When Tenth Day Falls on Sunday. —

Where the tenth day following the day the respondent was taken into custody was a Sunday, the hearing called for the following Monday was in apt time. In re Underwood, 38 N.C. App. 344, 247 S.E.2d 778, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2179 (1978).

Denial of Right to Hearing Within 10 Days. —

Where the trial court continued the respondent’s hearing, over objection, for seven days, and the State failed at the originally scheduled hearing to offer any evidence or to come forward with even a copy of the magistrate’s order of commitment or the petition for involuntary commitment, the result was that respondent was denied his right to a hearing before the district court within 10 days of confinement. In re Jacobs, 38 N.C. App. 573, 248 S.E.2d 448, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2243 (1978).

§ 122C-268. Inpatient commitment; district court hearing.

  1. A hearing shall be held in district court within 10 days of the day the respondent is taken into law enforcement custody pursuant to G.S. 122C-261(e) or G.S. 122C-262 . If a respondent temporarily detained under G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) is subject to a series of successive custody orders issued pursuant to G.S. 122C-263(d)(2), the hearing shall be held within 10 days after the day that the respondent is taken into custody under the most recent custody order. A continuance of not more than five days may be granted upon motion of any of the following:
    1. The court.
    2. Respondent’s counsel.
    3. The State, sufficiently in advance to avoid movement of the respondent.
  2. The attorney, who is a member of the staff of the Attorney General assigned to one of the State’s facilities for the mentally ill or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill, shall represent the State’s interest at commitment hearings, rehearings, and supplemental hearings held for respondents admitted pursuant to this Part or G.S. 15A-1321 at the facility to which he is assigned.In addition, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, designate an attorney who is a member of his staff to represent the State’s interest at any commitment hearing, rehearing, or supplemental hearing held in a place other than at one of the State’s facilities for the mentally ill or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.
  3. If the respondent’s custody order indicates that he was charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and that he was found incapable of proceeding, the clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the hearing as provided in G.S. 122C-264(d). The district attorney in the county in which the respondent was found incapable of proceeding may represent the State’s interest at the hearing.
  4. The respondent shall be represented by counsel of his choice; or if he is indigent within the meaning of G.S. 7A-450 or refuses to retain counsel if financially able to do so, he shall be represented by counsel appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  5. With the consent of the court, counsel may in writing waive the presence of the respondent.
  6. Certified copies of reports and findings of commitment examiners and previous and current medical records are admissible in evidence, but the respondent’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses may not be denied.
  7. To the extent feasible, hearings shall be held in an appropriate room at the facility in which the respondent is being treated in a manner approved by the chief district court judge if the facility is located within the presiding judge’s district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 . Hearings may be held in the judge’s chambers. A hearing may not be held in a regular courtroom, over objection of the respondent, if in the discretion of a judge a more suitable place is available. Regardless of the manner and location for hearings, hearings shall be held in a manner that complies with any applicable federal and State laws governing the confidentiality and security of confidential information. If the respondent has counsel, the respondent shall be allowed to communicate fully and confidentially with his attorney during the proceeding.
  8. The hearing shall be closed to the public unless the respondent requests otherwise.
  9. A copy of all documents admitted into evidence and a transcript of the proceedings shall be furnished to the respondent on request by the clerk upon the direction of a district court judge. If the respondent is indigent, the copies shall be provided at State expense.
  10. To support an inpatient commitment order, the court shall find by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or dangerous to others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b. The court shall record the facts that support its findings.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 8; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 1014, s. 195(b); 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 114; 1989, c. 141, s. 11; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 7; 1991, c. 37, s. 10; c. 257, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 11(a), (b); 2000-144, s. 39; 2014-107, s. 6.1; 2017-158, s. 16; 2018-33, s. 29; 2021-47, s. 10(l).

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsections (a), (f), and (g) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 29, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2021-47, s. 10(m), made the rewriting of subsection (g) of this section by Session Laws 2021-47, s. 10( l ), effective June 18, 2021, and applicable to proceedings occurring on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2014-107, s. 6.1, effective August 6, 2014, inserted “by interactive videoconferencing between a treatment facility and a courtroom” in the first sentence of subsection (g).

Session Laws 2017-158, s. 16, effective July 21, 2017, in subsection (g), substituted “audio and video transmission” for “interactive videoconferencing” and inserted in which the judge and the respondent can see and hear each other” in the first sentence, and added the third and fourth sentences.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 29, in subsection (a), added the present second sentence, and in the third sentence, added “any of the following” and made minor punctuation changes; in subsection (f), substituted “commitment examiners” for “physicians and psychologists”; and rewrote subsection (g). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-47, s. 10( l ), rewrote subsection (g). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1980 law on civil procedure, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1049 (1981).

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

For comment, “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Indefinite Confinement and the Unconstitutional Treatment of North Carolinians with Mental Retardation,” see 35 Campbell L. Rev. 257 (2013).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Most of the cases below were decided under former statutory provisions.

The 10-day custody period prior to a full adversary hearing does not constitute a denial of due process. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

Mandatory Protections. —

Protections afforded by G.S. 15A-1242 and G.S. 122C-268(d) and Office of Indigent Defense Services Rule 1.6 are mandatory in involuntary commitment proceedings; rationale from the criminal cases interpreting the waiver of the right to counsel in criminal cases also applies to cases of involuntary commitment. In re Watson, 209 N.C. App. 507, 706 S.E.2d 296, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 212 (2011).

Findings Prerequisite to Commitment. —

Statutory mandate requires as a condition to a valid commitment order that the district court find two distinct facts: first, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and second, that the respondent is dangerous to himself or others. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980); In re Collins, 49 N.C. App. 243, 271 S.E.2d 72, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3374 (1980).

Trial court erred in involuntarily committing the respondent because, while the trial court’s findings reflected the respondent’s mental illness, there was no finding of the respondent suffering serious physical debilitation within the near future unless adequate treatment was given or that there was a reasonable probability of suicide unless adequate treatment was given. In re J.P.S., 264 N.C. App. 58, 823 S.E.2d 917, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 158 (2019).

Trial court must find three elements present in order to find that respondent is dangerous to others: (1) within the recent past (2) respondent has (a) inflicted serious bodily harm on another, or (b) attempted to inflict serious bodily harm on another, or (c) threatened to inflict serious bodily harm on another, or (d) has acted in such a manner as to create a substantial risk of serious bodily harm to another, and (3) there is a reasonable probability that such conduct will be repeated. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

No Overt Act Required. —

The present statutory definition of “dangerous to others” does not require a finding of overt acts. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

Waiver of Right to Counsel. —

Trial court’s failure to comply with G.S. 15A-1242 and G.S. 122C-268(d) and Office of Indigent Defense Services Rule 1.6 made respondent’s waiver of counsel ineffective as: (1) trial court did not make sure respondent was acting with full awareness of respondent’s rights, or consider respondent’s age, education, mental condition, or the complexity of the proceeding; (2) trial court had evidence before it that respondent was mentally ill, and committed respondent involuntarily; and (3) trial court deferred to respondent’s counsel to provide respondent with constitutional safeguards. In re Watson, 209 N.C. App. 507, 706 S.E.2d 296, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 212 (2011).

It is for the trier of fact to determine whether evidence offered in a particular case is clear, cogent, and convincing. In re Monroe, 49 N.C. App. 23, 270 S.E.2d 537, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3359 (1980).

The Court of Appeals does not consider whether the evidence of respondent’s mental illness and dangerousness was clear, cogent and convincing. It is for the trier of fact to determine whether the competent evidence offered in a particular case met the burden of proof. In re Collins, 49 N.C. App. 243, 271 S.E.2d 72, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3374 (1980).

The trier of fact alone must determine whether the evidence presented is clear, cogent and convincing. A court’s only function on appeal is to determine whether there was any competent evidence to support the factual findings made. In re Medlin, 59 N.C. App. 33, 295 S.E.2d 604, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 2855 (1982).

It is not the court’s function on appeal to determine if the evidence offered meets the statutory standard but simply to determine whether there was any competent evidence to support the factual findings made. In re Jackson, 60 N.C. App. 581, 299 S.E.2d 677, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2504 (1983).

In its order the trial court must record the facts upon which its ultimate findings are based. In re Collins, 49 N.C. App. 243, 271 S.E.2d 72, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3374 (1980); In re Crainshaw, 54 N.C. App. 429, 283 S.E.2d 553, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2844 (1981).

Order of commitment was not void on its face where the court recorded the facts by placing “x’s” by the recorded facts on the order of commitment form. In re Crouse, 65 N.C. App. 696, 309 S.E.2d 568, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 3541 (1983).

Denial of Gun Permit Not Warranted. —

G.S. 14-404(c)(4) did not support the denial of a gun permit application to an applicant since the G.S. 122C-261(e) , 122C-262, 122C-263, 122C-266, and 122C-268 requirements were not met, even though the applicant was taken for an involuntary psychiatric examination when the applicant was 21 years old; neither inpatient nor outpatient commitment was recommended. Waldron v. Batten, 191 N.C. App. 237, 662 S.E.2d 568, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1193 (2008).

Findings Sufficient to Support Commitment Order. —

Respondent was dangerous to himself where the evidence showed that he was unable without constant professional 24 hour supervision and medical treatment to satisfy his needs for personal or medical care, self-protection, and safety, he was grossly delusional, paranoid, and manic, he was likely to suffer debilitation without treatment, his loss of touch with reality made it difficult for him to exercise judgment in the conduct of his daily affairs, and he was at risk of harm outside the medical facility. Thus, there was a reasonable probability that he would suffer imminent harm absent commitment. In re B.S., 270 N.C. App. 414, 840 S.E.2d 308, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 200 (2020).

Trial court did not err in entering an involuntary commitment order because it properly found that a patient was a danger to himself; the trial court’s finding the patient’s ACT team was unable to sufficiently care for his dental and nourishment needs created the nexus between his mental illness and future harm to himself, and the trial court heard evidence of actions the patient was unable to control and of his severely impaired insight as to his own condition. In re C.G., 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (July 20, 2021).

Trial court did not err in entering an involuntary commitment order because it properly found that a patient was a danger to himself; the trial court’s finding the patient’s ACT team was unable to sufficiently care for his dental and nourishment needs created the nexus between his mental illness and future harm to himself, and the trial court heard evidence of actions the patient was unable to control and of his severely impaired insight as to his own condition. In re C.G., 2021-NCCOA-344, 278 N.C. App. 416, 863 S.E.2d 237, 2021- NCCOA-344, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (2021).

There was sufficient evidence to find that respondent was dangerous to himself under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 122C-268(j) based on a psychiatrist’s testimony, as respondent did not object to the psychiatrist’s testimony on the basis of hearsay and the psychiatrist was testifying as an expert and as such could base his opinion on respondent’s medical records, speaking with respondent’s parents, and reviewing a police report from an incident where respondent walked in the middle of a road. In re A.J.d, 2022-NCCOA-258, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 274 (April 19, 2022).

Findings Insufficient to Support Commitment Order. —

Involuntary commitment order was error because the order contained insufficient findings, as specifically required by G.S. 122C-268(j), to support the trial court’s determination that the patient was dangerous to himself and to others; statements in a physician’s report, incorporated by the order, that the patient was a 56-year-old white male, with a history of alcohol abuse/dependence, admitted with manic episode, and who continued to be symptomatic with limited insight regarding his illness, were not sufficient to support the trial court’s findings. In re Booker, 193 N.C. App. 433, 667 S.E.2d 302, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1808 (2008).

Trial court erred in committing respondent to involuntary inpatient commitment because the trial court simply checking a box on its locally modified involuntary commitment form indicating respondent met the requirements for further inpatient treatment was insufficient and the trial court failed to make any findings of fact as required by G.S. 122C-268(j). In re Allison, 216 N.C. App. 297, 715 S.E.2d 912, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2149 (2011).

Involuntary commitment of an individual under G.S. 122C-268(j) was improper because, even assuming that the trial court successfully incorporated the contents of the report by the individual’s doctor into its order, the order was insufficient to support the involuntary commitment because (1) the trial court’s findings reflected the individual’s mental illness, but they did not indicate that the individual’s illness or any of the individual’s symptoms would persist and endanger the individual within the near future pursuant to G.S. 122C-3(11)(a)(1) ; and (2) the trial court’s findings were insufficient to support its conclusion that the individual was dangerous to others pursuant to G.S. 122C-3(11)(b). In re Whatley, 224 N.C. App. 267, 736 S.E.2d 527, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1464 (2012).

Trial court erred in ordering the involuntary commitment of the respondent because the evidence in the record on appeal was insufficient to satisfy the statutory criteria where there was no evidence that the respondent’s refusal to take his medication created a serious health risk in the near future, an expert’s only testimony concerning the respondent’s “nourishment” was that he lost some “unknown amount” of weight, but that his current weight was safe, and the respondent’s threat to sue his guardian and his alleged aggressive, but non-violent, actions toward the hospital staff could not be viewed as a threat to inflict “serious bodily harm.” In re W.R.D., 248 N.C. App. 512, 790 S.E.2d 344, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 806 (2016).

In its involuntary commitment order, the trial court’s findings of fact were not sufficient because, even though the order incorporated the psychologist’s report, it did not address conflicts in the evidence or resolve questions of credibility. The trial court’s findings did not address the hospital’s witness’s testimony at all and did not resolve any conflicts in the evidence presented by respondent’s testimony. Respondent testified that she had lived alone for 20 years, was able to care for herself, and that her daughter, who worked at the hospital where she was involuntarily committed, was working together with the hospital personnel to “permanently put her somewhere”. In re J.C.D., 265 N.C. App. 441, 828 S.E.2d 186, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 483 (2019).

Respondent’s involuntary commitment was erroneous as the findings of fact did not support the trial court’s conclusion that she was dangerous to herself because a physician’s testimony showed that, as of the hearing date, respondent was stabilized, medicated, and not suffering from any acute symptoms; although she had been a danger to herself in the past, that history alone could not support a finding that she would be a danger to herself in the future; her four psychiatric stays within the past two years and her schizophrenia did not support the conclusion she would be a danger to herself within the near future; and there was no evidence that her refusal to take her medication created a serious health risk in the near future. In re N.U., 270 N.C. App. 427, 840 S.E.2d 296, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 197 (2020).

Alternative to Actual Transcript Provided Meaningful Review. —

Patient was not deprived of the opportunity for meaningful appellate review of the patient’s involuntary commitment hearing because the patient could not show prejudice by the absence of an actual transcript of the hearing as the patient was able to obtain an adequate alternative through a memorandum provided by the judge which gave a detailed account of the testimony offered at the hearing that was supplemented by the handwritten notes of the patient’s counsel and the summary of the State of North Carolina’s counsel concerning the hearing. In re Derrick Woodard, 249 N.C. App. 64, 791 S.E.2d 109, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 866 (2016).

Right to Impartial Tribunal Not Violated. —

Trial court did not violate a patient’s right to an impartial tribunal because it only elicited evidence that would otherwise be overlooked as no counsel for the State was present; because the court of appeals had previously upheld involuntary commitments where the State has not appeared and where the trial court has questioned witnesses and elicited evidence, it was bound by its prior precedent to conclude the same. In re C.G., 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (July 20, 2021).

Trial court did not violate a patient’s right to an impartial tribunal because it only elicited evidence that would otherwise be overlooked as no counsel for the State was present; because the court of appeals had previously upheld involuntary commitments where the State has not appeared and where the trial court has questioned witnesses and elicited evidence, it was bound by its prior precedent to conclude the same. In re C.G., 2021-NCCOA-344, 278 N.C. App. 416, 863 S.E.2d 237, 2021- NCCOA-344, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (2021).

Standards on Review. —

On appeal from an order of commitment, the questions for determination in the Court of Appeals become (1) whether the Court’s ultimate findings are indeed supported by the “facts” which the Court recorded in its order as supporting its findings, and (2) whether in any event there was competent evidence to support the Court’s findings. In re Frick, 49 N.C. App. 273, 271 S.E.2d 84, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3380 (1980).

On appeal of a commitment order, the function of the Court of Appeals is to determine whether there was any competent evidence to support the facts recorded in the commitment order and whether the trial court’s ultimate findings of mental illness and dangerous to self or others were supported by the facts recorded in the order. In re Collins, 49 N.C. App. 243, 271 S.E.2d 72, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3374 (1980).

Appellate court applied the same standard it used in reviewing a trial court’s order committing a defendant to a mental hospital to defendant’s appeal from a trial court’s order recommitting him to a mental hospital; the record supported the trial court’s judgment that defendant who was acquitted of multiple homicides by reason of insanity should not be released because he did not meet his burden of proving he no longer had a mental illness and was not dangerous. In re Hayes, 151 N.C. App. 27, 564 S.E.2d 305, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 648 (2002).

Improper Incorporation of Examination Reports in Findings of Fact Held Harmless. —

Trial court erred by incorporating examination reports as findings of fact in its order because a patient asserted his right to confront the doctors who completed and signed the examination reports; however, the trial court’s error was harmless because even absent the reports, the testimony of a witness and the trial court’s findings were sufficient to support the trial court’s involuntary commitment order. In re C.G., 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (July 20, 2021).

§ 122C-268.1. Inpatient commitment; hearing following automatic commitment.

  1. A respondent who is committed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1321 shall be provided a hearing, unless waived, before the expiration of 50 days from the date of his commitment.
  2. The district attorney in the county in which the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity may represent the State’s interest at the hearing, rehearings, and supplemental rehearings. Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S. 122C-269 , if the district attorney elects to represent the State’s interest, upon motion of the district attorney, the venue for the hearing, rehearings, and supplemental rehearings shall be the county in which the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity. If the district attorney declines to represent the State’s interest, then the representation shall be determined as follows. An attorney, who is a member of the staff of the Attorney General assigned to one of the State’s facilities for the mentally ill or the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill, may represent the State’s interest at commitment hearings, rehearings, and supplemental hearings. Alternatively, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, designate an attorney who is a member of his staff to represent the State’s interest at any commitment hearing, rehearing, or supplemental hearing.
  3. The clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the hearing as provided in G.S. 122C-264(d1).
  4. The respondent shall be represented by counsel of his choice, or if he is indigent within the meaning of G.S. 7A-450 or refuses to retain counsel if financially able to do so, he shall be represented by counsel appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  5. With the consent of the court, counsel may in writing waive the presence of the respondent.
  6. Certified copies of reports and findings of physicians and psychologists and previous and current medical records are admissible in evidence, but the respondent’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses may not be denied.
  7. The hearing shall take place in the trial division in which the original trial was held. The hearing shall be open to the public. For purposes of this subsection, “trial division” means either the superior court division or the district court division of the General Court of Justice.
  8. A copy of all documents admitted into evidence and a transcript of the proceedings shall be furnished to the respondent on request by the clerk upon the direction of the presiding judge. If the respondent is indigent, the copies shall be provided at State expense.
  9. The respondent shall bear the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he (i) no longer has a mental illness as defined in G.S. 122C-3(21), or (ii) is no longer dangerous to others as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b. If the court is so satisfied, then the court shall order the respondent discharged and released. If the court finds that the respondent has not met his burden of proof, then the court shall order that inpatient commitment continue at a 24-hour facility designated pursuant to G.S. 122C-252 for a period not to exceed 90 days. The court shall make a written record of the facts that support its findings.
  10. Nothing in this section shall limit the respondent’s right to habeas corpus relief.

History. 1991, c. 37, s. 2; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1034, ss. 2, 3; 1995, c. 140, s. 1; 2000-144, s. 40.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

Legal Periodicals.

For comment, “Senate Bill 43: A Refinement of North Carolina’s Involuntary Civil Commitment Procedures,” see 14 Campbell L. Rev. 105 (1992).

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality. —

Subsection (i) of this section and G.S. 122C-276.1(c) do not violate the due process of equal protection clauses of the federal and State Constitutions. In re Hayes, 111 N.C. App. 384, 432 S.E.2d 862, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 799 (1993).

Amendment made in 1991 to subsection (i) of this section and G.S. 122C-276.1(c), which required respondent to bear the burden of proof to show that he was no longer dangerous or mentally ill and opened the hearing to the public, were procedural changes that did not violate substantive rights or protections though they could have disadvantaged respondent. Therefore, there was no violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In re Hayes, 111 N.C. App. 384, 432 S.E.2d 862, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 799 (1993).

Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittee. —

Trial court has authority to order a conditional release under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-277 , because the pain language in G.S. 122C-277 indicates that the General Assembly intended conditional release as a dispositional option in the insanity acquittee involuntary commitment context; construing the Act, G.S. 122C-268.1 , G.S. 122C-276.1 , and G.S. 122C-277 in pari materia, it is reasonable to read these statutes as providing the same dispositional alternatives, recommitment, discharge, or conditional release, regardless whether the hearing was initiated by a respondent’s treating physician or whether it was automatically calendared pursuant to a statutory mandate, and if a trial court may order a conditional release when requested by a treating physician, then the trial court itself has commensurate authority under G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release in an automatically calendared proceeding. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

Trial court erred in recommitting a respondent who was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity to involuntary inpatient treatment because the trial court, which was unaware that it had the option of conditionally releasing respondent, made its findings of fact and conclusions of law under a misapprehension of the law, and since the trial court did not make findings of fact that there was a reasonable probability that respondent’s seriously violent conduct would be repeated and that he would be dangerous to others in the future in the absence of an unconditional release, the court of appeals could not determine that the trial court, if aware that a conditional release was a legal disposition, would still have recommitted respondent; a trial court has authority following a hearing under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release of an insanity acquittee. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

§ 122C-269. Venue of hearing when respondent held at a 24-hour facility pending hearing.

  1. In all cases where the respondent is held at a 24-hour facility pending hearing as provided in G.S. 122C-268 , G.S. 122C-268 .1, 122C-276.1, or 122C-277(b1), unless the respondent through counsel objects to the venue, the hearing shall be held in the county in which the facility is located. Upon objection to venue, the hearing shall be held in the county where the petition was initiated, except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this section.
  2. An official of the facility shall immediately notify the clerk of superior court of the county in which the facility is located of a determination to hold the respondent pending hearing. That clerk shall request transmittal of all documents pertinent to the proceedings from the clerk of superior court where the proceedings were initiated. The requesting clerk shall assume all duties set forth in G.S. 122C-264 . The counsel provided for in G.S. 122C-268(d) shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  3. Upon motion of any interested person, the venue of an initial hearing described in G.S. 122C-268(c) or G.S. 122C-268.1 or a rehearing required by G.S. 122C-276(b), G.S. 122C-276.1 , or subsections (b) or (b1) of G.S. 122C-277 shall be moved to the county in which the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity or incapable of proceeding when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.

History. 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, s. 133; 1981, c. 537, s. 6; 1983, c. 380, s. 7; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1991, c. 37, ss. 11, 12; 1995, c. 140, s. 2; 2000-144, s. 41; 2001-487, s. 29.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

§ 122C-270. Attorneys to represent the respondent and the State.

  1. In a superior court district or set of districts as defined in G.S. 7A-41.1 in which a State facility for the mentally ill is located, the Commission on Indigent Defense Services shall appoint an attorney licensed to practice in North Carolina as special counsel for indigent respondents who are mentally ill. These special counsel shall serve at the pleasure of the Commission, may not privately practice law, and shall receive annual compensation within the salary range for assistant public defenders as fixed by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. The special counsel shall represent all indigent respondents at all hearings, rehearings, and supplemental hearings held at the State facility. Special counsel shall determine indigency in accordance with G.S. 7A-450(a). Indigency is subject to redetermination by the presiding judge. If the respondent appeals, counsel for the appeal shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  2. The State facility shall provide suitable office space for the counsel to meet privately with respondents. The Office of Indigent Defense Services shall provide secretarial and clerical service and necessary equipment and supplies for the office.
  3. In the event of a vacancy in the office of special counsel, counsel’s incapacity, or a conflict of interest, counsel for indigents at hearings or rehearings may be assigned in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services. No mileage or compensation for travel time is paid to a counsel appointed pursuant to this subsection. Counsel may also be so assigned when, in the opinion of the Director of the Office of Indigent Defense Services, the volume of cases warrants.
  4. At hearings held in counties other than those designated in subsection (a) of this section, counsel for indigent respondents shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  5. If the respondent is committed to a non-State 24-hour facility, assigned counsel remains responsible for the respondent’s representation at the trial level until discharged by order of district court, until the respondent is unconditionally discharged from the facility, or until the respondent voluntarily admits himself or herself to the facility. If the respondent is transferred to a State facility for the mentally ill, assigned counsel is discharged. If the respondent appeals, counsel for the appeal shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  6. The Attorney General may employ four attorneys, one to be assigned by him full-time to each of the State facilities for the mentally ill, to represent the State’s interest at commitment hearings, rehearings and supplemental hearings held under this Article at the State facilities for respondents admitted to those facilities pursuant to Part 3, 4, 7, or 8 of this Article or G.S. 15A-1321 and to provide liaison and consultation services concerning these matters. These attorneys are subject to Chapter 126 of the General Statutes and shall also perform additional duties as may be assigned by the Attorney General. The attorney employed by the Attorney General in accordance with G.S. 114-4.2 B shall represent the State’s interest at commitment hearings, rehearings and supplemental hearings held for respondents admitted to the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill pursuant to Part 3, 4, 7, or 8 of this Article or G.S. 15A-1321 .

History. 1973, c. 47, s. 2; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 11; 1979, c. 915, s. 12; 1983, c. 275, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 115; 1989, c. 141, s. 12; 1991, c. 257, s. 1; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 12(a); 2000-144, s. 42; 2006-264, s. 61(a).

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-264, s. 61(a), effective October 1, 2006, and applicable to appeals filed on or after that date, in subsection (a) deleted “and on appeals held under this Article” at the end of the third sentence, and added the sixth sentence; and rewrote subsection (e).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Although a minor cannot obtain legal representation without the consent of the legally responsible person, the rights of the child can be adequately protected. First, the Department of Social Services can conduct an investigation of the legally responsible person pursuant to G.S. 7A-542 et seq. (see now G.S. 7B-300 et seq.), the guardian ad litem program can provide additional support for abused, neglected, or dependent juveniles, including legal support and, a minor can receive representation for the commitment proceedings by virtue of G.S. 122C-224.1 and this section. See opinion of Attorney General to C. Robin Britt, Sr., Secretary, Department of Human Resources, — N.C.A.G. — (December 20, 1995).

§ 122C-271. Disposition.

  1. If a commitment examiner has recommended outpatient commitment and the respondent has been released pending the district court hearing, the court may make one of the following dispositions:
    1. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent has a mental illness; that the respondent is capable of surviving safely in the community with available supervision from family, friends, or others; that based on respondent’s treatment history, the respondent is in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) ; and that the respondent’s current mental status or the nature of the respondent’s illness limits or negates the respondent’s ability to make an informed decision to seek voluntarily or comply with recommended treatment, it may order outpatient commitment for a period not in excess of 90 days.
    2. If the court does not find that the respondent meets the criteria of commitment set out in subdivision (1) of this subsection, the respondent shall be discharged and the proposed outpatient physician center shall be so notified.
    3. Before ordering any outpatient commitment under this subsection, the court shall make findings of fact as to the availability of outpatient treatment from an outpatient treatment physician or center that has agreed to accept the respondent as a client of outpatient treatment services. The court shall show on the order the outpatient treatment physician or center that is to be responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment. If the designated outpatient treatment physician or center will be monitoring and supervising the respondent’s outpatient commitment pursuant to a contract for services with an LME/MCO, the court shall show on the order the identity of the LME/MCO. The clerk of court shall send a copy of the outpatient commitment order to the designated outpatient treatment physician or center and to the respondent client or the legally responsible person. The clerk of court shall also send a copy of the order to that LME/MCO. Copies of outpatient commitment orders sent by the clerk of court to an outpatient treatment center or physician under this section, including orders sent to an LME/MCO, shall be sent by the most reliable and expeditious means, but in no event less than 48 hours after the hearing.
  2. If the respondent has been held in a 24-hour facility pending the district court hearing pursuant to G.S. 122C-268 , the court may make one of the following dispositions:
    1. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent has a mental illness; that the respondent is capable of surviving safely in the community with available supervision from family, friends, or others; that based on respondent’s psychiatric history, the respondent is in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness as defined by G.S. 122C-3(11) ; and that the respondent’s current mental status or the nature of the respondent’s illness limits or negates the respondent’s ability to make an informed decision voluntarily to seek or comply with recommended treatment, it may order outpatient commitment for a period not in excess of 90 days. If the commitment proceedings were initiated as the result of the respondent’s being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found incapable of proceeding, the commitment order shall so show.
    2. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent has a mental illness and is dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11)b., it may order inpatient commitment at a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 for a period not in excess of 90 days. However, no respondent found to have both an intellectual disability and a mental illness may be committed to a State, area, or private facility for individuals with intellectual disabilities. An individual who has a mental illness and is dangerous to self, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11)a., or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11)b., may also be committed to a combination of inpatient and outpatient commitment at both a 24-hour facility and an outpatient treatment physician or center for a period not in excess of 90 days. If the commitment proceedings were initiated as the result of the respondent’s being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found incapable of proceeding, the commitment order shall so show. If the court orders inpatient commitment for a respondent who is under an outpatient commitment order, the outpatient commitment is terminated; and the clerk of the superior court of the county where the district court hearing is held shall send a notice of the inpatient commitment to the clerk of superior court where the outpatient commitment was being supervised.
    3. If the court does not find that the respondent meets either of the commitment criteria set out in subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection, the respondent shall be discharged, and the facility in which the respondent was last a client shall be so notified.
    4. Before ordering any outpatient commitment, the court shall make findings of fact as to the availability of outpatient treatment from an outpatient treatment physician or center that has agreed to accept the respondent as a client of outpatient treatment services. The court shall also show on the order the outpatient treatment physician or center who is to be responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment. When an outpatient commitment order is issued for a respondent held in a 24-hour facility, the court may order the respondent held at the facility for no more than 72 hours in order for the facility to notify the designated outpatient treatment physician or center of the treatment needs of the respondent. The clerk of court in the county where the facility is located shall send a copy of the outpatient commitment order to the designated outpatient treatment physician or center and to the respondent or the legally responsible person. If the designated outpatient treatment physician or center shall be monitoring and supervising the respondent’s outpatient commitment pursuant to a contract for services with an LME/MCO, the clerk of court shall show on the order the identity of the LME/MCO. The clerk of court shall send a copy of the order to the LME/MCO. Copies of outpatient commitment orders sent by the clerk of court to an outpatient treatment center or physician pursuant to this subdivision, including orders sent to an LME/MCO, shall be sent by the most reliable and expeditious means, but in no event less than 48 hours after the hearing. If the outpatient commitment will be supervised in a county other than the county where the commitment originated, the court shall order venue for further court proceedings to be transferred to the county where the outpatient commitment will be supervised. Upon an order changing venue, the clerk of superior court in the county where the commitment originated shall transfer the file to the clerk of superior court in the county where the outpatient commitment is to be supervised.
  3. If the respondent was found not guilty by reason of insanity and has been held in a 24-hour facility pending the court hearing held pursuant to G.S. 122C-268.1 , the court may make one of the following dispositions:
    1. If the court finds that the respondent has not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent no longer has a mental illness or that the respondent is no longer dangerous to others, it shall order inpatient treatment at a 24-hour facility for a period not to exceed 90 days.
    2. If the court finds that the respondent has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent no longer has a mental illness or that the respondent is no longer dangerous to others, the court shall order the respondent discharged and released.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 8; c. 739, s. 2; 1979, c. 358, s. 26; c. 915, ss. 8, 15, 16; 1981, c. 537, s. 1; 1983, c. 380, s. 8; c. 638, s. 14; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, ss. 20-22; 1989, c. 225, s. 1; c. 770, s. 73; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 8; 1991, c. 37, s. 13; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1034, s. 5; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 13; 2018-33, s. 30; 2019-76, s. 10.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 739, s. 15, effective January 1, 1997, and applicable to commitments on or after that date, provides: “Nothing in this act shall require hospitals licensed under G.S. 131E or G.S. 122C to contract with area mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities to provide inpatient or outpatient treatment for persons who are mentally retarded with mental illness.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (a) and subdivision (b)(4) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 30, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 33, provides: “Parts I and II of this act do not affect the coverage, eligibility, rights, responsibilities, or provision of State or federal services or benefits for individuals who have been diagnosed with mental retardation and whose diagnosis has not been changed to a diagnosis of intellectual disability.”

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 34, made the amendments by Session Laws 2019-76, s. 10 effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings commenced or services rendered on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 30, in subsection (a), in the introductory paragraph, substituted “a commitment examiner” for “an examining physician or eligible psychologist”; in subdivision (a)(2), substituted “proposed outpatient physician center” for “facility at which he was last a client”; added subdivision (a)(3); and, in subdivision (b)(4), in the first sentence, added “from an outpatient treatment physician or center that has agreed to accept the respondent as a client of outpatient treatment services” in the fourth sentence, added “and to the respondent or the legally responsible person” and added the fifth through seventh sentences. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-76, s. 10, rewrote subsections (a) and (b); and substituted “the respondent” for “he” in subdivisions (c)(1) and (c)(2). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Finding of Dangerousness. —

By requiring that the person be found dangerous to herself or others, the legislature has made it clear that involuntary commitment is not for all those who are mentally ill, or even for those whose mental illness may make it necessary for them to have custodial care. In re Doty, 38 N.C. App. 233, 247 S.E.2d 628, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2136 (1978) (decided under former statutory provisions).

Where the doctor testified only that the respondent was unable to care for herself and that she was a complete nursing care problem, there was no showing that the respondent was dangerous to herself and the requirements for involuntary commitment were not met. In re Doty, 38 N.C. App. 233, 247 S.E.2d 628, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2136 (1978) (decided under former statutory provisions).

Court’s Authority Limited If Defendant Found Not to Be Subject to Involuntary Commitment. —

Superior court had no authority to enter order requiring Division of Adult Probation and Parole, without its consent, to provide supervision of defendant, who had been determined incompetent to stand trial but not subject to involuntary commitment, while in custody of his former wife. State v. Gravette, 327 N.C. 114 , 393 S.E.2d 856 (1990).

In a case in which a trial court issued an order recommitting a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment and the patient contended that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because his initial commitment order in 2007 provided for a term of outpatient commitment that exceeded the period authorized by the governing statute, and the initial commitment period expired as a matter of law, the patient’s appeal was an improper collateral attack on the 2007 commitment order. It was undisputed on appeal that the trial court’s May 21, 2007 commitment order failed to comply with G.S. 122C-271(b), the patient failed to appeal from the initial order or request a supplemental hearing as permitted by G.S. 122C-272 . In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

In a case in which a trial court’s order recommitted a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment and the patient argued that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, while he used the phrase subject matter jurisdiction, he was actually arguing that the trial court did not have authority to order an 180-day commitment under G.S. 122C-271(b). There was no dispute that the trial court had authority to adjudicate the issues in dispute and had jurisdiction over the parties, as a result, the trial court’s May 21, 2007 order was not void, even if contrary to law; the trial court obtained jurisdiction over the civil commitment proceedings when the petition and affidavit were filed pursuant to G.S. 122C-261 . In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Maximum Length of Commitment Exceeded. —

Involuntary commitment order was reversed where the the trial court committed respondent to 30 days of inpatient treatment and 90 days of outpatient treatment, for a total commitment period of 120 days, and that period was in excess of the maximum allowed by G.S. 122C-271 . In re B.S., 270 N.C. App. 414, 840 S.E.2d 308, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 200 (2020).

§ 122C-272. Appeal.

Judgment of the district court is final. Appeal may be had to the Court of Appeals by the State or by any party on the record as in civil cases. Appeal does not stay the commitment unless so ordered by the Court of Appeals. The Attorney General represents the State’s interest on appeal. The district court retains limited jurisdiction for the purpose of hearing all reviews, rehearings, or supplemental hearings allowed or required under this Part.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, s. 19; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2009-570, s. 27.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-570, s. 27, effective August 28, 2009, substituted “Judgment” for “Judgement” at the beginning of the section.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1980 law on civil procedure, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1049 (1981).

CASE NOTES

Appeal is not moot solely because period of commitment has expired. In re Taylor, 25 N.C. App. 642, 215 S.E.2d 789, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2350 (1975) (decided under former statutory provisions).

Though respondent had been released, her appeal was not moot. So long as a judgment of involuntary commitment remains unchallenged, potentially adverse collateral consequences may continue. In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E.2d 409, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2283 (1975) (decided under former statutory provisions).

Although a patient’s involuntary commitment period had expired, the patient’s appeal was not moot given the possibility that the patient’s commitment in the case might form the basis for a future commitment, along with other collateral legal consequences. In re Derrick Woodard, 249 N.C. App. 64, 791 S.E.2d 109, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 866 (2016).

Effect of Discharge on Challenge to Involuntary Commitment. —

Discharge does not render questions challenging the involuntary commitment proceeding moot in view of the adverse consequences which could arise therefrom, including the possibility that the commitment could form the basis of a future commitment. In re Williamson, 36 N.C. App. 362, 244 S.E.2d 189, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2483 (1978) (decided under former statutory provisions).

In order to challenge the improper commitment period contained in the trial court’s May 21, 2007 order, the patient was required to appeal that 2007 order pursuant to G.S. 122C-272 or to request a supplemental hearing under G.S. 122C-274(e). In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

In a case in which a trial court issued an order recommitting a patient to a third 180-day period of involuntary outpatient treatment and the patient contended that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because his initial commitment order in 2007 provided for a term of outpatient commitment that exceeded the period authorized by the governing statute, and the initial commitment period expired as a matter of law, the patient’s appeal was an improper collateral attack on the 2007 commitment order. It was undisputed on appeal that the trial court’s May 21, 2007 commitment order failed to comply with G.S. 122C-271(b), the patient failed to appeal from the initial order or request a supplemental hearing as permitted by G.S. 122C-272 . In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

Alternative to Actual Transcript Provided Meaningful Review. —

Patient was not deprived of the opportunity for meaningful appellate review of the patient’s involuntary commitment hearing because the patient could not show prejudice by the absence of an actual transcript of the hearing as the patient was able to obtain an adequate alternative through a memorandum provided by the judge which gave a detailed account of the testimony offered at the hearing that was supplemented by the handwritten notes of the patient’s counsel and the summary of the State of North Carolina’s counsel concerning the hearing. In re Derrick Woodard, 249 N.C. App. 64, 791 S.E.2d 109, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 866 (2016).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Granted. —

In the absence of a properly filed notice of appeal, the court of appeals had no jurisdiction to consider a patient’s appeal of an involuntary commitment order as of right; however, because the patient’s counsel objected to the proceedings and demonstrated the intent to appeal the trial court’s order, and because involuntary commitment was a significant incursion to one’s liberty interests, the court of appeals granted the patient’s petition for writ of certiorari and reviewed the order. In re C.G., 2021-NCCOA-344, 278 N.C. App. 416, 863 S.E.2d 237, 2021- NCCOA-344, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 369 (2021).

§ 122C-273. Duties for follow-up on commitment order.

  1. Unless prohibited by Chapter 90 of the General Statutes, if the commitment order directs outpatient treatment, the outpatient treatment physician may prescribe or administer, or the center may administer, to the respondent reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment that are consistent with accepted medical standards.
    1. If the respondent fails to comply or clearly refuses to comply with all or part of the prescribed treatment, the physician, the physician’s designee, or the center shall make all reasonable effort to solicit the respondent’s compliance. These efforts shall be documented and reported to the court with a request for a supplemental hearing.
    2. If the respondent fails to comply, but does not clearly refuse to comply, with all or part of the prescribed treatment after reasonable effort to solicit the respondent’s compliance, the physician, the physician’s designee, or the center may request the court to order the respondent taken into custody for the purpose of examination. Upon receipt of this request, the clerk shall issue an order to a law-enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody and to take him immediately to the designated outpatient treatment physician or center for examination. The custody order is valid throughout the State. The law-enforcement officer shall turn the respondent over to the custody of the physician or center who shall conduct the examination and then release the respondent. The law-enforcement officer may wait during the examination and return the respondent to his home after the examination. An examination conducted under this subsection in which a physician or eligible psychologist determines that the respondent meets the criteria for inpatient commitment may be substituted for the first examination required by G.S. 122C-263 if the clerk or magistrate issues a custody order within six hours after the examination was performed.
    3. In no case may the respondent be physically forced to take medication or forcibly detained for treatment unless he poses an immediate danger to himself or others. In such cases inpatient commitment proceedings shall be initiated.
    4. At any time that the outpatient treatment physician or center finds that the respondent no longer meets the criteria set out in G.S. 122C-263 (d)(1), the physician or center shall so notify the court and the case shall be terminated; provided, however, if the respondent was initially committed as a result of conduct resulting in his being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found incapable of proceeding, the designated outpatient treatment physician or center shall notify the clerk that discharge is recommended. The clerk shall calendar a supplemental hearing as provided in G.S. 122C-274 to determine whether the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment.
    5. Any individual who has knowledge that a respondent on outpatient commitment has become dangerous to himself, as defined by G.S. 122C-3(11) a., and others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b., may initiate a new petition for inpatient commitment as provided in this Part. If the respondent is committed as an inpatient, the outpatient commitment shall be terminated and notice sent by the clerk of court in the county where the respondent is committed as an inpatient to the clerk of court of the county where the outpatient commitment is being supervised.
  2. If the respondent on outpatient commitment intends to move or moves to another county within the State, the designated outpatient treatment physician or center shall request that the clerk of court in the county where the outpatient commitment is being supervised calendar a supplemental hearing.
  3. If the respondent moves to another state or to an unknown location, the designated outpatient treatment physician or center shall notify the clerk of superior court of the county where the outpatient commitment is supervised and the outpatient commitment shall be terminated.
  4. If the commitment order directs inpatient treatment, the physician attending the respondent may administer to the respondent reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment that are consistent with accepted medical standards. The attending physician shall release or discharge the respondent in accordance with G.S. 122C-277 .

History. 1983, c. 638, s. 16; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, ss. 23-26; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 9; 1991, c. 37, s. 14; 2004-23, s. 2(b).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-23, s. 2(b), effective June 25, 2004, inserted the third sentence in subdivision (a)(2).

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “Civil Commitment of Minors: Due and Undue Process,” see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1133 (1980).

§ 122C-274. Supplemental hearings.

  1. Upon receipt of a request for a supplemental hearing, the clerk shall calendar a hearing to be held within 14 days and notify, at least 72 hours before the hearing, the petitioner, the respondent, his attorney, if any, and the designated outpatient treatment physician or center. The respondent shall be notified at least 72 hours before the hearing by personally serving on him an order to appear. Other persons shall be notified as provided in G.S. 122C-264(c).
  2. The procedures for the hearing shall follow G.S. 122C-267 .
  3. In supplemental hearings for alleged noncompliance, the court shall determine whether the respondent has failed to comply and, if so, the causes for noncompliance. If the court determines that the respondent has failed or refused to comply it may:
    1. Upon finding probable cause to believe that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to himself, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) a., or others, as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b., order an examination by the same or different physician or eligible psychologist as provided in G.S. 122C-263(c) in order to determine the necessity for continued outpatient or inpatient commitment;
    2. Reissue or change the outpatient commitment order in accordance with G.S. 122C-271 ; or
    3. Discharge the respondent from the order and dismiss the case.
  4. At the supplemental hearing for a respondent who has moved or intends to move to another county, the court shall determine if the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment set out in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1). If the court determines that the respondent no longer meets the criteria for outpatient commitment, it shall discharge the respondent from the order and dismiss the case. If the court determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria for outpatient commitment, it shall continue the outpatient commitment but shall designate a physician or center at the respondent’s new residence to be responsible for the management or supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment. The court shall order the respondent to appear for treatment at the address of the newly designated outpatient treatment physician or center and shall order venue for further court proceedings under the outpatient commitment to be transferred to the new county of supervision. Upon an order changing venue, the clerk of court in the county where the outpatient commitment has been supervised shall transfer the records regarding the outpatient commitment to the clerk of court in the county where the commitment will be supervised. Also, the clerk of court in the county where the outpatient commitment has been supervised shall send a copy of the court’s order directing the continuation of outpatient treatment under new supervision to the newly designated outpatient treatment physician or center.
  5. At any time during the term of an outpatient commitment order, a respondent may apply to the court for a supplemental hearing for the purpose of discharge from the order. The application shall be made in writing by the respondent to the clerk of superior court of the county where the outpatient commitment is being supervised. At the supplemental hearing the court shall determine whether the respondent continues to meet the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1). The court may either reissue or change the commitment order or discharge the respondent and dismiss the case.
  6. At supplemental hearings requested pursuant to G.S. 122C-277(a) for transfer from inpatient to outpatient commitment, the court shall determine whether the respondent meets the criteria for either inpatient or outpatient commitment. If the court determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria for inpatient commitment, it shall order the continuation of the original commitment order. If the court determines that the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment, it shall order outpatient commitment for a period of time not in excess of 90 days. If the court finds that the respondent does not meet either criteria, the respondent shall be discharged and the case dismissed.

History. 1983, c. 638, s. 17; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 823, s. 10.

CASE NOTES

In order to challenge the improper commitment period contained in the trial court’s May 21, 2007 order, the patient was required to appeal that 2007 order pursuant to G.S. 122C-272 or to request a supplemental hearing under G.S. 122C-274(e). In re Webber, 201 N.C. App. 212, 689 S.E.2d 468, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 2209 (2009), cert. denied, 364 N.C. 241 , 699 S.E.2d 925, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 504 (2010).

§ 122C-275. Outpatient commitment; rehearings.

  1. Fifteen days before the end of the initial or subsequent periods of outpatient commitment if the outpatient treatment physician or center determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), he shall so notify the clerk of superior court of the county where the outpatient commitment is supervised. If the respondent no longer meets the criteria, the physician shall so notify the clerk who shall dismiss the case; provided, however, if the respondent was initially committed as a result of conduct resulting in his being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and the respondent was found incapable of proceeding, the physician or center shall notify the clerk that discharge is recommended. The clerk, at least 10 days before the end of the commitment period, on order of the district court, shall calendar the rehearing.
  2. Notice and procedures of rehearings are governed by the same procedures as initial hearings, and the respondent has the same rights he had at the initial hearing including the right to appeal.
  3. If the court finds that the respondent no longer meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), it shall unconditionally discharge him. A copy of the discharge order shall be furnished by the clerk to the designated outpatient treatment physician or center. If the respondent continues to meet the criteria of G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), the court may order outpatient commitment for an additional period not in excess of 180 days.

History. 1983, c. 638, s. 20; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1991, c. 37, s. 15.

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality. —

See In re Rogers, 63 N.C. App. 705, 306 S.E.2d 510, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 3185 (1983) (decided under prior law) .

§ 122C-276. Inpatient commitment; rehearings for respondents other than insanity acquittees.

  1. Fifteen days before the end of the initial inpatient commitment period if the attending physician determines that commitment of a respondent beyond the initial period will be necessary, he shall so notify the clerk of superior court of the county in which the facility is located. The clerk, at least 10 days before the end of the initial period, on order of a district court judge of the district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 in which the facility is located, shall calendar the rehearing. If the respondent was initially committed as the result of conduct resulting in his being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and respondent was found incapable of proceeding, the clerk shall also notify the chief district court judge, the clerk of superior court, and the district attorney in the county in which the respondent was found incapable of proceeding of the time and place of the hearing.
  2. Fifteen days before the end of the initial treatment period of a respondent who was initially committed as a result of conduct resulting in his being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, having been found incapable of proceeding, if the attending physician determines that commitment of the respondent beyond the initial period will not be necessary, he shall so notify the clerk of superior court who shall schedule a rehearing as provided in subsection (a) of this section.
  3. Subject to the provisions of G.S. 122C-269(c), rehearings shall be held as authorized in G.S. 122C-268(g). The judge is a judge of the district court of the district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 in which the facility is located or a district court judge temporarily assigned to that district.
  4. Notice and proceedings of rehearings are governed by the same procedures as initial hearings and the respondent has the same rights he had at the initial hearing including the right to appeal.
  5. At rehearings the court may make the same dispositions authorized in G.S. 122C-271(b) except a second commitment order may be for an additional period not in excess of 180 days.
  6. Fifteen days before the end of the second commitment period and annually thereafter, the attending physician shall review and evaluate the condition of each respondent; and if he determines that a respondent is in continued need of inpatient commitment or, in the alternative, in need of outpatient commitment, or a combination of both, he shall so notify the respondent, his counsel, and the clerk of superior court of the county, in which the facility is located. Unless the respondent through his counsel files with the clerk a written waiver of his right to a rehearing, the clerk, on order of a district court judge of the district in which the facility is located, shall calendar a rehearing for not later than the end of the current commitment period. The procedures and standards for the rehearing are the same as for the first rehearing. No third or subsequent inpatient recommitment order shall be for a period longer than one year.
  7. At any rehearings the court has the option to order outpatient commitment for a period not in excess of 180 days in accordance with the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1) and following the procedures as specified in this Article.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 9; 1979, c. 915, ss. 9, 17; 1981, c. 537, ss. 2-4; 1983, c. 638, ss. 18, 19; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 116; 1991, c. 37, s. 5; 2018-33, s. 31.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of subsection (c) of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 31, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 31, substituted “as authorized in G.S. 122C-268(g)” for “at the facility in which the respondent is receiving treatment” in the first sentence of subsection (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Most of the cases below were decided under former statutory provisions.

The indeterminate commitment of any patient without periodic rehearings is clearly proscribed. In re Mikels, 31 N.C. App. 470, 230 S.E.2d 155, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2019 (1976).

Findings Prerequisite to Commitment. —

In order to support the recommitment of a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding, the trial court must find by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, is dangerous to himself or others, and is in need of continued hospitalization. In re Mackie, 36 N.C. App. 638, 244 S.E.2d 450, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2569 (1978).

Facts Must Be Found and Recorded. —

The two ultimate facts of (1) mental illness or inebriety and (2) danger, must be supported by facts which are found from the evidence and recorded by the district court. In re Mackie, 36 N.C. App. 638, 244 S.E.2d 450, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2569 (1978).

The “words” imminently dangerous” in former section simply meant that a person posed a danger to himself or others in the immediate future. In re Ballard, 34 N.C. App. 228, 237 S.E.2d 541, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1646 (1977).

Overt Acts. —

An overt act may be clear, cogent and convincing evidence which will support a finding of danger, but it is not necessary that there be an overt act to establish imminent dangerousness. In re Ballard, 34 N.C. App. 228, 237 S.E.2d 541, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 1646 (1977).

Effect of G.S. 8-53 . —

For discussion of former statutory provisions making it manifest that the physician’s role in involuntary commitment proceedings was not intended to be inhibited by G.S. 8-53 , see In re Farrow, 41 N.C. App. 680, 255 S.E.2d 777, 1979 N.C. App. LEXIS 2728 (1979).

Disposition If Notice Is Insufficient. —

The 15-day period of former G.S. 122-58.11 did not have the effect of a statute of limitations so as to necessitate dismissal of a proceeding brought on less notice. Dismissal was too drastic, and unless the respondent could show some prejudice, the proper response would be to continue the proceeding until ample notice had been given. In re Boyles, 38 N.C. App. 389, 247 S.E.2d 785, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2194 (1978), dismissed, 296 N.C. 411 , 251 S.E.2d 468, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1165 (1979).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. J. Laird Jacob, Jr., Broughton Hospital, 44 N.C.A.G. 33 (1974), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-276.1. Inpatient commitment; rehearings for respondents who are insanity acquittees.

  1. At least 15 days before the end of any inpatient commitment period ordered pursuant to G.S. 122C-268.1 , the clerk shall calendar the hearing and notify the parties as specified in G.S. 122C-264(d1), unless the hearing is waived by the respondent.
  2. The proceedings of the rehearing shall be governed by the same procedures provided by G.S. 122C-268.1 .
  3. The respondent shall bear the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he (i) no longer has a mental illness as defined in G.S. 122C-3(21), or (ii) is no longer dangerous to others as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) b. If the court is so satisfied, then the court shall order the respondent discharged and released. If the court finds that the respondent has not met his burden of proof, then the court shall order inpatient commitment be continued for a period not to exceed 180 days. The court shall make a written record of the facts that support its findings.
  4. At least 15 days before the end of any commitment period ordered pursuant to subsection (c) of this section and annually thereafter, the clerk shall calendar the hearing and notify the parties as specified in G.S. 122C-264(d1). The procedures and standards for the rehearing are the same as under this section. No third or subsequent inpatient recommitment order shall be for a period longer than one year.

History. 1991, c. 37, s. 3; 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 1034, s. 4.

CASE NOTES

Constitutionality. —

Subsection (c) of this section and G.S. 122C-268.1(i) do not violate the due process of equal protection clauses of the federal and State Constitutions. In re Hayes, 111 N.C. App. 384, 432 S.E.2d 862, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 799 (1993).

Amendment made in 1991 to subsection (c) of this section and G.S. 122C-268.1(i), which required respondent to bear the burden of proof to show that he was no longer dangerous or mentally ill and opened the hearing to the public were procedural changes that did not violate substantive rights or protections though they could have disadvantaged respondent. Therefore, there was no violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In re Hayes, 111 N.C. App. 384, 432 S.E.2d 862, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 799 (1993).

Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittee. —

Trial court has authority to order a conditional release under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-277 , because the pain language in G.S. 122C-277 indicates that the General Assembly intended conditional release as a dispositional option in the insanity acquittee involuntary commitment context; construing the Act, G.S. 122C-268.1 , G.S. 122C-276.1 , and G.S. 122C-277 in pari materia, it is reasonable to read these statutes as providing the same dispositional alternatives, recommitment, discharge, or conditional release, regardless whether the hearing was initiated by a respondent’s treating physician or whether it was automatically calendared pursuant to a statutory mandate, and if a trial court may order a conditional release when requested by a treating physician, then the trial court itself has commensurate authority under G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release in an automatically calendared proceeding. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

Trial court erred in recommitting a respondent who was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity to involuntary inpatient treatment because the trial court, which was unaware that it had the option of conditionally releasing respondent, made its findings of fact and conclusions of law under a misapprehension of the law, and since the trial court did not make findings of fact that there was a reasonable probability that respondent’s seriously violent conduct would be repeated and that he would be dangerous to others in the future in the absence of an unconditional release, the court of appeals could not determine that the trial court, if aware that a conditional release was a legal disposition, would still have recommitted respondent; a trial court has authority following a hearing under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release of an insanity acquittee. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

The trial court correctly found the appellant “dangerous to others,” under this section and G.S. 122C-3(11) , in spite of the appellant’s objection that murders which happened 10 years in the past should not be considered because of their “remoteness,” where, from both evidentiary and medical perspectives, the nature of his crimes was more important than their timing, and where the court’s findings on his dangerousness were also rooted in additional evidence unrelated to his prior crimes, including (1) his past and present mental illness, (2) his behavior since July 17, 1988 (including “slaw incident” during which he became upset and angry with his job supervisor over his co-worker’s premature disposal of coleslaw from the hospital grill where he was employed), and (3) his high likelihood of post-release relapse into multi-substance abuse, which all experts agreed was a trigger for his 1988 psychosis during which he killed four people and wounded several others. In re Hayes, 139 N.C. App. 114, 532 S.E.2d 553, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 820 (2000).

Record supported trial court’s judgment that defendant who was acquitted of multiple homicides by reason of insanity and was committed to a mental hospital did not meet his burden of proving he no longer had a mental illness and was not dangerous. In re Hayes, 151 N.C. App. 27, 564 S.E.2d 305, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 648 (2002).

Appellate Review. —

Because respondent, who was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, failed to present any argument to the trial court that conditional release was a dispositional alternative under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-276.1 , he failed to properly preserve the issue for appellate review; however, the court of appeals addressed the issue to prevent manifest injustice to respondent because the assumption that the only alternative to recommitment was an unconditional release was a fundamental aspect of the State’s argument for continued inpatient commitment and a critical component of the trial court’s order, and the issue presented by respondent’s appeal would arise in every recommitment hearing of a person who had been committed by virtue of having been found not guilty by reason of insanity. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

§ 122C-277. Release and conditional release; judicial review.

  1. Except as provided in subsections (b) and (b1) of this section, the attending physician shall discharge a committed respondent unconditionally at any time he determines that the respondent is no longer in need of inpatient commitment. However, if the attending physician determines that the respondent meets the criteria for outpatient commitment as defined in G.S. 122C-263(d)(1), he may request the clerk to calendar a supplemental hearing to determine whether an outpatient commitment order shall be issued. Except as provided in subsections (b) and (b1) of this section, the attending physician may also release a respondent conditionally for periods not in excess of 30 days on specified medically appropriate conditions. Violation of the conditions is grounds for return of the respondent to the releasing facility. A law-enforcement officer, on request of the attending physician, shall take a conditional releasee into custody and return him to the facility in accordance with G.S. 122C-205 . Notice of discharge and of conditional release shall be furnished to the clerk of superior court of the county of commitment and of the county in which the facility is located.
  2. If the respondent was initially committed as the result of conduct resulting in his being charged with a violent crime, including a crime involving an assault with a deadly weapon, and respondent was found incapable of proceeding, 15 days before the respondent’s discharge or conditional release the attending physician shall notify the clerk of superior court of the county in which the facility is located of his determination regarding the proposed discharge or conditional release. The clerk shall then schedule a rehearing to determine the appropriateness of respondent’s release under the standards of commitment set forth in G.S. 122C-271(b). The clerk shall give notice as provided in G.S. 122C-264(d). The district attorney of the district where respondent was found incapable of proceeding may represent the State’s interest at the hearing. (b1) If the respondent was initially committed pursuant to G.S. 15A-1321 , 15 days before the respondent’s discharge or conditional release the attending physician shall notify the clerk of superior court. The clerk shall calendar a hearing and shall give notice as provided by G.S. 122C-264(d1). The district attorney for the original trial may represent the State’s interest at the hearing. The hearing shall be conducted under the standards and procedures set forth in G.S. 122C-268.1 . Provided, that in no event shall discharge or conditional release under this section be allowed for a respondent during the period from automatic commitment to hearing under G.S. 122C-268.1 .
  3. If a committed respondent under subsections (a), (b), or (b1) of this section is from a single portal area, the attending physician shall plan jointly with the area authority as prescribed in the area plan before discharging or releasing the respondent.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1981, c. 537, s. 5; 1983, c. 383, s. 6; c. 638, s. 21; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1991, c. 37, s. 6.

Legal Periodicals.

For note, “Psychiatrists’ Liability to Third Parties for Harmful Acts Committed by Dangerous Patients,” see 64 N.C.L. Rev. 1534 (1986).

CASE NOTES

Notice and Hearing. —

The statutory provisions of former G.S. 122-58.13(b) requiring notice and hearing prior to release from involuntary commitment were mandatory and not merely directive, applied in every case in which a respondent was initially committed after a judicial determination of not guilty by reason of insanity or incapacity to stand trial, and remained applicable throughout a respondent’s commitment. In re Rogers, 78 N.C. App. 202, 336 S.E.2d 682, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 4284 (1985).

Court’s Authority Limited If Defendant Found Not to Be Subject to Involuntary Commitment. —

Superior court had no authority to enter order requiring Division of Adult Probation and Parole, without its consent, to provide supervision of defendant, who had been determined incompetent to stand trial but not subject to involuntary commitment, while in custody of his former wife. State v. Gravette, 327 N.C. 114 , 393 S.E.2d 856 (1990).

Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittee. —

Trial court has authority to order a conditional release under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-277 , because the pain language in G.S. 122C-277 indicates that the General Assembly intended conditional release as a dispositional option in the insanity acquittee involuntary commitment context; construing the Act, G.S. 122C-268.1 , G.S. 122C-276.1 , and G.S. 122C-277 in pari materia, it is reasonable to read these statutes as providing the same dispositional alternatives, recommitment, discharge, or conditional release, regardless whether the hearing was initiated by a respondent’s treating physician or whether it was automatically calendared pursuant to a statutory mandate, and if a trial court may order a conditional release when requested by a treating physician, then the trial court itself has commensurate authority under G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release in an automatically calendared proceeding. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

Trial court erred in recommitting a respondent who was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity to involuntary inpatient treatment because the trial court, which was unaware that it had the option of conditionally releasing respondent, made its findings of fact and conclusions of law under a misapprehension of the law, and since the trial court did not make findings of fact that there was a reasonable probability that respondent’s seriously violent conduct would be repeated and that he would be dangerous to others in the future in the absence of an unconditional release, the court of appeals could not determine that the trial court, if aware that a conditional release was a legal disposition, would still have recommitted respondent; a trial court has authority following a hearing under the Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Act of 1985, G.S. 122C-268.1 and G.S. 122C-276.1 to order a conditional release of an insanity acquittee. In re Hayes, 199 N.C. App. 69, 681 S.E.2d 395, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1382 (2009).

Jury Adequately Charged Regarding Procedures Under Acquittal on Grounds of Insanity. —

Pattern jury instruction in N.C.P.I.—Crim. 304.10 which informed the jury of the commitment hearing procedures in G.S. 15A-1321 and 15A-1322, pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 122C, adequately charged the jury regarding procedures under acquittal on the ground of insanity. State v. Allen, 322 N.C. 176 , 367 S.E.2d 626, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 295 (1988).

§ 122C-278. Reexamination for capacity to proceed prior to discharge.

Whenever a respondent has been committed to either inpatient or outpatient treatment pursuant to this Chapter after having been found incapable of proceeding and referred by the court for civil commitment proceedings, the respondent shall not be discharged from the custody of the hospital or institution or the outpatient commitment case terminated until the respondent has been examined for capacity to proceed and a report filed with the clerk of court pursuant to G.S. 15A-1002 .

History. 2013-18, s. 8.

§§ 122C-279, 122C-280.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 8. Involuntary Commitment of Substance Abusers, Facilities for Substance Abusers.

§ 122C-281. Affidavit and petition before clerk or magistrate; custody order.

  1. Any individual who has knowledge of a substance abuser who is dangerous to self or others may appear before a clerk or assistant or deputy clerk of superior court or a magistrate, execute an affidavit to this effect, and petition the clerk or magistrate for issuance of an order to take the respondent into custody for examination by a commitment examiner. The affidavit shall include the facts on which the affiant’s opinion is based. Jurisdiction under this subsection is in the clerk or magistrate in the county where the respondent resides or is found.
  2. If the clerk or magistrate finds reasonable grounds to believe that the facts alleged in the affidavit are true and that the respondent is probably a substance abuser and dangerous to self or others, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer or any other person designated under G.S.122C-251(g) to take the respondent into custody for examination by a commitment examiner.
  3. If the clerk or magistrate issues a custody order, the clerk or magistrate shall also make inquiry in any reliable way as to whether the respondent is indigent within the meaning of G.S. 7A-450 . A magistrate shall report the result of this inquiry to the clerk.
  4. If the affiant is a commitment examiner who has examined the respondent, he or she may execute the affidavit before any official authorized to administer oaths. The commitment examiner is not required to appear before the clerk or magistrate for this purpose. The commitment examiner’s examination shall comply with the requirements of the initial examination as provided in G.S. 122C-283(c). The affiant shall file the affidavit and examination findings with the clerk of court in the manner described in G.S. 122C-261(d)(1). If the commitment examiner recommends commitment and the clerk or magistrate finds probable cause to believe that the respondent meets the criteria for commitment, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody for transportation to a 24-hour facility, or, if the respondent is released pending hearing, as described in G.S. 122C-283(d)(1), order that a hearing be held as provided in G.S. 122C-284(a). If a physician or eligible psychologist executes an affidavit for commitment of a respondent, a second qualified professional shall perform the examination required by G.S. 122C-285 . Any person or entity who or which has been designated in compliance with G.S. 122C-251(g) shall be permitted to complete all or part of the duties of a law enforcement officer, in accord with the designation.
  5. Upon receipt of the custody order of the clerk or magistrate, a law enforcement officer or other designated person identified in the order shall take the respondent into custody within 24 hours after the order is signed. The custody order is valid throughout the State.

    (e1) No commitment examiner, area facility, acute care hospital, general hospital, or other site of first examination, or their officials, staff, employees, or other individuals responsible for the custody, examination, detention, management, supervision, treatment, or release of an individual examined for commitment, who is not grossly negligent, shall be held liable in any civil or criminal action for taking measures to temporarily detain an individual for the period of time necessary to complete a commitment examination, submit an affidavit to the magistrate or clerk of court, and await the issuance of a custody order as authorized by subsection (d) of this section.

  6. Repealed by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 32, effective October 1, 2019.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 3; 1979, c. 164, s. 2; c. 915, ss. 3, 18; 1983, c. 383, s. 5; c. 638, ss. 3-5; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, ss. 2, 4; 2004-23, s. 1(b); 2018-33, s. 32.

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2006-2007 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 32, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-23, s. 1(b), effective June 25, 2004, added the last sentence in subsection (e).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 32, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Some of the cases below were decided under former statutory provisions.

Requirements of former G.S. 122-58.3 (see now G.S. 122C-261 and 122C-281) were required to be followed diligently. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980); In re Barnhill, 72 N.C. App. 530, 325 S.E.2d 308, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3106 (1985).

Contents and Sufficiency of Affidavit. —

The affidavit must set out facts upon which the affiant’s opinion is based. Such facts must be sufficient to establish to the affiant’s satisfaction that the patient is imminently dangerous to himself or others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

No Duty to Third Parties. —

When a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding is delivered to a hospital for an initial examination to recommend whether commitment is required, neither the examiner nor the hospital obtains custody or a legal right to control the respondent unless and until involuntary commitment is recommended; neither the examiner nor the facility owes a duty to third parties for harm resulting from an examiner’s recommendation, even if the examination failed to comply with statutory requirements. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

§ 122C-282. Special emergency procedure for violent individuals.

When an individual subject to commitment under the provisions of this Part is also violent and requires restraint and when delay in taking the individual to a commitment examiner for examination would likely endanger life or property, a law enforcement officer may take the person into custody and take him or her immediately before a magistrate or clerk. The law enforcement officer shall execute the affidavit required by G.S. 122C-281 and in addition shall swear that the respondent is violent and requires restraint and that delay in taking the respondent to a commitment examiner for an examination would endanger life or property.

If the clerk or magistrate finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the facts stated in the affidavit are true, that the respondent is in fact violent and requires restraint, and that delay in taking the respondent to a commitment examiner for an examination would endanger life or property, the clerk or magistrate shall order the law enforcement officer to take the respondent directly to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 .

Respondents received at a 24-hour facility under the provisions of this section shall be examined and processed thereafter in the same way as all other respondents under this Part.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 33.

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 1.2, provides: “This act shall be known as ‘The Current Operations and Capital Improvements Appropriations Act of 2006’.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.3, provides: “Except for statutory changes or other provisions that clearly indicate an intention to have effects beyond the 2006-2007 fiscal year, the textual provisions of this act apply only to funds appropriated for, and activities occurring during, the 2006-2007 fiscal year.”

Session Laws 2006-66, s. 28.6, is a severability clause.

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 33, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 33, substituted “commitment examiner” for “physician or eligible psychologist” throughout; in the first paragraph, substituted “the individual” for “him” in the first sentence; in the second paragraph, substituted “the clerk or magistrate shall” for “he shall”; and made minor stylistic and gender neutral changes. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1980 constitutional law, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1097 (1981).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

The case annotated below was decided under former statutory provisions.

Former G.S. 122-58.18 (see now G.S. 122C-262 and 122C-282) was not intended to be used indiscriminately, and clearly defined the limited time and circumstances for its use. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

Affidavit. —

The affidavit must set out facts upon which the affiant’s opinion is based. Such facts must be sufficient to establish to the affiant’s satisfaction that the patient is imminently dangerous to himself or others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

Reliance on Information Gained from Others. —

An officer’s petition for involuntary commitment of respondent pursuant to the emergency procedures for violent persons was not required to be dismissed because the officer did not personally observe the respondent in an act of violence but relied on information gained from others. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

No Overt Act Required. —

In finding one to be imminently dangerous, there is no requirement of an overt act. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

Concealing a potentially dangerous weapon is evidence of imminent danger. In re Hernandez, 46 N.C. App. 265, 264 S.E.2d 780, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 2827 (1980).

§ 122C-283. Duties of law enforcement officer; first examination by commitment examiner.

  1. Without unnecessary delay after assuming custody, the law enforcement officer or the individual designated or required to provide transportation under G.S. 122C-251(g) shall take the respondent to a facility or other location identified by the LME/MCO in the community crisis services plan adopted pursuant to G.S. 122C-202.2 that has an available commitment examiner and is capable of performing a first examination in conjunction with a health screening in the same location, unless circumstances indicate the respondent appears to be suffering a medical emergency in which case the law enforcement officer will seek immediate medical assistance for the respondent. If a commitment examiner is not available, whether on-site, on-call, or via telehealth, at any facility or location, or if a plan has not been adopted, the person designated to provide transportation shall take the respondent to an alternative non-hospital provider or facility-based crisis center for a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location. If no non-hospital provider or facility-based crisis center for a first examination in conjunction with a health screening at the same location, the person designated to provide transportations shall take the respondent to a private hospital or clinic, a general hospital, an acute care hospital, or a State facility for individuals with mental illnesses. If a commitment examiner is not immediately available, the respondent may be temporarily detained in an area facility if one is available; if an area facility is not available, the respondent may be detained under appropriate supervision, in the respondent’s home, in a private hospital or a clinic, or in a general hospital, but not in a jail or other penal facility. For the purposes of this section, “non-hospital provider” means an outpatient provider that provides either behavioral health or medical services.
  2. The examination set forth in subsection (a) of this section is not required if:
    1. The affiant who obtained the custody order is a physician or eligible psychologist; or
    2. The respondent is in custody under the special emergency procedure described in G.S. 122C-282 . In these cases when it is recommended that the respondent be detained in a 24-hour facility, the law-enforcement officer shall take the respondent directly to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 .
  3. The commitment examiner described in subsection (a) of this section shall examine the respondent as soon as possible, and in any event within 24 hours, after the respondent is presented for examination. The examination performed by a commitment examiner pursuant to subsection (a) of this section may be performed either in the physical face-to-face presence of the commitment examiner or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. A commitment examiner who examines a respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subsection (d) of this section would not be different if the examination had been conducted in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. A commitment examiner who is not so satisfied shall note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent shall be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a person authorized to perform examinations under this section. As used in this section, “telehealth” is the use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other. A recipient is referred by one provider to receive the services of another provider via telehealth. The examination shall include but is not limited to an assessment of all of the following:
    1. The respondent’s current and previous substance abuse including, if available, previous treatment history.
    2. The respondent’s dangerousness to self or others as defined in G.S. 122C-3(11) .
  4. After the conclusion of the examination the physician or eligible psychologist shall make the following determinations:
    1. If the physician or eligible psychologist finds that the respondent is a substance abuser and is dangerous to himself or others, he shall recommend commitment and whether the respondent should be released or be held at a 24-hour facility pending hearing and shall so show on [the] his examination report. Based on the physician’s or eligible psychologist’s recommendation the law-enforcement officer or other designated individual shall take the respondent to a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 or release the respondent.
    2. If the physician or eligible psychologist finds that the condition described in subdivision (1) of this subsection does not exist, the respondent shall be released and the proceedings terminated.
  5. The findings of the physician or eligible psychologist and the facts on which they are based shall be in writing in all cases. A copy of the findings shall be sent to the clerk of superior court by the most reliable and expeditious means. If it cannot be reasonably anticipated that the clerk will receive the copy within 48 hours of the time that it was signed, the physician or eligible psychologist shall also communicate his findings to the clerk by telephone.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 4; c. 679, s. 8; c. 739, s. 1; 1979, c. 358, s. 27; c. 915, s. 4; 1983, c. 380, ss. 4, 10; c. 638, ss. 6, 7, 25.1; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, ss. 2, 9; 2018-33, s. 34; 2018-76, s. 3.2(b); 2019-177, s. 7(b); 2021-77, s. 6(c).

Temporary Waiver of Certain Mental Health Commitment Requirements.

Session Laws 2003-178, s. 1, as amended by Session Laws 2006-66, s. 10.27, Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(a), Session Laws 2009-340, s. 3, Session Laws 2010-119, s. 1, and Session Laws 2010-123, s. 4.8, effective July 1, 2003, and expiring October 1, 2012, provides: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services may, upon request of an LME, waive temporarily the requirements of G.S. 122C-261 through G.S. 122C-263 and G.S. 122C-281 through G.S. 122C-283 pertaining to initial (first-level) examinations by a physician or eligible psychologist of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261 (a) or G.S. 122C-281 (a), as applicable, as follows:

“(1) The Secretary has received a request from an LME to substitute for a physician or eligible psychologist, a licensed clinical social worker, a masters level psychiatric nurse, or a masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist to conduct the initial (first-level) examinations of individuals meeting the criteria of G.S. 122C-261(a) or G.S. 122C-281(a). The waiver shall be implemented on a pilot-program basis. The request from the LME shall specifically describe:

“a. How the purpose of the statutory requirement would be better served by waiving the requirement and substituting the proposed change under the waiver.

“b. How the waiver will enable the LME to improve the delivery or management of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services.

“c. How the services to be provided by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under the waiver are within each of these professional’s scope of practice.

“d. How the health, safety, and welfare of individuals will continue to be at least as well protected under the waiver as under the statutory requirement.

“(2) The Secretary shall review the request and may approve it upon finding that:

“a. The request meets the requirements of this section.

“b. The request furthers the purposes of State policy under G.S. 122C-2 and mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services reform.

“c. The request improves the delivery of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services in the counties affected by the waiver and also protects the health, safety, and welfare of individuals receiving these services.

“d. The duties and responsibilities performed by the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist are within the individual’s scope of practice.

“(3) The Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of mental health, developmental disabilities, and substance abuse services and protection of health, safety, and welfare under the waiver. The Secretary shall send a report on the evaluation to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substances Abuse Services by October 1, 2009. The report shall include data gathered from all participating LMEs since the beginning of the pilot.

“(4) The waiver granted by the Secretary under this section shall be in effect until October 1, 2012.

“(5) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section to up to 20 LMEs.

“(6) In no event shall the substitution of a licensed clinical social worker, masters level psychiatric nurse, or masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist under a waiver granted under this section be construed as authorization to expand the scope of practice of the licensed clinical social worker, the masters level psychiatric nurse, or the masters level licensed clinical addictions specialist.

“(7) The Department shall assure that staff performing the duties are trained and privileged to perform the functions identified in the waiver. The Department shall involve stakeholders including, but not limited to, the North Carolina Psychiatric Association, The North Carolina Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers, The North Carolina Substance Abuse Professional Practice Board, North Carolina Psychological Association, The North Carolina Society for Clinical Social Work, and the North Carolina Medical Society in developing required staff competencies.

“(8) The LME shall assure that a physician is available at all times to provide backup support to include telephone consultation and face-to-face evaluation, if necessary.”

Session Laws 2007-504, s. 1.1(b), provides: “The Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (LOC) shall review the report submitted by the Secretary under Section 1.1.(a) of this act. The LOC shall make recommendations to the 2010 Regular Session of the 2009 General Assembly regarding whether to extend the pilot, discontinue the pilot, or make the provisions of the pilot permanent and statewide.”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1985, c. 695, substituted “his” for “physician’s” near the end of the first sentence of subdivision (d)(1). The word “the” preceding “his” probably also should have been deleted by the act and has therefore been bracketed.

This section was amended by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 34 and 2018-76, s. 3.2(b), effective October 1, 2019, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . However, in subsection (a), amendments in each of the acts did not account for the changes made by the other. The first two sentences in subsection (a) have been set out in the form above at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 34, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(c), made the rewriting of subsection (a) of this section by Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(b), effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(c), made the amendment of subsections (a) and (c) of this section by Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(b), effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3A.1(a) provides: “(a) Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply in this Part:

“(1) CDC. — The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“(2) COVID-19. — Coronavirus disease 2019.

“(3) COVID-19 diagnostic test. — A test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to detect the presence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

“(4) COVID-19 emergency. — The period beginning March 10, 2020, and ending on the date the Governor signs an executive order rescinding Executive Order No. 116, Declaration of a State of Emergency to Coordinate Response and Protective Actions to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19.

“(5) COVID-19 antibody test. — A serological blood test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to measure the amount of antibodies or proteins present in the blood when the body is responding to an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3F.1(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The following words have the following meanings in this section:

“(1) Commitment examiner. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(2) Telehealth. — The use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other.

“(3) Qualified professional. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(b) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the first examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-283 (a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of the commitment examiner or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. A commitment examiner who examines a respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-283 (d) would not be different if the examination had been conducted in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. A commitment examiner who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a person authorized to perform examinations under G.S. 122C-283.

“(c) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the second examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-266(a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to mental illness or required by G.S. 122C-285(a) to determine if the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of a physician or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures, provided that the following conditions are met:

“(1) In the case of involuntary commitment due to mental illness, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(3) of G.S. 122C-266 would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the examining physician. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a physician.

“(2) In the case of involuntary commitment due to substance use disorder, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-285(a) would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a qualified professional, as defined in G.S. 122C-3 ; provided that, if the initial commitment examination was performed by a qualified professional, then this face-to-face examination shall be in the presence of a physician.

“(d) This section is effective when it becomes law and expires 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 34, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2018-76, s. 3.2(b), rewrote subsection (a). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-177, s. 7(b), rewrote subsections (a) and (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 6(c), effective July 2, 2021, substituted “telehealth” for “telemedicine” in the second sentence of subsection (a); and added the second through sixth sentences in subsection (c).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

CASE NOTES

Editor’s Note. —

Most of the cases below was decided under former statutory provisions.

Duty of Physician to Make Examination. —

Former G.S. 122-58.4 (see now G.S. 122C-263 and 122C-283) imposed a positive duty to make the examination before signing the certificate. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Physical Presence of Person to Be Examined Required. —

“Examine” requires that the person to be examined be physically in the presence of the qualified physician, so that the physician may actually utilize his five senses, or such of them as he deems necessary, in carrying out the mandate of this section. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

The requirement that the law-enforcement officer must take and present the person to be examined to the physician requires that the person must be physically present before the physician for the purpose of the examination. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Relief from Wrongful Certification. —

A physician’s failure to perform an examination prior to signing certificate is a violation of the statute, and if plaintiff is involuntarily committed as a result of defendant’s actions, a cause of action arises against defendant, and this is true regardless of what may have prompted defendant to fail to make the examination of plaintiff. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

Custody. —

McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160 (1981); Following a first examination, custody continues with law enforcement until the respondent is transferred to a 24-hour facility for the custody and treatment of involuntary clients, or, in cases where commitment is not recommended, returned to a residence and released from custody; the legislature has not seen fit to confer custody of an involuntary commitment respondent on anyone other than law enforcement or other person properly designated prior to and during a first examination. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

Relevance of Reasons for Failing to Examine. —

The reasons defendant physician failed to make the required examination prior to signing certificate were competent on the question of punitive damages, but not on the issue of whether defendant violated his statutory duty to plaintiff. McLean v. Sale, 54 N.C. App. 538, 284 S.E.2d 160, 1981 N.C. App. LEXIS 2931 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 301 , 290 S.E.2d 703, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1405 (1982).

No Special Relationship Imposed Liability. —

Trial court did not commit reversible error in dismissing a family’s negligence complaint because healthcare providers did not have custody of or a legal right to control a patient when conducting their first examination, and thus, no special relationship was created imposing liability; the county sheriff’s department assumed custody of the patient until he was delivered to a 24-hour facility or transported to his home or the home of a consenting individual. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

No Duty to Third Parties. —

When a respondent in an involuntary commitment proceeding is delivered to a hospital for an initial examination to recommend whether commitment is required, neither the examiner nor the hospital obtains custody or a legal right to control the respondent unless and until involuntary commitment is recommended; neither the examiner nor the facility owes a duty to third parties for harm resulting from an examiner’s recommendation, even if the examination failed to comply with statutory requirements. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 255 N.C. App. 39, 804 S.E.2d 214, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 669 (2017).

§ 122C-284. Duties of clerk of superior court.

  1. Upon receipt by the clerk of superior court of a finding made by a commitment examiner or other qualified professional pursuant to G.S. 122C-285(c) that a respondent is a substance abuser and dangerous to self or others and that commitment is recommended, the clerk of superior court of the county where the facility is located, if the respondent is held in a 24-hour facility, or the clerk of superior court where the petition was initiated shall upon direction of a district court judge assign counsel, calendar the matter for hearing, and notify the respondent, the respondent’s counsel, and the petitioner of the time and place of the hearing. The petitioner or respondent, directly, or through counsel, may file a written waiver of the right to notice under this subsection with the clerk of court.
  2. Notice to the respondent required by subsection (a) of this section shall be given as provided in G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 4(j) at least 72 hours before the hearing. Notice to other individuals shall be given by mailing at least 72 hours before the hearing a copy by first-class mail postage prepaid to the individual at his or her last known address. G.S. 1A-1 , Rule 6 shall not apply.
  3. Upon receipt of notice that transportation is necessary to take a committed respondent to a 24-hour facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-290(b) , the clerk shall issue a custody order for the respondent.
  4. The clerk of superior court shall upon the direction of a district court judge calendar all hearings, supplemental hearings, and rehearings and provide all notices required by this Part.

History. 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 5; c. 414, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, s. 5; 1983, c. 380, s. 9; c. 638, s. 8; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 10; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 27; 2018-33, s. 35.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 35, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 35, in subsection (a), in the first sentence, substituted “by the clerk of superior court of a finding made by a commitment examiner or other qualified professional pursuant to G.S. 122C-285(c)” for “of a physician’s or eligible psychologist’s finding” and, in the last sentence, inserted “or respondent, directly, or through counsel”; and made gender neutral changes in subsections (a) and (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-285. Commitment; second examination and treatment pending hearing.

  1. Within 24 hours of arrival at a 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 , the respondent shall be examined by a qualified professional. This professional shall be a physician if the initial commitment evaluation was conducted by a commitment examiner who is not a physician. The examination shall include the assessment specified in G.S. 122C-283(c). If the physician or qualified professional finds that the respondent is a substance abuser and is dangerous to self or others, the physician or qualified professional shall hold and treat the respondent at the facility or designate other treatment pending the district court hearing. If the physician or qualified professional finds that the respondent does not meet the criteria for commitment under G.S. 122C-283(d)(1), the physician or qualified professional shall release the respondent and the proceeding shall be terminated. In this case the reasons for the release shall be reported in writing to the clerk of superior court of the county in which the custody order originated. If the respondent is released, the law enforcement officer or other person designated or required under G.S. 122C-251(g) to provide transportation shall return the respondent to the originating county. (a1) The second examination of a respondent required by subsection (a) of this section to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance abuse may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of a physician or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures, provided that the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth is satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subsection (a) of this section would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. An examining physician who is not so satisfied shall note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent shall be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a qualified professional; provided, however, that if the initial commitment examination was performed by a qualified professional, then this face-to-face examination shall be in the presence of a physician. As used in this section, “telehealth” means the use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other.
  2. If the 24-hour facility described in G.S. 122C-252 is the facility in which the first examination by a commitment examiner occurred and is the same facility in which the respondent is held, the second examination must occur not later than the following regular working day.
  3. The findings of the physician or qualified professional along with a summary of the facts on which they are based shall be made in writing in all cases. A copy of the written findings shall be sent to the clerk of superior court by reliable and expeditious means.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 6; 1979, c. 915, s. 6; 1983, c. 380, s. 5; c. 638, ss. 9, 10; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 11; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 28; 2018-33, s. 36; 2021-77, s. 6(d).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 36, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3A.1(a) provides: “(a) Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply in this Part:

“(1) CDC. — The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“(2) COVID-19. — Coronavirus disease 2019.

“(3) COVID-19 diagnostic test. — A test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to detect the presence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

“(4) COVID-19 emergency. — The period beginning March 10, 2020, and ending on the date the Governor signs an executive order rescinding Executive Order No. 116, Declaration of a State of Emergency to Coordinate Response and Protective Actions to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19.

“(5) COVID-19 antibody test. — A serological blood test the federal Food and Drug Administration has authorized for emergency use or approved to measure the amount of antibodies or proteins present in the blood when the body is responding to an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 3F.1(a)-(d), provides: “(a) The following words have the following meanings in this section:

“(1) Commitment examiner. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(2) Telehealth. — The use of two-way, real-time interactive audio and video where the respondent and commitment examiner can hear and see each other.

“(3) Qualified professional. — As defined in G.S. 122C-3 .

“(b) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the first examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-283 (a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of the commitment examiner or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures. A commitment examiner who examines a respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-283 (d) would not be different if the examination had been conducted in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. A commitment examiner who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a person authorized to perform examinations under G.S. 122C-283.

“(c) Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes or any other provision of law to the contrary, the second examination of a respondent required by G.S. 122C-266(a) to determine whether the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to mental illness or required by G.S. 122C-285(a) to determine if the respondent will be involuntarily committed due to substance use disorder may be conducted either in the physical face-to-face presence of a physician or utilizing telehealth equipment and procedures, provided that the following conditions are met:

“(1) In the case of involuntary commitment due to mental illness, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with subdivisions (a)(1) through (a)(3) of G.S. 122C-266 would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the examining physician. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a physician.

“(2) In the case of involuntary commitment due to substance use disorder, the physician who examines the respondent by means of telehealth must be satisfied to a reasonable medical certainty that the determinations made in accordance with G.S. 122C-285(a) would not be different if the examination had been done in the physical presence of the commitment examiner. An examining physician who is not so satisfied must note that the examination was not satisfactorily accomplished, and the respondent must be taken for a face-to-face examination in the physical presence of a qualified professional, as defined in G.S. 122C-3 ; provided that, if the initial commitment examination was performed by a qualified professional, then this face-to-face examination shall be in the presence of a physician.

“(d) This section is effective when it becomes law and expires 30 days after Executive Order No. 116 is rescinded.”

Session Laws 2020-3, s. 5, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 36, rewrote subsection (a); substituted “commitment examiner” for “physician or eligible psychologist” in the middle of subsection (b); and added subsection (c). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2021-77, s. 6(d), effective July 2, 2021, added subsection (a1).

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 administrative law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1185 (1980).

§ 122C-286. Commitment; district court hearing.

  1. A hearing shall be held in district court within 10 days of the day the respondent is taken into custody. If a respondent temporarily detained under G.S. 122C-263(d)(2) is subject to a series of successive custody orders issued pursuant to G.S. 122C-263(d)(2), the hearing shall be held within 10 days after the day the respondent is taken into custody under the most recent custody order. Upon its own motion or upon motion of the responsible professional, the respondent, or the State, the court may grant a continuance of not more than five days.
  2. The respondent shall be present at the hearing unless the respondent, through counsel, submits a written waiver of personal appearance. A subpoena may be issued to compel the respondent’s presence at a hearing. The petitioner and the responsible professional of the area facility or the proposed treating physician or a designee of the proposed treating physician may be present and may provide testimony.
  3. Certified copies of reports and findings of physicians, psychologists, and other commitment examiners and medical records of previous and current treatment are admissible in evidence, but the respondent’s right to confront and cross-examine witnesses shall not be denied.
  4. The respondent may be represented by counsel of choice. If the respondent is indigent within the meaning of G.S. 7A-450 , counsel shall be appointed to represent the respondent in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.
  5. Hearings may be held at a facility if it is located within the judge’s district court district as defined in G.S. 7A-133 or in the judge’s chambers. A hearing may not be held in a regular courtroom, over objection of the respondent, if in the discretion of a judge a more suitable place is available.
  6. The hearing shall be closed to the public unless the respondent requests otherwise. The hearing for a respondent being held at a 24-hour facility shall be held in a location and in the manner provided in G.S. 122C-268(g).
  7. A copy of all documents admitted into evidence and a transcript of the proceedings shall be furnished to the respondent on request by the clerk upon the direction of a district court judge. If the respondent is indigent, the copies shall be provided at State expense.
  8. To support a commitment order, the court shall find by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-283(d)(1). The court shall record the facts that support its findings and shall show on the order the area facility or physician who is responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s treatment.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 8; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, ss. 29, 30; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1037, s. 117; 2000-144, s. 43; 2018-33, s. 37.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 37, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 37, in subsection (a), added the second sentence; in subsection (b), in the first sentence, added “unless the respondent, through counsel, submits a written waiver of personal appearance” and in the last sentence, substituted “facility or the proposed treating physician or a designee of the proposed treating physician” for “authority or the proposed treating physician or his designee”; in subsection (c), substituted “physicians, psychologists, and other commitment examiners” for “physicians and psychologists”; in subsection (f), added the last sentence; and, in subsection (h), substituted “area facility” for “area authority” in the last sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-286.1. Venue of district court hearing when respondent held at a 24-hour facility pending hearing.

  1. In all cases where the respondent is held at a 24-hour facility pending the district court hearing as provided in G.S. 122C-286 , unless the respondent through counsel objects to the venue, the hearing shall be held in the county in which the facility is located. Upon objection to venue, the hearing shall be held in the county where the petition was initiated.
  2. An official of the facility shall immediately notify the clerk of superior court of the county in which the facility is located of a determination to hold the respondent pending hearing. That clerk shall request transmittal of all documents pertinent to the proceedings from the clerk of superior court where the proceedings were initiated. The requesting clerk shall assume all duties set forth in G.S. 122C-284 . The counsel provided for in G.S. 122C-286(d) shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.

History. 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 31; 2000-144, s. 44.

Cross References.

For the Indigent Defense Services Act, see Chapter 7A, Subchapter IX, Article 39B.

§ 122C-287. Disposition.

The court may make one of the following dispositions:

  1. If the court finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is a substance abuser and is dangerous to self or others, it shall order for a period not in excess of 180 days commitment to and treatment by an area facility or physician who is responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s commitment and treatment. Before ordering commitment to and treatment by an area facility or a physician who is not a physician at an inpatient facility, the court shall follow the procedures specified in G.S. 122C-271(a)(3) and G.S. 122C-271(b)(4), as applicable.
  2. If the court finds that the respondent does not meet the commitment criteria set out in subdivision (1) of this subsection, the respondent shall be discharged and the facility in which he was last treated so notified.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 8; c. 739, s. 2; 1979, c. 358, s. 26; c. 915, ss. 8, 15, 16; 1981, c. 537, s. 1; 1983, c. 380, s. 8; c. 638, s. 14; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 38.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 38, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 38, in subdivision (1), in the first sentence, substituted “to self” for “to himself” and “area facility” for “area authority” and added the last sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

CASE NOTES

Only those persons found to be substance abusers and dangerous to themselves or others are entitled to the services of a facility. In re Royal, 128 N.C. App. 645, 495 S.E.2d 404, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 153 (1998).

§ 122C-288. Appeal.

Judgment of the district court is final. Appeal may be had to the Court of Appeals by the State or by any party on the record as in civil cases. Appeal does not stay the commitment unless so ordered by the Court of Appeals. The Attorney General shall represent the State’s interest on appeal. The district court retains limited jurisdiction for the purpose of hearing all reviews, rehearings, or supplemental hearings allowed or required under this Part.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1979, c. 915, s. 19; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1980 law on civil procedure, see 59 N.C.L. Rev. 1049 (1981).

§ 122C-289. Duty of assigned counsel; discharge.

If the respondent is committed, assigned counsel remains responsible for the respondent’s representation at the trial level until discharged by order of district court or until the respondent is otherwise unconditionally discharged. If the respondent appeals, counsel for the appeal shall be appointed in accordance with rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense Services.

History. 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2006-264, s. 61(b).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2006-264, s. 61(b), effective October 1, 2006, and applicable to appeals filed on or after that date, rewrote the section.

§ 122C-290. Duties for follow-up on commitment order.

  1. The area facility or physician responsible for management and supervision of the respondent’s commitment and treatment may prescribe or administer to the respondent reasonable and appropriate treatment either on an outpatient basis or in a 24-hour facility.
  2. If the respondent whose treatment is provided on an outpatient basis fails to comply with all or part of the prescribed treatment after reasonable effort to solicit the respondent’s compliance or whose treatment is provided on an inpatient basis is discharged in accordance with G.S. 122C-205.1(b), the area facility or physician may request the clerk or magistrate to order the respondent taken into custody for the purpose of examination. Upon receipt of this request, the clerk or magistrate shall issue an order to a law enforcement officer to take the respondent into custody and to take him immediately to the designated area facility or physician for examination. The custody order is valid throughout the State. The law enforcement officer shall turn the respondent over to the custody of the physician or area facility who shall conduct the examination and release the respondent or have the respondent taken to a 24-hour facility upon a determination that treatment in the facility will benefit the respondent. Transportation to the 24-hour facility shall be provided as specified in G.S. 122C-251 , upon notice to the clerk or magistrate that transportation is necessary, or as provided in G.S. 122C-408(b) . If placement in a 24-hour facility is to exceed 45 consecutive days, the area facility or physician shall notify the clerk of court by the 30th day and request a supplemental hearing as specified in G.S. 122C-291 .
  3. If the respondent intends to move or moves to another county within the State, the area facility or physician shall notify the clerk of court in the county where the commitment is being supervised and request that a supplemental hearing be calendared.
  4. If the respondent moves to another state or to an unknown location, the designated area facility or physician shall notify the clerk of superior court of the county where the commitment is supervised and the commitment shall be terminated.

History. 1983, c. 638, s. 16; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 863, s. 32; 1987, c. 674, s. 2; c. 750; 2004-23, s. 2(c); 2018-33, s. 39.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 39, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2004-23, s. 2(c), effective June 25, 2004, inserted the third sentence in subsection (b).

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 39, substituted “area facility” for “area authority” throughout the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-291. Supplemental hearings.

  1. Upon receipt of a request for a supplemental hearing, the clerk shall calendar a hearing to be held within 14 days and notify, at least 72 hours before the hearing, the petitioner, the respondent, his attorney, if any, and the designated area facility or physician. Notice shall be provided in accordance with G.S. 122C-284(b). The procedures for the hearing shall follow G.S. 122C-286 .
  2. At the supplemental hearing for a respondent who has moved or may move to another county, the court shall determine if the respondent meets the criteria for commitment set out in G.S. 122C-283(d)(1). If the court determines that the respondent no longer meets the criteria for commitment, it shall discharge the respondent from the order and dismiss the case. If the court determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria for commitment, it shall continue the commitment but shall designate an area facility or physician at the respondent’s new residence to be responsible for the management or supervision of the respondent’s commitment. The court shall order the respondent to appear for treatment at the address of the newly designated area facility or physician and shall order venue for further court proceedings under the commitment to be transferred to the new county of supervision. Upon an order changing venue, the clerk of court in the county where the commitment has been supervised shall transfer the records regarding the commitment to the clerk of court in the county where the commitment will be supervised. Also, the clerk of court in the county where the commitment has been supervised shall send a copy of the court’s order directing the continuation of treatment under new supervision to the newly designated area facility or physician.
  3. At a supplemental hearing for a respondent to be held longer than 45 consecutive days in a 24-hour facility, the court shall determine if the respondent meets the criteria for commitment set out in G.S. 122C-283(d)(1). If the court determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria and that further treatment in the 24-hour facility is necessary, the court may authorize continued care in the facility for not more than 90 days, after which a rehearing for the purpose of determining the need for continued care in the 24-hour facility shall be held, or the court may order the respondent released from the 24-hour facility and continued on the commitment on an outpatient basis. If the court determines that the respondent no longer meets the criteria for commitment the respondent shall be released and his case dismissed.
  4. At any time during the term of commitment order, a respondent may apply to the court for a supplemental hearing for the purpose of discharge from the order. The application shall be made in writing to the clerk of superior court. At the supplemental hearing the court shall determine whether the respondent continues to meet the criteria for commitment. The court may reissue or change the commitment order or discharge the respondent and dismiss the case.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 40.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 40, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 40, substituted “area facility” for “area authority” in subsections (a) and (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-292. Rehearings.

  1. Fifteen days before the end of the initial or subsequent periods of commitment if the area facility or physician determines that the respondent continues to meet the criteria specified in G.S. 122C-283(d)(1), the clerk of superior court of the county where commitment is supervised shall be notified. The clerk, at least 10 days before the end of the commitment period, on order of the district court, shall calendar the rehearing. If the respondent no longer meets the criteria, the area facility or physician shall so notify the clerk who shall dismiss the case.
  2. Rehearings are governed by the same notice and procedures as initial hearings, and the respondent has the same rights that were available to the respondent at the initial hearing including the right to appeal.
  3. If the court finds that the respondent no longer meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-283(d)(1), it shall unconditionally discharge him. A copy of the discharge order shall be furnished by the clerk to the designated area facility or physician. If the respondent continues to meet the criteria of G.S. 122C-283(d)(1), the court may order commitment for additional periods not in excess of 365 days each.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 400, s. 9; 1979, c. 915, ss. 9, 17; 1981, c. 537, ss. 2-4; 1983, c. 638, ss. 18-19; 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 41.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 41, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 41, substituted “area facility” for “area authority” throughout the section; and substituted “that were available to the respondent” for “he had” in the middle of subsection (b). For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. J. Laird Jacob, Jr., Broughton Hospital, 44 N.C.A.G. 33 (1974), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-293. Release by area facility or physician.

The area facility or physician as designated in the order shall discharge a committed respondent unconditionally at any time the physician determines that the respondent no longer meets the criteria of G.S. 122C-283(d)(1). Notice of discharge and the reasons for the release shall be reported in writing to the clerk of superior court of the county in which the commitment was ordered.

History. 1973, c. 726, s. 1; c. 1408, s. 1; 1981, c. 537, s. 5; 1983, c. 383, s. 6; c. 638, s. 21; c. 864, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 42.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 42, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 42, in the section heading and in the first sentence, substituted “area facility” for “area authority”; and substituted “the physician determines” for “he determines” in the middle of the first sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

§ 122C-294. Local plan and data submission.

  1. The “local area crisis services plans” adopted in accordance with G.S. 122C-202.2 and G.S. 122C-251(g) shall be submitted to the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services beginning October 1, 2019, but no later than August 1, 2020. If the area authority modifies any plan, the modified plan shall be submitted to the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services at least 10 days prior to the effective date of the new plan.
  2. The Department shall provide the data collected by the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services concerning the number of respondents receiving treatment under involuntary commitment in designated facilities to the Fiscal Research Division and the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee for Health and Human Services on October 1 of each year beginning in 2019 and any other time upon request.

History. 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1977, c. 679, s. 8; 1979, c. 358, ss. 26, 27; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2018-33, s. 43; 2019-240, s. 26(i).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 46, made the amendment of this section by Session Laws 2018-33, s. 43, effective October 1, 2019, and applicable to proceedings initiated on or after that date.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2018-33, s. 43, rewrote the section. For effective date and applicability, see editor’s note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 26(i), effective November 6, 2019, in the first sentence of subsection (a), substituted “ ‘local area crisis services plans’ adopted” for “local plan,” substituted “beginning” for “on or before” and inserted “but no later than August 1, 2020” at the end, and substituted “any plan” for “the plan” in the second sentence.

§§ 122C-295 through 122C-300.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 9. Public Intoxication.

§ 122C-301. Assistance to an individual who is intoxicated in public; procedure for commitment to shelter or facility.

  1. An officer may assist an individual found intoxicated in a public place by taking any of the following actions:
    1. The officer may direct or transport the intoxicated individual home;
    2. The officer may direct or transport the intoxicated individual to the residence of another individual willing to accept him;
    3. If the intoxicated individual is apparently in need of and apparently unable to provide for himself food, clothing, or shelter but is not apparently in need of immediate medical care, the officer may direct or transport him to an appropriate public or private shelter facility;
    4. If the intoxicated individual is apparently in need of but apparently unable to provide for himself immediate medical care, the officer may direct or transport him to an area facility, hospital, or physician’s office; or the officer may direct or transport the individual to any other appropriate health care facility; or
    5. If the intoxicated individual is apparently a substance abuser and is apparently dangerous to himself or others, the officer may proceed as provided in Part 8 of this Article.
  2. In providing the assistance authorized by subsection (a) of this section, the officer may use reasonable force to restrain the intoxicated individual if it appears necessary to protect himself, the intoxicated individual, or others. No officer may be held criminally or civilly liable for assault, false imprisonment, or other torts or crimes on account of reasonable measures taken under authority of this Part.
  3. If the officer takes the action described in either subdivision (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section, the facility to which the intoxicated individual is taken may detain him only until he becomes sober or a maximum of 24 hours. The individual may stay a longer period if he wishes to do so and the facility is able to accommodate him.
  4. Any individual who has knowledge that a person assisted to a shelter or other facility under subdivisions (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section is a substance abuser and is dangerous to himself or others may proceed as provided in Part 8 of this Article.

History. 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1134, s. 2; 1981, c. 519, s. 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Governmental Unit Not Assuming Responsibility for Payment of Medical Care. —

Former G.S. 122-65.11 did not suggest that the governmental unit employing an officer who acted pursuant to the statute assumed responsibility for payment for the medical care rendered to the intoxicated person. Craven County Hosp. Corp. v. Lenoir County, 75 N.C. App. 453, 331 S.E.2d 690, 1985 N.C. App. LEXIS 3700 (1985).

Limited Immunity in Dealing with Intoxicated Individuals. —

When officers deal with publicly intoxicated individuals, the legislature has immunized them from civil and criminal liability only if the officers use reasonable measures under this section: such limited immunity would be unnecessary if an individual’s intoxication always constituted contributory negligence. Klassette ex rel. Klassette v. Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Auth., 88 N.C. App. 495, 364 S.E.2d 179, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 75 (1988).

No Exception to the General Public Duty Doctrine Created. —

Neither G.S. 122C-2 nor this section expressly authorizes a private right of action for the breach of its terms or imposes an affirmative duty on an officer beyond the public duty doctrine. Lane v. City of Kinston, 142 N.C. App. 622, 544 S.E.2d 810, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 178 (2001).

Public Duty Doctrine Barred Negligence Per Se Claim. —

Trial court erred in denying a city’s motion for summary judgment in a wife’s action alleging negligence per se, arguing that police officers violated G.S. 122C-301 by failing to assist a person believed to be intoxicated because the public duty doctrine applied to bar the wife’s negligence per se claim; the statute was inapplicable because the officers determined that the wife’s husband was not intoxicated. Scott v. City of Charlotte, 203 N.C. App. 460, 691 S.E.2d 747, 2010 N.C. App. LEXIS 645 (2010).

§ 122C-302. Cities and counties may employ officers to assist intoxicated individuals.

A city or county may employ officers to assist individuals who are intoxicated in public. Officers employed for this purpose shall be trained to give assistance to those who are intoxicated in public including the administration of first aid. An officer employed by a city or county to assist intoxicated individuals has the powers and duties set out in G.S. 122C-301 within the same territory in which criminal laws are enforced by law-enforcement officers of that city or county.

History. 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1134, s. 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-303. Use of jail for care for intoxicated individual.

In addition to the actions authorized by G.S. 122C-301(a) , an officer may assist an individual found intoxicated in a public place by directing or transporting that individual to a city or county jail. That action may be taken only if the intoxicated individual is apparently in need of and apparently unable to provide for himself food, clothing, or shelter but is not apparently in need of immediate medical care and if no other facility is readily available to receive him. The officer and employees of the jail are exempt from liability as provided in G.S. 122C-301(b) . The intoxicated individual may be detained at the jail only until he becomes sober or a maximum of 24 hours and may be released at any time to a relative or other individual willing to be responsible for his care.

History. 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1134, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

CASE NOTES

Arrest. —

There was no plain error in failing to instruct a jury on defendant’s right to resist an unlawful arrest because, while an attempt to take defendant to detox against defendant’s will was an arrest, an officer had objective probable cause to arrest defendant for second degree trespass when defendant remained at an apartment complex after the officer, with authority, instructed defendant to leave, even though defendant was not arrested for that offense. State v. Burwell, 256 N.C. App. 722, 808 S.E.2d 583, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 1024 (2017).

§§ 122C-304 through 122C-310.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 10. Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitments and Discharges, Inmates and Parolees, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

§ 122C-311. Individuals on parole. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

Any individual who has been released from any correctional facility on parole is admitted, committed and discharged from facilities in accordance with the procedures specified in this Article for other individuals.

History. 1959, c. 1002, s. 24; 1963, c. 1184, s. 28; 1973, c. 253, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1(h), effective January 1, 2012, substituted “Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety” for “Department of Correction” in the part heading.

§ 122C-312. Voluntary admissions and discharges of inmates of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

Inmates in the custody of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety may seek voluntary admission to State facilities for the mentally ill or substance abusers. The provisions of Part 2 of this Article shall apply except that an admission may be accomplished only when the Secretary and the Secretary of Public Safety jointly agree to the inmate’s request. When an inmate is admitted he shall be discharged in accordance with the provisions of Part 2 of this Article except that an inmate who is ready for discharge, but still under a term of incarceration, shall be discharged only to an official of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety. The Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety is responsible for the security and cost of transporting inmates to and from facilities under the provisions of this section.

History. 1979, c. 547; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h), (i); 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in the section heading and throughout the section.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 criminal law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1350 (1980).

§ 122C-313. Inmate becoming mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. An inmate who becomes mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others after incarceration in any facility operated by the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety in the State is processed in accordance with Part 7 of this Article, as modified by this section, except when the provisions of Part 7 are manifestly inappropriate. A staff psychiatrist or eligible psychologist of the correctional facility shall execute the affidavit required by G.S. 122C-261 and send it to the clerk of superior court of the county in which the correctional facility is located. Upon receipt of the affidavit, the clerk shall calendar a district court hearing and notify the respondent and his counsel as required by G.S. 122C-284(a). The hearing is conducted in a district courtroom. If the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others, he shall order him transferred for treatment to a State facility designated by the Secretary. The judge shall not order outpatient commitment for an inmate-respondent.
  2. If the sentence of an inmate-respondent expires while he is committed to a State facility, he is considered in all respects as if he had been initially committed under Part 7 of this Article.
  3. If the sentence of an inmate-respondent has not expired, and if in the opinion of the attending physician of the State facility an inmate-respondent ceases to be mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others, he shall notify the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety which shall arrange for the inmate-respondent’s return to a correctional facility.
  4. Special counsel at a State facility shall represent any inmate who becomes mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others while confined in a correctional facility in the same county, otherwise counsel is assigned in accordance with G.S. 122C-270(d).
  5. The Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety is responsible for the security and cost of transporting inmates to and from State facilities under the provisions of this section.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 66; Rev., s. 4619; C.S., s. 6238; 1923, c. 165, s. 55; 1945, c. 952, s. 55; 1955, c. 887, s. 14; 1957, c. 1232, s. 26; 1963, c. 1184, s. 27; 1965, c. 800, s. 13; 1973, c. 253, s. 3; c. 1433; 1977, c. 679, s. 8; 1979, c. 358, s. 27; c. 915, s. 11; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout the section.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Convict Committed to Hospital for Mentally Ill May Be Paroled from Department of Correction Commitment. See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. Wade E. Brown, N.C. Board of Paroles, 41 N.C.A.G. 550 (1971), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§§ 122C-314 through 122C-320. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 10. Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitments and Discharges, Inmates and Parolees, Department of Adult Correction. [Effective January 1, 2023]

§ 122C-311. Individuals on parole. [Effective January 1, 2023]

Any individual who has been released from any correctional facility on parole is admitted, committed and discharged from facilities in accordance with the procedures specified in this Article for other individuals.

History. 1959, c. 1002, s. 24; 1963, c. 1184, s. 28; 1973, c. 253, s. 4; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1(h), effective January 1, 2012, substituted “Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety” for “Department of Correction” in the part heading.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ppp), rewrote the Part 10 heading, which formerly read: “Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitments and Discharges, Inmates and Parolees, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety.” For effective date and applicability see note below.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendment to the Part 10 heading by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(ppp), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

§ 122C-312. Voluntary admissions and discharges of inmates of the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction [Effective January 1, 2023]

Inmates in the custody of the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction may seek voluntary admission to State facilities for the mentally ill or substance abusers. The provisions of Part 2 of this Article shall apply except that an admission may be accomplished only when the Secretary and the Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction jointly agree to the inmate’s request. When an inmate is admitted he shall be discharged in accordance with the provisions of Part 2 of this Article except that an inmate who is ready for discharge, but still under a term of incarceration, shall be discharged only to an official of the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction. The Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction is responsible for the security and cost of transporting inmates to and from facilities under the provisions of this section.

History. 1979, c. 547; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h), (i); 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(o), (p).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(o), (p) effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in the section heading and throughout the section.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(o), (p), substituted “Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Secretary of Public Safety” in the second sentence, and “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in the section heading, and in the first, third and last sentences. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

Legal Periodicals.

For survey of 1979 criminal law, see 58 N.C.L. Rev. 1350 (1980).

§ 122C-313. Inmate becoming mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. An inmate who becomes mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others after incarceration in any facility operated by the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction in the State is processed in accordance with Part 7 of this Article, as modified by this section, except when the provisions of Part 7 are manifestly inappropriate. A staff psychiatrist or eligible psychologist of the correctional facility shall execute the affidavit required by G.S. 122C-261 and send it to the clerk of superior court of the county in which the correctional facility is located. Upon receipt of the affidavit, the clerk shall calendar a district court hearing and notify the respondent and his counsel as required by G.S. 122C-284(a). The hearing is conducted in a district courtroom. If the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others, he shall order him transferred for treatment to a State facility designated by the Secretary. The judge shall not order outpatient commitment for an inmate-respondent.
  2. If the sentence of an inmate-respondent expires while he is committed to a State facility, he is considered in all respects as if he had been initially committed under Part 7 of this Article.
  3. If the sentence of an inmate-respondent has not expired, and if in the opinion of the attending physician of the State facility an inmate-respondent ceases to be mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others, he shall notify the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction which shall arrange for the inmate-respondent’s return to a correctional facility.
  4. Special counsel at a State facility shall represent any inmate who becomes mentally ill and dangerous to himself or others while confined in a correctional facility in the same county, otherwise counsel is assigned in accordance with G.S. 122C-270(d).
  5. The Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction is responsible for the security and cost of transporting inmates to and from State facilities under the provisions of this section.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 66; Rev., s. 4619; C.S., s. 6238; 1923, c. 165, s. 55; 1945, c. 952, s. 55; 1955, c. 887, s. 14; 1957, c. 1232, s. 26; 1963, c. 1184, s. 27; 1965, c. 800, s. 13; 1973, c. 253, s. 3; c. 1433; 1977, c. 679, s. 8; 1979, c. 358, s. 27; c. 915, s. 11; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; c. 695, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(ppppp), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout the section.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in subsections (a), (c) and (e). For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Convict Committed to Hospital for Mentally Ill May Be Paroled from Department of Correction Commitment. See opinion of Attorney General to Mr. Wade E. Brown, N.C. Board of Paroles, 41 N.C.A.G. 550 (1971), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§§ 122C-314 through 122C-320. [Effective January 1, 2023]

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 11. Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitments and Discharges, the Psychiatric Service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill.

§ 122C-321. Voluntary admissions and discharges.

Any individual in need of treatment for mental illness or substance abuse may seek voluntary admission to the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill. Procedures for admission and discharge shall be made in accordance with Parts 2 through 4 of this Article. The applicant may be admitted only upon the approval of the director of the psychiatric service or his designee.

History. 1955, c. 1274, s. 2; 1963, c. 1184, s. 2; 1973, c. 723, s. 3; c. 1084; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 141, s. 14.

§ 122C-322. Involuntary commitments.

  1. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section references in Parts 6 through 8 of this Article to 24-hour facilities, outpatient treatment centers, or area authorities, or private facilities shall include the psychiatric service of the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill. The psychiatric service may be used for temporary detention pending a district court hearing, for commitment of the respondent after the hearing, or as the manager and supervisor of outpatient commitment. However, no individual may be held at or committed to the psychiatric service without the prior approval of the director of the psychiatric service or his designee.
  2. Initial hearings, supplemental hearings, and rehearings may be held at the psychiatric service facility or at any place in Orange County where district court can be held under G.S. 7A-133 . Legal counsel for the respondent at all hearings and rehearings shall be assigned from among the members of the bar of the same county in accordance with G.S. 122C-270(d).

History. 1977, c. 738, s. 1; 1981, c. 442; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1989, c. 141, s. 15.

Legal Periodicals.

For article, “One Size Only Fits Some: Presuming Custody for the Involuntarily Committed,” see 97 N.C.L. Rev. 1014 (2019).

CASE NOTES

Those who are intoxicated but not disruptive may be assisted but not arrested. State v. Cooke, 49 N.C. App. 384, 271 S.E.2d 561, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3383 (1980) (decided under former statutory provisions).

§§ 122C-323 through 122C-330.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 12. Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitments and Discharges, Veterans Administration Facilities.

§ 122C-331. Voluntary admissions and discharges.

Veterans in need of treatment for mental illness or substance abuse may seek voluntary admission to a facility operated by the Veterans Administration. Procedures for admission and discharge shall be made in accordance with Parts 2 and 4 of this Article. The Veterans Administration may require additional procedures not inconsistent with these Parts.

History. 1973, c. 1408, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-332. Involuntary commitments.

  1. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section, references in Parts 6 through 8 of this Article to 24-hour facilities, outpatient treatment centers, or area authorities, or private facilities shall include the facilities operated by the Veterans Administration. Veterans Administration facilities may be used for temporary detention pending a district court hearing, for commitment of the respondent after the hearing, or as the manager and supervisor of outpatient commitment. Eligibility of the veteran-respondent for treatment at a Veterans Administration facility and the availability of space shall be determined by the Veterans Administration in all cases before sending or committing a veteran-respondent.
  2. Initial hearings, supplemental hearings, and rehearings for veteran-respondents may be held at the facility or at the county courthouse in the county in which the facility is located, and counsel shall be assigned from among the members of the bar of the same county in accordance with G.S. 122C-270(d).

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-333. Order of another state.

The judgment or order of commitment by a court of competent jurisdiction of another state, committing a person to the Veterans Administration or another federal agency that is located in this State shall have the same force and effect on the committed person while in this State as in the jurisdiction of the court entering the judgment or making the order. The courts of the committing state shall retain jurisdiction of the person so committed for the purpose of inquiring into the mental condition of the person, and for determining the necessity for continuance of his restraint. Consent is given to the application of the law of the committing state on the authority of the chief officer of any facility of the Veterans Administration or of any institution operated in this State by any other federal agency to retain custody, transfer, parole, or discharge the committed person.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-334 through 122C-340.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 13. Voluntary Admissions, Involuntary Commitment and Discharge of Non-State Residents and the Return of North Carolina Resident Clients.

§ 122C-341. Determination of residence.

It is the responsibility of the facility to determine if a client is not a resident of the State.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 18; Rev., ss. 3591, 4587, 4588; C.S., ss. 6187, 6188; 1945, c. 952, ss. 16, 17; 1947, c. 537, s. 11; 1953, c. 256, s. 3; 1957, c. 1386; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1973, c. 673, s. 13; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-342. Voluntary admissions and discharges.

A non-State resident may be admitted to and discharged from a facility on a voluntary basis in accordance with Parts 2 through 5 of this Article at his own expense. If the facility determines that the client should be returned to his own state the provisions of G.S. 122C-345 or G.S. 122C-361 , as appropriate, shall apply.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 16; Rev., s. 4584; C.S., s. 6210; 1945, c. 952, s. 33; 1947, c. 537, s. 18; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1971, c. 1140; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 13; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-343. Involuntary commitments.

Involuntary commitments of non-State residents are made under the provisions of Parts 6 through 8 of this Article. If after commitment to a 24-hour facility the facility determines that the respondent needs long-term care and should be returned to his state of residence, the provisions of G.S. 122C-345 or G.S. 122C-361 , as appropriate, shall apply.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 16; Rev., s. 4584; C.S., s. 6210; 1945, c. 952, s. 33; 1947, c. 537, s. 18; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1971, c. 1140; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 13; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-344. Citizens of other countries.

In addition to the provisions of G.S. 122C-341 through G.S. 122C-343 , if a 24-hour facility determines that a client is not a citizen of the United States, the facility shall notify the Governor of this State of the name of the client, the country and place of his residence in the country and other facts in the case as can be obtained, together with a copy of pertinent medical records. The Governor shall send the information to the nearest consular office of the committed foreign national, with the request that the consular office tell the minister resident or plenipotentiary of the country of which the client is alleged to be a citizen.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 16; Rev., s. 4585; C.S., s. 6211; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 561, s. 86(a).

§ 122C-345. Return of a non-State resident client to his resident state.

  1. Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, it is the responsibility of the director of a facility to arrange for the transfer of a client to his resident state. The cost of returning the client to his resident state is the responsibility of the client or his family.
  2. A non-State resident client of an area 24-hour facility may be transferred to a State facility in accordance with G.S. 122C-206 in order for the client to be returned to his resident state.
  3. A non-State resident client of a State facility may be returned to his resident state under procedures established under G.S. 122C-346 or G.S. 122C-361 . The cost of returning a client to his resident state under this subsection shall be the responsibility of the State.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 16; Rev., s. 4584; C.S., s. 6210; 1945, c. 952, s. 33; 1947, c. 537, ss. 18, 20; 1955, c. 887, s. 13; 1959, c. 1002, s. 22; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1971, c. 1140; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 13; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-346. Authority of the Secretary to enter reciprocal agreements.

The Secretary may enter agreements with other states for the return of non-State resident clients to their resident state and for the return of North Carolina residents to North Carolina when under treatment in another state.

History. 1947, c. 537, s. 20; 1955, c. 887, s. 13; 1959, c. 1002, s. 22; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-347. Return of North Carolina resident clients from other states.

North Carolina residents who are in treatment in another state may be returned to North Carolina either under an agreement authorized in G.S. 122C-346 or under the provisions of G.S. 122C-361 . The cost of returning a North Carolina resident to this State is the responsibility of the sending state. Within 72 hours after admission in a State facility, a returned resident shall be evaluated. The returned resident may agree to a voluntary admission or may be released, or proceedings for an involuntary commitment under this Article may be initiated as necessary by the responsible professional in the facility.

History. 1945, c. 952, s. 34; 1947, c. 537, s. 19; 1959, c. 1002, ss. 20, 21; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1965, c. 800, s. 9; 1969, c. 982; 1973, c. 476, ss. 133, 138; c. 673, s. 13; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-348. Residency not affected.

  1. A nonresident of this State who is under care in a 24-hour facility in this State is not considered a resident. No length of time spent in this State while a client in a 24-hour facility is sufficient to make a nonresident a resident or entitled to care or treatment.
  2. A North Carolina resident who is under care and treatment in a 24-hour facility in another state shall retain his residency in North Carolina.

History. 1899, c. 1, s. 18; Rev., ss. 3591, 4587, 4588; C.S., ss. 6187, 6188; 1945, c. 952, ss. 16, 17; 1947, c. 537, ss. 11, 20; 1953, c. 256, s. 3; 1955, c. 887, s. 13; 1957, c. 1386; 1959, c. 1002, s. 22; 1963, c. 1184, s. 1; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; c. 673, s. 13; 1977, c. 679, s. 7; 1981, c. 51, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-349 through 122C-360.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 14. Interstate Compact on Mental Health.

§ 122C-361. Compact entered into; form of Compact.

The Interstate Compact on Mental Health is hereby enacted into law and entered into by this State with all other states legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows: The contracting states solemnly agree that:

ARTICLE I.

The party states find that the proper and expeditious treatment of the mentally ill and mentally deficient can be facilitated by cooperative action, to the benefit of the patients, their families, and society as a whole. Further, the party states find that the necessity of and desirability for furnishing such care and treatment bears no primary relation to the residence or citizenship of the patient but, that, on the contrary, the controlling factors of community safety and humanitarianism require that facilities and services be made available for all who are in need of them. Consequently, it is the purpose of this Compact and of the party states to provide the necessary legal basis for the institutionalization or other appropriate care and treatment of the mentally ill and mentally deficient under a system that recognizes the paramount importance of patient welfare and to establish the responsibilities of the party states in term of such welfare.

ARTICLE II.

As used in this Compact:

  1. “Sending state” shall mean a party state from which a patient is transported pursuant to the provisions of the Compact or from which it is contemplated that a patient may be so sent.
  2. “Receiving state” shall mean a party state to which a patient is transported pursuant to the provisions of the Compact or to which it is contemplated that a patient may be so sent.
  3. “Institution” shall mean any hospital or other facility maintained by a party state or political subdivision thereof for the care and treatment of mental illness or mental deficiency.
  4. “Patient” shall mean any person subject to or eligible as determined by the laws of the sending state, for institutionalization or other care, treatment, or supervision pursuant to the provisions of this Compact.
  5. “Aftercare” shall mean care, treatment and services provided a patient, as defined herein, on convalescent status or conditional release.
  6. “Mental illness” shall mean mental disease to such extent that a person so afflicted requires care and treatment for his own welfare, or the welfare of others, or of the community.
  7. “Mental deficiency” shall mean mental deficiency as defined by appropriate clinical authorities to such extent that a person so afflicted is incapable of managing himself and his affairs, but shall not include mental illness as defined herein.
  8. “State” shall mean any state, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

    ARTICLE III.

    (a) Whenever a person physically present in any party state shall be in need of institutionalization by reason of mental illness or mental deficiency, he shall be eligible for care and treatment in an institution in that state irrespective of his residence, settlement or citizenship qualifications.

    (b) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this Article to the contrary notwithstanding, any patient may be transferred to an institution in another state whenever there are factors based upon clinical determinations indicating that the care and treatment of said patient would be facilitated or improved thereby. Any such institutionalization may be for the entire period of care and treatment or for any portion or portions thereof. The factors referred to in this paragraph shall include the patient’s full record with due regard for the location of the patient’s family, character of the illness and probable duration thereof, and such other factors as shall be considered appropriate.

    (c) No state shall be obliged to receive any patient pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this Article unless the sending state has given advance notice of its intention to send the patient; furnished all available medical and other pertinent records concerning the patient; given the qualified medical or other appropriate clinical authorities of the receiving state an opportunity to examine the patient if said authorities so wish; and unless the receiving state shall agree to accept the patient.

    (d) In the event that the laws of the receiving state establish a system of priorities for the admission of patients, an interstate patient under this Compact shall receive the same priority as a local patient and shall be taken in the same order and at the same time that it would be taken if he were a local patient.

    (e) Pursuant to this Compact, the determination as to the suitable place of institutionalization for a patient may be reviewed at any time and such further transfer of the patient may be made as seems likely to be in the best interest of the patient.

    ARTICLE IV.

    (a) Whenever, pursuant to the laws of the state in which a patient is physically present, it shall be determined that the patient should receive aftercare or supervision, such care or supervision may be provided in a receiving state. If the medical or other appropriate clinical authorities have responsibility for the care and treatment of the patient in the sending state shall have reason to believe that aftercare in another state would be in the best interest of the patient and would not jeopardize the public safety, they shall request the appropriate authorities in the receiving state to investigate the desirability of affording the patient such aftercare in said receiving state, and such investigation shall be made with all reasonable speed. The request for investigation shall be accompanied by complete information concerning the patient’s intended place of residence and the identity of the person in whose charge it is proposed to place the patient, the complete medical history of the patient, and such other documents as may be pertinent.

    (b) If the medical or other appropriate clinical authorities having responsibility for the care and treatment of the patient in the sending state and the appropriate authorities in the receiving state find that the best interest of the patient would be served thereby, and if the public safety would not be jeopardized thereby, the patient may receive aftercare or supervision in the receiving state.

    (c) In supervising, treating, or caring for a patient on aftercare pursuant to the terms of this Article, a receiving state shall employ the same standards of visitation, examination, care, and treatment that it employs for similar local patients.

    ARTICLE V.

    Whenever a dangerous or potentially dangerous patient escapes from an institution in any party state, that state shall promptly notify all appropriate authorities within and without the jurisdiction of the escape in a way reasonably calculated to facilitate the speedy apprehension of the escapee. Immediately upon the apprehension and identification of any such dangerous or potentially dangerous patient, he shall be detained in the state where found pending disposition in accordance with law.

    ARTICLE VI.

    The duly accredited officers of any state party to this Compact, upon the establishment of their authority and the identity of the patient, shall be permitted to transport any patient being moved pursuant to this Compact through any and all states party to this Compact, without interference.

    ARTICLE VII.

    (a) No person shall be deemed a patient of more than one institution at any given time. Completion of transfer of any patient to an institution in a receiving state shall have the effect of making the person a patient of the institution in the receiving state.

    (b) The sending state shall pay all costs of and incidental to the transportation of any patient pursuant to this Compact, but any two or more party states may, by making a specific agreement for that purpose, arrange for a different allocation of costs as among themselves.

    (c) No provision of this Compact shall be construed to alter or affect any internal relationships among the departments, agencies and officers of and in the government of a party state, or between a party state and its subdivisions, as to the payment of costs, or responsibilities therefor.

    (d) Nothing in this Compact shall be construed to prevent any party state or subdivision thereof from asserting any right against any person, agency or other entity in regard to costs for which such party state or subdivision thereof may be responsible pursuant to any provision of this Compact.

    (e) Nothing in this Compact shall be construed to invalidate any reciprocal agreement between a party state and a nonparty state relating to institutionalization, care or treatment of the mentally ill or mentally deficient, or any statutory authority pursuant to which such agreements may be made.

    ARTICLE VIII.

    (a) Nothing in this Compact shall be construed to abridge, diminish, or in any way impair the rights, duties, and responsibilities of any patient’s guardian on his own behalf or in respect of any patient for whom he may serve, except that where the transfer of any patient to another jurisdiction makes advisable the appointment of a supplemental or substitute guardian, any court of competent jurisdiction in the receiving state may make such supplemental or substitute appointment and the court which appointed the previous guardian shall upon being duly advised of the new appointment, and upon the satisfactory completion of such accounting and other acts as such court may by law require, relieve the previous guardian of power and responsibility to whatever extent shall be appropriate in the circumstances; provided, however, that in the case of any patient having settlement in the sending state, the court of competent jurisdiction in the sending state shall have the sole discretion to relieve a guardian appointed by it or continue his power and responsibility, whichever it shall deem advisable. The court in the receiving state may, in its discretion, confirm or reappoint the person or persons previously serving as guardian in the sending state in lieu of making a supplemental or substitute appointment.

    (b) The term “guardian” as used in paragraph (a) of this Article shall include any guardian, trustee, legal committee, conservator, or other person or agency however denominated who is charged by law with power to act for or responsibility for the person or property of a patient.

    ARTICLE IX.

    (a) No provision of this Compact except Article V shall apply to any person institutionalized while under sentence in a penal or correctional institution or while subject to trial on a criminal charge, or whose institutionalization is due to the commission of an offense for which, in the absence of mental illness or mental deficiency, said person would be subject to incarceration in a penal or correctional institution.

    (b) To every extent possible, it shall be the policy of states party to this Compact that no patient shall be placed or detained in any prison, jail or lockup, but such patient shall, with all expedition, be taken to a suitable institutional facility for mental illness or mental deficiency.

    ARTICLE X.

    (a) Each party state shall appoint a “Compact Administrator” who, on behalf of his state, shall act as general coordinator of activities under the Compact in his state and who shall receive copies of all reports, correspondence, and other documents relating to any patient processed under the Compact by his state either in the capacity of sending or receiving state. The Compact Administrator or his duly designated representative shall be the official with whom other party states shall deal in any matter relating to the Compact or any patient processed thereunder.

    (b) The Compact Administrators of the respective party states shall have power to promulgate reasonable rules and regulations to carry out more effectively the terms and provisions of this Compact.

    ARTICLE XI.

    The duly constituted administrative authorities of any two or more party states may enter into supplementary agreements for the provision of any service or facility or for the maintenance of any institution on a joint or cooperative basis whenever the states concerned shall find that such agreements will improve services, facilities, or institutional care and treatment in the fields of mental illness or mental deficiency. No such supplementary agreement shall be construed so as to relieve any party state of any obligation which it otherwise would have under other provisions of this Compact.

    ARTICLE XII.

    This Compact shall enter into full force and effect as to any state when enacted by it into law and such state shall thereafter be a party thereto with any and all states legally joining therein.

    ARTICLE XIII.

    (a) A state party to this Compact may withdraw therefrom by enacting a statute repealing the same. Such withdrawal shall take effect one year after notice thereof has been communicated officially and in writing to the governors and Compact administrators of all other party states. However, the withdrawal of any state shall not change the status of any patient who has been sent to said state or sent out of said state pursuant to the provisions of the Compact.

    (b) Withdrawal from any agreement permitted by Article VII(b) as to costs or from any supplementary agreement made pursuant to Article XI shall be in accordance with the terms of such agreement.

    ARTICLE XIV.

    This Compact shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate the purposes thereof. The provisions of this Compact shall be severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence or provision of this Compact is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any party state or of the United States or the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Compact and the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this Compact shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state party thereto, the Compact shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all severable matters.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 1; 1963, c. 1184, s. 12; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Legal Periodicals.

For comment, “Outsourcing Our Children: The Failure to Treat Mental Illness In-State,” see 36 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 66 (2013).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

A Patient Found Not Guilty of a Crime by Reason of Insanity May Not Be the Subject of Interstate Transfer. See opinion of Attorney General to Dr. Eugene A. Hargrove, Commissioner of Mental Health, 40 N.C.A.G. 388 (1970), rendered under former statutory provisions.

Transfer of a patient involuntarily committed to another state not having equivalent due process safeguards in the form of mandatory, periodic judicial rehearings is not prohibited, although the existence of adequate due process safeguards in the receiving state should be an important factor for consideration in determining the appropriateness of transfer of the patient. Opinion of Attorney General to Mr. John L. Pinnix, 45 N.C.A.G. 27 (1975), rendered under former statutory provisions.

§ 122C-362. Compact Administrator.

Pursuant to the Compact, the Secretary is the Compact Administrator and, acting jointly with like officers of other party states, may adopt rules to carry out more effectively the terms of the Compact. The Compact Administrator shall cooperate with all departments, agencies and officers of and in the government of this State and its subdivisions in facilitating the proper administration of the Compact, of any supplementary agreement, or agreements entered into by this State.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 2; 1963, c. 1184, s. 12; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-363. Supplementary agreements.

The Compact Administrator may enter into supplementary agreements with appropriate officials of other states pursuant to Articles VII and XI of the Compact. In the event that these supplementary agreements shall require or contemplate the use of any institution or facility of this State or require or contemplate the provision of any service by this State, no such agreement shall be effective until approved by the head of the department or agency under whose jurisdiction the institution or facility is operated or whose department or agency will be charged with the rendering of this service.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 3; 1963, c. 1184, s. 12; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-364. Financial arrangements.

The Compact Administrator, with the approval of the Director of the Budget, may make or arrange for any payments necessary to discharge any financial obligations imposed upon this State by the Compact or by any supplementary agreement entered into under it.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 4; 1963, c. 1184, s. 12; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-365. Transfer of clients.

The Compact Administrator is directed to consult with the immediate family or legally responsible person of any proposed transferee.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 5; 1963, c. 1184, ss. 12, 38; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-366. Transmittal of copies of Part.

Copies of this Part shall, upon its approval, be transmitted by the Compact Administrator to the governor of each state, the attorney general of each state, the Administrator of General Services of the United States, and the Council of State Governments.

History. 1959, c. 1003, s. 6; 1963, c. 1184, s. 12; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-367 through 122C-400.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Article 6. Special Provisions.

Part 1. Camp Butner and Community of Butner.

§ 122C-401. Use of Camp Butner Hospital authorized.

The State may use the Camp Butner Hospital, including buildings, equipment, and land necessary for the operation of modern up-to-date facilities for the care and treatment of citizens of this State.

History. 1947, c. 789, s. 2; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1999-140, s. 1, provides that the Camp Butner reservation and the Community of Butner, as regulated by Article 6 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, is a unique State resource that is and should continue to be administered by the State of North Carolina through the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There is a resident population in the Community of Butner that does not have elected representation with respect to public services, such as police and fire protection, and the provision of water and sewers, that would normally be under the control of an elected city council or board of county commissioners. The citizens of the Camp Butner reservation should be permitted to elect a representative body to act as the voice of the affected people of Butner with regard to the provision of public services and planning for the future of the Camp Butner reservation.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 1, provides: “Findings and Purpose. The General Assembly finds as follows:

“(1) The Camp Butner reservation is administered by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter ‘Secretary’) in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes (the Camp Butner reservation is variously referred to, in whole or in part, as the Camp Butner reservation, the Town of Butner, and the Community of Butner and in this act shall be referred to as the ‘Butner Reservation’).

“(2) The Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter ‘Department’) has long operated the Town of Butner with the Secretary or the Secretary’s designee acting as the de facto mayor of the Town of Butner.

“(3) The operation of the Town of Butner is not a core function of the Department, and the Department’s mission would not be negatively impacted by the incorporation of the Town of Butner.

“(4) The utilities were transferred to the South Granville Water and Sewer Authority (‘SGWASA’) pursuant to the provisions of Session Law 2006-159 which also provides that SGWASA shall pay to the Department a sum, indexed to inflation, as set out in that legislation to support the operations of the Butner Reservation including the Town of Butner.

“(5) The citizens of the Town of Butner currently also pay a tax authorized by Section 1 of Chapter 830 of the 1983 Session Laws of twenty-five cents (25¢) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) valuation of all real and personal property to the Butner Public Safety Division of the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety [now the Department of Public Safety].

“(6) The customers of the utility have paid for water and sewer over the years, and those payments have also financed the operations of the Town of Butner.

“(7) Certain personal property has been purchased by the Department for use in operating the Butner Reservation and that personal property traditionally used primarily for the benefit of the portion of the Butner Reservation to be incorporated should be transferred by the State to the newly incorporated Town of Butner.”

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 1.1, provides the charter for the newly incorporated Town of Butner.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 2, provides: “The incorporation of the Town of Butner by Section 1 of this act and the remaining provisions of this act satisfy the requirement of Section 2(c) of Session Law 2006-159 that the majority of the functions of the Department performed at the Butner Reservation are assumed by a municipal corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of North Carolina.”

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

§ 122C-402. Application of State highway and motor vehicle laws at State institutions on Camp Butner reservation. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

The provisions of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes relating to the use of the highways of the State and the operation of motor vehicles thereon are made applicable to the streets, alleys, and driveways on the Camp Butner reservation that are on the grounds of any State facility or any State institution operated by the Department or by the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety. Any person violating any of the provisions of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes in or on these streets, alleys, or driveways shall upon conviction be punished as prescribed in that Chapter. This section does not interfere with the ownership and control of the streets, alleys, and driveways on the grounds as is now vested by law in the Department.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 2; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1959, c. 1028, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(qqqqq).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(qqqqq), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in the first sentence of the section

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in the first sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-402. Application of State highway and motor vehicle laws at State institutions on Camp Butner reservation. [Effective January 1, 2023]

The provisions of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes relating to the use of the highways of the State and the operation of motor vehicles thereon are made applicable to the streets, alleys, and driveways on the Camp Butner reservation that are on the grounds of any State facility or any State institution operated by the Department or by the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction. Any person violating any of the provisions of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes in or on these streets, alleys, or driveways shall upon conviction be punished as prescribed in that Chapter. This section does not interfere with the ownership and control of the streets, alleys, and driveways on the grounds as is now vested by law in the Department.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 2; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1959, c. 1028, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(qqqqq); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p).

Editor's Note.

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(qqqqq), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” in the first sentence of the section

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(p), substituted “Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice of the Department of Public Safety” in the first sentence. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-403. Secretary’s authority over Camp Butner reservation.

The Secretary shall administer the Camp Butner reservation except (i) those areas within the municipal boundaries of the Town of Butner and (ii) that portion of the Town of Butner’s extraterritorial jurisdiction consisting of lands not owned by the State of North Carolina. In performing this duty, the Secretary has the powers listed below. In exercising these powers the Secretary has the same authority and is subject to the same restrictions that the governing body of a city would have and would be subject to if the reservation was a city, unless this section provides to the contrary. The Secretary may:

  1. Regulate airports on the reservation in accordance with the powers granted in Article 4 of Chapter 63 of the General Statutes.
  2. Take actions in accordance with the general police power granted in Article 8 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes.
  3. Regulate the development of the reservation in accordance with the powers granted in Article 19, Parts 2, 3, 3C, 5, 6, and 7, of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes. The Secretary may not, however, grant a special use permit, a conditional use permit, or a special exception under Part 3 of that Article. In addition, the Secretary is not required to notify landowners of zoning classification actions under G.S. 160A-384, but the Secretary shall give the mayor of the Town of Butner at least 14 days’ advance written notice of any proposed zoning change. The Secretary may designate Advisory establish a board to act like a Board of Adjustment to make recommendations to the Secretary concerning implementation of plans for the development of the reservation. When acting as a Board of Adjustment, Advisory that board shall be subject to subsections (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of G.S. 160A-388.
  4. Establish one or more planning agencies in accordance with the power granted in G.S. 160A-361.
  5. Regulate streets, traffic, and parking on the reservation in accordance with the powers granted in Article 15 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes.
  6. Control erosion and sedimentation on the reservation in accordance with the powers granted in G.S. 160A-458 and Article 4 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes.
  7. Contract with and undertake agreements with units of local government in accordance with the powers granted in G.S. 160A-413 and Article 20, Part 1, of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes.
  8. Regulate floodways on the reservation in accordance with the powers granted in G.S. 160A-458.1 and Article 21, Part 6, of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes.

    (8a) Repealed by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 4. For effective date, see editor’s note.

  9. Assign duties given by the statutes listed in the preceding subdivisions to a local official to the Secretary’s designee.

    (9a) Repealed by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 4. For effective date, see editor’s note.

  10. Adopt rules to carry out the purposes of this Article.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 3; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1959, c. 1028, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1965, c. 933; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 536, s. 2; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 667, s. 3; 1997-59, s. 5; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1999-140, s. 4; 2007-269, s. 4; 2015-160, s. 3.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 536, which amended this section, in s. 6 provides that a county ordinance that applies to the Camp Butner reservation on the effective date of the act (July 2, 1987) shall continue to apply until the Secretary of the Department of Human Resources withdraws his approval of the ordinance or the county amends or repeals the ordinance so that it no longer applies to the Camp Butner reservation.

Session Laws 1999-140, s. 4, amended this section effective when a majority of the members of the Butner Advisory Council created pursuant to G.S. 122C-413 (now repealed) as enacted by Session Laws 1999-140 have been elected and qualified. G.S. 122C-413 (now repealed) was precleared and, in November 2003 elections for the Council were held.

This section was amended by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 4, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . In the next-to-last sentence in subdivision (3), the act struck through “the Butner” but failed to strike through “designate,” which immediately preceded it. In the same sentence, the act also struck through “Council” but failed to strike through “Advisory,” which immediately preceded it. In the last sentence, the act struck through “the Butner” but failed to strike through “Advisory,” which immediately followed it. The next-to-last and last sentences have been set out in the form above at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 [now repealed] may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

G.S. 122C-413 and 122C-413.1, referred to in this section, were repealed by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 10. For effective date of repeal, see the Editor’s note under G.S. 122C-413 .

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 4, inserted “except (i) those areas . . . State of North Carolina” in the first sentence of the introductory paragraph; rewrote subdivisions (3) and (4); deleted subdivisions (8a) and (9a); and substituted “Secretary’s designee” for “Butner Town Manager” in subdivision (9). For effective date, see Editor’s note.

Session Laws 2015-160, s. 3, effective August 1, 2015, deleted “and the protest petition requirements in G.S. 160A-385, and 160A-386 do not apply” following “under G.S. 160A-384” in the third sentence of subdivision (3).

OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

Duties of the Planning Council. Until there is a vacancy in the position of Town Manager, the Planning Council is not required to submit three names to the Secretary. If the Planning Council were required to submit names while the position is filled, it would have the de facto power to fire the current Town Manager, a result which is clearly inconsistent with the authority and discretion given to the Secretary. See opinion of Attorney General to R. Marcus Lodge General Counsel Department of Health and Human Services, 1997 N.C. Op. Att'y Gen. 64 (11/4/97).

§ 122C-404. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1995 (Regular Session, 1996), c. 667, s. 4.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 536, which amended this section, in s. 6 provided that a county ordinance that applies to the Camp Butner reservation on the effective date of the act (July 2, 1987) shall continue to apply until the Secretary of the Department of Human Resources withdraws his approval of the ordinance or the county amends or repeals the ordinance so that it no longer applies to the Camp Butner reservation.

§ 122C-405. Procedure applicable to rules.

Rules adopted by the Secretary under this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the procedures for adopting a city ordinance on the same subject, shall be subject to review in the manner provided for a city ordinance adopted on the same subject, and shall be enforceable in accordance with the procedures for enforcing a city ordinance on the same subject. Violation of a rule adopted under this Article is punishable as provided in G.S. 122C-406 .

Rules adopted under this Article may apply to part or all of the Camp Butner Reservation, except those areas within the municipal boundaries of the Town of Butner and that portion of the Town of Butner’s extraterritorial jurisdiction consisting of lands not owned by the State of North Carolina. If a public hearing is required before the adoption of a rule, Advisory the Secretary shall designate one or more employees of the Department to conduct the hearing. The Butner Town Council shall receive at least 14 days’ advance written notice of any public hearing with all correspondence concerning such public hearings to be directed to the mayor of the Town of Butner and sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or equivalent delivery service to Butner Town Hall.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1981, c. 614, s. 6; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 536, s. 4; c. 720, s. 3; 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 667, s. 5; 1997-59, s. 6; 1999-140, s. 5; 2007-269, s. 5.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 536, which amended this section, in s. 6 provides that a county ordinance that applies to the Camp Butner reservation on the effective date of the act (July 2, 1987) shall continue to apply until the Secretary of the Department of Human Resources withdraws his approval of the ordinance or the county amends or repeals the ordinance so that it no longer applies to the Camp Butner reservation.

Session Laws 1999-140, s. 5, amended this section effective when a majority of the members of the Butner Advisory Council created pursuant to G.S. 122C-413 (now repealed) as enacted by Session Laws 1999-140 have been elected and qualified. G.S. 122C-413 (now repealed) was precleared and, in November 2003 elections for the Council were held.

This section was amended by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 5, in the coded bill drafting format provided by G.S. 120-20.1 . In the second sentence of the second paragraph, the act struck through “the Butner” but failed to strike through “Advisory,” which immediately followed it. The second sentence of the second paragraph is set out in the form above at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 [now repealed] may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 5, rewrote the second paragraph. For effective date, see Editor’s note.

§ 122C-406. Violations made misdemeanor.

A person who violates an ordinance or rule adopted under this Part is guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 927; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).

§ 122C-407. Water and sewer system.

  1. The Department may acquire, construct, establish, enlarge, maintain, operate, and contract for the operation of a water supply and distribution system and a sewage collection and disposal system for the Camp Butner Reservation, and may enter into such contracts, memoranda of understanding, and other agreements with other persons or entities, including, but not limited to, local governments, authorities, and private enterprises, reasonably necessary to extend or otherwise provide water and sewer service to any portion of the Camp Butner Reservation.
  2. Those things authorized by subsection (a) of this section may be operated for the benefit of persons and property within the Camp Butner reservation and areas outside the reservation within reasonable limitations specifically including any sanitary district, water and sewer authority, county water and sewer district, or municipality in Durham or Granville Counties.
  3. The Secretary may fix and enforce water and sewer rates and charges in accordance with G.S. 160A-314 as if it were a city.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2007-269, s. 6.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 2, provides: “The incorporation of the Town of Butner by Section 1 of this act and the remaining provisions of this act satisfy the requirement of Section 2(c) of Session Law 2006-159 that the majority of the functions of the Department performed at the Butner Reservation are assumed by a municipal corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of North Carolina.”

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 [now repealed] may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 6, added “and may enter into such contracts . . . Camp Butner Reservation” at the end of subsection (a); in subsection (b), substituted “Those things authorized by subsection (a) of this section” for “These water and sewer systems” at the beginning, and substituted “district, water and sewer authority, county water and sewer district, or municipality” for “or city” near the end; and made a minor stylistic change. For effective date, see Editor’s note.

§ 122C-408. Former Butner Public Safety Authority; jurisdiction; fire and police protection.

  1. Police and Fire Protection. —  The Town of Butner may contract with the State of North Carolina or any state agency for the provision of special police officers or fire protection or both to any State or federal institution or lands within the territory of the Camp Butner Reservation. The territorial jurisdiction of these officers shall consist of the property shown on a map produced May 20, 2003, by the Information Systems Division of the North Carolina General Assembly and kept on file in the office of the Butner Town Manager and such additional areas which are within the incorporated limits of the Town of Butner as shown on a map to be kept in the office of the Butner Town Manager.
  2. Authority of Special Police Officers. —  In order to assist the Town of Butner in providing contractual services to State agencies and facilities within the territorial jurisdiction set out in subsection (a) of this section, the officers providing police services to the Town of Butner shall have the additional authority set out in this subsection. After taking the oath of office required for law-enforcement officers, the special police officers authorized by this section shall have the authority of deputy sheriffs of Durham and Granville Counties in those counties respectively. Within the territorial jurisdiction stated in subsection (a) of this section, the special police officers have the authority to enforce the laws of North Carolina, the ordinances of the Town of Butner, and any rule applicable to the Camp Butner Reservation adopted under authority of this Part or under G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or under the authority granted any other agency of the State and also have the powers set forth for firemen in Articles 80, 82, and 83 of Chapter 58 of the General Statutes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Town of Butner has no obligation or responsibility to provide law enforcement or fire protection services outside of the corporate limits of the Town of Butner except pursuant to a contract with a State agency or facility, a federal entity, or a private person or entity. In the event that any State agency contracts with the Town of Butner for police services at any facility within the territorial jurisdiction described in subsection (a) of this section, any civil or criminal process to be served on any individual confined at any such State facility may be forwarded by the sheriff of the county in which the process originated to the director or chief of the Town of Butner’s law enforcement department or that officer’s designee.

History. 1949, c. 71, s. 6; 1955, c. 887, s. 1; 1959, c. 35; c. 1028, s. 4; 1963, c. 1166, s. 10; 1973, c. 476, s. 133; 1981, c. 491, s. 1; c. 964, s. 19; c. 1127, s. 49; 1983, c. 761, s. 165; 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 1987, c. 827, s. 246; 1989, c. 141, s. 16; 2003-346, s. 2; 2007-269, s. 7; 2011-145, ss. 19.1(g), (jj), 19.3(b); 2011-260, ss. 1, 6(a), (b); 2011-391, s. 43(m); 2012-50, ss. 1-3; 2013-360, s. 16B.4(b).

Cross References.

As to cooperation between law-enforcement agencies, see G.S. 160A-288 .

As to assistance to State law-enforcement agencies, see G.S. 160A-288.2 .

State Government Reorganization.

Session Laws 1981, c. 491, s. 2, provided: “The Butner Public Safety Department is transferred by a type I transfer, as defined in G.S. 143A-6 , from the Department of Human Resources to the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety [now the Department of Public Safety]. All transfers of personnel, equipment, appropriations, and functions shall be completed by September 1, 1981, but the Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety shall have authority over the personnel, equipment, appropriations, and functions transferred by this section upon the effective date of this act [July 1, 1981].”

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 7, rewrote subsection (a); in the second sentence of subsection (b), inserted “the ordinances of the Town of Butner,” and substituted “the Butner Reservation” for “that territory”; and added subsection (c). For effective date, see Editor’s note.

§ 122C-409. Community of Butner comprehensive emergency management plan.

The Department of Public Safety shall establish an emergency management agency as defined in G.S. 166A-19.3(9) for the Camp Butner Reservation, and the Town of Butner.

History. 1985, c. 589, s. 2; 2007-269, s. 8; 2011-145, s. 19.1(g); 2012-12, s. 2(r).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 8, substituted “for the Camp Butner Reservation, and the Town of Butner” for “for the Community of Butner and the Camp Butner reservation.” For effective date, see Editor’s note.

§ 122C-410. Authority of county or city over Camp Butner Reservation; zoning jurisdiction by Town of Butner over State lands.

  1. A municipality other than the Town of Butner may not annex territory extending into or extend its extraterritorial jurisdiction into the Camp Butner reservation without written approval from the Secretary and the Butner Town Council of each proposed annexation or extension. The Town of Butner may not annex territory extending into or extend its extraterritorial jurisdiction into those portions of the Camp Butner Reservation owned by the State of North Carolina without written approval from the Secretary of each proposed annexation or extension. The procedures, if any, for withdrawing approval granted by the Secretary to an annexation or extension of extraterritorial jurisdiction shall be stated in the notice of approval.
  2. A county ordinance may apply in part or all of the Camp Butner reservation (other than areas within the Town of Butner) if the Secretary gives written approval of the ordinance, except that ordinances adopted by a county under Article 18 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes may not apply in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town of Butner without approval of the Butner Town Council. The Secretary may withdraw approval of a county ordinance by giving written notification, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the county. A county ordinance ceases to be effective in the Camp Butner reservation 30 days after the county receives the written notice of the withdrawal of approval. This section does not enhance or diminish the authority of a county to enact ordinances applicable to the Town of Butner and its extraterritorial jurisdiction.
  3. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article, no portion of the lands owned by the State as of September 1, 2007, which are located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction or the incorporated limits of the Town of Butner shall be subject to any of the powers granted to the Town of Butner pursuant to Article 19 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes except as to property no longer owned by the State. If any portion of such property owned by the State of North Carolina as of September 1, 2007, is no longer owned by the State, the Town of Butner may exercise all legal authority granted to the Town pursuant to the terms of its charter or by Article 19 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes and may do so by ordinances adopted prior to the actual date of transfer. Before the State shall dispose of any property inside the incorporated limits of the Town of Butner or any of that property currently under the control of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services or the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town of Butner, southeast of Old Highway 75, northeast of Central Avenue, southwest of 33rdStreet, and northwest of “G” Street, by sale or lease for any use not directly associated with a State function, the Town of Butner shall first be given the right of first refusal to purchase said property at fair market value as determined by the average of the value of said property as determined by a qualified appraiser selected by the Secretary and a qualified appraiser selected by the Town of Butner.

History. 1987, c. 536, s. 5; 2007-269, s. 9.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1987, c. 536, which enacted this section, in s. 6 provides that a county ordinance that applies to the Camp Butner reservation on the effective date of the act shall continue to apply until the Secretary of the Department of Human Resources withdraws his approval of the ordinance or the county amends or repeals the ordinance so that it no longer applies to the Camp Butner reservation. The act was ratified July 2, 1987.

Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended by 2003-346, s. 3, as amended by Session Laws 2005-276, s. 43.3, as amended by Session Laws 2006-4, s. 1, and as amended by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14, provided: “(a) The territorial jurisdiction of the Butner Police and Fire Protection district shall include: (i) any property formerly a part of the original Camp Butner reservation, including both those areas currently owned and occupied by the State and its agencies and those which may have been leased or otherwise disposed of by the State; (ii) the Lyons Station Sanitary District; and (iii) that part of Granville County adjoining the Butner reservation and the Lyons Station Sanitary District situated north and west of the intersection of Rural Paved Roads 1103 and 1106 and bounded by those roads and the boundaries of said reservation and said sanitary district, provided, however, that those portions of said lands within the corporate limits of the Town of Butner are removed from the Butner Police and Fire Protection District for the purposes hereof.

“(b) The territorial jurisdiction set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall constitute the Butner Fire and Police Protection District. The tax collectors of Durhamand Granville Counties shall annually collect a tax of twenty-five cents (25) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) valuation of all real and personal property in the portions of said district in their respective counties from year to year which tax shall be collected as county taxes are collected and shall remit the same to the State Treasurer for deposit in the General Fund.

“(c) As long as G.S. 122C-410 prevents annexation by any municipality of any territory within the Camp Butner reservation without written approval of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, no municipality may annex under Article 4A of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes any part of the Lyons Station Sanitary District.” Preclearance was received for S.L. 2003-346 by letter to Gary O. Bartlett from Joseph Rich, dated October 6, 2003.

Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended, was repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 3. In addition, Session Laws 2011-260, s. 6(b), repealed Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.3(a), which would have amended Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 9, in the section catchline, added “zoning jurisdiction by Town of Butner over State lands” at the end and made a minor stylistic change; rewrote subsections (a) and (b); and added subsection (c). For effective date, see Editor’s note.

§ 122C-411. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 2, effective June 23, 2011.

History. 1987, c. 845, s. 1; 2011-145, ss. 19.1(g), 19.3(c); 2011-260, s. 6(b); repealed by 2011-260, s. 2, effective June 23, 2011.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 122C-411 pertained to fire protection contracts.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1(g), effective January 1, 2012, would have amended this section. Due to the repeal of this section by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 2, however, that amendment was never given effect.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.3(c), would have amended this section, but was repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 6(b).

§ 122C-411.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 1996, Second Extra Session, c. 18, s. 21.4.

Editor’s Note.

This section, regarding Butner public safety fees, was enacted by Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 667, s. 6, effective June 21, 1996, and repealed by Session Laws 1996, Second Extra Session, c. 18, s. 21.4, effective June 21, 1996. Because of the repeal, the section is not set out.

Part 1A. Butner Planning Council.

§§ 122C-412 through 122C-412.2. [Repealed]

Repealed.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 1995 (Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 667, s. 1, provides: “The General Assembly finds that the Camp Butner Reservation and the Community of Butner, as regulated by Article 6 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, is a unique State resource that is and should continue to be administered by the State of North Carolina through the Office of the Secretary of Human Resources. The General Assembly finds that there is a resident population in the Community of Butner that, because of the unique relationship between the State of North Carolina and cities and counties, as provided in G.S. 122C-410 , does not have elected representation with respect to public services, such as police and fire protection, and the provision of water and sewers, that would normally be under the control of an elected city council or board of county commissioners. The General Assembly finds that the citizens of the Camp Butner Reservation should be permitted to elect a representative body to act as the voice of the affected people of Butner in dealing with the State of North Carolina through the Department of Human Resources with regard to the provision of public services and planning for the future of the Camp Butner Reservation.”

Session Laws 1999-140, s. 7, provides for the repeal of this Part when a majority of the members of the Butner Advisory Council created pursuant to G.S. 122C-413 (now repealed) as enacted by Session Laws 1999-140 have been elected and qualified. Elections were held in November 2003.

Part 1B. Butner Advisory Council.

§§ 122C-413, 122C-413.1. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 10. For effective date, see Editor’s note.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended by 2003-346, s. 3, as amended by Session Laws 2005-276, s. 43.3, as amended by Session Laws 2006-4, s. 1, and as amended by Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14, provided: “(a) The territorial jurisdiction of the Butner Police and Fire Protection district shall include: (i) any property formerly a part of the original Camp Butner reservation, including both those areas currently owned and occupied by the State and its agencies and those which may have been leased or otherwise disposed of by the State; (ii) the Lyons Station Sanitary District; and (iii) that part of Granville County adjoining the Butner reservation and the Lyons Station Sanitary District situated north and west of the intersection of Rural Paved Roads 1103 and 1106 and bounded by those roads and the boundaries of said reservation and said sanitary district, provided, however, that those portions of said lands within the corporate limits of the Town of Butner are removed from the Butner Police and Fire Protection District for the purposes hereof.

“(b) The territorial jurisdiction set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall constitute the Butner Fire and Police Protection District. The tax collectors of Durhamand Granville Counties shall annually collect a tax of twenty-five cents (25) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) valuation of all real and personal property in the portions of said district in their respective counties from year to year which tax shall be collected as county taxes are collected and shall remit the same to the State Treasurer for deposit in the General Fund.

“(c) As long as G.S. 122C-410 prevents annexation by any municipality of any territory within the Camp Butner reservation without written approval of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, no municipality may annex under Article 4A of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes any part of the Lyons Station Sanitary District.”

Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended, was repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 3. In addition, Session Laws 2011-260, s. 6(b), repealed Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.3(a), which would have amended Session Laws 1983, c. 830, s. 1, as amended.

Session Laws 1999-140, s. 1, provides that the Camp Butner reservation and the Community of Butner, as regulated by Article 6 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes, is a unique State resource that is and should continue to be administered by the State of North Carolina through the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There is a resident population in the Community of Butner that does not have elected representation with respect to public services, such as police and fire protection, and the provision of water and sewers, that would normally be under the control of an elected city council or board of county commissioners. The citizens of the Camp Butner reservation should be permitted to elect a representative body to act as the voice of the affected people of Butner with regard to the provision of public services and planning for the future of the Camp Butner reservation.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.3, provides: “Section 14 of this act removes the territory within the corporate limits of the Town of Butner from the Butner Police and Fire Protection District provided by Section 1 of Chapter 830 of the 1983 Session Laws, as amended. Since this act will become effective after July 1, 2007, with respect to taxes on property located within the corporate limits, for taxes levied for the 2007-2008 fiscal year, if the incorporation becomes effective, Granville County shall remit to the Town of Butner rather than to the State General Fund the taxes collected for that district on properties located within the corporate limits. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, if Granville County does not bill the Butner Police and Fire Protection District tax for fiscal year 2007-2008 on properties located within the proposed corporate limits until either the incorporation is either precleared or rejected under Section 5, those taxes are released or refunded if the incorporation is precleared, or shall be billed if the incorporation is rejected.”

Preclearance was received for S.L. 2003-346 by letter to Gary O. Bartlett from Joseph Rich, dated October 6, 2003.

Part 1D. Butner Commissions.

§ 122C-414. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 2, effective June 23, 2011.

History. 2007-269, s. 11; 2011-145, s. 19.1(g), (kk); 2011-260, s. 6(a); repealed by 2011-260, s. 2, effective June 23, 2011.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 122C-414 pertained to the Butner Commissions.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.1(g), effective January 1, 2012, would have amended this section. Due to the repeal of this section by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 2, that amendment was never given effect.

Session Laws 2011-145, s. 19.3(kk), would have amended this section, but was repealed by Session Laws 2011-260, s. 6(a).

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 14.1, provides: “Section 1.1 through 14 of this act shall become effective only if the Charter of the Town of Butner is approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965; provided, however, that if the Charter is not approved under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because of any provisions contained in Article III or Article IV of the Charter, the Butner Advisory Council established in accordance with G.S. 122C-413 may make such amendments to the Article III or IV of the Charter as it, in its sole discretion, deems necessary to obtain such approval, and such amendments shall be filed in accordance with G.S. 160A-111 . If the Charter is not approved, Sections 1.1 through 14 of this act have no force and effect. If the Charter is approved, then those sections become effective on the first day of the next calendar month that begins more than three days after the approval, except that the persons appointed as temporary officers under Section 3.2 of the Charter may immediately take the oath of office and take such preliminary actions as may be necessary for initial organization, personnel actions, and budget adoption, in such special meetings as may be called under G.S. 160A-71 .” Preclearance was received from the United States Department of Justice by letter dated October 1, 2007.

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 1, provides: “Findings and Purpose. The General Assembly finds as follows:

“(1) The Camp Butner reservation is administered by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter ‘Secretary’) in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes (the Camp Butner reservation is variously referred to, in whole or in part, as the Camp Butner reservation, the Town of Butner, and the Community of Butner and in this act shall be referred to as the ‘Butner Reservation’).

“(2) The Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter ‘Department’) has long operated the Town of Butner with the Secretary or the Secretary’s designee acting as the de facto mayor of the Town of Butner.

“(3) The operation of the Town of Butner is not a core function of the Department, and the Department’s mission would not be negatively impacted by the incorporation of the Town of Butner.

“(4) The utilities were transferred to the South Granville Water and Sewer Authority (‘SGWASA’) pursuant to the provisions of Session Law 2006-159 which also provides that SGWASA shall pay to the Department a sum, indexed to inflation, as set out in that legislation to support the operations of the Butner Reservation including the Town of Butner.

“(5) The citizens of the Town of Butner currently also pay a tax authorized by Section 1 of Chapter 830 of the 1983 Session Laws of twenty-five cents (25¢) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) valuation of all real and personal property to the Butner Public Safety Division of the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety [now the Department of Public Safety].

“(6) The customers of the utility have paid for water and sewer over the years, and those payments have also financed the operations of the Town of Butner.

“(7) Certain personal property has been purchased by the Department for use in operating the Butner Reservation and that personal property traditionally used primarily for the benefit of the portion of the Butner Reservation to be incorporated should be transferred by the State to the newly incorporated Town of Butner.”

Session Laws 2007-269, s. 1.1, provides the charter for the newly incorporated Town of Butner.

§ 122C-415. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2011-266, s. 1.5, effective July 1, 2011.

History. 2007-269, s. 11; repealed by 2011-266, s. 1.5, effective July 1, 2011.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 122C-415 pertained to the Butner Lands Commission.

§§ 122C-416 through 122C-420.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2. Black Mountain Center and Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center Joint Security Force.

§ 122C-421. Joint security force. [Effective until January 1, 2023]

  1. The Secretary may designate one or more special police officers who shall make up a joint security force to enforce the law of North Carolina and any ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or pursuant to the authority granted the Department by any other law on the territory of the Black Mountain Center and the Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center in Buncombe County. After taking the oath of office for law enforcement officers as set out in G.S. 11-11 , these special police officers have the same powers as peace officers now vested in sheriffs within the territory embraced by the named centers. These special police officers may arrest persons outside the territory of the named centers but within the confines of Buncombe County when the person arrested has committed a criminal offense within that territory, for which the officers could have arrested the person within that territory, and the arrest is made during the person’s immediate and continuous flight from that territory.
  2. These special police officers may exercise any and all of the powers enumerated in this Part upon or in pursuit from the property formerly occupied by the Black Mountain Center and now occupied by the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety. These special police officers shall exercise said powers upon the property transferred to the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety only by agreement of the Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety and the Department of Health and Human Services.
  3. Upon assignment by the Secretary, or Secretary’s designee, to any State-operated facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-183 , these special police officers may exercise the same power enumerated in this Part within the territory of the named facility and within the county in which the facility is located.

History. 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1116, s. 30; 1985, c. 408, ss. 3, 5; c. 589, s. 2; 1995, c. 391, s. 3; 1997-320, s. 2; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 13(gg); 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(rrrrr); 2019-240, s. 19(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(a), effective November 6, 2019, rewrote the Part heading, which formerly read “Black Mountain Joint Security Force.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(rrrrr), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout subsection (b).

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(b), effective November 6, 2019, in subsection (a), substituted “Black Mountain Center and the Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center” for “Black Mountain Center, the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center, and the Juvenile Evaluation Center, all” and deleted the third sentence which formerly read: “These special police officers shall also have the power prescribed by G.S. 7B-1900 outside the territory embraced by the named centers but within the confines of Buncombe County.”; in subsection (b), substituted “now occupied by the” for “transferred to the,” and deleted “and Juvenile Justice” following “Adult Correction” three times; and added subsection (c).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(qqq), in subsection (b), substituted “Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety” three times. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§ 122C-421. Joint security force. [Effective January 1, 2023]

  1. The Secretary may designate one or more special police officers who shall make up a joint security force to enforce the law of North Carolina and any ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or pursuant to the authority granted the Department by any other law on the territory of the Black Mountain Center and the Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center in Buncombe County. After taking the oath of office for law enforcement officers as set out in G.S. 11-11 , these special police officers have the same powers as peace officers now vested in sheriffs within the territory embraced by the named centers. These special police officers may arrest persons outside the territory of the named centers but within the confines of Buncombe County when the person arrested has committed a criminal offense within that territory, for which the officers could have arrested the person within that territory, and the arrest is made during the person’s immediate and continuous flight from that territory.
  2. These special police officers may exercise any and all of the powers enumerated in this Part upon or in pursuit from the property formerly occupied by the Black Mountain Center and now occupied by the Department of Adult Correction. These special police officers shall exercise said powers upon the property transferred to the Department of Adult Correction only by agreement of the Department of Adult Correction and the Department of Health and Human Services.
  3. Upon assignment by the Secretary, or Secretary’s designee, to any State-operated facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-183 , these special police officers may exercise the same power enumerated in this Part within the territory of the named facility and within the county in which the facility is located.

History. 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1116, s. 30; 1985, c. 408, ss. 3, 5; c. 589, s. 2; 1995, c. 391, s. 3; 1997-320, s. 2; 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1998-202, s. 13(gg); 2011-145, s. 19.1(h); 2017-186, s. 2(rrrrr); 2019-240, s. 19(b); 2021-180, s. 19C.9(qqq).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(a), effective November 6, 2019, rewrote the Part heading, which formerly read “Black Mountain Joint Security Force.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(aaaaa), made the amendments to subsection (b) of this section by Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(qqq), effective January 1, 2023, and further provides: “On and after that date, any references or directives in this act to the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Adult Correction in the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, the Section of Juvenile Justice of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, or the Section of Community Corrections of the Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice shall be construed to apply to the appropriate division of either the Department of Public Safety or the Department of Adult Correction pursuant to the departmental changes enacted by this section.”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 1.1, provides: “This act shall be known as the ‘Current Operations Appropriations Act of 2021.’”

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 43.7, is a severability clause.

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2017-186, s. 2(rrrrr), effective December 1, 2017, inserted “and Juvenile Justice” throughout subsection (b).

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(b), effective November 6, 2019, in subsection (a), substituted “Black Mountain Center and the Julian F. Keith Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center” for “Black Mountain Center, the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center, and the Juvenile Evaluation Center, all” and deleted the third sentence which formerly read: “These special police officers shall also have the power prescribed by G.S. 7B-1900 outside the territory embraced by the named centers but within the confines of Buncombe County.”; in subsection (b), substituted “now occupied by the” for “transferred to the,” and deleted “and Juvenile Justice” following “Adult Correction” three times; and added subsection (c).

Session Laws 2021-180, s. 19C.9(qqq), in subsection (b), substituted “Department of Adult Correction” for “Division of Adult Correction of the Department of Public Safety” three times. For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.

§§ 122C-422 through 122C-429.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2A. Broughton Hospital, Western Regional Vocational Rehabilitation Facility, and J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center Joint Security Force.

§ 122C-430. Joint security force.

  1. The Secretary may designate one or more special police officers who shall make up a joint security force to enforce the law of North Carolina and any ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or pursuant to the authority granted the Department by any other law on the territory of the Broughton Hospital, Western Regional Vocational Rehabilitation Facility, J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center, and the surrounding grounds and land adjacent to Broughton Hospital allocated to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, all in Burke County. After taking the oath of office for law enforcement officers as set out in G.S. 11-11 , these special police officers have the same powers as peace officers now vested in sheriffs within the territory embraced by the named facilities. These special police officers may arrest persons outside the territory of the named institutions but within the confines of Burke County when the person arrested has committed a criminal offense within that territory for which the officers could have arrested the person within that territory, and the arrest is made during the person’s immediate and continuous flight from that territory.
  2. Upon assignment by the Secretary, or Secretary’s designee, to any State-operated facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-183 , these special police officers may exercise the same power enumerated in this Part within the territory of the named facility and within the county in which the facility is located.

History. 1997-320, s. 1; 2007-177, s. 3; 2008-187, s. 30; 2019-240, s. 19(c).

Local Modification.

Burke County: 2004-29, s. 2.

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(c), effective November 6, 2019, rewrote the Part 2A heading, which formerly read “Broughton Hospital Joint Security Force.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2007-177, s. 3, as amended by Session Laws 2008-187, s. 30, effective August 7, 2008, substituted “North Carolina School for the Deaf at Morganton (K-12)” for “North Carolina School for the Deaf” and “J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center” for “Western Carolina Center.”

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(c), effective November 6, 2019, designated the existing provision as subsection (a) and deleted “North Carolina School for the Deaf at Morganton (K-12)” preceding “Western Regional”; and added subsection (b).

§§ 122C-430.1 through 122C-430.9.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2B. Cherry Hospital and O’berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center Joint Security Force.

§ 122C-430.10. Joint security force.

  1. The Secretary may designate one or more special police officers who shall make up a joint security force to enforce the law of North Carolina and any ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or pursuant to the authority granted the Department by any other law on the territory of the Cherry Hospital and the O’Berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center in Wayne County. After taking the oath of office for law enforcement officers as set out in G.S. 11-11 , these special police officers have the same powers as peace officers now vested in sheriffs within the territory of the Cherry Hospital. These special police officers shall also have the power prescribed by G.S. 122C-205 outside the territory of the Cherry Hospital and the O’Berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center but within the confines of Wayne County. These special police officers may arrest persons outside the territory of the Cherry Hospital but within the confines of Wayne County, when the person arrested has committed a criminal offense within the territory of the Cherry Hospital and the O’Berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center, for which the officers could have arrested the person within that territory, and the arrest is made during the person’s immediate and continuous flight from that territory.
  2. Upon assignment by the Secretary, or Secretary’s designee, to any State-operated facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-183 , these special police officers may exercise the same power enumerated in this Part within the territory of the named facility and within the county in which the facility is located.

History. 2001-125, s. 1; 2019-240, s. 19(d).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(d), effective November 6, 2019, rewrote the Part 2B heading, which formerly read “Cherry Hospital Joint Security Force.”

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(d), effective November 6, 2019, designated the existing provision as subsection (a) and added subsection (b); and in subsection (a), inserted “and the O’Berry Neuro-Medical Treatment Center” three times.

§§ 122C-430.11 through 122C-430.19.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2C. Dorothea Dix Hospital Joint Security Force.

§ 122C-430.20. [Repealed]

Repealed by Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(e), effective November 6, 2019.

History. 2001-125, s. 1; repealed by Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(e), effective November 6, 2019.

Editor’s Note.

Former G.S. 122C-430.20 pertained to the joint security force.

§§ 122C-430.21 through 122C-430.29.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 2D. Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center and Eastern North Carolina School for the Deaf Joint Security Force.

§ 122C-430.30. Joint security force.

  1. The Secretary may designate one or more special police officers who shall make up a joint security force to enforce the law of North Carolina and any ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. 143-116.6 or G.S. 143-116.7 or pursuant to the authority granted the Department by any other law on the territory of the Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center in Wilson County. After taking the oath of office for law enforcement officers as set out in G.S. 11-11 , these special police officers have the same powers as peace officers now vested in sheriffs within the territory embraced by the Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center. These special police officers may arrest persons outside the territory of the Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center, but within the confines of Wilson County when the person arrested has committed a criminal offense within that territory for which the officers could have arrested the person within that territory, and the arrest is made during the person’s immediate and continuous flight from that territory.
  2. These special police officers may exercise any and all of the powers enumerated in this Part upon the property of, or in pursuit from, the Eastern North Carolina School for the Deaf only by agreement of the Department of Public Instruction and the Department of Health and Human Services.
  3. Upon assignment by the Secretary, or Secretary’s designee, to any State-operated facility pursuant to G.S. 122C-183 , these special police officers may exercise the same power enumerated in this Part within the territory of the named facility and within the county in which the facility is located.

History. 2009-315, s. 3; 2019-240, s. 19(f).

Effect of Amendments.

Session Laws 2009-315, s. 4, made this Part effective July 17, 2009.

Session Laws 2019-240, s. 19(f), effective November 6, 2019, designated the existing provision as subsection (a); in present subsection (a), and added subsections (b) and (c); in subsection (a), substituted “Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center” for “Long Leaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center and the Eastern North Carolina School for the Deaf” in the first sentence, and for “named facilities” in the second sentence, and for “named institutions” in the third sentence.

Part 3. North Carolina Alcoholism Research Authority.

§ 122C-431. North Carolina Alcoholism Research Authority created.

  1. The North Carolina Alcoholism Research Authority is created and shall consist of and be governed by a nine-member board to be appointed by the Governor. Three of the members shall be appointed for a two-year term, three shall be appointed for a four-year term and three shall be appointed for a six-year term; thereafter all appointments shall be for terms of six years. Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the board shall be filled by the Governor for the unexpired term.
  2. The board shall elect one of its members as chairman and one as vice-chairman. The director of the Center for Alcohol Studies of The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill shall serve ex officio as executive secretary to the Authority. Board members shall receive the same per diem, subsistence, and travel allowances as members of similar State boards and commissions, provided funds are available in the “Alcoholism Research Fund” for this purpose.

History. 1973, c. 682, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-432. Authorized to receive and spend funds.

The Authority may receive funds from State, federal, private, or other sources. These funds shall be held separately and designated as the “Alcoholism Research Fund”. The Authority shall spend the Fund on research as to the causes and effects of alcohol abuse and alcoholism and for the training of alcohol research personnel. Expenditures for the purposes specified in this section shall be made as grants to nonprofit corporations, organizations, agencies, or institutions engaging in such research or training. The Authority may also pay necessary administrative expenses from the Fund.

History. 1973, c. 682, s. 3; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§ 122C-433. Applications for grants; promulgation of rules.

  1. Applications for grants are processed by the Center for Alcohol Studies. All applications shall be reviewed by scientific consultants to the Center; and the Center, after review and study, shall make recommendations to the Authority as to the awarding of grants. The Center shall also furnish to the Authority clerical assistance as may be required.
  2. The Authority shall adopt rules relative to applications for grants, the reviewing of grants and awarding of grants.

History. 1973, c. 682, ss. 4, 5; 1985, c. 589, s. 2.

§§ 122C-434 through 122C-449.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 4. Educational Services in Private Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities.

§ 122C-450. Definitions.

The following definitions apply in this Part:

  1. “Educational services” means appropriate education-related assessment and instruction provided to any child residing in a private psychiatric residential treatment facility, including special education and related services to a child with a disability as defined in G.S. 115C-106.3(1). An education-related assessment includes the determination of need for special education and related services.
  2. “Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program” means a facility-based school that meets all of the following criteria:
    1. Provides at least one teacher for every 14 students. The PRTF shall report exceptions to this requirement to (i) the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (MH/DD/SAS) to request additional funding for educational services as provided under G.S. 122C-451(d) to the extent that funds are available and, if funds are not available, (ii) the Department of Public Instruction to request a waiver from this requirement.
    2. Provides at least one teacher with a North Carolina Professional Educator license in special education, if there is a child with a disability as defined in G.S. 115C-106.3(1) residing in the PRTF.
    3. Registers with the Department of Administration, Division of Nonpublic Schools, under Article 39 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes.
    4. Has been approved by the Department of Public Instruction to provide educational services as promulgated by the rules adopted by the State Board of Education pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act.
  3. “Private psychiatric residential treatment facility” (PRTF) means a facility, other than a hospital, that provides psychiatric and other behavioral health services as described in Subpart D of C.F.R. Part 441 of Chapter 42 to individuals under age 21 in an inpatient setting licensed by the Department of Health and Human Services as provided under Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. A PRTF does not include a State-operated facility.

History. 2014-100, s. 8.39(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.8, made this section effective July 1, 2014.

G.S. 122C-450.1 through 122C-450.4, as enacted by Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(e), were renumbered as 122C-451 through 122C-454 at the direction of the Revisor of Statutes.

At the direction of the Revisor of Statutes, the (a) designator was deleted as the section as enacted had no subsection (b).

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(g), provides: “The State Board of Education shall adopt emergency rules pursuant to G.S. 150B-21.1 A to monitor the delivery of educational services in PRTFs, including a process to inform the Department of Health and Human Services when services are not being provided.”

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(j), provides: “The Department of Public Instruction shall process all applications submitted by PRTFs on or before September 1, 2014, for approval as a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program no later than December 1, 2014.”

§ 122C-451. Eligibility and allocations.

  1. A child who is receiving psychiatric and other behavioral health services in a PRTF shall also receive educational services in accordance with federal and State law, if the child is eligible to enroll in public schools as provided in G.S. 115C-366 , including a student who has been suspended or expelled but otherwise meets the requirements of that statute. For a child with a disability, as defined in G.S. 115C-106.3(1), who has been placed in a PRTF, all educational services shall meet applicable standards as required under Article 9 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes.
  2. A PRTF shall be qualified to receive a funding allocation, to the extent that funds are available from the Department of Health and Human Services, to provide educational services if the following conditions are met:
    1. The PRTF is licensed by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Chapter 122C of the General Statutes and has a facility-based school approved by the Department of Public Instruction as a Nonpublic Exceptional Children’s Program.
    2. The PRTF documents deviations from educational and other programmatic requirements when it is medically necessary for a resident in accordance with G.S. 122C-62(e) .
  3. A PRTF that meets the qualification standards required in subsection (b) of this section may enter into an educational services contract, to the extent that funds are available, with a local school administrative unit to assist in the delivery of educational services to the children in the PRTF. The contract shall clearly define the education-related assessment, instruction, and legal responsibilities of both parties engaging in the educational services contract. A PRTF entering into an educational services contract with a local school administrative unit shall submit the educational services contract to both the Department of Public Instruction and the Department of Health and Human Services for inclusion in any required reports to the General Assembly regarding the provision of educational services to children in PRTFs.
  4. To the extent that funds are available in the Department of Public Instruction for the delivery of educational services in PRTFs as provided in this Part, those funds shall be transferred to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS). The funds transferred for the purchase of educational services within the PRTF shall not be allocated to LME/MCOs but shall be held in reserve at the DMH/DD/SAS. The DMH/DD/SAS shall use the reserve funds to pay for educational services authorized by the Department of Public Instruction and billed by the PRTFs in a process established by the DMH/DD/SAS. The funds transferred to the DMH/DD/SAS pursuant to this section shall be allocated to the PRTFs for educational services in a manner determined by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Instruction in a Memorandum of Understanding or a Memorandum of Agreement. The Department of Health and Human Services shall disburse for these purposes only those funds transferred from the Department of Public Instruction.
  5. The Department of Health and Human Services shall cease disbursement of educational funding to a PRTF upon receipt of a written notice from the Department of Public Instruction that educational services have not been provided. Educational funding disbursement shall be reinstated by the Department of Health and Human Services upon written notice from the Department of Public Instruction that the PRTF is providing educational services.
  6. A PRTF that receives educational funding shall comply with all audit and accounting policies applicable to other public and private entities receiving public funding.

History. 2014-100, s. 8.39(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.8, made this section effective July 1, 2014.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(i), provides: “In accordance with G.S. 122C-450.1(d) [122C-451(d)], as enacted by this act, the Department of Public Instruction shall transfer the funds provided for in this act for the purchase of educational services within PRTFs pursuant to this section to the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS).”

§ 122C-452. Information sharing.

  1. Within three business days of admitting a child into a PRTF, the admitting PRTF shall notify (i) the Department of Public Instruction and (ii) the local school administrative unit in which the child was last enrolled, if known. The PRTF shall request a copy of the child’s most current Individualized Education Program and any other available documents related to the provision of appropriate educational services from the local school administrative unit. To the extent practicable, the local school administrative unit shall provide this information within three business days of receiving a request made pursuant to this subsection. Upon withdrawal or discharge of a child, the PRTF shall notify the Department of Public Instruction within three business days of such withdrawal or discharge.
  2. The PRTF and the receiving local school administrative unit shall work together to develop a transition plan, including a revised Individualized Education Program, if necessary, to be implemented upon discharge of the child residing in a PRTF.

History. 2014-100, s. 8.39(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.8, made this section effective July 1, 2014.

§ 122C-453. Technical assistance and monitoring.

The State Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruction shall (i) offer training to PRTFs on compliance with special education laws and regulations, (ii) maintain a current list of names of children residing in PRTFs along with the name and contact information of the PRTF in which each child resides, and (iii) develop and implement rules to monitor the delivery of educational services in PRTFs, including a process to inform the Department of Health and Human Services when services are not being provided. The Department of Health and Human Services shall appropriately enforce applicable licensing requirements as provided under G.S. 122C-23.1 .

History. 2014-100, s. 8.39(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.8, made this section effective July 1, 2014.

§ 122C-454. Reporting requirement.

The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Instruction, in collaboration with other interested agencies, shall submit, by January 15 of each year, a joint report to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee and to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services on the delivery of educational services in PRTFs, including (i) the annual number of children by age residing in a PRTF both with and without an Individualized Education Program, (ii) the average length of stay of these children, (iii) the types of educational services, including number of hours each type of service has been provided, (iv) the costs and outcomes of providing educational services, and (v) recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering educational services to children residing in PRTFs.

History. 2014-100, s. 8.39(e).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 38.8, made this section effective July 1, 2014.

Session Laws 2014-100, s. 8.39(h), provides: “The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Instruction, in collaboration with other interested agencies, shall submit its initial joint report, as required by G.S. 122C-450.4 [122C-454], to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee and to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services by January 15, 2015.”

§§ 122C-455 through 122C-464.

Reserved for future codification purposes.

Part 5. Traumatic Brain Injury And Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Services for Veterans.

§ 122C-465. Definitions.

As used in this Part, the following definitions apply:

  1. Authorized medical professional. — A doctor of medicine, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or doctor of osteopathy licensed to practice in this State.
  2. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment. — Treatment with a valid prescription from an authorized medical professional in either a hyperbaric chamber approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or a device with an appropriate FDA-approved investigational device exemption.
  3. Veteran. — A person who served on active duty, other than for training, in any component of the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of 180 days or more, unless released earlier because of service-connected disability, and who was discharged or released from the Armed Forces of the United States under other than dishonorable conditions.

History. 2019-175, s. 2(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-175, s. 1, provides: “This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘North Carolina Veterans Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment and Recovery Act of 2019.’ ”

Session Laws 2019-175, s. 3, made this Part effective October 1, 2019.

The preamble to Session Laws 2019-175, provides: “Whereas, hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a recognized and accepted treatment for wound care and inflammation disorders; and

“Whereas, traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder are recognized to result from brain injuries and subsequent inflammation; Now, therefore,”

§ 122C-466. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment authorized.

  1. No person other than an authorized medical professional shall prescribe hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment to a veteran for the treatment of traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder. Any authorized medical professional who prescribes hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment to a veteran for traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder shall do so in a manner that complies with the standard approved treatment protocols for this therapy.
  2. Any veteran residing in North Carolina who has been diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder by an authorized medical professional may receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment in this State.

History. 2019-175, s. 2(b).

Editor’s Note.

Session Laws 2019-175, s. 1, provides: “This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘North Carolina Veterans Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment and Recovery Act of 2019.’ ”

§ 122C-999.

Table of Comparable Sections for Chapters 122 and 122C Prepared by Legislative Services Office tablenum=“=table24” align=“left”> =c1 122-23.3 . . . . . 122C-22 =c1 122-23.4 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-23.5 . . . . . 122C-24 =c1 122-23.6 . . . . . 122C-25 =c1 122-23.7 . . . . . 122C-26 =c1 122-23.8 . . . . . 122C-27 =c1 122-23.9 . . . . . 122C-28 =c1 122-23.10 . . . . . 122C-29 =c1 122-24 . . . . . 122C-210.1 =c1 122-24.1 . . . . . 122C-122 =c1 122-27 . . . . . 122C-205 =c1 122-28 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-31 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-33 . . . . . 122C-183 =c1 122-34 . . . . . 122C-184 =c1 122-35 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.13 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.14 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.15 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.16 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.17 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.24 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.25 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.26 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.27 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.35 . . . . . 122C-2 =c2 122C-101 =c2 122C-117 =c2 122C-118 =c2 122C-132 =c2 122C-191 =c1 122-35.36 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-112 =c2 122C-116 =c2 122C-132 =c1 122-35.37 . . . . . 122C-112 =c2 122C-117 =c1 122-35.38 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-35.39 . . . . . 122C-115 =c2 122C-118 =c1 122-35.40 . . . . . 122C-118 =c2 122C-119 =c1 122-35.40A . . . . . 122C-120 =c1 122-35.40B . . . . . 122C-152 =c1 122-35.40C . . . . . 122C-153 =c1 122-35.40D . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.41 . . . . . 122C-141 =c2 122C-145 =c1 122-35.42 . . . . . 122C-115 =c1 122-35.43 . . . . . 122C-132 =c2 122C-143 =c1 122-35.44 . . . . . 122C-144 =c1 122-35.45 . . . . . 122C-117 =c2 122C-121 =c2 122C-154 =c2 122C-155 =c1 122-35.45A . . . . . 122C-158 =c1 122-35.46 . . . . . 122C-156 =c1 122-35.47 . . . . . 122C-146 =c1 122-35.48 . . . . . 122C-157 =c1 122-35.49 . . . . . 122C-141 =c2 122C-142 =c1 122-35.50 . . . . . 122C-145 =c1 122-35.51 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.52 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.53 . . . . . 122C-147 =c1 122-35.54 . . . . . 122C-148 =c1 122-35.55 . . . . . 122C-149 =c1 122-35.56 . . . . . 122C-150 =c1 122-35.57 . . . . . 122C-151 =c1 122-36 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-37 . . . . . 122C-341 =c2 122C-348 =c1 122-38 . . . . . 122C-342 =c2 122C-343 =c2 122C-345 =c1 122-39 . . . . . 122C-345 =c2 122C-346 =c2 122C-348 =c1 122-40 . . . . . 122C-347 =c1 122-40.1 . . . . . 122C-344 =c1 122-41 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-42 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-43 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-48 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-49 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-50 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-51 . . . . . 122C-204 =c1 122-53 . . . . . 122C-186 =c1 122-54 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-55 . . . . . 122C-203 =c1 122-55.1 . . . . . 122C-51 =c1 122-55.2 . . . . . 122C-53 =c2 122C-58 =c2 122C-62 =c1 122-55.3 . . . . . 122C-60 =c1 122-55.4 . . . . . 122C-59 =c1 122-55.5 . . . . . 122C-51 =c1 122-55.6 . . . . . 122C-57 =c2 122C-61 =c2 122C-206 =c1 122-55.7 . . . . . 122C-58 =c1 122-55.8 . . . . . 122C-63 =c1 122-55.13 . . . . . 122C-51 =c2 122C-62 =c1 122-55.14 . . . . . 122C-62 =c1 122-56.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-56.2 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-56.3 . . . . . 122C-211 =c2 122C-212 =c1 122-56.4 . . . . . 122C-321 =c1 122-56.5 . . . . . 122C-221 =c2 122C-222 =c2 122C-231 =c1 122-56.6 . . . . . 122C-208 =c1 122-56.7 . . . . . 122C-223 =c2 122C-224 =c2 122C-232 =c2 122C-233 =c1 122-56.8 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-56.9 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-56.10 . . . . . 122C-312 =c1 122-58.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-58.2 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-58.3 . . . . . 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-58.4 . . . . . 122C-252 =c2 122C-263 =c2 122C-283 =c1 122-58.5 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.6 . . . . . 122C-266 =c2 122C-285 =c1 122-58.6A . . . . . 122C-265 =c1 122-58.7 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.7A . . . . . 122C-269 =c1 122-58.7A:1 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.8 . . . . . 122C-253 =c2 122C-271 =c2 122C-287 =c1 122-58.8A . . . . . 122C-210.1 =c1 122-58.9 . . . . . 122C-272 =c2 122C-288 =c1 122-58.10 . . . . . 122C-270 =c2 122C-289 =c1 122-58.10A . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-273 =c2 122C-290 =c1 122-58.10B . . . . . 122C-274 =c1 122-58.11 . . . . . 122C-276 =c2 122C-292 =c1 122-58.11A . . . . . 122C-275 =c1 122-58.12 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.13 . . . . . 122C-277 =c2 122C-293 =c1 122-58.14 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-58.15 . . . . . 122C-332 =c1 122-58.16 . . . . . 122C-143 =c2 122C-294 =c1 122-58.17 . . . . . Sec. 63(e) =c2 (Uncod.) =c1 122-58.18 . . . . . 122C-262 =c2 122C-282 =c1 122-58.19 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.20 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.21 . . . . . 122C-322 =c1 122-58.22 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.23 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.24 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.25 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-58.26 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-58.27 . . . . . 122C-254 =c1 122-65.10 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-65.11 . . . . . 122C-301 =c1 122-65.12 . . . . . 122C-302 =c1 122-65.13 . . . . . 122C-303 =c1 122-69 . . . . . 122C-112 =c2 122C-181 =c1 122-69.1 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-70 . . . . . 122C-241 =c1 122-71 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.1 . . . . . 122C-242 =c1 122-71.2 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-71.3 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.4 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.5 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.6 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-72 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-72.1 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-73 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-74 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81.1 . . . . . 122C-211 =c1 122-81.2 . . . . . 122C-207 =c2 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-82 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-85 . . . . . 122C-313 =c1 122-85.1 . . . . . 122C-311 =c1 122-92 . . . . . 122C-401 =c1 122-93 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-94 . . . . . 122C-402 =c1 122-95 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-403 =c1 122-96 . . . . . 122C-405 =c1 122-97 . . . . . 122C-406 =c1 122-98 . . . . . 122C-408 =c1 122-98.1 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.2 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.3 . . . . . 122C-421 =c1 122-99 . . . . . 122C-361 =c1 122-100 . . . . . 122C-362 =c1 122-101 . . . . . 122C-363 =c1 122-102 . . . . . 122C-364 =c1 122-103 . . . . . 122C-365 =c1 122-104 . . . . . 122C-366 =c1 122-109 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-120 . . . . . 122C-431 =c1 122-121 . . . . . 122C-432 =c1 122-122 . . . . . 122C-433 =te =c1 122-35.42 . . . . . 122C-115 =c1 122-35.43 . . . . . 122C-132 =c2 122C-143 =c1 122-35.44 . . . . . 122C-144 =c1 122-35.45 . . . . . 122C-117 =c2 122C-121 =c2 122C-154 =c2 122C-155 =c1 122-35.45A . . . . . 122C-158 =c1 122-35.46 . . . . . 122C-156 =c1 122-35.47 . . . . . 122C-146 =c1 122-35.48 . . . . . 122C-157 =c1 122-35.49 . . . . . 122C-141 =c2 122C-142 =c1 122-35.50 . . . . . 122C-145 =c1 122-35.51 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.52 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-35.53 . . . . . 122C-147 =c1 122-35.54 . . . . . 122C-148 =c1 122-35.55 . . . . . 122C-149 =c1 122-35.56 . . . . . 122C-150 =c1 122-35.57 . . . . . 122C-151 =c1 122-36 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-37 . . . . . 122C-341 =c2 122C-348 =c1 122-38 . . . . . 122C-342 =c2 122C-343 =c2 122C-345 =c1 122-39 . . . . . 122C-345 =c2 122C-346 =c2 122C-348 =c1 122-40 . . . . . 122C-347 =c1 122-40.1 . . . . . 122C-344 =c1 122-41 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-42 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-43 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-48 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-49 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-50 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-51 . . . . . 122C-204 =c1 122-53 . . . . . 122C-186 =c1 122-54 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-55 . . . . . 122C-203 =c1 122-55.1 . . . . . 122C-51 =c1 122-55.2 . . . . . 122C-53 =c2 122C-58 =c2 122C-62 =c1 122-55.3 . . . . . 122C-60 =c1 122-55.4 . . . . . 122C-59 =c1 122-55.5 . . . . . 122C-51 =c1 122-55.6 . . . . . 122C-57 =c2 122C-61 =c2 122C-206 =c1 122-55.7 . . . . . 122C-58 =c1 122-55.8 . . . . . 122C-63 =c1 122-55.13 . . . . . 122C-51 =c2 122C-62 =c1 122-55.14 . . . . . 122C-62 =c1 122-56.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-56.2 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-56.3 . . . . . 122C-211 =c2 122C-212 =c1 122-56.4 . . . . . 122C-321 =c1 122-56.5 . . . . . 122C-221 =c2 122C-222 =c2 122C-231 =c1 122-56.6 . . . . . 122C-208 =c1 122-56.7 . . . . . 122C-223 =c2 122C-224 =c2 122C-232 =c2 122C-233 =c1 122-56.8 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-56.9 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-56.10 . . . . . 122C-312 =c1 122-58.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-58.2 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-58.3 . . . . . 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-58.4 . . . . . 122C-252 =c2 122C-263 =c2 122C-283 =c1 122-58.5 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.6 . . . . . 122C-266 =c2 122C-285 =c1 122-58.6A . . . . . 122C-265 =c1 122-58.7 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.7A . . . . . 122C-269 =c1 122-58.7A:1 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.8 . . . . . 122C-253 =c2 122C-271 =c2 122C-287 =c1 122-58.8A . . . . . 122C-210.1 =c1 122-58.9 . . . . . 122C-272 =c2 122C-288 =c1 122-58.10 . . . . . 122C-270 =c2 122C-289 =c1 122-58.10A . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-273 =c2 122C-290 =c1 122-58.10B . . . . . 122C-274 =c1 122-58.11 . . . . . 122C-276 =c2 122C-292 =c1 122-58.11A . . . . . 122C-275 =c1 122-58.12 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.13 . . . . . 122C-277 =c2 122C-293 =c1 122-58.14 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-58.15 . . . . . 122C-332 =c1 122-58.16 . . . . . 122C-143 =c2 122C-294 =c1 122-58.17 . . . . . Sec. 63(e) =c2 (Uncod.) =c1 122-58.18 . . . . . 122C-262 =c2 122C-282 =c1 122-58.19 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.20 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.21 . . . . . 122C-322 =c1 122-58.22 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.23 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.24 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.25 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-58.26 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-58.27 . . . . . 122C-254 =c1 122-65.10 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-65.11 . . . . . 122C-301 =c1 122-65.12 . . . . . 122C-302 =c1 122-65.13 . . . . . 122C-303 =c1 122-69 . . . . . 122C-112 =c2 122C-181 =c1 122-69.1 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-70 . . . . . 122C-241 =c1 122-71 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.1 . . . . . 122C-242 =c1 122-71.2 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-71.3 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.4 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.5 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.6 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-72 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-72.1 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-73 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-74 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81.1 . . . . . 122C-211 =c1 122-81.2 . . . . . 122C-207 =c2 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-82 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-85 . . . . . 122C-313 =c1 122-85.1 . . . . . 122C-311 =c1 122-92 . . . . . 122C-401 =c1 122-93 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-94 . . . . . 122C-402 =c1 122-95 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-403 =c1 122-96 . . . . . 122C-405 =c1 122-97 . . . . . 122C-406 =c1 122-98 . . . . . 122C-408 =c1 122-98.1 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.2 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.3 . . . . . 122C-421 =c1 122-99 . . . . . 122C-361 =c1 122-100 . . . . . 122C-362 =c1 122-101 . . . . . 122C-363 =c1 122-102 . . . . . 122C-364 =c1 122-103 . . . . . 122C-365 =c1 122-104 . . . . . 122C-366 =c1 122-109 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-120 . . . . . 122C-431 =c1 122-121 . . . . . 122C-432 =c1 122-122 . . . . . 122C-433 =te =c1 122-55.3 . . . . . 122C-60 =c1 122-55.4 . . . . . 122C-59 =c1 122-55.5 . . . . . 122C-51 =c1 122-55.6 . . . . . 122C-57 =c2 122C-61 =c2 122C-206 =c1 122-55.7 . . . . . 122C-58 =c1 122-55.8 . . . . . 122C-63 =c1 122-55.13 . . . . . 122C-51 =c2 122C-62 =c1 122-55.14 . . . . . 122C-62 =c1 122-56.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-56.2 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-56.3 . . . . . 122C-211 =c2 122C-212 =c1 122-56.4 . . . . . 122C-321 =c1 122-56.5 . . . . . 122C-221 =c2 122C-222 =c2 122C-231 =c1 122-56.6 . . . . . 122C-208 =c1 122-56.7 . . . . . 122C-223 =c2 122C-224 =c2 122C-232 =c2 122C-233 =c1 122-56.8 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-56.9 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-56.10 . . . . . 122C-312 =c1 122-58.1 . . . . . 122C-201 =c1 122-58.2 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-58.3 . . . . . 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-58.4 . . . . . 122C-252 =c2 122C-263 =c2 122C-283 =c1 122-58.5 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.6 . . . . . 122C-266 =c2 122C-285 =c1 122-58.6A . . . . . 122C-265 =c1 122-58.7 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.7A . . . . . 122C-269 =c1 122-58.7A:1 . . . . . 122C-267 =c1 122-58.8 . . . . . 122C-253 =c2 122C-271 =c2 122C-287 =c1 122-58.8A . . . . . 122C-210.1 =c1 122-58.9 . . . . . 122C-272 =c2 122C-288 =c1 122-58.10 . . . . . 122C-270 =c2 122C-289 =c1 122-58.10A . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-273 =c2 122C-290 =c1 122-58.10B . . . . . 122C-274 =c1 122-58.11 . . . . . 122C-276 =c2 122C-292 =c1 122-58.11A . . . . . 122C-275 =c1 122-58.12 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.13 . . . . . 122C-277 =c2 122C-293 =c1 122-58.14 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-58.15 . . . . . 122C-332 =c1 122-58.16 . . . . . 122C-143 =c2 122C-294 =c1 122-58.17 . . . . . Sec. 63(e) =c2 (Uncod.) =c1 122-58.18 . . . . . 122C-262 =c2 122C-282 =c1 122-58.19 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.20 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.21 . . . . . 122C-322 =c1 122-58.22 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.23 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.24 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.25 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-58.26 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-58.27 . . . . . 122C-254 =c1 122-65.10 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-65.11 . . . . . 122C-301 =c1 122-65.12 . . . . . 122C-302 =c1 122-65.13 . . . . . 122C-303 =c1 122-69 . . . . . 122C-112 =c2 122C-181 =c1 122-69.1 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-70 . . . . . 122C-241 =c1 122-71 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.1 . . . . . 122C-242 =c1 122-71.2 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-71.3 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.4 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.5 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.6 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-72 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-72.1 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-73 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-74 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81.1 . . . . . 122C-211 =c1 122-81.2 . . . . . 122C-207 =c2 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-82 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-85 . . . . . 122C-313 =c1 122-85.1 . . . . . 122C-311 =c1 122-92 . . . . . 122C-401 =c1 122-93 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-94 . . . . . 122C-402 =c1 122-95 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-403 =c1 122-96 . . . . . 122C-405 =c1 122-97 . . . . . 122C-406 =c1 122-98 . . . . . 122C-408 =c1 122-98.1 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.2 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.3 . . . . . 122C-421 =c1 122-99 . . . . . 122C-361 =c1 122-100 . . . . . 122C-362 =c1 122-101 . . . . . 122C-363 =c1 122-102 . . . . . 122C-364 =c1 122-103 . . . . . 122C-365 =c1 122-104 . . . . . 122C-366 =c1 122-109 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-120 . . . . . 122C-431 =c1 122-121 . . . . . 122C-432 =c1 122-122 . . . . . 122C-433 =te =c1 122-58.11A . . . . . 122C-275 =c1 122-58.12 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.13 . . . . . 122C-277 =c2 122C-293 =c1 122-58.14 . . . . . 122C-251 =c1 122-58.15 . . . . . 122C-332 =c1 122-58.16 . . . . . 122C-143 =c2 122C-294 =c1 122-58.17 . . . . . Sec. 63(e) =c2 (Uncod.) =c1 122-58.18 . . . . . 122C-262 =c2 122C-282 =c1 122-58.19 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.20 . . . . . 122C-264 =c2 122C-284 =c1 122-58.21 . . . . . 122C-322 =c1 122-58.22 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.23 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-58.24 . . . . . 122C-270 =c1 122-58.25 . . . . . 122C-54 =c2 122C-207 =c1 122-58.26 . . . . . 122C-54 =c1 122-58.27 . . . . . 122C-254 =c1 122-65.10 . . . . . 122C-3 =c1 122-65.11 . . . . . 122C-301 =c1 122-65.12 . . . . . 122C-302 =c1 122-65.13 . . . . . 122C-303 =c1 122-69 . . . . . 122C-112 =c2 122C-181 =c1 122-69.1 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-70 . . . . . 122C-241 =c1 122-71 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.1 . . . . . 122C-242 =c1 122-71.2 . . . . . 122C-65 =c1 122-71.3 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.4 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.5 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-71.6 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-72 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-72.1 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-73 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-74 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81.1 . . . . . 122C-211 =c1 122-81.2 . . . . . 122C-207 =c2 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-82 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-85 . . . . . 122C-313 =c1 122-85.1 . . . . . 122C-311 =c1 122-92 . . . . . 122C-401 =c1 122-93 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-94 . . . . . 122C-402 =c1 122-95 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-403 =c1 122-96 . . . . . 122C-405 =c1 122-97 . . . . . 122C-406 =c1 122-98 . . . . . 122C-408 =c1 122-98.1 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.2 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.3 . . . . . 122C-421 =c1 122-99 . . . . . 122C-361 =c1 122-100 . . . . . 122C-362 =c1 122-101 . . . . . 122C-363 =c1 122-102 . . . . . 122C-364 =c1 122-103 . . . . . 122C-365 =c1 122-104 . . . . . 122C-366 =c1 122-109 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-120 . . . . . 122C-431 =c1 122-121 . . . . . 122C-432 =c1 122-122 . . . . . 122C-433 =te =c1 122-72 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-72.1 . . . . . 122C-23 =c1 122-73 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-74 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-81.1 . . . . . 122C-211 =c1 122-81.2 . . . . . 122C-207 =c2 122C-261 =c2 122C-281 =c1 122-82 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-85 . . . . . 122C-313 =c1 122-85.1 . . . . . 122C-311 =c1 122-92 . . . . . 122C-401 =c1 122-93 . . . . . Repealed =c1 122-94 . . . . . 122C-402 =c1 122-95 . . . . . 122C-3 =c2 122C-403 =c1 122-96 . . . . . 122C-405 =c1 122-97 . . . . . 122C-406 =c1 122-98 . . . . . 122C-408 =c1 122-98.1 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.2 . . . . . 122C-181 =c1 122-98.3 . . . . . 122C-421 =c1 122-99 . . . . . 122C-361 =c1 122-100 . . . . . 122C-362 =c1 122-101 . . . . . 122C-363 =c1 122-102 . . . . . 122C-364 =c1 122-103 . . . . . 122C-365 =c1 122-104 . . . . . 122C-366 =c1 122-109 . . . . . 122C-112 =c1 122-120 . . . . . 122C-431 =c1 122-121 . . . . . 122C-432 =c1 122-122 . . . . . 122C-433 =te